Deletion of Democrat Party (phrase)

Comment: This article is very well-sourced and I'm a bit surprised to see such an extensive and well-sourced article proposed for deletion.  Some of the sources are written specifically about this topic (as in written about the phrase/term itself).  That certainly meets the otability criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: edit conflict) simply because a valid reason for deletion has not been given. "Absolute nonsense" doesn't apply, as it's not gibberish, it's a coherently written article.  The reference to Dubya really falls under  and is an invalid argument.  Note also that a Google search, while not conclusive proof of anything, does return 900,000+ hits for http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22democrat%20party%22 "democrat party".  Based on some of those hits, the focus of the article should be changed to include a non-US point of view as well. &mdash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)