It is with this legal perspective that the ownership of property has to be considered. Crimes committed also may vary. But, in a military crime a who soldiers burns down the house of a peasant because he had an order from his commander cannot be set free. There is no precedence to this anywhere. HitlerUs soldiers were not set free because they had orders from their generals.
Military crime is a military crime.
If we were to go legally, there is justification for reviewing each individual soldier's case. However, this does not create an atmosphere of reconciliation that is needed. The property of the displaced also has to be considered from this perspective. We cannot see it in isolation of this.