I almost agree with you here. However, we differ over how this should be stated. Any specific belief about God is almost certain to be not completely right, and may be completely wrong, because it is impossible for us to have perfect knowledge of God. It is equally impossible for us to have perfect knowledge of anything else in the universe. They are in opposition when one upholds his religion as being the equal of science or as a valid alternative to science.
Religion deals with emotion while science deals with reality.
But, there is no logic that can be applied to support a claim for the existence of God. I could never have said that as well as you just did. Still, such a sentiment is pure emotion. It is not logic, nor is it support for the existence of God. So far as this discussion is concerned, God is defined as no more than a Being, whose exact nature is not relevant.