Deletion of Ernest R. House

Comment: I have no objections to keeping it if the person is notable. My initial reading of the article was that it did not make any sort of claim of notability. If  criterion 1 is met (and this criterion could be made clearer to help non-specialist readers like myself), the article should summarize the person's influence and contributions. That is cleanup, not AfD, as noted, however. As a start, maybe one of the commenters here could link to the professor's citations and reviews in a section on the talk page
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)