Miller bleated a rather low form of corporate propaganda and said almost nothing memorable. He argued that there was a lot of hypocrisy in complaining about foreign sweatshops when we have plenty of them right here in the U.S., and migrants workers who live in conditions of near-servitude. But the No side's arguments embodied some of the shortcomings of their position. Cavanagh didn't disclose where we'd get our computers, telephones, and diesel engines from. Aaron pointedly asked Nader how a consumer advocate could recommend the restriction of imports, which could lead to reduced selection and domestic monopoly.
Today is an extremely tough act to follow.
I know I used that word yesterday too, but it really fits. All rights reserved.