Entropie is a kind of negefficiency, or negative specificity. Well, of course, energy use efficiency relates to just how particular informational constraints in a given locale are reduced, and how, as variables in equations of state, they relate to each other. But to get at effort we need to map H to, in my opinion, the rapidity of interpretation. We would like to say that the efficiency of interpretation decreases as the rapidity of its formation increases. That is to say, singularity of interpretation should be hampered by an increase in possible interpretations as the speed of interpretation increases.
Efficiency here is mapped to accuracy.
As an energetic system is more efficient, it more accurately applies available energy to its work. As effort increases, more available energy is utilized per unit time, AND proportionally more of it is dispersed in directions unrelated to the work at hand, showing that negefficiency has increased. Just as entropie involves both the given arrangements of material configurations AND the speed of energy utilization, so H involves both the equivocation generated by the source and the noise accrued in the process of interpretation, which should increase with haste. I conclude that, as entropie is negefficiency, so H is a bonafide entropy. Since activities would likely be strenuous in a situation not designed for them, the lack of perfect context seems basic.