This requires an active attitude of our gay and lesbian members. I find it remarkable that there is relatively little discussion on the rights and opportunities of gays and lesbians on the working place. Striking as well is that judges motivate badly in cases of equal opportunities. And even the Supreme Court hesitates to establish an aggravated motivation duty for judges. To answer the question whether discrimination is in play, he or she often has to make difficult decisions.
Subtle differences are very hard to motivate.
I totally disagree with this rejection of aggravated motivation duty. Cases like discrimination need full transparency to be able to judge the arguments properly. In a society like ours discussion is needed to be able to determine an open opinion. This current attitude conveys the feeling of back room politics, where the opinions of the judges can be decisive. This is especially important with an independent judiciary that has to practice full transparency in cases that concern our total society.