That's what explained his rise last time, Peck declares. That's what explains his survival this time around. Those currently suing him, or those bitter at losing personal savings in past deals, offer a different explanation. They acknowledge the tireless work habits. In court cases, they also accuse him of shady dealings, of using associates as fronts to advance his interests.
Peck calls such charges sour grapes from vindictive losers.
Two lawsuits in State Superior Court will test the proposition. The Wild Rose house is an example of the questions that arise from the '90s dealings of Arnold Peck. The woman who bought the house, Lorraine Hillgen, was surprised to hear Arnold Peck's name mentioned at the closing. Arnold can explain, he says. The house was in disrepair, was losing value.