Many times there are scientific claims without scientific evidence to support their claims. I often ask myself if it is really necessary to posses true scientific evidence of God s creation. I would speculate that many people would deem the find as a hoax. The true remains that no matter what overwhelming evidence there is to support any particular claim there will always be someone who sees things just a little bit differently. Most scientific findings are based on facts and theories that have been produced through assumptions of what we know.
Little faith is needed to accept what is found as fact in the scientific community.
These two states, fact and faith, are opposites that are prioritized differently in separate communities of thought. In the scientific community, as has been my experience, little faith is involved in the understanding of science. Evidence is presented that clearly supports the claim being made in each particular instance. In contrast, religion requires minimal evidence but a substantial amount of faith. There is little evidence to support many of the religious claims made, more faith is required to accept the claims made.