One day after visiting his hospital the doctor decided to take a look at the student disorders, which were much spoken of in those days. Doctor Fischhof had to make an improvised speech, in which he urged to demand the freedom of press and religion and institution of truly people's election. It is quite probable that until that moment the doctor adhered to liberal views. But it happened so that he just started uttering radical slogans, which the crowd wanted to hear from him. Thus, participants of the meeting and the speaker inspired each other in strict accordance with the laws of psychology of the masses deduced by G.Le Bon, G.Tarde, S.Freud, S.Moscovici and other authoritative social psychologists.
Philistines present themselves a great material for fanatic crowds.
The equality of moral and intellectual standards makes it easy for philistines to find a common language and unite. Crowds are nothing new. There always were crowds but the time of their domination came in the end of the 19th and 20th century when the living conditions of philistines were unified by mass production and consumption. It terminated in the century of the masses. As for liberal democracy, it started dying in the end of the century.