cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 138:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ [wuma tu-mbro] mɤ-kɯ-cʰa] ci ŋu tɕe,
Gloss (with missing item): ___ really IPFV-be.high NEG-SBJ:PCP-can INDEF be:FACT LNK
The English translation of this sentence is:`It is a tree that cannot grow very high.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The complements whose arguments or adjuncts are relativized can be either finite (\ref{ex:tWthe.kWra}, \ref{ex:tWnAjonW.kWra}, \ref{ex:Cea.kWra}, \ref{ex:YWnWpea.kWra}, \ref{ex:tumbro.mAkWcha}) or infinitival clauses (\ref{ex:kAnWtsW.kWra}, \ref{ex:kArWCmi.kWspa}, \ref{ex:kAmto.pWrYota}), just like when the com\-ple\-ment-taking verbs are in finite form. In addition, the verb of the complement clause can also bear subject participle form if the relativized element is the subject of the complement clause, as in (\ref{smAnkhaN.kWCe.kWra}) and (\ref{WkukWndWn.kWcha}) (see also §\ref{sec:subject.participle.other.relative}, §\ref{sec:subject.participle.complementation}).
A: word: si	 gloss: tree
B: word: sɯkɤku	 gloss: treetop
C: word: kɯ-ɤ-rtsi	 gloss: SBJ:PCP-PASS-count
D: word: qapri	 gloss: snake
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 139:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [aʑo [kɤ-mto] pɯ-rɲo-t-a] ___ ci tu tɕe,
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG INF-see AOR-experience-PST:TR-1SG ___ INDEF exist:FACT LNK
The English translation of this sentence is:`There is a girl whom I saw before and....'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The complements whose arguments or adjuncts are relativized can be either finite (\ref{ex:tWthe.kWra}, \ref{ex:tWnAjonW.kWra}, \ref{ex:Cea.kWra}, \ref{ex:YWnWpea.kWra}, \ref{ex:tumbro.mAkWcha}) or infinitival clauses (\ref{ex:kAnWtsW.kWra}, \ref{ex:kArWCmi.kWspa}, \ref{ex:kAmto.pWrYota}), just like when the com\-ple\-ment-taking verbs are in finite form. In addition, the verb of the complement clause can also bear subject participle form if the relativized element is the subject of the complement clause, as in (\ref{smAnkhaN.kWCe.kWra}) and (\ref{WkukWndWn.kWcha}) (see also §\ref{sec:subject.participle.other.relative}, §\ref{sec:subject.participle.complementation}).
A: word: tɕʰemɤpɯ	 gloss: girl
B: word: tɕʰemɤ-pɯ	 gloss: girl-DIM
C: word: tɯrme	 gloss: people
D: word: tɤɕime	 gloss: young.lady
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 140:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ tɕʰi kɯ-tu] tɤ-tʰe jɤɣ-o
Gloss (with missing item): ___ what SBJ:PCP-exist IMP-ask[III] be.possible:FACT-SFP
The English translation of this sentence is:`Ask any/whatever question you [may] have.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: First, correlative relative clauses occur with interrogative pronouns used as free-choice indefinites (§\ref{sec:interrogative.relative}). In (\ref{ex:nAkAthu.tChi.kWtu}) for instance, the relative whose main verb is the participle \forme{kɯ-tu} has the pronoun \japhug{tɕʰi}{what} in apposition with the object participle \forme{the morpheme ___} `(the things) that you ask' as head, with the meaning `any' or `whatever'.
A: word: nɯʑora	 gloss: 2PL
B: word: nɤ-kɤ-ti	 gloss: 2SG.POSS-OBJ:PCP-say
C: word: nɤ-kɤ-tʰu	 gloss: 2SG.POSS-OBJ:PCP-ask
D: word: a-sɤ-tʰu	 gloss: 1SG.POSS-OBL:PCP-ask
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 141:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [[nɤ-kɤ-tʰu] ___ kɯ-tu] tɤ-tʰe jɤɣ-o
Gloss (with missing item): 2SG.POSS-OBJ:PCP-ask ___ SBJ:PCP-exist IMP-ask[III] be.possible:FACT-SFP
The English translation of this sentence is:`Ask any/whatever question you [may] have.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: First, correlative relative clauses occur with interrogative pronouns used as free-choice indefinites (§\ref{sec:interrogative.relative}). In (\ref{ex:nAkAthu.tChi.kWtu}) for instance, the relative whose main verb is the participle \forme{kɯ-tu} has the pronoun \japhug{the morpheme ___}{its gloss ___} in apposition with the object participle \forme{nɤ-kɤ-tʰu} `(the things) that you ask' as head, with the meaning `any' or `its gloss ___ever'.
A: word: <yazi>	 gloss: duck
B: word: tʰɯtʰɤci	 gloss: something
C: word: mtɕʰi	 gloss: sea.buckthorn
D: word: tɕʰi	 gloss: what
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 142:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ ra kɯ\redp{}kɯ-tu ʑo a-tɤ-bɯɣ-nɯ smɯlɤm
Gloss (with missing item): ___ PL TOTAL\redp{}SBJ:PCP-exist EMPH IRR-PFV-miss.home-PL prayer
The English translation of this sentence is:`May all of my companions miss home!'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Second, totalitative reduplication (§\ref{sec:totalitative.redp}) indicates universal quantification of the relativized element (§\ref{sec:totalitative.relatives}). In particular, the reduplicated form of the \forme{kɯ\redp{}kɯ-tu} `all those that/who exist' of the existential verb \japhug{tu}{exist} can follow nouns (\ref{ex:azda.ra.kWkWtu}), with a meaning similar to the adverbial determiner \japhug{tʰamtɕɤt}{all} (§\ref{sec:universal.quant}).
A: word: a-zda	 gloss: 1SG.POSS-companion
B: word: nɤ-mu	 gloss: 2SG.POSS-mother
C: word: nɤ-zda	 gloss: 2SG.POSS-companion
D: word: ɯ-zda	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-mater
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 143:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): a-zda ___ kɯ\redp{}kɯ-tu ʑo a-tɤ-bɯɣ-nɯ smɯlɤm
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG.POSS-companion ___ TOTAL\redp{}SBJ:PCP-exist EMPH IRR-PFV-miss.home-PL prayer
The English translation of this sentence is:`May all of my companions miss home!'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Second, totalitative reduplication (§\ref{sec:totalitative.redp}) indicates universal quantification of the relativized element (§\ref{sec:totalitative.relatives}). In particular, the reduplicated form of the \forme{kɯ\redp{}kɯ-tu} `all those that/who exist' of the existential verb \japhug{tu}{exist} can follow nouns (\ref{ex:azda.the morpheme ___.kWkWtu}), with a meaning similar to the adverbial determiner \japhug{tʰamtɕɤt}{all} (§\ref{sec:universal.quant}).
A: word: ɯʑora	 gloss: 3PL
B: word: ra	 gloss: PL
C: word: nɯʑora	 gloss: 2PL
D: word: <qingyang>	 gloss: bharal
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 144:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ ra kɯ\redp{}kɯ-tu ʑo a-tɤ-bɯɣ-nɯ smɯlɤm
Gloss (with missing item): ___ PL TOTAL\redp{}SBJ:PCP-exist EMPH IRR-PFV-miss.home-PL prayer
The English translation of this sentence is:`May all of my companions miss home!'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Constructions such as that in (\ref{ex:azda.ra.kWkWtu}) originate from head-internal (or postnominal) participial relatives (`all my existing companions'). However, it is unclear whether this analysis is still valid synchronically, and even whether \forme{kɯ\redp{}kɯ-tu} is still a participle. It may have been reanalyzed as a postnominal quantifier, as suggested by the fact that it can occur with pronouns, as in (\ref{ex:nWZora.kWkWtu}), where an interpretation in terms of a relative clause, whether restrictive (`all those of you who exist'?) or non-restrictive (`you, all the existing ones'?) is more difficult.
