Deletion of Mitchel P. Goldman

Comment: and fix: The subject's publications have been cited 9,375 times, with an h-index of 55 (i.e. 55 of the subject's publications have been cited over 55 times): which clearly shows that the subject has made a significant impact in his field, thus it meets #1. I don't see any very major issues in the article (not much promotional content): no need to delete and start over again (see  § c1). The article has since (after the block of {{u|Morning277}} for long-term abuse and sockpuppetry) been substantially edited by non-affiliated editors to remove the promotional content
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMICS||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per . Horrific article with vastly inadequate and promotional sourcing (an Amazon author profile? Really?) Goldman meets  and we should have an article on him, but this is irredeemable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:ACADEMIC)