Marcus stated it is up to the Board to determine if they have received all the information they need. Heintz stated the Town of Dryden has sent a letter regarding the SEQR process stating that they had no outstanding issues. Heintz stated the Village still has the authority to grant or withhold a permit for the project after SEQR is complete. SEQR is for environmental impact. Hickey stated Cross pointed out a road ROW change from 52 ft. to 60 ft. might change the impact on drainage or wetland.
Hickey feels the application is incomplete until that question is resolved.
Marcus has not seen a final statement from the Town of Dryden Superintendent or attorney with their requirements for the road s relocation. Curtis stated that if the project as being reviewed is approved as presented and something changes, then the changes can come back as an amendment to the Special Permit and another separate SEQR might be required and the project could not continue until the separate SEQR for the amendment was approved. Waterman asked Heintz if the Town of Dryden letter would provide the needed information. Heintz responded that the Town of Dryden has requested additional information which the engineers are working on so there will be a time delay before the letter is forthcoming. Heintz stated the changes to the site plan for the road are small when compared to the overall project and the impacts are negligible when looked at for the entire project.