I'll be renumbering invalid rules with incrementing roman numerals, to ensure that we have a unique reference for each which does not conflict with the numbering for valid ones. I can live with that. Hmmm, yes, what fun for me. The ability of one's AI to 'encapsulate one's destiny' seems a bit compromised if it can fluctuate so. Once a person's AI is known, it cannot be changed.
Every rule has a number.
This rule's number is 17. I see no problems here. The validity of this rule hinges on two questions. The second question is whether the names of all FRC members can be similarly resolved such that each evaluates to a unique value of 567,845 or less. While any one or two of these assumptions might not be unreasonable, the product of their combined probabilities is sufficiently unlikely as to no longer strike me as being a reasonable assumption.