A totally psychological version of morality is concocted in the document, as elsewhere. A person simply accepts church teaching, and God does everything else in the person's head. Morality as a path where things are done was not significantly described in the document. The natural law concept, with its related psychology, is in conflict with the characteristics of minds. Minds cannot have corners in them where something perfect is stored, while everything else in the mind is imperfect.
Minds integrate realities, values and attitudes.
This point and many others indicate that morality was created by God and does not have objective origins. And if it does not have objective origins, it supposedly cannot be determined through study. A large amount of rationalization of this point is produced in the document. One of the primary purposes of my moral philosophy is to develop the objective origins of morality. Apparently, the statement is an attempt at self-justification without regard for its accuracy.