Deletion of Nina Power

Comment: there is really much less here than meets the eye, and this person does not meet PROF, BIO, or GNG.  I would urge close inspection of the keep votes above: one says "per Sandstein", but Sandstein does not recommend keep; another merely addresses the question of whether harassment should be considered but does not provide evidence of notability.  Agricola44 has offered the most insightful analysis of her record.  Even if this AfD looks like "no consensus", please consider closing it per  -- in the presence of a request by the subject, no consensus may be closed with deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:BIODEL)

Comment: Agricola44 has it, I think. With all due respect to the subject notability is borderline at best - and her request tips the scales toward deletion, as per doing no harm. That said, as per , if the subject becomes more notable down the line - a high-profile publication or some other project that gets widespread coverage, for example - an article might be warranted. The more notable the subject is, generally the more likely it is that their article would be kept, all requests from the subject notwithstanding - and the subject should be aware of that possibility. The only way to ensure that no article will ever be written about you would be to go do something obscure. High-profile scholarship is not that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Usual caveats (WP:USUAL)