So far as I've been able to learn, the only newspaper regularly covering the Peace Bridge story that did not get invited to the meeting was Artvoice. I was doing research in the Peace Bridge office three of the four mornings before the meeting, and they faxed us a press release immediately after the meeting, so it wasn't that they didn't know how to reach us.
Parsons is a huge corporation.
He also said there were unresolved environmental concerns, like what a signature span would do to bird migration patterns and the status of the bridge as an historical structure. It must have been a real performance. I assume there were charts, perhaps slides. I don't know because, as I said, Artvoice wasn't invited to the dance. I do know that Lamb had no evidence for any of his major assertions, and that his firm elected not to look at a good deal of evidence readily available to them.