Speakers of minority languages cannot afford to be against learning the dominant language surrounding them. They have no choice in the matter, as this language is essential for communication with their neighbours, sometimes literally in the next house. This does not mean, however, that they should discard their native language as if it were an impediment to progress. It is true that this has happened, dramatically in the case of Ireland, and still continues to happen in some of the smaller minorities. But acquisition of English or any other dominant language does not have to occur at the expense of the language of the home or community.
Most theorists agree that language remains the primary identity marker.
The slow yet perceptible development of academic theories exploring the links between identity, language and socio-economic development is becoming another important support mechanism for minority language communities. The centre's research could also point towards ways of developing an equitable language policy at EU level. It suggests the development of a language policy based on the same compensatory principles already used in agricultural and regional economic policies. Such a suggestion could help overcome the current narrow debate about the future of official languages in an enlarged Union. In a country such as Germany, where Turks far outnumber any indigenous language group, the issue can no longer be ignored.