Nader supporters in the swing states could add their names to the same web site, stating that, as Nader supporters in a tossup state, they have decided to vote for Gore in the explicit hope that Gore voters in Republican states will correspondingly cast their ballots for Nader. There is some meat to these tradings, with pollsters suggesting a voter shift from Nader to Gore could turn the election results. This rapidly led to contentions that Republican Secretary of State Bill Jones cracked down on the discussion of voting strategies because of his political stance, and, interestingly, claims that scam sites that don't allow swapping, but merely trick voters have also sprung up. ACLU attorneys say the law is not applicable, or, if construed to be applicable, that it is not Constitutionally sound. It seems the question turns on, funnily enough, the actual value of a vote.
Most state laws prohibit the exchange of votes for something of value.
It can't be sold on any market, or redeemed at the local bank.