What does that prove. The legal mind realizes that the fact that they lost their cases tells us nothing other than that they either failed to meet their burden of proof, failed to hire decent attorneys, or the judge woke up on the wrong side of the futon that day. It tells us nothing about the Audi 5000. In other words, the suit against the dealers was found to be frivolous. That doesn't mean the suit against Audi was, or that any court judgment in anyway diminished the validity of the plaintiff's claim that the cars are dangerous.
Content fails to explain.
Ultimately this story leaves one with more questions than answers. The big question, did the Audi 5000 have a problem with sudden acceleration is never answered. The next question, were there design flaws in the Audi 5000 that made it unsafe, is dealt with equivocally. Again, Content fails to explain. Ultimately the Content story fails for the same reasons so many articles in the popular press fail.