Since all three petitions are devoid of merit, they are dismissed. In the first appeal petitioner complains that the superintendent defamed him in a letter to a resident of the district. In the second appeal, petitioner complains that the superintendent lied to him about the number of scorers used to grade an examination. Petitioner seeks review of the board's determinations that found the superintendent's actions proper. In essence, petitioner alleges that respondent Superintendent Colistra was untruthful concerning the various matters set forth in two of his petitions, and charges him with libel and slander in the third.
Petitioner seeks disciplinary action against the superintendent.
Respondents contend that the petitions should be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Respondents also assert that their actions were proper. The appeals must be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. As to petitioner's complaints against the board of education, it is impossible to discern from the petitions either the actions complained of or the remedy sought. Petitioner provides no evidence to support his claims that respondent Colistra was either dishonest or misleading.