A careful distinction should be made in regard to the teaching profession. The rights of the majority of parents not to have homosexuality advocated as a life style takes priority over the rights of a group of homosexuals to use the classroom as a form of propaganda for their way of life. The advocacy of which I speak does not have to be pedagogical but simply the public living of a life style. On the other hand, a man or woman who has been involved in homosexual practices secretly should not be forced out of one's teaching position as the result of private investigations. Such witchhunting which often times involves blackmail should not be allowed to destroy a person's reputation.
Housing is a more difficult issue.
Theoretically, it would seem that a person could hold that two unmarried people, or two people living in adultery, should not be allowed to rent one's apartment, but in practice this could be very difficult to apply, since our prevailing mores are so lax in these matters. The analogy carries over to the problem of homosexual housing. For the most part homosexuals who live together try to keep it secret or, at least, do not admit it. The minority of homosexual activitists usually live in a specific area of the city so as to be part of the subculture, and thus do not disturb their heterosexual brothers and sisters. For this reason, in light of our present knowledge of the situation, I would tend to avoid advocacy of civil laws restricting the housing rights of homosexuals on balance, it would do more harm than good.