Deletion of Kresimir Chris Kunej (2nd nomination)

Comment: The article's focus is on the learned work that the subject has done (translating textbooks, writing technical papers, and such), so  is indeed the appropriate metric. As with the majority of hopefuls, he has to be tested on  #1 because he clearly does not pass any of the other criteria. (With all due respect, there seems to be some basic confusion on what constitutes a pass on some of these criteria, for example testimonials on how someone's work changed the protocol in a narrow area of study or how their work was required reading at one specific institution certainly don't satisfy  #4 &ndash; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kresimir Chris Kunej|prev AfD for specifics.) Disinterested inspection of the body of his work is conclusive: he has 0 hits and 0 citations (h-index = 0) for research work in the standard indexes (WoS, GS). The article clearly claims research publications, but my guess is that these articles actually appear in something like trade publications. For example, "Translator: Journal of the Croatian Association of Scientific and Technical Translators" seems to be the official publication of a http://www.drustvoprevoditelja.htnet.hr/desni_engl.html translation agency. (Article seems to confirm this: "Kunej's most notable publication is a professional article/paper he wrote in 2003 entitled “Analysis of Translations from Croatian to English and Vice-Versa Along with Suggestions for Improving the Profession” 1 that was published by the Croatian Association of Technical and Scientific Translators 5 in their trade publication"). The article is also heavily loaded with pointers to other white-papers and unpublished material that contribute nothing toward notability. There is also the usual confusion related to the media, i.e. mistaking a brief appearance related to an event for substantive coverage of the subject himself. The red-flags are numerous, including listing how many minutes into the broadcast the subject appears, listing individual institutions that make trivial mention of his work, e.g. "the wedding customs book is mentioned also online on the Rijeka City Library website", etc. I think it is very clear that the article's content strains to manufacture notability where none (perhaps yet) exists. Respectfully
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF)