Question: What did Total Film say about the movie Fight Club?
About the article "Fight Club", section "Cultural impact".

Candidate passages:
The film premiered on September 17, 1999 at the Toronto Film Festival.
It also was featured at the Berlin International Film Festival on February 17, 2000.
The film opened in North American limited release on December 29, 1999.
The first week's gross was $384,640 (11 screens) and the total receipts for the run were $50,668,906.
In its widest release the film was featured in 2,148 theaters.
It closed the week of April 14, 2000.
The motion picture was in circulation sixteen weeks.
Roger Ebert, film critic for the "Chicago Sun Times", liked the film and the acting, and wrote, "This is one of Denzel Washington's great performances, on a par with his work in "Malcolm X.
"... Washington as Hurricane Carter is spare, focused, filled with anger and pride...
This is strong stuff, and I was amazed, after feeling some impatience in the earlier reaches of the film, to find myself so deeply absorbed in its second and third acts, until at the end I was blinking at tears.
What affects me emotionally at the movies is never sadness, but goodness.
"Regarding the "fictionalized" aspects of the film, Ebert discussed why that is often the case in films: "Several people have told me dubiously that they heard the movie was 'fictionalized'.
Well, of course it was.
Those who seek the truth about a man from the film of his life might as well seek it from his loving grandmother.
Most biopics, like most grandmothers, see the good in a man and demonize his enemies.
They pass silently over his imprudent romances.
In dramatizing his victories, they simplify them.
And they provide the best roles to the most interesting characters.
If they didn't, we wouldn't pay to see them."
He added, ""The Hurricane" is not a documentary but a parable, in which two lives are saved by the power of the written word.
"Film critic Stephen Holden, writing for "The New York Times", had mixed views of the film but did like the acting.
He wrote, "In telling the story of Mr. Carter's protracted and ultimately successful fight for freedom and justice, "The Hurricane" rides to glory on an astonishing performance by Denzel Washington... That is to say, Mr. Washington leans into an otherwise schlocky movie and slams it out of the ballpark.
If his Hurricane is an inspiring portrait of nobility, it is because the actor never conceals the demons of fury and despair gnawing beneath his character's forcefully articulate surface.
"Holden was forthright about the veracity of the film, writing, "The film is so eager to stir us up that it thinks little of bending the facts for dramatic effect.
Among its most egregious distortions is its depiction of Mr. Carter's 1964 middleweight title match with Joey Giardello.
The movie (which has fine, naturalistic boxing sequences) inaccurately portrays the fight as lost by Carter solely because of the judges' racism.
The taking of such license, of course, adds an extra jolt of drama.
But when these and other distortions and exaggerations are added up, it's worth wondering if that self-congratulatory glow the movie leaves us with has been gotten far too easily and at what cost.
"Currently, the film has an 83% "Fresh" rating at Rotten Tomatoes, based on 113 reviews. 
"Fight Club" was one of the most controversial and talked-about films of the 1990s.
Like other 1999 films "Magnolia", "Being John Malkovich", and "Three Kings", "Fight Club" was recognized as an innovator in cinematic form and style since it exploited new developments in filmmaking technology.
After "Fight Club"s theatrical release, it became more popular via word of mouth, and the positive reception of the DVD established it as a cult film that David Ansen of "Newsweek" conjectured would enjoy "perennial" fame.
The film's success also heightened the profile of the novel's author, Chuck Palahniuk, to global renown.
Following "Fight Club"s release, several fight clubs were reported to have started in the United States.
A "Gentleman's Fight Club" was started in Menlo Park, California in 2000 and had members mostly from the tech industry.
Teens and preteens in Texas, New Jersey, Washington state, and Alaska also initiated fight clubs and posted videos of their fights online, leading authorities to break up the clubs.
In 2006, an unwilling participant from a local high school was injured at a fight club in Arlington, Texas, and the DVD sales of the fight led to the arrest of six teenagers.
An unsanctioned fight club was also started at Princeton University, where matches were held on campus.
The film was suspected of influencing Luke Helder, a college student who planted pipe bombs in mailboxes in 2002.
Helder's goal was to create a smiley pattern on the map of the United States, similar to the scene in "Fight Club" in which a building is vandalized to have a smiley on its exterior.
On July 16, 2009, a 17-year-old who had formed his own fight club in Manhattan was charged with detonating a homemade bomb outside a Starbucks Coffee shop in the Upper East Side in May 2009; the New York City Police Department reported the suspect was trying to emulate "Project Mayhem".
In 2003, "Fight Club" was listed as one of the "50 Best Guy Movies of All Time" by "Men's Journal".
In 2004 and 2006, "Fight Club" was voted by "Empire" readers as the ninth and eighth greatest film of all time, respectively.
"Total Film" ranked "Fight Club" as "The Greatest Film of our Lifetime" in 2007 during the magazine's tenth anniversary.
In 2007, "Premiere" selected Tyler Durden's line, "The first rule of fight club is you do not talk about fight club," as the 27th greatest movie line of all time.
In 2008, readers of "Empire" ranked Tyler Durden first on a list of the 100 Greatest Movie Characters.
"Empire" also identified "Fight Club" as the 10th greatest movie of all time in its 2008 issue "The 500 Greatest Movies of All Time".
In 2010, two viral mash-up videos featuring "Fight Club" were released.
"Ferris Club" was a mash-up of "Fight Club" and the film "Ferris Bueller's Day Off".
It portrayed Ferris as Tyler Durden and Cameron as the narrator, "claiming to see the real psychological truth behind the John Hughes classic".
The second video "Jane Austen's Fight Club" also gained popularity online as a mash-up of "Fight Club"s fighting rules and the characters created by 19th century novelist Jane Austen.
