In an effort to lump all such views together, scientists argue that, say, Newton's laws belong to a specific reference frame. And of course, scientists insist on defining the borders of that framework themselves, changing the goalposts when it suits them. Poets use techniques such as tautologies. But poets will admit that these are rhetorical techniques. The arrogance of scientists is that they claim exclusive insight in the Truth.
Scientists like to declare to have found evidence of their 'wisdom'.
At closer look, all their 'evidence' is nothing but a boxful of tautologies and other tricks. Newton claimed his rules to be universally valid. This claim ran into problems. So, science tries to put each set of rules into a separate framework, as if quantum mechanics is about the microcosmos and relativity is about things of cosmic dimensions, while Newton remains perfectly valid in between. But of course, relativity, quantum mechanics and chaos theory do not merely apply to the teeny weeny stuff or the really big stuff, but also to all the stuff in between.