Deletion of Institute of Inspection Cleaning and Restoration Certification (IICRC)

Comment: After a quick search I found a few compelling articles. It seems that being "IICRC certified" is a well known certification. Take a look http://interact.stltoday.com/pr/business/PR031413110312190 here, it mentions "Amant’s technicians are IICRC certified".http://www.marketwatch.com/story/paul-davis-provides-spring-storm-safety-tips-2013-03-26 This as well states "Qualified technicians are certified from The Institute of Inspection, Cleaning and Restoration Certification (IICRC)." https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&q=IICRC&oq=IICRC&gs_l=news-cc.3..43j43i53.2618.4166.0.4361.8.6.0.2.0.0.170.502.3j2.5.0...0.0...1ac.1.gvZYC3__BRs Here's where I found it, take a look for yourself. What are your thoughts on that? I think, seeing what I found, this article should be kept and certainly cleaned up/made more encyclopedic . Hmm,  says "Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability", so perhaps not, but the context of it makes it sound to me as though it's reputable in the world of cleaning. What do you think with what I've given? I'm actually quite stumped on this one, I want to see what some other peoples' input (which of course is why we're here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)