I remember when there was nothing under that wing. The physical plan hasn't changed much. I don't think that the quality of the education program has changed - it's always been strong and the kids have always done well. I remember seeing Lexington kids at Fisher, and they didn't stand out as any worse or better, on the average, than any of the other schools. Also, I'd like to get some people from Fisher to answer some of the concerns that parents have about the transition from Lexington to Fisher, as well as talk about developmental issues.
Honest communication is important.
Working for the common good, instead of addressing personal agendas. You can accommodate each other by examining what we're trying to collectively achieve in order to arrive at a given goal. This helps all concerned to keep in mind why we are here. We're here for the children, and if we make our choices and decisions based on what's good for children, then I think we'll look pretty good. In such a small, intimate community we're in a better position to make choices that are good for kids.