Early on, members were intimidated by the ambitious nature of the task, but later the same group expressed interest in enlarging its task, asking why a code couldn't be developed for faculty and staff, and why the group couldn't consider academic and policy issues in addition to interpersonal or social conduct. At other times the group's cohesion and it's immersion in the task made it unable to articulate concepts that to it seemed perfectly obvious. An account of what characterizes relationships in the campus community . Students bring some things with them. Student learn some things while they're here.
Students learn a lot from each other.
We can influence what they learn. The reports which were returned varied apparently according to the effort of researchers. Yet on the whole, they indicated that student behavior is rarely informed by what commission members perceive to be the aims or aspirations of the institution. A summary of what's expected by the institution. Members of the commission believed they understood what the institution intended to encourage, and assumed everyone more or less agreed on the values that would be promoted through the University experience, but when it came to locating, articulating or translating the agreement, the group realized the importance of, and need for its work.