Strong, Specific Binding of Six Different DNA Sequences by a Single Conformation-Switching DNA Macrocycle†

Certain nucleic-acid-binding proteins can recognize varied substrate structures by making use of multiple binding domains or by undergoing conformational changes in a specific binding domain. For example, the Xenopus zinc-finger protein TFIIIA recognizes a specific sequence in duplex DNA and a significantly different sequence in ribosomal RNA;[1–5] this switching of binding site is implicated in feedback-type control of gene expression. We have recently begun to examine various approaches for the design of multifunctional DNA-recognizing molecules which can mimic this kind of multisite-binding behavior.[6] The ability to control binding in this way not only serves to mimic a complex biological function, but also may have some practical applications as well. For example, recent studies in the use of oligonucleotides as sequence-specific inhibitors of gene expression have shown that the combination of agents targeted to multiple sites can be more effective in vitro than single-site binding alone.[7–9] We recently described the design and synthesis of a cyclic oligodeoxynucleotide molecule which can bind strongly to two separate DNA sequences by switching conformation.[6] In that earlier prototypical structure, a cyclic DNA molecule which contained separate pairs of nine-base binding domains (36 nucleotides altogether) was used to recognize two nine-base sequences by interchanging binding and bridging domains (totalling 18 nucleotides of sequence recognition by the 36 nucleotides in the cyclic compound). In order to explore the limits of this kind of multifunctional binding, we now report the synthesis and properties of a new cyclic DNA which is designed to recognize six different sequences by undergoing six conformational changes. At the same time, careful design allows the elimination of duplicated nucleotides, leading to very high economy of function: the molecule selectively recognizes 48 nucleotides of sequence although the molecule itself contains only 35 nucleotides. Several novel design principles are discussed. The design of the DNA macrocycle 1 involves the combination of several different principles (Fig. 1). First, binding would occur by triplex formation between opposing pyrimidine domains (the Watson–Crick and Hoogsteen domains) in the circle and a complementary sequence of purines in the target molecule. This would result in stronger binding and higher sequence selectivity than is possible for simple Watson–Crick binding.[10, 11] Second, because the two pyrimidine binding domain sequences in such a circle are related by a pseudo-mirror-plane of symmetry, a pair of binding domains might bind the forward (5′ → 3′ direction) or the reverse (3′ → 5′ direction) of a given sequence by switching the roles of the Watson–Crick and Hoogsteen domains. Third, by contiguous alternating placement of three binding domain pairs, this might allow recognition of six different sequences (three in one orientation and three in the reverse). Recognition of a sequence with a given binding domain pair would then make use of the other domains as bridging loops in the complex.[6] Finally, one might achieve this multiple recognition with fewer nucleotides by eliminating those whose function is duplicated in a neighboring domain, thus overlapping the boundaries of the domains. With this approach, many of the individual nucleotides have more than one function. Fig. 1 Top: The sequence of circular oligodeoxynucleotide 1 (in center) and the adducts of 1 with complementary sequences 2–7. Bottom: Strategies for construction of 1. The three pairs of domains necessary for recognition by triplex formation were placed ... Specifically, we designed and synthesized the macrocycle 1 with the ability to recognize the six eight-base sequences 2–7 (Fig. 1). The total sequence recognition thus encompasses 48 bases of DNA. If the pyrimidine binding domains of the circle were kept separate and incorporated contiguously into a circle, this would require a circle 48 nucleotides in size. By overlapping the ends of the required domains (Fig. 1 bottom), we eliminate the need for 13 of the nucleotides, and so the circle 1 contains only 35 nucleotides. The structure of 1 should, in principle, retain the high sequence selectivity previously seen for this kind of circular ligand.