Atlas asserts that the trial court failed to provide good cause for its decision to depart from the general rule that the successful party recover its costs. Both Atlas and the McKennas requested and benefited from the appointment of the auditor. This fact shown on the face of the trial court's record constitutes good cause for assessing a portion of the cost for the auditor against Atlas. See Overstreet v. Home Indem. Atlas's third cross point is overruled.
Judgment is affirmed.