I enjoyed reading your comments on my comments, and am responding in kind. I must admit that I regard all of this as an intellectual game and have no illusions that I am anywhere closer to the truth on any of these matters than anybody else. As I see these issues, they are only different perspectives, influenced by the baggage we carry. It depends on how 'monotheism' and 'polytheism' are defined. This vision of God brings out the unity in human experience more emphatically than the monotheism which claims for itself the monopoly of the nature and name of God which results in disunity in the world.
Nothing can happen outside experience.
Raman questions this statement, and suggests that instead nothing that happens outside experience can be subjected to analysis or discourse. I am afraid there is some misunderstanding here. Let me explain MY statement which has obviously led to some misunderstanding. I am suggesting, as you are correctly pointing out, that we can only analyze and hold discourse on what happens within our experience. Indeed I know that a great many things are happening in the world which are beyond my personal experience.