In case you haven't noticed, in baseball, the home team bats second. It's not science. It's not logic. Its a philosohpical view of origins. Its not science, but it uses some science.
Science is based upon evidence.
Its not logic, but it uses logic. Your denial of its logical foundation is rooted in the assumption of universal materialism's validity, which you have not established. It is constructed solely upon begged questions, circular reasoning and other logical fallacies. Nothing else is possible if your argument has any hope of coherency. Then, I suggest that you get on with it instead of perpetuating your logical fallacies.