And if that happens, you will find yourself on the other side, facing a panel of randomly chosen arbiters with unlimited authority to decide what to do about the alleged abuse of your temporary power. These self-imposed limits are based on the natural need for people to avoid offending each other, which is the basis of natural government, and the principle of the random arbiter system. If a random arbiter system would provide anyone in any position, any motive contrary to the natural motive to avoid any kind of offensive action, I would appreciate it very much if someone would explain it to me. It takes power to limit power. But the trap is the temptation to keep our hands on that power, fearing that without our artificial control and limitations, it might become a terror.
Natural limitations are flawless.
But they cannot function until and unless we understand and agree to let go of it by eliminating all options for anyone to deliberately control any use of power, whether offensively for personal gain, or defensively to limit an opposing power. The trap is compounded by the fact that opposing power strugglers usually see themselves as the defenders and each other as aggressors. It is very easy for people to disagree on who is the aggressor and who is the defender. The practical effect is that power is power, no matter how it is categorized. When you learned to ride a bicycle, you had to take both feet off the ground, and then pedal.