This can be dangerous, but I think that should be our theological challenge, as we use the inferior models as stepping-stones. The Buberian model, therefore, would require that we work to understand our interpersonal relationships in transcendent terms, not vice verse. Here's where the problem lies. Granted, that's all the overwhelming majority of American Reform Jews understand or think about, but the simple fact is that's not all there is. The original Hebrew has definite gender biases which virtually no one in the Reform movement has cared to address.
Most people are content to change the English.
Although I don't yet think in Hebrew, I intend to some day soon, and I would want as many Jews as possible to anyway. As long as the androcentric terminology remains in the Hebrew, we have a problem. This is a noble ideal, but we must realize that we have already departed significantly from the traditional liturgy. Yes, this could be radical, but perhaps it's precisely the radicalism our movement needs. The second obvious problem is in the Hebrew language itself, which is much more gender-focused.