Gutmann shows what a powerful tool that expanded definition was in the military culture war, and the damage it has done. It is not surprising then, that reports tend to claim a terrible situation that has not improved and which requires more regulation and punishment, fewer niceties of legal rights, more structuring of women as weak victims rather than strong persons. I would think public safety was being maintained. But the chairman is not so happy because the objective of the Regulated Health Professions Act was to stamp out sexual abuse by health professionals. How any rational person could conceivably believe that an Act would totally stamp out sexual behaviour in human beings is beyond me.
Human beings are sexual, yes they are.
There is nothing innately unethical about sex. Sex is also a complicated human behaviour, highly nuanced. Not even St. Augustine would have created such an unrealistic, inhuman objective. To achieve such zero risk, and to use zero tolerance for a questionable definition such as sexual touching or contact or inappropriate remarks and behaviours, would require such unethical tactics that an ordinary person would and should be repulsed. Well, of course not.