Deletion of Ginger Jolie

Comment: The nominator sent me an e-mail requesting the article be deleted, and I replied that AFD was the way to go. However this topic passes notability requirements. The fact this individual has appeared in Penthouse creates notability. The fact this person appeared in such publications and other related work is not Wikipedia's problem. Paul Newman spent much of his professional career bemoaning a terrible film called The Silver Chalice that he made early in his career; but he couldn't take it back. OBVIOUSLY, and this I also noted to the nom, if there is anything untrue in this article, or poorly sourced, then under  it has to go. But the fact she was in major magazines, worked for Andrew Blake (major name director in the genre) and so forth -- this can be verified
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Seems notable and I don't think that inconvenience is a reason to invoke 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: According to lp#Deletion|BLP, the AFD '''is''' the place to discuss it. We do handle biographies of living people very carefully so we don't harm anyone with inaccuracies, but this article seems to be well within policy. iographies_of_living_persons/Help has info for people who want to have their own article deleted, although I am not sure it will help much. I have to admit that I am against with the idea of deleting an article ONLY because the person it covers wants it deleted, purely on principal. While I try to empathise, Wikipedia's role is document facts that can be verified only, not to decide who it helps or hurts. I am sure that MANY non-living persons would also like to have their articles deleted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B||WP:B)