S. Frank is not troubled by the objectification, the objectivisation of the we set over the human order. On the outside, from the objective order, from the human I there is no transcending, and there is but objectivisation, wherein the transcending is only on the inside. It is a striking aspect, that for S. Frank religious faith coincides with a monism of two worlds. Religion is monism, whereas every dualism is anti-religious. But there is indeed possible a religiosity, connected with the experiencing of contradiction, suffering and evil, and this especially mustneeds be said for the religion of redemption.
Religion surmounts the inescapable dualism, but within it there is a dualistic moment.
While moreover, monism often becomes non-religious. S. Frank bases himself upon a revelation in common , and this is completely correct for a philosophy of religion. And it is true actually, when he says that each man has his own especial religion. I consider the freedom of S. Frank as a thinker especially invaluable. From the point of view of the philosophy of All-Unity, the problem of the relationship between God and the freedom of man remains unresolved.