It is not made of points, only of lines. It is a rhizome. It is a stasis discourse. The problem, of course, is that the universe itself is perpetually opposed to stasis. And the situation is even worse than a simple mis-description.
Language is a force.
Nouns effect an incorporeal transformation on unique multiplicities that restricts flux and creates stasis. Stasis-nouns are deadly, in that they effectively kill the vital and unique energies of unique multiplicites by forcing them together into a group in which they may not belong and to which they may not be attached, thus shutting down the available lines of flight of a given multiplicity. The Deleuzo-Guattarian response to this problem is the haecceity. It acknowledges that everything is in a constant state of flux, composed of speeds and affects, not forms and subjects. It makes no sense to speak of things in terms of stasis.