Deletion of Laura Coryton

Comment: to tampon tax#United Kingdom. Many of the above responses do not appear to reflect on the content of the sources or make policy-backed arguments. I merged the refs I could and ended up writing the separate tampon tax article while responding to this. Coryton is an activist in a larger campaign—the sources cover her as such and thus so should we. I read through the sources and, as usual, the tell is to find the central idea of each source: (primarily) the tampon tax in the UK, (secondarily) activism against the tax, and (tertiarily) Coryton's personal activism. So the vast majority of the news pertaining to Coryton is really about the tax, of which she is a part. We have no biographical sources from Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable sources|reliable, secondary sourcing—her background, her life, her other activism—it's all in the context of this one element. We handle these situations with Wikipedia:Summary style|summary style: cover the topic in an existing article and if the section grows to become |undue weight and the sources warrant more expansion, split it out into its own article. I'd additionally argue that a whole lot of context is lost by discussing her campaign without any of the background on what the tampon tax activism was like in the UK outside of her petition and participation. Tampon#tax (and Peterkingiron above) make it sound as if this is all her campaign, and some sources do too, but the vast majority of the sourcing credits her mainly for the popular, online petition and "stop taxing periods, period" campaign. I looked and have yet to find any more depth of her campaigning. Until there is sufficient source content for a full treatment of the topic, Coryton is best covered in context at tampon tax#United Kingdom.File:Eye close font awesome.svg|14px|link=user:czar/watching|I am no longer watching this pageping if you'd like a response&nbsp
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)