Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5, California. Nov. 15, 1993. The Superior Court, Humboldt County, No. 91CP0244, Leighton Hatch, J., dismissed petition, and organization appealed.
EPIC objects to the dismissal on two procedural grounds.
We find no merit to EPIC's contentions. In affirming the order of dismissal, we hold that, after an alternative writ of mandate is fully complied with by the respondent, the issuing court retains no continuing jurisdiction in such proceedings over the subject matter of the writ petition. Forestry did not accept the THP for filing because it did not contain sufficient surveys of wildlife species potentially affected by the logging. The THP was resubmitted October 15, 1990. A pelagic bird is one which lives at sea beyond the continental shelf, feeding on plankton, and returns to coastal redwood habitats only to nest.