In the final analysis, he says, a person whose ethics is derived from religion is more morally reliable than one who always does what he feels is right, or the one who acts in accordance to a moral code to which he feels obligated. With credit and gratitude to anyone who does good in this world, if our greatest concern is that goodness increase and prevail, we cannot rely on those who only answer to their own consciences. When you have to answer only to yourself, it is all too easy to err and it is all too easy to rationalize away anything. Well, in the end I think both Mr. Prager and I agree that what is crucial is the quality of one s conscience and the moral strength to do what's right. For KNX 1070, this is Michael Josephson reminding you that character counts 4.
Lets face it, honest citizens pay more taxes than dishonest ones.
Business people who keep their word even when it's disadvantageous sometimes pay a heavy price for their integrity. And, coaches who refuse to violate recruiting rules or play ineligible athletes may lose more games than their less scrupulous opponents. These costs are just the dues we pay to maintain integrity and build a reputation. Unfortunately, many people are unwilling to pay the price. The ease and frequency with which so many people lie, cheat and break promises suggests the benefits of high ethical standards are neither certain enough nor substantial enough to deter misconduct.