Respondent did not appear. The evidence is undisputed.
Complainant provides financial services in the international market.
These domain names are identical to and confusingly similar to the marks in which Complainant has prior and superior legitimate rights and interests. The undersigned certify that they have acted independently as a three judge panel and that they have no known conflicts of interest to serve as the Arbitrators in this proceeding. Respondent did not show a right or legitimate interest in respect to these domain names 3. Complainant met its burden of establishing that Respondent acted in bad faith. Respondent offered to sell the domain name to Complainant and ignored Complainant s cease and desist letter, and .