On the opposite end of the continuum is the atomistic approach in which students concentrate on parts of the lesson, often without interrelating or integrating the information. Although both styles are important in learning, the predominant use of one style over another can be detrimental to the learning process. In terms of study habits, students who tend to use the global approach spend a longer time studying, find the material more interesting, and feel that studying is gratifying Students who use the atomistic approach spend a great deal of time on rote memorization of facts and may find studying tedious and unrewarding. Successful learning depends on the student's ability to combine the best of both learning styles. The global approach learner must learn to pay attention to details and the atomistic approach learner needs to view the details in relation to the larger picture.
Students tend to have a preference for one learning style over another.
For instance, in large survey courses, it is easy for students to be overwhelmed by the amount of factual information and turn to a more atomistic approach. Consequently, they may focus on the details of the course and lose sight of the overall implications of the conceptual and theoretical course material. When this happens, students need to be directed toward developing a deeper approach to studying the subject matter. On the other hand, students predominantly using a global approach may need to be reminded that a certain amount of factual and detailed information is needed to support conceptual and theoretical assertions. Although students will probably choose a college major compatible with their learning style, they still must take courses in other departments to meet the general education requirements of the B.A. or B.S. degree.