The organizational structure of the IPM Project was not typical of most University of California efforts of that time, which were strongly disciplinary-based and administered within rigid administrative units. Rather, our structure evolved to foster cooperation and teamwork, provide flexibility for identifying and responding to priority issues, bridge traditional campus research and county Extension boundaries, blur distinctions between academics with different types of positions, and establish networks with individuals and organizations outside of the University to provide relevant, science-based pest management information. The current DANR planning effort has been underway since April 1995, and has involved dozens of DANR academics and over 150 external constituents. Programs are adaptable, flexible, and responsive to high priorities. There is a very strong local or county connection for delivery of DANR programs.
Administration is efficient and responsive to programs.
There is a continuum between research and extension. There is public understanding and support for DANR programs. What is striking about these criteria is how closely they fit the structure and programmatic activities that have evolved for the IPM Project. Cooperation and collaboration between UC scientists and the IPM Project has been essential for the success of most IPM Project activities such as the production of IPM manuals, Pest Management Guidelines and Pest Notes . The IPM Project can help facilitate the production of such materials, but the information must ultimately come from other experts.