There the predictions become far less explicit, as if the genome were going to tell us everything about our bodies and nothing about our behavior. It's easy to refute the advocates of genetic determinism, if any non- straw ones exist, because it is obvious to scientists that human behavior is not completely specified by the genome. But the opposite position that evolution does not care about and has in no way shaped human behavior seems equally implausible.
Evolution is likely to have molded any and all behaviors that conferred survival value.
That may be easy to accept for behaviors like fighting and mating. Art might seem a pure expression of human volition. But listen to paleo anthropologists debating the first appearance of art in the archaeological record and it seems that art, or some aspect of mind closely related to it, played a critical role in human evolution. Most human societies have religious beliefs of one kind or another. Some may take that as proof of a universal creator.