Approved stamped copies were presented to Staff prior to the hearing. Additional information, including a copy of the plat, requested by Mr. Counts had been submitted also. Due to the design of the lot, it is difficult to determine the front of the residence. The attempt is to provide the homeowner a large rear year area for installation of a pool i nstead of an area that will be unusable for the enjoyment of the family. The intent is to utilize the lot in a manner that is consistent with the street.
Utility easements are consistent with surrounding homes and are within setback requirements.
Mr. Counts pointed out that although there has been a preliminary approval by Litchfield Greens, the Board is not bound by that, the Board can make its own judgment if this will or will not be detrimental to other homes in the vicinity. Vice Chair Charnetsky stated that the architect review committee only reviews additions and changes to existing homes and that all new construction goes to the developer for review. Mr. Romack also stated there is an existing condition like this on lot number 277, which is a mirror of this lot. The setbacks will be nearly identical. Chair Lindenlaub closed the public hearing.