I find their approach deeply unprincipled. Russ Feingold's pretty good as well. Senators Grassley and Hatch are guaranteed to propose awful legislation, and Henry Hyde was responsible for the deeply repressive form the CDA took. It's hard to generalize for all children, and EFF doesn't purport to be a parenting-policy organization, but I personally think children should be given complete access to the Internet as soon as they're old enough to ask for complete access to it. Hardware and software that allow computers to communicate with each other, usually as peers.
Networks turn computers into communication machines.
And when we're not knowledgeable enough, we go out and teach ourselves what we need to know. Legal precedents don't have to be technology-dependent, which is why they are sometimes awfully useful. A case involving a BBS from the 1980s may be a valid precedent applying to AOL in the 1990s. EFF has taken no stance on MP3, but we generally oppose any attempt to suppress new technologies based on the fears of copyright-holders. That said, willful copyright infringement is a bad thing, and EFF doesn't support it.