Pure freedom can abolish itself freely, in the same way that procedural democracy can abolish itself democratically. If democracy is reduced to procedures by which the majority-will of the people is expressed, a majority vote suffices to abolish democracy as was done in 411 B.C. when the Assembly of the people at Athens enacted an end to their democracy. If all choices are equal, logically I must deny the universal character of the rights of man. Of all the contradictions in which dogmatic relativism is ensnared, this one is the most visible in practice. Taken to its conclusion, this relativism leads to the claim that no one can prefer, take care, or protect any culture except his own.
Pure freedom knows no limit.
Pure liberty subverts everything, including liberty itself. This position does not truly inspire respect for conscience. Psychology operates in the same way as logic - pure freedom tends to subvert liberty. Doubtless it is a matter of blindness, but is also one of duplicity. Its logical incoherence has its own logic that relativizes dogmatic relativism.