And that is what substantiated the uniqueness of an enunciation in concern with the unconscious coalescing the dimension of sense to jouissance . Thus Lacan is able to posit a critique of Freud's Odipus by disassembling its manlike dream structure ruled by the master discourse. He then introduces division and the objet a to convey, from the feminine side, the key to the onset of the analyst social invention. Utterance, no matter its contents, enjoys a secular perfection called desire.
Pleasure is now, in the present tense.
Jacques Lacan names this tense persistently. I deem unsuitable, apropos Lacan. He needs no make up. And this is how I find appealing enough to bring before my fellow members the idea of thinking Lacan, on the occasion of the X 0 . Anniversary of his passing away, from a different angle.