This kind of reading can be irrational and automatic. In psychological experiments, when we send simultaneously two conflicting messages, most people will make their conclusion based upon the non-verbal message, without being aware of their basis for conclusion. For example, if a debater mutters evidence with a limp body posture, plays nervously with his fingers, and stares at the floor, no matter how strong the evidence is, one might not be convinced, or at least will start wondering what is wrong. The interpretation of messages that are made during a debate is created from a direct result of a processing of communication at all levels. We respond to the dynamic, rhythmic, melodic and agogic components of someone s voice.
Silence is a very powerful message.
Macro and micro facial expressions are strong messages usually connected to feelings, attitudes and personal belief systems. At the same time, our face is also the area under most ego control. This means of expression has enormous persuasive value. The postural aspect of someone s communication relates to the position of the body in a dialoguing context. The whole body is an unit of communication.