Not all conscious experiences are anchors. Memory is not an anchor, and association is not an anchor. These must be introduced as single step expansions of consciousness around established anchors if they are to be a part of the psycho-physical parallelism. Other Anchors Hunger is a believable anchor inasmuch as it has an intrinsic motivational authority. It is a conscious experience that we imagine has a negative effect on the probability amplitude of states of 'creature inaction', at a time when the creature needs to be actively looking for food.
Taste is another possible anchor that provides intrinsic motivation.
It can have either a positive or negative polarity. It is assumed to have a positive influence on the probability amplitude of eating behavior when the organism benefits from the food in question, and a negative influence when the food is harmful. Smell is still another experience that can qualify as an anchor, for it also has definite positive and negative motivating qualities. Perceptions such as sight, sound, and touch are not intrinsically motivating in a positive or negative direction. Unlike taste or smell, there is nothing inherently provocative about, say, 'white light' that would prompt an instinctive yes or no reaction.