If you know of a site which you feel deserves recognition, based upon these standards, please write to me . The final decision about who receives these awards and who is denied them is, at present, strictly my own. As with any awards presented by an individual, personal preference creeps in. For example, I don't have a lot of patience with superstition and muddled thinking. Exceptions in this category would only be sites where testable supporting evidence can be supplied and to which investigative efforts can be applied.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
Given the proof and a means of verification then, of course, no investigation is unworthy. There's one other qualifier I haven't mentioned, but it's perhaps the most important of all. If the answer is the latter, then the site gets high marks.