Just Reply to this message with your answers. If you want to give the test to others and give their answers here, also, that would be nice. We have at least one representative from the NET team who is a member of this list and your answers will likely be of help to him. Fieldtesting is a scientific process. The hypotheses below are only that, hypotheses, which need to be scientifically tested.
Testing can confirm or disconfirm the hypotheses.
If testing confirms a hypothesis, then, following the scientific method, revision is called for. The same process can be followed for fieldtesting any other English version. Following are just some examples for testing which I spotted this morning as I skimmed the beginning of Matthew. For best results, an entire translation should be fieldtested and revised based on fieldtesting results. It makes no difference whether or not a version is produced by native speakers in a majority language, such as English, Spanish, Japanese, or Russian, with a team of highly skilled exegetes, or a team of native speakers of a minority language who may not have as much exegetical training.