Due to time constraints, I have not read every posting in detail. I hope readers will forgive me if I manage to state the obvious or ask something redundant. For context, I am a cognitive psychologist, not a philosopher.
Experience is thus earlier than-the structures in it.
In struggling to grasp these concepts and their elaboration in Muller's essay, I have three questions that I cannot answer, and for which I request clarification. That entity cannot be subjectivity, for subjectivity has been discounted as a derived mental structure. So that leaves E in a curious ontological state. Regardless of E's ontological status, it must have at least these two characteristics. Experience in-itself, whether structured or not, is hardly an intelligible concept without some experiencer.