3 Meetings, speeches, or publications which attempt to disturb the tranquillity of the state are punishable. Since the First Amendment should have protected the people from the state, and not the other way around, the very concept of sedition is repugnant to the proper meaning of this provision of the First Amendment. That the concept of sedition endures in spite of the amendment is due to the failure of the people to insist upon the inviolability of the amendment. 3 See the article Criminal Procedure on page 1 of the Frontiersman for March, 1995. I'll provide a copy upon request.
People usually get the kind of government they deserve.
A contract must be understood according to what it says, and not according to what somebody believes the writer meant to say. In the fifth and sixth provisions, the language is incomplete. The writers used one word in the first provision, a different word in the second provision, and a third word in the third and fourth provisions. No one knows what word they might have intended for the fifth and sixth provisions. Lacking proper language, no enforceable interpretation of these provisions is possible.