At the meeting you were of the opinion that such was too much detail. I agree with that. 802.11 members are sufficiently aware of their rights in order to vote NO if they disagree. At the SEC meeting, I felt people wanting to do so, and especially from a non-company related counsel. I would have asked my own counsel else.
Editorials are always possible.
They can also warn against undiplomatic phrases. I was already asking that in my e-mails. Will be in LA till 6 AM Monday. Thanks a lot.