Readers of my books will know the contrast I make between 'what is' thinking and 'what can be' thinking. Analysis, judgement, recognition and argument, are only one aspect of thinking. For example the parallel thinking of the Six Hats method is spreading very rapidly because it is so much faster and more constructive than argument. The irony is that recognition has been of most value in science which Socrates largely thought a waste of time. In matters such as conflict and dispute resolution the recognition method is worse than useless because it sets up and exacerbates conflicts with the emphasis on judgement - rather than designing a way forward.
Value is to design as truth is to analysis.
There will be suggestions as to how others can contribute.