I don't see any pressure there. We see Sun most of the time, particularly in the dot-com area, because they're the server platform. Storage area networks, the architecture you prefer with numerous servers connecting to a centrally managed island of storage systems, long has been based on Fibre Channel networking technology. When the technology comes, we'll be ready to support it. It's starting now, but it's very early, and these interconnect technologies last a long time.
Some people think storage area networks and network-attached storage are converging.
The larger customers will use both. And at the same time they may have within their organizations engineering departments that use network-attached storage. I see lots of companies running their business entirely on direct-attached. I see some starting to run their business on storage area networks. I see none running their entire business on network-attached.