Thus, the content of knowledge springs from the educatees. Unlike animals, humans have the ability to separate themselves from the activity and see it as separate from themselves. This is process peasants recognize themselves as transformers of the world. This an important claim. According to this explanation, Freire proposes constant challenge and growth for both the educator and the educatee.
Growth is a constant lifetime process for all participants in discussion.
At the same time there remains a question of any hierarchy of knowing. Otherwise, one subject can be viewed as further along in knowing and therefore able to transmit, or extend, their knowledge unto the other. If thiis is the case, there remains the question as to how two subjects can determine progress if knowledge is relative. In conclusion, this essay not only provides important insight, but also provokes some responses that call for questioning. Perhaps that was the intention of this author, to make assumptions that call for further dialogue.