Deletion of Chris Darwin

Comment: I fully agree that notability is not inherited.  But in this case it appears Chris Darwin has leveraged his ancestry and gone out to establish a name for himself with significant coverage in reliable sources such as:  http://www.smh.com.au/environment/a-natural-selection-regret-turns-to-blooming-marvel-for-darwin-20090829-f3em.html http://www.news.com.au/evolutionist-charles-darwins-grandson-says-its-okay-to-teach-children-creationism/story-e6frep2f-1225887513882?from=public_rss http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/04/22/1050777257295.html http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4082078.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4607037.stm.  I think this is enough to pass  - but I also agree that the article is very poorly written and needs substantial trimming to focus it down to what is cited from reliable sources and is actually notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:NOTINHERITED seems especially apropos here.  is probably the closest subject-specific guideline, but the sources do not seem to support that or the |general notability guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG)