Deletion of George Jackson (conductor) (2nd nomination)

Comment: There are two ways this could pass the criteria for inclusion. (1) the general notability guideline () which requires significant in depth coverage from multiple independent sources. (2) The alternative criteria at . Re (1), the only reference that remotely qualifies is an interview which ORF (broadcaster)|ORF publishes for the (many) recipients of its grants to promising young musicians. None of the rest qualify. Note that the first reference http://www.allesklassik.org/2013/06/a-maestro-is-born-stroke-of-luck-for.html looks like an article about him but it's a PR piece from ''"AllesKlassik-PR&Organisation- Salzburg. Excellent references for classical artists"''. The remainder are all minor festival notices and potted bios (not independent of the the subject). Re (2), the subject fails to pass any of the criteria, e.g. two recordings with a notable classical music label or winning a major prize (none of the ones listed fall remotely into the category) or being the permanent conductor of a major symphony orchestra (or the guest conductor of multiple major symphony orchestras). Some of the ones that the article claims he has conducted are major, but seem to have been conducted not as part of the orchestra's regular concert season but as part of master classes and conducting courses which the subject took. The fact that not a single review can be cited for the major orchestras he claims to have conducted further suggests that. The London Symphony Orchestra is referenced to a broken link and I can find no mention of him on the LSO site
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO)