diff --git "a/en-val.tsv" "b/en-val.tsv" new file mode 100644--- /dev/null +++ "b/en-val.tsv" @@ -0,0 +1,21962 @@ + title username timestamp decision comment topic policies policy_title policy_index +0 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebrity news User:ST47 15:50, 20 August 2006 (UTC) delete as per a dictionary Deletion of Celebrity news WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BBC One logos User:The_Thadman 02:26, 3 February 2007 (UTC) delete An article on Wikipedia is |not just a group of images Deletion of BBC One logos WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian's Indie User:MisterHand 16:47, 15 January 2006 (UTC) delete nn and apparent |vanity Deletion of Ian's Indie WP:VAIN Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +3 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karachi Kings–Lahore Qalandars rivalry NONE NONE keep """Seems like a legitimate rivalry: I am not an expert in Cricket but this one has s per and passes - most of the references below describe this rivalry and """"biggest"""" and """"intense"""" etc. Finally per RIVALRY This passes the requirement of NRIVALRY because of the RS. {{tq|Sports rivalries are not inherently notable. Articles on sports rivalries, such as Yankees–Red Sox rivalry, should satisfy the general notability guideline""" Deletion of Karachi Kings–Lahore Qalandars rivalry WP:RS||WP:NEXIST||WP:N||WP:NRIVALRY Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ocean State Green Party User:Heartmusic678 15:33, 8 September 2021 (UTC) delete Fails . None of the sources currently on the page are reliable and unrelated to the the party. I could not find any reliable secondary sources that pass Deletion of Ocean State Green Party WP:ORGIN||WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leejay Abucayan User:Leesome 16:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC) comment """I agree with the editor above who pointed out that none of the """"sources"""" provided by Leejay Abucayan are reliable for establishing his """"notability."""" Most of the material in the sources is self-generated. What little third-party material he has provided fails the standard. Look at the """"article"""" about him in Sacramento Magazine--it's not an article at all, it's just a short blurb, and it shares the page with short blurbs about a hair salon and a car-repair shop!! Obviously, we're not going to have articles here about hair salons and car-repair places. That's '''''NOT''''' what personal notability is about, and that's not what an encyclopedia is about. Mr. Abucayan, please read so that you will understand what kind of sources you need to provide to us""" Deletion of Leejay Abucayan WP:RELIABLE Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +6 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/School prank (3rd nomination) User:Optichan 15:44, 19 June 2006 (UTC) keep Get rid of any |unverifiable stuff Deletion of School prank (3rd nomination) WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +7 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smokers Die Younger User:Arthurrh 00:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC) delete I don't see any notability established, and a quick web search mostly found sites created/managed by them. I didn't see anything from a third-party Deletion of Smokers Die Younger WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +8 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ethnic minority politicians in the United Kingdom User:Marquis 20:27, 14 June 2015 (UTC) delete per above, a and largely nightmare with no clear criteria in sight. It almost qualifies for speedy deletion under as one of the creations of Deletion of List of ethnic minority politicians in the United Kingdom WP:V||WP:BLP||WP:G5 Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +9 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/619 Wrestling Move User:Safiel 22:21, 1 September 2011 (UTC) delete Fails otability Deletion of 619 Wrestling Move WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +10 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob McDowall (3rd nomination) User:Jbhunley 12:55, 17 June 2016 (UTC) delete Not enough coverage in |independent, |reliable sources to |verify or |sustian article. Fails |Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines or and . I found some passing mentions and quotes but no significant coverage Deletion of Rob McDowall (3rd nomination) WP:IS||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:NRV||WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +11 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Good Things (film) User:Ravenswing 20:26, 13 May 2008 (UTC) keep If the movie is filming, it no longer violates Deletion of All Good Things (film) WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +12 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirkan Aydın User:The 21:40, 1 January 2009 (UTC) delete Not indicate inportance of significanse. Also completly fails Deletion of Mirkan Aydın WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +13 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saturday Disney User:De 23:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC) keep The show passes , since it's a long-running network show with national broadcast scope, a small amount of cultural importance (a number of Australian TV hosts got their start on the show), and a cursory search reveals plenty of RS. The problem is that you'd never know any of this from the article itself! And the nominator is 100% right about the hair colour thing... ugh. Lots of work needed Deletion of Saturday Disney WP:TVSHOW Wikipedia:Notability 71 +14 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cole Pemberton User:Giants27 18:37, 15 August 2011 (UTC) delete Fails , , and Deletion of Cole Pemberton WP:ATH||WP:GNG||WP:NSPORT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +15 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Official Slasher Movies. User:Reyk 20:50, 9 June 2011 (UTC) delete """inherently |original research. The article seems to be advocating that there is such a thing as an """"official"""" slasher movie, and trying to convince people that certain movies ought to be included. Read the comments in parentheses sprinkled throughout the article and it'll be obvious that it's a lot of personal opinions""" Deletion of List of Official Slasher Movies. WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +16 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cody Lane (2nd nomination) User:PMDrive1061 16:14, 21 May 2011 (UTC) delete I recreated the article |assuming good faith from an established user. No need to release the hounds Deletion of Cody Lane (2nd nomination) WP:AGF Wikipedia:Assume good faith 53 +17 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skinner Creek User:Clarityfiend 20:13, 8 January 2020 (UTC) delete """or possibly '''redirect''' to List of rivers of Missouri and add it there as a tributary of Big Creek (assuming the map Google brings up is accurate). Per , no """" notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates"""" is available, so no standalone article is warranted""" Deletion of Skinner Creek WP:GEOLAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +18 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lin Liangming User:Fenix 12:10, 6 November 2015 (UTC) delete Fails |NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a |fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy |GNG Deletion of Lin Liangming WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +19 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Pilkington User:Mattythewhite 11:26, 30 January 2012 (UTC) keep Easily passes and . Appears to be a nomination Deletion of Kevin Pilkington WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:POINTY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +20 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical Mass (band) User:Crunk 03:10, 24 November 2006 (UTC) delete fails usic, and ''clearly'' fails Deletion of Critical Mass (band) WP:M||WP:COI Wikipedia:Mediation 70 +21 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinsey Wolanski User:Ceethekreator 23:28, 2 June 2019 (UTC) delete fails . Simply running across a field doesn't establish notability Deletion of Kinsey Wolanski WP:NMODEL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +22 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Sky Flag User:Quasihuman 16:54, 28 March 2011 (UTC) delete not notable, |Wikipedia is not for things made up one day Deletion of Big Sky Flag WP:ONEDAY Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +23 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ihar Dolbik User:Fosse8 10:29, 1 June 2016 (UTC) delete Lack of coverage in reliable third-party sources beyond routine reporting of results; nowhere near enough to establish individual notability per the GNG. Regarding the point on other similar articles, if those also have similar problems establishing notability and verifiability then they should be nominated too Deletion of Ihar Dolbik WP:OTHERSTUFF Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +24 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pirates at Ocean’s Edge User:Scottie_theNerd 08:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC) comment Articles on Wikipedia do not belong to a single author. It is not up to the creator of the article to provide all the sources and complete the entire article; that is the domain of the entire Wikipedia community. However, I would like to see sources that assert the series' |notability Deletion of Pirates at Ocean’s Edge WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +25 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now That's What I Call Music! 29 (U.S. series) 2nd nom User:Deor 03:38, 10 July 2008 (UTC) delete """All that I'm seeing on the """"official site"""" is """"'''NOW 29: November 4'''"""" with no further information. Can find no further substantive information. Fails at this time""" Deletion of Now That's What I Call Music! 29 (U.S. series) 2nd nom WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +26 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steep turn (aviation) User:Stalwart111 23:32, 4 December 2014 (UTC) keep per and . There are plenty of references, they just need to be added to the article. In furtherance of my vaguewave: http://books.google.com.au/books?id=owcCXZAVZ60C&pg=PA87&dq=steep+turn&hl=en&sa=X&ei=YO2AVLKlLcXbmgWfpIKIDg&ved=0CDMQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=steep%20turn&f=false, http://books.google.com.au/books?id=_4nGtx-_jHUC, http://books.google.com.au/books?id=RRcnAgAAQBAJ, http://flighttraining.aopa.org/students/maneuvers/skills/steepturns.html, and http://www.langleyflyingschool.com/Pages/Turns,%20Steep%20Turns,%20and%20Collision%20Avoidance%20Manoeuvering.html. That's from the first Google results page Deletion of Steep turn (aviation) WP:BEFORE||WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +27 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marysburgh vortex User:LuckyLouie 12:02, 3 September 2014 (UTC) comment Seems to be a legitimate legend with at least a couple of |objective sources showing some notability. I've removed all the cruft propagated by UFO/paranormal/sensational books/websites and original research (i.e. a detailed list of ships, the sinkings of many of them dubiously attributed to the so-called vortex) and stripped it down to a viable stub Deletion of Marysburgh vortex WP:FRIND Wikipedia:Fringe theories 44 +28 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RockON.me User:Rhododendrites 08:00, 14 January 2015 (UTC) delete Possible just but, for now, there are insufficient sources to meet . --&mdash Deletion of RockON.me WP:TOOSOON||WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +29 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott D. White (computer scientist) User:Kinu 16:10, 18 August 2006 (UTC) delete per due to lack of Deletion of Scott D. White (computer scientist) WP:BIO||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +30 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nirvanafanclub User:Zzuuzz 01:53, 26 October 2006 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Nirvanafanclub WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +31 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live At The NIGHT Volume 4 User:Esradekan 02:49, 4 April 2009 (UTC) delete fails notability per #Albums. No significant coverage in |reliable, third-party, sources Deletion of Live At The NIGHT Volume 4 WP:MUSIC||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +32 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Monday Night Football results (1990–2009) User:Prevan 15:06, 19 September 2016 (UTC) delete violates #STATS. We are not a statistics website Deletion of List of Monday Night Football results (1990–2009) WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +33 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Sobel User:AllyD 06:12, 23 September 2014 (UTC) delete Fails as a local councillor and candidate. The individual points in what amounts to a CV are not in themselves sufficient for biographical notability, nor is the local media coverage; fails Deletion of Alex Sobel :WP:POLITICIAN||:WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +34 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Lindsey League User:Spiderone 16:39, 17 September 2020 (UTC) delete clearly fails due to lack of reliable sources covering the subject in depth; this is clearly an amateur competition and none of the teams or players involved seem to meet the notability guidelines either Deletion of North Lindsey League WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +35 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Launcher System User:Sandstein 18:52, 14 October 2018 (UTC) delete Never mind the rocket science minutiae above, an article with zero sources in the actual article even after three weeks of AfD will realistically never get any and therefore needs to go per Deletion of Space Launcher System WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +36 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carmelo Bertolami User:Edison 16:00, 21 December 2007 (UTC) delete The claim of reaching 107 does not appear to satisfy and in general the requirements of and do not appear to be satisfied Deletion of Carmelo Bertolami WP:V||WP:BIO||WP:N Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +37 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hill Bill Show User:Ydam 11:01, 13 June 2006 (UTC) delete per failure of , even then notability would be questionable Deletion of The Hill Bill Show WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +38 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bent Leaf LLC User:Wiae 14:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC) delete Insufficient coverage in to meet Deletion of Bent Leaf LLC WP:RS||WP:CORP Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +39 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vacilando (2nd nomination) User:JohnCD 15:01, 5 October 2008 (UTC) delete Wikipedia is |not a dictionary, still less a Spanish dictionary Deletion of Vacilando (2nd nomination) WP:NAD Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +40 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benn Zarin McCord User:Wikicology 23:20, 20 September 2014 (UTC) delete per #G3. Article was deleted by {{u|INeverCry}} and {{u|CactusWriter}} per G3 in april and January 2013 respectively. Here is the https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=Benn+Zarin+McCord&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_patrol_log=1&hide_review_log=1&hide_thanks_log=1 deletion log Deletion of Benn Zarin McCord WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +41 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaina-e-Ghazal User:Stuartyeates 08:58, 11 October 2011 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Aaina-e-Ghazal WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +42 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peleg Chandler User:Coolabahapple 15:08, 18 May 2018 (UTC) comment """although nominator has withdrawn i would like to add my '''keep''' as """"batter up, this afd is knocked out of the park"""":), Peleg Chandler is eminently notable, not only does he meet , but also no. 2 in the area of US law, and - his book ''American Criminal Trials'' is one of those texts with numerous reviews (see external links section of the article that i have added""" Deletion of Peleg Chandler WP:POLITICIAN||WP:ANYBIO||WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +43 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Watson (politician) User:117Avenue 03:44, 26 April 2012 (UTC) delete unreferenced, Deletion of Ryan Watson (politician) WP:BLPPROD Wikipedia:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people 54 +44 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eamon McDonnell User:Dhartung 08:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC) delete Not sure about G2, but maybe G7? Regardless, fails , , and so forth. OT|Wikipedia is not for publishing homework assignments, and if your teacher assigned you to write a Wikipedia article that doesn't fit the project, please pass on that we would rather such things be done within the scope of |Wikipedia school projects. Thanks Deletion of Eamon McDonnell WP:V||WP:N||WP:NOT||WP:SUP Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +45 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Gruenwald User:LibStar 03:23, 6 September 2011 (UTC) delete as per and . take away this crime and he is not known for anything. simple Deletion of Peter Gruenwald WP:PERP||WP:ONEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +46 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deangelo Martin User:J04n 13:22, 20 September 2020 (UTC) delete No claims to notability outside of what they are accused of, clear violation of |BLPCRIME Deletion of Deangelo Martin WP:BLPCRIME Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +47 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Steckley User:Prosfilaes 04:49, 20 March 2009 (UTC) keep Per above keeps. Seems like he is the world expert in a small field. Gnews hits like- the http://www.thestar.com/printArticle/288382 Toronto Star article about him cited in the article, book review like http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-30526397_ITM go toward satisfying (answering Deletion of John Steckley WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +48 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 250 Most Important Albums of Latin Alternative User:Ohconfucius 03:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC) delete per nom. The |notability of Al Borde magazine has yet to be determined. OT#IINFO|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of info Deletion of The 250 Most Important Albums of Latin Alternative WP:N||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +49 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Valdes (actor) (2nd nomination) User:Victor 04:19, 6 January 2015 (UTC) keep There are some minor sources that we could add (http://www.accesshollywood.com/carlos-valdes-flash-characters-bubbly-personalities-affect-arrow_article_101396 this, http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/ustv/s246/the-flash/news/a616356/the-flashs-carlos-valdes-on-becoming-hero-vibe-its-up-in-the-air.html#~p0ySHYzm3iF47G this and http://www.thewrap.com/cw-flash-pilot-adds-broadway-actor-carlos-valdes-casting/ this, for example), but I guess this article is unlikely to grow beyond a stub in the near future, and the fact that we only find Flash-related sources could possibly make him a case of Deletion of Carlos Valdes (actor) (2nd nomination) WP:ONEEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +50 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PDFescape [[User talk:Feminist|(talk)]] 07:47, 1 May 2021 (UTC) keep Having reviewed three of Cunard's sources, they do not link to the PDFescape website via affiliate links, hence meeting . feminist Deletion of PDFescape WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +51 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Philippine network television schedule (2nd nomination) User:Howard_the_Duck 13:13, 11 April 2013 (UTC) delete """I'm not sure about the legitimacy of TV schedules here in general (see also Lists of United States network television schedules and Lists of Canadian network television schedules for more examples) but this one definitely fails . Not only is it unreferenced, being """"effective from 6 December 2010"""" means it only runs for less than 4 weeks in 2010""" Deletion of 2010 Philippine network television schedule (2nd nomination) WP:NOTTVGUIDE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +52 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of open source computer hardware suppliers User:Kvng 12:55, 16 May 2012 (UTC) keep no specific or compelling reason given for deletion. I don't see a point in that clearly applies to this Deletion of List of open source computer hardware suppliers WP:NOTDIR Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +53 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TWA media (non-commercial) User:AmericanAir88 13:30, 26 July 2019 (UTC) delete No convincing sources to pass . Not a deletion comment, but this non-notable article can also be confused with Trans-World Airlines (TWA Deletion of TWA media (non-commercial) WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +54 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Duke George Mikhailovich of Russia User:Plutonium27 17:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC) keep per Deletion of Grand Duke George Mikhailovich of Russia WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +55 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nature Camp User:SilkTork 17:15, 10 March 2010 (UTC) delete sources are local. No national coverage. Does not meet criteria in Deletion of Nature Camp WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +56 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X-Systems [[User talk:69.204.153.39|talk]]) 01:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC) comment The company would appear not to be notable, as stated, but the sources indicate that one or more of its products may well qualify for inclusion. As a process matter, I would ask that we avoid recommending speedy deletion (even though A7 does in fact provide for organizations) except in the gravest of circumstances where has failed us and the integrity of the encyclopedia is at stake. To my mind, this is more of a case of mis-stated notability. --Special:Contributions/69.204.153.39|69.204.153.39 Deletion of X-Systems WP:AGF Wikipedia:Assume good faith 53 +57 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilson Villa User:Adamant1 10:57, 4 October 2020 (UTC) delete """The article is about """"an Ecuadorian '''singer and composer'''."""" Therefore, it should pass and no where does it say a musician is notable for dying or getting coverage of their death. While it does have the exception that the person is notable if they """"Have been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself"""", but someone dying (or getting coverage for it) is the epitome of triviality. That said, a lot of the sources on his death are extremely trivial and/or primary anyway. Especially the Twitter mentions, but also other ones. So, as things currently stand there is nothing worth keeping the article over""" Deletion of Wilson Villa WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +58 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryn Davies (musician) User:JamesBurns 00:53, 11 December 2008 (UTC) delete notability not established, as per Deletion of Bryn Davies (musician) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +59 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional astronauts User:TenPoundHammer 16:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC) delete per #IINFO and #DIR. Who ''cares'' about fictional astronauts Deletion of List of fictional astronauts WP:NOT||WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +60 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/(I Do Not) Hook Up User:Esradekan 01:05, 23 January 2009 (UTC) delete as a non-plausible search term, fails notability per #Songs Deletion of (I Do Not) Hook Up WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +61 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of highest-grossing Indian films worldwide User:Hometech 13:48, 22 December 2012 (UTC) keep Waste of time. there are other cleanup tags in case u have douts on what is an Indian film exactly. All sources available otherwise. The lister mostly thought its but its not Deletion of List of highest-grossing Indian films worldwide WP:SYNTHESIS Wikipedia:No original research 12 +62 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of the Anti-Defamation League User:Cobaltbluetony 17:34, 15 June 2009 (UTC) keep In line with articles like Controversies regarding Jehovah's Witnesses, it makes sense to take a large amount of significant criticism to its own article, because it really does seem to be an unwieldy subtopic. Not too happy with the suggestion that the creator exhibited |bad faith through POV-forking. -  Deletion of Criticism of the Anti-Defamation League WP:AGF Wikipedia:Assume good faith 53 +63 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rammstein (album) User:B 05:43, 6 May 2008 (UTC) merge as non-charting demo albums don't reach the bar of Deletion of Rammstein (album) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +64 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beep Beep (band) User:Daniel 06:21, 18 August 2006 (UTC) delete It seems they don't quite meet the standards Deletion of Beep Beep (band) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +65 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic in Once Upon a Time User:Mangoe 17:55, 5 March 2018 (UTC) delete this painfully y Deletion of Magic in Once Upon a Time WP:FANCRUFT||WP:ESSAY Wikipedia:Fancruft 61 +66 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Naleski User:Ad 20:12, 28 October 2020 (UTC) delete A couple of / have been cited. The subject misses . As with most living, young people, I prefer draftification to deletion Deletion of James Naleski WP:RS||WP:IS||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +67 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asia Book of Records User:Bearian 15:31, 21 April 2020 (UTC) delete WP:MADEUP, or in the alternative, and Deletion of Asia Book of Records WP:MILL||WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill 32 +68 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Absition User:Petr 23:07, 7 January 2016 (UTC) delete Absition at least describes an application and according to the table below we have 3 articles on absement fulfilling criteria (although not many more such sources exist). The others (absity...) are just definitions without suggesting why such quantity should be considered Deletion of Absition WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +69 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algeria–Cyprus relations User:WilyD 12:36, 1 May 2009 (UTC) keep meets and exceeds the standard of . I see no argument why this is a highly unusual article that merits a highly irregular treatment. http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_multi=BBAB&d_place=BBAB&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0F99F9EF435A915A&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM + http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_multi=BBAB&d_place=BBAB&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0F97DCD6DE9A0CAB&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM + http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_multi=BBAB&d_place=BBAB&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0F97A7757B15EBDB&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM + http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-10602024_ITM + http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_multi=BBAB&d_place=BBAB&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0F979EE5409EB125&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM + http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-53246517.html + http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-10318738_ITM + http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-18301140.html + http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-24505662_ITM + http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_multi=BBAB&d_place=BBAB&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=1096EB4679DDD3E7&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM + http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_multi=BBAB&d_place=BBAB&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0F979EE3B9196990&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM + http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-78733874.html + http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_multi=BBAB&d_place=BBAB&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0F99F6695D3542E0&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM + http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_multi=BBAB&d_place=BBAB&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0F98E73199F7CC28&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM + http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_multi=BBAB&d_place=BBAB&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0F98E72D270A92AA&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM - one can of course dig up more, but this pretty clearly demonstrates that the article exceeds the standards of by an enormous margin Deletion of Algeria–Cyprus relations WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +70 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Frankl User:Maclean25 03:55, 7 April 2006 (UTC) delete per , just a lawyer Deletion of David Frankl WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +71 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Richest Man in Babylon User:Bakazaka 20:09, 23 March 2019 (UTC) keep In addition to the many sources ''about'' the book (passing #1), a targeted search of .edu sites finds that the book is the subject of instruction at many US universities (passing #4). It is notable, and as Britishfinance points out, there's no question that enough sourcing is available to support a standalone article. Remaining concerns can be addressed through editing, which does not require AfD intervention Deletion of The Richest Man in Babylon WP:NBOOK||WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +72 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hideki Shiohira User:Papaursa 17:18, 1 August 2010 (UTC) delete This is an unreferenced BLP and there is no indication that he meets any of the notability criteria at . His instuctors may be notable, but notability is not inherited. I found no independent sources that show notability Deletion of Hideki Shiohira WP:MANOTE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +73 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SuperKombat User:BusterD 13:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC) delete as promotional and . Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SuperKombat World Grand Prix I, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SuperKombat World Grand Prix II demonstrate that this page's creator was promoting, uploading a promotional poster of the second event and using it to illustrate the infobox on an event which hadn't yet occurred, hence promotion. User has since been blocked for running a sockfarm. Since this page also lacks sources which aren't routine sports event news, delete Deletion of SuperKombat WP:RECENTISM Wikipedia:Recentism 38 +74 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zach Varga User:Number 08:52, 18 April 2019 (UTC) delete Fails (the keep !votes made on this basis need to be discounted as the league has been removed from the list at following a discussion Deletion of Zach Varga WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +75 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Fox (lacrosse) User:Ben 22:17, 22 February 2013 (UTC) delete Player of Box Lacrosse and coach for amateur Lacrosse. Nothing found that could support Deletion of Chris Fox (lacrosse) WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +76 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Report of Van Fleet Mission to Far East User:Icewhiz 07:58, 29 November 2017 (UTC) delete While passing , this doesn't pass or . I don't think anything here needs to be merged with James Van Fleet Deletion of Report of Van Fleet Mission to Far East WP:V||WP:GNG||WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +77 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Southern Wood User:AllyD 05:47, 8 September 2020 (UTC) delete I added a short Birmingham Business Journal notice as a reference but I don't see that or anything else found in searches as sufficient to demonstrate |notability here Deletion of Great Southern Wood :WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +78 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eternity (game) User:Hbdragon88 05:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC) delete Megaburn, you are ignoring the parts about and . No media coverage, no third-party sources, only the site itself listed as a source. This does not meet any standard of notability. WP is not for crystal ballery Deletion of Eternity (game) WP:V||WP:RS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +79 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JIGC Group User:Schuym1 23:11, 13 December 2008 (UTC) delete Does not show notability per Deletion of JIGC Group WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +80 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fandom Talk User:Tychocat 09:17, 26 July 2006 (UTC) delete as original research, advertisement, and looks like a neologism. Fails for lacking multiple non-trivial articles by third-parties Deletion of Fandom Talk WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +81 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ill Tone User:onel5969 12:29, 15 January 2016 (UTC) delete Fails , and searches turned up nothing to show they pass Deletion of Ill Tone WP:NMUSIC||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +82 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dustin-Leigh Konzelman User:Geymarfan 02:37, 6 March 2018 (UTC) keep I am surprised at this deletion discussion. Coverage in CBS, Fox News. 10news.com etc. Should pass WP:SIGCOV Deletion of Dustin-Leigh Konzelman WP:ENTERTAINER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +83 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Illinois earthquake (3rd nomination) User:E 14:11, 2 October 2017 (UTC) merge with selective merge to Sandwich Fault Zone (consensus on 2nd AfD), partly as per - this this minor trembler was quite widely covered at the time. Plus, possibly because it does get pageviews https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=all-time&pages=2010_Illinois_earthquake, showing that it is a useful search term Deletion of 2010 Illinois earthquake (3rd nomination) WP:PRESERVE Wikipedia:Editing policy 24 +84 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo Financial User:Schazjmd 00:04, 17 April 2020 (UTC) delete All I can find is a flurry of press releases and interviews. Not |notable yet, maybe just Deletion of Neo Financial WP:NCORP||WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +85 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Irons User:MER 13:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC) delete fails , http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Christopher+Irons%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&lr=&start=0&sa=N check ghits Deletion of Christopher Irons WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +86 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. Johanna (Joana) Altmann User:Deli 13:11, 26 July 2019 (UTC) delete This article is blatantly promotional and entirely the work of single editor with a clear conflict of interest. I don't think it matters whether the subject meets Wikipedia's notability criteria because applies to this article. Just delete it and if she's notable, start again from scratch Deletion of K. Johanna (Joana) Altmann WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +87 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Brownell (2nd nomination) User:BRMo 22:51, 4 June 2008 (UTC) comment A question for those of you who are voting for keep. I'm actually ok with the idea that Brownell's game and the subsequent recognition deserve to be covered by Wikipedia. But why does it have to be in a separate biographical article? Regardless of the technicalities of , the spirit of it seems quite straightforward—if it's possible to merge coverage of a person who is temporarily newsworthy into another article rather than having a separate biography, it is preferable to do so. I've demonstrated that the material in this article can be merged into 2005 in baseball#May|2005 in baseball; if another location is preferable, that would be fine too. But it doesn't need to be a biography. Since BLP1E advises doing a merge and redirect, what's the objection to doing that Deletion of Katie Brownell (2nd nomination) WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +88 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardback User:ARUNEEK 09:40, 25 November 2016 (UTC) delete Fails .Relatively minor and trivial on-the-go coverage Deletion of Cardback WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +89 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The L. Ron Hubbard Series User:Asukite 02:29, 7 October 2013 (UTC) merge I was going to suggest a merge with the article for L. Ron Hubbard, but it appears Colliric suggested it, and decided to be |bold and just do it. I believe the page should be redirected now, unless anybody disagrees with the merge. {Special:Contributions/Asukite|C Deletion of The L. Ron Hubbard Series WP:bold Wikipedia:Be bold 78 +90 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Cardi B live performances User:Animalparty 03:56, 28 April 2018 (UTC) delete per and . We should not encourage more WP:fancruft|Fancruft. Several lists in :Category:Lists of concerts and performances might also be examined Deletion of List of Cardi B live performances WP:LISTN||WP:INDISCRIMINATE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +91 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davide Petrucci (2nd nomination) [[User_talk:ClubOranje|T]] 08:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC) delete per nom, fails notability criteria for footballers per and with no other claim to fame. No noticeable change to his notability status since previous AfD deletion.--ClubOranje Deletion of Davide Petrucci (2nd nomination) WP:ATHLETE||WP:FOOTYN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +92 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slow living User:Esquivalience 01:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC) comment I have |stubified the article Deletion of Slow living WP:STUBIFY Wikipedia:Stub 39 +93 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Plotz User:Corpx 09:20, 1 February 2008 (UTC) delete per lack of |significant coverage from |independent sources and I dont think the other stuff is enough for notability Deletion of Richard Plotz WP:NOTE||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +94 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of media markets and college football User:Wcquidditch 03:22, 7 July 2012 (UTC) delete we can't even use DMAs to begin with, and college team fanbases don't exactly correlate with market definitions anyhow. To say nothing of those schools with no football teams… and the lone reference is a DMA list that obviously has nothing to do with college football, which may as well put this list dangerously close to (if not outright in) |original research territory anyhow. Outside of the DMAs, little effort is made to connect this to college football on television… and even if you took all of ''those'' issues away, we're not |an indiscriminate collection of information. There seems to be more wrong with this list than not Deletion of List of media markets and college football WP:OR||WP:IINFO Wikipedia:No original research 12 +95 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GlanMer Media User:WikiDan61 13:38, 16 August 2012 (UTC) delete per #A7. This is basically a YouTube comedy troupe trying to pass themselves off as a valid film production company Deletion of GlanMer Media WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +96 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Perez User:Fenix 10:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC) delete Fails |NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a |fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy |GNG Deletion of Joshua Perez WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +97 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cindy Chandler (Lost) User:Isotope23 19:45, 1 May 2006 (UTC) delete I'd say redirect, but as far as I can tell the surname isn't Deletion of Cindy Chandler (Lost) WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +98 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsolak MLKE-Galstyan User:Netherzone 16:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC) delete I could not find enough to establish notability as per guidelines , or Deletion of Tsolak MLKE-Galstyan WP:ARTIST||WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:CREATIVE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +99 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rivers and Beacon-Hills of Gondor User:Piotrus 04:44, 20 April 2020 (UTC) delete Most of Tolkien works have been studied to death, but right now I am also not seeing enough to make this essay notable. No, not everything penned by a notable author is notable, requires 2+ reviews, or other indications of impact, and this is not shown currently (Tolkien Encyclopedia discusses it in a single paragraph: https://books.google.co.kr/books?id=by0dzzQ6m8sC&pg=PA159&dq=%22The+Rivers+and+Beacon-Hills+of+Gondor%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwioifH9mPboAhXFw4sBHf_MDGMQ6AEINjAC#v=onepage&q=%22The%20Rivers%20and%20Beacon-Hills%20of%20Gondor%22%20-wikipedia&f=false; I don't think that qualifies as in-depth treatment). The source cited by Hog Farm (https://www.elvish.org/Tengwestie/articles/Hostetter/sindll.phtml) would pass in-depth, but how reliable is https://www.elvish.org/Tengwestie/ Tengwestië The online journal of the Elvish Linguistic Fellowship? See also https://www.elvish.org//Elvish Linguistic Fellowship. I am afraid this may be not scholarly but just scholarly-like fan analysis. PS. Still, all things considered, I am leaning towards that source being in-depth and reliable. If anyone can show another source of similar or higher quality that is in-depth I'd be willing to change my vote to keep. But right now I am not seeing it, and one passable source is not enough in light of our policies Deletion of The Rivers and Beacon-Hills of Gondor WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +100 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/State Crimes Against Democracy User:E 01:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC) delete """as mere promotion of an neologism that has not caught on. By his own account, Lance deHaven-Smith coined the term in his 2006 article """"State Crimes Against Democracy."""" (DeHaven-Smith, Lance. """"When Political Crimes Are Inside Jobs: Detecting State Crimes against Democracy."""" Administrative Theory & Praxis 28, no. 3 (2006): 330-55. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25610803.) His coinage has had a decade to catch on, and it has gotten little traction despite the fact that the conspiracy theories deHaven-Smith peddles are very popular. Check out deHaven-Smith's website http://dehaven-smith.com/faq/default.html ''""""What are some examples of SCADs in recent U.S. history? : the assassinations of John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, and Martin Luther King; the attempted assassinations of George Wallace and Ronald Reagan; the election breakdowns in 2000 and 2004; the numerous defense failures on 9-11-2001; the anthrax mailings in October 2001""""'' There's more, but you get the drift. 9/11 conspiracy theory. JFK assassination conspiracy theory. Anthrax mailing conspiracy theory. Good grief. Original deHaven-Smits 2006 article defines a SCAD as :""""concerted actions or inactions by public officials that are intended to weaken or subvert popular control of their government."""" Note also that this page was started by an SPA in 2014, and has seen little in the way of expansion or incoming links in the years since. This seems to parallel the lack of resonance in the world at large, at least in my searches. The hits on the term in a books google search are a mix of conspiracy theory books, books about conspiracy theories, and a book by deHaven-Smith. If DeHaven-Smith's original article, or his book ''Conspiracy Theory in America'' were a Wikipedia article, we would delete it as mere , he piles one example after another with little to connect them, an dvirtually nothing in the way of evidence that these events were in fact conspiracies. ''Conspiracy Theory In America'' did garner a positive review on the website: Citizens for Truth About the Kennedy Assassination'' http://www.ctka.net/reviews/cta.html, but was ignored by the political press and scholarly world. Delete as per """ Deletion of State Crimes Against Democracy WP:COATRACK||WP:BROCHURE Wikipedia:Coatrack articles 47 +101 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moglix (2nd nomination) User:CNMall41 20:07, 5 July 2017 (UTC) keep Responding to a ping based on commenting at first AfD. My !vote remains the same here. There is in-depth coverage that meets such as https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/280920 this one in Entrepreneur (written by staff writer) and the ones analyzied by {{u|Cunard}} above Deletion of Moglix (2nd nomination) WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +102 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. J. C. Jooste High School (2nd nomination) User:onel5969 23:20, 14 December 2020 (UTC) delete non-notable school, fails Deletion of A. J. C. Jooste High School (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +103 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Walsh (designer) User:APerson 17:09, 6 March 2015 (UTC) keep Just from a Google search I found five sources (although two, the designboom and yatzer ones, might not be exactly |independent sources): the ''http://www.independent.ie/life/home-garden/the-wood-magician-furniture-designer-joseph-walsh-30666713.html Irish Independent'', ''http://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/homes-and-property/the-specialist-joseph-walsh-furniture-designer-1.1931809 The Irish Times'', http://yatzer.com/magnus-celestii-joseph-walsh yatzer, http://www.designboom.com/design/joseph-walsh-studio-magnus-celestii-07-04-2014/ designboom, and http://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/homes-and-property/cool-crafts-in-cork-joseph-walsh-and-the-art-of-making-1.2092380 another ''Irish Times'' article Deletion of Joseph Walsh (designer) WP:IS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +104 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amit Nagpal [[User talk:Begoon|Begoon]] 07:24, 7 December 2019 (UTC) delete despite the characteristic of this editor's creations, the subject does not appear to me to pass . Also very likely Deletion of Amit Nagpal WP:REFBOMBING||WP:GNG||WP:UPE Wikipedia:Citation overkill 8 +105 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1906 United Kingdom heat wave User:The 21:10, 30 August 2018 (UTC) delete per nomination. |A hot summer in Britain, indeed Deletion of 1906 United Kingdom heat wave WP:INDISCRIMINATE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +106 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Civilization (board game) User:Certes 11:50, 9 December 2018 (UTC) merge to Civilization (disambiguation)#Games per . This case is exactly analogous to the example there. We should also delete the anomalous redirect {{-r|Civilization (board game) (disambiguation)}} which was created automatically when {{u|Rodw}} fixed some bad links Deletion of Civilization (board game) WP:INCDAB Wikipedia:Disambiguation 64 +107 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William W. McCorkle Jr. NONE NONE comment and Thank you, Nappystar! Just trying to comply with the |Wikipedia guidelines, not feelings or delusions of power as implied. Will gladly change my vote, if you can prove that this individual meets the following criteria Deletion of William W. McCorkle Jr. WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +108 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Cheetham User:Claritas 13:40, 25 May 2010 (UTC) delete borderline fails - the relevant policy in this case. Replace with an article on James Cheetham, the biographer of Thomas Paine Deletion of James Cheetham WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +109 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Types of torture used in the Japanese occupation of Singapore User:Arskwad 18:32, 24 May 2010 (UTC) delete this is what might call an unencyclopedic cross-categorization... like fast food chains in 1950s England, or new york senators named dave... yeah you could source it... but it's better off covered as part of a bigger article... maybe Japanese war crimes or Japanese occupation of Singapore Deletion of Types of torture used in the Japanese occupation of Singapore WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +110 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troll Country User:Piotrus 01:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Troll Country WP:NFICTION Wikipedia:Notability 71 +111 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Presidents of the United States with facial hair (4th nomination) User:Gameinfirmary 03:40, 5 August 2018 (UTC) delete I don't see how this belongs on Wikipedia. It makes for good trivia but not really informative and doesn't appear to have much cultural impact on whether or not a president has a beard. Also as mentioned before |Consensus can change and it has been a few years since it was last reviewed Deletion of List of Presidents of the United States with facial hair (4th nomination) WP:CCC Wikipedia:Consensus 93 +112 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Earl Blackfoot User:MordeKyle 20:11, 2 February 2017 (UTC) delete This page is a violation of as the subject of the article has not been convicted of this crime. Also a violation of Deletion of Joseph Earl Blackfoot WP:BLPCRIME||WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +113 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GreySpark Partners User:AllyD 19:04, 23 March 2012 (UTC) delete No evidence of notability in the article (refs to company's own site, Linkedin, and a PR release about a previous company); there are a couple of slightly better refs available: http://www.hedgeweek.com/2010/02/24/36314/capital-markets-consultancy-greyspark-launched on their formation, http://www.ftseglobalmarkets.com/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=3102:greyspark-partners-opens-hong-kong-office&Itemid=161 on their opening another office but these are routine financial news items falling short of Deletion of GreySpark Partners :WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +114 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Pitt User:Cactus 20:10, 31 January 2006 (UTC) delete per nom. Very low unique Google hits, and seems to fail for living persons: (''Painters .... whose work is recognized as exceptional and likely to become a part of the enduring historical record of that field.'') Also, two of the external links provided appear to be to his own site Deletion of Andrew Pitt WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +115 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack and George User:Evb 14:07, 20 December 2007 (UTC) delete per |verifiability policy, , and |crystal ball Deletion of Jack and George WP:V||WP:COI||WP:NN||WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +116 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Harvest User:DHowell 03:08, 20 October 2007 (UTC) keep The |notability guideline requires significant coverage in multiple sources. I believe this applies even if no ''single'' source has significant coverage; if the coverage across the multiplicity of sources is significant, the subject is notable. Sure, each mention in the news articles or several http://books.google.com/books?client=firefox-a&um=1&q=%22Blue+Harvest%22+Jedi&btnG=Search+Books books by itself might not be significant enough to confer notability, but I do believe that the number of independent reliable sources mentioning this title (including the article's cited references) does amount to significant coverage in total. And yes, the fact that ''Family Guy'' named an episode after it ''does'' make this more notable, in that it increased media awareness of the name and thus increased the number of reliable sources available Deletion of Blue Harvest WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +117 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohsen Bouterfif User:Hammersoft 20:20, 19 January 2011 (UTC) delete Do we really need an article for every supposed copycat of Mohamed Bouazizi? Do self immolations get a free pass from concerns? This article, in its current form, contains exactly ONE sentence about this person. The rest of it refers to Bouazizi, the path of the Tunisian president and family, and other copycat incidents. There's nothing to work with here Deletion of Mohsen Bouterfif WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +118 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gemini Wars user:Hellknowz 19:52, 29 April 2012 (UTC) keep as passing per reliable, secondary, independent VG sources above. It is not released, but media has given it reasonable attention and coverage. Ditto above, as does not automatically apply to unreleased products, though it does loom over this one a bit. Granted, this is not a lot of coverage, and definitely not in-depth in all of sources, but it's decent coverage in more than few outlets. —   Deletion of Gemini Wars WP:GNG||WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +119 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnold Kwok User:DrStrauss 18:05, 10 March 2017 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Arnold Kwok WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +120 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven Kingdoms (band) User:JohnCD 23:00, 10 March 2009 (UTC) delete per nom. - fails Deletion of Seven Kingdoms (band) WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +121 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valley Entertainment Monthly User:Pdcook 01:48, 19 April 2010 (UTC) delete None of the sources referenced or linked in the article establish any measure of notability. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22Valley+Entertainment+Monthly%22+-wikipedia&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai= Google and http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&tbo=p&tbs=nws:1&q=%22Valley+Entertainment+Monthly%22&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai= GNews turn up pretty much nothing. Thus I can find no sources that demonstrate notability per Deletion of Valley Entertainment Monthly WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +122 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cordelia Naismith User:Rockphed 15:05, 16 October 2019 (UTC) delete and delete the whole slew too). This one at least pretends to have sources (most of the other Vorkosigan articles nominated for deletion didn't even have a reference section), but they are all either the books she appears in or things written by the author of said books. Alas, much as I love me some manic-dwarf-trainwreck-chess science fiction, I don't think society has noticed this awesomeness. I will happily change my mind if somebody finds some sources, but the only keep vote on any of them is, essentially an appeal to Deletion of Cordelia Naismith WP:OTHERSTUFF Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +123 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Ahmed2 User:Mike 07:48, 8 August 2006 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Syed Ahmed2 WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +124 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media Effects on Social Behavior User:Stuartyeates 09:14, 14 November 2011 (UTC) delete as Deletion of Media Effects on Social Behavior WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +125 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/720 Degrees Debian User:Pak21 12:16, 26 February 2007 (UTC) delete while the howto part has been removed, there is no sign of any mention of this software in |reliable sources as required by |verifiability Deletion of 720 Degrees Debian WP:RS||WP:V Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +126 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Dodge User:Mike 10:35, 30 July 2014 (UTC) keep per |GNG. GNG doesn't care whether the coverage was motivated by human interest; it only asks if there are reliable independent sources that are specifically about the subject of the article. I can't see any way that GNG is not met here. I have some sympathy with the suggestion that applies, but in this case I don't see a better outcome by applying it -- typically ONEEVENT leads to embedding the information in the sources in the article about the event. Information about Mark Dodge doesn't belong in the 9/11 articles, but given the sources, we should put information about him ''somewhere''. An article about him seems the most sensible choice Deletion of Mark Dodge WP:GNG||WP:ONEEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +127 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windows Police Pro User:RekishiEJ 18:13, 30 October 2009 (UTC) keep """Bleeping Computer has made this an independent article, and the article meets and three core content policies. I've just added a category by using HotCat to make the article more complete. By the way, they're more and more Wikipedians nominate articles for deletion since they regard them """"non-notable"""", but in fact have certain notability""" Deletion of Windows Police Pro WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +128 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Van (band) User:Champion 06:58, 8 August 2018 (UTC) keep Meets as a band that has charted. Note that is 1) not policy; and 2) not a reason for deletion Deletion of Van (band) WP:NMUSIC||WP:PERMASTUB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +129 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willie York (2nd nomination) User:Mztourist 04:20, 25 January 2021 (UTC) keep meets notability is based in SIGCOV in multiple RS, unless a specific guideline applies we don't assess the merits of the actions that led to that SIGCOV Deletion of Willie York (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +130 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greatest Hits 2 (album title TBA) User:Cliff 19:47, 31 July 2010 (UTC) delete per above: |title and track listing are unknown. This should be included in the artist's article until those are confirmed Deletion of Greatest Hits 2 (album title TBA) WP:NALBUMS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +131 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bandung Derby User:Mentoz86 07:55, 16 May 2013 (UTC) delete per . Sports rivalries are not notable unless they pass the Deletion of Bandung Derby WP:NRIVALRY||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +132 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Political activities of the Koch family User:Collect 23:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC) delete Not only SYNTH, but also a clear POVfork, since the material which is reasonable for individual articles is already in those articles, and this is a home for material which was barred from the other articles by WP policies and consensus. Jane Mayer's opinion piece is now covered in about ten articles - there is absolutely no need for this article on WP. Also note that charges of criminal activity can not be sourced to an opinion piece per . The only proper cource is therefore deletion and salting of this article Deletion of Political activities of the Koch family WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +133 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raise the Death User:Scientizzle 03:13, 25 June 2007 (UTC) delete or redirect to the band. There's no sources here, which fails . Just because the band is (ostensibly) notable, doesn't mean unsourced articles about individual albums with no secondary coverage. &mdash Deletion of Raise the Death WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +134 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of towns in Central Province, Sri Lanka NONE NONE comment I was thinking starting an AfD, not just this list but also for other provincial lists. I believe List of towns in Sabaragamuwa, and List of towns in Western Province, Sri Lanka meet |CSD A3 criteria. I found several issues are there common to all 9 provincial articles Deletion of List of towns in Central Province, Sri Lanka WP:A3 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +135 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forest Rangers Football Club (Australia) User:Thewinchester 12:21, 22 April 2007 (UTC) delete per nom. Article does meet , Deletion of Forest Rangers Football Club (Australia) WP:NOT||WP:ORG Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +136 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darkrai User:Randomran 01:37, 15 October 2008 (UTC) comment Discussion is certainly preferable to edit warring. |AfD is where Wikipedians discuss whether an article should be deleted, whether we support deletion, keeping, or anything in between. If someone reverts a redirect, soliciting discussion is exactly the right approach Deletion of Darkrai WP:AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +137 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molly Garnier User:E 21:03, 29 October 2018 (UTC) delete as . the page has very little, although there was an accolade in the 2003 Scotsman article for her work in the art school graduation show. lacks profiles and museum shows. The other thing I am seeing is some praise for her work on group and gallery shows the Eastern Daily Press, Norwich, so it's local Deletion of Molly Garnier WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +138 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chi iota kappa User:Nsk92 05:09, 13 September 2008 (UTC) delete per nom. No evidence of notability under either or Deletion of Chi iota kappa WP:N||WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +139 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hall Lyons [[User talk:180.172.239.231|talk]]) 06:41, 23 August 2014 (UTC) comment """The problem of the sources listed in the article should be explained, as you say ''""""nothing in this article supports notability.""""'' Otherwise the volume of the sources would get him past whatever he has actually done. Disclosure: I have no idea of the reliability of the sources.--Special:Contributions/180.172.239.231|180.172.239.231""" Deletion of Hall Lyons WP:BIO||WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +140 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of box office records set by Avengers: Infinity War User:Tutelary 04:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC) keep There List_of_box_office_records_set_by_Star_Wars:_The_Force_Awakens|have List_of_box_office_records_set_by_Deadpool|been List_of_box_office_records_set_by_Avatar|other Wikipedia articles for separating and elaborating on more records than is exhaustively possible on the main movie article. I will not solely rely on those articles as |other stuff exists, but to demonstrate that this is not a new phenomenon. Particularly after Avengers: Infinity War kept breaking records, https://screenrant.com/avengers-infinity-war-records/ the https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/avengers-infinity-war-box-office-a-rundown-records-broken-1106802 news https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2018/04/30/avengers-infinity-war-the-box-office-records-it-broke-in-its-641m-debut/#64f0fd4a2ff1 media https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/comic-riffs/wp/2018/05/07/avengers-infinity-war-just-topped-1-billion-in-record-time-whats-next/?utm_term=.98093000e62b certainly http://comicbook.com/marvel/2018/04/29/avengers-infinity-war-records/ took https://filmschoolrejects.com/avengers-infinity-war-box-office-records/ notice https://deadline.com/2018/04/avengers-infinity-war-weekend-box-office-opening-records-1202378032/ and https://www.gamespot.com/articles/avengers-infinity-war-busts-more-records-on-way-to/1100-6458662/ continued http://collider.com/avengers-infinity-war-box-office/ writing https://www.wsj.com/articles/avengers-infinity-war-sets-box-office-records-1525025846 articles https://www.rollingstone.com/movies/news/avengers-infinity-war-breaks-the-force-awakens-record-w519665 on https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2018/05/28/infinity-war-tops-last-jedi-and-avengers-at-u-s-box-office/#1f185bc52630 the https://variety.com/2018/film/news/avengers-infinity-war-box-office-1-billion-1202798746/ subject. Not every movie that is released has this type of coverage in numerous |reliable sources relating to the records that it has broken for its Box Office Debut. I argue that due to this consistent media coverage and the |general notability independent of the movie warrants this separate article. It is not in violation of as it was not intended for promotion, but to provide an encyclopedic explanation of the various box office records that Infinity War has broken. Nearly all of the records have solid sourcing behind them, are not published with Marvel's PR team, and instead written by volunteer editors seeking to |contribute to the encyclopedia. That is pretty much the opposite of . This type of article cannot be simply merged with the parent movie article as it has broken more records than is feasible to include in the parent article, and if forced to merge, would |tip the balance for content already on the movie article. I recommend that this article be kept for those reasons Deletion of List of box office records set by Avengers: Infinity War WP:OSE||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:PROMO||WP:HERE||WP:PROMO||WP:DUE Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +141 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mannoorkavu temple User:Stifle 14:09, 18 August 2008 (UTC) delete due to the lack of |citations from |reliable sources, which are required by the |verifiability policy Deletion of Mannoorkavu temple WP:CITE||WP:RS||WP:V Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +142 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denzil Connick user:Andrew 17:52, 14 February 2021 (UTC) keep WP:SOLDIER is an essay with no official standing or consensus support. The nomination's claim that the subject does not pass the is false Deletion of Denzil Connick WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +143 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of notable Jalpaigurians User:Eaolson 22:09, 28 July 2007 (UTC) delete """There's one blue link and six links total. Not a particularly useful list. Furthermore, the category is vaguley defined. """"Notability"""" is a judgement call at best. From : """"Lists should always include unambiguous statements of membership criteria based on definitions made by reputable sources""" Deletion of List of notable Jalpaigurians WP:LIST Wikipedia:Lists 36 +144 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheldon Siegel User:TonyTheTiger 02:27, 25 April 2019 (UTC) delete Not . Does not pass AUTHOR or Deletion of Sheldon Siegel WP:N||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +145 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Željko Loparić User:Xxanthippe 02:25, 24 July 2016 (UTC) keep Passes rof#C1 in the low-cited field of philosophy Deletion of Željko Loparić WP:P Wikipedia:Portal 50 +146 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arifs (gang) User:C 03:03, 26 January 2008 (UTC) delete The passing mention in a single article does not meet the requirement of |notability Deletion of Arifs (gang) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +147 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher R. Wight User:Richwales 06:11, 9 August 2011 (UTC) delete per , , , and Deletion of Christopher R. Wight WP:RS||WP:INDY||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +148 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virgin Mobile Australia User:NahalAhmed 18:32, 27 December 2019 (UTC) merge Virgin Mobile Australia to Virgin Mobile. it's Doesn't meet Deletion of Virgin Mobile Australia WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +149 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argentina–Singapore relations User:Piotrus 17:34, 2 February 2009 (UTC) keep or '''Merge''' to respective countries pages on foreign relations. I would like to see proof that those relations are non-notable, with in mind: even if nobody outside Argentina and Singapore cares about their foreign relations, they may be notable in light of works in language of those countries. Have respective deletion projects been notified? I don't see such notifications Deletion of Argentina–Singapore relations WP:BIAS Wikipedia:Systemic bias 83 +150 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yavuz Fatal User:Resurgent NONE delete as unsourced, and probably non-notable per . &mdash Deletion of Yavuz Fatal WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +151 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SDSS J140821.67+025733.2 User:Aldebarium 00:24, 5 July 2018 (UTC) delete object fails . The black hole mass estimate is almost certainly spurious, this is an oddball quasar with a weird spectrum and the usual methods to get rough estimates of black hole masses probably don't work well for an object like this. Note that Kozlowski did not even mention this object in the text of his paper. Presumably if the author had thought it was noteworthy to find a BH with mass 10 times bigger than any previously known from direct dynamical measurement, he would have mentioned that fact in the paper. Instead, this is probably just a case of an automated measurement and mass estimate going wrong and giving a spurious outlier result. As such, this doesn't really even belong in the list of largest known black holes. This is not a reliably measured mass and shouldn't be treated as though it was Deletion of SDSS J140821.67+025733.2 WP:NASTRO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +152 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jelly Jump User:Kirbanzo 15:58, 20 August 2018 (UTC) delete fails , no notable Ghits Deletion of Jelly Jump WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +153 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Mackenzie Davidson User:GPL93 12:46, 30 March 2019 (UTC) delete Fails . Best Deletion of William Mackenzie Davidson WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +154 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Wissot (2nd nomination) User:Nsk92 23:14, 7 December 2014 (UTC) delete A few brief mentions in the news, but certainly not enough to pass Deletion of Michael Wissot (2nd nomination) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +155 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Philippine Presidents by longevity User:Charlene 08:50, 23 April 2007 (UTC) comment Yes, I know, , but it does seem a failure of to have an identical article about US presidents and not about any other world leaders Deletion of List of Philippine Presidents by longevity WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS||WP:CSB Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +156 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fallout 3 walkthrough User:Haipa 01:22, 3 April 2009 (UTC) delete per MLauba and Deletion of Fallout 3 walkthrough WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +157 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cerro del Quinceo (2nd nomination) User:JeepdaySock 11:38, 11 March 2010 (UTC) delete """seems to fail , there are only trivial mention in references, and half of those refer to it as """"Pico de Quinceo"""", which brings in questions of do the references on the article support the article; are there two minor """"de Quinceos"""" or one with two differetnt names? The lack of response at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mexico go to support the complete lack of nobility for this hill""" Deletion of Cerro del Quinceo (2nd nomination) WP:N||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +158 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thanksgivukkah User:Reywas92 10:33, 14 October 2013 (UTC) delete """Another awful that has no long-term notability. References in do not make it a notable topic. You have got to be kidding me if you think a made-up portmanteau for a one-time coincidence is a """"singular cultural phenomenon"""", even if buzzfeed made a list about it. The has no short- or long-term impact, even if the hyperactive media has mentioned a meaningless coincidence. As Shinmawa pointed out, CRIT makes it clear that routine water cooler talk is not notable""" Deletion of Thanksgivukkah WP:NEOLOGISM||WP:NEWS||WP:EVENT||WP:EVENTCRIT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +159 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miller v. Campbell User:Philosopher 16:21, 11 November 2010 (UTC) merge Wikipedia is not a |crystal ball. We don't know if the court will make a significant decision or simply find some existing law to apply here. We don't know if this will become a Supreme Court case. We don't even know if any truly novel arguments will be advanced in the argument. Until one of these things (or something akin to them) happens, this is a and should be merged into the article about the election Deletion of Miller v. Campbell WP:CRYSTAL||WP:ONEEVENT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +160 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Listen Here! User:Totnesmartin 22:27, 6 August 2011 (UTC) delete I can't find much outside sales sites, and a passing mention on Ralph McTell's website doesn't really cut the mustard Deletion of Listen Here! WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +161 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Probability derivations for making low hands in Omaha hold 'em User:Coredesat 19:56, 24 June 2007 (UTC) delete blatant |original research. Alternatively, transwiki it to Wikiversity Deletion of Probability derivations for making low hands in Omaha hold 'em WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +162 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Becca Berg User:WikiDan61 12:36, 15 March 2012 (UTC) delete as a |hoax. This is apparently the fantasy land of the author Deletion of Becca Berg WP:HOAX Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes 40 +163 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vernes Selimović User:Mattythewhite 21:23, 26 June 2012 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Vernes Selimović WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +164 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of found art User:Vcessayist 00:48, 7 October 2012 (UTC) delete """as . Appreciate what the nominator is getting at. """"Found art"""" is something that appears in reliable sources, as per our article on Found object. But trying to determine what constitutes """"found"""", let alone what constitutes """"art"""", is very difficult and subjective in this particular area. We shouldn't put inclusion in this list to the whims of one or two reliable sources. There are literally hundreds and thousands of things that might fit here, or merely dozens, because the inclusion criteria is so impossibly vague""" Deletion of List of found art WP:INDISCRIMINATE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +165 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricky Holland User:Lankiveil 23:55, 11 April 2009 (UTC) delete tragic, but a classic case of Deletion of Ricky Holland WP:ONEEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +166 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dale Ogden User:CactusWriter 00:36, 9 October 2010 (UTC) keep Meets notability guidelines for ( is unnecessary). As one of only six candidates listed on the current ballot for Governor of California, he is going to qualify for some notability.http://yourcallradio.blogspot.com/2010/09/how-are-you-planning-to-cast-your-vote.html This hour-long interview on the NPR radio station KALW-FM adds to significant coverage. And there seems to be plenty of mentions on political discussion websites -- enough to ''presume'' more reliable sources. There currently is enough for the tiny bit of information that exists in the article. IMO, with only one month left before the election, this seems poor timing for a notability debate on this guy Deletion of Dale Ogden WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +167 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of places in South Park User:BeanoJosh 20:25, 9 November 2007 (UTC) delete per above. Fails Deletion of List of places in South Park WP:FICT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +168 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dangerous Dan User:GentlemanGhost 03:30, 29 March 2013 (UTC) delete No |reliable sources Deletion of Dangerous Dan WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +169 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odaine Démar User:Joaquin008 19:16, 28 May 2011 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Odaine Démar WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +170 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FS (logic) User:Gregbard 23:00, 28 July 2007 (UTC) comment All the reasons for deleting FS are all about the person who created the page, not the content. You guys have your corner wrapped up, I guess you don't have to work or play nice with anyone if you don't want to. As long as we can all see how it is (and everybody can), history will be the judge. I think making my point, and explaining it repeatedly with every bit of evidence that you guys do not understand the meaning of it, is probably what led to my frustration. I hope you guys are proud of your accomplishment. It isn't helping the quality of wikipedia AT ALL, just your egos. A vote like this brings into sharp relief Deletion of FS (logic) WP:FAIL Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +171 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My mhealth User:Skirts89 20:29, 11 January 2019 (UTC) comment As the nominator, I stand by my initial thought process - this fails and Deletion of My mhealth WP:GNG||WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +172 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/786 (number) User:Jacqui 03:54, 3 November 2005 (UTC) keep helps |counter systemic bias Deletion of 786 (number) WP:CSB Wikipedia:Systemic bias 83 +173 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calvin Cheng (2nd nomination) User:Jane 10:15, 11 December 2017 (UTC) keep Subject is notable in Singapore. Suggest raising the level of protection to permanently since a lot of those edit warring stuff by representatives of the subject through sock puppets can be avoided. Editors shouldn't be wasting unnecessary time dealing with COI users whose objective is at tonewalling and Deletion of Calvin Cheng (2nd nomination) WP:BLUELOCK||WP:S||WP:PROMO Wikipedia:Protection policy 0 +174 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ektron (3rd nomination) User:Ihcoyc 21:42, 13 February 2010 (UTC) delete """and '''salt'''. Gartner is an investment research business. Their editors are the customers who hire them to prepare reports. Being included in their """"magic quadrants"""" is insufficient for notability, that's just their version of a directory or """"top 100"""" style listing. This has been deleted several times before, and should have been |protected against re-creation. Book mentions all look trivial and incidental to me. The bottom line is that this is just another behind the scenes tech business that the general public does not interact with directly. A very persistent spammer""" Deletion of Ektron (3rd nomination) WP:SALT Wikipedia:Protection policy 0 +175 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dipankar Home User:Qwfp 16:19, 1 June 2010 (UTC) keep """Meets criterion 3: he has """"created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of … multiple independent periodical articles or reviews"""" as evidenced by http://www.dipankarhome.com/About%20me%20Details.html the press cuttings on his website that include full-length, positive reviews of his books in ''The Times Higher Education Supplement'', ''Physics Today'' and ''Foundations of Physics''. In addition, http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=Bf9&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&q=%22dipankar%20home%22%20%22riddles%20in%20your%20teacup%22%20review&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws Google finds reviews of both the hardback and paperback editions of his book ''Riddles in your Teacup - Fun with Everyday Scientific Puzzles'' in ''New Scientist'', although these aren't mentioned on his webpage (possibly they weren't so positive, but that's not relevant to the criterion). The fact that Forewards to his books have been written by Anthony Leggett, Roger Penrose and Paul Davies should surely count for something too. I did also check citations counts for his journal articles in Web of Science: it reckons his h-index is 13, with top 5 articles cited 95, 50, 43, 38, 33 times, which doesn't seem all that impressive in absolute terms, but I'm not sure how that compares to others working on theoretical foundations of physics. Should take into account that his papers only have two or three authors, fewer than typical in many areas of science and medicine""" Deletion of Dipankar Home WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +176 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Orange Lights User:Kurtis 18:24, 11 July 2016 (UTC) delete No assertion of notability whatsoever. I actually think this article would be a viable candidate for speedy deletion per |A7 Deletion of The Orange Lights WP:A7 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +177 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evan Carmichael User:Gidonb 02:52, 5 December 2017 (UTC) keep According to my research meets the Deletion of Evan Carmichael WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +178 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jón Pauli Olsen User:TheSpecialUser 07:17, 26 May 2012 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Jón Pauli Olsen WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +179 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films with surprise ending/plot twist User:Perfecto 14:56, 20 March 2006 (UTC) keep """The """"/plot twist"""" might be the problem. """"Surprise ending"""" is quite clear and definite - it will not be """"infinitely expandable"""". If you want a reliable source, well IMDB lists 34 of them.http://www.imdb.com/keyword/surprise-ending/ So it passes """ Deletion of List of films with surprise ending/plot twist WP:LIST Wikipedia:Lists 36 +180 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond E. Foster User:Grey 07:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC) delete Clearly promotional in tone and content. Unlikely to meet Deletion of Raymond E. Foster WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +181 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Left-Wing Fascism in India User:Soman 11:58, 20 February 2009 (UTC) comment oh the irony. I had posted a message (a generic template for CSD:G10) at {{user|Michonuri}}'s talk page. Now {{user|Minten}} uses the wording 'on my talk page', thereby admitting to |sock-puppetry. My personal guess is that not only Minten and Michonuri, but also {{user|Gabriel N}} are one and the same person Deletion of Left-Wing Fascism in India WP:SOCK Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry 80 +182 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Kleinman User:K 00:17, 28 December 2017 (UTC) delete nothing here suggests notability or significance; affiliation with a nn gaming company does not help. and fail per review of available sources Deletion of Andy Kleinman WP:TOOSOON||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +183 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thoughts in reverse User:Gongshow 18:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC) delete I'm finding zero significant coverage for this band in |reliable sources; does not meet or Deletion of Thoughts in reverse WP:RS||WP:N||WP:BAND Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +184 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Holmes (football player) NONE NONE comment VegaDark says that the standard is unreasonable, DarkAudit says that has not been met. Can you get together on this one, or do you want to maintain opposing points Deletion of John Holmes (football player) WP:ATHLETE||WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +185 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E.B. Hughes (2nd nomination) User:Erik 18:52, 20 July 2008 (UTC) delete per #G4; tagged accordingly Deletion of E.B. Hughes (2nd nomination) WP:SD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +186 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Cooke (cyclist) (2nd nomination) User:Lugnuts 10:05, 7 December 2014 (UTC) keep One ref does not equate to non-notable. Suggest the nominator withdraws this and reads Deletion of Matt Cooke (cyclist) (2nd nomination) WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +187 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shane Balkowitsch User:Finngall 17:08, 9 June 2016 (UTC) keep Coverage is mostly local but I think it's just enough to pass Deletion of Shane Balkowitsch WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +188 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top Hat Willy (2nd nomination) user:Hellknowz 10:00, 3 May 2019 (UTC) delete as a non-notable video game failing with no reliable independent in-depth sources, such as /RS. —   Deletion of Top Hat Willy (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:VG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +189 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Bollington User:Hmlarson 17:09, 31 July 2017 (UTC) comment I'm surprised the referencing is considered up to the standards of editors such as {{u|Fenix down}} and {{u|GiantSnowman}}. Looks like they need to be improved in order to meet Deletion of John Bollington WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +190 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ThreePeace User:Whpq 21:33, 14 July 2009 (UTC) delete There is no coverage in independent |reliable sources to establish |notability. None of the material identified as references in the article or noted in this discussiion establish notability Deletion of ThreePeace WP:RS||WP:N Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +191 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Blasey User:Dylanfromthenorth 08:17, 20 October 2010 (UTC) merge as per nom and Deletion of Scott Blasey WP:NBAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +192 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/So Happy I Could Die [[User talk:180.172.239.231|talk]]) 14:53, 2 August 2014 (UTC) comment """The logic of seems rather strange to me. says that a person who is """"part of the enduring historical record"""" will have been written about, in depth, independently in multiple history books on that field, by historians. If the same logic applies to , we will say that person who has been written about, in depth, independently in multiple history books is '''not notable at all''', since '''the only coverage of this person occurs in the context of history of that field'''. Clearly this is not what suggests. states significant coverage '''need not''' be the main topic of the source material. In my own view, whether the '''main topic is the album''' is not important, while the '''volume''' of sourcing is.--Special:Contributions/180.172.239.231|180.172.239.231""" Deletion of So Happy I Could Die WP:NSONG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +193 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zachary's Pizza User:Juliancolton 16:58, 22 July 2008 (UTC) delete violates Deletion of Zachary's Pizza WP:IINFO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +194 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tellows User:Kirbanzo 16:35, 3 September 2018 (UTC) delete seems to be a case of . Tagging as such in case an admin agrees Deletion of Tellows WP:G11 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +195 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daisy Watkins User:TTN 00:57, 28 October 2020 (UTC) delete No real world information from reliable sources to meet on any of them Deletion of Daisy Watkins WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +196 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saniyya Sidney User:Davey2010 00:21, 31 December 2016 (UTC) keep as meets |NACTOR #1 & #3 as well as GNG Deletion of Saniyya Sidney WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +197 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vytool User:FisherQueen 23:13, 19 March 2011 (UTC) delete I wasn't able to find any |reliable independent sources writing about this in any significant way Deletion of Vytool WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +198 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waterdeep User:Daranios 15:43, 1 December 2020 (UTC) keep or '''merge''': In a first search I did not see large-scale discussion, but a number of shorter bits about Waterdeep in secondary sources, both present in and as yet absent from the article. I would like to search more, but that takes time, especially given the number of deletion discussions going on at the moment. Taking these sources together, especially when considering that Undermountain redirects here, and therefore any discussion of Untermountain in secondary sources directly pertains to the notability of this article, I think the article can be kept. If all that together is not seen as enough, the present information should still be |preserved, both by merging (I guess to Faerûn), and by keeping the history available for future use and improvement Deletion of Waterdeep WP:PRESERVE Wikipedia:Editing policy 24 +199 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Carrion User:Alpateya 18:52, 17 March 2020 (UTC) delete Lacking strong Deletion of Victor Carrion WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +200 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Digital Gangster EP User:Stifle 23:53, 11 October 2008 (UTC) delete uncited and fails Deletion of The Digital Gangster EP WP:CBALL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +201 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denise Oliver User:2604 18:56, 2 April 2020 (UTC) comment Leaning redirect to List of Canadian voice actors#O as not all entries there are bluelinked, and roles indicate is likely satisfied; with ECP applied to prevent tendentious recreation. However, there seems to be some conjecture above that sources will eventually be found, in which case it can be converted to a userspace draft to work on until the sourcing is good enough to pass through the AFC process, and moved in over redirect. Pinging {{U|Dflaw4}} to see if there is any interest in hosting this in userspace Deletion of Denise Oliver WP:LSC Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists 51 +202 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimi no Naka de Odoritai User:Esradekan 12:28, 23 May 2008 (UTC) delete article fails to establish notability as per Deletion of Kimi no Naka de Odoritai WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +203 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/November 9th, 2010 Southern California Missile Launch User:Bahamut0013 15:52, 10 November 2010 (UTC) delete per nomination. Totally speculative and falls under . I'm not even convinced there was an incident beyond some confused citizens that saw a contrail, which conspiracy theorists picked up and ran as a missile Deletion of November 9th, 2010 Southern California Missile Launch WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +204 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donnie Darko: The Director's Cut NONE NONE keep Donnie Darko: The Director's Cut'' had its own international release, its own budget, its own theatrical release poster, its own screening at an international film festival. It has its own pages on https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/donnie_darko_the_directors_cut/ Rotten Tomatoes, http://www.metacritic.com/movie/donnie-darko-the-directors-cut Metacritic and http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=donniedarko04.htm Box Office Mojo, and two different home media releases (10 years apart). Its production and release were reported on by the likes of http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/life/movies/news/2005-02-14-dvd-donnie-darko_x.htm USA Today, https://www.theguardian.com/film/2004/jul/30/2 The Guardian, https://web.archive.org/web/20040806162303/http://www.indiewire.com/movies/movies_040722darko.html Indiewire, http://www.alternet.org/story/19627/the_resurrection_of_%27donnie_darko%27 AlterNet, and http://www.seattlepi.com/ae/movies/article/Donnie-Darko-gets-a-second-shot-in-theaters-1146161.php various http://www.sfgate.com/movies/article/Teen-sinister-rabbit-get-second-chance-2696394.php other http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17348-2004Aug19.html sources. Reviews at the time came from https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=SbAEim_dVQkC Roger Ebert, http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2004/08/24/donnie_darko_directors_cut_2004_review.shtml the BBC, https://web.archive.org/web/20040807060457/http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0429/lim2.php The Village Voice, plus others. In all of these sources, it's the director's cut that's the primary subject, ''not'' the original film. This all suggests to me that the director's cut is notable (independent of the original film), meets , and that therefore this article should be kept Deletion of Donnie Darko: The Director's Cut WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +205 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. J. Maddox User:BradBeattie 06:10, 27 October 2006 (UTC) delete as author fails . I tried looking the author up on google, but considering the number of pseudonyms used, I gather it'd be difficult to get an accurate number of GHits. Nevertheless, the article fails to assert notability Deletion of M. J. Maddox WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +206 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soccer Brain User:Doc 03:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC) delete WP:NEO|Neologism created by NN coach. Article is a mix of dicdef and |personal essay Deletion of Soccer Brain WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +207 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Chidozie User:Sir 03:50, 6 March 2011 (UTC) delete per nom. Nigerian football is not fully pro so he fails , and there isnufficient coverage to merit keeping this article under Deletion of Henry Chidozie WP:NSPORT||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +208 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amie Street (2nd) User:Howrealisreal 15:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC) keep Meets for press coverage. Site is sole focus of http://www.pe.com/entertainment/music/stories/PE_Fea_Ent_D_music.amiestreet.23f1f85.html article in ''The Press-Enterprise (California)|The Press-Enterprise'', and this http://online.wsj.com/google_login.html?url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB116077466937892327.html%3Fmod%3Dgooglenews_wsj article in ''The Wall Street Journal Deletion of Amie Street (2nd) WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +209 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carmen Perez User:Porqin 04:24, 1 May 2008 (UTC) delete The article claims to be written by the subject herself. Fails Deletion of Carmen Perez WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +210 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayor of Vinita Park, Missouri User:JayJasper 20:38, 24 January 2013 (UTC) merge to Vinita Park, Missouri per Nyttend. While the subject itself does not meet , it has obvious relevance to the target article Deletion of Mayor of Vinita Park, Missouri WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +211 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Singhal (banker) User:The 07:55, 20 August 2019 (UTC) delete per nomination on account of subject's lack of notability per criteria. All that one can find on the web, and indeed this is all that has been added since the AfD process started, were routine announcements of appointment and news about the banks rather than the person, who's at best name dropped (e.g. https://www.business-standard.com/article/finance/rbi-for-more-tier-i-capital-adequacy-than-basel-iii-norms-112030200035_1.html here; https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=7174&Mode=0 here; https://www.businesstoday.in/money/banking/rbi-reserve-bank-on-financial-inclusion-mission-kyc-jan-dhan/story/210886.html here; https://www.india.com/business/rbi-pushing-financial-inclusion-on-a-mission-mode-official-161101/ here; etc Deletion of Deepak Singhal (banker) WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +212 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sugunthan User:Dflaw4 13:49, 5 February 2020 (UTC) delete """A weak case might be made for , but all the sources I could find are passing mentions in International Business Times of India, which is generally considered unreliable, or in Silverscreen and """"IndiaBlitz"""", which I'm not familiar with. If anyone can find better sources or argue why the existing sources pass , I'll certainly consider updating my vote""" Deletion of Sugunthan WP:NACTOR||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +213 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Gay Scanlon User:Kirbanzo 20:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC) keep would close as non-admin but we need more !votes first. She's definitely notable though Deletion of Mary Gay Scanlon WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +214 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WTrak User:AllyD 09:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC) delete No |independent 3rd party evidence found of attained notability Deletion of WTrak :WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +215 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smooth Island (Ontario) User:AadaamS 09:38, 21 December 2014 (UTC) merge and '''Redirect''' to Ontario article. The island can be mentioned there, article only has to be verifiable, not notable Deletion of Smooth Island (Ontario) WP:V||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +216 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chenva tieu User:Yomangani 11:29, 28 September 2006 (UTC) delete he has the Ordre National du Mérite (lowest rank) which might make him notable, but doesn't say anything about awards, and the text is a straight lift from his blog so fails , and it is not in English Deletion of Chenva tieu WP:BIO||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +217 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Café Allegro User:Expertwikiguy 23:53, 17 August 2020 (UTC) keep Passes per . Seems like its got enough sources Deletion of Café Allegro WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +218 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darren Whittingham User:John 00:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Darren Whittingham WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +219 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odell Louis Dubree [[User talk:208.176.248.6|talk]]) Robert 13:50, 13 October 2009 (UTC) keep Does meet ; according to the Any Biography section in a person can be consider notable if that person has received a notable award or honor. I can think of no higher award than the Purple Heart. Furthermore, I am shocked that under it talks about being notable if you are a pornographic actor or a criminal but says nothing about veterans and especially those who received Purple Hearts. There is a difference between being notable and being famous. I think the should definitely be used for notability and not be confused with infamy. A Purple Heart recipient is definitely notable. They might not be famous to most people alive today, but they were famous in the small towns across America that they returned to after the War. I think more people would be interested in researching Purple Heart recipients and how they were wounded in battle rather than Porn Stars and their performances. There were approximately 200,000 http://www.purplehearts.net/id6.html Purple Hearts awarded during WWII compared to the 13,104,355 http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_Americans_fought_in_World_War_2 total number of soldiers that fought in WWII. With those numbers I would consider the Purple Heart medal very hard to obtain. I would like to make a larger plea to the Wikipedians out there to make Purple Heart recipients just as notable as porn stars and criminals. Special:Contributions/208.176.248.6|208.176.248.6 Deletion of Odell Louis Dubree WP:BIO||WP:BIO||WP:BIO||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +220 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of casinos User:Mr 04:47, 12 February 2009 (UTC) keep """Sigh. Absolutely not redundant to category casinos, from: ists#Purposes of lists: ''""""Redundancy between lists and categories is beneficial because they are synergistic, and is covered in the guideline Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates.""""'' Please, don't be a list hater""" Deletion of List of casinos WP:L Wikipedia:Lists 36 +221 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H.R. 3325 (117th Congress) NONE NONE keep Sourcing is not an issue; it had four non-primary sources at the time of nomination, and has six now. It's sufficiently distinct from 2021 United States Capitol attack that it deserves separate coverage; and in fact, merging it could likely lead to sacrificing worthy information on the alter of Deletion of H.R. 3325 (117th Congress) WP:UNDUE Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +222 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of educators and librarians of Upstate New York User:David 07:16, 17 August 2019 (UTC) delete per as hopelessly far from complete and hopelessly huge if ever completed. There are 13 people on the list now. Just including :Category:Cornell University faculty would give some 1175 upstate NY educators and the region includes many other fine universities and colleges with many other notable faculty members Deletion of List of educators and librarians of Upstate New York WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +223 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Z LaLa (2nd nomination) User:doomsdayer520 15:39, 2 February 2021 (UTC) delete """This is a close call because she has a charting single (https://www.billboard.com/music/z-lala) and some media notoriety in """"worst dressed"""" lists. She has some listings for modeling work, and gets noticed occasionally for her gimmick of singing in lots of different languages. Those are minor achievements that the article desperately over-interprets with terms like """"controversial"""" and """"pushing the boundaries"""", or implying that she is a social justice champion because she has LGBT fans. She is present in the media but not quite comprehensively enough for the requirements at and """ Deletion of Z LaLa (2nd nomination) WP:NSINGER||WP:NMODEL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +224 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne K. Block User:Ubelowme 02:24, 31 August 2012 (UTC) delete Neither version, the attack page or the whitewash, seem to contain sufficient |notability to meet the , mostly because the subject's notoriety is in an extremely limited geographic area. Deletion will solve the serious BLP and COI concerns Deletion of Anne K. Block WP:N||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +225 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fresno Nightcrawlers User:OnionRing 05:04, 26 June 2016 (UTC) delete per nomination, no significant coverage in , GBooks search only turns up Field & Stream articles about fishing in Fresno Deletion of The Fresno Nightcrawlers WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +226 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Ukrainian political crisis User:Ostap 02:38, 3 March 2008 (UTC) delete per nom. Its all Deletion of 2008 Ukrainian political crisis WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +227 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jared Blake User:GlenerationX 06:40, 24 June 2012 (UTC) keep """Criterion 9 states clearly """"Has won or placed in a major music competition."""" In Ten Pound Hammer's first statement he agrees that the artist """"Placed"""" in a TV show. Being one of the highest ranking shows on NBC would certainly classify The Voice as a major music competition. Has won or placed in a major music competition""" Deletion of Jared Blake WP:MUS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +228 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of locations in Camp Lazlo User:Noahcs 02:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC) keep I agree with you on the fact that this article is mostly trivial material, however some locations such as Camp Kidney and Acorn Flats are considered Wikipedia:FICT#Notable topics|notable enough for inclusion. I think we should either merge to Camp Lazlo or |clean up the article per Wikipedia:Lists, both of which I am willing to do Deletion of List of locations in Camp Lazlo WP:CLEAN Wikipedia:Cleanup 29 +229 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcello Serpa User:The 13:02, 10 February 2018 (UTC) keep I see many online (and added a few), for a highly notable ad exec winning top awards in his profession: these could easily have been found an AFD Deletion of Marcello Serpa WP:RS||WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +230 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RightsLogic User:WilyD 14:00, 15 August 2006 (UTC) delete with fire, . Add some Ketchup and you've got a sandwich Deletion of RightsLogic WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Spam 26 +231 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OrganicAthlete User:Bejnar 19:15, 30 January 2010 (UTC) delete Fails rg Deletion of OrganicAthlete WP:O Wikipedia:Orphan 48 +232 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James W. Sperman User:Pan 14:09, 12 June 2007 (UTC) comment No one recommending deletion has addressed the central question of whether Sperman's restaurant is |notable Deletion of James W. Sperman WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +233 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commune (documentary) User:Ichibani 02:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC) merge """to Black Bear Ranch. The article does not effectively assert notability except in the statement """"It's among the first of a group of films that reexamine and contest the negation of the ethos of the 1960's and 1970's"""". The Wikipedia:Notability (films)|proposed policy for film notability suggests notability is met if """"The film is widely distributed and has received full length reviews by two or more nationally known critics"""". Although two full length reviews seem to be available http://www.tvguide.com/movies/commune/review/282751http://movies2.nytimes.com/2006/11/03/movies/03comm.html, the film is not yet widely distributed. #CBALL|Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, so a merge with no prejudice against recreation if/when more reliable sources are available is indicated. ''Ichibani""" Deletion of Commune (documentary) WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +234 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas Spinning Hound User:Metropolitan90 13:57, 17 June 2008 (UTC) delete as |original research. Wikipedia is not the place to debut the description of a new dog breed. We are only supposed to include in this encyclopedia topics that have already been noted previously elsewhere. If this breed is formally recognized, or even if not formally recognized becomes discussed in the media, we may be able to include an article about it at that time Deletion of Texas Spinning Hound WP:NOR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +235 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Hurley (doctor) User:DerbyCountyinNZ 04:01, 19 August 2015 (UTC) delete No indication of notability. Yet another in the plethora of articles about St Peter's College old boys who clearly fail Deletion of Peter Hurley (doctor) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +236 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dakshana Foundation User:onel5969 16:33, 11 November 2015 (UTC) delete nothing but trivial mentions and press releases in the searches. Fails Deletion of The Dakshana Foundation WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +237 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saturday Night Fever (musical cast) User:Ryan 10:47, 6 August 2010 (UTC) delete per - this seems more appropriate for IMDB or similar Deletion of Saturday Night Fever (musical cast) WP:NOTDIR Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +238 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TCM - Time Critical Manufacturing User:MichaelQSchmidt 00:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC) delete as an |advertisement that fails |notability Deletion of TCM - Time Critical Manufacturing WP:ADVERT||WP:N Wikipedia:Advertising 35 +239 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Jo Cox User:Richhoncho 09:49, 17 June 2016 (UTC) merge This is a discussion regarding article namespace, not notability. Nobody is suggesting that the event should not be recorded in WP (a little trimming of the unnecessary will happen in due course, we are not expecting some international figure to say it's a good job she's dead, are we?) If later the murder becomes notable for some reason (i.e. subsequent events outside the scope of the individual), or because of , then it can be split out again. Let's be honest, anybody who wants to read about the murder will also want/need details of poor Jo too, there is no logic to separation Deletion of Murder of Jo Cox WP:SIZE Wikipedia:Article size 3 +240 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tubes (Filesharing) User:Trebor 20:53, 16 January 2007 (UTC) delete no independent sources. If it's only in beta, it might be |crystalballery too Deletion of Tubes (Filesharing) WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +241 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Statik G User:Lemongirl942 08:37, 27 November 2016 (UTC) delete This seems to be a bit . At the moment there are not enough coverage in reliable sources to satisfy or . No objection to a recreation should more sources be found in the future Deletion of Statik G WP:TOOSOON||WP:GNG||WP:NMUSIC Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +242 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iron fist fighting User:Mtking 20:37, 21 October 2012 (UTC) delete No indication that this meets I cant find the significant coverage in RS's Deletion of Iron fist fighting WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +243 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annette Groves User:A 19:53, 4 August 2010 (UTC) comment for Freshacconci -- when you get the chance, please check out the 2 external links I provided above as well as the material in section 3 of . Thanks Deletion of Annette Groves WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +244 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IT New York User:Blue 04:31, 20 December 2013 (UTC) delete for failing and lack of independent sources Deletion of IT New York WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +245 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Crabnet User:Brewcrewer 03:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC) delete per Deletion of The Crabnet WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +246 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Senate bill 0099 User:Gnfnrf NONE delete Classic article. All of the pertinent information can (and has) go into the articles about what this article is actually about, the 2008 US Presidential campaign. — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Deletion of Senate bill 0099 WP:COATRACK Wikipedia:Coatrack articles 47 +247 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devamrita Swami (2nd nomination) User:L3X1 19:25, 30 November 2017 (UTC) delete Some mentions, but fails |NMonk Deletion of Devamrita Swami (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +248 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magnesium oil User:Northamerica1000 19:54, 10 January 2015 (UTC) keep Passes . Source examples include https://books.google.com/books?id=w5LNq9JIiScC&pg=PA152&dq=%22Magnesium+oil%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=RYGxVMGoBs25oQSNx4HIDg&ved=0CD4Q6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=%22Magnesium%20oil%22&f=false, https://books.google.com/books?id=aqMPZM9gk_0C&pg=PT289&dq=%22Magnesium+oil%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=RYGxVMGoBs25oQSNx4HIDg&ved=0CEkQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=%22Magnesium%20oil%22&f=false, https://books.google.com/books?id=p0KriJuFl1IC&pg=PA269&dq=%22Magnesium+oil%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=RYGxVMGoBs25oQSNx4HIDg&ved=0CDgQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22Magnesium%20oil%22&f=false, https://books.google.com/books?id=bXUIBgAAQBAJ&pg=PT435&dq=%22Magnesium+oil%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=uIGxVMa1Lor6oQTO5YK4Bg&ved=0CFwQ6AEwCTgK#v=onepage&q=%22Magnesium%20oil%22&f=false, https://books.google.com/books?id=aqMPZM9gk_0C&pg=PT289 (partial preview). Furthermore, https://books.google.com/books?id=VrZBxNPnmZoC&pg=PA49&dq=%22Magnesium+oil%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=-YGxVKrREYW1ogTw54LACg&ved=0CEAQ6AEwAzgU#v=onepage&q=%22Magnesium%20oil%22&f=false this source states that Magnesium oil is another name for Transdermal Magnesium. Source examples for Transdermal Magnesium include https://books.google.com/books?id=p0KriJuFl1IC&printsec=frontcover, https://books.google.com/books?id=3uEuBAAAQBAJ, http://naturalmedicine.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1840:transdermal-magnesium&catid=913:natural-remedies Deletion of Magnesium oil WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +249 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SSPX-affiliated religious orders User:Firefoxman 21:11, 6 March 2007 (UTC) delete per Deletion of SSPX-affiliated religious orders WP:VERIFY Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +250 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red this ever user:DakotaKahn 07:12, 24 March 2006 (UTC) delete This is reposted content 3 times speedy deleted. Does not meet Deletion of Red this ever WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +251 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arbella Ewing User:David 15:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC) delete """There's nothing encyclopedic here.The lede has more information about other people than it does about the subject. It's all about where the subject stood in relation to other especially long-lived people in a mythical competition to breathe longer.The body is similarly bereft of anything that belongs in an encyclopedia. Her family considered her a gem and attributed her longevity to positive thinking. Her parents were from Mississippi. She broke her hip at one of her last birthday parties and wound up in a nursing home. She lived, worked, married, had a child and died. Far from """"an exceptionally strong claim of notability"""", there's barely any at all.|Notability requires |significant coverage in multiple, independent |reliable sources. What we have here is profoundly insignificant coverage, and all for the non-inherently notable attribute of deferring the visit of the Grim Reaper a bit longer than most. Birthday greetings and an obit, plus a mention on a GRG table of old people who died in 2008 just doesn't cut it.Arguing in the alternative, if others think this null set of a subject does scrape by our |general notability guideline, (although how, I cannot imagine) then OPAGE counsels that a list and not a stand-alone article is the proper resolution here""" Deletion of Arbella Ewing WP:N||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:NOPAGE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +252 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takuro Ueno User:Joe 20:27, 7 April 2011 (UTC) delete unless more reliable sources can be found. Unfortunately, the Marquis WW's aren't considered reliable (see, for example, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_53#Is_Who.27s_Who_a_reliable_source.3F), and I'm unable to find significant |secondary coverage of this consultant under this name or 上野拓朗, you'd think there'd be a news article or book that gives some in-depth coverage of him somewhere. AEA membership is not a criteria for notability, nor is being a teacher (see WP:PROF for guidance on that), but more important than questions of notability are the questions of verifiability. At present, we have no verifiable reliable sources that I can see, and WP:BLP and WP:V leave little room for any result but delete in such a case Deletion of Takuro Ueno WP:SECONDARY Wikipedia:No original research 12 +253 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Power (actor) User:Iowateen 02:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC) delete Non-notable |actor Deletion of Sean Power (actor) WP:ENTERTAINER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +254 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bart Caubergh User:GiantSnowman 09:33, 24 December 2012 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Bart Caubergh WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +255 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pepperpot (Monty Python) User:Schizombie 00:09, 27 December 2009 (UTC) delete That an article hasn't improved much in X years or referenced after being tagged for X years is not evidence it couldn't, but even as a Python fan I have to agree there's not much could say about these characters, for a general encyclopedia anyway. http://books.google.com/books?q=%2Bpepperpot%20%2B%22monty%20python%22&hl=en&sa=N&tab=sp Google Books (including a ''Monty Python Encyclopedia'') and http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%2Bpepperpot+%2B%22monty+python%22&hl=en&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2001&as_sdtp=on Google Scholar if anyone wants to look for substantial coverage. It's been mirrored by the Monty Python Wiki, so they have it if they want it. I guess it could be merged to List of recurring characters in Monty Python's Flying Circus or a ''Glossary of Monty Python'' could be created following but I am not inclined to create one myself Deletion of Pepperpot (Monty Python) WP:RS||WP:WPGLOSSARY Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +256 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taxpayers’ Choice Debt Reduction Act [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']] 04:41, 24 February 2013 (UTC) delete """as with the other related AFDs, the standard to be applied is and in this case I don't think the subject passes. I couldn't find a single """"news"""" items on the subject, just legislative registries (routine), a couple of blogs (non-|RS) and WP mirrors""" Deletion of Taxpayers’ Choice Debt Reduction Act WP:GNG||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +257 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David J. Simms User:David 01:12, 24 December 2009 (UTC) comment The Irish Times story linked from our article is about his wife, so it doesn't help. I did find http://www.independent.ie/national-news/academic-caught-up-in-factory-planning-dispute-76218.html another newspaper story about him, but it doesn't say anything about his academic notability (it's about his objection to a plan to build a factory near his holiday home) and would be a pretty slim basis on which to build a case for Deletion of David J. Simms WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +258 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Teal User:Mendaliv 09:01, 16 June 2008 (UTC) keep """Passes : """"Competitors who have competed in a fully professional league..."""" He played in the NHL. Sadly that's it""" Deletion of Jeff Teal WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +259 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Finney NONE NONE keep Passes criteria #2 Deletion of Jan Finney WP:NMMA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +260 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProcessEdge User:Davey2010 22:47, 9 September 2014 (UTC) delete Seems somewhat promo, Anyway can't find any evidence of any |Notability Deletion of ProcessEdge WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +261 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KDE Light User:Siva1979 04:02, 31 July 2007 (UTC) delete The lack of |reliable sources for this article is a major concern here. Moerover, it is quite difficult to |verify the contents of this article from third-party sources. --|S Deletion of KDE Light WP:RS||WP:V||WP:EA Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +262 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocker Panel Productions User:Coredesat 02:50, 27 June 2006 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Rocker Panel Productions WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +263 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transformers 3 User:Chaser2 15:13, 27 October 2009 (UTC) delete fails . This seems to be just a copy-paste out of the Transformers 2 article Deletion of Transformers 3 WP:NFF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +264 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schuyler Hayden User:SportingFlyer 02:05, 20 March 2018 (UTC) comment """I'd still like to see a keep argument that's based on notability and not an extension of , as none of the keep votes have provided sources. Rat Fink does not have an article on this site. A Google Search shows the film is registered on imdb and a number of film directory sites. A book search shows his name appears in some books which talk primarily about Riot on the Sunset Strip, and a couple others talked about Rat Fink as well, saying it could """"do the art theater rounds well if handled correctly,"""" not exactly a good endorsement. Hayden's name appears in similar directories. I don't see significant coverage at all""" Deletion of Schuyler Hayden WP:ILIKEIT Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +265 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people speculated to have been syphilitic (2nd nomination) User:SkierRMH 09:19, 13 January 2007 (UTC) delete Speculated!!, by whom? The only way this list could be populated is by speculation, , , and violations Deletion of List of people speculated to have been syphilitic (2nd nomination) WP:POV||WP:OR||WP:V Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +266 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudra soni User:Piotrus 13:00, 6 December 2016 (UTC) delete Minor coverage, no main roles (IMDb has a single entry). to be in an encyclopedia Deletion of Rudra soni WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +267 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuwaiti Arab User:Colonel 20:58, 19 May 2012 (UTC) keep The people of Kuwait are obviously notable and we have other articles about them such as demographics of Kuwait and Kuwaiti Arabic. Per our |editing policy, we should use ordinary editing to improve our coverage of this topic Deletion of Kuwaiti Arab WP:PRESERVE Wikipedia:Editing policy 24 +268 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attack on Kennedy Road [[User talk:192.160.216.52|talk]]) 13:46, 9 April 2018 (UTC) keep Be serious. The sources already in the article are far, far more than sufficient to meet . Nom's theories on why, despite meeting GNG, this subject is not notable, are interesting, but they're not AfD-worthy reasoning. Special:Contributions/192.160.216.52|192.160.216.52 Deletion of Attack on Kennedy Road WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +269 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Praise and veneration of Muhammad User:FreeatlastChitchat 05:53, 27 December 2015 (UTC) keep """A very hilarious reason for deleting has been provided which should be included in and reasons for not nominating an article. I literally looked twice to make sure I was reading it right. The thing that is so wrong with this article is that it """"Looks like a overtly positive article"""", yes gentlemen, we should delete an article about veneration because it discusses veneration. and Even if the article is titled """"Praise and veneration of XXXXXXX"""" it should '''not''' include positive views? Can someone just shoot me already. Another concern seems to be that the article has and issues,,,,,,,,,,,and should therefore be '''DELETED''' instead of being improved. I hang my head in shame at this view and would like to say that articles with these issues are to be improved instead of deleted. The topic """"Praise and veneration of Muhammad"""" is encyclopedic in nature and has quite a lot of encyclopedic value and therefore it makes sense. Can the article be improved? YES. Should the article be just wiped off the face of wiki just because there is room for improvement there? '''NO''', and I do hope we do not set a precedent here. Appears to be a classic case of from the nom as he thinks that only topics critical of the subject are allowed""" Deletion of Praise and veneration of Muhammad WP:BULLSHIT||WP:PRIMARY||WP:QUOTE||WP:IDONTLIKEIT Wikipedia:Complete bollocks 62 +270 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales Foundation User:Vinodbasker 16:15, 8 October 2018 (UTC) keep This foundation has got attention from reliable independent sources and thus satisfies Deletion of Jimmy Wales Foundation WP:ORGIN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +271 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aircrafts currently in production User:PennySpender1983 02:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC) delete per the policy that |wikipedia is not a directory of everything that exists or has existed. This data is better suited split and placed into the articles about each company. It is more likely to be maintained there Deletion of Aircrafts currently in production WP:NOTDIRECTORY Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +272 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alodia Gosiengfiao (3rd nomination) [[User talk:159.182.1.4|talk]]) 12:50, 12 October 2009 (UTC) keep per , last AfD was less than one month ago. Special:Contributions/159.182.1.4|159.182.1.4 Deletion of Alodia Gosiengfiao (3rd nomination) WP:NOTAGAIN Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +273 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanlie James User:K 03:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) keep as . The three books listed are widely held, with the top books in 700+ libraries: https://www.worldcat.org/identities/lccn-no92011969/ Worldcat Identities. The article is sufficiently well sourced at the moment and establishes stand-alone notability Deletion of Stanlie James WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +274 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lukewarmer User:Sailsbystars 16:57, 19 March 2014 (UTC) delete this for the same reasons I gave for deleting Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming (6th nomination). It has too many possible definitions. Add in eologism and that weighs even more heavily towards deletion Deletion of Lukewarmer WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +275 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 77 User:Mkativerata 03:44, 30 March 2010 (UTC) delete but '''weak on 66'''. Essentially per BrownHairedGirl. I'm gobsmacked at the sources put forward by Eastmain. How anyone on earth could consider them reliable is beyond me. |GNG is an important guideline and shouldn't discarded lightly. It is important for good reason. Without significant coverage in reliable sources, it is usually impossible to have an encyclopaedic article about a subject that is properly verified. These bus route articles are a case in point: they are littered with original research and for all we know could be totally inaccurate. The reason they are littered with original research is because the reliable sources aren't there. For that reason, the original research is fatal and unsalvageable Deletion of London Buses route 77 WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +276 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Cammarano User:Deathlibrarian 12:21, 20 May 2017 (UTC) delete As above, it appears to fail Deletion of Roy Cammarano WP:NAUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +277 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autocunnilingus (2 nomination) User:Dhartung 08:47, 3 November 2006 (UTC) delete """as . http://www.selfellatio.com/interview.htm According to this guy, who ought to know, ''I have been searching for a long time for proof of that. I belong to a couple of groups on the internet who are also searching for it. We as a collective have yet to find any proof. I am positive that it can be done because if I were a woman I could reach. But yet there aren't any photographs out there other than some altered ones.'' I performed life-saving surgery on donkey punch but this has less cultural currency even though it's probably more """"popular"""" in pornographic terms""" Deletion of Autocunnilingus (2 nomination) WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +278 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Yager User:Jakejr 21:23, 23 December 2012 (UTC) delete I don't see how people keep saying he meets when he has one fight for a top tier organization and is currently competing for a minor promotion. As I said at an earlier AfD discussion--exhibition fights don't count, just like the sparring partner of a champion boxer can't claim he fought for that boxer's title Deletion of Jamie Yager WP:NMMA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +279 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Scholar Athlete Academy by Ben Summers User:Bagumba 18:30, 28 March 2011 (UTC) delete Article fails to meet primary criteria for notability of companies of significant coverage by independent sources (#Primary_criteria). Article's source consists only of company's own press release with an external link to company's website. Searching the web, I only find the same company press release Deletion of The Scholar Athlete Academy by Ben Summers WP:COMPANY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +280 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nichapat Suphap User:Sarahj2107 14:28, 19 October 2016 (UTC) delete Doesn't meet . I can't find any coverage in reliable sources. The two references currently in the article are not independent Deletion of Nichapat Suphap WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +281 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Snitker User:Awyllie 22:38, 13 April 2010 (UTC) comment There is no distinction for seperate notability outside of a political campaign in , only that the sources are reliable and independent of the candidate Deletion of Alexander Snitker WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +282 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Binary Report User:Bobet 02:56, 21 December 2005 (UTC) keep based on reading the first paragraph until its very end. Getting mainstream media attention (which google seems to verify and it's mentioned in the Katelyn Faber article here too) qualifies it per Deletion of Binary Report WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +283 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frazer Brown User:Mendaliv 12:13, 1 December 2008 (UTC) delete I'm not seeing anything to indicate this person passes or . &mdash Deletion of Frazer Brown WP:CREATIVE||WP:ENTERTAINER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +284 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New York Mets minor league players User:Ejgreen77 03:20, 6 November 2014 (UTC) keep on a y nomination Deletion of New York Mets minor league players WP:POINT Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +285 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nels J. Smith User:WilliamThweatt 08:32, 28 November 2015 (UTC) keep satisfies (1) of . Due to the era, online sources may be few, but having served 16 years as a state legislator, he's bound to be notable. The article has possibilities, it's just a matter of scrounging up some (most likely offline) sources Deletion of Nels J. Smith WP:POLITICIANS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +286 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vague relationship User:Nwlaw63 23:54, 2 February 2011 (UTC) delete If this is an encyclopedia article then I'm a lamppost. It's an essay with no sources - at its most trivial Deletion of Vague relationship WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +287 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Bobby User:Bettia 09:52, 2 June 2011 (UTC) delete as unverifiable. He was certainly in Bechem Chelsea's squad for 2008-09http://www.worldfootball.net/teams/bechem-chelsea/2009/2/ but like everyone else here I can't find evidence he's actually played at a fully professional level. The others leagues he's played in aren't fully professional, and there's no evidence he passes the |general notability guideline Deletion of Prince Bobby WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +288 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rashida Richardson User:Beccaynr 01:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC) keep """I have added sources from ''NBC News'', ''CBS News'', and ''Reuters'' that quote Richardson as an expert, and added a recent co-authored opinion article by Richardson in ''The Hill''. While the article still needs work, I have tried to update it to make the basis of her notability more clear, and I think the coverage she has recieved at minimum appears to meet , i.e. """"If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability""" Deletion of Rashida Richardson WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +289 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casino Tropez User:2005 09:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC) merge """While the above is not accurate (the article establishes notoriety via the eGaming Review reference), and its pure nonsense to say the search brings up nothing but """"gambling spam"""", since the company is privately held and does not have the more significant notoriety of, for example, Golden Palace, it doesn't meet or with any certainty. It isn't that far away though, so I would redirect it to Playtech until such time as the company plainly meets or """ Deletion of Casino Tropez WP:CORP||WP:WEB||WP:CORP||WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +290 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill-Lyn Euto NONE NONE delete per and Deletion of Jill-Lyn Euto WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:VICTIM Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +291 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Video DownloadHelper User:Philg88 09:16, 23 May 2014 (UTC) keep Easily passes the |notability threshold with widespread coverage in |reliable sources Deletion of Video DownloadHelper WP:GNG||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +292 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BSA Twin Tower User:Mendaliv 07:43, 24 June 2008 (UTC) merge to St. Francis Square; there is |notability in |reliable sources under that name (via Google News Deletion of BSA Twin Tower WP:N||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +293 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Himo User:Faizal 14:11, 3 December 2020 (UTC) delete Sources don't demonstrate notability. Fails and Deletion of Himo WP:GNG||WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +294 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yung Miraboi Mark (2nd nomination) User:Hyttgf975 00:01, 6 September 2019 (UTC) keep Almost all subject reference are from reliable source such as Vanguard (Nigeria), The Punch, The Sun (Nigeria), Daily Times (Nigeria), The Daily Independent (Lagos newspaper) many but few to mention from my point of view independent of the subject but not mere mentions which passes also considered in otability_(people)#Entertainers|WP:ENT much but might not know in other hands from my point stated article has to be keep thanks Deletion of Yung Miraboi Mark (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +295 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghanada User:Cewbot 00:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC) comment While this discussion appears to have |no quorum, it is '''NOT eligible for |soft deletion''' because it has been {{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:Ghanada}}}} previously PROD'd Deletion of Ghanada WP:NOQUORUM||WP:SOFTDELETE Wikipedia:Deletion process 72 +296 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commander Kyle User:danntm 14:22, 26 January 2007 (UTC) delete or '''Merge''' per Deletion of Commander Kyle WP:FICT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +297 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epik (domain registrar) User:Dibbydib 01:25, 21 April 2020 (UTC) keep does seem factually based, also (easily) passes . Also passes as article is not solely based on a controversy or local incident. OP's Special:Contributions/NameShiba|contributions also seem a little suspicious, I might add — from the account creation (17 April) to now, |almost all of them seem to revolve around Epik? Call me a conspiracy theorist but I think something fishy's going on Deletion of Epik (domain registrar) WP:GNG||WP:CORP||WP:SPA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +298 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cooters User:Ijanderson977 22:38, 27 January 2009 (UTC) delete Fails because it only has albums and independent labels making the band not notable. Also lack of references. No-one has explained how it passes either, this is because it doesn't pass it Deletion of The Cooters WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +299 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circle hand game (Second nomination) User:Amarkov 22:59, 8 December 2006 (UTC) delete """WP:V, , the like. Also note that is not a reason for keeping, and isn't an """"I don't have to give sources"""" card""" Deletion of Circle hand game (Second nomination) WP:OR||WP:IKNOWIT||WP:IAR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +300 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AeronautX Luftfahrtschule User:D4iNa4 18:30, 10 January 2019 (UTC) delete per nom. Fails Deletion of AeronautX Luftfahrtschule WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +301 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Sprachman User:Alansohn 18:41, 27 March 2015 (UTC) keep Passes , as laid out by Deletion of Paul Sprachman WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +302 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wake Self User:Smile 17:27, 4 March 2015 (UTC) keep """meets |GNG, article creator. The articles by Local iQ, ABQ-Live, and Santa Fe Reporter are not trivial, and they are independent. Some of them are interviews, which are primary in nature, but they do not amount to original research or self-published sourcing, meaning they are acceptable in |BLP. Performing nationally with a well-known hip-hop group, being recognized by a notable member of that group, and performing internationally all indicate some level of importance. From Santa Fe Reporter,""""he might be one of the few New Mexican rappers to have toured Europe"""". From Fuse Weekly, """"integral part of Albuquerque’s hip-hop scene for the better part of a decade""" Deletion of Wake Self WP:GNG||WP:BLP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +303 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atheist Universe User:Horselover 20:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC) delete Fails to meet Deletion of Atheist Universe WP:BK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +304 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheetal Prashad Pal User:Mrt3366 16:18, 17 February 2013 (UTC) delete per nom and perhaps is applicable here Deletion of Sheetal Prashad Pal WP:G3 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +305 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional kangaroos and wallabies User:Hans 20:14, 8 October 2010 (UTC) keep per Deletion of List of fictional kangaroos and wallabies WP:OTHERSTUFF Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +306 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophie Costa User:Qworty 19:41, 3 June 2008 (UTC) delete """as a """"no context"""" and . Disruptive de-prodding, edit warring, and hardly constitute good reasons to drag out an AfD on a one-sentence article. All of the nominator's actions on this one, including the two prods and now the AfD, have been in good faith, so an early close would be appropriate here. Thank you""" Deletion of Sophie Costa WP:SNOW||WP:POINT Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +307 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wings of Fire (novel series) User:Rorshacma 16:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC) keep The current article is definitely in terrible shape and needs some major cleanup, but the series itself passes the . The one source currently in the article regarding the upcoming TV adaptation is a decent one, as are the ones listed by DiamondRemley39 above. And I'm finding plenty of other, smaller, sources as well, either regarding the comic or TV adaptations or mini-reviews on some of the products. So, again, terrible current article, but a subject that passes the and Deletion of Wings of Fire (novel series) WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +308 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desktop Cyber User:Bwilkins 11:38, 13 August 2011 (UTC) delete I've written a lot of print articles on IT topics, but cannot find anything that remotely considers this to be |notable. Maybe someday, but not now. This is exactly the argument about COI - we *know* that it's important/notable to the product owner, that does not make it notable for an encylopedia Deletion of Desktop Cyber WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +309 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elene Church User:Wm335td 19:59, 2 January 2020 (UTC) delete fails . if kept it needs Deletion of Elene Church WP:GNG||WP:TNT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +310 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethnoburb (2nd nomination) User:Colonel 19:00, 3 November 2010 (UTC) keep The topic is notable and so should be kept in accordance with our |editing policy Deletion of Ethnoburb (2nd nomination) WP:PRESERVE Wikipedia:Editing policy 24 +311 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weihwa Chinese School User:CaliforniaAliBaba 04:33, 31 December 2009 (UTC) delete Zero signs of non-trivial coverage either http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=annandale+weihwa&btnG=Search+Archives&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&scoring=a in English or http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22%E7%B6%AD%E8%8F%AF%E4%B8%AD%E6%96%87%E5%AD%B8%E6%A0%A1+&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&btnG=Search+Archives in Chinese Deletion of Weihwa Chinese School WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +312 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Direct Save Protocol User:Mark 19:43, 19 September 2018 (UTC) merge This is a verifiable protocol per the spec linked to in the external sources. It is a small but important addition of the X drag and drop protocol. It is then worth merging the first sentence into X_Window_selection#XDND with the spec as a source verifying as an |alternative to deletion. --{{u| Deletion of Direct Save Protocol WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +313 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horseheads High School User:Thivierr 05:06, 19 January 2006 (UTC) keep per . Some work on references may be needed though. Also, can somebody familiar with this tell, if this school is related to the one of the same name/place with a graduating class in 1888? http://www.rootsweb.com/~srgp/souvenir/1919ww1h.htm http://www.rootsweb.com/~srgp/articles/horschro.htm. Perhaps one school was built, torn down, and entirely new largely unrelated one built later. Or maybe it was a a continuation of the same institution, but a different building (as is often the case with some schools, for which we discuss all buildings in one article). Since this is speculation on my part (aka unverified) I obviously didn't mention it in the article. As for merge suggestions, I suggest, that since the district has exactly one high school, and we merge to districts (if possible), any merger be done to *this* article. That is if any elem substubs are made, they be merged/redirected here, rather then merging/redirecting this elsewhere Deletion of Horseheads High School WP:SCH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +314 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of lowest scoring games in the NFL User:Cbl62 02:59, 14 February 2020 (UTC) delete per . The list also appears to have been copied from http://mcubed.net/nfl/pttotlgm.shtml this site and be a possible Deletion of List of lowest scoring games in the NFL WP:LISTN||WP:COPYVIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +315 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Morton's - the medical helpline User:Daicaregos 08:36, 19 August 2016 (UTC) keep The article subject satisfies i.e. ''the organization is notable enough to justify a separate article on the verifiable evidence that the organization or product has attracted the notice of reliable sources unrelated to the organization or product.'' Further, per , ''Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material.'' Disclosure: article creator Deletion of Dr Morton's - the medical helpline WP:ORGIN||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +316 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anand Bhatt (musician) User:Vertium 20:49, 7 September 2012 (UTC) comment As a reminder, these aren't votes. The decision is made by consensus and people can offer as much evidence to support their !vote as they like. The multiple items inserted by 99.99.174.248 (who is strongly encouraged to create an account), should have been encapsulated into one !vote, but just because they entered them as multiple items doesn't give them additional weight in the formation of the consensus. Also, I encourage asking if someone is the subject of or related to the subject of the article instead of accusing them. Please remember that is a fundamental rule here and suspicions don't count - evidence does. I'll do some of my own research and cast a !vote here soon. Thanks Deletion of Anand Bhatt (musician) WP:AGF Wikipedia:Assume good faith 53 +317 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My BFF User:Ward3001 22:15, 3 October 2008 (UTC) delete per #Songs and Deletion of My BFF WP:MUSIC||WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +318 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of world's most expensive transport infrastructure User:Ivanvector 18:02, 5 March 2015 (UTC) keep very good points made by nominator, but I think this list can be fixed rather than deleted. I don't think it is necessarily to have a superlative list based on a comparison of reliably-sourced information - comparing dollars to dollars is not |original research. I agree that it would be better divided into lists by type of infrastructure, but I think the key for longer-term projects is following the sources to determine which qualify as singular projects versus combinations of separate projects. For example, the Interstate Highway System is commonly referred to in reliable sources as a singular venture and there is a reliable source for its singular cost, although individual improvements are considered separate (e.g. Big Dig). Other large maintenance projects are considered separate infrastructure projects (e.g. Eastern span replacement of the San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge), and some projects are actually several smaller projects lumped together as one major project by reliable sources (e.g. Honshū–Shikoku Bridge Project). Probably the list should only include projects which are complete or substantially under construction; projects which are well-known but aren't approved can't have a reliable source for their cost and shouldn't be included (looking at you, Hurontario-Main LRT). Reliable sources should be available in the linked articles; it's a different problem if they're not Deletion of List of world's most expensive transport infrastructure WP:SYNTH||WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +319 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of starships in Stargate User:Shooterwalker 20:53, 22 November 2012 (UTC) delete because #PLOT. Articles need sufficient context, not just a recap of various plot elements, no matter how novel or interesting it might be to extract those plot elements (in this case, ships). That context can only come from reliable sources that can . And even if we could, it's not to say we would need a list of every ship above and beyond a short description of the ships as a whole Deletion of List of starships in Stargate WP:NOT||WP:verify notability Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +320 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Left Bank Outfall Drain User:Capitals00 12:52, 27 April 2018 (UTC) delete Sources are and circulated across internet through sources that are ultimately related with the primary source. Lack of independent coverage in third party sources Deletion of Left Bank Outfall Drain WP:PRIMARY Wikipedia:No original research 12 +321 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kutty Shranku User:Appoose81 11:25, 26 February 2008 (UTC) delete per . I (page creator) acknowledge that the article violates these policy and support the removal of the page Deletion of Kutty Shranku WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NFF Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +322 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryos (DJ) User:Paulmcdonald 19:35, 23 September 2016 (UTC) delete supporting speedy. Violates , a long-established guideline. Wikipedia is not a free web hosting server Deletion of Ryos (DJ) WP:ADV Wikipedia:External links 45 +323 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fraser Harding User:Crusio 09:07, 5 January 2009 (UTC) delete Givne that even the article creator agrees, I suggest someone closes this now per or something like that Deletion of Fraser Harding WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +324 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Foreign Relations (2nd nomination) [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|V]] [[Special:Contributions/Jéské Couriano|S]] [[User: Jéské Couriano|M]] 04:01, 28 October 2011 (UTC) delete for want of sources to establish otability|notability. —''Jeremy'' v^_^v Components Deletion of Journal of Foreign Relations (2nd nomination) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +325 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom D’Agostino User:Bearian 13:52, 21 August 2018 (UTC) delete """people who run """"marketing|distribution"""" companies are |dime a dozen until Betsy DeVos|they own at least four yachts. Husbands do |not inherit notability from their wives unless Prince Phillip|they get an HRH in front of their names""" Deletion of Tom D’Agostino WP:MILL||WP:NOTINHERITED Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill 32 +326 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional nurses User:Northamerica1000 17:24, 26 September 2017 (UTC) keep Qualifies for an article per relative to :Category:Fictional nurses Deletion of List of fictional nurses WP:NOTDUP Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates 5 +327 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Black (2nd nomination) User:Wikicology 21:38, 10 January 2016 (UTC) keep she appears to meet . Some of the sources provided are in-depth Deletion of Linda Black (2nd nomination) WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +328 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Wood User:David 19:59, 15 April 2016 (UTC) delete Sources are either by him or don't mention him, and the major claims of the article have no reliable sourcing. I didn't see any highly cited publications in Google scholar. No evidence of passing or Deletion of Matt Wood WP:PROF||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +329 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Beginner's Guide to Snuff User:DBigXray 19:01, 5 July 2018 (UTC) keep Per above, Nom has failed to point out the Policy this article violates. IMHO passes Deletion of A Beginner's Guide to Snuff WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +330 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Quickenden User:Fenix 11:17, 15 December 2014 (UTC) keep per GS, fails , but X Factor plus IMACGMOOH appearances probably enough for GNG Deletion of Jake Quickenden WP:NFOOTY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +331 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eisenman Synagogue User:Antwerpen 18:20, 9 February 2011 (UTC) keep Meets all the requirements of and in particular the '''General notability guidelines Deletion of Eisenman Synagogue WP:NOTABILITY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +332 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1998 St. Cloud explosion User:Michaelzeng7 19:54, 24 May 2013 (UTC) keep Bushranger has found sources that range across years of time: evidence that this topic is notable and meeting . Further, |notability is not temporary Deletion of 1998 St. Cloud explosion WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:NOTTEMPORARY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +333 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Island View Residential Treatment Center User:Septrillion 20:24, 7 July 2018 (UTC) keep passes . \\\Septrillion Deletion of Island View Residential Treatment Center WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +334 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mythology of Lost User:I 20:52, 17 January 2013 (UTC) delete in agreement with the nominator. This doesn't really seem like appropriate content for Wikipedia (as it is mostly unsourced or interpretative speculation from primary/non-independent sources) and represents a |content fork where none is needed Deletion of Mythology of Lost WP:CONTENTFORK Wikipedia:Content forking 33 +335 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016–17 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season User:Kosack 14:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC) keep season articles for sides in a fully professional league are notable under . Poor quality should not result in deletion, article needs improving not deleting Deletion of 2016–17 Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C. season WP:NSEASONS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +336 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethem User:Anupam 06:44, 21 April 2010 (UTC) keep per . Thanks Deletion of Ethem WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +337 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Courchaine (ice hockey, born 1989) [[User talk:Ravenswing|''' '' Ravenswing '' ''']] 07:49, 10 April 2016 (UTC) delete """sighs) Yet another """"what was he thinking?"""" creation of a NN substub hockey article, and I'm almost at the point of writing |WP:ITSFROMDOLOVIS into . Somewhat brazenly, he set forth that the """"honour"""" qualifying this mid-minors goalie with no distinction for an article was being on a team that won its league championship. Fails NHOCKEY, no evidence that the subject meets the GNG""" Deletion of Adam Courchaine (ice hockey, born 1989) WP:BULLSHIT||WP:COMMONOUTCOMES Wikipedia:Complete bollocks 62 +338 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holmen High School User:Alansohn 11:31, 21 March 2007 (UTC) comment Just like filing a lawsuit, anybody can start an AfD for any reason valid or invalid, and they usually do. The reality is that many of the articles listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Schools were perfect examples of articles that had already demonstrated notability, or could be (and were) improved to further demonstrate notability. The fact that you and others have decided to nominate schools for deletion is no indication of the merit of these AfDs. I have expanded this article and other similar articles because they deserve to be retained. I never attended Holmen High School, I'm not even quite sure where it's located. But I do know that the article has multiple, non-trivial |reliable and |verifiable sources to demonstrate notability Deletion of Holmen High School WP:RS||WP:V Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +339 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Force FM User:Joe 02:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC) delete I can't find |significant coverage for this radio station Deletion of Force FM WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +340 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David A. Bray User:Hasteur 13:05, 29 December 2015 (UTC) delete """I concur that the argument for notability is on that margin edge of being notable and a courteous collapsing is reasonable. I would note (particularly in the direction of the subject of the article) that it would take a few controversial or very popular opinions to push over into definite notability and inclusion, and therefore wish to indicate that the |""""Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion"""" should not be used short of a exact copy of the text going forward. I'd rather have the debate full out every time as the standards could raise or lower and the BLP's own actions could raise or lower their notability""" Deletion of David A. Bray WP:G4 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +341 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leishenshan Hospital User:Hijiri88 01:23, 5 February 2020 (UTC) merge The only content in this article that doesn't more properly belong in the coronavirus outbreak article is the etymology stuff; if all we can write on a topic is etymological information on its name, it |doesn't belong here Deletion of Leishenshan Hospital WP:NOTDICT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +342 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ditchconnect User:Onceonthisisland 16:42, 11 November 2007 (UTC) delete Obviously something made up by the creator of the article. #Wikipedia_is_not_a_publisher_of_original_thought Deletion of Ditchconnect WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +343 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PEOBASE User:Qwertyus 08:20, 13 June 2015 (UTC) delete """per #A7: """"does not indicate why its subject is important or significant""" Deletion of PEOBASE WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +344 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contender (stock character) User:Snow 02:03, 19 December 2017 (UTC) delete Whoever authored this article may find their approach welcome at TV tropes, but under this project's guidelines, this is blatant riginal research that hasn't even so much as been masked by a single reference. This is certainly an archetype we can all recognize, but we don't create articles based solely on our own observations of narrative trends. Again, there's a voluminous and very interesting project devoted to exactly this purpose, but Wikipedia is not it Deletion of Contender (stock character) WP:O Wikipedia:Orphan 48 +345 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nayeem Ahmad Khan User:Worldbruce 13:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC) comment """Without taking a position on the notability of the subject, I note that prior to nomination s and IPs had removed a reference and vandalized his name and biodata. Searches in Bengali, by his name as stated in the text at the time of nomination, and/or with keywords """"Bangladeshi"""" or """"businessman"""", would have found no results, because the subject is ''none of those things''. Searches for """"Nayeem Khan"""" with parties """"Hurriyat Conference"""", """"JKLF"""", or """"JKNF"""" are more productive""" Deletion of Nayeem Ahmad Khan WP:SPA Wikipedia:Single-purpose account 21 +346 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Markoff User:AniMate 01:38, 25 April 2009 (UTC) delete per . Every high profile murder isn't encyclopedic, and massive coverage only means news agencies want to sell a salacious story for more viewers or readers. Sadly, media manipulation seems to be lost on many Wikipedia editors Deletion of Philip Markoff WP:ONEEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +347 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Christian Bollywood actresses User:Cavarrone 09:47, 5 August 2016 (UTC) delete same as List of Muslim Bollywood actresses, pure , no indication that religion influences acting skills Deletion of List of Christian Bollywood actresses WP:TRIVIA Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +348 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert D. Parks User:Dsreyn 12:52, 6 July 2006 (UTC) delete None of that seems to satisfy . Holding professor positions at different universities is hardly notable, and the center at Florida Atlantic (essentially an extension of his school board position http://www.coe.fau.edu/tlc/content/about-index.htm) doesn't appear to make him worthy of an entry either. If he has additional academic notability, it needs to be added to the article Deletion of Robert D. Parks WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +349 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/6Q0B44E User:Gwernol 01:48, 9 September 2006 (UTC) keep WP:V|Verifiable with coverage in a major British newspaper that gives a reasonable claim of |notability. Being on the Internet is not a goods measure of significance, IMHO Deletion of 6Q0B44E WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +350 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skruff User:Eusebeus 18:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Skruff WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +351 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bubble (2013 film) User:Erik 21:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC) delete due to lack of notability per the |general notability guidelines. All I can find are passing mentions, both last year and from last March, about this film about to be released. There does not seem to be any traction or significant coverage. Until there is some, it is too premature to have an article on Wikipedia Deletion of The Bubble (2013 film) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +352 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economy Car Rentals User:AllyD 06:23, 24 May 2013 (UTC) delete This would be a suitable article for a business directory, but this is an encyclopaedia. Lack of |reliable 3rd party sources to demonstrate compliance with the criteria Deletion of Economy Car Rentals :WP:RS||:WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +353 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Birgenheier User:David 17:16, 13 June 2020 (UTC) keep The article is puffed up with minor awards, self-sourced descriptions of her research, and other non-accomplishments, but (even if we ignore the Baksi reference that appears not to be hers) the Google Scholar record https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=c1qrHrQAAAAJ shows enough well-cited papers to convince me of a pass of #C1 Deletion of Lauren Birgenheier WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +354 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curb stomping User:Paiev 02:06, 14 December 2007 (UTC) delete per and . As a comment, it is not . There seems to have been an AfD on this before that I cannot find; however, the old page can at least be seen through a google cache. The deleted version was far more encyclopedic than this. —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Deletion of Curb stomping WP:NEO||WP:DICT||WP:NFT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +355 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Haiti earthquake conspiracy theories User:Pontificalibus 09:46, 28 January 2010 (UTC) delete """It seems there is nothing notable here that can't be adequately covered in other articles. The HAARP claim doesn't have reliable sources, the """"concerns over military occuption"""" claim is not really a conspiracy theory and the rest doesn't meet and so certainly shouldn't be given |undue weight by having it's own article""" Deletion of 2010 Haiti earthquake conspiracy theories WP:FRINGE||WP:UNDUE Wikipedia:Fringe theories 44 +356 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secular Homeschooling User:WikiDan61 22:02, 6 July 2015 (UTC) comment It's not clear that there is a lot of validly sourced material to merge. I'm not entirely sure the article wasn't created merely as a |coatrack for the links to the secular homeschooling website that its primary source Deletion of Secular Homeschooling WP:COATRACK Wikipedia:Coatrack articles 47 +357 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What. User:SarahStierch 04:15, 12 December 2013 (UTC) delete Appears to be . We could even userfy it until it makes it big Deletion of What. WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +358 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Olga of Hanover User:TimothyBlue 05:39, 15 August 2020 (UTC) delete This is nothing more than a genealogical record. The topic fails and . There are no reliable sources independent of the subject that cover anything directly and indepth about this individual because they have done absolutely nothing notable. Being related to a public figure is not notable . Wikipedia is of non-notable members in royal families.   //  Deletion of Princess Olga of Hanover WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:INVALIDBIO||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NOTGENEALOGY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +359 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 Christmas message of Italian Catholic Priest Piero Corsi User:JohnCD 22:45, 22 January 2013 (UTC) delete """An non-notable person says something controversial, and there is a short-lived fuss about it. Yawn. See #NEWS #2 on """"enduring notability""" Deletion of 2012 Christmas message of Italian Catholic Priest Piero Corsi WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +360 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sokol Çikalleshi User:GiantSnowman 12:18, 24 June 2009 (UTC) delete per nom; non-notable player who fails Deletion of Sokol Çikalleshi WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +361 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vicca (2nd nomination) User:Gene93k 12:26, 29 July 2015 (UTC) delete """The """"Best Solo Sex Scene"""" award win is scene-related and does not count for passing . Being a Penthouse Pet does not establish notability either. Lacks significant reliable source coverage to pass . Brief mentions in ''Adult Video News'' are not enough""" Deletion of Vicca (2nd nomination) WP:PORNBIO||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +362 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arpita Mukherjee (2nd nomination) User:scope_creep 10:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC) delete Tenuous arguments. There is no claim to fame here. Almost completely non-notable. The competition aren't that special now. There is so many of them. Fails as well. Where is the social media?? There is nothing there Deletion of Arpita Mukherjee (2nd nomination) WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +363 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Chilton (game developer) [[User talk:66.191.253.210|talk]]) 07:36, 27 March 2008 (UTC) delete This person is not notable enough to have a Wikipedia article. He is only known within the World of Warcraft(WoW) community and that is only due to his attendance to company (Blizzard) sponsored conferences. There are not Wikipedia article about the lead designers of Microsoft Office or Visual Studio,are there? The work Tom Chilton has done with WoW is intellectual property of Blizzard/Vivendi, it belongs to that company, not Tom Chilton. Also, citing Blizzard's websites as sources is not adhereing to . The company is not a reliable source for unbiased information regarding its development team.Special:Contributions/66.191.253.210|66.191.253.210 Deletion of Tom Chilton (game developer) WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +364 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Avery User:Isotope23 15:41, 3 April 2006 (UTC) delete doesn't meet criteria... borderline speedy CSD:A7 Deletion of Matthew Avery WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +365 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meat Light User:Mudwater 22:22, 9 April 2017 (UTC) keep I have added three references to the article, which I believe are sufficient to establish that the album in question meets the notability criteria at and . I would request other editors to review this and reassess what they have posted here. Thanks. {{Ping|Aoba47|Exemplo347 Deletion of Meat Light WP:GNG||WP:NALBUM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +366 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rod D. Martin (2nd nomination) [[User talk:Satori Son|Satori Son]] 13:50, 17 September 2006 (UTC) delete While the subject appears to be on the cusp of achieving the required level of notability, I am more concerned with the quality of sources for much of the information presented. Besides the ''Washington Post Online Live'' interview transcript and the FEC press release, '''all''' of the other sources are either completely self-published or at the least self-submitted autobiography. And while self-published sources may be used in some cases to flesh out information on already notable subjects, they cannot be used to ''establish'' notability. Other than the fact that he has co-edited one book and that his campaign committee for a failed U.S. House run was fined by the FEC, almost every other statement in this article should be removed as improperly verified per . When Mr. Martin achieves the required level of notability, we will be able to find reputable, third-party sources from which to write the new article Deletion of Rod D. Martin (2nd nomination) WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +367 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IdeaSIP User:Jayvdb 20:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC) comment Special:Contributions/Eneref is a , and almost certainly a COI Deletion of IdeaSIP WP:SPA Wikipedia:Single-purpose account 21 +368 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohandeep Singh User:GermanKity 16:34, 19 July 2021 (UTC) delete The references to till date did not establish the notability of the subject. fails Deletion of Rohandeep Singh WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +369 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brizzly (2nd nomination) User:Lemongirl942 03:31, 15 August 2016 (UTC) merge This is one of the numerous Twitter apps released everyday but was noticed and taken over by AOL and then killed off. Technology companies tends to receive a lot more coverage than others precisely because sources like techcrunch, mashable, gizmodo and numerous others specifically focus on it(which probably contributes to the on Wikipedia). Which is why it is important to see stuff in perspective. If you look at the sources, the app received a lot of initial publicity in 2009 when it was launched and later in 2010 when it was acquired by AOL. The next bit of news coverage it received was when AOL killed it off. (Some of the coverage btw deals more with the company not with the app; this article btw is solely about the app not the company). If we do the , is this app really significant in the grand scheme of things? For an app with such a short lifespan and whose sole claim of significance is that it was an app for Twitter, I would like a sentence of two of this to remain in the encyclopaedia, but there isn't enough for a page solely for itself (See ). A mention at a it of Twitter services helps to improve that page. I would suggest a redirect and selective merge to List of Twitter services and applications Deletion of Brizzly (2nd nomination) WP:SYSTEMICBIAS||WP:10YT||WP:PAGEDECIDE Wikipedia:Systemic bias 83 +370 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam O'Hirsi User:Coredesat 09:14, 26 June 2006 (UTC) delete fails - only 4 unique Google hits Deletion of Adam O'Hirsi WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +371 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mal logic User:Heimstern 00:18, 4 October 2006 (UTC) comment I seriously debated tagging this for speedy under #G1, but wasn't quite sure it was in fact patent nonsense Deletion of Mal logic WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +372 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jayden Jaymes User:Rebecca1990 08:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC) keep """She passes because she has won a well-known and significant industry award; AVN's Best Body fan award in 2014, and she has been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media; she has a lot more than just an MTV appearance. Winning two fan voted awards over a period of five years is evidence that she also passes 's criteria #2 which states """"Has a large fan base or a significant """"cult"""" following""" Deletion of Jayden Jaymes WP:PORNBIO||WP:ENTERTAINER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +373 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dakota Valley Elementary School User:VanTucky 04:07, 9 August 2007 (UTC) comment Notability is not established through the opinions of students, it is established through |reliable, published sources. We do not automatically assume a subject is notable without independent sources and work from there, despite what some think of schools. Of course feel free to search for independent verification of some possible notability, but we judge articles ''as they stand'', not by guessing or assumptions Deletion of Dakota Valley Elementary School WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +374 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Airlines Flight 1175 User:AyaanLamar 18:58, 14 February 2018 (UTC) keep The article clearly satisfies . It states that 'if a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list', this itself is a reason to keep the page. Moreover, the given sources have exclusive articles on the incident which clearly states that it is a popular aviation accident and is investigates by FAA and NTSB Deletion of United Airlines Flight 1175 WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +375 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lilia Stepanova User:Stalwart111 03:16, 20 August 2021 (UTC) keep """articles like https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2037245/Lilia-Stepanova-The-contortionist-shoots-arrow-bow-feet.html this are sufficient, and there are other |non-English sources that are similar. The deletion rationale needs to be better here because the article itself lists the sort of coverage she has received and being a special guests on any one of those television shows would likely be considered more than """"trivial""" Deletion of Lilia Stepanova WP:NOENG Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +376 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naukrigulf.com User:AllyD 08:46, 31 March 2017 (UTC) delete to the parent: A market-specific employment portal alongside :Naukri.com and others, under :Info Edge (India). While there is |evidence of the operation, it does not indicate independent notability Deletion of Naukrigulf.com :WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +377 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafal Zielinski User:Piotrus 07:49, 16 June 2021 (UTC) delete Created 10 years ago, and still looks quite bad, failing . Likely a case of or self-promo anyway Deletion of Rafal Zielinski WP:GNG||WP:VANITY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +378 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Europeanization of the Scriptures User:DustFormsWords 03:59, 24 May 2010 (UTC) delete No sources provided establishing notability of topic. The nature of the topic makes independent searches for notability problematic at best. Much or all of the article appears to be |original research or at the very least unsourced. No clear rationale is provided for why this material can't be dealt with in existing Bible articles, making it an impermissible |content fork Deletion of Europeanization of the Scriptures WP:OR||WP:FORK Wikipedia:No original research 12 +379 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Mauldin User:Moreschi 14:15, 6 April 2007 (UTC) delete per Simoncursitor, to the letter. Checking the web is giving little in the way of stuff that might satisfy and . Seemingly just another businessman with half-decent PR Deletion of John Mauldin WP:ATT||WP:N Wikipedia:Attribution 34 +380 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gell-Mann amnesia effect User:Lightburst 02:37, 10 August 2019 (UTC) merge into Michael_Crichton#Other_speeches deletion is a disservice to our readers, Deletion of Gell-Mann amnesia effect WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +381 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unstoppable (2010 film) User:MichaelQSchmidt 18:52, 16 August 2009 (UTC) keep and further source. Yes, though tells us a film that has not entered production should not have an article, it also allows/expects consideration of the occasional exception and the use of common sense. As ThaddeusB points out, this one qualifies as one of the exceptions to that rule, as it has enough coverage to qualify for inclusion even were it to be never made. I will myself be adding sourcing in a few hours if others have not beaten me to it Deletion of Unstoppable (2010 film) WP:NFF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +382 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Once Upon a Time in Bolivia (2nd nomination) User:MichaelQSchmidt 19:12, 16 December 2014 (UTC) keep per ''just'' meeting . I note that |sources are available, even if not being used as citations. No need to something per . And while not as earth-stopping as an Academy Award, winning Best International Feature at London Independent Film Festival is not exactly minor Deletion of Once Upon a Time in Bolivia (2nd nomination) WP:NF||WP:NRVE||WP:KEEPLISTING||WP:NOEFFORT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +383 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egypt national ice hockey team User:Flibirigit 18:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC) delete fails without reliable sources Deletion of Egypt national ice hockey team WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +384 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nobody's Angel (Lindsay Lohan Album) User:Stifle 17:35, 14 October 2007 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Nobody's Angel (Lindsay Lohan Album) WP:CBALL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +385 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northeast District Student Council User:Littleteddy 11:52, 6 March 2008 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Northeast District Student Council WP:N||WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +386 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giveaway User:Onebravemonkey 12:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC) delete Simply a couple of lines of half-arsed non-specific |VSCA. Hardly worth the trouble Deletion of Giveaway WP:VSCA Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +387 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Heath (footballer) User:Peter 17:01, 7 December 2020 (UTC) keep It's better to have a complete set of articles here for than maintain a complete set on another site and a separate incomplete set here. Subject-specific guidelines are more important than as a reason to delete an article, there's no reason to say they shouldn't be as a reason to keep an article Deletion of Nick Heath (footballer) WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +388 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bapunagar Darpan User:GPL93 12:50, 28 February 2020 (UTC) delete None of the sourcing is reliable or independent. Fails and . Best Deletion of Bapunagar Darpan WP:GNG||WP:NMEDIA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +389 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smidge User:Æk 02:50, 31 December 2009 (UTC) merge to wiktionary, per Deletion of Smidge WP:NOTDICT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +390 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barks Babes & Bros User:Jmertel23 02:19, 1 February 2019 (UTC) delete Sounds like a good cause, but that has no bearing on notability. Promotional, and lacking in reliable, independent sources. Fails Deletion of Barks Babes & Bros WP:EVENTCRITERIA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +391 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward L. Cochran User:Xxanthippe 22:42, 14 August 2013 (UTC) keep Passes rof#1 with a GS h-index of 18, plus political activities Deletion of Edward L. Cochran WP:P Wikipedia:Portal 50 +392 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love twins User:Rebecca1990 00:37, 29 April 2013 (UTC) keep """Passes , which states """"has made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre, such as beginning a trend in pornography"""", in this case, twin porn""" Deletion of Love twins WP:PORNBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +393 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corey Boudreaux User:Seasider91 18:41, 19 July 2012 (UTC) delete Not notable and fails Deletion of Corey Boudreaux WP:ATH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +394 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Barnett [[User talk:Jhall1|talk page]]) 09:49, 18 March 2011 (UTC) keep comfortably meets notability requirements of and . JH Deletion of Alex Barnett WP:ATHLETE||WP:CRIN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +395 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Basketball Association User:BDD 19:56, 26 March 2013 (UTC) delete per Deletion of British Basketball Association WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +396 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Washington Tower User:Hirolovesswords 06:25, 23 December 2014 (UTC) delete Fails . Has not received significant coverage in independent sources Deletion of George Washington Tower WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +397 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viscera Trail User:TheJazzDalek 12:22, 13 March 2010 (UTC) delete I can't find anything that would satisfy Deletion of Viscera Trail WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +398 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gordon Adomdza User:The 12:56, 7 March 2019 (UTC) delete this |unsourced, |promotional text about a non-|Wikinotable businessman Deletion of Gordon Adomdza WP:PRIMARY||WP:PROMO||WP:NPERSON Wikipedia:No original research 12 +399 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Athanasios Gelinos User:Stifle 18:37, 14 May 2008 (UTC) delete As there are no |reliable sources |cited, I am persuaded that the article does not comply with the |verifiability policy Deletion of Athanasios Gelinos WP:RS||WP:CITE||WP:V Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +400 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Cross User:Colapeninsula 16:46, 30 June 2015 (UTC) delete Doesn't quite meet notability requirements. A couple of reasonable-sized roles in B movies: ''Wet and Wild Summer!'' and ''The Last Patrol'' (aka ''The Last Warrior''). Plus some smaller parts. But I can't see in-depth coverage, and that doesn't quite meet . Note that New Zealand actor Rebecca Carlton was also sometimes billed as Rebecca Cross or Rebekah Cross in the 1990s, the same time as this Rebecca Cross was working Deletion of Rebecca Cross WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +401 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wurn Technique User:MelanieN 19:19, 12 May 2012 (UTC) delete Promotional, not notable. Nothing but press releases at Google News. This is an alternative-medicine technique (and like many alternative-medicine techniques, it claims to be effective for an astonishing variety of unrelated issues, ranging from infertility to endometriosis to fallopian tube occlusion). It was invented (and apparently is only practiced) by a husband-and-wife team of physical therapists. It appears from their press releases that they have copyrighted the terms Wurn Technique® and Clear Passage Physical Therapy®. They have published several articles about their techniques http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=wurn+bf&hl=en&btnG=Search&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp=on, but the articles are not heavily cited enough to pass Deletion of The Wurn Technique WP:ACADEMIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +402 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benwood Junction, West Virginia User:MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:04, 22 May 2021 (UTC) delete Does not meet Deletion of Benwood Junction, West Virginia WP:GEOLAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +403 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pasupati Group (2nd nomination) User:onel5969 12:28, 27 December 2020 (UTC) delete nothing has changed in the two days since the last discussion was closed, not enough in-depth coverage to pass either or . Just like the discussion of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pasupati Agrovet Deletion of Pasupati Group (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +404 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of jägerbomb variations User:Bigger 22:59, 16 September 2010 (UTC) delete I'm tempted to make up a new version and call it the Bigger Bomb, for my 3 milliseconds of fame. Any verifiable variations can be added to the jagerbomb article, at the moment this is just a load of , some of which repeats. Oh, and no hint of otability Deletion of List of jägerbomb variations WP:OR||WP:N Wikipedia:No original research 12 +405 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scientology discography User:Cirt 05:40, 24 January 2008 (UTC) comment At the moment, the ''entire'' article/list and everything in it is unsourced at any rate, and has been for quite some time. As such, even if it is not deleted, any unsourced/ information in the article that is not cited should be removed. That would leave the article with - nothing Deletion of Scientology discography WP:OR||WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +406 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Lee Dumas NONE NONE delete forbes, inc and entrepreneur alone are not sources with sufficient editorial oversight to create notability on Wikipedia, especially as the above linked sources are contributor pieces, not staff writers. In other words, those pieces are written by marketers and bloggers and not journalists. I acknowledge that sources like these are often used to fill out details in an article such as this but we should not rely on these types of sources entirely for notability, especially with respect to . Thus, doesn’t apply here. There is a genuine question surrounding subject’s notability Deletion of John Lee Dumas WP:BLP||WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +407 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saad Alzahrani User:David 21:42, 7 March 2017 (UTC) delete per and . Graduate students are almost always not yet notable (because their papers haven't had enough impact yet and it is too difficult to disentangle their contributions from the contributions of their more notable coauthors) and I don't see any evidence that this one is exceptional Deletion of Saad Alzahrani WP:TOOSOON||WP:PROF Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +408 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 UCLA racism controversy User:ResidentAnthropologist 23:50, 29 March 2011 (UTC) delete per and Deletion of 2011 UCLA racism controversy WP:BLP||WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +409 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unofficial Graal Communication Center User:Steel359 23:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC) delete per |NOT a place for forums with only 280 members Deletion of Unofficial Graal Communication Center WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +410 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neda Agha-Soltan User:Corpx 06:59, 28 June 2009 (UTC) merge per . Most of the people commenting here are not addressing policy, but rather are commenting based on their views towards this person. She did not do anything notable before being killed and it's yet to be known if her death will have any long term notability Deletion of Neda Agha-Soltan WP:ONEEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +411 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalka–Barmer Express User:Jumpytoo 21:35, 11 September 2020 (UTC) delete """This is an unnamed train, where the """"name"""" is basically just """"Where train starts-Where train ends Express"""". Most of these types of articles were only made by a few editors, which isn't consensus. While named trains can be notable, this typically isn't true for unnamed ones. We don't create articles for the hourly service between London Waterloo and Poole or the daily Jinan to Kunming service, which are both also unnamed. If we do write about them, it's generally on their parent railway line or company, not in a new article. A search on Google News only gave https://www.hindustantimes.com/punjab/bid-to-derail-train-near-patiala-railway-station-narrow-escape-for-400/story-afbm1GGlHuPIxixxSuLP5M.html|one result about an attempt to derail the train, but the rest is coverage about train delays and cancellations""" Deletion of Kalka–Barmer Express WP:RUNOFTHEMILL||WP:ROUTINE Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill 32 +412 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet celebrity User:MuZemike 16:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC) delete While a topic like this can possibly warrant a halfway-decent article, its current state is certainly a |spam magnet and would need a complete rewrite to become encyclopedic Deletion of Internet celebrity WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Spam 26 +413 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J.C. Warren User:Cabayi 15:42, 5 February 2019 (UTC) delete self-promotion of a self-published author. Looks like |A7/|G11 material to me Deletion of J.C. Warren WP:A7||WP:G11 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +414 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alger Chapman Jr. User:Bearian 17:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC) keep tentatively, once the sources found are added, then it would pass Deletion of Alger Chapman Jr. WP:HEY Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard 85 +415 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malamanteau User:Colapeninsula 09:30, 11 September 2012 (UTC) keep """Blogs published by established reliable news media sources, such as The Economist, or written by experts like Language Log can be notable per : """"Some news outlets host interactive columns they call blogs, and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professional journalists or are professionals in the field on which they write and the blog is subject to the news outlet's full editorial control"""", """"Self-published material may be acceptable when produced by an established expert on the topic of the article""" Deletion of Malamanteau WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +416 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of independent bookstores in the United States (2nd nomination) User:Northamerica1000 23:11, 4 July 2013 (UTC) keep """Per , """"It is neither improper nor uncommon to simultaneously have a category, a list, and a navigation template which all cover the same topic. These redundant systems of organizing information are considered to be complementary, not inappropriately duplicative."""" See also: :Category:Independent bookstores of the United States""" Deletion of List of independent bookstores in the United States (2nd nomination) WP:NOTDUP Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates 5 +417 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VIPJourneys User:AllyD 08:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC) delete An article which makes no claim of encyclopaedic notability, with advertorial, passing mention and routine announcement sources. No |evidence of |notability Deletion of VIPJourneys :WP:RS||:WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +418 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominique Strauss-Kahn Tristane Banon alleged sexual assault User:AndyTheGrump 16:28, 6 July 2011 (UTC) delete as a content fork, and with due regard to policy Deletion of Dominique Strauss-Kahn Tristane Banon alleged sexual assault WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +419 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Montgomery User:RFerreira 06:34, 12 June 2007 (UTC) delete What the nominator meant to say was that this article does not demonstrate any notability about the subject whatsoever, and is completely lacking in multiple non-trivial sources, and fails rather miserably Deletion of Andrea Montgomery WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +420 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Awaken (film) User:MichaelQSchmidt 18:12, 30 April 2012 (UTC) comment """It's premiering tonight, April 30. The Wikipedia:Article Incubator|incubator was set up specifically for cases such as this, where there is """"an intention that the article can and will be improved"""". Sadly, outright deletion, however temporary, takes the topic out of these pages and eliminates any opportunity for collaborative editing to address issues. If it is not sent to the incubator as #Incubation|deletion policy encourages, I request a relist so we might '''A)''' await expected coverage of the film, and '''B)''' not have to go through possible in a few days""" Deletion of Awaken (film) WP:DEL||WP:REFUND Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +421 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Elconin User:Studerby 08:15, 19 March 2010 (UTC) delete concur. Clearly for deleted content. On the outside chance that |reliable sources establishing |notability have appeared since that AFD 5 months ago (just before publication), I'd suggest letting it run the full 5 days though Deletion of Dan Elconin WP:COATRACK||WP:RS||WP:N Wikipedia:Coatrack articles 47 +422 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cage (enclosure) (2nd nomination) User:SMcCandlish 02:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC) keep as a basic topic we must have an article on, though the page clearly needs some work. This should be closed Deletion of Cage (enclosure) (2nd nomination) WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +423 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J money beats User:Kf4bdy 20:53, 3 November 2006 (UTC) delete Seems to fail and doesn't seem to be very notable Deletion of J money beats WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +424 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham Reuel NONE NONE delete per . If this person ever existed, he's known only for his conversion to Judaism, and that only in a single newspaper article. This policy reads, in part Deletion of Abraham Reuel WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +425 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of the tragical Christ User:Fan 22:25, 28 August 2006 (UTC) delete for now until more evidence can be found through intensive investigation. Those are |the rules here Deletion of Church of the tragical Christ WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +426 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adenike Fajemirokun User:Lonehexagon 08:45, 28 February 2018 (UTC) comment """This article doesn't need to pass because it already satisfies . The topic """"has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject""" Deletion of Adenike Fajemirokun WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +427 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kovas Boguta User:Boookabooo 11:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC) delete as it fails Deletion of Kovas Boguta WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +428 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good-Ass Job User:Stormie 10:39, 24 July 2008 (UTC) delete """unreleased albums are in general not notable; however, they may be notable if they have significant independent coverage in reliable sources"""" () - this doesn't. It has a passing mention""" Deletion of Good-Ass Job WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +429 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josep Irla i Bosch User:Valenciano 14:25, 3 March 2012 (UTC) keep Sources readily exist and some have been added, the nominator should at least observe Deletion of Josep Irla i Bosch WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +430 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristar and Red Sector Incorporated (3rd nomination) User:Vertigo 18:51, 23 June 2011 (UTC) comment How do those links meet Deletion of Tristar and Red Sector Incorporated (3rd nomination) WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +431 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shmuel Yerushalmi User:Jayvdb 22:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC) keep the nomination blurb has been proven incorrect (no harm done by the nom though for listing it on Afd); the subject meets and is not an issue Deletion of Shmuel Yerushalmi WP:BIO||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +432 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denis Smyth User:TenPoundHammer 16:08, 19 May 2007 (UTC) delete as #A7, seeing as no third party mentions are found Deletion of Denis Smyth WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +433 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mastering Jenkins User:onel5969 13:47, 6 November 2015 (UTC) delete nothing in search engines shows that it passes either or Deletion of Mastering Jenkins WP:GNG||WP:NBOOKS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +434 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eline McGeorge User:Tagishsimon 01:20, 25 March 2017 (UTC) keep I sure there's a google tutorial somewhere. I see https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Eline+McGeorge page after page after page of results, many from arts magazines ... ten pages of results in and we're getting to the Norwegian press. This is another very very poor AfD. Perhaps another close read of would be helpful Deletion of Eline McGeorge WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +435 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wayne Messam User:Muboshgu 00:43, 29 June 2021 (UTC) keep Meets for the sources covering his life, including his mayoralty and presidential campaign. –  Deletion of Wayne Messam WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +436 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeepMap User:MER 16:46, 14 December 2019 (UTC) delete promotional article about an unremarkable startup. I wouldn't be surprised if this was undisclosed paid-for spam, so I've blocked the creator for Deletion of DeepMap WP:UPE Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +437 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Local Education Agency User:John 09:32, 25 March 2020 (UTC) delete honestly, this is likely a notable subject. But as the nom said, it is little more than a dictionary definition. That could be fixed, but as it exists, it is so shallow and incomplete as to be a disservice to our readers. does apply Deletion of Local Education Agency WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +438 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taede A. Smedes User:David 23:33, 22 May 2019 (UTC) keep I found enough reviews of his books to convince me of a pass of , and there appears to be a lot more in the way of reliable sourcing about him, his books, and his views on religion available if you read Dutch Deletion of Taede A. Smedes WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +439 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of famous failures in science and engineering User:Andrewh 21:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC) keep while I voted delete for List of famous successes in science and engineering, I will give weak support for keeping this article. It's not essential to Wikipedia, and may have some problems |POV-wise, but it's always interesting to find out about the scientific or engineering projects that generally ''weren't'' so successful (it's not so interesting reading about successes, as most people, for obvious reasons, know about them anyway). Given a cleanup, this article will be much more worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia Deletion of List of famous failures in science and engineering WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +440 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/INVEA-TECH (2nd nomination) User:Stuartyeates 20:54, 11 March 2014 (UTC) delete as lacking in depth coverage in independent third party sources as required by the Deletion of INVEA-TECH (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +441 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PSKT Kemutar Telu West Sumbawa (2nd nomination) User:21 22:26, 9 December 2018 (UTC) keep as per previous comments and the previous AFD, meets Deletion of PSKT Kemutar Telu West Sumbawa (2nd nomination) WP:FOOTYN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +442 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Great White of Wildwood NJ NONE NONE keep spaced ndash}} Appears to just meet . Source examples include Deletion of The Great White of Wildwood NJ WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +443 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PokéBattlers User:Randomran 19:25, 3 November 2008 (UTC) delete Creator states that there is only one site to do with it at the moment. That's no other sources, let alone reliable third-party sources. Thus, this article fails the current and policy at this time Deletion of PokéBattlers WP:NOTABILITY||WP:VERIFIABILITY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +444 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poverty in Tanzania (2nd nomination) User:Neutrality 13:54, 12 September 2016 (UTC) delete It is possible that someday a well-sourced article can be written on this notable topic, but right now the piece of an un-salvageable disjointed personal essay. applies here. Alternatively, we could '''redirect''' to Economy of Tanzania Deletion of Poverty in Tanzania (2nd nomination) WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +445 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coptic Soldier [[user talk:Javert|'''stargaze''']] 22:08, 2 August 2009 (UTC) delete Fails . Non-notable band. →'''javért Deletion of Coptic Soldier WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +446 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Greatest Show User:The 14:17, 7 September 2006 (UTC) delete as a |non notable wrestling show Deletion of The Greatest Show WP:NN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +447 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jozef Kohut User:The 12:32, 16 May 2019 (UTC) delete since subject fails Deletion of Jozef Kohut WP:NHOCKEY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +448 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GoPets (2nd nomination) User:Monty845 08:06, 26 March 2011 (UTC) keep I fixed the transclusion on the AFD page for today, and looking at this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gryphoness talk page, I see links to http://www.redherring.com/Home/17516 and http://rpgvault.ign.com/articles/747/747270p1.html both of which seem satisfy Deletion of GoPets (2nd nomination) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +449 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Main Stage Wrestling User:Paviliolive 16:55, 2 February 2014 (UTC) delete As not meeting Deletion of Main Stage Wrestling WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +450 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Société des Amis des Universités de Paris User:Kudpung 07:38, 14 January 2013 (UTC) keep per User:Mcewan, but remove all the unsourced BLP red-listed people per Deletion of Société des Amis des Universités de Paris WP:LISTPEOPLE Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists 51 +451 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zarb-e-Sukhan NONE NONE delete This self-published poetry book doesn't come close to meeting any of the three |thresh-hold criteria for book notability Deletion of Zarb-e-Sukhan WP:BKTS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +452 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The myths of December 25th User:Kesh 01:50, 8 November 2007 (UTC) delete as |copyright violation, as indicated at the top of the article's Talk page. The primary author claims to have an email asserting the article is usable under the GDFL but 1) its apparently in Portugese and 2) we cannot take the editor's assertion that the email is real. Beyond that, it appears to be |novel synthesis or pure |original research. No reliable sources cited Deletion of The myths of December 25th WP:COPYVIO||WP:SYN||WP:OR Wikipedia:Copyright violations 16 +453 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bostyn Olivia Smith User:Non 01:07, 3 June 2015 (UTC) delete The subject is probably not notable but even if they were, this page is written in such egregiously promotional language, there's nothing to salvage. This page is absolutely Deletion of Bostyn Olivia Smith WP:G11 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +454 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of titles of Harry Potter books in other languages (2nd nomination) User:Motor 10:39, 17 June 2006 (UTC) delete there might be reasons for mentioning some translated names of Harry Potter characters (on the HP article), such as any that caused particular problems in certain languages. This, however, is cross-Wiki-language list-cruft with severe verifiabilty and problems. It does not justify its own article Deletion of List of titles of Harry Potter books in other languages (2nd nomination) WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +455 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonifacio Global City station User:Masumrezarock100 06:04, 26 June 2019 (UTC) delete Per nom and it's Deletion of Bonifacio Global City station WP:CRYSTALBALL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +456 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dudley Henriques User:Lankiveil 11:23, 24 April 2008 (UTC) delete does not meet the notability criteria Deletion of Dudley Henriques WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +457 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notre Dame Fighting Irish football series records User:UCO2009bluejay 23:56, 30 March 2016 (UTC) comment """Does this list pass and ist or fails ? Some of the sources such as """"winsipedia"""" are unreliable. '''Also, the prior discussions had the consensus that these lists should not exist at all""" Deletion of Notre Dame Fighting Irish football series records WP:GNG||WP:L||WP:NSTATS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +458 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvel Movie Universe User:Jc37 22:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC) delete Marvel Movie Universe Timeline, as blatant , and a rather duplicative list of List of Marvel Comics films Deletion of Marvel Movie Universe WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +459 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dustin McClure User:Boing 14:05, 23 February 2010 (UTC) delete """Sorry, but """"fastest 5,000 meters while wearing a 40 lb. rucksack"""", while undoubtedly an impressive feat, doesn't sound to me like it satisfies the notability requirements of - and Wikipedia doesn't have articles for single-record Guinness record holders""" Deletion of Dustin McClure WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +460 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonatype Nexus User:AllyD 06:59, 27 July 2017 (UTC) delete Searches are turning up routine coverage (announcements, etc.). There are a few how-to postings at Medium but I am not seeing the substantial coverage needed for or Deletion of Sonatype Nexus :WP:NSOFT||:WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +461 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtesy flush User:Rossami NONE delete again. You could try a transwiki but I don't think this would meet even their standards for sourcing of usage. The current version is nothing more than a dictionary definition of a neologism (both inappropriate for the encyclopedia). One of the alleged sources cited in this article isn't even about this subject - it's about a |not-particularly notable product Deletion of Courtesy flush WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +462 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Barnes User:Xxanthippe 21:42, 28 November 2016 (UTC) delete Early career academic. Only possibility for keep is a technical pass of the #C8 guideline. Probably oo soon as now Deletion of Elizabeth Barnes WP:PROF||WP:T Wikipedia:Notability 71 +463 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iqbal Shailo, PhD User:Xxanthippe 22:26, 13 June 2021 (UTC) delete Non-notable fails rof and GNG Deletion of Iqbal Shailo, PhD WP:P Wikipedia:Portal 50 +464 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malik Veazie User:Malcolmxl5 20:53, 17 September 2008 (UTC) delete Fails , as well as thlete per searches on talk page of the article Deletion of Malik Veazie WP:N||WP:BIO||WP:A Wikipedia:Notability 71 +465 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn Of Tomorrow User:Aoba47 14:31, 24 October 2016 (UTC) delete Article fails notability under and Deletion of Dawn Of Tomorrow WP:GNG||WP:MOVIE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +466 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Hernandez (intern) User:Fetchcomms 20:11, 16 January 2011 (UTC) delete Most obvious case of I have seen in 2011 Deletion of Daniel Hernandez (intern) WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +467 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Bytheway User:EBY3221 01:59, 28 October 2014 (UTC) delete """The subject has many YouTube videos and much LDS promotional material but it strikes me as - there are no reliable sources from people independent of the topic himself (as another editor called it """"the LDS silo"""") that regard Bytheway as notable""" Deletion of John Bytheway WP:SPIP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +468 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans van de Koot User:Xxanthippe 04:58, 30 October 2010 (UTC) delete GS h index = 6 so not enough for rof#C1 Deletion of Hans van de Koot WP:P Wikipedia:Portal 50 +469 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bappi Lahiri User:Jeffrd10 13:55, 11 December 2013 (UTC) keep Artical Passes and I have heard of him on the internet Deletion of Bappi Lahiri WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +470 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hideyuki Akaza User:David 03:39, 29 November 2013 (UTC) keep per #C1 Deletion of Hideyuki Akaza WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +471 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singaporean general election, 2016 User:Eduemoni 21:55, 1 February 2013 (UTC) merge or '''Redirect''' - /, this article is going to be plundered by what if arguments Deletion of Singaporean general election, 2016 WP:CRYSTAL||WP:FUTURE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +472 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wu-Invasion Mixtape Series: World Edition Volume 1 User:Richard3120 16:51, 18 July 2018 (UTC) delete fails . And there won't be any independent sources for this, because the albums are only available through Wu Tang's website, AND the contributing artists pay to have their tracks included on the Wu Invasion albums. In short, it's a money-making exercise with the Wu Tang Clan's names on it for publicity purposes Deletion of Wu-Invasion Mixtape Series: World Edition Volume 1 WP:NALBUM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +473 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of performances on Top of the Pops User:MacGyverMagic 09:19, 1 May 2009 (UTC) keep """Colonel Warden showed the sources exist. The need to provide the sources has been met; after that applies. That said, the list isn't actually complete. http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/music/newsid_1957000/1957665.stm When a TOTP producer said he hated S Club Juniors and didn't want to put them on the show, it was regarding their first single """"One Step Closer"""" which isn't listed. I have no idea if they actually performed Puppy Love on the show""" Deletion of List of performances on Top of the Pops WP:NODEADLINE Wikipedia:There is no deadline 81 +474 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robb Banks User:Gongshow 00:52, 4 September 2017 (UTC) keep There appear to be multiple examples of non-trivial coverage on this person's music, enough in my view to meet and . I have added references to the article Deletion of Robb Banks WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +475 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space (NewsRadio episode) User:Ckatz 01:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC) comment """Three of the four """"delete"""" supporters have used as their rationale for opposing the article. It should be noted that specifically states ''""""Avoid listing episodes for AfD unless they are completely unverifiable and original research.""""'' As this article is neither """"unverifiable"""" or """"original research"""", the only option would be a redirect - ''not'' deletion""" Deletion of Space (NewsRadio episode) WP:EPISODE||WP:EPISODE Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +476 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Barlock User:TonyTheTiger 19:43, 17 November 2016 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Ryan Barlock WP:NHOCKEY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +477 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SolidCAM User:Lahiru_k 07:50, 26 September 2007 (UTC) keep """Despite the issue this software seems notable to me. I got Results 691 - 698 of about 265,000 for """"SolidCAM """" in google.http://www.google.com/search?q=%22SolidCAM+%22&hl=en&rlz=1B2GGGL_enLK208LK208&start=720&sa=N But obviously this article needs some sources to verify the content""" Deletion of SolidCAM WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +478 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krabi International School User:Atlantic306 23:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC) keep minimal article and cites needed but degree issuing schools are usually kept as per Deletion of Krabi International School WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +479 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Moone User:South 02:52, 13 November 2009 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Charlie Moone WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +480 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shinigami (Bleach) (2nd nomination) User:Xymmax 16:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC) delete Great article, but its in the face of Wikipedia policy. Bleach is one of the ten most popular pages here, but this is OR, with no showing of real world notability, and written in an in-universe style. I personally like it, but I can't make it pass muster under . Additional comment. Having said all that, 6 weeks is pretty quick for a 2nd AfD. I know but I am concerned that we are destined to go through this process endlessly until we iron out exactly how applies to episodic programs Deletion of Shinigami (Bleach) (2nd nomination) WP:FICT||WP:CCC||WP:FICT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +481 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexuality in Star Trek (2nd nomination) User:Colonel 23:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC) keep The nomination seems counter-factual as the article contains sources such as ''Sexuality and Sex-Role Stereotyping in Star Trek'' which clearly support the topic. And the rest just seems to be the argument to avoid of which is not policy. And the article still has reasonable scope for improvement per our |editing policy. For example, the source ''http://www.jstor.org/pss/4239567 Sex and Star Trek'' hasn't been mentioned yet Deletion of Sexuality in Star Trek (2nd nomination) WP:WEDONTNEEDIT||WP:IMPERFECT Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +482 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shirli Kopelman User:Kj 15:56, 23 August 2020 (UTC) comment Regarding subject requests to delete a page, see , and Deletion of Shirli Kopelman WP:BIODEL||WP:BLPDEL||WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +483 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asumiko Nakamura User:Cavarrone 07:41, 29 May 2016 (UTC) keep per , after https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Asumiko_Nakamura&action=historysubmit&type=revision&diff=722455717&oldid=722390128 the expansion it is clear that the subject passes GNG and NAUTHOR. Worth reminding the nominator her works being ''currently'' redlinked in en.wikipedia does not mean they are non-notable, and authors/works which are notable in Japan are perfectly suitable for having articles in en.wiki Deletion of Asumiko Nakamura WP:HEY Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard 85 +484 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Olson (photographer) User:Xe7al 01:12, 23 February 2016 (UTC) delete This appears to be an obvious violation of since the page appears to have been created by Jake Olson himself. Additionally, this does not fit the requirements established by , specifically in regards to and Deletion of Jake Olson (photographer) WP:COI||WP:NOTE||WP:NTEMP||WP:SPIP Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +485 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Hassan Khan User:Z1720 23:02, 29 September 2020 (UTC) delete Fails and . A candidate for office does not automatically get notability and there are no sources that show . A search of Google, JSTOR, and Academic OneFile and newspaper databases did not produce additional results Deletion of Muhammad Hassan Khan WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +486 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public Information Research (2nd nomination) User:Hut 10:43, 17 July 2008 (UTC) delete no substantial coverage in third-party reliable sources, as demonstrated above. Fails abd Deletion of Public Information Research (2nd nomination) WP:N||WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +487 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin M. Connolly User:Malevious 19:17, 29 April 2007 (UTC) keep He's had many credits including that of a main character. That should be enough to satisfy . Just because you don't think doing dubbing of anime isn't notable doesn't mean it isn't. Please read up on the person before you nominate them for notability. --Malevious Deletion of Kevin M. Connolly WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +488 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cathy Day User:Alpha 16:08, 3 February 2012 (UTC) delete The subject lacks |significant coverage in |reliable third party sources, and appears to fail the |notability guidelines for biographies Deletion of Cathy Day WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +489 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanford Mendicants (2 nomination) User:TenPoundHammer 01:43, 9 August 2007 (UTC) keep easily passes Deletion of Stanford Mendicants (2 nomination) WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +490 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Legend of Zelda (Wii) (2nd nomination) User:Isotope23 17:04, 5 June 2006 (UTC) delete per nomination and a crystal ball clause. Existence is not verifiable. Also, it appears from the nom that a similar article was deleted last year? If this is the case and this is close enough to be a recreation, someone should consider a speedy delete under #G4 Deletion of The Legend of Zelda (Wii) (2nd nomination) WP:NOT||WP:CSD Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +491 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristina Pimenova User:Deathlibrarian 11:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC) delete """Fails Not notable - references seem to relate to the one event where she was called """"the most beuatiful girl in the world""" Deletion of Kristina Pimenova WP:NMODEL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +492 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenta Furube [[User_talk:ClubOranje|T]] 10:28, 2 June 2009 (UTC) delete per nom, fails in never having made the field, non notable per . --ClubOranje Deletion of Kenta Furube WP:ATHLETE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +493 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MusicMaster (music notation software) User:Haakon 18:55, 24 November 2009 (UTC) delete per nom; promotional for non-notable product by |SPA Deletion of MusicMaster (music notation software) WP:SPA Wikipedia:Single-purpose account 21 +494 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugene P. Watson User:Billy 21:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC) comment Really? Shouldn't the author creating a page review as well to ensure they are entering someone who would pass the test? Especially someone as prolific as Deletion of Eugene P. Watson WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +495 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 TTC subway murder User:Mhking 22:14, 21 April 2007 (UTC) delete violates Deletion of 2007 TTC subway murder WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +496 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robbie Sigurðsson NONE NONE keep subject passes . Sources in other languages are sufficient to demonstrate notability Deletion of Robbie Sigurðsson WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +497 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sakis Gouzonis User:Kosm1fent 07:12, 28 November 2011 (UTC) delete per nom. Fails and Deletion of Sakis Gouzonis WP:COMPOSER||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +498 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magdalena Zamolska User:Joseph2302 23:03, 27 April 2017 (UTC) keep This AfD is in bad faith from an editor trying to make a |point about the long standing notability consensuses of and Deletion of Magdalena Zamolska WP:POINT||WP:NCYCLING||WP:NSPORT Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +499 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N202LF User:Edtropolis 19:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC) keep Helicopters of that type meets criteria of otability. Needs improvement Deletion of N202LF WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +500 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaël Kakuta (2nd nomination) User:MotorsportPete93 16:38, 7 September 2009 (UTC) keep While he may not be notable yet under , he is still a notable person, even if it is only for one event, the media coverage is significant enough to warrant an article. He is not just another Chelsea youth player. He is more notable than Paul Pogba because the Pogba incident is just an allegation at the moment. Besides, Kakuta's was really the first of its kind - it sets a precedent for punishments and treatment of youngsters in the future. It has lead to discussions of banning transfers of Under-18s. It doesn't really matter what he is notable for, so long as he is notable Deletion of Gaël Kakuta (2nd nomination) WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +501 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birmingham Sailing Club User:Ammodramus 02:46, 27 April 2017 (UTC) delete Google and Google News searches turn up no independent in-depth coverage. Passing mentions, quotes from members, directory entries, and the club's own website, but nothing else. Fairly clear fail Deletion of Birmingham Sailing Club WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +502 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proposed United States purchase of Greenland User:TJRC 23:24, 16 August 2019 (UTC) keep At first blush, this looks like , as WilliamJE says. But really, even ignoring the current claim, the 1867 and 1946 proposals are sufficient to make this notable. They are interesting, worthy of historical study, well-documented, and covered in multiple reliable sources. In short, it's a great candidate for an article. We'll need to be careful that it isn't used to coat-rack in Trump ridicule, but that's an entirely different question. The fact that it's only coming to light as a ''result'' of the Trump thing does not disqualify it from being as a notable and article-worthy subject Deletion of Proposed United States purchase of Greenland WP:COATRACK Wikipedia:Coatrack articles 47 +503 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freshwater library User:RC 02:47, 5 April 2008 (UTC) delete no refs, |non-notable public place Deletion of Freshwater library WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +504 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jungjangbi Plaza User:MER 08:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC) delete no assertion of meeting Deletion of Jungjangbi Plaza WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +505 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UIU Electrical & Electronics Club User:SalmanZ 21:18, 17 August 2019 (UTC) delete Fails & Deletion of UIU Electrical & Electronics Club WP:ORG||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +506 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delhi School of Internet Marketing User:CaroleHenson 11:06, 1 December 2016 (UTC) delete WP:COI issues, fails Deletion of Delhi School of Internet Marketing WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +507 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winchester bus route 5 User:LibStar 06:28, 9 June 2009 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Winchester bus route 5 WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +508 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Posterrorism User:Catgirllover4ever 20:49, 31 March 2020 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Posterrorism WP:A7 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +509 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dirty Harry cast members User:Ajf773 17:30, 29 January 2018 (UTC) delete per . All cast lists are present on each films respective articles anyhow Deletion of List of Dirty Harry cast members WP:INDISCRIMINATE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +510 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger vs lion User:Cindamuse 13:54, 17 October 2010 (UTC) delete per . This one raised my eyebrows a tad bit. Honestly, my mama can take a tiger any day of the week. Word Deletion of Tiger vs lion WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +511 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amin Ellahi Shaikh User:EditorE 05:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC) delete as it seems the subject has yet to escape status Deletion of Amin Ellahi Shaikh WP:CRYSTALBALL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +512 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flexible contracts User:Wikicology 23:06, 13 May 2015 (UTC) keep Per |significant coverages In multiple independent |reliable sources https://www.google.co.uk/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%22Flexible+contracts%22&num=50&gws_rd=cr&ei=cddTVdf7HuTP7QaitoDgCA Deletion of Flexible contracts WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +513 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Dick User:WFCforLife 00:06, 24 July 2010 (UTC) merge I don't see this AfD as down to notability. In my opinion, Phil and Theleftorium have established beyond any doubt that this man is notable. But the decision on whether or not an individual should have a stand alone article should always boil down to whether or not it adds encyclopaedic value, |regardless of established conventions. If this is a reasonable summary of his life, and there are similar articles on similar people from the same company, coverage on both the company and the individual would be best served with a higher-quality, concentrated article, rather than having to click on multiple links for little snippets of the picture. For clarity, this content definitely warrants coverage on wikipedia. But as the article stands, a merge of some description seems a logical step Deletion of Edward Dick WP:IAR Wikipedia:Ignore all rules 63 +514 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of key MBTA bus routes User:Unscintillating 02:22, 26 December 2017 (UTC) keep nbsp; Merge was discussed and rejected back in 2008 on the talk page.  The point is not to say that this topic should or should not be merged, but that it is a violation of eletion policy to use EL8 to delete topics with merge targets, and there is no argument made here for IAR.  Deletion of List of key MBTA bus routes WP:D||WP:DEL8 Wikipedia:Disambiguation 64 +515 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biman Bangladesh Airlines Flight 60 User:Icewhiz 14:25, 13 May 2019 (UTC) keep per . The crash meets the essay (size, hull loss, injuries). An international passenger flight breaking up into 3 pieces on landing is far from routine. We had international coverage of this recent event, and at this point it is too soon to evaluate SUSTAINED Deletion of Biman Bangladesh Airlines Flight 60 WP:RAPID||WP:AIRCRASH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +516 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That's what she said (2nd nomination) User:Ryan 02:05, 28 July 2010 (UTC) comment """We have to come to some sort of consensus here - previously it was deleted unanimously (""""I don't believe usage in a TV show justifies having an article about this form of joke.""""); right now even with the mentioned sources (almost all of which don't actually directly discuss it, even the WP article mentioned above) it's barely going to be more then a dictionary defition; its already on en-wiktionary. If that's the case it needs to be merged or redirected into something more appropriate; if an actual SOURCED encyclopedia article (not with OR) can be made out of it that can get past a dictionary then it should be kept""" Deletion of That's what she said (2nd nomination) WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +517 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ice Age: Th4w User:Joe 00:40, 9 December 2009 (UTC) delete Per Deletion of Ice Age: Th4w WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +518 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venda Wikipedia User:Northamerica1000 07:27, 21 April 2017 (UTC) merge to List of Wikipedias as a valid search term (-R). Source searches are not providing any significant coverage in RS; fails Deletion of Venda Wikipedia WP:ATD||WP:N Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +519 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Géza von Neményi User:TSO1D 00:18, 8 December 2006 (UTC) delete Appears to be somewhat notable, having published a book and being mentioned in various articles, but probably still does not pass Deletion of Géza von Neményi WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +520 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L.E.F. Eden Garden Matriculation School User:Cordless 15:35, 30 November 2016 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of L.E.F. Eden Garden Matriculation School WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +521 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clara Chu User:Silver 19:32, 7 April 2010 (UTC) comment I have tagged this article for |rescue Deletion of Clara Chu WP:ARS Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron 46 +522 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auburn Avenue (publication) User:juliarulia NONE keep """I believe the articles referenced do suggest notability (to whatever subjective degree) and the stub should not be deleted. Stubs have room to grow and expand. Furthermore, I've come across dozens of stubs that don't have any references cited and they have not been recommended for deletion. To keep citing when only selected articles are being held to that standard is unfair. There's no required quantifiable amount of sources or coverage that constitutes """"significant coverage."""" To nit pit whether two cited independent sources actually mention the publication, when the sources are clearly recognizing and featuring its exclusive content, is also unfair. I still contend that there are no concrete identifiable grounds on which this stub should be deleted""" Deletion of Auburn Avenue (publication) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +523 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Parsons User:Bigdaddy1981 00:30, 28 May 2009 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Nathan Parsons WP:ENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +524 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajkumar Kanagasingam User:Ccscott 08:25, 18 March 2007 (UTC) keep As decided by the community less than three months ago, this subject is notable as he is discussed in multiple, non-trivial and independent published references (see Rajkumar Kanagasingam|here and Talk:Rajkumar Kanagasingam#References(off-line columns)|here) thus meeting the primary notability criteron of . I do not understand what has changed to necessitate another AfD so soon after the last one resulted in a Keep consensus Deletion of Rajkumar Kanagasingam WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +525 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In-N-Out Burger menu items User:Absurdist 05:20, 23 July 2007 (UTC) delete A menu is like a #DIR|sales catalog, and the article reads like a #HOWTO|how-to guide for ordering burgers Deletion of In-N-Out Burger menu items WP:NOT||WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +526 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloof User:PMDrive1061 23:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC) delete under - might not be vandalism, but it's certainly nonsense Deletion of Bloof WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +527 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Surface User:Michaelzeng7 23:44, 20 June 2012 (UTC) delete and Move Microsoft Surface (tablet) to here. Obviously the . There is even a hatnote at (tablet) for the PixelSense. Completely redundant disambiguation page Deletion of Microsoft Surface WP:PRIMARYTOPIC Wikipedia:Disambiguation 64 +528 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafael Leão User:Argyle 15:29, 29 August 2011 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Rafael Leão WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +529 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kids Next Door Sector V [[User talk:Yngvarr|Yng]][[Special:Contributions/Yngvarr|varr]] 19:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC) delete If you were to address the |guesses and suppositions of this article, you'd end up with pretty much nothing which isn't already contained in Codename: Kids Next Door Deletion of Kids Next Door Sector V WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +530 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biblical counseling NONE NONE keep It's all very well saying the argument is worthless, but there are numerous books and theses ''about'' the subject. Here are a few Deletion of Biblical counseling WP:GOOGLEHITS Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +531 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart Harvey User:Quantpole 12:48, 25 January 2010 (UTC) delete Does not meet and searching does not come up with anything to meet Deletion of Stuart Harvey WP:ATH||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +532 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018–19 The New Saints F.C. season User:The 05:03, 1 December 2018 (UTC) delete per nomination. Subject fails . |Just another item for Wikipedia's rather long and getting longer by the day indiscriminate listings of information Deletion of 2018–19 The New Saints F.C. season WP:NSEASON||WP:INDISCRIMINATE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +533 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raja salesh mandir User:Newshunter12 05:36, 28 October 2018 (UTC) delete This article fails because it lacks even the coverage to create an article about the topic, let alone have enough to prove notability. I am also troubled by the naked COI editing described above, which adds to the need to remove this article, since such conduct shouldn't be rewarded Deletion of Raja salesh mandir WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE||WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +534 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AAPLAC User:MER 05:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of AAPLAC WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +535 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron-Robert Zieler (2nd nomination) User:Baileypalblue 12:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC) delete per nom, possibly '''speedy delete''' #General|G4. I haven't seen the original article, but it sounds as though it was re-created in substantially the same form without addressing the rationale for deletion in the first AfD Deletion of Ron-Robert Zieler (2nd nomination) WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +536 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nil Eryılmaz User:Papaursa 03:02, 22 August 2017 (UTC) delete Does not meet or . Routine sports coverage (which is all that is provided) is insufficient to meet Deletion of Nil Eryılmaz WP:NHOCKEY||WP:NSPORTS||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +537 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National team appearances in the UEFA Women's Championship User:Fenix 09:33, 16 February 2013 (UTC) delete as clear |Stat Attack. Besides, isn't all this information available in other articles and has just been combined here in a series of tables, the selection of whch seems to be entirely arbitrary and therefore unencyclopaedic Deletion of National team appearances in the UEFA Women's Championship WP:NOTSTATS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +538 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Thein User:MelanieN 01:04, 18 December 2011 (UTC) delete """Sounds like an up-and-coming young man, but it's a case of . Maybe he will go on to greater heights than representative on a small munipical council and officer in a youth organization. If so, we can have an article about him then. BTW I see that the author of the article, in removing the PROD, said he is on the council of """"one of the biggest municipalities in Luxembourg"""". That may be so, but it still took only 403 votes to elect him. Per he will have to achieve national office before he gets an article here""" Deletion of Joe Thein WP:TOOSOON||WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +539 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lenny Veltman User:BryanG 19:34, 13 April 2009 (UTC) merge to The Apprentice (U.S. season 5). Just being a contestant isn't enough for a stand-alone article per , and he doesn't appear to be notable for anything else, but as suggested there a redirect is perfectly acceptable and helps get readers to the relevant season article Deletion of Lenny Veltman WP:ONEEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +540 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Appiah User:Knox490 03:49, 1 September 2019 (UTC) keep """I agree with User: RebeccaGreen who wrote: """"...added some more sources and information... There is enough coverage about her to meet ."""" In some cases it is better to upgrade and source an article rather than be quick to try to delete it. Many of the AfD nominations could be completely avoided if people did this. So much drama and unproductive work could be avoided if more editors were like User: RebeccaGreen. Also, User:Senegambianamestudy made a strong argument. Namely, User:Senegambianamestudy wrote: """" plenty of reliable sources that establishes notability https://www.blackenterprise.com/face2face-africa-young-innovators-publish-new-magazine/, https://thegrio.com/2013/01/24/young-africans-in-america-on-a-mission-to-rebrand-homeland/, https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:olfZN27k_KkJ:https://www.bet.com/news/lifestyle/2013/01/17/bet-com-chats-with-face-2-face-africa-magazine-creators.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk a catched copy of a 2013 interview by BET, http://madame.lefigaro.fr/societe/sandra-appiah-25-ans-entrepreneuse-060315-95141, and one of the https://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/business/12-Ghanaians-named-among-2019-100-Most-Influential-People-of-African-Descent-under-40-761618# Most Influential People of African Descent (MIPAD) as well as https://www.pulse.com.gh/news/business/ceo-of-afro-arab-group-ranked-among-50-young-ceos-in-ghana-2018/tx47y1j one of the top 50 CEOs in Ghana."""" After all is said and done there is sufficient depth and breadth of coverage to keep the article. Finally, doing business is very challenging in many parts of Africa due to excessive regulation and that it is a developing country.https://triblive.com/opinion/john-stossel-in-africa-bad-law-keeps-people-poor/ So why make it harder on her? I think it is great that she has an article and I find her work admirable. She could have done business in the USA easily, but she chose the tougher path. But I am sure it is very rewarding for her (I know a couple of people who have done business in Africa and it rewarding to make a poor country more prosperous""" Deletion of Sandra Appiah WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +541 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LOL (Internet slang) User:Onorem 12:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC) keep First of all, the article has citations. Secondly, #I don't like it|I don't like it isn't a very good argument for deletion Deletion of LOL (Internet slang) WP:ILIKEIT Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +542 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Srdjan Rajsic User:PJM 17:40, 12 November 2005 (UTC) delete per nom. Nice resume, but NN per Deletion of Srdjan Rajsic WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +543 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live Armageddon User:Esradekan 01:43, 8 April 2009 (UTC) delete fails notability per #Albums. No significant coverage in |reliable, third-party, sources Deletion of Live Armageddon WP:MUSIC||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +544 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crowd Linguistics: Rugby User:Dhartung 02:47, 28 April 2007 (UTC) delete WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, even when that information is true and attributable to |reliable sources. In the last AFD, I told you ''It wasn't your fault that it was misnamed, it was the fault of the person who made that request. Nevertheless, while we appreciate your efforts to fulfill that request, editors here are arguing that the topic is not needed. In many cases it is permissible to create a stub article for a notable topic that may grow in time, but in this case we probably don't need a local slang directory pertaining to a specific sport.'' Other editors did suggest a rename if the article were kept. The name '''was not a reason for deletion Deletion of Crowd Linguistics: Rugby WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +545 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hantamaru Ririku User:ColourBurst 14:22, 28 August 2006 (UTC) delete fan fan anity fan. Oh yeah, extremely overpowered as well Deletion of Hantamaru Ririku WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +546 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lewis Stanson User:Prewitt81 03:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Lewis Stanson WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +547 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint-Tropez (song) User:Mustapha 09:29, 12 September 2019 (UTC) keep Saw the video and it has up to 1.2M views on YouTube in just 12 hours. The song is by a notable musician Post Malone and shouldn't be deleted. With the views alone and the notability of the artist, it sure passes Deletion of Saint-Tropez (song) WP:NSONG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +548 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Ilyas (cricketer, born 1996) User:Riteboke 16:18, 13 April 2021 (UTC) keep per Deletion of Mohammad Ilyas (cricketer, born 1996) WP:NCRIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +549 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monaken Lodge User:Dhartung 22:35, 23 February 2008 (UTC) delete per . We have Order of the Arrow, but we don't even have articles on scouting units below the national level, e.g. Scouting in the United States. As to the claim of notability, the awards it has won are not independent of scouting Deletion of Monaken Lodge WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +550 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jane Speed User:Qworty 06:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC) delete """for failing and . I wish we could delete it for its lousy writing style: """"It was in the late fall of 1948 that she consulted with her long-beloved husband and took the momentous decision to pluck her eyebrows fortnightly."""" If there's such a thing as a writing gene, he sure didn't inherit it from his pretty mom, rest her soul""" Deletion of Jane Speed WP:AUTHOR||WP:BK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +551 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jetman (video game) User:Billscottbob 03:45, 10 January 2008 (UTC) comment This game is one of the most popular Facebook applications today. I would say Keep per and but on the other hand facebook applications hardly have enough history and dynamicism to warrant its own article, so maybe Merge and Redirect would be more appropriate Deletion of Jetman (video game) WP:POTENTIAL||WP:N Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state 6 +552 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarvuism User:Cosmic 16:28, 14 October 2008 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Tarvuism WP:NFT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +553 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Challenges Foundation User:GrapefruitSculpin 01:19, 22 October 2017 (UTC) keep """Additional sources showing clearance of found from the https://www.hhs.se/en/outreach/sse-initiatives/global-challenges/ Stockholm School of Economics, an additional http://news.trust.org/item/20170523230148-a90de Reuters article, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/feb/18/artificial-intelligence-nanotechnology-risks-human-civilisation The Guardian and the http://carnegieeurope.eu/2017/06/27/global-challenges-when-corruption-is-operating-system-event-5633 Carnegie Endowment. The company they hired for their brand identity describes what they've done rather clearly: """"Our work with the Global Challenges Foundation has centred around their complex report; 12 Risks that threaten human civilisation."""" - http://bwa.design/clients/global-challenges-foundation?page=1 here. I'll edit the article to include these and soften the modest tone""" Deletion of Global Challenges Foundation WP:GNG||WP:PROMO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +554 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tin House, Arizona User:Lightburst 20:27, 11 May 2020 (UTC) delete Does not pass Deletion of Tin House, Arizona WP:GEOLAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +555 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Kincaid User:Theroadislong 09:13, 29 July 2020 (UTC) keep seems to pass and director of notable films Robot Holocaust and ''Breeders (film)|Breeders Deletion of Tim Kincaid WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +556 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Christopher User:Worldbruce 12:41, 28 October 2019 (UTC) comment The interview without independent analysis in self-published zagsblog.com is a poor source for establishing notability, but there is an piece in ''The Atlantic'' that goes beyond coverage.https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/10/can-josh-christopher-fix-what-ails-college-sports/599224 Deletion of Josh Christopher WP:ROUTINE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +557 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SmartRecruiters User:K 05:03, 3 May 2018 (UTC) delete None of the sources meet . For example, Forbes is forbes.com/site which is a user submitted area, not editorial content; possibly a promo placement. Techcrunch is way too indiscriminate to count towards notability in tech. The rest of the sources are likewise non-independent / Deletion of SmartRecruiters WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:SPIP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +558 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homeworkgate User:Colapeninsula 11:22, 8 April 2014 (UTC) merge to Australian cricket team in India in 2012–13. No evidence that this meets notability requirements for events (): events need to have lasting impact and more than a few days' press coverage. Some content could be merged but not sure it's necessary Deletion of Homeworkgate WP:EVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +559 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassey Ho (2nd nomination) User:The 07:35, 28 April 2014 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Cassey Ho (2nd nomination) WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +560 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamen Rider Femme User:Active 21:30, 7 September 2010 (UTC) delete or merge, but there being no sourced, third party content, there is nothing to merge) fails no non-trivial third party content. Special:Contributions/Active_Banana|''Active Deletion of Kamen Rider Femme WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +561 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freespace Collective User:Coredesat 20:28, 23 June 2006 (UTC) delete per |CSD:A7. There is absolutely no notability here Deletion of Freespace Collective WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +562 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Network Bank User:Raykyogrou0 09:17, 16 January 2014 (UTC) comment """The comments saying """"Speedy Keep"""" or """"Close"""" are not actual |speedy keep criterion""" Deletion of One Network Bank WP:SK Wikipedia:Speedy keep 86 +563 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Statue of Thomas Cass User:Ad 03:40, 10 October 2019 (UTC) keep There are a large number of sources that discuss the subject, although some are brief. The subject is a well known artistic object within a nationally recognized historic site. While good faith is not in doubt, the nomination appears to have been premature and done without due regard for . I would encourage the OP to withdraw their nomination Deletion of Statue of Thomas Cass WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +564 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Demartini User:Nonstopdrivel 03:48, 18 June 2007 (UTC) delete This article doesn't pass , much less . It's poorly written and has a distinctly unencyclopedic, whimsical tone. Paul Bragg is himself well known in the health-food industry, but his notability isn't transferable to Mr. Demartini. The latter, I'm guessing, gave a testimonial in one of Mr. Bragg's videos Deletion of John Demartini WP:POV||WP:NOTABLE Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +565 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Eberhart User:Coolabahapple 06:32, 18 March 2020 (UTC) delete does not meet , of initial concern was single digit/zero library holdings (via WorldCat ie. https://www.worldcat.org/title/granny-goes-to-the-zoo/oclc/251338051&referer=brief_results ''The Adventures of Granny: Granny Goes to the Zoo'' one library, and a gsearch brings up just the usual book selling sites but |no reviews Deletion of Nancy Eberhart WP:NAUTHOR||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +566 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hema Sinha User:CaliforniaAliBaba 00:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC) keep """per Avineshjose. And second Prosfilaes' comment. If a topic has potential sources to build an article, then we http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hema_Sinha&diff=prev&oldid=192684520 add them to the article, not wikilawyer it to death. Furthermore, there's no requirement in that someone """"establish notability as an X""""; notability is presumed from coverage. The idea that someone has to have """"fame and importance"""" in order to have a Wikipedia article was rejected long ago""" Deletion of Hema Sinha WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +567 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michi-chan User:EdJohnston 02:30, 30 April 2008 (UTC) delete Touring, awards, or releases on major labels: these are things that can show notability under . I don't see any of those here Deletion of Michi-chan WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +568 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Kautz User:TenPoundHammer 02:18, 7 December 2008 (UTC) delete Utterly fails Deletion of Adam Kautz WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +569 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pokemon Nice Cards User:Husond 18:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC) delete Unsourced, poorly written |original research Deletion of List of Pokemon Nice Cards WP:NOR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +570 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The New Cinema User:Metropolitan90 16:47, 21 October 2010 (UTC) delete No |independent reliable sources have been provided to help establish this publication's notability. Furthermore, the article appears to be promotional rather than taking a |neutral point of view Deletion of The New Cinema WP:RS||WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +571 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ammar Campa-Najjar (3rd nomination) User:Magnolia677 23:31, 9 March 2020 (UTC) delete Fails and . I was unable to locate any significant biographical details, except for several mentions of him regarding the election. A bit too soon Deletion of Ammar Campa-Najjar (3rd nomination) WP:BASIC||WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +572 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zackary (2017 film) User:Donaldd23 23:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC) delete Fails , minor award not enough to satisfy guidelines Deletion of Zackary (2017 film) WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +573 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephano Barberis User:FisherQueen 22:41, 18 June 2010 (UTC) delete unless better sources become available. Many of the claimed awards are awards for videos he worked on- not awards that he himself was awarded. Most of the awards are purely regional in scope; this person's sole claim to notability is the Video Director of the Year awards in 2007 and 2008 from the Canadian Country Music Association, but as far as I can determine, those awards weren't reported on by any |independent sources. ''None'' of the biographical information in the article is verified in any independent sources Deletion of Stephano Barberis WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +574 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wendy Barrie-Wilson User:MurderByDeadcopy 21:54, 25 January 2016 (UTC) keep passes . Article needs a rewrite though Deletion of Wendy Barrie-Wilson WP:ARTIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +575 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/24 season 6 episodes User:Ned 23:49, 30 January 2007 (UTC) delete maybe merge'', per Chuq and other concerns. While I'm usually not a fan of individual episode articles anyways, Chuq is right in that the unique nature of 24 makes these types of articles just stupid (even if you love episode articles, why organize the plot summary like this?). This same logic can be applied to the reason I normally (but certainly not always) discourage individual episode articles, the individual episodes are not independently notable nor do they need to be split for page size concerns. It's this kind of preemptive article creation that leads to the massive misconception about episode articles. #IINFO #7, we are not plot summaries, and other uses of plot summary don't need this kind of formatting. It's being done just because that's what someone did for other episode articles. These episodes, aired or not, shouldn't be formatted this way, even if you like episode articles Deletion of 24 season 6 episodes WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +576 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doomsday Prophecy User:IJBall 14:44, 30 June 2021 (UTC) delete Outside of ''Sharknado'', almost no Syfy Saturday night TV movie is going to pass //. The article's current two sources don't get it there Deletion of Doomsday Prophecy WP:GNG||WP:NFILM||WP:TVSHOW Wikipedia:Notability 71 +577 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Haine User:Cinderella157 02:22, 12 May 2019 (UTC) comment """Probably meets but not wrt award and rank - the latter has arguably a higher threshold but does not preclude notability for other reasons. requires """"significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources"""". A full obituary in the Times carries weight, even if it is otherwise a little weak on sources. The subject is ''at'' the threshold I think. Therefore happy with a decision to '''keep'''. Regards""" Deletion of Richard Haine WP:ANYBIO||WP:SOLDIER||WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +578 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bright Commodity Broker User:Ioannes 21:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC) delete does not assert notability according Deletion of Bright Commodity Broker WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +579 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killarney Celtic User:Fenix 15:49, 29 January 2015 (UTC) delete Non-notable team. Never played in a national competition per Deletion of Killarney Celtic WP:FOOTYN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +580 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reuben Haines III User:Coolabahapple 16:14, 22 July 2016 (UTC) delete does not meet , sources found just have trivial mentions, subject is already covered at Wyck House Deletion of Reuben Haines III WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +581 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Long Sight User:Pburka 01:26, 12 July 2013 (UTC) delete per , Deletion of Long Sight WP:NFILM||WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +582 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paula Fatic User:pd_THOR 17:46, 7 August 2006 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Paula Fatic WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +583 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Henderson (doctor) User:Dirtlawyer1 17:37, 23 August 2014 (UTC) keep Notable British/Australian motor vehicle and traffic safety expert and published author. His early and significant involvement in automobile safety issues has had a lasting impact on the design of racing and passenger cars, including seat belt design and the enactment of mandatory seat belt laws in Australia, the United States and elsewhere, and leading to significant cultural changes in the Anglosphere regarding driving safety. The present footnoted sources in the article are more than sufficient to demonstrate significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources to satisfy the general notability guidelines per . Yes, the subject is a little bit obscure, no, the subject is not a household word, but this is exactly the sort of well-sourced biographical article that Wikipedia should have if it claims to be a serious encyclopedia Deletion of Michael Henderson (doctor) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +584 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black by Popular Demand User:Esradekan 08:26, 12 July 2008 (UTC) delete article fails to establish notability as per #Albums Deletion of Black by Popular Demand WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +585 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/February 15, 2003 anti-war protest User:Fuhghettaboutit 05:02, 30 April 2006 (UTC) keep """I too think this is a violation of , as the stated argument for nomination is so specious. By the way, listing elbow licking, which is stated by Guiness to be a myth, """"so stop telling us about it"""", is really not a very effective way of attacking Guiness' certification that the protest ''was indeed a world record breaker''. You grok""" Deletion of February 15, 2003 anti-war protest WP:POINT Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +586 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Torto User:JohnCD 16:38, 26 February 2014 (UTC) delete per Lankiveil and Deletion of Robert Torto WP:PERP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +587 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Charlie's prostitution of a child User:Softlavender 05:51, 9 May 2015 (UTC) delete Even the lead asserts no notability whatsoever. Delete per , not-notable, one event, . Most of the coverage in the majority of citations is barely a paragraph in length. This article creator seems sadly bent on creating massive walls of text about insignificant localized events concerning prostitution, events which are better suited for a single journalism article or blog post, not for an encyclopedia. There is nothing remotely encyclopedically relevant in this article, in my opinion Deletion of Stephen Charlie's prostitution of a child WP:ROUTINE||WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +588 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starmax User:MichaelQSchmidt 22:22, 21 February 2015 (UTC) keep per having sourcable notability, |even if in Korean. I would suggest the new editor who chose to nominate this perhaps gain a bit more experience and work on his |reserach skills before sending topics to AFD Deletion of Starmax WP:NONENG||WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +589 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm Only A Woman User:Sgeureka 14:10, 13 May 2008 (UTC) delete If the author didn't write this story himself (), it is a copyright violation (). &ndash Deletion of I'm Only A Woman WP:MADEUP||WP:COPYVIO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +590 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wako-Pro World Grand Prix 2011: Hungary vs Croatia (2nd nomination) User:Papaursa 23:17, 23 March 2012 (UTC) delete I'm not sure is the right reference, but is. Also, the kickboxing notability guidelines indicate that an event should be on the scale of the K-1 individual world championships to be truly notable, while this event is very minor. It was to be part of an 8 nation tournament, but they couldn't get enough countries interested, so they cancelled the tournament and held some individual matches Deletion of Wako-Pro World Grand Prix 2011: Hungary vs Croatia (2nd nomination) WP:MMAEVENT||WP:EVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +591 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monday Night Football all-time team standings (2nd nomination) User:Ajf773 15:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC) delete as and . Non encyclopedic list Deletion of Monday Night Football all-time team standings (2nd nomination) WP:LISTCRUFT||WP:NOR Wikipedia:Listcruft 66 +592 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis Guma User:GiantSnowman 09:54, 8 September 2011 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Dennis Guma WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +593 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Iris User:Pdcook 16:54, 7 May 2010 (UTC) delete I don't see how this band passes . Internet searches seem to bring up mostly social networking sites, but certainly no coverage in RS Deletion of Dark Iris WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +594 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marjan Bojadziev User:Qrsdogg 00:21, 27 May 2011 (UTC) keep Looks like there is a clear case that he meets Deletion of Marjan Bojadziev WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +595 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World of Warcraft Launcher User:Percy 10:36, 2 March 2008 (UTC) delete One wiki entry isn't substantial secondary coverage. Fails Deletion of World of Warcraft Launcher WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +596 """Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The CIA, al-Qaeda, and the """"war on terror""""""" User:Doc 15:13, 13 September 2008 (UTC) delete WP:SOAP|Soapy #OR|personal essay """Deletion of The CIA, al-Qaeda, and the """"war on terror""""""" WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +597 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy the Gypsy User:The 10:47, 29 June 2007 (UTC) delete Definitely a hoax, seems to be something made up in school or work one day, not a single |source or actual information to make it satisfy the |notability guideline Deletion of Jimmy the Gypsy WP:V||WP:NN Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +598 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1352 Wawel User:Praemonitus 18:47, 11 May 2015 (UTC) merge per : only one photometry study found; there's insufficient references to build a decent article Deletion of 1352 Wawel WP:DWMP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +599 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Musardo User:Joaquin008 20:40, 3 May 2013 (UTC) delete as fails Deletion of Ivan Musardo WP:NMMA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +600 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loreen Hall User:Sro23 19:35, 3 April 2018 (UTC) keep I can't help but sympathize when someone who asks for BLPREQUESTDELETE, and though I don't see anything defamatory or libelous in the article I can understand privacy concerns, but per there's no way the subject ''is not'' notable for Wikipedia Deletion of Loreen Hall WP:NOLYMPICS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +601 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unbox Therapy User:Mle 15:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC) comment ThePlatypusofDoom, I agree that applies to the original Article marked here for deletion, but seems off topic for this discussion as it would normally apply to the Wikipedia article in question for deletion rather than this particular discussion on whether to keep the article Deletion of Unbox Therapy WP:WAX||WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +602 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agonist (Christian) User:Squeamish 20:39, 16 October 2012 (UTC) delete """There are some uses of the phrase """"Christian agonist"""" in reliable sources, often in reference to Milton. On the other hand, that's not what this article is about. What this article ''is'' about is a |fringe |synthesis of religious topics. Some of this material is derived from http://www.christian-agonist.com www.christian-agonist.com (and, indeed, that appears as an external link). This article doesn't link to http://agon.us agon.us, but some of the contributor's other work clearly derives from it. Someone with some familiarity with the broader Christian topics may need to review the contributions of {{user|All Worlds}}; there is related material at Agon, Cafeteria Christianity, Saulieu and probably more that seems dubious at best, and I have substantial concerns about much of Sacred cockfight. I don't see anything in a reliable source to support any of this""" Deletion of Agonist (Christian) WP:FRINGE||WP:SYN Wikipedia:Fringe theories 44 +603 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grace Kingston McLeod User:Eusebeus 18:44, 28 March 2008 (UTC) delete per . No assertion of real-world significance Deletion of Grace Kingston McLeod WP:FICT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +604 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atta ur Rehman Khan [[User talk:86.17.222.157|talk]]) 17:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC) delete Nobody has come up with, and I can't find, any evidence that the subject might pass or the WP:general notability guideline|general notability guideline. Special:Contributions/86.17.222.157|86.17.222.157 Deletion of Atta ur Rehman Khan WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +605 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TIME Fibre Broadband User:Lemongirl942 09:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC) delete Sourced or not, this is simply advertising. No claim of significance here and doesn't satisfy Deletion of TIME Fibre Broadband WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +606 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Judaism User:Jayjg 21:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC) delete """This is a completely non-encyclopedic article, and I have a hard time imagining how an expansion would improve it. It's a hodge-podge of random negative thoughts, most of them having nothing to do with Judaism, and consisting almost entirely of |original research. If the other """"Criticism of """" articles are like this, then they should be deleted too""" Deletion of Criticism of Judaism WP:NOR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +607 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windows Odyssey (2nd nomination) User:MichaelQSchmidt 05:19, 6 January 2010 (UTC) keep """Puppets are dealt with by blocking. Article issues are dealt with through editing. Having giving thought to the comments here, the |potential this article has for |improvement, and in consideration of a brief serach http://www.google.com/search?q=Windows+Odyssey&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.microsoft:en-US&ie=utf8&oe=utf8, http://books.google.com/books?um=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Windows%20Odyssey%22&sa=N&tab=np, http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Windows+Odyssey%22&sa=X&oi=print_back, I have struck my """"merge"""" up above. Now the the article belongs to Wikipedia, I believe it can be improved through |regular editing. With respects, the GNG is a guideline, used by default when it seems applicable, but it will not and does not apply to all subjects. The notability of an idea or concept is not judged by the same criteria as notability for an person or a film. Further research in archives and technical journals not available online would be reasonable and prudent. Surmountable issues are never proper cause for deletion""" Deletion of Windows Odyssey (2nd nomination) WP:POTENTIAL||WP:IMPROVE||WP:ATD Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state 6 +608 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yung Mercury (rapper) User:Accounting4Taste 15:48, 24 March 2010 (UTC) delete """There's even less here than there was before, and the previous situation didn't meet either. """"Might be notable one day but not now"""" sums it up. Until then, given that this failed AfD about a week ago, I recommend SALT; at that hypothetical future point of notability, I think eletion review should be required. (added later) SALT the whole mess. The last AfD noted a number of """"album"""" titles and details that were simply hoaxes -- this seems to be the same""" Deletion of Yung Mercury (rapper) WP:MUSIC||WP:D Wikipedia:Notability 71 +609 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Page (MCC cricketer) (2nd nomination) User:Joseph2302 17:09, 18 December 2018 (UTC) delete as per nom, not played in a FC match. And fails as well Deletion of Page (MCC cricketer) (2nd nomination) WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +610 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC Fight Night: Stevenson vs Guillard User:Djohns21 22:09, 1 August 2011 (UTC) delete """I think there is a lot of confusion on whether or not a martial arts event is notable. To begin with, states that individual events are ''not'' notable. Even though I would delete this one, I disagree that there should be a blanket ban every event. I would propose the following guidelines: Events that meet are notable. (This would require coverage ''outside'' of martial arts sources) Events are notable if a title is at stake. Finally, if a group of events are qualifiers for a notable event, such as in a tournament, they are notable as a group. Otherwise, the just aren't notable. Lets be honest, UFC 9 was entertaining, but it doesn't matter. No titles changed hands, no one died, the matches are not the defining moment of any of these fighters lives. We need to have a community wide discussion where we discuss exactly what notability should be for Martial Arts (that doesn't consist of a slugging match between people who think that every match is noteworthy and people who think that no event is """"encyclopedic"""") , but until we do I'm gonna say delete on this one""" Deletion of UFC Fight Night: Stevenson vs Guillard WP:MMANOT||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +611 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nipple-Touch Mini User:Youremyjuliet 01:42, 19 October 2005 (UTC) comment Ah ha! Thank you, Llywrch. Even if we get over-ruled, you're really right about everything else. I hope this gets to at least have a chance... Or maybe keeping it afloat on a |BJAODN page would help it last long enough to be undeleted Deletion of Nipple-Touch Mini WP:BJAODN Wikipedia:Silly Things 52 +612 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Kinetic (comics) User:Darkknight2149 02:08, 14 October 2020 (UTC) comment While the |poor writing is certainly a problem, I'm not seeing a |criteria for deletion cited here. Did the article fail a source check (otability)? Is the implication that the subject of the article is a fan theory or hoax Deletion of The Kinetic (comics) WP:INUNIVERSE||WP:DELREASON||WP:N Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +613 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of dictators (2nd nomination) User:Czello 07:42, 29 May 2021 (UTC) delete as above. Seems very arbitrary, not a single citation to be found. Pure Deletion of List of dictators (2nd nomination) WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +614 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janne Wallenius User:Joe 06:01, 14 January 2017 (UTC) keep Many well-cited papers, a Scopus h-index of 21 and lots of GBooks hits suggest the subject passes #C1, although physics is a high-citation field and he doesn't appear to hit any of the other criteria. Similarly he seems to be mentioned a lot in the news, particularly in relation to his start up, which may scrape past /. Not super convincing in isolation but I think taken together these demonstrate notability. The issue of promotional content has evidently already been fixed. –  Deletion of Janne Wallenius WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +615 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Schuck User:JFHJr 03:41, 28 September 2011 (UTC) delete Having cleaned up the article for several blatant problems with basic guidelines for encyclopedic articles (, , , , to name a few) notability isn't met at this time. Even the subject's involvement in a startup company or a development team needs to be underpinned by notability. It looks like only Google has it, and that doesn't approach the guidelines: 1) not to be overly cynical, but we only have Google to cite, which is |problematic; and 2) we still don't have multiple, reliable, third party sources on the subject Deletion of Adam Schuck WP:NN||WP:BIO||WP:SOURCE||WP:BLP||WP:SOURCE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +616 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Medice User:StewdioMACK 04:23, 20 March 2018 (UTC) delete Does not pass and seems to be the musician himself editing Deletion of Christian Medice WP:MUS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +617 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social verbs User:Greenrd 23:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC) delete this is more of a glossary entry than an article, so it fails Deletion of Social verbs WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +618 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyy Black (porn star) User:LaMenta3 21:04, 23 March 2007 (UTC) comment """While I happen to agree with this particular nom, they are in no way """"flocking"""" to WP...many of the porn star articles up for AfD today were nominated by the same person within the span of a couple of hours as a suspected means of making a """ Deletion of Skyy Black (porn star) WP:POINT Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +619 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christianity and the Rwandan Genocide User:Markeer 15:59, 8 August 2007 (UTC) delete for underlying POV and I suspect . The underlying assumption of the article (typified by the title) is that Christianity as a whole bears a responsibility based on the actions of a few members (e.g. the clerics in Rwanda mentioned in the article). As the nom mentions there is a section of the main article addressing Christianity, this article would be redundant even if it weren't of extremely questionable POV Deletion of Christianity and the Rwandan Genocide WP:POINT Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +620 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Zionist proposals for alternative Jewish homelands User:IZAK 08:01, 6 February 2014 (UTC) merge to Proposals for a Jewish state by removing all duplicate and non-NPOV material and retaining whatever is worthwhile in this clear violation of Deletion of Anti-Zionist proposals for alternative Jewish homelands WP:POVFORK Wikipedia:Content forking 33 +621 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MediaMan (2nd nomination) NONE NONE keep Due to the following reviews, I believe it passes and Deletion of MediaMan (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:NWEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +622 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Mcleod user:Alf_photoman 20:14, 13 March 2007 (UTC) delete no matter whether hoax or not, fails , and probably Deletion of Paul Mcleod WP:A||WP:V||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Attribution 34 +623 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U.S. intervention in Venezuela User:Lubbad85 02:07, 30 April 2019 (UTC) keep I agree with Dream Focus that reliable sources are covering this event so it passes . and come to mind Deletion of U.S. intervention in Venezuela WP:GNG||WP:ATD||WP:NOTCLEANUP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +624 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Hanson User:Edison 12:01, 24 June 2007 (UTC) delete as failing , as per Deletion of Johnny Hanson WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +625 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shikha Khanduja Kaul User:Harshil169 09:16, 24 July 2019 (UTC) delete No reference in . Fails otability Deletion of Shikha Khanduja Kaul WP:RS||WP:N Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +626 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajay Kapur User:Ajf773 23:38, 6 November 2019 (UTC) delete Hardly remarkable. Fails Deletion of Ajay Kapur WP:NBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +627 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry P. Gamble User:Ejgreen77 03:35, 4 February 2015 (UTC) comment First of all, I am not an expert on this era of college football, at all. But, the inbox for this guy states that he was an College Football All-Southern Team|All-Southern selection in 1926. Based on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football/Archive 14#Category:All-Southern_college_football_players|this prior discussion, it appears that during the era this guy played, being an All-Southern selection was the historical equivalent of being named an All-American. If that's true, wouldn't that then qualify to meet Deletion of Harry P. Gamble WP:NCOLLATH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +628 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MSTRKRFT User:Doc 13:33, 21 October 2008 (UTC) keep Meets the following criterion: 1 (several references provided at the bottom of article), 5 (signed to Last Gang Records), 6 (Jesse Keeler, a member of the notable dance-punk group Death from Above 1979 is a member) and 8 (won a Juno Award Deletion of MSTRKRFT WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +629 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alif Hilmi Azmir User:Scopecreep 10:08, 27 March 2012 (UTC) delete per nomination: it's an autobiography of a student, and while his record sounds very nice, even if it's true it wouldn't make him notable enough for inclusion under Deletion of Alif Hilmi Azmir WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +630 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of landmarks User:Secret 02:32, 18 July 2012 (UTC) delete do not split or disambiguation. Landmark is such a vague term it violates |our policies in original research, and |neutral point of view Deletion of List of landmarks WP:NOR||WP:NPOV Wikipedia:No original research 12 +631 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Francis Doherty User:Mandsford 22:25, 13 January 2011 (UTC) delete Well, it happened http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F60D15FD3E5D1A7A93C7A9178CD85F468285F9, http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=4gIbAAAAIBAJ&sjid=vEkEAAAAIBAJ&pg=2677,4779845&dq=doherty+india&hl=en. However, I reached the same conclusion that LibStar did-- this didn't go beyond the news into -- http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=doherty+india+1921&scoring=a&sa=N&sugg=d&as_ldate=1920&as_hdate=1929&lnav=hist1. In fact, the name didn't even come back into the news when Colonel Singh made his allegations in 2004. For an American killed by hostile natives on foreign soil, there was surprisingly little reaction in the U.S. press. If Wikipedia had existed in 1922, would this have been considered notable? I don't think so. Not notable then, not notable now Deletion of William Francis Doherty WP:EVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +632 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eurofins Scientific User:Northamerica1000 17:39, 25 October 2012 (UTC) comment """This company passes per the independent sources comprised of significant coverage about it that were added to the article by User:Tijfo098. Regarding the nomination for deletion being partially based upon the article being unsourced at the time of its nomination, please note that per , topic notability is not correlated with whether or not articles have sources in them: """"The absence of citations in an article (as distinct from the non-existence of sources) does not indicate that the subject is not notable."""" See and for further information""" Deletion of Eurofins Scientific WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NRVE||WP:N||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +633 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyy Black (porn star) User:Edison 16:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC) delete Apparently promoters and fanciers of pornography have established a guideline to create an easy route for promoting such performers via the high web presence of Wikipedia. This article has no independent sources at all, and thus should be deleted because it fails and Deletion of Skyy Black (porn star) WP:PORNBIO||WP:ATT||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +634 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gigablast (2nd nomination) User:Unforgettableid 18:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC) delete This article was copied into mainspace by Wiki12rt, a |single-purpose account (SPA) almost surely affiliated with Gigablast. The |COI SPA has violated Wikipedia community norms both while putting the article into mainspace and afterwards. The article needs work, in Macrakis's user space, before we can even consider whether or not it is acceptable in mainspace. For now, it reads like a press release and seems more like one-sided journalism than balanced journalism. Please delete per |CSD G11 for now. If Wiki12rt leaves Wikipedia, never to return, then perhaps we can work further on the article in userspace then discuss whether it's acceptable in mainspace or not. Cheers, &mdash Deletion of Gigablast (2nd nomination) WP:SPA||WP:COI||WP:G11 Wikipedia:Single-purpose account 21 +635 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TamannaC User:AllyD 08:31, 2 August 2016 (UTC) delete """Despite the Economic Times piece on women claiming to have special healing powers and coverage of the two actors present at her book launch (apparently """"elated"""" to be part of the event, no less), I am not seeing |reliable evidence of |notability. If the launch-publicity coverage was to be considered as substantial (contrary to my opinion), then there is a consideration, as the vast majority of the article is non-encyclopaedic""" Deletion of TamannaC :WP:RS||:WP:BASIC||:WP:TNT Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +636 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Freiburg gang rape User:Pudeo 21:16, 7 November 2018 (UTC) keep """Although doesn't give much help, there is extended coverage of this crime and it seems to be tied to the media theme about the influx of refugees and public safety. Removals in the article itself seem to be just motivated by the belief that the mere coverage of high-profile crimes and the criminals' immigration status itself is """"racist""""https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2018_Freiburg_gang_rape&diff=prev&oldid=867704174&diffmode=source""" Deletion of 2018 Freiburg gang rape WP:NCRIME Wikipedia:Notability 71 +637 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pirates of the Caribbean: 4 User:YechielMan 13:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC) delete per ; I might consider an IAR speedy here because this really has no chance of becoming a legitimate article Deletion of Pirates of the Caribbean: 4 WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +638 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mustapha Farrakhan User:Epinoia 16:37, 19 September 2019 (UTC) delete article is very negative in tone and based on allegations - even if the allegations are true, there doesn't seem to be anything to establish notability per Deletion of Mustapha Farrakhan WP:BLPBALANCE||WP:SUSPECT||WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +639 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Von Ehrics User:Belasted 16:02, 1 March 2009 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Von Ehrics WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +640 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Parker (teenager) User:Pdcook 16:03, 26 July 2019 (UTC) delete I can't find non-trivial coverage of this person in RS. I suggest is relevant here Deletion of Matthew Parker (teenager) WP:ONEEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +641 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Houalla User:Guillaume2303 19:32, 7 June 2012 (UTC) keep Highest elected position at a major academic institution. Article needs cleanup to conform to English usage (tense, for example) and Deletion of Marc Houalla WP:MOS Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +642 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blackblack User:D 14:57, 11 February 2008 (UTC) keep and place {{Verify}} tag at the top of the page. If no |sources are added within the next few months I suggest re-AFD'ing it Deletion of Blackblack WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +643 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Sobel User:Joe 21:47, 11 June 2010 (UTC) delete I can't find significant coverage for this |person Deletion of Barbara Sobel WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +644 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of female classical conductors User:Lugnuts 06:46, 7 October 2013 (UTC) keep and expand. At first glance, I'd say delete, as a list of two entries is not a list. However, the category :Category:Women conductors (music) has many entries and that can be used to expand this list (maybe into a table with other info, country, when they were active, etc). The inclusion criteria is clear - any female conductor who is notable. And the argurement for deletion because of the category existing fails Deletion of List of female classical conductors WP:CLN Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates 5 +645 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allison Stanger User:David 18:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC) keep """At first I thought the nominator's scattershot approach to academic AfDs had hit a good target, because there was nothing in the article as nominated that would suggest a pass of . But I think she does pass, by virtue of her named chair, and that she also passes for the continuing media attention to her book """"One Nation Under Contract""" Deletion of Allison Stanger WP:PROF||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +646 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Young Investigators User:David 00:01, 25 April 2015 (UTC) delete In contrast to the related AfD of ''Journal of Emerging Investigators'', which had two major sources directly about the journal, the coverage of this one looks shallow and incidental to stories about other subjects. I don't think it passes and I don't see any relevant criterion of ournals Deletion of Journal of Young Investigators WP:GNG||WP:NJ Wikipedia:Notability 71 +647 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWE 2K (Mobile Game) User:Joseph2302 22:59, 6 April 2015 (UTC) delete WP:TOOSOON, Deletion of WWE 2K (Mobile Game) WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +648 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blossom Ozurumba User:Rhododendrites 14:32, 23 August 2016 (UTC) keep Looks to pass with the sources in the article and those linked by {{u|Montanabw}} and {{u|Stanleytux}}. &mdash Deletion of Blossom Ozurumba WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +649 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boguslaw Wozniak User:Bearcat 22:55, 14 March 2018 (UTC) delete """The """"inherent"""" notability of deputy heads of state attaches to the deputy heads of state of real established countries with real diplomatic recognition, not to the self-appointed governments of virtually unrecognized micronations whose ''only'' established diplomatic relationship is with one other unrecognized polity, and no |reliable source coverage has been shown to get him over as an individual in lieu""" Deletion of Boguslaw Wozniak WP:RS||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +650 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zum zum zum User:RyRy5 19:09, 20 April 2008 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Zum zum zum WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +651 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ENSCO Inc. User:Thryduulf 07:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC) delete """this looks like an """"about our company"""" type page. I can't see any evidence in the article that it meets """ Deletion of ENSCO Inc. WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +652 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chukwuma Onwuchekwa User:ImperatorExercitus 22:31, 5 April 2009 (UTC) delete fails , , and . No references, http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q=Chukwuma+Onwuchekwa only returns a few relevant hits...none of which give notability. Article in question doesn't even supply proper guidelines for writing an article. Cheers Deletion of Chukwuma Onwuchekwa WP:MUSIC||WP:BIO||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +653 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asghar Bukhari User:Kigelim 17:55, 14 June 2015 (UTC) keep defiantly . I would say meybe merge but since there is a lot of contraversy, dumping it on the org article seems counter productive. — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Deletion of Asghar Bukhari WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +654 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muaad Mohamed Aboud User:Angelo 12:33, 13 August 2009 (UTC) delete fails and . All other claims and opinions are not supported by notability guidelines Deletion of Muaad Mohamed Aboud WP:N||WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +655 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher O'Neill User:Julle 13:44, 6 May 2018 (UTC) keep Sources are good enough for verifiability and the subject passes with flying colours, as far as I'm concerned. As for his role as merely husband to someone who happens to belong to the Swedish royal family, and that he has undertakes no royal duties, well, he's still become part of the family whether he likes it or not, he's been treated much like Princess Sofia, Duchess of Värmland|Sofia or Prince Daniel, Duke of Västergötland|Daniel in the Swedish press, where he has definitely not been out of the spotlight, as the sources here, in the Swedish Wikipedia article and even more so a basic search in w:sv:Mediearkivet|Mediearkivet show. It's unfortunate in some ways, but it's not for him to decide Deletion of Christopher O'Neill WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +656 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick M. Novack User:Dawn 19:39, 25 May 2009 (UTC) delete """I don't see how the the burden of """"significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject"""" has been met here. Reference 2 http://www.ichiban1.org/html/history_E.htm doesn't mention Novack, and the melissadata.com and gravelocator.com refences http://www.melissadata.com/lookups/np.asp?ein=410956667http://www.melissadata.com/lookups/np.asp?ein=203761716 http://gravelocator.cem.va.gov/j2ee/servlet/NGL_v1 are just directory listings which do nothing to establish notability (the first of these doesn't mention Novack's name, either). The zoominfo reference confirms that he ran in a local election, but that doesn't meet criteria for inclusion. I agree with '''DGG''' that the we don't normally accept 3rd level military awards as establishing notability. Novack sounds like a genuinely good and honourable person who died way too soon, but that doesn't make him notable enough to meet Wikipedia's criteria""" Deletion of Patrick M. Novack WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +657 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Hamill (model) User:Gene93k 14:21, 14 December 2009 (UTC) delete Fails . All I could find was a European Gay Porn Awards nomination along with passing mentions at AVN/GayVN. Not enough Deletion of Luke Hamill (model) WP:PORNBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +658 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Black (cricketer) User:Lugnuts 13:16, 18 January 2021 (UTC) keep Meets N:CRIC. After a failed RfC, Fram is now trying to make his with wide-scale across the project Deletion of James Black (cricketer) WP:POINT||WP:DE Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +659 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Greenberg (soccer) (2nd nomination) User:Fenix 15:06, 17 November 2014 (UTC) delete Fails as has not played senior international football nor played in a |fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy |GNG Deletion of Michael Greenberg (soccer) (2nd nomination) WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +660 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Costello (actor) User:Kinu 02:40, 7 April 2020 (UTC) delete Many bit parts, but no substantive coverage to support a Deletion of Michael Costello (actor) WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +661 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Valve Corporation User:Sunmist3 10:33, 13 August 2016 (UTC) delete or redirect. Article is a , and doesn't provide any additional information compared to Valve Corporation. While displaying the events in chronological order is useful, a seperate article isn't need to do so Deletion of Timeline of Valve Corporation WP:REDUNDANTFORK Wikipedia:Content forking 33 +662 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bricemanning [[User talk:Ultimus|'''UlTiMuS''']] 09:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC) delete """To anon: it is not our job to prove that this term is worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. It is yours, since you are making the claim. All you have to do is provide a single reliable source per and I promise to vote for a keep. The problem is that you almost surely can't, and so this is nothing more than a non-notable, non-verifiable neologism that's only used by a few users on a few forums (""""narrow scope"""" per myself before""" Deletion of Bricemanning WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +663 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingswood Elementary School (Nova Scotia) [[User talk:174.254.193.84|talk]]) 19:16, 4 March 2021 (UTC) merge to Upper Hammonds Plains, Nova Scotia#Schools per and the longstanding precident of doing just that described at . Special:Contributions/174.254.193.84|174.254.193.84 Deletion of Kingswood Elementary School (Nova Scotia) WP:ATD||WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +664 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gnuboy User:MuZemike 05:37, 26 August 2008 (UTC) delete this looks a lot like many of the video game articles out there. In addition, this borders on Deletion of Gnuboy WP:ADVERT Wikipedia:Advertising 35 +665 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joanna Masingila User:Xxanthippe 01:32, 4 March 2012 (UTC) comment GS shows 392 cites with an h-index of 10. Could be a weak keep on rof#1 in a low cited field Deletion of Joanna Masingila WP:P Wikipedia:Portal 50 +666 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Eden User:Stubbleboy 12:13, 27 September 2006 (UTC) delete Alexa Traffic Rank for eden-electronics.com: 540,604. Also, this company just does not meet the criteria from Deletion of David Eden WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +667 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adana derby User:Inter 12:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC) keep not the best article, but I took a quick look through it and it seems well sourced and satisfies Deletion of Adana derby WP:NRIVALRY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +668 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morgane Polanski User:TJRC 01:55, 29 February 2020 (UTC) keep I'm seeing coverage in https://www.wmagazine.com/story/morgane-polanski-marc-jacobs-spring-2016/ W Magazine, https://www.harpersbazaar.com/culture/features/a10229/morgane-polanski-0415/ Harpers Bazaar (blog, but one meeting ) and the UK https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/morgane-polanski-i-would-never-change-my-fathers-name/ Telegraph. It is admittedly challenging to use a search engine to find material about her that is not primarily about her fugitive father, but it does seem to be out there if one takes the time to sift Deletion of Morgane Polanski WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +669 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Leisure Coffee User:PJM 04:08, 19 February 2006 (UTC) delete per nom. A band that would pass would turn up in a Google search. It's bullocks Deletion of The Leisure Coffee WP:NMG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +670 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3D Issue User:Spleodrach 09:46, 9 June 2021 (UTC) delete per Deletion of 3D Issue WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +671 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Story (Mariah Carey song) User:SWik78 12:51, 8 May 2008 (UTC) comment its a sure sign that it will be released''??? Have you ever read erifiability or eliable sources Deletion of Love Story (Mariah Carey song) WP:V||WP:R Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +672 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindi Blogging ka Itihas User:Pharaoh 13:29, 19 August 2014 (UTC) delete As per Dharmadhyaksha and fails Deletion of Hindi Blogging ka Itihas WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +673 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory G. Smith (2nd nomination) User:Crusio 15:21, 31 October 2008 (UTC) delete per Nsk92, does not meet Deletion of Gregory G. Smith (2nd nomination) WP:ACADEMIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +674 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russo-Ukrainian War (2nd nomination) [[User Talk:Jcmcc450|Talk]]) 10:00, 3 July 2021 (UTC) keep and recommend . I've been janitoring this page since 2015 and it's had endless attacks from users that POV push that generally ignore all rules. The same is happening here between the sockpuppeting of Ridax2020 and the ing and by the nominator. Jcmcc Deletion of Russo-Ukrainian War (2nd nomination) WP:SNOW||WP:BLUDGEON||WP:CANVASSING Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +675 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional vehicles (4th nomination) User:Softlavender 03:01, 15 September 2017 (UTC) keep This is a standard article, which are accepted throughout Wikipedia, as well as being useful reference articles to keep information handy and in one place. Any cleanup required can be done by editing; AfD is not cleanup. articles always exist in addition to and along with Categories; one ''never'' precludes the other and both are encouraged Deletion of List of fictional vehicles (4th nomination) WP:LISTOFLISTS||WP:LIST Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists 51 +676 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dick Lane (Cutler Heights, Bradford) User:Ohconfucius 03:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC) delete WP:HOLE|undistinguished road in an industrial estate. #DIRECTORY|Wikipedia is not a directory Deletion of Dick Lane (Cutler Heights, Bradford) WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +677 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaman Ali (philosopher) User:Bearian 14:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) delete per and - this is a twenty-something writer without major publications Deletion of Zaman Ali (philosopher) WP:TOOSOON||WP:MILL Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +678 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scarab (band) User:Cannibaloki 16:13, 17 February 2009 (UTC) delete can also be a |conflict of interest. Remember: Wikipedia ≠ Encyclopaedia Metallum Deletion of Scarab (band) WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +679 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asset management in Singapore User:Rusf10 04:50, 11 December 2017 (UTC) delete Wikipedia is not a directory Deletion of Asset management in Singapore WP:DIRECTORY Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +680 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metropolitan Community Church of New York (2nd nomination) User:Snotbot 02:18, 19 February 2012 (UTC) comment This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (|step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 February 19 Deletion of Metropolitan Community Church of New York (2nd nomination) WP:AFDHOWTO Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +681 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Pelosi User:Bkissin 22:03, 4 January 2019 (UTC) delete I don't know if minor-league sports ownership is enough to prove notability for me personally, and as others mentioned |notability is not inherited Deletion of Paul Pelosi WP:INHERIT Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +682 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indhuja Ravichandran User:Nosebagbear 13:44, 16 June 2019 (UTC) keep she satisfies criterion 1. The requirement is ''significant'', not leading coverage. She's been the 3rd or 4th actor/actress in multiple films Deletion of Indhuja Ravichandran WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +683 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill Chill User:Kubigula 23:04, 19 February 2007 (UTC) delete I can't find multiple nontrivial sources regarding the character. Article raises concerns about Deletion of Jill Chill WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +684 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brothers Under the Bridge User:Esradekan 12:55, 17 July 2008 (UTC) delete all, fails notability per #Songs Deletion of Brothers Under the Bridge WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +685 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oversimplified User:Robert 02:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC) delete This is written in the present tense and so is a |biography of a living person and is unreferenced. Notability is only an issue if a reference is added while the AFD is running Deletion of Oversimplified WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +686 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Last Piece Theory User:Bearian 18:16, 28 June 2007 (UTC) delete per nom, or Urban legend Deletion of Last Piece Theory WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +687 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyrus Ahanchian User:Schazjmd 21:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC) delete """although the article title could be redirected to :Ahanchian v Xenox Pictures Inc., et al). I cannot find any significant coverage of the individual to support or notability, and none of the reliable sources currently in the article support notability of Ahanchian. The impact of the legal case doesn't extend notability to the person (). Adding to my statement, since has rightfully been mentioned and I didn't address it initially: the films that Ahanchian's been associated with don't meet """"significant or well-known work or collective body of work"""". No awards; none of the work has """"been the primary subject of an independent and notable work... or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews"""". Ahanchian is not """"regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors"""", he is not """"known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique"""". Does not meet """ Deletion of Cyrus Ahanchian WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:BLP1E||WP:FILMMAKER||WP:FILMMAKER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +688 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sister Vincenza User:Just 18:58, 31 December 2009 (UTC) keep The article is well referenced – witten in a |NPOV style and informative. Conspiacy??? That I believe, is left to an individual’s own mind-set. As to the article itself, meets all the criteria for inclusion Deletion of Sister Vincenza WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +689 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hidden Messages in Water User:Eggishorn 18:07, 15 April 2020 (UTC) merge and Redirect to Masaru Emoto The sources given for notability of the article do not establish notability independent of the author so merging to the parent topic per , as {{u|Crossroads}} points out, is appropriate Deletion of The Hidden Messages in Water WP:NOPAGE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +690 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Korn's ninth studio album (2nd nomination) User:Doc 13:24, 5 September 2008 (UTC) delete Hey, McWomble stole my |crystal |hammer bit! (not like I mind). Anyway, remember, this is a band who Untitled Korn album|simply didn't title their eighth record, so I wouldn't be surprised if the title isn't announced for a long time, so that part of isn't applicable. But there's no tracklisting and they're not even in the studio yet, so it still gets bonked on the head with a crystal hammer (The Wizard of Evergreen Terrace|patent pending Deletion of Korn's ninth studio album (2nd nomination) WP:CRYSTAL||WP:HAMMER||WP:HAMMER Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +691 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Li Jian (singer) User:Hisashiyarouin 04:45, 2 April 2015 (UTC) keep Satisifies at least #9, most recently with second place in I Am a Singer (Chinese TV series) season 3, and a handful of other awards dating back to 2006. Do see :zh:李健 (歌手) and search by the Chinese name for expansion, where you should find at least the sort of http://xw.qq.com/ent/20150330055822 interview with a Chinese newspaper. '''野狼院ひさし Deletion of Li Jian (singer) WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +692 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of modelled aircraft in IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover User:Rorshacma 16:42, 26 May 2021 (UTC) delete The game is certainly notable, which is why we IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover|have an article on it. This list, however, is complete material, per the arguments presented in the nomination Deletion of List of modelled aircraft in IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover WP:GAMEGUIDE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +693 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rolling Stone Queen of Pop Index User:HĐ 04:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC) delete No indication of notability per Deletion of Rolling Stone Queen of Pop Index WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +694 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billy Rosewood User:MichaelQSchmidt 04:18, 13 July 2009 (UTC) keep """as it does not matter that it is a character from a notable film as long as the article subject receives coverage in relable sources that meets .... and """"Billy Rosewood"""" seems to get the coverage. The character was specifically covered and in depth by http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,964514,00.html Time Magazine in 1987, and again by http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101870601-146766,00.html Time Magazine in 2001. And there is significant coverage of the character in relation to the actor: http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,302383_2,00.html Entertainment Weekly, http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=CSTB&p_theme=cstb&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB36DBF223D9D03&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM. Chicago Sun-Times... and http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Billy+Rosewood%22&btnG=Search&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&scoring=a many others. This is a case where there is enough to support an article about the character, per the precedents set by Hawkeye Pierce, Hot Lips Houlihan, Archie Bunker, Al Bundy, et al""" Deletion of Billy Rosewood WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +695 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spider Gang User:doomsdayer520 01:22, 27 September 2020 (UTC) delete Probable |promotion attempt for musical act that self-releases and self-promotes its material. Good luck with that, but for Wikipedia you have to be |noticed and covered by someone other than yourself Deletion of Spider Gang WP:PROMOTION||WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +696 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hypnos (band) NONE NONE delete Ok, lets take a look at the criteria Deletion of Hypnos (band) WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +697 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss International (USA) User:Utcursch 12:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC) delete unless |reliable sources are provided to establish notability. As of now, I don't see any references or links that indicate enough notability Deletion of Miss International (USA) WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +698 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Mariner User:Belovedfreak 21:51, 23 May 2011 (UTC) delete apparently no significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources. I can't see anything in the article that would meet |notability guidelines Deletion of Albert Mariner WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +699 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Velubha Vaghela User:AllyD 07:48, 5 January 2016 (UTC) delete An elected position in a village of under 6000 population does not meet criteria 2 or 3. In addition, the given reference just mentions the village in a list, and not the person, so is providing no verification, leaving this article an |unsourced BLP Deletion of Velubha Vaghela :WP:POLITICIAN||:WP:BLP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +700 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/也是醉了 User:Hisashiyarouin 13:33, 9 November 2014 (UTC) delete """per . This article is about a Chinese internet slang and nothing else. Cnilep might find use for its literal meaning (""""I am also drunk"""", which is easily commonplace) but no notability would be established for that case. Also Baidu Baike is not RS anyway""" Deletion of 也是醉了 WP:NOTDICT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +701 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm Bout Tha Stax (Intro) User:Iowateen 00:58, 18 July 2009 (UTC) keep The article passes criteria 2 of . Has had a charted single or album on any national music chart Deletion of I'm Bout Tha Stax (Intro) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +702 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Wimbledon Championships - Girls' Singles Qualifying User:TerriersFan 21:17, 7 May 2011 (UTC) delete fail . If anything notable happens in the qualifying events then that can be mentioned in the pages on the main tournies Deletion of 2010 Wimbledon Championships - Girls' Singles Qualifying WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +703 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Growing Out (film) User:Blathnaid 20:05, 24 February 2008 (UTC) delete Fails , as there is no coverage in reliable sources Deletion of Growing Out (film) WP:NF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +704 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radiohalo User:Happyme22 17:32, 18 May 2008 (UTC) delete Citations are badly needed and is an issue Deletion of Radiohalo WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +705 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuits d'été & La damoiselle élue User:Niggle1892 17:33, 22 September 2019 (UTC) keep per . The article's COPYVIO issues have now been dealt with - brief review excerpts will be supplied in due course Deletion of Nuits d'été & La damoiselle élue WP:NALBUM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +706 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold Garner User:Fuhghettaboutit 21:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC) delete unless |reliable sources are provided substantiating a fact about him which meets . Presently, this is a resume, albeit with some material which if verified and expanded could potentially meet a criterion. A look at Google doesn't help greatly because there are many false positives for identically named individuals. I find violations of distasteful, but once posted, the article has to be considered on the merits Deletion of Harold Garner WP:RS||WP:BIO||WP:COI Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +707 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric D. Snider User:Kinu 19:32, 15 September 2006 (UTC) delete ignoring the s' comments which hardly seem to cite inclusion policy; fails , no indicating notability Deletion of Eric D. Snider WP:SPA||WP:BIO||WP:RS Wikipedia:Single-purpose account 21 +708 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of UK Admiralty Charts, 1967 User:Dr 20:42, 22 July 2021 (UTC) keep This is a very valuable source of information and is exactly what Wikipedia is for. Also per others Deletion of List of UK Admiralty Charts, 1967 WP:NOTCLEANUP Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +709 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Traya User:Chiswick 18:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC) delete an open-and-shut case. No notability whatsoever. Even if the single event were of interest, it would fall foul of . But it isn't even that Deletion of Abdul Traya WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +710 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shraga Hager User:Chabuk 15:31, 9 September 2007 (UTC) delete I'm really quite astonished that there is even a discussion here. The article makes no sourced or verified claim of notability, even if he is the Rebbe of this sect (and I don't doubt that he is) that does not make him independently notable. He objectively fails nearly every qualification of and simply does not meet criteria for inclusion. For goodness sakes, I come closer to notability under WP guidelines then he does Deletion of Shraga Hager WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +711 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pegasus Airlines Flight 8622 User:Sandstein 21:53, 20 January 2018 (UTC) delete WP:MILL transportation incident, got extensive reporting likely because of the dramatic imagery, but still a case of . Expensive things break all the time Deletion of Pegasus Airlines Flight 8622 WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +712 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siobhan Benita User:Timrollpickering 09:42, 6 May 2012 (UTC) merge to London mayoral election, 2012 per and long standing convention that simply being an unsuccessful candidate is not sufficient for notability Deletion of Siobhan Benita WP:ONEEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +713 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdurrahman Roza Haxhiu User:GiantSnowman 16:27, 23 September 2009 (UTC) delete fails and . Having something named after you doesn't infer notability Deletion of Abdurrahman Roza Haxhiu WP:ATHLETE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +714 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas J. Devine User:I9Q79oL78KiL0QTFHgyc 03:44, 13 May 2015 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Thomas J. Devine WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +715 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intentional Names of Pokémon [[User Talk:JzG|Just zis Guy you know?]] 13:19, 25 April 2006 (UTC) delete per and concerns above Deletion of Intentional Names of Pokémon WP:V||WP:NOR Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +716 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of U.S. cities with most households without a car User:Lugnuts 08:24, 12 December 2018 (UTC) delete seems like a one-off study that's been made into its own (useless) wiki-article. And Deletion of List of U.S. cities with most households without a car WP:NOTSTATS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +717 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cricket dolls User:Ritchie333 16:07, 17 July 2013 (UTC) keep Mentioned in http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Y1JUAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Cricket+doll%22&dq=%22Cricket+doll%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=X7_mUbiwJK2d0wWw_oHYDg&redir_esc=y Vanguard Volume 17 (Vancouver Art Gallery., 1988), http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=emoB6nlNoMEC&pg=PA117&dq=Cricket+doll+tape&hl=en&sa=X&ei=4L_mUf4fhJfUBYH9gbAD&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Cricket%20doll%20tape&f=false Social World of Pupil Assessment: Processes and Contexts of Primary Schooling Ann Filer, Andrew Pollard {{ISBN|9781847143969}} p.117 and http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=0srtp8elakMC&pg=PA262&dq=Cricket+doll+tape&hl=en&sa=X&ei=4L_mUf4fhJfUBYH9gbAD&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Cricket%20doll%20tape&f=false Out of the Garden: Toys, Tv, and Children's Culture in the Age of Marketing Stephen Kline Verso 1993 {{ISBN|9781859840597}} p.262 . Lots more coverage in nostalgia blogs and sales on eBay, but those three sources, plus the coverage Andrew picked up, ought to be enough to meet . Should be at least possible to |wipe out any copyvios and start again Deletion of Cricket dolls WP:GNG||WP:TNT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +718 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seafood Network User:RGTraynor 16:53, 20 March 2007 (UTC) delete This near-to-spurious vanity article is about a website that hasn't seemingly been updated in over a year, according to its main page. There are '''zero''' hits on Australian Google for it, if you leave out its own server http://www.google.com.au/search?as_q=&hl=en&num=10&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=SeaFood+Network&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=www.sfgaming.my-php.net&as_rights=&safe=images. Fails , NN, and probably as well. Nice try, guys Deletion of Seafood Network WP:ATT||WP:BULLSHIT Wikipedia:Attribution 34 +719 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled (R. Kelly album) User:Cliff 02:04, 22 June 2009 (UTC) delete """WP:NALBUMS basically says that albums shouldn't have their own article until the title, release date and track list have all been |verified. It does note that """"in a few special cases an unreleased album ''may'' qualify for an advance article"""" if there's a sufficient amount of verifiable info about it. But since there's only about a paragraph here, I think that the verifiable info here can go to R. Kelly|the artist's article until we get the release date and track list""" Deletion of Untitled (R. Kelly album) WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +720 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HESOPHIA HC12 User:Hobbes 23:21, 17 June 2012 (UTC) delete """This 6-week-old EP is the first release by this non-notable artist. Article is completely unsourced, and I didn't anything usefully from web searches. Makes a claim that the album charted for a week on...something--some random website? It's not clear. Unfortunately, ecord charts lists nothing for Indonesia. Article claims that first track """"Hesophia"""" is the most popular, and I did find it on Youtube, where it has racked up 38 total views. If decent sources can be found, happy to look again, but as it stands, not even close to being notable""" Deletion of HESOPHIA HC12 WP:RS||WP:R Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +721 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael White & The White User:Wildthing61476 17:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC) comment For now, but I have to ask, does a tribute band also have to meet the requirements of Deletion of Michael White & The White WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +722 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estophobia User:Edison 16:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC) keep """but '''Rename''' to Anti-Estonianism or other merely descriptive term, because the present title fails as a neologism and the references are not about it per se. I looked at a number of the references and did not find the term in them. The article, as is, is poorly written, and a series of """"TBA"""" headings would be better kept in the creator of the article's sandbox until he/she finds acceptable sources satisfying to use in writing them. The references do make the case that there are people who do not like Estonia and Estonians, and that there is and has been oppression and harrassment. This is hardly surprising, as there are people who do not like and who harrass, attack or kill Israelis, Arabs, Mexicans, people from the United States, the French, the Irish, the British, Asians, Jews, Christians, Moslems, Gypsies, Germans, Russians, Pakistanis, Indians, (and Indians of various castes), Native Americans, African Americans, African Africans who are White, African Africans who are Black, and many other definable racial/ethnic/national/religious groups. Wikipedia is not paper, so if there are multiple reliable and independent sources (such as presented for this article) with substantial coverage to show a history of hatred, discrimination, harrassment and prejudice against any such group, then it is not original research or synthesis to write an article based on those sources""" Deletion of Estophobia WP:A Wikipedia:Attribution 34 +723 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prerna Kohli NONE NONE comment This source assessment table reviews sources that make a assessment of her as an expert, including articles from mainstream news sources listed on her website, as noted above, and others found during an online search Deletion of Prerna Kohli WP:SECONDARY Wikipedia:No original research 12 +724 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip W. Simpson User:Dushan 13:42, 10 May 2019 (UTC) delete as for this AUTHOR. Taking a closer look, the best source is Kirkus https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/phillip-w-simpson/rapture-rUSqHhoz/, although it is not the bluechip source it used to be. I am not confident that the review in School Library Journal, https://www.slj.com/?reviewDetail=minotaur isn real, i.e., it may be a post by a post-at-will, and is certainly extremely brief. And I take Deletion of Phillip W. Simpson WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +725 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Fujimoto User:Jeendan 09:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC) delete Nice-looking page but there's nothing here that meets or Deletion of Ken Fujimoto WP:MUSIC||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +726 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morshu User:WanderingWanda 01:52, 4 February 2021 (UTC) delete Per and #KEEP there is no reason to get rid of a harmless redirect that is potentially useful to readers (for example, one could imagine a reader coming across a reference to Morshu and typing it into the search bar to see what the name is from Deletion of Morshu WP:CHEAP||WP:RFD Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap 74 +727 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Daly User:Sammy1339 00:30, 3 November 2014 (UTC) keep Authored several papers with hundreds of citations each. Extremely clear notability per Deletion of Martin Daly WP:SCHOLAR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +728 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thach Thi Ngoc User:Lugnuts 16:58, 3 May 2015 (UTC) delete Per nom. This person didn't compete at the Olympics. This article was created by a user who is now blocked for long-term copyright issues, and I suspect this could easily be a of some kind. The only saving grace for the article is that she held the national high-jump record. But this is unsourced, so the is on the article creator to source this, if it is indeed true Deletion of Thach Thi Ngoc WP:COPYVIO||WP:BURDEN Wikipedia:Copyright violations 16 +729 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ehrman Mitchell User:power 17:10, 4 January 2018 (UTC) keep """I think GNG (and possibly ) is met. https://books.google.com/books?id=Jh7ecV24_uAC&pg=PA637&lpg=PA637&dq=Ehrman+B.+Mitchell&source=bl&ots=q3pfJAsqdW&sig=kmZ5RcKLV0ovzpkPB8N40CT1YZA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiPnIeU5b7YAhWC6oMKHdu_DjY4ChDoAQgqMAE#v=onepage&q=Ehrman%20B.