What confounds you about anarchism is not anarchism itself, nor it's advocates, but instead your incredible ignorance in regards to the subject at hand. It is your own hypocrisy that blinds you to what is truly occurring in Eugene, Oregon. I have argued above that anarchy is not a society without rules, but a society without rules. The problem with laws is that very few people are involved with their creation, so they must be imposed on those who had nothing to do with them. Furthermore, those who create the laws are free to bend, twist, and outright break them to serve their interests.
Anarchy is a society that replaces laws with social understandings.
There are no courts, no police, no lawyers, no soldiers, and nobody imposing their will on the masses. You would be hard-pressed to prove it. Even Thomas Jefferson himself admitted that a society based on commonly held social beliefs had stronger cohesion than a society based on law and order. The Native Americans. Of course, as I've stated before, you've already made your decision.