Thus, Blackburn may be instructive on the issue of when to measure value once it has been determined that the value of the property rather than recovery of the property itself is the proper section 550 remedy . The decision of the court in fashioning a remedy in that case may be limited to the facts of that case. In this case, that issue is not reached because it has been determined that recovery of the property in the form of avoidance of the lien, not an award of monetary value, is the appropriate remedy. Unlike in Blackburn , Debtors here are still in possession of the vehicle, and no good faith purchaser exists. Having determined that, under these circumstances, the property interest itself should be recovered, the question of when to measure value has no meaning in this case.
Trustee seeks costs and prejudgment interest.
The specifications for this recovery are sketchy. There are no costs itemized or proven for recovery. There is no provision for recovery of attorney fees and expenses in section 547 or section 550. Since the amount of the monetary recovery in the form of payments made to GMAC has been increasing since this adversary proceeding was filed, there is no clear showing of any fixed liability as to which a recovery of interest might be calculated. The evidence and law on this prayer for relief does not support a recovery.