Further, we need to refine our discussion regarding IT support for instruction. Although there was much interest in the topic at ITB, our specific proposals did not seem to hit the target. We need to stimulate continued discussion, perhaps by presenting a taxonomy of alternatives. How to look at these topics in our distributed context is puzzling. One concern is that members of ITB typically have a higher level of IT expertise than instructors who appear at the labs needing assistance.
Grad students are able to fill only part of the gap.
The number of faculty members requesting Instructional Improvement grants with IT requirements suggests more staff support is required. Successful projects generate additional need for computer support in classrooms, putting a strain on staff in Instructional Resources as well. It was noted that the ITPG Context Document still has a good list of major items with estimated costs that remain operational. Consequently, it was decided to continue the discussion of how ITPG might help define instructional IT projects at our next meeting. The next three ITPG meetings will be held on October 26, November 30 and December 21, 2000.