The capacity to apply a theory of anothers mind to someone is a labor process that reflects how group cohesion is built up. This cohesion is normally experienced in every day life as related to how close we feel to people. This structure of the space people occupy with respect to one another is a critical architectural component of human social cohesion in the sense that theory of anothers mind arose from proximate relationships. Social groups will have intensely felt theories of another groups mind. What is possible to look more closely at is the factor of how feelings contribute to that, and especially where disability gives us insight into the larger sense of the whole of social groups.
Proximity is very clear in terms of the social cohesion of homosexual partnership.
In other words returning to the concept of dogmatism, proximity is not what makes dogmatism what it is. We can certainly see how social cohesion arose out of a need for human feelings to cohere people together in a group. That is that the one and only one way I can form sexual relationships is with other men. Or substitute heterosexual. But these artificial structures arise as Jim points out at a particular point in modern economies over past systems.