The organicists claim that culture consists the forms and processes of behaviour which man acquires through his innate potentialities. And hence it is a subjective or personal attribute - a state of quality attributed to an organism. The superorganicists, on the other hand, hold that culture is the subjective product of man's cultivation of the natural objects of his environment. And as objects for artifacts exist independently of the organism, they are described as superorganic. It is also claimed that the superorganic products are endowed with efficient power, that is, they make or develop themselves according to their own natural laws.
Man is a part of nature.
Creativity has a wide range. I quite agree. In the other two forms of culture there is a built environment, disconnected with nature, where the system of man and the system of machine are in conflict. Think of a chaotic system where any small difference between two identical systems grow rapidly. The hallmark of chaos is that the two notions diverge exponentially fast.