They were all perceived to infringe freedom. But the freedom was impinged for the good cause of public health. Those who objected on each issue were not sufficiently numerous. The do gooder could ignore their objections and impose restrictions on their behavior - for their own good. It could be padding when walking on the pavement.
People regularly fall and injure themselves.
It could be carrying lightning conductors, not being allowed to eat chocolate or meat. It could be anything. They appear preposterous, but they will be implemented for our own good. One iota at a time our freedom will be taken away in the name of our own good. It is about telling them what to do.