%20Mitchell&f=false (from the Almanac of Architecture & Design, which I can't vouch for), http://pcad.lib.washington.edu/person/987/ (Pacific Coast Architecture Database, which isn't user-generated but does include """"relatively unknown and unhearlded designers""""), and https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/allaback/vc2a.htm (National Park Service bio) are all significant coverage""" Deletion of Ehrman Mitchell WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +730 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Climb Media User:K 04:10, 6 December 2018 (UTC) delete does not meet ; significant RS coverage not found. Insufficiently notable for a redirect even, and the article history is 100% spam & not worth preserving Deletion of Climb Media WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +731 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Jaffe User:Agricola44 16:26, 2 December 2010 (UTC) delete """In addition to the above, pointers to his work """"Land of Dreams"""" are actually self-referential and much of the article is for discussing """"Land of Dreams"""" and """"Hobgoblins""" Deletion of Jacob Jaffe WP:COATRACK Wikipedia:Coatrack articles 47 +732 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeoke (Lučani) User:Hog 18:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC) keep a village reporting a population in a national census meets for me Deletion of Zeoke (Lučani) WP:GEOLAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +733 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major:The Film User:Otr500 06:40, 24 March 2019 (UTC) delete """Does not pass Wikipedia:Notability (films). A |BLP related article with one dead source, that has an apparently unrelated title: """"2 NSG men killed, six others injured in Mumbai gunbattles"""", could likely be speedy deleted""" Deletion of Major:The Film WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +734 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carmine Miranda User:Nagle 01:13, 17 November 2014 (UTC) keep Yes, big COI problem. I've taken a lot of hype out of the article. I think the article subject does, just barely, pass , with two recordings on a major, or at least reasonably established, label. AllMusic verifies those recordings. He did place in a major music competition, again, just barely (score 7.00, cutoff 7.00). Close call. This is classical; everything is smaller and lower-key than in pop Deletion of Carmine Miranda WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +735 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fan Wars (1999 film) User:Karaboom 20:22, 2 August 2007 (UTC) delete No secondary reliable sources, as defined in and . The movie director is not an independent source Deletion of Fan Wars (1999 film) WP:NOTE||WP:PSTS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +736 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Richmond High School gang rape User:Xymmax 16:52, 6 November 2009 (UTC) keep """although I won't shed a tear if it is deleted. The split between NOTNEWS !votes and N/CA !votes is stark, but in reality people are talking across each other rather than engaging the issue. The NOTNEWS camp holds that this article, irrespective of verifiability, NPOV, and notability of the material, is not appropriate, and cannot be made appropriate. The N/CA folk are essentially saying that there is plenty of coverage from which an article can be written. In other words, one group asks """"could we"""" while the other asks """"should we"""". I come down moderately as saying """"we should"""". There all ready is coverage that addresses the larger context of this event, see http://www.statesman.com/opinion/content/editorial/stories/2009/11/04/1104swan_edit.html here for example, or listen to the audio coverage http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=114287592&ps=rs here (notice both of the opining professors are blue links). Since notability, in the sense of independant coverage in wp:reliable sources|reliable sources cannot reasonably be challenged, I think that an article treating the event is appropriate. I will confess to reservations about BLP issues, which I encountered http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2009_Richmond_High_School_gang_rape&action=historysubmit&diff=323476997&oldid=323475774 early on with this article, and eventually prompted me to list it on the /N|BLP noticeboard, but I think that there are enough sets of eyes to keep things under control""" Deletion of 2009 Richmond High School gang rape WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +737 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arturo Rodríguez Quezada User:Smartyllama 13:48, 1 February 2019 (UTC) keep Passes per above, as any remote amount of would have shown Deletion of Arturo Rodríguez Quezada WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +738 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hbomberguy User:Onetwothreeip 01:35, 22 January 2019 (UTC) keep """per User:Ihaveacatonmydesk and for being covered in multiple sources for multiple events. Proposer is likely only familiar with the recent """"charity stream"""" and not Brewis' other notabilities. Article may need a title change too""" Deletion of Hbomberguy WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +739 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judy Wood User:David 23:11, 14 April 2007 (UTC) delete Ph.D.s having wacky theories is not in and of itself notable, and self-published theories on web sites are not reliable secondary sources of notability. The academic paper and letter in a journal by two others debunking her theories are such a source, but not enough of a source to convince me that anyone takes her theories seriously or that she's an important part of the 9/11 conspiracy theory world. Put it this way: if we were evaluating a non-crackpot Ph.D. for notability using , one self-published paper with only two citations would be very far from satisfying that guideline Deletion of Judy Wood WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +740 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RussArt.com User:Starblind 13:41, 17 October 2006 (UTC) delete I don't see this passing at present. No coverage in reliable sources Deletion of RussArt.com WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +741 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madison Pro Soccer User:SportingFlyer 05:55, 25 September 2018 (UTC) keep passes from the references provided Deletion of Madison Pro Soccer WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +742 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The People's Cube User:GBRV 21:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC) comment """If anyone really thinks that a double standard isn't being used regarding """"reliable sources"""" and """"notability"""", I invite you to look at any of the uncountable articles about the Pokemon video game series, such as Bulbasaur evolutionary line - the scientific guide to the various species of Pokemons. Here you will find a taxonomic chart that includes the full evolutionary sequence (Squirtle evolves into Wartortle; Mega Lizardon X does not evolve, and so on). What do you suppose the """"reliable sources"""" are for this chart? Scientific journals? Biology textbooks? CNN? No, most of it comes from the game company's own """"Pokedex"""". There are tens of thousands of similar articles dealing with other video games, using sources that most of the people here would not consider reliable but which are usually deemed usable for that type of context. Don't accuse me of because articles like these are practically the norm, not exceptional cases. I fully expect the Deletionists to go through and get rid of all of these articles""" Deletion of The People's Cube WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +743 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virender Dahiya User:Rugbyfan22 09:35, 5 April 2021 (UTC) merge Has played 1 FC, 2 List-A and 2 T20 games, but I couldn't find any significant coverage. Seems to have gone into governmental work so cricket career seems to be over. Sources may exist in Indian sources though. Redirect is a suitable and maybe could have been BOLDly done instead of AfD Deletion of Virender Dahiya WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +744 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Guzman User:Johnuniq 02:21, 10 April 2017 (UTC) delete No evidence that is satisfied. The references I checked had only superficial mentions Deletion of Elizabeth Guzman WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +745 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diary Of A Wimpy Kid: The Worst Summer Ever [[User talk:68.219.240.190|talk]]) 13:48, 18 September 2010 (UTC) delete per G3. Pure nonsense. -Special:Contributions/68.219.240.190|68.219.240.190 Deletion of Diary Of A Wimpy Kid: The Worst Summer Ever WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +746 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantum Legacy (game) User:Vizjim 23:10, 31 July 2006 (UTC) delete this article Deletion of Quantum Legacy (game) WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +747 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitmixes (2nd nomination) User:L 22:05, 2 January 2011 (UTC) delete Agreed with Xwomanizerx. No promotion, only remixes of previously heard songs, article is a stub and does not seem to pass , simply charting in one country isnt significant coverage Deletion of Hitmixes (2nd nomination) WP:NALBUM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +748 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worthy to Say User:Nouse4aname 20:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC) merge to appropriate album article. Fails and . A separate article is not necessary for this song Deletion of Worthy to Say WP:MUSIC||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +749 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Reality (Mod) User:Wickethewok 17:55, 29 September 2006 (UTC) delete Fails , . No multiple reliable sources = no article. Fyi, many mods ''have'' been deleted in the past Deletion of Project Reality (Mod) WP:RS||WP:V Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +750 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/5-1-0 User:Narutolovehinata5 NONE delete Patent nonsense. Recommend #G1|CSD G1 Deletion of 5-1-0 WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +751 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ubiquiti Networks NONE NONE delete Opened last year and has 2 patents, so where's thenotability ??? David200K article on Unite the Right rally is excessive to the point of absurdity, but I'm clearly in the minority on that point. Having a sub-article based on this is reasonable if there's no consensus that the existing article is Deletion of DeAndre Harris WP:UNDUE Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +1042 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haifa International Conference for a WMD-Free Middle East user:Shrike 22:08, 11 March 2021 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Haifa International Conference for a WMD-Free Middle East WP:NEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1043 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chemistry Misconceptions User:Kinu 21:46, 9 August 2006 (UTC) delete patent , the picture may be a copyvio nope, it's just an MS Paint job Deletion of Chemistry Misconceptions WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +1044 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astro (television) User:Narutolovehinata5 02:25, 16 December 2017 (UTC) keep but stubify to a neutral state - Although I'm not Malaysian, I am aware of the company as being one of the biggest, if not the biggest television service provider in Malaysia, and a search confirms this status and results in coverage for the company: enough to pass . However, the article is quite a mess and is essentially a promotional piece; as such, if the article is to be kept, the closer or any other editor should probably reduced the article to a short neutrally-worded stub then work from there. Basically without destroying the building Deletion of Astro (television) WP:NCORP||WP:TNT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1045 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wes Carroll (radio & tv personality & publisher) User:23skidoo 12:28, 8 July 2008 (UTC) delete as per nom. ;) Seriously, though, there seems to be little to suggest notability outside his region. The magazine only has regional distribution and the Guiness record is unsourced. Nothing here really sets off the alarm, but there needs to be better sourcing to assert notability and right now I'm just not seeing any Deletion of Wes Carroll (radio & tv personality & publisher) WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +1046 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jase Harper User:Lankiveil 22:05, 13 May 2010 (UTC) delete """going to go with """"not notable"""" at this time. I thought that the Ledger Awards might get him over the line, but I can't find any reliable reference to him winning them, and the award's page (ledgerawards.org) seems to be down. There's nothing else in the rest of the article as far as I can see which would have Harper meeting , but I'd be happy to be contradicted on that""" Deletion of Jase Harper WP:CREATIVE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1047 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamdi Zurqani User:David 21:57, 23 November 2020 (UTC) delete WP:TOOSOON, citations not yet strong enough for #C1 and no other case for notability is apparent Deletion of Hamdi Zurqani WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1048 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucky Office User:TreasuryTag 09:47, 1 March 2009 (UTC) delete no notability asserted, little |citing of sources Deletion of Lucky Office WP:CITE Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1049 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hartley Jackson (3rd nomination) User:Jammo85 NONE keep As per criterion 1 and criterion 3. As the subject has had significant roles in stage performances, or other production. You can link this directly to professional wrestling events and performances, some related in this article. In criterion 3, Jackson has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. Entertainment meaning that of pro wrestling. Jackson has not only competed for over 20 years, but has coached talent locally and worldwide, even for the largest company listed in WWE and WWENXT and has many supporters of this. He has also made considerable and prolific and innovative contributions to the very undervalued Australian wrestling community by bringing more international experience back to coach others after his excursions. Along with coaching and producing WWE talent with his skills also falls under criterion 3. Wrestling is also considered creative, especially the training and event aspect, so its possible criterion 1 can come into play here as it states the person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors, in which case for Jackson is true in the professional wrestling world. He is regarded as a very important figure and regarded to be Australia's top trainer that is even cited by a reliable source in PWTORCH. He is also widely cited by his peers, successors in interviews and statements, some of which are included in the article. He has fought for AND held notable championships that are listed in Wikipedia articles as notable championships. This should NOT be included as inheriting notability, because winning a championship is a notable accomplishment, especially both local and international championships. As per He was with not only signed with WWE, but also to NJPW. I understand it was not as a wrestler for WWE, but as a coach and producer where he is able to give innovative contributions to signed talent through his coaching and producing of events. But as a wrestler for NJPW, its sourced he was attached to NJPW in LA from December 2005 to moving on to NJPW Japan ending July 2006. Even though it was a different country, NJPW still organized events at the LA Dojo and the events in Japan, making it in line with the where Jackson consistently appeared for NJPW over the course of three months. This covers many bases for notability in that criteria. can include his fight in Lethwei, as a sportsperson is presumed to be notable if the person has actively participated in a major amateur or professional competition. Jackson participated in Lethwei in Japan and it was a major professional competition held at the Korakuen Hall fighting venue in Japan. The company ILFJ signed a broadcasting deal with MNTV (Myanmar National TV) for events to be aired in Myanmar with livestreaming of events available in Japan on AbemaTV and FITETV. Thanks Deletion of Hartley Jackson (3rd nomination) WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:PWBIO||WP:ARTIST||WP:CREATIVE||WP:PWBIO||WP:PWBIO||WP:SPORTSPERSON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1050 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conquistador (band) (2nd nomination) User:onel5969 13:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC) delete Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show they pass . Would not oppose it being moved to draft, if there is interest to improve the sourcing and content Deletion of Conquistador (band) (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1051 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cosmonaut (Angels and Airwaves song) User:TenPoundHammer 11:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC) delete as |crystal ballery. Seriously -- a single that's not going to be released until September?! Whoever wrote this article needs to |chill. (I like Angels & Airwaves too, but dang Deletion of Cosmonaut (Angels and Airwaves song) WP:CRYSTAL||WP:CHILL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1052 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DOGMA (1994 film) User:Tokyogirl79 16:51, 26 August 2012 (UTC) delete This is one of many potentially COI articles created to form a walled garden around the director. A search brings up no reliable and independent sources to show that this film is notable. Now even if River Phoenix were to star in the film, having a notable person in the film does not guarantee that the film will be notable. (Plus there's concerns over it being a hoax, although even if it's not one source is not enough to keep the article.) In any case, this just isn't notable in the slightest. It fails by a mile Deletion of DOGMA (1994 film) WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1053 """Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/""""C"""" is For (Please Insert Sophomoric Genitalia Reference Here)""" User:Tathar 08:35, 25 April 2011 (UTC) keep """I came to this AfD expecting something much different, but after seeing the article I decided to take a look for myself. A quick overview of the cited sources leads me to believe that the article meets """"significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject"""" as in and . The IGN article in particular needs to be cited more than it is based on the depth of the coverage. The Blabbermouth articles are also somewhat useful as source material. However, source #3 seems to lack any instance of """"Puscifer"""" and is an opinion article, which is generally not suitable as a source on WP. Also, I'm afraid that source #7 is a poor source as well. Not only is Twitter generally a poor source (with some exceptions), the link is prone to link rot as it doesn't link to the specific tweet's permalink. I also wonder why source #9 is used. As far as I can tell, it appears to be an ecommerce site selling the album, which I must recommend against using whenever possible. Is there perhaps a better source for that? Perhaps someone can clean up the page to meet album article guidelines""" """Deletion of """"C"""" is For (Please Insert Sophomoric Genitalia Reference Here)""" WP:NALBUM||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1054 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vermin Supreme User:Qrsdogg 17:20, 7 June 2011 (UTC) keep Clearly a notable performance artist, easily passes otability (people): http://www.boston.com/news/globe/magazine/articles/2004/01/11/merry_prankster/http://swindlemagazine.com/issue18/vermin-supreme/http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/5-questions-for-vermin-supreme?&CSAuthResp=%3Asession%3ACSUserId|CSGroupId%3Aapproved%3ABA4A9537C4BF4594E11F4B09D8217743&CSUserId=94&CSGroupId=1http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/articles/27812/running-gaghttp://news.google.com/newspapers?id=0qY8AAAAIBAJ&sjid=shQGAAAAIBAJ&pg=2434,2378853&dq=vermin-supreme&hl=enhttp://books.google.com/books?id=LqU8TZMMRQwC&pg=PA129&dq=%22Vermin+Supreme%22&hl=en&ei=NVzuTbyGJafz0gHeya3eAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CEAQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=%22Vermin%20Supreme%22&f=false Deletion of Vermin Supreme WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1055 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloodfist 2050 User:Adamant1 19:58, 25 July 2020 (UTC) delete Lacks the coverage needed to pass or . Since only a few reviews are out there about it and they are in sketchy sources. The fact that's connected to an otherwise notable film series doesn't really matter either Deletion of Bloodfist 2050 WP:GNG||WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1056 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satux User:Wikieditor06 17:52, 14 August 2008 (UTC) delete Lack of |notability and seems like pam|advertising to me Deletion of Satux WP:NOTE||WP:S Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1057 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Dean (magician) User:Paulmcdonald 14:06, 11 January 2018 (UTC) delete reads like an advertisement, so violates Deletion of Jason Dean (magician) WP:ADV Wikipedia:External links 45 +1058 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpinnWebe User:Rodii 13:10, 23 February 2006 (UTC) comment """I won't keep commenting here, but I do want to note a few things: (a) I can't speak for anyone else I resent the implication that I'm here because Schumin """"recruited"""" me. I have zero interest or involvement in SpinnWebe; I read AfD and comment where I have something to contribute—I didn't see Schumin's note until after I commented here. But informing people who have spoken up in a debate that it's continuing in another forum |could be seen as a courtesy instead of a conspiracy. (b) Wikipedians have a right to comment, even if they have some involvement in the issue being discussed. Please note that the alleged meatpuppets actually made arguments and didn't just do the usual newbie """"'''Dont Delete our Board you fuckers!'''"""" kind of nonsense we often see on AfD. (c) The Mirsky nom is a separate issue, but """"kids these days"""" sounds funny rather than snide to me. Maybe you have to be old to get it. (d) Most importantly, if you read the page JerseyDevil so triumphantly adduces, instead of just his cherrypicked examples, in my opinion you'll see Spinn working fairly respectfully ''within'' the Wikipedia process to get his page reinstated. To hold up that page as some kind of evidence of bad faith is just not appropriate""" Deletion of SpinnWebe WP:AGF Wikipedia:Assume good faith 53 +1059 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bogosort [[User talk:24.36.199.169|talk]]) 21:32, 22 June 2011 (UTC) comment The first two are just dictionaries, which Wikepedia is not a dictionary . While the conference lecture published in LNCS does have merit, there are millions of professional lectures and articles published every year. 24.716 articles where published in LNCS in 2007. http://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=25674&tip=sid. A single publish reference is not sufficient to establish noteworthiness, unless the algorithm itself is actually somehow noteworthy.Special:Contributions/24.36.199.169|24.36.199.169 Deletion of Bogosort WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1060 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Floating Men User:Jahiegel 18:52, 31 July 2006 (UTC) delete per Gay Cdn's application of Deletion of The Floating Men WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1061 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NetLink Trust User:HighKing 18:18, 15 October 2020 (UTC) keep It is listed and https://www.netlinknbn.com/analyst_coverage.html covered by many analysts. I can't access the analyst reports but https://sginvestors.io/sgx/stock/cjlu-netlink-nbn-tr/analyst-report there are many of them. Analyst reports meet the criteria for establishing notability as per and I am satisfied to assume that at least two of these reports provide Independent Content and in-depth analysis. Topic meets GNG/NCORP Deletion of NetLink Trust WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1062 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Lucey User:BrownHairedGirl 15:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC) comment WP:BLP#Deletion refers to summary deletion, not to AFD. This AFD is open for 7 days, which is quite adequate for an editor to find just one reference in a which verifies the central claim to notability. I am not suggesting that article needs to be expanded or fully referenced in that time, just that we need ''one'' reference to establish the existence of the subject and the claim to notability. If such a reference has been added by the time the AFD is closed, then obviously my !vote to delete will be invalid (and if I spot the change, I'll happily strike it my !vote once the ref is added) ... but if the article remains unreferenced after 7 days under the spotlight, then we are at last resort stage Deletion of Stephen Lucey WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1063 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frode Fredriksen User:Govvy 12:24, 10 February 2021 (UTC) keep Seriously, there are enough decent hits in google for the guy, I can't understand the language hits know, the article has currently seven citations, although could be better written. He has won the 1. divisjon (OBOS-LIGAEN) 2001,https://www.eurosport.co.uk/football/frode-fredriksen_prs423801/person.shtml and there must be more offline sources. I am getting fed-up with these nominations that clearly lack Deletion of Frode Fredriksen WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +1064 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irish Secret Service User:Quarl NONE delete as |unverifiable. Not even very notable as a conspiracy theory. An article on Irish Secret Service Fund could be created if someone wants. &mdash Deletion of Irish Secret Service WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1065 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Werner G. Scharff User:Lightburst 19:41, 7 December 2019 (UTC) keep notable per RS. The article has reliable sources and others also exist per Deletion of Werner G. Scharff WP:NEXIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1066 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kansas City Royals minor league players User:Muboshgu 15:03, 5 November 2014 (UTC) keep Alex is being y and I've already ed him. We have a long standing consensus on how to do this that he doesn't seem to comprehend, and now he's wasting our time and resources on this farce. –  Deletion of Kansas City Royals minor league players WP:POINT||WP:TROUT Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +1067 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick McClean User:GiantSnowman 18:40, 5 April 2017 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Patrick McClean WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1068 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tourneys in A Song of Ice and Fire (2nd nomination) User:Reyk 07:00, 24 July 2010 (UTC) delete excessive fan trivia. Wikipedia is not an |indiscriminate collection of information Deletion of Tourneys in A Song of Ice and Fire (2nd nomination) WP:INDISCRIMINATE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1069 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monte Snavely [[User talk:64.107.182.4|talk]]) 19:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC) merge fails . Special:Contributions/64.107.182.4|64.107.182.4 Deletion of Monte Snavely WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1070 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Border jack User:Hans 16:15, 1 May 2011 (UTC) delete or '''redirect''' to List of dog hybrids. This is a ridiculous sub-stub with not much chance that it will ever grow beyond, at most, stub size. Clearly fails . From an organisational point of view it just doesn't make sense to cover this on a separate page. That's how an encyclopedia differs from a dictionary. And no, a hybrid between races is not the same as a species. The species of all dogs is canis lupus (i.e. ''grey wolf Deletion of Border jack WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1071 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Morgan State University Athletic Hall of Fame User:L 06:41, 22 July 2008 (UTC) delete consists solely of a list/directory of individually non-notable people. It's a well compiled list and the sourcing could be worse, but I just don't think it has a place here. For the record, I hold essentially the same opinion about the other articles listed by Marylandstater, remember- |the existence of other examples of something does not justify that something's existence. Furthermore, I rather resent the subtle implications of racism in Marylandstater's post. Frankly, I think most people haven't even ''heard'' of Morgan State University (I hadn't) and thus would not know that it is or isn't an African American college (I didn't). Let's try to keep that sort of misplaced sentiment out of this discussion, as I've found it tends to ''dis''courage honest dialogue and ''en''courage needless |drama Deletion of List of Morgan State University Athletic Hall of Fame WP:OSE||WP:DRAMA Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +1072 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USS Wistaria (SP-259) User:Amisom 13:58, 19 January 2017 (UTC) delete """because I do not consider the entry in the Dictionary constitues |significant coverage (""""directly and in detail""""). Further, that is also only one source, and the requires coverage in ''sources'', plural, even going on to clarify: ''Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability.'' The 'keep' arguments all seem to be along the lines of , etc. — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by""" Deletion of USS Wistaria (SP-259) WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG||WP:INTERESTING||WP:LOOKSGOOD Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1073 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of blue-eyed soul artists [[User_talk:Neon white|talk]] 12:37, 30 October 2008 (UTC) keep Valid topic for a list. Seems like a |snowball to me seen as the original reasons for nominated have proven to be mistaken. --neon white Deletion of List of blue-eyed soul artists WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +1074 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prosa SA/SD/RT Modeller User:Seraphimblade 23:27, 2 December 2013 (UTC) delete while I initially intended to close this discussion, the discussion got too off-track to really have a good result. Having done my own evaluation of the sources, the sources cited are either instruction manuals, or mentions in passing in sources which are not ''about'' this software, but only mention and perhaps briefly review it as one possible piece of software that does this. Passing mentions do not establish |notability and are insufficient to sustain a full article, and the length of time the software has been around is irrelevant to that as well. While not in itself a reason to delete, the article currently reads like a glossy brochure, and the dearth of reference material makes this largely unfixable Deletion of Prosa SA/SD/RT Modeller WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1075 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family Plastics User:HighKing 18:57, 26 April 2017 (UTC) delete Fails and GNG. Pure corporate advert, not one notable feature Deletion of Family Plastics WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1076 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phone Call to Putin (3rd nomination) User:Neurolysis 04:03, 19 January 2009 (UTC) merge into Human rights in Russia. Per the title is a non-notable neologism and hence the content should be merged. On a procedural note, it was inappropriate for Deletion of Phone Call to Putin (3rd nomination) WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +1077 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Antelmi User:GiantSnowman 20:12, 7 July 2014 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Patrick Antelmi WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1078 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scottsdale National Golf Club User:Northamerica1000 07:28, 2 January 2018 (UTC) merge to Scottsdale, Arizona#Golf as a functional -M. The suggested merge target presently lacks a mention of this golf club Deletion of Scottsdale National Golf Club WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +1079 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phyllis Bolds User:Thincat 20:58, 9 April 2019 (UTC) keep """My start on WP predates the notability guidelines and I remember them being proposed and developed. It is therefore natural for me not to see as rules that are to be obeyed but as suggested criteria to be mulled over. The guidelines are intended to serve a purpose – to try and be reasonably sure articles meet our content policies as explained at otability#Why we have these requirements. It looks to me that this article does indeed meet these policies pretty well. If applying the criteria strictly line-by-line leads to a """"fail"""" (I don't know whether or not it does) then, in my view, the guidelines are not giving good advice in this case""" Deletion of Phyllis Bolds WP:GNG||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1080 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pyramid (game show) broadcast history User:Mandsford 13:05, 27 October 2010 (UTC) keep """It's a legitimate spinoff from the article about the longstanding (on and off since 1972) show. Some people enjoy articles with what the nom describes as """"way, way, way, way too much information"""" on the page, and they simply call it """"information"""". In the case of programs with a long history, articles are spun out for such things as episode guides, lists of characters, and so forth. It's funny how redirects to something that makes no mention of either TV or televsion. Wikipedia is not as heavy on TV show articles as it used to be-- when I first came here, we had lots of articles about individual episodes and biographies about minor or even one-show characters, and relatively few about real events and real people-- and I think that over the last several years, it's become less of a TV guide than it had been""" Deletion of Pyramid (game show) broadcast history WP:NOTTVGUIDE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1081 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oldest living United States president [[user talk:sottolacqua|talk]]) 15:40, 2 July 2011 (UTC) delete per #STATS Sottolacqua Deletion of Oldest living United States president WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1082 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreams of Deception User:Edtropolis 19:54, 16 June 2007 (UTC) delete As per nom. Basically #MYSPACE|Wikipedia is not MySpace Deletion of Dreams of Deception WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1083 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Flare User:Hoppingalong 04:18, 12 March 2012 (UTC) keep Though I have much more experience in geography, not music, the MTV and Shure book sources strike me as compelling. They note he invented a particular technique. That seems to support his passing No. 3, if only by a hair. http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=SMCB&p_theme=smcb&p_action=search&p_text_direct-0=11BA964E93343E98&p_field_direct-0=document_id This news article Michig cited also gives his real name and age and discusses an incident where he was shot. All together, I think he passes Deletion of DJ Flare WP:ENT||WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1084 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geographical distribution of English speakers user:Andrew 09:43, 12 June 2019 (UTC) merge per and Deletion of Geographical distribution of English speakers WP:REDUNDANTFORK||WP:PRESERVE Wikipedia:Content forking 33 +1085 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rude Awakening (band) User:Kudpung 20:27, 5 October 2010 (UTC) delete Fails . See A7: ''...an article about a band that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject Deletion of Rude Awakening (band) WP:BAND||WP:CSD Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1086 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pavani Gangireddy User:Ab207 07:35, 6 September 2020 (UTC) delete Lacks . Fails Deletion of Pavani Gangireddy WP:SIGCOV||WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1087 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transformers: Robot Masters User:Piotrus 09:37, 11 November 2019 (UTC) delete Fails / Deletion of Transformers: Robot Masters WP:NFICTION||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1088 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hula Popper User:Wavy 19:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC) delete per . Sounds more like something you'd find on the appetizer menu at T.G.I. Friday's than a sexual term Deletion of Hula Popper WP:NFT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +1089 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beer-In-Hand (2nd nomination) User:MartinDK 16:59, 22 November 2006 (UTC) delete per the above arguments and Wikipedia is not for things |made up on St. Patricks Day. One question: Isn't there a no drinking rule when voting given that this passed a previous AfD he he Deletion of Beer-In-Hand (2nd nomination) WP:NFT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +1090 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creating Opportunities in Vietnam User:RadioFan 20:25, 18 March 2010 (UTC) delete just doesn't have the coverage to meet Deletion of Creating Opportunities in Vietnam WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1091 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Squidbillies characters User:J947 22:31, 31 December 2019 (UTC) delete just a whole bunch of unsourced unencyclopedic information which does not seem to pass |GNG or |LISTN. Could merge to a new section at Squidbillies but none of this content is actually appropriate for merging given that it is |original research. '''Happy New Year Deletion of List of Squidbillies characters WP:GNG||WP:LISTN||WP:OR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1092 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian M Barnett User:Nikki311 05:37, 25 January 2016 (UTC) comment """he didn't perform """"in the highest level in two sporting fields."""" In baseball, he was in the minor league and training. In wrestling, he worked dark matches, tryouts, and as a jobber. I'll leave it to someone else to decide whether his mentions in the ''Phoenix News Times'' count as significant third party coverage to meet """ Deletion of Brian M Barnett WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1093 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Branigan: Boy Genius User:Splash 18:12, 8 September 2005 (UTC) delete either invention or deep |crystal ball gazing. IMDb hasn't heard of it either which they surely would have done if there was this much known about it. I reckon that text has been hacked around from some other movie synopsis and dumped here Deletion of Andrew Branigan: Boy Genius WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1094 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uppercut (band) User:Shauri 15:02, 24 September 2005 (UTC) delete doesn't meet Deletion of Uppercut (band) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1095 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noob tube User:Department 14:03, 12 January 2010 (UTC) delete per all of the above, particularly Deletion of Noob tube WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +1096 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jubbly User:Miquonranger03 16:50, 9 September 2008 (UTC) delete per (and above), since all I can find is people using the phrase wubbly-jubbly again and again. Even that's not appropriate for inclusion, since it seems to be a neologism Deletion of Jubbly WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1097 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Kehr (2nd nomination) User:Voceditenore 11:21, 18 March 2016 (UTC) delete """this advertorial. The subject comprehensively fails both the |general notability criteria for biographies and the alternative criteria at uthor. The book is self-published. It has not been reviewed in any independent publications as far as I can see. Amazon sales rankings are notoriously unreliable, as are the """"customer reviews"""". Required reading: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/oct/18/amazon-sues-1000-fake-reviewers """"Amazon sues 1,000 'fake reviewers' """", ''The Guardian'' and http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/uk_news/National/article1618237.ece """"How to fake a bestseller"""", ''The Times''. It would need to be on something like the New York Times Bestseller List and/or to have been the subject of multiple reviews in real publications to even have a remote chance of being considered notable. I can find no coverage of the subject himself, apart from brief mentions (10 years ago, when he was presumably 14) in a couple of articles on the use of websites to find people missing in Hurricane Katrina, of which his was one of many. His company is 4 months old and has zero coverage. Incidentally, I have removed the article's external link to the book's page on Amazon""" Deletion of Alex Kehr (2nd nomination) WP:BIO||WP:A Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1098 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert T. Tobin User:MER 12:10, 28 January 2018 (UTC) delete as a #Addressing contributors|presumptive copyright violation Deletion of Robert T. Tobin WP:COPYVIO Wikipedia:Copyright violations 16 +1099 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of BattleTech characters User:Zxcvbnm 14:14, 9 January 2020 (UTC) delete Unadulterated fancruft, delete per Deletion of List of BattleTech characters WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +1100 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Jennings User:Cptnono 01:42, 12 August 2009 (UTC) comment I have already expressed concerns over the resume like style of the article. This is based off little things that can hopefully be fixed and would be appropriate in another discussion. In regards to deletion, I recommend that Timemachine1967 takes a look at to see if his work with Loanshark or anything else meet the criteria. If those are too restricting please also see if he meets the or Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Basic criteria|basic criteria. He looks close to me and I would be surprised if we could not find the coverage Deletion of Jay Jennings WP:CREATIVE||WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1101 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Alquilar User:Hmlarson 17:55, 2 September 2016 (UTC) keep Criteria noted by nominating editor is no longer valid. Additional references added to re-inforce notability. Article needs expansion, not deletion per Deletion of Maria Alquilar WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +1102 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PoPo Patrol User:Meters 23:51, 25 March 2017 (UTC) delete """I can't find any sources for this group to show that it meets or GNG. The only source currently in the article is the group's facebook page. Originally there were two more refs, but neither of them actually mentioned the group. One was to OPRAH.COM, to support the more than a bit dubious claim that """"The band was the reason behind Oprah's Book Club"""" and the second was to http://www.fueledbyramen.com/ in support of a claim that the band was signed to Fueled by Ramen. Neither of these claims was supported by the cited sources. I'm also rather dubious of the claim that the band is currently touring with Blink-182, Sum 41, Twenty One Pilots and other bands. Note that the band's Soundcloud account has all of three followers, two of whom are the band members""" Deletion of PoPo Patrol WP:NMUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1103 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deadly Impact User:Taylor 19:06, 21 August 2014 (UTC) keep Three reviews by reliable publications exist. DVD Verdict: http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/deadlyimpact.php Two DVD Talks: http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/43895/deadly-impact-unrated/ http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/42226/deadly-impact/. There is also a brief review http://www.northjersey.com/arts-and-entertainment/new-on-dvd-this-week-1.953887 here. According to IMDb the Mansfield News Journal also reviewed it, but their link is dead and I can't find any archives. In any case, this movie seems to pass Deletion of Deadly Impact WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1104 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imma Be User:Abecedare 02:35, 9 January 2009 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Imma Be WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1105 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chemistry Set Records User:Wwwwolf 21:37, 17 May 2006 (UTC) delete """per head-spinning-inducing screeds. Anons, please note that ranting about unrelated articles isn't going to help the case of ''this'' article. Also, """"Someone doing something first"""" isn't notable per se, unless the action really is world-changing (think of then-famous and now-famous bands getting leverage from Napster - while this is just some company hopping on the bandwagon a lot later). In this case, Weed may be notable, but there's no evidence about the company's notability (unless some is provided); as such, it may warrant a small mention in the Weed article. But unless this company is notable in its own merits, it doesn't need an article of its own - so please, read carefully and explain a contrary point. (And what does http://www.dict.org/bin/Dict?Form=Dict2&Database=*&Query=arist rising up have to do with P2P music distribution, anyway? Sorry, not intended as a lame spelling flame or anything - I was just so colossally disappointed when I thought I might learn some new musical term that I ''had'' to complain. Sorry""" Deletion of Chemistry Set Records WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1106 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Nell NONE NONE delete Sources used to establish notability under need to be independent, reliable, and in-depth; of the current sources, almost all are passing mentions (a sentence or two of barebones biography in the context of Mo Farah or the train safety program) or publicist bios from his own or his agents' websites. The closest to a satisfactory source is http://www.emel.com/article?id=80&a_id=2255 a three-paragraph bio in emel (magazine), which is pretty good for establishing notability but not very detailed or specific, and anyway GNG requires multiple such sources. Google finds no better ones Deletion of Colin Nell WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1107 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berg publishers User:EconomistBR 21:11, 25 May 2008 (UTC) delete 2 days have passed and no independent, reliable sources were found, delete per . If reliable sources confirming notability are found just recreate this article Deletion of Berg publishers WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1108 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allosexual User:Zumoarirodoka 14:20, 25 April 2015 (UTC) delete The topic is clearly non-otable. I noticed it with https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Asexuality&diff=659110861&oldid=659108965 this edit at the Asexuality article (followup edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Asexuality&diff=659111324&oldid=659110861 here), and I noted that it would be deleted. And even if it were otable, we certainly don't need some tub about this topic; it would be similar to the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agender case Deletion of Allosexual WP:N||WP:S Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1109 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lin Liangming User:GiantSnowman 09:32, 7 November 2015 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Lin Liangming WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1110 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2617 Jiangxi User:Padenton 15:14, 2 May 2015 (UTC) merge to List of minor planets: 2001–3000 per (specifically ) and . ―  Deletion of 2617 Jiangxi WP:NASTRO||WP:NASTCRIT||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1111 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Antonio Solano User:Amalthea 21:57, 8 August 2008 (UTC) delete agree with the nomination. The Segunda División B|third level league is neither fully professional nor a national leage, so topic falis and even Deletion of José Antonio Solano WP:ATHLETE||WP:FOOTYN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1112 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LeninFighters User:Coredesat 08:52, 3 July 2006 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of LeninFighters WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1113 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/.sport User:SGGH 06:33, 10 June 2008 (UTC) delete article about an unofficial proposal suspected to perhaps be made sometime in 2009, |Wikipedia does not predict the future and notability can't be inherited from the future either, particularly based on such unofficial, predicted proposals that may or may not happen Deletion of .sport WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1114 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Welsh Conference Junior League User:The 02:55, 13 December 2017 (UTC) keep We generally keep articles on ''leagues'', as a sporting competition's governing/organising body is generally notable. There is a lack of prose, but |that's for improvement, not deletion. Now, given this is a ''junior'' competition, there is the possiblity of merging to South Wales Premiership, the adult league it is apparently affiliated with, if sourcing cannot be found Deletion of Welsh Conference Junior League WP:NOTCLEANUP Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +1115 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finders Keepers (casual game) User:Perfect 17:04, 27 August 2008 (UTC) delete NN. Deletion of Finders Keepers (casual game) WP:NOTE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1116 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loose Logic (2nd nomination) [[User talk:08OceanBeach SD|08OceanBeachS.D.]] 22:40, 20 June 2011 (UTC) keep Mentioned in various local newspapers, though not cited. As of now fails criterion Deletion of Loose Logic (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1117 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaia series User:DarkSaber2k 10:36, 28 June 2007 (UTC) keep Yes the article admits it's not an offical series, but |Wikipedia is about verifiability, not truth. So while it may not be a true series, it IS verifiable through numerous |reliable sources that fans and gaming professionals alike refer to these games as a series. If there were no reliable sources, I'd be quite happy to say delete, but there are, so I won't Deletion of Gaia series WP:V||WP:RS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1118 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyperlexicon User:StraussInTheHouse 03:55, 21 February 2019 (UTC) delete per {{noping|Squeamish Ossifrage}}. Plus per Deletion of Hyperlexicon WP:NOTNEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +1119 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pacific Square User:Exit2DOS2000 21:53, 17 November 2011 (UTC) keep its not ''just'' a local shopping centre. Its a combination of shopping centre/apartment complex with onsite medical assistance for the residence ... ''that'' is unusual and worthy of ote. Exit2DOS Deletion of Pacific Square WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1120 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ORY User:Hisashiyarouin 02:02, 26 March 2015 (UTC) comment """1) In fact ORY (all caps, 2006) is older than Ory (normal caps, 2014). (2) Technically nom """"suggest merge"""" and not deletion makes this in a wrong place to discuss (start a merger discussion per ). (3) Personally I see we can '''move''' Ory (normal caps) → Ory (surname) because that's all the current article stores, and then ORY → Ory as the main dab. '''野狼院ひさし""" Deletion of ORY WP:MERGE Wikipedia:Merging 58 +1121 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric de Sturler User:Plastikspork 03:30, 16 January 2009 (UTC) comment """Article was first created by IP 128.174.245.145, which is at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Checking this first version http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eric_de_Sturler&oldid=5402143 and an edit by """"DutchMom""""http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eric_de_Sturler&diff=207202787&oldid=184753574 who only edits this pagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/DutchMom, it looks like there could be a . Just FYI""" Deletion of Eric de Sturler WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +1122 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter King (organist) User:Yakushima 14:11, 10 February 2011 (UTC) comment From clues on Peter King's website, I tracked down this a review in a seemingly reputable source by a seemingly reputable reviewer.http://www.gramophone.co.uk/review/poulenc-respighi-rheinberger-poulenc-respighi-rheinberger. Not so much focus on King, though. Actually a fairly laudatory review -- the reviewer makes detailed comparisons to other work, but keeps coming back to King's interpretation of the pieces on the disc. Need more to meet , though, I think Deletion of Peter King (organist) WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1123 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raxola User:Alan 23:06, 16 January 2013 (UTC) delete per and a stronger delete per and Deletion of Raxola WP:BAND||WP:TNT||WP:BACKLOG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1124 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaac Richards (footballer) User:GiantSnowman 07:32, 9 April 2018 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Isaac Richards (footballer) WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1125 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michel van Rijt User:Mdtemp 20:01, 18 November 2014 (UTC) keep Medals at four world championships (even if only 2 are sourced) is enough to meet . I think the whole section on training can go unless someone can add some sources Deletion of Michel van Rijt WP:MANOTE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1126 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armenia–France relations User:Meowy 16:29, 18 February 2012 (UTC) keep """the article as it is now is bit of a disaster area, but the subject itself is entirely valid and notable. The subject is NOT restricted to international relations between two states, as a perusal of the various other Wikipedia """"county xxxx-country yyyy relations"""" articles will show. Ash's argument for deletion is not valid. If it is admitted that the subject IS notable enough to have a Wikipedia article then the current content of the article is unimportant as far as deletion arguments go. See: otability#Notability_guidelines_do_not_limit_content_within_an_article """"Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article. If the subject has not been covered outside of Wikipedia, no amount of improvements to the Wikipedia content will suddenly make the subject notable. Conversely, if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing within a Wikipedia article will not decrease the subject's notability""" Deletion of Armenia–France relations WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1127 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M2SYS Technology User:M2arman 19:24, 27 May 2008 (UTC) keep seems to meet with three valid references. I took the liberty of some copyediting. As for the nomination rationale, please provide evidence that Deletion of M2SYS Technology WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1128 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/After Hours (British TV series) User:Toughpigs 00:52, 20 January 2020 (UTC) keep National TV show as per . There's the usual coverage of a new show before broadcast (https://www.radiotimes.com/news/2014-06-23/jaime-winstone-and-ardal-ohanlon-to-star-in-new-sky-comedy-set-around-an-internet-radio-station/ Radio Times) and after (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/tv-and-radio-reviews/11970577/After-Hours-review-charming.html The Telegraph). Also coverage on https://www.comedy.co.uk/tv/news/1523/after_hours_sky_comedy_series/ British Comedy Guide. It's not a very good article and it doesn't have references, but they and there's no reason to say this is worse than any other run of the mill article on a one-season national TV show Deletion of After Hours (British TV series) WP:TVSERIES||WP:NEXIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1129 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynn Coulter (2nd nomination) User:Rhododendrites 14:11, 27 June 2016 (UTC) delete Fails . Not seeing enough. &mdash Deletion of Lynn Coulter (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1130 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Cuomo User:SimonKnowsAll 23:06, 25 July 2012 (UTC) delete It fails and is not well cited Deletion of Ralph Cuomo WP:CRIME Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1131 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frances M. Vega User:Nsk92 23:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC) keep Admittedly there's not a lot here in terms of coverage, but I think there's just enough to satisfy . I have added an extra source, https://www.tdtnews.com/archive/article_e9bab327-4c76-5f25-893e-8dcc49ce3c49.html, a newspaper article regarding the dedication of the Post Office named after her; the article contains some info about Vega's family background that could be added to the page Deletion of Frances M. Vega WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1132 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Tang User:TedE 18:25, 28 June 2006 (UTC) delete as non-notable (). Not even close. There are dozens (if not hundreds) of such stories in the US every year (hard beginnings, pick-themselves-up-by-the-bootstraps character, reward). None of them are notable Deletion of Ashley Tang WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1133 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Philippos of Greece User:Willthacheerleader18 14:16, 18 July 2021 (UTC) keep Prince Philippos of Greece and Denmark'', in accordance with the naming of articles of other members of the former Greek royal family. Appears to have enough coverage to pass , and all his other siblings have their own articles. Not to mention there are already articles for him on https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prins_Philippos_af_Gr%C3%A6kenland/ Danish Wikipedia, https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ph%C3%ADlippos_de_Gr%C3%A8ce_(1986)\ French Wikipedia, https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filipe_da_Gr%C3%A9cia_e_Dinamarca_(1986)/ Portuguese Wikipedia, https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felipe_de_Grecia/ Spanish Wikipedia, https://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felip_de_Gr%C3%A8cia/ Catalan Wikipedia, https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippos_van_Griekenland_en_Denemarken\ Dutch Wikipedia, https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%BF,_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%86_%D0%93%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B8_%D0%94%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8\ Russian Wikipedia, https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippos_av_Hellas_og_Danmark/ Norwegian Wikipedia, https://th.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%88%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%8A%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A2%E0%B8%9F%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%9B%E0%B8%9B%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%AA%E0%B9%81%E0%B8%AB%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B5%E0%B8%8B%E0%B9%81%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%B0%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A3%E0%B9%8C%E0%B8%81\ Thai Wikipedia, https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D1%96%D0%BB%D1%96%D0%BF%D0%BF,_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%86_%D0%93%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%86%D1%96%D1%97_%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%94%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%96%D1%97/ Ukrainian Wikipedia, https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%95%E3%82%A3%E3%83%AA%E3%83%83%E3%83%9D%E3%82%B9%E3%83%BB%E3%83%86%E3%82%A3%E3%82%B9%E3%83%BB%E3%82%A8%E3%83%A9%E3%82%B6%E3%82%B9_(1986-)/ Japanese Wikipedia, https://et.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil%C3%ADppos_(Kreeka_ja_Taani_prints)/ Estonian Wikipedia, and https://mk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BF_(%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%86_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%93%D1%80%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0)/ Macedonian Wikipedia Deletion of Prince Philippos of Greece WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1134 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Townsend User:MER 08:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC) delete this |vanispamcruftisement Deletion of Bill Townsend WP:VSCA Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +1135 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/تفاحتة User:PamD 18:54, 13 August 2012 (UTC) merge """using a title transliterated into roman alphabet, per : """"Names not originally in a Latin alphabet, as with Greek, Chinese or Russian, must be transliterated into characters generally intelligible to literate speakers of English""" Deletion of تفاحتة WP:UE Wikipedia:Article titles 18 +1136 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Dunn (businessman) User:Bearian 18:18, 9 January 2014 (UTC) delete unless soembody finds and adds more information. There is a ''WSJ'' article about his work, but we need more |significant coverage. His name is common enough that |online searches are prolematic Deletion of Tim Dunn (businessman) WP:SIGCOV||WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1137 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imperial Garden User:Jerem43 20:17, 17 December 2010 (UTC) comment the Best of Madison is a readers poll and does not establish Notability per otability Deletion of Imperial Garden WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1138 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farm Fresh To You [[User talk:NukeThePukes|Allons!]] 22:57, 7 July 2016 (UTC) delete No significant coverage, no sense of notability beyond the local area and no proof of notability within it. |Wikipedia is still not a web host. ''' ''Nha Trang Deletion of Farm Fresh To You WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1139 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiam Wanesse User:GiantSnowman 07:44, 7 June 2019 (UTC) keep meets ; needs improving, not deleting Deletion of Kiam Wanesse WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1140 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Merton College (London) User:Arxiloxos 23:09, 21 March 2014 (UTC) keep A merger (retaining the sourced historical content about this school) can be considered separately from the AfD but deletion would not be appropriate here, as {{U|Eastmain}} correctly states; |notability is not temporary Deletion of Merton College (London) WP:NTEMP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1141 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul McDonald (musician) User:Northamerica1000 22:04, 8 April 2014 (UTC) keep The subject passes and has received post-American Idol coverage in reliable sources, thus not failing WP:BLP1E Deletion of Paul McDonald (musician) WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1142 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Hairy Monster User:Captain 09:33, 16 July 2006 (UTC) delete per |CSD:A7. Tagged it accordingly Deletion of Big Hairy Monster WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +1143 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simply FOBulous User:CaliforniaAliBaba 09:06, 30 July 2007 (UTC) keep WP:N|Full-length articles in |reliable sources, listed below Deletion of Simply FOBulous WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1144 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Necessity Village User:JayJasper 18:31, 7 May 2013 (UTC) delete per Whpq. Coverage not sufficient to satisy Deletion of Necessity Village WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1145 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Softwareload User:Superastig 12:09, 16 July 2020 (UTC) keep It has received some coverage, though most of them are in German. With sources indicated above, the article is good enough to pass Deletion of Softwareload WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1146 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trembulo User:Czar 09:57, 24 December 2012 (UTC) delete """I searched for this during the RFC but came up dry other than a website that """"discovered"""" this instrument care of Wikipedia citogenesis. No relevant hits in Google Books. No |RS. No deal. (Note that there is a full Commons category to clean up if this is deleted: :commons:Category:Trembulo""" Deletion of Trembulo WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1147 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen McGarry User:Capitalistroadster 02:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC) delete She was impressive on the Einstein Factor but winning an episode of it is not sufficient to meet . As I recall, the episode last week didn't mention her age. No need for redirect to Einstein factor as there doesn't seem to have been any coverage of her Deletion of Kathleen McGarry WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1148 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Wiltshire User:WikiDan61 11:53, 26 March 2013 (UTC) comment """Mentioned at ..."""" is hardly the criteria we use for """ Deletion of Louis Wiltshire WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1149 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brock Miller User:Cbl62 00:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC) delete Nominator is correct that Miller does not satisfy , though a college football player can also qualify under . Here, however, I am not finding significant coverage in multiple, reliable, independents sources, as is needed to satisfy GNG. Brief transactional announcements such as http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/san-francisco-49ers-sign-punter-brock-miller-per-report/ this do not IMO constitute significant coverage of the type needed per GNG. Willing to reconsider if more significant coverage is found Deletion of Brock Miller WP:NGRIDIRON||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1150 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fibonacci numbers and Fractals User:QuidProQuo23 11:55, 11 September 2008 (UTC) delete per nom. Notability, , and it's just not encyclopedic Deletion of Fibonacci numbers and Fractals WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +1151 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans Tuppy User:Metropolitan90 05:06, 18 June 2006 (UTC) keep While the article is poorly translated, this person appears to be |well more notable than the average professor, having been president of the Austrian Academy for Science, and Federal Minister for Science and Research in the Austrian government. Maybe these positions are less notable than they sound, but it is verifiable that he held them. http://www.wien2004.ica.org/fo/speakers.php?ctNv1=48&ctNv2=&IdSpk=509&AlphSpk=@&p= He also turns up at least 46 times in a Google scholar search in contexts consistent with the article Deletion of Hans Tuppy WP:PROFTEST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1152 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn Fisher User:CAPTAIN 19:47, 15 March 2017 (UTC) delete Does not meet Deletion of Glenn Fisher WP:NHOCKEY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1153 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Typhoon Pepeng (disambiguation) User:BD2412 13:07, 21 May 2014 (UTC) delete per . A disambiguation page is merely a navigational device, one that is not needed where this navigation can be provided in a hatnote Deletion of Typhoon Pepeng (disambiguation) WP:TWODABS Wikipedia:Disambiguation 64 +1154 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integrated Conflict Management Systems User:Ihcoyc 18:34, 27 September 2006 (UTC) delete as OR, and for inappropriate vagueness and abstraction. ''An organization is a complex system of people, procedures, practices, policies, relationships, facilities, values, resources, cultures, services and products, production, activity and transformation.''. In Wikipedia:Plain English|plain English, wouldn't it be simpler to say ''An organization is an arbitrary string of abstract nouns''? I strongly suspect this is veiled |spam for a management consulting|consulting business Deletion of Integrated Conflict Management Systems WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Spam 26 +1155 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diversity (Black Lives Matter Guiding Principle) User:EdChem 08:10, 26 April 2017 (UTC) delete The Black Lives Matter article has a simple list of the principles and could be augmented with reliably-sourced text on their meaning. With sufficient sources, it could become necessary to create a more specific article such as Guiding principles of the Black Lives Matter movement which could explore different perspectives from inside and outside the movement in line with usual considerations for due weight, reliability of sources, NPOV, etc, and to have a simple summary in the parent article. Unfortunately, the essays here are not the basis for such an article as the task set was inherently non-neutral. I feel sad for the student editors {{u|Burgesspfc}} and {{u|AngelicBeaver}} because they are stuck trying to explore meaning of principles from the movement's perspective (the task set) and when policy requires neutral coverage of perspectives in accord with their weight in sources. Some of the sources used would be useful for an article but the content is not. Essays for tertiary education often require synthesis of information, advocacy / arguing for a perspective, and original ideas and thought, and all of these are inconsistent with encyclopaedic writing. These essays are not the basis for acceptable articles, a |blank page would be an easier starting point. If the students want to persist, there is a notable topic here and there are editors who would help, but given this is an assignment and the semester is nearly over, I will not be surprised if this does not occur. It is a shame when instructor-set work on Wikipedia is incompatible with Wikipedia policy, as seems to be the case here, and the Education Program is already planning to look at this case and the Environmental Justice case over summer – so hopefully we will not see cases like this arise again Deletion of Diversity (Black Lives Matter Guiding Principle) WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +1156 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hui martial arts User:Dane2007 21:23, 2 September 2016 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Hui martial arts WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1157 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Advantage User:Swerdnaneb 21:21, 20 September 2007 (UTC) keep Easily meets . They have two albums with a 5 Rue Christine|notable label (this needs sourcing) and Spencer Seim|a musician who brings notability from Hella (band)|another band Deletion of The Advantage WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1158 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mountain Astrologer User:Jovanmilic97 10:34, 14 November 2018 (UTC) delete This magazine fails . Literally nothing of the references (which are: a references without a link, second one is the closest to attribute to something but seems like a passing mention, primary stuff and the reference that has nothing to do with the subject) in the article is significant coverage of the subject to account to which counts towards . I was not able to find anything in secondary sources. Regarding as to what Atlantic306 has said, to pass you need to have ''significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.'' Not notable Deletion of The Mountain Astrologer WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1159 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KUMM User:Dravecky 00:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC) comment """The """"FCC License"""" comes into play from the top of the section. """"{{xt|Notability may be presumed for a radio and television broadcast station if it verifiably meets through reliable sources, one or more of a variety of factors, such as importance to and history in the station's market, as well as the uniqueness of the programming.}}"""" That """"reliable source"""" would be the Federal Communications Commission or FCC (a US Government entity) and the """"FCC License"""". The other """"factors"""" are also covered, since the programming is unique (ie: not from a satellite network like K-LOVE) and it has importance to the community (in this case the University of Minnesota-Morris community). Those are the main standards for creating a radio station page. Now, granted, I would like to see more of a history to the page and I can find a resident radio research""" Deletion of KUMM WP:BROADCAST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1160 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Gisborne Blackout User:Ajf773 23:09, 18 December 2016 (UTC) delete Non-notable event and . Article also lacks any sources Deletion of 2016 Gisborne Blackout WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1161 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoomcar User:Mz7 03:17, 7 May 2016 (UTC) keep The in-depth sources found by Northamerica indicate notability under . A HighBeam search also found https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-3664844171.htmlhttps://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-3737909631.htmlhttps://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-3556342261.html Deletion of Zoomcar WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1162 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Tollett User:Blue 14:35, 1 January 2016 (UTC) delete """for failing . Not known for anything other than """"also ran"""" in a beauty pageant. State title holders don't meet on that alone""" Deletion of Lisa Tollett WP:ANYBIO||WP:PAGEDECIDE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1163 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Website Baker User:Kylohk 00:59, 4 August 2007 (UTC) delete The article fails , since I can't find any independent non-trivial reliable sources on the Internet (just its official website and countless download pages). The live demo link the article provides is not functioning as well, so this software is not notable Deletion of Website Baker WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1164 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulling a parnham User:Thesquire 10:27, 3 March 2006 (UTC) delete WP:NFT, |non-notable unverifiable neologism, i.e. protologism Deletion of Pulling a parnham WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +1165 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardiak (3rd nomination) User:Alansohn 14:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC) keep The article continues to meet , and with appropriate reliable and verifiable sources Deletion of Cardiak (3rd nomination) WP:BIO||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:REFERENCE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1166 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flapamba User:Andrewa 23:00, 8 January 2013 (UTC) keep The article isn't encyclopedic in tone but the topic is encyclopedic. It could be stubified or perhaps merged to Emil Richards for the moment, but deletion is not the best way forward, and will just lead to more recreation. The solution is to develop good coverage of the topic(s). Disagree that it's purely part of a ''spam cluster'', but there are definitely possible COI issues that nobody seems to have addressed, remembering (diffs please if there have been attempts I've missed). Happy to work with the contributor(s) to resolve the issues Deletion of Flapamba WP:AGF Wikipedia:Assume good faith 53 +1167 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pathfinder books User:Mark 20:24, 8 November 2017 (UTC) merge to Pathfinder Roleplaying Game. This list-based article graduated from AfC into mainspace. This is obviously not indiscriminate, as there are clear inclusion criteria. Excessive detail is not a policy-based reason for deletion. Unencyclopedic is a vague term that is often a synonym for . (DGG, I know you can craft a better AfD rationale than this.) Anyway, it's good that the lists have some references, albeit they are mostly primary refs. I wasn't able to find in-depth independent sources discussing these books as a set. It likely fails notability criteria like . But given than the game is largely based on these books, it makes perfect sense to merge this content into the main Pathfinder article. Excessive information and catalogue-like info, such as the Code and Link columns, can be trimmed as a matter of routine editing. Per , a merge of content is preferred over deletion when there is verifiable material Deletion of List of Pathfinder books WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:GNG||WP:ATD Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +1168 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cytext ; Cytexting User:Doc 14:41, 2 August 2008 (UTC) delete WP:VSCA|Vanispamcruftisement. Also fails Deletion of Cytext ; Cytexting WP:NFT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +1169 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Oaks Mall, Florida User:TenPoundHammer 17:20, 18 June 2007 (UTC) keep seems notable enough at nearly 900,000 square feet, also has several |reliable sources. I'll be |bold and move this to The Oaks Mall (Florida), though. Move made to The Oaks Mall (Florida Deletion of The Oaks Mall, Florida WP:RS||WP:BOLD Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1170 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiss and Tell (album) User:Talkingbirds 18:25, 9 August 2009 (UTC) merge to Selena Gomez until an official, sourced tracklist surfaces, or it otherwise passes . Right now, it's just speculation, other than the name. (No exercise for my |hammer today Deletion of Kiss and Tell (album) WP:NALBUMS||WP:HAMMER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1171 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/College Square Mall User:Orlady 03:32, 18 October 2008 (UTC) keep or '''merge/redirect'''. Merging to Morristown would be a good option, as this is a major commercial center for Morristown and the surrounding rural region. Other 3rd-party coverage I have found online (not all of it ) includes http://www.deadmalls.com/?/malls/college_square.html DeadMalls.com, http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2007_Oct_9/ai_n27401129 a different version of the local newspaper story cited in the article, http://www.portfolio.com/resources/company-profiles/College-Square-Mall-298065 this short description of the mall, http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2005/nov/18/yeldell-speculation-on-turkey-creeks-new-tenants/ this Knoxville newspaper article about a planned store closure, and http://www.hamblencountygovernment.us/county_commission/county_clerk.cfm an item about the county clerk's branch office in the mall. Also, here's a http://74.125.45.104/search?q=cache:VgxpAz9jiBgJ:morristownnewspaper.com/news/view_sections.asp%3Fidcategory%3D3%26idarticle%3D9925+college+square+mall+morristown&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=125&gl=us&client=firefox-a Google cache link to another article in the local newspaper Deletion of College Square Mall WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1172 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Schlong user:DakotaKahn 05:05, 6 May 2006 (UTC) delete nn band fails Deletion of Dr Schlong WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1173 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ed, Edd n Eddy movie [[User talk:Satori Son|Satori Son]] 05:28, 1 October 2006 (UTC) delete Not yet enough for a stand-alone article. Most importantly, no credible sources as required by Deletion of The Ed, Edd n Eddy movie WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1174 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alec Powers (3rd nomination) User:Thryduulf 23:51, 13 February 2010 (UTC) keep The sources in the article show that he passes Deletion of Alec Powers (3rd nomination) WP:PORNBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1175 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lust on the Prairie User:Anonymous 16:18, 27 June 2021 (UTC) delete """fails . I found two reviews http://pvvonline.com/pvv/pvvreview-–-examples-of-romance-porn-3-wicked-pictures-heart-strings-2011/#.YNiggy94W-o http://www.adultdvdtalk.com/reviews/read_review.dlt/sku=25079/heart-strings-%28wicked%29.htm but those do not seem like """"… nationally known critics"""" as NFILM requires""" Deletion of Lust on the Prairie WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1176 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Baines User:CrazyAces489 22:46, 17 March 2015 (UTC) comment I am not going to walk you through the references like I did for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Thompson (Judo). If I put it in there, it is probably there. Part of AFD is using ... '''Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability.''' The 3 of you fail to do this for many of the articles that you are nominating. You can have the articles deleted if you choose. Arguing with all three of you is pointless to me. None of you are researching the articles as I clearly saw with Brewster Thompson Deletion of Greg Baines WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +1177 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Initiation (Kung Fu: The Legend Continues) User:Jfire 20:19, 16 February 2009 (UTC) merge """to series article unless and until significant reliable-source coverage of this individual episode is located and cited. Several editors have looked for such sources and failed. The burden of proof is on those asserting that this episode received significant critical commentary to |prove it, not on those who have tried and failed to find sources to prove that none exist. |""""Merely asserting that such sources exist is seldom persuasive, especially as time passes and actual proof does not surface""" Deletion of Initiation (Kung Fu: The Legend Continues) WP:PROVEIT||WP:N Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1178 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuka Ishikawa User:Kraxler 16:17, 30 August 2015 (UTC) delete fails and no coverage to pass GNG Deletion of Yuka Ishikawa WP:NSKATE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1179 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pepperfry User:Lemongirl942 02:53, 10 October 2016 (UTC) delete The sources are pretty bad. All the stuff in Economic Times is blatant redressed PR. Every single other source that I managed to look was using quotes by the company employees as story sources (which doesn't satisfy ). More importantly this is and should be deleted. Saying that promotional content can be fixed and putting the burden on volunteer editors is counterproductive. It is essentially encouraging the on Wikipedia. We don't want a situation. Once Wikipedia becomes a medium for promotion it loses its relevance as an encyclopaedia Deletion of Pepperfry WP:ORGIND||WP:PROMO||WP:SYSTEMICBIAS||WP:BOGOF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1180 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Wasow User:Fæ 19:21, 31 July 2010 (UTC) keep As he holds a named chair (according to the linked Stanford bio page), the article meets criteria 5 of . The article requires expansion and improvement so maintenance tags rather than deletion is the way to go Deletion of Tom Wasow WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1181 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/US Airways Flights User:Stuartyeates 01:19, 15 October 2011 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of US Airways Flights WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1182 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Peake User:S 20:30, 18 July 2012 (UTC) delete This is a biography of a living person and I can't find any evidence of any independent sources that pass Deletion of Anthony Peake WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1183 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steak Escape (2nd nomination) User:Wm335td 19:45, 4 September 2019 (UTC) keep per AmericanAir88's rationale. This is a notable franchise with multiple locations the article has . https://www.bizjournals.com/columbus/stories/2000/02/07/story4.html Business Journal, and (international) opening http://www.tradearabia.com/news/MISC_230263.html ten outlets in the United Arab Emirates Deletion of Steak Escape (2nd nomination) WP:RS||WP:PRESERVE Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1184 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Footvolley User:RHaworth 17:07, 11 August 2008 (UTC) merge to footvolley. This article is a simple |fork. &mdash Deletion of American Footvolley WP:CFORK Wikipedia:Content forking 33 +1185 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Den Klyuev User:Papaursa 03:08, 3 September 2015 (UTC) delete Despite a seemingly impressive record, there are no independent sources to support any of the claims so is not met. I'm also concerned about the accuracy of the claims. For example, the article claims he won a medal at the WKF world championships in 2013 but the WKF holds its world championships in even numbered years and I found no mention of a special shito-ryu division at the WKF website Deletion of Den Klyuev WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1186 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Papy Abedi User:Beansy 07:04, 18 December 2012 (UTC) keep I was going to not vote and simply comment that I didn't see the point of nominating articles for people who have a 90% chance of passing within a year (since he's still in the UFC), but after looking at his record Abedi had a fight for Shooto in addition to two for the UFC. That makes three fights for top-tier organizations per . He passes . He should not be up for nomination Deletion of Papy Abedi WP:MMANOT||WP:MMANOT||WP:MMANOT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1187 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julianne Benzel User:Bearian 16:06, 8 July 2019 (UTC) delete per - you'd be surprised by the number of teachers who are disciplined for what they say. Per |past long consensus, educators are not notable, even if they get into the news over an extended time. I'd cite an example, but I've gotten into trouble here for arguing otherwise Deletion of Julianne Benzel WP:MILL||WP:OUTCOMES Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill 32 +1188 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Shahid (singer) NONE NONE comment """He may be notable per criterion 8, """"Has won or been nominated for a major music award"""". A reliable source says """"His solo album 'Nilambori', nominated for popular Meril-Prothom Alo awards, ...""""http://www.thedailystar.net/i-love-the-title-ek-jiboner-shahid-shahid-37528 Wikipedia's article 15th Meril Prothom Alo Awards expresses it a little differently. It says he was nominated for the Best Singer (Male) Award for song """"Ek Jibon"""", but that was one of the songs on his solo album ''Nilambori''. """"Ek Jibon"""" is certainly what he is best known for in his solo career. The Meril Prothom Alo Awards are a big deal in film. I don't know if they would count as a major music award""" Deletion of Syed Shahid (singer) WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1189 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Call Me Lightning User:Chubbles 05:31, 9 September 2007 (UTC) keep Meets Criterion 5 of by the discography alone, and I don't see why I have to add anything else to keep it from being speedied. Nevertheless, I added three reviews by top-flight press agencies. If you want more, I'll go find them Deletion of Call Me Lightning WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1190 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam burke [[User: Allen3|Allen3]]'' [[User talk:Allen3|talk]] 20:59, 2 January 2007 (UTC) delete as per unless |reliable sources are provided in sufficient quantity to support the claims of the article and allow for the creation of a |neutral and verifiable article. While the fact that this person played a minor role in a minor movie is verifiable, the remainder of the article is pure |original research Deletion of Adam burke WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NPOV||WP:OR Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1191 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cambridge Student (2nd nomination) user:Andrew 11:34, 2 November 2020 (UTC) keep This is the newspaper of the Cambridge Students' Union and so the worst case would be merger into that page. Per , deletion is not appropriate Deletion of The Cambridge Student (2nd nomination) WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +1192 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Air characters User:Soetermans 09:32, 12 April 2016 (UTC) delete """A list of in-game characters without any sources fails . Just because does not mean it should stay. The main article might've passed GA, but this long, unsourced and trivial list wouldn't have made that possible. Wikipedia articles, also """"list of x characters"""", have to be properly sourced. Now, looking through /RS custom Google https://cse.google.com/cse/home?cx=003516479746865699832:leawcwkqifq search engine, using search terms like """"air characters"""", """"key air characters"""", """"air kano misuzu minagi"""", etc., does not bring up any in-depth sources. I also urge other editors in this discussion to look up possible sources first, before voting keep""" Deletion of List of Air characters WP:GNG||WP:ITEXISTS||WP:VG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1193 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George B. Schwartzman User:Enos733 02:24, 7 March 2014 (UTC) merge to 2003 California Recall. This is the usual outcome for losing candidates for a state/provencial-wide executive race per Deletion of George B. Schwartzman WP:POLOUTCOMES Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +1194 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/(Cry) All the Way Home User:Dhartung 20:08, 18 January 2007 (UTC) delete per and nomination. Strangely, it wasn't even bluelinked from Spinal Tap discography Deletion of (Cry) All the Way Home WP:FICT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1195 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dini Daniel [[User talk:Lourdes|Lourdes]]''' 09:14, 9 December 2017 (UTC) delete Perhaps some regional sources may exist that may convince me to change my !vote. My current search shows no reliable sources that can help push the subject over OR Deletion of Dini Daniel WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1196 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cindy Cohen User:Atama 18:30, 25 June 2009 (UTC) delete I have checked out the references on the page and while the number of references seem impressive at first glance, the references themselves don't meet . The only possible exception is the Columbus Dispatch, but that alone is not enough. Her only legitimate shaky claim to notability is as a contestant on a reality show, but unless more coverage can be found for that, she clearly fails Deletion of Cindy Cohen WP:RS||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1197 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1933–34 EAHL season User:Yosemiter 20:48, 14 April 2020 (UTC) delete """I have no access to read the full content of the articles I see on the archives, however, the titles of the articles do seem on the routine side. Without significant coverage outside of |simple records and stats, I have to lean on the """"Fails to meet GNG"""" side of this discussion. I would prefer if some the more generic records are added with sources to the EHL/EAHL page, like a simple list of champions by season, before we have a bunch of unsourced, and possibly unreliable, stats pages for each season""" Deletion of 1933–34 EAHL season WP:NOTSTATS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1198 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newfoundland and Labrador First Party User:DorisH 18:39, 12 March 2007 (UTC) keep I read the same way other users have done above and then I think any party that has gotten any votes in an election should be encyclopedic. However, I tend to support Arkyan's idea to have a Minor parties in Canada article Deletion of Newfoundland and Labrador First Party WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1199 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cancer.im User:Cazort 00:14, 14 September 2009 (UTC) delete I am also having trouble finding |reliable sources Deletion of Cancer.im WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1200 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philipp Fankhauser User:AddWittyNameHere 21:27, 30 August 2016 (UTC) keep very much satisfies #2 (single or album on any country's national chart). ''Love Man Riding'' peaked at #7 on the Swiss Album Chart http://www.swisscharts.com/album/Philipp-Fankhauser/Love-Man-Riding-87007 (official Swiss Charts site), ''Watching From The Safe Side'' peaked at #19 http://www.swisscharts.com/album/Philipp-Fankhauser/Watching-From-The-Safe-Side-32836 (same site), ''Try My Love'' at #3 http://www.swisscharts.com/album/Philipp-Fankhauser/Try-My-Love-146533 (same site), ''Home'' at #2 http://www.swisscharts.com/album/Philipp-Fankhauser/Home-252731 (here), ''Philipp Fankhauser Plays Montreux Jazz Festival'' at #7 http://www.swisscharts.com/album/Philipp-Fankhauser/Philipp-Fankhauser-Plays-Montreux-Jazz-Festival-214035 (still the same charts) and ''Philipp Fankhauser & Margie Evans - Unplugged - Live At Mühle Hunziken'' at #4 http://www.swisscharts.com/album/Philipp-Fankhauser-&-Margie-Evans/Unplugged-Live-At-Muehle-Hunziken-293446 (same Deletion of Philipp Fankhauser WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1201 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Ferry User:AuthorWiki99 10:48, 5 July 2019 (UTC) delete Not notable enough as per Deletion of Christopher Ferry WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1202 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Frank User:TedFrank 19:54, 26 August 2007 (UTC) comment I said I wasn't going to participate in this, but people keep asking my opinion, so I'm here to make a statement. The reality is that I cannot express an opinion because it will be spun against me either way: if I say the article should be kept, I will be accused of self-promotion, and if I say the article should be deleted, I will be accused of seeking some sort of cover up. I am certainly amused by the number of !votes that are plainly based on the assumption that I want the article deleted, and seriously considered casting a !vote for keep just to see how many people on both sides changed their mind. (So maybe I do want the article kept? Or am I just saying that to encourage delete votes?) I hope I have now sufficiently sown enough confusion about my hidden desires that editors will now be forced to make their decisions and discuss their reasoning on the basis of and other Wikipedia policies rather than lobbying for or against what I want Deletion of Ted Frank WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1203 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peru–Ukraine relations User:Edison 15:07, 22 April 2009 (UTC) delete Wikipedia is |not a collection of articles on miscellaneous juxtapositions of countries, nor a directory of which do or do not exchange diplomats. Fails |notability as well Deletion of Peru–Ukraine relations WP:NOT||WP:N Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1204 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eck Louvell User:Ged 16:01, 24 August 2008 (UTC) delete I don't think it's a hoax, but I can't find any ghit that isn't WP, one of the 'sources' provided doesn't actually refer to the phrase, and the other doesn't meet the criteria Deletion of Eck Louvell WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1205 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miroslav Barnyashev User:1292simon NONE delete Development wrestling category does not pass — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Deletion of Miroslav Barnyashev WP:ENTERTAINER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1206 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomono clan User:Cliff12345 18:36, 7 May 2013 (UTC) comment I have added as much information and as many sources as I could find for the article on the internet; I also agree with Michitaro's suggestion regarding checking published sources. I'll leave it to others to decide whether to remove the page or not. On second thoughts, given the lack of consensus on whether to delete the page (it's also been |relisted), I may have to put in my own opinion at some point Deletion of Tomono clan WP:RELIST Wikipedia:Deletion process 72 +1207 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Authors with mental illness User:Antivenin 05:41, 28 March 2009 (UTC) comment To be clear, this topic is perfectly notable/relevant per (which is a Wiki policy and not an essay like quoted above). However since this list cites barely any reliable sources, it should be '''deleted'''. I would, of course, prefer to '''keep''' this article with ''reliable sources added Deletion of Authors with mental illness WP:SALAT||WP:LISTCRUFT Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists 51 +1208 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bundaberg Christian College User:Lankiveil 04:03, 23 March 2014 (UTC) keep I don't agree at all with the reasoning that high schools should always be kept by virtue of being high schools. It will usually be the case that high schools will have the necessary secondary coverage to meet the , but not always, and the sources should be found first. With that said, this school's policy of being one of the last schools in Queensland where beating children was acceptable seems to have gotten it the required coverage, so the article should be kept Deletion of Bundaberg Christian College WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1209 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flavius Chişu User:Argyle 13:39, 11 October 2011 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Flavius Chişu WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1210 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karla Jurvetson User:RebeccaGreen 13:45, 25 November 2018 (UTC) delete """I am finding some coverage of a donation of US$5.4 million she made to Women Vote! in May this year. It was controversial as it was in stock in a Chinese company, see here https://www.recode.net/2018/8/20/17693048/silicon-valley-tech-donors-midterms-2018-democrats-donald-trump-list and here https://www.publicintegrity.org/2018/06/21/21873/democratic-super-pac-hits-jackpot-chinese-company-stock. This is not mentioned in the article. The ''Recode'' article does describe her as a """"little-known doctor from Los Altos"""", but wonders whether this is the start of large political donations. Perhaps """ Deletion of Karla Jurvetson WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +1211 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Adams (organist) User:Atlantic306 01:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC) keep as per the coverage identified in this discussion by Gerda that shows enough coverage for imv Deletion of Thomas Adams (organist) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1212 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AnaSpec User:A 05:04, 16 December 2008 (UTC) comment Please note that the company is covered substantially and not trivially or incidentally in multiple independent sources that are cited in the article's References section. I don't know about you, but in my book that passes Deletion of AnaSpec WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1213 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunil Sharma (2rd nomination) User:RayAYang 12:08, 11 March 2013 (UTC) delete per nom, arguably A7, since Chancellor is a purely ceremonial position per Chancellor (education), not qualifying for C6 - and there is some question about whether such a recently founded school, with a small student body, qualifies as a major academic institution in any sense. Searching for secondary sources via Gnews proved rather fruitless, but turned up lots of people with the same name, including a scholar at BU who may actually be notable, so fails anyhow Deletion of Sunil Sharma (2rd nomination) WP:PROF||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1214 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aziz Shavershian User:A412 03:10, 2 March 2012 (UTC) keep """Quoting the |GNG, """"If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list."""" It does not matter what he is being covered for, but that he is being covered. See - unless we are going to have an article titled """"Death of Aziz Shavershian"""", the article about him should be created instead. As for the content concerns, remember that |AFD is not cleanup""" Deletion of Aziz Shavershian WP:GNG||WP:1E||WP:NOTCLEANUP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1215 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Older Parthenon User:Akhilleus 16:05, 1 July 2007 (UTC) keep This should be a sub-article of Parthenon, in accordance with |summary style Deletion of Older Parthenon WP:SS Wikipedia:Summary style 23 +1216 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Perspectives on Human Sexuality User:Dennisthe2 01:29, 13 May 2007 (UTC) delete as |original research, not really POV. It gives a brief explanation to the issue at hand and doesn't really violate the NPOV clauses. I have to dissent with the need to salt this at this time; we'll cross that bridge if we come to it Deletion of Christian Perspectives on Human Sexuality WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +1217 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Whispering Woods User:Dream 07:48, 25 February 2010 (UTC) keep Article is well done, plenty of valid information to fill it. The suggested guidelines are not binding in any way. Policies are all that matters. |Ignore all rules clearly states if a rule gets in the way of improving Wikipedia, you ignore it. All guidelines were done by a small number of people, usually less than a handful at a time, without the rest of the Wikipedia noticing, and can't really be taken seriously. Note, am now copying this to several AFD, which are the same, nominated by the same person, with the same invalid argument about mindlessly following the guidelines passed by deletionists campers as an excuse to get rid of things they personally don't like Deletion of The Whispering Woods WP:IAR Wikipedia:Ignore all rules 63 +1218 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of MySpace Events User:Dacium 07:26, 3 May 2007 (UTC) delete it should at least pass Deletion of List of MySpace Events WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1219 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gordon Wagner (economist) User:Kraxler 14:01, 27 October 2014 (UTC) delete """Fails . Fails because none of sources are """"independent of the subject"""", almost all of them are from his employers, one is about his doctoral thesis. Just one of a myriad of university professors worldwide. Also see: Point 4. The LDS may highly esteem the late professor, but that doesn't establish notability""" Deletion of Gordon Wagner (economist) WP:ACADEMIC||WP:GNG||WP:NOTMEMORIAL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1220 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hai-Sha Ni User:CaliforniaAliBaba 08:59, 22 April 2007 (UTC) delete Dr. Ni is a controversial figure, so having an unsourced or poorly-sourced article about him is a violation of . An article |verifiable by reference to |multiple instances of non-trivial coverage in |reliable sources ''could'' be written about Dr. Ni, as demonstrated by Google searches above. However, the page as it stands is ''not'' such an article, and we lose absolutely nothing by deleting it. My vote changes to keep if the article is improved to the extent that most statements have inline citations to newspapers (either English newspapers or Chinese newspapers are fine Deletion of Hai-Sha Ni WP:LIVING||WP:V||WP:N||WP:RS Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +1221 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sathiala User:Oakshade 03:22, 5 January 2008 (UTC) keep Towns/villages are inherently notable regardless of size. Passes Deletion of Sathiala WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1222 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Ju Ae User:Green 14:34, 11 September 2013 (UTC) comment This AfD really should be procedurally closed since it's a clear of Kim Ju-ae, it's the same article. We can't vote merge or delete for this article since the article already exists elsewhere which is not under AfD. This AfD should have never happened, I don't think the nom realized there was a fork condition Deletion of Kim Ju Ae WP:FORK Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks 84 +1223 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bus routes in the West Midlands county User:Imzadi1979 00:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC) delete fails and . Lists like these should be transwikied to Wikivoyage rather than left on Wikipedia Deletion of List of bus routes in the West Midlands county WP:GNG||WP:NOTTRAVEL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1224 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Young (singer) User:Jersey92 20:27, 5 July 2014 (UTC) delete Promotional article. Not sufficiently notable. At best this is and should still be deleted Deletion of Alex Young (singer) WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +1225 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Last Days of Blink-182 User:Nouse4aname 13:59, 3 December 2008 (UTC) delete Fails . Doesn't seem to exist. Should be a speedy, but not sure if any are relevant Deletion of Last Days of Blink-182 WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1226 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Quinteros User:Ryan 14:56, 3 May 2007 (UTC) delete http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=%22Victor+Quinteros%22+peru&meta= 65 g-hits, non on them |reliable sources Deletion of Victor Quinteros WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1227 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamerlan Tsarnaev and Dzhokar Tsarnaev User:Coffeepusher 19:01, 20 April 2013 (UTC) delete and redirect. this is definitely a |Content fork of which the notable information is already in the main article Deletion of Tamerlan Tsarnaev and Dzhokar Tsarnaev WP:CFORK Wikipedia:Content forking 33 +1228 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 United States presidential election controversies and attacks NONE NONE keep """Biophys (""""criticism is good"""" is not an inclusion criterium), JeremyMcCracken and Everyking (""" Deletion of 2008 United States presidential election controversies and attacks WP:USEFUL Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +1229 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of entomology journals User:Andyjsmith 22:56, 1 July 2007 (UTC) comment This is well covered at . The essential question for any encyclopedia article is what useful information it conveys. This article lists the names of many journals but gives ''no information whatsoever'' about them, not even how to find them. Does this article actually tell anyone anything useful? If the name of one of these journals was replaced with The Beano would it alter the information content of the article? Compare with List of scientific journals in chemistry which has a ''ranked'' list of external links together with references to analyses of citations Deletion of List of entomology journals WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1230 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FIFA 09 User:TenPoundHammer 18:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC) delete as with no content whatsoever Deletion of FIFA 09 WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1231 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 India–Pakistan military confrontation User:NadirAli 19:34, 1 October 2016 (UTC) comment """If such an incident is not supported by a diverse international media and more importantly evidence, it should be stated that this was claimed and not written as some sort of """"proof"""". And I argue this the same for the so-called Osama Bin Laden killing which till this day has not been supported by any sufficient evidence aside from American government an media claims. That article should just state the name of the operation and include affirmative and negative arguments. Otherwise NPOV is pretty much dead or lost to |democracy""" Deletion of 2016 India–Pakistan military confrontation WP:DEM Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1232 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweere-arse (2nd nomination) User:Jbhunley 20:18, 7 September 2015 (UTC) delete per . No evidence this term was widely used or has any particular significance. Fails Deletion of Sweere-arse (2nd nomination) WP:NOTDICTIONARY||WP:GNG Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1233 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memory Lane (Sittin' in da Park) User:Esradekan 03:52, 7 August 2008 (UTC) delete fails notability per #Songs Deletion of Memory Lane (Sittin' in da Park) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1234 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navy Field (2nd nomination) User:Sloane 01:49, 31 March 2011 (UTC) comment """Let's look at the ''three'' sources again. http://mmohut.com/review/navy-field is a review from a site pretty much run by two brothers http://mmohut.com/about, so it fails (""""Base articles on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Sources should directly support the material presented in an article and should be appropriate to the claims made. The appropriateness of any source depends on the context. In general, the best sources have a professional structure in place for checking or analyzing facts, legal issues, evidence, and arguments; as a rule of thumb, the greater the degree of scrutiny given to these issues, the more reliable the source."""") http://www.mmortsgamers.com/reviews/mmo-rts/navyfield-us.html offers a TWO sentence review, and is a site run by probably one person, again failing . http://www.subsim.com/ssr/navy_field/review_navy_field_subs.php seems to be the only site that perhaps has some editorial oversight. But it's still a weak source. This article clearly doesn't meet """ Deletion of Navy Field (2nd nomination) WP:V||WP:V||WP:NOTE Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1235 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grant Blackwood User:Cerebellum 15:54, 24 February 2010 (UTC) comment """I found http://thecelebritycafe.com/books/full_review/156.html this, which contains the sentence """"Grant Blackwood wrote with such visual excitement and the details of his characters' surroundings are sharp, clean, and chillingly alive with frightening realism that I found myself to be there in the middle of it all,"""" (significant critical attention per ? You decide.) and my google news search turned up http://moreresults.factiva.com/results/index/index.aspx?ref=EVEEXP0020051110e1b90000c another story as well, but the link is dead. I'll see if I can turn up anything else""" Deletion of Grant Blackwood WP:CREATIVE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1236 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Billion User:Joe 23:02, 24 October 2009 (UTC) delete All that I can find for significant coverage is http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117793271.html?categoryid=31&cs=1 this. Fails Deletion of Mr. Billion WP:NF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1237 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Management consulting conference User:Nuujinn 19:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC) delete no references establishing Deletion of Management consulting conference WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1238 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of video game emulators User:Rhododendrites 18:58, 27 September 2018 (UTC) keep Nothing resembling a valid reason for deletion given. Just like the list of guitarists or list of social networking websites do not list every person who plays guitar or every social networking website that exists, so this is a directory of every emulator that exists or otherwise an Emulator Wikia. That you don't like it is not a good reason for deletion. &mdash Deletion of List of video game emulators WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1239 """Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Got a """"D"""" in Salami""" User:ManicSpider 11:27, 9 February 2011 (UTC) keep This book seems to me to be notable. It is recommended reading for teaching learning disabilities in the classroom http://books.google.com.au/books?id=Ctx9gC9tLEAC&lpg=PA78&dq=%22I%20Got%20a%20%22D%22%20in%20Salami%22&pg=PA78#v=onepage&q=%22I%20Got%20a%20%22D%22%20in%20Salami%22&f=false here, it was also used http://books.google.com.au/books?id=uuvX5Gpbx9UC&lpg=PA184&dq=%22I%20Got%20a%20%22D%22%20in%20Salami%22&pg=PA184#v=onepage&q=%22I%20Got%20a%20%22D%22%20in%20Salami%22&f=falsehere as a teaching resource for reading cognition, is mentioned as a high-interest resource in http://books.google.com.au/books?id=rdm5BrFHOg8C&lpg=PA39&dq=%22I%20Got%20a%20%22D%22%20in%20Salami%22&pg=PA39#v=onepage&q=%22I%20Got%20a%20%22D%22%20in%20Salami%22&f=false this book on teaching kids with trouble reading and it was mentioned in the article ''Fictional Characters with Dyslexia: What Are We Seeing in Books?'' and in the book ''Children's Book Corner: A Read-Aloud Resource with Tips, Techniques, and Plans for Teachers, Librarians, and Parents : Level Grades 3 and 4'' but I can't access those because of paywalls. The same for the articles available on a Google News Archive search. Meets #4 """Deletion of I Got a """"D"""" in Salami""" WP:NBOOKS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1240 """Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Santa Rosa de Copán, """"Los Llanos""""""" User:Chris 20:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC) delete Fails . This is unreferenced promotional junk. The creator, {{u|Vitrubius32}}, indicates on their user page that they might be the author of same. The version on es-wiki should be deleted, too """Deletion of History of Santa Rosa de Copán, """"Los Llanos""""""" WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1241 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hosted Network User:Trysha 18:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC) delete A non-notable company that fails . Seems like an advertisement. Nothing in the media seems to have ever referenced this company other than their own press releases Deletion of Hosted Network WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1242 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samples of sans serif typefaces User:Batard0 07:48, 20 October 2012 (UTC) keep This is a list, and thus should be titled '''List of sans serif typefaces'''. As a list, it clearly meets . These typefaces have been treated ''as a group'' in multiple books, like http://books.google.ae/books?id=FUXhAAAAMAAJ&q=sans+serif+typefaces&dq=sans+serif+typefaces&source=bl&ots=HknH9SacoQ&sig=6Q7GGRmaOON0_wCxt7jk4qexStI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Q1aCUKLeE8TKrAeliYHQCg&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAQ this one and http://books.google.ae/books?id=FiJ87ixLs0sC&pg=PA324&lpg=PA324&dq=sans+serif+typefaces&source=bl&ots=iIl6h5Ol9o&sig=wkGRsFS3ttzQcryfhOErITRyo0Y&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Q1aCUKLeE8TKrAeliYHQCg&ved=0CFwQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=sans%20serif%20typefaces&f=false this one. The inclusion criteria are sufficiently clear and narrow from the title. Could be merged into List of typefaces if that seems more prudent, but given the potential size of this list it may be better to put a sampling of typefaces in the List of typefaces article and have separate ones for the various kinds of typefaces that are more comprehensive Deletion of Samples of sans serif typefaces WP:LISTN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1243 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007–08 Commonwealth Bank Series statistics User:BlackJack 10:20, 7 October 2017 (UTC) delete per Ian. . No point in merging with tournament article as that would breach NOTSTATS then Deletion of 2007–08 Commonwealth Bank Series statistics WP:NOTSTATS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1244 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Hardy (professional boxer) User:Papaursa 18:48, 27 July 2013 (UTC) delete I see nothing that shows notability. He obviously fails to meet and I don't see the coverage necessary to meet Deletion of Anthony Hardy (professional boxer) WP:NBOX||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1245 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerim Memija (2nd nomination) User:Davey2010 21:53, 7 January 2016 (UTC) delete fails . and Deletion of Kerim Memija (2nd nomination) WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1246 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modulus Global User:CNMall41 03:16, 9 October 2015 (UTC) delete There are a ton of press releases but nothing I see in depth. In fact, there is very little coverage at all. Fails Deletion of Modulus Global WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1247 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Chernyakhovsky User:Guillaume2303 09:03, 12 April 2012 (UTC) delete Not an A7 (given the asteroid), but otherwise way too soon. Misses and by a mile Deletion of Alexander Chernyakhovsky WP:PROF||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1248 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SilverBuildIT User:Ihcoyc 14:23, 10 October 2011 (UTC) delete Article about ''|a multinational IT Company'' that tells us that ''was started by building web applications for companies'' but ''expanded to making applications for iPhone and Android... and Facebook'' and that the ''founders of the company are a team of entrepreneurs with more than 10 years of experience from IT, Telecom, Finance and Customer Service.'' Yes, but what do these things '''''do'''''? #G11|Unambiguous advertising and #A7|no minimal claim to encyclopedic importance. So tagged Deletion of SilverBuildIT WP:B2B||WP:CSD||WP:CSD Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1249 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Devotion Bidwell User:Gene93k 21:30, 12 August 2008 (UTC) delete per . Straight genealogy associated with a historic place. I might consider merging Bidwell to Rev. Adonijah Bidwell House if could be satisfied Deletion of John Devotion Bidwell WP:NOT||WP:V Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1250 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liam Rawrd User:FreeRangeFrog 00:18, 3 March 2009 (UTC) delete Vanity page and general failure to meet . Unless the subject or someone else can point to something that proves he is a ''noted'' human rights activist (as claimed) or notable for something ''other'' than the usual MySpace fame Deletion of Liam Rawrd WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1251 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Key User:Pharaoh 04:17, 28 September 2014 (UTC) delete Clearly fails both and Deletion of Mr. Key WP:N||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1252 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Puffy AmiYumi tours User:onel5969 23:14, 28 April 2017 (UTC) delete as per . Any citable info can be merged Deletion of List of Puffy AmiYumi tours WP:INDISCRIMINATE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1253 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddie Anaclet User:Number 16:58, 13 October 2007 (UTC) delete Has not played in a fully-professional league ( Deletion of Eddie Anaclet WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1254 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bombhunters User:MichaelQSchmidt 19:25, 2 August 2009 (UTC) comment I have just completed a first round of cleanup and sourcing. Article meets the Deletion of Bombhunters WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1255 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Spearing (2nd nomination) User:Otolemur 16:51, 17 February 2008 (UTC) delete per nom, fails Deletion of Jay Spearing (2nd nomination) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1256 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nassau Royal User:Robofish 22:20, 30 May 2011 (UTC) delete I agree with the nominator that he doesn't seem to satisfy at this time. I can't find significant coverage in reliable sources either Deletion of Nassau Royal WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1257 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kotick Marketing Group (2nd nomination) User:Ihcoyc 16:42, 13 October 2009 (UTC) delete would say '''speedy delete''' as #G11|blatant advertising, but for a 2d AfD it may be best to set a firm precedent here. This is a ''full-service, multi-dimensional marketing firm''. Oonh, it's '''''multi-dimensional''''' we are, is it? What dimensions do you practice in besides this one? ''The agency’s focus lies in the strategic development of numerous industry brands and the creation of integrated marketing campaigns and promotions for Business-to-Business (B2B) and Business-to-Consumer (B2C) clients.'' In other words, empty Deletion of Kotick Marketing Group (2nd nomination) WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +1258 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citizen of the several states User:Torchwoodwho 10:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC) delete In the most accepted legal definition Citizen of the Several States refers only to what would equate to, in modern terms, as federal citizens. At the time the phrase was in use the colonies had declared independence but not ratified a constitution, therefore no better legal phrase to describe a federal citizenship existed http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/twoclass.htm. This article, while it presents an interesting interpretation of the law is nothing but and . I don't think there is enough non-controversial information presented in this article to allow for anything beyond stubbing if clean-up was attempted, therefor I suggest deletion Deletion of Citizen of the several states WP:SOAP||WP:POV Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1259 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masroor International Cricket Tournament User:Mtking 07:51, 1 July 2011 (UTC) delete Lacks coverage in |reliable sources so fails Deletion of Masroor International Cricket Tournament WP:RS||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1260 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transracial identity User:Skyerise 01:23, 17 June 2015 (UTC) delete per and Deletion of Transracial identity WP:NEOLOGISM||WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +1261 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. Johnston User:David 22:23, 13 May 2016 (UTC) delete """I had noticed the same thing as DGG and held off commenting until now because of it. Her top-cited paper in Google scholar (""""Strange-quark contributions"""") has a citation-to-author ratio of less than three, and she appears in a middling position, so it is difficult to find a convincing case for notability via #C1. Directing a center is not an indication of notability (huge numbers of academics do this, basically because it sounds more impressive to call your group of grad students a center than to call them your group of grad students). And the Sigma Xi award appears to be very local, something that they give on a per-chapter (that is, per-university) basis rather than a national-level award, and has no sources independent of Johnston herself. So I don't see a basis for notability""" Deletion of K. Johnston WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1262 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indians in Afghanistan User:Northamerica1000 08:39, 10 January 2012 (UTC) keep The article in its current state is well-sourced, and the topic itself appears notable. and neutral point-of-view concerns expressed in this AfD discussion can be addressed on the article's talk page and through editing, rather than entirely removing the article from Wikipedia Deletion of Indians in Afghanistan WP:COATRACK Wikipedia:Coatrack articles 47 +1263 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pietra Wexstun User:Missvain 18:32, 21 May 2021 (UTC) delete I could not find anything to establish nor . I suppose another option could be to '''redirect''' Pietra Wexstun to Stan Ridgeway as an lternative to deletion Deletion of Pietra Wexstun WP:GNG||WP:BAND||WP:A Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1264 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pataki full User:Northamerica1000 05:47, 12 January 2017 (UTC) delete Per source searches, does not meet and finding no evidence of being met. Source searches are only providing passing mentions (e.g. https://books.google.com/books?id=eJ5tBAAAQBAJ&pg=PT378&lpg=PT378&dq=%22Pataki+full%22+-wikipedia&source=bl&ots=mPw4O9Lite&sig=rTXL5FX98LGWKSLW00tHfOAqaik&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjGjaTT87vRAhUIw1QKHT7hBoIQ6AEInwEwGQ#v=onepage&q=%22Pataki%20full%22%20-wikipedia&f=false, https://books.google.com/books?id=Zxmuu7MrJT8C&pg=PA266&lpg=PA266&dq=%22Pataki+full%22+-wikipedia&source=bl&ots=_yDSh3pVjb&sig=ZA-L3rIOe4ddctfLdQc2rSQDPk8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjGjaTT87vRAhUIw1QKHT7hBoIQ6AEIsAEwHQ#v=onepage&q=%22Pataki%20full%22%20-wikipedia&f=false Deletion of Pataki full WP:GNG||WP:BOOKCRIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1265 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The band Element 115 User:Pete 05:47, 21 January 2008 (UTC) delete """fails . No charted hit, record certified gold or higher, international tours or major music award, not even close. Plus: not """"two or more albums on a major label"""", or """"subject of a half hour or longer broadcast across a national ... network"""" not close, just not close, to the standard of """"extensive coverage by reliable secondary sources"""" required by """ Deletion of The band Element 115 WP:BAND||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1266 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magdalen Berns (2nd nomination) User:Timtrent 17:20, 4 June 2021 (UTC) comment There is no validity to well meaning thinking on . The outcome, while ''likely'' is not ''indisputable''. This renders a speedy/snow close to be unwise. The article on Berns deserves a full discussion. If not then Wikijustice will not be seen to be done Deletion of Magdalen Berns (2nd nomination) WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +1267 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misty Woods User:Pontificalibus 14:57, 6 September 2017 (UTC) delete Doesn't meet , and nor would the Ju Ju Babies Deletion of Misty Woods WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1268 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isabella Cramp User:Bearian 17:50, 5 May 2014 (UTC) delete per , we often delete BLPs of child actors who have only had minor roles Deletion of Isabella Cramp WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1269 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Bull User:Stevie 09:08, 26 March 2021 (UTC) delete Fails which supersedes any presumed notability. |Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Including *every* cricketer who played in two matches and did *nothing* else is not for Wikipedia. NCRIC is only a soft rule which presumes there will be other sources to establish a cricketer's notability over and above the standard statistical sites but not every one/two/three appearance wonder does generate significant coverage. Most of them don't Deletion of G. Bull WP:GNG||WP:INDISCRIMINATE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1270 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dread Central (2nd nomination) User:Wafulz 20:01, 16 July 2007 (UTC) delete """The sources provided do not """"feature"""" Dread Central- they quote one sentence from it. Doesn't seem to meet |notability guidelines for web content, and doesn't have any |independent non-trivial reliable sources""" Deletion of Dread Central (2nd nomination) WP:WEB||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1271 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Safoora Zargar User:Stifle 14:52, 28 May 2020 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Safoora Zargar WP:BIO1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1272 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/War (Swedish band) User:4meter4 01:57, 28 September 2019 (UTC) delete Fails and therefore . The sources cited are not reliable per wikipedia's standards for verifiability and therefore, the subject does not meet the criteria at . Sources independent of the subject are needed to verify that content in order for the article to be kept Deletion of War (Swedish band) WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG||WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1273 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of clubs and societies of the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology User:Ajf773 21:18, 8 January 2017 (UTC) delete per . Wikipedia is not a university enrolment guide nor a directory of social clubs, none of which are notable Deletion of List of clubs and societies of the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1274 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sitanshu Yashaschandra User:Rpclod 22:14, 19 July 2014 (UTC) keep I think that Nizil saved this article by demonstrating substantial coverage. As such, the subject meets among other criteria Deletion of Sitanshu Yashaschandra WP:SCHOLAR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1275 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gunners Greatest 50 Players User:Bettia 12:16, 8 January 2009 (UTC) delete An unencyclopaedic article based entirely on opinion. Although there's no doubt that these players are great, there's no set grounds given for their inclusion or ranking. It would be almost impossible to make this conform to Wikipedia standards, especially and Deletion of Gunners Greatest 50 Players WP:OR||WP:NPOV Wikipedia:No original research 12 +1276 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rod of Seven Parts (2nd nomination) User:Lankiveil 13:18, 24 December 2007 (UTC) delete it's bad form to renom so quickly, but while we're here I think that it's worth pointing out that this particular artefact does not appear to have any notability outside of the D&D universe. Wikipedia is a roleplaying source book Deletion of Rod of Seven Parts (2nd nomination) WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1277 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Null (scanlation) User:Ultra 07:51, 14 October 2006 (UTC) delete 11,700 http://www.google.com/search?q=Null+scanlation+-wikipedia ghits, a poor http://alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?url=http://n-u-l-l.net/ alexa ranking, no verifiability, (an entrance on another wiki does ''not'' make it verifiable and the other link provided has barely any information on it), and a failure of Deletion of Null (scanlation) WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1278 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HP Stream 7 User:SSTflyer 07:37, 8 December 2015 (UTC) keep obviously meets Deletion of HP Stream 7 WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1279 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine NONE NONE comment I have looked at all the references for SCIMD-COM, and some statements made in the article based on those references. The majority of references are either (a) self published, (b) lists giving no significant coverage of the subject, (c) criteria from which inferences are being drawn . One reference mentions the subject superficially whilst discussing another medical school, one I can not check (requires subscription) and one appears to be a valid in-depth coverage of the college. Here's the breakdown by reference number in the current article Deletion of St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine WP:NOR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +1280 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Caps (band) User:A 19:49, 10 April 2011 (UTC) comment """It would seem that the most common rationale for keeping the All Caps article from the """"Do Not Delete"""" !voters is that they are extensively covered by media outside the """"mainstream"""". While this may or may not be true, the advantage that mainstream media has over, say, blogs or YouTube is that it is generally more reliable and trustworthy, due to its rigorous fact-checking and editorial oversight. We need to use only reliable, third-party sources on Wikipedia to make sure that what we are publishing is verifiably accurate. Anybody can edit, for example, Last.fm and alter it to say whatever they want it to, hence why we can't use http://www.last.fm/music/All+Caps to determine notability. Also, having over 26,000 YouTube subscribers doesn't in and of itself make a band notable, per . It should perhaps also be noted that a large number of the """"Do Not Delete"""" !voters have made few or no contributions outside this AfD""" Deletion of All Caps (band) WP:BIGNUMBER Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +1281 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gunwitch User:Dissolva 06:36, 20 March 2008 (UTC) comment Deletion discussions are not a vote, but a discussion to establish |concensus if an article deserves inclusion in Wikipedia. Mentions on web sites and unpublished claims of influence do not establish |notability or meet the need for reliable sources for a #Sources|biography of a living person Deletion of Gunwitch WP:CONCENSUS||WP:N||WP:BLP Wikipedia:Consensus 93 +1282 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Learn direct (film) User:MichaelQSchmidt 22:34, 23 February 2013 (UTC) delete lacks |verifiability and feels of hoax. Of course, an indie or student film of extreme low budget ''might'' lack requisite coverage without actually being a hoax... but for this one, there is nothing at all... in RS or non-RS Deletion of Learn direct (film) WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1283 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Graphics Institute NONE 05:53, 19 November 2009 (UTC) keep per and meets . Their conference attracts speakers like Michael Eisner, Al Gore, and Marissa Mayer which should be enough to meet and it is much larger than MIX_(Microsoft). Their large number of current books published by Wiley_Publishing also meets . Edward Dewey Deletion of American Graphics Institute WP:HEY||WP:V||WP:N||WP:N Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard 85 +1284 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Am a Hotel User:Pastor 23:39, 7 July 2009 (UTC) keep The article meets standards. As an FYI, short films have a long history of artistic and social notability Deletion of I Am a Hotel WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1285 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Monk and the Man Who Shot Santa User:DHowell 22:35, 21 December 2007 (UTC) keep per |significant coverage in multiple reliable sources: http://www.nwanews.com/adg/Style/209808/ Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=90186 Chicago Daily Herald, http://www.cinemablend.com/television/TV-Review-Monk-Mr-Monk-And-The-Man-Who-Shot-Santa-7554.html CinemaBlend, and http://www.buddytv.com/articles/monk/monk-returns-tonight-for-a-hol-14521.aspx BuddyTV Deletion of Mr. Monk and the Man Who Shot Santa WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1286 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eisenhower Tree User:Viriditas 02:25, 21 February 2014 (UTC) keep as a separate article about the tree. Is the nominator the least bit familiar with ? If not, they should stay away from AfD until they've read and understood it. The Eisenhower Tree is a notable American landmark in the world of golf Deletion of Eisenhower Tree WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +1287 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newton Crosby User:MaskedSinger 09:37, 5 July 2019 (UTC) delete fails both and . Can't believe it was created almost 15 years ago Deletion of Newton Crosby WP:GNG||WP:UNSOURCED Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1288 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Abhijeet Nath and Nilotpal Das User:FR30799386 14:08, 16 June 2018 (UTC) delete Six months later the subject will not even warrant a footnote in the main article... applies here. —  Deletion of Death of Abhijeet Nath and Nilotpal Das WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1289 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Sean User:AmaryllisGardener 16:51, 28 November 2014 (UTC) keep Seems to pass Deletion of Christopher Sean WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1290 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Brazell User:4meter4 14:13, 27 September 2019 (UTC) delete What's disturbing here is that some of the cited online references do not contain the information they are supposed to be supporting. (such as the second source cited which doesn't even mention the subject). This makes me question whether the veracity of the offline source can be assumed in good faith, if some of the sources online have nothing at all to do with the content they are supposed to verifying. The other online sources, other than the one spanish langauge source, are all tangential. Fails and Deletion of Robert Brazell WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1291 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kekkei genkai User:Doctorfluffy 02:09, 3 November 2007 (UTC) delete Regardless of how notable this may be in-universe, there are still no reliable secondary sources to indicate notability per Deletion of Kekkei genkai WP:FICT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1292 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAGA (pop band) User:SSTflyer 11:14, 27 December 2015 (UTC) delete No evidence this passes Deletion of SAGA (pop band) WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1293 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fixing America User:MichaelQSchmidt 06:27, 5 September 2015 (UTC) keep per it already https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fixing_America#References having sources speaking about the production and thus showing the project as specifically meeting . I do not have to watch it or care one little bit about what it purports to document, as |film notability is found through ''just enough'' coverage Deletion of Fixing America WP:NF||WP:NF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1294 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man, Myth & Magic (role-playing game) User:Coolabahapple 14:38, 14 August 2018 (UTC) keep meets , reviews in the gaming magazines listed above are sufficient Deletion of Man, Myth & Magic (role-playing game) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1295 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scroffice User:Part 14:42, 21 February 2007 (UTC) delete obvious issues. Just prod this kind of crap; it's not worth even afding it Deletion of Scroffice WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +1296 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omofo User:Quarl NONE delete as |non-notable podcast. Reposting it later when it is notable is a good idea. &mdash Deletion of Omofo WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1297 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Sneddon (kidnap victim) User:Michitaro 01:36, 25 August 2013 (UTC) delete """The issue really revolves around the conditions outlined in and . If one believes there should be an article, should it be about the victim or about the event? """"When an individual plays a major role in a minor event"""" (as is the case here) """"it is not generally appropriate to have an article on both the person and the event."""" Currently there is only an article on the person. But in this case, the individual is only known through the event, and is also a """"low profile individual"""" according to . This, and the low significance of the event, seems to satisfy the three conditions of , which then recommends only mentioning the individual in the event article. But the problem we face here is judging whether there really has been an event. The anonymous IP's arguments that such an event is impossible are poorly supported if not spurious. Given past kidnappings, it is clearly in the realm of possibility and the press coverage that exists entertains the possibility as a realistic one. But even the WSJ article, which strongly leans towards asserting the kidnapping really happened, does not declare it outright. BLP1E moves us to merge the individual into the event article, but for Wikipedia to have an article on an event that may not have happened--and even provide an article title that definitely asserts it did happen--is problematic and touches on issues of and . One would need considerably more coverage out there to justify an article on an event that may not have happened. At best this is """ Deletion of David Sneddon (kidnap victim) WP:BIO1E||WP:BLP1E||WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1298 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voice (recording artist) [[User talk:68.183.55.64|talk]]) 01:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC) delete subject doesn't come close to meeting requirements of ; blatant advertisement that appears to have been written by the subject or someone associated with her. -- Special:Contributions/68.183.55.64|68.183.55.64 Deletion of Voice (recording artist) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1299 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of YouTubers (3rd nomination) User:Hijiri88 11:37, 30 April 2018 (UTC) comment noping|Fishhead2100}} should probably be warned about if they haven't already. Even if https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&dir=prev&offset=20180429190210&limit=129&contribs=user&target=Fishhead2100&namespace=3&tagfilter=&start=&end= these 129 identical messages were sent indiscriminately to all commenters on both sides of the previous AFDs (many of which are very old and date to a time when canvassing was for some reason considered acceptable as long as it was in favour of keeping articles that were at AFD, so they aren't a reliable precedent anyway), the wording of the message was blatantly non-neutral Deletion of List of YouTubers (3rd nomination) WP:CANVAS Wikipedia:Canvassing 30 +1300 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pippa Middleton User:Cindamuse 20:36, 18 February 2011 (UTC) delete Notability is not established independent of her sister, Kate Middleton. References provided tend to focus on Kate, while offering peripheral mentions of the subject of this article. If the subject was not related to the future wife of Prince William, the subject of this article would not merit coverage. See Deletion of Pippa Middleton WP:NOTINHERITED Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +1301 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Bushyhead User:Dsmdgold 20:50, 18 February 2008 (UTC) keep """meets the general |notability criteria, 2 sources already referenced in article, '''Bláthnaid''' found an additional two. Note that notability comes as from being one of the leaders of the Cherokees during the Trail of Tears not from being a """"religious leader"""". (Full disclosure, I created the intial version of this article""" Deletion of Jesse Bushyhead WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1302 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gundisalvus of Lagos User:Necrothesp 10:09, 11 August 2021 (UTC) keep Passes and although not canonised, he has been beatified. That's enough for notability Deletion of Gundisalvus of Lagos WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1303 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jibber Skabing User:Beano 23:15, 25 October 2008 (UTC) delete Fails and . I honestly would not have any objection if someone |G1'd this article Deletion of Jibber Skabing WP:N||WP:CS||WP:PN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1304 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Ng NONE NONE comment I find it a bit humorous the way some WP-folk deal with other editors they use , , , , , , digging through a users contributions like an overly zealous proctologist and many others in their arsenal of weapons to submit their opponents to their will (much the same way I would a challenger in the ring). I say don’t be a ... I admit I have many flaws, I am a ass sometimes, as well I’m a prankster. I really don’t know my ass from a hole in the ground here in wickipedia (there is a hell of a learning curve; and I’m not getting payed as some people on this site). So If I hurt someone feelings by my word choices let me say I’m from the bottom of my heart (with sugar on top). Now can we act like grown men with a set of brass balls and not panzy-metrosexul ? Because I really don’t give a Deletion of John Ng WP:AFD||WP:COI||WP:NPOV||WP:VAND||WP:OR||WP:BIO||WP:SORRY||WP:MASTODONS||WP:FUCK||WP:dick Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +1305 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 NHL Outdoor Games NONE NONE keep There is significant coverage in multiple, reliable independent sources so is clearly met. And these sources are major outlets: in addition to ESPN and USA Today other sources to cover this are Sportsnet https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/article/nhl-planning-two-outdoor-games-lake-tahoe-2021-season/, Bleacher Report https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2924959-nhl-reportedly-planning-2-outdoor-games-at-lake-tahoe-during-2021-season, and The Athletic https://theathletic.com/2296327/2021/01/01/all-the-details-of-nhls-outdoor-games-at-lake-tahoe/; plus the local Reno Gazette-Journal https://www.rgj.com/story/sports/2021/01/01/nhl-lake-tahoe-outdoor-game-edgewood-tahoe-resort-avalanche-golden-knights-flyers-bruins-schedule/4108388001/. All these are independent articles, not just the same Associated Press blurb Deletion of 2021 NHL Outdoor Games WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1306 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Durham Union Society User:The 23:37, 9 October 2014 (UTC) delete to List of social activities at Durham University#Durham Union Society. Does not meet so not separately notable. What has happened is that following the merge pursuant to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Durham Union Society this article has been created as a copy and paste from the original article causing attribution issues (hence delete first). Clearly, there is no need for a merge because the merge was previously carried out Deletion of The Durham Union Society WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1307 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progressive Bloggers (2nd nomination) User:MaNeMeBasat 14:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Progressive Bloggers (2nd nomination) WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1308 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eko Hotels and Suites User:Smartse 14:11, 3 April 2016 (UTC) delete """Like restaurants, hotels are bound to be mentioned in published sources of some form as this is an essential part of generating business. However to be included we need some sources which provide more than the run-of-the-mill reviews and these do not appear to exist. Trip Advisor is obviously of no use for demonstrating that is met. I also share Takeaways concerns about where the content came from as the https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eko_Hotels_and_Suites&oldid=668246068 first version appears to have copied content from http://www.africatravelsguide.com/nigeria/lemeridienekohotelandsuites/ this site. e.g. article: """"serves sizzling hot barbecues and grills spiced with suya."""" source: """"sizzling hot barbecues and grills spiced with suya are served to your taste."""" etc""" Deletion of Eko Hotels and Suites WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1309 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gloria Campaner User:RebeccaGreen 14:40, 4 November 2018 (UTC) keep The article states that she has won prizes at major international competitions, and Criterion 9 of is: Has won first, second or third place in a major music competition. So she does meet . Sources can be found online - eg re the Paderewski Competition this http://ijpaderewski.org/wpd/author/ignacy/ or this https://www.poloniasf.org/english/images/nop201006s4.pdf, her profile on the Borletti-Buitoni Trust, from which she won a £20,000 fellowship in 2014 https://www.bbtrust.com/2014/fellowships/gloria_campaner_1.html?view=biography, possibly this interview in Avvenire https://www.avvenire.it/agora/pagine/gloria-campaner-pianista (I don't know what constitutes reliable sources in Italy) - and there are other articles, like this one about her becoming artistic director of a musical association https://www.tempostretto.it/news/musica-gloria-campaner-nuovo-direttore-artistico-associazione-bellini.html, and I'm sure it would be possible to find reviews of performances, particularly searching in Italian, Greek, etc Deletion of Gloria Campaner WP:MUSICBIO||WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1310 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Sharpe (WCSC-TV) User:Baileypalblue 06:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC) keep award-winning, widely-respected news anchor meets the requirements of . I have added |reliable sources to the article to satisfy #General notability guideline|the general notability guideline Deletion of Bill Sharpe (WCSC-TV) WP:BIO||WP:RS||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1311 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher C. Harmon User:Sonofstar 16:42, 17 April 2021 (UTC) keep per Deletion of Christopher C. Harmon WP:NPROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1312 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Safoora Zargar User:Sturdyankit 12:05, 21 May 2020 (UTC) delete most of content isn't cited with reliable source, a very few sources are cited with indepent or reliable websites, I think the subject isn't notable enough (yet) to be here as per ; many part of this article have no any refrance seems editor's interest e.g the first para. of controversy section where the editor mentioned porn actress, her allegations and all that, also for her husband a very few result are showing and however it is clear, the subject covered a few media coverage on internet but not notable (yet), Thanks Deletion of Safoora Zargar WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1313 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaby Borges User:Kudpung 04:02, 4 September 2016 (UTC) delete fails to meet criteria at and . If this person were notable there would be more on the Internet than the usual raft of sn sites and IMDB, none of which are considered eliable sources for the purpose of asserting notability Deletion of Gaby Borges WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:R Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1314 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharon D. Allen (author) User:DARTH 17:42, 30 November 2010 (UTC) delete fails and , non-notable Deletion of Sharon D. Allen (author) WP:BIO||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1315 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turning points during World War II User:Bungle 19:55, 18 July 2021 (UTC) delete on the basis of my view above and the admission by Loafiewa that this is |opinion driven Deletion of Turning points during World War II WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +1316 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Hopp User:Qrsdogg 17:28, 31 May 2011 (UTC) delete A couple trivial mentions, but doesn't seem to meet Deletion of Jeff Hopp WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1317 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Amanda Froistad User:Defendingaa 05:14, 20 February 2019 (UTC) keep as the article's creator. The extensive references unquestionably establish |notability. Keep in mind that this murder is '''not''' only notable as being an example of the Bystander Effect (as a couple delete votes incorrectly state); it is also notable and described in reliable third party sources as being an example of someone dying because of bureaucratic incompetence. For example: {{cite book|title=The Third Lie: Why Government Programs Don't Work—and a Blueprint for Change|last=Gelles|first=Richard|date=2016|isbn=1611320526|publisher=Routledge}}. I agree that the article currently is, at best, start class, and I hope to have some time this weekend to expand and improve it, but a new article being imperfect is not grounds for deletion Deletion of Death of Amanda Froistad WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1318 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manipur State Constitution Act 1947 User:ChunnuBhai 10:41, 25 November 2020 (UTC) delete I dont see this article being more than few lines ever. Earlier the article was a copy paste of website e-pao.net and was trimmed down to avoid . The author has a history of copy pasting material from the same website into different articles. possible with Independent Manipur movement and SPA for the same Deletion of Manipur State Constitution Act 1947 WP:COPYVIO||WP:COI Wikipedia:Copyright violations 16 +1319 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hard Luck Hank User:Tokyogirl79 08:20, 7 June 2016 (UTC) delete I can't find anything to suggest that Campbell is notable either. Sometimes authors can achieve independent notability even if their body of work fails NBOOK, but this isn't one of those cases. It looks like the only coverage he's received in RS has been the SF Signal interview. Everything else has been primary or in |self-published sources like blogs and the like, not in any place that Wikipedia would consider reliable Deletion of Hard Luck Hank WP:SPS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1320 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medvertex User:HighKing 18:22, 16 June 2018 (UTC) delete Fails GNG and . I rolled back the blanking of the article Deletion of Medvertex WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1321 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thon (river) User:Carlossuarez46 05:15, 21 June 2013 (UTC) keep per ; nominator failed Deletion of Thon (river) WP:GEOLAND||WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1322 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Folk Guy's Always with You User:Raysonho NONE keep First of all, we need to understand that this is an article translated from Chinese. So google searching the English name does not reflect the actual popularity of this song. Second, and the most important point is, this is not purely an article about the song, but also the impact of this song to the Hong Kong Culture. It was covered by local media in HK. So I don't believe we should use the guidelines from Deletion of Folk Guy's Always with You WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1323 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Square root of 5 User:JPG 03:39, 12 August 2007 (UTC) keep inherently notable. Part of me wants to claim bad faith nomination as user clearly has a scientific background, but I'm going to and chalk it up to being outside his field Deletion of Square root of 5 WP:AGF Wikipedia:Assume good faith 53 +1324 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Brown (motorist) User:Richard 02:36, 5 July 2016 (UTC) keep per Deletion of Joshua Brown (motorist) WP:1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1325 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tasha Williamson User:4meter4 21:53, 29 September 2019 (UTC) keep """Passes for her work as an activist but not as a politician. Her Peace Prize win was significant enough that she was the main subject of several articles acknowledging her work as an activist/ founder of the active non-profit San Diego Compassion Project, including the national news article """"TCWF Honors Unsung Heroes With 21st Annual California Peace Prize"""", ''PR Newswire'', 10 September 2013 (the text of which mainly is about Tasha Williamson and her work as an activist) . That in conjunction with all of the news articles already cited in the article are enough to just barely pass . On a side note, it would be helpful to create a notability guideline specifically for activists""" Deletion of Tasha Williamson WP:GNG||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1326 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dragonlance artifacts User:FreeRangeFrog 21:35, 12 January 2013 (UTC) delete As listcruft, collection of dubious value, no standalone notability for anything there, no encyclopedic need for a 'breakout' article of that magnitude and especially #PLOT. I'm sure there's a Wikia somewhere that would be a better host for this Deletion of List of Dragonlance artifacts WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1327 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jen Taylor Friedman User:Jon513 11:38, 23 July 2007 (UTC) delete I agree with IZAK. I would also add that as Friedman only coverage is because she is a novelty (female torah scribe) it is not enough (per ) to have an article about her. The subject can be better dealt with in Sofer#Women and Sofrut Deletion of Jen Taylor Friedman WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +1328 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DucKon User:Jbhunley 22:11, 22 October 2015 (UTC) delete Non-notable Con. Fails Deletion of DucKon WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1329 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Vanity Label User:78 23:32, 3 February 2018 (UTC) delete unless it can be the label actually issued material by The Format. If so, then '''Merge''' and redirect. In any case this has no notability outside the band that made the label for their own purposes Deletion of The Vanity Label WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1330 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dexter's Laboratory: The Musical Time Machine User:SBKSPP 03:31, 15 May 2021 (UTC) merge to Dexter's Laboratory#Music releases Fails per nom Deletion of Dexter's Laboratory: The Musical Time Machine WP:NALBUM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1331 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woohoo (song) user:BGTopDon 02:06, 2 June 2010 (UTC) keep WP:NSONG and Deletion of Woohoo (song) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1332 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alix Lynx User:Guilherme 01:14, 3 April 2018 (UTC) delete Fail in ? Yes. Fail in ? Perhaps. But all sources cite the fact about she leaves her corporate Job to Be a Porn Star. This is Deletion of Alix Lynx WP:PORNBIO||WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1333 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swargakunnile Kuriyakose user:IVORK 01:22, 26 March 2018 (UTC) delete Had tagged for CSD and PROD for failing to meet , I believe the article creator {{u|Jinuthomson}} has been removing the XfD/AfD notices Deletion of Swargakunnile Kuriyakose WP:NMOVIE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1334 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millie Binks User:Edison 23:11, 4 January 2009 (UTC) delete Seems to fail |notability and Deletion of Millie Binks WP:N||WP:ENTERTAINER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1335 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Collegiate Statesmen Foundation User:HitroMilanese 21:26, 6 September 2015 (UTC) delete Fails on . Not enough coverage in reliable sources, hence failing Deletion of The Collegiate Statesmen Foundation WP:NONPROFIT||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1336 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs in English labeled the worst ever (3rd nomination) User:Resolute 16:20, 2 July 2006 (UTC) comment """The problem here is that the author has simply picked and chosen whatever entries he dislikes from these lists and included them in this article. That is both |OR and |POV. The only possible way this article can avoid violating both these policies is if the article was rewritten to show the top five or top ten of various """"worst song lists"""" from reputable sources, ie VH1, BBC, Rolling Stone, etc. However, in that case, it is merely listcruft, and violates as it would be an indiscriminate collection of information""" Deletion of List of songs in English labeled the worst ever (3rd nomination) WP:NOR||WP:NPOV||WP:NOT Wikipedia:No original research 12 +1337 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hirushi Jayasena User:John 16:22, 9 November 2020 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Hirushi Jayasena WP:SINGER||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1338 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georges Khabbaz User:Elie 17:19, 4 February 2011 (UTC) keep Subject meets criteria Deletion of Georges Khabbaz WP:ARTIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1339 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trivaeo User:JohnCD 16:17, 11 February 2009 (UTC) delete per #Articles on neologisms and - a look at http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=Trivaeo&btnG=Google+Search&meta= Google confirms that this termis only in use in connection with this company and its products Deletion of Trivaeo WP:NEO||WP:ADVERT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +1340 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Warady Group User:Ged 11:33, 25 February 2009 (UTC) delete as per . He might be notable, his company isn't Deletion of Joel Warady Group WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Spam 26 +1341 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wakefield High School (Raleigh, North Carolina) User:TerriersFan 19:26, 10 October 2008 (UTC) keep high school for which sources are available to meet Deletion of Wakefield High School (Raleigh, North Carolina) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1342 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cibao Airport Flight Schedule (2nd nomination) User:Cremepuff222 00:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC) delete Already deleted before. Recreation of material violating . it already Deletion of Cibao Airport Flight Schedule (2nd nomination) WP:NOT||WP:SNOW Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1343 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Power (actor) User:MichaelQSchmidt 19:07, 9 May 2009 (UTC) comment """The basice citeria for begins """"''A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject. If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be needed to prove notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability. Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject.''"""". Simple and difficuly to misunderstand. The next section """"additional criteria"""" list some additional standards, of which is one, but specifically states among its cautionary caveats: """"''Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included''"""" and """"''Should a person fail to meet these additional criteria, '''they may still be notable''' under Wikipedia:Notability.''"""" Continuing on past these preliminary instructions in order to then find some way to exclude a notable person is not what guideine expects or desires. This individual's notability has been asserted, properly established, and properly sourced through and . Thank you""" Deletion of Sean Power (actor) WP:PEOPLE||WP:N||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1344 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Allison (2nd nomination) User:Bearian 20:31, 7 April 2021 (UTC) delete First, off the promotional tone screams . I see a few articles ''by'' her, but ''absolutely nothing'' in | reliable sources ''about'' her. She has 49,000 followers on Twitter, a testament to her follow-back and self-promotion strategies. This is a total fail of . I can't believe this was kept in 2009 Deletion of Julia Allison (2nd nomination) WP:TNT||WP:RS||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +1345 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Private Jet Group User:Ahunt 18:10, 1 October 2010 (UTC) delete Clearly a CorpSpam article, the refs cited are just directory listings and do not establish notability to the degree required by Deletion of Private Jet Group WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1346 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yannai Gonczarowski [[User talk:Becky Sayles|''' B E C K Y S A Y L E S ''']] 01:19, 11 January 2015 (UTC) delete Insufficient references to support Deletion of Yannai Gonczarowski WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1347 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony (editor) User:Oroso 23:27, 23 August 2008 (UTC) delete WP:CSD A7. The article does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. If it doesn't meet that, regular delete for failing to prove it meets Deletion of Anthony (editor) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1348 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jews and Communism User:IZAK 17:44, 5 March 2014 (UTC) merge """to History of communism because as this title stands now it is basically a crude attempt to smear the Jews and not much else. There is a subtle very fine line between presenting facts objectively in NPOV fashion versus using facts in a tendentious manner to paint an obviously derogatory picture of an ''ethnic'' group that has had many characteristics attached to it by its enemies, thus violating in the process with unwanted tones of a favorite slander thrown at """"Jews"""" when, note, the truth about Jews (look up the term) is that they are an ''ethnicity'' but overlooks the fact that when connected to Judaism it ''opposes'' secular atheist ideologies which is what Communism is. Thus those Jews who were part of it were more accurately RENEGADE Jews, which this title does nothing to make clear. No normal person would post about Germans and Nazism since objectively no fair person would want to slander the German people as a whole to associate ''all'' of them with the implication of being Nazis, unlike this article which implicates all Jews willy-nilly, by not having any qualifiers of any kind at any point! Likewise no normal person would write up an article of Italians and Fascism or Italians and the Mafia because that would obviously DEFAME ''all'' Italians by association implying that Italians have a predilection for Fascism or the Mafia. While many Jews were part of Communism's early history and founding, it should be part of the history of communism and not mis-represented as being a """"by-product"""" of Jews (always worrisome when articles like this pop up), no more or less than no normal person would write a blanket article implying that Germans are somehow or other the only prime motivators for the rise of Nazism, or implicating Italians as having some kind of monopoly over the causes promoting the rise of Fascism or the birth of the Mafia. Take heed, this is a slippery slope""" Deletion of Jews and Communism WP:NOTSOAPBOX Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1349 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Tyler (musician) User:AngelOfSadness 17:38, 31 January 2008 (UTC) delete fails , no references that assert notability. The only assertion of significance if being a part of the band Walking Corpse whose article also may not meet the critera of Deletion of Jason Tyler (musician) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1350 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people with coronavirus disease 2019 User:DigitalPanda 08:25, 16 March 2020 (UTC) keep the delete !votes are misunderstanding or misrepresenting the policies they keep quoting. I call on getting a consensus Deletion of List of people with coronavirus disease 2019 WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +1351 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P.K.(2014 film) User:Tokyogirl79 19:46, 22 January 2013 (UTC) keep I agree with Schmidt- this looks to be one of those rare circumstances that a film meets without being a major Hollywood film and without starting principal filming. If all else fails, this should be incubated so that if/when filming does start by the end of the month, it can be re-added Deletion of P.K.(2014 film) WP:NFF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1352 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bus routes in Greater Manchester User:Imzadi1979 00:50, 25 March 2013 (UTC) delete fails and . Lists like these should be transwikied to Wikivoyage rather than left on Wikipedia Deletion of List of bus routes in Greater Manchester WP:GNG||WP:NOTTRAVEL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1353 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kudai's third studio album User:PC78 17:51, 7 February 2008 (UTC) delete per . The single reference is very weak, and this information is already covered in the band's article Deletion of Kudai's third studio album WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1354 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pwn (2nd nomination) User:MLauba 08:44, 20 May 2009 (UTC) merge No |reliable sources in sufficient non-trivial quantity to attest to anything more than the fact that it exists, doesn't warrant a standalone article. Leet already covers the neologism, add a transwiki link to Wiktionary and we're done Deletion of Pwn (2nd nomination) WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1355 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Neider User:Trackinfo 02:53, 10 October 2014 (UTC) keep """Yeah it was poorly written, bad links, no sources. It certainly needs some clean up, some of which I added. Had a been done, it is clear this guy is the leader of a notable recording act that has released three albums (though it was a red link because the original editor doesn't know what he's doing). The guy found old tapes that were important enough Dave Grohl got involved remixing and releasing it. The group is going on an """"international"""" tour in 2014, also documented in blacklisted sources that also have interviews with this guy, but confirmed by the Village Voice. I also pointed to another interview with the guy that is not blacklisted. As an individual, he has played in multiple groups, sourced. He achieves several points on for notability as an individual""" Deletion of Mike Neider WP:BEFORE||WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +1356 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pursed lip breathing User:Edison 15:55, 7 September 2011 (UTC) keep """http://www.normalbreathing.com/d/pursed-lip-breathing.php This reference, cited above, includes a listing of many articles published in major medical journals which are about this therapeutic breathing technique, so it satisfies . http://books.google.com/books?id=Km5x3lEVOCUC&pg=PA260&dq=%22pursed+lip+breathing%22&hl=en&ei=N5RnTsmsIMXz0gHw0Z3LCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDwQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22pursed%20lip%20breathing%22&f=false This book actually discusses """"pursed lip breathing"""" as an example of finding reliable sources in medical journals, and says the author found such sources. Here are others of the Google Books hits, which have with significant coverage: http://books.google.com/books?id=rTexGiX5bqoC&pg=PA277&dq=%22pursed+lip+breathing%22&hl=en&ei=lpVnTqCCDNS_gQfb4JS3DA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDYQ6AEwADgU#v=onepage&q=%22pursed%20lip%20breathing%22&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=oMzhfkVZBDYC&pg=PA37&dq=%22pursed+lip+breathing%22&hl=en&ei=zpVnTtuGIcLngQeBouXtDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CFcQ6AEwBjge#v=onepage&q=%22pursed%20lip%20breathing%22&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=VE8UJZrp6NIC&pg=PA143&dq=%22pursed+lip+breathing%22&hl=en&ei=JZVnToneIojEgAfyzInRDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDgQ6AEwADgK#v=onepage&q=%22pursed%20lip%20breathing%22&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=HY9PiQL3kQMC&pg=PA504&dq=%22pursed+lip+breathing%22&hl=en&ei=JZVnToneIojEgAfyzInRDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CEoQ6AEwAzgK#v=onepage&q=%22pursed%20lip%20breathing%22&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=dQ2zJxdXpWkC&pg=PA170&dq=%22pursed+lip+breathing%22&hl=en&ei=JZVnToneIojEgAfyzInRDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CF0Q6AEwBjgK#v=onepage&q=%22pursed%20lip%20breathing%22&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=M4HwH5IxfToC&pg=PA464&dq=%22pursed+lip+breathing%22&hl=en&ei=N5RnTsmsIMXz0gHw0Z3LCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CEEQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=%22pursed%20lip%20breathing%22&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=p-hrqLpelEgC&pg=PA206&dq=%22pursed+lip+breathing%22&hl=en&ei=N5RnTsmsIMXz0gHw0Z3LCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CEYQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=%22pursed%20lip%20breathing%22&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=A--epDTB2hMC&pg=PA6&dq=%22pursed+lip+breathing%22&hl=en&ei=N5RnTsmsIMXz0gHw0Z3LCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CE0Q6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=%22pursed%20lip%20breathing%22&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=gRwhZN4B4i4C&pg=PA2486&dq=%22pursed+lip+breathing%22&hl=en&ei=N5RnTsmsIMXz0gHw0Z3LCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CFMQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=%22pursed%20lip%20breathing%22&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=NWjb332kyMUC&pg=PA203&dq=%22pursed+lip+breathing%22&hl=en&ei=N5RnTsmsIMXz0gHw0Z3LCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=9&ved=0CGQQ6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=%22pursed%20lip%20breathing%22&f=false. Google Scholar has 1300 hits: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=%22pursed+lip+breathing%22&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdtf=&as_sdts=14&hl=en""" Deletion of Pursed lip breathing WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1357 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bosniak Canadian User:Laughing 06:02, 11 February 2007 (UTC) delete per nom, and clearly ''' Deletion of Bosniak Canadian WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +1358 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annie Le User:Dennisthe2 23:10, 14 September 2009 (UTC) keep on this one. There are the concerns, and it's geared to basically be an obituary, more or less, but I want to see this one develop. Something about |instinct on this one Deletion of Annie Le WP:BIO1E||WP:IAR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1359 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Fox Glacier FU-24 crash User:HumanBodyPiloter5 23:03, 14 August 2021 (UTC) keep Seems to fairly easily meet Deletion of 2010 Fox Glacier FU-24 crash WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1360 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aisha Chaudhary User:Atlantic306 20:07, 5 July 2020 (UTC) keep as meets as explained above and as confirmed in multiple reliable sources already in the article such as Indian Express, India Today and others so deletion is unnecessary in my view Deletion of Aisha Chaudhary WP:NAUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1361 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fundamental Surprise User:Tevildo 12:20, 26 June 2006 (UTC) delete per nom. Fails . G1 is tempting, but no Deletion of Fundamental Surprise WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +1362 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 UCLA throat slashing User:Mandsford 03:12, 12 March 2011 (UTC) delete Not a historical , didn't go beyond . Definitely no merge to the UCLA article Deletion of 2009 UCLA throat slashing WP:EVENT||WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1363 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Worlds Resorts User:Cunard 05:41, 22 October 2009 (UTC) delete per the lack of |reliable sources. The article is unreferenced and promotional. The content could be useful for a merge if there were sources, but I have been unable to find any. Having searched through Google News Archive and Google, I was not able to find reliable sources.Only useful, marginally-notable content that can be sourced should be merged. However, since there are no sources, merging this content to LGBT tourism would not improve that article but detract from its quality Deletion of All Worlds Resorts WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1364 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of selfie-related injuries and deaths User:Savonneux 04:07, 19 August 2015 (UTC) keep or merge. It looks as though some people need to read again ''Questionable sources are those with a poor reputation for checking the facts, or with no editorial oversight.''. Searching this brings up a huge article in the Christian Science Monitor (has nothing to do with Christian or Science before the uninformed lose their shit) http://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2015/0726/Enough-with-the-bison-selfies-at-Yellowstone-says-National-Park-Service, covering most of the incidents listed. Coverage on a government website of one incident http://www.nps.gov/yell/learn/news/15047.htm. NBC news one incident http://www.9news.com/story/news/weird/2014/08/10/couple-falls-to-their-deaths-while-taking-selfie/13873801. Among others. Not to mention general coverage of the topic in the CS Monitor http://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2015/0707/How-to-prevent-death-by-selfie-a-guide-from-Russian-government, the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs https://mvd.ru/safety_selfie. And so on and so on Deletion of List of selfie-related injuries and deaths WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1365 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hattie B's Hot Chicken User:Otr500 10:45, 9 December 2017 (UTC) delete """I saw the listing here and clicked on the article before reading these comments. I was surely going to !vote """"keep"""" because it is referenced with """"Time"""", """"Sports Illustrated"""", """"USA Today"""", """"Washington Post"""", ''and'' """"National Geographic"""" among others, so that is a wrap right? I came back here, read the """"keep"""" !vote comment of """"Northamerica1000"""", with all the reasoning why the article should remain, and it was still a wrap. '''Then''', I read the comments of SwisterTwister, and reread the article. '''OMG! It is the best advertising article Wikipedia could present'''. Just read (or reread) the fantastic |advertising """"Reception"""" section. I want some of that chicken. Take a look at the guideline concerning Wikipedia:Spam|spam, the lack of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutrality, and the rationale (such as great national advertising) for any """"keep"""" !votes are buried beneath several WP:policies and guidelines|policies and guidelines that mandate deletion. This article is so good I still think I would like to try the chicken, but that is probably a red flag also""" Deletion of Hattie B's Hot Chicken WP:NOTADVERTISING Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1366 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Food Network Humor User:RL0919 18:50, 19 December 2009 (UTC) delete No sign of any coverage by reliable sources, pretty much just obvious Deletion of Food Network Humor WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Spam 26 +1367 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro Wrestling Alliance Australia User:Music1201 20:34, 15 May 2016 (UTC) merge to Pro Wrestling Women's Alliance. This article was originally created as a redirect to Pro Wrestling Women's Alliance and was later created as an article, although, an independent article for this topic should not be included in an encyclopedia because it fails the |general notability guideline. &mdash Deletion of Pro Wrestling Alliance Australia WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1368 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serene Branson User:Kevin 22:05, 15 February 2011 (UTC) delete I pretty much agree with Tarc. If it wasn't for the recent event she would not be notable. The earlier coverage is neither substantial nor widespread, being typical local coverage of TV reporters. This would not have passed before, which makes this recent incident fit squarely into Deletion of Serene Branson WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1369 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Toms User:Bearian 21:05, 25 November 2013 (UTC) delete There is an allegation of notability under - that he's toured extensively in the United States. However, all the https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Ashley+Toms%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1 news articles indicate local stardom in the Sarasota area only Deletion of Ashley Toms WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1370 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liverpool Pirate Radio User:Edison 18:11, 8 September 2009 (UTC) delete A magistrate's court record is a primary source and certainly in no way satisfies |notability requirements of substantial coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. We look for coverage in reliable and independent secondary sources. There is a newspaper article, but it shows nothing more significant than a hobby operation. The newspaper article just says he broadcast for 3 weeks before he was busted and fined Deletion of Liverpool Pirate Radio WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1371 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacksonville Ninja User:RFerreira 02:18, 19 February 2010 (UTC) delete as this fails and the more general guidelines Deletion of Jacksonville Ninja WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1372 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fygnificm User:RC 15:32, 15 April 2008 (UTC) delete per |G1 and possibly G3 Deletion of Fygnificm WP:SPEEDY Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +1373 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cold Wars (gaming) User:SportingFlyer 05:29, 13 September 2018 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Cold Wars (gaming) WP:NEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1374 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arizona Wildcats football series records User:Ejgreen77 06:17, 8 January 2016 (UTC) delete """In addition to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas Longhorns football series records, these types of lists have discussed at some length Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#UB Bulls Football Records|here in Nov. 2015 and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football/Archive 16#Category:College football all-time series records|here in Sept. 2015. The consensus, which I support, is that we should not have such """"series results"""" lists. The real issues here are whether the lists satisfy and whether, even if the subject is notable, we ought to exercise editorial judgment under to opt against a stand-alone list/article. In this case, I favor our exercise of editorial judgment to avoid such articles for two reasons. First, I have concerns about our ability to maintain such sprawling lists, as the data at issue is massive (particularly if there are such lists for dozens and dozens of college football programs) and changes with great frequency. Second, the same data sets are published off Wikipedia by organizations (e.g., http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/schools/texas/head-to-head.html here) that are better equipped to perform regular updates of the data. As for , it remains my view that a number of editors have incorrectly interpreted NOTSTATS and that deletionists will seek to exploit that misinterpretation. The purpose of NOTSTATS is to require context for stats and to avoid pure data dumps. If there is a statistical list that is notable and not indiscriminate, NOTSTATS suggests that any such listing should have contextual narrative text and citations. The introductory sentence of emphasizes precisely this: """"To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources."""" As""" Deletion of Arizona Wildcats football series records WP:LISTN||WP:PAGEDECIDE||WP:NOTSTATS||WP:NOTSTATS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1375 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rallye rim User:RichardOSmith 20:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC) comment """I don't think the proposer has put forward a valid reason for deletion so I cannot support the nomination. Google clearly shows the term ''Rallye Rim'' in use to at least indicate that the term is indeed an alternative for """"Rally wheel"""", and if establishing this more formally cannot be achieved then the article could still be renamed """"Rally wheel"""", for which there is much information. WP:PRODUCT clearly doesn't apply because this is not a particular manufacturers product. However, it does seem this article is no more than a |dictionary entry and as it has not become more that than in the 18 months it has existed, it probably isn't going to""" Deletion of Rallye rim WP:DICTDEF Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +1376 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coolplay User:Snigbrook 18:34, 15 November 2009 (UTC) delete fails . Some sources have been added, but there is no evidence of non-trivial coverage Deletion of Coolplay WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1377 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Plummer User:Amisom 14:35, 8 May 2017 (UTC) delete not seeing any |significant coverage in reliable source Deletion of Mike Plummer WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1378 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurel Schwulst User:MrOllie 22:05, 9 September 2020 (UTC) delete Lots of citations, but I don't see any that any of them are independent with |significant coverage Deletion of Laurel Schwulst WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1379 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yellow cab User:Dhartung 09:11, 16 May 2007 (UTC) keep Yellow cab (stereotype). Excellent by CaliforniaAliBaba aka cab. http://www.mssv.net/wiki.cgi?Eponysterical Eponysterical Deletion of Yellow cab WP:HEY Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard 85 +1380 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Siciliano User:Cavarrone 06:54, 15 July 2013 (UTC) keep """Composer of the Year"""" award at the 67th Venice Film Festival and 2006 Nastro d'Argento award for Best Score are quite enough to pass 's first requirement. The coverage that was listed above is also fine""" Deletion of Louis Siciliano WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1381 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noynoying User:RightCowLeftCoast 20:51, 24 March 2012 (UTC) merge to Benigno Aquino III. Although the subject has received some media coverage perhaps it is for the subject to pass . In the mean time the article can be summarized, created into a section regarding the present President of the Philippines|President of the Fifth Republic of the Philippines; if it later gets too large and the article reaches 100K per it can be |spun out, or if it does pass & later the redirect can be recreated as an article again Deletion of Noynoying WP:TOOSOON||WP:EFFECT||WP:TOOLONG||WP:SPINOUT||WP:GNG||WP:EVENT||WP:EFFECT Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +1382 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In der Falle User:Roscelese 15:19, 25 April 2011 (UTC) keep Passes criterion #5 of as the author has won a Nobel in literature Deletion of In der Falle WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1383 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ifan Ifeanyi Michael User:Kudpung 06:48, 29 December 2019 (UTC) delete Fails . Probably a vanity page Deletion of Ifan Ifeanyi Michael WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1384 """Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/""""A"""" Is for Alibi""" User:Dravecky 08:28, 26 December 2010 (UTC) comment While several of the articles are currently referenced stubs, that's a reason to expand the articles, not to delete them. They ''all'' meet the clear guidelines. Please note that the nominator has jumped right to AfD without tagging any of the articles or working to improve them ( """Deletion of """"A"""" Is for Alibi""" WP:NBOOK||WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1385 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aris Poulianos User:Adambiswanger1 17:37, 6 October 2006 (UTC) comment I can easily see why one would want for this to be deleted, but also I am remidned that Greek Anthropology is not likely to summon up many Google hits or many sources outside of a specialized library. This does not mean he is not notable, though. As Fut. Perf noted, it would be difficult to verify much of this information, but I'm not sure if that is reason enough for deletion. It seems to be more of our own insufficiency rather than his. The |professor test comes to mind here. This guy is an academian, and if he stood in a lecture hall and spoke for 1 hour per week, he would otherwise prove to be more notable than the average professor Deletion of Aris Poulianos WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1386 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michigan digitization project User:Dhartung 03:37, 20 August 2007 (UTC) delete I #DIR|don't believe we are a directory of all digitization projects undertaken by library and records agencies, as that would be quite extensive Deletion of Michigan digitization project WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1387 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Activate (organisation) User:Bonadea 09:44, 6 April 2018 (UTC) keep even a cursory look at the sources shows that there is significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources, so the group easily meets |the relevant notability guideline Deletion of Activate (organisation) WP:ORGCRIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1388 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rugby Challenge NONE 21:17, 18 November 2010 (UTC) comment Article still lacks |independent, reliable sources needed to establish notability. If they are added, consider my delete recommendation withdrawn. Chopper Dave, please |assume good faith in your edit summaries. Thank you Deletion of Rugby Challenge WP:RS||WP:AGF Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1389 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eamon McDonnell User:Nappa90 08:02, 31 May 2007 (UTC) delete As . If you want to keep the content, then move it into something like Deletion of Eamon McDonnell WP:HOAX Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes 40 +1390 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Cohen User:MER 07:07, 18 December 2006 (UTC) delete unreferenced |autobiography of a |non-notable person Deletion of Ryan Cohen WP:AUTO||WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Autobiography 75 +1391 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duke Terrell User:Ben 17:29, 2 May 2011 (UTC) delete Fails per , no substantial secondary sources, the rest of the article is promotion by name dropping. The article sources his former band and his business management but not the musician. I'm accusing the author of and |gaming the system: Talk:Duke Terrell Deletion of Duke Terrell WP:MUSICBIO||WP:RELIABLE||WP:COI||WP:GAME Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1392 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caffers User:Lee 20:41, 10 May 2006 (UTC) delete """From the line """"I believe i now meet the criteria!"""" as well as the """"dead, famous, etc, etc"""" remark, it appears the author needed to prove they are notable for some reason or another to someone who said they'd accept """"having an article on Wikipedia"""" as acceptable proof of notability. Still violates , among others""" Deletion of Caffers WP:VANITY Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +1393 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sciona Browne User:Tavix 19:58, 1 November 2008 (UTC) delete as non-notable Survivor contestant. Aside from the winners and two-time players, it is generally been a consensus to delete articles of survivor contestants that are not notable for anything else outside the show because of Deletion of Sciona Browne WP:1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1394 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chant Noël: Chants For The Holiday Season User:CooperDB 12:46, 16 August 2013 (UTC) keep This album peaked at http://www.allmusic.com/album/chant-noel-mw0000635665/awards 3rd position on the Billboard Top Classical Album chart in 1994. This may be sufficient to meet and . Certainly, if not, then the article should be merged with Chant (Benedictine Monks of Santo Domingo de Silos album) which is clearly notable Deletion of Chant Noël: Chants For The Holiday Season WP:NSONG||WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1395 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute for International Research NONE NONE delete This easily qualifies as entirely #G11|unambiguous advertising Deletion of Institute for International Research WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +1396 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheese (cheesy music) User:Andrew 01:11, 20 April 2007 (UTC) delete we don't need an article for the use of an adjective that some people associate with some types of music. Therefore, I believe the content isn't suited for an encyclopedia, nor does it meet the spirit of . Plus there are OR/sourcing issues Deletion of Cheese (cheesy music) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1397 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Lukes User:Doctorfluffy 21:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC) delete per nom. Unlikely reliable, secondary sources exist to satisfy Deletion of Martin Lukes WP:FICT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1398 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZoomInfo (2nd nomination) User:K 03:00, 12 September 2018 (UTC) delete Does not meet ; the sourcing is routine and / or . Just a company going about its business; this is insufficient for encyclopedia notability Deletion of ZoomInfo (2nd nomination) WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:SPIP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1399 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elisabeth DeMarse User:Cerebellum 14:28, 4 December 2011 (UTC) keep She seems to have had enough reliable, third-party coverage to pass . Most of the results of https://www.google.com/#q=%22Elisabeth+DeMarse%22&hl=en&safe=off&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&prmd=imvnso&ei=oIHbTs6JC-L10gGm0uSEDg&start=0&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=5a8580cc4be5acb6&biw=1366&bih=631 this google news search are paywalled, but here are few that are not: http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/news/2011/01/10/insweb-adds-board-member.html, a brief article about her, http://www.nytimes.com/2000/05/03/business/executive-changes-064491.html, which contains a paragraph about her, and http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20060410005246/en/Austin-Ventures-Announces-Partnership-Elisabeth-DeMarse-Pursue, a fairly extensive profile of her. She was president and CEO of Bankrate and CreditCard.com, and also held senior positions at Bloomberg L.P., Citibank, and Hoover's, has been on the board of directors of several enterprises, and seems to have started her own company (DeMarseco) also, which is partnered with Austin Ventures Deletion of Elisabeth DeMarse WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1400 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edith Grove User:Eastmain 07:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC) keep """New Mexico media coverage passes the """"reliable sources"""" test, and hence the band passes . There is an allmusic.com listing at http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&searchlink=EDITH|GROVE&sql=11:wxfwxqqgldde~T2 The article doesn't menbtion which label the albums are on, though, suggesting that they may be self-released""" Deletion of Edith Grove WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1401 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Spielberg User:Colapeninsula 15:42, 29 November 2013 (UTC) keep """as notable. A lot of the sources are routine local press coverage (although there's certainly a grey area between """"X is playing Y"""" which doesn't count and publications using an event as a peg for a larger article which does count), but there is a sizeable article from the New York Timeshttp://www.nytimes.com/2000/06/04/nyregion/music-an-infant-s-struggle-a-mother-s-gift-of-life.html and she's also been reviewed in the Washington Posthttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPcap/2000-06/16/102r-061600-idx.html as well as multiple reviews on AllMusic, and her self-published book was reviewed in Kirkushttps://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/robin-spielberg/naked-on-the-bench/. Plus there's the 1995 Billboard article, which she's not the primary subject of, but it still provides significant coverage, so that counts too for . And local press coverage, which counts for less, but cumulatively it all adds up to meeting . And the article does need editing""" Deletion of Robin Spielberg WP:GNG||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1402 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public bathroom User:Colonel 11:23, 2 July 2012 (UTC) merge to public bathing which is the most direct context for this. Usage of bathroom to mean a water closet is a |euphemism and so is best avoided Deletion of Public bathroom WP:EUPHEMISM Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +1403 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naomi Hunter User:Lefcentreright 17:38, 8 September 2020 (UTC) delete Doesn't meet . Hunter is the leader of a small provincial political party Deletion of Naomi Hunter WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1404 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klarisse de Guzman (2nd nomination) User:onel5969 19:04, 14 March 2021 (UTC) delete not nearly enough to pass , nothing significant since last AfD Deletion of Klarisse de Guzman (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1405 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monster Trux Extreme: Offroad Edition (2nd nomination) User:Videogameplayer99 19:39, 13 December 2019 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Monster Trux Extreme: Offroad Edition (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1406 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chickenshit Conformist User:Uzma 10:12, 28 September 2012 (UTC) merge """There's a mention in http://search.wn.com/?template=cheetah-search-adv/index.txt&action=search&results_type=news&search_string=nazi%20punks%20fuck%20off!&language_id=1&sort_type=-pub-datetime&corpus=current&search_type=expression Do politics and rock remain a viable mix? Montreal Gazette October 6, 2001 (""""Rock'n'roll will always have an enemy, whether for the DKs or Elvis. That enemy is complacency, and if a song called Chickenshit Conformist counters the kind of thinking that might seek to rehabilitate the """"Reagan Revolution,"""" all the better.""""). Another mention in http://www.miaminewtimes.com/2002-02-07/music/better-dead/ Miami New Times February 7, 2002"""" """"The final studio effort, 1986's Bedtime for Democracy, pushed for musical innovation with the disturbing """"Chickenshit Conformist"""" and """"DMSO."""" """". Unlikely to meet """ Deletion of Chickenshit Conformist WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1407 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prettyman, Missouri User:Bearian 18:53, 29 January 2021 (UTC) delete """per - according to reference # 2, it is """"A switch on the Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railroad""" Deletion of Prettyman, Missouri WP:MILL Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill 32 +1408 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Taylor (entrepreneur) User:The 16:11, 20 March 2018 (UTC) keep as subject seems to (barely) meet . We probably need criteria specifically for business people and entrepreneurs Deletion of Jeff Taylor (entrepreneur) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1409 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aero Charter User:Hydronium 04:00, 9 March 2016 (UTC) delete """There's a number of GHits under """"Аеро Чартер"""" or """"Аеро-Чартер"""", though they appear mundane and mostly of questionable reliability. The Ukranian Wikipedia https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D1%96%D0%BA%D1%96%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D1%96%D1%8F:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%96_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%82%D1%96-%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%85%D1%96%D0%B27#.D0.90.D0.B5.D1.80.D0.BE-.D0.A7.D0.B0.D1.80.D1.82.D0.B5.D1.80_5.E2.80.943 voted to delete its article. ikiProject Aviation/Notability points at otability %28Transportation%29#Airlines, and that just lists |discussion in multiple, reliable sources. Even if common practice happens to be to retain airlines with scheduled flights, I'm not convinced that it's warranted here with cargo rather than passenger flights, and the contents of the article appears at risk of being and becoming inaccurate given the lack of RS and that it appears to be a snapshot of a particular time. Did the airline always operate with the listed destinations and aircraft? Does the airline still exist, and if not List of defunct airlines of Ukraine|when did it cease operations""" Deletion of Aero Charter WP:W||WP:N||WP:GNG Help:Watchlist 57 +1410 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joachim Christian Shah Mridhani Pahlavan-Nassab User:Bearian 00:32, 19 April 2017 (UTC) merge as suggested, and per and Deletion of Joachim Christian Shah Mridhani Pahlavan-Nassab WP:CHEAP||WP:BOLD Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap 74 +1411 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia Ann Laster User:DiamondRemley39 12:00, 3 November 2020 (UTC) keep """as satisfies #1: """"Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself."""" The reviews are plentiful online and not limited to what is in the article at present""" Deletion of Georgia Ann Laster WP:SINGER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1412 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Barrett User:Hell 00:56, 14 July 2013 (UTC) delete This was a pure promotion plain and simple. It was originally deleted as such then immediately recreated. The account that made it is the PR person or is the subject themself. Fails Deletion of Kelly Barrett WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1413 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jocelyne Couture-Nowak (4th nomination) User:BRMo 22:27, 24 July 2007 (UTC) keep """This biography clearly meets Wikipedia's |notability guideline: """"A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."""" The article cites a number of reliable, national news sources. Notability is not a personal """"achievement""""; it is a recognition that enough information on the subject has been published in reliable secondary sources to support an encyclopedia article""" Deletion of Jocelyne Couture-Nowak (4th nomination) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1414 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shannon lark User:Biruitorul 04:03, 12 February 2009 (UTC) delete for lack of multiple reliable sources. Ikip: Fangoria and Fearnet, being |self-published, violate our policy on |reliable sources Deletion of Shannon lark WP:SELFPUB||WP:RS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1415 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nirvana Chaudhary User:Brianhe 17:35, 4 October 2015 (UTC) delete agree, obviously non-notable per . I was going to try to rescue any material that could be copied to Binod Chaudhary but couldn't really find anything to keep Deletion of Nirvana Chaudhary WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1416 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. S. Srijith User:Akhiljaxxn 14:49, 30 July 2020 (UTC) delete per nom, subject fails and Deletion of P. S. Srijith WP:SIGCOV||WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1417 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adana-Mersin metropolitan area User:onel5969 02:00, 31 December 2020 (UTC) delete nothing to indicate this article is about a place that meets Deletion of Adana-Mersin metropolitan area WP:GEOLAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1418 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of plasma (physics) articles User:Northamerica1000 12:35, 8 February 2012 (UTC) keep """Per , """"redundant systems of organizing information are considered to be complementary, not inappropriately duplicative."""" Categories and list articles can exist simultaneously, to further accommodate user browsing per various user preferences. Also, per this section of the editing guideline, ...""""Furthermore, arguing that a category duplicates a list (or vice versa) at a deletion discussion is not a valid reason for deletion and should be avoided""" Deletion of List of plasma (physics) articles WP:NOTDUP Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates 5 +1419 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orchards of the world User:Clarityfiend 20:08, 16 February 2019 (UTC) delete per nom. Fails Deletion of Orchards of the world WP:NEOLOGISM Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +1420 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Games Finder User:Aoziwe 04:27, 5 March 2020 (UTC) delete Having perused the requirements of , the site surely fails. I agree that there are no IRS; and none are likely to be found. I had hoped I could add some IRS in an attempt to save the page but like Deletion of Games Finder WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1421 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Haiti earthquake conspiracy theories [[User talk:70.29.210.242|talk]]) 08:03, 28 January 2010 (UTC) comment does it meet ? Special:Contributions/70.29.210.242|70.29.210.242 Deletion of 2010 Haiti earthquake conspiracy theories WP:FRINGE Wikipedia:Fringe theories 44 +1422 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodney Pocceschi NONE NONE comment Note that is a ''guideline'', not policy. From Deletion of Rodney Pocceschi WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1423 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of burn centers in the United States (2nd nomination) User:Bearian 17:02, 18 March 2014 (UTC) keep per doncram. Rather than being |run of the mill common, burn-center hospitals are rare, and mentioned commonly and prominently in the news media, so |significant coverage is readily available. Having a |list here would be helpful for our users to research and navigate, compared to a category Deletion of List of burn centers in the United States (2nd nomination) WP:MILL||WP:SIGCOV||WP:LIST Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill 32 +1424 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Racial Boundaries User:Mandsford 17:08, 25 November 2008 (UTC) delete """Though it may not be """"original research"""", it's certainly """"original synthesis"""", and it's unavoidably someone's point of view . The central thesis of what looks like someone's college essay is """"Racial boundaries are widely used in the United States to keep certain races from achieving their full potential through political policies, social policies and family wealth."""" The two sections are, in reality, two book reports, with """"Wealth as a Racial Boundary"""" being drawn from a book by Thomas Shapiro, and """"Mass Imprisonment as a Racial Boundary"""" coming from a book by Bruce Western. My suggestion is that the author should merge this to the article Thomas Shapiro and to consider creating an article about {Bruce Western""" Deletion of Racial Boundaries WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +1425 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kieran Preston User:GiantSnowman 09:16, 28 May 2016 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Kieran Preston WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1426 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Paffrath (2nd nomination) User:Cullen328 01:35, 24 May 2021 (UTC) keep based on the coverage in the New York Times, Curbed and the Nashville Post that Empire3131 pointed out earlier. He is marginally notable as a real estate investor and YouTuber. I am taking a look ''only'' at the coverage that pre-dates his candidacy because he obviously fails as an unelected candidate with routine campaign announcements and interviews in a race likely to have a massive field of candidates. The references are a shambles, and the article needs a lot of work, and the most important thing is that the article must not be permitted to become a campaign brochure. Many of the people commenting above have been canvassed and have negligible knowledge of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The closing administrator will have to discount those comments and give highest priority to the informed, policy based comments, but that's why administrators get paid far more than YouTube influencers, right? Just kidding Deletion of Kevin Paffrath (2nd nomination) WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1427 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021–22 Boreham Wood F.C. season User:Govvy 19:46, 21 June 2021 (UTC) delete For failing , {{u|Skyblueshaun}} Should know not create level 5 or lower season articles, unless under it's a special season Deletion of 2021–22 Boreham Wood F.C. season WP:NSEASONS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1428 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas McAnulty User:MichaelQSchmidt 22:08, 17 December 2009 (UTC) delete without prejudice toward recreation. If is not met, becomes the determinant. That he is written of in numerous reliable sources is to be considered toward his possible meeting of . However, since that coverage is '''for''' that one role, this seems to be 1E. Let him get another role and receive coverage for that as well, and he may then better meet Deletion of Nicholas McAnulty WP:ENT||WP:GNG||WP:BLP||WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1429 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenny Wüstenberg User:David 04:44, 24 May 2019 (UTC) delete I found and added to the article three reviews and two award shortlists for her book. If there were another book with a similar reception I'd switch to keep. But it's one book, not enough by itself for , and the other material doesn't appear to rise to the level of notability Deletion of Jenny Wüstenberg WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1430 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Postmodernism and Me User:Scientizzle 21:14, 18 May 2006 (UTC) delete non-notable. , clearly Deletion of Postmodernism and Me WP:NFT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +1431 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Friday Alabama mall shooting User:E 12:21, 25 November 2018 (UTC) keep per because, Today's headlines: Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2018/11/24/police-said-they-killed-mall-shooter-now-they-say-they-might-have-shot-wrong-man/?utm_term=.0afebaf619eb ‘They shot the wrong man!’: Police said they killed a mall shooter — then said they made a mistake ; New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/24/us/alabama-mall-shooting.html Black Man Killed by Officer in Alabama Mall Shooting Was Not the Gunman, Police Now Say. Article needs major overhaul Deletion of Black Friday Alabama mall shooting WP:RAPID Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1432 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myspace censorship User:Bushcarrot 02:07, 26 September 2007 (UTC) delete Original research, as well as #SOAPBOX Deletion of Myspace censorship WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1433 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/11277 Ballard User:RJHall 14:42, 22 July 2012 (UTC) merge to List of minor planets: 11001–12000#201 per . Regards Deletion of 11277 Ballard WP:NASTHELP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1434 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terrian (singer) User:Versace1608 14:05, 26 April 2020 (UTC) delete Apart from her low charting singles, I was not able to find critical reviews of her music. I believe it is for her to have a separate article at this time. I'm confident she will become notable once she continues releasing quality music. I am going to give her music a listen; hopefully it is great Deletion of Terrian (singer) WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +1435 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah D. Goode User:Cdjp1 23:11, 23 April 2020 (UTC) keep per . She's not a pop psychologist; she's a sociologist who's been recognized for her work in her field. There are multiple reviews of her books, other academics reference her work, and she's treated by the press as an expert in understanding pedophiles Deletion of Sarah D. Goode WP:HEY Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard 85 +1436 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tavi Gevinson User:Rankiri 22:36, 22 January 2010 (UTC) comment I also don't think that a valid reason for deletion was given. Wikipedia is |not censored and the article seems to pass all key requirements of . It's relatively well-sourced, doesn't contain any defamatory information, and whatever basic personal facts it contains, they have already been published by several major news sources Deletion of Tavi Gevinson WP:NOTCENSORED||WP:BLP Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1437 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobby dabble User:Favonian 21:16, 3 January 2010 (UTC) delete per nom. The claims in the article deserve a deletion per #G3 Deletion of Bobby dabble WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +1438 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Très.B User:Royboycrashfan 00:56, 4 April 2006 (UTC) delete per , , and . Homepage on MySpace makes this an obvious delete Deletion of Très.B WP:MUSIC||WP:VANITY||WP:VSCA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1439 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lizette Parker User:Seraphim 21:56, 16 December 2017 (UTC) keep per above comments. does not say that the coverage for local politicians needs to be international or national, just significant. is a criteria for , not . There will of course be very notable political figures who don't receive national coverage Deletion of Lizette Parker WP:NPOL||WP:AUD||WP:NORG||WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1440 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technochrist User:JamesBurns 08:47, 17 February 2009 (UTC) delete insufficient independent 3rd party coverage Deletion of Technochrist WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1441 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafael Vargas-Bernal User:Nsk92 17:04, 31 August 2008 (UTC) delete Clearly fails . No evidence of significant citability of his work. Very little in GoogleScholarhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Rafael%20Vargas-Bernal%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ps, GoogleBookshttp://books.google.com/books?tab=sp&sa=N&hl=en&q=%22Rafael+Vargas-Bernal%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N, nothing at all in WebofScience and nothing in MathSciNet. No significant academic awards or honors beyond the grad student level, according to the June 2008 CVhttp://octi.guanajuato.gob.mx/octigto/formularios/cicti/curricula/Curriculum%20Vitae%2017%20de%20Junio%20de%202008.pdf Deletion of Rafael Vargas-Bernal WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1442 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Dubeau User:Eastmain 16:53, 26 July 2018 (UTC) keep The analogy seems to make sense Deletion of Dan Dubeau WP:MILPERSON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1443 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of minor Star Wars droids User:Seraphimblade 18:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC) delete """and as to previous keep, note that the sources must be multiple, non-trivial, '''reliable''', and independent-this is not a """"pick any three"""", said sources must satisfy '''all four'''. Star Wars fandom coverage would not be reliable sourcing, and therefore fails. The two """"external links"""" cited don't remotely begin to satisfy the |reliability guidelines. However, I'm entirely willing to change my opinion if such sources can be found. Anyone !voting """"keep"""" should be prepared to cite sources, and be prepared to show or argue why those sources are independent (not affiliated with the Star Wars franchise), non-trivial (cover the subject in a sufficient depth for an encyclopedia article), and reliable (written by a source which is subject to editorial control or academic peer review.) I love Star Wars, but this just doesn't belong here""" Deletion of List of minor Star Wars droids WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1444 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avelyn Desbris User:Quasirandom 18:18, 26 January 2008 (UTC) comment I'm not finding much in the way of sources to support the notability of this character either. Contra nom, per not all in-universe material need be removed, and primary sources are acceptable for in-universe information. Per , the next thing to try is merge, but I'm not seeing an obvious merge target. Possibly selectively to a new Main Characters section in The DemonWars Saga. Will wait to !vote till I think some more Deletion of Avelyn Desbris WP:WAF||WP:FICT Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +1445 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenzie (songwriter) User:Metropolitan90 01:34, 26 April 2012 (UTC) keep It looks like the subject at least has a claim to be notable per since a few of her songs already have Wikipedia articles. I recommend that this article be re-structured to indicate the ''chart performance'' of the hit songs she wrote, according to the authoritative music charts as indicated at Wikipedia:Record charts. This would be a lot more relevant than the albums that the songs appeared on, which is currently included in the article Deletion of Kenzie (songwriter) WP:COMPOSER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1446 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Burchert User:Bearian 00:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC) delete per nom - improper no-freeuse images, |auto-hagiography, non-notable, improper sourcing for a , and spam Deletion of John Burchert WP:AUTO||WP:BLP Wikipedia:Autobiography 75 +1447 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InterQuest Group User:EuroCarGT 01:27, 3 October 2013 (UTC) delete Sources are not reliable and requires additional primary, secondary and teritary sources. Most of the sources are to there website. The article tone sounds like a company portfolio and many not meet Deletion of InterQuest Group WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1448 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Atlantic Sun Men's Basketball Tournament Finals broadcasters User:Cbl62 17:13, 5 November 2015 (UTC) delete per nom. (Merge per X96lee15 would be fine too.) I've never grasped the notability of these stand-alone lists of tournament and bowl game broadcasters. The subject fails Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists and Deletion of List of Atlantic Sun Men's Basketball Tournament Finals broadcasters WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1449 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philadelphia Artists Equity User:Celestina007 11:55, 19 November 2019 (UTC) delete per rationale provided by {{ping|ThatMontrealIP}} , It is a non notable organization & fails per Deletion of Philadelphia Artists Equity WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1450 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taboo album User:RaNdOm26 11:25, 28 July 2007 (UTC) delete Just another case of , plus no reliable sources in the article as backup Deletion of Taboo album WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1451 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The LiveWire (2nd nomination) User:Twsx 11:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC) delete per Deletion of The LiveWire (2nd nomination) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1452 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RIMES (company) User:Lesser 07:16, 25 December 2014 (UTC) delete mdash;Not seeing any in-depth, independent coverage. Fails Deletion of RIMES (company) WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1453 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artemij Sitenkov User:Sue 23:57, 9 December 2012 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Artemij Sitenkov WP:NOTABILITY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1454 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chukka boot User:Belovedfreak 18:21, 22 April 2008 (UTC) keep plenty of coverage in |reliable sources demonstrates notability Deletion of Chukka boot WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1455 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organizations influenced by the Muslim Brotherhood User:Dennisthe2 06:43, 9 April 2012 (UTC) delete Housekeeping). Will be tagged momentarily. In the future, given the nature of this article, this should have been posted in Deletion of Organizations influenced by the Muslim Brotherhood WP:RFD Wikipedia:Redirect 73 +1456 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Patrick Clarke User:Otto4711 14:21, 4 December 2009 (UTC) keep role in Eight is Enough clears the threshold of Deletion of Brian Patrick Clarke WP:ENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1457 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley Maslen-Jones User:Sir 14:43, 11 April 2016 (UTC) delete He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails and Deletion of Bradley Maslen-Jones WP:NSPORT||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1458 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Berkley User:Artene50 10:06, 4 June 2008 (UTC) delete ASAP The nasty tone of this article has been removed:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Susan_Berkley&diff=216954450&oldid=216944662 here but I hardly think this article's creator Lexlex has Susan Berkley's best intentions at heart in making this article. This appears to be a '''character assassination''' Also much of the info is from her web site which cannot be considered a Deletion of Susan Berkley WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1459 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mind Mastery NONE NONE delete Seems to be |original research taken directly from a blog http://thavamalargovindasamy.blogspot.com Deletion of Mind Mastery WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +1460 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2Sides User:Kraxler 15:04, 1 August 2015 (UTC) keep passes , see http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/23299010-2sides this, http://www.insidefutbol.com/2014/10/29/it-oozes-class-like-an-essex-night-out-manchester-united-legend-rio-ferdinands-2sides-reviewed/168467/ this, https://emmaloubookblog.wordpress.com/2014/10/29/review-of-2sides-my-autobiography-by-rio-ferdinand/ this, http://isnsoccer.com/news/2014/11/06/2sides-rio-ferdinand-review/ this and http://www.wsc.co.uk/reviews/64-Players/12051-2sides this Deletion of 2Sides WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1461 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silas McGuffers User:Resolute 04:23, 5 October 2006 (UTC) delete per nom and as a failure of Deletion of Silas McGuffers WP:VAIN Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +1462 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vietnamese Community at the National University of Singapore User:Edwardx 22:03, 28 March 2016 (UTC) delete Can't find anything worthwhile either. Fails and Deletion of Vietnamese Community at the National University of Singapore WP:CLUB||WP:ORGDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1463 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Threesomething User:onel5969 15:52, 6 October 2018 (UTC) delete searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass , and certainly doesn't meet Deletion of Threesomething WP:GNG||WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1464 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madhogaria User:Stifle 12:36, 29 March 2009 (UTC) delete per . Possible hoax Deletion of Madhogaria WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1465 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On Meaning User:SBKSPP 03:46, 4 September 2021 (UTC) keep Meets with sources presented by Ofir. They're reliable enough IMV Deletion of On Meaning WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1466 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Googoloctodeciplex User:Dpbsmith 23:24, 20 October 2005 (UTC) delete """Not a real word, not in real use, pure neologism, and perfect illustration of #Wikipedia is not a crystal ball|a word formed on a predictable numeric system (such as """"septenquinquagintillion""""). Such words are """"not encyclopedic unless they are defined on good authority, or genuinely in use""" Deletion of Googoloctodeciplex WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1467 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mundane astrology NONE NONE keep I suppose people haven't even bothered to look up sources? I would say shame on you, but AfD no longer surprises me. Voters just don't bother doing the due diligence needed. I should really start a proposal to make a policy. Anyways, sources Deletion of Mundane astrology WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +1468 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael ocean User:Addhoc 11:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC) delete has |conflict of interest concerns and doesn't appear to be sufficiently notable Deletion of Michael ocean WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +1469 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian Muslim Party User:Coolabahapple 12:45, 19 February 2016 (UTC) delete a case of Deletion of Australian Muslim Party WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +1470 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dieselpunk (3rd nomination) User:Duggy 22:04, 3 June 2010 (UTC) keep """Issues with |original research, |verifiability, and |notability are best handled by editing adding tags, removing uncited/poorly cited material. If that leaves a stub or something that needs merging or deleting it can be brought up then. The claim that """"It attempts to retroactively place creative works into a genre when their creators had no intent to do so, or likely any knowledge of it"""" is confusing intent & result. If citable experts say that something was """"the beginings of"""" a genre, """"show signs of what was to become"""" a genre or are """"proto""""-genre then add them. Creators often refuse labels because they like to see themselves as unique or are too close to their own work. Deletion is not the answer, work is. If you think this article needs deletion, remove bad citation, add cite tags, remove bad content, if you think it needs keeping find better citations. Once that's been done we will be in a better position to decide what to do with it""" Deletion of Dieselpunk (3rd nomination) WP:OR||WP:V||WP:N Wikipedia:No original research 12 +1471 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vandita Dhariyal User:Accesscrawl 03:06, 4 November 2018 (UTC) keep Passes and . Sources mentioned in RS are reliable Deletion of Vandita Dhariyal WP:GNG||WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1472 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neon Synthesis User:doomsdayer520 15:12, 6 March 2021 (UTC) delete It turns out that they have a media mention in a reliable source, Blabbermouth: https://www.blabbermouth.net/news/neon-synthesis-completes-work-on-debut-album/. Unfortunately a basic album announcement is not particularly |significant. Otherwise I can only find them at the |usual retail and streaming services. This WP article is old but the edit history shows that it started as a pretty obvious attempt at |promotion, by themselves or a fan back in 2007, with very little of substance added since Deletion of Neon Synthesis WP:SIGCOV||WP:MILL||WP:PROMOTION Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1473 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virago 2 User:Quarl NONE delete as |unverifiable and/or |original research. &mdash Deletion of Virago 2 WP:V||WP:NOR Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1474 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billy Oman User:Guliolopez 23:54, 24 May 2008 (UTC) delete """Fails - no sources, supporting citations or other references offered or available. For reasons of VER alone, should be removed. Also fails - the """"highest level in amateur sports"""" in this context is a place with the national team. Transport F.C. are hardly top-flight. Even Bohs at the time were also a struggling team. If Oman helped Bohs to any major silverware I could see a case, but Bohs didn't win a single piece of silverware in those 2 years (or in fact for about 10 years either side of Oman's tenure""" Deletion of Billy Oman WP:VER||WP:NN Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1475 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClipboardMultiSharer User:Joe 15:41, 22 June 2010 (UTC) delete I can't find |significant coverage for this software Deletion of ClipboardMultiSharer WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1476 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Choichirō Yatani User:David 06:27, 3 November 2013 (UTC) delete for lack of evidence of passing and for not enough continuing interest in his immigration case to pass . There are a few more recent hits mentioning the incident in Google books, but to me the coverage seems incidental — oh by the way here's another outrage that happened and shouldn't we be suspicious that they wouldn't show him their files? That's not much of a basis for an encyclopedia article Deletion of Choichirō Yatani WP:PROF||WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1477 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vytaute Andrijauskaite User:Joe 15:53, 29 November 2009 (UTC) delete I can't find significant coverage for this |actress Deletion of Vytaute Andrijauskaite WP:ENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1478 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riograndense Republic User:Toon05 17:24, 15 July 2008 (UTC) comment I have to point out that the first three sources clearly fail - and can't |verify existence or anything else due to this. The third, a report on the secessionist feeling in southern Brazil only mentions the Riograndense Republic in passing, and does nothing to establish the existence of such a state, just that some organisations in the south exist who want secession Deletion of Riograndense Republic WP:RS||WP:V Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1479 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurie Calzada User:Joseph2302 10:33, 12 May 2015 (UTC) delete As above, she isn't notable as an entrepreneur, speaker or TV host, possibly as an author. However, this article isn't the one that's going to show that- if they are considered notable as an author, I would support , as this is a , with not enough focus on the only possibly notable thing Deletion of Laurie Calzada WP:TNT||WP:ADVERT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +1480 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teddi Gold User:Masumrezarock100 20:26, 24 July 2019 (UTC) delete Doesn't meet Deletion of Teddi Gold WP:SINGER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1481 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Wright (2nd nomination) User:Hello32020 21:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC) delete per #Articles|CSD A7 and #General_criteria|G4 criteria Deletion of Sean Wright (2nd nomination) WP:CSD||WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +1482 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bina Bangsa School User:Phil 15:57, 29 November 2011 (UTC) keep per |our usual practice with http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2006/11/28/schools-stepping-out-thriving-pluit.html verifiable high/secondary schools Deletion of Bina Bangsa School WP:NHS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1483 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HiveOnDemand User:Ihcoyc 16:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC) delete also #G11|unambiguous advertising: ''provides a quick, easy way for individuals and small to medium sized businesses to build, edit and manage dynamic treemaps without the need for specialized IT infrastructure and personnel Deletion of HiveOnDemand WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +1484 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reynold Xin (2nd nomination) User:David 20:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC) delete He's not really an academic, but looking at his citation record https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=X22nUYgAAAAJ he has some highly cited papers, but a relatively low h-index. I think this is an indication more that this is an especially high-citation area within CS, and less something that could be used to pass #C1. His current position in industry makes a more appropriate notability criterion but the case there is also weak Deletion of Reynold Xin (2nd nomination) WP:PROF||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1485 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wellborn, Texas User:Pastor 02:08, 4 July 2009 (UTC) keep Meets standards Deletion of Wellborn, Texas WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1486 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 United Arab Emirates Under-19 Tri-Nation tournament User:Worldbruce 00:34, 27 May 2017 (UTC) keep Nomination fails . The 2015 India Under-19 Tri-Nation has significant coverage in more than just ESPNcricinfo, for example: http://indianexpress.com/article/sports/cricket/india-announce-u-19-squad-for-tri-series/, http://www.thedailystar.net/sports/cricket/youths-leave-india-174205, http://www.theindependentbd.com/printversion/details/23533, http://indianexpress.com/article/sports/cricket/before-u-19-tri-series-a-masterclass/, http://www.news18.com/cricketnext/news/under-19-india-cricketers-gear-up-for-tri-series-1166394.html, http://indianexpress.com/article/sports/cricket/u-19-tri-series-india-remain-unbeaten-seal-final-berth/, http://zeenews.india.com/sports/cricket/under-19-triseries-indian-colts-trounce-afghans-by-104-runs-to-finish-on-top_1827341.html, http://indianexpress.com/article/sports/cricket/u-19-tri-series-rishabh-pant-sizzles-with-ton-india-unbeaten/, http://www.thedailystar.net/sports/cricket/bangladesh-youths-thrashed-final-179971, http://www.daily-sun.com/magazine/details/96197/Bangladesh-Under19-Cricket-team-finished-2nd-in-the-trination-Youth-ODI-/2015-12-04. These six newspapers include Bangladesh's largest English-language newspaper and two major Indian news services (IANS and PTI). Considering this, 2015 India Under-19 Tri-Nation tournament plainly meets . Without searching in as much detail, the same appears to be true for the other two - reliable news organizations in the competing countries covered the event in sufficient detail for us to be able to write a complete encyclopedia article Deletion of 2016 United Arab Emirates Under-19 Tri-Nation tournament WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +1487 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen Maltzahn User:Solarra 08:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC) delete per nom. has a pretty high standard when it comes to notability guidelines, on that alone is grounds for deletion. Also, as the nom indicates, this individual's http://books.google.com/books/about/Trafficked.html?id=Qc9VpvBKuvEC one book fails as well Deletion of Kathleen Maltzahn WP:NPOL||WP:NAUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1488 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orwood, California User:Eggishorn 22:02, 13 August 2020 (UTC) delete Yet another erroneous GNIS designation. Post offices are not indicators of passing because they are not legal recognition and in the context of a RR station a post office may be tied only to postal rail functions and not to a populated place Deletion of Orwood, California WP:GEOLAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1489 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Tourister User:Gene 07:49, 2 November 2008 (UTC) keep Easily meets and Deletion of American Tourister WP:V||WP:NOTE Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1490 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Anthony Hall User:Crisco 13:29, 6 August 2011 (UTC) delete as blatant self-promotion and advertising under |G11 Deletion of David Anthony Hall WP:G11 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +1491 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Area code 856 User:Edison 23:10, 4 July 2007 (UTC) delete per Kesh. Wikipedia is not a directory. This article also fails to show the area code in notable, since only one reference is presented. The fact that there are other articles about area codes only invites adding them to the AFD or nominating them separate, in keeping with Deletion of Area code 856 WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +1492 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Furrh User:RebeccaGreen 07:26, 11 November 2018 (UTC) keep """There was enough coverage in newspapers of the time to meet : ''Philadelphia Daily News'', 16 March 1990, (Jack (Chris Furrh), leader of the primitives, is the only character effectively sketched in this movie. He convincingly intimidates and charms the other boys in the group ...)https://www.newspapers.com/image/186290835/?terms=%22Chris%2BFurrh%22; ''The Baltimore Sun'', two page spread on ''Lord of the Flies'' with an interview with the two lead boys, Getty and Furrh, and the comment """"the boys are all good actors, particularly the leads ...""""https://www.newspapers.com/image/376840460/?terms=%22Chris%2BFurrh%22; the ''Tampa Bay Times'' said Getty's performance was """"no match for Chris Furrh, the intense, though too-puny, Jack"""" https://www.newspapers.com/image/322363746/?terms=%22Chris%2BFurrh%22; though not all coverage was positive - the ''Calgary Herald'' had """"echoing his pale performance is Chris Furrh .... both actors are devoid of emotion"""" https://www.newspapers.com/image/484929014/?terms=%22Chris%2BFurrh%22, and ''The Pittsburgh Press'' said of him in ''A Family for Joe'', """"the self-conscious, amateurish affectations of Chris Furrh as Nick""""https://www.newspapers.com/image/141482139/?terms=%22Chris%2BFurrh%22. The local (to Furrh) ''Austin American-Statesman'' had a profile of him before the premiere of ''Lord of the Flies''.https://www.newspapers.com/image/358757457/?terms=%22Chris%2BFurrh%22%2Bexile""" Deletion of Chris Furrh WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1493 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glen Swan User:Guest9999 00:24, 18 November 2008 (UTC) delete I can't find any |reliable sources on which a |verifiable article could be based. I'd imagine that - given his profession - any sources that did exist would be readily available on-line Deletion of Glen Swan WP:RS||WP:V Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1494 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Roseberry [[User talk:Ravenswing|''' '' Ravenswing '' ''']] 07:33, 10 April 2015 (UTC) delete """Let's examine, for example, the links CrazyAces have posted. The first and fifth sources (from the same source) are fluff blog pieces of the sort debarred by WP:ROUTINE. The second is a mere mention of the subject's name in a list, and therefore can't be used to sustain the notability of the subject. The third reports, credulously, false claims that open grave doubts about it meeting the fact-checking requirement of the GNG and . The fourth is a casual one-sentence mention of the sort the GNG explicitly debars. The sixth is a casual mention. The seventh is the exact same citation as the third; err?As far as being an aikido practitioner goes, that in of itself isn't notable, and anyone connected with martial arts should know that. As far as """"creating a style"""" goes, there are hundreds of guys around the world who claim to have """"created a style,"""" at least for the purposes of declaring themselves 10th dan rainbow belt grandmasters and peddling videos ... my old teacher, a simple black belt in a legit style, sold out and repackaged himself as a similar bullshido peddler. Perhaps Roseberry isn't in that camp: in which case, there are multiple reliable sources saying so. Where are they, please""" Deletion of John Roseberry WP:IRS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1495 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milcho Angelov User:Sir 15:10, 14 November 2012 (UTC) delete per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage. As such, the article fails both and Deletion of Milcho Angelov WP:NSPORT||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1496 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson Williams (3rd nomination) User:Jakejr 06:40, 27 May 2014 (UTC) delete Fails and doesn't appear to be notable for his running. I couldn't access any independent sources to show he meets Deletion of Jackson Williams (3rd nomination) WP:NBOX||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1497 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miles Fisher User:Cirt 11:30, 7 September 2008 (UTC) comment """I have emailed {{user|Erwinfletcher}} in an attempt to resolve the possible issue related to text from http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0279702/bio Miles Fisher's bio page on IMDB, which says it is written by """"Erwin Fletcher"""". If the user agrees to release the work under the GFDL, then that is no longer an issue. In any event, I will work to remove all that info anyways and source everything in the article to additional / secondary sources (though I noticed some were already included as external links, and I have begun to format those and add more""" Deletion of Miles Fisher WP:RS||WP:V Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1498 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Be a Bear User:ShadowHalo 06:12, 9 January 2007 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Be a Bear WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1499 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwayne Boyd User:CaroleHenson 01:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC) delete I really want to vote weak keep. I see https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Dwayne+Boyd%22+actor&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS690US690&oq=%22Dwayne+Boyd%22&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j69i57j0l4.4492j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=%22Dwayne+Boyd%22+actor&tbm=nws some news articles and information about his acting school and related events back to 2010, but I agree that it seems . I'm not finding quite enough at this time Deletion of Dwayne Boyd WP:TOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +1500 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Roman Catholic priests accused of sex offenses User:NancyHeise 20:24, 8 October 2007 (UTC) delete Per Wikipolicy #Directory. There are numerous wikipolicies in to justify deletion of this list of names of accused priests. Besides that, it is really an unethical use of Wikipedia to have a list of accused persons. What if some of these priests are innocent as may be the case with a certain percentage. How cruel is that to have a Directory on Wikipedia with your name on it even if you have never been convicted and are possibly innocent? Also, why would there only be a list for priests? Why not a list for accused public school teachers having sex with students? Once you open the bottle, its hard to put the genie back in. I think this bottle should stay closed (and delete this list Deletion of List of Roman Catholic priests accused of sex offenses WP:NOT||WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1501 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dick Nasty User:Johnuniq 05:23, 11 April 2010 (UTC) delete """per as stated by nom. Further, """"moderately well known for briefly appearing..."""" does not compensate""" Deletion of Dick Nasty WP:PORNBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1502 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annie Morton User:Willthacheerleader18 20:30, 12 November 2018 (UTC) keep per Deletion of Annie Morton WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1503 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Tudor pearl User:Uruiamme 07:25, 21 January 2015 (UTC) comment """I am somewhat taken aback that none of the comments so far have covered the blatant commercialized language in the article, as written. As I tried to make abundantly clear, the entire article, except its title, is written to promote the pearl that recently toured London. (Sure there are news articles about it, but See and .) But the problem is that there are two separate pearls. Are we needing three articles? One for pearl of Kuwait, one for La Peregrina pearl, and one for Mary Tudor pearl? That would be """"fair"""" by splitting off all of the claims and provenance stuff into the specific pearl articles, while the historical object gets its own page I guess? Modifying it is possible, but my opinion is severe curtailment until the sources roll in. The Mary Tudor pearl article is full of speculation as it is... no independent news article says all of these things, just your beloved encyclopedia. If some think the new pearl needs some space here in an article on Wikipedia, fine, but it needs a new title, sources to back up its claims, and cross-references to the controversial subject. Right now the encyclopedia looks to be making all the guesses for the pearl, while the news articles report the lack of provenance""" Deletion of Mary Tudor pearl WP:WHYN||WP:SPIP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1504 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 IBSA World Blind Football Championship User:Thine 18:38, 13 September 2015 (UTC) keep Large amounts of coverage and meets easily Deletion of 2010 IBSA World Blind Football Championship WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1505 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oliver Curry (2nd nomination) User:Xxanthippe 00:15, 29 September 2011 (UTC) delete With GS cites all under 10 fails rof#C1 by a large margin Deletion of Oliver Curry (2nd nomination) WP:P Wikipedia:Portal 50 +1506 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nova Scotia Paramedic Society User:PKT 16:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC) delete fails and . Not notable Deletion of Nova Scotia Paramedic Society WP:GROUP||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1507 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-Reen User:Missvain 23:27, 27 January 2020 (UTC) keep While I think it was ok to delete the album by her a few AfDs above, K-Reen is a superstar in French Guiana. She's won Lindor Awards, which is the Grammy's of French Guiana. I don't expect anyone to know that _ since I'm sure we don't have many editors from French Guiana, but, she is indeed notable and passes . Check out her https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-Reen French Wikipedia article for sources Deletion of K-Reen WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1508 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chanel Santini User:Levivich 04:05, 5 June 2019 (UTC) delete per , because the article subject doesn't meet . The NYTimes piece is significant coverage of the website, not of Santini. The Houston local news piece – it's terrible what happened to her – but it's not significant coverage of her as an entertainer. It's a story about her being a victim of harassment and discrimination; it only briefly mentions what she does for a living. I'm not seeing anything in the article or finding anything online that approachers significant coverage to meet BASIC. Xbiz is a major adult industry award but so what? Awards don't establish notability for entertainers Deletion of Chanel Santini WP:NOTADIRECTORY||WP:BASIC Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1509 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inside (Movie) User:MichaelQSchmidt 21:37, 24 September 2015 (UTC) keep as the https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Inside_%28Movie%29&type=revision&diff=682646498&oldid=682509955 poorly written '''brand new''' article |sent to AFD here as a poor translation from https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D0%BD%D1%83%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0_(%D1%84%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%BC) Serbian Wikipedia or the https://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unutra_(Film) Croatian Wikipedia is a topic https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Inside_%28Movie%29&type=revision&diff=682637871&oldid=682509955 proving itself improvable... and under its Serbian name ''Unutra'' appears to just meet .http://www.seecult.org/vest/odgovornost-za-izborhttp://rs.sputniknews.com/vesti/20150307/542907.htmlhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inside_(Movie)#Reception Folks, is really a nice tool to use Deletion of Inside (Movie) WP:BITE||WP:NF||WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers 56 +1510 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Cookson User:P199 17:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC) delete fails . Vanity article Deletion of Ann Cookson WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1511 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rap brief User:Xymmax 14:51, 29 January 2009 (UTC) delete """not that this particular AfD has a chance post-Uncle G's response. Bethbar5, the ABA Journal and appellate court's opinion and AP story confirm that the rapping occurring, and was successful - verifiable if you prefer. It still isn't notable. It's a (legal) news story about something novel. The sources do not describe a """"techinque"""" - the article makes a leap that the sources do not. This interplay between and OTNEWS is often confused, and I don't pretend that I always get it right. Still, this is not currently, and lacks sources to become, an encyclpedia article""" Deletion of Rap brief WP:N||WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1512 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Tolleson User:Shelbystripes 03:59, 12 January 2020 (UTC) keep Based on sources found and linked by above commenters, this appears to pass , and with it, Deletion of Jeremy Tolleson WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1513 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Little User:Resolute 00:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC) delete nonsense, likely , probable hoax. Reads like a very poorly written autobiography Deletion of Chris Little WP:NFT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +1514 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grizzly City 3 User:Joaquin008 17:50, 29 August 2010 (UTC) delete Fails |notability criteria for albums Deletion of Grizzly City 3 WP:NALBUM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1515 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuhina Das User:Celestina007 18:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC) comment Above is an evaluation of the “sources”, provided above and the “piece” they optimized, all have been evaluated and still fall below the threshold of , is not satisfied at all or in any manner as the article’s subject is yet to feature in significant multiple roles and have not won a prestigious award reserved for actors Deletion of Tuhina Das WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1516 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Romanian protests User:E 19:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC) keep Major deal political moment within national politics; adequately sourced to pass Deletion of 2015 Romanian protests WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1517 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory P. Leichner User:Coredesat 04:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Gregory P. Leichner WP:HOAX Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes 40 +1518 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Montgomery Keillor User:Capitalistroadster 06:09, 5 December 2005 (UTC) delete """some claims to notability but not nearly enough to meet . Besides, """"I know virtually every Postmaster in B.C. and Alberta and you are the most articulate Postmaster I have met across fully two provinces"""" could possibly go on BJAODN""" Deletion of Kenneth Montgomery Keillor WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1519 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delphonse the Frowny Clown User:Fuhghettaboutit 13:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC) delete No |attribution in article; one Google web hit; no Google news or book hits; and critically, no results for a Worldcat search http://www.worldcat.org/search?qt=worldcat_org&q=Delphonse+the+Frowny+Clown&submit=Search and no listing or ISBN at the Library of Congress http://catalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?Search_Arg=Delphonse+the+Frowny+Clown+&Search_Code=TALL&PID=24271&SEQ=20070318094640&CNT=25&HIST=1. Accordingly, nothing here satisfying any criteria at and not even meeting any threshold standards listed there Deletion of Delphonse the Frowny Clown WP:ATT||WP:BK Wikipedia:Attribution 34 +1520 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The London Theatre – New Cross User:SwisterTwister 11:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC) keep as found sources confirm Deletion of The London Theatre – New Cross WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1521 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of superheroes (2nd nomination) User:SoWhy 20:16, 25 November 2018 (UTC) keep The stated rationale runs contrary to and thus is not a policy-based reason for deletion. Regards Deletion of Lists of superheroes (2nd nomination) WP:CLN Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates 5 +1522 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graph-tool User:Ihcoyc 16:05, 21 February 2013 (UTC) delete Adding 'python' to the several searches generates very little relevant hits; relevant books are all Wikipedia reprints. Google News search draws a complete blank. Scholar results are mostly irrelevant with the possible exception of http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/30511/InTech-Guisurfer_a_reverse_engineering_framework_for_user_interface_software.pdf this paper, which contains text identical to the Wikipedia article, and notes that this software was used in some unrelated project. Bottom line is that nothing shows that this product has had |significant effects on technology, history, or culture, or that it has any fame or notoriety |beyond the community of Python programmers Deletion of Graph-tool WP:SIGCOV||WP:B2B Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1523 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Parish user:Mamushir 16:48, 9 October 2020 (UTC) delete Fails for not being professional player Deletion of Danny Parish WP:NFOOTY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1524 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Kanohi User:RoySmith 15:09, 5 October 2019 (UTC) merge At first glance, the suggestion to merge seems like a reasonable application of , but this article is all poorly-sourced fancruft, so at best, a very limited merge. The problem is, the target is also a pile of poorly-source francruft, and a merge of this poorly-sourced material would make it even worse Deletion of List of Kanohi WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +1525 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy Parker (transsexual) User:TSO1D 04:14, 27 December 2006 (UTC) delete per nom. Fails Deletion of Lucy Parker (transsexual) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1526 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio Wey User:Bearcat 19:25, 4 February 2018 (UTC) delete """without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can source it better than this. Under , the only notability claim that a radio station actually has to make to be keepable is that it exists as a properly licensed radio station that originates at least some of its own programming — it doesn't need to make any claim that would make it a special """"more notable than other radio stations"""" case, as our goal for radio stations is to be as complete as feasibly possible a reference for ''all'' of them. But """"as feasibly possible"""" is the operative part of that equation, because NMEDIA doesn't extend radio stations an ''exemption'' from having to be |reliably sourced — they still have to be the ''subject'' of at least ''some'' coverage in ''media'' other than their own |self-published content about themselves — but there's virtually no evidence of that being shown here, as the referencing is virtually entirely to |primary sources that can't support notability. So no, it doesn't need a stronger notability ''claim'' than is already present here, but it ''does'' need stronger ''referencing'' to ''support'' it than this""" Deletion of Radio Wey WP:NMEDIA||WP:RS||WP:SELFPUB||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1527 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denise Lutgens User:Pburka 15:55, 18 September 2010 (UTC) delete Not notable. Winner of several non-notable piano competitions, but no news coverage. Article was created by a , possible Deletion of Denise Lutgens WP:SPA||WP:COI Wikipedia:Single-purpose account 21 +1528 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TuneUp Utilities User:FleetCommand 20:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC) keep Article has already established its notability via http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2371494,00.asp PC Magazine (2010), http://www.pcworld.com/article/183313 Gralla, Preston (2009), http://www.laptopmag.com/review/software/tune-up-utilities-2009.aspx Wilson, Jeffrey L (2009), http://majorgeeks.com/review.php?id=18 MarjorGeeks (2004) and http://download.cnet.com/TuneUp-Utilities-2010/3000-18512_4-10206416.html Rosenblatt, Seth (2009). The nominator should definitely read |Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions § Just Not Notable and |Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions § Not Encyclopedic. If there is advertisement in the article, we can re-write that section from a language; but deletion is out of question Deletion of TuneUp Utilities WP:JNN||WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC||WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +1529 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of 88 Films releases User:MichaelQSchmidt 12:12, 15 October 2016 (UTC) keep as a suitable |list article and borrow sources from the MANY blue-linked films on that list. Expand with info from the studio's article Deletion of List of 88 Films releases WP:LISTPURP Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +1530 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OEKC User:WikiDan61 16:50, 15 September 2015 (UTC) delete I'm not finding any |reliable sources about this organization Deletion of OEKC WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1531 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TestingWhiz User:Gongshow 06:10, 6 November 2012 (UTC) delete I am unable to find coverage in reliable sources for this subject; does not appear to meet Deletion of TestingWhiz WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1532 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvey Weinstein sexual misconduct allegations User:Muboshgu 05:02, 14 October 2017 (UTC) keep This clearly meets . –  Deletion of Harvey Weinstein sexual misconduct allegations WP:NEVENTS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1533 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mulan (2020 film) User:Nkon21 02:09, 24 July 2020 (UTC) keep film should be kept per . This film has received plenty of reliable and significant coverage and it had already premiered in Hollywood. It would be quite ridiculous to simply delete it Deletion of Mulan (2020 film) WP:NFP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1534 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Dunford User:Schwede66 05:15, 14 March 2017 (UTC) delete as I can't see how this meets . Whilst there are some foreign language source, and I don't speak those languages, they appear to be |routine coverages rather than in-depth reporting. Just wondering why we haven't heard from the article's creator, {{u|CeeGee}}, as yet? They are a senior editor, and have been active since the AfD was posted Deletion of Brian Dunford WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1535 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Aaron User:Dolovis 03:29, 29 April 2014 (UTC) comment Criteria #10 of NMUSIC states “''Has performed music for a work of media that is notable''”, which is certainly true for this musician who has performed music on many notable albums including Blondie's ''The Hunter (Blondie album)|The Hunter,'' David Bowie's ''Let's Dance (David Bowie album)|Let's Dance'', and Amy Winehouse's ''Frank (Amy Winehouse album)|Frank'' (to name just three of the many notable albums listed in the article). The body of work performed by Robert Aaron over his lengthy musical career is certainly significant, notable, and verifiable by http://www.allmusic.com/artist/robert-aaron-mn0000827693/credits Allmusic.com and the CD lining notes for each album listed in the article. He demonstrably meets Criteria #10, and if news of his arrest (which was added to the article ''after'' its creation) is a violation of then that sentence within the article should properly be removed (as it now has been Deletion of Robert Aaron WP:CRIMINAL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1536 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ROSE Online User:Havok 10:10, 15 November 2006 (UTC) keep Notable, and actually a little bit fun. At least the beta was when I played it. What information that breaks can be removed. Oh, and Google isn't the be all and end all of research; http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/roseonline/index.html GameSpot and http://pc.ign.com/objects/722/722780.html IGN both have information about this game Deletion of ROSE Online WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1537 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Holy Kiss User:TenPoundHammer 20:54, 19 November 2007 (UTC) delete fails all criteria of Deletion of The Holy Kiss WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1538 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Who's Who in Federal Politics in Alberta User:Gilderien 11:08, 21 May 2013 (UTC) delete as it does not meet . The only mentions I can find are vendors or catalogues. It has not won any major literary awards, nor received multiple (or indeed, any) 3rd party reviews, etc Deletion of Who's Who in Federal Politics in Alberta WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1539 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petro photoglyph User:Catfish 16:10, 27 July 2010 (UTC) delete Clearly against and Deletion of Petro photoglyph WP:FRINGE||WP:SPS Wikipedia:Fringe theories 44 +1540 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep Knowledge Ventures User:Northamerica1000 04:37, 17 January 2016 (UTC) keep Meets : http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/30/business/computers-ceo-boardroom-robot-boss/, http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/05/18/software_appointed_to_board_of_venture_capital_firm/, http://motherboard.vice.com/read/the-robot-turned-venture-capitalist-exec-isnt-giving-interviews, http://www.businessinsider.com/vital-named-to-board-2014-5, http://observer.com/2014/05/v-c-firm-names-robot-to-board-of-directors/, http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/05/15/artificial-intelligence-board-directors_n_5329370.html, http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-27426942 Deletion of Deep Knowledge Ventures WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1541 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Cavilla User:Valenciano 13:13, 14 May 2012 (UTC) delete """coverage simply isn't there so the subject fails both and . Arguments along the lines of """"I reckon this should be in Wikipedia"""" have no basis in policy and are specifically discouraged per """ Deletion of Charles Cavilla WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:ILIKEIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1542 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VAPH User:Ilyushka88 09:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC) delete """per notability. Google search for ''""""VAPH""""'' gives results of some belgian company. Results for ''""""VAPH Shoes""""'' seem to be mostly retailers. Also, . Removing self promotion from the article would not leave with much content""" Deletion of VAPH WP:SOAP Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1543 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip McRae User:Blackngold29 20:18, 29 June 2008 (UTC) delete per nom and Deletion of Philip McRae WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +1544 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eöl User:Devonian 06:15, 2 March 2020 (UTC) merge to Thingol, where he is mentioned. There is only one secondary source given, John D. Rateliff's history of the hobbit, I cannot tell if it gives more than a passing mention of this character but one source is not enough to pass in any case Deletion of Eöl WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1545 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Way of a Man with a Maid User:Pablomismo 20:47, 15 October 2009 (UTC) keep This article badly needs rewriting, but there seems to be enough sourcing. |WP:ZOMG!!!!!VICTORIANPR0N!!! is not in itself a valid reason to delete.   Deletion of The Way of a Man with a Maid WP:IDONTLIKEIT Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +1546 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Essex bus route 804 (2nd nomination) User:Colonel 09:39, 14 February 2009 (UTC) keep Inherently notable. Better alternatives to deletion need consideration per , e.g. merger to List of bus routes in Essex Deletion of Essex bus route 804 (2nd nomination) WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +1547 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anup Ghoshal User:MacGyverMagic 13:57, 10 December 2008 (UTC) keep Hi, Article was improved by creator by including good references after its nomination. The article was nominated because only single reference was pointing to http://www.anupghoshal.com offical website of Anup Ghoshal, which is not fair according to guidelines. as noted by Deletion of Anup Ghoshal WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1548 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stop Biden Agenda User:Hulatam 13:42, 26 February 2021 (UTC) delete Current sources doesn't show Deletion of Stop Biden Agenda WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1549 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airbrite User:HighKing 15:38, 20 August 2018 (UTC) comment No. |Notability isn't inherited applies Deletion of Airbrite WP:NOTINHERIT Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +1550 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgi Yochev User:Chiro725 17:49, 22 April 2021 (UTC) comment A silver in 2018 European Youth Weightlifting Championships|European Youth Weightlifting Championships counts for . Not sure about Deletion of Georgi Yochev WP:NSPORTS||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1551 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H. L. Willis User:Clarityfiend 20:25, 26 August 2016 (UTC) delete per nom. Fails , and . Then also delete the other mayors of Pineville, Louisiana, who have the same notability problems, and the mayor template Deletion of H. L. Willis WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1552 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CSANF User:Phil 17:45, 27 March 2009 (UTC) delete """per . No evidence that anyone other than the founders has noticed these """"federations"""" apart from one silly season press article. Part of the fantasy football |walled garden around NF-Board""" Deletion of CSANF WP:NFT||WP:walled garden Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +1553 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Watched By More Americans Than Any Other Network User:Springnuts 20:33, 2 February 2008 (UTC) delete not sure that applies, since some were existing phrases used by the networks, but I agree with the nomination - fails - and with the inclusion of the other articles Deletion of Watched By More Americans Than Any Other Network WP:NEO||WP:N Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +1554 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Body Transfer [[User talk:159.182.1.4|talk]]) 19:25, 10 April 2009 (UTC) keep 1) Has been licensed in France. 2) In what way is it not enough? I've seen this argument used before, but I see nothing under that seems to indicate, like, a number. To my reading, what's there IS enough, once you add the mania review. Special:Contributions/159.182.1.4|159.182.1.4 Deletion of Body Transfer WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1555 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marius Ceteraş User:Peter NONE delete FIDE Master (two levels below Grandmaster (chess)) and no national championships, is insufficient for notability. The article was created by a single edit user - {{Userlinks|Nemo76}} - with lots of detail, so I strongly suspect the article only exists due to editor with issues. His strongest claim to notability would be as a chess author, but it looks to me like the publications are mostly pretty minor ones Deletion of Marius Ceteraş WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +1556 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bean Ball Benny User:Videogameplayer99 05:28, 5 November 2017 (UTC) delete As the article stands now, and per nom, it fails Deletion of Bean Ball Benny WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1557 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricky Shivers User:LlamaAl 23:40, 19 December 2012 (UTC) delete Subject fails and Deletion of Ricky Shivers WP:MMANOT||WP:NMMA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1558 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B.o.B. User:Michig 12:40, 27 October 2008 (UTC) delete As I see it, the article doesn't even assert notability per , let alone demonstrate it Deletion of B.o.B. WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1559 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OSIP User:GoldenRing 13:24, 28 April 2014 (UTC) delete I'm not convinced that the sources cited amount to significant discussion in secondary literature. And if the wikipage contains information useful to software developers, well, Deletion of OSIP WP:NOTMANUAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1560 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funstead User:HisSpaceResearch 18:34, 28 October 2007 (UTC) delete WP:NOT#DICT, , Deletion of Funstead WP:V||WP:NEO Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1561 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irit Rosenblum User:BusterD 22:29, 9 July 2012 (UTC) merge to New Family Organization. Presented references insufficient, IMHO, to pass or ; a reasonable search finds nothing directly detailing, but other more determined searchers may find something which meets WP:IRS. I think a merge is the best option Deletion of Irit Rosenblum WP:BIO||WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1562 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Billboard Top Contemporary Christian Albums number ones of the 1990s User:Pburka 22:27, 10 August 2020 (UTC) keep """Per , """"a chart is normally considered suitable for inclusion if it meets both of the following characteristics: 1) It is published by a recognized reliable source. This includes...Billboard magazine... 2) It covers sales or broadcast outlets from multiple sources."""" See also """ Deletion of List of Billboard Top Contemporary Christian Albums number ones of the 1990s WP:CHARTS||WP:BILLBOARDCHARTS Wikipedia:Record charts 65 +1563 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Black Water Society User:EditorE 00:06, 26 March 2016 (UTC) delete Wikipedia is not a or advertising. I couldn't find a single source even mentioning this book, either that or its WP:TOOSOON, as mentioned above Deletion of The Black Water Society WP:CRYSTALBALL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1564 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ki Chung Kim User:Papaursa 13:19, 19 July 2020 (UTC) delete There is a total lack of any significant independent coverage of him. Passing mentions and school websites do not constitute the coverage necessary to meet . Ranks and halls of fame have never been considered sufficient evidence to show notability in martial arts. I couldn't find any reliable sources that show he meets any of the notability criteria for martial artists Deletion of Ki Chung Kim WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1565 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinesh Nair User:Radagast3 09:30, 1 August 2010 (UTC) delete Fails , , Deletion of Dinesh Nair WP:PROF||WP:N||WP:BLP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1566 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Amor Torres User:Piotrus 08:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC) delete Borderline. Not seeing anything reliable in books or GNews search. Self-marketed princess, but has some media presence. http://nation.lk/edition/fine/people-and-events/item/39230-the-comeback-of-princess-maria-amor-in-sri-lanka.html is short and mentions her in passing (despite the eye-catching title). http://vancouver.24hrs.ca/ur/story/985614 is similar. http://thehollywoodtimes.net/2014/08/12/princess-amor-is-crowned-as-the-traveling-princess/ is e better, but it seems to be a minor media outlet. No mainstream coverage, all I see is minor/vanity/combined with blogs (CNN entries are 'citizen journalism' - iReport). I think it's vanity entry, at best Deletion of Maria Amor Torres WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +1567 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Cully User:Jakejr 14:20, 20 June 2015 (UTC) delete Being tall is not enough to show notability. None of the boxers mentioned meet and there is no significant independent coverage for either Cully or Potgieter Deletion of Jim Cully WP:NBOX Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1568 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serbophobia (fourth nomination) User:Aldux 23:31, 28 December 2006 (UTC) delete this article is nothing more than and its deletion was almost unanimously supported by the board when the question was brought to the /I Deletion of Serbophobia (fourth nomination) WP:OR||WP:AN Wikipedia:No original research 12 +1569 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Western International Hockey League User:Resolute 01:09, 4 May 2010 (UTC) keep the League article, no opinion, leaning delete, on the season articles at present (should they ever formally be added to this nom). The essay does not have guidelines regarding ice hockey leagues, so I'm not certain why you are using it as a basis to argue for deletion. Regardless, this was one of the top senior leagues in Canada at a time when senior hockey held considerably greater prestige as compared to today. Teams from this league competed for the Allan Cup at a time when it was second only to the Stanley Cup in prestige. Easily a notable league Deletion of Western International Hockey League WP:NSPORT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1570 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vira Konstantynova User:Etzedek24 19:07, 7 July 2019 (UTC) delete Interviews can't be used to establish notability per Deletion of Vira Konstantynova WP:IS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1571 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of stations that air Casey Kasem's American Top 40: The 80's [[User talk:137.122.49.102|talk]]) 15:02, 20 April 2010 (UTC) delete per --Special:Contributions/137.122.49.102|137.122.49.102 Deletion of List of stations that air Casey Kasem's American Top 40: The 80's WP:NOTDIR Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1572 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YoungPrince User:Thisizprince 06:19, 13 October 2010 (UTC) delete Young Prince also needs to be salted. Lots of and no Deletion of YoungPrince WP:OR||WP:RS Wikipedia:No original research 12 +1573 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muni Pranamyasagar NONE NONE delete Fails . Look at each source none of them are indepth about Pranamyasagar and are about the event and visits to different states of India Deletion of Muni Pranamyasagar WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1574 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunshine tax User:SudoGhost 18:15, 13 April 2011 (UTC) delete Although I won't argue that it isn't a real thing, it doesn't seem to be |notable Deletion of Sunshine tax WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1575 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Thought I'd Seen Everything (Stevie Vann song) User:Esradekan 12:49, 5 June 2008 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of I Thought I'd Seen Everything (Stevie Vann song) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1576 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X-Terminator User:Footlessmouse 22:34, 12 October 2020 (UTC) delete fails . There is no significant coverage in reliable sources. There is nothing to merge, and a redirect is unnecessary Deletion of X-Terminator WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1577 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summer 2019 (Kylie Minogue) User:Mgbo120 19:12, 16 January 2019 (UTC) delete A case of , yet rich info Deletion of Summer 2019 (Kylie Minogue) WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +1578 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Alured Faunce User:Rinfoli 14:36, 18 April 2014 (UTC) delete WP:GNG and fail Deletion of Thomas Alured Faunce WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1579 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of email marketing service providers User:Bearian 18:01, 10 December 2009 (UTC) delete while there may be many such providers, and many of them may be notable, an encyclopedia |should not be a marketing guide Deletion of Comparison of email marketing service providers WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1580 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/18+ (band) User:Northamerica1000 16:04, 4 April 2015 (UTC) keep Meets . E.g. http://www.laweekly.com/music/is-18-an-art-project-or-a-band-maybe-both-5334797, http://www.clashmusic.com/features/next-wave-623-18, http://www.theguardian.com/music/2014/nov/09/18-plus-trust-review-r-and-b-duo-inscrutable, http://www.irishtimes.com/culture/music/18-trust-1.2067241 Deletion of 18+ (band) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1581 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marie Agba-Otikpo User:Dhartung 21:58, 7 September 2007 (UTC) keep passes : ''Politicians who have held international, national or statewide/provincewide office''. The answer to your question, Lawrence Cohen, is yes Deletion of Marie Agba-Otikpo WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1582 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Violence against animals in India User:ChunnuBhai 12:57, 27 September 2020 (UTC) delete Fails . none of the incidents are notable and are usual news items Deletion of Violence against animals in India WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1583 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garfi (cat) User:Nosebagbear 17:45, 19 July 2018 (UTC) delete fails to meet . There are a couple of later sources but they fail to either be reliable or fail Sig Cov. I'm also inclined a similar way towards DGG's case - as it is, it may well fail A7 Deletion of Garfi (cat) WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1584 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giant (Clash of Clans) User:Odie5533 06:39, 4 December 2016 (UTC) delete all per Reliable secondary sources with significant coverage for each of these do not exist Deletion of Giant (Clash of Clans) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1585 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macedonian Cross User:SWik78 14:10, 17 July 2008 (UTC) delete """None of the claims made by the article could be verified by any of the 200+ http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=%22Macedonian+Cross%22&meta= Google hits for """"Macedonian Cross"""". This is nothing more than """ Deletion of Macedonian Cross WP:CRUFT Wikipedia:Fancruft 61 +1586 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delaware County Intermediate Unit User:Srikeit 14:47, 22 May 2006 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Delaware County Intermediate Unit WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1587 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harrison Odjegba Okene User:WilliamJE 17:45, 5 December 2013 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Harrison Odjegba Okene WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +1588 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iceland in popular culture User:O 01:59, 17 July 2007 (UTC) delete In addition to , #IINFO|Wikipedia isn't an indiscriminate collection of information, which this article clearly is. It's also unsourced, as a number of people have already said. ({{fullurl:User talk:O|action=edit§ion=new}} →O Deletion of Iceland in popular culture WP:TRIVIA||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +1589 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord Castrianni/Lord of Kensington (2007 creation) User:Eddie 03:45, 23 June 2007 (UTC) delete as omplete Bollocks Deletion of Lord Castrianni/Lord of Kensington (2007 creation) WP:C Wikipedia:Copyrights 60 +1590 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The The's User:Capitalistroadster 01:32, 28 October 2005 (UTC) delete """as per and . A Google search for """"The The's"""" Kamloop didn't get any Google results showing verifiability problems see http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=lang_en&c2coff=1&q=%22The+The%27s%22+Kamloop&btnG=Search. There is no allmusic.com page. No evidence of albums released, tours performed or any other indicators showing notability as per """ Deletion of The The's WP:V||WP:music Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1591 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Jalaa Highrise User:Dainomite 05:08, 21 May 2021 (UTC) keep but rename to something akin to Bombing of Al-Jalaa Tower as it meets due to it receiving significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. If this is the direction the AfD goes (the page is renamed for the event) we can establish consensus on the name via a new poll. —   Deletion of Al Jalaa Highrise WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1592 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saniyya Sidney User:Balablitz 13:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC) keep Satisfies Deletion of Saniyya Sidney WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1593 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Joanna Yeates User:ResidentAnthropologist 23:13, 29 December 2010 (UTC) keep We can revisit this in a few months to examine enduring notability is hard to judge at the moment of the NEWS. I suspect greater weight for aruements once coverage is slopps off Deletion of Disappearance of Joanna Yeates WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1594 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Wyda User:Anotherclown 13:04, 13 August 2013 (UTC) delete """minor official lacking """"significant coverage in reliable sources"""" to constitute notability per (a few brief articles in minor newspapers hardly equals """"significant coverage""""). Kendrick7 pls don't bother reply to me too, it really is unseemly replying to every delete vote. You had your say, now let the rest of us do so in good faith pls""" Deletion of Rob Wyda WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1595 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seymore Butts User:Malik 02:43, 18 February 2019 (UTC) keep """Easily passes , probably passes and as well. Those who are recommending deletion: Have you actually ''read'' the article? Glasser (""""Seymore Butts"""") was one of the originators of Gonzo pornography, his film series ''Seymore Butts'' won Best Gonzo Series AVN Awards in 1999 and 2000, he was the subject of a series on Showtime. How much more notable can a director of pornography be? — """ Deletion of Seymore Butts WP:NPORN||WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1596 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abd-Allah ibn Rawahah User:Jersey 06:50, 16 March 2006 (UTC) delete one sentence article that does not meet (no sources) and doesn't really establish notablility Deletion of Abd-Allah ibn Rawahah WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1597 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stripe (company) User:Amitbanerji26 15:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC) keep One of the bigger Paypal competitor and meets . I will suggest rewrite than considering for delete. http://www.forbes.com/sites/miguelhelft/2016/01/04/cashiers-of-the-internet/#24abe55a6afc Forbes, http://www.wsj.com/articles/online-payments-startup-stripe-raises-new-funds-at-5-billion-valuation-1438060715 Wall Street Journal and many more. I request to research in detail, before AFD Deletion of Stripe (company) WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1598 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krishan Lal Chugh User:Northamerica1000 06:56, 2 July 2016 (UTC) comment The article is tagged for speedy deletion per , and in its present state it will likely be deleted per this. However, the subject actually meets (see some source examples below). As such, no prejudice against recreation of a neutral article based upon what reliable sources report about the subject Deletion of Krishan Lal Chugh WP:G11||WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +1599 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lost Angelas User:Epinoia 00:01, 1 May 2019 (UTC) keep or '''Soft delete''' - this is a new film (2019) so it may take some time to build a reputation - I don't think it meets right now, but it could in the future Deletion of Lost Angelas WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1600 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heidtman Steel User:Eggishorn 02:04, 28 December 2016 (UTC) delete advertising and web site copy by SPA that is apparently connected. No coverage that is not Deletion of Heidtman Steel WP:RS||WP:ROUTINE Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1601 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewbook User:E 16:55, 27 November 2018 (UTC) delete this online chat group fails Deletion of Jewbook WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1602 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Travel & Tourism Academy User:AllyD 06:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC) delete Searches are not turning up any |evidence of |notability for this training centre Deletion of International Travel & Tourism Academy :WP:RS||:WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1603 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Company of Heroes: Eastern Front User:Joe 16:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC) delete I can't find |significant coverage for this video game mod Deletion of Company of Heroes: Eastern Front WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1604 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Zhang (scientist) User:King 19:36, 12 July 2020 (UTC) keep Clearly meets with significant coverage in a combination of national (U.S. News, Atlantic) and local (Mercury) sources Deletion of Angela Zhang (scientist) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1605 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eon8 (2nd nomination) User:Ashibaka 16:22, 1 July 2006 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Eon8 (2nd nomination) WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1606 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George B. Mowad User:WilliamJE 23:54, 2 April 2019 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of George B. Mowad WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1607 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. Prasad Babu User:Anir1uph 11:53, 3 June 2014 (UTC) keep WP:ANYBIO and/or would apply as the article's subject was awarded Ashok Chakra, India's highest peace time gallantry award. Also may not apply as the subject is not a living person, hence the article is not a Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|BLP. Apart from that, I do not see any paucity of sources as the person received enough coverage in regional and national publications, but all of these may not be in English (which is never an issue Deletion of K. Prasad Babu WP:MILPEOPLE||WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1608 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linear Programming Language User:Ihcoyc 15:14, 13 November 2009 (UTC) delete """non-consumer software with no showing of |historical or technical importance, also promotional and non-neutral in tone: ''LPL is a powerful modeling language and a full-fetched mathematical modeling system with a point-and-click interface.'' """"Full-fetched""" Deletion of Linear Programming Language WP:MILL Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill 32 +1609 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hana Yori Dango / Meteor Garden (Korean Version) User:AmeIiorate 12:09, 30 May 2008 (UTC) delete Fails , , , , reads like a . Possibly passes CSD#A1. '''~ Ameliorate Deletion of Hana Yori Dango / Meteor Garden (Korean Version) WP:N||WP:OR||WP:WEASEL||WP:FUTURE||WP:ADVERT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1610 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahadeva Sambasivan User:Radagast3 23:40, 5 March 2010 (UTC) delete fails due to lack of sources. This person probably '''is''' notable, but the article in its present state is too flawed. There '''was''' a former Vice Principal of that name at Thiruvananthapuram Medical College,http://www.govtmedicalcollegetvm.net/html/Old%20Vice%20Principals.htm and he was a professor there.http://www.thehindu.com/2009/07/02/stories/2009070254710700.htm The bulk of the article is a list of publications, which are not necessarily all by the same person (the 1964 article seems to be by a paediatrician of the same name). I would support a better (properly sourced) article on this person Deletion of Mahadeva Sambasivan WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +1611 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John David Washington User:Grandmasterka 02:03, 3 May 2006 (UTC) keep revisit if he never plays an NFL game. Otherwise I believe he fits Deletion of John David Washington WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1612 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henrietta the four-legged chicken User:Sandstein 07:03, 7 February 2007 (UTC) delete Trivial news item, wich for Deletion of Henrietta the four-legged chicken WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1613 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brain Injury Law Center User:Rhododendrites 16:42, 25 October 2014 (UTC) delete not seeing sufficient reliable secondary sources. Fails . --&mdash Deletion of Brain Injury Law Center WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1614 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voice chasing User:UnitedStatesian 14:11, 2 December 2008 (UTC) delete No sources; violates the core |Verifiability policy Deletion of Voice chasing WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1615 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xheni Çuni User:Arthistorian1977 15:35, 22 December 2016 (UTC) delete Obviously fails both and Deletion of Xheni Çuni WP:CREATIVE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1616 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subconscious User:Bearian 23:56, 15 March 2010 (UTC) keep """whether it exists or not doesn't matter at enWP; only that it can be |verified. The article states, """"In everyday speech and popular writing, however, the term is very commonly encountered as a layman's replacement for the unconscious mind. The ... term is prominent in the New Age and self-help literature, in which investigating or controlling its supposed knowledge or power is seen as advantageous."""" If you ask 10 Wikipedians, probably 7 would agree it's a notable term. It's defined by http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=subconscious+definition&aq=4sx&aqi=g-s2g-sx1g-s1g-sx6&aql=&oq=subconsious hundreds of dictionaries. There are http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&source=hp&q=subconscious&aql=&oq=subconsious&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws over 100,000 Ghits at Google scholar. It's a word used in the news http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&source=hp&q=subconscious&aql=&oq=subconsious&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=sn hundreds of times each week. This is an easy rescue""" Deletion of Subconscious WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1617 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. P. Calderon User:Black 21:15, 24 February 2007 (UTC) keep Yes, consensus can change, but not this fast. I won't say that the nomination is as the nom may not have checked the talk page Deletion of J. P. Calderon WP:POINT Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +1618 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Generation Jones User:Hit 14:52, 16 August 2006 (UTC) keep """I disagree with any notion of a """"Google test"""", since 99% of the stuff on the web doesn't meet . That said, there are a fair number of reliable sources out there for this term: CNNhttp://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/03/05/generation.jones/index.html, The Cincinnati Enquirerhttp://www.enquirer.com/editions/1999/11/12/loc_who_is_generation.html, The Columbia Daily Tribunehttp://www.columbiatribune.com/2006/Jul/20060724Life001.asp, Scoop (news website)http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0509/S00161.htm, Entrepreneur magazinehttp://www.entrepreneur.com/article/0,4621,271536,00.html, etc. As such, the article needs cleanup, not deletion""" Deletion of Generation Jones WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1619 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beachbody User:CNMall41 02:35, 26 January 2019 (UTC) keep The company is best known for P90X which was a workout fad about 10 years back and could be a likely merge target. However, based on https://www.forbes.com/sites/laurengensler/2018/04/10/beachbody-carl-daikeler-shakeology/#2eae874f7960 this Forbes piece which appeared in print and online from a staff writer and https://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-beachbody-20170829-story.html this Los Angeles Times article which isn't flattering, the company meets . What I would suggest is a merger of the P90X and PiYo pages into the Beachbody page as the others are merely s of the company's products. It this is kept, ping me and I will be happy to perform the merge Deletion of Beachbody WP:NCORP||WP:CFORK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1620 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWFJ User:Superastig 15:30, 8 June 2021 (UTC) keep The station is licensed by the NTC as it indicates an operator having a station. It was initially issued a PA per http://storage.googleapis.com/request-attachments/AV4y9qh3QvqYRdiDILKyN9nVIEnGnFovM9uuKB8iRaRW7PRrO633PGaXjSEULkqvEmjorBtVejJ00OBQf6uq5cH0nMZNFTt12UrY/FM%20STATIONS_2019.pdf 2019 NTC Listing. It was only http://storage.googleapis.com/request-attachments/krwjuYylHVSLLIneBnTI5jc9Tbe8fFM96hdHaRzlgo7uawnkM2AZ1usAzYkN26EeDvlaV0yL56GpT830ccMGHZyTnhk31ReKna5l/FM%20Listing.pdf last year's listing when it was given a callsign. That said, the article is good enough to pass /OUTCOMES Deletion of DWFJ WP:BCAST||WP:BCASTOUTCOMES Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1621 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IF function User:Andjam 01:08, 23 April 2006 (UTC) delete Nothing wrong with it, except that Wikipedia is |not an instruction manual. More suited to wikibooks, but transwiki probably isn't appropriate unless there's an existing project on this topic Deletion of IF function WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1622 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick McClean User:CAPTAIN 18:44, 10 April 2017 (UTC) delete non-notable footballer. Fails Deletion of Patrick McClean WP:NFOOTY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1623 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States public officials accused of crimes User:Aaron 04:48, 20 October 2006 (UTC) delete per nom and Husond. Interesting concept, but definitely a concern and the list is potentially endless Deletion of List of United States public officials accused of crimes WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +1624 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Wesley Rawles User:Bulldog123 00:07, 3 May 2008 (UTC) delete Weak notability, . Everything said by Verdatum really Deletion of James Wesley Rawles WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +1625 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaos Prevails User:Esradekan 13:54, 15 April 2008 (UTC) delete article fails to establish notability as per Deletion of Chaos Prevails WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1626 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Rose LeBrecht User:Missvain 16:47, 21 May 2021 (UTC) delete Appears to be for the subject to have her own article. The sourcing in the article does not help her meet nor . I did my own due diligence, using her name and her stage name Greenpot Bluepot and found little to nothing. Her real name just brought up the usual suspects of primary sources and websites to download her music. Greenpot Bluepot had small fry local publications and blogs Deletion of Natalie Rose LeBrecht WP:TOOSOON||WP:GNG||WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +1627 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Clarke Cunningham User:Mkdw 08:13, 8 March 2007 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Elizabeth Clarke Cunningham WP:N||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1628 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herbert midgley User:MastCell 20:42, 27 June 2007 (UTC) delete Fails - no reliable secondary sources establishing notability Deletion of Herbert midgley WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1629 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bianca Kmiec User:Power 18:13, 11 May 2017 (UTC) keep """As - """"Has a large fan base or a significant """"cult"""" following""" Deletion of Bianca Kmiec WP:NMODEL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1630 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bülent Gökay User:PWilkinson 12:20, 13 April 2013 (UTC) comment """Stubbing a fairly long article and then stating """"virtually no information"""" as the primary reason for deletion is probably not to be recommended as a course of action - although stubbing, in this case, was admittedly almost completely unavoidable as the original article was an unwikified resume probably copy and pasted (by someone with obvious COI) from somewhere else. As to the subject's notability - I'm completely undecided. A professor at a middle-ranking English university has a good, but far from certain, chance of meeting on one or more criteria. Though, looking at the likely ones - British professorships are sufficiently less common than, for instance, American ones that the possibility of #5 should be considered, but they are sometimes awarded for administrative responsibilities one or two levels below what could justify #6, and this looks quite possible in this case. Otherwise, the subject has what looks like quite a long and respectable publication record, mostly in English but partly in Turkish, some of which looks probably well-cited considering his areas of research. The problem, made more difficult by the rather random order of the GScholar results, is judging whether he meets #1 - chances are, I think, that he doesn't quite, but I'm really not sure""" Deletion of Bülent Gökay WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1631 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GREENSOLE (2nd nomination) User:Kinu 18:30, 6 April 2020 (UTC) delete per the nominator's thorough rationale. While masquerading as an article, it is thinly-veiled advertising with nothing substantive to show is met Deletion of GREENSOLE (2nd nomination) WP:NCOMPANY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1632 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Worthington User:Cunard 06:22, 12 September 2009 (UTC) comment The above links provided by Location have not convinced me of Alfred Worthington's notability per , so I have relisted this AfD to see if anyone can uncover more sources Deletion of Alfred Worthington WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1633 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ska Punk And Other Junk User:Scorpiondollprincess 15:58, 9 August 2006 (UTC) keep Site has been around almost a decade -- that's a lifetime by web standards. I'm borderline on this one, but I think this is a attempt at a legitimate article Deletion of Ska Punk And Other Junk WP:GF Wikipedia:Assume good faith 53 +1634 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Kontras (3rd nomination) NONE NONE delete Fails . From the last discussion Deletion of Adam Kontras (3rd nomination) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1635 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Abdur Rehman Cheema (2nd nomination) User:Celestina007 08:34, 01 November 2017 (UTC) keep As per and . This article merits a space on the encylopedia Deletion of Amir Abdur Rehman Cheema (2nd nomination) WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GOLDENRULE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1636 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pauline Campbell User:Willsome429 15:35, 28 November 2018 (UTC) delete a search shows no significant coverage Deletion of Pauline Campbell WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +1637 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda George (Assyrian singer) User:TonyTheTiger 21:08, 6 March 2015 (UTC) comment I deded this because however modest her notability may be it is likely understated on ENG WP due to the nature of her notability being a non-English artform. I think we English speakers may have just brushed her aside and I want this case to be given full consideration Deletion of Linda George (Assyrian singer) WP:PROD Wikipedia:Proposed deletion 92 +1638 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Etienne Mendy User:GiantSnowman 13:12, 8 January 2012 (UTC) keep the quickest of Google searches would have shown that this player meets , as confirmed by http://www.ligue1.com/joueur/mendy-etienne this (among many others). Article needs improving, not deleting Deletion of Etienne Mendy WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1639 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Kei Nishikori tennis season User:Dirtlawyer1 12:54, 18 May 2015 (UTC) delete """per established consensus of WP:TENNIS. Please also note that this subject also fails to satisfy the general notability guidelines per for a stand-alone article -- rarely do individual """"seasons"""" of tennis players satisfy these requirements with in-depth coverage of the ''season'' -- not the individual matches, not the player, not the player's promotional work or personal life, etc. -- for a stand-alone article""" Deletion of 2015 Kei Nishikori tennis season WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1640 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John G. Jensen User:RayAYang 05:23, 12 September 2010 (UTC) comment The university webpage linked from the article serves to confirm his existence and his profession. An article in the Macon Telegraph http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=MT&s_site=macon&p_multi=MT&p_theme=realcities&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB76E14EDA0E7E6&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM confirms that he was commissioned by the town of Richmond Hill to build a statue of Henry Ford. Here's a profile in a local newspaper of his work http://savannahnow.com/louise-shannon-martin/2008-01-09/local-artist-creates-whimsical-other-pieces-life. If this were all I could find, I would not say that is met. But this is what I could find in 10-15 minutes of online searching. I suspect a more interested researcher might find more, leaving this article marginal as far as notability goes. That said, this is no slam dunk Deletion of John G. Jensen WP:CREATIVE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1641 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Policide User:Amoruso 12:42, 24 October 2006 (UTC) keep Seems like a nomination without any reasoning. The article is well sourced and very encyclopedic. Speedy keep Deletion of Policide WP:POV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +1642 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathias Harter User:Bearcat 18:01, 6 October 2016 (UTC) delete """A ''well-sourced'' and ''substantive'' article about a mayor could potentially be kept regardless of the city's size, but does ''not'' confer an automatic ''presumption'' of notability on all mayors. A city would have to be ''twice'' the size of La Crosse before his mere existence as a mayor was a compelling enough claim of notability in and of itself to get the """"keep and flag for refimprove"""" treatment rather than the """"delete"""" treatment""" Deletion of Mathias Harter WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1643 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valley of Decapitated Horses User:Ihcoyc 15:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC) delete In case you're curious, this is about a band (got to point that out, folks! I thought for a minute that this might be a real estate development named by someone whose thoughts run free in the same fields as mine.) The instant article contains little outside information confirming notability per . If it ain't on any of the metal sites, it may well be a hoax Deletion of Valley of Decapitated Horses WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1644 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silvan Elves User:Zxcvbnm 07:24, 13 March 2020 (UTC) delete Fails . Entirely original research, and therefore, nothing to merge. No obvious target, and therefore it is better if users utilize the search function Deletion of Silvan Elves WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1645 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jane Gibian User:CiaranG 23:29, 19 January 2007 (UTC) delete My own brief research didn't turn up anything to indicate that this might satisfy Deletion of Jane Gibian WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1646 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Sawchuk User:Kraxler 15:12, 13 April 2015 (UTC) keep """She seems to be notable, among other things, under # 8 """"''The person is or has been the head or chief editor of a major well-established academic journal in their subject area.''"""" In http://coms.concordia.ca/faculty/sawchuk.html this source she is presented as """"the editor"""" of the ''Canadian Journal of Communications''. """"The editor"""" would mean there is only one editor, and that is the """"head"""" of the journal as required under this criterion. The journal is described as a """"''nationally and internationally renowned journal in the field publishing work in communications, media studies, cultural studies and journalism""" Deletion of Kim Sawchuk WP:NACADEMICS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1647 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Info Mesa User:Be 04:33, 17 April 2015 (UTC) delete """two unconvincing references in obscure journals for """"many survived""""/""""many died"""" |weasels, two self-published, only one good reference. &ndash""" Deletion of Info Mesa WP:WEASEL Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +1648 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flytrap User:segv11 06:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC) delete WP:NOT a crystal |ball Deletion of Flytrap WP:BALLS Wikipedia:Complete bollocks 62 +1649 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Bachour User:Msnicki 02:18, 14 July 2014 (UTC) delete """His company was """"sold to an unnamed tech giant for an undisclosed amount"""" and there's """"speculation"""" it was Apple? This is what Wikipedia has become? Surely not! Completely lacking reliable independent secondary sources as required by . Googling turned up absolutely nothing. Stick a fork in it. This one is done""" Deletion of Eric Bachour WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1650 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of commercial failures in computer and video gaming User:Koffieyahoo 00:57, 10 August 2006 (UTC) delete """as """"commercial failure"""" has written |original research all over it""" Deletion of List of commercial failures in computer and video gaming WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +1651 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dataway User:Adrian 21:01, 16 March 2006 (UTC) delete as |non-notable corporation, and I've never heard anyone else in this field mention them Deletion of Dataway WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1652 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Casbolt User:Schuym1 13:46, 4 December 2008 (UTC) delete No reliable sources that show notability per Deletion of James Casbolt WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1653 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Murtagh User:Guliolopez 23:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC) delete """per nom and . Precedent is interesting though. There are several other articles on '':Category:Rose of Tralee|Roses'', all of reach read like NN bios plucked from competition press packs. Only Aoibhinn Ní Shúilleabháin has any notability beyond the event. Unless you count some subjects participation in the (...ahem...) """"Celebrity"""" Charity You're A Star""" Deletion of Lisa Murtagh WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +1654 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battlefield: Apocalypse User:Royboycrashfan 04:18, 29 March 2006 (UTC) delete I'm pretty sure this is Deletion of Battlefield: Apocalypse WP:CRUFT Wikipedia:Fancruft 61 +1655 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonio Siyaka User:BlameRuiner 18:12, 27 July 2014 (UTC) keep per . Here's some media coverage: http://fcdnepr.by/2407-kadry Siyaka promoted to Dnepr's senior team, http://by.tribuna.com/tribuna/blogs/orsha_terminal/639306.html This year's most promising young players of the league Deletion of Antonio Siyaka WP:NFOOTY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1656 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Hayr User:Lugnuts 16:48, 12 September 2018 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Al Hayr WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1657 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demo Collection 1992 - 1993 User:Darth 22:02, 2 August 2008 (UTC) delete per #Albums and Deletion of Demo Collection 1992 - 1993 WP:MUSIC||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1658 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All wet User:Metropolitan90 14:33, 29 September 2011 (UTC) delete Just a |dictionary definition of a phrase, which is already :wikt:all_wet|listed in Wiktionary anyway Deletion of All wet WP:WINAD Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +1659 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fallout: The Health Impact of 9/11 (2nd nomination) User:Wadester16 07:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC) delete I agree with the past consensus and have little faith in the easy Google hits. and need more than what is offered Deletion of Fallout: The Health Impact of 9/11 (2nd nomination) WP:NF||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1660 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emil Nielsen User:Crystallizedcarbon 18:17, 21 January 2015 (UTC) delete per nom, could not find with in depth coverage to establish |notability Deletion of Emil Nielsen WP:RS||WP:N Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1661 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corinne Narassiguin User:Sylvainbruni 16:23, 12 May 2012 (UTC) keep I am a Frenchman in Boston and Corinne Narassiguin *is* a politician: she was elected in 2009 to represent French people who live on the East Coast of the United States (consular districts of Boston, New York, Washington, Atlanta and Miami) at the French Expatriates Assembly. She is the Vice-President of one of the commissions in the Assembly. She is very well known amongst French citizens in the United States. Furthermore, I disagree that she fails since she has been covered in independent French, Canadian and American media, including appearances on major national TV programs such as Charlie Rose (PBS) in the US or CBC in Canada.— Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Deletion of Corinne Narassiguin WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1662 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giovanni Battista Armenini User:FreeRangeFrog 00:17, 28 December 2012 (UTC) keep Author of a notable historical book about painting. Meets and . The book is important enough to be included in the virtual library of the Istituto Nazionale di Studi sul Rinascimento (the Italian National Institute for the study of the Renaissance) http://bivio.filosofia.sns.it/bvWorkTOC.php?authorSign=ArmeniniGiovanBattista&titleSign=DeVeriPrecettiDellaPittura, and 23 editions of its English translation are held by more than 350 libraries http://www.worldcat.org/title/on-the-true-precepts-of-the-art-of-painting/oclc/003169161 worldwide. A case of perhaps the book being more notable than the author, so no prejudice to a move to On the true precepts of the art of painting, leaving a redirect behind and incorporating the author's bio. However, even with the primary sources (and heck, this is the 15th century after all) I think a standalone bio is merited Deletion of Giovanni Battista Armenini WP:AUTHOR||WP:CREATIVE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1663 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Bossé User:Papaursa 00:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC) delete Doesn't meet , , or Deletion of Steve Bossé WP:NMMA||WP:NHOCKEY||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1664 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corruption in Cuba User:Luis 15:12, 5 April 2009 (UTC) comment Cosmic Latte, this is not for merging discussions. You can e bold|be bold and merge the content into Politics in Cuba if you want Deletion of Corruption in Cuba WP:B Wikipedia:Bots 91 +1665 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Sokol User:MER 07:46, 6 January 2007 (UTC) delete no evidence of meeting Deletion of Jason Sokol WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1666 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Pulsford User:Coren 00:44, 8 September 2007 (UTC) delete notability is indeed |not transitive, and I can find no indication that this musician has notability of his own, so he falls much short of . —  Deletion of Jan Pulsford WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:BAND Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +1667 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singapore Hokkien Huay Kuan User:Lionratz 08:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC) keep The article meets most, if not all of the criteria set out in . The problem seems to stem from poor referencing practices by editors, which I have now rectified Deletion of Singapore Hokkien Huay Kuan WP:NONPROFIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1668 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divided Skies (2nd nomination) User:Tucoxn 06:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC) delete Does not meet because of a lack of significant coverage in reliable sources, even after a search Deletion of Divided Skies (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1669 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dean Howes [[User talk:Bullzeye|Complaint Dept.]]/[[Special:Contributions/Bullzeye|Contribs)]] 23:41, 26 July 2007 (UTC) delete """Merely throwing down """"related"""" links and calling them references doesn't make the subject meet . Bullzeye""" Deletion of Dean Howes WP:NOTE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1670 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahnoor Baloch User:Master 11:52, 8 December 2011 (UTC) delete mdash; There is some credibility to the article's assertions of notability, being that she ''is'' in fact a moderately well known model and actress in Pakistan. A http://www.google.ca/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=hts&oq=&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4RNWN_enCA217CA221&q=Mahnoor+Baloch Google search yields several relevant results, and she has a starring role in a Pakistani television series that has Chaandni Raatain|its own article on Wikipedia, but even that one Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaandni Raatain|barely survived AfD back in 2008. This is a borderline case, and I prefer to err on the side of caution when it comes to barely notable |living people Deletion of Mahnoor Baloch WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +1671 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Lebanese Army Martyrs during Nahr el Bared Operation User:JulesH 22:13, 5 December 2008 (UTC) comment I have retitled the page to List of Lebanese Army soldiers killed during Nahr el Bared Operation to avoid violation Deletion of List of Lebanese Army Martyrs during Nahr el Bared Operation WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +1672 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Morgan (musician) User:Raaggio 17:03, 9 April 2010 (UTC) delete After using |the Bing search engine to verify notability, I noticed that there are very few sources, let alone |reliable ones. Due to , , and, in my opinion, , the article should be deleted Deletion of Ashley Morgan (musician) WP:SET||WP:RL||WP:RL||WP:SET||WP:N Wikipedia:Search engine test 49 +1673 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erick Schat's Bakkerÿ User:Piotrus 05:08, 17 November 2015 (UTC) delete as failing (regional/in-passing coverage) but I'd also suggest that the content should be merged to Wikivoyage article about the city, where it can be a valid POI, with its current description copied there. http://legacy.utsandiego.com/uniontrib/20060212/news_1t12schats.html is good enough that it would warrant a mention of the business place at the city's article, too. But I don't feel it's enough to support a stand alone notability Deletion of Erick Schat's Bakkerÿ WP:COMPANY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1674 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accusations against Israel of war crimes during the Al-Aqsa Intifada User:Jayjg 03:31, 14 January 2007 (UTC) delete """obvious article, and votes solicited at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Islam should be discounted. '''Also, almost none (or is there even one?) of the """"sources"""" actually seems to refer to """"war-crimes""" Deletion of Accusations against Israel of war crimes during the Al-Aqsa Intifada WP:SOAP Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1675 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stray cow problem in India User:First 19:13, 24 August 2010 (UTC) merge """in spite of author's recent request to close as """"delete"""". The main problem with the article is the horribly POV title (which doesn't meet naming policy for neutrality - ), and the lack of balanced content. An article titled Cows in India or Cattle in India probably merits a WP article. It would cover the overall treatment of cows in India, veneration by some religions and people, laws against killing cows in some regions, and yes, the problem with strays (and also the idea, if sourced, that some people don't see it as a problem), and the situation with non-'cow' cattle""" Deletion of Stray cow problem in India WP:NDESC Wikipedia:Article titles 18 +1676 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed, Edd n Eddy's Big Picture Show [[User talk:Treelo|treelo]] [[Special:Contributions/Treelo|radda]] 03:02, 13 August 2009 (UTC) delete I'm yet to see a decent reason as to why this article should be kept, so far the reasons for are that it should be kept through inherited notability and to wait a year before requesting again, the last one striking me as the least reasoned !vote here as it doesn't say why a year's wait should be enough. I guess it could be some kind of bizzaro-|recentism logic but I'll await further clarification. Even with the many AfDs proceeding this, they were for crystal-balling so a bit moot here. The lack of sourcing for this overlong synopsis along with no establishment of individual notability separate from the series doesn't give me much confidence in this article's future though I expect it to be recreated several times before being protected Deletion of Ed, Edd n Eddy's Big Picture Show WP:RECENT Wikipedia:Recentism 38 +1677 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Dwight User:Ahunt 13:05, 21 November 2017 (UTC) delete """no indication of here, no independent third party sources to establish notability. The prevalence of accounts all supporting """"keep"""" above while not providing any refs is a concern, see """ Deletion of Ron Dwight WP:GNG||WP:SPA||WP:NOTMEMORIAL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1678 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qantas Flight 72 User:Jclemens 16:58, 9 October 2008 (UTC) comment WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS + y argument == You're not helping your cause Deletion of Qantas Flight 72 WP:POINT Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +1679 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorothy of Oz (film) User:Ginsengbomb 01:51, 22 June 2010 (UTC) delete """After some thought and searching, I really can't find evidence in ''reliable'' sources that the animation equivalent of """"principal photography"""" (which I would consider actual animation work plus voice work with actors -- any work that brings some relative finality to the cast and crew) has actually commenced. All we have is a primary source indicating that it is """"in production,"""" with suspiciously recent (within the last few days) release of """"character sketches."""" This, in the absence of reliable sourcing that says otherwise, strongly suggests that the level of certainty looked for in with its principal photography guideline does not ''yet'' exist. That said, this topic is almost entirely certain to pass NFF with flying colors at some point in the future, possibly in the relatively near future. But, until then, my opinion is that it's a delete""" Deletion of Dorothy of Oz (film) WP:NFF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1680 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamic Vision Assessment for Transportation User:ZimZalaBim 02:14, 27 September 2006 (UTC) delete per nom. Wikipedia is also |not about |POV |vanity articles Deletion of Dynamic Vision Assessment for Transportation WP:NOT||WP:POV||WP:VAIN Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1681 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deputy Chairman of the NATO Military Committee User:SemiHypercube 21:28, 3 September 2018 (UTC) merge and protect the redirect to stop it from being recreated. Fails Deletion of Deputy Chairman of the NATO Military Committee WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1682 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XS Malarkey User:Mr 08:48, 21 September 2010 (UTC) keep """Well it certainly exists, as even a perfunctory search will show. And according to ''The Guardian'' http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2008/jun/07/comedy here, and ''The Independent'' http://www.independent.co.uk/travel/uk/south-east-england/the-travellers-guide-to-comedy-england-950023.html here, it's popular. AfD is not , so it boils down to this: should comedy clubs be in Wikipedia? Back to ''The Grauniad'', this time http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2007/sep/22/comedy here; """"Running a comedy club for a decade is quite an achievement in any circumstances, but outside London, on a shoestring, it really is something to be proud of."""" So, keep""" Deletion of XS Malarkey WP:CLEANUP Wikipedia:Cleanup 29 +1683 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Lyons User:GiantSnowman 14:23, 30 March 2009 (UTC) keep passes Deletion of Simon Lyons WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1684 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of anagrams User:Kinu 16:54, 26 August 2006 (UTC) delete intriguing as some of these might be, an indiscriminate collection of information Deletion of List of anagrams WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1685 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of video games rated E10+ User:Randomran 20:39, 21 December 2008 (UTC) delete as and #DIRECTORY Deletion of List of video games rated E10+ WP:SALAT||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists 51 +1686 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Glimmer Twins User:Masterpiece2000 13:21, 21 June 2008 (UTC) delete Fails . Unencyclopedic article Deletion of The Glimmer Twins WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1687 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Express Coach route 040 User:United 04:46, 29 July 2014 (UTC) delete Non-notable bus routes that carry ordinary people and travel the same roads everyday. Fails N, GNG, and maybe a loose interpretation of , as this is a routine event Deletion of National Express Coach route 040 WP:ROUTINE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1688 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doomcraft User:Celarnor 05:54, 23 May 2008 (UTC) delete Insufficient coverage in reliable sources. Fails both |FICT and |general notability Deletion of Doomcraft WP:FICT||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1689 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/To Court the King User:Skeletor3000 19:30, 22 January 2020 (UTC) comment I agree that the award nominations and Games of Tradition review are not enough on their own, for reasons outlined by Beemer69. I'm still curious about the cited Games Magazine article, but even if it meets , we still need multiple instances of significant coverage Deletion of To Court the King WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1690 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oobi at Work User:Bearian 18:30, 26 February 2011 (UTC) delete per - no regular editor has read this article and could state that it |meets the notability guidelines Deletion of Oobi at Work WP:SNOW||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +1691 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pension Volkmann User:Lankiveil 06:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC) keep """I believe a lot of the """"did a search, found nothing"""" results here are based upon looking for sources in English, rather than German, which one would expect the majority of the coverage to be in. While I don't think that Amiga (record label)|Amiga records released during the DDR era are really what #5 has in mind, I think there's enough coverage available in the German language (including on http://www.pensionvolkmann.de/presse.htm their website's press section) to think that there is something notable here""" Deletion of Pension Volkmann WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1692 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Avraham Nhamani User:Rlest 15:49, 23 July 2007 (UTC) delete This subject does not appear to be notable, as well as clearly failing the |verifiability policy. &mdash Deletion of Ben Avraham Nhamani WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1693 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holiday World & Splashin' Safari User:McDoobAU93 05:12, 5 May 2012 (UTC) keep Park is very notable, and article can easily be edited to remove any promotional jargon and |peacock words. I agree there are too many sources coming from the park's own website (although a number of those come from ''Amusement Today'', which is a |reliable source), but again those can be removed and replaced with independent sources. Is it in need of some TLC? Yes. Is it a candidate for deletion? Absolutely not Deletion of Holiday World & Splashin' Safari WP:PEACOCK||WP:RS Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +1694 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian D. Evans (2nd nomination) User:Bearian 01:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC) delete and |protect against continued creation. This is a |run of the mill business person, and obviously |has been an advertisement created at least twice by an SPA. We are not a |resume builder or LinkedIn. We are |not a web host. We are a private charity that builds an encyclopedia. My name is Brian, and I have over 1,157 friends on Facebook and 259 followers on Twitter - big whoop Deletion of Brian D. Evans (2nd nomination) WP:SALT||WP:MILL||WP:ADVERT||WP:NOTRESUME||WP:NOTWEBHOST Wikipedia:Protection policy 0 +1695 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fleshbeast User:FreeRangeFrog 01:05, 16 February 2009 (UTC) delete Smells like a bit of a hoax to me, that alleged film production company website is just weird. In any case, and no third-party sources to support notability Deletion of Fleshbeast WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1696 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ende International Airport User:Ringbark 21:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC) delete Extensive collection of airlines were edited, many of which do not/could not offer service to Erde, even if it existed. Suggest that the appropriate action is deletion under Deletion of Ende International Airport WP:SNOWBALL Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +1697 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The musical parody User:Beeblbrox 05:51, 24 July 2008 (UTC) delete Unsourced Deletion of The musical parody WP:BALLS Wikipedia:Complete bollocks 62 +1698 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fernanda Staniscuaski User:Darwinek 21:12, 6 April 2021 (UTC) delete per nom. quite yet Deletion of Fernanda Staniscuaski WP:NOTJUSTYET Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +1699 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puerto Rican Shits [[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 17:20, 4 March 2009 (UTC) delete per lack of |verifiability. For a second there, I thought this was what happens after eating a bunch of Puerto Rican cuisine|Puerto Rican food Deletion of Puerto Rican Shits WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1700 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samsung HL-R5688W User:SL93 00:53, 29 June 2017 (UTC) delete Clearly non-notable product. Fails Deletion of Samsung HL-R5688W WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1701 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ukrainian Revolution of 1918 User:Ev 08:08, 3 May 2008 (UTC) delete """per nomination as a Wikipedia:Content forking|content fork of """"Makhnovism"""" (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ukrainian_Revolution_of_1918&diff=209863365&oldid=209087941 compare the differences between the two entries) and then keep any ensuing redirect fully protected or simply |prevent re-creation""" Deletion of Ukrainian Revolution of 1918 WP:SALT Wikipedia:Protection policy 0 +1702 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Republican Party presidential primaries User:Schetm 08:38, 12 November 2020 (UTC) keep the nom failed to provide a -REASON|reason for the article to be deleted. It's well sourced and quite useful for the reader Deletion of 2024 Republican Party presidential primaries WP:DEL Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +1703 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Ohnesorge User:Angelo 10:39, 30 July 2008 (UTC) delete per nom. None of those sources are covering extensively in detail the subject, so they cannot be considered for Deletion of Michael Ohnesorge WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1704 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pile-on User:Jayden54 14:52, 24 December 2006 (UTC) delete I believe it's quite a common term, but I can't find any reliable sources, so delete per and unless some reliable sources can be found Deletion of Pile-on WP:V||WP:NEO Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1705 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stan Medalie User:CreativeNorth 14:46, 18 August 2020 (UTC) delete Also agree with the nom and the page itself is written like an advert under which means it fails Deletion of Stan Medalie WP:PROMOTION||WP:GNG Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1706 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The City (group) User:Doktorbuk 06:04, 20 August 2006 (UTC) keep as per above and Deletion of The City (group) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1707 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelus Church User:GRBerry 01:09, 11 September 2006 (UTC) delete """as |unverifiable. Excluding """"Wikipedia"""" from my google searches, I got no results. The article has no references to support any statement in it. Smells so strongly of hoax that I've marked it as such""" Deletion of Angelus Church WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1708 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohi (2nd nomination) User:Spirit 04:24, 14 April 2015 (UTC) keep per Schmidt. Article appears to be notable and its almost certainly going to be aired within a matter of weeks, so does not appear to be an issue Deletion of Mohi (2nd nomination) WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1709 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dungeons & Dragons dragon deities User:Rorshacma 16:48, 13 December 2019 (UTC) delete As with the rest of the species-specific deity lists, there are no reliable sources talking about the grouping as a whole that goes beyond basic plot or passing mentions - basically only Tiamat and Bahamut are potentially notable among the group, and are the only ones that really get any kind of coverage that could argued to be from reliable, secondary sources, and they already have their own articles. So, the grouping fails , and as only two of these entries are blue-linked, it does not really serve much of a purpose as a navigational tool. The only deities here that would warrant being merged into the main Dragon (Dungeons & Dragons) would be Tiamat & Bahamut, but since they already have separate articles, that isn't really necessary at this point Deletion of List of Dungeons & Dragons dragon deities WP:LISTN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1710 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InfoTrac User:MichaelQSchmidt 08:50, 15 May 2016 (UTC) keep per an errant deletion rational that does not argue non-notability, but simply complains that a |sourced article is unsourced. Addition sources are spoken of in detail on the Talk:InfoTrac|article's talk page and a little is encouraged before judgments Deletion of InfoTrac WP:UGLY||WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +1711 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pollution Check Bangladesh User:Mangoe 16:24, 5 September 2012 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Pollution Check Bangladesh WP:NOTESSAY Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1712 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Ferguson (photographer) User:SPat 04:25, 31 January 2010 (UTC) comment wasn't aware of when I made the page (and the article doesn't seem to satisfy the criteria). Still, I thought the Time (magazine)|Time article made it noteworthy enough Deletion of Adam Ferguson (photographer) WP:CREATIVE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1713 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yunis Al Astal User:Oren0 02:22, 9 May 2009 (UTC) keep """per : """"People who have held international, national or first-level sub-national political office, including members of a legislature and judges."""" The question to ask is whether the Hamas parliament counts for this guideline, but I think we throw out any semblance of if we claim that Hamas's parliament confers less notability than all 50 US state legislatures, members of which qualify under this guideline""" Deletion of Yunis Al Astal WP:POLITICIAN||WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1714 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line Theory User:PrimeHunter 20:03, 25 August 2007 (UTC) comment That was the creator who contested the prod. Is it time? Creator also accepted deletion on article in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Line_Theory&diff=153598941&oldid=153371299 (which I reverted since it doesn't belong there Deletion of Line Theory WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +1715 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connan Mockasin User:Sparklism 10:56, 1 October 2012 (UTC) keep """Subject has """"been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself"""", so meets #1. In addition to the sources already contained in the article, there are many sources available online. Examples of this are an http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/15716-forever-dolphin-love/ album review from Pitchfork Media and http://drownedinsound.com/releases/15407/reviews/4139980 another from Drowned in Sound""" Deletion of Connan Mockasin WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1716 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy Graf User:Jersyko 17:58, 6 October 2006 (UTC) keep I see no reason to refer to notability guidelines to prove that this article should be kept; this is a candidate for a major party for a national office, in any event. Though this article needs to be sourced, it's obviously |verifiable in |reliable sources, as the information at Arizona 8th congressional district election, 2006 is. It's relatively |NPOV. · Deletion of Randy Graf WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1717 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CK Morgan User:Lankiveil 11:39, 12 January 2014 (UTC) delete I don't see any evidence at all that this person meets any of the notability criteria Deletion of CK Morgan WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1718 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009–10 Gateshead F.C. season User:Number 10:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC) delete per failure Deletion of 2009–10 Gateshead F.C. season WP:NSEASON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1719 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Goodhart User:Epinoia 21:14, 26 August 2019 (UTC) delete """does not meet which requires """"a well-known and significant award or honor"""" and/or """"made a widely recognized contribution"""" - does not meet which requires """"significant roles"""" (parts in two minor reality shows are not that significant) - does not meet which requires """"significant coverage""""; of the sources provided, the Newcastle Chronicle, Capital FM, MTV, and OK-TV mentions are all run-of-the-mill press-release style promos of upcoming shows () - the BBC article gives her coverage, but she is not the main subject of the article and The Florida Post gives a mere one-line mention - not enough for notability, therefore, delete""" Deletion of Sarah Goodhart WP:ANYBIO||WP:NACTOR||WP:BASIC||WP:MILL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1720 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional beauty queens (2nd nomination) User:Aoba47 23:15, 12 August 2019 (UTC) delete per the nominator's rationale. It fails and , and seems to be rather trivial Deletion of List of fictional beauty queens (2nd nomination) WP:LIST||WP:FICTION Wikipedia:Lists 36 +1721 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheryl Rubenberg User:Xxanthippe 09:38, 13 August 2009 (UTC) comment """There appears to be a discrepancy between rof #1 which on these pages in the past has required hundreds of citations, and the interpretation of the editor above who finds that seven reviews satisfy uthor. It seems that it depends on how one interprets """"multiple""" Deletion of Cheryl Rubenberg WP:P||WP:A Wikipedia:Portal 50 +1722 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deltopia User:GauchoDude 16:16, 1 February 2017 (UTC) keep Not sure this AfD has been formatted correctly, {{Ping|Quidster4040}} as it's not appearing on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 February 1|daily log. In any event, if this is a true AfD nomination, I vote for keep. