We dismiss the appeal because the trial court failed to divide and distribute husband's employee savings plan, which the court identified as marital property, and, accordingly, there is no final judgment. Husband and wife were married on June 13, 1987. Thus, the judgment never effectively divided the Savings Plan. On appeal wife asserts that the trial court erred in failing to properly divide the Savings Plan. She argues that the court divided the Savings Plan because it identified it and attempted to divide it, but did not do so properly.
Wife contends that the trial court's judgment was final and is thus appealable.
She requests us to enter the judgment the trial court should have entered under Rule 84.14. Husband argues that we have no jurisdiction because there was no full disposition of the marital property and thus no final judgment. It does not. Thus, it divided and distributed the property, albeit erroneously. In this case the court wholly failed to divide the Savings Plan by any percentage or amount so that there was no division or distribution.