The more I think about this, the less certain I am. I believe any audit should require financial disclosure of board members, and for SOs as well. That means I believe it was a mistake for the board to vote not to make financial disclosures public, as Chairman Dyson indicated in dissent. I support that policy. Some observers fear that this assertion provides a basis for excessive state control.
False scarcity gives no justification for government control of a resource.
Name space, if it is scarce, it falsely scarce. But as a citizen of the United States, I strongly support US policies that would limit IP rights so as to support a strong and vibrant free speech environment. I am concerned however that the domain name registration process has not been sufficiently attentive to concerns about privacy, especially for individual domain name holders. It should not allow the technical architecture to become a substitute for policy decisions made by politically accountable institutions.