Question: In 2010, how many UK respondents to the poll claimed to be fairly convinced of climate change?
About the article "Global warming", section "Surveys of public opinion".

Candidate passages:
Researchers at the University of Michigan have found that the public's belief as to the causes of global warming depends on the wording choice used in the polls.
In 2007–2008 Gallup Polls surveyed 127 countries.
Over a third of the world's population was unaware of global warming, with people in developing countries less aware than those in developed, and those in Africa the least aware.
Of those aware, Latin America leads in belief that temperature changes are a result of human activities while Africa, parts of Asia and the Middle East, and a few countries from the Former Soviet Union lead in the opposite belief.
There is a significant contrast of the opinions of the concept and the appropriate response between Europe and the United States.
Nick Pidgeon of Cardiff University said that "results show the different stages of engagement about global warming on each side of the Atlantic", adding, "The debate in Europe is about what action needs to be taken, while many in the US still debate whether climate change is happening."
A 2010 poll by the Office of National Statistics found that 75% of UK respondents were at least "fairly convinced" that the world's climate is changing, compared to 87% in a similar survey in 2006.
A January 2011 ICM poll in the UK found 83% of respondents viewed climate change as a current or imminent threat, while 14% said it was no threat.
Opinion was unchanged from an August 2009 poll asking the same question, though there had been a slight polarisation of opposing views.
By 2010, with 111 countries surveyed, Gallup determined that there was a substantial decrease in the number of Americans and Europeans who viewed global warming as a serious threat.
In the US, a little over half the population (53%) now viewed it as a serious concern for either themselves or their families; this was 10% below the 2008 poll (63%).
Latin America had the biggest rise in concern, with 73% saying global warming was a serious threat to their families.
That global poll also found that people are more likely to attribute global warming to human activities than to natural causes, except in the USA where nearly half (47%) of the population attributed global warming to natural causes.
A March–May 2013 survey by Pew Research Center for the People & the Press polled 39 countries about global threats.
According to 54% of those questioned, global warming featured top of the perceived global threats.
In a January 2013 survey, Pew found that 69% of Americans say there is solid evidence that the Earth's average temperature has been getting warmer over the past few decades, up six points since November 2011 and 12 points since 2009.
According to a 2008 survey of Radio RPP, only 37% of respondents think that water is scarce in Peru.
Only 27% of respondents living in Lima—a city in the middle of a desert—believe water to be scarce in Lima.
72% of respondents throughout the country believe that Peru is affected by climate change.
However, only 8% of respondents think that water scarcity is a consequence of Climate Change. 
Dennis Bray and Hans von Storch conducted a survey in August 2008 of 2058 climate scientists from 34 different countries.
A web link with a unique identifier was given to each respondent to eliminate multiple responses.
A total of 373 responses were received giving an overall response rate of 18.2%.
No paper on climate change consensus based on this survey has been published yet (February 2010), but one on another subject has been published based on the survey.
The survey was composed of 76 questions split into a number of sections.
There were sections on the demographics of the respondents, their assessment of the state of climate science, how good the science is, climate change impacts, adaptation and mitigation, their opinion of the IPCC, and how well climate science was being communicated to the public.
Most of the answers were on a scale from 1 to 7 from 'not at all' to 'very much'.
In the section on climate change impacts, questions 20, 21 were relevant to scientific opinion on climate change.
Question 20 "How convinced are you that climate change, whether natural or anthropogenic, is occurring now?"
got 67.1% very much convinced, 26.7% to some large extent (5–6), 6.2% said to some small extent (2–4), none said not at all.
Question 21 "How convinced are you that most of recent or near future climate change is, or willbe, a result of anthropogenic causes?"
received 34.6% very much convinced, 48.9% being convinced to a large extent (5–6), 15.1% to a small extent (2–4), and 1.35% not convinced at all. 
A 2002 survey showed that over 95% of respondents said that the use of tax money for addressing climate change was either "Very important" or "Fairly important".
A little over half of the respondents were willing to change the use of hot water, electricity consumption and travel arrangement in order to reduce the impact of climate change.
A little under half did not want to decrease internal building temperatures as a means of reducing climate change impact.
A201A 2012 FOI survey on climate change where the respondents were municipal directors and politicians indicated that they may be divided into three groups - climate believers 30%), uncertain (61%) and climate deniers (9%) - on the basis of the responses to questions about the existence of climate change and its being caused by human activities.
The unprofessional term "denier" was incorrectly used on the category not supporting the IPCC mainstream view since normally this term means a person unable or unwilling to submit to scientific evidence supporting the occurrence of climate change.
There are, however, no evidence in the report that the skeptical views indicated fall into this category since undeniably very few denies climate change itself but rather questions the stated causes behind climate change and the demanded measures to stop it. 
A six-month study in 1988 on climate change reporting in the media found that 80% of stories were no worse than slightly inaccurate.
However, one story in six contained significant misreporting.
The popular media in New Zealand often give equal weight to the those supporting anthropogenic climate change and those who deny it.
This stance is out of step with the findings of the scientific community where the vast majority support the climate change scenarios.
A survey carried out in 2007 on climate change gave the following responses:In August 2012, a Horizons poll showed that 64.4 per cent of respondents wanted Parliament to do more to respond to global warming.
67.5 per cent of respondents wanted business to do more to address global warming.
Horizons commented that the poll "makes a strong case for more political action".