I thought a page like this might help surfers determine whether they are being 'fake-d out' or not. Especially if they are considering purchasing a membership to a site based on promised content that seems a bit far fetched, as some are quite expensive. F ake images or false headlines aren't a problem with me when they are clearly identified rather than used to dupe surfers. They can be fun in the satirical sense like cartoons we see in magazines. Of course, I do have a problem with fakes that intentionally degrade or misrepresent a celebrity.
T here are two methods of using fake images on today's nude celebrity sites.
Another, more difficult method is to modify the clothing on a non-nude shot of a star. This method takes a pretty savvy graphics person to create a believable image and is not seen as often. A side from the actual fake image issue there is the problem of sales pitches designed around content that doesn't exist. Of course, when you enter the site this picture is nowhere to be found or a very poor fake image is delivered. Most nude celebrity content on the web is scanned from magazines, captured from video or in some cases created by a good fake artist.