The writing in this report is difficult to understand. This report has many interesting things in it. The writing is understandable, but there are some places where it may be hard to understand. The writing could probably have been improved if the authors had asked for reviewers to give them more suggestions for improvement. The report is interesting to read and holds the visitor's attention.
Writing is simple, clear, direct, and in an active voice.
Paragraphs are well structured and there is a logical flow from one paragraph to the next, and from one page to the next. There is a variety of supporting information, much of which is useful, adds interest and contributes to an understanding of the project's main idea. Some of the information may not seem to fit or doesn't seem to make any important contribution. There is a rich variety of relevant supporting information that is useful, adds interest and contributes to an understanding of the project's main idea. There is not enough detail and information to support the report's answer to the question.