Neither do I, nor I imagine does Andrew. The suggestion that someone's achievement of a A Good Thing precludes thinking about how we might create A Better Thing or even A Different Thing is a bit bizarre. Michael is right that there aren't any descriptive standards to speak of. I've been deploring this for some time. This debate is about what the descriptive rules ought to be.
Some archivists seem to take a perverse pride in doing without comprehending.
But that is another story. I see them as part of a continuing debate on why, where, and how. The idea that one precludes the other, however, is simply ludicrous. And a concept which is never tested in that way is not likely to be well understood or well applied either. If I don't pause on the way to congratulate NLA for its efforts, I'm sorry, but I'm anxious to get on.