By giving equal recognition to two positions and by not attempting to reconcile the different views into a unified statement, the policy document relativizes biblical truth. Citing verses is of absolutely no help in deciding moral issues, including abortion, unless the verses teach a consistent, coherent position. For example, nowhere are we told that any abortions are sinful. Failure to condemn any abortion stems directly from the report's attempt to recognize all points of view as having biblical support. We must reaffirm a unified truth revealed in the Bible.
Scripture clearly teaches both the sanctity of life and the value of decision making.
However, both positions cannot be true at the same time and in the same relation. If that were possible, two people could come to opposite conclusions about identical problem pregnancies. All choices would become morally ambiguous. In simplest terms, Scripture passages should not contradict each other. Abraham Lincoln faced the same issue of divided versus undivided ultimacy in the struggle over slavery in the Civil War.