Deletion of Political game theory

Comment: As mentioned in my comment above, there exist in depth reliable references that discuss the topic of political game theory, so the topic looks notable. The article is poor, the barest stub, but sources are there to develop the article; it has  problems. Reading some of the book I referenced, it is clear to me that political game theory is more that just a textbook application of game theory to political science; there are particular issues with application that have in part caused this to develop into an interdisciplinary field. In the same way the Physical chemistry is more the Chemistry#physics this topic, albeit much newer and less developed, is more than  Game_theory#Political_science. In the interest of consensus, I would not be opposed to a '''merge''', but the source materials for a standalone article are there
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:SURMOUNTABLE)