But the sceptics who said these innovative vessels would become obsolete appear to have missed the mark. Certainly, there have been cargo claims resulting from the use of open-hatch vessels, and some of these claims even related to water damage, but it is argued that these claims would have been filed regardless of vessel design parameters. In many cases it was found to be the container itself that was at fault, with the design of the vessel bearing little relation to the claim.
Shipowners are well aware that some containers' watertightness are suspect.
Nedlloyd's apparent reluctance to order further vessels of this type is believed to have stemmed from its pre-merger financial status rather than any inherent design misgivings. The shortfall has not been brought about by fears of excessive cargo claims, shipping line executives say. Delivery of cargo without a BOL is the single largest cause of claims against liner and port agents, he said. To that end, ITIC has detailed the golden rules for cargo delivery, aimed at enlightening agents on how to ensure that claims are cut to an absolute minimum. Failing that, a letter of indemnity must be obtained.