Every improvement in observational astronomy has revealed that the spatial and temporal distribution of galaxies is indicative of an infinite non-expanding universe. This would be the parsimonious thing to do. Even Edwin Hubble was of the conclusion that All of these data lead to the very simple conception of a sensibly infinite, homogeneous universe of which the observable region is an insignificant sample. Furthermore, the 2.7K background radiation is no longer useful as a claim in support of the Big Bang since it has been shown that an infinite non-expanding universe would also have this radiation. In fact a recent paper shows that there were researchers who utilized measurements and or theoretical calculations that better predicted the 2.7K microwave temperature prior to Penzias and Wilson, and they did this without utilizing the Big Bang expanding universe hypothesis.
Nature is sensible.
But one has to realize that people can be creative to the point of absurdity. Our biases are often the problem. An example that everyone can agree with is of astronomers of many centuries ago. It is my belief that study, logic, and skepticism will reveal either a sensible world or non-sensible people. This paper covers very well the absurd ad hoc constructions that have been the norm of standard particle physics and cosmology over the past three decades.