Demasculinization of X chromosomes in the Drosophila genus

This issue includes a landmark collection of papers on the stalwart of the genetics lab, the Drosophila fruit fly. The centrepiece is the publication by the Drosophila 12 Genomes Consortium of the genomic sequence for ten Drosophila species. The paper compares the newly sequenced genomes (sechellia, simulans, yakuba, erecta, ananassae, persimilis, willistoni, mojavensis, virilis and grimshawi species), with the two previously known sequences for D. melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura. The resulting database of genetic variation will be invaluable for the study of the forces of evolutionary change. A second major collaboration has mined the dozen Drosophila genome sequences for conserved elements, and reports the relationship between conservation and function for many specific sequence motifs. A detailed regulatory network emerges, identifying protein-coding genes and exons, RNA genes, microRNAs and their targets. These papers are discussed in News and Views. Two further research papers use the new genomic data to study gene expression, first for genes with male-biased expression and those unique to each species and second, to track the evolution of gene dosage compensation on Drosophila sex chromosomes. Four new reviews focus on how the latest work on Drosophila is taking this genetically pliant lab model into exciting new fields. Pierre Leopold and Norbert Perrimon review advances in the study of endocrinology and homeostasis that are establishing Drosophila as a model for mammalian physiology. Drosophila has proved a powerful system in which to study the pathways controlling cell shape in growing tissue, as reported by Thomas Lecuit and Loic Le Goff. Leslie Vosshall reviews the remarkable work linking neural circuits and behaviour and John Lis reviews work on Drosophila that has rewritten the textbook view of gene transcription. The cover shows anaesthetized individuals of all twelve Drosophila species. The evolution of dosage compensation on Drosophila sex chromosomes is examined by using microarrays to determine relative gene expression of sex-linked genes in a number of fly species. How this expression changes over time is discussed, particularly in species with a neo-X chromosome, to determine why genes might have male-biased expression. X chromosomes evolve differently from autosomes, but general governing principles have not emerged1. For example, genes with male-biased expression are under-represented on the X chromosome of D. melanogaster2, but are randomly distributed in the genome of Anopheles gambiae3. In direct global profiling experiments using species-specific microarrays, we find a nearly identical paucity of genes with male-biased expression on D. melanogaster, D. simulans, D. yakuba, D. ananassae, D. virilis and D. mojavensis X chromosomes. We observe the same under-representation on the neo-X of D. pseudoobscura. It has been suggested that precocious meiotic silencing of the X chromosome accounts for reduced X chromosome male-biased expression in nematodes4, mammals5 and Drosophila6. We show that X chromosome genes with male-biased expression are under-represented in somatic cells and in mitotic male germ cells. These data are incompatible with simple X chromosome inactivation models. Using expression profiling and comparative sequence analysis, we show that selective gene extinction on the X chromosome, creation of new genes on autosomes and changed genomic location of existing genes contribute to the unusual X chromosome gene content.