copenlu/druid huggingface dataset:
Claim: Says a 2010 Rockefeller Foundation report shows the COVID-19 pandemic and the international response were “meticulously planned at least 10 years ago.” (Facebook posts, 2021-06-06)
Evidence (2021-11-17): Response-focused investment spans both short- and long-term response. Investment in short-term response includes both preparedness and the first few months of a response phase. For instance, the IPPPR facility is designed such that international finance institutions and multilateral and regional bank capital would kick in after 3–4 months, with the ability to cover months 3–18 of a pandemic (Radin and Eleftheriades, 2021). Proposed investments in a longer-term response include the Rockefeller Plan (2021), which called for $44 billion through IMF Special Drawing Rights for COVID-19; this plan could potentially be replicated in another pandemic scenario (The Rockefeller Foundation, 2021).
Claim: Says a 2010 Rockefeller Foundation report shows the COVID-19 pandemic and the international response were “meticulously planned at least 10 years ago.” (Facebook posts, 2021-06-06)
Evidence (2021-10-12): Under mounting pressure from its constituencies, the GHWA developed the CCF framework that provided advice and guidance on intersectoral and multi-constituency collaboration to accelerate the implementation of a country’s HRH agenda. As a result, the CCF approach was implemented in several countries, demonstrating positive outcomes in the GHWA’s external and internal evaluations. The GHWA completed its 10-year lifespan as a partnership of the WHO in 2016, replaced by the Global Health Workforce Network. At this critical point, the GHWA legacy report reviewed and illustrated its policies, initiatives, and their impacts [37]. The CCF framework for national planning and development was extensively discussed in the report. The report recognizes its systems perspective and the GHWA Board’s focus on the critical gap in HRH planning coordination at national levels.
Claim: Says a 2010 Rockefeller Foundation report shows the COVID-19 pandemic and the international response were “meticulously planned at least 10 years ago.” (Facebook posts, 2021-06-06)
Evidence (2020-04-14): International Response - Pillar 1: Protecting U.S. Citizens and Maintaining U.S. Operations. State reported obligating supplemental funding to maintain consular operations, which faced a significant decline in visa and passport fees resulting from the pandemic. State planned to use supplemental funds to, among other things, increase secure communications bandwidth, accessibility, and support for those working remotely; expand cloud and email storage capacity; and support efforts by the Bureau of Medical Services to continue effectively and safely achieving State’s mission domestically and overseas by contracting for experts in areas such as infectious disease, mental health, and statistical analysis of health data. Efforts also included purchasing and distributing personal protective and testing equipment, targeted hiring, and adding capacity for medical evacuation travel and contract aviation to continue international operations in the face of reduced global commercial airline service.
Claim: Says a 2010 Rockefeller Foundation report shows the COVID-19 pandemic and the international response were “meticulously planned at least 10 years ago.” (Facebook posts, 2021-06-06)
Evidence (2023-05-01): The COVID-19 pandemic, which lasted for three years, has had a great impact on the public health system, society and economy of cities, revealing the insufficiency of urban resilience under large-scale public health events (PHEs). Given that a city is a networked and multidimensional system with complex interactions, it is helpful to improve urban resilience under PHEs based on system thinking. Therefore, this paper proposes a dynamic and systematic urban resilience framework that incorporates four subsystems (governance, infrastructures, socioeconomy and energy-material flows). The composite index, system dynamics and epidemic simulation model are integrated into the framework to show the nonlinear relationships in the urban system and reflect the changing trend of urban resilience under PHEs. Then, urban resilience under different epidemic scenarios and response policy scenarios is calculated and discussed to provide some suggestions for decision-makers when faced with the trade-off between the control of PHEs and the maintenance of city operation.
