That would be unduly accusatory. The mere suggestion that there are people employed in such places who shouldn't be there, who are unfit to be entrusted with the power of life and death over the powerless, would shift the focus of attention onto politically dangerous territory. It could be the first step toward opening a debate over the very essence of youth boot camps and the like, their stated purpose and purported efficacy. Tinker with peripherals, if you must, such as better training for current staff, but don't challenge the fundamentals. Surely no one can reasonably object to better training.
Every sensible employee welcomes additional training to help improve job skills.
And just think of the exciting new employment opportunities for those who will be the trainers. Hopefully, those who are unsuited to youth work will be weeded out, or will gracefully weed themselves out during the training process. This is wishful thinking. Employers are the sole arbiters of that standard. The financial balance sheets of these operations would change dramatically were they required to improve their criteria for hiring.