I understand the decision to hold up on HR reengineering was the lack of promotion opportunities in the concept. It was basically promotion- less . The reengeeering proposal literally did not have promotions in the system. You would never be promoted again. That aspect was very troubling to me.
Promotions are part of our culture, fundamentally ingrained as a way to recognize and reward.
It s central to how we manage. The idea of putting promotions back in is not without controversy on its own. Somebody s making them too hard to do. There was also a feeling of lack of control. But the system should support, not impede.