Deletion of Queer coding

Comment: the subject meets  per significant independent coverage in a basic  search (e.g. https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_A_Z_of_Gender_and_Sexuality/44F2DwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Queer+coding%22+-wikipedia&pg=PA212&printsec=frontcover https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Intersectionality_of_Critical_Animal/NsUpDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Queer+coding%22+-wikipedia&pg=PA120&printsec=frontcover https://dialogues.rutgers.edu/images/Journals_PDF/2017-18-dialogues-web_e6db3.pdf#page=164 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13110/marvelstales.29.1.0110). This article needs to be improved and better sources need to be added, but AFD is . An article on a notable topic should not be deleted just because the article is poorly written
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE||WP:NOTCLEANUP)