The clarity of television can be problematic. Without ambiguity, there is no room for questions. However, television need not be an end in and of itself. Zeffirelli's thinking individual can and will ask questions and seek answers. This is where I differ with McLuhan and concur with Jenkins.
Technology can play a role here.
It can lead to the sharing of questions and collaborative effort in seeking answers, social and spiritual constructionism. Not every way works, not every way is right. Professor Pernot suggested there is universality to prayer, a thesis to which I subscribe. Fancy is unconstrained while imagination mixes freedom and constraint. Individuals must choose to apply these models to the problems they face.