Yet, if chance is a matter of perspective, then it does not necessarily follow that our existence is a result of chance . It appears that everything that comes about is a matter of perspective rather than chance. However, one could argue that Joe would have been better off if he had not had the realization to climb Mount Everest, because he was killed by an avalanche on the mountain. Though obviously any distinction between right or wrong, better or worse is subjective, and yet by the same token, the claim that we are no better or worse for anything is subjective as well. I think one thing that is coming out of this discussion is that human beings are the creators, within reason, of their own existence.
Justice is racism.
It is separation. It is stereotyping. Even if justice is individualistic, the mere fact that individuals exist as a collective, there has to be compromise. So I would say that justice, or law, is a necessary means for social union. The important question from my view, is determining what is a necessary law, which reflects the individuals and the collection of them.