Deletion of Katie Rodan

Comment: I've been thinking a lot about this one. DGG and Doc James make good sense. If this was created as a promo piece to help her earn more money, then it should be deleted. We have the clear ''"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_policies_and_guidelines_to_cite_in_deletion_debates#Favoring_deletion List of policies and guidelines that can be used for making one's case in proposing a page for deletion"''. One of them is . So, was this created for that reason? Quite obviously. The creator has admitted working for Rodan, has made only edits to this article and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Farzad_Nazem&type=revision&diff=646847259&oldid=634072303 one other. Both of these are about corporate people. It is very likely the creator is a business associate being paid rather than, say, someone in her sewing circle doing her a favour
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMOTION)