Response indicates that there is a guidance committee, but the exact composition and role of the committee is not clearly defines. There is evidence of construction industry involvement in the plan, but no or limited specificity of which industries and how they specifically been involved or will be involved. Response indicates a commitment, but no specific plans are delineated. Response indicates that there has been an intensive analysis of local and regional construction labor needs supported by data. The proposal identifies the specific construction trades with shortages, and the proposal ties its training to those shortages.
Response indicates that there has been an analysis of local and regional construction labor needs.
The proposal identifies the construction trades with shortages, but the proposal does not specifically tie its training to those shortages. Response indicates that there is a need for labor in the local and regional construction industry but gives no supporting evidence. Proposal does not tie its training to shortages. Evaluation plan clearly connects up with purpose and expected outcomes of project. Strategies proposed will result in quantitative results.