Evaluation of outcomes following complete primary repair of bladder exstrophy at three individual sites prior to the establishment of a multi-institutional collaborative model

Summary Purpose The Multi-Institutional Bladder Exstrophy Consortium (MIBEC) was established in 2013 to refine technical aspects of the complete primary repair of bladder exstrophy (CPRE), to decrease complications, and to improve outcomes. In order to place outcomes from the consortium into context of historic outcomes, we evaluated continence and dry intervals in children who were repaired prior to the beginning of the consortium at these institutions. We hypothesized that continence (voiding with dryness) is rarely achieved after primary CPRE and surgery following CPRE improves dryness but may hinder voiding per urethra. Materials and methods We reviewed prospectively maintained IRB approved databases of children who underwent CPRE for classic bladder exstrophy (BE) between 5/1993 and 1/2013 at 3 institutions. Exclusion criteria included: lack of continence documentation, and lack of follow up subsequent to January 2014. We recorded age at closure, method of bladder emptying, bladder capacity and surgical history. We used a 3 part dryness scale for both patients who void volitionally and those on CIC. Children were considered dry if they could hold urine for over 3 h. An intermediate group was defined as having a dry interval of 2–3 h, with minimal dampness in between voids. If dry intervals were Results A total of 54 of 73 (38 M) children met inclusion criteria. 35 of 54 (64.8%) children void per urethra, while 18 (33.3%) perform clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) and 1 underwent a vesicostomy due to incomplete emptying and UTI's. 25/35 (71.4%) of those voiding per urethra underwent CPRE only, while the remaining 10 underwent secondary continence procedures. In total, 26 of 54 (48.1%) are dry, that is either continent or not wet for > 3 h, while only 11/54 (20.4%) are truly continent, i.e., voiding per urethra. Only 9/54 (16.7%) are continent after a single surgery (CPRE). 14/54 children who are dry (25.9%) underwent a bladder neck procedure with or without augmentation and empty with CIC. Discussion and conclusion Granular detail about the specifics of emptying, surgical history, and dry intervals is crucial to understand the true outcomes from the repair of BE. Children with BE undergoing CPRE prior to the institution of MIBEC experienced variable results, with only 17% achieving continence while spontaneously voiding per urethra without additional reconstruction. We are now engaged in MIBEC to identify factors that contribute to continence and to attempt to render such findings reproducible. Summary Table 1 . Wet (20) 2-3 h (8) Dry (26) N = 54 Type of voiding Void 17 7 11 35 CIC 1 1 13 15 Void + CIC to empty 1 0 2 3 Vesicostomy 1 0 0 1 Procedures CPRE only 12 4 11 ∗ 27 CPRE + BNI 5 ∗∗ 3 1 ∗ 9 CPRE + BNR 2 0 2 4 CPRE + APV 0 0 1 1 CPRE + BNR + APV 1 ∗ 0 3 4 CPRE + BNR + Augment ± APV 0 1 6 7 CPRE + BNC + Augment + APV 0 0 2 2 CIC: Clean Intermittent Catheterization. BNI: Bladder neck injection. BNR: Bladder neck reconstruction. BNC: Bladder neck closure. APV: Appendicovesicostomy. ∗ 1 voids and CIC to empty completely. ∗∗ 1 went on to vesicostomy.