Deletion of Daniel Gade

Comment: I am inclined to agree with the notion that major party candidates for US Senate races should have articles in general. While the  policy does not directly apply, I do believe that deleting the non-incumbent major party candidate runs while giving full coverage with a biography of the incumbent runs against the spirit of that policy. When Wikipedia covers elections, there should be fair representation to both sides of the election. The caveat is that coverage is contingent on the core  and  policies being met, and there needs to be enough sourcing () for a full article. In this case, there is a wide amount of media articles, so I don't see that as an issue here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:GNG)