Philosophers have argued for ages over the paradox of foundationalism. Truths can justify each other. In 2000, the public rejected political foundationalism. It rejected the notion that legitimacy springs from an incontestable election result. There was no incontestable result, nor was one necessary.
Political decisions can justify each other.
The Founders hoped to create a political system that was better than politicians. I can defend the candidates' behavior, but their style is another matter. Gore is more like Richard Nixon, who could make the Sermon on the Mount sound conniving. Bush is more like Dan Quayle, who could make the Gettysburg Address sound jejune. Call me when you've sorted it out.