After their discharge the ground nuts were inspected by a representative of the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries. The ground nuts were not in accordance with the contract nor were they of the weight and quality certified in the SGS certificate. Plaintiff covered in the spot market in Liverpool at X 635 per ton. D.In any event,.buyer should have mitigated in the Khartoum market. Assume that you can prove that there was no deterioration in the goods after March 14, 1989.
Arbitration is to be bypassed.
Assume no problems as to getting jurisdiction over defendants in the English courts. This question is not designed to trip you up on fine points of English law. Recall that neither England nor the Sudan are parties to the U.N. Convention on C6ntracts for the International Sale of Goods. Certain concepts are essential to a basic understanding of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. Additional concepts are critical to an understanding of the current round of GATT talks as they affect agriculture.