cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 55:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): an bo wat=at ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG go coconut=OBJ ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`I climbed the coconut.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Directional verbs may also be used with a subject and object argument without use of di=. In these cases, the verbs indicate ongoing movement, or have less focus on the goal of the movement and more on the movement itself. (\ref{exe:waratsara}) is about climbing a coconut palm in order to pick coconuts. The focus is on the entire harvesting action, which does not finish at the top of the tree. Also, directional verbs without causative di= take a subject that is the moving referent, and an object that is a location. Directional verbs with causative di=, on the other hand, take a subject that is the causer, and an object that is the moving referent. See Table~\ref{tab:disubob}.
A: word: sarat=nin	 gloss: ascend=NEG
B: word: na=melelu	 gloss: CAUS-sit
C: word: kosarat=et	 gloss: hit=IRR
D: word: sarat=et	 gloss: ascend=IRR
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 56:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): mat ___ ye na=melelu ge
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG.OBJ ___ or CAUS-sit no
The English translation of this sentence is:`Put him to sleep, wake him up, no.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Kalamang employs several other causative strategies. One is causative proclitic ma= (na= before verbs in m-), as in~(\ref{exe:namin}) and~(\ref{exe:masala}). Another strategy is to use a \is{predicate!complex}complex predicate with paruo `to do; to make' (example~\ref{exe:eiganpa}, see also §\ref{sec:svccaus}). Both strategies have 28 corpus occurrences, and neither is productive.
A: word: na=min	 gloss: CAUS-sleep
B: word: min	 gloss: sleep
C: word: ko=garung	 gloss: APPL=chat
D: word: na=melelu	 gloss: CAUS-sit
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 57:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): mat na=min ye ___ ge
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG.OBJ CAUS-sleep or ___ no
The English translation of this sentence is:`Put him to sleep, wake him up, no.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Kalamang employs several other causative strategies. One is causative proclitic ma= (na= before verbs in m-), as in~(\ref{exe:namin}) and~(\ref{exe:masala}). Another strategy is to use a \is{predicate!complex}complex predicate with paruo `to do; to make' (example~\ref{exe:eiganpa}, see also §\ref{sec:svccaus}). Both strategies have 28 corpus occurrences, and neither is productive.
A: word: na=min	 gloss: CAUS-sleep
B: word: na=melelu	 gloss: CAUS-sit
C: word: nau=gang	 gloss: RECP=hang
D: word: ko=melelu	 gloss: APPL=sit
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 58:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): in koi wewar=ki ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL.EXCL then axe=INS ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`Then we break [it] off with the axe.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Kalamang employs several other causative strategies. One is causative proclitic ma= (na= before verbs in m-), as in~(\ref{exe:namin}) and~(\ref{exe:masala}). Another strategy is to use a \is{predicate!complex}complex predicate with paruo `to do; to make' (example~\ref{exe:eiganpa}, see also §\ref{sec:svccaus}). Both strategies have 28 corpus occurrences, and neither is productive.
A: word: salak	 gloss: ten_thousand
B: word: ecien	 gloss: return
C: word: ma=salaboung	 gloss: CAUS=broken
D: word: di=mu	 gloss: CAUS=3PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 59:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ma tan-un eir-gan ___ yorsik
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG arm-3POSS two-all ___ straight
The English translation of this sentence is:`He straightens both his arms.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Kalamang employs several other causative strategies. One is causative proclitic ma= (na= before verbs in m-), as in~(\ref{exe:namin}) and~(\ref{exe:masala}). Another strategy is to use a \is{predicate!complex}complex predicate with the morpheme ___ `to do; to its gloss ___' (example~\ref{exe:eiganpa}, see also §\ref{sec:svccaus}). Both strategies have 28 corpus occurrences, and neither is productive.
A: word: paruot=et	 gloss: make=IRR
B: word: paruon	 gloss: make
C: word: naras∼naras=in	 gloss: fight∼RED=PROH
D: word: paruo	 gloss: make
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D