And while it's perhaps a declaration against interest, I increasingly look on people who read as a niche audience. It's a large niche, and it's a particularly influential and important one. And it's one that is really for people who want a level of synthesis, of analysis, of making sense of information that I think in many cases video and even radio cannot provide. And then the question that should be asked in the light of Princess Diana's dangerous paparazzi, and the recent hounding of Monica Lewinsky, Henry Luce used to defend the wall between church and state, between the editorial and the business sides of a publication. There are economic pressures.
Money does drive journalism.
If we're not profitable, we don't have money to invest. And we have to make those judgments every day. Beyond that, I think there's also a question of getting the balance right between what readers are asking for and what we, as editors, think readers ought to know. I think when money starts to corrupt journalism, it undermines the journalism, and it undermines the credibility of the product, and you end up not succeeding. The magazine cost 15 cents, consisted of 32 pages, and, another first, compartmentalized the news into 22 departments.