Of course I saved the best for last. I'd say they're wrong, but I'm too modest and subtle for such an absolute statement. There are many forms of eclecticism, but for you, the gentle reader, it is not really important to know or understand the differences between them all. It's a pragmatic approach to therapy, meshing all of the above approaches together to fit the individualistic human being that sits before them for the first time with their particular problem. Unfortunately, since it is based upon individualism and pragmatism, many people confuse it with confusion itself.
Good eclecticism is neither messy nor confused.
For example, a typical eclectic approach in therapy is to view an individual from a psychodynamic perspective, but to use more active interventions, such as you might find in a cognitive-behavioral approach. That is, believe it or not, eclecticism. Most forms of this therapy are much more subtle and less distinct than that. For instance, I tend to view individuals who come into my office as much as through the patient's own eyes as possible, imagining their worldview and the system that goes to make up their problems. In eclecticism, there is no one right or guaranteed way of approaching any given problem.