Deletion of Srbosjek (knife) (2nd nomination)

Comment: I have attempted to wade through the present AfD and the two previous ones. I am rather put off by the debate (POV pushing from delete proponents, socking from the keep proponents and a heavy dose of  stuff). At the end of the day, my impression is that there are sufficient sources for the fairly wide use of the term Srbosjek. The English langiage sources mentioned in my comments above are OK and the pre-1990s yugoslavian sources mentioned by Terse appear to be OK (at least I am not willing to discount these sources without a lot more evidence of their unsuitability). Some of the content problems mentioned by the delete proponents can be rectified within the article itself (e.g. one can mention that some of the claims in the article are disputed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:BATTLE)