Deletion of Society for Venturism

Comment: The above keep !votes do not establish why the article ought not to be deleted.  First, the sources on the article really aren't reliable.  Yahoo posts about Toronto's Bedford Day parties and wikis, postings, and articles from affiliates of this organization are not considered |in line with WP policy.  As for the argument stating that an appropriate analogy is the Catholic Church article being sourced by other denominations' webpages, these, too, would not be considered reliable.  Basically, this article needs sources from a well-established source not affiliated with the Society of Venturism or its affiliates in the cryonics movement, and clear indications that the topic has garnered sufficient notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: This appears to be pure ; the sources appear to be entirely within that fringe world, and the keep reasons appear to be  even where lack of  is accepted. It is difficult to see how anything other than delete could reasonably result under WP policy, though perhaps a merge to Cryonics would work
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:ITSUSEFUL||WP:NOTABILITY)