Regardless of which of these stages each of us may be in, we all live in a society where we are going to encounter the other points of view. Ideally, this would be educational, like someone who had seen the movie but not the critique encountering someone who had read the critique but never seen the movie. They might get together, watch the show, read the article, and talk about it. Sadly, these two viewpoints are both widespread and influential. Their prevalence puts the advocate of postscientific religion in an awkward position, sometimes defending the validity of science against reactionary religion, other times defending the value of religion against defensive science.
Most churches are havens for prescientific and reactionary views of religion.
The academic and media cultures are havens for scientific and defensive scientific views of religion. I'd love to see my church, and eventually the whole culture, embrace a postscientific view of religion. But, for a while at least, we'll probably be living with people in all different stages and postures, not able to communicate well most of the time.