A conclusion requires evidence to support it and findings of appropriate definiteness to express it. See also Lister v. This was neither a complex nor extended hearing, but nevertheless required a careful analysis and the requisite findings to insure a just result. Fact-finding is just that. It is not a recitation of statutory citations but a clear and concise demonstration that the litigants have been heard and their arguments considered.
Justice requires no less.
Nowhere does the Appeals Tribunal or the Board address, discuss, or make separate findings on the issue of duress, a failing which we simply cannot overlook. We remand this matter to the Board for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction. We assume from the general discussion as well as other conflicting references that appellant is a male. This archive is a service of Rutgers School of Law - Camden.