It's like a Band-Aid versus stitches. The other side complains about any decision that is made and whoever is in control winds up with one big mess, while the only ones who suffer in the end are the kids and hard-working teachers. To me, the hair-raising reality seems to be that in order to get an efficient and quality system, we need freedom of choice. We need a complete shave. If we are to have national socialism we might as well use it as intended-governance for the benefit of industrial capital.
Market growth is most beneficial but currently corporate welfare is indiscriminate.
Instead, we should take all current market subsidies and a large portion of our military budget and invest it directly in subsidizing consumption to keep our markets expanding. The poor and unemployed historically spend the highest percentage of their income on consumer purchases. The military industrial complex is not, if ever it was, a sustainable or necessary part of the social compact. The consumer is the engine of our socioeconomic world. People on welfare should be forced to maintain working cars and household appliances.