Below are links to some of the sites where full text of the decision is available. The government has appealed the lower court injunction to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case. Hopefully, this nonsense will soon be over once and for all. But the bottom line is that the First Amendment should not be interpreted to require us to entrust the protection it affords to the judgment of prosecutors.
Prosecutors come and go.
Even federal judges are limited to life tenure. The First Amendment remains to give protection to future generations as well. This is exactly the benefit of Internet communication, however. The Government, therefore, implicitly asks this court to limit both the amount of speech on the Internet and the availability of that speech. This argument is profoundly repugnant to First Amendment principles.