Deletion of Arthur Rubin (6th nomination)

Comment: Now that the citation record has been established, it is clear that it is not enough to pass rof#C1. There is one highly cited paper (~ 900 cites) written with a distinguished mathematician and another coauthor. The few other papers published have had coauthors and few citations, so there is little evidence of independent achievement. The student awards do not satisfy rof#C2. The consensus here, which I agree with, is that rof is not passed. Neither is olitician. One case for keep that is at least coherent has been made by Eppstein, who argues that although the student awards do not qualify for rof, they pass  when suppoprted by the media references. Other editors have agued that the references do not give the substantial coverage required by . I agree, and agree that there is no pass of  either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:P||WP:P||WP:P||WP:P||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)