In this context the proponent of an activity, rather than the public, should bear the burden of proof. The process of applying the Precautionary Principle must be open, informed and democratic and must include potentially affected parties. It must also involve an examination of a full range of alternatives, including no action. Reducing our use of chlorine-containing chemicals would be a second approach. There are few, if any, uses of chlorinated chemicals that are essential and irreplaceable.
Alternatives are available.
In that sense, the risk assessment approach is undemocratic and even anti-democratic. But when it comes time to deciding whether an incinerator is the best way to handle the community's garbage, people can get involved. Then people can discuss the pros and cons of what they have heard and can make up their own minds about what's best. Subscriptions are free. We would like to continue to provide this service free.