It is from the observance of such laws that Nato derives its claim to moral superiority over men like Milosevic and Saddam Hussein and its right to sit in judgment on them. Once you throw that thought away, rather an important baby disappears down the plughole. I ask because it would be nice to know how we are to judge which of the 30 or 40 armed conflicts that rage around the world at any moment in which we might get involved on this unilateral basis. Of course it is irksome to have to persuade one's fellow states, many of whom act out of ignoble motives. The Guardian News Service.
Power is enough.
The Roman Empire had no need for diplomacy. Ghali Perhaps the fact that NATO was able to conduct the illegal war against Yugoslavia may be the undoing to those nations that allowed themselves to be used toward that end. Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.