Deletion of The Economist editorial stance

Comment: see .  The Economist's editorial policy is actually quite significant in its own way, and it is easily verifiable.  '''One example''': ''just last night'', I was reading Michael Brook's "13 Things That Don't Make Sense" (ISBN 978-1-60751-666-8), which had arrived fresh fromn the Quality Paperback Book Club as a featured special.  There is a full paragraph on page 67 in that book merely about the magazine's support for cold fusion experiments and the philosophy of science, with a quote and an analysis of the same.  You can rename, merge, whatever, but don't delete it, because it is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)