These complaints, when successful, result in censorship. Christians should realize, however, that if any book is removed from the library because of its sexual content, then the bible should also be removed. I do object, though, to the bible's sexual ethics. There is no indication that God disapproved of Lot's behavior. Some of the material in the bible is filthy by any standard.
History is filled with violence and the bible is, at least in part, a history book.
And the bible contains hundreds of other cruel acts of God, any one of which, if true, would be enough for me to reject the bible and its vicious God. I do object, though, to the pointless violence in the bible, even when God doesn't seem to be directly involved. If God was trying to communicate something in this chapter, I think I'd rather not know what it was. I don't insist on a literal interpretation, but only that all of the bible be taken seriously and that none of it be ignored. This seems dishonest to me.