No, because there would be too much inclination to 'psychologize' others, i.e., to create subjective standards based on the 'morality' of the persons creating those very laws and handing out judgements.
Individuals have different perceptions of what they consider morality to be.
Some percieve their morality as defined by their religious convictions, others don't believe in anything consistently enough to be able to decide what is moral or not, some believe that it is what they personally define it to be, the self-righteous type, etc. Laws should always be created as objective standards, i.e., standards which can be upheld based on demonstratable and provable facts - not implied, inferred, assumed, misconstrued, subjective moral standards. Some percieve their morality as defined by their religious convictions, others don't believe in anything consistently enough to be able to decide what is moral or not, some believe that it is what they personally define it to be, the self-righteous type, etc. Join the network for free. The Freedom Network is a service of The Henry Hazlitt Foundation .