I've been asked to write an article telling people why they shouldn't vote for Harry Browne. Since I am not voting for him, I suppose I should be able to come up with some good reasons. To make my weaker points first and get them out of the way, Gore really could win, in which case the government will get bigger.
Republicans tend to be more libertarian when they've been recently been winning in a landslide.
Of course the argument must be changed entirely so that the voters no longer act as if the candidates are talking about money from their own pockets. Nothing could be worse than for people to keep winning this way. As long as they do, the most that anti-statists can ever accomplish is to have some vices legalized, only to be taxed and regulated until they are driven back underground. There seem to me to be two major reasons to vote for Browne. One is his intelligence, which is an overrated quality in a presidential candidate.