I have the luxury of choosing my own occupation. Often they do not have the choice to work in the rice paddies. The national governments earn much more money from converting land to industrial use from agricultural use. Nike will pay a much higher tax than the local land owner, which is often the government as well. Isn't it us who are taking away choice, by stripping these countries of their natural resources, and paying them virtually nothing in return.
Nobody chooses to work in a sweatshop if they have a reasonable and humane alternative.
However what is happening here is probably on a scale which is incomprehensible to a lot of people. I do have a problem with them employing children and working people for ridiculously long hours. Both of those went away in this country a century ago. I also don't have a problem with individual consumers making their purchase decisions based on which corporations encourage or discourage these practices. If that takes the form of buying my shoes at the next store over, so be it.