II.Whether the trial court erred by apportioning Father an excessive percentage of the child's uninsured medical expenses without entering findings. The facts most favorable to the judgment are as follows. That neither party has shown a justification for a deviation from the child support guidelines recommended support amount. That the parties share any uninsured medical . . .
Mother acknowledges a deviation but claims it is de minimis.
When an award of child support deviates from the presumptive amount provided by the Indiana Child Support Guidelines, the trial court must make a finding that the guideline amount is unjust and state a factual basis for the deviation. After examining the record, we cannot say whether the trial court deviated from the presumptive amount as no findings were made as to the credit either party should receive for the support of their respective prior-born minor children. We cannot make the factual determination of the appropriate credit and cannot determine the presumptive award without such a finding. Therefore, we remand to the trial court for a finding on the credit both parties should receive for support of respective prior-born minor children and, if necessary, a statement of the factual basis for its deviation from the presumptive amount. Next, Father argues that the trial court placed an excessive share of the minor child's extraordinary uninsured medical expenses on Father without stating a factual basis for the deviation.