cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 121:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ tɕi-wa kɯ-naχtɕɯɣ]
Gloss (with missing item): ___ 1DU.POSS-father SBJ:PCP-be.the.same
The English translation of this sentence is:`Those whose parents are the same as mine.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Although the verb \japhug{naχtɕɯɣ}{be the same} can select a comitative argument (§\ref{sec:comitative}), (\ref{ex:tCimu.tCiwa.kWnaXtCWG}) is not an example of comitative relativization (§\ref{sec:comitative.relativization}). Rather, the construction from which (\ref{ex:tCimu.tCiwa.kWnaXtCWG}) has been relativized is the one in (\ref{ex:tCimYitChAz.YWnaXtCWG}), where the equality concerns the possessors of the intransitive subject.
A: word: a-mu	 gloss: 1SG.POSS-mother
B: word: tɕi-mɲaʁ	 gloss: 1DU.POSS-eye
C: word: tɤ-mu	 gloss: INDEF.POSS-mother
D: word: tɕi-mu	 gloss: 1DU.POSS-mother
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 122:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [tɕi-mu ___ kɯ-naχtɕɯɣ]
Gloss (with missing item): 1DU.POSS-mother ___ SBJ:PCP-be.the.same
The English translation of this sentence is:`Those whose parents are the same as mine.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Although the verb \japhug{naχtɕɯɣ}{be the same} can select a comitative argument (§\ref{sec:comitative}), (\ref{ex:tCimu.tCiwa.kWnaXtCWG}) is not an example of comitative relativization (§\ref{sec:comitative.relativization}). Rather, the construction from which (\ref{ex:tCimu.tCiwa.kWnaXtCWG}) has been relativized is the one in (\ref{ex:tCimYitChAz.YWnaXtCWG}), where the equality concerns the possessors of the intransitive subject.
A: word: tɕi-wa	 gloss: 1DU.POSS-father
B: word: tɯ-ŋga	 gloss: INDEF.POSS-clothes
C: word: a-wa	 gloss: 1SG.POSS-father
D: word: a-pɯ-xtɕi-nɯ	 gloss: IRR-IPFV-be.small-PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 123:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ tɕi-wa kɯ-naχtɕɯɣ]
Gloss (with missing item): ___ 1DU.POSS-father SBJ:PCP-be.the.same
The English translation of this sentence is:`Those whose parents are the same as mine.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Although the verb \japhug{naχtɕɯɣ}{be the same} can select a comitative argument (§\ref{sec:comitative}), (\ref{ex:tCimu.tCiwa.kWnaXtCWG}) is not an example of comitative relativization (§\ref{sec:comitative.relativization}). Rather, the construction from which (\ref{ex:tCimu.tCiwa.kWnaXtCWG}) has been relativized is the one in (\ref{ex:tCimYitChAz.YWnaXtCWG}), where the equality concerns the possessors of the intransitive subject.
A: word: a-mu	 gloss: 1SG.POSS-mother
B: word: tɯ-ŋga	 gloss: INDEF.POSS-clothes
C: word: tɕi-mɲaʁ	 gloss: 1DU.POSS-eye
D: word: tɕi-mu	 gloss: 1DU.POSS-mother
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 124:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [tɕi-mu ___ kɯ-naχtɕɯɣ]
Gloss (with missing item): 1DU.POSS-mother ___ SBJ:PCP-be.the.same
The English translation of this sentence is:`Those whose parents are the same as mine.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Although the verb \japhug{naχtɕɯɣ}{be the same} can select a comitative argument (§\ref{sec:comitative}), (\ref{ex:tCimu.tCiwa.kWnaXtCWG}) is not an example of comitative relativization (§\ref{sec:comitative.relativization}). Rather, the construction from which (\ref{ex:tCimu.tCiwa.kWnaXtCWG}) has been relativized is the one in (\ref{ex:tCimYitChAz.YWnaXtCWG}), where the equality concerns the possessors of the intransitive subject.
