copenlu/druid huggingface dataset:
Claim: Sri Lankan Government Distributing Free Solar Panels To The General Public !! (Social Media Users, 2024-04-25)
Evidence (2020-01-01): Public policy should take action to expand solar energy in underrated places. [...] This motivation meets the interest of Energy Policy's readers, confirmed from the scientific contribution generated by research Jayaweera, Jayasinghe and Weerasinghe (Jayaweera et al., 2018). This study provides an insight into how domestic PV adoption operates in a small developing country, Sri Lanka. From the perception that in developing countries, only limited researches have been conducted on the viability of micro-generation PV as a mainstream clean energy source for greening the electricity grid. In the Brazilian scenario, this approach is discussed in this article. [...] Local factors affecting the spatial diffusion of residential photovoltaic adoption in Sri Lanka
Claim: Sri Lankan Government Distributing Free Solar Panels To The General Public !! (Social Media Users, 2024-04-25)
Evidence (2020-04-14): Achieving universal access to modern energy is a key pillar of a just and inclusive energy transition aligned with the 1.5°C climate goal. Ensuring access to reliable, affordable and sufficient energy has historically been a key enabler of countries’ industrialisation goals and will continue being so for many emerging economies looking to mechanise farms, build local industries and create jobs in pursuit of socio-economic development objectives. [...] Decentralised renewable energy solutions must be scaled up in a timely manner to reach the 2030 target of universal access. The necessary scale-up will require concerted action by development partners, financing institutions, local and international private sectors, civil society and academia, led by bold, ambitious action by national and local governments. [...] Dedicated programmes and financing incentives will need to be introduced (1) to support the adoption of renewables-based clean cooking solutions adapted to the local context, (2) to raise awareness and (3) to create robust supply chains to support access and maintenance (Figure 4.5).
Claim: Sri Lankan Government Distributing Free Solar Panels To The General Public !! (Social Media Users, 2024-04-25)
Evidence (2023-12-07): The sectors and activities targeted by the incentives are tourism, electricity generation, the textiles industry, manufacturing, the film industry, mining and agriculture.
Claim: Sri Lankan Government Distributing Free Solar Panels To The General Public !! (Social Media Users, 2024-04-25)
Evidence (2023-12-16): This will assist the Sri Lankan Government in achieving its target of 70% renewable energy generation by 2030. "Enabling prosumer participation in achieving Sri Lanka’s 70% renewable energy generation target by 2030." — Tharindu De Silva,Lanka Electricity Company
Claim: Sri Lankan Government Distributing Free Solar Panels To The General Public !! (Social Media Users, 2024-04-25)
Evidence (2018-11-28): Sri Lanka’s Solar Energy Potential: Moving Towards Grid Parity [...] PANEL: Developer Perspectives: Driving Solar Energy in Sri Lanka [...] The Sri Lanka Solar Opportunity: Micro Solar Power Plants
Claim: Sri Lankan Government Distributing Free Solar Panels To The General Public !! (Social Media Users, 2024-04-25)
Evidence (2024-08-22): The key policies include: Decision No. 2068/QD-TTg dated 25 November 2015 provides the following incentives: zero import duty for assets to form the fixed assets of a renewable energy project, and for materials and semi products which are unavailable in the domestic markets; corporate income tax exemption or reduction; land rental exemption or reduction; and government funding for research and technology of pilot projects. Decision No. 11/2017/QD-TTg dated 4 November 2017, as amended by Decision No. 02/2019/QD-TTg dated 8 January 2019, also provides incentives for solar energy projects, which are entitled to an import duty exemption for: goods imported to form the fixed assets of the projects; and materials, semi-products and fuel that are not available locally. Circular No. 02/2019/TT-BCT introduces notable changes to the regulations on wind power projects and the mandatory terms of wind power purchase agreements. Renewable energy projects rely on a number of legal contracts. One central contract is the power purchase agreement (PPA), which governs the sale and purchase of power: See also Key Features of Power Purchase Agreements. Other important contracts include land use agreements, supply agreements, installation agreements, O&M agreements and implementation agreements.
