But even if XYZ breached the lst k for 5,000 sacks does this breach justify cancellation of the second k - probably not. In general breaches under one k have no effect on separate k's between the parties. If ABC knew of k with MNO is this enough to make it liable or must it know of inability to cover. This is subject to an offset to the Seller for damages. Seller's damages 1.
Statutory language refers only to salvage sale.
A. ABC would want to introduce usage of trade to show that while parties used the word bag they meant sacks since in the trade cryptolite is always sold in sacks. Both parties were in the trade 2. need regularity of observance in trade 3. B. Usage of trade comes in under 2-202 despite the merger clause in the contract. If it is inconsistent with written terms may be excluded a close here.