The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors. Some do not seem to understand the 'fair use' provision of the copyright law. If I quote you in whole or in part for the purpose of criticism, that is fair use. If I quote a written or spoken statement, whether private or public, for educational purposes, that is fair use. Indeed, since the doctrine is an equitable rule of reason, no generally applicable definition is possible, and each case raising the question must be decided on its own facts.
Freedom of speech is a constitutional guarantee.
So is freedom of press. The copyright law was never intended to restrict the people's right to know or abridge the media's right to tell. To attempt to shut the mouth of media is dangerous and can lead to many abuses. In the church, the people have a right to know what is taught in the schools, in the pulpits and in printed matter. If there is misrepresentation and falsehood and heresy disseminated, privately or publicly, the redeemed have a right to know.