In contrast, transformational talking is more flowing and exploratory. The choice-creating process works best where a group faces a thorny shared problem they all care about. Most processes try to get clear on the problem first, then discuss it, than figure out a solution, etc. Choice-creating process just plucks these things like fruit as they arise from the ongoing conversation, with no effort to organize them. The group usually starts with some problem statement which evokes people's suggestions about how to handle it.
Most familiar processes treat suggestions as proposals.
But in choice-creating each suggestion is just written on the Solutions page. We're barking up the wrong tree. There's no effort to hold the conversation to any linear train of thought. The facilitator lets people know they've been heard and keeps the conversation moving forward. He or she doesn't revise what's already written, or check whether a piece of Data is factual or not, or try to get the group to pick the best solution from those listed.