"Kazaam" received extremely negative reviews from film critics and currently holds a 6% "rotten" rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 33 reviews and a 24 out of 100 on Metacritic.
Shaquille O'Neal's performance in the film was considered poor and to date has been referenced in a number of movies, mainly either criticizing his acting or gloating about it.
The film itself was a box office disappointment, making $18.9 million against a $20 million production budget.
O'Neal, however, has not expressed regret for making the film.
In an interview with "GQ" magazine he said, "I was a medium-level juvenile delinquent from Newark who always dreamed about doing a movie.
Someone said, 'Hey, here's $7 million, come in and do this genie movie.'
What am I going to say, no?
So I did it.
"To this date, Paul Michael Glaser has not directed a movie due to negative reviews on his directing. 
Director Mehmet Tanrısever returned to filmmaking after a 20-year break to make the film, stating that, "I first started filmmaking because I wanted to express an idea.
Then many years later I took up filmmaking again for the same reasons.
I think it’s important to keep up efforts like this."
"So, I liquidated my business and spent time making movies.
I ended up making this movie.
""I actually wanted to make this movie 20 years ago, but I came across some spiritual obstacles."
Tanrısever stated in an interview, "One of the screenwriters, Mehmet Uyar, saw Said Nursi in his dream.
The esteemed scholar dismissed our friend, saying: 'Now is not the time.
Don’t you know me?'"
"I believed in the power of these obstacles and decided not to make the movie."
However, he continued, "After 20 years, we decided to try again.
"The film was shot in eight weeks out of a total production time of fourteen weeks and the director, pleased with the result, stated that it, "is one of the top five movies among period dramas shot in Turkey.
In fact, 'Hür Adam' is perhaps the best one.
I look at other period pieces that have been made, and when I compare my movie with them, I would say it is the best.
I know what I did, what I produced.
I cannot be modest about this.
"Ankara Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office launched an investigation into the production following a complaint by lawyer Ömer Ediz Yoruz, who alleged that the film "insults the spiritual personality of Atatürk", which is a criminal offence in Turkey.
Filmmaker Gani Rüzgar Şavata also filed a complaint against the director and screenwriters for "using the screenplay, for which he holds part of the copyright, without his consent". 
The film received generally favorable reviews from critics.
Review aggregation website Rotten Tomatoes gives the film a score of 67% based on reviews from 140 critics.
Metacritic reported the film had an average score of 69/100, based on 32 reviews.
Many critics praised Chiwetel Ejiofor for his performance in the film.
For "Entertainment Weekly", Stephen King wrote that Ejiofor "brings gravity and grace to Terry's moral dilemma.
""Los Angeles Times" film critic Carina Chocano described the film as "tricky and engrossing" and "a contemporary noir with a samurai movie interior."
Chocano wrote, "Ejiofor brings a calm magnetism and a beatific serenity to his roles that have the effect of knocking you flat -- there's something about this guy that's messianic."
While citing Tim Allen's performance as restrained, Chocano wrote "the noir puzzle element is central to the story" and "suffice it to say things get complicated," saying "much of the pleasure is in the surprises.
"Several critics called the story reminiscent of films from earlier decades.
Ruthe Stein of the "San Francisco Chronicle" said the film is "entertaining in a pulpy kind of way, like the fight films of the 1930s and '40s, and more accessible than most of Mamet's movies."
Ty Burr of "The Boston Globe" wrote "What "Redbelt" reminded me of more than anything else was a modern version of a classic film noir, particularly 1950's brilliantly seedy "Night and the City", with its pro-wrestling subplot."
Manohla Dargis of "The New York Times" called it "a satisfying, unexpectedly involving B-movie that owes as much to old Hollywood as to Greek tragedy.
"The ending of the film was criticized by several critics.
Tasha Robinson of "The A.V.
Club" said "The film unravels a bit in the last few moments, amid unanswered story questions and a simplistic climax, but until that moment, "Redbelt" is Mamet's richest film of the decade."
Steven Rea of "The Philadelphia Inquirer" said "One of the problems with the way Mamet resolves Mike's predicament is that it's ridiculously implausible - even in the context of a far-fetched fight story."
Andrew O'Hehir of Salon.com said the final scene "might seem far-fetched on a pay-per-view MMA broadcast."
Film critic James Berardinelli said "The plot is borderline ridiculous and certainly doesn't stand up to close (or even not-so-close) scrutiny, but there's a level of entertainment to be had watching it unfold in all its strangeness," but also said "taken at face value, there's a degree of satisfaction in the way "Redbelt" concludes.
"Regarding the fight scenes in the film, Rea wrote "Mamet is a master of talk, not action" and said ""Redbelt"'s ultimate Ultimate Fight moment feels sorely lacking."
O'Hehir said "the jiu-jitsu scenes are so incoherently shot and edited you can't tell if the fight choreography is any good or not."
Berardinelli wrote "Anyone attending with the expectation that this is going to satisfy a primal desire for wall-to-wall combat will be sadly disappointed.
In "The Weekly Standard", Sonny Bunch wrote that the film's "heart is not in the twists and turns [...] but a careful character study of a man who lives a life based on honor, and the corrupting influence of money."
Bunch said it "takes lack of exposition to a new extreme [...] How does Mamet tell us about Terry's character?
Very subtly.
Throughout the film we get hints about Terry's life [...] Mamet challenges us to figure out for ourselves what's going on in Terry's head.
"The film appeared on some critics' top ten lists of the best films of 2008.
Tasha Robinson of "The A.V.
Club" named it the 4th best film of 2008, and Mike Russell of the "Portland Oregonian" named it the 9th best film of 2008.