The anthropological evidence clearly shows that man came out of Africa. If he is going to come from there, you gotta get him there first. So, Egypt and parts south place the survivors much closer to the place we see them exit many years later. As to the scripture saying the mountains of Ararat and indicating that these are in Turkey, I would propose that there may have been a misunderstanding on the part of the descendants as to where those mountains were. The location they believed it to be may not have been the correct place.
Duplicate names occur often in history.
But, if someone were to tell me that absolutely positively there is no way that the landing site could be in Africa, I would and could easily switch to the southern shore of Turkey and fit that criteria. But I would then be faced with the problem of somehow getting the descendants into Africa.