Originally proposed to serve schools, libraries and eventually other institutions such as hospitals, through the joint efforts of telecommunications, cable and other industries, the plan was tabled last year. The newly revamped plan looks quite similar to the original measure, but will likely garner greater acceptance based on its inclusion of other significant participants. The new plan simply fills in some of the details that were omitted from the previous measure. We support the task force's recommendation, however the group should reconsider the name. The state is wise to involve other parties, particularly private industries who are on the cutting edge of progress, so the state can avoid owning or operating a system that is obsolete before it is put into use.
Private parties can ensure that whatever system is implemented is expandable and compatible.
Iowa has been the leader on a state-wide technology network. The system is widely used and has proven a worthwhile investment, but the state shouldn't be the owners of the system. Kansas' proposal for a system neither owned or operated by the state, but contracted to a private-industry entity to provide equal access, is worthwhile. Iowa's system is used extensively by schools, colleges and government entities for video-conferencing and continuing education. The system has enabled organizations throughout the state to efficiently meet to discuss challenges and opportunities for their respective groups and has proved especially helpful for rural and otherwise isolated communities.