I don't think it's at all likely. Judge Bork is now probably too old for consideration. Likewise, picking Bork or Starr would be seen as picking a fight with the Democrats. A President Bush would have to value such a fight much more than actual influence over the court to do such a thing. In fact, the biggest battles on the court these days involve the balance of power between the states and the federal government.
History is a useful guide here.
President Franklin Roosevelt selected justices based on the idea that they would uphold the New Deal. Those justices ended up addressing unforeseen questions of civil rights for over a generation. This doesn't mean that the Supreme Court is unimportant as an election issue. It does mean that one is at best playing the odds.