Deletion of July 2009 cyber attacks

Comment: I think creation of this page was premature and violates .  Although it may turn out that these attacks are notable in the long-run, it's too early to know this and I see no evidence of |notability yet.  What is lost by waiting a few months before writing an article?  What if there are more attacks in August?  In September?  Then the title and organization of this topic will be inaccurate.  I also find no evidence that these attacks are notable ''as a topic in and of themselves''.  There has been pretty much steady coverage of a variety of cyber attacks over the past several years and I have seen nothing that makes this particular one stand out.  See this search: http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22cyber+attacks%22&cf=all.  Also, searching in google for the phrase "July 2009 cyber attacks" on google yields only hits that are mirroring or referencing this article.  Also see this search: http://news.google.com/news?pz=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22july+2009%22+cyber+attack.  The coverage is all within a 3 day time-window.  Someone jumped the gun here and I say to delete both because I see no evidence of notability as a topic in and of itself, and also in order to discourage this sort of activity in the future
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:N)