Deletion of Derek Chauvin

Comment: I don't really have a preference whether the biography of Chauvin is on a stand-alone page, or merged into another page. However, the  policy and the  guideline suggest having a separate article (not a redirect), whereas  suggests a redirect, and  suggests doing whichever is better for the reader's understanding
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO1E||WP:CRIME||WP:PAGEDECIDE)

Comment: this article is a fork of Killing of George Floyd, there is essentially no information in it which isn't in that article. The "Background" and "Involvement in the killing of George Floyd" sections, which make up most of it, were copied and pasted from Killing of George Floyd (without attribution, making this article a copyright violation). The remaining content doesn't offer anything which isn't covered in that article, aside from a few trivial details such as his marital status. Furthermore  says that someone known in connection with a criminal event shouldn't have a standalone article if they can be adequately covered in some other article. That is clearly the case here as all the information in this article is also in Killing of George Floyd.  also advises against having articles on alleged perpetrators of crimes who have not been convicted, here the subject hasn't
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIME||WP:CRIME)