Dispelling this confusion is crucial. We can consider levels of lethality and appropriateness of response. This paper argues that it is in our national interest to pioneer the peace before it lurches unpredictably into violence. Particular military competencies like order and discipline, organizational skills, and limited liability will likely continue to draw us into the storm. 12 Pioneering the peace is an appropriate military mission, and it is one we are qualified to undertake.
Preventive defense says 'Peace is too important to be left solely to the politicians'.
In some cases, peacespace dominance need not be a US mission. Other nations or international bodies who have forsworn the use of force might be better suited to these tasks. This force will be a catalyst for change. Both the United States and the United Nations have tackled peace missions with mixed results. 15 To secure the success that eluded us in the past requires a different approach.