Circumcision has to do with physics, not with morality, as circumcised Aztec priests demonstrated, cutting out living heart after living heart from their religious victims. Health issues are also of concern. Current research shows that uncircumcised males are ten times more likely to get urinary tract infections, are at risk of developing cancer of the penis, which occurs almost exclusively among uncircumcised males, and are at greater risk of contracting sexually transmitted diseases such as syphilis, genital warts, genital herpes and gonorrhea. Phimosis, where the opening of the prepuce is too small, and infections of the foreskin and glans are other problems faced by uncircumcised men. These problems disappear entirely with circumcision.
Film actors are good available examples of the effects of circumcision and non-circumcision.
The uncircumcised actors seem to be denied the fiery passion and spiritual thrust available to circumcised actors. They always seem to be reaching for something they cannot quite grasp, and they often exhibit a deep melancholy. It is interesting to note that much of the royalty of Europe has been circumcised in recent history, including the British and Russian royal families. When and why this began, I have been unable to find out as yet, but I suspect some metaphysical knowledge was initially made available to them regarding the additional powers bestowed by circumcision. Archetypally, the fire body, which circumcision opens us to, is the body related to kingly qualities, the power of love, and the source of enlightenment.