Deletion of Pottsylvania

Comment: In-universe" is a guideline on how to and how not to phrase fiction articles, it is not a reason for deletion.  The show was 40 years ago, I'm sure if someone starts digging through periodicals they could find dozens of references.  See also 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: This is one of those cases where I feel that  is somewhat appropriate. Gtstricky and Shoehorn make fairly cogent arguments that (intentionally or unintentionally) support this. The article has a couple of references which seem to confirm the external notability, even if the coverage in those sources isn't "highly significant" in Wikipedia terms. The existing sources for these notability assertions and the assertions themselves hint at a strong potential for coverage in academic works, particularly those examining Cold War media. A cursory internet search doesn't turn up much in this regard, but at the same time, it doesn't turn up much of any source material published before 2000. It is likely that any significant source material is not well-archived online at this point, given the non-recentness of the information. I support the decision to place a tag for citation improvement on the article, as has already been done, but those participating in AfDs need to remember that |there is no deadline on Wikipedia, and that AfD is NOT the place to get articles improved
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:DEADLINE)