The trial court erred in vacating the expungement order. Because the trial court improperly applied the expungement statute, its order was voidable, not void. The state does not challenge the subject matter jurisdiction of the trial court, but instead, its exercise of this jurisdiction in interpreting and applying the statute. The state failed to properly attack the expungement order through direct appeal. Therefore, the original expungement order is reinstated.
Judgment vacating the order is reversed.
Trial court properly overrules second super shock probation motion filed pursuant to R.C. 2947.061 when first motion was effectively denied by the inaction of the trial court. Decision to deny shock probation is not a final appealable order. Summary judgment affirmed. Trial court did not err when it denied Crim. Trial court did not abuse its discretion when it struck Defendant's objections to a magistrate's decision that was filed 108 days after a transcript requested by the Defendant had been filed.