Deletion of James Heartfield

Comment: with a number of reviews including https://www.jstor.org/stable/41999451 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/victorianstudies.56.3.522 https://www.jstor.org/stable/24047001 and the ones found by {{ping|Elemimele}} he passes . {{ping|Maud.Clowd}} Generally academic reviews are counted towards notability per . I would fail to see how reviews in academic journals are less important than other reviews, I would rather suggest that they are held to a higher standard and assess scholarly contribution. In general as long as the venue in which the review appears is reliable, we can use it -- there are many niche genres outside academia where authors become notable by being reviewed in a specialized journal (eg science fiction etc). Given that multiple books of his have multiple reviews, this also means  doesnt apply here but this shows a consistent streak of recognized scholarship
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:BLP1E)