The product comes from Australia, where it is well known. Our tests proved Vet to be lacking in a number of areas, however. User interface quirks and the lack of a scheduling capability make Vet a product in need of additional work before it can compete successfully in the United States. When preparing a scan, you can only select as many folders and files as you see in the current Explorer list box, an annoying limitation. You can only scan files using a limiting inclusion method.
Vet scans either all files or only selected file types.
Since it's not readily apparent which file types viruses can infect, Vet's capability is less safe. Although scanning all files is the safest way, you may sometimes want to select which scans you want. We would prefer the program to exclude the file types known not to be infected rather than to add file types thought to be vulnerable. Like ThunderByte, Vet lacks a scheduler. Here, the lack of a scheduler requires you to perform occasional full scans manually in order to ensure the safety of your system.