Most New Testament scholars say that it is talking about the maturing of the church or the writing of the New Testament. Scholars have debated for many years over the meaning of this language in the original Greek text, but the results of this debate have not been conclusive. Some critics of the Charismatic Movement, therefore, have been reluctant to use the argument based on this passage. But there is another way to determine when the miraculous gifts were supposed to end. The rhetorical structure of Paul's argument shows clearly that he was not talking about the second coming of Jesus Christ.
Love is permanent.
It never fails. But prophecy would be done away, tongues would cease and the miraculous revelation of knowledge would end. Miracles were a part of the temporary. Miracles were associated with knowing and prophesying in part, the immaturity of a child, and seeing only a dim reflection in a mirror. Faith, hope and love are more permanent than miraculous signs.