Avouterie
Tags: revenge

Plot synopsis:
Samuel (Sean Faris) returns home to find his wife Ashley (Danielle Savre) cheating on him with Damien (Mehcad Brooks) on their anniversary, holding them captive at gunpoint on a hot New Orleans day, while he decides their fates.
At first, Samuel shoots both of them, but then finds himself re-experiencing the events in his mind. Instead of shooting them, he forces Ashley and Damien to disclose about their personal lives and their sexual encounters. From them Sam learns that Damien has a wife, Jasmine, who is two months pregnant, and that Ashley's abusive ex-boyfriend was actually her ex-husband (It is not clear if Ashley is a bigamist). Sam calls Jasmine (Steffinnie Phrommany), to have sexual intercourse with him to show them how he felt about being cheated upon. Samuel justifies his decision to kill Damien using his religious beliefs and Russian Roulette. Ashley and Sam proceed to enjoy their anniversary with Damien's dead body less than 5 feet away.
Sam later finds himself back in reality, just after burying Damien beneath the roses. He regrets his previous actions and his possible choices in his mind. But overall he killed his wife and Damien.

Review: You can feel the anguish in this film....
The film begins with Sammy returning home early from work to surprise his wife with gifts on their anniversary.
He finds her home early and she is "getting busy" with another man.
He quietly closes the door, goes and grabs his guns then comes back up stairs...The question that comes up is: Who has the right to judge?
Does Sammy have the right to judge?
Just because someone betrays us, are we supposed to take the law into our own hands?
Or does this go deeper than that.
Is it Justice Sammy wants?
I appreciate the excellent acting given by the characters.
Their response to the situation: the anguish, the hurt, the sadness and pain could be felt in this film.
I gave this film a high rating because of topic matter and acting skills.This film contains all kinds of graphic language, violence, and nudity.
Just a warning..
Interesting movie.
I found this movie to be very entertaining and well acted.
Lots of tension trying to determine whether he is going to shoot one or both of the adulters.
I found myself thinking that you really couldn't blame him if he did, given the circumstances.
Regarding the accents that some have a problem with, who cares.
That really shouldn't detract from the movie at all..
Unwatchable.
Sean Faris should win an award for the worst Louisiana accent ever.
He sounds like a southern Texas teenage girl going with that trendy vocal fry voice.
Wtf. How could anyone who has ever been to New Orleans think that was OK?
I might consider watching the movie again.
I'd have to mute the audio and turn on subtitles.
Terrible....
Pretty much ruined my whole day.
Sad because the plot seemed like it would be interesting.
I'm going to drink away any memory of that horrible voice.
What a waste.
How many lines do I need for this?.
How many lines do I need for this?.
How many lines do I need for this?.
How many lines do I need for this?.
An awkwardly acted and poorly written mess..
Not every film you see is something you've been anticipating for a long time.
Sometimes you see a movie and think "hmm that looks interesting." Such was the case for Adulterers.
It's safe to say most people will go into this film with that mind set and hopefully they'll remember that this film is an independent project with a lower budget.Right off the back, it's important to know this script is all over the place.
Dialogue in most scenes feels so off it's difficult to listen to.
It doesn't help when the acting feels so overdone that it's not being delivered.
There are several occasions where some tension will build only to be torn down by the following line being terribly delivered or a reaction from the characters that feels completely unbelievable; cringe-worthy even.The premise itself is simple and a perfect set up for a thriller.
Your average guy comes home on his anniversary to find his wife cheating on him and the rest of the film experience is to find out whether or not he kills them.
Moving along the story, you learn certain "twists" about certain characters which keeps things interesting and new.
A few of these attempt are indeed interesting.
The rest feel out of place and make you ask "Wait...
what?" Outrageous and disturbing behavior/content aside, you may wonder why you're sticking around to see how it ends.Here are some almost strengths.
Yes, there are a few of those.
As mentioned before, despite how bad the writing might be, the filmmakers do a good job and holding on to you to see how it ends.
Tension does indeed build enough so that you're a part of the thrill ride.
The progression and structure of the story itself is compelling.
Granted, it's obvious the filmmaker was trying desperately hard to be a Scorsese/Shyamalan (early Shyamalan).
However, it makes for a solid and thought-provoking ending to the film.
Aside from the "strength" it's hard to recommend this film to anyone who's looking for an absolutely fantastic thriller.
It won't be found here but if you're searching around Netflix and have nothing to watch.
There might be worse films to use an hour and a half with..
Stop it with the AWFUL Louisiana "accents" Hollywood!.
It was a decent premise and could have made a good film but from the opening credits, the guy sounded like he belonged in Steel Magnolias as opposed to being in New Orleans.
Everyone has heard New Orleans accents by now and they should know they aren't dripping in sweet tea & magnolias.
Get it right and maybe, MAYBE I could watch the film again.
Not only was it a terribly fake accent from all who attempted it, it was SO FORCED -- sometimes there, sometimes not.Other people might like it better than I did if they can ignore the accents or don't care that they're fake.
I've seen worse acting at a local high school, and the plot was plausible and interesting..
Yea team!
yea adultery!.
This film is an excellent textbook example of the bankruptcy of fundamentalist Christian morality.
The plot is straightforward: a man comes home from work on his wedding anniversary and finds his wife having sex with another man.
