Deletion of Veda Scott (2nd nomination)

Comment: Ping|Starship.paint}} As I am sure you know, Google hits are meaningless for purposes of determining notability per  and .  Have you reviewed these sources in any depth?  I've just waded through several dozen, and I am not impressed.  Most, if not all, of these sources appear to be fansites, blogs or industry promotional sites, and the "Veda Scott" mentions seem to be  coverage or trivial one-sentence mentions.  Lots of video clips, too.  Can you pull five or six sources out of the 300+ which are (a) reliable sources per , (b) independent sources, i.e., not industry promotions, and (c) include significant, non-trivial coverage of Veda Scott individually?  Oh, and don't forget: multiple stories/articles from the same website, newspaper or other publication count as a single source, and we need multiple sources to establish notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT||WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE||WP:RS)

Comment: Starship weeded out unreliable sources and specifically searched for sites which the Pro Wrestling Wikiproject have deemed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Professional_wrestling/Style_guide#Sources reliable.  That said, most are passing mentions.  Those which include her in the headline are videos (http://www.wrestleview.com/roh-indy-wrestling-news/49208-video-veda-scott-talks-aiw-absolution-ix-on-6-29http://www.wrestleview.com/roh-indy-wrestling-news/48663-video-veda-scott-talks-tonight-s-5-23-aiw-live-event) or http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/Wrestling/Microgalleries/ShimmerApr2014/2014/04/14/21601556.html this.  She's definitely covered more than she was when the first AfD happened but I'm not sure if she passes the  yet
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)