But be that as it may. Some laws might be more precise than others, but all Revisionists are asking is that all be treated equally according to existing laws. But as per usual, Jews want to have a double standard. In the early 1980s, the CJC had called for removing the requirement that the provincial attorney general must consent to certain anti-hate prosecutions. As anyone who has ever faced a criminal trial can readily testify, it's a harrowing ordeal.
Eventual acquittal can never adequately obliterate the experience.
Yet when Bronfman called Austrians a nation of dirty anti-Semitic dogs during a Montreal speech attended by Austrians in this country, the police and attorney generals of Ontario and Quebec were too intimidated to charge Bronfman. And they have tried to do it ever since - and ever since, various attorney generals have said Nyet while trembling in their moccasins, taking abuse and vilification heaped on them for not doing the Lobby's shrill bidding. The risk could be triggered by the ways in which Jews decide to deal with the disquieting signs of resurgent anti-semitism in Europe and elsewhere. One way to counteract these trends is to pressure the governments in North America to take retaliatory action against those foreign governments that either unduly encourage or inadequately address anti-semitic activities within their borders. This will require mobilizing public opinion here at home.