If petitioners think Mahala did not adequately examine the landform, they may cross-examine him on this point. 16 - denied. If I recall correctly, all the testifying geologists make some mention of nearby landforms. Petitioners have failed to show that this testimony is irrelevant. 17 - denied.
Testimony regarding the southern edge of the site is potentially relevant.
18 - denied. See first paragraph of this section. 19 - denied. 20 - denied. I take Mahala to be testifying not merely about some personal standard, but rather the Department's approach.