The affirmative should do the same thing. Look for definitions that clearly include the kind of action taken by the plan. Failing that, look for the broadest possible definitions. Most people believe the function of topicality is to provide a reasonable limit on the number of cases the affirmative can run. If you can find evidence that talks about your policy and the words of the resolution in the same sentence or paragraph, you can read that evidence against topicality violations to make your case sound reasonable.
Topicality focuses on what the PLAN does.
The fact that your advantages talk about the same things as the resolution is largely irrelevant. Make sure your PLAN is topical. Prepare your topicality answers ahead of time. Anticipate the kinds of topicality arguments the negative is likely to run against you and write out answers and counter-definitions before the tournament. The negative will read a definition of one of the words in the resolution that makes your plan sound non-topical.