12.31.00 Several actions taken by the Court over the holidays. Plaintiff's Motion to Consolidate denied because University Counsel is a named defendant, and it would be a hardship on the University to have counsel disqualified. On the new case filed just before Christmas, Judge Hale recused himself on his own motion. Case 2123 was reassigned to Judge Sandstead, Division 3. A Loser's Brief.
University submits their reply brief, but fail to dispute key facts.
No wonder the University didn't send a copy until four days after filing it. The Rule 106 Cause of Action is now at issue and can be ruled on by the District Court at any time. Other Updates Court of Appeals Notice of Filing Suppl Record 12.19.00 Student Files Another Case Against the University. In what is now the fifth case against the University, the Complaint alleges eight causes of action. Judicial Review of the University's unlawful decision in the second proceeding.