Central to the nature of any religion is the concept of faith, a concept that science has strived so hard to destroy the neccecity of. Despite its efforts, scientists are as dependant on faith as the most pious members of society. This attitude of fides quarrem intellectum , faith seeking reason, has been ironically transposed in science. Now faith is governed by what is reasoned. So many scientists argue that religion is unfounded because it is built on the grounds of faith.
Science requires equally as much faith.
Science has no more proof or disproof of any deitiy than any religion, yet scientists claim inconsitancies in the stories of a religion as grounds for doubt. People in society accept the idea that nuclei of atoms consist of protons and neutrons on as much evidence as they have that Muhammed was a prophet. Of course this can all be proven provided the right equipment and experiments are used. The sheer monetary cost and complexity of things such as particle colliders inhibit the typical member of society from ever proving any of this to themselves. The scientists, of course biased, dictate that they should be belived due to this evidence.