Collected written notes of review committee, with your responses and alterations to you plan proposal with the reasoning behind these changes. Read another student's proposal, write a review including a critique of both the strengths and weaknesses, logical progression of reinforcement, potential backfires and whether they are anticipated by yourself and the proposer, how the proposal addresses ethical issues, etc. 15 points each. It is expected that all written works produced outside of class will be completed in a fashion which reflects professional competence. Papers will be free from spelling errors and grammatical errors.
Pages are to be numbered, preferably in the bottom center or top right corner.
Any typo's which escape your watchful eye while typing will be corrected in pencil or pen prior to being turned in. There may be no more than 3 corrected typos, and no uncorrected typos per page. Quality and Appearance will be counted in the grade. Don't embarrass yourself with shoddy work. Part of professional competence lies in the conveyance of a message, as well as in the message itself.