The second fallacy is in psychology. It is telepathy. Angels, if they exist, communicate with one another through nothing physical, such as human speech. Angels communicate with one another telepathically. There are parapsychologists who claim that one man can read the mind of another by telepathy.
Telekinesis is another phenomenon that some parapsychologists describe.
It consists in moving a physical thing without touching it, nor using any physical means to do so. The third fallacy is angelistic linguistics. By using this language, human beings would be able to communicate with one another as angels do, without any chance of misunderstanding. This assertion may hold true of angels who do not suffer from an intrinsic conflict between their lower and higher faculties, between their sensitive appetites and their reason, but it is not true of human beings, who have such faculties. Not being angels, human beings can be incontinent in Aristotle's sense of that term.