Deletion of Christopher O'Neill

Comment: Sources are good enough for verifiability and the subject passes  with flying colours, as far as I'm concerned. As for his role as merely husband to someone who happens to belong to the Swedish royal family, and that he has undertakes no royal duties, well, he's still become part of the family whether he likes it or not, he's been treated much like Princess Sofia, Duchess of Värmland|Sofia or Prince Daniel, Duke of Västergötland|Daniel in the Swedish press, where he has definitely not been out of the spotlight, as the sources here, in the Swedish Wikipedia article and even more so a basic search in w:sv:Mediearkivet|Mediearkivet show. It's unfortunate in some ways, but it's not for him to decide
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as there is sufficent in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources to pass . In this I discount '''all''' the kungahuset.se references and notably take into account the sources mentioned by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)