Deletion of Heenal Raichura (2nd nomination)

Comment: I stand by what I said last time. It's not whether we being the youngest doctor ever should be considered notable, it's whether independent reliable third-party sources found it notable enough to write about it. I disagree that we should be dogmatically disregarding the coverage because of  - she is not an event, and she remained the youngest doctor for two years after the initial coverage died down. In any case, there has been subsequent coverage and awards since she became the youngest doctor on an international scale, so I think it's sustained and widespread enough to qualify for event coverage. One alternative might be to merge all these youngest doctors into, say, Youngest doctor in the UK (I think the information in this article is mergeable), but I disagree that this should face outright deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)