He finds that the asymmetry is neither of thermodynamic nor of anthropocentric origin and views this as a genuine difficulty. According to this interpretation the Projection Postulate must be regarded as a law of nature . While granting that there are time symmetric alternatives to this, I still wonder what Price has in mind when he deems this a problem. If so, this seems a terribly strong claim to sustain. I find the argument of Chapter 5 unconvincing.
Price begins by claiming that there are conflicting intuitions in contemporary physics.
The TRI and determinism of classical physics imply that there are as many preinteractive as postinteractive correlations between particles. But according to the latter interpretations, there exists a non-TRI law of nature, e.g., the Projection Postulate. Innocence is either true due to the existence of non-TRI basic laws or it is false due to the TRI of the laws. Price wants to undermine Bell's Theorem by denying the temporally asymmetric assumption known as Independence and claiming that hidden parameters in the future may determine the results of our present measurements. I'm not sure anyone holds.