The philosopher has no longer any choice save between a metaphysical dogmatism and a metaphysical skepticism, both of which rest, at bottom, on the same postulate, and neither of which adds anything to positive science. Classicism's legacy Grundlage is a oneverse, a universe. Reality is not hypostatic, rather it is hypodynamic. Since Plato and Aristotle classicists have assumed a homogeneous analytic continuum of hypostases. They were and are wrong.
Reality is a heterogeneous stochastic ubiquity of hypodynamics.
All quantons are in Planck rate hypodynamis. In many cases, however, we feel the frame cracking . But as we did not begin by distinguishing between the inert and the living, the one adapted in advance to the frame in which we insert it, the other incapable of being held in the frame otherwise than by a convention which eliminates from it all that is essential, we find ourselves, in the end, reduced to regarding everything the frame contains with equal suspicion. To a metaphysical dogmatism, which has erected into an absolute the factitious unity of science, there succeeds a skepticism or a relativism that universalizes and extends to all the results of science the artificial character of some among them. For having wished to prevent all conflict between science and philosophy, we have sacrificed philosophy without any appreciable gain to science.