Members might suspect given the amount of attention that such a report attracts. I do not want a high or low number of complaints. I want people, including the chairmen of appeal tribunals, to have somewhere to go if they believe that a poor medical report has been written, in the knowledge that their appeal will be thoroughly investigated. If that means that remedial action has to be taken with the doctor, such as retraining or tighter management, or, in the most extreme cases, if we have to stop using that doctor's services, then that is what will happen. If he will make a statement on the cost to business of the measures arising from the Social Security Fraud Bill.
Gentleman asks about costs.
For one large bank, the annual cost of providing the information under the Bill is estimated to be equal to just over one hour's profit. The Bill provides that if someone is convicted of benefit fraud twice, their benefit is stopped, which did not use to happen. Gentleman also asked about the cost to banks. I repeat that the cost to a bank or other large financial institution in an entire year is estimated to be equal to just one hour's profit, so he will realise that what we are asking is not unreasonable. It is in the interests of banks and insurance companies that we stop fraud because people who defraud the DSScould also be interested in defrauding those financial institutions.