Mr. Hammer retained legal counsel to represent him in that matter. Ken Hammer's employment as city manager commenced July 7, 1994. It terminated May 13, 1997. The agreement included a schedule pursuant to which the city would pay amounts agreed upon. Summary judgment was entered denying the relief plaintiffs sought.
Plaintiffs present one point on appeal.
When an event occurs which renders a decision unnecessary, the appeal will be dismissed. The existence of an actual and vital controversy susceptible of some relief is essential to appellate jurisdiction. See also Kracman v. Ozark Elec. State ex rel. The payments plaintiffs sought to enjoin have been made.