State of Utah v. Luttmer, Case No. Robert Thomas Luttmer, Defendant and Appellant. Before Judges Greenwood, Jackson, and Billings.
Defendant claims the evidence presented to the jury was insufficient to support the guilty verdicts.
We affirm both verdicts. Defendant first argues that American Fork failed to show that Defendant possessed and intended to use paraphernalia officers discovered in Defendant's work truck. Utah courts have interpreted this statute to encompass constructive as well as actual possession. Although the record contains conflicting testimony, when reviewing a conviction we consider the facts in a light most favorable to the verdict. Thus we rely on the version of the facts which support the verdict.