All are questions that jurors may wonder about but seldom get to ask. Again, neither the questions nor the answers are unusual or objectionable. It's not a new debate. It's one that's been argued by judges, trial lawyers and prosecutors for over 300 years. But the Constitution gives them that right and the lawyers and judges can only grumble and whine about it.
Jury nullification is discussed in all law schools.
Enter the words in your search engine and you'll see about 2000 places to read up on the subject. Sure we are, we just don't agree on which ones are the bad ones. No one had to take it or read it. But if they did, there is nothing bad or illegal about the information in any of the three handouts. Judge Wiggins had a confrontation about these handouts a couple of years ago and lost - he was reminded of the First Amendment the hard way.