And they follow their views. He formed it to be inhabited, which is not the case here. This was taught only in respect of supplementing. If one of them died or was found to be a saris the father has not fulfilled the duty of propagation. It is indeed a refutation.
Grandchildren are like children .
He formed it to be inhabited, which is the case here. All, at any rate, agree that two children of one are not sufficient. There he was merely putting them off, because R. Sheshet became impotent owing to the long discourses of R. Huna. Our Mishnah cannot represent the opinion of R. Joshua. A taste of Talmud .