Surely it can't be easy to put up with the irrational, closed- minded hatred day in and day out. I'm not sure I would have the strength. Let's first assume, for the sake of argument, that homosexuality is a choice. They might cite either a loose subjective translation or a strict literal translation, but both present problems. One, a model of morality based on a subjective translation of any text is subject to the preconceptions, however unjustified, of the translator.
Any text subjectively translated by a homophobe is bound to sound homophobic.
This is an obvious fact of human psychology. Two, a model of morality based on a strict, literal interpretation of a text is subject to the errors of the text. The Bible, for example, is absolute nonsense when taken literally. The text contradicts itself in numerous places and ignores historical fact in others. Now let's assume something different.