For humans that figure is a little above that. These differences are so profound that microbiologists may have to adopt new methods for their research. But that assumption may be about to topple. If it turns out that these unique genes have important functions and can t be altered without harming the organism, this would be a major blow to Darwinism. As we saw earlier, Darwinian evolution works by accumulating small genetic changes.
Large jumps are anathema because they are too improbable and look too much like miracles.
Each gene, then, had to be crafted one small step at a time. But if a gene can tolerate little or no change, there can be no line of evolutionary predecessors. The reason you probably haven t heard about this is because evolutionary biologists, driven by Darwinist assumptions, have jumped to the conclusion that these genes evolved very quickly so quickly that they bear no resemblance to any predecessor genes. One example of this is a recent study reported in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The study examined certain proteins found on the outer coating of mammal s eggs.