Proponents of TFT seek quick confirmation of their theories through unrepresentative case studies. Instead of methodologically sound research, TFT presents anecdotes and testimonials as evidence. Vivid anecdotes make for dramatic presentations but poor proof. Pseudosciences are often engaged in shameless self-promotion and profit seeking. Skepticism is almost totally lacking, perhaps because of an inherent monetary conflict of interest.
Pseudosciences keep methods a secret, preventing independent investigation.
Pseudosciences appeal to pseudo-authority. VT Finally, pseudosciences make dramatic and overstated claims. Showing that TFT has the characteristics of a pseudoscience does not necessarily make it false. Many clinicians attest to the treatment's effectiveness and this cannot be ignored. While I do not feel it is wise to take the word of Callahan about TFT's overinflated success rates without any confirming data, I do believe that the treatment may produce benefits in some individuals.