Programs have found a variety of ways to conduct joint needs assessments. Coordination between programs allows for substantial pooling of resources. Title I sites have made optimal use of existing care systems such as statewide case management programs. When funding streams are combined, it is necessary to clarify the allowable uses of funds from the various streams. Developing uniform State and local reporting systems for Title I and Title II providers allows for the creation of unified management information systems.
Coordination reduces duplication of provider contracts.
Title I and Title II programs have jointly developed service guidelines and provider training. Programs are trying to equalize access to services by adjusting the level of CARE Act funds allocated to EMAs and areas of the State outside the EMAs. Study findings demonstrate that having a single body to set priorities has clear advantages. It allows for comprehensive community planning without the need to make assumptions about what services other bodies might be planning for or funding. When the same administrative agency is in charge of grants, there is optimization in spending of funds from any particular stream.