Deletion of Richard T. Snodgrass

Comment: This is a slam dunk. The enormous citation base to his work is sufficient (GS h-index seems to be around 25): it is independent, verifiable, as well as being conclusive proof of impact. This indeed is the long-established standard test of  #1, which the subject conspicuously satisfies. ACM Fellow would also be a pass (as would "Fellow"-level election in any of the main scientific societies). Respectfully
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)