The project team addressed this problem by articulating these presuppositions of eleven different camps of protagonists in lists of postulates and by identifying where possible which protagonists belonged to the different camps. As the maps grew in volume and complexity, the team recognized it needed to provide navigation tools that would enable readers to easily locate the 70 issue areas, to have landmarks for these regions and kinds of arguments. At least one of these is worthy of special note. An information design principle states that the visual form of the presentation should follow, if possible, the logical form. The team's design of dilemma boxes illustrates this principle.
All dilemmas shown on the maps have a similar structure.
This structure is made visual so that at a glance a reader can see the dilemma structure being used. In a similar fashion, circular arguments are, in so far as possible, represented in circular form. Study time is one. I read a whole stack of papers almost two feet high. The maps clearly provided context through allowing the structure of the entire argument to be seen at once.