But we might end up with a bit of a complex if they're not more gentle with us. First it was Richard Krajicek getting in a dig at CNN's coverage of tennis back in 1996. He claimed showing a few points and a results board was hardly comprehensive. I'm not sure Richard grasped that we do that with every sport because that's the nature of the show.
Short highlights are essential in our half-hour offering.
Brevity is the key as we sweep the globe to cover as many events as possible in a limited amount of time. We rarely please all the people all the time, although we do our best. One concerned our constant reminder that although he was about to be crowned world number one, it was somewhat ridiculous because he'd lost in his opening round in six straight tournaments. That was a criticism of the ranking system, not him. He would later question our editorial content.