There needs to be a better understanding between consumer and producer. The consumer is entitled to environmentally acceptable methods of production, but he has to show commitment by purchasing a product so produced. Unfortunately this simply does not happen. As consumers we cannot go on asking the impossible, compromising the countryside use and expect no change in land use. The same applies to a view, a place to picnic, to paddle in streams, and so on.
Many land managers provide access free, but beyond a certain level it represents a cost and a risk.
I await with interest to see how the responsibilities on users will be imposed under a statutory right of open access. I think that enforcing it will be a difficult task. It is that which would worry me rather than the principle of open access. On urban fringes, there are impediments to husbandry because of levels of access. I refer in particular to dogs, vandalism, and so on.