[10] To test this selectivity, we also synthesized two sequences, 8 and 9 (sequences shown in Fig. 2), which are the same as two of the recognition sequences but with two nucleotides interchanged. Fig. 2 Top: Melting temperatures Tm [°C] for complexes of 1 with complementary sequences 2–7 and mismatched sequences 8 and 9. Bottom: The relative affinity of 1 for a triple helical complement (4) as compared to other Watson–Crick complements ... Binding studies of 1 with these eight purine sequences were carried out by optical monitoring of thermal denaturation of the 1:1 mixtures at pH 7.0 (100 mm NaCl, 10 mm MgCl2). Melting curves reveal sharp, apparently two-state transitions at 260 nm for the complexes of 1 with 2–7. As expected for such triple helical complexes,[11] the melting temperatures are considerably higher than those for simple Watson–Crick complements containing the same base pairs (see below). The melting transitions of 1 with 2–7 are all within the range 33–37 °C (Fig. 2 top); the hyperchromicities are 18–25%. Also consistent with this mode of binding is the finding that the stability of all six complexes are pH-dependent (data not shown), as expected for triplexes involving C · G · C triads and not duplexes.[12] By contrast, mismatched sequences 8 and 9 are bound much more weakly than 1, with Tm values of 18.8 and 19.6 °C, respectively, and are essentially fully dissociated at room temperature. Curve-fitting algorithms[13] allow estimates of free energy for the complexes of 1 with 2–9. Under these conditions, the complexes 1 · 2–1 · 7 are bound with free energies (−ΔG25o) of 10.3–12.2 kcal mol−1. By comparison, the complexes of the two mismatched purine sequences (8, 9) are bound much weaker to 1, with free energies of 6.5 and 6.6 kcal mol−1. Thus, 1 is selective for the complementary sequences over these two mismatched sequences by three to four orders of magnitude in association constant. A different issue of complementarity and selectivity arises from the structure of 1. While it is designed to recognize sequences 2–7 by triplex formation, it is also complementary in Watson–Crick fashion to 29 additional eight-nucleotide sequences. To test whether the circle 1 binds selectively to the six intended sequences (2–7) relative to the 29 other sequences, we synthesized three purine octamers, 10–12, which are fully complementary to the circle only in Watson–Crick fashion. The complementary sites for the sequences occur adjacent to the binding domain for the triplex-bound oligomer 4, and is frameshifted by one, two, or three nucleotides, respectively (Fig. 2 bottom). Results of these additional binding studies show that while the circle 1 is indeed complementary to the Watson–Crick complements 10–12, it shows considerable selectivity instead for the intended triplex complements 2–7. Thus, 10–12 are bound with Tm values of 24.9–25.4 °C and hypochromicity values of 0.10–0.16, while the triplex complements 2–7 are bound with Tm values of 33.1 – 37.1 °C and hypochromicity values of 0.18–0.25. The free energy of formation for these types of complex differs by 2.1 –4.3 kcal mol−1. The association constant for 1 · 2–1 · 7 is 34- to 1400-fold larger than that for 1 · 10–1 · 12. The sequences which are only complementary in Watson–Crick fashion may thus be viewed as being mismatched sequences, since they are not able to form the full number of stabilizing Hoogsteen bonds that the intended six sequences can. The lower hypochromicitiy values with 1 · 10–1 · 12 are consistent with the Hoogsteen strand not being involved in these complexes, although we cannot rule out partial Hoogsteen-type interaction. The selectivity shown by 1 against Watson–Crick binding alone is, in fact, similar in magnitude to the amount of discrimination which a linear oligodeoxynucleotide shows against single-base mismatches.[10] It is clear, therefore, that compound 1 is readily able to distinguish between its six target sequenes and other complementary and partially complementary DNA sequences. In summary, the results indicate that reasonably complex multifunctional behavior can be successfully designed into synthetic DNA-recognizing molecules. The design of the oligonucleotide macrocycle 1 illustrates ways to control binding properties in DNA molecules by varying more than just the simple primary sequence of nucleotide bases. In this case, the circularity, the use of opposite domains for binding, and the pseudo-symmetry of the domains all allow for greater control of secondary and tertiary interactions in the final complexes than is commonly used in Watson–Crick binding. It is possible that this multisite binding might be applied to practical problems of nucleic acid recognition; for example, inhibition of gene expression by targeting more than one site in a gene, or more than one gene in an organism. Further study will be necessary to investigate these possibilities.