The form the regulation should take and its scope are surely matters of policy and, as such, within a State's choice. A State is not required to exercise its intervention on the basis of abstract reasoning. The Constitution commands neither logical symmetry nor exhaustion of a principle. The injunction here was drawn to meet what California deemed the evil of picketing to bring about proportional hiring. We do not go beyond the circumstances of the case.
Generalizations are treacherous in the application of large constitutional concepts.
Mr. Justice Reed , concurring. I read the opinion of the Supreme Court of California to hold that the pickets sought from Lucky Stores, Inc., discrimination in favor of persons of the Negro race, a discrimination unlawful under California law. Such picketing may be barred by a State. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. RACE Barrows v.