It may sometimes be too obvious, or otherwise ineffective. The paper has a recognizable introduction and conclusion. Transitions often work well. There are instances when connections between ideas are fuzzy or call for inferences. Despite a few problems, the organization does not seriously get in the way of the main point.
Pacing is uneven.
The writer lingers too long on some points and skims over other points. Ideas, details or events seem strung together in a random, haphazard fashionor else there is no identifiable internal structure at all. Sequencing, if it exists, needs work. The writer has not yet drafted an introduction or conclusion. Lack of organization makes it hard for the reader see how the ideas link to each other or how they link to a main idea.