The above tables indicate that the emphasis will have to be different as between urban and rural areas. In urban areas, the required emphasis is more on reducing institutional and other barriers to livelihood opportunities, infrastructure and services. However, this does not mean that there should be two fundamentally separate approaches. Development of a society and economy is a dynamic process. The resulting population settlement is ongoing, not static, so the actual boundaries of rural and urban areas are constantly shifting.
Spatial mobility allows individuals to respond to economic opportunity and helps to manage risks.
Spatial agglomeration is good for both rural and urban populations. The increased concentration of population and economic activity through the process of urbanization reduces costs of production and service delivery, enlarges markets for goods and services, and creates a wider labor pool. Urban areas account for the major share of income growth in most countries and of fiscal revenues. Rural areas can often be more prosperous and productive when they are close to urban centers which provide major markets, financial resources, and employment options. Healthy and buoyant urban economies are essential not only to eliminate poverty within their own boundaries but also to create prospects for eliminating rural poverty altogether.