Indeed, Taylor finds the declining WASP society to have been an insufferably narrow one in need of enrichment. He does not discern these failings in the alien groups whom traditional WASPs are supposed to move over and make way for. There may be other excited advocates of Third World immigration, like grasping corporate executives, social workers, respectable conservative careerists. But multiculturalists support it for transparent political reasons. And as other groups overtake and surpass the number of Euro-Americans, the multiculturalists will be on the scene to celebrate the vanishing of a despised race and its once hegemonic culture.
Immigration is an article of faith for neoconservatives - a subject that deserves a separate essay.
So the belief that multiculturalism can be avoided without reforming immigration is fundamental, represented by, among many others, Irwin Stelzer, Norman Podhoretz, and John J. Miller, now significantly at National Review . The trick for these democratic globalists is to gain control over American education and to use it to promote their Cold War liberal ideology as a universally digestible American creed. After all, what makes multiculturalists bad for them is not the current war against the patrimony of Southern whites or the multicultural investment in changing the Western world s demographic base, but the challenge to a neocon conception of human rights and our contamination by Teutonic murkiness. The sad, almost unspeakable truth is that the Left is running both sides of the immigration debate. This is certainly evident in the current visible discussion about multiculturalism and in the studied avoidance of unpleasant points by those engaging the immigration question.