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Google search will turn up result after result of both local and national coverage. In a quick, 2 second search, I found sourcing from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/ap/article-2598223/Huge-California-party-spirals-violent-clash.html Daily Mail UK, http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/04/07/authorities-plan-sink-santa-barbaras-floatopia.html Fox News, http://cnn.com/2014/04/06/us/california-street-party-melee/ CNN, http://www.ibtimes.com/deltopia-party-devolves-massive-student-riot-santa-barbara-calif-100-arrested-1567979 International Business Times, http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2014/04/beach-party-riot-deltopia Complex magazine, http://gawker.com/southern-california-beach-party-ended-in-a-giant-street-1559641832 Gawker, http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/fla-officials-vow-floatopia-massive-beach-mess-article-1.2606275 NY Daily News, http://articles.latimes.com/2010/apr/07/local/la-me-floatopia7-2010apr07 Los Angeles Times, http://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/floatopia-trashed-miami-beach-just-like-everywhere-else-it-has-been-held-8396897 Miami New Times, and of course more local flavors such as http://www.independent.com/news/2009/apr/09/isla-vistas-floatopia-fiasco/ Santa Barbara Independent and http://www.keyt.com/news/local-news/isla-vista-beach-closures-announced-for-deltopia-event/65205684 KEYT. Easily passes Deletion of Deltopia WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1723 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Presutti User:Kubigula 15:13, 26 July 2007 (UTC) delete """per the """"tier two"""" option. This seems about the right balance - keep the starters and delete the prospects, benchwarmers and assistant coaches (unless, of course, they can be shown to meet """ Deletion of Jake Presutti WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1724 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international goals scored by Islam Slimani User:Spiderone 15:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC) delete for failure to meet Deletion of List of international goals scored by Islam Slimani WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1725 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hippo.com.au User:Lankiveil 12:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC) delete fails . It may also be necessary to salt, based on what the nominator has said Deletion of Hippo.com.au WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1726 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SoftwareFreedomKosovo User:Xymmax 03:41, 5 September 2009 (UTC) delete I'm sorry, but I can not see how this even comes close to meeting inclusion criteria. Such coverage as has been mentioned here is pretty clearly the type of routine coverage contemplated by . It isn't notable based on English language sources, and while I normally prefer to err in favor of inclusion in possible language-bias cases, the fact that this was the first year of the conference makes me feel pretty comforatable that Gertrude Stein|there is no there there Deletion of SoftwareFreedomKosovo WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1727 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crystal Clark User:Corpx 06:17, 11 August 2007 (UTC) delete per #NEWS - An appearance on a reality show != historic notability Deletion of Crystal Clark WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1728 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Little Mermaid III (2nd nomination) User:Liquidfinale 12:53, 25 October 2007 (UTC) comment I've only just noticed the previous AfD's for this title; each of which was clear as to the recommendation to delete. I should really have taken this to |speedy, but no matter Deletion of The Little Mermaid III (2nd nomination) WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +1729 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Maw User:Obina 09:15, 29 September 2007 (UTC) delete per . This is trivia about trivia. I did like the part about the parsec mistake - though that is not about the Maw. That mistake is notable since people do learn about science from popular media and people can belive parsec is a speed or light-year a time when popular cinema gets it wrong. That part should be merged somewhere - if it's not already in 10 star wars pages Deletion of The Maw WP:FICTION Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1730 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas and Friends (series 18) User:Lugnuts 17:19, 3 March 2012 (UTC) delete No sources provided by the creator, who should read and understand and Deletion of Thomas and Friends (series 18) WP:CRYSTAL||WP:BURDEN Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1731 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sage G. Rafferty User:Metropolitan90 09:08, 24 February 2008 (UTC) delete per . Completely unsourced article about apparently non-notable campaign staff member Deletion of Sage G. Rafferty WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1732 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-Land Puma FC User:Mattythewhite 14:56, 11 March 2012 (UTC) keep """Per . This says that """"All teams that have played in the national cup (or the national level of the league structure in countries where no cup exists) are assumed to meet criteria"""", which this team has, with the evidence supplied by Number 57""" Deletion of E-Land Puma FC WP:FOOTYN||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1733 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ger Hanley (footballer) User:GiantSnowman 14:22, 29 November 2010 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Ger Hanley (footballer) WP:ATHLETE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1734 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ÆON Bandaraya Melaka Shopping Centre User:Ad 15:36, 29 May 2014 (UTC) delete No evidence of notability. Subject appears to fail . Sources mostly are about other topics with the mall being incidental, often the location of a specific event, none of which are especially historic. A Google failed to yield anything that rings the notability bell Deletion of ÆON Bandaraya Melaka Shopping Centre WP:NGEOG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1735 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indigo Agriculture User:Originalmess 20:53, 1 August 2018 (UTC) keep sources: CNBC https://www.cnbc.com/video/2018/05/24/indigo-agriculture-ceo-seeks-revolution-in-agriculture.html interview with CEO, http://www.bostonherald.com/business/business_markets/2018/06/charlestown_lab_mining_microbes_to_help_feed_the_world (local news?) Boston Herald article, https://www.bizjournals.com/memphis/news/2017/12/06/agtech-firm-with-memphis-office-closes-203m.html local news (possible press release but I'm not sure), https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2017/09/26/indigo-agriculture-boston-newest-unicorn-startup/AhrZBNePKsEJkmPd47exlN/story.html Boston Globe article, http://www.wbur.org/bostonomix/2017/08/16/indigo-agriculture-drought-resistant-seeds local radio article, Digital Trends https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/plant-probiotics-could-accelerate-agriculture/ article, Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/maggiemcgrath/2018/06/27/the-25-most-innovative-agtech-startups-in-2018/#1c8062f42302 25 most innovative agtech startups, more http://charlestownbridge.com/2018/06/12/indigo-ag-in-hood-park-gets-major-state-job-creation-grant/ local news, 2016 Forbes http://fortune.com/2016/07/21/indigo-raised-100-million-funding-round/ article. (Only 1 or 2 of the sources I've listed are used in the article). None of these were marked as press releases by Google news/don't seem to be from blog contributors, but it seems to pass Deletion of Indigo Agriculture WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1736 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Merit (band) User:Bren 07:03, 12 June 2007 (UTC) comment """re the two deletes after the AfD relist: can I get an explaination of ''why'' this article fails ? Point one states """"It has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable."""" The article has now been modified to meet this criteria, so I'd just appreciate a little more on your reasoning. Thanks""" Deletion of Merit (band) WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1737 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sree Andalurkavu User:Allventon 17:12, 15 February 2009 (UTC) comment """http://tripatlas.com/Dharmadam is a mirror of a Wikipedia article, as noted by the disclaimer on the website: """"This article provided by Wikipedia."""" As a result, I do not believe the assertion on the website that the temple is """"a famous temple in Dharmadam ,during the festival of this Temple thousands of people used to make their devotions from different parts of Kannur and Calicut District"""" can be considered reliable. Thank you for showing that """"Sree"""" was not needed in a Google search; I didn't realize that. I could only find 5 other Ghits beside this website using the word """"Andalurkavu"""", 4 of which are restricted photos for me, and 1 a PDF document I am having trouble accessing for some reason. With regards to churches surviving AFD, I am afraid I wasn't aware of that precedent, so I am willing to dismiss my argument that the article should be deleted per WP:N. However, I believe that the lack of reliable sources to verify the subject of the article means that the article could be deleted per """ Deletion of Sree Andalurkavu WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1738 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiggleball [[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 00:55, 10 February 2009 (UTC) delete per lack of |verifiability as well as |crystalballery. We do not create Wikipedia articles to boost popularity of someone or something—that is called |spamming, which is not allowed. As also noted in Talk:Wiggleball, |Wikipedia is not your own web host to act as a repository and promotion vehicle of this |madeup sport. Perhaps if the sport garners significant coverage via |reliable secondary sources, then it may be suitable for inclusion in the future, but not now Deletion of Wiggleball WP:V||WP:CBALL||WP:SPAM||WP:NOTWEBHOST||WP:MADEUP||WP:RS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1739 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilli Sørensen User:Lukeno94 21:33, 25 March 2013 (UTC) comment we need a Danish-speaking editor whom can establish whether this guy meets or not. English searches turn up nothing, and although he has clearly been on the books at Aberdeen FChttp://www.afc.co.uk/articles/20100510/team-of-youngsters_2212158_2048217, he never played for them at a senior level, and hasn't received much coverage away from primary sources and routine things (including name dropping Deletion of Gilli Sørensen WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1740 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Load III User:E2eamon 15:57, 24 February 2011 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Load III WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1741 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anabond Limited [[User talk:98.215.48.213|talk]]) 11:56, 13 May 2008 (UTC) comment """The second reference in the article, as currently listed, has been deleted at its' source. Per , """"A company, corporation, organization, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of coverage in secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject. The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered."""" Are there enough references in depth in the article to justify notability? I don't see it, myself. Special:Contributions/98.215.48.213|98.215.48.213""" Deletion of Anabond Limited WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1742 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David E. Stern User:Bhaktivinode 12:47, 28 March 2008 (UTC) comment The article has been updated to include 2 additional references that are |reliable sources, per discussion above. Thanks Deletion of David E. Stern WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1743 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shubham Gupta User:Hobbes 14:13, 22 February 2015 (UTC) delete Not notable. Existing coverage is far too slender. Bad behavior by WP editors notwithstanding, if substantial coverage from independent |reliable sources can be found, am willing to reconsider Deletion of Shubham Gupta WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1744 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isa Bagci User:GiantSnowman 22:32, 25 May 2009 (UTC) delete per nom; fails Deletion of Isa Bagci WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1745 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tension & Trauma Releasing Exercises User:Bearian 22:20, 16 March 2019 (UTC) delete merely | spam Deletion of Tension & Trauma Releasing Exercises WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Spam 26 +1746 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IGGY Summer U User:Beeblbrox 15:15, 11 August 2008 (UTC) delete No ''signifigant'' coverage in |sources, not a |notable program Deletion of IGGY Summer U WP:RS||WP:N Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1747 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StickDeath User:Starblind 15:27, 19 November 2006 (UTC) delete per , and I don't see any reliable sources Deletion of StickDeath WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1748 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chlex User:Jreferee 07:31, 2 September 2007 (UTC) delete Importance/significance gets it past #A7. However, to get past |Notability, Chlex needs to have received significant coverage in Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources that are Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources|independent of the subject. The topic fails notability Deletion of Chlex WP:CSD||WP:N Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +1749 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/POLICE PISTOLCRAFT User:Pohta 17:38, 12 February 2010 (UTC) delete """Two book reviews have been added, but only one might qualify as http://www.officer.com/web/online/POSA/Police-Pistolcraft-Book-Review/30$48147 officer.com, the other is forum/blog post without a byline http://connect.lawofficer.com/group/firearmsinstructors/forum/topics/a-report-on-michael-e-contis. The editorial policy of officer.com is unclear as well (no """"about us"""" link on their page that I can find, only how you can advertise with them). They also take user-submitted news stories. This could well be one or be an advertorial""" Deletion of POLICE PISTOLCRAFT WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1750 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Chilton User:Hello32020 02:06, 16 October 2006 (UTC) delete Right now, it doesn't satisfy |notability guidelines Deletion of Don Chilton WP:NOTABLE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1751 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multimedia Esperanto User:Dhartung 13:51, 20 March 2008 (UTC) delete The http://web.archive.org/web/20060211223808/http://www.sensezero.org/ website (no CSS in Wayback, looks awful) doesn't seem to have been online for some time (only archived once). Haindl is certainly verifiable as an academic in the disciplinehttp://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/indices/a-tree/h/Haindl:Philipp.html. But it doesn't have much in the way of independent coverage, so pretty flatly fails / Deletion of Multimedia Esperanto WP:N||WP:SOFTWARE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1752 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Kolb User:Thryduulf 22:56, 9 October 2006 (UTC) delete """no evidence presented why he is more notable than any other college football player. The article effectively even says """"we wont know how good he is until this game in the future"""", which is crystal ballism (|Wikipedia is not a crystal ball""" Deletion of Kevin Kolb WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1753 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dare To Love Me User:Ward3001 23:57, 13 February 2009 (UTC) comment Sources have been added, but there still aren't any sources that filming has begun. Still fails Deletion of Dare To Love Me WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1754 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twenty One Pilots (album by Twenty One Pilots) User:Sergecross73 16:45, 8 March 2017 (UTC) comment Similar to what I said in the last AFD, I think it possible that this album be comparable to Bleach (Nirvana album), where it failed to chart in its initial release and would have probably failed an AFD had Wikipedia existed in 1990, but went on to be very notable and sales success after the band had a later album release that was massively successful and won all sorts of awards. It seems such a scenario is very possible with Twenty One Pilots, with their recent platinum album and multiple Grammy Award wins. However, |I'm not sure we're there yet. Is right now comparable to 1990's Nirvana or 1995's Nirvana? My main hang up is that we're still unable to find a single album review or RS that covers ''this album'' in detail, correct Deletion of Twenty One Pilots (album by Twenty One Pilots) WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +1755 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hillary Bus User:Bearian 16:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC) delete Yes, I endorsed the proposed deletion as non-controversial. It is |only vaguely related to the campaign, and |gives undue weight to one type of event. Four of |the sources are decent, but the others are social media. If truly needed, ''merge'' as suggested Deletion of Hillary Bus WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:UNDUE||WP:RS Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +1756 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DMS Derivatives Market Specialist User:Johnuniq 10:44, 13 June 2009 (UTC) delete We have articles for certification programs like Microsoft Certified Professional, because it is an extremely widely-discussed course. I don't know of anything other than to gauge whether this course is notable, and I believe it fails that test. The references establish that there is a course, and that there are sites that want to sell the course to you. However, it has be |notable for an encyclopedic article. A similiar article is Macquarie Global Leadership Program which is also up for AFD Deletion of DMS Derivatives Market Specialist WP:GNG||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1757 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tombola (raffle) User:Bejnar 05:31, 9 December 2015 (UTC) merge to Bingo if we are talking about the content of the Italian article. The UK raffle lacks coverage and hence lacks notability, fails Deletion of Tombola (raffle) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1758 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohini Bhairav User:onel5969 21:00, 16 December 2020 (UTC) delete certainly doesn't pass Deletion of Mohini Bhairav WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1759 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juli Briskman User:TJRC 00:17, 7 November 2019 (UTC) delete Non-notable, not even for the one event. Do not redirect to NANA Development Corporation; the comment in that article is . I'd remove it, but not while this is under discussion. See also Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 November 29#Juli Briskman|this RFD from 2017 Deletion of Juli Briskman WP:COATRACK Wikipedia:Coatrack articles 47 +1760 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlon Licona User:Kosack 17:45, 23 November 2018 (UTC) delete fails having never played in a fully professional league or a senior international fixture and does not have significant independent coverage to meet Deletion of Marlon Licona WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1761 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real Girls Media User:MuffledThud 02:25, 24 March 2009 (UTC) keep 2 out of 9 references were press releases. I have now removed one, which leaves independent coverage in seven articles by third party |reliable sources, including the NYT and the SF Chronicle. It's a notable company Deletion of Real Girls Media WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1762 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Yusuf (2nd nomination) User:onel5969 17:40, 13 December 2020 (UTC) delete """does not meet , and as pointed out by HandsomeBoy, """"unelected statewide apointees are not automatically deemed notable""" Deletion of Ahmed Yusuf (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1763 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruby Zoo User:B 10:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC) delete By , international tours only establish notability if they are reported in |reliable sources. None are given however. Albums seem to be self-released, at least I could not find any information to the contrary Deletion of Ruby Zoo WP:MUSIC||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1764 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X-COM: UFO Defense (Russian novel) User:Someone 01:14, 3 October 2009 (UTC) delete I can find nothing resembling a |reliable source for this, isn't satisfied let alone . No prejudice against reinstatement if it can be sources, but I can't support a merge as there's no sources to verify it, it's not clear if this is even an ordinary novel or a work of fan fiction, if it's the latter then there would be zero need to mention it unless it was notable Deletion of X-COM: UFO Defense (Russian novel) WP:RS||WP:V||WP:N Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1765 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fenrir (Dungeons & Dragons) User:Hello32020 20:41, 14 September 2006 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Fenrir (Dungeons & Dragons) WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +1766 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nico Cotton User:GiantSnowman 09:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Nico Cotton WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1767 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlton Players, Birkenhead (2nd nomination) User:Stifle 11:16, 5 September 2008 (UTC) delete WP:CITE|Citations from |reliable sources are required by the |verifiability policy but don't appear to be present Deletion of Carlton Players, Birkenhead (2nd nomination) WP:RS||WP:V Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1768 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ori (Stargate) User:Daranios 20:46, 17 July 2020 (UTC) keep The nominator found screenrant as one source, but was there also a search in Google Scholar? So far I have found two in-depth sources there: https://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=cFQicvXd5bwC&oi=fnd&pg=PA267&dq=ori+stargate&ots=xo6loT9Brz&sig=dhSNJ_lcADmtgQGJlF1rr8_XaQw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=ori&f=false The Essential Science Fiction Television Reader has a chapter comparing the Ori and the Ancients (Stargate)|Ancients; https://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=0KA83tzzEBkC&oi=fnd&pg=PA9&dq=ori+stargate&ots=cpT33c-grs&sig=Q-2zew9jN7koHugj0Yxvd4-xgBU&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=ori&f=false The Emancipation of the Soul analyses the metaphorical significance of the Ori as a science-fiction trope and more. These three together should satisfy . Then https://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=ZH701fKb2dgC&oi=fnd&pg=PR6&dq=ori+stargate&ots=Rb-3SRKO8p&sig=CQ37KDG2ElBP8oC6_j8dX1ThDc8&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=ori&f=false Science Fiction Experiences comments on the Ori from the view-point of the TV watcher. And there are a number of shorter appearances in secondary sources, e.g. https://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=lMqoAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA67&dq=ori+stargate&ots=Plnvq3OYZ-&sig=iu6XjWUjWf_-LyGTezcqg0fze0Q&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=ori&f=false, https://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=RbJ_CgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=ori+stargate&ots=dTYtUocuNP&sig=ksBc4-j1SwBYvwoneYUBieMrdzA&redir_esc=y#v=snippet&q=ori&f=false, https://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=shHxWHqkG5IC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=ori+stargate&ots=9kEDD-T0kt&sig=Lj_smBf23dPPgMsqLEgqH0NV_fw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=ori&f=false Deletion of Ori (Stargate) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1769 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neuralink User:Bilorv 19:09, 8 October 2018 (UTC) keep """I've been mulling this one over for a few days but I'm decided against a merge. I don't know whether Jytdog has me in mind when referring to """"keeping out the typical Musk hype"""" and """"Musk's fanbase in Wikipedia"""" but it should be noted that despite a strong personal dislike of Musk, I stand by my position in Talk:Neuralink/Archive_1#Musk's_timeframes|a lengthy argument I had with Jytdog in April 2017, as the commentary about the timeframes Musk claims (which included criticism) fall under CRYSTALBALL's """"It ''is'' appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced"""". This content would make the article a bit more substantial if included. SpinningSpark also notes the presence of sources around Neuralink which are sufficient for GNG (even discounting the examples of theirs which are unreliable""" Deletion of Neuralink WP:CRYSTALBALL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1770 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RailsBricks User:Lesser 19:26, 23 August 2014 (UTC) delete mdash;The rubygems site does not contribute to notability, nor does the single sentence + link at rubynews. That leaves us with one podcast, and railsbricks was only one topic among six discussed. There's just not enough out there in the way of to warrant an article. If uptake continues and coverage starts to accrue, the article can be recreated Deletion of RailsBricks WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1771 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Rohingya villages User:Spiderone 23:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC) delete original research and fails anyway Deletion of List of Rohingya villages WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1772 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EliteXC: Showdown User:TreyGeek 01:01, 15 April 2012 (UTC) delete The event never happened and the article fails to explain how a non-occurring event is notable. Seems to be a perfect example of why event article should not be created in advance of the event as per Deletion of EliteXC: Showdown WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1773 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China Power New Energy Development Company Limited User:In 08:15, 10 October 2016 (UTC) keep ping|KGirlTrucker81}} if First Solar is notable with 2MW capacity, and it is, look at the size of the article, why is their Chinese partner CPNED with 1000x (2GW) the installed capacity not notable? Likewise it is but the sources are primarily in Chinese. Which is acceptable under en.wp , allowing for the article to be expanded. All the Big 5 China gencos have clean-green babies, this is the clean-green baby of Big 5 CPID, note the chairperson is the only daughter of former Chinese Premier Li Peng Deletion of China Power New Energy Development Company Limited WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1774 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Messed Up User:Herostratus 14:08, 27 December 2006 (UTC) delete Non-notable webcomic, no third-party citations included or likely available, therefore fails notability and Deletion of Messed Up WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1775 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DVD single User:Northamerica1000 12:27, 10 June 2016 (UTC) keep or '''Merge''' to Music single, which presently has no content about this |verified aspect of music singles. The Recording Industry Association of America has certified some DVD singles as platinum and gold. Some coverage exists, but it will take time to sort out content about the format itself and sources about artist releases on DVD singles. Some sources about the former are listed below Deletion of DVD single WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1776 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sylloc Server User:Gary 20:13, 27 April 2008 (UTC) delete Does not appear notable enough to deserve its own article, per . I could not find any |reliable sources that covers the subject Deletion of Sylloc Server WP:N||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1777 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hänsel und Gretel (John Pritchard recording) User:4meter4 01:22, 20 September 2019 (UTC) comment The criteria in ikiProject Classical music/Guidelines#Notability of recordings is from an essay by a WikiProject and does not carry the broad support of wikipedia policy. Further, this guideline section is currently being considered for removal for concerns, as well as its conflict with the policy at Deletion of Hänsel und Gretel (John Pritchard recording) WP:W||WP:NPOV||WP:NALBUM Help:Watchlist 57 +1778 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoot Rumpus User:Siva1979 13:25, 29 September 2007 (UTC) delete The lack of |verified content is a major concern here. A quick http://www.google.com.sg/search?as_q=&hl=en&num=100&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=Zoot+Rumpus&as_oq=&as_eq=wikipedia&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&as_rights=&safe=image google search shows up no |reliable hits for this subject. Moreover, this article is in violation of as well. --|S Deletion of Zoot Rumpus WP:V||WP:RS||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:ESP Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1779 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viulen Ayvazyan User:Sir 17:33, 25 October 2012 (UTC) delete per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or a senior national team, nor has he received significant coverage, meaning the article fails and Deletion of Viulen Ayvazyan WP:NSPORT||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1780 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enrique's 10th Studio Album User:Ansh666 01:34, 31 August 2013 (UTC) delete classic case Deletion of Enrique's 10th Studio Album WP:HAMMER Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law 11 +1781 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Myers User:Lemongirl942 00:01, 31 August 2016 (UTC) delete This is way too soon. The NYDailyNews is the best source we can get. The Newsday is a local source and a trivial mention talking about a rescheduling of a concern - there's hardly anything about the subject itself. The MTV source mentioned by {{u|K.e.coffman}} is a source and essentially a directory listing (See disclaimer below {{tq|This site contains content from artists, fans, and writers from around the internet in it's natural form. Such content is not representative of Viacom Media Networks.}}. Overall, this is just and a clear delete. I see this essentially as a promotional page for an upcoming artist Deletion of King Myers WP:USERGENERATED||WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1782 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Brown (politician) User:Rhododendrites 00:39, 17 December 2014 (UTC) keep Between what's cited and a cursory gsearch I'm seeing sufficient/significant coverage to satisfy . --&mdash Deletion of Sarah Brown (politician) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1783 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Mues User:Hawkeye7 07:11, 2 August 2019 (UTC) delete but no objection to redirecting to 2020 United States Senate election in Montana. How many times do we have to go through this? says a politician has to ''get elected'' before they qualify for an article Deletion of John Mues WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1784 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Brother 10 (US) User:Amarrg 08:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Big Brother 10 (US) WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1785 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russ Canzler User:Ohnoitsjamie 18:07, 5 October 2009 (UTC) delete Doesn't meet requirements Deletion of Russ Canzler WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1786 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodney Morison (2nd nomination) User:Atmoz 18:53, 19 May 2011 (UTC) delete unreferenced bio. obits in general don't satisfy . no other sources found. but no objection to recreation if someone finds a reliable source. fails Deletion of Rodney Morison (2nd nomination) WP:RS||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1787 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New York Marriott Marquis User:Oakshade 14:13, 7 July 2007 (UTC) keep """Per above. Very notable location, size and hotel company. NYT refs alone above to boot. The nom's """"A big concrete slab of a hotel"""" is a very obvious example of """ Deletion of New York Marriott Marquis WP:IDONTLIKEIT Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +1788 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikey Gray User:ChrisTheDude 07:20, 16 June 2008 (UTC) delete Definitely doesn't meet requirements Deletion of Mikey Gray WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1789 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilliver User:Blue520 20:50, 4 April 2006 (UTC) delete is a neologism , with out verification of its use the page is just an attack page Deletion of Gilliver WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +1790 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Menachem Creditor (2nd nomination) User:Bearian 20:39, 12 May 2010 (UTC) keep per , although even more |sources would be helpful for a BLP Deletion of Menachem Creditor (2nd nomination) WP:HEY||WP:RS Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard 85 +1791 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Hippocratic Registry User:Power 12:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC) comment The real issue here, is that some doctors don't like the doctors' general Charter, but wish to revert to the original Hippocratic Oath, which inter alia, does not allow assisted suicide or abortion. These are the life and death issues (literally) at stake here. The article is not specific and blunt enough on this, I suspect due to issues. Bottom line is though, that the topic is important, existential, relevant - in short, encyclopaedic - and so is articles on national organizations of physicians that trumphet pro/con such principles . Keep or delete votes here, will mostly be based on a perception if guidelines are some sort of policy, of if they merely are ''guidelines'', that need not rigorously be complied with Deletion of American Hippocratic Registry WP:COI||WP:N Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +1792 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julien david User:Usrnme 12:31, 7 January 2009 (UTC) delete per nom. Also probably points 4 and 5 Deletion of Julien david WP:SOAP Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1793 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marsaskala F.C. User:apple20674 14:35, 6 April 2021 (UTC) keep Passes , shown by participation in the Maltese FA Trophy here: https://www.mfa.com.mt/en/cups-competitions/cupscompetitions/bycategory/1/publish_date/asc/10/1/the--fa-trophy.htm?round=1&s=11 Deletion of Marsaskala F.C. WP:FOOTYN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1794 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alek Skarlatos User:Coolabahapple 16:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC) comment """probably nothing useful:)), funny when afds become longer then the article concerned, """"The lowest grade, which these gentlemen were awarded, is very common and cannot possibly be said to confer inherent notability"""" - very common??, I don't have one, does anyone else involved in this discussion?, according to the wikiarticle Legion of Honour, as of 2010 there has only been about 100,000 issued, if we can have thousands of articles about academy award winners and sports people (""""competed at the modern Olympic Games"""" is notable - 1000s compete at each Olympics eg. over 10,000 at 2012 Summer Olympics|London) why can't recipients of this honor (and obes, mbes as well:)) have an article (and no, I am not volunteering to do them:))? Also, is the comment relevant as this person is receiving the award as a civilian? If this article is redirected, won't there arise balance/undue weight issues in the main article? """"it's only a WP:BLP1E situation"""" which states """"We should generally avoid having an article on a person when each of three conditions is met"""" (my emphasis) can someone please show where this is the case here as I have not been convinced by the 'deleters""" Deletion of Alek Skarlatos WP:NOLYMPICS||WP:SOLDIER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1795 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjou Soares User:Mar4d 22:40, 28 October 2017 (UTC) delete fails . Note that he was CEO of a Diocese, not the Bishop. We keep Bishops even as stubs, with a diocesan administrator, we need sources. I ran some news archive searches, and failed to find anything Deletion of Anjou Soares WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1796 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebeca Omordia User:Laurenlinn 15:49, 12 January 2013 (UTC) delete I agree that this page appears to be . The references listed for the artist's achievements are weak and are not high quality secondary sources per WP policy, but rather event and programme listings. I might even venture to say Deletion of Rebeca Omordia WP:TOOSOON||WP:NPF Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +1797 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solage (poetry) User:Dhartung 04:03, 29 May 2008 (UTC) delete per |Wikipedia is not for things made up at a poetry slam one day. Mr. Semmens, as well, appears unnotable -- almost all of the references to him are for an incident where he owned a domain name similar to one chosen by David Cameron Deletion of Solage (poetry) WP:NFT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +1798 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean C. Ewing User:Bearcat 16:16, 25 July 2021 (UTC) delete """Mebane NC is not a global city for the purposes of securing the """"inherent"""" notability of its municipal councillors, but this article neither suggests that he has any preexisting notability for other reasons (e.g. having previously held a more notable political office) nor demonstrates the depth of |reliable source coverage about him that it would take to deem him a special case of significantly greater notability than the norm for smalltown municipal councillors""" Deletion of Sean C. Ewing WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1799 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan W. Gates User:Dhartung 18:03, 19 September 2007 (UTC) delete No attribution of notability to independent sources; fails Deletion of Ryan W. Gates WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1800 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter McFadden User:Ejgreen77 01:11, 17 June 2014 (UTC) keep as a straight-up pass. Stats linked to in the article confirm that McFadden played in the NFL Deletion of Walter McFadden WP:NGRIDIRON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1801 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob advanced User:Sycthos 02:44, 15 January 2006 (UTC) delete as this is an article of |vanity Deletion of Bob advanced WP:VAIN Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +1802 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sealand War of Independence User:Abductive 01:52, 11 January 2010 (UTC) delete this is and a . Sources are a blog, a court record (a primary source), and an article in Wired that might be appropriate for the main article, but not strong enough to support this page Deletion of Sealand War of Independence WP:SYNTHESIS||WP:CFORK Wikipedia:No original research 12 +1803 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenn Dolari (2nd nomination) User:Bucketsofg 19:21, 20 January 2007 (UTC) delete as failing unless we have multiple independent sources Deletion of Jenn Dolari (2nd nomination) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1804 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Demon's Boy User:Gene93k 22:34, 15 January 2010 (UTC) delete per nom. I couldn't find any trace of this book outside Wikipedia and its mirrors either. Fails Deletion of The Demon's Boy WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1805 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Bittner User:Stifle 02:02, 30 December 2005 (UTC) delete Currently no evidence of passing Deletion of Eric Bittner WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1806 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle T. Hayes User:Richwales 04:58, 1 August 2011 (UTC) merge to Nine Eleven Finding Answers Foundation. No notability of this person per . Nothing useful found in a Google search Deletion of Michelle T. Hayes WP:PEOPLE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1807 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Tse (2nd nomination) User:Kosm1fent 08:56, 9 September 2012 (UTC) keep seems to pass , but also seems to fail . And despite what T. Canens says, GNG and NFOOTY are '''not''' independent from each other, as standalone articles are required to meet GNG (#Applicable policies and guidelines). Participation in a fully professional league is a indication that maybe there is enough coverage on the player to satisfy GNG, but there could be none of value. In this case, there is no indication that the player's single participation in a fully pro league made him more notable than before. However, I'm willing to assume good faith on T. Canens' part that there is good-quality coverage on him in reliable Chinese sources, mostly because I can't speak or read or understand any Asian language and I'm not willing to start now. &ndash Deletion of Sean Tse (2nd nomination) WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1808 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Balmer User:Bearian 20:00, 23 September 2014 (UTC) delete a |run of the mill local radio evangelist Deletion of Mark Balmer WP:MILL Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill 32 +1809 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Hassan(united states) User:RightCowLeftCoast 19:05, 2 April 2013 (UTC) merge to United States presidential election, 2012; subject of this AfD has received |significant coverage from multiple non-primary |reliable sources, as indicated in http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Abdul+Hassan%28united+states%29%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1#hl=en&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Abdul+Hassan%22+President+candidate&oq=%22Abdul+Hassan%22+President+candidate&gs_l=serp.3...165161.166921.4.167051.12.12.0.0.0.0.276.2009.0j7j4.11.0...0.0...1c.1.8.psy-ab.DPXIP0bHT8Y&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.44697112,d.b2I&fp=2e744af069b2e730&biw=1034&bih=751 this search. That being said, the subject has received most of that coverage related to the subject of the article United States presidential election, 2012 and therefore falls under . As the subject is primarily notable due to a single event or series of event that falls within the scope of the suggested article, a redirect is in order if we are to follow BLP1E. Furthermore, also informs us that a redirect is the proper outcome of this type of AfD Deletion of Abdul Hassan(united states) WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:BLP1E||WP:POLOUTCOMES Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1810 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data Control & Systems User:AllyD 06:22, 8 June 2013 (UTC) delete """The section on """"Ownership History"""" indicates the firm went through a number of names in a short period, between UUnet and a final merge into Econet Wireless, but nothing is found to indicate its individual notability per . A viewpoint on :Talk:Data Control & Systems is well worth reading: the convoluting history of early ISPs is interesting (and probably under-documented) especially in that country's socio-political context, but broadening or repurposing this article in that direction would be |original research""" Deletion of Data Control & Systems :WP:CORPDEPTH||:WP:NOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1811 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KO·MO·RE·BI User:Kunzite 02:52, 21 August 2006 (UTC) keep Release info exists on site; artist is notable per But, let's get rid of the ALL CAPS NAMES Deletion of KO·MO·RE·BI WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1812 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annie jr User:SlamDiego 13:02, 11 August 2009 (UTC) delete I see no evidence of sufficient |“notability” for a separate article. Possibly Annie (musical)|the article on the original musical should make some reference to this adaptation Deletion of Annie jr WP:NOTE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1813 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Illusive Entertainment User:Tarret 23:30, 18 September 2006 (UTC) delete Non-notable and fails Deletion of Illusive Entertainment WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1814 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilmington Montessori School User:Corvus 02:27, 3 February 2008 (UTC) delete """Does not meet as it does not appear to have """"received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject"""" - none are cited in the article and a Google search http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=Wilmington+Montessori+School&btnG=Search&meta= provides no references. The only claim to notability is that one of its teachers was awarded a prestigious award, but this has no bearing as |notability is not inherited - the teacher probably isn't notable enough for an article, so why would this somehow make the school notable? As a side note, I don't see anything which suggests that""" Deletion of Wilmington Montessori School WP:N||WP:ITSA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1815 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human Instrumentality Project User:Collectonian 01:40, 30 December 2009 (UTC) delete Wikipedia is for the publication of someone's personal opinions and self-research. This is a non-notable fictional concept from the Neon Genesis Evangelion franchise. The one claimed source buried in the article might be usable elsewhere, but there is nothing in this article to salvage for merging or redirecting Deletion of Human Instrumentality Project WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1816 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Alipour Rahmati [[User talk:Ravenswing|''' '' Ravenswing '' ''']] 10:11, 10 September 2014 (UTC) keep Another ill-considered nomination from this nom, who's racking up a lot of bad AfDs in recent days -- this is the sixth I've found, so far. Obvious pass on Deletion of Mohammad Alipour Rahmati WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1817 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kermit Roosevelt III (2nd nomination) User:Russ 23:14, 16 August 2020 (UTC) comment Some more reviews towards a likely case. Popular books: https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-1-941393-30-7https://aux.avclub.com/kermit-roosevelt-in-the-shadow-of-the-law-1798200803https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/kermit-roosevelt/allegiance-roosevelt/https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/kermit-roosevelt/in-the-shadow-of-the-law/?page=76https://www.jstor.org/stable/40041505https://www.jstor.org/stable/40042023. Legal books: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27558027 Deletion of Kermit Roosevelt III (2nd nomination) WP:NAUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1818 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Bowes User:Papaursa 17:54, 6 July 2014 (UTC) delete Autobiography about a boxer who doesn't come close to meeting Deletion of Philip Bowes WP:NBOX Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1819 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Barack Obama visit to India User:Johnsemlak 12:43, 4 July 2011 (UTC) keep Disclaimer--I'm the author of hte article. As stated in the article's lead, during hte trip Obama addressed a joint session of the Indian Parliament, which I believe is the 4th time that's happened since 2000. He publicly endorsed India to be a permanent member of the UN Security Council. does not apply, as this is not 'routine'. But beyond that, I'll go straight to the meat of the reason--I can'f possibly see how someone could say 2011 royal tour of Canada (currently on it's way to an overwhelming consensus to keep) is worth an article adn this isn't. I'm not normally a fan of this kind of argument; I myself supported the deletion of the Royal tour of Canada but opposed referring to the deletion of Barack Obama's visit to India as an argument. However, I the difference in notability between the two events is very stark in my eyes. Also, in the deletion discussion of the royal tour, several editors expressed support of an article on Obama's visit to India. Thus, I think it's possible that Wikipedia:Consensus can change|consensus has changed Deletion of 2010 Barack Obama visit to India WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1820 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Levi Johnston User:S 00:39, 10 May 2009 (UTC) delete This unremarkable individual has received a certain amount of attention from the more immature and gossipy rags as a result of his tenuous connection with Sarah Palin, and thus his existence and status are |verifiable from |reliable sources. Therefore his name is a plausible search term, and should not be a redlink. However, he is not |notable enough for his own article because |notability is not inherited. Thus, a redirect is the only option consistent with policy and guidelines.The reason I think the article's previous content and history should be deleted is because it is not encyclopaedic in nature and is in conflict with the guidelines and policies I cited a moment ago Deletion of Levi Johnston WP:V||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:INHERITED Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1821 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seph Lawless (2nd nomination) User:Jacobssteph 01:22, 21 November 2017 (UTC) delete """Based on the criteria set out in he does not meet any of the 4 requirements of notability for a Creative Person, or the criteria generally. There is no evidence that in the professional photography community he has significant recognition or reputation. He has not won minor or major awards (let alone multiple awards). He has not developed a new technique, style or subject matter (what he does, urban_exploration photography is very commonplace and he does not do it particularly well or uniquely). He has not generated a body of work that has generated an INDEPENDENT and notable work (i.e. he has not been the subject of a tv series, no books have been written about him that he did not write himself, or the like). His work is not part of any gallery permanent collections (minor or major galleries), reached the level of """"significant monument"""", or been the subject or part of a significant exhibition. Simply being in the news does not make one notable for the purposes of a wikipedia entry. To be notable, they must be significant and noteworthy. An example of a photographer who is significant and is included in wikipedia would be Edward_Burtynsky (major international exhibitions, groundbreaking body of work, deemed significant by his peers, series of movies made about him, etc""" Deletion of Seph Lawless (2nd nomination) WP:CREATIVE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1822 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X-net (2nd nomination) User:Syrthiss 16:17, 9 December 2005 (UTC) delete Based on the comments on the previous one, I am agreeing this looks like different content. Wikipedia is |not a crystal ball, and while some pre-release software is notable (ie Windows Vista)...this doesn't appear to be Deletion of X-net (2nd nomination) WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1823 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WHAV User:Mrschimpf 03:55, 11 July 2016 (UTC) keep Well meets easily Deletion of WHAV WP:BROADCAST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1824 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nasalevtsi: Poor vs. Rich User:MichaelQSchmidt 20:06, 26 July 2015 (UTC) delete per (still) being |TOO SOON. It is not at surprising that an incomplete, non-English, Bulgarian film has no English language coverage, but it does have some Bulgarian-language http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3687952/literature coverage. Allow undeletion once we have release and MORE actual coverage Deletion of Nasalevtsi: Poor vs. Rich WP:NYF Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +1825 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suphat Onthong User:GiantSnowman 11:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC) delete per nom; non-notable player who fails Deletion of Suphat Onthong WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1826 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of item numbers in Indian cinema (2nd nomination) User:power 00:59, 4 December 2017 (UTC) delete """as per nom. A containing blue-linked ''songs'' (not movies) probably can be constructed, and that would be fine to keep. However, there are only about 10 blue-linked songs (including Phir Milenge Chalte Chalte and Kajra Re), but some (Lazy Lamhe) aren't described as """"item numbers"""" on the article page""" Deletion of List of item numbers in Indian cinema (2nd nomination) WP:SAL Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists 51 +1827 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Air Cadet squadrons in Canada User:ImperatorExercitus 21:03, 3 August 2009 (UTC) delete per , criteria 1. Cheers Deletion of List of Air Cadet squadrons in Canada WP:NOTYELLOW Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1828 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jun Fukuyama User:KrebMarkt 10:16, 18 August 2009 (UTC) keep Jun Fukuyama has won the first http://www.seiyuawards.jp/200812/11182724.php Seiyu Awards in Best Actor in leading role. I'm aware that wikipedia has |bias issue and will discount that prize as an outlander non notable non reliable prize for Japanese seiyu but still i tried. I agree that this article would be way better with some sources thought like that one to the Seiyu Awards Deletion of Jun Fukuyama WP:BIAS Wikipedia:Systemic bias 83 +1829 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Rovics User:MCB 22:55, 22 January 2006 (UTC) keep bad faith nom, . After 10 or more of these it is time to block nominator for disruption of Wikipedia Deletion of David Rovics WP:POINT Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +1830 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frankie Adams User:MSJapan 00:27, 27 March 2006 (UTC) delete nn vanity article. Meets none of the requirements for , particularly wrt athletics Deletion of Frankie Adams WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1831 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hard Hat Brotherhood User:Krimpet 03:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC) delete per and Deletion of Hard Hat Brotherhood WP:ORG||WP:COI Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1832 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BM Nekutāru User:Goodraise 21:58, 15 April 2009 (UTC) delete per Deletion of BM Nekutāru WP:NOTPLOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1833 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wunderlist User:scope_creep 15:50, 31 August 2013 (UTC) delete Startup company|Startup only recently created. Fails . Not much else to say Deletion of Wunderlist WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1834 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill 165 User:Bearcat 22:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC) delete """Every piece of legislation that exists in every jurisdiction that passes legislation is not automatically a suitable article topic; |reliable sourcing must be present to ''show'' that the topic is noteworthy. Creator also needs to be aware that pieces of legislation are titled with their ''short form name'', not their bill number — every single state or province in North America will have its own completely different """"Bill 165"""" within the life of its current legislature, another completely different """"Bill 165"""" several years ago during the life of its ''previous'' legislature, and then another completely different """"Bill 165"""" a few years into the future after the next election resets the bill numbering ''again""" Deletion of Bill 165 WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1835 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alison Rogers User:Pburka 22:53, 12 August 2020 (UTC) comment Also curious to see a rationale. At least one of her books attracted a number of reviews (''https://therealdeal.com/issues_articles/diary-of-a-real-estate-rookie-a-fresh-look-from-the-front/ Real Deal'', ''https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-1-4277-5465-3 Publishers Weekly'', ''https://observer.com/2007/06/a-realestate-newbie-reports-back-from-the-front/ New York Observer'') so she might pass #3 Deletion of Alison Rogers WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1836 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Home Sweet Home (2017 video game) User:The1337gamer 20:00, 25 January 2017 (UTC) delete Fails . As already pointed out, no hits from reliable video game source search Deletion of Home Sweet Home (2017 video game) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1837 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Szczuczyn pogrom User:E 13:49, 5 December 2017 (UTC) keep Article can be cleaned up using massive number of s provided by Icewhiz Deletion of Szczuczyn pogrom WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1838 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Whitsitt User:Inter 01:47, 27 February 2017 (UTC) comment does the Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup count as a professional competition? If so the subject would pass as per multiple references in the article state that he has appeared in that competition Deletion of Brad Whitsitt WP:NFOOTY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1839 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supreme Grand Master Azrael User:Protonk 04:25, 21 September 2008 (UTC) delete as |original research and |plot recapitulation of a non-notable fictional subject. You can add a redirect or not. It doesn't seem to be a likely search term, but you might as well. If you '''do''' redirect, the target should be to Space Marines (Warhammer 40,000), not Warhammer 40,000 Deletion of Supreme Grand Master Azrael WP:OR||WP:PLOT Wikipedia:No original research 12 +1840 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krishna Nagar, Delhi User:The 23:54, 4 April 2012 (UTC) merge although I'm not 100% sure of the target; East Delhi would be valid, but is there a lower-level subregion with a valid page? While, as Lugnuts points out, towns, communities, and so-on are universially kept per Wikipedia's remit as a gazeteer and , Krishna Nagar isn't one of those; it a neighborhood. http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Krishna+Nagar,+Delhi&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hl=en&sa=N&tab=wl Google Map - this is not an indpendent community, and as such, IMHO, should be merged and redirected to the actual community that it is a part of, as it does not meet Deletion of Krishna Nagar, Delhi WP:OUTCOMES||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +1841 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Andrew Wilson User:Icewhiz 12:39, 12 March 2019 (UTC) delete Whether 2nd-tier Danish 1st Division (beneath Danish Superliga) possibly meets NFOOTY (not in current list) is immaterial, as this subject does not meet and NFOOTY merely creates a presumption of GNG. Per my BEFORE all we have is a signing announcement (which is mainly PR flap from the club as well) as a few brief mentions in match reports in possibly non-reliable sources. As we are clearly lacking '''significant coverage''' in '''|reliable sources''' that are '''ndependent sources|independent of the subject''' - subject simply does not have SIGCOV Deletion of Jordan Andrew Wilson WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE||WP:I||WP:reliable sources Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1842 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince of Persia 4 User:Jauerback 15:31, 26 October 2007 (UTC) delete it's not even announced. Until then, this article is pure Deletion of Prince of Persia 4 WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1843 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colonel Tennis Complex User:Lizard 17:08, 8 December 2017 (UTC) merge with Nicholls State Colonels#Men's tennis. References seem to be . What little info there is can easily fit in a section of another article Deletion of Colonel Tennis Complex WP:ROUTINE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1844 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry David Evans User:Papaursa 16:01, 23 February 2019 (UTC) delete There are over 3000 active IMs, which is why I suspect the Chess project didn't say it was enough to show notability. He lacks the significant independent coverage to meet Deletion of Larry David Evans WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1845 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tai Lopez User:Narky 11:21, 11 January 2018 (UTC) delete Four of the five sources are self-published or minor mentions. Only the ''Vice'' one is independent, but it isn't enough to establish notability (which requires multiple sources). Fails Deletion of Tai Lopez WP:NBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1846 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomás Carbonell (friar) User:E 11:52, 13 November 2017 (UTC) keep A well-sourced - if brief - page on a Bishop. See Deletion of Tomás Carbonell (friar) WP:CLERGYOUTCOMES Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +1847 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Caine User:pd_THOR 14:54, 20 July 2006 (UTC) keep First ten of http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Christine+Caine%22+-wikipedia 10200 google results all seem appropos, http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&q=%22Christine%20Caine%22%20-wikipedia&sa=N&tab=wn google news also serves a relevant result: coordinator for 40000 Hillsong volunteers at July conference in Sydney. Fulfills afaict Deletion of Christine Caine WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1848 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Musical 2016 User:teb728 08:38, 7 November 2016 (UTC) delete per |A11 (by nominator). The musical is clearly madeup by the author. The song and character pages for the musical were all speedily deleted per A11 Deletion of My Musical 2016 WP:A11 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +1849 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surojit Sen User:onel5969 22:56, 14 April 2017 (UTC) delete Doesn't pass , and nowhere near enough in-depth coverage to show they meet Deletion of Surojit Sen WP:NAUTHOR||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1850 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Its greek to me foods User:Eliz81 01:49, 22 September 2007 (UTC) delete Fails and while presumably tasty, reeks of and Deletion of Its greek to me foods WP:CORP||WP:COI||WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1851 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Perry (baseball) User:BRMo 04:40, 19 April 2009 (UTC) delete """Statistics or brief mentions in articles about minor league teams do not constitute """"significant coverage in reliable sources,"""" as required by """ Deletion of Robert Perry (baseball) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1852 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhapsody in Drew (2nd nomination) User:HighwayCello 16:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC) keep isn't this a breach of Deletion of Rhapsody in Drew (2nd nomination) WP:POINT Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +1853 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AFerry User:Themfromspace 19:47, 24 December 2013 (UTC) delete This is a great example of |wikipuffery, where a page is built up to appear like a decent article in an attempt to fool editors into thinking the subject is notable. The bar for getting a website mentioned in passing by reliable sources is small. Add PR pieces to the mix and you can build an encyclopedic-''looking'' but still promotional article about a website pretty easily. And this doesn't help the encyclopedia at all as the website need have no significant impact on the world. Thankfully we have that provision in our notability guidelines requiring in-depth analysis of the subject by multiple reliable sources. This insures that we don't become a database of every website out there, or one that sets itself up for exploitation by PR types Deletion of AFerry WP:PUFF Wikipedia:Wikipuffery 7 +1854 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajesh Shah (3rd nomination) User:Zefr 14:57, 25 September 2017 (UTC) delete """Shah is a charlatan preying on ignorance and gullibility. He claims to have an MD (Homeopathy), an oxymoron because no Higher education accreditation|accredited university provides such a degree, which dishonors the rigor of a true MD. The article contains weak, non-expert, one-sided sources, and is a disguise behind apparent research to blatantly promote his online business at https://www.askdrshah.com/online.aspx where an """"interview"""" begins with step 1, """"Make payment"""". I removed this personal website per . The article should be nominated for speedy deletion per under numerous criteria, including """"unambiguous advertising"""" and """"blatant hoax""" Deletion of Rajesh Shah (3rd nomination) WP:ADMASK||WP:CSD Wikipedia:Spam 26 +1855 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scrollback User:JugniSQ 09:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC) delete No eliable source|reliable source Deletion of Scrollback WP:R Wikipedia:Redirect 73 +1856 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mel Gibson DUI incident (2nd nomination) User:DS1953 23:48, 31 May 2007 (UTC) delete While this event can and should be covered in the Mel Gibson article, it does not merit an article of its own. If it is kept, I hope that someone eventually will be |bold enough to merge Deletion of Mel Gibson DUI incident (2nd nomination) WP:BOLD Wikipedia:Be bold 78 +1857 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Michigan vs. Notre Dame football game User:Paulmcdonald 22:02, 4 April 2012 (UTC) keep I'm quite sure that enough sources exist to more than surpass for inclusion of this article. I'll grant that they should be added to the article, but that is a content/editing issue and not a deletion issue Deletion of 2011 Michigan vs. Notre Dame football game WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1858 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Individual development plan User:Bearian 17:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC) keep per . This is a standard practice in secondary and higher education as well as the workplace and employment law. It is distinct from an evaluation Deletion of Individual development plan WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +1859 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crescent Electric Supply Co. User:Newshunter12 11:47, 8 September 2018 (UTC) delete The article fails due to lacking sufficient reliable sources proving notability. The article seems very promotional in nature and also is serving as a company directory, neither of which is appropriate on Wikipedia Deletion of Crescent Electric Supply Co. WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1860 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herchel Smith Professorship of Pure Mathematics User:Jack 06:00, 21 April 2009 (UTC) keep per , , with non-trivial coverage in major news media (UK Telegraph & BBC NEWs) - also, as to notability, the bequest was the largest ever donated to the university Deletion of Herchel Smith Professorship of Pure Mathematics WP:N||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1861 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sons of Sam Horn (2nd nomination) User:Diana 17:30, 11 May 2009 (UTC) delete It is merely a fan blog, it fails |notability Deletion of Sons of Sam Horn (2nd nomination) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1862 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kivi Sotamaa User:RayAYang 09:59, 20 November 2010 (UTC) delete Fails and . Basically nada under Gscholar for citations, nada in the way of significant coverage Deletion of Kivi Sotamaa WP:BIO||WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1863 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Castillo (Colombian footballer) User:Pharaoh 21:51, 13 May 2018 (UTC) keep passes Deletion of Carlos Castillo (Colombian footballer) WP:NFOOTY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1864 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jane McIvor User:Kagundu 07:34, 16 February 2016 (UTC) delete could not find any significant coverage from third party sources to pass . Also the cases mentioned do not meet threshold for general notability to be included on Wikipedia Deletion of Jane McIvor WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1865 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caiçara Esporte Clube User:Arsenalkid700 23:56, 29 July 2012 (UTC) comment The Copa is the top domestic cup in Brazil. Playing in it should warrant notability as long as the club passes which I shall check. — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Deletion of Caiçara Esporte Clube WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1866 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christos Antoniou User:GiantSnowman 17:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC) delete technically meets with 9 minutes professional play in the Football League Greece in the 2018–19 season (confirmed by https://int.soccerway.com/players/christos-antoniou/504811/ SW), but there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me Deletion of Christos Antoniou WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1867 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennet Taylor User:Coredesat 19:53, 10 August 2006 (UTC) delete fails . No |verifiable information with |reliable sources Deletion of Jennet Taylor WP:BIO||WP:V||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1868 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virgin Tea (B-Side) User:Coredesat 07:27, 22 June 2006 (UTC) delete per |CSD:A1, no context. Fails /SONG Deletion of Virgin Tea (B-Side) WP:CSD||WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +1869 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC 83 User:Dreaded 03:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC) delete """per . Since this AfD was filed, the venue for the event http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=UFC_83&diff=182451026&oldid=182449694 has moved half-way around the world, """"supported"""" by a ref that doesn't contain any mention of UFC 83""" Deletion of UFC 83 WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1870 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Five.Bolt.Main User:Stifle 00:06, 12 April 2006 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Five.Bolt.Main WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1871 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albania–Australia relations User:timtempleton 19:27, 10 July 2017 (UTC) delete seems very thin, and reminds me of the discussion for Bahamian British, also under deletion review. There would be over 37,000 articles if we tried to pair every country up, and without significant evidence that relations are covered with any regularity in the press, this fails . Also should look at this one. Albania–Australia bilateral treaties Deletion of Albania–Australia relations WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1872 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greater Western Norway Region User:Arsenikk 11:31, 15 May 2009 (UTC) delete as Deletion of Greater Western Norway Region WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +1873 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windows Insider User:Samee 23:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC) keep per . The subject is of public interest Deletion of Windows Insider WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1874 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On The Clock Draft User:ColourBurst 19:21, 29 September 2006 (UTC) delete as |vanispamcruftisement Deletion of On The Clock Draft WP:VSCA Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +1875 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Direction's second studio album User:Cliff 18:57, 28 July 2012 (UTC) delete per : No title, no track listing and no release date. Information about this future album should remain at the artist's article until all of those have been verified Deletion of One Direction's second studio album WP:NALBUMS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1876 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWE Druid User:TheSpecialUser 10:24, 28 May 2012 (UTC) delete A PROD would have done the trick but no problem. There is no trace of Deletion of WWE Druid WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1877 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Battlefield 1942 mods [[User:(aeropagitica)|''' (aeropagitica) ''']][[User talk:(aeropagitica)|''' (talk) ''']] 06:30, 13 May 2006 (UTC) delete WP:CRUFT|Listcruft and #Wikipedia_is_not_a_mirror_or_a_repository_of_links.2C_images.2C_or_media_files|a collection of external links, neither of which is encyclopædic. Better off on a games website Deletion of List of Battlefield 1942 mods WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1878 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ozone (festival) User:Ceradon 04:21, 2 March 2015 (UTC) delete I can't seen to determine an assertion of notability in the context of or Deletion of Ozone (festival) WP:GNG||WP:NEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1879 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ra mes ses User:Caknuck 05:29, 7 August 2007 (UTC) delete """Only one source is cited, and it's an atlas. Phrases like '''""""If Ancient Egypt isn't something you have studied intensively...""""''' advertise |OR with giant, blinking neon signs and an eight page insert in the Sunday paper""" Deletion of Ra mes ses WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +1880 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lim Yee Xien User:L3X1 20:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC) delete Fails . Stub Deletion of Lim Yee Xien WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1881 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragan Karanfilovski-Bojs User:Geschichte 21:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC) delete per unless it's sourced that he was a star in Macedonia. Had he been a performer at the ESC it might have been different, but he was just a songwriter. Could redirect to either the song or his family member Deletion of Dragan Karanfilovski-Bojs WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1882 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crazy Planets User:Reyk 05:14, 21 November 2009 (UTC) delete Facebook has zillions of games and applications. Most of them, such as this one, are not notable. The standard for inclusion at Wikipedia is substantial coverage in reliable sources, no matter how many people |like it Deletion of Crazy Planets WP:ILIKEIT Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +1883 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative names for USB flash drive User:DanielT5 15:48, 15 March 2007 (UTC) delete WP:N, , , and I could go on Deletion of Alternative names for USB flash drive WP:NEO||WP:ATT||WP:V Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +1884 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McMillan Fire User:Coolabahapple 12:06, 28 June 2019 (UTC) delete does not meet , also, Deletion of McMillan Fire WP:EVENT||WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1885 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NextStep ReUse [[User talk:71.166.157.40|talk]])}}''' 02:57, 8 October 2010 (UTC) delete Article lacks sufficient ttribution|Attribution for erifiability|Verifiability of the notability criteria, which is why I stuck a {{tl|Db-inc}} on it … given that it has been deleted twice already (#G12|G12 and #A3|A3), perhaps it should be |salted? The author should have used (and in the future, should use) a |sandbox/sub-page to add some (should any exist) and ''then'' move it into article space. Happy Editing! — '''{{#if:71.166.157.40|{{User|71.166.157.40}}|Special:Contributions/71.166.157.40|71.166.157.40 Deletion of NextStep ReUse WP:A||WP:V||WP:CORP||WP:CSD||WP:CSD||WP:SALT||WP:SUB||WP:RS Wikipedia:Attribution 34 +1886 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estadio Argelio Sabillón User:Junior5a 21:08, 12 July 2020 (UTC) keep Meets . There's no need to delete it Deletion of Estadio Argelio Sabillón :WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1887 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of stalked celebrities User:Moreschi 22:11, 16 February 2007 (UTC) delete per nom and everyone else. #INFO|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information Deletion of List of stalked celebrities WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1888 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mutha's Day Out User:wknight94 16:47, 28 January 2006 (UTC) comment Maybe I need an education here. Being an opening act on a tour is still considered a tour in regards to ? If so, then I agree - close this one up Deletion of Mutha's Day Out WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1889 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional Armenians User:Shooterwalker 16:06, 5 July 2010 (UTC) delete WP:NOTDIR|Wikipedia is not a directory. Arbitrary cross-categorization that fails and can only be written by synthesizing |original research. Wikipedia shouldn't be the first place to publish anything Deletion of List of fictional Armenians WP:SALAT||WP:OR Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists 51 +1890 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 FIFA U-20 World Cup User:Sir 17:24, 25 February 2017 (UTC) delete As an obvious case of . While the tournament will obviously be notable at some point, there just isn't anything to say about it yet Deletion of 2021 FIFA U-20 World Cup WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +1891 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MediaShout User:EEMIV 14:23, 23 September 2008 (UTC) delete not-notable, |unreferenced Deletion of MediaShout WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1892 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctors for America User:NickCT 18:51, 21 December 2020 (UTC) keep I do have trouble finding direct coverage in secondary sources, but the group seems to have received at least passing mention in virtually every news outlet out there (e.g. https://www.miamiherald.com/news/health-care/article247668425.html Miami Herald, https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook-pm/2020/11/25/the-trump-biden-split-screen-490997 Politico, https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2020-12-06/joe-biden-xavier-becerra-health-and-human-services-secretary LA Times, https://www.wsj.com/articles/joe-bidens-white-house-and-cabinet-picks-11606160202 WSJ, https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/As-coronavirus-cases-increase-at-detention-15303943.php Houston Chronicle, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-05-01/doctors-call-for-u-s-czar-to-coordinate-equipment-tests Bloomberg, https://newyork.cbslocal.com/2020/08/26/cdc-covid-19-testing-guidelines-change-doctors-react/ CBS, https://www.washingtonpost.com/washington-post-live/2020/09/10/americas-health-future/ WaPo, https://www.nytimes.com/live/2020/11/09/us/joe-biden-trump NYT). Even if there isn't any direct coverage, the indirect coverage so broad as to meet Deletion of Doctors for America WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1893 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allie Marie Evans User:GrammarFascist 00:41, 20 August 2017 (UTC) delete """There's coverage of both her acting (mostly about her role in ''Maximum Ride'') and her earlier """"beauty vlogging"""" (which I guess is a thing?) but seemingly nothing substantial, and it's largely dubiously-reliable sources, though there were some exceptions (e.g. ''LA Times''). Maybe just """ Deletion of Allie Marie Evans WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +1894 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard Morris User:Mandsford 03:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC) delete """based on no demonstrated notability, and no entitlement at all to inherent notability. The phrase """"Competitors who have competed at the highest level of amateur sports"""" is preceded by another section that refers to """"Competitors who have competed in a fully professional league, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport such as swimming, golf or tennis."""" If it had been intended that """"competed in an high-level amateur league"""" was entitled to the same treatment as """"competed in a fully professional league"""", then something of that nature could have been added. But it wasn't. I would conclude that does not mean that all college athletes are notable just by having competed in a major college football conference. """"Highest level of amateur sports"""" would not mean a bye just by playing NCAA Division I-A football. Arguably, Bernard Morris could potentially be shown to be notable in comparison to other college (amateur) football players, such as an All-America selection, or being invited to play in an all-star college game (Hula Bowl, Shrine Game, etc.). Passing for 1,346 yards isn't too shabby, but it's not passing leader material either""" Deletion of Bernard Morris WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1895 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zee (rapper) User:Pharaoh 06:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Zee (rapper) WP:GNG||WP:NMUSICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1896 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QuicksellOnline User:AllyD 08:14, 26 January 2017 (UTC) delete """A article on a yet-to-launch e-commerce site, in which circumstance it is unsurprising that no |evidence of attained encyclopaedic notability (, , ) can be found. It is also worded as an advertisement (''""""Our customer friendly features""""'') which combined with the lack of claim of notability would have made CSD A7+G11 possible, but at this stage maybe it is better to let the AfD take its course""" Deletion of QuicksellOnline :WP:SPA||:WP:RS||:WP:NWEB||:WP:CORPDEPTH||:WP:GNG Wikipedia:Single-purpose account 21 +1897 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David William Parry (2nd nomination) User:Posen607 05:17, 14 August 2020 (UTC) keep """Firstly, please, note that the individual is not solely a poet. As it is already indicated in the article, he is also a dramaturge (theatre director, producer, actor), essayist and pastor, amongst other things. Therefore, his notability has to be noted in combination with multiple sources over a number of fields as opposed to one . Secondly, references support the content of the article, and demonstrate the individual's international notability (in the UK, Azerbaijan and Central Asia), through interviews with https://www.e-ir.info/2018/12/06/interview-david-parry/ E-International Relations (""""the world's leading open access website for students and scholars of international politics"""") and the https://www.bbc.com/kyrgyz/entertainment/2015/01/150116_iv_devid_parry_literature BBC, or articles about his professional work in The European Azerbaijan Society Magazine (TEAS), OCA Magazine (London), The Astana Times as well as reviews about his books, for example, in the the London Magazine. Obviously, some sources are printed and not available online. Where this is the case, there are specific details about the name, title, journal, year of publication and relevant pages of each source. Lastly, as far as I am aware, speaker candidates for TEDx events undergo rigorous selection processes (according to each individual's significance) before they are chosen as participants. This individual is already listed on the TED Talks website as a speaker in https://www.ted.com/tedx/events/33524 2019 and again in https://www.ted.com/tedx/events/38604 2020. All making me convinced this figure meets notability standards""" Deletion of David William Parry (2nd nomination) WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1898 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corporate Representatives for Ethical Wikipedia Engagement User:SMcCandlish 17:49, 12 March 2012 (UTC) merge """per GabrielF or '''delete''' otherwise or '''move to projectspace''' I don't care which: There's no question that the debate is at least marginally notable, but this particular quasi-organization isn't. It's no surprise that PR professionals, whose job it is to cultivate relationships with journalists, can drum up a """"maybe just enough"""" level of press coverage almost entirely in PR publications that happens to mention the Facebook group, but I think we all know here that the coverage is of the """"PR industry vs. Wikipedia"""" issue, not {{em|inherently of the Facebook group}}, which is mentioned incidentally. If tomorrow the group switched sites and became a YahooGroup called PRWiki or laugh! moved to Wikia and was a wiki there called WikiComms, the next article on the topic would mention the new location and name and not ever bother mentioning the then-defunct Facebook group. The name and location of the group is entirely tangential to the real issue, which is Wikipedia policy clashing with real-world commercial interests. There's no issue here. Keeping an article on the Facebook group itself on GNG grounds would border on |wikilawyering, honoring the wording rather than the spirit of notability policy, because no one actually |GAFs about the group itself, but rather about the issue they're raising, and we all know that the higher-powered members of CREWE can manufacture press coverage with trivial ease. Our system is wide open to here""" Deletion of Corporate Representatives for Ethical Wikipedia Engagement WP:COATRACK||WP:LAWYER||WP:DGAF||WP:GAMING Wikipedia:Coatrack articles 47 +1899 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herbert Cecil Potter User:Bejnar 07:43, 22 September 2014 (UTC) keep Potter was a Brigadier-General, and was awarded both the CMG and the DSO. Seems to meet Deletion of Herbert Cecil Potter WP:SOLDIER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1900 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omar Nabil Elhussieny User:Jersey92 20:16, 14 August 2014 (UTC) delete Not a full pro. Fails Deletion of Omar Nabil Elhussieny WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1901 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tønder concentration camp User:JohnCD 21:43, 11 April 2013 (UTC) delete """as failing unless some reliable source can be found. The Danish article :da:Koncentrationslejr mentions only Horserød and Frøslev. A search for """"Tønder koncentrationslejr"""" produced nothing relevant - one possible turned out to be about a resister from Tønder who was sent to a camp in Germany. Even if there was a camp of some kind at Tønder, what is described sounds like a transit camp rather than a concentration camp as that term is normally understood""" Deletion of Tønder concentration camp WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1902 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prof K E Viswanathan User:Utcursch 05:18, 24 October 2006 (UTC) delete Fails . Also Deletion of Prof K E Viswanathan WP:PROF||WP:AUTO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1903 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Palestinian civilian casualties in the Second Intifada User:NSH001 09:04, 14 February 2010 (UTC) keep This is one of the worst examples of '''bad faith''' nominations I've seen. So we can keep List of Israeli civilian casualties in the Second Intifada but not this one? This would be a blatant violation of , even more so given that the numbers of Palestinian deaths and other casualties are much higher than the Israeli ones. The argument is inapplicable here, since what is really being proposed is a , as is obvious from the history of this article explained by Tiamut above Deletion of List of Palestinian civilian casualties in the Second Intifada WP:NPOV||WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:POVFORK Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +1904 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lil' Kim's fifth studio album User:Sue 02:54, 6 December 2012 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Lil' Kim's fifth studio album WP:HAMMER Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law 11 +1905 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naoki Sano User:Nikki311 04:46, 16 February 2010 (UTC) keep passes as a professional wrestler, as previously mentioned. In addition, he passes it as a mixed martial artist, as he was a part of the Pride Fighting Championships, one of the top MMA companies Deletion of Naoki Sano WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1906 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William W. McCorkle Jr. User:Nuttah 08:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC) delete as no evidence from reliable sources of how the subject meets or is provided or apparently available Deletion of William W. McCorkle Jr. WP:PROF||WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1907 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristofer Duarte User:Editorofthewiki 01:05, 30 July 2008 (UTC) delete This practically reads as spam. Fails and . --I'm an '''''Special:Contributions/Editorofthewiki|Editor Deletion of Cristofer Duarte WP:RS||WP:N Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1908 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amit Offir User:Dial911 23:23, 22 September 2018 (UTC) delete Most of the references are OCLC number of his books. The article, at its current state fails Deletion of Amit Offir WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1909 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Junior Wrestling Championships [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 16:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC) delete per and . Many of these articles look suspiciously like the work of ockpuppet_investigations/Mauricio80/Archive|Mauricio80 Deletion of World Junior Wrestling Championships WP:SPORTSEVENT||WP:NOTSTATS||WP:S Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1910 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/For This Cause (band) User:Lankiveil 12:04, 9 August 2012 (UTC) delete the usual garage band stuff, but nothing that indicates that the band meets or is close to meeting any of the criteria Deletion of For This Cause (band) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1911 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esperanto Pen Pal Service User:Ihcoyc 14:49, 21 April 2006 (UTC) merge """per Hyperbole, but '''w/o prejudice''' to recreating a better version. The concept is almost self-explanatory; on the other hand, organizing Esperanto pen pals has long been a project of the Esperanto movement, and an explanation of that aspect of the movement may make a good article. In this case, the article should no longer be """"about a website"""" and may not apply""" Deletion of Esperanto Pen Pal Service WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1912 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keyur Parikh User:JJL 00:36, 6 August 2009 (UTC) keep borderline notability (based principally on )--err on the side of retaining info Deletion of Keyur Parikh WP:ACADEMIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1913 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salem Local Planning Authority User:Ab207 15:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC) merge to Directorate of Town and Country Planning#Salem LPA, its parent orgnaization. It's unclear whether this topic meets GNG, regardless the target article already duplicates the content present here and this topic can easily be covered there (per ). Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiruchirappalli Local Planning Authority resulted in a similar outcome Deletion of Salem Local Planning Authority WP:NOPAGE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1914 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MoreViews User:Ihcoyc 16:14, 6 February 2013 (UTC) delete A ''|social media marketing company that helps improve a company's online presence primarily through the use of social networks'' |advertising on Wikipedia, and |where have we heard that before Deletion of MoreViews WP:B2B||WP:SPAM||WP:MILL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1915 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TriPoint Global Equities User:HighKing 14:27, 19 September 2018 (UTC) delete I can't find any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, fails GNG and Deletion of TriPoint Global Equities WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1916 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Edwards (Australian footballer) User:GiantSnowman 17:56, 13 September 2013 (UTC) delete fails and . Coverage is not significant, relates to his famous dad and the fact he has signed for a club Deletion of Ryan Edwards (Australian footballer) WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1917 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Norwood User:Ejgreen77 14:35, 2 January 2016 (UTC) keep """as a pass, per Cbl62's sources. I also note that the infobox on the pages states under """"Playing career"""" that Norwood played in the CFL for the Calgary Stampeders in 1989. If that is true, and he actually appeared in games for the Stamps, then he would automatically pass , anyways. Bottom line: either way, he's notable""" Deletion of Brian Norwood WP:GNG||WP:NGRIDIRON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1918 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Land of Hero User:Czar 03:04, 5 November 2012 (UTC) delete Zilch towards |GNG. Game's kind of new, so watch this http://www.metacritic.com/game/ios/land-of-hero/critic-reviews Metacritic page for potential reviews. I'll obviously reconsider if there are reliable non-English sources. I couldn't find any Deletion of Land of Hero WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1919 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tian Bing User:Zanhe 22:58, 6 June 2018 (UTC) keep as the first Chinese person to compete in WWE, he has received significant coverage from both Chinese- and English-language media, as shown by Lee Vilenski above. Meets Deletion of Tian Bing WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1920 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorna Bourg User:Pburka 15:41, 21 May 2021 (UTC) keep In my opinion, a MacArthur Fellowship is sufficient for Deletion of Lorna Bourg WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1921 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nothing's How It Used To Be User:DESiegel 17:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC) delete as per my own nomination above '''unless''' sources are presented that establish the notability of this single, in accord with or the . If sources that I failed to find are presented, and they clearly establish notability, i would withdraw this nomination, as notability is the only issue here in my view Deletion of Nothing's How It Used To Be WP:MUSIC||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1922 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Collins III User:Bkissin 15:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC) delete and '''Redirect''' to 2020 United States House of Representatives elections in California#District 43. Failed politician fails and I echo the PROMO concerns of {{u|Edawrdx Deletion of Joe Collins III WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1923 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaize Kazmi User:4meter4 18:57, 29 February 2020 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Shaize Kazmi WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1924 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/12 Barz of Christmas User:Sparklism 13:42, 8 November 2012 (UTC) delete Zero Gnews hits, and most other hits just point to promotion of this non-notable event. Fails Deletion of 12 Barz of Christmas WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1925 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWER User:4meter4 22:34, 6 November 2019 (UTC) delete Lacks RS. Fails Deletion of DWER WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1926 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logitech MX revolution User:Djbrianuk 23:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC) comment No, that's not Wikipedia policy - anyone can remove a prod from an article for any reason bar blatant vandalism. Please see Deletion of Logitech MX revolution WP:PROD Wikipedia:Proposed deletion 92 +1927 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brienne Ghafourifar User:Grayfell 22:59, 21 December 2015 (UTC) delete """Too soon. There are now a lot of sources after a Wikipedia:Bombardment|refbomb, but most of them are interviews or superficial coverage in self-congratulatory Bay-area """"start-up culture"""" blogs and borderline PR outfits. The rest are listing her as an example related to ''She Started It''. Trying to assess the reliability of these sources is a great way to win at buzzword bingo, but there's very little indication of fact-checking or strong editorial oversight. One good examples is QuinStreet|IT Business Edge (The website's banner says """"IT Business Edge - an IT Business Edge site"""". How helpful). It's mainly an advertising outfit, not a |reliable source. The """"world record"""" she holds doesn't appear to be one of recognized significance. Has anyone verified this record? Who came in second? Who held the record before she did? Nobody seems to care outside of PR. The sources suggest that maybe ''She Started It'' is noteworthy, but I don't think that extends to Ghafourifar yet""" Deletion of Brienne Ghafourifar WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1928 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saidy Janko User:GiantSnowman 17:26, 6 September 2013 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Saidy Janko WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1929 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of the Saudi government and the Islamic State User:Cowlibob 21:14, 22 August 2015 (UTC) delete Article topic doesn't meet GNG. Only one source on the article refers to similarities between the two entities in reference to penal punishments which if deemed worthy could be included in other articles. Article reads very much like an essay by the article creator. The very first sentence is a very contentious claim that the Saudi Arabia government directly helped ISIL over a number of years. Something even our article on ISIL doesn't make, indeed it makes the opposite statement. The last sentence refers to ISIL as a country which is a claim not recognised by any state/country in the world. At best this is an attempt by the article creator at synthesis while at worst I fear it is an attempt to advocate for ISIL by pointing out similarities between it and one of the leading Muslim countries Deletion of Comparison of the Saudi government and the Islamic State WP:SYNTH Wikipedia:No original research 12 +1930 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Blue Wing Airlines Antonov An-28 crash User:Shadowjams 09:01, 25 August 2010 (UTC) delete I don't see sufficient notability outside of routine news reports. Tragedy, but not notable in the sense Deletion of 2010 Blue Wing Airlines Antonov An-28 crash WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1931 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angel Mendez User:Kges1901 22:06, 12 January 2021 (UTC) keep Meeting is coverage, not achievement based, and Mendez passes the coverage bar with significant coverage in multiple independent RS newspapers. He is the subject of a https://www.newspapers.com/clip/67492308/angel-mendez-navy-cross-upgrade/ front-page story in the ''Philadelphia Inquirer'', a large-circulation major city newspaper, and numerous news articles such as https://www.newspapers.com/clip/67492680/angel-mendez/ https://www.silive.com/news/2011/05/fighting_for_a_heros_place_in.html https://www.silive.com/northshore/2012/01/st_george_post_office_will_be.html https://www.silive.com/news/2012/04/staten_island_post_office_rena.html https://www.silive.com/life-and-culture/g66l-2019/04/f1fe76bf308221/marine-corps-league-renamed-sgt-angel-mendez-detachment-during-dedication-ceremony-in-sunnyside.html Deletion of Angel Mendez WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1932 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sohail Asif Qureshi User:Joe 09:49, 30 December 2017 (UTC) comment The subject of the article https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sohail_Asif_Qureshi&diff=520605723&oldid=prev apparently wants it to be deleted, so even if there is marginal notability editors may want to bear in mind . –  Deletion of Sohail Asif Qureshi WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +1933 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of works of fiction set in 2029 User:Coolabahapple 07:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC) comment """we already have these cats ie. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:2029_in_fiction Category:2029 in fiction, do we need list articles that are essentially duplicates? do these meet ?, where are these """"discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources""" Deletion of List of works of fiction set in 2029 WP:LISTN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1934 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C. Anandharamakrishnan (2nd nomination) User:Xxanthippe 22:52, 18 November 2017 (UTC) keep as in August AfD. Passes rof#C1 and rof#C3 Deletion of C. Anandharamakrishnan (2nd nomination) WP:P||WP:P Wikipedia:Portal 50 +1935 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Martian canals User:Britishfinance 20:22, 21 February 2019 (UTC) keep The topic of Martian canals is notable (they have an WP article). I have added links to articles in Nature and Scientific American about them. Obviously the theory turned out to be bogus but that does not diminish from the considerable time and investigation by leading academics (plus wider public) in this issue (there are loads of references to this topic on any google search). My issue however is where this exact list came from? I have added external links to PDF copies of Lovell's book and the relevant Chapter IV on the Canals. However, I am not sure how this list compares (it is not a direct extraction). I guess we still have a potential issue (but not a notability issue), but given that the lists/diagrams exist, it it solvable task, and clearly someone went to great trouble to complete this list many years ago implying that it is probably right. However, all of this should no prevent the article from being kept Deletion of List of Martian canals WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1936 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincent Yatz User:Rorshacma 15:54, 17 December 2020 (UTC) merge to Creeper (DC Comics) - Unlike the other two Creeper-related AFDs today, this character does get a few brief mentions here or there under his various names, largely due to the fact that he is explicitly tied to the origin of the notable character, The Creeper. Not enough to actually pass the or support an independent article, but enough that it would make sense to redirect this page to the main page on the Creeper, where he is actually already discussed quite a bit Deletion of Vincent Yatz WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1937 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellen Johnson User:MCB 22:53, 22 January 2006 (UTC) keep bad faith nom, . After 10 or more of these it is time to block nominator for disruption of Wikipedia Deletion of Ellen Johnson WP:POINT Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +1938 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of current professional wrestling champions User:Lugnuts 09:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC) keep """This is a list of notable champions held by notable people from notable promotions. The inclusion criteria would clearly be '''notable''' promotions - IE they have an article here. Looking at the List of professional wrestling promotions, there aren't really that many current promotions. Unsourced? . It can't be that hard to source. By looking down the list, may of them seem to have sub-lists of champions by belt, which as Featured Lists in their own right. """"Original search""""? Haha, no. Unmanageable list? Wrong again. And that's not a valid rationale for deletion either. Basically the two deletion nominations smack of """ Deletion of List of current professional wrestling champions WP:SOFIXIT||WP:IDONTLIKEIT Wikipedia:Be bold 78 +1939 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonic Next Gen Series User:Plm209 17:03, 23 January 2008 (UTC) delete Simply a list of links to sonic characters with their own articles. Falls under Deletion of Sonic Next Gen Series WP:CRUFT Wikipedia:Fancruft 61 +1940 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Dean (writer) User:Gongshow 01:15, 28 September 2017 (UTC) keep Coverage of this author's works in multiple reliable sources, which satisfies #3 Deletion of Josh Dean (writer) WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1941 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Zalewski User:Rlendog 22:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC) delete Doesn't meet and not finding significant coverage Deletion of Richard Zalewski WP:NHOCKEY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1942 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Number Four in the Apocalypse User:Loriendrew 03:40, 10 October 2014 (UTC) delete WP:OR and Deletion of The Number Four in the Apocalypse WP:NOTESSAY Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1943 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mad Hatter Studios User:JMHamo 11:42, 1 March 2014 (UTC) delete Fails comprehensively Deletion of Mad Hatter Studios WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1944 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Evans Maude User:David 06:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC) keep Two books about him seems enough for Deletion of Henry Evans Maude WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1945 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gwendolyn Masin User:doomsdayer520 14:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC) keep She has some notice in the classical music community, which can support a basic stub article here. However, the article absolutely needs to be cut down to notable and verifiable facts, while removing obvious |CV-like minutiae. That is a cleanup job and not a reason to delete Deletion of Gwendolyn Masin WP:NOTRESUME Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1946 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Håkon Winther User:Jogurney 04:09, 10 August 2008 (UTC) delete it appears that author/subject of the article has never played in a fully professional league (until sources are provided to demonstrate otherwise) and I doubt that his founding of the playerhistory.com website is sufficient to pass . Perhaps there are reliable sources that demonstrate notability related to the website activities, but none are provided Deletion of Håkon Winther WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1947 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maniak (2008) [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 12:49, 2 June 2013 (UTC) delete The film's producer was spamming these films and the director across Wikipedia until they were blocked for a username violation. This article lacks available reliable sources and fails Deletion of Maniak (2008) WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1948 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/From Me Flows What You Call Time User:Gidonb 20:21, 27 December 2017 (UTC) merge if any) for that article. Rationale: As a standalone I disagree that there is justification for this article. Reasons were mentioned by others above and for me these trump the . It may still be a legitimate spinout of Future Library project given sufficient importance and substance of that article. It is unclear to me at this stage that Future Library project is terribly important and irrelevant whether this is the case (hence will not check) since Future Library is short and underdeveloped. Hence we should add a line or more and some sources from From Me Flows What You Call Time into Future Library project and redirect Deletion of From Me Flows What You Call Time WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1949 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Brand Vision User:CNMall41 23:43, 16 March 2016 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of New Brand Vision WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1950 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aussieschoolmates User:SM247 01:03, 6 July 2006 (UTC) delete per above, fails Deletion of Aussieschoolmates WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1951 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Cruz Couture (2nd nomination) User:HighKing 21:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC) delete """The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations is and applies a stricter interpretation of requirements than for other topics. In short, requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |""""Independent Content"""". """"Independent content"""", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails """ Deletion of Sebastian Cruz Couture (2nd nomination) WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1952 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Barnett (3rd nomination) User:K 03:27, 15 November 2016 (UTC) delete per (literally); the subject is not yet notable Deletion of Jacob Barnett (3rd nomination) WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +1953 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Bahareth (2nd nomination) User:Crh23 08:08, 22 April 2016 (UTC) delete can't find anything to assert |notability, nor anything to pass . Since most of the search hits are about his books, I'll mention that he doesn't appear meet AUTHOR either. —  Deletion of Mohammad Bahareth (2nd nomination) WP:N||WP:ANYBIO||WP:NAUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1954 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph M. Still Burn Center User:Dhartung 04:25, 30 March 2008 (UTC) keep """largest privately-owned burn center in the US is a strong claim to notability. (Note that New York Presbyterian's Hearst Burn Center is probably the largest overallhttp://www.nyp.org/services/burn-center.html, despite some stories about Still dropping the """"private"""".) Certainly there are numerous sources demonstrating an ability to pass """ Deletion of Joseph M. Still Burn Center WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1955 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Awards User:GarrieIrons 05:10, 12 January 2007 (UTC) keep even discounting the reference to channel V, there are plenty of entertainment organisations talking about them. Hopefully, they'll still be around in five years and still have the same sponsor Deletion of Jack Awards WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +1956 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dunn Consistency Model User:danntm 02:14, 19 October 2006 (UTC) delete as |hoax, per Uncle G Deletion of Dunn Consistency Model WP:HOAX Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes 40 +1957 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palayathu Vayal Govt. UP School User:Lankiveil 01:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC) keep typically I'd argue that 99.9% of primary schools are not notable and should not have articles. However, this case seems unusual in that there appears to be feature articles and television documentaries on the subject, which would appear to indicate it meets the . I don't speak the language, so I don't know how substantial these are (hence the 'weak'), but I think we can give this one the benefit of the doubt Deletion of Palayathu Vayal Govt. UP School WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1958 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erika Andiola User:Bakazaka 21:55, 17 November 2018 (UTC) keep """as subject easily passes . Even under the non-policy, non-guideline """"name in headlines in articles that are supposed to be about her"""" criterion introduced into this discussion, the subject passes, see e.g. {{cite news|url=http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/11/nation/la-na-nn-erika-andiola-immigrant-activist-family-detained-by-immigration-officials-20130111|title=Relatives of Erika Andiola, immigrant activist, detained|work=Los Angeles Times|first=Cindy|last=Carcamo|date=January 11, 2013|access-date=November 17, 2018}} Thanks to {{u|Megalibrarygirl}} for putting in the work to improve the article""" Deletion of Erika Andiola WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1959 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disturbed's fifth studio album User:TenPoundHammer 13:33, 19 February 2010 (UTC) delete per . Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Many otters • :User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat Deletion of Disturbed's fifth studio album WP:HAMMER Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law 11 +1960 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Science and Technology Education Center User:Adamant1 23:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC) delete """I did a search for ASTEC Charter School and the only thing that came up were two results in Google News. Both of which are extremely trivial. One is about them breaking ground on a new building is about them receiving a """"STEM Gift."""" Whatever that is. Neither pass . The next article down is about rodent droppings in a Chinese restaurant. Which clearly isn't relevant and things don't get any better from there. 12 results or so down is a local article about something throwing a plastic cow off the schools roof as a prank. At least that one is about the school, sorta. Although, it's still not helpful. So, although there are technically """"results"""" if you use ASTEC Charter School as the search term, they clearly aren't relevant, useful, or help establish notability""" Deletion of Advanced Science and Technology Education Center WP:NORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1961 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Soulmate Project User:Geschichte 08:57, 5 November 2020 (UTC) delete per , no notability as a planned show Deletion of The Soulmate Project WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1962 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelvin Castillo User:IJA 10:59, 25 October 2014 (UTC) delete He hasn't played in a Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues|Fully professional league and he doesn't have any senior international caps either therefore he fails Deletion of Kelvin Castillo WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1963 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Lalli User:GiantSnowman 17:39, 6 April 2009 (UTC) delete they all fail Deletion of Tony Lalli WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1964 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Running on Empty (comic) User:Mr 21:01, 6 April 2007 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Running on Empty (comic) WP:N||WP:ATT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1965 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint-Germain-des-Prés Café User:Stuartyeates 22:56, 10 September 2011 (UTC) delete as failing alternatively '''Merge&redirect''' and tag as needing references Deletion of Saint-Germain-des-Prés Café WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1966 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamas and the Taliban analogy User:JFlav 03:49, 8 November 2010 (UTC) delete as |original research, specifically for overuse of |primary sources. I agree with Deletion of Hamas and the Taliban analogy WP:OR||WP:PRIMARY Wikipedia:No original research 12 +1967 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KDE Frameworks User:Djm 07:22, 11 August 2021 (UTC) keep It is seems it is that has been violated, the tone being vexacious. Per the state of sourcing within the article is in itself not relevant, and that is what is in the nomination on my visitation. It is lamentable the state of the sourcing in the article but I see no evidence of a here in the nomination. Thankyou Deletion of KDE Frameworks WP:BEFORE||WP:NEXIST||WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +1968 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Depression and natural therapies User:VigilancePrime 04:28, 5 January 2008 (UTC) delete """and if necessary relocate good information. Much of the article should be in individual pages, such as Acupuncture, Amino Acids, Coffee, Inositol, and Reiki. This is a clear POV fork and I feel it was written for a particular |POV as well, evidenced by subtle POV statements such as """"drug companies have responded with a ''vast arsenal'' of antidepressant medications"""" and """"they nevertheless may have a contribution to make""" Deletion of Depression and natural therapies WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +1969 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atongko (film) User:Pharaoh 18:47, 13 January 2016 (UTC) delete Fails and lacks reliable third party sources Deletion of Atongko (film) WP:NF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1970 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave's Picks Volume 17 User:Mudwater 11:54, 18 January 2016 (UTC) keep """Although the album won't be released for another two weeks, it meets the |General Notability Guideline -- that is, it """"has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject"""". When this AFD was submitted the article didn't have any references, but I've added some now""" Deletion of Dave's Picks Volume 17 WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1971 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesus Taught Me User:Sxeptomaniac 18:34, 22 September 2009 (UTC) keep I was primarily concerned about the significant issues when I nominated it the first time. I'm still not really sure it's a worthwhile article, but I'll lean a little towards keep for this nomination and see if it can improve with a little more time Deletion of Jesus Taught Me WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +1972 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starship HLS User:DmitriRomanovJr 10:29, 23 April 2021 (UTC) keep Passes as per current coverage Deletion of Starship HLS WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1973 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Affluenza: When Too Much is Never Enough User:Lankiveil 09:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC) keep meets and due to secondary coverage in reliable sources. Suggest that it's time to consider a Snow Keep Deletion of Affluenza: When Too Much is Never Enough WP:BK||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1974 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Realm (magazine) User:Newshunter12 10:18, 22 September 2018 (UTC) delete The article fails because the magazine lacks that it was or remains notable. I would also note that the article has only one citation after nearly 14 years in existence and it didn't even work when I tried to use it. I was able to find no information about this magazine when I did a search Deletion of Realm (magazine) WP:NMEDIA||WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1975 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deuce untitled album User:Purplebackpack89 23:55, 18 April 2011 (UTC) delete Duh-duh-duh, (duh-duh), duh-duh-duh, |Can't touch this Deletion of Deuce untitled album WP:HAMMERTIME Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law 11 +1976 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gosnell: The Trial of America's Biggest Serial Killer User:AlessandroTiandelli333 14:07, 23 October 2018 (UTC) keep Passes , and FILM Deletion of Gosnell: The Trial of America's Biggest Serial Killer WP:GNG||WP:N||WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1977 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gintor User:Nscheffey 14:11, 27 June 2006 (UTC) delete Actually, this article '''is''' about Gintor.com, so Gintor.com has to be notable enough to be |verifiable. The only claim to notability I see here, the file format, links to a page with exactly no information about said format. Maybe this could be mentioned in some article about warez or warez groups but there's nothing here to show it merits its own article Deletion of Gintor WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1978 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syntasoft User:AllyD 07:04, 16 May 2018 (UTC) delete Nothing better than Wikipedia mirrors and a download site found in searches. No claim or |evidence of notability. Fails Deletion of Syntasoft :WP:RS||:WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1979 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan-Zico Black User:Simione001 09:57, 25 July 2012 (UTC) keep Has played in the FA Cup on a number of occasions and has also represented Northern Ireland at under 21 level. Easily meets with articles such as http://www.poppiesfans.com/2005/11/ryan-zico-black-signs-for-poppies/, http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/13222939, http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/7624663.stm, http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/18072286, http://www.thisisguernsey.com/sport/2012/03/13/brazil-nut-%E2%80%98zico%E2%80%99-to-be-filmed/, http://thetwounfortunates.com/regionalism-week-guernsey-fcs-flying-start/, http://www.nonleaguedaily.com/news/index.php?&newsmode=FULL&nid=18392 Deletion of Ryan-Zico Black WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1980 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baha Alzalg User:BernardoSulzbach 02:25, 3 January 2020 (UTC) delete """The thing that I dislike the most about this is that it was entirely written by the person the article is about using their own sources, which makes the """"independent of the subject"""" invalid""" Deletion of Baha Alzalg WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1981 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international goals scored by Abby Wambach User:Harrias 17:33, 13 April 2013 (UTC) keep although the article is clearly in a bad way, breaching a number of our manual of style article, that is irrelevant when determining notability. The parent article is long enough that to add this list onto it would not be viable, and it is my belief that given the extraordinary number of goals that she has scored, and that |Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopaedia this is a justified standalone list Deletion of List of international goals scored by Abby Wambach WP:NOTPAPER Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1982 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R3 Ring road (Belgium) User:Arxiloxos 16:32, 20 December 2012 (UTC) comment """Isn't this the kind of numbered, limited access, national road system highway that is generally kept, per and per the statement at Wikipedia:Notability (highways) that """"highways that are numbered and signed as part of a single, national highway network are generally notable and should have their own articles""""? Note that the Frenchhttp://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat%C3%A9gorie:Ring_belge and Dutchhttp://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorie:Ringweg_in_Belgi%C3%AB Wikipedias, and others, have comprehensive coverage of the Belgian ring roads, and that a GNews search for turns up current coverage of this road https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=aw4&tbo=d&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&biw=1680&bih=865&tbm=nws&q=r3+ring+Charleroi&oq=r3+ring+Charleroi&gs_l=serp.12...7913.8495.0.11990.5.5.0.0.0.2.123.475.3j2.5.0...0.0...1c.1.zVr-h-HBjqQhttps://www.google.com/search?q=r3+ring+Charleroi&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=UHk&tbo=d&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&tbm=nws&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=FDzTUKrQDsKsjALfhYEQ&ved=0CCQQpwUoBQ&biw=1680&bih=865""" Deletion of R3 Ring road (Belgium) WP:ROADOUTCOMES Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +1983 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Clements Caves User:MacGyverMagic 09:25, 9 January 2009 (UTC) keep It is long-standing practice to keep articles on verifiable georgraphical features like towns, rivers, and mountains. I believe caves about which enough can be written belong in the same group. A basic http://www.google.com/search?sa=N&tab=nw&q=%22%22st.%20clements%20caves google search indicates there's a potential for expansion and quite some reliable sources to meet Deletion of St. Clements Caves WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1984 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikiFur (2nd nomination) User:DyslexicEditor 19:39, 3 November 2006 (UTC) delete Why it fails . It's sources are Wikipedia, Wikia, Wikimania wiki, a something awful forum post, and the only media reference http://www.cparchives.com/archive.cfm?type=Main%20Feature&action=getComplete&ref=6353 here is not about Wikifur, but about furries and only mentions Wikifur as a reference. It is basically no more a source http://observer.guardian.co.uk/magazine/story/0,,1497856,00.html than this reference to a different wiki and that wiki article got deleted. I've seen articles full of sources and even gotten on television by MSNBC and they've been deleted. Basically one vague mention in a newspaper article doesn't cut it for most articles and I see hundreds deleted each month with similar sources and they all just aren't notable enough Deletion of WikiFur (2nd nomination) WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1985 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alt.talk.creationism User:Exit2DOS2000 07:56, 17 January 2008 (UTC) delete nothing this group may have done had a |Verifiable effect Deletion of Alt.talk.creationism WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +1986 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet Watch Foundation and Wikipedia User:Ros0709 NONE comment Time to close per yet Deletion of Internet Watch Foundation and Wikipedia WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +1987 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King of the Gypsies User:Lacypaperclip 04:41, 14 January 2018 (UTC) keep The article is well sourced and passes Deletion of King of the Gypsies WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1988 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Disney Princess firsts User:NoCOBOL 09:04, 4 January 2019 (UTC) delete The general rule for stand-alone lists is that it is notable if there is significant coverage of the elements of the list as a group. This is not true in this case, where the list has been assembled by cobbling various trivia facts about the characters - which indeed also falls foul of . Finally, while some may find it or, alas, , these are not standards for inclusion on Wikipedia. However, perhaps some of the information would be worthy of transfer to the individual articles Deletion of List of Disney Princess firsts WP:LISTN||WP:TRIVIA||WP:INTERESTING||WP:USEFUL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1989 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moh Azima User:EdJohnston 19:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC) delete All this article's references are blogs. Apparently no press reviews of his work, no independent recognition. Does not meet . Even for feature-length movies we would expect to see press reviews to assure notability, and what's shown here is much less than that Deletion of Moh Azima WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1990 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peaceful Anarchism User:Iridescenti 21:12, 24 April 2007 (UTC) delete """OR and total . """"The name was coined early in the 1990s shortly after knowlege of Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto became well known to the North American general public"""". I can't quite put my finger on why, but I suspect one or two of the North American general public had heard of Communism before that. (Apparently there were these countries called Russia and China. I believe the public could conceivably have heard of Cuba and Vietnam, too.) Zero Ghits on the http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22Anarchy+and+Peace%22+%22george+wattson%22&btnG=Search&meta= alleged book governing this """"movement"""", unsurprisingly""" Deletion of Peaceful Anarchism WP:BOLLOCKS Wikipedia:Complete bollocks 62 +1991 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Mitchell (2nd nomination) User:Delta13C 09:09, 6 January 2016 (UTC) keep The guy passes GNG and BLP given the good coverage. The article also appears to already be de-|fringed, but a bit more may be in order Deletion of Jonathan Mitchell (2nd nomination) WP:FRINGE Wikipedia:Fringe theories 44 +1992 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neha Thirani Bagri User:onel5969 13:05, 19 January 2016 (UTC) delete searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show that this person passes Deletion of Neha Thirani Bagri WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1993 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nightlife in Canberra User:Mattinbgn 12:01, 15 June 2007 (UTC) delete Not sure how this article can be written without breaching and/or with the selection of venues etc. It is not a topic that lends itself to inclusion in Wikipedia, given Wikipedia policies and guidelines Deletion of Nightlife in Canberra WP:NPOV||WP:OR Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +1994 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logan Grove User:Eggishorn 19:31, 5 January 2014 (UTC) delete """U|JamesBWatson}} has ably summarized the lack of |general notability, so I agree that is the only hope for this article. As far as I can tall, however, the subject has not had """"''significant'' roles in ''multiple''...productions"""". The only significant role he has had was as the voice of the protagonist in ''The Amazing World of Gumball'', a role he no longer has. His other roles were all quite minor""" Deletion of Logan Grove WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1995 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engelbertha Stroebele User:JohnCD 17:12, 3 August 2013 (UTC) delete """The only notability asserted is her supposed Krupp parentage, and the sourcing for that is dubious, to put it mildly. """"''Caroline Marchuck, telephone conversation with author''"""" and """"''A total of 15 """"revelations"""" passed down through six relatives within the Stroebele family''"""" are not the |reliable, published sources required by erifiability. The principal author, user {{user|Dstrob}}, identifies himself as David Stroebel, descendant of the subject, author of the book cited, and Founder, Chairman and CEO of the http://www.engelberthakruppfoundation.org/ """"Engelbertha Krupp Foundation"""": this gives him a severe |conflict of interest. The sections """"Impact of banishment"""" and """"Discovery of photograph"""" are pure speculation and |original research""" Deletion of Engelbertha Stroebele WP:RS||WP:V||WP:COI||WP:OR Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +1996 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Watch the Throne (2nd nomination) User:Hongkongresident 00:06, 21 November 2010 (UTC) merge into Kanye West. |Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. The article will merit its own article when it's released Deletion of Watch the Throne (2nd nomination) WP:BALL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +1997 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nickelodeon Original Movies User:Jayron32 05:26, 1 November 2007 (UTC) keep meets requirements of guideline. I see no reason to delete beyond , which isn't really a valid, guideline-based or policy-based reason Deletion of Nickelodeon Original Movies WP:LIST||WP:IDONTLIKEIT Wikipedia:Lists 36 +1998 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omaha, NE (Comic) User:ST47 11:42, 20 August 2006 (UTC) delete as per and Deletion of Omaha, NE (Comic) WP:NN||WP:NFT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +1999 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magnus Blaze User:Scarian 17:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC) delete fails and until 's can be found to prove otherwise Deletion of Magnus Blaze WP:BAND||WP:MUSIC||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2000 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Jones (Date Movie) User:JuJube 01:10, 16 March 2008 (UTC) delete per ... oh wait, that's not valid criteria. Well it should be... completely non-notable character Deletion of Julia Jones (Date Movie) WP:WHOCARES Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +2001 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renuka David User:Anupmehra 02:05, 22 November 2016 (UTC) delete It is a pure advertisement. However, that is not only problem. The bigger issue is that she has not received '|significant' coverage in |reliable sources. I'm seeing only http://searchindiannews.in/search.html?query=%22Renuka%20David%22#&gsc.q=%22Renuka%20David%22&gsc.page=1 trivial coverage of her in reliable sources Deletion of Renuka David WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2002 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American IronHorse NONE NONE delete Hardly the global coverage you would expect to establish notability for a manufacturer, which is the usual standard that applies to other manufacturing articles. All the references in the article are routine annoucements, which fail . Looking at the references above, most which are again hyper-local to the area, furthest away in Savannah in Georgia. Taking each one in turn Deletion of American IronHorse WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2003 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabble of Devilkin User:Shooterwalker 23:25, 2 June 2010 (UTC) merge and '''redirect''' to Lord of the Nine Hells. No sources to meet but could fit in another article in the mean time Deletion of Rabble of Devilkin WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2004 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayman Kiani User:GiantSnowman 17:32, 2 June 2015 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Ayman Kiani WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2005 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IQ by race User:ScienceApologist 19:05, 22 January 2007 (UTC) delete This article is definitely assuming a POV straight off the bat (that race and intelligence comeasurement are reportable correlations). Since race is mostly sociological while intelligence is entirely psychometric, such an article is either entirely |original research or it is POV-pushing a conservative racial agenda ala ''The Bell Curve Deletion of IQ by race WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2006 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karlie's Kookies User:The 13:18, 13 September 2018 (UTC) merge whatever can be salvaged, certainly selecting only from what's |sourced, into Milk Bar (bakery). No independent notability: strictly |brand love Deletion of Karlie's Kookies WP:V||WP:PROMO Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2007 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locaid User:K 05:04, 24 August 2017 (UTC) delete fails for lack of significant coverage. A redirect is unnecessary as the target article does not look to be notable itself, and the term is unlikely to be a valid search term Deletion of Locaid WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2008 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Fang User:KidAd 02:20, 20 December 2020 (UTC) delete Clear example of . Redirect pertinent content to the pages of politicians she was affiliated with Deletion of Christine Fang WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +2009 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Four Quarters Magazine [[User talk:122.162.52.204|talk]]) 17:19, 27 December 2013 (UTC) keep check out the search results in google scholar (http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22The+Four+Quarters+Magazine%22) for |notability — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/122.162.52.204|122.162.52.204 Deletion of The Four Quarters Magazine WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2010 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Society of the Eternal Rulers User:JzG 12:30, 20 January 2006 (UTC) delete although I can't work out whether it is |complete bollocks or just profoundly un-notable Deletion of Society of the Eternal Rulers WP:BALLS Wikipedia:Complete bollocks 62 +2011 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of common phrases in various languages (second nomination) User:Wikipediatrix 18:57, 31 August 2006 (UTC) delete Violates in multiple ways. And indeed, the 'keep' voters are not providing policy/guideline-based reasoning for their positions Deletion of List of common phrases in various languages (second nomination) WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2012 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Scott User:Captain 00:19, 12 May 2006 (UTC) keep Are all of these really good faith nominations? I don't believe they are. At best, I think we're well in territory; at worst, this smacks of vandalism Deletion of Greg Scott WP:POINT Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +2013 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fineberg Mushrooms User:Dhartung 06:34, 20 December 2007 (UTC) delete fails , and I hope this is a hoax. If it weren't one it probably would have been a major issue for the vendor Deletion of Fineberg Mushrooms WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2014 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Princess User:Poeloq 00:32, 15 January 2008 (UTC) delete fails notability guidelines at usic Deletion of Dark Princess WP:M Wikipedia:Mediation 70 +2015 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Short User:Nasty 23:35, 15 October 2020 (UTC) keep and '''Edit''' The subject is notable in his field and the article does meet . The existing references from BBC are . It needs further improvement in terms of content and references per and . A few notable references that can be added include the following: https://qz.com/645382/inside-the-studio-of-the-micro-engraver-who-works-between-heartbeats-to-keep-his-hand-steady/ Quartz,https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/five-pound-note-plastic-worth-50-000-engrave-jane-austen-winston-churchill-a7459171.html The Indepdendent,https://www.birminghamlocal.tv/videos/graham-short-has-just-completed-his-most-difficult-project-x7vb258/ Birmingham TV, http://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/4762432 Digital Journal, https://www.arthousescotland.com/blog/graham-short-thh-gallery-collaborate/ Art House Scotland. Unsourced information can be removed and replaced with information from the above references Deletion of Graham Short WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:CCPOL||WP:MOS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2016 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael David Crawford User:Dreadstar 02:09, 12 October 2007 (UTC) delete non-notable per , no non-trivial coverage by reliable secondary sources. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Michael+David+Crawford%22 Google search returns few secondary independent sources Deletion of Michael David Crawford WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2017 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. Dale Newton User:Ozgod 17:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC) delete Article (lacking references) appears to be a non-|notable biography Deletion of M. Dale Newton WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2018 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Washington Middle School Shooting User:Netherzone 14:18, 24 August 2021 (UTC) delete This school shooting was a tragic incident of senseless gun violence. However wikipedia is not a newspaper , and the event at this time does not pass notability criteria for an article. If it has an impact in the future on changing school policies within a wider net, or the specific event continues to have ongoing news coverage then an article may be appropriate in the future. Sad as it is to read about these awful shool shootings, especially with 13 year olds involved, we can't include each one as a separate article. It could however be added to the article List of school shootings in the United States along with associated citations Deletion of 2021 Washington Middle School Shooting WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2019 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the best-selling boy bands in Asia [[User talk:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars|Talk to me]] 05:36, 8 September 2015 (UTC) delete The sources used do not have subentries for boy bands or girl groups or other type of genre, just a combined synthesis of sourced information, which makes this . --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Deletion of List of the best-selling boy bands in Asia WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2020 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rock paper User:The 23:06, 13 September 2008 (UTC) delete as joke article, per Deletion of Rock paper WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +2021 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Democrat Party (phrase) User:Cazort 22:16, 5 March 2009 (UTC) keep This article is very well-sourced and I'm a bit surprised to see such an extensive and well-sourced article proposed for deletion. Some of the sources are written specifically about this topic (as in written about the phrase/term itself). That certainly meets the otability criteria Deletion of Democrat Party (phrase) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2022 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiang Shen (Debbie) User:Bakazaka 23:48, 31 March 2019 (UTC) merge to Super Impassioned Net Generation. Subject is not independently notable, but readers searching for the name might find it useful to be directed to the group of which the subject is a member, so redirect per -R Deletion of Jiang Shen (Debbie) WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +2023 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of video game consoles (eighth generation) (3rd nomination) User:Mattyatty 17:23, 27 March 2007 (UTC) keep Normaly i am opposed to articles like this, but this one seems to be well sourced, with only a few speculative claims (which i plan on removing in a minute). I have had a breif read of and in my eyes, this article doesnt appear to break it. —The preceding Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned comment was added by Deletion of History of video game consoles (eighth generation) (3rd nomination) WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2024 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Kamin User:RightCowLeftCoast 04:53, 12 August 2012 (UTC) merge to Afghan detainees at Guantanamo Bay. No significant coverage of the individual, from what I have searched in possible |reliable sources appear to be found for the subject to pass . There are multiple mentions of the subject in relation to the subject's detention, and the ongoing interaction of the subject with the judicial process at Guantanamo Naval Base however the coverage has been more about those two events than the subject of the biography article; therefore, it is my opinion that the subject does not pass or . That being said the subject is a member of a notable group, and therefore a redirect can be made to said notable group Deletion of Mohammed Kamin WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:SOLDIER Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2025 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew K. Ruotolo (2nd nomination) User:E 19:12, 14 August 2018 (UTC) keep for pretty much the same reasons editors gave for iVoting to KEEP last winter. And because it reliably sourced and passes Deletion of Andrew K. Ruotolo (2nd nomination) WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2026 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sea Scouts (band) User:Rlendog 18:37, 28 May 2009 (UTC) comment I am not sure if this band meets notability, but it does have a (admittedly sparse) allmusic page, so it is clearly more than just a YouTube band. Ideally, sources can be found. Not sure what effort has been made to find sources per Deletion of Sea Scouts (band) WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +2027 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of software companies in Mumbai User:Starblind 17:02, 4 June 2010 (UTC) delete classic , redlink farm, excessive external links and if it sticks around will attract spammers. We wouldn't want a List of pawn shops in New York either. Bottom line, Wikipedia is not your local yellow pages Deletion of List of software companies in Mumbai WP:NOTDIRECTORY Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2028 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leotask User:Mcmatter 17:41, 8 January 2015 (UTC) delete There is not even a claim to significance for this software, this articles fails both and and there seems to be zero |relibale sources Deletion of Leotask WP:GNG||WP:NSOFT||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2029 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bays, WV User:Smartyllama 12:34, 6 July 2017 (UTC) keep Passes , plain and simple. It's clear it exists, it's clear it was populated, good enough Deletion of Bays, WV WP:GEOLAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2030 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best Practices, LLC User:Bonadea 09:08, 10 July 2015 (UTC) delete fails . Several trivial mentions, some of which are in independent sources, but no significant coverage. The only source that might possibly qualify as non-trivial is the inc.com case study from 2001, but I don't think that cuts it on its own. The company's website has been repeatedly spammed to various Wikipedia articles for the last couple of years, so it does seem as if they have tried to use Wikipedia as an advertising platform Deletion of Best Practices, LLC WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2031 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoom Vacations User:TonyTheTiger 01:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC) keep I think the point of is that there needs to be a way to account for subjects that have enough non-trivial coverage to amount to substantial coverage. rules out non-notable awards as passing mentions that amount to trivial coverage. However, if we deem these awards to be notable in the field, then the subject probably passes BASIC Deletion of Zoom Vacations WP:BASIC||WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2032 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret Gel User:discospinster 15:04, 9 July 2021 (UTC) delete """As I said in the proposed deletion: """"No indication of notability per or . The sources provided are not ''about'' her, but she is only mentioned. I am unable to find multiple reliable sources with significant discussion of the individual""" Deletion of Margaret Gel WP:BIO||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2033 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Yahya Waliullah User:Visviva 08:59, 7 December 2006 (UTC) delete per nom; does not appear to meet Deletion of Muhammad Yahya Waliullah WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2034 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sounds for Energy-efficient Buildings User:JayJasper 18:43, 28 December 2012 (UTC) delete per nom. Lacks significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Fails & Deletion of Sounds for Energy-efficient Buildings WP:GNG||WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2035 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wink (game) User:The 00:16, 29 October 2011 (UTC) delete WP:ITEXISTS, but |WP:ITFAILSTHEGNG Deletion of Wink (game) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2036 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SupaCrankIt User:Northamerica1000 05:21, 15 June 2017 (UTC) delete Not finding any coverage in reliable sources at this time; does not meet Deletion of SupaCrankIt WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2037 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southern Region of the Black Law Students Association (SRBLSA) User:Jamesontai 18:00, 13 April 2008 (UTC) delete This organization fails in additional to 's notes on student organizations that span only one university Deletion of Southern Region of the Black Law Students Association (SRBLSA) WP:ORG||WP:UNIGUIDE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2038 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerry Chamberlain User:Xxanthippe 00:51, 20 January 2011 (UTC) keep GS cites give h index of 24. This is enough to meet rof#C1 Deletion of Kerry Chamberlain WP:P Wikipedia:Portal 50 +2039 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Politics in the British Isles User:BrownHairedGirl 13:28, 27 May 2012 (UTC) delete """This piece is yet another y creation by KarlB, a |synthesis of disparate topics created in furtherance of his campaign to construct the notion of a common polity across the so-called British Isles, and designed to serve as a head article for his self-created :Category:Politics of the British Isles. The topics covered are primarily a hybrid of 1) A fork of Ireland–United Kingdom relations, and 2) a description of government structures and international relations in the islands. Neither aspect is best described as """"politics"""".There may be some content in here which could be re-used in neutrally-focused articles, so I would be happy for the page to be userified""" Deletion of Politics in the British Isles WP:POINT||WP:SYN Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +2040 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegra Versace User:Cavarrone 07:01, 1 August 2012 (UTC) keep as she is the major shareholder in the Gianni Versace S.p.A. company, a point that overcome any concern. Furthermore, she appears to pass WP:BASIC and WP:GNG being subject of multiple published reliable, independent, secondary sources Deletion of Allegra Versace WP:NOTINHERITED Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +2041 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exa Web Solutions User:Xanchester 08:54, 25 October 2012 (UTC) delete No significant coverage by |reliable secondary sources outside of press releases. The subject fails to meet the |general notability guideline and the |notability guideline for organisations Deletion of Exa Web Solutions WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:ORG Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2042 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uday Narayan User:Nirmaljoshi 06:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC) delete for now. None of the source quoted in the article is reliable. But when I did searched web, his name appeared multiple times. Probably he may pass if sources are corrected. May be more sources are available in Bhojpuri language Deletion of Uday Narayan WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2043 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Warcraft locations (2nd nomination) User:onel5969 12:07, 27 December 2017 (UTC) delete complete , full of Deletion of List of Warcraft locations (2nd nomination) WP:GAMECRUFT||WP:OR Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +2044 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Totally Insured User:AllyD 16:19, 1 June 2020 (UTC) delete There is little aside from the coverage of the launch and pricing of the firm's policy aimed at people with HIV, and an in-role quotation from the company spokesman about cover for people living with cancer https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/insurance/2948555/Insurers-deny-cover-to-cancer-sufferers.html. The firm co-launched a TIG Impaired line with MorganAsh in 2009 https://www.morganash.com/about/news/totally-insured-group-and-morganash-co-launches-impaired-risk-service but the regulator's listing page indicates that the firm ceased to be authorised around a year later https://register.fca.org.uk/ShPo_FirmDetailsPage?id=001b000000MfSkFAAV. I am not seeing the |coverage about the company needed for |notability Deletion of Totally Insured :WP:RS||:WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2045 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joaquin Garay User:Atlantic306 19:31, 18 February 2020 (UTC) keep as per the reliable sources identified above that show that asic is passed in my view, the museum reference is particularly convincing, imv Deletion of Joaquin Garay WP:B Wikipedia:Bots 91 +2046 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to use iPhone Remote outside of your local network User:Majoreditor 04:54, 25 November 2007 (UTC) delete per Deletion of How to use iPhone Remote outside of your local network WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2047 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DIIA User:Mduvekot 22:59, 6 April 2016 (UTC) delete per high probability (96.1%) that article is a copyvio according to http://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=&oldid=287186664&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0 Earwig's Copyvio Detector Deletion of DIIA WP:G12 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +2048 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South 40 User:Esradekan 11:57, 29 March 2008 (UTC) delete article fails to establish notability as per Deletion of South 40 WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2049 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Schwartz (3rd nomination) User:Bearian 21:17, 23 October 2020 (UTC) delete per . He may be a mover and shaker, and up and coming, but has not had significant coverage in reliable sources. The ''Forbes'' pages do not count towards notability Deletion of Adam Schwartz (3rd nomination) WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2050 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nedaphadrimeru User:Shooterwalker 23:17, 17 September 2012 (UTC) delete same here. Couldn't find any third party sources to , as required by the general notability guideline Deletion of Nedaphadrimeru WP:verify notability Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2051 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Parker User:Kittybrewster 08:59, 27 February 2011 (UTC) delete Unsuccessful political candidate who fails and Deletion of Star Parker WP:POLITICIAN||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2052 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asami Sato (2nd nomination) User:Tutelary 03:55, 3 January 2015 (UTC) delete or '''Redirect'''. This article should not have been created, and qualifies under speedy deletion criterion . The character is not notable outside of Legend of Korra and as a result does not stand to have a standalone article. Whatever content that is mergable should be merged to respectable articles Deletion of Asami Sato (2nd nomination) WP:G4 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +2053 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Crilly User:ImmortalWizard 18:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC) delete Fails . '''THE NEW Deletion of Martin Crilly WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2054 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StrategyWiki User:Charlene 15:46, 6 January 2007 (UTC) delete No assertion of notability. No third-party |reliable sources. Doesn't appear to meet any of the criteria set out in Deletion of StrategyWiki WP:RS||WP:WEB Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2055 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hijire Anze User:JamesBurns 06:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC) delete insufficient 3rd party sources Deletion of Hijire Anze WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2056 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computer Systems Odessa User:Coredesat 01:09, 15 June 2006 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Computer Systems Odessa WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2057 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chen Guanrong User:David 18:16, 20 October 2012 (UTC) keep """He passes multiple criteria: #C1 for his highly cited papers (e.g. 1626 Google scholar cites for """"From Chaos to Order"""", 1297 for """"Yet another chaotic attractor"""", 964 for """"Kalman filtering""""), #C3 as an IEEE Fellow, plausibly #C5 as argued above, and #C8 as editor-in-chief of IEEE Circuits and Systems (a major journal; he is also EIC of the International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos but I'm not sure whether that is as significant""" Deletion of Chen Guanrong WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2058 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chanchal Kumar Sharma User:David 05:28, 23 June 2012 (UTC) delete The citation record doesn't support a pass of #C1, and I'm not convinced of any other criterion. Most of the sources in the article are primary; there are a few reliable newspaper stories but they all mention him only trivially, so the evidence for is also lacking Deletion of Chanchal Kumar Sharma WP:PROF||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2059 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teamlorio.net User:AmitDeshwar 01:11, 26 September 2006 (UTC) keep It meets so lets keep it. I agree that simply hosting your webpage on Newsgrounds is not signifigant but thate fact that it has been on the front page and given awards suggests that it is in fact notable. Evidence of those things should be presented though Deletion of Teamlorio.net WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2060 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermione Corfield User:Bearian 00:45, 24 March 2015 (UTC) delete or ''userfy'' per Deletion of Hermione Corfield WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +2061 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rose Van Thyn User:Smmurphy 19:17, 17 August 2017 (UTC) keep """passes , , . I don't think non-local coverage is a requirement in . As for N, ICTIM states, """" The historic significance is indicated by persistent coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources that devote significant attention to the individual's role"""", Thyn received persistent coverage from at least three newspapers small Louisiana newspapers (Shreveport Times, Alexandria Town Talk, Monroe News-Star per https://www.newspapers.com/search/#query=%22Rose+Van+Thyn%22). Note that newspapers.com isn't exhaustive of Louisianan newspapers, for instance neither the NO Advocate nor contemporary issues of the NO Times-Picayune are indexed (the two largest papers in NO. As a |creative professional (giving talks on her life), there is not a strong case, but her talk is kept at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum and reviewed in those three papers. As for GNG, independent sources seems sufficient""" Deletion of Rose Van Thyn WP:NPOV||WP:NOR||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:VICTIM||WP:CREATIVE Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +2062 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of simulation typefaces (2nd nomination) User:Alpha3031 05:58, 19 March 2019 (UTC) merge to List of typefaces#Simulation/Mimicry fonts and Simulation typeface to Typeface#Ethnic typefaces (merging some things if necessary). I don't really think there's enough coverage of simulation typefaces for a full standalone article, but it's already covered at those two articles, meaning there is an appropriate redirect target where it can be covered according to .{{pb}}{{pb}}(if there is enough content for a standalone article, I'd suggest a '''move''' to simulation typeface as suggested by {{noping|Nabla}} and '''reverse merge''' Typeface#Ethnic typefaces Deletion of List of simulation typefaces (2nd nomination) WP:DUE Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +2063 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicola Tappenden (2nd nomination) [[User:(aeropagitica)|''' (aeropagitica) ''']] 16:01, 27 February 2006 (UTC) delete Just as non-notable the second time around. No evidence of notability supplied to change previous vote, refers Deletion of Nicola Tappenden (2nd nomination) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2064 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Cunningham User:AlexTiefling 15:56, 7 October 2008 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Craig Cunningham WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2065 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Agonist User:Soundvisions1 18:06, 14 November 2008 (UTC) delete """This one is tough. So far there is only one release on one of the more notable indy metal labels so the band do not meet criteria |Criteria for musicians and ensembles, criteria number 5 yet. Because of the singer being a contestant on Canadian Idol there is a perceived notability going on that might help the band squeak by |Criteria for musicians and ensembles, criteria number 6, however outside of Canada and outside of bloggers and message boards there is not much coverage as the singer did not go that far in the competition. I can find sources that are '''not''' allowed per |Criteria for musicians and ensembles, criteria number 1, ''except'', such as press releases and reprints of press releases, bios, user submitted news and trivial mentions of the band on blogs because of Canadian Idol, but not any articles on the band as a whole that would come across as """"Significant coverage"""" as defined at the |general notability guidelines""" Deletion of The Agonist WP:MUSICBIO||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2066 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reception of the iPad User:Barts1a 02:42, 14 March 2012 (UTC) keep """Nominator's argument is an advanced form of the |""""I don't like it, therefore delete"""" argument with several words added to pad it and make it sound like it's not said argument""" Deletion of Reception of the iPad WP:IDONTLIKEIT Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +2067 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rival (Rapper) User:BlinkingBlimey 15:13, 27 January 2008 (UTC) delete Why isn't this speedy? Doesn't come close to notability as per . No independent sources (). Of course, when the promised album is released things might change and the page can be recreated. Until then it's just a vanity page that has no place on Wikipedia Deletion of Rival (Rapper) WP:MUSIC||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2068 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margot Rose User:MichaelQSchmidt 10:44, 15 February 2010 (UTC) keep per 30-year career in film and television adequately meeting http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0741558/filmoyear. Yes, the article could use cleanup, expansion and further sourcing, but surmountable issues are no reason to delete Deletion of Margot Rose WP:ENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2069 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magomed Magomedkerimov User:Newshunter12 09:34, 25 June 2019 (UTC) delete Fails since he has never had a top tier fight. All the sources are coverage and not sustained , so the article also fails Deletion of Magomed Magomedkerimov WP:NMMA||WP:ROUTINE||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2070 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Donnellan User:Rms125a 14:19, 29 May 2016 (UTC) delete as |insufficiently notable actor; possibly |too soon Deletion of Sean Donnellan WP:NACTOR||WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2071 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil good User:Charlene 19:41, 17 July 2007 (UTC) delete No references, unattributed and (after Google searches) likely unattributable. At best, both expressions fail and Deletion of Phil good WP:NEO||WP:ATT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +2072 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people with coronavirus disease 2019 User:Muboshgu 14:37, 13 March 2020 (UTC) delete per and . Almost half of the world's population is expected to contract COVID-19. This is not at all a defining characteristic that would make for a notable topic for a list. –  Deletion of List of people with coronavirus disease 2019 WP:NOTDIR||WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2073 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullah Sallum Abdullah User:ARoseWolf 13:19, 3 June 2021 (UTC) comment Why is a search coming back with Abdullah Sallu''o''m Abdullah? Perhaps a mispelling? Like with the other AfD, I can't find much on the individual and nothing in-depth. If allows us to keep subjects that you can't find reliable biographical information on beyond two sentences then maybe there is an issue with the way NPOL is written. I digress, that's another issue for another time. Fails , , and pretty much every other guideline surrounding notability but passes so I guess the subject gets a golden ticket Deletion of Abdullah Sallum Abdullah WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:N||WP:V||WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2074 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tough Love: Controversial Methods for the Rehabilitation of Problem Children User:Coredesat 02:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC) delete per nom and Deletion of Tough Love: Controversial Methods for the Rehabilitation of Problem Children WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2075 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Colcord User:Mdtemp 14:18, 28 June 2016 (UTC) delete No significant independent coverage to meet Deletion of Michael Colcord WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2076 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Walter User:Tomwsulcer 23:01, 20 November 2014 (UTC) delete My sweeps turn up nada, US news, international, entertainment-related, subject doesn't meet the Deletion of Amber Walter WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2077 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leila J. Rupp User:Vartanza 06:59, 22 January 2010 (UTC) keep Clearly meets Deletion of Leila J. Rupp WP:ACADEMIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2078 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boar (Thomas Harris) User:Dhartung 20:54, 13 January 2007 (UTC) merge with Hannibal (novel) per Deletion of Boar (Thomas Harris) WP:FICT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2079 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional characters who can manipulate wind User:Sesshomaru 22:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC) delete per #INFO Deletion of List of fictional characters who can manipulate wind WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2080 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Gunnarsson User:Alvaldi 20:02, 16 April 2021 (UTC) delete Fails . Passing means the subject is likely to pass GNG but there still has to be on him to pass it. A Google search turned up nothing and his Swedish article only has links to trivial sources or database sites Deletion of Erik Gunnarsson WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2081 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Jenkins (fighter) User:LlamaAl 17:41, 27 April 2013 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Paul Jenkins (fighter) WP:GNG||WP:NMMA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2082 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Britton User:Enos733 05:27, 25 April 2013 (UTC) delete I Only three of the sources cited in the article appear to be about the subject (all in relationship to an election). The Los Angeles Times did not cover his run in 1989, and did run a short bio in 2004 http://articles.latimes.com/2003/aug/16/local/me-bios16. My sense is that the subject has not been covered by multiple sources in a significant manner. The subject does not meet Deletion of Joel Britton WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2083 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro-Life (politician) User:Hrafn 01:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC) delete """this minor (and to date electorally unsuccessful) politician received ''temporary'' attention due to his bizarre name-changes, but #Notability is not temporary|""""notability is not temporary"""", and he is not otherwise notable per #Politicians""" Deletion of Pro-Life (politician) WP:NOTE||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2084 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Bee User:AllyD 06:32, 11 July 2015 (UTC) delete No |evidence found from searches on Google, Highbeam, Questia or Guardian that this firm has attained |notability Deletion of Blue Bee :WP:RS||:WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2085 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blane Covert User:Nilfanion 13:19, 1 October 2006 (UTC) delete both. An unpublished book might be notable if sufficiently important, but a collection of literature by a nn author? The author isn't yet notable and the book article is #Wikipedia is not a crystal ball|crystal balling even if it is verifiable, after all who knows what will happen in editing Deletion of Blane Covert WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2086 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of items and artifacts in Negima User:TheFarix 02:20, 6 April 2009 (UTC) delete as excessive level of plot detail which falls under |indiscriminate information. Information about the Pactio Artifacts could be included in the character's descriptions. But beyond that, a list of chapters is a better way to summarize plot information Deletion of List of items and artifacts in Negima WP:IINFO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2087 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alodia Almira Gosiengfiao (2nd nomination) User:TheFarix 02:36, 22 June 2007 (UTC) delete I was not exactly sure how to comment on this, but I will have to go with . Not much of the information is verifiable through reliable third-party sources. Instead, the bulk of it cites a primary source, her deviantART account. This gives the article a vanity feeling. Also the only third-party source for the entire article is a blog entry for the Maxim offer. Blogs are generally not considered |reliable sources Deletion of Alodia Almira Gosiengfiao (2nd nomination) WP:BLP||WP:RS Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +2088 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eggel (Egg Bagel) User:Northamerica1000 19:58, 9 May 2016 (UTC) delete Interesting idea, but the topic has received no (very little) coverage in reliable sources. Epic fail Deletion of Eggel (Egg Bagel) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2089 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. Nicholson User:Hawkeye7 08:02, 20 July 2013 (UTC) keep Lieutenant generals are presumed notable per Deletion of R. Nicholson WP:SOLDIER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2090 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trackle User:Septrillion 05:25, 9 May 2018 (UTC) keep passes Deletion of Trackle WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2091 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grant Bartholomaeus User:Doctorhawkes 01:09, 12 May 2014 (UTC) keep Meets Deletion of Grant Bartholomaeus WP:NAFL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2092 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation User:JimMillerJr 18:15, 4 November 2009 (UTC) keep I have found, and added, several news sources discussing this foundation. Clearly passes due to extensive news coverage over the past 16 years Deletion of Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2093 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Football at the 2018 CJSOI Games User:CeltJungleSnake 15:38, 9 May 2021 (UTC) delete no evidence of notability, fails Deletion of Football at the 2018 CJSOI Games WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2094 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Benoit and Dean Malenko User:Theophilus75 18:39, 18 June 2007 (UTC) comment It's not just about having one source, it's about having sources that are considered that meet the criteria of proving . If that one source now listed did that, then I'd be thrilled (it would make our lives a whole lot easier in the pro-wrestling project). What would be even harder with this article though, is to find a that meets that shows that ''this'' article needs to exist, and not an article about the Triple Threat, Four Horsemen (professional wrestling)|The Four Horsemen and The Radicalz Deletion of Chris Benoit and Dean Malenko WP:RS||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:V Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2095 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomáš Bučič User:INeedSupport 16:35, 10 May 2019 (UTC) delete Agree with OP. Fails on all categories Deletion of Tomáš Bučič WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2096 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Jensen (musician) (2nd nomination) User:Nnadigoodluck 20:50, 18 October 2020 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Adam Jensen (musician) (2nd nomination) WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2097 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irish E-Sports User:Nifboy 15:59, 12 October 2008 (UTC) delete """WP:Notability has a specialized meaning on Wikipedia. It's not notability in the dictionary sense, but rather something to the effect of """"We don't have decent sources, therefore we can't write a decent (read:erifiability|verifiable) article, therefore we shouldn't bother having an article"""". And that's pretty much the case here""" Deletion of Irish E-Sports WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2098 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rumours and conspiracy theories about the July 2005 London bombings User:Morton_devonshire 20:37, 7 November 2006 (UTC) delete Fails to cite to reliable sources meeting Wikipedia’s requirements under , and is mostly original research violating . Further, Wikipedia prohibits http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/#Synthesis_of_published_material_serving_to_advance_a_position “Synthesis of published material serving to advance a position”. This article is a cruft-swamp-magnet. Image:Matt_Devonshire2.jpg|20px Deletion of Rumours and conspiracy theories about the July 2005 London bombings WP:RS||WP:NOR Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2099 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McDonald's rap User:JBsupreme 09:13, 18 December 2009 (UTC) delete Interesting arguments put forth by the nominator, but I'm endorsing deletion for a different reason: Deletion of McDonald's rap WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2100 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piraya Film User:Gleeanon409 19:49, 21 October 2020 (UTC) comment HighKing, I think is the guideline for this subject Deletion of Piraya Film WP:NORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2101 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamia Fatimatuzzahra Napa User:Cordless 07:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC) delete a search doesn't reveal anything other than a Facebook page, so fails Deletion of Jamia Fatimatuzzahra Napa WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2102 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fisherman's Granddaughter User:Whiteguru 11:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC) keep as per above, it is important to have some examples of silent films. Historicity and the research given here satisfies Deletion of The Fisherman's Granddaughter WP:NFSOURCES Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2103 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Monohull Open Classes Association User:Amisom 13:47, 19 January 2017 (UTC) keep per sources uncovered by {{user|Exemplo347}}. If they exist, then the subject meets the whether or not they are currently incorporated into the article: see eg. . Also a little perturbed by the sniping from {{ping|Tavix}}: we're all here to deliberate and discuss, let's cool it a bit Deletion of International Monohull Open Classes Association WP:GNG||WP:NOIMPROVEMENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2104 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Port Kaituma airstrip shootings User:Somno 10:21, 13 March 2009 (UTC) delete content is already covered in Jonestown. Article was not |spun out correctly (no attribution under GFDL and the section in Jonestown was not summarised). Jonestown is a big article and summarising might be appropriate for certain sections, but there should be discussion on the talk page about which sections to spin out and the content should be split properly Deletion of Port Kaituma airstrip shootings WP:SPINOUT Wikipedia:Article size 3 +2105 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perunika User:Esradekan 00:03, 18 May 2008 (UTC) delete WP:MUSIC & Deletion of Perunika WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +2106 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Newcomers (film) User:Donaldd23 21:33, 7 July 2020 (UTC) keep """I found a review online https://theskykid.com/the-newcomers-2000/, but not sure if the source is considered """"reliable"""". It does meet the """"independent"""" criteria of reviews. Even if that doesn't count, I believe that this film meets the """"Inclusionary criteria"""" of under the following criteria, which states, """"The film features significant involvement (i.e., one of the most important roles in the making of the film) by a notable person and is a major part of his/her career."""" This is the film debut of Chris Evans, a now well-known actor (Captain America). To remove an acting debut of a successful person just because they weren't known at the time, or the film had only a limited release would mean that films such as ''Three Rooms in Manhattan'' (Robert De Niro), ''Las Vegas Nights'' (Frank Sinatra), ''Can I Do It... 'Til I Need Glasses?'' (Robin Williams), and ''Another Nice Mess'' (Steve Martin) would also need to be removed as they are all pretty much non-notable films, except for the fact that the individuals appeared in them and they went on to have huge careers. Add in the fact that Evan's role in the film was much larger than any of the other actor's debut performances""" Deletion of The Newcomers (film) WP:NFO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2107 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shintaro Yamada User:Dragquennom 17:55, 20 April 2011 (UTC) keep meets , reliable sources were found Deletion of Shintaro Yamada WP:ENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2108 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonio Núñez López User:onel5969 12:00, 3 August 2018 (UTC) delete As nom pointed out, searching is difficult due to the prominence of the notable Marco Antonio Núñez López, who interestingly doesn't have an article. He doesn't quite pass the threshold of notability. His one book, ''Storytelling in a Week'' might be notable, but I don't think any of his other works are. Fails and Deletion of Antonio Núñez López WP:GNG||WP:NAUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2109 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Kershaw User:Dacium 07:05, 23 February 2007 (UTC) delete """Still don't see notibility or any media coverage that isn't focused on the that field """"senior instructor of Shotokan Karate International of Great Britain"""" seems to be the only claim for notibility. Not enough to pass """ Deletion of Dave Kershaw WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2110 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rum Babas User:SorryGuy 02:38, 10 February 2008 (UTC) delete Some references that are non-reliable and can not be cited exist, which leads me to believe that this is not a hoax. However, if you look at the ARIA list of award nominations (http://www.ariaawards.com.au/history-by-award.php?awardID=15), you can see that for 1990 and 1991 the list of nominees is not present, only the winners are listed. So while I think it is possible that the band meets , with no references present, it definitely does not meet , unless someone has an old newspaper or such Deletion of Rum Babas WP:MUSIC||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2111 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley McGirr User:AusLondonder 22:05, 11 November 2015 (UTC) delete Fails and also . Promotional article Deletion of Bradley McGirr WP:POLITICIAN||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2112 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EP3 (Basement Jaxx EP) User:Davey2010 NONE merge """as {{User|Davey2010}} pointed out. and are not met in this particular case, and the sources given by {{User|IamM1rv}} are either directory listings or mentions of the band. Furthermore, this nomination has been applied to the following AfDs, as well (instead of having them all be on a nice, single AfD), and the same arguments and rationales are pretty much being shared by the same participants (e.g., people arguing """"keep"""" because they're assuming that the albums inherit the band's notability""" Deletion of EP3 (Basement Jaxx EP) WP:NALBUM||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2113 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fictional portrayals of the Japan Self-Defense Forces User:Mangojuice 13:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC) delete as |trivia Deletion of Fictional portrayals of the Japan Self-Defense Forces WP:TRIV Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +2114 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo Maisnik User:Toughpigs 23:23, 21 June 2020 (UTC) keep Here's https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/features/la-billboard-diva-angelyne-bemoans-812987 coverage in The Hollywood Reporter. Per , the article should be retained and improved Deletion of Hugo Maisnik WP:NEXIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2115 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Customary stone user:Andrew 12:49, 3 February 2015 (UTC) merge into stone (unit). As explained at that article, there were a large variety of stone weights used through Europe and the UK. The ''customary stone'' here was a popular weight used by butchers which was 8 pounds of meat or cheese. This appeared in tables of weights and measures in works such as https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=TUMsAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA423 Whitaker's Almanac, where it was contrasted with the legal stone of 14 pounds, which was commonly known as the ''horseman's weight'' because it was used to weigh jockeys in handicap races. tells us to bring topics together by their meaning and the stone (unit) page seems to be best place to cover all this Deletion of Customary stone WP:DICDEF Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +2116 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russia investigation origins conspiracy theory User:Jdcomix 22:18, 21 October 2019 (UTC) comment I just noticed that the article was renamed to Russia investigation origins counter-narrative. However, one of the new sources for the new name is completely unrelated to the article subject, although the CNN video is pretty solid. If the issues that I mentioned above are addressed and there are more sources that are as solid as this one, yet the article is still deleted, I'm completely in favor of |blowing it up and starting from scratch to make the article more concise Deletion of Russia investigation origins conspiracy theory WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +2117 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shallan Meiers User:Morbidthoughts 19:19, 1 May 2011 (UTC) keep Consistent coverage by Las Vegas Review-Journal adds up. No playmatehood exception in the GNG or . Nominator is confusing trivia as the importance of the topic rather than the depth of coverage. See note 6 in Deletion of Shallan Meiers WP:BASIC||WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2118 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One people under one God User:Seraphimblade 18:27, 12 October 2018 (UTC) delete """or if appropriate '''merge and redirect'''. Apologies in advance for the length, there's a lot of sources here to analyze. Analysis of sources is as of this revision: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=One_people_under_one_God&oldid=863735389. #1 is the Huffington Post, which is a relatively partisan source. Especially in the area of politics itself, partisan sources aren't generally reliable. #2 is a brief mention in passing. #3 is just a Bible passage, only very tangentially related. #4 covers it a bit, in context of analysis of Trump's speech in general, but I'm not sure of the reliability of the reference and it's regardless a pretty brief blurb. #5 only mentions in passing. #6 is the American Humanist Association, not particularly reliable and of course will have a clear position on the matter. #7 looks like an internal periodical for a specific organization, unknown reliability and certainly doing nothing for notability. #8 is NPR, certainly highly reliable, but is about the role of religion in his campaign in general and only mentions the specific phrase in passing. #9 is a blog, nothing more to be said there. #10 is RedState, another partisan source, and again those should be treated extremely carefully in terms of reliability on political topics. #11 is again about Trump's campaign and religion in general, with only a passing mention of the particular phrase. #12 is a partisan source (""""liberal bias"""" right in their """"About Us"""" page), so same caveat as before. #13 is the Inquisitr, which an RSN discussion found to be an unreliable source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_240#Inquisitr. #14 is again a brief mention in passing. #15 is a brief mention in passing and only of a passingly ''similar'' phrase, not even the one in question. #16 is just a quotation of the statement as part of a larger quote and isn't even about that portion of his speech. #17 is, again, just quoting it a part of a larger quote, and the article isn't at all addressing that portion of it. This is |reference bombing of every single thing that can be found that mentions the thing in passing, but no number of unreliable sources and passing mentions add up to |notability. This subject isn't notable for a standalone article, and at most should possibly be briefly mentioned in a parent or sibling article""" Deletion of One people under one God WP:REFBOMB||WP:N Wikipedia:Citation overkill 8 +2119 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greeks in Cuba User:Edison 03:07, 4 May 2009 (UTC) delete Wikipedia is |not a directory listing articles with every bilateral combination of persons from country X who live in country Y. A few incidentals in newspapers does not establish that such article are encyclopedic, and the references do not satisfy Deletion of Greeks in Cuba WP:NOT||WP:N Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2120 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Cap Marine Towing and Salvage User:Stalwart111 02:36, 6 August 2014 (UTC) delete """the problem is that the NYTimes article is (quite clearly) from the """"N.Y. / Region"""" section of the paper. It benefits from the rigorous editorial standards of the NYTimes but it is unquestionably local in focus. In that context, the NYTimes is the same as any other local or regional paper covering subjects of interest to locals. It's disingenuous to suggest that local coverage of a local subject is """"international"""" or """"national"""" in that context. The NBC source doesn't even mention the subject - it mentions the owner in the context of an article that couldn't possibly be considered significant coverage of the subject in any context. There's clearly not enough for the subject to pass """ Deletion of White Cap Marine Towing and Salvage WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2121 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelangelo Albertazzi User:Luxic 09:52, 15 May 2010 (UTC) delete obviously fails , even though I must admit he's way more notable than several players that do meet the criteria (but this is not the matter at issue, so Deletion of Michelangelo Albertazzi WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2122 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omar Jimenez User:Abishe 19:24, 5 June 2020 (UTC) keep the subject definitely meets and he was notable even prior to his arrest Deletion of Omar Jimenez WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2123 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ninaro User:Kudpung 07:05, 19 July 2014 (UTC) comment Keep. Private, but there are plenty of private establishments providing mainstream education to A-Level. That its web site is on a free web host is not a concern of ours, not should we be overly concerned about the lack of Internet sources for a school in Sri Lanka. The article is informative and not promotional. Spam links can be contained by regular maintenance users. We have a long-standing precedent for keeping secondary schools as reported at Deletion of Ninaro WP:OUTCOMES Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +2124 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. B. Singh User:Qworty 18:26, 18 January 2011 (UTC) keep His books meet and he himself meets . His entry and the entries about his books appear to have become, from time to time, battlegrounds for POV warring. I am not completely familiar with the arguments used in the edit warring, and will only note that he and his books are notable and that edit warring has no place in the project Deletion of G. B. Singh WP:BK||WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2125 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/222nd Street Bridge User:Paulmcdonald 03:04, 31 January 2013 (UTC) keep """We've gone through this before. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-99 Wamego Bridge for an example of a previous AFD. Bridge articles on highways normally end up being kept as stubs simply because they eventually are proven to pass the |general notability guideline through offline sources, which takes more time. Further, it seems to me that the nominator is going for a bulk deletion -- see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Kansas Avenue Bridge, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lecompton Road Bridge, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-99 Wamego Bridge (2nd nomination) (a second nomination of an AFD already closed as """"keep""""), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-32 Turner Bridge, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morse Street Bridge, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/222nd Street Bridge, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maple Hill Bridge, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paxico Road Bridge, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Highway 2 Bridge""" Deletion of 222nd Street Bridge WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2126 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/And that's a good thing User:HelenDegenerate 00:08, 30 July 2021 (UTC) delete I concur with the nominator-- none of the sources cited actually discussed the phrase, all they did was use the phrase. Fails Deletion of And that's a good thing WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2127 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miracle at the Meadowlands II User:Muboshgu 21:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC) delete for failing . –  Deletion of Miracle at the Meadowlands II WP:SPORTSEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2128 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adolph Aloys von Braun User:Bearian 19:28, 17 October 2011 (UTC) keep per ; he was equivalent to Secretary of the Cabinet in today's United States Deletion of Adolph Aloys von Braun WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +2129 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Carlström User:Eggishorn NONE delete Completely self-promotional sources. Not one single source presented comes even within shouting distance of being a . Given the re-creation, the extreme tenor of the claims, and the disruption in this AfD, I also suggest '''Salting Deletion of Victor Carlström WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2130 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eileen Davies User:Pmedema 16:50, 13 July 2008 (UTC) delete simply fails and therefore fails Deletion of Eileen Davies WP:V||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2131 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 Time 100 User:Guillaume2303 16:11, 4 May 2012 (UTC) merge """I agree completely with Enric Naval. The 2012 list in itself is not notable, there are no sources ''about'' this list, just scattered mentions that """"John Doe was on the 2012 list"""". As such, this list does not meet """ Deletion of 2012 Time 100 WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2132 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nelabhotla Venkateswarlu (3rd nomination) User:Bearian 13:02, 12 January 2021 (UTC) delete per , , , and . There is no way to fix this hot mess of an over-the-topic puff piece of a resume, for what is a run of the mill person. It seems they are involved in self-marketing, which is not really a substantive business. |Closing admin should consider salting it Deletion of Nelabhotla Venkateswarlu (3rd nomination) WP:TNT||WP:GNG||WP:MILL||WP:NOTRESUME||WP:SALT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +2133 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bias in Mental Testing User:Cullen328 04:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC) keep """The book is certainly both notable and controversial. It meets as it """"has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself"""", namely, hundreds of reviews. Though the original author has since been blocked, several other editors have contributed to the article. Any shortcomings in the current version of the article should be addressed by normal editing""" Deletion of Bias in Mental Testing WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2134 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Journey of a Thousand Miles User:Matthew 22:27, 11 April 2007 (UTC) keep The consensus is to improve, not delete (see ). I see no reasoning as to why they can't be improved Deletion of The Journey of a Thousand Miles WP:EPISODE Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +2135 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soup all'Imperatrice User:Velella 20:51, 15 May 2021 (UTC) delete despite the slight confusion over sources, there is no evidence here, or in searches or in a reasonably extensive library of recipe books that I have available that this was anything other than one author's personal recipe. There is nothing to indicate any notability or indeed, any significance. Just another recipe. Fails . '''''  Deletion of Soup all'Imperatrice WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2136 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg H. Sims User:Oakshade 03:32, 6 November 2008 (UTC) keep A producer and writer of many films and per sources provided by MichaelQSchmidt above, seems to pass Deletion of Greg H. Sims WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2137 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan McGillivray User:LlamaAl 16:58, 20 December 2012 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Ryan McGillivray WP:MMANOT||WP:NMMA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2138 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe castillo User:Orangemike 17:04, 11 February 2008 (UTC) delete for all the reasons cited, but especially the blatant violations of |verifiability Deletion of Joe castillo :WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2139 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Rosatti (2nd nomination) User:Nomoskedasticity 16:44, 2 January 2010 (UTC) keep with restoration of the crime family association passages. That issue was supported by perfectly respectable sources (newspapers in Philadelphia and Palm Beach, in addition to the ''Village Voice''). This AfD has been mounted with a false premise; Rosatti meets and it is disingenuous to delete the portions of the article that establish notability and then to claim that he is not notable Deletion of John Rosatti (2nd nomination) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2140 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fashionpop User:Joe 20:38, 16 November 2009 (UTC) delete Per Deletion of Fashionpop WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +2141 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metric Arts User:AllyD 16:30, 28 January 2017 (UTC) delete A article originating from February 2013, in which month a similarly-named article was https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_Arts deleted from the Spanish Wikipedia as promotional. My searches are finding nothing to indicate more than a firm going about its business. Fails , Deletion of Metric Arts :WP:SPA||:WP:CORPDEPTH||:WP:GNG Wikipedia:Single-purpose account 21 +2142 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lil Eazy-E User:Burntsauce 17:20, 23 August 2007 (UTC) delete """especially the non-notable singles and albums, all of which fail miserably. The remainder of these """"unsigned comments"""" are nothing more than ball gazing. If Lil Eazy-E does ever become notable, we can write about him then""" Deletion of Lil Eazy-E WP:MUSIC||WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2143 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Troubles in Silverbridge User:Guliolopez 11:36, 19 February 2019 (UTC) merge """to Silverbridge, County Armagh. Per nom. And (""""page is very short and is unlikely to be expanded within a reasonable amount of time""""; 13 years seems like a """"reasonable amount of time"""". As the content hasn't been expanded beyond a bullet or so in that time, it seems appropriate to merge that bullet elsewhere""" Deletion of The Troubles in Silverbridge WP:MERGEREASON Wikipedia:Merging 58 +2144 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of character actors User:SlamDiego 08:29, 6 September 2008 (UTC) delete A '''''noble''''' thought, but , just as nominator says. If the list is restricted to ''notable'' actors, then a ''Category'' is the correct way of supporting the list Deletion of List of character actors WP:LISTCRUFT Wikipedia:Listcruft 66 +2145 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duck and Cover (South African band) User:Grandruskiy48 17:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC) delete Fails no reliable sources available Deletion of Duck and Cover (South African band) WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2146 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sokratis Dioudis User:GiantSnowman 10:45, 10 August 2012 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Sokratis Dioudis WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2147 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peace sign position User:Whispering 18:27, 29 August 2006 (UTC) delete per and |Wikipedia is not for things made up in bed one day Deletion of Peace sign position WP:V||WP:NFT Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2148 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Floyd User:Bagumba 09:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC) comment """No issue if the primary topic for George Floyd is a redirect to Death of George Floyd. However, there are a few title matches handled by the dab's """"see also"""". {{u|Anon0098}} commented on partial titles at Talk:George_Floyd#Recent_Protests, and {{u|Paintspot}} attempted to add another partial title before.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=George_Floyd&diff=959611387&oldid=959526033 No opinion currently if that is sufficient reason to keep but move the dab""" Deletion of George Floyd WP:PARTIAL Wikipedia:Disambiguation 64 +2149 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Femina Look of the Year User:Northamerica1000 14:59, 21 June 2016 (UTC) merge to Femina (India), which hosted the event. This is a functional -M that will improve the merge target article Deletion of Femina Look of the Year WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +2150 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kapoutland Pro Wrestling User:Kinu 21:08, 31 July 2006 (UTC) delete per all deletes above, looks like a worthy candidate. Can we go one day without a backyard wrestling article Deletion of Kapoutland Pro Wrestling WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +2151 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fifth Beatle (Film) User:MichaelQSchmidt 04:56, 18 December 2008 (UTC) delete as not meeting criteria of Deletion of The Fifth Beatle (Film) WP:NFF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2152 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clinton Foundation-State Department controversy User:Muboshgu 17:07, 9 September 2016 (UTC) delete WP:POVFORK, , , , , . –  Deletion of Clinton Foundation-State Department controversy WP:PROFRINGE||WP:SYNTH||WP:OR||WP:V||WP:BLP Wikipedia:Fringe theories 44 +2153 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QuantAlea (2nd nomination) User:AllyD 11:51, 13 February 2017 (UTC) delete I am seeing |nothing to indicate that this company is of |encyclopaedic notability Deletion of QuantAlea (2nd nomination) :WP:RS||:WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2154 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Great Kathmandu (2nd nomination) User:JasonNox 01:35, 26 August 2006 (UTC) keep I feel it meets the and guidelines. I live in didsbury and know of this establishment. I will see if I can dig up some stuff to add to the page Deletion of The Great Kathmandu (2nd nomination) WP:CORP||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2155 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip King (tennis) User:Smartyllama 13:10, 25 July 2017 (UTC) comment At the very least, this page should be redirected to Vania King, as with many other non-notable sportspeople related to notable sports people, including Tate Matheny, Tyler Nevin, Ryan Ripken, Mariano Rivera III, Casey Fitzgerald (ice hockey), and Joseph LaMotta, the last two of which were explicitly closed as redirect at AfD. As I said above, I think he's notable, but if consensus is that he's not, the article should at the very least be redirected as an |alternative to deletion. Pinging {{u|Johnpacklambert}} and {{u|Tvx1}}, the only two delete !votes at this point, to see if they would support a redirect instead given this context Deletion of Phillip King (tennis) WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +2156 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avalon Motor Park User:B 14:01, 6 February 2012 (UTC) comment I've undone the redirection because it will disrupt this running discussion and you ''have'' to move the page history as well. I have restored the content of the original article, and have tagged the new one for deletion under #A10|A10 Deletion of Avalon Motor Park WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +2157 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Carolina Green Party User:Me 03:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC) merge Fails . Suggest merge to List of state Green Parties in the United States Deletion of North Carolina Green Party WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2158 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oproiescu Sorin User:Hobbes 20:21, 1 October 2011 (UTC) delete Zero Google news hits. No RS hits. About the best I could find is this blog notice http://soccertactician.wordpress.com/2011/08/02/oproiescu_sorin/ which may be an out-and-out advert; he's apparently out of football altogether at the moment. He's listed in the article as playing for Politehnica Timişoara, but cannot seem to find him on their WP entry or official website. Fails and Deletion of Oproiescu Sorin WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2159 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southeast North Dakota State University User:DARTH 10:36, 2 June 2011 (UTC) delete as failure to . Not a single source provided, and possibly even hoax Deletion of Southeast North Dakota State University WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2160 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Guildhall at SMU (2nd nomination) User:Hahnchen 21:39, 14 February 2014 (UTC) keep Or merge. Passes now like it did 7 years ago. Sources available - http://www.edge-online.com/features/university-profile-guildhall-smu/http://www.g4tv.com/thefeed/blog/post/715866/g4u-smus-guildhall-video-game-design-program/http://www.1up.com/features/game-design-101?pager.offset=0 Deletion of The Guildhall at SMU (2nd nomination) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2161 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Speziale User:Qworty 07:05, 11 January 2011 (UTC) delete Fails , , and Deletion of Robin Speziale WP:AUTHOR||WP:BK||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2162 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Maguire (boxer) User:Jakejr 22:32, 21 May 2014 (UTC) delete Fails . I agree with the previous comments about him not showing notability Deletion of Michael Maguire (boxer) WP:NBOX Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2163 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Tutak User:AKS 13:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC) delete Seems to be failing & Deletion of Robert Tutak WP:ARTIST||WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2164 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dream Car Racing 3D [[User talk:Czar|czar]] 19:36, 16 November 2016 (UTC) delete A little more listening might be in order. Try these links: This article topic lacks |significant coverage from |reliable, |independent sources. (|?) It had few meaningful hits (more than listings) in a /RS|video game reliable sources https://www.google.com/cse/home?cx=003516479746865699832:leawcwkqifq custom Google search. It doesn't have enough depth of coverage in reliable sources to write meaningfully on the topic, and there is no indication that the game is somehow notable despite this lack of coverage. There are no worthwhile redirect targets Deletion of Dream Car Racing 3D WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:IS||WP:42||WP:VG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2165 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of guests on Red Eye w/ Greg Gutfeld (2nd nomination) User:Shawn 15:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC) delete one of several talk show guest lists we've seen at Afd lately. The consensus seems to be that these are all rather trivial and do not rise to the level of meeting and I do think that is the case here Deletion of List of guests on Red Eye w/ Greg Gutfeld (2nd nomination) WP:NLIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2166 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Taemin User:SoWhy 12:20, 3 July 2017 (UTC) merge to List of Produce 101 Season 2 contestants per -R. Really people, why do we need to delete everything that can easily be handled differently? Regards Deletion of Kim Taemin WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +2167 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal rotation curve [[User talk:120.23.241.114|talk]]) 13:19, 16 October 2014 (UTC) comment Somebody should perhaps read and . -- Special:Contributions/120.23.241.114|120.23.241.114 Deletion of Universal rotation curve WP:COI||WP:YOURSELF Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +2168 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of National Football League records (team) User:Arxiloxos 16:35, 14 January 2015 (UTC) keep As {{U|Cbl62}} says, such a list of ''records'' is core information in the coverage of any notable sport, and not the sort of thing to which is addressed Deletion of List of National Football League records (team) WP:NOTSTATSBOOK Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2169 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarmayacar User:Gidonb 14:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC) delete As an independent entity, no clear merge or redirect target. Between keep and delete, it's delete for the reasons mentioned by the nominiator. Also fails the Deletion of Sarmayacar WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2170 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edificio Someillan User:Cewbot 00:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC) comment This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for |lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be '''eligible for |soft deletion''' at the end of its 7-day listing Deletion of Edificio Someillan WP:NOQUORUM||WP:SOFTDELETE Wikipedia:Deletion process 72 +2171 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notable names in anime User:Jay32183 18:36, 31 August 2007 (UTC) delete The list has a subjectively defined scope, therefore, it can't pass . The intention of the list seems to be subjective so the scope cannot be redefined to be acceptable Deletion of Notable names in anime WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2172 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noémie Lafrance User:Joe 13:24, 8 May 2010 (UTC) keep Passes Deletion of Noémie Lafrance WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2173 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharepointboost User:Encycloshave 16:05, 13 May 2012 (UTC) delete """Fails . ProQuest, a considerable and reliable news database that includes computer and Microsoft-related publications, returned one hit from M2 PressWire, which gave this disclaimer: """"M2 Communications disclaims all liability for information provided within M2 PressWIRE. Data supplied by named party/parties."""" Hardly a reliable source., so zero at ProQuest. LexisNexis returned nothing on the company. And while I think a list of awards would be fine if it were used to reference a company's receiving that award, SharePoint Village citations are not being used for that purpose. I've also looked at CMS Wire, and their reviews have conflict of interest issues. They publish reviews on products from the same companies that buy advertising at CMS Wire, and these reviews are not comprehensive, critical reviews. See my notes at the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#CMS Wire as a reliable source?|reliable sources noticeboard for further details""" Deletion of Sharepointboost WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2174 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Cherry (developer) User:Zxcvbnm 10:43, 4 March 2020 (UTC) delete Non-notable except in relation to Hollow Knight. Possibly , but either way this should not be an article yet per Deletion of Team Cherry (developer) WP:TOOSOON||WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +2175 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philadelphia transplant User:Ezeu 10:28, 21 June 2006 (UTC) delete fails and . Not a single reference given by those who want it kept despite this AFD being here for five days. The only argument is that one must visit philadelphia to verify this, and that reveals how obscure a phenomenon this is Deletion of Philadelphia transplant WP:NOR||WP:NEO Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2176 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prophet Isa El-Buba User:Jack 11:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC) delete Google reveals facebook, youtube, newsletters, the odd book, and a solitary one-paragrapher about how he predicted a politician would lose an election - not a thing to indicate notability. The article itself is outrageously |promotional, bordering on |complete bollocks. |Nuke it from orbit Deletion of Prophet Isa El-Buba WP:NOTPROMO||WP:CB||WP:TNT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2177 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conspiracy theories of the United States presidential election, 2016 User:Rhododendrites 18:24, 3 September 2016 (UTC) delete """I'm still not convinced there's an intelligible encyclopedic subject here. There are sources using the term """"conspiracy theory"""" to talk about specific claims and there are sources which talk about the use of conspiracy theories being a trend in one campaign or another -- or in the election in general. Given the latter, I get why there are people arguing to keep. My problem is that it's analogous to """"List of lies of the United States presidential election, 2016"""" based on sources like http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/explaining-scandals-lies-incivility-2016-election-teens/ this, http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/debunking-biggest-lies-trumps-speech this, or http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/ben-carson-donald-trump-are-the-least-truthful-candidates-20151215 this. Or a """"List of crazy claims of the United States presidential election, 2016"""" because of sources like http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/donald-trumps-craziest-quotes-the-2016-presidential-hopeful-speaks-201568 this or http://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/crazy-quotes-2016-campaign-trail-216157 this. There are indeed plenty of sources for both -- talking about individual crazy claims and a pattern of crazy claims. The problem is, """"conspiracy theory"""", like """"crazy claim"""" does not in this usage have any clear meaning such that they can be brought together without ''either'' (a) , or (b) sourcing that simply uses the term (in which case a list of """"crazy"""" claims also fits the bill). As others have pointed out, many of the things called """"conspiracy theories"""" do not include a conspiracy, but are rather just baseless/fringe/outrageous claims. There's plenty of room in the various campaign/election articles for mention of particular claims that attracted significant attention, though. &mdash""" Deletion of Conspiracy theories of the United States presidential election, 2016 WP:SYNTH Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2178 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Williamson's Chapel United Methodist Church User:TimBuck2 16:31, 5 November 2018 (UTC) delete I can't find significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Fails to meet Deletion of Williamson's Chapel United Methodist Church WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2179 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B-3 Long Range Strike Platform User:Ktr101 04:04, 8 January 2008 (UTC) delete per rystal. The requirements haven't even yet been settled on and the assignment of the designator B-3 is entirely speculative. I agree with Deletion of B-3 Long Range Strike Platform WP:C Wikipedia:Copyrights 60 +2180 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyper Optical pointer extension User:Glrx 03:52, 29 April 2012 (UTC) delete TivaSerano explains at Talk:Hyper Optical pointer extension that the state change is the addition of 3 references. Those references are Sabri's patent, a related patent certificate, and an acceptance notification for a yet-unpublished paper. These documents neither independent nor secondary sources. Even if the unpublished acceptance notice is taken as a good source, there are not multiple reliable sources here. The long list of references at the end of the article are not about HOPE; they are about techniques that HOPE (and other systems) use. The article does not meet Deletion of Hyper Optical pointer extension WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2181 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tatyana Arntgolts User:SwisterTwister 02:09, 18 December 2012 (UTC) keep per meeting ,http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1708631/filmotype and . As offered by Deletion of Tatyana Arntgolts WP:ENT||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2182 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amb Jogi User:Atlantic306 19:16, 30 March 2018 (UTC) keep passes criteria 12 of having been the subject of national television coverage, and has coverage in reliable sources Deletion of Amb Jogi WP:NMUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2183 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambridge Satchel Company User:Ihcoyc 14:51, 25 October 2011 (UTC) delete """albeit weakly. It would appear that there are indeed sources talking about the business. There's a human interest story of the week aspect about its foundation, and it would appear that its products have become a passing fad in the world of fashion. I don't see this kind of coverage as making a case that this business has """"|had any significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education."""" It apparently makes satchels that some folks like. A worthy achievement, but not the sort of thing that equates to the sort of long term significance that endures for centuries and makes the business an encyclopedia subject""" Deletion of Cambridge Satchel Company WP:ORGIN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2184 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Gentile User:Djsasso 18:49, 7 February 2012 (UTC) keep passes criteria #3 as also pointed out by Deletion of Brandon Gentile WP:NHOCKEY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2185 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enslavement of Beauty User:Chubbles 01:29, 21 June 2012 (UTC) keep Two albums on the Head Not Found label meets bullet 5 Deletion of Enslavement of Beauty WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2186 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MV Island Sky User:Parsecboy 13:40, 16 May 2008 (UTC) keep per MBK004's comments. It's not a violation of Deletion of MV Island Sky WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2187 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Butta Creamé (2nd nomination) User:JBsupreme 07:16, 7 July 2008 (UTC) delete fails to demonstrate notability under guidelines Deletion of Butta Creamé (2nd nomination) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2188 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chantra User:Ihcoyc 15:57, 18 December 2009 (UTC) delete Notability is |not inherited, and it looks like this disc is simply a compilation that distributes software that could all be had from other sources, and as such seems trivial. This is like saying that since Jingle Bells is a notable song, if I make a holiday mix disc that contains Jingle Bells, my mix disc is an encyclopedia subject too Deletion of Chantra WP:INHERIT Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +2189 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mosaic notation program (2nd nomination) User:Dreamyshade 04:30, 30 July 2017 (UTC) keep This is an abandoned product but it looks like it was notable in its day. In addition to the sources that the article currently has, I found https://www.jstor.org/stable/3680582?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents this review in an academic journal from 1993 and a https://www.copyright.gov/1201/2006/comments/robinson.pdf comment about the program for the DMCA anti-circumvention exemption process in 2006 (see Digital Millennium Copyright Act#Anti-circumvention exemptions. This tells me that this is a sufficiently important and well-documented part of music notation software history that we should keep the article. The article should probably be renamed to '''Composer's Mosaic''' to fit better Deletion of Mosaic notation program (2nd nomination) WP:CRITERIA Wikipedia:Article titles 18 +2190 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BS.Player (2nd nomination) User:Bejnar 22:13, 7 August 2014 (UTC) delete for lack of ''significant'' coverage in independent eliable sources|reliable sources. Fails Deletion of BS.Player (2nd nomination) WP:R||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Redirect 73 +2191 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenny Bae User:VQuakr 08:24, 20 July 2012 (UTC) keep per . Significant coverage http://www.asianpacificpost.com/article/electrifying-violinist-new-face-asian-music here and http://view.koreaherald.com/kh/view.php?ud=20090526000096&cpv=0 here provided the sources are regarded as reliable Deletion of Jenny Bae WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2192 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mail Bastard User:Zupreme 02:27, 2 August 2006 (UTC) delete fails , no , likely campaign by Deletion of Mail Bastard WP:WEB||WP:V||WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2193 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netwitness User:Bearian 22:05, 20 November 2012 (UTC) keep the ''New York Times'' article mentions the copmany in the lead. The rest of the coverage also looks |fairly deep. The article ''is'' spammy, but bad writing can be fixed through the normal editing processes, not by AfD Deletion of Netwitness WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2194 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pavle Stanimirovic [[User_talk:ZfJames|chat page ]], [[Special:Contributions/ZfJames|contribs]]) 01:55, 15 May 2018 (UTC) delete This article certainly fails , but the fellow has a lot of media coverage... I'm somewhat conflicted, but I say 'delete' because there is not a lot of coverage that isn't incidental (i.e. he happens to be referenced as an 'expert' on a specific crime group in a few articles). '''- zfJames''' ''Please Template:Reply_to|ping me in your reply on this page Deletion of Pavle Stanimirovic WP:PERPETRATOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2195 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saudi Arabia and state sponsored terrorism User:BDD 14:36, 25 September 2012 (UTC) keep Calling this POV misunderstands . We can neutrally report on accusations made in , and there have certainly been allegations of Saudi-sponsored terrorism in reliable sources. I encourage editors with POV or synthesis concerns to tag the sections that concern them and discuss the issue on the talk page Deletion of Saudi Arabia and state sponsored terrorism WP:NPOV||WP:RS Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +2196 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baman Piderman User:MelanieN 01:02, 26 September 2010 (UTC) delete Fails by a mile, no coverage ABOUT this web cartoon found anywhere Deletion of Baman Piderman WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2197 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward F. Group User:Drchriswilliams 09:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC) delete This person has provided a couple of quotes that appeared in the mainstream press in features articles that were covering celebrity colon cleansing, but this doesn't meet . A lack of coverage in reliable sources means that notability has not been established Deletion of Edward F. Group WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2198 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FADVOCAT User:LittleOldMe 12:58, 20 March 2008 (UTC) delete It seems that the primary author also has a |conflict of interest Deletion of FADVOCAT WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +2199 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LinuxDC++ NONE NONE comment """Most criticisms of that I've seen involve it being too inclusive (especially the free-software clause). Yet you seem to be using its still-tentative status as a justification for being even ''more'' inclusive. In the absence of more specific guidelines, the general guideline that prevails in AfDs is non-trivial coverage by multiple |reliable sources. If you're going to ignore (which, while somewhat controversial in parts, is usually well-received in AfD discussions), you should be providing more standard evidence of notability, not just saying, effectively, """"keep 'cause I think it should be kept""" Deletion of LinuxDC++ WP:RS||WP:SOFTWARE Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2200 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Agnes Sina-Inakoju User:TheGracefulSlick 20:33, 26 January 2018 (UTC) delete WP:NOTNEWS|Wikipedia is not a newspaper; crimes, even tragic ones, are not automatically exonerated from this fact. The same story is being |routinely covered but there is a clear lack of |lasting significance Deletion of Murder of Agnes Sina-Inakoju WP:ROUTINE||WP:LASTING Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2201 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent community User:Calgary 22:56, 17 August 2007 (UTC) delete For the length of the article the number/detail of the cited references is strongly lacking. Also the article is very heavily interwoven with analysis, in a manner that is expressly covered by as being inappropriate for Wikipedia Deletion of Intelligent community WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2202 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tammy Jennings User:Dweller 12:20, 18 January 2010 (UTC) comment I'm puzzled. If the world was so convinced she'll be notable in a few weeks' time, why isn't she whizzing past the normal criteria now Deletion of Tammy Jennings WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2203 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Hina plot summaries User:Jay32183 00:34, 30 June 2007 (UTC) delete Article is just plot summaries, fails #PLOT Deletion of Love Hina plot summaries WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2204 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/INC Research User:Theseeker4 15:28, 13 November 2008 (UTC) delete Could not find any hits that established notability of company, fails Deletion of INC Research WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2205 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MSB FTW User:Irongargoyle 23:22, 5 September 2006 (UTC) delete Others may disagree, but I feel as though NN online forms fall under the ''groups'' section of |CSD A7 Deletion of MSB FTW WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +2206 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VS Media User:Citobun 07:34, 13 November 2015 (UTC) delete or '''rewrite entirely'''. Article written by single-purpose account for promotional purposes. |Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. The quality of the writing is that of a promotional release, not an encyclopedia article; there is very little encyclopedic content here and the notability of the company is not clear. If it can be demonstrated that the company meets the relevant Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)|notability criteria then the article should be rewritten as an Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|NPOV encyclopedia article. If not then it should be deleted for now Deletion of VS Media WP:NOTADVERTISING Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2207 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freeda Foreman [[User talk:204.126.132.231|talk]]) 19:05, 19 August 2014 (UTC) delete Fails and .Special:Contributions/204.126.132.231|204.126.132.231 Deletion of Freeda Foreman WP:NBOX||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2208 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FreeHeadset.org (2nd nomination) User:OliverKianzo 10:09, 1 February 2019 (UTC) delete Promotional article Deletion of FreeHeadset.org (2nd nomination) WP:SOAP Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2209 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. K. Dodds User:Canley 10:43, 13 March 2007 (UTC) keep Not sure I agree with the assertion that minimal information fails . Fairly borderline notability, but has a small recurring role of note in ''Prison Break'', and several major movie credits (small roles however Deletion of K. K. Dodds WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +2210 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Rossmann User:Tutelary 02:21, 23 May 2020 (UTC) keep I am the creator of this article. I would not have created this article if I feel it did not pass |general notability guideline, which I truly and firmly believe that it does. Let me back up my statements. Louis Rossmann has received substantial secondary coverage in the following |reliable sources. https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/9kxzpy/apple-is-still-trying-to-sue-the-owner-of-an-independent-iphone-repair-shop-louis-rossmann-henrik-huseby Vice https://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/apple-right-to-repair Fox Business https://mspoweruser.com/apples-independent-repair-provider-program-eviscerated-in-profanity-laden-video/ MS Power user https://www.cbc.ca/news/thenational/complete-control-apple-accused-of-overpricing-restricting-device-repairs-1.4859099 CBC--which did an indepth review of Apple with Louis Rossmann, which delved in depth. https://9to5mac.com/2016/07/01/tekserve-closure-louis-rossman-videos/ 9to5mac https://appleinsider.com/articles/18/10/19/apple-repair-policy-critic-vows-to-fight-counterfeit-battery-seizure-by-us-customs Apple Insider https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/may/08/sidestepping-apple-the-third-party-tinkerers-fighting-for-your-right-to-repair The Guardian https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/how-digital-copyright-law-being-used-run-roughshod-over-repairs-n628606 NBC News https://www.iphoneincanada.ca/news/nyc-repair-tech-apple-customs-seize-batteries/ iPhone Canada https://9to5mac.com/2017/02/15/apple-nebraska-right-to-repair/ 9to5mac. https://boingboing.net/2017/04/17/right-to-repair.html Boing Boing https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2016/06/17/apple-wants-to-kill-a-bill-that-could-make-it-easier-for-you-to-fix-your-iphone/ Washington Post https://apps.derstandard.de/privacywall/story/2000109587848/ist-das-ein-placebo-reparaturexperte-entsetzt-ueber-kuehlung-von-macbook Foreign Newspapers even. Louis Rossmann has definitely met the |general notability guideline. In addition to the sources I cited above that mention him in depth, Louis Rossmann is also frequently mentioned in far more sources in passing, and is widely sought for input on matters pertaining to Apple and the repairability of their products. It's also established that once a subject is notable, they do not need to have consistent coverage to maintain said notability, per Deletion of Louis Rossmann WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:NTEMP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2211 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-liked YouTube videos User:Paintspot 18:42, 11 February 2019 (UTC) keep per above. Per . Has enough secondary source coverage Deletion of List of most-liked YouTube videos WP:LISTN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2212 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 International Friendlies User:Joseph2302 10:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC) delete per , we don't need a separate article for this. The relevant information is (or at least could be) in the team pages for the countries. As they're friendlies and not a tournament like World Cup, Euros/Copa America, there is no link between friendlies, and so as per {{U|Spiderone}}, I cannot see how it would ever be able to satisfy Deletion of 2021 International Friendlies WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:NLIST Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2213 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson Junior High School User:Störm 09:37, 22 December 2017 (UTC) delete per nomination, fails Deletion of Jackson Junior High School WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2214 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of haunted locations User:The 00:50, 28 January 2007 (UTC) keep Essentially all this is is a dismabiguation page that links to existing articles that claim paranormal activity occurs at a certain place. is actually followed in the individual articles, as they themselves provide the links to reputable sources to back up the claims. As for the article itself failing , that's a bogus claim. Look at the bottom. References. A lot of the article IS supported by links to existing articles on the internet. That's satisfied too. Just because you haven't heard of something in the article isn't legitimate reason to delete the entire thing Deletion of List of haunted locations WP:V||WP:V||WP:NOR Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2215 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vitor Ribeiro User:east718 NONE keep You should list it at then, and besides, this seems like a clear-cut case where it's ''our'' content being stolen. '''  Deletion of Vitor Ribeiro WP:CV Wikipedia:Copyright violations 16 +2216 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lupe Fiasco's Food & Liquor II: The Great American Rap Album (3rd nomination) User:Jorgath 19:28, 17 April 2012 (UTC) merge to Lupe Fiasco, '''without prejudice''' to recreation when the album is released. Until then, it's a violation of , even though it's clearly going to be notable. Twitter is not a reliable source Deletion of Lupe Fiasco's Food & Liquor II: The Great American Rap Album (3rd nomination) WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2217 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Crites User:Infrangible 02:20, 30 December 2006 (UTC) delete complete #G1|nonsense Deletion of Albert Crites WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +2218 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Wallington User:E 12:01, 8 January 2019 (UTC) delete """claims are highly exaggerated. For example, """"starred"""" in a BBC series, but the series was a home gardening show where the show visits a different home gardener every week, and one week they came to his garden. None of the several similar claims in article are claims to anything recognized here as notability. and there is no of him""" Deletion of Jack Wallington WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2219 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of albums containing a hidden track (2nd nomination) User:Verdatum 16:40, 20 August 2008 (UTC) delete I believe a decent article could be created that is a list of notable hidden tracks. This would be albums containing hidden tracks that are reported in reputable independent resources; this would naturally be shorter than a list of notable albums that happen to contain hidden tracks. But, such a list would really require someone actively watching the article to see that the inclusion criteria is strictly enforced. Concievably, the inclusion criteria of this list can be explicitly stated (as per ) to reflect the same thing; in which case, i'm fine with keeping it. I do like the idea of albums with a hidden track existing as a category, if such is not already the case Deletion of List of albums containing a hidden track (2nd nomination) WP:SAL Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists 51 +2220 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/True Detective User:Necrothesp 14:44, 1 April 2014 (UTC) keep This has already been fully discussed on the Talk:True Detective (TV series)|talkpage. Perfectly acceptable disambiguation page per when no primary topic has been determined Deletion of True Detective WP:TWODABS Wikipedia:Disambiguation 64 +2221 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 Chick-fil-A gay-marriage freedom of speech controversy User:Casprings 02:40, 4 August 2012 (UTC) keep Meets no question Deletion of 2012 Chick-fil-A gay-marriage freedom of speech controversy WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2222 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taiga.io User:Rhododendrites 13:56, 28 December 2014 (UTC) delete The refs above appear decent, perhaps falling just short of in my view, though their use of the same images with much of the same information makes me suspicious that they may be working off PR materials. It may also be that it's just -- it's still in beta and some of the article's language is even in future tense. There's also the issue of the article containing information, some of it presented as though for an advertisement, company website, etc. --&mdash Deletion of Taiga.io WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:TOOSOON||WP:UNDUE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2223 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paper Garden Records User:NinjaRobotPirate 05:40, 13 April 2016 (UTC) delete I found http://clatl.com/cribnotes/archives/2015/08/25/brooklyns-paper-garden-records-brings-music-to-ponce-city-market this article in ''Creative Loafing (Atlanta)|Creative Loafing'', but it's more about an event than the record label. There were also a few more trivial mentions scattered about, such as http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/11/technology/turntablefm-lets-users-play-dj-to-virtual-crowds.html?_r=0 this article in ''The New York Times''. However, it's still a bit |too soon for an article, as these are not in-depth coverage of the record label. I guess sending it to draft space would be OK, too Deletion of Paper Garden Records WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +2224 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adify User:Steve NONE merge """to Cox Media Group. This topic is not historically significant. It is another startup or youngish company that was bought by a larger company. This is business as usual. Also, just because there is coverage in publications like The New York Times and The Washington Post does not mean this topic is notable. Both of these published articles are small business announcements and do not qualify as sources. The coverage is routine business announcements with a quote from a company source - a senior vice president . The other sources mentioned do the same. Coverage in these so-called """"news"""" articles rely only on company executives for information. This is not independent coverage as required when using |reliable sources to determine notability""" Deletion of Adify WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2225 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social network aggregation User:Colonel 11:27, 10 April 2008 (UTC) keep """It is obviously not a neologism as these are all long-standing words and their meaning seems clear enough. Per : """"''use a title that is a descriptive phrase in plain English, even if this makes for a somewhat long or awkward title.''"""" And there seems to be enough discussion of the topic http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=%22social+network%22+aggregation&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&start=10 out there to support an article""" Deletion of Social network aggregation WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +2226 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of systems biology research groups User:Kingofaces43 20:38, 11 April 2016 (UTC) delete As others above have mentioned, is pretty clear on this. Seems to be a place for using a category if someone really wanted to organize these rather than creating an article Deletion of List of systems biology research groups WP:NOTADIRECTORY Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2227 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oliver Skipp User:GiantSnowman 12:54, 1 August 2018 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Oliver Skipp WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2228 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Loverterian's Decree User:Cullen328 05:29, 31 August 2011 (UTC) delete """We could make it a contest, and see how many legitimate reasons to delete this """"article"""" can be advanced before someone closes this debate. One per customer, please. I will take |no original research""" Deletion of The Loverterian's Decree WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2229 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of TEDMED speakers User:Snow 02:38, 26 June 2012 (UTC) delete The list itself does not meet notability standards (even if TEDMED itself does), is in conflict with hat_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_directory|hat Wikipedia is not on several levels, is promotional, and isn't even verified at present Deletion of List of TEDMED speakers WP:W Help:Watchlist 57 +2230 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoni Sherbatov User:24 NONE keep In reference to other previous comments, I have reviewed the page from a professional standpoint. The page for Yoni Sherbatov is very well written and the facts being presented within it are well referenced also. I do read and understand that he does not meet these certain requirements. He is a well known within the MMA and boxing community as a well respected fighter. I think that there should be a mid-level category for fighters that arent at the top elite status. As to appreciate all fighters at different points within their fighting status. I think many other people would benefit from these changes being made too. — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Deletion of Yoni Sherbatov WP:NMMA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2231 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World's Finest Shows User:ERcheck 15:49, 19 February 2006 (UTC) delete Advertisement for company that does not meet . &mdash Deletion of World's Finest Shows WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2232 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirraw User:Hagennos 05:50, 28 January 2018 (UTC) delete Non-notable company. Fails and Deletion of Mirraw WP:GNG||WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2233 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gül Kaplan User:CommanderWaterford 18:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC) delete fails plus , only amateur playings Deletion of Gül Kaplan WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2234 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Index of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters User:RoySmith 19:58, 5 October 2019 (UTC) delete as , not to mention cruft Deletion of Index of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters WP:INDISCRIMINATE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2235 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melia Kreiling User:INeedSupport 20:39, 11 May 2019 (UTC) keep """I think it barely pass , as she has been in numerous films and been part of television shows for quite a while now. A quick Google search in the """"news"""" section shows lots of news about her and the show she's in""" Deletion of Melia Kreiling WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2236 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Ellis User:BrownHairedGirl 11:56, 25 November 2007 (UTC) delete no evidence of substantial coverage in any independent sources, let alone reliable sources, as required by Deletion of Joshua Ellis WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2237 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supercell (mobile network) User:Newtonslaw40 15:34, 29 September 2016 (UTC) keep The article meets notability guidelines. The area of the world may be remote, and the network relatively small, but it meets notability guidelines and supported by multiple . Clearly it's a stub and needs a lot of work, but no reason to delete it - if it is kept it stands a chance of being further developed in time Deletion of Supercell (mobile network) WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2238 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omar Elvir User:Nfitz 22:51, 12 October 2014 (UTC) keep meets and not surprisingly given 70+ appearances for such an internationally well-known team. Examples are http://www.latribuna.hn/2013/10/02/omar-elvir-por-rendimiento-vidakovic-tambien-deberia-estar-aqui/, http://www.elheraldo.hn/zonadeportiva/589846-215/el-invicto-nos-da-fuerza-afirma-omar-elvir, http://www.elheraldo.hn/zonadeportiva/704124-215/omar-elvir-a%C3%BAn-no-es-la-mejor-versi%C3%B3n, http://www.tiempo.hn/cronometro/liga-nacional/item/977-omar-elvir-%E2%80%9Cno-seremos-trampol%C3%ADn-del-marathon%E2%80%9D, and http://www.diez.hn/futboldeprimera/754308-99/omar-elvir-no-s%C3%A9-si-es-que-somos-de-mentalidad-mediocre Deletion of Omar Elvir WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2239 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernoulli stochastics User:Ammarpad 02:26, 25 November 2017 (UTC) delete blatant and promotion of primary source. I am in support of deleting all these wp:OR|OR articles by this user because they are all similar Deletion of Bernoulli stochastics WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2240 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Andoh User:Bart133 21:40, 22 August 2008 (UTC) keep meets as he plays at Ghana's highest level of football; it doesn't matter whether it's professional, as it's the highest amateur level Deletion of Frank Andoh WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2241 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefan Fischer User:Papaursa 04:20, 27 February 2013 (UTC) delete I couldn't find the sources necessary to support the claims of notability and don't believe the article's sources show that he meets or Deletion of Stefan Fischer WP:MANOTE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2242 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JAG (franchise) User:Stuartyeates 09:03, 14 November 2011 (UTC) delete as . Links between the series can be discussed in the series themselves Deletion of JAG (franchise) WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2243 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sérgio Trindade (2nd nomination) User:JFG 11:23, 23 November 2020 (UTC) delete However respectable this person's work is, it still fails the criteria for inclusion spelled out at . Neither can notability be |inherited from the full IPCC organization, comprised of thousands of scientists, that received a Nobel Prize. The only new event since the first AfD reason Mr. Trindade received some attention in 2020 is that he died of COVID. Sadly that doesn't make him more notable Deletion of Sérgio Trindade (2nd nomination) WP:NACADEMICS||WP:NOTINHERITED Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2244 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yosef Babad (HTC) User:David 21:46, 31 December 2009 (UTC) delete I tried and failed to find sources on him — the article mentions two Chicago-area newspaper obituaries but I couldn't find them (so couldn't tell if they were the kind of obituary the family pays to publish or the kind that major newspapers write about famous people). The institution for which he was dean of students is tiny (around 300 students combined from high school and college levels) so his position there may be more analogous to a high school assistant principal than to a major academic position of the type that would meet #6. Regardless of whether he passes , he seems to fail Deletion of Yosef Babad (HTC) WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2245 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alp Akar User:Kemalcan 08:52, 21 January 2021 (UTC) delete delete per YET (actors) he does not meet , , . The awards mentioned in the comments above is just a nomination. He did not actually win it. Not yet notable Deletion of Alp Akar WP:NOT||WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2246 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orders of magnitude (voltage) User:XOR 19:14, 17 October 2018 (UTC) keep """As indicated above, sourcing isn't a problem. Reliable sources include listings of voltages for disparate things, so we're not doing anything conceptually novel by assembling such a list ourselves. We can keep the list from growing too outsized or indiscriminate by following an inclusion criterion of the """"all items must be blue-linked"""" form. I don't see being a real concern here, either. This article is not written as textbookish prose, """"with leading questions and systematic problem solutions as examples"""". ( doesn't apply just because a thing ''exists'' in some textbooks; that would rule out our articles including figures and bibliographies, after all.) So, weighing the concerns, I can't see anything that requires deletion, just ordinary editing""" Deletion of Orders of magnitude (voltage) WP:NOTTEXTBOOK||WP:NOTTEXTBOOK Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2247 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GK Elite Sportswear User:Snotbot 00:48, 10 January 2012 (UTC) comment This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (|step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 January 10 Deletion of GK Elite Sportswear WP:AFDHOWTO Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +2248 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zelda Comic User:Coredesat 04:58, 11 July 2006 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Zelda Comic WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2249 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omnibussimulator User:Jovanmilic97 20:47, 7 July 2019 (UTC) delete I don't see notability here. There is an article about the game on Rock, Paper, Shotgun https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2014/10/06/have-you-played-omsi-bus-simulator/, but nothing much else. I am mostly getting results for Oregon Museum of Science and Industry. Also, I would advise {{u|ThatLawStudent}} to read as to what has to be met which this subject fails (lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources). Plus not being promotional is not the reason to keep it as well Deletion of Omnibussimulator WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2250 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joint Operation Computer Project Team User:Annette46 08:35, 19 August 2008 (UTC) keep the page creator seems sincere, the article seems notable if true, but he will have to really get the article upto all Wikipedia's policy including and . Alternatively '''Merge''', '''Redirect''' with Projects Wavell / Ptarmigan Deletion of Joint Operation Computer Project Team WP:V||WP:RS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2251 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abaana User:A 17:07, 6 September 2016 (UTC) delete No hits on Google News that appear related to the charity. Doesn't pass the bar of Deletion of Abaana WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2252 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saide Ama User:ShadowHalo 22:42, 6 January 2007 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Saide Ama WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2253 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melisse User:Shawnpoo 16:51, 8 March 2009 (UTC) delete per #A7|CSD A7 and per Deletion of Melisse WP:CSD||WP:N Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +2254 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gav Richards User:ArcAngel 21:17, 2 March 2008 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Gav Richards WP:N||WP:COI Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2255 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat Phelan User:Number 22:47, 12 March 2008 (UTC) delete Fails #Athletes. The article can easily be restored if he ever plays professionally Deletion of Pat Phelan WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2256 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liberty Deep Down User:Mifter 01:18, 6 April 2017 (UTC) delete as I stated in my PROD I do not believe that the article meets , it might pass notability eventually but it is very much Deletion of Liberty Deep Down WP:BAND||WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2257 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Collins User:Angelatc 17:24, 10 June 2012 (UTC) delete """definitely non-notable per . This is a vanity entry. Note that the page was created by """"Intact Molls"""" which is an anagram of Matt Collins. He's trolling ya'll""" Deletion of Matt Collins WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2258 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faculty of Management of the University of Warsaw User:Dps04 13:09, 26 August 2020 (UTC) delete or '''redirect''' to University of Warsaw per the nomination. Also of interest is , which provides that {{tq|Faculties, departments or degree programs within a university, college, or school are generally not considered notable unless they have made significant contributions to their field}}. Given the fact that only routine coverage and https://www.polityka.pl/tygodnikpolityka/nauka/1942626,1,jaka-jest-przyszlosc-uczelni-wyzszych.read interviews on the subject was found (which are unlikely to be independent on the subject), it seems unlikely this faculty is one of the rare exceptions with significant contributions in the field of management, or is otherwise notable enough to warrant its own article Deletion of Faculty of Management of the University of Warsaw WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +2259 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 NFL Draft User:Ejgreen77 05:46, 27 April 2020 (UTC) merge to National Football League Draft#Future venues. It's a plausible search term, and redirects are , anyways Deletion of 2023 NFL Draft WP:CHEAP Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap 74 +2260 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Echobox User:K 19:47, 23 June 2018 (UTC) delete sourcing does not meet new and improved ; it's in passing and / or . ''Mediashift'' is closer to what's needed, but it's still . The company has not achieved anything significant just yet. Just a promotional directory listing at this point Deletion of Echobox WP:NCORP||WP:SPIP||WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2261 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People Can Change User:Fireplace 12:50, 27 September 2007 (UTC) delete as and failing . No evidence of substantial coverage from reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The only reliable source that discusses this group online support group is a newspaper article that mentions them in only two paragraphs Deletion of People Can Change WP:SPAM||WP:ORG Wikipedia:Spam 26 +2262 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The adventures of Clive and Banana boy User:Sergecross73 18:11, 17 July 2012 (UTC) delete Appears to be a |hoax Deletion of The adventures of Clive and Banana boy WP:HOAX Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes 40 +2263 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florida Black Racer User:Carolfrog 00:31, 21 March 2007 (UTC) merge with Coluber constrictor priapus (which is even more stubby than this one) and '''redirect'''. It appears not to be a hoax; however, it needs more sources to comply with . Sources are almost certainly available, and editors should work to find them. This article should not be deleted at this time. If sources are not forthcoming, the deletion issue can be revisited in a few months Deletion of Florida Black Racer WP:ATT Wikipedia:Attribution 34 +2264 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olly Groome User:Peripitus 13:35, 2 June 2006 (UTC) delete as nn bio- fails and is not funny enough for BJAODN Deletion of Olly Groome WP:BIO||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2265 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spoorthi User:CookieMonster755 04:29, 6 April 2015 (UTC) merge per {{u|Aircorn}} and Deletion of Spoorthi WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +2266 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chancey Illa User:Superastig 16:21, 23 June 2020 (UTC) merge to Anirudh Ravichander: The song was mentioned in a number of articles, but was barely discussed. It is partially discussed https://www.mid-day.com/articles/chennai-turns-377-interesting-facts-about-the-capital-city-of-tamil-nadu/15545150 here, but that's not good enough for the article to pass Deletion of Chancey Illa WP:NSONG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2267 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Shaw (Encana) User:Bearcat 12:48, 16 July 2021 (UTC) delete """Article is advertorialized (""""Brian Shaw, CFA, is a Canadian financial industry executive with particular expertise in capital market and investing activities""""), has been edited by the subject himself (see ), is referenced overwhelmingly to directory entries and other |primary sources rather than journalist-written third party |reliable source coverage ''about'' him, and states absolutely nothing about his career that would be """"inherently"""" notable enough to exempt it from any of those problems having to be taken seriously""" Deletion of Brian Shaw (Encana) WP:COI||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +2268 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of attacks by the Armenian Secret Army for the Liberation of Armenia User:Yannismarou 19:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC) delete """at least as it is now) and '''merge''' any usefl information to ASALA article. Since I see in the ASALA article two sections named """"major attacks"""", and """"some other attacks"""" I fail to understand what this article adds to the subject. It does not fulfill (attackes are already listed in the ASALA article, and the prose is longer there), and the list doesn't add anything new. So, why couldn't it be just a template included in the ASALA article? If this article is to be saved, its editors must concentrate their efforts on making it useful and informative enough to stand on its own. As it is now, it doesn't. It looks as a fork, even if this is not your intention""" Deletion of List of attacks by the Armenian Secret Army for the Liberation of Armenia WP:SS Wikipedia:Summary style 23 +2269 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matty Miles [[User talk:GetDumb|Get]][[Special:Contributions/GetDumb|Dumb]]''' 01:12, 23 September 2009 (UTC) delete Fails badly. Mention of therefore brings up the likelihood of a violation as well Deletion of Matty Miles WP:N||WP:COI||WP:VAIN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2270 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erlend Krauser User:Wikicology 00:28, 19 October 2014 (UTC) delete No evidence of notability. Subject of the article fails . Subject of the article is not covered in multiple independent |reliable sources. Although it has an article in Romanian Wikipedia but no single reference was present to validate its notability, just like the one we have here (on the english wikipedia Deletion of Erlend Krauser WP:GNG||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2271 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyberscore User:Richwales 20:08, 8 August 2011 (UTC) delete """per and . Almost all the cited """"sources"""" are references to the subject's own web site (hence not independent). The other """"source"""" is from a forum or blog (not generally reliable per ). I couldn't find any other usable source in a Google search""" Deletion of Cyberscore WP:RS||WP:INDY||WP:SPS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2272 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eaglexpress User:Northamerica1000 13:51, 28 September 2012 (UTC) keep The topic passes . Source examples include: http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/1/16/business/20120116160349&sec=business%3Cbr%20/%3E, http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/1/28/business/10554381&sec=business, http://www.thesundaily.my/news/279762, http://www.thesundaily.my/news/268198 Deletion of Eaglexpress WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2273 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sightread User:Red 13:17, 28 September 2008 (UTC) delete Already on Wiktionary, not for Wikipedia (). Also some oririgal research mentioned in the nom Deletion of Sightread WP:DICT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +2274 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vol'jin User:Doctorfluffy 05:27, 3 November 2007 (UTC) delete Fails , unlikely reliable secondary sources can be found to establish notability, and violates #PLOT Deletion of Vol'jin WP:FICT||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2275 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ley tunnel User:Phil 19:45, 21 September 2009 (UTC) delete or, if there is any useful content here that's not already in that article, '''merge''' with secret passage. That is the common English name for what is described in this article, and the linking of secret passages with ley lines seems like a piece of |synthesis that is unsupported by reliable sources Deletion of Ley tunnel WP:synthesis Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2276 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Bennett Cohen User:Stuartyeates 03:59, 19 August 2013 (UTC) merge as above due to lacking in depth coverage in reliable sources as required by the . If such sources get added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page Deletion of David Bennett Cohen WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2277 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malthusian Selection User:Kusma 15:02, 17 December 2005 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Malthusian Selection WP:NOR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2278 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wooster School [[User talk:Benjiboi|Benjiboi]] 18:38, 23 October 2007 (UTC) keep Article seems written and reffed to an acceptable level. If any major flaws exist they should be addressed with regular editing per fD Deletion of Wooster School WP:A Wikipedia:Attribution 34 +2279 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final Fantasy X-3 [[User talk:Ultimus|'''UlTiMuS''']] 10:19, 2 September 2006 (UTC) delete unless sources show up, this is Deletion of Final Fantasy X-3 WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2280 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miser (film) User:The 11:43, 17 April 2019 (UTC) delete since subject fails Deletion of Miser (film) WP:NFF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2281 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Schniedewind User:Dhartung 06:21, 18 July 2007 (UTC) keep but '''cleanup'''. The subject is the occupant of a named and endowed professorial chair at a major university, and while is only a proposed guideline, such individuals have been kept in the past Deletion of William Schniedewind WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2282 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dream (YouTuber) (2nd nomination) [[User talk:98.35.13.170|talk]]) 23:33, 26 December 2020 (UTC) keep per Nsk92 and their additional sources, which show that Dream has gained significant coverage and passes – and not only since the cheating incident. Special:Contributions/98.35.13.170|98.35.13.170 Deletion of Dream (YouTuber) (2nd nomination) WP:ENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2283 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuttichathan user:Andrew 16:21, 21 October 2019 (UTC) keep A survey of sources, such as seen in the search links above indicates that the topic is notable. The rest is then a matter of ordinary editing, not deletion per – which states clearly that brief starts on a topic are welcome. See also Deletion of Kuttichathan WP:IMPERFECT||WP:TLDR Wikipedia:Editing policy 24 +2284 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishal Saxena User:Mduvekot 02:49, 20 June 2017 (UTC) delete I cringed when I read that the subject seems to think that the Hasselblad he professes to love so much is a Full-frame digital SLR|full-frame camera when it's a Medium format (film)|Medium format camera. The article is promotional garbage. The subject is an amateur. On a more serious note: The subject has not received substantial coverage in |independent, |reliable sources and fails every criterion of : 1) He is not regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors. 2) He is not known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique. 3) He has not created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. 4a) His work has not become a significant monument 4b) His work has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition 4c) His work has not won significant critical attention 4d) His work is not represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums Deletion of Vishal Saxena WP:IS||WP:RS||WP:CREATIVE Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2285 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Those Aren't Muskets! User:MelanieN 03:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC) delete I was able to read the article you found, RCLC, and it is indeed a full-length article about this troupe, amounting to significant coverage from an independent reliable source. I used it to add information to the article. Unfortunately I couldn't find any other significant independent coverage, and one such reference is not enough. Maybe a case of . Perhaps the article could be wikified to the author, for expansion if their notability grows Deletion of Those Aren't Muskets! WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +2286 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jorge Gotor Blas User:GiantSnowman 17:50, 27 April 2015 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Jorge Gotor Blas WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2287 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indira gandhi's 20 point program User:Williamborg 02:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC) delete mdash; '''Merge or Keep if & only if it undergoes a major rewrite''' - The topic meets ; a position by a major political figure is noteworthy. But it is almost assuredly a copyright violation unless released by the author or the Government of India, so needs to be summarized in an academic fashion. Attempted to rewrite it to salvage it but could NOT find independent material and was unable to confirm to my satisfaction that it is the work of Indira Ghandi. Does not meet Deletion of Indira gandhi's 20 point program WP:N||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2288 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord Tracy User:Michig 21:45, 4 February 2008 (UTC) keep Passes at least on criterion #6, and probably others if anyone's prepared to dig for references. The band features Pantera's ex-singer and have released several albums. Plenty of google hits, though not a lot of obvious quality Deletion of Lord Tracy WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2289 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Canada Flight 018 Stowaway incident user:Tautomers 23:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC) keep While this story has gotten new coverage after 9 years since it's initial reporting, it's more of a burst of news and doesn't really count as . The story is unusual and kind of head turning, and I would not agree that this is nor do I agree with . The news reporting shows there was more to this story and had ongoing pieces to it. Nevertheless, the story is only a little bit and a little bit and it appears the story has now come to a resolution, and the initial event isn't very big and probably worth deleting. However, I was initially going to say weak delete but I feel a weak keep due to arrests occurring indicating this news story had broader implications beyond the incident itself indicates it has significance, passes and Deletion of Air Canada Flight 018 Stowaway incident WP:LASTING||WP:RUNOFTHEMILL||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BROAD||WP:DIVERSE||WP:GNG||WP:EVENTCRIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2290 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bastian Emig User:BrownHairedGirl 11:07, 25 March 2013 (UTC) comment """As above, the where-to-redirect question is simple: redirect to the band he is most closely associated with. i.e. In Legend.I have just removed a lot of the content from the article, and it's now a stub again. Some of it was unreferenced, some of it misrepresented the sources (such as the claim that he is endorsed by MEINL); and much of what remains is referenced to the band's own website. That breaches Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Using_the_subject_as_a_self-published_source, which says that such material may be used only if """"the article is not based primarily on such sources.""""Note also that #If_the_subject_is_not_notable: ''""""Wikipedia's goal is neither tiny articles that can never be expanded nor articles based primarily on what the subjects say about themselves""" Deletion of Bastian Emig WP:NMUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2291 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Place of power User:Andy 02:53, 11 January 2017 (UTC) keep """Jytdog and QuackGuru should remember than MEDRS does not apply here. Perhaps this is all aery-faery nonsense, but it is also otable nonsense, believed by many people for thousands of years and written about by a good many of them. In particular, written about them since the coincidence of the 1920s boom in post-WWI English spiritualism and the rise of the private motor car for rural touring. Alfred Watkins and Julian Cope would be two obvious starting points for English or British and US sites. Perhaps Copey will follow ''Japrocksampler'' with a third volume of ''The Modern Antiquarian|The Japanese Antiquarian'', as that's a country rife with such sites and hardly discussed in Western, English language sources. There are plenty of sources for this topic, even limiting to pre-internet printed sources, so I fail to see why some (perhaps unwise) use of """"spam sites"""" changes this""" Deletion of Place of power WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2292 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caleb Lawrence McGillvary [[User talk:70.36.137.19|talk]]) 08:31, 17 May 2013 (UTC) keep """Despite NorthBySouthBaranof claiming that two incidents are """"basically a case,"""" last time i took a math class, two did not equal one. We have a rule -- not a BLP2E rule or a BLP3E rule -- and more people have viewed that video than have read many famous books or voted for many politicians. Those people will be following this second incident as well. Special:Contributions/70.36.137.19|70.36.137.19""" Deletion of Caleb Lawrence McGillvary WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +2293 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modissa User:Piotrus 04:02, 20 November 2020 (UTC) delete No evidence the company passes Deletion of Modissa WP:NCOMPANY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2294 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premiership of Stephen Harper User:Torchiest 19:32, 8 April 2011 (UTC) keep How can this even be up for debate? I know, I know, , but this is analogous to Premiership of Gordon Brown and Presidency of Barack Obama. Clearly a notable subject, and yeah maybe it needs work, but deletion shouldn't even be on the list of options for this type of article. It's been around for four and a half years without problems. I don't think this falls under the purview of Canadian law either, unless they burn books before elections. If it's |spammy or |POV, fix it, simple as that Deletion of Premiership of Stephen Harper WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:SPAM||WP:POV Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +2295 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Florida Taser incident (2nd nomination) User:Mkdw 23:08, 17 March 2013 (UTC) keep """I am disturbed by the number of single purpose accounts here. I see two fundamental positions, and . Because Wikipedia is not offering a first-hand account nor is the event a event, technically does not apply here. NOTNEWS does state that if it was a news story it can still be included on Wikipedia as long as it was not routine and had lasting effects. The incident is part of the taser controversy, regularly cited, and """"don't tase me bro"""" became an internet meme. I largely feel the keep camp has shown LASTING and thus avoids NOTNEWS""" Deletion of University of Florida Taser incident (2nd nomination) WP:NOTNEWSPAPER||WP:LASTING||WP:ROUTINE||WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2296 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oobliette Sparks User:Doctorfluffy 23:18, 21 July 2008 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Oobliette Sparks WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2297 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manuel Jiménez (boxer) User:Papaursa 12:09, 14 June 2020 (UTC) delete Fails to meet and my search didn't find the significant independent coverage required to meet . Winning a title in one of the many minor boxing organizations is not enough to show notability, especially when he won less than half his fights Deletion of Manuel Jiménez (boxer) WP:NBOX||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2298 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cezar Dior [[User talk:Becky Sayles|''' B E C K Y S A Y L E S ''']] 01:59, 5 January 2015 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Cezar Dior WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2299 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phantom fungus User:Gavin 11:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC) delete as ghits show that no |reliable secondary sources exist to demonstrate |notability outside of the game. Shame it can't speak or sing, otherwise this could be merged with ''Little Shop of Horrors (musical Deletion of Phantom fungus WP:RS||WP:FICT Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2300 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ceramic chemistry User:Mike 20:50, 14 February 2013 (UTC) comment More than enough exist to write a detailed article about the chemistry of ceramics, including: http://books.google.com/books?id=TYUvAQAAIAAJ ''The Chemistry of Ceramics'' (Wiley, 1996), http://books.google.com/books?id=Q58c6SBVnC0C ''Chemical Processing of Ceramics'' (CRC 2010), http://books.google.com/books?id=-kkNAQAAIAAJ ''High temperature chemistry of inorganic and ceramic materials'' (Chemical Society, 1977) and the older http://books.google.com/books?id=uCJDAAAAIAAJ ''Ceramic Chemistry'' (Davis Bros., 1912). I agree with comments on the Talk page that the article as it is currently written has serious issues, but it may still have were it to be rewritten; quality problems can be |surmounted by ordinary editing. My concern is that the topic may not be sufficiently differentiated from material already covered in other articles such as Ceramic, Ceramic materials and Ceramic engineering to warrant a separate Ceramic chemistry article Deletion of Ceramic chemistry WP:RS||WP:POTENTIAL||WP:SURMOUNTABLE Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2301 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lloyd R. Woodson User:Contains 08:48, 2 February 2010 (UTC) keep """this is a topic of ongoing public interest. Woodson may be notable only for one event, but in the absence of any obvious target for a move or redirect, I think it's appropriate that his name should be the article title. This clearly goes way beyond an ordinary """"guy gets arrested for unlicensed gun collection"""" news story. Wikipedia is |not news but we do have many articles on notable events which have been reported in the news, and rightly so; and significantly, we also have a |neutral point of view policy which is enforced usually quite effectively through collective editing. Maintaining this article on a notable subject serves the public interest""" Deletion of Lloyd R. Woodson WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NPOV Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2302 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Late july 2009 severe storms User:Rodhullandemu 21:00, 23 May 2010 (UTC) delete poorly-sourced single event with no long-term or widespread effects. Fails as well as Deletion of Late july 2009 severe storms WP:LOCAL||WP:N Wikipedia:Places of local interest 41 +2303 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bomma Borusa User:MichaelQSchmidt 07:27, 26 December 2008 (UTC) comment I just completed some cleanup and sourcing per film MOS. However, I will not judge this 37-year-old film by an http://www.dinakaran.com/cinema/english/cinebio/23-06-99/balacha2.htm award-winning K. Balachander as non-notable simply because I cannot read Telugu and am unable to discern the content of the non-English sources. That it was made by a man who has won numerous awards, and has numerous Telugu notables in it would seem to indicate in |assuming good faith that the sources are out there... just not in English. Cultural bias is a tough trap to fall into... so I won't Deletion of Bomma Borusa WP:AGF Wikipedia:Assume good faith 53 +2304 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim Guardian User:I 17:43, 8 September 2006 (UTC) delete cruft factory, see also for why this shouldn't be on wikipedia Deletion of Muslim Guardian WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2305 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Rhea User:TrackerTV 19:51, 2 January 2007 (UTC) delete per nom. This is clearly a |conflict of interest, as Foleyef can be rearranged to E.F. Foley or Edward F. Foley. This is also patent |original research from there. « Deletion of Joseph Rhea WP:COI||WP:OR Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +2306 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur J. Williams User:Finnegas 14:44, 1 September 2013 (UTC) keep Agree with views expressed above. Satisfies as a member of the North Carolina General Assembly Deletion of Arthur J. Williams WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2307 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan Branco User:David 00:20, 24 February 2016 (UTC) delete Sources do not bear out the significance claimed in the article. He clearly does not pass , but it looks like he also does not pass , and in any case the article needs to remove all the self-promotion Deletion of Juan Branco WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:TNT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2308 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TuneCore (2nd nomination) User:TenPoundHammer 02:26, 16 August 2007 (UTC) keep per the tiger. Passes , doesn't seem overly spammy Deletion of TuneCore (2nd nomination) WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2309 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bombilla & Gourd Mate Tea User:Bearian 02:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC) delete it's not ''too'' smammy, but |the sources are very weak. It tastes like a |local beverage company to me Deletion of Bombilla & Gourd Mate Tea WP:RS||WP:CORP Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2310 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JUST EAT India User:Northamerica1000 05:47, 7 December 2013 (UTC) comment Per , perhaps a merge to Just-Eat should occur, rather than blanket deletion of the content Deletion of JUST EAT India WP:PRESERVE Wikipedia:Editing policy 24 +2311 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blacksteel and Badger User:Quarl NONE delete per The Anome - |non-notable band, |vanity. &mdash Deletion of Blacksteel and Badger WP:MUSIC||WP:VAIN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2312 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard T. Snodgrass User:Agricola44 14:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC) keep """This is a slam dunk. The enormous citation base to his work is sufficient (GS h-index seems to be around 25): it is independent, verifiable, as well as being conclusive proof of impact. This indeed is the long-established standard test of #1, which the subject conspicuously satisfies. ACM Fellow would also be a pass (as would """"Fellow""""-level election in any of the main scientific societies). Respectfully""" Deletion of Richard T. Snodgrass WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2313 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Society for Venturism User:DCI2026 00:00, 15 February 2013 (UTC) comment The above keep !votes do not establish why the article ought not to be deleted. First, the sources on the article really aren't reliable. Yahoo posts about Toronto's Bedford Day parties and wikis, postings, and articles from affiliates of this organization are not considered |in line with WP policy. As for the argument stating that an appropriate analogy is the Catholic Church article being sourced by other denominations' webpages, these, too, would not be considered reliable. Basically, this article needs sources from a well-established source not affiliated with the Society of Venturism or its affiliates in the cryonics movement, and clear indications that the topic has garnered sufficient notability Deletion of Society for Venturism WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2314 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Football at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Men's tournament User:Jkudlick 03:21, 22 March 2016 (UTC) delete There isn't even a stand-alone article for the 2016 Men's and Women's tournaments, and the only thing known about 2020 is that the Games will be in Japan. This is far , so much so that the hasn't been made yet. —  Deletion of Football at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Men's tournament WP:TOOSOON||WP:CRYSTALBALL Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +2315 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Behm User:Yoninah 17:50, 25 February 2017 (UTC) delete per . I tried to add additional sources to beef up this article, but she just sounds like a local personality who's running a restaurant and appearing in some shows. Winning Master Chef does not confer notability Deletion of Jennifer Behm WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2316 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Console wars User:Sergecross73 02:11, 9 July 2013 (UTC) delete completely redundant to the video game generation articles, and manages to be even more based off of Deletion of Console wars WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2317 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Armenian Americans User:Badagnani 01:21, 13 September 2007 (UTC) keep """Important aid for researchers. We only include notable individuals in these lists and they are well sourced. As with previous ethnic group nominations, this nomination, apparently done along with dozens if not hundreds of others all in a single day, is disruptive, , and does not enhance our encyclopedia. Editor apparently presumes that all Americans ''should'' simply be """"American,"""" and their national origin should be ignored. This attempt to inject political POV into the Wiki should be eschewed in the strongest terms. '''Improve, don't delete""" Deletion of List of Armenian Americans WP:POINT Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +2318 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professor A.L.I. User:Ohnoitsjamie 02:07, 8 December 2015 (UTC) delete None of the sources listed appear to meet guidelines Deletion of Professor A.L.I. WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2319 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JMU Party Posse User:Jjjsixsix 23:10, 21 May 2006 (UTC) delete basically a club, and maybe (for things made in school one day Deletion of JMU Party Posse WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2320 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mumbly Cartoon Show NONE NONE keep """per and sources currently cited in the article. NTV says, """"Generally, an individual radio or television program is likely to be notable if it airs on a network of radio or television stations (either national or regional in scope)."""" ''The Mumbly Cartoon Show'' aired on ABC. I've added some more information to the page using several sources, including""" Deletion of The Mumbly Cartoon Show WP:NTV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2321 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 California stabbing rampage user:Shrike 20:28, 9 August 2019 (UTC) keep Per also meets I added BBC source there are also Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/aug/08/california-stabbing-rampage-garden-grove Deletion of 2019 California stabbing rampage WP:RAPID||WP:DIVERSE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2322 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naomi Hunter User:Bearian 16:48, 14 September 2020 (UTC) delete per . We've been over this many times. State/provincial leaders of minor parties are almost never notable Deletion of Naomi Hunter WP:POLOUTCOMES Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +2323 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Obama Really Meant User:23skidoo 14:46, 13 April 2008 (UTC) delete There's no indication the term has entered into general use, and at least some of the sources cited probably wouldn't pass muster with . If the term gets picked up by more mainstream media, then let's revisit it. Otherwise I agree, this comes off as an anti-Obama attack disguised as an article. Otherwise let's wait and see if it gains the same sort of equity as Bushism, for example Deletion of What Obama Really Meant WP:SOURCES Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2324 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edi Birsan User:Colonel 15:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC) keep The topic is notable and, even it were not, there would be better alternatives to deletion per our policies and . The article just needs improvement per and so I shall do some work upon it Deletion of Edi Birsan WP:BEFORE||WP:PRESERVE||WP:IMPERFECT Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +2325 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thy Catafalque User:Blackmetalbaz 17:51, 10 August 2010 (UTC) comment The ezines clearly do not pass in any way, shape or form. Prog Archives, like Discogs, MusicMight and Metal Archives do also not confer notability. That leaves the Hungarian sources, which I confess I am struggling to evaluate... being distributed worldwide is not a signifier of notability, and having released four albums is not grounds for invoking in the absence of coverage in |reliable sources; in this case Hungarian media will be fine, as long as it is not simply a webzine. Print media distributed by a third-party source is your friend Deletion of Thy Catafalque WP:RS||WP:IAR||WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2326 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riz Mokal User:Can 21:10, 14 May 2020 (UTC) delete Per . {{Template:replyto|replyto| Deletion of Riz Mokal WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +2327 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FreeFileSync User:StayAwhileAndListen 22:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC) keep per ; as mentioned by Deletion of FreeFileSync WP:NSOFT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2328 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darwin Brown User:Canadian 21:24, 24 January 2009 (UTC) delete per . It's pretty much all been said. Cheers Deletion of Darwin Brown WP:ONEEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2329 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get On Your Boots User:Esradekan 07:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC) keep while technically correct, I believe this is a time for |common sense and |ignore all the rules Deletion of Get On Your Boots WP:COMMON||WP:IAR "Wikipedia:What ""Ignore all rules"" means" 27 +2330 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lancelin Boys Weekend User:Spongefrog 10:05, 5 December 2009 (UTC) delete Doesn't seem to be very |notable. No relevant, usable google hits. Can't find significant coverage Deletion of Lancelin Boys Weekend WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2331 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CookiePie User:Sebastianwain NONE comment What? Are you saying that the amount of time I spend on Wikipedia is administrative privilege? And one of the other things Wikipedia is clear about is |assume good faith. Besides, the articles haven't actually been removed yet, this is the process to see whether they will get removed. This is what happened: after I read Deletion of CookiePie WP:AGF Wikipedia:Assume good faith 53 +2332 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flaming Guitar User:Kizor 19:26, 20 August 2010 (UTC) delete """Forget notability: this one runs into |verifiability, the cornerstone of the project and one of the few Rules that define a good article instead of getting used as a club by deletion-happy (sorry, past trauma) being intended as a tool to help make good articles. V basically means that the word of an open wiki is not good for much. All articles have to be able to give a proper answer to the question """"Says who?"""" This is no minor issue. Check out the scam attempts after the Boxing Day tsunami, or better yet, don't. ''Flaming Guitar'' doesn't seem to have any third-party sources backing it up, nor can we expect it to acquire any in a reasonable length of time. If the authors or other people are interested in acquiring a copy of the article after the AfD closes, feel free to ask me or another admin""" Deletion of Flaming Guitar WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2333 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parramatta Citadel Band User:VirtualSteve 06:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC) delete Not notable, seems to be edited by a person with a |relationship to the article contents, and has considerable |original research components Deletion of Parramatta Citadel Band WP:COI||WP:OR Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +2334 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryanair Flight 4102 (2nd nomination) User:Mjroots 17:06, 7 October 2020 (UTC) keep An aircraft that is almost new was written off. Such a course of action is not taken lightly. This is not your |run of the mill birdstrike. Lack of fatalities ≠ lack of notability Deletion of Ryanair Flight 4102 (2nd nomination) WP:MILL Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill 32 +2335 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Statistics Discussion Lists User:GRBerry 02:04, 17 September 2006 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Statistics Discussion Lists WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2336 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shifty Eyes User:The 10:45, 2 September 2018 (UTC) delete per nomination, since subject |verifiably fails Deletion of Shifty Eyes WP:V||WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2337 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seydibesir POW Camp User:Ddcm8991 17:40, 21 September 2015 (UTC) delete Fails , and Deletion of Seydibesir POW Camp WP:V||WP:EVENT||WP:NOR Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2338 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aishwarya Sheoran User:Robert 15:34, 7 August 2020 (UTC) delete WP:MILL|Run-of-the-mill model and beauty contestant. The article says that she scored 93 on what appears to be the national civil service exam, and that she was a beauty contestant. Google search shows that she exists and uses social media, and that she was a beauty contestant and that she scored 93 on what appears to be the national civil service exam. Nothing is |notable about having been a finalist in a beauty contest. No ontext|context is provided as to what a score of 93 signifies or what the distribution of scores is (but the number was probably meant to dazzle or amaze rather than to inform Deletion of Aishwarya Sheoran WP:N||WP:C Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2339 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religious communism User:Omni 10:27, 4 July 2016 (UTC) keep Obviously hasn't been followed here. Yes, the article is in a very poor shape, but it undoubtedly meets . Just take a look at a https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=Religious_communism Google Books search Deletion of Religious communism WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +2340 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riley Shy User:Cerebellum 01:06, 14 September 2013 (UTC) delete Seems to fail Deletion of Riley Shy WP:PORNBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2341 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of official record charts User:Aquasplash 21:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC) delete If the external links are not removed and it is made into a proper list and not displayed like a category, then it would meet the |criteria but at the minute it fails #LINK|Wikipedia is not a place for external links Deletion of List of official record charts WP:NOT||WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2342 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad born User:MichaelQSchmidt 16:14, 29 April 2014 (UTC) delete I agree after a lot of digging that at the very kindest this film topic article is |TOO SOON Deletion of Bad born WP:NYF Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +2343 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuukit User:Stuartyeates 07:40, 8 July 2012 (UTC) delete as lacking indepth coverage in independent third party sources, as required by Deletion of Fuukit WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2344 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karina Kay User:Tatarian 17:17, 16 October 2008 (UTC) keep Passes Deletion of Karina Kay WP:PORNBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2345 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don't Stop Rappin' User:Azealia911 01:40, 27 July 2015 (UTC) merge to Too Short, fails and Deletion of Don't Stop Rappin' WP:GNG||WP:NALBUMS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2346 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Patent Marketing User:Smartse 12:37, 24 March 2021 (UTC) keep since no policy based argument is made for deletion. is clearly met per the references I'd included in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=World_Patent_Marketing&oldid=867771855 this version Deletion of World Patent Marketing WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2347 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panniwala Ruldu [[User talk:Usernamekiran|'''(talk)''']] 21:57, 29 June 2019 (UTC) keep passes as a village that can be verified per Phil's comment above. —usernamekiran Deletion of Panniwala Ruldu WP:GEOLAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2348 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reactive mind User:Riffic 15:23, 19 June 2009 (UTC) delete Wikipedia is |not for things made up one day Deletion of Reactive mind WP:MADEUP Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +2349 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The many deaths of jordan User:Hello32020 16:01, 2 September 2006 (UTC) delete not-notable , etc. etc Deletion of The many deaths of jordan WP:NOT||WP:NFT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2350 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chivalry-Now User:MelanieN 23:13, 14 October 2012 (UTC) delete This is not a notable organization as defined by Wikipedia, see . The organization has not received the required |significant coverage by multiple independent reliable sources. In fact it has received close to zero coverage; all I found was http://www.shorelinetimes.com/articles/2010/06/10/life/doc4c11071327e42661439767.txt this, from a small local paper and not written by the paper's staff so it might not be independent. Aside from the lack of notability this article suffers from a lot of unsourced |original research and a frankly promotional tone Deletion of Chivalry-Now WP:ORG||WP:42||WP:OR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2351 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The blackmarket kidney User:Bfigura 05:08, 30 April 2008 (UTC) delete Again, notable topic, and I'd suggest merging some of the info. But since it's not really apparent what references back up what statement, it's probably worth just deletiing this |synthetic |essay Deletion of The blackmarket kidney WP:SYNTH||WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2352 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I and Thou (band) User:Spinningspark 08:54, 6 May 2014 (UTC) keep """Meets criteria #6: """"contains two or more independently notable musicians"""". Two members have articles and two more belong to bands that have articles""" Deletion of I and Thou (band) WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2353 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katharina Leiding User:Grailcombs 17:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC) delete Current sources and his sports achievements doesn't qualify for and Deletion of Katharina Leiding WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2354 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Gotshall I User:141 22:13, 21 September 2006 (UTC) delete at least until Destish Media becomes notable, or is does his company fail Deletion of Brad Gotshall I WP:NFT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +2355 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Society for Venturism User:Chiswick 15:10, 18 February 2013 (UTC) delete This appears to be pure ; the sources appear to be entirely within that fringe world, and the keep reasons appear to be even where lack of is accepted. It is difficult to see how anything other than delete could reasonably result under WP policy, though perhaps a merge to Cryonics would work Deletion of Society for Venturism WP:FRINGE||WP:ITSUSEFUL||WP:NOTABILITY Wikipedia:Fringe theories 44 +2356 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ammini College of Engineering User:Adamant1 22:11, 1 April 2021 (UTC) delete There isn't even the usual trivial sources about this that exist for some school. Let alone anything in-depth. So, the article should clearly be deleted. Unless someone can find in-depth, reliable, non-trivial, independent sources so it will pass . I'm more then happy change my vote to keep if anyone can Deletion of Ammini College of Engineering WP:THREE||WP:NORG Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2357 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic: The Gathering deck types (4rd nomination) User:Hornpipe2 20:07, 11 August 2017 (UTC) delete """Basically . The article is not necessary """"bad"""" and the editors have clearly gone to great lengths to source info and make it seem as notable and legit as possible - but at the end of the day, the subject itself is just Too Niche to warrant its own space. No amount of citations from WotC and Star City Games is going to help with that aspect. See also Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Yu-Gi-Oh!_Deck_Formats_and_Strategies""" Deletion of Magic: The Gathering deck types (4rd nomination) WP:NOTABLE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2358 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Find and replace User:I 09:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC) delete I'm in agreement with JIP. Find and replace is undoubtedly a useful feature in word processing, but the article falls in line with both and Deletion of Find and replace WP:NOTHOWTO||WP:NOTDIC Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2359 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connections between 24 and La Femme Nikita User:TenPoundHammer 00:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC) delete I agree, this is pure and trivia. It's like the similarities between Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy. (Did you know that their last names both had seven letters? Neither did I Deletion of Connections between 24 and La Femme Nikita WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2360 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Nikolaos of Greece and Denmark User:Bearian 17:50, 10 August 2011 (UTC) delete most royals of all stripes are, in fact kept with their own articles, as noted by Postdlf, and all were kept until c. June 2010, when the prior |Wikipedia precedent was that all royals were presumed notable. While |the consensus seems to have changed, at least for ''not-sitting'' royals, I ''don't'' want this (or his brother's case) to be bad precedent. Sitting royals still enjoy the presumption of notability, like First Ladies, |members of the British House of Lords, and other acknowledged and proven nobility Deletion of Prince Nikolaos of Greece and Denmark WP:OUTCOMES||WP:CCC||WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +2361 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bifrost (band) User:JamesBurns 09:06, 7 March 2009 (UTC) delete no significant independent 3rd party coverage Deletion of Bifrost (band) WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2362 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivien Saunders User:Nigej 07:25, 8 May 2017 (UTC) keep Satisfies . Category 1: Competed in Curtis Cup. Category 3: Won Women's British Open. Category 5: Probably, need to check. Category 6: Played on the LPGA Tour. One of the leading British lady golfers of her era. Just because there's little about Women's golf on the internet is no reason to exclude her Deletion of Vivien Saunders WP:NGOLF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2363 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jumbo Lake User:Reywas92 07:38, 8 September 2019 (UTC) delete I don't really care if it stays as a redirect or not, but it's blatantly obvious that this fails , with no sources of any substance describing the lake itself, only a database entry with its name and coordinates. Precisely zero of the information previously making up the article was about the Lake, rather the general geography of that region of Quebec, making this a textbook example of a , exaggerating content and references on tangential information that do not actually support the notability of the subject – or even provide any information about it, unlike the countless Billy Hathorn biographies Deletion of Jumbo Lake WP:GEOLAND||WP:REFBOMB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2364 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICracked User:K 04:06, 30 October 2016 (UTC) delete per ; a vanity page that is being used for promotion. Sources do not meet but simply illustrate that the company exists Deletion of ICracked WP:PROMO||WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2365 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contemporary Fighting Arts (2nd nomination) User:Astudent0 13:35, 4 May 2010 (UTC) delete This art appears to be taught at 1 school and has no independent coverage, except for the local papers. Clearly fails Deletion of Contemporary Fighting Arts (2nd nomination) WP:MANOTE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2366 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Au Revoir User:Esradekan 02:33, 8 April 2009 (UTC) delete fails notability per #Songs. No awards, no chart, no covers, no Deletion of Au Revoir WP:MUSIC||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2367 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shane O'Looney User:Quarl NONE delete as |non-notable vanity biography. &mdash Deletion of Shane O'Looney WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2368 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Am The Sea User:Ritchie333 15:20, 19 January 2017 (UTC) merge """to Quadrophenia per , and for homework consider having a similar debate about """"Speak to Me""" Deletion of I Am The Sea WP:NSONGS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2369 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Gow User:Strothra 01:33, 23 June 2006 (UTC) delete as per and Hillman as well as and Deletion of James Gow WP:BIO||WP:CITE||WP:VERIFY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2370 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC 143 User:TreyGeek 01:32, 23 April 2012 (UTC) delete """The article contains mostly statistics (fight results, payouts and awards) and generally lacks """"well sourced prose"""" as requested by for notable events""" Deletion of UFC 143 WP:SPORTSEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2371 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tricia Miranda [[User talk:198.84.253.202|talk]]) 15:51, 21 January 2018 (UTC) delete Being credited or not is irrelevant - if sources only mention article subject with a passing mention while talking of something else, subject fails (lacking significant, lasting coverage about the subject) and, of course, |notability isn't inherited. Special:Contributions/198.84.253.202|198.84.253.202 Deletion of Tricia Miranda WP:GNG||WP:INHERITED Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2372 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oliver Konteh User:Sir 15:40, 9 December 2012 (UTC) delete per nom. He has received insufficient coverage to pass and all claims to notability under are unverified Deletion of Oliver Konteh WP:GNG||WP:NSPORT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2373 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Racial Contract [[User talk:Czar|czar]] 19:34, 24 October 2017 (UTC) keep Added six academic reviews from JSTOR, which should be sufficient for |significant coverage. If anyone wants more book reviews, let me know and I can dig deeper Deletion of The Racial Contract WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2374 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Principal clock User:Footlessmouse 21:17, 29 October 2020 (UTC) delete per . If moving the content to Wikitionary is an option, go for it, but remove the page from this encyclopedia, as it is not a dictionary Deletion of Principal clock WP:NOTDICT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +2375 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Nitrate Prize User:Blue520 06:50, 18 April 2006 (UTC) delete """seems to have problems with & may fall under - crystal ball as the article notes """"A group is forming to determine the rules of the competition and to raise money for the prize""" Deletion of Digital Nitrate Prize WP:V||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2376 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. N. Kellett Elementary School (2nd nomination) User:Spyder_Monkey 19:15, 8 February 2012 (UTC) merge to Seneca, South Carolina per #Schools Deletion of J. N. Kellett Elementary School (2nd nomination) WP:OUTCOMES Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +2377 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gianni Cicogna User:Fosse8 10:01, 13 April 2012 (UTC) delete non-notable session musician and music teacher, no reliable sources and no indication of notability. Fails GNG and Deletion of Gianni Cicogna WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2378 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/7th Son (Podiobook) User:SkierRMH 09:19, 8 January 2007 (UTC) delete Couldn't get any ghits for this, ergo amongst the aforementioned Deletion of 7th Son (Podiobook) WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2379 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jewish Bolshevism (2nd nomination) User:IZAK 19:15, 7 October 2013 (UTC) merge """to Jewish Bolshevism#The Jewish Bolshevism. I have extracted and transferred all the key information into that sub-section (part of Jewish Bolshevism#Works that propagate Jewish Bolshevism) which is more befitting WP's reader-friendly style with sufficient space for this minor topic. The so-called """"Bibliography"""" here is just padding that violates and . In fact, this article could ''very easily'' fit somewhere into the more important topic of Nazi propaganda#Media as one concise paragraph. As the article stands now, it seems that quite possibly it is trying to sneak in and propagate its contents in unnecessary detail in violation of in a more subtle fashion as well""" Deletion of The Jewish Bolshevism (2nd nomination) WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:NOTTEXTBOOK||WP:NOTSOAPBOX Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2380 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Youngtron User:The 15:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC) delete as failing as |non notable Deletion of Youngtron WP:CORP||WP:NN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2381 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bojo User:Dustimagic 19:40, 7 March 2006 (UTC) delete per nom, Deletion of Bojo WP:HOAX Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes 40 +2382 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsubee U User:MichaelQSchmidt 07:30, 11 August 2012 (UTC) delete No reliable sources offering |verifiability. Fails Deletion of Tsubee U WP:V||WP:BLP Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2383 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Callan User:Ohconfucius 08:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC) delete """schoolboy and """"writer of local acclaim"""". Nothing but LOCAL media coverage and LOCAL student awards, thus fails to pass """ Deletion of Jonathan Callan WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2384 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masseratti 2lts User:Armbrust 15:37, 23 September 2010 (UTC) delete as article fails |notability criteria for bands Deletion of Masseratti 2lts WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2385 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of nascent delta functions NONE NONE delete Regardless of the fact that it's a fork (not necessarily a ) of Dirac delta function, and the history supplied by the nominator, the article doesn't stand on it's own. For (almost) ''any'' probability density function \varphi Deletion of List of nascent delta functions WP:CFORK Wikipedia:Content forking 33 +2386 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StarFighter: Quadrant Wars User:RGTraynor 15:26, 6 July 2007 (UTC) delete I just went through each and every unique Google hit on this game (given that there are only 44, it didn't take ''that'' long). Not a single one of them is from a reliable source. For all the SPA partisans claim that they can source this article to reliable sources -- and for the record, we're talking major gaming magazines, mass media, and the like -- they've yet to do so. The game's website isn't even on the Alexa chart. I'm quite willing to believe that there are a dozen fanatics who demonstrably really love this game, but I'm waiting for anyone to state the criteria at or this obscure game meets Deletion of StarFighter: Quadrant Wars WP:V||WP:WEB Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2387 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hand Hug User:SoSaysChappy 04:57, 17 December 2009 (UTC) delete """per nom. Although there is a Facebook """"following"""", the gesture doesn't seem notable enough to break beyond status. With time, if it becomes more common and significant, it might warrant an article. For now, at the most, merge the GBooks info about establishing this gesture with children into the Hug article""" Deletion of Hand Hug WP:MADEUP Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +2388 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Velvet Abstract User:The 16:35, 25 August 2006 (UTC) delete No |notablitiy, and fails Deletion of The Velvet Abstract WP:NN||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2389 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summersteps Records User:Joe 00:29, 25 January 2010 (UTC) delete Having two notable acts doesn't equal notability per Deletion of Summersteps Records WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2390 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Necrosis (band) (2nd nomination) User:Nosebagbear 12:23, 3 May 2019 (UTC) delete and salt'') - {{ping|Shirt58}} - me and Salvidrim felt this was actually a different article, but I'll focus on it in current form in any case. Notability clearly not established - distinct failure to satisfy Deletion of Necrosis (band) (2nd nomination) WP:NBAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2391 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tech Compiler Data Systems User:Harsh_2580 22:31, 26 November 2014 (UTC) delete Not notable and unsourced Deletion of Tech Compiler Data Systems WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2392 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R.S. Praveen Kumar User:K 21:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC) delete """a BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. The coverage is passing mentions and / or . Agree with nom: this has the hallmarks of COI / UPE, with troubling creation history and language such as """"...widely known as the brain behind the success story of the Everest conquerors""" Deletion of R.S. Praveen Kumar WP:SPIP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2393 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dogecoindark User:Dialectric 15:23, 17 July 2015 (UTC) delete Software (electronic currency) article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. The one ref listing blocks is not RS, nor significant coverage. A search turned up no significant coverage. Article was created by an Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|SPA as possibly promotional Deletion of Dogecoindark WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2394 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piper Perri User:Gene93k 17:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC) delete Just enough notability asserted to avoid an A7 speedy. No claim of or WP:ENT notability supported by available RS coverage. An independent search yielded only trivial mentions Deletion of Piper Perri WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2395 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firdaus Kharas User:LeQuattroStagioni 18:28, 20 December 2019 (UTC) delete """First I sensed a Conflict of interest as per - The creator's name is the same (refer history), later """"he"""" change to """"User:Vinlev"""" - refer to WikiCommons, you will see '''Vinlev''' is '''Firdaus Kharas''' (the author and the source of all the photos uploaded). Secondly, the article has been rewritten and revised again and again; and the final outcome is like what it is now (a """"stub"""" resume). If this person is really notable, it should have been easy to write about him but from how I see it, he is not. Moving to draft may or may not help unless if there is someone who are committed to rewrite it again - this article was created 13 years ago but yet no one was willing to improve it (except User:Vinlev). For now, I would say """"Delete"""" is the best vote""" Deletion of Firdaus Kharas WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +2396 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia community User:JoshuaZ 00:12, 11 March 2007 (UTC) comment Could you explain what {WP:OR|original research is in the article? Also, as I have pointed out before is a style issue, it says nothing about not having well-sourced, well-cited articles like Wikipedia and Jimbo Wales Deletion of Wikipedia community WP:SELF Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +2397 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relationship of Clark Kent and Lois Lane (2nd nomination) User:Dennis 22:14, 1 June 2013 (UTC) keep per my rationale at the last AFD. The relationship is notable and is a major portion of the franchise itself, even if difficult to source. Even with the amount of work needed, the topic meets GNG, and |there is no deadline Deletion of Relationship of Clark Kent and Lois Lane (2nd nomination) WP:DEADLINE Wikipedia:There is no deadline 81 +2398 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Are You Ready (Hannah Montana song) User:onel5969 00:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC) merge to the album, ''Hannah Montana Forever''. SPA apparently disingenuously simply slapped some chart information on the article which is unsupported by citations, or by searches. Another song by this artist did chart at #66 on ''US Billboard Hot 100'', but that was ''Gonna Get This'', the week of 11/6/2010, see https://www.billboard.com/charts/hot-100/2010-11-06?rank=66 here. The other 2 are not major charts, so would not count towards . So it doesn't meet that SNG or Deletion of Are You Ready (Hannah Montana song) WP:NSONG||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2399 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acousticophilia User:Guest9999 12:56, 1 March 2008 (UTC) delete one trivial mention inhttp://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1911674.cms other than that I can't find any references to suggest the phenomenon is |notable - there is no evidence of significant coverage by |reliable, independent sources Deletion of Acousticophilia WP:NN||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2400 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edmund Keli’i Silva Jr. (2nd nomination) User:Bearian 16:23, 30 September 2015 (UTC) delete per . Too long, I could not finish reading this |soapboxing essay Deletion of Edmund Keli’i Silva Jr. (2nd nomination) WP:TNT||WP:SOAP Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +2401 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloody Stupid Johnson User:MacGyverMagic 23:51, 16 November 2008 (UTC) merge to List of Discworld characters (per Deletion of Bloody Stupid Johnson WP:FICT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2402 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leviak B. Kelly User:MelanieN 19:29, 7 June 2015 (UTC) delete """Fails / There are literally NO independent reliable sources about this person or his book. The references at the article are an interview by """"The Pew"""", which doesn't seem to exist except for that one youtube interview; Createspace, a self-publisher; and Religion the Ultimate STD, the author's or book's own web page. The Keep arguments from the SPAs are unconvincing and not policy based""" Deletion of Leviak B. Kelly WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2403 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reality-based community (3rd nomination) User:XavierItzm 10:22, 13 September 2017 (UTC) keep Agree that the contemporaneous sources more than guarantee the entry should be kept on grounds of ; plus the cite from September 2017 from The Atlantic right there holds that the term was historic for over a decade, remains current, and that it must be kept forever. It is true that some of its adherents may finally have come to realize how embarrassing their self-given motto always was, but that should be no grounds for its expunging from the Wikipedia Deletion of Reality-based community (3rd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2404 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kulaxingu Kambamjiji User:Anakin101 13:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC) delete per , as well. The single reference in that book is too fleeting and obscure. Maybe they simply transcribed his name in a non-standard way and that's why we can't find anything more about him. But it's not a good idea to have an article for that one reference (other people could copy Wikipedia and confuse the situation even more Deletion of Kulaxingu Kambamjiji WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2405 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/María Sáez de Vernet User:Cwmhiraeth 07:00, 5 August 2018 (UTC) keep Seems to be a significant figure in her own right with her diaries providing historically interesting detail. Appears to meet Deletion of María Sáez de Vernet WP:NBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2406 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Teeters User:Trackinfo 07:28, 22 February 2017 (UTC) keep """Nom has misspoken. As Jrheller notes, the 60 metres is an IAAF World Indoor Championships event. So being ranked in the top 6 in the world on the annual list clearly passes #8. The current champion is Trayvon Bromell, who Teeters ran against in the same collegiate conference many times. I believe (based on so far, unreliable blog sources, so I haven't added it to the article) Teeters holds victories over the world champion Bromell and over triple Olympic medalist Andre De Grasse. As you know NTRACK is based on the presumption of meeting . Google his name and you will find pages of coverage, a lot of it related to his being """"the fastest white American of all time."""" Because of the racial component, I added that to the article as a quote. So even beyond the specific of NTRACK, he clearly also meets GNG""" Deletion of John Teeters WP:NTRACK||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2407 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gershon Wiesenfeld User:David 16:45, 21 January 2011 (UTC) comment """Your argument 1 is patently false. There is neither an implied requirement nor a presumption that someone be an expert on an article to edit. In fact this is stated right on the Wikipedia:Introduction|WP Intro Page, in , etc. In essence, nobody any particular article. Arguments 2, 3, and 5 build further upon the concept you are trying to push, attempt to discredit people who would apply WP policies, and basically plead the """"just give it more time"""" position. Argument 4 tries to shift the burden away from those who wrote the article from the responsibility of documenting it and to instead cast any skeptics as mean-spirited editors who don't care. I'll not have it and here's why. Invariably, these articles have no because there ''is'' no out there to be had. To """"just give it more time"""" is to stall. Take the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tzvi Berkowitz|Berkowitz article again as an example. It ''still'' has no reliable sources that demonstrate notability, despite the fact that I raised this issue last May and even took it to AfD! This is predictably when the special pleading|pleading starts regarding how regular policies shouldn't apply in this case. The AfD archive is ''full'' of instances like this. I'm afraid what this boils down to is no , no article. I think again that our dear colleague""" Deletion of Gershon Wiesenfeld WP:BOLD||WP:OWNS||WP:OWNERSHIP||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:RS Wikipedia:Be bold 78 +2408 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjaan (1956 film) User:Spiderone 11:50, 16 July 2020 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Anjaan (1956 film) WP:NFILM||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2409 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabricio Fernández User:Fenix 17:47, 20 February 2015 (UTC) delete Player fails as has not played in a |fully professional league, nor senior international football. No indication of any other achievements that have garnered sufficient, significant coverage to satisfy Deletion of Fabricio Fernández WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2410 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan Ace User:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 01:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC) delete per and lack of . Also, it's blatant ; is there a speedy criterion for deleting spam Deletion of Dylan Ace WP:LIVING||WP:RS||WP:VSCA Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +2411 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exodus Geohaghon User:Peanut4 13:48, 21 December 2008 (UTC) keep although he doesn't meet , he easily passes Deletion of Exodus Geohaghon WP:ATHLETE||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2412 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AnimeB User:Mkdw 08:03, 8 March 2007 (UTC) delete per and Deletion of AnimeB WP:NEO||WP:WEB Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +2413 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reference point User:RayAYang 21:25, 12 July 2008 (UTC) delete It is indeed already over at Wiktionary. Isn't |Speedy deletion criteria A5 for this specific case Deletion of Reference point WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +2414 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troubled identity User:Fbifriday 06:29, 29 November 2009 (UTC) delete Most sources appear to be myspace, facebook, or self-generated sources. Fails Deletion of Troubled identity WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2415 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergio Ortega Leguias User:Struway2 20:58, 17 November 2018 (UTC) keep Subject has represented his country at senior international level, thus passing , and there seems to be a reasonable amount of RS coverage at non-trivial level to suggest a GNG pass even at my limited free-online access to Panamanian media. Incidentally, the nomination refers to an incomplete speedy deletion: I see no sign of any such thing in the article history. cheers Deletion of Sergio Ortega Leguias WP:NFOOTY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2416 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zones of EverQuest User:Edward321 06:09, 10 November 2007 (UTC) keep Nominator appears to have a serious agenda since they talk of nominating over 100 articles for deletion, which will overwhelm the system. Reasons given by nominator |unsourced, |original research, and |fancruft are grounds for improvement, not deletion, and by nominator's own admission may not be relevant to this article. Nominator claims |unnotable and yet provides no indication of what notability criteria they think this article fails. Most importantly claim by nominator that topic is non-notable because non-fans would not read it shows a lack of understanding of notability. I am not a fan of hip-hop or opera - but the 'fact' that only fans would read those articles does not mean those articles are non-notable Deletion of Zones of EverQuest WP:SOURCE||WP:OR||WP:CRUFT||WP:N Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2417 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Warfield User:Cwmhiraeth 14:46, 22 December 2019 (UTC) delete seems to have only had minor roles and fails to meet Deletion of Joe Warfield WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2418 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Liepa User:TenPoundHammer 21:35, 23 May 2009 (UTC) merge to Pringles per and . Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Many otters • :User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat Deletion of Alexander Liepa WP:RS||WP:PUTEFFORT Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2419 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corinne Narassiguin User:Northamerica1000 11:06, 15 May 2012 (UTC) keep The topic appears to pass . (Multiple sources/articles can be used to establish topic notability Deletion of Corinne Narassiguin WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2420 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States presidential election, 2024 (2nd nomination) User:Anarchyte 07:18, 26 May 2016 (UTC) delete and temp salt. Deletion of United States presidential election, 2024 (2nd nomination) WP:CRYSTALBALL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2421 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Tabone User:Angelo 15:42, 20 October 2008 (UTC) delete """Maltese League is ''not'' fully professional, and playing the UEFA Cup qualifiers is way different than taking part in the full competition - even San Marino and Andorra teams compete in the qualifiers, and their players easily fail . In short, none of the competitions above (Malta Premier League and UEFA Cup Qualifiers) confer notability. About the """"reliable sources"""" provided by another user, they are: a personal blog, an article taken from the club website (definitely not a independent source), a Playerhistory.com page (a website that covers also non-notable subjects from several minor league teams, such as San Marino and the English Conference). The other two sources, taken from two Maltese newspaper websites, do not cover the subject in detail, but instead refer to him in a somewhat marginal way. So, he does not meet """ Deletion of Alan Tabone WP:N||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2422 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Cornerstone Institute User:Mrschimpf 22:23, 24 August 2021 (UTC) merge Just came into existence in February; we're not under to see if it does anything outside be a second line on the bottom-third graphic when Dr. Carson is on a show, and doesn't really serve a purpose Deletion of American Cornerstone Institute WP:DEADLINE Wikipedia:There is no deadline 81 +2423 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Ling (footballer) User:Hmlarson 01:42, 29 April 2017 (UTC) comment Here are some references to improve the article to meet (which trumps ) found from a Google News search. In my opinion, it should be improved, not deleted per . http://www.barkinganddagenhampost.co.uk/sport/football/dagenham-and-redbridge/dagenham-redbridge-boss-john-still-happy-to-bring-in-sam-ling-after-debut-in-win-over-dover-athletic-1-4695651 1, http://www.barkinganddagenhampost.co.uk/sport/football/dagenham-and-redbridge/dagenham-redbridge-defender-sam-ling-says-rehabiilitation-work-has-been-better-with-so-many-players-out-injured-1-4830527 2, http://www.barkinganddagenhampost.co.uk/sport/football/dagenham-and-redbridge/dagenham-redbridge-defender-sam-ling-says-there-is-no-added-pressure-on-squad-just-because-they-are-top-ahead-of-trip-to-bromley-1-4708016 3, http://www.barkinganddagenhampost.co.uk/sport/football/dagenham-and-redbridge/dagenham-redbridge-defender-sam-ling-admits-red-card-for-scott-doe-was-a-game-changer-1-4829720 4 Looks like there's also some potential hits on BBC - probably worth a bit more time adding sufficient references {{ping|DM Trix Deletion of Sam Ling (footballer) WP:GNG||WP:FOOTY||WP:ATD Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2424 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Spinnin' Records sublabels User:Ifnord 21:14, 18 July 2020 (UTC) merge what little non- information there is to Spinnin' Records Deletion of List of Spinnin' Records sublabels WP:INDISCRIMINATE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2425 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henrik Breimyr User:GiantSnowman 12:25, 16 December 2011 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Henrik Breimyr WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2426 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troll (2012 film) User:MichaelQSchmidt 03:44, 16 July 2011 (UTC) delete Way |too soon Deletion of Troll (2012 film) WP:TOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +2427 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dana Terrace User:AleatoryPonderings 16:09, 4 September 2020 (UTC) keep per #3 Deletion of Dana Terrace WP:NARTIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2428 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prof Irfan Shahid User:Pharaoh 10:47, 2 April 2015 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Prof Irfan Shahid WP:PROF||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2429 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slum (film) (2nd nomination) User:MichaelQSchmidt 09:25, 8 June 2014 (UTC) keep brand new article on released film that has enough coverage in reliable sources to meet . Sure, it was initially poorly sourced when first nominated, but when |they ARE available that is not a #REASON|deletion criteria, nor are the issues of an early different topic by this same name to be visited upon this new film article. We have |solutions that do not mandate a deletion Deletion of Slum (film) (2nd nomination) WP:NF||WP:NRVE||WP:DEL||WP:ATD Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2430 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institutions of learning in Pakistan during antiquity User:Adamant1 15:36, 12 May 2021 (UTC) merge to Ancient institutions of learning in the Indian subcontinent per Knox490, who's opinion I totally agree with. Also, I don't think it's historically correct to say these places had anything to do with Pakistan when they were around in pre-Pakistanian times. Anymore then it would be accurate for the United States to be cited as the originator or location of anything to do with pre-Colonialist Native American cultures, higher intuitions or otherwise. Doing so would both come off as nationalistic and |original research. That said, I'd cavate that the problem could potentially be solved through renaming the article and editing it to not have a nationalistic, original research bent to it, and I'm willing to give the creator the benefit of the doubt that they did not intend to write it that way, but I don't think it's necessary compared to just merging or redirecting it into the other article. Since keeping the article, especially as currently is (but even if it was heavily modified) clearly isn't the best option here Deletion of Institutions of learning in Pakistan during antiquity WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2431 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mac DVDRipper Pro User:OSborn 18:36, 16 December 2010 (UTC) comment Article creator is a probable |SPA: {{user|Macdvd}}. (Apparently now using the account {{user|Maknak Deletion of Mac DVDRipper Pro WP:SPA Wikipedia:Single-purpose account 21 +2432 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hellshire Hills User:SportingFlyer 07:16, 18 December 2018 (UTC) keep Appears in local news articles, easily passes Deletion of Hellshire Hills WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2433 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Spanish flu cases User:Levivich 17:19, 20 March 2020 (UTC) delete """This nomination isn't y, it's improving the encyclopedia. I agree with DJ and Goku's points that this list is just one among many, many inappropriate lists we have on Wikipedia. And there are many more of these past AFDs than Goku listed, e.g. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people with hepatitis C (kept 2006), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of HIV-positive people (kept 2011). """"Lists of people by disease"""" should all be deleted as morally repugnant. But aside from that, the nom and Andy make excellent points why this particular list of Spanish flu deaths from 100 years ago is trivial, indiscriminate, and fundamentally cannot comply with or or –the trifecta""" Deletion of List of Spanish flu cases WP:POINT||WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:DUE||WP:CCPOL Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +2434 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Hirsh (2nd nomination) User:Ad 05:21, 21 January 2014 (UTC) keep A quick Google turned up several stories about, and interviews with this guy in publications in the first couple pages of hits. He seems to have sufficient coverage to meet Deletion of Jesse Hirsh (2nd nomination) WP:RS||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2435 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elysian Coffee NONE NONE keep This article is modeled on the some of local coffee shops in the region (Pacific North West), as a part of the third wave coffee movement. While this is not an AfD for those specific local coffee shops, none of them have had issues proving for the same reason as this one. The key local coffee shops and roasters on whom this article has been modeled on are as below Deletion of Elysian Coffee WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2436 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charity Reuben User:Pharaoh 02:22, 2 August 2019 (UTC) keep Fails but scrapes thorugh Deletion of Charity Reuben WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2437 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camille Cleverley User:Edison 16:26, 18 September 2007 (UTC) delete """The article can be judged on its merits irrespective of any prior conflicts between the nominator and other editors. This is a tragic incident wherein a non-notable young person fell to her death in a possible accident. Hundreds of thousands of people annually die just as tragically in accidents and do not merit encyclopedia articles. Fox News or """"America's Most Wanted"""" selects stories to boost ratings, and encyclopedia editors have different criteria for what is notable or encyclopedic, as stated in the essay as well as the policy #NEWS. Wikipedia is neither a memorial site to remember the departed nor a news archive to forever report every accidental death. The fact that the media chose to print several stories about a missing young blond white woman does not mean that is satisfied""" Deletion of Camille Cleverley WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOT||WP:N Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2438 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lennox Farrell User:SyndicaterUI78 20:24, 13 May 2019 (UTC) delete Has no references and fails Deletion of Lennox Farrell WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2439 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lester Leaps In User:Edison 19:03, 26 August 2011 (UTC) delete """Fails otability and |verifiability as a compilation album. First: Verifiability problems: Amazon lists two CD compilations of Lester Young's recording with this title, but they have different tunes on them. There may well be a CD compilation with this title and these tunes, but there is no reference to prove it, and not even a mention of the record company or record number. Second: Notability issues: There is no information provided, nor could I find evidence, that this particular compilation was a notable one, with reviews , critical commentary, high sales, or placing in jazz recording charts. That said, the individual tune named """"Lester leaps in"""" could very easily be shown to be a notable http://www.google.com/search?q=%22lester+leaps+in%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#q=%22lester+leaps+in%22&hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&hs=Ihh&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&prmd=ivns&ei=iOlXTsn5O42CsgKKr7jDDA&start=10&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=b62454da27284b07&biw=1272&bih=853 jazz classic, popular in Young's own 1939 jazz instrumental """"Lester Leaps In, http://books.google.com/books?id=oPPMbb0cGuYC&pg=PA170&dq=%22lester+leaps+in%22&hl=en&ei=OuxXTo2nFoivsAK66_iJDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=10&ved=0CFIQ6AEwCTgK#v=onepage&q=%22lester%20leaps%20in%22&f=false widely http://books.google.com/books?id=Zc4Lh9KC2MIC&pg=PA558&dq=%22lester+leaps+in%22&hl=en&ei=OuxXTo2nFoivsAK66_iJDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CEQQ6AEwBjgK#v=onepage&q=%22lester%20leaps%20in%22&f=false discussed in http://books.google.com/books?id=pJvzEzjahkQC&pg=PA133&dq=%22lester+leaps+in%22&hl=en&ei=J-1XTti_CZOssALhnrmyDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCkQ6AEwADgU#v=onepage&q=%22lester%20leaps%20in%22&f=false books about http://books.google.com/books?id=AFlK4gzldw4C&pg=PA202&dq=%22lester+leaps+in%22&hl=en&ei=J-1XTti_CZOssALhnrmyDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CC4Q6AEwATgU#v=onepage&q=%22lester%20leaps%20in%22&f=false jazz, http://books.google.com/books?id=Zfn0lH_ZnGsC&pg=PA74&dq=%22lester+leaps+in%22&hl=en&ei=vO1XTsPCBMPjsQLYxPCeDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CDUQ6AEwAzge#v=onepage&q=%22lester%20leaps%20in%22&f=false and widely played by notable jazz bands and musicians, and http://books.google.com/books?id=fqGe7Sv71qgC&pg=PT12&dq=%22lester+leaps+in%22&hl=en&ei=SetXTr6XMM-msALt8PSsDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CEQQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=%22lester%20leaps%20in%22&f=false discussed in books about jazz standard tunes. The tune :Lester leaps in"""" is ranked http://www.jazzstandards.com/compositions-2/lesterleapsin.htm 219 in the top 1000 jazz standards at Jazzstandards.com. So it would be appropriate for someone to create a new article about the tune """"Lester leaps in,"""" and if they do there should be no suggestion they were """"recreating a deleted article""" Deletion of Lester Leaps In WP:N||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2440 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Kelly (ecologist) User:Dpbsmith 01:32, 9 February 2006 (UTC) delete per nom and per |verifiability policy mentioned under every edit box. Can be re-created at any time '''if''' proper source citations, as described in and are provided that correspond to the key facts mentioned in the article Deletion of Paul Kelly (ecologist) WP:V||WP:V||WP:CITE Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2441 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. Paul Minieri User:David 20:30, 15 July 2013 (UTC) keep I think the Ritter reaction and the tetracycline synthesis patent issue are together enough to pass #C1 and avoid falling into . But, an encyclopedia article here can only contain material coming from reliable sources, and I completely agree with the nominator's demolition of the sources as nominated. I am unable to find sources for most of the personal detail in the article as nominated, but have stubbed it back to a short article that reports only on the two things I can source: the Ritter reaction and tetracycline. It may be necessary to keep this article as a perma-stub, but I think it's ok in that state. However, I would prefer deletion over reversion to its expanded and badly sourced version Deletion of P. Paul Minieri WP:PROF||WP:BIO1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2442 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megaputer Intelligence User:Bearian 18:04, 3 February 2020 (UTC) delete per . The sources in the stub right now are tied to the company or are PR Deletion of Megaputer Intelligence WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2443 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Jedi Purge (4th nomination) User:Colonel 08:27, 29 September 2013 (UTC) keep The topic is documented in sources such as '' Star Wars: A Movie Embedded In American Culture''; ''Jedi vs. Sith: The Essential Guide to the Force''; ''Star Wars and History''. If the nominator wants the article improved he should go at it per {{tl|sofixit}}. AFDs are not the way because |AFD is not cleanup Deletion of Great Jedi Purge (4th nomination) WP:NOTCLEANUP Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +2444 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PRA Health Sciences User:timtempleton 19:04, 3 April 2018 (UTC) keep public, $2B company, with >15,000 employees. I added a few sources. Passes Deletion of PRA Health Sciences WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2445 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paracoccidioidomicosisproctitissarcomucosis (2nd nomination) User:Lankiveil 01:58, 23 March 2008 (UTC) delete while the band name is certainly amusing, they don't appear to meet . Many of the arguments from the previous AfD discussion still seem to apply here Deletion of Paracoccidioidomicosisproctitissarcomucosis (2nd nomination) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2446 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajesh Bhatt User:Utcursch 01:53, 2 March 2016 (UTC) delete Unable to find any non-trivial coverage in |third-party reliable sources. Most of the sources cited in the article are spam-ish blogs. Among the rest, a couple make a passing mention of the subject. http://www.rediff.com/movies/report/cannes/20040427.htm does't even mention him Deletion of Rajesh Bhatt WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2447 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apple Oxidation User:Doc 17:51, 13 March 2008 (UTC) delete WP:OR|original research, seems to be a #PUBLISHER|personal essay or a school project Deletion of Apple Oxidation WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2448 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teresa DeChant User:E 16:42, 23 October 2018 (UTC) delete mere for a non-notable interior designer Deletion of Teresa DeChant WP:PROMO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2449 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prequalified User:JChap2007 20:40, 20 August 2006 (UTC) delete Opinion dressed up as a dicdef. No |reliable sources are provided. Articles need to contain information; if you want to do an article that contains/is about ranting, go Dennis Miller|here Deletion of Prequalified WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2450 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free market fascism User:JayJasper 06:20, 15 August 2012 (UTC) delete Unencyclopedic essay. Clearly fails and runs afoul of , , & Deletion of Free market fascism WP:GNG||WP:NOR||WP:NPOV||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2451 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Chinese memes war on Facebook User:Power 02:00, 9 July 2017 (UTC) delete per . Egregiously promotional in nature as-written, and likely not notable as a stand-alone event Deletion of 2016 Chinese memes war on Facebook WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +2452 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cut Up User:Michig 17:07, 7 January 2018 (UTC) comment I know isn't really your thing, but would you care to explain why you are ignoring the potential pass of via those two albums, and my comment when deproding suggest a potential merge to :Vomitory (band Deletion of Cut Up WP:ATD||:WP:NBAND Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +2453 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nora O'Murchú User:David 23:05, 6 April 2015 (UTC) delete WP:TOOSOON. Her https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=NkE8p7IAAAAJ Google scholar profile shows a grand total of three citations to her work, far below #C1, and what else is there Deletion of Nora O'Murchú WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2454 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janne Grimholt User:Papaursa 17:30, 22 July 2018 (UTC) delete Sources consist of links to pages of individual statistics and two articles mentioning her moving from her team in Norway to one in Spain. Hard to say that constitutes sufficient coverage to meet . As for , the basic criteria for any sport is playing at the highest level. Since she has never competed at a world championship or Olympics, this standard is not met. In fact, she has never played for the Norwegian national adult women's team and success as a junior is usually not considered sufficient for notability Deletion of Janne Grimholt WP:GNG||WP:NSPORT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2455 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad Karma (EP) User:Articuno 12:38, 22 April 2021 (UTC) keep Current status meets as per above Deletion of Bad Karma (EP) WP:NALBUM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2456 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innovation and its Discontents User:JD554 13:35, 4 March 2008 (UTC) keep I've added a couple of references which show that the book meets criteria #1 of Deletion of Innovation and its Discontents WP:BK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2457 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Dale (New York politician) User:Lightburst 21:46, 12 August 2019 (UTC) keep non notable politician who fails NPOL yet passes . Subject became notable by being disbarred in 2005 for malfeasance, and a felony arrest and conviction 2012 for practicing as a disbarred lawyer, and denial of appeal in 2016. I added several sources including New York State Court of appeals and Buffalo news Deletion of David Dale (New York politician) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2458 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clara Lin User:Sam 18:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC) delete zh:林彦伊 never existed, and that may be an indication that she's not notable although |it isn't necessarily. I did some searching on '''{{mono|林彦伊}}''' but from the little I can understand of the Google translation, there's not much coverage found. From all I can tell, she fails /, the prize she won does not make her likely notable per , and the article should be deleted per . I am very willing to change my position, if someone fluent in Chinese can find a handful of good sources Deletion of Clara Lin WP:OTHERLANGS||WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:ANYBIO||WP:DEL8 Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +2459 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennie Wood User:Lear 04:18, 14 March 2011 (UTC) delete No indication on Google or in the article that the subject meets the |general, |biographical or |author notability guidelines.  