Claim: Is 5G Radiation Harmful And Lethal For Birds And Humans? (Social Media Users, 2022-12-21)
Evidence (2022-12-21): Fact Crescendo found that 5G radiation is not harmful or lethal to birds or humans. The claim in the post is false. Experts have assured that the radiation level in 5G is below the warning level.
Claim: Is 5G Radiation Harmful And Lethal For Birds And Humans? (Social Media Users, 2022-12-21)
Evidence (2021-03-16): The increased use of radiofrequency (RF) fields above 6 GHz, particularly for the 5 G mobile phone network, has given rise to public concern about any possible adverse effects to human health. Public exposure to RF fields from 5 G and other sources is below the human exposure limits specified by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). This state-of-the science review examined the research into the biological and health effects of RF fields above 6 GHz at exposure levels below the ICNIRP occupational limits. The review included 107 experimental studies that investigated various bioeffects including genotoxicity, cell proliferation, gene expression, cell signalling, membrane function and other effects. Reported bioeffects were generally not independently replicated and the majority of the studies employed low quality methods of exposure assessment and control. Effects due to heating from high RF energy deposition cannot be excluded from many of the results. The review also included 31 epidemiological studies that investigated exposure to radar, which uses RF fields above 6 GHz similar to 5 G. The epidemiological studies showed little evidence of health effects including cancer at different sites, effects on reproduction and other diseases. This review showed no confirmed evidence that low-level RF fields above 6 GHz such as those used by the 5 G network are hazardous to human health. Future experimental studies should improve the experimental design with particular attention to dosimetry and temperature control. Future epidemiological studies should continue to monitor long-term health effects in the population related to wireless telecommunications.
Claim: Is 5G Radiation Harmful And Lethal For Birds And Humans? (Social Media Users, 2022-12-21)
Evidence (2020-03-11): 5G judged safe by scientists but faces tougher radiation rules - Published 5G phones are to be subject to tougher radiation limits. [...] "Twenty years of research should reassure people there are no established health risks from their mobile devices or 5G antennas," said its chief regulatory officer John Giusti. A number of campaign groups have been lobbying for even tighter rules, claiming that the higher frequencies used for 5G are dangerous.
Claim: Is 5G Radiation Harmful And Lethal For Birds And Humans? (Social Media Users, 2022-12-21)
Evidence (2020-04-15): The upcoming fifth generation of mobile networks, 5G, will use higher frequency radio waves than its predecessor, 4G. The new 5G will enable nearly 20 times faster data transfer than 4G. [...] On the safer side of the spectrum, infrared radiation is lower frequency than visible light, microwaves even lower, and radio communication waves lower still – meaning less energy, and less potential to cause harm. 5G radio waves will have a maximum frequency of 86GHz, which is within the radio spectrum and is hence considered safe. Scientists have stated that the link between 5G and the coronavirus outbreak is "complete rubbish" and biologically impossible.
Claim: Is 5G Radiation Harmful And Lethal For Birds And Humans? (Social Media Users, 2022-12-21)
Evidence (2019-08-28): analysis 5G radiation health risks have been hyped, but Dr Karl explains why you don't need to worry [...] Opponents of 5G have made all sorts of alarming claims. It's killing birds! It's a weapon used by the military! It's going to trigger a cancer epidemic! [...] One reason for the health concerns about 5G is the fact that some electromagnetic waves can damage atoms.
Claim: Is 5G Radiation Harmful And Lethal For Birds And Humans? (Social Media Users, 2022-12-21)
Evidence (2019-10-07): Ever since we’ve had mobile phones, there have been concerns about their negative health effects. In most areas, the 5G debate is a continuation of all of this, which is logical. The radiation 5G emits will largely be the same as it was for 4G, 3G and 2G before, except for one area: millimetre waves. [...] Until now the EU has funded some research on electromagnetic radiation, but currently there is no EU project focusing on the health effects of 5G. So if we aren’t certain about 5G’s health effects, shouldn’t we just ban it until we are and apply the precautionary principle? Not according to both experts.
