copenlu/druid huggingface dataset:
Claim: Bath and Body Works products are not recommended during pregnancy because they are suspected of “damaging fertility or the unborn child.” (Facebook posts, 2022-04-18)
Evidence (2022-04-18): The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists told PolitiFact that it has no official recommendation about pregnant women not using Bath & Body Works products. People who are pregnant should speak to their doctors if they have questions about any product. [...] "Did you know that Bath & Body Works products are actually not recommended to use while pregnant?" one April 18 post shared on Facebook begins. "Neither did I because I never thought to read their safety data sheets. Straight from their safety data sheet it reads and I quote, ‘suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child’ and, ‘may cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure.’" [...] A Facebook post claims that Bath & Body Works products are not recommended to use while pregnant and points to warnings of infertility and organ failure.
Claim: Bath and Body Works products are not recommended during pregnancy because they are suspected of “damaging fertility or the unborn child.” (Facebook posts, 2022-04-18)
Evidence (2022-04-25): The post was published April 18 by Jillian Autumn, who writes that "Bath & Body works products are actually not recommended to use while pregnant." The post has since been shared over 100,000 times. She cited the company's safety data sheets posted online, which include wording that products may be "suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child" or "may cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure." [...] "Bath & Body Works posts these sheets to assist manufacturing companies and emergency personnel who need to know how to handle, store or dispose of large quantities of chemicals in industrial and manufacturing settings. As with any product a customer may use during pregnancy, we encourage them to consult a doctor if they have specific questions."
Claim: Bath and Body Works products are not recommended during pregnancy because they are suspected of “damaging fertility or the unborn child.” (Facebook posts, 2022-04-18)
Evidence (2023-06-01): - If you are unable to stop, look for ways to decrease your baby's exposure. [...] Always stay with your baby while they are bathing. Never leave your child unsupervised while in the tub. [...] Talk to your partner, family and friends. You may want to seek out a professional for help. Reach out to a health care provider, psychologist or social worker who specializes in pregnancy or infant loss and grief. There may be support in your community – search online for support groups or peer support. If you find help online, be sure it is offered by a credible organization.
Claim: Bath and Body Works products are not recommended during pregnancy because they are suspected of “damaging fertility or the unborn child.” (Facebook posts, 2022-04-18)
Evidence (2018-03-18): Getting lots of rest and keeping hydrated will also help speed up recovery. [...] Pregnant women should contact their doctor’s office if they have other symptoms, including: [...] These risks have lowered significantly in recent years because of:
Claim: Bath and Body Works products are not recommended during pregnancy because they are suspected of “damaging fertility or the unborn child.” (Facebook posts, 2022-04-18)
Evidence (2012-01-01): Don't guess what you should do. Get accurate Poison Control answers online or by phone. Both are free and confidential. [...] Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter for news, updates, and events! [...] Call 1-800-222-1222 to reach Poison Control anywhere in the United States.
Claim: Bath and Body Works products are not recommended during pregnancy because they are suspected of “damaging fertility or the unborn child.” (Facebook posts, 2022-04-18)
Evidence (2023-09-21): Whether or not you’re using, your health and pregnancy matter! [...] People who are able to reduce their smoking or quit during pregnancy decreased the risk of SUID by 12 to 21 percent, so it is recommended to smoke as few cigarettes as possible. [...] Factors that may increase of PMADs risk are:
Claim: Bath and Body Works products are not recommended during pregnancy because they are suspected of “damaging fertility or the unborn child.” (Facebook posts, 2022-04-18)
Evidence (2018-11-14): Also, don’t give the affected person alcohol to drink. [...] - Call triple zero (000) and ask for an ambulance. [...] In the case of a severe allergic reaction:
Claim: Bath and Body Works products are not recommended during pregnancy because they are suspected of “damaging fertility or the unborn child.” (Facebook posts, 2022-04-18)
Evidence (2021-05-07): By — Laura Santhanam Laura Santhanam Leave a comment 0comments Share Copy URL https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/broken-tired-and-ashamed-how-health-care-fails-new-moms Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Tumblr Share on Facebook Share on Twitter It’s time to recognize the damage of childbirth, doctors and mothers say Health May 7, 2021 5:50 PM EDT Generations of women have quietly endured the messy business of giving birth. Even after reading stacks of pregnancy books, faithfully following their health care provider’s advice and successfully delivering a healthy baby, women often enter motherhood with what suddenly feels like a broken body. They involuntarily pee when they sneeze or cough. It hurts to sit. They may feel consumed by anxiety or depression. Often, they feel too ashamed to ask for help, especially when they are laser-focused on trying to care for their brand-new baby. Many find that when they do speak up, their concerns are waved away as part of the healing process — one of the wide array of "normal" changes that happen to the body after giving birth.
