False positives dramatically increase and detection effectiveness decreases. We really don't want to load bombs on airplanes faster, but that is what could happen if we overload the capabilities of the technology beyond effective limits. The device that finds the most bombs wins the race in detection preference. Profiling can help by reducing the demands placed on the equipment and the operator. Screening technology is changing rapidly, and the systems in place today are only previews of what will be available in the future.
CAPs can adjust rapidly and effectively to meet the demands and changes in the industry.
Possibly the most controversial subject resulting from the recent dynamic thrust at security improvements is positive domestic baggage match. This is a great idea and a very desirable goal for the industry to pursue as rapidly as possible. Baggage match is being employed on international flights and is an effective deterrent measure, but one that's not been implemented without considerable effort and a few flight delays. As the head of security for the Air Line Pilots Association, I have received a lot of criticism for not jumping on the bandwagon and demanding instant domestic passenger baggage resolution. Actually, I would be at the head of the line applauding the inception of domestic bag-match when it is effectively implemented.