With manifest hypocrisy, Omni even offers to send a protest card to the White House objecting to the censorship of science. This tactic of role-reversal is as repugnant in a magazine as it is in a court of law. She insinuates that young people should be exposed to anti-evolutionary propaganda as a learning tool. It would be difficult for a tenth-grader to comprehend why we're going through these two extremely different concepts. This is the issue before evolutionists, and how they approach it is indicative of how they approach all questions of truth.
Special creation is either true or false.
Evidence, and evidence alone, should determine the place of creation in public schools. Any argument not rooted in scientific evidence is obscurant. If this evidence supports special creation, it deserves to be taught along side of evolution. Questions of cosmogony should be resolved by studying evidence, not by ridiculing those who do not conform to her views. Most of the Omni authors seemed to imply that scientific truth is obtainable by a show of hands.