Appellant supplied Gonzales with a pistol taken from her father's belongings. Gonzales entered the bedroom and shot both of appellant's parents, killing Mrs. Caldwell and wounding Mr. Caldwell. Mr. Caldwell testified to some of the events at appellant's trial. In points of error fourteen and fifteen, appellant claims she was denied due process and due course of law under the federal and state constitutions. In point fifteen, appellant again fails to separate her state constitutional claim by providing substantive argument as to why the state constitution should be interpreted differently from the federal constitution.
Nothing is presented for review by point of error fifteen.
She was subsequently tried for that offense and received a life sentence. During the trial of that case, a witness who had previously lied came forward with information that appellant and Gonzales planned and executed the murder of Mrs. Caldwell. Subsequently, the State commenced a new certification proceeding in the juvenile court and obtained a certification order therein for appellant to stand trial for the instant offense, i.e., capital murder. In point fourteen, appellant essentially argues that the district court that tried her as an adult did not have jurisdiction to try her for capital murder because the juvenile court only entered a transfer order for the offense of solicitation to commit capital murder. The court of criminal appeals ultimately held that a transfer order certifying a juvenile as an adult must relate to a specific criminal incident or specific acts constituting a crime.