To say that the others are clearly taught in the Bible begs the question. All sorts of heretics claim to believe the Bible while repudiating the Trinity-this, in fact, was precisely the position of the ancient Arians. Though Sproul does not at this point deny creedal Christianity, or come close to it, he leaves the reader with the distinct impression that he may be willing to do so if he were convinced that the Bible taught this. However, to alter one's views of a future physical Second Coming, resurrection of the just and the unjust, and the final judgment, is to restructure Christianity itself. We cannot alter these doctrines without altering Christianity, any more than we can alter the orthodox Trinity, or the two natures of Christ, without altering Christianity.
Protestants correctly hold that the Bible that is our sole authority is never uninterpreted.
As Philip Schaff observes, flowing out of the Bible itself is a godly, holy tradition which as the Christian Faith has been handed down for 2,000 years. In Charles Hodge's language, no one can reject any fundamental tenet of this Faith and be considered a Christian. Our principal calling is not to answer every cavil of skeptics, or to provide an absolute answer to dispensationalists and other eschatologically misled evangelicals. Our first calling is to defend the Holy Scriptures and the Faith. To a certain extent, Sproul's recent book does this, but it leaves too many questions unanswered and, in this reviewer's opinion, makes far too many concessions to heterodoxy-all, ironically, with the noble intention of fully answering skeptics of the Bible.