The true remains that no matter what overwhelming evidence there is to support any particular claim there will always be someone who sees things just a little bit differently. Most scientific findings are based on facts and theories that have been produced through assumptions of what we know. Little faith is needed to accept what is found as fact in the scientific community. These two states, fact and faith, are opposites that are prioritized differently in separate communities of thought. In the scientific community, as has been my experience, little faith is involved in the understanding of science.
Evidence is presented that clearly supports the claim being made in each particular instance.
In contrast, religion requires minimal evidence but a substantial amount of faith. There is little evidence to support many of the religious claims made, more faith is required to accept the claims made. This may be why there is such a lack of evidence to support the claim of the creation theory. Most people have such faith in God that little in any evidence is needed to fully accept the theories. I set out writing this paper hoping to find some far fetched evidence that could be construed as evidence in support of creation.