It's absurd to suggest that the psychiatric profession is biased in favor of puritanical sexual mores or political conservatism. But there is another reason to oppose this resolution. Simply put, the principle of non-discrimination is too vague to apply in practice. In short, we cannot ask others to adhere to our principles until we, ourselves, can explain what they mean. He is a representative for the Undergraduate Council.
Transgendered individuals have the same academic ability as other students.
Their beliefs or lifestyle may be different from others, which is a basis on which someone might discriminate against them. In that respect the reasoning for including gender identity in a non-discrimination policy is along the same lines as the reasoning for the inclusion of religion and homosexuality. I believe that a change in the non-discrimination policy is necessary to ensure that everyone has the same rights. He is vice president of the Undergraduate Council.