The automobile must provide more than the location of the injury. The fact the injury took place within an automobile does not transport the accident into the scope of the no-fault act. Alvarino v. Allstate Ins. Gabel's death, resulting from an aneurysm neither caused by, nor aggravated by the accident, is not within the statutory defined no-fault coverage. The Gabels offered no evidence showing the aneurysm was caused by any aspect of the use of the motor vehicle as a motor vehicle.
Accidents happen somewhere.
The mere fact an accident takes place within an automobile is not enough. IV Gabel argues the language of the insurance contract obligates State Farm to pay his attorney's fees and expenses. Gabels assert this provision applies to no-fault coverage, although it appears only in the liability portion of the contract. If the intent is apparent from the language of the policy, we do not look to construction. Cormier v. Nat.