For campus, rape is translated as sexual misconduct, so the outside world has never been able to reconcile what students say, because outside it is rape, inside traditionally we say sexual misconduct because that's what we deal with. And that's a big problem, not for us, but for everyone. And then a lot of the students also retain the freedom, after what happens at the university, to bring rape charges against someone, and we've seen in the past seven years some situations like this. So that is a big problem, and therefore the problem is big enough to warrant the kind of debate we're having. Why don't you report to the police and the city and the state.
Student has to study, has to encounter the accused, alleged perpetrator.
So we have chosen the term misconduct in order to be able to cope with these issues as an internal matter whereas the external matters always remain. And then the criticism is, that rape is not against the victim alone, rape is also against the whole community, a violation of community, not to mention civil authority, the law of the state and the law of the land. We don't report directly to the police, given that the victim, alleged victim, may not want it, that you still have an obligation to do that. Well, that's a big, big, big, tough question. So these are some of the considerations that I have read in the press, that the critics bring up and some of the students themselves bring up.