Deletion of Adaptive Compliant Trailing Edge (2nd nomination)

Comment: The ''Times of India'' bio is admittedly not great. The Fox News article that the nominator dismissed out of hand needed no such dismissal (regardless of one's political alignment, Fox News is generally a reliable source). The NASA press release is arguably not independent, and the university pages most certainly are not. Were that all there was to go on, I'd be more inclined to side with deletion. But they are not. There's discussion of the topic by ''Scientific American'' http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/elastic-design-the-fluid-future-of-shape-shifting-technology-video/ here and in one of their senior editor's s http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/2014/12/12/first-flexible-airplane-wing-takes-flight/ here, http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles/2014-11-20/flexsyss-wing-flaps-promise-to-save-fuel Bloomberg Business (which even drew an illustration with a hilariously out-of-context ''Twilight Zone'' tribute), and ''http://www.popsci.com/article/technology/shape-shifting-wing-design-prepares-testing Popular Science''. There's room for editorial quibbling, I'm certain, about ''where'' we should have this information (at the current title, under the company name, under the company's product name, or in BLP format titled after the inventor responsible), but none of that is an issue for AFD to consider
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:NEWSBLOG)