We need instead to keep evolving, and elaborating our constructive alternative approach. We should, as the authors do well, not throw out the baby with the muddy bathwater. There are major elements of the neoclassical paradigm that socio-economics can subsume. Recognizing the role of self interest and the place of the individual are two such key elements. We need to accumulate findings, concepts, insights rather than each go on his or her own ego trip.
Science is a community effort, a common together of many.
Shaw and Zollers build on my effort, as my model builds on the works of many others. One could choose another base for socio-economics. But we need to use one paradigm and work with it, rather than go off in scores of directions. One of the reasons the neoclassicists are relatively powerful is that whatever differences there are among them, they all draw on the same basic paradigm. We need to specify the action implications of socio-economics.