Since he could be fired, he could also be denied reinstatement. Moreover, since his employment was at-will, the employer could modify the terms and conditions of his employment at any time. Therefore, even if plaintiff's characterization of his rights as an employee were correct, the defendant would not be liable for having changed those arrangements unilaterally. For all of the foregoing reasons, this action will be dismissed with prejudice. An Order follows.
Judgment is entered in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff.