You asked 3. I do not like the idea of a fullscale removal of roads and other things strictly for grizzly bear management purposes. The truth is that humans are part of the proposed grizzly area, and an integral part, and any plan must deal with that existence instead of seeking to ignore it or deny it as the proposal seems to do.
Roads are a liability to taxpayers.
As my paper stated the Forest Service found that because of tremendous maintenance costs it is more cost effective to obliterate a road if it is not going to be used for the next twenty years. Many of these roads are already closed since they were built only for logging. These forests operate on a 120 year cycle. There forest service closed them because they aren't needed anymore. To leave them open you are ignoring the fact that they cost millions of dollars to maintain.