Such claim that one s ethics is not to harm anybody else, is necessary de dicto, since its truth is not dependent upon which one in fact that is. However, this claim may lose its edge when one is asked whether such ethics is applied to a matter of specific subject or as an objective good cause in general. Strictly personal or purely business, or whether subjective or not, such a moral claim needs to gain flexibility and adaptability in any subject-matter in order to be necessarily true as a whole assertion of ethics. However, since the distinction between de re claims and de dicto claims in moral argument here is clear, moral values of each claim, or the values of good cause given by a moral act based upon either claim, can indicate a functioning of one s moral behavior. A function is viewed as an applicative rule referring to a coded process of going from argument to value, and can be viewed as a graphical presentation of particular values in a set of axioms.
Evaluation is to apply particular function to the argument in concern.
Literally, substituting the expression for the value and then performing further possible substitutions obtain the value of a function when applied to the argument, which takes particular expression. Posit another set of two axioms, of cause and effect, to evaluate subject-matter flexibility of a moral act based on a de dicto claim of moral belief. Since two scales for effects indicate, as a result, good causes given to an environment, including the agent of a moral act, both scales can be combined into one for the convenience of graphical expression. Possible cause level can be measured as a variable dependent upon the claim ability of de re or de dicto moral value. Truth values in a moral act can be found in a matrix of context versatility and subject-matter flexibility scales.