However, Judge Kedmi let the panel who would deal with this petition, to consider again the motion for amendment, if the petitioner would choose not to file another petition. The petitioner apparently chose not to file another petition. We reconsidered his request to amend his petition and concluded that the was no reason to approve this motion, as Judge Kedmi had decided. In view of the chain of events, this petition should be denied, since petitioner was satisfied when the Commissioner's answer was given to him and he had not requested another relief in this petition. Obviously, petitioner may file another petition.
Petition is denied.
Judge Levin denied making an unexcusable pretext. Thus I conclude that the Israeli judiciary system is administered by individuals, some of them place their personal and political agendas before the law. They twist their own rules and regulations for the sake of obtaining unfair advantage over helpless citizens.