We can however, call it a soft-science. The soft sciences are not as dedicated to empiricism. Empiricism is the practice of relying upon observation and experiment. A tenet is arrived at empirically, that is, through experience. Similar conclusions are arrived at through similar experience.
Replication of results is the cornerstone of experimental science.
In contrast, the experience of the individual is the cornerstone of pseudoscience, regardless of whether anyone else experiences the same phenomenon or whether the experience is able to be duplicated. While all science attempts to achieve results, pseudo- science has much difficulty with maintaining one variable consistently in the course of experimentation, if experimentation is used at all. The control variables may be too numerous and double-blind experimentation either absent or inadequately understood. Many followers, readers and students of the soft sciences are really followers of pseudoscience. The difference between a scientist and a pseudoscientist is that the scientist easily or more easily accepts that his theory is wrong when data says so.