This effort is politically at odds with the auto safety mainstream. The most important thing is immaturity. You can give teenagers all the skills and experience and they're still going to go out and do dumb things. A major effect of graduated licensing programs is simply to keep teenagers out of cars when they are at risk. This does not teach skills per se, yet might complement any skill improvement.
All previous studies regard standard driver education, with classroom lectures.
The prevailing belief is that if we teach better driving skills to teenagers, we will simply embolden thrill seekers. He notes a shift from two decades ago where the predominant motive was a father trying to share his recreational enthusiasm with a son. Schools like this involve a significant effort and expense today, and Steve was impressed. Jim Snelling, and Bill Scott, and others have designed their schools with the best curriculum they can devise. There are striking differences between various schools in purpose and structure.