cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 34:
You are a linguist specializing in Kagayanen. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ din s<in>ugba ya na sidda naan ta pinggan ko.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ 3S.ERG <NR.RES>-roast DEF.F LK fish SPAT.DEF NABS dish 1S.GEN
The English translation of this sentence is:‘S/he ate the roasted fish in my dish.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Example \REF{bkm:Ref396998462} illustrates the verb kaan ‘eat’ in its basic transitive argument structure with the agent expressed with an ergative pronoun and the patient, the roasted fish, with no prenominal marker, indicating it is absolutive. Example \REF{ex:inmydish-1} is a standard applicative in which the verb carries the applicative suffix, the roasted fish has been marked as non-absolutive, and the dish is now in the absolutive role. Finally, example \REF{ex:inmydish-2} illustrates the partitive use of the applicative construction. The case frame in \REF{ex:inmydish-2} is the same as in \REF{bkm:Ref396998462}. The only difference in structure is the presence of the applicative suffix. The semantic effect is to assert that only some of the roasted fish was consumed.
A: word: pa-kaan	 gloss: T.R-eat
B: word: maka-kaan	 gloss: I.HAP.IR-eat
C: word: na-dagsa	 gloss: A.HAP.R-wash.ashore
D: word: ga-kaan	 gloss: I.R-eat
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 35:
You are a linguist specializing in Kagayanen. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ din s<in>ugba ya na sidda naan ta pinggan ko.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ 3S.ERG <NR.RES>-roast DEF.F LK fish SPAT.DEF NABS dish 1S.GEN
The English translation of this sentence is:‘S/he ate the roasted fish in my dish.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Example \REF{bkm:Ref396998462} illustrates the verb kaan ‘eat’ in its basic transitive argument structure with the agent expressed with an ergative pronoun and the patient, the roasted fish, with no prenominal marker, indicating it is absolutive. Example \REF{ex:inmydish-1} is a standard applicative in which the verb carries the applicative suffix, the roasted fish has been marked as non-absolutive, and the dish is now in the absolutive role. Finally, example \REF{ex:inmydish-2} illustrates the partitive use of the applicative construction. The case frame in \REF{ex:inmydish-2} is the same as in \REF{bkm:Ref396998462}. The only difference in structure is the presence of the applicative suffix. The semantic effect is to assert that only some of the roasted fish was consumed.
A: word: maka-kaan	 gloss: I.HAP.IR-eat
B: word: ma-ng-tanem	 gloss: A.HAP.IR-PL-plant
C: word: ga-kaan	 gloss: I.R-eat
D: word: pa-kaan	 gloss: T.R-eat
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 36:
You are a linguist specializing in Kagayanen. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ din s<in>ugba ya na sidda naan ta pinggan ko.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ 3S.ERG <NR.RES>-roast DEF.F LK fish SPAT.DEF NABS dish 1S.GEN
The English translation of this sentence is:‘S/he ate the roasted fish in my dish.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: One way of understanding this usage is that, since the applicative has the default function of indicating that the absolutive is a location, recipient or some other non-patient semantic role, the use of the applicative when the absolutive is a patient expresses that it is somehow a less than prototypical patient. One reasonable interpretation of this is that the patient is not completely affected by the action of the verb. Another way of understanding this usage is that \REF{bkm:Ref396998462}b is the applicative of \REF{bkm:Ref396998462}a, while \REF{bkm:Ref396998462}c is the applicative of the detransitive of \REF{bkm:Ref396998462}b, given in \REF{bkm:Ref460337201}:
A: word: ga-kaan	 gloss: I.R-eat
B: word: maka-kaan	 gloss: I.HAP.IR-eat
C: word: pa-kaan	 gloss: T.R-eat
D: word: na-dagsa-an	 gloss: A.HAP.R-wash.ashore-APL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 37:
You are a linguist specializing in Kagayanen. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ din s<in>ugba ya na sidda naan ta pinggan ko.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ 3S.ERG <NR.RES>-roast DEF.F LK fish SPAT.DEF NABS dish 1S.GEN
The English translation of this sentence is:‘S/he ate the roasted fish in my dish.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: One way of understanding this usage is that, since the applicative has the default function of indicating that the absolutive is a location, recipient or some other non-patient semantic role, the use of the applicative when the absolutive is a patient expresses that it is somehow a less than prototypical patient. One reasonable interpretation of this is that the patient is not completely affected by the action of the verb. Another way of understanding this usage is that \REF{bkm:Ref396998462}b is the applicative of \REF{bkm:Ref396998462}a, while \REF{bkm:Ref396998462}c is the applicative of the detransitive of \REF{bkm:Ref396998462}b, given in \REF{bkm:Ref460337201}:
A: word: maka-kaan	 gloss: I.HAP.IR-eat
B: word: pa-pa-tunaw	 gloss: T.R-CAUS-dissolve
C: word: ga-kaan	 gloss: I.R-eat
D: word: pa-kaan	 gloss: T.R-eat
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 38:
You are a linguist specializing in Kagayanen. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ din s<in>ugba ya na sidda naan ta pinggan ko.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ 3S.ERG <NR.RES>-roast DEF.F LK fish SPAT.DEF NABS dish 1S.GEN
