For example that there are minds and bodies. But such a notion belies completely the actual nature, origin, and operation of basic axioms. Yet it is obvious that axioms of all types and levels are thoroughly ensconsed in the experiential world of culture and history. Since the continued existence and objectivity of cultural institutions are based on the embodiment in letters and symbols we can observe the analogy between them and religious absolutes. Such simple adaptations are plain.
Persons merely enlarge and expand the capacities of societal leaders and fabulators.
Granting that scientific axioms are not simply the starting points for local system making, as in the case of a particular intellectual situation, for example Euclid's axioms for geometry, but rather general orientational attitudes guiding the hypotheses, investigations and interpretations of research. Then it follows that axioms may be either valid and helpful or invalid and hurtful. Despite the fact that the obvious data of psychology consists of fields in which organisms interbehave with stimulus objects the standard and universal assumption has it that objects in cognized situations are created by a brain or a mind residing in or on the brain. Again, although the brain and the entire nervous system are known only to conduct impulses serving as functions to coordinate and integrate complex organisms they are loaded with centers and homoncular powers. The brain is assumed to think, reason, fear, enjoy, and govern.