One would have to assume, after reading the editorials, that there is no dissent on the question of origins except by wild-eyed fundamentalists. Nowhere do the editorial writers even acknowledge that prominent and well qualified critics exist. The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution . Behe's challenge to Dawkins is nowhere mentioned. Isn't that convenient.
Evolution is the history of life.
That's all there is to it. Unbelievable and wrong. Evolution is more properly defined as one species randomly and accidentally transforming itself into another completely different species without regard to design considerations. Given this definition, there is absolutely no evidence for evolution. These are bacteria and viruses that have acquired in a very short time more poisonous properties or greater resistance to medicine's most powerful antibiotics.