In one sense, the most blatant acts of child abuse are the easiest to deal with. In those situations, most psychologists have no question in their minds that a report should be made. However, the decision to report becomes more difficult when the abuse is less blatant. Psychologists who are unclear if a situation warrants reporting can call their county children and youth agency and present the facts as a hypothetical situation to ascertain their professional responsibility. Although such a consultation ultimately may not shield the psychologist from legal responsibility, it may help show that under the circumstances, the psychologist acted in a reasonable, professional manner.
Documentation is always desirable.
Psychologists who suspect that abuse has occurred should document the reasons for their suspicion. Conversely, in some circumstances psychologists should document that they do not suspect abuse. For example, a psychologist may see a patient who has an isolated symptom consistent with a suspicion of abuse, but the psychologist may not suspect abuse because the totality of circumstances do not lead to the level of certainty indicated in the Child Protective Service Law. Once again, such measures will help show the reasonableness of the decision made by the psychologist. Effects of statutes requiring psychiatrists to report suspected sexual abuse of children.