P.S. Docket No. Sandra C. McFeeley, Esq. Basil J. Mezines, Esq. Jacob A. Stein, Esq. Helen Randolph, Esq.
Complainant opposes the motions.
For the reasons set forth below, Respondents' motions are denied. Respondents first argue that False Representation Order No. 87-36 is unnecessarily broad. In this regard they contend that Respondents Francis Margulies and Fulfillment Center, Inc. should be excluded from the coverage of the Order and that the Order should be limited to apply only to the particular medals involved in this proceeding. Respondents also argue that the Cease and Desist Order issued with the Decision is impermissibly broad and ambiguous and should be modified. Respondents' argument pertaining to the exclusion of Francis Margulies and Fulfillment Center, Inc. from the Order is by their own admission a reiteration of an argument previously made in their Brief On Appeal.