But one observation I have made of Christian apologists is that in general they don't want to be very specific and risk verification or refutation. In fact we run from verification and prediction like chickens in a barnyard run from a hungry dog. The YEC's say that all the data of science is wrong because the scientists have a big bias and are not to be trusted. Thus they don't have to face the facts. Ramm who is somewhat of a centrist goes out of his way to point out that it is unlikely that evidence for his flood will be found.
Verification is avoided.
Those of a more liberal bent, run in another direction. They say that there is nothing to be verified at all. The Scripture doesn't relate verifiable events and so once again verification is successfully avoided. It should also be part of Christian apologetics.