Deletion of Crocker Park

Comment: Notwithstanding the sources added, I still think that it doesnt qualify for its own article. Sources are not reliable (in the sense that they are not '''independent''' WP:RS authored by 1) the company that owns Crocker Park and 2) the Crocker Park official site. In my opinion it does not satsify  and is at odds with . I think that ''part'' of the article may be '''merged''' as a point of interest (as argued above), but on the whole it should '''not be redirected''' and be '''deleted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:NOTADVERTISING)