Claim: Says a 2010 Rockefeller Foundation report shows the COVID-19 pandemic and the international response were “meticulously planned at least 10 years ago.” (Facebook posts, 2021-06-06)
Evidence (2023-01-20): The 10-point plan: a blueprint for action
Claim: Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito said that the U.S. needs a “domestic supply of infants” to meet the needs of parents seeking to adopt. (Facebook posts, 2022-05-07)
Evidence (2022-05-07): The phrase was not written by Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito. The line appears in the opinion draft as a footnote and came from a 2008 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention document about adoption data. The draft says the opinion was authored by Alito. It does not list Barrett as an author.
Claim: Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito said that the U.S. needs a “domestic supply of infants” to meet the needs of parents seeking to adopt. (Facebook posts, 2022-05-07)
Evidence (2022-06-25): WASHINGTON (AP) — More than a month ago, a stunning leak of a draft opinion by Justice Samuel Alito indicated that the Supreme Court was prepared to take the momentous step of overruling the landmark decision in Roe v. Wade from 1973 and stripping away women’s constitutional protections for abortion. [...] A look at some of the justices’ earlier comments through the years: [...] JUSTICE AMY CONEY BARRETT
Claim: Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito said that the U.S. needs a “domestic supply of infants” to meet the needs of parents seeking to adopt. (Facebook posts, 2022-05-07)
Evidence (2024-09-08): Amy Vivian Coney Barrett (born January 28, 1972) is an American lawyer and jurist serving since 2020 as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.[1] The fifth woman to serve on the court, she was nominated by President Donald Trump. Barrett was a U.S. circuit judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit from 2017 to 2020. [...] Amy Vivian Coney was born in 1972 in New Orleans, Louisiana, to Linda (née Vath) and Michael Coney.[20][21] The eldest of seven children, she has five sisters and a brother. Her father worked as an attorney for Shell Oil Company, and her mother was a high school French teacher and homemaker. Barrett has Irish and French ancestry.[22][23] Her maternal ancestors were from Ballyconnell, County Cavan, Ireland, while there is also Irish lineage among her father's ancestors. Her great-great-grandparents emigrated from France to New Orleans.[24] Her family is devoutly Catholic, and her father is an ordained deacon at St. Catherine of Siena Parish in Metairie, Louisiana, where she grew up.[25][26] Barrett attended St. Mary's Dominican High School, an all-girls Roman Catholic high school in New Orleans.[27] She was student body vice president of the school and graduated in 1990.[28]
Claim: Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito said that the U.S. needs a “domestic supply of infants” to meet the needs of parents seeking to adopt. (Facebook posts, 2022-05-07)
Evidence (2022-05-07): Amy Coney Barrett, Samuel Alito Reference ‘Domestic Supply Of Infants’ In Attempts To Overturn Roe V. Wade [...] In the draft, which was leaked to Politico, Alito references adoption as a reason for abortion to be overturned, using the phrase "domestic supply of infants" to indicate that less abortion would help increase the supply of babies that adoptive mothers are seeking—and that current safe haven laws and other programs allow women to safely give their children up with no repercussions. Many have picked up on the phrase, as Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who was appointed and confirmed to the court in the final weeks of Donald Trump’s presidency prior to his losing the election to President Joe Biden, made a similar argument in December when hearing the Dobbs v. Jackson case addressing Mississippi’s 15-week abortion ban. During that time, Barrett, who is an adoptive mother argued that adoption still protects women from forced motherhood and "the choice, more focused, would be between, say, the ability to get an abortion at 23 weeks, or the state requiring the woman to go 15, 16 weeks more and then terminate parental rights at the conclusion," Salon reports.
Claim: Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito said that the U.S. needs a “domestic supply of infants” to meet the needs of parents seeking to adopt. (Facebook posts, 2022-05-07)
Evidence (2022-05-12): Three Supreme Court justices — Samuel Alito, Amy Coney Barrett and Clarence Thomas — live in the county. Justices living in and outside the county have been confronted with protests outside their homes since a draft of Alito’s opinion that would overturn the Roe v. Wade abortion-rights decision was leaked.
