This gives a different argument. I find it hard to believe that a university dedicated to diversity contains an organization that attempts to devalue a religious ceremony by launching political attacks against it. I am used to the politically correct drivel that The Daily Collegian passes off as editorial opinion. Every so often, however, one stands out, beckoning me to respond. The Constitution spells out no such right.
Marriage is a privilege granted by state governments to whoever they choose.
Therefore, a state that bans any particular group from marrying is not violating anyone's rights. I'm sure my little brother would love to freeload off of the government. These examples may seem ridiculous, but they show that a line must be drawn somewhere. It is up to the states to draw this line wherever they see fit. I have no problem with groups lobbying their government to allow same-sex marriages.