Likewise, Vallier has not met the terms and conditions of his suspended sentence. The sentencing court conditioned Vallier's suspended sentence upon his completion of the sexual offender treatment program while incarcerated in prison. Vallier has not completed this program. Unlike Williams , Vallier had the opportunity to complete his sexual offender treatment, only he refused to cooperate. Vallier's failure to complete his sexual offender treatment is of such a nature as to require his continued incarceration.
Several reasons exist to keep sexual offenders incarcerated.
They are kept confined not only for their own rehabilitation, but also to protect society from them. While incarcerated, he refused to cooperate with his sexual offender treatment program. Further, the District Court heard substantial evidence why Vallier should not be inflicted upon a community. At the hearing to decide whether to revoke Vallier's suspended sentence the District Court heard compelling testimony that Vallier should not be released into a community. Donald Kelly, a probation and parole officer, testified that he believed Vallier constituted a significant risk to a community.