Open peer review is feasible and does not reduce quality of reviews Arguments in favour of asking reviewers to sign their reviews include increased accountability, fairness, and transparency.
Preliminary research suggests that open peer review leads to better quality reviews.
There were no differences in the quality of reviews between those who were randomised to be identified and those who were not. Most reviewers agreed to be identified, and most of the authors surveyed believed that reviewers should sign their reviews. You can read the full text of this editorial article in the British Medical Journal Website . SLPI promotes healing of abnormal skin wounds. Scientists have discovered that a multipurpose protein found in several bodily fluids can promote the healing of abnormal skin wounds, which are a significant problem in the elderly.