In fact, if the BRS data are reliable they show nine other test species also developed antibodies to rabbit hemorrhagic disease when they did not receive the larger virus dose given the Kiwi. Officials are now in the indefensible position of having to insist that all the following species, humans, hares, foxes, dogs, mice, bush rats, brown falcons, ferrets, pigeons, Silver gulls, bandicoots, wombats, echidnas, Kiwis, and bats developed rabbit hemorrhagic disease antibodies in the absence of infection. In other words, officials appear to be superimposing their own answers without regard for the scientific data rather than letting the data speak for itself. If the human antibody data is as entangled, and wrongly reported as the test animal serology data, this must be immediately opened for unbiased peer assessment. The NRA has no rational or moral responsibility left on this subject except for the immediate suspension of rabbit hemorrhagic disease registration prior to the scheduled 9 October 1996 release in New South Wales.
Time is very short.
My heart is with you and your people. God help you all. Your country is being led down a one way street of unknown risk.