Deletion of Karalina Tjapko

Comment: A few points.  First, its worth pointing out that  is an essay and not a guideline, similar to .  Second I dont know how one 'fails'  as it merely shows how notability or deletion are supported.  Of a similar note, I dont see how any of the listed points, either for deletion or notability, are relevant for this person and thus dont know how its 'failed'.  Third, it seems like the martial arts project wants to expand its reach.  Not only a wrestler being claimed as one that the martial arts project has authority over, but even boxing seems to be getting roped in (see deletion discussion for Mickey Goodwin).  While one can argue if wrestling and boxing are martial arts, the  are not written with a wrestler in mind.  There is no 'finding of a wrestling style' as would be needed for 2.  The 2nd half of 3 states that world champion of an 'organization', but that seems more geared to UFC/Bellator than what is commonly considered a governing body.  There are no 'belts' in wrestling as 4 discusses and typically books in an 'art' are not common in wrestling.  That leaves 1 and the first part of 3, which would apply to almost any athlete, not specifically a martial artist.  I just dont see  it carrying weight here.  That leaves us with WP:GNG and I think as said before WP:SPORTCRIT is met and thus a presumption of GNG applies
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MANOTE||WP:CFBCOACH||WP:MANOTE)