However, if they are rather pompous about their superiority in relation to other students, it would be best to judge them by an ideal standard. This strategy might spur them to improve at a faster pace. This needs to be borne in mind by all working for the institutionalisation of human rights in the country. Common sense becomes most uncommon in such a situation. Vested interests and human rights come into conflict.
Populism becomes the policy.
As such, there is always a danger that the commission may compromise its independence, take sides to gratify political masters, make human rights discourse cheap or dilute its charter or even inspire false hopes. In a country where even the political parties cherish the costly dream that law courts should decide a case by satisfying everyone in the government and opposition, such a doubt is not unfounded. It is important that the composition of the board should not be made a controversial issue as it would only weaken the newly constituted body. Moreover, the team has been selected on the basis of a political as well as a professional consensus. Nevertheless, it looks at odds with the traditions established by our predecessors around the world that the commission must have an ethnic balance.