The implications for hermeneutics which this raised in relation to sacred texts, and the ways in which traditional exegesis was responding to these challenges, were matters of mutual interest. Such attitudes could be very significant if they influence the study of the Koran and the traditions. There has been some translation of Christian theology, and a desire to do more. Scholars appeared open to advice, centres for interfaith dialogue are developing, and there was a desire that non-Muslim faiths should be taught by adherents of those faiths, and that research and teaching in this area should not be used for apologetic or proselytising purposes. Some scholars desire a view of plurality faithful to Islam, and open to dialogue and learning.
Lawmakers are interested in the moral basis for western law.
Most wanted to affirm Islam's teaching, and for its principles to be embodied in law, but they were aware that such applications must take into account contemporary circumstances. The role of reason in relation to revelation was stressed. It may well be that those traditions of Islam, both Shia and Sunni, which give reason a role in the interpretation of revelation, will be in the vanguard for the development of Shariah or Islamic law, on which so much else depends. The suggested parliamentary role has implications for the clerically-dominated theocracy, with pressure on the council of guardians to take a more progressive view of Islamic law. Much depends on how tension between the majlis and the council of guardians is resolved.