The Back issues and Index are available here. It's updated constantly. Such a change would expose Americans randomly to more ionizing radiation than they are exposed to today. Government and industry both argue that this is acceptable.
Industry uses one justification, government uses another.
Many people in the nuclear industry argue that small increases in ionizing radiation aren't dangerous at all. They say the BRC program will not expose anyone to a dose of radiation greater than the threshold dose, and therefore the BRC program will cause no harm. Government approaches the matter differently. They have set limits for radiation exposure based on the moral premise that it is acceptable to kill one citizen out of every 100,000 citizens by exposing them to radiation. The most compelling evidence comes from studies of 91,231 people who survived the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan in 1945.