The implementation of the transfer support services outlined in the report of the Transfer Articulation Task Force in October of last year appears to be in jeopardy because of the absence of funding. Promising initiatives of the recent past ultimately failed because of a lack of funding support. Four alternatives for funding statewide initiatives appear to be available. Each has advocates. Each has serious problems.
None are easy.
The project would then move forward with appropriate reports to the sponsoring parties. It is possible to implement this alternative more quickly than any of the other alternatives. It does not require permission or concurrence by any outside party. This alternative may be seen as a diversion of funds from district priorities. The appropriateness of the allocation among the districts can be contentious.