Usually, up to five referees will judge the quality of a manuscript for the initial review. Rejection by three or more of the referees normally results in rejection of the manuscript for further consideration. The editor may, however, inform the author of referee recommendations for further revision. Manuscripts may be revised and reviewed until a majority of the referees involved and the editor approve the manuscript. Manuscripts are posted for full Board review and majority approval before they are placed online for general public access.
Manuscripts are subject to further critical review by any reader of the electronic journal.
Constructive comments submitted to the editor may be shared with the author and may be posted as part of the article. Concept A substantial, informed statement concerning issues which are of great importance to the field. Such statements will include extensive reference to the research literature where appropriate. Literature Review and Proposal A substantial, organized, logical and critical review of the key literature supporting a research proposal or summarizing key issues from the research may be acceptable for publication. Such manuscripts should include implications for further research and clearly establish implications for practice.