However, the man was not allowed to teach his views on creation and the Flood. More recently another presbytery licensed an individual who believes Genesis 1 is poetic. I do not know the motive of the individual who used these words. However, the words point to a central issue in this debate. This method is also the best for interpreting Scripture.
Scripture is sufficient to provide interpretation for itself.
Our understanding may be unclear regarding the meaning of Scripture. Scripture itself is clear. Science must be interpreted by Scripture, not vice versa. In a recent mailing from Covenant Seminary, the PCA seminary, an explanation of the Seminary's position on creation was given. Not all of our professors, however, believe that this is the best interpretation.