When money disappears as a means of anonymous social control, this control will reappear in the form of personal, direct supervision, interference, constraint. In fact, any form of solidarity or help can also be considered as a form of social constraint. Every bolo will have to deal with the inevitable dialectics of constraint and help in a different way. Personal social control is the 'price' we pay for the abolition of money. Almost nobody will be able to isolate him or herself and to disappear in the anonymous interstices of a mass society like the present, except in those bolos based on conscious anonymity.
Society always means police, politics, repression, intimidation, opportunism, hypo-crisy.
For many of us, society will never be supportable and a 'good society' is the name of our nightmare. Not everybody can live in society. The bolos are not primarily ecological survival systems, for if you only want to survive it's hardly worth it. As for the knowledge of such limits, ecological and alternativist materials can be quite helpful, but they should never serve to determine the content of the different life-styles. For this same reason, nima cannot be defined by bolo'bolo, it can only be lived practically.