This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. Presiding Judge, Kalitowski, Judge, and Willis, Judge. Mother argues that her admission to the facts supporting the petition to terminate her parental rights was made in violation of Minn. R. Juv. Because of the alleged procedural errors in her admission and because she asserts that the district court did not properly consider the child's best interests, she argues that the district court erred in terminating her parental rights.
Mother is severely chemically dependent.
She has been intermittently involved in alcohol dependency treatment since 1990. In fact, at one point while pregnant with B.M.S., she was admitted to the hospital with a blood alcohol content of .35. B.M.S. and his infant sister were at the home at the time mother lost consciousness, with no one to care for them. After a July 31 hearing, mother was placed on an open ward at another treatment center where she ingested hair spray. Her October 7 provisional discharge was revoked on October 27 after she went on a three-day drinking binge.