Deletion of List of emo artists

Comment: Article is a fork of the obviously notable Emo article, has clearly defined criteria (see other similar lists List of pop punk bands, List of J-pop artists) and is based entirely on verfiable sources including MTV, AOL music, Rolling Stone, BBC, NY Times to name a few. It is not OR under any definition. ''Contention'' is a content issue which effects many articles on wikipedia and is not a valid reason for deletion. Categories and lists are not exclusive as defined in guidelines (Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigational templates). I suggest the nominee withdraws the afd as a mistaken nomination as there is no valid #REASON|criteria for deletion given in the nomination and most experienced editors can see the article is obviously notable. --neonwhite
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)

Comment: per 13Tawaazun14. Edit wars are a constant presence on many controversial subjects such as abortion and the Israel-Palestinian conflict. That's not much of a reason to delete an article, particularly since any controversy surrounding a music genre pales significantly in comparison to the more serious subjects like war and politics. Categories and lists are not the same thing and one is not a substitute for the other. There is no reason why both cannot exist for any given topic and other genres do have both a similar list and a category. This list actually has references and as long as it continues to rely on references, it is hard to imagine why there should be any contention if editors abide by the wikipedia policies and guidelines concerning |verifiability, |original research and |reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:RS)

Comment: per item 7 of  and apparent difficulty in maintaining a stable page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LC)