The appeal must be dismissed.
Petitioner seeks an order rescinding all proceedings and resolutions adopted at such meetings.
Respondent raises a number of procedural defenses to the petition. Initially, respondent maintains that I lack jurisdiction over alleged violations of the Open Meetings Law. Respondent also claims that the petition is defective in format, lacks proper notice and fails to state a clear and concise statement of petitioner's claim showing that petitioner is entitled to the relief sought. The appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Inasmuch as petitioner's appeal consists solely of allegations that respondent failed to effect proper notice of board meetings required by the Open Meetings Law, dismissal for lack of jurisdiction is warranted.