Deletion of Islam and censorship

Comment: Due to change in title. Let me stipulate that I agree with almost all points Roscelese and NarSakSasLee have made. It is a terrible article. It has  within it, there are multiple editors adding criticisms of Muslims or the actions of some Muslims as censorship, when they clearly aren't, plus there is a confusion between the actions of autocratic regimes (which, whether secular or religious, always censor free speech) with their religious character. The question I now ask myself is not whether it is a good article (it isn't) nor whether the article as written violates WP principles (it does), but whether an article CAN be written on the subject. I also agree that to get there, it has to be mercilessly slashed, but falls short of WP:TNT
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)