Local citizens and the Institute have detailed an alternative plan that would alleviate traffic congestion, save taxpayer money, preserve wetlands, and prevent further sprawl by re-designing existing roads. Northeast Michigan residents and the Institute oppose the damaging project, which is not warranted by traffic volume and would result in the single largest wetlands loss in Michigan. The state justifies the project with vague promises of economic growth. The agency released a draft environmental impact statement last winter, but has not yet chosen a preferred route. Concerned residents are promoting instead a far less costly new express route using existing roads.
Opponents counter that it is going to worsen congestion by encouraging sprawl and more driving.