Question: What did Britain expand with its economic power?
About the article "Napoleonic Wars", section "Financing the war".

Candidate passages:
Critical to British success in confronting Napoleon was its superior economic situation.
It was able to mobilize the nation’s industrial and financial resources and apply them to defeating France.
With a population of 16 million Britain was barely half the size of France with 30 million.
In terms of soldiers the French numerical advantage was offset by British subsidies that paid for a large proportion of the Austrian and Russian soldiers, peaking at about 450,000 in 1813.
Most important, the British national output remained strong.
Textiles and iron grew sharply.
Iron production expanded as demand for cannon and munitions was insatiable.
Agricultural prices soared--it was a golden age for agriculture even as food shortages appeared here and there.
There were riots in Cornwall, Devon, and Somerset during the food shortages of 1800-01.
Mobs forced merchants to hand over their stocks, as the food was distributed to the hungry by popular committees.
Wells concludes that the disturbances indicate deep social grievances that extended far beyond the immediate food shortages.
Overall, however, crop production grew 50% between 1795 and 1815.
The system of smuggling finished products into the continent undermined French efforts to ruin the British economy by cutting off markets.
The well-organized business sector channeled products into what the military needed.
Not only did British cloth provide for British uniforms, it clothed the allies as well and indeed the French soldiers too.
Britain used its economic power to expand the Royal Navy, doubling the number of frigates and increasing the number of large ships of the line by 50%, while increasing the roster of sailors from 15,000 to 133,000 in eight years after the war began in 1793.
France, meanwhile, saw its navy shrink by more than half.
The British budget in 1814 reached £66 million, including £10 million for the Navy, £40 million for the Army, £10 million for the Allies, and £38 million as interest on the national debt.
The national debt soared to £679 million, more than double the GDP.
It was willingly supported by hundreds of thousands of investors and tax payers, despite the higher taxes on land and a new income tax..
The whole cost of the war came to £831 million.
By contrast the French financial system was inadequate and Napoleon’s forces had to rely in part on requisitions from conquered lands.  
A key element in British success was its ability to mobilize the nation's industrial and financial resources and apply them to defeating France.
With a population of 16 million Britain was barely half the size of France with 30 million.
In terms of soldiers the French advantage was offset by British subsidies that paid for a large proportion of the Austrian and Russian soldiers, peaking at about 450,000 men in 1813.
By the terms of the Anglo-Russian agreement of 1803, Britain paid a subsidy of ₤1.5 million pounds for every 100,000 Russian soldiers in the field.
Most important, the British national output remained strong and the well-organized business sector channeled products into what the military needed.
Britain used its economic power to expand the Royal Navy, doubling the number of frigates and increasing the number of large ships of the line by 50%, while increasing the roster of sailors from 15,000 to 133,000 in eight years after the war began in 1793.
France, meanwhile, saw its navy shrink by more than half.
The system of smuggling finished products into the continent undermined French efforts to ruin the British economy by cutting off markets.
Subsidies to Russia and Austria kept them in the war.
The British budget in 1814 reached £66,000,000, including £10 million for the Royal Navy, £40 million for the army, £10 million for the allies, and £38 million as interest on the national debt.
The national debt soared to £679 million, more than double the GDP.
It was willingly supported by hundreds of thousands of investors and tax payers, despite the higher taxes on land and a new income tax.
The whole cost of the war came to £831 million.
By contrast the French financial system was inadequate and Napoleon's forces had to rely in part on requisitions from conquered lands.
Pitt was an expert in finance and served as Chancellor of the Exchequer.
Critical to his success in confronting Napoleon was using Britain's superior economic resources.
He was able to mobilize the nation's industrial and financial resources and apply them to defeating France.
With a population of 16 million Britain was barely half the size of France with 30 million.
In terms of soldiers the French numerical advantage was offset by British subsidies that paid for a large proportion of the Austrian and Russian soldiers, peaking at about 450,000 in 1813.
Most important, the British national output remained strong and the well-organized business sector channeled products into what the military needed.
Britain used its economic power to expand the Royal Navy, doubling the number of frigates and increasing the number of large ships of the line by 50%, while increasing the roster of sailors from 15,000 to 133,000 in eight years after the war began in 1793.
France, meanwhile, saw its navy shrink by more than half.
The system of smuggling finished products into the continent undermined French efforts to ruin the British economy by cutting off markets.
