Comparative risk process worked at New Hampshire scale. After 30 years of successful federal and state environmental regulation, focused on industrial and other point sources, we are now in a new generation of environmental management. For more info, pls contact Katherine Hartnett, Exec Dir. Comparative risk process worked at NH scale. By separating fear from hazard, it is possible to more effectively prioritize actions Solutions that benefit multiple problems are preferable.
Design approaches that productively engage multiple constituencies, and show results. .
Everyone has a role. Designed credible, non-advocacy process. Explicitly evaluated hazards using science, judgment, and values. Focused on understanding and reducing hazard, with commitment to developing and implementing focused actions, using an integrated ranked list of risks to human health and ecological integrity as a guide. Used separate economic analysis to inform ranking and priorities for action.