4F. I would prefer to receive Crop Science in an electronic format instead of a printed copy. Need to offer both formats. As a reader I am satisfied with the quality of Crop Science. Most are happy. 4I. Crop Science editors are generally fair and constructive in their criticism of manuscripts.
Most members agree, there are few that disagree.
The use of ad hoc reviews in evaluating manuscripts for publication is beneficial to the process. 4K. Anonymous reviews are preferable to those in which the reviewers' identities are made known to the authors. I would favor online submission and review of papers if it would decrease the processing time. 4N. Online tracking and editing of manuscripts would improve the publication process. It is a good idea, and would be an improvement.