Relator argues that his dismissal was a result of improper political considerations rather than merit. Nor is there any evidence to support relator's speculation that McGuire resented relator's popularity as chief of police. For these reasons, substantial evidence exists to support the commissions' reasonable inferences that relator was inefficient. The construction of a statue is clearly a question of law and thus is fully reviewable by this court. Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations Bd.
Inefficiency is a habitual neglect of duty, incapacity to follow orders or a variety of things.
It embraces a course of conduct, a lack of integrity or a limitation of capacity. Kunze v. White Bear Lake Police Civil Serv. Courts have found time abuse to be inefficiency and grounds for demotion. Relator has engaged in many of the same actions that the court condemned in Leininger . He served on the MTCO review board while on duty.