The honest scientist would be wise to admit that no evidence exists that could begin to prove the dog and the fish have a common ancestor. He may believe that they are related but that is not science and that is my point in the offer. Further, it certainly is not evidence that the other four definitions of evolution have occurred. The idea that the majority of scientists believe in the theory is not evidence either. Majority opinion is often wrong and must be corrected.
History is full of examples.
Anonymous letters will be ignored. It is obvious they are using the Red Herring tactic to draw attention away from the fact that they have no evidence to support the religion of evolution. I tell everyone who inquires, if you have some evidence, send it in, don't beat around the bush. Give us the best you have on the first try to save time, please. Many have offered evidence of microevolution and assumed that the other 5 meanings of the word are somehow magically connected.