No surprise there. If your average PC user had a clue, he or she would've bought a Mac instead. I understand that position, but I don't understand the position of calling Napster users thieves. There are two types of copyrights intended to protect creative artists. At what point the Napster user crosses the line is hard to determine.
Intent is a part of the question, though.
Whenever I look at the CD jacket or similar material, it's clear that the record company owns the copyright, not the artist. These royalties are paid by radio stations and should be paid when the same songs are broadcast or transferred over the Internet. All the elements of production are now within the financial reach of the independent artist. The Internet changes that, and thus threatens the RIAA's distribution monopoly. And I know that the record company owns all the physical media involved.