A poor lyric is information about its own paucity of resource. That doesn't mean the latter cannot be a great song. There is nothing inherently better about a dumb song than one which calls attention to the intelligence of its writer. It's a matter of taste, but meaning is often a subterfuge to distract the listener's attention from a writer's lack of multiple resources. When the semiotician suspects allusiveness without corresponding exact reference, he charges the poet with nonsense.
Nonsense is a loaded word, the meaning of which is unclear.
Had it discernible rhythm, it might be termed 'rhythm allusive' but my example lacks even that. The only way on earth such a sentence would likely get written is as an example of a null allusive set. The exception that proves the rule. That way lies true nonsense, even unto deconstruction. Yet the little bugger of a jingle persists and seems to move hearts.