Combine that with the administration's claims that the Bush had not backed out on a campaign promise and the public is left in total confusion. We live in an age of technology that makes it quite simple for the average citizen to look up the facts and confirm the truth. Unlike Gore, Bush had little to say on the subject. Here's what I found. Complex and contentious issues like global warming call for a far more realistic approach than that of the Kyoto Conference.
More research is needed to understand both the cause and the impact of global warming.
That is why the Kyoto treaty was repudiated in a lopsided, bipartisan Senate vote. A Republican president will work with businesses and with other nations to reduce harmful emissions through new technologies without compromising America's sovereignty or competitiveness - and without forcing Americans to walk to work. This platform gives two impressions. Whatever the theories on global warming a treaty that does not include China and exempts 'developing' countries from necessary standards while penalizing American industry is not in the national interest. The rest of the statement confers the notion that the Kyoto agreement is bad for corporations.