Because we cannot sense God, we have not evidence of God. Without evidence, we cannot talk about God as being real with any sense. To form any theory that is not based upon evidence is to descend into nonsense. In an interesting move, Kim opens room for the possibility of God by using this logical empirical notion of science, itself. He blurs the boundaries between theory and observation.
All observations are laden with hidden assumptions theories.
These theories guide what we can see, and how we see them. If we can train our observations with appropriate theories, perhaps we can train ourselves to observe God. Though he does not argue for the existence of God, he does succeed in finding a loophole where talk of God in an Empirical way makes sense. This move is quite original and profound. Both Kim and this journal rely on the work of dead authors, people whose worlds have ended and moved on.