The framers' genius was to recognize that without protected free speech, any majority could seize control of the public media, silence all dissent and thereby entrench their undisputed power. The framers therefore made freedom of speech the first and foremost of all the Constitution's Amendments. Thus, by design, the First Amendment protects purposely the most dissenting and offensive voices in open debate, since these precisely are the vigilant foes of all attempts at tyranny. It seems obvious that full-scale racial integration will result in exactly the opposite. Thus, by clear definition, a supremacist, whether white or black, is a racist.
Separatists are neither supremacists nor racists.
I happened upon the writings of Emanuel McLittle, a black philosopher, publisher and public speaker who advocates exactly this separatist view of America's future. He opposes, for example, interracial marriage, reasoning that this pattern would ultimately extinguish his own and other races. Advocating neither superiority nor harm to other races, only separateness, he is, by definition, not a racist. White preservationists are no more racist than he. H.RES.35 contains the essence of centralized thought control.