And, finally, scientists have not found it necessary to translate their findings so that the public can readily understand the implications. Research about pesticide safety, for example, has been unconditionally rejected by much of the public. Information technology must also share some of the blame for our situation. It is easier to do research on the Internet than at the library, but this medium seldom allows us to verify the authenticity or reliability of what we read. As our entire society becomes more educated, we become dangerously misinformed on a growing number of subjects.
Wildfires are one example, but the real threat is more likely related to human health and welfare.
Our culture has rejected use of irradiation to protect us from foodborne illness and disease. Current debates about modern plant breeding and genetic manipulation are heading in the same direction. The scientific community has a responsibility to become more involved in these debates. Above photo by John McColgan. The university's role is to add to our knowledge base and to put this information in the hands of those who need it.