In this particular case, at least, we may conclude that the presentation of important bibliographic information outweighs aesthetics. Again, our current labelling will require some adjustments to accommodate the WebPac template. Since this label should be acceptable to the maps folks, we suggest it be used for all 255s. Include in table for WebPac as well. Suggest to RMS that remaining 302s in the database be changed to 300.
Organization seems somewhat more ambiguous in context.
The current labels for the Notes fields can vary quite widely, depending on the format being displayed. The content of each of the 5XX fields should be made as self-explanatory as possible. WebPac, on the other hand, separates tags by scheme. This is another area where OPAC labelling varies widely according to format, and WebPAC's choice, though it matches one of our labels, seems unsatisfactory as well. Serials 700s do not appear at all.