I suppose I feel a bit depressed about this, because these are huge spaces, and into these spaces the things which flow most easily will flow. And those of course are the second-rate things. Yes, because a libertarian is someone who thinks that the mere fact that someone desires something is enough to give him a right to pursue it, provided he isn't interfering with other people's rights. And I don't agree with that. I think that, about most things that matter, our desires are fundamentally in need of emendation.
Sex is an obvious example.
I'm a believer in fidelity and marriage and all those things. My life hasn't been exemplary in that respect any more than anyone else's. I do agree there's a huge difficulty in how you control these things, and whether you should control them by law. I think the main thing wrong with the way sex is discussed is what I call Kinseyism. It's regarded as an affair of the sexual organs.