Reasoning about a single path can take minutes or sometimes, when dealing with concurrency, hours. Further, the reliability of manual inspection is erratic. These methods leave implementors in an unfortunate situation. Verification is impractical for most systems. Testing misses many cases and makes diagnosis difficult.
Manual inspection is unreliable and tedious.
One possible alternative is to use static compiler analysis to find rule violations. Unlike verification, compilers work with the code itself, removing the need to write and maintain a specification. Unlike testing, static analysis can examine all execution paths for errors, even in code that cannot be conveniently executed. Further, a compiler analysis pass reduces the need to construct numerous test cases and scales from a single function to an entire system with little increase in manual effort. Compilers can be used to enforce systems rules because many rules have a straightforward mapping to program source.