Creationists pick holes in the theory of evolution, but don't seem to have one of their own which can be falsified in turn. Any literal reading of Genesis 1, does not correspond to the evidentiary data base on many levels. Some people in the 19th century thought there was nothing left to discover. It would seem to me that to follow such a thought process would be as discouraging to research as anything design theory might bring up. The other thing I find disturbing about the Craig62 comments is the hypersensitivity to any criticism.
Scientific theories arise and are thrown out all the time.
This is good. It means progress is being made.