Deletion of Theodicy and the Bible

Comment: Number of citations is not justification for keeping what appears to be . There is a perfectly serviceable wikipedia entry on theodicy. The article itself appears to be a lengthy and rambling mess written more like a lengthy sermon. This also reminds me of what we used to call in high school debate a "spread." Throw out so much stuff it becomes impossible to refute the entire thing due to the sheer quantity of so-called support
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)