This is open to misunderstanding. It might be construed to mean that our conclusions are simply a matter of taste, which they are not. Though we explore in a culturally-conditioned way, the reality we sketch is universal. This in turn, implies a commonality of human worth. If we treasure our own experience and regard it as real, we must also treasure other people's experience.
Reality is no less precious if it presents itself to someone else.
All are discoverers, and if we disenfranchise any, all suffer. For example, if seeing is a skill, then we should rely on those who have that skill to determine what science we do. In Canada, we routinely offend against this principle. We have, for example, numerous 'Centres of Excellence' because we recognize that the skill on which discovery depends is possessed by a few. But then we proceed in evaluating such centres, to give only a legislated twenty percent weight to 'excellence'.