When they find out, they demand that the images be removed. Whatever the reality, after all this controversy, there may be a happy ending in store for the pair of researchers. In the wake of the Rimm scandal, he thinks they'll have better luck finding a journal to accept it. This paper examines the nature and content of 150 randomly selected pornographic images available through newsgroups located on the Internet computer network. Using content analysis, we identify themes which appear most frequently, and explore differences in the type of material posted by commercial and non-commercial users.
Page numbers are in parentheses.
Since both studies talk about similar topics, many parallel constructions could be coincidences. Rimm never mentions the Mehta-Plaza study in his paper. He asked how we calculated reliability, and we told him. It's in there, but he didn't use it. I don't think he knew how.