The case of programs running on the same machine and in same address space will be so well optimized that it will be like making an ordinary IPC and a procedure call respectively. And if the target for the revision are developers, consider how easier will it make the life of a HURD developer instead of how buzzword compliant it will be. Elsewhere, other folks agreed that writing servers in other languages would be a good option to keep available. Elsewhere, Marcus also added that performance was not really an issue, and that MIG fell short in several ways and needed to be either extended or replaced. I think this is what is planned for fork.
Faster computers make the constant overhead for single messages negligible.
The discussion proceeded in a friendly vein. Because this was the first translation, it was not decided how this document should be integrated into the distribution. He'll be able to point you at the right people, anyway. IIDA Yoshiaki is the current maintainer, and I'm now one of the contributors. See , for more information.