One, no academic historian is ever going to say True History, so it seems to me that it's clear that this is not an academic work of a historian. The second thing is that by putting true and history together, it seems to me that it questions history, it suggests an argument. If you can say true history, there must be some other history that's not true. There have been untrue histories. So it feels passionate and argumentative.
History is stories.
Also, it seems to me to be in Ned's voice. It seemed like something scratched with a nail. Okay, I'll bite. I'll be dead. Globe Interactive, a division of Bell Globemedia Publishing Inc. Protected by copyright.