Petitioner's request for interim relief pending a determination on the merits of the appeal was denied on August 18, 1994. Petitioner alleges that respondents violated the shared decisionmaking regulation by unilaterally altering the plan without the approval of the designated representatives. Petitioner also alleges that this action was taken due to respondents' longstanding animosity toward school psychologists. Respondents contend that as a procedural matter, the appeal fails to state a cause of action, that petitioner has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies and that the appeal is moot. Respondents also contend that petitioner has failed to work constructively with the district to resolve fiscal problems.
Respondents contend that the matter is now moot.
Because the record indicates that Dr. Hall resigned from the building team and the teachers' association appointed a speech teacher to that position, the controversy is now moot. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. In light of the foregoing disposition, I will not address the merits of petitioner's appeal.