However, when making a decision such as this one must consider what is right, regardless of their desires. Physician-assisted suicide very well might not be motivated by right reason, which Kant demanded, but rather just as a quick and convenient means to achieve death. This act does not hold a pure respect of the law, society, or anyone, and as a family member I'd have a duty to disapprove. Insurance Companies View Within Deontology Business's experience a very strange form of deontological theory. The business obligation, according to Friedman, is to generate profit for its owners.
Profit is a consequence of immediate action.
Deontology forces us to focus on duties, thus forcing serious business issues to be raised by Physician-Assisted Suicide. Insurance companies have the duty to somewhat guide the cost of medicine to maximum monetary efficiency, as this both serves customers who need affordable medicine and owners who require profit. But as Yale Kamisar, professor of law at Harvard University noted, patient duress can lead to non-consensual behavior. This is a legal minefield none of us would wish to cross. A single wrongful death suit could invoke tremendous punitive damages by the judicial system, to say nothing of the nightmare from the court of public opinion.