The content may be thin, however, and the argument sometimes difficult to follow. There may be generalities that frustrate the reader. Verb tenses may not agree, sentences are choppy, and often there is repetition. The C paper has lack of effort written all over it, even while it basically completes the assignment. The D paper barely meets the minimum standards for college writing.
Unsupported opinions abound, as do mechanical errors.
Logical progression is lacking and sentences are frequently awkward. Often it is self-contradictory. Despite these failings, however, the paper more or less addresses the required issues.