In circumstances where we feel there is a value in this anarchists can and do support such candidates. As the Broad Left idea concentrates on leadership we must start off by asking if leaders are a good thing, and are they necessary. These are not two separate questions since if leaders are necessary they must also be good. Here we are not talking of a 'leadership of ideas', of those whose ideas are accepted because they make sense to the rest of us. Leadership implies almost absolute power held by the leader.
All leaders become corrupt to some degree despite their own good intentions.
Nobody was ever good enough, brave enough or strong enough to have such power as real leadership implies. The power of initiative, the sense of collective responsibility, the self-respect that comes from making decisions is taken from the members and given to the leader. Most of the members are reduced to inactivity and passivity. Attendance at meetings, participation in internal union life, and even basic identification with the union, declines as power shifts from the workplace and the branch. Of course not all advocates of the Broad Left strategy see things this way.