This analysis also should be part of the consideration of tribal rights with respect to the adoption of children with Native American heritage. In this regard, the Academy supports the court's position in the Bridget R. case discussed above. Children's existing or impending stable family lives should not be interrupted absent a clear demonstration of cultural, political and psychological ties that are entitled to constitutional protection. Therefore, the Academy supports procedural amendments to the Indian Child Welfare Act that would provide opportunities for courts to examine and weigh these competing interests during the adoption process. Finally, a child's liberty interest in family stability must be considered even when a failed adoption is meritoriously challenged, but results in protracted litigation.
Children are the innocent victims of such litigation and the grief that it inflicts.
Children are blameless. Juvenile Severance Action no.