Placing selection onto the individual gene, created the situation whereby new genes were required for almost everything, not just a few controlling genes altering a canalized pathway. Gene centric selection was just too slow, because gene centric heritable variation is just too little and gene centric demands for loci substitution, just too high, for gene centrics to form any credible Neo Darwinistic theory. I'd like to invite people to read my webpage. Here is a theory that someday may defeat Darwinism. The whole issue of revelation becomes irrelevant as long as you are not asked to blindly believe.
Testing is encouraged.
Blind acceptance is not. So what can scientists complain about. If I were a scientist, I would be more than happy to have direction into areas of study rather than asked to flounder through one false start after another. Anything that might produce fewer mistakes, less human error, should be welcomed. APForum Terms of Use This portion of APNet is dedicated to providing you with an opportunity to share your opinions and ideas with other users.