My main interest in this firm was the opportunity to leverage my computing and analysis background which I have developed in the course of receiving a Phd in experimental particle physics so as to apply it in a more lucrative fashion. The principle concerns which I ran into through the interview process involved the issue of whether I could adapt from the slower, more laborious pace of academic research to the fast paced, results oriented world of consulting. I now feel that this was a mistake. I've been involved with a few hi-tech head hunters since this offer was made and have turned my head around somewhat. My impression now is that one cant count on the advanced degree to effect one's starting level with a new firm.
Industry treats recent graduates the same independent of their academic experience.
The science advisor has several duties that vary throughout the life of the case. The best way to summarize it is that the job of the science advisor is to help the lawyers understand the invention in question enough to successfully try the case. The science advisor is another member of the team of lawyers, paralegals, secretaries, etc., working to get the best outcome for the client. The position does not require any formal law school education, although some knowledge of patents would be helpful. I was also asked to bring a writing sample along to demonstrate my ability to communicate about science to a non-science audience.