Deletion of Bricemanning

Comment: To anon: it is not our job to prove that this term is worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. It is yours, since you are making the claim. All you have to do is provide a single reliable source per  and I promise to vote for a keep. The problem is that you almost surely can't, and so this is nothing more than a non-notable, non-verifiable neologism that's only used by a few users on a few forums ("narrow scope" per myself before
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)