I mean this was a story told through the contemporaneous documents. And I think it is unlikely that statements and public forum are going to signal anything of any significance. So we'll wait and see. Jim, from the Department's point of view, if we see that there is a serious proposal addressing those significant competitive issues, consumer harm and innovation, I believe that such a settlement will be possible. But I do believe you have to come to grips with those findings because I believe they're correct, and a remedy that doesn't address those findings I think would be a mistake for the Department and an abdication of our responsibility to enforce the Sherman Act.
Settlement usually involves give and take on both sides.
I'm reading from you that the Justice Department doesn't have a position of give on this. No, I don't think that is right. There are a variety of different ways to address the problem. I don't have a position that says this is not a monetary settlement. We have no private interest in the outcome.