The picture is of an unbearded, powerful figure standing on a mountaintop with its arms raised. I would certainly concede that different decks can and do look at the archetypes from different perspectives, but in this case I feel as if the archetype has been abandoned. This Hermit seems to have taken on characteristics usually assigned to the Magician. The given meaning for the Pope speaks of conventional behavior, while that for Law speaks of what authority dictates and conditioning through upbringing and society. It all sounds the same to me.
Some cards seem to have been given their planet simply because all the others had been used up.
For example, the Star is assigned Mercury, for no particularly cogent reason that I can see. All of this raises an interesting question about to what extent deck authors and artists should impose their own concepts onto readers. Of course, any deck will have its own perspective. It's easier to deal with when the cards don't contain keywords, which is why I've always preferred not to have them. Without keywords a reader is free to add to or change the meanings of the cards, the only restriction being what's contained in the card's image.