We should be giving them the chance to learn about us and our tactics, rather than rejecting these lawyers simply because their initial communications with us may be somewhat awkward. It helps to explain that none of the tactics we consense on require unanimity to work, and that people who need to cite out or take deals are truly supported. Explain that in political cases, co-defendants frequently want a deal which has equal impact on everyone. As long as each defendant is making an informed decision, the attorney should not have an ethical dilemma. Besides, the results achieved by using solidarity tactics often far exceed what can be done through motions and other legal maneuvers.
Lawyers think that anything is better than staying in jail.
We can explain about the drawbacks of fines and probation, and we can point out that when we do jailtime in groups, we have emotional and physical support which allows us to meet challenges with strength and good spirits. When we encounter attorneys who will not consult with us or respect our wishes, we should ask them to withdraw from representing us. They may be willing and able to help us switch lawyers. If they do not withdraw voluntarily, we fire them. The police or jail authorities frequently lie and say there isn't a lawyer there for us or that we must name a specific lawyer.