Deletion of Earliest documented people

Comment: I don't agree with the nom's reasoning; even if a candidate for inclusion on the list is disputed, all that is needed is a reputable source and a discussion in the article of controversy. That in itself doesn't mean the article should be deleted. However, as of now it doesn't seem any sources do exist to provide the information this article seeks to provide: namely who are the "earliest documented people." As such, any attempt to synthesize existing articles would seem to break 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)