The probable contents of the final report began to emerge with a release of a fifth draft version in late October. Promote economic and social sustainability by providing for a wide variety of uses, values, products, and services and by enhancing society's capability to make sustainable choices. Develop planning that is both visionary and pragmatic in order to guide decision-making. The whole notion of collaborative planning is one example. We want to suggest a planning process that involves outside collaborators in the early stages so they're not merely reacting.
People like to take responsibility for constructing solutions.
Johnson and other committee members also cite as a strength of the report its call for a scientifically credible foundation for national forest planning. No matter the content of the final report, there are those who question the process and where it will lead. According to Johnson and other committee members, even some members of the committee may offer dissenting opinions. Dissenters are apparently uncomfortable with what they perceive as the report's primary focus on ecological sustainability over social or economic aspects. There are also those who question how the report will be used after its release.