She interposed her power between the Pope and his enemies who plotted his death, and left John Paul II many years to serve her and her Son's Church, to bring it into the new time, to the age of a new evangelization he himself had launched. Those who go on suggesting that somehow Pope John Paul II compromised the purity of Catholic belief improperly recognized some religious effectiveness outside the Catholic Church's formal purview, imprudently honored the religious consciences of some not specifically adherents of Catholicism have to now answer for themselves what are the implications of evidence from above about a Pope so obviously under divine care. I doubt Heaven would join in such a deception. The fulfilled prophecy prompts other questions. Roman, Jewish, barbarian, Muslim persecutions might be attributed to cultural tendencies of past times.
Moderns pretend to enlightened toleration of all views.
They accept apologies and even demand them for past intolerances, particularly those done in the name of religion. But about anti-Catholicism modern liberals are silent to the point of appearing sympathetic. Insults done in the name of artistic expression are defended. Vandalism done in the name of the right to be accepted go underreported and unrebuked. Popes, who have long since been dismissed as irrelevant, are nevertheless chastised for not doing enough against racial persecutions.