He highlighted recent published data on the University's competitive position with respect to faculty salaries and national rank. It is clear that faculty compensation at the University of Minnesota needs to be addressed. The University cannot be competitive if it does not have competitive salaries. He urged that the Board of Regents not approve a budget if it is inconsistent with the resolution of the faculty compensation issue. Adams stated that tenure is a significant part of the working condition.
Significant improvements are under review.
It is clear that a number of external factions are anxious to be a part of changing the tenure code at the University of Minnesota and there will be enormous external pressure to delay tenure change. He urged the Board to recognize that a delay will only serve to invite a malady of activity and will make it more difficult to come to a reasonable solution. Adams concluded by asking Board members to actively engage in challenging the pervasive mood that is surrounding the University at this time. He asked that the Regents personally challenge any statements that they know to be unfair or untrue. As critical issues arise, it is vitally important that accurate and fair statements be made about the University.