Seemingly paradoxical jumping in cataleptic haloperidol-treated rats is triggered by postural instability.

Paradoxically, animals exhibiting haloperidol-induced cataleptic immobility can be induced to leap vigorously, by pushing them forward from behind. It is shown, here that such jumping can also be produced by placing them on a board and tilting it tail-end upward until about 50 degrees above horizontal. In both situations, jumps only occurred when the animal's hindlegs began to slip forward, as they lost their postural stability. As alternatives to jumping from the slope, rats turned to face upwards (negative geotaxis), or adopted a spread-eagled posture during head-first downward sliding, with the body and head flattened against the substrate. All 3 responses to the sloping board were present in some undrugged rats. Such rats, and those given low doses of haloperidol (0.5., 1.0 mg/kg), were more likely to turn upwards than to jump or slide. At high doses (7.5, 10.0 mg/kg), they were more likely to slide downward than to turn or jump. Jumping was most likely to occur at an intermediate dose (5 mg/kg), approximately 60 min after injection. We suggest that in the absence of haloperidol, and at low doses, locomotion is dominant over reflexes defending static equilibrium, and hence rats are more likely to turn upwards (which involves stepping). In contrast, at higher doses, locomotion is more fully suppressed, reducing the likelihood of turning. At very high doses of haloperidol and later in the action of the drug, muscle tonus appears to be weakened, reducing the likelihood of jumping. This possibility was supported by the finding that combined injection of the optimal dose of haloperidol and 2 mg/kg diazepam reduced the ability to cling vertically (suggesting weakness of muscle tone). In such rats, jumping from the sloping board was decreased, and active downward sliding was increased. Thus, different factors influence the occurrence of jumping at different doses of haloperidol. However, these are all active defensive responses to postural instability, and hence are similar to the other reflexes used by haloperidol-treated rats to defend against displacement from static stable equilibrium, such as standing immobile, bracing, clinging, and righting. Jumping in response to loss of stability on the sloping board also occasionally occurred in undrugged rats. Unlike jumps by haloperidol-treated rats, those by undrugged animals only occurred when they could be directed to a safe landing place. Thus, if the board faced the edge of the table, so that the jump would carry the animal into space over the edge, undrugged rats either did not jump or jumped off the side of the board onto the table. In contrast, haloperidol-treated rats jumped head-long into space of the table. Visual occlusion, which prevented the rat from seeing where he was going to land, blocked jumping in undrugged rats, but not in haloperidol-treated rats. Therefore, although both in undrugged and haloperidol-treated rats jumping is an adaptive response to loss of stability, the controls over the jump in drugged animals appear simplified: jumping is decoupled from the location of a safe place towards which to jump.