I think the question of what should be discerned and what should not be discerned should be framed in the larger category of Christian freedom. The Bible seems to say that some Christians are stronger and therefore can participate in activites that would bother the consciences of weaker Christians. It is the responsiblity of the strong to withhold their exercise of freedom for the sake of the weak. Perhaps there are strong Christians at Calvin College who can engage in discernment about a story which, depending upon interpretation, shows Christ sinning. Perhaps also there are weaker Christians who, like myself, find the story repulsive and are deeply angered by such a portrayal of Christ.
Nothing happens in a vacuum.
The context of how the story was distributed was in violation of Christian Freedom. Not all Christians are strong, but all Christians are called to support the weak. Had the story been discussed in the proper setting, amongst strong Christians, then I have no objection, but to throw the story out there is at the least irresponsible and at the most a cause for someone to stumble. Perhaps the reason we have lost our distinctiveness as a school is that many of the students here have not read and are not required to read Calvin or Kuyper to any extent. I was highly amused to see Brian Peltzer claim that after passing CPOL, he needn't discern anymore or listen to Ken Heffner.