However, under Colgate, the terminated dealer must show that there was actually an agreement between the supplier and the second dealer. The mere fact that the second dealer had complained and that the supplier subsequently terminated the first dealer was not sufficient to establish an agreement. Further, it must be shown that the rationale for the termination was the dealer s price cutting, not its violation of a nonprice restriction. Has to be actual agreement b. Easy ones are tying worthless product to worthful product b.
Seller has sufficient economic power to appreciably restrain in the tied product market iv.
International Salt a. 3.must be a cherant economic for treating the tied product as distinct d. Relevant makets are where they compete, and not where they are located 1.Vertical Mergers a. Even if the numbers are small, things can still be inferred ii. 3.There could be a triggering of reactive mergers toward oligopoly b.