We have failed to discern in your teachings concerning the nature of Christ, any of the ideas attributed to you. We have never understood you to teach that the substance of the body of Christ was a 'mixture of human and divine substance,' although you do hold that the operation of the Spirit of God, in and through the 'body prepared,' was according to the Scriptures from the beginning of its formation. The Spirit preserved the manna from decomposing, yet it was manna in substance still-suitable for food to sustain natural life. The Spirit of Deity being subject to the will of Deity, would perform no more and no less than He purposed it to accomplish.
Plants grow from seed or roots embedded in the earth.
Yet, if not subject to the subtle, penetrating, vivifying influence of the sun's rays, they would never come to maturity. Naturalists know well how to estimate the electrical power and life-giving agency of the sun's rays, without which no vegetation would mature, and nature would remain shrouded in eternal winter. And still they do not contend that the plants or the seed have incorporated a particle of the substance of the sun, but simply the electrical influence of its rays. One of your critics makes the extraordinary assertion that the 'seed of woman' cannot be understood to mean the seed of woman physiologically. With this beautiful figure, we associate the idea of parent earth and Spirit sun in combination.