Let us make this point clearer by addressing a principle of moral philosophy. This way of interpreting reality is misleading and can cause someone to misunderstand it, because in everything there is some goodness. In the example of robbery, it is true that there is some goodness in having more money and everyone knows that there is the possibility of having more money, after a successful robbery. In the same way, it is true that there is the possibility that a woman can die due to an illegal abortion. The reader should be reminded that, with a universal agreement, no act is more unjust than the murder of the innocent.
Nothing can justify it .
At this point, the whole fallacy of the argument made by pro-choice supporters is clear. T he main inference about the legalization of abortion cannot be whether or not some women will die due to illegal abortions, but whether abortion is a crime and whether it is in contradiction to justice. If abortion is not a crime or is not in contradiction to justice , one has to conclude that forbidding it is ridiculous. The objections of the pro-life supporters, then, would make no difference. On the other hand, if abortion is a crime and it transgresses justice, one has to conclude that it is ridiculous to legalize it for the sole reason that only some women may die due to an illegal one.