Claim: Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito said that the U.S. needs a “domestic supply of infants” to meet the needs of parents seeking to adopt. (Facebook posts, 2022-05-07)
Evidence (2024-06-19): But Barrett, Kagan, Sotomayor and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson parted ways with those five justices.
Claim: Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito said that the U.S. needs a “domestic supply of infants” to meet the needs of parents seeking to adopt. (Facebook posts, 2022-05-07)
Evidence (2022-05-13): Many falsely attributed the words to Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito, claiming that the two said the U.S. needed this "supply" of babies to meet the needs of people seeking to adopt. "BREAKING: In a brief re abortion, Supreme court Justices Amy Coney Barrett/Alito's Draft, said US needs a ‘domestic supply of infants’ to meet needs of parents seeking to adopt — that those who would otherwise abort must be made to carry to term — giving children up for adoption," reads one post that’s been shared over 21,000 times on Twitter. [...] Social media posts claim that Justices Alito and Barrett said the U.S. needs a "domestic supply of infants" for adoptive parents in their justification to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Claim: Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito said that the U.S. needs a “domestic supply of infants” to meet the needs of parents seeking to adopt. (Facebook posts, 2022-05-07)
Evidence (2022-05-09): A viral tweet claims that Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito justified overturning Roe v. Wade in the leaked draft majority opinion because "the US needs a ‘domestic supply of infants.’" [...] The draft was written by Alito, not Barrett and Alito as the tweet suggests. The section of the opinion from which the quote is pulled is a footnote, with the line not being written by Barrett or Alito, but coming from a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention paper on adoption. The line reads: "[N]early 1 million women were seeking to adopt children in 2002 (i.e., they were in demand of a child), whereas the domestic supply of infants relinquished at birth or within the first month of life and available to be adopted had become virtually nonexistent." [...] From the context of the footnote, it’s clear that the CDC quote appeared in the footnote only to highlight the fact that unwanted babies put up for adoption in the United States will likely find a family—not, as the tweet implies, that domestic birth rates need to increase to meet adoption demands. What’s more, the paragraph in which the footnote appears is about the arguments of pro-life Americans, taking place in a summary of the public debate surrounding abortion. Immediately preceding the above paragraph is another summing up the beliefs of pro-abortion Americans, which reads:
Claim: Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito said that the U.S. needs a “domestic supply of infants” to meet the needs of parents seeking to adopt. (Facebook posts, 2022-05-07)
Evidence (2022-06-24): The draft opinion, written by Justice Samuel Alito, reportedly had the support of Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, according to Politico, which published the draft on May 2. The latter three of those justices were all nominated by then-President Donald Trump. The court has confirmed the authenticity of the draft, but said it didn’t represent "the final position" of any justice. [...] The third and final of Trump’s Supreme Court nominees, Amy Coney Barrett, was upfront about her history of supporting the Catholic Church’s teaching on "the sacredness of life from conception to natural death." And she was noncommittal during Senate confirmation hearings in October 2020 about whether she might overturn Roe v. Wade.
Claim: Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito said that the U.S. needs a “domestic supply of infants” to meet the needs of parents seeking to adopt. (Facebook posts, 2022-05-07)
Evidence (2024-06-12): Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito really wasn’t caught. The religious zeal reflected in the surreptitious recordings made public this week has long been evident in Alito’s statements and written opinions. [...] And as much as Alito’s new comments reflected his broader approach to the law, they also stood in contrast to Chief Justice John Roberts’ measured response when he was similarly baited at the Supreme Court Historical Society gala dinner last week. [...] Alito, 74, is one of six Roman Catholics on the nine-member bench. More than most of his colleagues, he has not shied from headlining religious-sponsored events or quoting scripture. Themes of religious conservatism have permeated his opinions. He has opposed abortion rights, gay marriage and LGBTQ equality.
