Nearly every aspect of the definition that the court used for evolution fails the court s test for being scientific. Those few tests it does pass, it passes more by our generosity than by its own merit. If we felt more argumentative, we could probably prove in a court of law that they don t really pass those tests either. If being non-scientific is grounds for not teaching a subject in public schools, then evolution should not be taught, either. Evolution is not scientific.
Science is against evolution.
There was reaction to this essay.