According to this view Laestadianism contains a contrasting symbolic system to Norwegian symbols. Laestadian symbols and values rivals the symbolic system that defines Norwegian symbols. Laestadian symbols and values rivals the symbolic system to Norwegian values and interests, in one way one could say that we are dealing with complementary value systems. The competing values represent different religious worldviews. Laestadianism also contains prescriptions on how to behave in both the religious and mundane sphere.
Laestadian values signify a total dichotomization.
The Laestadian worldview gives room for establishing alternatives to profane values. In this community this represents the division between Sami and Norwegian. In emic categories however, the conflict represents the division between Laestadian and non-Laestadian values are not recognized as an ethnic conflict but as a religious conflict. Accordingly, Laestadianism can be understood as a way of expressing opposition to various value systems, but as a implicit ethnic boundary that is not expressed as such in daily life. A Laestadian does not inevitably risk ascription of a Sami identity, though it gives room for Sami identity intra-ethnic.