Question: Whose killing is referred to by opponents of the Obama administration as a possible partisan element of the film Zero Dark Thirty?
About the article "Zero Dark Thirty", section "Allegations of partisanship".

Candidate passages:
Allegations of partisanship.
Partisan political controversy arose related to the film before shooting began.
Opponents of the Obama Administration charged that "Zero Dark Thirty" was scheduled for an October release just before the November presidential election to support his re-election, as Bin Laden's killing is regarded as a success for President Obama.
Sony denied that politics was a factor in release scheduling and said the date was the best available spot for an action-thriller in a crowded lineup.
The film's screenwriter added, "the president is not depicted in the movie.
He's just not in the movie.
"The distributor Columbia Pictures, sensitive to political perceptions, considered rescheduling the film release for as late as early 2013.
It set a limited-release date for December 19, 2012, well after the election and rendering moot any alleged political conflict.
The nationwide release date was pushed back to January 11, 2013, moving it out of the crowded Christmas period and closer to the Academy Awards.
After the film's limited release, given the controversy related to the film's depiction of torture and its role in gaining critical information, "The New York Times" columnist Frank Bruni concluded that the film is "a far, far cry from the rousing piece of pro-Obama propaganda that some conservatives feared it would be".
Two months later, the paper's columnist Roger Cohen wrote that the film was "a courageous work that is disturbing in the way that art should be".
Cohen disagreed with Steve Coll's critique of the screenwriter's stated effort not to "play fast and loose with history", writing that "Boal has honored those words".
Cohen ended with a note about a Timothy Garton Ash analysis of George Orwell mixing fact and "invented" stories in "Down and Out in Paris and London" – as further support for Boal's method.
"Zero Dark Thirty" has received some criticism for significant historical inaccuracy.
Former assistant secretary of Defense Graham T. Allison has opined that the film is inaccurate in three important regards: the overstatement of the positive role of enhanced interrogation methods, the understatement of the role of the Obama administration, and the portrayal of the efforts as being driven by one agent battling against the CIA "system". 
A fictionalized account of al-Baluchi's interrogation at black sites is depicted in the 2012 film "Zero Dark Thirty".
The character "Ammar" is portrayed by Reda Kateb. 
The 22-minute film alleges President Obama and his administration intentionally leaked sensitive details about covert intelligence operations.
According to a "New York Times" report, the film attempts to portray Obama "as a braggart taking credit for the accomplishments of special forces and intelligence operatives".
Included are interviews with former intelligence officers, who suggest that the White House deliberately leaked details about the raid on bin Laden's compound that could help terrorists identify the Navy SEALs involved, along with other sensitive information.
Ben Smith, identified in the film as a former SEAL, is seen saying, "Mr. President, you did not kill Osama bin Laden, America did.
The work that the American military has done killed Osama bin Laden.
You did not.
As a citizen, it is my civic duty to tell the president to stop leaking information to the enemy.
It will get Americans killed."
Fred Rustmann, a retired CIA officer, says in the video that days after the bin Laden raid, Hollywood elites were invited to the White House to be briefed on exactly how the raid took place.
Rustmann alleged that the administration leaked "what kind of sources we had, what kind of methods we used, all for the purpose of making a Hollywood movie", referring to the movie "Zero Dark Thirty", which was released on December 19, 2012.
Retired USMC Lt. Col. Bill Cowan alleges that Obama divulged the covert information to Hollywood for political gain, saying in the video "When we divulge national security information such as the identity of the organization that killed Osama bin Laden, we have now put all of those men, all of their families, everybody around them at some sort of risk."
The film also alleges classified information was leaked about the Stuxnet virus attack on the Iranian nuclear program and Obama’s “kill list” of suspected terrorists. 
Special Operations OPSEC Education Fund, Inc. (OPSEC) is a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization in the United States.
It began a media campaign critical of President Obama in August 2012, accusing his administration of disclosing sensitive information about the killing of Osama bin Laden and taking too much credit for the operation.OPSEC's members are primarily former U.S. special operations forces and intelligence community personnel.
Its leaders have ties to the Republican Party though the group describes itself as non-partisan.
As of mid-August 2012, it claims to have raised almost $1 million.
The military portmanteau "OPSEC" (Operations Security) is where security measures are taken to prevent friendly operations and intentions from being observed by an adversary's intelligence systems.