I ve been impressed with the variety of kritik arguments on this topic and have worked to stay informed. Counterplans I tend to resolve theory debates on the side of the negative but more fundamentally on the side of debaters who have given theory the most thought. Theory is a critical part of debate strategy and those who are trained are dangerous whether they be Aff or Neg. Conditionality and Pics are usually two great tastes that taste great together. International Fiat is slightly less delicious.
Severance is usually a tougher sell than intrinsicness.
My biggest gripe with most debates deals with risk analysis. Please provide me with a framework for evaluating what you think you re winning at the end of the debate. Play nicely with others. Debaters who go after judges usually seem to be begging the basic question. This is a persuasive activity.