Deletion of Gary C. Ross

Comment: per nomination. Obviously there is some useful information which can be included elsewhere - if it hasn't already (like at Don't ask, don't tell per the suggestions above). Otherwise the subject doesn't appear to be notable per  (lacks "significant" coverage in independent |reliable sources). Likewise fails  and  as far as I can see. I'm also concerned about the |COI and advocacy aspects the article seems to present (is Wikipedia being used here as a forum to question the validity of an administrative decision, i.e. his non-promotion and discharge for instance?) Overall, a fairly junior officer with a relatively average / normal / undistinguished career that seems little different from all the others who have trodden the same path (setting aside the LGBT issues which as I said should be addressed elsewhere - but even then only briefly so as not to breach 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:SOLDIER||WP:AUTHOR||WP:COI||WP:UNDUE)