Deletion of Henry Makow

Comment: I agree with the nom that the references listed in the article do not pass . However, there is some reasonably significant newscoverage by reliable sources. GoogleNews gives 46 hitshttp://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&lr=&tab=pn&q=%22Henry+Makow%22&ie=UTF-8, a decent number of which pass . E.g. New York Daily Newshttp://www.nydailynews.com/archives/lifestyle/2005/03/31/2005-03-31_mail_order_matchmaking___new.html, Washington Posthttp://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-1317828.html,  CBC CanadaNewshttp://www.cbc.ca/news/story/2000/05/15/women.html, as well as these ones http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-24761571_ITMhttp://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2000/may/00053002.htmlhttp://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-30538339.html and others. There is also a reasonable amount of coverage in this GoogleNews search of his childhood "AskHenry" column, although I don't know how much that counts now. GoogleBooks gives 45 hits http://books.google.com/books?um=1&lr=&q=%22Henry%20Makow%22&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=np (I am not sure how many are actually related to him). GoogleScholar produces 26 hits totalhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?um=1&lr=&q=%22Henry%20Makow%22&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ps, a few of which appear relevant, such as thishttp://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/497347. Granted, this is not much, but for a conspiracy theorist it is not that bad. |Reliable sources usually avoid them. So I think one could stretch  here a bit
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:BIO)