This appeal follows the entry of the amended judgment. The findings of a district court sitting without a jury will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous. Minn. R. Civ. A finding is clearly erroneous if it is either without substantial evidentiary support or induced by an erroneous view of the law. On appeal, evidence must be viewed ina light most favorable to the district court's findings.
Due regard is given to the district court's opportunity to judge witness credibility.
Minn. R. Civ. The daughters contend that their arguments involve not just fact issues but also legal issues subject to de novo review. The arguments articulated, however, are questions of fact and credibility. Applying de novo review to questions of fact is neither this court's function nor within its capability. Accordingly, the clearly erroneous standard of Rule 52.01 applies to the issues raised by the daughters.