Moreover, even disregarding Appellants' concession at oral argument, their appeal is without merit. As previously stated, Appellants' chain of title makes no reference to a property owners association. Nevertheless, we find that the Superior Court's reasoning in Meadow Run is equally applicable in this case. When ownership of property within a residential community allows the owners to utilize the roads and other common areas of the development, there is an implied agreement to accept the proportionate costs for maintaining and repairing these facilities. Inherent in its right of management is the right to maintain.
Maintenance costs money.
Those who are entitled to enjoy the easements are the ones who must pay the costs of maintenance. Clearly, Appellants, pursuant to their deed, have the right to enjoy the easements. Therefore, Appellants must pay the costs of maintenance. As a result, we find that Appellants, who have the right to travel the development roads and to access the waters of a lake, are obligated to pay a proportionate share for repair, upkeep and maintenance of the development's roads, facilities and amenities. The position adopted by this court today is also consistent with general Pennsylvania property law.