129.252.155.79 Comments I have to disagree with Steve completely.
Shared governance is utterly ridiculous.
Faculty's authority should end at the classroom's door. Only a strong presidency accountable to the Board makes sense. Moreover, that president should have some management training and experience and not just a person who has risen through the academic ranks. The only exception may be MBA's. Talking about curriculum and faculty development is important, but ideas without a vehicle to deliver them are only ideas.