Green Tree raised several defenses that will be discussed in turn below. The first issue is whether the manufactured home became a fixture when it was placed on Debtors' real property. The Court concludes that the home did become a fixture. The intention of the party with regard to making the article a permanent accession to the realty is the controlling criterion. . . . The other tests derive their chief value as evidence of such intention. . . .
Intention is deduced from the relation of the parties and the circumstances of a particular case.
Here, it is clear that Debtors intended to affix the manufactured home to the realty. The permanent nature of the affixation, the construction of a basement foundation, and their request that the home manufacturer include an inside opening for a stairwell all manifest that intention. Once in place, it could not be readily moved like a mobile home. While Debtors may have signed boilerplate language to the contrary in their agreement with Green Tree, their actions and the result of their actions speak louder and result in the manufactured home becoming a fixture. Under S.D.C.L. ch.