Claim: Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito said that the U.S. needs a “domestic supply of infants” to meet the needs of parents seeking to adopt. (Facebook posts, 2022-05-07)
Evidence (2023-11-09): And sure enough Trump nominated Judge Amy Coney Barrett, who is closely affiliated with the Federalist Society:
Claim: Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito said that the U.S. needs a “domestic supply of infants” to meet the needs of parents seeking to adopt. (Facebook posts, 2022-05-07)
Evidence (2022-05-09): CLAIM: U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett cited a need for a "domestic supply of infants" in a leaked draft opinion for a decision that would overturn Roe v. Wade. [...] But others are falsely conflating the two. "BREAKING: In a brief re abortion, Supreme court Justices Amy Coney Barrett/Alito’s Draft, said US needs a ‘domestic supply of infants’ to meet needs of parents seeking to adopt — that those who would otherwise abort must be made to carry to term — giving children up for adoption," reads one post with more than 35,000 retweets on Twitter and also spread widely as a screenshot on Facebook. "Justice Amy Coney Barrett Wants To Overturn Roe To Create A ‘Domestic Supply Of Infants’ For Adoption," said a headline on a widely-shared blog post, although the post itself never actually mentions Barrett.
Claim: Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito said that the U.S. needs a “domestic supply of infants” to meet the needs of parents seeking to adopt. (Facebook posts, 2022-05-07)
Evidence (2022-05-07): Posts misattribute quote about the US needing a ‘domestic supply of infants’ to Alito, Barrett [...] "BREAKING: In a brief re abortion, Supreme court Justices Amy Coney Barrett/Alito's Draft, said US needs a ‘domestic supply of infants’ to meet needs of parents seeking to adopt — that those who would otherwise abort must be made to carry to term — giving children up for adoption," reads one post that’s been shared over 21,000 times on Twitter. [...] Social media posts claim that Justices Alito and Barrett said the U.S. needs a "domestic supply of infants" for adoptive parents in their justification to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Claim: Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito said that the U.S. needs a “domestic supply of infants” to meet the needs of parents seeking to adopt. (Facebook posts, 2022-05-07)
Evidence (2024-06-01): Yet adoption is not simple, clean, or easy. Adoption is a complex amalgam of business enterprise and social welfare program. It takes advantage of racism, patriarchy, and poverty to create the "domestic supply of infants" necessary to meet the needs of mostly White adoptive parents. And it takes pains to present itself as wholly positive for birth parents, adoptees, and adoptive parents. Against that idealized picture of adoption, legislators and judges create law where adoption is the perfect substitute for abortion. But this is only possible if we ignore the more complex and ambivalent view of adoption that we become familiar with by listening to birth parents and adopted persons.
Claim: Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito said that the U.S. needs a “domestic supply of infants” to meet the needs of parents seeking to adopt. (Facebook posts, 2022-05-07)
Evidence (2022-09-05): After the draft leaked, many Court observers predicted that, though the opinion’s substance wasn’t likely to change, its tone surely would. It might at least lose a chilling reference to an insufficient "domestic supply" of adoptable infants—a problem that would be fixed, presumably, by forcing more Americans to carry pregnancies to term. But the final version was virtually unchanged, save for the addition of a sharp rebuke to the dissent. (An investigation into the leak is supposedly ongoing; according to Biskupic, clerks were asked to sign affidavits and provide cell-phone records.)
Claim: Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito said that the U.S. needs a “domestic supply of infants” to meet the needs of parents seeking to adopt. (Facebook posts, 2022-05-07)
Evidence (2022-05-13): Amy Coney Barrett, 'domestic supply of infants' and 'dehumanizing' language [...] Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who along with two other justices has adopted children, raised the issue during oral arguments late last year. Barrett noted all 50 states now have a safe haven law and asked, "Why don’t the safe haven laws take care of that problem?" — referring to forced parenting. [...] Allen-Nehrbass noted the draft opinion also includes a footnote to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study that refers to "the domestic supply of infants."
