The Exile
Tags: action

Plot synopsis:
In 1660, Charles Stuart (Douglas Fairbanks, Jr.), deposed as king of England by Oliver Cromwell and the Roundheads, is in exile in the Netherlands with a few loyalists, awaiting the right opportunity to return. Whilst bartering in a local marketplace, he meets Katie (Rita Corday), a Dutch farm owner and flower seller.
When unrest in England presents both opportunity and danger, Charles's chief advisor, Sir Edward Hyde (Nigel Bruce), recommends he hide somewhere, neither too close for Roundhead assassins to find him, nor too far for news to reach him of further developments. Charles, without revealing his royal identity, persuades Katie to take him on as a farm hand. The two soon fall in love.
During his stay, Charles encounters an actor named Dick Pinner (Robert Coote) who is posing as him; the imposter stays at Katie's inn. Shortly afterward, there arrives another guest, Countess Anbella de Courteuil (María Montez), an old lover of Charles's and an emissary from King Louis of France. She presents Charles with a gift from Louis, a music box. Knowing that Katie owes 3000 guilders to her cousin, Jan (Otto Waldis), Charles has the music box sold and pays off the debt without her knowledge. Katie becomes jealous of Anbella and dismisses Charles. However, when she learns of his generosity from a gracious, departing Anbella, she takes him back.
Meanwhile, English Colonel Ingram (Henry Daniell) has been given the mission of assassinating the king. He tracks Charles to his hiding place. Charles escapes from Ingram's men, but they follow Katie and trap him in a windmill. After a sword fight, he kills Ingram, and his followers come to the rescue. Sir Edward informs him that Parliament has offered him back his throne. To take the crown, however, Charles has to leave Katie; Charles resists the idea, but Sir Edward reminds him of his duty, and Katie of what he can do for his people, and the two star-crossed lovers sadly part.
The film's original ending, preferred by Ophüls, was a bit longer than the one shown in the United States. The shorter version ends with Charles leaving for England, while the longer has a further scene in which two courtiers casually discuss a plaque that is erected to his stay.

Review: Making Dad Proud.
When Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. started his career in silent screen he did not go for the swashbuckling roles that his famous father did.
My guess is he wanted to be judged on his own as a player.
In fact it was his mother who when Fairbanks, Sr. was slow with the child support who got him into film in the first place, hoping to capitalize on the name.
Later as he got older and was established in his own right, Fairbanks made claim to the legacy of his father in such films as The Exile.In fact Fairbanks both wrote the screenplay and produced this film and got European director Max Ophuls for the piloting.
He plays a most famous exile, Charles Stuart, Charles II of Great Britain who is exiled in the Netherlands and poised to reclaim his own in 1660.The story is based on a historical novel by British writer Cosmo Hamilton and it tells of that brief interregnum in British history between the sudden death of Oliver Cromwell and the restoration of Charles II.
Charles Stuart had narrowly escaped from his country after the Puritan takeover and was living in exile in somewhat humble circumstances wherever in Europe he could find shelter.
In 1660 it was the Netherlands.Historians have debated long about the collapse of the military dictatorship of Lord Protector Oliver Cromwell.
He had things pretty much his own way and when he died his son Richard wasn't up to the job he inherited.
It was a close run thing that the United Kingdom did not break apart into civil war again at this time.By 1660 just about everybody except the most committed of Puritans felt that only a Stuart Restoration would keep the country united.
But some of those most committed Puritans had a big vested interest in seeing that the Restoration did not occur.
Therein lies the tale of this film.Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. is a perfect Charles Stuart, in fact he looks quite a bit like him.
As in real life sharing his exile is Lord Clarendon who is played here by Nigel Bruce.
When Charles reclaimed his throne, Lord Clarendon became his first minister.
In the film as in life Clarendon was constantly reminding him of his duty and not to spend all his time on frivolity and chasing skirts.
