Well, there are still many companies that still have this to face. The reasoning isn t unrealistic. This distinction is crucial. By leaving the existing software in place, these companies put their energy on the applications, correcting systems software only were mandatory to survive. Okay, so maybe it s unimportant why your company never upgraded until now, but it s important to visit this question because the delay was expensive.
Periodic upgrades are generally small and easy to manage with no downtime.
Also, periodic upgrades let a company benefit from new opportunities. By avoiding all of those upgrades, your company bit the bullet by losing all those benefits and doing a costly and time-consuming approach to remediating applications. IBM used to refer to such a group as a Development Center. If your company lacks such an intermediary for the applications programmer, I propose it be considered. Performance improved immediately and other application teams began to prepare and conduct the upgrade.