Histamine-induced suppressor factor (HSF): Further studies on the nature of the stimulus and the cell which produces it

Abstract Guinea pig lymphocytes are stimulated by histamine to produce a soluble factor with immunosuppressive properties. This factor, termed histamine-induced suppressor factor or HSF, abrogates the production of migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and proliferative response to specific antigen. In the present study we have determined the lymphocyte subpopulation which elaborates HSF, the lymphoid tissue source, the kinetics of its generation in relation to immunization, and the nature of the histamine receptor involved in modification of the release of HSF. HSF activity could be detected in populations of cells from spleen and lymph nodes prior to active immunization of the donor, but not in cells from the donor's blood or thymus. Following immunization with ortho -chloro benzoyl-bovine γ-globulin in complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA), more HSF activity was detected in cells from the donor's spleen and lymph nodes. The peak response was seen 2 weeks postimmunization when significant amounts of HSF also were made by cells from the blood and thymus. Concentrations of T-cell-enriched and B-cell-enriched populations were tested for their ability to make HSF. We found that T-cell-enriched, but not B-cell-enriched populations, made significant amounts of HSF. Cells from the lymph nodes of immunized donors were chromatographed over affinity columns made of insolubilized conjugates of histamine with albumin. The nonretained cells were unable to generate HSF, whereas HSF activity was detected in the cells that were retained by the columns. This finding strongly suggests that the HSF-producing cells have receptors for histamine. Cells from CFA-immune lymph nodes were incubated with H 1 (2-methyl histamine) and H 2 (4-methyl histamine) agonists to determine their relative potency and, therefore, the nature of the histamine receptors on these cells that were modifying HSF release. Although both agonists could induce generation of HSF when high concentrations (10 −3 M ) were used, only the H 2 agonist stimulated production or release of HSF at lower concentrations (10 −5 M ). These HSF-producing cells appear to be selectively sensitive to H 2 agonists and likely have a predominance of H 2 receptors. Allergic mediators other than histamine were studied to determine their ability to allow elaboration of HSF-like activity from CFA-immune lymph node cells. Serotonin (10 −3 M ), slow-reacting substance of anaphylaxis (100 units/ml), eosinophil chemotactic factor (tetrapeptide; 10 −5 M ), and prostaglandin E 1 (10 −4 M ) were unable to induce HSF-like activity in lymph node cells from donors immunized with CFA. Furthermore, other agents which raise intracellular levels of cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate (cyclic AMP) such as isoproterenol and cholera toxin, as well as the dibutyryl form of cyclic AMP itself, were also unable to generate HSF-like activity. Thus, histamine is unique among the allergic mediators in stimulating elaboration of the suppressive substance. These findings also suggest that the ability of histamine to stimulate HSF may not reside in the conventional pathway linked to cAMP accumulation, but rather to an as yet undefined pathway of cell activation. A model is presented which further implicates histamine as a modulator of cellular immune reactions.