As we know that a mother treats a baby very differently according to her understanding of what its sex is, we need hardly be surprised that babies brought up as girls believe that they are girls whether they are or not and behave accordingly. In the past chromosomally male children who were classified at birth as male could not be re-registered as female even in cases where it had subsequently been decided to raise them as female. The case of Joella Holliday set an important precedent when it was decided in December 1998 that her birth registration should be changed and that she should be re-christened. From now on chromosomal sex is irrelevant. I wouldn't know how to be a man.
Euphemism is out.
Full-frontal honesty is in. AIS 'females' have no female organs and not a female cell in their bodies. We need to be sure that their being classified as female is not a reflection of a refusal on the part of entire males to recognize these damaged males as belonging to their sex. Cruel and unsympathetic though it may seem, women should not automatically accept all those who do not wish to be male as being ex gratia females. The same article told the story of an AIS baby who was correctly identified as male.