Faculty members should use C and continuously evaluate and revise C forms of assessment that require active and creative thought, and promote learning opportunities for students. Reduce opportunities to engage in academic dishonesty . Prevention is a critical line of defense against academic dishonesty. Students should not be tempted or induced to engage in acts of academic dishonesty by ambiguous policies, undefined or unrealistic standards for collaboration, inadequate classroom management, or poor examination security. Challenge academic dishonesty when it occurs.
Students observe how faculty members behave, and what values they embrace.
Faculty members who ignore or trivialize academic dishonesty send the message that the core values of academic life, and community life in general, are not worth any significant effort to enforce. Help define and support campus-wide academic integrity standards. Acts of academic dishonesty by individual students can occur across artificial divisions of departments and schools. Definitions of Academic Misconduct by Professor Lyn Bennett 8 Center for Academic Integrity.