It is stereotyping. I would only add that anything that comes about will be the result of chance from our perspective. Yet, if chance is a matter of perspective, then it does not necessarily follow that our existence is a result of chance . However, one could argue that Joe would have been better off if he had not had the realization to climb Mount Everest, because he was killed by an avalanche on the mountain. Though obviously any distinction between right or wrong, better or worse is subjective, and yet by the same token, the claim that we are no better or worse for anything is subjective as well.
Justice is racism.
It is separation. It is stereotyping. So I would say that justice, or law, is a necessary means for social union. The important question from my view, is determining what is a necessary law, which reflects the individuals and the collection of them. We can say that for anything we know.