My review of the record reveals no evidence to support petitioner's contention that respondents are improperly using their office to require the employment of individuals in return for political support. The record merely contains bare assertions by petitioner, which are denied by the respondents. Petitioner's contention that respondents discontinued a swim program for political reasons is also not supported by any hard facts. Accordingly, petitioner has not presented any evidence of wrongdoing by respondents, and there is no basis to order respondents' removal. Petitioner also contends that respondents are guilty of violating the Open Meetings Law.
Respondents deny that allegation.
In any event, the Commissioner of Education lacks jurisdiction to address Open Meetings Law claims. I have reviewed petitioner's remaining contentions and find them without merit.