Adapted from resource materials from Applied theory and Practice Program, the Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia. Joint problem solving could also involve a third party such as a mediator or enforcer. We will take a closer look at this in part 2 of this workshop. The joint problem-solving process does not always result in the resolution of the problem or conflict. This does not necessarily indicate that the joint effort at negotiation or problem solving is a failure, because there are other beneficial outcomes that could result.
Parties come to complete agreement on issues raised.
Parties consent to one set of solutions for all issues raised, although this was not the first priority of all parties. Parties reach a partial agreement in which they agree or consent to some issues and temporarily agree to suppress, redirect, or set aside others. New channels are developed and insights are discovered about the other party. Parties recognize that a non-joint process serves their interests better and move toward it. One party or a few parties control which issues or options will be discussed or considered.