Gives references for figures and includes figure captions. As above but not as well written. Fewer sources, more paraphrasing. May have omitted key parts such as page numbers, an abstract, a map, figure captions. 3.3 May cite fewer sources, and may be somewhat narrow in scope.
Writing is clear and easy to follow and most factual details are correct.
3.0 The paper appears more superficial. The topics discussed are not connected to each other. There is no significant geological explanation of the features described or the description suggests the issues are not well understood. Organization not as good. There may be factual errors.