For each country, a local institution has been selected to be responsible for the delivery of continuing legal education. The Bank's projects will involve an intensive training program of the people who will make up the faculty of these local institutions. After they have been trained, the faculty will, in the years to come, deliver participatory training courses to all government lawyers. Projects like these require a major commitment from the governments concerned and this raises the issue of sustainability of such efforts. This brings us to the last portion of this presentation - the issues involved in the Bank's assistance for legal training.
Sustainability is one issue.
Obviously, in designing comprehensive training programs, such as the ones in Viet Nam and Mongolia, an effort has been made to ensure that once the Bank's involvement has ended, the government is able to continue the program. Only time will tell how realistic this expectation is. Again, your views will be most appreciated. This is partly so because in some countries training of judges is covered by programs financed by other, often bilateral, donors. The question arises whether there is a need for the Bank to get more involved in training of judges and, if so, whether in principle training courses for judges should be combined with training courses for other government lawyers or if the training needs of judges are so different from those of other government lawyers that separate training should be given.