Judges are not appointed to represent anyone except the community of the State as a whole. If a Judge did act as a representative of a particular group in society he or she would be false to the judicial oath. That is why the Barrister who has the taxi-rank approach is best suited to judicial appointment, having no bias in who he or she represents. On the other hand, a barrister who specialises in say, environmental matters and avoids appearing for developers or for applicants, would not be suited for appointment to the Land Court. The Courts have to be made more accessible.
Costs too have to be looked at.
Attempts to abbreviate the process of litigation can also have adverse consequences that need to be monitored and rectified, eg. not having juries in civil cases is detrimental to the survival of common law as a representative of community values. No perjury by Police Officers. The strength of the Rule of Law does not lie only with lawyers, judges and the Police, but with citizens. There must be an attitude of legality. The true source of the Rule of Law is to be found in the patterns of behaviour and the belief of the people.