The left side of the anti-authoritarian space I have chosen to call decentralist. You can see how this works on Clipper chip and other privacy issues related to encryption. EFF chairs a coalition of 60 organizations, from the American Petroleum Institute to the ACLU, which opposes government control of encryption. You have cypherpunks and corporate interests aligned on this issue, because they all want decentralization of control over encryption technology. On the other hand, the sometimes fractious nature of the public interest community, of which EFF is part, can be seen to in splits along the same horizontal axis.
Infrastructure is a trickier issue than privacy.
However, there seems to be more willingness among many on the net who think of themselves as libertarians to leave it entirely to private industry to build the NII, where government abandons any role, even as referee. If we wound up with an NII controlled by an oligopoly of enormous corporate interests which resulted in centralized control over content, it would be a bad thing. If independent content providers can't easily get on the network, it would be a huge catastrophe. Personally, I think that's naive. Thus government should stay out of it, and the public interest community should go home.