He certainly indicates at times that people have rights which majorities cannot overrule. Nor does he restrict his majoritarian rule to instances of property damage. In one paragraph, he says it's wrong for the governments of Seattle or the U.S. to ban demonstrations and prevent people from exercising their rights. And then he builds his case against trashing on the premise that it's wrong to exercise your rights if most people don't think you should. Well, most people in the Seattle demonstrations wore clothes.
Most people are straight.
Mainstream America is uncomfortable with open homosexuality. Mainstream America eats meat. No doubt nudity and cunnilingus served to alienate at least as many people as trashing. No doubt Albert wishes they also had stayed home. No doubt the lunch counter sit-ins upset a lot of people who were sympathetic to Civil Rights as long as blacks behaved themselves and asked politely for freedom You can see what this kind of thinking will end in.