Deletion of 2010 Barack Obama visit to India

Comment: Disclaimer--I'm the author of hte article.  As stated in the article's lead, during hte trip Obama addressed a joint session of the Indian Parliament, which I believe is the 4th time that's happened since 2000.  He publicly endorsed India to be a permanent member of the UN Security Council.   does not apply, as this is not 'routine'.  But beyond that, I'll go straight to the meat of the reason--I can'f possibly see how someone could say 2011 royal tour of Canada (currently on it's way to an overwhelming consensus to keep) is worth an article adn this isn't.  I'm not normally a fan of this kind of argument; I myself supported the deletion of the Royal tour of Canada but opposed referring to the deletion of Barack Obama's visit to India as an argument.  However, I the difference in notability between the two events is very stark in my eyes.  Also, in the deletion discussion of the royal tour, several editors expressed support of an article on Obama's visit to India.  Thus, I think it's possible that Wikipedia:Consensus can change|consensus has changed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)