The comparison between interviews and e.mails gave me some instructive perspectives. We obviously hear very little about these matters because for a real man it would be even worse to complain about or feel inadequate because of something like this. The taboos regarding male circumcision and foreskin conditions are more successful than a censorship law. To demonstrate this consider the lack of clarity which exists in the terminology. Naming a thing is a clear sign of cultural recognition.
Medical attention is concentrated on infections in the genital area.
BXO and balanitis, which are used to refer to the same infection. This taboo is plainly obvious by its absence in specialised books. Very often literature on male sexuality and parent care either ignore the subject or simply condemn circumcision. Any explanations relating to all conditions are fully inadequate for parents or any individual who has them. I have never come across an accurate method for parents to check for these conditions.