Operator
Tags: sci-fi

Plot synopsis:
In order to cut costs, health company Welltrix chooses to automate their customer service operations thereby adding predictability but in the process eliminating customer service operators. Martin Starr plays Joe, the programmer who is creating the voice simulation software to do that. The main problem is that the script written by the software development team for the professional actresses lacks empathy. Luckily, Joe's wife Emily (Mae Whitman) is a concierge at a Chicago hotel (the Parkside) and her interaction with hotel customers is just what Welltrix is looking for. Martin asks her if she will record her voice for his 'answering machine/customer service person' and she agrees. She uses her customer service experience to 'humanize' the script and lends her voice to the new program. All works well until Joe becomes so enamored of his work that he gets more satisfaction interacting with his simulated wife than his real wife. Emily realizes this and the resulting conflict causes them to split-up. As they grow apart, Emily spends more time working at her passion: a type of improv theatre. Joe finally misses the real Emily, goes to the theatre where Emily performs and goes onstage to explain that he now realizes how he acted and misses her. The film ends with that question unresolved, will they get back together?

Review: Just so effing sad.
So here's the deal.
The movie was filmed beautifully.
The characters portrayed each other well.
But the movie was just so sad.
And the kind of sad that is not necessary.
I feel what I was watching "The Lobster" and the highlight of that movie was a dog who used to be a human getting killed.
Geese I liked the contrast of the comedy being actually sad but give us a break dammit how dark must a person's soul be to write this.
It just leaves you feeling like everything is going to sh*t and maybe that's the point but man it says COMEDY under genre.
It was just way too much for me.
I watched it and I enjoyed it and I understood it but I kind of wish I haven't because it was so depressing, even though it's perfectly fine and unique artistically.
I just don't know what to think of this movie anymore.
It depicted mental health problems, it depicted being human and making selfish mistakes, but it also depicted unrealistic moments at times.
We come to the movies to relate or to escape.
I believe this made us relate to the wrong side of us.
There was a 10 second somewhat happy ending that I won't spoil but the whole thing makes me question who did this movie do good for besides the people involved in the creating process.And a caveat: I wish we didn't always see mental disorders on such opposite ends of the spectrum.
They either depict a very positive or a very negative picture.
As you might have guessed this movie did the latter.
I think we can do better.
Also I believe that the character most likely has anxiety disorder though it cannot be said for certain without eliminating other illnesses.
It is important to note however that the "cause" of autism is not known.
There's no such thing.
The mother drinking alcohol while pregnant might increase the risk but that's it.
Anyway I'm gonna cry myself to sleep now and try to forget this movie..
This movie deserves much more praise than it's getting....
How does this have such an average to low rating, as opposed to most other overly-polished "comedies"?
Do people not get the dark humor of Operator, is that it?One of the things I personally value most in any release (whether it's movies, music or whatever), is originality.
Originality is definitely something Operator has, and at the same time pretty contemporary.
It also has very pronounced and vivid characters, without being too try-hard.
The main character manages to display autism almost perfectly.
All that, on (from the looks of it) a pretty low budget.This movie deserves much more praise than it's getting..
Explores the question of whether a human being can be reduced to data and stats.
I ended up enjoying the film because I come from the tech industry and I am generally interested in the themes explored.
I felt the acting / dialogue / cinematography was a bit mediocre.
The main theme throughout the movie was the question of whether a person can be reduced to a collection of data and statistics.
The main character Joe, believes this to be true, however most people resist this notion and find it uncomfortable.
I really enjoyed the exploration of this idea and its effects on people.
In the end, Joe's endless statistics and self quantifying make him so rigid that he is terrified of change, and he decides he must overcome this.Not sure the film makers quite nailed the ending, but still enjoyed the film..
Magnificent!.
This movie is amazing.
Beautifully written and acted.Sadly it suffers from being put in the "comedy" genre like Lost In Translation and Birdman.
Yes they are funny in parts, but ultimately the story is so sad it rips your heart out and does a little tap dance on it.That said, this dark (and sometimes funny) tale is really interesting, and I did wonder which direction the film was headed in.It was like a very long episode of Black Mirror.
So if you like your viewing beautiful, emotional, moving, hard to watch and a little bit depressing at the end ...
This bad boy is for you!Honestly - It's REALLY good.
Enjoy :).
Artificial Intelligence,Love,Relationship and Drama.
It is a story of a programmer and relation with his spouse and his friends.
