The appeal must be dismissed.
Petitioners are residents of the district and members of a taxpayers organization.
The recommendations included extending voting hours, providing seating for the elderly and infirm and additional inspectors, and changing the absentee ballot form. Respondent board president promised that the recommendations would be taken under advisement. The recommendations were never implemented. Instead, respondent added a third voting booth to diminish voting delays. Petitioners allege that respondent failed to implement their recommendations, improperly handled absentee ballots, failed to correctly advertise the annual meeting and permitted electioneering in the classroom.