I think that the fourth point, which our friend from Yemen also raised, is that the IMF and the World Bank talk about safety nets but a serious program for poverty alleviation is yet to come out from either of these institutions. A poverty elevation program is either you create assets for the poor or you create employment for the poor. Those are the two things that you have to do. Those specific objectives have really not come out in either the World Bank and certainly not the IMS programs. I think what we need to look at is the way we tended to look at enterprise as the monopoly of major businessmen.
Enterprise exists even in the small farmer that turns from a traditional crop into a cash crop.
So it is how you mobilize the enterprise of thousands and thousands of small entrepreneurs that is going to create success in our countries. It is this kind of problem that should be addressed much more than the traditional ones that we have been dealing with in safety nets. I have listened to the interventions very carefully and in particular the facts on the adjustment policy that has to take place in a very slow manner otherwise it will disturb political stability. This idea of ownership, partnership and comprehensive approach to the issue of economic development has been what we have been trying to promote in the UN under the new development strategy. I think that the recent trend has been toward posteric policy leading to the political changes.