If we take this attitude, we must lose interest in our own selves. Nothing, in fact, matters. Fourthly, if you get Shakespeare wrong, then you get the whole Elizabethan Age wrong. You are lead into wild errors about the nature of the society. If Shaksper of Stratford had behaved like that, he would not have have lasted a minute.
Genius is a non-explanation.
The Stratfordians rely on this empty word as a complete solution to the problems created by Shaksper's lack of adequate training, education or experience. Nothing could be more absurd than to suggest that Love's Labor's Lost, Richard II or Romeo and Juliet were among the first work of any playwright. No writer has ever crawled out from under a hedge, pen in hand, ready to write good literature, let alone the greatest of all time. Once you realise that the orthodox story is hollow at the centre, you will see that it makes far more sense to find the person who had such abilities, identify his early work, see how he developed and try to understand how his plays and poems both reflect and illuminate his life. The short answer is, no, thank you, we aren't.