Deletion of Ben Breedlove

Comment: Case of  and Wikipedia not being a memorial
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: There is coverage in reliable sources, albeit for a single event. I suggest we let this one pass for the time being, and suggest opening a further AfD in, say, six months time. This debate reminds me of rticles for deletion/Rhys Morgan a few weeks back, where I went for "Keep" mainly because I believed notable events of his were likely to increase in the future. That probably isn't the case here unless some well known person or organisation picks up this guy's story and runs with it. PS: Claiming Wikipedia is pro censorship is a great way to poison a debate quickly into bickering, distracting from the issues of whether or not an article meets the well known WP quality rules
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: okay, I'll also refer you to ,  and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (:WP:CRYSTAL||:WP:NODEADLINE||:WP:UPANDCOMING)