So much has been written about systems integration that it can be rather a challenge in itself to offer readers a new viewpoint or fresh perspective on the subject. Therefore, in this article I'll attempt to explore integration of design concepts and objectives, rather than the integration of systems and functions. More specifically, I'll review some of the general objectives related to fire protection, security and life safety, and how an integrated design approach can resolve conflicts. It would be no revelation to postulate that an integrated design is the goal of any design team worth its commission. Issues and design elements relating to fire protection, security and life safety are certainly evaluated and discussed in every project.
Some efforts seem to come together in a smoother and more coordinated manner than others.
Of course not. Certainly there are generally applicable objectives shared among programs for many types of facilities and applications. For example, let's say a large pharmaceutical concern is considering developing two research facilities in Boston and Tucson. Even if they share the same objectives, there are obviously a number of differences between the Boston and Tucson locations. Just for starters, there are different building codes adopted and different authorities interpreting those different codes.