Deletion of Ripple Music

Comment: The applicable guideline is  and not . A lot of the accounts posting to Keep don't appear to understand the criteria for establishing notability for companies or are quoting from other guidelines which have different standards and are not applicable for companies. Here's a summary to help. The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations is  and applies a stricter interpretation of requirements than for other topics. In short,  requires multiple sources (at least two) of |significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc. Also nothing where there is "inherited" notability so the inference that they have signed notable acts only points to the notability of the act, not of the company that signed them. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. If some of the Keep !voters can produce a couple of good references that they are sure meets  and , post them here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:MUSIC||WP:NCORP||WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH)