23 Kan. App.
Parol evidence is permitted where a contract is procured or induced by fraud.
Under the facts of this case, the rule remains the same even when the contract contains a provision that no oral representations had been made. Extrinsic evidence of fraud does not contradict or vary the terms of a written contract. It merely shows that no binding contract was ever made. Evidence which tends to show the circumstances under which a contract was executed does not violate the parol evidence rule. Opinion filed November 22, 1996.