And duration, in order to arise, requires a persisting present. After all, a thing which exists, but does not persist, exists for a total duration of only one moment. All things which exist necessarily exist for some length of time, however short this may be. This argument applies to the present moment. Clearly, the mystery of time's passage is solved.
Time passes, therefore, for the simple reason that the present exists.
Factual inconsistencies or conflicts can arise between two experiences of reality only if a temporal relationship exists between the two experiences. In order to compare experiences in the mental life of any two consciousnesses, the two must somehow co-exist within a common temporal context. The fact of the matter is that we can organize separate, individual experiences into common contexts, which of course is the purpose and function of language. If this could not be done then language would not work, and all of your speaking above is quite useless from your own logic and point of view. You contradict yourself.