He indicated that the regressive option was dropped, because it was the least likely to be acceptable. He discussed the advantages and disadvantages of the progressive and flat options. He described the proposed calculation of API, noting the effect of the progressive versus flat weighting for differently situated districts. He indicated that progressive weighting was more consistent with Committee's objectives, although the flat weighting would be somewhat easier to understand. There appeared to be consensus on the progressive weighting recommendation.
Progressive weighting addresses a number of issues.
High performing schools will continue to perform well. The issue is how to encourage low performing schools to improve. Should mention what other states have done in the write up. He explained the effects of each as illustrated by simulations. Eventually, there was general consensus.