The work shows the ability to make critical connections between the historical, cultural, political, social and economic contexts. It provides an appropriate level of detail to demonstrate knowledge and skills development. The work draws on multiple research sources and shows good bibliographic, annotation and synthesizing skills. Written and oral work shows logical and clear thought and expression, unity and coherence of analysis and creativity. There are a few spelling, punctuation and grammar errors, but they do not seriously interfere with meaning or reading.
Presentations are generally professional and somewhat original.
Student is usually prepared and contributes to the group learning process. The work is essentially average . It remains at the surface level and is more descriptive than analytical. It does not make use of original thought or response to the material. There is evidence of difficulty in synthesizing material and reflecting critically its context.