However, from some knowledge of the composition and structural differences, I certainly think there will be some differences. They form the important group of timbers. Hence, logging is much more intensive here. Removal of 40 to 100 m3 is normal here. Moreover, the trees are in clumps, and the harvesting can be heavy locally.
Selective harvesting can result in total flattening of the area.
In South America, there no such dominant timber families, and the timber species are spread out thinly. Because of their low density, mainly rivers are used as the main extraction route. This keeps the cost down, and extraction of 8-10 m3 of timber per hectare is still viable economically. Therefore, the damage to the stands is very much less. In summary, logging damage in Southeast Asia would be higher, and the impacts follow.