Deletion of List of Comics Journal interview subjects

Comment: First, to the person who's accusing me of colluding with Harlan Ellison, rest assured that I have no knowledge of said suit. The lawsuit or lack of same has nothing to do with this nomination and the notion that a lawsuit could somehow be influenced by the existence or non-existence of a list of interview subjects is ludicrous. Second, I have explained the reason for the nomination, which is that #DIR|Wikipedia is not a directory. That a number of people were interviewed by the same publication does not create the sort of association that would warrant an article. Compliance with , which is a guideline and not policy, is irrelevant if the list itself fails , which is policy. Third, |It's useful is an incredibly poor reason for keeping an article. All sorts of things that all sorts of people find useful get deleted off Wikipedia every day. Finally,  is also a horrible reason for keeping an article. If other articles which don't meet Wikipedia policy and guidelines exist, then the proper response to them is to deleted them, not to point to them in an attempt to save other non-compliant articles
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:LIST||WP:NOT||WP:USEFUL||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)