The wise judgment of these ministers is also well seen in the answers about the commandments where they rejected some proofs and added others freely. These proofs are the ones generally used by commentators and expositors. In many cases the italicised words by themselves do not make sense, and are sometimes not a sentence at all. The proofs to Q. 62 have no italics whatever. Unfortunately they were restored with uncritical fidelity.
Some later modifications are worth mentioning.
It was based on the original set, and contains numerous modifications. These changes are very uneven in value, and taken as a whole are hardly to be considered an improvement. The work is badly marred by poor proof reading, there being between thirty and forty misprints in the references. This is due to the desire to give each separate clause of the answer its individual proof, and it is very well done. There is a small amount of redundancy, which would tax a child's memory unduly.