He said they had talked about their own roles in the Senate and their perceptions of the Senate. Ellis felt it would be good for CAA to take a more proactive stance in reviewing their own role in faculty governance and how their policies and procedures guard against conflict of interests, both real and perceived. Perhaps they could develop a statement of their beliefs. Council members discussed the difficulties associated with reviewing a governing body. There is the possible conflict of interest among members of the group involved in the debate and process, and who should be involved in the process.
Perceived conflicts are sometimes more of an issue than real conflicts.
How in their own membership at any one time over half of the colleges are represented. The compounding of everything when ideas for the future are presented. The ethics of the group. Smith said it had passed the Regents Advisory Committee on Graduate Study in November and then had gone into subcommittee for the Board of Regents in December. A graduate minor in Radiation Safety from the College of Engineering.