Deletion of Jennie Wood WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:author Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2460 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Aetherverse User:Gongshow 03:55, 22 September 2017 (UTC) delete I am unable to find coverage to show that this book meets or Deletion of The Aetherverse WP:GNG||WP:BKCRIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2461 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Maloney User:HumbleGod 19:50, 15 July 2006 (UTC) delete as non-notable bureaucrat failing Deletion of Roger Maloney WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2462 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nurarihyon no Mago User:Collectonian 05:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC) delete fails and . Unnotable manga series with no significant coverage in reliable sources. Article is pure plot. Also delete List of Nurarihyon No Mago chapters with it, which appears to have been an unnecessary split with no sources Deletion of Nurarihyon no Mago WP:BK||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2463 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clifford Brown (scrutineer) User:Cbs527 21:33, 30 November 2016 (UTC) delete Seems to fail otability. Has not has received significant coverage in reliable sources. Subject is already mentioned in Eurovision Song Contest article Deletion of Clifford Brown (scrutineer) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2464 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr.Mohammad Reza Marvi Mohajer User:Edison 20:52, 6 June 2010 (UTC) delete I formatted the article a bit to make more easily readable. It is a nice resume, but so far does not quite appear to satisfy Deletion of Dr.Mohammad Reza Marvi Mohajer WP:ACADEMIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2465 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Dunlop (politician) User:The 09:22, 30 June 2018 (UTC) delete per nomination. Subject could, of course, have been independably notable himself, but all we have in |sources is that he's the chair of a party that won 0.3% of the vote in the 2017 general election. I wonder who the table is Deletion of Alan Dunlop (politician) WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2466 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Čelopek, Zvornik User:Wikimandia 05:06, 15 December 2015 (UTC) keep per . Other articles are better fleshed out ie :fr:Čelopek (Zvornik). Nom should have followed and checked interlanguage links Deletion of Čelopek, Zvornik WP:GEOLAND||WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2467 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosalind Franklin, author User:LaughingVulcan 02:39, 12 June 2007 (UTC) comment The article has been online for exactly four days, and has requested references or sources for four days. Not saying it should be deleted or kept, but do think that articles should be given a leetle more time with a unreferenced template to allow the digging up of sources first. Will it fail on and grounds? Possibly, and I share the concerns when there are so few verified sources. But maybe her or others will polish it while it's in AfD Deletion of Rosalind Franklin, author WP:N||WP:RS||WP:COI Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2468 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calvins Masawa User:GiantSnowman 20:16, 17 January 2020 (UTC) delete fails (lack of significant coverage - needs to be more than routine/trivial pieces about injuries and transfers etc.) and (has not played in a |fully-professional league or for the national team Deletion of Calvins Masawa WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:FPL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2469 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/INTP Central User:Alias 03:05, 8 July 2006 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of INTP Central WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2470 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obama Administration Miranda-warning proposal User:Ultraexactzz 18:18, 11 May 2011 (UTC) delete per , strange though that may be for a legal article. If this becomes a cogent policy proposal, an article would absolutely be appropriate -but we're not there yet. Anything about this proposal that doesn't yet exist would be speculation at best Deletion of Obama Administration Miranda-warning proposal WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2471 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Conecta User:Esradekan 07:51, 19 April 2008 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of La Conecta WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2472 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sit on My Face User:Shruti14 18:19, 21 August 2007 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Sit on My Face WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2473 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Federalist Party (Brazil) User:Coredesat 04:05, 29 June 2006 (UTC) delete nothing to assert notability (), |Wikipedia is not a soapbox Deletion of Federalist Party (Brazil) WP:ORG||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2474 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sumon (Aurthohin) User:Kmzayeem 08:53, 15 April 2014 (UTC) keep per , sources - http://archive.thedailystar.net/magazine/2007/04/01/music.htm, http://www.banglamusic.com/artists/sumon/, http://www.banglanews24.com/detailsnews.php?nssl=987d824465b7718c4aa3cc8a9e8530db&nttl=71077 Deletion of Sumon (Aurthohin) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2475 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rush in popular culture 2 User:Deckiller 23:58, 9 February 2007 (UTC) delete mdash; list of trivia trying to show that Rush is common in popular culture. It's plauged by and reliance on ''one fan site'' for reference. The mention that Rush has been influenced in popular culture on the main page is fine, becuase virtually ''all this information comes from that one site, which is already linked to and mentioned in the main article''. Redirect is unnecessary, because nothing is merged and most of the edit history we'd be preserving is edit warring and info thrown out. Besides, to quote the usuals: indiscriminate collection of information, violates the various offshoots of the Manual of Style, which state (on based on a larger consensus than a group of editors on the Rush talkpage), that articles that are lists of trivia or isolated facts are to be avoided. And like I said, they're all from one source, which fails to begin with. Once again, '''Delete'''.&mdash Deletion of Rush in popular culture 2 WP:OR||WP:NOT||WP:AVTRIV||WP:RS Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2476 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pokémon references or spoofs (2nd AfD Nomination) User:Zappernapper 16:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC) keep """While i agree with Krimpet's arguement that this is one of those lists that makes people want to crusade against ''all'' pop culture lists, both RobJ1981 and Jerichi need to remember that just calling something |cruft is not an argument in itself and should be avoided at AFDs. First, the keep: Any subject that has become so well known that it is criticized, parodied, and referenced in a wide variety of media outlets deserves a section that appropriately details some of the more high-profile or notable cases (e.g. given ''South Park's'' ratings, the """"Chinpokomon"""" episode would be high-profile). I could make a |point and go over to Wikipedia in popular culture and delete the two rather lengthy lists found there. While there may be consensus for deleting the Wikipedia in popular culture#Miscellaneous|Miscellaneous section, I doubt I would get away with rming the first one which are """"Landmark references."""" I'm not trying to make a """"two wrongs make a right"""" arguement, i just want to show how editors tend to say, """"Well it's Pokemon, and so if it's not highly important or ref-bloated we should get rid of it."""" The result is """"cruft, cruft, cruft."""" How to improve: If you take a close look at Otto4711's arguements you can see that this list ''could'' be improved if anyone wanted to take the time to provide the importance of said pop culture references - the Wikpedia related article justifies many of it's inclusions because they are the first examples within a specific media (of course 3 of them could be rm for not fulfilling this criterion), this list could follow suit with many of the entries""" Deletion of List of Pokémon references or spoofs (2nd AfD Nomination) WP:CRUFT||WP:POINT Wikipedia:Fancruft 61 +2477 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Davis (footballer) User:GiantSnowman 17:19, 18 April 2018 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Ben Davis (footballer) WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2478 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultraviolet Sound User:Jo7hs2 21:32, 27 December 2008 (UTC) delete Fails notability requirements Deletion of Ultraviolet Sound WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2479 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of common phrases in various languages (second nomination) User:Ohconfucius 02:48, 1 September 2006 (UTC) delete """It is a scope problem and has to go. """"Wikipedia articles are not... a usage guide or slang and idiom guide"""". Whilst I find it potentially useful, this article is very clearly outside the scope of wiki per . I am very tickled by the inclusion of Scottish, which I think is omplete bollocks|complete bollocks, as it is the transliteration of what a particular regional Scottish accent. Wiki is also an indiscriminate collection of information. Aside from the main recognised languages, dialects and regional accents abound. Editors have obvious difficulty drawing the line at pidgin english, or pidgin French. We have included the main Chinese dialects, but there are tens of others. Now what about Brummie, Scouse or Geordie accents, for example""" Deletion of List of common phrases in various languages (second nomination) WP:NOT||WP:C||WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2480 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Francis User:Tedder 03:01, 29 June 2010 (UTC) delete No |reliable sources establishing notability. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&tbs=nws%3A1&q=%22matt+francis%22&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai= Google News didn't show anything. Madameovary, if he's incredibly influential in Oregon, why http://search.oregonlive.com/matt+francis hasn't The Oregonian written about him, and if he's been in film festivals, why aren't there |reliable sources showing they have been there, and (hopefully) have won awards? In other words, has not been met Deletion of Matt Francis WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2481 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let the bodies pile high User:FollowTheTortoise 17:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC) comment """I might be missing something, but I believe that the remark passes . The barrier is actually lower than some of the comments above might seem to suggest for '''significant coverage''': """"""""significant coverage"""" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material."""" Pretty much every UK news source has written at least one article about it (for example, BBC News has https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56914432 this article, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 this article, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-politics-56915152 this shorter article, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-politics-56914397 this shorter article and https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56897213 this article which is at least one third focused on the comment and as can be seen by https://www.bbc.co.uk/search?q=%22bodies+pile+high%22&page=1 this search result, the comment has not been limited to that selection of articles in the BBC's coverage) and so it is clear that it passes that precondition; while no book has been written about the comment, it's plainly not just a trivial footnote like the Bill Clinton example in . It's also worth noting that notability is not temporary, as per . Additionally, its overwhelming coverage combined with Peston's article cited above also make it clear to me that the remark is '''reliable''', '''independent of the subject''' and, finally, that there are multiple secondary '''sources'''. Whether the remark warrants its own page is something that I'm still not sure about, but I wanted to put forward the argument that it does pass """ Deletion of Let the bodies pile high WP:GNG||WP:NOTTEMPORARY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2482 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Letele User:Mdtemp 15:32, 21 October 2015 (UTC) delete Only routine sports coverage and fails to meet Deletion of David Letele WP:NBOX Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2483 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew D. Gordon User:Agricola44 16:28, 3 February 2012 (UTC) keep To add the WoS perspective to David's stats: 44 papers with citation counts 332, 272, 214...conclusively passes #1 Deletion of Andrew D. Gordon WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2484 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naim (chat program) User:Joe 20:55, 30 September 2009 (UTC) delete I can't find |significant coverage for this software Deletion of Naim (chat program) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2485 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japanese American Evacuation of 1942 User:SarekOfVulcan 20:34, 18 July 2006 (UTC) delete per as nominated Deletion of Japanese American Evacuation of 1942 WP:POVFORK Wikipedia:Content forking 33 +2486 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Shuvat Rachel shooting User:E 19:35, 24 July 2015 (UTC) keep """As per the most important of the several policies that distinguish notable events from routine news and events. reads: """"If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article."""" I point you to in-depth articles on this terror murder in linked in the article. I remind editors raising that WP is and , and that is not a policy based argument. An event with this breadth and depth of coverage does not have to demonstrate ongoing impact to be WP notable. Under an event has to meet , which this event objectively does. Nevertheless, this shooting has had demonstrable impact (in article since the creation) on the Israeli conversation about whether to agree to a prisoner exchange that Hamas is requesting this summer (for the bodies of soldiers, or for the return of a mentally ill Israelis who crossed the border into Gaza). It is argued that since this was one of 6 recent terror murders carried out by convicted terrorists released in the Gilad Shalit prisoner exchange, a fresh exchange endangers the lives of Israelis and is, therefore, bad policy. Independent of that, it is making waves in diplomatic relations between Turkey and Israel (because Saleh al-Arouri) and between Israel and Jordan (because the operative directly in charge of this Hamas terror cell resides in Jordan""" Deletion of 2015 Shuvat Rachel shooting WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTCENSORED||WP:BATTLEGROUND||WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT||WP:EVENTCRIT||WP:INDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2487 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arun Kumar Pallathadka (2nd nomination) User:Redtigerxyz 10:46, 2 September 2012 (UTC) delete """fails (""""Significant coverage"""") and """ Deletion of Arun Kumar Pallathadka (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2488 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Ferry User:Bearian 16:30, 12 August 2019 (UTC) keep the bestselling book checks out. I'm not sure if that's |enough coverage Deletion of Tom Ferry WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2489 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of online trading platforms User:Dr 21:35, 22 July 2021 (UTC) keep per . Ping me if you want me to give more detail about why nom is wrong here.— Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Deletion of Comparison of online trading platforms WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +2490 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two Coats of Paint [[User talk:209.30.16.190|talk]]) 17:09, 19 January 2009 (UTC) delete Clearly fails . Not notable. Special:Contributions/209.30.16.190|209.30.16.190 Deletion of Two Coats of Paint WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2491 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Frangou User:Binksternet 12:58, 6 July 2015 (UTC) delete This article has been deleted five times as Chris Frangou. See the previous discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Frangou. Fails Deletion of Christopher Frangou WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2492 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diego Bartolotta User:Hypogaearoots 16:37, 9 May 2021 (UTC) delete non-notable footballer fails Deletion of Diego Bartolotta WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2493 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superluminal graviton User:Cosmic 09:54, 11 July 2008 (UTC) delete """per . We already have a Superluminal article. As an aside, the ''seven'' Google hits (apart from the WP article, and including at least one blog, which references Superluminal anyway!) for """"superluminal graviton"""" do not exactly look promising""" Deletion of Superluminal graviton WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2494 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powers and abilities of Sabretooth and Wolverine (detailed) User:Anetode 14:49, 25 October 2005 (UTC) delete This edit war seems like an issue for rbCom Deletion of Powers and abilities of Sabretooth and Wolverine (detailed) WP:A Wikipedia:Attribution 34 +2495 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Schoyen User:RoySmith 20:30, 29 September 2018 (UTC) delete Promotional puff-piece created by a . Amazing it lasted this long Deletion of Christian Schoyen WP:SPA Wikipedia:Single-purpose account 21 +2496 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cory Wade Hindorff User:Melia97 21:32, 23 November 2016 (UTC) delete Has not gained any sort of significant notability after losing a reality TV show. Fails Deletion of Cory Wade Hindorff WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2497 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandra Huynh User:SportingFlyer 04:37, 16 June 2018 (UTC) delete it does fail (see my argument at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nicole_Simonsen) and more importantly for women's soccer Deletion of Alexandra Huynh WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2498 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elephants Are Not Birds User:Isabelle 20:41, 5 August 2021 (UTC) delete Having an ISBN doesn't mean it's notable. The article in its current state reads as an advertisement. I wouldn't say it meets , as it's only being covered by a few and only for the fact it's not being sold on the Amazon store due to its transphobic content because it's chosen not to sell via Amazon and due to its anti-trans content Deletion of Elephants Are Not Birds WP:NBOOK||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2499 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Honours School System, Lahore (2nd nomination) User:4meter4 02:48, 25 October 2019 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Honours School System, Lahore (2nd nomination) WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2500 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vakhtang Kvaratskelia User:GiantSnowman 10:36, 31 January 2013 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Vakhtang Kvaratskelia WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2501 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lela London User:StephenBuxton 00:05, 31 October 2010 (UTC) delete Cannot find anything beyond the one event. http://www.graziadaily.co.uk/fashion/archive/2010/10/26/harry-potter-bride-marries-in-knock-off-alexander-mcqueen.htm Grazia has picked up the story, by repeating her findings, but other than that I can't see anything to warrant an article about Ms London. If there are some reliable sources found about this event (other than those that just repeat her blog), then by all means it should be added to the film article (as per ).''(edit - just realised that I didn't add my sig. Whoops Deletion of Lela London WP:ONEEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2502 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Western School of Health and Business Careers - Monroeville User:Noroton 04:44, 25 January 2008 (UTC) delete unless someone can demonstrate notability as per or . This is a for-profit company, and while I disagree with the sometimes wild lengths that some editors go to in avoiding mentions of for-profit companies, we do sometimes need to hold them to a strict standard. The reasons for that are (a) they've got a bit less accountability to the public and are therefore more likely to lie in their self-published materials, including their Web site, and (b) I think there's slightly more chance that someone working for the place could present the company in a distorted way. For the good of Wikipedia, we don't want to be an advertising vehicle. I did a cursory look at G-hits and Google Archive hits and didn't find good sources. Also, there's an article for this campus, but not for the school as a whole (the other campus is in Pittsburgh) and it seems to me that a single article encompassing the entire school would be more appropriate. By the way, the dean of education for this school http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/cityregion/s_451104.html plead guilty to charges that he lied to the federal government. That doesn't mean the school is lieing all over the place, but it isn't reassuring Deletion of Western School of Health and Business Careers - Monroeville WP:N||WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2503 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksandra Dranka User:Dirtlawyer1 20:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC) merge Based on current article, I can see no particular grounds for here. Inclusion in existing list should suffice. Support arguments made by Deletion of Aleksandra Dranka WP:NOTABLE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2504 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frances Griffiths User:Sjakkalle 07:47, 18 May 2006 (UTC) delete It is a G2 testpage. No need to bring this stuff to AFD, just let the speedy tag stay until someone deletes it or makes something resembling an article Deletion of Frances Griffiths WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +2505 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stay (SafetySuit song) User:Rlendog 20:23, 28 July 2009 (UTC) keep As noted in the nominator's change of heart, both these songs did chart and thus do meet .http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&searchlink=SAFETYSUIT&sql=11:azfrxzt5ldse~T51 Billboard may be having a problem with its newly redesigned site right now Deletion of Stay (SafetySuit song) WP:NSONGS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2506 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Ward (2nd nomination) NONE NONE keep per meeting and | #1. WP:MUSICBIO instructions are that at least one of the listed criteria be met.. and #1 is. It does not require that more than one, or that all of the great list shared by the nominator, need be. We also do not expect a singer who meets GNG and MUSICBIO also ''has'' meet the criteria set for |actors. I never heard of Tyler Ward before tyoday, and whether or not the nominator actually reseached his deletion nomination, a very |quick look finds international coverage for both his current music career and even his past sports career Deletion of Tyler Ward (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:MUSBIO||WP:ENT||WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2507 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaundon User:Victor 14:39, 13 April 2008 (UTC) delete per . Artist must have released ''two'' albuns through a major label to become notable Deletion of Chaundon WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2508 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atop the Fourth Wall: The Movie User:MichaelQSchmidt 09:28, 11 May 2015 (UTC) delete for now as simply being |TOO SOON and failing . It mmight nerit a mention over at the Lewis Lovhaug article, but not a separate article. allow undeletion or recreation once filming begins and if it gets the requisite media coverage Deletion of Atop the Fourth Wall: The Movie WP:NYF||WP:NFF Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +2509 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bay Valley Foods User:Youngamerican 01:30, 20 August 2007 (UTC) delete per general guidelines of Deletion of Bay Valley Foods WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2510 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sleepy's User:Bearian 01:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC) keep possibly one of the two or three |best known bedding stores in the United States, with hundreds of locations Deletion of Sleepy's WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2511 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ANC Today NONE NONE keep The publication ANC Today does meet and ournals, there are many independent and verifiable references that quote ANC Today Deletion of ANC Today WP:WEB||WP:NJ Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2512 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moros Eros User:Chubbles 19:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC) keep two albums on Victory Records passes . A little digging would turn up scads of album reviews, an Allmusic profile, and plenty of touring Deletion of Moros Eros WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2513 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markus Fjørtoft User:Leeds 13:19, 9 July 2018 (UTC) keep """Admittedly fails but passes . Page creator has provided more sources, and I and other members of the football community have been aware of this young man's name for years independent of any Sounders association. The only reason he hasn't started professionally is because of MLS international roster slot rules, which while I understand is irrelevant to is something that should be mentioned. It would be unfortunate to browse the pages that link to him and not be able to access more information, and as a user above states, he's a """"possible search term."""" Again, coverage looks to be more than passing mentions to me. Cheers""" Deletion of Markus Fjørtoft WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2514 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wardheernews Somalia User:JohnmgKing 20:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC) delete article looks promotional or simply created because . Some coverage can be found but not sufficiently reliable sources Deletion of Wardheernews Somalia WP:ITEXISTS Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +2515 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manuel Rivera Jr. User:The 18:10, 11 January 2021 (UTC) merge to List of Puerto Rican military personnel, where he is mentioned. His service is appreciated, but |Wikipedia is not a memorial, and I don't see , , or being met here Deletion of Manuel Rivera Jr. WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:GNG||WP:NPERSON||WP:SOLDIER Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2516 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albi the Squirrel User:Chris 16:48, 28 October 2010 (UTC) delete A lot more coverage than your average squirrel, but not enough to overcome Deletion of Albi the Squirrel WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2517 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cold War II User:Hawkeye7 20:33, 5 November 2015 (UTC) keep Agree with {{u|Artw}} that the title is a terrible , and may well be renamed in due course, but that does not alter the fact that passes . It could be considered a subarticle of Foreign policy of Vladimir Putin but that article is bursting at the seams and has already quite rightly spawned a number of subarticles. Not a , so no grounds for deletion Deletion of Cold War II WP:NEO||WP:GNG||WP:POVFORK Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +2518 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashli Babbitt User:Muboshgu 17:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC) delete as meeting the criteria of that says not to give her an article. –  Deletion of Ashli Babbitt WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +2519 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multitorrent User:Gary 07:10, 8 March 2008 (UTC) delete This is completely non-notable, per . Cannot find any notable mention of the website anywhere besides the fact that torrent sites typically result in a lot of search results Deletion of Multitorrent WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2520 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alisa Krylova User:SamHolt6 13:54, 19 July 2017 (UTC) keep Needs improvement and more verification, but the subject appears to meet criteria Deletion of Alisa Krylova WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2521 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John J. Flood User:Bearian 20:51, 23 July 2020 (UTC) delete It may be 100% true, but if he's not |covered significantly in reliable sources, he's not |notable as we define it. Zero news articles on Google, passing mentions in a book, few citations to his work (if it's the same person Deletion of John J. Flood WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2522 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristin Fairlie User:SL93 01:30, 22 March 2017 (UTC) keep Per . She has had several significant roles in notable television shows and movies. Her significant roles, such as in Little Bear, can easily be found by just searching. A couple of seconds alone verified https://books.google.com/books?id=1N4Okbxfz5YC&pg=PA147&dq=%22Kristin+Fairlie%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi32Y6t-ujSAhUH12MKHcpbDZ0Q6AEIMDAE#v=onepage&q=%22Kristin%20Fairlie%22&f=false her role as Little Bear Deletion of Kristin Fairlie WP:ENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2523 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabian Benko User:Hallward 21:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC) delete In my view, this fails fairly easily. I am particularly persuaded by the responses of Fenix and Ravenswing to Görlitz's claims to the contrary Deletion of Fabian Benko WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2524 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satyodaya Centre [[User talk:96.127.243.251|talk]]) 04:28, 11 August 2018 (UTC) delete half of sources are from the org itself. As demonstrated in the discussion above, the article creator does not understand or , thus, this article on another non-notable org.Special:Contributions/96.127.243.251|96.127.243.251 Deletion of Satyodaya Centre WP:ORG||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2525 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Nichols User:David 17:08, 12 March 2014 (UTC) delete for lack of independent, reliable (and mainstream) sources that cover the subject in-depth. No evidence of passing Deletion of Andrew Nichols WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2526 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geneva Manifesto User:Kusma 01:17, 21 November 2015 (UTC) keep or '''merge to Infante Juan, Count of Barcelona'''. The nominator deserves a for assuming that references linking back into an article are evidence of a hoax - particularly when the links go to an entry in the article's Bibliography section which gives full bibliographical details of the referenced work, complete with a working ISBN link. As Deletion of Geneva Manifesto WP:TROUT Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout 68 +2527 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Herzberg NONE NONE delete Classic example of which excludes this type of article. Additionally, fails , and . Article and references do not establish anything notable about the subject - plenty of lawyers earn over $1 mil. a year, plenty of people own cannabis dispensaries, plenty of people are partners at non-notable companies. No amount of sourcing or editing is going to make the subject notable Deletion of Aaron Herzberg WP:NOT||WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:BIO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2528 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Health Shield User:Drchriswilliams 21:09, 1 July 2016 (UTC) delete The article seems entirely promotional. Like the other editors that have commented here, I searched but couldn't find any coverage in reliable sources. Notability has not been established, when judged according to or Deletion of Health Shield WP:COMPANY||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2529 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LAGbook User:GabrielF 19:59, 1 July 2013 (UTC) delete this article has a long history of problems. Lagbook was deleted twice in February 2012 as unambiguous advertising. The article was recreated as LAGbook and had significant issues with sourcing. Particularly troubling was the company's tendency to make claims that were reprinted in the Nigerian media but were either grossly inflated or taken out of context or untrue. My favorite examples: the company claimed to have partnered with Dropbox when, if you read what they were claiming to have done carefully, it sounded like they had just plunked down $100 on Dropbox for Teams and called that a partnership. Similarly, the article claimed that Lagbook had been covered by TechCrunch, but when you read the TechCrunch article it was about a completely different company, GROUPS.PS, which makes a white-label social networking service and only briefly mentioned Lagbook as one of the users of that service. There were other s, at the time I first CSD'd Lagbook, the company's logo was identical to Facebook's except that it was green instead of blue and used a lowercase l instead of a lowercase f. So I was not at all surprised when the creators of Lagbook put the website for sale and then the purchaser of Lagbook came forward and said that the founders were making false claims about the business and hijacking the purchaser's social media accounts. You can read the details at Talk:LAGbook. The sources that we have are primarily Nigerian media (The Vanguard and the National Mirror). Given that these sources have printed inaccurate claims from the Lagbook founders without doing any kind of independent research, I think they need to be discounted as unreliable. What that leaves us with is a website that sold for $10,000https://flippa.com/2867569-pr-4-social-network-with-750k-registered-members-124k-uniques-mo-making-693-mo, ranked around 18,000 on Alexa at its best and is now defunct. I don't see any notability here but I am worried that the founders are using Wikipedia as a vehicle for dishonest self-promotion Deletion of LAGbook WP:REDFLAG Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2530 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justice 4 All Women & Children User:Piotrus 06:18, 12 November 2020 (UTC) delete Fails NORG/GNG. Is this even a real organization? I can't locate a website outside a blog on wordpress. No mentions in the news. Seems like it is just a Facebook group or something similar. etc Deletion of Justice 4 All Women & Children WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2531 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FK Budućnost Arilje User:Fenix 09:04, 21 July 2017 (UTC) delete fails , no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication of any other achievements garnering sufficient significant, independent coverage to satisfy GNG Deletion of FK Budućnost Arilje WP:FOOTYN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2532 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Confession (band) User:Schuym1 00:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Confession (band) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2533 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheitaan User:Donaldd23 18:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Sheitaan WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2534 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drogbaism User:Richmeister 06:58, 29 August 2007 (UTC) delete per PC78 below - #G10 Deletion of Drogbaism WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +2535 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gravediggers User:Gavin 09:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC) delete as they are not |notable characters. Compare and contrast with Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead|Rosencrantz & Guildenstern whose notability is derived from adaptations outside of the play's context. I have already merged the text with Gravedigger#Gravediggers in literature|Gravediggers in literature, where I think the content of this stub should be laid to rest Deletion of The Gravediggers WP:FICTION Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2536 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locations in Hogwarts User:Gavin 11:08, 30 October 2007 (UTC) delete as nominated. Lack of |reliable seconary sources suggests these fictional locations have no |notability outside of their fictional setting Deletion of Locations in Hogwarts WP:RS||WP:FICTION Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2537 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC Fight Night 12 (2nd nomination) user:east718 NONE keep Unlike last time, there is |verifiable information about a confirmed date and matchup from a |reliable source (Dann Stupp is an expert in the field, and a sportswriter for Yahoo! Sports, the Dayton Daily News, MLB.com, and the San Francisco Chronicle). doesn't apply anymore since the event is notable and guaranteed to take place Deletion of UFC Fight Night 12 (2nd nomination) WP:V||WP:RS||WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2538 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Watton User:Qrsdogg 21:38, 24 May 2011 (UTC) delete Looks to me like he fails Deletion of Gary Watton WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2539 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Tench User:Isotope23 14:57, 12 July 2006 (UTC) delete per a crystal ball. Recreation if/when this show actaully airs is perfectly acceptible Deletion of David Tench WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2540 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monstercat 003 – Momentum User:UserDude 07:42, 24 March 2020 (UTC) delete per nom. Could not find any sources supporting Deletion of Monstercat 003 – Momentum WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2541 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Alouise User:SamHolt6 17:51, 19 September 2017 (UTC) delete Fails , porbably only exists due to paid editing by suspected paid editor (Undisclosed paid editing tag per Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Jabailey1 Deletion of Diana Alouise WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2542 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debbie Dorsey User:Location 23:01, 25 August 2009 (UTC) delete Fails . Doesn't really even meet Deletion of Debbie Dorsey WP:GNG||WP:ONEEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2543 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingdom of the Slavs NONE NONE keep per . As Usernameunique says, it's easy to find high-quality sources writing about Orbini and ''Kingdom of the Slavs''. For example Deletion of Kingdom of the Slavs WP:NEXIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2544 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manual (musician) User:Sparklism 08:59, 20 May 2019 (UTC) keep Meets through the coverage shown by Michig above Deletion of Manual (musician) WP:NMUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2545 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Century Record Manufacturing Company User:Walter 21:35, 3 May 2017 (UTC) keep The source, while not all online, seem to help the subject meet at least if not . Thanks to Eurodog for finding them and improving the article Deletion of Century Record Manufacturing Company :WP:COMPANY||:WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2546 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moonshine Throwdown User:Ejgreen77 04:45, 24 June 2020 (UTC) delete """Another article about a very recently established CFB """"rivalry"""" game (though there were a couple earlier meetings, the article itself states that ''""""the rivalry was established in 2014""""''), so it's probably in that regard. The only source to call this a rivalry is a non-RS blog site. If this article is kept for some reason, it should definitely be moved to a different title. Fails """ Deletion of Moonshine Throwdown WP:TOOSOON||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +2547 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grenfell Tower (2nd nomination) User:Thincat 22:04, 5 June 2018 (UTC) keep """It may well not have been a notable building before the fire but since the fire there has been a mass of reporting about the building as it was before the fire. We do not ask ''why'' there is coverage (of the pre-fire building) we simply ask that there ''is'' such coverage. Even if the analogy with people is appropriate using , """"If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate"""" rather strongly advises we should have both articles""" Deletion of Grenfell Tower (2nd nomination) WP:ONEEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2548 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TPG - Toilet Paper Gun User:Ahecht 18:42, 12 May 2014 (UTC) delete per and Deletion of TPG - Toilet Paper Gun WP:GNG||WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2549 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Bascombe (2nd nomination) User:GiantSnowman 10:17, 21 April 2013 (UTC) keep the previous nomination was withdrawn (by me!) not because he met , but because he met and consensus was clearly in agreement Deletion of Chris Bascombe (2nd nomination) WP:NAUTHOR||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2550 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campaign Against Antisemitism User:AusLondonder 07:57, 13 November 2017 (UTC) delete Fails and . Has not received significant, in-depth coverage in multiple independent reliable sources Deletion of Campaign Against Antisemitism WP:ORGCRITE||WP:ORGDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2551 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Sugars User:Snigbrook 12:55, 13 June 2009 (UTC) keep ActionCOACH, merge Brad Sugars. The company appears to be notable, Sugars has some notability and possibly enough for , but I don't think a separate article is needed Deletion of Brad Sugars WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2552 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Underwater security User:Jamesontai 04:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC) delete as . I can see a version of this article stripped off of the , but it wouldn't be more than half a sentence remaining nor would it be notable Deletion of Underwater security WP:OR||WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2553 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Cooper (missing person) User:Esquivalience 14:27, 21 June 2015 (UTC) delete per : only notable for the event Deletion of Elizabeth Cooper (missing person) WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +2554 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilyas Ahmed (East Pakistan cricketer) User:Lugnuts 13:54, 18 January 2021 (UTC) keep meets . Ten days ago Deletion of Ilyas Ahmed (East Pakistan cricketer) WP:NCRIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2555 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valdas Pocevičius User:Mkdw 22:13, 2 February 2013 (UTC) delete Nomination is solid against . No top tier fights, let alone 3, as described at . No significant coverage outside for his events and does not meet as the alternate policy Deletion of Valdas Pocevičius WP:NMMA||WP:MMATIER||WP:ROUTINE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2556 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bombshell (Transformers) (2nd nomination) User:Lightburst 21:59, 1 November 2019 (UTC) keep passes with Deletion of Bombshell (Transformers) (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2557 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James W. LaBelle User:David 05:46, 6 February 2018 (UTC) keep per #C5, thanks to Gnome's improvements Deletion of James W. LaBelle WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2558 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bread Givers User:Zagalejo 17:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC) keep I think every book summarized at http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/breadgivers/ Sparknotes has to pass with ease. It does need cleanup, but that's not what AFD is for Deletion of Bread Givers WP:BK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2559 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayfair High School User:Alansohn 02:15, 26 November 2006 (UTC) keep based on awards received, championships won and notable alumni, all of which are sourced in full compliance with and , the school meets and exceeds the standards set by and deserves to be retained Deletion of Mayfair High School WP:RS||WP:V||WP:SCHOOL Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2560 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lil Lody User:Magnolia677 01:53, 25 December 2016 (UTC) delete Fails , , and . I found a few interviews like http://www.memphisflyer.com/CallingtheBluff/archives/2015/03/26/throwback-thursday-lil-lody-talks-sisters-death-being-sued-by-juicy-j-and-project-pat this, but no secondary sources needed to establish notability Deletion of Lil Lody WP:BASIC||WP:ANYBIO||WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2561 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Mutton User:Barney 10:53, 23 August 2014 (UTC) keep the reason given above for deletion was essentially a barefaced lie, as anyone can comprehend that the leader of the majority party on the council is more important than any old councillor. Furthermore, the suggestion that he doesn't meet seems entirely hopeful and not based on fact; I suggest that the Internet news search required by was either not performed, performed incorrectly, or was performed and then lied about Deletion of John Mutton WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2562 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelechi Onyenachi User:Paulmcdonald 02:54, 16 December 2013 (UTC) delete clearly a promotional piece. Stats aren't even all that impressive for a high school player at his peer level. I would support a on this one per G-11 and possibly A-7 Deletion of Kelechi Onyenachi WP:SPEEDY Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +2563 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tear trough rejuvenation User:Tree 03:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC) delete as an |advertisement Deletion of Tear trough rejuvenation WP:ADS Wikipedia:Spam 26 +2564 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golden Stars International User:Joe 22:05, 14 September 2009 (UTC) delete I can't find significant coverage for this |album Deletion of Golden Stars International WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2565 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anupap Buachand User:Orangemike 17:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC) delete without prejudice - no assertion of notability, no evidence of notability, in fact no |reliable sources whatsoever on a BLP Deletion of Anupap Buachand :WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2566 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Cesca User:CNMall41 06:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC) delete Unless he goes by another name, there is absolutely no press I could locate that could remotely be used to establish notability. Fails Deletion of Ray Cesca WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2567 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Praydon Darmoo User:Ukexpat 16:37, 7 July 2011 (UTC) delete per A7 (and yes I do understand the speedy deletion criteria, thank you). Per (not an A7 after recent minor additions Deletion of Praydon Darmoo WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +2568 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Oxygen User:Ritchie333 15:19, 13 February 2013 (UTC) keep per the chart success found by Grandmartin11, which satisfies Deletion of Black Oxygen WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2569 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hal Bidlack User:JoshuaZ 22:00, 16 November 2008 (UTC) keep Appears to meet . Bidlack's notable for a variety of different things. His work promoting skepticism probably makes him notable by itself. There are many reliable sources about him Deletion of Hal Bidlack WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2570 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Carter (politician) User:Mkativerata 22:09, 12 March 2010 (UTC) delete A clear case on and no claim to |notability in general Deletion of Paul Carter (politician) WP:POLITICIAN||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2571 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of triathletes User:Bearian 17:06, 26 September 2012 (UTC) keep but please add |some citations, please, for the kittens Deletion of List of triathletes WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2572 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dungeons & Dragons halfling deities User:Rorshacma 19:26, 2 December 2019 (UTC) delete The individual gods listed here are not individually notable. Searching for sources discussing the concept of Halfling Deities as a group turns up nothing in-depth in any kind of reliable, secondary sources, thus causing the list to fail Deletion of List of Dungeons & Dragons halfling deities WP:LISTN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2573 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierre Picault User:Amalthea 11:50, 17 August 2008 (UTC) delete fails at the moment, per nomination. Even if he is officially one of the last WWI survivors and gets news coverage he might still fail due to Deletion of Pierre Picault WP:BIO||WP:ONEEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2574 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Widdershins, LLC User:AllyD 13:05, 10 March 2018 (UTC) delete It is surprising, given the discussions on the article Talk page, that it did not arrive at AfD before this. It appears to be a run-of-the-mill events business; I am seeing nothing to demonstrate notability, nor is that inherited from recent social media posts concerning a person associated with the company Deletion of Widdershins, LLC :WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2575 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fernanda Rubio User:HisSpaceResearch 13:12, 2 November 2007 (UTC) delete I must admit, that the idea of male-to-female transsexual porn stars could bring about a bias in me because , but doesn't appear to have any notability either on an objective level Deletion of Fernanda Rubio WP:IDONTLIKEIT Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +2576 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Varieties of capitalism User:Adambiswanger1 20:41, 24 July 2006 (UTC) delete I'm afraid it falls under the realm of |Original research. Thanks for your contributions, though Deletion of Varieties of capitalism WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2577 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomas Lasansky User:Northamerica1000 10:44, 13 August 2016 (UTC) keep Meets on a weak level. The subject has received in-depth, significant coverage in two sources (http://www.aspentimes.com/article/20080223/ASPENWEEKLY03/796843832 ''The Aspen Times'', http://www.southbendtribune.com/entertainment/inthebend/eventnews/lasansky-exhibit-highlights-father-s-influence/article_73e9f9a3-08c0-5af8-93ab-99d119656769.html ''South Bend Tribune''), and coverage beyond passing mentions in the University of Notre Dame's http://sniteartmuseum.nd.edu/exhibitions/past-exhibitions/2015-exhibitions/mauricio-and-tomas-lasansky-br-father-and-son/ Snite Museum of Art. For what it's worth, the subject is also mentioned at the Oxford Dictionary of American Art and Artists (https://books.google.com/books?id=VxsTDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA274&dq=%22Tomas+Lasansky%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiW7v6Sm77OAhVE2WMKHVP5Dz0Q6AEIHjAA#v=onepage&q=%22Tomas%20Lasansky%22&f=false link Deletion of Tomas Lasansky WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2578 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starving the Monkeys User:Vicenarian 22:10, 29 June 2009 (UTC) delete """You can buy lots of non-notable things on Amazon.com, being available for sale there doesn't otability (books)#Online bookstores|automatically confer notability. Note that Amazon lists the publisher as """"Starve Monkey Press (June 2, 2009)."""" Vanity press? This, and the fact that the only sources available seem to come from the author, concern me per otability (books)#Self-publication|the guidelines regarding self-publishing. The notability criteria for Wikipedia are well-defined and straight-forward, and the objections here have nothing to do with the topic of the book or content of the article. Also, we quickly and vigorously delete a LOT of non-notable content every single day""" Deletion of Starving the Monkeys WP:N||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2579 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 UPSL season User:GiantSnowman 15:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC) comment to all those !voting 'keep'; the presence of sources does not equate to notability, and neither does the existence of other similar articles (). I have yet to see a meaniningful 'keep' !vote, everything is simply coming across as Deletion of 2018 UPSL season WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:ILIKEIT Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +2580 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Astrojet User:Stifle 12:46, 3 February 2006 (UTC) delete Bouncing around the eastern seaboard might be construed as meeting the guidelines, but I'll fall back on the fact that it isn't verifiable, for now Deletion of The Astrojet WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2581 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Answerconnect User:Aboutmovies 08:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC) delete all but one of the references is a press release or blog entry, neither of which are RS and thus fails . The other ref (for customer service) no longer works and the WayBack machine has no record of it. Also, the ''Portland Business Journal'' shows zero hits for the company, and any notable company based in Portland would have at least one hit there Deletion of Answerconnect WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2582 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Market Sweep User:LightandDark2000 21:58, 24 May 2018 (UTC) keep Obviously notable. The nominator also appears to be a |single-purpose account Deletion of Operation Market Sweep WP:SPA Wikipedia:Single-purpose account 21 +2583 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beaverton, Montana User:Carlossuarez46 22:23, 6 January 2015 (UTC) keep obviously; meets , real place recognized by the US govt; being a gazetteer is one of the Wikipedia:Five pillars Deletion of Beaverton, Montana WP:GEOLAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2584 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fast Walker (second nomination) User:Wsiegmund 15:49, 12 July 2006 (UTC) delete see . Article asserts that only one satellite detected the event; consequently, no confirmation exists that it even occurred Deletion of Fast Walker (second nomination) WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2585 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truthiness (3rd nomination) User:Part 23:24, 16 April 2007 (UTC) keep I'll that Deletion of Truthiness (3rd nomination) WP:AGF Wikipedia:Assume good faith 53 +2586 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1974 Boston University Terriers football team User:Chetsford 19:02, 25 February 2018 (UTC) keep Notability is not temporary, the mere fact that the BU FB program has become defunct is not a valid deletion criteria. Article is extensively sourced to Deletion of 1974 Boston University Terriers football team WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2587 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arianna Afsar User:Lonehexagon 23:26, 28 February 2018 (UTC) keep Easily passes with significant coverage in reliable sources. The article appears to be well-referenced Deletion of Arianna Afsar WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2588 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cary Towne Center User:Crzrussian 04:03, 9 July 2006 (UTC) delete despite and in spite of and to spite prior precedent. All individual retail outlets are NN unless they either occupy notable/historic structures (e.g. The Passage) or are of '''monumental''' significance (e.g. same or Mall of America). Otherwise, they are to be listed in the articles of the corporations operating them, if such corporations meet etc Deletion of Cary Towne Center WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2589 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Sofocleous User:Twinkler4 22:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC) delete """How in the world can this article be improved? It says """"Not much information is available on Sofocleous"""", also if there was someone who could put more info on him I'm guessing it wouldn't follow , because it also says """"it is common knowledge within professional drum circles"""" there will probably be no references or citations""" Deletion of Aaron Sofocleous WP:NOR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2590 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rod Allen Drinking Game User:Bschott 17:20, 8 August 2006 (UTC) comment Sorry, 69.241.235.195, but I struck your last keep because you have already had your say. Also, Unregistered or new users are welcome to contribute to the discussion, but their recommendations may be discounted, especially if they seem to be made in bad faith (for example, if they misrepresent their reasons). Conversely, the opinions of logged in users whose accounts predate the article's AfD nomination are given more weight. (what was per the page Deletion of Rod Allen Drinking Game WP:AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +2591 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhadak (song) [[User talk:Usernamekiran|'''(talk)''']] 19:36, 22 July 2018 (UTC) delete a few mentions in independent , but most of the other coverage is from the websites that cover almost every song. Fails . —usernamekiran Deletion of Dhadak (song) WP:RS||WP:NSONG Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2592 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V N Maurya User:Voceditenore 15:55, 30 April 2012 (UTC) delete I can find no evidence of passing either |general notability guidelines or Wikipedia:Notability (academics). Note that the url for Shekhawati Engineering Institute above is for the old version of their site. Unfortunately, http://sec.secd.ac.in/ the new version doesn't list any faculty. He does appear to be on World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology Scientific Committee and Editorial Review Board on Engineering and Physical Sciences http://www.waset.org/EngineeringandPhysicalSciences.php?page=110. But memberships in such editorial review boards are standard for working academics, and this one appears to be particularly non-selective, with editorial board membership open to anyone with a PhD Deletion of V N Maurya WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2593 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nat Gertler (2nd nomination) User:GentlemanGhost 11:52, 15 March 2014 (UTC) keep Again.) Bad faith nomination by a now-blocked sockpuppet. (Again.) But ignoring the problems with the nominator, Tomwsulcer has stated above how this article meets the notability requirement. If you want want to do away with making nominees notable, then you'll need to change . And this is not the place to do that Deletion of Nat Gertler (2nd nomination) WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2594 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kit and Kay Boodle User:Alphachimp 00:54, 11 July 2006 (UTC) delete fails per yet another hilarious nom Deletion of Kit and Kay Boodle WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2595 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flies Inside The Sun User:Nigelthefish 14:15, 28 March 2006 (UTC) keep Never heard of them but seems to fit Deletion of Flies Inside The Sun WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2596 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cwm Twrch transmitting station User:Trevj 10:28, 24 May 2012 (UTC) comment Similar deletion discussions have taken place in the past: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saddleworth Transmitting Station|AfD/Saddleworth Transmitting Station, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caradon Hill transmitting station|AfD/Caradon Hill transmitting station. The latter mentions Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of North Carolina Tower Chapel Hill|a number of such articles in the US. otability requires verifiable evidence|Notability requires verifiable evidence, so even an unsourced assertion isn't generally enough Deletion of Cwm Twrch transmitting station WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2597 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University Mall (Little Rock, Arkansas) User:JoshuaZ 06:06, 9 November 2006 (UTC) delete per nom. There is nothing notable about this mall. I'm not even sure it meets |verifiability even before we get to notability Deletion of University Mall (Little Rock, Arkansas) WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2598 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HandWiki User:David 05:39, 7 September 2020 (UTC) delete """no evidence of passing . The only independent sources I could find for anything by this name were for a small, defunct and unrelated 2012 """"handwiki"""" project of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Becoming big by making a copy of Wikipedia is not cause for notability; it just means you're a scraper""" Deletion of HandWiki WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2599 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Billboard Hot 100 number-two singles of 2015 User:Clean 00:50, 13 June 2015 (UTC) delete Clealy fails and . That's what this article is Deletion of List of Billboard Hot 100 number-two singles of 2015 WP:LISTN||WP:IINFO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2600 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New World Thorndon User:The 11:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC) delete as |non notable Deletion of New World Thorndon WP:NN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2601 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sajad H Hamdani User:AllyD 20:36, 18 April 2013 (UTC) delete The article text just indicates that the subject completed a degree and has a job. The criteria require much more than that, and I have found no evidence that ths person meets these Deletion of Sajad H Hamdani :WP:ARTIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2602 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dysfunctional Family Circus User:Verdatum 16:41, 24 June 2008 (UTC) delete """While I regret to say |I've heard of it, it's only worth a footnote in an encyclopedic sense. Don't confuse articles mentioning the phrase """"Dysfunctional Family Circus"""" with articles actually related to the parody comic""" Deletion of Dysfunctional Family Circus WP:IKNOWIT Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +2603 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David C. Mabie User:Bearcat 17:36, 7 December 2016 (UTC) delete """As always, unelected candidates for office are not entitled to Wikipedia articles because candidate — if you cannot provide and source credible evidence that they get over another notability criterion for some other reason, then they do not pass until they ''win'' the seat. This makes no such claim, however, and its only """"source"""" is a (deadlinked) raw table of election results of the type that just nominally verifies ''all'' of the candidates' existences and vote totals, but fails to provide ''substantive'' content ''about'' them. There's just no grounds for an article here""" Deletion of David C. Mabie WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2604 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Footballdatabase.eu User:Spiderone 16:05, 4 December 2020 (UTC) delete a very useful website for me as a fan of football stats but, unfortunately, fails and Deletion of Footballdatabase.eu WP:NWEB||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2605 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Burgwedel stabbing [[User talk:92.11.149.25|talk]]) 23:10, 16 April 2018 (UTC) keep something'' meets here. It could be this article should be merged into and redirected towards 2018 German stabbings or even knife crime in Germany. Or, per , maybe it'll be alright as a standalone piece. But the information here should be retained in one form or another and once the dust settles merging can be discussed without heading to AfD. -- BobTheIP editing as Special:Contributions/92.11.149.25|92.11.149.25 Deletion of 2018 Burgwedel stabbing WP:GNG||WP:RAPID Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2606 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Craig (Jeopardy! contestant) User:Armbrust 18:02, 25 September 2010 (UTC) delete as he is |only notable for one event (winning many money on a game show) and |Wikipedia is not the news Deletion of Roger Craig (Jeopardy! contestant) WP:ONEVENT||WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2607 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/End of roman republic User:Nick 02:24, 18 May 2014 (UTC) delete per nom and per Deletion of End of roman republic WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +2608 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Laing [[User talk:146.198.67.160|talk]]) 10:36, 2 August 2019 (UTC) keep per / . Just needs work. Special:Contributions/146.198.67.160|Boleyn Deletion of Jamie Laing WP:BASIC||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2609 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Proctor User:David 21:09, 29 March 2008 (UTC) delete Still looks like an A7 speedy to me, but let's finish the AfD so that we can salt and/or use #G4 in future Deletion of Bob Proctor WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +2610 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berandal User:Narutolovehinata5 22:27, 26 October 2013 (UTC) keep Has received significant coverage in reliable sources, thus passing Deletion of Berandal WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2611 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SoundCloud rap User:Krishna 12:56, 12 October 2017 (UTC) keep The coverage is quite good, passes . Regards Deletion of SoundCloud rap WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2612 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boity Thulo User:onel5969 13:47, 4 December 2015 (UTC) keep while I agree with the assessment of the current source, there is quite a bit out there on this actress. I also think this is a case of why is she notable, but she does at least pass , if not , as shown by articles http://www.bellanaija.com/2015/11/19/8-times-cassper-nyovest-boity-gave-us-couplegoals-while-on-a-romantic-vacation/ here, http://www.sundayworld.co.za/shwashwi/2015/11/06/cassper-nyovest-and-boity-on-baecation-photos here, http://www.channel24.co.za/The-Juice/Boity-Thulo-I-also-had-to-drop-out-of-university-20151022 here, http://mg.co.za/article/2015-07-16-boity-thulo-dispels-reports-of-her-engagement-to-cassper-nyovest here, http://www.channel24.co.za/The-Juice/Boity-Thulo-I-choose-Refiloe-every-day-20151030 here, http://www.channel24.co.za/The-Juice/Nandi-and-Boity-rubbish-feud-claims-20151012 here, http://www.iol.co.za/tonight/music/childish-boity-stirs-trouble-at-mamas-1.1887513#.VmGYZ_-FPIU here, http://connect.citizen.co.za/28107/boity-leaves-unpaid-bill-for-somizi/ here, and http://www.timeslive.co.za/entertainment/celebrity/2015/03/08/boity-thulo-pulls-an-emma-watson-with-speech-on-womens-rights here. And that's just on the first two pages at News Deletion of Boity Thulo WP:BASIC||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2613 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tobi Bakre (2nd nomination) User:Versace1608 13:51, 3 May 2020 (UTC) keep The subject passes and the first criterion of . He played a major role in ''Sugar Rush (2019 film)|Sugar Rush'', a film currently occupying the fourth spot on the list of the highest grossing Nigerian films of all time. He also had a major role in Kunle Afolayan's ''Mokalik'', a notable film that has been critically reviewed by https://www.premiumtimesng.com/entertainment/nollywood/365003-movie-review-kunle-afolayans-mokalik-thrives-on-memory-not-viewer-satisfaction.html ''Premium Times'', https://tns.ng/review-kunle-afolayan-mokalik/ TNS, https://ynaija.com/film-review-kunle-afolayans-mokalik-isnt-quite-a-return-to-form/ ''YNaija'', https://www.nollywoodreinvented.com/2019/09/mokalik.html Nollywood Reinvented, https://thelagosreview.ng/welcome-to-mokalik-where-little-things-count-temitayo-olofinlua/ The Lagos Review, and https://medium.com/@jobaoje/why-kunle-afolayans-mokalik-might-not-blow-your-mind-65a2e86bd0db Medium. Other reliable coverage of the film can be seen https://variety.com/2019/film/news/nigeria-kunle-afolayan-african-audiences-shouldnt-be-second-class-durban-film-festival-2019-1203274861/ here, https://www.pulse.ng/entertainment/movies/mokalik-5-things-you-should-know-about-kunle-afolayans-new-movie/qgtxk79 here and https://www.pulse.ng/bi/lifestyle/kunle-afolayans-movie-mokalik-is-the-latest-nigerian-movie-to-be-acquired-by-netflix/1pebj2d here Deletion of Tobi Bakre (2nd nomination) WP:BASIC||WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2614 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Little (singer) User:JamesBurns 00:40, 2 January 2009 (UTC) delete insufficient notability, as per Deletion of Angela Little (singer) WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2615 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visions of Violence (film) User:ReaderofthePack 09:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC) delete There's nothing out there for this film to establish how it's individually notable. Assuming the other film is notable, notability is |not inherited from the other film. IMDb is not usable as a source on Wikipedia because it's easy to submit false or incorrect information. It doesn't mean that the info here is incorrect, just that the abuse from others has been so bad that IMDb just isn't reliable. Even if it could be used, it would be a database listing at best and couldn't give notability. Since notability is an issue here, I'll investigate the other film to see if it also has notability issues Deletion of Visions of Violence (film) WP:NOTINHERITED Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +2616 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evan siemann User:Crusio 15:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC) keep Very strong citation record indicating that he is a major influence in his field. Web of Science lists several publications with hundreds of citations each (top 5: 598, 329, 207, 198, 126). Given that ecology is a field with rather low citation density makes this record even more impressive. Obviously meets #1 Deletion of Evan siemann WP:ACADEMIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2617 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Shale [[User talk:90.195.111.82|talk]]) 09:27, 27 June 2011 (UTC) keep because if it's deleted from Wikipedia it'll cause conspiracy theories as there were over David Kelly. Important because of his comments to a national party newspaper about Conservative Party membership shortly before he died and close links to Prime Minister. Chair of a local Conservative association is not a politician so doesn't apply, just an office-holder within a political party. — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/90.195.111.82|90.195.111.82 Deletion of Christopher Shale WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2618 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FaultTrack User:Monty845 23:58, 12 October 2011 (UTC) delete Does not appear to pass or . Note, I Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/FaultTrack|declined the AfC submission for this company before this was created in article space Deletion of FaultTrack WP:GNG||WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2619 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Åke Raask User:onel5969 19:00, 18 October 2015 (UTC) delete searches did not turn up anything on the subject which meets the notability criteria for either or Deletion of Åke Raask WP:NFICT||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2620 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabian Benko User:Sir 16:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC) delete He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails and Deletion of Fabian Benko WP:NSPORT||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2621 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future Naruto User:NeoChaosX 07:18, 3 January 2007 (UTC) delete This in violation of so many policies it's not even funny. a crystal ball, fan fiction doesn't meet notability guidelines, it's unverifiable (), has no reliable sources () and is entirely original research ( Deletion of Future Naruto WP:NOT||WP:FICTION||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NOR Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2622 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewish Life Network User:Arnzy 13:12, 20 June 2006 (UTC) delete per as nn organisation Deletion of Jewish Life Network WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2623 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Sajid User:TheGreatWikiLord 03:26, 11 October 2018 (UTC) delete does not meet any of the criteria for perpetrators under . Most of the coverage is trivial Deletion of Mohammed Sajid WP:CRIME Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2624 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Alan Gallant User:Coredesat 07:32, 28 June 2006 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Greg Alan Gallant WP:BIO||WP:VAIN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2625 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alberget 4A User:Djsasso 11:59, 23 April 2014 (UTC) merge or delete. I am leaning towards merge but it definitely does not meet the as there is no significant coverage in independent sources so at the very least it should be merged Deletion of Alberget 4A WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2626 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sissy nation User:DeadlyAssassin 09:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC) delete or at the very least a complete overhall to focus on the book as long as notability can be established. I concur that the content appears to be nothing more than an ad for the book and it's author at the moment. There does not appear to be , certainly no references to trusted sources - it is perhaps telling that the top returned links on Google are the books' own website. Fails the standards in Deletion of Sissy nation WP:V||WP:NB Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2627 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ace Combat X Super Aircraft User:Kunzite 00:54, 23 December 2006 (UTC) merge """to Ace Combat X Super Aircraft per for now. (If the entire series or articles on fictional airplanes was put up for deletion, I'd vote '''transwiki/delete''' because of the previously mentioned precendent. One by one AFDs often lead to confusing and uneven enforcement of policy.) The target article is very light on substance. (It has one large table a few paragraphs of text.) X-02 Wyvern, ADF-01 Falken, and XFA-27 should be summarized on the page. Fenrir (Ace Combat) should be merged to the page. All of them need to have the game guide elements removed. (i.e. """"Unlocking""" Deletion of Ace Combat X Super Aircraft WP:FICTION Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2628 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Kastle User:Pburka 18:14, 21 February 2009 (UTC) keep Signed to a major record label. Well sourced. Easily passes Deletion of Richard Kastle WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2629 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greek Catholic Church, Şimleu Silvaniei User:Xanchester 20:11, 24 October 2012 (UTC) delete Church was recently built and it's |too soon for it to be either culturally or historically significant. There are no reliable secondary sources demonstrating its notability, and a search for http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Greek+Catholic+Church%22+%22Simleu+Silvaniei%22&btnG=Search&hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws news articles doesn't bring up anything. The subject does not meet the |general notability guidelines Deletion of Greek Catholic Church, Şimleu Silvaniei WP:TOOSOON||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +2630 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristy Holtfreter User:Joseph2302 16:22, 2 November 2020 (UTC) delete per - now that identity has been confirmed, BLPREQUESTDELETE says we can delete for marginally notable people, which applies here Deletion of Kristy Holtfreter WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +2631 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roll a D6 User:Torchiest 20:00, 23 November 2011 (UTC) keep Meets the requirements, as it has significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources Deletion of Roll a D6 WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2632 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prime Plaza Hotels and Resorts User:HighKing 13:07, 17 September 2018 (UTC) delete Wikipedia is not a Yellow Pages nor a platform for promotion. None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability as they all appear to rely or are based on company press releases or quotations/interviews with connected companies or people. References fail . Topic fails GNG and Deletion of Prime Plaza Hotels and Resorts WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2633 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Beckett User:Pharaoh 03:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC) delete Fails and the coverage is routine.Now the the subject has played http://www.espncricinfo.com/australia/content/player/10268.html just 1 List A Match in which his contribution was insignificant and has retired now the subject technically meets as he has played just 1 Match but the subject comprehensively fails the |General Notability Guideline and has long retired thus ending any scope of future contribution or any hope of meeting General Notability Guideline Deletion of David Beckett WP:GNG||WP:NCRIC||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2634 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Batman User:Apostrophe 08:41, 10 February 2007 (UTC) delete WP:NOR and a plot summary. The idea of an absolute timeline for a DC character is ridiculous, as adherence to such a timeline, if it exists, is never a concern for writers. Also, where are the sources for exact years? Where is the source of Jason Todd becoming robin and dying in the same year Deletion of Timeline of Batman WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2635 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/109th and Broadway fire User:Calvin 05:19, 18 July 2008 (UTC) delete fails the notability standard: a quick mention in the NY Times isn't enough. #NEWS also another thing Deletion of 109th and Broadway fire WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2636 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michaelwood services User:Ajf773 23:03, 14 July 2018 (UTC) delete per , and . This is hardly a major shopping complex, it's a service station with a few shops attached Deletion of Michaelwood services WP:NOTGUIDE||WP:NOTDIR||WP:GNG Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2637 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J Gramm User:Richard3120 17:32, 15 August 2016 (UTC) delete """fails and . The YoRapper and ''Complex'' references don't even mention J Gramm, and they are just about the two best sources in the article. As far as I can tell, the """"Grammy nomination"""" is for Wiz Khalifa's ''Blacc Hollywood'' album... but the link is tenuous – J Gramm was one of many producers who contributed to the album, and his contribution consists of co-writing and co-producing a bonus track on a limited edition of the album that was exclusively released through Target Corporation|Target stores. I don't believe this confers enough notability to be considered a """"Grammy nominee"""", particularly as the nomination is for the album and the performer. As has been stated above, the other mentions in the sources amount to little more than """"produced by J Gramm"""", and are not RS""" Deletion of J Gramm WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2638 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Gaucho (Israeli restaurant) User:Galatz 17:00, 26 February 2020 (UTC) keep The two people who said delete appear to only be looking in the article, unlike the nominator. The sources need to exist to establish notability, not just in the article. I have added about 4 sources to the article which are more than enough to meet the criteria for . There are many more out there, a search in Hebrew will come up with plenty of sources, searching in English will not, but being that this is an Israeli chain it makes sense to find mind in Hebrew Deletion of El Gaucho (Israeli restaurant) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2639 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Streetz User:On 19:20, 29 March 2008 (UTC) delete Fails criteria Deletion of Streetz WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2640 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ATI video card suffixes User:Sirfurboy 23:27, 16 January 2020 (UTC) delete per nom. Not sure what the creator was even thinking. I would think a list of products would make more sense, but then so it still should go Deletion of ATI video card suffixes WP:NOTCATALOG Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2641 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheep Tag (Warcraft III) User:Protonk 05:35, 5 May 2008 (UTC) delete Boy, the socks are out tonight. It doesn't MATTER if you think it is fun. I think the Myth II WWII mod was fun. that doesn't mean it gets an article in wikipedia. It gets an article in wikipedia if it is |notable, contains |verifiable information from |reliable sources and can allow the article to be written in a POV|neutral point of view. Otherwise, it should be deleted Deletion of Sheep Tag (Warcraft III) WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2642 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Daily Dot User:Bearian 18:37, 14 March 2017 (UTC) comment as a |source the subject itself this is unreliable as they come. Whether it's notable is a matter of opinion since |what is significant coverage is subjective here Deletion of The Daily Dot WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2643 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amirhossein Ipakchi User:GiantSnowman 17:55, 14 March 2014 (UTC) delete fail and Deletion of Amirhossein Ipakchi WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2644 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Bale User:Papaursa 02:52, 17 April 2017 (UTC) delete """His appearance for Australia at the """"world championships"""" was several levels below what is necessary to meet and the coverage is not enough to meet """ Deletion of Jonathan Bale WP:NHOCKEY||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2645 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What is Knowledge Management User:VasileGaburici 20:44, 8 November 2008 (UTC) delete and salt. Clearly a being recreated, and the title looks intended for google bombing Deletion of What is Knowledge Management WP:CFORK Wikipedia:Content forking 33 +2646 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yana Buchina User:Tomwsulcer 21:23, 1 November 2014 (UTC) keep International contender, competes worldwide, plays in the http://voiceofrussia.com/2009/10/19/2087392/ Kremlin Cup International and against top players such as http://voiceofrussia.com/tag_49398127/2011/04/25/ Martina Sirotkina and http://www1.skysports.com/tennis/news/12110/5543600/heartbreak-for-cornish Stephanie Cornish. Included http://www.cbssports.com/tennis/players/playerpage/1716482/2013/yana-buchina here in CBS Sports roster of tennis contenders, plus http://sportsnetwork.msnbc.com/merge/tsnform.aspx?c=sportsnetwork&page=tennis-w/stat/player.aspx?playerid=1632,season=2014 included here too and in a http://www.gotennis.ru/players/WTA/Yana%20Buchina.html Russian tennis database. A http://www.tennisrecruiting.net/article.asp?id=879&sessionid=08A42C391F13D1A4 write-up here and http://www.tennisrecruiting.net/article.asp?id=834&sessionid=08A42C391F13D1A4 here and a http://tenniskalamazoo.blogspot.com/2007/09/chasing-dream-russian-style-anaheim.html mention here and her http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/tennis/australianopen/4372955/Australian-Open-Day-10.html?image=1 photo here. She has numerous mentions in major international newspapers such as the ''Guardian'' http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/sep/13/us-open-order-of-play here and http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/sep/13/heather-watson-us-open here and http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/sep/07/us-open-order-of-play-day-eight here and has her photo http://www.theguardian.com/sport/gallery/2009/sep/14/heather-watson-us-open-girls-title here. While she is not one of the top women's singles players -- she is ranked 765 according to http://www.wtatennis.com/players/player/14158/title/yana-buchina this source -- still she's won almost $50K in prize money during her career. Still, I did not find a few in-depth reports on her, but if we combine the (numerous) reports about her, in important well-covered matches, in databases, using the rule |If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability then she passes notability Deletion of Yana Buchina WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2647 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Teens Against Crime User:Bearian 14:45, 12 November 2019 (UTC) delete per . I don't normally get involved in discussions about fictional organizations, but this one seems truly |common Deletion of American Teens Against Crime WP:SNOW||WP:MILL Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +2648 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Israt Jahan Ratna User:Govvy 09:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC) delete I don't think the creator of this article is SR Alamgir Khan, his editing was far more competent, and frankly this article and the others created by {{u|Sanyhd}} are far more naive. Back to the article, Bangladesh doesn't have a professional woman's league, it's more amateur level at current. If she was to play full international games that might be a different story but at the moment article fails . I really don't see met either Deletion of Israt Jahan Ratna WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2649 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tharindu Wijesekara User:ChamithN 05:36, 4 August 2015 (UTC) delete Doesn't meet . Youtube links to his videos cannot be considered as reliable sources as they are self published Deletion of Tharindu Wijesekara WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2650 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gripen vs Rafale vs Typhoon User:Kyteto NONE delete This article is a one-editor opinion piece that makes quite a few subjective conclusions in its body. While I hope not to be drawn into a point-counterpoint on those subjective issues, I wish to state that I do not see this article as meeting , as well as . — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Deletion of Gripen vs Rafale vs Typhoon WP:NPOV||WP:OR Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +2651 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arkam Asylum User:Esradekan 15:45, 3 July 2008 (UTC) delete article fails to establish notability as per Deletion of Arkam Asylum WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2652 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tulio Febres Cordero [[User talk:86.17.222.157|talk]]) 22:47, 7 December 2016 (UTC) keep per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tulio_Febres_Cordero&diff=753557429&oldid=753511069 the edit summary that I gave when contesting deletion. Special:Contributions/86.17.222.157|86.17.222.157 Deletion of Tulio Febres Cordero WP:PROD Wikipedia:Proposed deletion 92 +2653 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Meyer (American football official) User:Paulmcdonald 15:12, 2 October 2012 (UTC) comment for now. I don't think he's notable with his career as an NFL official because... well... there just aren't articles written about officials by name. I'm confident that the guideline does not extend to officials. However, he MIGHT be notable through other means, such as his college baseball career if there was significant coverage Deletion of Greg Meyer (American football official) WP:NGRIDIRON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2654 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Safiya Nygaard (2nd nomination) User:Otr500 13:57, 2 January 2018 (UTC) delete """WP:Notability|Not notable per |GNG and Wikipedia:Notability (people). |Refbombed with |primary sources. Many references to the same source (at least 10), per above comments of ''""""first party self-published sources""""'', like the YouTube sources from the subject, might count as providing referencing for content, but all count as one for notability, and content is not the issue here. Prima facie it looks good and also makes """"digging through them"""" harder. Those that are not YouTube are mainly advertising articles. When you click on them you have to wait for a pop-up ad, read it, or wait for a time period to delete. This is advertising and annoying. Refbombing is a good tactic because some (and those that don't check) will think it is referenced enough to be notable""" Deletion of Safiya Nygaard (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:REFBOMB||WP:PRIMARY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2655 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Time Superlation Theory User:DV8 19:46, 30 April 2006 (UTC) delete as vio Deletion of The Time Superlation Theory WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2656 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chiyo Miyako (2nd nomination) User:CommanderLinx 11:32, 26 November 2018 (UTC) delete to appropriate list. and should almost certainly apply here. There is absolutely nothing to say about her other than she was born, got married to a husband who traveled a lot, she liked eel, became the oldest in the world and then died. Majority of the article restates table info easily seen and better handled in Oldest people Deletion of Chiyo Miyako (2nd nomination) WP:NOPAGE||WP:PERMASTUB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2657 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gun Nut User:Calgary 21:11, 11 July 2007 (UTC) delete It is little more than a definition, with virtually no grounds for espansion, so it fails #DICTIONARY. Also, it's very POV, in that it discusses a POV topic not from a neutral standpoint, but as an excuse to coyly suggest that gun control is irrational by pointing out a Second Ammendment|conterargument that makes up the bulk of the article Deletion of Gun Nut WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2658 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Amazing Maurice User:Robert 21:08, 8 November 2020 (UTC) delete Please read |the film notability guideline in detail again. The guideline is often misread, and films in production sometimes get accepted because the guideline is misread, but films in production are only notable if production itself is notable. Normally notability does require reviews, and reviews require that the movie be viewed. The fact that the guideline is often misread doesn't change the guideline, which is that unreleased films are seldom notable Deletion of The Amazing Maurice WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2659 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Friday the 13th Sequel User:Wimt 08:55, 20 May 2007 (UTC) delete per all of the above. The article goes against #CRYSTALBALL and lacks any meaningful information, plus the only reference is an equally incomplete IMDB entry Deletion of Untitled Friday the 13th Sequel WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2660 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweet Brown User:Technical 00:44, 5 September 2013 (UTC) keep """as she meets the and has lasting coverage by extending past the meme to include an appearance in the 2013 Tyler Perry movie ''A Madea Christmas (film)|A Madea Christmas'' as well as her own reality show """"The Sweet Browns"""" currently in production""" Deletion of Sweet Brown WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2661 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heidi Behrens-Benedict User:MichaelQSchmidt 03:01, 20 October 2008 (UTC) keep """and tag for improvement and sourcing. There is a lot of coverage even for an """"also-ran"""" in reliable sources that pass : http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Heidi+Behrens-Benedict%22&btnG=Search Google Search, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=wn&q=%22Heidi+Behrens-Benedict%22 Google News""" Deletion of Heidi Behrens-Benedict WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2662 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baron, Angelo von Möller User:AllyD 12:10, 24 March 2018 (UTC) delete No |evidence of attained notability provided or found Deletion of Baron, Angelo von Möller :WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2663 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shuai Xiaobing User:David 00:54, 20 September 2015 (UTC) delete He appears not to pass , but that may be less relevant than as he does not appear to be an academic any more. Regardless, I also didn't find any evidence that he passes GNG Deletion of Shuai Xiaobing WP:PROF||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2664 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tyrants (second nomination) User:Targeman 03:08, 8 August 2007 (UTC) delete per pure . There is absolutely no way this kind of list could ever be anything but a PoV dump. It's like making a List of stupid politicians, there isn't the slightest chance of any kind of consensus ever arising here; a guaranteed trollfest and edit battlefield, AfD magnet, surefire ArbCom customer, a waste of everybody's time, another unwanted stain on Wikipedia's reputation, I could go on and on Deletion of List of tyrants (second nomination) WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2665 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Identified User:Hello 13:48, 12 April 2008 (UTC) delete No |reliable sources. Fails #Albums and Deletion of Identified WP:RS||WP:MUSIC||WP:V Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2666 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Hall (lawyer) User:David 06:37, 29 August 2012 (UTC) delete Friends of Animals is notable but I don't think that being their legal director is enough on its own. I found some press stories quoting her in that role, but they said nothing nontrivial about her, so there is no sign of notability. Academic impact seems low, or maybe this is just an area that the tools I usually use to test that are bad at, but it doesn't matter, either way it means there's no evidence of notability there. And I can't find enough mainstream attention to her books for her to be notable that way Deletion of Lee Hall (lawyer) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2667 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fafner in the Azure terminology User:Non 16:04, 6 November 2015 (UTC) delete per the above concerns, author's request Deletion of Fafner in the Azure terminology WP:G7 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +2668 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantum-Touch (3rd nomination) User:MastCell 21:28, 17 March 2008 (UTC) delete """Fails all forms of |notablity, including and , due to a lack of non-trivial coverage in independent reliable secondary sources. The BBC reference is the definition of """"trivial"""" coverage, and the remainder of the sources are questionably reliable (e.g. promotional DVD's) and directly affiliated with the subject (hence not independent). At the very least, this should be redirected to energy therapy, though I think deletion would be more appropriate. Note that I noticed this AfD on the |fringe theories noticeboard, so take that for what you will""" Deletion of Quantum-Touch (3rd nomination) WP:N||WP:FRINGE||WP:ORG||WP:FTN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2669 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of legislators who support SOPA or PIPA User:Pharaoh 14:30, 19 January 2012 (UTC) delete As per nom ,LtNOWIS, shadowjams and .Even Former Co-Sponsors have shifted there position a supporter may change his support and opponent may support or abstain.It is current issue positions may change several times before the actual vote.Actual positions will only be known when they vote Deletion of List of legislators who support SOPA or PIPA WP:INDISCRIMINATE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2670 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of the Birds User:Whpq 16:08, 17 September 2013 (UTC) comment What |reliable sources have documented this rivalry. There's a lot of books written about baseball. I was unable to find a single one that even mentioned this rivalry Deletion of Battle of the Birds WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2671 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of art galleries in Colombia User:Ajf773 20:33, 9 February 2019 (UTC) delete Per . Only one linked entry, the rest are probably non notable Deletion of List of art galleries in Colombia WP:NOTDIR||WP:NOTPROMO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2672 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tagaru User:DrStrauss 13:22, 11 February 2017 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Tagaru WP:MOVIE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2673 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergio Sartorelli User:Colonel 13:33, 31 December 2009 (UTC) keep The nomination fails as there are clearly other sources for this notable designer. I have performed some cleanup on the article and added another source Deletion of Sergio Sartorelli WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +2674 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. User:VMS 01:53, 20 June 2014 (UTC) keep per above comments and Deletion of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. WP:LISTED Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2675 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best Believe It User:Wisdom89 NONE delete I don't feel that it's a matter of , but complete lack of verifiability and notability. If this is the case, then it fails album. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Billy+Arnold%22+music+%22best+believe+it%22&btnG=Search and http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Billy+Arnold%22+music+&btnG=Search — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Deletion of Best Believe It WP:HOAX||WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes 40 +2676 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inflation tax User:Mark 01:06, 10 March 2016 (UTC) comment """Doing a simple style search, I found the University of Chicago press book https://books.google.com/books?id=yvBS2KnhWSUC&dq=%22Inflation+tax%22+-wikipedia&source=gbs_navlinks_s Inflation, Tax Rules, and Capital Formation and an ECB working paper https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp038.pdf?a1cb4280848b9c3557120a146468f3ab THE OPTIMAL INFLATION TAX WHEN TAXES ARE COSTLY TO COLLECT as sources that discuss the inflation tax. Both have a nice overview of the the history of the concept in economics and show that """"inflation tax"""" seems to be a real concept used in the economics literature at least since the 1980s""" Deletion of Inflation tax WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +2677 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takuya Imahori User:Pharaoh 21:28, 30 September 2017 (UTC) delete per DGG fails Deletion of Takuya Imahori WP:ARTIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2678 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umar Saif User:ALM 20:20, 27 January 2007 (UTC) delete It fails . Nothing special about this person and have not achieved anything. Doing Phd at young age is not significant and neither is doing post doc from MIT Deletion of Umar Saif WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2679 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tolulope Arotile (2nd nomination) user:Andrew 21:38, 16 July 2020 (UTC) keep The subject is clearly notable as they pass and Deletion of Tolulope Arotile (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2680 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Thayer User:Ammarpad 08:22, 13 December 2017 (UTC) keep for passing , her work being kept at collection six notable museums. Also the referenced magazine is not niche and the writer of the referenced story is an award-wining author Deletion of Susan Thayer WP:ARTIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2681 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2002 Dudley earthquake User:Mikenorton 16:42, 14 March 2018 (UTC) comment """The problem with putting this earthquake back into the list (which was recently drastically shortened by me) is that such standalone lists should be lists of notable topics (assuming that this is an example of the first type mentioned in ) so for inclusion they should individually meet the criteria - to quote """"This standard prevents Wikipedia from becoming an indiscriminate list, and prevents individual lists from being too large to be useful to readers"""", which in my opinion the previous version of the list article was (~50k). I will try to think of other ways in which such non-notable events could be recorded without recreating the list as it was. We should not be trying to match the full British Geological Survey list of earthquakes""" Deletion of 2002 Dudley earthquake WP:CSC Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists 51 +2682 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of notable Star Wars substances User:Lugnuts 18:16, 9 September 2015 (UTC) delete This is |cruft at its best. Or worst Deletion of List of notable Star Wars substances WP:LISTCRUFT Wikipedia:Listcruft 66 +2683 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Imperial Lifeline User:Colonel 16:37, 25 March 2009 (UTC) keep Highly notable topic. Blatant case of failure to follow Deletion of British Imperial Lifeline WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +2684 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Osama bin Laden conspiracy theories User:Abductive 09:11, 3 May 2011 (UTC) delete """none of these """"theories"""" have any traction. By """"traction"""", I mean serious analysis and coverage in reliable secondary sources. Page consists of , and ing/editorializing""" Deletion of Death of Osama bin Laden conspiracy theories WP:SYNTHESIS||WP:COATRACK Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2685 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2002 George W. Bush pretzel incident (2nd nomination) user:mikkalai 19:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC) keep And write George Bush visits a Bulgarian Hospital if there are multiple reliable sources with sufficient text to write an article which will be more than a simple expansion of the article title. |Wikipedia is not paper. Public activities of notable public figures are notable Deletion of 2002 George W. Bush pretzel incident (2nd nomination) WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2686 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Gerald Lorge User:MrScorch6200 22:44, 22 July 2015 (UTC) delete per all above and Deletion of Robert Gerald Lorge WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +2687 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessie Elaban (2nd nomination) User:Sandals1 18:53, 8 January 2019 (UTC) delete Not close to meeting or , which is what pro wrestlers fall under. Only at the development level Deletion of Jessie Elaban (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:ENTERTAINER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2688 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pink's fifth studio album User:Esradekan 01:35, 13 August 2008 (UTC) delete Go The Deletion of Pink's fifth studio album WP:HAMMER Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law 11 +2689 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 MLS Reserve Division User:Bzweebl 16:55, 20 February 2012 (UTC) merge to MLS Reserve Division. Although there are reliable sources on the topics, they are generally not focused on events during the season but rather on the existence on the league itself, so the notability is directed on the league. Arsenalkid700's argument is merely Deletion of 2011 MLS Reserve Division WP:OTHERSTUFF Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +2690 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anything but Khamosh User:Kudpung 06:30, 26 October 2016 (UTC) delete and redirect to author page (whoever that is). Clearly fails Deletion of Anything but Khamosh WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2691 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gavin Hoyte (2nd nomination) User:Jrphayes 11:19, 4 March 2008 (UTC) delete Fails , though I do think this could be one of the cases were we use common sense and keep it, as one of the highest profile -failing players Deletion of Gavin Hoyte (2nd nomination) WP:BIO||WP:FOOTYN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2692 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Kerruish User:Crystallizedcarbon 21:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC) keep Does Meet as there is non-trivial coverage by multiple reliable sources Deletion of Sarah Kerruish WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2693 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamar El Or User:Roscelese 20:14, 24 May 2012 (UTC) keep Holding a named chair at a major university is a technical pass, but besides that, her books have been reviewed in a http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2074267 number http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/4131655 of http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/40316750 journals Deletion of Tamar El Or WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2694 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of rock epics User:Stifle 18:25, 6 March 2009 (UTC) delete """as an inherent violation of and . There is simply no way to independently determine whether a song is a """"rock epic""" Deletion of List of rock epics WP:NOR||WP:NPOV Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2695 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viswasara Tantra User:Jbhunley 21:01, 19 February 2018 (UTC) delete No evidence this passes or . See my comment above for my reasoning and concern Deletion of Viswasara Tantra WP:GNG||WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2696 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel J. Chin User:Nsk92 03:41, 16 July 2008 (UTC) keep The newscoverage of him is fairly substantial and it is not limited to the McCain episode. There are also news-stories from 2002-2004 (see the GoogleNews results above). GoogleBooks results are also substantial http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Gabriel+J.+Chin%22+&btnG=Search+Books - 104 hits. Also, he holds a named chair appointment at the University of Arizona (Chester H. Smith Professor of Law). Having a named chair appointment at a major university is a very reliable indicator of academic notability. Passes Deletion of Gabriel J. Chin WP:ACADEMIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2697 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern Link, Brisbane User:Nasica 04:11, 9 January 2009 (UTC) keep as per Oakshade. applies to things that will presumably happen in the future, but about which we don't know anything useful because it's so far away. The examples given include an election dozens of years in the future. This is clearly not the same category as a major motorway in the advanced planning stages (with multiple sources giving specific details) with construction scheduled to begin this year. In fact, the Northern Link falls under 'notable and almost certain to take place with preparation ... already in progress', which CRYSTAL specifically says is an allowable category of article Deletion of Northern Link, Brisbane WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2698 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cort Stevens User:Joe 00:36, 5 December 2009 (UTC) delete I can't find significant coverage for this |pornographic actor Deletion of Cort Stevens WP:PORNBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2699 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Come Alive (Leona Lewis song) User:Trevj 15:42, 6 February 2013 (UTC) merge """to Glassheart, per . The coverage is not {{tq|more than a trivial mention}}.http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/news/a389265/leona-lewis-discusses-new-tracks-at-hackney-weekend.html Leona Lewis discusses new tracks at Hackney Weekend - Music News - Digital Spyhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/music/reviews/jqpn BBC - Music - Review of Leona Lewis - Glasshearthttp://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/thesound/a409004/leona-lewis-new-album-glassheart-first-listen.html Leona Lewis new album 'Glassheart': First listen - Music News - Digital Spyhttp://www.musicrooms.net/music/news/leona-lewis-inspired-faithless/2897/ Leona Lewis inspired by Faithless | Musicrooms.nethttp://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/news/a431581/leona-lewis-faithless-inspired-new-album-glassheart.html Leona Lewis: 'Faithless inspired new album Glassheart' - Music News - Digital Spyhttp://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/albumreviews/a430007/leona-lewis-glassheart-album-review.html Leona Lewis: 'Glassheart' - Album review - Music Album Review - Digital Spyhttp://www.virginmedia.com/music/reviews/leona-lewis-glassheart.php Leona Lewis: Glassheart Album Review - Reviews - Music - Virgin Mediahttp://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2012/oct/11/leona-lewis-glassheart-review Leona Lewis: Glassheart – review | Music | The Guardianhttp://www.thenational.ae/arts-culture/music/leona-lewiss-glassheart Leona Lewis's Glassheart - The Nationalhttp://steveandersonproductions.com/leona-lewis-at-hackney/ Leona Lewis At Hackneyhttp://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-312837130.html Good, but playing safe | Daily Post (Liverpool)http://www.shangay.com/nota/30224/critica-glassheart-de-leona-lewis Crítica - """"Glassheart"""" - de Leona Lewishttp://www.hitchecker.de/gehoert/cd-mp3/2236-leona-lewis-glassheart-cd-kritik.html Scherben-Risiko: Beats gefährden Leonas Herz aus Glashttp://www.ireport.cz/recenze/16488-recenze-leona-lewis-se-na-glassheart-posouva-vpred-jen-po-ma-lu.html RECENZE: Leona Lewis se na Glassheart posouvá vpřed jen po-ma-luhttp://www.4music.com/news/news/4957/Leona-Lewis-premieres-album-track-Come-Alive Leona Lewis premieres album track Come Alive | 4Music Consideration of stand-alone existence (as a split from the album) is not ''solely'' limited to the - however, that's close in this case (37 kB, 6329 words """"readable prose size"""" for ''Glassheart'')... but independent notability isn't established""" Deletion of Come Alive (Leona Lewis song) WP:GNG||WP:SIZERULE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2700 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sei Muroya User:GiantSnowman 15:57, 5 March 2016 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Sei Muroya WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2701 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regan bauman User:Edison 20:24, 8 September 2010 (UTC) delete per nomination for failure to satisfy , even if claims were true. Found nothing at IMDB Deletion of Regan bauman WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2702 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Practicing for Love: A Memoir User:DESiegel 04:37, 18 May 2020 (UTC) delete unless multiple |independant published |reliable sources are found and cited. I looked and did not find any. There should be no prejudice against later recreation '''if''' proper sources to demonstrate notability become available later Deletion of Practicing for Love: A Memoir WP:IS||WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2703 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hypnose (cigarette) User:Cocytus 22:18, 6 January 2010 (UTC) delete does not appear to satisfy in order to merit inclusion Deletion of Hypnose (cigarette) WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2704 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Favorite Highway User:Darth_Panda 05:10, 23 November 2008 (UTC) delete Only http://news.google.com/news?q=%22My%20Favorite%20Highway%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&rls=com.ubuntu:en-US:unofficial&client=firefox-a&um=1&sa=N&tab=wn three Google News hits from non-mainstream news sources. I'd almost argue that this falls under . Either way, they fail and deserve deletion Deletion of My Favorite Highway WP:A7||WP:BAND Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +2705 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1x1 music User:Esradekan 04:09, 27 November 2008 (UTC) delete fails notability per Deletion of 1x1 music WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2706 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yenitza Muñoz User:Jmertel23 16:46, 2 December 2019 (UTC) delete I haven't found any independent, in-depth, reliable sources either. I think it's for an article Deletion of Yenitza Muñoz WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +2707 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Civilica User:Anachronist 17:18, 5 August 2021 (UTC) delete with regrets - it seems to be the primary indexing service for scholarly conference proceedings in Iran, and I see mentions (but not coverage) of it on non-Iranian sites. This is enough of a claim of significance to prevent speedy deletion, but unfortunately not enough to pass Deletion of Civilica WP:A7||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +2708 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 Summer Tour User:Newslinger 18:08, 30 July 2018 (UTC) delete Not notable. Doesn't meet or . No significant coverage from reliable sources, just routine coverage. Reviews of the artists' concerts during this tour focus on the artists, and make no mention of the tour's name. Since it's a co-headlining tour, there's no suitable redirect target. —  Deletion of 2012 Summer Tour WP:GNG||WP:NTOUR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2709 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor Atelian User:Rzvas 19:29, 18 December 2018 (UTC) delete Fails FWIW Deletion of Taylor Atelian WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2710 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 North American heat wave User:Bearcat 18:32, 9 July 2018 (UTC) delete """In the age of climate change, it's very likely that almost ''every'' year will ''always'' be able to claim that ''some'' part of the world set new summer heat records at some point during the northern and/or southern summers — and it's certainly true that ''every'' summer ''always'' has a stretch of days that are hot enough that even if they're not quite ''record'' heat, are still hot enough ''somewhere'' that ''somebody'' deems it a """"heat wave"""". But it takes much more than that to turn a hot summer into a noteworthy heat wave — namely, it takes significant ''effects'' referenced to |reliable source coverage that ''supports'' the significance of the effects, and ''not'' just the ability to single-source the fact that ''somebody'' declared that a heat wave was ''happening''. But this is referenced to just one |routine weather report stating that a heat wave was on its way but had not yet hit at the time of the source's publication, which is not enough to make a """"heat wave"""" ''notable'' in and of itself""" Deletion of 2016 North American heat wave WP:RS||WP:ROUTINE Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2711 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabe Simon User:Northamerica1000 03:08, 9 March 2017 (UTC) merge to Kopecky (band) per -R; a valid search term. Source searches are providing some coverage, but it doesn't seem there's enough to qualify a standalone article Deletion of Gabe Simon WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +2712 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of animated feature films submitted for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film User:Erik 21:04, 21 June 2017 (UTC) delete per ; this rather specific cross-categorization does not seem to be discussed or listed outside Wikipedia Deletion of List of animated feature films submitted for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film WP:NOTESAL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2713 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Animal Crossing residents User:Wikipediatrix 03:24, 27 August 2006 (UTC) delete per nom. Fails Deletion of List of Animal Crossing residents WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2714 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poor Moon User:Sparklism 07:52, 28 March 2012 (UTC) keep While it is cleary |early days for this band, the success of their 'parent' band almost guarantees that Poor Moon will receive some serious coverage. I have added some sources to the article, and I believe this already shows that is met. --'''sparkl Deletion of Poor Moon WP:CRYSTAL||WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2715 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netconcepts User:WMMartin 13:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC) comment """Coming to this article as a new pair of eyes, my immediate reaction is deep unease. As it stands the article looks dangerously like spam/advertising. I'm deeply perturbed by the NZ Herald articles, which have all the hallmarks of lazy journalists cribbing from corporate press releases, and the other articles are slightly too hagiographic of the company's founder to make me feel they're unbiased. This is one of those """"snowball/heck"""" cases: I can see the way this debate's going, but my every instinct would be to '''delete''' for lack of real ( independent, non-press release ) sources. It doesn't seem to me that this article really passes , on the grounds that we don't have enough truly independent sources. At the very least, I'd like to suggest a good '''Clean up'''. I have a hunch we're being used here, but I can't put my finger on why""" Deletion of Netconcepts WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2716 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eimar O'Duffy User:Ginsengbomb 18:26, 27 August 2013 (UTC) keep Subject appears to have been a fairly prominent author in his time. Article in its current state is very poor, but subject seems very viable for inclusion. http://books.google.com/books?id=I_E2nQEACAAJ&dq=Eimar+O'Duffy&hl=en&sa=X&ei=uu4cUue1EeygsASypID4Bw&ved=0CDEQ6AEwATgK Here is one book devoted entirely to the subject's works, and https://www.google.com/search?q=Eimar+O'Duffy&oq=Eimar+O'Duffy&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60l2j0l3.203j0&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#fp=c2773ddb15015db4&q=Eimar+O'Duffy&start=10&tbm=bks this Gbooks search reveals a lot of authors writing ''about'' the subject once you go to Page 2. Everything on Page 1 is the subject's own works. Appears to be fairly heavily-cited on http://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=0&q=Eimar+O%27Duffy&hl=en&as_sdt=0,33 Google Scholar as well. Keep per |the relevant notability guideline Deletion of Eimar O'Duffy WP:NAUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2717 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peg Norman User:ErikTheBikeMan 04:34, 11 September 2011 (UTC) keep per having filmed a notable film. Does not meet by itself, but still notable because of the film. Should not be penalized for not meeting one type of notability Deletion of Peg Norman WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2718 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Return (band) User:TenPoundHammer 16:26, 29 January 2008 (UTC) keep per Michig; band has had multiple major-label albums and at least one chart single, so they meet Deletion of Return (band) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2719 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuta (musician) User:Bearian 19:38, 5 August 2020 (UTC) delete I don't see how a |backup singer/dancer is |notable. Userfying this mess will only encourage |re-submission too soon Deletion of Yuta (musician) WP:MILL||WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill 32 +2720 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative versions of Mary Jane Watson User:TTN 14:56, 22 September 2020 (UTC) delete The topic fails and . It is not a proper content split, and the current content is not particularly worth merging Deletion of Alternative versions of Mary Jane Watson WP:GNG||WP:WAF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2721 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Kelblizz [[User talk:Begoon|Begoon]] 04:53, 14 June 2019 (UTC) delete per nom. Fails Deletion of DJ Kelblizz WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2722 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Periodicity User:Tavix 21:06, 30 January 2016 (UTC) keep as |useful. The disambiguation is used thousands of times a month and someone would definitely be looking for one of those topics. Deletion would be harmful as it would be harder for someone to get to one of those topics Deletion of Periodicity WP:IAR Wikipedia:Ignore all rules 63 +2723 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recombinant text User:SeanMD80 03:46, 14 January 2008 (UTC) delete with regret. , Deletion of Recombinant text WP:OR||WP:COI Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2724 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bookmap User:Whpq 21:08, 12 September 2006 (UTC) comment the second google search turns up a little more than that. There is a PDF file reporting from Dutch Ministry of Education studying the use of this learning tool. There's a bunch of entries that appear to be in Dutch which I am not able to read and evaluate. This learning tool may be locally notable in the Netherlands, but since I can't read Dutch, I can't tell. But I don't think it is a slam dunk failure of Deletion of Bookmap WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2725 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vermontcentric User:Eliz81 19:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC) delete """per nom, notability, and . """"The Great State of Vermont will not apologize for its cheese""" Deletion of Vermontcentric WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +2726 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noogenesis User:Xxanthippe 23:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC) delete Lacks RS Deletion of Noogenesis WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +2727 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Galaxy (computer game) User:Ace 11:24, 2 August 2006 (UTC) comment I'm pretty sure that is only for web sites, not web-based games. This still needs to assert notability, though Deletion of Dark Galaxy (computer game) WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2728 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of African American neighborhoods (2nd nomination) User:Fences 18:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC) comment """Has ''anyone'', including the nominator (see ), made any effort at all to look for sources? If reliable sources define an area as an """"African-American neighborhood"""" or a synonym, then we can accept that for the purposes of this article. So it's perfectly possible to make such a list. There's a whole book about the African-American neighborhoods in St. Petersburg, Florida.http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=0ph7kJD1EpcC There was a documentary made about Como, Fort Worth, Texas.http://cbs11tv.com/local/New.Documentary.Film.2.1348956.html Here's a source for Fountain Park, St. Louis.http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5g9TVnWjPbn2ouDVtpm2T_xEFyHsgD9C5MREO5""" Deletion of List of African American neighborhoods (2nd nomination) WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +2729 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mediacorp Channel 8 Upcoming Drama Series User:P199 15:27, 16 October 2012 (UTC) delete Clearly fails Deletion of List of Mediacorp Channel 8 Upcoming Drama Series WP:NOTTVGUIDE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2730 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of rebels user:Alf_photoman 23:29, 8 March 2007 (UTC) delete per and Deletion of List of rebels WP:NPOV||WP:LIST Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +2731 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SN Systems User:Thibbs 12:35, 23 May 2013 (UTC) keep """Significant amount of RS coverage thus it meets the |GNG. Considering the length of the """"ProDG (software)"""" article, I see no problem with merging that one into """"SN Systems"""" for the time being, but there seems to be enough RS coverage of even """"ProDG (software)"""" to merit a standalone article down the road. Outright deletion of either article per the noms would be unhelpful""" Deletion of SN Systems WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2732 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Menzoberranzan User:Zahakiel 17:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC) keep """Per my arguments at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rod_of_Seven_Parts, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artemis Entreri, Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mielikki_%28Forgotten_Realms%29, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruenor Battlehammer and the arguments of others at the similarly ill-advised Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Furyondy and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faerûn (this last is particularly relevant as it is a similar setting, and was almost - and should probably have been since there were many """"keeps"""" and only one """"merge"""" - snowball kept). Tedious, almost pointy nomination that ignores editor consensus; unfortunately becoming quite common in Articles for Discussion discussions. Amazing""" Deletion of Menzoberranzan WP:IDONTLIKEIT Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +2733 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecosse Heretic Titanium User:Chromancer 17:57, 23 May 2011 (UTC) delete I just want to go ahead and point out here that even the source cited in the article ''does not'' claim that it's the world's most expensive motorcycle, only that it was the most expensive ''new'' bike ''coming out recently''. i have to admit I'm a little amused that a one-sentence article is getting an AFD longer than it is. Nevertheless, this fails on every criteria: the secondary source is a trivial mention that does not in and of itself constitute notability. I could sell my kitchen table for two hundred thousand dollars and it'd likely make it the most expensive kitchen table put on the market recently, but I doubt I or my table get an article for it. —  Deletion of Ecosse Heretic Titanium WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2734 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban Bank [[User talk:61.10.165.33|talk]]) 14:56, 13 January 2014 (UTC) keep """due to the amount of coverage which demonstrates notability. I am going through and adding some citations as I am able. That said, I understand the temptation to this. Sky Harbor deserves a very large for creating multiple articles with dozens of kilobytes of text and '''zero''' citations in them https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Urban_Bank&oldid=53491295https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Banco_Filipino&oldid=53540102 (not to mention those """"Comparisons"""" sections that may very well be unsourceable ) and then leaving them to gather dust for eight years. Even in 2006, that was not an acceptable practice, and it would be nice if this AfD motivated him to finally step up and add at least some sources to these giant uncited walls of text, notwithstanding that . Regards, Special:Contributions/61.10.165.33|61.10.165.33""" Deletion of Urban Bank WP:RS||WP:TNT||WP:TROUT||WP:SYNTHESIS||WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2735 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venezuelan British User:Guest9999 08:57, 25 December 2008 (UTC) delete """there are clearly people who have links to both Venezuala and Britain but I don't see there being any evidence of """"Venezuelan British"""" being a noted or accepted term for such a group - or any coverage detailing the group (its history, culture, etc.). Barring any evidence of |reliable sources covering the group (that amount to more than a numerical statistic in a survey) I do not see how an article is possible. Wikipedia is not a publisher of #OR|original work, if no one else has written about the group we cannot |cobble together a piece that identifies them as one""" Deletion of Venezuelan British WP:RS||WP:NOT||WP:SYN Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2736 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhoot Police User:Serial 17:46, 13 April 2019 (UTC) delete per nom and . Etc Deletion of Bhoot Police WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2737 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dead rappers User:Arkyan 15:19, 12 April 2007 (UTC) delete as failing . No need to categorize either, doing so would be overcategorization Deletion of Dead rappers WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2738 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antoinette Clinton User:Alf 16:22, 31 January 2007 (UTC) delete unless properly sourced and referenced i.a.w. and/or Deletion of Antoinette Clinton WP:MUSIC||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2739 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mineral waste User:Alan 07:17, 28 October 2011 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Mineral waste WP:DICTDEF Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +2740 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gopal Krishna Trivedi User:AustralianRupert 04:57, 5 November 2016 (UTC) delete doesn't seem to satisfy the requirement for |significant coverage. Regards Deletion of Gopal Krishna Trivedi WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2741 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trans Student Equality Resources User:Dricherby 11:11, 12 May 2013 (UTC) delete My best wishes to the organisation and its work but I couldn't find the sources needed to meet the |General Notability Guidelines Deletion of Trans Student Equality Resources WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2742 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel User:Knowledgekid87 21:35, 13 July 2014 (UTC) delete per and . The rocket attacks on Israel are notable, do we need a list of every single attack though? No, the main article pretty much sums up the attacks and people killed. I find this list un-encyclopedic just as a list of rocket attacks by Israel would be, its overkill in terms of details, and the attacks have become routine news Deletion of List of Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel WP:NOTDIR||WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2743 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alli L!ve User:Armbrust 13:25, 4 November 2010 (UTC) delete per the lack of significant coverage in |reliable sources Deletion of Alli L!ve WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2744 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhys Williams, sociologist User:AlexTiefling 09:38, 26 September 2008 (UTC) delete Essentially a case of |a person notable for one thing only Deletion of Rhys Williams, sociologist WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +2745 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of pastries User:Northamerica1000 12:45, 4 May 2012 (UTC) keep """Per , """"It is neither improper nor uncommon to simultaneously have a category, a list, and a navigation template which all cover the same topic. These redundant systems of organizing information are considered to be complementary, not inappropriately duplicative. Furthermore, arguing that a category duplicates a list (or vice versa) at a deletion discussion is not a valid reason for deletion and should be avoided."""" This is a list of articles relevant to the notable topic of pastry""" Deletion of List of pastries WP:NOTDUP Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates 5 +2746 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ikonick User:HighKing 14:21, 3 February 2019 (UTC) delete Not a single reference meets the criteria for establishing notability. The references are entirely promotional, the article provides no indications of why this company is notable. References fails and/or . Article fails , and GNG Deletion of Ikonick WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:SPIP||WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2747 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Doyle (actor) User:Spy 20:23, 6 November 2019 (UTC) delete Article's subject neither meets nor Deletion of Peter Doyle (actor) WP:GNG||WP:ENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2748 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albi Sulo User:Ultraexactzz 18:24, 15 April 2010 (UTC) delete for now. Per , I'd imagine that Albi Sulo has a bright future ahead of him, both in the Tennis world and otherwise. However, an article is premature. If he is participating in the Davis Cup (a fact that isn't yet indicated at the Davis Cup website), then there will be some mention of his performance in the international press - and that might be enough, if he does well. But right now, all that we have is the fact that Tenniseurope.org once included him in its player rankings (but does not at present, according to their http://www.tenniseurope.org website). That's not enough for an article. I appreciate that there isn't really much of an Albanian Tennis Federation (per the above), but local offline press (newspapers and such) would also help to establish that Mr. Sulo is |notable. Lacking sources, though, we must delete Deletion of Albi Sulo WP:AGF||WP:N Wikipedia:Assume good faith 53 +2749 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs in Metalocalypse User:ThuranX 13:58, 22 July 2009 (UTC) delete """the term """"Unofficial MP3"""" suggests that it's actually another file format; I'm aware that it more likely means 'Recorded from my DVR'd episode collection'. that in turn means that they're hazarding a guess as to what it was actually titled by the show's production studio/writers/the living band members. It can easily lead to duplications by assigning the song two different names, neither of which can be confirmed. The use of the term to apply to MP3s downloadable via the show or creators sites gives the patina of legitimacy to the pirated material. I'm not sure that the article can be saved without appearing to be a duplication of the DethAlbum article. Alternately, a new article 'Non-album releases by Metalocalypse' can be created for the limited release, non-album songs which can be efffectively documented. Either way, all that 'unofficial MP3' stuff needs to be gone fast as , and a generally bad idea for oour articles to be seen as endorsing media piracy""" Deletion of List of songs in Metalocalypse WP:OR||WP:SYNTH Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2750 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Wykes User:Dane 05:09, 27 March 2018 (UTC) keep Appears to pass Deletion of Adrian Wykes WP:NSPORTS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2751 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russian invasion of Ukraine (2014) User:Knowledgekid87 21:19, 1 September 2014 (UTC) delete per , No concrete evidence yet that Russia invaded Ukraine, might want to wait for a declaration of war or something, because it is not in Deletion of Russian invasion of Ukraine (2014) WP:POVFORK||WP:RS Wikipedia:Content forking 33 +2752 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idriss Aberkane User:David 03:43, 16 November 2015 (UTC) keep I only found two of what look like reliable in-depth independent sources on the subject http://www.lanouvellerepublique.fr/Vienne/Actualite/Dossiers-actualite/n/Contenus/Dossiers/Actualite/Jeunes-Express/Initiatives/Idriss-Aberkane-l-accoucheur-des-geeks-de-Gatine-1772253 http://mg.co.za/article/2015-09-23-the-geeks-shall-inherit-the-earth (one in French but that makes no dfference for notability). But two may be enough for . On the other hand, the article needs a lot of cleanup Deletion of Idriss Aberkane WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2753 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFO sightings in China User:Bobrayner 00:25, 2 June 2014 (UTC) delete as a vague non-notable -magnet. Although I would not oppose demerging Meng Zhaoguo or starting a fresh article there Deletion of UFO sightings in China WP:FRINGE Wikipedia:Fringe theories 44 +2754 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farm to Market Road 1417 User:Dravecky 05:43, 27 October 2015 (UTC) keep per as a notable state-maintained highway. Perhaps in the future a case could be made for merging it to List of Farm to Market Roads in North Texas but as that article isn't even a complete shell yet merger now would be inappropriate Deletion of Farm to Market Road 1417 WP:ROADOUTCOMES Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +2755 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Count Reginald Alford Promquery User:RHaworth 14:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC) comment So if you like it, copy it to . And curses I missed the initials Deletion of Count Reginald Alford Promquery WP:BJAODN Wikipedia:Silly Things 52 +2756 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Norwegian photographers (2nd nomination) User:Scapler 23:31, 26 December 2008 (UTC) keep """Per ists: """"Redundancy between lists and categories is beneficial because they are synergistic"""" and ategories, lists, and navigation templates: """"Lists can include items that are not linked...or items for which there are yet no articles (red links)"""" and """"Categories do not support other forms of tracking, such as adding red links. (Red links are useful as gap indicators and as task reminders to create those articles""" Deletion of List of Norwegian photographers (2nd nomination) WP:L||WP:C Wikipedia:Lists 36 +2757 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael L. Baird User:John 05:33, 25 September 2018 (UTC) delete """Seems to also fail , since he's only notable for the Dannielynn Stern case and not for academia (or, technically, being a """"media consultant"""" for NBC w/ OJ). Perhaps redirect to Dannielynn Stern if somebody ever wanted to look him up on here, but I don't think that's warranted""" Deletion of Michael L. Baird WP:ONEEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2758 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion//r/The Donald User:That NONE keep """and I'm leaning towards ''speedy''. Just because topics involved with this forum are elsewhere does not preclude this article existing. I'm unconcerned about this """"opening the door"""". If the sources establish notability, that's enough. Per {{tq|The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself}}. A brief examination of the sources used in this article shows this sub-reddit meets that criteria""" Deletion of /r/The Donald WP:WEBCRIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2759 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Financial democracy User:COMPFUNK2 00:56, 29 September 2009 (UTC) delete Interesting essay, but |Wikipedia is not a soapbox Deletion of Financial democracy WP:SOAP Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2760 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesusry User:RockMFR 03:51, 30 November 2006 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Jesusry WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +2761 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kris Slater User:ArcAngel 19:56, 12 March 2008 (UTC) delete for failing Deletion of Kris Slater WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2762 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of UK Admiralty Charts, 1967 User:Reywas92 14:18, 15 July 2021 (UTC) delete This is basically a copy-paste of the https://archive.org/details/catalogue-admiralty-charts-hydrographic-publications-1967-images/page/24/mode/2up ''Catalogue of Admiralty Charts 1967 Complete Edition'' and I fail to see why this directory of maps available in that year is a notable encyclopedic topic, sourced only to this primary source which it replicates. This link – which can certainly be useful – should be highlighed in the Admiralty chart but it's not clear what makes this catalogue an article Deletion of List of UK Admiralty Charts, 1967 WP:CATALOG Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2763 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryce Hall (internet personality) User:Mrschimpf 22:03, 28 October 2020 (UTC) delete Outside the bottom section where his parties/power being turned out can be sourced, the rest of the article is pretty much standard 'People article/sources say' or 'get 500 words around a social media post' questionable. I've contributed a few things to this article (including removing more questionable love life gossip), but I don't feel this subject meets myself Deletion of Bryce Hall (internet personality) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2764 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Corberán User:SportingFlyer 21:22, 25 August 2019 (UTC) keep Easily passes both and Deletion of Carlos Corberán WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2765 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Urban History User:Joe 14:46, 1 September 2016 (UTC) delete as a non-notable Deletion of Global Urban History WP:NEOLOGISM Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +2766 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Maruthi Yuvajana Sangam User:Elton 15:43, 7 July 2017 (UTC) delete fails . Non sourced article, found no reliable source while performing --Elton-Rodrigues — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Deletion of Sri Maruthi Yuvajana Sangam WP:ORG||WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2767 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mac OS 11 (2nd nomination) User:Baseball 02:36, 14 December 2011 (UTC) delete Per #G4 Deletion of Mac OS 11 (2nd nomination) WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +2768 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hiroyuki Owaku User:Prime 11:38, 19 July 2011 (UTC) delete Fails |general notability criteria: no independent reliable sources with significant coverage, interviews with Owaku all centered on the game series rather than on the person. Article is a verbose version of the MobyGames credits, and impossible to expand without biographical information Deletion of Hiroyuki Owaku WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2769 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diego Deiros User:David 20:25, 24 August 2016 (UTC) delete per unless evidence can be found showing something other than measuring the height of that one peak that he has gained attention for Deletion of Diego Deiros WP:BIO1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2770 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafael Leão User:PeeJay2K3 18:40, 29 August 2011 (UTC) delete Any assumption of notability would be based on a violation of Deletion of Rafael Leão WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2771 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracey Curtis-Taylor User:Aircorn 06:19, 30 October 2016 (UTC) keep This is a tricky one. I read the article, the above and most of the talk page and am in two minds still. Most of the good sources mention the flight and then the resulting controversy. It does lead into territory. Many other sources that mention other aspects are weak, but there are probably enough in between to justify keeping it. Maybe a merge would be the best solution, although I can't think of a suitable target Deletion of Tracey Curtis-Taylor WP:BIO1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2772 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seth Fleetwood User:Bearcat 16:35, 4 April 2021 (UTC) delete Bellingham WA is not a large or significant enough city to extend its mayors an automatic presumption of notability in the absence of a properly demonstrated pass of #2, cities don't get special exemptions from NPOL just because their population cracks 50K or because of their geographical locations per se, and this relies mainly on |primary sources rather than any significant volume of |reliable source coverage for the purposes of getting him past NPOL #2 Deletion of Seth Fleetwood WP:NPOL||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2773 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We Break the Dawn User:Hello 00:05, 1 April 2008 (UTC) comment I don't see how a single promotional blurb on a magazine's website equals notability. There's nothing like that in #Songs Deletion of We Break the Dawn WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2774 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Biden assault allegation User:Miniapolis 00:13, 16 April 2020 (UTC) delete this |POVFORK per nom, |NOTNEWS and |WEIGHT Deletion of Joe Biden assault allegation WP:POVFORK||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:WEIGHT Wikipedia:Content forking 33 +2775 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudston Preparatory School User:Deor NONE merge to List of schools in Rotherham#Independent schools per The Whispering Wind and Deletion of Rudston Preparatory School WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +2776 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanchari Mondal User:Atlantic306 14:44, 22 February 2019 (UTC) keep as passes with multiple roles in notable productions and now has reliable sources references added to the article so it does need to be deleted in my view, thanks Deletion of Sanchari Mondal WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2777 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Ogletree User:Pdcook 15:29, 14 January 2011 (UTC) delete Only one acting credit listed on IMDB, and it's a minor one. Lack of coverage in RS. The NYTimes link is just a profile, not a full article. Fails and Deletion of Jennifer Ogletree WP:ENT||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2778 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jewish Fellows of the Royal Society (3rd nomination) User:Morton_devonshire 07:29, 26 June 2007 (UTC) delete per nom. is prohibited by our rules here Deletion of List of Jewish Fellows of the Royal Society (3rd nomination) WP:SYNTH Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2779 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IWTNC User:Mathwiz2020 01:36, 30 December 2005 (UTC) delete as per . —  Deletion of IWTNC WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2780 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boston Luxe Real Estate LLC User:AllyD 07:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC) delete Multiple searches turn up no |evidence that this firm is |notable Deletion of Boston Luxe Real Estate LLC :WP:RS||:WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2781 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James P. Morrison User:Tony 20:41, 8 October 2009 (UTC) delete the subject doesn't appear to meet guidelines for notable musicians at this point. Come back when he's signed to a notable label, touring and has a full-length album out, okay Deletion of James P. Morrison WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2782 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Santore User:Piotrus 16:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC) delete I couldn't find any coverage of him in GNews or GBooks. As written, the article fails . Verdict: non-notable artist Deletion of Robert Santore WP:CREATIVE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2783 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood Out (film) User:MichaelQSchmidt 02:16, 19 June 2010 (UTC) comment """SW: |Article topics must be notable, or """"worthy of notice."""" Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things like fame, importance, or popularity—'''although those may enhance''' the acceptability of a subject that meets the guidelines. A topic is presumed to merit an article if it meets the '''general notability guidelines''' and is not excluded by OT. A topic '''can also''' be considered notable if it meets the criteria outlined in any of the subject-specific guidelines listed on the right...."""" The subsections of do not overrule the |main notability guideline page... they support it and allow further considerations toward notability, and guideline are not set to be mutually exclusionary. Someone may fail GNG but pass ANYBIO. Someone might fail ANYBIO but pass GNG. So sorry... the topic does pass both and FF... through the notability of its production, as NFF is set in place to acknowledge that unreleased films might be found |notable through production receiving coverage in reliable sources... as this one is.... and there is absolutely no hint of it being in """"production hell"""".... quite the opposite. Further, it has distribution in place and a tentative release set for the end of the year. Lionsgate has locked distribution in the US, UK, and Canada... and Cinema Management Group of Los Angeles has locked sales in (so far) Australia, New Zealand, Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, Latin America, Poland, Turkey, Hungary, the Czech and Slovak Republics, Scandinavia, and the Middle East... seems folks want to show this film. Now had this film been something merely """"rumored"""", or something still in still in """"pre-production"""", I might tend to agree... but that's not the case. Considering who is involved, coverage has been continuing... and it is a bit of a strech to think that coverage |might somehow decrease as release draws near... and heck, even total failures that were never released can and have occasionally been found notable enough for Wikipedia... but hey... this ain't been claimed or shown a failure here by anyone""" Deletion of Blood Out (film) WP:N||WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:NFF||WP:GNG||WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2784 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edwin Markham Elementary School User:RightCowLeftCoast 23:26, 2 February 2011 (UTC) merge Since it doesn't meet on its own, in the pasts the general consensus has been to take useful information and place it into the parent article of the school district and redirect it to that parent article until which time sufficient information is found to establish notability and thus the article can be recreated as a . Although it is not currently active, I don't believe that should have any bearing as to whether it can meet notability guidelines or that it shouldn't be mentioned in the parent article. If that were the case, there are many articles about relatively non-notable ships that have long since meet the scrappers torches that shouldn't have articles. The fact that several hundred (if not thousand) individuals have passed through those institutions should be enough to meet Deletion of Edwin Markham Elementary School WP:GNG||WP:SPINOUT||WP:LOCAL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2785 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Jones (scientist) User:Russ 10:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC) delete I think it's here. The awards I see are early career, and don't contribute much to notability; similarly for the CAREER grant (see https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=503214). The citation record looks far short of C1 in what I believe to be a medium-high citation field. I don't see any other sign of notability Deletion of Lisa Jones (scientist) WP:TOOSOON||WP:NPROF Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +2786 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hack, (political slang) User:Coredesat 02:50, 25 August 2006 (UTC) delete as |unverifiable; |Wikipedia is not a slang dictionary Deletion of Hack, (political slang) WP:V||WP:WINAD Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2787 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. E. Hart User:AuthorAuthor 01:48, 4 February 2020 (UTC) delete per nom. This so-called article displays a total lack of Wikipedia notability guidelines. No coverage and no notability of the subject has been shown. An online search turned up nothing significant. Sorely fails and flunks Deletion of M. E. Hart WP:BIO||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2788 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Woodburn User:Fenix 08:02, 21 July 2016 (UTC) delete Fails |NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a |fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy |GNG Deletion of Ben Woodburn WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2789 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chakreshwar Bhattacharyya User:RebeccaGreen 16:30, 14 December 2018 (UTC) keep I am unable to find any significant sources in English. I can verify that he was associated with the Assamese literary journal ''Jayanti'', and I also discovered that he translated books from Hindi and Marathi into Assamese. Given that he was active in India from 1943-1969, it's possible that any sources that exist are not findable online, whatever language they are in. He may have received enough coverage or critical attention to be considered notable, but online sources do not provide any evidence beyond the basic facts of his work with the journal and translations. However, as this article was only created one week ago, and nominated for deletion on the same day (what happened to and ATD?) I would suggest keeping the article, tagging it with eg 'expert needed', adding it to relevant projects, and reviewing it after some time Deletion of Chakreshwar Bhattacharyya WP:BITE Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers 56 +2790 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paolo Sitanggang User:GiantSnowman 19:20, 28 January 2015 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Paolo Sitanggang WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2791 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Remmy Njoku (2nd nomination) User:onel5969 13:06, 20 January 2016 (UTC) delete I'm going to have to agree on this one. Simply not enough in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources to show they pass , and they clearly don't pass Deletion of Mary Remmy Njoku (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2792 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Smoke (Australian band) User:1292simon 01:33, 17 December 2012 (UTC) delete Does not pass Deletion of The Smoke (Australian band) WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2793 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/8 Flavahz [[User talk:132.3.17.68|talk]]) 20:10, 13 July 2012 (UTC) keep """The crew is notable for more than just ABDC as the members have appeared in music videos, movies, and other television performances and the author has provided citations for almost all of these events. I guess references were added after this article was nominated for deletion. References are also provided for the """"history"""" section which discusses how the group formed before appearing on ''America's Best Dance Crew''. This happened namely through World of Dance which, from my understanding, is a fairly large scale street dance competition. After reviewing the references, I feel that they meet the grounds of establishing the crew's notability as outlined in . They are all secondary sources so they meet as well. I just fact checked all the refs. The CollectiveUth ref wasn't working for me and the Hollywood Reporter ref doesn't prove that Charlize was in Rage Crew and/or present during that performance. However, the other 11 citations were working and they did validate the sentences that they supported. Aside from that, the article's tone is appropriate since it doesn't sound like an advertisement and it isn't unambiguously promotional. My only qualms are the """"Flavah"""" column in the members' table as I view this as pure and the """"dance competitions"""" category tag which is inappropriate since 8 Flavahs is not a competition but a dance crew that has participated in competitions. However, these are easily rememdied by simply removing them. For all these reasons, I vote """"keep"""". Special:Contributions/132.3.17.68|132.3.17.68""" Deletion of 8 Flavahz WP:GNG||WP:THIRDPARTY||WP:FANCRUFT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2794 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neston High School User:UserBob 22:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC) delete Fails not only , but it also astoundingly fails . School has received no major awards or accolades, just a regular, non-notable secondary school Deletion of Neston High School WP:GNG||WP:INDEPENDENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2795 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SHARKS! User:PJvanMill 16:41, 24 May 2021 (UTC) keep per the reasoning I gave special:permalink/1024886181#SHARKS!|here; basically, I think it passes the |GNG Deletion of SHARKS! WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2796 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pan (film) User:Arxiloxos 15:48, 29 February 2012 (UTC) keep """We should improve, not demolish, stubs on subjects of historical importance. Here's a 1997 Michael Wilmington review in the ''Chicago Tribune'': """"A fine film and a real discovery.""""http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1997-02-21/entertainment/9702210255_1_knut-hamsun-pride-and-shame-nine-films-screening/2 Norwegian film expert :no:Gunnar Iversen describes the film as being """"important in Norwegian film culture"""".http://ntnu-no.academia.edu/GunnarIversen/Papers/581876/The_Art_of_Hunger_Hamsun_Film_and_Modernity UCLA professor Arne Lunde discussed the film in his article """"Knut Hamsum at the Movies in Transnational Contexts.""""http://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlit/article/viewFile/688/654 Hamsun himself apparently didn't like the film so much, according to Donald Dewey's article in the ''Scandinavian Review'' (""""If the public liked ''Pan'', the author himself wasn’t too impressed. Reached by telephone by a reporter for his reaction to the screen adaptation, the fleetingly personable Hamsun snapped “I don’t understand film and I am in bed with the flu,” and hung up.""""http://www.amscan.org/pdf/SR.Fall10-Fall-p18-36.pdf, p.30. There's more potential sources hidden behind """"snippets"""" in GBookshttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&biw=1680&bih=892&tbs=bkv%3Aa&tbm=bks&q=Pan+Hamsun+Schwenzen&oq=Pan+Hamsun+Schwenzen&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=12&gs_upl=2432l7079l0l8346l3l3l0l0l0l0l101l298l2.1l3l0&gs_l=serp.12...2432l7079l0l8347l3l3l0l0l0l0l101l298l2j1l3l0, including something in a ''1923'' issue of the ''Scandinavian Review''. Mention may be appropriate here of , , and .I do think the article could (eventually?) be retitled to Pan (1922 film), although according to the Pan#Film|DAB page there apparently aren't yet articles on the other films based on Hamsun's novel""" Deletion of Pan (film) WP:BEFORE||WP:OFFLINE||WP:BIAS Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +2797 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clarence Smith (actor) User:Artene50 09:41, 30 July 2008 (UTC) delete as a likely The article's creator removed the content but I restored it for people to view Deletion of Clarence Smith (actor) WP:HOAX Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes 40 +2798 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Dnipropetrovsk fire (2nd nomination) User:Joaquin008 14:52, 8 September 2010 (UTC) delete per Deletion of 2009 Dnipropetrovsk fire (2nd nomination) WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2799 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ex-gay people User:Scheinwerfermann 15:27, 14 August 2011 (UTC) delete """I struggle to |AGF on the creation and maintenance of this list of names. It and its associated non-|RS-at-best sources appear to be little more than an attempt to manufacture the appearance of legitimacy for scientifically dubious/discredited ideas like Conversion therapy. That is on top of issues with |BLP and |N. The """"keep"""" arguments appear to boil down to a fatuous |""""I like it, so it should stay"""" and a ginned-up attempt at conjuring the spectre of some nebulous (but ooooh, so indubitably scary!) """"precedent"""" under which vast swaths of lists would have to be purged from Wikipedia. Fortunately for the clarity of this present discussion, the notion of this kind of """"precedent"""" is inapposite per OTLAW""" Deletion of List of ex-gay people WP:AGF||WP:RS||WP:BLP||WP:N||WP:LIKE||WP:NOTLAW Wikipedia:Assume good faith 53 +2800 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory A. Sandfort User:Brianhe 22:40, 9 June 2015 (UTC) delete as NN; the sources in the article are not just , but appear to be mirroring one another. Current news sources are just more routine PR stuff, and a rather expensive house sale Deletion of Gregory A. Sandfort WP:ROUTINE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2801 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Lucie West Centennial High School User:Antonio_Lopez 04:44, 17 February 2008 (UTC) delete Per above. The article is all |POV Deletion of St. Lucie West Centennial High School WP:POV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +2802 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Nimo (3rd nomination) User:Jimbo 08:29, 11 September 2008 (UTC) delete fails the criteria at #Athletes as he has never played in a fully-professional league or competition yet. Recreate if and when he ever does Deletion of Alex Nimo (3rd nomination) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2803 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan and Ken User:GarrieIrons 01:08, 7 June 2007 (UTC) comment """if you can provide RS for their being finalists you will probably find sufficient sources for each presenter to pass . Unless of course, nominations are based on """"your own station nominates every show for every eligible award""" Deletion of Dan and Ken WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2804 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playster User:scope_creep 12:24, 13 March 2019 (UTC) delete Fails and . Of the 16 references, 5 or 6 are dead and the rest discuss the launch. Very poor referencing. Also fails . No real coverage Deletion of Playster WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP||WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2805 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shekhey pind [[User talk:180.172.239.231|talk]]) 02:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC) comment If it exists, will be met, since wikipedia has a gazetteer function. But I'm struggling to prove its existence. Anyway, a '''redirect''' to Jalandhar district does no harm. '''Keep''' per its verified existence.--Special:Contributions/180.172.239.231|180.172.239.231 Deletion of Shekhey pind WP:GEOLAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2806 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radicals for Capitalism User:Ihcoyc 15:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC) keep with some regret. This would appear to be a history of http://unionsong.com/u062.html economanic pseudo-libertarianism that has nevertheless been noted and reviewed by the ''New York Times'', ''The Guardian'', and other disinterested general interest publications. It would therefore appear to be |notable under the relevant specific guideline Deletion of Radicals for Capitalism WP:BK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2807 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayman Ahmed El-Difrawi User:Sc 04:02, 29 September 2007 (UTC) delete Fails for notability Deletion of Ayman Ahmed El-Difrawi WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2808 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speculation about the papal conclave, 2005 [[User_talk:Radiant!|>Radiant<]] 09:25, 7 August 2007 (UTC) delete obviously fails Deletion of Speculation about the papal conclave, 2005 WP:NOR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2809 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crocker Highlands Elementary School User:DoubleBlue 04:49, 2 March 2008 (UTC) keep Enough reliable sources to establish a |verifiable, |NPOV, |NOR article, which are the inclusion requirements Deletion of Crocker Highlands Elementary School WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:NOR Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2810 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynno Lovert User:Versace1608 15:05, 15 April 2020 (UTC) delete The subject fails and . The movies he's starred in do not appear to be notable. The awards he is a recipient of are not notable Deletion of Lynno Lovert WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2811 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marion Lee Kempner User:The 20:23, 29 December 2017 (UTC) delete Does not meet either or ; notability is |not inherited from the fact a segment of an anthology mentioned his writing home. A man who served his country and sadly did not come home, but |Wikipedia is not a memorial Deletion of Marion Lee Kempner WP:GNG||WP:SOLDIER||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NOTMEMORIAL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2812 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BP Logix User:Tucoxn 04:17, 25 January 2014 (UTC) delete This article does not pass the relevant guideline for articles about companies: Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). The sources are not |reliable sources and all the ''KMWorld Magazine'' sources are not Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent of the subject. |Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion Deletion of BP Logix WP:RS||WP:SOAP Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2813 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrián Ochoa User:RightCowLeftCoast 05:20, 16 October 2014 (UTC) delete insufficient non-primary or secondary sources that provide the subject |significant coverage that suggest the subject meets . Alternatively, the article can be changed to a '''redirect''' to the article about General authority, such as this article List of general authorities of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, however until the subject can meet from non-secondary and non-primary sources, I believe this article falls under |too soon, and I wouldn't be opposed to the the creators |incubating the article until the time arises when there are sufficient tertiary sources to show independent notability Deletion of Adrián Ochoa WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON||WP:INCUBATE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2814 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of victims of the Virginia Tech massacre User:Ohconfucius 01:53, 21 April 2007 (UTC) merge Especially after 911, emotions are running high on any wanton act perpetrated on Americans. Whilst I would not expect to see lists of victims for each and every massacre, independent of scale, I believe that this list in this case fits the mood, notable as the event, but could exist within context of the article, worked in to either in Virginia Tech massacre or Virginia Tech massacre timeline. This is a list of 30-odd names, already part of Virginia_Tech_massacre#Victims|Virginia Tech massacre. A separate article would constitute a |memorial, and would be an invitation for people to start expanding the article beyond notable biographical details and into the trivial existence of individuals who would not have merited a listing if they had not been in the wrong place at the wrong time. Have a look at List of victims of the Virginia Tech massacre|the article again: with all the flags and descriptions of the courses the victims were on, it bears an increasing resemblance to memorials we are well accustomed to seeing Deletion of List of victims of the Virginia Tech massacre WP:MEMORIAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2815 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ski-Whoop User:Headwes 04:46, 16 January 2008 (UTC) delete This does not meet notability requirements Deletion of Ski-Whoop WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +2816 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Esk User:Gilliam 06:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC) delete per Bearcat. A clear case and this guy just had his 15 minutes of fame Deletion of Scott Esk WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +2817 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Baptist churches in Leicester User:Jerodlycett 19:44, 18 January 2020 (UTC) delete """per ''Notability of lists (whether titled as """"List of Xs"""" or """"Xs"""") is based on the group.'' and this group is not notable""" Deletion of List of Baptist churches in Leicester WP:LISTN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2818 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Future of the NHS User:BethNaught 06:58, 27 July 2014 (UTC) delete certainly not enough coverage in RS to satisfy the GNG. I have also failed to find evidence of passing , though a Gsearch is hard as the title is also a common phrase Deletion of The Future of the NHS WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2819 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kwame Larry Tay User:AllyD 07:05, 15 October 2019 (UTC) delete Awards to graduating students are not inherently notable. Neither the reporting of these awards nor the subject's subsequent job demonstrate |notability Deletion of Kwame Larry Tay :WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2820 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Hatch User:Smashville 20:42, 28 November 2007 (UTC) delete I've thought more about these. says that athletes are generally notable if they have played in the highest level of amateur sports. However, it also says meeting the guideline doesn't merit inclusion. Common sense would say a person who played 3 drives is not notable...and - there is a higher non-amateur level than college football. I believe the intention of the policy is to cover olympic athletes, not third string college football players Deletion of Andrew Hatch WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2821 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hickey Ranch User:Bearian 23:22, 13 November 2020 (UTC) delete per - it used to be a ranch Deletion of Hickey Ranch WP:MILL Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill 32 +2822 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GeoDaSilva User:Bdell555 11:36, 16 June 2008 (UTC) keep """I created this article because while I was travelling in the Balkans, this guy seemed to be all over the radio and in the clubs. He accordingly satisfied the necessary and sufficient condition #11 so I created the article, thinking the rest of the world could be informed. He's from Romania, not Belgrade or even Serbia, so the argument that this guy is just a Belgrade phenomenon doesn't make sense. His presence on a CD titled http://www.tulumba.com/storeItem.asp?ic=MU901312CE683 """"Number 1 Hits 2008"""" marketed by a Turkish label is evidence he's big in Istanbul as well (or hit #1 somewhere else than just Belgrade). Google """"Geo Da Silva"""" and count the hits. Anyway, reject if you will, but do so for relevant reasons. If one thinks sourcing could be different, that's an argument for editing or deleted what's sourced, not the whole article""" Deletion of GeoDaSilva WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2823 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of entertainers by nickname User:Bearian 18:26, 6 August 2007 (UTC) keep per above, but remove the nicknames of couples. |This is not a gossip rag Deletion of List of entertainers by nickname WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2824 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Herida User:GiantSnowman 17:08, 31 August 2009 (UTC) delete non-notable player who fails and Deletion of Mohamed Herida WP:ATHLETE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2825 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heisenberg's paradox User:Verdatum 20:34, 21 April 2008 (UTC) delete """The article is titled in such a way as to seem that there is a known named concept called """"Heisenberg's paradox"""", however, such does not appear to be the case. While I don't doubt that heisenberg has raised many paradoxical topics, naming it in this manner can be considered . The article reads like a school essay. Because the article does not have a proper lead section, I am unable to improve it's content (beyond wikifying, and fixes to spelling and grammar). The topic fails Notability, it does not make a strong effort to define it's scope. Even with serious improvements, I cannot see any way this fits into Wikipedia""" Deletion of Heisenberg's paradox WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2826 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Breakup Song User:Barkeep 14:23, 22 November 2010 (UTC) merge In addition to |general notability, fails SONG. Merge to album ''The Art of Losing Deletion of The Breakup Song WP:N||WP:NSONG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2827 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mukesh Sharma (businessman) User:Coderzombie 22:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC) delete Clearly fails Deletion of Mukesh Sharma (businessman) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2828 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knuth reward check User:Iowateen 16:17, 5 May 2009 (UTC) keep Passes Deletion of Knuth reward check WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2829 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of NSW FC User:Pharaoh 03:09, 27 July 2019 (UTC) keep """tq|""""Teams that have played in the national cup (or the national level of the league structure in countries where no cup exists) generally meet WP:GNG criteria"""" Teams that are not eligible for national cups must be shown to meet broader WP:N criteria }} as per .This club is eligible for national cup""" Deletion of University of NSW FC WP:FOOTYN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2830 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William J. Ecker User:Peacemaker67 05:29, 11 May 2014 (UTC) keep """Other than his rank (and which is a WikiProject Military History thing, not a WP-wide guideline), Ecker's """"notability"""" relates to appearing before a number of Congressional and Senate Committee hearings in relation to maritime safety, and he presented at least one paper on that subject at a major conference. He was Chief of the Office of Navigation Safety and Waterway Services for the USCG in the 1990's, not sure how important a role that is. This from the single page of Google Books hits. On that basis, his notability per is marginal at best IMO. His gongs don't help him, as his highest is apparently Officer of the Legion of Merit, which is pretty much passe for a US one-star. I consider the one-star bit of SOLDIER to be blurry at the bottom ranks, so a one-star without clear notability per GNG is questionable. I would AGF and think he's got newspaper coverage no-one's bothered to look for yet. Cheers""" Deletion of William J. Ecker WP:SOLDIER||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2831 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idwal Robling User:Favonian 12:00, 20 June 2011 (UTC) keep sufficient coverage for and having competed at the Olympics, he passes Deletion of Idwal Robling WP:GNG||WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2832 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promode channel User:Bobet 22:04, 11 December 2005 (UTC) delete 200 edits and no encyclopedic content, please read and note that wikipedia isn't a free webhost or an indiscriminate collection of information. If there's something that makes the channel notable in a wider context than beyond it's own community, please list it on the article Deletion of Promode channel WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2833 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Group 90 User:Dream 03:51, 13 September 2011 (UTC) keep Has done exhibitions at notable galleries. 4b has been met Deletion of Group 90 WP:ARTIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2834 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Einstein–Cartan–Evans theory User:Arxiloxos 23:45, 10 May 2013 (UTC) keep per Mathsci, and because |notability is not temporary Deletion of Einstein–Cartan–Evans theory WP:NTEMP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2835 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexia Koukotsikas User:Edison 15:01, 6 May 2011 (UTC) delete per .Also lacking demonstration of substantial coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources as required by . Also per OTNEWS, even if the politician's speech was echoed by the newspapers for a news cycle. Getting mentioned by a politician does not demonstrate notability. Known only for being displaced from one's home? Not notable Deletion of Alexia Koukotsikas WP:BLP1E||WP:N||WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +2836 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uneven User:Hzh 14:37, 3 August 2018 (UTC) delete """Apart from trivial listings, I can only find one brief mention in a book https://books.google.com/books?id=8ZwZcZ2X5ToC&pg=PA78, not enough to satisfy . A redirect is also possible, but the title is a common word and people searching for something """"uneven"""" is unlikely to be looking for the album, and it would only cause confusion when redirected to Sieges Even""" Deletion of Uneven WP:NALBUMS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2837 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ender Bowen User:Bridgeplayer 19:16, 15 June 2007 (UTC) delete whom? Notability comes from secondary sources and none of the articles have any. Fails Deletion of Ender Bowen WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2838 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antoniev Caves- Sacred place User:Oakshade 05:58, 26 September 2012 (UTC) keep """The writing might be """"silly"""", but it does appear to pass as there is significant coverage, in non-Ukrainian languages even. http://books.google.com/books?id=fgUV3ml_hsUC&pg=PT95&lpg=PT95&dq=%22%D0%90%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%96%D1%94%D0%B2%D1%96+%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B8%22&source=bl&ots=u0fTtlM7qa&sig=DIfDgJSLDBE_VFZcoDjPVyFHpVA&hl=en&sa=X&ei=2pZiUPrsBMzSigK14oDwDQ&ved=0CEEQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=%22%D0%90%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%96%D1%94%D0%B2%D1%96%20%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B8%22&f=false The http://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%96%D1%94%D0%B2%D1%96_%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B8_%28%D0%A7%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D1%96%D0%B3%D1%96%D0%B2%29 Ukrainian WP page appears to be much better written. (See g-translation http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=uk&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fuk.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F%25D0%2590%25D0%25BD%25D1%2582%25D0%25BE%25D0%25BD%25D1%2596%25D1%2594%25D0%25B2%25D1%2596_%25D0%25BF%25D0%25B5%25D1%2587%25D0%25B5%25D1%2580%25D0%25B8_%2528%25D0%25A7%25D0%25B5%25D1%2580%25D0%25BD%25D1%2596%25D0%25B3%25D1%2596%25D0%25B2%2529&act=url here""" Deletion of Antoniev Caves- Sacred place WP:NOTABILITY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2839 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HEWI London User:Cwmhiraeth 14:15, 18 November 2017 (UTC) keep The article should be rewritten to remove the puffery but I do think the subject is notable and meets . The references given include to articles in The Telegraph, Harpers Bazaar, Daily Mail and El Pais Deletion of HEWI London WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2840 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Mihaly User:Ethicoaestheticist 22:24, 3 April 2009 (UTC) keep The artist doesn't meet and I understand the concerns listed above. But he does meet , which sets a lower standard. He may not be a notable artist, but he's a notable subject for a WP article, which is a somewhat different thing Deletion of Robert Mihaly WP:CREATIVE||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2841 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Welsh Government COVID-19 press conference videos User:This 19:49, 15 December 2020 (UTC) delete as fails . If not already mentioned in something like COVID-19 pandemic in Wales then we can add a sentence or two about the videos being made available because of a request from Wikimedia UK, but these videos definitely shouldn't have their own standalone article Deletion of List of Welsh Government COVID-19 press conference videos WP:LISTN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2842 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adeel pk User:AllyD 09:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC) delete """Notability is and the available coverage is of the offspring-of-famous-parent-getting-started-in-the-trade tendency. As to the article text, it is encrusted with |promotion. Whether or not the subject is """"all set to engage audiences with his tricky cinematography and modern-day filmmaking techniques"""" that is text; as things stand, the subject meets none of the criteria, nor broader notability""" Deletion of Adeel pk :WP:NOTINHERITED||:WP:POV||:WP:CRYSTAL||:WP:FILMMAKER||:WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +2843 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CarProperty.com (2nd nomination) User:Kvng 22:02, 28 August 2020 (UTC) keep Easily clears new requirements Deletion of CarProperty.com (2nd nomination) WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2844 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodney Ascher User:Coredesat 20:26, 23 June 2006 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Rodney Ascher WP:BIO||WP:VAIN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2845 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikiIndex User:Piotrus 09:14, 31 May 2019 (UTC) delete No in-depth, independent, reliable coverage. Fails Deletion of WikiIndex WP:NORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2846 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seth Adkins User:Cwmhiraeth 11:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC) keep Meets having appeared in a number of films and television series including as a main character in the film Pirates of the Plain and the title role in When Andrew Came Home Deletion of Seth Adkins WP:ENTERTAINER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2847 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibraah (2nd nomination) User:JPxG 03:34, 13 May 2021 (UTC) delete """Ibraah Biography, Age, Education, Album, Songs, Girlfriend, Net Worth"""" and """"Ibraah Biography, Age, Education, Album, Songs, Girlfriend, Net Worth"""" (yes, two refs with that same title) are not usable sources. The majority of these are download pages for the album. The https://www.cyclonetimes.com/harmonize-signs-first-artist-under-his-label-konde-music-worldwide/ Cyclone Times article is a passing mention of him quoted in an Instagram post. The only thing that seems like it even comes close to is https://www.capitalfm.co.ke/thesauce/harmonize-gives-diamond-platnumz-a-run-for-his-money-with-a-new-artist/ this one, but it seems fairly questionable in terms of being an independent RS""" Deletion of Ibraah (2nd nomination) WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2848 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Gold (music executive) User:The 10:30, 28 May 2019 (UTC) delete since subject fails Deletion of Roger Gold (music executive) WP:NCREATIVE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2849 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business planning User:Hetar 07:08, 16 April 2006 (UTC) delete seems like |OR. If the Method Engineering team wants to publish their work online, perhaps they should look into Wikibooks or Wikiversity Deletion of Business planning WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2850 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Winner Ozelis User:B 03:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC) delete per nom. Wikipedia is not a memorial, and thousands of people are medical test subjects every day (this takes care of ). My sympathies, but no Deletion of Elizabeth Winner Ozelis WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2851 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siopepa Tailolo User:Kosm1fent 19:32, 17 October 2012 (UTC) delete hasn't actually played for his country's national team. Fails and . &ndash Deletion of Siopepa Tailolo WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2852 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jubilee Hospital Radio User:Anthony 01:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC) delete However worthy the project, it fails on . I do not see the attack claimed by the above editor Deletion of Jubilee Hospital Radio WP:NN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2853 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donnegy Fer User:Fenix 13:36, 29 March 2017 (UTC) delete Fails |NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a |fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy |GNG Deletion of Donnegy Fer WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2854 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republican Party vice presidential candidate selection, 2012 User:Ddcm8991 18:37, 3 November 2013 (UTC) keep per rationale of LtNOWIS above. Obviously satisfies Deletion of Republican Party vice presidential candidate selection, 2012 WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2855 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulgaria–Sudan relations User:WilyD 16:01, 20 April 2009 (UTC) keep easily exceeds the standard set by , and I see no reason this article needs a higher irregular treatment. See http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_multi=BBAB&d_place=BBAB&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0F9782D778E3D9B9&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePMhttp://news.google.com/newspapers?id=uvENAAAAIBAJ&sjid=3XUDAAAAIBAJ&pg=3001,2351934&dq=bulgaria+sudan+relationshttp://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F30812F8395C1A7493C1A91783D85F458785F9http://www.sofiaecho.com/article/diplomatic-dispatches-the-sudanese-ambassador-discusses-relations-between-bulgaria-and-the-largest-country-in-africa/id_7327/catid_30http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=27164http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F50B16F83F591A728DDDA90B94D8415B818AF1D3http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_multi=BBAB&d_place=BBAB&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0F9782CC2FC9E496&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePMhttp://www.sofiaecho.com/article/economy-briefs/id_10898/catid_23http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F20E17F8395C1A7493C0A91783D85F458785F9 Deletion of Bulgaria–Sudan relations WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2856 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apurva Chamaria User:Bearian 14:51, 12 August 2016 (UTC) delete per , , , and . The subject lacks |significant coverage in multiple sources, which is |required of all BLPs. All business VPs post on LinkedIn and try to get published in an ''economist''-type magazine, especially marketing mavens like the subject. We are not a place to post this person's resume, which is more of what this is than a real article. He's up-and-coming like lots of people in business; when he actually makes it big, we can re-create an article for him Deletion of Apurva Chamaria WP:GNG||WP:MILL||WP:NOTRESUME||WP:UPANDCOMING||WP:SIGCOV||WP:BLP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2857 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Heenan User:GiantSnowman 21:22, 7 October 2009 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Sam Heenan WP:ATHLETE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2858 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Statutory Instruments of Scotland, 2012 User:Cynical 00:47, 20 October 2013 (UTC) delete It's merely a reproduction of a list available in primary sources - there's no value in duplicating it on Wikipedia when the vast, vast majority of the entries on the list are redlinks or nonlinks with no prospect of ever having enough secondary sources avaiable to become viable articles Deletion of List of Statutory Instruments of Scotland, 2012 WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2859 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MissbrauchsOpfer Gegen InternetSperren User:SoWhy 19:27, 25 November 2009 (UTC) keep """WP:NOTDE|This project is not the German Wikipedia. We have different guidelines and policies to apply and things that are not notable enough for inclusion in the German Wikipedia can and are included on this project. If you claim that it does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies), please use an argument that does not consist of either """"not notable for de.wikipedia"""" or """"|just not notable"""". The article lists half a dozen sources explicitly talking about the subject and crediting them with having a major impact on the movement against internet censorship in Germany, which imho meets the requirement of our notability guidelines. And of course the aforementioned deletion on de.wikipedia added quite a bit of coverage that also referenced the subject multiple times. Regards""" Deletion of MissbrauchsOpfer Gegen InternetSperren WP:JNN Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +2860 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2004 United States presidential election controversy and irregularities User:Protonk 17:49, 21 April 2008 (UTC) comment """Part of the problem here is that the subject is really, REALLY personal for people. This is akin to editing the Abortion article. People believe very strongly that the 2004 election was hijacked by Bush et. al. Consequently they try very hard to find sourced that agree with that feeling. That is a problem, because it (obviously) violates POV, but it also leads to a shortage of sources in these articles. Most academics aren't going to stick their necks out and suggest that Diebold delivered the 2004 elections to the republicans because that's not the kind of people they are. They didn't get to be academics by making bold claims when the evidence didn't support it. they got to be academics by amounting masses of evidence for tentative claims on limited subject areas. Consequently, the academic research is going to be mixed. However, that doesn't mean that there aren't other sources--reliable publications, films, and other non-academic sources--to be mined. We are kind of stuck between people who didn't think that bush stole the election (and who consequently will label people who do as ) and people for whom the theft is glaringly obvious. I don't think Phil is nominating these articles in bad faith. there isn't any evidence to suggest that and no real motive--for that matter he has behaved exceedingly well in the face of accusations. However, I don't share his view of the articles themselves and I think his words on the subject are instructive. Consider the Estate_tax_in_the_United_States|Estate Tax. Editors who add the """"arguments against"""" section without the same demand for rigor as the rest of the article are ''shocked'' that the section is tagged for being unverified. surely it is common knowledge that the estate tax is morally wrong, impacts farmers, etc. One needs to only provide a hint out sources for these claims, just like the population of a town is sourced. for them, the proposition is uncontroversial. for people who think the debate over the estate tax is a republican canard, just the opposite is true. None of this means that either side is wrong. It means that we are going to have a rough time coming to consensus, but it isn't hopeless""" Deletion of 2004 United States presidential election controversy and irregularities WP:FRINGE Wikipedia:Fringe theories 44 +2861 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesus the True Vine Christian Fellowship User:RadioFan 20:20, 18 March 2010 (UTC) delete Fails , no indication of how it might be notable Deletion of Jesus the True Vine Christian Fellowship WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2862 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis Hart User:Col_tom 00:40, 26 April 2006 (UTC) keep albeit in a drastically cut down fashion. Way too much unnecessary info in here, but the list of publications does suggest that it meets or comes close to the |professor test there. The listed awards fail the test, tho, IMO Deletion of Dennis Hart WP:PROFTEST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2863 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Jayne Defoe User:JulesH 18:12, 28 May 2012 (UTC) delete Major role in one notable film. Appeared in a notable theatre production, but was not mentioned by name in reviews of it. Article may be worth creating in a few years, when she's likely to have acquired a more noteworthy portfolio, but at this point in time she does not meet or Deletion of Alexis Jayne Defoe WP:ARTIST||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2864 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulsatile flow generator User:Mangoe 14:55, 30 August 2017 (UTC) delete per As the nom says, this is a general class of devices (the feds say so), and what we have here is an article hawking one particular design. I'm not even sure the thing is notable on its own, but at any rate the current article is hopelessly promotional Deletion of Pulsatile flow generator WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +2865 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 County Down helicopter crash User:Chris 20:20, 24 October 2010 (UTC) comment The level of notability used for air accidents seems to be a bit random. All of these have third-party media coverage, but I can't see a clear pattern for that does and doesn't fail . I don't want to go down the route of , but would it beneficial to have a proper discussion of how much coverage we expect for an air accident to be considered notable Deletion of 2010 County Down helicopter crash WP:NOTNEWS||WP:OTHERSTUFF Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2866 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Wilbur User:Walter 00:32, 8 September 2018 (UTC) delete Fails and there is no music bio to support the subject's claim to notability, but again, no sources recognize the subject and so we do not need to either Deletion of Josh Wilbur :WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2867 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willene Johnson User:Pilean 07:14, 23 March 2021 (UTC) keep Meets criteria #6 Deletion of Willene Johnson WP:NACADEMIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2868 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castle Adventure User:Someone 13:05, 28 June 2008 (UTC) delete Lacks significant coverage in the multiple reliable sources needed to demonstrate |notability and provide the materials to write an encyclopedia article. Home of the Underdogs is a ''very'' weak source, being an abandonware site, yet is the best of all the mentions I can find. None of the above sources are appropriate for referencing or providing reliable material. The only GameSpy reference I've found so far is http://ascii.classicgaming.gamespy.com/featgame_files/castle/castle.html this, which is not GameSpy, it's a personal website hosted on the classic gaming network. Games of historical importance are covered in the multitude of books published about videogames, meaning they'd never be permastubs and notability would be demonstrable. I'd be happy to switch to keep if some of these abundant reliable sources which supposedly exist are demonstrated Deletion of Castle Adventure WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2869 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony De Ieso User:Coredesat 08:56, 26 June 2006 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Anthony De Ieso WP:HOAX Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes 40 +2870 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bellevue Death Squad User:Nicklocarno 22:24, 7 April 2006 (UTC) delete tl|db-band}} candidates, usic violation, as noted by Deletion of Bellevue Death Squad WP:M Wikipedia:Mediation 70 +2871 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Abel User:E 12:55, 25 November 2018 (UTC) delete """as PROMO for a non-notable """"content strategist, conference organizer and author"""" who has published two books with XML Press. He appears to be successful in business https://www.cmswire.com/content-marketing/ubm-acquires-content-marketing-institute-for-176m/. Fails , """ Deletion of Scott Abel WP:ANYBIO||WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2872 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renegade1116 User:Wildthing61476 16:03, 29 September 2006 (UTC) delete I originally marked this for speedy deletion. How is this individual, who is not-notable to begin with, become any more notable with this gaming character? After reviewing this article, I believe this also violates Deletion of Renegade1116 WP:VANITY Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +2873 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foxit User:OlYeller21 05:12, 7 January 2014 (UTC) keep """Satisfies with these articles that represent significant coverage from independent and seemingly reliable sources (if someone wants to call them not-reliable, they'll need to back that up): http://www.neowin.net/news/foxit-reader-6121224http://www.techcentral.ie/foxit-reader-portable-6-1-2/http://soft.zol.com.cn/409/4099993.htmlhttp://news.sina.com.tw/article/20131227/11454422.html. """"No indication of notability"""" isn't a reason for deletion at which has been clearly explained at rguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Simply doing a https://www.google.com/search?q=Foxit&safe=off&espv=210&es_sm=93&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ei=FYvLUtiVDaKc2QXY7ID4Cw&ved=0CA0Q_AUoAA&biw=1920&bih=964 Google News search for Foxit produced all of these articles. Maybe these references can be disputed when it comes to establishing notability but did any delete !votes even check before !voting? These were as easy to find as it comes. If you found no references, it helps the discussion to show what searches you did that resulted in no references. Otherwise, your !vote is baseless and not very useful""" Deletion of Foxit WP:GNG||WP:AFD||WP:A Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2874 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heritage Guitars User:Nick 17:22, 7 January 2007 (UTC) comment """I think you're setting the bar pretty high for notability. otability states that """"a topic is notable if it has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, reliable published works, whose sources are independent of the subject itself."""" The two books now cited provide such coverage of the company. That the books are not ''entirely'' dedicated to covering the company does not make the coverage trivial. The coverage is more than a mention--the Bacon book provides several historical details about the company's founding, while the Freeth & Alexander book dedicates a two-page spread to the company. I don't see how it is a mark against notability that the company is mentioned in books about guitars. What better place to find information about a guitar-making company than in a book about guitars? I am certain that coverage of the company can be found in well-established music or guitar magazines, but do not have access to such. I have made a request of WikiProject Guitarists to find such coverage. In the meantime, I think that the two book sources provide sufficient reason to keep the article""" Deletion of Heritage Guitars WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2875 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Cass User:Kierzek 15:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC) delete per nom. Does not meet and not notable for stand alone article Deletion of Jonathan Cass WP:SOLDIER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2876 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koohiar Peik User:Jmertel23 20:26, 19 November 2018 (UTC) delete pure |self-promotion that has no in-depth or |reliable sources. Simply fails notability guidelines Deletion of Koohiar Peik WP:SPIP||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2877 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanklet User:Richwales 03:51, 11 August 2011 (UTC) delete per (no sources ''at all'', and I couldn't find anything relevant in a Google search); (can't verify without any sources); (no sources at all, thus no independent sources to substantiate notability); and (the article is written like an advertisement Deletion of Tanklet WP:RS||WP:V||WP:INDY||WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2878 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soyombo Revival Society [[User talk:24.151.50.175|talk]]) 15:33, 20 January 2020 (UTC) delete Fails as best I can determine. Special:Contributions/24.151.50.175|24.151.50.175 Deletion of Soyombo Revival Society WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2879 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One97 Communications (3rd nomination) User:AusLondonder 02:39, 16 September 2015 (UTC) comment This is a pretty serious case of . This is a fairly large Indian company, with thousands of employees, millions in turnover and significant coverage in reliable sources such as the daily Indian business newspaper The Economic Times. I ask all delete-voters here, would they nominate an American company in similar circumstances? With Wall Street Journal coverage? Absolutely shameful. The paid editing aspect is irrelevant, frankly. Clean it up if that is the concern Deletion of One97 Communications (3rd nomination) WP:GEOBIAS Wikipedia:Systemic bias 83 +2880 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Wars Chronicles (SW: JKA) [[User talk:72.64.62.51|talk]]) 01:55, 12 November 2007 (UTC) keep Well you know turkish, french, spanish wikipedia accept mods, i tought why not english, even though wikipedia is not trying to be like google this info doesnt hurt anyone, and main reaseon i put this here was to help people, i didnt put it just to have fun,... I really think it is peoples right to put in any appropirate info here. read this if you said delete '''Tukish, spanish, french, and some other languages accept this kind of content''' since wikipedia is one company even though it has diffrent moderators for diffrent languages english should accept too. so if you delete this article you have to delete every single mod or add-on or any kind of games realted expansions from all languages of wikipedia. If you delete this it is my right to ask to have more than 1000 articles deleted from wikipedia.. —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/72.64.62.51|72.64.62.51 Deletion of Star Wars Chronicles (SW: JKA) WP:ALLORNOTHING Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +2881 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles H. Thompson (Wisconsin) User:Royalbroil 03:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC) keep Wisconsin Department of Transportation is a major cabinet-level statewide office http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/112671249.html - NOT obscure. Easily passes point #1. I don't understand how this is being discussed. And per unanimous keeps at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles H. Thompson (besides the same nominator Deletion of Charles H. Thompson (Wisconsin) WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2882 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P.K. Firos User:onel5969 01:28, 16 April 2021 (UTC) delete what a mess. {{u|Bearcat}}'s assessment is spot on. Kudos also to {{u|DoubleGrazing}} to making me smile. And more kudos to {{u|Beccaynr}} for their source assessment. Fails and Deletion of P.K. Firos WP:GNG||WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2883 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Panda Candies User:MER 07:36, 1 December 2006 (UTC) delete http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22The+Panda+Candies%22+-myspace&btnG=Search 11 ghits outside of myspace. Fails Deletion of The Panda Candies WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2884 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liu Zhe User:Thomas 18:25, 14 November 2017 (UTC) comment """It's interesting to see that everyone who has !voted """"keep"""" here seems to feel that an '''essay''' on ''WikiProject:Military History'' (claiming that it says that all one to four star generals/admirals, past ''and'' present, around the world, no matter what their job is, are notable enough to have a stand-alone article) carries more weight than a Wikipedia guideline (; since the subject fails , unless someone proficient in Chinese can come up with something better than the pressreleases in the article...). Especially since the essay in question is on a project about military ''history'', refers to people in the past tense (was awarded, held a rank, served as, etc), and makes no mention whatsoever about it also applying to modern day military """"civil servants"""", i.e. one star generals/admirals who have held no higher offices and have no meritorius service in wars to list in their CVs. - '''Tom''' | """ Deletion of Liu Zhe WP:N||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2885 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monster (book) User:Rtyq2 22:07, 14 December 2008 (UTC) merge to Monster (1999 novel). It seems that's what it redirected to before, until suddenly 2 years later http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Nubile_Servant this editor changes it. Definitely fails (http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_b?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Allan+Hall+-+Monster&x=0&y=0 obviously Deletion of Monster (book) WP:BK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2886 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Catholic leaders and politicians User:Useight 17:59, 24 July 2007 (UTC) delete as violation of #LINK and, I agree, this should be done via category, because it's kind of an intersection between two unrelated topics Deletion of List of Catholic leaders and politicians WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2887 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mojiganga (band) User:Bearian 22:18, 18 October 2019 (UTC) keep per Deletion of Mojiganga (band) WP:HEY Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard 85 +2888 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Gamble (socialite) User:MER 15:26, 27 July 2019 (UTC) delete as a opyright violations#Addressing contributors|presumptive copyright violation; the author was blocked for an extensive history of copyright infringement Deletion of Patrick Gamble (socialite) WP:C Wikipedia:Copyrights 60 +2889 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul LaViolette (3rd nomination) User:Radagast3 08:38, 12 August 2010 (UTC) delete for the reasons in the previous AfD, and because this is an inadequately sourced Deletion of Paul LaViolette (3rd nomination) WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +2890 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Welch (2nd nomination) User:Umbralcorax 22:37, 9 May 2011 (UTC) merge to the appropriate list. Assuming that she doesn't meet the that is. As a former playboy playmate, her name is a plausible search term, and having a redlink for such an obviously plausible search term is unacceptable Deletion of Lisa Welch (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2891 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Tea Party politicians User:Colapeninsula 16:09, 17 May 2012 (UTC) comment The only valid criteria I can think of is to restrict it to people who self-identify as Tea Party members/supporters (although people may change their minds, which will give problems). There's a lot of non-notable people there; says lists should be lists of links to articles, not just lists of people who wouldn't merit WP articles on their own Deletion of List of Tea Party politicians WP:L Wikipedia:Lists 36 +2892 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Schwager User:Shirahadasha 09:42, 3 January 2007 (UTC) comment This article doesn't have any sources meeting at all, so as things stand vote would have to be '''Delete'''. If you have sources establishing Schwager's |notability etc., perhaps you could add them and this could be reconsidered Deletion of Rob Schwager WP:RS||WP:N Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2893 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurinder Seagal User:Pharaoh 02:22, 24 September 2014 (UTC) delete As per nom and fails Deletion of Gurinder Seagal WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2894 """Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of """"Occupy"""" protest locations""" User:Northamerica1000 05:58, 16 October 2011 (UTC) keep A functional, useful directory and list. Also passes : numerous references """Deletion of List of """"Occupy"""" protest locations""" WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2895 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daryl Wine Bar and Restaurant (2nd nomination) User:Griswaldo 19:23, 3 February 2011 (UTC) delete """As I stated in the first AfD, this business does not satisfy . It is an unremarkable restaurant with average level attention, and it now isn't even open for business. While there are a handful restaurant reviews in ''regional'' publications, this does not amount to """"regional"""" level coverage in my book. Do not get tricked into thinking that the ''New York Times'' review was """"national"""" level, by the way. It appeared only in the ''regional'' section of the paper. There is no evidence that it had national or international distribution. One of the problems with the first AfD stemmed from the fact that people equated regional/local restaurant reviews with """"significant coverage"""". Restaurant reviews are not like normal news coverage, they are part of a PR game played by restaurants""" Deletion of Daryl Wine Bar and Restaurant (2nd nomination) WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2896 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States Capitol shooting incident (2013) (2nd nomination) User:SteveStrummer 20:30, 5 December 2013 (UTC) keep """Two whole! months have passed without lasting effect"""" is humorously circular reasoning, but saying that it's an event that's """"only notable the day it happened"""" is empirically false: anyone can http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&authuser=0&q=%22Miriam+Carey search the news for """"Miriam Carey"""" and find |continuous, |in-depth coverage by |diverse sources for virtually every single day up to the present""" Deletion of United States Capitol shooting incident (2013) (2nd nomination) WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE||WP:INDEPTH||WP:DIVERSE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2897 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Financial (2nd nomination) User:Cocytus 01:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC) delete fails . The fact that a spam campaign seems to be involved doesn't help; the fact that this same article (more or less) has not survived past AfDs doesn't help. I suggest salting this for now, as it appears as though those involved in the spam campaign are recreating these types of articles repeatedly Deletion of One Financial (2nd nomination) WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2898 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariana Huerta User:Noq 16:35, 20 December 2016 (UTC) delete """I originally proded it with the foloowing rationale: No indication of meeting |notability guidelines. IMDb shows as appearing in 3 shorts - 2 of which have not been released. The """"nomination"""" for best actress is from a non notable festival that issues monthly lists of winners and is for something that does not even make IMDb""" Deletion of Mariana Huerta WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2899 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahvaz National Resistance User:Redditaddict69 23:40, 26 September 2018 (UTC) keep Passes w/ coverage in several sources (many not cited, just do a quick google search). Even BBC covered this... it's notable Deletion of Ahvaz National Resistance WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2900 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vera Baker User:David 02:32, 2 May 2010 (UTC) delete Per , badly sourced scandal-mongering needs to stay off this article, but without that what do we have? An article in Politico with a paragraph about her consulting firm (not actually about her personally), another reliably published article that mentions her only trivially, and a purported screenshot of uncertain provenance showing her bio from her consulting web site. That's not good enough, and the present situation makes it very difficult to make any improvements Deletion of Vera Baker WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +2901 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lightsaber combat (4th nomination) User:RGTraynor 20:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC) delete as above, violates and is little but a heap of supposition and personal opinion Deletion of Lightsaber combat (4th nomination) WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2902 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ma-Haw-Tha-Dha User:GO 19:40, 25 June 2008 (UTC) delete as nonsense. http://www.excite.com Excite search has more than two results, but none of them appear to mention anything similar to what this article contains. and #G1 both come into play here Deletion of Ma-Haw-Tha-Dha WP:HOAX||WP:CSD Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes 40 +2903 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Center for CosMedic Rejuvenation and Wellness User:SM247 01:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC) delete unless it is of particular historical or other significance, it doesn't merit its own page. I would also recommend to the nominator a similar page, Paradise Day Spa and Bath House, which is essentially an ad despite its opening by the Mayor and assertions of historical importance. The problem is that there is simply nothing notable about this particular center which would merit inclusion in an encyclopaedia - see and if you are not quite familiar with policies. Maybe it will be significant one day, or maybe it is and needs to be rewritten to assert what it is that makes it so. But for now, it doesn't belong here Deletion of The Center for CosMedic Rejuvenation and Wellness WP:NOT||WP:CORP Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2904 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professor Shekhar Osmania University User:Nipsonanomhmata 10:30, 18 May 2011 (UTC) delete promo of individual. No attempt has been made to show why individual meets or Deletion of Professor Shekhar Osmania University WP:GNG||WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2905 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spanish profanity (3rd nomination) User:Mike 01:39, 13 November 2011 (UTC) comment Nom provides no valid el#Reason|rationale for deletion. Why should this article be deleted Deletion of Spanish profanity (3rd nomination) WP:D Wikipedia:Disambiguation 64 +2906 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Actaeon Films User:Tree 09:59, 30 June 2006 (UTC) delete per and . Only 494 Google results http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Actaeon+Films%22 Deletion of Actaeon Films WP:CORP||WP:ADS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2907 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fotolia (2nd nomination) User:SamHolt6 15:54, 8 September 2017 (UTC) delete fails and is probably in violation of . Per nom, poorly sourced Deletion of Fotolia (2nd nomination) WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:PROMO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2908 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Griggs User:Ohnoitsjamie 13:55, 15 April 2016 (UTC) delete No games played in the majors, no evidence otherwise of notability Deletion of Scott Griggs WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2909 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Choi Kyu-Hwan User:GiantSnowman 14:35, 8 September 2009 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Choi Kyu-Hwan WP:ATHLETE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2910 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tishting User:Blue520 15:24, 5 May 2006 (UTC) delete seems to be a neologism , also unverifiable Deletion of Tishting WP:NEO||WP:V Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +2911 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy Leach User:DonCalo 11:46, 1 July 2012 (UTC) delete Does not meet and Deletion of Randy Leach WP:CRIME||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2912 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthropedia Foundation User:WhatamIdoing 19:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC) comment """All of the """"keep votes"""" come from brand-new accounts and unregistered IP addresses, and since accounts are free on Wikipedia, this naturally will make some people wonder whether all of these comments might be |from the same person. It also suggests that the """"keep"""" supporters are probably unfamiliar with Wikipedia's process for deleting articles. Since this is '''not a majority vote''', I'd like to clarify for our new editors (welcome!) that what we need for an article on an organization is a ''bona fide'' independent, third-party publication (e.g., a story in a major newspaper or magazine) that is ''about'' the specific organization. Note that an article ''about'' the organization is different from an article that merely ''happens to mention'' the organization, or that is about a single person or member of the organization. One detailed profile in a major media outlet trumps all """"delete"""" comments""" Deletion of Anthropedia Foundation WP:SOCK Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry 80 +2913 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaif Raza Khan Qadri User:Samee 14:50, 27 February 2018 (UTC) delete non-notable. Notability isn't |inherited, there is only one sentence about the subject, others are about his great-grandfather and uncle Deletion of Kaif Raza Khan Qadri WP:INHERITED Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +2914 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Williams (businessman) User:Pharaoh 08:18, 16 April 2015 (UTC) delete per nom and fails Deletion of Ryan Williams (businessman) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2915 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C.B. Robinson Bridge User:Cewbot 00:03, 22 October 2020 (UTC) comment While this discussion appears to have |no quorum, it is '''NOT eligible for |soft deletion''' because it has been Special:Diff/983564417|previously PROD'd (via summary Deletion of C.B. Robinson Bridge WP:NOQUORUM||WP:SOFTDELETE Wikipedia:Deletion process 72 +2916 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominique Piek User:Hrafn 11:02, 6 December 2010 (UTC) delete what little coverage there is seems to be thoroughly Deletion of Dominique Piek WP:TABLOID Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2917 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Handjob User:Caknuck 01:24, 3 January 2007 (UTC) keep Usage is too widespread to use as justification for deletion Deletion of Handjob WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +2918 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/System Crash (TV series) (2nd nomination) User:Davey2010 21:05, 10 May 2020 (UTC) keep per Bearcat, Even tho I wasn't around pre-2010 even I know Wikipedia was ''very'' different then to what it is now, Bearcat has since improved and although it could do with more work . Sourcing the article is fine and imho meets GNG Deletion of System Crash (TV series) (2nd nomination) WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +2919 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefanie Rabatsch User:Smmurphy 18:18, 17 January 2017 (UTC) comment """my feeling is that the importance of Rabatsch was not based on the real person, but on Hitler's ideal of her. In fact, many sources do not give a last name, only calling her Stefanie. However, """"Stefanie"""" has, in my opinion, been the subject of many in depth analyses. I've added a short section to the article discussing these analyses based on Zalampas' discussion of the research, citing, in addition to Zalampas, Werner Maser, Robert G. L. Waite, Bradley F. Smith, and Franz Jetzinger, all very notable Hitler biographers (note, I did not find Smith's work, and only cite it as being cited by Zalampas based on |say where you got it).https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stefanie_Rabatsch&type=revision&diff=760549930&oldid=760144592""" Deletion of Stefanie Rabatsch WP:SWYGT Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2920 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William B. Roberts User:Eric 18:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC) delete Pass neither nor . In addition to the points made by Yobmod, independent news coverage http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22William+B+Roberts%22+composer seems to be nonexistent Deletion of William B. Roberts WP:PROF||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2921 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prabhakar Thokal User:KylieTastic 16:15, 19 December 2020 (UTC) delete no indication passes / Deletion of Prabhakar Thokal WP:BIO||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2922 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reactions to the 2016 Orlando nightclub shooting User:Smartyllama 17:38, 15 June 2016 (UTC) keep Merge isn't feasible due to the large amount of content, and there is significant precedent for having articles of this nature. It's an event of significant magnitude. And stop with the editing SI mentioned above. If the article needs improving, improve it. Don't willfully stop improvement so it can fulfill your goal of deletion. In any event, |AFD is not cleanup so if the article has potential, which it does, it should stay Deletion of Reactions to the 2016 Orlando nightclub shooting WP:POINT||WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +2923 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AVN Award for All-Girl Performer of the Year User:SSTflyer 08:11, 11 September 2016 (UTC) merge to AVN Award, per Deletion of AVN Award for All-Girl Performer of the Year WP:PRESERVE Wikipedia:Editing policy 24 +2924 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Vladimir Putin User:DonaldDuck 04:28, 30 December 2008 (UTC) delete as Deletion of Criticism of Vladimir Putin WP:POVFORK Wikipedia:Content forking 33 +2925 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Reed User:Bagumba 09:19, 19 July 2011 (UTC) delete """Does not meet for college athletes, and never played at highest level professionally. Source from The Daily Californian is a school newspaper and not an |independent source as required by . says """"Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability"""", but the sources are from MediaNews Group which syndicate each others articles (San Jose Mercury News, Oakland Tribune, Las Cruces Sun-News). A lot of the sources listed were available subscription only, so cited results from does not weed out articles that might be coverage even though the limited headline and excerpt seems promising. I personally can't verify it. This player generated some news because he decided to transfer schools within the Bay Area and happens to be a quarterback who played against Nebraska, so """"keep"""" proponents can have a field day citing sources from the state of Nebraska. But WP is . I'm at a loss as to what would ever be """"interesting or notable"""" in even the most polished |lead section for this article. Perhaps someone can provide some talking points to change my mind on why this person should not be considered un-of-the-mill and is deserving of an article""" Deletion of Kyle Reed WP:NSPORT||WP:IS||WP:GNG||WP:GOOGLEHITS||WP:ROUTINE||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:LEAD||WP:R Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2926 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled eighth-generation Codemasters Formula One project [[User talk:69.166.78.85|talk]]) 17:31, 1 October 2014 (UTC) delete as per Special:Contributions/69.166.78.85|69.166.78.85 Deletion of Untitled eighth-generation Codemasters Formula One project WP:HAMMER Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law 11 +2927 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/December 2018 Venezuela earthquakes User:FOARP 12:41, 14 May 2019 (UTC) delete Whilst the event received substantial coverage at the time of the quakes, there is no evidence of impact, and as such this fails Deletion of December 2018 Venezuela earthquakes WP:LASTING||WP:EVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2928 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Wynne Webber User:Astrophobe 21:28, 16 March 2020 (UTC) keep The article demonstrates consistent local coverage across three provinces and at least half a dozen cities, accompanied by a series of local awards, and some recognition by national organisations. Independent coverage includes local papers, arts councils, awards committees, and university presses. Some of the sources are even news articles solely focused on the article subject or her work, which goes above the minimum and requirements; in my opinion the strongest of these are the https://www.nanaimobulletin.com/entertainment/nanaimo-playwright-presents-staged-reading-of-newest-play-at-port-theatre/ Nanaimo Bulletin and https://saskatoonexpress.com/2019/04/16/play-highlights-womens-contributions-to-labour-movement/ Saskatoon Express articles. Now that these improvements have been made to the page, it seems clear that article does not fail Deletion of Jennifer Wynne Webber WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:NBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2929 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On My Knees: The Best of Jaci Velasquez (album) User:John 20:39, 30 October 2019 (UTC) delete There are no suitable sources; other than e-commerce sites and AllMusic/Discogs, all I can find with a Google Search is https://www.jesusfreakhideout.com/cdreviews/OnMyKneesTheBestOfJaciVelasquez.asp this, which appears to be slighly |BLPSPS. Also, even if we take Dodger67's comment at face value, such a reduction in notability is temporary; this came out in 2006, and having not achieved notability in the intervening 13 years means that it probably wouldn't do so anytime soon. &ndash Deletion of On My Knees: The Best of Jaci Velasquez (album) WP:BLPSPS Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +2930 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adytum (band) User:Titoxd 00:57, 3 May 2006 (UTC) delete fails , Deletion of Adytum (band) WP:BAND||WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2931 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vix from VixPix User:Brewcrewer 01:54, 13 December 2007 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Vix from VixPix WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2932 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Red Riding Hood (Disney) User:MichaelQSchmidt 06:35, 6 April 2010 (UTC) keep of a film that easily meets through its significance to cinematic history, and it still being written of nearly 90 years after its release for its historical context to the film industry, Walt Disney, Rudolf Ising, and early silent animation. |Notable since 1922 is still notable in 2010. And to the nom... and with respects... sourcing was quite easy to find in both http://books.google.com/books?ei=CLK6S-08iuz1BJemuO0H&ct=result&q=%22Little+Red+Riding+Hood%22+Disney&btnG=Search+Books books and http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&tbo=p&tbs=nws%3A1&q=%22Little+Red+Riding+Hood%22%2C+Disney&btnG=Search&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai= news Deletion of Little Red Riding Hood (Disney) WP:NF||WP:NOTTEMP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2933 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of British Jewish entertainers [[User talk:Bulldog123|Bulldog123]] 09:09, 5 December 2010 (UTC) delete """Pretty much for the same exact reasons stated in the AfD for List of Jewish American entertainers ...with one thing to add. The """"British Jewish"""" connection seems much more synthesized than the """"Jewish American"""" one. Jewish American is well-defined -- a distinct ethnic & cultural group that many consider themselves part of. British Jews appears to be drafted on a minimal amount of sources and a lot of |OR - making the """"entertainer"""" intersection even worse""" Deletion of List of British Jewish entertainers WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2934 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Parthasarathy Rajagopal Chari User:Ultraexactzz 17:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC) delete I'm forced to agree that the article has violations severe enough to warrant deletion. No objection to the recreation of a properly sourced, neutral article that avoids such problems Deletion of Sri Parthasarathy Rajagopal Chari WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +2935 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hon-Atsugi Station User:Dekimasu 13:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC) keep per regarding relative notability of train stations in various locations as noted by Deletion of Hon-Atsugi Station WP:BIAS Wikipedia:Systemic bias 83 +2936 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanner Price User:Paulmcdonald 06:16, 15 January 2019 (UTC) keep several of the sources provided by Yankees10 are feature articles from major news outlets, which is more than enough to pass . Not every college football athlete attains notability, but this one does Deletion of Tanner Price WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2937 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heartlight (song) User:Richhoncho 13:26, 28 June 2009 (UTC) keep per . Whereas I have great sympathy for deleting articles with poor/no references or mostly trivia it's not the WP way Deletion of Heartlight (song) WP:NSONGS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2938 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaye Mortualia User:Starblind 15:25, 29 February 2008 (UTC) delete per . All bands mentioned are redlinks, no reliable sources. http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Jaye+Mortualia%22&hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&hs=cmR&start=20&sa=N 17 Google hits, mostly Myspace and similar Deletion of Jaye Mortualia WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2939 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of properties of Hilton Worldwide User:Aausterm 18:34, 1 April 2021 (UTC) comment This violates the simple listings part of the as it just provides a listing of locations. Most of them are non notable and the notable ones are already covered by the :Category:Hilton Hotels & Resorts hotels. If this page is to be kept, it will need to be changed Deletion of List of properties of Hilton Worldwide WP:NOTDIR Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2940 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newport University (California) User:Shimeru 23:42, 12 November 2006 (UTC) delete per Fram and . I believe this one is noteworthy, but that's no good if we can't verify through independent sources, and it seems as if we can't Deletion of Newport University (California) WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2941 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinematic immersion User:Frank 02:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC) delete I declined the CSD because it wasn't an obvious candidate, but...while there was some |notability asserted, it isn't actually |supported by |reliable sources Deletion of Cinematic immersion WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2942 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramon Estevez User:Gtstricky 13:42, 2 July 2010 (UTC) merge to his dad. He is border line on reaching . If his article was longer and contained more info I would say keep. For now he can easily fit under his dad Deletion of Ramon Estevez WP:ENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2943 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final Destination 6: The Final Stand User:SL93 19:50, 18 September 2011 (UTC) delete Per Deletion of Final Destination 6: The Final Stand WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2944 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babylon 5: The Passing of the Techno-Mages – Casting Shadows User:Joe 05:28, 6 July 2014 (UTC) delete I did the usual range of searches, and don't see the sourcing we'd need to meet Deletion of Babylon 5: The Passing of the Techno-Mages – Casting Shadows WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2945 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Ruck User:Ukexpat 19:40, 5 April 2013 (UTC) delete spectacularly fails Deletion of Julian Ruck WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2946 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flow-through test User:FourViolas 06:36, 7 July 2016 (UTC) keep """Bravo to M. A. Bruhn. There may be some ambiguity remaining in that non-clinical """"flow-through assays"""" also exist (I added a MEDRS-compliant source discussing some), but that's a minor concern. Article as it stands approximately meets , with clinically relevant information cited to respected recent reviews""" Deletion of Flow-through test WP:MEDRS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2947 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China Attacks User:SlamDiego 14:04, 19 November 2009 (UTC) delete No indication of |“notability Deletion of China Attacks WP:NOTE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2948 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lom Harsh (2nd nomination) User:Nanophosis 17:38, 14 June 2018 (UTC) delete per #G4. The article was recreated by the original creator of the deleted page, and appears to be nearly identical to the deleted version Deletion of Lom Harsh (2nd nomination) WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +2949 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pari Passu Realty Corp. User:Gavin 07:43, 17 May 2009 (UTC) delete as there is no |verifiable evidence of |notability, and the lack of sourcing shows in its |promotional tone and |undue reliance on the views expressed in the company's own website Deletion of Pari Passu Realty Corp. WP:NRVE||WP:CORP||WP:SPAM||WP:UNDUE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2950 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CrossCharge User:AllyD 07:06, 8 June 2020 (UTC) delete A article by {{u|Evcharging}} describing a start-up company's proposition, with the text featuring superlatives about their product being the first and safest such product, maximising convenience, etc., without |reliable 3rd party sources. Aside from routine listings, searches find a 2015 brief Q&A with the company founder https://www.prospectsv.org/people-of-prospect-connectmyev/ and a February 2018 announcement about the venture arm of :Stanley Black & Decker taking a minority stake in the company https://www.clearygottlieb.com/news-and-insights/news-listing/stanley-ventures-invests-in-connectmyev but I am not finding the |independent coverage which would be needed ( / ) to sustain an article here, even if pruned of promotional wording Deletion of CrossCharge :WP:SPA||:WP:RS||:WP:RS||:WP:PRODUCT||:WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Single-purpose account 21 +2951 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airline Empires User:Siva1979 01:24, 21 August 2006 (UTC) delete Non-notable and reads like a game guide. Fairs poorly on too. All these compelling cases point that this article should be deleted. --Wikipedia:Esperanza|S Deletion of Airline Empires WP:GOOGLE Wikipedia:Search engine test 49 +2952 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kahaani 2 User:Gongshow 18:01, 14 February 2013 (UTC) merge to Kahaani#Sequel for now. This article duplicates the content from that section; seems for a standalone article for the sequel at this time Deletion of Kahaani 2 WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +2953 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuki Grewal User:Aseleste 03:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC) delete The subject does not meet any criteria of . Applying the less strict where is not always required compared to , the subject is still not notable. Two of three sources provided in the article are too trivial; the remaining one is not wp:independent being an interview without original content. Doing wp:before |searches yield very low quality results that are either not relevant, not wp:reliable, or not wp:independent. For valid sources, the ''combined'' coverage as required by is not significant enough to warrant an article Deletion of Kuki Grewal WP:NACTOR||WP:BASIC||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG||WP:SET||WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2954 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killing of Ma'Khia Bryant User:ThadeusOfNazereth 19:11, 23 April 2021 (UTC) keep clearly meets notability guidelines per and probably per as well. I'd also asks whoever closes this to disregard the delete votes that speculate as to whether the shooting was justified, which are clearly not grounded in policy Deletion of Killing of Ma'Khia Bryant WP:GNG||WP:EVENTCRIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2955 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tehreek Dawat-e-Faqr User:Anupmehra 16:37, 7 January 2015 (UTC) delete WP:PROMO that fails , and has 90% copyright violation confidence-https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Tehreek_Dawat-e-Faqr Deletion of Tehreek Dawat-e-Faqr WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2956 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaming Realms User:Lee 10:53, 25 May 2018 (UTC) keep A quick search finds loads of suitible references https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22Gaming+Realms%22&safe=off&rlz=1C1GGRV_enGB751GB751&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjdnMTx2KDbAhXIMewKHaYnAEkQ_AUICygC&biw=1280&bih=893 Deletion of Gaming Realms WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +2957 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Diva - 2018 User:K 23:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC) delete unlikely to be independently notable and Deletion of Miss Diva - 2018 WP:PROMO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2958 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Coles User:Dlohcierekim 10:49, 20 June 2017 (UTC) delete does not have sufficient coverage in RS to meet the GNG, not withstanding Deletion of Ray Coles WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2959 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of web application frameworks User:Tellyaddict 15:44, 6 February 2007 (UTC) delete not relevant per Deletion of Comparison of web application frameworks WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2960 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adult FriendFinder User:Gwernol 12:44, 1 February 2008 (UTC) keep while the current article has multiple problems and a notable lack of editors willing to improve it, the subject is, for better or worse, notable. The company is real and has attracted media coverage, so a |verifiable article could be produced. I'd suggest reducing what we have to a stub and making sure that the only properly sourced material is added back Deletion of Adult FriendFinder WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2961 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avinaash V. Rai User:Comatmebro 16:43, 31 May 2017 (UTC) delete Per Deletion of Avinaash V. Rai WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2962 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semen fetishism User:Eqdoktor 08:50, 15 January 2007 (UTC) merge into Bukkake if |ref sources are found, '''Delete''' as |original research if not Deletion of Semen fetishism WP:V||WP:NOR Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2963 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films considered the worst (9th nomination) User:MichaelQSchmidt 03:13, 12 July 2017 (UTC) keep Sheesh.... Even in not looking at the previous 8 failed deletion attempts, this meets inclusion standards for . I'm feeling that |chill Deletion of List of films considered the worst (9th nomination) WP:NOTAGAIN||WP:SALAT||WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +2964 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports timeline User:Armbrust 11:49, 30 September 2010 (UTC) delete """as |Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. It is not cleat what """"significant event"""" means and thus has no clear inclusion criteria. There is too many space for |POV and article has no sources. I would say the 1985 World Snooker Championship final is very significant, why was this not selected for 1985? Why is the first Ryder Cup more significant than the first World Snooker Championship? (1927""" Deletion of Sports timeline WP:IINFO||WP:POV Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2965 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luma Health User:Bearian 01:34, 19 October 2019 (UTC) keep Well, here's my two cents: a few of the sources are merely listings (''e.g.'' Bloomberg), while others (''WSJ'', Business review/journal articles; medical journal) are both |reliable and substantial. I'm leaning towards keeping because, overall, there is in fact |significant coverage of the corporation and its services Deletion of Luma Health WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2966 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Barrott User:Chubbles 03:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC) comment The article now includes an Allmusic bio and an ''Exclaim!'' review (both international press), as well as two reviews from UK outlets, and a Pitchfork Media longform about Ibiza music which includes an entire section about Barrott. This, particularly with the last one, ordinarily would hurdle the sourcing/exposure requirements for bands, based on past precedent. The musician meets Deletion of Mark Barrott WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2967 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Elizabeth Hallam User:onel5969 13:57, 3 November 2015 (UTC) delete per nom and above editors. Searches do not show her meeting Deletion of Kate Elizabeth Hallam WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2968 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Yozamp User:Clarityfiend 06:16, 5 September 2017 (UTC) delete One non-starring credit? C'mon. Way Deletion of Elizabeth Yozamp WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +2969 """Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/""""Zitterbewegung and Cold Fusion""""""" User:Hut 18:37, 8 November 2007 (UTC) delete original research, little notability. Seems to be created to promote this theory, in violation of and . An http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/%22zitterbewegung_and_cold_fusion%22 extremely similar article has also appeared on Wikinews, despite the fact it is obviously not a news story. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantum Ring Theory """Deletion of """"Zitterbewegung and Cold Fusion""""""" WP:COI||WP:SOAP Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +2970 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hushen Savani User:Piotrus 09:07, 31 March 2015 (UTC) delete The presented sources don't seem sufficient to make him pass Deletion of Hushen Savani WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2971 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Edward's College, East Gosford User:Twenty 14:56, 17 August 2007 (UTC) keep Found some |reliable sources on a quick google search Deletion of St. Edward's College, East Gosford WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2972 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor Septimus Pretorius User:Cirt 17:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC) delete as per above, and as unsourced Deletion of Doctor Septimus Pretorius WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2973 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piotr Musial User:Stuartyeates 01:10, 23 July 2011 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Piotr Musial WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2974 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comedy of Errors (band) User:Mattg82 02:11, 2 December 2011 (UTC) delete No significant coverage in |reliable sources, fails and Deletion of Comedy of Errors (band) WP:RS||WP:BAND||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +2975 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mario Party 9 User:WilliamH 14:20, 24 May 2008 (UTC) delete It may certainly be so, that ''it is highly likely'' the game will be made, but until this is verifiable then firmly applies Deletion of Mario Party 9 WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2976 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pixilang User:Twsx 12:06, 16 October 2007 (UTC) delete per nom, Deletion of Pixilang WP:PRODUCT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2977 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flandal Steelskin User:Satellizer 06:54, 2 May 2016 (UTC) merge no reliable sources from what I can tell. , Flandal Steelskin needs to demonstrate notability independent of the ''D&D'' franchise Deletion of Flandal Steelskin WP:NOTINHERITED Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +2978 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Life As A Teenage Robot: The Movie User:Joe 04:13, 15 August 2009 (UTC) delete Per Deletion of My Life As A Teenage Robot: The Movie WP:NFF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2979 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red and Anarchist black metal User:Bearian 16:36, 3 May 2016 (UTC) delete our |precedents show that most new genres of music are deleted, and I don't see why this would not be as well. Ping me if you need the pile of precedents Deletion of Red and Anarchist black metal WP:OUTCOMES Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +2980 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Employee relations User:Dominus 13:43, 18 October 2012 (UTC) delete Blatantly self-promotional OR that has zero utility as the basis of a future spinoff article. Right now, it's just a and whose primary purpose is to promote the business interests of the articles creator, and based solely on one extremely unreliable source. Best to flush it entirely, and build any future spin-off article on clean soil, rather than trying to salvage and expand on anything here. No evidence that a spin-off article is justified at the present time Deletion of Employee relations WP:DICDEF||WP:CFORK Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +2981 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ağcakent, Aziziye User:ThadeusOfNazereth 04:18, 11 April 2021 (UTC) keep The nom says these all fail because we can't use tables to establish notability, but my reading of and is that populated, legally recognized places are ''presumed'' to be notable, which I take to mean that we establish notability by ''virtue '' of their existence, something that acknowledges tables can do Deletion of Ağcakent, Aziziye WP:NGEO||WP:NGEO||WP:GEOLAND||WP:NGEO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2982 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YouTube statistics User:Stuartyeates 05:29, 25 November 2012 (UTC) delete all the references are to youtube sources. If it is rewritten from independent reliables sources, as required by , ping my talk page Deletion of YouTube statistics WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2983 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Karmi User:Mailer 10:40, 6 July 2012 (UTC) delete article is |original research - does not tally with the claimed sources provided Deletion of David Karmi WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +2984 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pinball Fish User:Schuym1 00:16, 29 December 2008 (UTC) delete Doesn't show notability per Deletion of Pinball Fish WP:NOTABILITY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2985 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christer Isulat User:Thompson 01:16, 20 August 2011 (UTC) delete lack of notability. Also, it states http://www.euphonics.ph/band/XTR here that 'XTR is the alter-ego of Christer Isulat', and what is the name of the articles creator? Xtr06. Deletion of Christer Isulat WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +2986 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClimateTalk User:Click23 17:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC) delete """Does not pass , it has not """"received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources""" Deletion of ClimateTalk WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2987 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teen Assassin User:Hobbes 05:00, 24 November 2011 (UTC) delete """Gbooks shows zero reviews. Puny, mostly primary or sales sites from a general search. The author did get a http://www.couriermail.com.au/ipad/sean-comes-up-with-novel-diy-approach/story-fn6ck620-1226123989330 cute little piece in a Brisbane paper, but I think it actually provides the most damning evidence: """"Now 17, Sean worked part-time at a local supermarket to raise $4000 to have Teen Assassin edited and self-published earlier this year after several unsuccessful approaches to publishers. The original print run sold out, and Sean last week printed another 100 copies of the action-thriller..."""" Fails """ Deletion of Teen Assassin WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2988 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RepliGo User:Elonka 21:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC) delete no indication that it passes . Concerns were raised a year ago, and no expansion has taken place Deletion of RepliGo WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2989 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junaid Azim Mattu User:Iamreallygoodatcheckers 06:26, 16 February 2020 (UTC) keep """per . He is the mayor of a city with 1,800,000 people, and that city is capital of the territory. The city he is mayor should fall under """"regional prominence"""" stated in POLOUTCOMES""" Deletion of Junaid Azim Mattu WP:POLOUTCOMES Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +2990 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speak Love Life Lessons (album) User:Gongshow 05:57, 4 June 2013 (UTC) delete per #A9|A9; the artist's page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Houston (2nd nomination)|has been deleted Deletion of Speak Love Life Lessons (album) WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +2991 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florida State University shooting (2nd nomination) User:Location 00:50, 21 September 2015 (UTC) delete Fails various criteria in Deletion of Florida State University shooting (2nd nomination) WP:EVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2992 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Anis User:SW3 03:40, 20 March 2017 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Black Anis WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2993 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesus (archangel) User:Hut 20:26, 5 May 2017 (UTC) delete per . Richard Carrier is one of the best known proponents of the Christ myth theory, the view that Jesus did not exist. AFAICT this article represents part of his views on the subject, as a possible explanation of where the idea of Jesus came from if Jesus was not a real historical person. The Christ myth theory is a fringe theory and has very, very little support in mainstream academic scholarship on the subject, so our policies and guidelines concerning fringe theories apply. Fringe theories (or aspects of them) only deserve independent articles they have ''been referenced extensively, and in a serious and reliable manner, by major publications that are independent of their promulgators and popularizers'' (). That is certainly going to require more sources than just Richard Carrier. Furthermore, per the article would have to make it clear that it is discussing a fringe theory with little mainstream acceptance, which this one doesn't Deletion of Jesus (archangel) WP:NFRINGE||WP:NFRINGE||WP:UNDUE Wikipedia:Fringe theories 44 +2994 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sofitel Chicago Magnificent Mile user:Andrew 11:49, 17 November 2020 (UTC) keep """WP:Run-of-the-mill is an |essay and """"''Essays have no official status, and do not speak for the Wikipedia community""" Deletion of Sofitel Chicago Magnificent Mile WP:ESSAY Wikipedia:Essays 9 +2995 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincent Salafia User:Shenme 01:39, 25 April 2006 (UTC) delete per and per Deletion of Vincent Salafia WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2996 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Cool Day in August User:MichaelQSchmidt 16:21, 28 February 2009 (UTC) delete without prejudice in agreement with the nom. I have also done a diligent search and have found of the film but nothing that shows anything past its simple existance Deletion of A Cool Day in August WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +2997 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dean Cates User:Gongshow 20:53, 30 May 2012 (UTC) delete No significant coverage found, and roles to date do not appear to meet Deletion of Dean Cates WP:ENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +2998 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Internet slang phrases (3rd nomination) User:DHowell 00:15, 26 October 2007 (UTC) keep """1) The part of prohibiting """"lists of defintions"""" is disputed, because there exist dozens of :Category:Glossaries|glossaries which are properly encyclopedic. 2) This is not a guide on how words, idioms, etc. ''should'' be used, but a document which describes how they ''are'' used; this is a difference which distinguishes a violation of from an encylopedic article. 3) The existence of anything similar on Wiktionary should not have any bearing on this article. Just like Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and series boxes|categories and lists can complement each other, so too can glossaries on Wikipedia and definitions on Wiktionary complement each other. Redundancy is not always bad. 4) """"''|There are some times when 'usefulness' can be the basis of a valid argument for inclusion. An encyclopedia should, by definition, be informative and useful to its readers. Try to exercise common sense, and consider how a non-trivial number of people will consider the information 'useful""" Deletion of List of Internet slang phrases (3rd nomination) WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:USEFUL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +2999 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maliz E. Beams User:Coolabahapple 12:55, 21 September 2018 (UTC) comment """i note that (nearly) all the other Counselor of the United States Department of State|counsellors have individual wikiarticles (i know that being in this position does not automatically make the person wikinotable but does reflect the notableness of such people), also that the article presently has 8 references, is there anything wrong with them (need more depth, not |reliable?)?, here are some more that editors may want to have a look at: from ''The Boston Globe'' - http://archive.boston.com/business/personalfinance/articles/2010/01/17/a_shift_from_retirement_planning_to_lifelong_planning/ """"From retirement planning to lifelong planning"""" - interview with Beams about the implications for retirement investors post GFC growth (subcription required), ''American Banker'' - https://www.americanbanker.com/slideshow/most-powerful-women-in-finance-2013 """"The 25 Most Powerful Women in Finance"""" - Beames is no. 8, ''Puget Sound Business Journal'' - https://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2018/09/17/voya-maliz-beams-board-cannabis-investment-network.html """"Ex-Voya CEO joins Bellevue-based cannabis investor group's advisory board"""" (subscription required""" Deletion of Maliz E. Beams WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3000 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olga Prokopova User:Cllgbksr 06:12, 13 April 2017 (UTC) delete The career section reads like an infomercial, subject fails to meet the simplest of standards for notability Deletion of Olga Prokopova WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3001 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacklyn Lick User:Sammy1339 13:07, 27 August 2015 (UTC) keep based on #3. She has appeared in the notable mainstream films Orgazmo, The Big Lebowski, Bikini Planet (film), and Homo Erectus (film Deletion of Jacklyn Lick WP:PORNBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3002 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helping Angels User:Wqwt 16:04, 21 February 2018 (UTC) delete """There are no in-line references but the """"Sources"""" section doesn't seem too great either. i. and iii. are broken links. ii. seems like a personal site. iv. Young Leadership International is not a reputable source. v. Sk-II Nona interview is broken as well and I couldn't find them on Google, but I only looked briefly. vi. and vii. are personal sites. viii. The Star interview is broken as well. In fact, none of the links are working. There is just no evidence of otability""" Deletion of Helping Angels WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3003 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Pham User:Blueboy96 18:22, 10 May 2008 (UTC) delete as blatant |vanispamcruftisement. Note that nearly all of the principal contributors are socks of {{user|Azurik}}, whom I have blocked for abusive sockpuppetry Deletion of John Pham WP:VSCA Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +3004 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shyanne Melendez User:Deli 21:51, 21 February 2008 (UTC) delete Without evidence of anything more than the one role mentioned in the article, the subject does not meet Deletion of Shyanne Melendez WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3005 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles W. Heyl User:JackFromReedsburg 19:04, 7 April 2021 (UTC) keep Meets . This article needs major work and attention, but not to be deleted Deletion of Charles W. Heyl WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3006 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Seal User:Drawn 21:58, 3 May 2009 (UTC) comment The article is basically completely unsourced. It is a very detailed c.v. sort of article and I doubt that much detail could be properly |verified. If the article is kept it needs to be severely cleaned and pruned. I am also concerned about '''Reidthaler's conflict of interest''' in promoting Karen Seal Deletion of Karen Seal WP:VERIFY Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3007 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Porno Valley User:Wikipedian 10:18, 15 September 2012 (UTC) keep nbsp;– the links provided by Morbidthoughts can be used to put together a article passing Deletion of Porno Valley WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3008 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindsay Soto User:Tarheel95 19:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC) delete per nom and Deletion of Lindsay Soto WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3009 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Havasu 95 Speedway User:Darkwind 20:06, 17 January 2013 (UTC) comment When evaluating the PROD, I found several newspaper articles, implying that further research might turn up enough coverage to meet , so I contested the PROD on that basis. &mdash Deletion of Havasu 95 Speedway WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3010 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Racial Contract User:Mangoe 14:45, 23 October 2017 (UTC) keep though bordering on . It's hard to tell in what we have which parts are Mills's ideas being recounted without citations, and which parts are the musings of the editor. That said, GScholar shows plenty of refs to this book and its ideas Deletion of The Racial Contract WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +3011 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Levon Smith User:Fenix 11:50, 9 October 2014 (UTC) delete Fails as has not played senior international football nor played in a |fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy |GNG Deletion of Levon Smith WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3012 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Itrw User:Srose 16:57, 8 September 2006 (UTC) merge """what is valid and isn't already in Ancient Egyptian units of measurement. Itrw appears to be an archaic term, per about 700 http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=Itrw+measurement google results for Itrw measurement. Many of these results are either Wikipedia (the article itself and its mention in Ancient Egyptian units of measurements), mirrors of the Wikipedia results, or completely unrelated blogs and/or businesses. After reading the RfAr, I'm quite sure that the reason I cannot find any online source (even an ''unreliable'' one) to back up half of the claims in the article is that they're |fabricated or |original research. I looked for confirming sources under the term """"atur"""" as well""" Deletion of Itrw WP:HOAX||WP:OR Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes 40 +3013 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Culbann C.P.C (2nd nomination) User:Joe 18:52, 17 June 2010 (UTC) comment Hosting a notable event does not show automatic notability per . In Schmidt's searches, I didn't see any significant coverage Deletion of Culbann C.P.C (2nd nomination) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3014 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matty Wilkinson User:Number 22:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC) delete """per the failure. Playing for a """"professional team"""" isn't relevant here""" Deletion of Matty Wilkinson WP:RLN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3015 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Yamaha Portasound keyboards User:Superastig 06:12, 28 May 2020 (UTC) merge to Yamaha Portasound: Article easily fails . My vote stands Deletion of List of Yamaha Portasound keyboards WP:LISTN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3016 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of works for the theatre portraying paedophilia or sexual abuse of minors User:Pohta 12:16, 9 February 2010 (UTC) delete Unsourced . I'm not opposed to someone adding well-referenced, culturally relevant plays two the articles on pedophilia and child sexual abuse. These are not necessarily the same theme, and conflating them is a bad idea. The editor doing that might as well start from scratch Deletion of List of works for the theatre portraying paedophilia or sexual abuse of minors WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3017 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adele Croucamp User:Tamsier NONE delete WP:A7 - Deletion of Adele Croucamp WP:AUTOBIO Wikipedia:Autobiography 75 +3018 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bottle toss User:Blueboy96 22:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC) delete Either a hoax, or completely |made up Deletion of Bottle toss WP:NFT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +3019 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transmetals User:Satellizer 22:39, 10 May 2016 (UTC) merge the nominator's rationale is perfectly valid. No evidence of ''independent'' notability, thus failing not only but also Deletion of Transmetals WP:GNG||WP:NOTINHERITED Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3020 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Gomez User:STATicVapor 18:24, 9 September 2014 (UTC) delete Certainly does not meet in any way Deletion of Diana Gomez WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3021 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luka Magnotta (4th nomination) [[User talk:66.102.83.61|talk]]) 06:14, 17 June 2012 (UTC) keep The murder of Lin Jun is notable but . The fabricated nonsense about an affair with Karla Homolka is not, nor is most of the other attention whoring that's found its way onto this page. If notability exists for one event only, the article should be named for the event, not for a suspect who has neither been charged nor tried for the . Special:Contributions/66.102.83.61|66.102.83.61 Deletion of Luka Magnotta (4th nomination) WP:BLP1E||WP:BLPCRIME Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +3022 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fictional portrayals of psychopaths in film (2nd nomination) User:SirFozzie 00:35, 30 August 2007 (UTC) delete Unfortunately, it's and Well-written, but it's complete and utter Deletion of Fictional portrayals of psychopaths in film (2nd nomination) WP:USEFUL||WP:OR Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +3023 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamko User:Otr500 14:20, 24 February 2019 (UTC) keep There is always the old |other stuff argument when that is not only generally a bad argument but not supported by any policies or guidelines. The company has been around a long time and even though likely rated outside the top ten (was #11) I can see some notability although a search seems to be more about the class action lawsuit. That is not abnormal as GAF, Owen Corning, Atlas, CertainTeed, IKO, and Globe Building Materials (probably others) along with Tamko, had these suits over roof failures (and fading), deceptive warranties, substandard roofing shingle manufacturing, false advertising, etc..., for fiberglass, organic, and asphalt shingles. My issue is that because a company has good advertising, as shown by mostly |primary sources, does not equate to notability regardless of how much we like it. Adding more primary sources to support notability does not make the case Deletion of Tamko WP:OTHER||WP:PRIMARY Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +3024 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuran no Yami User:NeoChaosX 04:04, 5 July 2007 (UTC) delete as fan-created organization based on the series Naruto. Most fanfiction is non-notable per Deletion of Kuran no Yami WP:FICT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3025 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theertha Artists Collective User:NawlinWiki 18:11, 13 September 2015 (UTC) delete unless someone can provide sources that meet Deletion of Theertha Artists Collective WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3026 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MundoNick.com User:Rjd0060 03:21, 25 September 2007 (UTC) delete I would say redirect to MundoNick, but it doesn't exist, so just delete it. per Deletion of MundoNick.com WP:NOTE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3027 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voodoo Gods User:GreenRunner0 17:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC) keep """per Ensemble Criteria #6: ''""""Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a member of two or more independently notable ensembles""" Deletion of Voodoo Gods WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3028 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mindmistress User:Dragonfiend 17:55, 19 April 2006 (UTC) delete article does not meet Deletion of Mindmistress WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3029 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Alexander King's World War III Trilogy User:MichaelQSchmidt 05:10, 6 August 2008 (UTC) delete per Wikipedia:Notabilty & . Not a source in the entire article, which smacks of Wikipedia:OR. And if its here only as a place to post a proposal, is a violation of Wikipedia:COI Deletion of Matthew Alexander King's World War III Trilogy WP:MADEUP Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +3030 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Micro Award User:HeartSWild 17:35, 3 September 2010 (UTC) merge to Flash fiction. This is a change from my ''keep'' vote. I disagree with some of Kinu's assertions above. I see three |reliable sources currently being used for notability (1, 7, 13). I think the other notable source I previously identified is the now broken link. #1 is not a press release and #7 and #13 are ''clearly'' reliable sources per . The rest of the references are also reliable, just not sources of notability Deletion of Micro Award WP:RS||WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3031 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George M. Campbell User:7 03:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC) keep Lot of reliable sources. No compliance with efore. Cf., Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John C. England. Will easily meet or exceed . This is just a part of a mass deletion effort in different form. It was a ''second'' deletion nomination, that was part of a proposed mass slaughter. Wolf in sheep's clothing. As a matter of housekeeping, I would note that this is the ''second'' nomination for deletion. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Henry Allen. The record should be corrected accordingly.Further, if it is not kept, the proposed redirect is a poor fit. Clearly it would be better to go to Squadron 8, rather than some generic medal burial ground Deletion of George M. Campbell WP:B||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Bots 91 +3032 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Australians in international prisons (2nd nomination) User:Krimpet 10:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC) delete The individuals themselves may be notable and merit articles on their plights, but the criteria used for this list seems overly arbitrary and seems to |use sources to advocate a specific point of view. (FWIW, I also strongly oppose capital punishment, yet agree that this list seems incongruent with our NPOV Deletion of List of Australians in international prisons (2nd nomination) WP:SYN Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3033 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scoil an Spioraid Naoimh User:Jackmcbarn 23:23, 2 July 2014 (UTC) merge to Bishopstown (and maybe mention it there) per Deletion of Scoil an Spioraid Naoimh WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +3034 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswati VII User:Abecedare 22:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC) merge """The subject is possibly notable, but I could not locate any reliable sources online. At present we can only write a 1 line sourced stub (""""... was a Shankaracharya at the Kanchi Math from 1897-94""""), based on the http://www.kamakoti.org/peeth/origin.html Kanchi Math website, which has glaring |redflag issues (see""" Deletion of Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswati VII WP:REDFLAG Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3035 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of file sharing software User:TheM62Manchester 09:00, 10 August 2006 (UTC) delete move to as example of redundant article Deletion of List of file sharing software WP:BJAODN Wikipedia:Silly Things 52 +3036 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elijah Lubala User:K 02:21, 20 September 2016 (UTC) delete per ; strictly a vanity page lacking in RS. '''Salt''' is a good suggestion Deletion of Elijah Lubala WP:PROMO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3037 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Normal Bob Smith (2nd nomination) User:Cbrown1023 20:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC) delete The fact that it was recreated without a is enough for me. But it also seems to be a little on the unnotable side... (the bunch of SPAs don't help either Deletion of Normal Bob Smith (2nd nomination) WP:DRV Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +3038 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nash Engineering Company User:VMS 23:54, 1 August 2015 (UTC) keep as passing Deletion of Nash Engineering Company WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3039 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Kuya's Wedding User:MichaelQSchmidt 19:37, 23 January 2016 (UTC) keep per topic meeting . Yes the inexperienced editor created a |poor article, which was https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=My_Kuya%27s_Wedding&type=revision&diff=701154938&oldid=701123559 quickly sent to AFD... but even though |AFD is not meant to force cleanup, the topic was easy to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=My_Kuya%27s_Wedding&type=revision&diff=701302748&oldid=701154938 improve. There is really no need for this to remain listed. It serves the project that this remain and be further improved over time and through regular editing Deletion of My Kuya's Wedding WP:NF||WP:UGLY||WP:NOTCLEANUP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3040 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phan-Ku Ryu Jujitsu User:Ducknish 23:08, 3 May 2012 (UTC) delete I can't find any reliable outside sources to support the article, so I'd say it fails Deletion of Phan-Ku Ryu Jujitsu WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3041 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Hopewell User:Spitfire 19:43, 1 April 2009 (UTC) delete This simply does not meet : it has not been non-trival subject of any secondary sources Deletion of New Hopewell WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3042 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playboy Cyber Girl (2nd nomination) User:K 00:52, 9 January 2018 (UTC) delete Does not meet and significant RS coverage not found. and trivia Deletion of Playboy Cyber Girl (2nd nomination) WP:LISTN||WP:LISTCRUFT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3043 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiffany Anastasia Lowe User:Daniel 22:03, 16 August 2006 (UTC) keep Article neads substantial cleanup to comply with , but doesn't deserve to be completely killed Deletion of Tiffany Anastasia Lowe WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +3044 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deviance in modern film User:Eddie 00:49, 10 May 2009 (UTC) delete for being Deletion of Deviance in modern film WP:SOAP Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3045 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Heldmann User:E 14:25, 10 July 2019 (UTC) keep as Nom states, page needs improvement. However, I ran a and in a proquest news archive search I can see book reviews and coverage going back to the publication of his first book in the 1990s. Added two book reviews and a NYTimes article stating that one of his books sold 300,000 copied. This page just needs an editor to put the work in, but it may require access to news archive searches Deletion of Carl Heldmann WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +3046 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Amy Fitzpatrick User:BabbaQ 14:57, 1 September 2011 (UTC) keep does not fail , per coverage. and does not apply in my opinion to any article as Wikipedia IS in fact built on news. Without news no article about any person would have been made. Most wikipedia articles are sourced with news-sites material. Anyway notable disappearance article Deletion of Disappearance of Amy Fitzpatrick WP:VICTIM||WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3047 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circle justice User:Nosebagbear 19:47, 24 July 2018 (UTC) merge seems like a good faith . Give that the content has already been moved over I'd be happy for this to be a redirect rather a merge Deletion of Circle justice WP:REDUNDANTFORK Wikipedia:Content forking 33 +3048 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zionist attitudes toward the Palestinian Arabs User:Shot 11:19, 1 January 2008 (UTC) delete """Doesn't read like something that appears in an encyclopedia. It seems to be a collection of material from various sources |welded together into an essay. The fact that it is from one editor is a little worrying inasmuch as that implies a lack of consensus, particularly with the |ownership issues from that editor. The article doesn't seem to follow the title but perhaps would be better retitled to """"Zionism and 101 reasons I dislike it..."""". Unfortunately the article does look beyond repair, not without gutting it to |neutralise the |forking going on""" Deletion of Zionist attitudes toward the Palestinian Arabs WP:SYN||WP:OWN||WP:NPOV||WP:POVFORK Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3049 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/March 0 User:Timtrent 23:24, 28 December 2009 (UTC) delete I don't see that being mentioned in a spreadsheet program has any encyclopaedic merit in terms of Deletion of March 0 WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3050 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elika Associates User:Hrafn 06:27, 30 November 2010 (UTC) delete coverage is mainly in primary sources & trade rags, with only occasional & tangential coverage in more mainstream publications. Combine this with the obvious self-promotion/COI concerns (and I would note that Elika2010 has ''exacerbated'' those concerns by participating, quite incautiously, in this AfD, in violation of -- giving very little reason to assume that they wouldn't continue to edit the article), and I do not think keeping this article would be a wise decision Deletion of Elika Associates WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +3051 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colloquy (company) User:Hut 14:42, 31 December 2011 (UTC) delete """a large number of sources have been added to the article in an attempt to rescue it, but they do not demonstrate notability. Apart from the company website (which is not independent) they are all news articles which report on surveys conducted by Colloquy. Coverage of the company itself is limited to brief descriptions such as """"a marketing consultant and publisher"""" and quotations from people associated with the company. requires that the coverage of the subject is significant and """"passing mention, such as identifying a quoted person as working for an organization"""" is specifically excluded. https://www.wpi.edu/Pubs/E-project/Available/E-project-042408-093903/unrestricted/MGMQPRamsdellRuscittiFinal2008.pdf is an undergraduate report and thus not very reliable, and coverage of the company itself is limited to a passing mention of """"a leading provider of loyalty-marketing information, consulting, research and education"""" in a paragraph about one of their surveys. A search on Google News produces a large number of hits, but on closer inspection they turn out to be brief quotes along the lines of those already in the article or press releases by the company itself. Based on this Colloquy does not satisfy """ Deletion of Colloquy (company) WP:CORP||WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3052 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silas Hathaway (2nd nomination) User:Bearcat 14:38, 19 March 2020 (UTC) delete """No matter how notable something may sound in theory, a person still has to have |reliable source coverage ''supporting'' their notability claim before they get a Wikipedia article for it. Having had an acting role as a baby is not """"inherently"""" notable enough to exempt a person from having to clear """ Deletion of Silas Hathaway (2nd nomination) WP:RS||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3053 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeviceAtlas User:Pawelpiejko 22:53, 11 September 2016 (UTC) keep clearly meets or the GNG. Loads of coverage from multiple independent sources including references to five books on web design. It definitely belongs on Wikipedia. — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Deletion of DeviceAtlas WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3054 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stdlib.h [[User talk:202.124.72.20|talk]]) 04:31, 6 November 2011 (UTC) keep Plenty of sources exist, and is obviously satisfied. As to the redirect proposals, C miscellaneous operations is up for deletion, while C_standard_library#ISO_C_library_headers is just a table of article pointers, and requires '''this''' article to exist. -- Special:Contributions/202.124.72.20|202.124.72.20 Deletion of Stdlib.h WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3055 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khao Chang Puek User:Antepenultimate 05:59, 19 November 2016 (UTC) comment after https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khao_Chang_Puek&curid=52272719&diff=750356042&oldid=750109967 removing a great deal of promo fluff, this seems to be an article about a mountain rather than a hike, and as such should be judged by standards. No comment as yet whether it passes those standards Deletion of Khao Chang Puek WP:GEOLAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3056 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dom Fera User:Ecoleetage 13:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC) delete A review of the article's history reveals problems regarding and . Sorry, Dom Deletion of Dom Fera WP:COI||WP:SPA Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +3057 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aditya Kohli User:Cutest 15:03, 3 October 2014 (UTC) delete Seems to be |too soon and the contributor's username and the license used for the image of infbox indicated the |conflict of interest. — Deletion of Aditya Kohli WP:TOOSOON||WP:COI Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +3058 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travis Karter NONE NONE keep initially i was ambivalent to the overall debate, but i was able to find an additional, recent source from a national publication. I included it in the works cited of the article. I would vote to keep, as this article now sufficiently satisfies #1 of Deletion of Travis Karter WP:NMUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3059 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MiJournal User:Trevj 01:48, 13 November 2013 (UTC) delete per . I found links to downloads and |BLOGS but no |reliable sources except the one already contained within the article. Perhaps it's |TOOSOON, in which case perhaps this could be considered a |SOFTDELETE for de-PRODing again in the future if/when notability is clearly established Deletion of MiJournal WP:NSOFT||WP:BLOGS||WP:TOOSOON||WP:SOFTDELETE||WP:reliable sources Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3060 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nature of science User:Trusilver 05:55, 5 August 2008 (UTC) delete This article appears to be heavy with and hints a little bit at synthesis. Anything that can be salvaged should be merged if possible Deletion of Nature of science WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3061 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron beelner User:Jayden54 13:52, 2 January 2007 (UTC) delete not notable per Deletion of Aaron beelner WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3062 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robbin Harms User:RebeccaGreen 20:24, 22 June 2019 (UTC) keep """As far as I can see, he meets #3 """"Competed in a series or race of worldwide or national interest"""", and perhaps also #1 (though I don't know what counts as """"a fully professional series""""). This guy has raced in Grand Prix races in many countries (definitely of national interest in those countries, and some also definitely of international interest). Not having sources is not a reason to delete an article, per , so why bring it to AfD? Why not just find and add """"at least one source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article""""???? I have added one source, so it's no longer unsourced, but I am really not interested in motorsports. Did the nominator do , especially """"The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search""""? and note """"If you find that adequate sources ''do appear to exist'', the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources""" Deletion of Robbin Harms WP:NMOTORSPORT||WP:NEXIST||WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3063 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alta Mira (2nd nomination) User:Jujutacular 18:00, 3 May 2010 (UTC) delete Unable to find evidence that this facility passes or Deletion of Alta Mira (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3064 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis Herrick User:Jmertel23 17:20, 3 July 2018 (UTC) delete listed sources are either for his personal website, his publishers' websites, or to organizations' main pages, which don't include info about him. No Deletion of Dennis Herrick WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3065 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of car crash songs User:Carlossuarez46 21:16, 2 August 2007 (UTC) delete """although not technically so titled, this is a """"songs about"""" list, and devoid of such guidance telling us how much """"about"""" the subject the song must be and es telling us each song so listed is at least that much about the subject matter. Apparently the list despite its title includes motorcycle crashes as well, if kept it should be retitled to reflect that topic creep""" Deletion of List of car crash songs WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3066 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce McArthur User:E 14:15, 14 February 2018 (UTC) keep """Undoubtedly this series of murders is sufficiently notorious to support an article (and one ought to be created). Regarding the BLP concerns, in this case McArthur's name has been so widely disseminated by that he can support an article, and McArthur's """"fame"""" as a suspect means that privacy concerns are trumped by as per """ Deletion of Bruce McArthur WP:RS||WP:BLPNAME Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3067 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Gamba Osaka season User:Fenix 11:47, 27 June 2017 (UTC) delete per, insufficient information for an article at this moment Deletion of 2020 Gamba Osaka season WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3068 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escargo User:Metropolitan90 05:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC) delete as a |hoax given that the references are fake. But even if the article were completely true, it would just be a dictionary definition of an obscure slang word, and |Wikipedia is not a dictionary Deletion of Escargo WP:HOAX||WP:WINAD Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes 40 +3069 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eva Zu Beck User:Piotrus 04:54, 12 July 2021 (UTC) delete I concur that the notability is pretty much due to one incident. in my book Deletion of Eva Zu Beck WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +3070 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odoo User:Odony 09:29, 6 February 2015 (UTC) keep Odoo is the new name of OpenERP (it is a redirection). A Google search gives more than 600k results for either Odoo or OpenERP, from thousands of sources (keep in mind). A search for https://www.google.be/search?tbs=bks:1&q=OpenERP&qscrl=1 books gives hundreds of books about OpenERP/Odoo. http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=odoo%2C%20openerp%2C%20tinyerp&cmpt=q&tz= Google Trends shows the history of the project's name and popularity. More random examples: Odoo was recently selected in the http://opensource.com/business/15/1/top-project-management-tools-2015 top 5 project management tools for 2015 on opensource.com, in the http://www.linux.com/news/software/applications/800827-best-linux-and-open-source-apps-for-the-enterprise-in-2015 Best Linux and Open Source Apps for the Enterprise in 2015 of linux.com, nominated for the http://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/be/Documents/technology/DeloitteTechnologyFast50/Rankings/Fast50-ListNominees2014_Belgium.pdf Deloitte Technology Fast 50 2014. The product also won a BOSSIE Award two years in a row, under its former name, OpenERP, in http://www.infoworld.com/slideshow/65165 2012 and http://www.infoworld.com/slideshow/119652 2013. According to and , the above should be sufficient to establish notability, even if the article contents itself should certainly be improved. As a comparison, here is what http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=openerp%2Bodoo%2Btinyerp%2C%20openbravo&cmpt=q&tz= Google Trends says about popularity of OpenERP vs Openbravo. By that measure, the Openbravo article and a great many other ones would have to face deletion as well Deletion of Odoo WP:NTEMP||WP:NNC||WP:ARTN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3071 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naomi Kent User:Tubezone 01:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC) comment She definitely is mentioned on the Leicester Sound web page, so she's not a hoax (although many radio personalities use stage names), but notability is another question. If the source of the interview can't be verified, this article should be speedied as an |attack page, looks like someone wants to make her appear to be a bimbo Deletion of Naomi Kent WP:APAGE Wikipedia:Attack page 13 +3072 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Basran User:Bearcat 18:15, 11 October 2019 (UTC) keep """I'll grant that this is one of the last articles about a mayor that I created ''before'' our notability standard for mayors was tightened up from """"a certain arbitrary population figure confers automatic inclusion rights, so all you have to do is show verification that they've been elected as a mayor"""" to """"you need to write a substantive and well-sourced article that actually delves into detail about his political impact"""" — so it certainly does need significant improvement, and is not an accurate reflection of the amount of effort I would have put into the article if I were creating it today (Doug Craig (politician) is a more representative sample of that). But notability is ultimately based much more on the |existence of suitable sources, not on the current quality of the article, and Basran most certainly does have the kind of sourcing needed to improve the article with. Nominator is incorrect that statewide/provincewide office is always a base requirement for passing — while that is the lowest level of political office at which we ''automatically'' accept ''all'' MLAs as being permanently notable without having to achieve anything more than serving in the legislature, mayors of significant cities most certainly are also considered notable if we have the sources with which to write a substantive article. Nominator is also incorrect that mayoral notability always requires book-length works about his life — book-length biographies certainly count as ''bolsterers'' of notability if they do exist, but the existence of book-length biographies is not a mandatory condition that a mayor always has to have before he can ever be deemed notable. If there are enough other kinds of sources (like newspaper journalism) to establish a pass of NPOL #2, then NPOL #2 is still passed""" Deletion of Colin Basran WP:NEXIST||WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3073 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man-At-Arms User:Zxcvbnm 17:28, 8 October 2020 (UTC) merge """Does not seem to pass . The current title should be redirected to Man-at-arms. """"Duh! He's one of the main characters of X!"""" may work for Wikia, but not Wikipedia""" Deletion of Man-At-Arms WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3074 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of gimmicks in television shows User:Acalamari 20:46, 17 April 2007 (UTC) delete per violations Deletion of List of gimmicks in television shows WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3075 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Novik User:Canuckle 22:48, 18 June 2007 (UTC) delete To the creator, the encyclopedia is for articles on ''notable'' people judged by secondary, reliable sources to have wide recognition, influence or impact. Simply being a company executive isn't enough. Someday I hope that my company's CEO and Board Chair are notable enough for their own article. Until I'm certain they pass the guideline otability (people), I'll wait to post and I'll flag the conflict of interest, too Deletion of Steven Novik WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3076 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of short place names User:Fram 08:34, 12 January 2010 (UTC) delete Where are the sources about these short place names? The one Colonel Warden supplies certainly doesn't pass any interpretation of . The fact that some sources consider very short place names (or very long ones) as unusual is already mentioned in Place names considered unusual, where more info can be included. But this is insufficient to have a separate list for subjects which share only a minor, inconsequential characteristic (the length of the placename has no relation to the actual village, apart from those one or two extremely long ones luring tourists by that ''amusing'' characteristic Deletion of List of short place names WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3077 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keas Bees User:Afluent 10:31, 21 January 2007 (UTC) merge to Streetlight Manifesto. |Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, and this album has not been officially announced, at least, from the information I gather. I do support the attempt to bold redirect, but it appears that the consensus is against that atm Deletion of Keas Bees WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3078 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayttm User:Lulu 08:04, 15 January 2010 (UTC) keep This nomination, like a number of software noms by the same few editors, seems outright crazy and y. This software is cited in multiple independent sources, indicating notability. Moreover, the tone of the article is generally neutral, factual and informative. Any moderate improvements to tone or content are just normal editing Deletion of Ayttm WP:POINT Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +3079 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayapa User:Rsrikanth05 19:42, 7 May 2019 (UTC) keep Satisfied Deletion of Mayapa WP:GEOLAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3080 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novak Djokovic in 2011 User:Armbrust 21:41, 25 May 2011 (UTC) keep as there are enough references to pass |GNG Deletion of Novak Djokovic in 2011 WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3081 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Gifty Opoku-Agyeman User:Jayzlimno 22:36, 6 June 2020 (UTC) keep This is a well-referenced article and clearly satisfies . Opoku-Agyeman's establishment of Black Birders Week alone warrants notability which has been covered in many news outlets including CNN and Smithsonian, among others. As others have already stated, this article was not self-created and is properly reporting on a notable figure Deletion of Anna Gifty Opoku-Agyeman WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3082 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Anthony Matthews User:Bearian 00:58, 15 April 2020 (UTC) delete per {{U|Caro7200}}, , and . No evidence of making it as a musician. Rappers are supposed to collaborate with DJs, etc. He seems very run of the mill. He should have gone to college like Christopher Reid Deletion of Jacob Anthony Matthews WP:MUSICBIO||WP:MILL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3083 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Rudd User:Accounting4Taste 19:39, 9 October 2007 (UTC) delete Google search gets confused with people with the same name, but his current employers don't post any biographical information that I could find. No third-party sources beyond his name. Doesn't meet otable Deletion of Neil Rudd WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3084 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolution of cooperation User:Colonel 19:10, 11 May 2013 (UTC) keep The nominator's user page hasn't been deleted; I suppose he just hasn't created one. Anyway, the arguments for deletion are either false or not in accordance with our editing policies of and . |AFD is not cleanup Deletion of Evolution of cooperation WP:IMPERFECT||WP:PRESERVE||WP:NOTCLEANUP Wikipedia:Editing policy 24 +3085 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tocquigny User:Kinu 18:53, 31 October 2014 (UTC) delete I'm not seeing enough coverage to satisfy or . The ''Advertising Age'' story and the Zagat article (which is really a promotional piece) linked above barely mention the agency. I don't see much in the way of anything that might meet and that isn't routine local coverage. The awards, quite frankly, don't appear to convey any sort of notability Deletion of Tocquigny WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3086 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water Lilies Food User:HighKing 17:19, 24 July 2018 (UTC) delete There doesn't appear to be any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and Deletion of Water Lilies Food WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3087 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paganus User:Blackmetalbaz 00:44, 18 August 2008 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Paganus WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3088 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heathville Road User:Davidpdx 01:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC) delete No assertion of noteablity, fails Deletion of Heathville Road WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3089 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of App Store applications (Science) User:B 04:14, 26 February 2010 (UTC) delete as prodder. |Wikipedia is neither a price list nor a catalog. I found this as I was checking out the deletion discussion for its redirect List of App Store applications - do I see a #G8|speedy deletion of dependent page coming Deletion of List of App Store applications (Science) WP:NOT||WP:CSD Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3090 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arsalan Anwar (2nd nomination) User:DevaCat1 23:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC) keep He played in both first class cricket (which passes for ) and U19 international cricket (which improves general notability). Plus, articles shouldn't be up for AfD every month in the hope that there is a different result. This looks like bad faith gaming of the system Deletion of Arsalan Anwar (2nd nomination) WP:NCRIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3091 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erick Marín User:JMHamo 21:24, 23 March 2014 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Erick Marín WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3092 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanon Wakeshima [[User talk:76.222.241.44|talk]]) 04:23, 3 January 2009 (UTC) keep I draw your attention to criteria #2 of . She has landed a charted position on a national chart (#22 w/ her first single Still Doll on the Oricon daily), and therefore is a notable artist. She must only meet one item for her to be included as a notable artist. —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/76.222.241.44|76.222.241.44 Deletion of Kanon Wakeshima WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3093 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quest Atlantis User:Cymsdale 12:35, 25 February 2006 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Quest Atlantis WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Spam 26 +3094 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrison train crash User:Bobrayner 10:21, 21 February 2011 (UTC) keep Passes the |GNG by a comfortable margin Deletion of Garrison train crash WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3095 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Sue Cooper (2nd nomination) User:Morbidthoughts 19:20, 6 April 2010 (UTC) keep Cybergirl of the Year award reported by multiple reliable source passes . She also has enough coverage for me to pass the general notability guidelines Deletion of Amy Sue Cooper (2nd nomination) WP:PORNBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3096 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony J. Hilder (2nd nomination) User:RebeccaGreen 02:29, 3 February 2019 (UTC) keep I have not looked at the article or most of the content above, but from the sources given by 3 editors immediately above, it appears that there is significant and sustained coverage in independent, reliable sources, so he meets . It seems that part of the coverage is for his music industry work, and part for his conspiracy views, but it's not necessary for him to meet specific notability criteria when there is sufficient overall for him to meet . If the article needs improving, that is another issue (and, from the comments made above, seems to be controversial in itself Deletion of Anthony J. Hilder (2nd nomination) WP:BASIC||WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3097 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.J. Coyle User:Kinu 05:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC) delete violates . The store's site cannot be considered a third-party source per Deletion of A.J. Coyle WP:V||WP:RS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3098 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strongsville City Teachers' Strike of 2013 User:AutomaticStrikeout 02:18, 15 March 2013 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Strongsville City Teachers' Strike of 2013 WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3099 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celeste Newbrough User:RightCowLeftCoast 07:01, 25 August 2012 (UTC) delete Subject fails & . Multiple passing mentions of the subject, however none that would be considered ''significant coverage'' as required in . Although subject has authored a book, subject does not meet criteria set forth in AUTHOR or ANYBIO Deletion of Celeste Newbrough WP:AUTHOR||WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3100 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn Johnson User:MER 08:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC) delete http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22Shawn+Johnson%22&btnG=Search ghits seem to be unrelated. Possible |verifiability concerns Deletion of Shawn Johnson WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3101 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fucking shit User:Hillabear10 17:04, 23 August 2012 (UTC) delete As per Deletion of Fucking shit WP:NOTDIC Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +3102 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fat Controller User:AllyD 09:38, 10 November 2020 (UTC) keep """There was a brief discussion following the nominator's previous PROD on this article: :Talk:The_Fat_Controller#Query_on_notability. As I said in that discussion, my concern is that """"The Fat Controller"""" is often used in wider discussions, from The Economist to the Daily Telegraph (and again more recently: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2020/11/07/network-rail-boss-lined-lead-fat-controller-rail-shake-up/ Network Rail boss lined up to lead ‘Fat Controller’ rail shake-up""""); the nominator queried whether that establishes it as more a . I see that point but think there is enough usage, ranging from specific to the Awdry books and subsequent media, through the """"Other Uses"""" listed in the article, to its frequent referential usage in broader discussion of UK rail management to merit a distinct article. (There is also the re-purposing of the character in Will Self's :My Idea of Fun, a secondary reuse discussed in various sources such as https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=av15DwAAQBAJ&lpg=PA295&pg=PA295 this""" Deletion of The Fat Controller :WP:DICDEF Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +3103 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astriga Film Industry User:Schuym1 19:39, 14 December 2008 (UTC) delete No chance of passing Deletion of Astriga Film Industry WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3104 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyber Troopers Virtual On Force User:Captainktainer 16:50, 25 July 2006 (UTC) comment Anything not supported by references is either |original research, a copyright violation, or a hoax, and should either be referenced or deleted by Wikipedia guidelines. The policy on reliable sources and verifiability is ironclad; we can't keep an article if it isn't sourced Deletion of Cyber Troopers Virtual On Force WP:NOR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3105 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Godzilla (2012 film) (2nd nomination) User:MichaelQSchmidt 07:08, 9 February 2011 (UTC) comment Yes it is... but so what? IMDB is '''NOT''' a reliable source and has nothing to do with Wikipedia determination of what consitutes |notability. Their errors and lag time in making their own updates does not equate to us doing the same thing. We're faster, and we offer our readers actual sources for what is contained within our articles Deletion of Godzilla (2012 film) (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3106 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John McGuirk (2nd nomination) User:Setreis 16:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC) keep Current coverages passes Deletion of John McGuirk (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3107 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mijntje Lückerath-Rovers User:onel5969 12:31, 11 July 2018 (UTC) delete Doesn't meet , a single article with 280 cites over more than a decade, with the next highest citation count in the teens, does not appear to meet notability criteria, and nothing else in the article signifies any of the other qualities of NSCHOLAR have been met. And other than mere mentions, not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show they meet Deletion of Mijntje Lückerath-Rovers WP:NSCHOLAR||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3108 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanaz Alasti User:Green 08:49, 9 December 2012 (UTC) delete The subject doesn't appear to pass any criteria listed in or (or ). That leaves us with and the only independent reliable sources are the ones immediately above posted by IP 72.86.39.103 (New Yorker and Examiner mainly). My issue here is this is an academic and an author, yet can't meet those notability guidelines. We are trying to squeak an academic author under the GNG wire with a few sources that in total are not terribly strong. I couldn't even tell you why they are notable other than being from Iran and having a PhD (the book itself doesn't have multiple ''independent'' reviews per ). Others above have said she is notable for her views on the Death Penalty, or her controversial views (unstated what), but none of the provided sources really get into that, so it can't be verified. She seems to be a ''visible'' professional, and may be notable for Wikipedia someday, but doesn't seem to be there today, based on the available sources Deletion of Sanaz Alasti WP:AUTHOR||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3109 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Bosnar User:Sir 11:25, 29 August 2012 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Ivan Bosnar WP:GNG||WP:NSPORT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3110 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaali Khuhi User:Atlantic306 23:05, 1 November 2020 (UTC) keep as the film has now been released and has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources such as reviews by eight professional critics for publications such as First Post and Hindustan Times linked at Rotten Tomatoes so that is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view Deletion of Kaali Khuhi WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3111 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verity Price User:E 20:14, 11 January 2019 (UTC) delete appears to be PROMO for a nonnotable performer, fails , fails . Not to be confused with the Verity Price who shows prize Herefords https://www.crookwellgazette.com.au/story/3821022/spotlight-on-verity-price Deletion of Verity Price WP:MUSIC||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3112 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobil Directo User:Bearian 20:32, 23 October 2020 (UTC) delete per nom and . There were a few passing mentions in 1960s ''Mechanical Engineering''-type magazines, but zero coverage in text books or newspapers Deletion of Mobil Directo WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3113 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Level Up! Games User:Cabe6403 12:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC) keep """Per Turlo. Although some portions of the text appear to be marketing Hyperbole, e.g. """"With nearly eight years and a pioneer in the market, The Level Up! Games Brazil (sometimes abbreviated as LUG! Brazil) has..."""". I'd like to see these parts rewritten or removed to bring it back to """ Deletion of Level Up! Games WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +3114 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Kumar (artist) User:onel5969 13:54, 30 October 2018 (UTC) delete Does not pass . Agree with the rationale provided by Deletion of Deepak Kumar (artist) WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3115 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Typewriter Tape User:Esradekan 12:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC) delete article fails to establish notability per #Albums Deletion of The Typewriter Tape WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3116 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bus routes in Singapore User:Slakr 09:08, 20 December 2014 (UTC) delete """mdash; I was going to close this but I don't want my weekend marred by the inevitable DRV. Closing rationale: """"Strongest policy and guideline-based arguments given for deletion: #DIR|indiscriminate directory-style entries (NOT#DIR), |lack of notability (GNG). Strongest policy and guideline-based arguments given for retention: |verifiable () and |reliably sourced""" Deletion of List of bus routes in Singapore WP:NOT||WP:GNG||WP:V||WP:RS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3117 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plural verbs with Elohim as God User:Nsk92 14:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC) delete Looks like an |OR essay Deletion of Plural verbs with Elohim as God WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3118 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midfield quartet User:Govvy 11:59, 25 June 2021 (UTC) delete The whole article seems pointless and trivial, ? I agree with the main AfD assessment by Fram for deletion Deletion of Midfield quartet WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3119 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surf's Up! At Banzai Pipeline User:Hzh 13:21, 3 February 2019 (UTC) keep I can see the album discussed in https://books.google.com/books?id=MSFaAAAAYAAJ&dq=%22Surf%27s+Up%21+At+Banzai+Pipeline%22&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=%22Banzai+Pipeline%22https://books.google.com/books?id=Qq1AAQAAIAAJ&dq=%22Surf%27s+Up%21+At+Banzai+Pipeline%22&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=%22Surf%27s+Up%21+At+Banzai+Pipeline%22+, reviews in the http://www.pipelinemag.co.uk/ Pipeline magazine (issue 29 page 45) and http://www.reverbcentral.com/reviews/comp/surfs0881.html Reverb central. Not a great haul of sources, but it's worth noting that the album was released in 1963 (therefore archived sources on the internet are harder to find), but it was still discussed in the sources which include the 1973 Listener magazine (BBC, UK) and the 2008 book, multiple sources that suggest sustained interest in the album in the wider world, therefore passing and Deletion of Surf's Up! At Banzai Pipeline WP:NALBUM||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3120 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of literary works with eponymous heroes User:Axem 05:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC) delete per GassyGuy. He summed up my argument better than I did. Oh, and #IINFO, too Deletion of List of literary works with eponymous heroes WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3121 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaudencio Hernández Burgos User:Necrothesp 12:44, 14 May 2014 (UTC) keep Obviously meets the criteria of Deletion of Gaudencio Hernández Burgos WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3122 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grace Su [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']] 12:27, 6 February 2013 (UTC) delete it would seem most (if not all) of the sources are from sites like IMBD (not RS) and the subject's own website. I can't see significant coverage in reliable sources enough to meet Deletion of Grace Su WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3123 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shooting arm sleeve User:Hersfold 03:44, 25 July 2008 (UTC) delete """I'm not finding any reliable references for this, mostly sites trying to sell them, and I don't see that this is notable enough to be covered. """"Target for advertisement"""" isn't a reason for deletion in itself, but there's not enough context to maintain an encyclopedic article on this. Maybe redirect if an appropriate target can be found, but I see no reason for this to remain without some |significant work""" Deletion of Shooting arm sleeve WP:HEY Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard 85 +3124 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truck nuts User:Belovedfreak 16:33, 7 September 2007 (UTC) comment possible notability: an article in the Washington Post http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/22/AR2007022201426.html here. As the article is now, it's completely non-encyclopaedic and there is a |conflict of interest as the author appears to be, at the very least, the web designer for the product's site. http://www.thenutshop.com Deletion of Truck nuts WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +3125 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trump resistance User:Sławomir 12:04, 12 June 2017 (UTC) delete The present article exists solely as a POV-fork of Protests against Donald Trump. For context, see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trump_resistance&oldid=784103458 this revision of the article, which spectacularly fails . The current revision has had the gross policy failures mostly removed, but there is now no reasonable scope for a separate article Deletion of Trump resistance WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +3126 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Fischetti User:Less 12:26, 15 April 2021 (UTC) delete my has shown no coverage about the subject. Fails and Deletion of Mike Fischetti WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG||WP:ENT Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +3127 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Bengal the Real Power User:SabyaC 06:26, 21 February 2020 (UTC) keep The article passes with all the references listed in the article and also as a Supporters' groups|Supporters' group, the East Bengal the Real Power is India's first officially registered supporter's group who are in existence from 2006 and have been under media highlight for more than a decade. The article is encyclopedic and is relevant for Football in India Deletion of East Bengal the Real Power WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3128 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanessa McIntosh User:WarthogDemon 00:53, 13 July 2007 (UTC) comment That's not a legit arguement, see Deletion of Vanessa McIntosh WP:OTHERSTUFF Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +3129 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scientists for Future User:Matthiaspaul 21:26, 13 October 2019 (UTC) keep There are more than enough sources to fulfill , and many more could be brought by if necessary Deletion of Scientists for Future WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3130 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Lindsay (author) User:Pascal 01:22, 27 November 2006 (UTC) delete Unclear whether or not he meets but the page should be userfied and deleted. It is probably a good-faith mistake to have created the page in the first place. If it is not then we simply cannot tolerate autobiographical entries because of the underlying |conflict of interests Deletion of Chris Lindsay (author) WP:BIO||WP:COI Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3131 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Hegarty (Northern Irish footballer) (2nd nomination) User:GiantSnowman 12:17, 4 November 2012 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Chris Hegarty (Northern Irish footballer) (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3132 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Érin Geraghty User:Tim 06:54, 22 October 2018 (UTC) delete Though it is difficult to maintain that an article about an actor ''ipso facto'' breaches his or her privacy, I concur with the immediately preceding comment that the bulk of the citations do not conform to , and also that the notability of the performer is far from demonstrated. The statement that the article is materially inaccurate, though we are not told the details, is another reason to suggest to me that Wikipedia would do well to delete this article. I take all the points made above by Bakazaka, but on balance I think deletion is decidedly the best course Deletion of Érin Geraghty WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3133 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali in the Jungle User:Anarchia 11:43, 15 August 2007 (UTC) delete As the proposer argues, this song fails . It is a recently released song played by one group. There is nothing notable about it Deletion of Ali in the Jungle WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3134 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia car insurance requirements User:Kinu 01:24, 11 August 2012 (UTC) delete contravenes , no evidence that this is encyclopedic material Deletion of Georgia car insurance requirements WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3135 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How Many Times (Can We Say Goodbye?) User:Esradekan 11:36, 3 April 2008 (UTC) delete article fails to establish notability as per Deletion of How Many Times (Can We Say Goodbye?) