However, collecting expert input regarding uncertainty especially temporal relationships often result in computationally infeasible models because of the complexity of these relationships. The shift called for in the report may be achieved, if we consider possible risk outcomes rather than probable risk outcomes . Possibility of a risk outcome depends upon a view that concerns what exist as a possible risk outcome regardless of its likely occurrence. Thus, our concern is with the different possible scenarios of risk outcomes, which may enable us to see what would the risk look like rather than just estimating its probable occurrence. The central idea is that risk is associated with human action, which is the result of human communication.
Humans exist physically in a binary form of being and non-being and so is their communication.
Therefore, any entity or information element may be subject to risk occurrence or may not be subject to risk occurrence. In the table, I have used NONE to indicate that the information element is not subject to risk concerns. RISK was used to indicate that the information element is subject to risk concerns. The above table of risk occurrences provides a possible set of scenarios of how risk concerns combinations may exist due to the different interrelationships between information elements. Information is not subject to risk unless it is used.