Darwinism, for better or worse, happened to have become the chief representative of the scientific alternative to religious dogma. This ridiculous experiment was based upon the presumption that Weismann was a fully qualified representative of the environment . Lamarckism holds that evolution is a product of interactivity between organism and environment. More needs to be said about the Weismann compromise. As an event, it represents not simply a case of over-zealousness, but the continuation of a fateful betrayal of the integrity of science that began with the Cuvier attack on Lamarck.
Evolution is a matter of interactivity between organism and environment.
The cell membrane, therefore, may be likened unto a radio receiver. The Neo-Darwinian view that the DNA is origin of all biological expression simply ignores that possibility that the cellular membrane has something to do with biological expression. In the past few years, a number of research projects have demonstrated specific mechanisms by which environmental signaling affects the genetic structure directly. As it becomes increasingly obvious that primacy is in the environment and that physiological primacy is in the cellular membrane and not the DNA, the orthodoxy is casting about for new ways of defending the DNA primacy doctrine. If the nucleus and its genetic materials was in fact the origin of all biological expression, then we would expect that the removal of the same would cause the death of the cell.