Deletion of Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone

Comment: I contest the claim that this has received widespread coverage. A cursory google brings up coverage, but not by any sites that I would consider mainstream (CNN, New York Times, etc.) except maybe Fox News. If it gets more coverage in the next week or so then we can reinstate this article, but the fact that we don't know for sure yet whether this will be remembered in a year makes this a clear case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: In my opinion, the original rationale for deletion given by the user who proposed AFD is correct—this is a) a relatively clear case of  given that the zone in question formed merely 2 days ago, b) likely to ultimately become a case of  given that it is one of several previous "declared" communities that have spontaneously formed and eventually disappeared in the course of various past Seattle protests, and c) so far has not merited any mainstream media coverage aside from assorted local coverage and minor, intentionally incendiary articles from Fox News, RT,  Sputnik and similar outlets (eliability). There were similar cases of moderately-sized "declared" zones that appeared momentarily in residential areas during the 1999_Seattle_WTO_protests, but none of these have ultimately existed long enough or been impactful enough to merit full articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:NOTABILITY||WP:R)