Let's use properly the time that is left, and we'll see what happens in the future, as far as SFOR is concerned, after 1998. The important thing is, I've said, to really get to work in the time which is left. We'll see later what decision is taken. The United States and Great Britain, by the actions of their troops here, have certainly seemed to have put their stamp of approval on President Plavsic's campaign against the leadership in Pale. I'm curious whether there is a consensus among NATO members that Madame Plavsic should be defended as the legitimate President in Srpska, and that if necessary force can be used to protect her forces, or forces deemed to be legitimate.
Nobody has a doubt about that.
Let me put it this way. NATO and SFOR has been suggested by some to be taking sides. Others may get out of that path, of that way. We are not taking sides. Others may be taking sides against the path that we have defined as a good path, which is the path of Dayton, by the way, signed by all the parties.