Deletion of Bloviate (2nd nomination)

Comment: This world has a rich cultural history and several reliable sources which discuss the word specifically (rather than just using it.) Google news archive shows 616 entries for "bloviate" including  the Rocky Mountain News (1994) calling it "a beautiful verb" in "'BLOVIATE' A DELIGHTFUL, UNDISCOVERED VERB http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=RM&p_theme=rm&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB4DF4356451679&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM." The New York Times discussed its history and application in "Journal; The Bloviators' Ball "(1999)http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C04E5DC153EF935A35752C0A96F958260 and earlier in 1972. Its long absence from dictionaries was discussed in the Boston Globe (April 4, 1999):"The real mystery is why the lexicographers ignored bloviate for so many years. ... Like disconnect, bloviate somehow eluded the radar of most slang ..." If multiple reliable sources have substantial coverage in discussions of the word, it seems to be |notable. Most dictionary words lack such coverage (as opposed to simple usage). (Rather than deletion, perhaps it could be redirected to one of the blowhard radio talkers. I could make a recommendation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)