We agree that the reorganisation of the paragraph has helped to improve the clarity and logic of the text. This should include an assessment of the potential advantages and disadvantages of the alternative measures, including, where appropriate, flexibility and cost , effectiveness considerations. We very much welcome the recognition that all stakeholders must be involved in the examination of management options. The meaning behind the new reference to 'flexibility' in the new text is not clear at the moment and should therefore be clarified. There should be a transparent explanation of the need for the measures and the procedures followed to establish them.
Transparency is essential throughout the entire risk analysis process.
It is vital that the reason why a particular measure was introduced, including possible alternative approaches that have been considered, are clearly communicated and documented. We are pleased that reference is now made to measures, as well as to decisions. We agree that precautionary measures should also be proportionate. It will however always be easier to quantify the economic impact of introducing a measure, compared with the long-term public health and economic costs of not taking action. This needs to be borne in mind when determining the type of measures that are required.