Those who agree with the Democratic candidates treat the whole affair as merely the latest episode in a struggle for equal civil rights. Indeed, proponents of permitting homosexuals to serve openly in the military invoke President Truman's executive order after World War II that integrated the U.S. military. Although it is popular to equate opposition to permitting homosexuals to serve openly in the military today with opposition to racial integration of the services five decades ago, the similarities between the two cases are superficial. D-Colo., when she argued that point. Skin color is a benign nonbehavioral characteristic.
Sexual orientation is perhaps the most profound of human behavioral characteristics.
Comparison of the two is a convenient but invalid argument. Congress agreed and subsequently reaffirmed the longstanding exclusion of open homosexuals from military service. This is an important fact that the Democratic candidates either don't understand or are ignoring for partisan political purposes. This law makes the historical prohibition against military service for homosexuals a matter of statute law. The policy does not have the force of law and could be repealed at the stroke of a pen.