Deletion of I am the Lord your God

Comment: to ten commandments.  I agree with WikiDan61 that the article is well-structured, well-referenced, and well-balanced, and I believe  requires us to consider where to put well-sourced content when deciding a subject is not suitable for a separate article.However, I also agree with Elen of the Roads and OwenX that this is a fork.  I do not agree that it is |original research; it may be a |synthesis, but it does not advance a particular position.All the above would indicate a "keep" outcome, but I think it better to have a smaller number of articles, each of which is longer and watched by more interested editors, than a plethora of small articles each watched by only a few.  I think the Wiki model works best when more editors are involved, and I also think it helps end-users of the encyclopaedia if thematically-grouped content is kept together in the same article so they do not have to search or follow links to find the information they need.  And further, I think much of the content of this article is duplicated in ten commandments so a merge would be more economical in terms of reading time for end-users
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:OR||WP:SYN)