Ideologues indignate that Reagan has travestied their principles. I notice that it's their principles, not mine, that he found suitable to travesty. This kind of quarrel doesn't interest me. My reasons for regarding libertarianism as conservative run deeper than that. My target is what most libertarians have in common with each other, and with their ostensible enemies.
Libertarians serve the state all the better because they declaim against it.
At bottom, they want what it wants. But you can't want what the state wants without wanting the state, for what the state wants is the conditions in which it flourishes. Silly doctrinaire theories which regard the state as a parasitic excrescence on society cannot explain its centuries-long persistence, its ongoing encroachment upon what was previously market terrain, or its acceptance by the overwhelming majority of people including its demonstrable victims. That is why libertarianism is just conservatism with a rationalisVpositivist veneer. Libertarians render a service to the state which only they can provide.