Deletion of Three.js (2nd nomination)

Comment: There are books devoted to the topic, such as http://books.google.com/books?id=6TVeAQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Three.js&hl=en&sa=X&ei=i7ZBU-j-BaHNsQTgqoKgDg&ved=0CDUQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Three.js&f=false Learning Three.js: The JavaScript 3D Library for WebGL and http://books.google.com/books?id=HY6kAQAAQBAJ&pg=PT179&dq=Three.js&hl=en&sa=X&ei=i7ZBU-j-BaHNsQTgqoKgDg&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=Three.js&f=false Game Development with Three.js and books which use the lib extensively throughout the text, such as http://books.google.com/books?id=uYnyaBClb3IC&pg=PA19&dq=Three.js&hl=en&sa=X&ei=i7ZBU-j-BaHNsQTgqoKgDg&ved=0CEEQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=Three.js&f=false WebGL: Up and Running. The first two books are published by Packt and the third is published by O'Reilly, both reputable publishers. The article lists other books in the Bibliography, but I have not checked those. There are enough multiple in-depth RS to pass notability. The article itself is somewhat promotional, for instance, the "Selected Uses and Works" section is basically an ad for how widely it is used and could be cut back to just notable entries (those with WP articles themselves) and a couple of examples. But removing promotional content is a surmountable problem, per, ; there is no need to blow it up per . A notable topic and surmountable problems suggests keeping the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:SURMOUNTABLE||WP:TNT)