If there was ever a need to question police acceptance of witnesses for verbalising innocent people as prima facie seems evident, it's now time for me to say it. I explain it this way. A person comes to police and makes a statement o f alleged criminal acts against them by an offender. Police never look at the character or question its suspicion of credibility in fact.
Police are narrow focussed in securing prima facie at worst against the offender in their brief.
In this it protexts the arse of the officer of claim by offenders Counsel of malicious intent and the Magistrate of awarding costs againsst the police. Police couldn't give buckleys that the person ltlhey may have summoned or charged may acturally be innnocent, there only concern is prima facie. I'm calling for in Legislation for Police to be criminally charged for their denial of the truth, in accepting falsehoods and fantasy. A brief shouldn't be just a day out in Court - a brief is a serious piece of legal tender in seeking conviction for a crime committed, not to accept the verbal of those who come from fear and are believed by lazy and blinker focussed tired NSW police officers. To live a straight and useful life seems no protection of the illegitimacy coming from the mouths of those with no conscience who justify their whim as triviality to the humanity they may be destroying, and the halting of properity to the offenders rught to a job - once prima facie or at worst conviction has been passed.