Project: Tarantool (App Definition and Development / Database)
File: CONTRIBUTING.md

You likely come here from the issues or pull requests page. There are some suggestions on how to make your contribution most useful. Consider using a bug report/feature request template. Feel free to adapt it for your needs. You can opt out and start from a blank issue, but be mindful of the completeness of the information. There are feature requests of different kinds: A complement to existing functionality or another ready-to-implement request. A new idea or something else that requires a discussion. The former is completely okay to be asked via an issue. For the latter kind of a request consider opening a discussion in the category. It helps to keep the issue tracker actual and clean rather than a bag of thoughts. Questions could be asked in discussions in the category. There are many aspects which a programmer should take care of. Here is a short list of simple rules, which aims to reduce ping-pong between a developer and a reviewer. Target a pull request to the `master` branch. Don't forget to: Add a . Follow suggestions from the document. Add a into the commit message. Example: ``` @TarantoolBot document Title: One-line title Description that can be multiline, contain markup and links. ``` Add a test (as for a feature, as well as for a bugfix). Prefer `luatest` over other test types. Add `NOCHANGELOG=<reason>`, `NODOC=<reason>`, and/or `NO_TEST=<reason>` into a commit message if some of those bullets are not applicable. Every commit in a patchset is validated against those rules. Adhere rules. Highlights: Describe a reason of the change, why it is necessary (see rule 8). The real reason. Bad example: 'it reaches end-of-life'. Good example: 'it reaches end-of-life and its support is problematic due to the following problems: X, Y, Z'. Follow 50/72 rule (see rules 2 and 7). 50 chars length for the title is not a strict requirement, but a good soft limit. 72 chars for the commit body is the strict requirement for a prose text, but it can be overrun for listings such as code or logs. Look at the code around and mimic the style. If in doubt, consult with the style guides for and . Don't hesitate to ask for help. If you have doubts, highlight them for a reviewer in the commit message, the pull request description or pull request comments. Wait for CI and fix all problems. Glance on the output if the CI job is red. If there are test fails that look irrelevant to the changes, highlight this fact in the pull request comments. Once you received a review, follow the next suggestions to make the process comfortable for everyone: Don't add fixup commits on top of the initial patchset. Squash fixups into appropriate commits and force-push your branch. Your patchset will land to `master` as is, without any squashing or reformatting. Keep it in a good shape. React to comments and respond with a summary of changes. If you disagree with a comment, describe your arguments or doubts. Work in iterations. Either process all comments at once or mark a pull request as a draft and return it back when all comments will be answered. A reviewer always wants to just look and say 'everything is nice' rather than request changes and remind about forgotten things. If you reached out of spare time, mark the pull request as draft or close it. -- if you search for a task to learn Tarantool's code. -- more detailed recommendations how to make nice patches. -- what else goes on around Tarantool and how to get involved.