Deletion of Richard Onses

Comment: Nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from actually having to clear  on his sources: businesspeople are not automatically notable just because they exist, writers are not automatically notable just because their writing technically metaverifies its own existence, unsuccessful political candidates are not automatically notable just because it's possible to verify their vote totals, and on and so forth. The article is not well-sourced, and nothing stated in the article body hands him an automatic notability freebie in the absence of much better sourcing than this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)