This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Linda Levitt, J. Michael Rose, St. Albans, for Appellant-Mother. William H. Sorrell, Attorney General, and Barbara Crippen, Assistant Attorney General, Montpelier, for Appellee. See 33 V.S.A. 5532, 5540.
Mother claims that the court erred in finding a substantial change of material circumstances.
Father claims that the court erred in concluding that termination of his residual parental rights was in the best interests of the children. L., and Ch. L., ages twelve, ten, and nine respectively. D.C. is the biological child of mother. The biological father of D.C. has relinquished his parental rights and is not part of this appeal.