The evolutionists can't stand someone who keeps referring back to the empirical, fundamental principles of science. They have to defend spontaneous generation on a large and cellular scale, and both can be shown to be foolhardy. I try to keep the conversation so anybody can understand it, and they don't like that. They'll try to impress somebody with million-dollar words about Miller's failed attempts to produce a viable protein. We need to be able to answer then technically, as to the chirality problem, the problem of dissolving in water, the reverse chirality of the aminos, his trapping of the amino acids to prevent them from being destroyed by the other chemicals the experiment created, and so on.
Evolution says that all happened by random chance.