Karen Narasaki, executive director of the Washington-based National Asian Pacific American Legal Consortium, praised the court. This ruling will have a national impact. We have all been watching Arizona. Supporters of Arizona's law, however, called the decision a mistake. Chavez disputes that such laws are discriminatory or in violation of the First Amendment.
Language is a mutable characteristic.
People learn different languages. Quite a stretch' The Arizona legal community, meanwhile, is of different minds on the ruling. However, Paul Bender, former dean of the ASU law school, thinks the First Amendment argument is a good one, especially when applied to communication between elected officials and their constituents. I don't think the First Amendment challenge is trivial. In some cases, its overwhelming.