In real life after the action of this film, Charles got rid of Clarendon, but with a decent pension for loyalty and services rendered.As petitions come from various folks over in Great Britain to resume the monarchy, Charles plays coy all the time dodging Puritan agents.
Several have come to the town where he's staying and Charles has a bit of sport with them by just pretending he's a penniless exile.
He even takes a job as a laborer on Paula Corday's farm.
He even falls for her as he did with MANY women.But a most cunning and ruthless Puritan in the person of Henry Daniell arrives to take over the hunt and kill the king before he can set sail back to his realm.
This is one of Daniell's finest performances on screen, you can believe he's one cold and merciless killer and a true believer in the Puritan Revolution.
Fairbanks and Daniell have a duel in a Dutch mill that's the equal of the one Errol Flynn and Basil Rathbone had in Robin Hood.As per her contract Maria Montez got top billing as a French countess who finds Charles Stuart as a farm hand and delivers a message of support from his cousin Louis XIV of France.
Robert Coote has a very funny part as an unemployed actor who is passing himself off as Charles Stuart and who the Puritans nearly kill for such a good performance.
Fairbanks uses Coote to his own end to further his deception, but steps in when Daniell's about to run him through.The Exile is one of Douglas Fairbanks, Jr.'s finest films and he really does the part in a way that would have made Dad proud..
Swashbuckler meets visually artistic director in this sweeping, poetic and romantic -- but sadly forgotten gem..
In one of his BEST acting roles, Douglas Fairbanks, Jr.'s second stint as a movie producer--and his first as a writer--is an ambitious attempt to dramatize the tale of the restoration of Charles II to the throne of England.
An avowed Anglophile, Fairbanks has a strong sense of the history of his adoptive land.
(He was born in New York City.) Fortunately, the drama and excitement of the pursuit of Charles Stuart (Fairbanks) after his return from self-imposed exile in Holland by Oliver Cromwell's Puritans is lushly displayed by the producer-author-star's insistence on a deliberate, poetic pace for the story.
Much of the film is concerned with Fairbanks' trysting with the luscious Croset--later Paula Corday--in her first starring role, as a Royalist who conceals the fugitive king on her estate.
Despite a strong supporting cast and an interesting concept, the film is a forgotten charmer!.
Sublime!.
This is probably the least appreciated of the series of masterpieces Max Ophüls made in his too-short stay in Hollywood.
Superficially it is a fairly silly, light-hearted historical romp, and it is enjoyable enough on that level.
But this only throws into sharper relief the expressive mastery of Ophüls' style - by the end of the movie a single elegant camera move is enough to turn the mood to high tragedy.
This is sublime filmmaking..
Lost Film Treasures - Not Necessarily.
I remember seeing the preview of THE EXILE when I was 9 years old, but never actually saw the film till last night.
Reminded of this rare and all-but-forgotten picture via this website, I sought it out on the internet and purchased it for a modest price.
No disappointment.
A romantic adventure film set in 1660 combines real history with highly entertaining story.
Douglas Fairbanks Jr. was a great leading man and he plays this role with ease and vigor.
The re-creation of the era was perfect and the film has not a trace of today's annoying Attention Deficit Disorder editing.
They didn't make any good movies in 2005, as evidenced by the trashy 5 lefty-spin pictures nominated as Best Picture.
If you want to see a classic, don't give up on it.
Seek it out and with tenacity you can find it and see it.
I've only failed once, but still looking for that rarity..
Some bizarre costuming.
The costuming for this film must bring a smile to the face of anyone familiar with fashions of the 17th century.
The film's action occurs in 1660, but Fairbanks and his colleagues wear jerkins fitted to the waist, stylish about 1620-1630, but apparently considered more dashing than the loose smocks and petticoat breeches of 1660.
Then Maria Montez arrives, wearing a gown clearly from the 1880 Wild West costume rack in the Wardrobe Department.
To atone, her second frock is only a century out of kilter, something from about 1750.
I found the sound-stage exteriors very claustrophobic and phony, and I noted only 3 instances when I felt the "Ophüls touch," for example when the shutter blew open and closed, alternately revealing and concealing the lovers as they approach their first kiss.
I'm also puzzled why Max Ophüls is listed as "Opuls" in the credits, but perhaps that is a phonetic rendering to eliminate the umlaut?.
Cavaliers v Roundheads.
Maria Montez plays a French Countess in this film and headlines the show.
She's barely in the film, for goodness sake!
Her role could have been completely written out - it has no relevance to the story whatsoever.
She must have been very important.
Can someone explain?The story is set in Holland during the exile of England's King Charles II in 1660.
Douglas Fairbanks Jr. plays the king and spends the film wooing farm girl Rita Corday (Katie).
He, of course, is undercover.
An interesting sub-plot is introduced when Robert Coote shows up at the farm claiming to be King Charles II and demanding food and lodgings.
Cue humour.
Unfortunately, there is too much humour in this film - it exists in nearly every scene which is not what I was wanting.
I hoped for some actual historical fact so if you expect any truth you will be disappointed.
It's basically a love story with some sword fighting.
It could be set anywhere.
However, I am glad that the Cavaliers won.
I am a Cavalier as defined by my boys school changing-room etiquette.
You showed your willy and that put you in either the Roundhead or Cavalier camp.
We were only 5 years old and there were no teachers involved!.
Douglas Fairbanks Jr cultivating tulips together with a lovely peasant girl as a romantic king in exile in Holland.
Max Ophüls is one of the greatest directors of all times, he started as assistant director to Anatole Litvak and learned very much from him, which you can see and feel in his films: they had a unique great efficiency of direction in common, but Ophüls added to his supreme mastery also a knack for moving cameras.
You see that almost hallucinatory camera-work in every one of his films.
His Jewish origin (his real name was Maximilian Oppenheimer) gave him problems with the German Nazi regime although he was an established leading director, so he changed his name and went to France - Ophüls is an old German aristocratic name, which he felt suited his image.
He made no films between 1940 and 1947, being practically exiled but working in France and Italy and even America but returned to the screen in 1947 to make this flashing virtuoso film of exuberant romantic intrigue - the exiled king of England in constant fear of his life by the wicked roundheads escapes to a farm in Holland where he cultivates tulips with a charming country girl, with whom he naturally falls in love.
Another exiled Englishman, an errant actor out of work, exuberantly played by Robert Coote, poses to be the exiled king to be treated thereafter but is visited by a French countess who knew the real king, which complicates matters, which are further complicated as the farm is invaded by roundheads who come to root out the king dead or alive.
The film is actually written and produced by Douglas Fairbanks Jr, so it's really very much his film, and he makes the best of it in superb classical Fairbanks style with dashing duels and much kissing in between - especially impressive is the great hullabaloo with all the roundheads falling over each other in the desperate chase for the king in the windmill.
There are great windmill acrobatics here.
In brief, the film is a feast to the eyes, the story is mounting in intensity and interest all the way, the music is perfectly suited to illustrate the moods, the idylls, the drama, the tension and the high romance, it's in most ways the perfect adventure film where nothing is missing, and Max Ophüls' supreme direction and marvellous use of details crowds the film with opulent excellence from beginning to end.
In brief, after seven years' absence Ophüls was back on the screen, and his next film would be the masterpiece "Letter from an Unknown Woman"..
When the time comes....
