Audience reaction to this topic was extremely positive, indicating the importance of chiropractic theory to drive the profession's research efforts. To me, this indicated a coming of age for the chiropractic academy. When people who are leading the development of knowledge for our profession can discuss and debate without rancor such topics as theory development, it speaks well for the future of chiropractic. Dr. Martin contended that chiropractic has survived, despite strong opposition, for the simple reason that it helps people. Chiropractic will continue to survive and thrive for that very reason.
Theories are out there to be tested.
It is good that we have gained the maturity to be able to test ours without fear. Others praised the friendly, open manner in which participants with opposing beliefs participated in the discussions. Participants agreed to disagree in a friendly, humorous fashion. Dr. Meeker was candid in his assessment of the conference. If there was a consensus, it was that everyone was comfortable admitting what we don't know and that we have research challenges ahead of us.