The ethical system which flows out of pantheism and new age thinking is similar to both emotivism and hedonism, and is really more humanistic than theistic. But the focus is still upon man, and the world becomes god. In summary, there are two reasons why man, acting autonomously, cannot establish a valid and satisfying moral theory on either naturalistic or humanistic moral theory. The scientific method is limited. Science can collect facts, but these pieces of information cannot tell us what we ought to do.
Relativism is always self-contradictory.
Although relativism disclaims the existence of absolutes, it must assume the existence of an absolute by which other theories can be judged. The problem today is that society has abandoned belief in a transcendent, absolute truth, a morally binding source of authority that is above our rights as individuals. It assumes there are no intrinsic values, yet it must assume that intrinsic values exist whenever it gives guidance in making moral decisions. If ends and means are relative, regardless of the ethical system preferred, one s own point of reference must also be in flux. The absolute standard for morality is God Himself, and every moral action must be judged in the light of His nature.