Generally, MSU-Bozeman faculty are qualified for the positions they hold. There is general agreement with the proposition. Q4 Promotion and tenure procedures are effective in stimulating professional growth of MSU-Bozeman faculty. Disagreement comes primarily from the tenured faculty group. Q5 MSU-Bozeman faculty effectively participate in the academic planning of the institution.
Strongest disagreement comes from department heads and tenured faculty.
Q6 MSU-Bozeman faculty do not effectively participate in the governance of the institution. Q7 Part-time and adjunct faculty contribute positively to the instructional quality of the institution. Q8 Lack of funding for basic instructional purposes is negatively affecting learning in the academic units. This may be perceived as a serious problem. Q9 Support for innovation in instruction is generally available at MSU-Bozeman.