I suspect you have a different take on that. We have a variety of ways to engage between the United States military and the militaries of other nations. The whole purpose is engagement. You are either involved in a dialogue with the militaries of other nations or you're not. No one expects that every effort will be 100 percent successful, but the alternative is having zero voice, zero chance of success in any sort of a negotiation or a discussion with a U.S. military person's counterpart in another nation.
Human beings react well to faces that they have seen before.
People with whom they have had a conversation before. The old cliche about an emergency or a crisis is not the best time to place that first phone call to a person with whom you've never had any relationship is absolutely true. We have had a very limited IMET program with the military of Indonesia. In numbers of students, if you compare it with other nations like the Philippines and Thailand, we've got ten times as many students engaged in IMET programs with those nations as we do with Indonesia. So don't look to Indonesia as this very limited program of IMET to be an example of how a robust program ought to work because this one has been very limited.