Deletion of Billy Rosewood

Comment: as it does not matter that it is a character from a notable film as long as the article subject receives coverage in relable sources that meets .... and "Billy Rosewood" seems to get the coverage. The character was specifically covered and in depth by http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,964514,00.html Time Magazine in 1987, and again by http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101870601-146766,00.html Time Magazine in 2001.  And there is significant coverage of the character in relation to the actor: http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,302383_2,00.html Entertainment Weekly, http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=CSTB&p_theme=cstb&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB36DBF223D9D03&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM. Chicago Sun-Times... and http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Billy+Rosewood%22&btnG=Search&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&scoring=a many others.  This is a case where there is enough to support an article about the character, per the precedents set by Hawkeye Pierce, Hot Lips Houlihan, Archie Bunker, Al Bundy, et al
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)