Discuss whether the court has subject matter jurisdiction of each of the claims. Question IX P sues L in Iowa federal court. P's suit alleges that the framulator, a component of the lawnmower manufactured by L, malfunctioned, causing P injury. F, the manufacturer of the framulator, is located in New Jersey. L wants the case moved to New Jersey.
L makes a motion to transfer the case to federal court in New Jersey.
The judge denies the motion, ruling that L is not entitled to a transfer because the federal court in New Jersey would not have personal jurisdiction over L, and because the balance of hardships and convenience tips in favor of the Iowa forum. Identify the issues the court of appeals will have to rule on, and the standard of review it should apply.