If the committee determined effective percentages which they feel could accurately depict these workplace-injuries , then the same standard could be applied effectively to both small and large business. Further I feel that these regulations could be applied in ways which would help both worker's health and businesses success improve in the future. In order for California OSHA to have an effective measure, they must first clearly define the problem, and then write regulations which will push companies to make changes for the better. It is inevitable that if the committee can't even properly define the disorder, that there will be misinterpretations. The members must define cumulative trauma disorders so that employees will be able to notice them.
Next litigation needs to be mandated to promote changes for the better.
He summarizes that most regulations deter innovation and simply promote opposition. Therefore regulations need to be made which will give companies the chance to improve and meet specific goals in the future. This encourages innovation and ingenuity. The ergonomics regulation needs to be set at high standards for the future. This will encourage companies to make the changes which will help them and their workers.