Deletion of Prashanth Chandrasekar

Comment: u|Nomadicghumakkad}}, thats a good question to ask. While I dont have a clear answer for you, let me tell you one thing. Im also an AFC reviewer. When I have to review some articles where notability can be questioned in future, I only accept those articles which have a greater chance for survival at AFD. I even do a efore from my side to double check whether any other sources are also available. Because I really dont want my genuinity to be questioned by other users. I still wonder why this article was accepted. None of the sources are not giving enough sigcov to the subject from my opinion. Forbes article is actually giving more importance to some other event rather than the subject. Other two are also not enough to establish GNG even if we combine them all. Moreover, this is an article with 5 sentences, which does not give the  readers an idea about the subject. Leave the part about notability, but I believe this should have been declined at AFC with atleast giving the reason  ''submission provides insufficient context'' Pinging the reviwer {{u|Dial911}} for a clarification from their side. May be Im wrong here. Regards
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)