SOM 'truth' is unworthy of that honor. That statement cannot be an absolute truth, because one absolute context was not presumed by the writer. The statement was made anthropocentrically, assuming finite human intellect in the context of finite knowledge. Our definition of absolute truth is a truth which is both complete and consistent in an unlimited context. By that definition of absolute, humans are incapable of knowing absolute truth.
Humans are capable of knowing local truths with a modicum of absoluteness based on presumed context.
If you disagree, please share your opinion with us. Our recent review of Henri Louis Bergson's Creative Evolution provided us more philosophical evidence to use on this issue of whether or not there either is or is not a classical concept of absolute truth which is valid in any context. Classicists almost always use one of their favorite themas to 'prove' absolute truth. This is not easy to grasp for uninitiated, but Bergson makes it somewhat easier for us. See his Topic 39 ' The Idea of Nothing ,' starting at page 291.