No, it is not. While all surplus must ultimately be the work of labor, not all labor produces surplus. This is the second time Alejandro has made this particular logical error. Since if humans do not eat they will die, and this will extinguish their labor, it is necessary for them to eat so their capacity to labor will be restored. And since they can produce more than they consume, which is true because of the empirical fact of surplus, then labor produces more than is necessary.
Redistribution is one goal, and a very important one.
Some families should have their standards of living reduced and reduced dramatically. This will have to be clarified and explained.