Job safety analyses are reviewed regularly according to company policy would not seem to fulfill the mandate, as company policy is often, of necessity, profit-driven, and thus is not always the safest standard to follow. On section P7 but also several other times throughout the text of the standards, legislation or law should be included alongside regulation or company policy when workers are instructed to follow some external standard. Especially at the State level, safety requirements are often spelled out in statute as well as in regulations, thus knowledge of and compliance with legislation is as important as is compliance with regulation and company policy. Changes are being incorporated. In section P7, the Key Activity Monitor equipment and operator performance, several of the Performance Indicators should perhaps be modified to include a reasonably believes clause.
Revisions are to be made.
A suggestion, similar to your reasonably believes clause, is a recommended by our MSSC Subject Matter Experts. On section HSE 1, the importance levels for Math and Science under Academic and Employability Skills would appear to be reversed. Presently, they imply that front-line workers must possess a more sophisticated understanding of these matters than managers or supervisors. Given that most of that Critical Work Function is, by definition, a supervisory function, this would appear to be counterintuitive. The importance levels are not reversed.