The evolutionary tree, branching from the amoebae into the most complex animals and humans, is based upon assumptions, not fossil records. In reality, there is not one iota of evidence that points towards such a tree. The amoeba is a modern organism with as long an evolutionary history as any other extant creature, which tells you how much the writer knows about what he's saying. Here's a branching point in the tree for you, based on fossil evidence. I can only conclude that the writer is lying again.
Evolutionists ignore the fact that they rely on circular reasoning.
All of the support for the theory comes from the fossil record, and the dates. Therefore, the geological column is based on evolution, and evolution is based on the geological column. When dating a fossil, it is dated by the time period of the stone it is fossilized in. The geological column predates evolutionary theory, so it is not based on any evolutionary assumptions. The process is rather more complicated.