It is not a problem for print. You also want to be in physically interesting environments with video because you need something interesting for people to see. It is a curious requisite for doing an interesting story. Whereas in print you can find out what's interesting about a person and make them sound interesting. And if you are a good enough writer, you can create the scene that the camera couldn't pick up because of lighting and so forth.
Radio is much easier in terms of the logistical demands.
With TV, you have to lug equipment. Even in this day and age of smaller cameras, you are still in a situation where logistics are a large part of the enterprise. In TV, it's the reverse, or maybe 30-70. Because in TV, you spend most of your time talking to people to set up the shoot, getting the camera crew, getting people to the right place, getting clearance, and setting the scene. It is tremendously more time-consuming than writing the story.