Deletion of Erika Grey

Comment: mdash; fails . Coverage in sources is mostly either trivial, incidental, or one-event. Body of work is https://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&page=1&rh=n%3A283155%2Cp_27%3APedante%20Press obviously self-published and not critically cited.  Similarly fails  due to lack of extensive, significant coverage.  Pretty much at best, as far as attempting to establish expertise, we would have http://www.coasttocoastam.com/guest/grey-erika/85170, which is solely due to a single appearance (Coast to Coast AM, a show that basically also gives random appearances to the Ancient Aliens/tinfoil-hat/pseudoscience crowd) and is probably de facto a self-published media-release biography.  She's admittedly covered in exactly 3 news articles (http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/donald-trump-is-probably-one-of-the-biggest-things-to-happen-to-end-times-bible-prophecy/ http://www.newyorker.com/culture/on-and-off-the-avenue/the-literal-stink-of-the-trump-apocalypse and http://www.christianpost.com/news/is-donald-trump-the-last-trump-before-jesus-christs-return-173779/) that all popped up at the same time (inauguration), which even more seems to reflect the coverage as, at best,  (i.e., "you'll never guess what ''some'' people are saying about Trump
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG||WP:BIO1E)