Deletion of Sarah Schaack

Comment: I had earlier (after the AfD nomination but before DE updates and revisions to the article) added a mention to the article regarding the Lynwood W. Swanson Promise for Scientific Research Award from the M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust, which is a reasonably significant award, certainly counting towards #C1. A few comments to the nominator: The NSF grant in question was not an ordinary grant but a National Science Foundation CAREER Award. These grants are much more prestigious and harder to get than ordinary grants, and they do contribute to academic notability, at least somewhat. In fact I think this info should be re-added to the article. About the h-index of 18. There is no such thing as a standard h-index for an Associate Professor. H-index varies greatly by discipline (and also by the source of data used, GScholar, WebOfScience, Scopus etc). In lower citation disciplines like mathematics most full professors probably retire with GScholar h-index lower than 18. Sarah Schaack works in a higher citation field but still even there, for somebody to reach an h-index of 18 in ten years (her Phd is from 2008) looks impressive to me. In any case, I think there is enough here to satisfy #C1, for the reasons above and those given by David Eppsein
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)