Deletion of John Schlossberg (3rd nomination)

Comment: as |Notability is not inherited, expanding on my https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2014_February_23&diff=prev&oldid=597300197 DRV argument.  When a subject's perceived "notability" is evaluated, there is broad precedent in this project that if it stems from a famous relative, i.e. the subject would likely not receive the amount of coverage he/she does absent the famous relation, then that is not suited for a standalone article.  Much the same as a  (1E is not being argued her,e just used as a reference) case is considered; absent the event, is that person still notable?  We have evaluated similar cases in the past such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Gore III (8th nomination)|Al Gore's son (it took awhile to stick), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcus Bachmann|Michelle Bachmann's husband, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicky Diaz|Meg Whitman's housekeeper.  Any argument of "it just meets the GNG" should be weighed next-to-nothing in the final tally here, just as they would be in BLP1e discussion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:BLP1E)