In the following analysis, the squeegee bias is used, however this may not be the best representation of the true performance of the squeegee mode. CTI is calculated from the center pixels values alone, while FWHM is calculated using the summed pulseheight from G02346 events and a locally derived gain so the FWHM is an overestimate. Al-K results are not as good, perhaps because of the changing bias level discussed in the previous section. These results can also be seen in the following plots. CCD performance changes during squeegee test.
Listed values are for the entire dataset.