In Amsterdam, for example, people start screeming and walk away because they get bored immediately. In other countries, the audience remains silence, whatever you try, because it is not common to speak in public and they prefer to express their opinion rather in a much more informal, intimate environment, like the cafe. Other culture might still have to deal with 'machismo', dull academic rituals etc. In the past they used to work in De Balie and Paradiso and organized an endless list of debates, meetings, public discussions, lecture series and conferences. Most conflicts are hidden nowadays.
Victims can only speak within the victim discourse.
Institutional power structures are finding their own way to make deals. And the 'enemies' are hiding until violent clashes and bitter hatred suddenly occur. The rest is dealt with in a boring, rational way, using the well known empty phrases, you can find in the newspaper, day after day. The only well known commentators are cynical journalists, who would like to eliminate the hype as soon as possible. Noam Chomsky and others have no clue about new media and still speak about the New York Times and the networks and the same counts for Neil Postman and other conservative defenders of book culture.