The deciding official sustained all nine of the separate incidents of misconduct, but mitigated the penalty to demotion and reassignment. On appeal to the MSPB, the administrative judge affirmed the agency's action. The Board agreed, finding that the agency committed procedural error by considering reasons for its action that were not recorded in the proposal notice. In addition, the deciding official had admitted that he considered incidents not mentioned in the proposal letter in making his decision to sustain the charge and impose the penalty of demotion and reassignment. The Board vacated the entire penalty.
Harmful error is a case-killer.
I think you should profit from the mistakes of others. You don't live long enough to make them all yourself.