2d 277, Syl. However, in determining whether the trial court erred in its application of the statute to the facts of this case, appellate review is restricted to determining whether the trial court abused its discretion. With that, the motion is denied. However, we do not accept Roxane's contention that the trial court dismissed her motion for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. It is sufficient if it demonstrates a right to relief under one or more grounds so long as it is timely filed.
Hunt is distinguishable.
In addition, her motion did not demonstrate a right to relief. We believe the trial court gave Roxane's attorney fair opportunity to present argument and proffer evidence in support of her motion for relief from judgment, but the attorney did not show a sufficient basis upon which relief could be granted. We conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Roxane's motion. Roxane contends the trial court erred in granting Michael attorney fees. Her argument is that Michael did not comply with the procedures required in the separation agreement before making a claim for attorney fees.