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3136 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Teo User:XOR 15:27, 20 April 2018 (UTC) comment Not working in psychology myself, I'm not the best positioned to judge, but I suspect that Teo's corner of academia is a comparatively low-cited field, so his https://scholar.google.ca/citations?user=vNKpI-EAAAAJ&hl=en/ GS h-index of 18 might count substantially towards passing #C1. In addition, he https://www.theoreticalpsychology.org/journal edited the ''Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology'' (and remains a https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/teo/index.aspx?tab=2 consulting editor). Scopus ranks this journal in the https://www.scopus.com/sourceid/19500157012?origin=sbrowse#tabs=1 86th percentile of philosophy journals, citation-wise, so his editorship might count towards passing #C8. If kept, the article would definitely need de-promotionalization, but that's routine for academic biographies, and sources affiliated with the subject are considered acceptable for uncontroversial claims (e.g., where they attended school Deletion of Thomas Teo WP:PROF||WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3137 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sony PictureStation DPP-EX50 (2nd nomination) User:Mattg82 23:38, 7 December 2011 (UTC) delete Not a notable . Not possible to merge as no suitable article exists for it to merge to. This is one many hundreds or thousands of products that Sony make, I don't see how it can be merged into Sony Deletion of Sony PictureStation DPP-EX50 (2nd nomination) WP:PRODUCT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3138 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Kelly (Entrepreneur) User:Dom 17:23, 7 July 2020 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Peter Kelly (Entrepreneur) WP: NOTLINKEDIN Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3139 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/By Time User:Spada2 17:17, 6 May 2020 (UTC) delete not notable enough for Wikipedia, sources can not pass Deletion of By Time WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3140 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Swedish heat wave User:TheGracefulSlick 18:20, 22 July 2018 (UTC) delete Sourcing is great”...no, no it is not. The weather was reported on by the usual agencies at the time of its existence. That is not “great”, that is |routine. By the same logic, we must offer a daily weather report because, hey, the |some news agency reported it too Deletion of 2014 Swedish heat wave WP:ROUTINE||WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3141 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CoroCoro Comic User:Quasirandom 14:10, 3 September 2009 (UTC) keep Even without evidences of discussion, the magazine that initially serialized ''Doraemon'' and ''Pokemon'', among other important works, is clearly notable in some way. Do we have enough |snow falling yet Deletion of CoroCoro Comic WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +3142 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia United States Senate election, 2010 User:Otto4711 13:27, 28 October 2007 (UTC) delete until such time as there is maybe a declared candidate. At the very least the list of potential candidates needs to be deleted as Deletion of Georgia United States Senate election, 2010 WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3143 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kurt Holobaugh (2nd nomination) User:Papaursa 02:41, 19 November 2015 (UTC) delete Doesn't meet and the coverage consists on routine reporting of results so is not met Deletion of Kurt Holobaugh (2nd nomination) WP:NMMA||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3144 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krayola (Timesplitters) User:Yom 05:57, 11 July 2006 (UTC) delete forgot I had that game. Fails , however. &mdash Deletion of Krayola (Timesplitters) WP:FICT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3145 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lozar User:Cunard 23:13, 7 July 2009 (UTC) delete per the http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&q=Lozar+Veles&cf=all lack of |reliable sources Deletion of Lozar WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3146 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singapore gay portrayals on television User:Leidiot 14:14, 3 March 2006 (UTC) delete As per Deletion of Singapore gay portrayals on television WP:NOR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3147 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilltop festival User:Coredesat 05:41, 3 July 2006 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Hilltop festival WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3148 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RJ Dheena User:TheCrazedBeast 14:31, 23 December 2016 (UTC) delete Does not meet Deletion of RJ Dheena WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3149 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Similarities between the Bible and the Qur'an (2 nomination) User:Masaruemoto 04:36, 16 October 2007 (UTC) delete This is , even if the conclusions are correct. This needs to have reliable sources discussing these similarities, which was mentioned by several people in the previous AFD, but 10 months later those sources haven't been added Deletion of Similarities between the Bible and the Qur'an (2 nomination) WP:SYNTH Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3150 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kigo (Kim Possible) User:NeoChaosX 03:17, 1 January 2007 (UTC) delete as failing for being fanfiction Deletion of Kigo (Kim Possible) WP:FICTION Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3151 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doyle (Andromeda) User:Sgeureka 08:06, 1 September 2010 (UTC) merge to List of Andromeda characters. No established , and it is short enough to neatly fit in the LoC. &ndash Deletion of Doyle (Andromeda) WP:NOTABILITY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3152 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fisciculture User:Northamerica1000 01:59, 5 September 2012 (UTC) delete """per . Redirect to Fish farming {{spaced ndash}} The definition of Fisciculture in the article is entirely incorrect, and is almost certainly original research. However, this is an actual term regarding the distribution and locating of fish by humans. Here are some source examples: http://udn.lib.utah.edu/cdm/compoundobject/collection/deseretnews6/id/401690/show/401782/rec/1 From 1889 CE, http://www.archive.org/stream/transactionsamer03ameruoft/transactionsamer03ameruoft_djvu.txt From 1874 CE. It appears that in contemporary times, """"Fisciculture"""" is not used very often, with """"Pisciculture"""" being the more common contemporary usage. Also, """"Pisciculture"""" currently redirects to the Fish farming article""" Deletion of Fisciculture WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +3153 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herbert Harrison Mercer User:MelanieN 21:27, 30 May 2016 (UTC) delete Absolutely nothing is |verified. In particular, the claim that he was involved in the creation of the flag of the Republic of Brazil is contradicted by our article Flag of Brazil Deletion of Herbert Harrison Mercer WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3154 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MTV Generation (2nd nomination) User:RichyBoy 13:47, 8 September 2007 (UTC) keep The phrase 'MTV Generation' is just as well known and comparable to phrases such as the Swinging Sixties - they are phrases which capture the zeitgeist. However the article absolutely must be re-written as without in-line citations the article is partly a |synthesis and comprises |original research. Also, there is absolutely no-way an article like this is a candidate for speedy deletion Deletion of MTV Generation (2nd nomination) WP:SYN||WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3155 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Epicureans User:Sjakkalle 08:20, 27 September 2005 (UTC) delete no evidence of having passed Deletion of The Epicureans WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3156 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheila Crowley (2nd nomination) User:Redditaddict69 05:28, 14 August 2018 (UTC) delete Former acting director and failed candidate for office. No notability whatsoever per , nor POL Deletion of Sheila Crowley (2nd nomination) WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3157 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HKFYG Lee Shau Kee College User:The 15:29, 17 August 2013 (UTC) keep Experience shows that, with enough research, sources can almost invariably be found for high schools that meet . We must avoid systemic bias and allow time for local and Chinese language sources to be investigated Deletion of HKFYG Lee Shau Kee College WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3158 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddy Willems (2nd nomination) User:Boleyn 20:08, 15 August 2017 (UTC) comment So this article was created by {{u|GGGTeam}} (), then the other main contributors were {{u|G Kindermans}} and {{u|WikieWikie}} (also s). {{u|LiverpoolLorry}} made a handful of edits in 2011, then nothing until this AfD 6 years later. I am doubtful about both commenters above (or the same?) I'm calling . And the G Kindermans who has commented above is presumably Guy Kindermans, senior staff writer on Willems' blog http://eddywillems.blogspot.co.uk/2007/02/. Any needs to be clearly stated Deletion of Eddy Willems (2nd nomination) WP:SPA||WP:SPA||WP:DUCK||WP:COI Wikipedia:Single-purpose account 21 +3159 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deadbird User:wknight94 15:37, 28 January 2006 (UTC) delete Non-notable band that has only released one album which doesn't meet the standard of two full-length albums on major labels. Only the one album on Amazon and Allmusic. Listed for speedy but admin sent it here Deletion of Deadbird WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3160 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Jahnke User:Punkmorten 12:59, 10 February 2009 (UTC) delete many news hits, but fails Deletion of Martin Jahnke WP:ONEEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3161 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sima Abd Rabo User:JamalFaris 03:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC) keep including per and the points raised by Deletion of Sima Abd Rabo WP:IAR Wikipedia:Ignore all rules 63 +3162 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sako Chivitchian User:Sepulwiki 12:54, 22 December 2012 (UTC) keep Meets Deletion of Sako Chivitchian WP:NMMA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3163 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halfling (Dungeons & Dragons) User:Rorshacma 13:54, 13 March 2020 (UTC) merge to Halfling - I initially was going to suggest a selective merge, per Hog Farm, as I felt that the existence of the D&D Halflings and the legal issues regarding how they came about their names was worth a mention there. But, I see that it already ''is'', and as there is nothing else in the article except for primary-sourced game info, I don't really see much else that would really need to be merged. At the very least, this is an unnecessary , I would say. A Redirect would leave its history intact, in the case that others felt that there was other information worth merging Deletion of Halfling (Dungeons & Dragons) WP:SPLIT Wikipedia:Splitting 82 +3164 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maha el-Samnah (2nd nomination) User:E 18:12, 19 July 2017 (UTC) merge and selectively merge to Khadr family. Really, there is very little her to support notability; heavily oversourced; noclear claim to notability. lacking . Many sources merely mention this woman in article about her family, others are from minor, perhaps unreliable sources Deletion of Maha el-Samnah (2nd nomination) WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3165 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armed Recordings User:LakesideMiners 13:27, 21 November 2018 (UTC) delete so promotional. This looks like it could be tagged with Deletion of Armed Recordings WP:G11 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +3166 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azure Flame User:SkierRMH 08:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC) delete per , smells like a 'lets use Wikipedia for advertismnet' ploy Deletion of Azure Flame WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3167 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Ford User:Agent 22:52, 27 September 2006 (UTC) keep I agree with Fram that notability by association ''in and of itself'' is insufficient; however, in this case, the subject of the article meets the criteria of on her own merits Deletion of Susan Ford WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3168 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boyd Crowder User:Shooterwalker 14:54, 25 July 2010 (UTC) merge could not of this topic but I am ok with a merge as a compromise. Would a non-admin closure be fine in this case since the nominator is also ready to merge Deletion of Boyd Crowder WP:VERIFYNOTABILITY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3169 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myra Greene User:MichaelQSchmidt 04:01, 26 November 2008 (UTC) keep per meeting the |general notability guidelines Deletion of Myra Greene WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3170 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Coyle User:AbsolutDan 19:17, 1 July 2006 (UTC) delete per nom. It appears to be a |vanity article too Deletion of Andy Coyle WP:VANITY Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +3171 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UK and US counting units User:Minimac 05:47, 26 December 2014 (UTC) delete these look like a list of #DICT|dictionary definitions collected onto the same article Deletion of UK and US counting units WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3172 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexpressionism User:Doczilla 07:07, 8 January 2007 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Sexpressionism WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3173 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham & Straus User:Fuhghettaboutit 22:24, 19 March 2007 (UTC) keep """This is an {{tl|unreferenced}} maintenance tag issue, not a deletion issue. I haven't bothered to check yet because I happen to know they were a massive outlet akin to JC Penny, but will source in a few minutes. To cite : """"this policy should not be used to cause disruption by removing material for which reliable sources could easily or reasonably be found"""" or at : """"consider...adding a """"cleanup"""" template, instead of bringing the article to AfD""" Deletion of Abraham & Straus WP:ATT||WP:AFD Wikipedia:Attribution 34 +3174 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teairra Mari's Forthcoming Studio Album User:Kanonkas 12:07, 3 August 2008 (UTC) delete The article fails and Deletion of Teairra Mari's Forthcoming Studio Album WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NOR Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3175 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tango en Tres User:Gm545 12:10, 2 January 2014 (UTC) delete Completely unsourced and even if it wasn't, there's nothing sufficient enough to make it past Deletion of Tango en Tres WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3176 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of University of Manitoba alumni User:OlEnglish 18:03, 16 February 2011 (UTC) keep Looks like someone needs to review point #4 in Deletion of List of University of Manitoba alumni WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +3177 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nostradamus (album) User:RC 03:36, 13 March 2008 (UTC) delete per . '''''Special:Contributions/RC-0722|K Deletion of Nostradamus (album) WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3178 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mercedes Benz SA codes User:Gnfnrf 18:04, 30 September 2008 (UTC) delete as only useful in the context of a how-to guide, and therefore per #HOWTO Deletion of Mercedes Benz SA codes WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3179 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kranuan F.C. User:Fenix 11:20, 12 September 2017 (UTC) delete fails , has not participated in a national competition. Not seeing any indication of wider GNG ad would not expect to see much more than |routine match reporting for a club playing in a low level regional league Deletion of Kranuan F.C. WP:FOOTYN||WP:MILL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3180 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Martin Petcare User:Shoessss 14:58, 5 January 2009 (UTC) keep A company that holds in excess of 25% of the pet care industry in the UK, as shown here, http://www.alacrastore.com/storecontent/markintel/DATAMONITOR-50128256, is pretty otable|notable to me. Likewise, did you do a quick Google News search? I was able to find multiple sources as shown here, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Bob+Martin%22+Pet+Care&sa=N&start=20. Overall, I think it is a keeper Deletion of Bob Martin Petcare WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3181 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journey (film series) User:Betty 00:09, 9 May 2013 (UTC) delete """It seems to me we really wouldn't be losing much. I don't think anyone would dispute that two films constitute a """"series"""", the question is what unique perspective can such an article offer by comparing just two films? As Erik points out articles about sequels compare them to the predecessor anyway, and elaborate on which actors reprised their roles etc, so the sequel article as rule covers the same ground as the series article. It's difficult to envisage what would go into this article that shouldn't go into Journey 2: The Mysterious Island. Series with three films have an inherent complexity that series with two films don't have: for a start each film can be compared to two other films, as opposed to just two films compared with each other; rather than just having some actors returning and others not like with a single sequel, you often have recurring actors throughout a series, so a series article is the best way of tracking who has appeared in what. The third film does complicate this to an extent, but if we abide strictly by then the third film isn't eligible for an article yet; speculation about the sequel can simply go in the ''Journey 2'' article as well""" Deletion of Journey (film series) WP:NFF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3182 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Caldwell (programmer) User:RFerreira 07:20, 2 December 2007 (UTC) keep agree wholeheartedly that is not grounds for deletion, just better policing of the article Deletion of Christopher Caldwell (programmer) WP:AUTO Wikipedia:Autobiography 75 +3183 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theological hermeneutics User:RJC 03:55, 2 August 2010 (UTC) merge with Qur'anic hermeneutics. As I said under my comment above, I don't think that we can discuss all of the various hermeneutical methods side-by-side without running afoul of or , even if this would be an interesting article. Dab pages are for articles that could in principle have the same name, which is not true of Talmudical, Biblical, and Islamic hermeneutics. Whoever performs the merge should make sure that this article does not redirect toward the new one Deletion of Theological hermeneutics WP:NPOV||WP:NOR Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +3184 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Am Also a Human User:Alexandermcnabb 13:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC) delete compelling plot summary apart, this fails . Best Deletion of I Am Also a Human WP:NAUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3185 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Killed My Lesbian Wife, Hung Her on a Meat Hook, and Now I Have a Three-Picture Deal at Disney User:MichaelQSchmidt 10:16, 12 September 2017 (UTC) keep this silly & bad short film per meeting inclusion criteria of . We'd love to have even more, but I believe coverage by http://ew.com/article/2013/02/21/ben-affleck-i-killed-my-lesbian-wife/ ''Entertainment Weekly'' http://www.slashfilm.com/watch-ben-afflecks-atrocious-directorial-debut-i-killed-my-lesbian-wife-hung-her-on-a-meat-hook-and-now-i-have-a-three-picture-deal-at-disney/ ''SlashFilm'',https://filmschoolrejects.com/watch-ben-afflecks-embarrassing-directorial-debut-from-1993-943909a1c74/ ''Film School Rejects'', http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/risky-business/ben-afflecks-i-killed-my-422734 ''Hollywood Reporter'', http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Watch-Ben-Affleck-Debut-Directorial-Short-I-Killed-My-Lesbian-Wife-35849.html ''Cinemablend'', http://news.avclub.com/ben-affleck-made-a-movie-called-i-killed-my-lesbian-wi-1798236481 ''AV Club'', https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2013/02/watch-early-ben-affleck-directed-short-film-i-kill.html ''Paste'', and http://www.eonline.com/news/819115/ben-affleck-has-come-a-long-way-since-i-killed-my-lesbian-wife ''E-Online'' are enough Deletion of I Killed My Lesbian Wife, Hung Her on a Meat Hook, and Now I Have a Three-Picture Deal at Disney WP:NF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3186 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nostradamus ni Kiite Miro♪ User:SeizureDog 13:44, 2 December 2006 (UTC) keep Are you people even actually looking at the article? The game has both an official website ''and'' has been the cover story for a magazine, I haven't speculated about this game at all and made no original research. |Crystal balling refers to making articles on games without official annoucements that they will be released, such as a ''Metroid Prime 5''. ''Metroid Prime 3'' however, is annouced and in development as is ''Nostradamus ni Kiite Miro♪''. Furthermore, it is being produced by one of the most respectable publishers of visual novels, and is a notable game in Japan (as evident of it having an article on the Japanese Wikipedia). And I don't see how it falls under at all Deletion of Nostradamus ni Kiite Miro♪ WP:CRYSTAL||WP:SPAM Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3187 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kresten Bjerg User:Theroadislong 23:48, 27 November 2015 (UTC) delete Clearly fails and doesn't appear to meet any of the 9 Specific criteria notes at otability (academics Deletion of Kresten Bjerg WP:GNG||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3188 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of current Indian Super League players User:Ajf773 02:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC) delete as and . Possibly mirrored from another source Deletion of List of current Indian Super League players WP:LISTCRUFT||WP:LISTN Wikipedia:Listcruft 66 +3189 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Black Eyed Peas forthcoming album User:Esradekan 18:59, 31 July 2008 (UTC) delete per , and all those other ones we quote from in times like these. Good on ya TPH Deletion of The Black Eyed Peas forthcoming album WP:HAMMER Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law 11 +3190 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Griffiths (British Army officer) User:Barney 22:09, 25 May 2014 (UTC) comment I am somewhat sympathetic to having an article on this individual. Two MCs on active service are not insignificant; there is no doubt a story to tell, and he does seem to have been a pioneer of tank warfare. isn't generally a helpful notability guideline. However, I would have expected information for when he was commissioned and promoted (from the Gazette), and where and when information for the the MCs, and the author to have checked the regimental histories for the Royal Tank Regiment, and constructed something from that. There is much to be said for writing your articles properly Deletion of Arthur Griffiths (British Army officer) WP:SOLDIER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3191 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/COEBA User:Stifle 11:38, 1 March 2006 (UTC) delete """as """"Wikipedia is the only """"reference info."""" source fortunate enough to provide info on this shift/change as it happens."""" Wikipedia is not a primary source, therefore this is |unverifiable""" Deletion of COEBA WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3192 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Alexander (1982- ) User:Dhartung 10:30, 27 July 2007 (UTC) delete fails . Insufficient attribution of notability to independent third parties Deletion of James Alexander (1982- ) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3193 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arungundram User:Curbon7 06:15, 14 August 2021 (UTC) keep Per , I believe this is a legally recognized village: https://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/DCHB_A/33/3304_PART_A_DCHB_VELLORE.pdf per the 2011 Indian census for the Vellore district, under the name Arunkundram. Took me a while to find since the district this was in was split in 2019 Deletion of Arungundram WP:GEOLAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3194 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koo-Koo and Luke User:Adrian 03:48, 11 February 2006 (UTC) delete as |non-notable web comic Deletion of Koo-Koo and Luke WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3195 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dude User:Hersfold 01:49, 10 March 2008 (UTC) keep This is considerably more than a dicdef. I'm not sure it'll get much longer, but we don't delete stubs for being stubs. Only reason I'm not ing this is because there seem to be some questions about inclusion, but I'm sure this is snowable Deletion of Dude WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +3196 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darker Prisons User:Jclemens 17:19, 16 September 2008 (UTC) delete fails rather badly Deletion of Darker Prisons WP:BK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3197 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Not for Sale (organization) User:Rhododendrites 15:10, 25 November 2015 (UTC) keep Passes . http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michelle-s-melendez/not-for-sale-nonprofit_b_1917561.html Huffington Post, http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2012/10/09/meet-the-nonprofit-helping-the-white-house-stop-human-trafficking U.S. News & World Report, http://www.latimes.com/sports/dodgers/dodgersnow/la-sp-dn-dodgers-adrian-gonzalez-joins-effort-to-combat-human-trafficking-20150612-story.html LA Times, http://www.forbes.com/sites/kareanderson/2014/02/21/how-exactly-can-we-accomplish-greater-things-together/ Forbes, http://oaklandlocal.com/2014/11/the-new-social-network-local-organizations-diminishing-modern-slavery/ Oakland Local, http://mashable.com/2012/07/10/not-for-sale-modern-slavery/ Mashable, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mark-wexler/a-new-way-to-fight-modern_b_7912230.html Huffington Post again, http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304071004579407452025492322 Wall Street Journal on their coworking space, http://www.theguardian.com/social-enterprise-network/2014/jan/14/modern-slavery-social-enterprise-solution The Guardian... &mdash Deletion of Not for Sale (organization) WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3198 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Joseph Harrington User:Iridescenti 17:04, 11 April 2007 (UTC) delete if the best argument even the ''subject of the article'' can make for keeping this is this is unsalvageable Deletion of Matthew Joseph Harrington WP:WAX Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +3199 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jegulja User:Kraxler 00:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC) delete non-notable band, no chart positions, no coverage, the sources are blogs, trivial mentions and primary pieces, fails all criteria of Deletion of Jegulja WP:NBAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3200 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drew Caylor [[User talk:204.126.132.231|talk]]) 18:45, 26 March 2014 (UTC) delete Fails and .Special:Contributions/204.126.132.231|204.126.132.231 Deletion of Drew Caylor WP:NGRIDIRON||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3201 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marek Stachowski (linguist) User:David 22:05, 17 November 2012 (UTC) delete I can't find evidence that his journal is a major one of the type that would pass #C8, or that he passes any other criterion Deletion of Marek Stachowski (linguist) WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3202 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Almshouse Road (road in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, USA) User:Imzadi1979 21:59, 17 October 2016 (UTC) delete as a failure to meet for an independent topic. Assuming ''ad arguendo'' for a moment that this were retained, the title would need to be simplified, and the prose would need to be fixed to comply with the expectations of encyclopedic writing style Deletion of Almshouse Road (road in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, USA) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3203 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russell (locomotive) User:Gwernol 02:30, 16 January 2008 (UTC) keep I've added three references to |published sources discussing ''Russell'', and I have a slew more which I will add. The three references should be enough on their own, I know of at least half a dozen more. This is an easily verifiable subject. The article would bear some improvements though Deletion of Russell (locomotive) WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3204 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of centenarians User:Stifle 08:27, 16 October 2008 (UTC) delete arbitrary list. See items 1, 7, and 10 Deletion of List of centenarians WP:LC Wikipedia:Listcruft 66 +3205 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tariq Mahmud Naim User:Kmzayeem 16:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC) delete fails . No significant coverage in reliable sources Deletion of Tariq Mahmud Naim WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3206 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Hamley user:Andrew 10:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC) keep """It's quite easy to find more sources such as http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/cornwall/hi/people_and_places/history/newsid_8710000/8710901.stm this. Per . """"''If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page""" Deletion of William Hamley WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +3207 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Mahtab Alam User:TheAafi 14:45, 19 July 2021 (UTC) delete I cleaned up the article and there's nothing that helps in establishing notability, if we try for , because it fails GNG at the first instance. Weird advert piece Deletion of Mohammad Mahtab Alam WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3208 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InTouch Messenger User:Dialectric 05:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC) delete software article of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage. Refs provided are download links and an incidental mention, and a search failed to turn up any further RS coverage Deletion of InTouch Messenger WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3209 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lars Vilks Muhammad drawings controversy User:Fnagaton 23:38, 29 October 2007 (UTC) keep mdash; Reproducing the images for the purposes of creating an article about this notable subject is not inappropriate. This user has a history of trying to censor the images based on his point of view without wanting to seriously talk about his changes first. For example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Lars_Vilks_Muhammad_drawings_controversy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Techana. The article itself operates within as far as I can see and does not present bias. The images are certainly notable enough and pass erifiability Deletion of Lars Vilks Muhammad drawings controversy WP:NPOV||WP:V Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +3210 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TorrentUs User:onel5969 02:22, 3 November 2015 (UTC) delete as per nom and above editors. Searches did not turn up anything to show the article passes Deletion of TorrentUs WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3211 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heidi Sorenson User:Carrite 14:25, 4 May 2011 (UTC) keep """The use of automated tools for mass deletions should not be allowed against large blocks of articles which have already been patrolled at New Pages. It is, simply put, a violation of — due diligence is not being done when these tools are being used in this way. """"Shoot them all and let the saps at AfD sort them out,"""" is apparently the line of thinking. While I am personally sympathetic to the idea of a very high bar for so-called """"Porn Bios,"""" this blasting of 100 articles at the rate of 1 per minute, judging from the time logs, is not conducive to the spirit or practice of AfD. It is putting DON'T LIKE IT ahead of the established article deletion process and is disrespectful both to the work of article creators and those of us who volunteer our time at AfD. We have seen similar automated mass annihilation efforts recently against modern Trotskyist political organizations and against fraternities and sororities. The net result of these efforts was a lot of lost time by article creators and AfD participants and a lot of lost information from those articles annihilated as part of these campaigns. Meanwhile, the backlog of crap at New Pages festers. Something needs to be done about this problem. Mine is not a unique view — see Wikipedia:ANI#Massive_number_of_Playboy-related_AFD_nominations_by_a_single_user at ANI. We need to keep them all as a matter of principle and ban the future use of automated tools in this way. ''This argument will be copied-and-pasted in the debate sections for all automated AfDs of this campaign""" Deletion of Heidi Sorenson WP:BEFORE||WP:I Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +3212 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soc.history.what-if (2nd nomination) User:Action 20:20, 4 July 2007 (UTC) delete while generally well-written, the group seems to have no particular |encyclopedic merit, and the vast majority of content of the article belongs elsewhere - perhaps on a S.H.W-I FAQ site, or textfiles.org Deletion of Soc.history.what-if (2nd nomination) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3213 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dezfoolian User:Edison 18:39, 6 May 2009 (UTC) delete """Wikipedia is |not a directory of every """"semi-common surname."""" Fails |notability as well""" Deletion of Dezfoolian WP:NOT||WP:N Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3214 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ho Chiu Yeng User:Eggishorn 14:54, 20 December 2017 (UTC) delete The article re-creator has asked for my opinion via my talk page but did not ask for a specific opinion, making this borderline canvassing. Given the abundance of bad faith editing connected with this topic, they clearly hoped I would !vote for keep. They are going to be disappointed. I see nothing in the article or the sources provided here (including what Google Translate can help me make of the Chinese ones) that substantiates qualification. The significant sources are not independent and the independent sources are not significantly about the article subject. The latter category is mostly about other subjects to which this subject is connected through family ties Deletion of Ho Chiu Yeng WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3215 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitchell Bailey User:Bearian 00:48, 1 October 2017 (UTC) delete based on the analysis by nom and the well-respected Canadian {{U|Bearcat}}. This article is barely more than |spam Deletion of Mitchell Bailey WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Spam 26 +3216 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. L. Hall User:Lizard 04:34, 27 May 2017 (UTC) keep No valid rationale given. Article appears to pass http://www.macon.com/sports/article89216707.htmlhttp://highschoolsports.blog.ajc.com/2017/03/28/valdosta-lefty-hall-heads-list-of-georgias-top-10-baseball-prospects/http://www.baseballamerica.com/draft/dl-hall-shines-east-coast-pro/#UTLH4oy9w37t7tiq.97 and there are plenty of articles on high school baseball players; see 2017 Major League Baseball draft#Prospects Deletion of D. L. Hall WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3217 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Copeland (mayor) User:Piotrus 05:34, 14 May 2019 (UTC) delete """Mayor of the 4th biggest city in Kansas... but mayors are not-auto-notable. says """"Mayors of cities of at least regional prominence have usually survived AFD, although the article should say more than just """"Jane Doe is the mayor of Cityville"""". Mayors of smaller towns, however, are generally deemed not notable just for being mayors"""". Wellm is the 4th biggest city in Kansas a city of """"at least regional prominence""""? Debatable, but the current two-line stub and no indication of anything but local coverage/job blurb suggest there is nothing to warrant a separate article. My current suggestion is to ensure that the city he is a mayor in has a referenced list of mayors, and that's it - if all they'd get in their bio is 'he is a mayor... and he lives in his city', sorry, that's not enough. Ping me if better sources are found and more content can be added""" Deletion of Michael Copeland (mayor) WP:POLOUTCOMES Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +3218 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Yay User:Bakazaka 07:06, 16 August 2018 (UTC) delete WP:COI and issues, repeated recreation after admin intervention, not to mention that the article creator blanked the AfD nominator's user page Deletion of Little Yay WP:PROMO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3219 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manimala Girls High School User:Mkdw 09:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC) keep Nomination has failed to show how this case-by-case look at this school is any different than Deletion of Manimala Girls High School WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +3220 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millenia Malls User:Pmedema 17:30, 17 April 2008 (UTC) delete It may pass but fails . The article may be |looking into a crystal ball but that's inconclusive Deletion of Millenia Malls WP:N||WP:RS||WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3221 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Achyutanand singh User:Necrothesp 14:42, 25 February 2015 (UTC) keep Notable per Deletion of Achyutanand singh WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3222 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Morin User:Stifle 01:11, 6 May 2006 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Emmanuel Morin WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +3223 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Himo User:Elmssuper 06:26, 4 December 2020 (UTC) delete Doesn’t come close to meeting , let alone Deletion of Himo WP:NCORP||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3224 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohit Ugale (2nd nomination) User:Georgetgeorge 17:25, 3 September 2021 (UTC) keep The person is notable and has featured in many news and magazines. One of the independent sources I found is here https://www.outlookindia.com/website/story/outlook-spotlight-big-day-for-rohit-ugale-young-businessman-award-at-international-glory-awards-by-sonu-sood/393499 and easily passes Deletion of Rohit Ugale (2nd nomination) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3225 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get Licensed User:HighKing 13:55, 7 June 2018 (UTC) delete Agree with nom, topic fails GNG and Deletion of Get Licensed WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3226 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. W. MacKenzie User:Nsk92 16:58, 31 May 2010 (UTC) delete No evidence of passing . Scant citability, no significant academic awards mentioned, no journal editorships and nothing else in the record to show satisfying Deletion of D. W. MacKenzie WP:PROF||WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3227 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Mourdock pregnancy from rape Is 'something god intended' controversy User:Érico 02:49, 25 October 2012 (UTC) keep It makes no sense to keep Todd Akin 'legitimate rape' and pregnancy comment controversy, and delete this page; and Deletion of Richard Mourdock pregnancy from rape Is 'something god intended' controversy WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3228 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor Jekill User:Jarkeld 14:45, 21 March 2010 (UTC) delete As per nominator: fails Deletion of Doctor Jekill WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3229 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockajazz User:Coredesat 04:06, 30 June 2006 (UTC) delete non-notable neologism, fails Deletion of Rockajazz WP:NOR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3230 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CHICKENMAN User:Kinu 21:44, 15 December 2006 (UTC) delete WP:NOT a memorial, does not otherwise meet based on Deletion of CHICKENMAN WP:BIO||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3231 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Living Word Fellowship (4th nomination) User:Baileypalblue 15:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC) keep """Satisfies the notability requirements of , which says: """"Organizations whose activities are local in scope may be notable where there is verifiable information from reliable independent sources outside the organization's local area."""" The ''People'' magazine article and Ruth Tucker book cited satisfy this requirement""" Deletion of The Living Word Fellowship (4th nomination) WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3232 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preston King (academic) User:David 00:50, 16 January 2013 (UTC) keep I think there are enough in-depth sources on him to pass . I did some cleanups to the article, enough I think to demonstrate notability — it still needs a lot more, and Barney Barney Barney's stubbornness in insisting that it's ok as it is isn't helpful, but AfD isn't for cleanup Deletion of Preston King (academic) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3233 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epileptic Gaming (2nd nomination) User:Tivedshambo 21:24, 31 March 2009 (UTC) comment but feel it fair to point out that the nominator is also a |single purpose account —  Deletion of Epileptic Gaming (2nd nomination) WP:SPA Wikipedia:Single-purpose account 21 +3234 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ruby Yacht User:DarkGlow 10:09, 11 November 2020 (UTC) delete non-notable story arc. Per , an article for an episode should only be created once articles for the programme and its seasons are created, ''then'' notable episodes Deletion of The Ruby Yacht WP:EPISODE Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +3235 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vernon Hargreaves III User:X96lee15 17:32, 19 March 2014 (UTC) keep I'm usually all about voting delete on run-of-the-mill BCS players, but it appears this one is notable (best HS cornerback, first-team SEC as frosh) per Deletion of Vernon Hargreaves III WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3236 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wei Hang Flight 252 User:JohnCD 14:18, 14 May 2016 (UTC) delete """This is not a hoax. """"Wei Hang"""" is the Chinese name for """"V Air"""", and I have found http://avherald.com/h?article=497f811c a source for this incident. However, with no fatalities and no damage, it is certainly not |notable enough for an article""" Deletion of Wei Hang Flight 252 WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3237 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torre Futura User:Oakshade 03:37, 3 May 2010 (UTC) keep """Sure the article needs expansion and improvement, but that's what expansion and improvement tags are for. This topic in fact has received very significant coverage from reliable sources like La Prensa Gráfica and El Diario de Hoy http://www.laprensagrafica.com/economia/nacional/76814-agrisal-tiene-mas-proyectos-en-torno-a-torre-futura.htmlhttp://www.elsalvador.com/mwedh/nota/nota_completa.asp?idCat=6374&idArt=4298472http://www.laprensagrafica.com/el-salvador/lodeldia/76660-hoy-inauguran-torre-futura.htmlhttp://www.laprensagrafica.com/economia/nacional/73151-torre-futura-ya-tiene-ocupado-un-75-de-su-area-corporativa.html (these are just a few of the many I found), thus easily satisfying . And the nom simply stating """"Failure to meet """" with absolutely no argument as to why they feel that way gives the impression they want the article deleted for unknown reasons""" Deletion of Torre Futura WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3238 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/System wars User:Capitalistroadster 16:48, 9 December 2005 (UTC) delete as another piece of Internet forum navelgazing with no reference to Deletion of System wars WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3239 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davide Petrucci (2nd nomination) User:GiantSnowman 21:13, 3 March 2009 (UTC) delete per nom; player still fails . Recreate when/if becomes notable Deletion of Davide Petrucci (2nd nomination) WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3240 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Maryott User:Bearcat 11:28, 20 June 2020 (UTC) delete """without prejudice against recreation on or after election day if he wins. People do not get articles just for being candidates in elections they have not yet won — requires ''holding'' a notable office, not just running for one — but being mayor of a small town in the 33K population range is not """"inherently"""" notable either, so that doesn't get him over the """"preexisting notability for other reasons independent of the candidacy"""" test, and the depth of media coverage shown here is nowhere near enough to get him over the """"his candidacy is more special than everybody else's candidacies"""" test either. But we also don't keep articles about candidates in draftspace ''pending'' the election results, either, because that just turns ''draftspace'' into the repository of campaign brochures for unelected candidates that our rules were intentionally designed to prevent mainspace from becoming. If he wins in November, administrators have the ability to undelete the article at that time with one punch on one button, so """"don't lose the work because he might win"""" is not a compelling reason to waive our rules""" Deletion of Brian Maryott WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3241 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Owen Webb User:power 02:53, 20 June 2018 (UTC) delete and procedurally blocking a speedy-keep withdrawal) Simply being a chair of a university department is not an automatic pass of . I don't see sufficient coverage to meet GNG, and the existing article doesn't demonstrate to me that NPROF is met; I also don't see enough in a Google Scholar search Deletion of Mark Owen Webb WP:NPROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3242 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyberconfidence User:Ihcoyc 14:29, 19 August 2011 (UTC) delete """Seems to be a vacuous |neologism for network security. Chief purpose of the page seems to be to drum up traffic for a """"csc.com"""" website, which is where most of the """"references"""" end up. The others are a snow job: you will look in vain for the word """"cyberconfidence"""" in the linked Forbes and New York Times articles. Obviously a |promotional insertion""" Deletion of Cyberconfidence WP:NEO||WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +3243 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberto Jacoby User:Snotbot 19:22, 15 April 2012 (UTC) comment This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (|step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 April 15 Deletion of Roberto Jacoby WP:AFDHOWTO Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +3244 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legion of Doom (Batman: The Brave and the Bold) User:AdamBMorgan 17:59, 26 January 2010 (UTC) delete as , even if there is a formal grouping (which I don't think has been established) they could easily use any number of original or established names (Injustice League, Crime Syndicate etc). It could serve as a list of villains on the show but that is already covered by List of characters in Batman: The Brave and the Bold#Villains Deletion of Legion of Doom (Batman: The Brave and the Bold) WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3245 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Haggerty & The Wanted User:Jayden54 14:27, 4 January 2007 (UTC) delete not notable per Deletion of Steve Haggerty & The Wanted WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3246 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatjon Tafaj User:GiantSnowman 10:08, 15 August 2012 (UTC) delete fail and Deletion of Fatjon Tafaj WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3247 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Akiniymika User:Papaursa 01:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC) delete She's not come close to meeting . According to a link in the aritcle, her current world ranking in the 200m is 320th. Coverage appears to be routine sports reporting and is insufficient to meet Deletion of Jennifer Akiniymika WP:NATH||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3248 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Cotter User:PRehse 08:58, 1 August 2015 (UTC) delete As per nominator. This is essentially an advert and does not meet . The first reference which is the only one that discusses the subject is a subject written advert Deletion of Steve Cotter WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3249 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britain's Got Talent User:Magnus 21:19, 13 May 2007 (UTC) delete Per Deletion of Britain's Got Talent WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3250 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daddy, What's a Train? User:Chiswick 15:22, 31 March 2019 (UTC) delete https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Daddy,+What%27s+a+Train%3F%22+-wikipedia+-youtube+-shop+-store+review&ei=2dqgXPCPKYPhxgOHhZjIBQ&start=60&sa=N&ved=0ahUKEwiw4I-b16zhAhWDsHEKHYcCBlk4WhDy0wMIOw&biw=1235&bih=873 a search finds almost no critical coverage, and unsurprisingly there's no indication of notability in the article either, so this does not meet Deletion of Daddy, What's a Train? WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3251 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Miller (wrestler) User:MER 06:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Mike Miller (wrestler) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3252 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pradip Kumar Singh User:Randykitty 18:51, 15 July 2014 (UTC) delete """Yes, Singh has published a few books and some papers, as DGG notes. However, as says, it is not enough to publish, all academics publish. What is needed is evidence that these publications have been noted, which we usually assess by looking at how often an academic's publications have been cited. Usually, this is very difficult to assess for someone with a common name (like """"Singh""""). In this case, too, there seem to be multiple """"PK Singh"""" (one of them a microbiologist), but all of them have been cited so little, that even if we just throw all on one heap and count everything, it just is not enough, not even in a low-citation density field like anthropology. If one clicks the Google Scholar link above (under """"find sources""""), the highest-cited article has 11 hits (and that is one by the microbiologist). The Web of Science (which has a lower coverage in the humanities and social sciences) finds 9 articles, cited a total of 13 times for an h-index of 1 (here, I searched for """"PK Singh""""). If opne searches for """"PK Singh"""" in GS, one finds some very highly-cited papers, but all by other persons (I went through several pages, down to articles cited about 30 times, none of them by the PK Singh under discussion here). In short, I see no evidence of this person having made a measurable impact on his field, as required by #1, nor do I see evidence of him passing any of the other criteria""" Deletion of Pradip Kumar Singh WP:ACADEMIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3253 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evil reptilian kitten-eater from another planet (2nd nomination) User:Reference 10:38, 18 April 2011 (UTC) keep """Editing Wikipedia with a constructive motive should have led any editor to do some research before nominating this article for AfD. ''The Chatham Daily News'' provides a clear definition for the term: """"evil reptilian kitten-eater from another planet, a term that surfaced in a press release from the PC campaign of Ernie Eves to describe McGuinty in the 2003 election."""" http://www.chathamdailynews.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=3073879 There are enough coverage and discussion of this phrase in the media http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22Evil+reptilian+kitten-eater+from+another+planet%22&num=100&hl=en&lr=&tbm=nws&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=WRCsTYnqMYjorQeChPinCA&ved=0CBIQpwUoBQ and in GBooks http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22Evil%20reptilian%20kitten-eater%20from%20another%20planet%22&num=100&hl=en&lr=&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=ar:1,bks:1&source=og&sa=N&tab=np The phrase has also received coverage in scholarly journals http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=%22Evil%20reptilian%20kitten-eater%20from%20another%20planet%22&num=100&hl=en&lr=&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ps does not apply for political phrases. Yes it is a newly developed political phrase, but it passes and """ Deletion of Evil reptilian kitten-eater from another planet (2nd nomination) WP:IINFO||WP:RS||WP:N Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3254 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaun T User:Rms125a 23:20, 6 June 2014 (UTC) delete fails |notability, fails |GNG Deletion of Shaun T WP:N||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3255 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebirth Of Genesis: Final Fantasy VII User:Someone 20:28, 3 March 2010 (UTC) delete A ''Final Fantasy'' game that the entire gaming community has somehow missed? |Complete bunch of crusty old bollocks Deletion of Rebirth Of Genesis: Final Fantasy VII WP:BOLLOCKS Wikipedia:Complete bollocks 62 +3256 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashleigh Townsend (2nd nomination) User:Papaursa 23:03, 6 May 2019 (UTC) delete I said at the first AfD discussion that he didn't meet or . A month later nothing has changed Deletion of Ashleigh Townsend (2nd nomination) WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3257 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antler-Subway Records User:ThePointblank 06:25, 31 October 2008 (UTC) delete As per . I do not see a third party article on the record company, nor do I see a reason why it is notable Deletion of Antler-Subway Records WP:COMPANY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3258 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buddy Peace User:Trevj 01:22, 13 November 2013 (UTC) keep per . The subject has been interviewed at least a couple of times.http://thepoetryquestion.com/2013/05/20/interview-buddy-peace-the-man-who-produces-those-underground-emcees/http://www.dazeddigital.com/music/article/8078/1/buddy-peace Looks good enough to me, and I stopped searching after finding those two, so there could be more Deletion of Buddy Peace WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3259 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yildiz Savaslari Com User:Isopropyl 18:52, 26 February 2006 (UTC) delete Does not appear to pass Deletion of Yildiz Savaslari Com WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3260 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Ozanne User:Crusio 20:34, 8 February 2009 (UTC) delete For someone who did his PhD 20 years ago, his scientific production and citation counts are very low. Does not meet Deletion of Adam Ozanne WP:ACADEMIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3261 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Fontaine User:MichaelQSchmidt 04:37, 5 August 2010 (UTC) delete """I tried to make it prettier and even learned that one of the films she was in (''Look (film)'') actually has a Wikipedia article... and though some of her roles do appear to be lead roles and might push at , after my going through the 99 """"Jennifer Fontaine"""" results afforded by http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=1992&as_user_hdate=2010&q=%22Jennifer+Fontaine%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-press%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&scoring=a&q=%22Jennifer+Fontaine%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-press%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&lnav=od&btnG=Go THIS search, I found one 2006 silver award from WorldFest-Houston International Film Festival for a film she produced in 2005, and only a very few mentions of her in regards other folks being in her film ''Stealth''... but nothing substantive that would support a BLP""" Deletion of Jennifer Fontaine WP:ENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3262 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hristijan Srkeski (footballer) User:Sir 13:18, 7 April 2014 (UTC) delete He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails and Deletion of Hristijan Srkeski (footballer) WP:NSPORT||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3263 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olga Kharitidi (2nd nomination) User:Sphilbrick 15:07, 19 December 2009 (UTC) delete Sometimes I see an article about an author with a recent book, and I wonder whether there will soon be coverage in |reliable sources, but her books go back over a decade. If she isn't getting any RS coverage, then merely having published books doesn't make her |Notable Deletion of Olga Kharitidi (2nd nomination) WP:RS||WP:N Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3264 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russian legal history User:Bearian 02:37, 9 February 2008 (UTC) keep It's a perfectly good legal stub, with two Deletion of Russian legal history WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3265 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amaury Guichon User:Atlantic306 17:01, 18 May 2017 (UTC) delete this autobiography is also a case of Deletion of Amaury Guichon WP:PROMO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3266 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holy Rosary parish, Warispura (2nd nomination) User:Bearian 18:23, 7 April 2021 (UTC) keep To be honest, I was ready to go along with deletion, but then saw |it's been covered in the media over the years for both religious and secular reasons. It's Deletion of Holy Rosary parish, Warispura (2nd nomination) WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3267 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Up User:Esradekan 03:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC) delete article fails to establish notability as per #Songs & Deletion of What Up WP:MUSIC||WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3268 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Awaaz-e-Punjab User:Kraose 08:47, 30 July 2018 (UTC) delete per . A mention already exists on Navjot_Singh_Sidhu#Politics|main page Deletion of Awaaz-e-Punjab WP:INHERITED Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +3269 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Cooley User:KevinJardine 01:14, 11 November 2018 (UTC) keep The sourcing appears solid enough to satisfy . I found the arguments of Deletion of Adam Cooley WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3270 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blake Palmer User:The 19:16, 25 December 2019 (UTC) delete since subject fails and Deletion of Blake Palmer WP:NACTOR||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3271 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick L Evans User:RightCowLeftCoast 16:21, 21 January 2013 (UTC) delete No ''significant coverage'' as defined by found in news or book sources, therefore failing that subject cannot pass or . The subject appears to have written three books, however he does not appear to pass Deletion of Rick L Evans WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:BAND||WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3272 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark McCrindle User:Qworty 08:21, 22 April 2011 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Mark McCrindle WP:AUTHOR||WP:BK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3273 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet Movie Firearms Database User:Ansh666 09:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC) keep per Dream Focus. I've seen more es (as I frequent the site and they sometimes post about articles about themselves) but I can't find them as Google News hates me Deletion of Internet Movie Firearms Database WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3274 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sin Sizzerb User:Ted87 07:14, 23 June 2007 (UTC) delete Mixtapes themselves are borderline notabile. So one by an artist who himself is unnotabile definatly doesn't meat Deletion of Sin Sizzerb WP:NM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3275 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kurt Boone User:Northamerica1000 10:02, 18 May 2012 (UTC) keep """Per , ...""""The absence of citations in an article (as distinct from the non-existence of sources) does not indicate that the subject is not notable."""" This topic easily passes , and sources are readily available. Boone has received extensive coverage in numerous reliable sources, including: The New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/05/nyregion/thecity/05mess.html, The New York Post http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/queens/cambria_hts_author_delivers_his_teaYWCKmbONbPWqj91j1RO, New York Daily News http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/queens/message-delivered-a-book-article-1.227135, New York Daily News http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/queens/messenger-literary-hope-article-1.466502, Courier Magazine http://www.couriermagazine.com/Content.asp?CID=133&offset=6, Metro New York http://www.metro.us/newyork/local/article/817692--60-seconds-with-the-delivery-man""" Deletion of Kurt Boone WP:NRVE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3276 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of sex symbols (4th nomination) User:Postdlf 21:56, 22 June 2020 (UTC) keep per Cunard. The sources available and cited in the article show how well many entries can not only be verified but contextualized in cultural history. The nominator and deletion !votes too easily disregard that and are either coming from (as with the nominator's quite obvious contempt) or (as with Staszek Lem's slippery slope fear that this would somehow explode to include the entire porn industry Deletion of List of sex symbols (4th nomination) WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:SUSCEPTIBLE Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +3277 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nour Al Zain User:SamHolt6 15:17, 1 September 2017 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Nour Al Zain WP:NMUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3278 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pear Cable Audio Cables User:MER 10:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Pear Cable Audio Cables WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3279 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/February 2021 Joe Biden speech to joint session of Congress User:Arccosecant 21:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC) delete per and lack of reliable sources other than the AP calendar entry, which states that the date is unconfirmed Deletion of February 2021 Joe Biden speech to joint session of Congress WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3280 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of postal codes in Portugal User:Lightburst 18:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC) delete a good example of Deletion of List of postal codes in Portugal WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3281 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faisal Rahman (2nd nomination) User:MrClog 12:11, 23 May 2019 (UTC) keep Passes . This has also been established in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faisal Rahman|nomination a week ago Deletion of Faisal Rahman (2nd nomination) WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3282 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamworth Council election, 2007 User:Whiteguru 11:07, 8 May 2011 (UTC) keep cl|English local elections by year}} has 56 subcategories, all full of pages akin to this - local elections by year in varia boroughs, counties and councils. They survive |notable and because they are lists. |The list of common outcomes for Politicians mentions campaign candidates and hopefuls who fail, and directs that if they are not notable for an article by themselves, then they go into a list of candidates for that election Deletion of Tamworth Council election, 2007 WP:N||WP:ONEVENT||WP:AFDP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3283 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GameRatio User:Rankiri 13:55, 1 April 2010 (UTC) delete I couldn't find any coverage either Deletion of GameRatio WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3284 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afelee Valoa User:Klant01 12:21, 17 October 2012 (UTC) keep Article satisfies to . (3. Have played FIFA recognised senior international football or football at the Olympic games.) He participated at the Oceanian Futsal Championship, a football tournament recognised by the FIFA. The winner of this tournament participates at the FIFA Futsal World Cup. Tuvalu is part of the OFC, the football association from Oceania and therefore recognised by FIFA. Article is already a half year on wikipedia if it will not be to the criteria satisfy Article already rather removes Deletion of Afelee Valoa WP:FOOTYN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3285 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suparatana Bencharongkul (2nd nomination) User:7 01:30, 15 June 2020 (UTC) keep Meets . And for reasons cited at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suparatana Bencharongkul Deletion of Suparatana Bencharongkul (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3286 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anton Medan User:NeoFreak 06:15, 29 March 2007 (UTC) delete Fails |attribution and |verifiability policies and after that long I'm not seeing that change Deletion of Anton Medan WP:ATT||WP:V Wikipedia:Attribution 34 +3287 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teresa Tease User:Horrorshowj 20:34, 23 December 2008 (UTC) delete nothing relevant found on either xbiz or avn, just trivial mention in a few film reviews. Fails to meet any either general or Deletion of Teresa Tease WP:PORNBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3288 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Buell User:ජපස 14:03, 10 January 2018 (UTC) delete per and . Those are two excellent guidelines that let us evaluate whether a person (note this is a living, breathing person we're talking about having an article focused solely on) should be subject to biographical scrutiny. In this case, neither of these criteria are fulfilled. Arguments that the person fulfills hinge mostly on the television show in which he was featured meeting the requirements for inclusion. A redirect to the television show may be appropriate, but keeping a separate biography with the notability lacking as it is in this case is something that we should not be doing and I would hate for precedent to be kept in keeping a biography solely on the basis of entanglements with the law and incidents indicating a failure to launch Deletion of Ryan Buell WP:FRINGEBLP||WP:CELEBRITY||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Fringe theories 44 +3289 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emsworth Cricket Club User:Edison 21:20, 29 January 2011 (UTC) delete Amateur sports club which got some routine local coverage over the centuries. Does not satisfy Deletion of Emsworth Cricket Club WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3290 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BugAware User:Joe 23:31, 13 October 2009 (UTC) delete I can't find |significant coverage for this software Deletion of BugAware WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3291 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhakti Arora Manekar User:onel5969 13:15, 28 November 2015 (UTC) delete as per nom and above editor. Not every game show contestant is notable. Searches turned up virtually nothing about this individual. Fails Deletion of Bhakti Arora Manekar WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3292 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katrina Campins User:Satori 13:29, 17 August 2006 (UTC) delete per and '''Redirect''' to The Apprentice 1 Deletion of Katrina Campins WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3293 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goldtec User:Northamerica1000 00:37, 21 July 2013 (UTC) delete I've nominated this article for speedy deletion (which is allowed even when an article is at AfD), because the text on the page (except for the infobox, section titles, refs and external links sections) is entirely a |copyright violation of http://mysterglas.wix.com/goldtec-technologies Deletion of Goldtec WP:COPYVIO Wikipedia:Copyright violations 16 +3294 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia Ann Laster User:Whisperjanes 19:38, 4 November 2020 (UTC) keep Plenty of in-depth coverage in newspapers to pass Deletion of Georgia Ann Laster WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3295 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saptagiri express movie User:Anupmehra 03:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC) keep Meets and . '''http://searchindiannews.in/search.html?query=%22Saptagiri%20Express%22,%20film&i=1#&gsc.q=%22Saptagiri%20Express%22%2C%20film&gsc.page=1 Sources Deletion of Saptagiri express movie WP:MOVIE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3296 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michel Mimran NONE NONE comment """Hello, Think88. For an article to be eligible for inclusion on the site, Wikipedia needs strong sources noting not just that an artist exists (and has their fans), but that their work is notable and discussed significantly by reliable sources. It's not a place to upload articles about people in the name of """"freedom of speech"""" (|because there are other venues for the promotion of artists). For example, sourcing your artist's work to a catalogue of an exhibition of their work doesn't necessarily tell us ''why'' their work is important in a broader cultural sense. Effectively, all this is is directly promotional of their work. Looking through the sources, they are mostly galleries where the artist exhibits. An artist may have many clients and a studio, but they need to be of wider cultural significance to have a Wikipedia article, and this needs to be demonstrated through the sourcing available ( is a list of specific criteria M. Mimran needs to satisfy before he gets his own article""" Deletion of Michel Mimran WP:NOTWEBHOST||WP:ARTIST Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3297 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kieran edwards User:Sparklism 10:57, 8 January 2013 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Kieran edwards WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3298 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sydney Uni Lions (2nd nomination) User:Hack 01:07, 3 January 2014 (UTC) delete Low level sports club, fails and . There is some coverage in local media but this amounts to |routine coverage (mostly match reports). The level of coverage is such that the article at present is primarily based on |primary sources. I note that there is not an article on the league in which it competes so would suggest merging salvageable content to the Sydney Uni Sport and Fitness and/or Gridiron NSW pages Deletion of Sydney Uni Lions (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:ORG||WP:ROUTINE||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3299 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Australian constitutional crisis User:Fremantle99 01:27, 20 August 2017 (UTC) keep """Given the size and scale of the issue, it definitely qualifies as an article under . One sub-chapter of another article can't quite capture the scale of the issue. An omission of this issue from Wikipedia's growing database of articles would be at best a severe oversight. On another point, people looking for information regarding these disqualifications will be more inclined to look up """"dual-citizenship disqualifications"""" or something similar rather than """"Section 44"""". Maybe the title of the article needs changing for the meantime but link the section on the disqualifications on the Section 44 article to this as a main article""" Deletion of 2017 Australian constitutional crisis WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3300 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aya (kitchens) User:Jollygreeng 01:30, 18 February 2009 (UTC) delete This company seems to pass the grade of being notable , especially in the area of green building where very few cabinet companies have a third party certified LEED compliant program. Looks like the comment posted above recommending 'delete' because the 2008 NKBA reference could not be found is not valid as the reference is http://www.nkba.ca/gallery/v/NKBA+ONTARIO+CHAPETR+DESIGN+AWARDS+2008/?g2_page=3 here Deletion of Aya (kitchens) WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3301 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Msafiri Zawose User:Northamerica1000 01:23, 27 October 2015 (UTC) keep Meets as per http://www.tampabay.com/news/humaninterest/tanzanian-musician-brings-african-culture-to-kids-of-belleair/1242402, http://www.msn.com/en-za/travel/news/musical-instruments-made-for-the-sound-of-tanzania/vp-BBiJdhw, http://allafrica.com/stories/201503031508.html, http://www.thecitizen.co.tz/magazine/success/Keeping-our-traditional-music-alive/-/1843788/1864880/-/v2kdn6z/-/index.html Deletion of Msafiri Zawose WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3302 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B'Robby User:Peridon 22:12, 15 July 2011 (UTC) comment It's not much help adding references for 'Terry tha rapman' - this would be of use if we were discussing an article on him. We're not. Whatever notability he has is not relevant here. We need references for this subject that are not mere mentions or offers of downloading something. Coverage. This means an article somewhere reliable that is written independently and actually discusses B'Robby. As to disability, there are and have been other blind artists. 'Not many' does not necessarily equal notable. Notably there have been Ray Charles and Stevie Wonder, to name two. Neither of them would have merited an article in their early days. If this artiste is so notable in Nigeria, how about proving it? Even so, you must look at for the standards needed. That's the easy way. To show that someone who fails them really is notable can be done. But you've got a hack of a job on your hands to do it, and references like the current ones are not the way Deletion of B'Robby WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3303 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spencer Paige User:Mazter00 13:37, 24 December 2012 (UTC) delete Fails with 2/0 (notable opponents/notable events) where 3/3 is required. The potential is not here as he figths for a smaller promotion. TUF fight are pro fights, not amateur fights. Since TUF Season N (I'm guessing around 5, maybe before that) UFC required that fighters who wanted to be on the show to be 21 years of age AND at least 3 or more pro fights. Amateurs are no longer allowed on TUF (where there ever? Maybe season 1). http://www.sherdog.com/fighter/Jason-Thacker-12690 Found one, Jason Thacker, no pro figths when entering season 1 Deletion of Spencer Paige WP:NMMA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3304 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huriye Yeliz Yüksel User:Djsasso 12:47, 30 August 2017 (UTC) delete Summed up pretty well already. I can find nothing anywhere that indicates they meet the Deletion of Huriye Yeliz Yüksel WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3305 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pascal Plisson User:Comte0 14:02, 7 April 2019 (UTC) keep The :fr:Pascal Plisson|French article has sources from Le Figaro, Le Monde and Canal+, which make it pass . Regards Deletion of Pascal Plisson WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3306 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helen Guthrie User:WilliamJE 16:55, 25 March 2018 (UTC) delete per . The article was almost certainly created by a family member Deletion of Helen Guthrie WP:NOTMEMORIAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3307 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teambox (2nd nomination) User:michokest NONE comment """User|michokest}} self identified as the founder (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Undelete&target=Talk%3ATeambox×tamp=20100104114752&diff=prev """"''I am the founder of Teambox.''"""") also !voted twice in the first AFD http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Teambox&diff=337226236&oldid=337044514http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FTeambox&action=historysubmit&diff=337769572&oldid=337766850 was has used multiple accounts to create, canvass and !vote for Teambox's's inclusion""" Deletion of Teambox (2nd nomination) WP:SOCK Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry 80 +3308 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hall Effect User:Edison 02:29, 10 November 2009 (UTC) delete Fails and is an annoying ripoff of Hall Effect. Should have (Band) as part of article name. By the way: If an electric current were passed through this band in the presence of a perpendicular magnetic field (not that I am suggesting for a moment that should be done) would a voltage appear across the band in the transverse direction? I think not Deletion of The Hall Effect WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3309 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Pearson (priest) [[User talk:Sirfurboy|talk]]) 12:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC) comment I am leaning towards delete, but this article is less of a stub than many I have seen. Not notable as a priest - which is to say that per , priests are not considered notable for being priests, but could be notable for other reasons. He could be notable for his missionary work in Uganda, but so far I find no evidence for this. Have you done a ? What were your results? So far I have found https://dacb.org/stories/uganda/pearson-charlesw/ this biography but the only source given is Crockford's and that is just a list of all clergy, so does not meet . I will come back again after I have done some more research. -- Sirfurboy File:Emojione1 1F3C4.svg|20px|Emojione1 1F3C4 Deletion of Charles Pearson (priest) WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE||WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3310 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rise of Victimhood Culture User:XavierItzm 23:40, 3 January 2019 (UTC) keep Meets . Excellent sourcing. People may quibble on the very notable article vs. the recently published book with the exact same topic with the same thesis by the same two authors: that conversation belongs on the TP. AfD is not cleanup and can never be Deletion of The Rise of Victimhood Culture WP:GNG||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3311 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yitong Law Firm User:Dream 23:35, 20 November 2011 (UTC) keep Significant coverage in reliable sources has been found. Nominator should follow and take a moment to check the Google news archive search before nominating this. Ample results, Northamerica1000 already mentioning some good ones Deletion of Yitong Law Firm WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +3312 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Leonard (Vivation) User:Pharaoh 01:23, 30 August 2014 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Jim Leonard (Vivation) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3313 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stimpy User:Arms 01:33, 27 May 2013 (UTC) merge to Ren and Stimpy (characters). No indication of no individual notability and no justification for a distinct article per . –  Deletion of Stimpy WP:SPLIT Wikipedia:Splitting 82 +3314 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powerhouse Films User:Ciccio 09:50, 16 January 2018 (UTC) keep It passes Deletion of Powerhouse Films WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3315 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhonda towns User:WJBscribe 23:50, 29 April 2007 (UTC) delete does not appear notable enough per and there are no reliable sources mentioning her. Do not redirect to the category, cross-namespace redirects should be avoided Deletion of Rhonda towns WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3316 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live Rushfeldt Deila User:Malo95 07:26, 13 June 2021 (UTC) keep First as information: handball is not a small sport it is under the five biggest team sports in the world and the clear number two in Europe. To the AfD: I found several sources about her and according to this https://www.aftenbladet.no/sport/i/AlpMWq/datter-til-tidligere-viking-spiller-har-signert-for-sola she signed in February a professional contract. According to https://zip.news/dk/index.html?ordering=PUBLISH_DATE&country=NO&mediaType=NEWS&query=Live+Rushfeldt+Deila zip.news there are 50 articles about her. I my eyes she will pass Deletion of Live Rushfeldt Deila WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3317 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Hillmann User:Ivanvector 02:16, 21 November 2016 (UTC) keep """sources indicate the subject clearly meets , and we don't seem to have a more specific notability guideline for bullfighters. Whether his 300-or-so bullfights constitute a single event or not, his career has received |significant coverage in reliable sources, and that's good enough. Yes, some of the sources are less reliable than others, but that's not enough to question their validity here. Furthermore this should be closed per : {{ul|Piotrus}} called it """"borderline"""" (which I ''don't'' interpret as an argument to delete) and nominator {{ul|SwisterTwister}} said """"confident keep"""" above although I'm not entirely sure how to interpret that comment, but that leaves nobody calling for deletion here""" Deletion of Bill Hillmann WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3318 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenbury Ridgely Henry User:Cunard 23:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC) merge The article cites several sources about Greenbury Ridgely Henry that verify the information in the article. Per , a merge/redirect to the society he co-founded is not unreasonable. {{user|John Milito}} has spent much of his time working on these articles. It would be a shame to delete wholesale his hard work. I concur that most of these subjects do not pass Wikipedia:Notability; however, there is no reason not to place several sentences from each of these articles into Phi Alpha Literary Society#Founders Deletion of Greenbury Ridgely Henry WP:PRESERVE Wikipedia:Editing policy 24 +3319 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilan Manulis User:Pan 18:54, 10 October 2006 (UTC) delete I doubt he passes . Using Google, I can't |verify (though maybe others can) the claim that he's got an asteroid named after him. Wouldn't say he's achieved fame or notoriety even if an asteroid was named after him. Google and Lexis-Nexis suggest he's not the primary subject of multiple non-trivial publications. As for the Israeli Astronomical Association, with http://www.google.com/search?q=%22israeli+astronomical+association%22&hl=en&lr=&start=180&sa=N 178 unique ghits, no results on Lexis-Nexis, and its http://www.astronomy.org.il/nuke2/modules.php?name=News English website being down, I'd say that the association, and especially its past president, is probably not notable. The bottom line, though, is that unless someone can come up with references, the article has to be deleted per Deletion of Ilan Manulis WP:BIO||WP:V||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3320 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Straight panic defence User:Bikeable 05:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC) delete as evident hoax, and can we apply Deletion of Straight panic defence WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +3321 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garius User:MuZemike 22:35, 30 November 2008 (UTC) merge to Zoids as a plausible search term. Otherwise, this is nothing but |unverifiable |original research (note: I will be copy-and-pasting this on the related AFDs as well, as the exact same rationale applies Deletion of Garius WP:V||WP:OR Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3322 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teebeedee User:Shell_Kinney 22:22, 12 March 2008 (UTC) delete fails |notability requirements, could almost be deleted as advertising Deletion of Teebeedee WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3323 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autumn's Concerto (South Korean TV series) User:Michaela 03:06, 4 October 2014 (UTC) delete No refs to support that this is actually real, fail . Could even be a hoax or a wish of an overzealous fan Deletion of Autumn's Concerto (South Korean TV series) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3324 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Baggs User:Rorshacma 17:53, 5 June 2012 (UTC) delete Even if the company that this individual became CEO of (extremely recently, too, it seems) is notable itself, notability is . And there are no sources to show that this individual has any independent notability of his own Deletion of Michael Baggs WP:NOTINHERITED Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +3325 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2003-04 NHL transactions User:Madchester 02:29, 8 August 2006 (UTC) comment Is the trade of Tom Koivisto for future considerations notable? Important trades should be included in the respective NHL season articles instead. The trades are ''factual'' and ''verifiable'' but they fail Deletion of 2003-04 NHL transactions WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3326 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herbert Schildt User:Colonel 04:49, 26 April 2010 (UTC) delete """Only has low-grade self-published sources - publisher's puffs and poison pen pieces - which are insufficient for a contentious, derogatory BLP. It is our |policy that """"''Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately""" Deletion of Herbert Schildt WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +3327 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter Dorn User:Lesnail 16:04, 11 December 2007 (UTC) delete fails and is copyright violation Deletion of Walter Dorn WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3328 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Furtling (2nd nomination) User:Zouavman 21:40, 11 August 2007 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Furtling (2nd nomination) WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +3329 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Thunder (helicopter) User:Trevj 02:50, 13 November 2013 (UTC) merge to Blue Thunder#Blue Thunder helicopter per lack of evidence of . There's already |due weight content there, and nothing reliably sourced which would warrant even selective merging. The ''keep'' !votes are not presenting any sources or valid rationales to demonstrate notability, and the position on offline sources is not whether they are valid but whether we know them to exist Deletion of Blue Thunder (helicopter) WP:GNG||WP:due weight Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3330 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of alleged UFO-related entities [[User talk:Eldereft|Eldereft]] ([[Special:Contributions/Eldereft|cont.]]) 18:53, 13 November 2008 (UTC) delete for lack of inclusion criteria backed by reliable sources. A historical analysis of trends in reported characteristics might make an interesting |sociology essay, though Deletion of List of alleged UFO-related entities WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3331 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Depledge User:4meter4 01:37, 6 October 2019 (UTC) keep Passes and Deletion of Alex Depledge WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3332 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halil Kayıkçı User:Meatsgains 21:40, 27 July 2016 (UTC) delete I was tempted to take this page to AFD after the subject's DOB was brought to BLPN, where it was first brought to my attention. Seems to be a case of Deletion of Halil Kayıkçı WP:1EVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3333 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronology of Star Wars User:pd_THOR 18:00, 15 April 2009 (UTC) delete This is nothing but |''Star Wars''{{'}} plot sourced solely from |primary sources. I agree with AMIB in that this seems to border on being a |copyright violation Deletion of Chronology of Star Wars WP:PLOT||WP:PSTS||WP:COPYVIO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3334 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold Jensen Christopher user:Andrew 17:59, 24 January 2021 (UTC) keep """A warship was named after him which is a """"''significant award or honor''"""" and so passes """ Deletion of Harold Jensen Christopher WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3335 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Meissner User:XOR 22:24, 8 January 2018 (UTC) keep The subject evidently meets . The article needs cleanup (I noticed some repeated text, for example), but that's not what AfD is for Deletion of Fred Meissner WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3336 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/It Takes Two (1982 TV series) User:Cavarrone 20:57, 22 May 2012 (UTC) keep """Wikipedia doesn't require the sources are immediately cited, just that they exist. require that we search for them before nominating an article for deletion (and for voting ''delete'', too), and in a case like this it's quite easy to find book and news sources about this TV-series, including some printed encyclopedias. If even we don't do a research, """"common sense"""" tells us that a TV-series broadcasted in prime time by ABC, starred by Richard Crenna and Patty Duke, created by Susan Harris, that '''already''' includes a reliable source, it is probably notable""" Deletion of It Takes Two (1982 TV series) WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +3337 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yugg [[User talk:2604:2000:8FC0:4:617F:E9A7:AF1C:4546|talk]]) 18:07, 10 December 2019 (UTC) delete Even if the fanfic met notability thresholds this would fail as an inappropriate split, the author should consider alternative outlets. Special:Contributions/2604:2000:8FC0:4:617F:E9A7:AF1C:4546|2604:2000:8FC0:4:617F:E9A7:AF1C:4546 Deletion of Yugg WP:BKD Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3338 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demographic surveillance system User:Mark 22:50, 29 September 2017 (UTC) keep I have rewritten and expanded the article to include several paragraphs backed by 10 reliable sources, all secondary for the basic facts they support. DSS are an important part of public health monitoring in developing countries. The multiple RS in the article, including two books, show notability per Deletion of Demographic surveillance system WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3339 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Crossed (2nd nomination) User:Papaursa 23:46, 13 June 2016 (UTC) delete He wasn't notable earlier this year and nothing has really changed. He obviously doesn't meet . I don't think that appearing in a local ad with Mike Tyson is sufficient to show notability via . I agree with the comment about Deletion of Sam Crossed (2nd nomination) WP:NBOX||WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3340 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chelsea F.C. vs FC Barcelona, 2009 UEFA Champions League semi-final, second leg User:Angelo 21:00, 7 May 2009 (UTC) delete per #NEWS and . About other comments: bad performances from referees happen everyday, even in the top flight, and it's nothing new; speaking foul language to a camera is not that original, actually. Of course, feel free to mention the controversy into the UEFA Champions League 2008–09 article, but a stand-alone article makes no sense Deletion of Chelsea F.C. vs FC Barcelona, 2009 UEFA Champions League semi-final, second leg WP:NOT||WP:RECENTISM Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3341 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rusty trombone (2nd nomination) User:Mallanox 03:28, 7 January 2007 (UTC) keep article doesn't need to have improved since last time as it was a keep result. Surely this is a case? —The preceding Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned comment was added by Deletion of Rusty trombone (2nd nomination) WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +3342 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Faye Lund User:DrStrauss 18:42, 29 July 2017 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Julian Faye Lund WP:NFOOTY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3343 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hallel Yaffa Ariel User:Darwinian 02:54, 14 July 2016 (UTC) delete Per , and also Deletion of Hallel Yaffa Ariel WP:BIO1E||WP:EVENT||WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3344 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JoAnn Giordano (2nd nomination) User:Coolabahapple 23:39, 1 August 2020 (UTC) keep meets , & , article has been improved (thanks {{u|Netherzone}}:)) since nomination to reflect this person's wikinotability Deletion of JoAnn Giordano (2nd nomination) WP:ARTIST||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3345 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libyan Premier League 2009-10 Fixtures & Results User:COMPFUNK2 22:18, 12 September 2009 (UTC) delete per . It also looks like the creator added a few tables but didn't put anything in them Deletion of Libyan Premier League 2009-10 Fixtures & Results WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3346 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfa Nero User:Mjroots 06:39, 9 March 2012 (UTC) keep per Bushranger. Needing expansion/improvement is not a reason to delete an article. appears to have been satisfied Deletion of Alfa Nero WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3347 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contact (word game) User:Jeff 02:22, 2 April 2013 (UTC) delete and salt per nom and Carrite. This article has been prodded twice (once by me) and deleted once already. Neither forums nor Google are -compliant. As far as I can tell, it has no redeeming qualities whatsoever.   Deletion of Contact (word game) WP:VRS Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything 79 +3348 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michigan State Miracle User:Cbl62 14:55, 18 October 2015 (UTC) delete for now or '''redirect''' to 2015 Michigan State Spartans football team#Michigan. This article was created about 6 hours after the game ended. College football games are dealt with appropriately in season articles on the teams involved. Individual college games only warrant stand-alone articles if they are shown, through the test of time, to be historically significant to the sport. It is simply |TOOSOON to determine whether this game will achieve that level of significance Deletion of Michigan State Miracle WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +3349 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skandha (disambiguation) User:FyzixFighter 17:33, 8 June 2018 (UTC) delete """per . IMO a compelling argument could be made that Skandha is the |primary topic (using Wikipedia's definition of primary topic) based on the relative number of adherents and number of hits from a google scholar search. Therefore a hatnote there should be sufficient, and Realphi has already added an additional bullet under """"see also"""" at Skanda for the Jainism topic""" Deletion of Skandha (disambiguation) WP:TWODABS||WP:PTOPIC Wikipedia:Disambiguation 64 +3350 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ocean's Thirteen User:155 02:42, 19 January 2007 (UTC) keep Completion or not it has obvious notibility and is well known. Also don't fail . Also it is rather standard that famous sequals to almost any series get accepted because they are inheretly notable (look at Harry Potter books and movies for example, sometimes started years before release Deletion of Ocean's Thirteen WP:POINT Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +3351 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Cashman User:E 17:22, 26 April 2018 (UTC) delete despite the fact that even the quickest gNews search https://www.google.com/search?q=%22carl+cashman%22&safe=active&client=firefox-b&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiRmbG2udjaAhXDneAKHbq-BmkQ_AUICigB&biw=1190&bih=686 shows an unusual amount of press interest in a LibDem city council member, it is too little, perhaps merely for an article Deletion of Carl Cashman WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +3352 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eon8 (2nd nomination) User:Motor 10:54, 1 July 2006 (UTC) delete Internet experiment which appears to fail . The article seems to be entirely original research. Plus, I rather agree with some of Deletion of Eon8 (2nd nomination) WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3353 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fractyl User:Shooterwalker 16:33, 21 September 2010 (UTC) delete lack of sources to . Needs third-party sources, not primary sources and unreliable sources Deletion of Fractyl WP:verify notability Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3354 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heap pollution User:Bluerasberry 19:17, 15 July 2014 (UTC) delete No attempt is made to comply with Wikipedia's inclusion criteria at or otherwise Deletion of Heap pollution WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3355 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn Hagele User:Bearian 00:44, 22 December 2007 (UTC) delete While there are lots of ''quotes'', there is not much ''about'' the subject. He is |not notable beyond the average board-certified physician and |adjunct college teacher. I don't see how ''deletion'' of a bio can be libel; in fact, the ''contra'' is true Deletion of Glenn Hagele WP:N||WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3356 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MIPSel User:Mark 23:11, 22 April 2013 (UTC) merge to MIPS architecture. One can verify that the term MIPSel exists, but there are few sources beyond a definition. While there are not enough in-depth reliable sources to support saving this article, it is a term that users could search on. So following , I suggest converting this to a redirect to MIPS architecture and adding the definition to the section MIPS architecture#CPU family where the bi-endian nature of the processor family is mentioned Deletion of MIPSel WP:PRESERVE Wikipedia:Editing policy 24 +3357 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elvin Aghayev User:Le 14:51, 29 March 2015 (UTC) delete Someone who's either just completed their PhD or is still writing up their dissertation, asserting this meets is fantastically overoptimistic, and presumably is because the author has the usual reason for writing about a nobody Deletion of Elvin Aghayev WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3358 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joaquim Ferreira (fighter) User:LiberatorLX 23:21, 23 October 2013 (UTC) delete Doesn't meet , he did beat a UFC champion though, so maybe passes Deletion of Joaquim Ferreira (fighter) WP:NMMA||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3359 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of delicacies User:Doc 19:32, 4 August 2008 (UTC) delete """Inclusion of what a """"delicacy"""" would be is |indiscriminate""" Deletion of List of delicacies WP:INDISCRIMINATE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3360 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Equatorial Guinea at the 2009 Lusophony Games User:AbstractIllusions 13:39, 2 January 2017 (UTC) delete For new events like the Lusophony Games, the best use to the reader seems to be fewer, focused articles rather than sprawling linked-to articles that become more like a |directory than a coherent article. I did searches on four of these (Angola, Mozambique, Sao Tome, and Equatorial Guinea) in Lexis, Proquest, and Newsbank and can't make a case for any coverage transcending outine and couldn't find any. Delete is warranted in terms of 1. GNG coverage standard and 2. Best help to readers/editors Deletion of Equatorial Guinea at the 2009 Lusophony Games WP:NOTDIR||WP:R Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3361 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premeditated User:Porqin 18:17, 10 August 2006 (UTC) delete This isn't , it is a random film that can't be |verified Deletion of Premeditated WP:NN||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3362 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Book store shoplifting User:North 13:33, 8 August 2015 (UTC) keep Seeing significant |RS coverage, more than sufficient to pass . See https://books.google.com/books?id=EchKhEduEBwC&pg=PT57&lpg=PT57&dq=Book+store+shoplifting&source=bl&ots=wGSCzvO8nX&sig=E-C5TkIbv5xR3af-QMB2M9Ym7f4&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CD4Q6AEwBTgUahUKEwj07IurzJnHAhXJGZIKHf8ADjE#v=onepage&q=Book%20store%20shoplifting&f=falsehttp://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/07/05/shoplifting-books-we-ll-miss-what-stealing-books-says-about-us-by-rachel-shteir.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/20/books/review/Rabb-t.html?_r=0 Deletion of Book store shoplifting WP:RS||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3363 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jorge Gotor Blas User:MbahGondrong 17:39, 5 May 2015 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Jorge Gotor Blas WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3364 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/POV Pervert User:Atlantic306 20:03, 24 June 2018 (UTC) delete as it does not pass or and the awards are in niche categories, thanks Deletion of POV Pervert WP:NFILM||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3365 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Patten User:Joe 01:59, 3 February 2010 (UTC) delete I can't find significant coverage for this |musician Deletion of Dave Patten WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3366 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rabbi's Wife User:RL0919 13:58, 19 March 2010 (UTC) keep I note that many articles about books by David Benedictus that were nominated recently had been prodded back in December. I did some basic research on them then. I only objected to the prods if I found evidence of multiple reliable sources. There seems to be a failure of on all these nominations Deletion of The Rabbi's Wife WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +3367 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madison McKinley User:NinjaRobotPirate 23:42, 4 July 2014 (UTC) delete There certainly are trace elements of notability, but I'm thinking this might be a case of having been created |too soon. As the nominator notes, COI/promotional edits have also been a problem, which generally lead me to the conclusion that it's not ready to stand on its own two feet yet. Once there's more coverage in |reliable sources, the article can be recreated. Right now, there isn't really much to say except that she appeared on a reality TV show Deletion of Madison McKinley WP:TOOSOON||WP:RS Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +3368 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indie911 User:Tainter 18:55, 29 January 2007 (UTC) delete fails as well as sounding a lot like a spamvertisment Deletion of Indie911 WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3369 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dustin Kellogg User:WilliamJE 16:24, 1 November 2014 (UTC) delete per and Deletion of Dustin Kellogg WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTMEMORIAL Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +3370 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eliska Sursova [[User talk:Florrie| florrie ]]''' 02:44, 15 May 2009 (UTC) delete """sources confusing and do not appear to be |reliable. See also Elissa Sursara which brings more doubt to the Eliska Sursova article. Which is the """"real"""" person? Listed at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Elissa_Sursara_.2F_Eliska_Sursova WP:BLPN yesterday for comment""" Deletion of Eliska Sursova WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3371 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Highland Hills Mall User:Northamerica1000 05:40, 23 July 2014 (UTC) merge to Kitchener, Ontario as a reasonable Deletion of Highland Hills Mall WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +3372 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of votes for Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act User:Krimpet 00:42, 22 April 2007 (UTC) delete Congress's website already lists every vote by every Congressman on their website (http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2003/roll242.xml here's the House's for this bill). |Wikipedia is not the place for this information Deletion of List of votes for Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3373 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Binahian User:JohnCD 21:06, 28 October 2010 (UTC) keep rescued version. I thought originally that this was a case of , but based on the excellent rescue work I am happy to keep it. Main problem now is lack of sources. I am pleased to see that the original author's work is not lost - she has posted it at a more suitable place: http://nyleve02.wordpress.com/2010/10/24/binahian Deletion of Binahian WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +3374 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International T-Shirt Day User:Alexius08 09:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC) delete as a poorly-|sourced article about a |hardly-celebrated holiday Deletion of International T-Shirt Day WP:RS||WP:N Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3375 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugene Puryear NONE NONE keep """spaced ndash}}Per , (within Wikipedia:Notability (people)) """"...multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability""" Deletion of Eugene Puryear WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3376 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UCLA Girl User:Chrishmt0423 01:24, 27 March 2011 (UTC) delete clearly fails Deletion of UCLA Girl WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +3377 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joselu (footballer, born 1987) User:BrazilianDude70 22:53, 9 June 2021 (UTC) comment u|Mattythewhite}} tried to add a PROD to the article back in 2014, but @{{u|In ictu oculi}} removed the PROD stating that he passed Deletion of Joselu (footballer, born 1987) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3378 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan MacDonald (2nd nomination) User:Ron 00:05, 20 June 2010 (UTC) merge The article is a |BLP Deletion of Nathan MacDonald (2nd nomination) WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +3379 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hillary O'Connor Mueri User:Bearcat 13:46, 16 November 2019 (UTC) delete """without prejudice against recreation in November 2020 if she wins the election. Candidates are not entitled to have Wikipedia articles just for being candidates, but have to win the seat and thereby hold the office to pass NPOL — but merely being ''one of'' the first members of an underrepresented group to do a not inherently notable thing is not a notability freebie that would give her the """"preexisting notability for other reasons"""" key: if she can't be shown to have received a -passing volume of reliable source coverage in that context at the time it was happening, then being able to source the fact to mentions of it as career background in coverage of her campaign announcement does not get her over the bar. And no, the fact that a couple of pieces of local coverage of her campaign announcement exist is not in and of itself a free pass over GNG either, because a couple of pieces of local coverage of campaign announcements ''always'' exist for ''every'' candidate in ''every'' election ''everywhere''. So to earn an article ''before'' winning the election, she would have to be sourced a hell of a lot better than this ''regardless'' of whether you're aiming for """"campaign coverage = GNG"""" or """"she was already notable enough for an article before she was even a candidate""" Deletion of Hillary O'Connor Mueri WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3380 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TotalCon User:Welshboyau11 09:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC) delete Non-notable and does not meet Deletion of TotalCon WP:EVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3381 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Escusa User:RightCowLeftCoast 23:57, 30 June 2011 (UTC) delete No significant coverage from reliable sources found, as stated in . Does not appear to pass Deletion of Jordan Escusa WP:GNG||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3382 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LeveL (webcomic) [[User:-Flare-|-Flare-]] 13:23, 11 November 2005 (UTC) comment The point of me mentioning the visits a day was to show that it is obviously known aside from the 40 people in the forum, since some of the voters for deletion used 'forum has 40 members, noone reads this thing' as an argument. It's not like this site DOESN'T generate tens of thousands of visitors a month. I was also referencing the guy that brought up points against Alexa rating, but he didn't have a user name, so it was probably easier to refer back to me. As for the ways that need not be described, it's obvious I'm a reader of the comic and thus have a bias, which is why mentioning any points about the actual quality of the comic over the quantity of activity around it would be putting myself on display to be torn apart. When I looked at before suggesting the article, it still had the alternate proposal that included longevity, a certain number of existant strips/pages and some other things that I can't remember right now but that were all met. Now that it's pretty much popularity only, any such argument has become void- I can't argue against the fact that it doesn't have an audience of millions Deletion of LeveL (webcomic) WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3383 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katti batti marathi movie User:Anupmehra 22:15, 22 January 2015 (UTC) delete """Subject fails and . There are absolute zero coverage on this film. ''Not to be confused with """"Katti Batti"""" (Hindi film) that has some sort of http://searchindiannews.in/#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=%22Katti%20batti%22&gsc.sort= coverage starring Kangana Ranawat and Imran Khan""" Deletion of Katti batti marathi movie WP:NF||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3384 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicoye Banks User:Glenfarclas 19:23, 13 December 2009 (UTC) delete """Most of the information I can find is obvious PR puff, e.g. claiming he """"co-starred"""" in things where he had a minor role. And IMDb doesn't show that he was ever in One Life to Live. Also, he tweets in block capitals; that's never a plus. Seriously though, he may make it big in the future, but so far he hasn't had the """"significant roles"""" or """"large fan base"""" we're |looking for""" Deletion of Nicoye Banks WP:ENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3385 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mangos (band) User:ShadowHalo 05:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Mangos (band) WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3386 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tina Jung User:Bearcat 23:37, 18 July 2017 (UTC) delete An actress does not get an automatic free pass over just because she's had a role — her role in ''Kim's Convenience (TV series)|Kim's Convenience'' was a minor guest appearance in two episodes, not a main character, and we have no way to know whether she's playing a major or minor character in ''Jigsaw'' since the casting has been announced but the plot and characters aren't known at all yet. For an actress to be considered notable just for having had roles, she has to be the ''subject'' of enough |reliable source coverage to clear — but exactly ''zero'' reliable sources about her are being shown here, since the sourcing consists of her IMDb profile, an alumni profile on the website of her own alma mater, and a casting announcement for ''Jigsaw'' which just namechecks her existence while failing to contain even one word of content about her besides her name. This is not the kind of sourcing that it takes to get an actress into Wikipedia. No prejudice against recreation if and when the sourcing can be improved Deletion of Tina Jung WP:NACTOR||WP:RS||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3387 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fritz Theater User:RightCowLeftCoast 05:01, 7 March 2011 (UTC) delete Although there has been coverage of plays that occurred a said theater by the http://www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%22The+Fritz+Theater%22&num=50#q=%22The+Fritz+Theater%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&tbs=nws:1,ar:1&prmd=ivns&source=lnt&sa=X&ei=-GV0Tay7F5H4swOqw-DKCw&ved=0CA8QpwUoBQ&bav=on.2,or.&fp=ac56f9c8492699d3 LA Times and SDUT there doesn't appear to be sufficient coverage of the subject of this article to warrant it passing . Subject of article may be sufficient to be covered under , however, it needs to pass first, and it doesn't look like there is sufficient secondary or tertiary |reliable sources that discuss the subject of the article as the primary focus of the writings Deletion of The Fritz Theater WP:GNG||WP:LOCAL||WP:GNG||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3388 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011–12 Los Angeles arson attacks (3rd nomination) User:Mkdw 22:19, 9 January 2013 (UTC) keep """WP:NOTNEWS says in the first sentence: """" ''editors are encouraged to include current and up-to-date information within its coverage, and to develop stand-alone articles on significant current events'' """". Essentially it's very difficult to prove this event isn't significant with the length of coverage its received. Your argument must rely mostly on your |personal opinion as the basis of it not being a significant current event""" Deletion of 2011–12 Los Angeles arson attacks (3rd nomination) WP:IDONTLIKEIT Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +3389 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akiko Hatsu [[User talk:208.245.87.2|talk]]) 12:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC) comment I wasn't aware we had a , but even so I'm ambivalent on this one. I just find it odd that if this artist does indeed have 30+ works under their belt, why do we (and ANN) only have two listed? If I saw just, say, 3-4 more I'd say '''keep'''. Special:Contributions/208.245.87.2|208.245.87.2 Deletion of Akiko Hatsu WP:DEADLINE Wikipedia:There is no deadline 81 +3390 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Latif Khan Tarin User:Anotherclown 08:28, 8 September 2014 (UTC) delete a Google Books search didn't reveal https://www.google.com.au/search?q=Abdul+Latif+Khan+Tarin&btnG=Search+Books&tbm=bks&tbo=1&gws_rd=ssl#tbm=bks&q=Abdul+Khan+Dujaila any significant coverage that I could see. Fails the and is therefore not notable. No doubt a brave soldier but insufficient coverage to justify a stand alone article. If indeed his role in the Battle of Dujaila was important there is no reason it cannot be covered in that article assuming that there are |reliable sources to support the information and it is added in a way that does not constitute |undue weight Deletion of Abdul Latif Khan Tarin WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:UNDUE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3391 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Over Ashes User:fvw 17:21, 14 December 2008 (UTC) delete some notability perhaps, for very small values of some, but nothing approaching Deletion of Over Ashes WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3392 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahool User:Alexbrn 19:49, 12 June 2018 (UTC) delete Not covered in ependent sources Deletion of Ahool WP:FRIND Wikipedia:Fringe theories 44 +3393 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Gracie User:VMS 03:25, 10 January 2015 (UTC) keep Available cites may be a little on the thin side, but mainly oppose because y is a misuse of this process Deletion of Marc Gracie WP:POINT Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +3394 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeitgeist: Addendum User:Jclemens 18:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC) merge """to Zeitgeist the Movie per If it had """"its own notability"""" or """"is famed sic"""" then it should have reliable secondary sources, which the article does not. I'm going to skip a search for them because so many people have already voted keep that I presume that they would have taken the time to add any extant sources; as is, I see at most one reliable, independent source""" Deletion of Zeitgeist: Addendum WP:NNC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3395 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elastic men/women fetish User:GIen 01:06, 9 August 2006 (UTC) delete Until such time as is met I would assume this is a hoax Deletion of Elastic men/women fetish WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3396 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integral yoga User:ජපස 11:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC) keep and perhaps promote to a main article to grow past the current domination of Integral theory (Ken Wilber) which is, for example, to what integral philosophy redirects. I have become convinced looking at the various sources which discuss Sri Aurobindo that integral yoga and Sri Aurobindo's philosophy are actually ''more'' influential in New Age circles than Ken Wilber's work. See California Institute of Integral Studies for an example of a thriving New Age community built around this tradition. Yes, it is ... but it appears to me to be . I don't think this is a situation here, to be honest Deletion of Integral yoga WP:FRINGE||WP:NFRINGE||WP:TNT Wikipedia:Fringe theories 44 +3397 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cypress Creek, Florida User:Hog 23:36, 4 November 2020 (UTC) delete I turned up a road in Ft. Lauderdale, a corporate park in Ft. Lauderdale, some sort of feature in Boynton Beach, Florida, and a park near Lutz, Florida. This article appears to be an attempt to the two Ft. Lauderdale ones into a community Deletion of Cypress Creek, Florida WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3398 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Burkett (cricketer) User:Reyk 16:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC) delete doesn't meet the . A rebuttable presumption of notability isn't an exemption from sourcing requirements, no matter what some would have us believe Deletion of Michael Burkett (cricketer) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3399 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Rice User:Paste 15:35, 26 February 2011 (UTC) merge I would agree that a redirect is the correct route for this article, a tragic and untimely death but Deletion of Jordan Rice WP:ONEEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3400 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CD Gold 2 User:Joe 23:01, 27 May 2010 (UTC) delete I can't find significant coverage for this |album Deletion of CD Gold 2 WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3401 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Leakey User:Whiteguru 11:49, 28 September 2020 (UTC) delete although an interesting narrative, it is self-referential, and half the article is about the family. Fails Deletion of Jonathan Leakey WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3402 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robi Botos User:Whpq 20:43, 19 May 2010 (UTC) keep Meets as a winner of a major music competition Deletion of Robi Botos WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3403 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Creepy Line User:Jmertel23 15:24, 17 November 2018 (UTC) delete fails notability guidelines Deletion of The Creepy Line WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3404 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dough Related Productions User:Duffbeerforme 03:40, 10 July 2019 (UTC) delete Non |notable vanity label for non notable artist. lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Label does not inherit notability from an artist appearing on the ARIA charts (a claim not backed up). Claims multiple other artists with pages but article only lists one, the founder who shall be going to afd. Label is not notable because |other bad articles exist Deletion of Dough Related Productions WP:NCORP||WP:OTHERSTUFF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3405 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Jeandell User:Horologium 00:36, 9 May 2008 (UTC) delete under G4 and '''Salt''' to prevent recreation. The link above is to his thesis, which is apparently available at the University of Delaware library. This does not establish notability; it only establishes that he wrote a thesis for a Master's Degree. The references in the article include a wedding announcement and a Geocities page. He doesn't begin to approach the qualifications required in Deletion of Jason Jeandell WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3406 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Normal Bob Smith (2nd nomination) User:Quarl NONE comment """I would like to remind everyone to debate whether the article should be included from fundamentals such as notability, verifiability, media references; does the subject meet ? Arguments about """"recreation without DRV"""" don't apply because this article is very different from the previous version (which was 1 sentence during the previous AFD), most likely created by different users; the previous AFD was hardly a concensus at 2 delete """"votes"""" followed by 1 keep """"vote""" Deletion of Normal Bob Smith (2nd nomination) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3407 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sicmed User:Doctree 15:54, 4 July 2012 (UTC) delete per nom and . I found many mentions of the project but no results, no |reliable sources to establish |notability. If the project produces results later, it can be recreated but its not suitable as an article now per Deletion of Sicmed WP:TOOSOON||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +3408 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC 158 User:TreyGeek 13:54, 21 December 2012 (UTC) comment The keep arguments have failed to address issues with this article, particularly in light of other recent AfDs in which future UFC events were deleted. Also the article currently fails due to its lack of well-sourced prose; it has practically no prose. I would advice those wishing to keep the article would do better to write actual prose discussing the background of the event thus far as it would bolster any notability arguments they are attempting to make Deletion of UFC 158 WP:SPORTSEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3409 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tennessee Volunteerz User:Galatz 14:16, 11 June 2019 (UTC) delete Not finding anything that meets Deletion of The Tennessee Volunteerz WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3410 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E. J. Wells (musician) User:Master 03:43, 15 October 2008 (UTC) delete Because this is a clear |conflict of interest, and the subject is not notable enough for a Wikipedia article Deletion of E. J. Wells (musician) WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +3411 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Other researchers who claim or may claim their crucial roles in the discovery of graphene User:Warrah 20:51, 7 December 2009 (UTC) delete WP:NPOV and issues Deletion of Other researchers who claim or may claim their crucial roles in the discovery of graphene WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3412 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zin-carla User:Percy 13:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC) delete no independent coverage; fails , , /N Deletion of Zin-carla WP:N||WP:FICT||WP:RPG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3413 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interhall Council User:BQZip01 00:55, 25 February 2008 (UTC) keep per , but needs more sources. Just because it needs sources though, doesn't mean it should be deleted Deletion of Interhall Council WP:SUMMARY Wikipedia:Summary style 23 +3414 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gia na xereis alaniari [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 15:14, 21 July 2017 (UTC) delete The articles fail , , and (in some cases) . Perhaps some of them could be combined into a list article if sources are available to show notability Deletion of Gia na xereis alaniari WP:GNG||WP:NSONG||WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:LISTN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3415 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Solaris Effect User:Stifle 20:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC) delete The article does not |cite accessible, |reliable sources and as such I am unable to |verify that this term is used Deletion of The Solaris Effect WP:CITE||WP:RS||WP:V Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3416 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Path Solutions (2nd nomination) User:HighKing 14:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC) delete As per nom, fails GNG, references fail and/or Deletion of Path Solutions (2nd nomination) WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3417 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mandalasana User:APerson 13:38, 28 April 2015 (UTC) delete per |NOTMANUAL Deletion of Mandalasana WP:NOTMANUAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3418 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yehuda Farkas User:Onebravemonkey 09:48, 2 November 2006 (UTC) delete per . I've had a good go at verifying this and haven't been able to find anything substantial Deletion of Yehuda Farkas WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3419 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strawberry Machine User:Dylanfromthenorth 04:28, 9 January 2016 (UTC) delete Nowhere near reaching the level of notability required to meet the |general notability guideline, or the |specific guideline for bands Deletion of Strawberry Machine WP:GNG||WP:NBAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3420 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Webber User:SWik78 20:00, 14 July 2008 (UTC) delete The subject of the article fails , the main criteria that would apply to him in terms of notability since he's nothing more than a nominee for the democratic primary for the Missouri House of Representatives. He appears to have quite a bit of independent coverage from |reliable sources but all of those are related to a single event, failing . The subject would merit inclusion into a possible article on the election to the Missouri House of Representatives if, and only if, he's chosen as the democratic nominee. Even then, barring other events that would make him notable, he does not deserve a stand-alone article unless he's elected to serve in the House Deletion of Stephen Webber WP:POLITICIAN||WP:RS||WP:ONEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3421 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assassination threats against Donald Trump User:Muboshgu 17:07, 17 August 2016 (UTC) delete WP:PROFRINGE, . –  Deletion of Assassination threats against Donald Trump WP:SYNTH Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3422 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Robb (writer) User:7triton7 05:38, 12 February 2009 (UTC) delete Falls short of , but it's a close call. Not enough on Google to convince me Deletion of Bruce Robb (writer) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3423 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audrey Denney NONE NONE keep """The current content and depth/range of sources in this article is somewhat thin, but Wikipedia:Deletion policy says """"If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page."""" I took a quick look for potential sources, and I found many newspaper articles from a range of regional papers with in-depth analysis of why this campaign was unusual for this region and interesting in the context of patterns in the overall 2018 midterm election. I see a reasonable argument for this topic passing . I haven't yet found any larger national papers such as the ''LA Times'', ''Washington Post'', or ''New York Times'' covering her campaign in detail - with that, I would have a stronger Keep vote, but I think this is reasonable enough coverage for GNG""" Deletion of Audrey Denney WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3424 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitrina Podilata User:Spada2 17:36, 7 July 2010 (UTC) delete has some Google hits but the article is unsourced and doesnt meet usic Deletion of Kitrina Podilata WP:M Wikipedia:Mediation 70 +3425 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Dougherty (police officer) (2nd nomination) User:Bearian 23:00, 8 December 2020 (UTC) keep WP:SIGCOV|plenty of coverage. Even if he had not been Marilyn Monroe's first husband (which I do not concede is precluded by ), as the first SWAT trainer, he's notable Deletion of James Dougherty (police officer) (2nd nomination) WP:NOTINHERITED Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +3426 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skirt (slang) User:Dcandeto 16:49, 28 February 2007 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Skirt (slang) WP:WINAD Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +3427 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johan Lange (football coach) User:Tgeairn 17:24, 7 June 2012 (UTC) delete As above, the subject does not meet . In that case, the subject would need to meet in general, which I can find no evidence of Deletion of Johan Lange (football coach) WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3428 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stereotype space User:MarkH21 01:48, 15 April 2020 (UTC) delete to Reflexive space#Other types of reflexivity: Per the arguments made by Taku and D.Lazard, this is not a term widely-used by independent secondary sources to the point that is not met and can apply.{{pb}}Once could argue for a merge to topological vector space, the greater class of objects for which there is substantial secondary sources and standard terminology, but very little content in this article should be merged there on the basis of Deletion of Stereotype space WP:GNG||WP:NEOLOGISM||WP:DUE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3429 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahul Rajasekharan User:4meter4 20:47, 16 June 2021 (UTC) keep per sources found by GRuban and those cited in the article. Passes Deletion of Rahul Rajasekharan WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3430 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chodankar User:Jd027 22:48, 11 February 2008 (UTC) delete It may work better as a disambiguation page, although no one as of now is named that on Wikipedia. For now, delete per Deletion of Chodankar WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3431 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Alers [[User talk:204.126.132.231|talk]]) 18:01, 26 March 2014 (UTC) delete Second tier championships don't show notability. Fails . Special:Contributions/204.126.132.231|204.126.132.231 Deletion of Jim Alers WP:NMMA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3432 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church User:StAnselm 08:42, 22 September 2011 (UTC) keep Actually, I think all ''denominations'' (rather than churches) are ''de facto'' notable. Articles such as this are Wikipedia:Ignore all rules|useful to the encyclopedia for people wishing to navigate through the maze that is Presbyterianism. :Category:Presbyterian denominations and List of Presbyterian denominations in Australia illustrate the sort of thing I mean. |Size doesn't matter of course Deletion of Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church WP:NOTBIGENOUGH Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +3433 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sindhu Joy (2nd nomination) User:scope_creep 12:27, 8 April 2021 (UTC) keep I checked several of the references in Beccaynr's table and they are good. Excellent work Beccaynr. Easily passes Deletion of Sindhu Joy (2nd nomination) WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3434 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Jackson (activist) User:Bearian 17:21, 12 August 2019 (UTC) delete it's not even wrong; he's neither |notable nor |an activist Deletion of Daniel Jackson (activist) WP:GNG||WP:SOAP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3435 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of Irish-Americans (2nd nomination) User:Nihonjoe 03:48, 13 September 2007 (UTC) keep I agree with ExRat and Badagnani. In addition, this mass nomination is too |POINTY Deletion of Lists of Irish-Americans (2nd nomination) WP:POINT Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +3436 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Zubair (cricketer, born 1987) User:Wjemather 16:10, 13 March 2021 (UTC) delete No significant coverage, only wide-ranging databases built on scorecard data, so fails and . This trumps the trivial pass of NCRIC (playing for the weakest team in the competition) which by consensus is a very poor indicator of worthiness for a standalone article in cases such as these. Lack of any performances of note suggests no coverage will be found. Redirect would be an accepted ATD, but a suitable target does not exist Deletion of Mohammad Zubair (cricketer, born 1987) WP:GNG||WP:SPORTCRIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3437 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Ellen Niver User:Bearian 00:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC) delete """per . One of the worse written articles I've ever seen in 8 years as an active Wikipedian. """"Local Expert"""" means |run of the mill travel blogger. """"Are you serious""" Deletion of Lisa Ellen Niver WP:TNT||WP:MILL Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +3438 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notre Dame of Greater Manila User:Peter303x 07:59, 22 June 2021 (UTC) delete Fails . Not enough citations Deletion of Notre Dame of Greater Manila WP:NSCHOOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3439 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominique Xardel User:Rhode 15:43, 21 October 2012 (UTC) delete Clearly does not meet notability requirements as an author (see ) and has received negligible coverage by secondary sources Deletion of Dominique Xardel WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3440 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oak Forest, Florida User:MB 04:33, 17 December 2016 (UTC) delete I found a youtube video that says it has 250 homes/condos and a community center with a pool, weight-room and tennis courts. Seems to be a very neigborhood Deletion of Oak Forest, Florida WP:MILL Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill 32 +3441 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamic counterbary [[User talk:Satori Son|Satori Son]] 21:18, 12 September 2006 (UTC) delete per . Article is completely unsourced Deletion of Dynamic counterbary WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3442 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titans (Crash of the Titans) User:Sephiroth 04:38, 12 June 2008 (UTC) delete fails #GUIDE, nothing more than a list of enemies with excessive detail Deletion of Titans (Crash of the Titans) WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3443 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euthanasia Coaster User:Reference 10:18, 24 April 2011 (UTC) keep Enough coverage to pass Deletion of Euthanasia Coaster WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3444 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia Alvarez (politician) User:Kudpung 01:46, 21 September 2019 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Claudia Alvarez (politician) WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3445 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mind Riders Tech User:Bonadea 14:56, 30 October 2015 (UTC) delete Fails ; of the five references currently in the article, four are primary sources including press releases and the CEO's own website, and the fifth one looks like a rewrite of a press release so that's essentially primary as well Deletion of Mind Riders Tech WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3446 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avalon Roberts User:Powerful 15:08, 22 May 2021 (UTC) delete as per nom. Subject fails Deletion of Avalon Roberts WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3447 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pokémon (1-20) User:Hbdragon88 19:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC) keep Active merger discussion is going on on said article's talk page. Quite a few people within the PCP project (A Man In Black before he left, Erik the Apperciator, You Can't See Me, Amarkov, me; even Zappernapper, but he favors evo line merging) do '''not''' agree that all the Pokemon are notable enough to each have their own articles. Please do not attempt to use to force merger decisions or to delete an idea that you disagree with Deletion of List of Pokémon (1-20) WP:AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +3448 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Hamilton (musician) User:AllyD 18:06, 12 April 2012 (UTC) delete I've located and added several references to the article, but don't think there is enough there to meet Deletion of Steve Hamilton (musician) :WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3449 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jayachandran P R User:Bakazaka 01:03, 25 July 2018 (UTC) delete Fails . Named in list of team members finding one new species, and cited coverage is not significant coverage of subject, so no individual notability. Fails with low impact and no qualifying posts or awards Deletion of Jayachandran P R WP:GNG||WP:NACADEMIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3450 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayesha Khalid User:Patar 08:26, 1 December 2015 (UTC) delete does not meet , and related show he's famous for was recently deleted via Deletion of Ayesha Khalid WP:GNG||WP:PROD Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3451 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Ricca [[User talk:2001:8003:5999:6D00:8826:7EAA:B135:5C72|talk]]) 07:18, 20 August 2019 (UTC) delete Fails . Non notable local wrestler. Hammonton News is a local suburban newspaper with limited circulation http://www.thedailyjournalsolutions.com/solutions/products-and-services/print-products/the-atlantic-county-weeklies/ see here for proof that it's local which does nothing for notability. Agree with nom about promotional article. Special:Contributions/2001:8003:5999:6D00:8826:7EAA:B135:5C72|2001:8003:5999:6D00:8826:7EAA:B135:5C72 Deletion of Tony Ricca WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3452 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multigarchy User:Clarityfiend 05:46, 21 April 2013 (UTC) delete per nom as an unnoticed, unsuccessful Deletion of Multigarchy WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +3453 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atmospheric Jellyfish User:Terraxos 02:38, 9 January 2009 (UTC) delete this article is essentially |original research, and has a severe lack of reliable sources Deletion of Atmospheric Jellyfish WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3454 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountain Ridge High School User:danntm 01:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC) delete yet's at wait for the school to open before writing articles, alternatively, merge salvageable content to the community's article per Deletion of Mountain Ridge High School WP:LOCAL Wikipedia:Places of local interest 41 +3455 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Bieber User:DJAMP4444 18:59, 15 June 2014 (UTC) delete may I ask why this article was not proposed for deletion in accordance with PROD Deletion of Jeremy Bieber WP: BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +3456 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hot Box User:Yomangani 14:42, 9 August 2006 (UTC) delete per nom and Deletion of The Hot Box WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3457 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad pie User:HisSpaceResearch 12:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC) delete per , , , . This should be easy Deletion of Bad pie WP:V||WP:NEO||WP:WINAD||WP:N Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3458 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michel Boulos User:MarnetteD 21:18, 5 August 2020 (UTC) keep per . Try and remember that there have been times when all Olympic athletes were semi-professional athletes - or even full amateurs Deletion of Michel Boulos WP:NOLYMPICS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3459 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Christmas special (Doctor Who) User:TreasuryTag 14:41, 13 July 2010 (UTC) keep """ is completely irrelevant, as it merely notes that, """"Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable speculation."""" This article contains no unverifiable speculation: it is all referenced. Indeed, point 1 of precisely covers such a situation. (Would you also nominate 2012 Summer Olympics for deletion on the basis that it's not happened yet""" Deletion of 2010 Christmas special (Doctor Who) WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3460 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Henderson User:Number 20:08, 2 October 2016 (UTC) delete per failure. The reason there are only three fully-pro women's leagues is because there is less interest in them, and therefore the players don't have the same level of notability Deletion of Emily Henderson WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3461 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biblical christian belief User:Kim 15:31, 11 January 2008 (UTC) delete As written, there is no way the article's claims could be established by reference to any |source which could be cited. If re-written (entirely!) to say 'Some people claim that.....XYZ' with a good reference that establishes this fact is |notable, it could survive. But I suspect this is unlikely to happen, and atricles outlining these views in a POV|neutral manner probably already exist anyway Deletion of Biblical christian belief WP:V||WP:N||WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3462 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Pentland User:RayAYang 16:54, 1 August 2008 (UTC) keep notable as an |academic. He's a tenured, chair professor at MIT Deletion of Alex Pentland WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3463 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AMG International User:MichaelBillington 11:54, 23 October 2006 (UTC) delete Reads as an advertisement, ( Deletion of AMG International WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Spam 26 +3464 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artyom Dubovsky User:TheSpecialUser 11:12, 4 July 2012 (UTC) delete Not played in a full pro league and not enough done at 3rd level game. Fails and Deletion of Artyom Dubovsky WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3465 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of landmarks in Las Vegas User:Bearian 03:46, 3 December 2009 (UTC) keep """I can't see what guideline or policy this violates. It seems to pass . Virtually all of the """"landmarks"""" are notable by themselves, so a list of such would also be notable. Cut out the cruft (NN sites) and |fix the citations. Am I missing something""" Deletion of List of landmarks in Las Vegas WP:LIST||WP:RS Wikipedia:Lists 36 +3466 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vulcan High Command User:Doctorfluffy 15:25, 5 January 2008 (UTC) delete It's doubtful secondary sources exist to establish |notability and it's mostly just OT#PLOT|plot summary Deletion of Vulcan High Command WP:N||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3467 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative versions of Rogue User:Whiteguru 06:25, 20 September 2020 (UTC) merge to Rogue (comics)|Rogue per writing about Fiction. Should have been summmarized Deletion of Alternative versions of Rogue WP:WAF Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +3468 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China Garden Restaurants User:RichardOSmith 20:28, 5 February 2012 (UTC) delete http://www.google.co.uk/#sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&source=hp&q=how+many+chinese+restaurants+in+us&pbx=1&oq=how+many+chinese+res&aq=2&aqi=g4&aql=&gs_sm=c&gs_upl=2846l7961l0l9750l22l16l1l5l5l0l157l1474l10.6l22l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=531836a7026a05cc&biw=1415&bih=702 Aparrently there are about 40,000 Chinese Restaurants in the US alone. Whatever the actual number, I can belive this is a good one to visit, but I'm not seeing any reason for considering this one to be especially |notable Deletion of China Garden Restaurants WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3469 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valdas Pocevičius User:CaSJer 16:54, 19 February 2013 (UTC) delete fails the intention of . The guidelines may not specifically call out that Rings Lithuania isn't the same as :Fighting Network RINGS, but common sense dictates that it's not a top tier organization Deletion of Valdas Pocevičius WP:NMMA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3470 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Wayne Sinclair User:Sceptre 21:52, 19 June 2008 (UTC) delete per #G4, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Badlydrawnjeff#Summary deletion of BLPs, and standard message given on create-protected pages Deletion of Larry Wayne Sinclair WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +3471 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rory Sweetman User:E 22:32, 17 May 2015 (UTC) keep This minor historian in the very small field (Irish immigrants in New Zealand) fails . But mayjust squeak past when you add the 2 respectful reviews of ''Fair and Just Solution'' to the popular coverage of a controversy surrounding the official history of the boy's school and his very minor presence on the lecture circuit as a speaker on Irish immigrants in New Zealand Deletion of Rory Sweetman WP:PROFESSOR||WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3472 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helene Rask (2nd nomination) User:SWik78 15:20, 17 April 2008 (UTC) keep Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm guessing it's being nominated for deletion due to a perceived advertisement or . Even if the current version contains such flaws, the article has been around since late 2004 so it's definitely fixable Deletion of Helene Rask (2nd nomination) WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +3473 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Pirillo (2nd nomination) User:Cirt 16:46, 15 November 2010 (UTC) keep Satisfies . I am seeing quite a bit of coverage from multiple different |reliable secondary sources independent of the subject Deletion of Chris Pirillo (2nd nomination) WP:NOTE||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3474 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Online Film Critics' Poll User:Erik 18:43, 4 January 2013 (UTC) delete """per not meeting Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)|the notability guidelines for organizations. Anna made me realize that this topic can be seen as an organization, and I had not considered the guidelines specific to organizations. in particular was my earlier concern; even with reliable sources, the content amounts to routine announcements. In addition, upon reviewing ''Yes! Weekly'', I just noticed that the writer said the following: """"Founded in 2007, this marked the third edition of the IOFCP — and the first in which ''I was honored to participate''"""" (italics mine). I think this disqualifies it as an independent source even as it provides a bit more history than the rest of the sources""" Deletion of International Online Film Critics' Poll WP:ORGDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3475 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pin Young User:Shruti14 03:41, 21 March 2008 (UTC) delete can add later when she does something more notable, currently non-notable per Deletion of Pin Young WP:NOTE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3476 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blake Murray User:Papaursa 21:24, 7 August 2017 (UTC) delete Right now he doesn't appear to meet either or . At best this is Deletion of Blake Murray WP:GNG||WP:NHOCKEY||WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3477 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Andy User:DarkAudit 17:09, 11 May 2007 (UTC) delete fails on numerous levels. No verifiable, reliable, independent sources whatsoever. MySpace and fan sites do not count Deletion of Green Andy WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3478 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jame Gumb (2nd nomination) [[user talk:sottolacqua|talk]]) 18:26, 13 September 2011 (UTC) comment The length of the article is not a factor used in determining whether this meets . The three references listed aren't applicable to most of the content in the article. Two references relate to which real-life individuals the character is based upon. The other is a parental guide about the film content, which mentions the character briefly, but is more related to the graphic content of the film. Sottolacqua Deletion of Jame Gumb (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3479 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emerging market business User:Abu 19:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC) delete my apologies to Vital Wave Consulting, but this really looks like a spam |fork of emerging markets, which the author {{fullurl:emerging markets|diff=102915212}} previously tried to spam Deletion of Emerging market business WP:CFORK Wikipedia:Content forking 33 +3480 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burlington Center Mall User:Dpbsmith 18:35, 8 June 2006 (UTC) delete Generic mall. No published sources for the information in this article are cited, does not currently meet |verifiability policy. Does anyone in this discussion know ''for sure'' whether it is a Sears or a Montgomery Ward's? Are you ''certain'' it is a Chuck E. Cheese and not a Pizza Hut? Has anybody done any fact-checking? Of course not. Why not? Because nobody cares enough about what stores are in this mall to do five minutes' worth of honest research. I could go into that article and make up some plausible-sounding additions off the top of my head of well-known stores that favor mall locations, like Burger King, Radio Shack, and Suncoast Motion Pictures, and nobody would be any the wiser Deletion of Burlington Center Mall WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3481 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boys Suck User:Sting_au 01:38, 18 December 2007 (UTC) delete nn fails Deletion of Boys Suck WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3482 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Buckley (artist) User:BuickCenturyDriver 03:12, 11 February 2007 (UTC) keep He wrote a couple of legitamate books. Perhaps you nominated per Deletion of Tim Buckley (artist) WP:HOLE Wikipedia:I wouldn't know him from a hole in the ground 14 +3483 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanya Kroytor User:Lacypaperclip 08:26, 23 November 2017 (UTC) keep There is an alternate spelling of this violinists last name Kroytnor. Kroitor If you search for the name Sanya Kroitor, there is a multitude of articles with significant coverage. I added these ones to the article tonight. {{cite web | title=Саня Кройтор: «Хайфа - уникальный город и уникальная публика!» Интервью после концерта. | website=Татьяна Климович | url=http://klim-reporter.com/sanya-kroytor-hayfa-unikalnyiy-gorod-i-unikalnaya-publika-intervyu-posle-kontserta.html | language=ru | access-date=23 November 2017}}{{cite web | last=Radio | first=Jazz | title=Sanya Kroitor, Didier Lockwood et Laetitia Himo en concert à Bastia ! | website=Jazz Radio | date=15 November 2016 | url=http://www.jazzradio.fr/news/soiree/32122/sanya-kroitor-didier-lockwood-et-laetitia-himo-en-concert--bastia | language=fr | access-date=23 November 2017}}{{cite web | last=Cashman | first=Greer Fay | title=Of synagogues and the communities they serve | website=The Jerusalem Post | JPost.com | date=9 July 2014 | url=http://www.jpost.com/Features/Magazine-Features/Of-synagogues-and-the-communities-they-serve-362027 | access-date=23 November 2017}} There are plrnty more. This article passes and should be kept. It needs to be expanded not deleted Deletion of Sanya Kroytor WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3484 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Carreon (2nd nomination) User:Colapeninsula 17:37, 12 June 2012 (UTC) comment While the sex.com lawsuit was very famous, inspiring a whole book, none of the other cases he was in seem to be significant. If either the RL.com or Oatmeal cases got significant wider press coverage, I'd say keep as someone who goes beyond . Is there anything to indicate they're notable? As for merging to Sex.com, there's nothing to merge Deletion of Charles Carreon (2nd nomination) WP:ONEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3485 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reign Supreme (2nd nomination) User:SummerPhD 03:36, 12 April 2012 (UTC) comment """Metal Injection is a |SPS, not a |reliable source. What someone else calls """"reliable"""" is not likely to be what Wikipedia considers """"|reliable""" Deletion of Reign Supreme (2nd nomination) WP:SPS||WP:RS||WP:RS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3486 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynx Equity Ltd User:HighKing 17:38, 10 September 2017 (UTC) delete """It is clear that the """"Keep"""" !voters above are misinterpreting the guidelines for notability, especially and . References derived from company PR, company announcements and normal business announcements do not meet the criteria for establishing notability since they are not """"intellectually"""" independent. The quantity of sources only suggests a functional PR department. {{u|ViktoriaCerena}} suggests that """"independent in-depth references from reliable sources"""" have been added but looking at the sources added, it is clear that while the sources may be independent, the articles are not since they rely almost exclusively on company material with no independent opinion or commentary. For example, http://www.privateequitywire.co.uk/2017/04/21/250911/howard-kennedy-advises-lynx-equity-second-uk-acquisition this added references from privateequitywire is not independent as it is a joint announcement from the company and the law firm that advised them on an acquisition and fails ORGIND and/or CORPDEPTH. https://www.pehub.com/canada/2016/2/need-to-meet-brad-nathan-president-of-lynx-equity/# This reference from pehub.com is an interview with the company president, offers no independent commentary or opinion, and fails CORPDEPTH and/or ORGIND. I could go on but you get the point""" Deletion of Lynx Equity Ltd WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3487 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frogfoot (South Africa) User:Xclusivzik 20:43, 25 July 2021 (UTC) keep featured in local well known press in South Africa https://www.news24.com/news24/SouthAfrica/Local/UD-News/frogfoot-fibre-now-in-despatch-and-uitenhage-20200916 News24,https://www.iol.co.za/news/south-africa/gauteng/frogfoot-partners-with-20-charities-across-sa-for-mandela-day-and-encourages-the-public-to-help-002ecac6-6849-49f6-b676-b253e4bdb9bc IOL, https://mybroadband.co.za/news/fibre/336432-where-frogfoot-will-launch-fibre-in-2020.html mybroadband, https://www.georgeherald.com/News/Article/Business/frogfoot-extends-fibre-network-in-george-202008261041 George Herald, this suggests the article is of importance. Plenty other reliable sources can be found through a Deletion of Frogfoot (South Africa) WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +3488 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anozie Ugochukwu Calistus User:Fenix 08:31, 27 March 2017 (UTC) delete Fails |NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a |fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy |GNG Deletion of Anozie Ugochukwu Calistus WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3489 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Pride User:Kicking222 12:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC) delete per nom. I also don't like persecuting CyberAnth, but in the same way, I don't like CyberAnth persecuting the nominator in this AfD. Throwing out these issues, there is still no evidence that Mary Pride meets Deletion of Mary Pride WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3490 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/24 Hours City Florist User:Ishdarian 06:29, 29 July 2014 (UTC) delete Fails . Trivial mentions, business directories, and a PR blurb won't cut it Deletion of 24 Hours City Florist WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3491 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Spatola User:Esradekan 08:57, 22 March 2009 (UTC) merge to the Hurt (band)|parent article per #Criteria for musicians and ensembles Deletion of Paul Spatola WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3492 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chloe Lynn User:Gene93k 00:00, 17 April 2015 (UTC) delete Unremarkable porn star. No claim of passing with no awards or RS-acknowledged contributions to porn. Fails without reliable source coverage. I couldn't even find coverage in the porn trade press Deletion of Chloe Lynn WP:PORNBIO||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3493 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Skinhead websites User:RJHall 18:33, 30 November 2005 (UTC) delete """per policy established with """"#Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files"""". &mdash""" Deletion of List of Skinhead websites WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3494 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost Train (2011 film) User:Hobbes 03:27, 15 October 2011 (UTC) delete Nothing about the company or participants in this project suggests that it would ever become notable, even if it ever does get filmed. Fails big-time--zero worthwhile Ghits. WP is not a and Deletion of Ghost Train (2011 film) WP:GNG||WP:CRYSTALBALL||WP:NOTPROMOTION Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3495 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sangeeth Kollam User:VeryCrocker 10:07, 13 April 2015 (UTC) delete as failing the |general notability guideline. It doesn't seem possible to even |verify the claimed screenwriting credits Deletion of Sangeeth Kollam WP:GNG||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3496 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Tyler User:Mallocks 16:49, 7 October 2005 (UTC) delete fails , has released no CDs either as solo or ensemble as near as I can make out Deletion of Philip Tyler WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3497 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Dearden User:Pdcook 22:55, 27 February 2010 (UTC) delete The article doesn't even really assert the subject's importance, and the given sources don't seem to indicate notability. I don't see any evidence that he is highly cited or has won any awards. Many of the sources in the article are associated with BBC and thus are not independent. One of the sources is a blog, and I don't think it's an expert blog that can be considered a |reliable source. I'm not sure what http://www.careers.cam.ac.uk/eReg/AccessDenied.asp?Requested=http://www.careers.cam.ac.uk/sectors/media/earlybioglist.asp this source is as I cannot access it. http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1GGLS_enUS311US311&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=Chris+Dearden+BBC A Google search turns up mostly the sources already in the article, but nothing that indicates notability per or in particular Deletion of Chris Dearden WP:RS||WP:BIO||WP:CREATIVE Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3498 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dean Bouzanis User:Davewild 08:53, 7 March 2008 (UTC) keep """The main criteria at is """"A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject"""". There appears to no dispute here that this article meets this criteria. The athlete additional criteria on BIO does not supersede this as BIO states that ref the additional criteria """"Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included""" Deletion of Dean Bouzanis WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3499 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sricharan Pakala User:Ab207 20:53, 31 August 2020 (UTC) keep """Per , {{tq|""""Has credit for writing or co-writing either lyrics or music for a notable composition.""""}}, which includes notable films and there are at least fifteen in this case. Also received coverage from sources such as The Hindu""" Deletion of Sricharan Pakala WP:COMPOSER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3500 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hammerax (2nd nomination) User:7 00:12, 17 November 2019 (UTC) keep No reason for a do-over. Reasons cited in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hammerax last nomination are sufficient. reserve No compliance with efore, which mandates that we are supposed to act on what the article ''could'' become, not what it was when nominated. Indeed, the cited sources NOW are ample to demonstrate Deletion of Hammerax (2nd nomination) WP:P||WP:B||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Portal 50 +3501 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parimatch (company) User:Atlantic306 01:25, 29 June 2021 (UTC) delete as a case of . This promotional article was created and edited by a number of undeclared paid editors who based the article upon promotional and unreliable sources so is not passed in my view Deletion of Parimatch (company) WP:PROMO||WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3502 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Gordon Neufeld User:Qworty 05:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC) delete Non-notable writer. His book fails Deletion of Kenneth Gordon Neufeld WP:BK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3503 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toyota's Best Doggone Zags Show User:AnmaFinotera 23:34, 21 May 2010 (UTC) delete Unnotable speciality show and apparently promotional piece. Fails with no significant coverage of this show Deletion of Toyota's Best Doggone Zags Show WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3504 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lightning Network User:Jtbobwaysf 03:58, 12 December 2019 (UTC) keep Frivolous nomination. Meets with sources from Bloomberg, Fortune (magazine), FT Alphaville, Daily Express, Ars Technica, Wired (magazine), Andreas Antonopoulos's books, etc. A lot of hits in google books as well https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&sxsrf=ACYBGNTdtghwKgCqM0rWJQk3D6Wnj0JWaA%3A1576122642181&ei=ErnxXZbhCoTi-Abuqof4Bg&q=%22lightning+network%22&oq=%22lightning+network%22&gs_l=psy-ab.3...327926.329765.0.329950.2.2.0.0.0.0.208.291.1j0j1.2.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..0.0.0....0.QRdnfI5Lr4Y. Silly nomination really, probably should be withdrawn Deletion of Lightning Network WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3505 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Napoleon Blownaparts User:Michig 11:37, 23 September 2017 (UTC) delete The vast majority of the content fails and the band doesn't appear to satisfy any of the criteria of . No significant coverage found in reliable sources Deletion of The Napoleon Blownaparts WP:V||WP:NBAND Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3506 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Islam-related terrorist attacks User:Malik 02:20, 11 April 2017 (UTC) delete """A classic |POVFORK. If it survives this AfD, I will load it with every """"Islam-related terrorist attack"""" committed by Christian, Jewish, or Hindu terrorists against Muslims or Islamic shrines. — """ Deletion of List of Islam-related terrorist attacks WP:POVFORK Wikipedia:Content forking 33 +3507 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marline Barberena User:Otr500 13:30, 17 September 2016 (UTC) merge """Come on people. She is not """"independently"""" Wikipedia:Notability|notable and everyone on this page knows this or will directly. She won one title and that is why we have policy about this. It is not just about the fact that there are """"sources"""". The only way we can justify keeping a one time national winner of one event is to |ignore all the rules. The purpose of that """"rule"""" is so there are not undue restrictions, that hamper improvements to Wikipedia, and not to allow articles that will very likely forever be a stub biography article, about a person that won one title. This does not improve Wikipedia. '''Note''': If we do consider """"source"""" There are three references listed. #1)- Please look at first one used in the article. I used a translator but the title appears to be ''Miss Nicaragua statement'' and concerns """"Miss Nastassja Bolivar"""" and mentions """"Mrs. Olga Isabel Cifuentes"""" and """"Miss Nicaragua 2014"""", with nothing I could find about the subject. #2)- The second reference is a primary source of """"Beauty Pageant News"""", and #3)- The third is a Spanish Wikipedia entry that is not a reference. This means there is one primary source related to the one event. This discussion is WP:!VOTE|not a vote count but closure is to be based on the merits of the discussion, reasoning, and olicies and guidelines. In light of this evidence this is clearly a redirect unless someone can offer more substantial reasoning""" Deletion of Marline Barberena WP:IGNORE||WP:P Wikipedia:Ignore all rules 63 +3508 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McMillan Fire User:Alex 07:55, 30 June 2019 (UTC) delete Ordinary local news Deletion of McMillan Fire WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3509 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Paper Mario series characters (2nd nomination) User:Zxcvbnm 23:35, 2 December 2009 (UTC) delete Wikipedia has a policy against listing minor characters without citations. All major characters are already at Paper Mario (series) and the series doesn't need an in-depth character list. Listing all minor characters and enemies like this is practically material. Finally, the people who keep arguing to keep the article are completely unwilling to clean it up, probably because doing so is practically impossible without any external references besides game guides and the game itself. Unless there is cultural significance, articles about characters belong in FAQs, specialized Wikis and the like Deletion of List of Paper Mario series characters (2nd nomination) WP:GAMEGUIDE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3510 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majority Plus User:NinjaRobotPirate 01:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC) delete It's difficult to determine whether older topics were never notable or if they just faded into obscurity. In the case of bands, there's usually some kind of evidence in digitized sources and retrospectives. I see a trivial mention in https://books.google.com/books?id=yCRlCwAAQBAJ&lpg=PT233&ots=yZ5lW21365&dq=%22Majority%20Plus%22%20merseybeat&pg=PT233#v=onepage&q=%22Majority%20Plus%22%20merseybeat&f=false this book, and there are a few Merseybeat fan sites that mention the band, such as http://www.liverpoolbeat.com/rocknroll/majority-plus/ this one. It would be nice if we could keep this article, as the creator apparently made it as a tribute to his grandfather, but there doesn't seem to be significant coverage in |reliable sources. If someone can locate offline coverage, such as in contemporary newspapers, the article can be recreated Deletion of Majority Plus WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3511 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regard (DJ) User:The 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC) keep """does meet the """"Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart"""" criteria of , specifically for """"Ride It"""" which was number 2 on the https://www.officialcharts.com/chart-news/tones-i-takes-on-regard-for-this-weeks-number-1__27374/ official UK charts. It does appear that Regard might be a """"one-hit wonder"""" as this appears to be the only significant things he's done. But he is covered in multiple |reliable sources, so does meet as well, for example coverage in https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-49856548 BBC, https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-features/jay-sean-ride-it-regard-viral-tiktok-876545/ Rolling Stone, https://celebmix.com/exclusive-interview-dj-regard-discusses-the-success-behind-ride-it/ Celeb Mix. The article is poorly written, but the subject is, I think, notable""" Deletion of Regard (DJ) WP:NMUSIC||WP:RS||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3512 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Smith (ice hockey, born 1951) User:Hirolovesswords 06:36, 12 January 2014 (UTC) delete """Not sure if the CHL is considered a """"top-level minor league"""", but either way the subject of the article played less than 200 and did not achieve any preeminent honors, so he fails . Has not received enough significant coverage to pass GNG either""" Deletion of Dave Smith (ice hockey, born 1951) WP:NHOCKEY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3513 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buck’s Store Museum User:Lightburst 01:02, 10 September 2020 (UTC) delete or '''Merge''' per Onel5969.s suggestion. I had hoped I would be able to dig up some newsprint from 1888-present, but I searched every way possible and found none. As it is this is a local curiosity and perhaps a source of pride for a small community. As -M would fit with our policy Deletion of Buck’s Store Museum WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +3514 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert M. Bernstein User:Qworty 01:32, 29 January 2011 (UTC) comment With all due respect, I have to point out that none of the links you provide constitute for the purpose of establishing . First of all, not a single one of the links is ABOUT Bernstein. They are about hair transplantation, not Bernstein. They might indicate that hair transplantation is notable, not Bernstein. But I would argue that they don't even indicate that much, because four of these links do not constitute of any kind. They are primary, non-neutral sources, not secondary, neutral sources. They aren't news stories--they're nothing more than press releases about each TV network's own programming. They are, in effect, advertising rather than news reporting. Since they are neither secondary nor impartial, they cannot be used as Deletion of Robert M. Bernstein WP:RS||WP:N||WP:RS||WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3515 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yves Chaudron [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']] 06:25, 6 June 2013 (UTC) keep per . I've just added a bunch of sources and information. The guy has been the subject of a large number of books and news articles and probably passes points 1 and 3, simply of the basis of his significant works of art - 6 carbon copies of the Mona Lisa impressive enough to fool a bunch of people and sell for $300k a piece (in 1911; millions in today's money Deletion of Yves Chaudron WP:BEFORE||WP:ARTIST Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +3516 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vegoia and Egeria NONE NONE delete It should be noted that this is the work of a new editor who may need some help becoming familiar with WP policies and guidelines. The essay seems to be a content fork from the new article Vegoia; both show many many |Manual of Style issues, which also need to be addressed. I see the following grounds for deletion Deletion of Vegoia and Egeria WP:MOS Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +3517 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mapping (fandom) User:Bearian 22:00, 1 December 2020 (UTC) comment I am a mapper, so I'd like some of it kept somewhere, but the current article |truly terrible. I'd be willing to take on the project. I'm happy with a soft redirect or userfy it Deletion of Mapping (fandom) WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +3518 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of info-gap decision theory User:JJL 01:12, 20 March 2009 (UTC) delete essay based on one (?) theory that argues a specific POV Deletion of Criticism of info-gap decision theory WP:FRINGE Wikipedia:Fringe theories 44 +3519 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikhail Volkenshtein User:Terence 11:49, 7 March 2006 (UTC) keep meets Deletion of Mikhail Volkenshtein WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3520 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Basalaj User:Sir 14:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC) delete per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails and Deletion of Scott Basalaj WP:NSPORT||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3521 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Smith (footballer born September 1985) (2nd nomination) User:RGTraynor 14:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC) delete Fails . The Keep proponents base their POV on the premise that Smith plays for a fully professional club, but this is what, fifth rung, and that only barely Deletion of James Smith (footballer born September 1985) (2nd nomination) WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3522 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willowbrook Mall (Wayne, New Jersey) User:Alansohn 22:24, 23 July 2006 (UTC) keep at 1.5 million sq. ft. of selling area, it's the second largest mall in the state (not minor) and one of the earliest fully-enclosed large scale malls (notable). Article meets , without any explanation of what criteria are not being met Deletion of Willowbrook Mall (Wayne, New Jersey) WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3523 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wipe Your Eyes (2nd nomination) User:onel5969 23:59, 7 January 2021 (UTC) merge all, none meet Deletion of Wipe Your Eyes (2nd nomination) WP:NSONGS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3524 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Dench User:Exok 10:44, 12 January 2012 (UTC) keep Number and variety of sources indicate notability per Deletion of Peter Dench WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3525 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mancala networks user:czarkoff 17:28, 16 August 2012 (UTC) delete WP:B2B|B2B company with no |slightest difference from the generic company of a kind. |Awards don't help if there is nothing to write about. —  Deletion of Mancala networks WP:MILL||WP:NBIZ Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill 32 +3526 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rheneas User:Reyk 14:11, 26 August 2020 (UTC) merge Recent AfDs of these TtTE characters have pretty much all determined that they're crufty and not individually notable, and this is no exception. It's probably safe to just |boldly redirect them going forward Deletion of Rheneas WP:BOLD Wikipedia:Be bold 78 +3527 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brook Run Skate Park User:Cube 19:04, 6 March 2008 (UTC) keep Significant coverage in multiple articles in the AJC. Satisfies Deletion of Brook Run Skate Park WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3528 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maf, Shamkir User:Cunard 22:22, 22 October 2009 (UTC) comment """I've relisted this debate because none of the participants voting """"keep"""" have |verified that Maf, Shamkir exists and should be redirected to Şəmkir""" Deletion of Maf, Shamkir WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3529 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dating Guy (2nd nomination) User:Till 14:32, 26 January 2013 (UTC) delete The analysis of the sources shows that this topic doesn't have enough significant coverage and fails Deletion of The Dating Guy (2nd nomination) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3530 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheki Arzaga User:Hzh 15:57, 23 January 2019 (UTC) merge to MNL48. Same rationale as with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sela Guia|Sela Guia - per , {{tquote|members of notable bands are redirected to the band's article, not given individual articles, unless they have demonstrated individual notability for activity independent of the band, such as solo releases.}} The article can be recreated when she has achieved notability as an individual Deletion of Sheki Arzaga WP:NBAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3531 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inner family archetypes User:Pigman 04:20, 21 September 2007 (UTC) delete I feel strongly this amounts to |original research if it is not a more widely recognized descriptive paradigm Deletion of Inner family archetypes WP:NOR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3532 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aircraft of Ace Combat User:Nenyedi 16:22, 15 August 2007 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Aircraft of Ace Combat WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3533 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Olson User:Cbl62 05:05, 4 September 2012 (UTC) keep College football players who receive significant non-trivial coverage in mainstream media sources pass . If they receive such coverage in national media outlets, they also pass . Although either one suffices, Olson appears to have received enough coverage to pass both standards. He also played at the highest level of the college sports as the starting quarterback at UCLA and was named the AT&T All-America Player of the Week for the opening week of the 2007 season. http://www.uclabruins.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/090207aae.html Examples of coverage include: (1) http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1113980/index.htm Sports Illustrated feature on Olson, (2) http://www.thefreelibrary.com/WUNDERKIND+THOUSAND+OAKS+QUARTERBACK+BEN+OLSON+HAS+INGREDIENTS+OF...-a083400140 Los Angeles Daily News feature on Olson, (3) http://www.ocregister.com/sports/benolson-48074-rickneuheisel-uclabruins.html Orange County Register feature on Olson, (4) http://www.deseretnews.com/article/600155699/Ex-next-great-BYU-QB-loving-life-at-UCLA.html?pg=all Deseret News, (5) http://www.deseretnews.com/article/695207282/Just-another-game-BYU-Bruins-QB-Ben-Olson-vow-to-keep-Saturdays-game-in-perspective.html?pg=all Deseret News, (6) http://www.aolnews.com/2008/08/10/ucla-qb-ben-olsons-foot-hates-football/ AOL News, (7) http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=2556846 ESPN, http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3055138 ESPN, (8) http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=2618840 ESPN, (9) http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/story/10927102/2 CBS Sports, (10) http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/26128220/ MSNBC, (11) http://articles.latimes.com/2005/aug/28/sports/sp-uclarep28 Los Angeles Times, (12) http://articles.latimes.com/2004/dec/30/sports/sp-olson30 Los Angeles Times, (13) http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/730497571.html?dids=730497571:730497571&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Nov+05%2C+2004&author=Lonnie+White&pub=Los+Angeles+Times&desc=Ben+Olson+May+Return+to+Southland%3B+Quarterback+from+Thousand+Oaks+who+left+BYU+to+go+on+a+two-year+Mormon+mission+will+attend+UCLA+game+Saturday.+USC+is+also+on+his+list.&pqatl=google Los Angeles Times, (14) http://articles.latimes.com/2008/aug/11/sports/sp-ucla11 Los Angeles Times, (15) http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2008/Nov/19/br/hawaii81119005.html Honolulu Advertiser, (16) http://seattletimes.com/html/collegesports/2008109565_grid13.html Seattle Times, (17) http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/pac10/2008-04-25-ucla-qb-injuries_N.htm USA Today, (18) http://ucla.scout.com/2/332986.html Bruin Report Online Deletion of Ben Olson WP:GNG||WP:NCOLLATH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3534 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stadium Rave User:Esradekan 23:32, 14 April 2009 (UTC) delete fails notability per #Songs. No awards, no chart, no covers, no Deletion of Stadium Rave WP:MUSIC||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3535 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windswept House: A Vatican Novel User:Bbb23 15:12, 26 December 2011 (UTC) comment """The NYT article is repeated by two editors. The Forbes quote is unsupported by Anthony, although it may indeed be verifiable. Publishers Weekly and Kirkus Reviews review almost every book that's published. Anthony, Martin ''does'' have his own article. This is the book we're talking about, not the author. Despite your statement, Anthony, about """"motive"""", you just recently tried to restore the offensive and policy non-compliant material about who each character equates to in real life (according to the author and whatever sources support the """"key""""). Unfortunately, the |notability guideline for having a book article at Wikipedia is very low. The only criterion this particular book could fit into is the reviews, and it's a close call. I would exclude Kirkus and PW for the reason stated above, and we are left with the Times and the Spartunburg papers (can't address the Forbes reference because I haven't seen the review, if indeed it's a review). I don't think the coverage is pervasive enough or of significant depth to include the book. I remind everyone that it is only a guideline and can be overridden by consensus: """"meeting these criteria is not an absolute guarantee that Wikipedia should have a separate, stand-alone article entirely dedicated to the book"""" and """"It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply""" Deletion of Windswept House: A Vatican Novel WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3536 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pagat.com User:2005 05:17, 12 March 2007 (UTC) keep Plainly meets . The website is the preeminent card games website on the Internet, with literally thousands of non-trivial online references from the International Playing Card Society on down. Please do some research before making afd's... added... and also the random removal of links added by many different editors that clearly meet calls this whole afd into question. Please act responsibly Deletion of Pagat.com WP:WEB||WP:EL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3537 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ananda yoga User:MuZemike 01:26, 18 December 2008 (UTC) comment I understand, from the reasons above for keeping, that the subject is likely notable. However, articles written as clear advertisement or copyright violations are reasons for deletion (see the |deletion policy). The article requires a complete rewrite to remove said offending material. It is also against official policy to engage in copyright infringement, which is what has happened above. With all that said, I stand by G11, and I will also flag the article for potential copyvio Deletion of Ananda yoga WP:DEL Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +3538 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TopCashBack User:K 01:26, 4 March 2018 (UTC) delete does not meet / . Sourcing is mostly , resulting in a highly promotional article, violating Deletion of TopCashBack WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NCORP||WP:SPIP||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3539 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Climb a Volcano User:Whpq 18:05, 24 November 2006 (UTC) delete I don't know whether this is a hoax or not, but then that's why articles need to be able to meet which this article fails to do Deletion of Climb a Volcano WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3540 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Laughery NONE NONE keep I admit that I was at first skeptical about this gentleman's notability; however I have managed to uncover some relevant source information, which if included in a revision of the Article, would lead me to support keeping it (per and Deletion of Greg Laughery WP:AUTHOR||WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3541 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Golf Courses in Jacksonville, Florida User:Northamerica1000 02:47, 6 September 2011 (UTC) keep """spaced ndash}}Per Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_directory|Wikipedia is not a directory, the article's inclusion on Wikipedia is appropriate, as the article has an organized focus and is not, per Wikipedia directory guidelines, like """"Lists or repositories of loosely associated topics"""". The article passes all eight points of . Furthermore, the article can also serve to promote the creation of new articles for notable golf courses""" Deletion of List of Golf Courses in Jacksonville, Florida WP:NOTDIR Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3542 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Elisabeth Maria of Bavaria User:Bearian 20:42, 30 July 2020 (UTC) delete per and Deletion of Princess Elisabeth Maria of Bavaria WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3543 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fritz Pflaum Hut User:7 13:53, 7 December 2015 (UTC) keep Clearly a notable and noted structure and an important waypoint for climbers. Given its high perch and relative inaccessibility, the amount of coverage is telling. Moreover, there was no compliance with efore Deletion of Fritz Pflaum Hut WP:B Wikipedia:Bots 91 +3544 """Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/""""Juiced ball"""" theory""" User:12 13:52, 4 January 2008 (UTC) comment """Seeing as the speedy tagger (DS2434) has opined as """"keep"""" and the above , would a passing third party please close this discussion as one big misunderstood """"keep"""". Regards""" """Deletion of """"Juiced ball"""" theory""" WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +3545 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Kropschot (2nd nomination) User:SportingFlyer 07:14, 27 September 2018 (UTC) delete Fails , . Very poorly sourced article Deletion of Joseph Kropschot (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:NMMA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3546 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omar Carabalí User:Hmlarson 04:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC) keep per a super-easy Google News search. Article could use expansion and improved referencing, not deletion per Deletion of Omar Carabalí WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +3547 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brock Lichthardt User:LACaliNYC 22:03, 29 July 2018 (UTC) delete Clearly fails the , and Deletion of Brock Lichthardt WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3548 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ong Tze Ch'in User:Mztourist 05:06, 25 August 2021 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Ong Tze Ch'in WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3549 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radial balance User:Freshacconci 20:07, 25 March 2017 (UTC) delete Definitely falls under . A google search indicates that the word is being used out there in the design world, and there are blogs and Prezis discussing it. However, per , there are no actual sources that I can find beyond the blogs. Since there's not much there and no sources, best to delete and someone can create this in a few years if it begins to appear in reliable sources Deletion of Radial balance WP:NOTDIC||WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +3550 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghulam Kibria Khaki User:Maashatra11 12:08, 9 June 2010 (UTC) delete Fails wp:N and wp:V. No sources provided, doesn't meet the notability criteria for authors ( Deletion of Ghulam Kibria Khaki WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3551 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaping Your Child's Sexual Identity User:Softlavender 20:22, 10 May 2015 (UTC) delete Does not assert any notability and does not pass Deletion of Shaping Your Child's Sexual Identity WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3552 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Comics Journal interview subjects User:Otto4711 12:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC) comment First, to the person who's accusing me of colluding with Harlan Ellison, rest assured that I have no knowledge of said suit. The lawsuit or lack of same has nothing to do with this nomination and the notion that a lawsuit could somehow be influenced by the existence or non-existence of a list of interview subjects is ludicrous. Second, I have explained the reason for the nomination, which is that #DIR|Wikipedia is not a directory. That a number of people were interviewed by the same publication does not create the sort of association that would warrant an article. Compliance with , which is a guideline and not policy, is irrelevant if the list itself fails , which is policy. Third, |It's useful is an incredibly poor reason for keeping an article. All sorts of things that all sorts of people find useful get deleted off Wikipedia every day. Finally, is also a horrible reason for keeping an article. If other articles which don't meet Wikipedia policy and guidelines exist, then the proper response to them is to deleted them, not to point to them in an attempt to save other non-compliant articles Deletion of List of Comics Journal interview subjects WP:NOT||WP:LIST||WP:NOT||WP:USEFUL||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3553 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davenport (rock band) NONE NONE delete Article created by band, one Google hit for band name + (probably self-released) album title, does not meet Deletion of Davenport (rock band) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3554 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FeelTheDeal [[User: Allen3|Allen3]]'' [[User talk:Allen3|talk]] 17:59, 9 December 2005 (UTC) delete as per #Wikipedia is not a propaganda machine|Wikipedia is not a propaganda machine. The site is either too new or has too little traffic to generate an Alexa rating.http://www.alexa.com/data/details/?url=www.feelthedeal.com A Google search turns up a handful of mentions to the site in chatrooms, but nothing resembling a |reliable source for the information in the article Deletion of FeelTheDeal WP:NOT||WP:RS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3555 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Culp [[User talk:204.126.132.231|talk]]) 19:55, 26 November 2013 (UTC) delete Doesn't seem to meet either or . Special:Contributions/204.126.132.231|204.126.132.231 Deletion of Brian Culp WP:NBASEBALL||WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3556 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vicariously User:First 05:40, 11 September 2010 (UTC) delete """Does not come close to meeting , because it hasn't """"received significant coverage in Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources that are Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent of the subject""" Deletion of Vicariously WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3557 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wonders in civilization IV User:Masem 15:56, 30 November 2008 (UTC) delete Clearly material. Brief mention of a few examples should be placed in the game's article Deletion of Wonders in civilization IV WP:GAMEGUIDE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3558 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymonde Allain User:Bakazaka 05:08, 8 January 2019 (UTC) keep The first hit of a Google Books search (which should be part of any ) finds an academic source with multiple pages discussing Allain, including the extensive and unusual press coverage she received at the time, with additional citations to sources for followup (''The Force of Beauty: Transforming French Ideas of Femininity in the Third Republic'' https://books.google.com/books?id=duW6CAAAQBAJ Deletion of Raymonde Allain WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +3559 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protoss User:Jay32183 01:53, 4 September 2007 (UTC) delete Does not have significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources, fails Deletion of Protoss WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3560 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-retweeted tweets (2nd nomination) User:Ahiijny 03:40, 17 February 2019 (UTC) keep """Just stumbled across this AfD from googling """"what is the most liked tweet of all time"""". The concept of most retweeted tweets meets . I don't see why the list of most-liked Tweets was deleted either; I'd think that these two would easily meet NLIST, especially for a social media site as popular as Twitter e.g. https://www.euronews.com/2019/01/07/what-are-the-most-retweeted-tweets-of-all-time https://www.theweek.co.uk/98782/the-five-most-popular-tweets-of-all-time https://mashable.com/article/most-retweeted-tweet-billionaire/#7Kf29vErUmqd https://www.businessinsider.com/10-most-liked-tweets-of-all-time-2017-8 https://techacute.com/list-most-liked-tweets/ http://time.com/4263227/most-popular-tweets/). Compare List of most-viewed YouTube videos, List of most-liked YouTube videos (currently also up for AfD), List of most-disliked YouTube videos""" Deletion of List of most-retweeted tweets (2nd nomination) WP:NLIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3561 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesuit European Social Centre User:Newshunter12 10:02, 22 September 2018 (UTC) delete This article fails and for there is not enough to demonstrate the organization is notable, or much of any coverage for that matter. Wikipedia isn't the place to advertise non-notable charity groups either Deletion of Jesuit European Social Centre WP:NCORP||WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3562 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Dines User:BrownHairedGirl 15:07, 16 September 2012 (UTC) delete The orphaned status of the article is cause for concern, but it is not a reason for deletion. However, I can't see that Dines meets , and he seems to fall short of . Two of the references are to non-trivial articles http://www.hkclubbing.com/articles/nightlife/kris-lopez-in-da-house-in-hong-kong.html, http://themst.com/interviews/from-spiritual-house-to-human-potential-exclusive-interview-with-christopher-dines, but the first doesn't look like a reliable source and second of the two is a blog Deletion of Christopher Dines WP:MUSIC||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3563 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Addison User:Lonehexagon 02:31, 31 May 2018 (UTC) keep """I incorporated the references given abovehttps://www.allmusic.com/artist/susan-addison-mn0001320806https://www.discogs.com/artist/1073043-Susan-Addisonhttps://www.theguardian.com/music/tomserviceblog/2009/nov/20/elgar-trombonehttp://news.bbc.co.uk/local/berkshire/hi/front_page/newsid_8534000/8534682.stm as well as one more from the Independent.https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/classical/news/great-composer-shame-he-couldnt-play-1824125.html I think she passes for significant discussion in secondary sources that are independent of the subject. She is known for her research in historical trombones (as indicated by the discussion in the articles above about her research work with Edward Elgar's trombone) and was awarded an Hon.RAM from the Royal Academy of Music in 2002, which may not quite satisfy but I think it does add a little bit to her notability. I also added several references to verify each piece of information in the article. However, the most strong reason I believe the article passes the notability test is due to because the subject """"is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles."""" She was a founding member and principle trombone player for the Orchestra of the Age of Enlightenment, and a founding member and 25-year player of His Majestys Sagbutts & Cornetts""" Deletion of Susan Addison WP:GNG||WP:NACADEMIC||WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3564 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheeks (Multimedia Artist) User:VernoWhitney 21:28, 17 February 2010 (UTC) delete WP:ENTERTAINER directs us to which he fails. The title song to Side Effect would only make him notable if Side Effect itself was notable Deletion of Cheeks (Multimedia Artist) WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3565 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of albums considered the best User:Clarityfiend 10:18, 3 August 2014 (UTC) keep but clean up. The media keep churning out these album lists, so it deserves to be here. However, the median ranking business is . I'd rather go with albums in the top 10 on at least one component listing. Also, get rid of some of the weaker sources Deletion of List of albums considered the best WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3566 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Rita Centura User:onel5969 18:20, 4 February 2021 (UTC) delete searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage. Fails or . There's also the UPE issue Deletion of Anna Rita Centura WP:GNG||WP:NARTIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3567 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. A. Khan (academician) User:Phil 17:02, 23 May 2012 (UTC) comment """I contested deletion because I thought that there was an important issue of interpretation here that requires discussion. When criterion 6 refers to a """"major academic institution"""" does it mean a world-renowned research institution, which Ranchi University may not be, or an institution that teaches lots of students, which it certainly is""" Deletion of A. A. Khan (academician) WP:PROD||WP:PROF Wikipedia:Proposed deletion 92 +3568 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandigarh Hand Ball Association User:ToonLucas22 01:46, 1 March 2015 (UTC) delete per |CSD A7 and '''Salt''' as recreation of Chandigarh Handball Association Deletion of Chandigarh Hand Ball Association WP:A7 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +3569 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zack Vank User:wknight94 12:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC) delete I've also added a |prod tag to Dooney which was created by the same author (who will be indefblocked unless one of these three articles proves to have some validity Deletion of Zack Vank WP:PROD Wikipedia:Proposed deletion 92 +3570 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Elliot Orr User:MA 20:49, 16 July 2019 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Matthew Elliot Orr WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3571 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guardians of Ga'Hoole Book 15: The War of the Ember NONE NONE delete fails Deletion of Guardians of Ga'Hoole Book 15: The War of the Ember WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3572 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Ward User:GiantSnowman 20:20, 26 November 2020 (UTC) keep meets and there is sourcing out there, see e.g. https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news/scott-ward-mark-hunter-luton-life-after-ecstasy-agony-sport-a8577951.html this from the Independent as well as https://www.cityam.com/former-footballer-scott-ward-launches-new-scheme-ey-support/ this and https://www.standard.co.uk/sport/olympic-rowing-champion-mark-hunter-and-exfootballer-scott-ward-helping-stars-prepare-for-life-after-a4095716.html?fallback=true this, all just from a very quick Google search Deletion of Scott Ward WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3573 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disneyland Dubai User:Unscented 16:52, 4 August 2009 (UTC) delete http://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1B2GGFB_enCA225#rlz=1B2GGFB_enCA225&hl=en&q=%22disneyland+dubai%22&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=%22disneyland+dubai%22&aqi=&fp=-Pw1cEIpNGU Google and http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=%22disneyland%20dubai%22&rlz=1B2GGFB_enCA225&sa=N&tab=wn&um=1 Google News do not reveal any |reliable sources for the article, and |Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. However, as the article concerns a theme park to be built in the United Arab Emirates, it's possible that there are sources in Arabic that aren't showing up from an English Google search Deletion of Disneyland Dubai WP:CRYSTAL||WP:reliable sources Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3574 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Beightol User:Gonzo_fan2007 16:38, 16 February 2021 (UTC) keep per {{U|Usernameunique}}. Seems to be enough to meet Deletion of Larry Beightol WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3575 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 603 User:Colonel 09:29, 14 February 2009 (UTC) keep The article has been merged which is a sensible alternative to deletion per Deletion of London Buses route 603 WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +3576 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 Atlantic Sun Conference men's soccer season User:GiantSnowman 15:13, 4 March 2018 (UTC) delete unsourced, no evidence of notability ( failure Deletion of 2013 Atlantic Sun Conference men's soccer season WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3577 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bus routes in North Yorkshire User:Beagel 14:37, 26 March 2013 (UTC) delete per Deletion of List of bus routes in North Yorkshire WP:NOTTRAVEL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3578 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamal Orlando Omar Ibrahim User:GB 01:47, 17 May 2010 (UTC) delete The article has a credible verifiable claim to importance in the article which is all that it takes to fail #a7. That said, I can find nothing to establish notability. The only thing I have found is the Mr. World title with no significant coverage in reliable sources Deletion of Kamal Orlando Omar Ibrahim WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +3579 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KidsClick Schedule Changes User:Mrschimpf 21:17, 5 January 2018 (UTC) delete Oh hell no, . Definitely a reaction to KidsClick editors trying to keep that article from becoming an unfiltered . Also a to {{user|Philblue7}} who still hasn't gotten the point of why we keep this cruft out of articles (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Philblue7&diff=808611642&oldid=808227918 my warning to them from November 3rd, for instance). In addition it's all unsourced, and as I have re-iterated to the user several times, stations can air the programming whenever they want, so the times are '''not''' universal Deletion of KidsClick Schedule Changes WP:NOTTVGUIDE||WP:ADVERT||WP:TROUT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3580 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edith Espie User:RebeccaGreen 14:49, 3 December 2019 (UTC) keep I don't agree that having a street named after you gives presumed notability, but I believe that she meets . This article has been further improved with more sources. I have been meaning to go to the Northern Territory Library to check the books given as sources, and I will still try to do that Deletion of Edith Espie WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3581 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Trooper (card game) User:JIP 05:25, 3 September 2011 (UTC) delete no claims to notability, no references. Might just as well be |made up at school one day Deletion of Super Trooper (card game) WP:MADEUP Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +3582 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salman Mohammad Abdullah User:WikiDan61 17:13, 26 January 2015 (UTC) comment The issue at hand here is not popularity or fame, it is the very strict concept of |notability as defined at Wikipedia. Wikipedia requires that the subject of an article has been the subject of multiple instances of significant coverage in independent media, so that we have unbiased source material from which to build the Wikipedia article. In the absence of such source material, the subject's popularity is irrelevant. If we have no material from which to build an article, then we cannot have the article Deletion of Salman Mohammad Abdullah WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3583 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robyn Maby User:Flibirigit 01:26, 23 January 2018 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Robyn Maby WP:GNG||WP:NHOCKEY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3584 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quran code (4th nomination) User:Chalst 13:07, 15 July 2021 (UTC) keep it's an unconvincing write-up of a dubious concept and most of the sources that exist for it highlight the topsy-turvy lingo we have where calls them ''reliable'', however, the concept is sufficiently visible, the sourcing goes beyond what is appropriate for a section of the Rashad Khalifa article and the Martin Gardner articles show that it is possible to write both well and objectively about the topic and the text analysis article I gave is also usable. I'd nominate {{u|Trijnstel}} for except this is her first AfD nom in 8 years: even with a no consensus result at AfD, one should normally wait at least six weeks before nominating unless there is an exceptional rationale: so soon after a keep close with no new information, the right thing to do is to challenge the close on . I found {{u|Barkeep49}}'s close uncharacteristically weak: {{u| Eggishorn}} made a strong OR case that was not refuted, and the nom {{u|Hemiauchenia}}'s case that the sourcing was too weak to justify recreation was not really disputed; ''no consensus'' or relisting would have been better options. &mdash Deletion of Quran code (4th nomination) WP:V||WP:TROUT||WP:TNT||WP:DRV Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3585 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Complete Discocrappy User:Neranei 19:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC) delete """The article is somewhat POV """"making it hard to get through the entire album in one sustained listening session"""", and, according to the article, wasn't charted. According to , if the band that made the album is notable, the album may be notable, but Charles Bronson is borderline, seeing as their article is going through an AfD as well""" Deletion of Complete Discocrappy WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3586 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommy Sowers User:GlassCobra 15:44, 14 October 2009 (UTC) delete per , running candidates not yet notable (, etc Deletion of Tommy Sowers WP:POLITICIAN||WP:CRYSTALBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3587 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former Chinese throne User:Coolabahapple 04:08, 5 July 2017 (UTC) keep meets , well referenced article Deletion of Line of succession to the former Chinese throne WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3588 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of population milestones by country User:Nwlaw63 16:55, 3 January 2016 (UTC) delete The article topic itself (and how the whole article is structured) is a hopeless case of Deletion of List of population milestones by country WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3589 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strensham services (2nd nomination) User:Amalthea 11:23, 17 August 2008 (UTC) delete I do not share the opinion of the AfD I quoted that motorway service stations are inherently notable, comparable with train stations. It fails lacking significant coverage. Probably candidate for G4 since it was previously deleted on grounds of notability, too Deletion of Strensham services (2nd nomination) WP:NOTE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3590 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miles Routledge User:Shannon 21:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC) keep Routledge has been covered by multiple major publications as part of a significant event, which is good enough for . Whether Routledge's actions are foolish or immoral is irrelevant; many foolish and immoral people have Wikipedia pages Deletion of Miles Routledge WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +3591 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King's Lynn in popular culture User:Themfromspace 23:43, 16 June 2009 (UTC) delete in its current form. The subject lacks notability and the content consists of nothing but |trivial details Deletion of King's Lynn in popular culture WP:TRIVIA Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +3592 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strategic Marketing Inc. User:HighKing 18:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC) delete Fails GNG and Deletion of Strategic Marketing Inc. WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3593 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAR Technology User:HighKing 19:59, 9 January 2018 (UTC) delete No indications of notability, references fail the criteria for establishing notability,in particular they are not *intellectually* independent and fail . References that rely on company announcements fail Deletion of PAR Technology WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3594 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bindi Mwerre Anthurre Artists User:Cabrils 04:55, 13 December 2019 (UTC) keep """I've just added 4 substantive articles from ''The Australian'' (national newspaper): Rothwell, Nicolas (25 April 2006). """"Shifting landscapes"""". The Australian; Canberra. p. 14.; Rothwell, Nicolas (26 March 2004). """"Barriers given the brush"""". The Australian; Canberra. p. 17.; Rothwell, Nicolas (13 September 2012). """"Desert Mob lays out the legacy"""". The Australian; Canberra. p. 15; Rothwell, Nicolas (11 April 2008). """"The dark wings of desire"""". The Australian; Canberra. p. 14. And 3 articles from state papers mentioning exhibitions. I'm confident Bindi satisfies . — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by""" Deletion of Bindi Mwerre Anthurre Artists WP:IRS||WP:CORP Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3595 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Wilkie User:Darryl 18:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC) keep I am not sure this articles' topic has obtained , but I will say our hypocrisy in these discussions is deafening. It is clear that there is one set of rules for Green leaders and another for Liberal and NDP leaders (who also lack representation in a provincial legislature). If those articles are a '''Keep''', removing this one is simple hypocrisy. For examples, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveed Anwar, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mackenzie Thomason, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darrin Lamoureux and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naomi Hunter Deletion of Jordan Wilkie WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3596 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iqbal Masood Nadvi User:Xxanthippe 11:04, 10 September 2016 (UTC) delete No evidence of passing rof. Claims for should be explicated Deletion of Iqbal Masood Nadvi WP:P||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Portal 50 +3597 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaheen Peerbhai User:GPL93 23:08, 21 March 2020 (UTC) delete Fails and . Best Deletion of Shaheen Peerbhai WP:GNG||WP:NAUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3598 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Najarian User:Willsome429 16:17, 15 January 2020 (UTC) keep meets number 1 as he has played multiple National Football League games as evidenced by https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/N/NajaPe20.htm Deletion of Peter Najarian WP:NGRIDIRON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3599 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlas Honda User:K 22:22, 18 February 2017 (UTC) keep """largest manufacturer"""" is a sufficient claim to notability; the company is as well. The article is not terribly promotional at this stage; I removed self-citations""" Deletion of Atlas Honda WP:LISTED Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3600 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xtube (2nd nomination) [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']] 02:54, 2 June 2013 (UTC) keep on the basis of my comment above and the sources listed by DGG. If those sources aren't in the article, add them, per Deletion of Xtube (2nd nomination) WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +3601 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex swing User:Flyer22 04:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC) comment Wikipedia articles are supposed to be based on their coverage in eliable sources. Do see otability. The above keep arguments are weak Deletion of Sex swing WP:R||WP:N Wikipedia:Redirect 73 +3602 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walid Phares User:Twp 17:13, 10 April 2009 (UTC) delete """Problematic article made thornier by the strong possibility of |conflict of interest edits: repeated edits by {{user|Futureofterrorismproject}} (note that """"Future Jihad"""" appears to be one of Walid Phares' pet projects""" Deletion of Walid Phares WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +3603 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Da Bulldogs User:CheCheDaWaff 18:50, 23 October 2016 (UTC) delete """This article isn't notable as there isn't any """"significant coverage"""" () in the one reference present""" Deletion of Da Bulldogs WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3604 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gavin Keohane User:Placeholder 03:32, 7 May 2007 (UTC) delete per CSD A7. Even without the problem, he's not notable Deletion of Gavin Keohane WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +3605 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Knowles (footballer) (3rd nomination) User:GiantSnowman 21:51, 19 June 2012 (UTC) delete hasn't played in a pro league and not enough significant coverage, fails and Deletion of James Knowles (footballer) (3rd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3606 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Relationship between Tyranny and Arms Control User:Finngall 20:23, 23 August 2016 (UTC) delete """I could see that this was shaping up to be a massive wall of |original research, but in the interest of |assuming good faith I tried moving it to draft space where the author could work on it at their leisure. But given that the author is persisting in working in mainspace (apparently because ), I have to evaluate the article as it is, and at best it is simply not ready for prime time. And while I tend (sometimes to a fault) to stick with assessing the ''current'' state of an article as opposed to what ''will'' be there or what ''could'' be there, it doesn't look promising for all the reasons given by the """"delete"""" !voters above""" Deletion of The Relationship between Tyranny and Arms Control WP:OR||WP:AGF||WP:ITSIMPORTANT Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3607 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quad 5 Trio User:Aleron235 03:54, 28 November 2005 (UTC) keep A band that has been around for 5 years and continues to thrive is notable in itself. They claim to have 4 releases, and are currently working on a new one. is not policy and should not be treated as such. However, the article does need heavy cleanup to remove what seems to be mostly self-promotion. I'll volunteer to do this Deletion of Quad 5 Trio WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3608 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhagwanji User:Deshnayak 15:37, 13 November 2020 (UTC) keep This article is about a person called Bhagwanji, who is still revered by many. The article doesn't try to prove that he was in fact Subhash Chandra Bose, but discusses from a neutral point of view about claims from certain sections who link him with Subhash Chandra Bose. It highlights the life of Bhagwanji and also delves into the intriguing legal procedure gaining lot of attention in . Merging this with {{slink|Death of Subhas Chandra Bose#Legends of Bose's survival}}, will drop lot of content and make the rest irrelevant. Please read the full article and help me improve it Deletion of Bhagwanji WP:NPOV||WP:RS Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +3609 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prism3D User:MuZemike 04:46, 3 September 2008 (UTC) delete It also does not meet , as the article revolves around that list, in which the non-notability of the article itself comes into play Deletion of Prism3D WP:DIRECTORY Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3610 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ero Manga Sensei - My Little Sister and the Locked Room [[User talk:24.149.119.20|talk]]) 00:08, 27 November 2013 (UTC) merge to Tsukasa Fushimi. Only coverage is based off of an advertisement and/or press-releases, so the subject itself fails and for lacking ''independent'' coverage. Also, the success of a previous light novel series by the same author does not transfer notability on this light novel series. And the presumption that this light novel series ''will'' be successful and ''will'' establish its own notability falls under . Special:Contributions/24.149.119.20|24.149.119.20 Deletion of Ero Manga Sensei - My Little Sister and the Locked Room WP:NOTE||WP:BK||WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3611 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Hammer User:David 18:29, 16 January 2017 (UTC) keep Her https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=vSvRUAkAAAAJ Google scholar shows three well-cited papers but then it drops off steeply. I don't think there's enough depth there for #C1, although it's a case of — she should be there eventually. I can't read the Pensacola or Capital stories, but of the rest, only the Tribune and Kill Switch pieces are actually in-depth, independent, and about her or her work. (The NYT story, for instance, only gives a pull quote by her, not relevant for notability.) But maybe that's enough for Deletion of Jessica Hammer WP:PROF||WP:TOOSOON||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3612 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of stone churches User:Chris 20:23, 29 January 2012 (UTC) delete far too broad in its scope, fails , etc. This belongs as a category instead Deletion of List of stone churches WP:LISTN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3613 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tribal Wars (2nd nomination) User:MuZemike 22:20, 17 September 2008 (UTC) delete and '''|salt again''' — See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=Tribal+Wars&year=&month=-1 deletion log and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=protect&user=&page=Tribal+Wars&year=&month=-1 protection log. The poor quality of this article suggests that this has not improved at all from the other umpteen times this article was recreated or unsalted. This is simply blatant recreation of deleted material and meets G4. Also recommend |salting the earth again; make a user present his/her case to admin for recreating the article again instead of disrupting Wikipedia like this Deletion of Tribal Wars (2nd nomination) WP:SALT||WP:SALT Wikipedia:Protection policy 0 +3614 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Jamiatul Ahlia Darul Ulum Moinul Islam User:Jeff 07:49, 8 August 2010 (UTC) delete """without any |verifiable |reliable sources, we would not keep articles for institutions and individuals """"that follow the familiar Euroamerican tradition"""" either. Per Ragib, the claims of UGC affiliation and of a similar article in the Bengali Wikipedia are outright falsehoods, so how can we possibly trust the person posting them?  """ Deletion of Al-Jamiatul Ahlia Darul Ulum Moinul Islam WP:V||WP:RS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3615 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Black Golden Globe Award winners and nominees User:Feedback 16:42, 25 February 2011 (UTC) comment """If we allow this list to exist, then we should definitely open a """"List of Caucasian Golden Globe winners and nominees"""". There's no difference. By allowing this article to exist and not the latter, you're not being neutral. This list has absolutely no impact or cultural significance. """"'''African Americans in Cinema''' would be a very culturally important article, but that isn't what we're voting for here. We're voting to either keep or delete a very |TRIVIAL list that doesn't need placement in an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia after all, not a Golden Globes trivia handbook""" Deletion of List of Black Golden Globe Award winners and nominees WP:TRIVIA Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +3616 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shrikrishna Upadhyay [[User talk:24.151.10.165|talk]]) 19:03, 14 August 2014 (UTC) comment """I should have caught this earlier, but we really should be searching for him without the honorific, thus, """"Krishna Upadhyay"""". Immediate hits such as http://books.google.com/books?id=6vaHAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA166&dq=%22Krishna+Upadhyay%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=EQbtU-zSPIbfsAT5w4DADw&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=%22Krishna%20Upadhyay%22&f=false, http://www.nepalnews.com/contents/2011/englishweekly/spotlight/aug/aug19/focus.php and http://books.google.com/books?id=5JiOAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Krishna+Upadhyay%22&dq=%22Krishna+Upadhyay%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=EQbtU-zSPIbfsAT5w4DADw&ved=0CDwQ6AEwBg. My opinion is that he now passes as well as . Special:Contributions/24.151.10.165|24.151.10.165""" Deletion of Shrikrishna Upadhyay WP:BASIC||WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3617 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skeptic's Library [[User talk:101.119.14.99|talk]]) 03:08, 19 November 2013 (UTC) delete per . This seems to be a list of works arbitrarily selected by the article author. While the individual works are notable, this specific list is not. References are cited in the article, but they do not relate to this specific collection of works. -- Special:Contributions/101.119.14.99|101.119.14.99 Deletion of Skeptic's Library WP:LISTN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3618 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luther Jackson Middle School User:TerriersFan 05:00, 10 December 2007 (UTC) keep """this is an important school historically. For example """"opened its doors in 1954 as Fairfax County's sole high school for black students"""" from http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-218775.html here. Plenty of sources to meet , see also http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-163432081.html, http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-2786572.html, http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-1409991.html, http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-2786420.html, http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-210820.html, and so on""" Deletion of Luther Jackson Middle School WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3619 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intersex rights in India User:Desmay 20:12, 20 December 2017 (UTC) delete This is a classic case of that would lead to the creation of more redundant articles. There is no need of a separate article just for writing 3 or 6 lines Deletion of Intersex rights in India WP:CFORK Wikipedia:Content forking 33 +3620 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomoko Nishimura User:Calathan 04:37, 27 September 2010 (UTC) comment I'm not sure if she technically meets #3 under uthor, but I would think creating a work that has been adapted into a TV series (and a relatively long one, at 70+ episodes and still airing) would be of equivalent notability to what it listed there. Certainly, creating a work that was adapted into a TV series seems more notable to me than creating a work that got a couple reviews in publications Deletion of Tomoko Nishimura WP:A Wikipedia:Attribution 34 +3621 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Teo User:AustralianRupert 08:07, 16 April 2016 (UTC) delete While I can see a lot of work has been done to fully reference the article for which its editors should be commended, I really don't think the subject is notable enough for a stand alone biography article. Would such an individual be covered in a biographical encyclopedia (for instance, does Singapore have an equivalent of ''Who's Who'', such as the ''New Zealand Dictionary of Biography'' or the ''Australian Dictionary of Biography''? If so, would they qualify for appearance in that? If not, then I suggest perhaps we are reaching in our inclusion.) The subject appears to have received quite a bit of coverage in the context of that one incident, but otherwise they will likely remain a low profile individual. As such, it seems to me like BLP1E applies here, although as Anotherclown suggests perhaps the topic could be covered as a small part in a wider article (if a suitable one is agreed upon, and obviously being careful not to breach ). Beyond this, surely the other consideration is the subject's privacy and not impacting upon their ability to rehabilitate on release. Regards Deletion of Dave Teo WP:UNDUE Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +3622 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Total Dhamaal User:Umair 18:40, 17 September 2017 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Total Dhamaal WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3623 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hunter Ligon User:Trident13 21:50, 1 April 2007 (UTC) delete self written bio, need I say more? Also, sources are poor and resultantly fails . Rgds Deletion of Hunter Ligon WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3624 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mina Pam Dick User:JFHJr NONE delete No substantial coverage that I could find indicating this subject satisfies . I also found no substantial citations or critical review to pass under .— Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Deletion of Mina Pam Dick WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3625 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sona the Voice User:Graeme 12:23, 6 July 2013 (UTC) comment I have declined the speedy delete, so please discuss this properly with a consensus outcome. There is not much promotion and some kind of claim of importance, but I don't think this meets Deletion of Sona the Voice WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3626 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Active NHL players by nationality User:Stifle 19:45, 29 December 2008 (UTC) delete fails items 6 and 8-11 Deletion of Active NHL players by nationality WP:LC Wikipedia:Listcruft 66 +3627 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benik Afobe User:GiantSnowman 17:36, 9 July 2010 (UTC) delete fails and , recreate if/when player becomes notable Deletion of Benik Afobe WP:ATHLETE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3628 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haakon Faste User:Randykitty 15:32, 3 November 2013 (UTC) delete Way |too soon. Doesn't even come close to meeting Deletion of Haakon Faste WP:TOOSOON||WP:ACADEMIC Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +3629 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BaseBean User:Quasar 19:17, 10 June 2017 (UTC) delete appears to be a |protologism with very little usage, as seen from https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=basebean&case_insensitive=on&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url= Google ngrams. Fails the GNG Deletion of BaseBean WP:NEOLOGISM Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +3630 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry (Fawlty Towers) User:Bob 13:58, 18 May 2011 (UTC) delete """with a standard of someone actually coming up with sources instead of just asserting them). I've made an effort to look for sources but I haven't been able to find anything. I'm not hopeful either, since whilst I'm a fairly big fan of Fawlty Towers, I had to look up who he was and I'm fairly sure he only had 20 or 30 lines in the entire run. I'm not expecting more than a footnote in """"Cockneys in 1970s British Television""" Deletion of Terry (Fawlty Towers) WP:HEY Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard 85 +3631 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conley family User:Nagle 04:00, 26 November 2015 (UTC) delete Seems to be a for bios of non-notable people. Is any individual there notable enough for a standalone article? Wikipedia sometimes has family articles, but they're to tie together the articles of individually notable people. Also, 15 SPAs for this article alone indicate a big and problem Deletion of Conley family WP:COATRACK||WP:COI||WP:SPA Wikipedia:Coatrack articles 47 +3632 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live-action wargame [[User talk:64.183.45.226|talk]]) 18:16, 6 April 2017 (UTC) delete or at the very least, '''Redirect''' to LARP. Searches bring up nearly nothing, and the few things that do come up are not from reliable sources. Most of them are nothing but announcements of upcoming events, and many of them seem to be using the term synonymous to regular LARPing. The article was created well over a decade ago, and the fact that no sources have really been created in that time span leads me to believe that this was nothing more than a that never became a thing. Special:Contributions/64.183.45.226|64.183.45.226 Deletion of Live-action wargame WP:NEOLOGISM Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +3633 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Atwater User:DiamondRemley39 01:14, 23 July 2020 (UTC) keep as meets . I've been going through sources and I've added some to the article. More reviews to read, his other name to search for, info on his father/early life/UCLA to seek out, and scifi sources to investigate and add Deletion of Barry Atwater WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3634 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elaine Mardis User:Xxanthippe 02:35, 24 July 2010 (UTC) delete on grounds of copyright infringement despite subject passing rof cites in spades. One of several articles on the The Genome Center written by the communications coordinator. Such practices are apt to end in tears Deletion of Elaine Mardis WP:P Wikipedia:Portal 50 +3635 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kohana (web framework) (3rd nomination) User:Whpq 16:37, 3 August 2011 (UTC) delete Lacks the significant coverage in independent reliable sources to meet |Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines Deletion of Kohana (web framework) (3rd nomination) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3636 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacques Marnier Companie User:Deor 12:31, 25 July 2010 (UTC) delete Fails . MSGJ, the book that you cited in the article (and that 4meter4 linked to above) is a scrape of Wikipedia articles (see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Unreferenced articles#Books LLC), and after typing this comment, I'll be off to remove it. I can find no reliable sources that establish this person's existence Deletion of Jacques Marnier Companie WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3637 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Illinois Arborist Association User:DasallmächtigeJ 18:31, 17 January 2010 (UTC) delete by . I'm averse to even call this an article Deletion of Illinois Arborist Association WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3638 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InterfaithFamily User:Bakazaka 01:23, 6 September 2018 (UTC) delete as unambiguous Deletion of InterfaithFamily WP:PROMO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3639 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milwaukee Ale House User:Nsk92 04:52, 1 October 2008 (UTC) keep """There is detailed coverage of the pub in several books. For example, this bookhttp://books.google.com/books?id=q4SxHmOVX0YC&pg=PA75&dq=%22Milwaukee+Ale+House%22&ei=Af_iSPaUIpTEzATj7-zbBA&sig=ACfU3U0yEhE0zhpXd9gAGQjsVn-s6HWSQw#PPA75,M1 has a separate chapter about this pub, including its history. Similarly, this bookhttp://books.google.com/books?id=ZCt8wxuXmNAC&pg=PA30&dq=%22Milwaukee+Ale+House%22&ei=Af_iSPaUIpTEzATj7-zbBA&sig=ACfU3U2hs0lkgtW_WNLhQr2ySIAhUziBfg#PPA30,M1 has a section about the pub that starts with """"One of Wisconsin's most acclaimed brew pubs, the Milwaukee Ale House is a hangout for those connected to the microbrewing industry..."""" (a direct assertion of notability here). There is also substantial coverage in local newspaper, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: 246 hits in googlenewshttp://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&lr=&tab=pn&q=%22Milwaukee+Ale+House%22&ie=UTF-8, much of it specific and detailed, e.g. http://www.jsonline.com/onwisconsin/music/sep05/352585.asphttp://docs.newsbank.com/g/GooglePM/MWSB/lib00253,0EB82AF9500CAAC1.html, etc. Enough here to pass """ Deletion of Milwaukee Ale House WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3640 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shayna hetzel User:Montco 04:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Shayna hetzel WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3641 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hogg Robinson Group User:Dhartung 17:27, 27 July 2007 (UTC) keep after |excellent rewrite work. Hogg Robinson is indeed a recognizable name Deletion of Hogg Robinson Group WP:HEY Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard 85 +3642 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enzo Martinez User:Sir 23:56, 9 April 2012 (UTC) delete per nom. The coverage of this footballer is , and he is yet to play in a fully pro league. As such, the article fails both relevant notability guidelines, namely and Deletion of Enzo Martinez WP:ROUTINE||WP:GNG||WP:NSPORT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3643 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Library (Seinfeld) User:Toughpigs 04:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC) keep """The sources provided above are fine for establishing GNG. Horacio Vara's assertion that """"reviews don't show notability"""" contradicts existing guidelines (""" Deletion of The Library (Seinfeld) WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3644 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Color or Country (second nomination) User:Mangojuice 14:41, 8 April 2006 (UTC) delete """I actually think the article (well, the top section, anyway) is adequately sourced. The last paragraph is false, by the way: this game was not introduced for the ''first time'' at Mathcamp 2002, I have firsthand knowledge.. and the business about """"Functor or category"""" is a mathcamp in-joke. This game is simply not notable enough... it's basically a case of """ Deletion of Color or Country (second nomination) WP:NFT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +3645 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mannoroth User:Doctorfluffy 05:22, 3 November 2007 (UTC) delete Fails , unlikely reliable secondary sources can be found to establish notability, and violates #PLOT Deletion of Mannoroth WP:FICT||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3646 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debdas Acharya User:1292simon 12:52, 2 May 2013 (UTC) delete Fails . Even trying to decipher the intended topic of the article was a struggle Deletion of Debdas Acharya WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3647 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvey Tolibao User:JayJay 19:03, 1 June 2015 (UTC) keep Meets Deletion of Harvey Tolibao WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3648 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wheelers Primitive Baptist Church User:Headbomb 13:53, 4 June 2020 (UTC) delete simply put, this fails Deletion of Wheelers Primitive Baptist Church WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3649 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nanoprobe (Star Trek) (2nd nomination) User:Pixelface 09:49, 27 October 2008 (UTC) keep """the article doesn't have to be brought """"in line"""" with and since those are not policies. Nanoprobes are a notable :Category:Star Trek devices|''Star Trek'' device. This article survived AFD two months ago, and another nomination for deletion so soon after is uncalled for""" Deletion of Nanoprobe (Star Trek) (2nd nomination) WP:RS||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3650 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristina Behr User:Dhartung 02:59, 30 December 2007 (UTC) delete seems like a just to mention the song. No notability apparent or demonstrated Deletion of Kristina Behr WP:COATRACK Wikipedia:Coatrack articles 47 +3651 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaby Hernandez (2nd nomination) [[User talk:204.126.132.231|talk]]) 15:56, 30 April 2014 (UTC) delete Fails and . Special:Contributions/204.126.132.231|204.126.132.231 Deletion of Gaby Hernandez (2nd nomination) WP:NBASEBALL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3652 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chloe Cammeniti User:Matthewedwards 19:23, 12 July 2009 (UTC) delete A long and detailed |plot S|summary / character biography that only a |dedicated fan would be interested in. It cannot be re-written to meet Wikipedia:SOAPS#Character articles|WikiProject Soap Opera's notability standards for characters or otability as the subject has not received Wikipedia:WAF#Real-world_perspective|real-world coverage in |reliable Wikipedia:V#Sources|independent sources, so cannot satisfy the :CAT:CONTENT|inclusion criteria Deletion of Chloe Cammeniti WP:PLOT||WP:PLOTS||WP:FANCRUFT||WP:N||WP:PSTS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3653 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Predictions for human evolution User:Bearian 20:17, 13 October 2010 (UTC) delete per . It is weird, disjointed, and random Deletion of Predictions for human evolution WP:LIST Wikipedia:Lists 36 +3654 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fly Gibraltar User:Chris 20:28, 12 June 2007 (UTC) delete A putative airline with plans which were put on the back burner; these plans have now been officially cancelled. Fails Deletion of Fly Gibraltar WP:NN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3655 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masago User:ColourBurst 02:42, 3 September 2006 (UTC) delete does not satisfy Deletion of Masago WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3656 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big data (3rd nomination) User:BDD 22:23, 25 July 2012 (UTC) keep It may not be a well defined concept, but that hasn't kept it from being heavily discussed in . From the first page of Google hits alone you have discussions from IBM, McKinsey & Company, and ''Forbes''. I'm not surprised that it was deleted in 2009, but the second nomination was a pretty clear keep over two years ago, and the idea has only become bigger since. It was also a http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2685/4461757843_7869b5d691.jpg cover story in ''Nature (journal)|Nature'', one of over 8000 Google Scholar hits. References already in the article include ''The Economist'' and ''Harvard Business Review''. It's a bit of a buzzword (buzzphrase?) these days, so I'm sympathetic if you want it to go away, but this isn't the way it will happen Deletion of Big data (3rd nomination) WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3657 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tenants (2019 film) User:Bearian 16:57, 3 September 2019 (UTC) delete per and . It may never be released outside of Lagos Deletion of The Tenants (2019 film) WP:HAMMER||WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law 11 +3658 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hard White (Nicki Minaj song) User:IndianBio 13:52, 2 November 2018 (UTC) delete In no way this passes for Deletion of Hard White (Nicki Minaj song) WP:GNG||WP:NSONGS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3659 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Scarlet Letter SparkTune User:Armbrust 19:27, 21 October 2010 (UTC) delete It is a non-notable |song without |reliable sources Deletion of The Scarlet Letter SparkTune WP:NSONGS||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3660 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willis Jackson (character) User:Shooterwalker 21:42, 28 January 2012 (UTC) keep per JClemens. Reasonable belief that this article has if we give people time to look for print sources. Again, we can do another AFD later if we're wrong Deletion of Willis Jackson (character) WP:POTENTIAL Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state 6 +3661 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Jara User:Sir 13:33, 30 September 2017 (UTC) keep Having played in the Peruvian top flight, he meets Deletion of Daniel Jara WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3662 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomer Aviram User:TheGreatWikiLord 03:34, 11 October 2018 (UTC) delete fails per nom. May one day meet guidelines for notability, but not today Deletion of Tomer Aviram WP:DIRECTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3663 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shimmy (song) (2nd nomination) User:Esradekan 12:55, 30 April 2009 (UTC) delete as a non-plausible search term, fails notability per #Songs. No awards, no chart, no covers, no . As pointed out, nothing to warrant a stand alone article that already isn't in Toxicity (album Deletion of Shimmy (song) (2nd nomination) WP:MUSIC||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3664 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Age of Chivalry (Mod) User:Sting_au 06:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC) delete blatant advertising. Fails . The whole article reads like an advertisment Deletion of Age of Chivalry (Mod) WP:NOTE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3665 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spy6teen User:Sharksaredangerous 19:12, 25 April 2011 (UTC) delete """Does not meet the standard of """"significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject""" Deletion of Spy6teen WP:NOTABILITY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3666 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 King's Cup User:GiantSnowman 09:53, 10 June 2013 (UTC) delete per Deletion of 2014 King's Cup WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3667 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan M. Dray User:Deadwikipedian 23:25, 1 April 2018 (UTC) comment """The article seems blatantly advertorial, with peacock words like """"...an ''experienced'' American HCI..."""". If kept, it would need to be rewritten to be encyclopedic and comply with """ Deletion of Susan M. Dray WP:BLPSTYLE Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +3668 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncertainty theory User:Snottywong 00:56, 30 November 2009 (UTC) delete """all or translate them and move them to the Chinese language wiki. The references provided above prove that something called """"Uncertainty Theory"""" (UT) exists, but it is not clear if UT is clearly defined, nor is it clear if this article is about the """"real"""" UT. Since the article claims that UT was invented in 2007, but the references provided date back to the mid-90's, my gut feeling is that this article is not accurately reflecting the sources that were found for it. Just because we can search for """"uncertainty theory"""" and find math articles with """"uncertainty theory"""" in the title doesn't mean that we've found a reference that backs up the material in these articles. I say the articles get deleted, and if someone wants to rewrite the article based on multiple independent |sources, then so be it. At this point, the articles appear to need a nearly complete rewrite, so deletion is probably the best thing we can do for UT""" Deletion of Uncertainty theory WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3669 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel O'Reilly (soccer player) User:GiantSnowman 16:58, 23 June 2012 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Daniel O'Reilly (soccer player) WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3670 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Munay-ki User:Hyperion35 14:55, 22 May 2021 (UTC) delete """I could understand if this was some legitimate work of ethnology, but I don't even know how we document a belief that somehow involves Indus Valley civilization ideals transmitted by Siberians to the Andes, supposedly 30,000 years ago...I mean there are just so many different things wrong with this that it would need several paragraphs to explain. Again, if this was legitimate ethnology, we would have no problem saying """"The Inka believe that the deity they call..."""" etc. This is just . If the guy who invented this stuff is notable, we could merge a small paragraph of this into his article. We do have articles on BS artists where we accurately describe RS explanations for why they are BS artists (like that miracle water guy whose commercials are still running), but that would require good sourcing and it would probably require that this guy has gotten into some sort of trouble. If he's just an obscure loon, then we don't really need anything""" Deletion of Munay-ki WP:MADEUP Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +3671 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nirn User:RMHED 19:00, 27 November 2007 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Nirn WP:FICTION Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3672 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Cook (company) User:Walton_monarchist89 20:22, 6 March 2007 (UTC) merge to Thomas Cook AG. There was really no need to take this to AfD - just be |bold in merging unnecessary articles Deletion of Thomas Cook (company) WP:BOLD Wikipedia:Be bold 78 +3673 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Confucius Peace Prize User:Bxj 21:35, 9 December 2010 (UTC) keep it's not speculative, it's real and it has happened. Just because it's pathetic doesn't mean it's not noteworthy. Appears to have sister articles in several other languages Deletion of Confucius Peace Prize WP:BALL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3674 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabio moro User:MER 07:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC) delete unsourced |autobiography of a |non-notable person Deletion of Fabio moro WP:AUTO||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Autobiography 75 +3675 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halo Engine User:Rankiri 04:25, 27 July 2009 (UTC) delete """The article is filled with |original research. The references only discuss Halo 3 and don't regard the game's engine as a |separately notable subject. Moreover, most of them don't verify the article's text and none of them actually use the phrase """"Halo Engine"""". The official name of the engine is rather unclear since the official developers—as well as most search results—don't capitalize """"engine"""" and don't treat it as a proper namehttp://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/1846/postmortem_wideload_games_stubbs_.php?page=5. From what I see, the engine is only used by the Halo series and Stubbs the Zombie. SharkD's http://www.gameguru.in/first-person-shooters/2009/16/halo-reach-aaa-engine/ """"Halo Reach “AAA Engine”? and http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/3988/choosing_the_game_engine_that_can.php Choosing The Game Engine That Can offer some minor facts but don't provide nontrivial direct coverage of the subject and I couldn't dig up much better sources myself""" Deletion of Halo Engine WP:OR||WP:NRVE Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3676 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keiran Lee User:Lemongirl942 17:34, 26 September 2016 (UTC) delete """There is no way this satisfies GNG. Neither does it satisfy the lower expectations of PORNBIO. As for the rants about """"Deletionism"""", did you ever realise that the runaway """"Inclusionism"""" of yesteryears is responsible for what Wikipedia has become? A place for promotional article about non-notable topics? All of this reduces the long term credibility of the encyclopaedia turning us into just another internet site where anyone can add information and people use it as a medium for promotion. An encyclopaedia is supposed to be accurate and NPOV, which is why we require significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. (See ). That clearly isn't happening here. ''Wikipedia is the sum of all human knowledge, not the sum of all human garbage""" Deletion of Keiran Lee WP:WHYN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3677 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jossed User:James086 02:49, 11 February 2007 (UTC) delete WP:NOT#DICTIONARY|Wikipedia is not a dictionary, I think the nominator is right that there aren't any |''reliable'' sources Deletion of Jossed WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3678 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Freak Next Door User:CaroleHenson 06:43, 6 June 2013 (UTC) delete for failing . I was unable to find material about the films as well - the only source seems to be IMdB Deletion of The Freak Next Door WP:NF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3679 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chatty Café Scheme User:MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:06, 1 September 2021 (UTC) keep the scattered pieces of coverage barely gets it over the line for in my book Deletion of Chatty Café Scheme WP:NORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3680 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Popponesset Peninsula User:SportingFlyer 16:40, 16 May 2021 (UTC) keep The article is now well sourced per and passes as the spit. Recommend keeping and going through with the move, which isn't explicitly against the rules at AfD, could also be merged in the worst case scenario Deletion of Popponesset Peninsula WP:HEY||WP:GEOFEAT Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard 85 +3681 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radha Mangeshkar User:Cutest 14:17, 24 August 2015 (UTC) delete Delete as per nomination also it appears to be the case of Deletion of Radha Mangeshkar WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +3682 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of motorsports people by nickname NONE NONE keep Sports nicknames are notable per as there are substantial compilations of them including Deletion of List of motorsports people by nickname WP:LISTN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3683 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Bell (Australian actor) User:Jenks24 06:27, 5 October 2011 (UTC) delete One minor role in a fairly small TV series means he does not pass and I can't find anything that shows him even coming close to the significant coverage that is required to pass Deletion of James Bell (Australian actor) WP:NACTOR||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3684 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Qiu User:Metal 16:42, 29 November 2013 (UTC) delete can found no evidence that he exists. Without the Chinese name nor can we really know who this article is refering to. article doesn't give anything that's verifiable. Could just as well be a madlib-style test edit. see . no content changes (just style and formatting) since the first edit in 2007. If someone was going to add some kind of details to help us they've had plenty of time already Deletion of Edward Qiu WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3685 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jocelyne Couture-Nowak (second nomination) User:Jpbowen 01:23, 30 April 2007 (UTC) keep per Deletion of Jocelyne Couture-Nowak (second nomination) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3686 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Future User:Ohconfucius 07:28, 17 August 2006 (UTC) delete Wrestled indy starting in 1999 and ending in 1999. Deletion of Nathan Future WP:NN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3687 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirsten Lea User:Eggishorn 20:31, 27 December 2016 (UTC) delete A good place to apply . No credible evidence of notability and hoddibly poor article Deletion of Kirsten Lea WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +3688 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Zein bint Hussein NONE NONE keep This is the English Wikipedia and there's people who flock to keep articles on rticles for deletion/Child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge|royal rticles for deletion/Second child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge|fetuses of the United Kingdom. Having this helps balance things out. This article can be improved with Arabic sources. Here is one I found Deletion of Princess Zein bint Hussein WP:A||WP:A Wikipedia:Attribution 34 +3689 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bundeloafe II: The Return of Jaffar (film) User:Eternal 03:38, 25 August 2020 (UTC) delete Fails both AND Deletion of Bundeloafe II: The Return of Jaffar (film) WP:NFILM||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3690 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Mathieson User:Gnangarra 12:35, 28 June 2010 (UTC) delete """not notable as per the recent Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mimi Macpherson|Mimi MacPherson decision, to quote Jimbo ''Our guideline is clear that """"Being related to a notable person in itself confers no degree of notability upon that person. """" (See #Family""" Deletion of Tim Mathieson WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3691 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frede Blaabjerg User:Xxanthippe 21:41, 2 October 2016 (UTC) keep Would nominator like to comment on relevance of subject's GS citation record to rof criteria Deletion of Frede Blaabjerg WP:P Wikipedia:Portal 50 +3692 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LinkStation User:Moeron 03:08, 27 June 2006 (UTC) delete does not meet |notability criteria of . Looks more like an advert Deletion of LinkStation WP:N||WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3693 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elise window seal User:B 04:38, 10 May 2008 (UTC) delete """Mr. Cut and Ms. Paste have visited a forum (see above), the text (and photo links, all broken) lifted and deposited here. If it weren't for the copyvio, I'd still urge a delete as |Wikipedia is not a """"how-to"""" guide""" Deletion of Elise window seal WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3694 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scotty McCoy User:Jack 21:42, 29 October 2017 (UTC) delete Insufficient coverage to meet or . Does not otherwise meet . |PROMO ahoy Deletion of Scotty McCoy WP:NAUTHOR||WP:BASIC||WP:GNG||WP:PROMO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3695 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Composite Index of National Capability [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart111''']] [[User talk:Stalwart111|(talk)]] . 04:34, 29 August 2012 (UTC) comment of the four provided references, one is anonymous (though the organisation is identifiable by working back through the URL), one is a presentation for which the author can be theorised (again, back through the URL - it's on his section of his faculty's site but the document itself contains no details), one is a fairly well-referenced university thesis for which the author is known and the other is an excel sheet with a list of numbers (clearly not a reliable source). I would venture to suggest that only the university thesis would constitute a ''reliable'' source and one single reliable source surely does not constitute ''significant coverage''. I do, however, think this is a |surmountable problem but the article needs some work. It may be easier to '''Merge''' as others have suggested. Cheers Deletion of Composite Index of National Capability WP:SURMOUNTABLE Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +3696 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thaindian News (2nd nomination) User:Czarkoff 19:59, 18 March 2012 (UTC) delete per {{section link|WP:CSD|A7}}: the article doesn't even claim the notability of this site. Meanwhile (the guideline on web content notability) gives two notability criteria: (1) the content (that is this site, not its wires) has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself and (2) it received a recognized award from independant body. Neither of this condition is demonstrated to be met Deletion of Thaindian News (2nd nomination) WP:NWEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3697 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teenager Liebe User:Tokyogirl79 13:56, 27 January 2012 (UTC) merge The big problem here is that there's a language barrier as well as a time period one. Music reviews from the 80s aren't typically uploaded to the internet and since there's a language barrier, searching for sources isn't proving particularly fruitful for me. I'm seeing tons of fan pages and other non-usable sources, but nothing that would get this song to pass . I do think that a redirect would be worthwhile, though. I'd say that it should go to the EP it was released on, but I don't see any sources on the album and I'm a little afraid of it getting deleted itself. If anyone with better German skills than I possess can find sources, I'm open to changing my vote Deletion of Teenager Liebe WP:NSONG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3698 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avaya Unified Communications Management User:Geek2003 04:02, 17 August 2011 (UTC) keep 15 valid citations with separate authors are cited from within the article establishes and this software has 15 years of history. I found thousands of additional citations within google searches and will add if needed Deletion of Avaya Unified Communications Management WP:NOTABLE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3699 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North America (Americas) User:Haemo 00:21, 3 March 2007 (UTC) delete contains no useful material that could not be merged into North America, and appears to simply advance one POV in an academic argument. Also, the violations are really offensive, and degrade the Encyclopedia. Anyone engaging in such practices should be ashamed Deletion of North America (Americas) WP:CANVASS Wikipedia:Canvassing 30 +3700 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matrix scheme User:Krimpet 06:43, 6 April 2007 (UTC) keep deletion is not the way to resolve an edit war. Plenty of |reliable sources are cited; |notability is firmly established. An edit war, no matter how prolonged, #Discussion|is not a valid reason to delete a perfectly valid article Deletion of Matrix scheme WP:ATT||WP:N||WP:DP Wikipedia:Attribution 34 +3701 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jovan Nikolic User:Ohconfucius 07:34, 30 May 2013 (UTC) delete I found nothing on the dude whatsoever; furthermore, the article fails to assert the notability of this great soldier, so I guess I will conclude that this was a stb at creating a #MEMORIAL|memorial Deletion of Jovan Nikolic WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3702 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afro-denial User:Deville 02:53, 1 May 2006 (UTC) delete per others, this is a dicdef at best, more like at worst Deletion of Afro-denial WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3703 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindela Figlan User:TheSandDoctor 00:32, 11 April 2018 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Lindela Figlan WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3704 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laxpower User:Piotrus 03:44, 20 February 2019 (UTC) delete Fails , Deletion of Laxpower WP:NCORP||WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3705 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tammy Horton User:CosmicNotes 22:41, 8 August 2021 (UTC) delete """Agree with nominator does not meet which requires significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions; or unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. Here """"claim to fame"""" appears to be marrying a hockey player and a few trivial mentions in modeling articles. Does not meet """ Deletion of Tammy Horton WP:NMODEL||WP:NMODEL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3706 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hash BioTech Labs User:AllyD 16:37, 25 October 2018 (UTC) delete I don't see the 2013 ''Indian Express'' article describing their farm as sufficient to demonstrate attained notability, and searches are not finding better Deletion of Hash BioTech Labs :WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3707 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steffen Vroom User:GiantSnowman 14:08, 24 April 2012 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Steffen Vroom WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3708 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uladzimir Levaneuski (2nd nomination) User:Kj 21:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC) delete Definitely insufficient citations to meet , and no evidence passes any of the other criteria either. Might have more of a chance of passing based on the coverage, but again I'm not really convinced Deletion of Uladzimir Levaneuski (2nd nomination) WP:NPROF||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3709 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethnic stereotypes in American media User:Hateless 05:44, 30 June 2006 (UTC) comment Stereotypes are subjective matters, true, and there will always be controversy over what is a stereotype. However, there is no rule that Wikipedia must shy away from controversies and that Wikipedia can only cover objective truths. The rule that applies, however, is that all sides of the controversy be given equal weight (). There has been plenty analyzed and written about stereotypes, the task WP places upon itself is to represent what is out there Deletion of Ethnic stereotypes in American media WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +3710 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donnie Davies (3rd nomination) User:danntm 21:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC) keep a well-known Internet phenom covered with eight citations. To try to distinguish away all the citations will do violence to Deletion of Donnie Davies (3rd nomination) WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3711 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daphne Plessner User:J04n 13:23, 9 March 2011 (UTC) delete unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject of this unsourced |BLP. I did find http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=192547§ioncode=26 this but it falls short of significant coverage by quite a bit Deletion of Daphne Plessner WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +3712 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Brief History of the Empire User:RMHED 17:59, 27 November 2007 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of A Brief History of the Empire WP:FICTION Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3713 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chowtime Na! User:CruzRamiss2002 12:13, 11 August 2021 (UTC) merge to List of programs previously broadcast by Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation. Not notable enough and insuffcient sources to create a separate article, completely fails and Deletion of Chowtime Na! WP:GNG||WP:TVSHOW Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3714 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ole Savior (2nd nomination) User:Soxrock24 20:05, 2 May 2011 (UTC) delete Per , , , and Deletion of Ole Savior (2nd nomination) WP:NOTABILITY||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3715 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Castro (singer) User:Jujutacular 15:41, 28 July 2009 (UTC) keep """from : """"9. Has won or placed in a major music competition"""". I would call American Idol a major music competition, and I would think fourth place warrants inclusion""" Deletion of Jason Castro (singer) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3716 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plotches User:Quarl NONE delete as Wikipedia:Avoid_neologisms|non-notable unverifiable unstable neologism, i.e. protologism (|Wikipedia is not a dictionary). &mdash Deletion of Plotches WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3717 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alhassan Nuhu User:Smartyllama 18:35, 11 December 2018 (UTC) keep Passes per sources Deletion of Alhassan Nuhu WP:NFOOTY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3718 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronilački klub Bosna User:Largoplazo 12:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC) keep The treatment of articles not in English is explained at ages needing translation into English. This nomination is premature by two weeks, after which the article, if not already translated or deleted for some other reason, will almost certainly be ROD|PRODded Deletion of Ronilački klub Bosna WP:P||WP:PROD Wikipedia:Portal 50 +3719 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Lee Adams User:Epinoia 21:49, 21 August 2019 (UTC) delete nothing notable here - popularity does not establish notability - no substantial coverage in the references per , many refs are to his own articles and social media: in order to lack of notability - therefore, delete Deletion of William Lee Adams WP:BASIC||WP:REFBOMBING||WP:MASK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3720 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Radevski (2nd nomination) User:MichaelQSchmidt 00:06, 17 July 2012 (UTC) keep """Possibly a WP:AUTOBIO''"""" does '''not''' mean it is one... and while COI is always a concern, it is not a strong deletion rationale for notable topics (see Jimmy Wales), and even if it ''were'' a COI (not established)... the author has not touched the article for nearly two years. The 2009 nominator returning it again to AFD is fine so that we can revisit the issues of November 2009 and see how this person's career may have progressed in the interim. However, being """"''just a director''"""" can be notable enough if works or director are covered reliable soucres. We do not expect nor demand that a person notable to Australia be notable world-wide, nor do we demand that their career grows, nor that they stay in the news |if they had enough coverage in the past. Conversely, having ''enough'' coverage in reliable sources '''''IS''''' a valid reason to """"weak keep""""... but yes, the article needs work. Okay. Being improvable, even if |not done, does not automaticaly equate to deletion. So... what do we have that could assist in improvements |some time in the future? http://www.smh.com.au/news/tv-reviews/inside-australia-the-prodigal-son/2006/05/02/1146335720355.html ''Sidney Morning Herald'' speaks toward the filmmaker or his works in a more-than-trivial fashion. So does http://www.theage.com.au/news/tv--radio/seeing-both-sides/2006/04/25/1145861347223.html ''The Age'' and http://www.nysun.com/arts/returning-home-somewhat-changed/63996/ ''The New York Sun'' The filmmaker being an editor at ''National Library of Australia#Trove|Trove'' means little, as we do not delete Roger Ebert simply because he authors works in places other than Wikipedia. The University of Notre Dame Australia offers some background.http://www.nd.edu.au/sydney/schools/arts/staff/tradevski.shtml ''Culture Unplugged'' offers more.http://www.cultureunplugged.com/storyteller/Tony_Radevski His films have screened internationally. Anyone check for coverage of them""" Deletion of Tony Radevski (2nd nomination) WP:NTEMP||WP:NEGLECT||WP:DEADLINE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3721 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computrols Incorporated (2nd nomination) User:Kagundu 17:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC) delete this does not pass from searching materials online. The article also had and nothing has happened to gather reliable sources to support it Deletion of Computrols Incorporated (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:CHANCE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3722 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huggle User:TSO1D 22:41, 2 January 2007 (UTC) delete per and Deletion of Huggle WP:NEO||WP:NOR Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +3723 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bud, Not Buddy (film) User:Chris 16:07, 28 December 2011 (UTC) delete I checked over the |criteria for speedy deletion, and I'm not sure which one this would fall under, but it is quite blatant violation of Deletion of Bud, Not Buddy (film) WP:CSD||WP:NFF Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +3724 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florence Nibart-Devouard (second nomination) User:GRBerry 04:25, 18 December 2006 (UTC) comment Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. I suspect notability to standards will become clear before the next year is out, but it will also be easy enough to recreate the article at that time. With neither the ability to read French nor the willingess to pay for archived New York Times articles, I have no opinion on whether has been met yet Deletion of Florence Nibart-Devouard (second nomination) WP:BIO||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3725 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TOMS SHOES (2nd nomination) User:MichaelQSchmidt 18:23, 7 April 2009 (UTC) keep as meeting per provided sources and then send to to remove sense of advert Deletion of TOMS SHOES (2nd nomination) WP:CORP||WP:CLEANUP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3726 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Soares User:Satori 20:57, 30 August 2006 (UTC) merge to WFHN. Does not meet Deletion of Larry Soares WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3727 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Perfit User:CASSIOPEIA 11:17, 13 May 2019 (UTC) keep As a distinguished professor meets |NACADEMIC#5 and Google scholar citations show over 100K work cited thus passes |NACADEMIC#1 Deletion of Michael Perfit WP:NACADEMIC||WP:NACADEMIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3728 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toronto Slutwalk User:Jonathanwallace 11:46, 29 April 2011 (UTC) comment I removed most of the and material. What is left is well sourced and I believe avoids because other such demonstrations are reported planned, so this is more of a protest movement than a random news event which happened one day Deletion of Toronto Slutwalk WP:OR||WP:COATRACK||WP:1E Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3729 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scavengers (video game) User:Charmanderblue 16:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC) delete Neither the game nor its developer pass notability requirements. Barely any coverage on the internet beyond promotional videos/articles. Clear-cut case of Deletion of Scavengers (video game) WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +3730 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adana derby User:Abcmaxx 23:48, 15 March 2016 (UTC) keep It's a big rivalry, a quick google search shows several pictures of fans clashing and mobilising themselves and non-routine articles, therefore satisfying http://www.trthaber.com/haber/spor/adana-demirspor-adanaspor-macinda-sagduyu-cagrisi-210808.html http://www.ultras-tifo.net/photo-news/1423-adanaspor-adana-demirspor-24022013.html http://www.uisf.de/01-03-2014-1900-adana-demirspor-adanaspor-kuluebue-adana-derby/ http://www.casualultra.com/56-adanaspor-adana-demirspor-24-02-2013.html#.VuifWbwXcyg http://www.trthaber.com/haber/spor/adana-demirspor-adanaspor-macinda-sagduyu-cagrisi-210808.html Deletion of Adana derby WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3731 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enrichi Finica User:onel5969 19:46, 11 April 2021 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Enrichi Finica WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3732 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lesson XX User:Knowledgekid87 18:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC) delete Not enough independent sources to establish notability. Also I want to say that while google is nice you have to keep in mind as well Deletion of Lesson XX WP:GHITS Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +3733 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Falcon global group holding User:Howicus 14:24, 19 June 2015 (UTC) delete I found no evidence of coverage in |reliable, independent sources. Does not meet |the notability guideline for corporations or |the general guideline. The state of other articles, though unfortunate, is not relevant here Deletion of Falcon global group holding WP:IRS||WP:CORP||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3734 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert C. Suggs User:Slon02 23:07, 31 October 2010 (UTC) delete I could not find any sources to verify notability, so the article fails Deletion of Robert C. Suggs WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3735 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QED International User:MartinDK 09:26, 2 December 2006 (UTC) comment You may want to read G4, G11 and again Deletion of QED International WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +3736 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad-Hashem Mohaymeni User:Phil 18:26, 22 September 2010 (UTC) keep If the source confirms that the subject is a provincial governor then he clearly passes . Would we even consider deleting an article about the governor of a US state Deletion of Mohammad-Hashem Mohaymeni WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3737 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judaism and bus stops User:Snottywong 16:26, 6 October 2010 (UTC) delete Borderline hoax, textbook violation of . Do Jews go to bus stops? Yes. Is that notable? No. It is as notable as Jews walking on sidewalks, Jews going up and down stairs, and Jews riding the subway Deletion of Judaism and bus stops WP:SYNTH Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3738 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Garrison High School User:Operator873 02:44, 8 December 2017 (UTC) delete Fails ... Secondary schools have precedent to be included so long as their existence can be verified... which can't be accomplished with this one Deletion of Global Garrison High School WP:VERIFY Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3739 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrexham & Shropshire Route User:Tivedshambo 19:51, 23 June 2008 (UTC) delete unsourced speculation/|OR about the route a train company takes. —  Deletion of Wrexham & Shropshire Route WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3740 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abigail Spanberger User:Bearcat 18:17, 21 July 2018 (UTC) merge """This is not showing the depth of coverage it takes to make a candidate notable just for being a candidate — that requires coverage that explodes to Christine O'Donnell proportions, and is not instantly passed by every candidate the moment one extralocal media outlet ''mentions'' her name — every single candidate who runs ''at all'' is ''always'' going to have her name ''mentioned'' in national media at least once or twice. Appearing on TV as an interview guest is not support for notability either, as that makes her the ''speaker'' and not the ''subject''. Wikipedia's notability test is not """"has she been in the news lately"""", it is """"has she been in the news for reasons that would pass the |ten-year test for enduring significance"""" — the notability test is showing evidence that people will ''still'' be looking for this article in ''2028'' because she accomplished something, like ''winning'' the election and thereby ''holding'' office, that makes her ''permanently'' notable. Having an article about every single person whose name happens to get into the news cycle is ''not'' what we're here for, and the volume of coverage actually being shown here is ''not'' enough to make her a special case over and above most other candidates in most other districts who are also getting their names into the news cycle right now""" Deletion of Abigail Spanberger WP:10YT Wikipedia:Recentism 38 +3741 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suvra Mukherjee User:Chris 10:21, 19 October 2015 (UTC) delete Questionable notability. Without more sources I don't think this passes Deletion of Suvra Mukherjee WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3742 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beau Gunderson user:bluedustmite 15:45, 13 November 2007 (UTC) delete per . A very minor candidate who received http://www.vote.wa.gov/Elections/Results/Results.aspx?e=a3501711-c318-45f4-8a03-1d926ac839b7&j=b1977cb9-5217-42c7-97d8-ca0290e4dfb3&o=9bbf583e-8934-4ec4-86ae-61268ea07070 less than four percent of the vote in a district election. No achievements, political or otherwise, and the only sources are his own website and local news coverage. &mdash Deletion of Beau Gunderson WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3743 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Line-Up Changes on AT&T U-verse from the 2010s User:Wikipedical 06:10, 30 September 2018 (UTC) delete per nom, data table completely violates Deletion of List of Line-Up Changes on AT&T U-verse from the 2010s WP:NOTDIR Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3744 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudolph van Richten (2nd nomination) User:Rorshacma 16:40, 11 December 2019 (UTC) delete As the article has undergone no major revisions, and there ''still'' are no reliable secondary sources discussing the character in any meaningful way to allow it to pass the , there is no reason for the previous AFD's consensus to have been ignored and reverted. Deletion and restoration of the redirect is the best solution to keep this from happening again Deletion of Rudolph van Richten (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3745 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lungs (song) User:Richwales 05:20, 28 July 2011 (UTC) delete per and Deletion of Lungs (song) WP:RS||WP:NSONGS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3746 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cb the great User:Dennisthe2 06:38, 3 February 2007 (UTC) delete Not only is this a hoax, this sounds distinctively of |something made up in school one day Deletion of Cb the great WP:NFT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +3747 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apto User:K 18:26, 4 November 2018 (UTC) delete does not meet ; significant RS coverage not found. Promotionalism only Deletion of Apto WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3748 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Kevan User:Ultra 06:19, 2 October 2006 (UTC) delete as vanity, failure, and per the above arguments Deletion of Tim Kevan WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3749 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Wetzel NONE 21:10, 21 November 2006 (UTC) delete Clearly fails under --Orange Mike Deletion of Joshua Wetzel WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3750 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stagecoach Gold bus route S2 (2nd nomination) User:Pontificalibus 15:04, 5 February 2020 (UTC) merge to Stagecoach in Oxfordshire. There is not the significant coverage in reliable sources that would allow us to write a proper article per . It seems the Stagecoach Gold article would only ever list this route, whereas Stagecoach in Oxfordshire seems more amenable to the inclusion of additional information related to Oxford Deletion of Stagecoach Gold bus route S2 (2nd nomination) WP:WHYN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3751 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samy Sana User:Papaursa 12:13, 19 August 2020 (UTC) keep He's won multiple world championships that are listed at and is currently ranked in the world top 10 (another criteria for showing notability). Much of the coverage can be considered routine sports reporting, but his accomplishments clearly qualify him as WP notable Deletion of Samy Sana WP:NKICK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3752 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamil Isai Sangam User:Hongkongresident 13:22, 30 October 2010 (UTC) keep Keep'''. A http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Tamil+Isai+Sangam%22&hl=en&safe=off&rlz=1T4TSNA_enUS385US385&tbs=nws:1,ar:1&ei=tRrMTIH5F4P6lwfI4OzqCA&start=0&sa=N quick News search indicates it does meet criteria, but the article needs to be cleaned up. There's been non-trivial profiles of the organisation on various well-known Indian newspapers, like ''The Hindu'' and ''Indian Express''. And this is without the |non-English results, which there could be a lot of Deletion of Tamil Isai Sangam WP:BAND||WP:NOENG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3753 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JahSun User:Begoon 00:37, 6 February 2012 (UTC) delete Unless reliable sources establishing |notability are provided Deletion of JahSun WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3754 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Backstreet Boys' eighth studio album User:Lawrencekhoo 04:17, 31 December 2012 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Backstreet Boys' eighth studio album WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3755 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jared Staal User:Nurmsook 17:09, 11 January 2011 (UTC) keep """WP:SNOW and per Ravendrop. Let's be honest, the Staal family and its individual members have probably established more notability in recent years than any other family in this country, including the Harpers or any other recent PM. Seriously, their ''parents'' could pass based on the coverage they have received. So to say that one of their sons doesn't is ludicrous. Step 9 in mentions that """"before nominating due to sourcing or notability concerns, make a good-faith attempt to confirm that such sources don't exist"""". I'm not sure these attempts were made for this article. If they were, this article would not be at AfD. At any rate, this article is an easy pass at GNG""" Deletion of Jared Staal WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3756 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diane Fleming User:Tgeairn 19:14, 3 February 2012 (UTC) delete WP:PERP makes this one clear. The victim was not and the motivation is not spelled out in the article at all (and therefore not a |well-documented historic event Deletion of Diane Fleming WP:WELLKNOWN||WP:EVENT Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +3757 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura-Ioana Andrei User:Tvx1 21:21, 31 July 2017 (UTC) delete The tennis project is extremely inclusive, so if a subject does not meet that ||project's notability guideline nor Wikipedia's GNG, it's crystal that we should not have an article on that subject. Also, doesn't this fall under Deletion of Laura-Ioana Andrei WP:NTENNIS||WP:G4 Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3758 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Don User:Chzz 00:50, 14 February 2011 (UTC) delete no sign of notability per , lacks significant coverage in reliable sources ; per not notable Deletion of Eric Don WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:VRS||WP:BLP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3759 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raging Fetus User:AmitDeshwar 01:21, 21 September 2006 (UTC) delete Having a my space account does not meet (of course if some how information is dug up showing that they meet , then I'm all for keeping Deletion of Raging Fetus WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3760 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dejan Bandović (2nd nomination) User:Pharaoh 02:35, 10 August 2017 (UTC) keep passes Deletion of Dejan Bandović (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3761 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesús Joaquín Fernández Sáenz de la Torre User:GiantSnowman 00:27, 19 September 2010 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Jesús Joaquín Fernández Sáenz de la Torre WP:ATHLETE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3762 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gianluigi Donnarumma User:Sir 17:22, 31 August 2015 (UTC) delete He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails and Deletion of Gianluigi Donnarumma WP:NSPORT||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3763 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayfield Homes User:HighKing 11:32, 13 August 2018 (UTC) delete I agree with the above analysis, references fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and Deletion of Hayfield Homes WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3764 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Empowerment and Rights Institute User:Margin1522 11:32, 28 January 2015 (UTC) keep The organization's http://www.erichina.org/english/eariinthenews.htm own website has dozens of other references. They don't all mention it directly, but normally the 4 cites in the article should be enough. One thing is that all of those references are from 2005 or 2006, as were mentions in books. It might not exist anymore. But under , if it was notable in 2005 I think it's still keep. –  Deletion of Empowerment and Rights Institute WP:NTEMP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3765 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roland Sparkes User:LibStar 12:26, 5 January 2010 (UTC) comment a number of guidelines are relevant here regarding Roland Sparkes self editting. , , , and clearly . the use of twitter as a reference is clearly a breach of Deletion of Roland Sparkes WP:COI||WP:POV||WP:OWN||WP:NOTRESUME||WP:AUTOBIO||WP:RS Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +3766 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David K. Bernard User:E 14:32, 30 April 2018 (UTC) keep head of denomination as per and sourcing during AFD Deletion of David K. Bernard WP:CLERGYOUTCOMES||WP:HEYMANN Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +3767 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional brands in South Park (2nd nomination) User:Paul730 02:45, 30 November 2007 (UTC) delete per EALacey, sgeureka, Erik, and Bignole. Fictional brands have no relevance on Wikipedia under they are independantly notable. |Notability is not inherited - being a part of a larger notable topic does not make something notable. By that logic, we would have a separate articles for every member of a famous person's family, because that person is notable and their family are associated with them. Everything must establish notability of it's own accord... think about it; planet Earth is notable, does that mean we need a separate article for everyone who lives on Earth? I mean, they live on a notable planet, so why not? (Please note sarcasm) Listing every fictional brand on a popular TV show is |indiscriminate information. If something is notable for being on ''South Park'', what's to stop me from making a List of characters in South Park with brown hair? Notability guidelines exist for a reason. This article fails to establish why it deserves a place on Wikipedia. It's fancruft - perfect for South Park wiki but certainly not here Deletion of List of fictional brands in South Park (2nd nomination) WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:IINFO Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +3768 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seventh Studio Project (Britney Spears Album) User:Narutolovehinata5 10:48, 19 April 2010 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Seventh Studio Project (Britney Spears Album) WP:HAMMER Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law 11 +3769 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giapo User:Acroterion 17:59, 9 December 2009 (UTC) delete I see no coverage outside of Auckland, and precious little there, at least as references. For this company to meet it should at least have broad notability in New Zealand at large, with coverage in other media in other NZ cities. Coverage in social media is interesting, but so far I see nothing beyond up-to-date marketing practice, of which an article on Wikipedia would be a part Deletion of Giapo WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3770 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niger seed oil User:Djembayz 00:14, 22 August 2015 (UTC) keep Has three academic articles, so passes as notable article. Would be useful to merge and redirect, however, and have all the information on the seeds in one place Deletion of Niger seed oil WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3771 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Benedict User:StAnselm 11:49, 9 March 2015 (UTC) keep the current state of the article is of little relevance in determining this; the relevant guideline is . I don't quite know what ''profeseur honoraire'' means in terms of criterion 5, but the Google Scholar results, headlined by works of 187 and 120 citations respectively, suggests that the subject passes criterion 1 Deletion of Philip Benedict WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3772 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J.C. Gregson User:onel5969 19:46, 12 April 2016 (UTC) delete not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to show they pass Deletion of J.C. Gregson WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3773 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comlink User:TheSandDoctor 05:36, 23 March 2018 (UTC) merge to Wiktionary (specifically, wikt:comlink or wikt:commlink) per . The title ''is'' searched for, has a relevant entry in Wiktionary, does not have a viable target for redirection here, and the title doesn't have much scope (largely science fiction oriented, so I do not think redirecting to transceiver would be appropriate). Therefore, I come to the conclusion that a soft redirect may be appropriate (per the steps outlined in Template:Wiktionary redirect Deletion of Comlink WP:POINTWIKT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +3774 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chantal Wiertz User:Bri 10:28, 10 February 2021 (UTC) delete as , no inherent notability attached to beauty contests Deletion of Chantal Wiertz WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +3775 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oldest Language User:Isotope23 20:07, 21 February 2006 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Oldest Language WP:NOR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3776 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Banks (journalist) User:Wikicology 18:09, 15 July 2015 (UTC) delete Sadly no evidence of |notability Deletion of Michael Banks (journalist) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3777 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Lynx bus routes (Orlando) User:Ajf773 09:18, 27 April 2021 (UTC) delete per , nothing notable about any of these routes Deletion of List of Lynx bus routes (Orlando) WP:NOTTRAVEL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3778 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back To Square One (Band) User:Kudpung 20:52, 31 August 2017 (UTC) delete clear case of failing to meet . Wikipedia is not for promoting new music groups or their recordings Deletion of Back To Square One (Band) WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3779 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Schirmer User:Mdtemp 16:20, 24 June 2013 (UTC) delete Doesn't quite meet or Deletion of Bob Schirmer WP:MANOTE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3780 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ten (manga) User:AnmaFinotera 06:03, 7 June 2010 (UTC) delete Fails and - a minor mention in ANN alone is not significant coverage, and non-reliable sources of course cannot establish notability at all. Without actual demonstrable, |verifiable coverage, claims of probably coverage also cannot make it notable as they are not actually shown to exist. As it is now, it is an unnotable book and deletion is appropriate. Recreation as a redirect to Nobuyuki Fukumoto would be appropriate if there are links to it Deletion of Ten (manga) WP:BK||WP:N||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3781 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lions' Gate stabbings User:Debresser 22:12, 15 December 2018 (UTC) keep passes , . Plus Deletion of Lions' Gate stabbings WP:NCRIME||WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3782 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommy T. Rapisardi [[User talk:Yanksox|Yanksox]] 02:29, 27 October 2006 (UTC) delete Does assert some important stuff, but simply doesn't appear to meet Deletion of Tommy T. Rapisardi WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3783 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Bergstein User:Gaijin42 15:00, 25 October 2013 (UTC) keep Per busterD way below with 3 RS. he meets GNG, but barely. Will have to keep vigilant to avoid the gossip rags from being used and bring in violations Deletion of David Bergstein WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +3784 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Racial disappearance User:Baileypalblue 23:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC) delete The nominator's rationale sums the situation pretty well. It may be possible to write an encyclopedic article on the subject of the dimunition and disappearance of races due to immigration and miscegenation, but this article is a |FRINGE #ESSAY|ESSAY. Ordinarily I would argue for keeping the article and re-writing it, but when you remove the non-encylopedic content from this article (as I have done), you are left with nothing but a |NEOLOGISM. To make a truly clean start you'd have to rename the article, come up with a different definition of its topic, and re-write and source it from the ground up. There's no foundation to build on; better to delete the article and start from scratch Deletion of Racial disappearance WP:FRINGE||WP:NOT||WP:NEOLOGISM Wikipedia:Fringe theories 44 +3785 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foerster + Rutow User:Stuartyeates 10:17, 7 September 2011 (UTC) delete a) I smell a rat in that all their stuff appears to be in German, yet there is no transwiki link; (b) there's lots of stuff they've done, but it's not clear how much of it is about them as required by Deletion of Foerster + Rutow WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3786 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzan Bushnaq User:RayAYang 15:39, 11 November 2010 (UTC) comment More important than diversity on Wikipedia is our ability, as a community, to |verify the significance and facts claimed in the article. If we can't get a sufficient number of Arabic-speaking editors to verify this article and the subject's notability, it should be deleted Deletion of Suzan Bushnaq WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3787 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganool User:Jmertel23 13:46, 7 March 2019 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Ganool WP:WEBCRIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3788 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isra Hirsi User:SoWhy 12:07, 22 January 2020 (UTC) keep WP:NOTINHERITED is in itself not a valid reason for deletion. Failing would be but in this case, the subject seems to have attracted sufficient coverage to pass or at least . Does she receive a lot of coverage mainly because of who her mother is? Most likely. But it's not our job to chastise reliable sources for ''why'' they cover a subject as long as they do cover it substantially. In addition to the coverage already mentioned, there is also https://www.theroot.com/how-ilhan-omars-daughter-isra-hirsi-is-connecting-the-f-1838282035 The Root, https://www.jacobinmag.com/2019/05/youth-climate-strike-isra-hirsi Jacobin, https://www.thewrap.com/16-year-old-climate-and-racial-justice-advocate-isra-hirsi-to-be-honored-as-voice-of-the-future/ The Wrap, https://www.thecut.com/2019/03/ilhan-omars-daughter-is-leading-the-youth-climate-strike.html New York's The Cut and even https://weather.com/en-CA/international/videos/video/meet-isra-hirsi-americas-youth-climate-activist The Weather Channel for example. That appears to be sufficient to meet the bar of both GNG and BASIC. Regards Deletion of Isra Hirsi WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3789 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horerczy User:Ad 18:22, 17 August 2014 (UTC) delete Cited sources appear unreliable and the article fails . Additionally I have doubts that this article passes as there seems very limited prospects for expansion into a stand alone encyclopedic article. Am open to reconsideration if sufficient RS sources are found. Absent at least some kind of RS sourcing there is nothing to merge Deletion of Horerczy WP:V||WP:STUB Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3790 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergio Savarese User:Cavarrone 17:28, 18 January 2013 (UTC) keep per above. Passes Deletion of Sergio Savarese WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3791 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donuts N' Glory User:Jasynnash2 09:34, 24 September 2008 (UTC) delete they may meet one of the many criteria at but, unless it's made clear which one in the article (and referenced) I have to stick with delete for lack of notability and verifiability Deletion of Donuts N' Glory WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3792 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10th Anniversary User:Armbrust 13:14, 16 September 2010 (UTC) delete """as article fails |notability criteria for books. The """"Women's Murder Club series"""" should be created first, it it meets notability criteria""" Deletion of 10th Anniversary WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3793 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pelinpala User:Zeibura 19:09, 22 June 2007 (UTC) delete borderlining on A7. No assertions of why he meets ; if the record labels on which his albums are released are notable, then he does meet the guidelines, but said labels aren't named. Furthermore this is full of unverifiable information Deletion of Pelinpala WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3794 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neldë User:Disavian 08:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC) delete I'm having trouble finding any sources for any of this, so IMO it pretty clearly fails and Deletion of Neldë WP:N||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3795 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice Sakitnak Akammak User:Beccaynr 04:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC) keep per 4(d Deletion of Alice Sakitnak Akammak WP:ARTIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3796 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GUI Tar User:Joe 02:24, 25 December 2009 (UTC) delete I can't find |significant coverage for this software Deletion of GUI Tar WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3797 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spuddles User:Quarl NONE delete as |Complete bollocks. &mdash Deletion of Spuddles WP:BALLS Wikipedia:Complete bollocks 62 +3798 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Phoenix User:Mattythewhite 17:04, 3 September 2010 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Jamie Phoenix WP:ATHLETE||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3799 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pivot Legal Society User:Rhododendrites 01:09, 10 November 2015 (UTC) comment While complaining about Neelix creating a bunch of clean-up work for others in the community, your rapid fire deletion nominations (dozens made within a few minutes of each other that clearly did not follow ) likewise puts a burden on others (it takes time to look for sources). &mdash Deletion of Pivot Legal Society WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +3800 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Smith (ice hockey) [[User talk:Ravenswing|''' '' Ravenswing '' ''']] 09:01, 3 January 2016 (UTC) delete Whether the EIHL is a fully professional league (something currently under debate at the WikiProject) is irrelevant. At the most generous, he's played a relatively small number of games without achieving particular distinction, and would fail the most generous conceivable criterion of . No evidence the player meets the GNG beyond routine match coverage explicitly debarred by Deletion of Sam Smith (ice hockey) WP:NHOCKEY||WP:ROUTINE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3801 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PEN15 User:Useight 04:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC) delete non-notable prank. Wikipedia is |not for things made up on day Deletion of PEN15 WP:NFT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +3802 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hi5teria User:HyperGaruda 04:54, 30 November 2016 (UTC) keep It looks like someone improved the previously sketchy sourcing. While I still have my doubts about the blog post in ''Viva'', the coverage in ''Republika'' and ''Tempo'' seems to satisfy Deletion of Hi5teria WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3803 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baylee Thomas Wylee Littrell User:Oncamera 07:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC) delete as well. Fails . '''Special:Contributions/Oncamera|on Deletion of Baylee Thomas Wylee Littrell WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3804 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elijah Daniel (2nd nomination) user:fourthords 14:59, 18 July 2017 (UTC) keep """because """"Declined prod"""" is not a #REASON|reason for deletion, and looking at the article currently at Elijah Daniel, I don't see any myself""" Deletion of Elijah Daniel (2nd nomination) WP:DEL Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +3805 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austin Thomas User:Jerry_teps 08:35, 21 August 2008 (UTC) comment Nom is a . That's why I didn't take an indepth look at the article. I'm sorry and I wont make the mistake again. &ndash Deletion of Austin Thomas WP:SPA Wikipedia:Single-purpose account 21 +3806 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Hoffman (businessman) User:Bearian 17:56, 31 October 2007 (UTC) delete per Burtntsauce. Sorry, DGG, but there's a blatant BLP violation here, with lots of claims and |zero sources for any of them. Not my field, so I can't rescue this one Deletion of Steve Hoffman (businessman) WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3807 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devaraya (Telugu Film) User:MichaelQSchmidt 06:54, 14 September 2012 (UTC) delete this one-sentence stub. As with most Indian films, the audio music tracks are almost always released weeks or months before the film itself... and I did find THESE http://entertainment.oneindia.in/telugu/news/2012/pawan-kalyan-release-srikanth-devaraya-audio-099397.htmlhttp://entertainment.oneindia.in/telugu/news/2012/pawan-kalyan-release-srikanth-devaraya-audio-099397.htmlhttp://ibnlive.in.com/news/devarayas-music-to-be-released-by-pawan-kalyan/288617-71-216.htmlhttp://www.apgap.com/devaraya-audio-launch-promo/ which state that the audio will come out on September 28 2012, but that the project is currently filming. Fails . As this article is |premature, we can bring back a far more comprehensive article when the film is released and actually gets some film coverage Deletion of Devaraya (Telugu Film) WP:NFF||WP:NYF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3808 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaac Nessim User:Shizane 12:11, 12 July 2006 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Isaac Nessim WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3809 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Gore III (4th nomination) User:Bluedustmite 15:03, 22 September 2006 (UTC) delete per . I would also support a '''redirect''' to Al Gore, since everything noteable about Gore III is already mentioned in that article Deletion of Al Gore III (4th nomination) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3810 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shag Harbour UFO incident User:Erebus 16:15, 6 March 2014 (UTC) keep Although the article's sourcing may need a little work in it's current state, more sources can be found. The article has been covered in The Chronicle Herald in http://www3.ns.sympatico.ca/dledger/the%20herald%20headline682.gif 1967 and more recently http://thechronicleherald.ca/novascotia/1146689-witness-shares-memories-as-shag-harbour-ufo-festival-set-to-begin in 2013 A quick google search comes up with other sources: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/n-s-town-marks-45-years-since-possible-ufo-sighting-1.1168468 1, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alexandra-holzer/ufo-dances-with-airplane-_b_1213784.html 2 http://metronews.ca/news/166662/diver-finds-depressions-on-seabed-at-alleged-nova-scotia-ufo-site/ 3. The Canadian government/millitary has some reports available in their archives, there is an annual http://www.thecoastguard.ca/Living/2013-08-06/article-3340089/UFO-incident-festival-set-for-Shag-Harbour/1 festival celebrating the incident and it has been the subject of a documentary and multiple books. Admittedly, all together it isn't ''that'' much, but considering it happened in 1967 I feel it's enough coverage to make it pass Deletion of Shag Harbour UFO incident WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3811 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cellophane (band) User:FingersOnRoids 22:05, 23 April 2009 (UTC) keep The new sources warrant the article inclusion under Deletion of Cellophane (band) WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3812 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DW Three Kingdoms User:Orangemike 17:15, 30 January 2008 (UTC) comment my call for deletion applies to both the book and the publisher. |Notability is not contagious; a retelling of a notable story is not therefore in any way itself notable, and this is a classic example of non-notable: a company set up by an obscure author, to publish his own fanfiction (with cover illustration by himself). It fails in the strongest terms, and should have been speedied long since Deletion of DW Three Kingdoms :WP:NOTCONTAGIOUS Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +3813 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Kleine User:Kugao 19:54, 15 January 2011 (UTC) keep I also agree that Major League Scouts should be considered notable, and the references in the article appear to demonstrate that he passes Deletion of Matt Kleine WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3814 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Springfield, Missouri User:TimothyBlue 17:30, 5 December 2020 (UTC) delete Fails does not have in discussing this as a group. The city is not notable for tall buildings and the buildings are not notably tall. The list does not meet , there is nothing there that can assist in navigation.   //  Deletion of List of tallest buildings in Springfield, Missouri WP:LISTN||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:CLN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3815 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interactive Storytelling Game User:Markkbilbo 19:26, 18 January 2006 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Interactive Storytelling Game WP:NOR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3816 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guillaume Bianchi User:Smartyllama 12:40, 31 July 2019 (UTC) keep Whether he meets is irrelevant because the sources are enough to meet Deletion of Guillaume Bianchi WP:NSPORT||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3817 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 UCLA throat slashing User:Edison 02:53, 12 March 2011 (UTC) delete Nothing which could be merged to the article about the university, even a single sentence, without giving the incident |undue weight. There was local press coverage and an AP story. Total Google News archive coverage only was during October 8-12 2009. Classic instance where and justify deletion of the stabbing incident. Otherwise every bar fight with a broken beer bottle and every knife attack in the history of every school in the world should be added to the articles about the schools. Wikipedia is not a chronicle of every case of attempted murder Deletion of 2009 UCLA throat slashing WP:UNDUE||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +3818 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital community art User:Stuartyeates 05:36, 16 November 2011 (UTC) delete as a with no significant coverage Deletion of Digital community art WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +3819 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Béla Sipos User:David 06:19, 8 May 2021 (UTC) delete Badly sourced, with no evidence of or based notability. In particular, his economic works appear to have single-digit citations in Google Scholar, far below the standard for macroeconomics in general and for work on economic cycles more specifically. The language barrier cannot be blamed as many of these works are in English Deletion of Béla Sipos WP:GNG||WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3820 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bader Al-Deayea User:GiantSnowman 15:49, 2 April 2011 (UTC) delete no evidence that he has played in a fully-pro league, failing Deletion of Bader Al-Deayea WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3821 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Tsarion (2nd nomination) User:Qworty 04:46, 20 May 2008 (UTC) delete """Self-published """"author"""" without much going for him. Most of the sources are blogs and such, and the few legitimate sources, unfortunately, are not ''about'' him. So WP notability standards are not being met here""" Deletion of Michael Tsarion (2nd nomination) WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3822 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Next Internet Millionaire (2nd nomination) User:Widefox 23:48, 12 September 2015 (UTC) delete Yes it's borderline N. Patience has run out for this self-promotion. It also isn't a) a film b) television or c) been broadcast. I've removed those three claims. Yes, I agree 100% with DGG. This is part of deciding where our boundaries are. It's basically to see if this was something important in the evolution of video. Looking at the timescale, maybe it wasn't. Else it's NOTNEWS. Reading the sources - Wired wasn't sure to take this seriously. What standard do we want to be? Less than NEWS? Promotion is dilution of our only worth Deletion of The Next Internet Millionaire (2nd nomination) WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +3823 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jai McDowall User:Spyka 16:23, 5 June 2011 (UTC) merge For now per . If he becomes hugely famous and releases music down the line and gains notability away from the show then sure. Right now however, remembering , he's known for only being on BGT. Aside: Anyone else suspicious of these multiple 92.22.x IPs who've only ever edited Jai's page Deletion of Jai McDowall WP:1E||WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3824 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nickels User:Kinu 06:33, 22 February 2006 (UTC) delete as |made up in school one day goodness Deletion of Nickels WP:NFT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +3825 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The White Rose Society (website) user:Krich 02:29, 11 January 2006 (UTC) delete Does not meet the requirements of . Whether people love or hate the content on the site is irrelevant Deletion of The White Rose Society (website) WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3826 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gods of Demential User:RGTraynor 15:57, 13 June 2007 (UTC) delete fails , , . Only 22 hits on the Italian Wikipedia, and many of them are Wiki mirrors http://www.google.it/search?q=+%22Gods+of+Demential%22+-Myspace+-Wikipedia&hl=it&lr=&as_qdr=all&start=30&sa=N. This seems well under the radar even in Bologna Deletion of Gods of Demential WP:V||WP:MUSIC||WP:NN Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3827 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tradepedia User:David 13:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC) delete no references, a basic shows mostly press releases Deletion of Tradepedia WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +3828 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donatus Kaufmann [[User talk:2A02:C7F:4481:8300:90DC:E235:5074:54B0|talk]]) 20:22, 18 September 2019 (UTC) delete The sources do not have the necessary depth to meet . As an example, take the Wall Street Journal reference that has been highlighted. This is simply a directory entry. It is one of no less than 40 such entries on Thyssenkrupp executives. As an obiter dictum, all the 'keep' views have been made by accounts/IPs with little or no other contributions. Special:Contributions/2A02:C7F:4481:8300:90DC:E235:5074:54B0|2A02:C7F:4481:8300:90DC:E235:5074:54B0 Deletion of Donatus Kaufmann WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3829 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Kaplowitz User:Sugarpine 23:01, 20 September 2006 (UTC) delete WP:BIO and maybe a sentence of Deletion of Josh Kaplowitz WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +3830 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zorin OS (2nd nomination) User:Aoidh 23:05, 7 September 2013 (UTC) delete Fails . The only third-party sources are reviews from Katherine Noyes, who routinely reviews Linux distros; that doesn't seem to show notability and even if it did, that's the only third-party author who seems to have given Zorin OS any attention at all, which is not enough to establish notability on Wikipedia. DistroWatch does not contribute towards establishing notability as http://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=submit you can simply buy an entry in DistroWatch. The subject also comes nowhere close to meeting in any way Deletion of Zorin OS (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:NSOFT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3831 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Girl User:Alphachimp 03:00, 20 July 2006 (UTC) delete Not notable, per nom. Also |Wikipedia is not a crystal ball Deletion of This Girl WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3832 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perry D Cox User:Arxiloxos 01:04, 26 August 2010 (UTC) comment """There is a lot of cruft that needs to be cleaned from this article, but it does make some significant assertions of notability--for example the coverage of his work in ''Us Weekly|Us'' and ''Forbes''. There is a significant coterie of influential, notable Beatles experts who are primarily self-published (''see, for example'', Allan Kozin, http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0DE5DC1E31F935A15751C1A9609C8B63 """"A Book Publisher, Beatlemaniacs? Why Don't You Do It on Your Own?"""", ''New York Times'', December 26, 2006). However, Cox isn't mentioned in that ''NYT'' article and I am not sure that the 2 older articles mentioned above are enough to get him over the hump, -wise. Some additional reviews or coverage of him or his work in mainstream media might do it, though, if such could be found""" Deletion of Perry D Cox WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3833 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sentic computing User:Jmajeremy 02:52, 7 March 2012 (UTC) delete Erik Cambria seems a little too popular in the reflist. If it contains new and information, then it could be added to the existing paragraph at Sentiment analysis#Methods Deletion of Sentic computing WP:VERIFIABLE Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3834 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Needar the Fearless User:Priyanjali 10:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC) delete lack of reliable resources. Fails Deletion of Needar the Fearless WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3835 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arctic Adventures User:Ajf773 17:21, 16 December 2018 (UTC) delete Highly promotional article. The sourced content is mostly directory of reviews (which only include subtle mentions of the company) that don't offer much to supporting Deletion of Arctic Adventures WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3836 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biffole User:Meshach 05:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC) delete per . Not encyclopedic Deletion of Biffole WP:NFT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +3837 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unarmed African Americans killed by law enforcement officers in the United States User:BabbaQ 16:51, 19 July 2021 (UTC) keep meets and verifiable info Deletion of List of unarmed African Americans killed by law enforcement officers in the United States WP:NLIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3838 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Hartigan User:Schuym1 00:03, 15 September 2008 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Miss Hartigan WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3839 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incarceration Rate, Military Spending, and Surveillance among the World Superpowers User:ZimZalaBim 18:43, 7 December 2008 (UTC) delete as |original research. AfD could possibly be simply combined with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surveillance and Incarceration in the U.S., Russia, and China Deletion of Incarceration Rate, Military Spending, and Surveillance among the World Superpowers WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3840 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Youness Lacchab User:Grailcombs 19:57, 18 March 2021 (UTC) delete Present sources doen't passes and his career has yet to show to meet Deletion of Youness Lacchab WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3841 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophie Gradon User:Thsmi002 13:45, 24 June 2018 (UTC) keep per and ey. I added sources on her career as a marketing manager. She won a wikinotable pageant and had an influential career among the charities in Newcastle. Being a contestant a notable series further adds to notability. Her death was widely reported by notable news sources. All in all, I think notability is now established Deletion of Sophie Gradon WP:CELEBRITY||WP:H Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3842 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Dublin Football League User:BigDom 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC) delete Unless we're going to set some absurd precedence that all schoolboy and junior leagues deserve an article on Wikipedia, this one has no place here. Nobody would argue that the Accrington and District Junior Football League should have an article and that league is 51 years old and the strongest junior league in Hyndburn(!). There's no sources to suggest that the league passes the |general notability guidelines and the clubs in the league are not eligible for any national senior competition Deletion of South Dublin Football League WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3843 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Williams (comedian) User:NZFC 05:20, 3 August 2021 (UTC) keep my feeling is he meets now, with performances at Edinburgh and Melbourne and around New Zealand for comedy. On TV with Taskmasker and put out music. I did find some more sources as well with https://www.pressreader.com/new-zealand/the-southland-times/20210702/281479279396733 Southland Times, https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/afternoons/audio/2018800016/bookmarks-with-paul-williams Radio NZ, https://thespinoff.co.nz/partner/barkers-1972/11-05-2019/my-obsession-guy-and-paul-williams-on-their-love-of-basketball/ The Spinoff, https://www.nzonscreen.com/interviews/funny-as/paul-williams NZ OnScreen, https://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/stage-and-theatre/85310163/finalists-for-the-2017-billy-t-award-have-been-announced two Stuff https://www.stuff.co.nz/nelson-mail/news/85468547/nelson-comedian-paul-williams-up-for-billy-t-award articles and https://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/spy-meet-newsboys-new-newsboy-on-new-show-taskmaster/A7KREFI6Y6G3ESLVA5GH7IT364/ The New Zealand Herald. — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Deletion of Paul Williams (comedian) WP:ENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3844 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leigh Remedios User:1292simon 12:46, 2 May 2013 (UTC) delete fails for starters Deletion of Leigh Remedios WP:NMMA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3845 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brendan Munnerlyn [[User talk:204.126.132.231|talk]]) 18:38, 30 July 2014 (UTC) delete Fails and .Special:Contributions/204.126.132.231|204.126.132.231 Deletion of Brendan Munnerlyn WP:NGRIDIRON||WP:NCOLLATH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3846 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patchy the Pirate User:Antepenultimate 01:44, 30 January 2007 (UTC) keep barring that: Try to '''Merge''' with SpongeBob SquarePants or List of SpongeBob SquarePants characters - except both of those articles seem to be approaching the limits of . Article definately needs cleanup in any sense. If lack of sources is the real problem, then it should be tagged as unsourced Deletion of Patchy the Pirate WP:SIZE Wikipedia:Article size 3 +3847 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of controversial Don Imus quotes on women and minorities User:Craigtalbert 10:53, 15 April 2007 (UTC) delete article has already been transwikied, delete per as suggested previously Deletion of List of controversial Don Imus quotes on women and minorities WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3848 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nedim Malicbegovic (2nd nomination) User:Thincat 23:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC) delete """because there is no demonstration of our notability guidelines being met. However, I'd like to put in a word for Adam who would be right to remove an A7 CSD if he genuinely believed there was an indication of importance or significance. I think the advice he has been given on his talk page is good but it should be regarded as advice, not instruction. Administrators (and old-timers like me) get things wrong sometimes. Some administrators do not understand that #A7 is not a notability criterion and really far too many do not understand that #G4 only applies to """"substantially identical"""" articles or versions. For me, ill-judged notability AFD nominations are generally a worse problem than CSD removals""" Deletion of Nedim Malicbegovic (2nd nomination) WP:CSD||WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +3849 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evandro Rachoni De Lima User:Yellow 10:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC) keep passes per multiple reliable and in-depth sources found by Fenix down Deletion of Evandro Rachoni De Lima WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3850 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reiko Sugahara User:Michitaro 16:40, 30 December 2012 (UTC) delete I did some more searching in Japanese, this time focusing on her various projects (Bijou Factory, Smile Make Kyokai, etc.), but again couldn't find anything. There's a lot of hits, but virtually all of them are self-produced or PR. There are just not enough independent and significant RS to pass Deletion of Reiko Sugahara WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3851 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leon Fresco User:Hongkongresident 03:05, 19 November 2010 (UTC) delete A http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Leon+Fresco%22&hl=en&safe=off&rlz=1T4TSNA_enUS385US385&tbs=nws:1,ar:1&source=lnt&sa=X&ei=LejlTJngC8Gs8Ab-svG9DQ&ved=0CBEQpwU few references by the Miami Herald, but the mentions are trivial, thus not meeting the and guidelines. Article claims that the subject has won the awards, which may be true (although there's little out there to verify it), but it looks like none of them were major enough to merit any press coverage Deletion of Leon Fresco WP:RS||WP:N Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3852 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beautiful (Aretha Henry album) User:Broccoli 21:46, 12 June 2018 (UTC) delete not notable, likely with article creators Deletion of Beautiful (Aretha Henry album) WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +3853 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memorial High School Memories (Hedwig Village, Texas) User:Metropolitan90 05:01, 25 April 2006 (UTC) delete Wikipedia is not a high school yearbook. Please review if you still think this is an appropriate article Deletion of Memorial High School Memories (Hedwig Village, Texas) WP:VANITY Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +3854 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olaolu Akorede Olabode (2nd nomination) User:PohranicniStraze 04:27, 15 July 2018 (UTC) delete Being nominated for an award is not enough to meet . Lack of |reliable source coverage to prove notability Deletion of Olaolu Akorede Olabode (2nd nomination) WP:NFILMMAKER||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3855 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roland Agambire User:DJAMP4444 09:02, 5 June 2014 (UTC) delete It clearly meets . If it was PRODed before and no change happened, get an administrator to delete it ASAP Deletion of Roland Agambire WP:BLPPROD Wikipedia:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people 54 +3856 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey Stinson User:Jujutacular 03:59, 26 August 2009 (UTC) delete The only source is trivial (IMDB). |Non-notable Deletion of Joey Stinson WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3857 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FIFA Street series soundtracks User:Stifle 18:22, 30 September 2007 (UTC) delete per points 1 and 3 Deletion of FIFA Street series soundtracks WP:LC Wikipedia:Listcruft 66 +3858 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Privacy in facebook User:Scientizzle 21:08, 7 June 2010 (UTC) delete """given that this appears to be a copy of a written product by multiple individuals (initial edit summary by article creator: """"i and my class mates create this as our academic assignment at Orebro university , Sweden""""), I think is a valid concern. As a group project, it would require '''everyone's''' approval to license this work appropriately, a task I'm not sure is particualrly feasible or worth doing. Thus, deletion seems the most reasonable route. I agree that it's a plausible search term, however, and a redirect to Criticism of Facebook should definitely be left in its place; a future sub-article on this topic isn't unreasonable. As for the sources, I don't see much that seems too obviously useful, but I'd be willing, on request, post-deletion, to move citations & links to Talk:Criticism of Facebook that might be relevant. &mdash""" Deletion of Privacy in facebook WP:COPYRIGHT Wikipedia:Copyrights 60 +3859 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Vandenbroek User:Alias 20:08, 15 July 2006 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Kevin Vandenbroek WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3860 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elazar Abuhatzeira User:Nsk92 10:55, 4 August 2011 (UTC) keep There is certainly plenty of ongoing coverage of his death, including international coverage. This might have qualified under but he appears to have been a prominent and controversial figure before his murder as well. E.g. there are articles about him from 2010 in Ha'aretzhttp://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/u-s-prosecutors-probing-israeli-rabbi-over-fraud-1.263504,http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/n-y-jews-accuse-be-er-sheva-kabbalist-of-massive-fraud-1.263772 and in New York Posthttp://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/brooklyn/rabbi_runs_kabbalah_con_in_ny_qbrPadCHtGP6LspsGPzPqI, again Ha'aretz in 2003http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/fraud-probe-against-abuhatzeira-dropped-1.16734, Jerusalem Post in 2004http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/jpost/access/620487351.html?dids=620487351:620487351&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Apr+15%2C+2004&author=David+Rudge%2C+Etgar+Lefkovits%2C+Dan+Izenberg%2C+Abigail+Radoszkowicz&pub=Jerusalem+Post&desc=News+in+brief&pqatl=google, etc. As Cullen328 notes, presumably many more sources exist in Hebrew language press. Passes Deletion of Elazar Abuhatzeira WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BIO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3861 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bihar Startup Policy User:Steve NONE delete sources are a mish-mash of coverage about various subjects such as the Bihar sector, an entrepreneurs' organization, routine financial and investment information, an argument and police action at some sort of Bihar conference, one article that is passing mention of Bihar Startup Policy and so on. There is no significant coverage of this topic in any of the available sources. Fails CORPDEPTH and GNG. Also this seems to be an attempt to cobble together unrelated subjects under the heading of this article title. This could be construed as Deletion of Bihar Startup Policy WP:SYNTH Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3862 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NCircle User:Gavin 09:48, 28 July 2009 (UTC) delete as this |linkfarm is pure |spam. In any case, there is no evidence that this company, its products (or should I refer to them as nProducts?), employees or directors are notable Deletion of NCircle WP:LINKFARM||WP:SPAM Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3863 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meggan Scavio User:scope_creep 12:12, 21 August 2021 (UTC) keep More than enough to satisfy and clearly notable enough for Deletion of Meggan Scavio WP:SIGCOV||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3864 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tata Technologies User:Yash 21:40, 5 May 2015 (UTC) keep Tata is one of the prominent groups in India. Despite of the poor quality of it, this article is very notable. A quick search shows some significant coverage: http://m.timesofindia.com/business/india-business/PEs-vie-for-520-million-Tata-Tech-stake/articleshow/47006986.cms http://www.siliconindia.com/magazine-articles-in/TATA_Technologies_Building_Competitive_Advantage_with_Effective_Implementation__Use_of_Product_Lifecycle_Management-SJGH484314419.html http://m.economictimes.com/industry/auto/news/industry/tata-motors-and-tata-capital-are-looking-to-sell-their-90-stake-in-tata-technologies/articleshow/46830423.cms http://m.timesofindia.com/business/india-business/Tata-Tech-eyes-250m-buys-to-hit-1bn-sales/articleshow/46337156.cms. Easily passes and . —  Deletion of Tata Technologies WP:GNG||WP:COMPANY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3865 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cockpuppet User:Danny 22:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Cockpuppet WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +3866 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rush Tully User:Voceditenore 20:24, 8 September 2015 (UTC) delete """This was a very (self)promotional article and entirely unreferenced. I've cleaned it up, removing the most glaring self-serving claims and puffery (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rush_Tully&oldid=666567072 this is what it looked like prior to clean up) and then looked for any coverage of this person. Everything that I could find is now in the article as citations but it simply isn't enough to pass either the General Notability Guideline () or the alternative criteria at . It doesn't even come close. Despite the original claim to have """"performed many seasons with Lyric Opera of Chicago"""", the LOC archives list him for only two seasons and all in extremely minor roles. The only other performances I could verify are with a very small company, Skylight Music Theatre, and again generally not in leading roles, and again only with passing mentions in local reviews. The solo CD is self-published. He gets a passing mention for a score he wrote for an artist I've never heard of in the ''Albuquerque Journal'', but none of his compositions appear to have been published or held in libraries. A search of WorldCat returns only a CD of hymns recorded by choir members from four churches in Minnesota, where he is listed as one of several soloists http://www.worldcat.org/title/sunday-worship/oclc/56611653&referer=brief_results. I can find no sources whatsoever which verify ''any'' of the other biographical """"information"""" in the article""" Deletion of Rush Tully WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3867 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saudi Real Estate Companion User:E 19:17, 18 June 2019 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Saudi Real Estate Companion WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3868 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artificial controversy (2 nomination) User:Robofish 21:26, 28 February 2010 (UTC) keep The article needs improvement (to say more about the subject, rather than just a list of examples), and I understand the concerns, but I think it's also clear that this is a real and widely-used concept which is deserving of an article. It should also perhaps be moved to Manufactured controversy, as that seems to be the more popular term Deletion of Artificial controversy (2 nomination) WP:SYNTH Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3869 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Daniel (film) [[User talk:Begoon|Begoon]] 11:16, 1 September 2019 (UTC) delete Fails . Note that there is also a draft, Draft:Jack Daniel (film) where work could continue if more coverage is found Deletion of Jack Daniel (film) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3870 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association of Proposal Management Professionals User:RoySmith 14:43, 12 August 2017 (UTC) delete My own searching failed to find any . Fails Deletion of Association of Proposal Management Professionals WP:RS||WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3871 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cherie Gil User:Silver 05:06, 28 March 2010 (UTC) comment I have tagged this article for |rescue Deletion of Cherie Gil WP:ARS Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron 46 +3872 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birgitte Bak-Jensen User:Russ 21:34, 7 October 2020 (UTC) keep per C1, via plenty of highly-cited papers Deletion of Birgitte Bak-Jensen WP:NPROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3873 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Earl Hughes User:Narutolovehinata5 23:22, 26 March 2010 (UTC) comment It's getting pretty |snowy around here. Mind if someone or I could close this as snowball keep Deletion of Robert Earl Hughes WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +3874 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaafar Aksikas User:Eric 16:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC) delete Does not seem to pass notability requirements under or . As pointed out by Hqb and Crusio, not just any journal can be used to satisfy criterion #8 (editor-in-chief of established journal Deletion of Jaafar Aksikas WP:PROF||WP:BIO||WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3875 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dark One User:Thunderwing 21:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC) delete per Deletion of The Dark One WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3876 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masonic Lodges of North Carolina User:Jclemens 19:28, 10 February 2012 (UTC) keep """The nomination statement fundamentally misunderstands ; all """"X in one (geographical location)"""" is not indiscriminate, nor is an exhaustive listing a """"directory"""" in the sense used by #DIR. Sources present seem adequate and authoritative""" Deletion of Masonic Lodges of North Carolina WP:IINFO||WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3877 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuldip dhindsa User:Ohconfucius 12:39, 24 June 2008 (UTC) delete not hard to believe this is a |spammy |vanity article, but harder to believe it is a |copyright violation for its poor English for a man of such impeccable credentials (''sic Deletion of Kuldip dhindsa WP:SPAM||WP:COI||WP:COPY Wikipedia:Spam 26 +3878 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ekramuddin Ahmad User:Nosebagbear 11:50, 11 August 2018 (UTC) keep both and seem satisfied by Worldbruce's sources Deletion of Ekramuddin Ahmad WP:BASIC||WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3879 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IBM 1130/snoopy calendar User:Work 17:05, 6 May 2007 (UTC) keep Sometimes you have to . This is part of computing history. Agree it's not well sourced but of course this was before email and ftp Deletion of IBM 1130/snoopy calendar WP:IAR Wikipedia:Ignore all rules 63 +3880 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Bixby User:Bonadea 11:47, 17 March 2018 (UTC) delete I can't find any sources showing that the artist meets  or . I have removed some of the art jargon/promotion from the article - some of that was copyright violating text as well Deletion of Brian Bixby WP:NARTIST||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3881 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pop Star (film) User:HTGS 22:41, 20 June 2021 (UTC) delete The film, so far as I have been able to tell, does not pass . I also have concerns about a string of single-purpose accounts covering the actress Robin Bain, and her work, namely this film and the films: Girl Lost, wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hollywood Sex Wars|Hollywood Sex Wars (deleted), wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eat Cake|Eat Cake (deleted) and wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wishful Thinking (2004 film)|Wishful Thinking (deleted). —  Deletion of Pop Star (film) WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3882 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Deacove User:Bearcat 20:16, 10 December 2018 (UTC) delete """The references are all either |primary source directory entries or unreliable sources, not |reliable source coverage in real media, but nothing stated in the article body is """"inherently"""" notable enough to exempt him from having to have much better referencing than this""" Deletion of Jim Deacove WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3883 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parenting practices User:Ihcoyc 15:27, 16 May 2008 (UTC) merge """to Parenting practices and social stratification in the United States and '''keep'''. This is not """"|original research"""" by our definition; the views expressed in the page are a synopsis of published research by an authority in the field. I don't see how this is a |how-to guide at all. As noted above, the article is quite readable and clear, and is otherwise an ''excellent'' contribution. The problem is that the title """"parenting practices"""" gives rise to an expectation of a general article about parenting, with a worldwide perspective: and this article is not that. Moving this to a title that actually describes its content fixes that""" Deletion of Parenting practices WP:OR||WP:HOWTO Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3884 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elide [[User talk:Kaustuv|Kaustuv Chaudhuri]] 16:03, 15 July 2006 (UTC) comment advertising is not a |CSD. Here's what says on this topic: '''''Advertisements or spam''': These may be subject to deletion, but not speedy deletion. There is often a chance to replace them with an NPOV version instead Deletion of Elide WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +3885 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SkillSlate User:Ihcoyc 20:37, 13 November 2010 (UTC) delete vehemently. This is yet another search engine manipulation business (''According to a website description, SkillSlate helps the pages of service providers surface more prominently in search engine queries'') using Wikipedia to manipulate search engines. References given are entirely routine announcements of funding or local events that do not come close to meeting |the business notability guideline. Article is |advertising from beginning to end Deletion of SkillSlate WP:CORP||WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3886 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitty (porn star) User:Obina 22:35, 11 January 2006 (UTC) delete Not notable enough for ,, per Obli, adult entertainer can be notable, but we can't use same movie or google counts as other potentially notable people Deletion of Kitty (porn star) WP:BIO||WP:BLP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3887 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priyanka Fernando User:Mztourist 15:18, 18 May 2020 (UTC) delete """while rank satisfies #2 of that is just a presumption of notability, i.e that """"they have received significant coverage in multiple verifiable independent, reliable sources."""" I'm not seeing that for Fernando""" Deletion of Priyanka Fernando WP:SOLDIER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3888 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Vandal User:Petaholmes 00:38, 19 January 2006 (UTC) keep well known Australian band, with several albums, meets Deletion of Nancy Vandal WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3889 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leviton User:Durova 21:45, 9 April 2007 (UTC) comment This single purpose account was created yesterday and I have blocked it for 1 month for violations of , , , , and Deletion of Leviton WP:OWN||WP:NOT||WP:NPOV||WP:VANDAL||WP:COI Wikipedia:Ownership of content 43 +3890 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AgileGraph User:PianoDan 00:46, 18 January 2013 (UTC) delete fails . I don't understand why it wasn't deleted the last time Deletion of AgileGraph WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3891 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catia Ojeda User:Aoba47 20:17, 28 November 2016 (UTC) delete per and AngusWOOF's comment above. A promising start and this could be appropriate in the future, but just not right now Deletion of Catia Ojeda WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +3892 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikhil Utkal Adivasi Congress User:Soman 13:29, 21 June 2020 (UTC) keep I'll try to beef up the article with some additional refs over the coming 48 hours. There isn't a lot of material (tribal politics in Orissa in 1950s isn't very well covered by online refs...). But in the meantime, the party was represented in national parliament per https://loksabha.nic.in/members/partyardetail.aspx?party_code=88&lsno=1 and thus passes Deletion of Nikhil Utkal Adivasi Congress WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3893 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional books from non-print media User:Clarityfiend 19:34, 5 February 2020 (UTC) delete per flurries. I've also nominated its periodical counterpart Deletion of List of fictional books from non-print media WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +3894 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WFCA Plc User:Mikeman67 09:20, 7 February 2014 (UTC) delete Per , while the company is mentioned in online trade publications, the mentions are all incidental. Other references are simply press releases or announcements of awards. I couldn't find any mention in regional or national news at all. I don't think it meets the criteria for Deletion of WFCA Plc WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:COMPANY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3895 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Russell Fowler User:Location 22:05, 13 June 2010 (UTC) delete Fails and . There is a lack of significant coverage in independent reliable sources Deletion of Nick Russell Fowler WP:CREATIVE||WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3896 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Joseph School, Gagalangin User:Narutolovehinata5 12:37, 13 February 2018 (UTC) delete It appears that is no longer binding, so because the school appears to lack coverage in reliable sources (and indeed, the school does not even appear to have much online presence either), this fails Deletion of St Joseph School, Gagalangin WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +3897 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libido Airbag User:Nuttah68 12:15, 11 February 2007 (UTC) delete unless some reliable sources showing how they meet are provided. The fact that it is a side project of GUT (band) doesn't help because that article offers no more than this Deletion of Libido Airbag WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3898 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manoj Srivastava User:Bearian 22:32, 28 July 2014 (UTC) delete per and . I could see, by scanning the references, that this was poorly sourced. In cleaning up the citations, I noted immediately (1) one cite was to another Wikipedia article, and (2) one had http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/news-interviews/Film-shoots-in-Goa-Rs-100-cr-biz/articleshow/7770082.cms?referral=PM the barest of passing mentions. Two references are from http://iffigoa.org his own organization's website, and two more are passing references from the Indian MPAA. I actually found some additional sources, but http://www.bestmediainfo.com/2014/07/5th-jagran-film-festival-concludes-in-delhi-to-travel-across-15-more-cities/ this one is another passing mention and https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Manoj+Srivastava%22+site:news.google.com/newspapers&source=newspapers&gws_rd=ssl this one is a syndicated article about his reaction to a flood Deletion of Manoj Srivastava WP:42||WP:CREATIVE Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything 79 +3899 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1776 (company) User:AmericanAir88 00:31, 12 September 2018 (UTC) delete Spam and an advertisement. Fails Deletion of 1776 (company) WP:PROMO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3900 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Division Street, Manhattan User:Bearian 19:41, 28 December 2007 (UTC) delete per Grutness. I know the area, and it is ''not'' |notable in any sense of the word. This is a side street. Most of the sites cited are actually ''not'' on Division Street (for example, Eldridge Street Synagogue, Seward Park (Manhattan), and Confucius Plaza are ''off'' Division Street). The other sites are just plainly not notable - no links or would-be red links. Sorry, folks, this does not cut k, the most revelant guildline/essay. Possibly redirect to Lower East Side Deletion of Division Street, Manhattan WP:N||WP:50 Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3901 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Refined sugar and ritalin User:Dustimagic 03:46, 12 February 2006 (UTC) delete per nomination, |POV Deletion of Refined sugar and ritalin WP:POV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +3902 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lilia Mai (2nd nomination) User:Eggishorn 01:47, 8 May 2018 (UTC) delete The links that can be considered significant coverage in the article are all press releases or otherwise non-independent coverage. No evidence in article or in searches that this singer qualifies under or Deletion of Lilia Mai (2nd nomination) WP:NMUSIC||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3903 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hairline Illusions User:Inthepubliceye 15:56, 15 April 2013 (UTC) delete lacking in information and sources. Hint of in the style of the writing Deletion of Hairline Illusions WP:PROMO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3904 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadowban User:Seed 06:34, 7 June 2007 (UTC) delete per above and nom. A little context for those uninvolved with the issue: Fark.com redesigned their website in late April of this year without consulting with their userbase or even prior announcement, which was a bit unusual. There was some uproar among its users, many claimed they had canceled their paid subscriptions and some users started a spin-off site. Almost since back then, members of that site have tried to get that site's domainname into the main Fark article which has lead to an extended edit war (please check http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fark.com&action=history the article's history), full page protection, semi-protection less than 24 hours after it was unprotected and an extended discussion on the Talk:Fark.com|Fark.com talk page. Yesterday, there was even a thread on their site specifically announcing that the article was good to be edited by unregistered users again.This article is another, albeit somewhat clever, attempt at getting the domain name into the article. I strongly assume that this not so much out of a genuine desire to write an article about 'Shadowbanning' but the result of the realization that adding the domainname to the article by itself, as part of major sites like reddit and digg, as part of that article's 'Filters' section (all of which can be easily verified by checking the history) and now as a separate 'criticism' section will quickly result in a revert. Fact is, It's still a non-notable website and the article still lacks reliable sources for a very simple reason: there are none. The screen shots are and this has been explained in detail by multiple users, myself included, again and again. (FD: I wasn't involved in the edit war in any way, shape or form but I am keeping an eye on the article since I requested its unprotection after about a month of full protection.) This attempt at self-promotion has taken up way too much time already that could have been spent doing something productive. Hence, my !vote Deletion of Shadowban WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3905 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Youth Friendship Games User:AO 10:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC) delete I heard about it, but no one else I know does. It fails Deletion of Youth Friendship Games WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3906 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoes.com User:Satori 20:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC) delete As written, article does not provide info on subject that meets any of the three criteria in Deletion of Hoes.com WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3907 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosary ASA User:danntm 01:05, 4 January 2007 (UTC) delete an organization at a single church is not national, thus fails Deletion of Rosary ASA WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3908 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harrogate bus route 36 User:Strato6 08:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC) keep some more cites needed, but secondary coverage from multiple sources has resulted in an article that is more than just a copy of a timetable. And with no listing of frequencies, hours of operation, fares etc anyone trying to plan a journey using the article would not find enough info here, making a moot point Deletion of Harrogate bus route 36 WP:NOTGUIDE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3909 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brain Occupation in Traditional Chinese Medicine [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']] 03:47, 17 December 2012 (UTC) delete the sources provided aren't about Chinese medicine at all. This looks to be an essay based on some tenuously referenced (, basically) ideas and concepts Deletion of Brain Occupation in Traditional Chinese Medicine WP:OR||WP:SYNTH Wikipedia:No original research 12 +3910 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/411mania (2nd nomination) User:Carlossuarez46 21:08, 28 September 2007 (UTC) delete fails the passing mentions in mainstream media come nowhere near that threshold, which we have for a reason Deletion of 411mania (2nd nomination) WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3911 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of television and radio stations in Zamboanga City User:Hmains 17:34, 12 November 2007 (UTC) keep No reason to target this Phillipines city radio and TV stations list. The :Category:Lists of radio stations and :Category:Lists of television channels shows that such lists are well established for various cities throughout the world. Argument made about 'directory' #DIR can be used against each and every list in WP, but WP accepts lists as part of WP so deletion argument has no merit Deletion of List of television and radio stations in Zamboanga City WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3912 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steg steganography software User:Ohnoitsjamie 14:49, 20 March 2018 (UTC) delete No evidence that this meet notability guidelines Deletion of Steg steganography software WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3913 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/6yd User:Kuru 22:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC) delete not really close to , one year old front for google ads. Alexa in the 4m+ range and almost zero external references. Why was this de-prodded Deletion of 6yd WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3914 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruelle (group) User:Lowellian 05:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC) keep """The article (''not'' created by me) was https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruelle_%28singer%29&oldid=774385563 very much a stub when initially nominated, but the proper action for a notable subject is cleanup and expansion, not deletion. The article needs to be renamed to """"Ruelle (singer)"""" and expanded, but she is definitely notable from her widespread presence in television and film: she is the singer of not just incidental music, but the ''main/opening'' theme songs for both ''Shadowhunters'' (""""This Is the Hunt"""") and ''The Shannara Chronicles'' (""""Until We Go Down""""). Beyond those main opening titles, her songs have also been featured in ''numerous'' primetime television series http://www.tunefind.com/artist/ruelle on multiple television network|networks, including ''Dancing with the Stars (U.S. TV series)|Dancing with the Stars'', ''How to Get Away with Murder'', ''Pretty Little Liars'', ''Quantico (TV series)|Quantico'', ''Revenge (TV series)|Revenge'', ''Scream (TV series)|Scream'', ''Teen Wolf (2011 TV series)|Teen Wolf'', ''The Vampire Diaries'', ''The Walking Dead (TV series)|The Walking Dead'', and ''many'' more. On film, she is featured on both the trailer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08JRDC4-kug and the soundtrack http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1850397/soundtrack for ''The Loft (film)|The Loft''. That widespread use of her music more than satisfies criteria #10 on . Furthermore, she has collaborated with other notable musical groups, for instance, providing the vocals on the Ki Theory|Ki:Theory song """"Bringing Me Down"""" http://kitheory.spinshop.com/Home/details/250420 http://www.purevolume.com/news/PREMIERE-KiTheory-Bringing-Me-Down-ft-Ruelle http://www.soundfiction.net/2017/03/29/kitheory-releases-new-single-bringing-announces-silence-album-pre-orders. She has been a Wikipedia:Requested articles/music/Performers, bands and songwriters|requested article for over a year, since March 2016 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_articles/music/Performers,_bands_and_songwriters&diff=708112359&oldid=707770304. As for independent, third-party coverage, she has been interviewed by ''Culture Collide'' http://www.culturecollide.com/reviews/detail/ruelle_reps_electro_pop_in_nashville, the ''Society Cynic'' http://thesocietycynic.com/the-literary-review-blog/exclusive-interview-with-maggie-eckford-ruelle, and ''Young Entertainment'' magazine https://youngentertainmentmag.com/ye-talks-to-haunting-songstress-ruelle/. She is the subject of an ''AllMusic'' profile http://www.allmusic.com/artist/ruelle-mn0003439471/biography and of articles by ''Bookstacked'' http://bookstacked.com/features/ruelle-songs-shadowhunters/, ''Beyond the Stage'' magazine http://www.beyondthestagemagazine.com/new-music-monday-ruelle/, Freeform (TV channel)|Freeform http://freeform.go.com/shows/shadowhunters/news/ruelle-the-woman-behind-the-music-from-that-clace-kiss, and MTV http://www.mtv.com/news/2548733/shannara-chronicles-opening-credits/. Finally, her song """"I Get to Love You"""" reached #15 on the Billboard charts|''Billboard'' Spotify Viral 50 chart http://www.billboard.com/artist/6889562/ruelle/chart?f=2206""" Deletion of Ruelle (group) WP:NMUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3915 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2 Girls 1 Cup User:HisSpaceResearch 21:14, 20 February 2008 (UTC) keep passes enough to have a decent-sized article on with twelve sources, and Wikipedia is not censored Deletion of 2 Girls 1 Cup WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +3916 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Before I Weigh User:Whpq 17:04, 2 November 2011 (UTC) merge """to Cellulite Soul. There is a guideline for |""""just another single"""". I don't see the coverage that would justify a separate article for the song""" Deletion of Before I Weigh WP:NSONG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3917 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crocker Highlands Elementary School User:TerriersFan 18:13, 29 February 2008 (UTC) keep first of all the nomination lacks any grounds on which to base deletion. Also, in addition to the source above, there are enough sources available to meet . Following the paralysis of a student caught up in a shooting the school has had significant media coverage, for instance http://www.ktvu.com/news/15059075/detail.html here. Also there has been coverage of a book that the students published, for example http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-3985697.html here. Further, the school was a pilot for a new staff selection process http://moreresults.factiva.com/results/index/index.aspx?ref=CCT0000020070105e31500049 here and the school has been the focus of efforts to encourage parents to keep their children within the public school system http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=CC&s_site=contracostatimes&p_multi=CC&p_theme=realcities&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=1064A15232F45AC9&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM here Deletion of Crocker Highlands Elementary School WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3918 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legal Community Against Violence User:J1nx1337 23:37, 15 February 2013 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Legal Community Against Violence WP:GNG||WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3919 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saskatchewan Highway 703 User:Alansohn 05:38, 21 October 2007 (UTC) keep Per , consensus is clear that state/provincial roads are notable Deletion of Saskatchewan Highway 703 WP:OUTCOMES Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +3920 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devoucoux (2nd nomination) User:Boston 22:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC) comment certainly |notability is not established but I suspect notability might actually exist. I'm going to try to rescue this one Deletion of Devoucoux (2nd nomination) Wikipedia:Notability Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3921 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virgil W. Magee (second nomination) User:Carlosguitar 02:12, 28 September 2007 (UTC) delete non-|notable person Deletion of Virgil W. Magee (second nomination) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3922 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuck on the Beach User:ErikTheBikeMan 22:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC) delete I'm not sure how this could possibly meet Deletion of Fuck on the Beach WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3923 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TWBPSK Kevin Ray's Corner Blog User:Proto 10:32, 12 January 2006 (UTC) delete Speedy delete''' as advertising if possible. Fails Deletion of TWBPSK Kevin Ray's Corner Blog WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3924 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan DeGennaro User:Dirtlawyer1 18:43, 20 June 2013 (UTC) delete """Seriously? The """"head strength and conditioning coach"""" for the Carnegie-Mellon Tartans? Sorry, but this is an extremely weak article topic, and I see no signs of in-depth coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources to satisfy the general notability guidelines per """ Deletion of Alan DeGennaro WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3925 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Gul Mallah (2nd nomination) User:Bearian 17:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC) delete per - it has already been deleted Deletion of Ali Gul Mallah (2nd nomination) WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +3926 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fixiraq.com User:Coredesat 09:44, 22 July 2006 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Fixiraq.com WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3927 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Affiliation Quebec User:Eusebeus 13:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC) delete """Weighing in as a Montrealer, I have some familiarity with this """"party."""" The total whacko (Nutik) is setting up his new """"Equality Party"""" light as a vehicle for his own backyard ambition; he has thrice run unsuccessfully for the mayor of Westmount, garnering truly tiny amounts of votes. If he cannot even make a splash in a Westmount municipal election, running on de-merger, partition, and anglo issues, the chances of his establishing an Anglo-rights party a la Howard Galganov are virtually minuscule. Unfortunately, the emotion surrounding Quebec independence and anglophone/allophone rights & status is such that even such trivial efforts as this get some play-time. That should not, however, be conflated with notability. So, based on all that, this totally fails the standard laid out at . If, by some miracle, they get accreditation then the article can be restored. Meanwhile, I'll be at the local Sports Expert buying a new pair of skates to take with me to hell""" Deletion of Affiliation Quebec WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3928 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derrick Van Orden User:SportingFlyer 20:52, 23 April 2020 (UTC) delete non-notable political candidate, not convinced by the argument Deletion of Derrick Van Orden WP:SOLDIER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3929 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The African-American Historical News Journal User:Kudpung 06:59, 10 June 2015 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of The African-American Historical News Journal WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3930 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asia Commons User:Paul 17:17, 19 September 2020 (UTC) delete This was originally about a conference held in 2006, which doesn't seem to go past . The Special:Diff/60008359|later edit which attempted to introduce coverage of this as a concept seems to be largely unrelated OR Deletion of Asia Commons WP:NEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3931 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Alabama Crimson Tide football team User:LM2000 07:48, 17 January 2014 (UTC) delete per Deletion of 2015 Alabama Crimson Tide football team WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3932 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultimate Fantastic Four (story arcs) User:Psyphics 04:47, 16 October 2006 (UTC) delete per and ; all pertinent information is in Ultimate Fantastic Four already Deletion of Ultimate Fantastic Four (story arcs) WP:WAF||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +3933 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Thomas (basketball) User:Edgars2007 11:13, 15 June 2012 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Ben Thomas (basketball) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3934 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Make limstone in your own kitchen! User:Persian 03:09, 2 February 2007 (UTC) delete unencyclopedic, sections are short and lack content, article violates #INDISCRIMINATE Deletion of Make limstone in your own kitchen! WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3935 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Losasso User:Boffob 15:52, 15 December 2008 (UTC) delete having an IMDB page is not sufficient to establish notability. Given the lack of roles in other productions and the lack of sources in general, it is highly doubtful that this person passes the |notability guidelines Deletion of Peter Losasso WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3936 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TeamCHS NONE NONE delete per nomination, or speedy A7: not mentioned in any (including the sources cited), only mentioned in claims on web forums Deletion of TeamCHS WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3937 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karl Keogh User:Carioca 21:19, 12 April 2010 (UTC) delete He fails both , and Deletion of Karl Keogh WP:GNG||WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3938 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hair by Mr. Bean of London User:Sam 22:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC) keep """per the |notability guideline for TV-series and per long established precedent in : """"Television series broadcast nationally by a major network or produced by a major studio are usually kept as they are considered notable."""" I think it is fair to say that ''Mr. Bean'' has been widely broadcasted and rebroadcasted ''internationally'' for the past 25+ years, according to http://www.firstpost.com/entertainment/mr-bean-rides-again-rowan-atkinson-celebrates-25th-anniversary-of-show-at-buckingham-palace-2423830.html the video here in """"190 territores around the world"""". We have the parent article at ''Mr. Bean'' (not nominated for deletion), we have the episode list at List of Mr. Bean episodes|List of ''Mr. Bean'' episodes (not nominated for deletion), and then we have 15 individual episode articles (all are up for |unbundled deletion). This structure is the accepted standard per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Television and is fine per with a {{tl|Main}} in Mr. Bean|''Mr. Bean''#Episodes per . Lack of {{tq|information on the episode's production}} is not a -REASON|policy based reason for deletion, it is not even an article requirement, see . A few words {{tq|on its reception when broadcast}} would certainly be nice, but is not mandatory, see , and again, its absence is not a policy based reason for deletion, it's a argument. I agree with nom that most of these 15 articles are poorly sourced, but it is a argument to be avoided, as -T (policy) specifically suggests tagging for such problems, and because |notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article. And finally there is the question: why take these article to AfD in the first place instead of considering -M (policy) into List of Mr. Bean episodes|List of ''Mr. Bean'' episodes or a -R solution (policy)? If the titles did not exist and were requested at /R, I would not hesitate with responding to the request by creating them as |categorized {{tlx|R to TV episode list entry}} redirects""" Deletion of Hair by Mr. Bean of London WP:TVSERIES||WP:BCASTOUTCOMES||WP:BUNDLE||WP:SPINOFF||WP:SS||WP:DEL||WP:TVPRODUCTION||WP:TVRECEPTION||WP:NOTBUILT||WP:UNRS||WP:ATD||WP:NEXIST||WP:ATD||WP:ATD||WP:AFC||WP:RCAT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3939 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikIran (2nd nomination) User:Halo 07:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC) delete Small wikis that don't meet aren't notable. I worry that a simple Google search isn't valid to establish notability due to alledged spam on Wikipedia (according to ). I also think that due to the notablity of the Wikimedia Foundation, any contrast to something like Wikispecies is unfair - I believe a less-notable product by a bigger company is worthy of an article over a small product by a small company (if that makes sense Deletion of WikIran (2nd nomination) WP:WEB||WP:AN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3940 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mindspace User:K 21:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC) delete per : strictly advertorial content, with no indications of notability or significance Deletion of Mindspace WP:PROMO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3941 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearse dynasty User:Chzz 22:43, 15 April 2011 (UTC) delete No evidence of |notability. References given are not |reliable sources, and I have seen no evidence of any Deletion of Pearse dynasty WP:VRS||WP:RS Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything 79 +3942 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreuz Oranienburg User:The 02:13, 31 December 2015 (UTC) delete Autobahn interchanges are all named; there is no significant inference of notability from the mere fact that it is a named interchange. There is no apparent evidence that this meets . These should probably be part of a list - there would be no objection to redirects to the individual Autobahns' pages Deletion of Kreuz Oranienburg WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3943 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billard (slang) User:Armbrust 15:45, 2 May 2010 (UTC) delete as article fails Deletion of Billard (slang) WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +3944 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cat Beach User:Rjanag 04:38, 17 June 2009 (UTC) delete No evidence of notability, doesn't appear to satisfy the |notability criteria for musical artists. Quick google search turned up very few hits (most were unrelated hits), and none of them appeared to be |reliable sources with significant coverage; rather, they were just things like Myspace pages, etc Deletion of Cat Beach WP:BAND||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3945 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Londonistan (term) User:JamesBurns 00:48, 19 January 2009 (UTC) keep Article is reasonably well written. Precedent already set with Helengrad (vote was to keep), and I must admit I never heard of Helengrad until I read this AfD. The term Londonistan has already been used in a published title by author Melanie Phillips. PS. The argument that because some people find the term offensive therefore it must be deleted, is not a valid reason for deletion, see Deletion of Londonistan (term) WP:NOTCENSORED Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3946 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Beatty (author) User:Colapeninsula 08:54, 18 May 2015 (UTC) delete """There are very short reviews in Publishers Weeklyhttp://www.digitalpw.com/digitalpw/20150216?pg=68#pg68 and Library Journalhttp://reviews.libraryjournal.com/2015/05/media/audio-in-advance/kids-previews/chris-colfer-james-patterson-grimes-on-tubman-and-anthony-audio-in-advance-july-2015-middle-grade/ and some on blogs/social media, but not enough to meet . Can't find much about his other ventures either. Not notable. (I don't think the qualification """"author"""" is anything other than a likely indication of where his notability might lie""" Deletion of Robert Beatty (author) WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3947 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raghunath Ratabole User:Yunshui 12:38, 13 October 2011 (UTC) delete per nom, fails |the professor test Deletion of Raghunath Ratabole WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3948 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New R. S. J. Public School Senior Secondary User:The 22:34, 8 January 2014 (UTC) keep large secondary school that, when local research is carried out, will probably be able to be brought into compliance with . There is never much on the Internet about Indian schools, unlike say US schools, so we should avoid systemic bias and await hard copy searches Deletion of New R. S. J. Public School Senior Secondary WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3949 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skilgannon the Damned User:MacGyverMagic 23:50, 16 November 2008 (UTC) merge to Drenai Series (per Deletion of Skilgannon the Damned WP:FICT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3950 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uruguay Football League User:Lil 02:28, 10 January 2011 (UTC) delete this is obviously not an official football league. The article was written (most likely) by one of the four people who started the league of five teams. Either way it doesn't mean Deletion of Uruguay Football League WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3951 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dick Rodgers User:StAnselm 09:09, 23 October 2015 (UTC) keep definitely sources, but they're al in the The Common Good (political party)|party article.http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/northfield-priest-campaigns-in-newark-7212122http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-117764012.htmlhttp://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-143633110.htmlhttp://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-131849514.html Clear pass of Deletion of Dick Rodgers WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3952 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crumbs improv User:Stifle 17:31, 14 October 2007 (UTC) delete per , , and so on. If kept, move to a proper name Deletion of Crumbs improv WP:ORG||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3953 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savior (Rise Against song) User:ZooFari 02:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC) delete too soon. Sources lack per Deletion of Savior (Rise Against song) WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3954 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Treanor (2nd nomination) User:Atlantic306 16:08, 4 May 2019 (UTC) keep as passes with prominent roles in notable productions so needs to be included in the encyclopedia Deletion of Michael Treanor (2nd nomination) WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3955 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natsumi Harada User:Stifle 21:08, 20 September 2008 (UTC) delete The article does not |cite |reliable sources and as such does not comply with the |verifiability policy Deletion of Natsumi Harada WP:CITE||WP:RS||WP:V Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3956 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emraanakbar Enamdar User:Jmertel23 13:08, 21 November 2019 (UTC) delete WP:TOOSOON; fails Deletion of Emraanakbar Enamdar WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3957 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juliet Simms User:Oakshade 06:36, 8 January 2012 (UTC) keep The nom's sole argument for deletion is moot as it's no longer an un-sourced BLP violation. The coverage of this person in the sources provided by Northamerica1000 demonstrate easily passing and . Redirecting would be incorrect as the existing content about this person outside of Automatic Loveletter would be off-topic in that article Deletion of Juliet Simms WP:BIO||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3958 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Darren Scale user:Alf_photoman 22:07, 12 March 2007 (UTC) delete failing for lack of sources and , not verifiable Deletion of The Darren Scale WP:A||WP:V Wikipedia:Attribution 34 +3959 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 San Francisco International Airport runway incursion User:Dhaluza 09:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC) keep """From the second reference as quoted in the article: """"Federal Aviation Administration officials are calling a near-collision at San Francisco International Airport the most serious incident of its kind at the airport in at least a decade."""" That is prima facia claim of notability. We have two independent sources, the FAA and NTSB (which are completely independent), commenting on the severity of the incident, quoted in reliable published sources, so this meets the standard for . Also the controller was forced to recertify for their job, which would count as a severe reprimand, as outlined in the draft notability standards previously posted at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aviation/Aviation_accident_task_force#Notability guidelines""" Deletion of 2007 San Francisco International Airport runway incursion WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3960 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Restore The Broken User:Eagleash 22:23, 3 July 2021 (UTC) delete No indication of notability does not pass ; unable to find much, if anything, in the way of SIGCOV Deletion of Restore The Broken :WP:NMUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3961 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Screen 7 User:MarcoTolo 01:06, 22 July 2007 (UTC) delete WP:N, and apparently (not that COI is explicitly a deletion criteria Deletion of Screen 7 WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +3962 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casa Guidi (album) User:Schazjmd 18:08, 19 September 2019 (UTC) keep Meets #4 Deletion of Casa Guidi (album) WP:NALBUM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3963 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vic Joseph User:Cwmhiraeth 13:33, 8 January 2019 (UTC) delete fails to meet and Deletion of Vic Joseph WP:NBIO||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3964 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Games Research Inc user:Andrew 09:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC) keep per the excellent evidence provided by Cunard above. Our numerous policies clearly indicate that deletion is not appropriate and include , , , , , &c Deletion of Games Research Inc WP:ATD||WP:IMPERFECT||WP:NEXIST||WP:NOTPAPER||WP:PRESERVE Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +3965 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nina Concerts and Gigs User:JamesBurns 04:17, 28 December 2008 (UTC) delete listcruft, Deletion of List of Nina Concerts and Gigs WP:DIRECTORY Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3966 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faisal Sanitary Fitting User:HighKing 13:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC) delete Fails and GNG. Could have been speedy deleted. I tried to edit the article to strip away puffery and irrelevant details and I was left with a modified opening sentence Deletion of Faisal Sanitary Fitting WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3967 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alison Hartson User:AusLondonder 08:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC) delete Hartson may become notable in the future, but at the moment it unfortunately seems . No significant, in-depth coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources Deletion of Alison Hartson WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +3968 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James William Middleton User:Zoeydahling 05:17, 3 May 2011 (UTC) keep Although obviously not as well covered in the media as his sister Kate, James has been the subject of a number of articles in reliable news sources and is clearly of public interest. I believe he meets and therefore !vote for the article to be kept Deletion of James William Middleton WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3969 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romanian Secular-Humanist Association User:Kraxler 16:00, 19 May 2015 (UTC) comment The article was moved back from draft space to main space but had the AfD tag removed, which is not correct, since this discussion is not closed yet. I restored the tag. The sources are all either the organization's own website, or trivial mentions in directories and news about loosely related things. It fails , especially , so far. And talking of Icelandic Ethical Humanist Association: First, please check out , and second, that article should be nominated for deletion too, since there are no independent sources at all, that could establish notability Deletion of Romanian Secular-Humanist Association WP:NORG||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:OTHERSTUFF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3970 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blumpster User:Quarl NONE delete as Wikipedia:Avoid_neologisms|non-notable unstable neologism, i.e. protologism (|Wikipedia is not a dictionary). &mdash Deletion of Blumpster WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3971 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SHINE Medical Technologies User:JzG 10:19, 24 July 2015 (UTC) merge per DGG's comment. This is a Deletion of SHINE Medical Technologies WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +3972 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dog camp (2nd nomination) user:Andrew 14:57, 24 August 2020 (UTC) keep """This is obviously a cross between a dog park and kennel and so there are obvious |alternatives to deletion. It is not difficult to find more coverage such as ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=RJQXBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA109 Dogs in the Leisure Experience''. And I'm especially liking that they """"''typically screen potential canine guests for aggressive tendencies as they do not want to risk fights''"""" – Wikipedia should try this. See also """ Deletion of Dog camp (2nd nomination) WP:ATD||WP:BITE Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +3973 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonor Espinoza User:Green 05:22, 6 November 2013 (UTC) keep """per . The guidelines do not require sources to be in English. Newspapers in Colombia are acceptable, she is obviously more notable in Colombia where she lives and works than, say, the United States of America (to pick a country at random). Sources include: http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://www.cromos.com.co/especial-mujeres-inspiradoras/articulo-148456-leonor-espinosa-la-colombiana-mas-sazon&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%2522Leonor%2BEspinosa%2522%2Bsite:.co%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26hs%3DGWH%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26biw%3D1139%26bih%3D762,http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://www.jetset.com.co/edicion-impresa/temas-revista-jetset/articulo/leonor-espinosa-ferran-adria-colombiana/85271&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%2522Leonor%2BEspinosa%2522%2Bsite:.co%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26hs%3DGWH%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26biw%3D1139%26bih%3D762 (""""renowned chef""""), http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://www.elheraldo.co/tendencias/la-chef-leonor-espinosa-ahora-en-senal-colombia-130286&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%2522Leonor%2BEspinosa%2522%2Bsite:.co%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26hs%3DGWH%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26biw%3D1139%26bih%3D762,http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://www.fucsia.co/edicion-impresa/articulo/la-costena-cachaco/3961&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%2522Leonor%2BEspinosa%2522%2Bsite:.co%26start%3D10%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26biw%3D1139%26bih%3D762(""""one of the most recognized chefs Colombia""""), http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://www.culturaemedellin.gov.co/sites/CulturaE/rutae2011/Paginas/leonor_espinosa.aspx&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%2522Leonor%2BEspinosa%2522%2Bsite:.co%26start%3D10%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26biw%3D1139%26bih%3D762 (""""Conde Naste says one of 82 best restaurants in the world""""), http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://www.revistalabarra.com.co/news/2175/2179/Avesco-y-Leonor-Espinosa-se-unen-para-resaltar-sabores-colombianos.htm&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%2522Leonor%2BEspinosa%2522%2Bsite:.co%26start%3D10%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26biw%3D1139%26bih%3D762,http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://www.las2orillas.co/la-cocinera-persiguen-los-chefs/&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%2522Leonor%2BEspinosa%2522%2Bsite:.co%26start%3D20%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26biw%3D1139%26bih%3D762,http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://italia.embajada.gov.co/newsroom/news/2013-10-31/2102&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%2522Leonor%2BEspinosa%2522%2Bsite:.co%26start%3D20%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26biw%3D1139%26bih%3D762(""""Two of Colombia's most recognized chefs, Leonor Espinosa and Carlos Yanguas"""")(government website),http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://www.eluniversal.com.co/suplementos/viernes/al-rescate-de-los-sabores&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%2522Leonor%2BEspinosa%2522%2Bsite:.co%26start%3D30%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26biw%3D1139%26bih%3D762,http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://static.elespectador.co/impreso/unchatcon/imagen-243173-leonor-espinosa&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%2522Leonor%2BEspinosa%2522%2Bsite:.co%26start%3D30%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26biw%3D1139%26bih%3D762""" Deletion of Leonor Espinoza WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3974 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. K. Loganathan User:Mr 13:44, 5 November 2014 (UTC) delete unless evidence of notability can be found. Every source currently in the article either doesn't seem to mention Loganathan or is written by him. So there is no evidence of otability|significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, nor is there evidence that he meets any of the criteria at Deletion of Dr. K. Loganathan WP:N||WP:SCHOLAR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3975 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JayJay Oakey User:Papaursa 19:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC) delete """Fails to meet because of a lack of significant independent coverage. He's not even mentioned in several of the references, notability is not gained through your boxing trainer, and there's no evidence he achieved notability as a boxer () or weightlifter (). Being selected for the """"regional pre-selection trials"""" for the 2012 Olympics does not show notability""" Deletion of JayJay Oakey WP:GNG||WP:NBOX||WP:NSPORTS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3976 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClearView User:Kinu 01:21, 31 March 2006 (UTC) delete per . Optionally recreate as redirect to Clearview if the Wiki software won't automatically recognize it as such Deletion of ClearView WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3977 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Well Cementing User:Unscintillating 01:12, 14 October 2012 (UTC) merge """nbsp; This is a major topic in the news right now, associated with fracking.  A search on fracking """"well cementing"""" gives http://www.savecoloradofromfracking.org/whatgoeswrong/cementing.html this as the first ref.  Even though the nomination is not for notability, nominators should look for sources |before starting an AfD discussion.  The tens of thousands of sources found by the first editor to try to look for sources is not a surprise. """ Deletion of Well Cementing WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +3978 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2028 Summer Olympics User:JulesH 12:03, 8 July 2007 (UTC) keep """ doesn't apply to verifiable speculation that has been discussed in reliable sources. In fact, quoting from : """"... and 2036 Summer Olympics are not considered appropriate article topics because nothing can be said about them that is verifiable and not original research."""" This is a well-sourced article that is verifiable and does not contain original research""" Deletion of 2028 Summer Olympics WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3979 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyril Ogston User:Bearcat 07:59, 26 November 2020 (UTC) delete Founding a small settlement isn't a notability freebie in the absence of a -worthy volume of |reliable source coverage ''about'' him Deletion of Cyril Ogston WP:GNG||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3980 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hal Parrish User:Bearcat 19:24, 3 April 2017 (UTC) delete """without prejudice against recreation if somebody can put the emphasis where it belongs. A person does not get a Wikipedia article just for being a ''candidate'' in an election — either you show and properly source that he was ''already'' eligible for a Wikipedia article for some other reason ''independent'' of his candidacy, or he has to ''win'' the election, not just run in it, to clear the bar because of the election itself. Campaign coverage, further, does ''not'' assist a candidate for office in clearing GNG just for the candidacy — ''all'' candidates for office ''always'' garner campaign coverage, so such coverage is , not notability-building. If campaign coverage built notability in and of itself, we would always have to keep an article about every single candidate for any office at all. But we ''don't'' do that.Accordingly, in order for Parrish to get an article ''today'', the substance and the sourceability would have to be shifted onto his role as mayor of Manassas — and even then, Manassas is ''not'' large enough that he would get an automatic ''presumption'' of notability for that in the ''absence'' of a demonstrated pass, so there aren't grounds for an automatic """"keep because mayor"""" either. I'm willing to withdraw this ''if'' the substance and the weight sourcing are transferred onto his mayoralty — but until that actually happens, nothing present in ''this'' version of the article qualifies him to keep it ''now""" Deletion of Hal Parrish WP:ROUTINE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3981 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Safari Rally User:Unnamelessness 14:14, 31 May 2020 (UTC) keep Even if the subject fails , it might be able to receive an article as per . Not to mention the article actually passes the GNG Deletion of 2020 Safari Rally WP:GNG||WP:5P5 Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3982 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Return of the Killer Klowns from Outer Space in 3D User:NinjaRobotPirate 01:22, 2 November 2013 (UTC) delete """Like the nom says, there have been rumors and fevered hopes of a sequel for years now. They can be recounted in the main article under a """"Potential sequel"""" section. requires reliable sources to state the film has begun principle photography. Until then, it's just more rumors and speculation""" Deletion of Return of the Killer Klowns from Outer Space in 3D WP:NFF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3983 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leroy W. Stutz User:Peacemaker67 00:59, 11 October 2015 (UTC) delete no doubt a brave man, but doesn't appear to meet , and as a colonel without a fighting command with his awards, doesn't get close to Deletion of Leroy W. Stutz WP:GNG||WP:SOLDIER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3984 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Sillada User:JL 12:44, 2 September 2009 (UTC) comment """According to rtist, he must least developed new concept in the field where he excelled, in this case, he is a surrealist painter and he doesn't developed that idea. Yes, he have """"Menstrual Period in Political History"""", supposed to be an important media in history especially during Hello Garci scandal, but what about other painters that did the same and has the same ideas with him? The inline citations rarely distinguish him, or at least, the links never mentioned him, I do not know why this happened. Most links came from Multiply or privately-owned blog sites. ( According to Wikipedia:BLP#Self-published_sources|this rule, it is unwise to use blogs as external links ''or'' as citation. To paraphrase, blogs are solely interpretation of the concern and are subjected to bias; i.e., I can say on my blog that """"Sillada is the greatest born Filipino painter, greater than Amorsolo and others"""". That is extreme bias, especially that majority of blogs (esp. Multiply) tend to give opinions rather than the truth. ) To continue, it was also said that the artist's work(s) must """"...(a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention,..."""" In this case, the """"Menstrual Period"""" was the only mentioned work that gained critical analysis: and it was referenced to a website where it is very very difficult to confirm whether it was really said on that site. Furthermore, the article fails . Finally, Google search of his names will give us blog sites, Amazon/Twitter/Facebook and other links to social networking sites and there are no reliable news sources to confirm that Gloria Arroyo conferred him such an award. Sure that it is cited, but do we have any ways to confirm that? If that was published in a coffee table, sure that there is, at least, a news article from an online local newspaper saying that""" Deletion of Danny Sillada WP:A||WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Attribution 34 +3985 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SolidFire (2nd nomination) User:Mark 21:29, 16 November 2016 (UTC) keep There exists some reliable sources in the article and Northamerica1000 has pointed out multiple reliable sources with content that is clearly more than just regurgitated primary sources. With multiple RS, the topic has been shown to be notable per . Any promotional or non-neutrality issues can be better solved through editing, not deletion. Hence, keep Deletion of SolidFire (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3986 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Middlebrook User:Ohnoitsjamie 15:17, 24 April 2018 (UTC) delete Likely paid-promotion; not seeing how subject meets or . His consultancy group has been quoted in some BBC articles, but that's about it as far as third-party coverage Deletion of Peter Middlebrook WP:ACADEMIC||WP:GNG||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3987 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiona Stewart (event director) User:EmyRussell 13:18, 26 February 2018 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Fiona Stewart (event director) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3988 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primax 3 User:Mets501 17:45, 6 June 2006 (UTC) delete per &mdash Deletion of Primax 3 WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Spam 26 +3989 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beaver contest User:Mark 23:28, 21 January 2014 (UTC) delete as . This is a large computer and informatics contest for young folk. http://bebras.org/about/ It's claimed that over 500,000 students participated last year from 27 countries. It's listed as one of the http://www.ocg.at/en/competitions-children-and-young-people top three contests by the OCG, but I don't know if this is enough by itself for notability. For such a large contest, I've been unable to find multiple in-depth independent RS discussing it, but this could just be my incompetence at finding education-related RS. As it stand, this is a case of . If others find good RS, I'm happy to change my recommendation Deletion of Beaver contest WP:TOOSOON||WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +3990 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ignacio Govere Colliport (iBoy) User:Doc 16:01, 9 March 2008 (UTC) delete Absolutely no sources check out on him. No charts list him, nothing found on everyhit.com, All Music Guide or anywhere. In fact the only ghits for the artist is to http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Ignacio+Govere+Colliport%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a Wikipedia and mirror sites. If he hit #1 on the UK Singles Charts, I would've at least gotten something. And the fact the album went Gold in America? I've got nothing on that either. This is a |hoax Deletion of Ignacio Govere Colliport (iBoy) WP:HOAX Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes 40 +3991 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blatant Doom Trip User:doomsdayer520 14:45, 27 March 2018 (UTC) delete A tribute to a notable band featuring other notable bands, but the album itself has attracted little notice. It has a fairly substantial review at AllMusic and a mention at Consequence of Sound https://consequenceofsound.net/2010/10/guided-by-voices-tribute-album-features-flaming-lips-blitzen-trapper-thurston-moore/. Those might be enough for #1 but I consider that to be a bit of a stretch. Otherwise the album's only notice has been in a few fan blogs Deletion of Blatant Doom Trip WP:NALBUM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3992 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecco II: Sentinels of the Universe User:Randomran 22:00, 22 August 2008 (UTC) delete unverifiable, non-notable, Deletion of Ecco II: Sentinels of the Universe WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +3993 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pile-on User:Tarret 14:44, 24 December 2006 (UTC) delete as according to Deletion of Pile-on WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +3994 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoshihiro Homma Hisa User:Trebor 15:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC) delete unless sourced, would be nice for a linguist to take a look. From the brief description, it doesn't seem likely he'll pass Deletion of Yoshihiro Homma Hisa WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3995 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Global Surgical Consortium User:Dps04 12:35, 14 June 2016 (UTC) delete this article, at least in its current form, per Deletion of The Global Surgical Consortium WP:G11 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +3996 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Sting User:carterdriggs 18:19, 15 October 2007 (UTC) delete per nom and due to it not even being close to meeting Deletion of Team Sting WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +3997 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Move Closer to Your World User:SummerPhD 18:44, 27 May 2011 (UTC) comment """The """"obscure"""" book is from a professor at the Cronkite School at ASU. IMO, it is certainly a |reliable source""" Deletion of Move Closer to Your World WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3998 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southern Arizona Pride User:Bearian 21:24, 16 December 2013 (UTC) delete but only because it is too new and there are not yet |enough reliable sources with |significant coverage to make a decent |stub. I've done some on-line searches, and have |verified its existence and am satisfied that it is '''not''' fraudulent. I need to emphasize that recognition or non-recognition by the IRS is irrelevant to is veracity; DavidA373's ''ad hominem'' to the contrary borders on the intersection of homophobia and defamation. The I.R.S. allows many different types of non-profits, from 528s to the Elks Lodges, some of which are charities, but most are not. On the other hand, its Wikipedia:Existence ≠ Notability|verifiability doesn't make it notable Deletion of Southern Arizona Pride WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:STUB||WP:V Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +3999 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shivarama Varambally User:Trusilver 21:46, 20 October 2011 (UTC) delete He's just as notable as about 80% of the rest of the doctors in the world. Totally fails Deletion of Shivarama Varambally WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4000 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Russian military intervention in Ukraine User:My 17:40, 11 August 2014 (UTC) comment Person who started this AfD was identified as a |sockpuppet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Constance_Lahaye here. This entire discussion is a violation of rules. Please close Deletion of 2014 Russian military intervention in Ukraine WP:SOCK Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry 80 +4001 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serenism User:Peterkingiron 21:35, 21 September 2013 (UTC) delete I note that it is categorised as a Neologism: it obviously fails . With no sources, my guess is that it is also WO:OR Deletion of Serenism WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +4002 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of obligatory nude recreation sites User:Tarc 17:17, 15 July 2014 (UTC) delete Fails , as noted above. Also shades of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of gay bathhouse regulars|List of gay bathhouse regulars here, in that the Wikipedia is being used as a nudist recreation guidebook Deletion of List of obligatory nude recreation sites WP:LISTN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4003 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ohio River Bearcats User:DARTH 16:07, 2 February 2011 (UTC) delete per , non-notable. As per nom, seems that it also violates Deletion of Ohio River Bearcats WP:NSPORTS||WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4004 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FL-802nd AFJROTC User:Kinu 02:18, 1 May 2007 (UTC) delete per , individual JROTC units are, unless otherwise sourceable, non-notable outside of the scope of the parent organization and/or the school at which they are based. I believe there's precedent here, so if anyone can find some of the other AfDs for these, that would help Deletion of FL-802nd AFJROTC WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4005 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Althaus User:Phantomsteve 12:30, 11 October 2010 (UTC) delete I can find no |reliable |independent sources which would indicate that she meets the criteria for inclusion Deletion of Mary Althaus WP:RS||WP:IS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4006 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owen Aaronovitch User:Joe 02:54, 1 October 2009 (UTC) keep Passes Deletion of Owen Aaronovitch WP:ENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4007 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omer Nadeem User:JediLofty 15:19, 27 August 2008 (UTC) delete for failing and . The article is written in a very promotional way; I thought it was a but a quick Googling didn't find anything Deletion of Omer Nadeem WP:MUSIC||WP:BIO||WP:COPYVIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4008 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajan Kannattu User:Bearcat 18:08, 22 June 2015 (UTC) delete In its current form, this is a completely |unsourced article about a person whose only substantive claim of notability is as the leader of a ''splinter'' faction within a political party, with ''no'' evidence that he's actually held a notable office to satisfy , and ''no'' real substance to indicate why leading a splinter faction within a political party would get him over either Deletion of Rajan Kannattu WP:RS||WP:NPOL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4009 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emre Anuk User:Argyle 19:05, 30 November 2011 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Emre Anuk WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4010 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Cruise User:Trilliumz 23:17, 19 May 2011 (UTC) keep """Added citations to books, |, and copyedited for clarity, changing to the indefinite article """"a blue cruise,"""" to match the Dutch version. Discovered in the process of adding citations that this term appears to have literary origins which predate its use in the tourist industry. We could use |help from some Turkish speakers to |expand on its significance in literature""" Deletion of Blue Cruise WP:RS||WP:WORLDVIEW||WP:HASPOT Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4011 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Saunders User:CaSJer 21:00, 19 December 2012 (UTC) delete Fails because he only has two fights for top tier organizations. Being a former UFC fighter doesn't make him notable, notability is not inherited. When/if he passes the MMANOT guidelines, the article can be recreated Deletion of Chris Saunders WP:MMANOT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4012 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewish Israeli stone throwing User:Icewhiz 19:25, 16 May 2018 (UTC) delete With the exception of the last two sources (one of which is a rather primary travel warning) none of the sources discuss the topic. What we do have is multiple individual incidents strung together - in which an Israeli (or Palestinian pre 48) Jew threw a stone. As such, connection of the strung together incidents to a topic is . Settler violence is already covered in Israeli settler violence. I suspect Haredi violence may be notable standalone. Ethiopian-Israeli (essentially once incident) probably not. All the various sub sets are not discussed jointly in RS, and arise/occur in completely different circumstances. As such we fail GNG since the sources do not address the topic (of '''Jewish Israeli''' stone throwing Deletion of Jewish Israeli stone throwing WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4013 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Pérez II User:David 22:47, 7 April 2015 (UTC) delete Assistant professors are usually to pass and I can see no evidence that he is exceptional in this respect. The article says only that he has published some things and won student and emerging-academic awards, none of which is sufficient Deletion of David Pérez II WP:TOOSOON||WP:PROF Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +4014 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crowne Plaza Abu Dhabi Yas Island User:Bearian 22:56, 18 October 2016 (UTC) delete per above. Also, see and . We are not a free webhost for the for-profit Intercontinental hotel brand; ''we are a charity''. This is merely one of six hotels on a small resort island that is off the main tourist trails. I don't see how it's special or |notable in any way Deletion of Crowne Plaza Abu Dhabi Yas Island WP:NOTWEBHOST||WP:MILL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4015 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergei Aleksandrovich Andreyev User:Pharaoh 09:08, 16 August 2016 (UTC) keep passes ooty .Note Russian Second Division or Russian Professional Football League is a fully Professional league as per PL Deletion of Sergei Aleksandrovich Andreyev WP:F||WP:FPL Wikipedia:Non-free content 55 +4016 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daran Norris User:MichaelQSchmidt 09:07, 17 December 2010 (UTC) keep """Never a good idea to send to AFD simply due to or to force by others. Nominator made an unfortunate mis-statement when saying """"all voice acting credits are one-or-two-shot characters or additional voices"""". This is patently incorrect, and this individual meets through easily |verifiable http://books.google.com/books?as_brr=0&as_pub=-icon&q=%22Daran+Norris%22http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Daran+Norris%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&btnG=Search+Archives and quite lengthy careerhttp://www.imdb.com/name/nm0358460/filmoyear with numerous significant roles roles in multiple notable productions stretching from at least 1977 through 2010""" Deletion of Daran Norris WP:NOEFFORT||WP:CLEANUP||WP:ENT||WP:V Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +4017 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martynas Jasiūnas User:Papaursa 00:14, 7 March 2016 (UTC) delete """Does not meet the notability criteria for kickboxers or boxers. His boxing titles are all """"youth"""" or """"junior"""", so they fail to show notability. His success at IFMA events does not show notability because that is an amateur organization and amateur kickboxing is explicitly excluded from showing notability at . Since he is now only 18, it's also not clear whether or not the titles he did win were adult or junior""" Deletion of Martynas Jasiūnas WP:NKICK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4018 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of nude celebrities User:TonyBallioni 15:09, 10 November 2007 (UTC) delete """Can those claiming that this is notable please explain why they think it is so. As of now it looks like a clear example of and I am leaning towards delete but I am willing to """"vote"""" for keep if it can be explained why this is notable""" Deletion of List of nude celebrities WP:DIRECTORY Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4019 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social software in education User:Atmoz 00:13, 28 October 2008 (UTC) keep A well-written, well-sourced article. But please be aware of Deletion of Social software in education WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +4020 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cumberland County Schools User:GO 03:08, 1 September 2008 (UTC) keep School district articles are generally always considered notable. If the United States article needed clean up, then would we delete it? The answer is no, and the answer shouldn't be any different here; articles about notable subjects need to be kept and cleaned up. Close this per Deletion of Cumberland County Schools WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +4021 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bus routes in Gloucestershire User:Imzadi1979 01:04, 25 March 2013 (UTC) delete fails and . Lists like these should be transwikied to Wikivoyage rather than left on Wikipedia Deletion of List of bus routes in Gloucestershire WP:GNG||WP:NOTTRAVEL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4022 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akash Arora User:Monicasdude 15:23, 19 February 2006 (UTC) keep Meets criteria for published writers, also involved in noteworthy event http://64.233.179.104/search?q=cache:lqAjRXtGT-IJ:messages.indiainfo.com/ubb/Forum99/HTML/000230.html+%22Akash+Arora%22+times+hindustan&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=3&client=firefox-a Deletion of Akash Arora WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4023 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marion Kozak User:Quasihuman 02:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC) merge """after reviewing what sources I can find on the internet, the subject does not appear to pass , as the https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&tbm=bks&tbm=bks&q=inauthor:%22Marion+Kozak%22&sa=X&ei=WCwbUNKADuvuiQLu9IHgAw&ved=0CDkQ9Ag four publications does not appear to pass the third criteria of said guideline. Additionally subject does not appear to pass ; although the subject is mentioned multiple times in news sources, and mentions in books, none of them appear to meet ''Significant coverage''. One possible exception is http://www.telegraph.co.uk/family/7730052/The-miraculous-escape-of-Marion-Miliband.html this article in the Telegraph, however it can be argued that the """"piece together"""" nature of the article, as the article itself states, can mean it (the article) is more about the events around the subject and not the subject herself. All that being said, what content that can be |verified can be merged with the article & section Ralph Miliband#Personal life, as suggested by""" Deletion of Marion Kozak WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4024 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanga International School User:Edinburgh 22:29, 6 January 2012 (UTC) delete does not meet or current school guidelines Deletion of Tanga International School WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4025 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bluepill User:Verdatum 02:45, 30 January 2008 (UTC) delete Does not meet covered with . Seems like an attempt to start a Deletion of Bluepill WP:FICT||WP:PLOT||WP:NEO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4026 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of the 2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests User:Boud 02:02, 1 September 2019 (UTC) delete """but '''merge''' any notably new material. Following John M Wolfson's comments above, the original title """"Aggressive and abusive tactics used by the protesters in the 2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests"""" very much sounds like a of Tactics and methods surrounding the 2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests and ; whether the actions are """"aggressive"""" or """"abusive"""" forms of civil disobedience techniques used against unresponsive governments and police, in HK or elsewhere around the world, or whether they are really """"tactics"""" or not, or whether they are proportionate to the threat and urgency, are questions that go more into (at present) the """"Reactions"""" article - PRC policy aims to discredit 30% of HK's population as """"violent rioters"""". The tactics themselves (if they are tactics) make sense in the """"Tactics"""" article. ''(As mentioned at Talk:Tactics and methods surrounding the 2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests#Government tactics and methods, it might be worth it to off the PRC part of """"Reactions"""" into a """"PRC/HK governmental tactics ..."""" article, after choosing a reasonable name. The tactics of the PRC/HK governments in this context are a notable topic, no matter whether they are respectful of human rights and the international legal principle of self-determination or not""" Deletion of Criticism of the 2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests WP:POVFORK||WP:UNDUE||WP:SPLIT Wikipedia:Content forking 33 +4027 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsunami solutions User:CNMall41 05:45, 20 April 2019 (UTC) delete Fails . Not to be confused with https://www.courant.com/business/hc-main-street-tsunami-solutions-20160616-story.html this one. There's nothing that comes close to Deletion of Tsunami solutions WP:NCORP||WP:ORGCRIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4028 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cantus Musicus User:Yetisyny 11:25, 3 September 2018 (UTC) delete fails criteria for notability of musical groups Deletion of Cantus Musicus WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4029 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Duhart User:Cbl62 16:14, 30 September 2019 (UTC) delete Doesn't pass or . In terms of , the only significant coverage I can find is from the Newport News Daily Press, e.g., https://www.dailypress.com/sports/dp-spt-odu-duhart-20181005-story.html here and https://www.newspapers.com/clip/36540765/duhart/ here. GNG requires that such coverage exists in ''multiple'' independent sources. Accordingly, unless more is uncovered, this one does not make the cut. Will reconsider if significant coverage is found in other sources Deletion of Jonathan Duhart WP:NGRIDIRON||WP:NCOLLATH||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4030 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mythili Kumar User:Xxanthippe 05:07, 23 June 2009 (UTC) comment Would not pass high standard of W:Prof. May pass other Deletion of Mythili Kumar WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4031 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eternal Decision User:NawlinWiki 13:31, 27 January 2007 (UTC) delete fails , arguably speediable but probably better to settle it here Deletion of Eternal Decision WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4032 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/420 ska mosh core User:Shaundakulbara 18:40, 30 January 2007 (UTC) delete does not establish |notability through |verifiable sources Deletion of 420 ska mosh core WP:N||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4033 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Thy Neighbor: The Tory Diary of Prudence Emerson User:Starblind 03:09, 11 June 2008 (UTC) merge to Dear America. Notable series, but each individual one of the 40 or so volumes doesn't individually pass Deletion of Love Thy Neighbor: The Tory Diary of Prudence Emerson WP:BK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4034 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of enclosed roller coasters User:RoySmith 17:28, 24 August 2018 (UTC) delete Unsourced for nine years. No evidence that this is a real term. Don't merge; since this is unsourced, it fails , so can't be merged. In fact, the proposed target fails as well, for the same reason Deletion of List of enclosed roller coasters WP:V||WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4035 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Hardin [[User talk:204.126.132.231|talk]]) 16:05, 24 June 2014 (UTC) delete Fails and . Is not listed on the all American team at the AP's web sitehttp://collegefootball.ap.org/article/ap-all-america-team-list.Special:Contributions/204.126.132.231|204.126.132.231 Deletion of Greg Hardin WP:NGRIDIRON||WP:NCOLLATH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4036 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolutionary theory of the self User:Bearian 20:56, 25 November 2019 (UTC) delete per , hat tip to {{U|Headbomb}}. This is a sloppy mix of |original research and an op-ed. I'm |sure the creator and editors who wrote this meant well, but this is not even wrong Deletion of Evolutionary theory of the self WP:TNT||WP:OR||WP:AGF Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +4037 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elonka Dunin (3rd nomination) User:Shot 00:22, 5 November 2008 (UTC) delete if it weren't the fact that the person in question wasn't a high editcount admin, this would be a clear cut case of failure due to . However I can see that it's just going to be a personality vote unfortunately Deletion of Elonka Dunin (3rd nomination) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4038 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Reinhart User:David 04:25, 9 May 2019 (UTC) delete The only form of notability claimed in the article is academic, but |our standards for academic notability explicitly exclude student awards. Merely having written a few review papers is inadequate for notability; the papers need to be heavily cited, and here they appear not to be. And the supposed references for the article are merely more things the subject has written, not anything that can be used as a reference about the subject. Far |too soon Deletion of Christopher Reinhart WP:PROF||WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4039 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galaxy Technology User:Themfromspace 10:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC) delete Fails the |general notability guidelines. While mentions of the company pop up in the news and we can verify its existance, there is no batch of independant reliable third-party sources written about the company to establish its notabilty Deletion of Galaxy Technology WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4040 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiyoshi Shiina (2nd nomination) User:Mdtemp 19:20, 9 December 2014 (UTC) delete This article was speedily deleted last week. There's no reason why this article should keep being recreated when there's no new evidence of notability. Lots of passing mentions and articles on some of his students do not give him notability ( Deletion of Kiyoshi Shiina (2nd nomination) WP:NOTINHERITED Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +4041 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Hartl User:Fly 21:47, 28 June 2011 (UTC) delete """minus; The subject does not meet . This article has been written because of http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13906169 a single page on the BBC news website. He was not the subject of the article, he was simply interviewed for the article. The main notability criteria is that there is """"significant coverage"""" about the subject, which means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and not just interview his once or twice with regard to another issue. OT#NEWS|Wikipedia is not a newspaper. A single mention on a single news webpage does not qualify as significant coverage""" Deletion of Michael Hartl WP:ACADEMIC||WP:N||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4042 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoffrey Palmer (real estate developer) User:Pharaoh 03:29, 16 August 2016 (UTC) keep passes Deletion of Geoffrey Palmer (real estate developer) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4043 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit (series) User:Teancum 16:28, 16 July 2012 (UTC) delete WP:SPINOUT|Unnecessary article spinout. None of the images have rationale for these pages, and references/text are simply borrowed, meaning there's no real substance that doesn't already exist in either the series or individual game articles. It was a |Good faith creation, but is better suited for the http://nfs.wikia.com/wiki/Need_for_Speed_Wiki Need for Speed Wikia. The core series article (Need for Speed (series)) can easily be trimmed for length, too Deletion of Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit (series) WP:GOODFAITH Wikipedia:Assume good faith 53 +4044 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Sykes (singer) User:Armbrust 20:37, 18 September 2010 (UTC) delete per , no notability outside the band and it is a unlikely search term Deletion of Nathan Sykes (singer) WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4045 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolyn Banks User:Gidonb 01:20, 30 April 2019 (UTC) keep Meets both and . and also apply Deletion of Carolyn Banks WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG||WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:SNOWBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4046 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fighter X [[User Talk:Blaxthos|t]] / [[Special:Contributions/Blaxthos|c]] ) 20:34, 31 August 2008 (UTC) delete Fails and . / USER:Blaxthos|Blaxthos Deletion of Fighter X WP:MUSIC||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4047 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Middle Eastern Cold War User:Hawkeye7 22:35, 6 March 2017 (UTC) delete as Deletion of Middle Eastern Cold War WP:CFORK Wikipedia:Content forking 33 +4048 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanjib Ahsan Saad User:A 04:30, 4 May 2021 (UTC) delete Fails , and . Player has appeared in ICC Trophy but not in final. There are some passing mentions but not enough for him to pass GNG. The articles needs more reliable sources in significant coverage to pass GNG. &mdash Deletion of Tanjib Ahsan Saad WP:CRIN||WP:GNG||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4049 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloginity User:Jujutacular 17:15, 20 January 2011 (UTC) delete I have failed to find significant coverage of the company or website from |reliable sources. All of the coverage currently referenced in the article seems to only mention it in passing. It therefore fails the |general notability guidelines Deletion of Bloginity WP:RS||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4050 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gjertrud Fitje User:Mentoz86 20:22, 26 January 2012 (UTC) delete Only found http://www.firdatidend.no/nyhet.cfm?nyhetid=4022 this - doesn't pass Deletion of Gjertrud Fitje WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4051 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rime of the Ancient Mariner in popular culture User:TenPoundHammer 18:11, 26 October 2009 (UTC) delete per nom, don't even bother restarting from scratch, it's unsalvageable. No secondary sources, nothing more than . Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Many otters • :User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat Deletion of The Rime of the Ancient Mariner in popular culture WP:SYN Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4052 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jón Pauli Olsen User:Mattythewhite 21:23, 25 May 2012 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Jón Pauli Olsen WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4053 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobility Network Laboratory User:Reaper 20:04, 18 January 2011 (UTC) delete Fails the |general notability guideline Deletion of Mobility Network Laboratory WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4054 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyndal Eckersley User:Jayvdb 00:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC) delete http://www.faess.jcu.edu.au/soe/alumni.html real person however the article is full of wikt:claptrap|claptrap. Fails Deletion of Lyndal Eckersley WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4055 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taobao User:Qrsdogg 17:46, 13 July 2011 (UTC) keep The fact that a company closes (or is split) is really no reason to delete the article (). This article can cover the history of the company from 2003-2011 and the split versions (presuming they are notable) can cover 2011 on Deletion of Taobao WP:NTEMP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4056 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grey Party User:Bearian 01:58, 20 February 2009 (UTC) delete per all of the above and Deletion of Grey Party WP:FRINGE Wikipedia:Fringe theories 44 +4057 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gch government colleges hostel User:Schuym1 23:33, 6 January 2009 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Gch government colleges hostel WP:NOTABILITY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4058 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akil Kumarasamy User:Pburka 19:53, 30 May 2021 (UTC) keep Award winning Deletion of Akil Kumarasamy WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4059 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountain View Cur (2nd nomination) User:Eduemoni 03:47, 3 February 2013 (UTC) delete It seems that the article's main author is involved with and also article does not meet general notability guideline Deletion of Mountain View Cur (2nd nomination) WP:SPS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4060 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stéphanie Allard-Gomez User:Rpclod 05:30, 19 July 2014 (UTC) delete Does not appear to meet Deletion of Stéphanie Allard-Gomez WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4061 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SoftStack Factory User:Graywalls 05:01, 16 November 2019 (UTC) delete local business journals regularly write about new shops in town. That's why they're called.. ahem ''busienss'' journal. A local paper or newsletters don't satisfy |significant coverage criterion of |notability guidelines for organizations and companies Deletion of SoftStack Factory WP:SIGCOV||WP:NORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4062 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A V Denham User:NJ 00:35, 20 May 2012 (UTC) keep Denham has written at least nine published books which are available for purchase at amazon.com.http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_2?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=denham+%22robert+hale%22 Denham meets the notability standard: ''The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work Deletion of A V Denham WP:CREATIVE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4063 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Pearce (philosopher) (3rd nomination) User:Gjmulder 20:06, 9 January 2014 (UTC) comment """Given then that he doesn't meet - out of the 11 sources cited in the article: 3, 6 and 8 (the latter only available on archive.org) are links to David's own websites, 4 and 7 are from the website of an organisation David co-founded, and 10 is a disingenuous partial copy of 3, so all six are . explicitly states that """"primary sources do not contribute towards the notability of an article"""". There has been no progress at providing non-primary sources, despite repeated requests on the talk page over the span of a number of years""" Deletion of David Pearce (philosopher) (3rd nomination) WP:ACADEMIC||WP:BLPSPS||WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4064 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TiE Bhubaneswar User:Jethwarp 02:40, 7 September 2016 (UTC) delete as per and . Creator may add Bhubaneshwar branch info to TiE, if he wishes Deletion of TiE Bhubaneswar WP:NOTADVERTISING||WP:PROMO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4065 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HypnosNLP User:Trialsanderrors 21:54, 25 June 2006 (UTC) comment nice but where is the |outside verification? Fails Deletion of HypnosNLP WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4066 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Doran User:GiantSnowman 18:09, 25 January 2014 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Christopher Doran WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4067 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Paul McQueen and Craig Dean User:Flyer22 13:32, 2 August 2009 (UTC) keep Notability is clearly established within the article; the nominator even points this out. The article is not excessive plot summary, is not fanboy-ism, , or . Nor is most of this stuff in either of their individual articles. Their individual articles are what are mostly plot Deletion of John Paul McQueen and Craig Dean WP:FANCRUFT||WP:TRIVIA Wikipedia:Fancruft 61 +4068 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Dicks User:JoshuaZ 23:55, 15 October 2006 (UTC) keep Seems notable and the basic matters seem sourced. Unsourced problematic info should be subject to of course but that doesn't mean we shouldn't have an article. Furthermore, most of the unsourced comments (like being the nephew of Givens) is not a problem Deletion of James Dicks WP:LIVING||WP:LIVING Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +4069 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billy Quinncroft User:Fenix 11:26, 10 July 2017 (UTC) delete Fails |NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a |fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy |GNG Deletion of Billy Quinncroft WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4070 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suicide attacks in popular culture (2nd nomination) User:SlamDiego 10:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC) delete It's hard to judge the potential for such an article in the face of such a dreadfully poor realization, but it seems that it will always be awash in |“original research” and cannot transcend being a mere ''catalogue'' without even ''more'' |“original research Deletion of Suicide attacks in popular culture (2nd nomination) WP:OR||WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4071 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Ribacoff User:JPxG 05:12, 27 September 2020 (UTC) delete Holy moley -- of the nine references cited by this article, three are direct links to YouTube videos, one is a direct link to a Hulu video, one is a transcript of a talk show... the reference from the bar association is just an invitation to a golf event, one isn't in English, and the Connecticut Mag reference literally mentions him once in passing. The only remotely acceptable reference is the ABC News one, which quotes him on a few things, but none of the stuff in this article. I can't even fathom how an article could be written from just this source, let alone an article that would pass Deletion of Daniel Ribacoff WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4072 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Lloyd Smith (2nd nomination) User:Bearian 04:21, 21 February 2010 (UTC) delete absolutely zero |reliable sources, which are needed for |basic notability Deletion of Greg Lloyd Smith (2nd nomination) WP:RS||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4073 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp david GCC User:Esquivalience 00:31, 31 May 2015 (UTC) keep The summit meets and , has a wide geographical scope, and will probably lead to '''international''' agreements Deletion of Camp david GCC WP:GNG||WP:EVENTCRIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4074 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samraat Joshua Grewal User:Find 02:16, 9 January 2019 (UTC) delete per , no significant coverage in reliable independent sources. A position in an organisation does not make a person notable, especially when the organisation itself is not notable per . See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Youth (Australia)|Articles for deletion/Christian Youth (Australia Deletion of Samraat Joshua Grewal WP:NPOL||WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4075 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of breweries in Massachusetts User:Ellin 16:45, 21 January 2014 (UTC) keep These lists are valid for navigation. It is not hard to add links to them. It probably takes less time to go web hunting and add links than it does to set up deletion nominations for twelve lists. I updated parts of several of these lists including List of breweries in California. It was not hard and I learned that beer brewing is one of the largest non-durable industries in the U.S. and growing at a rate of up to 20% per year. Therefore I think the entire topic is relevant. I have worked on many lists in Wiki before and never encountered this sort of situation because does not demand citations on each line and states that a list may contain non-notable entries Deletion of List of breweries in Massachusetts WP:CSC Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists 51 +4076 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindon (Middle-earth) User:Devonian 04:29, 19 December 2019 (UTC) delete fails , as all references are primary. I could find no redirect target that both covers the subject and passes GNG Deletion of Lindon (Middle-earth) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4077 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy Thane User:Binksternet 17:56, 11 November 2020 (UTC) keep The cited ''Impose'' magazine source is very good, and in-depth sources can also be found in the https://www.villagevoice.com/2016/05/16/spectacles-grrrl-germs-film-series-captures-the-agony-ecstasy-and-diversity-of-riot-grrrl/ ''Village Voice'' and the https://wp.nyu.edu/specialcollections/2016/02/18/adding-context-the-lucy-thane-riot-grrrl-videos/ NYU Library Special Collections publication ''The Back Table'', to satisfy . Thane's work is cited by others, too many to list, which shows that she is important in her field. I think we have a good reason to host this information for our readers Deletion of Lucy Thane WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4078 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electronics circuit mini project on front door bell User:Tokyogirl79 21:01, 30 January 2012 (UTC) delete Wikipedia is not a how to manual. It's times like this that I wish that we had a special speedy category for the blatant articles Deletion of Electronics circuit mini project on front door bell WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4079 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Kostric User:Lithorien 19:11, 21 August 2009 (UTC) delete The article itself fails and really, the only notability that's offered up goes towards proving the '''event's''' notability, not the person's. Regardless of if more information will come out or not, this single person isn't likely to ever have signifigant notability. Just the event Deletion of William Kostric WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4080 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sally the Sunflower User:Gongshow 05:29, 24 August 2017 (UTC) delete The game exists but I could find no coverage in reliable sources; appears to fail Deletion of Sally the Sunflower WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4081 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Joy Flight crash User:Ram 16:00, 20 April 2016 (UTC) delete There are a ton of news references that covered these events, including national coverage (), but that's just not enough Deletion of 2009 Joy Flight crash WP:GEOSCOPE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4082 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barton Hawkins User:David 23:14, 22 November 2010 (UTC) delete I couldn't find any verification for his claimed biochemical advances, the idea of using the shareware model for creative content is not original to him, the citation record is not enough for , and what else is there Deletion of Barton Hawkins WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4083 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mario characters in other media User:Jakew 16:22, 17 May 2008 (UTC) delete Fails and , as it entirely lacks secondary sources (and sometimes even primary sources). Also, although the list may have defined inclusion criteria, there are a potentially infinite number of lists with defined inclusion criteria, and we have to consider whether the inclusion criteria are in fact meaningful and notable. In my view, this is merely a compilation of trivia. Hence, in my view, the page as a whole fails Deletion of List of Mario characters in other media WP:V||WP:PSTS||WP:INDISCRIMINATE Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4084 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Van Stevens User:Cullen328 07:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC) delete She served as mayor of a tiny town for a little over two years and all of the references are to the routine small town coverage of her was published in that tiny town's newspaper. All local papers write about their current mayors, and such a coverage is run of the mill. When she resigned, she disappeared from the historical record. There is no known coverage in regional newspapers, in magazines or in history books. If she is notable, then every mayor ever elected is notable and there is no consensus for that in or in the outcomes of deletion debates. This is taking inclusionism to an extreme that I cannot personally accept Deletion of Mary Van Stevens WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4085 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of English Word Suggestions User:Doc 19:57, 10 May 2008 (UTC) delete Per TenPoundHammer and . Wikipedia is not the place for you to list your personal snigets, #WEBSPACE|Wikipedia is not your webspace and is not a dictionary Deletion of List of English Word Suggestions WP:NFT||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +4086 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordin Sparks Second Album User:Flaming 21:27, 21 February 2009 (UTC) delete STOP → |Hammer Time Deletion of Jordin Sparks Second Album WP:HAMMER Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law 11 +4087 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Largest Air Forces User:Crum375 21:24, 23 May 2006 (UTC) delete per nom. plus ''ranking'' of fuzzy values is IMO Deletion of Largest Air Forces WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4088 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yannis's Law User:Mediavalia 10:35, 18 November 2014 (UTC) comment I've worked in the IT industry for 16 years and I've never heard of the so-called law or its author. It does smack a bit of |inherited notability by association to Moore's Law that everyone knows about. It is not a law, it's a hypothesis and one which the originator did not even test, so it's irrelevant. I still say delete Deletion of Yannis's Law WP:NOTINHERITED Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +4089 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Louisiana Baptist University people (second nomination) User:Sycthos 03:15, 18 January 2006 (UTC) merge """into Louisiana Baptist University. This article is vanity on its own, but the main article has an incomplete section on alumini. However, many sections, such as """"General alumni,"""" will be removed, as Wikipedia is a directory (""""indiscriminate collection of information""" Deletion of List of Louisiana Baptist University people (second nomination) WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4090 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veracity of statements by Donald Trump (2nd nomination) User:Wikiacc 01:40, 19 December 2019 (UTC) keep """Political"""" is fine; POV is not. Do you see a violation? If so, where? Anyhow, there's nothing stopping you from making """"Veracity of statements by other president"""" articles, as long as they're notable""" Deletion of Veracity of statements by Donald Trump (2nd nomination) WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +4091 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myth of Tito User:Calthinus 15:49, 11 August 2020 (UTC) comment """A bit unsure here. Unlike some others, I think this is a notable topic, clearly -- {{u|WEBDuB}} is right on this. ''However'', the current page is such a POV eyesore (see below) that it is just on the edge of . If the page is to be rescued, I would like to see substantial work in (a) reducing the egregious POV-in-wikivoice on the page, (b) improving the prose which will require a fair amount of work, and (c) dealing with other aspects of the myth of Tito in historiography and elsewhere, such as the spread of the myth to the West as Tito (much like Ceaucescu later with Reagan) managed to portray himself as somehow friendly to capitalistic states, and how this led to the coalescence of the myth of Tito as a man who successfully brought quarrelling peoples together in some paradise state (side note: and that was, at the time was, though now amusingly, used as a model for the proposed One state solution for Israel/Palestine -- not in scope, but this is an aspect of the notability of the myth I would argue -- though perhaps that is the whole Bratsvo Jedinstvo myth more than Tito himself). And, of course, the legacy of that myth, as the state he built fell apart after his death. For examples of the sort of prose that is totally unacceptable on Wikipedia for how POV it is, here is one (which I ''agree'' with, but geez, this is just so unprofessional): {{tquote|In this atmosphere of faultlessness many catastrophic political moves were drawn which slowly but inevitably pushed the all country and its Communist leaders into total catastrophe and disintegration.3 The mythologized Tito and dreamland Yugoslavia never existed.8 }} Also, this {{tquote|Danko Popović emphasized that for half of the century movies and books published in Yugoslavia were used to nurture myth of Tito and distort image of Chetniks.7}} -- Popovic is a """"writer and playwright"""" so he is not even remotely , and in light of that, regardless of intention, this sentence will look to almost any informed Western reader like it was inserted just to rehabilitate the Chetniks. Last example: {{tquote|The Myth of Tito was almost unanimously accepted and parroted by western scholars}} -- no citation, and, well... ahem""" Deletion of Myth of Tito WP:TNT||WP:DUE Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +4092 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Why is plastic surgery bad User:Mr 02:18, 19 April 2008 (UTC) delete A poorly written essay full of |original research and |POV. I think it might be |snowing Deletion of Why is plastic surgery bad WP:NOR||WP:NPOV||WP:SNOW Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4093 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mixed Company (Swarthmore College) (2nd nomination) User:BlueValour 02:52, 5 September 2006 (UTC) delete Merge is really a Keep since it allows the author to recreate). Fails Deletion of Mixed Company (Swarthmore College) (2nd nomination) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4094 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britt Marie Hermes User:Fieari 02:13, 15 June 2016 (UTC) keep """I honestly don't see it as promotional, or at least not """"too"""" promotional. Most of it seems simply stating what she is known for. If any rewriting is necessary, it would be very minor tweaking into more encyclopedic voice, not wholesale gutting of the article. Notability seems to be established, and besides, I am philosophically opposed to anyway""" Deletion of Britt Marie Hermes WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +4095 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gigaset Communications User:Usrnme 13:28, 9 January 2009 (UTC) delete """per Wikipedia:NOTADVERTISING#ADVERTISING|WikiNot:Advertising and . The previous IP contributor to this discussion mentions """"Company was established recently, so not enough time to be on major new sources."""" which is exactly the point of and """ Deletion of Gigaset Communications WP:N||WP:V||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4096 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glyda User:Fan 01:46, 15 July 2006 (UTC) comment Forget JPS. Let me repeat: JPS does not matter to the discussion. What matters is the criteria at . Read them and explain how Glyda meets those criteria. Because it sure doesn't look like it Deletion of Glyda WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4097 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Falen Bonsett User:Bearcat 16:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC) delete """Single-market radio personalities do not get an automatic inclusion freebie just because they exist; they get articles only if and when they can be sourced over for something of ''more'' than purely local significance. But of the four sources here, two are her own |self-published social networking profiles, one is a deadlink of an article about her being named one of the """"hottest"""" women in radio — as if physical appearance had ''anything'' to do with success in an ''audio-only'' medium! — in a non-notable other radio host's self-created and unscientific poll, and the last is a non-substantive blurb about her getting married. A person does not get an article the moment one or two reliable sources nominally verify that she ''exists''; she gets an article when reliable sources are ''substantively'' covering her in a ''context'' that constitutes a ''notability'' claim""" Deletion of Falen Bonsett WP:GNG||WP:SELFPUB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4098 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MikS User:onel5969 21:32, 25 December 2020 (UTC) delete not enough in-depth coverage to pass , and doesn't pass Deletion of MikS WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4099 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blossom, Bubbles and Buttercup User:Bilorv 15:29, 24 December 2018 (UTC) keep as the main characters in a very significant franchise (the Talk:The Powerpuff Girls|main article is mid-importance on WPTV, high on Animation), yes they are notable. In general, we need to be careful of but even the article's current sources show specific commentary on the characters themselves, not just the show as a whole. I think some commentors here need reminding that Wikipedia:Deletion is not cleanup|Deletion is not cleanup, and though we need some plot trimming and expansion of the Blossom,_Bubbles_and_Buttercup#Creation_and_conception|Creation and conception and Blossom,_Bubbles_and_Buttercup#Reception|Reception sections, the subjects are notable Deletion of Blossom, Bubbles and Buttercup WP:NOTINHERITED Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +4100 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Gasiorek User:Coredesat 19:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Joe Gasiorek WP:BIO||WP:VAIN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4101 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Lindquist (2nd nomination) User:Utopes 00:26, 27 October 2019 (UTC) delete per . The subject of the article, being a relatively unknown non-public figure, requests its deletion, so this request should be fulfilled Deletion of Mark Lindquist (2nd nomination) WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +4102 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mo Moulton User:Espresso 16:41, 10 January 2021 (UTC) keep Generally in practice requires at minimum two books which each receive at least one or two reviews, preferably from different sources. This is easily met here. I don't think the subject yet meets ; the academic book with CUP has healthy citations in Google Scholar (32) but there's nothing else yet. The creator of this and other articles is a relatively new editor who is picking, on the whole, notable topics but not always succeeding in demonstrating their significance in the way the 'pedia expects. It would be more positive to attempt to help out, rather than attempt to delete Deletion of Mo Moulton WP:AUTHOR||WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4103 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Degausser (song) User:Esradekan 00:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC) delete as a non-plausible search term. Fails notability per #Songs. No chart, no awards, no cover versions Deletion of Degausser (song) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4104 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angel Pantoja Medina (Standing Wake) User:Gene93k 02:44, 2 November 2008 (UTC) delete per #NEWS. This is a BIO1E with a single burst of news coverage at the event. Unusual but not notable Deletion of Angel Pantoja Medina (Standing Wake) WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4105 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valentine Ligny [[User talk:45.144.113.202|talk]]) 22:20, 28 August 2021 (UTC) keep Meets . Special:Contributions/45.144.113.202|45.144.113.202 Deletion of Valentine Ligny WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4106 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative metal (2nd nomination) User:Pmedema NONE keep I agree with Bretonbanquet - The topic to me seems of note. I'd like to see some more |reliable sources and some cleaning up of the article; maybe removing alot of the references to bands and relying on description instead Deletion of Alternative metal (2nd nomination) WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4107 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon School and Residential Treatment Center User:Adamant1 12:45, 26 June 2021 (UTC) delete As the nominator says, private schools (I have my questions as to if this place even counts as one) have to pass and this article clearly doesn't come anywhere close to meeting NORG. Receiving some awards definitely isn't enough to do it Deletion of Brandon School and Residential Treatment Center WP:NORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4108 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kleargear (2nd nomination) User:TJRC 00:23, 8 July 2014 (UTC) keep and '''rename'''. The company is not notable, but the case is. It's had substantial coverage beyond the threshold in http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-12-18/a-company-is-sued-over-its-no-bad-reviews-clause Business week, http://techcrunch.com/2013/11/18/kleargear-goes-into-social-media-lockdown-after-it-charges-customers-for-posting-bad-reviews/ Techdirt, and non-local news providers (for example, http://www.khou.com/news/KlearGear-fines-Texas-couple-35K-for-posting-negative-review-232421601.html Houston and http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/12/18/retailer-that-fined-couple-3500-for-negative-review-hit-with-lawsuit US News and World Report), as well as the source cited by SBaker43, above. Move to :Palmer v. Kleargear.com to make the article name conform to the topic and content Deletion of Kleargear (2nd nomination) WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4109 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Rothfuss User:Plasticup 13:02, 8 July 2008 (UTC) keep Google supplies http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&q=%22Chris+Rothfuss%22 plenty of notability. Not only does his http://www.greenriverstar.com/articles/2008/06/09/news/doc484d7a556a5b3457324290.txt local paper report on his candidacy, here he is in a http://www.examiner.com/a-1429274~Wyo__festival_to_offer_chances_to_dunk_a_Democrat.html national newspaper and in a http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2008%5C06%5C09%5Cstory_9-6-2008_pg9_11 Pakistani newspaper. He satisfies the basic criteria of : ''the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject Deletion of Chris Rothfuss WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4110 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Lonelygirl15 Episodes User:Wenli 03:21, 2 February 2008 (UTC) delete per . —  Deletion of List of Lonelygirl15 Episodes WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4111 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lifoti User:Coolabahapple 15:18, 27 December 2016 (UTC) delete """as this is and , have been unable to find any |useable sources, not averse to haveing a couple of lines about this magazine added to KJIVA|founders article. ps. being on Amazon and having an isbn does not make a publication notable. pps. this article did not get """"approved"""" (it did not go thru """ Deletion of Lifoti WP:PROMOTION||WP:TOOSOON||WP:RS||WP:AFC Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4112 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pitar Ason User:S 04:18, 14 January 2020 (UTC) keep References are added. The film is the first released film of Nipun Akter. The film is also selected for preservation in Bangladesh Film Archive. It passes Deletion of Pitar Ason WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4113 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shine Horovits User:Sam 08:04, 16 October 2018 (UTC) delete Sources to meet or / have not been found Deletion of Shine Horovits WP:NARTIST||WP:BASIC||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4114 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logiks (framework) user:czarkoff 11:41, 25 May 2014 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Logiks (framework) WP:B2B Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4115 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Tylman (5th nomination) User:Orlady 14:36, 12 September 2012 (UTC) delete An interesting little bit of long-ago genealogical research, but in the absence of published |Wikipedia-reliable sources to establish |notability and |verifiability, it doesn't belong in this encyclopedia Deletion of Richard Tylman (5th nomination) WP:RS||WP:N||WP:V Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4116 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bagra (caste) User:Spiderone 16:40, 24 July 2017 (UTC) delete no evidence of Deletion of Bagra (caste) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4117 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cocknubbing User:Part 14:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC) delete Fails . Just prod this kind of crap; don't even bother with afd Deletion of Cocknubbing WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +4118 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planets of the Hainish Cycle User:SportingFlyer 03:19, 18 November 2019 (UTC) delete fails . It's really difficult to perform a analysis on this, none of the keep !votes are helpful in explaining why secondary sources have discussed these enough to create a full article on them, but most of the citations are from the author talking about the universe she created. I have absolutely no idea how this can be considered encyclopaedic, and is probably best moved to an entirely different wiki Deletion of Planets of the Hainish Cycle WP:PLOT||WP:GNG Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4119 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Asian Friends User:ARUNEEK 11:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC) delete Fails .No notable sources to demonstarte for it's keep Deletion of South Asian Friends WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4120 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaming Realms User:HighKing 13:55, 28 May 2018 (UTC) delete Zero indications of notability, a run-of-the-mill company (with a marketing department) going about their business. Not a single one of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability. None are intellectually independent and they rely either on company announcements or quotations/interviews with company personnel. References fail and/or . Topic fails GNG and Deletion of Gaming Realms WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4121 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kylyn User:Devonian 05:29, 2 May 2020 (UTC) merge to Kazumi Watanabe per Doomsdayer. As there is no significant coverage of this album, just passing mentions, it fails Deletion of Kylyn WP:NALBUM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4122 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Directional Michigan (2nd nomination) User:Jayron32 14:27, 25 March 2010 (UTC) delete or possibly redirect to a term like Mid-major or Mid-American Conference. There is nothing here that can support an ''encyclopedia'' article. At best, we have a |dictionary definition with some sources that ''use the term''. The concept is not covered in depth by any sources, the words are used. There is a BIG difference between a term being ''used'' and a term being ''discussed indepth in reliable sources''. Where we have a Wikipedia article on a word or phrase, we need to demonstrate the latter condition. I don't see that here. The redirect to Mid-American Conference would actually probably work well, since the term ''may'' be a reasonable search term, and all three Directional Michigans are part of that conference Deletion of Directional Michigan (2nd nomination) WP:DICDEF Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +4123 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chailie Ho User:CaliforniaAliBaba 01:13, 7 August 2010 (UTC) delete per the lack of significant coverage in |reliable sources. I have reviewed Deletion of Chailie Ho WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4124 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spanish Galleon, Greenwich User:MarkZusab 13:44, 11 May 2020 (UTC) keep per Philafrenzy. The place meets Deletion of Spanish Galleon, Greenwich WP:GEOFEAT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4125 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Loren Agustin User:ApprenticeFan 00:42, 16 January 2016 (UTC) merge to Miss Universe 2002. No evidence of though failed to advance into the top 15 Deletion of Karen Loren Agustin WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4126 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Reyes User:Fenix 08:48, 13 October 2017 (UTC) delete Fails |NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a |fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy |GNG Deletion of Andy Reyes WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4127 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of motorcycle clubs (2nd nomination) User:Gene93k 10:34, 7 April 2008 (UTC) keep per . It appears to be an ordered developmental list that complements the category. A category cannot show red-links for missing encyclopedic entries, an important function. Notability of red-linked clubs should be better sourced, but the main problems with the list were fixed in the first AfD Deletion of List of motorcycle clubs (2nd nomination) WP:LIST Wikipedia:Lists 36 +4128 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gersi Xhuti User:Sir 01:27, 2 January 2011 (UTC) delete He's quite clearly not-notable. The Canadian Soccer League is not fully pro, and he has not received sufficient coverage to meet Deletion of Gersi Xhuti WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4129 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Barkow User:Wm335td 18:44, 9 January 2020 (UTC) delete a vanity page and possible for a person who created games that nobody ever played Deletion of Robert Barkow WP:PROMO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4130 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naomi Ginsberg User:PWilkinson 12:10, 8 March 2015 (UTC) comment The subject's h-index, according to GScholar, is indeed only 9, but GScholar also shows her as first-named author of two papers with citation counts of over 100 and (so far as I can judge) a g-index of at least 25 (a person's g-index is usually more than their h-index, but rarely by this kind of ratio). The main problem here seems to be that she has published a few papers with high citations but not much else. In some fields, these achievements would be quite enough to clearly meet #1 despite the low h-index - here, it might still be |TOOSOON but I would like to see further opinions Deletion of Naomi Ginsberg WP:PROF||WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4131 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Article (company) User:HighKing 15:00, 22 December 2017 (UTC) delete References fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails GNG and Deletion of Article (company) WP:ORGIND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4132 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concert Zap User:Metropolitan90 02:17, 10 January 2015 (UTC) delete I don't see any independent |reliable sources cited here Deletion of Concert Zap WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4133 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITunes version history User:Shoyrudude555 02:14, 24 September 2007 (UTC) delete Not encyclopedic. (Can you imagine looking this up in Brittanica?) While , borders on listcruft Deletion of ITunes version history WP:ITSUSEFUL Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +4134 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravi Puravankara User:Bri 17:58, 21 January 2019 (UTC) delete routine businessperson BIO; being the 94th wealthiest Indian (with access to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Itsmukeshhere|PR agents untroubled by ethics considerations?) does not qualify; |WP is not a list of wealthy people Deletion of Ravi Puravankara WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4135 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skippy List [[User talk:Skomorokh|Skomorokh]] 23:40, 19 June 2008 (UTC) comment Could you please elaborate on how you see applying to this case? Thank you Deletion of Skippy List WP:INDISCRIMINATE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4136 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Randles User:Whpq 17:01, 23 July 2013 (UTC) delete Game Inventor's Guidebook'' is a good source, but Boardgamegeeks is not a |reliable source. I don;t see any other significant coverage that would indicate that Wikipedia's inclusion criteria are met Deletion of Paul Randles WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4137 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gumb user:WarthogDemon 15:36, 10 October 2009 (UTC) delete Fails |being anything remotely interesting Deletion of Gumb WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4138 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/365 Days User:Sgeureka 13:57, 16 July 2012 (UTC) merge which also silences the ''keep because you can't delete merged content'' votes. So, this article fails #PLOT and doesn't establish otability. Plus per , this means there is absolutely no basis for a stand-alone episode article. &ndash Deletion of 365 Days WP:NOT||WP:N||WP:AVOIDSPLIT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4139 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of supporters of same-sex marriage in the United States User:Blanchardb 01:08, 3 June 2009 (UTC) delete Any list that can potentially contain easily over 1 million entries is ''definitely'' not wanted in Wikipedia. Also, --''' Blanchardb'''  Deletion of List of supporters of same-sex marriage in the United States WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +4140 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AIS Time User:Cnilep 13:33, 27 August 2009 (UTC) delete """as an unsourced |neologism. Furthermore the page currently consists of a |definition and a de-facto """"opular culture|In popular culture"""" section (the description of the television episode), neither of which is appropriate as the sole content of an article. (I suppose one could argue that the combination of the two is sufficient; I disagree.) Note, too, that the references suggested by MichaelQSchmidt are uses of the term ''ass-in-seat'', not uses or descriptions of ''AIS time""" Deletion of AIS Time WP:NEO||WP:DICDEF||WP:P Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +4141 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tobi Bakre (2nd nomination) User:Dflaw4 05:25, 7 May 2020 (UTC) keep I understand where the nominator is coming from, because, in terms of , it could be said that the article was created a little prematurely. But, that aside, there is an abundance of coverage on the subject in reliable sources (even if some of the articles appear a little frivolous in nature). There's enough to pass both and NACTOR, in my opinion Deletion of Tobi Bakre (2nd nomination) WP:NACTOR||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4142 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Lewis (Audio Engineer) User:Wikipedian2 15:53, 15 April 2011 (UTC) delete As per verifiability Deletion of Mark Lewis (Audio Engineer) WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +4143 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oliver Daemen User:Wehwalt 04:22, 1 August 2021 (UTC) keep Reasonably sure he satisfies Deletion of Oliver Daemen WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4144 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The House That Had Enough User:Geoffroi 00:21, 18 June 2019 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of The House That Had Enough WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4145 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Straight Community User:Last 10:07, 22 December 2005 (UTC) comment Chooserr created it, so it's fairer to say that it's a propaganda vehicle hijacked and turned into a dicdef. Half the reason to delete (apart from a dictionary) is that there's no point in people watching this page to make sure it's maintained as a dicdef and Chooserr doesn't revert it back to being a POV vehicle Deletion of Straight Community WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4146 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asian pride (3rd nomination) User:RightCowLeftCoast 01:07, 18 December 2012 (UTC) keep """the primary purpose of an AfD is to see whether the subject is notable. If we do a google search we can find more than https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Asian+Pride%22&aq=f&oq=%22Asian+Pride%22&aqs=chrome.0.57j0l3j62l2.2874&sugexp=chrome,mod=10&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#hl=en&safe=off&tbo=d&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Asian+Pride%22+-wikipedia&oq=%22Asian+Pride%22+-wikipedia&gs_l=serp.3...375906.378247.0.378349.11.11.0.0.0.0.219.1039.10j0j1.11.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1.h3GrX9Xi3tw&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&bvm=bv.1355534169,d.cGE&fp=4923ca7c4da5ccfb&bpcl=40096503&biw=912&bih=387 700k google hits, as well as over https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Asian+Pride%22&aq=f&oq=%22Asian+Pride%22&aqs=chrome.0.59j61j5j0j61l2.2717&sugexp=chrome,mod=10&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=%22Asian+Pride%22&hl=en&safe=off&tbo=d&source=lnms&tbm=bks&sa=X&ei=nrrPULrINIjoigKivoHQCQ&ved=0CA8Q_AUoAA&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&bvm=bv.1355534169,d.cGE&fp=27b39e0b5279bf6c&bpcl=40096503&biw=915&bih=674 1k mentions in books. Now to meet ''significant coverage'' per we can see the subject is covered under the chapter """"Got Rice?"""" in the book http://books.google.com/books?id=-0sEJ_0vV1QC&dq=%22Asian+Pride%22&source=gbs_navlinks_s Encyclopedia of Asian American Folklore and Folklife, Volume 1, the term is used to counter Asian American#Stereotypes|Asian American stereotypes in Greg Pak's http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6G4Q6VPbPsc ''Asian Pride Porn''http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0291025/ , as well as discussed elsewhere (http://books.google.com/books?id=dVUvp-XcLB8C&lpg=PA182&dq=%22Asian%20Pride%22&pg=PA181#v=onepage&q=%22Asian%20Pride%22&f=false 1, http://books.google.com/books?id=4hqpJEJp7cUC&lpg=PA54&dq=%22Asian%20Pride%22&pg=PA54#v=onepage&q=%22Asian%20Pride%22&f=false 2, http://books.google.com/books?id=lSltA45YAkQC&lpg=PA103&dq=%22Asian%20Pride%22&pg=PA103#v=onepage&q=%22Asian%20Pride%22&f=false 3). Moreover, it is also used outside of the United States, with usage in http://books.google.com/books?id=tujY4nUQdtkC&lpg=PA119&dq=%22Asian%20Pride%22&pg=PA115#v=onepage&q=%22Asian%20Pride%22&f=false Australia. Granted the article is in VAST need of improvement. However, that does not mean that it is not notable, and thus should be deleted. Rather it means, it should be tagged, and improved""" Deletion of Asian pride (3rd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4147 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States anti-government unrest User:LjL 00:08, 22 February 2016 (UTC) delete """as baseless of various loosely-related topics, some of which are plausibly not anti-government at all in the first place, but rather asking for """"more"""" government""" Deletion of United States anti-government unrest WP:SYNTH Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4148 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Denniss User:Otr500 11:05, 13 April 2017 (UTC) keep """I am going to look at this from a very narrow point of view, concerning , that include using historical books and considering Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features), Wikipedia:Geographic imbalance, and Wikipedia:Notability (geography), that will add to regional and state prominence, so giving notability to the author. Historical books are important to society, and we can't have a national history without the foundation of local history. 38 books, especially if not self-published, is more than trivial historical prominence, and if we don't consider this important we might as well get rid of all ocal|local places such as lighthouses or town historical interests. Because a reference is not """"listed"""" does not mean it does not exist. Regional coverage is acceptable as notability and one https://books.google.com/books?id=7bmgCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA283&dq=Bob+and+Doris+Bowman&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwipzs71waDTAhVG6YMKHQ_nA2YQ6AEIODAF#v=onepage&q=Bob%20and%20Doris%20Bowman&f=false book on Texas Rangers would be regional as well as state significance. I have found evidence that some of the books are listed at several libraries, not just in one county, so I am inclined to lean towards regional and state notability. The author wrote ''an encyclopedia'' of history that expands coverage to more than just a single town or even county before he died. '''Note''': http://www.ktre.com/story/22843249/angelina-co-historian-and-author-dies-at-77 Angelina Co. historian and author Bob Bowman dies at 77 With such regional and state notability an author with 38 historical books would be notable for Wikipedia inclusion. I do plan to look at the article, as well as sources, for article expansion as well as linking to other relevant articles""" Deletion of Gary Denniss WP:L||WP:policies and guidelines Wikipedia:Lists 36 +4149 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Altruism Society User:WikiDan61 19:52, 10 September 2014 (UTC) delete as a likely |hoax. Guidestar has no listing of any such organization, which indicates they have never filed a single federal non-profit tax return Deletion of The Altruism Society WP:HOAX Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes 40 +4150 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thengana User:TravisTX 00:54, 15 January 2008 (UTC) comment I spent 20-30 minutes researching this topic - I’m a bit of a map nut anyway - and the best I came up with is posted above. After another 15 minutes or so tonight, I found http://www.mapsofindia.com/maps/kerala/districts/kottayam.htm this map, which shows a place called ''Thanganal''. Google maps, however, has no entries for that name, and Google only turns up only two India-related hits. Between Google and several other searches, I still can’t find enough information to change my opinion. Maybe someone familiar with Southwestern India can shed some light on this. In the mean time, I’d like to suggest that you please |assume good faith on the part of the nominator. Regards Deletion of Thengana WP:AGF Wikipedia:Assume good faith 53 +4151 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bust of Bernardo O'Higgins (Houston) User:Another_Believer NONE merge as previously suggested, doesn't merit own article per . There is not much in the Houston Chronicle archives in the stories referenced by Deletion of Bust of Bernardo O'Higgins (Houston) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4152 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1988–89 Newport County A.F.C. season User:Brichcja 06:39, 8 September 2020 (UTC) keep multiple coverage from national sources, so meets Deletion of 1988–89 Newport County A.F.C. season WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4153 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sompong Chuenyindee User:Deathlibrarian 01:42, 27 February 2018 (UTC) delete Doesn't pass criteria for |NFOOTY Deletion of Sompong Chuenyindee WP:NFOOTY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4154 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sand Castles (film) User:Johnnylego88 20:25, 30 January 2015 (UTC) keep Like mentioned above, I managed to find quite of bit of articles and talk about the film and Sand Castles (film) has been edited with more notable and efficient sources since AfD started and is met. Also, since this discussion began, the film was announced alongside other notable films to be showcased in February at the 21st Sedona International Film Festival http://www.sedonafilmfestival.org/SIB/files/GRID%20-%20Official%2015.pdfhttp://www.sedonafilmfestival.org/Page.asp?NavID=162. Though a film's trailer popularity doesn't say if a film is notable or not, I think it is worth mentioning that the film's trailer was recently released and has tens of thousands of views already on one of many channels.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ywmnst3zGgl Deletion of Sand Castles (film) WP:NF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4155 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chester Doles User:Rpclod 22:38, 19 July 2014 (UTC) delete I agree with Huon. Further, neither element of is met Deletion of Chester Doles WP:PERP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4156 """Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas """"DeCoY"""" Case""" User:Carlosguitar 04:04, 4 August 2007 (UTC) delete fails """Deletion of Nicholas """"DeCoY"""" Case""" WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4157 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On the Wave Productions User:Warrah 14:18, 19 December 2009 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of On the Wave Productions WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4158 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shataramarie User:Piotrus 03:36, 10 November 2016 (UTC) comment The problem with this is that it may meet . Or may not. Checking whether the albums are on the rankings or such is time consuming, and I don't know how to do it quickly, which is why I don't usually even comment on MUSIC and SPORT related deletion requests. Ít would be much easier if the nom has explained that they had considered NMUSIC criteria and confirm that the subject is failing them. As the nom is written, it is just complaining about , and that does not mean that the subject is not notable. Unreliable sources do not merit deletion. Ping me if there are new arguments Deletion of Shataramarie WP:NMUSIC||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4159 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayor of Englewood, New Jersey [[User talk:Lambiam|Lambiam]] 17:27, 20 October 2011 (UTC) keep We have articles Mayor of Ashland, Kentucky, Mayor of Boonton, New Jersey, Mayor of Charlotte, North Carolina, ... . I know |OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not supposed to be an argument, but there is nothing making the office of Mayor of Englewood, New Jersey, any less notable than these other mayorships. So should all these articles be deleted? If you look at the Mayors of Englewood we have articles on, you'll see that their main claim to fame is ... having been the Mayor of Englewood! I'd say, if holding an office makes one notable, then the office is notable.   Deletion of Mayor of Englewood, New Jersey WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +4160 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven Deadly Enemies of Man NONE NONE keep Significant coverage per . The article should be worked on (or discussed in a section at Seven Deadly Sins or somewhere else), per , , and Deletion of Seven Deadly Enemies of Man WP:GNG||WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE||WP:NOEFFORT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4161 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Smith (health spa expert) User:AmericanAgent 09:56, 12 March 2019 (UTC) delete People are presumed |notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable which clearly fails in this case . Hence delete this article Deletion of Mark Smith (health spa expert) WP:BASIC||WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4162 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Larsson User:Rebbing 14:05, 16 March 2016 (UTC) comment The specific notability guideline for motorsports is . I don't have time to look into it properly, but a cursory look suggests that the subject doesn't meet either that specific guideline or the more general notability guidelines Deletion of Simon Larsson WP:NMOTORSPORT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4163 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rantahryu User:Accounting4Taste 18:59, 25 September 2007 (UTC) delete Doesn't meet otability and I can't find much in the way of third-party coverage, except of the methods of which this is an offshoot of an offshoot. I can't see a way to shoehorn this in as a sentence in Tang Soo Do, for instance; best left uncovered, I suggest Deletion of Rantahryu WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4164 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Náttfari User:הסרפד 23:09, 13 June 2014 (UTC) keep while the nominator isn't merely asking that the article be cleaned up, but is actually doubting its authenticity, applies; the legend of Náttfari appears in hundreds of source after one Google search (for an accessible source, see this http://books.google.com/books?id=I1ugAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA255 1911 book Deletion of Náttfari WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +4165 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clackamas Town Center Shooting [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 01:29, 12 December 2012 (UTC) comment Do these sorts of events ever ''not'' result in Wikipedia articles? may apply Deletion of Clackamas Town Center Shooting WP:RAPID Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4166 """Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of """"Occupy"""" protest locations""" User:benlisquare 05:03, 19 October 2011 (UTC) delete At its current state it is not an encyclopedic page. A loose list that will never be complete; also, what is the criteria for inclusion? Is a 7-man protest in Ayr, Queensland (population 8,000) to be included as well? The page does not state what the criteria for listing is, meaning that anyone can make non-|notable additions, with an link attached """Deletion of List of """"Occupy"""" protest locations""" WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4167 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AMX-104 R-Jarja User:Angusmclellan 20:41, 9 January 2007 (UTC) delete per Edison, Proto, Sandstein, Moreschi. , and refer. Apparently the well-intentioned editors who wrote wasted their time. Transwiki if anyone wants it Deletion of AMX-104 R-Jarja WP:V||WP:N||WP:INN||WP:WAF Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4168 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rayshaun Deese User:Rms125a 07:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC) delete as non-notable |actor Deletion of Rayshaun Deese WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4169 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuba Akpom User:Sir 23:02, 4 April 2013 (UTC) delete per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails and Deletion of Chuba Akpom WP:NSPORT||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4170 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The World Factbook list of developed countries User:Bearian 18:29, 22 April 2019 (UTC) delete per . This is a mere restatement of what's in a publically available source, now long out of date Deletion of The World Factbook list of developed countries WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4171 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Washiqur Rahman Babu User:Masem 23:57, 30 March 2015 (UTC) delete or consider an article about the attacks against progressives in Bangladesh which would include other related problems lke Avijit Roy. By itself, despite the wide coverage, this is a failure of and considering the event standalone, fails . But there is clearly a larger problem with stuff like this happening in that country, and so it fully makes sense to have an article about it that would also include this person's murder Deletion of Washiqur Rahman Babu WP:BLP1E||WP:NEVENT Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +4172 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick Butterfield (2nd nomination) User:K 06:08, 22 October 2016 (UTC) merge after delete) to List_of_British_supercentenarians#Chronological_list_of_the_oldest_living_person_in_the_United_Kingdom_since_1963 where the subject is already discussed. Not enough source material to build a balanced article and thus this falls under Deletion of Frederick Butterfield (2nd nomination) WP:WHYN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4173 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond A. Watson (2nd nomination) user:Lionelt 00:12, 2 October 2011 (UTC) keep The time this article was in ikiProject Conservatism/Incubator was time well spent. Thanks to George's patience and diligence the article is fully referenced with independent reliable sources and flies past WP:BASIC. &ndash Deletion of Raymond A. Watson (2nd nomination) WP:W Help:Watchlist 57 +4174 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AryoGen NONE NONE keep spaced ndash}} Meets per Deletion of AryoGen WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4175 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the best positions of Spain in the Olympic Summer events User:KartikeyaS343 16:55, 12 March 2020 (UTC) delete per Deletion of List of the best positions of Spain in the Olympic Summer events WP:LISTN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4176 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenichi Osada User:David 06:14, 27 April 2019 (UTC) keep Despite the unusually stubby state of the article it already documents a clear pass of Deletion of Kenichi Osada WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4177 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malini Subramaniam User:Topcipher 08:00, 17 April 2017 (UTC) keep per ; subject meets criteria 1 - ''''The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors''''. Besides https://www.cpj.org/awards/2016/malini-subramaniam-india.php the award, another major event that has received significant coverage in the media about the subject - is being threatened for her works, harassed - so much so that she had to leave her hometown, as covered in -1. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/committee-to-protect-journalists/journalists-in-india-thre_b_9377444.html Huffington post2. https://thewire.in/22100/activists-allege-state-persecution-for-flagging-human-rights-violations-in-chhattisgarh/ The Wire3. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/raipur/Chhattisgarh-journo-Malini-Subramaniam-forced-to-pack-up-quit-Bastar/articleshow/51059878.cms Time of India4. http://www.news18.com/news/india/human-rights-activists-demand-restoration-of-law-and-order-in-bastar-1343380.html News18and so on...many of which are major independent daily newspapers, news channels in India which sufficiently passes notability for more than single event ()i.e. award winning) per Also, there are sources that talk about the subject too (about their notability, claiming significance); example -1. http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/entertainment-others/covering-conflict-nupur-basu-women-journalists-in-conflict-zones-velvet-revolution-4551591/ Indian Express2. http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/gurinder-chadha-viceroys-house-huma-qureshi-partition-india-uk-pakistan/1/889373.html India Todayetc Deletion of Malini Subramaniam WP:JOURNALIST||WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4178 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wombat Carnival User:Grandmasterka 02:29, 31 May 2006 (UTC) delete Immense |peacockery, doesn't seem to fit Deletion of Wombat Carnival WP:PEACOCK||WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +4179 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cat Palmer (artist) User:Freshacconci 13:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC) comment Just to be clear: which part of does she satisfy Deletion of Cat Palmer (artist) WP:ARTIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4180 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of diplomatic missions in Hanoi User:Aaronw 22:27, 8 August 2008 (UTC) delete Wikipedia is a yellow pages or directory Deletion of List of diplomatic missions in Hanoi WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4181 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Pierce User:Catchpole 07:57, 6 November 2006 (UTC) keep Spiritualized clearly meet , Ladies And Gentlemen We Are Floating In Space makes frequent appearances in greatest albums lists Deletion of Jason Pierce WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4182 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Mamatas [[User talk:12.71.54.226|talk]]) — [[Special:Contributions/12.74.54.226|12.74.54.226]] ([[User talk:12.74.54.226|talk]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. 19:59, 3 May 2011 (UTC) comment Meeting one or more criterion does not guarantee inclusion, but it's rather silly to first argue that the awards are regional, and then when that is refuted argue that mere nominations don't count, and when that is refuted change your argument a third time without changing your opinion. Clearly, the reasons you put up for deletion originally simply aren't true-the awards are not regional, the publications are notable, and there are reliable third-party notes, including NPR. (It's also worth noting that the NPR material does not show Mamatas in a good light, which suggests that COI isn't a major issue with this entry either.) —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/12.71.54.226|12.71.54.226 Deletion of Nick Mamatas WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4183 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Labbayk (2nd nomination) User:Mhhossein 17:12, 12 October 2018 (UTC) keep Per #4. The group has performed some international concert tours Deletion of Labbayk (2nd nomination) WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4184 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turkic ideograms User:Voceditenore 09:05, 2 July 2011 (UTC) delete per BabelStone. This article was essentially created http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Turkic_ideograms&oldid=437033555 here as a |coatrack for the slew of other articles by the same editor relating to his dubious fringe research (and movement). Of the original 9 created, 5 have already been deleted via AfD. In addition to this one, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Hungary&oldid=437366194#Hungary 3 others are currently at AfD Deletion of Turkic ideograms WP:COAT Wikipedia:Coatrack articles 47 +4185 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starpoint Gemini user:H3llkn0wz 18:40, 26 August 2011 (UTC) keep Secondary sources are in the article, fully satisfies . Developer's notability is irrelevant per . —   Deletion of Starpoint Gemini WP:GNG||WP:NOTINHERITED Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4186 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Christie User:Osomec 08:33, 3 June 2006 (UTC) keep Easily and indisputably meets the criteria for sportspeople. Calvin Peete is one of just over a hundred red links out of over 900 names on list of golfers and at the current rate of progress they will all have articles in a month or two Deletion of Michael Christie WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4187 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Marvel Comics endearments User:J 05:42, 23 March 2007 (UTC) delete """I can see how this has some value. But that value is geared more towards an encyclopedia covering either comic books or marvel specifically. In a general use encyclopedia it seems out of place. Also, looking at the guide lines for the creator articles () and character article () it seems the inclusion of """"nicknames"""" is frowned on in those places. Since that is where you would normally expect to find this stuff, this list begins to look very out of place. (''Note:'' the character nicknames were not limited to use in the editorial texts, they permeate the scripted dialogues through out the comics in question. I'm surprised that Hulk's terms for other characters didn't make the list""" Deletion of List of Marvel Comics endearments WP:BIO||WP:CMC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4188 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The longest suicide note in history User:Edison 05:09, 5 March 2010 (UTC) comment """I really do not want to have an article about every epithet uttered by a politician, especially if it extends to Dick Cheney (http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,557670,00.html """"Go fuck yourself!"""") and George W. Bushhttp://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/04/weekinreview/jan-28-feb-3-keeping-an-ear-on-bush.html """"They misunderestimated me."""" These phrases got lots of press coverage, but do not deserve articles any more than the present article.Instead, individual epithets or catchphrases are redirected to an article about the speaker, or about the speech, or to the article which has a collection of such catchphrases, List of political catch phrases. This is Wikipedia, an encyclopedia, |not Bartlett's Familiar Quotations""" Deletion of The longest suicide note in history WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4189 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Uchitel User:Rdm2376 21:52, 6 December 2009 (UTC) delete or redirect per . Were it not for the Woods connection, what is left would be a clear case of non-notability. A couple of mentions over several years does not add up to anything approaching notability Deletion of Rachel Uchitel WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +4190 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DigitalThink NONE NONE keep """spaced ndash}}Per a plethora of significant coverage in reliable sources. Per , """"Notability is not temporary: once a topic has been the subject of """"significant coverage"""" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage""" Deletion of DigitalThink WP:NTEMP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4191 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Poole User:PMDrive1061 17:07, 27 June 2009 (UTC) delete and invoking both and as a hoax both here and on that phony blog. Blocking the user as well. This individual has already wasted enough valuable volunteer time with this nonsense Deletion of Stephanie Poole WP:BOLD||WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Be bold 78 +4192 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabrina Ho Chiu-yeng User:Dps04 05:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC) keep There is a decent amount of substantial coverage of the subject in English and Chinese-language sources. Examples include: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/2189356/stanley-hos-daughter-sabrina-reveals-she-will-marry-harvard South China Morning Post, https://www.hk01.com/%E7%9F%A5%E6%80%A7%E5%A5%B3%E7%94%9F/512925/%E4%BD%95%E8%B6%85%E6%AC%A3-%E5%8D%83%E5%84%84%E5%A5%B3%E5%9C%98-%E5%90%84%E6%9C%89%E4%BE%86%E9%A0%AD-%E4%BD%95%E8%B6%85%E8%93%AE-%E4%BD%95%E8%B6%85%E7%9B%88%E9%96%A8%E5%AF%86%E5%9C%98%E6%9C%89%E7%BE%A9%E6%B0%A3%E9%9B%B6%E6%9E%B6%E5%AD%90 HK01, https://www.scmp.com/magazines/post-magazine/arts-music/article/2122384/unesco-partner-sabrina-ho-artfully-dabbles SCMP (again), https://www.straitstimes.com/lifestyle/entertainment/tycoon-stanley-hos-youngest-son-buys-hk500-million-home The Strait Times, to name a few. Enough coverage to pass and Deletion of Sabrina Ho Chiu-yeng WP:GNG||WP:NBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4193 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexual Morality and the Law (2nd nomination) User:Hocus00 04:18, 6 June 2021 (UTC) keep Nominator's reasoning seems to be mostly . Foucalt is a renowned philosopher, and although some of his ideas may be disagreeable or perhaps reprehensible, they should be covered on Wikipedia if it satisfies . Here, this interview was broadcast on radio, published in books and part of public debate in the 70's. Foucalt was an important figure, and this is a noteworthy topic. Definitely enough to satisfy Deletion of Sexual Morality and the Law (2nd nomination) WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:GNG||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +4194 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manspreading User:Bearian 00:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC) keep per - many reliable newspapers and magazines have had articles on the ''phenomenon'', not the word itself. Wikipedia has |many odd articles Deletion of Manspreading WP:BEFORE||WP:ODD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +4195 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1893 De La Salle Institute football team User:SportingFlyer 04:17, 23 May 2020 (UTC) delete the season itself isn't notable, just a couple routine game blurbs, no . Just because a team played Notre Dame doesn't make their season notable. If there's a requisite Notre Dame season article some of the information can be moved there, or to any De La Salle article we might have Deletion of 1893 De La Salle Institute football team WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4196 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little House with an Orange Roof User:Collectonian 06:32, 22 September 2009 (UTC) delete fails and . Just not notable Deletion of Little House with an Orange Roof WP:BK||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4197 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jude Rawlins User:Dhartung 09:02, 23 December 2006 (UTC) delete The nomination makes a nonstandard argument against notability. But the article lacks reliable sources -- this and Subterraneans (band) are both largely sourced from a self-published autobiography by Rawlins. There is an intriguing magazine profile, but by itself this apepars to fail Deletion of Jude Rawlins WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4198 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Moriarty User:CASSIOPEIA 10:40, 21 June 2018 (UTC) delete Local politician needs significant press coverage nationally or internationally to pass and it is not showing here Deletion of Patrick Moriarty WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4199 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R G C Levens User:Bwithh 05:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC) delete Failure of and failure to assert substantive encyclopedic notability (even stubs should do this). The only insubstantive attempt made is the claim that he ''edited'' a classroom version of a speech or speeches by Cicero. A search of the http://library.ox.ac.uk Oxford library catalog turns up only the two books mentioned in the article plus a brief Greek translation of a Shakespeare scene he did as a student to win a student prize. Google Books (Oxford University Library is one of the 9 library partners of this project) returns 37 hits but no books by him. Of the 37 hits (some of them are inaccessible), I can only find one which is more than a passing mention or footnotehttp://books.google.com/books?q=%22r+g+c+levens%22&lr=&sa=N&start=0 (no hits for his full name Deletion of R G C Levens WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4200 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional Romans User:Postdlf 15:53, 11 July 2010 (UTC) keep """at least for now, but discuss serious cleanup and pruning concerns. I don't understand at all the claim that this is an """"unencyclopedic cross-categorization""""; those are just words—naked assertion of opinion—until someone substantively explains why the very concept of the list is somehow invalid. I see nothing in any of the acronyms invoked (, , ) that would compel or counsel the deletion of this list. The topic seems straightforward and simple enough, and there certainly is no shortage of notable examples. So the only real concern I can identify here is a meaningful threshold for what fictional Romans should be included. The list at present includes, for example, unseen """"characters"""" from ''Monty Python's Life of Brian'' who exist only for the purpose of joke names. There's also an issue of how to deal with ''fictionalized'' characters, where perhaps nothing more than a name or basic historical role is kept but the rest is pure invention (cf. Titus Pullo & Lucius Vorenus in the HBO ''Rome'' TV series). Maybe the only practical way to organize this content is indirectly, through Fiction set in the Roman empire, if this list cannot exist without blowing up to every name mentioned in any work of fiction set in Ancient Rome. But I'd like to see that discussion before coming to that conclusion rather than just a diarrhea of acronyms""" Deletion of List of fictional Romans WP:SALAT||WP:NOTDIR||WP:IINFO Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists 51 +4201 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mattia Destro User:Nfitz 03:10, 17 July 2009 (UTC) keep Easily meets (which trumps with articles in many countries about him such as http://www.internazionale.fr/article-3259-destro-ce-debut-avec-l-equipe-est-deja-un-reve-pour-moi.html, http://www.puntosport.net/pageview2.php?i=17787&sl=1, http://www.calciomercato.com/index.php?c=23&a=129743, http://www.tuttomercatoweb.com/inter/?action=read&idnotizia=5175, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1029706/QPR-believes-Inter-Milan-youngster-Destro-right-man.html Deletion of Mattia Destro WP:N||WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4202 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Envy Theory User:Nuujinn 21:26, 15 June 2010 (UTC) delete but let's not |bite the user Deletion of Envy Theory WP:BITE Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers 56 +4203 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Living Death (film) User:MichaelQSchmidt 04:25, 12 September 2009 (UTC) keep per improvements made since the AfD began. And per request input from Korean Wikipedians in searching through the 3 million google hits http://www.google.com/search?q=%EB%B6%88%EC%8B%A0%EC%A7%80%EC%98%A5&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7DVXA, the 1100 news hits http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%EB%B6%88%EC%8B%A0%EC%A7%80%EC%98%A5&cf=all, and the 98 book hits http://books.google.com/books?q=%EB%B6%88%EC%8B%A0%EC%A7%80%EC%98%A5&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7DVXA&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wp. And before anybody squawks about my just providing g-hits... I do not myself read Korean, but a film that set box office records in South Korea is notable enough foir me, and common sense would seem to indicate that even if a small percentage of those g-hits is about this film, that small percenntage would be plenty Deletion of Living Death (film) WP:CSB Wikipedia:Systemic bias 83 +4204 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Moseby (2nd nomination) User:Jontesta 15:11, 22 August 2020 (UTC) delete after a review of the sources. There are some questoins of whether Mr. Moseby is a racial stereotype, but nothing enough to establish the of the character, and really more about racial representation in children's programming as a whole. In the sources he's cited as a brief example in a much wider conversation about representation, when we really need more to explain this character's real world reception overall Deletion of Mr. Moseby (2nd nomination) WP:NOTABILITY||WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4205 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellwood Walter (businessman) User:Lightburst 22:12, 20 July 2020 (UTC) keep I am adding newspaper articles to the article, there are many I added a Wisconsin newspaper (1862), and his obituary from the Philadelphia Inquirer (1877). Notable businessman who passes I will continue Deletion of Ellwood Walter (businessman) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4206 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasmin Čampara User:J 19:42, 2 April 2011 (UTC) delete fails and . Recreate the article if he does go on to play at professional/international level in future Deletion of Jasmin Čampara WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4207 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayor of South Campus User:Bad 06:41, 1 February 2006 (UTC) delete cute, but Deletion of Mayor of South Campus WP:NFT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +4208 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IDAMS User:Sovereign 12:07, 10 September 2015 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of IDAMS WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4209 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Praça TV User:Sander 20:40, 18 December 2016 (UTC) comment When starting a AfD with guessing, you should have started a discussion (on the talk page) first. Please read Deletion of Praça TV WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +4210 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unpowered aircraft User:Atmoz 21:56, 15 January 2009 (UTC) keep The Unpowered aircraft article is older than the Glider article. If anything, the Glider article is the . The two should probably be merged, but that's not an AfD issue Deletion of Unpowered aircraft WP:CFORK Wikipedia:Content forking 33 +4211 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Total Drama Reloaded User:David 15:22, 16 April 2010 (UTC) merge with the series. Total Drama, right? If it's not out yet, isn't this a violation of Deletion of Total Drama Reloaded WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4212 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corrina Broz User:TheGracefulSlick 18:47, 29 July 2017 (UTC) keep I should have considered editors wouldn't read the disclaimer in where it notes teams/team members are discounted Deletion of Corrina Broz WP:NOLYMPICS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4213 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wired (Hugh Cornwell album) User:BlueThird 00:04, 1 June 2011 (UTC) comment It might not be strictly appropriate to |bundle this with other Cornwell albums that are being considered for deletion, but they should surely be considered together and within the wider context of Cornwell's notability. There's an earlier AfD for Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Beyond_Elysian_Fields_(2nd_nomination)|Beyond Elysian Fields Deletion of Wired (Hugh Cornwell album) WP:BUNDLE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +4214 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007/08 Premier League Results User:Rackabello 17:49, 21 July 2007 (UTC) delete Very |crufty and |Wikipedia is not a sports almanac Deletion of 2007/08 Premier League Results WP:LISTCRUFT||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Listcruft 66 +4215 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rome Rule User:Aatomic1 16:13, 11 April 2008 (UTC) keep Passes with significant coverage from |reliable sources Deletion of Rome Rule WP:N||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4216 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seripa (Dragon Ball Z) User:Quasirandom 14:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC) merge to List of Saiyans in Dragon Ball, where she is already listed, per the suggestion of and the growing concensus that lists are the best way to handle fictional elements of subjects that grow too large for our britches, er, size constraints Deletion of Seripa (Dragon Ball Z) WP:FICT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4217 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malcolm Hall (fashion designer) User:Chiswick NONE keep the http://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O163738/theatre-costume/ '''Victoria & Albert Museum''' link in the article decisively proves Notability - the museum, which is Britain's primary museum of fashion and design, only collects what it believes best represents the finest and most notable designers of each generation. Malcolm Hall has created not just the costume shown at the V&A for Jimmy Page of Led Zeppelin, but for many other rock stars and celebrities including royalty - Princess Diana. But I agree that some of the article's other references could have been better chosen - remember it was written by a newbie ewbie|Don't Bite The Newbies. I thought the article so obviously noteworthy even as newbie-drafted that I didn't bother looking for more sources... maybe I have to do that now Deletion of Malcolm Hall (fashion designer) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4218 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lemon Hill (band) User:Rnb 15:22, 25 April 2009 (UTC) delete Band does not appear to meet . While I'm willing to accept that there is a reference in the Sun-Sentinel that can't be accessed online, I don't find the other two references to be compelling enough to meet the guidelines Deletion of Lemon Hill (band) WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4219 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adhil Bakeer Markar User:EricSerge 17:40, 23 October 2016 (UTC) delete per nomination and Deletion of Adhil Bakeer Markar WP:ONEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4220 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Sweeney User:reddogsix 22:35, 16 February 2015 (UTC) delete fails to demonstrate any |notability Deletion of Charlotte Sweeney WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4221 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of currently running Broadway shows User:danntm 15:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC) delete per |Wikipedia is not a playbill, and this list provides not added value (cf. Deletion of List of currently running Broadway shows WP:NOT||WP:LIST Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4222 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Editorialist User:Ohnoitsjamie 19:27, 18 September 2016 (UTC) keep While not a slam dunk for , the coverage reasonable given that this is a niche topic area Deletion of Editorialist WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4223 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greyson Michael Chance User:Oakshade 04:42, 17 May 2010 (UTC) keep Having over 15 17 million views in itself demonstrates notability. And since this AfD started, he signed with Interscope Records (same label as Lady Gaga). Oh yeah, and he's had very in-depth coverage from reliable sources, the core criteria of . At this point, editors |crystal ball speculation of the future ''non''-notability of this person is willful ignorance Deletion of Greyson Michael Chance WP:NOTABILITY||WP:CRYSTALBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4224 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colares UFO flap User:LuckyLouie 03:26, 13 December 2013 (UTC) delete According to the article, UFOs supposedly attacked people with radiation beams on an island in Brazil. There are no objective sources available to show notability of these |extraordinary claims Deletion of Colares UFO flap WP:REDFLAG Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4225 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global pharmaceutical prices User:SlamDiego 18:35, 31 January 2008 (UTC) delete Indeed notable, but this article is |“original research” and appears to be written to push a |point-of-view Deletion of Global pharmaceutical prices WP:OR||WP:NPOV Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4226 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harald Ende User:Ben 20:14, 2 February 2014 (UTC) delete Nothing found about him, even not in german sources, that could make him notable. He is an orchestral musician that played for a notable band leader, doesn't makes himself |notable Deletion of Harald Ende WP:PEOPLE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4227 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consumption junction User:Royboycrashfan 00:26, 1 March 2006 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Consumption junction WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4228 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Maguire (American football) User:Cbl62 10:22, 30 July 2017 (UTC) keep Maguire was a starting quarterback for Florida State Seminoles football|Florida State, one of the most elite football teams in the county, in 2015. Passes . Even aside from extensive local coverage in the ''Tallahassee Democrat'' (e.g., http://www.tallahassee.com/story/sports/college/fsu/football/2016/08/14/fsu-qb-sean-maguire-past-few-days-have-been-pretty-devastating/88719118/ here), he also received significant coverage in other multiple reliable sources, including national media outlets like ESPN.com (http://www.espn.com/blog/acc/post/_/id/96545/sean-maguire-deserved-spotlight-on-florida-states-senior-night here), ''USA Today'' (https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/2016/06/22/fsu-player-profile-sean-maguire/86259084/ here, http://ftw.usatoday.com/2014/09/meet-sean-maguire-florida-state-jameis-winston-suspended here), NBC Sports (http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/04/11/sean-maguire-is-fsus-qb-to-beat-but-he-is-not-unbeatable/ here), CBS Sports (https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/maguire-looks-to-defy-odds-earn-nfl-opportunity/ here and https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/what-do-we-know-about-florida-state-qb-sean-maguire/ here) and ''Sports Illustrated'' (https://www.si.com/college-football/2014/09/22/florida-state-sean-maguire-jameis-winston here), as well as major metropolitan newspapers like the ''Orlando Sentinel'' (http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/florida-state-seminoles/os-fsu-sean-maguire-football-1119-20151118-story.html here) and the ''Miami Herald'' (http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/college/acc/florida-state-university/article30804939.html here Deletion of Sean Maguire (American football) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4229 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro-Hunter User:TenPoundHammer 17:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC) comment Forums are not |reliable sources. Also, if the watch was the subject of an auction, then that might mean that the ''auction'' is notable -- it doesn't necessarily mean the ''watch'' is Deletion of Pro-Hunter WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4230 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Lindauer (2nd nomination) NONE NONE delete per . In the first five (5) pages of google results, I found only the following references from reliable sources. All were about her arrest and trial Deletion of Susan Lindauer (2nd nomination) WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +4231 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008-09 Bowling Green Falcons men's ice hockey season User:Paulmcdonald 18:26, 1 November 2008 (UTC) keep aside from which this article obviously meets by being the highest level of the amateur sport, there is enough significant coverage to warrant an article on its own outside of . Notable. Verifiable. Worthwhile Deletion of 2008-09 Bowling Green Falcons men's ice hockey season WP:ATHLETE||WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4232 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TeeKay-421 (2nd nomination) User:Legacypac 03:56, 29 May 2017 (UTC) delete as not passing and we have removed many more notable clubs before Deletion of TeeKay-421 (2nd nomination) WP:NORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4233 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewdar (2nd nomination) User:Weirdoactor 13:25, 4 January 2007 (UTC) keep """Satisfies in triplicate (which is policy, not a guideline, as is ). The Delete votes here (as in the original AfD) seem to be either jokes (""""crap sense""""?), """"per"""" votes (which is laziness/bad faith, as this is a debate, NOT a vote) or they don't quote actual policy. Using bureaucracy to commit article murder is bad faith. Shame! You hug your mother with the hands on the same fingers you type these delete votes with? Oy! You should BE so lucky""" Deletion of Jewdar (2nd nomination) WP:V||WP:NEO Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4234 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Library Corporation (TLC) User:Cullen328 04:41, 31 May 2011 (UTC) keep The nominator admits that two or three of the references verify notability. If the topic is notable, then the solution to a promotional tone is to edit the article to reflect a |neutral point of view , not to delete an article about a notable topic. We are here to improve an encyclopedia, not to reduce it or to delete legitimate encyclopedic content Deletion of The Library Corporation (TLC) WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +4235 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Israel–Kenya relations User:Johnuniq 09:04, 13 July 2009 (UTC) delete """No one here has shown any particular knowledge of relations between Israel and Kenya (I don't have any either). So all we have is some editors saying the news stories and government announcements that mention Israel and Kenya show the relations are notable, while other editors say those same articles do ''not'' establish notability. That's precisely why we have which requires some independent analysis that concludes the topic has general significance. If this were an article about some recent musical fashion, I wouldn't care. However, the """"relations"""" articles are core encyclopedic content and articles such as this (even if expanded with the information mentioned above) will only ever be a |synthesis of factoids with no """"so what"""" exposition. There are some significant issues in some of the articles mentioned above; those issues should be part of articles about the ''events''. None of the sources mentioned claim that Kenya is important to Israel, or that Israel is important to Kenya""" Deletion of Israel–Kenya relations WP:GNG||WP:SYNTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4236 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Harley Worthington User:Jahnx 08:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC) delete per nom, fails and Deletion of David Harley Worthington WP:MUSIC||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4237 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elixir institute of information technology User:Erpert 04:11, 26 May 2011 (UTC) delete per #G11|G11; tagged as such. Blatant advertisment for non-notable company; article |created by its founder. In addition, the company name barely has ten Ghits. '''Erpert Deletion of Elixir institute of information technology WP:CSD||WP:COI Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +4238 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wyatt Strahan User:Whiteguru 10:55, 16 May 2021 (UTC) delete Too many ERA's ... Minor league player, no signs of passing Deletion of Wyatt Strahan WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4239 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marugoto Anjyu Gakuen User:Dream 21:58, 11 February 2009 (UTC) keep Google its name and get 41,700 hits. I value the community over that of the opinions of reviewers, and of course not being officially released in English yet, and the fact that those you consider notable media do not review manga, means you can't really get a fair coverage of it. Even those sites that do review manga, don't do it for all types out there. But if this many people talk about it, clearly its worth noting. Remember, the polices are just suggestions, everything decided by consensus. Read: Deletion of Marugoto Anjyu Gakuen WP:BURO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4240 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lil Rok Playaz User:Starblind 22:57, 22 January 2007 (UTC) delete I see a Myspace page but not much else, certainly nothing resembling |reliable sources. You'd think if they released a single with Kanye West that might have been mentioned somewhere, y'know? Delete per Deletion of Lil Rok Playaz WP:RS||WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4241 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Independent Group User:Ralbegen 12:44, 28 February 2019 (UTC) keep This clearly passes the GNG. There is a lot of of in-depth coverage of this group, and there will continue to be even if it ceases to exist. If it ceases to grow, it still meets notability criteria. I don't see why is being invoked given the sheer volume of independent reliable source coverage Deletion of The Independent Group WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +4242 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagvir Singh User:Joseph2302 14:40, 20 June 2021 (UTC) merge until he makes a first team appearance, as a valid Deletion of Jagvir Singh WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +4243 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel User:Alaney2k 16:59, 15 July 2016 (UTC) merge per Deletion of Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel WP:PERPETRATOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4244 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Guinean films of 1994 User:Atlantic306 18:48, 11 November 2018 (UTC) merge as above, does not pass LIST,thanks Deletion of List of Guinean films of 1994 WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4245 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Liw User:Lepricavark 16:46, 17 January 2018 (UTC) keep weak nom statement that indicates failure to do and lack of familiarity with the subject. These reckless nominations really need to stop soon, or a topic ban will be pursued Deletion of Daniel Liw WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +4246 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torment (2008 film) User:Brewcrewer 06:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Torment (2008 film) WP:MOVIE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4247 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Osei Kwasi Boamah Brown User:TonyStarks 16:37, 12 March 2012 (UTC) delete Fails and . No significant media coverage other than routine coverage of football matches he was part of Deletion of Mark Osei Kwasi Boamah Brown WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4248 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Gelin User:HelloAnnyong 15:03, 27 February 2008 (UTC) delete Fails . &mdash Deletion of Martin Gelin WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4249 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWE Rivalries User:LM2000 13:37, 4 January 2015 (UTC) delete I think that this may be one that passes notability requirements at some point but we're not there yet. It's a relatively new show that hasn't received much coverage out of the Deletion of WWE Rivalries WP:ROUTINE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4250 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erich Reimer (2nd nomination) User:TheGracefulSlick 19:09, 7 December 2018 (UTC) delete I see a lot of itation overkill|cite overkill, especially in the section regarding his political career, but little in adequate, in-depth sources to pass |GNG Deletion of Erich Reimer (2nd nomination) WP:C||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Copyrights 60 +4251 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debra Dean User:The 20:36, 1 June 2018 (UTC) keep since subject meets , unless my brain cells are playing games again Deletion of Debra Dean WP:NAUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4252 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Wars Episode VII (2nd nomination) User:Robsinden 10:34, 31 October 2012 (UTC) comment """Have any of the editors voting for """"keep"""" read ? I hope the closing admin takes this into account too""" Deletion of Star Wars Episode VII (2nd nomination) WP:ATA Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +4253 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aqua Jones User:Esradekan 23:41, 4 April 2009 (UTC) delete fails notability per . Searching finds no significant coverage in |reliable, third-party, sources. Just another facebook/myspace/|garage band. Hell, garageband.com is one of their external links Deletion of Aqua Jones WP:MUSIC||WP:RS||WP:GARAGE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4254 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UTRGV Soccer and Track & Field Complex User:Tristan 10:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC) merge to Texas–Rio Grande Valley Vaqueros. There is nothing special about this complex (not historic, important or very large) and it does not pass . All keep votes are based on the assertion that stadia of teams in such a league are presumed to be notable. However, they fail to show a policy/guideline/essay that suggests such a consensus Deletion of UTRGV Soccer and Track & Field Complex WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4255 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firdous Shamim Naqvi User:Saqib 06:37, 28 July 2017 (UTC) delete doesn't pass Deletion of Firdous Shamim Naqvi WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4256 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darth Epsis User:Patar 03:32, 16 February 2009 (UTC) delete It seems to be a |hoax, and there's no mention on Wookiepedia Deletion of Darth Epsis WP:HOAX Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes 40 +4257 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Nirenberg User:RayAYang 04:18, 31 January 2013 (UTC) delete is for people who are primarily notable as scholars. Subject is a podiatrist who speaks to reporters, and does not appear to have a significant scholarly role which would qualify him to pass #C7. Thus, we default to the GNG/, which he does not pass Deletion of Michael Nirenberg WP:PROF||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4258 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mustang Ironheart User:Bakazaka 21:38, 29 April 2019 (UTC) delete per . The DVD(s) existed at some point, and the college paper once had a story on these two low-budget filmmakers, but that's not enough to establish notability, and the rest is traceable only through user-created sites and copies of the Wikipedia article, meaning that it fails . A newspaper archive search came up empty as well Deletion of Mustang Ironheart WP:V||WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4259 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rspoprockband User:Edison 04:28, 10 December 2008 (UTC) delete No independent and reliable sources to establish notability. Myspace and Youtube and the like. Fails and Deletion of Rspoprockband WP:N||WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4260 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deuce (singer) (2nd nomination) User:DMacks 22:19, 24 January 2012 (UTC) delete and salt per nom and previous AfDs. Some previous claims of notability were based on produced works, which (per their previous AfDs) were found to be non-notable, and for a person isn't just being prolific or being an individual in a notable or prolific group Deletion of Deuce (singer) (2nd nomination) WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4261 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Down the Block There's a Riot User:Mrschimpf 23:13, 9 November 2010 (UTC) keep Nominator has |ownership issues when it comes to ''Desperate Housewives'' articles and this is an abuse of the AfD process in order to get their way with what they forsee is either an incorrect episode title or an article they didn't get to create. Episode title is http://tvlistings.zap2it.com/tv/desperate-housewives-down-the-block-theres-a-riot/EP006723180157s sourced here Deletion of Down the Block There's a Riot WP:OWN Wikipedia:Ownership of content 43 +4262 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pak Watan User:Boing 09:22, 14 March 2012 (UTC) delete Ignoring all the arguments about interaction bans, bad faith, etc, the article only has a definition of the word plus examples of its uses in song lyrics - and that looks like a textbook to me. If there are sources out there that refer to it in more than a dicdef way, I'm not seeing them - but if anyone can find any and expand the article with what they say, I'll be happy to change my mind Deletion of Pak Watan WP:DICDEF Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +4263 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venaculas (2nd nomination) User:Artene50 19:08, 22 June 2012 (UTC) delete Most of the sources are not independent and the listed web links are connected to this band in some way Deletion of Venaculas (2nd nomination) WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4264 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Project (film) User:Lugnuts 12:40, 28 February 2014 (UTC) delete Fails (maybe the title is ''Untitled Project''!) and is unref'd too Deletion of Untitled Project (film) WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4265 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Monk Gets Lotto Fever User:Sgeureka 08:33, 12 August 2010 (UTC) merge No evidence of otability, violates OT#PLOT. &ndash Deletion of Mr. Monk Gets Lotto Fever WP:N||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4266 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1944 Cheshunt B 24 Bomber crash User:Armbrust 17:36, 2 August 2010 (UTC) delete per . It doesn't has long standing impact Deletion of 1944 Cheshunt B 24 Bomber crash WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4267 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carol Hiller User:Alias 20:27, 6 July 2006 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Carol Hiller WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4268 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darknet Horror User:Boffob 14:34, 10 December 2008 (UTC) delete per , Deletion of Darknet Horror WP:MADEUP||WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +4269 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japanese exonyms User:Finnusertop 21:49, 20 November 2016 (UTC) delete not enough RS to confirm that this meets /. Even if such sources are presented, this article is dubious in terms of . –  Deletion of Japanese exonyms WP:GNG||WP:LISTN||WP:NOTDICT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4270 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ogonek and Cooh User:Alexwcovington 08:46, 22 April 2006 (UTC) keep it's rough but it's fixable. The group seems to have a following in major nightclubs. Eastern European culture, keep it to fight Deletion of Ogonek and Cooh WP:BIAS Wikipedia:Systemic bias 83 +4271 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agg User:Royboycrashfan 02:55, 9 March 2006 (UTC) delete WP:NEO|neologism|cruft Deletion of Agg WP:CRUFT Wikipedia:Fancruft 61 +4272 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 United Arab Emirates Under-19 Tri-Nation tournament User:Smartyllama 18:38, 19 May 2017 (UTC) keep per the sources provided above, which show that is met Deletion of 2016 United Arab Emirates Under-19 Tri-Nation tournament WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4273 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Mazo User:SwisterTwister 02:45, 22 September 2016 (UTC) delete as insufficiently notable as a — does not rise to threshold of |NOTABILITY as a musician; adopt Deletion of Danny Mazo WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4274 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S.H.I.E.L.D. (Marvel animated universe) User:Andy14and16 03:56, 20 May 2010 (UTC) keep Lists, categories and navigation templates are synergistic—the benefits of their redundancy are covered in . This is a useful and informative list and meets the guidelines for inclusion per Deletion of S.H.I.E.L.D. (Marvel animated universe) WP:CLN||WP:LIST Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates 5 +4275 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen M.D. Chang User:Wikipedical 20:09, 13 October 2012 (UTC) delete """Fails to meet with no |reliable sources. Should not vote 'keep' while """"guessing"""" that more sources are available""" Deletion of Stephen M.D. Chang WP:N||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4276 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newgen Software (2nd nomination) User:HighKing 12:09, 23 March 2021 (UTC) delete """The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per is for multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |""""Independent Content"""". """"Independent content"""", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. None of the references in the article meet the criteria, most are bog standard PR or articles based entirely on announcements. Having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails """ Deletion of Newgen Software (2nd nomination) WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4277 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rock-afire Explosion (2nd nomination) User:FoCuSandLeArN 17:28, 31 August 2014 (UTC) delete Clearly non-notable and written by someone with a |COI. Sources provided are severely deficient in that they are only 4, and absolutely non-reliable. The language is unencyclopaedic. Perhaps a small mention in the Showbiz Pizza Place article is merited, but not more than that in my opinion Deletion of The Rock-afire Explosion (2nd nomination) WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +4278 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uzi-Eli Hezi User:The 16:12, 11 July 2020 (UTC) delete this |promotional text about a non-|notable subject Deletion of Uzi-Eli Hezi WP:PROMO||WP:NPERSON Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4279 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avi Tuschman User:Jytdog 22:27, 21 May 2015 (UTC) delete per DGG - young scholar with one book. I will add that there have been two paid editors and an editor claiming to be Tuschman active at the article. I will be happy if we are able to delete this article and end all this pressure to violate Deletion of Avi Tuschman WP:PROMO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4280 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of endangered animal species User:JimMillerJr 17:00, 20 February 2010 (UTC) keep to IUCN Red List endangered anamalia species and continue to break up a list that is currently over 1100 kB, far beyond the size for a . If this one is not kept, some kind of breakdown should be found to get this into multiple lists of reasonable page lengths. The anamalia list is over 600kB by itself, so there may be a better method than splitting by kingdom. IUCN Red List endangered species is far too large to remain a single list Deletion of List of endangered animal species WP:SPLIT Wikipedia:Splitting 82 +4281 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Busty Dusty User:Edgarde 13:42, 13 November 2008 (UTC) delete I know this performer exists, but I doubt she meets any standard Deletion of Busty Dusty WP:PORNBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4282 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Wallis User:Devonian 12:36, 7 October 2020 (UTC) keep the articles in ''Vice'' and on CTV are both examples of SIGVOC in reliable sources, therefore meaning that he passes Deletion of Steve Wallis WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4283 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trof User:Champion 03:39, 22 July 2018 (UTC) delete does not meet Deletion of Trof WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4284 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert M. Wolters (second nomination) User:Unfocused 16:50, 17 October 2005 (UTC) keep This is clear and convincing evidence that AfD '''''AND''''' VFU occasionally make mistakes. |Ignore all rules has been successfully applied to improve the encyclopedia. Wikilawyers who value process over the end product should try not to take this personally, and then if they're still upset over this, reconsider whether they're actually helping create an encyclopedia or not Deletion of Albert M. Wolters (second nomination) WP:IAR Wikipedia:Ignore all rules 63 +4285 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progressive stack (2nd nomination) User:Rhododendrites 23:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC) keep satisfies . Additional sources provided below --&mdash Deletion of Progressive stack (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4286 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sâmbure de drac User:Gongshow 04:45, 3 September 2011 (UTC) delete doesn't appear to meet . The coverage I found, at best, looks trivial (e.g., http://www.libertatea.ro/detalii/articol/animal-x-single-nou-342684.htmlhttp://www.evz.ro/detalii/stiri/nisip-purtat-de-vant-de-la-animal-x-826372.html Deletion of Sâmbure de drac WP:NALBUMS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4287 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rowan Hamilton User:Bearian 21:12, 10 June 2010 (UTC) delete fails , , and Deletion of Rowan Hamilton WP:RS||WP:BLP||WP:PROF Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4288 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 Maria Sharapova tennis season User:Cbl62 16:56, 22 August 2014 (UTC) comment """This one is not an easy call for me. A couple preliminary points. First, there is room for reasonable debate over which individual tennis seasons merit stand-alone articles, but I think that broader debate is best held elsewhere. Second, the article in its current format is in the nature of a statistical compilation; that's a reason to improve (to make the article more like 2013 Serena Williams tennis season) but not necessarily reason to delete. What matters for AfD purposes is not the current state of the article, but whether Sharapova's 2013 season has received significant coverage satisfying . By Sharapova's recent standards, her 2013 season was an """"off"""" year, but still decent. She did not win any majors, but she did win the BNP Paribas and Porsche tournaments, played in the finals at the French Open, and was ranked No. 3 in the world when her season ended prematurely due to injury. Coverage of her 2013 season includes '''(1)''' http://au.ibtimes.com/articles/527537/20131205/maria-sharapova.htm#.U_dtqvldVyU this article from the ''International Business Times'' specifically focused on Sharapova's 2013 tennis season. A google search for Sharapova and """"2013 season"""" turns up 41,000 hits, including '''(2)''' http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/16/sports/tennis/sharapova-is-back-in-the-game-and-as-driven-as-ever.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 this from ''The New York Times'' focusing largely on her 2013 season, '''(3)''' http://www.si.com/tennis/beyond-baseline/2013/10/07/maria-sharapova-withdraws-from-wta-championships-shoulder-injury this from ''Sports Illustrated'', '''(4)''' http://www.upi.com/Sports_News/2013/10/07/Shoulder-injury-ends-Sharapovas-season/UPI-79501381162127/ this this from the UPI, '''(5)''' http://www.tennischannel.com/news/NewsDetails.aspx?newsid=12269 this from Tennis Channel, and '''(6)''' http://www.tennisnow.com/News/2013-in-Review-Maria-Sharapova.aspx this from TennisNow focusing on S's 2013 tennis season. I am still on the fence on """"keep"""" vs. """"delete"""" but thought I'd offer some of my preliminary thoughts""" Deletion of 2013 Maria Sharapova tennis season WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4289 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How NOT to steal a SideKick 2 User:Blue520 09:29, 9 June 2006 (UTC) delete verifiability problems / Deletion of How NOT to steal a SideKick 2 WP:V||WP:RS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4290 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elena Nozdran User:Stvbastian 05:26, 29 July 2017 (UTC) keep meet #1, 3, and 5 Deletion of Elena Nozdran WP:NBADMINTON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4291 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajesh P Barnwal User:David 04:11, 4 April 2020 (UTC) delete """Citations far below the level needed for #C1 in a high-citation field. I don't know what """"listed guide for the fellow"""" means but I'm pretty sure it doesn't satisfy #C3. ACM Senior Member also definitely doesn't count for notability (it is two levels below the level of membership that does, fellow). And I don't see anything else that could even be plausible as an argument for notability""" Deletion of Rajesh P Barnwal WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4292 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey Clement User:Michig 10:09, 29 January 2012 (UTC) keep or '''Redirect''' to Selena Gomez & the Scene. Member of two notable bands, if that can be verified, so passes ctiterion 6 - I couldn't find a reliable source for his membership of the Midwest Kings and none of the sources in that article mention him. If we can't verify that, redirect to the other band per standard practice for musicians without individual notability Deletion of Joey Clement WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4293 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power ring (DC Comics) User:SudoGhost 05:35, 15 October 2011 (UTC) keep """Many topics are dependent on other topics, this is not a reason for deletion. The first reference above is not a trivial mention, the introduction alone addresses the subject in detail, meaning no original research is needed to extract the content, and is more than a trivial mention. The second reference is the same, it is not the primary topic of the source, but it is much more than a trivial mention. Same with the third reference above. It easily passes ''significant coverage'', as well as the other requirements detailed in . The fourth reference directly discusses the ring in great detail, with it being the primary topic of that section. In no way could that be considered """"|trivial"""". There are multiple reliable, third-party sources, thus the article fulfills the requirements of """ Deletion of Power ring (DC Comics) WP:GNG||WP:TRIVIAL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4294 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oh my actual god User:Coredesat 21:49, 27 June 2006 (UTC) delete nonsense, fails Deletion of Oh my actual god WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +4295 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DbXpert for Oracle User:Shruti14 18:58, 16 August 2007 (UTC) delete per Deletion of DbXpert for Oracle WP:NOTABILITY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4296 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thefederalist.com User:Horologium 07:39, 28 September 2014 (UTC) keep Once again, we have what can only be described as a partisan witch hunt against another conservative blog. Every single argument that has been used against this blog was addressed at the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Americablog (2nd nomination)|second deletion discussion for Americablog, which was kept, and the same arguments were used (just two weeks previous to the AFD for Americablog) at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zombietime|the Zombietime AFD, which was deleted. There is a clear double standard on Wikipedia when it comes to blogs, and it's time that the editors here recognize that the problem is getting noticed by more and more sources, and it is going to increase the credibility gap. Don't bother to cite ; I've been here long enough to know the criteria for that argument, and recognize that it only applies when the argument runs against the dominant paradigm here. Before you flame me (and I'm sure that I'll be flamed) please read though those two AFDs and recognize that there is little difference (except for the outcome) between those two discussions, and how closely that they both parallel to this discussion Deletion of Thefederalist.com WP:WAX Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +4297 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Goodman (footballer) User:Nfitz 04:33, 12 January 2014 (UTC) keep meets as has played on fully professional team. The requirement is a fully professional team, not a fully professional league - Conference National is a mostly-professional league Deletion of Jake Goodman (footballer) WP:FOOTYN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4298 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prison cell pony party User:TheSpecialUser 17:17, 27 May 2012 (UTC) delete no proper refs and no coverage under thus fails . Also notability of the term as well as concept is at question Deletion of Prison cell pony party WP:RS||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4299 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of QI episodes User:Paul 15:58, 7 September 2013 (UTC) keep Hang on a minute, don't we list all the HIGNFY episodes, who appeared, who won, etc? And don't we recap episode storylines in countless drama series in a similar way to what is done here? I don't personally think is a valid reason to delete here. That would only apply if someone decided to make an article for every single episode, rather than for each series. I tend to agree that comparing this to shows such as Deal or No Deal is misleading Deletion of List of QI episodes WP:EPISODE Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +4300 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zii User:Schuym1 18:37, 31 December 2008 (UTC) delete Doesn't show notability per Deletion of Zii WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4301 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kadrolsha Ona Carole User:PaleoNeonate 21:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC) delete I have tried to find more references in reliable sources like newspapers but failed. Cameo appearences also don't count, even in the filmography of notable actors. The movie(s) also appear rather underground. I know of the Toxic Avenger, but never heard of Toxic Tutu before. It's possible that future events may increase notability and that it's simply Deletion of Kadrolsha Ona Carole WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +4302 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Awake (Hillsong album) User:Canyouhearmenow 02:03, 2 July 2014 (UTC) delete This album in no way meets the requirements. Billboard nor Cashbox have record of this title. Even though a few mention of it exist, I do not feel it meets the criteria to remain viable on Wikipedia Deletion of Awake (Hillsong album) :WP:NALBUMS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4303 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twisted Attitude (truck) User:Quarl NONE delete as |non-notable. Wow, I didn't realize we had :Category:Monster trucks|so much about monster trucks. I guess it's a fan area like any other. &mdash Deletion of Twisted Attitude (truck) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4304 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EEE SUST User:Pgallert 21:17, 16 December 2011 (UTC) merge with SUST. If the parent article becomes too long, it would be strategically better to create separate pages for the Schools, and only if those get too long as well should the departments have separate WP pages. Technically (), the EEE department is not separately notable at this time Deletion of EEE SUST WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4305 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital anomie User:Stuartyeates 10:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC) delete as per Deletion of Digital anomie WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +4306 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young American Virtuosi User:Cocytus 03:05, 16 December 2009 (UTC) delete nothing I can find that makes them pass . Thus, does not merit inclusion Deletion of Young American Virtuosi WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4307 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pradip Somasundaran User:202 05:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC) keep Pradip has been on the music scene since 1996 since he won Meri Awaz Suno. This music show was the forerunner of the many later music shows such as Sa Re Ga Ma and Indian Idol. Also note that he is a major celebrity in his home state of Kerala. Also according to not many people outside South India will know him. Hence, he is culturaaly significant for him to merit an article over here Deletion of Pradip Somasundaran WP:BIAS Wikipedia:Systemic bias 83 +4308 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 Colorado's 7th congressional district election User:Love 04:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC) merge """per {{U|Reywas92}}. Also, . These elections are held every two years, as required by law. And as ROUTINE says, """"Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill|Run-of-the-mill events—common, everyday, ordinary items that do not stand out—are probably not notable."""" Of course, these elections do not happen every day, but the fact that they are held every two years without fail also points to a common, ordinary occurrence. It's why we automatically have articles on special elections, because they do NOT fall into a ROUTINE sort of standard when it comes to the regular election cycle""" Deletion of 2006 Colorado's 7th congressional district election WP:ROUTINE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4309 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiffany Page User:AllyD 16:50, 11 September 2011 (UTC) comment The damage done to the article isn't really a justification for deletion. As to whether she meets the |Notability criteria, #1 might be argued by the UK press attention (http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2009/oct/22/new-band-tiffany-page Guardian 2009 article, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music/rockandpopfeatures/7544761/New-faces-Tiffany-Page.html Daily Telegraph 2010, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1255613/The-Next-Big-Thing-Tiffany-Page.html Daily Mail 2010) but it feels more like comment on PR push than solid critical attention. So more would be needed Deletion of Tiffany Page :WP:NMUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4310 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. D. Westmoreland User:SL93 23:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC) delete Appears to fail Deletion of J. D. Westmoreland WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4311 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajeev Janardan User:ThaddeusB 22:36, 16 May 2009 (UTC) keep per diligent |WP:AFTER performed by Deletion of Rajeev Janardan WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +4312 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fergie second studio album User:Bondegezou 12:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC) comment """As I see it, this project ''already'' exists. That is, there has been a body of activity creating something. Even if the project was abandoned today, it would still warrant some sort of mention (probably in Fergie (singer)). So, that's why I think the """"almost certain to take place"""" bit of is not relevant here. As a body of work, something has already taken place. Thus, looking at all of , and , it seems to me the most important criterion is verifiability. I accept your case elsewhere that there's only one reliable citation given. Unless more turn up, that's insufficient for a standalone article and the material should be merged with Fergie (singer). If more become available, it seems to me that an article is warranted (and allowed under ). So, basically, I agree with your last bit above, if I might quote selectively: """"Information ... can be merged into Fergie (singer) ... Unless ... there is considerable non-trivial coverage""" Deletion of Fergie second studio album WP:CRYSTAL||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:MUSIC||WP:N||WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4313 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juni Cortez User:K 01:40, 1 October 2017 (UTC) delete not independently notable of Spy Kids (franchise); no sources to meet . A redirect of the name only can be done later at editorial discretion. No need to preserve article history as it's all in-universe content Deletion of Juni Cortez WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4314 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geomajas User:LiberalFascist 21:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC) delete There is no online coverage of this besides press releases and blogs. The links provided in the article are all to the company's website, or to press releases (with advert-like company profile at the bottom) requires multiple reliable secondary sources, of which none are available that I can find Deletion of Geomajas WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4315 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Langford (computer scientist) User:Eric 17:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC) keep Meets criterion #1 (significant impact in scholarly discipline, broadly construed), as shown by David Eppstein’s search. The Science article alone, with its 2037 Google Scholar citations, makes it very difficult to argue for deletion Deletion of John Langford (computer scientist) WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4316 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Current characters of The Young and the Restless User:Rjd0060 04:57, 18 November 2007 (UTC) delete Per the nom. Completely a character |plot. Unnecessary; any importance of these characters should be (...probably already is) mentioned in one of the other articles for the show Deletion of Current characters of The Young and the Restless WP:PLOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4317 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grandayy User:Bakazza 18:13, 17 January 2019 (UTC) keep as per above and improve - It passes asic as per Deletion of Grandayy WP:B Wikipedia:Bots 91 +4318 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative versions of Deadpool User:Adamant1 07:04, 19 September 2020 (UTC) delete I looked through a lot of the sources provided by both Andrew and Darkknight2149. I just don't find any of them compelling for notability them though nice 99% (or all) of them are just top lists that very briefly mention the alternative versions. So, I don't think they or the subject passes the in-depth coverage clause to the notability guidelines. I'd be willing to change my opinion if there was a serious article about the alternatives though. It's highly possible one of the sources was, but that I just missed it. Although, it would take more then one to pass Deletion of Alternative versions of Deadpool WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4319 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Snapple Real Facts User:Gobonobo 21:55, 12 January 2014 (UTC) delete per . This is an unsourced list of trivia that is printed inside of Snapple bottle caps Deletion of List of Snapple Real Facts WP:INDISCRIMINATE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4320 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Groasis Waterboxx NONE NONE keep Content is referenced and contains little or no claims beyond what can be |reliably referenced Deletion of Groasis Waterboxx WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4321 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandler Hoffman User:GiantSnowman 09:17, 5 January 2012 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Chandler Hoffman WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4322 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Start Fitness User:Darylgolden 11:35, 3 April 2020 (UTC) delete """the third reference ''could'' be counted as significant coverage but the other Chronicle Live source focuses mainly only on the race. With significant coverage in only one source, the company does not meet . Searching on Google News also turns up no sources, but this could have been muddled by """"Start Fitness"""" being a common phrase""" Deletion of Start Fitness WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4323 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhamad Naji Subhi Al Juhani (2nd nomination) NONE NONE delete Plain and simple - doesn't meet the notability standards of . For a person to be notable s/he must recieve significant coverage in independant and/or secondary sources. This person hasn't recieved coverage in independant and/or secondary coverage. ''A fortiori'', he hasn't recieved significant coverage Deletion of Muhamad Naji Subhi Al Juhani (2nd nomination) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4324 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trick arrows User:Zxcvbnm 18:00, 16 January 2020 (UTC) delete Maybe potential for a List of arrow types that could go alongside :Category:Arrow types, but this particular article is just fancruft and should be deleted per Deletion of Trick arrows WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +4325 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trail Bologna User:Arxiloxos 02:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC) keep In addition to the above, more than 50 hits at Google Books and nearly 200 at Google News archives back up what's offered so far. (Many of them are from local papers, e.g. http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=0CZcAAAAIBAJ&sjid=XFUNAAAAIBAJ&pg=3204,5809055&dq=trail-bologna+troyer&hl=enhttp://news.google.com/newspapers?id=yDBPAAAAIBAJ&sjid=kwIEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6942,1988907&dq=trail-bologna+troyer&hl=en, but here's a mention in the ''Los Angeles Times''http://articles.latimes.com/print/1987-08-09/travel/tr-60_1_plain-people.) Article badly needs a clean-up and wikilinking, but this seems to be a legitimately notable bit of local folkway cuisine. Let's |bite the bologna and not the newbie creators of this article Deletion of Trail Bologna WP:BITE Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers 56 +4326 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tejasvi Surya (2nd nomination) User:Highpeaks35 02:36, 25 May 2019 (UTC) keep passes Deletion of Tejasvi Surya (2nd nomination) WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4327 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Parents Favorite Music User:Atyndall 03:07, 15 July 2008 (UTC) delete 0 google news results, no notable sources, user has been asked to add good sources. I think it fails |music notability criteria.   Deletion of My Parents Favorite Music WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4328 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of self-referential songs (5th nomination) User:Moreschi 22:29, 27 August 2007 (UTC) delete Wikipedia is |not an indiscriminate collection of information. This is an unreferenced indiscriminate collection of information. No evidence presented that anyone cares Deletion of List of self-referential songs (5th nomination) WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4329 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Chappell User:Clarityfiend 08:45, 29 December 2019 (UTC) keep """but not because of an honorary degree from Colby College. That's not """"a well-known and significant award or honor"""". He has, however, received a significant amount of media coverage: https://www.nytimes.com/1996/12/22/magazine/god-and-toothpaste.html an article in ''The New York Times Magazine'', https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/1991-09-01/tom-chappell-sweet-success-from-unsweetened-toothpaste a Bloomberg article, https://www.npr.org/2018/01/22/569432668/toms-of-maine-tom-chappell an interview on NPR with Guy Raz, https://www.forbes.com/forbes/2009/0316/090_river_runs_through_it.html#6b93d37af78a a ''Forbes'' article, etc., so is satisfied""" Deletion of Tom Chappell WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4330 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeemon User:Malkinann 00:11, 10 October 2010 (UTC) merge to Challenge_of_the_GoBots#Characters per Deletion of Zeemon WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +4331 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naomi Andrews User:Muboshgu 16:26, 27 August 2018 (UTC) merge this is a clear case of a non notable political candidate with a campaign advertisement masquerading as a biographical article. Most if the article is non biographical political positions. Much for an article on this candidate. –  Deletion of Naomi Andrews WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +4332 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soldier Front User:Black 18:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC) keep The article has been significantly improved (including sources) since the AfD was placed (see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Soldier_Front&oldid=107955391). Also, I don't find it very appropriate to nominate a |speedy-able article for deletion '''7 minutes''' after its creation. I appreciate the work new-page watchers do, but non-speedyable articles can be added to one's Watchlist or bookmarked Deletion of Soldier Front WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +4333 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norman Wielsch User:DBigXray 20:43, 2 September 2018 (UTC) delete per Fails Significant coverage over the years. only mentioned for his arrest Deletion of Norman Wielsch WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4334 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fairground Gaming User:2005 01:07, 5 March 2007 (UTC) keep """Easily met , now article needs to say """"was"""". If all the assets went somewhere else, it could be redirected there, but we have :Category:Defunct gambling companies for a reason""" Deletion of Fairground Gaming WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4335 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of wedding guests of Prince William, Duke of Cambridge, and Catherine Middleton User:Tarc 19:05, 17 May 2011 (UTC) delete Perhaps a bit of commonsense will flourish this time around, and we'll realize that the |Wikipedia is not a publishing arm of the Daily Mail or the Sun. Who attended a wedding is not even the slightest bit noteworthy, it is dumb tabloid obsession with All Things Royal(tm Deletion of List of wedding guests of Prince William, Duke of Cambridge, and Catherine Middleton WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4336 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corteva Agriscience User:doomsdayer520 18:46, 17 April 2019 (UTC) comment The article has been expanded since the AfD so perhaps that motivated the article's creator. We can see if anyone still thinks the company is non-notable, but I have no disputes with the outcome of the AfD per the standard Deletion of Corteva Agriscience WP:HEYMANN Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard 85 +4337 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Counter-Strike Online User:Gavin 08:40, 15 October 2007 (UTC) delete Single sentence stub and lack of |secondary sources means this article fails to demonstrate |notability Deletion of Counter-Strike Online WP:V||WP:WEB Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4338 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of fictional future events User:Ian 23:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC) keep Actually Johnbod has made most of the points I intended to. I will just add that simply doesn’t apply, and that the fact that it is entertaining makes it not in the least unencyclopaedic Deletion of Timeline of fictional future events WP:NOTCRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4339 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abeiku Adams User:Kosack 08:28, 11 February 2017 (UTC) delete his three appearances for RoPS came when they were in the second tier in Finland, which is not fully professional, so he fails and he does not have enough significant coverage to pass Deletion of Abeiku Adams WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4340 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Judaism (2nd nomination) User:Basket 18:51, 9 May 2010 (UTC) delete This article is a perfect example of , and . I strongly urge it's deletion, even considering a speedy deletion Deletion of Criticism of Judaism (2nd nomination) WP:SYNTH||WP:COAT||WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4341 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaminade College School User:Cunard 06:55, 15 May 2010 (UTC) keep per the arguments outlined in the essay . All high schools are notable. This school has received sufficient coverage in reliable sources to verify the information Deletion of Chaminade College School WP:NHS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4342 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scot and Maurine Proctor User:Dennisthe2 16:06, 1 March 2010 (UTC) delete Sources available do not convey notability of this couple. This said, regardless of the pairing, I'm thinking that, once they attain |notability, they should each have an article that stands up to our standards Deletion of Scot and Maurine Proctor WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +4343 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mario Party 10 User:Sergecross73 15:07, 7 August 2012 (UTC) delete Per / G3. The game hasn't been announced, and this isn't even one of those titles where there have been well circulated rumors or leaks or anything. It's all completely made up Deletion of Mario Party 10 WP:HOAX||WP:CSD Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes 40 +4344 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Civilian perspectives on media freedom User:Dennisthe2 16:44, 26 April 2012 (UTC) delete We are |not for essays Deletion of Civilian perspectives on media freedom WP:NOTESSAY Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4345 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Middleton Fox User:Missvain 21:27, 4 June 2021 (UTC) delete Fails GNG after my research and delete per Deletion of Samuel Middleton Fox WP:NOTGENEALOGY Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4346 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tilly Keeper User:AnemoneProjectors 09:47, 22 April 2016 (UTC) delete actually having read some of the other comments, I realise she fails as the sources are discussing the character rather than the actress. If she passes GNG and ENT in the future, the article can be written then Deletion of Tilly Keeper WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4347 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Konwarpurar Konwar User:Rameshnta909 18:21, 16 December 2016 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Konwarpurar Konwar WP:MOVIE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4348 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Herring (businessman) User:RightCowLeftCoast 05:46, 12 March 2013 (UTC) delete multiple mentions in non-primary |reliable sources, however added together I do not believe they add up to |significant coverage of the subject. Furthermore, although Wealth TV is notable, |that doesn't mean the subject of this AfD is notable. Therefore, failing or , the proper course of action is deletion. As a compromise, I can agree to changing the article to a redirect to Wealth TV Deletion of Robert Herring (businessman) WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4349 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Place of power User:DrFleischman 19:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC) delete """Just because a handful to reliable sources use the same combination of three words doesn't mean they're referring to the same thing (i.e. subject). There is no evidence that """"place of power"""" as used across these sources is anything other than a phrase. As such, I agree with {{u|JudeccaXIII}} that applies, and in particular . Since I don't believe we have any reliable sources covering the social or historical significance of the phrase """"place of power,"""" I do not believe it is sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. (I'm not watching this page so please ping me if you want my attention""" Deletion of Place of power WP:NAD||WP:WORDISSUBJECT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +4350 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trenseta User:Bubba 11:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC) delete ndash; |unverifiable. Can only find blogs and boards Deletion of Trenseta :WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4351 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whiteness theory user:Andrew 10:43, 25 January 2019 (UTC) keep See the ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=S8Kf0N0XALIC&oi=fnd&pg=PG1007#v=onepage&q&f=false Encyclopedia of Communication Theory''. Per , we should improve the page, not delete it Deletion of Whiteness theory WP:IMPERFECT Wikipedia:Editing policy 24 +4352 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alertsec Xpress User:Pohta 15:44, 11 January 2010 (UTC) delete Obvious spam, and the sources don't meet . It gets exactly one google news hit, a mention in passing http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=Alertsec+Xpress+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-press%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&btnG=Search+Archives&scoring=a here Deletion of Alertsec Xpress WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4353 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Italy–North Korea relations User:Colapeninsula 11:03, 16 March 2012 (UTC) merge with relevant foreign relations of X article. It only describes a single event, the opening of diplomatic relations, and it seems to fail . If more happens in the way of I-NK relations, then that would merit its own article Deletion of Italy–North Korea relations WP:EVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4354 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francesca Hogi (2nd nomination) User:Jclemens 22:20, 19 April 2013 (UTC) merge """and merge if anything worthwhile is appropriately sourced. The """"delete"""" !votes above run afoul of because they fail to detail ''why'' her article should be deleted when a reasonable and appropriate merge target exists""" Deletion of Francesca Hogi (2nd nomination) WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +4355 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Los Baby's [[User_talk:Travellingcari|TravellingCari]] 02:30, 8 October 2008 (UTC) keep I read Spanish and the article there establishes notability. It needs translation which I could do, but have no time at this moment. Also keep on the grounds that Chubbles does good work with music/band related articles - s/he has a good track record with these articles and I |don't believe s/he'd go to trouble of creating an article on a n-n band Deletion of Los Baby's WP:AGF Wikipedia:Assume good faith 53 +4356 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enomalism User:Red 11:45, 31 August 2008 (UTC) delete as '''G11'', confilct of intrest (pointed out in the nom), and non-notable. Basiclly, |spam Deletion of Enomalism WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Spam 26 +4357 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Govt Elementary School Kantrila User:Ammarpad 19:04, 6 December 2017 (UTC) delete It is high schools that are ''presumed'' notable if they have some sources not primary or middle and whatnot. Utterly non notable. No independent sources. It only exists and ≠N|existence is not notability Deletion of Govt Elementary School Kantrila WP:E Wikipedia:Editing policy 24 +4358 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chakra (operating system) User:Gaba_p 22:40, 26 September 2013 (UTC) keep given its presence in a number of . I'll add one more to the list: http://www.muylinux.com/2013/02/14/chakra-linux-2013-02-llega-con-kde-sc-4-10/ MuyLinux (a very big Linux site in Spanish) Regards Deletion of Chakra (operating system) WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4359 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Last of us (film) User:Arxiloxos 19:39, 14 November 2014 (UTC) merge to ''The Last of Us'', where the in-development film is already discussed. As Google and GNews searches will bear out, the project is receiving coverage, such as http://www.forbes.com/sites/insertcoin/2014/07/27/naughty-dog-wants-game-of-thrones-actress-for-the-last-of-us-movie/http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/08/11/parts-of-the-last-of-us-movie-to-be-quite-different-to-the-gamehttp://variety.com/2014/film/news/screen-gems-to-distribute-feature-version-of-ps3-game-last-of-us-1201126996/, but I don't see that anything has happened yet that makes a separate article appropriate per Deletion of The Last of us (film) WP:NFF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4360 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reenie Mansata User:Jamez42 00:54, 30 June 2018 (UTC) delete Fails and notability guidelines Deletion of Reenie Mansata WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4361 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinder's User:JFHJr 19:15, 29 September 2012 (UTC) delete Fails due to lack of |reliable sources that give any measure of in coverage. The multiple mentions show the company exists and has changed hands, but little more Deletion of Kinder's WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4362 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/5 Days: How I Survived Hurricane Katrina User:Armbrust 00:35, 2 February 2010 (UTC) delete as of Deletion of 5 Days: How I Survived Hurricane Katrina WP:SELFPUBLISH Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4363 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Kingdom 2030 FIFA World Cup bid User:Number 11:03, 20 June 2018 (UTC) delete per Deletion of United Kingdom 2030 FIFA World Cup bid WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +4364 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1692 Subbotina (2nd nomination) User:Praemonitus 20:21, 26 April 2015 (UTC) merge per . All I found are data entries with no substantial coverage Deletion of 1692 Subbotina (2nd nomination) WP:DWMP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4365 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Presidents of the United States with facial hair (2nd nomination) User:SSTflyer 09:54, 26 September 2016 (UTC) keep Meets as a group that has been discussed in-depth by reliable sources Deletion of List of Presidents of the United States with facial hair (2nd nomination) WP:LISTN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4366 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talent Zoo User:Wine 22:04, 27 July 2006 (UTC) keep It looks like this has been cleaned up since the nom, and it |verifiably passes Deletion of Talent Zoo WP:V||WP:WEB Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4367 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oh Paris (EP) User:Esradekan 00:32, 1 October 2008 (UTC) delete article fails to establish notability as per Deletion of Oh Paris (EP) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4368 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peddy D User:J04n 20:25, 14 September 2010 (UTC) delete unable to find any reliable sources independent of the subject. Does not meet or Deletion of Peddy D WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4369 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colombia–Cyprus relations User:Edison 19:36, 1 May 2009 (UTC) delete Fails and OT|not a directory. Foreign relations of the 203 sovereign countries are best discussed in the article about the country, or a standalone article if a major country, rather than in 20,000 such binary stubs. A link to the country's foreign ministry website will provide more up-to-date info than a robostub created and then neglected Deletion of Colombia–Cyprus relations WP:N||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4370 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hello Beautiful User:Michig 21:23, 24 September 2008 (UTC) keep Hello Beautiful and merge the other 2 into it. Just passes based on coverage already identified in the article and these: http://www.punktv.ca/?c=105&a=3567, http://www.indiesolo.com/artists/HelloBeautiful/interview.htm, http://www.soundproofmagazine.com/Canada/Albums/index.html?show=full, and current national tour appears to be verifiable Deletion of Hello Beautiful WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4371 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corporate Representatives for Ethical Wikipedia Engagement User:Gobonobo 23:28, 12 March 2012 (UTC) delete While reliable sources mention CREWE in passing, the coverage is not significant and is insufficient to pass the |general notability guideline. I wonder if some of this shouldn't be merged to the Edelman (firm) article, since this effort seems to be coming from Mr. Gomes' company Deletion of Corporate Representatives for Ethical Wikipedia Engagement WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4372 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sammy Jayne User:Stifle 18:21, 14 May 2008 (UTC) delete As there are no |reliable sources |cited, I am persuaded that the article does not comply with the |verifiability policy Deletion of Sammy Jayne WP:RS||WP:CITE||WP:V Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4373 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aanchal Bhatia User:K 01:43, 27 June 2018 (UTC) delete does not meet / . Promotional Deletion of Aanchal Bhatia WP:ANYBIO||WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4374 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra de Helen User:NeemNarduni2 22:50, 6 February 2016 (UTC) delete per nomination, no indication of notability per Deletion of Sandra de Helen WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4375 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Falls Police Department User:Jayron32 04:45, 19 February 2008 (UTC) delete The information can easily be incorporated into an article on the town. I see nothing to indicate this is a notable police department per all the relevent guidlines etc Deletion of Great Falls Police Department WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4376 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berat Çetinkaya User:GiantSnowman 09:13, 20 June 2013 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Berat Çetinkaya WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4377 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamisama Kazoku User:Knowledgekid87 21:57, 28 July 2014 (UTC) keep per Farix's reference findings. You might want to read before nominating things for deletion Deletion of Kamisama Kazoku WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +4378 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mega Society User:Arthur 17:49, 18 July 2006 (UTC) delete I'm a member of Mensa internation|Mensa, and I haven't heard of it. (By the way, Omni (magazine)|Omni is not a |reliable source of anything.) If the information (presently) in the article can be verified by (burden of proof on the article writers, of course; it's difficult to prove a negative), '''Merge''' to High IQ Society. &mdash Deletion of Mega Society WP:RS||WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4379 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bachelor in Homoeopathic Medicine & Surgery User:Wikicology 02:17, 18 May 2015 (UTC) delete Sadly, no evidence of |notability Deletion of Bachelor in Homoeopathic Medicine & Surgery WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4380 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of the Members User:Stifle 23:29, 3 April 2006 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Church of the Members WP:BALLS Wikipedia:Complete bollocks 62 +4381 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarathi International User:Nileena 11:01, 18 January 2007 (UTC) delete as per Deletion of Sarathi International WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4382 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rose Kabuye User:Julius 16:07, 12 November 2008 (UTC) keep Her arrest has been widely covered by the international press. does not apply, when she is notable for two events: 1. Assassination of Habyarimana and Ntaryamira in 1994, 2. The arrest of Rose Kabuye in 2008. While the latter is related to the former, given the new diplomatic row between Rwanda and and Germany, the latter is by certainty a major event of its own. The article already has acceptable amount of content and is expandable. I would also point out that the article was nominated for deletion four minutes after it was created! It is impossible to figure out non-notability in such a short timespan, particularly given the huge number of ghits for a Rwandan person Deletion of Rose Kabuye WP:ONEEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4383 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sohini Sengupta User:Abecedare 07:05, 23 March 2015 (UTC) keep The article needs clean-up, minor copyediting, more and better sources etc, but the notability of the subject is not in doubt. Two national level awards, Sangeet Natak Akademi's ''Ustad Bismillah Khan Yuva Puraskar'' (http://www.sangeetnatak.gov.in/sna/yuva2007.htm verification) and the 2011 National Film Award for Best Supporting Actress (http://iffi.nic.in/Dff2011/Frm47NFAAward.aspx verification; p. 30 as Sohini Haldar), themselves attest to notable contribution to theater and film respectively, and thus suffice to establish notability under standard Deletion of Sohini Sengupta WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4384 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chase Koch User:Ddcm8991 19:51, 12 April 2016 (UTC) delete per . Subjects fails notability guidelines per and Deletion of Chase Koch WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO||WP:42 Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +4385 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grady W. White User:Bearcat 19:12, 20 June 2018 (UTC) delete Melbourne FL is not large enough to hand all of its mayors an automatic free pass over #2 just for existing, but this is sourced nowhere near well enough to actually get him over the bar Deletion of Grady W. White WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4386 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amel bouchoucha User:JohnCD 16:48, 8 August 2010 (UTC) delete not enough to meet or Deletion of Amel bouchoucha WP:MUSICBIO||WP:ENTERTAINER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4387 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Little Soap and Water User:Colonel 17:53, 23 December 2010 (UTC) keep The sources provided demonstrate that the article passes both and Deletion of A Little Soap and Water WP:V||WP:N Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4388 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot Rod Girls Save The World User:Mr 00:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC) delete Non-notable indie film, no awards, no film festival screenings, no IMDB entry, and most importantly, no |non-trivial third party sources Deletion of Hot Rod Girls Save The World WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4389 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black coin User:Starblind 22:19, 27 July 2013 (UTC) delete either a hoax or something at the bar one day Deletion of Black coin WP:MADEUP Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +4390 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theatre, Club and Arena Tour User:Escape_Orbit 16:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC) delete Fails . Possibly may yet pass it at some point, but not yet Deletion of Theatre, Club and Arena Tour WP:NMUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4391 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Constantine Alexios of Greece and Denmark (3rd nomination) User:VocalIndia 10:17, 31 August 2020 (UTC) keep I gave delete on the deletion requests for many royalty spam articles, but this one is different. First of all, being a member of a deposed royal family with enough multiple reliable sources and some sources in Greece grants . Second of all, he is also the future head of the deposed Greek royal family and is referenced in reliable sources Deletion of Prince Constantine Alexios of Greece and Denmark (3rd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4392 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas Junior College Student Government Association User:Orangemike 19:57, 13 March 2008 (UTC) delete non-notable; fails Deletion of Texas Junior College Student Government Association :WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4393 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shit sandwich User:Haemo 02:52, 15 May 2007 (UTC) delete Wikipedia is |not a slang usage guide, or a compendium of instances where slang has occurred in popular culture Deletion of Shit sandwich WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4394 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jens Erik Gould User:Jmertel23 18:49, 11 December 2018 (UTC) delete I can't find any independent, reliable sources with significant coverage. Therefore, the subject fails ; he is simply not notable enough to warrant an article Deletion of Jens Erik Gould WP:NBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4395 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chase McLaughlin User:Eagles247 17:14, 2 October 2019 (UTC) keep when he passes this Sunday as the Chargers' new kicker (signed to the active roster today Deletion of Chase McLaughlin WP:NGRIDIRON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4396 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enjoy The Zoo User:J04n 01:26, 11 November 2009 (UTC) delete Can find no coverage from a , WBUZ (FM) is a local Nashville (actually LaVergne) station, it can be heard over the internet nationwide but so can just about any station. Can find nothing else that would support Deletion of Enjoy The Zoo WP:RS||WP:BAND Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4397 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinay Deolalikar User:Personman 19:00, 10 August 2010 (UTC) keep He seems trivially notable under . There are multiple traditional news articles, as has been pointed out, and even if the proof is flawed it is generally acknowledged that much of the work in it is good and will contribute to other results in the field. (For one example of this see issue #4 https://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2010/08/09/issues-in-the-proof-that-p%E2%89%A0np/ here Deletion of Vinay Deolalikar WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4398 """Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/""""Carl Dundas""""""" User:Mendaliv 16:47, 6 September 2008 (UTC) delete this is pretty clearly just an |autobio of a |non-notable person. Also, we know for sure that {{user|Tartansoxdundas}} ''is'' the subject, considering the OTRS confirmation on :Image:Carl Dundas.JPG. I'd say speedy, but it looks like there's an assertion in there... &mdash """Deletion of """"Carl Dundas""""""" WP:AB||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Autobiography 75 +4399 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of northernmost items (2nd nomination) User:Mangoe 13:30, 23 April 2019 (UTC) delete Looking at citations at random, for the most part they do not actually say, independently, that the thing in question is the northernmost, making this a huge fest. I'm not sure how many of those that do are telling the truth. And besides, most of it is trivia. Let Guinness handle this one Deletion of List of northernmost items (2nd nomination) WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4400 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alyssa Carson (2nd nomination) User:Xxanthippe 00:02, 30 June 2020 (UTC) delete No significant improvement since last time. Certainly no pass of rof and sources are too flimsy, exaggerated and promotional for . Still no significant achievements to her name that would warrant notice by Wikipedia Deletion of Alyssa Carson (2nd nomination) WP:P||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Portal 50 +4401 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Brothahood User:ShadowHalo 21:54, 16 December 2006 (UTC) delete Fails , very weak assertion of notability Deletion of The Brothahood WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4402 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of women with very long hair User:Crystallina 03:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC) delete Wikipedia is not |an indiscriminate collection of information Deletion of List of women with very long hair WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4403 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JB & the gang User:Dissolve 06:36, 8 August 2007 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of JB & the gang WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4404 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Levinson ML-3 User:Inkpaduta 15:53, 8 February 2007 (UTC) comment """Photographs exist of a great many things that are not notable ebough for Wikipedia articles. Wikipedia's notability policy and reliable source policy require that something has been the subject of multiple nontrivial coverage in independent and reliable sources. The fansite listing equipment made by the company is neither of those. """"IT IS HARMLESS"""" is not a valid reason for keeping an article about a piece of audio eequipment if it was not notable in its time. Perhaps someone can dig up a couple of reviews in an audio magazines from the days when it was for sale. That would help. Otherwise the articlew should be deleted""" Deletion of Mark Levinson ML-3 WP:N||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4405 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of narrative forms User:Cybercobra 09:13, 7 October 2009 (UTC) keep Meets with the editing that happened subsequent to my previous vote Deletion of List of narrative forms WP:HEY Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard 85 +4406 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plus (band) User:Atlantic306 22:58, 31 May 2020 (UTC) keep as passes criteria 2 of with albums and singles placed on a national chart, namely Oricon, imv Deletion of Plus (band) WP:NMUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4407 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Echenique User:Namiba 16:33, 3 July 2020 (UTC) keep passes having played at the highest international level Deletion of José Echenique WP:SPORTCRIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4408 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UrbanClap (3rd nomination) User:Cunard 04:16, 11 October 2016 (UTC) keep """The articles provided by {{user|Northamerica1000}} clearly demonstrate that the subject passes Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. For example, here is coverage from the ''First Post'' article: Roommates at IIT, Varun Khaitan and Abhiraj Bhal, had always wanted to solve a really big consumer problem in India by leveraging mobile technology. After graduating from IIT, Abhiraj went on to IIM Ahmedabad, while Varun joined Qualcomm as an engineer. Eventually, they both joined the Boston Consulting Group. While in the US, a common friend introduced them to Raghav Chandra, an engineer at Twitter who shared their vision.After returning to India, the three realised that the industry of local services had seen no innovation for at least a decade, and decided to focus on solving this problem. UrbanClap was launched in November 2014, in a tiny office at Bhikaji Cama Place in South Delhi, offering services in 5 categories and with 100 partners on board.The organisation grew rapidly as the team grew from 3 to 35 odd members and, by April 2015 UrbanClap raised $1.6 million in the seed round of funding, from SAIF Partners, Accel Partners and the founders of Snapdeal, Kunal Bahl and Rohit Bansal. At the time, the service offering had grown to 46 categories and 2000+ professionals were registered on its platform.Barely two months later, as UrbanClap expanded to other metropolitan cities in India, the company raised another $10 million, in Series A funding from its existing investors­ SAIF and Accel Partners. This discusses UrbanClap's foundation, history, and products in detail.The article from ''Entrepreneur (magazine)|Entrepreneur'' notes: Brainchild of IIT Kanpur alumni Varun Khaitan and Abhiraj Bhal, UrbanClap claims itself as the India’s largest marketplace for local services. Whether you are looking for a plumber, beautician, a yoga trainer or a wedding photographer, UrbanClap is a one stop destination for all local services.All you need to do is place your requirements on the UrbanClap app or website and within short span of time platform will bring these professionals to you.Headquartered in Gurgaon, this startup offers services in more than 75 categories across Delhi NCR, Bengaluru, Mumbai, Chennai and Pune. Today, they serve 5000 customer requests per day, and have built a base of over 20,000 service professionals – who together represent the gold standard for trusted services in India.Every month, UrbanClap sends them business worth $200 million annually (current run rate) which include Rs 200 from small carpentry jobs, to a large interior designing assignments worth several lakhs. This provides extensive coverage of UrbanClap's product. is clearly met.I reviewed the current text of the article and do not find it promotional: '''UrbanClap''' is an India|Indian online service marketplace that connects customers to service professionals. The company was founded in 2014 and is is based out of Gurgaon, India. In December 2015, UrbanClap was servicing 5,000 requests from customers per day, and had a """"base of over 20,000 service professionals"""" who provide labor for UrbanClap's users.As of 2016, UrbanClap has raised $37 million in funding from Bessemer Venture Partners, Accel Partners, SAIF Partners, Kunal Bahl, Rohit Bansal, and Ratan Tata.UrbanClap acquired HandyHome, a Mumbai-based after sales service platform in January 2016""" Deletion of UrbanClap (3rd nomination) WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4409 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triggerslip User:Tnxman307 18:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC) delete the way it stands. If the Entertainment Weekly|EW article does exist, it could be cited, but until then, does not meet Deletion of Triggerslip WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4410 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jared Martinelli User:Sir 21:50, 27 April 2014 (UTC) delete none of them have played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning all these articles fail and . Additionally, none of them meet either Deletion of Jared Martinelli WP:NSPORT||WP:GNG||WP:COLLATH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4411 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second Robotech War User:Sephiroth 04:28, 3 March 2009 (UTC) delete pretty blatant failure of #PLOT. No notability asserted either through any sources independent of the topic Deletion of Second Robotech War WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4412 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minami Minegishi User:Michitaro 23:23, 10 November 2012 (UTC) keep I have expanded the article by adding three more Japanese references from different sources, all national sports newspapers: Sponichi, Nikkan Sports, and Sports Hochi. All have her name in the article title and all are focused on her various activities. With the other English references I added, I believe this is sufficient to pass Deletion of Minami Minegishi WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4413 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katarzyna Dolinska (3rd nomination) User:Misty 17:18, 9 April 2009 (UTC) keep Ranking on ANTM should not matter, a person is no more notable for being on the show is they rank 3rd than 5th. As a model, Katarzyna has a much higher notability than most other Top Model contestants, who articles, including some of the winners. She certainly is more notable than Heather Kuzmich, who also ranked 5th, but was voted over whelmingly to keep. If Katarzyna doesn't meet , than only Adrianne Curry, Kim Stolz and maybe 2 or 3 others do Deletion of Katarzyna Dolinska (3rd nomination) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4414 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Culver User:Niteshift36 09:15, 12 June 2009 (UTC) delete Not notable at all. Fails Deletion of Jonathan Culver WP:CREATIVE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4415 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Yaniv genital waxing case User:Simonm223 12:16, 5 August 2019 (UTC) delete per and as this is not a notable event - and is one involving a BLP. Furthermore, it's a to circumvent the consensus at British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal and /N that the subject ''should not be named'' which makes this whole article a violation of Deletion of Jessica Yaniv genital waxing case WP:BLP||WP:EVENTCRIT||WP:POVFORK||WP:BLP||WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +4416 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artificial General Intelligence Research Institute User:Cewbot 00:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC) comment This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for |lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be '''eligible for |soft deletion''' at the end of its 7-day listing Deletion of Artificial General Intelligence Research Institute WP:NOQUORUM||WP:SOFTDELETE Wikipedia:Deletion process 72 +4417 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sutcliffe Jügend User:Samat 00:38, 12 June 2021 (UTC) delete it Fails & , Not enough significant coverege on NO evidence of Notability Deletion of Sutcliffe Jügend WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4418 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halloweentown: She's the Witch User:FisherQueen 20:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC) delete It doesn't seem to have been through AfD before, so db-repost doesn't apply, but delete nevertheless per , with no prejudice against recreation when and if there is something to say on the subject Deletion of Halloweentown: She's the Witch WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4419 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Rubik's Cube software User:Sebwite 01:54, 23 September 2008 (UTC) delete per , but first move whatever is notable to Rubik's Cube Deletion of List of Rubik's Cube software WP:NOTDIR Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4420 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaun Xavier NONE NONE delete Fails . Google search did not yield any positive results and IMDb page http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4915448/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm does not credit any movies Deletion of Shaun Xavier WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4421 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Melrose Place (2009 TV series) characters User:Jclemens 02:57, 19 July 2010 (UTC) keep """as PROD decliner. If you look at the List of Melrose Place characters, two things are obvious: 1) this content is primarily unique, and 2) this article is a |summary style breakout of that parent character list. It might be reasonable to merge this content back into the parent article, since """"list of X characters"""" articles seem to generally ignore , just like it might be reasonable to trim the content... but both are editorial decisions and don't need AfD""" Deletion of List of Melrose Place (2009 TV series) characters WP:SS||WP:LENGTH Wikipedia:Summary style 23 +4422 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastern Hungarian Kingdom User:Wizardman 17:24, 14 January 2007 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Eastern Hungarian Kingdom WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4423 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portable Nintendo System (2009) User:MuZemike 08:24, 29 August 2008 (UTC) delete with the user refusing to indicate any sources whatsoever, it gives me reason to believe that this is complete Deletion of Portable Nintendo System (2009) WP:BOLLOCKS Wikipedia:Complete bollocks 62 +4424 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surch User:Wafulz 07:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC) delete per and , and from the link the nom gave, there's a fair amount of |crystal balling too. Additionally, there is only one http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=link%3AfuZzxybEowwJ%3Awww.surch.com%2F&btnG=Google+Search&meta= external link to the site Deletion of Surch WP:WEB||WP:V||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4425 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darryl Buchanan User:Bearian 17:40, 26 January 2021 (UTC) delete per above, and particularly failing and . Flint is not so large a city that its city council members are automatically notable, and |the coverage he's had is entirely local Deletion of Darryl Buchanan WP:NPOL||WP:POLOUTCOMES||WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4426 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brogan Hay User:BabbaQ 17:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC) keep per Deletion of Brogan Hay WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4427 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sephardic Pizmonim Project (3rd nomination) User:Leuko 20:53, 8 August 2007 (UTC) delete Not enough to satisfy the primary criterion of to write a , POV article Deletion of Sephardic Pizmonim Project (3rd nomination) WP:RS||WP:N||WP:V||WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4428 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Nadadur Janardhan User:Aymatth2 20:04, 5 August 2009 (UTC) delete I took the time to work through all the references. They show that he worked for the UN for some years as a regional advisor on e-commerce. In this capacity, he sat on various committees and working groups, and spoke at several conferences. He contributed to a UN publication on e-commerce. He has founded a company that provides software and consulting on e-commerce, and continues to speak at conferences. None of this seems enough to establish notability according to guidelines. There is no strong evidence of significant work, honors or even wide respect by his peers Deletion of Dr Nadadur Janardhan WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4429 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crescent Electric Supply Co. User:Patar 21:36, 17 September 2018 (UTC) delete per my comments at the Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2018 September 11|DRV. All or or almost all of Cunard's sources except for the BusinessWeek article either fail to meet the depth requirements at for only containing directory-like, routine information about the company or the independence requirements at , which specifically warns against using trade magazines. What is left is insufficient to meet to meet Deletion of Crescent Electric Supply Co. WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:COPRIND||WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4430 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wayan Blue User:PJM 19:29, 25 January 2006 (UTC) delete per , based on what I findhttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Wayan+Blue&btnG=Google+Search. The article does make an assertion (co-managing Spun Records & a CD released with 'other artists'), so I don't see it as being eligible for a speedy Deletion of Wayan Blue WP:NMG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4431 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afghan Television Voice of Christ User:Mrschimpf 02:09, 5 April 2020 (UTC) delete Another tele-preacher who clearly going by the nation's religious makeup, has paid to get their imported shows on TV in the region but probably has little to no viewership; definitely unfound here Deletion of Afghan Television Voice of Christ WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4432 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wade Load User:NickPenguin 21:22, 1 January 2008 (UTC) merge all non-major characters to List of Kim Possible characters, clearly. AfD is not a replacement for foresight and |being bold Deletion of Wade Load WP:BOLD Wikipedia:Be bold 78 +4433 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In the Mix (Pink album) User:Bearian 21:11, 24 November 2009 (UTC) delete both per , this is not notable even as remixes and bootlegs go Deletion of In the Mix (Pink album) WP:NALBUMS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4434 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samantha Smith (actress) User:Tomwsulcer 11:53, 10 August 2014 (UTC) comment """There may be an issue with her name being so common (sometimes it is even """"Sam Smith"""" which is even more common). When I googled this search string -- (""""samantha smith"""") -Maine -plane -crash -Andropov -Soviet (actress OR winchester OR paranormal OR supernatural) -- and https://www.google.com/search?q=(%22samantha+smith%22)+-Maine+-plane+-crash+-Andropov+-Soviet+(actress+OR+winchester+OR+paranormal+OR+supernatural)&espv=2&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=51vnU_DnH5PisATekoGQDA&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAThG&biw=1086&bih=862 perused the photos, it was not clear to me exactly who was the ''real'' Samantha Smith, like there are at least two different actresses with the name Samantha Smith. If the photos are all of the same person, ie Samantha Smith the actress, then when she is sometimes blonde, sometimes brunette, with different looks, (needed obviously to play different roles) well it is somewhat difficult to ascertain with certainty exactly who is ''the'' Samantha Smith. Is it http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/bKHDDdBCuQP/Rage+Official+Launch+Party+Inside/UotnvpctMF_/Samantha+Smith this person? Or http://www.therisinghollywood.com/2011/11/22/rising-actress-samantha-smith/ this person? Or http://www.supernaturalwiki.com/index.php?title=Samantha_Smith this person? Or http://www.samanthasmith.co.uk/ this person? If we look at http://www.gettyimages.com/editorial/samantha-smith---actress-pictures Getty images, seems like there are two different persons. That said, using the best search string I could concoct, after searching 10 SERP pages, I did not see much in the way of multiple independent reliable nontrivial sources as required by the although it may be there was so much fan cruft that it needs somebody to search through perhaps another 10 to 20 SERP pages. Or, maybe she is a character actor who somewhat flies under the radar of name recognition""" Deletion of Samantha Smith (actress) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4435 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Concepcion User:PRehse 13:56, 23 April 2019 (UTC) delete Does not meet either or Deletion of Martin Concepcion WP:NBOX||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4436 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eveda User:Eveda 17:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC) delete WP:V|Verifiable |notability comes before Wikipedia article, not the other way around (particularly when there are POV and issues too Deletion of Eveda WP:N||WP:NPOV||WP:COI Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4437 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iran at the 2016 Asian Beach Games User:Comatmebro 16:13, 2 October 2016 (UTC) delete Could not locate third-party coverage of this specific country in the Asia Beach games. Per nom, fails and should be deleted Deletion of Iran at the 2016 Asian Beach Games WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4438 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inspiration developer User:Huon 02:06, 7 May 2015 (UTC) delete a mix of |original research and a non-notable |neologism Deletion of Inspiration developer WP:NOR||WP:NEO Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4439 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Digits [[User: RJaguar3|u]] | [[User Talk:RJaguar3|t]]''' 03:04, 13 April 2010 (UTC) delete no indication of existence of any |reliable sources to |verify the article's content, also |notability issues with a single pricing game that hasn't been played in 37 years. '''RJaguar3 | Deletion of Double Digits WP:RS||WP:V||WP:N Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4440 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Books associated with Oxford User:Becksguy 09:09, 16 August 2007 (UTC) keep as per Jonathan Bowen and . Develop as per Bduke above. If Oxford University Press|OUP isn't the single most important English language university press in the world, especially in the scholarly field, it's damn close to it. It's aura practically confers notability on anything associated with it, including this article. And it isn't just OUP, it's the literary associations of the town. Also, it's not about the completeness of the list, that's not a reason to delete. After all, Wikipedia isn't complete. I just don't see this as tenuous or indiscriminate, they are tied together because of their association with Oxford. The article does need more work, but compare it now from when it was started Deletion of Books associated with Oxford WP:HEY Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard 85 +4441 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridget Murphy Kennedy User:Armbrust 18:09, 26 September 2010 (UTC) delete per |A7, there is no indication of notability. Being a relative of notable persons does not make her notable per Deletion of Bridget Murphy Kennedy WP:A7||WP:NOTINHERITED Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +4442 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winter (Starbucks) User:FreeRangeFrog 04:33, 28 December 2012 (UTC) delete The notability guidelines are intended to serve as a guideline to establish whether or not an article about a subject merits inclusion in the encyclopedia. They're not a web coverage counter. This to me is trivial and pointless, and can easily be construed as failing Deletion of Winter (Starbucks) WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +4443 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Wainer User:Artene50 10:23, 4 July 2008 (UTC) delete per and Deletion of Michael Wainer WP:BAND||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4444 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot dog club User:SpacemanSpiff 07:15, 20 July 2009 (UTC) delete per and hoping we get a snowfall, if not a new . -SpacemanSpiff Deletion of Hot dog club WP:NFT||WP:CSD Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +4445 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nattasha Nauljam User:Northamerica1000 06:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC) delete Not finding significant coverage in reliable sources for the subject. Appears to not meet for a Wikipedia article Deletion of Nattasha Nauljam WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4446 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ghost (Faroese band) User:AJHingston 09:32, 30 May 2011 (UTC) keep I think otability (local interests) comes into play here. For those who don't understand why see Faroe Islands. Being a large fish in a small pond (I'm sorry if that English expression confuses) can, and should, confer the notability Wikipeida demands, and they have established some interest internationally Deletion of The Ghost (Faroese band) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4447 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comikey user:Hellknowz 09:41, 17 July 2021 (UTC) delete as a non-notable company failing and with no reliable independent in-depth sources (at least what English search returns and what is listed above). The given sources are not GNG-compatible and are only briefly paraphrasing press releases and official and routine material. Possibly , but these sort of companies rarely receive in-depth coverage. —   Deletion of Comikey WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4448 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic State of Iraq and Syria User:RJFF 20:19, 10 January 2014 (UTC) delete """This is premature. We do not know how long ISIL will be able to keep control over this territory and if they will be able to establish some degree of ''de facto'' state order. Wikipedia is not a news platform. It should be up to date, but creating an article about a purported """"state"""" that has only existed for a few days so far is an example of ecentism, which we should avoid. For now, it is completely sufficient if the article on the group mentions the declaration of independence and the current territorial control. The article about ISIL """"state"""" lacks (and will continue to lack) information on essential features that define a state, like geography and demographics, because it has no defined borders (not even ''de facto'' borders), because it will expand or shrink or otherwise change its shape depending on the moving frontlines between ISIL group and its enemies in the ongoing war. Conclusion: this """"state"""" lacks a defined territory, a definded people and we do not know yet if it has any kind of state order (unlike e.g. the aforementioned Somaliland, which has a defined territory, people and ''de facto'' state order""" Deletion of Islamic State of Iraq and Syria WP:R Wikipedia:Redirect 73 +4449 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha Dalal User:Pharaoh 01:26, 5 September 2021 (UTC) delete fails a non notable fashion designer Deletion of Natasha Dalal WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4450 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Chiminski User:Doggy54321 21:59, 19 February 2021 (UTC) delete all those sources are about the company, not the person. Deletion of John Chiminski WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4451 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sing sing slammer User:Niteshift36 03:14, 11 June 2009 (UTC) delete if possible, if not, fails miserably Deletion of Sing sing slammer WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4452 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darwin kummins User:Arendedwinter 09:03, 24 October 2007 (UTC) delete Per above and also author admitted it's |made-up Deletion of Darwin kummins WP:MADEUP Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +4453 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deji Falope (Television Host) User:Persian 21:51, 22 November 2006 (UTC) delete a promo article that lacks the requirements Deletion of Deji Falope (Television Host) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4454 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of wars between democracies User:Robofish 00:55, 19 July 2010 (UTC) merge to Democratic peace theory, or '''Delete'''. This article seems to have and issues; at the very least, it should be renamed to List of alleged wars between democracies, as the inclusion of some or all of the conflicts here is contentious. Preferably though, it should be merged into Democratic peace theory as a list of alleged counterexamples, but only the parts that are sufficiently referenced as such Deletion of List of wars between democracies WP:POV||WP:SYNTH Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +4455 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mule (slang) User:BillC 00:27, 2 May 2006 (UTC) comment """It's not even in Urban Dictionary. You can add it there if you like, though you should understand that that action would make no difference to this debate, as Wikipedia does not recognise Urban Dictionary as a |reliable source. If you want to save this entry, what is required is some well-sourced usages: is a syndicated columist using it in a respected newspaper, for example? If, as someone on this page has claimed, it is a word or sign that """"only hundreds know"""", forget it, it's neither |notable, OT|encyclopaedic nor |reliably sourced""" Deletion of Mule (slang) WP:RS||WP:N||WP:NOT||WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4456 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alien (software) User:Mark 21:02, 10 May 2013 (UTC) keep There is a modest http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/alien-use-any-package-any-distribution Linux Journal article on the software and it pops up on commercial howto sites like http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/ubuntu/install-an-rpm-package-on-ubuntu-linux/ How-To Geek. Debian uses it to Linux Standard Base#Limitations on Debian|help improve conformance to the Linux Standard Base. http://www.tldp.org/LDP/www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ch11.en.html#_miscellaneous_data_conversion The Linux Documentation Project has an entry for the software. Joy and Grandmartin11 have shown that there are thousands of GBook hits for the software. Between the LJ article, which I consider marginally in depth, some shorter articles on commercial howto sites and thousands of citations in books, I consider the software notable. In my opinion, in judging notability allows for many small references in RS like books to substitute for an in-depth one: ''The number and nature of reliable sources needed varies depending on the depth of coverage and quality of the sources. Multiple sources are generally expected.'' There seems to be enough secondary material out there to support a modest article. With a notable topic and no major problems in the article, I recommend keeping the article Deletion of Alien (software) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4457 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Belial's Key User:AmitDeshwar 01:00, 26 September 2006 (UTC) keep per Prolog and others above. Seems clearly to pass Deletion of Grand Belial's Key WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4458 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyoncé's untitled third studio album User:Jasynnash2 11:20, 11 September 2008 (UTC) delete title or not it isn't notable, hasn't come out (and may not ever come out despite what is currently said). Clearly fails . Billboard reference means including it in the artist's article is reasonable but, on its own really doesn't support a separate article Deletion of Beyoncé's untitled third studio album WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4459 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ctrl+Alt+Del (webcomic) (2nd nomination) [[User_talk:Radiant!|>Radiant<]] 15:42, 19 February 2011 (UTC) delete No reliable sources means no article; all sources that I've found are either trivial mentions, or self-promotion by the comic's author. That several people express |liking the comic is no grounds for it getting a free pass against sourcing policy Deletion of Ctrl+Alt+Del (webcomic) (2nd nomination) WP:ILIKEIT Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +4460 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Ibranyi [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']] 12:32, 16 June 2013 (UTC) delete fails , simple as that. Want to argue otherwise? Present |reliable sources that give the subject significant coverage, rather than bizarre conspiracy theories Deletion of Richard Ibranyi WP:GNG||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4461 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raul Cătinaș (2nd nomination) [[User:.karellian-24|.karellian-24]] ([[User talk:.karellian-24|talk]]) 16:37, 27 August 2020 (UTC) keep """2 reasons. At that point we had no rankings, and he would pass being top 10 heavyweight. He was qualified for the Final 16 of heavyweight, it is called the Seoul Final 16 final and is part of the finals event (Seoul and Tokyo). TWICE was qualified then we can presume he could have been top 10 at some point. SECONDLY, actually he meets , Thom Harinck described him as """"perhaps the hardest white hitter in heavyweight history"""".{{cite web|url=https://www.sport.ro/k1/antrenorul-lui-badr-hari-socat-de-un-roman-in-45-de-ani-nu-am-vazut-un-alb-sa-dea-cu-pumnul-atat-de-tare.html|title=Antrenorul lui Badr Hari, SOCAT de un roman: """"In 45 de ani nu am vazut un alb sa dea cu pumnul atat de tare!"""" VIDEO cu ultimul KO |publisher=Pro X|date=13 July 2012|language=Romanian}} In several articles. So he is good for the kickboxing. Good enough to have a page. Not just a gesture of goodwill, but he also meets """ Deletion of Raul Cătinaș (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4462 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Murphy (3rd nomination) User:HelloAnnyong 00:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC) delete """Come on - three nominations and five deletions? Article is most certainly written from someone's who's , if not by Murphy himself. :Image:Gabriel_Murphy_Signature.jpg|His signature marks the source as """"Own work by uploader"""" - it stands to reason that Murphy was the uploader. Either way, I don't think that |notability has been reached here. &mdash""" Deletion of Gabriel Murphy (3rd nomination) WP:COI||WP:N Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +4463 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JG (rapper) User:Eggishorn 18:24, 9 April 2020 (UTC) delete the usual mix of fails Deletion of JG (rapper) WP:NARTIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4464 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preetha P V User:onel5969 16:00, 19 September 2015 (UTC) delete as per nom and above editors. Nothing in the search engines to show this person meets either or Deletion of Preetha P V WP:GNG||WP:NMUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4465 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Neill User:TripleRoryFan 11:05, 10 February 2018 (UTC) comment I don't know exactly when a subject is considered to pass so I'm not going to vote. As far as I can tell there are two non-trivial mentions of Neill online are http://www.espncricinfo.com/ireland/content/player/302056.html here (his Cricinfo profile which just has his basic details and the matches he's umpired) and http://www.cricketireland.ie/news/article/irish-umpires-named-on-icc-panel here (which just explains that he became a member of the ICC Associate & Affiliate Panel of International Umpires for 2016), but I don't know whether or not those two pages (which are already used as refs in the article) are enough to say it passes GNG Deletion of Alan Neill WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4466 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malice Engineering User:JohnCD 08:38, 16 May 2012 (UTC) delete this term may take off, but it doesn't yet satisfy Deletion of Malice Engineering WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +4467 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Ouellette User:Ctjf83 15:32, 25 March 2011 (UTC) delete non-notable, fails Deletion of Greg Ouellette WP:NTENNIS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4468 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Hill (councillor) (2nd nomination) User:Lefcentreright 15:06, 2 December 2019 (UTC) delete Local politician lacking notability. Consequently fails & Deletion of Martin Hill (councillor) (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4469 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unfuddle User:JoshuaZ 15:37, 3 August 2006 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Unfuddle WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4470 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cruise118 User:HighKing 14:42, 22 May 2020 (UTC) delete Unless the various awards push this company into notability, it hasn't met the requirements based on references. I am unable to locate any |significant coverage with |in-depth information on the company and containing |independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/ Deletion of Cruise118 WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4471 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narendra Modi's Google+ Hangout User:TheSpecialUser 01:52, 13 October 2012 (UTC) delete per Aurorion. Not at all notable and doesn't need any mention. It is just something done by a politician and I cannot see how is this notable. In past we have seen all articles regarding Twitter accs' of celebs getting deleted. On comparing them to this, this article isn't even near to what we call Deletion of Narendra Modi's Google+ Hangout WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4472 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadeem Sarwar (Noha Khwan) User:Faizan 14:52, 28 December 2014 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Nadeem Sarwar (Noha Khwan) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4473 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harrison J. Fuller User:Bearcat 21:43, 6 November 2018 (UTC) delete Filmmakers do not automatically qualify for Wikipedia articles just because their work can technically be metaverified by its own presence on YouTube or Vimeo, or because it has IMDb pages — a filmmaker gets over the CREATIVE bar when his films have resulted in |reliable source ''media'' outlets doing ''journalism'', such as film reviews and/or profiles of him as a person, ''about'' him and his work. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a free PR platform — the presence or absence of ''media'' coverage ''about'' him tells us whether he gets in here yet or not, not his own desire to be in here for the publicity Deletion of Harrison J. Fuller WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4474 """Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water Cycle - new definition as """"Waterway Cycle""""""" User:Metropolitan90 15:09, 25 March 2012 (UTC) delete If this is a subject worth covering in Wikipedia, the article ought to be created by someone other than the person who created this concept and named it after himself. Otherwise, we will have problems with |original research and |conflict of interest """Deletion of Water Cycle - new definition as """"Waterway Cycle""""""" WP:NOR||WP:COI Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4475 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martín Deiros (3rd nomination) User:Sam 21:15, 5 August 2018 (UTC) delete """It actually looks like a hoax. :es:Especial:PermaLink/107461448 gives http://web.archive.org/web/20160919120157/http://buscardatos.com/personas.php?nombre=Deiros%20Diego%20Martin&cuit=20-22922937-1 this primary source with a birth year of 1973 and the full name {{mxtn|Deiros Diego Martin}} (or {{mxtn|Diego Martin Deiros}}). I find as little when searching for the alleged full name as just {{mxtn|Martin Deiros}} or {{mxtn|Deiros Martin}}. A birth year of 1973 would make him ~2 years at the time ''La Hora de María y el pájaro de oro'' was released. So he was ... 18 month during production? Not impossible, but the only source we have is http://www.cinenacional.com/persona/martin-deiros and it is http://www.cinenacional.com/acerca-de not reliable. I can find {{bxtn|no}} other source that is not a mirror of Wikipedia that mentions him. It is claimed that ''Un diccionario de films argentinos (1930-1995)'' mentions Deiros on page 291. I do not have the book, but a relative of mine reports that Deiros is not mentioned on page 291, and is not listed in the index. ''Un diccionario de films argentinos (1930-1995)'' is not available for preview via Google Books. Deiros should have won the award """"Premio Pampa"""" as best actor for his television work in 1979, age ~6. I can't find {{em|any}} """"Premio Pampa"""" related to TV/cinema, let alone any mention of Deiros and """"Premio Pampa"""". The rest of the claims are unverifiable as well, and the Youtube videos appear to be false fillers, I don't see a young kid that could possibly be Deiros. All in all this stinks, and is at best a case""" Deletion of Martín Deiros (3rd nomination) WP:DEL7 Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +4476 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Cmar User:Samsmachado 23:21, 3 May 2021 (UTC) keep Plenty of in-depth coverage to demonstrate meeting . As outlined by Pburka, is not a problem. Coverage demonstrates Cmar's notability extends beyond Top Chef and exceeds that of your average reality show contestant Deletion of Stephanie Cmar WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4477 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of selfie-related injuries and deaths (2nd nomination) User:Smartyllama 18:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC) keep Claims are well-sourced. Whether there are scientific studies is irrelevant. It's still notable due to all the coverage. |Whether or not you like the coverage is irrelevant Deletion of List of selfie-related injuries and deaths (2nd nomination) WP:IDONTLIKEIT Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +4478 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck Taylor (wrestler) User:Darrenhusted 23:49, 30 June 2007 (UTC) comment One last time, and s l o w l y for you. You...are...filibustering. Edit the article, stop pumping up this debate. The problem is that you feel you |own this article and don't want it deleted, but spamming AfDs and filibustering '''does not''' help the article Deletion of Chuck Taylor (wrestler) WP:OWN Wikipedia:Ownership of content 43 +4479 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Adel User:Sir 17:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC) keep The article clearly meets as he has played in a fully professional league Deletion of Mohamed Adel WP:NSPORT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4480 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Céline Bethmann User:K 21:15, 17 June 2017 (UTC) merge to Germany's Next Topmodel (cycle 12). A plausible search term, but it's (per available sources) for a stand-alone article. Not notable independent of the show, hence the redirect Deletion of Céline Bethmann WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +4481 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ESOM School of Music User:AllyD 19:06, 6 December 2016 (UTC) delete Originally a , article, which has been through various transformations without ever establishing |reliable 3rd party references, which my searches have also failed to locate. Nor am I seeing any real claim of notability for this tuition centre, even in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ESOM_School_of_Music&oldid=753351101 the strongly promotional version which was recently edited-down in place of G11 deletion. Fails , Deletion of ESOM School of Music :WP:SPA||:WP:COI||:WP:RS||:WP:CORPDEPTH||:WP:GNG Wikipedia:Single-purpose account 21 +4482 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muse fans' boycott User:Ben 12:52, 10 April 2011 (UTC) comment Please, could you cite from the article where it is about ''... social consciousness...'' and ''... representatives from various countries...'' and ''... may eventually develop...''? and Thanks Deletion of Muse fans' boycott WP:INDEPTH||WP:EFFECT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4483 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Belsey (educator) User:1292simon 01:46, 15 December 2012 (UTC) delete Current article is and a community service medal is not enough to establish notability in my opinion Deletion of Bill Belsey (educator) WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Spam 26 +4484 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 New York City attempted bombing User:TheGracefulSlick 06:56, 12 December 2017 (UTC) keep Actually, this was just a bad nomination and I am not even going to entertain it. Per which seems to be a popular response. Revisit this in a few months I suppose Deletion of 2017 New York City attempted bombing WP:RAPID Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4485 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plastique Tiara User:Nikki311 01:16, 23 March 2019 (UTC) merge per above. Doesn't ''currently'' meet Deletion of Plastique Tiara WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4486 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepstep (musician) User:Emily 19:56, 9 September 2018 (UTC) delete nom notable. Fails and Deletion of Deepstep (musician) WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4487 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Spieth User:Bagumba 10:18, 2 January 2019 (UTC) delete to Jordan Spieth#Personal life at his brother's article. Fails with lack of significant coverage in multiple, independent sources. Does not meet . Any current independent significant coverage is spawned from his famous brother Deletion of Steven Spieth WP:GNG||WP:NBASKETBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4488 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Chinedu User:HawkAussie 01:57, 21 April 2020 (UTC) delete Fails both and Deletion of Matthew Chinedu WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4489 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramona Jennex [[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 19:15, 17 May 2009 (UTC) delete per |promotion lack of notability, and an unsourced BLP Deletion of Ramona Jennex WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Spam 26 +4490 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FiscalityONE ERP MRP WMS User:SamHolt6 14:02, 19 July 2017 (UTC) delete subject lacks significance and fails to meet criteria Deletion of FiscalityONE ERP MRP WMS WP:NOTE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4491 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Kushiel's Legacy characters User:Reyk 12:21, 18 September 2011 (UTC) delete I agree with Jfgslo. This article cites no sources whatsoever. Per , there would have to be sources discussing these fictional characters ''as a group''- this list simply does ''not'' inherit notability from the work of fiction. The Wikipedia:V#Notability|verifiability states that if there are no reliable third-party sources that discuss a subject, we shouldn't have an article on it; and an article is not exempt from this just because it is written in a list format. Since there are no independent sources for this topic, it is impossible for it to be anything more than |pure plot summary. A merge has been suggested, but the obvious merge target already contains a character list of appropriate length. Since this article is unsuitable for a stand-alone article and a merge would accomplish nothing, deletion is the only option Deletion of List of Kushiel's Legacy characters WP:LISTN||WP:PLOT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4492 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erich Sbraccia User:Newshunter12 02:29, 26 June 2019 (UTC) delete Fails due to a lack of sustained . Has lots of sources, but they are in nature Deletion of Erich Sbraccia WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:ROUTINE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4493 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San Diego Freeway User:Coccyx 19:30, 31 October 2008 (UTC) delete per nom. Possibly to prevent future recreation Deletion of San Diego Freeway WP:SALT Wikipedia:Protection policy 0 +4494 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jehovah's Witnesses and the United Nations (2nd nomination) User:Coolabahapple 08:34, 1 June 2017 (UTC) comment okay, this is one of the fundamental beliefs of jws (it just doesn't come up when they are preaching door-to door:)), being integral with their view/prophecies about the destruction of all religions and organisations (except them of course:)) that they believe are in opposition to Jehovah (God) and the setting up of God's kingdom on the Earth. Agree that the majority of sources are primary and there does appear to be an undue emphasis on the UN Department of Public Information issue, that really should only be a one or two sentence mention. The article should either be '''kept''' and improved with more |non-jw sources (difficult as there is a dearth (love that word, dearth, yeeaaahh...) of such sources) or '''merged/redirected''' to Eschatology of Jehovah's Witnesses with a 1, 2 line mention at Jehovah's Witnesses beliefs Deletion of Jehovah's Witnesses and the United Nations (2nd nomination) WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4495 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bantha (2nd nomination) User:Mark 17:46, 29 December 2019 (UTC) keep Whatever it’s state at the start of the AfD, this article has developed into a well-written article with many reliable sources. A solid keep per . —{{u| Deletion of Bantha (2nd nomination) WP:HEY Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard 85 +4496 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whipple Van Buren Phillips User:Pastor 02:22, 22 August 2009 (UTC) delete The subject's notability is linked solely to being the grandfather of a famous writer. The article offers no evidence that Mr. Van Buren meets requirements Deletion of Whipple Van Buren Phillips WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4497 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dartmouth Friary User:Smalljim 17:42, 17 August 2013 (UTC) keep now meets following great work by Deletion of Dartmouth Friary WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4498 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Alvarez User:Dennisthe2 22:47, 13 December 2010 (UTC) delete Not only do we have a |conflict of interest, but I refer to - he hasn't made the pro leagues at this point Deletion of Christopher Alvarez WP:COI||WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +4499 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norman Ralph Bowen User:Dhartung 20:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC) comment It is not just that you need to use reliable sources or inline citations. Those are matters of style. But material that is not adequately supported by sources is not |notable and subject to deletion Deletion of Norman Ralph Bowen WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4500 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Committee room User:PWilkinson 00:19, 17 December 2018 (UTC) comment """I can tell that none of the participants so far have ever been directly involved with a UK election campaign (at least at local level), because this is definitely UK political terminology and has been for over 200 years, from the days when British political parties had no formal local organisation, and parliamentary candidates depended on committees of influential local people to help organise their election campaigns. And since at least the Corrupt and Illegal Practices Prevention Act 1883, it has been the officially-used term for almost any premises used for organising their election campaigns by candidates for parliament or local councils, which are subject to a number of legal requirements about what must and must not be done in committee rooms. These days, British political parties tend to refer to their main premises in an area as """"campaign headquarters"""" or similar, and use the term """"committee room"""" just for smaller premises (often rooms in members' homes) used on election day itself - but legally, they are all committee rooms. Reliable sources will certainly exist (mostly, admittedly, probably legal textbooks or books about how to organise an election campaign without breaking the law - and sometimes several decades old) and should enable the article to be expanded well beyond a , but mostly either don't seem to be online at all or only in snippet form. A couple of sources which are good practical guides (if probably not Wikipedia reliable) are https://www.aldc.org/2012/04/committee-rooms/ this and http://www.broxtowelabour.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Polling_day_committee_room_organisers_briefing1.pdf this. And https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=I2GoBAAAQBAJ&pg=PT135&lpg=PT135 this more reliable source should put things a little more into context""" Deletion of Committee room WP:DICDEF Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +4501 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jared Hyatt User:Borgarde 11:48, 4 April 2009 (UTC) keep Professional athlete as per who has played in a fully professional league Deletion of Jared Hyatt WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4502 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugene Stepanenko User:Ejgreen77 05:24, 1 March 2017 (UTC) keep Appears to meet based on My very best wishes's sources Deletion of Eugene Stepanenko WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4503 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual record User:William 22:33, 10 September 2006 (UTC) delete as not meeting Deletion of Virtual record WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +4504 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Little (attorney) User:Boblittle 11:21, 17 June 2006 (UTC) delete advert, and given the author . The fact that Deletion of Robert Little (attorney) WP:VANITY Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +4505 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Lawson User:Lightdarkness 02:14, 14 April 2006 (UTC) delete CSD A7, fails and meets speedy criteria, tagged as such Deletion of Nicholas Lawson WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4506 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfredo Angulo vs. James Kirkland User:Secret 02:42, 27 September 2011 (UTC) delete fails , nothing confirmed Deletion of Alfredo Angulo vs. James Kirkland WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4507 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protests of 2019 (2nd nomination) User:ProcrasinatingReader 11:09, 9 June 2020 (UTC) comment """I'm really on the fence here. Many of the sources there and here in the AfD are opinions and columnists, which I regard as being near useless. There are some actual news sources too, though, like the BBC and WaPo, where they've made some speculative comments on the protests, but these aren't opinion articles so we should consider them. These sources paint a picture of common themes as the reason for the protests, and define an explicit phenomenon as """"the protestors' year"""". So I disagree with the comment that previous comments made absolutely no reference to - there are some arguments in this discussion (eg by {{u|Keepcalmandchill}}. I'm personally on the fence because the premise of the article still feels icky, but I think it may have potential to be cleaned up further""" Deletion of Protests of 2019 (2nd nomination) WP:N||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4508 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aliza Shvarts User:TJRC 19:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC) delete per . Let's not confuse newsworthiness, which is fleeting, with notability, which is not Deletion of Aliza Shvarts WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +4509 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marygiri Public School User:Bbx 10:20, 21 January 2007 (UTC) merge to Koothattukulam per Deletion of Marygiri Public School WP:LOCAL Wikipedia:Places of local interest 41 +4510 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriela Hersham User:Truthsort 16:30, 25 December 2011 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Gabriela Hersham WP:ENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4511 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 New Hampshire General Court Session User:Amarrg 17:35, 14 November 2007 (UTC) delete The article fails #INFO 2.9.4 and does not seem to convey anything meaningful to the general reader Deletion of 2007 New Hampshire General Court Session WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4512 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Lesser User:Papaursa 17:57, 18 October 2018 (UTC) delete He seems to be successful, but that's not a notability criterion. He can't inherit notability from his various teachers and I don't see significant independent coverage from multiple independent reliable sources to support the claim that he meets Deletion of Marc Lesser WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4513 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzan Woodruff User:Yash 22:53, 2 January 2017 (UTC) keep seems to pass by a thin margin and per the coverage received. Although I completely agree to what {{u|TheLongTone}} said at the end Deletion of Suzan Woodruff WP:ARTIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4514 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khaled El-Khweldi El-Hamedi User:Antipastor 12:02, 13 October 2009 (UTC) comment This was previously A7 speedy deleted, but not sure if same version exactly. I am putting it here because of many recreations just to avoid repeated independent deletions. I think it can be deleted per Deletion of Khaled El-Khweldi El-Hamedi WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4515 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassius Marcellus Clay Sr. (2nd nomination) User:Jacona 20:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC) keep """Easily passes . states """"Also, notability not being inherited is not by itself grounds for deletion"""". It should be noted this is one of a pair of articles nominated, along with Clay's wife Odessa Grady Clay""" Deletion of Cassius Marcellus Clay Sr. (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:INHERIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4516 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Command & Conquer: Renegade references User:NASCAR 00:45, 6 October 2007 (UTC) delete per nom - Great example of |original research Deletion of List of Command & Conquer: Renegade references WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4517 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Rail Class 37, 37427 User:MickMacNee 16:43, 26 April 2008 (UTC) delete """While trying to find some notability, I came across this statement from the author """"She is one of the most popular 37/4 ever built, due to her reliability."""". I'm pretty certain this falls well below the standards for wikipedia. A good read is the authors fotopic site, http://37427.fotopic.net/, the section on the left """"Why are you obsessed with 37427 when you've never seen her?"""". I'm not entirely sure what thrash and clag is, but it sounds exciting""" Deletion of British Rail Class 37, 37427 Wikipedia:Notability Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4518 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Restaurant.com User:Terence 03:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC) delete needs reliable sources, does not meet criteria, advertsising Deletion of Restaurant.com WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4519 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AGM-30 engine User:Ahunt 16:26, 12 August 2013 (UTC) delete seems to be non-notable, all refs are from the manufacturer and promotional in origin and thus the article does not make Deletion of AGM-30 engine WP:SPS||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4520 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gore Effect User:Nsaa 13:32, 13 June 2010 (UTC) keep """Some of the text needs to be rewritten so it's fully supported by the sources given (especially op-eds used should be """"attribute the material in the text to the author""""), but the term has been used significantly by mainstream media, and got in dept coverage as shown above by many other users""" Deletion of The Gore Effect WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4521 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theoretical Conceptual Vacuum User:Kinu 23:27, 29 June 2011 (UTC) delete appears to violate and , and is possibly a |hoax. If the article actually says anything that is sourceable, I'm not seeing it Deletion of Theoretical Conceptual Vacuum WP:V||WP:OR||WP:HOAX Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4522 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic University Laboratory School & College User:TimothyBlue 08:27, 17 December 2020 (UTC) merge """and trim to Islamic University, Bangladesh: Per , """"Faculties, departments or degree programs within a university, college, or school are generally not considered notable unless they have made significant contributions to their field."""". The content will fit well into the target article and improve it. As a stand alone article, the subject does not have from addressing the subject directly and in depth.   // """ Deletion of Islamic University Laboratory School & College WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES||WP:SIGCOV||WP:IS||WP:RS Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +4523 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Hiller User:Bearian 16:03, 3 December 2019 (UTC) delete while his work is no doubt laudable, he's not notable per (as seen in the table of sources above), nor Deletion of Michael Hiller WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4524 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Tia Sharp User:Paul 22:18, 13 November 2012 (UTC) keep Lots of significant coverage on this. Meets . Why do we have to have these debates about every single murder case article Deletion of Death of Tia Sharp WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4525 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World War II.5 User:Gosox5555 13:29, 6 September 2009 (UTC) delete per Deletion of World War II.5 WP:MADEUP Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +4526 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Mohmand User:Hmlarson 04:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC) keep per Deletion of Sara Mohmand WP:NBADMINTON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4527 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Kapil Sharma Show episodes (2nd nomination) User:Mrschimpf 05:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC) keep """This nomination is entirely confusing in structure; you look at the 'list of's presented thinking they're bundled nominations, but they're '''expired''' nominations, trying to muddle the pool towards a delete by throwing random nominations out that are merely related by airing on Indian television. That's not how this works. Meanwhile on the '''actual''' topic of the AfD I'm seeing something sourced by multiple different sources and a lot of ing by the nominator just for the sole reason of them being """"promotional newbies"""", which immediately bends me towards an automatic keep (especially based on your previous history of weak-reasoned AfD's regarding Indian television topics). Clean up this nom, don't attack other editors (no matter if they have 1 or 100,000 edits) and use the proper way of presenting it; as it is this is just a solution looking for a problem (and use other avenues like before coming to AfD""" Deletion of List of The Kapil Sharma Show episodes (2nd nomination) WP:BITE||WP:RFP Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers 56 +4528 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jefferson Souza Araújo Menezes User:Spiderone 21:43, 23 June 2021 (UTC) delete WP:BEFORE clearly done by nominator. I attempted to find sources myself but could not locate any coverage towards ; only wide-ranging databases with a stats profile page about him like https://www.sport.de/fussball/pe265108/jefferson/ Sport.de Deletion of Jefferson Souza Araújo Menezes WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4529 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vembu Technologies User:Ihcoyc 14:21, 12 April 2013 (UTC) delete One of their products is a ''protection solution''; another, a ''management solution''. |MEGO Deletion of Vembu Technologies WP:B2B Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4530 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lowly Palace User:Atsme 00:32, 3 February 2018 (UTC) delete independent producer on YouTube, fails Deletion of Lowly Palace WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4531 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Long Branch shooting User:Alansohn 22:44, 1 January 2018 (UTC) delete per . Sadly, the murders of *ONLY* four people in a mass shooting is tragically too ordinary to merit the kind of long-term coverage that would establish notability. Any meaningful content could be preserved by a merge to Long Branch, New Jersey Deletion of 2018 Long Branch shooting WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4532 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two Words (film) User:Donaldd23 14:32, 17 January 2021 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Two Words (film) WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4533 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BootB User:Lankiveil 12:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC) delete appears to fail Deletion of BootB WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4534 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Farman User:Fenix 15:50, 22 November 2016 (UTC) delete Fails |NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a |fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy |GNG Deletion of Paul Farman WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4535 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get Out (song) User:Boffob 16:56, 3 December 2008 (UTC) delete no indication it passes , though nothing prevents you from |boldly redirecting Deletion of Get Out (song) WP:NSONGS||WP:BOLD Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4536 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Planetary Bill of Rights Project User:Alba 13:15, 24 March 2006 (UTC) delete nn . This guy ''does'' know about the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, doesn't he Deletion of The Planetary Bill of Rights Project WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4537 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood Red Renaissance User:Falcon8765 00:10, 10 July 2009 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Blood Red Renaissance WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4538 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barrie Needham User:David 22:48, 27 December 2010 (UTC) delete I couldn't find enough citations in Google scholar to convince me of a pass of #C1, and I couldn't find enough articles about him or his works in Google news to convince me of a pass of Deletion of Barrie Needham WP:PROF||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4539 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Db4o User:Pohta 15:13, 26 January 2010 (UTC) keep http://books.google.com/books?id=SXG19zl8qF4C&printsec=frontcover&dq=%22Db4o%22+-inpublisher:icon&as_brr=0&cd=1#v=onepage&q=&f=false http://books.google.com/books?id=0zkEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA27&dq=%22Db4o%22+-inpublisher:icon&as_brr=0&cd=2#v=onepage&q=%22Db4o%22%20-inpublisher%3Aicon&f=false http://www.ddj.com/database/187203597?pgno=2 http://www.ddj.com/database/199901523?pgno=2 http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8645 etc. Even covered in college textbooks http://books.google.com/books?id=fSMmr6ptb9oC&pg=RA2-PA269&dq=%22Db4o%22+-inpublisher:icon&lr=&as_brr=0&cd=21#v=onepage&q=%22Db4o%22%20-inpublisher%3Aicon&f=false. The article could use some work, but it's definitely nowhere near the advertorial level required for deletion. Also a http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/views/java/libraryview.jsp?search_by=db4o 7-part tutorial in IBM developerWorks, which was already linked in the article. Big for the guys trying to CSD this Deletion of Db4o WP:TROUT Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout 68 +4540 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flesh on Fire: Addicted to a Dream User:Devonian 22:32, 9 November 2020 (UTC) delete sourced to IMDb, a passing mention and a press release, fails Deletion of Flesh on Fire: Addicted to a Dream WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4541 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Schlafly (3rd nomination) User:Edison 05:16, 11 July 2008 (UTC) delete Refs seem to be trivial mention or passing reference, not the substantial coverage needed to satisfy . Notability is not inherited, so being the son of the woman who prevented the Equal Rights Amendment from being added to the Constitution is insufficient. He seems to get only passing reference in coverage of Conservapedia Deletion of Andrew Schlafly (3rd nomination) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4542 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of mathematical artists user:Andrew 18:52, 7 June 2015 (UTC) keep Passes . See ''http://www.ams.org/samplings/feature-column/fcarc-art4 Mathematical artists and artist mathematicians'', for example Deletion of List of mathematical artists WP:LISTN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4543 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JSHint (2nd nomination) NONE NONE keep spaced ndash}} Topic appears to just meet , per Deletion of JSHint (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4544 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orlando Pelayo j.r User:DrunkenSmurf 01:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC) delete I can find no sources to verify this 'actor' even exists. Article really needs to be sourced and some additional info added. Personally I think it is a |hoax but I'd be happy to be proven incorrect Deletion of Orlando Pelayo j.r WP:HOAX Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes 40 +4545 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Folarin Balogun User:ArsenalFan700 15:34, 21 October 2020 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Folarin Balogun WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4546 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States House of Representatives elections, 2010 - predictions User:Safiel 22:33, 5 August 2010 (UTC) delete per or at very least merge back into the main article Deletion of United States House of Representatives elections, 2010 - predictions WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4547 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skilling v. United States User:RadManCF 23:48, 11 March 2011 (UTC) keep The supreme court is so closely followed by legions of legal publications, so I would argue that its not unreasonable to assume it's decisions are notable per Deletion of Skilling v. United States WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4548 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omar 'OJ' Koroma User:Vickser 08:54, 8 August 2008 (UTC) delete """The BBC claim that he's going to Norwich to gain first team play isn't enough for me. Notability isn't temporary, and as of now he's not notable. If tomorrow he got injured and couldn't play football anymore, and had no chance of ever playing, he wouldn't be notable. That's different than the High School Musical 3 case, where, if tomorrow Disney announced that they weren't releasing the film, or something else similar happened, the film would still be notable. If he ever does make a professional debut, which, football being football is far from certain, the article is easy to recreate. Ask on the Footy project with """"this person now has a professional debut, could you recreate the article?"""" and I'm sure you'll get a friendly admin to recreate it. Heck, if you're afraid, ask me and I'll ask an admin. We're not a |crysal ball, and as of now, he's not notable""" Deletion of Omar 'OJ' Koroma WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4549 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teenu Arora (2nd nomination) User:Hako9 01:17, 11 August 2020 (UTC) delete The Zee news story is written by Indo-Asian News Service|IANS. See . Other stories are either short interviews or trivial mentions Deletion of Teenu Arora (2nd nomination) WP:SYNDICATED Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4550 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Fraternal Organization - L'Association Fraternelle Canadienne User:Habanero 05:55, 4 May 2008 (UTC) delete Per nomination. It definitely exists, but an occasional press release isn't enough for Deletion of Canadian Fraternal Organization - L'Association Fraternelle Canadienne WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4551 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Products Manufactured in Australia and New Zealand User:Bejnar 04:29, 26 February 2010 (UTC) delete """This article is primarily |original research as is shown, by among other things by the section /* Search engines */. In the attempt to ''puff'' ANZAC production, the author makes transition errors between sources and text, such as converting """"Tasmania is the world's biggest producer of legal raw opiates."""" to """"Tasmania produces 40% of the worlds opiates."""" which is a very different thing. Another example, the author coverts """"Australia has two ageing petrochemical complexes."""" to """"Australia has a substantial chemical industry, including the manufacture of many petrochemicals."""" Real content might be worth saving, this article doesn't have real content, just puffery""" Deletion of Products Manufactured in Australia and New Zealand WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4552 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Health effects of wind power User:Artw 15:11, 8 August 2009 (UTC) comment the article as it stands appears to have major problems - for the article to stay (or be merged) they would need to be addressed Deletion of Health effects of wind power WP:UNDUE Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +4553 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Copia Doble Systema [[User_talk:Yintan|''' Yinta''''''n ''']] 20:23, 3 May 2013 (UTC) delete as far as I can tell they don't pass (yet Deletion of Copia Doble Systema WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4554 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eternal Blaze User:Gongshow 06:09, 14 February 2012 (UTC) comment """Peaking at #2 in Japan leads me to think the song is, as suggests, """"probably notable"""". This http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2008-10-08/nana-mizuki-trickster-cd-single-reaches-no.2 source, which according to Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Online reliable sources#Situational may be considered reliable, notes that """"Mizuki's 2005 'Eternal Blaze' CD single for the ''Magical Girl Lyrical Nanoha A's'' opening theme song was the first single by a voice actress to reach #2 on the weekly chart."""" I'm curious if siginificant coverage exists in non-English sources""" Deletion of Eternal Blaze WP:NSONGS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4555 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Lash User:ARoseWolf 21:13, 21 June 2021 (UTC) delete As noted above, the originator of the draft and nominator points to a lack of reliable sources which assert claims of notability. I conducted my own search and turned up nothing of note in reliable sources. The subject fails our very basic notability policies and does not meet any SNG guideline either. Fails , Fails and no reliable sources can be found according to Deletion of Chris Lash WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG||WP:N||WP:RS Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +4556 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gemma Quinnell User:Wjemather 11:52, 22 February 2021 (UTC) delete per . No to suggest this is a notable person Deletion of Gemma Quinnell WP:NOTRESUME||WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4557 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N&k Technology [[User talk:Satori Son|Satori Son]] 21:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC) delete as insufficiently notable per Deletion of N&k Technology WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4558 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adele Uddo User:AuthorAuthor 06:25, 5 June 2019 (UTC) keep I improved the article by adding a bit more content with sources and by removing POV. Subject has had sustained wide coverage in the media as evidenced by the cited reliable sources. Easily passes and meets notability criteria as per Deletion of Adele Uddo WP:GNG||WP:NMODEL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4559 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamond Standard User:SportingFlyer 10:19, 25 November 2019 (UTC) delete this was recently deleted on grounds and I would probably have kept it that way. The sourcing is pretty terrible, fails and Deletion of Diamond Standard WP:G11||WP:PROMO||WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +4560 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Cooper (voice-over artist) User:Avala 13:11, 2 February 2012 (UTC) keep fully meets the . Issues with sourcing are unfortunate but not enough to delete the article, on contrary it is an invitation to improve it. Deleting is easy, improving is not, so try doing that instead Deletion of Mike Cooper (voice-over artist) WP:ENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4561 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/6th hour heroes User:Lankiveil 05:17, 21 January 2007 (UTC) delete don't see how this passes Deletion of 6th hour heroes WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4562 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liza Koshy (actress) User:Gongshow 01:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC) keep Subject's roles meet , and sufficient coverage exists (e.g., Variety, Hollywood Reporter, LA Times) to satisfy Deletion of Liza Koshy (actress) WP:ENT||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4563 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sea Urchin Editions User:SarahStierch 16:48, 6 April 2014 (UTC) delete Failed to pass and for me Deletion of Sea Urchin Editions WP:GNG||WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4564 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Robinson (surfer) [[User Talk:JzG|Just zis Guy you know?]] 21:34, 19 June 2006 (UTC) delete noting but also - and , for that matter Deletion of James Robinson (surfer) WP:VAIN||WP:BIO||WP:HOLE Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +4565 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AFA (file format) User:Emily 18:29, 25 April 2010 (UTC) delete """Astrotite and AFA (file format): utterly fails . I'm the one who put the speedy tag on Astrotite originally: it was a website and company with no substantial claim of notability. It was blatant utobiography in my opinion, and its only major claim was that it existed and it was the only software that could use the AFA format, which of course is circular reasoning and not a claim to notability. The rest of it was talky-talk about the software's creator, Vicente Sanchez-Alarcos Blanco, who openly uses the username """"Matabyte"""" in places other than Wikipedia""" Deletion of AFA (file format) WP:GNG||WP:A Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4566 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuji Food User:HighKing 17:33, 30 June 2017 (UTC) comment """Note to closing admin. It appears that many editors do not understand the policies and guidelines on sources that meet the criteria to establish notability and many make the mistake of stating a source is """"notable"""" (which it might well be) which is a completely different criteria for establishing notability for the """"topic"""" in question. For example, {{u|Cunard}} above has stated that the article in the Los Angeles Business Journal is an """"independent source"""" (correct, the """"publisher"""" is independent) and substantial (OK, lets go along with that). What he fails to point out is that the article fails the criteria for establishing notability because the article almost completely relies on direct quotations from the president of Fuji Food or their owners or """"anonymous"""" company employees and therefore fails both and . Similarly, the Chicago Business article (sure, reliable, independent source) is a regurgitated Press Release from Fuji Foods and also contains quotes the company CEO - in fact the entire article relies exclusively on the company for facts and info and therefore that reference also fails both and . In fact, *all* of the references provided fall foul of either one or the other policy or guideline for establishing notability. Not one is """"intellectually independent"""" and meets the criteria""" Deletion of Fuji Food WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4567 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanguard (band) User:DarjeelingTea 21:17, 15 February 2017 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Vanguard (band) WP:NMUSICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4568 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nondance Records User:Redfarmer 00:36, 29 January 2008 (UTC) delete WP:BAND, Deletion of Nondance Records WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4569 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Part Two of the Fundamental Statute of the Kingdom of Albania User:Tillerh11 00:39, 12 July 2018 (UTC) delete per nominator, fails . Nothing else on the page Deletion of Part Two of the Fundamental Statute of the Kingdom of Albania WP:NOTREPOSITORY Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4570 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Differences between book and film versions of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone User:Koffieyahoo 04:19, 10 August 2006 (UTC) delete per , unless someone can find a reputable source that describes these differences Deletion of Differences between book and film versions of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4571 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April Sanders User:GPL93 18:23, 17 June 2020 (UTC) keep Clearly passes as Sanders was a member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia. Best Deletion of April Sanders WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4572 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet Computer Chess Tournament User:Red 21:51, 21 July 2020 (UTC) merge per above. The search term seems perfectly plausible as a Deletion of Internet Computer Chess Tournament WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +4573 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Schlesinger User:LinguistAtLarge 21:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC) comment There are a few http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Kyle+Schlesinger%22&cf=all Gnews hits, so he might have notability, but I can't access the pay-per-view articles to tell. The issue isn't too relevant, since COI editing is only a problem when it affects Wikipedia's goal of producing a neutral, reliably sourced encyclopedia —  Deletion of Kyle Schlesinger WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +4574 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massive Audio User:Sir 09:46, 27 June 2006 (UTC) keep looks like this passes Deletion of Massive Audio WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4575 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transformation of culture User:Smmurphy 15:42, 8 June 2017 (UTC) comment I agree with Fixuture, no one has opposed your merge suggestion, perhaps you could bring it up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sociology, wait another week, and then e bold|Be bold Deletion of Transformation of culture WP:B Wikipedia:Bots 91 +4576 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Anal Cunt band members User:Cannibaloki 02:29, 26 June 2009 (UTC) merge to Anal Cunt per Deletion of List of Anal Cunt band members WP:CFORK Wikipedia:Content forking 33 +4577 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TryBishop User:Mothman 16:24, 28 May 2019 (UTC) delete Subject fails all notability including . The coverage referenced here is not coverage but trivial mention at best. 'His name appears' does not constitute signifant coverage. A news search recommended trying 'tray bishop'. Eight pages of google search did not reveal any coverage. advises that such articles should not exist. Wikipedia is not the place to discover the hidden gems of the midwest hip hop scene. Set up a web site to do that Deletion of TryBishop WP:MUSIC||WP:SUBNOT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4578 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defibtech User:MER 13:44, 21 December 2006 (UTC) delete as thinly disguised Deletion of Defibtech WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Spam 26 +4579 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post-disco User:RockandDiscoFanCZ 18:41, 15 December 2009 (UTC) keep """per Special:Contributions/Power.corrupts|Power.corrupts. Post-disco IS a real genre (it's the same like post-punk, post-rock, post-country, post-post.. etc .. and meaning is all the same = after the punk, after the rock, etc), it's NOT only an era. We can also speculate that Disco is not a kind of music, because RollingStone defined it per the word """"discotheque"""" http://www.jahsonic.com/VinceAletti.html -> disco is all type of music that is playing on discotheques. So much gonna get ya on Disco article, I recommend to nominee a Disco article""" Deletion of Post-disco WP:SYNTHESIS Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4580 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Pepper Chinese Cuisine User:S 23:28, 7 August 2008 (UTC) keep with edits for . I see three serious reviews in sources I find acceptably reliable. The nominator could have read those reviews and added an assertion of notability based on them, rather than invoking the afd process Deletion of Red Pepper Chinese Cuisine WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +4581 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of World War II Bronze Star Medal recipients User:Ventric 21:10, 31 December 2017 (UTC) delete per above. I agree with the / argument and the highly selective nature of this list with regard to the staggering number of recipients of this award. This specific information of this award should be on the article of the |notable person; not the other way around Deletion of List of World War II Bronze Star Medal recipients WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:DEFINE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4582 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azeem Ward User:Kinu 20:23, 15 May 2015 (UTC) delete Not enough sourcing to meet or to justify the existence of a . As stated by multiple commenters above, and 1E are appropriate essays here. also applies as well; notability is not temporary, and there is no evidence that this is anything but random news Deletion of Azeem Ward WP:ANYBIO||WP:BLP||WP:15MOF||WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4583 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Seventh-Day Adventist churches in Jamaica User:Bakazaka 22:21, 31 December 2018 (UTC) delete as Wikipedia is a web hosting service for religious organizations, nor is it a directory. Readers can use Google to find the Adventist directory/yearbook sites, and there's no reason for Wikipedia to serve as a database clone or backup copy of those sites Deletion of List of Seventh-Day Adventist churches in Jamaica WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4584 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gelheads User:Aspects 03:19, 29 July 2010 (UTC) delete both band and album. The band has no reliable sources and fails Deletion of Gelheads WP:NMUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4585 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playstation Portable 2 User:Twirligig 01:57, 24 January 2009 (UTC) delete per and Deletion of Playstation Portable 2 WP:HOAX||WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes 40 +4586 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of different maze types User:ComplexRational 16:03, 23 February 2019 (UTC) delete """As per nom, this appears to be a list of anecdotes. There can be no comparisions if there is not enough information to classify """"types"""" of mazes rather than single mazes, and this presentation of a comparison chart seems to make a generalization – . The cited examples can be merged into labyrinth or maze if they are not already there""" Deletion of Comparison of different maze types WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:OR Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4587 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Blake Ames User:Kudpung 21:32, 5 October 2010 (UTC) delete as per nominator. Fails all policies at , , , and Deletion of Andrew Blake Ames WP:ANYBIO||WP:BASIC||WP:ENT||WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4588 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticisms of Harry Reid (3rd nomination) User:Eustress 19:41, 17 May 2011 (UTC) keep """Too much valid info here to simply delete. As mentioned in the previous AfD, the article conforms with : """"Sections of long articles should be spun off into their own articles leaving a summary in its place."""" According to http://www.javascriptkit.com/script/script2/charcount.shtml this tool, the character count of Harry_Reid#Criticism is 4,020, while the character count for Criticisms of Harry Reid is 15,355—more than three times as large. (In fact, the entire Harry Reid article has only 11,992 characters.) If a merge is desired with Political positions of Harry Reid, then a |merge request should instead be initiated""" Deletion of Criticisms of Harry Reid (3rd nomination) WP:SS||WP:MERGE Wikipedia:Summary style 23 +4589 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolai Lomov User:Stormtracker94 12:22, 30 September 2007 (UTC) delete per , , and . {{User:Stormtracker94/sig Deletion of Nicolai Lomov WP:N||WP:RS||WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4590 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Lord (One Life to Live) User:Shooterwalker 21:37, 28 January 2012 (UTC) delete no significant information from third-party sources can be found to . Listing the actors portraying the character is not enough to explain this character's reception or significance Deletion of Tony Lord (One Life to Live) WP:verify notability Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4591 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lesmahagow High School User:Adamant1 19:49, 26 December 2020 (UTC) delete reading through all the discussion and looking over the sourcing it appears that this school lacks the multiple in-depth reliable independent sources it needs to pass and . As they all seem to either trivial or connected to the school somehow. Which doesn't cut it for the standards of notability. That said if someone is able to provide |three good, independent, in-depth, reliable sources I will be more then willing to change my vote Deletion of Lesmahagow High School WP:GNG||WP:NORG||WP:THREE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4592 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 asian games User:Black 17:58, 17 March 2007 (UTC) keep per the references added since the start of the AFD (see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2018_Asian_Games&diff=114886609&oldid=114598158 diff). no longer seems applicable (it ''is'' notable and almost certain to take place Deletion of 2018 asian games WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4593 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of physical therapy schools in the United States User:Exemplo347 20:34, 1 July 2017 (UTC) delete Fails and no evidence that is satisfied Deletion of List of physical therapy schools in the United States WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:LISTN Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4594 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 failed Gothenburg terrorist attack User:P199 13:46, 19 September 2011 (UTC) delete per : no indication this will have any lasting coverage or effect Deletion of 2011 failed Gothenburg terrorist attack WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4595 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katherine Monbiot User:Wee 12:11, 11 August 2018 (UTC) delete Doesn't meet , nothing more than anecdotal coverage in sources Deletion of Katherine Monbiot WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4596 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Folklore in Uzbekistan User:Bishonen 20:41, 7 April 2016 (UTC) delete per , indeed Deletion of Folklore in Uzbekistan WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +4597 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of female performers in lesbian porn films User:Suomi 20:23, 13 August 2010 (UTC) delete """A potential BLP concern, although with proper sourcing that's not ''necessarily'' a reason to delete. I fail to see how it's encyclopedic though, as acting in """"lesbian"""" porn is hardly a defining moment for porn actresses. To me, this looks like . It's also not a mirror of List of male performers in gay porn films, since the vast, vast majority of """"lesbian"""" porn films are not aimed at lesbian audiences and cannot be considered """"gay porn"""" in any way. I'm also not quite sure why""" Deletion of List of female performers in lesbian porn films WP:IINFO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4598 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judicial murder User:Evb 19:00, 14 September 2007 (UTC) delete per nom, and . Also, violates . (maybe not Deletion of Judicial murder WP:OR||WP:SYNTH||WP:NPOV Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4599 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Maccabeats User:DRosenbach 13:17, 19 May 2011 (UTC) keep As per this new information, let's get this over with quickly -- Deletion of The Maccabeats WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +4600 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Event symmetry User:XOR 18:45, 5 April 2021 (UTC) delete My PROD rationale was {{tq|With the original publication getting only 11 citations in 25 years, even by the permissive standards of Google Scholar (counting unpublished items and self-citations), this is not a notable physics idea. throughout.}} I thought at the time that that was an understatement; the nomination goes into more detail Deletion of Event symmetry WP:SYNTH Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4601 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolution of Music Management User:Nsk92 18:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC) delete Almost pure Deletion of Evolution of Music Management WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4602 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kara Guggenmos User:Quarl NONE delete as |non-notable vanity biography Deletion of Kara Guggenmos WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4603 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of articles on criticism in Wikipedia User:MER 06:46, 27 January 2007 (UTC) merge to project space, where it should find a good home. Too |self-referential Deletion of List of articles on criticism in Wikipedia WP:ASR Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +4604 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic State of Iraq and Syria User:Zangar 02:33, 12 January 2014 (UTC) merge to Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant - this does seem to be a |content fork. Should events (and sources) indicate a separation of the two named states then the article could be reinstated in its own right Deletion of Islamic State of Iraq and Syria WP:CFORK Wikipedia:Content forking 33 +4605 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pankajakasthuri User:HighKing 13:19, 18 April 2018 (UTC) delete References fail the criteria for establishing notability. The founder appears to be notable but notability is not inherited. Topic fails GNG and Deletion of Pankajakasthuri WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4606 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Razavi User:Colapeninsula 10:07, 27 November 2013 (UTC) delete Fails . No substantial reviews of her work, no indication of her importance/significance/innovation as a writer, no major prizes, and I can't find any in-depth -style coverage. Some of the claims to fame are very desperate (e.g. she was thanked in liner notes by a band, whose article she created). Nomination is accurate Deletion of Lauren Razavi WP:WRITER||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4607 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dungeon (The Legend of Zelda Series) User:Cocoapropo 02:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC) delete """Okay. Everybody here probably expects that I'll weigh in on this debate, especially since I have SUCH a -y attitude about it (tell me YOU don't about YOUR OWN articles). This article was originally going to discuss dungeons in video games in general, but I could not conceive of any other games that really have """"dungeons"""" in the sense that the ''Zelda'' series does, so it turned into a heavily ''Zelda''-based article, which does include a loose definition of a """"dungeon"""" in the sense used outside of the ''Zelda'' series. I don't feel that this subject, whether of ''Zelda'' or otherwise, gets proper treatment ''anywhere'' on Wikipedia, and so I set out to fill a perceived need for such a definition, and though some things that are mentioned in this article are similar to those in the articles written on each individual game, I haven't repeated anything. I put everything into my own words, with several sources to back some of the stuff up, while most of what is written herein can be found by anyone who has a console and a game. A lot of the video-game-related content on Wikipedia is written with the games as the basis for the majority of the information given in the articles, yet most people don't seem to have a problem with that. I don't doubt that the ''Zelda'' dungeons have served as the basis and model for many other things. Video games are a strong influence in modern cultures across the world. ''Zelda'' is one of the largest components in that category. Dungeons, which are one of the series' most prominent features, are part of the ''Zelda'' series and beg a definition, which cannot currently be found on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is for helping people improve their ideas, not tearing them down, but that's all I've gotten about this article so far""" Deletion of Dungeon (The Legend of Zelda Series) WP:OWN Wikipedia:Ownership of content 43 +4608 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haas family User:Bearian 22:04, 20 November 2019 (UTC) delete as and of IG Farben Deletion of Haas family WP:OR||WP:FORK Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4609 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Website Magazine User:L337 00:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC) delete per #General criteria|CSD G4: recreation of deleted material. After two speedies this ''still'' hasn't been fixed. Looks unlikely it will at this rate Deletion of Website Magazine WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +4610 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Study abroad information User:Bfigura 04:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC) delete indeed, Wikipedia is #HOWTO|not a howto guide. Not convinced there's something worth merging here Deletion of Study abroad information WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4611 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ImpressCMS User:LinguistAtLarge 21:47, 23 January 2009 (UTC) keep This piece of software has |verifiable |notability, as I demonstrated by adding half a dozen |reliable sources to the article. It has also won an award. If more sources are wanted, they can easily be had.   