Deletion of Flirtomatic

Comment: I appreciate the authors' contention that this article meets , but fail to see how we can write a |verifiable |neutral point of view article about a topic with no coverage in secondary sources.  We can't, and are left with an article that is uncited promotional material and/or |original research by editors with an obvious |conflict of interest.    I think in this case there is an inconsistency between the aforementioned principles of +++ and , and the first four principles should trump.  Of course, if this has been the subject of nontrivial articles in reliable sources, then by all means keep, but I don't see those citations in the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:OR||WP:COI||WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:OR||WP:COI||WP:WEB)