This forces the antimedial to invent tactics for the wilful takeover of the media, in order to prevent distorted reports from causing confusion. The final dilemma of any antimedial strategy lies in the fact that it must maintain the media if it is to save democracy. The problem of the antimedial movement is how to employ the media without becoming a part of them. Perhaps the media never possessed either transmitters or receivers to begin with. It requires little effort to imagine a network that functions to perfection, unaided by operators or users, free of input or output.
Images have no meaning whatsoever to start with - they merely exist.
To them, it's all shit and onions. Still, the continuing broadcast of signals remains a persistent source of annoyance and aggression. The antimedial movement is the media's ultimate issue. The third option, that of extramedial acts, is based on the presumption that all positive activist goals are ultimately defensive, and can only reinforce the conservative climate. Any medially discernable goals served by extramedial actions are utterly negative.