Moreover, even if such relief had been specifically requested, monitoring Looney to insure his compliance with the particular portion of the FHO at issue here, relating to the display of signs, should not prove very difficult and probably will not involve more than de minimis expense. Accordingly, the Commission does not find that a compensatory award to monitor future conduct is necessary in this particular case. This form of relief may be ordered by the Commission. Accordingly, the Commission orders that Looney attend a training session provided by MTO, on or before August 1, 1997. MTO next seeks an award of punitive damages.
Punitive damages are appropriate here.
Looney committed a clear violation of the FHO and then ignored the Commission's process in its entirety. Punitive damages may be awarded for a combination of a substantive violation and refusal to participate in our proceedings. Accordingly, the Commisison orders Looney to pay MTO's reasonable attorney's fees to be determined as set forth below. Pursuant to Regulation 240.630, Complainant shall serve the Hearing Officer and all other parties a statement of attorney's fees and costs supported by arguments and affidavits no later than 24 days after the mailing of this Order. This statement shall also be filed with the Commission.