When Bible believing scholars disagree in this area the rest of need to be cautious and non-dogmatic over our differences. Another factor is our fallible human understanding. While God has given us intelligence, it is a limited intelligence. Our understanding of divine truth is further clouded by sin. While we must ever seek to overcome these obstacles, it is surely apparent that we shall never do so completely this side of heaven.
Understanding is like holiness.
We must ever strive for perfection, all the while clinging to the cross of Jesus whose blood covers our imperfections. The third option mentioned above is to simply state the restoration principle, but make no effort to spell out the basic teachings of Scripture, leaving that work to each local church. Those who follow this option would simply affirm their commitment to Jesus alone, along with their willingness to abide by the teachings of Scripture alone. The problem here is the implication that the Bible says nothing clearly, and therefore each local congregation must determine their beliefs and practices in isolation from other congregations. A revelation which reveals nothing clearly is no revelation at all.