Simply, how does the writer perceive the sports bettor who is out there with open arms, waiting, salivating, hoping for something hew for the upcoming sports season. Whether football, basketball, baseball, or even hockey, each represents a need to be filled. Each year, there are dozens of books covering computerized betting angles published on these two sports. When the book compiler is correct, he toots his horn or snaps his suspenders. Many angles hit 70 percent or better for a sustained period of time, then collapse.
Teams change rosters, coaches, lose momentum.
It's really not enough to show the trends. What helps, and what the player wants, is more rationale, more logical reasons for events to repeat or be consistent. For example, certain players are older or the offensive lineman's legs are tired, thus, they perform poorly on artificial turf in particular, expecially in wet weather. It's no lock, but it's worth pondering. Sure, it's stretching the point to presuppose these chosen angles will hold up more than a year or two.