In reality, God has all possibilities and is the offerer of such of them as are perfectly appropriate in relation to the circumstances in which experiences arise. What I am referring to is an uncritical acceptance of what some mystics proclaim without consciously pausing to engage in philosophical reflection on their experiences. I thoroughly admire mysticism, and I believe that we should take its evidence most seriously. Being psychologically certain of God as identical with the world is no better philosophically than being psychologically certain that a straight rod sticking out of water is bent. This includes any feeling, thinking, willing, striving, desiring, anything constituting sentience in any degree of complexity.
Natural laws are simply descriptions of how the many entities constituting nature act.
An active law is something of a mythical personification of observed regularities, believed in not only by many New Thoughters, but by many others. Moreover, this theory assumes that God responds to the same entity that submitted an order that God fills. While this may be practically unimportant, it is a metaphysically and ethically significant problem not found in the direct co-creative process described by process philosophy. There is also here an unwarranted assumption that God can provide a completed product. This runs afoul of the process understanding that in co-creation God can offer only the plan, the needed possibilities.