Evidentiary rulings are reviewed for an abuse of discretion. We find no abuse of discretion in the court's ruling that the records were irrelevant due to the lapse of time between the testing and defendant's request that the court review the records. Second, defendant argues that the court erred by admitting photographs of the injuries to the witness's genitals. Because no objection was made at trial, we review the court's ruling for obvious error affecting defendant's substantial rights. In this case, the photographs were relevant to several elements of the charges, including compulsion, restraint, and injury, and their probative value was not outweighed by any tendency to unfairly prejudice defendant.
Defendant demonstrates no error in the court's admission of the photos.
Third, defendant argues that the court erred by admitting evidence of his prior convictions for theft, escape, and possession of a firearm by a felon for the purpose of impeaching his testimony pursuant to M.R. Crim. We review to determine whether the court abused its discretion or applied an incorrect legal standard. Defendant's convictions were relevant to his credibility and the court did not abuse its discretion in determining that their probative value outweighed their prejudicial effect. Fourth, defendant contends that the court erred by admitting two items of evidence submitted by the prosecution, the whiskey bottle and bra found at the scene. Defendant argues that the chain of custody had not been adequately established for this evidence.