Laryngeal Applications of Platelet Rich Plasma and Platelet Poor Plasma: A Systematic Review

Abstract Background Platelet rich plasma (PRP) and platelet poor plasma (PPP) are regenerative therapies that offer the potential for improving care for disorders of the larynx. The laryngeal applications of these substances have been examined in both animals and humans. The goal of this systematic review is to examine the various applications of PRP and PPP in laryngology, assess the protocols for preparation and application of these substances and evaluate the outcomes and complications in both humans and animals. Methods A search of PUBMED was conducted in April 2021 using combinations of keywords of “platelet rich plasma” and “platelet poor plasma” with keywords such as “larynx,” “vocal folds,” “laryngology,” and others. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRIMSA) guidelines were followed. Articles were reviewed by two independent coauthors and included based on selection criteria pertinent to the goals of this study. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed by two independent co-authors using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Randomized Controlled Trials and JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies. Data regarding the pathologies treated using PRP and PPP, PRP, and PPP preparation protocols, application protocols, human voice outcomes, histopathological animal outcomes, and complications were extracted from each of the studies and presented in tables. Results Seven studies were included based on the selection criteria. PRP or PPP were used for vocal fold scar, sulcus, atrophy and palsy; acute vocal fold injury; glottic insufficiency, and graft healing. PRP or PPP were derived from autologous blood in a one- or two-step centrifugation process and administered via injection, soaking of cartilage grafts or topical application. Mean and median voice handicap index-10 (VHI-10) and voice handicap index (VHI) scores decreased following PRP or PPP injections in two human studies and one human study showed a similar VHI-10 score before and after PRP treatment. Videostroboscopy showed the absence of injection site reactions and at least temporary improvement in glottic gap or vibratory function following treatment in some patients. Other objective measures of voice outcomes in human studies showed improved phonatory function in the one-to-four-month period following PRP or PPP injections, with some patients experiencing a subjective decrease or return to baseline in phonatory function following the initial improvement period. Animal studies found elevated levels of growth factors, organized collagen deposition, decreased granulation tissue, increased vascularization, and increased cartilage proliferation in PRP treated laryngeal tissue. Discussion PRP and PPP might have the potential to be safely used in the larynx and at least temporarily influence wound healing and vocal function. Further study using comparable outcome measurement tools is required to assess their role and efficacy in treating acute vocal fold injury, chronic vocal fold pathologies, graft healing, and other laryngeal applications.