Respondent further argues that if the information was unavailable, the Petitioner had a duty under the 60-Day Rule to provide the data when it did become available at a later date. Respondent admits that there is no such language contained in Minn. Stat. 278. 05, subd. The Court did not set a deadline for the provision of updated data. Petitioner, in this case, notified the Respondent within the 60 days, that the 1998 income and expense figures and the 1999 anticipated income and expense figures were unavailable.
Petitioner intends to produce the data and is ready to respond to the discovery request.
The 60-Day Rule does not supplant the discovery process after the 60 days have elapsed. It was intended to be an expediting aid to discovery. Once the requirements of the 60-Day Rule are met, the normal rules of discovery take over. The remaining data was provided. There is therefore, no basis for dismissal.