To infer an intention to act upon the thoughts and dreams from this language would stray far beyond the bounds of the First Amendment, and would amount to punishing Baker for his thoughts and desires. Count IV must be dismissed . D. Count V charges Baker and Gonda with transmitting a threat to injure. It is based on an exchange between Gonda and Baker on December 11-12, 1994. If not next week.
Pickings are better then too.
Although it's more crowded. The class of potential targets, as discussed with regard to Count IV, is far too vague. Like his earlier statements, this language indicates a desire to do something. Baker next indicates, at most, an intention to meet Gonda at some indefinite point in the future - in the next week, month, or several months later. This statement does not express an unequivocal intention immediately to do anything.