This is one reason why the waste station is so important and necessary in any event, be it incineration in Mozambique or export to Europe. I am somewhat puzzled as to your opposition to building a waste station that shall enable the authorities to analyse and store hazardous waste. In conclusion on this, I fail to see the logic in arguing that the costs related to a waste station and disposal are unnecessary as they are in fact unavoidable. The bottom line is that during our debate over the last eight months we have gone through the same arguments again and again. As I have said before, Danida can and will not use a technology which has not been approved by the relevant authorities of this country, and which does not have a proven record of performance.
Incineration is the only reasonable solution which has been presented so far.
To refuse Danida to assist Mozambique in getting rid of a major risk in a way which lives up to the standard for incineration in the EU while at the same time trying to avoid such problems in future by co-operating on the introduction of cleaner technologies certainly is a clear example of the best becoming the enemy of the good. This is still a reasonable way of characterising the high pitched opposition you continue to mount against the project.