This is tantamount to saying that structure is structural. They could differ only in degree of conceptual elaboration. Coins do not count themselves, but counting is just a conceptualization of activity, an arbitrary or pragmatic structure of experience with no intrinsic meaning. If all of mind is a set of structures constructed by unknown principles, none of it, and nothing at all, can have any intrinsic meaning or value. Structures come and structures go.
Some structures confer meaning on other structures, but only by structural convention.
Some are considered more true or more real than others, but only by convention. I wonder if Muller is aware of this implication of the theory. Further, since 0-D theory is itself a conceptual structure, it also has no intrinsic meaning and is neither true nor false, except to the extent to which it conforms to generally accepted rules for stating theories in a proper manner. We cannot take its claims of non-MIR seriously, for there is no criterion against which to judge them. In effect, 0-D theory ultimately describes a mindless functional machine.