You can accept it or you can fight it. If you accept it, there is no conflict. If you decide to fight it, you can either manage the wildlife or manage the habitat. Usually, managing the wildlife means excluding or some combination of trapping, relocating, or killing. Trapping is not the first choice for a number of reasons.
Rabies now makes trapping a potential hazard for the trapper.
Also, trapping and relocating may not really be having a heart, because many species when relocated have a poor chance of survival. Perhaps the most powerful reason for choosing to manage the habitat rather than the wildlife is that, if the habitat is good for a species, when you remove an individual animal, another individual will move in. I have never liked the feeling of butting my head against the metaphorical brick wall, so I am slow to decide there is a conflict. When I do, I work to manage the habitat to limit the damage or annoyance. The first step is to read up on the natural history of the animal.