Deletion of Place of power

Comment: Jytdog and QuackGuru should remember than MEDRS does not apply here. Perhaps this is all aery-faery nonsense, but it is also otable nonsense, believed by many people for thousands of years and written about by a good many of them. In particular, written about them since the coincidence of the 1920s boom in post-WWI English spiritualism and the rise of the private motor car for rural touring. Alfred Watkins and Julian Cope would be two obvious starting points for English or British and US sites. Perhaps Copey will follow ''Japrocksampler'' with a third volume of ''The Modern Antiquarian|The Japanese Antiquarian'', as that's a country rife with such sites and hardly discussed in Western, English language sources. There are plenty of sources for this topic, even limiting to pre-internet printed sources, so I fail to see why some (perhaps unwise) use of "spam sites" changes this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Just because a handful to reliable sources use the same combination of three words doesn't mean they're referring to the same thing (i.e. subject). There is no evidence that "place of power" as used across these sources is anything other than a phrase. As such, I agree with {{u|JudeccaXIII}} that  applies, and in particular . Since I don't believe we have any reliable sources covering the social or historical significance of the phrase "place of power," I do not believe it is sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. (I'm not watching this page so please ping me if you want my attention
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NAD||WP:WORDISSUBJECT)