History tends to show up inadequacies in social and political blueprints.
The context in which the Supreme Court has been forced to acknowledge this particular lacuna in the Constitution is education. The problem is very clearly defined by the two practices which urgently need modification in private minority professional educational institutions. The other is the demand for capitation fees for admission in these institutions. Both practices, legitimized by the specific aims and needs of minorities run institutions, are sources of abuse and corruption. It is of the utmost importance that the corrective measures the Supreme Court has suggested are not delayed or blunted because of uncertainty over the definition of minorities in Article 30.