I guess I do. Your beliefs are based on paradigms that throughout history have fallen and fallen and fallen even though all people at the time believed them and experts expounded them without proof. Even when something is actually proven, the believers believe and still don't know the proof. Consensus is not proof. Proof is not decided by majority vote.
Policy based on beliefs are as easily right as they are wrong.
No, but I never said I did. I have questioned everything we just queried in my book, shown that the current paradigm is scientifically invalid and wrong, and presented an alternative hypothesis that is based on real science, is amenable to the scientific method, and fits real life addictions infinitely more than what is currently believed. You won't read my book. You won't debate the issues that differentiate your believed paradigm from my hypothesized paradigm. You can take the addiction out of the hypoic, but you can't take the Hypoism out of the addict.