That's one reason that you and I and others in the room were in Denmark yesterday, to witness a live fire and a demonstration that those Danish forces who are prepared to go to Kosovo will go in three weeks, but they were in the process of completing the training necessary for them to be effective and secure in that environment. So, we think more has to be done, we have to increase that as much as we can consistent with protecting the troops that are going. If I may follow up, NATO is an alliance that has been in effect for more than 50 years. It's been conducting exercises and training repeatedly all that time. As we've pointed out on so many occasions in that past, peacekeeping is not a primary mission, certainly of the U.S. forces, and I suspect that is the case for many of the other NATO countries as well.
Peacekeeping involves a different type of training, and capabilities.
What we need to do is to have more police on call, ready to deploy to Kosovo, as they were required to be deployed into Bosnia, we need much more in the way of civil implementation than is currently taking place. But the forces that are trained are trained for a different type of mission, or have been trained for a different type of mission, and so there has been some gap in sense of the training for the peacekeeping mission which is not necessarily consistent with the warfighting mission we've had in the past. Many of the forces are committed in substantial numbers to other areas, for example the British have substantial commitments to Northern Ireland, they are committed to Cyprus and to other areas, and so this does represent a significant contribution on the part of individual members to the Kosovo operation as they are also committed to Bosnia itself. Not every nation is fully prepared with their forces to go into Kosovo, so it's taking some time. I think each country will have to answer for itself on that.