Papers may also be far off the mark by taking the meanings of central terms to be clear and univocal whereas multiple meanings are present. Avoiding ambiguity or indeterminacy of expressions is desirable, but resolving ambiguities by throwing out nuances and meanings is not helpful in exploring reality. When nuances are left aside, a more manageable but less adequate image replaces reality. You shall not bow to a graven or written image as if it has caught univocally in its construction and argumentation everything that is in heaven above, or that is on earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. Talk of a 'cosmic order', 'a moral universe', 'Divine design', or harmony between theological beliefs and scientific insights can be one-sided if not misguided.
Religion also gives voice to experiences of injustice and disorder.
Science describes and explains, whereas religion looks for transformation towards justice and perfection. This problem led Marcion to the first major heresy in the history of Christianity. He did not see how the Creator of this ambivalent world could be the loving Father of Jesus Christ. This challenge is still with us in the contrast between facts and values, between reality as it is and as it should be. The issue is not just the origin and explanation of evil and of tragic aspects of life, but their acceptability.