So if you are willing to risk the accusation of intolerance, then we know your view is sincerely held and morally based and you are not a bigot. Lieberman shies away from telling us. The test for morality is not consensus, or fervor or sincerity, but reason. But making a moral claim, even on behalf of others, does not relieve anyone of the responsibility for explaining its basis. The test for morality is not consensus, or fervor or sincerity, but reason.
People disagree about whether many things are moral or immoral.
The only way to decide which is right is by examining the reasons people offer. But people who cannot or will not tell us what reasons support reservations about or disdain for homosexuality are refusing to engage in rational discussion. There are four counter-arguments we can make. Well, that's just your opinion. Both versions amount to saying that all opinions are equal so the anti-gay view has no more validity than any other.