Perhaps the most important argument against miracles was formulated by the 18th century Scottish philosopher, David Hume. Most scholars believe that Hume s essay, Of Miracles, dealt a fatal blow to belief in miracles. Contemporary arguments against miracles are often variants of Hume s ideas. A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence. The laws of nature are supported by uniform experience.
Miracles violate the laws of nature.
Therefore, miracles are disproven. If this argument seems a bit flimsy, it is. For one thing, Hume s argument depends heavily on the second claim. In fact, the second claim is very suspicious. Throughout history, many people have reported witnessing miracles, i.e., violations of the laws of nature.