Deletion of Veracity of statements by Donald Trump (2nd nomination)

Comment: Political" is fine; POV is not. Do you see a  violation? If so, where? Anyhow, there's nothing stopping you from making "Veracity of statements by other president" articles, as long as they're notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: This reads like potentially  and . Obviously there's plenty of documentation for false statements made by Trump, but this article risks ballooning into an indiscriminate list of content that is only loosely related, which is something that is proscribed by  and can be explained more at . It's easy to see why people may mistakenly believe that this article should be kept since it is obviously well sourced and the general topic is notable, but having it as a standalone article (rather than as a subsection of Donald Trump or a subsection of the topics he is talking about) is not really encyclopedic. (And of course you can find a lot of news articles about Trump being dishonest, but that isn't enough to justify an article. Much has been said about 'Honest' Abe Lincoln but no one would suggest putting together an article Veracity of statements made by Abraham Lincoln. Much has been said about Beyonce's talent but that won't be enough to save Beyonce listography. It's not enough to accumulate sources that touch on an article in general terms
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH||WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:LISTCRUFT)

Comment: Article clearly passes . I don't see a need re-creating this delete discussion after the way the first one ended
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)