There is only a modest variance between public and private comments about the matters considered by the group Discussion is characterized by adequate completeness, preciseness, relevance, verifiability, and timeliness of information exchanged. The group uses various decision modes appropriately, with most important decisions made by consensus. Assignments to members are clear and accepted. The group creates a way to monitor its progress and hold itself accountable, individually and jointly, for both results and its process. Their relative advantages in a particular situation are contingent on many factors.
Individuals involved can learn and develop from the experience.
Consensus decision making requires more time and effort, but is worth this investment for important and precedent- setting decisions. Consensus is difficult to reach, will require more time than many other methods of deciding an issue, and ordinarily would be the decision process primarily for more important decisions with long-term implications. There are various degrees of consensus - in practical situations, there will seldom be complete accord. In the group process, balance advocacy and inquiry. Recognize an obligation to present and advocate your tentative position, listen to the opinions and feelings of all other group members, inquire to sincerely learn about the opinions of others, and be ready to modify your own position on the basis of what is discussed in the group.