I've always felt that I've never really known a person that was a together, successful person. And most theater tries to give you a feeling that you are being presented with a whole organized representation of the world as we interpret the notion of what the world is. It's a lot of bits and pieces stitched together from different sources. And to give the feeling of a character, for instance, which I've always hated in the theater, is a lie. Character, like Jacob said, character is an error.
Character is contingent accent.
And I've always been interested in the scenes, in the ways things are glued together and fail to present anything whole or coherent. Now nevertheless, the music that can be made out of that swirling of all of those incoherent pieces, the poetry that can be made of that, in a way, can be a different kind of lucidity. I think I'm only interested in art in lucidity. But I'm interested in the lucidity of, I guess what Lacan would call the real, which are all the things that made you stumble, the things you can't touch. That's what interests me in art.