Now I've named 4 women who have made serious scientific, technical or social contributions. To support your assertion, it's your turn to post 3996 contributions due to men's efforts. I also want to address your point that individuals must be considered individually. The unspoken thought bubble left hanging in the air is that people shouldn't be encouraged to explore all of their abilities- they should stick with what they are likely to be good at. I say, better to try things that are hard- if you never test your boundaries, you'll never fulfill your potential.
Men do have a higher percentage of geniuses for instance.
The other side of that is they have a higher percentage of autistics, mentally retarded, schizophrenics and criminal sociopaths. Quite often her idea was stolen by a man. I look forward to you substantiating your assertion. But individuals must be considered individually. I am arguing that it is simply not true.