I also wonder what her assumptions are. The wiser, and more common interpretation is that of a bar room brawl or some such.
Political indoctrination has no place in the classroom.
Again the lists of texts are so one sided that it is obvious that neither gender, sexuality or aggression are being presented with anything beyond bias. There is no effort to sort out the variables that relate to aggression. It is defined in such a way as to make her conclusions inevitable. There is a lot of violence in the inner city. Deprivation of either increases activity.