The problem is, today's corporations will not welcome this generation, and will throw up powerful resistance to them. Today's organizations are modeled after patriarchal organizations established centuries ago, when leadership was envisioned in a singular, Driver-driven, masculine, competitive, Machiavellian way. Intrigue and manipulation are built into the charters of these organizations. To expect companies like IBM or Chrysler-Daimler or Harvard University to lead the way in describing a new kind of leadership by team, is to ask these organizations to go against their own constitutions. They don't act like real teams because they are really parallel teams of one, each with their own constituents.
Real teams share roles and responsibilities.
Senior teams typically have parallel accountabilities. They never are able to prioritize goals since each member feels that his niche's goals are the most deserving. Oh, it is sad and hypocritical. While top management encourages teamwork among the rank and file, they have no clue about it themselves. They are constitutionally prohibited from engaging in it.