The debate between percentage and flat dollars is a persistent one in negotiations, and it is often resolved by a compromise in which both approaches are used. Normally, I would recommend such a mixed approach, but in view of the extreme economic circumstances, I recommend the flat dollar amount for this contract period, as it distributes scarce resources where they will have their most needed impact. I do not suggest this as a permanent approach, and the question will undoubtedly be revisited in the next negotiations. I understand that this is not an easy recommendation for teachers to accept, for it alters settled expectations based on previous patterns of increases. However, the current fiscal situation requires this different allocation of resources for the current contract term.
Payment is retroactive.
Top Step Differential There had been a practice of computing a top-step differential that augmented the salary increase for teachers at the high end of the salary scale. That top step differential was removed during the last contract, and the amount in question rolled into the teacher's base. Given the strong position of Oswego salaries at the top end of the salary scale, there is no reason to push those salaries higher through a top step differential. I recommend the continued elimination of the top step differential. In mediation the parties explored a formula for awarding a specified pool of funds among the positions in question on a mutually agreeable basis.