Deletion of Windows Odyssey (2nd nomination)

Comment: Puppets are dealt with by blocking. Article issues are dealt with through editing. Having giving thought to the comments here, the |potential this article has for |improvement, and in consideration of a brief serach http://www.google.com/search?q=Windows+Odyssey&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.microsoft:en-US&ie=utf8&oe=utf8, http://books.google.com/books?um=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Windows%20Odyssey%22&sa=N&tab=np, http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Windows+Odyssey%22&sa=X&oi=print_back, I have struck my "merge" up above.  Now the the article belongs to Wikipedia, I believe it can be improved through |regular editing. With respects, the GNG is a guideline, used by default when it seems applicable, but it will not and does not apply to all subjects.  The notability of an idea or concept is not judged by the same criteria as notability for an person or a film.  Further research in archives and technical journals not available online would be reasonable and prudent. Surmountable issues are never proper cause for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state (WP:POTENTIAL||WP:IMPROVE||WP:ATD)