Deletion of Rosalie Cadron-Jetté

Comment: as nominator. Per , I searched on Bing and the topic came up with a little more than 100 hits. (http://www.bing.com/search?q=%22Rosalie+Cadron-Jetté%22&go=&form=QBLH&qs=n&sk=). Therefore, I assumed the topic was not that noteworthy. But in reality, I nominated the article for AfD because the article has absolutely not one reference to source the prose nor to prove notability. After further research, she has a certain popularity, but I still believe she isn't notable enough for an article (however, her organization might be notable enough). However, because of the few links on the internet, I doubt reliable sources would be easy to obtain
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Search engine test (WP:SET)

Comment: I did not nominate the article for deletion because it was uncategorized or because it didn't belong to any project. I nominated it because it failed  and . The comments above about not being in a category or project are because of Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#A7. (I assumed the lack of category was because of non-importance). Also, I nominated the article for deletion before any sources were provided. However, viewing the sources, I see that there are very few of them and they peak very little about the subject and most of them pretty much supply the same information. Can anyone supply a reference that proves substantial notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RL)