Insect and disease processes not considered. Stand resiliency index untested. Not clear how alternatives were actually evaluated. Protection of spotted owl insufficient. Long-term projections for large trees indefensible.
Silvicultural systems don t match models.
No guidance for aquatic restoration. Private lands not involved in cumulative effects assessments. Road database used in EIS is out of date and understates road density. It is not conclusive. All committee members may not agree with assessments and narratives.