Others believe that a campaign of public education is the only thing that would counteract the daily horoscope syndrome. For one thing, on a very broad scale, there are a few genuine astrological principles inherent in them - the basic characteristics of the 12 signs are easy to pick out and observe, even for people who would have a hard time understanding more complex concepts in astrology. Speaking of predictions, daily columns can be fun little snippets of wisdom but certainly not a valid means of prediction in the sense that astrology intends. Some skilled astrology writers are able to wriggle in some more fundamental concepts such as planetary transits, lunar cycles, retrogrades, etc. However, limited by sun signs, authors of columns still must generalize.
Columns are no replacement for a full natal chart or predictive analysis by a competent astrologer.
Then there is the attack on astrology by scientists. In 1975, the threat of astrology was becoming so great that 186 scientists thought it necessary to sign a pact against astrology. Carl Sagan was a notable exception as a popular astrophysicist who refused to participate because this attitude shuts off further inquiry. The gridlock between science and 'paranormal' events is not likely to change anytime soon. Although there have been a number of notable astrologers in early part of the 20 th Century, astrology as a profession continues to be a tricky issue as the number of practicing astrologers increases.