And, don't say that you can't do so or that you don't have to do so and still continue to advance it as the equal of science. Well, I'm afraid I have to say I can't do so, despite the fact it annoys you. It doesn't annoy me. On the contrary, it delights me since it just shows that my argument is by far the stronger of the two. But this is not in opposition to science.
Science has nothing to do with the question under discussion.
God doesn't exist. You keep misstating my premise. Once again, it is that everything in the universe derives from understandable and knowable physical laws and that nothing supernatural is required. My belief in the non-existence of God is a consequence of that premise combined with other arguments. Science shows how nothing supernatural is required to explain anything in the universe.