All courts do.
But out of over 15,000 decisions by the Court, you have picked only a relative handful that make the Court 'look bad'. You have painted a distorted picture of the Court, and you have unfairly disparaged what is actually, though not without some minor flaws, a great institution. Sounds like a powerful argument. Anyone can reach a bad decision now and then. By placing these cases one after the other, and by omitting the many, many cases in which the Court has let individuals go free on one charge or another, it could be plausibly maintained that I have unfairly and unconscionably distorted reality.