Deletion of Stanley G. Ellis

Comment: I agree with most of the rationale discussed above. One clarification: most/all of the sourcing is not independent of the subject, (and since no other sources exist, this fails ) but I disagree with the assertion that they are primary sources. The authors of, for example, the church news, would not be the subject of the article and therefore this would be a secondary source. However, since it is not an independent source, that is where it falls short
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)