With all this controversy about the impact of the borderlands construction, it is necessary to question whether the project is necessary or even justified. The main argument for the construction of the fence and roads is prevention of drug traffic and illegal immigration. These are two issues that seem to justify the use of extreme measures. The drug trade presents a serious problem for the United States to contend with. According to a June 1992 Operation Alliance report, the drug smuggling is thriving due to the presence of vast open areas between ports of entry, and a very low law enforcement presence.
Illegal immigration is a threat of a different nature.
Illegal immigrants are considered to be a threat because they depress wages, and take jobs from U.S. citizens. Illegal immigration is thought to be at least partially responsible for the low-wage economies of border towns like El Paso. The presence of the illegals is believed to keep wages low, and prevent successful labor organizing. In light of this information, it would seem beneficial to increase the security of the border with improved roads and fences. The argument against increased security along the border is based on an idea that addresses both drug smuggling and illegal immigration.