Deletion of United Express Flight 3411

Comment: for now), per .  The work (making the article) is done.  It may become a noteworthy event, or it might join the leggings incident.  Either way, per , it should be left until such time it is determined what the full impact of the incident is.  If, at that time, it qualifies for and is voted to be deleted per , then the paragraph on UA's page will retain the noteworthy information.  If it grows into a larger incident (or series of incidents), it may need to be moved to an appropriately titled page (such as a court case, etc).  But, as stated, per , '''strong keep'''.  Special:Contributions/173.227.169.66|173.227.169.66
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID||WP:RAPID||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:RAPID)

Comment: A lot of the arguments above and poor and not based in policy but overall I have to lean towards keep. Public relations damage and financial implications do appear to be materialising which gives this some lasting significance.  actually states '''As Wikipedia is not a paper source, editors are encouraged to include current and up-to-date information within its coverage, and to develop stand-alone articles on significant current events'''.  discourages "routine news reporting on things like announcements, sports, or celebrities" - not major controversies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Some obvious and legitimate  concerns here, but at this point, this story has met pretty much any notability guideline we have
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM)