While I disagree, I respect your right to draw different conclusions about issues that aren't IMO Christian essentials. One can raise any number of valid issues of philosophy, methodology, inference etc. with evolution theorists. Christians can and should raise valid scientific issues with scientists of all stripes.
Science can be wrong, and our interpretation of Scripture can be wrong.
As long as Christians participate in debates recognizing that fact, they will be appreciated. But if the debators on the evolution side for example suspect that the Christians are simply trying to bolster what their interpretation of Scripture tells them must be true, the Christians' motives will be suspect. You're talking about various randomization appraches to design, including genetic algorithms. This sort of thing has been done, for a number of years, with quite a bit of progress made recently due both to improvements in computing power and improvements in the theory. I'm not sure the analogy with artificial selection is a good one.