We can't actually prove the existence of dreams, yet a great deal of dream study has been done in psychology. If that's your model, it won't. This has nothing to do with validation. In the context of the sentence, I was referring to the 'mainstreaming' of chiropractic that Joshua mentioned. I also don't think science dominates - it just is.
Science is a human endeavour to make sense of the world.
Without people, there is no science. If chiropractic had a legitimate system of philosophy it would use that system to interpret the meanings and implications of science, to further a system of ethics, and that philosophy would be ever-changing as science itself changed. Thanx for your reply.