Deletion of Self creation cosmology

Comment: to Garthbarber: You seem to have a misunderstanding about WP inclusion criteria. You say we should "wait until the result of the Gravity Probe B geodetic precession is published (April 2007) until deciding". This is totally immaterial. Nowhere in WP policies are we to judge technical merit or base inclusion directly on results of experiments. Your 3rd party reference does seem OK, and seems to establish both notability and secondary sourcing. My main concern is with the fact that by you presenting the work here essentially exclusively, it constitutes |original work, and to some extent |vanity, which are frowned upon, though are not absolute barriers to acceptability. |Neutrality also becomes an issue, in principle, when the inventor is the sole author of the article. It would have been so much better from WP's perspective if a colleague could have presented the work, with you providing critique and correcting errors
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:VAIN||WP:NPOV)