A month after the article appeared, the protesters disrupted Sarich's anthropology course. None of them was a current student in the course, although some had taken it before, and others claimed they had read the verbatim transcript of the lectures Sarich offers as a study guide. The protesters attacked Sarich's stand on affirmative action and the content of his course. All of this naturally focused microscopic attention on the content of Sarich's Anthropology 1 course. Sarich lectures a good deal about both racial and sexual differences.
Higher risks means both winning and losing more often.
The most masculine men are rewarded with women and the most feminine are more likely to become homosexuals. In that form, many researchers can agree with the proposition. But Sarich takes it to extremes. Culture, while generally de-emphasized in Sarich's course, does play some role there. Some of Sarich's colleagues say many of his arguments don't hold water scientifically.