That limit can be adjusted in various ways by augmenting the mind with computer-user interfaces in the future, but that limit is going to be what sets the limit to our relationship to technology. I don't believe we can say that no one will ever run faster than people have run in the past. And yet, I think its safe to say that, in a fair race, somebody won't run twice as fast. So, there's some kind of approximate limit. I believe that when we have to deal with a greater amount of complexity than we do now, we will be using VR to do that, because it's the best way of seeing things.
History is interesting.
I'm part of a group that's researching digital persistence. If you go back to the dawn of the digital era, one of the things that was supposed to be good about digital technology was that you could clone information, and therefore information would become eternal. That's to be contrasted with analog information, such as LPs and movies and videos, which are all gradually fading away. We just had a meeting about a couple of weeks ago that included some interesting people such as Brian Eno. There's an irony here, which is that even as specific data can become lost, due to digital standards creep, we actually don't have an archival digital medium, sort of a shocking thing to realize.