Deletion of Exposed: The Climate of Fear

Comment: I'm going to leave to others the argument about this show being notable (imho its not). And instead give some good reasons for it to be deleted as a strict  issue: The entire article is based upon a specific editors selective quoting from the transcript of the show. Stringing these together is a series of  statements, such as ''Beck proposed explanations for global warming, and while stating that the Earth is warming,'' ...continuing... ''his one-hour documentary presented the views of Scientists_who_oppose_the_global_warming_consensus|scientists who don't believe that global warming is caused by humans.''. For the first sentence: Where is that explanation? and what does it consist of? Answer: Ask the editor - since the show doesn't give such an explanation. For the second sentence: Say's who? Answer: The editor. John Christy for instance does  believe that humans have a finger in global warming. (he contests the amount - or rather if its catastrophic). We do not have a |reliable source summarizing this show - or to give hints to the editors on which parts to focus or expand. Its a freebie ride to quote whatever random part of the show to match your own POV (or in this case the editors). For other examples, lets take headlines: "Experts on Kyoto" ... says who? John Christy certainly isn't. Nice touch with the quote from Al Gore (very much taken out of context - but used in the same way in the show). "Global Warming Crowd" who are these? The show doesn't say (transcript doesn't even have the word: Crowd). "Intimidation Tactics" - the word Intimidation doesn't appear in the transcript - why is it in quotation marks? etc. etc. etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:OR||WP:RS)