In reporting on scientific issues, the journalist relies heavily on the scientist. The person who has done the experiment or the research is the one who can best relate its scientific impact. The task of the scientist must be to present the pertinent information to the writer in such style and language that there is no question of misunderstanding or misinterpretation. The clarity of the information presented must bridge the gap of mystery with which science issues are often surrounded. It is probably not possible for writers or scientists to be unaffected by politics or self-interest in plying their craft.
Personal bias is a natural component of most creative endeavor.
However, it is hoped that critical thinking and rational argument on both sides will ensure that the reading public receives coverage that is scientifically correct, intellectually honest, and as unbiased as possible. This workshop is designed to provide an occasion for journalists to meet with scientists, to provide an opportunity for an exchange of ideas between the two fields of expertise with a view to opening new lines of communication and expanding areas of understanding. All rights reserved. Web site design and maintenance by Black Bay Solutions . For best results, use a table-compliant browser to view this site.