Hyperlinks chosen do not reflect best evidence for group position or do not efficiently expose visitor to topic information Visitor feedback stated, but not analyzed or considered. 1 Group position statement demonstrates significant lack of consideration and attention to all points of view Electronic portfolios state individual perspectives, but lack substantive supporting evidence. Electronic portfolios lacking several listed requirements for mechanics and content. Hyperlinks absent or poorly chosen. Visitor exposure to topic material haphazard or absent.
Group fails to elicit required visitor feedback.
All sides can provide evidence to support their claims, yet the best evidence, that gathered over time, is yet to come. We, as a culture, have to decide if we are willing to wait a generation to evaluate the possible health and environmental effects that genetic alteration of food products may produce or should we do what we can to help those most in need by using the latest in agricultural technology.