Various forms are available. Although no one is suggesting that the use of such a complete version of virtual reality is likely to be permitted by a court any time in the near future, it is likely that lawyers will eventually attempt to make use of some mix of the components. However, the evidentiary rules regarding the admissibility of virtual reality evidence are yet to be written, and the arguments in favor of it are already being formulated. The benefits The powerful impact of computer graphics and animation on juries is certain. 32 Lawyers will use technology-based visual demonstrations for the same reasons they have used models, photographs and foam board blowups.
Jurors respond almost uniformly in favor of computer-generated techniques in the courtroom.
Because jurors are exposed to computer animation in video games and on television, they are accustomed to receiving information through this medium. The proficient trial lawyer has always known that the average person's ability to assimilate new and complex information is limited. Accordingly, demonstrative evidence that invokes visual attention is an invaluable tool in helping the jury comprehend difficult concepts and complex facts. With the technological advancements available today, lawyers have the tools to clarify potentially confusing concepts and to liven up subject matter that has a high potential to bore jurors. 35 Words of caution Admissibility As indicated above, the rules as to the admissibility of computer-generated evidence are still being written.