I have a copy of Judge Overton's decision right here. Unlike you, I rely on primary sources for information instead of dredging up sludge from creationist screeds. His view that the universe is infused with a creator makes him a cosmic pantheist evolutionist. More like you've repeated the same ignorant nonsense ad infinitum. Darwin's views on the ultimate origin of life are irrelevant here.
Journals typically get much more material submitted than they have space to publish.
They choose the most relevant and best documented. In science unorthodox ideas are readilly accepted once sufficient convincing evidence is offered in their support. If sufficient evidence arises to support their viruses from space theory it will be accepted. Otherwise it won't. Einstein's relativity theories weren't immediately accepted either.