However, some debate preceded the making of the motion. Senator Symms offered another amendment immediately following the disposition of this amendment. Symms's second amendment was agreed to by voice vote. This ambiguity provides a giant loophole for the criminal. Second, the amendment would severely limit the type of ammunition to be regulated.
Many bullets are interchangeable between rifles and handguns.
This amendment would preclude the regulation of those bullets that may be intended for use in a rifle but, nevertheless, can be used in handguns. Those bullets are no less dangerous or deadly for law enforcement officers. We have already struck a fair and equitable balance in the definition of ammunition to be covered. Furthermore, this amendment is opposed by the author of this bill, the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, and many top executives from various police organizations. They feel the language is too broad and would dangerously weaken this legislation.