It also insults the mentality of a growing number of people who are aware that extrapolations between rabbits and human beings cannot be made as the one bears no resemblance to the other. In addition, many people are aware that the current obsession to support the major cosmetic companies to search for 'alternatives' is trickery. It must be emphasised that it is impossible to extrapolate quantitatively from one species to any other species. At present, the only way to conduct these tests is by using animals. This is incorrect.
Customers are at risk.
Cancer Society medical director Peter Dady advised caution about the results of laboratory tests in which animals were subjected to doses of the product. For any who believe the lies of ARSL despite the massive evidence against the authenticity of animal tests a Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine , founded in 1984 in Washington, D.C. issued in 1988 a Declaration of Concern and Support , which demanded an end to animal-testing of consumer products on the grounds that such tests are neither scientific nor humane . I know of no case in which an ophthalmologist found Draize data useful. The results of these tests are of no use to physicians. The data produced by these tests don't keep harmful products from being sold.