Usually negotiators are traditional leaders, and talks are carried on within traditional social institutes- gap, gashtak, etc. In these regions local government does not struggle with institutional structures of ethnic minorities but rather cooperates with them. This experience can be extended by media, seminars or trainings and discussed at higher levels of management. It can be used within governmental programs that consider ethnic minorities and can be considered as one of the examples of interethnic peace in political science courses in the academies of Tajikistan. This good practice can also be used to compare ethnographic and political research.
Conflict management depends on changes of identities.
This process is connected with the number of factors, including ethnic identification which influences the civic self-consciousness, political, economic and social behavior of citizens of the new independent states, in particular, their attitude to independence and their support of state construction in their countries and their participation in this process. This process may be observed by public survey. The public discloses opinions for content analysis and correlation with separate elements of self-identification, i.e., civic, ethnic, regional and religious identity, and of the priorities of the citizens in the new independent states of Central Asia. The Russian experience is of prolonged crisis of ethnocultural, social and civic identity. The Tajiks are in a complex and unresolved situation due to the formation of national state on the basis of an authentic search for a new self-identity.