Finally, the most recent change allowed the bill to pass. We were able to satisfy the strong teacher lobby by giving the choice to the parents. If the different groups had not worked together and made significant compromises, the bill never would have passed in any form. As my state senator learned in 1992, it would have been impossible to accomplish our original goal of banning dissection altogether. This is the only way either group will find a solution.
Angry accusations are self-defeating.
Similarly, denying students access to information will only encourage further criticism. Professors must understand that an unwritten policy, despite good intentions, can be manipulated whereas a written one is solid. All parties involved must understand where the other side is coming from. Proponents of the choice policy want their views to be considered seriously. They must listen to each other with sincerity.