Deletion of ImpressCMS WP:V||WP:N||WP:RS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4612 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Nova User:Rockstar915 06:17, 20 April 2007 (UTC) comment The spelling of the name is no big deal, as a simple page move can change that. If an external reference can prove that she's won the Venus Award, then she's possibly notable, and probably fulfills , and the article should be kept. I'll go ahead and give it a shot and try to find some info on her. If I or the rest of the participating Wiki community can't find anything in five days, then we should delete Deletion of Anna Nova WP:PORNBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4613 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronald Barnes (Alaskan politician) User:Beeblebrox 18:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC) delete """I came to this expecting this would be a member of the state senate or something, but he doesn't actually appear to be a politician at all in the normally understood sense of the word. He may need policitial skills to be the """"diplomatic representative"""" of a small NGO but that's not the same thing. Attending a notable event event as a representative of an obscure organization does not confer notability on the attendee. Overall looks like a case of . An article on the organization he represents would be a better place to start, if there are any |sources to construct that from""" Deletion of Ronald Barnes (Alaskan politician) WP:VSCA||WP:RS Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +4614 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medical research related to low-carbohydrate diets User:Xasodfuih 23:23, 9 February 2009 (UTC) merge I have already merged the last section (the one about metaanalyses and systematic reviews which was so far down the page that nobody here seems to have noticed it) to Low-carbohydrate_diet#Meta-analytic_studies_and_systematic_reviews. That section is entirely appropriate per , and was not included in the main article. So, this needs to be a redirect to comply with GFDL Deletion of Medical research related to low-carbohydrate diets WP:MEDRS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4615 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acton Fall Fair User:Bearcat 19:37, 20 June 2018 (UTC) delete There's only one non-|primary source here to even ''begin'' establishing notability, and it just links to a general content directory for the defunct local community weekly while providing ''no'' title or date information to help us figure out ''where'' in its 100+-year haystack the content actually being cited might be found. This is ''exactly'' why I keep getting on people's necks about the need to provide ''complete'' citation details and not just blank URLs or links to generic content directories. Something like this would have to clear on the basis of coverage that expanded ''beyond'' just the local weekly newspaper, but there's no evidence of that being shown at all. It can absolutely be briefly mentioned in the town's article, but the sourcing here doesn't earn it a standalone article of its own independently of that Deletion of Acton Fall Fair WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:ORGDEPTH Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4616 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of current Major League Soccer players with national team caps User:Ajf773 08:56, 22 December 2016 (UTC) delete Definitely Deletion of List of current Major League Soccer players with national team caps WP:LISTCRUFT Wikipedia:Listcruft 66 +4617 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KeyedBits User:Alpha 02:52, 1 October 2011 (UTC) delete Article lacks |reliable third party sources and is almost entirely comprised of |origional research Deletion of KeyedBits WP:IRS||WP:OR Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4618 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandeep Unnikrishnan User:LeaveSleaves 20:15, 28 November 2008 (UTC) merge to List of victims of the November 2008 Mumbai attacks. Even though under #NEWS and this person may not qualify for an article, I think that in present situation a redirect would be helpful. Particularly since he was among the security forces and slightly more notable than other victims. ''Special:Contributions/LeaveSleaves|Leave Deletion of Sandeep Unnikrishnan WP:NOT||WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4619 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zac Corker User:Coredesat 08:13, 19 July 2006 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Zac Corker WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4620 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bunny nick User:Quarl NONE delete sloppy |hoax. &mdash Deletion of Bunny nick WP:HOAX Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes 40 +4621 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hacoupian User:AllyD 12:36, 4 September 2016 (UTC) delete """There is a page on fa.wikipedia.org but, judging by a Google Translate, it is fully promotional in tone and lacking in better sources. The firm does seem to be included in a list of Iran's 100 valuable brands (translating as """"Hakobyan"""": http://www.khabaronline.ir/detail/394761/Economy/industry) but I am not seeing |evidence that this is more than a run-of-the-mill retailer without |encyclopaedic notability""" Deletion of Hacoupian :WP:RS||:WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4622 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tumiso Rakgare User:Enos733 03:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC) keep meets as a member of the Botswana Parliament Deletion of Tumiso Rakgare WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4623 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Denise McGregor User:Clarityfiend 23:18, 23 March 2016 (UTC) keep Front page news, graphic TV reenactment and interest in the cold case 35 years later satisfy Deletion of Murder of Denise McGregor WP:CRIME Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4624 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaac Astill NONE NONE delete This page about me was set up years ago by friends and has become a source of embarrassment. I agree that I am not adequately notable as according to . I would like this page to be deleted Deletion of Isaac Astill WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4625 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Peacock User:Bearcat 20:44, 29 September 2014 (UTC) delete per nom. Under , a person does not qualify for a Wikipedia article just for being an as-yet-unelected ''candidate'' in a future election — if you cannot credibly source that they were ''already'' notable enough for a Wikipedia article under a ''different'' inclusion criterion ''before'' they were named a candidate, then they do not ''become'' notable enough for a Wikipedia article until they ''win'' the election. And needless to say, no strong evidence of preexisting notability has been demonstrated here — virtually all of the coverage is about either her candidacy (failing ) or her relationship with somebody else (failing Deletion of Stephanie Peacock WP:NPOL||WP:ROUTINE||WP:NOTINHERITED Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4626 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Murphy (baseball fan) User:Edison 20:10, 8 August 2007 (UTC) delete and '''Redirect''' to Barry Bonds, per the above arguments, and per failure to satisfy . 15 minutes of fame does not make a lucky person encyclopedic. Otherwise everyone who won $400,000 in a lottery would be entitled to an article (they are not Deletion of Matt Murphy (baseball fan) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4627 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Salvaggione User:Bettia 12:39, 31 January 2009 (UTC) delete Fails as he has not played at a fully professional level yet, and there's no indication that he's notable in any other way Deletion of Chris Salvaggione WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4628 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaleb Eulls User:Jujutacular 22:43, 3 September 2009 (UTC) delete Subject has not yet received notability in football per , and per nomination, subject is not notable for one news event either Deletion of Kaleb Eulls WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4629 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional doppelgängers User:Reyk 21:55, 2 February 2010 (UTC) delete Terrible, just terrible. Seems to consist of nothing but |synthesis and |original research Deletion of List of fictional doppelgängers WP:SYNTH||WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4630 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Last Tormentor User:Colapeninsula 09:01, 28 September 2012 (UTC) merge or '''redirect''' to Gorgoroth per . Not a notable recording Deletion of The Last Tormentor WP:NMUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4631 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BaoFeng UV-5R User:Mark 21:34, 26 October 2019 (UTC) keep The ARRL, FCC and Hackaday sources are independent RS and there seems enough depth for and a modest article. --{{u| Deletion of BaoFeng UV-5R WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4632 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bush family conspiracy theory User:Jdcooper 13:36, 7 May 2006 (UTC) keep As long as sources can be provided for examples of when these conspiracy theories have been alleged (to avoid ) and the article is slightly rewritten to '''emphasise''' that they are conspiracy theories, I see no problem with a verified list of things people have alleged. Maybe '''rename''' to List of Bush family conspiracy theories Deletion of Bush family conspiracy theory WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4633 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imelda Salvador User:Anyo 08:22, 29 May 2008 (UTC) delete All three are members of families that are prominent in the Philippine film and showbusiness industries. It is commonly asserted that all three are members of Star Magic, meaning that they are under contract with ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corporation, one of the largest producers of film and television programs in the Philippines. However, unless or until they actually accomplish something, such as star in films or television programs (there being no proof offered in the articles that they do), they don't belong in Wikipedia, which is neither an |advertising vehicle nor a |crystal ball Deletion of Imelda Salvador WP:NOTADVERTISING||WP:NOTCRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4634 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comb Ball User:BusterD 23:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC) delete Note the references date previous to the supposed creation date of the subject and are therefore completely irrelevant. This has all the notability of |Baseketball (before the BASEketball|movie Deletion of Comb Ball WP:NFT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +4635 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thin (body) User:TenPoundHammer 03:47, 28 July 2007 (UTC) delete Violates #DICT. We don't need these dicdef pages Deletion of Thin (body) WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4636 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Treason laws in the United States User:Bearian 02:30, 16 June 2017 (UTC) keep per and Deletion of Treason laws in the United States WP:HEY||WP:ODD Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard 85 +4637 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-Hobby User:Nosebagbear 21:04, 9 October 2018 (UTC) delete couldn't find any refs that satisfied both Sig Cov, independent and so notability demonstrated. The three lines there are some blend of and advertorial Deletion of E-Hobby WP:ROUTINE||WP:OR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4638 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Poray User:Vinegarymass911 19:56, 21 May 2018 (UTC) delete does not meet and . I am surprised by the number of votes saying oppose deletion and keep, which is a unique and rare way of voting Deletion of Anna Poray WP:NAUTHOR||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4639 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Weihrauch User:GiantSnowman 09:19, 14 February 2013 (UTC) delete fail and Deletion of Patrick Weihrauch WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4640 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allied technology of Command & Conquer User:Pete 19:35, 11 November 2007 (UTC) delete Game cruft. Not a single reference, let alone a reliable secondary source to establish the encyclopedic notability of this topic. must be satisified by an secondary source, this comes no where close. Transwiki it if you like, but this is essentially a fan essay, and just doesn't belong in an encyclopedia, be it paper or not Deletion of Allied technology of Command & Conquer WP:N||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4641 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben 10 Ultimate Alien: Fame User:MichaelQSchmidt 04:20, 25 September 2010 (UTC) keep And |work on sourcing through regular editing. The premiere episode of a notable series is often the most notable of all, as it sets the pace for all that follows in that series. And as the series itself is geting coveragehttp://www.google.com/search?q=%22Ben%2010%20Ultimate%20Alien%22&rls=com.microsoft:en-US&oe=utf8&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=nws:1&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wn and accquiring a fanbase,http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Ben+10+Ultimate+Alien%22&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.microsoft:en-US&ie=utf8&oe=utf8, that notability began with this premiere episode Deletion of Ben 10 Ultimate Alien: Fame WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +4642 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History on Fire User:Ddcm8991 18:18, 18 July 2016 (UTC) delete per nomination. Fails and Deletion of History on Fire WP:GNG||WP:42 Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4643 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Southeastern Conference football officiating controversy User:SportingFlyer 00:26, 14 May 2019 (UTC) delete you can probably write these sorts of articles for any season in any sport that gets covered in the media. The kicker for me on front is there is no article that covers the controversy as a whole, so there's a issue as well Deletion of 2009 Southeastern Conference football officiating controversy WP:GNG||WP:SYNTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4644 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gustavo Andres Hincapie User:AllyD 07:30, 5 June 2016 (UTC) delete A article supported by two passing mentions in El Tiempo and a link to the subject's Youtube channel. These confirm the subject as a man going about his business but I am seeing nothing to indicate encyclopaedic notability. (If this article does survive, it will need editing attention to achieve English language conformity and to remove ery Deletion of Gustavo Andres Hincapie :WP:SPA||:WP:PEACOCK Wikipedia:Single-purpose account 21 +4645 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalabhavan Road User:Animeshkulkarni 13:35, 23 July 2012 (UTC) comment Why not redirect? After all |they are cheap. This article can be redirected to Kochin. {{small|(I am gonna do that on almost all AfDs now Deletion of Kalabhavan Road WP:CHEAP Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap 74 +4646 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincenzo Cox User:Atama 22:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC) delete I supported the proposed deletion, but I also understand why you started this AfD, I myself took some time before I decided to support the deletion, it wasn't obvious. He certainly has an interesting past, but in deciding whether or not to support deleting the article I considered both and . Under general notability guidelines there should be significant coverage of him, but the most I can find were when he was included in a list of players as the result of a sporting event, no actual coverage of him specifically. Under the guideline for athletes, he either had to have performed at the highest amateur level (which would be the Olympic Games or something equivalent) or performed professionally. As to the former, he only made it to the trials for the '96 Olympics but didn't qualify. In 1995 and 1997 he also was at the trials for the USA Track & Field World Championship, but again only the trials. As to the latter, he tried out for a professional soccer career but didn't make it. There might be a place to chronicle the efforts of an athlete who ''almost'' succeeds but fails each time, but Wikipedia isn't the place Deletion of Vincenzo Cox WP:N||WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4647 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans Hagen User:Timneu22 13:56, 3 May 2010 (UTC) delete """No reliable web notability, and a """"strong keep"""" from the subject's friend is or . This article is rubbish and should be removed. &mdash""" Deletion of Hans Hagen WP:POV||WP:OR Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +4648 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jamaican Americans NONE NONE keep The rationale for deletion given in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of German Americans was #DIR. So these lists below should also be deleted if we want to be consistent Deletion of List of Jamaican Americans WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4649 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Ukraine train bus collision [[User talk:Jim Carter - Public|Jim Carter (''from public cyber'')]]''' 18:34, 28 July 2014 (UTC) keep needs some expansion. Event just passes . There are few more non English sources which can be added Deletion of 2014 Ukraine train bus collision WP:NEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4650 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokemon-Safari.com User:Haeleth 23:02, 4 September 2006 (UTC) delete """per .For those concerned about loss of information, let's be honest: the only ''information'' in the article can be summed up as """"Pokemon-Safari is a popular Pokemon fansite. It was founded in 1999 in Spanish. It became popular in 2006 when an English version was launched."""" There's no reason those three sentences need to be surrounded by an entire article of cruft, when the ''useful and verifiable information'' from this article could easily be made even more useful by putting it in some sensible context and adding those three sentences to a more general article on Pokemon fansites. &mdash""" Deletion of Pokemon-Safari.com WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4651 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Granny women User:SheepNotGoats 17:24, 17 December 2008 (UTC) keep The article needs some work, but it appears to be a legitimate historical term that appears in many |reliable sources (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rlz=1C1GGLS_en-USUS299US303&q=%22granny+women%22+appalachia&btnG=Search Google results minus all the porn). (Also, it would help if the nom's deletion rationale were more specific Deletion of Granny women WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4652 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indefinite logarithm User:D 00:51, 26 July 2012 (UTC) delete """For above reasons. Moreover the notion intends to formalize the notion of """"logarithm up to a multiplicative constant"""" but fails to give a workable definition. Thus, this is not only but also """ Deletion of Indefinite logarithm WP:OR||WP:FRINGE Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4653 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter J. Burien Jr. User:MelanieN 01:10, 12 June 2010 (UTC) delete """Non-notable. Subject has never held office, fails . He has never written a book, fails . He has a couple of patents, but that does not confer notability. He has occasionally been interviewed on the radio http://www.coasttocoastam.com/guest/burien-walter/43097. Other than that I could not find any significant or reliable coverage about him. Lots of stuff on blogs and such, but nothing from mainstream sources. Google News provides nothing at all for """"Walter R. Burien Jr."""" and only five hits for """"Walter Burien"""" - none of them from reliable or notable sources.http://www.google.com/search?num=50&hl=en&tbs=nws%3A1&q=%22Walter+Burien%22&btnG=Search&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=. Mr. Burien claims that Google gives 400,000 hits for Walter Burien, but that undoubtedly includes sites with just """"Walter"""" or just """"Burien"""". A search for """"Walter Burien"""" with the quotation marks actually provides 70,000 hits - many of them things like an e-mail he wrote to somebody. """"Walter Bubien"""" does no better. (He claims he changed his name out of fear of reprisal - reprisal for exactly what is not clear; he claims that he and his friends and the station he appeared on """"came under attack,"""" but no trace of that attack can be found on Google.) The article itself is a mess, a cross between resumé and narrative essay, but it could be rewritten if the subject himself was notable per Wikipedia's standards - which in my opinion he is not""" Deletion of Walter J. Burien Jr. WP:POLITICIAN||WP:AUTHOR||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4654 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeromy Green User:Walwal20 16:50, 10 October 2020 (UTC) delete I reached same conclusions as nom. Has a very local importance, so does not meet . The fact that he landed one of Tony Hawk's tricks can be placed in Tony Hawk's article Deletion of Jeromy Green WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4655 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New York City housing crisis User:BenKuykendall 04:23, 11 December 2018 (UTC) comment """I think this is more of a |neutrality issue than a notability one. However many facts and figures about housing in NY we have, regardless of the sources, we as Wikipedia editors cannot conclude there is a """"crisis"""". Instead, we need to present the arguments and conclusions of experts. The San Francisco housing shortage article is a very good example of what to do: the first paragraph includes the sentence {{tq|Late San Francisco mayor Ed Lee has called the shortage a """"housing crisis"""",4 and news reports have said that addressing the shortage is the mayor's """"top priority"""".5}} Properly sources attributions like this are essential to maintaining neutrality in this article""" Deletion of New York City housing crisis WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +4656 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No borders User:Coredesat 09:57, 24 June 2006 (UTC) delete fails , unverifiable Deletion of No borders WP:NOR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4657 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Safdar Hussain User:Edison 15:30, 27 May 2011 (UTC) delete """The references do not satisfy the need tor significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources needed to satisfy and , the standards for notability for bio articles in Wikipedia.There are two citations to a broken link (article not found) from the local police department, which might not be considered """"independent"""" and a link to some webpage related to some mall, which not only does not mention him, but which would not be considered a """"reliable source"""" for biographical information about historical figures. There is mention of a book, but no bibliographical information which would allow one to decide if it is a reliable and independent source. Lots of laudatory assertions made here by Wikipedia editors are not at all effective in establishing notability. Were there other books, newspapers and magazine articles from independent and reliable sources""" Deletion of Safdar Hussain WP:N||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4658 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/State leaders by year User:Davewild 19:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC) keep This meets (in chronological order and 'lists can be used as a table of contents'), it is part of a wikiproject and has red links showing which years have been done. A disucssion has been ongoing on splitting which I would support as it is overlong but that is not an issue for AFD Deletion of State leaders by year WP:LIST Wikipedia:Lists 36 +4659 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Lucas (21st Century Ohio politician) User:JohnCD 12:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC) delete it only made the papers because he was a candidate: per that doesn't give him notability, and no other notability is suggested Deletion of Robert Lucas (21st Century Ohio politician) WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4660 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahroz Education System Saroke User:Spiderone 12:18, 10 November 2018 (UTC) delete clear failure of Deletion of Shahroz Education System Saroke WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4661 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acres of Dead Space Cadets User:Richwales 21:08, 27 July 2011 (UTC) delete Only one source (and of uncertain quality); album evidently didn't make any national charts or honours; thus fails Deletion of Acres of Dead Space Cadets WP:NALBUMS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4662 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megan Kufeld (2nd nomination) User:Pharaoh 01:58, 15 May 2016 (UTC) keep Passes Deletion of Megan Kufeld (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4663 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jana Sanchez User:Less 11:20, 20 January 2021 (UTC) delete The number of sources cited is not the only proof of notability. The subject is widely covered above all as a candidate, who did not make it all the way to the Congress. This she fails . She would have passed only if at least 3 independent reliable sources covered her in detail APART from the election process. However this is not the case - all of the sources are tied to her activities performed within the election process. So in my opinion, she is not eligible for an article Deletion of Jana Sanchez WP:NPOL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4664 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jalapa Devi Primary School,Terathum User:Noyster 08:45, 7 April 2015 (UTC) merge to Ishibu per Deletion of Jalapa Devi Primary School,Terathum WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +4665 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Decibel Devils User:Vegaswikian 06:45, 6 January 2006 (UTC) delete unless it is clear that they meet . Right now it does not appear that they do Deletion of Decibel Devils WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4666 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giant (Clash of Clans) User:Gamingforfun365 06:24, 4 December 2016 (UTC) delete they all fail and otability Deletion of Giant (Clash of Clans) WP:GAMEGUIDE||WP:N Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4667 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Actuarial Outpost User:Kicking222 15:32, 19 May 2006 (UTC) delete per many of the editors above. The NY Times article means nothing- it ''mentions'' actuarialoutpost. It's not like the article is ''about'' the site. The site fails , period Deletion of Actuarial Outpost WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4668 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/County (China) User:Snotbot 19:12, 17 November 2011 (UTC) comment This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (|step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 November 17 Deletion of County (China) WP:AFDHOWTO Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +4669 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bottle knife User:WilyD 14:15, 30 August 2006 (UTC) delete Neologism that fails ... my Grandmother used to call these something else Deletion of Bottle knife WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4670 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISO/TC 37/SC 2 User:DMacks 19:19, 27 June 2014 (UTC) merge per The Banner. We have a nice (but not overly-long) ISO/TC 37 article on the committee that could have a sentence or two about each subcommittee's scope and any key actions. But it doesn't seem like the subcomittee itself is independently notable. This suite of articles (there are several other /SC as well) seems too detailed, getting towards of corporate structure and mostly just a way of collecting and organizating links to the various ISO standards each develops. That last idea sounds like a great scope of List of International Organization for Standardization standards as a unified and organized list Deletion of ISO/TC 37/SC 2 WP:NOTDIR Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4671 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of commercial goods allowed/banned for import into Gaza User:Tarc 11:02, 3 July 2010 (UTC) comment This is about due for a close today, and I;d like to urge the closer to look at whether or not reliable sources confer notability on the specific list of goods or is the notability conferred on the general fact that there is an import/export ban. Many of the keep calls see no difference between the two. I feel it is the later, and note the analogy to the US' Cuban embargo above; the embargo is notable, and examples of what is banned are cited by RS in support of that notability, but to put an exhausting list of what ''is'' banned is clear-cut IMO. We are not a repository for spreadsheets, and the full laundry list of info could either be accessible via an external link or perhaps if it is published by an NGO, it can go to wikisource Deletion of List of commercial goods allowed/banned for import into Gaza WP:INDISCRIMINATE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4672 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STQ-3 (band) User:mr 04:48, 12 June 2008 (UTC) delete per , when you can't find them on Amazon.com or some other online music store I think it's a pretty safe bet |N hasn't been achieved yet Deletion of STQ-3 (band) WP:MUSIC||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4673 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University College of Engineering, Kariavattom User:Bearian 19:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC) keep it appears to be a small but real college, which we keep |absent a need to start from scratch. Only problem I see is a possible lack of accreditation Deletion of University College of Engineering, Kariavattom WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +4674 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Una Healy User:GaGaOohLaLa 20:20, 25 November 2009 (UTC) delete these three singers have no notability outside of The Saturdays, therefore failing Deletion of Una Healy WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4675 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuuka Akama User:श 18:51, 30 September 2018 (UTC) delete no evidence of qualifying the requirement of Deletion of Yuuka Akama WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4676 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelley Gulledge User:Brewcrewer 23:22, 28 July 2008 (UTC) delete Bios in encyclopedia are intended for people that are widely accepted as the elite in their profession. This person is not a notable baseball player. There are thousands upon thousands of baseball players that have accomplished as much as him. If he is equal to thousands upon thousands of other players it doesn't make any sense for there to be an article about him in an encyclopedia. For those editors that won't accept an argument at an afd discussion that doesn't include wikilinked abbreviations here goes: '''Delete'''. No coverage in , thus not meeting . is a Wikiproject, thus any notability standard they come up with doesn't trump Deletion of Kelley Gulledge WP:RS||WP:BIO||WP:BB||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4677 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indiefeed User:Stifle 00:09, 26 December 2005 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Indiefeed WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4678 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Bogtrotter User:Stifle 19:38, 7 September 2008 (UTC) delete I still don't think this meets the requirements. Merging fine too Deletion of Bruce Bogtrotter WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4679 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impeachment of Donald Trump User:Gluons12 19:05, 11 November 2016 (UTC) delete as |Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Doesn't seem well-sourced enough at this point Deletion of Impeachment of Donald Trump WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4680 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jody St. Michael User:Clarityfiend 23:18, 5 June 2016 (UTC) delete for failing with insufficiently notable credits. Longevity in the business isn't enough (even if she's the gorilla your dreams, Montanabw Deletion of Jody St. Michael WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4681 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to play deathmetal User:S 23:19, 31 January 2009 (UTC) delete It's (a) a howto, (b) an essay, and (c) |contains serious inaccuracies Deletion of How to play deathmetal WP:BOLLOCKS Wikipedia:Complete bollocks 62 +4682 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anuwat Nuchit User:WikiVirusC 19:29, 21 February 2018 (UTC) keep Passes , as shown by the match summary report provided above from a competitive game in a Deletion of Anuwat Nuchit WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4683 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Take Control (Dangerous Muse album) User:Lightburst 01:22, 15 November 2019 (UTC) delete I think this is Deletion of Take Control (Dangerous Muse album) WP:PROMOTION Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4684 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anderson de Carvalho Barbosa User:Camw 03:08, 18 April 2009 (UTC) keep Passes thlete. The article needs significant improvement (some references at the very least) but it isn't subject to deletion for notability Deletion of Anderson de Carvalho Barbosa WP:A Wikipedia:Attribution 34 +4685 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark A. O'Neill User:Ubelowme 16:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC) keep """According to (#3), which I believe to be the relevant standard, O'Neill's membership in the Royal Entomological Society and the Royal Astronomical Society are sufficient to demonstrate |notability. Reading the notes at , I can't think these are """"minor and non-notable societies"""". I didn't take this analysis further; possibly someone will want to get into citation metrics, etc""" Deletion of Mark A. O'Neill WP:ACADEMIC||WP:N||WP:ACADEMIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4686 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donnie Hogan User:Edwardx 22:11, 13 December 2016 (UTC) delete Fails . There are insufficient in-depth secondary sources Deletion of Donnie Hogan WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4687 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanae Shimomura User:Griseum 12:30, 5 August 2010 (UTC) delete No evidence that there was enough discussion of this event to transform the subject from |NEWSWORTHY to ote|NOTEWORTHY Deletion of Sanae Shimomura WP:NOTNEWS||WP:N Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4688 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zecherism User:Nerdluck34 00:22, 24 September 2008 (UTC) delete Wikipedia is not for |religious cults made up whilst bored in school one day. Absolute rubbish Deletion of Zecherism WP:MADEUP Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +4689 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eurovision Song Contest 2010 User:This 23:00, 16 May 2009 (UTC) comment this AfD was, in |good faith, speedily closed; I reverted the speedy closure, and request that an admin review my actions. Cheers Deletion of Eurovision Song Contest 2010 WP:AGF Wikipedia:Assume good faith 53 +4690 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ARDOR User:GermanJoe 13:54, 24 March 2018 (UTC) delete or draftify and AfC) - mentions and coverage in non-reliable sources are not sufficient to establish notability. It seems simply for this topic (and repeated arguments are invalid for such discussions). I would support Thomas' alternative suggestion to draftify the article to improve it, when better sources become available with in-depth coverage. The entire article needs an almost complete rewrite though to remove all the trivia, irrelevant tangents, low-quality sources and non-neutral language - most of the current content is not suitable for a dispassionate non-promotional article. It should also go through AfC then to allow reviewing by an unbiased editor Deletion of ARDOR WP:TOOSOON||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +4691 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ollie Stanbridge User:Malcolmxl5 11:48, 27 April 2008 (UTC) delete Not notable per thlete Deletion of Ollie Stanbridge WP:A Wikipedia:Attribution 34 +4692 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Lowe (2nd nomination) User:Abductive 01:34, 24 November 2010 (UTC) delete Fails and as sacrificial lamb candidate, fails Deletion of Ben Lowe (2nd nomination) WP:AUTHOR||WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4693 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Rock Shooter [[User talk:159.182.1.4|talk]]) 12:14, 5 October 2009 (UTC) comment It does seem like there's SOMETHING here though. There are figurines being made, people in Japan cosplaying the character, there's apparently a CD somebody put out... an anime series probably falls under , but perhaps further research is in order? Special:Contributions/159.182.1.4|159.182.1.4 Deletion of Black Rock Shooter WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4694 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bambang Parmanto User:Coredesat 20:55, 24 June 2006 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Bambang Parmanto WP:PROFTEST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4695 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cornelia Chase Brant User:Enos733 20:27, 10 July 2021 (UTC) keep Easily passes Deletion of Cornelia Chase Brant WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4696 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark L. Hunt User:Lubbad85 01:51, 27 March 2019 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Mark L. Hunt WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4697 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdelrahman H. Elsayed User:Nsk92 11:04, 19 October 2020 (UTC) delete per nom. All the awards listed in the article are indeed student and trainee level awards and don't contribute to academic notability under . https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=FqL387UAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao GoogleScholar gives him h-index of just 2, with his GScholar profile still listing him as a PhD candidate. Probably a fresh PhD Deletion of Abdelrahman H. Elsayed WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4698 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Hunt (professor) User:David 19:31, 26 December 2017 (UTC) keep """His Chancellor's Professor title (https://carleton.ca/secretariat/wp-content/uploads/Chancellors-Professors-Policy.pdf policy on this title) gives him a pass of #C5, and I suspect that one can find sufficient reviews of his books to also pass . AfD is not for cleanup, and calling this a """"vanity article"""" is both a |personal attack and a violation of , but I removed the list of courses as I agree they are non-encyclopedic""" Deletion of Alan Hunt (professor) WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR||WP:NPA||WP:BLP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4699 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/5 Star Grave User:Adjkasi 13:09, 30 June 2012 (UTC) delete because it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion: |CSD A9 Deletion of 5 Star Grave WP:A9 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +4700 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of female Egyptologists user:Andrew 13:10, 27 December 2016 (UTC) keep the list but disable the bot. The list should be kept because the topic passes – see ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jWltAAAAMAAJ Women Travellers in the Near East'' or ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=MsXQEkPLf-0C You Can Be a Woman Egyptologist'', for example. The bot should be blocked or disabled because the note on the article indicates that it has been set up to always revert to its preferred version and that is contrary to Deletion of List of female Egyptologists WP:LISTN||WP:EDITWAR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4701 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lukas Spalvis User:GiantSnowman 18:35, 12 September 2013 (UTC) delete fail and Deletion of Lukas Spalvis WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4702 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canon EOS R2 User:4meter4 00:42, 4 March 2020 (UTC) delete per nom. A clear case of Deletion of Canon EOS R2 WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +4703 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily L. Spratt (2nd nomination) User:Bakazaka 15:21, 31 July 2018 (UTC) delete per thorough nom and previous discussions. Fails , and lacks an award, position, or impact that would pass Deletion of Emily L. Spratt (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4704 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Berkley User:Mattinbgn 22:58, 3 June 2008 (UTC) delete Arguably breaches in that the article seems to accuse her of misrepresenting herself. On top of this she is marginally notable at best Deletion of Susan Berkley WP:ATTACK Wikipedia:Attack page 13 +4705 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Chukwuma Obi User:GiantSnowman 04:29, 9 July 2010 (UTC) delete fails and , recreate if/when player becomes notable Deletion of Joel Chukwuma Obi WP:ATHLETE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4706 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unniceness User:Marasmusine 17:28, 26 February 2008 (UTC) delete per above and Wikipedia is |not a dictionary. If the nominator agrees, I would also suggest adding Unnice to this AfD Deletion of Unniceness WP:DICTDEF Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +4707 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalanjukittiya Thankam User:Shushugah 15:14, 10 September 2021 (UTC) keep Specifically B7 of says: ''{{green|Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better-sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lede Deletion of Kalanjukittiya Thankam WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +4708 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elctrikchair User:Doc 05:01, 4 July 2009 (UTC) delete WP:NOTMYSPACE|Wikipedia is not MySpace. Band is NN and fails spectacularly. Article reads like a |press release Deletion of Elctrikchair WP:MUSIC||WP:ADVERT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4709 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belmont Anti-Tank Ditch User:Nick 12:08, 20 September 2011 (UTC) keep The Lake Macquarie Council website states that this has been heritage listed: http://www.lakemac.com.au/downloads/2009_02_16_stand_pages%2082-118.pdf (see page 33) as well as several other parts of the fortifications built in the area during World War II. Defensive works such as this were highly unusual in Australia during World War II, and I'd be amazed if offline books didn't also discuss this. That said, this is pretty marginal from a perspective, and would be better covered as part of an article on the defences of the Newcastle region rather than a stand-alone Deletion of Belmont Anti-Tank Ditch WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4710 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leathes Prior User:Bearian 20:36, 30 January 2014 (UTC) keep WP:AGF|assuming that everything can be |verified by |reliable sources, this passes Deletion of Leathes Prior WP:V||WP:RS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4711 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unlawfully killed transgender people User:Location 13:07, 30 September 2015 (UTC) delete per , specifically . Unfortunately, hate crimes are relatively common and our goal should not be to catalog them. I agree with those that believe the topic should be addressed in Wikipedia and it is. Notable examples that meet (i.e. pass ) can be discussed in Violence against LGBT people or in appropriate sub-articles (e.g. History of violence against LGBT people in the United States Deletion of List of unlawfully killed transgender people WP:WWIN||WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:EVENT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4712 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of New Gods User:Piotrus 09:13, 19 November 2020 (UTC) delete I thought about redirecting this to New Gods but why bother? The title is unlikely to be search for, and this seems to fail / otherwise. Nothing to merge, as this is almost totally unreferenced, too Deletion of List of New Gods WP:GNG||WP:NLIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4713 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mexico–Serbia relations User:Edison 06:18, 5 May 2009 (UTC) delete """After 6 months, it is still a pathetic stub with no references showing notability. How many books or journal article have been written on the topic of """"Relations between Mexico and Serbia?"""" Seems like a mere directory listing, which violates """ Deletion of Mexico–Serbia relations WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4714 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pratisaad - The Response User:Atlantic306 21:28, 30 October 2018 (UTC) delete all three as there are hoax concerns that are proven and in any case they do not pass and , thanks Deletion of Pratisaad - The Response WP:GNG||WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4715 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brent Britton User:Uncle 02:59, 5 February 2014 (UTC) comment The reasons the nominator listed for deletion |can be fixed without deleting the article. --| Deletion of Brent Britton WP:DELETIONISNOTCLEANUP Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +4716 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dubrovnik Annals User:onel5969 13:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC) delete Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to show it passes Deletion of Dubrovnik Annals WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4717 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AustinFromNEW User:Narthring 05:12, 31 October 2009 (UTC) delete The article's references do not establish notability per any of the points in , nor was I able to find anything after searching online. There are many examples of the subject's work but I couldn't find anything that seemed to indicate notability. A third-party reference treating the subject or something similar would help, if such a reference exists Deletion of AustinFromNEW WP:ARTIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4718 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Michael Afable User:onel5969 12:28, 1 November 2015 (UTC) keep He's had significant roles in at least 3 films (''Akeelah and the Bee'', ''To Save a Life'', and ''Hardflip''), to of which are notable by wiki standards, and the third might be. In addition he had a featured, although smaller, role in another notable film, ''Boogie Town''. ''One Warm Night'' was a webseries in which he had the leading role. I didn't do a search for , but to me, he barely squeaks by with this resume as meeting Deletion of Sean Michael Afable WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4719 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nate Garner User:Northamerica1000 02:34, 16 June 2016 (UTC) keep Presumed notable per . E.g. http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/miami-dolphins/sfl-dolphins-release-veteran-offensive-lineman-nate-garner-20150302-story.html, http://sports.yahoo.com/news/odrick-garner-show-versatility-dolphins-002021658--nfl.html, http://www.sportsnet.ca/football/nfl/offensive-lineman-garner-re-signs-with-dolphins/, etc Deletion of Nate Garner WP:NGRIDIRON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4720 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Khawam User:Edison 17:07, 21 November 2012 (UTC) delete Wikipedia is |not a newspaper, and has different standards for who we have articles about. There have been lots of breathless and prurient tabloidish articles about the breaking news story. That is not the stuff a good encyclopedia is made of. Clear case of . If she and her sister in the future become as frequently on the covers of supermarket tabloids as the Kardashians, then we can reconsider Deletion of Natalie Khawam WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4721 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Downs (writer) User:DiamondRemley39 13:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC) keep as he sure meets . Just getting started with improvements--all of which have been available on the open internet so far. could have been stronger. Also: AfD is not cleanup Deletion of Greg Downs (writer) WP:NAUTHOR||WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4722 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Cooper (electronica musician) User:Lawrencekhoo 06:53, 28 December 2012 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Max Cooper (electronica musician) WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4723 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avijit Arya User:Melcous 21:56, 18 December 2017 (UTC) delete per nomination. A source shows up a bunch of |self promotion, much like this seems to be Deletion of Avijit Arya WP:BEFORE||WP:UGC Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +4724 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professional wrestling attacks User:Yukichigai 22:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC) keep """The nominator is blissfully ignoring the section of on primary sources, specifically for works of |fiction. (Or works of kayfabe if you prefer) All of these articles meet at levels anywhere from """"just barely"""" to """"with flying colors"""", as each can be cited to various primary sources, e.g. the specific wrestling event(s) in which the move appeared. Some could use more overt citations, but remember that """"inline"""" citations (e.g. """"used by wrestler X in WrestlingEvent Y on wrestler Z"""") qualify. Also take a look at Y:V%26A#Verifiability: Citing the Primary Source|my repeatedly used arguments on citing fiction from the primary source. As to , I agree that ''some'' articles contain ''some'' OR content, but this is neither a majority of the articles nor a majority of their content. This at most warrants a cleanup. Finally, we come to : every one of these moves is or has been a """"signature"""" move by more than one major, mainstream wrestler. Notability is therefore asserted by the repeated use of the move by prominent figures in wrestling media. -- |Y'''|""" Deletion of Professional wrestling attacks WP:RS||WP:FICT||WP:V||WP:OR||WP:N||WP:IKNOWBEST Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4725 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Collins User:Location 18:38, 9 June 2012 (UTC) delete Fails . There appears to be a lack of significant coverage in reliable sources Deletion of Matt Collins WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4726 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terrence Keith Ashwin User:Piotrus 21:21, 26 June 2014 (UTC) delete No significant coverage to satisfy per nom Deletion of Terrence Keith Ashwin WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4727 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Walkes User:Richwales 01:06, 21 August 2011 (UTC) delete per . No evidence of ''notability'' (see to understand what this means on Wikipedia) via any ''independent'' reliable sources discussing the subject or his writings (please carefully read to understand what this means). I did a Google search but found only stuff from Masonic sources and/or the Phylaxis Society, and sites selling Walkes' books. If anyone is aware of sources which would suffice to establish Wikipedia notability, please add them ASAP Deletion of Joseph Walkes WP:PEOPLE||WP:PEOPLE||WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4728 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 NCRHA Division I Collegiate Roller Hockey National Championships User:TonyBallioni 20:42, 9 January 2017 (UTC) delete per DanielRigal. Unreferenced lists of subjects that don't really add anything to the encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, let's delete these per Deletion of 2008 NCRHA Division I Collegiate Roller Hockey National Championships WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4729 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Law User:Spiderone 20:59, 4 May 2021 (UTC) keep the coverage in ''Scotsman'' and ''Six Nations Rugby'' is just about enough for in my opinion Deletion of Sarah Law WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4730 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manon von Gerkan User:Mkativerata 02:22, 16 March 2010 (UTC) delete Sources are nowhere near sufficient to meet the dual test of ''reliability'' and ''significant coverage''. What has been presented so far?http://www.fashionmodeldirectory.com/models/Manon_von+Gerkan/ This is a PR profile - who knows who puts the information on there; http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/swimsuit/collection/models/manon_von_gerkan.html this has no meaning; http://www.perfectpeople.net/biography/119/manon-von-gerkan.htm this has no content; and it is well established that IMDB is not reliable. We cannot have a reliable article about this subject because there is no coverage in reliable sources. An encyclopaedia is only as good as its sources. That's why ''reliability'' must be given its proper weight in . Still awaiting any genuine coverage of the subject in reliable secondary sources Deletion of Manon von Gerkan WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4731 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glam Philippines User:Bearian 18:52, 9 December 2016 (UTC) delete """They lost me at """"fusion company"""". And by """"lost me"""", I mean this is |fairly blatant spam. I'll verify in the ground next week, but if's deleted by then, no worries. ''Maligayang Pasko""" Deletion of Glam Philippines WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Spam 26 +4732 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenny Quinn User:Nikki311 20:58, 1 November 2009 (UTC) delete fails , as she has not worked at the top level of her sport. Also seems to fail , as I couldn't find anything on her modeling career Deletion of Jenny Quinn WP:ATHLETE||WP:ENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4733 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stotfield User:Gene93k 13:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC) keep It is not an independent settlement '''now'''. It originally was according to the Lossiemouth article. otability of settlements does not expire with annexation Deletion of Stotfield WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4734 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redneck monday User:Evb 16:53, 17 October 2007 (UTC) delete per nom. #MADEUP Deletion of Redneck monday WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4735 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guitar Hero 6 User:Joe 19:19, 9 November 2009 (UTC) delete Per Deletion of Guitar Hero 6 WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4736 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wonder Woman's Power User:IslaySolomon 07:09, 7 December 2006 (UTC) delete Redundant |OR |cruft Deletion of Wonder Woman's Power WP:OR||WP:CRUFT Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4737 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Hayden Jr. User:Unscintillating 22:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC) comment nbsp; The policy ATD prevails over the policy DEL8 when there is a -M|merge target that allows a policy-required |preservation of content contributions.  Deletion of John Hayden Jr. WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +4738 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belobogism User:JohnCD 15:28, 4 August 2012 (UTC) delete no |reliable |independent sources to indicate that this is |notable, or indeed more than something FT|made up one day. If not a hoax, it is at best OR|original research Deletion of Belobogism WP:RS||WP:IS||WP:N||WP:NFT||WP:NOR Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4739 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yersinia (band) User:Wisdom89 05:07, 13 March 2008 (UTC) delete http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Yersinia+%22black+metal%22+germany&btnG=Search I see nothing but flimsy mentions at blogspot, myspace, metalarchives, etc..etc.. Fails Deletion of Yersinia (band) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4740 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parent revocation User:Yunshui 09:11, 24 September 2012 (UTC) delete I actually deleted an earlier version of this owing to its hefty copyright violation of http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/se/lr/om010609.asp this letter, not to mention violating , , , and . This version is no better. The author seems determined to push their article into Wikipedia (I've just reported them at ANI for issuing a legal threat on their talk page in response to the last deletion of it), and clearly |isn't here for any constructive purpose Deletion of Parent revocation WP:SOAP||WP:NOTREPOSITORY||WP:NOTMANUAL||WP:ESSAY||WP:OR||WP:NOTHERE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4741 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loki installers for linux gamers User:Starblind 17:07, 25 November 2009 (UTC) delete Oh man, you know an article is in big trouble when the first reference is to a forum post. Anyway, delete per , , , etc Deletion of Loki installers for linux gamers WP:WEB||WP:N||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4742 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damayan Buluseño (2nd nomination) User:Citrusbowler 13:48, 17 June 2013 (UTC) delete Fails and . I couldn't find any independent sources Deletion of Damayan Buluseño (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4743 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burnt City (Band) User:Dane 11:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC) delete Definitely fails Deletion of Burnt City (Band) WP:NMUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4744 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Australian rules football junior leagues User:Ajf773 09:37, 6 October 2020 (UTC) delete A list of non notable clubs and also applies Deletion of List of Australian rules football junior leagues WP:NOTDIR Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4745 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meisha Johnson User:WilliamJE 10:34, 21 May 2018 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Meisha Johnson WP:JOURNALIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4746 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Second Fergie Album User:Rjd0060 02:04, 29 September 2007 (UTC) delete Per and that article is horribly written (at least couple sentences that make up the article are Deletion of Untitled Second Fergie Album WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4747 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Shepherd User:Robin99 16:01, 14 February 2007 (UTC) delete per nom, essentially a vanity article and as above doesn't comply with Deletion of Jason Shepherd WP:AUTO Wikipedia:Autobiography 75 +4748 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Command & Conquer: Red Alert 3 (second) User:FreelanceWizard 10:32, 6 December 2005 (UTC) delete as it appears to violate #General|Criteria for Speedy Deletion G4 (no recreation of deleted material). I am getting terribly tired of people doing that. It shows very bad faith on their part Deletion of Command & Conquer: Red Alert 3 (second) WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +4749 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madhubanti Bagchi User:Bejnar 05:29, 6 July 2017 (UTC) delete this fails |NARTIST and well as |GNG Deletion of Madhubanti Bagchi WP:NARTIST||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4750 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ikhfanul Alam User:R96Skinner 16:13, 5 September 2019 (UTC) keep NFOOTY pass, career ongoing - currently with Arema in Indonesia's Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues|FPL-listed Liga 1 (Indonesia)|Liga 1 - which is enough for keep, based on past cases: e.g. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mats van Kins|AfD/Mats van Kins, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Karani|AfD/Sean Karani and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danish Irfan Azman|AfD/Danish Irfan Azman. Enough out there for GNG anyway: https://suryamalang.tribunnews.com/2019/01/15/ikhfanul-alam-terpilih-sebagai-gelandang-arema-fc-mimpi-yang-jadi-kenyataan, https://www.medcom.id/bola/liga-indonesia/lKY6DQWN-jalan-panjang-ikhfanul-alam-sebelum-gabung-arema, https://www.tribunnews.com/superskor/2019/01/16/ikhfanul-alam-anggota-polisi-yang-jadi-pemain-sepak-bola-hati-saya-ingin-bermain-di-arema-fc, https://www.malangpostonline.com/read/15428/usai-insiden-berdarah-ikhfanul-alam-siap-main-lagi. No Deletion of Ikhfanul Alam WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +4751 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Lee (politician) User:Cullen328 22:06, 24 May 2014 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Chad Lee (politician) WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4752 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zulfiqar Ahmad Naqshbandi User:AaqibAnjum 14:20, 25 August 2020 (UTC) keep a clear pass of per https://www.worldcat.org/identities/lccn-no2002108108/ his books, and a leading Sufi shaykh of Naqshbandi oder. Copy edited, expanded the article with some references Deletion of Zulfiqar Ahmad Naqshbandi WP:NAUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4753 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La migra (game) User:TenPoundHammer 20:43, 5 August 2007 (UTC) delete per Deletion of La migra (game) WP:NFT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +4754 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Levon Khachigian User:Forward 10:56, 14 August 2013 (UTC) keep This alleged case of academic misconduct is certainly notable, but it is very important that |Wikipedia's policies on biographies of living people be carefully followed. All sources must be reliable and verifiable, and this article must in no way preempt the findings of any investigation. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty. It is important that proportionate space be given to the major viewpoints and any and all libelous material be removed Deletion of Levon Khachigian WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +4755 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Star Secondary School (2nd nomination) User:Lemongirl942 03:47, 24 July 2016 (UTC) comment vote Updated with stronger reasoning below) Fails . While I generally support , this is only if the school is a verified accredited school. I have not found a single reliable source which indicates that the school exists and is accredited. Till such sources are found, this is a delete Deletion of Mount Star Secondary School (2nd nomination) WP:V||WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4756 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breakwater Marina User:Mayalld 15:39, 2 September 2008 (UTC) delete part of a tranche of articles seeking to create a directory of largely nn marinas, contrary to Deletion of Breakwater Marina WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4757 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deborah R Williams User:Xtifr 22:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC) delete per A7 or G11 (either could apply). Otherwise, '''Delete''' per nom Deletion of Deborah R Williams WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +4758 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Warren (South Carolina politician) User:Firefly 08:16, 18 June 2018 (UTC) delete """fails (""""Just being ... an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability""""), and there isn't the |significant independent coverage to meet the |GNG either. As stated above, notability is about the here and now, not what could be. If the subject is elected, then the article can be recreated (and this content could be |undeleted if desired""" Deletion of John Warren (South Carolina politician) WP:NPOL||WP:42||WP:GNG||WP:REFUND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4759 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desktop Scientific User:Ottawa4ever 18:14, 12 August 2010 (UTC) delete Does seem to read as promotional. No real establishment of secondary sourcing either. As the article stands currrently fails Deletion of Desktop Scientific WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4760 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mastan Malli User:WilyD 12:34, 12 November 2008 (UTC) keep notability established |the usual way. I see no reason to make an exception in this case; rather, we should apply the usual standards Deletion of Mastan Malli WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4761 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weightlifters at the 2007 World Weightlifting Championships User:Lugnuts 10:29, 17 September 2016 (UTC) keep A clearly defined list of notable individuals. This would tie in with , specifically . The nom's reason is also very poor, citing the essay on cruft Deletion of List of weightlifters at the 2007 World Weightlifting Championships WP:CLN||WP:NOTDUP Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates 5 +4762 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shit, Shower and Shave User:Redfarmer 12:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC) delete fails #DICT. Possibly could be merged into List of U.S. Army acronyms and expressions Deletion of Shit, Shower and Shave WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4763 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clacket Lane User:Tony 20:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC) delete the record label has three bands, of which these guys are referred to as the 'big project'; with no albums out, and minimal outside references, they just don't meet at this time Deletion of Clacket Lane WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4764 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troll in popular culture NONE NONE delete """oh come now. Calling the deletion of articles like this """"vandalism"""" shows a serious lack of |good faith here. I mean, this is just a list of trivia related to trolls. It isn't even an article; it's a list -- and the only inclusions criterion is """"vaguely related to trolls, or things that look like trolls, or things associated with trolls"""". I mean""" Deletion of Troll in popular culture WP:AGF Wikipedia:Assume good faith 53 +4765 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rod Belcher User:Ejgreen77 23:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC) keep per Paulmcdonald and Cbl62. Good-faith article expansion has improved the article to the point where it meets Deletion of Rod Belcher WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4766 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming (3rd nomination) User:John 09:33, 26 October 2009 (UTC) delete """It is quite a stretch to apply a single stereotypical """"List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming"""" to a group who holds a wide variety of opinions on a wide spectrum of """"opposition"""" (as opposed to disagreement--a quite different issue even the title is blatantly ) with ''certain'' scientific assessments. Many of the scientists support """"other"""" mainstream and peer-reviewed scientific assessments. Claiming it's a ''majority-held'' scientific viewpoint might be debated (and is in separate WP articles, but that's not the phrase the title uses. It is useless to try to stuff a cadre of scientists into a one-size-fits-all title like this one. What I think the current discussion will illustrate is how it is impossible to delete articles once inserted regardless of how tenuous the proposition it purports to try to address. Might as well call it """"List of scientists supporting different scientific assessments of global warming""""--at least that one doesn't require an OR/POV personal definition of terms""" Deletion of List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming (3rd nomination) WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4767 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobby Tamkin User:Harlowraman 23:32, 8 August 2007 (UTC) delete does not seem to meet and Deletion of Bobby Tamkin WP:B Wikipedia:Bots 91 +4768 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Probit model for panel data with heterogeneity and endogenous explanatory variables (2nd nomination) User:Nsk92 21:43, 17 October 2019 (UTC) delete """Written so increadibly badly that the article is incomprehensible even to the experts, so much so that the page is a borderline case. I am a professional mathematician myself and I have no idea what the page is talking about. There are no definitions of any kind, the topic of the article is not coherently described, the various quantities/notations/variables used are not defined or explained, and there are no clearly idetifiable and properly formulated mathematical statements. Basically just a bunch of incoherent semi-mathematical verbiage. In mathematics we refer to this kind of text as """"not even wrong""" Deletion of Probit model for panel data with heterogeneity and endogenous explanatory variables (2nd nomination) WP:A1 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +4769 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The French Democracy (2nd nomination) User:MichaelQSchmidt 07:04, 30 January 2009 (UTC) keep IMDB does not confer notability. Plenty of Reliable Sources have. No need to delete as it is now a matter of Deletion of The French Democracy (2nd nomination) WP:CLEANUP Wikipedia:Cleanup 29 +4770 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of 2007 albums User:Northamerica1000 19:45, 6 August 2015 (UTC) keep """per relative to the respective categories for the article topics. These articles provide more information than categories can ever provide, and as per , categories and lists covering the same topics are considered to be """"complementary, not inappropriately duplicative""" Deletion of List of 2007 albums WP:NOTDUP Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates 5 +4771 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drop Goblin User:TheTic123 19:53, 4 June 2013 (UTC) keep As far as literal and needed criteria to be eligible for Wiki, though not a large amount, he does, in fact meet the music artist notability criteria '''Criteria for musicians and ensembles - #5: Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels)''' along with releasing and working with other notable and page approved artists on noted various indie labels and retail store releases connected with Reid Speed and Nick Pittsinger as well as Excision (musician)|Excision. He is also linked to other notable artist's pages, as well as worked with the very notable band Alestorm more than once. And that's just by looking on the artist page. I have also seen an article on him on FEARnet, the biggest horror/dark themed music site on the planet. To be honest administrators, I have seen other pages with far less that have lasted for years on Wiki. I would like to see his page remain and grow. Hopefully my input helps Deletion of Drop Goblin WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4772 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Collins User:Clarityfiend 01:41, 9 June 2012 (UTC) delete per nom. No ''independent'' references that I can see. is a bad argument to make. The only possibly notable Matt Collins I could dig up is the Yugoslavian in the Rockabilly Hall of Famehttp://www.rockabillyhall.com/MasterIndex.html Deletion of Matt Collins WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +4773 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soviet technology of Command & Conquer User:Pete 19:36, 11 November 2007 (UTC) delete Game cruft. Not a single reference, let alone a reliable secondary source to establish the encyclopedic notability of this topic. must be satisified by an secondary source, this comes no where close. Transwiki it if you like, but this is essentially a fan essay, and just doesn't belong in an encyclopedia, be it paper or not Deletion of Soviet technology of Command & Conquer WP:N||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4774 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Ansari User:Montanabw 07:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC) keep Passes and . Adequate publications and accomplishments Deletion of Sarah Ansari WP:PROF||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4775 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Devil Hunter Yohko video games User:Jovanmilic97 00:14, 24 January 2020 (UTC) merge to Devil Hunter Yohko#Video games as an obvious per above. Doesn't serve the navigational purpose as there is only one game with Wiki article (also having questionable notability on it's own), and there aren't many sources that talk about the games to support the list. The section is quite sufficient to cover the subject Deletion of List of Devil Hunter Yohko video games WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +4776 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Jaikishan (2nd nomination) User:FreeRangeFrog 21:58, 22 February 2013 (UTC) delete Coatrack or not, this seems to be a , since as far as I can tell he's not notable for anything else, and he would fail since he's not an elected official (as far as I can see?). The bio seems to have been created specifically to regurgitate rumors and scandals. Whatever has happened since the last AFD seems to be more of the same Deletion of Deepak Jaikishan (2nd nomination) WP:BLP1E||WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +4777 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mushtaque Ahmad User:Mosesheron 15:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC) delete """Local madrasah teacher. His major claim to fame seems to be his attainment of a PhD as the """"first scholar to study at Qawmi Madrasa"""" which I honestly regard as a great achievement on the part of Bangladesh's Qawmi Madrasas. Sadly, however, subject fails and . Sorry""" Deletion of Mushtaque Ahmad WP:GNG||WP:NSCHOLAR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4778 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Vokes User:Pdcook 15:16, 28 November 2009 (UTC) delete Clearly fails . Although there is some local media coverage of him, I don't think he quite meets Deletion of Matt Vokes WP:ATHLETE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4779 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koulik Bhattacharjee User:PCock 11:42, 1 April 2017 (UTC) delete He does seem to be a talented kid who may accomplish enough to meet our notability guidelines in the future, but I don't see the significant independent coverage to meet at this time Deletion of Koulik Bhattacharjee WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4780 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V sinizter User:Darkspots 01:10, 22 May 2007 (UTC) delete Fails --no evidence of reliable, independent coverage Deletion of V sinizter WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4781 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Trenches NONE NONE comment Fans or not, as wickethewok says, the article quite clearly fails #Burden_of_evidence and Deletion of The Trenches WP:V||WP:RS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4782 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sentinel (Staffordshire) User:Sam 13:07, 9 January 2018 (UTC) keep Sourcing an article about a newspaper dating from 1854 is seldom a problem, and we are here well passed GNG based on a review of available sources. The other problems mentioned in the nomination are basically all . On a side note: Apart from 1 !vote, all other delete/merge opinions have been made by accounts created ''after'' this discussion was opened. Also, this is not the third discussion, the article has never been up at AFD before and should be moved from its current location at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sentinel (Staffordshire) (3rd nomination) to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sentinel (Staffordshire Deletion of The Sentinel (Staffordshire) WP:SURMOUNTABLE Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +4783 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bani 'Udayd User:Sam 11:59, 31 October 2018 (UTC) delete Poorly sourced, mass-generated one-liner stubs, fails . No prejudice against recreation of properly sourced articles Deletion of Bani 'Udayd WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4784 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James M. Nolan User:David 19:29, 24 July 2011 (UTC) delete A college with eight core faculty is not a major institution and does not pass #C6, and the article offers no other indication of notability Deletion of James M. Nolan WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4785 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boxxy User:Chasingsol 06:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC) delete The sole (dubious) |reliable source is a blog for the online version of a respected newspaper, the other mentions of this meme are from lesser known 'fan sites' and similar. Does not appear to meet . The subject of the article is a short-lived meme that has little relevance beyond those who frequent 4chan and has received no major news coverage Deletion of Boxxy WP:RS||WP:WEB Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4786 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Treacherous User:Ikh 16:14, 30 May 2007 (UTC) delete agree with nom. Not notable, unsourced, does not meet Deletion of Treacherous WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4787 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2000s in Young People's fashion User:Doc 18:29, 9 October 2009 (UTC) delete WEBHOST|violates |almost |every |rule |we |have Deletion of 2000s in Young People's fashion WP:NPOV||WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:V||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +4788 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FullMAC User:Batard0 11:22, 23 October 2012 (UTC) merge as above. I found a few books in which they're mentioned briefly http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ZtBnZoijaDcC&pg=PA28&lpg=PA28&dq=%22fullmac%22&source=bl&ots=cKW0Fow3ca&sig=CC7keXDSgcvEXhgxw6WBjLFg6Fc&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ynOGUOTpFqq20QX0-ICIBA&ved=0CC8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22fullmac%22&f=false here and http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=f5Vz08spzw8C&q=%22fullmac%22&dq=%22fullmac%22&source=bl&ots=b19H9azGRO&sig=lJdvwhuDn3dg9Y9jTwtO1rmnQ7Y&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ynOGUOTpFqq20QX0-ICIBA&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAQ here and http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=JCf9jCPSfa8C&pg=PA128&lpg=PA128&dq=%22fullmac%22&source=bl&ots=u-Q-esoAEn&sig=LA5QVW-FwKs8JdOAwRuFpDXlv4Y&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ynOGUOTpFqq20QX0-ICIBA&ved=0CDgQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=%22fullmac%22&f=false here, but this doesn't rise to the level of significant coverage under , I would argue. These limited sources are better placed in another article where they can be treated with a couple of sentences Deletion of FullMAC WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4789 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suicide of Nicola Raphael User:CactusWriter 23:02, 19 December 2010 (UTC) delete """Per and . Unlike the """"see other"""" articles about suicides listed on the page, I find no evidence of significant results in this case (i.e., legislation, etc.). Unfortunately, this is only another of the hundreds of teenage suicides which occur each year as listed http://www.bullyonline.org/schoolbully/cases.htm here""" Deletion of Suicide of Nicola Raphael WP:1E||WP:NOTMEMORIAL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4790 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ek Khiladi Ek Haseena (film) User:Accesscrawl 11:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC) keep Passes . Source mentioned in RS is reliable Deletion of Ek Khiladi Ek Haseena (film) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4791 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fish Hoek Library User:HelenOnline 11:38, 25 July 2014 (UTC) keep per subject to removal of off-topic |forking. Fish Hoek is a separate article Deletion of Fish Hoek Library WP:LOCAL||WP:CONTENTFORK Wikipedia:Places of local interest 41 +4792 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of 2015 MLB games on ESPN User:Bearcat 20:37, 8 January 2016 (UTC) delete It's a longstanding principle that |Wikipedia is not TV Guide; maintaining lists of every individual baseball game that aired on one particular television network definitely falls afoul of that Deletion of List of 2015 MLB games on ESPN WP:NOTTVGUIDE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4793 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10 cent trek User:Bigdaddy1981 17:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC) delete sounds made up - 10 pence trek - the term that purports to describe the practice's UK analogue - is certainly |utter bollocks Deletion of 10 cent trek WP:BOLLOCKS Wikipedia:Complete bollocks 62 +4794 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casey Cott User:Insertcleverphrasehere 02:38, 25 March 2016 (UTC) delete WP:Too soon and doesn't meet Deletion of Casey Cott WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4795 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asif Group of Companies User:HighKing 12:25, 16 August 2017 (UTC) delete I agree, fails and no secondary sources can be found Deletion of Asif Group of Companies WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4796 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. C. Unnithan User:S 16:26, 24 February 2020 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of R. C. Unnithan WP:NPOL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4797 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aum (unit) [[User talk:24.151.10.165|talk]]) 18:03, 8 January 2015 (UTC) keep Sarpler. An historical measure for wool. See, e.g., https://books.google.com/books?id=7S78AQAAQBAJ&pg=PA59&dq=Sarpler+wool&hl=en&sa=X&ei=WsSuVMGPEPTfsASVlIGIDA&ved=0CCgQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=Sarpler%20wool&f=false and https://books.google.com/books?id=TMEFFT-28CYC&pg=PA140&dq=Sarpler+wool&hl=en&sa=X&ei=WsSuVMGPEPTfsASVlIGIDA&ved=0CB0Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Sarpler%20wool&f=false. Recommend '''Keep all''' per with no prejudice to renominating individual articles for deletion. Special:Contributions/24.151.10.165|24.151.10.165 Deletion of Aum (unit) WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +4798 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icy Hot Stuntaz User:Isotope23 19:18, 29 March 2006 (UTC) keep and this is a good reason why meme criteria should be established as an offshoot of Deletion of Icy Hot Stuntaz WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4799 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Luxury Cars User:LonelyBeacon 01:13, 21 July 2008 (UTC) delete """this is another well intended list that is inherently . Even getting rid of the lead-in describing cars as """"desirable or expensive"""" as these are highly relative terms depending on where you are in the world. In that sense, it takes on a very First World POV. If the list were better tailored to something like: Cars with suggested retail values of over >>insert monetary value here""" Deletion of List of Luxury Cars WP:INDISCRIMINATE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4800 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puss (Swedish music duo) User:Walter 18:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC) delete WP:MUSICBIO states that they have won or been nominated for a '''major music award''', such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or '''Grammis''' award, but the the Grammis award for which they were nominated—club/dance—is not a major category. The nomination and their music has not garnered enough interest to make they notable yet. Hopefully a case of Deletion of Puss (Swedish music duo) :WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +4801 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Spider User:Auric 21:35, 4 January 2020 (UTC) keep Article could use more work, but seems balanced. has already been applied Deletion of Great Spider WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +4802 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shihab S. Asfour User:David 00:00, 8 July 2016 (UTC) delete This is essentially just a cv, and neither his Google scholar citation counts nor his administrative position are enough to convince me of a pass of Deletion of Shihab S. Asfour WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4803 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brenda Jean Patrick User:Pdcook 15:41, 3 February 2010 (UTC) comment Why do a few of the references in the article point to other Wikipedia pages? Wikipedia is not a |reliable source Deletion of Brenda Jean Patrick WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4804 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Navarini User:SheffieldSteel 21:35, 29 April 2008 (UTC) delete While he holds a position of some authority, the available sources are trivial mentions. Fails Deletion of George Navarini WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4805 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Echenique User:SportsOlympic 21:16, 14 July 2020 (UTC) keep Meets “A sportsperson is presumed to be notable if the person has actively participated in a major amateur or professional competition Deletion of José Echenique WP:SPORTSPERSON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4806 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delone Catholic High School User:Zivko85 07:10, 1 July 2007 (UTC) delete per , OT#IINFO. I am broadly in support of VanTucky's and OIC's comments here Deletion of Delone Catholic High School WP:N||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4807 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jet Pack Adventure User:James086 10:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC) delete WP:N|not notable, no |sources and #IINFO|Wikipedia is not a game guide Deletion of Jet Pack Adventure WP:RS||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4808 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List Of KISS Songs User:HisSpaceResearch 08:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC) delete per . Not necessary, and not wikified, issues, etc Deletion of List Of KISS Songs WP:IINFO||WP:MOS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4809 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francisca Susano User:Samsmachado 01:34, 4 December 2020 (UTC) delete """All coverage of Susano centres around her being 199+. IMHO this (not dying/being a supercentenarian) is """"one event"""" and so the article should be deleted per . I would suggest a redirect to Longevity myths, but Susano doesn't yet meet the 130+ requirement to be listed in Modern Extreme Longevity Claims""" Deletion of Francisca Susano WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +4810 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven Silver Fish User:Coredesat 02:32, 25 August 2006 (UTC) delete vanity for a |non-notable band Deletion of Seven Silver Fish WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4811 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirk Bezemer user:Hannes 20:52, 3 July 2019 (UTC) keep clearly relevant according to #C1 with 4 publications with > 100 citations. But I agree, the article needs some work Deletion of Dirk Bezemer WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4812 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa McGregor User:Jersey92 04:41, 22 July 2014 (UTC) delete I do not see how this subject passes Deletion of Lisa McGregor WP:NOTABILITY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4813 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Control-left User:Hazarasp 04:13, 2 September 2017 (UTC) delete I could not find any use of this term outside blogs or minor media sources; as such fails Deletion of Control-left WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4814 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lily Blake Capwell User:Bearcat 22:15, 19 February 2018 (UTC) delete To be considered notable, a television character needs to be |reliably sourceable to media coverage which suggests some real-world context for notability — it's ''not'' enough to just write an in-universe summary of her own story arc, if you can't demonstrate that she had any ''impact'' on ''real life''. But nothing here demonstrates any real-world notability, and none of the content is sourced to justify merging Deletion of Lily Blake Capwell WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4815 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeltaNeutralCalendarSpreading User:Tyrol5 00:40, 6 April 2011 (UTC) delete Hybrid of an editorial and spam (i.e. it doesn't belong here per Deletion of DeltaNeutralCalendarSpreading WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4816 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memory Alpha (4th nomination) User:Skomorokh 16:01, 5 December 2008 (UTC) keep http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Memory_Alpha&diff=255814227&oldid=255787640 This was not at all difficult, nor comprehensive. Wikipedia would without question be a poorer encyclopaedia with the removal of this article. This discussion shows a typical failure to consider an article's |potential, rather than current state Deletion of Memory Alpha (4th nomination) WP:POTENTIAL Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state 6 +4817 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avraham Solomon User:Yoninah 22:12, 15 September 2014 (UTC) delete per nom. No |secondary sources or significant coverage; does not satisfy or Deletion of Avraham Solomon WP:SECONDARY||WP:GNG||WP:BIO Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4818 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halfling (Dungeons & Dragons) User:Hog 02:49, 13 March 2020 (UTC) merge to Halfling. The topic of halflings as a whole is probably notable to some extent, and the D&D halflings would be part of that subject. However, the amount of detail in the entire article would be . A trimmed version should be merged, though Deletion of Halfling (Dungeons & Dragons) WP:UNDUE Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +4819 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Downtown Markham, Ontario User:Mindmatrix 22:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC) comment although I think this is a notable subject, there is little in the current article that is sufficiently convincing to keep it. Reliance on one source, the developer's website for the planned community, is inadequate per . I'm certain there should be a few reliable sources which discuss the nature of the planned community, and the reason for its existence, in reasonable depth. In fact, it has been the centre of discussion and debate regarding new techniques in urban planning, so it's just a matter of finding these sources. I'm willing to give interested editors time to find and incorporate them into the article in order to salvage it, but I'll refrain from rating this as a ''keep'' until I see evidence of this. As is stands, this article doesn't merit inclusion in Wikipedia Deletion of Downtown Markham, Ontario WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4820 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NewStar Financial User:Adamant1 20:02, 25 July 2020 (UTC) delete The company lacks the in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources need to pass . There was one source provided above, but it's a local outlet to the Boston area where this company is located. So, it doesn't count for notability on it's own. Merging might be an option, but the merge targets sourcing is also extremely suspect and I'm not a fan of merging one badly sourced article into another one Deletion of NewStar Financial WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4821 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zelda tetras curse User:MER 13:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC) delete as |unsourced and unverifiable |crystal ballery, |conflict of interest, failure of Deletion of Zelda tetras curse WP:V||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:COI||WP:SOFTWARE Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4822 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MetaMask User:Expertwikiguy 10:30, 7 December 2020 (UTC) keep Meets based on sources such as Newsweek, Mashable, NY Tines, ZDNet, etc. What else is needed to justify significant coverage? I know that Crypto is looked as spam by many Wiki admins, but it is time it gets to be an acceptable topic, specially when they have significant coverage Deletion of MetaMask WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4823 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Kamen Rider: Dragon Knight characters User:Rorshacma 16:50, 22 January 2021 (UTC) delete """While character lists ''can'' be valid spinouts of articles, they actually need to be comprised of sourced information and be able to pass and/or the . This list is only using a single source, which appears to not only be a dead link, but was just the program scheduling for a single episode. I've done some searches, and I am really not finding any coverage of the characters from the show in reliable sources that could support this spinout article. There is already basic coverage of the major characters in the """"Plot"""" section of the main Kamen Rider: Dragon Knight article, and there is really no content in this article that is actually salvageable for merging, as there is no sourced information""" Deletion of List of Kamen Rider: Dragon Knight characters WP:LISTN||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4824 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sewing Dragon User:Robertbcole 22:07, 29 November 2006 (UTC) delete Although the above user's argument has a certain appeal, the issue ends up coming down to |verifibility. In the Yeti case, we can verify that there is a notable myth. In this instance, I can find http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&q=%22sewing%20dragon%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wn little evidence to convince me that the Sewing Dragon is a myth subject to significant debate. The article's pictures also leave something to be desired Deletion of Sewing Dragon WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4825 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James William Middleton User:Patitomr 20:07, 4 May 2011 (UTC) merge to Middleton family as proposed above (is that really the best title though?). This is textbook |inheritance and |cruft. My bet is that in one year there will be as little if not less to write about him (and reasons to do so), and I would personally choose to get his and other relatives' data into a section at Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, but I don't think an article on her family is inappropriate, and it is a fair compromise between the participants of this AfD Deletion of James William Middleton WP:INHERIT||WP:CRUFT Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +4826 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of richest actors User:Northamerica1000 18:07, 10 January 2015 (UTC) keep Passes because the topic has been covered as a group/set by reliable sources. Source examples include: http://abcnews.go.com/Business/richest-actors-world-expect/story?id=23815462 ABC News, http://variety.com/2014/biz/news/jerry-seinfeld-shah-rukh-khan-top-actors-rich-list-1201187780/ Variety, http://magazine.foxnews.com/celebrity/and-worlds-10-richest-actors-possibly-are Fox News Magazine. Also passes and Deletion of List of richest actors WP:LISTN||WP:NLIST||WP:LSC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4827 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julius Lindgren User:GiantSnowman 12:54, 15 January 2018 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Julius Lindgren WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4828 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whompa User:MER 04:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC) delete as and/or failure to assert notability. So tagged Deletion of Whompa WP:VSCA Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +4829 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GameMill Entertainment [[User talk:Czar|czar]] 07:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC) delete This is a rather interesting case. Normally, I'd expect to keep a company article and use it to store reviews of its games if, say, one game is notable, but several are not. But in this case there is little about both the company and the games. Without prejudice to separate AfDs, none of its four games appear notable. All lack multiple, significant reviews. The Frozen and Cartoon Network games should be covered in their parent list/articles. Water Sports lacks coverage altogether. And that leaves Big Rigs, which has few reliable reviews and is known primarily for being the butt of jokes. With only reviews from GameSpot and G4, and little extra news commentary, I'd delete that one too (or perhaps try to redirect it to an article on games with exceptionally poor reception?) So that leaves the company itself, which has no independent coverage in reliable sources. (Here, have some press releases for shovelware:http://www.ign.com/articles/2009/12/15/gamemill-and-activision-announce-zhu-zhu-pets-for-nintendo-dshttp://www.ign.com/articles/2009/09/08/gamemill-announces-cruise-ship-vacation-games-for-wiihttp://www.ign.com/articles/2009/10/26/gamemill-announces-hidden-mysteries-titanic-for-wii-nintendo-ds-pc-and-mac. Nope, |no presumption of notability here Deletion of GameMill Entertainment WP:42 Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything 79 +4830 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nightmare on Elm Street Companion User:Mitaphane 03:40, 27 September 2006 (UTC) delete per . The website link is already covered on the ''Nightmare...'' article Deletion of Nightmare on Elm Street Companion WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4831 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Enterprise Coaches User:SkierRMH 08:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC) delete per nom. fails Deletion of New Enterprise Coaches WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4832 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owen Honors User:Nick 07:59, 5 January 2011 (UTC) delete fails , and . The incident which led to his sacking could, and should, be covered in the article on the ship. A lot of the above keep votes appear to be variants of and (in that the commander of a large warship is deemed notable in isolation of any assessment of available sources) and aren't based on any policy Deletion of Owen Honors WP:BIO||WP:MILPEOPLE||WP:ONEEVENT||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:ILIKEIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4833 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Bryant (Motivational Speaker) User:Bearian 21:11, 18 November 2016 (UTC) delete per and . This guy appears to be |just another cheerleading speaker. Yes, he spoke in Singapore, a tiny nation that I spent five days in and saw almost all there is to see (I loved the popiah, for what it's worth). I remind the gentle reader that we are a private American charity, |not a free web host for jet-setting business people out to make a profit Deletion of Andrew Bryant (Motivational Speaker) WP:OUTCOMES||WP:GNG||WP:MILL||WP:NOTWEBHOST Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +4834 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nirnnayakam User:Hut 21:28, 2 June 2015 (UTC) comment the nominator has been indefinitely blocked as a block-evading sockpuppet and the article they created about this film has been deleted under #G5. I don't see any point in deleting this now as it's no longer a duplicate article, although we could still move it if desired Deletion of Nirnnayakam WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +4835 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabrielle Bennett User:RightCowLeftCoast 04:07, 30 April 2013 (UTC) delete subject has received passing mention in multiple non-primary reliable sources, however none of these sources give |in-depth |significant coverage to the subject of this AfD; therefore the subject appears to fail & , let a lone Deletion of Gabrielle Bennett WP:INDEPTH||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:ENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4836 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hidden Curriculum User:Ad 16:16, 23 October 2016 (UTC) delete per . It's an unencyclopedic combination of WP:NOTESSAY and WP:PLOT, full of what smells like WP:OR. Its referencing is simply unacceptable. I have added multiple CN tags. While I concede the subject may be notable, this article is a disaster on wheels. Blow it up and start over Deletion of The Hidden Curriculum WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +4837 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernadette Ní Ghallchóir User:FOARP 08:57, 30 October 2019 (UTC) keep """per , at least two instances of in more than one reliable source are needed. The first is https://www.independent.ie/entertainment/the-diary-red-rocks-new-writer-brendan-courtneys-new-web-show-bts-weddings-and-the-leinster-stars-new-pub-30544847.html this Irish Independent article which gives her three short paras and highlights the reasons for her notability (introduced the Irish language to many people in Ireland, hosted Eurovision) - nb. this is not a case of """"inherited"""" notability because that would be editors saying, without supporting sources, that she was notable for hosting Eurovision, rather than having a reliable source state that this is the case. From that article, I see she now goes under the name Bernadette Ó hUiginn, and searching for that name I see she is also covered in this https://www.irishtimes.com/news/irish-on-parade-and-on-show-1.162848 Irish Times article. http://www.nival.ie/collections/artists-database/view/artist/name/ni-galchoir-bernadette/ I also see from the Nival database that she has had a number of exhibitions for her artwork including at Dún Aimhirgin which is a https://www.independent.ie/regionals/braypeople/news/artists-to-present-show-at-dept-of-arts-and-culture-27601174.html """"prestigious state-run gallery"""" in Ireland. Additionally there's https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=-HgkAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA11636&dq=Bernadette+hUiginn&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi-4IuC0MPlAhXGEcAKHZgYB3UQ6AEIPzAD#v=onepage&q=Bernadette%20hUiginn&f=false this coverage in the US Congressional records (EDIT: this appears to have been a story published in the Washington Post which https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1999/02/11/the-art-of-understanding/6dd336e5-06d8-4732-bf85-b4fde60e9cf8/ can be read here). As with a lot of Irish gaelic names, searching in this case is complicated by the large number of variants of each name so there's probably more out there, but even with what's been found thus far seems like a pass for and also (particularly 4(b""" Deletion of Bernadette Ní Ghallchóir WP:BASIC||WP:SIGCOV||WP:BASIC||WP:NARTIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4838 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florian Roșu User:Rugbyfan22 19:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC) delete Fails and . Was named in the most recent international squad but the match was cancelled due to COVID. With no scheduled games in the near future that would allow him to pass it seems a clear case of . Could potentially be draftifyed until notable but has been in main space for just under a year Deletion of Florian Roșu WP:NRU||WP:GNG||WP:NRU||WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4839 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homes for the Homeless User:Wm335td 20:39, 17 November 2019 (UTC) delete sadly... as the nominator has stated we cannot turn up any Deletion of Homes for the Homeless WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4840 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik J. Berg User:MichaelQSchmidt 07:35, 20 May 2009 (UTC) keep """In looking toward : Alonso Duralde of ''MSNBC'': """"I was particularly taken with Berg, who has almost no dialogue, but who expresses volumes through his eyes and facial expressions; he could have been huge in silent cinema, but hopefully there’s a place for him in talkies as well. (It’s Berg, incidentally, who you see on the posters with the weird driftwood-like blob thing coming out of his mouth.)""""http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29916733 seems a bit more-than-trivial and would tend to nudge the bar of the a bit more""" Deletion of Erik J. Berg WP:GNG||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4841 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SEEDS User:K 23:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC) delete does not meet and significant RS coverage not found. The sources offered above are very minor passing mentions Deletion of SEEDS WP:NORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4842 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark and Shattered Lands User:PresN 14:32, 4 August 2006 (UTC) delete Non-notable, fails . 125 users at a time isn't big enough to be notable Deletion of Dark and Shattered Lands WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4843 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blogburst User:Uncle 20:36, 2 December 2006 (UTC) delete unless a |reliable (non-blog Deletion of Blogburst WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4844 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Tornambe User:Czj 06:44, 22 January 2007 (UTC) delete NN individual. Doesn't pass Deletion of Michael Tornambe WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4845 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain - Seventh Edition User:Wizard191 13:54, 28 December 2009 (UTC) keep Thanks for posting this over on the Engineering Wikiproject. This book is definitely notable per #Criteria point 4. However, I'm at a loss for finding any online references to support this at the moment. I can tell you that I learned about it in college and that it is held in high regards among mechanical engineers and professors Deletion of Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain - Seventh Edition WP:NB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4846 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuttiyani St George Orthodox Church, Ranny User:Whiteguru 12:58, 11 July 2011 (UTC) delete article lacks substance and fails Deletion of Kuttiyani St George Orthodox Church, Ranny WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4847 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mizuko Ito User:Edison 17:34, 2 May 2007 (UTC) delete """Unless references can be found and added to the article by the end of the deletion debate to show that she satisfies }}. Being a """"Senior Fellow"""" (sounds like a postdoc), and being a """"Visiting Associate Prof"""" certainly do not satisfy . Her USC webpage says """"numerous publications"""" but that claim alone is not satisfactory to show she meeets the notability criteria. An editor's assertion here of her notability is not enough. It is required by to show that others in her field have so recognized her""" Deletion of Mizuko Ito WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4848 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of minor Star Wars Jedi knights User:Ridernyc 21:19, 6 November 2007 (UTC) delete per lot and . No real world context at all. There is already a Star Wars Wiki for this type of content Deletion of List of minor Star Wars Jedi knights WP:P||WP:WAF Wikipedia:Portal 50 +4849 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Sharmila Banu User:Jersey92 17:49, 20 July 2014 (UTC) delete Easily fails . Also fails and . Delete Deletion of Death of Sharmila Banu WP:NOTABILITY||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4850 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argh! User:ZeroOne 23:30, 24 February 2006 (UTC) keep """This article is quite good. It's got enough content and an explained code example. May I also remind you that """"non-notability"""" is not a deletion criteria (""" Deletion of Argh! WP:DEL Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +4851 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/0 A.D. (game) User:Marasmusine 13:14, 3 September 2009 (UTC) merge """the only -qualifying coverage (and only independent source) presented is the GameDev interview linked to under ELs. As always, I prefer multiple sources. If this is the only such coverage, then the game can perhaps be mentioned in our """"List Of"""" articles instead, with no predjudice against restoring the article if more coverage is achieved at a later date""" Deletion of 0 A.D. (game) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4852 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grexy User:MichaelQSchmidt 18:48, 4 October 2008 (UTC) delete as . I can sure Grok that Deletion of Grexy WP:MADEUP Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +4853 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bilel Henider User:Bettia 13:26, 1 September 2009 (UTC) delete Fails as he has yet to play at a Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues|fully professional level, and a quick Google search only brings up http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=uk&hl=en&q=Bilel+Henider two match reports and a http://www.google.com/search?client=opera&rls=en&q=Bilel+Henider&sourceid=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8 shedload of Wiki mirrors and profile pages, which aren't enough to satisfy |general notability guidelines Deletion of Bilel Henider WP:ATHLETE||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4854 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LacyJane Folger User:Ejgreen77 14:17, 14 February 2015 (UTC) keep as a pass per the research work done by Dravecky Deletion of LacyJane Folger WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4855 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional law firms [[User talk:137.122.49.102|talk]]) 14:57, 20 September 2010 (UTC) delete unencyclopedic cross-categorization, loosely associated topics, .--Special:Contributions/137.122.49.102|137.122.49.102 Deletion of List of fictional law firms WP:NOTDIR Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4856 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stress Field Detector User:Margin1522 12:27, 28 November 2014 (UTC) delete """I found a couple of the dead links, but they were about commercial applications. No information about how it works except that it is a """"unique quantum method"""". The article itself says there is no published info. It's probably proprietary. Might find more if someone checked for patents, but that would be . – """ Deletion of Stress Field Detector WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4857 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vernon Stewart Laurie User:The 19:16, 15 April 2013 (UTC) keep Between the various actions and honors this person did and achieved, there's more than enough here to estaiblish notability. |Being short is not a reason to delete Deletion of Vernon Stewart Laurie WP:TOOLITTLE Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +4858 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exit Day of the Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union User:Eeveeman 19:17, 27 December 2019 (UTC) delete Don't think any of the information in the article is unique, it's all contained in other articles such as Brexit where the section specifically on Brexit#Exit day|Exit Day is artificially small as to presumably justify the external article. Merge back to there. As currently (perhaps applies) a bell-ringing and presumed busy news day isn't notable enough for its own article Deletion of Exit Day of the Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +4859 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magical Circus User:K 02:13, 27 June 2018 (UTC) delete Does not meet ; significant RS coverage not found. I don't see any content / sources worth merging, and the tour appears to be too insignificant for the name to have become a plausible search term Deletion of Magical Circus WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4860 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarosh Khan User:K 07:27, 2 September 2017 (UTC) delete does not meet and significant RS coverage not found. Produced one notable movies, but producers are rarely notable and this subject misses the mark Deletion of Sarosh Khan WP:CREATIVE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4861 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd Friel User:Springnuts 22:33, 15 December 2008 (UTC) delete """Extraordinary. I am certain I have heard of him, yet I am in a different continent and we do not move in the same circles. So I find the lack of reliable, independent and substantial sources very odd, but compelling from a Wiki-notability point of view. Comes closest, maybe, to being a |creative professional ... or to being an |entertainer - he may have a """"large fan base or a significant 'cult' following"""" ... but I come back to the lack of reliable, substantial, independent sources. My heart wants to |make an exception here but my wiki-head says he is better deleted for now and re-created when he is (in the Wiki sense) notable""" Deletion of Todd Friel WP:CREATIVE||WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:IAR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4862 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-subscribed YouTube channels User:Paintspot 20:25, 11 February 2019 (UTC) keep per above. Satisfies ). Has enough secondary source coverage. Also, a big mass deletion of all these YouTube articles doesn't seem to be the best idea Deletion of List of most-subscribed YouTube channels WP:LISTN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4863 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huma Abedin (2nd nomination) User:Silver 22:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC) comment I have tagged this article for |rescue Deletion of Huma Abedin (2nd nomination) WP:ARS Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron 46 +4864 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice of Ibelin User:Bearian 19:33, 23 July 2021 (UTC) merge to John of Lusignan. They were real people, but the subject was a |noblewoman by marriage; she was not actually queen of anything, and her father was a courtier Deletion of Alice of Ibelin WP:MILL Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill 32 +4865 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenwich Printmakers User:ThePointblank 07:36, 3 November 2008 (UTC) delete as per . Non-notable, is not covered by reliable secondary sources Deletion of Greenwich Printmakers WP:COMPANY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4866 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bong cooler User:DMacks 20:26, 22 November 2009 (UTC) merge to Evaporative cooler#Evaporative cooler designs if can be found about it. OTOH, this seems like a niche-application device, so maybe better to put it in Computer cooling .A lack of sources is a good reason to delete because is a core policy, as well as being evidence for the guideline. It indeed does look interesting, but that's not the criterion for inclusion. Someone quick get us ''some'' sources so we can decide if it's got enough to merit inclusion in those articles or if I should change my !vote to delete as a piece of FT lore Deletion of Bong cooler WP:RS||WP:V||WP:N||WP:V||WP:NFT Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4867 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waqar Ali Khan User:FreeRangeFrog 18:59, 16 January 2013 (UTC) delete Seems to fail and a redirect is impossible since the show's article does not exist. I am seeing a lot of social media cruft but no substantive coverage, although as usual this might be a language issue Deletion of Waqar Ali Khan WP:ENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4868 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Fredinburg User:Inter 22:26, 30 April 2015 (UTC) delete Subject is only known because he dated a famous person (which many other do) and died in a deadly earthquake (which killed thousands of other people). There are plenty of people who work for Google and its projects. In no way does any of this make this article pass . Keep advocates seem to be using a bit too much , but ''if'' there is more significant media coverage (which I don't think, but if) than the article should be kept. Till then delete Deletion of Dan Fredinburg WP:NN||WP:ARTN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4869 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Kingdom general election debates, 2009-2010 User:DustFormsWords 04:40, 29 September 2009 (UTC) delete per . It's very difficult for a future event that may or may not take place to be notable; this article is premature and can be recreated (at the earliest) when the possibility of their future existence has some real and notable effect on the socio-political landscape Deletion of United Kingdom general election debates, 2009-2010 WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4870 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Media Journal User:Headbomb 15:30, 18 May 2018 (UTC) delete AFAICT, utter fail of . {{MIAR|1550-7521}} says its indexed in a few places, but I'm not sure any of those are selective. {{ping|DGG}} would know Deletion of Global Media Journal WP:NJOURNALS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4871 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Valley Shockwave User:Bagumba 16:36, 5 November 2011 (UTC) delete Fails and doesnt meet Deletion of Big Valley Shockwave WP:ORG||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4872 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Jennifer Lopez Greatest Hits (2009) User:Pharmboy 00:21, 30 October 2008 (UTC) delete with a |crystal hammer Deletion of Untitled Jennifer Lopez Greatest Hits (2009) WP:HAMMER Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law 11 +4873 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clearview Horizon User:Spinningspark 16:23, 31 May 2019 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Clearview Horizon WP:NORG||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4874 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solano NewsNet User:Novem 07:03, 15 July 2021 (UTC) delete As stated in my prod, {{tq|Doesn't appear to pass or . Not seeing GNG passing sources in my search Deletion of Solano NewsNet WP:GNG||WP:NCORP||WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4875 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Underground trivia (4th nomination) User:Gavin 09:49, 18 September 2007 (UTC) delete as the rump of an article is comprised of otability|non-notable |original research Deletion of London Underground trivia (4th nomination) WP:N||WP:OR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4876 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs about killers (2nd nomination) User:MrFizyx 21:21, 2 August 2007 (UTC) merge """relevant content to murder ballad. Since murder ballads are basically songs about killers and/or their victims. And this list has some details and worthy examples not present there. Both the list and the article are short enough that this could be done if editors feel that the stand-alone list is a violation of #DIR or whatever else. Frankly I find the policy arguments on both sides of this debate to be fairly week. I added the """"further reading"""" section during the last debate in hopes that someone might put a little more meat in there. It appears that kept the mob at bay for about two weeks. Very discouraging""" Deletion of List of songs about killers (2nd nomination) WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4877 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Sathya Sai Super Speciality Hospital User:Winged 04:46, 13 October 2019 (UTC) delete Unadulterated spam, per my original tagging; part of the Sai-Baba-walled-garden, that was subject to 2 Arbitration cases, in the wild west days of Wikipedia. FWIW, I spot no '''|minimally significant''' coverage of the subject in |reliable sources except in {{Cite book|url=https://chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.7208/chicago/9780226396248.001.0001/upso-9780226396071|title=The Distressed Body: Rethinking Illness, Imprisonment, and Healing|last=Leder|first=Drew|publisher=University of Chicago Press|year=2016|isbn=9780226396071|pages=78,79|doi=10.7208/chicago/9780226396248.003.0006|chapter-url-access=subscription|chapter=Rethinking Clinical Practice: Toward a More Materialistic Medicine|chapter-url=https://chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.7208/chicago/9780226396248.001.0001/upso-9780226396071-chapter-006}}; the subject thus fails Deletion of Sri Sathya Sai Super Speciality Hospital WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:GEOFEAT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4878 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klaus Solberg Søilen User:Joseph2302 21:11, 18 June 2015 (UTC) delete As per FreeRangeFrog, doesn't quite pass or Deletion of Klaus Solberg Søilen WP:PROF||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4879 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judaism and bus stops User:Jbtscott 14:08, 6 October 2010 (UTC) delete total |synthesis Deletion of Judaism and bus stops WP:SYNTH Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4880 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sreelakshmi Suresh (4th nomination) User:Northamerica1000 23:40, 29 August 2012 (UTC) keep spaced ndash}} Passes . Examples include: http://www.hindu.com/yw/2009/02/24/stories/2009022450280400.htm, http://www.hindu.com/2006/12/29/stories/2006122914400300.htm, http://www.arabnews.com/node/293715, http://www.gulf-times.com/site/topics/article.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=128557&version=1&template_id=40&parent_id=22 Deletion of Sreelakshmi Suresh (4th nomination) WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4881 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeWitt Clinton High School User:Quarl NONE keep per . No need to nominate high schools, especially ones of this size. &mdash Deletion of DeWitt Clinton High School WP:SCH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4882 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intellectual Darwinism User:Rushyo 13:40, 4 December 2011 (UTC) delete per . The sources are not reliable or have tangental relevance and whilst one or two of the references are okay they're not actually being cited and seem to have been put there just as a weak attempt at preventing deletion. A little bit of as well - the Software Architecture analogy is just... weird Deletion of Intellectual Darwinism WP:NEO||WP:OR Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +4883 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/88-Keys User:Rackabello 21:35, 10 August 2007 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of 88-Keys WP:V||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4884 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anuja Trehan Kapur User:Harshil169 03:56, 31 July 2019 (UTC) delete Non notable fails . Most of the sources fails Deletion of Anuja Trehan Kapur WP:GNG||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4885 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mandat User:Epinoia 02:10, 18 September 2019 (UTC) delete of the references in the article, none are about the film itself; kinopoisk.ru is just a listing - does not meet , no reviews by at least two nationally known critics, no awards, no significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources Deletion of Mandat WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4886 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of archive repair programs User:Ajf773 18:41, 17 May 2018 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Comparison of archive repair programs WP:NOTDIR Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4887 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/US-Bangla Group User:Worldbruce 19:45, 5 December 2017 (UTC) merge to US-Bangla Airlines. In theory the airline is the tail, and the group is the dog, but in practice the group (and its other companies) receives no significant, independent coverage in reliable sources, only passing mentions in articles about the airline. The group does not satisfy Deletion of US-Bangla Group WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4888 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Official Album Summer Olympics Games Rio 2016 User:McGeddon 17:06, 27 June 2016 (UTC) delete """as at best. I get precisely three Google results for ''""""Si Te Vas"""" """"Time Works Wonders"""" """"Olympics""""'', none confirming the existence of an Olympic album opening with those two tracks""" Deletion of Official Album Summer Olympics Games Rio 2016 WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +4889 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OMICS Group Inc User:January 17:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC) comment the creator of this article is a likely sock of Scholarscentral, who has a long history of copyright violations and is the subject of a ontributor copyright investigations/Scholarscentral|CCI. If any content is retained from this article it should be checked for copyright violations Deletion of OMICS Group Inc WP:C Wikipedia:Copyrights 60 +4890 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midori Hayase User:Collectonian 15:08, 15 February 2010 (UTC) delete unnotable voice actress who fails and ; no significant coverage in any reliable, third-party sources, unable to craft any viable compliant article, must be deleted Deletion of Midori Hayase WP:BIO||WP:N||WP:BLP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4891 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BMB Group User:Top 13:36, 9 November 2010 (UTC) keep per DGG above. I've cleaned up some of the worst of the already, but it needs more: I'll have a bash at that today. It will need occasional checking and de-spamification if it's kept, as there's an evident by its creator Deletion of BMB Group WP:PROMO||WP:COI Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4892 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaos Theory of Literature User:Coredesat 03:03, 5 July 2006 (UTC) delete per |Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought Deletion of Chaos Theory of Literature WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4893 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Click referral cycle User:Ihcoyc 14:39, 31 October 2011 (UTC) delete Has to do with |advertising on the Internet: ''Life cycle of any click can be referred as Click referral cycle, Click referral cycle is mainly used in click measurement and filtration of invalid clicks in internet advertising Deletion of Click referral cycle WP:B2B Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4894 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of video game companies [[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 19:57, 1 May 2009 (UTC) delete WP:PERNOM|per nom. This is not a history article, it's a half-fast spinout of the list articles as mentioned above. History articles need stuff like prose and |summary style; this page has neither Deletion of History of video game companies WP:SUMMARY Wikipedia:Summary style 23 +4895 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HomeTips.com User:Themfromspace 05:58, 23 April 2010 (UTC) comment none of the references added discuss the site in significant detail. They are either passing mentions of the site, or not |reliable sources Deletion of HomeTips.com WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4896 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flo Jalin (second nomination) User:EyeSerene 18:38, 21 September 2007 (UTC) comment Most of the copyvio stuff has now been rewritten, and the article ''is'' looking better. Even so, I still don't think Flo meets Deletion of Flo Jalin (second nomination) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4897 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evangelical Renewal Therapy User:Timneu22 13:49, 17 May 2010 (UTC) delete This article is written about a topic and/or is research by Patrick Saucer. Patrick Saucer also wrote the article. Clearly this is . Also, this article reads like an essay, is clearly , and comes to conclusions (repentance is achieved through...). This is not an encyclopedic article now, and written by the author himself, is unlikely to become one. I do not even know if the title of the article is valid in the mainstream study, or if it was coined by the author. Essays like this Wikipedia talk:CSD|should fall under some CSD; I wish they would. &mdash Deletion of Evangelical Renewal Therapy WP:COI||WP:POV Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +4898 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheats for WarCraft 3: Reign of Chaos and Frozen Throne User:Flygon 14:03, 15 June 2012 (UTC) delete as per Deletion of Cheats for WarCraft 3: Reign of Chaos and Frozen Throne WP:CHEATS Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +4899 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the occult secret societies User:MichaelQSchmidt 07:11, 9 February 2010 (UTC) keep """per nice cleanup and continue further expansion and sourcing that have allowed this list of notable """"secret societies"""" to meet . This a list that should be encouraged for further ment and expansion per sources. Considering deletion in the face of does not allow it to meet its , and diminishes Wikipedia. Comparisons with non-existent lists is interesting, for if those topics had the wide coverage in sources as do these """"secret societies"""", they too might meet inclusion criteria. No matter the topic, it is the coverage of such in numerous reliable sources... books, academia, press... that allow them to meet . That digression aside, I note that this particular discussion is about a specific list that DOES have sources that meet the and so merit expansion to further improve Wikipedia""" Deletion of List of the occult secret societies WP:LIST||WP:IMPROVE||WP:ATD||WP:POTENTIAL||WP:N||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Lists 36 +4900 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birkensnake User:HeartSWild 07:40, 24 August 2010 (UTC) comment I've never posted my opinion on here, but what the heck. The whole crux of this debate comes down to the sources of this entry being blogs, thus making them unreliable sources, thus making this entry not notable. This not correct. According to , blogs ''can be'' considered reliable sources if they meet certain wickets. ''NOTE: I don't see any blogs currently being used as sources for this entry''. But since it seems to be such an issue of contention if you would like to use a blog as a source, it would be best to put the link on the talk page and discuss why it would or why it wouldn't be a reliable source. Some blogs are, some blogs aren't. I hope that helps Deletion of Birkensnake WP:IRS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4901 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cross of the UnderTaker User:IslaySolomon 09:31, 15 October 2006 (UTC) delete symbol of wrestling character, utterly undeserving of its own article. #Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Pointless fancruft Deletion of Cross of the UnderTaker WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4902 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giga-Tube NONE 13:09, 24 September 2011 (UTC) delete Lacks to satisfy . Happy Editing! — '''{{User|70.21.12.213 Deletion of Giga-Tube WP:RS||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4903 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apps4Brands User:Ihcoyc 14:57, 21 April 2010 (UTC) delete WP:CSD#G11|unambiguous advertising and |patent nonsense: ''Engaging their customers, prospects, employees and other influencers on social networks, attaining attention of influencers through Earned Media, automating the process to lower the cost of investment in new employees and custom solutions and maintaining consistent branding and voice on multiple earned media platforms Deletion of Apps4Brands WP:NONSENSE Wikipedia:Patent nonsense 77 +4904 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HoverRace User:Marasmusine 19:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC) delete Not a single reliable, independent reference, per . To elaborate: forums and wikis are not eliable sources Deletion of HoverRace WP:V||WP:R Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4905 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandee Westgate User:Panser 11:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC) delete per nom. Also fails Deletion of Sandee Westgate WP:PORNBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4906 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norullah Noori NONE NONE keep """As I pointed out in the original {{tl|afd}} says individuals who have held senior government posts -- like Governor -- are considered notable. I offered links to substantiate that Noorullah Noori had been the Taliban's Governor of Balkh province. Noori was listed Wikisource:Denied_Persons_Pursuant_to_UN_Security_Council_Resolution#A._The_list_of_individuals_belonging_to_or_associated_with_the_Taliban|as number 90 on the United Nations' 1267 list of sanctioned individuals. The list transliterates his name as """"Nurullah Nuri"""", and asserts that not only was he Governor of Balkh, but he was also the administrator of the Northern Region. If I understood the closing administrator's post-facto justification for this deletion he or she could not accept considering the United Nations a reliable source for the positions of government officials like Noori""" Deletion of Norullah Noori WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4907 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Hunt User:Wisdom89 21:38, 25 March 2008 (UTC) delete If an actor doesn't even appear on imbd (not that this is the best meter stick), there is some questionable notability a foot. I can't find any reliable sources detailing anything, so, as it stands, this is a failure to meet Deletion of Daniel Hunt WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4908 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Duntsch user:Andrew 14:48, 17 February 2017 (UTC) keep The subject is covered in multiple books over several years including ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=EJf1DAAAQBAJ&pg=PT116 The Remarkable Case of Dr Christopher Duntsch'' and ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=EJf1DAAAQBAJ&pg=PT116 The Truth About Big Medicine''. There are multiple events here and ample coverage per Deletion of Christopher Duntsch WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4909 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Official Association of Professional Table Tennis Athletes of North America (2nd nomination) User:Cewbot 00:02, 16 January 2021 (UTC) comment While this discussion appears to have |no quorum, it is '''NOT eligible for |soft deletion''' because it was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Official Association of Professional Table Tennis Athletes of North America|previously discussed at AfD and the result was no consensus Deletion of Official Association of Professional Table Tennis Athletes of North America (2nd nomination) WP:NOQUORUM||WP:SOFTDELETE Wikipedia:Deletion process 72 +4910 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Zupicich User:AuthorAuthor 08:00, 30 August 2018 (UTC) keep Per and asic, well worded by Deletion of Joseph Zupicich WP:BIO||WP:B Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4911 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobovivo User:Kavadi 08:38, 4 November 2006 (UTC) delete Reads like an advertisement. YouTube this isn't. Above press mentions are of the company talking about itself, hence still does not satisfy Deletion of Mobovivo WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4912 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Los Angeles Dodgers Opening Day Starting Lineups User:Jaranda 23:02, 9 August 2007 (UTC) delete please read and , the notabilty case is moot here as we are talking about a list here, not the players of the list, with that reasoning, every list on pointless subjects gets articles, because they have related to notable people Deletion of List of Los Angeles Dodgers Opening Day Starting Lineups WP:LISTCRUFT||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Listcruft 66 +4913 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human flu User:Bearian 22:43, 22 October 2007 (UTC) keep as a good article - notable per Ghits, fixed per , and well-sourced Deletion of Human flu WP:HEY Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard 85 +4914 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felix Peng User:Quarl NONE delete as |non-notable biography Deletion of Felix Peng WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4915 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Empires (band) [[User Talk:JeremyMcClean|Talk]]) 01:45, 24 September 2010 (UTC) delete """Do I need to explain? The references here are a joke. There are five """"references,"""" three of them are interviews, another is a press article, and the last is a profile on some sort of forum. Obvious that this should be deleted. Might be a speedy on riteria for speedy deletion#A7|CSD A7 for a band. This should be closed due to . JeremyMcClean""" Deletion of Empires (band) WP:C||WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Copyrights 60 +4916 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Temples of Taichung User:Prisencolin 01:46, 12 March 2021 (UTC) keep WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP, needs to some especially with sourcing but this a very valid topic about rich architectural and cultural history. Passed as many of the entries has their own article, as can be more clearly seen in :Category:Temples in Taichung Deletion of Temples of Taichung WP:NLIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4917 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Your Woman Sleep With Others User:doomsdayer520 16:42, 8 June 2020 (UTC) keep """Note that the process requires some tolerance of other languages. There is plenty of evidence in sources that are reliable, both in Taiwan and internationally, that this band has gained notice in their country, at a level that satisfies the """"coverage"""" requirements at """ Deletion of Your Woman Sleep With Others WP:BEFORE||WP:NBAND Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +4918 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tellows User:JamesBaldwinWiki 09:17, 7 September 2018 (UTC) keep The article has notable and significant sources. I've erased some sources that are too unreliable such as blogs, press releases, or untrustworthy sites and added more reliable sources such as BBC spain, Bild, Genbeta. The sources are now trusted websites which meet the criteria of . As mentioned in the product review section in some sources are mainly product reviews which are allowed, as the reviews are objective with comparison of the product/application with other brands Deletion of Tellows WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:ORGIND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4919 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cariphalte (3rd nomination) User:Usernameunique 20:32, 22 February 2021 (UTC) comment """A cursory Google search establishes that lots of sources exist, and make it clear that this is a well-known product in the industry. These include at least two peer-reviewed studies (5 and 6 in the links that follow), contrary to one of the professed reasons for nominating this article (""""the sourcing doesn't establish how well it performs or anything close to in depth""""). Examples of sources: https://www.highwaysmagazine.co.uk/Shell-Cariphalte-50-years-and-counting/4092 1; https://hub-4.com/news/the-bugatti-circuit-of-le-mans-starts-afresh-thanks-to-shell-cariphalte-racetrack 2; http://www.haythink.com/news/detail.asp?ID=10158 3; https://web.archive.org/web/20200811135706/https://www.worldhighways.com/wh6/products/researchers-trial-3d-printing-both-concrete-and-asphalt-roads 4; https://clicsearch.csp.edu/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=cdi_proquest_journals_1563382657&context=PC&vid=01CLIC_CONCORDIA:CSP&lang=en&search_scope=CSP_all_P_and_E&adaptor=Primo%20Central&tab=CSP_Library_physical_and_online&query=sub,exact,%20ROAD%20PROJECTS%20,AND&mode=advanced 5; https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/SHELL-CARIPHALTE-M-THE-A14-A-CASE-HISTORY-Preston/a970f354e3275d464712ab5d0f1e66554280377d 6; https://highways.today/2017/01/18/shells-innovations-bitumen-research-development/ 7; http://revistavial.com/shell-bitumen-lanza-al-mercado-shell-cariphalte-am3-fresh/ 8. Other sources were also raised in this article's previous nominations; they simply have not been incorporated into the article. {{u|Johnpacklambert}} and {{u|TenPoundHammer}} appear to be basing notability off of the state of the article, but that is otability#Article content does not determine notability|not how notability works. Incidentally, the nominator's claim that there were """"Two No Consensus AfDs"""" is just flat-out false: The first was closed as a keep""" Deletion of Cariphalte (3rd nomination) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4920 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Save Sunset Cliffs User:Joe 02:19, 13 May 2010 (UTC) delete I can't find significant coverage for this |organization Deletion of Save Sunset Cliffs WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4921 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark oddo User:Sethacus 20:40, 22 October 2007 (UTC) delete """per . Doesn't appear notable, even with his life of """"fanthorpey"""" (philanthropy""" Deletion of Mark oddo WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4922 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of breweries in Connecticut User:Spinningspark 08:41, 21 January 2014 (UTC) keep per and Deletion of List of breweries in Connecticut WP:CSC Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists 51 +4923 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muar Municipal Council FC User:Yk 03:08, 9 June 2011 (UTC) keep Passes per having played in a national cup Deletion of Muar Municipal Council FC WP:FOOTYN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4924 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divisible polynomial User:David 18:52, 29 September 2014 (UTC) delete per . Apparently from the discussion here (I couldn't figure this out from the article itself) the topic is polynomials whose values for integer arguments are always composite numbers. There is likely something encyclopedic to say about them (they're mentioned for instance in {{jstor|2301357}}; relatedly see Sierpinski number and Schinzel's hypothesis H) but the article as written is so incomprehensible as to be not worth saving by any kind of merge or rename Deletion of Divisible polynomial WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +4925 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wizard staffing User:Wenli 01:17, 23 October 2007 (UTC) delete Definitely —  Deletion of Wizard staffing WP:MADEUP Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +4926 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controversies of the Polish-Soviet War User:Martintg 09:36, 5 August 2007 (UTC) keep per Sander. Seems this AfD is a case of Deletion of Controversies of the Polish-Soviet War WP:IDONTLIKEIT Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +4927 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conservative Underground (2nd nomination) User:Jersey 00:06, 19 April 2006 (UTC) delete alexa rank isn't that bad but it isn't comparable to some of the top political forums that have established non-Afdable articles here. The forum also fails (unless one of the three notability critera per web can be met then I'll stick with delete vote but it notability can be established I'll change my vote Deletion of Conservative Underground (2nd nomination) WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4928 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let's Go Sailing (band) User:Shell_Kinney 03:12, 22 October 2008 (UTC) keep Needs better sourcing, but both the Grey's Anatomy mention and the backup on a national tour mentions seem to indicate they pass Deletion of Let's Go Sailing (band) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4929 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association for Research on Ethnicity and Nationalism in the Americas User:RayAYang 19:48, 3 August 2008 (UTC) delete None of the preceding discussion helps to meet the primary criterion for , which is significant coverage by secondary sources. I do not feel that an academic association for a small subfield is of such earth-shaking importance that we can justify breaching Wikipedia's customary guidelines Deletion of Association for Research on Ethnicity and Nationalism in the Americas WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4930 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William L. Wilson (Rice University) User:Ciar 19:13, 12 April 2009 (UTC) delete Although a touching memorial, it doesn't meet notability criteria , Deletion of William L. Wilson (Rice University) WP:ACADEMIC||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4931 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AFL Central Queensland Highlands User:Tirin NONE delete Could not find any secondary sources using Google News All Dates. The only primary sources found are derivatives of the wikipedia article. Article does not meet and is unlikely to do so Deletion of AFL Central Queensland Highlands WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4932 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noise Auction User:Snottywong 22:54, 12 July 2010 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Noise Auction WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4933 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuririn User:Sesshomaru 21:47, 30 October 2007 (UTC) comment """doesn't matter how many keeps this page gets. Per policy, """"''Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed""" Deletion of Kuririn WP:VERIFY Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4934 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islam and pork User:Khorshid 09:07, 24 March 2007 (UTC) comment """I hate to tell you guys going for """"merge"""" this, but there is literally ''nothing'' of value in this article to merge. The only two links are to a Google search for """"pork + islam"""" and a blog (see ). So whats with people voting """"merge""""??? Weird""" Deletion of Islam and pork WP:BLOG Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4935 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyperlay User:Serial 15:55, 8 April 2019 (UTC) delete per |policy Deletion of Hyperlay WP:PROMO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4936 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MetaMask User:N2e 11:14, 29 November 2020 (UTC) keep the article is brief, but well-sourced. Wikipedia core policy is |verifiability and the fact that the MetaMask software seems to have played a role in the emerging technology of blockchain for several years now, as is documented by the sources. Clearly meets the notability criteria for an article to exist about it, and I see nothing that would appear |non-neutral Deletion of MetaMask WP:V||WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4937 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of psychedelic rock songs User:Otto4711 00:52, 11 February 2007 (UTC) delete as indiscriminate subjective list, rife with and issues Deletion of List of psychedelic rock songs WP:V||WP:OR Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4938 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wusion User:Armbrust 20:12, 18 September 2010 (UTC) delete as |Wikipedia is not a dictionary Deletion of Wusion WP:NOTDIC Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +4939 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo Meira User:Cloudz679 22:49, 25 September 2014 (UTC) delete article about a subject which does not meet the Deletion of Hugo Meira WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4940 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Smith (racing driver) User:Willsome429 19:00, 1 May 2020 (UTC) keep a search turned up coverage from https://www.foxsports.com/nascar/story/drive-for-diversity-profile-jonathan-smith-012209 Fox Sports and https://blacksportsonline.com/2013/03/bso-interview-with-up-and-coming-nascar-driver-jonathan-smith/ Black Sports Online, as well as PR churns from https://speedwaydigest.com/index.php/news/xfinity-series-news/14679-jorkai-motorsports-to-run-jonathan-smith-in-the-nascar-nationwide-series Speedway Digest and https://bleacherreport.com/articles/113241-baby-its-cold-outside-but-jonathan-smith-is-turning-up-the-heat Bleacher Report, and passing mentions from https://bleacherreport.com/articles/114231-nascar-drive-for-diversity-lineup-announced Bleacher Report and https://theundefeated.com/features/bubba-wallace-nascar-diversity-program-working-or-struggling/ The Undefeated. When I have more time, I will conduct a more extensive search for sources Deletion of Jonathan Smith (racing driver) WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +4941 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craic User:NeilN 00:36, 17 April 2010 (UTC) keep """Despite Wolfkeeper's attempt to portray otherwise, states that """"in some cases, a word or phrase itself may be an encyclopedic subject."""" Quite hilariously, his assertion that """"we don't have articles on neologisms"""" is refuted by looking at the article Neologism, itself a """"word"""" article. It is clear that the community accepts that articles like Yankee and Thou belong on Wikipedia and that it is capable of distinguishing between articles which are dictionary definitions and those which have encyclopedic merit""" Deletion of Craic WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4942 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tobi Kukoyi User:Harsh 04:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC) comment yo|ContentBI}} Please read and understand . It doesn't matter if you are paid to write an article or not, if you have a COI you should not edit an article. Plain and simple. Your ranting is not helping your case. I do not know what sources are considered reliable in Nigeria, but please keep your argument succinct. Give links to the articles you think satisfy and leave it at that. Do not engage in arguments. Make your case and move on Deletion of Tobi Kukoyi WP:COIEDIT||WP:RS Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +4943 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Talking Snowman User:Nsk92 01:54, 15 August 2008 (UTC) delete No evidence of notability under given in the article and none that I could find after quite a bit of googling. Could not find any libraries holding this book in WorldCathttp://www.worldcat.org/search?q=ti%3ATalking+Snowman&qt=advanced (although there is another book there with the same name but by a different writer, Lois Gladys Leppard, that might actually be notable Deletion of The Talking Snowman WP:BK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4944 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio ITU User:SBKSPP 01:20, 17 August 2021 (UTC) merge to Istanbul Technical University. Fails per nom Deletion of Radio ITU WP:STUDENTMEDIA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4945 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Health Insurance Innovations User:Newshunter12 12:05, 8 September 2018 (UTC) delete The article fails and is nothing more then a promotional piece for the company. Being listed on a stock exchange doesn't automatically make a company notable Deletion of Health Insurance Innovations WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4946 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Kennedy in Palestine (1948) User:Mangoe 20:35, 12 March 2010 (UTC) delete as someone's thesis. Every cite is essentially from a primary source; the thesis itself comes from the article's author Deletion of Robert Kennedy in Palestine (1948) WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4947 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hungarian Spectrum User:D 16:53, 7 April 2020 (UTC) keep """This AfD has been open by a IP who tries clearly to delete this article for pure political reasons. The content of the article satisfies all Wikipedia policies, including . The only thing that deserves a discussion here is whether the blog satisfies the notability guidelines, and specially whether it has an international coverage. The fact that the blog is archived by Library of Congress (reference 4) is a first positive indication. A Google search on """"Hungarian spectum"""" provides almost 600 hits, and the entries of the first page of results include medias of France (La Croix), Belgium (RTBF), Italy, Brazil (Zero Hora) and Romania. So, it is clear that this Hungarian blog has a significant international coverage""" Deletion of Hungarian Spectrum WP:SPA||WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Single-purpose account 21 +4948 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Orta User:Fenix 15:23, 27 July 2017 (UTC) delete Fails |NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a |fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy |GNG. The non-routine coverage of him seems to be localized to the Middlesborough area Deletion of Victor Orta WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4949 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kell Hounds (2nd nomination) User:SimpleParadox 18:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC) delete Per otability, this article has none Deletion of Kell Hounds (2nd nomination) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4950 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Suresh Kumar Mishra 'Uratrupta' User:Creffett 13:50, 17 November 2019 (UTC) delete looks like an autobiography, being a translator and having a couple textbooks published doesn't seem especially notable, doesn't look like it passes or Deletion of Dr. Suresh Kumar Mishra 'Uratrupta' WP:NACADEMIC||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4951 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Matas User:DoubleBlue 05:24, 27 September 2008 (UTC) delete fails and with only two passing mentions in Google News, no reliable sources to construct a , , article Deletion of Roger Matas WP:BIO||WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:NOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4952 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cycles per byte user:Andrew 19:01, 4 September 2019 (UTC) keep """Per , this is the """"''perennial source of confusion is that a stub encyclopedia article looks very much like a dictionary entry, and stubs are often poorly written; another is that some paper dictionaries, such as """"pocket"""" dictionaries, lead users to the mistaken belief that dictionary entries are short, and that short article and dictionary entry are therefore equivalent.''"""" The stub can quite readily be expanded from sources such as https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=VaiYIZHduXQC&pg=PA240 Cryptography for Developers""" Deletion of Cycles per byte WP:DICDEF Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +4953 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Ali Naqvi User:Paolo 17:10, 10 January 2006 (UTC) delete """As an example, I have tried a Google search for this persons' name + """"The Role of the Ombudsman and the concept of Administrative Justice""""; this search returns only the author's page in geocities (other than the wikipedia article) http://www.google.com/search?hl=it&q=%22Syed+Ali+Naqvi%22+%22The+Role+of+the+Ombudsman+and+the+concept+of+Administrative+Justice%22&btnG=Cerca&meta= and only got the wikipedia page and the author's page. If this were an """"eminent historian"""" he would have at least be cited somewhere. Anyway, is clear: """"Any edit lacking a source may be removed"""" (in this case, the whole article lacks sources); the new proposal says """"The obligation to provide a reputable source is on editors wishing to include information, not on those seeking to remove it""" Deletion of Syed Ali Naqvi WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4954 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khanbehbin User:Shaundakulbara 06:29, 25 January 2007 (UTC) delete This article provides no |verifiable sources to establish |notability. Its also an un-Wikified mess that shows no respect for thousands of editors who are trying to make Wikipedia not suck Deletion of Khanbehbin WP:V||WP:N Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4955 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newberger's summation formula User:THEN 17:25, 14 August 2008 (UTC) keep Ideally I would have suggested to merge it with something, but since the article deriving the relation has only been cited 13 about 17 times since 1982 it doesn't seem to warrant throwing a relationship which is apparently used very rarely in with something important (e.g. Bessel function) just as a token gesture. I added references so is OK, and as Ascidian pointed out it would seem a name change is in order. And maybe someone can figure out why it's used in plasma applications so to expand the article Deletion of Newberger's summation formula WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +4956 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Izzo User:Jenks24 18:20, 18 April 2012 (UTC) delete Doesn't meet and doesn't have significant coverage in independent sources (only passing mentions) so doesn't meet . Can be recreated when he makes his debut for Adelaide United Deletion of Paul Izzo WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4957 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Pownall User:Gongshow 07:23, 30 April 2014 (UTC) keep Coverage includes http://www.allmusic.com/artist/alan-pownall-mn0002432482/biographyhttp://www.allmusic.com/album/true-love-stories-mw0002021791http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/reviews/alan-pownall-borderline-london-1958574.htmlhttp://www.musicomh.com/reviews/albums/alan-pownall-true-love-storieshttp://www.theguardian.com/music/2010/jul/08/alan-pownall-true-love-stories-cd-review. I've added these sources to the article; subject meets and Deletion of Alan Pownall WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4958 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Batman: Caped Crusader User:Bignole 15:25, 25 January 2009 (UTC) delete per , and possibly Deletion of Batman: Caped Crusader WP:NFF||WP:HOAX Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4959 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth Lovell Stanners User:PKT 13:42, 19 September 2014 (UTC) delete the news pieces I found were all local news outlets referring to her candidacy or her marriage, save the one Globe and Mail article dealing with the airport naming issue. I don't see enough to meet guidelines Deletion of Ruth Lovell Stanners WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4960 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kobort Koffa User:Fenix 13:33, 24 July 2015 (UTC) delete Fails as has not played senior international football nor played in a |fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy |GNG. I am concerned that a lot of of superficially looks like signfiicant coverage is in fact overtly promotional Deletion of Kobort Koffa WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4961 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/General Motors Impact User:Electric 23:34, 11 February 2011 (UTC) keep I think that the page may be a content fork, however it does have specific information about the concept car (Impact) that does not affect the EV-1. It also does not have issues. Everything it talks about is neutral and factual that has supporting quotes and information from the people talked about Deletion of General Motors Impact WP:POV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +4962 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stranger (Kaiju) User:South 01:50, 19 July 2009 (UTC) delete Fails , and Deletion of Stranger (Kaiju) WP:N||WP:OR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4963 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aso Mohammed Ibrahim User:FreeRangeFrog 05:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC) delete Classic Deletion of Aso Mohammed Ibrahim WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +4964 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparisons between Superman and Batman User:Markeer 21:56, 12 February 2007 (UTC) delete nearly the definition of original research. I'm certain one could find individual comic books that have a situation where these two characters behaved toward each other in a certain way...but unless one could find an interview with the writer and artist of that comic book, any interpretation of the MEANING of that encounter only exists in the mind of the individual, not in any objective and verifiable state. An article about a psychology textbook that uses Superman and Batman as examples might be excyclopaedic (something like The Simpsons and Philosophy: The D'oh! of Homer) but a straight up article that attempts to determine meaning, psychology and interpretation to these characters is exactly what is intended to avoid Deletion of Comparisons between Superman and Batman WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +4965 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Himansh Kohli User:Kinu 06:28, 16 November 2012 (UTC) delete The coverage in is very cursory and not enough to warrant a Deletion of Himansh Kohli WP:RS||WP:BLP Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4966 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John C. Bambenek User:Corpx 03:57, 12 July 2007 (UTC) delete those articles have to be about him, not mention him or quote his thoughts about a subject. See for more info Deletion of John C. Bambenek WP:NOTE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4967 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan McGuire User:MacGyverMagic 11:01, 7 May 2007 (UTC) keep subject http://www.google.com/search?q=%22wrestling%22+%22Dan+McGuire%22&rls=com.microsoft:*:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7GGLJ to multiple independant sources. Current lack of sources in the article is something that can be remedied by cleanup rather than deletion. There's only an urgent need for deletion when unreferenced material is negative in such a way it violated Deletion of Dan McGuire WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +4968 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ongiara (ship, 1885) User:Geo 13:24, 19 June 2012 (UTC) keep """I started this article, and a bunch of other articles on ships. No one ever challenges whether we should cover Naval vessels, coast guard vessels, research vessels, because, I suggest, maritime vessels are ''different'' from the vehicles the advice in the essay otability (vehicles) is aimed at. Some years ago I attended a conference where a speaker gave a surprisingly interesting and memorable talk on what we could learn about life in the middle ages from the extensive notes kept by the torture teams employed by the Roman Catholic Church's inquisition. The most memorable point he made is that historians have many mysteries about peoples' lives in the past because certain kinds of information seemed ''""""common knowledge""""'' -- and there was a tendency to not record what was considered ''""""common knowledge""""''. There is the same tendency today to not record ''""""common knowledge""""''. His final point about the inquisition, was that the inquisition's clerks' detailed recording of every tortured confession back then actually answered a lot of historian's questions. I suggest there is a class of topics, that we should cover, even if they seem ''""""common knowledge""""''. Topics that seem """"common knowledge"""", are worth covering, when we have good, reliable sources, because """"common knowledge"""" can be wrong, because this is a world-wide project, and what seems obvious to locals is opaque to readers in ohter parts of the world. Because When we rely on important infrastructure, like ships, ports, railways, airports, rapid transit, expressways, I suggest they are worth covering here, even if nothing out of the ordinary happened, provided we have reliable sources. I suggest even the normal functioning of important infrastructure is worth covering. The advice in the otability (vehicles), in so far as it has value, is addressed to artifacts that are (1) essentially identical to all the others in their class; (2) undertake essentially identical missions to all those in their class; (3) often they undertake routine tasks with other artifacts in their class -- fighter aircraft fly in squadrons; freight trains require multiple locomotives per train; buses keep schedules with other identical buses. An argument can be made that there is no value in individual vehicles, like this, even if they are expensive, because their missions are generally routine and repetitive. Ships aren't like that. Patrol vessels get called upon to perform unscheduled rescues, freighters may go to different ports, on each voyage, because they carry different cargos. Even ships like the Ongiara, which spent most of her working life on one mission, can't adequately be covered in a list article on river ferries, as each river is different""" Deletion of Ongiara (ship, 1885) WP:N||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4969 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamilton Island Triathlon User:LibStar 13:33, 28 November 2010 (UTC) delete WP:NSPORT#Individual_games_or_series|WP:NSPORT and . a relatively small event that does not warrant a WP article Deletion of Hamilton Island Triathlon WP:EVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4970 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swingtips User:4meter4 14:51, 2 October 2019 (UTC) delete It's approaching the threshold, but ultimately there just isn't enough independent coverage to pass Deletion of Swingtips WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4971 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EVO Smart Console User:Mike 21:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC) comment """I was able to locate a few secondary sources after spending some time with Google, including a http://annistonstar.com/view/full_story/2638093/article-Pushing-Buttons--EVO-console-is-lacking review published in the Anniston Star and http://www.maximumpc.com/article/columns/evo_the_unholy_hybrid_opensource_computing_and_consoles another review published in Maximum PC. I also discovered that Thunderbolt (website)|Thunderbolt also http://www.thunderboltgames.com/features/article/under-the-radar-envizions-evo-2-dx-handson-review-for-all-none.html published a review of the EVO 2, but it's Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games/Sources/Archive_2#Thunderbolt|debatable whether that qualifies as a . It seems rather odd to me though that a game console would receive such a minimal amount of media coverage. For anyone doing additional searches on the topic, take note that some media reports described the product as the """"Evo Console"""" or even the """"Evo Game Console""" Deletion of EVO Smart Console WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +4972 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Bentley User:Rtphokie 17:21, 25 July 2008 (UTC) comment While this is true of licensed radio stations, I'm not aware of any implicit notability for radio personalities. applies and insists on significant coverage in verifiable 3rd party sources. This article contains only references to primary sources. The common name is making searches for news articles a bit challenging, Can someone more familiar with him can find some appropriate references to add to this article Deletion of Jason Bentley WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4973 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wut U Talkin Bout User:Esradekan 04:53, 23 October 2008 (UTC) delete fails notability per #Albums.2C_singles_and_songs|#Songs Deletion of Wut U Talkin Bout WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4974 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Melton User:DiamondRemley39 14:45, 17 May 2020 (UTC) comment """Looking at : """"People are likely to be notable if they meet any of the following standards"""" as relates to . So: it does not need to meet . She played a notable character, Daphne Blake, in two films, and there is at least one review out there that talks of her performance in one of those popular films. The article now has a reliable secondary source. Still could use more sources, but that's a whole different animal""" Deletion of Kate Melton WP:ANYBIO||WP:ENT||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4975 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Maire User:Jj137 16:54, 23 November 2007 (UTC) delete fails .   Deletion of Charles Maire WP:FICT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4976 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global storm activity of 2011 (2nd nomination) User:Atmoz 15:27, 29 January 2011 (UTC) delete Wikipedia is not a indiscriminate collection of weather reports. Deletion of Global storm activity of 2011 (2nd nomination) WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4977 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonnie Blossman [[User talk:202.124.73.31|talk]]) 06:56, 8 July 2013 (UTC) comment Fails with a h-index of 2. I'm seeing some news coverage relating to conflicts between the cast of the TV show, but that's . Given the bizarre combination of interests the subject has, there may be coverage I've missed. -- Special:Contributions/202.124.73.31|202.124.73.31 Deletion of Bonnie Blossman WP:PROF||WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4978 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darrin Doyle User:David 21:44, 17 April 2017 (UTC) delete I found some blog reviews of his books but nothing major and reliable enough for Deletion of Darrin Doyle WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4979 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manuel Jalón Corominas NONE NONE keep There are multiple, reliable sources presented in the article. These sources include the state-owned, public broadcaster RTVE and the 125-years old newspaper Heraldo de Aragón. Besides passing , the subject also meets , receiving honors in the city of Zaragoza, and in the town of Trasmoz Deletion of Manuel Jalón Corominas WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4980 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caleb Shomo [[User talk:76.252.203.242|talk]]) 21:43, 11 June 2010 (UTC) keep if the notability from was included. Special:Contributions/76.252.203.242|76.252.203.242 Deletion of Caleb Shomo WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4981 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travis Clark User:Jasynnash2 12:35, 15 September 2008 (UTC) merge per Deletion of Travis Clark WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4982 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sky Sanctuary Zone User:ColourBurst 22:18, 29 September 2006 (UTC) delete It's not |neutral (it has weasel words in it), there aren't any sources (and there aren't many third-party sources who would write about a single level in a game), and anything else written would be |game guidish Deletion of Sky Sanctuary Zone WP:NPOV||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +4983 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Difference between Delhi and New Delhi User:Shawn 18:13, 30 October 2017 (UTC) delete """per nom. The ead to New Delhi states clearly enough: """"Although colloquially Delhi and New Delhi are used interchangeably to refer to the National Capital Territory of Delhi, these are two distinct entities, with New Delhi forming a small part of Delhi."""" If the article creator thinks some valid point has been omitted in these articles, he should attempt to add there, provided it is not original research or a personal essay""" Deletion of Difference between Delhi and New Delhi WP:L Wikipedia:Lists 36 +4984 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rogers Hall User:Mikeman67 16:18, 4 March 2014 (UTC) keep Changing my vote here to keep after Altairisfar pointed out it's on the National Register of Historic Places. Personally I'm not convinced that being listed guarantees notability (the notability requirements for the National Register may be very different than Wikipedia's, so I don't see why we should adopt theirs), but I can see the building had some significant events occurring in the past that sufficiently meet , including the camping of Union and Confederate troops on its grounds {{NRHP url|id=74000415|title Deletion of Rogers Hall WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4985 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hangry User:The 17:47, 8 August 2010 (UTC) delete per |NOTDICT and total failure of ; a local website and Urbandictionary.com (although the latter is quite amusing) are not nearly enough notability Deletion of Hangry WP:NOTDICT||WP:V Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +4986 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conor and Jay User:Cocytus 05:27, 11 January 2010 (UTC) delete doesn't appear to satisfy , and I don't think the GTA appearances merit inclusion as it's really rather trivial significance, I feel Deletion of Conor and Jay WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4987 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Australian Open – Women's singles final User:Local 06:03, 26 June 2021 (UTC) delete I think this narrows down to what 'significant' means in the context of 'significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject'. Many tennis matches in grand slam series will receive coverage in reliable sources - you will be able to find a dozen or so when Djokovic beats Federer in a semi-final, but this doesn't make every semi-final notable and thus worthy of an article (subject to ). The coverage should be a dominating event - such as if something absolutely groundbreaking happened (eg, the 'ground' on the tennis court broke open) - causing it to be a notable event. I think that's a way this issue can be reconcilled. There is nothing particularly notable about this match. It should be deleted. Mostly neutral on whether intro content should be merged, but I don't think that the set-by-set breakdown is really necessary Deletion of 2018 Australian Open – Women's singles final WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4988 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul R. Gregory User:Lightburst 15:59, 14 June 2020 (UTC) keep WP:CREATIVE#1 non-trivial coverage of this subject also exists. The artist is clearly a leader in his field of work. Some of these sources are passing mention, some are interviews, however collectively they show that the subject passes https://heavymusicartwork.com/paul-r-gregory-studio54/ Heavy Music Artwork, http://www.tolkienlibrary.com/press/1082-Art-of-Paul-Raymond-Gregory.php Tolkien Library, https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/features/bloodstock-open-air-festival-art-metal-paul-gregory-a7880701.html Independent, https://books.google.com/books?id=duLYBgAAQBAJ&pg=PT138&lpg=PT138&dq=Paul+R.+Gregory+artist&source=bl&ots=P6CzZFNQt7&sig=ACfU3U02jIVF2Zdqk9FH2Rbjipx3aa-c4g&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi1rOTz04HqAhVxQjABHQiVASc4ChDoATAFegQIChAB#v=onepage&q=Paul%20R.%20Gregory%20artist&f=false Master of the Moon: Ronnie James Dio, https://www.trebuchet-magazine.com/tolkien-art-metal-paul-r-gregory-interview/ Trebuchet Magazine Interview, https://greatalbumcovers.com/paul-raymond-gregory-heavy-metals-lord-of-the-rings/ Great album Covers Deletion of Paul R. Gregory WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4989 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Columbia University College Democrats User:Metropolitan90 09:02, 24 February 2008 (UTC) delete per as has been done with other similar organizations Deletion of Columbia University College Democrats WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4990 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurumaa User:Iain99 14:41, 27 July 2007 (UTC) keep based on recent edits. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gurumaa&oldid=147325882 This version is just about OK, but edits like http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gurumaa&oldid=146546860 this one are pure promotion. Note that to comply with |NPOV her teachings need to be clearly labelled as teachings, not described as fact Deletion of Gurumaa WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +4991 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toy Meets Girl User:DHowell 02:31, 18 August 2007 (UTC) merge """to List of Robot Chicken episodes. says nothing about deleting articles, rather it says """"''If the article(s) contain little content, consider merging or redirecting them into another article (e.g. an article about the show itself, an article that is a list of episodes of the show, or an article that summarizes the plot for one season of the show""" Deletion of Toy Meets Girl WP:EPISODE Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +4992 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Professional Practices for Business Continuity Management User:ZI 16:29, 19 July 2018 (UTC) delete Does not meet . Warm Regards Deletion of The Professional Practices for Business Continuity Management WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4993 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arctic Monkeys' third studio album User:Stifle 19:12, 13 May 2008 (UTC) delete all X's #th album/single/EP articles. If they don't have an announced name they are an inherent violation of Deletion of Arctic Monkeys' third studio album WP:CBALL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +4994 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caribbean Bird Vendor User:Coolabahapple 08:05, 2 May 2020 (UTC) comment """this appears to be an important example of wilson's art, in addition to being chosen by ''Emerging Infectious Diseases (journal)|Emerging Infectious Diseases'' for one of their Journal covers (as brought out by {{u|ThatMontrealIP}} above) with a small but |non trivial discussion/analysis of it, it was also chosen by the curator to be the cover illustration for the exhibition catalogue of ''https://www.worldcat.org/title/art-of-ellis-wilson/oclc/900344960?referer=di&ht=edition The Art of Ellis Wilson'', with the Biography#Ellis Wilson|referenced mention of it in the artist's article (4th paragraph), its almost, but not quite there, in terms of wikinotablenes for a standalone, but a '''redirect/merge''' to a """"Works"""" section in Ellis Wilson may be appropriate""" Deletion of Caribbean Bird Vendor WP:TRIVIA Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +4995 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rizky Syawaludin User:Argyle 16:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Rizky Syawaludin WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4996 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strong (relative detectability) [[User talk:202.124.73.175|talk]]) 03:16, 9 November 2011 (UTC) delete as . Magnitude (astronomy) and Signal strength cover the same topic in far more detail. -- Special:Contributions/202.124.73.175|202.124.73.175 Deletion of Strong (relative detectability) WP:DICDEF Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +4997 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlogExplosion User:Xtifr 22:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC) delete per nom. I was tempted to suggest speedy per #G11|G11, but initial creator seems to be Wikipedian in good standing, so I don't think it was actually intended as spam Deletion of BlogExplosion WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +4998 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Burton (footballer) User:Fenix 12:30, 4 January 2013 (UTC) delete fails and . Difficult to think of a more minor footballer Deletion of Paul Burton (footballer) WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +4999 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clayton McKinney User:TreyGeek 16:06, 29 May 2010 (UTC) delete fails and - as per Deletion of Clayton McKinney WP:N||WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5000 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhythm Method (a cappella group) User:Moswento 07:30, 20 April 2010 (UTC) comment That is not a valid argument, as articles are judged on individual merit, and a capella groups must currently be judged under Wikipedia notability guidelines per . You could always nominate the other groups' articles for deletion, if you feel they fail notability guidelines, although Emocapella seem to have some claim to notability in terms of press coverage Deletion of Rhythm Method (a cappella group) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5001 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/REVE Antivirus User:Tpdwkouaa 20:15, 16 June 2016 (UTC) comment Additionally, {{ping|Wrtamal.bd}}, if you have a potential with the subject of this article, you should https://bd.linkedin.com/in/waliur-rashid-tamal-a1a587114 really https://twitter.com/tamalmeghbalok declare it Deletion of REVE Antivirus WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +5002 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prateek Parmar User:Timtrent 14:01, 18 June 2020 (UTC) comment """I don't think you can dismiss the sources as """"only social networks"""" though I agree that it could and should be better sourced. I accepted the draft aware that it is a created article, conscious that it would need to fight its corner in a deletion process. I have decided to stay '''neutral''' in the discussion""" Deletion of Prateek Parmar WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +5003 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Angry Video Game Nerd episodes User:Postdlf 18:24, 5 January 2019 (UTC) keep per above, I see no argument presented that would justify overturning the past consensus on this page that it is an appropriate , and no argument at all that is rooted in a demonstrated understanding of the subject (as would be necessary to have a meaningful discussion of the merits of splitting). The episodes are reliable sources for their own content so I don't see an inherent issue with sourcing either. And as the series as a whole is indisputably notable, and the episodes comprise the series, this would then also pass . There is no need for the episodes to be independently notable such that they would merit their own articles. The whole motivation for the nomination seems to be a new editor complaining about what they think was inconsistent treatment of other content, i.e. Deletion of List of Angry Video Game Nerd episodes WP:SPLIT||WP:LISTN||WP:WAX Wikipedia:Splitting 82 +5004 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cool Handshakes NONE NONE delete No notability whatsoever: and purely unencyclopedic material Deletion of Cool Handshakes WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5005 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Uppal User:Skeezix1000 15:21, 4 July 2007 (UTC) delete """Failed candidates are not inherently notable, and do not meet . His stint as a radio host has the potential to make him noteworthy, but there is nothing in the article that suggests that is the case. As for the assertions on this page that """"anyone who knows anything about Canadian politics will understand that he will win in his seat"""" and so forth, since when do the speculation, hunches, predictions, guesses and offers-to-eat-socks of a small group of Wikipedia editors trump and """ Deletion of Tim Uppal WP:BIO||WP:OR||WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5006 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elián User:Northamerica1000 04:20, 13 December 2017 (UTC) keep per a review of available sources, passes / Deletion of Elián WP:NFP||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5007 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nisha JamVwal User:RegentsPark 14:30, 31 July 2014 (UTC) delete Can't find anything other than the TOI article. As Redtigerxyz says, that's one award and not a significant one. The links at the bottom of the article are all not really sources. And, merely being a reporter for a newspaper is nowhere near sufficient for Deletion of Nisha JamVwal WP:JOURNALIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5008 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Diamond (2nd nomination) User:K 19:03, 14 October 2016 (UTC) delete per ; strictly a vanity page Deletion of Jason Diamond (2nd nomination) WP:PROMO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5009 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people from Harvey, Illinois User:Lugnuts 18:55, 11 March 2014 (UTC) keep per Deletion of List of people from Harvey, Illinois WP:CLN Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates 5 +5010 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calzavara User:Bearian 14:41, 3 March 2020 (UTC) delete per . , and . It makes covers for cell towers to make you think you're looking at a tree or something else other than a cell tower Deletion of Calzavara WP:SPAM||WP:MILL||WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Spam 26 +5011 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killer (card game) User:Edison 21:09, 17 April 2011 (UTC) delete unless sources are found to satisfy |notability Deletion of Killer (card game) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5012 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wonky (music) (2nd nomination) User:Esradekan 23:26, 28 December 2008 (UTC) keep well written and wp:rs|referenced. Smells like |socks around here though Deletion of Wonky (music) (2nd nomination) WP:SOCK Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry 80 +5013 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attard F.C. User:Aloolkaparatha 09:45, 22 April 2021 (UTC) keep per Deletion of Attard F.C. WP:FOOTYN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5014 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Kerruish User:GargAvinash 19:19, 3 February 2020 (UTC) delete Article is wtitten like promotion indicating only awards received . Also poorly sourced Deletion of Sarah Kerruish WP:G11 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +5015 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IndianCashback.com User:Norvoid 11:37, 20 November 2015 (UTC) delete no indication of notability per , and no mention on secondary, , just lots of self-promotion on social media etc Deletion of IndianCashback.com WP:WEB||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5016 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kittenpants User:JFHJr 05:58, 12 November 2011 (UTC) delete This isn't the subject of substantial reliable coverage, nor is it award-winning, non-trivial, or anything else at . It's apparently defunct, so it doesn't seem likely to gain notability in the future. ...Ex-staff members? Really? No better coattails Deletion of Kittenpants WP:NMEDIA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5017 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cargurus User:Arichnad 19:36, 8 August 2006 (UTC) comment Don't confuse |prod and |speedy. They are different. '''~a Deletion of Cargurus WP:PROD||WP:CSD Wikipedia:Proposed deletion 92 +5018 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lacework User:HighKing 18:25, 30 January 2018 (UTC) delete No indications of notability, references fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and . Article is also overly promotional both in tone and content, fails Deletion of Lacework WP:NCORP||WP:SPIP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5019 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imee Marcos' Misuse of Tobacco Excise Tax Funds User:FenixFeather 00:03, 20 September 2018 (UTC) keep I think Alternatvity has done a great job of changing the article to something more encyclopedic. It's a close one but the article now passes , imo. &ndash Deletion of Imee Marcos' Misuse of Tobacco Excise Tax Funds WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5020 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Ezz User:Hut 10:50, 16 May 2011 (UTC) delete per and unless someone can find a source. There are a few mentions of a political activist called Mohammed Ezzeldin but I'm fairly sure that's not the subject of this article. Appears to have been written by the subject ({{user|Mahmoud ez Deletion of Mohammad Ezz WP:N||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5021 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Levan Kirakosyan User:Mdtemp 19:02, 18 March 2014 (UTC) keep His EBU title is enough to meet Deletion of Levan Kirakosyan WP:NBOX Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5022 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semboga Roy User:onel5969 03:08, 11 August 2021 (UTC) delete Not enough in-depth coverage in-depth coverage to meet Deletion of Semboga Roy WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5023 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golconda Express User:Colonel 01:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC) keep Fairly obviously notable as one can see from inspection of the sources per . These include lots of news coverage of a major derailment; coverage in books, including a complete book dedicated exclusively to this topic; and details of speed records and other facts about the service. And that's just in English; no doubt there is much more in the local languages of Urdu and Telegu, which will not appear in ordinary searches Deletion of Golconda Express WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +5024 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elf Sternberg (2nd nomination) User:Georgewilliamherbert 00:56, 24 September 2007 (UTC) keep Elf's notability in Usenet was unquestioned at the time, and is well documented (in some cases by |reliable sources, in some cases not). There seems to be no genuine disagreement that the sources are accurate - the claim seems to be that not enough of them are reliable by WP standards. If there were serious BLP concerns, one could challenge info on that basis, but this is a deletion debate, in which the notability of the subject and accuracy of the article are the primary concerns. There seems to be no legitimate claim that the article's inaccurate, or that Elf wasn't notable. Asking for more reliable sources when there's a plethora of evidence that he was is a shrubbery. Keep Deletion of Elf Sternberg (2nd nomination) WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5025 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audra Paquette User:Lemongirl942 03:09, 17 October 2016 (UTC) delete per . We seriously don't have enough sources to write an article. The information is already covered in the respective articles Deletion of Audra Paquette WP:WHYN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5026 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Denholm User:Walls 16:17, 26 June 2013 (UTC) delete Fail and Deletion of Danny Denholm WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5027 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demba Diakhaté User:GiantSnowman 08:36, 13 August 2013 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Demba Diakhaté WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5028 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarun s Bisht User:Umakant 17:15, 10 August 2020 (UTC) merge A Google search of him only brings up references that mention him in passing with no in-dept coverage. It may be a case of and redirect to Blackboard vs Whiteboard would be appropriate Deletion of Tarun s Bisht WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +5029 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acropolis (band) User:Esradekan 01:10, 16 July 2008 (UTC) delete article fails to establish notability as per Deletion of Acropolis (band) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5030 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cache Olson User:E 20:54, 26 January 2017 (UTC) delete as Deletion of Cache Olson WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +5031 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J.D. Durkin User:Bearian 00:36, 16 June 2017 (UTC) delete per , , and . Nobody has stepped forward after many days to rescue this mess. He hosts a cable show on an obscure channel. So did my oldest brother. So what Deletion of J.D. Durkin WP:SNOW||WP:TNT||WP:MILL Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +5032 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Get Paper User:RP459 22:03, 14 February 2010 (UTC) delete fails & no significant 3rd party coverage which would allow it to pass Deletion of I Get Paper WP:NOTABILITY||WP:NSONG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5033 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neehar Raina (2nd nomination) User:Less 20:43, 23 May 2020 (UTC) delete I failed to find any reliable sources apart from a couple mentioning the inclusion controversy. Seems like an , but the coverage wasn't widespread either. Fails Deletion of Neehar Raina (2nd nomination) WP:1E||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5034 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gail Leven Pollock User:Ohnoitsjamie 14:32, 27 December 2015 (UTC) delete Passing mention in the NYT is about all we have here. After three weeks, no one has been able to drop any info here regarding how she could possible meet or Deletion of Gail Leven Pollock WP:BIO||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5035 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Indira Priyadarshini Ravindran User:Joe 18:54, 9 September 2016 (UTC) delete I've just speedied this as a copyright violation, but in case that's declined for some reason:) no indication that Ravindran meets . She is an Assistant Prof. and completed her PhD less than ten years ago, so I'd say it's clearly for her to have made a significant impact Deletion of Dr. Indira Priyadarshini Ravindran WP:PROF||WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5036 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dear Sherlock User:KaisaL 23:56, 23 March 2017 (UTC) delete The television segment they were in doesn't meet because it doesn't appear to be a major national television network in Portugal, nor do we have sourcing that it was for broadcast or substantial. A band around for seven years in the 2010s ought to have lots of coverage by now, and they do not, one local BBC article isn't enough Deletion of Dear Sherlock WP:NBAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5037 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Seven Worlds (2nd nomination) User:Jfdwolff 11:31, 20 October 2006 (UTC) delete """If this conceptual framework exists at all in Kabbalah (which is not quite clear to me) it is not worth its own article. Presently it is unclear why it is titled this way, it is |unsourced (just blindly citing ''Kabbalah'' as a source is like saying that """"smoking causes cancer, says ''science''""""). No merge candidate, no context available for a good merge""" Deletion of The Seven Worlds (2nd nomination) WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5038 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pacific Paranormal Investigations User:LuckyLouie 20:37, 23 September 2010 (UTC) delete """per as there are no reliable sources found that confer notability. Content such as """"This group has its own Facebook page"""" is also a likely sign of """ Deletion of Pacific Paranormal Investigations WP:NOTE||WP:VANITY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5039 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1MDB Airlines User:Oripaypaykim 12:05, 17 December 2015 (UTC) delete it appears was able to no official announcement are notable but Deletion of 1MDB Airlines WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5040 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shepherd's Hill Academy User:Bearian 21:36, 9 January 2020 (UTC) keep Based on media coverage, it appears |to skim by because I found |at least two reliable sources with technically significant coverage. It has Deletion of Shepherd's Hill Academy WP:BARE||WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5041 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paisa paisa User:MichaelQSchmidt 19:12, 30 July 2012 (UTC) merge """per to De Dana Dan#Theme song, where this (now-sourced) song is spoken of in context to that film. One addresses the existance of earlier versions of this song by tightening one's search paramaters to https://www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%22Paisa+paisa%22&num=50#q=%22Paisa+paisa%22+,+%22De+Dana+Dan%22&hl=en&tbm=nws&prmd=imvns&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=p8YWUPDnGMPIqgH5r4CIDQ&ved=0CCUQpwUoBQ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&fp=d8e6d11dd8fbde3d&biw=1024&bih=616 """"Paisa paisa"""" , """"De Dana Dan"""" to then find sources which speak toward this particular version being covered in news media in relationship to ''De Dana Dan'', being released before the film, and being considered a chart hit. I gave the article an |overhaul to address earlier issues of its format and lacking use of available sources,http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paisa_paisa&diff=504975556&oldid=503267590 and pre-emptively included pertinant information at its target,http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=De_Dana_Dan&diff=504977779&oldid=504604852 before coming to this discussion""" Deletion of Paisa paisa WP:MUSIC||WP:HANDLE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5042 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easy Records User:Tychocat 14:54, 30 June 2006 (UTC) delete fails , , and . Is an advertisement, article text is lifted verbatim from a http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=58918276 MySpace page Deletion of Easy Records WP:WEB||WP:MUSIC||WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5043 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boddole Zer User:Shooterwalker 15:35, 10 August 2010 (UTC) merge due to lack of third party sources to . Would be enough for deletion but will support merge for the sake of consensus Deletion of Boddole Zer WP:verify notability Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5044 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Chestney (2nd nomination) User:Xxanthippe 05:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC) delete Sources are not adequate to support or uthor Deletion of Kim Chestney (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:A Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5045 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter Ehrich User:Qworty 08:48, 5 February 2011 (UTC) comment The who is using Wikipedia to attack this living person also recently vandalized the AfD tag http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Walter_Ehrich&diff=prev&oldid=412119695. If I see any further policy violations on the part of the user I will bring the matter up at AN/I. This atrocious behavior is not what WP is supposed to be about Deletion of Walter Ehrich WP:SPA Wikipedia:Single-purpose account 21 +5046 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Hampshire County Historical Highway Markers User:FCYTravis 07:39, 18 December 2005 (UTC) keep """if |verified that these markers are erected by the state as part of a historical landmark signage system, a-la the roadside """"California State Historic Landmark"""" plaques installed by the California Department of Parks and Recreation""" Deletion of List of Hampshire County Historical Highway Markers WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5047 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheese for Chee Day User:Tyrenius 18:34, 19 May 2006 (UTC) delete Anyone can edit wikipedia, but there are some guidelines to read, like . However, good luck with the fund-raising Deletion of Cheese for Chee Day WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5048 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panos Armenakas (2nd nomination) User:GiantSnowman 08:58, 10 May 2015 (UTC) delete clearly fails , the question is whether or not he meets - this is a close one, but I'd be inclined to say the coverage is not significant enough / slightly too to satisfy GNG Deletion of Panos Armenakas (2nd nomination) WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5049 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of lifestyles (2nd nomination) User:Stifle 19:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC) delete per points 3, 6 and 8 Deletion of List of lifestyles (2nd nomination) WP:LC Wikipedia:Listcruft 66 +5050 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigger Hills User:Northamerica1000 06:17, 21 September 2011 (UTC) keep Passes . Move the data to article titled, Ernie Hills, as he was referred to Deletion of Nigger Hills WP:NRU Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5051 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shangwen Fang (2nd nomination) User:Broadweighbabe 03:35, 20 March 2009 (UTC) delete per WP:BLP1E and /CA Deletion of Shangwen Fang (2nd nomination) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5052 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Carter III User:Fieari 03:32, 21 June 2016 (UTC) keep Obscure yes, but meets with multiple bylined articles from notable, non-local-only newspapers Deletion of George Carter III WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5053 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hair tongs alarm User:DMacks 08:32, 5 November 2009 (UTC) delete """Can't find any RS, none supplied by article contributors either. The key claim is that these can keep me from using a curling iron that is too cool and risk """"potentially life-threatening hair damage""""? O...kay. """"Many students choose the hair tongs alarm as a project option for electronics GCSE."""" That seals it.../ non-notable school project""" Deletion of Hair tongs alarm WP:NFT||WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +5054 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Broudy User:Piotrus 02:01, 23 April 2020 (UTC) keep I can only assume BEFORE was not done, since it's not hard to find refs like the ones I just reformatted (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Broudy&type=revision&diff=952593099&oldid=952592851&diffmode=source) which clearly suggest he is notable, having had other scholars write articles about him. He clearly meets Deletion of Harry Broudy WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5055 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Floast User:Danny 01:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC) delete Wikipedia is |not for stupid in-jokes Deletion of Floast WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5056 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Schaack User:Nsk92 12:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC) keep I had earlier (after the AfD nomination but before DE updates and revisions to the article) added a mention to the article regarding the Lynwood W. Swanson Promise for Scientific Research Award from the M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust, which is a reasonably significant award, certainly counting towards #C1. A few comments to the nominator: The NSF grant in question was not an ordinary grant but a National Science Foundation CAREER Award. These grants are much more prestigious and harder to get than ordinary grants, and they do contribute to academic notability, at least somewhat. In fact I think this info should be re-added to the article. About the h-index of 18. There is no such thing as a standard h-index for an Associate Professor. H-index varies greatly by discipline (and also by the source of data used, GScholar, WebOfScience, Scopus etc). In lower citation disciplines like mathematics most full professors probably retire with GScholar h-index lower than 18. Sarah Schaack works in a higher citation field but still even there, for somebody to reach an h-index of 18 in ten years (her Phd is from 2008) looks impressive to me. In any case, I think there is enough here to satisfy #C1, for the reasons above and those given by David Eppsein Deletion of Sarah Schaack WP:PROF||WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5057 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republican establishment User:Bearian 20:52, 9 May 2016 (UTC) keep an essential topic in this year's United States elections, and it is not so bad as |to require a complete re-do Deletion of Republican establishment WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +5058 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Abbadi User:Lifebaka 22:39, 16 April 2008 (UTC) delete The guy only has four fights, which doesn't indicate notability. No other indication is given. Also lacks references for most of it, so most of the content fails Deletion of Danny Abbadi WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +5059 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suman Sahai User:RayAYang 18:57, 29 April 2013 (UTC) keep People who pass the GNG because of plagiarism or other scientific misconduct are still notable, even if they otherwise would not have been. The article in this case is from a RS, and discusses the subject's misconduct in depth and at length, as well as the significance of the plagiarism in the context of her relatively prominent role otherwise. Subject may well have passed without this controversy, this simply guarantees it Deletion of Suman Sahai WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5060 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Dawood Yaseen User:Fenix 17:15, 6 November 2017 (UTC) keep per |good work by Deletion of Mohammed Dawood Yaseen WP:HEY Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard 85 +5061 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristy Joy User:Porqin 20:24, 8 August 2006 (UTC) delete Fails , no real estabilishment of |notability Deletion of Cristy Joy WP:BIO||WP:NN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5062 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyle Center for Regenerative Studies [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 22:45, 12 December 2012 (UTC) delete Fails notability Deletion of Lyle Center for Regenerative Studies WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5063 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Javier Serafini User:NemesisAT NONE keep Not only per ―like Deletion of Javier Serafini WP:HEY Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard 85 +5064 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GScentral User:Parasytic 23:35, 5 February 2007 (UTC) delete Does not appear to hold any encyclopedic value as described in Deletion of GScentral WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5065 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragonfly CMS User:SMcCandlish 21:26, 3 August 2007 (UTC) keep Is under active development by at least two editors, and tagged as such. Does not raise issues at all, any more than any other article on a piece of software. issues likely to be rectified by on-going editing, and that will satisfy . If the editors working on it stop working on it after AfD, AfD it again, noting that promise to fix the article was not met Deletion of Dragonfly CMS WP:SPAM||WP:V||WP:N Wikipedia:Spam 26 +5066 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Wands User:Ravenswing 13:54, 30 June 2011 (UTC) delete """The ''NY Times,'' ''Variety'' and ''Playbill'' are certainly reliable sources, but not a single damn source either in the article or in the laundry list posted above discuss Wands in pretty much ''any'' detail, let alone the """"significant detail"""" the GNG requires. Her name is ''mentioned'' in articles mentioning several other actors, and that's about it. Quite aside from the probable issue, the Keep proponents seem bedazzled by """"OMG look, a list of SOURCES!!!!"""" without actually examining those sources to see if they mention the subject in significant detail. I've yet to examine one that does. WP:GNG '''explicitly''' states that a sentence or two constitutes a trivial mention, and few of these sources devote as much as a single sentence to Ms. Wands""" Deletion of Susan Wands WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +5067 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exercise High Mark User:Petebutt 18:45, 30 December 2014 (UTC) delete Iconcur with Milborne. Excercise are run of the mill, unencyclopaedic, (unless somethinghappens because of one that is notable in it's own right), and non-notable., notnews, etc.etc Deletion of Exercise High Mark WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5068 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Phillips (author, composer) User:Walwal20 13:27, 4 October 2020 (UTC) delete Fails as his books did not cause sufficient impact; also fails as there is no coverage of him Deletion of Thomas Phillips (author, composer) WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5069 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Shells User:Talkingbirds 16:45, 13 September 2009 (UTC) delete no charting albums (actually, that unreleased album should be up for AFD too), non-notable label (which was recently speedied), nominated for a minor award that they might not even win (we'll see tonight). No prejudice against recreation if they do explode onto the charts overnight...or something like that. As of now, they fail for the reasons described above Deletion of The Shells WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5070 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orange paper reading User:Nsk92 14:54, 14 May 2008 (UTC) delete per nom. Nothing to show notability per . The article lists a single reference which is a broken linkhttp://bellcreek.org/studentministries%7C Deletion of Orange paper reading WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5071 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lijeesh User:Akhiljaxxn 14:34, 30 July 2020 (UTC) delete per nom, subject fails and Deletion of Lijeesh WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5072 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Adams (judge) NONE NONE delete """The nomination states the reason is . It is not optional. None of the keep votes address the fact that Adams is known for one event (and the """"If the event is significant..."""" test hasn't been even discussed above by keep voters). I'll add some text from BL1PE here to guide editors who want to argue that it does not apply to William Adams""" Deletion of William Adams (judge) WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +5073 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of shopping centres in Australia User:Bidgee 20:50, 30 November 2010 (UTC) keep If we are going to apply , then most lists (such as the list of National Parks, lists of buildings) would be deleted. While I dislike lists common-sense is that the lists are not tourist guides but are lists of notable locations which don't have any street address or phone numbers in the list (e.g. List of shopping centres in Australia) and are far more safer from then List of shopping centres in Australia by size (which most of the Gross Leasable Areas is most likely entered by POV-pushers who think their local shopping centre is bigger then another) which is full of POV and Deletion of List of shopping centres in Australia WP:NOTGUIDE||WP:POV||WP:OR Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5074 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangladesh Tribune User:Worldbruce 19:20, 22 April 2019 (UTC) delete Ephemeral news portals come and go all the time in Bangladesh. The ''Bangladesh Tribune'' website went belly up in 2015. The first cited source is dead, and from the construction of the url, appears to be bogus. The other source is about another company. The ''Bangladesh Tribune'' isn't mentioned in the ''Encyclopedia of International Media and Communications'', the ABYZ ''Bangladesh Newspapers and News Media Guide'', or ''Willings Press Guide''. Searches of the usual Google types find no cases of a reliable source citing ''Bangladesh Tribune'', and zero independent coverage. Fails Deletion of Bangladesh Tribune WP:NMEDIA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5075 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naseer Mirza User:onel5969 17:00, 16 November 2016 (UTC) delete as said above, a promotional piece, does not pass Deletion of Naseer Mirza WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5076 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Paddock User:Mhhossein 17:44, 4 October 2017 (UTC) comment Why can it be an exception for Deletion of Stephen Paddock WP:1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5077 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of American politicians convicted of crimes user:tmorton166 17:49, 29 November 2010 (UTC) keep concur with DGG. That a politician is convicted of a crime is always significant in relation to their public life (although, disclaimer; only those crimes committed whilst in office, or in relation to their office). |BLP policy for this issue is designed to ensure we are sensitive to the issues of using pejorative terms in relation to living persons - it does ''not'' mean we do not aply such terms Deletion of List of American politicians convicted of crimes WP:BLPCAT Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +5078 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ufc-pride User:Metros232 15:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC) delete Notability not established through |reliable or |verifiable sources Deletion of Ufc-pride WP:RS||WP:V Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5079 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Norwegians by religion User:Dew 23:33, 12 September 2010 (UTC) keep Wikpedia is not a |case study Deletion of List of Norwegians by religion WP:NOTCASE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5080 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of computer pranks User:Stephen 06:38, 6 August 2006 (UTC) delete contents seems entirely - the judgement about what should be included is not backed by published sources Deletion of List of computer pranks WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5081 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Theta Sigma User:Terrillja 18:11, 29 December 2008 (UTC) delete nothing to show why this is notable, and the creator identifies himself by name on his userpage, then names himself as one of the founders of the fraternity. and . The fact this article has been speedy deleted and recreated six times in the last yearhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Alpha_Theta_Sigma implies that consensus is that this group is not notable Deletion of Alpha Theta Sigma WP:COI||WP:PROMOTION Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +5082 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Miller (writer) NONE NONE delete She doesn't meet or Deletion of Mary Miller (writer) WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5083 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films portraying paedophilia or sexual abuse of minors User:Kendrick7 02:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC) delete Probably there are enough academic sources to create a general Pedophilia in popular culture overview, but we have ategories which are a perfectly good substitute for such lists Deletion of List of films portraying paedophilia or sexual abuse of minors WP:C Wikipedia:Copyrights 60 +5084 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Body 1 User:Dalbury 04:29, 3 December 2005 (UTC) delete advertising and fails Deletion of Body 1 WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5085 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Natural Food Zone User:Ignatzmice 22:45, 25 April 2013 (UTC) delete """ec}} reads like ery (just as one example, 5 50M page hits ≠ 5 50M users), and the name """"Coolboygcp"""" implies a COI (site is created by George Poulos), though the account's been in use for a year and a half. Not sure if I'm using Topsy right, but I can't find the supposed tweets by @barackobama http://topsy.com/s?q=food+zone+from%3Abarackobama http://topsy.com/s/naturalfoodblog+from%3ABarackObama http://topsy.com/allnaturalfoodzone.blogspot.com/?contains=from%3Abarackobama or @whitehouse http://topsy.com/s?q=naturalfoodzone+from%3Awhitehouse http://topsy.com/s?q=naturalfoodblog+from%3Awhitehouse http://topsy.com/allnaturalfoodzone.blogspot.com/?contains=from%3Awhitehouse. No indication of real notability; fails """ Deletion of All Natural Food Zone WP:PUFF||WP:WEBCRIT Wikipedia:Wikipuffery 7 +5086 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jocelyne Couture-Nowak (5th nomination) User:Gorgan 14:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC) comment Jocelyne Couture-Nowak is a person who came to fame by being shot in the Virginia Tech massacre. At first, this sounds like a clear-cut case of |BIO1E. Unfortunately the waters are muddied by the fact that after death, several media outlets decided to turn her into a hero by publishing stories about her life. Technically, these news stories assert notability according to the |general notability criteria. Some would argue that this is sufficient for inclusion of the article. Others would argue that common sense needs to be applied, and that since this person's only actual claim-to-fame is the Virginia Tech massacre, |BIO1E still applies. &mdash Deletion of Jocelyne Couture-Nowak (5th nomination) WP:BIO1E||WP:N||WP:BIO1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5087 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flags of country subdivisions User:Stuartyeates 08:45, 11 October 2011 (UTC) delete fails . Completely unreferenced Deletion of Flags of country subdivisions WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5088 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Posillico User:Carioca 20:35, 5 October 2010 (UTC) delete he fails both and Deletion of Joseph Posillico WP:ATHLETE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5089 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Decades in Colour User:MichaelQSchmidt 01:35, 7 April 2015 (UTC) delete per being |TOO SOON. Even though we might consider an official New Zealand http://www.nzonair.govt.nz/news/articles/colourful-line-up-of-programmes-get-the-green-light/ government source reliable enough, the un-aired project lacks enough other coverage to meet | (paragraph 3 Deletion of Decades in Colour WP:NYF||WP:NFF Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +5090 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunnyhillselementary User:Cullen328 03:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC) merge to Issaquah School District per long established precedent described in Deletion of Sunnyhillselementary WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +5091 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/202-456-1414 User:Rackabello 22:22, 11 August 2007 (UTC) delete Wikipedia is |not 555-1212 Deletion of 202-456-1414 WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5092 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Randall (serial killer) User:Edison 21:30, 16 September 2009 (UTC) delete Wikipedia is |not a directory of every ordinary criminal. See NEWS as well. A crime or criminal gets a slash of news coverage, but is not suitable for an encyclopedia unless it has wider consequences, like new laws (such as Megan's Law or the Amber Alert), or secondary coverage like books or movies (such as In Cold Blood Deletion of James Randall (serial killer) WP:NOT||WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5093 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of common emoticons User:JzG 22:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC) delete """define """"common"""" with reference to reliabel independent sources. And then get consensus to change to include a slang or idiom guide""" Deletion of List of common emoticons WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5094 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Normal ECG User:Drchriswilliams 19:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC) merge """to :Electrocardiography as :ecg already does. As HyperGaruda observes, within this two-sentence article there isn’t particularly anything of any value to merge- even the image used on this page is from a signal generator (and there is nothing """"normal"""" about that). I can see there are currently seven separate articles on the different waveforms that appear on ecgs. Interpretation of the ecg to exclude any abnormalities isn't straightforward by any means, but I suppose redirects are |cheap""" Deletion of Normal ECG :WP:CHEAP Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap 74 +5095 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Authorities User:Paul 03:09, 2 September 2009 (UTC) delete as |CSD G12 copyright violation of the band's MySpace page description Deletion of The Authorities WP:G12 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +5096 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyPhotoAlbum User:B 01:31, 2 December 2006 (UTC) keep meets and has several third party sources. This might be the case of the messenger overshadowing the message by overselling it (pardon the pun Deletion of MyPhotoAlbum WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5097 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rewakening User:Hobbes 02:36, 27 December 2011 (UTC) delete Can't find anything substantial from an source. A bit of blog/'zine notice. It does appear to be a real album from a real band, just not sufficiently up the notability scale. If better sourcing can be found, happy to look again Deletion of Rewakening WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5098 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional television shows (2nd nomination) User:Ohconfucius 02:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC) delete The previous close was faulty and completely out of order. My guess is that it would have been overturned at DRV. I'd say that, depending on the channel, up to 95% of the fare is fictional, so this list is really quite #IINFO|pointless. And a show-in-show? |Wow! It would impart no great |encyclopaedic value. I would strongly urge for its deletion, lest we be plagued with articles such as List of television documentaries, List of reality TV shows, List of news programs, ''etc'', instead of relying on categorisation Deletion of List of fictional television shows (2nd nomination) WP:NOT||WP:SARCASM||WP:ENC Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5099 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ross Mark User:Resolute 05:39, 1 December 2008 (UTC) delete Drumheller Falcons, eh? Wow... He played for perhaps the worst team in AJHL history. That would be tier II junior, not even the highest level of ''junior hockey'', nevermind anything that would pass Deletion of Ross Mark WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5100 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luxiole User:Knowledgekid87 00:39, 14 October 2013 (UTC) delete per but mostly because of lack of reliable sources Deletion of Luxiole WP:NOTPLOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5101 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pokémon Ranger: Shadows of Almia quests User:Cabe6403 15:11, 7 April 2009 (UTC) delete blatant |game guide. Also delete per Deletion of List of Pokémon Ranger: Shadows of Almia quests WP:GAMEGUIDE||WP:SNOWBALL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5102 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/27 Club User:Edtropolis 13:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC) delete per and possibly Deletion of 27 Club WP:NEO||WP:HOAX Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +5103 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curb mining User:Colonel 17:34, 29 August 2013 (UTC) keep I recall reading that happens in Japan, where bulky items are put out for disposal. The topic(s) should be retained for reuse and recycling per , rather than being hauled off to the dump immediately Deletion of Curb mining WP:PRESERVE Wikipedia:Editing policy 24 +5104 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selçan Hatun User:TTN 21:03, 21 October 2020 (UTC) delete or redirect - Added sources seem like typical daily pop-culture dribble, so this still fails Deletion of Selçan Hatun WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5105 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Eisenkop (2nd nomination) User:Breadblade 21:04, 31 July 2014 (UTC) keep His article already clearly passes and does not apply, as he has both actively sought out public attention through venues such as https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hw2mHEMUfkI TEDx and has received significant media coverage for multiple independent events. His shadowban has only http://www.dailydot.com/news/unidan-reddit-shadowbanned-crow-ben-eisenkop/ attracted more media coverage, and http://www.reddit.com/r/blog/comments/2c63wg/how_reddit_works/cjccfyt?context=3 hasn't kept him off reddit in the first place. I will echo the sentiment that many of the articles against this article seem to come from the standpoint of Deletion of Ben Eisenkop (2nd nomination) WP:GNG||WP:NTEMP||WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5106 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bert M. Petersen User:Ukexpat 15:31, 10 September 2010 (UTC) delete per nom and OrangeMike; fails Deletion of Bert M. Petersen WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5107 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of public houses in Bracknell User:Carlossuarez46 05:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC) delete as per #DIRECTORY as above by Deletion of List of public houses in Bracknell WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5108 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bon McDougall User:Ultraexactzz 14:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC) keep as competing in a professional race at the highest level would indicate some notability, per . If the Indy 500 was it, though, then maybe it is a little too soon for an article Deletion of Bon McDougall WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5109 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Paulin User:Cameron11598 03:42, 4 November 2016 (UTC) delete Fails , and ACTOR Deletion of Scott Paulin WP:N||WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5110 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Cawthorne Haines User:JhonsJoe 22:38, 3 September 2014 (UTC) keep He meets . also, the article (created by me) Steven Joel Sotloff was made before he was killed. David Haines is all over the news and is a hostage of ISIS. This is part of an ongoing situation, we should keep this by all costs. Like James Foley, and Steven Sotloff, people want to hear about this guy Deletion of David Cawthorne Haines WP:NOTABILITY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5111 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carroll High School (Fort Wayne, Indiana) User:Stifle 00:15, 12 April 2006 (UTC) keep per Deletion of Carroll High School (Fort Wayne, Indiana) WP:SCH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5112 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominik Bartmanski User:Bakazaka 18:00, 5 November 2018 (UTC) delete as the scholarly impact is relatively normal, no significantly influential idea or theory, no post as named chair or journal editor, no significant award, does not seem to be a widely-cited expert in the media, etc, so does not pass . Note also that higher number of citations is in work with multiple authors (which is not uncommon, but also weighs against individual impact). Perfectly adequate academic, maybe a more influential career ahead, but not notable enough for Wikipedia now Deletion of Dominik Bartmanski WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5113 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of U.S. and Canadian cities by professional sports teams championships User:Deor 01:49, 13 June 2008 (UTC) delete Perhaps not original research; but the nom is correct that this is a fundamentally flawed list of ''cities'' by number of championships, since it apportions championships by ''teams'' rather than by cities (Atlanta, for example, has no NBA championships; the Hawks were in St. Louis when they were champions). I also agree with Shereth (I think) that this list is based on a loose association of topics (though I don't think that is covered in Deletion of List of U.S. and Canadian cities by professional sports teams championships WP:LIST Wikipedia:Lists 36 +5114 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Pharaoh Francis User:Xxanthippe 22:57, 4 June 2016 (UTC) delete for reative at present. We need multiple independent in-depth reviews to establish notability Deletion of Diana Pharaoh Francis WP:C Wikipedia:Copyrights 60 +5115 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KBIT FM User:Avraham 04:50, 9 July 2006 (UTC) delete Unfortunately, Hoax is NOT a speedy criterion, neither is . Please see #Non-criteria, but as it doesn't exist here http://www.officialusa.com/stateguides/media/radiostations/california.html it should be tossed with extreme prejiduce Deletion of KBIT FM WP:OR||WP:CSD Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5116 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Addis Sheraton Shopping Center User:Technical 15:50, 5 September 2013 (UTC) delete as this does in fact fail Deletion of Addis Sheraton Shopping Center WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5117 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kulturmax Multimedia [[User talk:Satori Son|Satori Son]] 05:04, 16 September 2006 (UTC) delete Does not meet any of the three criteria for notability listed in . Insufficient sources per , and reads like Deletion of Kulturmax Multimedia WP:CORP||WP:V||WP:ADVERT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5118 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/June Swann User:Davey2010 01:11, 10 September 2015 (UTC) keep per MKDW - |Before nominating any article editors ''are'' expected to search for sources which judging by this AFD the nominator clearly hasn't done that!, Anyway article's been expanded and judging by MKDW's findings i'd say notability's certainly there Deletion of June Swann WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +5119 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhythm Activism User:Bearcat 18:20, 3 November 2013 (UTC) keep per sourcing improvements. What happened here is that this article was created a long time ago, when Wikipedia's sourcing requirements weren't nearly as strict as they are now, and it just never got added to as the rules tightened up. Although ''some'' of the newly added references are actually |primary sources and should still be upgraded to the better kind, enough of them (''Voir'', Library and Archives Canada, etc.) are valid to demonstrate that they do indeed meet criteria Deletion of Rhythm Activism WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:BAND Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5120 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Frank User:MCB 21:16, 26 August 2007 (UTC) keep """I am somewhat puzzled by the existence of this AfD, and some of the """"delete"""" votes and comments. I tend to have a resaonably high bar for notability, but this person clearly meets without much serious argument, both from the article and its sources, and from a cursory examination of media mentions and authorship of widely-read material. While I assume good faith in the nomination, I suspect that a lot of the deletion arguments are based on Wikipedia politics, and that has no place here at all""" Deletion of Ted Frank WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5121 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dilip Sapkota User:GPL93 17:31, 24 March 2020 (UTC) delete clear fail. Best Deletion of Dilip Sapkota WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5122 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Youth Arts Collective User:Brewcrewer 06:31, 23 February 2008 (UTC) delete per nom, (barely not a speedy Deletion of Youth Arts Collective WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5123 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bacolod Evangelical Church User:TimothyBlue 19:45, 2 August 2020 (UTC) delete WP:BEFORE shows only coverage, does not meet ''addresses the topic directly and in detail''.   //  Deletion of Bacolod Evangelical Church WP:ROUTINE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5124 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Your Own Decay User:Jayden54 22:21, 19 December 2006 (UTC) delete fails : no coverage by reliable sources, no internation tours or awards, and their albums aren't available on amazon, which means they can't be very notable Deletion of Your Own Decay WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5125 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judwaa 2 NONE NONE delete According to our |notability guideline for films Deletion of Judwaa 2 WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5126 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Peacock User:Hydronium 14:41, 13 March 2016 (UTC) keep MOS:DABRL also applies. This is probably a against criterion 1 given you don't appear to actually want the page deleted at this point, just edited down (?). The Devil's Dust line should be deleted since it's just a fictionalised/dramatised version of the real person (I've added a bit of crosslinking to the DD and KC articles Deletion of Matt Peacock WP:SPEEDYKEEP Wikipedia:Speedy keep 86 +5127 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyberathlete Amateur League (2nd nomination) User:Randomran 19:31, 28 September 2008 (UTC) delete no reliable third-party sources to support this article, thus failing and . Only sources are either self-published unreliable sources, or official material that has been reprinted such as press releases Deletion of Cyberathlete Amateur League (2nd nomination) WP:N||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5128 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regions of sydney User:WWGB 12:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC) delete """Unreferenced, """"blue ribbon suburbs"""" appears to be """ Deletion of Regions of sydney WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5129 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taharrush gamea User:E 15:51, 13 January 2016 (UTC) keep although I would prefer an English name for this phenomenon. The fact is tha tcoverage of this is now massive http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/12/world/europe/swedish-police-coverup-sexual-assault.html and multiple incidents http://www.dw.com/en/swedish-police-accused-of-covering-up-festival-sex-assault/a-18972345 have been revealed, some are enumerated in the Cologne article. As a topic, it passes Deletion of Taharrush gamea WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5130 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minim football teams of the University of Notre Dame User:Paulmcdonald 14:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC) keep """There's nothing that discounts coverage for being """"local"""" only that the coverage must be """"significant"""" -- this topic seems to be a worthy inclusion for its historical value and coverage details. That we don't have a lot of online sources available for this time frame is no shock to me, and I believe that including this article does make Wikipedia better. It appears to be a worthy exception to the practice of not having articles for sports at this level""" Deletion of Minim football teams of the University of Notre Dame WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5131 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drane Scrivener User:Wjemather 14:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC) delete lack of overrides any trivial pass of any part of . We can keep his name in a list, if a suitable one exists Deletion of Drane Scrivener WP:SIGCOV||WP:NSPORT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5132 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daytonnati User:Kieran207 23:54, 23 April 2021 (UTC) delete My BEFORE search came up with this article, a few Wikipedia mirrors, a Reddit post, a DGuide entry, the 1998 newspaper article cited here (and a similar one published one week later by the same paper), and another website that's just a copy and paste of this article. Also fails .-- Deletion of Daytonnati WP:NEO||WP:WPTC Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +5133 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Occupation symbols User:Colonel 11:53, 26 December 2009 (UTC) keep The matter is highly notable and I had no difficulty finding a recent news source which comments extensively upon this topic following the recent passage of another law about this matter in Poland. The claims of synthesis seem weak and have not been raised as an issue at the article's talk page. Failure to resolve such issues at the article before bringing the matter here is contrary to our |deletion policy Deletion of Occupation symbols WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +5134 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Matter User:Esradekan 21:31, 3 June 2008 (UTC) delete article fails to establish notability as per Deletion of DJ Matter WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5135 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sosumi User:Green 18:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC) keep """I expanded the article. Per , the """"topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject"""". Two books, four newspapers (there are more in NewsBank), a couple reliable websites. One source called it a """"classic sound"""". It has influenced other works, including appearing in a major film""" Deletion of Sosumi WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5136 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khaleel Mohammed User:Samir_ 19:07, 25 December 2006 (UTC) delete fails . No mention in the article of why this particular academic is notable in his field. If such is added to the article, and referenced, then I change my !vote Deletion of Khaleel Mohammed WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5137 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AAPLAC NONE NONE keep If I read , correctly , the first line reads, ''Organizations are usually notable if the scope of activities are national or international in scale''. It fails in not having a verifiable third party citation which should be easy to find. Here's one that a bullet about the 14th annual conference held in 2003 in San Antonio, TX coming from the University of Conn., http://clacs.uconn.edu/ariel/online/conferences.html ''Center for Latin American and Caribbean Studies''. No affliation either location. Recommend cleanup, wikify, etal Deletion of AAPLAC WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5138 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heavy metal fashion User:Wisdom89 23:06, 10 March 2008 (UTC) keep Requires citations, but is definitely culturally relevant. Also, is not a reason to delete. It's a reason to improve Deletion of Heavy metal fashion WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +5139 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John James (American politician) User:Bearcat 02:37, 5 April 2018 (UTC) delete People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates in elections they haven't won yet — if you cannot demonstrate and |reliably source that he was ''already'' notable enough for an article for some other reason ''before'' becoming a candidate, then he has to ''win'' the election, not just run in it, to become notable as a politician. As usual, no prejudice against recreation in November if he wins the seat — but nothing stated or sourced here has demonstrated that he's already eligible to have an article today Deletion of John James (American politician) WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5140 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Byron User:Djsasso 03:19, 3 July 2009 (UTC) delete Non-notable amateur player who has yet to play professionally so fails to meet or . Also fails 's guidelines for player notablity /PPF#NOTE. Can be recreated when/if he plays professionally or otherwise achieves notability Deletion of Paul Byron WP:ATHLETE||WP:N||WP:HOCKEY||WP:HOCKEY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5141 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerome C. Glenn User:David 23:01, 3 May 2014 (UTC) delete The ''State of the Future'' reports have reasonably high citation counts on Google scholar, but I think any notability there goes to the Millenium Project rather than him personally. And there seems to be nothing else of note; in particular I don't see the evidence for nor Deletion of Jerome C. Glenn WP:PROF||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5142 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farooky Tooth Powder User:NewYorkActuary 02:57, 21 May 2017 (UTC) delete The article's sole source appears to be a dead link (at least, I couldn't find the article in the newspaper archive that the link sent me to). But the official website is interesting -- this tooth powder is also advertised to relieve or cure a variety of non-tooth ailments, including dysentery, cholera and swine flu. I think this article has serious problems under Deletion of Farooky Tooth Powder WP:MEDRS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5143 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ponte dei Bareteri User:Matthiaspaul 16:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC) keep """It is obvious that this stub needs expansion, but I see our basic notability criteria per fulfilled. There are articles in several other Wikipedias, Google turns up with lots of hits, and it is covered in several books. One of them lists is as """"bridge 26"""" of 100 Venecian bridges (http://venice100bridges.blogspot.de/2014/05/bridge-twenty-six-ponte-dei-bareteri.html). Venipedia has a detailed description of it as well (http://www.venipedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=Ponte_dei_Bareteri). With enough time at hands, I'm sure more in-deep sources can be turned up as well, so I think the article has potential to grow""" Deletion of Ponte dei Bareteri WP:NGEO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5144 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafiqul Islam Masum User:CAPTAIN 21:42, 16 August 2017 (UTC) delete non-notable Deletion of Rafiqul Islam Masum WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5145 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PJ Liguori User:Atlantic306 01:41, 31 March 2016 (UTC) keep in view of the reliable sources above, particularly the Deadline Hollywood article, passes Deletion of PJ Liguori WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5146 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capital City Green User:Jeni 08:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC) keep Easily meets the Deletion of Capital City Green WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5147 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Atheist Experience (2nd nomination) [[User talk:202.124.72.77|talk]]) 00:47, 2 June 2012 (UTC) delete The only about the show I can find is the local coverage in the ''Austin American-Statesman'' and ''The Austin Chronicle'' noted above, which isn't enough for . -- Special:Contributions/202.124.72.77|202.124.72.77 Deletion of The Atheist Experience (2nd nomination) WP:RS||WP:N Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5148 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of wars involving Nepal User:Mkdw 17:55, 15 January 2017 (UTC) keep WP:LISTCRUFT is an essay -- not a policy based argument for deletion. The topic is likely widely covered and cited by other encyclopedias and meets our criteria for Deletion of List of wars involving Nepal WP:LISTN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5149 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monika de Habsburgo-Lorena User:Surtsicna 13:18, 30 May 2020 (UTC) delete I am not able to find any significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources that would satisfy . The notable member of her family appears to be her son. She is only ever mentioned in passing and in genealogy publications but |Wikipedia is not meant for genealogical entries Deletion of Monika de Habsburgo-Lorena WP:BASIC||WP:NOTGENEALOGY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5150 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Heartfield user:Hannes 16:14, 12 August 2021 (UTC) keep with a number of reviews including https://www.jstor.org/stable/41999451 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/victorianstudies.56.3.522 https://www.jstor.org/stable/24047001 and the ones found by {{ping|Elemimele}} he passes . {{ping|Maud.Clowd}} Generally academic reviews are counted towards notability per . I would fail to see how reviews in academic journals are less important than other reviews, I would rather suggest that they are held to a higher standard and assess scholarly contribution. In general as long as the venue in which the review appears is reliable, we can use it -- there are many niche genres outside academia where authors become notable by being reviewed in a specialized journal (eg science fiction etc). Given that multiple books of his have multiple reviews, this also means doesnt apply here but this shows a consistent streak of recognized scholarship Deletion of James Heartfield WP:NAUTHOR||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5151 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Wells (politician) User:Cullen328 23:04, 5 April 2011 (UTC) delete As an unsuccessful candidate, he fails and no other claim to notability is made Deletion of Robert Wells (politician) WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5152 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WHOOP-Szo User:Atlantic306 00:22, 10 July 2020 (UTC) keep as the article subject now clearly passes bith and , imv Deletion of WHOOP-Szo WP:GNG||WP:NMUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5153 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul R. Fleischman User:Bearian 13:35, 8 August 2017 (UTC) delete the award he got was minor, and none of the other information is |verifiable Deletion of Paul R. Fleischman WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5154 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collin O'Mara User:scope_creep 10:40, 9 February 2019 (UTC) delete Fail . Barely any mention of him outside social media or the places he works at, hence the reason the article has no references Deletion of Collin O'Mara WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5155 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajesh Kumawat User:Bearian 15:15, 30 October 2019 (UTC) delete one of |thousands of local party officials and candidates Deletion of Rajesh Kumawat WP:MILL Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill 32 +5156 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flowers upon the Grave User:Joe 19:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC) delete I can't find significant coverage for this |demo Deletion of Flowers upon the Grave WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5157 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinod Jose [[User talk:210.7.71.114|talk]]) 09:47, 21 May 2013 (UTC) delete """Seems at present the claim to notability rests on awards. Which aren't really that. Since one is a single """"honourable mention"""" among many and one is a scholarship. The only remaining thing, therefore, is one award from the Asia Society of New york. In any case, and most importantly, a random award is explicitly not part of . There are dozens of journalism prizes out there, and that's why it isn't considered notable if you win one unless the prize itself is notable, like the Pulitzer. The """"secondary"""" sources mentioned discuss individual stories and consist mainly of blog roundups of notable stories of that period. So that isn't useful either. Essentially, it is difficult to find any journalist of any experience who has written one or two stories about which an analogous article could not be written. Which is why this needs to be deleted. Special:Contributions/210.7.71.114|210.7.71.114""" Deletion of Vinod Jose WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5158 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Massey User:Morenooso 23:05, 3 May 2010 (UTC) keep The search, ''Laura Massey+xbox'' gets ghits but nothing that would most likely be considered . I have a feeling that in the gaming community, she would be fairly notable Deletion of Laura Massey WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5159 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warren Baker User:MichaelQSchmidt 09:27, 21 December 2009 (UTC) delete Wow. Here's an individual who appears to meet , but his name is so common that it is nigh on impossible to find sources Deletion of Warren Baker WP:ENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5160 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CodebaseHQ User:Joe 22:36, 21 August 2009 (UTC) delete I can't find |significant coverage for this software Deletion of CodebaseHQ WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5161 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Force of Reason User:AllyD 17:29, 30 July 2011 (UTC) comment """Like """"The book was a bestseller in Europe"""" for example? Fair enough, it isn't cited but as per you could try that Google Books thingy (best combining author name with book title) to see various published discussions of this very book""" Deletion of The Force of Reason :WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +5162 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Money (2016 film) User:Nagle 18:32, 21 September 2015 (UTC) delete """It's in production, and not a major film. Not notable yet. Can't find the movie (even searching for """"Martin Rosete"""") in The Hollywood Reporter. applies""" Deletion of Money (2016 film) WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5163 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominic Aquila User:Aecis 23:02, 11 October 2006 (UTC) delete Doesn't pass either or . Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Aecis|A Deletion of Dominic Aquila WP:PROF||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5164 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duchamp (clothing) User:Northamerica1000 09:59, 22 October 2013 (UTC) keep Meets . Source examples include: http://www.scotsman.com/lifestyle/fashion/fashion-the-scottish-force-behind-duchamp-1-3105691, http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/style/articles/2013-01/07/duchamp-london-collections-men, http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-20216775.html Deletion of Duchamp (clothing) WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5165 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Envy of the State User:Lankiveil 12:04, 15 June 2014 (UTC) delete if the bit about headlining international tours was true, then they'd meet #4. However, the reference provided doesn't support the claim, and I have not been able to find anything online whatsoever to indicate they've played outside of the UK, which leads me to believe the claim is bollocks. I think there may be some puffery, exaggeration, and outright lies going into this article Deletion of Envy of the State WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5166 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Binayak Giri User:Spike 11:52, 18 May 2018 (UTC) delete Fails , having not played any 1st class, list A nor T20 games or any national games at a suitable level. Does not pass for me. I can't find a page for them on cricinfo Deletion of Binayak Giri WP:NCRIC||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5167 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reactions to the July 2016 Kabul bombing User:Nannadeem 12:45, 28 July 2016 (UTC) comment """WP:GNG says: If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list. also prescribes that """"notability not temporary"""". Per First (perhaps the only) keep vote the page should be dealt with . I think this is rule position, but I have seen the fate of page Reactions to the 2016 Nice attack + https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Reactions_to_the_2016_Nice_attack/ (1); more importantly the page view statistics and international reactions with huge difference itself speak for humanitarianism and dual standard for terrorism. So with this academic background I stand neutral at this PROD""" Deletion of Reactions to the July 2016 Kabul bombing WP:NTEMP||WP:DUE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5168 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twingo snooker User:Batard0 12:13, 25 October 2012 (UTC) delete It's funny. But . Not a single reference on google books, google news or google. Indicates it may be . Misses all notability guidelines by a long way Deletion of Twingo snooker WP:ITSFUNNY||WP:MADEUP Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +5169 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Onses User:Bearcat 14:01, 7 February 2021 (UTC) delete """Nothing stated in the article is """"inherently"""" notable enough to exempt him from actually having to clear on his sources: businesspeople are not automatically notable just because they exist, writers are not automatically notable just because their writing technically metaverifies its own existence, unsuccessful political candidates are not automatically notable just because it's possible to verify their vote totals, and on and so forth. The article is not well-sourced, and nothing stated in the article body hands him an automatic notability freebie in the absence of much better sourcing than this""" Deletion of Richard Onses WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5170 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hum Hai Teen Khurafaati User:Mr 00:20, 26 March 2018 (UTC) delete I could only find passing by mentions, nothing that indicates significance or meets Deletion of Hum Hai Teen Khurafaati WP:NFILM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5171 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dance of Death (novel) User:Kafziel 00:15, 22 October 2010 (UTC) keep Does appear to meet based on the reviews added by Edgepedia. I could see it being merged along with all the others into a larger article about the Pendergast series. (I'd be happy to put that together, if that's the consensus.) But I do think it is fine as a separate article as well Deletion of Dance of Death (novel) WP:BK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5172 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristian Guerrero User:Kinston 00:55, 10 September 2007 (UTC) keep As noted above, this player meets the current standard for athletes in , and it should be noted that he also meets the proposed standards in Wikipedia:Notability (sports) by playing for the AAA Columbus and New Orleans teams. Requests have been made that baseball player AfD's be put on hold until the proposed guidelines are worked out Deletion of Cristian Guerrero WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5173 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Koltz User:MelanieN 14:04, 16 August 2010 (UTC) delete """This writer's claim to fame is that he ghost-wrote a couple of books by General Zinni (not quite ghost-wrote, since he is credited as co-writer) and that he wrote two of the """"Choose Your Own Adventure"""" books. Not even close to meeting """ Deletion of Tony Koltz WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5174 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scary Movie 5 (2nd nomination) [[User talk:Erpert|(let's talk about it)]] 07:18, 17 November 2010 (UTC) delete There ''is'' an http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0795461/ IMDb entry but it doesn't even have so much of a cast listing; thus, it's |too soon for this article. '''Erpert Deletion of Scary Movie 5 (2nd nomination) WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +5175 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathew Knowles User:Fæ 10:39, 6 July 2012 (UTC) keep sufficient for the otability#General notability guideline|General notability guideline Deletion of Mathew Knowles WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5176 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanguinary User:wknight94 03:56, 31 January 2006 (UTC) delete Non-notable band per . Released only one full-length album - suggests two full length albums on major labels. No mentions on Amazon or AllMusic. Discography present so I didn't speedy Deletion of Sanguinary WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5177 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominic McDowall-Thomas User:timtempleton 00:13, 23 August 2018 (UTC) delete co-founded the second incarnation of a single company that is just barely notable itself, and doesn't have much media coverage. Anyone else notice that the first two sentences say he's known for two different unrelated things? Fails Deletion of Dominic McDowall-Thomas WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5178 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keser User:DMacks 13:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC) keep as meeting , though major rewrite needed...the article feels like PR, mainly because large parts of it are written as a list of bullet points aimed at satisfying the requirements Deletion of Keser WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5179 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amin Affane User:Mattythewhite 16:10, 14 March 2012 (UTC) delete Fail and Deletion of Amin Affane WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5180 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry hoknes User:Excirial 10:44, 23 October 2009 (UTC) delete """I agree with the assessment. A search on both the article name, as well as on the related band """"Orange Lucy"""" returns nothing but myspace, youtube and similar websites which do not count as |reliable sources. Furthermore the article is full of claims they inspired other bands (), includes a lot of red links to apparently not notable artists, and the few names that do yield a link are either wrongly linked, or not related to the notability of the subject""" Deletion of Terry hoknes WP:RS||WP:OPINION Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5181 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Hoskins Paddock User:Kintetsubuffalo 10:07, 3 October 2017 (UTC) keep if we're going to have weepers about anyone executed in the United States, as is the rage now, then FBI most wanted listers are more clearly notable and meet and Deletion of Benjamin Hoskins Paddock WP:CRIMINAL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5182 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming (3rd nomination) User:Oren0 00:48, 26 October 2009 (UTC) keep I do believe that this article has POV and OR issues, but I don't believe that those issues are inherent in the subject matter; they can be fixed. I don't see why this page is any more or than any number of lists of controversial subject matter, as noted above. Overall, I find the deletion arguments to be unconvincing and I don't see what has changed since the previous AfDs Deletion of List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming (3rd nomination) WP:POV||WP:UNDUE Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +5183 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agent 3S3: Passport to Hell User:Cavarrone 12:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC) keep The film has a strong and not-trivial coverage in http://www.google.it/search?tbm=bks&tbo=1&hl=it&q=%22Agente+3S3%3A+Passaporto+per+l%27inferno%22&btnG=Cerca+nei+libri#q=%22Agente+3S3:+Passaporto+per+l%27inferno%22&hl=it&safe=off&tbo=1&tbm=bks&ei=9RQUT9i-Gojk4QTP5qHrAw&start=0&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=78622060eb4a341b&biw=939&bih=358 Google Books, including books like ''L'Avventurosa storia del cinema italiano raccontata dai suoi protagonisti, 1960-1969'', ''007 All'Italiana'', ''Mondo exotica: sounds, visions, obsessions of the cocktail generation'', ''Dizionario dei film italiani stracult'', ''Spionaggio, avventura, eroi moderni''. The nom lacks of Deletion of Agent 3S3: Passport to Hell WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +5184 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Straight marriage User:Penelope 03:25, 1 July 2006 (UTC) delete and DO NOT REDIRECT. Redirection would encourage people to do this sort of thing for the sake of Deletion of Straight marriage WP:POINT Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +5185 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Az Zawiyah User:Abductive 18:46, 26 February 2011 (UTC) comment Are there sources on this that pass and ? Because even if the event is notable, if none of the information can be verified, the page must be deleted Deletion of Battle of Az Zawiyah WP:V||WP:RS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5186 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guardians of Ga'Hoole Book 11: To Be a King User:Reyk 02:16, 8 July 2010 (UTC) delete I agree that this fails in general and in particular Deletion of Guardians of Ga'Hoole Book 11: To Be a King WP:GNG||WP:NB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5187 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICharts [[User talk:Hirsutism|talk]]) 20:57, 4 July 2017 (UTC) delete per nom. The only independent source is the one from CNET, and that's not sufficient for . --Special:Contributions/Hirsutism|Hirsutism Deletion of ICharts WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5188 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries by Upul Tharanga User:Ajf773 23:11, 18 November 2018 (UTC) delete per /. Content is easily sourced on ESPNCricinfo. Also the 25 requirement isn't a policy, it's a seemingly invented guideline created by Wikiproject Cricket Deletion of List of international cricket centuries by Upul Tharanga WP:NOTSTATS||WP:NOTMIRROR Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5189 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bidyut Khan (2nd nomination) User:Katarighe 01:08, 28 November 2011 (UTC) delete Huge concerns Deletion of Bidyut Khan (2nd nomination) WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +5190 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deji (YouTuber) User:Bearian 00:56, 22 April 2020 (UTC) keep he has 8 million subscribers, but the coverage is decidedly weak considering his popularity. Maybe Deletion of Deji (YouTuber) WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +5191 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyline Marina User:Kalivd 14:38, 5 September 2008 (UTC) delete as per nom Deletion of Skyline Marina WP:NOTABILITY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5192 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agniputra (Nepali film) User:SL93 01:04, 31 December 2018 (UTC) delete I couldn't find any significant coverage per Deletion of Agniputra (Nepali film) WP:NF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5193 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/True20 User:MrFish 02:19, 13 April 2008 (UTC) keep per Deletion of True20 WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5194 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SFS Homes User:onel5969 13:15, 14 March 2016 (UTC) delete not enough independent coverage in reliable, independent sources to show they pass either or Deletion of SFS Homes WP:GNG||WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5195 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sun Water Systems User:Ayub407 17:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC) delete Not at all notable. Fails and Deletion of Sun Water Systems WP:GNG||WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5196 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fully sick User:Insanephantom 12:26, 9 January 2007 (UTC) delete per some above comments as |neologism. Or maybe put in Wiktionary Deletion of Fully sick WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +5197 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maygas User:AllyD 06:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC) delete An unsourced article making no claim to notability, even self-deprecating in tone. Nothing here to meet or , not even enough in my opinion to exceed a CSD A7 Deletion of Maygas :WP:CORPDEPTH||:WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5198 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anil Nair User:Legis 05:03, 11 December 2011 (UTC) delete Seems to me to be a clear case of failing Deletion of Anil Nair WP:ACADEMIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5199 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica May User:Dihydrogen 02:32, 13 March 2008 (UTC) keep """per - """"''Has won or been a serious nominee for a well-known award''"""" - Ninfa Prize per article (sourced, too""" Deletion of Jessica May WP:PORNBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5200 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of windmills in Guernsey User:Mjroots 17:58, 8 March 2021 (UTC) keep It's a sub-list of the List of windmills, per . Of the mills in the Bailiwick of Guernsey, Vale Mill and Sark Windmill may just be notable enough to sustain articles, but it would be hard work getting either above start class. The subject is notable enough to sustain a list, per Deletion of List of windmills in Guernsey WP:LSC||WP:LISTN Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists 51 +5201 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 331 User:Satori 12:38, 31 March 2010 (UTC) delete as insufficiently notable per the . There is no evidence this specific bus route has been the subject of non-trivial coverage by multiple, independent, reliable sources. As such, it is not possible to write an article which meets the non-negotiable requirements of and Deletion of London Buses route 331 WP:GNG||WP:V||WP:NOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5202 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stelios Coucounaras User:Ben 09:17, 13 June 2015 (UTC) delete Have searched for German sources (one states that he has been living there for fifty years).http://www.komponistenlexikon.de/content/komponisten.php?id=249 There are only a few mentions, mostly for his composing for brass, esp. tubas. Seems to be liked by advanced instrumentalists.http://www.nmz.de/artikel/virtuose-tuba-im-konzertsaal But that is not enough for Deletion of Stelios Coucounaras WP:COMPOSER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5203 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ACF Car Finance User:Themfromspace 19:52, 27 January 2012 (UTC) delete I also can't find significant coverage of this subject in reliable sources, to meet our |general notability guideline Deletion of ACF Car Finance WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5204 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jahres-Bericht über die Fortschritte der chemischen Technologie für Fabrikanten, Chemiker, Pharmaceuten, Hütten- und Forstleute und Cameralisten User:David 20:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC) keep I found and added two brief reviews of this journal in another journal (both in the same other journal). They're not independent of each other, so the case for is weak, but I think that and the other in-passing references already in the article might barely be enough Deletion of Jahres-Bericht über die Fortschritte der chemischen Technologie für Fabrikanten, Chemiker, Pharmaceuten, Hütten- und Forstleute und Cameralisten WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5205 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Sylvia User:Moonraker 07:22, 9 November 2020 (UTC) keep Poor article but still seems to meet , as at least one source is “substantial coverage”, viz. an article about Sylvia and not a brief mention Deletion of Nathan Sylvia WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5206 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Schlong User:Bucketsofg 15:00, 5 May 2006 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Dr Schlong WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5207 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silver Bell User:SummerPhD 17:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC) delete Non-notable unreleased album. Fails Deletion of Silver Bell WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5208 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Smell User:TydeNet 04:34, 10 April 2006 (UTC) delete per nomination. See ; this is highly POV and reads like an advertisement. Has no place in an encyclopedia, and if it does, requires desperate re-write Deletion of The Smell WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5209 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Osimhen User:GiantSnowman 07:18, 20 June 2016 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Victor Osimhen WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5210 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Same-sex marriage and procreation User:Verdatum 17:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC) delete I fail to see why information on this topic cannot be in Same-sex marriage; it does not follow , nor is it even linked to by the obvious parent article. appears to be an essay and I can't think of any way to fix it Deletion of Same-sex marriage and procreation WP:SUMMARY Wikipedia:Summary style 23 +5211 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shivani kapoor User:Evb 16:44, 25 August 2007 (UTC) delete """per nom. I tagged it for speedy, which was denied based on the award won. I also searched for and added one reference. None of the sources I came across was hugely reliable, and her """"accomplishments"""" are not that great, . . . yet? Fails in my book""" Deletion of Shivani kapoor WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5212 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mystic Travelogues User:Tokyogirl79 10:20, 16 January 2013 (UTC) delete I remember endorsing the PROD, not realizing that it was a second attempt at PRODing the same article. I did a quick search to see if any new sources had been put out since I endorsed the PROD and sure enough, there aren't any that would show it passes . This just isn't notable at this point in time Deletion of The Mystic Travelogues WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5213 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christophe Aubanel User:Govvy 09:35, 15 April 2019 (UTC) keep Easily passes there are sources out there, has played way enough professional football to qualify for an article regardless of its poor quality. Also the nominator should of had a look at the French wikipedia page and would of seen the difference to know this player passes the guideline instead of wasting peoples time with this AfD Deletion of Christophe Aubanel WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5214 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scooby-Doo and the Goblin King User:Ecoleetage 04:22, 14 July 2008 (UTC) keep The film exists - it will be available shortly, so does not apply Deletion of Scooby-Doo and the Goblin King WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5215 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joaquín Carbonell User:GiantSnowman 17:19, 27 May 2013 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Joaquín Carbonell WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5216 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krestianstvo SDK User:OSborn 21:18, 10 March 2011 (UTC) comment Yes. (Although the time when Sputnik was covered is not important). If nobody anywhere documented or covered Sputnik 1, we wouldn't care. Wikipedia articles do not have to be completed based off of news reports- academic journals, etc are all fine sources and can establish notability, but the sources ''must meet the |reliable source policies.'' No such coverage exists for this piece of software- its existence alone does not grant it inclusion in Wikipedia Deletion of Krestianstvo SDK WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5217 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eva Natus-Šalamounová User:Possibly 18:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC) keep I am seeing many mentions in Czech, and there is the museum collection, so GNG is likely met. Seeing as the nominator does not seem to do and has made two incorrect AfD nominations of notable artists today, I don't put much faith in this nomination Deletion of Eva Natus-Šalamounová WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +5218 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shwe Eain Min User:Devonian 12:29, 17 January 2021 (UTC) delete total failure of , the only sources I could find that even mentioned her were social media and a couple of directory listings Deletion of Shwe Eain Min WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5219 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stratified multi criteria decision making User:Coolabahapple 12:52, 27 July 2018 (UTC) delete """a case of (with ), in addition to , what is telling is """"not the first proposal of my method, namely stratified multi criteria decision making method."""" from the article creator 1st response above""" Deletion of Stratified multi criteria decision making WP:OR||WP:COI||WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5220 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham Lubelski (3rd nomination) User:KidAd 22:25, 17 May 2020 (UTC) delete per nom. The article is blatant , and was partially written by Lubelski himself Deletion of Abraham Lubelski (3rd nomination) WP:PROMO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5221 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iman Farzin User:John 13:10, 1 November 2020 (UTC) keep Although no significant English sources, the fa references show . Whilst the article needs some work, that shouldn't be a consideration for deletion. Agree with {{u|Mjroots}}, what happens on fa-wiki should not spill over here Deletion of Iman Farzin WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5222 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Glenn Hinson User:BabbaQ 20:20, 21 April 2012 (UTC) keep per and Deletion of Kenneth Glenn Hinson WP:GNG||WP:CRIME Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5223 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maya Hills User:MichaelQSchmidt 21:23, 30 December 2010 (UTC) delete per . Only entered her career field recently, and while receiving award nominations, they are both in a single year Deletion of Maya Hills WP:TOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +5224 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tests on rollers User:MSJapan 01:24, 20 June 2016 (UTC) delete This is sourced to whatever some random auto club decides they're going to do on YouTube with whatever car they can get their hands on at the time. for sure. This isn't based on |reliable sources; it needs manufacturer's data, not some random silliness in a parking lot Deletion of Tests on rollers WP:CRUFT||WP:RS Wikipedia:Fancruft 61 +5225 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Barnes (Left Behind) User:Bearian 14:51, 9 September 2014 (UTC) merge as suggested, and per |the usual procedure when the notability of a fictional character is not clear Deletion of Bruce Barnes (Left Behind) WP:OUTCOMES Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +5226 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burn This City User:Adolphus79 18:17, 5 October 2009 (UTC) comment """I'm sorry, you're right, the """"physical version"""" has not been released yet... """"future"""" has been removed from my rational... as far as your comments on the band's notability, I share your thoughts... I prodded all their singles and demo albums because there was no signs of them passing /, but two of the album articles claim they have made it onto some national chart, which passes ... each of the member's articles have also been removed because they did not pass ... The band's article, and 2 of the albums are about all I can find that even come close to passing notability concerns, but I have not done any heavy research to confirm the claims of the articles... If you do decide to do said research and take the band (or the 2 albums that claim to have charted) itself to AfD, please leave me a note... The creator/primary editor of a lot of these articles ({{User|Simonpettersen}}) has a pretty long history of creating articles for non-notable bands and their albums, and uploading images without any licensing information... As much as I hate to do it, I had to pretty much go back through his entire contribution history and tag most of it for deletion after I came across Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanity Shed|this... I am still |AGF'ng this user, and am trying to help him better understand policy (zero replies to anything written on his talk page), but for now am keeping a close eye on his contributions""" Deletion of Burn This City WP:NALBUMS||WP:NSONGS||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:AGF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5227 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammadreza Khalilighazi User:RadioFan 19:27, 30 March 2010 (UTC) delete """autobiography, fails lacks coverage in 3rd party sources. This same editor has created another article on a computer science """"method"""" he """"created""" Deletion of Mohammadreza Khalilighazi WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5228 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States election audits and electoral fraud User:Mus 13:58, 5 April 2007 (UTC) delete This is entirely . The point of the article seems to be to articulate that machine politics leads to election fraud, and there are no sources backing that up Deletion of United States election audits and electoral fraud WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5229 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monastery of St. Michael, Zadar User:Bluerasberry 16:30, 26 December 2015 (UTC) comment Strange - I would have expected to apply, but for some reason, the rules say that untranslated content in English Wikipedia is deleted if the content exists on another Wikipedia, but kept if it does not exist in another version and needs translation. I would have expected CSD in both cases and not sure how this policy works. I would favor deleting this content because English Wikipedia is for English language and this content seems out of scope to me Deletion of Monastery of St. Michael, Zadar WP:CSD||WP:A2 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +5230 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevvu Keka User:MichaelQSchmidt 07:08, 14 September 2012 (UTC) delete """per . While ''some'' coverage of its """"launch"""" (essentially an announcement party) and pre-production is availble,http://www.indiaglitz.com/channels/telugu/article/81467.htmlhttp://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-07-25/news-interviews/32847420_1_allari-naresh-kevvu-keka-anrhttp://www.supergoodmovies.com/43189/tollywood/gabbar-singh-songs-rocking-tollywood-news-details tells us we wait until we have more before we have an article""" Deletion of Kevvu Keka WP:NYF||WP:NFF Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +5231 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little London (band) User:Nuttah 20:04, 30 May 2010 (UTC) delete Nowhere near meeting Deletion of Little London (band) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5232 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Ryan Ruiz User:Kostas20142 10:36, 20 April 2017 (UTC) delete as it fails both and Deletion of Michael Ryan Ruiz WP:GNG||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5233 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of American politicians convicted of crimes User:The 20:30, 26 November 2010 (UTC) delete per nom. Plus another kind of subject. Politicans commit crimes, whoda thunk Deletion of List of American politicians convicted of crimes WP:DOGBITESMAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5234 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of filling stations in Martha's Vineyard User:Pepper 12:36, 27 January 2011 (UTC) delete Not notable at all, . ''':.:∙:∙∙:∙:.:| Deletion of List of filling stations in Martha's Vineyard WP:DIRECTORY Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5235 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feminist imperative User:ReyBrujo 05:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC) delete I would go with the definition here, unless a good resource is provided Deletion of Feminist imperative WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5236 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Grisanti User:Jbhunley 13:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC) delete Not enough coverage in |independent, |reliable sources to |verify or |sustian article. Fails |Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and . His emplyment bio does nothing to demonstrate notability Deletion of Anthony Grisanti WP:IS||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:NRV||WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5237 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Arthur (musician) User:W 02:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC) keep he's listed on AMG and they've reviewed his album on Bardic http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:s963tr3tkl5x. His 2000 album was on The Orchard (music label) apparently. would seem to meet based on that. Also, Google search suggests there's some reliable sources with information on him, so article could be expanded Deletion of Ben Arthur (musician) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5238 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of vehicles in The Simpsons (2nd nomination) User:JGardner 16:14, 15 November 2006 (UTC) delete """per #IINFO. I fail to see how any """"clean up"""" of this article can make a list of the vehicles seen on The Simpsons encyclopedic. If the vehicles were somehow vitally important to the dynamic of the show, I might be convinced; but they're not, they're just the animated equivalent of props. Pure fancruft""" Deletion of List of vehicles in The Simpsons (2nd nomination) WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5239 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shmuel Yerushalmi User:IZAK 07:05, 20 February 2007 (UTC) delete as it violates and also as well as #SOAPBOX and #WEBSPACE Deletion of Shmuel Yerushalmi WP:NN||WP:COI||WP:NOT||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5240 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molecular economics User:Dpbsmith 13:35, 2 December 2005 (UTC) delete as |unverifiable unless far better evidence is provided prior to close of discussion. At the very least, we need an ISBN is given for the |single cited source and easily verifiable evidence that the book exists. Google books shows http://books.google.com/books?q=Subjectivist+Labornomics&btnG=Search+Books&hl=en no hits on Subjectivist Labornomics and no hits on http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Arthur+W.+Baron%22&btnG=Search+Books&hl=en Arthur W. Baron. If this were an important theory and book, it is almost certain that a 1999 book itself or references to it would show up in Google Books. The http://www.upne.com/bip_index_0002.html University Press of New England's complete author/title index shows a book by Mary Baron entitled ''Wheat among Bones'' and one by Barron, Jonathan N on Jewish American Poetry but nothing resembling the cited book. Looks, sounds, feels, tastes and smells like a transparent hoax; the onus is on the contributor to show othersize Deletion of Molecular economics WP:V||WP:CITE Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5241 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tirukkural translations into Meitei User:Kautilya3 06:54, 9 June 2021 (UTC) delete or '''Merge''' to Central Institute of Classical Tamil. Wikipedia is Deletion of Tirukkural translations into Meitei WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5242 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lesser realm User:TonyBallioni 14:35, 16 October 2007 (UTC) delete If any reliable sources can be found (unlikely as that may be) Transwiki to Wiktionary. If no sources can be provided delete per Deletion of Lesser realm WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +5243 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand ole party User:Erechtheus 15:18, 25 August 2007 (UTC) keep http://www.pluginmusic.com/news/archive.php?id=2012 This article appears to establish that they are about to embark on a national tour. I think that's good enough for notability under even if the standard is ''technically'' that they have already been on the tour. It makes no sense to delete now and then have notability cemented a few weeks from now when they make their first move from west coast to east coast on the tour Deletion of Grand ole party WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5244 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XConsortium User:Epinoia 02:14, 6 September 2019 (UTC) delete """does not meet : has not """"received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject"""" - also, Wikipedia:One sentence does not an article make""" Deletion of XConsortium WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5245 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayra Rivera User:Tsistunagiska 20:47, 22 January 2021 (UTC) keep Can't argue here. Apparently is the only guideline which a person can completely fail the basic litmus test for notability to be included and yet still be notable just because they are a member of academia. Must be nice to not have to be held to higher standards than this. Significant coverage be damned. Is that a primary source? Meh, who cares, they are a professor, scholar or and a member of the superior caste of academia Deletion of Mayra Rivera WP:PROF||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5246 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna M. Cienciala User:Xxanthippe 01:40, 2 January 2011 (UTC) delete GS cites are 25, 11, 8, 4 .... Inadequate to meet rof#C1. Emeritus does not help; by that time achievement should be apparent Deletion of Anna M. Cienciala WP:P Wikipedia:Portal 50 +5247 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seapunk User:Tokyogirl79 07:11, 21 November 2011 (UTC) delete This is a very, very recently coined term and as such, doesn't have anything that would be considered a reliable source. In response to '''Dinospartan117''', a term, person, place, or item might be considered notable within a group of people, but that doesn't automatically mean it's notable enough to go onto Wikipedia. What's needed to prove notability are reliable sources. (See for what's considered a reliable source.) Unfortunately I didn't find that when I did a search on this term. I found some blogs, youtube videos, and sources that would be considered trivial at best, but I didn't find anything reliable. A reliable source would be if Rolling Stone did an article on seapunk or if it was covered in a news article. That said, I think that it might be worth userfying () until Dinospartan117 can find enough reliable sources to flesh the term out Deletion of Seapunk WP:RS||WP:USERFY Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5248 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Bull user:Andrew 18:23, 24 September 2020 (UTC) keep It seems easy to find more coverage of this notable warrior. See ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=xj9oFICvaRYC&pg=PA38 Hokahey! A Good Day to Die!'', for example. Applicable policies include ; ; and Deletion of One Bull WP:ATD||WP:NEXIST||WP:NOTPAPER||WP:PRESERVE Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +5249 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Lindberg User:Northamerica1000 01:36, 4 August 2014 (UTC) delete Source searches are not demonstrating notability for the subject; does not appear to meet for a Wikipedia article Deletion of Greg Lindberg WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5250 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grassman User:FOARP 20:15, 19 December 2018 (UTC) keep per . See references here: https://books.google.pl/books?id=XAgmDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA116&dq=ohio+grassman&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi4rdjY2azfAhVmsosKHT5lB1MQ6AEINTAC#v=onepage&q=ohio%20grassman&f=false 1 https://books.google.pl/books?id=awRgLQi_R5sC&pg=PA127&dq=ohio+grassman&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi4rdjY2azfAhVmsosKHT5lB1MQ6AEIVjAI#v=onepage&q=ohio%20grassman&f=false 2 Deletion of Grassman WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5251 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of women linguists User:Cnilep 06:03, 27 December 2016 (UTC) keep the topic is inherently notable. There are major problems with the current state of the article, including a lack of clear inclusion criteria, insufficient lead section, and some questionable inclusions. These seem , though. It's true that clean up will require time and effort, but it's equally true that rebuilding after deletion, presumably with some of the same content there now, will require time and effort, plus entail loss of edit history. (And if more evidence is needed that women linguists is a notable topic, see http://www.linguisticsociety.org/about/who-we-are/committees/status-women-linguistics Committee on the Status of Women in Linguistics and links therein Deletion of List of women linguists WP:SURMOUNTABLE Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +5252 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gravity Hurts (song) User:RichardOSmith 20:18, 27 February 2015 (UTC) keep per use of the title song by Lego (#5 Deletion of Gravity Hurts (song) WP:NALBUMS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5253 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khrystyna Pereviznyk User:Number 17:52, 18 December 2019 (UTC) delete per failure. The fact that the league is top level is irrelevant Deletion of Khrystyna Pereviznyk WP:NFOOTY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5254 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Voice User:Uncle 18:26, 3 November 2010 (UTC) merge to Brooke Hogan. Since this album was never released, it is not notable enough for its own article per . Could serve as a useful redirect Deletion of This Voice WP:NMUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5255 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defeating Jihad User:RayAYang 23:42, 20 December 2008 (UTC) merge Keep''' Multiple reviews in secondary sources independent of the subject. These are notable, well-known magazines with serious editorial processes (within the bounds of ), and their reviews more than suffice for , whatever their political slants Deletion of Defeating Jihad WP:RS||WP:BK Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5256 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cubicle 7 User:Scarpy 19:29, 21 August 2018 (UTC) delete not a gamer here, but to my eyes this looks non-notable and the discussion regarding the 20 page chapter is not particularly relevant here as there is so much in this article. If a comprehensive article could be written using multiple reliable independent sources with in depth coverage, would reverse me decision Deletion of Cubicle 7 WP:SPS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5257 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jakiw Palij (2nd nomination) User:Ukexpat 15:37, 10 January 2011 (UTC) delete per nomination, appears to be a clear Deletion of Jakiw Palij (2nd nomination) WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +5258 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roomsurge.com User:DoriSmith 00:26, 2 June 2012 (UTC) delete """I don't see a claim to """"importance or significance"""" anywhere in the article—just that they exist. It doesn't appear to meet either otability (organizations and companies) or . Now that I think about it, it ''should'' be up for CSD… I think I'll go do that, in fact""" Deletion of Roomsurge.com WP:N||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5259 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xiaoze Xie User:B 02:29, 1 December 2011 (UTC) keep Per SarahStierch - clearly passes Deletion of Xiaoze Xie WP:ARTIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5260 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Titus (2nd nomination) User:Robofish 12:27, 21 February 2010 (UTC) delete I'm inclined to agree that this is virtually a case of . Technically it isn't, as the news stories cover more than a single event, but I'm not convinced there's real longterm notability here: this is just a case of a man who was convicted of rape and then had his conviction overturned, with no indication of what makes it particularly important. The strongest claim to being article-worthy is that the coverage of the story won the Pulitzer prize; but so have many other news stories, and does that make them all notable? I don't think so (if anything, it's a claim to the notability of the person who wrote the article instead Deletion of Steve Titus (2nd nomination) WP:ONEEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5261 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marco Del Rossi User:Protonk 23:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC) delete I am given no indication that this or any other deletion represents some watershed event. The nominator is just adding deletion nominations and merge suggestions of fictional subjects one by one. No part of that is some broad scheme to force us to make a proxy decision for every article out there. This particular article cites no sources (and hasn't for 6 months), covers a fictional subject in a manner that is entirely |plot repetition and http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Marco+Del+Rossi%22+-wikipedia+-wiki+-myspace&btnG=Search appears to http://books.google.com/books?id=CFXgj7a55agC&pg=PA679&dq=%22Marco+Del+Rossi%22&ei=rDjUSKjbFYzaigGTjP3mAw&sig=ACfU3U1ODeO6GpPhTwRbiOzt9goLyZrKFA receive at best trivial coverage from http://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=pn&q=%22Marco+Del+Rossi%22 reliable sources Deletion of Marco Del Rossi WP:PLOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5262 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brady R. Allred User:Edtropolis 18:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC) keep Meets criteria of . Needs improvement, though. User got bad nom faith Deletion of Brady R. Allred WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5263 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upcoming nintendo products User:Firebug 21:44, 3 December 2005 (UTC) delete possible copyvio, advertising, a crystal ball Deletion of Upcoming nintendo products WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5264 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of notable distant cousins of Barack Obama User:Otherlleft 03:04, 17 November 2008 (UTC) delete """even though I am an ardent defender of lists on Wikipedia. The phrase """"distant cousins"""" is incredibly vague; ''every single notable person'' that doesn't have a closer relationship with Obama is a distant cousin, and given enough time and research those relationships may very well be verifiable. I don't see how this fulfills the criteria laid out at and """ Deletion of List of notable distant cousins of Barack Obama WP:LISTS||WP:CLN Wikipedia:Lists 36 +5265 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polypop User:Omtay38 20:17, 12 July 2007 (UTC) delete and perhaps Deletion of Polypop WP:BJAODN Wikipedia:Silly Things 52 +5266 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compound Document Comparison User:Dialectric 23:33, 25 November 2015 (UTC) delete Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A single Patent ref does not do anything to establish notability, and a search turned up no significant coverage. Article was created by an Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|SPA as an apparent POV/Promo fork of Compound document Deletion of Compound Document Comparison WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5267 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VEMA High Angle Rescue User:VQuakr 05:48, 12 February 2011 (UTC) delete There are many articles about rescue organizations on Wikipedia, but Wikipedia:Org#No_inherent_notability|notability is not inherent. The existing references in the article do not establish notability because one is the group's home page, one is a blog, and the last is not about the organization. This at a ''weak'' delete for me due to the mild inherent bias of the guideline: I think an identical organization from North America would meet the but local media in KwaZulu-Natal might have less of an online presence. I agree with the author that the similarity to other works does not justify deletion on copyright grounds here Deletion of VEMA High Angle Rescue WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5268 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Dorosh User:Jersey92 02:41, 30 August 2014 (UTC) delete Easily fails - At best this is . It is irrelevant how long the article was in the article namespace. If anything the dormant article indicates that people were not interested in it, and that the subject was not receiving coverage Deletion of Danny Dorosh WP:NACTOR||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5269 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survival food User:Tree 03:52, 27 June 2006 (UTC) merge to Survival kit, don't merge since the article seems to be as mentioned by nom Deletion of Survival food WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5270 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A State of Mind (band) (2nd nomination) User:David 09:39, 6 October 2016 (UTC) comment fr:A State of Mind (which this appears to be at least partially a translation of) has some RSes. Interviews: http://limonadier.net/interview-a-state-of-mind-the-jade-amulet/http://www.francetvinfo.fr/culture/musique/a-state-of-mind-histoires-de-hip-hop_1704989.html Reviews: http://www.musisphere.com/article-266-ASM-A-State-of-Mind-The-Jade-Amulet.htmlhttp://www.trip-hop.net/album-1930-a-state-of-mind-platypus-funk-laboratoire.html Not quite sure those three alone bring it up to , but it's not implausible Deletion of A State of Mind (band) (2nd nomination) WP:NMUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5271 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tour de Kits User:Kinu 19:28, 25 August 2006 (UTC) comment """No, nothing really """"deserves"""" to be on Wikipedia if it does not comply with policy, such as . |Reliable sources carry significantly more weight than impassioned claims around these parts""" Deletion of Tour de Kits WP:V||WP:RS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5272 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keyontyli Goffney (2nd nomination) User:Silver 21:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC) keep """I believe that he would meet 3 in , """"''starred in an iconic, groundbreaking or blockbuster feature''"""", since that's what it seems the video he and his brother starred in was. He would also meet 4, really, regardless of it being because of a single event""" Deletion of Keyontyli Goffney (2nd nomination) WP:PORNBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5273 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim R. McGovern User:Eddie 14:53, 9 July 2010 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Jim R. McGovern WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5274 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scottevest User:Snotbot 05:16, 24 December 2011 (UTC) comment This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (|step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 December 24 Deletion of Scottevest WP:AFDHOWTO Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +5275 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Small Town Murder User:Royboycrashfan 02:38, 9 February 2006 (UTC) delete doesn't meet Deletion of Small Town Murder WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5276 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priya Radhakrishnan User:Loriendrew 23:42, 5 February 2017 (UTC) delete As above, Deletion of Priya Radhakrishnan WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +5277 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Falkholt User:TheGracefulSlick 14:45, 17 January 2018 (UTC) comment """Really goes to show where the """"notability"""" lies when almost half of the entire article is devoted to a |few moments in the final three weeks of her life: car crash, surgery and death. But, then again, these are |the subjects enough editors feel are important in the moment. A few people here believe it was """"disrespectful"""" to nominate this for deletion but do you really believe Jessica (or anyone) would want a piece primarily devoted to the pitiful state she was left in as a result of the crash to remember her by? Sometimes, if you want to build an ''encyclopedia'', you can't let stories that pull at your heartstrings influence you""" Deletion of Jessica Falkholt WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +5278 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Craig (Jeopardy! contestant) (2nd nomination) User:Hurricanefan25 19:43, 16 November 2011 (UTC) delete per - he is only important/well-covered because of his appearances on Jeopardy!. There has been ''little, if any'' significant coverage of Craig outside of the Jeopardy! circle Deletion of Roger Craig (Jeopardy! contestant) (2nd nomination) WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +5279 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henrik Breimyr User:Hobbes 17:53, 16 December 2011 (UTC) delete """Fails and . Ghits are stray mentions in football-centric news reports, primary, social media, a bit in football blogs. Only 18 and seems to have some promise, so I could see him achieving ''actual'' notability in future (and not just a technical """"meets NFOOTY"""" characterization). But not there yet""" Deletion of Henrik Breimyr WP:NFOOTY||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5280 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hunter Biden laptop controversy User:CutePeach 16:13, 15 August 2021 (UTC) keep """this is an independently controversy that is out of the scope for Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory, as it is currently named. This controversy is reported by RS to involve 1) the Democratic party which - on behalf of Joe Biden - denied an allegation that is possibly supported by laptop data, 2) a group of 50 former intelligence professionals who made the widely publicised but unsubstantiated claim - during the 2020 election - that this laptop is part a Russian information operation and 3) elements of the mainstream media are allegedly suppressing this story due to lack of access to primary data - just like they did with another topic we all know about - and 4) Federal officials delaying """"actions"""" so as not to adversely effect the outcome of the 2020 elections in favor of alleged Russian's goals. I created this article in good faith because I read the sources referenced here and also read the comments of multiple editors on the Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory talk page who do not believe its claims are verifiable or neutral. I would agree to a merge this page with that page if it is renamed as '''Biden–Ukraine controversy''', or something similarly neutral, and reworked to reflect more up-to-date sources""" Deletion of Hunter Biden laptop controversy WP:NOTABLE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5281 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalil Duhoki User:Mscuthbert 18:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC) comment note that nominator has few edits besides listing numerous Kurdish academics for deletion; it looks like a or nationalist dispute. See Special:Contributions/Hassan_Rebell Deletion of Khalil Duhoki WP:POINT Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +5282 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donington Park services User:Necrothesp 02:09, 24 September 2006 (UTC) comment """No, unsourced material is not necessarily """"original research"""". This term has started to be bandied around a little too freely in recent months, usually by people trying to support their desire to delete something. It's a good idea to read to see what actually constitutes original research on Wikipedia - it's summarised in the little box at the top. This clearly states the position - stating a fact (e.g. """"Donington Park services is a motorway service station off the M1 motorway and A42 interchange near Derby, England"""") is not original research; advancing a theory which has not been published by a reputable source is. Yes, it's always better to source articles, but don't just dismiss articles as OR because they're unsourced""" Deletion of Donington Park services WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5283 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shermco Industries (2nd nomination) User:Pharaoh 06:46, 1 October 2018 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Shermco Industries (2nd nomination) WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5284 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WotWentWrong User:Northamerica1000 21:43, 20 December 2013 (UTC) keep Meets . Source examples include: http://abcnews.go.com/Health/singles-dating-website-lets-called-back/story?id=15683556#.T88e9rS6SuK ABC News, http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/05/30/why-people-break-up_n_1556032.html?just_reloaded=1 Huffington Post, http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/06/us-app-romance-breakup-idUSTRE81513420120206 Reuters Deletion of WotWentWrong WP:WEBCRIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5285 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WZMT - Minecraft Radio User:Davey2010 22:46, 12 July 2014 (UTC) delete per nom, Found no evidence of any |notability Deletion of WZMT - Minecraft Radio WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5286 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darius Mosun User:CiaranG 08:12, 31 January 2007 (UTC) delete there seems to me to be a clear issue with the article which is evident both from the promotional tone, and the author's linkspamming activities, though in fairness I must point out that the author has strongly denied any problems with or . The sources provided on the article page do not establish notability per . The additional sources discussed on the talk page might well satisfy for the company in question, but not for the individual. If the article were to stay, it would need a complete re-write from reliable sources, if available, since currently it reads like an advert Deletion of Darius Mosun WP:COI||WP:AUTO||WP:COI||WP:BIO||WP:CORP Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +5287 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam D Brown User:Bearcat 06:11, 1 September 2017 (UTC) delete Nothing here passes a notability criterion, and the sourcing isn't cutting it in the least — he has to be the ''subject'' of the coverage, not just glancingly namechecked in coverage of other things, to pass GNG. Wikipedia also does not ''owe'' anybody an article, as the creator seems to think. Also, I share the view expressed above that there's a fairly obvious |conflict of interest here Deletion of Adam D Brown WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +5288 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Foreman III User:Niteshift36 12:18, 14 June 2009 (UTC) comment """It says """"pro"""". Was this sanctioned by any of the recognized boxing federations? If so, he'd qualify under . If not, then I'd say non-notable""" Deletion of George Foreman III WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5289 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitweaver (3rd nomination) User:Kappa 20:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC) delete for the fourth time and salt the earth. There are still no assertions of notability whatsoever in this article, much less any that would satisfy one of the three criteria listed in . Even the limited information that ''is'' there is not sourced by any references whatsoever, so fails . The two refs that Deletion of Bitweaver (3rd nomination) WP:CORP||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5290 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recommended precaution (2nd nomination) User:Schizombie 06:11, 16 March 2006 (UTC) comment """Probably agree with nom, but what is the actual arabic term for """"recommended precaution""""? It should have been added to the article in the beginning. Additionally, if this stub were to be merged (per it cannot exist as it is), where should it go""" Deletion of Recommended precaution (2nd nomination) WP:WINAD Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +5291 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Portugal, San Jose User:Qworty 11:56, 28 November 2012 (UTC) delete for failing Deletion of Little Portugal, San Jose WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5292 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sloppy seconds (sexual practice) User:Malik 19:13, 27 March 2016 (UTC) keep """Satisfies . Also not a neologism, unless it's still considered """"relatively new"""" after https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=sloppy+seconds&case_insensitive=on&year_start=1950&year_end=2000 50 years of documented usage in print. — """ Deletion of Sloppy seconds (sexual practice) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5293 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Izvjestaj User:Kevin1243 02:54, 15 May 2006 (UTC) delete as |unverified and highly |POV Deletion of Izvjestaj WP:V||WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5294 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brentyn Milverton (2nd nomination) User:LibStar 11:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Brentyn Milverton (2nd nomination) WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5295 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trí Phải User:Aymatth2 16:43, 4 June 2020 (UTC) keep Check w:vi:Trí Phải. This is a significant settlement with a population of 12,970 as of 2005. Passes Deletion of Trí Phải WP:NGEO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5296 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alim Ahmed Fatah User:Scoobycentric 10:05, 5 June 2009 (UTC) comment How is providing elaborate evidence for your case against deletion an attempt to overload/exhaust or worst 'questionable' conduct? I'm being told he doesn't pass /BIO but nobody elaborates where/why he fails?, i'm disappointed with that, this shouldn't be a 'vote' only with a few cryptic sentences accompanying it. Point by point i have addressed the requirements of and several times i have had to re-iterate a point already answered, giving me the suspicion none of the sources i have provided was actually read. Secondly reliable sources have been dismissed because of the 'proponent for deletion' unfamiliarity with them, which i think is unfair, the equivalant would be for me to dismiss the 'Hindustan times' serving predominantly the Indian community because i know nothing about it Deletion of Alim Ahmed Fatah WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5297 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nidal Malik Hasan User:Falcorian 20:19, 13 November 2009 (UTC) keep Huge amount of coverage in reliable sources so he clearly passes . The length and density of citations in the article attest to this fact Deletion of Nidal Malik Hasan WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5298 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Automatic Request Generator User:Joe 22:42, 21 May 2010 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Automatic Request Generator WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5299 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Cosmic Era mobile units User:Sephiroth 04:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC) delete no |reliable, |verifiable out-of-universe third party sources to establish its |notability Deletion of List of Cosmic Era mobile units WP:RS||WP:V||WP:N Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5300 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beaucoups of Blues (song) User:HexaChord 00:27, 10 March 2009 (UTC) comment I did not suggest the song for deletion, but contested a proposal for deletion, since I'm quite sure that there's enough 3rd party coverage incl. libraries of secondary literature on everything any of the former Beatles members has ever recorded. I don't have any books on the topic, so can't improve the article much. I didn't even realise that it was released as a single until Nosleep coined the USA charts. Note that the infoboxes for songs and singles are quite often mixed up. It took me less than two minutes to find the charts entry for Germany. Musicline is the reliable source accepted by German Wikipedia (see: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Charts#Deutschland link). IMHO the nominator should have done a small research on his own ''before'' proposing or nominating the article for deletion (see ). The best case would have been to improve the article and thus save a lot of time and energy. --''Avant-garde a clue Deletion of Beaucoups of Blues (song) WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +5301 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveen Bawa User:Adamstraw99 14:54, 26 August 2018 (UTC) delete lacks sufficient coverage and fails Deletion of Naveen Bawa WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5302 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pridgen cipher User:Armbrust 00:54, 17 May 2010 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Pridgen cipher WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +5303 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/California gubernatorial election, 2022 User:StartTerminal 04:13, 20 April 2018 (UTC) delete Seems more fit for |PROD than AfD, but whatever Deletion of California gubernatorial election, 2022 WP:PROD Wikipedia:Proposed deletion 92 +5304 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sixguns over tombstone User:JavierMC 04:27, 23 October 2008 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Sixguns over tombstone WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5305 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homeland Security Digital Library User:AusLondonder 23:01, 10 November 2015 (UTC) delete No indication of meeting Deletion of Homeland Security Digital Library WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5306 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPod touch Fans User:Ohnoitsjamie 02:21, 2 October 2008 (UTC) comment Can someone show me the two non-trivial coverages in reliable sources? I have yet to hear any keep criteria based on our notability policy Deletion of IPod touch Fans WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5307 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miami Beach Visitor and Convention Authority User:Ajf773 19:06, 23 October 2018 (UTC) delete per and Deletion of Miami Beach Visitor and Convention Authority WP:NOTPROMO||WP:GNG Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5308 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas tait User:MichaelQSchmidt 04:00, 10 June 2010 (UTC) keep While failing , and while he has had small roles in his early career as has any actor, it is my determination that in his total careerhttp://www.imdb.com/name/nm1408752/maindetails he meets . His SAG Awards nomination is a nice extra.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Tait#Awards_.26_nominations Deletion of Douglas tait WP:GNG||WP:ENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5309 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalitta Charters Flight 720 User:Devokewater 20:09, 18 March 2021 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Kalitta Charters Flight 720 WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5310 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Datawasp User:Stifle 19:58, 30 April 2008 (UTC) delete unless |citations from |reliable sources are added to comply with the |verifiability policy Deletion of Datawasp WP:CITE||WP:RS||WP:V Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5311 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Miller (entertainer) User:The 01:48, 19 September 2016 (UTC) keep """The article is different in a number of ways from the deleted """"Filthy Frank"""" page, so I don't believe the previous deletion discussion can entirely apply to this article. The current article is written in a much better manner, the only issue is lacking a few citations, and that's mainly because he prefers to keep his personal life hidden, instead having most of the fame being attributed to his fictional alias. The individual himself does fall into the requirements of #Entertainers, as he has quite large cult following, and has influenced modern pop culture more-so than the average YouTuber. It would be foolish to delete this article, he will just become more notable and a discussion about having the article will arise in a year""" Deletion of George Miller (entertainer) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5312 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westbeach User:MilborneOne 21:16, 14 March 2020 (UTC) keep """per , which says, """"Generally, an individual radio or television program is likely to be notable if it airs on a network of radio or television stations (either national or regional in scope)."""" This was a BBC1 show. Also — the article has been improved by""" Deletion of Westbeach WP:NTV||WP:HEY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5313 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Occupations of the future User:Silly 14:19, 6 February 2009 (UTC) delete This falls squarely under and Deletion of Occupations of the future WP:CRYSTAL||WP:OR Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5314 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary C. Ross User:Anotherclown 00:22, 5 July 2015 (UTC) delete """per nomination. Obviously there is some useful information which can be included elsewhere - if it hasn't already (like at Don't ask, don't tell per the suggestions above). Otherwise the subject doesn't appear to be notable per (lacks """"significant"""" coverage in independent |reliable sources). Likewise fails and as far as I can see. I'm also concerned about the |COI and advocacy aspects the article seems to present (is Wikipedia being used here as a forum to question the validity of an administrative decision, i.e. his non-promotion and discharge for instance?) Overall, a fairly junior officer with a relatively average / normal / undistinguished career that seems little different from all the others who have trodden the same path (setting aside the LGBT issues which as I said should be addressed elsewhere - but even then only briefly so as not to breach """ Deletion of Gary C. Ross WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:SOLDIER||WP:AUTHOR||WP:COI||WP:UNDUE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5315 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone User:Justinkunimune 21:45, 10 June 2020 (UTC) delete I contest the claim that this has received widespread coverage. A cursory google brings up coverage, but not by any sites that I would consider mainstream (CNN, New York Times, etc.) except maybe Fox News. If it gets more coverage in the next week or so then we can reinstate this article, but the fact that we don't know for sure yet whether this will be remembered in a year makes this a clear case of Deletion of Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +5316 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Adams (Character) User:Ihcoyc 15:05, 10 March 2010 (UTC) comment This article is about a character from the film ''The Magnificent Seven''; see also rticles for deletion/Bernardo O'Reilly. Suggest that the two discussions share a common outcome, whatever that may be Deletion of Chris Adams (Character) WP:A Wikipedia:Attribution 34 +5317 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hellboy fictional timeline User:Shooterwalker 02:10, 7 March 2011 (UTC) delete putting aside how much I enjoy the timeline and the series... the timeline is entirely a plot summary, which fails what Wikipedia is not. See #PLOT which has been a policy in good standing for several years, despite failed attempts to come up with a better alternative. I suppose you can add some third-party sources that cover the reception and development of the series, but then that would belong in the main series article, not a devoted to repeating the same plot summary in list form Deletion of Hellboy fictional timeline WP:NOT||WP:CONTENTFORK Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5318 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shuoji Zhou User:Ifnord 00:56, 24 August 2018 (UTC) delete per nom as . I was sure I was going to vote keep after reading the Forbes article, it really is a solid reference. But, searching for another reference proved fruitless. A speaker at several Chinese conventions, mentions in some blogs, but really nothing else. Surprising Deletion of Shuoji Zhou WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +5319 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Kinkaid School Archives User:Edison 02:43, 6 May 2012 (UTC) merge """It is just a kindergarten through 12th grade school. """"Other stuff exists"""" is not a viable argument for keeping this article, but rather a suggestion that an AFD for Phillips Exeter Academy Library|Phillips Exeter Academy Libraries is needed. The argument also conflates a modest 160 thousand volume school library (at Exeter) with the mere archives of a lesser-known school, Kincaid. Fails """ Deletion of The Kinkaid School Archives WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5320 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Deer Run User:RebeccaGreen 09:05, 27 August 2019 (UTC) comment I have found some coverage about camps called Deer Run in Newspapers.com, but it will take time to work out where the camps are located (Texas, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, New York ...), and how much coverage relates to these particular camps (why two in one article?). Per , the state of sourcing within an article is not a reason to delete, and the nominator does not indicate that they have done a thorough , particularly in historical sources Deletion of Camp Deer Run WP:NEXIST||WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5321 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overworld User:EyeSerene 16:41, 27 July 2007 (UTC) delete per , , and Propaniac Deletion of Overworld WP:NEO||WP:ATT||WP:DICDEF Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +5322 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warx2 (2nd nomination) User:Auric 22:40, 8 March 2014 (UTC) delete Not because it it isn't notable, simply because it's |too soon. Hasn't been released yet and hasn't been reviewed Deletion of Warx2 (2nd nomination) WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +5323 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finest Hour (quartet) User:Aguyintobooks 09:25, 3 September 2017 (UTC) keep I see enough sources to (just) meet and guidelines. There is no requirement for any 'non-music source', nor is their getting an award discounted due to the award not having an article. Despite various arguments about their world prominence, that is not relevant, the world number 124,000th quartet has an equal chance of being notable, what matters are |reliable independent sources Deletion of Finest Hour (quartet) WP:GNG||WP:NMUSIC||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5324 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barona Valley Ranch Resort and Casino User:Adrian 21:17, 16 March 2006 (UTC) delete Not really a speedy candidate. |non-notable corporation Deletion of Barona Valley Ranch Resort and Casino WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5325 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Healthpoint Ltd User:Bobherry 16:15, 31 March 2015 (UTC) delete Not notable. Deletion of Healthpoint Ltd WP:NOTABLE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5326 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex, Drugs & Superheroes User:Ohnoitsjamie 20:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC) delete No in-depth coverage in third-party sources Deletion of Sex, Drugs & Superheroes WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5327 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorca Cohen User:Scope 17:14, 29 May 2017 (UTC) delete Poor quality sources make it non notable. Fails Deletion of Lorca Cohen WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +5328 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riky Ash User:Colapeninsula 10:02, 26 May 2015 (UTC) delete Lacking sufficient sources: it's all Lincolnshire/Nottinghamshire local press except from the Business Matters interview, which doesn't count as a reliable source (because it's an interview). Purely local press isn't normally considered sufficient for notability. Doesn't meet , or Deletion of Riky Ash WP:NSPORT||WP:NACTOR||WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5329 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Robert Fuller (2nd nomination) User:Aseleste 11:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC) keep The subject of the article is the event, not the person, so and should not apply here.