original: even if a contribution violates the precise wording of a rule , it might still be a good contribution .
simplifications: even if a contribution violates the wording of a rule , it might be a good contribution . inspite of violating the precise wording of a rule , it could still be a good contributiion . even if a contribution violates the precise wording of a rule , it might still be a good contribution . even if a contribution breaks the precise wording of a rule , it might still be a good contribution . even if a contribution breaks the wording of a rule , it might still be a good contribution . though a contribution tamper with the actual wording of a rule , it might still be a good contribution . even if a contribution violates the precise wording of a rule , it still might be good . even if a contribution disobident the precise wording of a rule , it might still be a good contribution .