Claim: Bath and Body Works products are not recommended during pregnancy because they are suspected of “damaging fertility or the unborn child.” (Facebook posts, 2022-04-18)
Evidence (2017-10-16): People may experience some of the following: [...] - reduces your pain perception and may result in injury - carries greater risk if mixed with alcohol or other stimulants, especially if you have high blood pressure or if you have an existing heart condition - can harm your baby during pregnancy, and may cause miscarriage - can increase the risk of mental health issues such a s anxiety, paranoia and psychosis - if snorted, can cause damage to the lining of the nasal passage and nose - if injected, can cause vein collapse and increased risk of HIV and hepatitis infection. [...] - avoid using again straight away - eat some healthy food to recover and restore energy - stay hydrated - rest as much as you can – your body and brain need time to heal - get some fresh air - be kind to yourself – avoid people or places that stress you out, and do things that make you feel good like a hot bath or listening to music.
Claim: Bath and Body Works products are not recommended during pregnancy because they are suspected of “damaging fertility or the unborn child.” (Facebook posts, 2022-04-18)
Evidence (2022-04-29): The claim: Document shows Bath & Body Works products are not recommended for use while pregnant [...] Did you know that Bath & Body works products are actually not recommended to use while pregnant? Straight from their safety data sheet it reads "suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child" and, "may cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure." Imagine how harmful they are to our pre-teen and teenage daughters? NO WONDER we have so many women struggling with infertility, hormone disruptions, migraines, thyroid complications… I could go on and on!!! [...] We rate FALSE the claim that a document shows Bath & Body Works products shouldn't be used while pregnant. The document on which these viral claims are based only addresses an air freshener and is a warning for employees at chemical manufacturing facilities, not for consumers. The document does not warn of pregnancy risks for consumers who use Bath & Body Works products.
Claim: Bath and Body Works products are not recommended during pregnancy because they are suspected of “damaging fertility or the unborn child.” (Facebook posts, 2022-04-18)
Evidence (2022-04-23): CLAIM: Bath & Body Works’ safety data sheet warns its products aren’t recommended for pregnant women. [...] "Did you know that Bath & Body works products are actually not recommended to use while pregnant? Neither did I because I never thought to read their safety data sheets," reads one Facebook post from April 18 that has been shared more than 101,000 times."Straight from their safety data sheet it reads ‘suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child’ and, ‘may cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure.’" [...] "Every Bath & Body Works product undergoes extensive review to ensure safety," Bath & Body Works said in a statement provided by a company spokesperson. "Bath & Body Works posts these sheets to assist manufacturing companies and emergency personnel who need to know how to handle, store or dispose of large quantities of chemicals in industrial and manufacturing settings. As with any product a customer may use during pregnancy, we encourage them to consult a doctor if they have specific questions."
Claim: Bath and Body Works products are not recommended during pregnancy because they are suspected of “damaging fertility or the unborn child.” (Facebook posts, 2022-04-18)
Evidence (2024-07-22): Stories from the Environmental Factor (NIEHS Newsletter) [...] This content is available to use on your website. Please visit NIEHS Syndication to get started.
