Deletion of Profile Defenders (2nd nomination)

Comment: I'm striking my keep vote and voting delete.  I just spent some more time reading the material thinking I could fix this, but on second glance the sourcing is poor.  For example, the WaPost piece is an opinion column, and the Inc piece is a guest writer.  If you take out the court filings there's not much left.  I think it would just be faster and easier to blow it up, and only rewrite it if enough decent sources can be found.  So I'm going for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: as it fails to meet the notability requirements, especially those set in . While there are a lot of sources mentioned most of them are blogs and interviews (as already mentioned above) which are neither independent nor original
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND)