I would think public safety was being maintained. But the chairman is not so happy because the objective of the Regulated Health Professions Act was to stamp out sexual abuse by health professionals. How any rational person could conceivably believe that an Act would totally stamp out sexual behaviour in human beings is beyond me. Human beings are sexual, yes they are. There is nothing innately unethical about sex.
Sex is also a complicated human behaviour, highly nuanced.
Not even St. Augustine would have created such an unrealistic, inhuman objective. To achieve such zero risk, and to use zero tolerance for a questionable definition such as sexual touching or contact or inappropriate remarks and behaviours, would require such unethical tactics that an ordinary person would and should be repulsed. Well, of course not. Let me predict that legal protections for the accused will be eroded. Let me predict that more women will be forced into the victim role to get a few advocate women more power and prestige.