I hate to say it, but the details are unknown to me. To answer this question fully I'd have to be well familiar with all the missions, and I'm not. Extend these kinds of influences to the other missions. It takes so long to develop science instruments that I really doubt the instruments themselves will be redesigned based on incoming data, but their usage and targets will probably be refined. That's a fantastic question and it goes to the heart of efficiency in aerospace engineering.
Spacecraft are incredibly complex, and space exploration missions are replete with details and data.
To capture lessons learned is very difficult. We could spend years just meeting and talking and learning from each other, but there just isn't time for that. Over time, new ways to capture rationale and lessons learned will creep into teleconferencing tools and through other means, but right now it's mostly captured in the memories of high-level program managers who discuss such issues with each other. At reviews and strategy meetings those memories get communicated to the other participants. The other issue is that many times a lesson learned is specific to one spacecraft design and mission and isn't applicable to others.