While it is possible to start untangling this knot, this is neither the time or place. If one really wants to answer a question, one must state it scientifically. One must develop a theory or state an observation in such a way that its truth can be verified through experiment or observation. This should not be read to imply all philosophy and religion are worthless. If Aristotle had not conjectured about dropping two balls, Galileo might not have thought to perform the experiment.
Philosophy is valid as a spawning ground of new sciences.
Unprovable conjecture argued without provable evidence is not entirely worthless or meaningless, but the objective ought to be to state one's theory or thought in an objective and realistic enough way that one can examine nature or perform an experiment to prove the theory. Nor do I automatically reject religious thought, religious truths, religious thinkers. In laying the base values for my beliefs, I created a web page that featured the Declaration of Independence, the Gettysburg Address, and the I Have a Dream speech. Between them, a lot is said about what America ought to be, and how America should face crisis and awakening. Yet all three contain references to God, were written by believers, and in part were written to further His perceived Will.