crossing96/oncoscreening huggingface dataset:
[Barrett's Esophagus: Update on the Diagnosis and Treatment. Review].	Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the condition in which a metaplastic columnar mucosa predisposed to neoplasia replaces the squamous mucosa of the distal esophagus. The current guidelines recommends that diagnosis requires the finding of intestinal metaplasia (IM) with goblet cells of at least 1 cm in length. BE affects approximately 1% of the general population and up to 14% of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). BE is a precursor of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), which has increased in western countries. The main risk factors described for EAC associated with BE are male sex, age > 50 years, central obesity and tobacco use. Annual risk of EAC in patients with BE without dysplasia, low grade (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia is 0,1-0,3%, 0,5% y 5-8%, respectively. Treatment of non-dysplastic BE consists mainly of a healthy lifestyle change, chemoprevention with proton pump inhibitors and surveillance endoscopy every 3 to 5 years. It is recommended that from the presence of LGD patients are referred to an expert center for confirmation of the diagnosis, stage and thus define their management. In patients with BE and dysplasia or early-stage cancer, endoscopic therapy with resection and ablation is successful in about 90% of the patients. The main adverse event is esophageal stricture, which is managed endoscopically.	esophagus
Clinical and genetic characteristics of patients with TRG 0 and TRG III in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy.	Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is an important treatment for patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but neoadjuvant resistance affects the overall treatment outcome. Therefore, it is particularly important to accurately screen the population for NAT and explore the mechanism of resistance. Usually, different chemotherapy regimens cause different drug resistance mechanisms. Prior to combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy, extensive research has been conducted on previous drug resistance mechanisms. Currently, the mainstream NAT for ESCC involves chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. We have witnessed the remarkable effect of this combination therapy; however, there are still a considerable number of patients whose tumor tissues show no change or even progress after NAT, and their drug resistance mechanisms remain unclear. Hence, we aim to identify relevant evidence that can distinguish and predict the effectiveness of NAT from a clinical perspective in order to provide a clinical basis for future screening of suitable populations for NAT and discovery of drug resistance mechanisms. This study is based in China's high incidence area of esophageal cancer, where enrolled patients all receive the current mainstream NAT regimen resulting in more reliable outcomes.	esophagus
(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography parameters are associated with histological outcomes in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.	Endoscopic submucosal dissection is a standard treatment for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, submucosal or lymphovascular invasion increases the risk of lymph node metastasis. Although (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) parameters are associated with prognosis in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, the utility of FDG PET/CT in diagnosing superficial esophageal carcinoma remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between FDG PET/CT parameters and histopathological findings in superficial esophageal carcinoma. Fifty-three patients with superficial esophageal cancer who underwent FDG PET/CT scans before undergoing interventions were retrospectively analyzed. The maximal standardized uptake value (SUV(max)), metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis were significantly higher in the cases with submucosal invasion (T1b) compared with those confined to the muscularis mucosa (T1a). In contrast, classification of intrapapillary capillary loops patterns with magnifying endoscopy did not yield statistical differences between T1a and T1b. Multivariable analysis revealed that SUV(max) was the only independent predictor of submucosal and lymphovascular invasion. This study demonstrated that SUV(max) may be useful in predicting submucosal and lymphovascular invasion. Thus, the value of SUV(max) may guide clinical decision-making in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.	esophagus
Information Needs in Patients with Potentially Curable Gastroesophageal Cancer.	INTRODUCTION: Gastroesophageal cancer patients' information needs remain understudied, despite their complex treatment trajectories. METHODS: This study examined the (i) information needs of patients with or without postoperative complications, (ii) information needs of male and female patients, and (iii) the association between information needs and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) following gastroesophageal cancer surgery. Patients completed the EORTC-QLQ-INFO25, QLQ-C30, and QLQ-OG25 questionnaires before and after curative surgery. Five information needs domains were investigated: information about the disease, about treatments, about medical tests, about things patients can do to help themselves, and overall helpfulness. Additionally, HR-QoL domains global health status, eating restrictions, and anxiety were explored. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients completed the questionnaires at baseline, 216 patients at 6-12 months, 184 patients at 18-24 months, and 163 patients at 3-5 years post-operation. There were no significant differences in information needs between patients with or without complications or between male and female patients. Patients with a higher global health status found the information more helpful at 6-12 months (p &lt; 0.001), 18-24 months (p &lt; 0.001), and 3-5 years (p &lt; 0.001) postoperatively, as did patients who experienced more anxiety at 18-24 months (p = 0.009) and 3-5 years (p &lt; 0.001). CONCLUSION: Gastroesophageal cancer patients, regardless of sex or postoperative complications, have consistent information needs, yet those with higher global health status and elevated anxiety levels find the information particularly helpful, emphasizing the importance of tailored communication strategies.	esophagus
