We certainly can have some glimpse of the larger purposes of the process. If the process is natural and rational, then the creation of rational beings is part of its overall motion. The question is whether there are any rational reasons to adopt or accept such a view of nature. This way of looking at it gives us hope that understanding the larger picture will lead to understanding of our selves and of ethical help. We are looking in the wrong direction.
Nature is inert, inactive, static.
We, with our subjectivity, and our concerns for goodness, justice, and beauty, cannot be thought of as part of nature. We drop out of the now scientific picture. We start to think about science as how things are, while the humanities give us only feelings. So science becomes good, ethics bad. This is a question that you have to ultimately answer on your own, however, we can say that much of the proof has been given in the description and explanation above.