That name refers to the parapsychology and that psychology is considered as an unreliable kind of science. Not only this is an extraordinary haughty point of view, but it is also conflicting with nearly the whole philosophical tradition. Philosophy has always been a way of pure thinking without the use of acquired knowledge. Pure philosophy is not based on what one believes to know, even if this knowledge has proved itself as absolute reliable. Of course there is nothing against it but to find an answer to the question 'how is reality' it is insufficient.
Philosophy is autonomous and finds the truth in itself.
So, as a kind of study of literature. And based hereupon they produce a design of a critical survey of some philosophical theme. Most of them however studied not any form of philosophy at all but other disciplines like law, theology, mathematics and so on. That is fully understandable because philosophical thinking cannot be learned like you learn a language or something like that. It is a gift that only can be developed in yourself by constant asking questions about reality.