Deletion of Insurrextion (2003)

Comment: Firstly, it sounds like the nominator should have taken this to articles to merge rather than delete, but that is beside the point. Consensus has always been that all WWE pay-per-view events due to their nature and coverage are independently notable. Every single WWE pay-per-view outside of this series, had their own pages prior to their creation. His rationale given here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Slashme&diff=837428550&oldid=837379635&diffmode=source sounds to me like his biggest issue is that they are stubs, which is not reason for deletion, it just means I haven't finished expanding yet. Also there are several  that still mention these in more recent years http://www.skysports.com/wwe/news/14203/10929535/vote-worst-wwe-pay-per-view-names https://superluchas.com/los-ocho-peores-nombres-pay-per-view-ha-tenido-wwe-historia/ https://www.vavel.com/en-us/wrestling/2017/12/08/856514-wwe-reportedly-discussing-australian-ppv.html
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)