Because the appeal in the 2600 case is scheduled to be heard this coming thursday I have written an article which I hope folks will find enlightening. I read your article, but found it a little unclear. You seem to be saying that you have a vague uneasiness about the use of the term enlarge , and although I agree that it me be a fact that you feel such unease, I don't see that it's very germane to anything else. As a minor aside, its is a possessive pronoun, and it's is a contraction for it is .
Writing is difficult , and writing well is even harder.
The DCMA is a strong weapon in the hand of content providers. I don't like it because it seems to be the handle to forbid reengineering - something that should be possible to the extend of interfacing in my humble opinion. And don't forget the recent case of that scientific paper on the SDMI challenge that got retracted.