Deletion of Safiya Nygaard (2nd nomination)

Comment: WP:Notability|Not notable per |GNG and Wikipedia:Notability (people). |Refbombed with |primary sources. Many references to the same source (at least 10), per above comments of ''"first party self-published sources"'', like the YouTube sources from the subject, might count as providing referencing for content, but all count as one for notability, and content is not the issue here. Prima facie it looks good and also makes "digging through them" harder. Those that are not YouTube are mainly advertising articles. When you click on them you have to wait for a pop-up ad, read it, or wait for a time period to delete. This is advertising and annoying. Refbombing is a good tactic because some (and those that don't check) will think it is referenced enough to be notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:REFBOMB||WP:PRIMARY)

Comment: It looks like |G4 to me, but I tried to tag it and the nomination was removed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G4)