Wife's earnings from selling cosmetics had been minimal. The trial court set the matter for review in six months. The trial court's decision was based upon credible evidence, i.e., her doctor's opinion, and we find no abuse of discretion in its refusal to impute income to wife under these circumstances. Findings of Fact Not Supported By Evidence Husband contends that the trial court committed reversible error in its final decree when it corrected an error made in its letter opinion. A court speaks only through its written orders.
Evidence supports the trial court's adjustment.
Husband admits that the value set out in the final decree was proper and that he incurred no damage. Therefore, this argument is without merit. The trial court's final decree does not include the amount challenged by husband. Therefore, husband's contention is without merit. The account had no remaining funds as of the date of the hearing.