At the age of six she could not relate number words, finger and objects in counting. These errors still persist in the classroom situation. This investigation shows that nevertheless her concept of cardinality is fairly highly developed. She knows that in counting she must match number words and objects one to one, the number word sequence she uses ist stable, and her insight into the irrelevance of order of enumeration when counting, which she finds by trial, is a sign of the robustness of her cardinal concept. She also understands the relationships of equivalence and order of sets, and she solves arithmetical problems by counting on or down, which means that she understands the number words as cardinal and at the same time as sequence numbers.
Errors occur in complex situations, where several components have to be considered.
These difficulties must be interpreted as a consequence of her special weakness concerning synthetic thinking and simultaneous performing, as similar patterns can be seen in her spatial perception and in her speech. In the syntactic structure of her utterances, too, the combination of simple entities to complicated units is replaced by a mere concatenation. This means that due to brain dysfunction her behavior is determined by a particular pattern which repeatedly appears intrapersonally, and which is characteristic of some mentally retarded persons though not of all of them. Evidently mathematical thinking is also not a determined system, but a variable one. Mentally retarded students may therefore have great difficulties concerning some areas and at the same time make better progress in others.