Defendant disregards the reasonable inferences which can be drawn from the above evidence, and argues the testimony favorable to her case caused the jury's reliance on incriminating circumstantial evidence to be insufficient. Credibility of witnesses and the weight and value to be given their testimony are matters within the province of the jury and are not subject to review on appeal. The jury was free to disbelieve Defendant's testimony, as well as her husband's, and accept as true the evidence of the state. Point I is denied. The judgment is affirmed.
Pseudoephedrine is extracted from the pills during the process of manufacturing methamphetamine.
I, Section 19 of the Missouri Constitution. However, much like Miranda, these cases all involved situations of express questioning by law enforcement officers while the accused was in custody. These cases are inapposite for the same reason Miranda is inapplicable.