Deletion of Benjamin Smith

Comment: Being deputy leader of a political party is ''not'' an automatic  pass in its own right — it can be enough ''if'' they can be sourced over  for it, but it is not a freebie that ''exempts'' a person from having to be |reliably sourced. And being the ''youngest'' holder of an otherwise non-notable political role isn't an inclusion freebie either — Wikipedia's notability criteria are based solely on what the achievement ''is'', and accord ''no'' special weight to the ''age'' at which somebody achieved it. But of the five footnotes here, three are |primary sources, one is a university ''student'' newspaper (a class of sourcing that can be used for supplementary sourcing of stray facts ''after'' GNG has already been covered off, but does not count ''toward'' GNG in and of itself), and the only one that's an acceptable |reliable source is a purely |routine list of ''all'' the candidates in a by-election he ran in. So no, the article does ''not'' have enough sources to be on Wikipedia. No prejudice against recreation in the future ''if'' somebody can source it ''better'' than this, but ''none'' of the sources here are good enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS||WP:ROUTINE)