Presuppositional apologists do not, for example, argue that the accounts of witnesses to Jesus resurrection are unimportant, or that attestation for Christianity s having changed individual lives is wanting, or that empirical data supporting the truth of the Bible and of Christianity is unimportant. Presuppositionalists simply argue that all of these much be understood within a Christian context. This is really just another way of saying that presuppositionalists believe that apologetics is fundamentally an ethical issue. Those who do not accept Christianity, unbelievers, in other words, are not dissuaded from their unbelief by historical, experiential, or empirical evidence. They have their own context, an unbelieving context, within which to interpret this evidence.
Facts speak within a particular context.
Within a skeptical, unbelieving context, for example, wide historical attestation of Christ s bodily resurrection can be easily explained without recourse to the infallibility of the Bible or the truth of Christianity. This is simply a new religious self-awareness. The same thing is true of many Buddhists, Muslims, and New Age practitioners. But this doesn t mean that the Bible is the inspired Word of God or that Christianity is true. It only proves that Genesis gives a reasonably accurate account of a large boat that finally came to rest in what is today Turkey.