Deletion of Robert Blair, Minister

Comment: and move per DeLarge.  Being a part of the team that translated the Bible into Scottish Gaelic strikes me as a significant enough achievement, and per  translating the Bible into a small minority language is no less significant than translating it into English or French.  '''Weak delete''' on the other two unless a further case for their notability is made out
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)

Comment: as I have checked  The only criteria that might possibly apply is the one forbidding formless collections of information. These all relate to the the sometimes tempestuous history of a significant parish in Scotland (meaning the people and events are well in the mainstream of Scottish history and not replicated elsewhere). In that, they give exemplary life to broader treatments elsewhere. John Robertson and James Meek wrote siginificant historical documents - still consulted today. Others to be added have had similar significant impact on the history of Scotland in turbulent times. The others you mention (Blair, Houston, Calderwood) are I admit there to fill in the historical record, but this is not formless or meaningless. I have not yet tracked down the criteria for "notability" and will have to take your advice on this, but I would have thought that the sharing of this sort of well established historical knowledge is just what Wikipedia does best. I appreciate not everyone is interested in history, especially local history, but loads are. It's not all pub quiz material! —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)