They wanted to liberate text from given context. In the communication age when texts old and new are easily drawn into the allusion field, closure has become less certain. The wffects of this on textual cohesion have been studied. If one ignores phonic cohesion then there's a fair but not strong match between the 2 taxonomies. Computer modules also differ in the extent that they interact with each other.
Programmers aim to write modules that have strong cohesion and weak inter-module coupling.
Extending these concepts leads to a way of classifying poems. The cohesion of computer modules isn't easily measured or characterised, but one can make a rough assessment of a poem's cohesion and coupling by comparing the number of internal and external references. A few illustrations will show how the reader's need to trace allusions varies. All this and not ordinary, not unordered in not resembling. The difference is spreading The weak semantic and formal cohesion are hallmarks of a modernist text.