It is arguable about what should and should not be free speech. In a democratic society, such as the United States of America, there are often differences in opinion as to what the original intent of the framers of the U.S. Constitution were. This uncertainty becomes evident in matters relating to the first amendment, and if it was to be absolute in the provision for freedom of speech. If humans are to progress as a group, there has to be open dialogue. Although all speech is not acceptable, the first amendment of the United States Constitution allows one to freely express.
Freedom of expression is especially important as an overall educational forum.
This process can succeed only through openness, honesty and a tolerance for unpopular ideas and opinions, no matter how hateful or offensive. Therefore, if one has the right to speak freely, as allowed by the Constitution, there is not doubt that it is to be an unobstructed right. Compromising a person's right to free speech ultimately threatens the right of the minority views within our society. However, Supreme Court precedent has allowed free expression, but qualified it to avoid unjustly effecting the rights of others. Therefore, it is not the U.S. Constitution that limits free speech, but the agents that are to guard its precepts.