{{Paragraph break}}As for notability as an event, the previous consensus was that it meets (and is not the main policy contested in this AfD Deletion of Death of Robert Fuller (2nd nomination) WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO1E||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +5330 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Taylor (basketball) User:Dirtlawyer1 02:41, 28 November 2012 (UTC) keep """Having reviewed the sources available regarding the subject to date, I am satisfied that he and/or his record satisfy the general notability guidelines per . I was less convinced that the subject was not a """"one-hit"""" wonder, subject to the """"one event"""" exception per . However, please note the following quoted language from : """"some subject specific notability guidelines such as Wikipedia:Notability (sports) provide criteria that may support the notability of certain individuals who are known chiefly for one event."""" This exception to the """"one event"""" exception seems to cover exactly this sort of notable sports event. I might also add that I explored whether Wikipedia has an appropriate """"list of"""" article that includes American college basketball record-holders; we do not. So, congratulations, Mr. Jack Taylor, I think you get to have your very own Wikipedia article""" Deletion of Jack Taylor (basketball) WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5331 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mochila Inc. User:AllyD 12:31, 2 July 2018 (UTC) delete I can see a couple of brief items relating to the company's partnership with Belo in 2007 (https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-169100774.html {{Highbeam}}) and being commissioned to develop an Emmy archive website (https://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/108813/and-the-emmys-go-to-mochila.html), but nothing that rises about routine announcements. Fails Deletion of Mochila Inc. :WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5332 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KOMPRESSOR User:Dnofos 22:35, 14 December 2005 (UTC) keep Is there a reason to expunge this piece of information from wikipedia? I think this artist meets the criteria for 'notable', only in a way not foreseen by Deletion of KOMPRESSOR WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5333 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Long Way Up User:Ginsengbomb 09:27, 1 December 2010 (UTC) delete I see no evidence that this TV series has |commenced principal photography Deletion of Long Way Up WP:NFF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5334 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PhpWCMS User:Joe 13:36, 4 August 2009 (UTC) delete All that I can find is trivial mentions. Fails Deletion of PhpWCMS WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5335 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Burn a Koran Day User:EnabledDanger 20:52, 9 September 2010 (UTC) delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball rystal. In a couple of months we may know whether this subject is notable or not, but not today Deletion of International Burn a Koran Day WP:C Wikipedia:Copyrights 60 +5336 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Andrew Dunckelman User:Robert 00:20, 13 July 2010 (UTC) keep The guy does seem to get around, and for somebody his age he certainly has made an impact in his community. Apparently he was even quoted extensively in a newspaper article about a recycling program in Louisiana (http://www.houmatoday.com/article/20090724/ARTICLES/907241004). For me this one is right on the line in terms of notability, where what he has accomplished certainly makes his contributions stand out in a crowd, but it is still rather modest. I don't know what to think about him showing up in the news for several issues above and beyond the initial claim to fame. Unfortunately, the real reason I'd like to keep this article isn't really valid as it is sort of a |crystal ball hope that this guy might make something more of his life and become notable in the future. He does meet the very hard nosed technical qualifications for notability (sort of stretching the imagination a bit), but is that enough Deletion of William Andrew Dunckelman WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5337 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Md. Ziaul Haque User:Binksternet 23:42, 26 May 2014 (UTC) delete per . Not notable Deletion of Md. Ziaul Haque WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5338 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indiana State Police Pension Trust v. Chrysler User:South 22:16, 27 June 2009 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Indiana State Police Pension Trust v. Chrysler WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5339 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunwest Solutions User:AllyD 13:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC) delete """This AfD and my CSD A7 were placed near-simultaneously. Anyway, this article has a similar pattern to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nettech Ltd in that the article asserts claims sourced only to a Yellow Pages listing and uses the Design Museum website as a """"reference"""" (which mentions neither firm). No |real evidence of |notability""" Deletion of Sunwest Solutions :WP:RS||:WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5340 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual Digital Cable User:SorryGuy 01:09, 14 August 2006 (UTC) delete Seems to meet criteria and intention of to me Deletion of Virtual Digital Cable WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5341 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roshni Haripriyan User:Bapinghosh 19:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Roshni Haripriyan WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5342 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Munk One User:Kinu 17:06, 28 November 2006 (UTC) delete no evidence from of meeting . Also a suspected article Deletion of Munk One WP:RS||WP:BIO||WP:COI Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5343 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spikor User:A 00:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC) keep as this particular character is notable to people in the real world with even a http://civilizedpigdom.com/motu/spikor/img/cover.jpg cover titular appearance of a publication in addition to being on the show and as a http://www.timelesstrinkets.com/HeManSheRa/Images/HeManSpikorComplete.jpg toy. As nominator offers a merge location above, at worst we would follow and and do that instead of redlinking. Sincerely Deletion of Spikor WP:BEFORE||WP:PRESERVE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +5344 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Information Clearing House (second nomination) User:Tewfik 19:35, 16 May 2007 (UTC) delete failure of criteria. There has been more than enough time for adding sourcing Deletion of Information Clearing House (second nomination) WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5345 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Goodrich Club User:RoySmith 13:13, 19 September 2019 (UTC) delete Fails , badly. Clubcruft Deletion of The Goodrich Club WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5346 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sultan ul Faqr Publications User:JugniSQ 08:42, 10 August 2015 (UTC) keep The article should not be deleted. I have done some research on it and found that this publication does meet https://www.google.com/search?q=books%20on%20faqr&rct=j. It is not only about the publication, it is also about the work that the publication is doing. The books it publishes are popular and notable …People turn to Wikipedia to learn about the credentials of a particular topic and this is what Wikipedia users want. The primary purpose of an encyclopedia is to provide information and providing sources is secondary. To say that the article of a particular publication should be removed because it not notable is ticking off the fact that users are only going to learn about the publication from Wikipedia itself and this in itself a necessary criteria for the article to keep. The contributions made by this publication with reference to Islam/Sufism cannot be disregarded. It would not be wrong to call them unique or prolific in the field of Sufism. Give me one good reason for deleting this article based on publication and not any other article on publication from the List of Urdu language book publishing companies. Be fair and offer justice here on Wikipedia. All the web sources cited talk about Sultan ul Faqr Publications. Despite the references, the publication house is clearly known for its books all over the web as well as nationally in Pakistan. The article does not violate any Wikipedia rule. In fact, Wikipedia itself encourages publishing material relevant to the notability focusing on high-quality secondary or external sources which in this case have been cited as Britannica, Marymartin, ISSUE, etc Deletion of Sultan ul Faqr Publications WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5347 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Clayton (footballer) User:Backslash 17:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC) delete per above, fails for not playing a professional match Deletion of Adam Clayton (footballer) WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5348 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tejinder Singh User:Dlohcierekim 20:27, 31 August 2013 (UTC) delete Significant and living, but does not meet Deletion of Tejinder Singh WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5349 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeflateGate User:Epicgenius 18:40, 25 January 2015 (UTC) keep This is covered in numerous reliable sources. While there have been multiple underinflated balls used in football games over the years, this one is quite significantly covered. It may be deleted later if this event has no significant impact in the future, though, per and Deletion of DeflateGate WP:NOTNEWS||WP:EVENT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5350 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jude Calvert-Toulmin User:Yunshui 23:10, 4 February 2012 (UTC) delete """None of the sources, including those listed above, come near to the requirements for |notability. The Sheffield Star article is about the best thing out there, but since it takes the form of an interview it veers to close to a |primary source for my tastes (and seriously, local papers shouldn't really count towards notability - I've been in my local rag numerous times, and I'm sure as hell not notable.) Blogs and IMDb are no-go per , and listings, as either a photographer or TV cast member/guest don't fulfil the requirement in for """"significant coverage""" Deletion of Jude Calvert-Toulmin WP:N||WP:PRIMARY||WP:USERG||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5351 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Sandelson User:Joe 15:16, 23 April 2012 (UTC) delete """after review of sources (and I reviewed this after, not before, Colapeninsula's changes. I'm ... pretty impressed by how effectively the push of press releases into the media appears to have been accomplished here, I'd be hard pressed to defend the reliability of nearly anything used as a source itn his article that provides substantial coverage. Putting aside likely """"reprinted press releases"""", I find insufficient sourcing to clearly meet , and given the very sensible concerns about insidious manipulation of sources, I'm unwilling to give any leeway whatsoever at the margin of our biographical guidelines""" Deletion of Johnny Sandelson WP:BASIC||WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5352 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donyi Taga (Networker) User:WikiDan61 15:41, 1 October 2014 (UTC) delete No indications of anything notable. A |run of the mill student Deletion of Donyi Taga (Networker) WP:MILL Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill 32 +5353 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sydney bus routes 100-199 (2nd nomination) User:JROBBO 05:19, 22 August 2006 (UTC) comment can people please address the issues at hand? I have clearly said that there is historical information available for some of these routes, which would make them notable. I don't have time to add them or research it at the moment, but they exist. There are historical remnants of the old tram routes along some of these bus routes, like old bus shelters and bus-only lanes which were used as tram lines before the trams were torn up. Secondly, this is NOT a timetable or bus schedule. I have said elsewhere that the timetable-like information would be deleted leaving just the bus routes and where they go, which has been established elsewhere as being worth keeping. Sydney is the biggest city in Australia. Why are its bus routes not worth keeping, whereas everywhere else is? Please answer that question and don't just quote all the time. There has been no non-notability established for lists of bus routes. Individual bus stops are not notable, but that is not being debated Deletion of Sydney bus routes 100-199 (2nd nomination) WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5354 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of media using the Wilhelm scream User:O 02:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC) comment Please take a look at Special:Contributions/Viperix and Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Canvassing on RfX's and similar pages. It is apparent that this user has been posting notifications about this AFD to pretty much random users and is considered |excessive cross-posting. Just wanted to give a heads up Deletion of List of media using the Wilhelm scream WP:CANVASS Wikipedia:Canvassing 30 +5355 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hardy Bucks [[User talk:Rannpháirtí anaithnid|coṁrá]]) 02:10, 24 July 2009 (UTC) keep """Not hugely notable but sources """"|address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content"""" (e.g. http://www.mayonews.ie/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=6931&Itemid=135 local newspaper 1, http://www.westernpeople.com/news/story/?trs=eycwgbkfql&cat=entertainment local newspaper 2, http://www.iftn.ie/?act1=record&only=1&aid=73&rid=4281916&tpl=archnews reliable website, http://www.rte.ie/arts/2009/0323/storyland.html RTÉ, etc.) As well as that, as noted on the talk page, it gets http://stats.grok.se/en/200906/Hardy%20Bucks quite a respectable number of hits per day. |Sources are an issue, and should be dealt with separately. But, as far notability, it reaches the target, albeit just barely. --rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid""" Deletion of Hardy Bucks WP:NOTABLE||WP:SOURCES Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5356 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sand Frizzle User:Doc 04:01, 2 September 2008 (UTC) delete WP:NFT|made up |nonsense. No applicable non-Wikipedia http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=Qth&q=%22sand+frizzle%22&btnG=Search ghits Deletion of Sand Frizzle WP:NONSENSE Wikipedia:Patent nonsense 77 +5357 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programs broadcast by Cartoonito User:TimothyBlue 13:57, 6 November 2020 (UTC) merge per above and nom as an   //  Deletion of List of programs broadcast by Cartoonito WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +5358 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Mohammad Pshtdar User:David 17:30, 27 July 2014 (UTC) delete """for lack of evidence of passing . Google scholar does find some of his works under the name """"Poshtdar"""" but not with enough citations to be worth much for notability""" Deletion of Ali Mohammad Pshtdar WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5359 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph de Warenne (2nd nomination) NONE NONE keep Do we really have to do this again? A historical figure does not have to do something noteworthy to be ''|notable''. There doesn't have to be a lot known for ''significant coverage'' to exist. Case in point, the rather undistinguished Ralph de Warenne has received significant coverage in the multiple reliable sources cited in the article, mainly because of his potential connection to the Whitchurch Warennes. There is no . The main secondary sources cited (Farrer 1923; Farrer & Clay 1949; Eyton 1859) are specifically about Ralph de Warenne and the article summarises what they say about him. The more tangential mentions in other secondary sources, and the few primary sources, are used appropriately, to clarify points of fact and make what is, as you say, an obscure and convoluted historical topic a little easier to parse Deletion of Ralph de Warenne (2nd nomination) WP:N||WP:SYNTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5360 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Shoes Unno User:LM2000 07:15, 2 June 2017 (UTC) delete I've heard of this referee, which is more than I can say for most. Unfortunately that's not enough to satisfy Deletion of Red Shoes Unno WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5361 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Equal Parenting Council User:Martinogk 12:25, 1 March 2019 (UTC) keep Per (i) As a federation of local affiliates, the organization has national scope, with media mentions across both urban and rural Canada, including e.g. Montreal, Toronto, Ottawa, Winnipeg, Calgary, Windsor, Saint John, Yellowknife, Barrie, Oshawa, Alliston and Portage La Prairie. (ii) Coverage in multiple reliable media sources, many but not all by independent journalists, and significant in the sense that the organization is cited in articles about the topic on which it is active rather than passing mentions in articles about something else. (iii) Some international coverage. (iv) Additional newspaper, academic, book and web sources exist, but the article already has citation overkill Deletion of Canadian Equal Parenting Council WP:NONPROFIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5362 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of NBC slogans User:Peripitus 09:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC) delete as clearly #IINFO|indiscriminate information for the sake of information Deletion of List of NBC slogans WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5363 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Realjamesh User:Jack 10:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC) delete Per all above. Spam verging on |complete bollocks. Sourcing is primarily dodgy SEO crap; none of which contributes a red cent to notability. |Wikipedia is not for promotion Deletion of Realjamesh WP:CB||WP:NOTPROMO Wikipedia:Complete bollocks 62 +5364 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn Valley Bible Methodist Church User:Green451 01:38, 23 November 2006 (UTC) delete per above comments. Just curious, is there a reason why something like this doesn't qualify for |CSD A7 Deletion of Dawn Valley Bible Methodist Church WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +5365 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billy Quinncroft User:Simione001 23:53, 7 July 2017 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Billy Quinncroft WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5366 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Hatcher User:Bearian 21:06, 19 July 2011 (UTC) delete per - I made several searches, and found that she has http://www.kdge.com/new2/artists/i/330338?psid=455422 a single song on a single station's radio rotation. She has a http://names.whitepages.com/amanda/hatcher common name, so one must husk the chaff from the wheat online. She's |up and coming, but she hasn't made it yet Deletion of Amanda Hatcher WP:CRYSTAL||WP:UPANDCOMING Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5367 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homeless women in the United States User:Snotbot 17:08, 2 April 2012 (UTC) comment This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (|step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 April 2 Deletion of Homeless women in the United States WP:AFDHOWTO Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +5368 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Coast Avengers User:Subwayatrain 15:51, 26 August 2008 (UTC) delete The song may be notable for its controversy at the present, but the group itself fails to meet . The content related to the controversial song could be merged into another article such as Bill_O'Reilly_(commentator), but only if the controversy of the song persists, which is doubtful Deletion of East Coast Avengers WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5369 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James T. White User:Qworty 09:55, 28 November 2012 (UTC) delete per Deletion of James T. White WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +5370 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Cormack (2nd nomination) User:Alexandermcnabb 10:19, 1 June 2021 (UTC) delete No sources presented in article, none immediately found online. Fails . Best Deletion of Ben Cormack (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5371 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dom Dwyer User:Mattythewhite 17:16, 25 March 2012 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Dom Dwyer WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5372 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vecino (disambiguation) User:Jovanmilic97 17:13, 5 October 2019 (UTC) keep """It has 4 entries now that were found in less than 5 minutes of a search. A valid by the surname. We can even add Vecinos entries (since """"vecino"""" means a neighbor, and """"vecinos"""" means neighbors) like Vecinos (which possibly needs to move to Vecinos (Mexican TV series) in my opinion), Vecinos (Colombian TV series), Vecinos, Salamanca, and Ramón Vecinos""" Deletion of Vecino (disambiguation) WP:DAB Wikipedia:Disambiguation 64 +5373 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anime Warriors! User:Kinu 04:21, 2 August 2006 (UTC) delete blatantly non-notable fan fiction, fails , for its website, for any of its claims of importance Deletion of Anime Warriors! WP:FICT||WP:WEB||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5374 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purple diet User:MastCell 22:36, 7 July 2007 (UTC) comment Is it a |notable aspect of Mariah Carey's biography, though Deletion of Purple diet WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5375 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amrish Ranjan Pandey User:Grailcombs 16:54, 11 March 2021 (UTC) delete Present amount of sources are not enough to meet Deletion of Amrish Ranjan Pandey WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5376 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brightpod User:Kvng 14:54, 11 August 2016 (UTC) keep """Significant coverage in cited reliable sources. The relevant definition for significant coverage is and this is clearly met. """"Insufficient coverage to sustain an encyclopedia entry"""" is a subjective assessment and not a valid -REASON. Other delete comments are also |not compelling""" Deletion of Brightpod WP:SIGCOV||WP:DEL||WP:JNN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5377 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bahamas–Russia relations User:Johnuniq 03:37, 4 June 2009 (UTC) delete Article has no useful content. No sources discuss these relations. Fails |notability Deletion of Bahamas–Russia relations WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5378 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Michael Lacey (2nd nomination) User:Whpq 14:18, 7 April 2008 (UTC) comment shouldn't this really have been submitted to |Deletion Review Deletion of Aaron Michael Lacey (2nd nomination) WP:DRV Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +5379 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of regular expression software User:Rhododendrites 23:04, 22 August 2016 (UTC) delete """When I first noticed this nomination I figured """"regular expression software"""" must be a type of program for, say, assisting with regular expressions. But it looks to be a list of software that supports regular expressions. That seems |indiscriminate, and we would need to see some reliable sources which treat them as a group to establish . I'm not seeing that. &mdash""" Deletion of List of regular expression software WP:IINFO||WP:LISTN Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5380 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Taylor polyhedra User:DeVerm 20:51, 12 June 2016 (UTC) delete Article does not pass . {{ping|Polystar}} you can go to to read the guideline on sourcing. You need secondary, reliable sources in addition to your primary sources Deletion of List of Taylor polyhedra WP:GNG||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5381 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tres Watson (2nd nomination) User:Mackensen 13:20, 19 March 2017 (UTC) delete Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Doesn't pass Deletion of Tres Watson (2nd nomination) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5382 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nayaki NONE NONE keep per filming having begun and topic of film's MOS:FILM#Production|production meeting | (paragraph 3), IE Deletion of Nayaki WP:NFF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5383 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven M. Greer User:SheffieldSteel 21:24, 2 June 2008 (UTC) delete I'm tempted to suggest BLP1E applies, but the subject might not agree with me, so I'll stick with the basics. This person is not |notable enough for an encyclopaedic article to be written, in that multiple non-trivial mentions in independent |reliable sources have not been provided to satisfy our |verifiability policy. The sources that are present are mainly self-published and/or faith-based (to whatever extent). The archived OMNI piece is the best source provided, but even that provides essentially no biographical information. There really is very little salvageable material in the article as written Deletion of Steven M. Greer WP:N||WP:RS||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5384 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fort not Portland NONE NONE keep I am the original author of this article. I am new to wikipedia, but trying to catch up. As I understand it, my page has been marked for deletion under Deletion of Fort not Portland WP:VAIN Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +5385 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oracle Advertising and Customer Experience (CX) User:Heartmusic678 15:18, 19 August 2021 (UTC) keep CX passes . It is one of several of Oracle's SaaS enterprising apps, all of which have their own page, as adding their individual info to Oracle would make that page unwieldy. Per , if a company is notable (as is Oracle), information on its products and services should generally be included in the article on the company itself, unless the company article is so large that this would make the article unwieldy. Here are more sources: https://www.forbes.com/sites/patrickmoorhead/2021/05/17/oracle-updates-advertising-and-customer-experience-applications/?sh=2e9c0b5f1bc2, https://www.forbes.com/sites/oracle/2020/11/13/larry-ellison-discusses-the-future-of-office-work-and-integrated-applications/?sh=188c96762483, https://www.forbes.com/sites/moorinsights/2020/09/30/oracle-doubles-down-on-customer-experience-cx-management-with-new-zoom-integration/?sh=773c3e7571c4, https://www.google.com/books/edition/Oracle_CX_Cloud_Suite/gc6PDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Oracle+Advertising+and+Customer+Experience+CX&printsec=frontcover Deletion of Oracle Advertising and Customer Experience (CX) WP:PRODUCT||WP:PRODUCT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5386 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamela Pendley Biggers User:Ironholds 05:55, 25 September 2009 (UTC) delete fails #NEWS and Deletion of Pamela Pendley Biggers WP:NOT||WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5387 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Dorri Nowkoorani User:Blue 18:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC) delete per nom. I can't find anything to show he passes Deletion of Ali Dorri Nowkoorani WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5388 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N-iX User:WikiDan61 16:34, 14 July 2016 (UTC) delete as |spam. Self-promotional and non-|notable Deletion of N-iX WP:SPAM||WP:ORG Wikipedia:Spam 26 +5389 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariam Khalique User:Pharaoh 15:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC) delete per nom and above Fails Deletion of Mariam Khalique WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5390 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ziwo yixiang User:Nsk92 12:25, 21 September 2008 (UTC) delete Fails and . Google turns up nothing relevant (certainly nothing that would pass ) except for a few wikipedia mirrors and clones. The article is 4 years old and still no improvements and no references found Deletion of Ziwo yixiang WP:V||WP:OR||WP:RS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5391 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich Zubaty User:Cunard 02:02, 13 May 2010 (UTC) delete per the http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-press+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Rich+Zubaty%22 lack of sufficient coverage in |reliable sources. This article fails Wikipedia:Notability (biographies), Wikipedia:Verifiability, and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons Deletion of Rich Zubaty WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5392 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Chacon (2nd nomination) User:SheffieldSteel 20:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC) delete If Chacon has not been the subject of non-trivial coverage by independent |reliable sources, then there is no proof of |notability - and no way we can write an encyclopaedic article about him Deletion of Christopher Chacon (2nd nomination) WP:RS||WP:N Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5393 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yamie Chess User:Atlantic306 17:26, 21 November 2016 (UTC) delete does not pass as the independence of two of the given references has been questioned (see article talk page). I did deprod this but in view of the doubtful sources have changed opinion Deletion of Yamie Chess WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5394 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dave Jones Interval Averages (DJIA) User:Dhartung 06:14, 6 March 2008 (UTC) delete we have a word for what Canterbury Tail is trying to say -- |vanispamcruftisement -- and I haven't seen such an illustrative example in some time. It's not notable, so it's vanity. It's pumping a business, so it's spam. It goes into great unencyclopedic detail about whatever it is, so it's cruft. And it's soapboxing, hence advertisement Deletion of The Dave Jones Interval Averages (DJIA) WP:VSCA Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +5395 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragonmead User:ThaddeusB 15:48, 20 February 2015 (UTC) keep sufficient sourcing to establish notability under the |GNG. Also a Wp:trout|trouting is in order for an inappropriate use use speedy deletion by RHaworth - there were many past revisions without the slightest hint of promotionalism. Can I get any article I want speedy deleted by dumping promotional text into it now? Additionally, speedy deletion is only for unambiguous advertising, not mere promotional language, and the text and the time of deletion did not meet that Deletion of Dragonmead WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5396 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le bal des actrices User:MichaelQSchmidt 22:44, 3 September 2008 (UTC) keep per and . Article needs major expansion, but film is getting international coverage. The notability is there. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Le+bal+des+actrices&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq= Google search brings up http://www.premiere.fr/film/le-bal-des-actrices__1 premiere.fr, http://movies.uk.msn.com/film.aspx?P_MediaID=36993 MSN (UK) Complete cast list, http://www.unifrance.org/film/28484/le-bal-des-actrices unifrance.org, http://www.screenrush.co.uk/film/fichefilm_gen_cfilm=128873.html Screenrush (UK) Production year 2007, http://us.cinemotions.com/modules/Films/fiche/31297/Le-Bal-des-actrices.html cinemotions.com, http://www.allocine.fr/film/fichefilm_gen_cfilm=128873.html Allcine (FR) Complete cast/production info, http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x3eosz_le-bal-des-actrices Dailymotion film's trailer, http://dvdtoile.com/Film.php?id=48330 dvdtoile.com, and more. Wish I could read French Deletion of Le bal des actrices WP:GNG||WP:NF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5397 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Lee (businessman) User:Sambhil32 19:57, 12 January 2020 (UTC) keep per . Significant coverage in independent reliable sources exist Deletion of Ben Lee (businessman) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5398 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of idioms in the English language (A) User:Recury 14:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC) delete obviously violates Deletion of List of idioms in the English language (A) WP:WINAD Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +5399 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Reformation (band) (2nd nomination) User:Wikitam331 19:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC) keep Artist pages have at least five non-trivial, published works that provide substantial coverage that appears in sources that are reliable, not-self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself. Article was unsalted because deleting admin agreed that the additional four new sources are sufficient to establish notability per Deletion of The Reformation (band) (2nd nomination) WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5400 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burying the lead User:Shreevatsa 14:26, 26 March 2009 (UTC) delete """per . I would say """"merge into News style"""", but there isn't anything worth merging""" Deletion of Burying the lead WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +5401 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Da Governor User:NeemNarduni2 06:16, 22 January 2016 (UTC) delete """fails . This article was speedied A7 yesterday: it was a hoax pastiche of Samini and Stonebwoy. This time he's gathered some references that actually mention him, but per nomination, nothing from secondary . Infobox currently states ''""""Associated acts: Samini, Stonebwoy, Kaakie, Busy Signal, Chronixx, Bob Marley.""""'' Born in 1988, and associated with Bob Marley,? How""" Deletion of Da Governor WP:MUSICBIO||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5402 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nguyễn Công Phượng User:GiantSnowman 08:42, 14 September 2014 (UTC) delete fails (no appearances confirmed by http://uk.soccerway.com/players/cong-phuong-nguyen/352987/ Soccerway) and Deletion of Nguyễn Công Phượng WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5403 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Management Information Systems Association User:Chaser 06:08, 15 July 2006 (UTC) delete Student clubs and organizations are not notable. FYI: is a proposed guideline Deletion of Management Information Systems Association WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5404 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 United States tomato shortage User:Smartse 23:50, 20 October 2010 (UTC) keep there has been significant and lasting coverage to satisfy the and . The article could be renamed tomato shortage and broadened (I've found that there is currently a shortage in http://www.globes.co.il/serveen/globes/docview.asp?did=1000595135&fid=1725 Israel and http://www.freshplaza.com/news_detail.asp?id=69927 Jordan). As a the most popular vegetable (see the WSJ source) a shortage of tomatoes is a relatively big deal Deletion of 2010 United States tomato shortage WP:GNG||WP:EVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5405 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Saffron Swastika NONE NONE delete against ,also seems heavily dependent on qoutation by one news against wiki:NEWS Deletion of The Saffron Swastika WP:BKCRIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5406 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranveer Allahbadia User:Epinoia 02:24, 9 May 2019 (UTC) delete """promotional article, """"trained so many celebities"""" - does not meet - not notable by any criteria""" Deletion of Ranveer Allahbadia WP:NOTPROMOTION||WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5407 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeitgeist: Moving Forward User:MichaelQSchmidt 08:57, 7 March 2011 (UTC) keep per having |sourcable independent |notability meeting . We do not need to agree to the subject matter, as |our inclusion threshold is verifiability, not truth... and independent notability is independent notability. Or will the next such AFD suggest that ''Rocky 2'', ''Rocky 3'', ''Rocky 4'' etal should all be merged and redirected to ''Rocky 1 Deletion of Zeitgeist: Moving Forward WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:NF||WP:V Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5408 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theneworiginals001 User:Accounting4Taste 04:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC) delete If it's not even very popular on YouTube, it can't possibly have enough otable|notability for Wikipedia. No sources/references Deletion of Theneworiginals001 WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5409 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of gay beaches in France User:Wikimandia 19:51, 12 June 2015 (UTC) delete per nom, also those beaches have not self-identified as gay in Deletion of List of gay beaches in France WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5410 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 North American spring User:Dodger67 14:18, 25 October 2016 (UTC) delete per and . There's nothing ''per se'' peculiar or special about any given spring season on any given continent. Notable meterological events are covered in the respective tornado and hurricane season articles, which are part of long established and organized article series Deletion of 2016 North American spring WP:SYNTH||WP:N Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5411 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Curtis Brown User:GoldenAgeFan1 12:32, 9 April 2020 (UTC) keep The subject's 56-episode stint in ''Search for Tomorrow'', his recurring roles in various TV series and his film appearances are sufficient for the purposes of . The sources that Deletion of Robert Curtis Brown WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5412 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ha Sha User:Discospinster 23:48, 3 May 2006 (UTC) delete The very definition of Deletion of Ha Sha WP:NFT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day 88 +5413 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gateway Center (Wenatchee) User:Oakshade 21:25, 16 December 2010 (UTC) delete I'm just not finding anything even close to significant in terms of coverage or passing even the most liberal interpretation of Deletion of Gateway Center (Wenatchee) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5414 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatima de Madrid User:Amatulic 20:17, 5 October 2011 (UTC) comment """It occurs to me that sources are likely to be non-electronic and non-English. Possibly Spanish or Arabic. Also, it isn't exactly true that |significant coverage of the subject is the only criterion that matters for notability. From Wikipedia:Notability (people), a scholar can be notable without her biography being the subject of secondary sources. She would be notable if she has made a widely recognized contribution to astronomy, or originated a significant new concept or discovery. Note that the concept or discovery is the notable thing that receives coverage, not necessarily the person; this is a possible exception to . Simply """"being an 11th century female Muslim astronomer"""" isn't really a good claim, although Wikipedia:Notability (academics) suggests that she'd be notable if sources make note of the rarity of female astronomers in her time — and it would be surprising if no source made note of this fact. Whether such sources exist is another matter. Anyone know how to spell her name in Arabic""" Deletion of Fatima de Madrid WP:SIGCOV||WP:NOTINHERITED Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5415 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James K Baker User:David 20:53, 1 July 2010 (UTC) keep Google scholar http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=author:j-baker+-author:jm-baker+-author:ja-baker+speech+-tinnitis+-sleep+-telomere&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2001&as_ylo=&as_vis=0 shows heavy citation counts (over 350) both for his Dragon system and for his paper on trainable grammars. The search results are messy but his h-index appears to be around 15 or 16. It's enough to convince me of a pass of #C1 and also enough to convince me that he's known for more than just one thing Deletion of James K Baker WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5416 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Copeland (Photographer) User:Narky 09:42, 30 May 2017 (UTC) delete I could find nothing in the citations other than brief mentions or acknowledgments. A search turned up no independent coverage. I found CC's http://www.imdb.com/name/nm8495016/ IMDb entry (non-), but can see no evidence of notability in it. Fails ; and at best Deletion of Chad Copeland (Photographer) WP:RS||WP:BIO||WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5417 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live from London (iTunes) User:Esradekan 21:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC) delete fails notability per #Albums. No significant coverage in |reliable, third-party, sources. A passing mention on each of the artists parent article is all that is required, if that. No notability for a stand alone article Deletion of Live from London (iTunes) WP:MUSIC||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5418 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RuneScape armour User:Poorleno 23:05, 24 June 2006 (UTC) keep """Hardly gets mentioned in main article, as the purpose of this page was to shorten RuneScape and an article on a ''MAJOR'' section of the game hardly qualifies as as """"Game Guide"""", therefor, Doesn't apply. Really no problem with it whatsoever, and if you have a problem with this statement, rant on""" Deletion of RuneScape armour WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5419 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pepper the westie User:Athomeinkobe 00:28, 18 March 2016 (UTC) delete the only independent coverage I can find is http://www.couriermail.com.au/questnews/southeast/wynnum-westies-garner-thousands-of-loyal-fans-on-facebook/news-story/12a45887b92584daf318d2d5bd9572fe this 8-sentence story from June 2015. The bar must be higher than this Deletion of Pepper the westie WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5420 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kissmetrics User:Safehaven86 17:44, 26 September 2016 (UTC) keep per sourcing listed above by NorthAmerica, this company meets Deletion of Kissmetrics WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5421 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Fenton (ice hockey) User:Ravenswing 04:29, 23 December 2010 (UTC) delete """I would say that """"we generally take the same stance here"""" is a little on the mild side; the NHL is the sole arbiter of who counts as playing in an NHL game or not, and the NHL rule is that you have to take the ice to be counted as having played. Goalies on emergency fill-in ATOs happen every year or so, in similar circumstances; heck, having been a season-ticket holder in Springfield for years, I can recall at least three instances where an AIC goalie sat on the bench. Absolutely a """ Deletion of Tom Fenton (ice hockey) WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +5422 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corticon User:Bearian 15:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC) delete per - it's all dead links and blogs Deletion of Corticon WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5423 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Safari Ltd User:Johnuniq 10:45, 13 June 2009 (UTC) delete No way to make an article out of this advert. Fails Deletion of Safari Ltd WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5424 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debórah Dwork User:David 21:56, 13 July 2017 (UTC) keep Along with the clear pass of already demonstrated above, she passes for her heavily reviewed and adapted books. I just added ten book reviews as sources to the article, and that was only for her first two books Deletion of Debórah Dwork WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5425 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human photosynthesis User:McGeddon 11:32, 3 October 2015 (UTC) delete """as human ; the only sources that deal with the subject directly are papers from the Human Photosynthesis Study Center (whose website will sell you a box of """"QIAPI 1"""" photosynthesis pills for $55), the other two refer to related melanin processes without going so far as calling it """"photosynthesis"""". The rest seems ; concluding that a long-distance swimmer was possibly photosynthesing because they had a suntan is ridiculous. There may be an article to be written about fringe theories of human photosynthesis, but not with any of this content""" Deletion of Human photosynthesis WP:SYN||WP:PRIMARY||WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5426 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Gardner User:Thebainer 07:03, 19 January 2006 (UTC) delete """The only criteria that comes close is """"Persons achieving renown or notoriety for their involvement in newsworthy events"""", which is so nebulous as to be almost useless. Notoriety within the WP world yes, in teh real world? Methinks not""" Deletion of Joshua Gardner WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5427 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Losseny Doumbia User:Wikicology 22:43, 1 October 2014 (UTC) keep subject of the article obviously meet . I understand that the article needs much work but the subject meet Deletion of Losseny Doumbia WP:NSOCCER||WP:SPORTCRIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5428 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellis, Idaho User:Firsfron 20:52, 30 June 2021 (UTC) keep """The USGS lists Ellis as a https://geonames.usgs.gov/apex/f?p=138:3:::NO:3:P3_FID,P3_TITLE:381426,Ellis populated place and my 1960 World Book Encyclopedia lists Ellis as a town with a population of 10, while Davis' Encyclopedia from 1909 gives it a population of 20. is thus satisfied: """"Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low. Even abandoned places can be notable, because notability encompasses their entire history."""" It does seem as though Ellis is abandoned, but |notability is not temporary. I was able to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ellis%2C_Idaho&type=revision&diff=1031293594&oldid=1030974087 expand the article, using serious reference works. It would be quite odd to delete the info here, while reference works like ''World Book'' and ''Davis' Encyclopedia'' have noted the community. What are we doing deleting content other encyclopedias contain""" Deletion of Ellis, Idaho WP:GEOLAND||WP:NOTTEMP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5429 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valeria Lukyanova (2nd nomination) User:Viticulturist99 12:29, 12 September 2013 (UTC) delete Indeed, there are scores of models, or rather media attention seekers, and not even half of them are notable. She fails , and Deletion of Valeria Lukyanova (2nd nomination) WP:BLP1E||WP:GNG||WP:ACADEMIC Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +5430 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I sucked a lot of cock to get where I am User:Newsaholic 07:35, 21 October 2008 (UTC) merge per to Tu-Plang|the album containing the song as a plausible typo for the correct capitalization Deletion of I sucked a lot of cock to get where I am WP:NALBUMS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5431 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barack Obama's first 100 days User:Grsz11 19:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC) delete a major violation Deletion of Barack Obama's first 100 days WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5432 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronald Presley User:AlwaysOnion 08:31, 16 October 2008 (UTC) delete Non-notable, and | Wikipedia is not myspace, facebook, a fan gathering site, webhost Deletion of Ronald Presley WP:MUSIC||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5433 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim Action Committee User:Batard0 14:24, 25 October 2012 (UTC) merge to Mohammed cartoons. There were three or four BBC articles around the time of the controversy, when this group was organizing protests, but there's no evidence of a single drop of coverage outside of that. What this amounts to is essentially news that took place around these protests; but . It may warrant a sentence or two in the article about the controversy, however, since there clearly was significant coverage Deletion of Muslim Action Committee WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5434 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. D. Williams Engineering crashes User:MilborneOne 18:32, 15 September 2008 (UTC) delete two non-notable accidents, only link between company is that both aircraft had employees involved. Some information could be salvaged into a company article if the company was notable enough for its own article although nothing in the article mentions the effect on the company other that to act as a |memorial Deletion of A. D. Williams Engineering crashes WP:NOTMEMORIAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5435 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prashanth Chandrasekar User:Kashmorwiki 16:57, 15 April 2021 (UTC) comment u|Nomadicghumakkad}}, thats a good question to ask. While I dont have a clear answer for you, let me tell you one thing. Im also an AFC reviewer. When I have to review some articles where notability can be questioned in future, I only accept those articles which have a greater chance for survival at AFD. I even do a efore from my side to double check whether any other sources are also available. Because I really dont want my genuinity to be questioned by other users. I still wonder why this article was accepted. None of the sources are not giving enough sigcov to the subject from my opinion. Forbes article is actually giving more importance to some other event rather than the subject. Other two are also not enough to establish GNG even if we combine them all. Moreover, this is an article with 5 sentences, which does not give the readers an idea about the subject. Leave the part about notability, but I believe this should have been declined at AFC with atleast giving the reason ''submission provides insufficient context'' Pinging the reviwer {{u|Dial911}} for a clarification from their side. May be Im wrong here. Regards Deletion of Prashanth Chandrasekar WP:B Wikipedia:Bots 91 +5436 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Wales (actor) User:Jersey92 17:15, 3 July 2014 (UTC) delete Fails . Maybe . Either way, delete for now Deletion of Gary Wales (actor) WP:ENT||WP:NYA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5437 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helen Gloag User:MichaelQSchmidt 19:28, 23 June 2009 (UTC) keep as article is now properly expanded and sourced per Deletion of Helen Gloag WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +5438 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adminsoft Accounts User:Whpq NONE delete There is no significant coverage in |reliable sources to meet Wikipedia's |inclusion criteria. The sourcing in the article do not represent reliable sources and the closest thing I could find was this http://www.thehindu.com/business/companies/article1536533.ece passing mention in The Hindu Deletion of Adminsoft Accounts WP:RS||WP:N Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5439 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shalwan Pora User:Anupmehra 11:19, 8 November 2016 (UTC) keep Legally recognised populated villages should be kept per . Content issues can be fixed by editing the article or discussing it on article's talk page Deletion of Shalwan Pora WP:GEOLAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5440 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultured resonance User:Jreferee NONE delete No indications that this term is notable. Only two sources cited, both the work of one author. The current article text says that the term was first used in 2010. Google searches return only the works of this author, and completely unrelated hits, largely describing a tone of voice. This is a non-notable neologism at best, and as per does not belong here, at worst it is attempted promotion. I agree with Deletion of Cultured resonance WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5441 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 in Ghana User:Ultraexactzz 14:40, 13 March 2013 (UTC) delete as per nom. Few indeed are the events that we know with certainty will happen that far in advance. If we get one of those, sure - but anything else is just Deletion of 2016 in Ghana WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5442 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Brown (accused murderer) User:Racklever 15:44, 25 January 2011 (UTC) keep The person is notable as their case has been mentioned in many newspapers. Deletion of Jordan Brown (accused murderer) WP:COMMONSENSE "Wikipedia:What ""Ignore all rules"" means" 27 +5443 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shailesh Gupta User:Pharaoh 15:22, 30 July 2016 (UTC) delete per Bearian, Fails Deletion of Shailesh Gupta WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5444 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Potter music (2nd nomination) User:Le 16:57, 7 August 2008 (UTC) keep due to clear and overwhelming consensus in previous AfD and because is never a valid argument for deletion. Also, we don't merge and delete per the Wikipedia:Merge and delete|GFDL. --Happy editing! Sincerely Deletion of Harry Potter music (2nd nomination) WP:ITSCRUFT Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +5445 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dopamine (band) User:Yamaguchi先生 08:23, 29 June 2006 (UTC) keep per comments above, meets guideline Deletion of Dopamine (band) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5446 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M4 (Star Trek) User:Carlossuarez46 21:38, 9 May 2007 (UTC) delete per nom & per , if it belongs in the Requiem... put it there Deletion of M4 (Star Trek) WP:FICT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5447 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WISEPC J234841.10-102844.4 User:David 00:45, 21 March 2013 (UTC) delete for lack of the independent nontrivial coverage required by Deletion of WISEPC J234841.10-102844.4 WP:NASTRO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5448 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Lu User:Crusio 08:32, 26 February 2009 (UTC) keep """per John Z. Postdocs are almost never notable, I guess this is the exception that confirms the rule. Publication and citation record is perhaps not yet up to , but the third-party coverage is enough to satisfy . The article needs cleanup, though (remarks like """"unprecedented success"""", """"landmark paper""""). The article history is weird, with quite a lot of vandalism, so the article should be watchlisted by several people after cleanup to keep it in a decent state""" Deletion of Peter Lu WP:ACADEMIC||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5449 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herr beach User:Guliolopez 16:01, 22 May 2017 (UTC) delete """per nom. doesn't seem to be met. also a significant concern. (A Google search for https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Herr+beach%22+louth """"herr beach"""" louth or https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Herr+beach%22+blackrock """"herr beach"""" blackrock returns zero results""" Deletion of Herr beach WP:NGEO||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5450 """Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aja Watkins a.k.a """"Beautiful""""""" User:Kinu 04:25, 21 December 2006 (UTC) delete """a.k.a """"fails """". Possibly a speedy candidate due to the repeated blanking by the author (although I've restored the article, with the AfD template, per procedure""" """Deletion of Aja Watkins a.k.a """"Beautiful""""""" WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5451 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kasia Al Thani (2nd nomination) User:Hongkongresident 07:32, 22 October 2010 (UTC) merge to Abdelaziz bin Khalifa Al Thani, due to #Family. There are a few sources specificially about her and a defunct business she started, but not enough to merit a separate article Deletion of Kasia Al Thani (2nd nomination) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5452 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobispine User:Ifnord 05:14, 22 November 2018 (UTC) delete per nom for failing . There's no claim to notability in the article Deletion of Mobispine WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5453 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mecha as Practical War Machines (second nomination) User:Jeepday 03:31, 8 February 2007 (UTC) delete WP:OR and speculation. also fails Deletion of Mecha as Practical War Machines (second nomination) WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5454 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kill the Commie Bastards! User:Chetsford 20:38, 7 March 2020 (UTC) delete insufficient RS to demonstrate Deletion of Kill the Commie Bastards! WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5455 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Pamphile User:Ejgreen77 21:25, 22 June 2014 (UTC) keep All of the nominations by this particular nominator appear to be based on a misunderstanding of how and work together. trumps all other WikiProject-specific notability guidelines Deletion of Kevin Pamphile WP:GNG||WP:NGRIDIRON||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5456 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Main Political Council User:Spinningspark 17:13, 24 August 2018 (UTC) keep """There is a fair amount of coverage in multiple books, https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=w4dsCQAAQBAJ&pg=PA49&dq=Główna+Rada+Polityczna ''The Polish Underground and the Jews, 1939–1945'' for instance. I would not oppose a merge given the current undeveloped state of both articles, but either way, the information should be kept per . By the way, a more common English translation in sources of ''Główna Rada Polityczna'' is """"Chief Political Council"""" which may help in searches. Also, the council is also known as ''Rada Główna Obrony Narodowej'' (""""Main National Defense Council""" Deletion of Main Political Council WP:PRESERVE Wikipedia:Editing policy 24 +5457 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vatula User:Sitush 12:16, 20 June 2016 (UTC) delete as fails and is a . I have removed one source (Rediff) because it is a mirror of Wikipedia. The others do not discuss it in depth and are basically definitions Deletion of Vatula WP:GNG||WP:DICDEF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5458 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finduilas of Dol Amroth User:Hog 18:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC) delete Minor character and not a likely search term. Fails Deletion of Finduilas of Dol Amroth WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5459 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikos Stylos NONE NONE keep this is a AfD, mainly because the person is a Cham Albanian, a minority group of Greece. He has been interviewed by Shekulli, a newspaper widely circulated newspaper of Albania and one of the 3 largest Albanian newspapershttp://www.peshkupauje.com/2009/12/profesor-niko-stillo-ne-greqi-ka-70-mije. In Albanian national television TVSH there has been a program about him http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LL1rKn5Kxd4http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWBvG5OfeFkhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfbqBug_Qnw. Members of the Albanian Academy of Sciences have examined, peer-reviewed and written about him and his works Deletion of Nikos Stylos WP:IDONTLIKEIT Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +5460 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fetu User:Bearian 15:22, 29 June 2021 (UTC) delete as a or redirect Deletion of Fetu WP:DICDEF Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +5461 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ukrainian Artists Society of Australia User:Duffbeerforme 08:09, 9 February 2011 (UTC) delete """WP:OR|Original research |promoting the organisation, two things that Wikipedia |is not. Also from Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies), """"The source's audience must also be considered. Evidence of attention by international or national, or at least regional, media is a strong indication of notability. On the other hand, attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability; at least one regional, national, or international source is necessary""" Deletion of Ukrainian Artists Society of Australia WP:SPAM||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Spam 26 +5462 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Number One (Babylon 5) User:Sgeureka 08:42, 11 November 2019 (UTC) merge """to List of Babylon 5 characters, which didn't follow . This recurring character should be covered ''somewhere''. There is even some real-world info (""""Getting the role"""" section), but it's not expansive enough to justify a separate article. &ndash""" Deletion of Number One (Babylon 5) WP:SUMMARY Wikipedia:Summary style 23 +5463 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tie Break (jazz ensemble) User:Alzarian16 12:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC) keep The coverage found appears to be just enough for the group to meet Deletion of Tie Break (jazz ensemble) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5464 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stable Isotope Foundation User:Ihcoyc 14:39, 24 July 2008 (UTC) delete agree with all above, and articles that contain text arguing their subject's notability seem to be |self-referential in a sense, as well as clutching at straws Deletion of Stable Isotope Foundation WP:SELF Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +5465 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doris Egbring-Kahn (2nd nomination) User:Northamerica1000 04:40, 3 January 2017 (UTC) comment """Actually, the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doris Egbring-Kahn|previous AfD discussion had two participants other than from the nominator, but after two relistings, the overall input was inadequate for a consensus to be determined. This counters the notion of """"Complete lack of community interest confirms non-notability"""" stated in the nomination herein. Furthermore, lack of input at AfD discussions has no bearing whatsoever upon whether or not a topic is |notable""" Deletion of Doris Egbring-Kahn (2nd nomination) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5466 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gustavo Picone User:Papaursa 20:11, 18 January 2014 (UTC) delete No top tier fights and no significant coverage, so he doesn't meet or Deletion of Gustavo Picone WP:NMMA||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5467 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MidPhase User:Abecedare 21:32, 9 January 2009 (UTC) delete Fails . No secondary sources included in article or availble on google search Deletion of MidPhase WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5468 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billy Hallowell (2nd nomination) User:Rpclod 05:05, 27 June 2015 (UTC) delete seems somewhat self-promotional. Isn't writing some articles and interviewing some people what journalists are supposed to do? Nothing suggests notability Deletion of Billy Hallowell (2nd nomination) WP:JOURNALIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5469 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melinda Anderson User:Lankiveil 01:05, 29 May 2011 (UTC) delete doesn't appear to meet - only published work is a redlinked book that she collaborated with another on Deletion of Melinda Anderson WP:BK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5470 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IDF Tick Tock User:Lil 21:09, 20 July 2010 (UTC) keep precisely because it is |notable, it has received |extensive, worldwide coverage, and it is more than adequately |sourced. As for Deletion of IDF Tick Tock WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5471 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/100 Years (film) [[User talk:SummerPhDv2.0|v2.0]] 04:27, 9 March 2017 (UTC) keep 3.5 independent reliable sources say the film was made. The film passes and . - SummerPhD Deletion of 100 Years (film) WP:NFF||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5472 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cory Davenport User:Pharmboy 19:26, 18 October 2008 (UTC) delete """as G11. To quote the article: """"''Cory Davenport (1968-) is one of the most creative botanical designers of the recent decades''"""", and it gets worse. Barfing on |peacock feathers""" Deletion of Cory Davenport WP:peacock Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +5473 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/June 2010 West Bank shooting (2nd nomination) User:Tarc 13:59, 23 September 2010 (UTC) delete """just the same as AfD #1 which unfortunately was brought to DRV for """"I disagree with the result"""" reasons"""". This is WP:NOTNEWS|news, this is not a significant or historic event. Maybe it's a sad commentary on the state of world affairs that such attacks are considered almost routine news, but that's the way it is. The Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a vehicle to prop up importance of one's personal causes and interests. Elevating this |event to an article does exactly that. If appropriate, reuse/recycle some of the sources in a larger article on Israeli-Palestine conflicts""" Deletion of June 2010 West Bank shooting (2nd nomination) WP:EVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5474 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greece–Venezuela relations User:BlueSquadronRaven 22:57, 6 May 2009 (UTC) delete No secondary sources, no assertion of why this is a notable topic, nothing to back it up with. Fails miserably Deletion of Greece–Venezuela relations WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5475 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Athena School of Management User:Richigi 13:25, 2 December 2012 (UTC) delete Fails every measure of Deletion of Athena School of Management WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5476 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creature breeder User:Stifle 14:51, 8 July 2006 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Creature breeder WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5477 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magnus Böcker User:Cordless 17:31, 29 November 2016 (UTC) keep meets , with significant coverage in, amongst others, https://www.ft.com/content/d06dfb68-bc1a-11e4-a6d7-00144feab7de the FT, http://www.wsj.com/articles/singapore-exchange-ceo-to-leave-firm-1424784314 Wall Street Journal, http://www.forbes.com/2010/03/20/bocker-sgx-asia-intelligent-investing-singapore.html Forbes, and plenty of Swedish sources besides Deletion of Magnus Böcker WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5478 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antone Belt User:Kolma8 18:17, 4 December 2020 (UTC) delete lacks and little media coverage Deletion of Antone Belt WP:NTRACK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5479 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epsilon Iota Fraternity User:Truth 00:45, 26 July 2013 (UTC) delete Fails and alike. For what it's worth, the article has a balance problem and is poorly written too - it is not even clear what university(ies) this is about. But, no coverage anyway Deletion of Epsilon Iota Fraternity WP:ORG||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5480 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Re:sound User:Charlene 20:35, 9 March 2007 (UTC) delete There are no references given outside those associated with the program. If reliable third party sources are discussing this local radio program, and if those sources were identified and attributed, the article would be fine. As is it fails Deletion of Re:sound WP:ATT Wikipedia:Attribution 34 +5481 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost deer User:Rhododendrites 03:10, 23 August 2017 (UTC) delete """There are some ghits for """"ghost deer,"""" but there's not enough about ''this'' ghost deer to satisfy . &mdash""" Deletion of Ghost deer WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5482 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naraka: Bladepoint User:Haleth 12:15, 22 August 2021 (UTC) keep per . A convenient litmus test to determine whether a game is subject to enough significant coverage to meet is whether they have a Metacritic score, which requires a minimum of four reviews for each relevant platform. https://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/naraka-bladepoint/critic-reviews At the time of writing, it has ten reviews, five of which are from undisputedly reliable sources according to /RS. |Article content does not determine the notability of the subject Deletion of Naraka: Bladepoint WP:NEXIST||WP:GNG||WP:VG||WP:ARTN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5483 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kings of Chaos (game) User:Kyaa 14:20, 26 January 2009 (UTC) keep per the spirit of . There appears to have been some reporting on this, but at this time it is rather weak and sporadic. There is no deadline though and this may be a notable game, but the article requires work Deletion of Kings of Chaos (game) WP:PRESERVE Wikipedia:Editing policy 24 +5484 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Heard Stadium User:Livitup 18:14, 30 August 2013 (UTC) delete Constructed in 1976, so non-routine coverage predates Google, but searching revealed nothing except coverage of events being held there Deletion of Raymond Heard Stadium WP:ROUTINE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5485 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JJS Karate Dojo User:Eusebeus 23:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC) delete clearly fails Deletion of JJS Karate Dojo WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5486 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lila Rajiva (2nd nomination) NONE NONE keep per #People_still_alive Deletion of Lila Rajiva (2nd nomination) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5487 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of guidebooks about the Sierra Nevada User:Ohyeahmormons 17:13, 3 June 2008 (UTC) delete Wikipedia is not |a directory Deletion of List of guidebooks about the Sierra Nevada WP:NOTDIR Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5488 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aedin Adams User:Clarityfiend 23:09, 19 December 2013 (UTC) delete Two extra roles in films that haven't even been released yet and zero media notice? |WP:WAAAAAAAAAY TOOSOON Deletion of Aedin Adams WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +5489 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of Israel User:Snotbot 02:07, 21 February 2012 (UTC) comment This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (|step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 February 21 Deletion of Church of Israel WP:AFDHOWTO Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +5490 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future World Music User:James086 09:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC) delete I don't think it passes |company notability guideline so I'm also going to say delete. I also think there is a |conflict of interest due to the wording Deletion of Future World Music WP:CORP||WP:COI Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5491 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saumya Daan User:Chanderforyou 06:29, 23 January 2014 (UTC) delete as or Deletion of Saumya Daan WP:HOAX||WP:AUTOBIO Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes 40 +5492 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo Broch User:Fortuna 15:53, 29 April 2017 (UTC) keep plenty of coverage in https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Hugo+Broch+flying+ace&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=bbUEWf7mC8uOgAbt74qQBQ#tbm=bks&q=%22Hugo+Broch%22+flying+ace military / history texts; I agree that the sheer number of kills, relative to the theatre, conveys notability sufficient to pass and (arguably he 'played an important role in a significant military event') . &mdash Deletion of Hugo Broch WP:GNG||WP:MILPERSON Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5493 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galore Nation User:Gongshow 00:04, 6 January 2010 (UTC) delete WP:GNG is not met; no significant coverage found, and does not meet Deletion of Galore Nation WP:NALBUMS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5494 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred De Luca User:Doc 21:00, 29 May 2008 (UTC) keep Bad faith nom. Person meets as he founded one of Subway (restaurant)|the most successful resturant chains in the United States. Nom is trying to |make a point. Possibly someone connected to a competitor, like Shawn in Montreal mentioned Deletion of Fred De Luca WP:BIO||WP:POINT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5495 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powerpac International User:HighKing 15:40, 13 May 2017 (UTC) delete Fails and GNG Deletion of Powerpac International WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5496 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JoJo Ryder User:Trusilver 02:18, 28 September 2011 (UTC) delete fails . I found plenty of promotional material on him, but nothing that comes even close to establishing notability, and definitely no notable secondary sources Deletion of JoJo Ryder WP:CREATIVE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5497 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rolf Prima User:Rms125a 14:57, 29 May 2016 (UTC) delete fails but meets Deletion of Rolf Prima WP:GNG||WP:PROMO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5498 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1. What is JMS ? Why JMS ? User:Doc 21:58, 27 February 2009 (UTC) delete This reads like |someone's homework. Wikipedia is not for posting |essays Deletion of 1. What is JMS ? Why JMS ? WP:NOTWEBHOST||WP:NOTOR Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5499 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quizzaciously User:Ubiquity 16:18, 16 September 2015 (UTC) delete WP:NOTDIC. The math stuff makes it look like a candidate for Deletion of Quizzaciously WP:A11 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +5500 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Explosive Pro Wrestling User:AllynJ 05:00, 12 October 2007 (UTC) delete per & . http://www.abc.net.au/perth/stories/s1202102.htm This was the only |reliable source I could find on the topic, and it doesn't do anything to verify the contents of the article other than saying it exists. Considering the lack of ''multiple'' independent sources, fails on the notability front too Deletion of Explosive Pro Wrestling WP:V||WP:N||WP:RS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5501 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Sanoussi User:RayAYang 06:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC) delete It does look like a classic case of Deletion of Mohammed Sanoussi WP:ONEEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5502 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maximillian Bryant User:Lightdarkness 05:07, 22 February 2006 (UTC) delete NN-bio? Fails Deletion of Maximillian Bryant WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5503 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nico F. Declercq User:Mwelch 21:38, 12 April 2007 (UTC) keep The two papers mentioned in the article, on Chichen Itza and on Epidaurus, seem to be pretty widely reported and cited.http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%28%22nico+F.+declercq%22+OR+%22nico+declercq%22%29+%28pyramid+OR+Greek%29&btnG=Search Seems to meet #3 Deletion of Nico F. Declercq WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5504 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clare Venema User:Niteshift36 13:53, 9 July 2009 (UTC) delete Notability is really a matter of . If she gets notable later, it can be re-written Deletion of Clare Venema WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +5505 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Machin (2nd nomination) User:Wjemather 12:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC) merge to List of Bedfordshire County Cricket Club List A players. Reasonably long minor counties career including one List A match, but none of it equates to playing at the highest domestic level. No |significant coverage found, with mentions being almost exclusively scorecard data, so fails Deletion of Timothy Machin (2nd nomination) WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5506 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dike Eddleman Athlete of the Year User:Epinoia 04:14, 15 May 2019 (UTC) delete """the award is not mentioned on the University of Illinois website - I would recommend a Redirect, but the award is not mentioned in any of the University of Illinois campus articles - does not meet - has not """"received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject"""" - therefore, delete""" Deletion of Dike Eddleman Athlete of the Year WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5507 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole M. Christie User:Chiro725 16:19, 6 April 2021 (UTC) delete no way to save this article, lacks Deletion of Nicole M. Christie WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5508 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Gentile User:Johnuniq 08:12, 27 June 2009 (UTC) delete Article is just a promotion. No mentions the subject; fails Deletion of Richard Gentile WP:RS||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5509 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Better Place (David Campbell Album) User:Tavix 02:24, 3 April 2009 (UTC) delete per Deletion of A Better Place (David Campbell Album) WP:NALBUMS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5510 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manchester Rangers User:K 23:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC) delete a amateur club; no sources listed nor found to establish notability. What sources are there are local; not enough to meet Deletion of Manchester Rangers WP:AUD Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5511 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irving, Texas parking garage collapse User:Chrissymad 19:13, 31 July 2018 (UTC) delete or draftify - an experienced user should know better than to create an article in mainspace on the basis that it ''might'' become notable - do it in userspace and move it ''if'' it is a notable event. As it stands right now this is a violation of , and doesn't seem all that significant despite some coverage. I'd agree that this would be keep worthy if it were a historic event (ie. a flood) but it's not Deletion of Irving, Texas parking garage collapse WP:CRYSTALBALL||WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5512 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myra Nicholson User:Newshunter12 23:42, 18 November 2018 (UTC) delete """This article fails and because there is only sparse local coverage of her that fails to demonstrate notability and there is no notability guideline that the """"oldest X"""" is notable. The content of the article is routine trivia fancruft. She lived. She avoided the Reaper longer then most. She died. Pure . Her age, life dates, and nationality are already recorded on the List of supercentenarians by continent, where they are easier to view, so this permanent is not needed""" Deletion of Myra Nicholson WP:GNG||WP:BIO1E||WP:ROUTINE||WP:NOPAGE||WP:PERMASTUB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5513 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dani Gómez User:GiantSnowman 18:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Dani Gómez WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5514 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Functional Area 59 User:Anotherclown 07:56, 7 January 2011 (UTC) delete """non-notable organisational minutia IMO. A search of google books reveals very little, as does a web search. As such this subject seemingly lacks """"signficant independent coverage"""" in |reliable sources and therefore fails /N""" Deletion of Functional Area 59 WP:RS||WP:MILMOS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5515 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambridge University Wine Society User:MelanieN 04:25, 18 September 2010 (UTC) delete or '''Merge''' to List of social activities at the University of Cambridge. Is this club really 200+years old? If so, seems like it ought to have some real sourcing, but nothing at the article amounts to a Reliable Source. Google Books yields a mention or two http://books.google.com/books?id=y4udotMkzxgC&pg=PA21&dq=%22Cambridge+University+Wine+Society%22&hl=en&ei=iz2UTIeAFsKB8gbX3vGRDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDcQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false, but overall this student club fails despite its claimed age. While we're at it we should delete Oxford University Wine Society as well (a mere newcomer, founded in 1999 Deletion of Cambridge University Wine Society WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5516 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinosaur Adventure User:Marasmusine 14:38, 27 December 2009 (UTC) merge to Phoenix Games, per Deletion of Dinosaur Adventure WP:PRODUCT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5517 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ex-girlfriend fist User:Tnxman307 15:07, 10 June 2009 (UTC) delete It's a non-notable |neologism that appears to have been |made up one day Deletion of Ex-girlfriend fist WP:NEO||WP:MADEUP Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +5518 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Lynch User:GiantSnowman 17:27, 22 November 2009 (UTC) delete fails and ; recreate when and if any of these two concerns are met in the future Deletion of Chris Lynch WP:ATHLETE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5519 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playlist Tv NONE NONE delete """Delete as hoax. Article has been copied and tweaked from VH1 India (where Viacom and Zee-Turner ''did'' cooperate ref the The Financial Express (India)|Financial Express source and http://www.televisionpost.com/television/vh1s-10-year-journey-in-india/). No indications of """"Playlist"""" or """"Play List"""" in an Indian tv channel context""" Deletion of Playlist Tv WP:G3 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +5520 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Illinois Policy Institute User:SportingFlyer 12:23, 9 October 2018 (UTC) delete this is really badly source-bombed. It appears to fail - I've only looked at sources which appear to include the organisation in the article title, so I may have missed a few, since a cursory glance of the other sources doesn't suggest anything approaching notability, they're all on other topics or in some cases . I've also looked at the sources above and agree with HighKing. Also fails , and even if we somehow were to keep this, it almost certainly needs Deletion of Illinois Policy Institute WP:NCORP||WP:PRIMARY||WP:PROMO||WP:TNT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5521 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Gaetz sexual misconduct allegations User:Slywriter 01:51, 3 April 2021 (UTC) merge Majority of the article is about the extortion attempt. This is an article engaging in sensationalism as very few facts are available to actually cite about the allegations. Instead, you can already see the oatrack to tie this to Q, Roger Stone and Human Sex Trafficking Deletion of Matt Gaetz sexual misconduct allegations WP:C Wikipedia:Copyrights 60 +5522 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uchechukwu Otti User:Dom 19:56, 11 September 2020 (UTC) delete Falls far short of all criteria at Deletion of Uchechukwu Otti WP:NMUSICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5523 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gyidi User:Ampimd 22:30, 22 May 2021 (UTC) delete The singer doesn't meet the nor , the article stayed on for a long time without being seen as one that had failed all Deletion of Gyidi WP:MUSICBIO||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5524 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buttock Batu User:Dlthewave 12:42, 5 July 2021 (UTC) delete """Sourcing is insufficient to establish notability. I would challenge the assertion that this meets , since that guideline {{tq|""""specifically excludes maps, tables, lists, databases, etc., from consideration when establishing topic notability""""}} and the only current references are a list and a database""" Deletion of Buttock Batu WP:GEOLAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5525 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Scuro User:power 23:41, 29 January 2018 (UTC) delete doesn't appear to meet , which is the SNG that appears to be relevant. The article is a disaster and the only references (in a biography) are to scholarly papers by him and his associates Deletion of Pedro Scuro WP:NPROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5526 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Léo Costa (Musician) User:Catfish 08:53, 1 August 2013 (UTC) comment """I am extremely concerned at the level of |bad faith shown by some of our editors relating to this page. We are struggling with new editor retention and one sure fire way to scare them off is to hammer them and their articles with multiple warnings as soon as they put up their first articles. This article has been on Wikipedia for 2 days and has been subjected to two CSD nominations, neither of which were valid (A1, A7), had references removed to restore a BLP-PROD (!) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=L%C3%A9o_Costa_(Musician)&diff=566336727&oldid=566336668 and has been tagged as a hoax... when it's clear from a simple google search of """"Leo Costa Everlast"""" that he is indeed a professional drummer who has played with Everlast. Looking at the article, it's painfully obvious that it has been written by an inexperienced editor who doesn't know the ins and outs of WP policy. In situations like these, it is usually more appropriate to help to improve the article if possible and to provide mentorship, rather than ganging up on them and smacking them down for daring to write a WP article""" Deletion of Léo Costa (Musician) WP:FAITH Wikipedia:Assume good faith 53 +5527 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tonite Reprise User:Fuzzy510 07:08, 13 August 2007 (UTC) delete per nom. A straight failure of Deletion of Tonite Reprise WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5528 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qamar Shaheen Babur User:JFHJr 00:13, 14 December 2011 (UTC) delete As far as I can tell, this subject doesn't pass requirements of substantial coverage in reliable sources. Also as far as I can tell, this subject isn't the same person who worked for a competitor and received marginally more coverage as a victim of torture. At least I can't find any overt connection. Finally, assuming it is the same person, I'm not sure the incident is sufficient to support a stand-alone (see ). If someone can provide citations indicating the contrary, I'll be glad to change my !vote Deletion of Qamar Shaheen Babur WP:BASIC||WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5529 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akash Ambani User:FlyingBlueDream 09:26, 10 May 2018 (UTC) keep """Hi All! I believe that merely basing the discussion on the content only present on the article right now is not fair. A quick Google search tells me that he passes and through substantial mentions in a lot of verifiable publications, https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/307754 Entrepreneur, for instance, and others already on the page. GQ, who also featured him in a cover story, called him """"India's most influential young Indians"""" in 2017 (https://www.gqindia.com/content/gqs-most-influential-young-indians-2017-digital-disruptors/#akash-ambani here) while he is also credited for M&As and new ventures at his organization. He has also received coverage where the company he is heading strategy for, Jio has been in the news such as acquiring a music streaming system to create the largest streaming company in the subcontinent (https://www.businesstoday.in/current/corporate/reliance-jio-saavn-to-combine-forces-to-create-usd-1-billion-digital-music-platform/story/273297.html here) and venturing into blockchain (bit speculative: http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/jiocoin-reliance-planning-own-cryptocurrency-akash-ambani-to-lead-project-118011200346_1.html this and https://www.thequint.com/news/india/reliance-jio-to-venture-into-cryptocurrency-jiocoin-under-akash-ambani this). These are just some things that I found within a few minutes on Google search and as such he is definitely notable. Lastly, I also believe he satisfies through lines mentioned in the GQ and Entrepreneur articles. Some of these include - """"man behind Reliance’s open office culture and open collaboration framework"""" (Entrepreneur) and """"Ambani helped grow an initial 60-person team to a 17,000-strong workforce, achieving the goal of 100 million subscribers in just 170 days"""" (GQ). I strongly support keeping this page and do not agree with its deletion""" Deletion of Akash Ambani WP:BASIC||WP:GNG||WP:CCS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5530 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mexico–Serbia relations User:Marcusmax 00:05, 11 May 2009 (UTC) keep This article meets all the standards of a good Wikipedia article, referenced with multiple reliable sources and those who are not are referenced with secondary sources meet Deletion of Mexico–Serbia relations WP:PRIMARY Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5531 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reds Bagnell NONE 16:27, 23 June 2021 (UTC) keep clearly passes and . Nominator references but that's the other kind of football and doesn't apply Deletion of Reds Bagnell WP:GNG||WP:NGRIDIRON||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5532 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Chance (film) User:Lugnuts 17:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC) keep """Clearly this novice user has never read . This film will premiere in 7 days at one of the most notable film festivals. A quick Google search of the film title and either the director or """"star"""" show dozens and dozens of results, easily meeting . I've tried discussing this with this newbie, but they revert my edits on their talkpage. I don't understand the rationale for redirecting to Syco, whatever that is. Why not the director's page? Infact, no real rationale for |redirecting has been presented without discussion on the article's talkpage. I've gone to the effort of spending a few minutes of using Google, finding references and expanding the article. It's not that hard to do""" Deletion of One Chance (film) WP:BEFORE||WP:N||WP:DE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +5533 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shelly Glover User:Walton 19:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC) delete no evidence of multiple coverage in independent sources, so no proof of notability per . Delete unless sources can be found Deletion of Shelly Glover WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5534 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ole Miss - Notre Dame football series User:Ad 06:22, 6 March 2014 (UTC) delete The article doesn't seem to meet or . But that is mostly a lack of sources, not inherent non-notability. If someone can find some decent sources I would probably change my mind Deletion of Ole Miss - Notre Dame football series WP:SPORTSEVENT||WP:NRIVALRY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5535 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alleged Clinton Controversies User:AlexanderLevian 22:46, 28 July 2015 (UTC) delete There are no comparable articles for other past presidents. problems as well Deletion of Alleged Clinton Controversies WP:COAT Wikipedia:Coatrack articles 47 +5536 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marian Engineering College User:Nomadicghumakkad 04:07, 16 April 2021 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Marian Engineering College WP:ORG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5537 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babar Azam statistics in International Cricket User:Dmehus 14:47, 26 January 2020 (UTC) merge into Babar Azam per {{u|PenulisHantu}} and Draft:Babar Azam Statistics, per my comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Babar Azam Statistics. If these charts are already in Babar Azam and were created there ''first'', then '''delete''' is fine; however, if they were created in this article ''first'', requires us to preserve the |attribution history and merge Deletion of Babar Azam statistics in International Cricket WP:ATT||WP:ATT Wikipedia:Attribution 34 +5538 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capital Steez User:Gongshow 00:00, 24 October 2013 (UTC) keep A sampling of available material http://www.thefader.com/2012/02/27/video-joey-bada-f-capital-steez-survival-tactics/http://www.mtvhive.com/2012/09/12/capital-steez-free-the-robots-video/http://www.hiphopdx.com/index/album-reviews/id.1978/title.capital-steez-amerikkkan-korruption-reloaded-mixtape-reviewhttp://pitchfork.com/news/49008-joey-bada-collaborator-capital-steez-of-pro-era-has-died/http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1699408/capital-steez-remembered-pro-era.jhtmlhttp://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1705177/capital-steez-apex-video.jhtmlhttp://www.villagevoice.com/2013-04-17/music/the-sad-tale-of-beast-coast-architect-and-pro-era-emcee-capital-steez/http://www.xxlmag.com/news/2013/04/pro-eras-cj-fly-says-proceeds-from-capital-steezs-album-will-go-to-family/http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/the-juice/1568857/smth-capital-steez-last-straw-exclusive-song-premiere suggests that this artist had started to garner attention from notable sources prior to his death, and coverage for him has multiplied in subsequent months (not only in late December), enough to satisfy and Deletion of Capital Steez WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5539 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wheelie (Transformers) (2nd nomination) User:Snottywong 17:59, 31 August 2010 (UTC) delete Plenty of sources, except none of them are |reliable, and none of them establish the notability of this fictional character. Not notable enough for its own article. All of these transformers articles need to be merged into a list article Deletion of Wheelie (Transformers) (2nd nomination) WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5540 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksandra Alač User:Jack 01:47, 5 March 2017 (UTC) delete There is one source cited (IMDB) and no other reliable sources available (failing ). Based on those roles she has held, she does not meet the criteria in to justify the existence of an article. Does not otherwise meet . I cannot see any other justification to keep Deletion of Aleksandra Alač WP:NRV||WP:ENT||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5541 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mei Shigenobu NONE NONE comment Social activist? Author? Can you proove the otability of such achievements? Is she Deletion of Mei Shigenobu WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5542 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OILiQuidzz User:Stuartyeates 09:32, 7 October 2011 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of OILiQuidzz WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5543 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willow Ridge User:Black 07:17, 25 February 2007 (UTC) delete """per . A gang with 32,000 members and no sources (all ghits for '+""""Willow Ridge"""" +gang -Wikipedia' seem to be about places called Willow Ridge)? Also, they killed 79 people with only 72 bullets (was there a shortage of ammunition)? Can snipers even achieve this""" Deletion of Willow Ridge WP:HOAX Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes 40 +5544 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pakistani Nobel laureates User:Amorymeltzer 16:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC) keep This is — and the others are — eminently notable and definitively established by . There are a very limited number of potential lists like these (limited, albeit growing, number of countries and winners) and are absolutely bringing readers. ~ Amory Deletion of List of Pakistani Nobel laureates WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5545 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gey-freezing State Reserve [[User_talk:Rudget|Rudget]] [[Special:Contributions/Rudget|Contributions]] 19:01, 12 December 2007 (UTC) delete as hoax, can find no |reliable sourcing. &mdash Deletion of Gey-freezing State Reserve WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5546 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Aronsky User:David 19:11, 26 March 2015 (UTC) delete No evidence of passing nor any other notability criterion Deletion of Michael Aronsky WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5547 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chittagong City Center User:আফত 23:59, 1 August 2021 (UTC) delete per User:力, also there is no Deletion of Chittagong City Center WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5548 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Have Tourettes User:Esradekan 02:51, 21 August 2008 (UTC) merge back to Tila Tequila#Music career, where there is already a passing mention of the new album, until such time as it's release and/or decent references are found for it to pass #Albums Deletion of I Have Tourettes WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5549 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dino Govoni User:Erechtheus 21:07, 1 September 2006 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Dino Govoni WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5550 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill K. McNulty [[User talk:Albiet|Albiet]]'s claims) that McNulty was an exceptionally important one (academics, by their job description, write academic books and papers and this doesn't make them notable per se). NONE delete vote' as nominator (the author has expended thousands of words explaining their 'keep' vote so I think I need to make my position quite clear). Article fails the current Wikipedia |notability guidelines for judges and the news coverage about McNulty is fleeting, only brief mentions therefore failing criteria. Since http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jill_K._McNulty&diff=567033835&oldid=556098025 the AfD nomination, the article has been expanded greatly, unfortunately without any reliable proof of the increasingly exaggerated claims. Though McNulty worked as an acadmeic, I still fail to see any reliable secondary proof (other than Deletion of Jill K. McNulty WP:POLITICIAN||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5551 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Higher-Order Perl User:Northamerica1000 05:06, 3 May 2020 (UTC) keep Per a source review, it has been qualified that this book meets point #1 of Deletion of Higher-Order Perl WP:BOOKCRIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5552 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Iranian football clubs in 2010–11 season User:P199 19:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC) delete as per istcruft. Redundant Deletion of List of Iranian football clubs in 2010–11 season WP:L Wikipedia:Lists 36 +5553 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walmart greeter User:Notecardforfree 23:05, 27 May 2016 (UTC) merge """to greeting per . If someone feels ambitious enough to create an article about greeters, go right ahead, but until then we should make a sub-section at greeting about professional """"greeters""" Deletion of Walmart greeter WP:PAGEDECIDE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5554 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Comic Issue User:Kinu 05:00, 28 August 2006 (UTC) delete definitely some crazy form of and a how-to guide that isn't close to being encyclopedically relevant information. Yeah, thanks for telling me that Issue #2 comes after Issue #1 Deletion of A Comic Issue WP:OR||WP:NOT Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5555 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dre McFly User:Cocytus 05:13, 11 January 2010 (UTC) delete fails and is almost certainly a on some level Deletion of Dre McFly WP:MUSICBIO||WP:COI Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5556 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nike Davis User:Doc 16:50, 17 December 2006 (UTC) keep Seems to meet standards for ; notability is claimed and established Deletion of Nike Davis WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5557 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Mason User:SkierRMH 09:03, 29 December 2006 (UTC) delete per nom; Deletion of Aaron Mason WP:AUTO Wikipedia:Autobiography 75 +5558 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eliteanswers.com User:Fasach 10:02, 5 September 2008 (UTC) keep It seems to meet , I have tagged it as advert and for cleanup Deletion of Eliteanswers.com WP:NOTE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5559 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Belmar User:WilyD 15:34, 13 July 2006 (UTC) delete fails , and possibly Deletion of Adam Belmar WP:BIO||WP:VAIN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5560 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moglix User:Cunard 15:23, 8 November 2016 (UTC) keep The article needs a lot editing to make it encyclopedic and to conform it more closely with . It's not very good right now. That, however, is not a reason to delete it, at least not where the subject has been garnered |significant coverage in multiple, independent |reliable sources. Please note, the test is not whether the sources currently appear in the article; the test is whether they exist Deletion of Moglix WP:NPOV||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +5561 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeviceAtlas User:JJMC89 05:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC) delete The sources cited and others I could find are press releases/announcements, routine coverage, unreliable, and/or don't cover DeviceAtlas in-depth. is not satisfied. —&thinsp Deletion of DeviceAtlas WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5562 """Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scandals with """"-gate"""" suffix (2nd nomination)""" user:Andrew 07:21, 9 September 2017 (UTC) keep There's no case to answer -- see """Deletion of List of scandals with """"-gate"""" suffix (2nd nomination)""" WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +5563 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ginger tom User:Capitalistroadster 05:42, 28 May 2006 (UTC) delete Has released an EP but doesn't seem to have had much impact. No signs that they meet |our music notability guidelines Deletion of Ginger tom WP:NMG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5564 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Leigh Soto User:David 00:43, 1 January 2013 (UTC) merge per and (which applies regardless of BLP status Deletion of Victoria Leigh Soto WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BIO1E Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5565 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LouišP Ltd User:HighKing 21:24, 5 February 2017 (UTC) delete Fails and . Topic does not appear notable Deletion of LouišP Ltd WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5566 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Magennis User:Nfitz 18:22, 8 July 2008 (UTC) keep fails but meets with Belfast Telegraph coverage. I'd hardly call it a local paper, it can be found (not easily mind you) on the newstand in Canada, with the London papers, unlike what we normally call local papers Deletion of Josh Magennis WP:ATHLETE||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5567 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jazz Mellor (2nd nomination) User:AdventurousSquirrel 03:17, 3 February 2013 (UTC) delete coverage in national news sources, but as you say, not particularly substantially so. Probably fails Deletion of Jazz Mellor (2nd nomination) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5568 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Sheldon (writer) User:Chetsford 02:01, 9 February 2020 (UTC) delete insufficient sources demonstrated to pass Deletion of Lee Sheldon (writer) WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5569 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke (2009 film) User:Joe 21:32, 3 December 2009 (UTC) delete I can't find significant coverage for this |film Deletion of Luke (2009 film) WP:NF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5570 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Ciceri User:Lukeno94 09:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC) delete As per nom. Fails and . No substantial coverage in Deletion of Sebastian Ciceri WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5571 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pool Pros User:Akerans 18:43, 5 June 2010 (UTC) delete """per . 3 of 4 references used do not """"address the subject directly in detail."""" The 4th reference reads like a yellow pages ad, which does not make the subject notable""" Deletion of The Pool Pros WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5572 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sister Jean Dolores-Schmidt User:L293D 02:30, 27 March 2018 (UTC) keep enough s to assure notability Deletion of Sister Jean Dolores-Schmidt WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5573 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squirms User:Dacium 21:53, 15 February 2007 (UTC) delete Fails , not shown notibility Deletion of Squirms WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5574 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logan Martinez User:Bearcat 15:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC) delete As always, people do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in elections they did not win — to actually get a Wikipedia article, he would have to either (a) show that he had preexisting notability for other reasons, ''independently'' of the candidacy, that would already have gotten him into Wikipedia ''anyway'', or (b) show a credible and well-sourced reason why his candidacy should be deemed much ''more'' significant than most other people's candidacies, in some way that would pass the |ten year test for enduring significance. This demonstrates neither of those Deletion of Logan Martinez WP:10YT Wikipedia:Recentism 38 +5575 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Charnock User:GiantSnowman 16:56, 10 September 2017 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Nathan Charnock WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5576 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal User:Dragonfiend 17:57, 11 February 2006 (UTC) delete Does not meet Deletion of Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5577 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddie Pirkowski User:Corpx 02:22, 24 July 2007 (UTC) delete I think the person's historic notability could be in question here. He ran once for office and failed. I don't think that gives historic notability per #NEWS Deletion of Eddie Pirkowski WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5578 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of video game websites (2nd nomination) User:Northamerica1000 11:57, 2 January 2016 (UTC) keep """Qualifies for an article per relative to :Category:Video game websites, """"It is neither improper nor uncommon to simultaneously have a category, a list, and a navigation template which all cover the same topic. These redundant systems of organizing information are considered to be complementary, not inappropriately duplicative. Furthermore, arguing that a category duplicates a list (or vice versa) at a deletion discussion is not a valid reason for deletion and should be avoided."""" Also keep per , as having useful navigational functionality. Lastly, keep per , per the significant improvements the article has realized in being converted to a table format that has been expanded with more content by {{u|SharkD""" Deletion of List of video game websites (2nd nomination) WP:NOTDUP||WP:LISTPURP||WP:HEY Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates 5 +5579 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chili cheese burrito User:Dennisthe2 17:28, 10 June 2008 (UTC) delete Aside from the POV problem, I think I see a Deletion of Chili cheese burrito WP:COATRACK Wikipedia:Coatrack articles 47 +5580 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Makow User:Nsk92 02:53, 20 May 2008 (UTC) keep """I agree with the nom that the references listed in the article do not pass . However, there is some reasonably significant newscoverage by reliable sources. GoogleNews gives 46 hitshttp://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&lr=&tab=pn&q=%22Henry+Makow%22&ie=UTF-8, a decent number of which pass . E.g. New York Daily Newshttp://www.nydailynews.com/archives/lifestyle/2005/03/31/2005-03-31_mail_order_matchmaking___new.html, Washington Posthttp://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-1317828.html, CBC CanadaNewshttp://www.cbc.ca/news/story/2000/05/15/women.html, as well as these ones http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-24761571_ITMhttp://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2000/may/00053002.htmlhttp://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-30538339.html and others. There is also a reasonable amount of coverage in this GoogleNews search of his childhood """"AskHenry"""" column, although I don't know how much that counts now. GoogleBooks gives 45 hits http://books.google.com/books?um=1&lr=&q=%22Henry%20Makow%22&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=np (I am not sure how many are actually related to him). GoogleScholar produces 26 hits totalhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?um=1&lr=&q=%22Henry%20Makow%22&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ps, a few of which appear relevant, such as thishttp://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/497347. Granted, this is not much, but for a conspiracy theorist it is not that bad. |Reliable sources usually avoid them. So I think one could stretch here a bit""" Deletion of Henry Makow WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5581 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gene Freidman User:World 03:02, 4 August 2017 (UTC) comment """I am amazed by the level of distortion and outright dishonesty I've seen in this discussion. There are a '''total''' of 48 edits to this article since it was created in 2015. That includes bot edits and edits since it was put up for deletion. Phrases like """"constantly pushed into being a SOAPBOX"""" and claims of violations based on false readings of the guideline make me question whether everyone here is acting in good faith, or simply arguing to justify a foregone conclusion, namely that since the article was created by an editor who was part of a paid editing sockfarm that it must be deleted regardless of the article itself""" Deletion of Gene Freidman WP:BLPCRIME Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +5582 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Water Centre User:Qrsdogg 13:57, 2 June 2011 (UTC) keep Gets a decent amount of coverage in Google News, looks like there is enough to meet . I added one source to the article, certainly potential for a decent article here Deletion of International Water Centre WP:NGO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5583 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tatiana Iuel User:Metropolitan90 05:29, 1 November 2007 (UTC) delete per nom. Being in the line of succession to the British throne is not inherently a claim of notability, particularly when there are over 900 people ahead of the person (as there are for Tatiana), the person is only 5 years old, and no sources are provided to indicate any media coverage of her life. People much higher in the British line of succession have been deleted per ; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marina Ogilvy, Zenouska Mowatt, and Christian Mowatt for a group of people in the top 40 of the succession line whose articles were deleted Deletion of Tatiana Iuel WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5584 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Donnelly (journalist) User:Mkdw 05:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC) delete I support the delete camp's argument that the individual does not seem to meet , either as an athlete or a journalist. In regards to the relisting, anyone may if they feel consensus has not been adequately established, and not restricted to admins even in close calls. A relisting is different than a close Deletion of Daniel Donnelly (journalist) WP:ANYBIO||WP:RELIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5585 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of artists influenced by Michael Jackson User:Georgethedragonslayer 02:19, 12 April 2021 (UTC) delete per and Deletion of List of artists influenced by Michael Jackson WP:FANCRUFT||WP:LISTCRUFT Wikipedia:Fancruft 61 +5586 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yu Bo User:Atlantic306 21:42, 6 March 2019 (UTC) keep the article needs improvement with additional references but the actor has plenty of leading roles so easily passes Deletion of Yu Bo WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5587 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefan Denkovich User:Argyle 20:35, 14 August 2011 (UTC) delete Fails and . The Red Star stats are false Deletion of Stefan Denkovich WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5588 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Price (businessman) User:AllyD 08:20, 31 January 2018 (UTC) delete """To be """"the first male managing director of Topshop for eighteen years"""" is not inherently notable. A Sunday Times magazine feature on the subject's home furnishings may be a closer call, but neither that nor http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/news/article-4890866/Is-Paul-Price-right-man-Topshop-top.html a """"This is Money"""" piece on his appointment is, I think, sufficient to demonstrate |encyclopaedic notability""" Deletion of Paul Price (businessman) :WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5589 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AdPushup (2nd nomination) [[user: MrX|Mr]][[user talk:MrX|X]] 15:24, 30 September 2015 (UTC) delete The only thing notable about the company is that it received a small capital injection. Most of the coverage in reliable souces is trivial. Fails Deletion of AdPushup (2nd nomination) WP:ORGDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5590 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luis Vázquez Martínez User:David 05:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC) keep I have completely rewritten and stubbed-down the article, so that it no longer looks like a cv. Regardless of the messed-up scholar page, and whatever his actual citations are, I think the corresponding membership in the Spanish Royal Academy gives him a pass of #C3 Deletion of Luis Vázquez Martínez WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5591 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evidence regarding Bigfoot User:TexasAndroid 15:59, 29 October 2009 (UTC) keep Proper split performed per and . Problems with the POV of the sub-article are reasons to fix the sub-article, not to delete it or shoe-horn it back into the main article Deletion of Evidence regarding Bigfoot WP:SIZE||WP:SPLIT Wikipedia:Article size 3 +5592 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuljeet Singh User:Nomoskedasticity 13:25, 10 April 2009 (UTC) delete clearly does not meet , and I don't see enough coverage elsewhere to satisfy -- e.g. a news search http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?um=1&ned=uk&hl=en&num=50&q=Khalsa-college+OR+theatre+%22kuljeet+singh+%22&cf=all here. Some of those hits are not to the Kuljeet Singh in question, and none of them covers him, rather they contain brief remarks by him about something else Deletion of Kuljeet Singh WP:PROF||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5593 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aziz Shavershian (2nd nomination) User:A412 22:29, 25 March 2012 (UTC) keep This again? Subject clearly passes |GNG Deletion of Aziz Shavershian (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5594 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurglin Gutz user:Andrew 10:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC) keep """It's easy to find coverage in the ''https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1995-11-21-9511210328-story.html Chicago Tribune'', ''https://www.nytimes.com/1999/09/05/nyregion/new-yorkers-co-toys-and-items-that-began-as-found-objects.html New York Times'', ''https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Encyclopedia_of_Major_Marketing_Campaign/MWUPAQAAMAAJ?hl=en Encyclopedia of Major Marketing Campaigns'', &c. Our policy applies, """"''If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page""" Deletion of Gurglin Gutz WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +5595 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Barker User:Jeepday 03:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC) delete fails also the article Wargames Research Group is referenceless as the single link to subject web presence is a dead 404 link Deletion of Phil Barker WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5596 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodson Farmstead User:TheCatalyst31 11:29, 14 November 2013 (UTC) keep For a property to be listed on the National Register, a nomination form must be submitted explaining the historical significance of the property, complete with a bibliography. The federal government must then approve the nomination and designate the property as historically significant, using a higher standard than Wikipedia's standard for notability. If a property is significant enough to pass the standards of the National Register, it is certainly significant enough to pass the . (In the case of this article, see page 9 of reference 2 for an assertion of the significance of the property Deletion of Woodson Farmstead WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5597 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wellesley College Senate bus User:The 21:07, 4 September 2013 (UTC) keep Notability may be tenuous, but it's there and it |isn't temporary Deletion of Wellesley College Senate bus WP:NTEMP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5598 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tove Jensen (2nd nomination) User:Gene93k 21:03, 5 March 2008 (UTC) delete per . Tove has been a widely known porn legend for 30 years, but I have never seen anything about her from a credible source. Aside from a small, but memorable body of work, there are few facts and stories conflict Deletion of Tove Jensen (2nd nomination) WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5599 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Hernandez User:Youngamerican 13:22, 28 July 2009 (UTC) delete Fails and . Also move David Hernandez (baseball), the notable baseball player, to David Hernandez after deletion Deletion of David Hernandez WP:MUSIC||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5600 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jini (IRC client) User:Joe 23:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC) delete I can't find |significant coverage for this software Deletion of Jini (IRC client) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5601 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Our Fragile Intellect (2nd nomination) User:Tryptofish 15:54, 4 January 2015 (UTC) merge """to Gerald Crabtree. I came here from the ping to editors who commented in the previous AfD. Looking at the page as it has come to be now, the """"reception"""" section is entirely about negative receptions in the scientific community, and the """"cultural trope"""" section is basically about this work echoing cultural ideas that preceded it, rather than exerting influence of its own. I agree with Qwertyus that this AfD should evaluate the page as a news event more than as a scientific concept. I do think the topic is interesting and encyclopedic in the context of Crabtree's work, and it seems to me that the biographical page is currently incomplete without it, so a merge would improve that biographical page. But I think that points against keeping this standalone page""" Deletion of Our Fragile Intellect (2nd nomination) WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5602 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What'sBest! Excel Spreadsheet Solver User:Leebo86 04:50, 14 February 2007 (UTC) delete as |blatant advertising. The only reason the tag is off is because the author has repeatedly removed it. The author was warned once, but that was it Deletion of What'sBest! Excel Spreadsheet Solver WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Spam 26 +5603 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Stanley User:David 19:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC) delete Neither the article nor the various Google searches that I tried provide any indication of the academic impact that would lead to a pass of #1, nor that his ideas have become sufficiently widespread in the popular press to pass more generally Deletion of Timothy Stanley WP:PROF||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5604 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyprus–Norway relations (3rd nomination) User:Tarc 23:33, 15 May 2010 (UTC) delete """No notability established by reliable sources for these relations. Simply listing treaties and other agreements and calling it a """"relation"""" is |synthesis""" Deletion of Cyprus–Norway relations (3rd nomination) WP:SYNTH Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5605 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carol Hunt User:Snappy 17:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC) delete """No evidence of |notability. Another election candidate special, standing for election does not make a person notable. If she is a """"famous journalist"""" in Ireland, I must be reading the wrong newspapers/listening to the wrong radio/watching the wrong TV shows as I've never heard of her. If she was really notable, she would have had an article ages ago""" Deletion of Carol Hunt WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5606 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Txgarage User:Metropolitan90 13:15, 12 July 2011 (UTC) delete No |independent reliable sources have been provided, and I haven't found any myself Deletion of Txgarage WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5607 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grapefruit—Juicy Fruit User:Esradekan 02:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC) delete as an unlikely redirect term, fails notability per #Songs. No awards, no chart, no covers, no . Nothing to merge due to the lack of reliable, third-party, sources Deletion of Grapefruit—Juicy Fruit WP:MUSIC||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5608 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/± Junkie User:AnmaFinotera 19:23, 19 March 2009 (UTC) delete completely unnotable series. Fails and Deletion of ± Junkie WP:BK||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5609 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethan Clerc User:Ryan 03:41, 8 March 2017 (UTC) keep """ holds that """"If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list."""" Significant coverage is defined as when the sources address the subject directly and in detail and are not a trivial mention. This is the case for all of the news articles used in the article. You describe the press as """"indiscriminate"""" and local; however, while the two articles from the Citizen are examples of local press, the articles from the ''Daily Globe'', ''Marshall Independent'', and KEYC are all large regional publications/media outlets. While Clerc is based within the circulation area of both the ''Citizen'' and the ''Daily Globe'', neither of the other two publications circulate there. {{u|duffbeerforme}}, could you elaborate on which aspect of you feel this article does not meet? """ Deletion of Ethan Clerc WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5610 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central European Diabetes Association User:Peterkingiron 22:56, 4 October 2009 (UTC) keep I suspect that the lack of Ghits is because any on the subject will be in German or other Central European languages, not English Deletion of Central European Diabetes Association WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5611 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Youth Party User:Slon02 04:52, 15 November 2011 (UTC) delete per nom and Deletion of National Youth Party WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5612 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seb Buddle User:Fenix 07:35, 1 August 2016 (UTC) delete Fails |NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a |fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy |GNG Deletion of Seb Buddle WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5613 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BizTech College User:Ifnord 03:07, 23 December 2018 (UTC) delete for failing any claim to Deletion of BizTech College WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5614 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted & Ralph User:pd_THOR 16:37, 15 October 2008 (UTC) delete This article is mostly constitutive of |unreferenced |plot reiteration and |personal interpretation. There is not evidence of this topic having received significant coverage in Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources|secondary sources that are Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources|independent of the subject as stipulated by the |notability guideline Deletion of Ted & Ralph WP:V||WP:PLOT||WP:OR||WP:N Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5615 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 FIFA World Cup Third Place Play-Off User:X96lee15 11:41, 11 July 2014 (UTC) delete As of now, the article is merely receiving coverage. Does not meet Deletion of 2014 FIFA World Cup Third Place Play-Off WP:ROUTINE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5616 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Coates (longevity claimant) (2nd nomination) User:Britishfinance 19:08, 18 July 2019 (UTC) keep """He has enough quality references to meet at least a technical pass of (I added two more from the Washington Post, and a lesser mention from the Wall Street Journal). There are also several books that mention the hoax (which I think it was). A hoax that lasted many years (the Washington Post first did an article in 1999 with follow-ups in 2002, and 2004), cannot really be an """"event"""". I think the case would be interesting to a reader wanting to know the facts of what actually happened here""" Deletion of William Coates (longevity claimant) (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5617 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Still Play User:Zingarese 02:36, 1 November 2019 (UTC) keep i feel there is enough coverage about this piece in reliable sources to pass the . Thanks {{u|Jg2904}} for your cleanup efforts Deletion of I Still Play WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5618 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shon Harris User:DoriSmith 01:38, 20 January 2010 (UTC) delete """if—and only if—the subject has requested deletion. I believe that this falls under eletion policy#Deletion discussion, which says, """"Discussions concerning biographical articles of relatively unknown, non-public figures, where the subject has requested deletion and there is no rough consensus may be closed as delete."""" I think that she'd be borderline notable (meets due to her http://orlabs.oclc.org/identities/lccn-n2002-152994 books being held in 1272 libraries) but it would be difficult to find sufficient sources ''about'' her to write a solid article""" Deletion of Shon Harris WP:D||WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Disambiguation 64 +5619 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chantra User:Ravenswing 16:40, 18 December 2009 (UTC) delete """Beyond the comments above, I strongly object to the charge that deleting an unsourced article involves cultural bias, just because the subject pertains to another country. is an absolute: """"All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation ... If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it."""" Period. There is nothing in giving a free pass to article topics involving foreign countries""" Deletion of Chantra WP:V||WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5620 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaux Le Mouël User:Pharaoh 03:14, 3 April 2020 (UTC) keep passes Deletion of Margaux Le Mouël WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5621 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ximena Zamora User:Bri 18:37, 10 November 2020 (UTC) delete clearly this was meant to be included by the !voters in the prior two AfDs. If the closer needs a clear policy-based reason, it is Deletion of Ximena Zamora WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +5622 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thakur Shivam Singh (2nd nomination) User:Chris 14:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC) delete I'm not convinced the sources cited are all talking about the same person; with the broken English of the article, it's hard to ascertain. Subject certainly fails and . This article should be developed in the Wikipedia of the native language of the subject's area Deletion of Thakur Shivam Singh (2nd nomination) WP:NPOL||WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5623 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cambridge Working Group user:Andrew 11:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC) keep """This group was effective in getting a moratorium on dangerous virus experimentation in 2014. But then the experiments were resumed in 2017. And now we have a novel virus causing a global pandemic. The matter has naturally attracted attention such as https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(18)30006-9/fulltext this at each stage and this large group of scientists seems to be a significant part of the story. I'm not finding another article on Wikipedia which covers the history of this controversy in a more general way. If there is one, the worst case would be that we merge into it. Otherwise this will have to do as a start and we should be considering expansion. applies: """"''If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page""" Deletion of The Cambridge Working Group WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +5624 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Sommer (aerospace engineer) User:Seattle 19:55, 25 March 2007 (UTC) delete Totally non-notable, patri-biography by son Mark Sommer. And I think it is obvious what to make of http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Del_West&action=history this and the entire Del West article, it appears to be advertising spam in violation of #G11. I've added a {{tl|db-spam}} tag to that page. It is the work of multiple single-purpose sock-puppet accounts, each named similar to the son of the company president, our own subject here (see Special:Contributions/Marksommer, Special:Contributions/Marksommer1, and Special:Contributions/Mjsommer), along with a single-purpose IP Special:Contributions/71.106.51.37. Blatant adverti-spam, with no evidence of notability or secondary sources Deletion of Alfred Sommer (aerospace engineer) WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +5625 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trust Me, I'm Dr. Ozzy User:Stuartyeates 09:25, 11 October 2011 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Trust Me, I'm Dr. Ozzy WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5626 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabrielle David NONE NONE comment I'm finding some things here and there like https://www.bostonglobe.com/arts/books/2016/07/19/the-hole-story-sweet-tale/MDbo6lrUyKeFR1b0MHzPBM/story.html this that shows that she ''might'' be notable, but if there is enough out there I'd suggest that this get -d and started afresh by a non-COI editor. There's so much puffery and promotion in the article, along with unsourced claims, that this would pretty much need to be re-written from scratch. What makes the unsourced claims problematic is that other than it posing a BLP issue, I'm concerned about some of the vague claims in other articles, like the claims of the Phatitude magazine winning an award. Neither the magazine article or website specify what this award actually ''is'', which means that it could be anything from something that could give notability to an award given out by a non-notable self-published blog or a vanity award. In other words, in an attempt to promote all things IAAS, the editors have actually done more harm than good because they've just ended up casting far more doubt on the veracity of the claims. I don't doubt that this might have happened in some form or fashion, but now we have to question whether or not any of the claims are getting puffed up beyond what they actually are. This is why COI editing - specifically article creation and the addition of major chunks of text - needs to be done very, very carefully. From a personal standpoint this is why I've refused some requests from people or organizations I'm familiar with, where the COI and issues (tone, COI) pose too much of a problem Deletion of Gabrielle David WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +5627 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uthman Abdul Rahim Mohammed Uthman User:Metropolitan90 19:58, 27 December 2008 (UTC) delete per . Zero independent sources are provided within the article itself. The New York Times citation in the article is not to an article about the subject, just to a ''reprint'' on the NYT web site of ''primary sources'' relating to the administrative proceedings about his detention and combatant status review Deletion of Uthman Abdul Rahim Mohammed Uthman WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5628 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of schools in Jamaica (2nd nomination) User:Ajf773 08:28, 16 October 2017 (UTC) delete per with no prejudice to re-create. The list as it is now is long and indiscriminate (and difficult to read). The article would be better suited to be a list of sub-lists broken down by region Deletion of List of schools in Jamaica (2nd nomination) WP:TNT Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over 4 +5629 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manhattan Fruitier User:Ben 06:43, 9 August 2015 (UTC) comment on ''draft/userfy'': The author is a who left wikipedia one minute after his creation of the article. —  Deletion of Manhattan Fruitier WP:SPA Wikipedia:Single-purpose account 21 +5630 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timmy Purcell User:GiantSnowman 10:00, 28 August 2012 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Timmy Purcell WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5631 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of islands of Syria User:SportingFlyer 10:47, 4 November 2018 (UTC) keep Valid albeit short article Deletion of List of islands of Syria WP:NLIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5632 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CTA International User:Silver 04:50, 28 March 2010 (UTC) comment I have tagged this article for |rescue Deletion of CTA International WP:ARS Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron 46 +5633 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Art+Feminism User:Clpo13 16:37, 13 March 2016 (UTC) keep There are plenty of reliable, independent sources reporting on this, enough to satisfy . The article is distinct from Wikipedia:Meetup/ArtAndFeminism in that it's a report on the event without the meta aspects of coordinating. Compare The Signpost (Wikipedia)|''The Signpost'' (Wikipedia) and Knowledge Engine (Wikimedia Foundation) for other articles on Wikipedia/WMF aspects or initiatives Deletion of Art+Feminism WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5634 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OurStage (2nd nomination) User:Pharaoh 18:58, 6 November 2020 (UTC) delete per nom and above fails Deletion of OurStage (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5635 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Catholic American entertainers User:Adrian_M 21:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC) delete per nom, and nominate similar lists while you're at it. That should appease the |WAXers Deletion of List of Catholic American entertainers WP:WAX Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +5636 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mia Ikumi User:Allen4names 04:45, 25 September 2016 (UTC) keep As her one-shot ''Only One Wish'' may meet #1 (see /REQUEST#O) thereby just meeting #3 Deletion of Mia Ikumi WP:BK||WP:ANIME||WP:CREATIVE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5637 """Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manly """"Little Pickles"""" Ortega""" User:SummerPhD 15:16, 9 May 2011 (UTC) comment It's also unfortunate that doesn't protect him from the scandalous claims in that source that he is the father of that bitch Noodle's pups """Deletion of Manly """"Little Pickles"""" Ortega""" WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +5638 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Jessica Evans User:Bri 02:41, 30 May 2018 (UTC) delete """Certainly not a notable motorcyclist by any standard ever used for a bio known at ikiProject Motorcycling. Her name moniker """"Goth Girl"""" appears once in """"The 1%er Encyclopedia"""" and maybe she was in a documentary (we aren't sure about this even) ... no go. So, since it is also clearly failing , this is a delete""" Deletion of Karen Jessica Evans WP:W||WP:NCREATIVE Help:Watchlist 57 +5639 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Whiteside (photographer) User:Rpclod 22:54, 3 February 2018 (UTC) delete a book and an exhibit are not enough to establish notability Deletion of Thomas Whiteside (photographer) WP:NARTIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5640 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autariatae User:Bearian 20:33, 27 September 2007 (UTC) keep and clean up, as passing , although I am in no measure an expert on the topic Deletion of Autariatae WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5641 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard Lewinsky User:Umbralcorax 01:05, 5 July 2011 (UTC) keep Unless the event in question was his meeting , then doesn't apply. Simply put, the man would be notable even without his relation to Monica Deletion of Bernard Lewinsky WP:ACADEMIC||WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5642 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Taylor (boxer) User:Papaursa 19:23, 8 November 2015 (UTC) delete I don't believe he's achieved notability as a boxer or has the significant coverage required to meet Deletion of Anthony Taylor (boxer) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5643 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ijaaz Ebrahim User:Ifnord 16:55, 25 July 2019 (UTC) delete Well documented nomination showing subject fails Deletion of Ijaaz Ebrahim WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5644 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Average frustrated chump (4th nomination) User:A 05:12, 29 December 2009 (UTC) keep """First of all, does not prohibit articles on neologisms; it merely states that they often aren't notable enough for an article of their own: """"Some neologisms can be in frequent use, and it may be possible to pull together many facts about a particular term and show evidence of its usage on the Internet or even in larger society. It may be natural, then, to feel that Wikipedia should have a page devoted to this new term, and this is sometimes but not always the case."""" This is such a neologism; it has entered the popular culture and can be found in many, many reliable sources (just glancing at the Google News and Google Books search results). The article as it stands is not , either; it cites multiple reliable sources, and while Strauss's book is the main reference, it is far from the only one. (Newspaper sources include ''The New York Times'' and ''The New York Sun''.) If anything, the article has improved since the last AfD (where the consensus was to keep""" Deletion of Average frustrated chump (4th nomination) WP:NEO||WP:OR Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +5645 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebel Pundit User:Mnnlaxer 15:48, 6 July 2015 (UTC) delete """fails : """"The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works"""". This criteria excludes trivial mention, such as the current sources""" Deletion of Rebel Pundit WP:WEBCRIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5646 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suffering Silence User:Tony 22:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC) delete as failing Deletion of Suffering Silence WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5647 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beaner (2nd nomination) User:Yukichigai 23:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC) comment """Yes, that's right, call me stupid. Excellent way to hammer your point home. Now, ignorance of aside, let's address the issue of """"adding more dictionary article content"""": the article contains a brief, expandable summary of the term's history and subjective impact. All these bits of information are outside the scope of a dictionary definition; a dicdef would be limited to the meaning and useage of the word. -- |Y'''|""" Deletion of Beaner (2nd nomination) WP:CIVIL||WP:IKNOWBEST Wikipedia:Civility 90 +5648 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metropolitan Jewish Hospice User:AdventurousSquirrel 07:14, 28 April 2014 (UTC) delete I've added a few external links, but none/all of them don't represent significant coverage. I'm sure the organization does good work, but Wikipedia is Deletion of Metropolitan Jewish Hospice WP:NOTADIRECTORY Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5649 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Brazilian footballers (2nd nomination) User:Lugnuts 17:17, 20 August 2009 (UTC) keep Lists and categories go hand-in-hand per Deletion of List of Brazilian footballers (2nd nomination) WP:CLN Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates 5 +5650 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raven De La Croix User:Lacypaperclip 05:48, 16 January 2018 (UTC) keep as per Megalibrarygirl with articles from the 70's and a couple books, plus she meets Deletion of Raven De La Croix WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5651 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anders Lundkvist User:Shoessss 14:15, 5 November 2008 (UTC) keep But just barely. I understand there are virtually no English language references to Anders Lundkvist|Mr. Lundkvist. However, in my opinion, Wikipedia extends beyond just language and is chartered with the dissemination of knowledge and information regardless of culture – language or location. With that said, there is enough Swedish coverage from reliable – certifiable – creditable – and verifiable sources, as shown here http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Anders+Lundkvist%22&sa=N&start=10, to meet the criteria for inclusion under otability|Notability Deletion of Anders Lundkvist WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5652 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bottlecap shooting User:Alexius08 08:33, 7 October 2008 (UTC) delete it as a |how-to guide Deletion of Bottlecap shooting WP:NOTHOWTO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5653 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robo.to User:South 23:33, 21 September 2009 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Robo.to WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5654 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Holden User:Fenix 09:04, 29 March 2016 (UTC) keep Passes |NFOOTY, has played in a |fully professional league or in a match in the competition proper (i.e. not qualifying rounds) of a cup competition which involved two teams both from FPLs. |Article size is not a valid reason for deletion Deletion of Ralph Holden WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:ASZ Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5655 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Value Research User:KGirlTrucker81 19:34, 19 August 2016 (UTC) delete Fails |GNG Deletion of Value Research WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5656 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven A. Garan User:David 02:44, 2 May 2010 (UTC) delete The publication record and academic administration record doesn't rise to the level of passing . The walled garden here seems to mirror a real-life walled garden at his CREA and ARC affiliations but not big enough of one to make him notable Deletion of Steven A. Garan WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5657 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti Dogmatism User:Guy 05:06, 14 May 2017 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Anti Dogmatism WP:NALBUM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5658 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaahin Filizadeh User:David 15:06, 19 June 2009 (UTC) delete """no evidence of passing . Assistant professor with a record that does not stand out among other assistant professors; few citations in Google scholar. Actually holding an NSERC chair might be grounds for keeping, but being """"associated with"""" one is not""" Deletion of Shaahin Filizadeh WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5659 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christos Kalousis User:onel5969 03:48, 25 May 2021 (UTC) keep while at the time the nom was made they did not pass , they now do. And while having only played in one game, they most likely will play in more Deletion of Christos Kalousis WP:NFOOTY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5660 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nintoaster User:Jelly 08:20, 23 April 2012 (UTC) delete failing Deletion of Nintoaster WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5661 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kern, Alaska User:Necrothesp 15:36, 24 May 2019 (UTC) keep Seems to have existed and notable per Deletion of Kern, Alaska WP:GEOLAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5662 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panjeta (2nd nomination) User:Primefac 20:49, 31 October 2016 (UTC) keep per . Small-village stubs are perfectly acceptable provided they can be shown to exist (which this one does Deletion of Panjeta (2nd nomination) WP:NPLACE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5663 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four (film) User:MichaelQSchmidt 05:37, 3 September 2010 (UTC) keep """and expand as release draws near. Or at the least, |userfy to its author for continued work away from mainspace. To respectfully disagree with the nominator, is being inapproproiately applied, as it specifically allows that """"| it ''is'' appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced""" Deletion of Four (film) WP:USERFY||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:CBALL Wikipedia:Userfication 22 +5664 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adesh Tyagi User:Septrillion 08:09, 6 July 2018 (UTC) delete Fails \\\Septrillion Deletion of Adesh Tyagi WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5665 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Born for This (Paramore song) User:SkierRMH 21:39, 23 October 2007 (UTC) delete fails #Songs|Song notability on all five points Deletion of Born for This (Paramore song) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5666 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Critchley User:Trident13 01:37, 23 January 2008 (UTC) keep passes as there are sufficent . Rgds Deletion of Laura Critchley WP:MUSIC||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5667 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myra Wilson User:BlueValour 03:52, 6 September 2006 (UTC) delete Smith and Sharkey are both Professors and have, therefore, much more notability. Also no references to published works. At the moment I don't see Wilson meeting Deletion of Myra Wilson WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5668 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allan Dameron User:Coredesat 21:03, 23 June 2006 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Allan Dameron WP:BIO||WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5669 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dice Creep [[User talk:Satori Son|Satori Son]] 05:39, 19 December 2006 (UTC) delete per and . --  Deletion of Dice Creep WP:VERIFY||WP:NFT Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5670 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circle of Death (beer) User:TBC 06:03, 3 April 2006 (UTC) delete interesting, but |not notable Deletion of Circle of Death (beer) WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5671 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max (ripping software) User:Stuartyeates 10:39, 7 September 2011 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Max (ripping software) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5672 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The God That Failed (song) User:VasileGaburici NONE delete unless claims of notability are substantiated in the article. As it stands, it fails . Those claiming notability have to provide some details, not just vague claims that it's mentioned in some books, per Deletion of The God That Failed (song) WP:MUSIC||WP:BURDEN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5673 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Parhamovich User:MacGyverMagic 17:22, 17 December 2008 (UTC) delete While there may have been lots of reports, most of those weren't independent and none of them went beyond reporting her death. Also applies. She's known only for her death which had no lasting impact on US perception of the war in Iraq, nor any procedures or laws inside Iraq itself. Basically a memorial, like the book her husband wrote Deletion of Andrea Parhamovich WP:ONEEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5674 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandrin Fernando User:Pharaoh 14:58, 6 October 2017 (UTC) delete per nom fails and Deletion of Chandrin Fernando WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +5675 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ESPN College Basketball broadcast teams User:Lightburst 00:40, 5 January 2020 (UTC) keep Per useful for navigation and information. RS exists Deletion of ESPN College Basketball broadcast teams WP:NLIST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5676 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mounao Thoibi User:onel5969 12:57, 8 December 2015 (UTC) delete was waiting to see if there was any improvement. I can't find anything to help, and in its current state doesn't pass Deletion of Mounao Thoibi WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5677 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of common misconceptions (4th nomination) [[User talk:142.160.89.97|talk]]) 05:39, 30 September 2018 (UTC) delete per , Special:Contributions/86.149.219.138|86.149.219.138, and the nominator. Regarding those who argue that the list merely needs more stringent inclusion criteria, I cannot conceive of what any set of adequate criteria could look like that wouldn't pose a '''''huge''''' {{tl|globalize}} issue. Special:Contributions/142.160.89.97|142.160.89.97 Deletion of List of common misconceptions (4th nomination) WP:NOPAGE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5678 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon cobb User:ChrisTheDude 21:27, 24 January 2007 (UTC) delete """Subject does not even come close to meeting , and signing a contract with non-league Kings Lynn F.C.|Kings Lynn certainly won't change that. Note that none of the """"Keep"""" puppets !voters ''(I'm being charitable)'' have offered any argument other than """ Deletion of Simon cobb WP:BIO||WP:ILIKEIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5679 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How a good person can really win User:Coolabahapple 07:44, 1 May 2018 (UTC) delete does not meet or , have been unable to find any |useable reviews Deletion of How a good person can really win WP:NBOOK||WP:GNG||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5680 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/María Martha Fernández User:BrownHairedGirl 15:08, 17 May 2006 (UTC) delete as per Gadig. I can understand why IgnatiusReilly is disappointed, but this article does not make the grade for notability as per Deletion of María Martha Fernández WP:NN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5681 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Forsyth Experience User:FisherQueen 16:54, 22 May 2009 (UTC) delete I can't find any evidence that this team meets the |notability criteria; a google search revealed no |reliable sources that have discussed it. Creator has declared a |conflict of interest as a member of the team, and as far as I can tell, this is not the University team but an intramural team Deletion of Alex Forsyth Experience WP:N||WP:RS||WP:COI Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5682 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Mary's Cathedral, Pazhanji User:Carlossuarez46 18:41, 7 August 2018 (UTC) merge with Pazhanji - the village in which the church is located. My thoughts: and don't apply. This is a building, not a village or mountain or lake. I find it difficult to find any unaffiliated reliable sources containing coverage of this church. Even the diocese has no article Kunnamkulam diocese. However, the self-published material can support the inclusion of the information/text in another article, which I merit should should be the village in which this church is located. We have many articles on populated places that have sections on a particular (but not notable in the WP sense) building. Why not this as well Deletion of St. Mary's Cathedral, Pazhanji WP:GEOLAND||WP:GEOFEAT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5683 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unknown Spectacular Spiderman remake User:Phantomsteve 22:25, 18 November 2009 (UTC) delete If there had been anything verifiable here, I would have suggested that it be merged into The_Spectacular_Spider-Man_(TV_series)#Future, but as it stands, this is unfounded speculation, with shades of Deletion of Unknown Spectacular Spiderman remake WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5684 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phousseyne Diaby User:Path 08:06, 6 April 2019 (UTC) keep Definitely satisfies , , , (this player is a member of a team participating in tournaments conducted by FIFA), links= https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/phousseyne-diaby/profil/spieler/182815, https://www.whoscored.com/Players/116578/Show/Phousseyne-Diaby, etc Deletion of Phousseyne Diaby WP:BIO||WP:SPORTSPERSON||WP:NSPORT||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5685 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deadly Medicine User:Qworty 22:58, 27 April 2013 (UTC) delete Just because a book is a bestseller doesn't mean it's going to meet . It might not pass , no matter how many copies were sold. However, a book that sold very poorly might have lots and lots of that satisfy . Notability for books is never based on sales alone. It's based on significant independent multiple coverage. Same notability standards as for any article on Wikipedia. Simple enough, huh Deletion of Deadly Medicine WP:BK||WP:42||WP:RS||WP:42 Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5686 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starfest User:Zxcvbnm 14:16, 14 December 2017 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Starfest WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5687 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Addo User:HeyitsRay 14:50, 7 July 2021 (UTC) keep the subject of the article has been quoted in multiple independent, reliable and newsworthy publications ''https://www.ghanaiantimes.com.gh/parliament-sensitive-to-public-concern-over-new-parliament-chamber-kate-addo Ghanian Times'',''https://starrfm.com.gh/2021/04/orphanage-homes-should-be-safe-haven-for-children-duo-concept-appeals Star Fm'',''https://www.modernghana.com/news/808121/gij-alumna-returns-to-mentor-current-students.html Modern Ghana'' because of her role as the Director of Public Affairs of the Parliament of Ghana. Addo is an individual of public interest and as such should not fail and Deletion of Kate Addo WP:NPOL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5688 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michèle Audette User:Guy 02:11, 8 May 2017 (UTC) keep Meets Deletion of Michèle Audette WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5689 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olicamera User:MichaelQSchmidt 01:28, 25 July 2014 (UTC) delete for currently completed unreleased film failing for lacking coverage in reliable sources. To be clear, my delete is '''not''' based upon the inapplicable complaints about length or distributor. Length is not a concern for film notability, as many short films have been found notable. And being distributed though YouTube is also not a deletion criteria, as some films released that way have indeed been the recipient of coverage to meet . The only valid issue in the nominator's statement is the lack of coverage. Allow undeletion or recreation after release and only if it gains coverage Deletion of Olicamera WP:NFF||WP:NF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5690 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adventure World Warsaw User:Northamerica1000 11:49, 12 April 2013 (UTC) keep Meets Wikipedia's threshold of |notability. Source examples: http://www.wbj.pl/article-55409-poland-set-for-8364400-million-theme-park.html, http://www.deluxe.hu/elmenypark-vidampark-lengyelorszag/20110722, http://www.pb.pl/2460534,18143,rozrywkowy-raj-wyrosnie-w-grodzisku Deletion of Adventure World Warsaw WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5691 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Binais Begović User:N2e 03:22, 31 January 2011 (UTC) delete notability not demonstrated in a |reliable secondary source Deletion of Binais Begović WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5692 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of foreign-born Australians User:Coolabahapple 03:43, 17 December 2017 (UTC) comment """Vague list of people, mostly politicians."""", so expand it, this is not a deletion reason, there are numerous books that discuss notable australians that were born overseas so this would meet , that said i envisage this turning into a megalist of 1000s of people (again not a reason to delete) that can be organised into various sections (with their own articles?) ie. all these pollies into a """"Politics and Government"""" section, authors in another, artists in another and so on""" Deletion of List of foreign-born Australians WP:LISTN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5693 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoni Sherbatov User:Papaursa 02:06, 12 September 2017 (UTC) comment This discussion appears to be attracting new users who don't understand the notability criteria for MMA fighters. Simply being a pro MMA fighter (or any other athlete) is not sufficient to show notability. See for the notability criteria for MMA fighters. They also don't realize that routine sports coverage does not make someone notable Deletion of Yoni Sherbatov WP:NMMA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5694 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amar Prem User:Bonadea 19:12, 4 May 2013 (UTC) keep clearly meets , and the nomination does not mention any actual reason for deletion Deletion of Amar Prem WP:NF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5695 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan Romero (witness to RFK assassination) User:Carlossuarez46 23:43, 13 January 2009 (UTC) delete clearly '''''only''''' notable in connection with RFK's assassination (that's why we have ). Also, I tend to disbelieve our own article that says that he was 12 or 13 years old while working as a busboy - underage labor would no doubt have caused some chatter and its absence tends to indicate none such occurred - demonstrating that we have systemic problems getting the story right with these marginally notable people Deletion of Juan Romero (witness to RFK assassination) WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +5696 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tshepo Stanley Ramodisa User:Bearian NONE delete per and for |lack of reliable sources Deletion of Tshepo Stanley Ramodisa WP:TOOSOON||WP:RS Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +5697 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ktjames User:Alex43223 08:30, 8 December 2008 (UTC) delete per and . Also delete other articles created by this user on the same topic. &ndash Deletion of Ktjames WP:BIO||WP:OR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5698 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SitNGo Wizard User:Pohta 22:05, 22 January 2010 (UTC) keep I don't know much about the reliability of these sites, but three of the reviews http://www.parttimepoker.com/sitngo-wizard-sngwiz-review http://www.ontherail.co.uk/poker-software/sitngo-wizard-review/ http://www.pokersoftware.com/sitngo-wizard/# appear to engage in enough critical thinking, and only http://www.learn2holdem.com/poker-software-reviews/sit-and-go-wizard-review.htm appears a mere advertorial. So, despite the obvious #Financial issues with the creator of this article, a NPOV version can be written. TonyTheTiger, who appears to be only financially motivated to edit this (in that he didn't seem to even understand the main market for this software at the beginning of the AfD) should definitely '''''' from editing the article though. The fact that we don't have articles on more notable Poker software is an argument to create those articles, not to delete this one Deletion of SitNGo Wizard WP:COI||WP:DISENGAGE Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +5699 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holly Harris User:Galerita 00:49, 28 January 2016 (UTC) delete I accept the criteria for deletion based on Wikipedia:WikiProject Figure Skating/Notability, but the article was sourced from the competition website, so I don't understand your objection on grounds Deletion of Holly Harris WP:BLP Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +5700 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pip Skid User:Gongshow 20:59, 14 May 2010 (UTC) keep """As Chubbles noted, |notability is not temporary, so significant coverage for a """"flash in the pan"""" still qualifies as significant coverage. Here is an additional source, a http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/6541-funny-farm/ Pitchfork review from 2004""" Deletion of Pip Skid WP:NTEMP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5701 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigma Omega Nu User:RightCowLeftCoast 18:19, 6 July 2012 (UTC) merge although the subject does not appear to pass or with all these AfDs for minority sorority/fraternity organizations it appears to me that perhaps an List article should be created for List of ethnic minority fraternaties and sororities in the United States, and all such organizations that fail independent can have verified content moved to such a list. If any of those organizations later are found to pass or , they can be |spunout Deletion of Sigma Omega Nu WP:GNG||WP:ORG||WP:ORG||WP:ORG||WP:GNG||WP:SPLIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5702 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prada and Prejudice User:Spicy 02:14, 15 July 2020 (UTC) keep """I found three other reviews on Gale: Miller, Donna L. """"Prada and Prejudice."""" Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, vol. 53, no. 6, 2010, p. 523. Gale General OneFile, https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A221600797/GPS?u=wikipedia&sid=GPS&xid=00d1cd9e. Accessed 14 July 2020. doi:10.1598/JAAL.53.6.9 Schultz, Jennifer. """"Hubbard, Mandy. Prada & Prejudice."""" School Library Journal, vol. 55, no. 7, July 2009, p. 85. Gale In Context: Biography, https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A203954504/GPS?u=wikipedia&sid=GPS&xid=c6296d7a. Accessed 14 July 2020.Cooper, Ilene. """"Prada & Prejudice."""" Booklist, vol. 105, no. 18, 15 May 2009, p. 53. Gale In Context: Biography, https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A200916077/GPS?u=wikipedia&sid=GPS&xid=58544196. Accessed 14 July 2020. The reviews are fairly brief, but I think there is just about enough here to pass """ Deletion of Prada and Prejudice WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5703 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prateek Parmar user:Hellknowz 15:08, 18 June 2020 (UTC) delete as failing and / with no reliable independent in-depth sources, in this case in-depth in particular. —   Deletion of Prateek Parmar WP:GNG||WP:NBIO||WP:NCREATIVE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5704 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New River, Nanjing User:Philg88 05:51, 13 May 2014 (UTC) delete The town doesn't appear as an official subdivision of the Jianye District according to the National Bureau of Statistics of the People's Republic of China. See http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjbz/tjyqhdmhcxhfdm/2013/32/01/320105.html this link. Thereby fails |verifiability. No reliable source found to justify retention as a stub, probably an informal name for part of the Jianye District used by locals. The Baidu and Aibang references are not considered |reliable and I can find no others Deletion of New River, Nanjing WP:V||WP:RS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5705 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axialis IconWorkshop User:Joe 19:27, 4 August 2009 (UTC) delete All the sources in the article are trivial except forhttp://www.pcworld.com/downloads/file/fid,23549/description.html?&page=11 this. Fails Deletion of Axialis IconWorkshop WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5706 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reach Every Dolla User:DMacks 23:00, 10 June 2008 (UTC) delete non-notable band and album/single/etc. Fails many ways Deletion of Reach Every Dolla WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5707 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evil Factory Network User:UkPaolo 10:43, 5 March 2006 (UTC) delete fails to establish notability per as far as I'm concerned Deletion of Evil Factory Network WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5708 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sweetest Day Hoax User:Isotope23 20:04, 6 September 2006 (UTC) comment """well, by all means... if you have """"primary source information"""" that has not been posted here or in the article yet, that specifically proves this day was a hoax created by the 12 individuals you feel are responsible for it ''and'' refers to them as """"founders"""" of Sweetest Day, then what are you waiting for? I for one welcome you to produce this evidence if it exists so I can stop wasting my time here... As for the census data, I'd already seen all that during the original AfD of Sweetest Day and I'm at a loss to see what you think that proves. It shows that he exists, that he resided in Cleveland, that he worked in advertising, and at some point he apparently owned a confectionery shop. How is that at odds with the popular mythology of """"Herbert Birch Kingston, a philanthropist and candy company employee..."""" Candy companies employ advertisers. Anyone can be a philanthropist. The census data ''proves nothing either way''... other than his exsitence, residence, and employment. As for sourcing, the current article is sourced by primary and secondary sources. I'm tired of explaining this... so I'll leave it at that. If you have problems with sourcing of information on other websites, I suggest you contact them. The original Sweetest Day page has stopped because it is finally to a point where it contains only information that is |verified. You may think it pathetic, but IMO this is probably the best version of this page that has ever existed at this namespace... though it would be improved by Leigh Eric Schmidt's version of Sweetest Day from his book""" Deletion of The Sweetest Day Hoax WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5709 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Army of One (2020 film) User:ReaderofthePack 07:07, 17 November 2020 (UTC) delete as there's not enough coverage to show that this meets . No objection to its restoration when/if it gets more coverage upon its release date Deletion of Army of One (2020 film) WP:NFF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5710 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Sampson User:Ceosad 16:54, 13 December 2015 (UTC) delete It might be also wise to protect the redirect for some time (a few months?) to block recreating this article. Just in case. I do not think there is much to preserve as the sources are very bad. Deletion of Andrew Sampson WP:PRESERVE Wikipedia:Editing policy 24 +5711 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Westphal User:Sir 15:22, 9 October 2016 (UTC) delete Since the international matches he played were not Tier 1, the article does not meet Deletion of Daniel Westphal WP:NSPORT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5712 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yorkshire Bleeps and Bass User:Chzz 04:32, 25 August 2009 (UTC) delete per nom - and I looked around quite a bit; everything that I did found seems to come from WP. Hence, does not meet through lack of coverage Deletion of Yorkshire Bleeps and Bass WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5713 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deal or No Deal (United States) models User:However 23:06, 26 July 2011 (UTC) keep Article meets Deletion of Deal or No Deal (United States) models WP:LISTPURP Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +5714 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aparajit Deb User:Folken 21:08, 16 September 2012 (UTC) delete fails no significant coverage in secondary sources Deletion of Aparajit Deb WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5715 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pocketbook (song) User:RadioFan 20:36, 17 August 2009 (UTC) keep I did not check the reviews but there seems to be acknowledgement that there are several reviews. If that is the case, the song meets |the general notability requirements and so the specific music criteria that Deletion of Pocketbook (song) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5716 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erdős–Bacon–Sabbath number User:David 20:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC) delete I removed two sources (the ''Telegraph'' and ''Nature'') which appeared to be used to support the notability of this concept, but actually don't mention it. With them gone, the only sources that actually cover the EBS number are the first three, all web sites of dubious reliability and independence. The remaining sources are all either about collaboration distances considered more generally, or are used to support |original research about the numbers of individual people. I supported keeping the article on Erdős–Bacon number because it was covered in-depth in undisputably reliable sources, despite its unimportance, but for this one I just don't see it Deletion of Erdős–Bacon–Sabbath number WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5717 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seamus (dog) (2nd nomination) User:Tarc 15:13, 24 April 2012 (UTC) delete Or merge. Simple ; dog tied to car, ideological foes make hay of it during political silly season. Give it a mention in Romney's campaign article if need be, the sources mentioned justify that much . Not a standalone Deletion of Seamus (dog) (2nd nomination) WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5718 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zach Light User:Poison 14:45, 6 January 2013 (UTC) keep Yes, this article meets Deletion of Zach Light WP:NMMA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5719 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moorad Shipping News User:Wikireader41 02:30, 14 September 2010 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Moorad Shipping News WP:N||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5720 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sludgecore User:NASCAR 12:52, 21 October 2007 (UTC) delete Most of the google news hits are trivial mentions in articles. For example, the word itself was used in a CNN movie review, but that was the only use of the word. It did have an article in the Dallas Morning News, but unfortunately you are required to pay $3 to see it and therefore is not allowed to be used as a source. So, it fails usic|the notability guidelines for music through and through Deletion of Sludgecore WP:M Wikipedia:Mediation 70 +5721 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. Joe Brandon User:Peripitus 11:39, 31 August 2006 (UTC) delete he's coauthored a number of papers ( according to googlescholar ) but does not meet the Professor criteria of and clearly fails the author section Deletion of R. Joe Brandon WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5722 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moldova–Switzerland relations User:Bearian 18:50, 19 August 2009 (UTC) keep this appears to meet the |consensus that well-referenced bilateral relations articles ought to be kept, and with all the |citations and information |now in it, this certainly makes the grade Deletion of Moldova–Switzerland relations WP:CCC||WP:RS||WP:HEY Wikipedia:Consensus 93 +5723 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fantastic Four TV game User:GabeIglesia 22:03, 1 April 2016 (UTC) delete Fails . No sources. A little surprised that this article lasted 10 whole years Deletion of Fantastic Four TV game WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5724 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Individual Counter-Strike maps User:Fuhghettaboutit 23:07, 17 July 2006 (UTC) merge into Counter-Strike, Counter-Strike maps, Custom Counter-Strike maps, etc. and '''delete'''—skirts OR; too derivative. Though I agree that there is too much information here for a complete merge, the information can and should be drastically cut down with all trivia removed. If this vote ends in no consensus, and given that this afd is specifically tailored to end the debate, I would think , and vote speedy keep in any future afd unless there were extenuating circumstances Deletion of Individual Counter-Strike maps WP:POINT Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +5725 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Johns User:Ravenswing 04:17, 26 August 2010 (UTC) delete Meets neither the GNG nor Deletion of Stephen Johns WP:NHOCKEY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5726 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Figge User:LinguistAtLarge 18:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC) keep She's only notable for this hoax/controversy, so we should cover the event not the person . —  Deletion of Jennifer Figge WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +5727 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikiislam (2nd nomination) NONE NONE comment """Weak Keep): The user who created the article is most likely not familiar with the policies of Wikipedia. The criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia is notability and for a website, that has been linked in this discussion already: Wikipedia:Notability (web) which says ''""""The content itself has been the subject of '''multiple non-trivial''' published works whose source is independent of the site itself. ... This criterion includes '''reliable''' published works in all forms""""''. So we need multiple reliable non-trivial sources. So far the user who created the article (Dawnshine; https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikiislam&action=history page history) has not provided any reliable sources with significant coverage. If anyone wants to save the article, there ''may'' be some reliable sources found on their About page: http://wikiislam.net/wiki/WikiIslam#References . You will have to look for yourself and see if anything can qualify for a reliable source with non-trivial coverage. The website has been the subject of two research papers by the same author (Goran Larson). His name is present on the references list there and the author of the article has used one of those papers http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11562-007-0002-2. This may or may not qualify for . I personally dont believe there is enough non-trivial coverage found in multiple reliable sources. Other than that the author is also violating (this has also been pointed out above) by making statements like these""" Deletion of Wikiislam (2nd nomination) WP:RS||WP:OR Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5728 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luigi Verderame User:Monterey 04:49, 25 January 2011 (UTC) delete Per Deletion of Luigi Verderame WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5729 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Gulzar Saifi User:Robofish 12:14, 31 January 2010 (UTC) merge to The Final Inch. There are plenty of references here - enough to verify the article - but not enough to establish notability independent from the film. I think this is basically a case, and he would be best covered by being merged into the article on the film Deletion of Mohammad Gulzar Saifi WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +5730 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extraterrestrial skies User:RockMagnetist 19:14, 3 April 2013 (UTC) keep I don't see among the -REASON|reasons for deletion. It may contain some , but not exclusively; and it easily meets the |general notability criteria. There are plenty of facts that either have citations or for which they could be found - after all, we have sent satellites to most of these bodies, and even taken pictures from the surfaces of some Deletion of Extraterrestrial skies WP:OR||WP:DEL||WP:OR||WP:GNG Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5731 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Supranational 2017 User:Bonutra NONE keep This is one of the notable major beauty contests of the year. It has reliable and diverse sources meet . This is evidenced in part by the https://pageviews.toolforge.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2021-05-19&end=2021-06-08&pages=Miss_Supranational_2021|Miss_Earth_2021|Miss_International_2021|Miss_Earth_2020 12,435 page views in the last 20 days, much higher than the two of big 4, Miss International 2021 and the two most recent editions of Miss Earth, Miss Earth 2020|2020 and Miss Earth 2021|2021 Deletion of Miss Supranational 2017 WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5732 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University Alliance in Talent Education Development User:Cewbot 00:02, 27 May 2020 (UTC) comment This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for |lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be '''eligible for |soft deletion''' at the end of its 7-day listing Deletion of University Alliance in Talent Education Development WP:NOQUORUM||WP:SOFTDELETE Wikipedia:Deletion process 72 +5733 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royal Confraternity of Sao Teotonio (2nd nomination) User:Orangemike 19:46, 2 April 2009 (UTC) delete """Non-notable ersatz """"order"""" (and I must join the chorus shouting, |Notability is not contagious (i.e., you can't make yourself notable by selling or giving something to somebody notable""" Deletion of Royal Confraternity of Sao Teotonio (2nd nomination) :WP:NOTCONTAGIOUS Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +5734 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badr Berrada User:Jack 11:18, 26 July 2020 (UTC) delete Coverage fails to meet the hurdle of or . Has the whiff of |UPE about it, and |Wikipedia is not for promotion Deletion of Badr Berrada WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG||WP:UPE||WP:NOTPROMO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5735 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draeden User:Aoidh 09:24, 20 September 2013 (UTC) delete Subject fails as it has zero third-party reliable sources. A merge might be appropriate, but even that's pushing it Deletion of Draeden WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5736 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Thomson Club User:Jmorrison230582 07:54, 1 December 2016 (UTC) delete """Scottish goalkeepers and the """"clean sheet"""" statistic exist, but the term """"John Thomson Club"""" is made up. Complete fantasy. """ Deletion of John Thomson Club WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5737 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ars Supernova User:Gongshow 18:35, 22 November 2009 (UTC) delete per nom's explanation, which are my findings as well. Sources seem limited to a local newspaper, an write-up in a university paper, and a few blogs. Does not appear to meet the criteria of Deletion of The Ars Supernova WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5738 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marion Crane (band) User:Yilloslime 22:28, 2 October 2009 (UTC) delete The only independent, reliable source cited is http://www.eujacksonville.com/. (Consensus at WP:RSN is that examiner.com is no better than a blog). I'd need to see media attention by more than the just the local alt weekly before believing that #1 is fulfilled and a wikipedia article is justified Deletion of Marion Crane (band) WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5739 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1001 Video Games You Must Play Before You Die User:Ginsengbomb 17:48, 3 January 2012 (UTC) keep per Sergecross73's source discoveries. Significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Reviews of a book are considered sufficient sourcing per Deletion of 1001 Video Games You Must Play Before You Die WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5740 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Shefman (third nomination) User:Obina 10:48, 25 February 2006 (UTC) delete Non notable. Per and precidents, this is not a notable nor national office. Local officials are not inherently notable, and this person not notable for other reasons. Can anyone guess how many similar people there are in just English speaking countries Deletion of Alan Shefman (third nomination) WP:BIO||WP:BLP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5741 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey Bond User:MurderByDeadcopy 05:54, 30 January 2016 (UTC) keep passes & per Collect Deletion of Joey Bond WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5742 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Crabtree (2nd nomination) User:Hatchens 13:07, 17 April 2021 (UTC) comment """Let's ignore the -thing for a moment. Getting a coverage at Financial Times- """"2018 Business Book of the Year Award"""" is highly absurd because he had been a https://www.jamescrabtree.com/bio/ former bureau chief of the same newspaper. Ok let's ignore the FT Awards... except his book and interviews... there is no such information exist about him as a """"person"""". This clearly shows that the entity lacks independent significant coverage... It's not what he said or wrote. It's about who he is. If not AfD, the page should/must be draftified. This opinion should be considered as an extended part of my nomination statement""" Deletion of James Crabtree (2nd nomination) WP:SPA Wikipedia:Single-purpose account 21 +5743 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3Sigma User:TParis00ap 00:26, 24 June 2010 (UTC) delete I searched not only this company but it's parent company as well and I could not find any notable/reliable sources. Anything I could find on this company seems to be advertisement. The author points to an advertisement video and the company's own website as reliable sources. The poor sourcing aside, I can't see anything notable or unique about this company that would warrent an article either to suggest there could be a source out there. I agree with nom, fails .--v/r Deletion of 3Sigma WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5744 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Film Creation Process User:Ignatzmice 14:20, 8 May 2013 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Film Creation Process WP:NOTESSAY Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5745 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PowerPoint party User:The 10:46, 13 March 2018 (UTC) delete """as lacking notability. Wikipedia's criteria for notability do no rest on potential """"future notability""""; hence, """ Deletion of PowerPoint party WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +5746 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rod Maxson User:Imzadi1979 03:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC) delete per nom. The article doesn't meet either Deletion of Rod Maxson WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5747 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daitetsu Minase User:JBsupreme 18:06, 24 November 2008 (UTC) delete and per nom this is getting ridiculous Deletion of Daitetsu Minase WP:SALT Wikipedia:Protection policy 0 +5748 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ocean Shores (Hong Kong) User:Noleander 03:02, 1 September 2011 (UTC) delete My research does not show sufficient ''independent'' sources that demonstrate notability. User Hmains raises a good point about the existence of 120 WP articles on similar buildings in Hong Kong, but that doesn't make ''this'' article notable (in fact, it just tells me that there are a lot of active WP editors in Hong Kong :-) ther stuff exists and all that Deletion of Ocean Shores (Hong Kong) WP:O Wikipedia:Orphan 48 +5749 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegro Realty Advisors User:Toddst1 02:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC) comment Special:Contributions/76.241.129.121|76.241.129.121 is a having only edits about Allegro Realty Advisors Deletion of Allegro Realty Advisors WP:SPA Wikipedia:Single-purpose account 21 +5750 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackie Weaver User:Qazwsx777 09:18, 11 February 2021 (UTC) merge It does certainly go against and as famous does not mean notable. The content is solid and well referenced so as per it should be merged into Handforth Parish Council or Cheshire East Council bullying and misconduct allegations Deletion of Jackie Weaver WP:BLP1E||WP:1E||WP:PRESERVE Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +5751 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NASCAR Criticism User:Koweja 23:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC) keep it's not a POV fork, it's a page split. See NASCAR#Criticism and . It should be moved to Criticism of NASCAR to keep in line with naming conventions, but the content is perfectly acceptable Deletion of NASCAR Criticism WP:SPINOUT Wikipedia:Article size 3 +5752 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AFI World 9s User:Pichpich 02:34, 19 August 2019 (UTC) delete I too can't find anything beyond the ministryofsport article which discusses the tournament but is more focused on the efforts of the AFI to generate worldwide interest in the sport. I think that's a bit too thin for meeting Deletion of AFI World 9s WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5753 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinity Lutheran School (Kaukauna, WI) User:Mandsford 22:41, 6 March 2011 (UTC) comment OK, we have a new contributor--- welcome to Wikipedia-- who might not be familiar with the general result concerning schools #Education. Basically, it's that high schools, like Fox Valley Lutheran, usually get their own article, while middle schools and elementary schools are referred to in the article about the school district it's located in (for a public school) or the school network or the town if it's a private school. In this case, it's part of the Fox Valley Lutheran School System, which may not have its own article; it could be redirected to Fox Valley High or to Kaukana, Wisconsin, or an article could be written about the school system Deletion of Trinity Lutheran School (Kaukauna, WI) WP:OUTCOMES Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +5754 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paper Blindness User:Deor 14:56, 25 June 2009 (UTC) delete Fails for want of |reliable sources Deletion of Paper Blindness WP:V||WP:RS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5755 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humayun Khan (soldier) User:Rhododendrites 12:45, 3 August 2016 (UTC) keep My thinking when creating the article on the parents was largely along the lines of what {{u|Cullen328}} says above, and how I described it on Talk:Khizr and Ghazala Khan|that talk page. There's no question that there's enough significant coverage of them to satisfy notability. I think there's more than enough to justify an article independent of the convention, too, given there have been new developments that have kept them among the top national headlines every day since the speech (e.g. just a few hours ago http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/03/us/politics/donald-trump-gop.html from the NY Times -- not the best source, because it's more about Trump than the Khans, but not all of the sources have to have them as the primary subject). There's a valid question of whether, per , it would make sense to move the article about the parents to an article about the speech (not the campaign/convention), but I think a biography is justified and that discussion can always happen down the road. &mdash Deletion of Humayun Khan (soldier) WP:BIO1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5756 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sagg Taqwacore Syndicate User:DoriSmith 00:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC) delete I don't see how they meet or Deletion of The Sagg Taqwacore Syndicate WP:BAND||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5757 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qantas Flight 32 User:Memset 21:25, 4 November 2010 (UTC) keep """due to extensive coverage in reliable sources. Citing by itself is not a reason for deletion, it needs to be proven that the event will have no lasting notability. """"Too recent"""" is not an argument (there is no such thing as """"recentism""""), and is not a guideline. It is to early to tell if the event has lasting notability or not, therefore the article should not be irreversibly deleted but kept for now""" Deletion of Qantas Flight 32 WP:NOTNEWS||WP:AIRCRASH Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5758 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samurai Aerobics User:Nihonjoe 08:22, 19 February 2010 (UTC) delete as completely-not-even-close-to-notable. The book it's based on isn't notable, and neither is the author of the book. This article fails to meet on every level Deletion of Samurai Aerobics WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5759 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Dude User:JeremyMcCracken 19:58, 19 April 2008 (UTC) merge per Fabrictramp for the first; '''speedy close''' for the other two- these need to go to |Redirects for Discussion Deletion of Little Dude WP:RFD Wikipedia:Redirect 73 +5760 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Ryckman User:Bearcat 07:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC) delete """City manager is not an """"inherently"""" notable role that guarantees an article under , especially not in a city with a population of just 11K — I live in a city with a population ''244 times'' the size of Corning, and ''our'' city managers have ''never'' had Wikipedia articles — but the article is not |reliably sourced anywhere near well enough to deem Ryckman more special than the norm""" Deletion of Mark Ryckman WP:NPOL||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5761 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EqualiTV(Canada) User:Blueboy96 23:26, 5 January 2011 (UTC) delete Doesn't appear to be on the air yet, so appears |crystalish at present Deletion of EqualiTV(Canada) WP:CBALL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5762 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FACES User:Joe 15:46, 26 December 2009 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of FACES WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5763 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Om Thanvi User:Shivkarandholiya12 13:22, 29 December 2018 (UTC) keep I am the one who created the article and see failure of . Subject meets per significant coverage by The Sunday Guardianhttps://www.sundayguardianlive.com/culture/modern-master-whose-passing-marks-end-era-indian-art, Aaj Takhttps://aajtak.intoday.in/story/bihari-puraskar-for-writer-journalist-om-thanvi-1-807852.html and other sources.https://www.bhadas4media.com/om-thanvi-patrika-group Deletion of Om Thanvi WP:BEFORE||WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +5764 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The ringworm children affair User:Davidruben 14:06, 22 October 2007 (UTC) merge """whilst I can't comment on specifics in Israel, the use of radiation therapy in otherwise potentially severe and difficult to treat scalp ringworm infection (in the days before griseofulvin) was not limited to Israel, but was also standard practice in the UK in the 1930's & 1940's, so the suggestion within the article (by its sole discussion on Israel experience) of it being a sinister experiment seems just a wild conspiracy theory (notwithstanding whether or not there was sterotyping of one group of Jews against another). I still occassionally come across elderly UK patients who were so treated and have had multiple recurrent localised skin tumors since. See {{PMID|17467352}} for a paper published this year about experiences of one hospital in London. A quick search on PubMed shows also recent papers of {{PMID|17209506}} from Tunisia, {{PMID|16896588}} from Germany, {{PMID|15565500}} Italy etc etc. The example in Israel is therefore not unique, and I know of no sinsiter conspiracy theory for radiotherapy's use elsewhere to treat this condition. Therefore if it was routine and """"the modern thing to do"""" in 1940's Britain, the sole dicussion of the use in Israel seems focus, for what should be just a sub-section in an article with more global perspective (eg Radiotherapy for scalp ringworm). Use of a journalistic headline title for a discussion solely about a non-English speaking country seems inappropriate here in English wikipedia, where our primary readers are those from English-speaking countries (Australia, Canada, Ireland, N.Z., S.Africa, UK, US etc""" Deletion of The ringworm children affair WP:UNDUE Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +5765 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Denner User:Guest9999 00:16, 26 March 2010 (UTC) comment the article has been cut down significantly in the run up to this discussion (see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Denner&oldid=336201519) by a user who I assume is the subject. The prior version contained some |uncited |biographical information but did give some sources which might be useful if it is decided to keep the article Deletion of John Denner WP:CITE||WP:BLP Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5766 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renaissance (demogroup) [[user talk:Kvng|KvnG]] 16:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC) delete Thanks for the useful and civil discussion. Unfortunately, is persuasive here. There is not adequate reliable coverage to write a verifiable article on this topic Deletion of Renaissance (demogroup) WP:WHYN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5767 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 Cricket World Cup User:Eludium 10:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC) keep Passes . Event is scheduled, notable, location is known, and is as certain to take place as anything twelve years hence can be Deletion of 2019 Cricket World Cup WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5768 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Kennedy (chemistry spokesperson) User:Deli 12:26, 8 October 2018 (UTC) comment As someone interested in food and chemistry, I'm familiar with the work of James Kennedy and I've seen his infographics in many places. But I'm not sure he meets criteria outlined at . I think his work trying to teach the public about chemophobia is worth mentioning somewhere on Wikipedia (Googling the term chemophobia and james kennedy turns up many results). He may be individually responsible for popularization of the term. At the very least, his name should redirect to that article Deletion of James Kennedy (chemistry spokesperson) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5769 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Old Days (Leroy Shield song) User:Squeamish 14:49, 23 May 2018 (UTC) keep No valid deletion criteria offered; potential mergers are an editorial matter, not a topic for AFD. ''That'' said, I also would oppose a merger here. ''Our Gang'' is a large article with a lot to cover, and there's no reason why accessory topics like this can't or shouldn't be |spun out. Additionally, while it doesn't even get a redlink, there's an argument to be made that Kaltenmeyer's Kindergarten is sufficiently notable for an article (our coverage of radio programs is maybe worse than our coverage of silent-era films!); in any case, this song was not exclusively associated with the ''Our Gang'' property. Is the article a stub? Yes, but ''stub'' doesn't always mean ''bad Deletion of Good Old Days (Leroy Shield song) WP:SPINOUT Wikipedia:Article size 3 +5770 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mimeo.com Inc. User:OSborn 05:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC) delete that quote above is from the article talk) I have read through the refs and am somewhat unimpressed. While a few do appear to be reliable coverage that could establish notability, the vast majority are PR. The article was clearly created for |advertising purposes and reads as advertising copy Deletion of Mimeo.com Inc. WP:ADVERT Wikipedia:Advertising 35 +5771 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharon Lebewohl User:K 05:12, 6 October 2018 (UTC) keep meets per review of available sources Deletion of Sharon Lebewohl WP:NAUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5772 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruby Granger User:Bearian 19:37, 28 January 2021 (UTC) delete per past outcomes (we tend to be strict on YouTubers), and ( she hasn't really ''done anything notable'', other than to be another teenager Deletion of Ruby Granger WP:GNG||WP:UPANDCOMING Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5773 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Honor Oak Christian Fellowship Centre [[User talk:180.172.239.231|talk]]) 12:40, 1 September 2014 (UTC) comment ping|Peterkingiron}} The article contains only one source, and I can't verify it. Hardly will this source |be considered '''neutral''', '''credible''' and '''sufficiently detailed''' for a comprehensive article. --Special:Contributions/180.172.239.231|180.172.239.231 Deletion of Honor Oak Christian Fellowship Centre WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5774 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curio (magazine) User:TerriersFan 00:31, 22 August 2007 (UTC) delete Bootleg (magazine). The reference indicates that it has been published but there are no s to indicate that it has any notability . A bad failure of Deletion of Curio (magazine) WP:RS||WP:N Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5775 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anzela Abbasi User:RebeccaGreen 09:58, 6 February 2019 (UTC) keep """Meets , with major roles in three blue-linked TV shows (""""Has had significant roles in multiple notable .. television shows""" Deletion of Anzela Abbasi WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5776 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bilişim Kulübü (second nomination) User:MER 10:08, 18 December 2006 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Bilişim Kulübü (second nomination) WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5777 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of national IQ estimates from Lynn and Vanhanen (2002, 2006) User:RJHall 21:38, 27 December 2011 (UTC) delete because of a lack of independent sources. I think this table is already adequately represented with the :File:InvertedIQbyCountry.png image used in the ''IQ and the Wealth of Nations'' article. The reasons supplied by the nom. carried no weight for me (with regard to this AfD) because they are irrelevant to the question of satisfying . Regards Deletion of List of national IQ estimates from Lynn and Vanhanen (2002, 2006) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5778 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airwolf Themes User:Trevj 02:37, 13 November 2013 (UTC) merge to Airwolf, per Deletion of Airwolf Themes WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5779 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meish Goldish User:Jayden54 10:02, 8 December 2006 (UTC) keep As SkierRMH said, he has written dozens of books, and I'm not sure if that means he's notable per the guidelines of , but for now I'm going to go with keeping the article, although a rewrite is certainly necessary Deletion of Meish Goldish WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5780 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Hui User:Walton_monarchist89 14:36, 9 April 2007 (UTC) keep """there are lots of references provided, but most are in Chinese (which I don't speak), so I can't tell whether they constitute """"multiple non-trivial coverage in independent sources"""" as required to meet . An opinion from a neutral Chinese speaker would be helpful here""" Deletion of Jack Hui WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5781 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles R. Borchers User:Bellhalla 23:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC) comment """Members of state legislature are considered notable as are holders of ''statewide'' offices. Mr. Borchers would be considered a local political figure under , and the threshold for inclusion in WP for local political figures is """"significant press coverage"""", which is not apparent from this article""" Deletion of Charles R. Borchers WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5782 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SamBakZa User:Wsiegmund 03:58, 21 March 2006 (UTC) delete The web site has an Alexa rank >900k. . http://www.alexa.com/data/details/?url=sambakza.net Deletion of SamBakZa WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5783 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/General stone User:Kinu 01:43, 7 February 2006 (UTC) delete Demos are ''not'' albums. If the album is yet to be released, it fails and the #Wikipedia is not a crystal ball|crystal ball Deletion of General stone WP:MUSIC||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5784 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Over Ashes User:Springnuts 17:44, 14 December 2008 (UTC) keep just meets the requirement for criterion 1 of . The key for me is that the reviews are not simply gushing praise; ie they are independent Deletion of Over Ashes WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5785 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Leycester Haymes User:RightCowLeftCoast 20:44, 8 October 2014 (UTC) keep """or '''redirect''' to Battle of Neuve Chapelle. Subject appears to meet criteria 6 of , """"Commanded a substantial body of troops in combat"""". Failing that the subject falls under and the article can be redirected to the battle where the subject's actions were notable at""" Deletion of Robert Leycester Haymes WP:SOLDIER||WP:BIO1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5786 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of volumes in ReViewing Chess (series) User:Sjakkalle 10:07, 18 November 2010 (UTC) delete The content is not an informational encylopedia article, nor does it serve any navigational purpose in binding together articles or serve any developmental purpose as suggested by . I agree with SyG's and Bubba73's comments Deletion of List of volumes in ReViewing Chess (series) WP:LIST Wikipedia:Lists 36 +5787 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren McLean User:Enos733 05:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC) delete for now (while allowing the article to be recreated in draft space). As others have stated, candidates are not presumed notable under . While there is a timing issue surrounding an AfD of a political candidate close to an election, the usual standard of a delayed AfD is about 8-10 days from an election (to account for one relist). As Bearcat points out above, there is a concern that Wikipedia could become a repository of campaign brochures in the waning days of an election (and I can attest, they do and they are hard to patrol especially when they come to AfD). In the interim, there is a possibility of a ''redirect'' to the 2019 Boise mayoral election Deletion of Lauren McLean WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5788 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debra Davenport User:Edwardx 15:01, 1 September 2018 (UTC) delete Fails . Even if notable, this puff piece would be a definite case of Deletion of Debra Davenport WP:GNG||WP:TNT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5789 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Gill, M.D. user:jfrank1 NONE comment """I created this page because David asked me to and someone not affiliated with the campaign or David continues to edit it. David certainly does meet the second bullet point on which by the way states """"This is not intended to be an exclusionary list. Just because someone doesn't fall into one of these categories doesn't mean an article on the person should automatically be deleted."""" You can't make it more clear than that. Whoever you are, I'd appreciate it if you'd stop this witch hunt. If you have problems with David, he'd be happy to discuss them with you- davidgill@gill2006.com As for the name of the article, there already was an article titled David Gill, so I needed something to distinguish the two and MD is what came to mind. Any particulare reason it should be changed? As for verifing that Doc donates blood, I didn't even know that until he told me himself. If you really want me to, I can have him contact the blood bank and post the record on the website or something""" Deletion of David Gill, M.D. WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5790 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chirundu.com User:Ecoleetage 17:22, 11 July 2008 (UTC) delete I hate to knock this one, given the situation in Zimbabwe today, but it fails and too easily Deletion of Chirundu.com WP:RS||WP:WEB Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5791 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Tse User:Artene50 08:07, 4 August 2012 (UTC) delete Sorry but this person currently fails Deletion of Sean Tse WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5792 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Mediacracy User:MelanieN 02:52, 30 November 2014 (UTC) delete Fails due to lack of coverage by Independent Reliable Sources. The only real source listed at the article gives this subject only a passing mention. In a search I found nothing to add Deletion of New Mediacracy WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5793 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcus Foligno User:Resolute 15:26, 29 May 2011 (UTC) keep per Dolovis. Foligno easily meets , though it would be nice if he would integrate the articles he found into an expanded article Deletion of Marcus Foligno WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5794 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarang Sathaye User:Malcolmxl5 12:47, 7 March 2015 (UTC) delete Lacking significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject to reach Deletion of Sarang Sathaye WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5795 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SONIC CRUISE User:Toon05 22:48, 29 December 2008 (UTC) delete no notability outside of the album, redirect all to album page, per Deletion of SONIC CRUISE WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5796 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Budgie (desktop environment) User:Syrenka 23:17, 6 September 2017 (UTC) keep Reliable sources do appear to exist: http://www.zdnet.com/article/hands-on-solus-linux-and-the-budgie-desktop/ ZDNet https://www.infoworld.com/article/3190875/linux/ubuntu-budgie-17-04-review.html ''InfoWorld'' http://www.datamation.com/open-source/best-new-linux-desktop-environments.html ''Datamation'' and possibly http://www.datamation.com/open-source/best-new-linux-desktop-environments.html ''OCS-Mag'' (the author for the last can be identified by name from the http://www.ocsmag.com/editors/ ''OCS-Mag'' Editors Page, though he uses a pseudonym in the article itself). The nominator cannot be blamed for not having done diligence on all of these, as some are so recent that they were published after the nomination! But they still establish notability and provide material to incorporate into the article Deletion of Budgie (desktop environment) WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +5797 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafael E. Pino User:PohranicniStraze 05:20, 11 October 2018 (UTC) delete Lack of independent reliable source coverage to establish notability under Deletion of Rafael E. Pino WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5798 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Agdam skirmish User:Nick 07:20, 30 January 2009 (UTC) delete Per #NEWS. I just checked, and this is different enough from the previous article (which was recreated after deletion) to not fit into a speedy deletion category Deletion of 2009 Agdam skirmish WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5799 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giblets F.C User:Peridon 20:58, 10 February 2011 (UTC) delete """and per nom. If you read the policies, you might see reasons. No-one is """"entitled"""" to a page. """"The non- notability issue is rendered pointless with the external link to the league website. It has many teams in many leagues."""" That merely proves existence. Please read and . If you really want to save the article, take notice of what we are saying. We are regular editors here - why would we bother using our time trying to delete something worthwhile? We try to help people with articles - when they are willing to be helped, as you seem not to be. Wikipedia is free - you didn't pay to come in. It is collaborative - this is a part of a collaborative process. Your article wasn't deleted at first sight by a supporter of Vale Madrid, or even by someone like us who had never heard of either you or them before. It's being discussed. But Wikipedia is not anarchy. It has rules. It's not free webspace - if you want that, you can get it at AboutUs or LinkedIn""" Deletion of Giblets F.C WP:RS||WP:V Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5800 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jentique Furniture Ltd User:AllyD 21:42, 2 November 2019 (UTC) delete """The company's lifespan preceded digital media, but even allowing for that, something more is needed for than occasional passing mentions. A merge with the :Metamec article might be an option, as they appear to have been part of the same group, but that would again need some of the solid sourcing which is wanting. Add to that the catalogue-ish tone of much of the current article (''""""there exists a small but devoted band of Jentique ash furniture collectors""""'', ''""""an affordable collectors' item prized for being attractive, well-made pieces""""'', etc.) and I am not seeing that this article can be sustained here""" Deletion of Jentique Furniture Ltd :WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5801 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mo Furu User:Necrothesp 14:18, 6 May 2014 (UTC) keep General officers are considered to be notable under Deletion of Mo Furu WP:SOLDIER Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5802 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WorldVenture User:Angusmclellan 22:14, 11 January 2007 (UTC) keep Searching Google Books for ''WorldVenture'' doesn't find a lot, but there are plenty trivial and not-so-trivial mentions of its older name, ''CBFMS'', and too many gnews archive hits to make weeding the out the trivial, obits which mention it in passing, very easy. Seems to me that this meets (''the scope of activities are national or international in scale and information can be verified by a third party source'') and . If it needs cleanup, clean it up, but it doesn't seem egregiously POV or spammy Deletion of WorldVenture WP:ORG||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5803 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wasim Akram (Producer) User:MichaelQSchmidt 20:21, 31 December 2011 (UTC) delete with enthusiasm. Unverifiability hints strongly of and along with similar film article ''Dead Morning'', as well as the director article Sridhar Teegala, and the ones for Gayathri (2013 film) and all created by |single purpose http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Wasirg User:Wasirg all seem to be set to promote the non-notable producer, his film company, and his films. None have verifiability Deletion of Wasim Akram (Producer) WP:HOAX||WP:SPA Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes 40 +5804 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuckservative User:BDD 17:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC) keep Indeed, there are piss-poor arguments and SPAs here, but I see multiple reliable sources writing specifically about this term. That's , friends Deletion of Cuckservative WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5805 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1944 D-Day Operation Overlord (videogame) User:Haemo 06:31, 27 July 2007 (UTC) delete as |crystal ballery. This is a game by an indie publisher with no fixed release date, which may (or may not) come out Deletion of 1944 D-Day Operation Overlord (videogame) WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5806 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Deacon User:Isotope23 12:44, 6 June 2006 (UTC) comment """It has nothing to do with, how cool or ugly his MySpace is. It has to do with meeting criteria and the evidence of meeting said criteria coming from verifiable, reliable sources. So far no evidence has been presented to show that Deacon meets (though Angus McLellan has advanced an arguable point). Appearing on a local NBC affiliate in any given city does not meet any criteria at either or , do that is irrelevant. Touring meets , but as you've said it has to be ''""""reported in notable and verifiable sources""""''. So, you would mind posting a link to the verifiable sources for Dan Deacon touring the United States""" Deletion of Dan Deacon WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC||WP:BIO||WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5807 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Earle Sullivan User:KidAd 23:59, 18 January 2021 (UTC) delete Non-notable activist is a glaring case of Deletion of John Earle Sullivan WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +5808 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DC3 (album) User:Theseeker4 14:27, 25 November 2008 (UTC) delete Not-yet-released album that has received no mainstream coverage by a non-notable performer. Fails all aspects of and as does the individual who made the album. Delete Deletion of DC3 (album) WP:MUSIC||WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5809 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egyptian Pong User:Satori 14:13, 11 December 2008 (UTC) delete """per : ''""""If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it""" Deletion of Egyptian Pong WP:VERIFY Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5810 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugena Washington NONE NONE keep Background: tagged for by the nominator ({{u|Sportsfan 1234}}) with the comment Deletion of Eugena Washington WP:PROD Wikipedia:Proposed deletion 92 +5811 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regional News Group User:SBKSPP 03:16, 15 May 2021 (UTC) delete """Fails per nom. Does not comply with since this is an """"umbrella"""" of programs formerly of ABS-CBN Regional""" Deletion of Regional News Group WP:GNG||WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5812 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmad Jawed User:Nipsonanomhmata 14:03, 23 April 2011 (UTC) delete In its current form I have to agree with WikiDan61. It doesn't meet or any other Wikipedia standard that I can think of Deletion of Ahmad Jawed WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5813 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of characters in The Simpsons by MBTI type (2nd nomination) User:RHaworth 18:20, 25 February 2008 (UTC) delete The first AfD was quite clear that this is pure |OR Deletion of List of characters in The Simpsons by MBTI type (2nd nomination) WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5814 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Cole User:Bart133 23:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC) delete I can't find any |reliable sources that demonstrate |notability of this article Deletion of Charlie Cole WP:RS||WP:N Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5815 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kai Frobel User:MichaelQSchmidt 07:04, 19 April 2009 (UTC) keep per asserted and found notability. Was this brought to AfD only to seek improvement? Even the nom agrees he seems notable. Per |WP:AFTER - In English: http://www.naturschutzbund.at/aktivitaeten/Projekte/gruenes_band/allg_info_gb_engl.html, http://sofiaecho.com/2009/03/04/684247_documentary-film-by-bbc-two-features-wildlife-in-bulgaria, http://www.europeangreenbelt.org/download/projects/Pan%20European%20Projects/Workshops%20for%20GB/Documents/Participants.pdf, http://tv.sky.com/natural-world-iron-curtain-ribbon-of-life, http://www.celotajs.lv/cont/prof/proj/GreenBelt/kickoff_programme.pdf, and in German: http://www.dradio.de/dlr/sendungen/gespraech/318933/, http://www.frankenpost.de/nachrichten/regional/laenderspiegel/art2388,850759, http://www.dradio.de/dlr/sendungen/gespraech/318933/?drucken, http://www.np-coburg.de/nachrichten/lokal/kronach/art2396,681433, http://www.n-tv.de/768186.html, http://www.focus.de/wissen/wissenschaft/artenschutz-ein-herz-fuer-biber_aid_176334.html, http://www.n-tv.de/672936.html, http://www.nrc.nl/buitenland/article1704746.ece/Een_groen_lint_waar_ooit_het_IJzeren_Gordijn_liep, et al Deletion of Kai Frobel WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +5816 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fetal psychology User:Bearian 16:32, 10 August 2016 (UTC) merge to prenatal and perinatal psychology. This is clearly |an ideological fork of an existing article, but I am willing to give the benefit of the doubt that it may be a common-enough search term. It should be protected to prevent re-creation without sysop intervention. If that is not feasible, then go ahead and delete, but make sure to |salt it in any case Deletion of Fetal psychology WP:FORK||WP:SALT Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks 84 +5817 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Bishop User:Artw 00:30, 8 April 2017 (UTC) keep Needs expansion and additional references but I would argue that as an editor of 2000ad and the Judge Dredd Megazine for a good portion of the 90s and in the process of that bringing a good deal of new talent into the comics industry, as well as being the instigator for the creation of several well known comics characters, he meets the 1st and 3rd critera of Deletion of David Bishop WP:CREATIVE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5818 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jai Durga Mitra Mandal User:onel5969 14:53, 17 October 2015 (UTC) delete Not enough out there to show they pass Deletion of Jai Durga Mitra Mandal WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5819 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Boston Rockers User:Pepsidrinka 19:11, 29 May 2007 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of The Boston Rockers WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5820 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebrity Sleuth User:Raaggio 16:54, 9 April 2010 (UTC) delete I don't even know how this article hasn't been eyed for deletion in a whole year; the subject is clearly not notable. I suggest a speedy delete per Deletion of Celebrity Sleuth WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +5821 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of 40-plus point games by Michael Jordan User:Darth 15:17, 26 April 2019 (UTC) comment We don't keep articles purely because Deletion of List of 40-plus point games by Michael Jordan WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +5822 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravensword 2: Shadowlands NONE NONE keep EC}} There is easily enough coverage to satisfy the . I've gone and bulked up the reception section with 5 or so reviews, but there's plenty out there Deletion of Ravensword 2: Shadowlands WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5823 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raynes Park High School User:Atmoz 17:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC) delete High schools are not inherently notable. http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Raynes+Park+High+School%22 Google shows WP as its first hit, and no other sources which provide independent third-party reliable sources with enough material for this ever to be more than a stub. http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Raynes+Park+High+School%22 GNews has a few links to articles such as http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/uk/newsid_3211000/3211835.stm this and http://www.watfordobserver.co.uk/news/1430338.print/ this. Fails Deletion of Raynes Park High School WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5824 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC 143 User:Hasteur 20:11, 25 April 2012 (UTC) delete There is a definition of what a notable MMA event is. It's called . Prose at Omnibus 2012 in UFC events for this is superior, well cited and communicates the points necessary. No need for a spin off Deletion of UFC 143 WP:MMANOT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5825 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megumi Tano User:Rms125a 20:06, 3 June 2016 (UTC) delete non-notable voice actress with minimal credentials. Maybe just |TOO SOON Deletion of Megumi Tano WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +5826 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rihards Gorkšs User:Jogurney 03:13, 11 September 2009 (UTC) keep Freimanis appears to meet per Skomorokh's research above; while Kalns, Soleičuks and Spole played in the UEFA Cup first round proper which should satisfy . None of the others have played in a fully-pro league, senior UEFA competition (other than qualifying rounds), or senior internationals. Some have played in the CIS Cup, but I don't think that would satisfy , and Azamat Baimatov claims to have played for his senior national team but I'm dubious of the claim since I can't verify it Deletion of Rihards Gorkšs WP:GNG||WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5827 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whiteblack User:Blue520 14:18, 7 May 2006 (UTC) delete interesting but & Deletion of Whiteblack WP:NOR||WP:V Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5828 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Taylor User:Dalahäst 03:56, 8 July 2015 (UTC) keep perhaps a borderline notability case before the recent events, but what's happened in the last week or so puts this article safely within the realm of notability, I think. It's true that |Wikipedia is not a newspaper, but this article isn't about an event and discusses more than just the recent firing. might apply if the article were solely about Victoria in light of her being fired, but it also describes the important role she held at Reddit prior to that happening. More content about her time at Reddit before being fired would definitely be a welcome addition, that said Deletion of Victoria Taylor WP:NOT||WP:BLP1E Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5829 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khabararmani.com User:Dragquennom 05:42, 1 May 2011 (UTC) delete Fails , no sources that indicate notability Deletion of Khabararmani.com WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5830 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newfoundland and Labrador First Party User:Edivorce 19:10, 14 March 2007 (UTC) keep notable, sufficiently sources, meets WP:ORG. is an essay- not a policy- not even a guideline. It is internally riddled with cautions and self limiting language. It should not be used to delete the work of other editors Deletion of Newfoundland and Labrador First Party WP:GOOGLE Wikipedia:Search engine test 49 +5831 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radha Krishn User:Username 12:50, 2 October 2018 (UTC) delete WP:CRYSTAL and [ Deletion of Radha Krishn WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +5832 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Coke, 8th Earl of Leicester User:Rpclod 14:12, 3 February 2018 (UTC) delete references are insufficient to support notability. Peers are not inherently notable Deletion of Thomas Coke, 8th Earl of Leicester WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5833 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theodis Bowe User:Thomas 17:47, 21 September 2009 (UTC) keep """per |Wikipedia's notability guidelines, which state that anyone who has """"competed at the fully professional level of a sport"""" is notable. Since he has played professional minor league baseball, he meets this guideline""" Deletion of Theodis Bowe WP:ATH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5834 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacy Layne Matthews User:StraussInTheHouse 16:56, 31 December 2018 (UTC) merge A source analysis which I shall provide below shows she's not really notable |outside the series. Most of the sources cited are |independent. I can't comment on their reliability because I'm unfamiliar with them. The significance of the coverage they give to her is questionable: they heavily ''mention'' her, but it is seemingly always in the context of her being on the RuPaul show, leading me to believe this is a case of |passing notability, and a probably failure of . However, |redirects are cheap, so pointing it to the TV show is probably the best bet Deletion of Stacy Layne Matthews WP:NOPAGE||WP:INDEPENDENT||WP:SUSTAINED||WP:BLP1E||WP:CHEAP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5835 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/bopo User:Kinu 14:03, 31 August 2006 (UTC) delete blatant Deletion of bopo WP:VSCA Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +5836 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sami Berik User:LlamaAl 17:41, 27 April 2013 (UTC) delete Fails and Deletion of Sami Berik WP:GNG||WP:NMMA Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5837 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 MLS SuperDraft (2nd nomination) User:Mentoz86 20:44, 27 February 2013 (UTC) delete per Deletion of 2015 MLS SuperDraft (2nd nomination) WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5838 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raffaele Di Gennaro User:GiantSnowman 09:36, 15 May 2012 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Raffaele Di Gennaro WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5839 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annabel (band) User:Andise1 NONE keep The sources in the article demonstrate notability and pass Deletion of Annabel (band) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5840 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moxie 88 User:Gongshow 08:05, 28 October 2017 (UTC) delete I'm not finding coverage to satisfy or Deletion of Moxie 88 WP:GNG||WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5841 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niz-r User:Malik 23:28, 4 January 2012 (UTC) delete No assertion of importance. Nominate it under |A7. —  Deletion of Niz-r WP:A7 Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +5842 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Machete (film) (2nd nomination) User:PC78 17:58, 16 February 2009 (UTC) delete or '''merge''' (don't mind which) per my nomination first time around. Whether this meets the GNG or not is besides the point; per the basic principles of , a few comments in the media about a film which may or may not go into production is not something tangible enough to warrant it's own article. If it is to be covered on Wikipedia at all, this material belongs elsewhere, such as at Robert Rodriguez Deletion of Machete (film) (2nd nomination) WP:NFF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5843 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of police stations in Karachi User:Noroton 21:42, 8 March 2008 (UTC) delete """Fails #DIRECTORY (""""Wikipedia is not a directory of everything that exists or has existed"""") in the most fundamental way. The whole spirit of that section of policy (and of the policy itself) is violated here. What is the purpose of this list? Lists are supposed to be useful to readers in understanding an encyclopedic subject or in finding their way around the encyclopedia (or both). This list isn't so long that it couldn't be included in an article about law enforcement in Karachi, a subject that would be welcome as an article if it can be written. But even in such an article, there should be some reason why the list would help the reader understand the subject or navigate""" Deletion of List of police stations in Karachi WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5844 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of wrestlers in WWE video games (2nd nomination) User:The1337gamer 15:33, 2 June 2015 (UTC) delete per and Deletion of List of wrestlers in WWE video games (2nd nomination) WP:LISTN||WP:LISTCRUFT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5845 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/They Are Billions User:Zxcvbnm 02:21, 20 December 2017 (UTC) delete As per nom. Popularity =/= notability Deletion of They Are Billions WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +5846 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metal Reviews User:Wafulz 16:49, 10 September 2006 (UTC) delete The website does not meet criteria set out in - the article itself mentions that the site is small, and it is written from a personal perspective. Anyway, http://www.alexa.com/search?q=www.metalreviews.com%2F Alexa ranking of about 750k, no awards, no news mentions, http://www.google.ca/search?q=link:http://www.metalreviews.com/&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&start=30&sa=N 33 links from other sites (mostly blogs and the like Deletion of Metal Reviews WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5847 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birlik, Kazakhstan User:Mandsford 00:50, 21 May 2010 (UTC) keep Dr. Blofeld has done an excellent job of adding sourced content to the article, so I hope this will close soon as a Deletion of Birlik, Kazakhstan WP:SNOW Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +5848 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobby Friss User:DustFormsWords 00:33, 20 October 2009 (UTC) delete doesn't appear to meet criteria at and in any case recommends the immediate deletion of all unsourced content from the biography of a living person, which here would result in blanking the article Deletion of Bobby Friss WP:NMUSIC||WP:BLP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5849 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Kids' Cookery School User:HighKing 12:27, 12 August 2019 (UTC) comment in response to the two Keep !votes above. This article is about the business, not about the founder - please read . The article contains more references but nothing has changes except the volume. Not a single one of the references that have been added meet the criteria for establishing notability - please read and especially ORGIND and CORPDEPTH. For example, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/foodanddrink/4815265/We-can-all-go-to-work-on-an-egg.html this Telegraph reference is classic churnalism and does not contain any Independent Content whatsoever, fails . Similarly the https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/life/features/giving-your-kids-a-taste-for-cookery-is-teaching-a-skill-for-life-35170701.html Belfast Telegraph reference contains quotations from Hamilton-Fairley and mentions the school as part of her title as Chief Executive. |Notability is not inherited. Article fails . The https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/fiona-hamiltonfairley/kids-cooking_b_4890244.html Huff Post reference is a PRIMARY source, published by Hamilton-Fairley and fails . The mention in https://www.deliciousmagazine.co.uk/kids-cookery-classes/ Delicious Magazine is part of a list of places that provide classes, fails and . The https://www.theguardian.com/society/2005/apr/12/lottery Guardian reference is marginally better but also fails Deletion of The Kids' Cookery School WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND||WP:NOTINHERIT||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +5850 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sootie User:Quarl NONE delete as |unverifiable protologism. &mdash Deletion of Sootie WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5851 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gavin Paul Carter User:Izzy007 23:28, 30 May 2008 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Gavin Paul Carter WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5852 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Small business idea User:Ohconfucius 03:01, 18 January 2007 (UTC) delete per #REPOSITORY and |#HOWTO Deletion of Small business idea WP:NOT||WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5853 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protestant Child Abuse User:Gwernol 10:39, 12 June 2008 (UTC) delete """the article is written with a partisan point of view. Given the issues raised above and the lack of any |sources that actually talk about systematic abuse within the """"Protestant Church"""", it would be inherently impossible for this article to ever meet . Indeed there is no single """"Protestant Church"""" as already noted, so this article cannot exist at this title. At least it would have to be retitled something like Evidence of child abuse within some Protestant churches. But given the sources are about child abuse across multiple faiths, why isn't this article Religious child abuse? The agenda here is very clear and is incompatible with the aims and policies of Wikipedia""" Deletion of Protestant Child Abuse WP:V||WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5854 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamalika Chanda User:MSJapan 17:37, 27 August 2016 (UTC) delete What the nom is referring to is the editor moving her name from near the bottom of the cast list to near the top. This grossly exaggerates the size of the role the subject had in the films in question. I've reverted those edits. As for notability, the subject doesn't appear other than by name ''once'' in several of the references, and she isn't mentioned otherwise in others. She did have a starring role in a film, but it appears to be a NN film, as its not even mentioned in the article of the person it's about. Basically, she's an adult film actress who fails and Deletion of Kamalika Chanda WP:NACTOR||WP:PORNBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5855 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royalty Check User:Joe 02:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC) delete Per Deletion of Royalty Check WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5856 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Forward User:Newshunter12 17:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC) delete Fails due to a complete lack of in independent reliable sources. Just a producer Deletion of Steve Forward WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RUNOFTHEMILL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5857 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gazza Music Productions User:BenKuykendall 05:46, 18 November 2018 (UTC) merge No hope of passing notability guidelines. But |redirects are cheap, and https://allafrica.com/stories/201809170537.html this mention is enough to refer to the production company in the Gazza article and redirect Deletion of Gazza Music Productions WP:CHEAP Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap 74 +5858 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molly Mormon User:TenPoundHammer 03:18, 31 July 2007 (UTC) keep article is more than a mere dicdef, is well referenced, and possible Deletion of Molly Mormon WP:POINT Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point 28 +5859 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InfoRegistry User:ArcAngel 14:14, 14 March 2008 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of InfoRegistry WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5860 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven Oaks (magazine) User:Icalanise 02:25, 30 January 2011 (UTC) delete non-notable, no sources in article meeting Deletion of Seven Oaks (magazine) WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5861 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Junior's Untitled fifth studio album User:Michaela 11:27, 19 July 2011 (UTC) delete """Wikipedia is not a collection of product announcements"""" per . The article is a collection of claims by various individuals that they are working on the album, with no official details eg name of album, lead tracks, release date, track listing etc. So """"it's not going to hurt you to wait"""", as so neatly summarized, then at least the article can be named properly rather than the generic """"fifth studio album""" Deletion of Super Junior's Untitled fifth studio album WP:FUTURE||WP:HAMMER Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5862 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Angel Locsin's Commercials and Endorsements User:Wisdom89 00:19, 30 March 2008 (UTC) delete per article content/POV |forking. If it becomes a problem in the future, perhaps , but I don't think that's the case here. Also, this list has some cruftiness to it. It's pretty unenyclopedic in nature Deletion of List of Angel Locsin's Commercials and Endorsements WP:FORK||WP:SALT Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks 84 +5863 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persecution of Biharis in Bangladesh User:Mar4d 04:34, 11 June 2013 (UTC) keep This is a very notable human rights issue and has extensive coverage in many academic sources. It is worth noting that the nominating editor identifies as Bangladeshi and has been previously involved in POV disputes in this article. This is obviously very important to note as there is high chance of involved behind this AfD. The editor in concern has made several attempts to remove content from the article which purportedly does not shed Bangladesh in a very positive light. Since he could not get his way, he decided to take the dispute to the AfD route. I do not recognise this AfD as valid since it is essentially an issue of opposing POVs. The article topic itself is highly notable. It appears that this AfD is a classic case of , and the single sentence nominating rationale goes to show that this is an attempt to whitewash and this notable topic away from the encyclopedia Deletion of Persecution of Biharis in Bangladesh WP:COI||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:CENSOR Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +5864 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Painter (2nd nomination) User:Edwardx 10:59, 3 July 2017 (UTC) keep """We have , but is a new one on me. This does not appear to be a valid argument for deletion. Apart from the two claims to notability the nominator mentions, #5 applies, """"5. The person holds or has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research""" Deletion of Richard Painter (2nd nomination) WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP2E||WP:NACADEMIC Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +5865 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stone Court User:Chris 11:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC) delete or '''Merge'''. Clear Deletion of Stone Court WP:NOTINHERITED Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +5866 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Might and Magic: The Dreamwright User:Boccobrock 04:16, 23 June 2008 (UTC) delete I think pretty much sums it up, it doesn't pass any of the criteria of notability Deletion of Might and Magic: The Dreamwright WP:BK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5867 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesus Christ as myth NONE NONE keep """Jesus-myth hypothesis is largely the original Jesus as Myth article, and deals with a fringe hypothesis. Jesus Christ as Myth deals - quite badly at present - with a much broader question of how far ancient mythology correlates to Christianity, in a much more mainstream way. Most scholars would hold that Christian traditions about Jesus were influenced to some extent by mythology - e.g. in terms of language like """"Son of God"""", etc - but wouldn't see it as undermining the knowability of history so much as the mythicists. There's also the """"Jesus as true myth"""" types . If the article were to try to deal with all these kinds of people, the Jesus-myth theory would (or, at least, should) be barely mentioned, per our #Undue Weight|Undue Weight policies. An article devoted to those kind of ideas can enable people to find this material much more easily""" Deletion of Jesus Christ as myth WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +5868 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Detlev Lauscher User:Vejvančický 15:08, 27 October 2010 (UTC) keep """Subject clearly meets |""""Wikipedia standards"""" for football players. Check http://www.fussballdaten.de/spieler/lauscherdetlev/ this link for verification, please. As for the circumstances of his death, see http://www.sport1.de/de/fussball/newspage_194491.html this link (requires knowledge of German language""" Deletion of Detlev Lauscher WP:FOOTYN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5869 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public domain book User:Savonneux 07:27, 20 August 2016 (UTC) delete I actually thought about nominating this about a week ago. Fails Deletion of Public domain book WP:SALAT Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists 51 +5870 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teamlorio.net User:Vic 09:19, 28 September 2006 (UTC) delete Having a tiny fan club does not meet Deletion of Teamlorio.net WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5871 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shelley Breen User:Tapered 01:28, 14 March 2017 (UTC) merge to Point of Grace. Only dedicated article I found is about her house in a specialist journal There are mentions in articles about Points of Grace, but only isn't . Lacks , but since google search gets significant hits, redirect to band's article Deletion of Shelley Breen WP:TRIVIAL||WP:NOTABILITY Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +5872 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endre Lund Eriksen User:Sam 11:22, 6 May 2016 (UTC) keep """Notability is based on |the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article. Had the mandatory |due diligence been performed prior to AfD nomination, a mere look at :no:Endre Lund Eriksen would have eliminated a mistake such as {{gi|Basically this amounts to """"writer who exists""""}} as subject indeed has received ''several'' notable awards making him likely to pass per . Award wins are however not currently part of the section of the SNG as seems to be implied here. But subject ''also'' passes : his breakthrough book ''Pitbull-Terje går amok'' ({{Literal translation|}} ''Pitbull-Terje runs amok'') was turned into the film ''Pitbullterje'' (2005), with manuscript by Lund Eriksen, and won the 2006 Amanda Award for Best Children and Youth Film. All this and more is now properly referenced in the article with citations to reliable, secondary sources. An abundance exist on subject making him easily ''also'' pass the SNG criterion ; why were these not found prior to nomination""" Deletion of Endre Lund Eriksen WP:NRVE||WP:BEFORE||WP:ANYBIO||WP:AUTHOR||WP:NBIO||WP:AUTHOR||WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5873 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piers Lauder User:Tyrenius 14:23, 17 September 2007 (UTC) merge Individual notability has not been established per adequate verifiable sources per Deletion of Piers Lauder WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5874 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick L. Schmersahl [[User talk:24.151.10.165|talk]]) 16:58, 19 February 2015 (UTC) keep per . Whether or not mayors of Hoboken are presumed notable as mayors of regionally significant cities, the multiple New York Times articles constitute significant coverage appropriate to the time period. Special:Contributions/24.151.10.165|24.151.10.165 Deletion of Frederick L. Schmersahl WP:BASIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5875 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of video game soundtracks released on vinyl User:ONUnicorn 01:29, 19 January 2015 (UTC) keep Lots of |reliable sources, and the mere fact that stuff like this is being released on vinyl in this day and age is interesting and possibly notable in and of itself Deletion of List of video game soundtracks released on vinyl WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5876 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Australian Ambassadors to Norway (2nd nomination) User:Lankiveil 10:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC) merge to Australia–Norway relations. As non-resident representatives, this particular office is clearly not important enough for its own article, and the articles cited are simply stuff that doesn't indicate that the office has much significance. A merge will preserve the useful information and give some depth to the resulting article Deletion of List of Australian Ambassadors to Norway (2nd nomination) WP:ROUTINE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5877 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JD Scott User:InverseHypercube 18:59, 26 September 2020 (UTC) keep The article meets the notability criteria for individuals in and . JD Scott has articles about them in notable secondary sources, such as ''The Rumpus''https://therumpus.net/2020/06/the-rumpus-interview-with-jd-scott/ and ''Electric Literature''https://electricliterature.com/all-the-best-weird-fiction-comes-from-florida/. They have also received notable awards, such as being a Lambda Literary Fellowhttps://www.lambdaliterary.org/faculty_and_fellows/jd-scott/ and being included in the ''Best New Poets'' anthology Deletion of JD Scott WP:BASIC||WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5878 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paris Hilton energy plan User:Deamon138 15:27, 26 August 2008 (UTC) merge verifiable enough event, but there's no need for a |spinout from the mother article, Paris Hilton, when it's only 42kB Deletion of Paris Hilton energy plan WP:SPINOUT Wikipedia:Article size 3 +5879 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Picaboo User:Crystallizedcarbon 11:06, 5 July 2017 (UTC) keep Bloomberg, TechCrunch and the WSJ provide more than just trivial mentions, so I believe that it barely meets our |general notability guidelines and that it does not violate |what Wikipedia is not. I have removed from the article the content sourced by the corporate page and the related references to eliminate the promotional tone. The remaining stub I believe meets, just barely, our criteria for inclusion. At the beginning of the article there is a disambiguation note pointing to Snapchat Deletion of Picaboo WP:GNG||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5880 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry Keith Ashwin User:GDX420 16:28, 22 October 2020 (UTC) comment Have we considered Deletion of Terry Keith Ashwin WP:ATD Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +5881 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Wagner User:W 14:28, 28 March 2007 (UTC) keep apparently got a lot of media coverage in the 1980s, including by the New York Times http://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&ned=us&ie=UTF-8&q=%22Bryan+Wagner%22+New+Orleans so that satisfies / Deletion of Bryan Wagner WP:A||WP:BIO Wikipedia:Attribution 34 +5882 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halis Aydemir User:Phil 16:33, 27 July 2011 (UTC) delete It would be unusual for anyone to have achieved the standards of so early in an academic career (PhD in 2004 and associate professorship since 2009) and there's nothing in the article or that I can find elsewhere to indicate that Halis Aydemir is an exception to that general trend. Turkish uses the Roman alphabet, so searching for the subject's name as written in the article would find Turkish as well as English sources if they existed. There's no need to understand a language to see that Google Books only finds books ''by'' the subject (two of the three being self-published via Lulu.com) and Wikipedia mirrors, that Google Scholar finds no citations to those books, and that Google News, which has wide coverage of the Turkish media, finds nothing Deletion of Halis Aydemir WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5883 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Reagle User:David 01:14, 7 March 2015 (UTC) merge or redirect to the book again per . Re Geogene's comment about biases: my experience with AfD discussions is that we are usually more critical, not less, when the subject is Wikipedia-related, but nevertheless I don't see any source of notability beyond the one book in this case Deletion of Joseph Reagle WP:BIO1E Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5884 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khetsingh Khangar User:VocalIndia 07:30, 7 April 2021 (UTC) keep Hindi Wikipedia https://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%96%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%82%E0%A4%B9_%E0%A4%96%E0%A4%82%E0%A4%97%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B0 article shown that the King is real ruler not a . I agree that the article needs a rewrite, but I've found enough sourcing to believe this King is strong notable see https://hindi.news18.com/news/uttar-pradesh/banda-banda-people-celebrates-maharaja-khet-singh-khangar-birth-anniversary-uptab-nodrj-2726680.html Thousands of people gathered at the procession to celebrate the birth anniversary of Maharaja Khet Singh Khangar in Banda, https://www.amarujala.com/uttar-pradesh/ghatampur/maharaja-khet-singh-jayanti-will-be-celebrated-in-sajeti, https://www.bhaskar.com/local/bihar/bhagalpur/forbesganj/news/maharaja-khet-singh-khangar-gave-the-message-of-sacrifice-and-sacrifice-128059159.html, https://www.livehindustan.com/uttar-pradesh/jhansi/story-maharaja-khet-singh-khangar-jubilee-celebrated-2925583.html Deletion of Khetsingh Khangar WP:HOAX Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes 40 +5885 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravi Kumar Panasa User:Theroadislong 07:57, 18 July 2018 (UTC) delete references are merely passing mentions with no in-depth coverage, fails Wikipedia:DIRECTOR and Deletion of Ravi Kumar Panasa WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5886 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alenka Hubacek User:Lankiveil 04:14, 2 May 2011 (UTC) delete while she meets the letter of , I'm not sure that a single wildcard doubles appearance, where she was soundly defeated by an unseeded player, really meets the ''spirit'' of that guideline. As good a time as any to Deletion of Alenka Hubacek WP:NTENNIS||WP:IAR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5887 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roland Legrand User:Joe 23:05, 30 December 2009 (UTC) delete I can't find significant coverage for this |person Deletion of Roland Legrand WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5888 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casus Belli (Jericho episode) User:Gtstricky 15:32, 30 November 2007 (UTC) delete changed from keep) per Deletion of Casus Belli (Jericho episode) WP:EPISODE Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +5889 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert G. Allen (author) (2nd nomination) User:A 01:29, 4 January 2010 (UTC) keep An advertisement? The tone is not promotional. Does not fulfill any purpose? The purpose is to provide encyclopedic coverage of a prominent author. AfD is not for cleanup. Notability concerns are not raised, but because they were in the first AfD: The subject of this article meets easily; as a matter of fact, he has http://www.amazon.com/Biography-Allen-Robert-Contemporary-Authors/dp/B0007SJU38/ref=sr_1_14?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1225860025&sr=1-14 an entry at Gale Contemporary Authors Deletion of Robert G. Allen (author) (2nd nomination) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5890 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Smart (author) User:Colapeninsula 15:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC) keep His book ''Clarity'' has coverage in the FThttp://www.ftadviser.com/2013/07/24/ifa-industry/your-business/book-review-clarity-by-jamie-smart-UbmRzKbrNgdm5jSb9Bru9J/article.html, London Timeshttp://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/life/food/article3732432.ece, a book from reputable publisher SAGEhttps://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Ol2mBgAAQBAJ&pg=PT117&lpg=PT117&dq=jamie+smart+clarity&source=bl&ots=lZe4SUMIS4&sig=RkW65JVG0GNC_kaG49UTCMk2zy8&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Dmk2VaTpFMyksgG6joCQBw&ved=0CCAQ6AEwADiWAQ#v=onepage&q=jamie%20smart%20clarity&f=false, and there's other sources listed (which may be briefer mentions). That puts either him or ''Clarity'' over the bar for or Deletion of Jamie Smart (author) WP:AUTHOR||WP:BKCRIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5891 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaiku.com User:72 03:50, 6 May 2007 (UTC) comment The #Criteria|criteria for notability (web) is very simple ...1. The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself.No one has provided any ''non-trivial published works'' that satisfy this criteria, and |blogs are not acceptable as reliable sources. &mdash Deletion of Jaiku.com WP:WEB||WP:SPS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5892 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prime Number Distribution Series User:Smmurphy 15:56, 14 August 2017 (UTC) delete without more independent coverage, this fails (and NOR and ). I'm not sure if what the article says is true, and I agree with XOR'easter that FRINGE concerns may apply as well Deletion of Prime Number Distribution Series WP:V||WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5893 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aristean calendar User:Assize 04:21, 22 August 2007 (UTC) delete This is original research . The secondary sources only demonstrate that the person who invented this concept has had trouble getting somebody to take his concept seriously. His concept has only been mentioned in passing and nobody has conducted an indepth review of the concept, rather than the novelty of it. This is one instead for WikiNews Deletion of Aristean calendar WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5894 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional characters by IQ User:Bearian 15:55, 9 April 2008 (UTC) keep such a specific list is allowed by . Every entry has a citation, which is |verifiable, although they could be |better. Yes, the test for speedy deletion is fairly lax, but |the main articles for deletion page explicitly lists the |reasons for deletion. Each of the characters are |major ''persona'' in |fictional works. I can't see any reasons to delete, and to keep is the default setting. I have a lax reason to keep: a high school student may find the list useful for research Deletion of List of fictional characters by IQ WP:LIST||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:AFD||WP:DELETE||WP:N||WP:FICTION Wikipedia:Lists 36 +5895 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Ciccone User:John537 16:27, 21 August 2020 (UTC) delete """Well, that's ten minutes of my life I'm not getting back ... see, I just went over the """"sources"""" recently added, and they're a bunch of cast lists, user-generated bits and namedrops. Not a single damn one provides |significant coverage ''to the subject'', as the GNG requires. In the filibustering above""" Deletion of Tony Ciccone WP:SIGCOV Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5896 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phonon renormalization in the single-mode spin-boson Hamiltonian User:Colonel 06:30, 13 May 2010 (UTC) delete per PAPER Deletion of Phonon renormalization in the single-mode spin-boson Hamiltonian WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5897 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Bohemian F.C. players User:Alzarian16 19:06, 29 August 2011 (UTC) delete When I first saw this list I was relatively supportive of the concept as a way of removing loads of unreferenced biographies. I even merged an article here. Trouble is, sourcing it seems to be almost impossible. The only source at present is a Wiki mirror, and the only results I could find by searching for the two players on the list at the moment were some random news reports with no real information and http://www.footballdatabase.eu/football.joueurs.tommy.byrne.110727.en.html this, which is demonstrably inaccurate by at least eight years. So apparently a list like this is going to fail , unless someone knows better, in which case I'll reconsider Deletion of List of Bohemian F.C. players WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5898 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The black and white tour User:Esradekan 12:38, 24 May 2009 (UTC) delete a non-notable tour that fails to satisfy the |general notability guideline and File:Crystalball.jpg|20px with significant coverage in |reliable, third-party, sources Deletion of The black and white tour WP:GNG||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5899 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rechtub klat User:Princess 16:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC) delete per the above - protologism & |kscollob Deletion of Rechtub klat WP:BOLLOCKS Wikipedia:Complete bollocks 62 +5900 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Historical deviations in Gladiator (2000 film) User:Erik 16:16, 10 January 2009 (UTC) merge """only'' content backed by |reliable sources that comment on the film through a historical lens to Gladiator (2000 film). Hard to believe that those who are voting """"keep"""" do not see that the article is mostly |synthesis because most of the sources in the article are not even related to the film. It's basically akin to picking up a history textbook and investigating the fallacies of a ''creative work'' on your own, so the claim that the article is """"well-referenced"""" is flawed. For such a high-profile film like this, there will be commentary by historians on the film itself, as evidenced by the smaller number of sources in the current article. There are also similar sources at the film article's historical section... when proper clean-up is done to purge synthesis, all useful information can be kept in that particular historical section. There is ''also'' the concern that this article is a since it focuses on how this film (remember, it is a creative work) does not match up to actual history and does not say what, if anything, Ridley Scott got right about depicting the time period""" Deletion of Historical deviations in Gladiator (2000 film) WP:RS||WP:SYN||WP:POVFORK Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5901 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Mohammad Husaini User:Sleddog116 14:49, 12 February 2020 (UTC) delete The article doesn't establish any independent notability of the subject beyond grandiose adjectives. The only reference links to a blank web hosting page, and I'm struggling to find any other sources on this topic. So it meets neither nor Deletion of Syed Mohammad Husaini WP:N||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5902 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Table of divisors NONE NONE comment First of all, this all needs to be referenced presumably, or at least the source code used to generate the page needs to be posted in order to conduct an audit of it. Otherwise, as a '''reference about numbers''', it's unverifiable. Secondly, I find it a bit of a stretch to say that this is any kind of useful reference at all. But be that as it may, the policy specifically states Deletion of Table of divisors WP:NOT Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5903 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultimate X-Men (story arcs) (2nd nomination) User:Crystallina 14:59, 31 December 2006 (UTC) delete regardless of the first AfD, this is still unsourced - see - and questionable per the guidelines Deletion of Ultimate X-Men (story arcs) (2nd nomination) WP:RS||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5904 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Stick Cricket versions [[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 00:22, 6 April 2009 (UTC) delete """I would be tempted to say """"merge"""", but after looking at some contribs and article history, I don't think there is anything verifiable here to merge; it's almost completely |original research""" Deletion of List of Stick Cricket versions WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5905 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Englishman in L.A. User:Northamerica1000 10:37, 31 January 2017 (UTC) delete After searching around, unless I'm missing something, not finding any coverage in reliable sources. Fails Deletion of Englishman in L.A. WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5906 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Springfield Raceway User:Ravenswing 15:16, 14 October 2010 (UTC) delete Would you like to cite any policy grounds upon which to advocate keeping the article? As far as I can see, |launching a personal attack on the nom is not generally considered a valid one. That aside, there are ''zero'' sources and ''zero'' hits on G-News to anything beyond race results in the local newspaper Deletion of Springfield Raceway WP:NPA Wikipedia:No personal attacks 17 +5907 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Belanger (2nd nomination) :Usernames_for_administrator_attention&diff=287047446&oldid=287045132] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3AKheperu]. Now on this new trend of continuous attempts at bringing back this article in consecutive AfD/DRV requests, I want to mention that not all of the issues with NPOV were addressed, and that the articles' language does not fully comply with a scholarly accepted encyclopedic style. Stating that an individual is a ''psychic vampire'' is not appropriate in an encyclopedia, since it is subject to personal belief. It would be like stating that someone is an alien from Mars, if that was his belief or the belief of his personal cult. An encyclopedia must present well researched and established facts, not personal opinions or beliefs. This points to a conflict with NPOV on the proposed new version of the article. Adding to that, most of the new sources that were provided do not really comply with the [[Wikipedia:RS|RS]] policy, which clearly should not be user-uploaded images on imageshack or articles that just refer the subject or interview him, but do not review his work or discuss him in detail. There is not one single in depth reference addressing this individual from a single reliable source. This is not an indicator of notability NONE delete This article was previously deleted by Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Michelle_Belanger|AfD because it was considered promotional in a clear violation of the |NPOV policy and failing the |notability guidelines in Wikipedia standards. After its closure by a general consensus, it was again endorsed for deletion at a previous Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_April_29|DRV for the exact same reason, in a once again very clear attempt at relaunching the promotional activity for this individual by herself or her agent. That DRV was requested by an user who's single edit was to open that deletion review, using an account with the name of Belanger's ''vampire cult''. That same account {{user|Kheperu}} was blocked as a ole account|role account. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia Deletion of Michelle Belanger (2nd nomination) WP:NPOV||WP:N||WP:R Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +5908 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sadia Khan (model) User:NickW557 06:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC) delete seems to be a failure. I can find primary sources, non-reliable blogs & fan sites, but no significant coverage in sources that would help establish notability Deletion of Sadia Khan (model) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5909 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (fifth nomination) User:Masterpiece2000 06:54, 12 July 2008 (UTC) keep """It is a notable article. The article is heavily referenced and the sources are reliable. I don’t think the article is based almost entirely on |original research and |synthesized research. I don’t agree that no body of literature exists that discusses """"allegations of apartheid"""" or """"the apartheid analogy"""" in a general sense. In the article, reliable sources are tied together by the """"apartheid"""" concept""" Deletion of Allegations of apartheid (fifth nomination) WP:OR||WP:SYNTH Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5910 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satish Chandra Agrawal User:Bgwhite 06:08, 31 October 2011 (UTC) keep per he is inherently notable regardless of how little sources there are to be found Deletion of Satish Chandra Agrawal WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5911 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kill the Silence technique (disambiguation) User:Joe 18:44, 26 October 2009 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Kill the Silence technique (disambiguation) WP:DAB Wikipedia:Disambiguation 64 +5912 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avi Tuschman User:Joseph2302 11:26, 30 May 2015 (UTC) keep as Our Political Nature- the book seems to pass , although I believe that the person themself isn't notable enough Deletion of Avi Tuschman WP:NBOOK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5913 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Miller (actor) User:Ad 20:34, 15 April 2014 (UTC) keep Subject meets . The article is in bad need of RS references though and I have tagged it accordingly Deletion of Nick Miller (actor) WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5914 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get Rude User:4meter4 00:34, 30 September 2019 (UTC) delete Fails Deletion of Get Rude WP:NALBUM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5915 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheikh chilli User:MER 12:53, 3 February 2007 (UTC) delete appears to be a non-notable |neologism Deletion of Sheikh chilli WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +5916 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacPaw (2nd nomination) [[User talk:94.153.69.197#top|talk]]) 09:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC) keep The article has strong references including Forbes, TechCrunch, Entrepreneur. I think it is in line with . I have found 2 references in books about their products: https://www.google.com.ua/books/edition/Take_Control_of_Managing_Your_Files/6NsPEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=macpaw&pg=PA74&printsec=frontcover and https://www.google.com.ua/books/edition/iMac_For_Dummies/a05ZAwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=macpaw&pg=PT495&printsec=frontcover. Maybe, the article should be edited and rewritten in a more neutral voice without product list. — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/94.153.69.197|94.153.69.197 Deletion of MacPaw (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5917 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Lucey User:Jenuk1985 19:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC) keep Definitely meets , no sources is not a valid reason to delete an article, should be tagged as unreferenced. It appears the nominator has nominated a collection of Irish related articles with little knowledge of the sports in general Deletion of Stephen Lucey WP:ATHLETE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5918 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magellan Guides User:Davidpdx 12:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC) delete as also fails Deletion of Magellan Guides WP:SPAM||WP:V Wikipedia:Spam 26 +5919 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoshi (band) User:N2e 02:49, 4 April 2010 (UTC) delete no notability demonstrated in a |reliable secondary source Deletion of Yoshi (band) WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5920 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antisemitic boycotts User:Joe 08:16, 31 August 2020 (UTC) delete """I agree that this is , plus a |POV fork of several existing articles on individual boycotts. The keeps above miss the point: yes, some sources make links between various boycotts and antisemitism, but that doesn't mean that """"antisemitic boycotts"""" is in itself a notable topic. For that we would need to see significant coverage that treats these boycotts together as a coherent topic, distinct from other forms of antisemitism, and under the |common name of """"antisemitic boycotts"""". Apart from the one JVL sourcehttps://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/anti-jewish-boycotts the nominator mentions, that coverage doesn't appear to exist. The historic boycotts are either discussed as independent events or as manifestations of antisemitism more broadly. The disputed position that links historic antisemitic boycotts to contemporary boycotts of Israel is already covered in a more balanced way at Boycotts of Israel. – """ Deletion of Antisemitic boycotts WP:SYNTH||WP:POVFORK||WP:COMMONNAME Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5921 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carrot Cake Murder: A Hannah Swensen Mystery User:Northamerica1000 15:42, 27 February 2015 (UTC) keep Meets criteria #1 per the reviews above Deletion of Carrot Cake Murder: A Hannah Swensen Mystery WP:BKCRIT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5922 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John M. Anastasatos User:Chalk19 NONE comment The user above has https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/GogouAnastasia&offset=&limit=500&target=GogouAnastasia contributions only on John M. Anastasatos. Maybe there is a with her subject Deletion of John M. Anastasatos WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +5923 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar ventilation User:Empty 11:10, 1 July 2010 (UTC) merge to one of the above or Solar air heat. Editor has also created Solar air collector and SUN ECO AIR today, all three with a highly tone and all solely referenced with links to a single company that sells this technology. SUN ECO AIR has just been speedied as spam Deletion of Solar ventilation WP:PROMO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5924 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denver Film Critics Society User:Neonorange 05:57, 20 January 2017 (UTC) delete My first reaction was to ''assume'' the DSFC to be otability|Wikipedia-notable—Denver is a 19th largest U.S. MSA, the film critic for the ''The Denver Post'' (12th in U.S. daily circulation) is an elected member of the National Society of Film Critics—the only mentions of the DFCS I can find consist entirely of nominations and awards given. The DSFC has a Facebook page, a Twitter account, and an IMDB mention—all mostly empty. I found one hit at http://www.denverpost.com/2012/01/10/denver-film-critics-society-names-winners/|''The Denver Post''—just another list of awards given. I also checked ''American Film''—nothing there Deletion of Denver Film Critics Society WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5925 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie West User:Richard3120 17:32, 8 June 2018 (UTC) delete fails and . Any independent coverage of Mr. West is related to him winning a busking competition nine years ago https://www.standard.co.uk/news/boriss-busk-off-23-year-old-wins-licence-to-play-on-underground-6722747.html, and there has been nothing since then. The rest of the article is self-promotional and citing only Mr. West's own social media Deletion of Jamie West WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:ONEEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5926 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florence Devouard (3rd nomination) NONE NONE keep as Deletion of Florence Devouard (3rd nomination) WP:ANYBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5927 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scottish space school User:TerriersFan 21:45, 16 August 2007 (UTC) keep let's be clear; despite its gimmicky title this is not a school and is not spam - it is a government education programme, organised jointly with NASA. Government programmes are generally considered notable. In this case is easily met by a wealth of media coverage. Another reference is http://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=149235&command=displayContent&sourceNode=149218&contentPK=17602405&moduleName=InternalSearch&formname=sidebarsearch here. I am going to rewrite the article to make its status clear Deletion of Scottish space school WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5928 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Horwitz (2nd nomination) User:NeoChaosX 09:42, 25 March 2007 (UTC) delete as the person is in no way meeting the notability guideline Deletion of Jim Horwitz (2nd nomination) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5929 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erika Tymrak User:Dirtlawyer1 12:41, 23 October 2010 (UTC) delete Subject player is not a professional, has not played for a senior U.S. national team, and is no more or less notable than several of her current Florida Gators teammates. If she were a first-team All-American in her sport, I believe a case could be made under the general notability standards . . . but not yet Deletion of Erika Tymrak WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5930 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Paya (2nd nomination) User:Colapeninsula 11:19, 15 March 2012 (UTC) comment Per : http://www.westminster.ac.uk/about-us/directory/paya,-ali this indicates he doesn't hold a high enough position (just assistant/visiting professor); Google Scholar shows minimal cites. I can't read Persian, but the English-language sources are lacking Deletion of Ali Paya (2nd nomination) WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5931 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jokers' Masquerade (2nd nomination) User:Money 02:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC) keep The sources for the article are quite shoddy now (2 primary, other 2 are for a unimpressive world record), but a search revealed that this company has continually caused controversy in Britain over the last few years, such as when they sold an https://metro.co.uk/2018/10/09/blade-gunner-costume-lets-you-dress-up-as-killer-oscar-pistorius-for-halloween-8020484/ Oscar Pistorius costume (complete with toy gun!), a https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-berkshire-29718923 psych ward costume that was https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2014/oct/31/halloween-costume-mental-illness-prime-minister-norman-lamb condemned as rienforcing stereotypes, https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-33451674 and were forced to surrender one of their star wars domain names to disney. I couldn't find anything supporting the unimpressive hitwise awards and will remove their mention, along with the primary sources, but I think this just barely passes Deletion of Jokers' Masquerade (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5932 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Coughlan (football) User:MrWooHoo 00:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC) keep Meets and meets per Nfitz and Fenix Deletion of Tom Coughlan (football) WP:SECONDARY||WP:GNG Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5933 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TO THE NEW User:Masumrezarock100 06:36, 26 June 2019 (UTC) delete per nom. Fails and and what's up with that page title Deletion of TO THE NEW WP:GNG||WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5934 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamaskan Dog User:Isotope23 20:49, 21 November 2006 (UTC) delete as this cannot be |verified by |reliable sources Deletion of Tamaskan Dog WP:V||WP:RS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5935 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Rubbo User:Likeminas 23:51, 22 July 2010 (UTC) delete fails Deletion of Donald Rubbo WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5936 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kia Jam User:FOARP 08:52, 14 November 2019 (UTC) delete WP:BLP1E is not a stand-alone , but typically a reason to rename/redirect/merge articles about the person into the article covering the event they are notable for. It should only result in straight deletion where the event you would otherwise rename/redirect to is itself not notable. In this case, the event (the fraud case) appears to be potentially not notable due to lack of evidence of impact (it was covered in May 2019 but not since) meaning this fails , and is possibly also a fail. As such there is no event to merge to. If this guy goes any further in the film-production business we may end up recreating this article, but for the moment we've got simple bare-mentions of him producing a single film in a couple of trade magazine articles Deletion of Kia Jam WP:DELREASON||WP:LASTING||WP:NEVENT||WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:Deletion policy 19 +5937 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcus Lindblom User:ThomasO1989 15:36, 10 July 2014 (UTC) keep Although wouldn't ordinarily apply to a video game localiser, he has coverage in multiple sources to meet . Also, sources have specifically and in detail focused on his work as a localiser, so you could make the case that his localisation is itself a work of art that has received critical attention, meeting that way. does not apply to creative works: you're still notable as a writer (etc) even if you've only written 1 book (etc), if you meet . Despite what Deletion of Marcus Lindblom WP:CREATIVE||WP:GNG||WP:CREATIVE||WP:BLP1E||WP:CREATIVE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5938 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babs and Buster Bunny User:Neier 22:21, 12 November 2008 (UTC) keep most all of these are likely search terms, and could be redirected to the main TT article without requiring an AFD per Deletion of Babs and Buster Bunny WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +5939 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julissa Dávila User:Hhhhhkohhhhh 13:42, 11 January 2018 (UTC) delete Fail Deletion of Julissa Dávila WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5940 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cradle of Faith User:JNW 21:40, 16 June 2009 (UTC) delete per nom. Whether hoax or non-notable, this is a candidate for . Or feel free to use the rationale I created, Deletion of Cradle of Faith WP:SNOW||WP:LOAP Wikipedia:Snowball clause 87 +5941 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J-Office User:Pmedema 01:41, 12 October 2010 (UTC) delete One of the very many Java/office suites that just does not pass Other then it has no notability Deletion of J-Office WP:N||WP:ITEXISTS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5942 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Simmons (baseball player) User:Jaranda 23:30, 3 July 2007 (UTC) delete as failing , non-notable minor league draft picks Deletion of James Simmons (baseball player) WP:BIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5943 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the alleged Qur'an scientific miracles User:Matt57 05:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC) delete As I mentioned on the article's talk page, this page doesnt need to exist. Imad should stop all this Islam/science stuff. Imad, please read . We really dont need more problems in Islam related articles than we already have Deletion of List of the alleged Qur'an scientific miracles WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5944 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big White Tiger LLC User:ResidentAnthropologist 18:17, 14 November 2010 (UTC) delete unable to find multiple RS providing Significant coverage. Thus Failing Deletion of Big White Tiger LLC WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5945 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lokalise User:4meter4 12:08, 23 September 2019 (UTC) delete fails to meet the criteria at and Deletion of Lokalise WP:NSOFT||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5946 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spliff politics User:HisSpaceResearch 17:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC) comment I don't smoke pot myself and I have heard of this concept, the 'politics' of smoking cannabis, from a friend of mine who does. This may actually be notable, but it's that's the problem here. If we could try Googling for sources that may be helpful but probably not due to likely lack of Deletion of Spliff politics WP:V||WP:RS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5947 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire department rehab User:Bejnar 07:41, 17 June 2013 (UTC) keep mostly because deletion is not cleanup. The nominator said: ''That there would be health services available to firefighters really goes without saying.'' But if one reads the introduction to the USFA Emergency Incident Rehab Manual, FA-114 one sees that that was not so obvious. That manual and the FireRehab.com site provide verifiability. I would urge the nominator to give up this Afd, and after it is over, to ruthlessly remove the |original research from the article, with appropriate comments on the talk page towards improving the article within Wikipedia guidelines Deletion of Fire department rehab :WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5948 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Kirksey User:Sticky 01:28, 22 October 2008 (UTC) delete no notability, probably written by someone with a in my humble opinion Deletion of Lee Kirksey WP:COI Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 59 +5949 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centres of influence User:Nosebagbear 08:33, 10 April 2018 (UTC) comment """reply to|Otr500}} regarding What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a dictionary|""""Wikipedia is not a dictionary"""" - only the first line is sole definition, which is standard form. The second part regards things to bear in mind about usage, and the latter considerations about those being included. Regarding it doesn't seem to violate any of the standard given variations. General Notability (more specifically, lacking it) would seem the primary grounds to reject this, and I feel it avoids that, just. p.s. wasn't sure of correct procedure to provide an AfD response severed from comment with a relist - apologies if incorrect""" Deletion of Centres of influence WP:INDISCRIMINATE Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5950 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint David's School (New York City) User:Kudpung 06:26, 29 April 2011 (UTC) keep If I had seen the CSD I would have declined it too as the article certainly makes claims to notability. It has come a very long way since it was created as a tiny stub in 2009 and many editors have contributed to making it a clean school page. The school appears to be far more worthy of mention than a great many primary school articles (although of course, a converse rationale is inadmissible). Most of the referenced sources however, appear to be mainly concerned with alumni and do not support notability for the school as their personal notability cannot be inherited. One of the http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F50915FA3C5A117A93C5A9178DD85F478585F9 reliable sources that may have more in depth coverage is behind a pay-wall, while the other http://www.nytimes.com/1991/12/24/style/chronicle-404791.html NYT article lends more weight to arguments for notability. My only serious reserve is that it reads a tad promotional, but this can be rectified - I might even have a go at it myself if it is kept. So my overall opinion is 'keep Deletion of Saint David's School (New York City) WP:OTHERSTUFF Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +5951 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of professional wrestling promotions in Australia User:AinslieL 08:33, 13 June 2010 (UTC) delete per Mal Case also under |CSD G12 Deletion of List of professional wrestling promotions in Australia WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +5952 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Imeson User:Bob 20:47, 16 May 2011 (UTC) delete WP:PERP and , we aren't a database of bog-standard criminals Deletion of Jesse Imeson WP:ONEVENT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5953 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Aaker User:EricEnfermero 15:26, 9 May 2015 (UTC) keep We may be able to cut down on some promotional tone, but this has a lot of sourced prose, so it isn't too much like a resume and wouldn't require a rewrite. Some bulleted sections are allowed, particularly in standard WP biography sections like Publications or Bibliography (which might just be better renamed ''Further reading''). The subject is definitely notable per and (at least because of holding a named chair at a major university, possibly other criteria Deletion of Jennifer Aaker WP:GNG||WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5954 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobiscope User:MuZemike 18:18, 24 December 2008 (UTC) delete Notable or not, this is |blatant advertisement Deletion of Mobiscope WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Spam 26 +5955 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerkcity User:BradBeattie 07:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC) comment I brought it to AFD as I honestly believe it comes close to #A7, which states that an article is subject to speedy deletion if it ''does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. If the assertion is controversial or there has been a previous AfD, the article should be nominated for AfD instead Deletion of Jerkcity WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +5956 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Money as Debt (4th nomination) User:Yworo 16:48, 26 August 2013 (UTC) keep clearly meets Deletion of Money as Debt (4th nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5957 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of radiata animal orders User:Nick 10:52, 28 August 2018 (UTC) delete """I agree with the rationale eloquently put forward by the OP and of {{u|Spinningspark}}. Artificially forcing modern taxa into this list is definitely , especially as there were clear shifting sands of the meaning of the group, and no references have been put forward to support it. The summary at Radiata seems to suffice, and I agree there's little value in turning this into a redirect. I would not expect to find a """"List of Vermes animal orders"""", but would expect to find a reasonable explanation of what both now-abandoned groupings meant to naturalists at the time, and over the centuries that followed""" Deletion of List of radiata animal orders WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +5958 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Khalife User:Pharaoh 18:27, 30 December 2020 (UTC) keep passes Deletion of Peter Khalife WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5959 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jokin Ezkieta User:GiantSnowman 20:29, 27 April 2016 (UTC) delete fails and Deletion of Jokin Ezkieta WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5960 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liverpool F.C. 4–0 FC Barcelona User:Crowsus 20:21, 29 August 2020 (UTC) merge as it falls on the upper end of and , definitely a dramatic event and significant in the Euro histories of Liverpool and Barça, much of the content could be moved to their Euro articles if it hasn't already. But the result itself didn't break any records so I'm not really convinced of its long-term notability in terms of the scoreline itself, as the years pass it will likely be remembered that Liverpool got a big comeback, Barcelona had a defensive collapse (becoming their trademark) and Origi scored that mad goal from a corner, and that will be/already is recorded in various articles in some way Deletion of Liverpool F.C. 4–0 FC Barcelona WP:MILL||WP:RECENTISM Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill 32 +5961 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irina Berezhna User:Unscintillating 05:29, 5 February 2012 (UTC) keep nbsp; As per #1, nomination is not an argument for deletion.  AfD should be closed within 24 hours so that nominator can decide whether or not to do the work needed to prepare the community for a discussion.  See and .  Deletion of Irina Berezhna WP:SK||WP:NPASR||WP:ATD||WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Speedy keep 86 +5962 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Marine Scouts User:Edison 15:19, 2 July 2008 (UTC) delete In-universe article about subject that fails Deletion of Space Marine Scouts WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5963 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe and Ellen User:Gwalla 22:48, 20 November 2009 (UTC) comment And that is . You may want to read through Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions|Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions to familiarize yourself with the sorts of arguments that are routinely rejected out of hand at Articles for Deletion. If you think that Joe and Ellen qualify for an article under Wikipedia's guidelines (see ), you should address those guidelines and how the subject meets them, and eschew arguments that amount to special pleading. &mdash Deletion of Joe and Ellen WP:ILIKEIT||WP:BAND Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +5964 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cookham Reach Sailing Club User:jamesslong NONE keep """Per . I read other Wiki entries for sailing clubs before creating this page and structured it in the same way, providing the same sort of information. When the article is about a club it is hard not to write an article about the club without including """"advertising"""" information, because that is the nature of the organisation - information about it provides detail about what it does. Reference - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ship_Club. If you believe I need to change the content format, please can you suggest what I change? I will add more external references to the club as suggested""" Deletion of Cookham Reach Sailing Club WP:NOTADVERTISING Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5965 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Civmec (2nd nomination) User:HighKing 19:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC) comment Press Releases and company announcements do not meet the criteria for establishing notability as per Deletion of Civmec (2nd nomination) WP:ORGIND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5966 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Bluestone User:MacGyverMagic 09:02, 3 December 2008 (UTC) merge to List of Gargoyles characters and '''merge''' heavily condensed plot details as per . Also the name itself makes for a reasonable redirect. There might be little real-world content, but the lead and the first section can be given a home (at least the very first sentence is referenced). A lack of real-world value only shows the subject is fictional and might not be worth a separate article. It says nothing about not covering it at all Deletion of Matt Bluestone WP:FICT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5967 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Famous born again christians User:Shalom 21:16, 28 June 2007 (UTC) delete """I'm not even certain that """"born-again Christians"""" would be a good category. Certainly it doesn't work as a """ Deletion of Famous born again christians WP:LIST Wikipedia:Lists 36 +5968 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/England 2030 FIFA World Cup bid User:SportingFlyer 17:58, 20 September 2018 (UTC) keep through the sourcing, passes . Per , ''It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced.'' That is the case here Deletion of England 2030 FIFA World Cup bid WP:GNG||WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5969 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronology of Shakespeare's plays – Oxfordian (2nd nomination) User:Smatprt 20:59, 9 November 2011 (UTC) comment There is disagreement over the Chronology of Shakespeare's plays, and there is disagreement over the Oxfordian version being discussed here. Both articles present competing viewpoints (although the main Shakespeare chronology disregards most early scholarship on the matter and some notable dissenting viewpoints). In this case, just because there is no wide-spread agreement is no reason to delete the article. Also, there is plenty of information in this article that is NOT repeated in any other article. Comments to the contrary are incorrect on this. The repeated information is there '''''so that NPOV is addressed and readers are clearly aware what the mainstream position is (the repeated bits) and what the minority viewpoint is (the non-repeated bits)'''''. As a ringe topic, views of the adherents are allowed, as long as they are published by independent mainstream publishers etc. That is precisely the case here with Ogburn and Anderson, for example Deletion of Chronology of Shakespeare's plays – Oxfordian (2nd nomination) WP:F Wikipedia:Non-free content 55 +5970 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alone-ishness User:Aeon1006 06:19, 11 July 2006 (UTC) delete Fail Deletion of Alone-ishness WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5971 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Munna Yadav User:Narky 09:41, 30 November 2020 (UTC) keep """Per - """"The following are presumed to be notable: Politicians ... who ... (for countries with federal or similar systems of government) ... have been members of legislative bodies at those levels."""" India is in that class of country, just like e.g. USA""" Deletion of Munna Yadav WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5972 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Socialism in One Country User:AllyD 22:06, 12 November 2011 (UTC) keep A one-word nomination that really needs a prior application of . Try Google Books for a start. Articles in need of improved referencing but on subjects of clear notability do not belong at AfD Deletion of Socialism in One Country :WP:BEFORE Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +5973 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James W. LaBelle User:K 05:06, 7 February 2018 (UTC) keep meets ; an acceptable stub at this point. Does not violate guidelines Deletion of James W. LaBelle WP:PROF Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5974 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tornado supreme User:Wstaffor 23:01, 18 April 2006 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Tornado supreme WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5975 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas McNutt User:Boleyn 15:18, 2 August 2017 (UTC) delete Doesn't meet or . My first idea was a redirect to Collin Street Bakery, which mentions McNutt. However, I think there's a high chance that would misdirect people who are actually looking for Thomas MacNutt. I appreciate the efforts {{u|Flatoncsi}} has gone to in an attempt to rescue this, but although there's a possibility the election itself meets our notability criteria, McNutt himself just does not Deletion of Thomas McNutt WP:NPOL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5976 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy Boyd (Tennessee public figure) User:South 14:55, 5 March 2017 (UTC) delete Fails , . Some bits and pieces can be merged into other articles, but not too much Deletion of Randy Boyd (Tennessee public figure) WP:NPOLITICIAN||WP:NBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5977 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guy (noun slang) User:Icewhiz 15:05, 21 July 2019 (UTC) delete Concur present entry is a , and unclear if it could be developed further Deletion of Guy (noun slang) WP:DICTDEF Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +5978 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controversies related to prevalence of Jews in leadership roles in Hollywood User:Frmatt 18:19, 20 October 2009 (UTC) comment As the nominator of this article, I feel some need to speak up a bit about the reasons why it was nominated. As I said in the original nomination, it appeared to have some significant sourcing issues as the article at that time mainly consisted of excerpts from other WP articles, and had the appearance of making significant claims of anti-semitism without properly sourcing or criticizing them. Of the sources listed, both the Haaertz and the Joel Stein columns appear to be somewhat satirical, and not as factual as other sources might be. Nowhere did I ever list as a reason for this AfD, and I don't believe that it applies here. As for Noleander's second question, I don't know. It should be noted that this AfD stemmed from an Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#user:Noleander_and_antisemitism-related_articles|ANI entry where an accusation of anti-semitism was brought against a user and I brought the conversation over here so that the conversation would focus on the article instead of the user Deletion of Controversies related to prevalence of Jews in leadership roles in Hollywood WP:COATRACK Wikipedia:Coatrack articles 47 +5979 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent National Socialism User:Toon05 16:42, 6 July 2008 (UTC) delete non-notable, non-|verifiable due to no |reliable sources - a forum posting is actually used as a cite. Looks to be promoting this organisation Deletion of Independent National Socialism WP:V||WP:RS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5980 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ScienceWorld (2nd nomination) User:Xxanthippe 22:33, 21 June 2017 (UTC) keep Immensely valuable web resource on science, complementary to Wikipedia. Passes Deletion of ScienceWorld (2nd nomination) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5981 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahul Parmar User:Atlantic306 16:31, 21 April 2018 (UTC) delete apart from the probable coi, he only seems to have a finished film credit as an assistant director so this article is as he needs to be the main director on notable released films Deletion of Rahul Parmar WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +5982 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Lewis (singer-songwriter) User:Bearian 21:10, 16 March 2010 (UTC) delete """or ''userfy''. There is a claim of notability per - """"Has performed in 40 states across the U.S."""" But this statement needs to be |verified""" Deletion of Michael Lewis (singer-songwriter) WP:MUSIC||WP:V Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5983 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Az Zawiyah User:Anotherclown 08:36, 27 February 2011 (UTC) delete """Currently this topic lacks """"signfificant independent coverage"""" under . As such merge the little cited information to a parent article like 2011 Libyan uprising and ditch the rest""" Deletion of Battle of Az Zawiyah WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5984 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Villa Park Little League User:TKE 04:13, 31 May 2006 (UTC) comment This belongs at |Copyright Problems, as the text is lifted from the website Deletion of Villa Park Little League WP:CV Wikipedia:Copyright violations 16 +5985 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Shankland User:Sir 21:45, 14 August 2012 (UTC) delete per nom. Fails and Deletion of Mark Shankland WP:GNG||WP:NSPORT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5986 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bath Fitter User:Tucoxn 23:40, 22 November 2013 (UTC) delete Does not pass Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies):the topic has not been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Also, |wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion Deletion of Bath Fitter WP:PROMOTION Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +5987 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Errol Sawyer (3rd nomination) [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''111''']] 09:42, 9 June 2013 (UTC) delete from my perspective, the article would need a lot more by way of |reliable sources to substantiate the notability of the subject. I've had a look online and couldn't find much that would help the cause. Using Facebook and blogs is a bad start, but a significant amount of the article is sourced to the subject's own self-published book and website. There's a few things ''by'' him, but not a lot ''about'' him. Not enough to meet or in my view Deletion of Errol Sawyer (3rd nomination) WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:ARTIST Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +5988 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ConFuzzled User:Soir 23:14, 21 March 2010 (UTC) keep It has a third-party primary source outside its interest group (http://www.manchesterconfidential.co.uk/News/General/Furries-storm-Manchester_516.asp), several unaffiliated secondary sources within (WikiFur News/Flayrah, as per GreenReaper; also Furtean Times http://furteantimes.com/ft/6/), and some natural if any is needed http://www.confuzzled.org.uk/. Hardly a mainstream press selection, but certainly enough for an article in the area of furry conventions outside the US. Compare with RBW UK. As far as |general notability () is concerned, secondary sources are enough; even preferred. Additionally, |verifiability is article content policy, rather than a single basis for deletion. Improvement would be nice, though - but then |no Wikipedia article is a final draft Deletion of ConFuzzled WP:SELFPUB||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:V||WP:IMPERFECT Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +5989 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RAS syndrome (2nd nomination) User:LinguistAtLarge 17:53, 23 June 2009 (UTC) keep """We should improve sourcing and expand notable subjects, not delete them. For proof of |notability, see Uncle G's comments above. If the article's title """"RAS Syndrome"""" is not the most widespread term used to describe this phenomenon, then that should be discussed on the talk page, and the article moved, not deleted. — """ Deletion of RAS syndrome (2nd nomination) WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5990 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spencer Carbery [[User talk:204.126.132.231|talk]]) 18:32, 30 July 2014 (UTC) delete """Fails . Coverage is routine sports coverage from the local paper--""""Coach, how do things look for the new season?"""".Special:Contributions/204.126.132.231|204.126.132.231""" Deletion of Spencer Carbery WP:NHOCKEY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5991 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verdo User:Bearian 20:15, 1 April 2020 (UTC) delete per , , , , and Deletion of Verdo WP:GNG||WP:MILL||WP:SIGCOV||WP:SPAM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5992 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xindi (Star Trek) (2nd nomination) User:Dennisthe2 07:18, 24 December 2019 (UTC) keep I'm a bit on the fence here, but the Xindi had a fair presence in Enterprise. At the risk of invoking , there is precedent for including the races of the Trek universe (see Klingon, for instance) - but I know that this alone is not justification. Seems well cited, at the worst Deletion of Xindi (Star Trek) (2nd nomination) WP:WAX Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +5993 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yu-Gi-Oh!: The Abridged Series User:Kunzite 01:12, 18 October 2006 (UTC) delete as mentioned before it doesn't pass . The target is a copyvio too. I think we have a policy against generally not linking to those in Deletion of Yu-Gi-Oh!: The Abridged Series WP:WEB||WP:EL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5994 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eagles Nest Cafeteria User:Northamerica1000 05:26, 18 March 2015 (UTC) delete Fails per a lack of significant coverage in reliable sources Deletion of Eagles Nest Cafeteria WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5995 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Versistasis User:Ihcoyc 15:52, 20 April 2012 (UTC) delete WP:OR|original research and |meaningless: ''....the novel expounds a theory of everything, deposing the objectivity/subjectivity typical in traditional logical equations of reality, by a post-modern rhetoric. Versistasis defines the forces typical in creation as being fractal concurrent powers, such as those typical of the planetary bodies in a astrological interpretation and of the human qualities inherent to them and the material universe.'' Wow! Postmodern rhetoric can do all that Deletion of Versistasis WP:NONSENSE Wikipedia:Patent nonsense 77 +5996 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of second generation National Football League players User:Shoessss 15:06, 7 May 2009 (UTC) keep First, I would not use the word “Arbitrary”, in that a requirement for the list is that their father played. That makes the list just the opposite. Second, in that the players listed on the page will have qualified for inclusion here at Wikipedia under |athlete their inclusion on this page does not contradicted any policies or procedures. Finally, I believe the list could be both informative and helpful. Thanks Deletion of List of second generation National Football League players WP:ATH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5997 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic and Other Misdemeanors User:Karanacs 19:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC) delete Fails and OT#PLOT. Links Hobit notes above don't appear to meet the notability criteria for books Deletion of Magic and Other Misdemeanors WP:N||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5998 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multiple oscillation mechanism User:Mark 03:16, 30 September 2013 (UTC) delete I was unable to find any reliable sources for this topic in Google news, books, or scholar. The animation comes from http://www.anandmi.com/NEW_INVENTION_1.html this page, which indicated that the mechanism is the subject of a patent, but patents are not considered reliable sources. Thus the topic seems to fail general notability guidelines, per . The author of the article also looks like the inventor, raising conflict of interest problems, per , and rendering this article promotional in nature. A non-notable topic and serious article problems suggest deletion Deletion of Multiple oscillation mechanism WP:GNG||WP:COI Wikipedia:Notability 71 +5999 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relentless (novel) User:Triwbe 19:35, 8 August 2009 (UTC) keep now has just enough overage in Deletion of Relentless (novel) WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +6000 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/November 9th, 2010 Southern California Missile Launch User:Anotherclown 20:20, 11 November 2010 (UTC) delete fails and is unlikley to be notable in the future (given the now obvious outcome of the investigation Deletion of November 9th, 2010 Southern California Missile Launch WP:NOTNEWS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +6001 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ardashir Vakil User:Whpq 16:12, 28 February 2011 (UTC) keep He has been profiled in the http://thestar.com.my/lifestyle/story.asp?file=/2010/2/26/lifebookshelf/5549884&sec=lifebookshelf Malaysia Star, and interviewed by http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=49645 Express India which represent coverage about the subject meeting he |general notability criteria. Aside from that, his works have received critical reviews in multiple reliable sources such as http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/reviews/one-day-by-ardashir-vakil-596952.html The Independent, http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/32706473.html?dids=32706473:32706473&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Aug+09%2C+1998&author=PAULA+FRIEDMAN&pub=Los+Angeles+Times&desc=Only+the+Lonely%3B+BEACH+BOY.+By+Ardashir+Vakil+%28Scribner%3A+240+pp.%2C+%2422%29&pqatl=google LA Times, http://www.newstatesman.com/200302030042 New Statesman, http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/34592889.html?dids=34592889:34592889&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Sep+27%2C+1998&author=Sudip+Bose&pub=The+Washington+Post&desc=Bombay+Spice&pqatl=google Washington Post meeting |notoability for authors being multiple reviews from reliable sources Deletion of Ardashir Vakil WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6002 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lost, Scotland User:Elomis 20:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC) delete per nom. does make the unfortunate and regretable concession that somehow every backwater non-notable town which may be folded up tomorrow can have it's article. I'm going to cite |Wikipedia: ignore all rules and suggest deletion. This rule about in that every hole on the planet can have an article is a bad thing, and for the benefit of Wikipedia should be ignored Deletion of Lost, Scotland WP:NOTABILITY||WP:IGNORE||WP:NOTABILITY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6003 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CBPN-FM User:Bearcat 17:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC) delete all per nominator. No automatic presumption of notability per , and no viable |reliable sourcing to verify on an ongoing basis whether the stations are actually still operational or not — even when this class of station ''did'' have to have a conventional CRTC license there was rarely if ever any real sourcing possible ''beyond'' the license documents themselves, so when that class of sourcing disappears too there's simply nothing left Deletion of CBPN-FM WP:NMEDIA||WP:RS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6004 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Hussey User:Carioca 21:16, 17 October 2009 (UTC) delete Non-notable player, fails and Deletion of Chris Hussey WP:ATHLETE||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6005 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Not The Tommy Boyd Show User:Joe 18:02, 1 May 2010 (UTC) delete I can't find significant coverage for this |podcast Deletion of Not The Tommy Boyd Show WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6006 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Whedon User:Shooterwalker 16:16, 17 July 2010 (UTC) merge to Brothers & Sisters (2006 TV series)#Extended family and friends. That's a good place to grow the list until it's suitable for spinout. In the meantime, can't |verify notability Deletion of Joe Whedon WP:V Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +6007 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PRstore User:AllyD 08:54, 12 July 2015 (UTC) delete As per the nominator, I am seeing nothing beyond routine announcements in the period to 2009 and then the given references to the legal action, but nothing that would meet Deletion of PRstore :WP:CORPDEPTH Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6008 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Craft (politician) User:Muboshgu 23:04, 4 November 2013 (UTC) delete fails and . –  Deletion of Thomas Craft (politician) WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6009 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nijananda sampradaya User:Vcessayist 00:19, 7 October 2012 (UTC) delete due to a lack of third party sources. Cannot meet the Deletion of Nijananda sampradaya WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6010 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinay Deolalikar User:GorillaWarfare 17:36, 9 August 2010 (UTC) delete Goodness, third edit conflict I've run into. Anyway, not |notable enough to meet requirements. Maybe once the proof is substantiated? Additionally, I'd like to point out a few things in response to Aksi's argument. Do you have sources proving notability? Regarding your second point (about the blog posts and tweets) please read . Regarding your third point, please see . Sorry to throw policies at you like this, but the arguments you make above are not strong enough to hold up. The first might be, if you had sources to back it up Deletion of Vinay Deolalikar WP:N||WP:UNRS||WP:POPULARPAGE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6011 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christof May User:Haminoon 08:08, 11 May 2015 (UTC) keep Meets several criteria in . Some of his clarinet playing with Abbuehl is stunning Deletion of Christof May WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6012 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IndUS Aviation NONE NONE comment Does anyone yet have a single showing that IndUS aviation have built and shipped a single aircraft Deletion of IndUS Aviation WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +6013 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plastic Raygun User:Aguerriero 19:56, 10 July 2006 (UTC) keep as I have re-written to establish notability. The criteria for notability of record labels is not really specified in , but I believe releasing a top 20 single and releasing records for other prominent breakbeat artists is notable Deletion of Plastic Raygun WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6014 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunstroke (song) User:PamD 14:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC) keep """Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable."""" from , so it's notable""" Deletion of Sunstroke (song) WP:NSONG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6015 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hollywood Undead (2nd nomination) User:Doktorbuk 07:58, 22 April 2006 (UTC) comment Uh-oh, be careful with that. This particular band are, strictly speaking, non-notable by the rules of . Attempting to stretch the boundaries of those rules for one specific case will only make subsequent debates even harder to undertake. I thought the non-notable band argument had been sorted, but obviously not Deletion of Hollywood Undead (2nd nomination) WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6016 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trans-Siberian March Band User:Atlantic306 01:45, 27 October 2016 (UTC) keep as just passing , managed to fix some of the references including: https://web.archive.org/web/20111109020138/http://ukingeorgia.fco.gov.uk/en/about-us/our-embassy/social/brass-band British Embassy in Georgia, https://web.archive.org/web/20110927065432/http://www.musicomh.com/music/gigs/dj-yoda_0911.htm Music OMH, and https://web.archive.org/web/20120325215539/http://www.theartsdesk.com/new-music/mahala-rai-banda-and-trans-siberian-march-band-rich-mix the arts desk Deletion of Trans-Siberian March Band WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6017 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khawar Qureshi User:ianmacm 07:49, 5 July 2020 (UTC) delete various problems including failing to meet and written like a résumé Deletion of Khawar Qureshi WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6018 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now That's What I Call Music! 36 (U.S. series) User:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars 19:36, 20 October 2010 (UTC) keep Although an extension of the requirements of , since this series is the most notable of all compilation albums, it should follow that individual albums within that series are notable. However, I am not against a redirect of many of the ''Now'' album articles for those that are nothing more than track lists. I'd prefer a redirect over delete here Deletion of Now That's What I Call Music! 36 (U.S. series) WP:NALBUMS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6019 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of surviving veterans of the Spanish Civil War User:The 20:20, 13 August 2018 (UTC) delete """I fail to see |purpose to the list. Moreover, it's bound to remain incomplete and inaccurate: There are many people who took part in that conflict and who are alive today but will never be included because of lack of sources. Plus, there's always the issue of how """"took part"""" is defined, i.e. who qualifies as a veteran? Only soldiers? The nurses? The civil service administrators of either side? A veritable Pandora's box""" Deletion of List of surviving veterans of the Spanish Civil War WP:LISTPURP Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +6020 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/True Assassin User:Quasirandom 17:15, 1 December 2008 (UTC) merge per all versions of , nominator's suggestion, and consensus that this is the best way to handle individually non-notable elements of a notable franchise Deletion of True Assassin WP:FICT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6021 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clinical trials on Ayurvedic drugs User:Bearian 20:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC) delete per , , and . Wikipedia has avoided merely publishing United States government meta-studies, and this article is a prime example of why we all agree Deletion of Clinical trials on Ayurvedic drugs WP:SYNTH||WP:CCC||WP:SNOW Wikipedia:No original research 12 +6022 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinclix GroundWorks User:DMacks 20:23, 5 November 2016 (UTC) delete """As it stands, it's in #A7 grounds...doesn't even make a claim of """"notability"""", neither by nor standards. I'd already speedied it as such, but now it's been recreated by the same editor and I guess here we are. Notability is not sufficiently met by inheritance from its projects or affiliated organizations even if they were notable themselves (and note that even this lesser idea does not seem to be met""" Deletion of Dinclix GroundWorks WP:CSD||WP:CORP||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +6023 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesusry User:IslaySolomon 03:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC) delete per noms http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Jesusry&btnG=Google+Search ghits. |Neologism |dict def. |Wikipedia is not a dictionary Deletion of Jesusry WP:NEO||WP:DICDEF||WP:NOT Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +6024 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rape in the United States of America User:Alan 20:28, 18 November 2009 (UTC) comment """Let us not focus on the """"copy and paste"""". That is now fixed since I have deleted the duplicated material from the rape page. Since WP is always growing it follows that some articles should be |split. Due to the large amount of US info in the article it was a logical move to split it out""" Deletion of Rape in the United States of America WP:SPLIT Wikipedia:Splitting 82 +6025 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HELLZ BELLZ User:Dbtfz 00:40, 9 April 2006 (UTC) delete per nom and Deletion of HELLZ BELLZ WP:CORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6026 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Beatles (terrorist cell) User:Carlossuarez46 19:56, 15 September 2014 (UTC) keep notable, easily passes , esp. since Jihadi John's inclusion Deletion of The Beatles (terrorist cell) WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6027 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flea Market Montgomery User:Mendaliv 09:32, 13 August 2008 (UTC) comment Specifically, I was referring to , ; the content of the article is little more than a biased towards discussing the meme, which I still suggest is of questionable notability. &mdash Deletion of Flea Market Montgomery WP:IINFO||WP:NOTADVOCATE||WP:COATRACK Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +6028 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francys Johnson User:Splash 17:01, 3 September 2005 (UTC) delete Also, there is no assertion of notability here (stating a profession doesn't count), so this is an '''A7 speedy'''. His page at the Uni http://www.arches.uga.edu/~francys/ is blank, so he almost certainly fails the test and would fail the test if we had one Deletion of Francys Johnson WP:PROF||WP:PRIEST Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6029 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of female supervillains (3rd nomination) User:ChrisGualtieri 01:55, 16 August 2014 (UTC) keep As doesn't seem to have been done and limited improvements to improve this over a category hasn't happened yet. I'll do some work, but as a matter of reference, most of these villains already contain numerous links to their criteria and portrayal in media. I'll keep to the easier lists which are ever present to start with. clearly applies and we should aim for a little more than a mere list Deletion of List of female supervillains (3rd nomination) WP:BEFORE||WP:NOTDUP Wikipedia:Articles for deletion 67 +6030 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phousseyne Diaby NONE NONE delete Subject fails . The criteria and subject's scoring on them are presented herebelow Deletion of Phousseyne Diaby WP:NFOOTY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6031 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Reynolds (American musician) User:Richard3120 15:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC) delete fails and . The nominator is correct, the subject is unrelated to John Reynolds (musician), the former husband and musical collaborator of Sinéad O'Connor, whose name comes up more frequently in searches. This John Reynolds doesn't seem to have any notability apart from being the producer of Graham Clarke, but notability is not inherited by association Deletion of John Reynolds (American musician) WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6032 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Devotion Bidwell User:RGTraynor 03:08, 13 August 2008 (UTC) comment """Mmm ... except that explicitly holds that members of a local council are """"likely"""" to be notable if that council is of a """"major metropolitan city."""" A selectman of a town that's never in its history broken 1200 people is leagues below that""" Deletion of John Devotion Bidwell WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6033 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of geniuses (Catharine Cox Miles) User:Coolabahapple 01:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC) comment this list may be of interest to wikireaders (i am surprised that we dont appear to have a general list of geniuses article or even a category covering this, although i acknowledge the difficulties that would arise from such), but without appropriate |references this is a '''delete''', btw, agree with nom that the book ''Genetic Studies of Genius: The Early Mental Traits of Three Hundred Geniuses'' is notable Deletion of List of geniuses (Catharine Cox Miles) WP:RS Wikipedia:Reliable sources 31 +6034 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyer Allen User:Spatulli 11:30, 27 September 2010 (UTC) delete per otability (sports), playing for the US national team is not notable in rugby league Deletion of Tyer Allen WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6035 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SableVM User:1292simon 01:49, 15 December 2012 (UTC) keep Topic is notable, but article desperately needs a rewrite so that non-geeks can understand it and to wind back the Deletion of SableVM WP:PEACOCK Wikipedia:Manual of Style 89 +6036 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/12. Hitoe User:ShadowHalo 05:22, 25 January 2007 (UTC) delete Appears to fail Deletion of 12. Hitoe WP:BAND Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6037 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming (4th nomination) NONE NONE comment the nominator and other editors argue that this list is -- but, if so, so is every other list in the encyclopedia. Making a list involves editorial choices, generally by many editors. See, for example, the http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_science_fiction_authors&action=history Revision history of the List of science fiction authors -- or virtually any other list in the encyclopedia Deletion of List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming (4th nomination) WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +6038 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of anime clichés User:Dark 22:14, 4 November 2006 (UTC) delete It might be possible to make an encyclopedic list of this sort... but at the moment its completely |OR and almost totally useless. &mdash Deletion of List of anime clichés WP:OR Wikipedia:No original research 12 +6039 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Forrester User:Ohconfucius 04:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC) delete WP:COI|autobio of a non-notable apparent self-publicist. Article is based on and completely fails Deletion of Gary Forrester WP:SPS||WP:RS Wikipedia:Verifiability 2 +6040 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georg H.B. Luck User:David 08:44, 24 February 2013 (UTC) keep This is not the sort of field where I would expect Google scholar to be helpful in judging his impact (especially since he did much of his work pre-internet) but his ''Arcana mundi'' is held in nearly 1000 libraries and has nearly 200 citations on Google scholar, his 1997 German-language collection of texts of the cynics has recently been translated into Dutch with a nice review http://www.vn.nl/boeken/literaire-kroniek/waarin-het-cynisme-concurrentie-krijgt-van-het-kynisme/, his ''The Latin love elegy'' was translated into 5 languages, the ''New York Times'' in the late 1990s recalled him as ten years earlier being a leader of a group of anti-postmodern reactionaries, etc. I think he passes both #C1 and Deletion of Georg H.B. Luck WP:PROF||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6041 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Akburç User:Fenix 11:39, 16 August 2016 (UTC) delete Fails |NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a |fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy |GNG Deletion of Ali Akburç WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6042 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guy Stephens Celin User:Opencooper 04:12, 29 March 2016 (UTC) delete I can't find any coverage of the subject to meet the |general notability guidelines nor do they meet considering they only recently released a film and it is a short. The page is also eligible for speedy deletion via Deletion of Guy Stephens Celin WP:GNG||WP:FILMMAKER||WP:A7 Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6043 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donner Pass Derby User:Govvy 15:58, 8 May 2021 (UTC) delete article fails , Deletion of Donner Pass Derby WP:GNG||WP:NSPORT Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6044 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erdős–Bacon–Sabbath number User:Bilorv 00:35, 12 April 2017 (UTC) delete other than the Times Higher Education source, there are no reliable sources on this topic. The article is basically just and |synthesis of Erdos/Bacon/Sabbath numbers. I came across Erdős–Bacon number the other day and thought ''that'' was pushing it (and that article probably does need to be trimmed of a lot of OR), but Erdős–Bacon–Sabbath is definitely too far Deletion of Erdős–Bacon–Sabbath number WP:OR||WP:SYNTH Wikipedia:No original research 12 +6045 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vidyananda User:K 05:43, 24 June 2018 (UTC) delete does not meet ; significant RS coverage not found. Just a page, lacking reliable sources Deletion of Vidyananda WP:ANYBIO||WP:ADVOCACY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6046 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invisible system User:Joe 00:29, 9 June 2010 (UTC) delete I can't find significant coverage for this |band Deletion of Invisible system WP:MUSIC Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6047 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boraq Tower User:Sabiona 15:23, 3 December 2009 (UTC) delete per Deletion of Boraq Tower WP:CRYSTAL Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +6048 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew VanDyke User:Northamerica1000 08:51, 20 November 2011 (UTC) keep No valid argument for deletion exists in the nomination. Topic easily passes . See references section of the article Deletion of Matthew VanDyke WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6049 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013–14 Veria F.C. season User:Fenix 10:55, 22 April 2014 (UTC) keep Article is a record for a club playing in a top professional league as required by , see no reason why sourced prose cannot be added. Agree with Nfitz that the state of the article is nearly identical to that of many others. Needs improving, but no reason whatsoever given current consensus to consider this as a non-notable subject Deletion of 2013–14 Veria F.C. season WP:NSEASONS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6050 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tasha Scott User:Atlantic306 21:10, 18 September 2019 (UTC) keep in view of the evidence above, she does seem to pass with prominent roles on tv and theatre as theatre is included in the criteria, thanks Deletion of Tasha Scott WP:NACTOR Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6051 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Leone User:Dennis 02:51, 4 November 2011 (UTC) delete whose write up in http://www.hawkesbaytoday.co.nz/news/lead-story-mixed-martial-arts-fighting-words-of-wi/1019322/ is way more than a passing mention even if it is local, as well as the general generic listings, *might* be enough to keep (for him, i say '''weak keep'''). The rest, delete seems clear as they have few fights, only stats references and are simply |too new to have attracted much press yet. Maybe next year. And may I recommend grouping these in smaller groups next time, say 5 per AFD. Not everyone is going to want to read and look up so many names in one group, and I'm hoping I didn't miss something due to the sheer volume of work to do so. And how it may attract !votes more from people who won't look them up instead of people who will. Still better than individual AFDs, I agree on that point Deletion of Andrew Leone WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +6052 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shit (band) User:Padenton 20:28, 23 April 2015 (UTC) delete """There's actually a band named """"Shit""""? Seriously? Anyways, no evidence they pass any of the criteria, having a bit of trouble checking for (if someone knows more google fu than I do, please post a decent query we might use). Then there's Ryan Tong (the band's leader) https://www.google.com/search?tbm=nws&q=""""Ryan+Tong"""" which is somewhat better, but still unable to tell if any refer to the same Ryan Tong. Maybe the article's creator can provide us with some help here? I tried Jonah Falco (mentioned as being some sort of collaborator in article) https://www.google.com/search?tbm=nws&q=""""Jonah+Falco""""&oq=""""Jonah+Falco"""" which gives a decent number of results, though, as to whether any of those are reliable sources, or whether any provide significant and independent coverage of Shit, I don't know. ― """ Deletion of Shit (band) WP:NBAND||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6053 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EBabe User:JJL 15:17, 30 December 2007 (UTC) delete as Deletion of EBabe WP:NEO Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 10 +6054 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Game Industry Map User:Disavian 00:47, 11 August 2008 (UTC) delete appears to fail Deletion of Game Industry Map WP:WEB Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6055 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014–15 Chester F.C. season User:Number 14:26, 26 August 2020 (UTC) delete per failure Deletion of 2014–15 Chester F.C. season WP:NSEASONS Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6056 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zach Steinberger User:Sir 19:54, 28 October 2014 (UTC) delete he has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails and Deletion of Zach Steinberger WP:NSPORT||WP:GNG Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6057 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solo family User:Jontesta 16:54, 31 January 2021 (UTC) delete a few of the individual characters have proven |notability with reliable sources. But this is |an original synthesis of those separate notable articles into a new topic that itself isn't notable. It's a and doesn't cover anything unique that isn't already covered at the individual articles. A redirect to Han Solo as the main notable character would be fine Deletion of Solo family WP:N||WP:SYNTH||WP:CONTENTFORK Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6058 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Parker (California politician) User:onel5969 18:44, 24 August 2015 (UTC) delete doesn't meet either or Deletion of Mike Parker (California politician) WP:GNG||WP:NPOL Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6059 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Keever (2nd nomination) User:Bakazaka 00:04, 25 April 2019 (UTC) delete Exactly ten edits, then a promotional article for someone whose article was previously deleted at AfD as the eleventh edit? That's a bingo. Delete under , which is policy Deletion of Jason Keever (2nd nomination) WP:NOTPROMO Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +6060 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Holm User:Nfitz 19:12, 6 July 2014 (UTC) keep Comments from the teams football director are clear that he's been made part of the first team with the expectation of playing http://www.jv.dk/artikel/1761930:Sport--Talenter-faar-chancen-i-Broendby as such it's almost certain he will play and meet . The season starts in 14 days, it's a waste of time and energy to delete an article that would very likely be recreated in a few weeks. There's no rush to delete this article before then. There are no firm rules that say this article needs to be deleted before we see happens, and there is . This article remaining in place for a few weeks does no harm, so let's show a bit of ; if something bizarre happens over the summer, the article can simply go to AFD at that time Deletion of Daniel Holm WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:NORUSH||WP:COMMONSENSE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6061 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathryn Smith User:Peterkingiron 12:17, 26 January 2011 (UTC) delete see - Councillor = NN; failed Parliamentary candidate - NN; drunk driver = NN; Nothing notable Deletion of Kathryn Smith WP:POLITICIAN Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6062 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hazard High School User:Lifebaka 03:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC) delete Lacks claims to |noability or sources to back up such claims. I'd like to see the article given a little time, though, as it was just created today. A PROD might've been more appropriate Deletion of Hazard High School WP:N Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6063 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Partner 2 (2011 film) User:Eddie 19:54, 22 July 2010 (UTC) delete violates and Deletion of Partner 2 (2011 film) WP:CRYSTAL||WP:RS Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 69 +6064 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wayne'M User:The 23:04, 21 January 2010 (UTC) delete as a non-notable musician; article will need to be rewritten even if kept due to a significant |neutral point of view violation. &mdash Deletion of Wayne'M WP:NPOV Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 42 +6065 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Handley User:Eggishorn 05:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC) delete Qualifies for and nothing is gained by preserving Deletion of Craig Handley WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons 15 +6066 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avail Health User:Mendaliv 03:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC) delete as #A7|non-notable corporation with no assertion of notability. Srsly Deletion of Avail Health WP:CSD Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion 76 +6067 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Mulcahy User:TCN7JM 01:56, 28 September 2013 (UTC) delete Yeah, it doesn't look like he's played in a league that would make him famous per Deletion of Stephen Mulcahy WP:NFOOTY Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6068 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agility Association of Canada User:Justlettersandnumbers 11:16, 30 December 2020 (UTC) delete no independent sources in the page, no sign of any in-depth coverage via Gbooks, Scholar or JSTOR, does not begin to satisfy Deletion of Agility Association of Canada WP:NCORP Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6069 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superhero Hype! (2nd nomination) User:Carrite 14:47, 18 August 2011 (UTC) comment """I took a glance at the nearly information-free, unsourced stub of a piece and I thought this was an easy call for deletion. Then I ran a simple Google search for the exact phrase """"Superhero hype"""" and came up with 1.65 million hits and that made my head swim a little. How can there be so much out there relating to a site that ends up in an article this bad? It's a bit of a mystery... Does the lack of a swarm of comic book nerds here making an impassioned defense mean that the comic book nerds have given up on Wikipedia? And if so, what does that mean? Is it worth sifting through 1,649,854 blog posts to find a few kernels of substantial independent content that will save this wretched stub? It's all very puzzling. Ironically, and it will probably drive Mr. Hammer nuts for me to say this, the simple argument seems to me to be a reasonable one. Then again, that doesn't cut the mustard with most AfD closers, who want to see (a) content worth saving and/or (b) independent sourcing. This piece has neither. And I'm done blathering without an opinion either way""" Deletion of Superhero Hype! (2nd nomination) WP:ITSNOTABLE Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 20 +6070 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antisemitism in the Labour Party User:The 04:00, 10 December 2017 (UTC) keep Per : https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/sep/27/labour-denial-antisemitism-party-dark-place ''Guardian'' http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/25/jeremy-corbyn-accused-having-ostrich-strategy-anti-semitism/ ''Telegraph''https://www.channel4.com/news/factcheck/factcheck-labour-and-antisemitism Channel 4 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5048787/Scale-anti-semitism-Labour-party-revealed.html ''Daily Mail'' http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/247057/british-labour-corbyn-anti-semitism ''Tablet'' http://www.thetower.org/article/britains-labour-party-tries-to-whitewash-its-anti-semitism/ ''The Tower'' http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-41394265 ''BBC'' https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/anti-semitism-claims-hound-u-k-s-labour-party-despite-n781621 NBC https://www.ft.com/content/935cb198-a2d5-11e7-b797-b61809486fe2 ''Financial Times'' https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/top-writers-accuse-jeremy-corbyn-s-labour-party-of-antisemitism-2k9r9qnd6 ''The Times'' http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4923670/RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-anti-Semitism-Labour-Party.html ''Daily Mail'' https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/top-writers-accuse-jeremy-corbyn-s-labour-party-of-antisemitism-2k9r9qnd6 ''The Times'' https://news.sky.com/story/labour-could-face-brighton-conference-ban-over-anti-semitism-claims-11054721 Sky News http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/labour-activists-applaud-speaker-calling-11235449 ''The Mirror'' https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/baroness-chakrabarti-slams-labour-members-who-say-no-antisemitism-in-party-1.445232 ''The Jewish Chronicle'' https://www.timesofisrael.com/with-partys-lingering-anti-semitism-who-are-the-jews-running-on-britains-labour-ticket/ ''The Times of Israel'' https://www.haaretz.com/world-news/europe/1.821347 ''Haaretz'' http://www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/maajid-nawaz/labour-institutionally-anti-semitic-maajid-nawaz/ LBC http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/british-jews-believe-labour-too-tolerant-of-anti-semitism_uk_599986fce4b0a2608a6ccd6f ''Huffington post Deletion of Antisemitism in the Labour Party WP:NOTE Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6071 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notable figures of the 1980s User:The 23:05, 1 March 2008 (UTC) delete per . This is an exceedingly broad list and seems to be rather pointless Deletion of Notable figures of the 1980s WP:LIST Wikipedia:Lists 36 +6072 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judith Blegen & Frederica von Stade: Songs, Arias & Duets User:Niggle1892 12:30, 22 September 2019 (UTC) keep per The article's COPYVIO issue has now been addressed - brief quotes from reviews will be added in due course. See ''Opera'', July 2011, p. 670 for further discussion Deletion of Judith Blegen & Frederica von Stade: Songs, Arias & Duets WP:NALBUM Wikipedia:Notability 71 +6073 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Allington User:Inter 02:29, 16 June 2018 (UTC) delete as per above fails the notability requirements, at the age of 18 this is obviously and article can always be recreated if and when subject meets said notability guidelines Deletion of Sam Allington WP:TOOSOON Wikipedia:Too soon 1 +6074 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Financier User:Bearian 13:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC) keep per due to good work by {{U|BD2412 Deletion of Financier WP:HEY Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard 85 +6075 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InDplay NONE NONE delete as David