Jeff Hochmuth agreed as long as the corridor is not trying to manage at too low of a level. Phil DeCabooter said the issue is not money, but getting what is needed done. Bill Brownell indicated that there is lower level information. This effort would establish what information is important at a regional level. Jeff Hochmuth noted that the component should be included in the Management Services Contract for maintenance of the GCM Architecture.
Architecture can continue to be developed as the corridor moves forward.
The corridor could be a mechanism that shows how things should be done regionally. Phil DeCabooter noted that the regional architecture has to identify the fuzzy boundaries at state lines. These issues would only be addressed at a very high level between counties within the state. He also noted that as projects develop and if they have some guidelines to follow, they are more likely to be interoperable and compatible. Phil DeCabooter discussed the Wisconsin statewide program.