But this arrives too late - my friend already did it. This is what he does. A's remark is conceived to be an argument which shows up what is true and what is not. And I may make a remark about not using windows like that. But I may, nevertheless, fail to get his cooperation.
Transgressions are normal too.
And one man's transgression is another's liberation. After all there is, in addition to genuine grammatical alienation, also willfullness, there is also confusion and there are mistakes - and, crucially, the possibility of the acknowledgement of these. That is, our currency is Wittgenstein's distinction betweeen sense and nonsense, so often overlooked. But perhaps the request for such a reasessment is a badly expressed need, for such a reassessment may already require all the resources which such a text sets out to achieve. And to set these challenges knowing full well that it is just to restate the usual questions which philosophy has ever asked itself.