To preclude an improper interpretation in local contracting offices, the statement that the procedures in Parts 14 and 15 are not mandatory should be emphasized. We also appreciate that examples of the flexibilities have been left out of this coverage. This helps to emphasize that the intent is to have lean coverage in the FAR in these areas, with guidelines and examples left to other areas. In general, we favor the procedures to be used for this test, since it will definitely streamline the acquisition process. However, we feel that these three sections are too wordy.
Limitations are . . .
We recommend a more powerful statement to illustrate the intent of the sentence. This is needed to prevent local activities from doing anything to hinder this streamlined practice. We feel that there is no reason to have two different rules to follow. We wholeheartedly endorse these sections. However, while the general language in these sections captured the intent, there can be misconceptions.