The first suggestion is that population will get extinct. But this is the wrong answer. In the two upper figures the model has a stable equilibrium, only the patterns of approaching the equilibrium are different. In the three lower figures there is no stable equilibrium. First 125 generations were discarded because the population may not have reached the asymptotic behavior.
Chaotic dynamics looks like stochastic noise, however the model is absolutely deterministic.
Chaotic models are widely used for random number generation in computers. Another kind of arguments is based on attempts to separate chaotic dynamics from stochastic noise. Time series of population dynamics are usually not long enough to separate chaotic dynamics from stochastic noise. I suspect that in these cases chaotic dynamics was induced by the seasonal cycle in population numbers. Chaos was never detected in time series with 1 year as a time step.