Clearly a story of real news value, written with editor's needs in mind. He or she might well spike another news story to make room for this one. The writer has not fully exploited the news potential in the material. The basic information may be in place but the story has no news value. The story's best 5 W's have been exploited, and the other key ideas have been assigned their place in the marshalling of points to support the message and validate the news angle.
Paragraphs methodically develop the argument, in descending order, with effective use of quotes.
The story's 5 W's can be identified. Other key ideas are present but could be arranged more effectively in support of the message. No quotes, or they're bland, or poorly identified, or don't move the story forward. The writer does not seem to have definitely decided on all 5 W's, or has otherwise left out key information. Release too short.