Deletion of MySupermarket (3rd nomination)

Comment: just a shopping web site. Raised about $15M which strongly suggests it's  for an encyclopedia article. The coverage is shallow and the reviews offered are routine, as in
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: but '''rewrite from scratch.''' (I have accordingly tagged the article with a {{tl|rewrite}} template.) The deletion advocates have a point about the majority of the sources. The principal problem with most of the sources is lack of independence: they are too heavily sourced from mySupermarket itself. On the other hand, enough independent, reliable sources remain that they should allow an article to be written. Also, some of the deletionist arguments, especially those based on the Terms of Use (m:TOU) and , are without merit, and some deletionist arguments stretch the locality criterion from  beyond the breaking point
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:AUD)

Comment: on deletionist stretching of the locality criterion from  (a section of ): most if not all of the media publishing the sources I considered above—including the majority that I disqualified on various grounds other than , as well as the four I accepted as legitimate—would in my judgment qualify as at least regional, not local.  doesn't really define where "local" ends and "regional" begins, nor does the article section Newspaper#Local or regional to which it links. But as I understand those terms, the reach of television stations affiliated with major networks in the USA or the UK, in particular (even those with "local" in their URLs, as in "abclocal") is such that all of them would qualify as regional; this is especially clear for those that serve major metropolitan areas. Similarly, a major USA metropolitan newspaper like the ''The Philadelphia Inquirer|Philadelphia Inquirer'' or the ''The Boston Globe|Boston Globe'' would be regional, not local (and the ''The New York Times|New York Times'' and the ''The Wall Street Journal|Wall Street Journal'' would be national or even international
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUD||WP:CORP||WP:AUD||WP:AUD)