But I ve finally concluded that in transportation, the only philosophy that allows a decisionmaker to make a decision is intrinsic security. Not for technological reasons. This way the decisionmakers are covered. He seems to have come to the conclusion that we should be able to control every aspect of a technological creation such as Aramis because the decisionmakers don't want to be blamed and therefore be held liable for accidents that kill people. This ties us into the notion of liability.
Liability arises out of the lack of individuals who are willing to take responsibility.
We seem to forget that accidents are precisely those events that are unexpected, seemingly by chance and cannot be controlled. I choose to live in the reality where people are good and we'll catch those who are not than expecting everyone to be controlling, blaming, and irresponsible. It transforms people's opinions of it into 'simple' points of view about an object that remains independent of them. With Aramis there is nothing of the sort. Since it does not exist, it cannot unify points of view.