The readers of DSL Prime are more interesting than the editor, so we welcome your comments. I note with interest your comment on the e-mails from DSLF Dublin. I don't think they do justice to what transpired.
Question is does the meat of the proposal deliver.
So some of this is not really compromisable issues and at the same time much of the areas that need specifying do not hinge on the contentious parts of the proposal. That would be a useful compromise. We could also use something that worked for non-ATM DSLs so service providers wholesaling services in multiple LATAs could homogenize their service management, that would be a good compromise too. So I agree that DSL needs to fast track some work, so it is good that they have announced additional interim meetings on the subject between now and the DSLF Portland meeting. Let's hope some significant progress is made and the contentious areas resolved.