I do my best to evaluate the arguments as presented by the debaters in the round. I am very likely to read evidence. I like good analytic arguments and prefer you to indict one anothers evidence. I prefer good arguments which make sense and -are supported by good .
Speed is pleasurable as long as it is comprehensible.
If I can't understand you I will let you know. The negative does not have to win a disad to win the debate. The affirmative must win an advantage. If the affs only job on this topic is to prove discrimination exists and that Title VII isn't perfect thats a pretty easy burden to meet. The hard part of being affirmative is offering a solution which will work.