It is the filmic evidence, or the production of it, that provides the scenario for much of the comedy in this film. Krippendorf uses a CP 16, a sync-sound camera that was a staple among journalists. The film takes place in the present, when video and digital technology and editing could have been used, instead of the 16mm film and a flatbed editor in the Krippendorf's basement on which they edit the footage. This was a conscious choice by the director, since in the book upon which this movie is based the anthropologist is using still photography. The video camera is still the tool of the tourist, or Krippendorf's son when he is in the backyard videotaping the burial of his hamster.
Real research requires reel film.
I mean, there is a tactile nature to editing film, cutting and splicing film is more emotionally appealing to me personally, and I hoped that it would generate an emotional response in the audience to the process of filmmaking. Most anthropologists are aware of the discipline's need to better disseminate information to the general public. Another example where one can address anthropological issues is when Prof. Krippendorf seduces his assistant. I feel obliged to clarify for the viewer that the material presented tonight, offensive as it may be for some and inappropriate as it may be for children, is offered as scientific research. She grew up in New Guinea.