Hence, on each form there is one figure that is not on the partner's form. The function of the blank rectangle is that, if a figure that is referred to is not on the partner's form, the correct response is the number of the row in which there is the blank rectangle. The finding was that intelligibility training exempted approximately 60 percent of remanded students, and interrogation training exempted another 30 to 32 percent. This left a backlog of 8 to 10 of every 100 remanded students who could not be exempted by further training to a higher criterion level in intelligibility and interrogation. Observations from behind the one-way mirror of that 8 to 10 percent in their appearances before Review Boards led to the suspicion that the affects they tended to produce in Board members were not appropriate for that occasion.
Students sit in two concentric circles as in the other two kinds of training.
The criterion for any group of 3 to 6 dyads is a sequence of four successes in a row, where a success is every pair completing 16 items in 3 minutes with each of 4 different partners. The few students who had completed the intelligibility training and the interrogatory training and who were still remanded for additional training then completed the affects training. When they then appeared before Review Boards, all of them managed to be exempted. Then a group of 40 unremanded students who were scheduled to appear before Review Boards were tested with each of 8 different partners. The score earned by each dyad was assigned to each partner, and a student's score was the sum of his score with each of 8 partners.