Question: When was the last dismissal by a parliamentary vote of no confidence in Finland?
About the article "Finland", section "Cabinet".

Candidate passages:
 "For more details, see Constructive Vote of No Confidence".
Votes of no-confidence.
Unlike in other parliamentary legislatures, the "Bundestag" cannot remove the chancellor simply with a Motion of No Confidence.
Instead, the early removal of a chancellor is only possible when it simultaneously agrees on a successor.
In order to garner legislative support in the "Bundestag", the chancellor can also call for a regular Motion of Confidence, either combined with a legislative proposal or as a standalone vote.
Only if such a vote fails may the President dissolve the "Bundestag".
This procedure exists to avoid the situation that existed in the Weimar Republic, when votes of no-confidence were over-used or abused by parties. 
Harper's Cabinet was defeated in a no-confidence vote on March 25, 2011, after being found in contempt of Parliament, thus triggering a general election.
This was the first occurrence in Commonwealth history of a government in the Westminster parliamentary tradition losing the confidence of the House of Commons on the grounds of contempt of Parliament.
The no-confidence motion was carried with a vote of 156 in favor of the motion, and 145 against. 
The 1979 vote of no confidence in the government of James Callaghan was a vote of no confidence in the British Labour Government of James Callaghan which occurred on 28 March 1979.
The vote was brought by opposition leader Margaret Thatcher and was lost by the Labour Government by one vote (311 votes to 310), forcing a general election which was won by Thatcher's party.
The last time an election had been forced by the House of Commons was in 1924, when Ramsay MacDonald, the first Labour Prime Minister, lost a vote of confidence.
Labour politician Roy Hattersley was later to remark that the vote marked "the last rites" of 'old Labour'.
Labour would not return to government for another 18 years.
The BBC has referred to the vote as "one of the most dramatic nights in Westminster history". 
Opposition motions are initiated by the Opposition party and often occur with little chance of a confidence motion succeeding.
By convention a no confidence vote will take precedence over normal Parliamentary business for that day and will begin with Speeches from the Prime Minister and the leader of the Opposition rather than the Ministers for the policy area which may be the concern of the motion.
Not every no confidence motion will profess no confidence in the Government, some no confidence motions only state no confidence in the particular policies of a government.
Probably the most famous no confidence motion was on the night of 28 March 1979 when Jim Callagahan's Labour Government fell from office by one vote, 311-310.
It was one of the most dramatic nights in Westminster's history.
Although there is no commonly accepted and comprehensive definition of a confidence motion it is possible to identify confidence motions from their timing, the speakers and the terms of the motion.
Motions of confidence are supportive of the Government whereas motions of no confidence are unsupportive of the Government.
It can be difficult to distinguish an opposition no confidence motion and other opposition motions critical of Government policy.
The term censure motion can also refer a category of motion which does not attempt to remove the Government.
A Government can also be forced into resigning or calling an election by a lost vote on the Queen's Speech (The government's legislative programme), losing a Finance Bill or a vote on a major issue on which it fought a General Election campaign. 
The 1866 vote of no confidence against the government of the Earl Russell occurred when the Government of John Russell, 1st Earl Russell was defeated on Parliamentary reform proposals on 18th June 1866.