Deletion of Peter Lewis (philosopher) (3rd nomination)

Comment: The last time this was up for deletion,  was not yet a guideline and some keep votes were based on its not yet being a guideline (e.g., that the "average professor test" has no standing).  Others argued that they found his work interesting, which not not currently a criterion for inclusion.  Based on the information reported in the article, I'd say he fails the notability criteria as currently phrased.  The nominator seems to understate the h-index, though.  The Scholar h-Index Calculator extension for Firefox returns an h-index of 122 for http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Peter+Lewis%22+philosophy&btnG=Search&as_sdt=400000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&query_as=word a Google Scholar search of ''"Peter Lewis" philosophy''.  Still, none of the publications that come up has been cited more than 31 times.  The previous AfD said that a Google search of ''"Peter Lewis" quantum'' turned up a lot of hits, but I don't get an impressive result from http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Peter+Lewis%22+quantum&hl=en&prmd=o&ei=cSRLTNnaIs-HnQe3nvziDQ&start=0&sa=N&cts=1279992952896 that search.  Unless I'm missing something, he looks like a run-of-the-mill associate professor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)