A: word: ɯ-zda	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-mater
B: word: nɤ-zda	 gloss: 2SG.POSS-companion
C: word: a-zda	 gloss: 1SG.POSS-companion
D: word: ɯ-muj	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-feather
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 145:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): a-zda ___ kɯ\redp{}kɯ-tu ʑo a-tɤ-bɯɣ-nɯ smɯlɤm
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG.POSS-companion ___ TOTAL\redp{}SBJ:PCP-exist EMPH IRR-PFV-miss.home-PL prayer
The English translation of this sentence is:`May all of my companions miss home!'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Constructions such as that in (\ref{ex:azda.the morpheme ___.kWkWtu}) originate from head-internal (or postnominal) participial relatives (`all my existing companions'). However, it is unclear whether this analysis is still valid synchronically, and even whether \forme{kɯ\redp{}kɯ-tu} is still a participle. It may have been reanalyzed as a postnominal quantifier, as suggested by the fact that it can occur with pronouns, as in (\ref{ex:nWZothe morpheme ___.kWkWtu}), where an interpretation in terms of a relative clause, whether restrictive (`all those of you who exist'?) or non-restrictive (`you, all the existing ones'?) is more difficult.
A: word: ra	 gloss: PL
B: word: ɯ-ʁrɯ	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-horn
C: word: ɯʑora	 gloss: 3PL
D: word: tʰɯ-rgɤz	 gloss: AOR-be.old
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 146:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ kɯ\redp{}kɯ-tu ʑo lɤ-nɯ-jɣɤt-nɯ
Gloss (with missing item): ___ TOTAL\redp{}SBJ:PCP-exist EMPH IMP:UPSTREAM-VERT-turn.back
The English translation of this sentence is:`Turn back and go to your homes.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Constructions such as that in (\ref{ex:azda.ra.kWkWtu}) originate from head-internal (or postnominal) participial relatives (`all my existing companions'). However, it is unclear whether this analysis is still valid synchronically, and even whether \forme{kɯ\redp{}kɯ-tu} is still a participle. It may have been reanalyzed as a postnominal quantifier, as suggested by the fact that it can occur with pronouns, as in (\ref{ex:nWZora.kWkWtu}), where an interpretation in terms of a relative clause, whether restrictive (`all those of you who exist'?) or non-restrictive (`you, all the existing ones'?) is more difficult.
A: word: ɯʑora	 gloss: 3PL
B: word: ɯ-sroʁ	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-life
C: word: iʑora	 gloss: 1PL
D: word: nɯʑora	 gloss: 2PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 147:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): iɕqʰa ___ kɯ-ngo] ɣɤʑu tɕe, ɯ-kɯ-rtoʁ jɤ-ari-a wo!
Gloss (with missing item): just.before ___ SBJ:PCP-be.ill exist:SENS LNK 3SG.POSS-SBJ:PCP-see AOR-go[II]-1SG SFP
The English translation of this sentence is:`There is someone who is sick, I went to see him/her.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Head-internal relatives (§\ref{sec:head-internal.relative} ) can have a similar meaning if their head noun is a generic noun like \japhug{the morpheme ___}{its gloss ___} (§\ref{sec:tWrme.generic}), as in (\ref{ex:tWrme.kWngo.GAZu}).
A: word: a-tɯrme	 gloss: 1SG.POSS-man
B: word: tɯrme	 gloss: person
C: word: tɕi-wa	 gloss: 1DU.POSS-father
D: word: pjɯ-sɤtse	 gloss: IPFV-plant[III]
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 148:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): spjaŋkɯ ʁnɯz ni kɯ nɯnɯ nɤki, ___ la-tɕɤt] nɯ pa-mto-ndʑi tɕe, wuma ʑo ɲɤ-mu-ndʑi.
Gloss (with missing item): wolf two DU ERG DEM FILLER ___ AOR:3\flobv{}-take.out DEM AOR:3\flobv{}-see-DU LNK really EMPH IFR-be.afraid-DU
The English translation of this sentence is:`The two wolves, seeing that he had unsheathed his knife (or: seeing the knife that he had unsheathed), were very afraid. (150902 liaozhai lang-zh)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: For instance, in (\ref{ex:mbrWtCW.latCAt.nW}), the clause \forme{the morpheme ___ la-tɕɤt} (§\ref{sec:object.relativization}) can either be interpreted as a head-internal finite object relative clause (§\ref{sec:head-internal.relative} , §\ref{sec:object.relativization}) `the its gloss ___ that (the butcher) had unsheathed' or as a complement clause (§\ref{sec:finite.complement}) `that (the butcher) had unsheathed his its gloss ___'. Both interpretations would make sense in the context (§\ref{sec:relative.core.arg}).
