Deletion of Patricia King (evangelist)

Comment: What we have here is basically a PR résumé for a person who exists, rather than an encyclopedia article about a person who satisfies any specific notability rule. Prior to being tackled by the clean 'n scrub union, this was based ''entirely'' on her own |primary source content about herself with the ''sole'' exception of the SPLC citation — and the problem with the SPLC reference isn't that the SPLC are "hatemongers" (which is not a claim that would pass even the most cursory test for ), but that it didn't even properly |verify the content being cited to it. Nothing left here now is a strong claim of notability, none of it is |properly sourced at all, and Wikipedia is ''not'' a free publicity platform on which a person is ''entitled'' to keep an unsourced or primary sourced article just because she ''exists
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:NPOV||WP:V||WP:RS)