There is another one, Resolution 687. A violation of Resolution 687 constitutes that there is a violation of resolution 678. But each country has the right to judge which kinds of actions are violating the resolutions. The resolutions do not refer to the interpretation itself. We think that if the interpretation is right then such kinds of action can be taken.
Nothing is referred to in the resolution.
If the interpretation is right, then it is okay. We think it is right. We have been trying to ascertain the number of casualties, but we have not been able to do so yet. I heard that President William Jefferson Clinton of the United States wanted to contact Prime Minister Obuchi, but the Prime Minister was in Hanoi, in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, and due to some technical reasons, he could not. Ambassador Saito was instead informed first.