Question: Were there any September 11 attackers who were originally from Egypt?
About the article "September 11 attacks", section "FBI".

Candidate passages:
A parliamentary election to the People's Assembly of Egypt was held from 28 November 2011 to 11 January 2012, following the revolution that ousted President Hosni Mubarak, after which the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) dissolved the parliament of Egypt.
However the dissolution was ruled unconstitutional and Parliament was reinstated.
Originally, the election had been scheduled to be held in September 2011, but was postponed amid concerns that established parties would gain undue advantage.
The election was proclaimed the first honest national election of any sort held in Egypt since the overthrow of the monarchy in 1952.
However, there were complaints of irregularities and fraud.
The main focus of the new elected parliament was to be the selection of the members of the Constituent Assembly of Egypt. 
The U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence delivered their bipartisan report on the terrorist attacks on January 15, 2014.
The majority of the committee offered the following conclusions:  The attacks were preventable.
Fifteen people in Libya who have tried to help the FBI investigation have been killed.
There were no protests in the area prior to the attack.
Terrorists who participated in the attacks included members of al-Qa'ida in the Lands of the Islamic Maghreb, Ansar al-Sharia, al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, and the Mohammad Jamal Network.
No 'stand down' order was given by President Barack Obama or any other official anywhere in the government in terms of possible military efforts to combat the attackers, despite later reports.
The "Benghazi attacks have been the subject of misinformed speculation and accusations long after the basic facts of the attacks have been determined, thereby distracting attention from more important concerns: the tragic deaths of four brave Americans, the hunt for their attackers, efforts by the U.S. Government to avoid future attacks, and the future of the U.S-Libya relationship."
The CIA talking points were flawed but still "painted a mostly accurate picture of the IC's analysis of the Benghazi attacks at that time, in an unclassified form and without compromising the nascent investigation of the attacks."
No evidence was found of any effort to downplay the role of terrorists enacting a pre-planned strike in the Benghazi attacks.
The reference to "al-Qa'ida" included in early drafts of the talking points was removed by CIA staff, not by the White House or the FBI, as was incorrectly alleged by some members of Congress and the press.
The "CIA's September 15, 2012, talking points.. .wrongly attributed the genesis of the Benghazi attacks to protests that became violent.
However, as stated in the report, this characterization reflected the assessment by the IC of the information available at that time, which lacked sufficient intelligence and eyewitness statements to conclude that there were no protests.
Further, it is important to remember that this early assessment was made in the context of approximately 40 protests around the globe against U.S. embassies and consulates in response to an inflammatory film.
There were also other violent attacks against U.S. embassies and consulates in Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen and other cities around the world on or after September 11."
In general, the majority concluded "that the interagency coordination process on the talking points followed normal, but rushed coordination procedures and that there were no efforts by the White House or any other Executive Branch entities to 'cover-up' facts or make alterations for political purposes."
Senators from the Republican Party offered additional views:  The U.S. State Department was resistant to cooperating with the Senate investigation.
The Obama administration manipulated the facts around the attack, with its handling of the attacks having been "a source of confusion" and that the "Administration chose to try to frame the story in a way that minimized any connection to terrorism".  
Two heavily armed attackers arrived by the white car at the Akshardham temple's Gate 3 at 4:45pm.
They tried to enter through the main Gate 3 but were unsuccessful due to security checks.
So they scaled the perimeter fence and opened fire, killing a woman and a temple volunteer immediately at a nearby book stall.
They tried to enter main temple monument but were unsuccessful as complex was locked shut from inside by volunteers.
They rushed to the exhibition halls.
Doors of the multimedia theatre was shut from inside so they entered Exhibition Hall 1 from exit door and opened fire killing many people.
Later they climbed up the roof top of the hall and hid there.
By 5 pm, the police and commando units reached the complex and evacuated visitors and started search operation for attackers.
The attackers later opened fire the commandos evacuating main temple complex.
