Imagine, when computers and net connections become as widespread as telephones and automobiles, that the public must then approve of all new laws once the president signs them. For any law to become a law, at least, say, two-thirds of the electorate must approve. Because, if voting is as easy as reading your computer screen over a cup of coffee, voter apathy means something. It means a hell of a lot more than lack of time between picking the kids up at school and watching the Simpsons on television. The only thing left for it to mean is lack of support for the proposed laws in question.
Voting becomes more of a responsibility than it ever was.
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice. Imagine, further, that anyone can register proposed laws, or repeal of laws, or even acquitals of prisoners. They can put forth their arguments on the net, create their own Internet site to display those arguments. But there are dangers as well. I envisioned a system, above, in which the popular branch balances the other branches.