Deletion of Reactions to the July 2016 Kabul bombing

Comment: WP:GNG says: If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list.   also prescribes that "notability not temporary".  Per First (perhaps the only) keep vote the page should be dealt with .  I think this is rule position, but I have seen the fate of page Reactions to the 2016 Nice attack + https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Reactions_to_the_2016_Nice_attack/ (1); more importantly the page view statistics and international reactions with huge difference itself speak for humanitarianism and dual standard for terrorism. So with this academic background I stand neutral at this PROD
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP||WP:DUE)