That is not even a question anymore. It is equally inappropriate for one special interest group with a religious model of what sexuality education should look like to impose that model on ALL children in the district. While explicit discussions of sexual behavior with 4th graders may not be age-appropriate, they are a life and death issue for high schoolers. Where sexuality education is concerned, it is the school's job to present to students the most current and accurate medical and scientific information available, not to pass judgment on what adults do in their private lives. It's only when we get into issues of sexuality that things get dicey.
Schools deal with moral issues all the time.
It's absurd to suggest that they don't or shouldn't, because an issue has been raised with which one disagrees. It is beyond me why some people find ideas so threatening. If your kids have been told something with which you disagree, use that as an opportunity to talk to them. I would urge Ms. Johnson to please consider the ramifications of making such inflammatory and un -researched accusations. I would hope that she would take an active role as an educational leader in promoting cooperation and not division among all the players in the process of educating kids.