Deletion of SolidFire (2nd nomination)

Comment: There exists some reliable sources in the article and Northamerica1000 has pointed out multiple reliable sources with content that is clearly more than just regurgitated primary sources. With multiple RS, the topic has been shown to be notable per . Any promotional or non-neutrality issues can be better solved through editing, not deletion. Hence, keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Meets . Source ''examples'' include, ''but are not limited to'': http://www.techrepublic.com/article/solidfire-acquisition-breathes-new-life-into-netapp/, http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/12/15/solidfire_a_contrary_view/, http://www.networkworld.com/article/2952721/cloud-computing/11-deploys-solidfires-storage-for-its-new-cloud-servers.html, http://www.cio.com/article/3078659/netapps-new-solidfire-software-option-is-buy-once-use-anywhere.html, http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/09/01/netapp_founder_dave_hitz_says_solidfire_is_for_people_who_fking_hate_storage/, http://www.zdnet.com/article/netapp-solidfire-offers-flexible-purchasing-model-for-datacenter-storage/, http://www.computerweekly.com/blog/Quocirca-Insights/NetApp-SolidFire-a-new-powerhouse-or-straws-grasping-at-each-other, http://blogs.wsj.com/venturecapital/2014/10/07/solidfire-raises-82-million-for-pooled-storage-on-flash-memory/, http://venturebeat.com/2015/12/21/netapp-acquires-flash-storage-vendor-solidfire-for-870m/, and https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22SolidFire%22#q=%22SolidFire%22&tbm=nws more coverage in bylined news articles written by staff writers that have been published in independent, wp:rs|reliable sources. Concerns about tone in the article can be addressed by |copy editing it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:COPYEDIT)