Deletion of Racial disappearance

Comment: The nominator's rationale sums the situation pretty well.  It may be possible to write an encyclopedic article on the subject of the dimunition and disappearance of races due to immigration and miscegenation, but this article is a |FRINGE #ESSAY|ESSAY.  Ordinarily I would argue for keeping the article and re-writing it, but when you remove the non-encylopedic content from this article (as I have done), you are left with nothing but a |NEOLOGISM.  To make a truly clean start you'd have to rename the article, come up with a different definition of its topic, and re-write and source it from the ground up.  There's no foundation to build on; better to delete the article and start from scratch
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:NOT||WP:NEOLOGISM)

Comment: how do you salvage an article with sentences like "Political parties such as the British National Party have stopping racial disappearance as one of their objectives, although since social democracy is a euphemism for totalitarianism, such parties have little chance of gaining significant power, and indeed often face ostracization from the mainstream media and other political parties in their own countries."? I'm all for giving an article a chance but this ought to be speedied, such racist garbage could bring Wikipedia into disrepute.  should apply, if nothing else. Special:Contributions/140.247.249.78|140.247.249.78
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)