Researchers networking in this regard could be an answer. The path for sustainable future of our civilisation could go through the local agenda 21 processes work. Individuality of the local communities should be considered as main issue, when working on the particular local agenda 21 application. There is need for comparison of different cases, methods and experiences as ground for knowledge application. Socio-cultural aspects has as much importance as nature, space and environment aspects when working on application of local agenda 21 processes in local community.
Common man is the basic value of the local community.
Not anthropocentric and not biocentric philosophy have been considered as important, but knowledge and common rules in regard to the socio-cultural heritage and nature, space and environment protection principles application in local community are priorities. Before closing this report, I would like to emphasise that if anyone needs connection or anything about Local Agenda 21 Processes, do not hesitate to ask. Ecimovic, T. 1999. Kaunas after Kaunas Report. SEM Institute for Climate Change.