The federal government is satisfied that the court will have representation from all relevant points of view in the matter. The case, R obert Libman v. Attorney General of Quebec, arises from the 1992 referendum on the Charlottetown constitutional Accord. Robert Libman, former leader of Quebec's Equality Party, contends that the Quebec referendum law violates constitutional guarantees of freedom of speech and association in Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Yes or No umbrella committees. Minister Rock pointed out that there are a number of other cases before the courts dealing with issues relevant to Canada's future.
Individuals are free to pursue any legal avenues they consider appropriate.
In some cases, the federal government may feel that it can be of assistance to the court, or it may see a need to present its own view.