Deletion of Blood Out (film)

Comment: SW:  |Article topics must be notable, or "worthy of notice." Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things like fame, importance, or popularity—'''although those may enhance''' the acceptability of a subject that meets the guidelines.  A topic is presumed to merit an article if it meets the '''general notability guidelines''' and is not excluded by OT. A topic '''can also''' be considered notable if it meets the criteria outlined in any of the subject-specific guidelines listed on the right...."  The subsections of  do not overrule the |main notability guideline page... they support it and allow further considerations toward notability, and guideline are not set to be mutually exclusionary. Someone may fail GNG but pass ANYBIO.  Someone might fail ANYBIO but pass GNG. So sorry... the topic does pass both  and FF... through the notability of its production, as NFF is set in place to acknowledge that unreleased films might be found |notable through production receiving coverage in reliable sources... as this one is.... and there is absolutely no hint of it being in "production hell".... quite the opposite.  Further, it has distribution in place and a tentative release set for the end of the year. Lionsgate has locked distribution in the US, UK, and Canada... and Cinema Management Group of Los Angeles has locked sales in (so far) Australia, New Zealand, Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, Latin America, Poland, Turkey, Hungary, the Czech and Slovak Republics, Scandinavia, and the Middle East... seems folks want to show this film.  Now had this film been something merely "rumored", or something still in still in "pre-production", I might tend to agree... but that's not the case. Considering who is involved, coverage has been continuing... and it is a bit of a strech to think that coverage |might somehow decrease as release draws near... and heck, even total failures that were never released can and have occasionally been found notable enough for Wikipedia... but hey... this ain't been claimed or shown a failure here by anyone
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:NFF||WP:GNG||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Covered in enough reliable, independent sources to make it |notable regardless of what FF says
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NFF)