Links with a right-facing blue arrow will take you off this site.
Little research exists regarding the sexual impact of infant circumcision on men.
A 1966 study by Masters and Johnson 1 sought to disprove a then-common myth that the circumcised glans was more sensitive than the glans of an intact penis. Their limited study, however, tested only for exteroceptive and light tactile discrimination on the ventral and dorsal sides of the penile shaft and glans. New research has determined that nearly all of the fine-touch receptors in the penis are in the ridged band of the foreskin. There are virtually no fine touch receptors in the penile glans 3 and the only part of the male body with less fine-touch receptivity than the glans is the heel of the foot. Their research is not useful for determining differences in penile sensibility between circumcised and intact men.