John Shabatura agreed, and noted that the taskforce has discussed the economic justice issue in previous meetings. He notes that the issue goes to what our definition of DP will be, in terms of leveling the playing field. John also noted that MnSCU is not opposed philosophically or on ideological grounds, but would attach cost, look at it as a cost-benefit analysis, as all items for bargaining. Also, that we need to affirmatively declare that domestic partners dependents will be included in coverage. DOER insurance representative Dann Chapman discussed how insurance is purchased and generally when dependents are covered.
State buys employee coverage and dependent coverage.
Discussion that we needed to include definition of dependents included in coverage. Discussion about some of the problems incurred at the U of M with this policy, including what appears to be administrative problems and problems for employees in obtaining coverage.