The proposed policy was created in the open. Users and other have been able to look at drafts of the policy and make comment. Drafts have also been presented at conferences and via electronic mailing lists. Before being finalized, the proposal will be presented to the faculty senate. The result is all this openness and participation is the most refined and detailed policy I have seen.
Due process is provided by processing alleged rule violations via regular university channels.
The system administrator should confer with his or her administrative officer or other person designated by that administrative officer before taking this step. A user may appeal such a suspension or restriction and petition for reinstatement of computing privileges through the University's judicial system, through the grievance procedures outlined in University collective bargaining agreements, or by petition to the Dean of Students. Suspend or restrict the alleged abuser's computing privileges during the investigation and judicial processing. A user may appeal such a suspension or restriction and petition for reinstatement of computing privileges through the University's judicial system, through the grievance procedures outlined in University collective bargaining agreements, or by petition to the Dean of Students. The two quotes from the proposed policy don't seem to agree on when a user should be suspended from the computer.