I have not misapplied any logic or lent support to arguments against my claims. This was merely your nonchalant accusation. Perhaps, you now wish to reevaluate this claim. I'm not doing that. That is what you are doing in a futile attempt to discredit each of them.
True science makes observational claims of only what can be verified.
Subsequent corroborating observations provide verification. This is a presupposition that is unverifiable. That evidence comes from the fact that every single observation and experiment which has ever been conducted has resulted in the demonstration that everything which exists has a physical basis. When all evidence supports a proposition and none contradicts it, the proposition can be safely accepted with confidence. None of that is necessary.