Deletion of Warp Pipe (software developer) (2nd nomination)

Comment: Sources consist of two interviews, featuring a lot of hand-waving and techno-gibberish about something which apparently never went anywhere.. the crux of  is that sources independent of the subject need to do the reporting in detail. The interviewers are not in a position to analyze the software, instead relying on sketchy details from the developer, that's no basis for an article. No prejudice against restoration if something should come of it in the future and it receives the necessary analysis, but there's currently a whole load of nothing to build an article with
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)