First, graduate or specialty programs with low enrollments are probably most vulnerable to elimination. Second, basic programs in the arts and sciences at the undergraduate level are probably the least vulnerable, though there are no guarantees. I would strongly encourage each department that has low enrollment programs to think about whether enrollment can be increased and whether the program can be maintained in its current form. It is clear that, within the North Carolina system, we will need to focus on building and maintaining quality programs that can be productive in terms of students graduated. Again, you should be aware that this is not an unusual situation.
Most states have some form of program review occurring on a regular basis.
In North Carolina, where a high percentage of the total university budget is paid by taxpayers through legislative appropriation, there is no reason to believe that the interest in eliminating programs that are not productive will dissipate. Enrollment Issues associated with program review and our current situation with funded enrollment has caused me to reflect on how these issues are tied together. You should be aware that WCU's enrollment has not changed significantly in 20 years despite the fact that the population of the state is continuing to grow. At the same time, virtually every other UNC institution has grown. And, while none of us are looking for unbridled growth, we need to build appropriate enrollment.