Make each answer integral, so that I can read it without reference to the exercise or the question itself. Burbules and Callister discuss several ways that higher education has misunderstood high tech. That high tech can't be relied on to work well - machines are often broken. Poor schools often have less access to the needed equipment. People tend to expect that high tech is the answer to all our educational problems.
High tech is really just a marketing ploy.
None of the above. That the computer is a neutral tool. That people, not the computer, are the problem. That new technologies bring unintended problems along with the intended solutions. That it is a sign of progress that students no longer need to know math to do statistics.