Deletion of James William Middleton

Comment: Although obviously not as well covered in the media as his sister Kate, James has been the subject of a number of articles in reliable news sources and is clearly of public interest. I believe he meets  and therefore !vote for the article to be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: to Middleton family as proposed above (is that really the best title though?). This is textbook |inheritance and |cruft. My bet is that in one year there will be as little if not less to write about him (and reasons to do so), and I would personally choose to get his and other relatives' data into a section at Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, but I don't think an article on her family is inappropriate, and it is a fair compromise between the participants of this AfD
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERIT||WP:CRUFT)

Comment: since he clearly meets the |general notability guideline, in that he has received coverage, directly and in detail, from multiple reliable sources – such as the ones which are |clearly listed in the article for instance. Goodness me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE)