Since the claims in both appeals are based on the same election, I have consolidated them for decision. The appeals are dismissed. Petitioners challenge the election of Ms. Murphy, asserting respondent electioneered to ensure her re-election. Petitioners also challenge the results of the budget vote based on the alleged improper dissemination and tabulation of absentee ballots.
Petitioners seek to overturn the election and budget vote.
Respondent contends that petitioners have failed to demonstrate by competent evidence that any qualified voters were actually denied the right to vote or that any electioneering occurred. I must first address a procedural matter. While petitioners seek to remove Ms. Murphy from office, they have failed to name her as a party in this proceeding. Since a ruling in petitioners' favor could adversely affect Ms. Murphy's status on the board, the petition must be dismissed for non-joinder of a necessary party. Regarding the merits, it is well-established that there is a presumption of regularity in the conduct of an election.