Before you poo-poo the idea, think about it. It would be a completely analogous situation to what we're discussing right now. That Jesus became human is most significant. Believe me, I've read a lot of writings on the other side of the issue, many of which were extremely well-written. But in the end, I personally don't find that they hold water, and I'm not alone in that assessment.
Some conservative writers see an attack on the priesthood in inclusive language.
I'm not at all that paranoid. Todd, you must admit that these specific examples from the Creed we've discussed here are surely the most MILD examples of inclusive language in action. Serious translations have been put forth and circulated in Catholic circles which carry things much further. In history, musicology, whatever, accuracy of translation is of the utmost importance. I don't see how liturgical and Scriptural translation shouldn't be held to the same rigorous standard of accuracy.