The Latin references, although perhaps scanty, are specific, accurate, and relevant. A limited response which lacks full discussion of Vergil's development of the relationship between Dido and Aeneas or which presents a superficial discussion of both elements. The response tends to rely on description, narration, or mere translation. Alternately, the student may write a good essay reflecting knowledge of the poem, but no Latin is cited to support the answer. The student recognizes the passage but presents a vague or weak discussion.
Statements are very general or irrelevant to the question.
The student shows very limited comprehension of the Latin cited, or Latin may not be cited at all. The student understands the question but is unable to write any meaningful discussion derived from the passage. The response may consist of a collection of information which is incoherent or merely restates the question. Although no substantive argument is presented, the response does contain some correct information relevant to the question. The student may demonstrate no understanding of the Latin of the passage or may demonstrate a complete misunderstanding.