He attacks unrestricted free trade, for instance. Admittedly, Frank is entitled to disagree with every single economist who has won the Nobel prize. Yet he should respect his readers enough to give them a considered counter-argument, which he doesn't. Frank offers no ideas for ways for readers to defend themselves against the media dogma he dislikes. What's most infuriating about Frank is that he could do so much better.
Liberalism needs every good writer it can find.
Sadly, Frank seems more interested in crafting sentences to prove to people that he is not a fool. Note the snigger, the distancing, the mock exaggeration, the proof that the speaker is not a fool. If you like sentences like that, you'll like this book. But if you like carefully considered critique of today's culture, you'll have to look elsewhere.