Intelnet Int'l Corp., et al. Neither the federal District Court nor the state court addressed the merits of the case, which is currently closed. Second, Intelnet contends that the court should abstain from exercising jurisdiction pursuant to the Colorado River Doctrine. See , e.g. Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. The court will address each argument separately.
Defendants bear the burden of proving that transfer is appropriate.
Superior Precast, Inc. v. Safeco Ins. 71 F. Supp. Jumara v. State Farm Ins. The burden of establishing that the balance of proper interests weighs in favor of transfer rests with the movant. Intelnet does not dispute that this court is a valid forum.