Deletion of Adam Kontras (2nd nomination)

Comment: Sidestepping the obvious and admitted cyberstalking and persistent vandalism, it appears to me that Adam Kontras fulfills the  criteria of ''Creative professionals'': "The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique.", as well as ''Entertainers'': "Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.". In addition, as happened with the last AfD, even more sources have been uncovered, including one in a physical book: http://books.google.com/books?id=grhR1eYswPkC&lpg=PA37&dq=%22Adam%20Kontras%22%20-inpublisher%3Aicon&as_brr=0&pg=PA37#v=onepage&q=%22Adam%20Kontras%22%20-inpublisher:icon&f=false Naked Lens: Video Blogging & Video Journaling to Reclaim the YOU in YouTube™ by Michael Sean Kaminsky. It has been cited in source after source that Adam Kontras is the first known video blogger. That in itself should be enough to fulfill the notability requirements. However, Kontras has also hosted a segment on CBS's The Early Show, and prior to moving to California was a radio personality on two different stations in Columbus. Some of this is already cited in the article; some of it may not be. Either way, the "self-references" are not inherently bad, as they help provide more detailed information. All of the major facts are also cited from external sources. I hope this discussion can focus on the actual content of Adam Kontras the article instead of whatever vendetta Charles Grove has against Adam Kontras the person. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)