Little doubt remains that the court's actions today will produce injustice in other cases and more particular the present case. The defendants and their attorneys are taught to have an unbridled excuse to commit murder, with the court's blessing. The public's confidence in the judicial process is dying an untimely death. The court places the plaintiffs at an extreme disadvantage by applying unwritten rules of court that are indiscriminately authored and applied to pro se parties. There is little doubt in the minds of the plaintiffs that the court will dismiss this case if plaintiffs fail to comply with any court rule.
Injunctive relief is to be placed on a fast track basis.
The Court's actions today allow the defendants an unbridled will and means to cause the plaintiffs severe and unrecoverable harm. The present case involves alleged misconduct on the part of state officials that bars the public from essential information necessary to vote and make informed decisions and otherwise defend against tyranny. As previously seem by the defendant's conduct, the state desires to keep the public ignorant through its covert and secret operations. Injunctions are dispositive matters. At the outset, although none of the parties has raised the question, we are bound to note that a magistrate lacks power to enter an injunction even in a case where the district court has jurisdiction.