This is currently being debated in Religious Technology Center v H. Keith Henson . Call for Contributions Contributions to this web site are eagerly requested. Information, commentary, and criticism of any aspect of NOTs may be submitted to Dave Touretzky . The appearance of any essay on this site is not an endorsement of the views expressed therein. It reflects only my editorial judgement that the material is relevant to fostering scholarly discussion.
Anonymous contributions are welcome.
However, materials that clearly violate US copyright law will not be accepted. Potential contributors should note that since I am not a lawyer, I cannot advise them on what they should or should not say here. Readers in other jurisdictions may wish to consult local laws before downloading material from this site. My analysis of Mr. Milgrim's letter suggests that CoS has no case, and they know it. My reply to Mr. Milgrim points out that he did not allege any specific illegalities on the web page, and cites the decision of Judge Brinkema in RTC v. The Washington Post with respect to fair use quotation and trade secret issues.