Each point of view has their own pros and cons. The minimal treatment approach is based on the fact that many asthmatics and doctors wish to avoid side-effects associated with drug therapy. Support for this position includes that asthma never used to be regarded as a fatal disease and that despite the introduction of new asthma treatments asthma death rates have not decreased. The aggressive therapy approach focuses on the fact that newer asthma medications enable sufferers to get on with their lives, and the risk of these side-effects are minimal compared to the benefit. Most doctors fall somewhere between these two points of view.
Doctors are often conservative of complementary or non-traditional treatment options.
Conservative means not abandoning traditional clinically proven treatments until something of greater clinical benefit comes along. Although some doctors, stick only to the traditional treatment plan, the majority will accept the complementary therapies provided the treatment will not harm the asthmatic and that you do not abandon their traditional treatment. Having a doctor whose attitudes are similar with your own view point facilitates good communication. All rights reserved. This information is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice.