This is a question of fact, not notation, that I am raising here, and I don't know the answer. I'll get back to that below. So we're dealing with unconscious stylistic effects, in my view. Yeah, of course. That's just what they do.
Processes are essentially speech impediments.
To the extent that this is reasonable, anything contradicting it seems to me totally unreasonable. The quote has so much hedging, I wonder if its evidence is distinguishable from grasping at straws. This seems to presuppose a serious body of documented facts. I think I would understand the theory a lot better if examples had actually been effectively discussed. So I appreciate Rick's response, but I have tried to explain why I remain puzzled.