Without inclusion of the question which I was answering my response sounded abrupt and negative. This was never intended. I think that to say that the final answer about the Shroud comes through faith and not science is a pious ploy by which the programme tried to soften its subtle verdict that the Shroud is not authentic. But this answer is not adequate. We do not need the Shroud for our faith.
Faith is there without it.
We are not and should not speak about our Christian faith versus the Shroud of Turin. We need to address it on its own, and science, and the professional arts with their imaging experience, are part of it. As we move forward and we know more, this challenge becomes more intense and moves us forward into the future. I think we follow a leader.