Apparently, petitioner and his wife regularly attended their daughters' athletic competitions. That letter explained that any inappropriate behavior at district games would result in his exclusion from future athletic contests. This appeal ensued. Petitioner's request for interim relief was denied on March 3, 1999. Petitioner contends that the allegations against him are untrue and that he was denied due process because he was not provided with adequate notice or a hearing before respondent barred him from attending his daughters' athletic events.
Petitioner asks that respondent's decision be reversed.
In the alternative, he asks for a hearing, with an opportunity to present witnesses and confront respondent's witnesses. Respondent argues that the appeal should be dismissed as untimely. Respondent contends petitioner is not entitled to a hearing, and that he never requested one. Respondent further contends that petitioner was afforded adequate due process prior to its determination. Initially, I must address several procedural issues.