Without loss of blood. In the last analysis everyone backs a winner. We feel recompensed in some way for the injury suffered throughout the whole of our lives. On the contrary, when such attempts fail the logic of judgment takes over. And could it not be that the same thing happens in the anarchist movement.
All anarchists are in favour of certain things, in theory.
So long as everything remains within the anonymous flux of life, we all agree that the bosses are theives, the judges assassins, and journalists liars, fabricators of images for spectacular representation. What matters is that everything proceed discreetly, without causing any fuss. When instead comrades feel they are confronted with the need to openly take sides, obliged to do so by a specific event, one that has failed to boot, the turgid waters of opinionism divide. Anyone who accepts the crystalization of parts of reality does so because that is the way they themselves live and perceive reality. And a foiled robbery here, a foiled robbery there, things begin to get heavy for those who work for the History of the movement.