Regarding the second premise. Evident from the exposition of Pantheism, which either totally or partially identifies the cosmos and God, who is the Immobile Being, Pure Act. Pantheism does not adequately define God and the cosmos. It fails to comprehend God as Pure Act because it fails to understand actuality itself. It fails to comprehend the mobile cosmos in terms of the dualism of potency and act because of its monistic tendency to view the cosmos either as purely fieristic, undetermined, potential or as purely static, and determined.
Pantheism takes being as univocal .
The classical realist objectively notes that being is analogous . God's existence, which is identical with his essence, does not exhaust all the possibilities of existence since there exist natures which possess existence, not in their own right as natures, but by participation in existence from God who is existence itself. It is true that whatever is real is one, but this unity is analogous. God is one in the purest ontological unity. The cosmos is one accidentally as a union of many substances.