Lists are either directly from another source or very vague. Site links have explanations explaining what one would find at these sites and why they are valuable. Student provides 3 links to other reputable bullying sites. Site links have brief explanations about what one would find at these sites and why they are valuable. Site has less than three sites, sites that aren't applicable, vague explanations or no explanations.
Graphics illustrate bullying problems and are appropriate enhancement for the web site.
Student has three graphics that illustrate bullying problems and are appropriate for the web site. Student has 0-2 graphics or graphics are inappropriate for web site. Student's web site contains all the components, is creatively put together in a way that makes sense and provides interest to the user. Student's web site contains all the components and is put together in a way that makes sense, although it is not as visually interesting as it could be. Student web site is missing components and is put together in a sloppy way that makes it hard to navigate.