There were also 23 responses undecided. Some were concerned about visitors ability to pay fees. Some believed that Idaho residents should have preference over visitors from other states or that no site or resource improvements were warranted. At the other end of the spectrum, the majority of respondents felt that users paying to directly support the area where they recreate was fair. That tax based funding was neither likely to keep pace with the growing demand nor appropriate for citizens who don't use the opportunities.
Fees are a little low.
It is no different than a hunting and fishing license. Many offered suggestions how the fee demo program could be simplified or could be made more equitable. Some suggested that voluntary payments as donations or volunteer labor would be more acceptable to them. Others suggested that fees for certain developed sites was the limit of their acceptance. USDA is an equal employment opportunity employer.