At least the absolute adherence to a lymphocentric perspective has been eroded over the past 3 or 4 years - but it was highly prevalent before that. The fact that the anamnestic immune system tends to tolerate self and attack foreign is beyond dispute. A phagocentric immune system is closer to the truth but even this does not go deep enough. All immune activity stems from the success or failure of intracellular surveillance for malfunction in order to clear away danger. To re-emphasise, the system revolves around intracellular surveillance, within individual cells, for malfunction.
Malfunction is identified by and within each and every nucleated cell of the colony.
But, the component ideas presented in those articles have gradually born fruit and many have already been vindicated. But is it is far stronger now than when first adopted in the earliest versions. Of all the arguments to support the hypothesis, this gradual vindication of earlier assumptions, with a minimum of correction being required, is, I believe, the strongest. It is available should you show an interest. Tomai M A, Fitzgerald T J, Froberg M K. Macrophage and lymphocyte functions are down-regulated in newborn rabbits.