Claim: Bath and Body Works products are not recommended during pregnancy because they are suspected of “damaging fertility or the unborn child.” (Facebook posts, 2022-04-18)
Evidence (2022-04-20): Did you know that Bath & Body works products are actually not recommended to use while pregnant? Yeah, neither did I because I never thought to read their safety data sheets. Like oh, if it’s on the shelves it must be OK for the human body, right? No. Not right. Straight from their safety data sheet it reads and I quote, "suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child" and, "may cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure." I’m sorry, come again??? The products that have been US glorified FOR YEARS because "they smell good" or, "they have the best candles" have a warning label that use could harm an unborn child, a woman’s hormones AND their organs? And once again I’m reminded that the world doesn’t keep spinning and generate revenue if you and I are healthy. #isaidwhatisaid
Claim: Bath and Body Works products are not recommended during pregnancy because they are suspected of “damaging fertility or the unborn child.” (Facebook posts, 2022-04-18)
Evidence (2023-09-05): Source: HBM4EU (HBM4EU, 2022b). [...] Source: HBM4EU (HBM4EU, 2022c) [...] Source: Based on human biomonitoring data from the HBM4EU Dashboard (HBM4EU, 2022d)
Claim: Bath and Body Works products are not recommended during pregnancy because they are suspected of “damaging fertility or the unborn child.” (Facebook posts, 2022-04-18)
Evidence (2024-09-30): Go to 111.nhs.uk or call 111 [...] You can report any suspected side effect using the Yellow Card safety scheme. [...] Talk to your doctor, pharmacist, midwife or health visitor if your baby is not feeding as well as usual, seems unusually sleepy, seems irritable, or if you have any other concerns about your baby.
Claim: The Washington Post was "forced to correct what (Donald Trump) told the secretary of state of Georgia.” (Maria Bartiromo, 2021-03-16)
Evidence (2021-03-16): The Washington Post has not changed its reporting on former President Donald Trump’s Jan. 2 call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. The Post did correct a report about another call between Trump and a different state elections official. The recording of Trump’s call with Raffensperger shows Trump pressuring him to "find" enough votes to overturn the state’s election results, as the Washington Post reported. The Jan. 9 report that the Washington Post did correct was published after — not before — the Senate runoff elections in Georgia, which took place on Jan. 5.
Claim: The Washington Post was "forced to correct what (Donald Trump) told the secretary of state of Georgia.” (Maria Bartiromo, 2021-03-16)
Evidence (2021-03-16): The Washington Post has not changed its reporting on former President Donald Trump’s Jan. 2 call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. The Post did correct a report about another call between Trump and a different state elections official. [...] "Let's talk about the Washington Post and what took place yesterday, with the Washington Post being forced to correct what you told the secretary of state of Georgia," Bartiromo said. [...] "The Washington Post initially accused you of a crime, based on fabricating quotes, and the rest of the media ran with it," Bartiromo said, before reading from the Post’s correction. "I know you put out a statement about this story, Mr. President. But tell us what your reaction is that the Washington Post had to correct this fake news that they reported that you told the secretary of state of Georgia to find the fraud and find the votes right before the Senate race."
Claim: The Washington Post was "forced to correct what (Donald Trump) told the secretary of state of Georgia.” (Maria Bartiromo, 2021-03-16)
Evidence (2024-10-03): So what if Trump called the top election official in Georgia and pressured him to announce the discovery of just enough votes to reverse Biden’s victory in that state? "All I want to do is this: I just want to find 11,780 votes," Trump said, in a conversation he cannot deny because it was recorded. But so what if Trump lies constantly, blatantly, sometimes viciously, even when there is no dispute about the truth? So what if he continues to lie about Haitian immigrants in Ohio, falsely calling them "illegal" and falsely claiming they eat cats and dogs? So what if he lies about crime, about the economy, about kids supposedly having sex reassignment surgeries at their schools?