Claim: Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito said that the U.S. needs a “domestic supply of infants” to meet the needs of parents seeking to adopt. (Facebook posts, 2022-05-07)
Evidence (2022-02-14): Barrett certainly knows something about adoption: she and Jesse adopted two of their children from an orphanage in Haiti. She has spoken about their daughter Vivian coming to South Bend as a malnourished fourteen-month-old, and about their son John Peter arriving soon after the 2010 earthquake. Yet her remarks about safe havens sounded oddly naïve about other people’s experiences of family, childbearing, and adoption. She made no reference to the fact that pregnancy and childbirth pose more health dangers to women than legal abortion does—or that the majority of women who have abortions already have children at home, which means that safeguarding the health of those women protects their living children. Barrett also appeared to assume that people who relinquish their infants will no longer be implicated in any sort of relationship with them.
Claim: Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito said that the U.S. needs a “domestic supply of infants” to meet the needs of parents seeking to adopt. (Facebook posts, 2022-05-07)
Evidence (2024-02-26): States began passing so-called safe haven laws more than two decades ago. Texas passed the first safe haven law in 1999, and soon every state had its own version. For some in the anti-abortion rights movement, safe haven laws — and by extension baby boxes — are an answer to critics who say restricting abortion rights will lead to more unwanted babies. U.S. Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito both cited safe haven laws during the landmark Dobbs v. Jackson case that ended the constitutional right to abortion. [...] Michelle Oberman, a law professor at Santa Clara University in California who has studied state safe haven policies, said states have different rules for drop-off locations and how old a surrendered infant can be, and varying protections for parents when an infant tests positive for illegal substances. Some laws require surrendered infants to be placed into foster care, while others fast-track them into adoptions. Few, if any, require the kind of oversight that would ensure the infant surrenders are truly voluntary and not coerced, she said. [...] "Some of the adoption agencies might get ticked off at us, but we’re not here to supply babies for them," Kelsey said. "We’re here to help moms."
Claim: Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito said that the U.S. needs a “domestic supply of infants” to meet the needs of parents seeking to adopt. (Facebook posts, 2022-05-07)
Evidence (2022-05-10): You would not know this from reading Alito’s opinion. [...] Some of Alito’s rhetorical flourishes may not survive in the final opinion. For example, the kicker to this sentence — "Until the latter part of the 20th century, there was no support in American law for a constitutional right to obtain an abortion" — is "Zero. None." That reveals a zealot’s glee. That’s a small point, but along with the reintroduction of crude language from the violent anti-abortion movement like "abortionist" and "unborn human beings" and even, the Malthusian reference to the need for a "domestic supply of infants," this is ideological warfare dressed up in legal language.
Claim: Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito said that the U.S. needs a “domestic supply of infants” to meet the needs of parents seeking to adopt. (Facebook posts, 2022-05-07)
Evidence (2024-02-22): The Mythical Adoption RemedyThe Mythical Adoption Remedy Dobbs and AdoptionDobbs and Adoption
Claim: Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito said that the U.S. needs a “domestic supply of infants” to meet the needs of parents seeking to adopt. (Facebook posts, 2022-05-07)
Evidence (2023-04-05): "If we make abortion harder, there will be more babies to adopt. Period," she said definitively in a March interview with The Beacon. [...] Ms. Dusky makes no bones about lawmakers’ support for funneling babies into adoption. They’re even made explicit in a footnote in the Dobbs decision, she said, in which Justice Samuel Alito’s draft of the majority opinion stated, quoting the CDC, that ‘nearly 1 million women were seeking to adopt children in 2002, whereas the domestic supply of infants relinquished at birth or within the first month of life and available to be adopted had become virtually nonexistent.’ Alito pointed out the prevalence of anonymous "safe-haven boxes" where women can leave their unwanted babies as a possible solution for women who are assumed to not want to raise children, while Justice Amy Coney Barrett (who is an adoptive parent) said at a hearing that these boxes enable women to quickly free themselves from the "burdens of parenting."