Third, ubiquitous cheating is commonly reported in the press. This publicity degrades the public's perception of the university, and may reduce public and private financial support for higher education. Nonetheless, if each student is inclined to cheat, to the detriment of all, who will wield the whip. The responsibility lies mainly with professor. She can take several deterrent steps, including monitoring exams, creating several versions of exams, issuing verbal warnings that cheating will not be tolerated, and punishing detected cheaters.
Students also have responsibilities.
If she does not respond, he can take his complain to the departmental chair and other administrative officials. These proactive measures may help resolve the student's dilemma and are more likely to benefit him and others than the choice of cheating. The questions posed in this case are relevant to any college campus, and the circumstances of the scenario could potentially legitimize cheating for some students. Most students would be at least tempted to cheat in this situation. The advantages of cheating are obvious.