In the case of school or other supplementary feeding programs, this phenomena appears to simply not occur. The common practice of reallocating household resources away from the intended recipients of government programs is a major consideration for policymakers planning a variety of household interventions. This study finds consistent evidence that supplementary feeding programs do benefit their targets, in this case, children. Whereas households can be expected to reallocate resources in other types of interventions, this is not the case for child feeding programs. Download full-text discussion paper .
Proper citation is required.