I don't see myself changing this trend. For me kritiks need explanation as to their bearing in the round. Kritik explanations that conclude with asking me to reject the affumative have less weight than those that ask me to reject the affirmative because of the future implications of the kritik. I am open to virtually any type of counterplan, but the negative has to be able to defend its viability. Generic solvency evidence tends to work against you.
Permutations are tests, unless highlighted as something else.
It just makes sense that you would want to have the counterplan text or the permutations written out to protect yourselves. And in some instances, I can't figure out how those cards clarified a position. Please don't read the last two statements as an indictment of kritiks. Rather, reflect upon how you can clarify the content of the cards or make the explanation more concrete. I do not, however, put myself in a position where I am literally reconstructing the round based on virtually every card read.