Deletion of Shiply (2nd nomination)

Comment: While there has been an issue of conflict of interest with the company editting this article, the content is not in such a shape as to be irredeemable spam.  With respect to citations not meeting verifiability, I am unclear on why the nominator believes this to be the case.  There are primary sources (company's own web site) and press releases being used.  However, the references also include an article in the http://www.nytimes.com/external/venturebeat/2010/08/20/20venturebeat-shipping-goes-green-as-shiply-expands-across-76729.html?partner=rss&emc=rss New York Times which features the company as the primary subject.  Ditto for http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/1869770/shiply-aims-build-european-green-logistics-network BusinessGreen, http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-business/article-23762098-amid-all-the-gloom-heres-one-man-on-the-road-to-success.do The Evening Standard, and http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sponsored/business/businesstruth/5314494/Plan-to-cut-transport-waste-moving-forward-with-Shiply.com.html The Telegraph, as well as significant coverage in http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/entrepreneur/article5438701.ece The Times, and http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/consumertips/4697744/Confessions-of-a-saveaholic-How-I-saved-more-than-1000-by-shopping-around.html The Telegraph.  Aside from BusienssGreen, all of these are well-respected major newspapers and certainly represent the |reliable sources we would expect for an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)