I note that in its reply petitioner attempts to expand the scope of the appeal by including new claims regarding allegations of impropriety that occurred during the vote. Petitioner may not augment the scope of the petition through its reply. Consequently, I will not consider the new claims raised in petitioner's reply and supplemental affidavit. The appeal must also be dismissed on the merits. The petition contains no factual allegations of actual wrongdoing by respondents, but merely speculates as to respondents' conduct at an upcoming election.
Mere speculation is insufficient to establish a clear legal right to relief.
Upon review of the limited scope of the petition, its speculative nature, and the procedural deficiencies noted above, I find no basis on which to sustain the appeal.