A tribute to the Xenopus laevis oocyte and egg.

When I was asked to reflect as part of the celebration of the 100-year anniversary of the Journal of Biological Chemistry I recalled a talk by Seymour Cohen at the Federation meetings in Atlantic City about 1960. He began by thanking bacteriophage for providing him with so many wonderful research problems. I decided in the same spirit to pay homage to the Xenopus laevis egg and oocyte, two states of a cell that has played and continues to play a central role in most of the disciplines of modern biology including biochemistry and molecular biology. Many of us owe a debt of gratitude to this cell. The egg is the most important and interesting cell in the repertoire of any organism. In X. laevis this single cell has a diameter of about 1.3 mm. The oocyte is permeable to small molecules, but after it undergoes meiosis and becomes an unfertilized egg it is impermeable to these same molecules. The oocyte is an active site of RNA and protein synthesis but not DNA replication, whereas the unfertilized egg is poised to replicate every 10 min after it is fertilized. During the cleavage period the embryo is transcriptionally silent. An oocyte can be cultured for days, but once ovulated the egg degenerates rapidly if it is not fertilized. The oocyte is the largest single cell in the body yet it has many of the same structures as somatic cells. These compartments are so exaggerated in size that they are accessible to cell biologists for manipulation and visualization. The huge oocyte nucleus is called a germinal vesicle (GV). The premeiotic tetraploid chromosomes are expanded into a “lampbrush” configuration so that they can be studied with a light microscope. The X. laevis egg and its possibilities for experimental manipulation were introduced to modern biology in the late 1950s by John Gurdon (Fig. 1), then a graduate student in the laboratory of Michail Fischberg in the Department of Zoology at Oxford University. Gurdon’s thesis was to reproduce with the South African “clawed toad” X. laevis the famous nuclear transplantation experiments that Briggs and King had perfected with the American leopard frog, Rana pipiens (1). Embryonic nuclei were injected into eggs whose own nuclei had been removed or destroyed. These early cloning experiments addressed the question of whether a differentiated and specialized somatic cell nucleus was still capable of expressing its full genetic repertoire. Briggs and King found that nuclei from R. pipiens embryos older than gastrula never promoted normal development, suggesting that the genetic material might change in cells as they specialize during embryonic development. This result was challenged by John Gurdon’s demonstration that nuclei from X. laevis embryos are more permissive. Even a small fraction of nuclei derived from differentiated intestinal epithelial cells supported normal development (2). This crucial scientific question of whether irreversible changes occur in the genome of highly specialized cells was addressed more precisely by experimental manipulation than by biochemistry or genetics. The concepts behind these experiments have influenced the stem cell field. The topic of whether the genome is altered in specialized somatic cells was revisited just this year by the same strategy of nuclear transplantation. Postmitotic nuclei from olfactory neurons support the development of normal fertile mice when transplanted into enucleated mouse eggs (3). THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 279, No. 44, Issue of October 29, pp. 45291–45299, 2004 © 2004 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. Printed in U.S.A.