TASP scores are included. A concern is that there is no central site for capturing alternative scores from other schools. That data should be saved in the SWT database. Steve Bazan will send a sample transcript to Dr. Ratliff. No method for reviewing the status of each request.
Issues surface after a project is ranked.
Perhaps we should follow FSS in ranking each request when new requests are presented. However, once programming begins on a project, that work will continue until completed even though the request is downgraded. ISS manages workload by matching resources to projects and occasionally shifts resources for large projects. The AA priority process doesn't have a process for allowing the originating office to rank its own projects. Dependencies between projects aren't recognized.