Deletion of Ralph de Warenne (2nd nomination)

Comment: Do we really have to do this again? A historical figure does not have to do something noteworthy to be ''|notable''. There doesn't have to be a lot known for ''significant coverage'' to exist. Case in point, the rather undistinguished Ralph de Warenne has received significant coverage in the multiple reliable sources cited in the article, mainly because of his potential connection to the Whitchurch Warennes. There is no . The main secondary sources cited (Farrer 1923; Farrer & Clay 1949; Eyton 1859) are specifically about Ralph de Warenne and the article summarises what they say about him. The more tangential mentions in other secondary sources, and the few primary sources, are used appropriately, to clarify points of fact and make what is, as you say, an obscure and convoluted historical topic a little easier to parse
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:SYNTH)