There are three strands of argument used to construct a formulation of desert. Explain all three. Discussing the use of private anger to play on the juries emotions 2. Explain why it was a requirement of the prosecutors to show an honest interest in and to rouse public anger for the act committed. Describe the male and female accepted outlits for anger.
Litigants strive to invoke a social memory and ignite the anger and emotions of the jury.
When using this strategy consistently, orators could effectively secure judicial procedure on the accused. Law was upheld when orators used supporting evidence of past occurrences as a form of informative but nonbonding precedent, and created the framework of equivalencies for dispensing anger. Written law, in fact, help set up the public economy of anger. Athenians as persuasive and a non-binding force within an Athenian court interpreted Law. No unnecessarily painful deaths.