Imposing order from the top is not suitable for egalitarian society like Somalia . In such environment it's only natural to start things from the bottom and aim for higher. The scheme of hosting peace conference in a foreign country and bringing along few retarded singers and unemployed exiles, whom only the emotional part of their brain is still active while the logic section has long taken a break is tempting but not practical. Picking someone from such gathering and eventually appointing to the highest position in the country is also nothing but an attempt to rule the nation with foreign aid. It only took less than six month for Somalis to run havoc in the previous concept of world order once it was tested on them in the 90s.
Lets wait and see if bribery works where power had failed.
What the UN calls a government has not been legally elected by the Somali public. These two regions with their locally elected governments, comprise about at least a third of the total population of Somalia. Externally, despite all the propaganda produced by the UN to secure international recognition for their protege, the response to date has rightly been cautious. Although it is apparently receiving some material support from Arab sources, only the Sudan, sensitive to Mr Abdulkasim's Islamicist flavour, has so far recognised his regime. And since there are not enough seats at the ministerial level to satiate the well known appetite of the participants for miss-appropriating aid monies, the likelihood for this government to succeed and bring about lasting peace in Somalia are minuscule.