He cheerfully admits he is. But he points out that so is almost everyone else in the subject of Creation v Evolution. Perhaps on the creation side this is true but on the science side this is far from true. I guess we have a diasgreement. Of course not but the attack should be scientific not based on lawyer arguments.
Most species exhibit no directional change during their tenure on earth.
Both stasis as well as sudden appearance are very compatible with neo-darwinism. To require a 'creator' only complicates matters.