Strict liability allows damages to be awarded for any harm caused by a dangerous product. On April 10, a California state trial court ruled that the victims of 1993 San Francisco shooting rampage may seek damages from the manufacturer of the gun which was used in that shooting. While this ruling has only allowed the case to proceed to a fact-finding stage, it could pave the way for victims of similar shootings to sue firearms manufacturers who are in no way responsible for the actions of criminals. But whether the manufacturers of the magazines and ammunition contained in those weapons can be included in the suits will not be decided until this summer. Warren ruled that gun manufacturer Navegar, Inc. may be liable under legal theories of strict liability and negligence.
Strict liability allows damages to be awarded for any harm caused by a dangerous product.
I suppose he chose TEC-9s because these huge pistols are so easily concealed. There is only one little problem here. Someone is a liar. It banned ownership of modern machine guns. Did the police call a semi-auto a machine gun or is Connie Chung and the mayor lying when they said the guns were all legal.