Deletion of Sexuality in Star Trek (2nd nomination)

Comment: The nomination seems counter-factual as the article contains sources such as ''Sexuality and Sex-Role Stereotyping in Star Trek'' which clearly support the topic.  And the rest just seems to be the argument to avoid of  which is not policy.  And the article still has reasonable scope for improvement per our |editing policy.  For example, the source ''http://www.jstor.org/pss/4239567 Sex and Star Trek'' hasn't been mentioned yet
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WEDONTNEEDIT||WP:IMPERFECT)