Order books by Michael Martin now. However, as I will show, Jones' argument for his main thesis that non-Christian worldviews destroy the possibility of knowledge rests on unsound arguments and confusions. In addition, it contains false implications and leads to inconsistencies.
Human knowledge is possible.
Hence, the Christian view of reality is true. Non-Christians would have no problem in accepting the validity of this argument, i.e. accepting that if the premises were true, then the conclusion would be true. The question is not, then, the validity of the argument but its soundness, i.e. whether the premises are true. First, if Jones' argument is sound, the Christian worldview is true. But there is excellent reason to suppose that it is false.