Electronic objects, whether verbal or visual are still objects, and Kant applies.
Events are another category.
The macaw has video cameras for eyes. People could walk up to the installation and see inside, and also see themselves on monitors either side of the cage. Video projected on the world wide web with some interactivity going on from those logging on. Here we have a completely distributed aesthetic cogntive event where the boundary between subject gazing and object being gazed have completely dissolved, and therefore categories of unidrectional cognitive aesthetic apprehension cannot be applied to these telepresence events. A new aesthetic theory based on distributed and emergent properties paradigms of cognitive science with reference to Kac's art is in the works, and concludes my current book project.