People seemed - people in general seemed to be able to make that distinction, whereas, Congress and the press initially did not. And then there was the other distinction between approval of the job that President Clinton was doing in office, job approval in the polls, and approving of him as a human being. They didn't generally approve of him as a human being, or at least not the way he behaved in the Monica Lewinsky business, but they very much approved of the way he was running the country, and, again, they were able to make that - that distinction and that power of discrimination, which seemed lacking elsewhere, it was nice to see. Just that, Phil. I think at least for a while we saw a growing level of sophistication about sex and the Monica Lewinsky business, in terms of the press really about journalism.
People love a story but people also know the story they want to hear.
The press pursued the Monica Lewinsky story as if it were Watergate. If you do pursue the story that way, you're going to wind up with Watergate and the president would be out. Other people didn't like the movie. It wasn't a question they didn't like the subject and they certainly liked the author, Toni Morrison, enough, but they made their own choice, and that was nice to see. The same thing happened with books.