I suppose that I should be impressed. I really don't know if you fundy creationists think that this is the first time that we've seen all this creation nonsense before. I have neither the time nor desire to dismember your rather lengthy posts point for point, but will rather demonstrate their overall general absurdity here. Rant, wail and rave all you want, Arthur, but this strawman you've built is of the highest fiber. Your insistence to the opposite matters not one whit the definition of biological evolution.
Science is, of course, based upon definition.
It is not only capricious, but malicious, to redefine something to fit your own prejudices, Art. It's also dishonest. The basis of science. Also, a quality sorely absent from your posts. Secondly, your railing about transitionals.