Regardless of this most recent development, Coursey said evidence against Elmore was sufficient in all three of his trials. The evidence was strong, and 36 jurors agreed. But a man who testified against Elmore has since recanted. Initially, James Gilliam, who was in jail for violating parole, testified that Elmore confessed in jail. Now, Gilliam maintains as part of Elmore's appeal that he was told what to say in exchange for preferential treatment.
Officials deny that claim.
It can be difficult to prosecute cases this old, Jones said. Crucial witnesses may be deceased, such as Mr. Holloway, or have faded memories. Court records said Holloway suggested police look in Edwards' check register for suspects. Jones says the Elmore case is unique. Published reports said the first conviction was overturned because of mistakes by a judge, and the second conviction was overturned because of changes in the law.