FAQs Please note that, where applicable, links have been provided to original texts which these letters address. Also, your thoughts may be sent via the online Letters to the Editor section.
Excerpts appear here.
You may also obtain a copy by writing to Stone at Hauser 400, Harvard Law School, Cambridge 02138. Stone seems to have been seduced by a narrow view of science as utterly rational and objective, such as can be found in statistical analyses and double-blind studies. Concerning Freud's view of himself, as with so much in the article, Stone is simply wrong. A neuroanatomical scientist, trained in the tradition of Helmholtz, Freud hoped to understand the biology of the mind through clinical investigation. One portion of Stone's criticism is valid.