There is little doubt in the minds of the plaintiffs that the court will dismiss this case if plaintiffs fail to comply with any court rule. Injunctive relief is to be placed on a fast track basis. The Court's actions today allow the defendants an unbridled will and means to cause the plaintiffs severe and unrecoverable harm. The present case involves alleged misconduct on the part of state officials that bars the public from essential information necessary to vote and make informed decisions and otherwise defend against tyranny. As previously seem by the defendant's conduct, the state desires to keep the public ignorant through its covert and secret operations.
Injunctions are dispositive matters.
At the outset, although none of the parties has raised the question, we are bound to note that a magistrate lacks power to enter an injunction even in a case where the district court has jurisdiction. It is obvious that the district court cannot by rule confer on a magistrate jurisdiction not permitted by statute. Neither can consent of the parties authorize a magistrate to enter final judgments where power to act in such area is restricted by statute. Snook , Supra demands that this case proceed immediately to the next phase without further delay to insure due process and equal protection for the plaintiffs. Dispositive facts or matters are jural facts, or those acts or events that create, modify or extinguish jural relations.