All arguments state a contradiction to an opinion. Philosophers debate truth primarily in the arena of text. A human in nature has a condition, this condition is described with less ambiguity when the practitioners of discourse use numbers, and the applicable rules of mathematics. Mathematical systems are considered the least abstract of our representations of truth. Yet even in math, our most precise arrangement of symbols, lurks the likelihood of distortion.
Letters are variable, numbers are constant.
Yet a digital semantic exists. English homonyms and a floating context gives rise to ambiguity in discourse. Likewise, math is subject to measures of estimation, which will never be absolute. A square with a side of one length unit, has an area of one squared. A line bisecting the square from A to C forms a diagonal with length root two.