Some of these changes can be clearly linked to the conference. Most cannot be linked to the conference, but are clearly the result of numerous calls for change that have taken place over the last decade. In particular, colleges are seeking more stakeholder input into their programs, and are trying to forge more links between research and extension activities. There are some significant differences in how research funds are allocated among the Plan for Action goal areas versus how extension allocates funds among these same areas. Some difference is to be expected.
Some areas require a great deal of research effort to address a few important questions.
In other cases, the research information is largely available, but needs to be put in the hands of those using it. It seems likely that research and extension program administrators and faculty should jointly evaluate what is important to both groups, then decide how research and extension resources should be allocated to reach these goals. One possibility is a strategic planning exercise that involves both research and extension, administrators and faculty. Research should not be undertaken without some thought given as to how the results will be delivered. Extension programs should involve research to ensure the best science is delivered.