So I take credit for it in the sense that everything they re doing I either designed or agree with. Although not the greatest design, its content is very well edited. More importantly, they understand how things are supposed to work together, and that you can t just expect someone to start at the beginning of a text and go all the way through to the end. One of my corollary rules is that nobody reads anything. We usually just bounce around.
Good sites understand that dynamic.
Another site our group designed which has worked out well is MIT s Sloan School . We collaborated with a bunch of people there who really understand the Internet, so that helped a lot. It s partitioned for different audiences and well-organized. We also helped them project a sort of MIT-feel, which was important for them. Good design needs to support whatever metric of learning the educator wants to use.