Unsupported conclusions in the article "Synephrine-containing dietary supplement precipitating apical ballooning syndrome in a young female"

To the Editor, The article entitled "Synephrine-containing dietary supplement precipitating apical ballooning syndrome in a young female" by Chung et al. [1] contains scientifically unsupported assumptions and unsubstantiated conclusions regarding p-synephrine, the primary protoalkaloid present in Citrus aurantium (bitter orange). No evidence is provided that there is a causal relationship between p-synephrine and the observed syndrome. Furthermore, the authors failed to review current scientific literature regarding p-synephrine and extracts of C. aurantium. No serious adverse events have ever been directly attributable to C. aurantium extract and p-synephrine [2,3,4]. The authors purport that apical ballooning syndrome was caused by a product that contained synephrine and caffeine, stating that the subject had been taking dietary supplements containing these ingredients. The authors have provided no evidence or information substantiating their claim. The authors do not indicate how many different dietary supplements were being taken, the names of the products, the actual compositions of the products, the amounts of the various ingredients in the products, how much of the products were being taken by the subject, and the conditions under which the supplements were being taken. There is no evidence directly linking supplement use with the observed syndrome. As a consequence, it is not possible to establish a cause and effect relationship. Case reports are frequently and inappropriately cited as unequivocal evidence that dangerous adverse effects or herb-drug interactions have occurred. It should be clearly noted that "case reports are incomplete, uncontrolled, retrospective, lack operational criteria for identifying when an adverse event actually occurred, and resemble nothing so much as hearsay evidence, a type of evidence that is prohibited in all courts in all of industrialized societies" [5]. The authors [1] state that the toxicity of synephrine is largely unknown, especially in combination with caffeine. The authors did not cite recent reviews that have been published with respect to the safety of p-synephrine and C. aurantium extracts in animals and humans and their efficacy in humans [3,4,6,7]. Over 20 human published and unpublished human clinical studies have been conducted which demonstrate that bitter orange extract and p-synephrine alone and in combination with other ingredients support modest weight loss in conjunction with diet and exercise without significant adverse effects being observed [4]. The majority of the subjects in these studies were overweight/obese, and a large percent of the subjects consumed caffeine (up to 528 mg/day) in combination with p-synephrine (up to 80 mg/day) [4]. Intertek-Cantox, a global leader in toxicology and regulatory services. It is known for its conservative approach to dietary supplements, its reports are widely used as a basis for making recommendations regarding the use and safety of supplements. Intertek-Cantox conducted a detailed scientific literature review and issued a report on C. aurantium extract and p-synephrine consumption in combination with caffeine [6]. The Report states that "p-synephrine is unlikely to have significant effects on inotropy, vasoconstriction, or blood pressure." The report further states that the following dosages are "not likely to cause adverse effects": up to 70 mg p-synephrine alone or 40 mg in combination with 320 mg of caffeine; and If taken as divided doses spaced out over the course of the day, 100 mg of p-synephrine alone or 70 mg p-synephrine in combination with 400 mg caffeine [6]. The Natural Health Products Directorate of Health Canada has conducted an extensive review of C. aurantium and p-synephrine, and in May 2011 released a 49 page health risk assessment report on p-synephrine and caffeine and defined its current guidelines for the use of these natural ingredients [7]. Health Canada approved the use of up to 50 mg per day of p-synephrine alone in healthy adults, and 40 mg per day or less of p-synephrine when combined with 320 mg per day or less of caffeine. Health Canada is the equivalent of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The authors [1] assume that because p-synephrine has structural similarities to various amines as epinephrine, amphetamine and ephedrine that it will de facto exert similar effects. The structural (stereochemical) differences between p-synephrine relative to other biogenic amines as epinephrine, ephedrine and m-synephrine result in markedly different adrenergic receptor binding and pharmacokinetic characteristics, and therefore significantly different pharmacological properties [8]. The properties of other phenethylamines and phenpropylamines cannot be extrapolated to p-synephrine based on some structural similarities. Contrary to the general statements of the authors [1] regarding sympathomimetic actions and cardiovascular effects, p-synephrine exhibits little or no binding to α-, and β-1 and β-2 adrenergic receptors which is essential to producing cardiovascular effects [8]. This lack of adrenergic receptor binding readily explains the observed lack of cardiovascular effects of p-synephrine. The authors did not include any dosing information [1], and therefore it is not possible to make meaningful comparisons with published studies. In a recently completed double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 46 healthy human subjects were given bitter orange extract (49 mg p-synephrine) twice a day (total of 98 mg/day of p-synephrine) for 60 days, while 23 subjects received the placebo [9]. No cardiovascular effects were observed nor were there any adverse effects with respect to blood chemistries or blood cell counts with differentials, indicating a high degree of safety of these ingredients. The safety of C. aurantium and p-synephrine was examined in a human placebo-controlled, double blind, cross-over study where subjects were given 49 mg p-synephrine daily for 15 days [10]. p-Synephrine did not exert any significant effects on heart rate, blood pressure, electrocardiograms, blood cell counts, or blood chemistries or enzymes over the 15 days of the study. Finally, the authors appear to be unaware that various orange juices have been shown to contain up to 20 to 25 mg p-synephrine per quarter liter [11,12], concentrations that exceed the amounts of p-synephrine in many dietary supplements. p-Synephrine is consumed on a daily basis in the form of juices and orange-related food products as marmalades alone and in combination with caffeine from beverages as coffee and tea without adverse events. In summary, the authors have omitted critical details of the case, made unsupported extrapolations, failed to appropriately review the scientific literature, and arrived at conclusions that lack scientific support or merit. Contrary to their assertions, there is little that is similar between p-synephrine and ephedrine with respect to pharmacokinetic properties, adrenergic receptor binding, and pharmacological and toxicological effects.