A: word: mbrɯtɕɯ	 gloss: knife
B: word: ɯ-ʁrɯ	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-horn
C: word: rɯtɕi	 gloss: LNK
D: word: βɣɤrnɤjwaʁ	 gloss: blades
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 149:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tɕe nɯra [pɯ\redp{}pɯ-kɯ-fse] nɯra, ___ tɤ-kɤ-mɯrkɯ, tɤ-kɤ-ndza], qʰe ɕɤr tɕe [ɯ-βri tɤ-kɯ-rɤʑa] qʰe, [ɯ-βri tɕe iɕqʰa, <yazi> ɣɯ ɯ-muj nɯ-kɯ-ɬoʁ], nɯra pjɤ-fɕɤt.
Gloss (with missing item): LNK DEM:PL TOTAL\redp{}PST.IPFV-SBJ:PCP-be.like DEM:PL ___ AOR-OBJ:PCP-steal AOR-OBJ:PCP-eat LNK evening LOC 3SG.POSS-body AOR-SBJ:PCP-itch LNK 3SG.POSS-body LOC the.aforementioned duck GEN 3SG.POSS-feather AOR-SBJ:PCP-come.out DEM:PL IFR-tell
The English translation of this sentence is:`He told [the old man] everything that had happened, about the duck that he had stolen and eaten, and his body itching, and the duck feathers that had grown on it.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In (\ref{ex:yazi.tAkAmWrkW}), we find a series of non-finite verb forms in \forme{kɯ-} and \forme{kɤ-} in clauses that are object of the com\-ple\-ment-taking verb \japhug{fɕɤt}{tell} (§\ref{sec:velar.infinitives.complement.clauses}). Given the meaning of this example, it could appear to be preferrable to analyze these examples as complement clauses, translating \forme{the morpheme ___ tɤ-kɤ-mɯrkɯ, tɤ-kɤ-ndza} as `(he told him) that he had stolen and eaten a its gloss ___' and \forme{ɯ-βri ...nɯ-kɯ-ɬoʁ} as `that his body started itching, and that feathers started growing on it'.
A: word: ɯ-tɤɲi	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-staff
B: word: <guazi>	 gloss: melon.seed
C: word: <yazi>	 gloss: duck
D: word: pɣɤtɕɯ	 gloss: bird
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 150:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tɕe nɯra [pɯ\redp{}pɯ-kɯ-fse] nɯra, [<yazi> tɤ-kɤ-mɯrkɯ, tɤ-kɤ-ndza], qʰe ɕɤr tɕe ___ tɤ-kɯ-rɤʑa] qʰe, [ɯ-βri tɕe iɕqʰa, <yazi> ɣɯ ɯ-muj nɯ-kɯ-ɬoʁ], nɯra pjɤ-fɕɤt.
Gloss (with missing item): LNK DEM:PL TOTAL\redp{}PST.IPFV-SBJ:PCP-be.like DEM:PL duck AOR-OBJ:PCP-steal AOR-OBJ:PCP-eat LNK evening LOC ___ AOR-SBJ:PCP-itch LNK 3SG.POSS-body LOC the.aforementioned duck GEN 3SG.POSS-feather AOR-SBJ:PCP-come.out DEM:PL IFR-tell
The English translation of this sentence is:`He told [the old man] everything that had happened, about the duck that he had stolen and eaten, and his body itching, and the duck feathers that had grown on it.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In (\ref{ex:yazi.tAkAmWrkW}), we find a series of non-finite verb forms in \forme{kɯ-} and \forme{kɤ-} in clauses that are object of the com\-ple\-ment-taking verb \japhug{fɕɤt}{tell} (§\ref{sec:velar.infinitives.complement.clauses}). Given the meaning of this example, it could appear to be preferrable to analyze these examples as complement clauses, translating \forme{<yazi> tɤ-kɤ-mɯrkɯ, tɤ-kɤ-ndza} as `(he told him) that he had stolen and eaten a duck' and \forme{the morpheme ___ ...nɯ-kɯ-ɬoʁ} as `that his body started itching, and that feathers started growing on it'.
