When the Clintons and their servitors raise the decibel level of their attacks on perceived enemies, something momentous is about to happen in the office of the Independent Counsel. The Independent Counsel's office is deciding on who to indict and when. Thus the Clinton machine is spreading its most desperate smears. There has not been any witness tampering. The witness in question, David Hale, gave his story to Jeff Gerth of the New York Times among other reporters weeks before he encountered anyone from The American Spectator , which, according to the Clintonites, paid Hale for his testimony, a charge that we deny.
Hale too denies receiving money.
In point of fact, he has never changed his story, and his story was not as important in earlier successful prosecutions of the Clintons' associates as the documents that the Independent Counsel presented to the jury. The Clintons know that Independent Counsel Starr is mulling over an indictment of Hillary Clinton and several lesser figures. They worry over the mounting evidence that the president has lied about illegal loans and sexual encounters in his office. Both he and Mrs. Clinton may be subject to charges of perjury, conspiracy to obstruct justice, and, at least in one case, suborning perjury. Within the Independent Counsel's office there is apparently debate about whether to indict Hillary.