It is readily accepted that brethren now and in the past have differed on what is taught in Genesis 1. It is our place to accept that passage, not to place it side by side with three other theories which deny its literal truth. The problem with such an attitude can be seen when taken to its ultimate end. A few examples will suffice. Various theories are espoused on the subject of Marriage, Divorce and Remarriage.
Many theories abound regarding eschatology.
Premillinial thought is endemic to denominationalism. How about an issue that addresses the salvation of any soul. There are several positions regarding the necessity of baptism in securing the salvation of man. Others disagree on the method of baptism, some advocating a substitution of sprinkling or pouring for immersion. It is assailed by human sophistry, and is sometimes misunderstood, but the perception is not the reality.