Melt crystallized polyamide 6.6 and its copolymers, Part I. Melting point – Lamellar thickness relations in the homopolymer

Abstract The effect of isothermal crystallization temperature and time on the lamellar thickness and the melting behavior of polyamide 66 has been studied. Measurements were made of the melting temperature, crystallinity, and the long period. When calculated in the conventional direct manner, for samples crystallized isothermally, the calculated lamellar thickness was found to vary only from 2.4 to 3.2 nm over the entire range of conditions considered. When viewed in a non-critical fashion the polymer appears to conform to normal behavior including typical Tc vs. Tm behavior on a Hoffman–Weeks plot and apparent linearity in a Gibbs–Thompson plot. SAXS data indicates that there are only small changes in the lamellar thickness occurring over the entire crystallization range despite major changes in the melting point. Accordingly the Gibbs–Thompson plot shows major amounts of scatter, which are well beyond the experimental errors involved. The changes in melting temperature appear to be a result of changes in the structure of the fold surface on the basis of the conventional lamellar thickness analysis. In particular they appear to be due to changes in the character of the surface related to the hydrogen bonding and to the relative amounts of acid and amine segments present in the folds. When a more thorough analysis of the SAXS data are conducted, using a one dimensional correlation function approach, calculation of the crystal core thicknesses and “interfacial layer” thicknesses, a different picture emerges. In this case, the total lamellar thickness remains approximately constant at 2 repeat units in length with isothermal crystallization temperature, however, the core thickness increases with increasing crystallization temperature and time, from 1.5 to 2 repeat units in length, whereas the “interfacial layer” thickness is substantial at lower temperatures and times. When the core thickness is used in a Gibbs–Thompson plot the equilibrium melting temperature is found to be 303.7 °C (cf. 301 °C from solution grown crystals). However, the fold surface free energy is found to be 23.7 erg/cm2 much lower than the value of 74.6 erg/cm2 characteristic of solution grown crystals. Such a large discrepancy is believed to be a result of the highly polar solvents used in solution based studies generating the widely accepted “acid folds”. The difference may be because of a switch to folds containing six methylene groups from the diamine mer in the bulk case. Since the polymer is known to crystallize in the hexagonal state and reorganize during cooling to the regularly reported structure it is possible that the “interfacial thickness” is indeed a disordered surface layer within the crystalline lamella that originates from the precursor hexagonal phase during its formation, rather than the conventional disordered surface interpretation, applicable to polymers such as polyethylene. It is also possible that it is reflective of disorder induced in surface layers within the crystal due to the conformational changes occurring during this crystal–crystal transition. For these reasons, we prefer to refer to the “interfacial layer” obtained from SAXS calculations as an innerlayer.