Others focus on comparing data in a few key areas. For example, planners might pay particular attention to changes in waste generation rates and recycling amounts before and after program implementation. Such an analysis may help point out areas in which a PAYT program can be improved. For example, if recycling rates level off sooner than anticipated, communities might increase the range of materials accepted. If changes are necessary, information about the improvement will need to be prepared and distributed through additional education and outreach .
Most communities view monitoring and evaluation as an ongoing process.
Periodically analyzing the program helps them understand its impact and make any needed improvements. In addition, communities often recommend avoiding possible program evaluation pitfalls. For example, many planners pay attention to factors beyond just overall waste reduction when evaluating their programs. Intangible issues, such as greater support for PAYT among special populations due to successful education and outreach, would not be reflected in an analysis that focused solely on waste reduction numbers. For answers to questions about evaluating the success of PAYT programs, visit monitoring and evaluation in the FAQ section of this Web site.