The idea behind the function of the House should be preserved, even if some changes are neccesary in the actual structure. Through these organisms, that are really in touch with what happens in the different regions, particular Societies could have their interests adequately represented. Another important question is that of the relations between Psychoanalysis and the academic world. I feel that the attacks on Psychoanalysis that come from the academic world, should be responded from within it. In my experience we have nothing to fear from this.
Psychoanalysis also remains relatively isolated from the community.
I believe we should be very active in promoting psychoanalytical clinics in which patients can be seen for reduced fees, as is the case in many Societies, but unfortunately not in all. Psychoanalyts also should not be afraid to address public issues of relevance to their context. The IPA is full of Commitees , far too many of them. Frequently the mandates they receive superimpose themselves among them. I believe it would be convenient to reduce the number of Commitees, specify very clear mandates and compose them with members with real expertise, not just the wish to appear in the Roster.