It seems like they all miss much more important considerations and the issue is broader than just the China debate. The major nuclear powers have agreed to eliminate nuclear weapons at a UN treaty review . While it is generally agreed that media censorship can be quite physical and violent in regimes that are not democratic or free, even developed countries are seeing some violent forms of censorship . The recent political protests such as the Seattle protests against the WTO, the Washington, D.C protests against the IMF and World Bank, the anti-Debt protests in London and so on, are showing an increase in violent forms of censorship against independent media journalists. This is on top of the already market and commercial censorship already recognized to be in place in most western nations.
Some European countries provide prescription drugs even cheaper.
That this is government interference. Yes, interference in corporate profits but support for public health. In the developing countries the situation can be even worse, because these companies prefer to produce drugs that will provide a return on investment, which are not always the drugs that are most needed. However, the Milosevic response has seen a harsh crackdown, attempting to crush opponents and silence the independent media, which is leading to real fears of civil war. While NATO have admitted that they used depleted Uranium, they are still not forthcoming with critical information about how it was used .