Quality performance indicators for oesophageal and gastric cancer: ANZ expert Delphi consensus.	BACKGROUND: Quality performance indicators for the management of oesophagogastric cancer can be used to objectively measure and compare the performance of individual units and capture key elements of patient care to improve patient outcomes. METHODS: Two systematic reviews were completed to identify evidence-based quality performance indicators for the surgical management of oesophagogastric cancer. Based on the indicators identified, a two-round modified Delphi process with invitations was sent to all members of the Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand Gastric and Oesophageal Surgery Association. The expert working group discussed each suggested indicator and either removed, added, or adjusted the list of indicators of oesophagogastric cancer. RESULTS: The final list of both OG cancer indicators included Specialized Multi-disciplinary team discussion, Endoscopy documentation, Staging Contrast CT Chest/Abdomen and Pelvis, Neoadjuvant or Adjuvant chemo/radiotherapy administered in accordance with the Local multi-disciplinary team, Pathological margin clearance (R0 Resection), Lymphadenectomy retrieving 15 or more nodes, Formal review of pathological findings and documentation, Postoperative complications, 30-day and 90-day postoperative mortality, clinical surveillance and Specialized Dietetic guidance. Indicators specific to gastric cancer included Preoperative biopsy for pathological diagnosis and Staging Laparoscopy. Indicators specific to oesophageal cancer include positron emission tomography scan if CT negative for metastasis, Perioperative Oesophagectomy Care Pathway, length of stay of 21 days or more, and Unplanned readmission within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study present a core set of indicators for the surgical management of oesophagogastric cancer that can be used to measure quality and compare performance between different units.	esophagus
Etiologic factors for Barrett's esophagus: toward countermeasures in Asia.	INTRODUCTION: Over the past several decades, Europe and the United States have experienced a rapid increase in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Research and countermeasures against Barrett's esophagus, its precancerous lesion, are progressing. Because esophageal adenocarcinoma has an extremely poor prognosis when diagnosed in an advanced stage, recommendations for early cancer detection have been made based on the various proven etiological factors of Barrett's esophagus and the actual cancer risk of Barrett's esophagus. In recent years, there have been indications of an increase in esophageal adenocarcinoma in Japan, and a similar trend of cancer will occur shortly in other Asian countries. Consequently, Asian countries must implement similar countermeasures against Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma, referencing the knowledge gained thus far in Europe and the United States. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes the latest findings on the etiologic factors of Barrett's esophagus and discusses the differences between Westerners and Asians. The current status of Barrett's esophagus in Japan and other Asian countries is also summarized. EXPERT OPINION: The etiological factors and cancer incidence of Barrett's esophagus in Asia diverge somewhat from those observed in Europe and America. Therefore, it is imperative to implement measures that are tailored to the actual circumstances of Asian people.	esophagus
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in NRG Oncology RTOG 0436: a phase III trial evaluating the addition of cetuximab to paclitaxel, cisplatin, and radiation for esophageal cancer treated without surgery.	PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: NRG/RTOG 0436 evaluated cetuximab added to chemoradiation (CRT) for non-operative esophageal cancer management. PRO objectives assessed improvement in the FACT-Esophageal cancer subscale (ECS), version 4, with cetuximab, and if improved ECS correlated with clinical complete response (cCR). MATERIALS/METHODS: Patients were randomized to cisplatin/paclitaxel/radiation ± cetuximab. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, with a 420 patient target, which also provided 82% power to detect ≥ 15 increase in the proportion of cetuximab patients with ECS improvement from baseline to 6-8 weeks post-CRT; α = 0.05, using a χ(2) test. Improvement in ECS and its Swallowing and Eating Indices (SI, EI) was defined as 5, 4 and 2 point increases, respectively, from baseline to 6-8 weeks post-CRT. Univariate logistic regression assessed if cCR was associated with improved ECS. RESULTS: This study was stopped early for not meeting a pre-specified OS endpoint and did not show survival benefit. Of 420 planned patients, 344 enrolled and 281 consented to PROs. ECS was completed by 261 (93%) at baseline, 173 (66%) 6-8 weeks post-CRT, and 117 (64%) at 1 year. At 6-8 weeks, patients receiving CRT + Cetuximab didn't have improved ECS; they experienced a lower proportion of improvement compared to standard CRT (37% vs. 53%; P = 0.04). The proportion of CRT patients with improvement in SI was 9% higher than with cetuximab, but not statistically significant (39% vs. 30%, P = 0.22). There was no association between treatment and EI. When examining ECS scores at 1 year by cCR vs. residual disease, a higher proportion of cCR patients improved, but not statistically significant (48% vs. 45%, P = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of cetuximab to CRT for the nonoperative management of esophageal cancer did not improve PROs.	esophagus
