Performance of Viabahn balloon-expandable stent compared with self-expandable covered stents for branched endovascular aortic repair.

Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to compare the performance between the Viabahn balloon-expandable stent (VBX; Viabahn [W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz]) and a covered self-expandable stent (SES; Fluency [Bard Peripheral Vascular, Tempe, Ariz]) used as bridging stents for directional branches during fenestrated or branched endovascular aneurysm repair of complex aortic aneurysms. Methods Patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (type I-IV) or pararenal aortic aneurysms either at high risk for open repair or unsuitable for endovascular repair with commercially available devices were prospectively enrolled in a physician-sponsored investigational device exemption trial. Descriptive statistics of the cohort included demographics, risk factors, and anatomic and device characteristics. Individual branches were grouped as either VBX or SES and had data analyzed for primary patency, branch-related type I or type III endoleaks, branch instability, branch-related secondary intervention, and branch-related aortic rupture or death. Categorical variables were expressed as total and percentage, and continuous variables were expressed as median (interquartile range). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate long-term results. Groups were compared with the log-rank test. P value Results During the period from July 2012 through June 2019, there were 263 patients treated for complex aortic aneurysm (thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm) with fenestrated or branched endografts. The devices used were either custom-manufactured devices or off-the-shelf p-Branch or t-Branch (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) devices. The median age was 71 years (interquartile range, 66-79 years); 70% were male, and 81% were white. The most common cardiac risk factors were smoking (92%), hypertension (91%), hyperlipidemia (78%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (52%). The total number of vessels incorporated into the repair was 977, with branches representing 18.4% (179 branches). Among these 179 branches, the celiac artery, superior mesenteric artery, right renal artery, and left renal artery received 54 (30%), 56 (31%), 38 (21%), and 31 (18%) branches, respectively. VBX and SES groups represented 96 (54%) and 81 (46%) of the branches implanted. The celiac artery, superior mesenteric artery, right renal artery, and left renal artery received VBX as a bridging stent in 40%, 46.7%, 33.8%, and 32.2% respectively. The overall cohort survival rate was 78.5% at 24 months. There was no branch-related rupture or mortality. Primary patency at 24 months (VBX, 98.1%; SES, 98.6%; log-rank, P = .95), freedom from endoleak (VBX, 95.6%; SES, 98.6%; log-rank, P = .66), freedom from secondary intervention (VBX, 94.7%; SES, 98.1%; log-rank, P = .33), and freedom from branch instability (VBX, 95.6%; SES, 97.2%; log-rank, P = .77) were similar between groups. Conclusions This initial experience with VBX stents demonstrated excellent primary patency and similarly low rates of branch-related complications and endoleaks, with no branch-related aortic rupture or death. Our results demonstrate that in a high-volume, experienced aortic center, the VBX stent is a safe and effective bridging stent option during branched endovascular aortic repair. Multicenter studies with a larger cohort and longer follow-up are necessary to validate these findings.