When you question their assumptions about this, they come back with veiled threats and ad hominem arguments. The power of these people is scary. Keep up the good work. . . Your argument holds true for the unauthorized use of the device in a prison or child custody situations, but in other cases it is a revolutionary and standardized method of determining the etiology of one's criminal persuasion. Revolutionary, perhaps, but in no way a standardized method of determining the etiology of anything, except perhaps the gullibility of soldiers, cops, prosecutors, parole boards, psychologists and social workers.
Most people miss it.
You missed my whole point, charlie. Let me break it down to you. I work in a residential care unit for witnessed sex offenders who for one reason or another stand incompetent to stand trial. To make it simple, if they proved stimulated by a snapshot of a naked infant, their placement would be as far from infants as was possible. This expands to protect the public from any pursuits, because their conduct shows that they have low impulse control, and respond vigorously to stimuli that they see as appealing.