They contend that modern society is obsessed with thinness and blames heavier individuals for their weight problems. They say the situation has created an acceptable prejudice against overweight people, which can translate into anything from the everyday ridicule they receive from stand-up comedians to institutionalized discrimination in housing, employment, education and other areas. Critics of obesity-discrimination laws argue that they are not only superfluous but also dangerous. Acceptance of the overweight can imply approval of unhealthy habits. It is a personal problem rather than an inherent condition and should be treated as such.
Studies vary widely in their findings.
Some studies have found that 50 percent to 75 percent of obesity cases are caused by genetic influences. But a more recent study, published in the January 2000 Journal of The American Dietetic Association , found that eating habits primarily determine obesity. Both sides of the obesity rights debate are closely watching a proposed piece of obesity legislation currently before the House Subcommittee on Health and the Environment. So far, size-discrimination bans rarely have been used where they are applicable. Santa Cruz law-enforcement officials note that their size discrimination ordinance has not cost them any additional money.