A. First, as a way of introduction, you are responsible for UCC 2-202, but you are not responsible for the Parol Evidence Rule that we studied last semester. That said, you need to read the section very carefully to see whether it is talking about complete or partial integration.
Subsection be mentions complete and exclusive statement of the terms.
We discussed this as being complete integration. This refers to a statement I made in class about the case. It is not a legal point. It is simple an observation that contracts of the nature therein used would usually be completely integrated. Obviously in a fact pattern you would want to be told this or have facts sufficient to argue about, under 2-202.