The mandate compelled the FDA to implement the First Amendment disclaimer process as described by the appeals court to the FDA's health-claims approval process. The constitutionally correct remedy for truthful, but inadequate, information is to provide more information, not to prohibit the truthful information. But what DHHS has now proposed as medical records confidentialty rules is surprise, surprise a complete fraud.
People really do want to keep more of their own money.
They just don't want to have to pay high taxes so that some group favored by politicans can pay less. The implications of the recent court rulings for life extension are immense. In order to extend human lifespan, it is necessary to do more than just research to discover how aging and age-related diseases work and what can be done to intervene. You have to be able to turn research into practical products that people can buy and use, and you have to be able to inform people of what the products do and how they work. The FDA has long stood as the major barrier to these activities.