Deletion of Worldwide energy supply (2nd nomination)

Comment: The article sources and a  style search shows multiple in depth reliable sources for this topic, e.g, http://www.americanscientist.org/libraries/documents/20110411120400vqiscvo4gy/2011411121708479-2011-05Smil.pdf, https://books.google.com/books?id=MZ3DklIQuT0C&pg=PA408&dq=Global+%22energy+supply%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjnue6S0aTQAhVhxVQKHXA0BvgQ6AEIPjAF#v=onepage&q=%22energy%20supply%22&f=false. This topic seems solidly notable and just the sort of topic we should cover in an encyclopedia.Although it is clear that there is some sort of long-running editorial dispute, we don't delete articles because of contented sources; rather we build consensus and delete any original research. A notable topic with no insurmountable article problems suggests keeping the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)