The appeal must be dismissed. In response to the heavy use of its facility, the library sought to expand. The trustee is obligated to use these funds to pay the principal and interest on the bonds as they become due.
Petitioner challenges the agreement on a variety of statutory and constitutional grounds.
Petitioner requests that I find the agreement null and void. On the merits, respondent contends that the agreement is lawful and was executed to enable the library to obtain financing for a capital improvement that was duly approved by district voters. In reply, petitioner contends that the library is not a necessary party to this proceeding, but nevertheless, attaches a copy of an amended petition adding the library as a respondent. Although petitioner did not obtain permission to file an amended petition, she served this pleading on the library on April 2, 2000. The library has submitted an answer alleging, among other things, that 275.3 of the Commissioner's regulations does not authorize petitioner to serve an amended petition.