If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, looks like a duck etc it is a duck. Bohm's quantum pilot field of non-Shannon information has all the properties we need for a mental process. It gives numbers that agree with experience. This is all one can properly expect from a theory. Only if he looks like his statues.
Numbers can be made to prove many opinions, just consider opinion polls.
When you write about material correlates to consciousness , this is something quite different. My interest is not QM per se but the claim of some particle physicists that they have something to say about consciousness . Objective science of all types, and including QM, is a differentiation inside subjective experience. This is a physical immaterial postulate that shows new connections of mind to cosmos and allows us IMO to build a new kind of naturally conscious artificial intelligence in the solid-state using nanotechnology. That's good enough for me.