Case law, or high court decisions, are also an important source for solutions. Courts interpret and resolve ambiguities in legislated law. Most state and federal courts have had some discussion about privacy rights, or the rights of patients to deny or choose medical treatments, evidentiary standards, or due process. Where case law favors your cause, language for your bill can be lifted directly from the decision itself. Where case law is not favorable, dissenting opinion may provide you with an argument, or you may find conflicts between decisions.
Legislators like to resolve judicial conflicts.
Most often non-conventional doctors are not charged with using an alternative treatment per say, but rather, with improper physical or history taking, or improper record keeping because the practical aspects of alternative therapies affects these three activities profoundly. We found that it was often by these means that charges were initially brought and then, in the midst of the disciplinary procedure, that nature of the practice would be condemned as insufficient itself. It takes a true peer on the review panel to spot what record keeping is appropriate for the given diagnosis and treatment, or insufficient under any circumstance. Language An important aspect of solution finding is what language is used. When there is disagreement as to the meaning of a word, it's not advisable to use it.