By this time, however, amputation of the leg was necessary. At first glance, this might appear to be an extreme or isolated case of malpractice. But my experience as a chiropractor and as an independent consultant in malpractice cases has convinced me it is not. The chiropractor was merely following what he had learned in school. It should be obvious that anyone wishing to treat a disease would first have to accurately diagnose what needs treatment.
Antagonism exists between the two groups.
Chiropractic will assume its rightful role in society when those who claim to be chiropractors stop wandering all over the medical therapeutic world and use their full potential in further developing the art and science of locating and correcting subluxations. Only to return to the sanctuary of their offices to utilize blood tests,nutrition, physiotherapy, vitamins, and yes, even diagnose. . . As far as the obligation to diagnose is concerned, the courts clearly side with the mixers. In my opinion, the answer is no. Dr. Sportelli is probably correct that some straight practitioners are trying to diagnose, but it is also clear that most mixers believe that spinal problems are the basic cause of disease.