The costs and processes involved in the implementation of electronic communication systems can create the illusion that we are dealing with an entity that is new and different from communication mechanisms to which we have become accustomed. In reality, the communication freedoms inherent in our society and absolutely vital to the learning process in our academic institutions remain unchanged whether the information is communicated verbally, in a textbook, or through a favorite web site. Policy Creep Policy development represents an attempt by a system to gain control and establish ground rules over phenomena that are partially understood by the system and often perceived as threatening. Policies are designed based upon perceptions of individuals within systems regarding what is good and right for the system's survival. There is nothing inherently wrong with policy, but we must always be cognizant that policy represents much more to a system than words on paper that ultimately are filed in a notebook on a dusty office shelf.
Policies reflect and communicate the values and human perspectives of the system.
This is the dynamic nature of system life. As a system's perspectives change, so will its policies. This is why it is crucial for any system to be exceedingly thoughtful and forward thinking when involved in policy development. The development of USD's Electronic Communications Acceptable Use Policy mirrors the typical policy development process. I believe that the policy, for the most part, reflects a reasoned and fair approach given its focus.