Six months after judgment for R in her suit against S, S moves for an order vacating the judgment and for a new trial. He bases the motion on some newly discovered evidence. He accompanies the Motion with papers demonstrating that he could not have found the evidence earlier, and that the presentation of the evidence would probably have changed the outcome of the trial. L desires to sue M for damages arising out of an auto accident that occurred in Nebraska. L is a resident of Kansas, M is a resident of Illinois.
L commences the suit in state district court in Kansas.
L causes M to be personally served with the summons and complaint at M's home in Illinois. M moves to dismiss on the grounds that the Kansas court lacks personal jurisdiction. The court denies the motion on the ground that M was personally served in her home state. J and L sue M and N in federal court in Minnesota. The suit is for breach of contract.