You produced it to satisfy your desire for bread. You can grind the wheat into flour, bake the loaf of bread, eat it, or share it with your family or a friend. Or you sell half the bushel of wheat for money, which you exchange for butter to go with the bread. Or you put the money in the bank so that you can have something else later on, when you want it. In other words, your ownership entitles you to use your judgment as to what you will do with the product of your labor- consume it, give it away, sell it, save it.
Freedom of disposition is the substance of property tights.
Freedom of Disposition Interference with this freedom of disposition is, in the final analysis, interference with your right to life. What's more, if you find that this robbery persists, if you are regularly deprived of the fruits of your labor, you lose interest in laboring. Suppose the freedom of disposition is taken away from you entirely. Your interest in yourself also drops because you sense that without the right of property you are not much different from the other living things in the barn. It is silly, then, to prate of human tights being superior to property rights, because the tight of ownership is traceable to the tight to life, which is certainly inherent in the human being.