But this allowed him to break from his usual practice of focusing solely on Darwinism's flaws, freeing him to isolate and pick at the Christian blunders in the debate. People view science as the empirical means of attaining hard facts. From the very beginning, the Christian viewpoint is disadvantaged by this method. That is, we must use Darwinism's discrepancies as a wedge to divide the Darwinists, and we must quit bickering over segregating issues such as the age of the earth and the literalism of Genesis. Even more important, Johnson said, creationists must understand that the fundamental premise of Darwinism is agnosticism.
Nature is all there is.
This underlying premise is central and cannot be overlooked. He could and does do that. Yet the most basic tenet of naturalism is that scientists have discovered a creative mechanism that discounts God. If you understand this, you'll understand why there is no such thing as God-guided evolution. If it is God-guided, then it's not evolution, but slow creation.