Deletion of Adam C. Winfield

Comment: The most important thing missing from  is ''wikipedia should not be a hagiography''.  Of course Winn is innocent until proven guilty.  And, after drafting articles on more than a million individuals I think we should be pretty experienced how to draft a neutrally written article about individuals who face charges, without implying their guilt is a proven fact.  Actually, I think the effect of suppressing our neutrally written, properly referenced, non-sensational articles, is directly counter the spirit of BLP, because it leaves our reader to rely on press coverage that is often not neutral, and is written from a sensational point of view
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)