What is generally called revolution in politics is not revolution at all. It is in fact, a violent explosion resulting from lack of revolution. It is when a balanced exchange of respect and consideration between human beings, as a result of greed, which need not always be for material possessions but also for fame, earthly prominence and many other things is lacking, in any social order, there will be an explosion. Such undesirable outcome issue from unjust and unfair of giving and taking. This explosion is wrongly described as revolution instead of lack of revolution.
Lets take for instance, a water hose.
If we drive water through it the water will come out at the other end. There will be an input and out put. If we block the end which allows the water out, a pressure will be built up and sooner or latter cause a burst. In the same way, when respect and consideration, are not reciprocated, between people and government, there will be a lack of revolution, which means there is a lack of natural circulation, resulting in disharmony and probably blood shed. However, since it is the society that produces the government and not the other way round, the blame must fall on the society for cultivating an unjust and unfair culture, that served as a soil for the government to germinate, sprout, grow and fruit into an unjust governance.