That is, some of the papers are published. Many fall by the wayside, not passing muster after tough critiques by colleagues, who may find fault with the data, with the interpretations of the data, or with the way in which the data and ideas are presented. Some journals have rejection rates of more than 50 percent. This year HVO scientists have published, or have had accepted for publication, some 26 papers. None was rejected.
Scientists talk to one another.
Meetings such as the one this week are highlighted by formal lectures, lasting 10-15 minutes, in which new ideas and information are conveyed in highly condensed presentations, with time for only a few questions. After the talks, those most interested in the subjects round up the speakers and find out more. Some talks are dreadful, some inspiring. The discussions continue into the evening hours as good and bad ideas are bandied about informally. This year HVO scientists presented or contributed to 29 formal talks, seven at this week's meeting in San Francisco.