That is, I'm torn on how to vote on this thing. And the Court of Appeals has laid out a test on what is an appropriate constitutional amendment, and the test is if there are two or more things that voters would want to vote on separately, it cannot be considered as a constitutional amendment, and therefore would be invalid. Now, as you saw, it won't come into play until after the thing is passed. I don't think that's necessarily a slam-dunk on this one either. You can argue you're talking about federal deductibility on state income taxes and both of them pertain to that.
Nothing is ever a slam-dunk.
Or a silver stake. But it seems to me there are clearly two separate provisions, and if the courts are serious about that sort of thing, that is something they may want to look at. I'm sure the opponents will make an issue of it. I think it probably does lay a foundation. But to go back to your original question, I was surprised as it hit the papers and you talked to the various camps, there was a lot of agreement that voters aren't going to look at this over forged signatures.