Deletion of Brizzly (2nd nomination)

Comment: This is one of the numerous Twitter apps released everyday but was noticed and taken over by AOL and then killed off. Technology companies tends to receive a lot more coverage than others precisely because sources like techcrunch, mashable, gizmodo and numerous others specifically focus on it(which probably contributes to the  on Wikipedia). Which is why it is important to see stuff in perspective. If you look at the sources, the app received a lot of initial publicity in 2009 when it was launched and later in 2010 when it was acquired by AOL. The next bit of news coverage it received was when AOL killed it off. (Some of the coverage btw deals more with the company not with the app; this article btw is solely about the app not the company). If we do the , is this app really significant in the grand scheme of things? For an app with such a short lifespan and whose sole claim of significance is that it was an app for Twitter, I would like a sentence of two of this to remain in the encyclopaedia, but there isn't enough for a page solely for itself (See ). A mention at a it of Twitter services helps to improve that page. I would suggest a redirect and selective merge to List of Twitter services and applications
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:SYSTEMICBIAS||WP:10YT||WP:PAGEDECIDE)