Defendants have deliberately flouted the law, and have deprived plaintiffs of rights, privileges, and immunities protected and secured by the constitution and laws of the United States. B. Unnecessarily and unreasonably prohibiting plaintiffs from fishing in certain designated areas when there are harvestable fish present. C. Unnecessarily and unreasonably restricting the amount of time plaintiffs are allowed to fish when there are harvestable fish present. So severely restricting plaintiffs' fishing time, without justification, as to unnecessarily and unreasonably trammel plaintiffs' right to take a fair share of available harvestable salmon. This trammeling of significant personal and property fights has caused substantial personal damage to each plaintiff.
Plaintiffs incorporate the above allegations by reference as though expressly rewrirten herein.
The Washington State Constitution, article 1, section 12, prohibits special privileges and immunities. B. Affording tribal fishermen preferential treatment in that their fishing activity is monitored and scrutinized far less than is the fishing activity of nontribal fishermen such as plaintiffs. The dual management of the fishery whereby tribal fishermen and defendants promulgate rules and regulations governing the fishery, affords preferential treatment to tribal fishermen because nontribal fishermen such as plaintiffs are unable to participate in the formulation of the rules and regulations. Nontribal fishermen are frequently not even allowed to observe dual management meetings. D. Tribal fishermen are frequently permitted to fish in certain areas or zones that have historically produced substantial quantities of fish while plaintiffs are prohibited from fishing in these areas.