For years he has kept copious notes and diaries recording instances which he believes will show the mother in a negative light. . . . When asked that question, it was apparent that he had given the subject no consideration whatsoever. Based upon the evidence, including the testimony of the parties, and after considering the statutory factors, the trial court granted Hicks' motion to modify visitation. The circuit court's decision was based upon its evaluation of the testimony heard ore tenus and its determination of the child's best interests. The trial court also considered but rejected Zampolin's Motion for Reconsideration, in which Zampolin raised at length the arguments on which he based this portion of his appeal.
Credible evidence supports the trial court's factual determinations.
We find no grounds to reverse the trial court's exercise of its discretion authority. Accordingly, the decision of the circuit court is summarily affirmed.