Incorporating genomics and bioinformatics across the life sciences curriculum.

Community Page Incorporating Genomics and Bioinformatics across the Life Sciences Curriculum Jayna L. Ditty 1 , Christopher A. Kvaal 2 , Brad Goodner 3 , Sharyn K. Freyermuth 4 , Cheryl Bailey 5 , Robert A. Britton 6 , Stuart G. Gordon 7 , Sabine Heinhorst 8 , Kelynne Reed 9 , Zhaohui Xu 10 , Erin R. Sanders-Lorenz 11 , Seth Axen 12 , Edwin Kim 12 , Mitrick Johns 13 , Kathleen Scott 14 , Cheryl A. Kerfeld 12,15 * 1 Department of Biology, University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America, 2 Department of Biological Sciences, St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, Minnesota, United States of America, 3 Department of Biology, Hiram College, Hiram, Ohio, United States of America, 4 Biochemistry Department, University of Missouri- Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America, 5 Department of Biochemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America, 6 Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America, 7 Department of Biology, Presbyterian College, Clinton, South Carolina, United States of America, 8 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States of America, 9 Biology Department, Austin College, Sherman, Texas, United States of America, 10 Department of Biological Sciences, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio, United States of America, 11 Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics, University of California – Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America, 12 Department of Energy-Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, United States of America, 13 Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, United States of America, 14 Department of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America, 15 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California Berkley, Berkeley, California, United States of America Introduction Undergraduate life sciences education needs an overhaul, as clearly described in the National Research Council of the National Academies’ publication BIO 2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists. Among BIO 2010’s top recommendations is the need to involve students in working with real data and tools that reflect the nature of life sciences research in the 21st century [1]. Education research studies support the importance of utilizing primary literature, designing and implementing experiments, and analyzing results in the context of a bona fide scientific question [1–12] in cultivating the analytical skills necessary to become a scientist. Incorporating these basic scientific methodologies in under- graduate education leads to increased undergraduate and post-graduate reten- tion in the sciences [13–16]. Toward this end, many undergraduate teaching orga- nizations offer training and suggestions for faculty to update and improve their teaching approaches to help students learn as scientists, through design and discovery (e.g., Council of Undergraduate Research [www.cur.org] and Project Kaleidoscope [ www.pkal.org]). With the advent of genome sequencing and bioinformatics, many scientists now formulate biological questions and inter- pret research results in the context of genomic information. Just as the use of bioinformatic tools and databases changed the way scientists investigate problems, it must change how scientists teach to create new opportunities for students to gain experiences reflecting the influence of genomics, proteomics, and bioinformatics on modern life sciences research [17–41]. Educators have responded by incorpo- rating bioinformatics into diverse life science curricula [42–44]. While these published exercises in, and guidelines for, bioinformatics curricula are helpful and inspirational, faculty new to the area of bioinformatics inevitably need training in the theoretical underpinnings of the algo- rithms [45]. Moreover, effectively inte- grating bioinformatics into courses or independent research projects requires infrastructure for organizing and assessing student work. Here, we present a new platform for faculty to keep current with the rapidly changing field of bioinfor- matics, the Integrated Microbial Genomes Annotation Collaboration Toolkit (IMG- ACT) (Figure 1). It was developed by instructors from both research-intensive and predominately undergraduate institu- tions in collaboration with the Department of Energy-Joint Genome Institute (DOE- JGI) as a means to innovate and update undergraduate education and faculty de- velopment. The IMG-ACT program pro- vides a cadre of tools, including access to a clearinghouse of genome sequences, bioin- formatics databases, data storage, instruc- tor course management, and student notebooks for organizing the results of their bioinformatic investigations. In the process, IMG-ACT makes it feasible to provide undergraduate research opportu- nities to a greater number and diversity of students, in contrast to the traditional mentor-to-student apprenticeship model for undergraduate research, which can be too expensive and time-consuming to provide for every undergraduate. The IMG-ACT serves as the hub for the network of faculty and students that use the system for microbial genome analysis. Open access of the IMG-ACT infrastructure to participating schools en- sures that all types of higher education institutions can utilize it. With the infra- structure in place, faculty can focus their efforts on the pedagogy of bioinformatics, involvement of students in research, and use of this tool for their own research agenda. What the original faculty mem- bers of the IMG-ACT development team present here is an overview of how the IMG-ACT program has affected our Citation: Ditty JL, Kvaal CA, Goodner B, Freyermuth SK, Bailey C, et al. (2010) Incorporating Genomics and Bioinformatics across the Life Sciences Curriculum. PLoS Biol 8(8): e1000448. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000448 Published August 10, 2010 Copyright: s 2010 Ditty et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Funding: No specific funding was received for this work. The Community Page is a forum for organizations and societies to highlight their efforts to enhance the dissemination and value of scientific knowledge. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Abbreviations: IMG-ACT; Integrated Microbial Genomes Annotation Collaboration Toolkit * E-mail: ckerfeld@lbl.gov PLoS Biology | www.plosbiology.org August 2010 | Volume 8 | Issue 8 | e1000448