My job is easier, and you will probably be happier, if You tell me how to weigh these arguments rather than allowing me to decide. I will listen. I have voted negative a few times this year, on a variety of different violations. I am not particularly predisposed towards any one violation or against others.
Counterplans are a good strategical option for the negative.
Net Benefits is a valid and sufficient form of competitiveness. Taglines do not an argument make. Debates too often get muddled by the teams not having the same interpretation of the permutation. Plan-inclusive counterplans are debatable as well, although I think the burden of proving their legitimacy, and why they don't unfairly restrict affirmative ground, rests heavier on the negative. I have voted for them, probably more this year than any previous year.