After careful consideration of these criteria, this court must conclude that the order of the Campbell Circuit Court under review does not violate the Establishment Clause. Indeed, plaintiffs admit the program is beneficial. Thus, the first prong of the revised Lemon test is satisfied. Nor have the plaintiffs established that the primary effect of the program is to advance religion, or, indeed, that it advances religion at all. As pointed out above, this court may not presume that any indoctrination occurs merely because there is a possibility thereof.
Evidence is required.
Such evidence is entirely lacking in this case. The program as presented has no religious content, except to the extent that good mental health is religious. The monitoring and administrative cooperation required by the program are minimal at best, and even if they were somewhat greater would be insufficient to invalidate the program. The defendants' program probably survives the classical Lemon analysis and certainly survives the analysis mandated by Agostini. Bowen involved the provision of government grants to religious institutions for the funding of programs to discourage adolescent pregnancies.