Furthermore, the state even regulates the philosopher kings' personal relationships. His way of accomplishing this was for the state to determine who would procreate with whom, to take children away from the parents at birth and to have the community raise the children collectively. Of course, it is highly unlikely that Wiesel would support this type of genetic engineering. Furthermore, the notion of imposition implies stifling alternate views. To do so would be an act of disregard for other individuals' rights.
Nobody has a monopoly on the truth.
Perfection is unattainable. And those designs which seek to provide perfection are actually a threat to the open society. Soros' statement brings us back to Berlin's idea that one group cannot impose its views on others. There is a fundamental contradiction between respect and infringement. There is no one solution.