Question: What would cause a personal penalty to be issued?
About the article "Field hockey", section "Dangerous play and raised balls".

Candidate passages:
In an internet text entitled "Death penalty for global warming deniers?
An objective argument...a conservative conclusion" dated 25 October 2012, Parncutt, after declaring his fundamental opposition to the death penalty in all cases including mass murderers such as Anders Behring Breivik, proposed restricting the death penalty to individuals who cause more than one million deaths, and claimed that influential "global warming deniers" could fall into that category if they slow progress toward reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and thereby cause the deaths of millions of future people.
The text included a link to desmogblog's controversial list of climate skeptics.
Parncutt suggested that a panel of scientists should decide whether a given individual had caused more than one million deaths.
Convicts should also have the chance to reprieve to life imprisonment, if they withdraw, publicly repent and commit themselves to "participate significantly and positively over a long period in programs to reduce the effects of global warming (from jail) - using much the same means that were previously used to spread the message of denial".
He continued: "Please note that I am not directly suggesting that the threat of execution be carried out.
I am simply presenting a logical argument" but then finished: "At the end of that process, some global warming deniers would never admit their mistake and as a result they would be executed.
Perhaps that would be the only way to stop the rest of them.
The death penalty would have been justified in terms of the enormous numbers of saved future lives."
He then doubted his argument, saying "People will be saying that Parncutt has finally lost it" - but in the year 2050 "perhaps the Pope would even turn me into a saint".
Parncutt continued that if the death penalty were limited to individuals causing more than one million deaths it might also apply to Popes since the 1980s, whom he claimed to be responsible for millions of AIDS deaths for their failure to change the church's position on contraception in the 1980s and subsequently.
The paper remained on the website of the University of Graz until 24 December 2012.
After several people listed by desmogblog cited the text in their blogs, and some of them threatened to take legal action against Parncutt and the university administration, Parncutt replaced the text by a shorter explanation and then by an unconditional retraction and apology.
University officials ordered the removal of all political texts and issued a statement saying: "The University of Graz is shocked and appalled by the article and rejects its arguments entirely.
The University places considerable importance on respecting all human rights and does not accept inhuman statements.
Furthermore, the University of Graz points out clearly that a personal and individual opinion which is not related to scientific work cannot be tolerated on websites of the University."
Subsequently, a disciplinary process against him was initiated by the university. 
On Usenet, the Usenet Death Penalty (or UDP) is a final penalty that may be issued against Internet service providers or single users who produce too much spam or fail to adhere to Usenet standards.
Messages that fall under the jurisdiction of a Usenet Death Penalty will be cancelled. 
Todd Darren McNair (born August 16, 1965) is a former professional football player and coach.
McNair previously worked for six years as the running backs coach for the USC Trojans football team, until the NCAA issued a one-year show-cause penalty against him as part of sanctions related to the ineligibility of one of his former players, Reggie Bush.
McNair currently has a lawsuit pending against the NCAA for libel, slander, breach of contract and four other alleged offenses.
On January 20, 2013, it was reported that McNair would be hired by the Arizona Cardinals as the running backs coach.
However, on February 1, 2013, McNair said that he would not be joining the team. 
In the Catholic Church, a bishop, priest, or deacon may be "dismissed from the clerical state" as a penalty for certain grave offenses, or by a papal decree granted for grave reasons.
This may be because of a serious criminal conviction, heresy, or similar matter.
A Catholic cleric may also voluntarily request to be laicized for a grave personal reason.
Voluntary requests are by far the most common means of laicization, and the most common reason is to marry: clergy of the Latin Church must be unmarried.
A priest may also seek laicisation voluntarily because he disagrees with major policies or doctrines of the church and wishes to dissociate himself from those policies.
Laicization is sometimes imposed as a punishment (Latin, "ad poenam"), or it may be granted as a favour (Latin, "pro gratia") at the priest's own request.
New regulations issued in 2009 regarding priests who abandon their ministry for more than five years and whose behaviour is a cause of serious scandal have made it easier for bishops to secure laicization of such priests even against the priests' wishes.
In the two years 2011 and 2012, nearly 400 Catholic priests were laicized, with a peak of 260 in 2011, nearly half of the laicizations being imposed as a penalty. 
Article 96: Discriminate against the elderly by preventing or hindering their access to banking facilities, means of transport, the right to hire or by any other means or instrument necessary for the exercise of citizenship by reason of age.
Penalty: imprisonment from 6 months to 1 year and a fine.§ 1: The same penalty who despise, humiliate, belittle or discriminate against the elderly, for any reason.§ 2: The penalty will be increased from 1/3 if the victim is under the care or responsibility of the agent.
Article 97: Failure to assist the elderly, when possible to do so without personal risk, in situations of imminent danger, or refuse, delay or hamper their health care, without cause, or not to ask these cases, the help of public authority.
Penalty: detention of 6 months to 1 year and a fine.
Single Paragraph.
The penalty is increased by half if the omission resulting serious bodily injury, and tripled if death results.
Article 98: Leave the elderly in hospitals, nursing homes, long stay entities, or the like, or do not meet their basic needs, when required by law or court.
Penalty: detention of 6 months to 3 years and fine.
Article 99: Expose to danger the health and wellbeing, physical or mental, the elderly, subjecting him to inhuman or degrading conditions or depriving them of food and care needed when required to do so, or subjecting him to overwork or inadequate.
Penalty: imprisonment from 2 months to 1 year and a fine.§ 1: If the fact results serious bodily injury.
Penalty: imprisonment of 1 to 4 years.§ 2: If death results.
Penalty: imprisonment from 4 to 12 years.
Article 100: Constitutes a crime punishable by imprisonment of 6 months to one 1 year and a fine:I - obstruct someone's access to any public office by reason of age; II - to deny someone because of age, employment or work; III - deny, delay or hamper treatment or fail to provide health care, without cause, the elder; IV - fail to comply, delay or frustrate without due cause, the execution of a court order issued in a civil action to which this Law refers; V - deny, delay or omit the technical data essential to the commencement of civil action object of this Act, when requested by the prosecutor.
Article 101: Failure to comply with, delay or frustrate without due cause, the execution of a court order issued in actions in which it is party or intervener the elderly.
Penalty: imprisonment from 6 months to 1 year and fine.
Article 102: Appropriating or diverting assets, earnings, pension or other income of the elderly, giving them differently from application of its purpose.
Penalty: imprisonment of 1 to 4 years and fine.
Article 103: Denying the host or the elderly to stay as warm, by refusing to grant this authority to the proxy service.
Penalty: detention of 6 months to 1 year and a fine.
Article 104: Hold the magnetic card bank account on benefits, or pension income of the elderly as well as other documents for the purpose of ensuring receipt or recovery of debt.
Penalty: detention of 6 to 2 years and fine.
Article 105: View or vehicle by any means of communication, information or pictures derogatory or insulting the person of aging.
Penalty: detention of 1 to 3 years and fine.
Article 106: Induce elderly without understanding of their acts to grant powers of attorney for asset management or dispose of them.
Penalty: 2 to 4 years.
Article 107: Coerce, in any event, the senior to donate, recruit, test, or grant powers of attorney.
Penalty: imprisonment from 2 to 5 years.
Article 108: Plow notarial act involving elder undiscerning of their acts without proper legal representation.
Penalty: imprisonment from 2 to 4 years.