Deletion of Hai-Sha Ni

Comment: Dr. Ni is a controversial figure, so having an unsourced or poorly-sourced article about him is a violation of . An article |verifiable by reference to |multiple instances of non-trivial coverage in |reliable sources ''could'' be written about Dr. Ni, as demonstrated by Google searches above. However, the page as it stands is ''not'' such an article, and we lose absolutely nothing by deleting it. My vote changes to keep if the article is improved to the extent that most statements have inline citations to newspapers (either English newspapers or Chinese newspapers are fine
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:LIVING||WP:V||WP:N||WP:RS)