See id. at 425. See id. at 425-26. Although neither Classified nor Janikowski addressed circumstances quite like those of the instant case, taken together, they all but mandate our rejection of the Prophets' argument. Classified establishes that Wis. Stat. 186 Wis.2d at 483.
Enterprise is a self-insured entity.
No statute requires Enterprise, a self-insured entity, to provide uninsured motorist coverage as part of the optional insurance it offers its customers. Thus, notwithstanding the distinguishing factors of each case, we conclude that Classified and Janikowski , read together, defeat the Prophets' theory. We can appreciate the Prophets' concerns, and we do understand that they and others who occupy rental vehicles, for which optional insurance coverage has been purchased, may be surprised to learn of the limits of the coverage. Still, in this case, the limitations were clearly stated in the rental agreement. 187 Wis.2d at 430.