It is curious that theists require perfect evidence from science but don't need the slightest bit to justify their beliefs. At least 40 fundamentally different eye designs exist in nature and the spectrum for eyesight in nature covers the entire range from barely able to perceive light to vision humans can't even comprehend. There is no need to say that half an eye in terms of functionality isn't worth anything in nature. He also forgets to bring up the point that the human eye is not nearly as useful as those of many other animals. Science can provide correct answers to these questions.
Creationism does nothing but create more unanswerable questions.
Denton attempts to make scientific arguments over minor details in how natural selection proceeds look like the entire fact of natural selection is in question. He distorts Gould and 'punctured equilibrium' theorists to make false claims about the fossil record. Beginning on page 74, and throughout the rest of the book, Denton performs some serious spin doctoring of words. This reminds me of the tactics used by Phillip Johnson who has misnamed a couple of his books with titles such as, Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds and Reason in the Balance . Open minds and reason are required by the science these Christian apologists are trying to redefine in their own image.