However these kinds of drawings and pictures are only deceits. Since fossil records are usually disordered and incomplete, the evaluation based on them would be totally speculative. Since people are highly affected by visual information, the aim is to make them believe that these reconstructed creatures really existed in the past. Just for this reason, the reconstructions of fossils are always designed to meet the needs of the evolution theory. Evolutionist researchers often set out from a single tooth, a mandibular fragment or even a tiny bone of the arm, and draw human-like imaginary creatures, then present these to the public opinion as a link of the evolution of man.
Reconstructions based on remains of bones can only reveal the general characteristics of the object.
Yet, the real designating details are soft tissues that quickly vanish in time. Therefore, with the speculative interpretation of the soft tissues, the reconstructed drawing or model becomes totally dependent on the imagination of the person constructing it. To attempt to restore the soft parts is an even more hazardous under-taking. The lips, the eyes, the ears, and the nasal tip, leave no clues on the underlying bony parts. You can with equal facility model on a Neanderthaloid skull the features of a chimpanzee or the lineaments of philosopher.