Violations may result in the evidence not being considered in the decision, adjustment of speaker points, or a loss of the round. Teams making context challenges should have the full text of the article in questions prior to making such allegations. If a debater is unclear I will give both verbal and non-verbal indications that I am having problems comprehending what is being said. An argument consists of three parts - claim, warrant. and implication. No style is excluded - tag team cx, sit down, stand on your head, aggressive, passive, whatever works for you.
Debate is for the participants - make the most of it.
Comparisons of arguments win rounds more often than the arguments themselves - compare evidence, weigh risks, weigh impacts, assess time frames, discuss the implications of uniqueness on turns and links, etc. The more of these things you do, the less your fate will lie in my hands.