Adam testified he was not bothered by a resultant scar or his physical appearance. Adam further testified that after he received his new tooth, the mouth injury no longer affected his social life. Prior to trial, the claims against Geifman Food Stores, Inc. were settled. However, the jury awarded zero dollars for disfigurement and disability and found Adam 25 percent comparatively negligent. Plaintiffs' post trial was denied.
Plaintiffs now appeal.
Plaintiff contends such a discrepancy warrants a new trial on damages. Plaintiffs next argue the finding of contributory negligence is not supported by the record. We disagree with both contentions. 144 Ill. App. 268 Ill. App.