At such a time, public protest is an understandable feature of public discussion, and we believe that successive Guyanese governments have been very far-sighted in not merely respecting the constitutional right to protest, but in lending various forms of practical assistance in certain instances where groups of citizens have wished to express strong disagreement with decisions. The adoption of the Charter of Civil Society for the Caribbean Community can leave no Guyanese in any doubt that he is adequately protected in law and that adequate channels exist through which he can contribute to the decision-making process in our society. But citizens also have responsibilities. The most important of these, in a democratic society, is submission to the will of the majority, as expressed through the constitutional instruments which society has painstakingly created for that process. Governments have the right to expect civil obedience.
Governments have the right to be wrong and still be supported in their decisions.
No good, but only harm can result from the deliberate violation of civil law or deliberate disobedience to duly constituted agencies of civil authority. We believe that this is a principle which is endorsed by the vast majority of Guyanese and one which is capable of evoking an impressive response from them. The kind of society which Baha 'u'llah envisions emerging from the upheaval of the present age is one in which local government will have a far greater role than it does in virtually any present-day State. The reasons are, no doubt, sufficiently obvious as to need no elaboration. While we do not feel competent to comment on a subject which falls properly into the sphere of political action, we do believe that Guyana will be greatly benefited if specific attention is paid to the relative position of its municipalities in the system of things.