Such a finding does not eliminate the problem, but it does suggest the need for a different solution. Sarewitz and Pielke recognize that the very mention of adaptation sends a chill down both sides of the climate change debate. To those who favor action to stop global warming, policies aimed at adaptation are tantamount to surrender. For those who see no threat, adaptation is unnecessary. Sarewitz and Pielke go on to say that such a constituency could form the basis of a revitalized international climate change policy focused on coordinating disaster relief, debt relief, and development assistance, and on generating and providing information on climate that participating countries could use in order to reduce their vulnerability.
Many links already exist.
The natural hazard mission provides a continuing stream of benefits and, simultaneously, builds a needed climate record. A presidential policy initiative that includes all of these components promises progress at a time when current approaches to addressing climate change are at a standstill. Applegate directs the American Geological Institute s Government Affairs Program and is editor of Geotimes. All rights reserved. Any copying, redistribution or retransmission of any of the contents of this service without the express written consent of the American Geological Institute is expressly prohibited.