Common searches for wisdom provide the most effective bases for decision-making. NASM consults widely within and beyond its membership, and proceeds after careful analysis of multiple factors and ramifications. Results achieved and functions fulfilled indicate effectiveness more than the presence of means or the utilization of methods. It judges resources in terms of results and not the reverse. Statements regarding scope of authority, operations, and decision-making must exhibit integrity, set reasonable limits, guide work, and promote the professionalism that engenders confidence.
Excellence requires expertise sufficient to each task.
Continuous development of competence in the Association and within member institutions is a primary goal. For further information , please see the Philosophy of Accreditation in the Arts Disciplines , the NASM Code of Good Practice for the Accreditation Work of NASM , and the NASM Code of Ethics in the NASM Handbook .