We would also severely strain our relations with our many friends and allies in Asia and elsewhere, and could potentially destabilize the entire region. A fourth myth, suggested by some of those who advocate containment, is that the only alternative is appeasement. Consistent with the approach of five previous administrations of both political parties, this Administration's policy of pursuing U.S. interests through engagement with China in no way implies acquiescence in Chinese actions that clash with U.S. interests or international norms. As I explained earlier, engagement allows us to tailor our responses to the specific circumstances in each area where we have differences with China. It makes it possible for us to apply a wide range of inducements and pressures on issues where we wish to encourage China to adjust its course.
Engagement means being firm whenever necessary, and cooperative whenever possible.
Where China does not comply with its international commitments or with internationally-recognized standards of behavior, we are prepared to use all the instruments at our disposal, including those provided for in existing domestic legislation, that may be required to promote progress. Our willingness to take a firm stance when necessary is required to protect our interests, maintain domestic support for engagement, and engender respect in Beijing. At the same time, engagement allows us to continue to enjoy the substantial benefits of a constructive and cooperative bilateral relationship with China. In the midst of the inevitable frictions and media attention, let us not lose sight of these positive elements. The benefits of engagement with China are not limited, as is sometimes implied, to the economic and commercial sphere.