Paul's advice, on the contrary, is to 'eat at home' and avoid idlers, who must either work or go hungry. Either we ought, or we ought not, to maintain some particular diet for religious reasons. Paul's recounting of his travels is insubordinately boastful and rivalrous rather than humble, respectful and obedient toward those who preceded him in the Discipleship. The Gospel attitude toward wrongdoers is merciful, yet Paul's is frankly inquisitional. In any event, even if Christ referred to that custom parabolically as in Th 53 he certainly did not forbid its physical practice.
Various women speak up boldly to the Savior.
Paul emphatically opposes any liberated role for females. Those documents, in their entirety, proclaim a discipleship which is fundamentally incompatible with the message of Christ himself as recorded in the historical Gospels. Furthermore and most remarkably, prior to Clement of Alexandria and Irenaeus of Lyon at the close of the second century, there is no single author who quotes from both the Gospels and from the Epistles. There was thus an exceedingly long period of schism between the traditions of the Twelve and of Paul, prior to the earliest attempts at textual reconciliation. The irony of course is that the Gospels themselves, of which tradition Paul was evidently ignorant, were ultimately only preserved by the Pauline Church, which also disseminated the very OT which Paul himself had disdained.