Ultimately, voting on all attributes, not just on an overall evaluation, might be done by online readers too. Five attributes I invented, namely 1 to 3 and 12 to 13. The two attributes immediately below come first because items that pass them often needn't pass the remaining tests. Likewise if an item doesn't need an official OK or funding, but is personal or social, remaining tests are often moot. Based on intangible factors, such as cleverness, humour, provocativeness, etc.
Some readers are most interested in such striking items.
Alarming to politicians. In fact for the 1994 Awards the judges used a fairly arbitrary rating scheme for judging ideas, with each individual judge filling in a chart as follows. First, out of 100, the judge's intuitive response to the idea. Then, out of 20, how novel and imaginative they thought the idea was. Also out of 20, how much progress the idea had already made or was imminently about to make.