She also requests an order expunging from her son's record any reference to disciplinary action taken in response to actions committed by him on or about March 24, 1993. The application must be denied. Neither the petition nor the answer provides a clear picture of the events which are the basis of this appeal. The record is very confusing at this point, but seems to indicate that a hearing was scheduled, adjourned twice at petitioner's request and eventually held on April 26, 1993. Petitioner alleges that she requested that the hearing be adjourned a third time because of a medical problem, and that her request was denied.
Respondents deny that petitioner requested a third adjournment.
In any event, petitioner and her son did not appear at the hearing. The findings and recommendation of the hearing officer were adopted by respondent Thompson on that same day. Petitioner contends that the hearing was improperly conducted since she and her son were not able to attend. Petitioner also denies that her son was disruptive on the day in question. Petitioner further maintains that respondents should be removed from their positions because they did not respond to petitioner's telephone calls.