The only difference is the degree of bluster by the adherants. The formation of life from nonlife. The Cambrian explosion and 3. The existence of irreducible complexity in certain biological structures. The frequent reference back to Miller-Urey in 1953 is indicative of the lack of progress in the field of life's origins for the past half century.
Life is fantastically more complex than anyone ever realized.
It certainly did not form randomly. Proposed self organization principles for it's beginning all currently are left wanting for any supporting evidence whatsoever. The latter two points go into biology, which I want go get into. Some evolutionists now are trying to ignore unsettling issues with life's origins by stating that they are all out of bounds regarding the subject of evolution. This is a specious argument.