We have to try to reconcile the LFW with what Wittgenstein wrote on related topics as well as to other philosophers who write in the same tradition. The following remarks are not intended to give a decisive interpretation of the LFW , but rather as an effort to extract some interesting thoughts. Both estimated dates of the LFW fall clearly in the period of Wittgenstein's post-Tractatus philosophy. Die Welt ist alles, was der Fall ist. Each of these facts is expressed by a proposition.
Most words are names for objects in the world.
Each name stands in logical relations to others, and these relations define the possible constellations of the world. For a proposition to be true the objects must exist and the relations mentioned in the proposition must obtain in the world. Truth is a matter of an isomorphic relation between relations in language and relations in the world. Yet when Wittgenstein came back to Cambridge in 1929, he completely abandoned the atomistic conception and became its most eager and successful opponent. For the early Wittgenstein ordinary language was confused and had to be analyzed via the logical structure of the world describable in an ideal language.