You're going to have to go into some more detail here. I'm glad you asked that question. Deductions based on general observation on Laws such as the Law of Biogenesis are absolute and falsifiable in a laboratory. Intelligent design is also based on such deduction NOT on induction which applies specifics of a system to another system. Actually, you've got that backwords.
Induction is the process of arriving at a general conclusion from the observation of specific facts.
Without facts, there can be no inductive reasoning. You can only draw poor conclusions from them. You can, however, make weak appeals to shaky premises. The idea of special creation is based scientific observation that is falsifiable. One to start with would be the Law of Biogenesis.