Even so, there are rigid rules which apply . To legitimately clain the right to a particular coat of arms one must have documented proof of direct descendancy from the person to whom they were originally granted . I make no claim to the right to bear these arms .
Presentation here is only as a point of interest .
It is possible that there are some false representations, but is more probable that they are all incorrect . There could be an original granting with many variations granted to relatives of the original recipient . Arms granted to relatives were usually similar to the original with differences to indicate the relatioship . The arms presented here may or may not be the original . It would take extensive searching of the records with no guarantees to proving anything .