What surprised me was testimony and theory from the experts and scientists working on this stuff. They actually consider this an evolutionary leap for humankind, and said as much. I look at it as something physiological, something one's offspring would necessarily be born with and could not lose except by the further evolution or digression of succeeding generations.
Nonbiological change is still change.
Perhaps, then, to avoid confusion, a new term should be chosen. We already use it for other areas of technology. What surprised me was testimony and theory from the experts and scientists working on this stuff. They actually consider this an evolutionary leap for humankind, and said as much. I look at it as something physiological, something one's offspring would necessarily be born with and could not lose except by the further evolution or digression of succeeding generations.