His criticism weakens his position. Food today is touched by technology many steps of the way. Machines harvest, chemicals preserve most of the food we eat today. The size of our society and it's geographic distribution make it impractical to go back to the prior times. Tanna misses the point of vacation in his analysis of the article.
People look for a change from their everyday surroundings to something different.
Those in rural areas go to cities, and the city dwellers go to the country. His analysis of what is natural is a little out of place. The second paragraph does nothing to support his claim of unspoiled nature in the ad. He claims the stores and buildings are left out because they are not natural, but having seen many ads for this area, that is not the case. Seaside, Florida is one such example.