Deletion of Lois de Menil

Comment: I did not wade through the sock-wall-of-text above, but simply took a quick look at the article and sources. Article has plenty of  and lots of entries in the biblio that are not . I thought maybe the Vanity Fair (magazine)|Vanity Fair piece would lend some weight, but it is basically about the family with a focus on a few members &ndash; Lois is only mentioned, somewhat trivially, a few times. From what I take of the article, it is clear that she is not notable ''per se''.  may be a relevant guideline (since she has a PhD and is associated with a research institution) and her book "Who speaks for Europe" is held in ~500 institutions, but we normally set the bar for c1 in this guideline to having at least 2 such "well-held" (noted) publications. Perhaps simply 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:PROF||WP:TOOSOON)