The result will be a greater respect for educators. Questions II and III are intertwined. As described above, we can envision the benefits that a proactive, consolidated group of teachers would have on education. Although, curriculum has not yet been mentioned specifically in this essay. In short, instead of empowering teachers to make a difference, policy-makers have decided to go in the opposite direction by disemboweling teachers through micromanagement.
Teachers are at the mercy of a top-heavy bureaucracy when it comes to curriculum.
Of course, teachers land up doing what they please within the classroom, but they do so not without risk. Teachers who do not meet certain objectives can hurt the following classes that inherit students who do not have the prerequisite abilities necessary to be successful in those classes. Allowing teachers to exist in lone wolf systems is detrimental and is a dangerous consequence many systems face. The political tide will change once teachers are encouraged to remain connected to their curricula. Teachers are forced to modify course content at an alarming rate due to the outside committees that dictate it.