It did not say whether it should be an active plan, one calling for cutting, or a passive plan, where no cutting would be done. Either way, the assessment cautioned that environmental considerations be fully taken into account. D.C. But a report by associate biology professor Linda Fink, detailing the biological impacts of proposed cuts and criticizing the plan, did not sway directors. Brower said a majority of the faculty was against the plan. The Student Government Association took a similar stance.
Undergraduates do and the staff does as well.
In a news release, Sweet Briar President Elisabeth S. Muhlenfeld said the decision-making process was deliberate and inclusive. While the board examined each position with the good of the entire community in mind, the release stated, it proceeded only after lengthy discussion because of sincere appreciation for all viewpoints. Even after the decision, Brower said the matter deserves further discussion. There is no huge rush to cut it. And the economic advantages aren't such that that college needs to do it now.