Something more is required. And it isn't really a matter of simple sharing. The whole solution can be designed, not in terms of redistribution, but of reinvestment. We don't need redistribution - we need reinvestment in our own markets at unprecedented, colossal levels. And this takes a lot of design.
Most people stop at the platitude level.
Hyde delves deeper. He wants real social progress in his lifetime. To date, we've mistaken technological glitz for social progress and gotten awfully self-congratulatory about it. I now focus on something deeper in the history of language , namely, the history of sharing and the evolving technology of sharing - because that's what enables progress in variability and survivability. That means we have to maximize harmonious diversity, which, despite its paradoxical nature, is as good a definition of 'beauty' as there is.