Networks are a form of democracy, based not on representation but upon direct participation. Egalitarian does not mean there is no leadership in networks. Indeed, in successful networks, there are many leaders. Network leadership is plural and flexible. There is more opportunity for people to be leaders since networks need more leaders more often than hierarchies and bureaucracies.
Networks link work to personal values, the most compelling source of motivation without coercion.
Leadership in a network cannot depend upon force or policies for control. It is the appeal to shared values and common purpose that binds a network. People feel good about contributing in a network, feel valued by peers, and have an increased sense of self-worth. Autonomy and participation are complements. Networks support the independence, integrity, and creativity of their members.