However, the Court concluded that the Charter and a bilateral treaty relied on by Pakistan do not contain any specific provision of itself conferring compulsory jurisdiction on the Court. Notwithstanding its rejection of jurisdiction, the Court reminded both parties that the international obligations which they have undertaken still require that they seek a peaceful settlement of their disputes in good faith, including in particular the dispute arising out of the aerial incident of August 10, 1999. The purpose of ASIL Insights is to provide concise and informed background for developments of interest to the international community. The American Society of International Law does not take positions on substantive issues, including the ones discussed in this Insight. Insights may be found on the ASIL Web Site .
Educational copying is permitted with due acknowledgement.