Commissioner denied the motion as to termination of the maintenance obligation but sustained the motion as it pertained to the termination of the life insurance obligation. Wife filed a timely request for findings of facts. Commissioner further found husband no longer had an obligation to maintain the life insurance as specified in the parties' separation agreement. Commissioner found husband's personal income had decreased. The evidence does not address the existence or non-existence of such a trust.
Wife raises four points on appeal.
Our disposition of wife's second and third points on appeal render her first point moot. Therefore we decline to address it. In her second point on appeal, wife alleges the trial court erred in granting husband's motion to modify with regard to terminating wife's maintenance in that the findings under same were not supported by competent and substantial evidence. In a court-tried case, we must affirm the judgment unless no substantial evidence supports it, unless it is against the weight of the evidence, or unless it erroneously declares or applies the law. Movant bears the burden of proving substantial change.