I haven't figured out how to recreate it for an automatic response so this would save me time and might be generally interesting enough. I assume because it was a personal request and I responded directly that you wouldn't have seen it. These are generally handed down to us outside of our awareness by the cultures we are initiated into. What has those cultures be strong and stable is that they have hidden the foundations or meta-narratives from view, from questioning, from challenge. That is, anything that is said or written can be starting place and only a small section of text is required because it will reflect the whole meta-narrative when explored.
Deconstruction is the process of analyzing what is said in continuous iterative loops.
Given that, we should just begin at whatever seems the best place and let it unfold. Hence my previous comments about starting at the top or starting at the bottom as hiding what is relevant behind what is not. The postmodern writers are very difficult to read. I have them translated via dialogue for me by a wonderful philosopher who is my mentor. Some of the main philsophers of the domain are Derrida, DeLueze, Lyotard, Habermas, Foucault, Baudrillard and Quine.