Claim: Is 5G Radiation Harmful And Lethal For Birds And Humans? (Social Media Users, 2022-12-21)
Evidence (2022-04-20): "The limits are based on the frequency of the device, meaning that 5G has a different limit than other technologies," an agency spokesperson wrote in an email. "As part of our commitment to protecting the public health, the FDA has reviewed, and will continue to review, many sources of scientific and medical evidence related to the possibility of adverse health effects from radiofrequency energy exposure in both humans and animals and will continue to do so as new scientific data are published." [...] According to expert agencies and the studies we have so far, there’s nothing to suggest 5G mmWave — or your 5G network and associated wireless technology — poses a significant health risk, but it’s clear there is more research to be done on the subject. If you’re the type to be cautious, it’s always possible to reduce your overall exposure to RF radiation, as you can with microwave radiation. Try sleeping with your phone away from your bed at night, for example. Not only will it give you peace of mind, but it will also promote a healthier bedtime routine — a win-win for your health. That said, the assumption that radio waves, including millimeter waves, have a negative impact on overall health, has been proven to be incorrect.
Claim: Is 5G Radiation Harmful And Lethal For Birds And Humans? (Social Media Users, 2022-12-21)
Evidence (2020-07-07): Although the expert public has repeatedly warned that the fifth generation of mobile internet is neither killing the living world nor spreading the virus, misinformation about 5G continues to be published in the media and spread on social networks. UNICEF's young reporters recently found an article on the alo.rs web-portal about a young Serbian scientist who claimed that, with the introduction of the 5G network, we would become diabetics, that birds would start dying, and that the whole world would be changed. Using Crowdtangle, we noticed that half a million users were able to see this article on the social network Facebook, which means that articles that are not based on scientific facts tend to be shared very quickly. In this article, a young scientist from Serbia states that the 5G network can have negative consequences on our health and that during his research he did not find a single positive feature of this network, a technology that is actually useful and harmless. He also believes that the reason for the death of birds in the Netherlands is connected to the 5G network. After incorrect allegations about the impact of 5G on birds, a new conspiracy theory emerged – that the 5G network is spreading coronavirus.
Claim: Is 5G Radiation Harmful And Lethal For Birds And Humans? (Social Media Users, 2022-12-21)
Evidence (2023-06-20): Abstract - The rapid development and deployment of 5G technology have raised concerns about its potential ecological impacts, particularly on bird populations. In recent years, there has been a growing body of evidence suggesting that electromagnetic radiation from wireless communications may pose risks to avian species and their ecosystems. The purpose of this research survey paper is to provide a comprehensive review of the current state of knowledge on the potential threats of 5G on bird populations, in order to inform stakeholders and guide future research efforts. Our review is structured around four main themes: (1) the potential impacts of 5G electromagnetic radiation on birds' physiology, behavior, and overall health; (2) the possible consequences of 5G infrastructure development on the loss and fragmentation of bird habitats; (3) the current body of empirical studies investigating the effects of 5G technology on birds; [...] 3. POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF 5G ON BIRDS 3.1. Electromagnetic Radiation and Related Effects 5G, the fifth generation of wireless communication technology, promises faster internet speeds and improved connectivity. However, there are concerns about the potential impacts of 5G on wildlife, particularly birds. In this article, we will explore the potential effects of electromagnetic radiation from 5G on birds and discuss the mechanisms through which these effects may occur. [...] It is important to note that the potential impacts of 5G on birds are still not fully understood, and more research is needed to determine the extent of these effects. As 5G technology continues to be deployed worldwide, it is essential to monitor its impacts on wildlife and take appropriate measures to minimize potential harm.
Claim: Is 5G Radiation Harmful And Lethal For Birds And Humans? (Social Media Users, 2022-12-21)
Evidence (2014-10-08): Radiation: 5G mobile networks and health 27 February 2020 | Q&A5G, or fifth generation, is the latest wireless mobile phone technology, first widely deployed in 2019. 5G is expected to increase performance and a wide range of new applications, including strengthening e-Health (telemedicine, remote surveillance, telesurgery). [...] WHO is conducting a health risk assessment from exposure to radiofrequencies, covering the entire radiofrequency range, including 5G, to be published by 2022. WHO will review scientific evidence related to potential health risks from 5G exposure as the new technology is deployed, and as more public health-related data become available.
