Abstract A08: Concordance in patient and provider priorities and preferences to address behavioral risk factors for cancer health disparities interventions

Purpose: Actively engaging key stakeholders in the development of interventions is necessary to address cancer health disparities. While lay community residents are often included in these efforts, the preferences of patients and providers in primary care settings are often not elicited. We used focus groups and key informant interviews to identify priorities and preferences for lifestyle modification and health behavior change interventions among primary care patients and providers. Methods: Patients (n=35) and providers (n=18) from 3 rural and 5 urban primary care practices that were part of a practice-based research network were recruited to participate in a 60-90 minute focus group or 20-30 minute key informant interview, respectively. Focus groups and key informant interviews were facilitated using a semi-structured discussion guide that asked patients and providers to identify barriers and facilitators to lifestyle modification and health behavior change among patients and implementation of interventions in the practice, the interventions that are preferred by patients, and interventions that can be implemented in the practice. Data were analyzed using NVivo 10 to identify emergent themes. Results: There was concordance between patients and providers in terms of wanting interventions that address diet and physical activity to manage chronic conditions. Patients and providers also identified similar barriers to implementing interventions to address these behaviors: lack of patient motivation and knowledge and limited capacity and knowledge among providers to deliver intensive interventions. Both patients and providers indicated that tailored interventions are most likely to be effective, but resource constraints in the practice were potential barriers to implementation of these types of programs. Despite concordance in preferences for diet and physical activity interventions between patients and providers, there was disagreement about how the effects of these interventions should be monitored. Patients wanted to be held accountable to providers, but providers wanted patients to be accountable to themselves. Conclusions: Our findings emphasize the importance of actively engaging patient and provider stakeholders in efforts to develop interventions that address behavioral risk factors for cancer health disparities. While there is concordance between patients and providers in terms of the behavioral focus of interventions and barriers and facilitators to implementation, there may be discordance in terms of how the effects of interventions are monitored. Efforts to disseminate and implement evidence-based interventions into primary care should consider the preferences of both patients and providers. Citation Format: LaShanta J. Rice, Melanie Jefferson, Cathy L. Melvin, Chanita Hughes Halbert. Concordance in patient and provider priorities and preferences to address behavioral risk factors for cancer health disparities interventions. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Eighth AACR Conference on The Science of Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; Nov 13-16, 2015; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016;25(3 Suppl):Abstract nr A08.