P-006 evaluation of baseline ct aspects and admission neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in perfusion-guided selected ica/mca stroke patients for endovascular reperfusion therapy

Introduction The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as an inexpensive and easily available inflammatory marker, has become a useful index in various conditions such as cardiovascular diseases, neoplastic diseases, diabetes, and recently acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We studied the association between the baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomographic Score (ASPECTS) with admission NLR in AIS patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who underwent perfusion imaging to be selected for IA reperfusion therapy based on perfusion imaging profile. Methods This is an IRB approved ongoing retrospective study. Consecutive AIS patients with CTA/MRA verified ICA/MCA occlusion presenting in acute setting ( 7 (favorable) and ≤7 (unfavorable) groups. Accordingly, NLR was sub-classified into high (>5), and low (≤5) groups. Patient demographics, baseline NIHSS score, medical risk factors, and final clinical outcome (90-day mRS scores) were obtained subsequently. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate interobserver agreement. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, and student t tests were used for univariate analyzes as appropriate. Correlation between ASPECTS and NLR was calculated using Pearson9s correlation coefficient (r). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cut-off NLR for discriminating favorable ASPECTS. P Results Sixty five patients (33 F/32 M, mean age ±SD of 69.77 ± 14.87), with ICA/MCA occlusion were enrolled to the study. Interobserver agreement for ASPECTS was good (ICC=0.82). After dichotomizing the patients based on the ASPECTS and NLR, all groups were comparable in terms of demographics and medical risk factors (P > 0.05). In 52 patients who were selected for IA therapy based on perfusion imaging profile, a significant inverse correlation was observed between ASPECTS and admission NLR (P = 0.01, r=-0.33). In selected patients, unfavorable ASPECTS (≤7) was significantly associated with high NLR (>5) (P = 0.002) and ROC curve analysis revealed that NLR of 5 or less can discriminate favorable (>7) from unfavorable (≤7) ASPECTS with the sensitivity of 80.8% and specificity of 65.4% (P = 0.009, area under the curve= 0.69). In 13 cases who were excluded from receiving IA reperfusion therapy based on their perfusion imaging profile such correlation and association between ASPECTS and NLR were not observed (P = 0.06 and P = 0.93, respectively) and the discriminative power of NLR was poor for prediction of favorable ASPECTS (P = 0.40). Overall, neither ASPECTS nor NLR was predictor of final good functional outcome (P = 0.25, P = 0.96, respectively). Conclusions In our cohort, baseline CT ASPECTS inversely correlated with admission NLR in anterior circulation AIS patients who had favorable perfusion imaging profile for IA reperfusion therapy. Additionally, in this subgroup of patients, NLR of 5 or less discriminated favorable from unfavorable ASPECTS. Disclosures A. Honarmand: None. A. Shaibani: None. F. Syed: None. A. Elmokadem: None. M. Hurley: None. S. Ansari: None.