Claim: The Washington Post was "forced to correct what (Donald Trump) told the secretary of state of Georgia.” (Maria Bartiromo, 2021-03-16)
Evidence (2023-07-25): "No, no you don’t. No, no you don’t," Trump told Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. "You don’t have, you don’t have. Not even close." [...] WSBTV, Georgia Secretary of State on Trump phone call: ‘The data he has is just plain wrong’ Jan. 4, 2021 [...] PolitiFact, "What Trump told Georgia election officials," March 16, 2021
Claim: The Washington Post was "forced to correct what (Donald Trump) told the secretary of state of Georgia.” (Maria Bartiromo, 2021-03-16)
Evidence (2024-10-03): "They called us, and they told us, ‘We have to retaliate, but we’re not going to hit anybody. Just keep your people inside the military base," Trump said. "Of the 18 rockets that were launched, six of them self-destructed, 12 of them — approximately, 12 of them arrived, and when they arrived — very accurate rockets, missiles. And when they arrived, they missed the fort. But they had to do that. And I thought it was a very nice thing, because they didn’t want us to retaliate again."
Claim: The Washington Post was "forced to correct what (Donald Trump) told the secretary of state of Georgia.” (Maria Bartiromo, 2021-03-16)
Evidence (2021-03-16): The Washington Post has added a correction to its story from January that claimed then-President Donald Trump told the chief investigator of the Georgia secretary of state’s office to "find the fraud" in the state’s election and she would become a "national hero." (This is not the same story as the Post’s blockbuster story of Trump’s phone call to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger.) [...] Correction: Two months after publication of this story, the Georgia secretary of state released an audio recording of President Donald Trump’s December phone call with the state’s top elections investigator. The recording revealed that The Post misquoted Trump’s comments on the call, based on information provided by a source. Trump did not tell the investigator to "find the fraud" or say she would be "a national hero" if she did so. Instead, Trump urged the investigator to scrutinize ballots in Fulton County, Ga., asserting she would find "dishonesty" there. He also told her that she had "the most important job in the country right now." A story about the recording can be found here. The headline and text of this story have been corrected to remove quotes misattributed to Trump.
Claim: The Washington Post was "forced to correct what (Donald Trump) told the secretary of state of Georgia.” (Maria Bartiromo, 2021-03-16)
Evidence (2021-03-25): The fact that the biggest newspaper in the nation’s capital—the one that helped lead the charge to impeach Trump—was forced to admit that it "misquoted" the president about his call with the office of the Georgia Secretary of State is a big deal. That call, after all, was cited as one of the justifications for the president’s impeachment. [...] On March 11, however, the Post was forced to correct the original article, stating that the newspaper misquoted President Trump based on false information provided by their source. The Post’s report that Trump told Watson to "find the fraud" and that she would be "a national hero" if she did were completely false. Thus, the main evidence claiming that Trump was obstructing justice in Georgia was gained through reliance on an anonymous source who misled the newspaper. [...] Jordan Fuchs, Deputy Secretary of State of Georgia, has now been identified as the "anonymous" source who provided the false information about the December 23 call. Fuchs has also been identified as the likely source of the leaked recording from Jan. 2, in which President Trump called Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger urging him to overturn the vote in Georgia due to the fraud that Trump believed had changed the outcome of the election.
Claim: The Washington Post was "forced to correct what (Donald Trump) told the secretary of state of Georgia.” (Maria Bartiromo, 2021-03-16)
Evidence (2021-07-30): Donald Trump rejected the establishment consensus that the United States has the right and duty to guard international order by force.
