Specialty states two grounds for reconsideration.
The first essentially reargues the issues of the alleged defects in the machinery, adding an untimely affidavit in support of Specialty's position. This argument shall be denied for the reasons stated in my Memorandum of March 30, 1999. The second, however, requires further consideration. I did not reach this issue earlier because it appeared that A-R also was claiming direct damages from Specialty, which Specialty concedes could be recoverable. In its motion for reconsideration, Specialty has demonstrated that the only damages it may be subject to are consequential.