Deletion of Boungcloud Attack

Comment: Articles on chess openings are excellent for those openings where some professional has provided some analysis, or where it is played a lot. Now, in all fairness this opening ''has'' been played according to ChessBase (http://www.chesslive.de/), but with only six examples, and those examples probably being some silly joke in junior tournaments, that is not "played much". There is no professional analysis or other reliable coverage for such a ridiculous and obscure move either. (Although I should say that "ridiculous" and "has reliable coverage" are not mutually exclusive concepts, e.g. Barnes Opening has reliable coverage in the ''Oxford Companion to Chess''.) If openings like this, which were |made up one day are accepted, then I should perhaps play 1.h4 and follow it through with 2.Rh2, and call the result the "Sjakkalle Attack". (But then again, maybe not, I take the Hordaland Circuit Championship this weekend more seriously than that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT)