In October 1995, defendant was charged with committing a second degree sexual assault on his girlfriend. In February 1996, he pled guilty to intimidating a witness, a class four felony, based on events occurring after the alleged sexual assault. He sought an order from the trial court that the aggregate sentence of prison and mandatory parole would equal six years. The court denied his motions. The trial court also determined that defendant s motion was untimely because it was filed outside the three-year statutory period applicable to Crim.
Defendant now appeals from that order.
I. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in not granting his motion on the merits and in determining that it was time barred. While we conclude the trial court properly treated defendant s motion under Crim. Motions under Crim. Generally, an illegal sentence is one that is inconsistent with the terms specified by statutes. Although defendant s motion was not filed under Crim.