Deletion of Samanta Institute of Science and Technology

Comment: As anyone would notice, there are several "deletes" above that are accounts or IPs with few edits. And as anyone would notice, there is a {{tl|not a ballot}} note at the top of the page. I am not saying that accounts with few edits should be excluded from participation here. But the real problem is that this article is being judged negatively based on the way it appeared when it was initially proposed for deletion, which is radically different from the originial version, and based on the fact it has been edited by many SPAs. The nom even stated inaccurately that it was created by an SPA. The reality is that I, a veteran editor, created the article after seeing a segment about it on the news, and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Samanta_Institute_of_Science_and_Technology&oldid=367134208 this is my original version. It contained plenty of sources, enough to meet the |general notability guideline. Many of those |links have rotted since, but LINKROT is not a reason for deletion. I have not really paid much attention to editing of this article since then, and I have actually edited Wikipedia very little in the past several months
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:LINKROT)