Discussion on the questions will take place via the list. The outcome should provide the TFAC with feedback about what we've done so far, how we can improve the process, and give us ideas about new target areas to address. We would expect some common themes to surface which could be categorized, prioritized, and worked on by the committee. This subcommittee is reviewing a template which will be used in the solicitation process. An example should be made available for next meeting.
Further discussion is needed.
John Fossum seconded motion. Discussion regarding the motion involved a time frame for a decision to be conveyed to the parties involved in the process. Bill Perrizo moved to recommend to the President and Vice President of Academic Affairs that there be no more than a month between when TFAC makes their recommendations to them and when the final decision is announced. John Grosen seconded motion. Identification Labels and Logo Design activity of a logo is being worked on in University Relations.