We no longer take into consideration information not available through the computer. As long as we have enough material, we're satisfied. We don't make the extra effort to search for more complete information or to verify citations. Nor do we read the entire document any longer. A quick perusal of an abstract may put us on the track of important and relevant articles, yet this is analogous to relying on Cliff Notes instead of an actual reading of a novel or play.
Useful information consists of correct data that has relevance and purpose.
In addition to having the information, we need to realize its value and this requires analytical capabilities. It takes reflection and understanding to convert it into a body of knowledge. This leaves fundamental access decisions to the agency. The courts may provide further interpretation if the matter appears in litigation. Court decisions involving computer records apply analogies with paper documents.