As a libertarian, I am hard pressed to classify myself as either. Government's role in the economy is, in my opinion, a hurtful thing in most cases. Therefore, I would agree with you that the use of these labels is not always appropriate. Naturally, as you already know, I disagree with other Libertarians about the governments role in abortion. I believe that the right to be born and have a shot at life is the most basic natural liberty of all human beings, and it is a crime against humanity to snuff that life out.
Government is way out of bonds when it says that killing another human being is alright.
Therefore, it is my conviction that government has a mandate to protect the life of infants just as it would the life of any adult - that the liberty to live and pursue happiness is the foundation of civilized coexistence and that this liberty should not be reserved for any specific caste, but for all humanity equally under laws that are established to promote living, not killing. With that said, I concede to your allegations that the use of these titles is not necessarily conducive to helping us in this discussion and could even be construed as counterproductive in this particular debate. I wouldn't necessarily agree with you if this were a debate about welfare reform, gun control, national security, or an economic issue. Next, let me address the harsh rhetoric and statements that you have referred to in your most recent response. I am interpreting your response as reflecting the fact that you were, at least mildly, offended by some of the wording that I have used in this debate.