In the past, the Christian Reconstruction Movement was torn by strife largely generated by personality conflicts and comparatively secondary doctrinal issues. Regrettably, the present heresy springs from a particular historical antecedent. To be quite frank, some of the younger men in the movement are ready to make some fundamental innovations in the existing theonomy framework. No movement stays in the same mold forever. That's what progress in theology is all about.
Young men innovate.
This theological progress and creativity must occur within the strictures of orthodox Christianity, however, or it subverts the Faith. Recently a prominent Christian Reconstructionist chastised those of us forthrightly exposing this deviation from orthodox Christianity. Having said this, I am not at all impressed by the way critics of full preterism are arguing their case. I have challenged full preterists to present solid exegesis to support their position. They in turn laugh at attempts to refute full preterism by an appeal to the creeds and name calling.