We have not received an acceptable proposal with the exception of one message during an interview. We believe that a proposal for some form of serious cooperation presupposes the definition of what is wanted in a particular municipality, and whether what is planned corresponds with our projections for that municipality. We do not want to enter into officials' coalitions, as was the case with Unity, where the basic motive is the division of official positions. We will enter into coalitions where there is agreement on the program of development for municipalities and people who can guarantee that that program can be realized. It is surprising but our membership, and our municipal boards, who will have the greatest responsibility for policy-making in each municipality, show a great dose of patience and an extremely small degree of ambition to get into an official position at any price.
People are far more oriented toward some future events.
We don't want to repeat the mistake of those parties who served as ornaments of the larger parties. We would lose our identity in this way. I have the impression that you are extremely suspicious toward the ruling coalition. Based on the information which we are receiving from the municipalities, the problem faced by our people is that a number of those who belong to the ruling coalition do not enjoy any authority in their local settings. Our people do not want to lose their own legitimacy by associating with them because they believe that there have been many instances of misuse of authority and positions.