Deletion of Eurofins Scientific

Comment: This company passes  per the independent sources comprised of significant coverage about it that were added to the article by User:Tijfo098. Regarding the nomination for deletion being partially based upon the article being unsourced at the time of its nomination, please note that per , topic notability is not correlated with whether or not articles have sources in them: "The absence of citations in an article (as distinct from the non-existence of sources) does not indicate that the subject is not notable." See  and  for further information
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NRVE||WP:N||WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm finding 6,000+ news articles with 1,500 having Eurofins Scientific in the title alone. However, as I scroll through them, I'm seeing press release after press release. There also are many that have Eurofins Scientific among a string of names and many that merely report on the stock status. I'm not going to look through them all. Between that much press coverage, 10K employees, $1B revenues, there probably is enough independent reliable source information for a stand alone article. I think it would be hard to wade through all the non independent/non reliable sources to find  sources to properly cite the article and achieve a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)