While acknowledging the importance of freedom of expression, Butler-Sloss stressed that it was the exceptional nature of this case that led her to impose an unprecedented restriction on expression. Clearly, there are reasons to be concerned about the safety of Thompson and Venables once they leave custody. Yet the Butler-Sloss judgement seems to confuse the impact of words with physical harm itself.
Words do have an impact on actions.
Newspaper headlines at the time of James Bulger's murder described Thompson and Venables as 'evil' and 'cunning'. Comments made by the Bulger family are understandably charged with anger and revenge. Death threats sent by others are being taken seriously as intent to kill the men on their release. As a result, the idea that Thompson and Venables are beyond rehabilitation has been forged in the popular imagination, contrary to the views of medical and care experts. The effects of publicising information about the identities and addresses of Thompson and Venables cannot be underestimated.