Deletion of William Coates (longevity claimant) (2nd nomination)

Comment: He has enough quality references to meet at least a technical pass of  (I added two more from the Washington Post, and a lesser mention from the Wall Street Journal).  There are also several books that mention the hoax (which I think it was). A hoax that lasted many years (the Washington Post first did an article in 1999 with follow-ups in 2002, and 2004), cannot really be an "event".  I think the case would be interesting to a reader wanting to know the facts of what actually happened here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This article fails , , and . The experts say he was a fraud and there was very little reporting on him or anything to say about him in a wiki article except brief information on record possibilities if his already disproven age claim was true and how his claim was debunked
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:NOPAGE||WP:SUSTAINED)