The question is whether and how it can be reversed. Thinking concering a multi-layered system of work is a step towards an answer. The possibility of redefining work and employment, in order to broaden the pattern of engagement and rewards, is not considered. The struggle around the issues and possibilities identified above is certain to continue. By contrast, for the disadvantaged, awaiting clarity on these issues is a luxury they cannot afford.
People have only a limited capacity to be nourished and sheltered by theories and promises alone.
It is highly questionable whether the increasing efficiencies required of businesses in increasingly competitive markets can increase the quality of life of the average person rather than continue to erode it. Rather than require proven solutions, when theory and practice is wanting, another approach could well be taken. The issue is not the nature of the experiment, but rather the desire of groups of people to engage in experiment at the local level. Attention needs to be given to the minimum constraints and the nature of any facilitating legislation. But it is for groups of people to pursue their understanding of what might ensure sustainable community for them.