Sometimes, preparing citations and examples before sitting down to write, I would simply marvel over the open books, it was like a trance, some kind of bewilderment with language, words, ideas, shadows of portraits, infinity. As for teaching, I wouldn't refuse one or two personally specialized courses in the future. Not for a general audience, but for one which would assemble specifically for me. Unfortunately, I can be interesting only to those for whom I am interesting. I doubt that I measure up to it.
Philosophy is too much of a professional affair, too allow oneself thought up creations.
Four or five paragraphs of thick unreadable text can totally disinterest me. I take a normal readers of philosophy. Afterwards, Kiekehor, Slolovjov. As for Nietsche, I see him not as a philosopher, but as a brilliant philologist. To himself a rebellious ethic.