Deletion of The Best of Times (TV pilot)

Comment: there is three independent reviews that show notability for gng, as they are not just statements but full reviews. The comment that ''The only reason this got newspaper coverage, in turn, was to fill space on a newspaper's television page'' is one of the daftest arguments I have ever heard! That would mean all TV reviews are rubbish and could not be used as notability, which would then mean most TV programs would not be on wikipedia. I also argue the case for ; 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPAPER||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: Your statement of "one day of coverage isn't significant" is ludicrous.  How many Made for TV films have articles and the film was only shown once?  Those films usually only have "one day of coverage" too.  Should they be eliminated?  How about films released direct to video?  They are reviewed when released and then never mentioned again, thereby qualifying for your "one day of coverage".  Should they be eliminated?  No.  "One day of coverage" isn't mentioned anywhere.  The '''number''' of significant reviews qualifies something for notability...and this TV pilot meets that coverage.  This is definitely a prime example of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)