I do not wish to argue with fundamentalist creationists because their arguments are not rational, they are based on faith and faith alone. Challenging that faith usually just gets them mad, and proves nothing. On the other hand, some of the modern arguments I have seen against Darwinism and natural selection strike me as encapsulating elements of creationist faith cloaked in an imposing hull of modern-sounding verbiage. Where I detect such poison pills in their arguments, I shall say so, and let the fur fly from there. Things run down.
Evolution works in the opposite direction.
The immediate, common sense answer is that gravity is a universal law too, but we still have airplanes that go up. I don't have to be an aircraft engineer to appreciate the fact that airplanes do actually fly. Similarly, I don't have to explain the exact relationship between evolution and entropy to appreciate the fact that things do evolve in spite of entropy. The existence of entropy in other words is not a valid argument against believing that biological organisms evolve through a process known as natural selection. All the entropy concept does is introduce questions as to how things work.