On the whole, they like the way he handles the economy, the budget, Iraq, education and health care. Many of them also don't believe his accusers, especially the ones who have book deals on the horizon. But for a lot of them, saying yes to Clinton also appears to be their way of just saying no to Monicagate, meaning no to the very idea of making intimate personal behavior, even skanky behavior, the subject of a criminal inquiry. This is not the same thing as saying none of them care what the President does in his personal life, which is the standard, shorthand misrepresentation of that position. Above all, the notion that sexual misconduct should become the basis for a crisis that shakes the Republic seems to them a bit much.
Public ridicule is one thing.
Impeachment is another. But I don't think he should lose his presidency over it. One thing would be evidence that he lied under oath, they say, though some of them also say lying about sex is only to be expected. Another would be evidence that he was guilty of really harassing the women in question, though for some that means proving he did not take no for an answer after being pushed away the first time. Oddly, Clinton may even be benefiting directly from the scandal.