When conventional examination cannot fully or correctly explain the patient s complaints, the VRT is highly indicative. It is superbly suited for the diagnosis of functional ailments and of clinically obscure, sub-clinical disorders. In severe clinical cases with perplexing differential diagnosis, the VRT can be of decisive help. It can lead to wide ranging diagnostic discoveries of utmost significance. The VRT is not, and cannot be, a substitute for conventional diagnostic procedures whenever they are indicated.
Experienced physicians face the dilemma off and on.
This is presumably due to the physical basis of the VRT, a diagnostic system that utilizes the phenomenon of biological resonance. Conventionally, they are treated with chemotherapeutics. Functional disturbances cannot be confirmed by conventional diagnostics. This often seems to be a justification for psychotherapeutic intervention. This, in most cases, is not productive.