Claim: The Washington Post was "forced to correct what (Donald Trump) told the secretary of state of Georgia.” (Maria Bartiromo, 2021-03-16)
Evidence (2021-03-15): The Washington Post admitted in a correction that it had "misquoted" former President Donald Trump telling Georgia’s top elections investigator "to find the fraud," in December. [...] "Correction: Two months after publication of this story, the Georgia secretary of state released an audio recording of President Donald Trump’s December phone call with the state’s top elections investigator. The recording revealed that The Post misquoted Trump’s comments on the call, based on information provided by a source," the correction published Thursday began. [...] The newspaper appended a shorter version of the correction to the top of a story published online Friday that said an Atlanta-area prosecutor had opened a criminal investigation into attempts to overturn the state’s election results in 2020 following Trump’s phone calls to Gov. Brian Kemp and Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger.
Claim: The Washington Post was "forced to correct what (Donald Trump) told the secretary of state of Georgia.” (Maria Bartiromo, 2021-03-16)
Evidence (2021-03-16): On Jan. 9, The Post reported that then-President Donald Trump, in a call with Georgia’s lead elections investigator, Frances Watson, had instructed her to "find the fraud." He mentioned that she could become a "national hero," reported the newspaper. [...] Evidence of Trump’s improper actions regarding those results piled up before and after the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. Here’s the timeline: On Jan. 2, Trump took part in a phone call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, pressuring him to "‘find’ enough votes to overturn his defeat." The next day, Post reporter Amy Gardner surfaced a recording of that call. Then, on Jan. 9, Gardner broke the now-corrected story of Trump’s call with Watson, which had taken place on Dec. 23. Tracking the phone history of a malfeasant president is a big job. [...] The New York Times quickly matched The Post’s reporting, including the inaccurate quotes. It added a correction on Monday. CNN has appended this editor’s note to its story: "An earlier version of this story, published January 9, presented paraphrasing of the President’s comments to the Georgia elections investigator as direct quotes. The story has been updated following the discovery of an audio recording of the call." ABC News dealt with the issue via an editor’s note.
Claim: The Washington Post was "forced to correct what (Donald Trump) told the secretary of state of Georgia.” (Maria Bartiromo, 2021-03-16)
Evidence (2021-03-15): The Washington Post has corrected a story on Donald Trump to say he never told a Georgia elections investigator in December to "find the fraud" with regards to the presidential election. The lengthy correction stated, "Two months after publication of this story, the Georgia secretary of state released an audio recording of President Donald Trump’s December phone call with the state’s top elections investigator. The recording revealed that The Post misquoted Trump’s comments on the call, based on information provided by a source." [...] This is not to be confused with the Post’s audio recording from Jan. 3 of Trump urging Georgia secretary of state Brad Raffensperger to "find" enough votes to help him overturn the election he lost to President Joe Biden.
Claim: The Washington Post was "forced to correct what (Donald Trump) told the secretary of state of Georgia.” (Maria Bartiromo, 2021-03-16)
Evidence (2021-03-16): - The Post did not retract its story, as some people on social media claimed. The correction did not involve its Jan. 3 reporting about what Trump told Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger during another phone call. The Post published the full audio and transcript of that call. [...] The first story on Jan. 3 reported that Trump repeatedly urged Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to alter the vote during an hour-long phone call. The Post published the full audio and transcript of that call. (This isn’t the one that got a correction.) [...] "Two months after publication of this story, the Georgia secretary of state released an audio recording of President Donald Trump’s December phone call with the state’s top elections investigator. The recording revealed that The Post misquoted Trump’s comments on the call, based on information provided by a source," the correction says.
Claim: The Washington Post was "forced to correct what (Donald Trump) told the secretary of state of Georgia.” (Maria Bartiromo, 2021-03-16)
Evidence (2021-03-16): Flashback: Major hype retracted WaPo report Trump ordered Ga. to "find the fraud" pic.twitter.com/LAqP7BMmkP [...] "Correction: Two months after publication of this story, the Georgia Secretary of State released an audio recording of President Donald Trump’s December phone call with the state’s top elections investigator," the note read. [...] The story being corrected is separate from another Washington Post article in January about a conversation between Mr Trump and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger.