The dispute resolution system and the guide draw on the Institute's experience in dealing with harassment since 1973, when MIT's first policies and procedures on this matter were put in place. The current system is designed to provide individuals with a choice of options so that they may choose one that is most comfortable for them. Some of the options are more formal in nature, while others rely on less formal,problem-solving approaches. Possible constraints on freedom of expression is a frequent issue in discussions of harassment in a university. It is usually easier to deal with such questions if one thinks in terms of interests rather than rights.
Freedom of expression is essential in a university.
So is freedom from unreasonable and disruptive offense. We are well advised to avoid putting these essential elements of the university to a balancing test. In some ways, this guide is a work in progress. Its purpose is to improve the way we deal with harassment, and ultimately to reduce the incidence of harassment altogether. Comments and suggestions for improvement are welcome, and may be sent to the Office of the Provost.