We have observed, first hand, stark differences in student achievement across socioeconomic groups and resource allocation disparities among schools with unique socioeconomic identities. Such differences indicate that someone out there is either against educational equity or insensitive to equity concerns. Yet, equity is high on the agendas of many stakeholders, some of whom are minorities. They are unhappy with the existing conditions and giving equity issues high visibility. Rather, we suggest that stakeholders start by identifying obvious disparities in student achievement, educational program participation by students, and the allocation of resources.
Caution is advised.
One man' inequity is another man's earned advantage. It is not uncommon for equity discussions to devolve into an emotional battle between the haves and the have-nots. An equity audit, performed by an impartial, outside consultant is a way to avoid such confrontations while gathering information and recommendations for action. Make the achievement and maintenance of a equity a key strategic thrust and support it with realistic action plans. Back up those plans with time, people, money, and action.