Deletion of Dipankar Home

Comment: Meets  criterion 3: he has "created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of … multiple independent periodical articles or reviews" as evidenced by http://www.dipankarhome.com/About%20me%20Details.html the press cuttings on his website that include full-length, positive reviews of his books in ''The Times Higher Education Supplement'', ''Physics Today'' and ''Foundations of Physics''. In addition, http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=Bf9&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&q=%22dipankar%20home%22%20%22riddles%20in%20your%20teacup%22%20review&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws Google finds reviews of both the hardback and paperback editions of his book ''Riddles in your Teacup - Fun with Everyday Scientific Puzzles'' in ''New Scientist'', although these aren't mentioned on his webpage (possibly they weren't so positive, but that's not relevant to the criterion). The fact that Forewards to his books have been written by Anthony Leggett, Roger Penrose and Paul Davies should surely count for something too. I did also check citations counts for his journal articles in Web of Science: it reckons his h-index is 13, with top 5 articles cited 95, 50, 43, 38, 33 times, which doesn't seem all that impressive in absolute terms, but I'm not sure how that compares to others working on theoretical foundations of physics. Should take into account that his papers only have two or three authors, fewer than typical in many areas of science and medicine
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)