In this scheme, there is no place for intentions, and hence there are no false intentions. Preferences, revealed and stated, comprise the entire system. But some nomads are individuals from burgher groups, as is the case with many artists. I have always felt like a nomad in my loyalties. Burgher and nomad are ideal types, of course, and all of us are some of one and some of the other.
Nomads tend to be loyal to particular persons rather than to organized communities.
Burghers tend to be loyal to a place and to the institutions that go with it, including the people involved at a given time. But when those individuals are no longer part of those institutions, the burgher's loyalty toward them declines. Nomads' loyalties tends to be longer-term and less affected by circumstances. Burghers are more likely to be attached to people as allies in temporary battles, whereas nomads tend less to shift allegiance on the basis of particular issues. It makes sense that mobile people should have attachments that do not depend upon place and shift with circumstance.