Since such calculations are fantasies, they conclude, the scholarship is really just psychobabble. Since the book's release, they've gone on to issue a gleeful public challenge, inviting anyone who can prove such passages meaningful to come forward. Kristeva confuses set and interval. Baudrillard misappropriates non-Euclidian spaces. Trivia, they say, masquerades in these writings as radical wisdom.
Technical jargon is a smoke screen for vapidity.
The rest is metahistory. All rights reserved.