The difficulty is that there are just about no links between the people, owners of the right to peace, and the nations, legal providers of the peace. It is therefor urgent, or at least logical for us humans, individually and as a whole, to find other ways than violence or force to tackle problems. The human right to peace is a solution, and it seems in itself to be very reliable one, not only because it has the capacity to overcome brute force, but also because it can do this with understanding and not with force. I do not really believe peace to be only something you can breach or neglect, for which you can be punished. Still, I see peace as a full time process, as a natural as well as willed part of all human activities.
Peace is an active and permanent creation, in everyone's mind, and in all our relations.
Again, peace is a culture. Therefor the human right to peace can well fit in the traditional procedures used to protect human rights, and it should, but it is not only that. Slowly courts will progress and recognize this right. The international criminal court will have to take a position on the question, sooner or later. But the human right to peace is also an example, a daily practice and overcoming of the traditional and vertical vision of human rights.