And how the relationship goes down when the Joe(the programmer) starts a project with his colleague to create an Artificially Intelligent answering machine for the client of the company in which he is employed.
He involved his wife Emily on it because she is so good in handling customers and clients in a hotel in which she is working.
Meanwhile Emily(programmer's wife) has different interests like working in different kind of theater and after sometime she does't like to work with Joe. Joe ,unable to understand her feelings let her go and stick to AI software though software is kind of feels like humanly.
When he realized that Emily (AI) is not Emily(wife).
He regret that and makes everything good with her.
The story is quite interesting and contains real drama here.
If you are a programmer or person who understand little bit of Artificial Intelligence then the movie could be intimating and interesting & if you are not then also you will feel the story and drama.
Anyways this movie is full utilization of time and money .The people who worked on this movie has done great job on it.
It's good to watch movies like that..
Overrated and underwhelming.
It's an interestingly unique idea and it starts brilliantly.Then it totally falls down half way through.
It doesn't know what it is, what it wants or where it's going.
Then we get to know.
But it's not well-flagged.
Can't say much more without the spoiler tag but it just doesn't hang together well.Some observations:The mother is annoying .
No sympathy for the character at all and, more annoyingly, she has absolutely no impact on the storyline.In an attempt to add 'pace' there are a few long sequences which don't mean or do anything.And they throw in a little past-life psychology for one of the main characters, in an attempt to add weight.The actors are fine - Mae Whitman in particular is brilliant!Potential, potential potential.
Squandered, squandered, squandered.Yep, (co)writer/director.
I really should have learned by now but was momentarily wrong-footed because the director's name appears second on the writer credits.
Oy vey.As a movie, it's vastly overrated and rather under whelming.
Shame..
The charts are nice.
Especially surrounding the voice actors....
I hope she breaks a leg, but I am overwhelmed by the energy.
I'm suspicious.
We'll see...I'm getting annoyed by his level of dependence.
I saw that coming.
I don't like her.
Like a coach that thinks they have to motivate by humiliation.
No Joe. I know what you did...
And she would know how to uninstall herself...
And there is not uninstall within the app...
Ugh!I don't like Joe and I don't like the mentor.
This is a skit.
We know how people feel about someone else "dropping an app" on their phone without permission.
Come on...
kick the doorknob...
HAYou better give that phone back!
I hate people who borrow stuff and don't return it.
Or treat it previous as it is not theirs.
Clearly this bleeds into my grudge issue...
Okay.
Okay.
Colorful charts make a good seque.
Don't you dare mentor...I still don't like her methods :).
Great Indie Flick.
I was browsing through Netflix last night after watching the latest Amy Schumer special (and being disappointed) and found this movie.
I saw the description and was immediately intrigued.
Without giving too much away, Joe is a programmer that uses his wife's voice and likeness for a telephone answering system for a client.
What results is resentment on the part of his wife, Emily, as he seems to become attached to his creation (you'll see what you mean when you watch it).
It was really touching to see how great of a partner Emily is and how ignorant Joe is to his wife's needs.
It ends on a happy note though and if nothing else, I fell in love with Mae Whitman by the end of the movie.
And at the very least, it seems like a cautionary tale for how technology can consume you or sometimes replace real human connections.
If it means anything, I've been thinking about the movie since I finished watching it late last night.
Definitely recommend..
A young inspiring actress, married to a tech genius on the autism spectrum, does her best to support him, but sometimes the effort doesn't go both ways..
Though I have probably seen very few of Mae Whitman's movies or TV show appearances, I'm very much a fan.
There is just something to her that has that real girl next door vibe.
Not the Hollywood version of the idea, but the actual girl you grew up with, hanged out with damn near every day, and be it romantic or not, pretty much they became someone you couldn't imagine life without.
Something she brings to each character, that's I've seen, and with that said let's talk about Operator.Characters & StoryEmily (Mae Whitman)Emily is a 20 something-year-old young woman who is very much in love.
She loves her husband Joe, his kooky mother, as well as this 30 plays in 60 minutes troupe she joined.
Thanks to Joe by the way.
But alongside the things she loves, she has this one thing she hates.
That is working at this hotel in which she is the concierge.
