The Occupational Health and Safety Administration believes that the rules will be cost-effective, reducing for example strains and sprains, lower back pain, carpal tunnel syndrome and hernias by 32,000 to 95,000 injuries each year. Employers would have to fix 4.5 million jobs in the first year and fewer thereafter. Critics include business groups who say the rules are too expensive relative to the benefits. While the House delayed the rules pending further research, the Senate did not act, so the President is free to act. Employers argue that the cost of the rules will be high.
Opportunity costs comprise direct and indirect costs.
Workers in jobs susceptible to repetitive strain injuries are likely to see benefits. Business groups successfully convinced the House to delay the introduction of the rules. Refer to the distribution of the costs and benefits and the ability of different groups to mount opposition or show support. Examine the case for and against.