Claim: Is 5G Radiation Harmful And Lethal For Birds And Humans? (Social Media Users, 2022-12-21)
Evidence (2020-09-25): Impact of 5G technology on human and animal health 28.2.2020 [...] While 5G networks will certainly offer a much faster internet connection, many are wondering whether the technology poses a health risk. The radiation from 5G mobile phones might be harmful for animals and birds too; for example, high-frequency electromagnetic waves are said to alter insects’ body temperatures and impair their ability to orient themselves. [...] - 1.What is the Commission’s assessment of the dangers that the 5G technology due to be deployed in the EU poses for human and animal health?
Claim: Is 5G Radiation Harmful And Lethal For Birds And Humans? (Social Media Users, 2022-12-21)
Evidence (2024-01-01): Fast 5G networks are supposed to take hold in 2019, as phones, providers and networks all begin to come online. Behind the scenes, studies modelling the absorption patterns of 5G electromagnetic energy in human tissue, authored by Professor Andrew Wood’s Swinburne team, has helped form the basis for international discussions on safety regulation and design. [...] 5G mobile technology promises a ten-fold increase in data transmission rates compared to current 4G networks, which will be achieved by using a higher transmission frequency. The physiological effects of electromagnetic radiation change with frequency, so the advent of 5G triggered a major international review of relevant radiation safety guidelines, for which it’s agreed that there is insufficient data for a meaningful health risk assessment. [...] Moving forward, the team plans to continue to model the bioeffects of 5G electromagnetic radiation. Their plans for future work range from building skin models and biomolecular work on cells using fluorescent dye, to computational simulations that scale up from single cells to humans.
Claim: Is 5G Radiation Harmful And Lethal For Birds And Humans? (Social Media Users, 2022-12-21)
Evidence (2024-09-04): Concerns about the impact of 5G on human health are largely centred around radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF), the part of the spectrum with frequencies between about 20 KHz to 300 GHz. With 5G set to revolutionise everything from communication to industry, understanding its implications is critical. This is where the GOLIAT project, a pioneering research initiative under the Horizon Europe programme, steps in. [...] 5G makes use of non-ionising radiation, specifically RF-EMF below 6 GHz, which is used in everything from mobile phones to Wi-Fi routers. Unlike ionising radiation, RF-EMF does not have enough energy to break chemical bonds in molecules, but its increasingly widespread use raises important questions about the potential effects related to long-term exposure. Particularly vulnerable populations may include young people and workers in industries where 5G is deployed. [...] In a controlled cross-over quasi-experimental design, the University of Bristol will recruit companies where 5G technology is being used. They aim to conduct repeated measurements of both exposure and neuropsychological outcomes before and after 5G implementation, with a control group for comparison. This method will allow researchers to draw robust conclusions about the potential health risks posed by 5G in occupational settings.
Claim: Is 5G Radiation Harmful And Lethal For Birds And Humans? (Social Media Users, 2022-12-21)
Evidence (2020-03-11): 5G judged safe by scientists but faces tougher radiation rules 5G phones are to be subject to tougher radiation limits. [...] "Twenty years of research should reassure people there are no established health risks from their mobile devices or 5G antennas," said its chief regulatory officer John Giusti. A number of campaign groups have been lobbying for even tighter rules, claiming that the higher frequencies used for 5G are dangerous.
Claim: Is 5G Radiation Harmful And Lethal For Birds And Humans? (Social Media Users, 2022-12-21)
Evidence (2022-12-22): It is claimed that 5G radiation is lethal and is the reason behind the death of many birds. [...] Fact Crescendo contacted Digit magazine editor Mithun Mohandas. According to him, "5G radiation does not harm humans, birds or any other creatures. If that would have been the case, then the installation and testing of 5G tower would not have been approved. It has been many years since 5G has been installed in many countries but there are no reports of loss of any lives. People in relatively close quarters may face some problems due to heat. The research on this case is still going on." [...] Fact Crescendo found that 5G radiation is not harmful or lethal to birds or humans. The claim in the post is false. Experts have assured that the radiation level in 5G is below the warning level.
