You name it - women are being victimized by it. For instance, I read earlier in the year that some women's groups were insisting that changes be made on the SAT tests because school girls were not scoring high enough. What Leo said applies on a much broader scale. Much of the reporting, although factual to a degree, carefully omits many other related facts. Today, on the front page of many U.S. newspapers, nationwide, is an article by New York Times writer, Tamar Lewin, about the recent report by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Gender gap grows wider.
The results don't surprise me in the least. June O'Neill, the Republican-appointed head of the Congressional Budget Office, Jared Bernstein, an economist at the Economic Policy Institute and Marvin Kosters, an economist at the American Enterprise Institute, did not mention any of the thirteen reasons Farrell brought to light over four years ago. Even those without a college degree make the same sorts of choices. One of the most noticeable aspects of articles like today's is that there is no specific job or profession discussed - period. The more vague the implications, and the more the writer and their sources can ramble on and on about all sorts of intangibles, the better the apparent effect of the propaganda.