I liked what I saw for several reasons. I especially enjoyed your chronicling of your own personal journey re LW's work, seeing it at first as 'irrelevant and obscurantist' but coming to a new appreciation commensurate with the evolution of your own philosophical position. I see from your website that you edit an online journal and are maybe looking for submissions. It was a heady time for all, not just Fuller. In Synergetics, heighth, width and depth do not comprise building-block seperables, such that one or the other might be sensibly subtracted from the others.
Conceptual volume marks a primitive conceptual beginning.
I'm more a live and let live type, in the true liberal arts tradition. Synergetics has a reputation for being closer to 'Finnegans Wake' than any kind of principia of mathematical relevance, and in part that's because we don't have this social constructivist context or willingness to take an operational stance. But in Synergetics , a key word like 'gravity' also has subjective significance and defines a metaphysics with permission to reflect this, even while remaining faithful to Newton when visiting his neighborhood. We need to understand that Synergetics has a soul, is a work in the humanities, meaning metaphor and hyperlinks are a built in aspect of its primitives, because operationally a part of our form of life. Synergetics is a philosophy.