Very likely not. But not so very long ago, we did just that. Marriage has been an economic alliance for most of our human past. It was a means to provide a division of labor that would guarantee the survival of the next generation. Even such love that did emerge could hardly be called romantic, in our understanding of the term.
Romance is a recent historical invention.
Or King Mark and Isolde, who falls for Tristan. Sex, after all was about reproduction. Romance was the joining of two human souls, not their bodies. But later, as we began to separate sex from reproduction, and as the economic system permitted middle class morality to create its own new forms, we began to get the idea that it might well be possible to conjoin marriage, sexual love and romance in the same package. It was through this demand from the middle classes that we accepted the principle of marrying for love, not for the convenience of parents, or the exigencies of family alliances.