A lot will be left out. There are many things physically observable that defy excluded-middle analysis, like much of the phenomenon found in quantum mechanics. I foresee a problem. My rant here is about where the boundaries of interaction of others are drawn. In my protracted experience with theoretical types, I find those boundaries tend to encroach upon common contexts of discourse, not just theoretical contexts.
Logic is a powerful tool for analysis.
My beef is with enforcing clinical defs on the creative thinking process. If one is engaging in an open forum and defines the context of discourse with specific definitions, fine. I'm simply saying I don't believe, know, or whatever word you wanna use, that sequential thinking will lead to any ground breaking understanding of mind and the universe. Near as I can tell, the methods I've seen here, are just more cleaver ways to search a space, not transcend that space.