Question: What year was the case settled?
About the article "Person of interest", section ""Hatfill v. Ashcroft"".

Candidate passages:
In the late 1990s Apple successfully sued a John Doe from AppleInsider's boards with the username "Worker Bee" for revealing information on what would eventually become the Apple Pro Mouse.
It was a rare case of Apple following through on threats of a suit.
The case was settled out of court. 
The most recent major case of CPIL is "Shames v. Hertz," an antitrust case against all 7 of the airport rental car companies operating in California, and the California Travel and Tourism Commission (CTTC), a state agency controlled by the tourism industry.
The case challenged two airport rental car charges that 2006 legislation allowed the industry to “itemize” on consumer bills.
The case alleges that instead of “itemizing” the charges, they were “added on” to the previous charges on every subsequent bill, effective on January 1, 2007 when the legislation took effect, with the CTTC assisting in the horizontal price fix.
The case was initiated and litigated by CPIL, with three antitrust firms brought into the case.
It went to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal on an important legal issue pertaining to legislative intent and agency liability, and which upheld the CPIL position – reversing the trial court dismissal of the CTTC from the case.
The case was settled in 2013, with a court order stopping what started as a $90 million a year overcharge to consumers, awarding 250,000 consumers as much or more than the overcharge they suffered, and subjecting the CTTC to the Open Meetings Act it had allegedly violated repeatedly. 
In 1999 the LDS Church sued the Tanners for internet linking from their website to the copyrighted "Church Handbook of Instructions."
The lawsuit was settled out of court before an appeals court could rule on what observers described as a potentially landmark case concerning internet linking. 
Gutnick sued Dow Jones and Company for defamation regarding an article published about him in "Barron's Online" in the year 2000.
It was one of the first international legal cases involving defamation on the internet.
The case was highly controversial and the subject of much commentary from legal analysts.
The case was appealed by the author, William Alpert, to the UN under the right of direct petition for individuals.
In the teeth of that application prepared by Geoffrey Robertson QC, Tim Robertson SC, London based Human Rights lawyer, Mark Stephens (solicitor) and Sydney based lawyer, Paul Reidy the case was settled on 15 November 2004, Dow Jones settled the case, agreeing to pay Gutnick some of his legal fees. 
Josephine Pullare Terranova (April 21, 1889, San Stefano, Sicily, Italy – July 16, 1981, Marin County, California) was the defendant in a sensational murder trial in New York City in 1906.
After years of alleged sexual abuse at the hands of her aunt and uncle, the 17-year-old Terranova stabbed the pair to death.
A jury acquitted her in what was widely regarded as an act of jury nullification.
She later settled in the San Francisco Bay Area, allegedly with the financial assistance of William Randolph Hearst.
She died in Marin County, California in 1981, aged 92.
The case was a major national news story at the time, leading to a widespread public debate on the proper role of psychiatric expertise in judicial proceedings.