A: word: kʰa	 gloss: house
B: word: cʰɯ-βri-nɯ	 gloss: IPFV-protect-PL
C: word: ɯ-βri	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-body
D: word: nɯ-skʰrɯ	 gloss: 3PL.POSS-body
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 151:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tɕe nɯra [pɯ\redp{}pɯ-kɯ-fse] nɯra, [<yazi> tɤ-kɤ-mɯrkɯ, tɤ-kɤ-ndza], qʰe ɕɤr tɕe [ɯ-βri tɤ-kɯ-rɤʑa] qʰe, [ɯ-βri tɕe iɕqʰa, <yazi> ɣɯ ___ nɯ-kɯ-ɬoʁ], nɯra pjɤ-fɕɤt.
Gloss (with missing item): LNK DEM:PL TOTAL\redp{}PST.IPFV-SBJ:PCP-be.like DEM:PL duck AOR-OBJ:PCP-steal AOR-OBJ:PCP-eat LNK evening LOC 3SG.POSS-body AOR-SBJ:PCP-itch LNK 3SG.POSS-body LOC the.aforementioned duck GEN ___ AOR-SBJ:PCP-come.out DEM:PL IFR-tell
The English translation of this sentence is:`He told [the old man] everything that had happened, about the duck that he had stolen and eaten, and his body itching, and the duck feathers that had grown on it.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In (\ref{ex:yazi.tAkAmWrkW}), we find a series of non-finite verb forms in \forme{kɯ-} and \forme{kɤ-} in clauses that are object of the com\-ple\-ment-taking verb \japhug{fɕɤt}{tell} (§\ref{sec:velar.infinitives.complement.clauses}). Given the meaning of this example, it could appear to be preferrable to analyze these examples as complement clauses, translating \forme{<yazi> tɤ-kɤ-mɯrkɯ, tɤ-kɤ-ndza} as `(he told him) that he had stolen and eaten a duck' and \forme{ɯ-βri ...nɯ-kɯ-ɬoʁ} as `that his body started itching, and that feathers started growing on it'.
A: word: ɯ-<biaozhun>	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-criterion
B: word: mbrɯtɕɯ	 gloss: knife
C: word: ɯ-muj	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-feather
D: word: nɯ-muj	 gloss: 3PL.POSS-feather
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 152:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tɕe nɯra [pɯ\redp{}pɯ-kɯ-fse] nɯra, ___ tɤ-kɤ-mɯrkɯ, tɤ-kɤ-ndza], qʰe ɕɤr tɕe [ɯ-βri tɤ-kɯ-rɤʑa] qʰe, [ɯ-βri tɕe iɕqʰa, <yazi> ɣɯ ɯ-muj nɯ-kɯ-ɬoʁ], nɯra pjɤ-fɕɤt.
Gloss (with missing item): LNK DEM:PL TOTAL\redp{}PST.IPFV-SBJ:PCP-be.like DEM:PL ___ AOR-OBJ:PCP-steal AOR-OBJ:PCP-eat LNK evening LOC 3SG.POSS-body AOR-SBJ:PCP-itch LNK 3SG.POSS-body LOC the.aforementioned duck GEN 3SG.POSS-feather AOR-SBJ:PCP-come.out DEM:PL IFR-tell
The English translation of this sentence is:`He told [the old man] everything that had happened, about the duck that he had stolen and eaten, and his body itching, and the duck feathers that had grown on it.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: However, the problem with analyzing these clauses as infinitival complement clauses is that the intransitive motion verb \japhug{ɬoʁ}{come out}, being dynamic, never takes a \forme{kɤ-} infinitive, and that the form \forme{nɯ-kɯ-ɬoʁ} can only be a subject participle `(something) that has come out'. For this reason, the non-finite clauses in (\ref{ex:yazi.tAkAmWrkW}) have to be analyzed as head-internal and headless (object and subject) participial relative clauses.
A: word: pɣɤtɕɯ	 gloss: bird
B: word: ɯ-sɤtɕʰa	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-place
C: word: <guazi>	 gloss: melon.seed
D: word: <yazi>	 gloss: duck
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D