Deletion of Sarah Thomson (politician)

Comment: There is no hierarchy of notability guidelines. Each guideline is just a guideline. They only create presumptions of notability. When guidelines create conflicting presumptions in a single case they should be balanced together with common sense, as follows: in this case, on balance, the extent to which the subject passes the general notability guideline outweighs the extent to which she fails 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: I don't think anyone is saying she meets , but I believe she meets . Furthermore, POLITICIAN states that ''"In the case of candidates for political office who do not meet this guideline, the general rule is to redirect to an appropriate page covering the election or political office sought in lieu of deletion. Relevant material from the biographical article can be merged into the election or political office page if appropriate."''. So redirect, rather than outright deletion, would be the appropriate course of action if the result here is not "keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:GNG)

Comment: I have tagged this article for |rescue
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron (WP:ARS)