The printed and the virtual versions are complementary, and subscribers get both. Far from the virtual, web-delivered info making redundant the version you can touch and feel, the two formats enhance each other. Reviewing info provided a good practical basis for inquiry into the versions' merits. Each excels in different respects and each could be improved. For my taste, the typography of the hard copy is over-fussy.
Text is cramped and mixes serif and sanserif type.
Perversely, reviews in info do not form part of the searchable corpus on the database. And keyword searching for references can take you out of the bounded database of info and into the whole database of info's host, 'CatchWord'. Postmodernists may value the consolidation of references from info with those from a host of scientific journals, but my mentality is too linear and Gutenbergian. So much for what goats might like in info. Well, they might learn not only how interesting is a goat's life but also how valuable are info's authors' reflections on the extent to which established heuristic and conceptual paradigms retain their power in new, contemporary circumstances.