Question: What year did YenYen make a claim about other countries stealing their food?
About the article "Chilli crab", section "Origins".

Candidate passages:
In October 2008, the Association of Lebanese Industrialists petitioned to the Lebanese Ministry of Economy and Trade to request protected status from the European Commission for hummus as a uniquely Lebanese food, similar to the Protected Geographical Status rights held over regional food items by various European Union countries.
Fadi Abboud, president of the Lebanese Industrialists Association, stated that "Israelis have usurped several Lebanese and oriental products".
According to Abboud, Lebanon exported the first hummus dish in 1959.
As a response, food critic Janna Gur wrote: "The success of certain brands of Israeli hummus abroad may have been what brought about Abboud's anger", leading him to claim that Israel has been "stealing" their country's national dishes, like hummus, falafel, tabbouleh, and baba ghanouj.
Also in response to Abboud's statement, Shooky Galili, an Israeli journalist specialising in food and who writes a blog dedicated to hummus, said that "trying to make a copyright claim over hummus is like claiming for the rights to bread or wine.
[...] Hummus is a centuries old Arab dish — nobody owns it, it belongs to the region".
As of late 2009, the Lebanese Industrialists Association was still "preparing documents and proof" to support its claim. 
One of the main areas where fast food companies face regulation is the advertising of "junk food" to children.
In the United Kingdom, the Children's Food Bill is intended to highly regulate the advertising of such food aimed at children.
Many other countries are looking to introduce strict limitations on fast food advertising as well.
Negotiations between the Food Standards Agency (FSA) and fast food companies were initiated in a collective effort to improve children's diets, though Burger King withdrew from the discussions.
Some organizations have called for the watershed to apply to various unhealthy foods, including fast foods.
In June 2006, the FSA called for laws preventing such food from being advertised on television before 9pm.
They also called for the disassociation of television and film characters from fast food and stopping celebrities from appearing in such advertisements.
The impact of these campaigns is often denied by the fast food companies and the television networks that carry their advertisements.
Some networks have also claimed that tighter regulations would reduce advertising income and that would have a negative impact on the quality of children's programming.
In Sweden, all advertising aimed at the under-12s is banned, including fast food adverts.
Faced with stricter TV, radio and print regulation, many fast food companies have started making use of Internet advertising to reach their customers.
The accuracy of the images of food used by the fast food companies is regularly called into question.
The actual product is often accused of being poorer quality than what is represented in the image, as highlighted in Alphaila.com's Ads vs.
Reality project.
On June 3, 2004 KFC withdrew American television commercials claiming that "fried chicken can, in fact, be part of a healthy diet" after reaching a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission.
Advertising authorities regularly receive complaints about fast food advertisements, with members of the public usually claiming that the wording is misleading.
Not every complaint is upheld.
Between September 11, 2002 and March 24, 2004 the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) in the UK investigated complaints about six McDonald's advertisements, with only two of them being upheld.
The ASA used one of the upheld complaints as a case study.
In 2006 the European Union passed a new law regarding the labeling of foods - any food with a nutritional claim (such as "low fat") must also highlight that it is high in something else (such as "high salt") if that is the case.
While fast food is often not given a traditional label, this may have an impact on advertising.
In November 2006, the Office of Communications (Ofcom) announced that it would ban television advertisements for junk food before, during, and after television programming aimed at under-16s in the United Kingdom.
These regulations were originally outlined in a proposal earlier in the year.
This move has been criticized on both ends of the scale; while the Food and Drink Federation labelled the ban "over the top", others have said the restrictions do not go far enough (particularly due to the fact that soap operas would be exempt from the ban).
On 1 April 2007, junk food advertisements were banned from programs aimed at four to nine-year-olds.
Such advertisements broadcast during programs "aimed at, or which would appeal to," ten to fifteen-year-olds will continue to be phased out over the coming months, with a full ban coming into effect on 1 January 2009.
