In order for me to outline what it was that makes, or does not make me a purely private person I had to define what it was that I meant when I said purely private individual. Obviously, that is not what I am, and if taken that way the question is inane. On the other hand, if the question is referring to the conflict that presents itself in the communication of subjective experience, well, then yes, I am purely private, but there is a disclaimer. Phrased in such a way the question would seem to indicate that it is I who is withholding the information, refusing to communicate it.
Privacy is a matter of choice.
Basically, the question struck me as one that when really examined, offered little of use. What I find is that I can't communicate only that which I can't understand. This conclusion can only be reached with very specific definitions which the question, in and of itself, did not provide. I have no idea what you're talking about. You seem to be asserting that in order to understand something I have to communicate it.