And as far as this univerise existing, I have no idea what you are tring to say in english, it isn't clear. After all, we have that right to be evident or responsible for or our own Ideas. However I do not know you, and that is my free will, to reject nature, or heed the word of God. That is all I choose to say, cause I could be wrong, think I will finish my beer. What I was arguing is that if we assume your position then we cannot even affirm your position, because it would be a position that would be determined by prior brain state and chemical reaction.
New thoughts can have antecedent causes.
We never invented laws of nature, we just discovered what was already there. In other words, everything you do or think is determined by prior causes. Science, however, can never prove anything absolutely. Again though, none of this supports an idea of free will.