He pulls a gun on them and the rest of the movie is the conversation they have while he decides whether to kill one or both.
A loving marriage is clearly defined as one in which nobody cheats.The man calls the wife of the adulterer, who runs over and denounces her husband and then has the first man has sex with her in front of her husband and the first man's wife.
They are seriously tortured over this—witnessing their spouse having sex with someone else (as punishment?
for their having sex with someone else?) It turns out that the husband's boss repeatedly raped the wife when she was in highschool and she let him because her father worked for him and needed the job and she loved her father.
The movie gets her shot but leaves the completely unremorseful boss scott free.
I guess the difference is she is a woman and he is a man; or, he is a capitalist and she is just a worker.So the definition of married love and fidelity is that penises stay out of extramarital vaginas.
This is supposed to be morally inspiring and indicating the spiritual wonder of the old testament.The horror of forced sex on the highschool girl is suggested as the source of her infidelity.
This isn't a psychological analysis, however; it's just cause/effect, and she blames herself for it.
Also, the bizarre sex between the good husband and the betrayed wife of the adulterer is just shown as something that happens—doesn't seem to affect either the wife or the husband.None of these people pay attention to the bible, although they can quote chapter and verse.
Their reactions and their decisions appear to be completely independent of scripture, although scripture is quoted.
So one has the sense that this movie is directed to nominal fundamentalist Christians and gives them an excuse for various sexual activities on the grounds that they had a bad childhood, suffered abuse, etc.
Further, the movie implicitly condones the cold-blooded murder of two people..
I'm from Louisiana....& those accents were AWFUL.
How did they make an entire movie without anyone telling them they weren't in Alabama or something?
Makes the movie pretty hard to watch and totally unconvincing.
Ew. Every single time Samuel spoke, I cringed.
I was born and raised in southern Louisiana and no one I have ever know sounds like that haha.I would not recommend to anyone.I really can't even write ten lines about this garbage movie..
it's pretty dull and inauthentic.I hope I've written enough at this point.
Watch it for fifteen minutes before you turn it off like I did.
You will be let down.:).
Do not watch this movie if you are in about relationship.
Yes there are sometimes in the movie that are very shocking and satisfied I personally went through something similar To tell you the truth I would did the exact Same check this movie out it is original 
A lot of Over-acting in this movie.
I've seen many bad movies in my life, but this one is probably on the top 10 worse movies i've ever seen.I mean, the over-acting from all actors made me wana cring.
Firstly, that Sean Faris guy is just awful in everything he does.
Starting with the way he is acting all romantic while on the phone with his wife, and also the way he is Mr.Friendly guy at his work, and finally as Mr.Angry at his wife.
He also tries to show-off his muscles every time the cam is on him lol.I also got disgusted with the amount of sweat in that room.
Just Imagine the smell :-S.anyhow, Bad movie, not worth watching.
One spoiler only.
First of all, to the concerns of the "fake" accents, Sean Faris is actually from Texas, so the complaint that he sounded Texan is a bit silly in my estimation.
Who is to say he didn't live in Texas in some earlier time not dealt with in the movie?
Second, the guy has an amazing range and does some very believable roles on such diverse networks as Hallmark and Lifetime.
Some absolutely great people and some not-so-nice.
But all complex.
I think he is very underrated and, although not difficult to look at, he is far more than eye candy.
Also as to the reviewer who complained about him showing his muscles, he happens to be a fitness expert in real life.
He in my opinion was not showing off to the camera but simply looks good from any angle.
As to the movie itself it is one you have to watch constantly in order to follow, and that is actually part of the power of it.
Much of the dialogue is done without musical background and causes one to pay more attention.
The only spoiler I will say is that you are left, even at the very end, not knowing for sure exactly what parts were fantasy and which were actual memories or conversation.
The writing could have been slightly better but even that not bad for the most part.
I found myself invested in all 3 of the main characters and honestly sympathetic to each..
Mistake vs choice?.
I thought all 3 actors were really good.
The intensity and range of emotions of all 3 seemed so real that I had to keep reminding myself that it is just a movie.
This movie really hit home as I once had a cheating & deceptive wife.
A lot of things go through your mind initially.
When adulterers get caught, they almost always say: "I'm so sorry, I made a mistake.
What's really going on is they are not sorry for cheating on you.
They are sorry that they got caught.
Cheating is a " Choice" not a mistake.
This is what I think this excellent movie is telling us.
Walking in on something like this makes you feel like your heart, along with your trust is ripped out of you.
The husband in the movie had a right to be angry.
However the way he is showing his anger via violence is wrong.
The best thing to do is just leave the two adulterers and file for divorce.
That's what needs to be done.
There is no way of trying to put the pieces back together.
The relationship will always have painful scars.
This movie is one that every potential adulterer should watch..
Don't hate me.
Sammy (Sean Faris) who has to work a double, comes home at lunch to surprise his wife (Rebecca Reaney) only to get more surprised as he catches her in the act with another man (Mehcad Brooks).
At gun point we get their biographies and intimate details of the affair.
This is a soap opera drama which is basically a three man play.
Okay for what it was, I just didn't find it entertaining.Based on true events in New Orleans, although I am sure this scenario has been played out more than once.Guide: F-bomb, sex, nudity (Rebecca Reaney)