Lot of good research, however, has been conducted and this should be taken as a starting point for growing trend towards quality evaluations. Some other branches of administration have similar or more mature undertakings. One model or method does not suffice for evaluation of subsidy programmes. A model, like econometric, captures only some of the effects and one method, like econometric modelling, has its limitations too. Thus, evaluator needs a portfolio of evaluation tools.
Evaluator picks the suitable ones.
Every report should contain clear statement on the tool selection. Reports should also contain descriptive information on the programme and its background as well as directions for policy. The process of evaluation and implementing the results must be further developed. The current organisational structure mixes administrative and supervisory power. The same organs that control the subsidy programmes make or order the mixed bunch of studies.