Deletion of Stephan Kinsella (4th Nomination)

Comment: The applicable guideline appears to be . From what is on the page, I don't see any evidence that he passes any of the criteria in . DCM's comment above points to publications that are the strongest claim to notability:  Editorship of legal texts published by Oxford University Press (http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/9780379215229.do#.UW6p56LqnHQ 1, http://web.archive.org/web/20050205234822/http://www.oceanalaw.com/main_product_details.asp?ID=293 2, http://web.archive.org/web/20121023232305/http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Law/ContractandGeneralCommercialLaw/ElectronicCommerce/?view=usa&ci=9780379215199 3, http://web.archive.org/web/20070219083421/http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Law/IntellectualProperty/IntellectualProperty/?view=usa&ci=9780379012699 4, http://web.archive.org/web/20070219081545/http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Law/ContractandGeneralCommercialLaw/?view=usa&ci=9780379010008 5). However, these are not enough to establish notability under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:ACADEMIC)