Afterimages are an example. It would be very difficult to determine whether animals have afterimages. If they do, it is likely that they would pay no attention to them. There is another class of experiences which are not subjective or private, are similar to perceptions, but are nevertheless false. Such virtual objects are presumably falsely perceived by all seeing observers, animal or human.
Pictures are another example.
The straight stick which appears bent when partially immersed in water is similar to cases of the latter class. But this is true only so long as the stick is not moved . The moral of all this is that invariant detection over time is a useful dimension of sensitivity and that the perceptual system will tend to develop such kinds of sensitivity. But, along with these, there will inevitably be useless dimensions of sensitivity that are merely incidental to the useful ones. Euclidean and Platonic forms are wonderful inventions for teaching mathematics but they have caused hopeless confusion in the problem of understanding visual perception.