Our law now says, in effect, that fatherhood has no meaning, and we are shocked that some men have learned that lesson too well. It has corrupted the Supreme Court, which has protected the abortion license even while tacitly admitting its lack of constitutional grounding. The law on everything from free speech to biotechnology has been distorted to accommodate abortionism. And abortion has deeply corrupted the practice of medicine, transforming healers into killers. Projections of this sort almost always turn out to be wrong because they fail to grasp that, in matters of human behavior, there is not really any such thing as a trendline.
People change to meet new realities and thereby change reality.
Thus, for the environmental hysterics of the 1970s, the nuclear freezers of the 1980s, and the Perovian budget doomsayers of the 1990s, the end that was nigh never came. This time, it seems, the pessimists were right. On Sunday, November 2, an article in the New York Times, the closest thing we have to the voice of the intellectual establishment, came out for killing babies. I am afraid that I am sensationalizing only slightly. The article by Steven Pinker in the Times Magazine did not go quite so far as to openly recommend the murder of infants, and printing the article did not constitute the Times endorsement of the idea.