Number two, if you look at the outside advisers, the best mainstream economists, both Democrats and Republicans, they were very critical about some of the assumptions that came out of that CBO study. So you cannot say that that study was determinative. David Wyss's DRI study was, and if you're saying that because we worked with David Wyss in the study, this is a consulting firm that's referred to by the Federal Reserve, the CBO and others, if you're attacking the credibility of that study, I would suggest you attack the substance of the study, as opposed to the comment you made. There was a much larger cut two years ago. I think it's hard to say.
More people sell stocks to take advantage of the lower rates, and so that's going to happen.
What will the result be after 10 years, and that's what I was referring to the results in the CBO study. Iris is so right. I mean, these things are difficult to estimate. What the government does when it estimates the revenue impact, they look at the static losses if you tax something at a lower rate, you get less of it. You gain more revenue because people will sell stock at a lower rate.