original: for example , a shop might give away its stock in its promotion , but producing these goods would still have required the use of scarce resources , so this would not be a free good in an economic sense .
simplifications: for example , a shop might give away its stock in its growth , but producing these goods would still have needed the use of scarce resources , so this would not be a free good in an economic sense . example , a shop might give away its stock in its promotin , but producing these goods would still have required the use of short resources , so this would not be a free goods in an ecomonic sense . for example , a shop might give away its stock in its promotion , but producing these goods would still have required the use of scarce resources , so this would not be a free good in an economic sense for example , a shop might give away its stock in its promotion , but making these goods would still have required the use of rare resources , so this would not be a free good in an economic sense . for example , a shop might give away its stock in its promotion , but producing these goods would still have required the use of rare / not enough resources , so this would not be a free good in a money-based sense . for example , a shop might give away its stock in its promotion ; but producing these goods would still have required the use of scarce resources , so this would not be a free good in an economic sense . a shop could give away its stock to gain business , but if making the goods requires ingredients or items that are hard to come by , this would not be a ideal free good , economically speaking . for example , a shop might give away its stock in its promotion , but making these goods would still have required the use of rare resources , so this would not be a free good in an economic sense .