Effect of Integrating Soil Solarization and Organic Mulching on the Soil Surface Insect Community

Mulching by spreading organic matter around plants is an effective method to manage some pest insects as well as weeds (Brown & Tworkoski 2004; Johnson et al. 2004). Mulches provide shel ter for predatory insects (Pullaro et al. 2006). Soil solarization, a hydrothermal method of managing nematodes, diseases, insects, and weeds, is ac complished by passive heating of moist soil cov ered with transparent plastic sheeting (McGov ern & McSorley 1997). Because of the lethal ef fects from high soil temperature, solarization must be conducted before crops are planted. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the integrated effects of solarization and organic mulch on the soil surface insect community, in cluding non-target and beneficial insects. Field experiments were conducted in fall 2008 at the University of Florida Plant Science Re search and Education Unit (lat. 29?24'N, long. 8209W), near Citra, FL. The soil was Arredondo sand (95% sand, 2% silt, 3% clay) with 1.5% or ganic matter. The field was rototilled in Jul, and beds were formed (20 cm high, 76 cm wide, with 1.8 m between bed centers). Individual plots were single beds, 9.14 m in length. Average soil mois ture measured gravimetrically before bed forma tion was 8.7%. Four treatments were arranged in a random ized complete block design with 5 replications. The treatments compared were: solarization (S) = plastic pre-plant, nothing post-plant; mulch (M) = mulch pre-plant, mulch post-plant; mulch + solar (MS) = plastic pre-plant, mulch post-plant; and control (C) = nothing pre-plant, mulch post-plant. For the mulch treatment, a pre-plant mulch of sunn hemp (Crotalaria juncea L.), 3 cm thick (8.16 kg total weight/plot), was applied over the bed surface on Aug 13. In the solarization treat ment, beds were covered with Polydak? (1.3-mil thick, UVstabilized, transparent film, Ginegar Plastics Products, Ginegar, Israel) plastic film for 6 weeks beginning on Aug 12 as described by Gill et al. (2009). After 6 weeks, plastic was removed, and all beds were planted with Totomac Pink' snapdragons (Antirrhinum majus L.). Mulch was again applied on Oct 2, as a main mulch applica tion, to M, C, and MS treatments. Note that is not possible to have mulch and solarization plastic present on a plot at the same time. Soil surface insects were sampled with plastic sandwich containers (14 cm 14 cm 4 cm deep) used as pitfall traps as described by Borror et al. (1989). Each pitfall trap was placed in the center of the plot and buried so that the upper edge was flush with the soil surface. Traps were filled three-quarters full with tap water, and 3 to 4 drops of dish detergent (Ultra Joy?, Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH) added to break surface tension, and ensure that the insects remain in the trap. Traps were set out in the morning and col lected before noon the next day (recorded as the sampling date). Traps were placed in cold storage (10QC), contents transferred and stored in 70% ethanol, and insects were identified to order and family and counted. Data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Statistical Analysis System (version 9.1; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Treatment means were separated based on the least significant difference (LSD) range test, at <l 0.05. Preplant mulching or solarization was useful in reducing weeds in the plots. The main weeds were nutsedges (Cyperus spp.), grasses, Florida pusley (Richardia scabra L.), purslane (Portulaca oler?cea L.), and hairy indigo (Indigofera hirsuta L.). The percentage of the plot surface area occu pied by weeds averaged 3 to 5% in MS, ca 90% in C, 20 to 25% in S, and 35 to 40% in M plots, re spectively. On most sampling dates, Collembola popula tions were higher in the M treatment than in the S treatment (Table 1). Collembola are associated with decomposing organic matter (Colemen & Crossley 1996), which was provided by sunn hemp in the M treatment. Collembola were not as abundant in S plots, possibly because mulch was absent. In addition, the solarization process itself may have reduced populations that were present in soil. Many groups of arthropods, including spiders, ants, grasshoppers, crickets, elaterids, and sta phylinids were unaffected by the treatments (data not shown), but interesting trends were ob served in some others. Cicadellids were more abundant (P <; 0.10) in C plots (12.0 ? 2.59/ trap) than in MS plots (5.8 ? 2.42/trap) on Nov 9. On Oct 28, highest numbers ( 0.10) of carabids (0.8 ? 0.37/ trap) and flea beetles (0.4 ? 0.24/trap) were observed in S plots. Highest numbers (P ss 0.10) of dolichopodids (8.0 ? 2.43/trap) were ob served in S plots on Dec 8. Solarized plots were free of mulch and had relatively low weed levels, both of which might influence insect movement. Environmental heterogeneity is known to inter fere with movement and host finding of flea bee tles and other insects (Root 1973; Smith & McSor ley 2000).