Question: What was the year before Katrina and how many visitors did the city have that year?
About the article "Bourbon Street", section "Impact of Hurricane Katrina".

Candidate passages:
Hurricane on the Bayou is an American 2006 documentary film that focuses on the wetlands of Louisiana before and after Hurricane Katrina.
"Hurricane on the Bayou" is both a documentary of Hurricane Katrina's effects and a call to restore Louisiana's wetlands, rebuild New Orleans, and honor the culture of the city.
The film is narrated by actress Meryl Streep and driven by a jazz-, blues-, Cajun-, and gospel-fueled soundtrack featuring Tab Benoit, Amanda Shaw, Mavis Staples and Allen Toussaint.
It was originally a "what-if" scenario about a major hurricane impacting New Orleans prior to Hurricane Katrina .
The film debuted at the Entergy IMAX in New Orleans, La., on the one-year anniversary of Hurricane Katrina, several months before being shown elsewhere. 
In 2005, its final year of operation, it had a school performance score of 31.2 from the State of Louisiana.
Andrew Vanacore of "The Times-Picayune" said that a 31.2 was far below what the state considered to be "academically acceptable" and that "Like many high schools before Hurricane Katrina, the old Abramson had struggled academically".
Student publications included the "Dispatch" school newspaper and the "Ship’s Log" yearbook. 
FEMA received intense criticism for its response to the Hurricane Katrina disaster in August 2005.
FEMA had pre-positioned response personnel in the Gulf Coast region.
However, many could not render direct assistance and were only able to report on the dire situation along the Gulf Coast, especially from New Orleans.
Within three days, a large contingent of National Guard and active duty troops were deployed to the region.
The enormous number of evacuees simply overwhelmed rescue personnel.
The situation was compounded by flood waters in the city that hampered transportation and poor communication among the federal government, state and local entities.
FEMA was widely criticized for what is seen as a slow initial response to the disaster and an inability to effectively manage, care for and move those trying to leave the city.
Then-FEMA Director Michael D. Brown was criticized personally for a slow response and an apparent disconnection with the situation.
Michael Brown would eventually be relieved of command of the Katrina disaster and soon thereafter resigned.
Katrina was seen as the first major test of the nation’s new disaster response plan under DHS.
It is widely held that many things did not function as planned.
According to the U.S. House of Representatives Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina:  "The Secretary Department of Homeland Security should have designated the Principal Federal Official on Saturday, two days prior to landfall, from the roster of PFOs who had successfully completed the required training, unlike then FEMA Director Michael Brown.
Considerable confusion was caused by the Secretary’s PFO decisions."
"DHS and FEMA lacked adequate trained and experienced staff for the Katrina response."
"The readiness of FEMA’s national emergency response teams was inadequate and reduced the effectiveness of the federal response."
"Long-standing weaknesses and the magnitude of the disaster overwhelmed FEMA’s ability to provide emergency shelter and temporary housing."
"FEMA logistics and contracting systems did not support a targeted, massive, and sustained provision of commodities."
"Before Katrina, FEMA suffered from a lack of sufficiently trained procurement professionals."
Other failings were also noted.
The Committee devoted an entire section of the report to listing the actions of FEMA.
Their conclusion was:"For years emergency management professionals have been warning that FEMA’s preparedness has eroded.
Many believe this erosion is a result of the separation of the preparedness function from FEMA, the drain of long-term professional staff along with their institutional knowledge and expertise, and the inadequate readiness of FEMA’s national emergency response teams.
The combination of these staffing, training, and organizational structures made FEMA’s inadequate performance in the face of adisaster the size of Katrina all but inevitable.
"Pursuant to a temporary restraining order issued by Hon.
Stanwood R. Duval, United States District Court Judge, Eastern District of Louisiana as a result of the McWaters v. FEMA class-action, 7 February 2006 was set as the deadline for the official end of any further coverage of temporary housing costs for Katrina victims.
After the February 7 deadline, Katrina victims were left to their own devices either to find permanent housing for the long term, or to continue in social welfare programs set up by other organizations.
There were many Katrina evacuees living in temporary shelters and/or trailer parks set up by FEMA and other relief organizations in the first months after the disaster hit, but many more were still unable to find housing.
In July 2007, ice that had been ordered for Katrina victims but had never been used and kept in storage facilities, at a cost of $12.5 million, was melted down.
In June 2008, a CNN investigation found that FEMA gave away about $85 million in household goods meant for Hurricane Katrina victims to 16 other states. 
Given Bourbon Street's high ground location in the French Quarter, it was mostly intact following 2005's Hurricane Katrina.
A major tourist attraction, Bourbon Street renovation was given high priority after the storm.
Despite these efforts, New Orleans was still experiencing a dearth of visitors.
In 2004, a year before Katrina, the city had 10.1 million visitors.
A year after the storm, that number was 3.7 million.
Attempts to draw tourists back to the city were undertaken by the New Orleans Tourism Marketing Corporation that featured Louisiana celebrities such as chef Emeril Lagasse and actress Patricia Clarkson with the slogan "Come Fall In Love With Louisiana All Over Again."
Attracting tourists was vital, as one third of the city's operating budget, approximately $6 billion, came from the tourism industry.
Officials saw tourists as vital for economic recovery in the city.
A major impedance for tourists were the mixed messages regarding the city's level of recovery.
Advertising campaigns gave the impression that the city was thriving.
At the same time, New Orleans was asking for increased federal assistance and National Guardsmen to combat crime waves in the city.
The tourism industry received a boom when the 2006 Mardi Gras went off without a hitch.
Popular Bourbon Street restaurants, such as Galatoire's, reopened around this time as well.
Reopening and rebuilding of popular tourist attractions led to a surge in post-Katrina tourists.
By 2009, the city attracted 7.9 million tourists.
The city of Galena hosts more than one million visitors annually.
The exact number of visitors varies, depending upon the source of the estimate and the year it was made.
"The New York Times" cited "more than a million" visitors in 2002, as did the "Smithsonian" magazine in 2007.
In 2003, a "Chicago Tribune" article stated 1.3 million as the number of visitors to the city of Galena per year; two years later the same publication estimated 1.4 million annual visitors.
The historic district is populated by tourist-driven shops and business, including dozens of bed and breakfast inns.
More than a dozen art galleries dot the downtown area, which is also home to numerous restaurants and taverns.
After the Galena Historic District was listed on the National Register, the area began to change.
Antique stores sprouted up, according to "The New York Times", "like mushrooms after a steady rain."
The antique stores have since been replaced.
More restaurants, and retail shops, many geared toward tourists are located in the storefronts of downtown Galena.
The changes by what some residents and business owners have linked to owners in Chicago have met with mixed reviews.
"The New York Times" reported in 2007 that many long-time Galena residents and second home owners alike appreciated the shift from antique shops to retail and restaurants.
In a 2005 "Chicago Tribune" article, some residents and business owners lamented the growth of the city as well as the rise in rent costs instigated by the change in Galena's commercial base.