The exact manner in which we approach Prague 2002 and how we will make judgments, and again, what standards we will make those judgments with respect to expanding the Alliance will be announced in due course, but I have no particular announcement for you today. I think it is clear that the Alliance has shown that it can take in new members as it did recently, a couple of years ago, and within a short period of time those new members are fully integrated and making contribution to the Alliance. And so the Alliance is open for enlargement, and the pace and the circumstances and the conditions of enlargement will be made know in due course. I must admit I did not go through the lengthy communique looking for the acronym ABM, but I must say that it didn't warrant particular attention this time around. I didn't take a poll around the room of everybody's views, but I think I can safely say that there is recognition that there is a threat out there.
Some people see it as a more immediate than others.
Some people see it as greater than perhaps others. I don't think there is any question that there is some sort of a threat out there. And it would be irresponsible for the United States as a nation with the capability to do something about such a threat, not to do something about such a threat by examining the technologies that might deal with these threats whether these threats are there tomorrow, a year from now, two years from now, or five years from now. If you want to have the systems that can deal with such threats, you don't wait until they are pointed at your heart. You start working on it now.