Deletion of Sultan ul Faqr Publications

Comment: The article should not be deleted. I have done some research on it and found that this publication does meet  https://www.google.com/search?q=books%20on%20faqr&rct=j. It is not only about the publication, it is also about the work that the publication is doing. The books it publishes are popular and notable …People turn to Wikipedia to learn about the credentials of a particular topic and this is what Wikipedia users want. The primary purpose of an encyclopedia is to provide information and providing sources is secondary. To say that the article of a particular publication should be removed because it not notable is ticking off the fact that users are only going to learn about the publication from Wikipedia itself and this in itself a necessary criteria for the article to keep. The contributions made by this publication with reference to Islam/Sufism cannot be disregarded.  It would not be wrong to call them unique or prolific in the field of Sufism. Give me one good reason for deleting this article based on publication and not any other article on publication from the List of Urdu language book publishing companies.  Be fair and offer justice here on Wikipedia. All the web sources cited talk about Sultan ul Faqr Publications.  Despite the references, the publication house is clearly known for its books all over the web as well as nationally in Pakistan. The article does not violate any Wikipedia rule. In fact, Wikipedia itself encourages publishing material relevant to the notability focusing on high-quality secondary or external sources which in this case have been cited as Britannica, Marymartin, ISSUE, etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)