12 Presenters speak clearly and can easily be heard. 13 Overall organisation, consistency, flow and effectiveness of presentation. Significant differences were shown in resources and non-verbal communications. Standard deviations are in parentheses. Significant at .05 level.
Standard deviations are in parentheses.
The literature supports the use of various assessment mechanisms including peer assessment of student presentations. The results of this study also indicate that students find the assessment criteria in use important. The challenge is teach students the value of research into more sources rather than sticking to the recommended text. While the result shows students' agreement with the assessment criteria, caution should be exercised in the interpretation of results. In conclusion similar surveys over a period of time with larger number of students would be a logical extension.