A: word: a-pɯ-xtɕi-nɯ	 gloss: IRR-IPFV-be.small-PL
B: word: a-wa	 gloss: 1SG.POSS-father
C: word: tɕi-wa	 gloss: 1DU.POSS-father
D: word: tɤ-pɤro	 gloss: INDEF.POSS-present
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 125:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [maka tɕekɯ ku-kɯ-ru tɕe tɕendi ___ [[ɯ-βzɯr tɕʰi kɯ-fse ŋu] kɯ-fse] mɤ-kɯ-sɤ-mto ʑo] scʰiz nɯ-azɣɯt ɲɯ-ŋu.
Gloss (with missing item): at.all east IPFV:EAST-GENR:S/O-look LNK west ___ 3SG.POSS-side what SBJ:PCP-be.like be:FACT SBJ:PCP-be.like NEG-SBJ:PCP-PROP-see EMPH APPROX.LOC AOR:WEST-reach SENS-be
The English translation of this sentence is:`He arrived at a river where if one looked from one bank to the other, what was on the other side was not at all visible.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In the participial relative taking \forme{mɤ-kɯ-sɤ-mto} `the one that is not visible' as its main verb in (\ref{ex:mAkWsAmto.schiz}), the head \japhug{the morpheme ___}{its gloss ___} is not the possessor of the subject in the proper sense, but the possessor of a noun (\japhug{ɯ-βzɯr}{its side}) subject of a clause embedded within another clause (headed by the participle \forme{kɯ-fse} `that is like...') serving as the subject of \forme{mɤ-kɯ-sɤ-mto} `the one that is not visible'.
A: word: tamar	 gloss: butter
B: word: tɕʰipʰɯɣ	 gloss: source.of.the.river
C: word: tɯrme	 gloss: people
D: word: smar	 gloss: river
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 126:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): iɕqʰa ___ ɯ-sroʁ kɤ-kɤ-ri] nɯ to-tɕɤt tɕe
Gloss (with missing item): the.aforementioned ___ 3SG.POSS-life AOR-OBJ:PCP-save DEM IFR-take.out LNK
The English translation of this sentence is:`He took out (from his bag) the bird whose life he had saved.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Possessors of objects can be relativized with object participial relatives (\ref{ex:pGAtCW.WsroR.kAkAri}) or finite relatives (\ref{ex:Wkho.mWthasWphWt}) exactly like direct objects (§\ref{sec:object.relativization}), but like subject possessors, they require the possessee to be overt and to bear a possessive prefix (\forme{ɯ-sroʁ} `its life' in \ref{ex:pGAtCW.WsroR.kAkAri} and \forme{ɯ-kʰo} `its house' in \ref{ex:Wkho.mWthasWphWt}).
A: word: kumpɣɤtɕɯ	 gloss: sparrow
B: word: nɯʑora	 gloss: 2PL
C: word: pɣɤtɕɯ	 gloss: bird
D: word: jaʁmɤzdoʁzdoʁ	 gloss: bird.sp.
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 127:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): iɕqʰa [pɣɤtɕɯ ___ kɤ-kɤ-ri] nɯ to-tɕɤt tɕe
Gloss (with missing item): the.aforementioned bird ___ AOR-OBJ:PCP-save DEM IFR-take.out LNK
The English translation of this sentence is:`He took out (from his bag) the bird whose life he had saved.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Possessors of objects can be relativized with object participial relatives (\ref{ex:pGAtCW.WsroR.kAkAri}) or finite relatives (\ref{ex:Wkho.mWthasWphWt}) exactly like direct objects (§\ref{sec:object.relativization}), but like subject possessors, they require the possessee to be overt and to bear a possessive prefix (\forme{the morpheme ___} `its life' in \ref{ex:pGAtCW.WsroR.kAkAri} and \forme{ɯ-kʰo} `its house' in \ref{ex:Wkho.mWthasWphWt}).
