Irrigation management methods for reducing water use of cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.) and lima bean ( Phaseolus lunatus L.) while maintaining seed yield at maximum levels

In a previous study conducted at the University of California at Riverside, it was shown that water use of cowpea could be reduced while maintaining seed yields by withholding irrigation during the vegetative stage in a rain-free environment, and then irrigating when estimates based on potential evapotranspiration, indicated 40% depletion of available moisture in 90-cm depth of soil. The general applicability of this efficient irrigation management method was tested by experiments conducted at the West Side Field Station in the San Joaquin Valley of California with six irrigation treatments, three different row spacings (single rows on 76- and 102-cm beds, and double rows on a 102-cm bed), a semi-erect cultivar of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.), and a prostrate cultivar of lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.). Withholding irrigation during the vegetative stage following pre-irrigation substantially reduced dry matter at anthesis (−17% to −38%) and water use (−101 mm) of cowpea, but did not influence seed yield or shoot dry matter at harvest for either cowpea or lima bean. Increasing the irrigation interval until 75% nominal depletion of available water in 90-cm depth of soil reduced water use (−139 cm), but did not affect seed yield of cowpea. Lima bean, however, showed a significant decrease in shoot dry matter production (−17%) and in seed production (−18%) at the longest irrigation interval involving 75% nominal depletion. The different row spacings used in this experiment did not affect shoot dry matter or seed production of the semi-erect cowpea. However, shoot dry matter and seed yield were significantly greater for the prostrate lima bean grown with double rows on a 102-cm bed. Seed yield was 46% and 18% greater than with single rows on 76-cm and 102-cm beds, respectively. Generally, variations in seed yields of lima bean were positively correlated with variations in shoot dry matter production. Nominal depletion of available soil water provided a practical method for scheduling irrigations, but the results with cowpea indicated that the critical level, which resulted in the greatest reductions in water use while maintaining maximum seed yield varied from 40% (at Riverside) to 75% (at West Side Field Station). Additional methods are needed to fine-tune irrigation which is based mainly on nominal depletion of available water. Generally, pressure chamber estimates of leaf water potential exhibited too little variation among plants subjected to different irrigation treatments for it to be useful for fine-tuning irrigation schedules for either cowpea or lima bean. However, differences in temperature between canopy and air, when expressed as a function of either vapor pressure deficit or canopy temperature, and related to percent reduction in yield, appeared to have sufficient resolution to provide a practical method for fine-tuning irrigation schedules for cowpea during flowering and pod-filling, but not lima bean. Normalizing temperature differences with vapor pressure deficit was more effective, but normalizing with canopy temperatures is more convenient because it does not require a measurement of air humidity.