We are thus proposing a form of 'Strong Foundationalism'. We must resist the classic lure of Complete Justificationism. It is there in our consciousness, but the overlay of familiar concepts makes it elusive. In terms of our theory, this is predictable, but nonetheless 'looks convenient'. Again, you have the phone.
Language thus tags along in parallel with the real action.
8.1 Sceptical doubts cannot seem to be answered. Induction remains a problem. The former is the kind of justification that solves the problem of induction - the kind we cannot give. We tend to try simultaneously to accept and deny Sceptical doubts - accept them intellectually, yet deny them intuitively. This has led to endless avoidable puzzles in our thinking.