Deletion of Rosemarie Allen

Comment: She appears very far from passing any  criterion, especially not #C1 https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=olDsSO4AAAAJ. And the article is puffed up with minor accomplishments and bad sources and should be trimmed to what can be found only in better sources. But two of the 21 sources listed in the article as nominated actually look to be in-depth, reliable, and independent: https://www.essence.com/in-her-we-trust/she-the-people-dr-rosemarie-allen-is-an-education-expert-who-wants-to-end-classroom-bias/ Essence and https://co.chalkbeat.org/2016/3/22/21092529/suspended-countless-times-as-a-child-this-professor-is-tackling-racial-disparities-in-preschool-disc Chalkbeat. So I think she scrapes out a pass of  instead
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: There is absolutely no sign of  whatsoever.  But I take the Essence profile quite seriously as significant independent coverage.  The in-depth Chalkbeat interview (a regional magazine), supported by local coverage, brings me to a weak keep.  The article needs quite a bit of work for style and  issues, but as usual, 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:PROMO||WP:DINC)