Deletion of RG Premium

Comment: My initial thought on this was to Keep it because the rationale given in the nomination are largely reasons to improve the article not delete it.  However the acid test is whether there are  which talk about this particular guitar.  My searches have failed to find anything. The first few pages of Google results are sites which sell the guitar, or user-submitted stuff or items which are obviously regurgitated press releases and therefore not independent. Google books and scholar results aren't any more enlightening
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)