Deletion of Lisolette Gilcrest

Comment: This subject fails  for lack of substantial coverage in reliable sources. She does get lots of mention in lists of names, in somewhat reliable and unreliable sources. But |nothing significant. Going through , sources showed the article contained a lot of puff. The  in fact indicate http://eroticsignature.com/joomla2/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=72&Itemid=83 a brief mention, http://www.eroticsignature.com/joomla2/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=74&Itemid=86 her name among 119 artists exhibited, and http://www.eroticsignature.com/joomla2/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=154&Itemid=134 her name in a long list of book prize recipients. There's also her name in a pile of very brief http://thenewsherald.com/articles/2008/10/24/entertainment/doc48ff26c24a56b895355034.txt?viewmode=fullstory entertainment listings, and a minuscule mention in the promotional http://www.realdetroitweekly.com/detroit/stae-and-canvas-february-6-2008/Content?oid=1203282 upcoming event announcement. The first shows she exists; the second can't really support prose on events that hadn't happened as of publication. I found confirmation in the Detroit Free Press that she had an exhibit at a local arts festival, but the coverage was about the festival, and only mentioned this subject. All of this indicates she falls short of both  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:42||WP:BEFORE||WP:LOTSOFSOURCES||WP:CREATIVE||WP:ANYBIO||WP:42)