Few people would disagree. But a law requiring that every parent provide these has no chance of achieving its objective. Noble as the goal may be, such legislation would not be advocated by libertarians both because of its inherent impotence and because the mischief that would be caused in the attempt would give George Orwell nightmares. When it comes to lawmaking, moral justification is necessary, but not sufficient. This ought to be self-evident to any libertarian, especially one who is a professional economist.
Prohibition always has unintended consequences.
The unintended consequence of prohibiting legal abortions is to actually increase numbers of abortions over time. This is because man's laws cannot overrule the natural law of supply and demand, and as long as there is a demand, somebody will provide a supply at an agreed upon price. Unfortunately, if legal abortion are prohibited, many of those willing to supply them would have no more medical training than I do. And they need not worry about liability, because all would take place in the underground economy. As evidenced by the three articles on abortion in the March edition of LP News, we appear to have a lot of people in the party who don't get it.