In an attempt to find the underlying cause of this paradox, additional research was conducted. Multiple elements were identified as possible limiting factors.
Video arraignment involves many agencies.
In this interdependent environment, coordination and cooperation among participants are essential to success. Statutes limit the proceedings that may be conducted via video. If the technology is to expand, current applications must be evaluated and new applications identified. Judicial resistance to video may be caused by numerous complex legal, procedural, and philosophical reasons which are beyond the scope of this report. Staff resistance may arise due to changes in the work environment.