Deletion of Episource LLC

Comment: on account of lack of significant coverage in multiple sources. All we have are advertorials such as https://aws.amazon.com/solutions/case-studies/episource/ this, an |interview with the CEO (see https://insidebigdata.com/2017/08/24/big-data-makes-mobile-health-care-apps-healthier/ link), etc. The text, incidentally, has been created by the latest mutation of the |single-purpose account: within the space of a few days, we get a flurry of irrelevant contributions (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bora_Bora&diff=prev&oldid=1027441257 here, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Tyrrell_(physician)&diff=prev&oldid=1027586105 here, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=South_Mumbai&diff=prev&oldid=1027595914 here, etc) and then the pay shot of the https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Episource_LLC&action=history acticle creation. A clear case of |promotional work
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PSTS||WP:SPA||WP:PROMO)