I'm sure there exist many people who would accept these lies at face value and would then conclude that yours is a position of truthfulness. This means that in the beginning, there must have been a God or even a greater presence to create atoms. Even if what you had said above were true, that the big bang did need energy to get started, we would not be forced to accept your conclusion that this was done by a god. If the universe can be shown to have started with zero energy and zero order, then you would need to show what role a god could have played in the existence of the universe. You have not improved this situation any by lying to me in order to convince me that yours is a position of truthfulness.
Valid evidence is truthful evidence.
If you know something about creation or any other reasons for the occurrences we see around us, then post it on your website. I have posted several discussions about how the universe could possibly have come to be. If you are interested, you might wish to type the word universe into our search engine and see what you come up with. If nothing else, you will know what my positions are and are not on this matter, and you will know not to make the mistake that so many creationists make in misrepresenting what scientists, particularly physicists, say about science. Stranger things have happened.