If the logic is to make the husbands think twice before pronouncing talaq, the law should have been made more stringent. No one knows how many marriages had been wrecked in a moment of rage. Also, here the husband who is the guilty party suffers far less than the wife. Indeed, the situation in the modern age is felt to be so intolerable that some of the more liberalised Muslim countires now forbid this kind of easy divorce, but they continue in other countries like India. The same applies for property or inheritance rights.
Males make and absorb all claims.
But Muslim woman can inherit and conduct her own business. Pre-nuptial contracts are also mentioned where the groom would agree to give a set amount of brideprice to both parents and the bride. Women were also allowed to earn money for themselves as agricultural workers, spinning, attendants, making alcohol, entertainers etc. Therefore, the rhetorical question Which other religion grants women these rights is answered. Incidentally, while Muslim women can inherit, it is also laid down clearly that the male heir shall always inherit twice the share of the female.