For each criterion, please reflect on your progress and indicate your self-assessment by circling the descriptor in the rubric that most accurately describes the progress you believe you have made. This is to ensure clear communication regarding expectations of what is to be submitted to the TEC for review. Review criteria Draft rubrics for reviewing institutional assessment systems are presented on the following pages. The IPSB Teacher Education Committee invites comments on the draft rubrics and suggestions for those rubrics still to be developed. Self assessment For each of the criteria, please reflect on your progress and indicate your self assessment by circling the descriptor in the rubric that most accurately describes the progress you believe you have made.
System development provides description of stakeholders involvement.
An institution, at its discretion, may wish to consider others, e.g., parents, business community. No Progress Little Progress Progress Exemplary Progress Stakeholders have been identified. Meeting with stakeholders has occurred, tasks and roles have been specified. Activity based on role delineation has occurred. Monitoring and revision of the assessment system continues to involve stakeholders.