Focus this year on IT in academic computing. Asks for protection of freedom to choose one's own tools. Consensus seems to be that principles are sound but names may need changing and some may be missing. Suggests putting costs on these. Says distinguish between the plan and projects.
Projects have costs.
The organization has evolved since this plan. OIT isn't ready for external review yet. Possibly but haven't considered that yet. Suggests WinNT 5 as an example. It would foster development of new technologies on campus, perhaps influence the development of these.