Naming strategies are additions to your paper rather than reviewing strategies. You name your paper in the title you give it, which ought to establish both a topic and a position. You name your argument by the use of subheadings at major transitions in the argument. You name the paper by including direct rhetorical questions as paragraph topic sentences or in separate transitional paragraphs. Rhetorical questions explicitly name just what questions you are answering in your paper.
Transitions work best when they underscore movements that already make sense.
Well, I've suggested how parallel structure in the body of your argument can bind its components. But such parallel structure works best when the components of its structure hang together. I can certainly write an idea in parallel form , but that's no guarantee that its parts fit together. Transitions at the sentence level serve multiple purposes. You'll find the list in chapter 28 on page 303.