Whether the condition satisfies these criteria will depend upon the facts of each individual case. Such a condition is not necessarily constitutional in each and every case. See discussion supra. We also note that the dress and hair code appears only to be applied to male probationers. You do not ask, and we do not address, whether the fact that the dress and hair code is not applied to female probationers implicates male probationers' equal protection rights under the state or federal constitution.
None develops a general analytical framework.
In that case, the court concluded that the term that probationers not demonstrate at an abortion clinic did not impermissibly infringe upon their right to free expression under the state and federal constitutions because the restriction was intended to protect the victim and increase the likelihood that the probationers would successfully complete their probation terms.