At first glance you might think so. In fact, it is difficult to give any sense to the idea of explaining a value judgment, for value judgments do not express facts of the sort that can be caused. To see this, compare each normative statement in the first list above with its corresponding non-normative statement in the second list. The entries in the second list are all capable of entering into causal relations. Something might cause the Olympics to be in Athens, something might cause my stomach to hurt, but nothing really causes these outcomes to be good or bad.
Forest fires are bad for the environment.
Statements like these may express vague recommendations, but their content is primarily empirical. The answer is no. Any statement we make about the world is the sort of thing that a person can come to accept or reject. The acceptance or rejection of this statement can be expressed in another statement that actually contains the first statement. Mr. Pheepher believes that red wine is good for the heart.