But she did tell her lawyer that, and they attempted to use it. But, again, it is the President's state of mind that mattersand what his intent was on the false affidavit. And then that same false affidavit was later used in the court, and the President knew it was false. And we have seen the deposition testimony, with the President sitting, listening to his lawyer talk about that affidavit when he submitted it. Of course he couldn't tell what he was thinking.
Nobody is a mind reader.
But this was a critical affidavit at that time which was going to cut off critical testimony in that case, and you can just about guarantee, I would say 100 percent, that the President was indeed listening very carefully, knew that his lawyer was submitting a false affidavit, and did nothing to stop it. That is another count of obstruction of justice. And they say, well, nothing happened between the first time and the second time. I am not so sure legally that matters. The job situation Mr. Hutchinson will talk about later.