Science bases its quest for the truth primarily on fact. The discipline of science is only interested in evidence that can be proven or backed with significant amount of experiment. There is little emphasis on faith in the evidence provided in the scientific discipline. Quite the opposite is true with religion. There is minimal emphasis on the production of fact to support the religious discipline.
Faith is required and is nearly opposite of fact.
It takes little faith to accept fact. To have true faith it seems that there is frequently a lack of evidence in support of each particular thought. This is how I have come to understand the relationship between science and religion. Neither of these approaches is better than the other but utilizes each discipline's strengths. I agree with the thought of process theology.