Deletion of Mustafa Ülgen

Comment: The links above would seem to show that the subject passes . The article can easily fixed by a bit of copyediting and cutting the list of publications to just the most important ones. Conflict of interest is not a reason to delete, but simply for other editors to review content for neutrality - I, for one, have this on my watchlist now so I can help out with this. COI is also much less of a problem when it is disclosed. Dentists might not be as exciting as TV talent show contestants but it is possible to write encyclopedia articles about them. Just a couple of weeks ago I found an article tagged for deletion whose entire prose content was ''"Sheldon Friel was an Irish dentist"'' but I think (blowing my own trumpet) that I managed to turn it into a pretty decent start-class article. The only things stopping me from doing the same with this one are physical and linguistic access to sources - I doubt whether any of the sources for this subject would be available in my local library and even if they were I wouldn't be able to read them. The point of the additional notablity criteria such as  is that they are strong indicators that reliable sources exist, even if they are not online and in English. We already have enough sources for |verifiability of the main facts in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:V)

Comment: The main tests I could see applying here are  criteria 1 and/or 4. His textbook would seem to claim #4, but I'm not in a position to judge its impact. However, his publication record looks insufficient for #1. Web of Science, liberally searching on "Author=(ulgen m*), Refined by: Subject Areas=(DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE)", lists 4 publications, all from Am. J. Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthoped., having 12, 10, 5, and 5 citations respectively. Note that this article lists a veritable boatload of other publications (some of which seem to be various editions of his textbook). Most of the "journal articles" are from "Faculty of Dentistry Magazine" from several different universities &ndash; these are almost certainly not peer-reviewed research publications. Likely ditto for "Pedodontics Magazine". Roughly a dozen other articles from "Turkish Journal of Orthodontics", but it is unclear whether this is a standard research journal for the profession. Answer seems to be in the nagative, since it is not in the list of over 50 dental journals indexed by WoS (J. Dent. Res., J. Endodontics, J. Clin. Peridontology, etc.). Respectfully
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)