Sure, it's dirty pool to equate circumcision of male babies with disfigurement of young women. And to question circumcision too forcefully is to tread on some thorny religious and cultural ground. But there's a serious anthropological question here - the spread of circumcision in an overwhelmingly gentile population. At the very least, this suggests those damn Europeans may be right - we really are all hung up about sex. There are many arguments for circumcision, and to put them in perspective, keep in mind that the first one was propounded by Corn Flakes inventor and maniac Dr. John Harvey Kellogg, who believed a deftly wielded pair of scissors would cure the masturbation epidemic of the 19th century.
Later arguments are more high-minded, if no less wacky.
That sounds like decidedly less fun to me, but never mind, since there's no evidence for this theory either. Most persuasive is the aesthetic argument. But in the battle to maintain a phallocracy, American men are clearly losing. On the other hand, many women claim to find a clipped dingus more attractive. And it's only fair that women have some say in deciding what's a good-looking wang.