Deletion of The Freechild Project

Comment: The sourcing of this article is beyond merely suspect, it is clearly stretched to inflate claims of significance.  As an example, ''The Freechild Project has also been cited for making theoretical contributions to the field of youth service5 and youth participation.6'' is backed up by 5: an undergraduate term paper that cites the Freechild project to help determine a framework for the rest of the paper: it's not an important point in the paper, it's certainly not a paper about the Freechild project, and ''it's just a term paper'' anyway: not at all a reliable published source.  And 6 is not much better: it is a reliable source but it doesn't attribute any such thing as "theoretical contributions" to the Freechild project, rather, it's a source about how to foster youth participation in social activities in Halifax and mentions the Freechild Project.  This problem is endemic in the article.  Normally, I might say that the article should be edited to reflect the sources more accurately, but after examining the sources I am still unconvinced that the Freechild Project is really notable, and more importantly, the article has been written to promote it, in violation of  and  (soapbox
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:NOT)