Deletion of Thomas Crowther (ecologist)

Comment: Further citations have been added to the article to show that criterion 1 (significant impact within the scholarly discipline) is met under  notability guidelines. A additional textbook featuring Dr. Crowther's soil carbon work https://www.amazon.com/Fungal-Community-Organization-Ecosystem-Mycology/dp/1498706657 as well as a review of the latest research in this field, published in Nature https://www.nature.com/articles/540047a. One of the key aspects to consider in meeting criterion 1 is citation rate. Crowther's major publications featured in the article clearly have an outstanding citation rate (as noted in the above comment. I have also considered Crowther's impact for his overall work. Whilst the limitation of using Google Scholar are referenced in the  notability guidelines, this can be used as a supporting source in this instance. The major publications in the field of ecology (with the highest impact factor) are Nature, Science, PNAS, Nature Climate Change, Nature Ecology & Evolution - citations from all of these journals (and many others in the field) are cited by Google Scholar.  Professor Crowther's research has been cited by his peers 737 times within the last 12 months https://scholar.google.ch/citations?user=EYjCeRIAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao. From a review of other leaders in the field Crowther stands out against those such as Tracey Rogers with 205 citations https://scholar.google.ch/citations?user=GDgxEnYAAAAJ&hl=en, Roberto Cazzolla Gatti with 211 citations https://scholar.google.ch/citations?user=0yBmy5YAAAAJ&hl=en and Jacqueline McGlade with 228 citations. He is driving the field in this area with three times more citations than other notable academics
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SCHOLAR||WP:SCHOLAR)