Dr. Cheryl Engber, assistant professor of English, senior Caroline Hernandez and junior David Baden spoke against the bill. Madonia said having English as an official language would enforce unity and build a standard. He also said it would create a national identity and save the government money. Crumpler agreed and said the bill would also improve communication. If there is no common language, there is a greater chance for miscommunication.
Problems can arise.
Others argued that setting English as the primary language would be discriminating against minorities and would be unnecessary, as English is already the most widely used. She also said having English as the official language could deny rights to minorities and the elderly, giving little opportunity for people to learn. She said people could be denied voting rights and access to health care, and there would be a danger of anti-immigrant sentiment. Baden added there is no need for legislation. Crumpler said the legislation may save money that could be used for other services.