The appeal must be dismissed.
Petitioners are parents of students who attend high school in respondent's district.
In August 1995, petitioner Tenbus was informed by the high school guidance counselor that a graduate of the class of 1997 intended to graduate with the class of 1996 and that this would move her daughter Jessica's class ranking from first in the class to second. Consequently, petitioner Kraack's daughter Lacey, who was ranked second in the class, would lose her ranking of second and drop to third. At that meeting, petitioners raised concerns that the current class ranking system discouraged students from taking more advanced courses, since grades were not weighted by the course's degree of difficulty. This appeal ensued. Petitioners' request for interim relief pending a determination on the merits was denied on December 20, 1995.