Claim: Is 5G Radiation Harmful And Lethal For Birds And Humans? (Social Media Users, 2022-12-21)
Evidence (2020-11-13): Antenna installation operators using 5G technology will have the same on-going compliance obligations for radiofrequency exposures to wireless devices and installations. Safety of 5G technology [...] Based on the available scientific evidence, there are no health risks from exposure to the low levels of radiofrequency EMF which people are exposed to from cell phones, cell phone towers, antennas and 5G devices.
Claim: Is 5G Radiation Harmful And Lethal For Birds And Humans? (Social Media Users, 2022-12-21)
Evidence (2018-07-01): For submission to the Wireless Radiation and Health special issue of the journal Environmental Research.
Claim: Is 5G Radiation Harmful And Lethal For Birds And Humans? (Social Media Users, 2022-12-21)
Evidence (2023-05-02): These days, the FCC’s laissez-faire approach is sparking resistance. Hundreds of conflicts have erupted across the country, triggered by citizens fearing risks to their health from wireless radiation, harm to their property values, damage to the environment and the destruction of treasured views. Fights are raging from rural Puerto Rico, where protesters have been arrested for blocking roads used by cell-tower-construction crews, to New York City, where a dozen community boards protested the appearance of visually jarring three-story 5G poles on neighborhood sidewalks. In New York, state officials got involved, then a local congressman. Finally, in late April, the furor grew intense enough that the FCC was forced to act; it belatedly ordered a company to halt construction — after more than a hundred poles had been built — and begin the type of reviews that are supposed to be completed before breaking ground. [...] In December 2015, the agency, with the FAA’s concurrence, finally approved a requirement for all new towers over 150 feet to use flashing lights. But the FCC rejected pleas to mandate that the tens of thousands of existing towers be retrofitted. Gehring quietly launched a personal persuasion campaign, emailing tower operators individually with a plea to voluntarily make the shift. Just a third of the tallest towers, the ones most lethal to birds, have been switched over to date.
Claim: Is 5G Radiation Harmful And Lethal For Birds And Humans? (Social Media Users, 2022-12-21)
Evidence (2021-05-10): More research is necessary to determine how 5G specifically affects human tissue. [...] More research is necessary to determine how 5G affects animals, if at all. [...] Currently, there’s no solid evidence that 5G causes negative health effects in humans or animals. Most researchers have studied EMFs in general and found mixed results.
Claim: Is 5G Radiation Harmful And Lethal For Birds And Humans? (Social Media Users, 2022-12-21)
Evidence (2024-09-22): Environmental impact [edit]- 5G kills birds or insects: Radio wave emissions above 10 MHz from cell telephone towers are not known to harm birds.[17] Mass bee deaths that happened in many parts of the world are not related to 5G deployment.[18] [...] - 5G is a weapons system that governments and industries disguise as new technology: Some people likened the 5G radiofrequency transmitters to the US military's directed-energy weapon called Active Denial System (ADS), which was used to heat the surface of targets, such as the skin of targeted human beings. Although both ADS and 5G use radio waves, 5G transmits over a much lower frequency which is safe for humans.[20] Moreover, 5G transmits at a much lower power than ADS. [...] - ^ "No, 5G Radio Waves Do Not Kill Birds. Then what kills?". Audubon. 14 January 2020. Retrieved 10 November 2021.
Claim: Is 5G Radiation Harmful And Lethal For Birds And Humans? (Social Media Users, 2022-12-21)
Evidence (2019-07-14): However, at the levels used for 5G (and earlier mobile technologies) the heating effects are not harmful, says Prof Rodney Croft, an adviser to the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). [...] The frequency range of the 5G signals being introduced is within the non-ionising band of the electromagnetic spectrum and well below those considered harmful by the ICNIRP. "The exposure that 5G will produce has been considered in great depth by ICNIRP, with the restrictions set well below the lowest level of 5G-related radio frequency that has been shown to cause harm," says Prof Croft.