In the so-called complaint served on me, there were no words addressing that issue. Robyn apparently attributes that loss to my website. Hence, the complaint in your court. Any proper complaint against me by her should be in a court where there are public hearings, not closed sessions. The fight is between myself and Robyn, not between the child and me.
Publicity prevents abuses of a single judge's power.
We adopted this requirement of a showing of overriding necessity, in part, because of the great public interest in disclosure of all information relevant to misuse of authority and official wrongdoing. George W. Prescott Pub. Co. v. Stoughton Div. of Dist. Thus, on the facts here, there being no lawful basis to prohibit me from putting public records on my website or to prohibit me from exercising my First Amendment rights, I can rest on the statement that I did not publish any material or quote any sentences or parts thereof which I know to be privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected. It would be, of course, very helpful to both her client Robyn and me if Deborah Wolf would advocate her client's claim in a clear, concise, and simple manner without overstating details and losing the forest for the trees.