Deletion of K. Johnston

Comment: I had noticed the same thing as DGG and held off commenting until now because of it. Her top-cited paper in Google scholar ("Strange-quark contributions") has a citation-to-author ratio of less than three, and she appears in a middling position, so it is difficult to find a convincing case for notability via #C1. Directing a center is not an indication of notability (huge numbers of academics do this, basically because it sounds more impressive to call your group of grad students a center than to call them your group of grad students). And the Sigma Xi award appears to be very local, something that they give on a per-chapter (that is, per-university) basis rather than a national-level award, and has no sources independent of Johnston herself. So I don't see a basis for notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I'm not finding enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show they pass , and as pointed out by {{u|David Eppstein}}, they don't pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SCHOLAR)