Deletion of Jahbulon (3rd nomination)

Comment: or '''Merge''' - The article also has problems with , in that 1) the bulk of the article is little more than dictionary definitions, (speculative ones at that) and 2) the article is a subtle form of POV Agenda bashing, which goes against the soap box provision
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: to Christianity and Freemasonry per  and the above.  It is fairly clear that the present state of the article represents the utmost that can be achieved with the sources that are known; this is simply not enough to justify a separate article.  The fact that the term may have some additional relevance in Islam is irrelevant, as far as I can see.  That information, if it is judged useful, can be included in the appropriate Islam-related article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)