Dolls and books do not. In 1990, copyright was extended to cover architectural works when the U.S. joined the Berne Convention. However, why buildings receive protection denied to other works that do not have appearance as their sole utility is far from clear to me. Continue That's not a condition. Continue While the statute should be more explicit, that's not a condition.
Trademarks have nothing to do with it.
Continue Publication is unnecessary for an enforceable copyright. Perhaps you misread the question. Continue Access is generally the best answer. I hope you picked that. If not, I hope that you know that independent origin is a defense.