Deletion of Halfling (Dungeons & Dragons)

Comment: to Halfling - I initially was going to suggest a selective merge, per Hog Farm, as I felt that the existence of the D&D Halflings and the legal issues regarding how they came about their names was worth a mention there.  But, I see that it already ''is'', and as there is nothing else in the article except for primary-sourced game info, I don't really see much else that would really need to be merged.  At the very least, this is an unnecessary , I would say.  A Redirect would leave its history intact, in the case that others felt that there was other information worth merging
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Splitting (WP:SPLIT)

Comment: to Halfling.  The topic of halflings as a whole is probably notable to some extent, and the D&D halflings would be part of that subject.  However, the amount of detail in the entire article would be .  A trimmed version should be merged, though
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)