Deletion of Bootstrap paradox in fiction (2nd nomination)

Comment: Bootstrap paradox.  Is it bothersome to anyone else that Bootstrap paradox still has an  tag on it?  I have no problems with comprehensiveness as mentioned by DGG above, and agree that the use of this concept has occurred often.  But there is a fine line between comprehensive and |indiscriminate collections of information.  Because nearly all of the examples are unsourced, that Bootstrap_paradox#Definition|definition section of the main article on the bootstrap paradox is currently unsourced, and unsurprisingly, that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bootstrap_paradox there has also been disagreement on the inclusion criteria on talk page for Bootstrap paradox, the current article ''also'' feels too much like |original research
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:OR)