Deletion of Vinay Deolalikar

Comment: He seems trivially notable under . There are multiple traditional news articles, as has been pointed out, and even if the proof is flawed it is generally acknowledged that much of the work in it is good and will contribute to other results in the field. (For one example of this see issue #4 https://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2010/08/09/issues-in-the-proof-that-p%E2%89%A0np/ here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Goodness, third edit conflict I've run into. Anyway, not |notable enough to meet requirements. Maybe once the proof is substantiated? Additionally, I'd like to point out a few things in response to Aksi's argument. Do you have sources proving notability? Regarding your second point (about the blog posts and tweets) please read . Regarding your third point, please see . Sorry to throw policies at you like this, but the arguments you make above are not strong enough to hold up. The first might be, if you had sources to back it up
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:UNRS||WP:POPULARPAGE)

Comment: While I agree that this article is currently highly dubious for  notability, mainstream press articles are beginning to appear. For example, a http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19287-p--np-its-bad-news-for-the-power-of-computing.html New Scientist story was published today. I would be surprised if there was not enough coverage within the next couple of days to gain notability. Yes, this is a crystal ball argument, but is there really any harm waiting a few days
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Not |notable, 15 minutes of fame does not merit his inclusion on Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: as a clear case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)