A Mexican corporation, Defendant.
Plaintiffs move for an order of attachment.
Plaintiffs seeks a recovery of this sum. FCIA claims to be an agent of Great American Insurance Company, which is the insurer under a certain policy of insurance insuring certain account receivables of Hunter for losses resulting from the non-paymentof debts owed to Hunter, including but not limited to a certain debt owed by defendant to Hunter. Under the terms of Hunter's insurance policy, FCIA allegedly is or could be subrogated to a certain right to recovery belonging to Hunter against defendant for losses resulting from defendant's failure to pay the balance of the note. Plaintiffs move for an order of attachment against defendant, arguing that property belonging to defendant is located in this state in the form of accounts at Chase Manhattan Bank, Banque Paribas, Merrill Lynch and Banco Serfin. Plaintiffs contend that attachment is appropriate because defendant is not qualified to do business in New York, and because there is a prima facie cause of action in which plaintiffs believe they will succeed on the merits.