Deletion of Nidal Malik Hasan

Comment: Huge amount of coverage in reliable sources so he clearly passes . The length and density of citations in the article attest to this fact
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The strongest argument I can see for deleting runs like this: ''in order to keep the article, the argument has to be made that this is an exception to . For this to be an exception to , Hasan had to have had a “substantial” role in the Fort Hood killings. And when we say that he had a substantial role, we are necessarily jumping to the conclusion that he is guilty. And by doing that we are violating .'' However, I disagree that we are effectively concluding about Hasan’s guilt. Indeed, if he were innocent, his role is still substantial enough to warrant its own page simply due to the fact that all major media are treating him as guilty and devoting so much time and space to him as a person such that, were he to be exonerated, he would still warrant his own article as a result
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP)