A participant in one standard, but an outsider in another. Well it's possible that we don't need another. If we look at some of the current outlets for discussion of standards, we see a number of problems. They also only accept a certain type of article. There is comp.std.
Many sites only hold news for a few days and items can easily be missed.
Nor are the comp.std. Finally there are the reflectors for WG21, WG14, etc, but these are by definition of restricted availability. Obviously there is a certain degree of overlap between what currently is published in journals, comp.std. I believe there are many potential contributions, however, which do not currently have a suitable outlet. I hope to make the ISDF Newsletter such an outlet.