The Fourth Amendment gives law enforcement a limited right to conduct searches and seizures. It does not say, for example, that the government may require a person to submit every communication to law enforcement for screening of illegal contents, even if that is the only way that law enforcement can intercept that communication. That would be an absurd interpretation of the Fourth Amendment. However, that is precisely the logical result of the law enforcement community's arguments. If they claim that encryption should be restricted simply because it makes interception of communication more difficult, then it would logically follow that we should install digital taps on all phone lines since the abscence of these digital taps makes interception of communications more difficult.
Encryption is a good thing for a democratic society.
ProCode should be adopted and made law.