Once you have started to enjoy the work of lopping off dead branches, it's hard to stop, and you may lose the power, or the will, to discriminate between dead branches and live ones. Here is Stove on Kant. Often Stove falls into the philosopher's disdain for mere facts. This is the case in that essay on female intellectual capacity, for example. Psychometricians have for some decades been measuring the smartness of women, and the results are not in any doubt.
Women have the same mean intelligence as men, but a smaller standard deviation.
Their bell curve is narrower, men's is flatter, but the peaks are in the same place. This fact is about as firmly established as the orbit of the moon, so that Stove's conclusions on the subject are plain wrong. If you are in two minds about whether you want to take up Against the Idols of the Age, I strongly recommend you to first read Steve on Stove. I am not entirely a tabula rasa for Stove's critiques, though. Reading Stove reinforced this, well, prejudice.