Perhaps this clarifying column makes obvious the misunderstandings I have suffered. For instance, I never criticized the message of hope and education delivered by the speakers. I question some of their ties to certain groups, and some of the things they stand for, but not necessarily in the lectures they presented. There is no truth to that statement. I did question the funding of this program as a policy issue, which is well within the bounds of someone who treasures free speech.
Journalists everywhere question all sorts of funding.
I never said it should be abolished or even shouted down. I just criticized it no more, no less. With relief, however, I take note that not everyone is quick to jump the gun. And, if anything positive may come out of this, we have ignited a sense of renewed activism and spirit on campus. Part of my role as editor is to make people think, and that includes offering up ideas that are horse pills for many to swallow.