The lesson is that it's more difficult to debate the fairness of application than the fairness of rule making. Where information on membership is hard to obtain due to lack of written documents, things get murky indeed. The most effective entrancism usually takes this form. Enclosure Entrancism selects those candidates most likely to fit into the present order. It espouses keeping the status quo as a much more important consideration than profitability.
Enclosure enables insiders to monopolize deals, and takes various forms.
The lifetime employment system has been an effective tool for enclosing human resources within a certain company. Enclosure avoids check and balance from outsiders. The individual players as well as the group as a whole enjoy a check-free paradise. Neither the legislature nor the judiciary exercise enough power to monitor arbitrary administrative decisions. Japanese companies have managed to avoid serious pressure from stockholders, labor unions, and consumer groups.