Thinking and acting end up in states that are what they should be, according to the laws of physics. There is no state resultant from thinking and acting that should be what it is not. Physicalism results in a contradiction between the laws of physics and the capacities of human thinking and acting. Human thinking and acting may result in states that could be what they are not. Human thinking and acting has the power to make things what they could not be under naturalist assumptions.
Miracles are both possible and actual.
My sense is that my terms could be clearer, but hopefully I've got the basic thinking right. I'm interested in shorter or more precise formulations, illustrations that could go along with the argument, and so on. References are good, too, if you have some. I wasn't able to trace the current thread back to its beginnings. I'm wondering if the arguments above can be salvaged from an 'unqualified predestination' view.