Assessing asthma in African American children using the Asthma Control Test and the Childhood Asthma Control Test.

African Americans disproportionally experience uncontrolled asthma1. Because asthma control is now the focus of asthma management,2 publicly available questionnaires like the Asthma Control Test™ (ACT)3 and childhood Asthma Control Test (ACTc)4 represent the most accessible, standardized, non-physician methods of assessing control and are typically considered cost-effective and easily implemented asthma care strategies for primary care offices. Both the ACT (≥12 years old) and ACTc (<12 years old) query asthma symptoms over the past four weeks and use a cutpoint of ≤ 19 for not well-controlled asthma3–4. Because neither questionnaire has been validated in African American children5–10, we sought to determine whether the ACT and the ACTc are appropriate screening tools for asthma control in this population. This retrospective study was approved by the University of North Carolina Institutional Review Board. From a list maintained by an asthma educator for all pediatric asthma patients seen either at the pulmonology or allergy/immunology clinics, we reviewed the medical record and included data from all children who met the following inclusion criteria: self-identified African-American, ages 5–18, and had at least 2 visits for which ACT/c and spirometry were both performed between January 1, 2011 and November 1, 2013. Fifty-seven children were identified. The primary author reviewed charts from each visit and determined physician-assessment of asthma control by either 1) provider’s written explicit determination of control or, if this were not available, 2) reviewing medication management strategies (classifying continuation of current management or de-escalation of therapy as “well-controlled” and the escalation of therapy as “not well-controlled”). Although investigators were not blinded to spirometry and ACT/c scores, these values were, in most cases, collected by a second investigator independent of chart review for asthma control. By this method, we collected a total of 130 observations/visits with 84 visits in 41 children ≥12 years old (45 well-controlled visits and 39 not well-controlled visits by MD assessment) and 46 visits in 22 children 19 with physician assessment of control using measures of sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen’s kappa. A receiver-operating curve was used to determine the best ACT cutpoint for assessment of control in this population. A logistic regression model was used with ‘control by physician’ as the dependent variable and ‘ACT score’ as the independent variable. This model included as potential confounders FEV1 and FEV1/FVC (dichotomized at 80%) and age of the child (age <12 or ≥12) as a potential moderator of the effect of ACT score. These models also included a random intercept effect for child in order to account for the correlation among the repeated measures in a child. Adolescents ages 12–18 years with controlled asthma by physician assessment had higher ACT scores than those without controlled asthma (p 19 was strongly associated with physician-assessment of control in this group (Fisher’s exact 80% (kappa=0.20, p=0.0317). Figure 1 Receiver operating curve showing ACT scores compared to MD control assessment in children ≥12yo. When reviewing the entire data set of children ages 5–18 years old, logistic regression demonstrated that higher ACT scores are associated with increased odds of one’s asthma being classified as controlled by MD assessment (p=0.0001). However, older age (being ≥12 compared to 19 for asthma control using the ACTc was not associated with physician assessment of control (Fisher’s exact=0.3883) and did not agree with spirometry-measured control defined by FEV1>80% (kappa=0.34, p=0.0095). Additionally, a cutpoint of >19 only had a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 64% in these younger children. In this study, we demonstrate that the ACTc as currently used may not accurately predict asthma control in African American children < 12-years-old, showing limited functionality in this group with low sensitivity and specificity for mirroring the gold standard of physician assessment of asthma control. Surprisingly, this points to a clear discrepancy between caregiver and provider perception of asthma control in children < 12 years old. While the ACTc queries both child and caregiver, greater weight is given to those caregiver-answered questions. Hence, failure of a caregiver to recognize not well-controlled asthma has implications for impacting asthma treatment plans and may also contribute to the increased risks of morbidity and mortality associated with uncontrolled asthma in this population. Although the ACT had better performance in children ≥12-years-old (who do fill out their own questionnaires), we also found that sensitivity for determining asthma control could be increased by changing the ACT cutpoint to 18 rather than >19 (with a previously reported sensitivity of 71.3% and specificity of 70.8% in a primarily Caucasian population6). Limitations to our study include its retrospective nature, small sample size, unknown impact of socioeconomic status or the nature of the visit (scheduled versus urgent care), and possible investigator bias (non-blinding to ACT/c and spirometry results). Overall, our results suggest that current use of the ACT and ACTc may require adjustment to better correlate with physician assessment of asthma control in African American children. Additional prospective studies are required to further explore these findings and inform alternate clinical practice standards.