But, the point is to highlight the illogic of the arguments being used to support Bob's claim and the fact that you are using exactly the same tactics. If there was any chance that I was wrong, I'm sure you could point out the flaws in detail rather than having to rely on the standard blanket brush-offs and condemnations. Again, it will be interesting to hear your responses to what I have already offered up in this message. I further predict that you will continue to avoid presenting the positive support for your own views in favor of more blanket denials of what you misunderstand about science. No, that is not what I've done.
All scientific theories are subject to the same burden of proof.
However, since there is already so much evidence in support of these theories, it is reasonable to accept a scenario which does not violate any known facts and principles even if that scenario has not yet been conclusively proven. Furthermore, the moon being made of pixie dust does not violate any known principles. Yes, it would. That fact alone does not make the scenario of pixie-dust moons tenable. Now, one can see why you find theism so easy to believe.