When NASA first sent men to the moon they dealt with a problem which never existed. They thought they had to make provision to land in a thick layer of it because they knew how much dust falls from space every year. When the first craft landed and only a couple inches of dust was found a lot of those NASA eggheads were seen running around in a state of shock. Radiometric dating is based on uniformitarianism and is therefore not accurate if conditions have not always been the same as they are now. That is the subject of an entire article all by itself sometime.
Facts are rocks and fossils.
Evolution and creation are both theories which attempt to explain how those rocks and fossils came to be as they are. Neither are provable, but to say that evolution is based on fact and creation isn't, just isn't so. Both theories are scientifically unproveable and therefore solely based on faith. The more I have studied the issue the more strongly I have come to believe that creation is more consistent with science than evolution is. Think about it.