He is a nice enough man. The other day, I even had dinner with him. But he, like countless others, would like me to do a rain dance around the major weapon our enemy employs against those who dig for the truth - and not try to wrestle it out of his hands. There is little doubt to me that academic, 'mainstream historians' will indeed be forced to re-examine the 'holocaust'. Actually it would be more correct to say 'examine' rather than 're-examine', since it appears they haven't looked at it in the first place.
Revisionists can certainly take credit for forcing their hands.
Alleged crime scenes and alleged weapons must be assessed using technical, not emotional methods. The Nazis did not possess different laws of science. There must be a discussion of this so called 'anti-semitism', which openly examines the responsibility of the Jews and their behavior. To assume that somehow National Socialism had no areas of legitimacy is inherently biased against the Germans - and by extension all of 'goyim'. It is this constant yielding and deference to Jewish interests that has enabled the 'holocaust' myth to become the fraud that it is.