I'd like to thank our readers for their comments and suggestions, and DEP for giving us plenty to write about. The report examines alternatives to lower flood damage in the lower Neshaminy, and speaks to the cost and effectiveness of the alternatives. And not only is the dam cheaper, they say, the dam is better. That's certainly a claim worth examining. To us, that would mean that the dam would have to be the size of Hoover Dam, or have supernatural properties.
Lets see how well the dam does in protecting homes from floods, which is what it is supposed to do.
It's clear that the non-structural alternative provides more widespread protection. Lets look at the numbers with that in mind. Lets see how many homes are actually protected by each alternative. This is the flood that each alternative provide protection. That translates to 143 more homes damaged if the dam is built rather than the non-structural alternative.