The appeal must be dismissed. The charges alleged that respondent was guilty of improper physical contact with four female students. The charges further indicated that the identity of the students would be supplied to respondent or his attorney upon written request. Respondent moved to dismiss the charges, alleging that failure to set forth the identity of the students rendered the charges not sufficiently specific to enable him to adequately prepare a defense and denied him due process of law.
Petitioner seeks an order annulling the chairperson's determination and reinstating the charges.
The record indicates that subsequent to the decision of the chairperson, petitioner redrafted the charges with the names of the students supplied. The amended charges were served on respondent and the proceeding is in progress. In light of those events, it is apparent that no purpose is served by the reinstitution of the original charges, and this appeal is moot.