By 1814, the budget that Pitt in his last years had largely shaped, had expanded to £66 million, including £10 million for the Navy, £40 million for the Army, £10 million for the Allies, and £38 million as interest on the national debt.
The national debt soared to £679 million, more than double the GDP.
It was willingly supported by hundreds of thousands of investors and tax payers, despite the higher taxes on land and a new income tax.
The whole cost of the war came to £831 million.
By contrast the French financial system was inadequate and Napoleon's forces had to rely in part on requisitions from conquered lands. 
In 1982, in the middle of the Latin American debt crisis it created Sonric's as a way to expand its product line with candies and as a response to lowered demand because of the contraction of economic power.
The brand is known because of its mascot, a wizard (known as El Maguito Sonrics) and it's pretty popular among kids.
The brand was so successful that it later expanded to other markets that did not fit well in Sonric's' such as dry powder mixes and flavored water, so it was decided to create Alegro Internacional, a new division of Pepsico to fit these. 
Wilson was astonished by Smith's actions, and found the timing of the declaration to coincide with the Armistice Day silence deeply insulting.
Describing Salisbury as "hell-bent on illegal self-destroying", the British Prime Minister, supported in the Commons by the Liberals and most Conservatives, called on Rhodesians to ignore the post-UDI government.
Within hours of UDI, the UN General Assembly passed a condemnatory resolution, by 107-to-two—South Africa and Portugal voted against, and France abstained—decrying Rhodesia's actions and calling on Britain to end "the rebellion by the unlawful authorities in Salisbury".
The UN Security Council the next day adopted Resolution 216, which denounced the declaration of independence as illegal and racist, and called on all states to refuse recognition and assistance to the Rhodesian government.
Security Council Resolution 217, following on 20 November, condemned UDI as an illegitimate "usurpation of power by a racist settler minority", and called on nations neither to recognise what it deemed "this illegal authority" nor to entertain diplomatic or economic relations with it.
Both of these measures were adopted by ten votes to none with France abstaining.
Black nationalists in Rhodesia and their overseas supporters, prominently the OAU, clamoured for Britain to remove Smith's government with a military invasion, but Britain dismissed this option because of various logistical issues, the risk of provoking a pre-emptive Rhodesian strike on Zambia, and the psychological problems that were likely to accompany any confrontation between British and Rhodesian troops in what Smith said would be a "fratricidal war".
Wilson instead resolved to end the Rhodesian rebellion through economic sanctions; these principally comprised the expulsion of Rhodesia from the Sterling area, a ban on the import of Rhodesian sugar, tobacco, chrome and other goods, and an oil boycott of Rhodesia.
When the Rhodesians continued to receive oil, Wilson attempted to directly cut off their main supply lines, namely the Portuguese Mozambican ports at Beira and Lourenço Marques, by posting a Royal Navy squadron to the Mozambique Channel in March 1966.
This blockade, the Beira Patrol, was endorsed the following month by UN Security Council Resolution 221.
The United Nations proceeded to institute the first mandatory trade sanctions in its history with Security Council Resolutions 232 (December 1966) and 253 (April 1968), which required member states to cease all trade and economic links with Rhodesia.
Wilson predicted in January 1966 that the various boycotts would force Smith to give in "within a matter of weeks rather than months", but the British and UN sanctions had little effect on Rhodesia, largely because South Africa and Portugal went on trading with the breakaway colony, providing it with oil and other key resources.
Clandestine trade with other nations also continued, initially at a reduced level (in what Salisbury referred to as "sanction-busting"), and the diminished presence of foreign competitors helped domestic industries to slowly mature and expand.
Rhodesia thus avoided the economic collapse predicted by Wilson and gradually became more self-sufficient.
The Rhodesian government set up a string of front holding companies in Switzerland, Luxembourg and Liechtenstein to help keep trade open, with some success; goods that had previously been imported from Britain were replaced by Japanese, French and West German equivalents.
Even many OAU states, while bombarding Rhodesia with vitriol, continued importing Rhodesian food and other products.
The United States created a formal exception in its embargo with the Byrd Amendment of 1971, under which the U.S. replaced its import of chrome from the Soviet Union with Rhodesian chrome ore.
This breach of the UN sanctions, passed by the U.S. Congress on the back of anti-communist Cold War considerations, was warmly welcomed by Southern white supremacists; it aided the Rhodesian economy until 1977, when the newly elected President Jimmy Carter successfully pushed Congress to repeal it.