A series of discussion questions on the topic follow. The leader will outline some of the issues that usually arise in such litigation. The focus group members then give their opinions on these issues and other issues that they feel are important. The general discussion approach is often used as a first step in the evaluation of litigation in its early stages. The comments from the group members are evaluated, and form the basis for the implementation of more specific projects such as juror profile surveys, trial simulations, or more refined focus groups.
Information limited to the instant lawsuit is considered by a case-specific focus group.
Such information can be in the form of sample opening statements, videotaped summary presentations, or physical evidence which may be used at trial. For example, if the litigation concerns an allegedly defective lawnmower, the focus group can be presented with opening statements addressing both sides of the dispute, along with an opportunity to view the lawnmower in issue. Based on this information, the group discusses general issues in products liability, as well as their opinions and perceptions of the product itself. This feedback can be crucial in understanding how jurors view certain products cases. Another case-specific approach is to test different versions of the opening statements, legal arguments, or evidence that might be used in the actual trial on focus groups to determine their probable impact on jurors.