Therefore, real philosophical communication goes from mind to mind, using language only as a very inadequate carrier of information. On the level of philosophical communication, language has lost its predominant significance, such as it usually possesses in our rational world. It is not possible to think without using language From what I said above, this thesis should be evidently recognized as begging the question. We often have ideas, anticipations, hunches, premonitions, intuitions etc. These are not single thoughts that correspond to equal single words in our language, but these are complex thought-structures that have no direct relationship to single words.
Language is a particularized structure, drawing heavily on our analytical way of thinking.
The corresponding manner of thinking is rational thinking . Higher and more complex forms of thinking are not analytic or particularizing, but synthetic and holistic . Therefore language would not be the right means of expression. Complex processes of thinking cannot be transformed equally into language as it is the case with discursive thinking. This thesis is only true if restricted to pure logical truth.