That's what I'm really good at. The second problem with non-originalism is suggested by what I call it. There is saying in politics that you can't beat somebody with nobody. It's the same thing for philosophies of constitutional interpretation. If you don't like originalism, and some originalism pause to debate.
Originalism has a lot of problems.
It's not always easy to do. Sometimes it's very hard. Sometimes it's awful hard to tell what the original meaning was. I'll acknowledge all of that. But the real problem is not whether it's the best thing in the world, but whether there's anything better.