Unlike Cordova, neither of the successful candidates had worked for State Farm or had any specific experience in insurance. There were no written criteria for choosing candidates, and the manager admitted he used different criteria for picking the successful applicants. Raker also admitted telling Cordova that she was the number two candidate in the selection pool, but claims he only said it to make her feel better, having previously decided that she was the third most qualified candidate. Based on these facts, the Court allowed Cordova to go ahead with her trial. For the court's rejection of that argument, go here .
Information here is correct at the time it is posted.
Case decisions cited here may be reversed. Please do not rely on this information without consulting an attorney first. All rights reserved. Read our Privacy Policy.