The composition of the council appears to be the result of an attempt by respondent and the Association to remold a pre-existing committee to fulfill the requirements of 100.11. However, it appears that the council also acts as the district's planning committee since it is also responsible for facilitating the development of the written plan, and reviewing and revising the plan. Accordingly, to the extent the council serves as the district planning committee, I find that respondent's appointment of board members to the council violates 100.11. However, there is no evidence in the record that this defect requires the annulment of the district plan. Therefore, I will not set aside the plan on this basis.
Petitioner also objects to the fact that support staff and students sit on the council.
Section 100.11 prescribes the mandatory participants for the planning committee and does not include students or staff. Thus, students and support staff are not necessarily prohibited from serving as members of the committee as long as the requirements of the regulation continue to be met. Thus, I cannot grant petitioner the relief she requests in this regard. Finally, petitioner alleges that the public was denied the opportunity to participate in the decision making process. Petitioner provides no evidence to substantiate her claim or to demonstrate that respondent has not made the plan available to the public.