Deletion of Praise and veneration of Muhammad

Comment: A very hilarious reason for deleting has been provided which should be included in  and reasons for not nominating an article. I literally looked twice to make sure I was reading it right. The thing that is so wrong with this article is that it "Looks like a overtly positive article", yes gentlemen, we should delete an article about veneration because it discusses veneration. and Even if the article is titled "Praise and veneration of XXXXXXX" it should '''not''' include positive views? Can someone just shoot me already. Another concern seems to be that the article has  and  issues,,,,,,,,,,,and should therefore be '''DELETED''' instead of being improved. I hang my head in shame at this view and would like to say that articles with these issues are to be improved instead of deleted. The topic "Praise and veneration of Muhammad" is encyclopedic in nature and has quite a lot of encyclopedic value and therefore it makes sense. Can the article be improved? YES. Should the article be just wiped off the face of wiki just because there is room for improvement there? '''NO''', and I do hope we do not set a precedent here. Appears to be a classic case of  from the nom as he thinks that only topics critical of the subject are allowed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Complete bollocks (WP:BULLSHIT||WP:PRIMARY||WP:QUOTE||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)