It was the second time Ophüls had broached an historical subject .In France 1939, he filmed the tragic love story of Franz Ferdinand and Countess Sophie Chotek ,of course a misalliance,hence a Morganatic marriage.As it did not happen as Charles Stuart was concerned ,the lovers are left with memories ("I'll visit you in your dreams").If it weren't for the last minutes ,the film would not be a real Max Ophüls (spelled "Opuls") movie.The last third is a bit Curtizesque ,Douglas Faibanks Jr recalling Erroll Flynn.This is certainly a good film ,but it cannot be included in the director's best works such as "Liebelei" "La Signora Di Tutti" "Letters from an unknown woman" or "Madame De" .This is fictionalized history -whereas "De Mayerling A Sarajevo" depicted real events- where the round heads (the Puritans) ,dressed in black nicely play the parts of the villains against a noble hero dressed in white .There are good lines ;I particularly like this one "If I ever come home,I shall belong to no party" .Another good moment: "He lives in luxury and idleness" say the Puritans (a picture shows the "farm worker" plowing;"He must be ready to kill" (the man and his girl see the new-born chicks ) Maria Montez is the "star" of the film but her appearance does not exceed ten/fifteen minutes .It's Holland as we imagine it: windmills (with an impressive duel ),tulips ,canals,fair-haired girls ....
1660 and King Charles has been removed from the throne by the tyrant Cromwell,vi who never appears as a character in the film.
The closest is Henry Danielle, in his usual villainous demeanor.
His voice sounded like Richard Burton.The film gets bogged down with Douglas Fairbanks finding refuge in the house of a flower girl and farmer, with true love resulting.There was a guy, an actor pretending to be king, who really confuses things at certain points.The ending reminded me of "The Student Prince," where lovers must part for the king to pursue his responsibility..
Atavism..
Enoyable sketch of biography and adventure.
It's Max Ophul's first American movie and Douglas Fairbanks, Jr., was recently returned from honorable service in the U.S. Navy.It's well written, acted, and directed.
It's about the exiled King Charles II, Fairbanks, and his temporary refuge in Holland before being restored to the throne of England.Let me see if I've got this straight.
I don't want to have to dig it up in Wikipedia.
It's the early 1600s.
The Roundheads, under Oliver Cromwell, have taken over England lopped off the head of Charles I, Fairbanks' father, and routed Fairbacks himself.
This Cromwell had lots of passion and warts.
He cleaned things up his own way, disenfranchising the Cavaliers who supported the King.Cromwell died and, as often happens when a charismatic figure disappears, there were great arguments over what would happen next, who was the next ruler of England.
The true test of a government's viability comes not when one man or party is in power, but when that power must be passed on.
The Sunni and Shi'ite still haven't figured it out.The Cavaliers are generally thought of as adventurous, honorable, militaristic, individual aristocrats.
There were several kinds of Roundheads, ranging from the oppressive and punitive Pilgrims to the pacifistic, egalitarian and humble Quakers.
The Cavaliers believed in personal achievement, the Roundheads in the community.
The Roundheads settled New England (Plymouth was the last port they'd touched in England), while the Cavaliers settled the South (see Charleston or the Carolinas, named after the King).In this movie, Fairbanks' Charles II is the honorable hero who finds satisfaction as a bus boy in a Dutch Inn.
(Holland was a commercial and cultural force to be reckoned with at the time.) He falls for the pretty blond who hires him knowing nothing of his background.But the Roundheads are hunting for him and they're led by Henry Daniell at his most villainous -- flat black hat, black clothes, black cape, all symbols of their difference with the more colorful and flamboyant garb of the Cavaliers.
Boy, is Daniell menacing.He and the other Roundheads, bent on eliminating the throne once and for all, want to lop off Fairbanks' head too, despite his fairness and his popularity back home.
They fail.
There is a spectacular sword fight in and around a Dutch windmill -- exciting but not nearly as well done as those in, say, "The Mark of Zorro" or "Scaramouche." Fairbanks must give up his fair-haired Dutch girl friend when he becomes king.
He loves her and wants to marry her, but she has her responsibilities back in Holland.
Who will take care of her tulip garden?
(The viewer is permitted a slight chuckle here.) "I will treat these memories as roses," murmurs Fairbanks, "and put them in a box.
I will come to you in dreams." It sounds better in Fairbanks' reading than it looks in print.Not bad, overall.
A throwback to the black-and-white studio-bound films of the 1930s, with Tyrone Power or Errol Flynn as the hero.