Deletion of Navy Field (2nd nomination)

Comment: Let's look at the ''three'' sources again. http://mmohut.com/review/navy-field is a review from a site pretty much run by two brothers http://mmohut.com/about, so it fails  ("Base articles on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Sources should directly support the material presented in an article and should be appropriate to the claims made. The appropriateness of any source depends on the context. In general, the best sources have a professional structure in place for checking or analyzing facts, legal issues, evidence, and arguments; as a rule of thumb, the greater the degree of scrutiny given to these issues, the more reliable the source.") http://www.mmortsgamers.com/reviews/mmo-rts/navyfield-us.html offers a TWO sentence review, and is a site run by probably one person, again failing . http://www.subsim.com/ssr/navy_field/review_navy_field_subs.php seems to be the only site that perhaps has some editorial oversight. But it's still a weak source. This article clearly doesn't meet 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:V||WP:NOTE)