The correlation between the two breaks down in the twentieth century. The explanationist could respond that these cases still fit into an explanatory pattern. But here is a counter-argument. Anti-explanationists avoid any explanation, but they may have completely justified beliefs, such as, by observation, in the Pythagorean theorem. Hence an explanation must be comparatively good, and must cohere in a comparatively strong way.
Inconsistent systems turn out to be completely justified, if they have equal explanatory coherence.
This is a defect of idealistic coherence theories. Simplicity and Conservation Simplicity may supply the needed ingredient, as a tie-breaker. These play against one another. Claims of simplicity seem like special pleading. Further, there may be ties on the level of simplicity.