Deletion of Chronology of Shakespeare's plays – Oxfordian (2nd nomination)

Comment: There is disagreement over the Chronology of Shakespeare's plays, and there is disagreement over the Oxfordian version being discussed here. Both articles present competing viewpoints (although the main Shakespeare chronology disregards most early scholarship on the matter and some notable dissenting viewpoints). In this case, just because there is no wide-spread agreement is no reason to delete the article. Also, there is plenty of information in this article that is NOT repeated in any other article. Comments to the contrary are incorrect on this. The repeated information is there '''''so that NPOV is addressed and readers are clearly aware what the mainstream position is (the repeated bits) and what the minority viewpoint is (the non-repeated bits)'''''. As a ringe topic, views of the adherents are allowed, as long as they are published by independent mainstream publishers etc. That is precisely the case here with Ogburn and Anderson, for example
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Non-free content (WP:F)