If no one, not even PACs, can buy elections, then maybe we'll see some real democracy in this country. In unregulated elections we got Washington, Lincoln, and Eisenhower. With spending limits, we got Carter and Dukakis. Window fears that the reform will make elections less fair. PACs are nothing but private citizens like you and me who get together to support what they believe in.
Private citizens have a voice in government already.
It's called a vote, and I'm not surprised that Storm seems not to have heard of it. Another long-awaited reform may become law, as Congress voted to impose voluntary spending limits on candidates for Federal office. These discounts will be underwritten, ultimately, by the taxpayer. The Supreme Court has already ruled that you can't tell a candidate how much he can spend. Shorter Congress recommended that the duration of the campaign cycle be shortened, so that primaries, nominating conventions and elections take place within as little as five months.