Deletion of Bernard Lewinsky

Comment: Unless the event in question was his meeting , then  doesn't apply. Simply put, the man would be notable even without his relation to Monica
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: he easily passes |the Prof test as a top 15 % doctor, owner of a major clinic, ''h''-index over 10, etc., based on |literally hundreds of precedents.  Neither does  prevent inclusion of notable relatives.  As noted above, |significant coverage in numerous sources creates a |presumption of notability, which must be rebutted by the preponderence of the evidence.  This has not been done
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:OUTCOMES||WP:INHERITED||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG)

Comment: At some point, the quacking of the duck needs to be noted as belonging to a duck. That, and--as Protonk mentions-- concerns, as well as the fact that a merge and redirect (which I would have otherwise recommened) is unavailable, given the editing behavior at the article, lead me to this recommendation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:NPF)