Most debates I have seen involve the neg winning a link in one way or another to the aff, but that alone is usually not enough. What you need to win is that the kritik alone is better and that there is some benefit for me to vote for it like the affirmative will claim they have advantages to voting for the plan. So please spend time in the block and 2nr explaining the implications of the argument. Again I ll vote for them. Your more likely to win if you trap the aff into some form of in round abuse and can demonstrate it.
Potential abuse can sometimes be a voter but it has to be very compelling.
And like counterplan theory I like more of an explanation than T is a voter for education. As for everything else I m open to it. Please do what you want and what you are comfortable with running. I m easy to adapt to. If you have questions ask me.