The induction of hapten-specific immunological tolerance and immunity in B lymphocytes. V. Evidence for b-cell deletion in vitro with serum from tolerant mice.

Abstract The serum from mice that had been rendered specifically tolerant (TolS) to the trinitrophenyl (TNP) hapten by the injection of trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS) is effective in the in vitro induction of immunological unresponsiveness in murine spleen cells. This tolerance system was investigated with particular emphasis upon the mode of induction. The observed inhibition by TolS of responses to the thymic-independent (TI) antigen TNP-lipopolysaccharide (TNP-LPS) was stable following adoptive transfer to lethally irradiated recipients and was due neither to the delay of in vitro responsiveness nor to effector cell blockade at the level of the antibody-forming cell. Neither suppressor cells nor cell-bound tolerogen carry-over were responsible for the tolerance induced by TolS. TNP-LPS doses, including a wide range of polyclonal activating concentrations, were ineffective in reversing the unresponsive state induced by cocultivation with TolS. Additionally, unconjugated LPS in either fetal calf serum (FCS)-containing or FCS-free cultures did not break tolerance. This failure of polyclonal activating substances to reverse the unresponsive state suggests that blockade of TNP-specific receptors is not the mechanism of tolerogenesis, since such compounds trigger cells polyclonally through nonimmunoglobulin receptors. Tolerance induced by incubation of spleen cells with TolS for 24 hr followed by extensive washing was stable whether the immunogenic stimulus was the TI antigen TNP-LPS or the thymic-dependent (TD) form of the hapten, TNP-sheep erythrocytes (TNP-SRC). Washing spleen cells at elevated temperatures after preculturing with TolS to avoid possible reassociation of surface Ig (sIg)-bound TNP conjugates did not lead to escape from tolerance. Antigen-free incubation for 24 hr following cultivation with TolS was equally unsuccessful in reversing the unresponsive state. Thus, extensive washing following tolerance induction and antigen-free cultivation where unblocking or turnover and resynthesis of sIg receptors should have taken place provided no support for receptor blockade as the mode of in vitro induction and maintenance of tolerance by TolS. Treatment with the proteolytic enzyme pronase with the intention of removing potential tolerogen from the cell surface revealed a stable tolerant state. Incubation with anti-Ig or anti-TNP antisera under conditions designed to allow capping and removal of sIg-bound tolerogen or surface-bound TNP conjugates also failed to reverse the tolerance induced by incubation with TolS. The results presented here and previously lend no support to active or passive suppression or blockade of reactive cells as the mechanism of tolerance induction in vitro by TolS. The data are consistent with the hypothesis that TolS-induced unresponsiveness is due to a functional deletion of TNP-specific B lymphocytes. Furthermore, the similarities observed between the induction of tolerance by TNBS injection and TolS-induced unresponsiveness are consistent with the suggestion that TNBS-induced tolerance in vivo is mediated by a component of TolS which is active as a tolerogen in vitro .