The very construction of the agenda singles out one member State for special condemnation - thus abridging that Member's equality and due process rights under the Charter. This is, undoubtedly, at the same time a question of principle. The Commission has rightfully attempted to restructure its agenda, yet the problem surrounding Israel's treatment persists. The departure from procedural fairness in examining Israel under a separate agenda item undermines the Commission's legitimacy in examining all human rights violations. The protection of human rights will always entail a political dimension.
Human rights are, after all, a question of State behaviour.
But if the Commission on Human Rights is to enjoy credibility and legitimacy, it must ensure its procedures are not abused for political ends. Only the Commission can put its own house in order.