Deletion of American-led intervention in Iraq

Comment: This article was proposed  to be merged, then CSD'd and now an AFd. {{U|DocumentError}} dragged me to Ani and false accusations of |Canvassing. I made this article to help slim down the parent article which covers both conflicts. Not bypass Full protection
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVASS)

Comment: Article was proposed https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2014_military_intervention_against_ISIS&diff=627322201&oldid=627321734 before temporary semi-protection was https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2014_military_intervention_against_ISIS&diff=627373409&oldid=627367180 instated on 2014 military intervention against ISIS. Article does not meet  definition, but is rather clearly a . Consensus clearly existed for an article focusing on the Iraqi theater of this notable, significant, and complex conflict, as evidenced on Talk:2014 military intervention against ISIS in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2014_military_intervention_against_ISIS#An_article_for_intervention_in_Iraq.3F this thread and Talk:American-led intervention in Syria in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:American-led_intervention_in_Syria#Remove_the_word_.22coalition.22_from_the_title.3F this thread. Nominator's objections are rooted in a discussion that has little to nothing to do with the manner of the article's creation and is being addressed through more appropriate channels already, via Talk:American-led intervention in Iraq#Systemic_Bias. Nominator has hereto failed to raise objections, whether policy-based or entirely subjective, to the content that exists on American-led intervention in Iraq and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:American-led_intervention_in_Iraq&diff=627624703&oldid=627624689 made clear his belief that a new article title would be a "good compromise" in his eyes. In conclusion, the evidence does not support nominator's contention that this article was created improperly, and other avenues exist to resolve nominator's objections to the article title and scope
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:SPINOFF)