She is urged to consider the ergonomics of Clash s space and how it might be redesigned for efficiency within the existing space or elsewhere. To stay on the cutting edge of the design industry, Clash needs access to technology and the ability to manipulate it. Therefore, at each building, Casbah inquires about technology capacity, the number of providers and the landlord s flexibility in working with tenants. Clash s ability to function would be greatly affected in a building with one provider of T1 lines and an inflexible landlord, rather than a building with 10 different fiber providers and a landlord willing to accommodate tenants needs. Casbah recognizes that Clash s future is closely linked to the technology capacity of the building she selects.
Casbah learns that moving costs are another significant economic factor.
Should she decide to move the firm, Clash will pay to physically move and change the firm s collateral material, as well as recreate or add to the existing technological infrastructure in the new space. Aesthetic considerations Image. Casbah wants to be certain that each building s image matches the image portrayed by her firm. If the building s image does not correspond with Clash s image, the building may be ruled out immediately. In order to justify a move, the new building must give Clash Design an opportunity to reinvent itself in exciting new ways.