If the resurrection of Jesus never happened, then Christianity would be a false belief. Well, my good friend and the author of this editorial speaks about evidence in the sense of scientific experiments. S imilarly, even if we are merely discussing the question of God's existence, we are still outside of scientific experimentation. God is not a testable substance that can be manipulated under controlled conditions. Without a doubt, the matter of God's existence will have to be decided in the realm of philosophical thought.
Science does play a role in the debate, but it is only one factor to consider.
Other factors, for example, will be the logical validity of arguments provided, our existential experiences, historical evidence, and philosophical reasoning. I n order to conserve space, I will conclude with one more observation. The scientific materialist rests his entire structure of rationality upon empirical observation and the scientific method. Prima facie, that sounds very plausible. That proposition, in fact, is not a scientific proposition at all, but a statement of philosophy about the scientific enterprise.