The Philadelphia Experiment is a case in point. Another possibility is that astrology might inspire a new view of science. Here I would depend most on arcs, both primary and secondary, because they provide evidence of other time rates. To call these time dimensions would be a mistake, since the time we do accept is not a dimension in the sense that space is a dimension. Since I've already dwelt on the importance of these other times as they contribute to our lives, I will not do so here.
Time is that which makes possible the phenomenal, the world of becoming.
It makes history, it makes evolution. For time is not objective, which implies that the conceptual mind cannot cope with it. This in turn brings out that experience, which occurs in time and therefore depends on time, is a different way of knowing than intellect or conceptualization, which depends on space. I might add that I did not know of the Timaeus until after I'd so described the four levels of process. The dimensions of space display relations in simultaneity.