Deletion of Dan Humphrey

Comment: as per above and because the nom has failed to comply with  and dismisses without examination the significant body of academic criticism that even a cursory GScholar search turns up. "'Teens Win': Purveying Fantasies of Effortless Economic Mobility and Social Attainment on Rich Teen Soaps" is hardly my idea of entertaining reading, for example, but lack of interest in the content of available sources doesn't justify ignoring their existence
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)