Some will say that this analogy is true for art and engineering, but not for biological systems. Even though a fine painting or the Golden Gate Bridge obviously didn't just happen by chance, biological systems have ongoing processes that don't occur with paints or bridge components. I agree that this contention has some truth. Therefore, I still contend that complexity, whether in biological or nonbiological systems, can give evidence for design. One more comment.
Some scientists simply say that an intelligent design hypothesis has no place in science.
However, this assumption is generally made without scientific support as to why it is true. In fact, the search for intelligent design is used all the time in certain aspects of science. Similarly, archeological science looks for evidence of design and seeks the identity of the designers. On the other hand, in the case of living systems, we haven't ever seen one originated by a personal designer. One flaw with this response is that the same criticism can apply to saying evolution produced very diverse creatures.