But perhaps I'm biased. Academic language is, I guess, supposed to be exact and neutral, a sort of mathematics of ideas, with information recorded in a complete and explicit manner, the record formulated into theories, and attempts made to prove those formulae valid or not. And few scholars would care to have their usages so viewed, myself excluded. And that's what's wrong with a project of this ilk. The more ridiculous neologisms and euphemistic expressions are shunned.
Levity is attempted.
Then there is petitio princippi, begging the question, the logical fallacy of assuming as true that which is to be proven. Which is why the earth is populated by only a few dozen people, all wearing Mardi Gras costumes. Fallacious disregard tor the truth is habitual in Guidelines. Never mind that a feminine rhyme, with its extra unaccented syllable, is, in fact, lame. In hopes that St. Nicholas soon would be thereing.