See Luke i. This is how Mr. Dodgson renders, and the rendering agrees with Oehler's punctuation. 184 See vol. Probably they do, but had he written the tract as a professed Mointanist, they would have been much less ambiguous, in all probability. At all events, a work so colourless that doctors can disagree about even its shading, must be regarded as practically orthodox.
Exaggerated expressions are but the characteristics of the author's genius.
We find the like in all writers of strongly marked individuality. See Bunsen, Hippol .