Question: What was the population on France in 2013, and how much does it grow per year?
About the article "France", section "Demographics".

Candidate passages:
On the hearth, a fire burns,And in the house it is warm.
And the rabbi is teaching little children,The alphabet.
Refrain:See, children, remember, dear ones,What you learn here;Repeat and repeat yet again,"Komets-alef: o!
"Learn, children, with great enthusiasm.
So I instruct you;He among you who learns Hebrew pronunciation faster -He will receive a flag.
Learn children, don't be afraid,Every beginning is hard;Lucky is the one has learned Torah,What more does a person need?When you grow older, children,You will understand by yourselves,How many tears lie in these letters,And how much lament.
When you, children, will bear the Exile,And will be exhausted,May you derive strength from these letters,Look in at them! 
Extreme functionalists such as Götz Aly believe that the Nazi leadership had nothing to do with initiating the Holocaust and that the entire initiative came from the lower ranks of the German bureaucracy.
This philosophy is what is known as the Bottom-Up Approach of the Holocaust.
Aly has made much of documents from the bureaucracy of the German Government-General of Poland arguing that the population of Poland would have to decrease by 25% to allow the Polish economy to grow.
Criticism centers on the idea that this explanation does not really show why the Nazis would deport Jews from France and the Netherlands to death camps in Poland if it was Poland the Nazis were concerned with, and why the Jews of Poland were targeted instead of the random sample of 25% of the Polish population.
Additional criticism of functionalism points out that Hitler and other Nazi leaders delayed railcars providing supplies to front line troops in the Soviet Union so that Jews could be deported by rail from the USSR to death camps thus demonstrating the pursuit of genocidal policies over pragmatic wartime actions. 
The population density of the invasive lionfish is increasing very quickly, and efforts are underway in several areas to bring it under control.
However, to completely eradicate the lionfish from its new habitats seems unlikely.
A study from 2010 using population modeling used data collected about the known life history of the lionfish inhabiting the Caribbean coral reefs to figure out the best means of eradication.
The study showed that the most effective way to even maintain current lionfish population densities, at least 27% of the invasive adult populations would have to be killed monthly.
The fact that lionfish are able to reproduce monthly throughout the entire year means that this is an effort that "must" be maintained monthly for the maintenance of current population densities.
Even to accomplish these numbers seems unlikely, but as populations of lionfish continue to grow throughout the Caribbean and Western Atlantic, actions are being taken to attempt to control the quickly growing numbers.
In November 2010, the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary began to give out licenses to divers to kill lionfish inside of the sanctuary.
This is the first time this has ever been done for any species in the sanctuary, in a desperate attempt to eradicate the fish.
Rigorous and repeated removal of lionfish from invaded waters will be necessary to establish control on the exponentially expanding population.
Many conservation groups across the Eastern United States are organizing hunting expeditions for "Pterois".
The Environment Education Foundation recently hosted its third ‘lionfish derby’ in Florida, offering more than $3,000 in prize money for dive teams catching the most lionfish.
Community organizations are forming across the country in hopes of halting the ever expanding lionfish population.
Divemasters from Cozumel to the Honduran Bay Islands routinely spear Lionfish during dives, sometimes killing as many as eight in an hour.
Divers at Reef Conservation International's headquarters off Punta Gorda, Belize spear an average of 30 lionfish per dive, with the single diver maximum record being 54 on one dive.
Based on average kills per dive, a professional diver could easily kill 3000 to 4000 Lionfish per year (3 dives per day, 6 days per week, averaging 4+ kills per dive).
Other interest groups, such as NOAA, are setting up events and campaigns that encourage the killing and eating of the fish.
Many people are wary of the idea of eating a venomous fish, but when properly filleted the fish is safe to eat.
Encouraging the consumption of lionfish could not only help to maintain a reasonable population density, but also provide an alternative fishing source to other overfished populations, such as grouper and snapper.
The Reef Environmental Education Foundation has even prepared a cookbook to help educate restaurant chefs on how they can incorporate the fish into their menu.
The NOAA calls the lionfish a "delicious, delicately flavored fish" similar in texture to grouper.
Many recipes for lionfish can be found in coastal cookbooks, some including fried lionfish, lionfish ceviche, lionfish jerky and grilled lionfish.
The invasiveness of the red lionfish is an extreme problem, and relatively little information is still known about the animal.
The NOAA has research foci in place to better understand the fish and the implications surround its invasive nature.
Some of these include investigating biotechnical solutions for control of the population, and understanding how the larvae are dispersed.
Another important area of study is what controls the population in its native area.
Researchers hope to discover what moderates lionfish populations in the Indo-Pacific and apply this information to control the invasive populations, without introducing additional invasive species.
NOAA also plans to further its "Lionfish as Food" campaign, since human hunting of the fish is the only form of control known as of September 2013.
The NOAA also encourages people to report lionfish sightings, to help track lionfish population dispersal. 
This article includes four lists of countries of the world sorted by their gross domestic product per capita at nominal values.
This is the value of all final goods and services produced within a nation in a given year, converted at market exchange rates to current U.S. dollars, divided by the average (or mid-year) population for the same year.
These figures should be used with caution.
GDP per capita is often considered an indicator of a country's average wealth.
However, it is only a measure of mean average wealth and so unlike a median average wealth measure it does not necessarily reflect the wealth of any real, and therefore any significant, population group within a country.
Comparisons of national wealth are also frequently made on the basis of purchasing power parity (PPP), in an attempt to adjust for differences in the cost of living in different countries.
("See" List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita.)
However, PPP has many drawbacks; it does not reflect the value of economic output in international trade, it requires more estimation than nominal GDP per capita and also calculates the cost of living based on a mean rather than on a median measure of wealth.
On the whole, PPP per capita figures are more narrowly spread than nominal GDP per capita figures.
However, it should also be noted, the lower a country's income equality rating the higher its relative purchasing power parity (PPP) in comparison to a country of the same, or similar, nominal GDP per capita level.
For these reasons purchasing power parity (PPP) can be described as a biased and even a politically motivated measure of wealth, in that the measure reduces the apparent differences in wealth between rich and poor countries but increases the apparent differences of wealth between countries in line with their comparative income equality levels.
For example in 2012, according to International Monetary Fund figures, Canada had a slightly higher nominal GDP per capita, $52,300, than the United States of America (USA), $51,704, but because the USA had less equal income equality, in comparison to Canada, paradoxically Canada ended up with a much lower purchasing power parity (PPP) per capita, $42,317, than the USA, $51,704, and so according to that rating Canada was considerably poorer than the USA in 2012.
In reality of course, the only really significant difference in wealth per capita between the USA and Canada in 2012 was in how fairly it was spread across each country, i.e.
the income equality level.
Non-sovereign entities (the world, the European Union, and some dependent territories) are included in the list because they appear in the sources.
These economies are not ranked in the charts here, but are listed in sequence by GDP per capita for comparison.
They are marked in "italics".
All data are in current United States dollars. 
Grow Up, Tony Phillips is a 2013 comedy film by American director Emily Hagins and her fourth feature film.
It was first released on October 31, 2013 at the South by Southwest film festival and stars Tony Vespe as Tony Phillips, a young teenager's love for Halloween.
Unlike her prior feature-length films, "Grow Up, Tony Phillips" does not feature any supernatural elements seen in past films such as "Pathogen" or "My Sucky Teen Romance".