Bill can now force the computing public into using 'his' browser and continue to make the computing world 'his' world. The hell with everyone else. I don't like manipulative manuvers that sell you one product, like '95, and then force it to later be packaged with an add on product that takes over your system as Internet Explore 4.0 does. It is a bait and switch ploy that ropes the computer world into Bill's designed computer world whether they want to be there or not.
Individual choice is removed from the end buy, the supplier, and the computing world as a whole.
The appeals court should not have ruled as such. It is a blow to the American 'free' enterprise system to so 'force' 'add-on' products down their throat whether they want them or even need them. Once Bill have total control, which is the direction being taken, then the quality of the products will really suffer as he will no longer have to compete.