Real innovation is in the cross fertilization of tools and ideas, in a free atmosphere. So there remains a wonderful possibility of transliterating Z usage for diverse user bases. Over specialization may kill any CAD in the long run. One of Z's great strengths is adaptability. Recognizing differing user terminologies will make Z more readily useful to new markets.
New markets means more Z prosperity.
I wouldn't demand instant manual changes. But a growing network of diverse user terminology might be very profitable for all.