Deletion of Humayun Khan (soldier)

Comment: My thinking when creating the article on the parents was largely along the lines of what {{u|Cullen328}} says above, and how I described it on Talk:Khizr and Ghazala Khan|that talk page. There's no question that there's enough significant coverage of them to satisfy notability. I think there's more than enough to justify an article independent of the convention, too, given there have been new developments that have kept them among the top national headlines every day since the speech (e.g. just a few hours ago http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/03/us/politics/donald-trump-gop.html from the NY Times -- not the best source, because it's more about Trump than the Khans, but not all of the sources have to have them as the primary subject). There's a valid question of whether, per , it would make sense to move the article about the parents to an article about the speech (not the campaign/convention), but I think a biography is justified and that discussion can always happen down the road. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: I'd like to point of that  ''creates an assumption, not a guarantee, that a subject should be included'', it isn't the end all be all criteria for inclusion. Generally failing the inclusion guideline for Biographies  (which this does by a wide mark), it defaults over the  for military personnel. Frankly he died 12 years ago and was barely mentioned as one of many unfortunate casualties in the Iraq War. All the in depth coverage that has developed recently is directly caused by a one time event at a political function
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:SOLDIER)