Nat'l Union Fire v. Pled guilty to nine counts of robbery, one count of criminal conspiracy and three counts of aggravated assault. Our interpretation of the arbitration provision as a whole and, in particular, the highlighted portions above, convinces us that the parties intended to submit all of their grievances to arbitration, regardless of whether the claims sounded in tort or contract. This is an appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County denying Appellant's motion to bar retrial on double jeopardy grounds. We conclude that the dual characterization in appellant's complaint and claim does not defeat the claim nor warrant dismissal of the action.
Husband seeks to quash the appeal as interlocutory.
For the reasons set forth we agree, and quash the instant appeal. After a careful review of the record and relevant case law, we find that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear Bride's claims.