Fortunately I do not count myself a creative artist, preferring to think of myself as an engineer. Secondly I count myself fortunate in remaining 'stylistically nameless'. This 'namelessness' seems to please the Critics. It is necessary, in any taxonomy, to have some specimens that refuse classification. It goes with the suspicion that 'evolution' is associated with these 'sports'.
Nothing is as constant as changes in Fashion.
Ours is not the first economy to have induced fashion- obsolescence to compensate for the fact that things last a long time. Fashion is also powered by the 'Oedipal Drive'. One way to open a space for a new generation is to displace the older generation by a radical change of fashion. I, personally, have passed through more than one 'fashion-cycle'. Today, with the revival of everything 'Fifties', I make Rip van Winkle look like a fashion victim.