It was specifically in trying to distinguish his treatment of General Ralston from the treatment that was rendered to Army General Longhouser just two days before. And I think that prompted more criticism than anything else. And these were two general officers, and one then had to look at why did one receive preferential treatment and the other with applause being allowed to retire in the best interest of the army. I do think that the commissions that are being appointed by Sec. Cohen are extremely important, and one area that needs to be looked at specifically, and so often associated with adultery, is this question of fraternization.
Fraternization varies to some degree as far as the policies of each of the services.
And there needs to be an overall Department of Defense view on fraternization. And, further, there needs to be some consistency between the service s treatment of fraternization and their treatment of allowing officer and enlisted marriages and then welcoming that couple back into the service and treating them as best they can to assign them to joint duty positions. And that happens at the stroke of midnight on the wedding night. And that seems to create some inconsistency in personnel policies. Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Jim, fraternization is an inappropriate relationship where an officer has that relationship with an enlisted member.