In fact, it's the only sexual activity that is 'safe'. During the war years, men spent days and weeks in the trenches, making proper cleanliness difficult which led to a higher rate of infection in non-circumcised men. Today, wars are not fought or won in the trenches and cleanliness is not a problem. Uncircumcised penises were believed to be unclean or dirty and were responsible for a higher rate of infection. Actually, it is rarely documented that the rate of infection in circumcised infants is much higher during the diaper stages when the healing glans is exposed to feces and urine.
Circumcision is normal.
Father is circumcised so the son must be circumcised. One that needs to be broken. Removal of a functioning part of a child's body violates human rights, goes against medical ethics and ultimately damages men.