State ex rel. St. L. Publ. Co. v. Pub. V of the Constitution does not affect 64.120 and, therefore, the reviewing court on certiorari may hear and consider evidence in addition to that before the board. State ex rel.
Evidence is viewed in light most favorable to the findings of the commission.
Method of review prescribed in 89.110 was not abrogated by Art. V 22 of the constitution and requirement that petition for review be presented to court within thirty days after decision filed by board is mandatory and jurisdictional and extrajudicial statement of counsel of board, if made, that he would notify protestants of final decision could neither modify statute nor invalidate lawfully made order of the board. State ex rel. Suspension of city liquor license after hearing sustained as against contention that provision in statute requiring licensee to request recording of proceedings at his own expense is violative of 22 of Article V of the Constitution since that requirement is valid. State ex rel.