Philosophia , as this tradition may be called, draws its heritage from Greece, and has inspired scholarship throughout the ages. However, the ideal of objectivity, which has come to define the standard for this tradition, has had unfortunate results. The human encounter with transcendence, which overwhelms all existence, has been considered as no more than a peculiarity of the huma n alone, to be categorized and separated from other aspects of life. The result is a dehumanized view of truth, which all too often evokes fundamentalist reactions. Smith concludes with a call to rediscover the dimension of transcendence.
Objectivity means more than reducing the human to the calculable.
To treat people as they are in themselves is to understand them as subjects, to treat all aspects of their existence as worthy of respect and study, and to grasp what it means to be captured by a reality that overwhel ms the confines of our limited world. The author raises fundamental questions about the nature of knowledge and the act of knowing in order to scrutinize the way members of academic disciplines conduct themselves. Rather than allowing the intellectual questions to remain abstract, they are used to evaluate the practices of the Academy. Smith raises a loud and insistent voice in his demand that we take personal responsibility for what we count as truth and for how we deploy it. Voices are being raised in other places as well that demand that we look at the personal relationship between ourselves and what we know.