Deletion of Michael Andrew Roth

Comment: He works in algebraic geometry, which is perhaps the toughest area of pure math in terms of obtaining new results and where people do not publish a lot. I checked MathSciNet and he has 7 papers listed there (which does seem to be a bit low even for algebraic geometry). Two of them are in top-notch journals: one in Inventiones Mathematicaehttp://www.springerlink.com/content/1t5fdhvldupx4nqr/?p=b8ca9c75970e4a8da16287a6ce17a90d&pi=1 and one in Crelle's Journalhttp://www.reference-global.com/doi/abs/10.1515/crll.2004.045 That's very good but, in the absence of additional evidence, not good enough for passing . Citation hits, both in googlescholar and in mathscinet, are pretty low and neither the WP article nor his webpage give any other information (such as honors/awards, journal editorships, etc) that might indicate passing 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)