I don't quite know where this discussion may lead, but here are some tentative thoughts. If we take Adam at his moment of creation as the instantiation of this, rising from the ground and in isolation not only speaking but speaking like an 18th c. philosophe, we do indeed have a mystery. If this body speaks because it flows from and presupposes social relations, then seeing it in isolation from those relations would be one possible source of the very kind of question that either the behaviorist or the analyst asks. The wider conventional basis of the dominant approaches of . .
Symbols are intentional.