Deletion of Kittie May Ellis (second nomination)

Comment: per nom (and nearly a speedy as an attempt to re-create a deleted article). I recall that past commentors had some serious concerns about |verification. I also think it may be difficult to verify some of the claims in the article. One such claim is that Ellis is "one of" or "the only" narrative, first-person sources of information for the Pacific Northwest. For example, one would have to comb the Hudson Bay Co. archives, various university libraries, and state and provincial archives to ensure that there are no such other first person accounts of life in what is now Washington and B.C. for this time period. I am also a bit concerned because the creator of this article verges on |incivility (as can be seen in this discussion) and acts in a manner that is |overly possessive. That, however, is not a reason for deletion, it's just a concern about the constant appearance and disappearance of this article. The creator of the article is not helping his cause by such behaviour
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:CIVIL||WP:OWN)