Deletion of Diversity (Black Lives Matter Guiding Principle)

Comment: The Black Lives Matter article has a simple list of the principles and could be augmented with reliably-sourced text on their meaning.  With sufficient sources, it could become necessary to create a more specific article such as Guiding principles of the Black Lives Matter movement which could explore different perspectives from inside and outside the movement in line with usual considerations for due weight, reliability of sources, NPOV, etc, and to have a simple summary in the parent article.  Unfortunately, the essays here are not the basis for such an article as the task set was inherently non-neutral.  I feel sad for the student editors {{u|Burgesspfc}} and {{u|AngelicBeaver}} because they are stuck trying to explore meaning of principles from the movement's perspective (the task set) and when policy requires neutral coverage of perspectives in accord with their weight in sources.  Some of the sources used would be useful for an article but the content is not.  Essays for tertiary education often require synthesis of information, advocacy / arguing for a perspective, and original ideas and thought, and all of these are inconsistent with encyclopaedic writing.  These essays are not the basis for acceptable articles, a |blank page would be an easier starting point.  If the students want to persist, there is a notable topic here and there are editors who would help, but given this is an assignment and the semester is nearly over, I will not be surprised if this does not occur.  It is a shame when instructor-set work on Wikipedia is incompatible with Wikipedia policy, as seems to be the case here, and the Education Program is already planning to look at this case and the Environmental Justice case over summer &ndash; so hopefully we will not see cases like this arise again
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)