Please explain your complex beliefs in more detail and include sample points of where you agree with evolution and disagree with Creationism. Just because a belief is old is no indication that it is true. Like any other belief, the final judgment as to whether it is true or false must be made based upon the evidence. If there is no evidence to support a given proposition, then it is nearly impossible to support that proposition as being true. There is bound to be contention between any systems which approach issues from opposite directions.
Science reaches conclusions by examining the available evidence.
Religion starts with the conclusions it desires and cares little for whether or not there is any evidence to support them. Ah, here is the sterotypical nonsense that I was talking about. Please support such a claim with specifics instead of blanket derogatory comments. Any attempt to disavow it will require details as to why it is wrong and how it actually supports the Creationist's views. Gould's theory would not have been advanced and would not have received global acceptance if it was not derived from available evidence.