The National Interpretation Project was conceived in November 1998 in response to the 1998-2000 Strategic Agenda outlined by AAM's Board of Directors. Emphasizing public accountability, they further identified interpretation as the place to start. AAM peer reviewers' findings, as well as National Inquiry Database reports produced by AAM's Technical Information Service , reinforced the need. Six regional study groups , composed of representatives from six different museums each, met in September and October to develop consensus on best practices for interpretation. Conducted at the regional association meetings, with the help of an Advisory Committee member , the study groups investigated a preliminary working list of characteristics, elements , and outcomes of exemplary interpretation.
Interpretation is a dynamic process of communication between the museum and the audience.
Interpretation is the means by which the museum delivers its content. Information generated from the project will be evaluated, clarified, and published by AAM to help museums benchmark their performances and increase their accountability. As museums improve their interpretation, their ability to serve the public will increase, which in turn can garner increased support for museums. For any problems or questions concerning this site, please contact the webmaster .