Thus qualia are original, what it is to be a certain sort of space-time geometry configuration. This claim, picked nice and clean, is most interesting, ontologically speaking. At most locations in configured space-time geometry what it is to be that kind of geometry is nothing at all, or not much, depending on how much of a panpsychist you are. So at certain addresses in space time, what it is to be that space-time configuration, is to have qualitative experience. At such addresses there are lacunae for science, for what it is like to be something lies outside science's objective purview.
Science leads to knowledge, but being something is categorically distinct from knowing it.
Its scope and limits. Of all world entities, each of us surely has a right to say what it is to be the one seen in the mirror. Sorry, they didn't leave any room. Qualia are inferential, not experienced. So yes, there is configured space-time geometry, and there are certain addresses where to be that geometry is always to find oneself already in a world.