### Consumer Goods Safety Ordinance 《消費品安全條例》

33. Recovery of expenses of enforcement
Where a court or magistrate—
(a) convicts a person of an offence under this Ordinance; or
(b) makes an order under section 31 for the destruction of any consumer goods or the return of the consumer goods for alteration,
the court or magistrate may, in addition to any other order it or he may make as to costs or expenses, order the person convicted or any person having an interest in the destroyed or altered consumer goods to reimburse the Government Chemist for any costs associated with testing the consumer goods and the Commissioner for any expenditure which has been or may be incurred by him—
(i) in connection with any seizure or detention of the consumer goods;
(ii) in purchasing consumer goods for testing by the Government Chemist; or
(iii) in connection with any compliance by the Commissioner with directions given by the court or magistrate for the purposes of any order for the destruction or alteration of the consumer goods.

34. Storage of unsafe goods
(1) An authorized officer may order the person in possession or control of any consumer goods in respect of which the authorized officer has reasonable cause to believe that an offence under this Ordinance has been committed or is being committed to cause the consumer goods, at the person’s expense, to be stored in a place specified by the authorized officer under such conditions as he may impose.
(2) A person shall not remove the consumer goods stored in a specified place in accordance with the order of an authorized officer under subsection (1) from that place unless an authorized officer has authorized in writing the removal of the consumer goods.
(3) A person authorized in writing under subsection (2) to remove any consumer goods from a specified place shall comply with such conditions as may be imposed by the authorized officer on the removal of the consumer goods.

### Consumer Goods Safety Ordinance 《消費品安全條例》

35. Service of notices
(1) A notice or direction required to be served under this Ordinance shall be properly served if—
(a) in the case of an individual, it is delivered to him or, where it cannot conveniently be so delivered, it is—
(i) left at the address at which he ordinarily resides or carries on business or, if such an address is unknown, at his last known address; or
(ii) sent by post to him at any such address;
(b) in the case of—
(i) a company, it is delivered to an officer of the company or, where it cannot conveniently be so delivered, it is left at, or sent by post to, the company’s registered office;
(ii) a non-Hong Kong company within the meaning of the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 622), it is left with, or sent by post to, its authorized representative as defined by section 774(1) of that Ordinance; (Amended 30 of 2004 s. 3; 28 of 2012 ss. 912 & 920)
(c) in the case of a partnership, it is delivered to any partner or where it cannot conveniently be so delivered, it is left at, or sent by post to, the address at which the partnership carries on business;
(d) in the case of a body corporate other than a company or an unincorporated body of persons other than a partnership, it is delivered to an officer of the body, or where it cannot conveniently be so delivered, it is left at, or sent by post to, the address at which the body carries on business.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), every other body corporate other than a company and every unincorporated body of persons not being a partnership shall be deemed to carry on business at its principal office or place of business.
(3) Where a notice or direction is served—
(a) by sending it by post, it shall, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, be deemed to have been served on the 7th day after the day on which it was sent; or
(b) by leaving it at an address referred to in subsection (1)(a)(i), (b)(i) or (ii), (c) or (d), as the case may be, it shall, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, be deemed to have been served on the 7th day after it was so left.

36. (Omitted as spent—E.R. 2 of 2014)

### Organized and Serious Crimes Ordinance 《有組織及嚴重罪行條例》

1. Short title
(1) This Ordinance may be cited as the Organized and Serious Crimes Ordinance.
(2) (Omitted as spent—E.R. 2 of 2014)

### Organized and Serious Crimes Ordinance 《有組織及嚴重罪行條例》

25. Dealing with property known or believed to represent proceeds of indictable offence
(1) Subject to section 25A, a person commits an offence if, knowing or having reasonable grounds to believe that any property in whole or in part directly or indirectly represents any person’s proceeds of an indictable offence, he deals with that property.
(2) In proceedings against a person for an offence under subsection (1), it is a defence to prove that—
(a) he intended to disclose to an authorized officer such knowledge, suspicion or matter as is mentioned in section 25A(1) in relation to the act in contravention of subsection (1) concerned; and
(b) there is reasonable excuse for his failure to make disclosure in accordance with section 25A(2).
(3) A person who commits an offence under subsection (1) is liable—
(a) on conviction upon indictment to a fine of $5,000,000 and to imprisonment for 14 years; or
(b) on summary conviction to a fine of $500,000 and to imprisonment for 3 years.
(4) In this section and section 25A, references to an indictable offence include a reference to conduct which would constitute an indictable offence if it had occurred in Hong Kong.
(Replaced 90 of 1995 s. 22)

### Organized and Serious Crimes Ordinance 《有組織及嚴重罪行條例》

31. Amendment of amount in section 8(4) and Schedules
Subject to the approval of the Legislative Council, the Chief Executive in Council may by order amend the amount specified in section 8(4) and the Schedules.
(Amended 13 of 1999 s. 3)

32. Savings
This Ordinance operates without prejudice to the Drug Trafficking (Recovery of Proceeds) Ordinance (Cap. 405).

36. (Omitted as spent—E.R. 1 of 2017)