The growing crisis in Darwinian theory is becoming more apparent all the time. The work of creationists and other non-Darwinians is growing and finding a more receptive ear than ever before. In this discussion I want to elaborate on what I believe are the five critical areas where Darwinism and evolutionary theory in general are failing. The bankruptcy of the blind watchmaker hypothesis The biological evidence that the rule in nature is morphological stability over time and not constant change. Much of the reason for evolution's privileged status has been due to confusion over just what people mean when they use the word evolution.
Evolution is a slippery term.
Peppered moths, Hawaiian drosophila fruit flies, and even Galapagos finches are clear examples of change over time. If you say that this form of evolution is a fact, well, so be it. But many scientists extrapolate beyond this meaning. But this begs the question. Common examples of natural selection acting on present genetic variation do not tell us how we have come to have horses, wasps, and woodpeckers, and the enormous varieties of living animals.