That is, it must be possible to conceive some experiment, the failure of which would disprove the theory. It is on the basis of this criteria that most evolutionists insist that creationism be refused consideration as a possible explanation of origins. Creation has not been witnessed by human observers, it cannot be tested experimentally, and as a theory it is non-falsifiable. The same thing can be said about evolution. It cannot be tested experimentally, and as a theory it is non-falsifiable.
Evolution is simply a myth.
Sophisticated, and compatible with a mentality that deems itself too intelligent for God. It is presented as fact, but I see it more as a religion, a religion of the agnostic and the atheist. Though, I suppose that a person coud say that they believe in God, yet discount the Biblical acount of creation. In my opinion, all of this makes it a religion that requires a faith far greater than mine. I need also to point out that the issue of the absence of transitional forms in the fossil record is not a creationist accusation, but rather a widely known and accepted fact.