The industry must have a chance to give its view. As I said, the environment could be different then from now, so we must have the opportunity to question whether the proposals are technically competent. Otherwise, we could be implementing provisions that encourage everyone to flee mainstream providers and use fringe providers based outside the UK that can offer an anonymous service and work rounds. It is in everyone's interest to ensure the requisite technical competence, which can be achieved through targeted methods based on particular addresses rather than through general interceptions, which undermine confidence in the system. It is an important group of amendments and we are prepared to support any or all of the amendments that Conservative Members wish to take to their logical conclusion.
Every amendment offers something new in fleshing out the clause.
It is essential to flesh it out to avoid ending up either with technically incompetent solutions or solutions that consumers feel they have no voice in, and that undermine their reason for using the system. The Minister's duty is to try to reconcile the three different interest groups. One way in which he could do so is to generate a sense of confidence. That might best be done by affirmative resolution, as my hon. Friend the Member for North-East Hertfordshire has said, so that developments triggered by the clause could be debated in Parliament.