Hence, where male pornography focuses on female sex objects, female pornography focuses on what Warren Farrell calls male success objects. Pornography, like rape, is a male invention, designed to dehumanize women, to reduce the female to an object of sexual access, not to free sensuality from moralistic or parental inhibition. This is a myth they promote to obscure that there are many ways to objectify someone. Most pornography for men objectifies women sexually. Typically, you can't buy it at your local grocery store.
Romance is used to sell women on almost every single product, from cars to food.
This inflammatory denunciation of male sexuality springs from the sexist assumption men cannot feel sexually aroused without there being some element of ridicule or desire to dominate. Pop-feminists really oppose male pornography because it undermines the sexual power of women. A man who can see naked women any time he finds it convenient is not a man very vulnerable to the coy hint of cleavage beneath a woman's blouse. If he's seen so many naked breasts that a woman who hides hers cannot use partial concealment to arouse his interest and, thereby manipulate him, then she has less power over him. Power, however, is not the reason they give because to admit it would undermine their efforts.