Deletion of Family tree of Confucius in the main line of descent

Comment: This is a terrible article, but it could be turned into a good one. At the moment, it is too focused on genealogical information and undoubtedly fails Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary#Wikipedia is not a genealogical dictionary#|WP:NOT. However, if you read Confucious#Descendants|the relevant section of the Confucius article, you will see multiple RSs making clear that Confucius' family line is notable (not merely that his descendants are notable, but the actual family tree is notable) and discussed in multiple RSs (as per ). I remember seeing coverage of the publication of the last edition of the genealogy on a China Central Television|CCTV national news bulletin. There's also a RS http://www.chinapost.com.tw/commentary/the-china-post/joe-hung/2009/07/27/217923/excess-bureaucratic.htm suggesting that a Republic of China (Taiwan) sinecure follows this family tree.  All the information is verifiable (and ''pace'' {{u|Power~enwiki}}, |we don't require sources to be in English
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOENG)