In other words, this is a case of an overall reform. The reform will look to reinforce linguistic equality and to create the proper conditions for the rectification of the practical shortcomings mentioned above. Linguistic legislation that is easy to read and to interpret will be conducive to making it clear to the authorities that the treatment of people as linguistic equals is important also in practice. Nevertheless, the objectives of the reform are not restricted to the practical improvement of the activities of the authorities, but it is promoted also as an enactment with symbolic value to the citizens. Indeed, language is the main factor in the maintenance of ethnic identity and characteristics.
Language is crucial for the individuals who are active in the society.
Consequently, it is vital that every citizen has an equal opportunity to use his or her native language also in the public context, and to receive various services in that language. Linguistic equality strengthens identity and adds to transparency in the society, which then is conducive to creating a sense of security and togetherness. The major shortcomings arise from the discrepancies between linguistic legislation and practical reality, leading to a situation where the requirements of the Language Act are not fulfilled, and many of its provisions remain inoperative. Legally, this is an unsatisfactory situation, to say the least. Accordingly, during the reform there is good cause to consider how the discrepancy is to be solved in a practicable manner.