His editor has the job of making the right rite copy right before the copyright would be right. Then it might be copy good copyright. Should Thom Wright decide to write, then Wright might write right rite, which Wright has a right to copyright. Copying that rite would copy Wright's right rite, and thus violate copyright, so Wright would have the legal right to right the wrong. Legals write writs which is a right or not write writs right but all writs, copied or not, are writs that are copyright.
Judges make writers write writs right.
Advertisers write copy which is copyright the copy writer's company, not the right of the writer to copyright. Wrongfully copying a right writ , a right rite or copy is not right. Shelley Herman S.P.E.B.S.Q.S.A., Whittier Chapter. Adapted and Appended by Scott Simmerman. I didn't say that I didn't say it.