Whatever one thinks of his decision in this particular case, Dr. Lundberg should have had the editorial freedom to make his considered decisions, good or bad. Medical science, particularly around issues related to public health, will not flourish if organized medicine interferes, in such destructive ways, with the process. Most senior academic physicians involved with scientific publications in medical journals are outraged at the AMA s behavior. For example, the editors of the two top British medical journals, the Lancet and the British Medical Journal, have written scathing editorials that they have posted on the world wide web and will publish in their journals this week. There are reasons for the public to be concerned about these events.
Health is about broader issues than health care.
Political decisions related to pollution, education, social services, and public housing have a profound effect on the health of public. Doctors and other health workers need to be educated about these issues, and an independent environment of open inquiry is required for that education. If medical associations hinder the efforts of scientists and educators, and impose their own agenda, the public will ultimately suffer. The Medical Reform Group therefore adds its voice to those condemning the AMA s actions and calling for the AMA to dismiss its executive Vice-President, Dr. Anderson. Academic freedom is the life blood of scientific inquiry.