Question: Why isn't it possible to describe the battle without any dispute?
About the article "Battle of Hastings", section "Background and location".

Candidate passages:
The mention of the "battle wagons" is very probably an anachronism, they were employed, without any success, years before the Battle of Legnano of 1176 took place, by a "Mastro Guitelmo" a milanese Guild-master and magistrate in a previous battle fought in the lands between Rho and Legnano in 1160 AD.
It is possible that the chronicler was mixing facts as their effective use at Legnano isn't mentioned elsewhere, it may also be a rhetorical device intended by him to recreate the appearance of the traditional trinitarian model of a "Holy Venture". 
Banti's syndrome (also known as Banti's disease) is a chronic congestive enlargement of the spleen resulting in premature destruction of the red blood cells by the spleen.
However, the term Banti's syndrome is a term that was used "in the past" (but isn't any longer) to describe patients with splenomegaly, hypersplenism and portal hypertension without cirrhosis and without occlusion of the portal venous system.
It is named for Guido Banti. 
 "Could the civilization be destroyed for ever?
No it isn't.
It's transformed.
This is the motif I wanted to highlight through this film."
"Without me, Titash couldn't be possible.
Titash was my dream."
A dispute board or dispute review board (DRB) or dispute adjudication board (DAB) is a 'job-site' dispute adjudication process, typically comprising three independent and impartial persons selected by the contracting parties.
The significant difference between Dispute Review Boards and most other Alternate Dispute Review techniques (and possibly the reason why or Dispute Review Boards have had such success in recent years) is that the Dispute Review Board is appointed at the commencement of a project before any disputes arise and, by undertaking regular visits to the site, is actively involved throughout the project (and possibly any agreed period thereafter).
A Dispute Board becomes a part of the project administration and thereby can influence, during the contract period, the performance of the contracting parties.
It has ‘real-time’ value.
The idea behind a standing Dispute Resolution Board is that it may be called upon early in the evolution of any dispute which cannot be resolved by the parties and be asked to publish decisions or recommendations on how the matters in issue should be settled.
It is usual (but not compulsory) that an opportunity remains for the matter to be referred to arbitration or to the courts if the Dispute Review Board's decision does not find acceptance by the parties.
Thus a Dispute Resolution Board may be likened to the United Kingdom’s adjudication process, either under statutory-compliant contracts or under the regime established by statute itself .
What a Dispute Review Board does that United Kingdom statutory adjudication does not do is to provide a regular and continuing forum for discussion of difficult or contentious matters, to identify ways forward by acting in an informal capacity and to create valuable opportunities for the parties to avoid disputes by keeping proactive communication alive.
Another aspect, which is less often discussed, is that by establishing a Dispute Board from the inception of the project the Dispute Board members become part of the project team and are thought of in a different fashion and because of their “hands on” approach can be trusted to be fair and impartial and their advise respected and taken more readily than would a third party or stranger to the project.
The terms Dispute Board or Dispute Review Board are generic terms and include (a) the Dispute Review Board (DRB) which is a device that originated in the USA and provides non-binding recommendations); (b) the Dispute Adjudication Board (DAB) which is a device emerging from the earlier USA model, but which provides a decision that has interim-binding force); and (c) the Combined Dispute Board (CDB), which is a hybrid of Dispute Review Boards and Dispute Adjudication Boards which was created by the International Chamber of Commerce in 2004.
Various other terms have been used such as Dispute Settlement Panel, Dispute Mediation Board, Dispute Avoidance Panel and Dispute Conciliation Panel.
Fundamentally these different varieties of Dispute Review devices are the same, each providing early adjudication based on the contractual bargain between the parties.
A Dispute Review Board is a creature of contract; the parties establish and empower a Dispute Review Board with jurisdiction to hear and advise on the resolution of disputes.
Within the United Kingdom it is entirely possible for the contracting parties to establish a Dispute Review Board to adjudicate construction contract disputes within the statutory requirement for adjudication .
As yet, there are no statutory requirements for Dispute Review Boards to be established to adjudicate disputes under construction contracts.
While the origins of Dispute Review Boards are found in the construction industry, their ambit is far wider than construction and Dispute Review Boards are now found in the financial services industry, the Maritime Industry, long-term concession projects, operational and maintenance contracts.
The scope for Dispute Review Boards is substantial.
The emergence of the International Chamber of Commerce as an active supporter of Dispute Boards, as well as the Dispute Board Federation and the Dispute Resolution Board Foundation, makes it highly probable that dispute boards will be established in a range of industries that, until now, have not used adjudication to any great extent. 
Intangibility is used in marketing to describe the inability to assess the value gained from engaging in an activity using any tangible evidence.
It is often used to describe services where there isn't a tangible product that the customer can purchase, that can be seen, tasted or touched.
Other key characteristics of services include perishability, inseparability and variability.