Question: When was the peace plan accepted?
About the article "Lebanon", section "Civil war and occupation".

Candidate passages:
Several Peace Plans had been rejected (the Carrington-Cutiliero plan, the Vance-Owen plan, the "HMS Invincible" package, the Owen-Stoltenburg plan, and the European Union Action Plan).
At the end of July, a blueprint was designed by the Contact Group, consisting of the United States, Great Britain, France, Germany and Russia, which was accepted by the Croat, Serb and Bosnian parties.
The Bosnian Serbs, however, refused the plan.
In early August, in an attempt to coerce the Bosnian Serbs into accepting the plan, the Serbian government cut political and economic relationships with the Bosnian Serb leaders.
This decision was welcomed by the UN Security Council.
On 23 September, the UN Security Council officially welcomed the agreement of the warring parties to the peace plan, condemned the Bosnian Serb refusal, and strengthened the sanctions against the Bosnian Serb entity. 
Attempts to make peace.
The Rogers peace plan and the Sadat initiative (1970-1972).
Following the Six-Day War, the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 242 which proposed a peaceful solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict.
The resolution was accepted by Israel, Jordan, and Egypt, but rejected by Syria until 1972-1973.
In 1970, US Secretary of State William P. Rogers proposed the Rogers Plan, which called for a 90-day cease-fire, a military standstill zone on each side of the Suez Canal, and an effort to reach agreement in the framework of UN Resolution 242.
The Egyptian government accepted the Rogers Plan even before Anwar Sadat became president.
Israel refused to enter negotiations with Egypt based on the Rogers peace plan.
No breakthrough occurred even after President Sadat in 1972 surprised most observers by suddenly expelling Soviet military advisers from Egypt and again signaled to the United States government his willingness to negotiate based on the Rogers plan. 
The Kofi Annan peace plan for Syria or the six-point peace plan for Syria was launched in March 2012 by the Arab League and the United Nations (UN), when the violent Syrian conflict or civil war had raged for a year.
After the initiators had believed for some days end of March and beginning of April that the Syrian regime was willing to comply with the peace plan, new signs of war and statements of politicians gradually cast discouraging shadows over those hopes.
By the first of May 2012, the UN had to admit that the peace plan was in dire straits.
Heavy regime violence on 25 May, and the promise of the Free Syrian Army (FSA) on 1 June to resume its ‘defensive operations’, made clear that this peace initiative had, for the time being, run aground.
Several new peace initiatives would follow, recently the attempt in 2012-2013 at a Geneva II Middle East peace conference and the Russian initiative in November 2013 for(peace) talks in Moscow. 
The station was set to open in 2011.
The station lies on the Merwede-Lingelijn (Dordrecht - Geldermalsen) and is located between Arkel and Leerdam.
The station is primarily for western Leerdam and small settlements in the area.
It is still unknown when construction work will begin.
The station plan has been accepted. 
Historian Elizabeth Cobbs Hoffman in her book "All You Need is Love: The Peace Corps and the Spirit of the 1960s" says that Nixon had decided to dismantle the Peace Corps.
In July 1970, Nixon instructed Bob Haldeman to get Bryce Harlow on the job of getting the Peace Corps "chopped per the president's instructions" adding that "this has to be done and has to be done now... We can't do it just before the '72 elections and we have to do it after November 1970."
Haldeman told subordinates to cut the budget by one-third and noted in his diary that the president wanted the budget cut "down far enough to decimate them."
Two months after the November 1970 elections the plan went into action.
Blatchford received the proposed federal budget for FY72 and to his surprise, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) had cut the number of Peace Corps volunteers from 9,000 to 5,800 and reduced the Peace Corps' budget from $90 million to $60 million.
Blatchford dashed off a memo to John Ehrlichman, special assistant to the President on domestic affairs pleading for preservation of the Peace Corps at its current budget level.
"It will be quite evident to most Congressmen and to the public that the president's expansion of service opportunities has begun with a 30 percent cut over last year's request for the largest of the merged agencies," wrote Blatchford.
Congress had its own plan to cut the Peace Corps' budget.
On December 17, 1971 Congress passed a continuing resolution slashing Blatchford's $82 million operating budget by $10 million.
"Our whole budget doesn't amount to half the price of a submarine," said Blatchford.
"Those characters over at the Defense Department are rolling in dough.
They round off their cost estimates to the nearest Peace Corps budget."
Blatchford ordered a temporary halt to signing up new volunteers although applications continued to be accepted.
Then Blatchford ordered that plans be drawn up for the termination of half of the 8,000 volunteers in the field.
The plans would be implemented if Congress failed to restore the Peace Corps' funds.
"There is a point of no return when we must use the money we have to bring these people back to the United States," said one Peace Corps official.
It was time for Blatchford to play hardball.
Blatchford announced that 2,313 volunteers stationed in thirty-three countries were being brought home.
Blatchford cleared the diplomatic cables with the State Department and arranged to send them one minute past midnight on March 7, 1972 for volunteers to return home by April 1, 1972.
The removal of Peace Corps volunteers would be an international embarrassment to the United States of enormous proportions.
Congressman Otto Passman, a longtime opponent of the Peace Corps, called Blatchford on March 7, the day the cables were to go out, and offered the Peace Corps extra funds if Blatchford would take the heat off.
Passman also told Blatchford that the Peace Corps didn't have as many friends in the White House as he thought.
According to Historian Elizabeth Cobbs Hoffman, Blatchford never suspected that his problems came from the White House and remained convinced that President Nixon was a friend of the Peace Corps.P.
David Searles in his book "The Peace Corps Experience: Challenge and Change, 1969-1976" says that Blatchford's own assessment of Nixon's support 25 years later is that President Nixon did lose some of his early enthusiasm for the Peace Corps as a result of what Nixon thought of as widespread hostility to the President from Peace Corps Volunteers.
However Baltchford also contends that Nixon originally gave more support to the Peace Corps than any President other than Kennedy.
Blatchford also credits Republicans in the Senate like Barry Goldwater and Charles Percy for supporting the Peace Corps when Democrat William Fulbright tried to cut the Peace Corps' budget in 1969.
Blatchford did sense hostility to the Peace Corps from some of the president's advisors, especially Ehrlichman and Patrick Buchanan, but says it did not hamper his work.