I'm beginning to wonder. They already had proven themselves to be Starr-friendly, which was why he chose THEM to do the dirty deed. Get a grip. Your article doesn't make a lot of sense, to me. I'd love a reply.
Liberals have their lifestyles.
They did not say that non-Baptist wives must be nurturing and manage the household. Like many on the 'net, I don't think any media-coined buzzword describes my political beliefs. The plain fact of the matter is that the Baptists are one of the clearest examples I see of a patriarchy in Western society reducing the role of women to child-bearers, and from a basic human rights point of view I cannot support that. All of those measures apply whether you're a Southern Baptist or not, so for Mr. Wilson to say that there is no threat of having Baptist religious beliefs enforced upon you if you're not a baptist is a profound mistruth. I'd suggest that he examine his loyalties and reassess his criticism of us critics.