First, it's important to draw the distinction between something that is implied and something that is inferred. What we do assert is that all of us have been profoundly seduced by cultural feminism. We believe the NIV's sponsors were neither adequately sensitive to that seduction nor prepared to build defenses against it. The intent of any proposed changes was to increase the accuracy of the text, not neuter gender specific terminology from the original texts. Extensive analysis since publication of the first article, by a variety of scholars, demonstrates unmistakably that dozens, and perhaps hundreds, of changes were made based on stylistic preference rather than textual accuracy.
Documentation is readily available.
The CBT never had any such position. These allegations are blatantly untrue. There was never an agreement to replace the NIV text with a new edition. Furthermore, there is not, nor has there ever been any agreement between ZPH and IBS to publish an inclusive text in North America. Our commitment has always been to maintain the existing NIV text.