Regular or "super-aspirins"? A review of thienopyridines or aspirin to prevent stroke.

PURPOSE: To review the evidence for the effectiveness and safety of the thienopyridines (ticlopidine and clopidogrel) compared with aspirin for the prevention of vascular events among patients at high risk of vascular disease. BACKGROUND: Atherosclerosis and resultant cardiovascular disease are important causes of morbidity and mortality in older people. In particular, atherosclerosis of the cerebral arteries can lead to transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) and stroke. Stroke ranks as the third-leading cause of death in the United States and in 1997 was responsible for over 150,000 fatalities.1 In addition to the mortality associated with this disease, stroke is also a leading source of long-term disability in survivors. Nearly 4.5 million stroke survivors are alive today,1 highlighting the fact that primary, but also secondary, prevention are extremely important for minimizing the complications of this illness. DATA SOURCES: Specialized trial registers of the Cochrane Stroke Group and the Antithrombotic Trialist's Collaboration, MEDLINE, and Embase were searched. Additional unpublished information and data were sought from Sanofi, the pharmaceutical company that developed and manufactures ticlopidine and clopidogrel, as well as the principal investigators of the Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events (CAPRIE) trial,7 the largest of the trials identified. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: All unconfounded randomized trials comparing either ticlopidine or clopidogrel with aspirin among patients at high risk of vascular disease (those with symptoms of ischemia of the cerebral, coronary, or peripheral circulations) who were followed for at least 1 month for the recurrence of vascular events were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted from four completed randomized trials completed in the past 20 years, which included 22,656 patients.7–10 Two authors independently extracted the data from these trials for the following information: the types of patients enrolled; the entry and exclusion criteria; the randomization method; the number of patients originally allocated to the treatment and control groups; the method and duration of follow-up; the number of patients in each group lost to follow-up; information on compliance with the treatment allocated; the definitions of outcome events; the number of outcome events in each treatment group; and any method used for blinding patients, treating clinicians, and outcome assessors to treatment allocation. MAIN RESULTS: Four completed trials involving a total of 22,656 patients were identified. Aspirin was compared with ticlopidine in three trials (3,471 patients)8–10 and with clopidogrel in one trial (19,185 patients).7 A recent TIA or ischemic stroke was the qualifying event in 9,840 patients, a recent myocardial infarction in 6,302 patients, and symptomatic peripheral arterial disease in 6,514 patients. The average age of the patients was approximately 63, with approximately two-thirds of the patients being male and white. The duration of follow-up ranged from 12 to 40 months. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review demonstrates that, compared with aspirin, thienopyridines are only modestly more effective in preventing serious vascular events in high-risk patients. For patients who are intolerant of, or allergic to aspirin, the available safety and efficacy data suggest that clopidogrel is an appropriate, but more-expensive, alternative antiplatelet drug. It appears safer than ticlopidine and as safe as aspirin but it should not replace aspirin as the first-choice antiplatelet agent for all patients. Further studies are necessary to determine which, if any, particular types of patients would benefit most and least from clopidogrel instead of aspirin.