This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. 94-651 Robert Russell, et al. Supreme Court On Appeal from v. J. and Levitt, Dist.
Plaintiffs make three claims on appeal.
In claim I plaintiffs seek specific performance of an alleged contract to sell the park, claiming that the trial court erred in concluding that no contract existed. Plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in concluding that defendants' conduct did not constitute consumer fraud. In claim III plaintiff Russell, in a separate cause of action, argues that defendants committed an unfair business practice when they agreed to lease a lot to him only on the condition that he buy a mobile home from them. He contends that the trial court erred in dismissing his claim. Plaintiffs are current or former tenants of the Park, which contains 250 lots leased as sites for mobile homes.