Husband filed a motion for new trial or in the alternative, to amend judgment or hear additional evidence, claiming he was fired from his job due to company restructuring. Wife also filed a motion for new trial, or to amend or alter judgment. Husband and wife both appealed. Husband timely appealed. The three appeals were consolidated.
Husband raises numerous claims of error in nine points and sub-points on appeal.
Husband claims in his second point relied on that the trial court erred in failing to state whether the maintenance was a modifiable order. The trial court entering the judgment and decree of dissolution is required to indicate whether the order for maintenance is subject to future modification. Reversible error results when a judgment awarding maintenance does not designate the award as either modifiable or non-modifiable. Here the trial court failed to make such designation. In his ninth point, husband asserts the trial court erred in ordering a different physical custody arrangement than the one the parties had originally agreed to.