Hallett's remarks Without reading it, I could have failed the paper because it is obviously a research project that requires documentation of sources. This paper has no works-cited page, which is an alphabetical, detailed, specifically designed listing of sources from which the writer quoted or paraphrased material. Overall, the writing is uneven, suggesting that even the person who donated the paper to School Sucks has plagiarized. Strong passages are embroidered together by extremely weak phrases and sentences. An erratic application of strong vocabulary words also contributes to this final effect of an uneven text.
Sentences begin with quotes.
Historical figures are referred to by his or her first name. Titles of essays lack quotation marks. Titles of books are not italicized or underlined. There is an abundance of sentimental phrasing. Specific information is included without source documentation.