Deletion of Arbella Ewing

Comment: There's nothing encyclopedic here.The lede has more information about other people than it does about the subject. It's all about where the subject stood in relation to other especially long-lived people in a mythical competition to breathe longer.The body is similarly bereft of anything that belongs in an encyclopedia. Her family considered her a gem and attributed her longevity to positive thinking. Her parents were from Mississippi. She broke her hip at one of her last birthday parties and wound up in a nursing home. She lived, worked, married, had a child and died. Far from "an exceptionally strong claim of notability", there's barely any at all.|Notability requires |significant coverage in multiple, independent |reliable sources.  What we have here is profoundly insignificant coverage, and all for the non-inherently notable attribute of deferring the visit of the Grim Reaper a bit longer than most. Birthday greetings and an obit, plus a mention on a GRG table of old people who died in 2008 just doesn't cut it.Arguing in the alternative, if others think this null set of a subject does scrape by our |general notability guideline, (although how, I cannot imagine) then OPAGE counsels that a list and not a stand-alone article is the proper resolution here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:NOPAGE)