Deletion of Vector (physical)

Comment: This is not a content fork in that Vector (spatial) is mainly a mathematical treatment while this article proposes a treatment from the standpoint of physics/engineering, which, from the outline section headings, seems to be quite different.  The competing article Vector (spatial) seems to explain the topic poorly and, for example, has almost no inline citations to support its detailed content.  It also seems to be too much of a #HOWTO|how to.  We have a variety of even worse articles such as Coordinate vector (which has no sources at all) and so the contention that this subject must be covered within a single article seems overdone.  There is some contention within the talk page for Vector (spatial) as to the best name for the article and this further supports the idea that other article titles and treatments are worth trying
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)