Because of his decision, he became one of the cult figures in the history of philosophy, a man of intact moral integrity who had made his final decision according to the very same principles that guided his entire life. Contrary to this widely accepted myth, I will try to demonstrate that Socrates' argument was erroneous, which made his decision less rational. In fact, had he decided to escape, his behavior would not have represented an unjust act. Although his argumentation and dialogue with Crito seem more like a moral sermon, his ideas are based on some deeper philosophical problems. Lawbreaking is unjust, while observance of laws is just, because 2.
Laws are just.
The laws of Athens are just, even if the legitimacy of laws in general can be questioned. Judicial decisions made on the basis of those laws are just. When finally pronounced, judicial decisions must be carried out. Disrespect of judicial decisions produces the destruction of laws. Escape from prison is an unjust and therefore morally unacceptable act.