I think I can tell. Most cases of apparent disagreement in the inspired writing have been explained, and we may be sure that all could be explained if we had fuller information. Yes, some cases of apparent conflict with history or science have been explained quite recently that were tong hard to understand. The doctrine which we hold is that commonly styled Plenary Inspiration, or Full inspiration. Conservatives hold that the writers were preserved from all error by the enbreathed Spirit guiding them.
Radicals reject such a theory with scorn.
Some liberals believe in a sort of inspiration which heightened the spiritual perceptions of the Scriptural writers, but did not preserve them from error. A dull knife can be an infallible knife if you use it to cut butter. You will weaken the statement by putting in that word. I know it's your pet word, and it's the pet word of a lot of people, but it isn't as strong as the words 'without any mixture of error. Used by permission of the Indiana Baptist.