I will interrupt your speech if I can't understand you. I mean that you are utterly incomprehensible and that you need to repeat yourself if you expect it to count. I mean that I can barely understand you, not that you are incomprehensible. To win, the negative needs a clear interpretation, that the aff doesn't meet, that is better than the affs interpretation. Speak slowly when you debate topicality.
Topical counterplans are almost always legitimate.
So are counterplans that only do, part of the plan. Conditionality is not indefensible. International fiat can probably be defended as well. Legitimate and nothing else. If you want me to do something else, you need to explain why.