Deletion of David Shankbone

Comment: Seems absolutely notable under every interpretation of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Delete''' The sources don't address the subject in substantial detail, so this doesn't meet . All we have is a pile of trivia. He acts like a journalist and gets a lot of interviews -- so do thousands of other people who get published. Same goes for photographs. Even the Columbia Journalism Review article, which might have substantial coverage of him, is used for trivia. There doesn't seem to be any source out there that gives us the depth of coverage needed for an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)