However, biochemical and molecular biological research continues to gather convincing evidence that the living cell is totally useless unless, and until, it reaches its final form, and then, having reached that form, any change at all actually destroys, not enhances, its function. Darwin's greatest challenge comes from the question of how the individual cell developed. The scientific literature is strangely silent when it comes to the question of how these molecular structures, the basis of life, developed. Proponents of Intelligent Design have made great headway in recent years. Together, these evidences, along with many others, form a convincing case for the idea of Creation and Intelligent Design.
Evolutionists appear unwilling to address the findings of biochemistry and other related fields.
Those who prefer the Creation and Intelligent Design explanation for life cannot be conveniently stereotyped as backward, ignorant, flat-earth fanatics. And these millions are being joined by growing numbers of biologists, geologists, paleontologists, physicists, medical doctors, mathematicians and other professionals in the pure and applied sciences. Their designer knew what the systems would look like when they were completed, then took steps to bring the systems about. This natural knowledge of a Creator is not the same as advancing a set of specific theological and doctrinal beliefs about that Creator. If Creation is theistic, calling for an intelligent, purposeful Author of Life, then naturalistic Evolution is atheistic, denying the existence of that Author and any supernatural acts wrought by His hand.