Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to judgement against the Defendants pursuant to RSC Ord 14 rl 2. As there are substantial issues to be tried leave to defend should be granted. She has been employed by Plaintiff since 1996. The standard agreement at B 34. Otherwise does not make reference to proof of ownership.
Drops claim for damages or financial relief.
Claims the aim of the Defendants was to strike at Monsanto crops. The law and submissions 8. It is submitted that Plaintiff is not the correct party to bring an action for trespass to goods in this action. Trespass to goods is concerned with the direct, immediate interference with the plaintiff's possession of a chattel. This is an essential element of the tort.