The same studies developed in Australia and London in the early nineteen-eighties. This fact indicates that influence of nature has more significance than nurture. Referring to the mountain of the compiled data they concluded that identical twins reared apart were as much alike as identical reared together. According to what they said we could read that they have moved even to the further conclusion that the influence of the parents is not as much as had been supposed. Lawrence Wright noted that Minnesota has stunningly tipped the balance in the nurture-nature debate.
Nature now seems to be more important than nurture.
Although studies of Sandra Scarr on the correlation of IQ and Race in the beginning indicated that the environment has a significance influence to the IQ, she doesn t make a further conclusion that environment gives a more significant effect to the development of human being than gene. Genes are components in a system that organizes the organism to experience the world. Again, their conclusion is that nature is more important than nurture. The first is in the sociological-political level. The second impact is in the Catholic theological themes .