One center study reviewed thousands of wildlife violation cases, and the overwhelming majority resulted in fines and probation versus jail. That's not completely surprising. Judges oversee cases of murder, rape, and arson, and along comes someone accused of shooting a black bear out of season. Musgrave notes that federal courts have begun issuing higher fines, and jail is a greater possibility. Yet, as Santel points out, an increased focus on incarceration presents its own difficulties.
People are more willing to admit guilt when a fine is the punishment.
But a chance at significant imprisonment will probably mean fewer plea bargains, more cases in the system, and increased costs to taxpayers. Although jail is not likely, the fines for breaking wildlife laws can be significant. He notes that in Colorado, fines for such offenses are mandatory. States like Wisconsin and Minnesota also add to the financial burden by confiscating vehicles, firearms, and fishing equipment used in violations. They typically earn more through their illegal activities than they will ever have to pay in fines.