I causes malignant transformation of normal human cells. Accusations of carcinogenesis are the most blatant form of scare mongering and the consequences of publication of such allegations can be devastating for a product and the company that markets it. If Akre and Wilson are aware of any evidence that is scientifically valid and contradicts the numerous studies that have shown no threat to human health in milk from rBST treated cows, Monsanto scientists would like to see it and be able to discuss it with them before any such claim is made in a television broadcast. If a Monsanto product which has been thoroughly researched, tested and approved by the FDA and similar agencies in other countries is going to be linked to cancer or other human disease in a broadcast by a Fox Network station, the evidence upon which that claim is based should, in fact, be made available not only to Monsanto's scientists but other independent experts in the field for analysis and conunent before any such material is published. Peer review is a basic protocol of scientific research.
Good journalism requires no less.
There is a lot at stake in what is going on in Florida, not only for Monsanto, but also for Fox News and its owner, as well as for the American people and a world population that can benefit significantly from the use of rBST and other products of agricultural biotechnology. Now is the time to get a level playing field here. I can assure you that Monsanto will be pleased to cooperate with you and your news executives to get the facts straight about this highly complex subject. I am prepared to discuss the matter with you, any of your news executives, or your counsel at any time and look forward to hearing from you.