That's a losing proposition. We don't sell encryption chips. But encryption is about free speech, and the inability to encrypt something means that government is violating your free speech. It means that it wants to force you to allow it to eavesdrop. Also, from an economic point of view, it's colossally stupid.
Encryption happens to be available worldwide.
This phobia the Justice Department has with encryption, all it does is hurt American computer companies and allow our foreign competitors to take markets we otherwise could have taken. Janet Reno is one of the most anti-freedom people that's ever been in her position. The fact that a person that has done the horrendous things she has done would also be against free speech and also against a lot of other freedoms doesn't surprise me on bit. This is one that I had trouble with for a long time. It, in effect, is a reduction in taxes, and it's difficult to argue against that.