Beautiful to your ears, but not to all. Now here's the argument that simply doesn't hold water. One big problem is with exclusive institutions. I have no problem excluding horses, trees, and bacteria. When language is manipulated for oppression, then we all have a problem.
Some conservative writers see an attack on the priesthood in inclusive language.
Conservatives see an attack on the priesthood by religious goods catalogues selling gray clergy shirts. We're hardly foaming at the mouth. We want accurate translations of what's there, not made-up fantasy about a male God. Most of the debate has been reasoned and polite. To judge a whole movement by a radical fringe would be cutting out some good movements in church history, including us Catholics.