Consequently they cannot recognize public, nor performative goods. The laws are important because they are ours . . . . The result of this line of thinking is to never accept the necessarily false promise of the reductionist who claims that nothing is lost in accepting the theoretical substitute. Plato promises that what is left behind is merely the gross. Whereas pragmatists claim that all substitutional abstractions must necessarily originate from the original embodied experience.
Theories can never be more than optional views of that experience.
On 98 T. claims that social science theory is disanalogous with physical science theory. This happens doubly. She then demonstrates how Mr. Spok plays 3-D chess. Thus a challenging theory can . Americans should be perfectly familiar with this in the areas of colonialism and cross-cultural sensitivity.