Combined Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Induction for Screening of Patients with Cervical Esophageal Carcinoma for Subsequent Local Treatment: A New Treatment Paradigm.	BACKGROUND: Definitive chemoradiotherapy is recommended as the primary treatment for cervical esophageal carcinoma (CEC). However, local control rates remain unsatisfactory for some patients. Therefore, in this study, we introduced a new treatment paradigm for individuals with CEC, customizing the choice between subsequent local treatments based on their response to induction chemotherapy and immunotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Induction treatment comprised two to four cycles of chemotherapy combined with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors. Patients achieving complete response (CR) or near CR after induction treatment underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT), while those not achieving CR or near CR underwent surgical resection. RESULTS: Among the 40 eligible patients, 14 (35.0%) achieved a CR or near CR after induction treatment. Of the ten patients achieving a CR or near CR, one developed an esophageal fistula after dCRT (10.0%). Among the eight non-CR or non-near CR patients receiving chemoradiotherapy, six developed esophageal fistula (75.0%). Among the 26 patients who did not achieve CR or near CR after induction treatment, the 1-year cancer specific survival (CSS) rates were 93.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.815-1%] for the 18 patients in the surgery group, and 71.4% (95% CI 0.447-1%) for the 8 patients in the chemoradiotherapy group (p = 0.027). The overall laryngeal preservation rate was 85.0% (34/40), with a functional laryngeal preservation rate of 77.5% (31/40). CONCLUSION: The approach consisting of combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy successfully identified patients who were responding well to induction treatment and who were sensitive to radiotherapy, for chemoradiotherapy; thus, improving laryngeal preservation rates. In addition, it also identified patients with poor responses to induction treatment and radiotherapy, for timely surgery; hence, reducing radiotherapy complications and enhancing survival.	esophagus
Prognostic factors for esophageal respiratory fistula in unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiotherapy.	Limited studies have focused on the prognostic factors of esophageal respiratory fistula (ERF) associated with radiotherapy in patients with unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Between January 1st, 2014 and January 1st, 2021, we included patients who were initially diagnosed with unresectable ESCC and underwent radiotherapy. All patients were followed up for a period of 2 years after completing their radiotherapy treatment. The primary outcomes of the study were defined as death or severe adverse events. The survival curves of ERF were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards model was employed to calculated the prognostic factors. A cohort of 232 patients underwent radiotherapy, of whom 32 patients experienced ERF. The median period from initial diagnosis of ESCC to ERF was 5.75 months, and the median period from ERF to the primary outcome was 4.6 weeks. Neck + upper chest location (odds ratio [OR] 3.305), high T stage (OR 1.765), esophageal stenosis (OR 1.073), high neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (OR 1.384) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (OR 1.765) were risk factors for the occurrence of ERF. Cox regression analysis suggested that tumor location (hazards ratio [HR] 3.572, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.467-5.1), high T stage (HR 4.050, 95% CI 2.812-5.831), esophageal stenosis (HR 2.643, 95% CI 1.753-3.983), high PLR (HR 2.541, 95% CI 1.868-3.177) were independent prognostic factors for poor survival. Esophageal stenosis, neck + upper chest tumor location, high T stage and PLR predicted the prognosis of ERF in ESCC patients undergoing radiotherapy.	esophagus
Maximum Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Occurs in Esophageal Cancer Patients With a Low Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Good Performance Status Prior to Treatment.	BACKGROUND/AIM: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play an important role in the treatment of esophageal cancer (EC). However, few patients achieve long-term survival, and some patients develop serious immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Reliable predictive biomarkers of efficacy and safety need to be established in order to improve efficacy. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of nivolumab monotherapy on EC at Showa University, Department of Medicine, to identify biomarkers and characteristics of patients who benefit from ICI monotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients with EC who received nivolumab monotherapy were included in the present study. Patient characteristics, efficacy, and safety were analyzed. A multivariable analysis evaluated the correlation among overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), best overall response (BOR), irAEs, and the following variables: sex, age, performance status (PS), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein (CRP) level, albumin level, and body-mass index before treatment. RESULTS: Median PFS was 3.1 months, and median OS was 9.0 months. In multivariable analysis, pretreatment PS, NLR, and sex were significantly correlated with OS and PFS. NLR <3.3 predicted longer survival (median OS 17.5 vs. 6.4 months for NLR ≥3.3; p<0.001). Median OS was 10.6 months for PS 0-1 and 1.3 months for PS 2-3 (p<0.001). NLR remained significantly predictive in the PS 0-1 group. The development of irAEs was significantly associated with increased OS and PFS. CONCLUSION: Patients with low NLR and good PS before treatment may maximize the benefits of ICIs. A low NLR may be an indicator of higher immunocompetence for anti-tumor immunity, suggesting that NLR may be a convenient predictive biomarker in daily practice.	esophagus
