As we consider these needs, we will certainly take into account the security situation in the Strait, including P.R.C. deployments, the pace and scope of dialogue between the P.R.C. and Taiwan, and the overall regional security picture. In this age of highly sophisticated weaponry, I think we are all sometimes prone to equating security with military capability. But a durable peace will rest less on arms than success in addressing differences through dialogue on a mutually acceptable basis. Thus, whereas missiles and missile defense systems ultimately cannot in themselves secure peace and prosperity, dialogue and creative compromise can do so. Dialogue and compromise cannot be wedded to an imposed timetable.
Good faith is required of, and in the interest of, both sides.
The provisions of the TRA and general U.S. policy in the region will continue to contribute to an environment conducive to dialogue and therefore to finding a lasting resolution to differences across the Taiwan strait. Conclusion U.S. relations with the P.R.C. and the people on Taiwan are likely to be one of our most complex and important foreign policy challenges for many years to come. This Administration, like the five Republican and Democratic Administrations before it, firmly believes that the future of cross-Strait relations is a matter for Beijing and Taipei to resolve peacefully. There is no shortage of good ideas to resolve differences, and there is no unique solution. There are many ways that the two sides can enhance trust and reduce tension.