In Malaysia, fast food advertising during children's programs was outlawed in 2007.
However, it did not stop the fast food companies from advertising their products.
Since the ban, McDonald's no longer advertises Happy Meals on other media except in their restaurants and fast food advertising is mainly broadcast during prime-time (in Malaysia, prime time starts from 8:30 pm to 12:00 am). 
Food crisis.
The G8 registered their deep concern about the current global food crisis, but did not announce tangible or measurable initiatives for tackling it.
According to World Vision the $10 billion pledged since January will make a difference in the short term.
Tearfund see the appointment of a G8 Expert Group to monitor the implementation of food security commitments as a positive step, although the lack of measurable plans adopted means that it is unclear exactly what role this group will play.
Many NGOs report that the G8 did not address the structural causes of the food crisis.
Instead of delivering trade justice, G8 leaders pushed for even more trade liberalisation for developing countries.
The G8 also remained silent on the role of food-price speculation in global markets in making the crisis worse.
They also used only vague words on reducing bio-fuels and addressing climate change. 
Students exchanges are the core activities of EGEA.
They enable small groups from 2 or 3 EGEA entities to visit each other in their countries, learn about culture, explore the habits, nature and many interesting places in visiting countries.
What is most important, they make young geography students getting to know their international peers.
Following the agreement, one entity is hosting the other one.
During the hosting time young people take care of the accommodation, food, and programme.
Later on, the hosting entity becomes the visiting one and repays the visit.
Exchanges are numerously the most attended activities, when taking into consideration number of events taking place every year. 
Plant genetic resources are essential to a sustainable agriculture and food security.
FAO estimates humans have used some 10 000 species for food throughout history.
However, only about 120 cultivated species provide around 90% of food requirements and 4 species (Maize, Wheat, Rice and Potatoes) provide about 60% of human dietary energy for the world's population.
Of the myriad of varieties of these crops developed by farmers over millennia, which form an important part of agricultural biodiversity, more than 75% have been lost in the past 100 years.
Some fear that corporate financial interests might prevent safeguarding of livelihoods, promotion of food security, biodiversity-rich farming under control of local communities, and implementation of Farmers' Rights.
Critics say many of the central issues are unresolved or open to interpretation.
Some of the points raised are:  to what extent will intellectual property rights be allowed on genetic resources in the MLS, within treaty rules: some argue an agreement aiming at open access to genetic resources for food and agriculture should not allow restrictive property rights, and the treaty says in Article 12.3.d that ""Recipients shall not claim any intellectual property or other rights that limit the facilitated access to the plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, or their genetic parts or components, in the form received from the Multilateral System"";  to what extent will farmers and communities be allowed to freely use, exchange, sell and breed the seeds, and what enforcement procedures will be used by national governments to ensure principles of Farmers' Rights will be respected; The mechanism for dispute settlement under the Third Party Beneficiary and the role of FAO.
The first group of 11 projects funded by the treaty was announced during the Third Session of the Governing Body in Tunis in June 2009.
The projects were funded according to criteria established by the Governing Body including regional balance: 5 from Latin America, 5 from Africa and 1 from Asia.
The ranking of the projects was done by a Group of Experts nominated by the 7 regional representatives of the Bureau and the final approval was done by the Bureau on behalf of the Governing Body.
while the whole Brassica family (Cruciferae) including all its sub-species and varieties is in the MLS the total number of food crops and forages and their relatives included in the treaty is very limited.
Soya, sugar cane, oil palm and groundnut are among important crops missing from the list in Annex 1.
The treaty came into force on 29 June 2004 at which time there were more than 54 ratifications by countries.
An article prepared on the occasion of the treaty becoming law is posted at [http://www.ukabc.org/itpgrfa29june2004.htm].
From the entry into force, countries that previously signed are allowed to ratify the treaty, while countries that did not sign the treaty before it came into force can also accede to it.
The instrument of ratification has to be deposited with the Director-General of FAO.