While separation is warranted in some instances, we don't believe it should be the basis for developing a strategy for dogs. The reasons set out below have mostly been stated elsewhere in this report but warrant repeating at this point. Separation means that few parks are inevitably made available for dogs because of scarcity of park resources. A park which is beyond walking distance from home is unlikely to be used by dog owners on a daily basis. It is also unavailable for anyone without regular access to a car.
Separation means that dogs miss the benefits of a wide range of outings.
Separation concentrates potential conflicts into isolated spots. Local authorities may also have less incentive to maintain parks designated for dogs. The main tool for reducing crime is to attract more park activity. Dogs and their owners can play a part in reducing crime especially as workers tend to take their dogs out at non-peak times, i.e. in the evening and early morning. Integration means flexibility - it is amenable to changes in policy or emphasis in the future.