The only national goal specifically identified is increasing our national economic competitiveness, particularly through references to industrial participation and pursuing critical technologies. The report includes threats to shift funds to other agencies if NSF does not respond positively, and it selectively uses or misuses the findings of other reports to support its own conclusions. This is almost the opposite of Mikulski's thrust. Mikulski's report language was written to close any loopholes through which the agency might wriggle. However, in the face of strong negative reaction, the Senator has softened her position.
Science is fundamentally about pursuing new ideas and new ways of thinking.
Some may be encouraged by Mikulski's FY 1995 actions and the recent election to believe that the 1994 language is passe', and that the status quo ante prevails. I do not believe this is the case because both the Clinton Administration and many members of Congress basically agree with Mikulski's original position. A review of the position of the White House and statements of other Members of Congress illustrates the agreement. The White House view. Supporting Congressional views.