Their contributors may be excused from not talking to one another, but when the editors lead us to believe in the Introduction that they have invited their vastly dispersed young friends to come together in a book to talk about lesbians, gay men and the politics of law, it would have been nice to have heard their hosts say something about the theoretical consequences of such diversity. American readers, for example, who are usually fed a strict diet of local law will find a fascinating array of resources and quotes from other common law lands. I would venture to say that even the American reader with an above average intestinal fortitude for local conservative statements hostile to gay and lesbian rights, might find some of the legal material from other common law jurisdictions a little hard to stomach. It has equally been regarded by society for many centuries as an offence against nature and a very serious crime. Male homosexual conduct has resulted, in other countries, in the spread of all forms of venereal disease and this has now become a significant public-health problem in England.
Homosexual conduct can be inimical to marriage and is per se harmful to it as an institution.
Not a bit. We emancipated races and got inverted racism. We emancipated homosexuals and they condemn heterosexism as chauvinist sexism, male oppression and so on. They will push us off the pavement if we give them a chance. The whole vocabulary of the loony Left is let loose in a wild confusion of Marxism, Trotskyism, anarchism and homosexual terminology.