The FSF likes to equate Free Software with free speech. A right to Free Software would be the antithesis of freedom. To ensure it would require the forceful disclosure of all source code, by police force if necessary. But certain political rights do exist in reference to software. Freedom of speech is one of them.
People have the right to create and distribute their own software.
But just as freedom of speech guarantees one the right not to speak, it also gives proprietary software developers the right not to distribute their source code. Thus, to make Free Software a political right is to deny freedom of speech. Now let's look at the first definition. It's kind of vague, but there are many sub-definitions. Liberation from slavery or restraint or from the power of another .