Sometimes I don't even mind wrong science. Star Trek is built on wrong science. Despite all those time-travelling stories, the Star Trek universe is, at its core, one that obeys the laws of Newton, not his successors. Stardates flow at a steady rate, ignoring special relativity's expanding and shrinking time conundrums. The Enterprise crew, zipping about the galaxy at really, really fast speeds doesn't age any more slowly than the folks back on Earth.
Light travels at infinite speed.
It doesn't bother me that when Gene Roddenbery devised the Star Trek universe he threw out Einstein's relativity. I don't expect television writers to work through complex equations in order to write scripts. Scientific preciseness would merely befuddle. When starships fall out of the sky because their engines sputter and die, however, that bothers me. Wrong science is no longer a storytelling convenience designed to avoid obtuse technical jargon, but a cornerstone of the plot.