Together ,these decision tools help guide the process of identifying funding options and linking these options to required actions in a systematic approach. This methodology allows NEP managers to draw on experience with other NEP programs as well as incorporate local circumstances through workshops with stakeholders and the public. Most NEPs do the first step very well. Clearly, even a small loss in value associated with degradation could jeopardize the strength of local economies, thus pointing to the importance of the implementation of CCMP actions. A final and crucial aspect to development of an NEP funding strategy is the role of institutions.
Institutions can facilitate financing and implementation of estuary projects and programs.
They can range from dedicated trust funds to organizations that directly facilitate implementation of AFMs selected. Institutional mechanisms also can facilitate or enable strategies that will reduce costs or increase revenues. The creation of an estuary-related institution can be particularly useful for serving as a focal point for the ecosystem that is being protected. The founding of an institution creates an identity for the ecosystem, which is critical to inspiring changes in polluting behavior. Separation of funds from the local or state general funds can protect pooled revenues from the annual appropriations procedures.