This is, as best I can express it, an area of confusion and inconsistency, typified by having characteristics of both ends of the spectrum. The first stop on the real right is typified by wanting to promote many of the concepts of freedom of the individual and lessening of the state's power over same. Yet the traditional conservative still believes that government should try to control things that are immoral even when this is patently impossible, such as in the case of the new Prohibition against drug use. Home, sweet home. Libertarianism is as far right as you can get without being an anarchist.
Libertarians advocate maximum individual freedom, initiative, and self reliance.
Which means absolutely minimalist central government. Although, as I stated above, conservatism holds the moral ground, I do not believe government either can or should try to legislate morality in any way, shape, or form. Cage felons and repel foreign invaders and forget everything else. Don't even pay remote lipservice to any of the dead manifestos of collectivists. Anarchism is the farthest point on the scale of the relationship of the individual to the state.