I sure wish I'd kept it. It is absolutely laughable and ludicrous to think that WindowsNT version 3.1, the original release version, would be anywhere near Unix in its capabilities. To add even more hype and bluster, Microsoft released NT at version 3.1, not 1.0. In studying this issue, I get the feeling that Apple has to take this release of MacOS X Server very slowly and methodically. 4.4 Unix, the Mach 3.0 kernel, and the file system have been around for awhile, Apple is adding lots and lots of new code.
New code means bugs.
GUI admin tools have to be ironclad. It must be made Posix compliant. The file system has to seamlessly and accurately interleave the old MacOS's Bluebox with the a secure Unix system. We can't have teenage Unix hackers in Germany busting into every copy of MacOS X Server shipped. When the system is finally released, there will be a boatload of Unix cognoscente out there evaluating it, so it better be damn solid.