In the following list, I have checked off those that may apply to your paper, either wholly or, more usually, just in part. It suffers from too many logical lapses, too many non sequiturs . It contains serious errors in historical analysis, confusing cause and effect relationships. It is, on balance, more narrative or descriptive than truly analytical, as explained above. It lacks precision, clarity, and rigour in economic analysis.
Economic analysis is fundamentally mathematical in nature.
If you are an Economics student, try supporting your analysis with graphs, algebraic equations, or other forms of mathematical analysis. Your answer is based upon an uncritical acceptance of the views of one author, or just a few sources, without considering the opposing views . Although you are not required to agree with views set forth in the lectures or readings, you must acknowledge opposing views when they have been pointed out to you, and when the question requires you to analyse opposing views and render your own verdict. Many of these exam questions require you to set forth and discuss opposing arguments. If you fail to do so, I must assume that you did not attend classes or do the required readings.