We can now proceed to consideration of second-order terms if you so desire. If you're going to distort my statements, I suppose that's an admission of weakness in your position. Corporations can be very beneficial, and can be an efficient means of economic organization, development, innovation, etc. This is shallow neo-liberal propaganda. The thinner stock ownership can be spread, the LESS control any stockholder has over corporate policy.
Investment funds dilute control even further.
Let's take a deeper look at history. Protectionism created the economies of Great Britain, the United States, and modern Japan. Cuba managed its resources so well that an illegal blockade by a super power has been necessary to bring it to its knees, to prevent it being a model for third-world development. I'm not sure what the point is here. As a national economy, Japan's protectionism seems to have worked very well.