2.05 provides that 1. Statutes in the penal code should not be construed as imposing strict liability unless they are violations. This statute authorizes imprisonment and so does not impose strict liability under this rule. Statutes not in the penal code do not impose strict liability if a jail term is authorized. Therefore, this statute does not impose strict liability.
Statute has no mens rea term.
Did Andy consciously disregard a substantial and unjustifiable risk, etc. Analysis similar to that in I above. This is not a strict liability element for the reasons discussed there, and the gap filler is recklessness. If it were strict liability, B would have no defense under this section. Prosecutor argues that a law abiding person wouldn't rely on a trial court opinion, especially in the face of the new sign.