As such, this court may examine the record to determine whether the evidence presented supports the conclusion. The facts in that case are distinguishable from those here. Employer denied benefits and thereafter referred the claimant for a medical examination. However, the employer did not discontinue the contest of the claim. This court reversed the WCJ's and Board's denial of attorney's fees, determining that the contest was not reasonable.
Disability is synonymous with loss of earning power.
Employer, in denying Claimant's petition relied on the fact that after being examined at the medical center the day after the incident, the doctor released Claimant to full duty. Thus, contrary to the facts in Yeagle , where there was a long period of uncontradicted proof that the claimant suffered a work-related injury resulting in disability, there was no such period in this case. Accordingly, as Employer presented sufficient evidence to establish a reasonable basis for the contest, the order of the Board is affirmed. Our review is limited to determining whether constitutional rights were violated, whether an error of law was committed or whether necessary findings are supported by substantial evidence.