The national aggregate picture, however, masks significant variation at the state level and the local level.
Many states exhibit spending patterns that differ from one or more of the three national trends.
Key players in seven case study states offer a variety of explanations for the various spending disparities. The main explanation offered for a degree of balance in certain states is decentralized project selection procedures that include both suballocation of funds and participation from a wide range of the community. With these problems and potential solutions in mind, there are several actions that can be taken by RTC, all levels of government, and other concerned parties to address the various funding disparities. National Level RTC should publicize and make available the findings of this study to other key actors and interested parties. A strict set-aside program is not recommended.