The UCI hasn't said the last word, we need to work and wait. Ultimately there is talk that the Congress of the International Olympic Committee, could be a starting point. Yes, it could be the start because this is an organisatoin which influences the majority of sports. I'm sure that a new definition of what doping is will have to come out of there. A house can be completely clean one day, but the next day there is a need to clean it again.
Sports are in a continuous evolution.
If a person takes a cold medicine, nothing happens, but if an athlete does it, he will test positive for ephenedryne. We need to have very clear, that excessive dedication of the athlete always lead to certain dysfunctions which have to be taken care of. But there will have to be some limits. The limit will be dictated by the new definition of doping. If the Olympic Games are making millions of dollars, then the spectacle that is being offered should have the same value.