There was discussion about the processes by which we evaluate chairs. This fall Roosevelt Newson went to departmental meetings to address the importance of this procedure. If more evaluations aren't returned, the dean could decide to toss out all that have been returned and to set up interviews with faculty members instead. Kim Pereira asked that a conscientious minority not be penalized for the lethargy of the rest. There was some agreement that satisfied faculty don't necessarily take the time to complete an evaluation form.
Confidentiality is an issue for others.
Arved Larsen stated that the committee needs to maintain oversight of this process, so that if there are administrative problems, the College Council can step in. Shari Zeck added that college has been a leader in encouraging all constituencies to participate in all levels of college activities. John Stark asked why the College Council doesn't consult with the DFSCs in gathering information for a chair's evaluation. Arved Larsen stated that there are several ways of viewing a chair's performance. Faculty can be happy, but the dean can see a different side.