Rawson had no idea why the letters were written or for what purpose. In the previous 30 years her competency had never been questioned, in fact, she had received several commendations for her teaching ability and professional approach. In an interview and in several letters to the principal Rawson meticulously answered every allegation. In the past, school administrations would seek to allay any concerns that parents may have. Under TSO140, accused teachers are presumed guilty, regardless of their answers to the charges, before any claims have been substantiated.
Teachers have no democratic rights throughout the process.
The clause forbids them from informing their colleagues of the allegations, thereby precluding a public defence campaign. Again, the teacher is assumed to be guilty. Secondly, an internal inquiry is carried out by an officer chosen by the Department. No transcript of the inquiry is kept and no legal representation is permitted. At any stage in the process, new and unsubstantiated allegations from unknown accusers can be brought forward.