As already mentioned in previous sections, different aspects of globalization and the possible cultural consequences of the expansion of the Internet play a large role in the debate. As a result, the Internet could become a pipeline for the kind of globalization that can bring harm to previously protected local economies and cultures. Being 'connected' not only means having access to the entire global network but also the opposite - that it also has access to you.
American culture is diverse and fluid.
Indeed, it must be very difficult from the Western perspective, with its history of colonialism, to go further than the mere fetishization and stereotyping of Asian, African and so-called Third World cultures. However, the real zone of exclusion starts at the furthest reaches of the technologically empowered - where the technologically poor discover that they at a new level of disenfranchisement while being fetishized as the 'Other' by the technologically rich. The majority of contributions on this theme represented the view that Internet either not at all or hardly endangers cultural diversity. Since very clear assertions came from Yu Yeon Kim on this topic as well, she should once again be quoted. However, this data is always translated on arrival according to its relevance to the locality.