Nowhere in these proceedings is there any indication that either the zoning board or the planning commission found any shortcoming in this particular dimension, and the lower court was fully justified in sustaining compliance. The second dimensional issue, raised by the appellants for the first time here, seems to be that the proposal does not take into account Article 25.101 of the South Burlington zoning regulations. We are left without evidentiary guidance as to a different place for its claimed true location. Perhaps the width has already been incorporated into Williston Road, possibly all on the north side, or perhaps divided by some unknown measure between the north and south sides. No reversible error appears here.
Traffic flow is the concern of the third issue.
The conditional use approved in 1995 provided for a two-way access onto Williston Road. This access was 220 feet from the Spear Street intersection measured along the property line from the nearest edge of the driveway to the closest point of the intersection. It is the contention of the appellants that this measurement should be made from the edge of the flare of the driveway where it meets the east-bound travel lane of the street. This yields a separation distance of some 170 feet along the curb line. However, measuring along the property line of the approved proposal still gives a separation distance of 210 feet, as demonstrated by the exhibit.