Deletion of Tavi Gevinson

Comment: I also don't think that a valid reason for deletion was given. Wikipedia is |not censored and the article seems to pass all key requirements of . It's relatively well-sourced, doesn't contain any defamatory information, and whatever basic personal facts it contains, they have already been published by several major news sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCENSORED||WP:BLP)