Question: What was the most important condition of the offer?
About the article "Marshall Plan", section "Initial reactions".

Candidate passages:
Treatment options should be aimed towards the re-establishment of power (consciousness) to affected motor circuits through explanation of the condition, proprioception based physiotherapy and drug treatment.
Finding and treating the root organic cause that has "sparked" the deafferentation within the CNS is also important i.e.
vitamin b12 deficiency, lyme disease, antiphospholipid syndrome and various other non-structural diseases are all common causes.
The importance of the sub-cortex in movement and its relatively recent evolution could be hypothesised as the structural flaw in the “animal who knows and knows that he knows.” Chardin Studies of functional symptoms in other higher mammals thus offer the possibility of further insight into what is a distressing and often long-term, though completely reversible condition. 
What condition are the assets currently in?List/Inventory & Condition of all "assets" within the system, with their unique identifiers.
This could include information such as asset owner, age, estimate of remaining life etc.
This is important to understand what state the assets are currently in. 
Though the concepts are related, there is an important distinction between what appraisers call "assumptions" and what the legal profession and the courts call a "presumption".
In a colloquial sense the two terms are considered synonymous.
Many dictionaries define one term with the other.
In a legal context, a presumption is defined as a conclusion derived from a particular set of facts based on law, rather than probable reasoning.
This can be colloquially interpreted as meaning that when the law makes a presumption, it is assuming a particular condition regardless of reality.
For example, most state laws are written with a "legal limit" for blood-alcohol content, often 0.08%.
It is not a crime to have a certain blood alcohol content; the crime is operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated.
If a driver's blood alcohol content is measured above the legal limit, the law makes a presumption that he is intoxicated, even though a particular person's physiologically might be almost unaffected and his driving abilities might not be impaired.
However, the actual legal effect of a legal presumption is not the legal determination of a fact.
Most presumptions are rebuttable.
What a legal presumption does is relieve one party of having to prove a particular fact once a precedent fact is proven, but most presumptions are rebuttable.
The presumption shifts the burden of proof from one party to the other.
Legal presumptions affecting appraisal conditions are rare, but the appraiser may encounter legal presumptions in the course of an appraisal practice.
For example, in some jurisdictions a public entity has standing to commence an action to condemn private property only if it is able to demonstrate that it could not reach a resolution with the property owner.
Often, the courts make a legal presumption that a resolution cannot be reached if the public entity make an offer in good faith and have that offer rejected.
In this context, the public entity is usually able to demonstrate that it was bargaining in good faith if the offer made was based on an independent appraisal.
This legal presumption is often the basis of why right of way acquisition procedures are set up the way they are.
So an appraiser's entire practice may be the result of a legal presumption.
A legal presumption which may be regarded as an assignment condition might include the legal presumption that in the after condition of a partial taking of real estate, the proposed public improvement is to be constructed expeditiously immediately after the date of taking and not delayed for years or decades as is often the ultimate practical reality.
An appraiser performing and communicating an appraisal under USPAP may estimate value assuming facts and conditions proscribed by a legal presumption, but a determination would have to be made whether the assumption is an extraordinary assumption or hypothetical condition and communicated appropriately as required under USPAP.
However, should the legal context require the communication of results in a manner contrary to USPAP, or if the law requires the valuation of a property under a hypothetical condition in a manner not apparently allowed by USPAP, the appraisal could be provided with the assignment conditions determined by a jurisdictional exception and still be compliant with USPAP. 
Together is a greatest hits album by Reef released in 2003.
It contains most of the band's singles and some non-LP tracks.
Track 14 is a cover of Mickey Newbury's "Just Dropped In (To See What Condition My Condition Was In)". 
 Just Dropped In (To See What Condition My Condition Was In) (The First Edition version)