And he blatantly ignores the fact that nothing can properly illustrate God's nature so as to stand without a departure in some aspect from the reality of God's existence. Yet he calmly uses this very flawed arguing method, himself, to say that Oneness is False. Suppose the Oneness person denies the applicability of logic to God. It is most logical to observe the Old Testament writings and notice the outright monotheistic statements made and then observe New Testament writings with such Old Testament statements in mind, only to conclude that the mention of Father, Son and Holy Ghost must be modes of the One God of the Old Testament. To stray from safety and imagine some sort of eternal trio of persons when reading of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost is surely folly.
Nothing comes close to the term three eternal persons .
And there is not a single note of description added to the three titles as being three persons when they are mentioned in New Testament scripture. And this is what Trinitarianism inadvertently implies. All Israelites of Old Testament writings were staunchly Monotheistic in a belief in Absolutely One God. If Trinitarianism were true, God simply ignored the fact that His separated people so severely misunderstood His nature. It would be God's fault to see modern Jews reject Trinity due to their staunch monotheism.