But another regular poster is mk2k, a.k.a. James Brundage, who landed near the bottom of the list. Apparently, every rule has an exception. My essay from last year concerned whether quality was objective or subjective. Certainly, the concept of 'quality' exists.
Some films are obviously better than others.
The disappointing answer is, probably not. But not very close. The real difference is greater. Let's say it's an average of twelve points. The median difference would be much lower, but the difference would be made greater by a few films where we differ significantly.