Low Quality, Low Potential Teaching Effectiveness, and High Ease of Use. Bad curriculum but easy for a new users to get accustomed to using instructional technology. Medium Quality, Low Potential Teaching Effectiveness, and High Ease of Use. Consequently, no stars attached to the learning material could mean that the material was rated poorly by the peer review team or the materials were not yet reviewed. Users could not distinguish between these two possibilities if there are no User Comments.
People contribute material to the collection because they see some value in the material.
For an open resource to work, it must enable participation and provide value to the participants. It needs to be recognized that there is a diversity of standards related to quality and this diversity is supported by the principle of academic freedom. The End Products should be ready for immediate and effective use. Developing Products are at an early or intermediate stage of development and will by definition have problems. Both End Products and Developing Products provide ideas and guidelines for developers and users of instructional technology.