cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 70:
You are a linguist specializing in Komnzo. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): bä ane mni bäwzö b=y-kogr-o zä \stem{yé} z=\stem{yé} fothr zba=fa ___ mni bäwzö.
Gloss (with missing item): MED DEM fire bäwzö MED=TSG.MASC.ALPH-stand.NDU-ANDAT PROX TSG.MASC.COP.NDU PROX=TSG.MASC.COP.NDU fothr PROX.ABL=ABL ___ fire bäwzö.
The English translation of this sentence is:`There, mni bäwzö is standing there. From here it is fothr bäwzö and from there (it is) mni bäwzö.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Naturally, \isi{deictic} markers are found mostly in situations where visual identification is important. Example (\ref{ex272}) is taken from a plant walk, where the speaker points out two different kinds of trees: mni bäwzö and fothr (sometimes called fothr bäwzö).\footnote{The words bäwzö and fothr are proper nouns. However, mni means `fire' and the name mni bäwzö `fire bäwzö' is used because the bark of this tree is hardened over the fire and later used for house walls.} In the recording, fothr bäwzö trees stood between the speaker and some mni bäwzö trees. Hence, the latter are marked as being further away and all \isi{deictic} markers are \isi{medial}: the \isi{deictic} (bä `there'), the \isi{proclitic} on the verb (bikogro `it stands there') and the \isi{deictic} in \isi{ablative} \isi{case} (bobafa `from there'). Note that the verb is also inflected with an \isi{andative} suffix because more trees of the mni bäwzö kind were growing in that direction. As for the other tree, fothr bäwzö, it is marked by a \isi{proximal} \isi{deictic} (zä `here'), a \isi{proximal} \isi{demonstrative} \isi{identifier} (zyé `it is here') and another \isi{proximal} \isi{deictic} in the \isi{ablative} \isi{case} (zbafa `from here').\footnote{Both deictics bobafa and zbafa are doubly ablative, i.e. boba is already ablative and contrasts with allative bobo. This is the only example in the corpus of doubly marked deictics.}
A: word: b=y-kogr-o	 gloss: MED=TSG.MASC.ALPH-stand.NDU-ANDAT
B: word: boba	 gloss: MED.ABL
C: word: zba=fa	 gloss: PROX.ABL=ABL
D: word: boba=fa	 gloss: MED.ABL=ABL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 71:
You are a linguist specializing in Komnzo. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ane bä ___ büdisn=en mnz zn=en.
Gloss (with missing item): DEM MED ___ büdisn=LOC house place=LOC.
The English translation of this sentence is:`Those (dogs) were barking there in Büdisn at the house.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The three proclitics z=, b= and f= can in principle attach to verb forms of all TAM categories. For example, in (\ref{ex267}) the \isi{medial} b= is cliticised to a verb in the \isi{past} durative. Nevertheless, they occur most frequently with verbs in the present \isi{tense} because of their situational use.
A: word: zu-ä-r-a-th	 gloss: FSG.GAM-VC..NDU-give.RS-PST-STNSG
B: word: b=kw-a-ru-thr-m-th	 gloss: MED=M.BETaone-VC.-bark.EXT-NDU-DUR-STNSG
C: word: kw-a-rafi-nzr-m-th	 gloss: M.BETaone-VC.-paddle.EXT-NDU-DUR-STNSG.
D: word: s-ra-na-thr-m-th	 gloss: TSG.MASC.BET-IRR-eat.EXT-NDU-DUR-STNSG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 72:
You are a linguist specializing in Komnzo. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ ni w-mäg-n-e zöbthé.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ FNSG TSG.F.ALPH-lead.EXT-DU-FNSG first.
The English translation of this sentence is:`Where are they? We will lead (the path) first.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \isi{clitic} m= only occurs with the \isi{copula} and the meaning `where is X?', as in (\ref{ex271}). As I will discuss in {\S}\ref{tam-particles-sec}, m= can attach to verbs in the \isi{irrealis} or \isi{imperative} \isi{mood}s with an \isi{apprehensive} (`you might do X!') and \isi{prohibitve} interpretation (`you must not do X!'), respectively. Formally, the m= \isi{clitic} patterns with the other demonstratives (See \tabref{demonstratives-table} in {\S}\ref{demonstratives-sec}).
A: word: z=e-rä	 gloss: PROX=STNSG.ALPH-COP.NDU.
B: word: s-a-brim-∅	 gloss: TSG.MASC.BET-VC..NDU-return.RS-SSG.IMP
C: word: m=e-rn	 gloss: where=STNSG.ALPH-COP.DU
D: word: e-rä	 gloss: STNSG.Alph-COP.NDU
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C