Sam Vaknin argues the case for in an accompanying article . Amid the general triumphalism and euphoria of the media and the diplomats, many commentators wisely remind us of the unfinished business, upcoming hurdles and unresolved conflicts that face Serbia and its neighbors. But some go even further, notably in recent CER articles. These views go beyond healthy skepticism. They distort the causes and consequences of the events of the last few weeks, which undeniably portend fundamental changes.
Undue cynicism stems in part from misunderstandings and stereotypes about Serbia.
Such oversimplifications led to a misreading of the situation, and now they underlie doubts about the meaningfulness of Milo evi 's fall. A more nuanced and accurate view of Serbia, however, gives reason for greater optimism. What is not well understood is that a basis for self-examination already exists in what is called civil society among journalists, academics, cultural and political figures who have been asking these questions since long before Milo evi was voted out and then forced out of power. To be sure, these people have been largely marginalized, often villified. But the new political and cultural openness promises an expanded platform for their message.