Teams also need to come to a common understanding of baseline expectations versus activities worthy of merit. The peer review process has implications for individual rights and confidentiality that need to be addressed. Individuals who apply for merit need to provide more specific details about their activities and accomplishments. Their packets need to make sense to those who may not be familiar with their work. Different teams have different standards for the same activity 2.
Criteria basically stresses learning, outcome, and impact on customers.
Individuals did not differentiate between their baseline activities and activities beyond baseline 3. Some only focused on one or two activities 4. Most review teams focused on editing rather than assessing and evaluating the progress and activities of the applicant 2. Real review process did not take place 3. Conflict of interest 4.