A: word: ɯ-sroʁ	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-life
B: word: nɤ-sroʁ	 gloss: 1SG.POSS-life
C: word: nɯ-mtɕʰi	 gloss: 3PL.POSS-mouth
D: word: a-sroʁ	 gloss: 1SG.POSS-life
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 128:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ ta-fsraŋ] nɯnɯ, [ɯ-kʰo mɯ-tʰa-sɯ-pʰɯt] nɯnɯra ɣɯ nɯ-rɟɤlpu (nɯ) kɯ, qro rcanɯ, stoŋtsu kɯmŋu ʑo jo-ɣɯt.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ AOR:3\flobv{}-protect DEM 3SG.POSS-hive NEG-AOR:3\flobv{}-CAUS-take.off DEM:PL GEN 3PL.POSS-king DEM ERG ant UNEXP:DEG thousand five EMPH IFR-bring
The English translation of this sentence is:`The queen (king) of the ants that he had saved, whose anthill he had saved from destruction (by his brothers), brought five thousand ants.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Possessors of objects can be relativized with object participial relatives (\ref{ex:pGAtCW.WsroR.kAkAri}) or finite relatives (\ref{ex:Wkho.mWthasWphWt}) exactly like direct objects (§\ref{sec:object.relativization}), but like subject possessors, they require the possessee to be overt and to bear a possessive prefix (\forme{ɯ-sroʁ} `its life' in \ref{ex:pGAtCW.WsroR.kAkAri} and \forme{ɯ-kʰo} `its house' in \ref{ex:Wkho.mWthasWphWt}).
A: word: paʁndza	 gloss: hogwash
B: word: ɕku	 gloss: allium
C: word: qrormbɯ	 gloss: anthill
D: word: qro	 gloss: ant
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 129:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [qro ta-fsraŋ] nɯnɯ, ___ mɯ-tʰa-sɯ-pʰɯt] nɯnɯra ɣɯ nɯ-rɟɤlpu (nɯ) kɯ, qro rcanɯ, stoŋtsu kɯmŋu ʑo jo-ɣɯt.
Gloss (with missing item): ant AOR:3\flobv{}-protect DEM ___ NEG-AOR:3\flobv{}-CAUS-take.off DEM:PL GEN 3PL.POSS-king DEM ERG ant UNEXP:DEG thousand five EMPH IFR-bring
The English translation of this sentence is:`The queen (king) of the ants that he had saved, whose anthill he had saved from destruction (by his brothers), brought five thousand ants.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Possessors of objects can be relativized with object participial relatives (\ref{ex:pGAtCW.WsroR.kAkAri}) or finite relatives (\ref{ex:Wkho.mWthasWphWt}) exactly like direct objects (§\ref{sec:object.relativization}), but like subject possessors, they require the possessee to be overt and to bear a possessive prefix (\forme{ɯ-sroʁ} `its life' in \ref{ex:pGAtCW.WsroR.kAkAri} and \forme{the morpheme ___} `its house' in \ref{ex:Wkho.mWthasWphWt}).
A: word: ɕɯ-kɤ-mɯrkɯ	 gloss: TRAL-INF-steal
B: word: <yazi>	 gloss: duck
C: word: ɯ-kʰo	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-hive
D: word: nɯ-kʰo	 gloss: 3PL.POSS-room
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 130:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): iɕqʰa ___ ɯ-sroʁ kɤ-kɤ-ri] nɯ to-tɕɤt tɕe
Gloss (with missing item): the.aforementioned ___ 3SG.POSS-life AOR-OBJ:PCP-save DEM IFR-take.out LNK
The English translation of this sentence is:`He took out (from his bag) the bird whose life he had saved.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Possessors of objects can be relativized with object participial relatives (\ref{ex:pGAtCW.WsroR.kAkAri}) or finite relatives (\ref{ex:Wkho.mWthasWphWt}) exactly like direct objects (§\ref{sec:object.relativization}), but like subject possessors, they require the possessee to be overt and to bear a possessive prefix (\forme{ɯ-sroʁ} `its life' in \ref{ex:pGAtCW.WsroR.kAkAri} and \forme{ɯ-kʰo} `its house' in \ref{ex:Wkho.mWthasWphWt}).
A: word: pɣɤtɕɯ	 gloss: bird
B: word: jaʁmɤzdoʁzdoʁ	 gloss: bird.sp.
