Yes, I think I was using neutral terms.
Many people have strong views already about whether China is fully capitalist.
The Chinese Party appears determined to try to keep some control of the state and the economy and would no doubt continue to argue that its acceptance of greater economic flexibility is in the ultimate interests of socialism. They argue with more conviction that it is in the ultimate interests of China. What I was referring to in neutral terms was the likelihood of an enormous increase in the technological means of production of agricultural goods in China, the expansion of the market and the release of labour power. This will have enormous geopolitical significance for a multi-polar economic world. Many will see this as increased exploitation of the land and the labour force.