Deletion of Ignacio Anaya

Comment: There is clearly a lot of GNG from strong  re this subject, not just from his being the subject of a Google Doodle (''The Independent'' https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/ignacio-anaya-garcia-google-doodle-nachos-who-profile-124-birthday-mexico-city-a9060801.html, ''USA Today'' https://eu.usatoday.com/story/tech/2019/08/15/google-doodle-nachos-inventor-ignacio-anaya-garcia-honored/2015881001/, ''Fortune (magazine)'' https://fortune.com/2019/08/15/ignacio-anaya-garcia-nachos-google-doodle/, ''Time (magazine)'' https://time.com/5652911/google-doodle-nachos-ignacio-anaya-garcia/; there are lots more), but even before that, he has been given a section in several notable books on food as the creator of the nachos (I added a reference from the ''Oxford Companion to American Food and Drink'' (he gets two pages), and another notable book on US food by a notable author, Josh Chetwynd; again, I could have added several more books), and other RS, such as ''Huffington Post'' from 2012 https://www.huffpost.com/entry/nachos-inventor_n_1515233, that pre-date his appearing on Google Doodle.  does not ''exclude'' a subject from being a BLP; it sets the conditions under which a BIO1E can be a BLP, and says: {{tq|On the other hand, if an event is of sufficient importance, even relatively minor participants may require their own articles}}.  Inventing Nachos is notable (even Google recognise it), and he is the recognised inventor
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BIO1E)