Deletion of Dream (YouTuber) (2nd nomination)

Comment: per Nsk92 and their additional sources, which show that Dream has gained significant coverage and passes  – and not only since the cheating incident. Special:Contributions/98.35.13.170|98.35.13.170
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT)

Comment: To be honest, I wasn't going to make a comment here one way or the other. However, there are some really poor !votes both for an against keeping this article, and I figured I should probably weigh in with something at least a little substantive. Two hours ago, https://gamerant.com/dream-face-reveal-youtube-dox/ this was published. Some amount of hours before that, HITC wrote https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2021/01/02/dream-doxxed/ this article. A day before that, we had https://gamerant.com/minecraft-youtuber-dream-video-not-cartoon/ this news story, and a week before that there was https://meaww.com/who-is-minecraft-youtuber-dream-days-after-cheating-scandal-records-for-mr-beast-youtube-rewind this.That's some obvious  coverage right there. Mind you; all this guy did was basically go outside and record a video of himself that was less than ten seconds long, but that was enough to get ''four'' different articles written about it.Is there enough content about Dream to make a proper  here? No, and I don't think there ever will be. Dream has stated several times that he wants to keep his IRL identity as private for as long as he can, so even ''if'' a  posted information about where he grew up, his birthday, what his last name is, etc. It would not be responsible for us to publish it per PRIVACY.Secondaly, there is some arguement that coverage of Minecraft Manhunt or his speedruns should not be counted as coverage ''about Dream''. I am sorry, but I just do not buy into that contention. That is all coverage of Dream's Minecraft/YouTube career, and therefore it can be incredibly helpful in filling out this article. The personal life section will probably only end up covering (1) his first name and possibly his family (ie. "Drista" if that gets mentioned in  eventually which it probably will), and (2) the fact Dream keeps most of his personally identifiable information rather private (which has a lot of details to it imo). &#8211
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SUSTAINING||WP:BLP||WP:RS||WP:BLPPRIVACY)

Comment: noting that I was the '''procedural nominator''') - Occasionally an article has very large responses, both for keeping and for deleting, on an |AFD.  There may be at least two explanations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)