O is entitled to the property. O gets the property, B gets a lawsuit against T. 2. T is a thief. T. Therefore, under both common law and the U.C.C., O is entitled to recover the TV from B, and B is left having to find and sue T. 2.
T is a bailee.
T does not have good title to the diamonds because O did not transfer title to T through either sale or gift. At common law, O did not create voidable title in T because O had no intent to transfer the diamonds to T . Thus, T had void title and could pass no title to his son. In addition, the son probably did not take the diamond in good faith, because his father warned him not to ask questions. However, there is no indication that T normally sells diamonds legitimately, and, in any case, the son is not a BFP for the reasons discussed above.