The Ombudsman's findings and reports are final. Because the Ombudsman may not issue an binding order, no one may take the Ombudsman to court to appeal the findings or seek a review or modification of the findings and reports. This ensures that office resources are not diverted to litigation. Courts may only review whether the Ombudsman has jurisdiction over an agency. The Ombudsman may not make binding orders.
Ombudsmen have extensive powers to inquire and investigate agency acts.
This limitation on Ombudsman powers, seen by some as a weakness, is seen by most Ombudsmen as a strength for two reasons. First, government agencies persuaded to act are more likely to act effectively and efficiently and do a better job than those forced to act. Second, binding orders would establish appeal rights. That would subject the office to litigation and the need to spend financial resources on defending against actions in court.