New Hampshire Ave. I agree with Cordaro that this review should culminate in one last open session at which public comments on the draft may be presented to the Commission. This is only fair. Failure to do this would be correctly perceived by the consuming public as a direct attack on their rights, and would result in an enormous public uprising, even bigger than the one in the late '80s in which the FDA's Parklawn Building was surrounded by hundreds of thousands of angry demonstrators and police cars were overturned. Ours is allegedly a government of, by and for the people.
Lets hope so.
Through a lack of openness, the Commission certainly appears to be conducting a Codex harmonization effort. I have reported on the Codex International Threat to Health Freedom in the February, April, December, January, and February issues of Life Extension Magazine, as well as on the internet. What your Commission is trying to do is to engineer a takeover of the natural products industry. I don't agree with Cordaro. The study yielded favorable results, and formed the backbone for further experimentation that led to the creation of a whole new approach to treatment- one which benefitted me personally, but is still being suppressed because it threatens the business interests of the pharmaceutical industry.