It ends up being a flim-flam. And it really gets away from what we need to be doing, and that is talking, negotiating. I have a website, and that website discusses this proposal, and we welcome the input from people, because we really need to have participation, and start a new dialogue. The daily work of human interaction, of people cooperating and working together and creating a new vision in this new millennium. When we saw, in city after city, people letting go of their fear this new years eve, and letting go of the predictions of Armageddon, of Y2K failure of all kinds of support systems, of some kind of cataclysm being visited on the day of the new millennium.
People are ready for that.
We are seeing it. This idea of annihilation needs to continue to be balanced with the hope and the joy that we have as human beings for expression of ourselves and hope for others. We are at a moment in time where we can it's all still within our hands. And even though the policy-makers, and the Pentagon, some of them would envision this scenario of assured destruction, even though we have some people in elected office in Washington who want to conjure that, we can through our collective consciousness, create peace, through our desire to see peace, inform policies which are pacific. And we need to do that.