In addition, Microsoft has refused to share details of its operating system in a timely way. This makes it difficult for Microsoft's competitors to make programs that run on most computers. Part of the ruling also has to do with Microsoft's pursuit of the browser market. It's a tough world out there, says Microsoft, and it has had to fight hard to get where it is today. Microsoft also claims that the consumer has actually gained from its actions.
Computer users receive free Internet browsers and a cheaper computer.
Microsoft says they don't have a monopoly. As evidence they point to the growth of the Internet, and the popularity of rivals such as AOL and Netscape. After a long, drawn out trial, the judge ruled that Microsoft behaved in a monopolistic way. The 207-page document said consumers had been harmed and that Microsoft had used its power to punish competing firms. It stopped short of saying that Microsoft had broken the law.