Stouffer claims that she did not immediately take action against Rowling because she was not aware of the books until last year when they became increasingly popular. She says she read part of the books and immediately contacted Scholastic, Inc. about the issue. I don't like the fact that someone as powerful as Time-Warner and Scholastic Inc., have the ability to steal someone's property, limit their media exposure of the nasty deed, and then call them a liar. She goes on to say that this allows them influence over the sale of products, and gives them the opportunity to sway public opinion, including matters dealing with her case. Not only has Rowling been accused of stealing ideas for stories, some of her stories have been banned.
Some parents disapprove of their content.
People also say that the books are too violent.