Deletion of Bruce Marks

Comment: Our rules for state legislators do not require the person to have completed any specific minimum ''number'' of terms to become notable enough for an article; if he's served in the legislature ''at all'', then he's notable, because state legislators are one of those fields where it's ''extremely'' important, verging on ''mission critical'', for us to be a ''complete'' and ''comprehensive'' reference for ''all'' of them. If there are COI problems here, they can be dealt through the normal editing process. And yes, one of the reasons we ''have'' SNGs like  in the first place, instead of ''just'' having  alone, is precisely ''because'' there can be, and regularly is, a significant difference between the body of sourcing that ''exists'' and the subset of sourcing that ''Wikipedians'' have actually ''found'' and ''used'' (and that's ''especially'' true when a subject served in the 1990s and thus his sourcing might have to be retrieved from ''archived'' media coverage instead of just sitting out on the Google
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: You seem to have misread . This subject easily passes that criterion as he was a state senator
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)