Deletion of The House of Fine Art

Comment: u|James500}}, {{u|Sam Sailor}}, I wonder if you are aware that  leads to the same paragraph as ? The first sentence there is "{{teal|If a topic has received '''significant coverage''' in '''|reliable sources''' that are '''ndependent sources|independent of the subject''', it is '''presumed''' to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list}}". So perhaps, instead of merely stating "meets/satisfies GNG", you could provide evidence of where you found that significant coverage, why you think the detailed analysis of the sources provided here by {{u|NitinMlk}} is incorrect, and how you think that the sources you've found might satisfy ? Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:I||WP:NCORP||WP:reliable sources)

Comment: I count 11  keep votes, and the only policy based argument I see is that the subject meets  which has been shown to be an erroneous reading of the sources. None of the sources (except one) do in fact satisfy the GNG
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)