A value greater than 1.0 indicates an undercorrection. The CI is optimally 1.0. None of the above 5.According to the authors, the potential benefits of this type of statistical analysis include all the following except a. This method allows analysis of both regular and irregular astigmatism. This method allows analysis of astigmatism by both refractive and corneal measurements.
Analysis is displayed on a polar diagram, which is simpler and more clinically intuitive.
All the above are true. Analysis of aggregate surgically induced refractive change, prediction error, and intraocular astigmatism Jack T Holladay, MD, MSEE, John R Moran, PhD, MD, Guy M Kezirian, MD 7. According to the article, all the following are frequent sources of error in analyzing the results of refractive surgical procedures except a. Difficulty in correctly defining the axis of astigmatism b. Use of multiple lens systems in the phoropter c.