At the very least they will hit a growth wall beyond which they can expect consistently lower rates of economic growth unless the cultural and structural biases against services are broken down. Many of these differences say for example the second one which notes the difference between a focus on profits and a focus on growth would strike many as not necessarily a matter of one being right and one being wrong. The table merely looks at differences in styles. It contains no value judgments. Also in your book you look at the two major economies in Asia Japan and China and your assessment for both is really quite negative.
Japan is something of an anomaly.
It has grown wealthy on a framework of third world corporate governance. It did very well out of having the United States write its constitution after the second world war and having various regulatory agencies established by the Americans that were modelled on US agencies. On top of that, Japan has had a comparatively long history of significantly investing in education which South-East Asian countries do not have. These factors were very important to Japan s economic success post-world war two. However, eventually problems derived from Japan s systems of corporate governance, inadequate common law procedures and competition enforcement accumulated and what had been the relatively efficient machine of the Japanese economy simply fell apart and was unable to demonstrate the agility and flexibility to adjust to changing external conditions.