Although Nature 's editors regard it as essential that any technical failings noted by referees are addressed, they are not so strictly bound by referees' opinions as to whether a particular paper belongs in Nature . Nature 's editors may also ask referees of submitted Articles whether, in the referee's view, the paper could be condensed to a Letter without loss of essential information. Competitors Some of the referees to whom an editor might consider sending a paper may be engaged in competing work that could influence their opinion. To avoid such conflicts of interest, Nature requires potential referees to disclose any conflicts or commercial interest before undertaking to review a paper, and requires referees not to copy papers or to circulate them to unnamed colleagues. Speed Nature makes decisions about submitted papers as rapidly as possible.
Nature makes every effort to provide rapid delivery of referees' reports.
Most referees honour their prior agreement with Nature to report on a paper within seven days or other agreed time limit, and most referees send reports by email. Referees are chased by phone, fax or email if they have not delivered their report within the agreed time. Of course, every author believes that his or her paper is important, particularly in highly competitive fields, and entitled to the quickest possible handling. Nature strives to provide this service for all submitted papers. In exceptional cases, if the work described in a submitted paper seems to the editors to be so important that it would be considered a privilege to be asked to review it, and if the editors know of competing similar work in press elsewhere, Nature can offer a fast-track procedure in which a paper is refereed within 48 hours and is typeset before receipt of the referees' reports in the expectation that major alterations will not be required in the light of the reports.