Employer's medical experts included Dr. Emil J. Bardana, Jr., an allergy and immunology specialist, and Dr. David Raskin, a psychiatrist. Dr. Bardana noted Employee's past health problems, as well as the lack of an actual physical reaction between the buildings' allergens and her body's proteins. He said that while carbon dioxide and microorganisms were found in the air filtering system, they did not rise to the level of causing ill health. The Court, which has a limited role in reviewing Board decisions, determines whether the decision is supported by substantial evidence and is free from legal error. Talmo v. New Castle County , Del.
Substantial evidence is reasonably adequate to support a conclusion.
The Court will not reweigh the evidence. Johnson v. Chrysler Corp. , Del. The Claimant has the burden to prove a work-related injury and its extent. Streett v. State , Del. An indispensable prerequisite to recovery in a worker's compensation case is proof of a causal connection between the accident, occurring at work, and the resulting disability.