D is charged with assaulting V in a bar. D does not deny that an altercation occurred but claims that he acted in self-defense. Before V testifies, the prosecution seeks to prove V s reputation for truthfulness through the testimony of her priest. As expected, V testifies that D initiated the altercation in question. On cross-examination, D s counsel asks V whether she intended to initiate a civil suit against D for injuries allegedly incurred in the altercation.
V responds in the negative.
If permitted, CW will testify that V s reputation in the community for truthfulness is a joke. D testifies in his own defense and claims that V initiated the altercation. Briefly explain what these categories are and the policy justification for excluding them from the reach of FRE 802. Certain prior statements of testifying witnesses. Give a brief explanation in support of your answer.