No system has any self righteous claim to avoiding such impositions. In a free market, people are free to make their own choices, and unfortunately those choices may constrain the choices of others. Unfortunately people need to cope with bad luck, and with the gamble that reality is. The difference is whether these constraints arrive from a peaceful process of natural evolution, or through forced structures created by people who initiate force and feel justified in using guns to impose their will because they feel their choices need to be obeyed by others. All systems of interaction are based on the use of force.
Tort law is based on the use of force.
I posted a flyer recently talking about the fact that there are different kinds of force. There is a great deal of difference between defending yourself, versus committing murder or robbery, etc. The objection is to the initiation of force, and not its use. The initiation of force includes the non-physical ways of altering the choices of others such as through fraud. A contract isn't considered valid if someone pointed a gun at your head to get you to sign it.