Epistemologically you are in stable equilibrium. Pragmatism, on the other hand, asks its usual question. False ideas are those that we cannot. This thesis is what I have to defend. The truth of an idea is not a stagnant property inherent in it.
Truth happens to an idea.
It becomes true, is made true by events. Its validity is the process of its valid-ation. And often agreement will only mean the negative fact that nothing contradictory from the quarter of that reality comes to interfere with the way in which our ideas guide as elsewhere. To copy a reality is, indeed, one very important way of agreeing with it, but it is far from being essential. The essential thing is the process of being guided.