Well, it seems that in some cases the product won't launch under Windows 95. There are good and responsible managers out there who seek to understand the risks before shipping a product. Then there are the managers who instruct programmers to write the program without a specification, who ignore the importance of requirements reviews, and who squeeze all testing out of the schedule figuring that the customers will catch the issues in beta. To be fair, there are also testers who don't test and programmers who have high bug rates. Management isn't always at fault, but they are always responsible.
Responsibility comes with the job.
As currently written, Article 2B will encourage irresponsible practices in the software industry until quality hits bottom and the customers revolt. I believe that market forces will eventually force the software industry to improve quality, but only after the software industry has lost all its credibility. As a professional in the software industry, I don't want to see this happen. My reputation is on the line too. He explains the legal ramifications of this law quite clearly, and also what you can do about it.