C: word: ɯ-sɤtɕʰa	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-place
D: word: kumpɣɤtɕɯ	 gloss: sparrow
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 131:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): iɕqʰa [pɣɤtɕɯ ___ kɤ-kɤ-ri] nɯ to-tɕɤt tɕe
Gloss (with missing item): the.aforementioned bird ___ AOR-OBJ:PCP-save DEM IFR-take.out LNK
The English translation of this sentence is:`He took out (from his bag) the bird whose life he had saved.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Possessors of objects can be relativized with object participial relatives (\ref{ex:pGAtCW.WsroR.kAkAri}) or finite relatives (\ref{ex:Wkho.mWthasWphWt}) exactly like direct objects (§\ref{sec:object.relativization}), but like subject possessors, they require the possessee to be overt and to bear a possessive prefix (\forme{the morpheme ___} `its life' in \ref{ex:pGAtCW.WsroR.kAkAri} and \forme{ɯ-kʰo} `its house' in \ref{ex:Wkho.mWthasWphWt}).
A: word: a-sroʁ	 gloss: 1SG.POSS-life
B: word: ɯ-sroʁ	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-life
C: word: nɤ-sroʁ	 gloss: 1SG.POSS-life
D: word: tʂu	 gloss: path
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 132:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ ta-fsraŋ] nɯnɯ, [ɯ-kʰo mɯ-tʰa-sɯ-pʰɯt] nɯnɯra ɣɯ nɯ-rɟɤlpu (nɯ) kɯ, qro rcanɯ, stoŋtsu kɯmŋu ʑo jo-ɣɯt.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ AOR:3\flobv{}-protect DEM 3SG.POSS-hive NEG-AOR:3\flobv{}-CAUS-take.off DEM:PL GEN 3PL.POSS-king DEM ERG ant UNEXP:DEG thousand five EMPH IFR-bring
The English translation of this sentence is:`The queen (king) of the ants that he had saved, whose anthill he had saved from destruction (by his brothers), brought five thousand ants.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Possessors of objects can be relativized with object participial relatives (\ref{ex:pGAtCW.WsroR.kAkAri}) or finite relatives (\ref{ex:Wkho.mWthasWphWt}) exactly like direct objects (§\ref{sec:object.relativization}), but like subject possessors, they require the possessee to be overt and to bear a possessive prefix (\forme{ɯ-sroʁ} `its life' in \ref{ex:pGAtCW.WsroR.kAkAri} and \forme{ɯ-kʰo} `its house' in \ref{ex:Wkho.mWthasWphWt}).
A: word: qro	 gloss: ant
B: word: mɯ́j-spʰɯt	 gloss: NEG:SENS-can.cut
C: word: ɯ-βri	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-body
D: word: qrormbɯ	 gloss: anthill
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 133:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [qro ta-fsraŋ] nɯnɯ, ___ mɯ-tʰa-sɯ-pʰɯt] nɯnɯra ɣɯ nɯ-rɟɤlpu (nɯ) kɯ, qro rcanɯ, stoŋtsu kɯmŋu ʑo jo-ɣɯt.
Gloss (with missing item): ant AOR:3\flobv{}-protect DEM ___ NEG-AOR:3\flobv{}-CAUS-take.off DEM:PL GEN 3PL.POSS-king DEM ERG ant UNEXP:DEG thousand five EMPH IFR-bring
The English translation of this sentence is:`The queen (king) of the ants that he had saved, whose anthill he had saved from destruction (by his brothers), brought five thousand ants.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Possessors of objects can be relativized with object participial relatives (\ref{ex:pGAtCW.WsroR.kAkAri}) or finite relatives (\ref{ex:Wkho.mWthasWphWt}) exactly like direct objects (§\ref{sec:object.relativization}), but like subject possessors, they require the possessee to be overt and to bear a possessive prefix (\forme{ɯ-sroʁ} `its life' in \ref{ex:pGAtCW.WsroR.kAkAri} and \forme{the morpheme ___} `its house' in \ref{ex:Wkho.mWthasWphWt}).
A: word: tɯ-ɣjɤn	 gloss: one-time
B: word: <yazi>	 gloss: duck
C: word: ɯ-kʰo	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-hive
D: word: nɯ-kʰo	 gloss: 3PL.POSS-room
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 134:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ [wuma tu-mbro] mɤ-kɯ-cʰa] ci ŋu tɕe,
Gloss (with missing item): ___ really IPFV-be.high NEG-SBJ:PCP-can INDEF be:FACT LNK
The English translation of this sentence is:`It is a tree that cannot grow very high.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The subject participle of the semi-tranthe morpheme ___tive \japhug{cʰa}{can} can be used to relativize the subject of the complement clause, when it is at the same time subject of \forme{cʰa} itself, as in (\ref{ex:tumbro.mAkWcha}) or in (\ref{WkukWndWn.kWcha}) below (§\ref{sec:relativization.complement.type}).
A: word: kɯ-ɤ-rtsi	 gloss: SBJ:PCP-PASS-count
B: word: tʂu	 gloss: path
C: word: sɯkɤku	 gloss: treetop
D: word: si	 gloss: tree
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 135:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [aʑo [kɤ-mto] pɯ-rɲo-t-a] ___ ci tu tɕe,
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG INF-see AOR-experience-PST:TR-1SG ___ INDEF exist:FACT LNK
The English translation of this sentence is:`There is a girl whom I saw before and....'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: To relativize the direct object of a transitive verb in the complement clause, the com\-ple\-ment-taking verb can be in finite form (\ref{ex:kAmto.pWrYota}) or in object participle form (\ref{ex:kAmtsWG.pWkArYo}), as if the complement-internal objects were the direct objects of the main verb of the relative clause (§\ref{sec:object.relativization}).
A: word: tɤɕime	 gloss: young.lady
B: word: tɕʰemɤpɯ	 gloss: girl
C: word: mbrɯtɕɯ	 gloss: knife
D: word: tɕʰemɤ-pɯ	 gloss: girl-DIM
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 136:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [[ʁmɤrɲɯɣ kɯ kɤ-mtsɯɣ] pɯ-kɤ-rɲo] ___ nɯ
Gloss (with missing item): mosquito ERG INF-bite AOR-OBJ:PCP-experience ___ DEM
The English translation of this sentence is:`Someone who has been stung by mosquitoes before'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: To relativize the direct object of a transitive verb in the complement clause, the com\-ple\-ment-taking verb can be in finite form (\ref{ex:kAmto.pWrYota}) or in object participle form (\ref{ex:kAmtsWG.pWkArYo}), as if the complement-internal objects were the direct objects of the main verb of the relative clause (§\ref{sec:object.relativization}).
A: word: ndzrɯ	 gloss: chisel
B: word: a-tɯrme	 gloss: 1SG.POSS-man
C: word: tɯrme	 gloss: person
D: word: ʁnɤ-rʑaʁ	 gloss: two-night
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 137:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [[ʁmɤrɲɯɣ kɯ kɤ-mtsɯɣ] pɯ-kɤ-rɲo] ___ nɯ
Gloss (with missing item): mosquito ERG INF-bite AOR-OBJ:PCP-experience ___ DEM
The English translation of this sentence is:`Someone who has been stung by mosquitoes before'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The contrast between \forme{pɯ-kɯ-rɲo} in (\ref{ex:kACe.pWkWrYo}) and \forme{pɯ-kɤ-rɲo} (\ref{ex:kAmtsWG.pWkArYo}) is not as straightforward as it might seem at first glance. The transitive verb \forme{rɲo} lacks non-generic inverse forms, and treats both subjects and objects of its velar infinitive clauses in the same way as transitive subject in the matrix clause, both in terms of indexation and flagging (§\ref{sec:rYo.complements}).
A: word: tɯrme	 gloss: person
B: word: a-tɯrme	 gloss: 1SG.POSS-man
C: word: tu-sɯ-βze	 gloss: IPFV-CAUS-make[III]
D: word: tɤ-rɟit	 gloss: INDEF.POSS-child
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A