Deletion of List of fictional books within the Discworld series

Comment: With no |verifiability due to the lack of references, the content is |original research by synthesis at best. The content itself consists of a |plot-only description of a fictional work with no reception, significance or even real-world context. Because of this, the list does not meet the criteria of |appropriate topics for lists. Besides this, there are no reliable secondary sources that cover these fictional books to presume that they meet the |general notability guideline or that the list topic has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources to presume that it's appropriate per the criteria of |notability for stand-alone lists. This article is an |unnecessary split of ''Discworld'' and an unneeded |content fork. Also, the list falls into what WP:!|what Wikipedia is not by being |an indiscriminate collection of information, so I believe that it has no place in Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:SYN||WP:PLOT||WP:SALAT||WP:GNG||WP:LISTN||WP:AVOIDSPLIT||WP:CFORK||WP:IINFO)

Comment: merge, or transwiki and redirect.  Afdcruft.  With common sense|verifiability due to the easily available references of the book series itself, the content is unoriginal research at best. The content itself could be improved with reception.  Thus, the list meets the criteria of |appropriate topics for lists.  Besides this, there are likely reliable secondary sources that cover these fictional books that figure into a major well-known series to presume that they meet the |general notability guideline or that the list topic has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources to presume that it is appropriate per the criteria of |notability for stand-alone lists. This article is a necessary split of ''Discworld'' and a needed |content fork for those interested in this notable series.  Also, the list falls into what Wikipedia is by being a discriminate collection of information, so I, the article's authors, and those who come here looking for this information believe that it has a place in Wikipedia.  — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/63.3.19.130|63.3.19.130
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:SALAT||WP:GNG||WP:LISTN||WP:CFORK)