As a result, a bus continued to pick Jacqueline up at her home, stop at the district's high school as a pick-up point for students attending other nonpublic schools and continued on to drop Jacqueline at St. Helen's. However, respondent discontinued transporting Justin from home to the high school on that bus. Upon notification of the new transportation arrangement, petitioner requested reinstatement of Justin's transportation from home, but respondent refused that request. This appeal ensued. As part of her appeal, petitioner sought an interim order directing respondent to continue to pick both of her children up at her home pending a determination of this appeal.
Petitioner challenges respondent's revised transportation arrangement.
Petitioner also argues that respondent provides school to home transportation for Justin in the afternoon and, therefore, respondent should provide transportation from Justin's home in the morning. Respondent asserts that the provision of transportation to petitioner's children is both reasonable and in compliance with the requirements of law. Respondent is not required to provide home to school transportation for Justin. The record indicates that respondent set an earlier time for students such as Justin to arrive at the centralized pick-up point for transportation to CBA because that school changed to an earlier starting time, and respondent wished to ensure that students arrived at CBA on time. Petitioner alleges that, because of respondent's current transportation schedule, she must transport her son to the centralized pick-up point established for CBA students, while leaving her daughter to wait for the bus at home at the bus stop.