None of the other strategies clearly out performed the others, indicating that a hybrid strategy would be preferable. The testing of both the options and the strategies has indicated that a hybrid strategy would arrive at the most integrated solution. Below we summarise the mix of approaches that the appraisal indicates would be the most sustainable. This conclusion is based on our understanding of social, economic and environmental conditions in Lancashire. Local representatives will have a better understanding of local circumstances, and may conclude that this combination of approaches is neither the most sustainable nor feasible.
Housing Provide less housing than on current trends, with a mixed sub-regional approach.
The impact of housing development should be closely monitored and the approach revised as necessary. Aim for as much clearance and renewal of housing in East Lancashire as resources allow. Aim for a density of up to 50 dwellings per hectare where possible, as long as developments are of a high quality design that minimise noise and light disturbance, provide greenspace and reduce fear of crime. Existing planning permissions at well below this density rate should not be renewed. Only allow housing developments in rural villages for identified local needs, except in villages with good public transport links where additional housing could make a crucial difference to the provision or maintenance of local facilities.