So for example the arguments of The Flat Earth Society , Creation Science , the Anthroposophy of Rudolph Steiner , and the canon of contemporary Science , are all paradigms in which they each describe the universe and the way it came about, by interpreting the facts intellectually and developing an explanation from that. Whether that explanation is correct or incorrect is irrelevant. The problem is, so many people think their paradigm is right and everyone else's is wrong. This is a terribly blinkered attitude. Reality Itself is beyond conception.
Every explanation is partial and incomplete.
Some explanations are more encompassing than others. But all are different ways of answering the so-called ultimate questions about the meaning of existence.