Deletion of Open smart grid protocol

Comment: and then merge smart grid, per . LonWorks == OSGP == ESNA == Echelon. There are three smart grid standards at this moment: 1 SGIP-NIST, USA started in 2009 by Obama. Is a truelly open standard activity backed by nearly 800 companies. 2 SG-SC formed by the SG-TFhttp://ec.europa.eu/energy/gas_electricity/smartgrids/taskforce_en.htm by command of the European Union, is backed by severel hunderes of companies. 3 OSGP backed by ESNA an organisation started by Echelon and backed by 8 others including universities. Is a completely private initiative not backed by countries. The number of installed devices mentioned in many publications are all installed in Italy, Italy was the first country that between 1998 and 2005 switched to remote metering because of the fraud that took place. Since LonWorks was not accepted by the European commision as being the future network for Smart Grid a new organisation was started (ESNA) to support the marketing of LonWorks at that time already renamed into OSGP a name that is very similar to SGIP. Its better to start ONE smart grid article that will include all forms of smart grid that are in development. I am a participating member of the SGIP-NIST working group and a member of the SG-SC in Europe. My company tried to become a member of ESNA but this was refused since our business is closely related to Echelon's. For people that do not believe me simply do a WHOIS on www.esna.org and look who is the person who registrated the name in 2005, next check who is in the board of directors of ESNA the Echelon boss ?. Uhmm the same name
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)