For some, genetically-altered seeds are the answer to solving world hunger by producing nutritious, higher yielding crops that can withstand even the most extreme environmental conditions. The debate on the merits of biotechnology in preventing long-term hunger and promoting nutrition in underway among farmers, international development workers, policymakers, and consumer advocates. In 1980, the US Supreme Court ruled that life forms that have been genetically modified may be patented. While these seeds are not yet commercialized for use, studies are currently being conducted and biotechnology giants such as Monsanto and AstraZeneca are pushing to begin global distribution of genetically modified seeds. Biotechnology s harshest critics contend that genetic engineering could result in a corporate monopolization of global agriculture.
Critics also protest that patenting of life forms is immoral.
Sabin said his organization steers away from terminator seeds because they destroy self-reliance in farmers. However, he maintains that biotechnology corporations are not the profit-hungry mongers critics make them out to be. The biotechnology people I ve met have been genuinely interested in solving problems rather than creating them. The potential agricultural and economic benefits of genetically modified seeds make them particularly attractive to farmers. According to the Alliance for Better Foods, the seeds may be modified to be more resistant to disease, boast more productive and nutritious varieties of crops, and survive under more harsh or extreme environmental conditions.