Deletion of Sloppy seconds (sexual practice)

Comment: Satisfies . Also not a neologism, unless it's still considered "relatively new" after https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=sloppy+seconds&case_insensitive=on&year_start=1950&year_end=2000 50 years of documented usage in print. —&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)