But these questions follow on from an acceptance of the visual object. In my case, there was no visual object offered for review, but an essay as ipso facto. And the visualization was up to the reader. The response could also be believed as nervous breakdown characteristic of contemporary people who have lost faith in any offered commodity, nor in art claimed to be, neither in social institution. The connection of image with effective action on viewers is disturbed.
People seem to prefer a legend.
The formalistic presentation can no longer explain life in our rapidly changing world. To the opposite of a true conceptual art which was a violent reaction against modernist notions of progress, this new action was populist and not against an art object status, but for creation of an aura of legend and good reception. This action thus is purely aesthetic without discrimination of the recipients. I have received responses ranging from teen-agers to retired journalists. The romantic, poetic message reached throughout the cyber space with little effort in professionalism of presentation, but with a strong power of personal correspondence.