Grammar, punctuation, and spelling are in accord with conventional usage. In a distinct voice, the writer will show in the paper a clear awareness of purpose and audience. The main idea is clear enough but more superficially or less convincingly developed. The organization basically suffices, but it is too mechanical, too general, or just underdeveloped. The ideas may be supported, but with insufficient examples or unrelated detail.
Paragraphs have problems with their focus, unity, development, or connection to the topic.
Transitions are lacking or inappropriate. Grammar, punctuation, and spelling may too often conflict with the conventions of standard written English. The thesis is non-existent or muddled, and the argument is unclear or inconsistent. Paragraphs lack topic sentences, focus, unity, adequate development, or connection to the topic and purpose of the paper. Transitions are lacking or misdirected.