Likewise, the proofs of many others must be unsound. The challenge is to properly sift them, gleaning truth. The contemporary thinker generally associated with this marvelous proof is Stephen J. Gould of Harvard. Here locally, the alternate to the State Drafting Committee's proposed Science Standards was submitted by a Citizens Drafting Committee. This, of course, is not a definition of Creation but an argument for it.
Evolution lies exposed in the imperfections that record a history of descent.
An engineer, starting from scratch, could design better limbs in each case. Now many readers will chuckle at this, as I did. When I read it, I surmised that Gould was in a hurry to make a few dollars on another article, and we wouldn't see that nonsense again. But he has repeated it almost verbatim, and his disciples seem to like it. Before we critique it, we should acknowledge that his proof has been embellished considerably since 1981 by other authors.