This is more a language issue than an application issue, and was not considered important. From the audience usage of terminology was criticized - terms like schemes, classes, attributes, values and others are seemingly used without clear definition. This must be cleaned up. Input will be provided to the authors of the application draft. In the current state, the application draft will not be submitted to IESG because it could not yet be tested on fresh people in practice.
Main objectives are data origin authentication, data origin integrity, and data privacy.
All of this should be supplied as simply as possible. It contains the public key of this maintainer. The object as a whole is signed. An issue is the initial verification of the maintainer to get the process started. Data privacy is still an open question.