Thus does my model incorporate formistic thought. Psychological elements are definitely included, for the physiological sensations of art media play excitatory and therefore sensuous roles for the aesthetic experience. Of course the model is highly organistic in nature, for it states that larger entities, like art appreciation or aesthetic experience, are the accumulation of other multi-level relationships of the human mind. I call it Transformative Philosophy. That's the fancy term that stands for a view of the world as one characterized by constant evolution through adaptive or maladaptive change, which at the same time, maintains a constant relativity of all phenomena and things.
Reality is relative, and so are facts.
Evidence cannot pinpoint an ultimate reality but only support present or emerging hypotheses of these changing relationships of specific things tied to a high order of permanent unity. The wholeness of the universe is expressed as the final answer to personal conflict and aesthetic value. It is my duty to discern how all these different fields of study have interconnections that can be expressed aesthetically as a method of proving their existence.