All descriptions are objective. The sources shown have a very clear structural disposition. They can be 'intersubjectively controlled'. The approach thus can be considered scientific. We have managed to describe this 'irrational structure' in its interpretation of categorical relations and termed it 'categorical polarity'.
Categorical polarity is antithetical to the analytical sciences.
We now find the counterpart of a very long and ancient process of the development of this aesthetic sensation. The tremendous continuity of this cognitive system in many cultures questions the Eurocentric myth of the creator genius. Art thus is not merely a 'desinterested pleasure' in the sense of Kant and Schopenhauer. If we manage to understand that this anthropologically founded type of aesthetics provided not only the basis of human culture, but was also responsible for the tremendous manifold of human cultural expressions, then, it might be possible to use it again in a new age of cross-cultural art based on anthropology.