An inductive argument which ignores overriding evidence which would prove a different conclusion. This is common is advertising. Quoting out of context can also lead to this fallacy, as can ignoring current events. Where the conclusion of the argument depends on the fact that a word is being used in two different senses due too semantic ambiguity . Therefore, you have the right to do what you want.
Semantic ambiguity is the result of one word having two or more definitions.
Where the conclusion of the argument depends on the fact that a sentence is syntactically ambiguous . Therefore, you can't take your Cadillac to him. This can be a real problem in legal documents. A sentence is syntactically ambiguous when the grammar of the sentence allows for more than one interpretation of its meaning. Mistaking properties of the parts for properties of the whole.