Deletion of Unhexseptium

Comment: Contrary to many !keep votes, this element is most definitely '''not''' covered by the exception in noted in , as it has '''not''' been documented by IUPAC. This is more analogous to the hurricane example cited in item of CRYSTAL: "Individual items from a predetermined list or a systematic pattern of names, pre-assigned to future events or discoveries, are not suitable article topics, if only generic information is known about the item. Lists of tropical cyclone names is encyclopedic; "Tropical Storm Alberto (2012)" is not, even though it is virtually certain that a storm of that name will occur in the North Atlantic and will turn counterclockwise." We know what this element will likely be provisionally named ''if it's ever observed'', but so far it hasn't been observed, and, as there are only 8 googlehits for the termhttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Unhexseptium&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq= it seems no one is even doing theoretical on "unhexseptium." (This would also suggest this article is mostly |original research). List of hypothesized transuranic elements might be encyclopedic, but individual articles such as this one are not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:OR)