It is a significant examination running to 27 pages of thorough analysis. I will tell you the result now. Adjudication is innocent, acquitted of all charges. It has nothing to do with human rights. The judge explained that article 6 of the convention only applies to legal proceedings in tribunals.
Legal proceedings result in a judgment or order that in itself can be enforced.
If the decision at the end of legal proceedings is that money should be paid, a judgment is drawn up that can be enforced. That is not the case with an adjudicator. The language of the 1996 act throughout is that the adjudicator makes a decision. He does not make a judgment. Proceedings before an arbitrator are closer to court proceedings because an award of an arbitrator can in some circumstances be registered and enforced without a judgment of the court.