Deletion of ConFuzzled

Comment: It has a third-party primary source outside its interest group (http://www.manchesterconfidential.co.uk/News/General/Furries-storm-Manchester_516.asp), several unaffiliated secondary sources within (WikiFur News/Flayrah, as per GreenReaper; also Furtean Times http://furteantimes.com/ft/6/), and some natural  if any is needed http://www.confuzzled.org.uk/. Hardly a mainstream press selection, but certainly enough for an article in the area of furry conventions outside the US. Compare with RBW UK. As far as |general notability () is concerned, secondary sources are enough; even preferred. Additionally, |verifiability is article content policy, rather than a single basis for deletion. Improvement would be nice, though - but then |no Wikipedia article is a final draft
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SELFPUB||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:V||WP:IMPERFECT)