Obviously, the cost was higher, but the projected benefits were substantially higher, too. The core lesson that this example taught us is that how money is spent is at least as important as how much is expended. Building on the example above, the school could have spent its resources traditionally by using remedial math services. However, using a non-traditional approach yielded learning at a higher level of depth, at a faster rate of acquisition, and with a greater degree of generalization. While our observations in this regard are highly specific to special programs we have observed, we strongly believe there are implications for use of multidisciplinary programs in regular education, especially at the secondary level.
Introduction Begin with the end in mind.
Fit programs to students, not students to programs. Organizational culture and structure count. Multidisciplinary instruction is extraordinarily difficult, but well worth the effort. Meaningfully involved families are assets, not liabilities. Improving regular education reduces special education expenditures.