They rightfully expect ACM to facilitate this goal through a smooth and timely process of review and production. In return, ACM expects that authors submit works that are ready for publication and that authors be responsive to reasonable requests during the publication process. Reviewing When an author makes a submission, a confidential review process is initiated. The aim of the review process is to make an appropriate and timely decision on whether a submission should be published. Such decisions are based on proper review by well-qualified and impartial reviewers.
Authors have the right to expect prompt, clear, and specific feedback.
To facilitate this process, a submission must follow publication requirements and authors must be attentive in responding to questions. Once a submission has been accepted, authors can expect ACM to publish the work in a timely and professional manner. Authors can expect to have approval of all changes to the work. In addition, ACM will not cause authors to perform unnecessary efforts because of the system ACM uses to produce the publication. However, authors do have a responsibility to work with ACM to complete the publication process.