Background Research in forestry based on networks of participants is a frequently used means of combining the objectives of collaboration with a large number of partners, involvement over a large number of countries and the combination of a wide range of skills. For many organisations attempting to carry out research under the umbrella of multilateral collaboration, the assumption underpinning research networks is that collaboration provides a cost-effective means of achieving objectives. However, assessment of the validity of this assumption has been lacking with the result that many networks have been established and funded on inadequate justification. The implicit premise that networks are good has often been based on the tangible, yet unquantifiable, criterion of promotion of the profile of the organisation overseas. While this may be an important element in establishing the reputation of an organisation, it is too often a benefit that accrues to the donor agency rather than the recipient.
Research networks provide results for adoption by farmers.
This farm in Laos is using a provenance of Gliricidia sepium identified through an international research network involving scientists in over 30 countries.