Navigating complexities and considerations for suspected anastomotic leakage in the upper gastrointestinal tract: A state of the art review.	This state-of-the-art review explores the intricacies of anastomotic leaks following oesophagectomy and gastrectomy, crucial surgeries for globally increasing esophageal and gastric cancers. Despite advancements, anastomotic leaks occur in up to 30 % and 10 % of oesophagectomy and gastrectomy cases, respectively, leading to prolonged hospital stays, substantial impact upon short- and long-term health-related quality of life and greater mortality. Recognising factors contributing to leaks, including patient characteristics and surgical techniques, are vital for preoperative risk stratification. Diagnosis is challenging, involving clinical signs, biochemical markers, and various imaging modalities. Management strategies range from non-invasive approaches, including antibiotic therapy and nutritional support, to endoscopic interventions such as stent placement and emerging vacuum-assisted closure devices, and surgical interventions, necessitating timely recognition and tailored interventions. A step-up approach, beginning non-invasively and progressing based on treatment success, is more commonly advocated. This comprehensive review highlights the absence of standardised treatment algorithms, emphasizing the importance of individualised patient-specific management.	esophagus
The implementation status of prehabilitation during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer: a questionnaire survey to the board-certified facilities in Japan.	BACKGROUND: Prehabilitation during neoadjuvant therapy has the potential to improve clinical outcomes. However, information on its global dissemination status is limited. This Japanese nationwide survey investigated the implementation status of and barriers to prehabilitation during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer in hospitals. METHODS: This multicenter nationwide survey was conducted by post. The eligible facilities were 155 Japanese hospitals that had been certified within the last 10 years as authorized institutes for board-certified esophageal surgeons by the Japan Esophageal Society. We administered an original questionnaire to investigate the current status of prehabilitation during NAC. RESULTS: The response rate was 75% (117/155 facilities). Forty-six facilities (39%) provided prehabilitation during NAC. The most frequently selected reasons for not providing or providing insufficient prehabilitation were lack of human resources, issues with the reimbursement of medical fees, difficulty in providing continuous prehabilitation during repeated inpatient and outpatient care, the lack of established standard prehabilitation programs, challenges in providing multidisciplinary prehabilitation, and difficulty in managing physical symptoms. CONCLUSION: We observed that the implementation rate of prehabilitation during NAC was low. Critical reasons were not only the lack of medical resources but also the lack of evidence-based standard prehabilitation programs during NAC and the lack of evidence for how to continuously deliver prehabilitation during NAC to patients with physical symptoms.	esophagus
Risk and pathologic factors of recurrence after endoscopic resection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.	BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The risk and pathologic factors of recurrence after endoscopic resection (ER) for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are inconsistent across studies. We evaluated this in a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: The data of recurrence in such patients were extracted from all studies. Risk ratios (RRs) were combined using random-effects meta-analysis to assess pooled recurrence rate and pathologic risk factors. Relapse-free survival was combined using the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate the relationship between various pathologic factors and recurrence time. RESULTS: We identified 26 studies, with a total of 5100 patients and 321 with recurrences (pooled rate, 6.2%). The risk of recurrence was significantly higher in positive vertical margin (RR, 4.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.16-9.44), positive horizontal margin (RR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.57-4.13), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (RR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.75-3.11; P < .001), lymphatic invasion (LI) (RR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.24-4.06), and tumor invading submucosa of ≤200 μm (SM1) (RR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.32-2.21, compared to muscularis mucosa). Patients with LI (hazard ratio, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.24-4.90; P = .02) and LVI (HR, 2.36; 95% CI, 2.22-4.59; P = .0006) tended to have earlier recurrence after ER. CONCLUSIONS: The recurrence rate of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after ER is acceptable. Patients with positive margins, LVI, LI, and SM1 need to pay significant attention to the risk of recurrence. LI and VI should be evaluated separately. (PROSPERO CRD42023406309.).	esophagus