Deletion of Mohammed sanduk

Comment: The subject is a physicist and the article makes at least 2 claims to notability that, if true, would represent remarkable advances in this science: (1) an extension of the theory of Bohm diffusion, and (2) an extension of the Wave–particle duality|wave model of a particle. The source provided for the first claim is an obscure journal and this paper appears in none of the usual mainstream indexing services, e.g. WoS and GS. (Long parenthetical remark: this paper was also added as reference for Bohm diffusion in that article by an anonymous editor Special:Contributions/86.2.247.35|IP 82.2.247.35 in Guildford, the subject's hometown, and an apparently  account, Special:Contributions/86.2.254.132|IP 86.2.254.132 also from Guildford, has also edited only this article and the Bohm diffusion article. If the Sanduk article is eventually deleted, the reference should be removed from the Bohm diffusion article, as it is apparently not recognized by mainstream physicists.) There are 2 sources for the second claim: and article in Apeiron (physics journal)|Apeiron and an uploaded paper in arXiv. Apeiron is a well-known "alternative science" journal and is not regarded as part of the mainstream science world, for example it is not indexed by WoS. The arXiv:0904.0790|arxiv source, though more credible, is still not a peer-reviewed contribution. It's been uploaded there for about a year and there's no indication in the article that this paper has been submitted to a mainstream physics journal. On balance, there's no indication whatsoever that the physics community has embraced either of these two ideas. In terms of a more routine check, WoS shows 1 paper with 9 citations from 1992 (h-index = 1). This appears to be something related to what the article says was his PhD topic 20 years ago. It does not appear that he is a notable physicist in the least. Respectfully
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)