Question: What are some arguments that debunk astrology?
About the article "Astrology", section "Ancient objections".

Candidate passages:
Inspired by the author's web site, "Bad Astronomy," the book attempts to explore twenty-four common astronomical fallacies and explain the scientific consensus concerning these topics within the field of astronomy.
The book explains and corrects many ideas relating to space that, according to Plait, are mistaken but nevertheless often portrayed in popular movies.
Plait also dedicates much of the book to debunking the idea of a Moon landing hoax and explains why astrology should not be taken seriously.
A part of the book describes the Moon's tidal effects and explains the Coriolis effect, why the sky is blue, the Big Bang and other related topics.
Many of the book's topics and arguments also are found on Plait's page at the "Slate" magazine blog site, but Plait explores them in greater depth in the book.
He states that the book is intended to debunk popular myths and also to describe science in an easily comprehensible way. 
Some of the practices of astrology were contested on theological grounds by medieval Muslim astronomers such as Al-Farabi (Alpharabius), Ibn al-Haytham (Alhazen) and Avicenna.
They said that the methods of astrologers conflicted with orthodox religious views of Islamic scholars, by suggesting that the Will of God can be known and predicted in advance.
For example, Avicenna's 'Refutation against astrology', "Risāla fī ibṭāl aḥkām al-nojūm", argues against the practice of astrology while supporting the principle that planets may act as agents of divine causation.
Avicenna considered that the movement of the planets influenced life on earth in a deterministic way, but argued against the possibility of determining the exact influence of the stars.
Essentially, Avicenna did not deny the core dogma of astrology, but denied our ability to understand it to the extent that precise and fatalistic predictions could be made from it.
Ibn Qayyim Al-Jawziyya (1292–1350), in his "Miftah Dar al-SaCadah", also used physical arguments in astronomy to question the practice of judicial astrology.
He recognized that the stars are much larger than the planets, and argued: 
Astrology is not specifically mentioned in the Torah, but there are two commandments which have been used by some authorities as a basis to forbid the practice.
These commandments are understood by some rabbinic authorities as forbidding astrology, while others limit these "mitzvot" to other forms of soothsaying, and thus view astrology as permissible.
In the Hebrew Bible the prophets scoffed at "star-gazers" ("hoverei ha-shamayim") in and .
Astrologers from Babylon were called "Kasdim/Kasdin" (Chaldeans) in the Book of Daniel.
In rabbinic literature, the term "Chaldeans" later was often used as a synonym with those who practiced astrology.
Some historians hold that astrology slowly made its way into the Jewish community through syncretism with ancient Hellenistic culture.
The Sibylline oracles praise the Jewish nation because it "does not meditate on the prophecies of the fortune-tellers, magicians, and conjurers, nor practice Astrology, nor seek the oracles of the Chaldeans in the stars" (iii.
227); although the author of the "Encyclopaedia Judaica" article on astrology holds that this view is mistaken.
The early historian Josephus censures the people for ignoring what he thought were signs foreshadowing the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem. 
Asteroids in astrology are used by some astrologers in a similar way to the planets.
Asteroids are planetoids that orbit the Sun between Mars and Jupiter, and are not to be confused with centaurs or trans-Neptunian objects.
The asteroids are relatively new to astrology, having only been discovered in the 19th century.
However, some of them (especially the largest of them), are believed by some astrologers to influence human affairs.
Still though, they are often ignored within mainstream systems of astrology, especially in more traditional astrology systems like Vedic astrology or Hellenistic astrology.
Their use has become significant to a few Western astrologers yet still only a minority of astrologers use the asteroids in chart interpretation. 
On occasion, the Tanners have publicly challenged critics of Mormonism and earned praise from some LDS scholars.
For instance, the historian Daniel C. Peterson, chairman of Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies (FARMS) at Brigham Young University, suggested the Tanners' willingness to debunk false documents regardless of their content was a sign of integrity:"There are some anti-Mormons out there that I hold in contempt.
They're demagogic.
They spread hatred and strife and disharmony.
I don't see the Tanners in that way.
"The Tanners were among the first public critics of the forger (and later, murderer) Mark Hofmann.
Though Hofmann's "discoveries" of important Mormon documents appeared to bolster the Tanners' arguments, by early 1984 Jerald Tanner had concluded there was significant doubt as to the Salamander Letter's authenticity.
"the astonishment of a community of scholars, historians and students, [he published an attack on the so-called Salamander Letter."
By late 1984, Jerald Tanner questioned the authenticity of most if not all of Hofmann's "discoveries," based in large part on their undocumented provenance.
The Tanners have debunked what they characterize as misrepresentations of the LDS Church by Ed Decker, a Christian evangelist.
They criticized his film "The God Makers II" despite their involvement in his earlier film, "The God Makers".