Expression of stress proteins and lymphocyte reactivity in heterotopic cardiac allografts undergoing cellular rejection

Abstract This report addresses the concept that, during rejection, the allograft undergoes a stress response which leads to an increased expression of stress proteins, also called heat shock proteins (hsp), and the recruitment and activation of hsp-reactive lymphocytes. Recent studies in our laboratory have have provided evidence that hsp-reactive T-cells are present in cardiac allografts undergoing rejection. In this study, an MHC incompatible heterotopic heart allograft model (ACI into LEW) was chosen to analyse the kinetics of hsp expression during the development of rejection. Allografts and syngrafts (LEW into LEW) were harvested every day during the first 5 days post-transplant. Immunoblot analysis of proteins extracted from graft stromal tissues was done with murine monoclonal antibodies (mAb) against various mammalian hsp. Proliferation studies were done to determine hsp reactivity of graft-infiltrating lymphocytes on different days post-transplant. Three types of stressful stimuli appeared to increase hsp expression in the allograft. The first was a physiological stress secondary to the trauma of the transplant procedure and ischaemia/reperfusion injury and this would occur in allogeneic and syngeneic grafts. During the first day after transplantation, both types of grafts showed higher expression of hsp72 and grp78 and to a lesser extent, hsp60 and grp75. On the second and third day, the expression of grp78 and grp96 was higher in allografts than in syngrafts and this may reflect an immunologically mediated stress response in the allograft when infiltrating hsp-reactive lymphocytes became first detectable in the allograft. The third type of stress appeared related to the inflammatory process associated with rejection. On the fourth and fifth day post-transplant, the allografts showed strong expression of at least five proteins of lower molecular mass reacting with hsp-specific mAbs; namely, ≈40 kDa (detected by anti-hsp60), ≈30 kDa (by anti-hsp72), ≈45 kDa and ≈32 kDa (by anti-hsp72 + hsc73), and ≈50 kDa (by anti-grp78). At that time, the allograft began to show progressive inflammatory changes and tissue damage. The appearance of lower molecular mass hsp-crossreactive proteins might reflect a degradation of hsps which had increased expression earlier during the post-transplant period. This process may generate large quantities of hsp-derived peptides which may be presented by MHC molecules to graft-infiltrating T-cells. Another interpretation of the strong expression of lower molecular bands in later allografts is that they represent other stress proteins that crossreact with antibodies against hsp60 and hsp70 family members. These findings provide further support of the concept that, during rejection, the allograft undergoes a stress response which increases the expression of hsp and promotes the recruitment and activation of hsp-reactive lymphocytes to augment the immunologically mediated inflammatory processes. Both hsp60 and hsp70 families are involved. While lymphocyte reactivity was originally determined with mycobacterial hsp preparations, this study provides the first evidence that allograft lymphocytes react with mammalian grp78 which has structural homology and immunological crossreactivity with mycobacterial hsp70.