In answer, therefore, to the question whether Ockham admitted any philosophical proof of God's existence one must first make a distinction. If, on the other hand, one means by 'God' the first conserving cause of this world, without any certain knowledge about the nature of that cause, Ockham did think that the existence of such a being can be philosophically proved. But, as this second understanding of the term 'God' is not all that is usually understood by the term, one might just as well say, without further ado, that Ockham did not admit the demonstrability of God's existence. Only by faith do we know, as far at least as certain knowledge is concerned, that the supreme and unique being in the fullest sense exists. From this it would seem to follow, as historians have argued, that theology and philosophy fall apart.
Every being is good.
God is a being. Therefore God is good. Only if we had a direct, intuitive knowledge of God could we know Him thus. Accordingly, God's intellect, will and essence are one. Ockham considers the theory of ideas in God as a piece of anthropomorphism.