If you say so,please research her testimony. She passed away,and nobody can ask her again. Anyway,regardless of whether her testimony was true or not, her testimony doesn't prove that the army had abducted women. Their cases are so strange. It happened more than 50 years ago.
People sometimes forget.
I don't care about misunderstanding of the exact name of the places or exact date. Abducted by the army or not is a very important matter when they demand Japanese government compensations. So,I say that their testimonies are not always trustworthy. Well,I guess,they have their own reasons. They are accusing the government at the trial.