Any mutation that contributes to an organism's differential reproductive success will tend to spread in a deme, thus changing the gene frequency of the original gene and the mutant. Perhaps I've missed your meaning. I'd like to invite people to read my webpage. Here is a theory that someday may defeat Darwinism. The whole issue of revelation becomes irrelevant as long as you are not asked to blindly believe.
Testing is encouraged.
Blind acceptance is not. So what can scientists complain about. If I were a scientist, I would be more than happy to have direction into areas of study rather than asked to flounder through one false start after another. Anything that might produce fewer mistakes, less human error, should be welcomed. APForum Terms of Use This portion of APNet is dedicated to providing you with an opportunity to share your opinions and ideas with other users.