Such accumulation does indeed give a ground for taking a chance on the generalisation being true but it does not guarantee that truth beyond doubt. Let us, in short, inquire whether induction is absolutely dependable. That is a lot of instances of the statement proving to be true. I am surely going to die sometime. No claim as to establishing absolute certainty by this process of induction can be entertained.
Induction is practically indispensable but, in absolute terms, fallacious.
So the fact that the person who judges with certainty that xyz is worthy of his absolute submission is, even if he has been proved right in many past judgments, not able to be absolutely sure that he is bound to be right every time. The notion of the rightness of absolute submission is therefore an arrogant one - one that quite falsely attributes infallibility either to perceived revelation or to the logic of induction. That is why other religionists are vaguely into Islamophobia while secularists are, quite explicitly, very anxious about the perceived re-invigoration of Islam that seems now to be happening. A virulent but, in its perverse way, authentic form of Islam bids fair to be the totalitarianism of the 21st century. Reasonable people, not least reasonable Muslims, should beware.