I would therefore reverse the circuit court's award of summary judgment on the basis that there is nothing in the record showing that Anthem made such offers of proof. Because the analytical approach taken by the majority only compounds fundamental errors already evident in this Court's past treatment of this subject, I concur only in the basic result reached in this case. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Harvey v. Travelers Indem. Bass v. State Farm Mut.
Majority slip op.
There is no textual support for this construction, and one may only surmise that it was chosen to be consistent with Deel .