Deletion of DYIK

Comment: per . I disagree with the premises (such as they are) advanced by those !voting keep. Superstig's is pretty much a variation on WP:ITEXISTS, and argues—incorrectly—that this is sufficient to pass our notability guidelines; the same goes, of course, for 'per astig'. There's a slightly curious 'Keep Tony A.', and I have no idea how to pass that as either an argument, or indeed, an |argument to avoid. Neutralhomer does admittedly challenge SpportingFlyer, but this challenge is based on an as-yet unresolved RfC, so of less value, unfortunately, right now, as it might be in future discussions. SBKSSP—the article's creator—argues in support of two already less that effectual arguments.{{pb}}For the record, there has been little to no independent, third party coverage of the station in reliable sources, either https://www.google.com/search?q=DYIK+%2B+tanjay&client=firefox-b-d&biw=2159&bih=850&tbm=nws&sxsrf=ALeKk01catsZnql12guncQ-f1Cv-0eFMmw%3A1623870894237&ei=rk3KYKmIDovKgQaUuqmQBw&oq=DYIK+%2B+tanjay&gs_l=psy-ab.3...2206.2972.0.3316.2.2.0.0.0.0.76.148.2.2.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..0.0.0....0.n12WvELGCc8 news outlets or https://www.google.com/search?q=DYIK+%2B+tanjay&client=firefox-b-d&tbm=bks&sxsrf=ALeKk03x_rV0_aYxnydposSH2aztok8Osw:1623870898402&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiXm73A7pzxAhWZi1wKHf0eB3QQ_AUoAXoECAIQCw&biw=2159&bih=850&dpr=1.09 literature. While  is often relevant with non-English, non-Western topics, this is sufficiently recent that a solid digital footprint would be expected. There is none. So, the article fails  also. Special:contributions/Serial Number 54129
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:ATADD||WP:OFFLINE||WP:NORG)