However we also have the right to express those beliefs. We may feel discomfort hearing opinions and beliefs expressed that are contrary to our own. We have freedom of religion under our constitution, not freedom from religion, just as we have freedom of the press, not freedom from the press. Neither are we, however, under any obligation to refrain from expressing our concerns in the public arena. The first amendment guarantees that congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof .
Free exercise includes freedom of expression.
It infers a candidate is disingenuously expressing a viewpoint not personally held in order to curry favor with a certain block of the voting population. This is a possibility of which we should be aware. We should also be aware, however, of another possible card playing strategy. Refusing to discuss religious beliefs can be a way of avoiding inflicting discomfort on a block of voters whose opinions on morality, ethics and law differ from one's own. In making an informed decision to support or oppose a candidate, it can help to know not only the issues and a particular candidate's stance, but also the basis of that candidate's opinions.