This type of organization provides many fields that describe every aspect that makes sense. This is what a lot of the standards are doing. The nice thing about structured organization is you can ask very detailed questions, including the location that some document is describing, such as latitude and longitude, and request all the documents that are near it, intersect with it, or are within this country, and so on. The downside is that structured organization requires cooperation with standards. It is a downside in that it represents work and can impede the process.
Consensus is hard work.
We find that people want systems that can cope in the face of both structured and unstructured information, because you've got your legacy data and information. You're not going to go back and catalogue it. It's really hard and expensive to do this, but you've got new systems and software that are tagging the information correctly and are available. So again, a hybrid is what is needed. I want to return to a discussion of metadata.