Probably not a good suggestion to a lawyer type, idiots. That's not economical either, or enviornmental as far as I'm concerned because it results in litigation that sucks dry any money that might have been available for water quality programs. This is where we are. If I question the party line, I'm the problem, even though I'm looking for a very hard to find source of pollution. The point is that when you get into practical application of this philosophy, it's not as black and white as a philosophical discussion.
Roles change, people want power and control for their own side many times ignoring the cost.
In ecological economics I think it's important to have a system to evaluate true costs, data, which take patience, time and investment. We need more information and less propaganda from all parties to really make a difference.