Deletion of Latino Women and their Migrations to America

Comment: for several reasons ... ((1)) after a review of available sources and coverage, I consider the subject to be notable (to me,  does not apply): (a) here is a https://www.dukeupress.edu/Women-and-Migration-in-the-US-Mexico-Borderlands/ book published by Duke University (b) here is a http://www.un.org/esa/population/meetings/ittmigdev2005/P14_JMartinez_ECLAC.pdf United Nations publication that has a lot of detail on immigration of Latino women vs men, (c) here is an http://www.ipsnews.net/2006/03/migration-latin-america-many-women-seek-new-life-across-borders/ article specifically on the subject of migration of Latino women; ((2)) based on the availability of sources mentioned, the article can develop such that it will not read as original research (yes, there are ''possible'' reliable sources, so to me,  does not apply). The nomination reason is ''unsourced'', but this is not one of the -REASON|fourteen reasons for deletion. Instead the deletion policy (reason #6) focuses on the ''impossibility'' of reliable sources for attribution; ((3)) this subject may seem obscure to most editors/contributors, but let's remember  and realize that there is room in WP for articles that are tightly focused, they simply must be notable, as I consider this subject to be after my review of this nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL8||WP:DEL6||WP:DEL||WP:NOTPAPER)