cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 153:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tɕe nɯra [pɯ\redp{}pɯ-kɯ-fse] nɯra, [<yazi> tɤ-kɤ-mɯrkɯ, tɤ-kɤ-ndza], qʰe ɕɤr tɕe ___ tɤ-kɯ-rɤʑa] qʰe, [ɯ-βri tɕe iɕqʰa, <yazi> ɣɯ ɯ-muj nɯ-kɯ-ɬoʁ], nɯra pjɤ-fɕɤt.
Gloss (with missing item): LNK DEM:PL TOTAL\redp{}PST.IPFV-SBJ:PCP-be.like DEM:PL duck AOR-OBJ:PCP-steal AOR-OBJ:PCP-eat LNK evening LOC ___ AOR-SBJ:PCP-itch LNK 3SG.POSS-body LOC the.aforementioned duck GEN 3SG.POSS-feather AOR-SBJ:PCP-come.out DEM:PL IFR-tell
The English translation of this sentence is:`He told [the old man] everything that had happened, about the duck that he had stolen and eaten, and his body itching, and the duck feathers that had grown on it.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: However, the problem with analyzing these clauses as infinitival complement clauses is that the intransitive motion verb \japhug{ɬoʁ}{come out}, being dynamic, never takes a \forme{kɤ-} infinitive, and that the form \forme{nɯ-kɯ-ɬoʁ} can only be a subject participle `(something) that has come out'. For this reason, the non-finite clauses in (\ref{ex:yazi.tAkAmWrkW}) have to be analyzed as head-internal and headless (object and subject) participial relative clauses.
A: word: kʰɤndɯn	 gloss: recitation
B: word: nɯ-skʰrɯ	 gloss: 3PL.POSS-body
C: word: ɯ-βri	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-body
D: word: cʰɯ-βri-nɯ	 gloss: IPFV-protect-PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 154:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tɕe nɯra [pɯ\redp{}pɯ-kɯ-fse] nɯra, [<yazi> tɤ-kɤ-mɯrkɯ, tɤ-kɤ-ndza], qʰe ɕɤr tɕe [ɯ-βri tɤ-kɯ-rɤʑa] qʰe, [ɯ-βri tɕe iɕqʰa, <yazi> ɣɯ ___ nɯ-kɯ-ɬoʁ], nɯra pjɤ-fɕɤt.
Gloss (with missing item): LNK DEM:PL TOTAL\redp{}PST.IPFV-SBJ:PCP-be.like DEM:PL duck AOR-OBJ:PCP-steal AOR-OBJ:PCP-eat LNK evening LOC 3SG.POSS-body AOR-SBJ:PCP-itch LNK 3SG.POSS-body LOC the.aforementioned duck GEN ___ AOR-SBJ:PCP-come.out DEM:PL IFR-tell
The English translation of this sentence is:`He told [the old man] everything that had happened, about the duck that he had stolen and eaten, and his body itching, and the duck feathers that had grown on it.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: However, the problem with analyzing these clauses as infinitival complement clauses is that the intransitive motion verb \japhug{ɬoʁ}{come out}, being dynamic, never takes a \forme{kɤ-} infinitive, and that the form \forme{nɯ-kɯ-ɬoʁ} can only be a subject participle `(something) that has come out'. For this reason, the non-finite clauses in (\ref{ex:yazi.tAkAmWrkW}) have to be analyzed as head-internal and headless (object and subject) participial relative clauses.
A: word: ɯ-muj	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-feather
B: word: nɯ-muj	 gloss: 3PL.POSS-feather
C: word: tu-z-rɤme	 gloss: IPFV-CAUS-work[III]
D: word: rɯdaʁ	 gloss: animal
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 155:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ kɯ-ɣɤwu] ʑo kɤ-nɯɕpɯz mɤ-spe-a ma nɯ mɯma spe-a
Gloss (with missing item): ___ SBJ:PCP-cry EMPH INF-imitate NEG-be.able[III]:FACT-1SG LNK DEM apart.from be.able[III]:FACT-1SG
The English translation of this sentence is:`I cannot imitate a child crying, but apart from that I can imitate [anything].'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Second, these verbs can occur with a participial clause whose subject is overt and different from the subject of the verb of the matrix clause, as in (\ref{ex:tApAtso.kWGAwu.kAnWCpWz}) where \japhug{the morpheme ___}{child} is the subject of the verb \japhug{ɣɤwu}{cry} in the participial clause, but not the subject of \japhug{nɯɕpɯz}{pretend}, `disguise as', `imitate' (§\ref{sec:constr.participial.clause}). Such a subject mismatch would be completely ungrammatical with a purposive clause.
A: word: tɤ-pɤtso_i	 gloss: INDEF.POSS-child
B: word: tɤ-tɕɯ	 gloss: INDEF.POSS-son
C: word: tɤ-pɤtso	 gloss: INDEF.POSS-child
D: word: qajɯ	 gloss: bug
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 156:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tɕe ___ kɯ-mŋɤm] to-nɯɕpɯz
Gloss (with missing item): LNK ___ SBJ:PCP-hurt IFR-pretend
The English translation of this sentence is:`He pretended to feel pain in his leg.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Third, we find examples like (\ref{ex:Wmi.kWmNAm.tonWCpWznW}) where the subject of the verb in the main clause is not coreferent with the subject of the participial clause but with the possessor of the subject. These cases can be accounted for as possessor relative clauses (§\ref{sec:subject.participle.other.relative}, §\ref{sec:S.possessor.relativization}): (\ref{ex:Wmi.kWmNAm.tonWCpWznW}) could thus be literally translated as `he pretended to be someone whose leg hurt'.
A: word: nɯ-mi	 gloss: 3PL.POSS-leg
B: word: ɯ-kɤχcɤl	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-top.head
C: word: ku-oz-nɤma	 gloss: PRS-PROG-do
D: word: ɯ-mi	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-leg
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 157:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tɕe ___ kɯ-mŋɤm] to-nɯɕpɯz
Gloss (with missing item): LNK ___ SBJ:PCP-hurt IFR-pretend
The English translation of this sentence is:`He pretended to feel pain in his leg.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Third, we find examples like (\ref{ex:Wmi.kWmNAm.tonWCpWznW}) where the subject of the verb in the main clause is not coreferent with the subject of the participial clause but with the possessor of the subject. These cases can be accounted for as possessor relative clauses (§\ref{sec:subject.participle.other.relative}, §\ref{sec:S.possessor.relativization}): (\ref{ex:Wmi.kWmNAm.tonWCpWznW}) could thus be literally translated as `he pretended to be someone whose leg hurt'.
A: word: ku-tɯ-rɤʑi-ndʑi	 gloss: IPFV-2-stay-DU
B: word: tɯrme	 gloss: people
C: word: ɯ-mi	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-leg
D: word: nɯ-mi	 gloss: 3PL.POSS-leg
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 158:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [[``nɯ ___ ɲɯ-ra"] tɤ-tɯ-tɯt] nɯ tɤ-stu-t-a ŋu
Gloss (with missing item): DEM ___ SENS-be.needed AOR-2-say[II] DEM AOR-do.like-PST:TR-1SG be:FACT
The English translation of this sentence is:`I did it [the way that] you said should be done.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In view of (\ref{ex:tWtatWt.tostu}), it is tempting to analyze the clause \forme{``nɯ the morpheme ___ ɲɯ-ra" tɤ-tɯ-tɯt} `(that) you said ``it should be (done) like that'' in (\ref{ex:YWra.tAtWtWt.nW}), which occurs in the same syntactic context, as a finite object relative clause too, differing from that of (\ref{ex:tWtatWt.tostu}) by being head-internal (§\ref{sec:head-internal.relative}) instead of headless.
A: word: a-tɤ-fse-a	 gloss: IRR-PFV-be.like-1SG
B: word: a-tɤ-fse	 gloss: IRR-PFV-be.like
C: word: a-pɯ-ŋu	 gloss: IRR-PFV-be
D: word: ɯ-tɤɲi	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-staff
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 159:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [[``nɯ a-tɤ-fse ___ tɤ-tɯ-tɯt] nɯ tɤ-stu-t-a ŋu
Gloss (with missing item): DEM IRR-PFV-be.like ___ AOR-2-say[II] DEM AOR-do.like-PST:TR-1SG be:FACT
The English translation of this sentence is:`I did it [the way that] you said should be done.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In view of (\ref{ex:tWtatWt.tostu}), it is tempting to analyze the clause \forme{``nɯ a-tɤ-fse the morpheme ___ tɤ-tɯ-tɯt} `(that) you said ``it should be (done) like that'' in (\ref{ex:YWra.tAtWtWt.nW}), which occurs in the same syntactic context, as a finite object relative clause too, differing from that of (\ref{ex:tWtatWt.tostu}) by being head-internal (§\ref{sec:head-internal.relative}) instead of headless.
A: word: ɲɯ-ra	 gloss: SENS-need
B: word: ɲɯ-ra'	 gloss: SENS-need
C: word: ɲɯ-ra"	 gloss: SENS-be.needed
D: word: ɯ-sɤtɕʰa	 gloss: 3SG.POSS-place
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 160:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [[``nɯ ___ ɲɯ-ra"] tɤ-tɯ-tɯt] nɯ tɤ-stu-t-a ŋu
Gloss (with missing item): DEM ___ SENS-be.needed AOR-2-say[II] DEM AOR-do.like-PST:TR-1SG be:FACT
The English translation of this sentence is:`I did it [the way that] you said should be done.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: What is remarkable about the construction in (\ref{ex:YWra.tAtWtWt.nW}) is that the relativized element is not a noun, but the (object) complement clause \forme{nɯ the morpheme ___ ɲɯ-ra} `it should be (done) like that', embedded within the relative.
A: word: a-tɤ-fse	 gloss: IRR-PFV-be.like
B: word: a-pɯ-ŋu	 gloss: IRR-PFV-be
C: word: nɤ-wa	 gloss: 2SG.POSS-father
D: word: a-tɤ-fse-a	 gloss: IRR-PFV-be.like-1SG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 161:
You are a linguist specializing in Japhug. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [[``nɯ a-tɤ-fse ___ tɤ-tɯ-tɯt] nɯ tɤ-stu-t-a ŋu
Gloss (with missing item): DEM IRR-PFV-be.like ___ AOR-2-say[II] DEM AOR-do.like-PST:TR-1SG be:FACT
The English translation of this sentence is:`I did it [the way that] you said should be done.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: What is remarkable about the construction in (\ref{ex:YWra.tAtWtWt.nW}) is that the relativized element is not a noun, but the (object) complement clause \forme{nɯ a-tɤ-fse ɲɯ-ra} `it should be (done) like that', embedded within the relative.
A: word: qajɯ	 gloss: bug
B: word: ɲɯ-ra"	 gloss: SENS-be.needed
C: word: ɲɯ-ra'	 gloss: SENS-need
D: word: ɲɯ-ra	 gloss: SENS-need
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B