That was done quite well by Thomas Aquinas in the 13th century. Philosophical analysis is a way of clarifying terms, concepts, and propositions. But Wittgenstein eschewed the idea that philosophy results in theories. Philosophy simply puts everything in front of us but it does not explain or deduce anything. Seeing more should result in the disappearance of philosophical problems.
Philosophy has the tools for the solution of philosophical problems at hand.
The way to understand the meaning of a word is to consider it within the language-game to which it belongs. To understand the meaning of a word, then, is very much like understanding an action which does not make sense until one notices what the act does and, then, realize what the action is for, what its purpose is, and what meaning it has. The language-game in which a word is used is critical in understanding the meaning of the word. Language itself is a comprehensive form of life combining the most diverse elements according to rules which are flexible and varied. And I generally agree with his analysis.