News Finding: [related]
  
  The final analysis shows that the mixed-reality game improved learning by almost five times more than the screen-only alternatives, both in the mouse-controlled and physically controlled conditions.
Paper Finding: We can consider what choice improves learning most over a typical virtual, mouse-control game (#1 in Figure 10 ).
News Context: [related]
  
  The final analysis shows that the mixed-reality game improved learning by almost five times more than the screen-only alternatives, both in the mouse-controlled and physically controlled conditions. Not only that, but students enjoyed the game more in the mixed-reality conditions. They also determined that simple physical controls like shaking the tablet or pushing the earthquake button did little to improve either learning or enjoyment of the game.
Paper Context: These results show that mixed-reality led to more learning than screen only, for both the mousecontrol and physical-control conditions ( Figure 10 ). We can consider what choice improves learning most over a typical virtual, mouse-control game (#1 in Figure 10 ). The mixed-reality, mouse-control condition (#2) is significantly better (p<0.05), but the virtual, physicalcontrol condition (#3) is not.