While these are important and sensitive questions, with rare exceptions they are readily resolved. The cited opinion is the last word upon the subject and must be referred to henceforth as the source of the applicable principles. Rather, we must confront the vexatious problem of the appearance of such impropriety and determine whether such appearance is sufficiently compelling to necessitate disqualification of counsel from representing certain clients in certain situations. See DR 9-101. The vantage from which such 'appearance' must be evaluated is not that of the attorney involved, but rather is that of the public.
Integrity is the very breath of justice.
Confidence in our law, our courts and in the administration of justice is our supreme interest. See ABA Code of Professional Responsibility, Canon 9. The necessity to dispel all appearances of any impropriety becomes even more compelling when the attorney is a government attorney, i.e. , an attorney invested with the public trust.