The trial court findings were not clearly erroneous. Appellant next challenges his commitment to Cambridge. The trial court found that the Brown County Family Service Center, through its social worker Sandberg, was of the opinion appellant should be committed to Cambridge as soon as space was available. It noted that Brown County had previously made extreme efforts to place appellant in a residential setting and tried alternatives to an inpatient facility. The court found no alternative less restrictive than Cambridge existed that would be consistent with appellant's treatment needs and community safety.
Meaningful review requires sufficient evidence and trial court findings.
Appellant contends the court committed him to Cambridge without any description of the program. He contends he should be given an opportunity to continue in a community-based program that will not include female caregivers and that will address his aggressive behaviors. The record shows appellant needed the more structured program at the regional treatment center, that appellant posed a danger to others, and that placement at the community facility was not appropriate. Further, the social worker explained that the Minnesota Extended Treatment Options Program at Cambridge provided treatment for patients like appellant who are mentally retarded sex offenders. The trial court determination is based upon sufficient evidence and findings and is not clearly erroneous.