Deletion of Alternative versions of Deadpool

Comment: I looked through a lot of the sources provided by both Andrew and Darkknight2149. I just don't find any of them compelling for notability them though nice 99% (or all) of them are just top lists that very briefly mention the alternative versions. So, I don't think they or the subject passes the in-depth coverage clause to the notability guidelines. I'd be willing to change my opinion if there was a serious article about the alternatives though. It's highly possible one of the sources was, but that I just missed it. Although, it would take more then one to pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Per TTN. ing with countless clickbait articles is not enough to turn trivial mentions into significant discussion of Deadpool's alternate versions. It's hard to imagine a circumstance in which alternate versions of a character merit an entirely separate article and cannot be mentioned in the article of that character
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:REFBOMB)