By using the wildlife agriculture paradigm and the nutritional carrying capacity model, they cannot threaten forest sustainability, landowner goals, and wildlife diversity within a society increasingly less involved and connected to the craft of hunting without threatening hunter integrity. The values and experiences that motivate individuals to hunt or not to hunt are diverse and complex. And, while most people have decided not to hunt, the majority supports the rights of those who do. It appears to many citizens that deer management in Pennsylvania has sidestepped the issue of values and the reality of our management choices. Science can document what the options are and what the benefits and tradeoffs might be.
Opinion is defined as a judgment, belief, or estimation.
Science is a systematic knowledge of natural and physical truths ascertained by observation, experimentation, and induction. Opinions should be valued and respected as red flags that draw attention to possible flaws in the system or the need for a better explanation or communication. However, no matter how well intentioned, opinions should not be allowed to modify the recommendations of a science-based program without providing data that is put through the rigors of the scientific method. We are here today because many people believe that deer management in Pennsylvania is not working. But I believe it can.