It would seem simply human to at least try and answer a question if someone seems in need of an answer. It is as though psychoanalysts were people who had discovered something about answering that had both made them suspicious and enlightened them. There might be something else, but not an answer. The patient, that is to say, must learn to enjoy desiring without needing satisfaction. He must travel hopefully with no hope of arrival.
Psychoanalysis is a way of getting the answer no while being encouraged to clarify one's questions.
If they are more interested in answers than in the trouble with answers, their time and money will probably be better spent elsewhere. The philosopher and the psychoanalyst seek different satisfactions. The philosopher and the psychoanalyst agree that people ask, and ask for, what cannot be asked. For the psychoanalyst this is the point, for the philosopher this is the problem. What is not in question is the value of questions, and the value of asking questions about questions.