If no one tells me to evaluate the round otherwise, I will defer to my own interpretation. I definitely enjoy kritik debates. The perm can also function as a counter-kritik. I hold Kritiks to a somewhat higher standard than others. Generally, I am pretty picky on the specificity of the link.
Uniqueness is the key.
Especially for Clinton, you need to have a pretty tight story. I like clear, developed impact scenarios. That might or might not need to include some uniqueness discussion concerning the impacts. I would rather vote on a disad that prevent a few nuclear wars than T. Mini-disads or big turn stories on case are effective. If you want me to read a card, tell me so and why.