In any case, I wonder how it'll be interpreted. That amounts to cultural imperialism in my book. I have mixed feelings about this. English is predominant, or at least appears that way if you're in the USA and participating in lists based here, but there are lots of people elsewhere writing in French, Spanish, etc. One can argue, as I have in an article on transborder data flows, that there's a real problem when Costa Rican doctors or Egyptian lawyers or whomever want to access data bases and other info resources on line, and they're overwhelmingly in English and may reflect certain cultural assumptions and economic models which are not well suited to these folks' local environments.
Language can indeed impart values, etc.
But given the size of the USA market and the relative degrees of networking, this predominance is easy to understand. Perhaps things will get better in time as more people around the world get ready access to the tools and put up their own stuff. In any event, it's not obvious to me that because of the immediate condition, the Internet is inherently characterized by cultural imperialism and hence to be opposed as an American imposition on the rest of the world.