It seems that this situation will be like that for ever. Both types of consciousness have their advantages, and can be easily in complement of one another. The main difficulty arises when these types of consciousness are not in complement but in confusion, and this confusion is often quite ugly. The confusion of hot and cold can only lead to warm. This warm space of confused consciousness gives a birth to the, so called, alternative models of modernity.
Totalitarianism is a modelled modernisation.
The experience of Russia, and, probably, of Israel, shows that communism is only possible in a form of the military communism. Swedish, Dutch, of course, German and Israeli models of socialism, whether you wish it or not, make you agree that the real socialism is possible only in a form of national-socialism. Meanwhile, hard ideologies based upon the class struggle and race theories are easily substituted by even more subtle mechanisms, which influence social consciousness. Let me repeat that totalitarianism could be also discussed outside any political context. Even when an obvious totalitarian structure is absent, totalitarianism is present wherever mass culture is present.