The marC gene of Escherichia coli is not involved in multiple antibiotic resistance.

The marC gene of Escherichia coli is divergently transcribed from the marRAB operon involved in resistance to multiple antibiotics (5, 8), oxidative stress agents (2), and organic solvents (3, 16). Previous data from our laboratory had suggested a role for marC in intrinsic multiple antibiotic resistance (4, 9, 16), and the gene has been so annotated in most databases. Because that earlier work had suggested that marC was regulated by the repressor MarR and induced by tetracycline, we sought the transcriptional start site for marC to see if the marC promoter might overlap the MarR binding sites within the marRAB promoter (5′ rapid amplification of cDNA end [RACE] system of Gibco/BRL Life Technologies, cells grown with 2 μg/ml tetracycline to increase the amount of mRNA). Transcription of marC started 30 nucleotides upstream from the putative ATG initiation codon of MarC (bp 1266 of Cohen et al. [4]). Therefore, the marC promoter does not contain the MarR binding sites. Moreover, Northern blot analysis of AG100 and its isogenic marR mutant AG112 (in which MarR is inactive [8, 12]) showed no differences in levels of marC mRNA between the two strains (data not shown), nor was expression of marC induced by salicylate, which inactivates the repressor MarR (1) (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). We conclude that marC is not regulated by MarR. Since chloramphenicol does not bind to MarR (1), the apparent up-regulation by tetracycline and chloramphenicol (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) (4) likely reflects stabilization of mRNA rather than true induction (11, 13, 14). FIG. 1. Northern blot analysis of marC from E. coli. RNA was isolated from mid-exponential-phase cells grown in LB broth at 30°C and treated for 1 h with the specified compounds. Separate cultures of E. coli AG100 following exposure to 5 mM salicylate ... We replaced the marC locus in E. coli AG100 with a kanamycin cassette as described previously (10) and looked for any increase in susceptibilities to antimicrobials. MICs were determined on LB agar by use of Etest strips (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) with about three dozen different agents, including beta lactams, tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins, imipenem, macrolides, aminoglycosides, chloramphenicol, fusidic acid, trimethoprim, and rifampin. Gradient plates (6) were used for oxidative stress agents (plumbagin, paraquat, phenylmethylsulfonate, dinitrophenol, and menadione) and for ethidium bromide. No differences in susceptibilities were seen for the marC::kan deletion mutant relative to the wild type. We then replaced the genes for the E. coli MarC paralogs YchE and YhgN in the marC::kan strain by use of spectinomycin and gentamicin cassettes, respectively, to create a triple knockout mutant, but again no differences in susceptibilities were seen. We also used three plasmid constructs designed to overexpress marC via the araBAD, T7, or native marC promoter. Plasmid pHA-1::marC (obtained from D. Daley) specifies membrane-bound MarC-PhoA regulated by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium pBAD/AraC (7). We constructed pETmarC11 (T7 promoter/lac operator with lac repressor; specifying MarC-6H) and pACmarC1 (marC promoter starting 58 bp upstream of the transcriptional start site; specifying native MarC) by cloning PCR-amplified DNA into vectors pET21b (Novagen) and pACYC184, respectively. None of these three plasmids led to a change in susceptibility of cells to a variety of antibiotics and oxidative stress agents. We suggest that MarC no longer be classified as a multiple antibiotic resistance protein. However, we do not advise a name change until a function is found.