Even while he contributes something useful. That will be useful. That is, it does not imply any agreement or common understanding. One of the view than Im an continuing to try and makes sensible is one which reveals vision as an emrgent phenomenon. I suggest that vision is something that emerges before words from the background o social understanding in its particular unique expression of both a culture and the individual in it.
Visions are an emergent integration.
Taken from there to an external and specific tool for alignment or motivation, they lose the precious nature and become both trivialised and the source of mischief. This useage of vision does not preclude the possibility of organisational vision - given my assumption that an organisation itself is an intelligent entity which has emerged from intelligent sources. An organisational vision, however, is also emergent and is not located in any particular place nor limited to any particular specifics or form. Another view that I am continuing to try and make sensible is one which does not require any of commonly accepted psychology but only explanation resting on what is available to sensory awareness. I suggest that the power is in the dialogue itself.