Also, cloning in general can protect endangered species from extinction. Their reasoning has been widely substantiated by science. Both the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the American Dietetic Association have endorsed vegetarian diets. Meat is also an extremely low yield product. In the U.S., animals are fed more than 80 percent of the corn grown and more than 95 percent of the oats.
Vegetarianism is also environmentally more sound.
Whether it's water use or pollution, soil use or erosion, resource use or air pollution, raising animals for food is a prime contributor to the problem. The point to all of this information on logical vegetarianism is that farming and killing animals for their meat is not at all necessary and is done despite the existence of a better alternative. Therefore the answer to the question of whether the two are the same is absolutely not. Farming animals for organs is far more justifiable and absolutely necessary. Epilogue All of the arguments that have been presented in favour of cloning have been rather convenient and would be suitable for intellectual debate.