The security forces cordoned the area and cross fired to not let attackers escape.
The National Security Guard (NSG) commandos commonly called Black Cats intervened under the operation codenamed "Vajra Shakti".
They joined the security forces at 11:30 pm.
The operation continued through the night and ended with killing of the two attackers at 6:45 am hiding in the bushes.
By the end of the attack, 30 persons were killed excluding attackers and more than 80 persons were wounded including atleast 23 police officers.
Apart from the 27 people killed in the first assault, two state police officers and one commando were also killed in the action.
One more seriously injured commando Surjan Singh Bhandari who died after nearly 2 years of being in a coma.
Later attackers were identified as Murtuza Hafiz Yasin and Ashraf Ali Mohammed Farooq. 
At the time of his retirement, General Brar was commanding the Eastern Theatre of India (the borders with China, Nepal, Bangladesh and Myanmar), and was also responsible for the defence of Bhutan.
He was also involved in the counter-insurgency operations in North-East India.
After his retirement, General Brar had to reside in the heavily guarded cantonment area of Mumbai.
There have been attempts on his life, but none have yet succeeded.
On 30 September 2012, while on Oxford Street in London with his wife, he was knifed in the throat by four men outside a hotel.
He received minor injuries and was taken to hospital.
Later, he was discharged.
The attackers' identities were not immediately confirmed.
On 8 October, two of the men involved, Barjinder Singh Sangha (born 25 March 1979; aged 33) of Wolverhampton, and Mandeep Singh Sandhu (born 30 April 1978; aged 34) of Great Barr, Birmingham, were charged with wounding with intent to do grievous bodily harm on the retired general.
Both appeared at Westminster Magistrates' Court later.
Mr. Singh Sangha was also charged with common assault on General Brar's wife, Meena.
In court, the two men wore identical grey T-shirts, large, flowing beards and navy blue and black turbans.
Both were remanded to police custody and scheduled to be present on 7 December at Southwark Crown Court.
Barjinder Singh Sangha pleaded guilty to attacking Brar in January 2013.
On 8 February, 38-year-old Harjit Kaur, of Hayes, west London, was also charged for her part in the attack.
She was formally accused of wounding with intent to do grievous bodily harm, and was scheduled to later appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court.
Sandhu and 36-year-old Dilbagh Singh pleaded not guilty to the same charge.
On 2 April, a Metropolitan Police spokesperson said Sangha, Sandhu, Dilbagh Singh and Kaur would stand trial around 15 July.
At the trial, which opened at Southwark Crown Court on 15 July, Kaur also denied the charge of wounding with intent to do grievous bodily harm.
Crown Prosecutor Annabel Darlow said, "This was no random attack.
This was a highly premeditated assault by people who thought about what they were doing and planned it."
During the trial, it was disclosed that when the defendants discovered General Brar was holidaying in London without any security, they scoped out his movements over two days.
The night of the attack, Kaur tailed Brar and his wife from a casino to a restaurant.
After the couple had left the restaurant, she followed them onto the bus returning to their hotel.
Kaur then relayed the couple's position to the other attackers, who ambushed them in Old Quebec Street.
Sangha attacked the general with a knife while the others attempted to restrain him and his wife.
On 31 July, Sandhu, Dilbagh Singh and Kaur were convicted of wounding with intent; Sangha had pleaded guilty to the charge earlier.
The attackers were originally scheduled to be sentenced on 19 September; however, a pre-sentencing document had not been issued by then.
As a result, on 14 October the Southwark Crown Court changed the sentencing date to 10 December.
On 10 December, Sandhu and Dilbagh Singh were sentenced to 14 years imprisonment; Kaur was sentenced to 11 years and Sangha to 10.5 years. 
The 2005 World Judo Championships were the 24th edition of the Judo World Championships, and were held in Cairo, Egypt from September 8 to September 11, 2005.
Brazilian João Derly was voted as best performance of the championship.