Deletion of Lynx Equity Ltd

Comment: It is clear that the "Keep" !voters above are misinterpreting the guidelines for notability, especially  and . References derived from company PR, company announcements and normal business announcements do not meet the criteria for establishing notability since they are not "intellectually" independent. The quantity of sources only suggests a functional PR department. {{u|ViktoriaCerena}} suggests that "independent in-depth references from reliable sources" have been added but looking at the sources added, it is clear that while the sources may be independent, the articles are not since they rely almost exclusively on company material with no independent opinion or commentary. For example, http://www.privateequitywire.co.uk/2017/04/21/250911/howard-kennedy-advises-lynx-equity-second-uk-acquisition this added references from privateequitywire is not independent as it is a joint announcement from the company and the law firm that advised them on an acquisition and fails ORGIND and/or CORPDEPTH. https://www.pehub.com/canada/2016/2/need-to-meet-brad-nathan-president-of-lynx-equity/# This reference from pehub.com is an interview with the company president, offers no independent commentary or opinion, and fails CORPDEPTH and/or ORGIND. I could go on but you get the point
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)