To some extent, both the original article and the discussion have taken on psychological, sociological and even philosophical overtones. To see 'Western' as synonymous with 'scientific' has created something of a muddle. Some commentators have even introduced terms like 'colonial' for Western or European knowledge. Indigenous knowledge is becoming depleted, as a result of disturbances in our natural and biological resources. Indigenous knowledge is useful, even essential, both in itself and in conjunction with inputs which provide solutions to local problems and promote sustainable development.
Indigenous knowledge touches the lives of many people.
The main point is where, by whom, and for whom indigenous knowledge should be archived or documented. In the course of this discussion, the term 'pirate' has appeared in publications on indigenous knowledge and intellectual property rights. The importance of the 'consent of the community' should not be exaggerated. Naturally, it is only fair that the rights to economic or other gains from indigenous knowledge should rest with the community. But those who have spent many years in indigenous communities are also capable of serving as judges and mediators.