Even if we began such a program, it would be impossible to sustain it. Testing is expensive. Consumer Reports is sold for a very low price to millions of consumers. Our journal Health Devices, which deals with medical equipment, is received by several thousand hospitals at a substantially greater price. We don't believe the scientific community is willing to share the cost of having such information available.
Federal agencies are very unlikely to pay for such studies.
Our experience is that, on the rare occasion when they do, the reports are gutted to avoid offending industry. Absolutely not, in our view. If such a program is not independent, operating at arm's length from producers, its objectivity and fairness cannot be ensured. No product-testing program that accepts money from producers of the goods being tested has ever developed and maintained an effective reputation for integrity and objectivity. In short, you can't get there from here.