A critical sceptic should keep an open mind before dismissing paranormal phenomena a priori. One needs to be sceptical about supposed paranormal beliefs, but one also needs to be receptive to external forces that defy logic and science. Critical scepticism is where one keeps an open mind and tries to match the evidence to the belief. Selective sceptics are selective about what they are sceptical about. No amount of evidence can change their mind.
Dogmatic scepticism is for more stubborn people.
The Right to Life movement holds a dogmatically sceptical attitude to the abortion issue. One day paranormalists might be understood and not be thought of as deviants. I believe it all comes down to personal beliefs and experiences. It is amazing what I will believe if it makes me feel better. As the name suggests, 'global scepticism' derives from 'globe'.