And considering that the birth of its theory was essentially in the 1920's, that 75 years hence still finds an inability to reach a consensus, suggests something vital is lacking. This is not to undermine the literally miraculous caliber of genius responsible for the development of this theory. Rather, a critique is forthcoming regarding what appears to be a remarkably simple oversight in the theory's philosophical application. That is to say, once the theory was developed, tested and substantiated, it was then applied to the 'real world' along with the standard phenomenological questions surrounding it, resulting in unexpectantly deep answers to shallow questions and, unfortunately, shallow and confusing answers to the deep and meaningful questions. There is no deep reality.
Reality is created by observation.
And with the advent of this view the physics community became sharply divided. And this is precisely where the entire thing is fatally flawed, along with the other derivative variations on this theme. It can't be emphasized enough, how vital and pivotal the role of the observer plays in the entire drama of quantum physics. This has greater implications. The 'answer' can be found in deep metaphysics .