This was a major reversal of British policy, which had always insisted that NATO be the exclusive institution for the common defense in the Atlantic area. The EU's motivation for CFSP, too, is clear, and frequently stated. But the French are not the only ones. We were right to take those positions. The key issue before us today, however, is whether the form that this new EU enterprise is taking will enhance or complicate the unity of the Atlantic Alliance.
European statements are ambiguous, to put it charitably.
But it must also be capable of conducting such action on its own if it wishes. It must therefore have its own arrangements for the provision of advice, analysis and military leadership, which it currently lacks. Defence Ministers must play a direct role, and they must be able to meet as and when the need arises. A military committee is indispensable, and it should be able to work through a sufficiently high-level European general staff. This EU effort to construct a separate European defense identity comes three years after NATO adapted its own procedures to recognize and promote a European Security and Defense Identity within the Alliance framework.