Second, it sets out the conditions an employee must meet to receive the severance package. Under the terms of the offer, plaintiff was entitled to receive the entire severance package or nothing. She was not entitled to receive one part of the package but not another. Plaintiff acknowledged that understanding in her deposition. The unambiguous terms of defendant's offer are inconsistent with the assumption that underlies plaintiff's first argument.
Plaintiff advances a second argument.
It follows, she concludes, that the offer contained an ambiguity that made summary judgment inappropriate. Plaintiff's second argument is also at odds with the terms of defendant's offer. Defendant's offer specifies the two conditions an employee must meet in order to receive the severance package. A sixty-day written notice will be issued prior to any job termination. The terms of the offer imply that what ends on the termination date is the worker's employment, not simply the position.