A job she is good at, to an almost ridiculous extent, and it is the calming nature of her voice, her ability to soothe Joe even when she isn't there, that leads him to choose her for the voice of his automated healthcare system AI.A software program which, as Emily evolves and becomes more comfortable in her writing and acting, seems like more of a burden on her relationship than her means of supporting Joe's company.Joe (Martin Starr)His mother drinked while she was pregnant, his father left and rarely visited, he has panic attacks when things are stressful and is very likely on the autism spectrum.
Despite all this, and what comes with it, Emily loves him anyway.
So, to the best of his abilities, Joe tried to do for her what she does for him.
However, as an analytical programmer, a quite talented one at that, Joe is about data and probability.
So random chance increasingly becomes something he doesn't want included in his life.
So between the AI version of Emily and this increasingly unpredictable one, which one is better is hard for him to choose.Collected Quote(s)Sometimes, people just need to know somebody is in charge.— OperatorHighlightsMae WhitmanIt is hard to not get so much out of Whitman's performance as Emily.
There is this consistent pursuit of understanding Joe and even trying to work with her mother in law Beth (Christine Lahti) and there is this authenticity to it.
She isn't played, or written as, someone who is long suffering with these two.
Even without us getting to see them date and just getting a blurb of how she and Joe met, you somehow fully understand she loves these two and through that finds the strength to deal with Joe's panic attacks and can yell and focus her mother in law's mind so she can get her life- saving medicine.And while this may not be an Oscar-worthy performance, I think it proves that if Whitman was given the right script and excellent co- stars, her name would be getting read off the teleprompter.
For, to me, she is what elevates this movie into something worth checking out and everyone else, they are simply adequate.CriticismEmily's BackgroundWhile Emily is written, in a way, to be more than simply Joe's love interest, considering how we meet Joe's mom, learn about his dad's abandonment and how that affected him, it makes you wonder what Emily's background is?
This especially comes into play as you see how supportive she is of Joe and it makes you wonder if she is emulating her parents and their relationship together or with her, or trying to do as they didn't.
But the real issue perhaps is that the movie makes it seem Emily's life and past begins with her meeting Joe and everything else is pretty much left for you to assume or guess.On The FenceJoeThe issue with Joe is that, on top of the film using your usual romantic film trajectory, it places all of the burden on Joe for why things go wrong.
Emily is made out to be perfect, almost blameless in their marital issues, and she almost seems like a saint at times.
Meanwhile, Joe spirals into madness as Emily doesn't even change.
She just has less time to fully dedicate herself to him.Relating this to Short Term 12, in that film Brie Larson plays someone with depression and her love interest in that movie is supportive as can be, but not to Emily like proportions.
He stumbles, fails as her rock, and even at times makes it seem too much for one person to handle.
To me, Emily needed to have those moments, to vent to friends, and not seemingly just be Joe's wife.
For even with the acting troupe thing, we don't get to see her bond and try to navigate her feelings with her peers.
She just does one play explaining it and that's it.
Much less, when she leaves Joe, we aren't sure where she goes and that adds onto the issue of never really getting to know Emily for everything is about Joe.Overall: MixedIt's the imbalance that screws things up.
That and your usual romantic film trajectory.
If Joe didn't have to bear the weight of him and Emily having marital issues this film could have been better.
Also, if we got to understand more what Emily got out of the relationship, as well as who she was before him, maybe we could understand why she invested and stuck with Joe. Unfortunately, those elements are missing.
So it leaves Emily as a figure who, on top of not having any flaws, seems to be with this man for reasons you sometimes can't fathom..
Interesting relationship story, lots going on under the surface..
I found this movie on Netflix streaming movies.
It is primarily a relationship story about a young married couple.
He is a programmer and she is in customer service.
He is bright but "technical" while she is bright and friendly with lots of empathy.Martin Starr is the programmer, Joe Larsen, his project is designing something that most of us encounter every time we make a call to a company.
A software system that uses human voices and programmed to find out what you need and direct you to the appropriate department.
Something real people used to do, just a few years ago.Joe was having difficulty with the voice until he realized that his cute wife, Mae Whitman as Emily Klein, had the perfect voice and perfect characteristics for his project.
Against her better judgment she let him record conversations she made in the normal course of her job and he in turn used her as his source for the programming.Had it only been that everything would have been fine.
However it takes a darker turn as Joe begins to pay more attention to his programmed voice than to his wife.
To the point that he was relying on the computerized conversations for sexual arousal.
The reason I found this movie worthwhile is it explores, in a fictional way, the impact of technology on our personal lives and how it may easily interfere with normal human relationships.
Both actors are excellent in their roles.