A tolerable expertness in military movements is a business that requires time and practice. It is not a day, nor a week nor even a month, that will suffice for the attainment of it. To oblige the great body of the yeomanry and of the other classes of the citizens to be under arms for the purpose of going through military exercises and evolutions, as often as might be necessary to acquire the degree of perfection which would entitle them to the character of a well regulated militia , would be a real grievance to the people and a serious public inconvenience and loss. We hear likewise that the French are in a great Allarm in Dauphine and Bresse, not having at present 1500 Men of regulated Troops on that side. This paragraph shouldn't be necessary.
None have yet to be brought forth.
The first nine amendments were meant to preserve individual rights. The people are mentioned throughout the Bill of Rights. It is unlikely. Evidence of an individual right to keep and bear arms is presented throughout the Second Amendment section of GunCite, and will not be repeated here. First, let's look at the Bill of Rights itself.