That's not an accident. It's a homicide. We've got to change our thinking in these kind of cases. Your Honor, I'm going to object to the characterization of 'our thinking' that coincides on a personal belief with the belief of the community, and that's objectionable under State versus Jordan . Overruled. . . . .
People are on their way with their families to church.
Objection, Your Honor, as to other people on their way to church. That's not a fact in this case. Lafoe argues that because the trial court overruled his objections, he suffered prejudice and was denied a fair trial. The State counters that the comments were reasonably related to the evidence or reasonably inferred from the evidence. The State further argues that even if this court finds that the comments were improper, any error was harmless.