We will reverse and remand. Therefore, it held that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction. However, the legislature has given no indication that these two provisions are connected in any way. Indeed, the opposite can be fairly implied. Thus, it appears that something else was meant by that phrase.
Some states use more than one method.
2A Sutherland Stat. See 2A Sutherland Stat. Each of the enumerated actions involves genital contact, anal contact, or an excretory function. This statement refers to an action which is encompassed by none of those three categories. Appellant's ground for review is sustained.