Consequently, the HRC has to focus on such issues as alternative prison systems to avoid overcrowding and the appropriate way to investigate deaths in police custody. In recent years, it is true that there has been an increasing use of and reference to the international human rights conventions signed by Nepal in the judicial exercise of power. The enforcement of these rights will definitely be a matter for the courts while the government and Parliament will have the different, but equally important, responsibility of revising legislation where necessary. It is also necessary for the HRC to help examine the extent to which Nepalese law itself correctly reflects the obligations of the international covenants that Nepal has signed. In the same vein, it is also highly desirable for the HRC to ensure as far as possible that legislation which the government places before Parliament in the normal way is compatible with international human rights commitments made by Nepal and for Parliament to ensure that the human rights implications of legislation are subject to proper consideration before the legislation is enacted.
Human rights are an ideal standard.
To grade a student on the basis of their improvement over past performance is justifiable if the intention is to encourage someone discouraged about their ability. However, if they are rather pompous about their superiority in relation to other students, it would be best to judge them by an ideal standard. This strategy might spur them to improve at a faster pace. This needs to be borne in mind by all working for the institutionalisation of human rights in the country. Common sense becomes most uncommon in such a situation.