Using the Nordness standard, we conclude that the totality of these facts would lead a reasonable officer to believe Campbell was operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant. The facts, taken as a whole, are sufficient to establish probable cause to arrest for operating while intoxicated. The Swanson court determined these three indicia formed a basis for a reasonable suspicion, but were not enough for probable cause. The facts before us differ markedly from the facts in Swanson. Unlike in Swanson , there were many indicators that Campbell had probably been operating his vehicle while intoxicated.
Probable cause is a test with a low threshold.
The evidence need not even reach the level that guilt is more likely than not. Campbell also argues that Nowack could not use the PBT results to determine whether there was probable cause to arrest. Since we have already determined that Nowack had probable cause to administer the PBT, it follows that he had probable cause to arrest with or without the PBT results. Finally, we address Campbell' s counsel's characterization of the facts. He was kind of back and forth, swaying slightly.