Deletion of ARDOR

Comment: or draftify and AfC) - mentions and coverage in non-reliable sources are not sufficient to establish notability. It seems simply  for this topic (and repeated  arguments are invalid for such discussions). I would support Thomas' alternative suggestion to draftify the article to improve it, when better sources become available with in-depth coverage. The entire article needs an almost complete rewrite though to remove all the trivia, irrelevant tangents, low-quality sources and non-neutral language - most of the current content is not suitable for a dispassionate non-promotional article. It should also go through AfC then to allow reviewing by an unbiased editor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: we should probably look at  per my comment at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Qtum
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)