That being the case, I base my position upon what the facts and evidence will or will not support. At numerous times during the discussions you ask me to define terms - obstensibly because you say I am being ambiguous or injecting theological or moral arguments into the discussion. It's not my fault if I'm causing you to put a little thought into what you are saying. Most arguments based on religious dogma are full of buzzwords and catchphrases which sound great, but, in actuality, have as little real meaning as most political speeches. I have no trouble answering any of your questions.
Solid arguments hold up under critical scrutiny.
I'm sure that you are aware that given the inherent limitations of language and communication, it's impossible to fully define or explain any given word or concept. Conceptually, a dictionary can be seen as an incredibly tangled endless loop. These definitions all consist of more words, each with their own meanings. Another red herring. If any concept is fact-based, it can be explained clearly and adequately even using a language like English.