Its dissemination would be very tightly controlled and limited. It would only be seen by a small number of individuals. The task of using interception to fight serious crime and defend the vital interests of the country is not taken lightly. Where it is used, it produces results time after time. The Bill will help ensure that it continues to be just as valuable in the future.
Strong cryptography is a fact of life and anomysation easy to achieve.
The RIP Bill is not about controlling the use of cryptography. As you say, the fact is that strong encryption is freely available. This is the unpalatable reality. The challenge for governments is to find ways of minimising, as far as possible, the extent of this hit. We, and the US Government, recognise that there are no single or simple answers.