For people like Gould, Krishtalka and Shountz , who cannot begin to design a single living cell, to critique the design of these items tells you more about their arrogance than their science. Evolutionists always try to impose their own views of functionality on God. Each of these evidences against creation has many serious flaws. The fact that Schountz doesn't understand this reflects more on his ignorance of design strategies than it does on his brilliance in proving God did not design antifreeze proteins. I would be much more impressed if Schountz had designed and built a frog which had survived a few thousand years using antifreeze proteins.
Frogs do both.
When God redesigned the entire Cosmos to implement the curse, He obviously did so in a manner to prevent man from subverting His plan via technology. They do not prove evolution, they confirm a master creator, with a decay goal. Remember, as you reflect on these that they are merely the responses I could think of. But I cannot design a frog either. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.