More questions follow. Ms. Friedlander forms her questions to determine if Amy really can do these things. Amy's sharp responses demonstrate she was a change agent at the organizations. Amy's responses demonstrate she had significant control and decision-making power. Then comes a classic question.
Silence follows, but it's more thoughtful than awkward.
Reflecting on this answer later, Ms. Friedlander says there's no right way to respond to this question. It's designed to show how a candidate chooses to learn from his or her failures or, in Amy's case, lack of failures. There's always something to be learned. As the interview progresses, it becomes clear that Amy's experience doesn't match Precipio's needs. She has the right education and business skills, but not enough technical skills.