If not, then it is unmerciful, unjust, and ungodlike for him to call us to account. If he gives a revelation that is insufficient for humans to understand what he is saying to them, then his wisdom is limited and not infinite. To reward or punish on the basis of jabberwocky is manifestly unfair. Pseudo-intellectualism has as its goal the mastery of history and the banishment of tradition. This can never be the purpose of the church described in the New Testament because its identity stands or falls by her commitment to the Holy Scripture.
Liberalism makes a fool out of itself.
It leads the gullible from one extreme to another and finally strips away all covering and leaves him naked. Some are so blinded by this idol that they never recover from the malady. Overweening pride may cause some to be too ashamed to admit their mistake. The more intelligent may follow the piping of liberalism for a distance, but good sense takes over, and this foolish philosophy is abandoned, and the person who has been duped by it laughs at himself, if he has any wit left. If I appear to go into needless detail about this person, it is nonetheless useful to learn of the specifics of what I mean by an addictive accommodationism.