The ultimate passivity of a permitted, experimentally controlled role makes it predictable. The election industry speculates about each way that each given choice is framed and then creates strategies for extracting maximum profits from each citizen's choice. With this automation of control, democratic regimes are now the most cost effective. This is part of today's intensification of democracy. Once ideology sees formal democracy in all acts of government, cost accounting demands that redundant local tyrants be removed.
Revolutionaries oppose every version of democratic ideology.
On one hand, after a revolution there won't be a need to fixate on the process of reaching each decision. For example, one person could decide a day's delivery schedule in a communal warehouse without oppressing the other workers. Other workers might prefer to spend their time walking on the beach than double checking each decision. The dispatcher would have no coercive power over the other participants in the warehouse. Deciding the schedule would not give her entrenched privilege that she could accumulate and exchanged for other things.