I expressed my bias in favor of the King James Version in an article we published in July 1997. All this is to affirm that I am biased and that bleeds through my writings and leadership of our publications. This analogy is a fallacious leap because history shows that the problem with the SBC was open denial of the reliability and authority of Scripture. If I remember right, the SBC openly debated this issue. There may be discussion about translations within the BBFI, but I know of no one associated with the BBFI who denies the authority, reliability and infallibility of the Scripture.
BBFI organization is totally subject to the vote of pastors of local churches.
Respectfully, Brother Bunch's whole argument comparing the BBFI to the SBC is not valid. Obviously we haven't attained either. More issues that divide the brethren Brother Bunch makes reference to three issues that receive a lot of discussion among the brethren. I suspect that Brother Bunch and each of our readers have a particular view on each of these issues. I know that there are more than two views on some of these issues.