Deletion of Qi (programming language) (2nd nomination)

Comment: The main source for this language, "Functional Programming in Qi" by Tarver, has only been cited once according to Google scholar, by Tarver himself (http://lac.linuxaudio.org/2011/download/Kjetil_Matheussen_PoingImperatif.pdf the other cite listed by GS appears to be a false positive). I also found a trivial mention in the preface of ECOOP'08. That is enough to convince me that this language has not yet had a chance to make a significant impact in theory or in practice, and that the multiple third-party sources with nontrivial coverage required by  do not exist. No prejudice against recreation in some future date when this language becomes significantly more popular
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)