That is just about the only item that is established formally, which is that if it were to come to a roll-call vote, as it were, it would be a majority vote cast. That has not been the approach taken in the past. The approach taken in the past for the selection of the Managing Director has been a consensus of the Board in the end. And it is fair to say that 13 years ago, a little more than 13 years ago, in the selection of the previous Managing Director, there was also a straw-poll process at that point as well. But, ultimately, the decision was a consensus decision.
Voting is by Directors, which is constituency.
By the Directors, which is the constituency. That's correct, yes. You know, as I say, that is not only a technical question but a theoretical question, because I think, you know, the general approach has always been one of consensus. Tom, one of the Directors characterized that this is a wonderful way to ensure that no work gets done whatsoever. Well, no, I think, in fact, the work is going forward and the Board is continuing its normal workload, and these meetings, for example, are held additionally to what the normal workload is.