Deletion of Star Trek versus Star Wars (4th nomination)

Comment: The Salon article is an editorial and is already mentioned in the article, along with a heaping helping of |original research about fan reaction to the article. The Tribune and the Inquirer articles are the same article, which is mostly interviews with fans.  I'm still looking around for the full text of the L.A. Daily News articles, but the blurb in the link screams "news of the weird".  I don't see how an article can be built from these sources.  As for trimming OR, if you remove the OR from this article, there won't be anything left
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: As much as I enjoyed such debate in my younger days, the result of this article can't be anything but |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: As with any |synthesis article, notability of the concept being synthesised into a topic must be demonstrated by referencing independent sources ''that have ALREADY made the synthesis''. Without such third party referencing this article is fails both NOR as well as notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)