So reproducible events lend themselves to scientific inquiries. Whereas unpredictable events lend themselves to statistical inquiries. Events that are singular lend themselves to legal inquiries. And the question of whether there was a creation of the world or there is a destiny to man are singular inquiries. These are singular events.
Science has no proper jurisdiction in the question of origin or destiny.
To me, science is useful in helping us see that biblical faith can be reasonable, that it is not reserved for people who are ignorant of the real world and how it works. I have not created this web site to prove the Bible. I do not believe that anyone should ever say that science agrees with religion. What I would say, which I think is a far more powerful statement, and one which allows people to be religious, is to say, the modern observations of science do not disagree with religion. . . . We're merely saying that if science for a while goes into disagreement, we don't lose our faith.