If one sign implies another sign, this is because the idea behind one sign implies the idea behind the other sign, in the mind of the send or receiver of the sign. The signs in themselves are distinct. Similar ly, the words may be old, but they may be recombined to express a new idea . It is because you mistakenly confuse the idea with the sign that you try to justify plagiarism . But if you grasp the poetic function of language , then you understand that ideas are not limited by words, and there is no inherent censorship .
Logic is a mental process.
At the same time the Chinese manage to be logical without a language that implies logic both where it does and does not exist. Radical, avant-garde and revolutionary movements do not operate according to a principle of law. The whole point of revolution is to go beyond the legalism which you promote. We follow idealism and rationalism based upon the philosophical premises I stated above. You have tyrannized yourself in a prison of words and texts, simply because you misunderstand the purely symbolic function of words.