In reality, cloning would probably be used by infertile people who now use donated sperm, eggs, or embryos, or by people who have not found a partner of the opposite sex. That bank has produced only between 129 and 218 children over about 20 years. The most likely use of cloning would be by people who cannot have children in the usual way, and who want to have a child who is like themselves, rather than inviting an unknown stranger's genes into the family. The major argument against cloning is that it would rob individuals of their uniqueness, a uniqueness that some consider ordained by God or Nature. Actually, we are far more than our genes.
Nature clones people all the time, and rather frequently.
One in 67 births is of twins. Ask any twin whether he or she is an individual or a carbon copy of someone else. Twins enter different occupations, get different diseases, live different lifespans, and have different experiences with marriage, alcohol, mental illness, community leadership, and homosexuality. Theologically, they have different souls, as would cloned individuals. Even if somebody did clone 2,000 Napoleons, they would all be different, because they would be raised in different families.