Deletion of Thomas Teo

Comment: Not working in psychology myself, I'm not the best positioned to judge, but I suspect that Teo's corner of academia is a comparatively low-cited field, so his https://scholar.google.ca/citations?user=vNKpI-EAAAAJ&hl=en/ GS h-index of 18 might count substantially towards passing #C1. In addition, he https://www.theoreticalpsychology.org/journal edited the ''Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology'' (and remains a https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/teo/index.aspx?tab=2 consulting editor). Scopus ranks this journal in the https://www.scopus.com/sourceid/19500157012?origin=sbrowse#tabs=1 86th percentile of philosophy journals, citation-wise, so his editorship might count towards passing #C8. If kept, the article would definitely need de-promotionalization, but that's routine for academic biographies, and sources affiliated with the subject are considered acceptable for uncontroversial claims (e.g., where they attended school
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)