Deletion of Nokia 1600 (3rd nomination)

Comment: Merge and redirect''' to List of Nokia products.My initial instinct is to support Shoombooly, my |WikiProject Orphanage partner-in-crime.  However, my friend, I think that your arguments for keeping this article speak more towards the fact that there are a lot of other articles which deserve deletion (see Edison's Caligula quote, above).  Doing a cursory Google search for this phone only reveals the specs for this phone, and not any other reason it's notable.  The Apple remote ''is'' notable, in my opinion, simply because it can be used for so much, and is pretty unique as far as remotes go, in that it is a remote for a PC, which is not a common thing.  But cell phones are common as mud these days, and there doesn't seem to be anything unique about this phone that is not already covered by the cellular phone article.  If you can find something specifically unique about it, then I would switch to keep.  Until then, I would merge all the specs into the Nokia product article.  Sorry, pardner
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Orphan (WP:O)

Comment: No references to show that it satisfies |notability requirements. Simply being a product offered for sale by a large company in no way provides inherent notability. Wikipedia is not a surrogate of the vendor's webpage. If being offered for sale by a large company was sufficient notability to justify an article, then since notability is not temporary, every product '''ever''' offered for sale by a large company would be notable. I would not oppose a redirect to a list of Nokia products, although even such a list will sometimes have questionable notability. Imagine a list of every product ever sold by Sears|Sears Roebuck in the last 115 years
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)