If we look further into the similarity of how states of mind distort the perspective of the world according to their own peculiar manner, then we can see how I come to view reason as a state of mind with similar attributes of 'emotional' states of mind. Making the world 'fit' into the view that there are rules and connections is an action the mind occupies itself with when 'reasonable'. This is not different from the mind finding foci for anger, that is, in both cases the mind makes things fit the view which it has when in its different states. In essence, any extreme view by itself is similar in its relevancy of extremeness to the 'computer's view' of the world. This observation of how each state has its own view of the world independent of the others leads me to see that, as an example, to be angry is to exclude the view which love or joy would have.
States of mind tend to exclude each other to some extent.
There are more complex states of mind, such as love and joy combined, or anger and grief. These complex states have views that complement each other, like colors that go well with one another. Reason and sorrow are two that come to mind as not commonly associated together due to their different views of the world. If the situation the mind is trying to deal with is one of ordering and analyzing its surroundings, then there is an appropriateness to being reasonable. If sorrow enters the mind suddenly, the mind can become confused with an incomprehensible view.