The decision taken at the Luxembourg Summit about Turkey is the last chain of a long thinking process. The reality that has come out at the end of the summit is the fact that the member countries have not reached a definite decision about the full membership of Turkey to EU at least in respect of its timing. The Luxembourg Decision, which drew the EU's enlargement borders within a perspective of 20 years, did not oppose to the inclusion of Turkey in the enlargement of EU, but Turkey has not been included to this perspective.'' Pointing out that a full discrimination has been shown towards Turkey at the Luxembourg Summit, the report added that both the internal dynamics in EU and also the problems, which are foreseen to exist in Turkey played in taking that decision. Stressing that the EU will evolve within a perspective of 20 years, the report added that ''the Copenghagen criteria, which are valid for candidate countries are also valid for Turkey. The criteria concerning good neighbourhood relations can not only be fulfilled by Turkey.
Turkey are liable for other criteria.
It is known that the decisions taken at EU summits can not change in a short time. In fact, it is wrong to expect EU to revise its decisions, which are taken at the Luxembourg Summit. Noting that the relations between Turkey and the EU can be improved in short term within the framework of the Association Agreement, the report said that the most important factor which will improve Turkish-EU relations in the medium term is the step which will be taken by EU concerning Turkey's being candidate of Turkey. The report added that Turkey should also fulfil her responsibilities in the medium term. An HRI Project.