The appeals must be dismissed. Petitioner resides in respondent's school district. During that time, petitioner's daughter was involved in certain extracurricular activities and, specifically, in the high school student theatrical productions. Petitioner challenges respondent's Code of Conduct on two grounds. First, he claims the scope of the Code of Conduct is too broad in that students may be prohibited from participating in extracurricular activities if they are found to have used alcohol or drugs on or off school grounds.
Petitioner challenges respondent's authority to proscribe any student activity off school property.
Petitioner asserts that his refusal to sign the statement may not provide the basis for disciplinary action with respect to his daughter. Respondent contends that its Code of Conduct is permissible. Respondent asserts that, therefore, the appeal is moot. Respondent asserts the appeal is also moot on that basis. I will first address the procedural arguments raised by respondent.