However, where we have our differences is in the way of achieving the goals that our two groups share. As I'm sure you've guessed, judging by our name, the Social Pacifists are strongly opposed to the use of force to solve the social problems facing our world today. While using force may provide a quick and immediately effective solution to many social problems, the SP's realize that it is in no way a sustainable solution, nor, in our minds, is it a moral solution. Force oppresses everyone when force is used to suppress anyone. There are more effective, more sustainable, and more just solutions to any problem.
Love is the only force capable of transforming an enemy into a friend.
This is a common question. Even though we've been making the same accusation of Gore and Bush, and just as loudly, the Greens are generally the ones who speak up. I think what brings so many Greens here is the fact that, overall, Nader supporters are thinking people who are open minded to new and better ideas, while the Republicrats and Democins are set in their old partisan ways. The following link will lead you to answers to this and many other questions commonly asked of the Social Pacifists. Again thank you for your interest in the Social Pacifists.