Deletion of Marion Foster Welch

Comment: nbsp; Wikipedia's notability is defined as being that the topic is "worthy of notice".&nbsp; That's it.&nbsp; The WP:N nutshell explains that notability is understood as that the topic attracts attention from the world at large over a period of time.&nbsp; https://books.google.com/books?id=qfnkcWmDdDQC&lpg=PA100&ots=0FwBdFML0g&dq=%22stephen%20foster%20memorial%22%20welch&pg=PA100#v=onepage&q=%22stephen%20foster%20memorial%22%20welch&f=false This source shows the topic receiving attention in an event with 50,000 people.I had the occasion to read a 2007 version of eletion policy, and it says, "The deletion processes all focus on whether an article meets the criteria for existence on Wikipedia; that is, they are to determine whether it is not original research, its central information is verifiable, and it is capable of achieving a neutral point of view with good editorship."&nbsp; It should be quickly apparent from this 2007 concept as applied to the discussion here to focus on the idea of original research.&nbsp; Is "Marion Foster Welch" the construction of multiple small pieces of evidence that don't quite fit together?&nbsp; I'm not buying it.As for verifiability, does anyone doubt that the scholarship here is sound?&nbsp; I think we are comfortable that this is not a controversial topic that will require attention to keeping a neutral view.&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:D)