Historians continue to pour through newly-opened archives in search of clues which might reveal the perceptions, analysis, and intentions of the Finnish and Russian governments. It is increasingly clear that Stalin is a sinister, calculating individual who would have destroyed Finland had he possessed sufficient time and resource. World War Two ends before Stalin acts upon his dark intentions. Finland must reassess its actions during these pre-war years and ponder alternatives which may have obviated or at least postponed Stalin's hostile designs upon Finland. It is imprudent to suggest that war or hostility is completely avoidable, but one should question if negotiators overlook crucial alternatives which were within grasp.
Much attention is focused upon the past.
But Finland and Russia exist in the present, and the past merely shapes the character of their present relationship. This fact is most evident during Finnish president Halonen's June 2000 state visit to Moscow where she meets Vladimir Putin. During an informal period of open questions, a Finnish correspondent asks Putin about the return of Finnish Karelian territory seized by Russia during these war years. Putin responds tersely and succinctly. Halonen clearly leaves the door open for future talks between Finland and Russia regarding the return of seized Karelian territory.