The anticircs won and the recommendation is against circumcision. In return the procircs get to dictate most terms of their own defeat. So they open the conclusions with mentioning their strongest research. Its claims are highly controversial in the group, so the compromise is to mention it 'as is', neither really buying in to it nor mentioning its weaknesses. This is what I mean by 'choose not to dispute'.
Most complications are minor, but occasionally serious complications occur.
There is a need for good epidemiological data on the incidence of the surgical complications of circumcision, of the later complications of circumcision and of problems associated with lack of circumcision. Evaluation of alternative methods of preventing UTI in infancy is required. It is left as an exercise for the reader to put one and one together and figure out that given since girls are far more likely to get UTIs circumcision is a ludicrous answer to the latter question. In return they are allowed to point out it answers an fairly irrelevant question. More information on the effect of simple hygienic interventions is needed.