You can, however, test whether it is possible to form life from nonlife, and whether it is possible to get a fish to sire a salamander. These tests have been run tens of thousands of times, all without success. Conversely, every complex system whose origin we have observed has been created, by a creator who was essentially different from, transcendent to the system. The Legal Method does apply to historical events. There are no documents about the first fish for evolutionists, but there is extensive documentation for creation.
Evolutionists claim it supports their faith.
While a review is far beyond the scope of this essay, I assert categorically that a review of the physical evidence supports Biblical Creation far better than it does evolution, and without witnesses or documentary evidence, no sensible jurist would ever convict. When it is applied, evolution cannot be deduced either logically or mathematically. Everyone is familiar with the silly results obtained from attempts to apply it to less well understood populations, such as is done in opinion surveys. Furthermore, all honest attempts to test the probability of evolution events such as protein by random processes, life by random processes, the horse series, the eye by random processes, etc. The method has considerable merit, but like the others is subject to misapplication.