No, I do not see a need for reevaluation of that claim. That is what you are doing in a futile attempt to discredit each of them. I am not the one who is equating science and materialism. Every time you've attempted to support or defend materialism, you mention science. Anyone reading this exchange can see this.
True science makes observational claims of only what can be verified.
Nor did I say that you did. I'm just pointing out a flaw in your claim. Observational claims are made all the time because things are observed all the time. These observations are also reported in the hopes that others may be able to make the same observations. However, that is never a given until such subsequent corroborating observations actually are made.