Experience teaches otherwise. There seem to be countless examples one could come up which would contraindicate homeopathy as a reasonable approach to the treatment of disease. One of the stranger tenets of homeopathy, proposed by Dr. Hahnemann himself, is that the potency of a remedy increases as the drug becomes more and more dilute. Homeopathy's supporters point to clinical trials which indicate a homeopathic efficacy that cannot be explained by the placebo effect. Critics contend that such studies are poorly designed, methodologically biased, statistically flawed, etc.
Homeopathic advocates give ardent testimonials to the curative powers of their remedies.
Left alone, the body often heals itself. And, unlike traditional medicine with its powerful drugs and antibiotics, the likelihood of an adverse reaction to a homeopathic remedy is remote. The main harm from homeopathy is not likely to come from its remedies, which are probably safe but ineffective. One potential danger is in the encouragement to self-diagnosis and treatment. Another is not getting proper treatment by a traditional medical doctor in those cases where the patient could be helped by such treatment, such as for a bladder or yeast infection, or for cancer.