When you move into transfinite numbers so the distinctions become more defined to such a degree where ordinal transfinites are very different to cardinal transfinites.
Cardinality deals more with size and lacks the rigid ordering.
The neuroses would thus be more biased to expressions we can link to cardinality rather than ordinality. My favourite bit of Cantor is the definition of a set as a many that allows itself to be thought of as a one. I think a person is a many that allows itself to be thought of as a one. I am currently 'busy' on my own list as well as working. Currently wrestling with implications of Cantor's distinctions of ordinal and cardinal transfinites.