But this rebellion is not simply against censorship, it is a catalyst, a tool, for a whole range of discussion. Censorship and the rebellion against it act as a forum for discussion. It limits the number and types of outlets, which also blockades creativity. My primary concern is for trends toward the acceptance of the loss of freedom, while you fear the same acceptance of loss caused by token freedoms. Yes, but let's also look at the glut of freedom that already exists.
Radical ideas run the risk of being ignored or snickered out of existence.
The freedom we already possess allows the glut of metaphysical crap and mindless fetishism to find its way into the mainstream society without inspiring an ounce psychological revisioning. Truly interesting ideas become buried. They become guilty by association, but they are not put on trial where their tenets can be lauded to the amazement of the frenzied masses, they are simply ignored. But that's not to say that you don't support measures for freedom. Exactly, ultimately I support freedom of creativity, but, as a revolutionary tool, I support the battle itself to be used as a forum.