This conclusion is allegedly reached if sufficient features match in the comparison list. As we will see later, comparative anatomy and physiology are not so precise as to give definitive, narrow answers to the question of what is the natural diet of humanity. Instead, comparative anatomy and physiology provide evidence of associations and possibilities. It should be emphasized, and very clear to readers, that comparative anatomy and comparative physiology are legitimate, useful, and important tools for scientific inquiry and research. This paper will look at some of the limitations of such comparative analyses.
Comparative anatomy is a valid tool, but simplistic applications are often fallacious.
Emphasis on Primates Modern human beings, species Homo sapiens, are classified as belonging to the primates. Accordingly, as this paper focuses on comparisons, the non- human primates will often be used for comparison. When necessary, non- primate species are discussed as well, but most attention here is on primates. They provide what I hope you will find to be interesting insights into the strange crank- science claims and phony naturalistic philosophy that, unfortunately, are often a part of the basis for vegan fruitarianism. Also, as fruitarian extremists will be mentioned here, please note that some fruitarians are moderates and are not extremists.