The process can be very broad-based, including not just the obvious players but representatives from the Chamber of Commerce, League of Women Voters, etc. The recommendations of the report can be implemented by a broad-based committee or board. State planning is a continuous process, not a one-shot deal. In Washington, an annual Access to Justice Conference develops recommendations and designates organizations to implement them, deals with a broad range of issues, recently including education of media, building endowment for legal services, public legal education. Aspirational goals in a state plan need to be coupled with concrete goals, work plans, time lines, and evaluation processes.
Ongoing tasks can include coordination of pro bono, development, and technology.
Passing state funding through the state supreme court or another part of court system can be effective. The key to success is maintaining a statewide perspective. Boundaries should be invisible in terms of services and clients. Programs share responsibility for ensuring access to the system throughout the state. Maximize funding for state as a whole.