Deletion of Gengar

Comment: based on the extent of the sourcing, and without doing a , I am not convinced that this article strictly fails  as alleged by the nominator and other editors. In any event, this should have been the subject of a merge discussion as opposed to a deletion discussion since a few editors have proposed that a large swath of the content may in fact be salvageable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG)