Question: When did Boutefika promise further constitutional and political reform?
About the article "Algeria", section "Civil War and aftermath".

Candidate passages:
Ludwig Scotty remained a member of the Parliament of Nauru, following the no confidence defeat in Parliament of his Administration in 2007.
Coming as it did only a few months after the landslide victory of his supporters at the polls in August 2007, his relinquishing of office so soon afterwards can be seen in terms of an element of promise and expectations unfilled.
It remained to be seen whether Scotty, who turned 60 in 2008, and whose Administration was replaced by a ministerial team several of whom were many years his junior, would in the future seek a further term of office as President.
His second Administration of 2004 - 2007, however, is increasingly regarded by some observers as one which was characterized by relative stability for the Republic of Nauru in contrast with the political upheavals and crises which occurred before and after this Administration.
It also arguably represented a period when the Nauru electorate and their representatives were appearing to come to terms with being educated into the perceived need for economic austerity measures and the disciplines which coincided with them, and into a broader reflection on improvements in political culture.
In the earlier part of 2008, somewhat of an oblique compliment was being paid to constitutional review process identified with Scotty when both Government and Opposition were claiming it as part of their legacy.
In April 2008 Scotty stood again for the Parliament of Nauru and was reelected to serve as a Member.
In March 2010 former President Scotty intervened the constitutional reform debate.
Mr Scotty doubted whether changes proposed by the current Government of Nauru commanded popular support. 
As of 12 December 2011, the membership of the committee is as follows:Source: Political and Constitutional Reform Committee 
The Junior Constitutional Club was a political London gentlemen's club founded in 1887, and located at 101 Piccadilly.
It was aligned to the Conservative party, with members having to pledge support.
Heavy over-subscription for the Constitutional Club which had opened in 1883 led to the creation of a further mass-membership Conservative club.
By 1890, it was reported by "Whittakers Almanack" to have 10,000 members, making it one of the largest clubs ever, but this level of membership proved to be short-lived; by 1890 its membership had halved to around the 5,500 level, and by 1900 it was still slightly further down, at 5,000.
It had closed by 1904, when its building was taken over by the pro-Tariff Reform United Empire Club. 
Several historians credit the Reform Act 1832 with launching modern democracy in Britain.
G. M. Trevelyan hails 1832 as the watershed moment at which "'the sovereignty of the people' had been established in fact, if not in law".
Sir Erskine May notes that " reformed Parliament was, unquestionably, more liberal and progressive in its policy than the Parliaments of old; more vigorous and active; more susceptible to the influence of public opinion; and more secure in the confidence of the people", but admitted that "grave defects still remained to be considered".
Other historians have taken a far less laudatory view, arguing that genuine democracy began to arise only with the Second Reform Act in 1867, or perhaps even later.
Norman Gash states that "it would be wrong to assume that the political scene in the succeeding generation differed essentially from that of the preceding one".
E. A. Smith proposes, in a similar vein, that "when the dust had settled, the political landscape looked much as it had done before.
Historians have long pointed out that, in 1829–31, it was the Ultra-Tories or "Country Party" which pressed most strongly for Reform, regarding it as a means of weakening Wellington's ministry, which had disappointed them by granting Catholic emancipation and by its economic policies.
Evans (1996) emphasises that the Reform Act "opened a door on a new political world".
Although Grey's intentions were conservative, Evans says, and the 1832 Act gave the aristocracy an additional half-century's control of Parliament, the Act nevertheless did open constitutional questions for further development.
Evans argues it was the 1832 Act, not the later reforms of 1867, 1884, or 1918, that were decisive in bringing representative democracy to Britain.
Evans concludes the Reform Act marked the true beginning of the development of a recognisably modern political system. 
In June 2010, he voted in favour of the government’s 2012 constitutional reform package.