Deletion of Dhoom 3 (2nd nomination)

Comment: Not in production but still plenty of notability; a thing doesn't have to yeti|exist to be notable.  http://www.indianexpress.com/news/srk-to-play-baddie-in-dhoom-3/468081/ Indian Express reports negotiations here, http://entertainment.oneindia.in/bollywood/news/2009/shahrukh-dhoom-3-250509.html One India has the same story here, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/srk-not-in-dhoom-3-yash-raj-films/93681-8.html IBN Live has Yash Raj denying them here, http://movies.indiatimes.com/news-gossip/gossip/Neil-Nitin-Mukesh-in-Dhoom-3/articleshow/5606717.cms India Times has more recent news here, and that's just English language sources.  Passes  requirement of significant coverage in independent reliable sources, despite not being in production yet.  Another example of a film that would have merited an article despite being nowhere near production would have been the Watchmen film at any point during its 10-year-long development hell
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)