Deletion of Edna Jeffrey

Comment: The only reliable source in the whole article is the ''San Francisco Bay Guardian'', and that is only used to support ing of the awards that newspaper gave to Finnila's Bathhouse. There's no link to an online version but, from the way that source is used, I assume that it gives no significant coverage (probably none at all) to Jeffrey. In any case, |notability is not inherited by the owner of a possibly notable business.  I was unable to find any reliable sources at all for Edna Jeffrey, her book or the movie that's allegedly being made of it so the subject seems to fail  and . The article doesn't claim she's notable in any other way, so I don't see any other notability criteria that could be applied. Her book completely fails  – I couldn't find a single review – and the movie is . I doubt it will ever be made, since the biography of the screenwriter cited in the article http://forbidden.bravesites.com/thom-racina- mentions nothing after 2005 and the domain movieforbidden.com (also cited in the article) was registered in 2009, suggesting that this material is several years old and going nowhere. I see no reason at  to have a redirect and I disagree with a redirect since, if anyone is interested in Jeffrey, it is more likely to be because of her novel and/or the movie, than because of curiosity about a business that closed in 2000
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR||WP:BK||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:REDIRECT)