The appeal must be dismissed. Prior to the bond vote, respondent disseminated three informational newsletters to district residents. On the day of the vote, the newsletters were placed at the polling place, although their exact location is in dispute. This appeal ensued.
Petitioner seeks an order setting aside the results of the special election.
He also seeks an order requiring respondent to render an accounting of the money spent on the newsletters, their distribution and the costs of holding the special election. Petitioner further alleges that respondent's newsletters improperly advocated approval of the bond issue and contained false information. Respondent contends that its newsletters were merely informational in nature and thus proper. Respondent also claims that petitioner has not presented any evidence that anyone was deceived by the information presented and claims that petitioner fails to state facts showing that he is entitled to relief. Respondent also contends that petitioner's reply is improper on procedural grounds.