Petitioner also alleges that respondent has failed to provide documents to her concerning student enrollments. Respondent contends that the petition is untimely and should be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Respondent also contends that it properly adopted a contingency budget and submitted subsequent budget propositions. Before reaching the merits, I will address the procedural issues. Petitioner takes issue with respondent's actions concerning the contingency budget and subsequent budget propositions which were submitted to the public for a vote at various public meetings, the last of which was on July 15, 1993.
Petitioner offers no excuse for the delay.
The appeal must, therefore, be dismissed as untimely. The appeal must also be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The petition contains rambling allegations that fail to state any comprehensible claim. As a practical matter, respondent is unable to defend itself against such unfocused allegations. The appeal must also be dismissed on the merits.