It is what it is and it need not be altered. As far as I'm concerned, this artist can cover anything he wants with any kind of dung available and thus express his true being. Totally fine with me. I do however take exception to being forced to pay for this. It should never have been funded with my money in the first place, and as far as I'm concerned, the Mayor should pull funding.
Free expression is terrific.
So is free enterprise. If it really is a universal expression, then people tend to purchase art and include it in their environment. There is a mound of dung, representing a breast it seems, on the work. Something like that. So, if this is true, then the artist was using the dung in a very positive way.