Furthermore, any debate on nature and science should really leave out any arguments involving God. Cloning of transgenic animals can not only save human lives by providing the badly needed organs for transplant, it can also be used to save other animals. Also, cloning in general can protect endangered species from extinction. Their reasoning has been widely substantiated by science. Both the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the American Dietetic Association have endorsed vegetarian diets.
Meat is also an extremely low yield product.
In the U.S., animals are fed more than 80 percent of the corn grown and more than 95 percent of the oats. Vegetarianism is also environmentally more sound. Whether it's water use or pollution, soil use or erosion, resource use or air pollution, raising animals for food is a prime contributor to the problem. The point to all of this information on logical vegetarianism is that farming and killing animals for their meat is not at all necessary and is done despite the existence of a better alternative. Therefore the answer to the question of whether the two are the same is absolutely not.