If the proposed reduction requires loss of faculty positions or the curtailment or discontinuation of academic programs, the committee and the Chancellor would then proceed with each affected unit, as well as with other appropriate groups and individuals, according to the criteria and process for program reduction in fiscal emergency. There is no easy or agreed upon way for weighing these factors, and no attempt to place them in any rigid order of priority has been made. However, each program can be assessed in terms of each factor and, even though it may not lead to a precise priority order for all programs, the unit or school should be able to identify those programs that rate very high in almost all categories and those that rate relatively low. This list of factors is obviously not exhaustive, and in particular cases, one or more additional elements may be considered. The Criteria 1.
Demand is obviously an important factor in evaluating programs and courses in the university.
The faculty must consider the number of students seeking admission to regular full-time undergraduate and graduate programs. Part-time students and outreach audiences must also be considered in assessing demand. The needs of employers for individuals trained in certain disciplines also constitute a form of demand. In addition, programs should contain courses that offer solutions to pressing economic and social problems and contribute to the quality of life. Particularly in academic programs and courses, it is difficult as a practical matter to build quality in a conscious and deliberate way.