Deletion of Free World

Comment: The current state of the article is indeed "super flawed", but |deletion is not for clean-up. Potential sources exist, even if few are cited at present. DICDEF does not apply, as even in its current state the article goes far beyond just a definition, and there is potential for historical, political, and sociological discussion of the topic. Editors and the closing admin should also note the recent discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leader of the Free World
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:UGLY)