The depth of the regression analysis necessary will depend on the nature and complexity of the case and the extent of the damages involved. Another important aspect of damage analysis is the principle of mitigation. This principle suggests that even victims of damaging acts have a duty to mitigate damages and to keep them as low as possible. In addition, it dictates that damages are not recoverable for losses that the injured party could have avoided without undue risk, burden or humiliation. It is the excess costs borne by the seller or the buyer that are normally recoverable in a damage case.
Many different events can cause damages to a business.
This is a common damage premise. The valuator computes the expected value of the enterprise as if the defendant and the plaintiff had never interacted and subtracts the actual value of the enterprise. By using this premise, you are arguing that if the plaintiff had not relied on the defendant, he or she would not have lost the amount being claimed. No matter what type of event caused the damages, the methods used to calculate claim are fairly standard. These are compared with results during the period when the alleged acts were affecting the business.