But a psychiatrist's honest conclusion does not always serve the best interest of the patient. The American Psychiatric Association has the same set of ethical principles. This always includes the party retaining the psychiatrist and any involved court. It may also include other parties. Informing the examinee of the limits of confidentiality is similar to a Miranda warning.
Exceptions are, for example, court-ordered examinations.
The ethical forensic psychiatrist must adhere to the principles of honesty and strive for objectivity. In some situations, objectivity is difficult. An example is a presentencing evaluation of a rapist. But an ethical forensic psychiatrist must strive for objectivity in any case. The ethical forensic psychiatrist claims expertise only in the areas of actual knowledge, skill, training and experience.