No images here out of since I have not had the time to search for non-copyrighted photographs or drawings. Apart from the widening of the outer circle, our only evidence on side B seems to be in cell 30, signs 1 and 2. This could easily have been a correction, or, more likely, just an artistic or personal oddity of the scribe. It is unlikely that two completely unrelated writings would be present on one and the same object. The sign frequencies on the two sides would be helpful if only the inscription were twice as long.
Statistical analysis is of little to no use to the present inscription.
The inscriptions reach the edge of the disk at the same point on both sides. The next largest obvious structural division, after the two sides, are the cells of signs. There is, however, a larger, though more obscure structural unit. Every so many signs a small diagonal or vertical mark, always on the outside side of the particular circle of inscriptions it occurs in, was applied by the scribe. In every cell that contains such markings, they are found under the left most pictograph of the cell.