As a scientists, I don't believe there is a general consensus among scientists that humanity is operating in an unsustainable way. I do agree that there are many things we could and should do less destructively. But I feel your tone overstates the magnitude of the problem.
Economic markets have their own intelligence.
Economics is not everything, but it does capture a lot of societal and psychological structure. It's grade school math here. The Net as a free information source does not depend on the economic viability of free information. The cost of posting websites is low, thus we have an essentially un-economic information distribution system, interacting with the increasingly complex international economic network. I don't think any drastic change in global socioeconomics is going to happen by legislation or international agreement.