This, I believe, is due to the popularization of the term amongst audiences who have nothing but the term to go on. I do not know. History is a matter of facts, but a creative process is always under revision. You miss the forest for the trees. I do not know.
History is a matter of facts, but a creative process is always under revision.
Moshe's point is well taken. Certainly, the Klezmatics, who are considered pretty progressive, have obvious connections to their precursors. There is nothing unique about this. You miss the forest for the trees. Well, I think that there are several issues here.