See Schoepke v. On appeal, findings made by the district court will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the district court to judge the credibility of the witnesses. Minn. R. Civ. Appellants organize their objections into categories. Agency Determination Appellants argue that the evidence as a whole does not support the district court s determination that Arena Systems was a mere agent of Rink Systems.
Appellants misstate the record.
Arena Systems is a Minnesota corporation, with corporate offices in Albert Lea. These three individuals are also Arena Systems officers and shareholders. But finding two does not say that Arena Systems was not an independent legal entity. Arena Systems role under the agreement was to simply make sales and take orders, which were then to be sent to Rink Systems for further processing. The finding is supported.