No explanation was forthcoming. The Melvey, St. John and Slater affidavits were attached to the reply, along with several additional affidavits and exhibits. Petitioner made no further application to submit such material pursuant to ' 276.5. The affidavit of Carol Slater is rejected as well, because it was never signed by the affiant. I have considered the remaining affidavits and exhibits only insofar as they address respondent's affirmative defenses.
Petitioner seeks relief on a broad range of issues.
Presumably, it is petitioner's view that, following the Friday morning incident, the principal and assistant principal knew or should have known of J.H.'s alleged threats, that sending J.H. home did not ensure against J.H. following through on such threats and, consequently, that the Friday night incident occurred because the administrators had handled the morning incident inappropriately. To the extent petitioner appeals on behalf of other students, therefore, her claims are dismissed. Respondent contends that petitioner lacks standing regarding J.U., as well, because he was not involved in the Friday morning incident. J.U. was stabbed during the Friday night incident. On the record before me, however, I cannot conclude that the Friday morning incident was handled inappropriately or that the high school administrators had reason to foresee the Friday night incident.