And that's just for starters. Abstracted from the fact that Clinton is the president and his law-breaking legendary, it is difficult to make out a clear legal standard for disbarment.
Precedents are all over the map.
The problem is, lawyers hate to discipline themselves. But they would also prefer if those outside the practice remain under the illusion that lawyers are subject to rigorous ethical standards. If ever there were a case for disbarment, Clinton's is it. If perjuring oneself before a federal judge, suborning the perjury of others, and otherwise obstructing justice is not enough, then nothing can ever warrant disbarment. Though you wouldn't know it from watching TV lawyers, lawyers as a group tended to be more appalled than any other professional subset by the president's lawbreaking.