In the description of the author, it does not state that he is one of Jehovah's Witnesses. This book picks out three books critical of the New World Translation to refute. Considering the author's claims of providing an objective analysis, it is surprising that he attempts to refute books that are critical of the New World Translation. On pages XV and 45, he states that translation is interpretation. Again on page 31, he states, Idiomatic translations convey words that represent the interpretations of the translators.
Literal translations convey concepts that the readers can interpret.
But this is a two-edged sword. The New World Translation of Eph. To it alone God's Sacred Word, the Bible, is not a sealed book. For this reason, the Bible cannot be properly understood without Jehovah's visible organization in mind. One glaring deficiency in this book is no discussion of the concepts of 'marked' and 'unmarked' meanings of words.