I know of no such facts. Simple commonsense would suggest many ways that the ground could be wet without rain. And Galileo's telescope wasn't lying to him about the surface of those celestial bodies, even if he may have gotten the wrong idea about their motion. Better telescopes, spacecraft television. The limit of scientific knowledge is obvious it is what our eyes tell us.
True science is limited to observation of the present, real, natural world.
Now speaking of falsification, I am firmly convinced that physical experiments most definitely can disprove a proposition scientifically that is, as far as the natural world is concerned. It operates just like the law of gravity that we experience in our everyday world, and it has been universally confirmed by observation whenever and wherever it has been tested. It is a dependable statement of how the natural world really operates. Now evolution claims to be flowing uphill, all by itself in the present, natural real world. The two statements are plainly contrary and irreconcilable.