The one assumes to itself the right of withholding liberty of conscience, and the other of granting it. The one is the Pope, armed with fire and faggot, and the other is the Pope selling or granting indulgences. The former is church and state, and the latter is church and traffic. But toleration may be viewed in a much stronger light. There would be an uproar.
Mind thine own concerns.
If he believes not as thou believest, it is a proof that thou believest not as he believeth, and there is no earthly power can determine between you. Let us bestow a few thoughts on this subject. All religions are in their nature mild and benign, and united with principles of morality. They could not have made proselytes at first, by professing anything that was vicious, cruel, persecuting or immoral. It proceeds from the connection which Mr. Burke recommends.