The English translation of this sentence is:‘S/he ate the roasted fish in my dish.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: One way of understanding this usage is that, since the applicative has the default function of indicating that the absolutive is a location, recipient or some other non-patient semantic role, the use of the applicative when the absolutive is a patient expresses that it is somehow a less than prototypical patient. One reasonable interpretation of this is that the patient is not completely affected by the action of the verb. Another way of understanding this usage is that \REF{bkm:Ref396998462}b is the applicative of \REF{bkm:Ref396998462}a, while \REF{bkm:Ref396998462}c is the applicative of the detransitive of \REF{bkm:Ref396998462}b, given in \REF{bkm:Ref460337201}:
A: word: pa-luto-en	 gloss: CAUS-cook-T.IR
B: word: pa-kaan	 gloss: T.R-eat
C: word: maka-kaan	 gloss: I.HAP.IR-eat
D: word: ga-kaan	 gloss: I.R-eat
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 39:
You are a linguist specializing in Kagayanen. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ din s<in>ugba ya na sidda naan ta pinggan ko.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ 3S.ERG <NR.RES>-roast DEF.F LK fish SPAT.DEF NABS dish 1S.GEN
The English translation of this sentence is:‘S/he ate the roasted fish in my dish.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: One way of understanding this usage is that, since the applicative has the default function of indicating that the absolutive is a location, recipient or some other non-patient semantic role, the use of the applicative when the absolutive is a patient expresses that it is somehow a less than prototypical patient. One reasonable interpretation of this is that the patient is not completely affected by the action of the verb. Another way of understanding this usage is that \REF{bkm:Ref396998462}b is the applicative of \REF{bkm:Ref396998462}a, while \REF{bkm:Ref396998462}c is the applicative of the detransitive of \REF{bkm:Ref396998462}b, given in \REF{bkm:Ref460337201}:
A: word: pa-dawat-a	 gloss: T.R-hand.to-XC
B: word: pa-kaan	 gloss: T.R-eat
C: word: maka-kaan	 gloss: I.HAP.IR-eat
D: word: ga-kaan	 gloss: I.R-eat
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 40:
You are a linguist specializing in Kagayanen. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ kanen ta s<in>ugba ya na sidda naan ta pinggan ko.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ 3S.ABS NABS <NR.RES>-roast DEF.F LK fish SPAT.DEF NABS dish 1S.GEN
The English translation of this sentence is:‘S/he ate roasted fish in my dish.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: One way of understanding this usage is that, since the applicative has the default function of indicating that the absolutive is a location, recipient or some other non-patient semantic role, the use of the applicative when the absolutive is a patient expresses that it is somehow a less than prototypical patient. One reasonable interpretation of this is that the patient is not completely affected by the action of the verb. Another way of understanding this usage is that \REF{bkm:Ref396998462}b is the applicative of \REF{bkm:Ref396998462}a, while \REF{bkm:Ref396998462}c is the applicative of the detransitive of \REF{bkm:Ref396998462}b, given in \REF{bkm:Ref460337201}:
A: word: pa-kaan	 gloss: T.R-eat
B: word: maka-kaan	 gloss: I.HAP.IR-eat
C: word: na-dagsa-an	 gloss: A.HAP.R-wash.ashore-APL
D: word: ga-kaan	 gloss: I.R-eat
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 41:
You are a linguist specializing in Kagayanen. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ danen an parti ta kasaļ.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ 3P.ABS DEF.M about NABS wedding
The English translation of this sentence is:‘They will make an agreement with each other about the wedding.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: With some other verbs, such as ambaļ ‘say’ and palangga ‘love’, -anay asserts a more binding, intense, united, or closer feeling or relationship than -ay does. For example, mag-ambaļanay means ‘to make an agreement’ such as families meeting together to talk about the wedding of the children (example \ref{bkm:Ref414723411}). Mag-ambaļay, on the other hand, means to speak to each other again after some time of not speaking (example \ref{bkm:Ref414723505}).
A: word: mag-ambaļ	 gloss: I.IR-say
B: word: pa-ambaļ-an	 gloss: T.R-say-APL
C: word: mag--ambaļ-anay	 gloss: I.IR-say-REC
D: word: na-tunaw	 gloss: A.HAP.R-dissolve
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 42:
You are a linguist specializing in Kagayanen. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ ki ta kada isya.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ 1P.INCL.ABS NABS each one
The English translation of this sentence is:‘We love each other.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \hspace*{-.6pt}The inflected verb gapalanggaay means to ‘love each other’ (example \ref{bkm:Ref414723576}), while gapalanggaanay means to ‘seriously love each other from one’s heart’ (example \ref{bkm:Ref414723659}).
A: word: mag--ambaļ-anay	 gloss: I.IR-say-REC
B: word: ga-palangga-ay	 gloss: I.R-love-REC
C: word: ga-kita-ay	 gloss: I.R-see-REC
D: word: palangga	 gloss: love
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 43:
You are a linguist specializing in Kagayanen. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Bag-o, anen ko dya ___ ake na mga mangngod.
Gloss (with missing item): before EXT.G 1S.ERG D4LOC ___ 1S.GEN LK PL younger.sibling
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Then, there I handed my younger siblings off (to the man in the yard)!’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Example \REF{bkm:Ref123024886} is from a story about a house fire. The speaker gets her younger siblings and hands them to a man in the yard to take care of while she is trying to help save some of the house. The use of the exclamatory suffix on the verb underscores the desperation of the situation.
A: word: pa-dawat-a	 gloss: T.R-hand.to-XC
B: word: pa-daļa	 gloss: T.R-carry
C: word: ma-ng-tampara	 gloss: A.HAP.IR-PL-goggles
D: word: …-kamang-a	 gloss: T.R-get-XC
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A