Saying all this, I am not arguing that the individual results should be kept secret.
Next issue is about the results.
However, I think that this kind of scatter was expected. What was a nice result and what, I believe, Leonid is referring to, is a comparison of averages obtained by different methods and especially obtained by different instruments. Some people objected to this, but I think that was the only possibility to give the round robin a fair chance that results won't be wildly different. The fact that different instruments with very different resolutions gave similar results for size and strain is particularly encouraging. Again, if a specimen with smaller line broadening were selected, probably it would have favored higher-resolution instruments, and the results might have been vastly different.