Question: what rating did Entertainment Weekly give to the first episode of Nurse Jackie
About the article "Nurse Jackie", section "Critical reception".

Candidate passages:
Critical reception.
The premiere of "Nurse Jackie" was met with generally positive reviews from critics.
"Entertainment Weekly" gave the first episode a B+, stating "Edie Falco brings a genial forcefulness to Nurse Jackie."
"New York" magazine called the Showtime series "smart, acrid, alternately sharp and sentimental" and "the best series yet in the cable channel’s ongoing meditation on the nature of addiction ... and the setting for a truly breakthrough female character".
James Poniewozik from "Time" magazine ranked Nurse Jackie's episode "Tiny Bubbles" (106) as 5th on his "Top 10 Episodes of 2009" list.
Reception was not entirely positive, with "Variety" noting, "The series increasingly feels like all style and limited substance – a star showcase that's less 'triumphant return' than 'Nice to have you back, but...'"
Hillary Busis of Entertainment Weekly reviews the episode.
Sara Brady of Television Without Pity reviews the episode and gives it a C rating. 
When "The Stake Out" was first broadcast on May 31, 1990, the episode attracted a Nielsen rating of 16.2/24, meaning that 16.2% of American households watched the episode, and that 24% of all televisions in use at the time were tuned into it.
When the episode was first repeated, on December 2, 1992, a special introductory film was made featuring Louis-Dreyfus and Seinfeld, in which they stated that this episode was the first one they did together.
Strictly speaking, though, it was just the first episode broadcast — in terms of production order, "Male Unbonding" was the first episode in which the two characters both appeared.
The episode was nominated for a Writers Guild Award in 1991.
Holly E. Ordway for "DVD Talk Review" commented positively on not just this episode, but the whole of the first season, saying, "What's not to like about an episode like 'The Stakeout,' in which (among other things) we are witness to the invention of George's alter ego, Art Vandelay (and his import/export business)?"
Mary Kay Shilling and Mike Flaherty of "Entertainment Weekly" also liked the episode but had some doubts, saying it was, "A painfully realistic take on the lovers-to-friends transition that should have been more comically fruitful.
"However, some reviews of the episode were critical, both now and at the time.
When first broadcast, Matt Roush from "USA Today" wrote: "Lacking much in the way of attitude, the show seems obsolete and irrelevant.
What it boils down to is that "Seinfeld" is a mayonnaise clown in the world that requires a little horseradish.
"Colin Jacobson for "DVD Movie Guide" criticized the writing, saying, "the show's rather bland.
It provides the occasional chuckle, but the characters aren't formed yet, and that makes the program ring false.
The ending reconciliation between Jerry and Elaine causes particular problems; it doesn't turn sappy, but it comes too close for "Seinfeld"."
"Anasazi" premiered on the Fox network on , and was first broadcast in the United Kingdom on BBC Two on .
This episode earned a Nielsen rating of 10.1, with a 18 share, meaning that roughly 10.1 percent of all television-equipped households, and 18 percent of households watching television, were tuned in to the episode.
It was viewed by 9.6 million households.
In a retrospective of the second season in "Entertainment Weekly", "Anasazi" was rated an A, being described as "mind-blowing if frustrating", with it being noted that the episode "made fans want to fast-forward through summer."
Writing the A.V.
Club, Zack Handlen rated the episode an A-, noting that the episode "has a lot of really strong moments" and praising Duchovny's acting.
However, he felt that the episode marked the point at which the series' overarching mythology would begin to lose focus, explaining that "it's troubling that instead of answering any big issues here ... the show only gives us new directions".
Chris Carter said of the episode, "I'm proud of the way it came together, what it did for the series, and the overwhelmingly positive response it has gotten.
I'm very pleased beginning season three with where this episode put us—which is that it posed more questions than it answered."
He later said in 2005 that the episode brought a lot of interest to the show due to the apparent death of agent Mulder.
The episode, along with both other parts of the story arc, were listed concurrently as the second-best episode of the series by Den of Geek's Nina Sordi.
Sordi noted that the plotline "laid the groundwork for the mythology arc for the rest of the series", adding that it "brought much more significance to what is to come". 
"Shadows" premiered on the Fox network on October 22, 1993, and was first broadcast in the United Kingdom on BBC Two on October 24, 1994.
The episode earned a Nielsen household rating of 5.9 with an 11 share—meaning that in the US, 5.9 percent of television-equipped households, and 11 percent of all households actively watching television, were watching the program.
It was viewed by 5.6 million households.
In a retrospective of the first season in "Entertainment Weekly", "Shadows" was rated a C+, with the episode being called "exceedingly awkward", while the political context was seen as a weak point.
Keith Phipps, writing for "The A.V.
Club", had mixed feeling about the episode, rating it a C+.
He felt that the episode's plot worked well, though the supernatural elements seemed "a little corny".
Matt Haigh, writing for Den of Geek, was more positive about the episode, calling it "fun viewing" and feeling that "with characters we could care about and a far more rounded plot, this proved one of the better episodes so far.
I still wouldn’t call it a particularly brilliant one, though, either".
Co-writer James Wong felt that the changes he was asked to make to the script led to "Shadows" turning out to be "an average episode", although he felt "the director did a good job with it".
His partner Glen Morgan had a similar opinion, calling it "a little too ordinary, like you have seen it before, which is exactly what the network wanted at the time.
Chris Carter had a more positive view of the episode, calling it "very well done, really great effects, and more of a meat-and-potatoes kind of story.
An FBI sting and a good mystery that Mulder and Scully investigate.
Overall, a really solid episode."
The plot for "Shadows" was also adapted as a novel for young adults in 2000 by Ellen Steiber, under the title "Haunted".