Defendant's financial interest in settlement without litigation conflicted with the client's interest in getting a fair settlement. That relationship to the client distinguishes the service defendant offered from the work he did while employed by an insurance company. Defendant's business is distinguished from the service offered by, for instance, ombudsmen and union representatives by his profit motive and potential conflict of interest. The court does not concern itself with the results of the service. Unquestionably, the trial court did not err in finding defendant's consulting services involved the practice of law.
Defendant seeks to attribute any inadequacy in the record to the trial judge.
This claim is not properly preserved for appeal. There is no indication defendant requested a record that he did not get. Where, as in the instances defendant cites, the record reflects some confusion or misunderstanding, the record also reflects each instance was resolved to the relative satisfaction of counsel for both parties. There is no legal merit to this claim of error. An injunction is an equitable remedy governed by the principles of equity.