E is present' is true in W n . E is present' is true when W n is actual. E is present' is true at m n . The rationale is that the moment m n extends through each of the worlds in Schlesinger's model. E is present' is true when W n is actual and W n is actual when m n is present.
E is past when m n is past and E is present when m n is present and E is future when m n is future.
Consequently, paradox can be avoided by indirectly relativizing statements about the present to the moments in the B-series at which they are true. Thus, Schlesinger's model doesn't actually succeed in providing a transientist solution to McTaggart's paradox. Consequently, if the actuality of W n is to be relativized to Schlesinger's A-series, the relativization must be relational . This would proceed as follows. Therefore, if Schlesinger relativizes the actuality of the worlds within his model to particular moments in the B-series, he hasn't succeeded in providing a transientist solution to McTaggart's paradox.