This conversation on morality has turned into the classic 'how do you make money on open source' theme. While that's interesting, and completely appropriate, I believe that it sidesteps the question of intellectual property exists. Software was the first industry to get hit by IP issues, for obvious reasons, and because Stallman picked up on the broad issues right away we got the concept of free software. But free software and open source are not the same thing.
Free software is a moral stance, as opposed to open source, which is a practical stance.
That's an interesting direction. I re-read a bunch of RMS rants to see what he really meant, and generally found that his supporting arguments were more about practicality, i.e. the open source concept. I do believe that he saw the big picture, and had a real vision related to the nature of information, but I don't believe he ever successfully articulated it. Until that happens, all of the dialog related to morality will keep getting sucked back to 'how do you make money on open source', which is not the same issue. So I'd ask a different question.