The Noncommercial Domain Name Holder's Subcommittee on WG-B has put forth a position paper on the protection of famous marks.
Reasonable people can differ on the protection of famous marks.
This position paper is not reasonable. WIPO called for comments and addressed the most serious criticisms of its conclusions. You may disagree with its conclusions but it was an open process and the reasoning is laid out. Denying the existence of the WIPO report is not a part of an open process. Then there is the strawman argument - that a universally accepted definition of fame is required for the exclusion process to be implemented.