Kasparov, on the other hand, is not limited in this manner. To illustrate the point, consider the following thought experiment. Suppose Kasparov collaborates with the programmers at IBM to give Deep Blue all of his experience and decision-making calculus. What would permit him to prevail is his ability to generate new methods of analysis. The answer remains to be seen.
Chess is probably too limited a means to simulate intelligence.
Eventually, when computers can win consistently because of sheer brute computational force, we can rest assured that it is not a display of intelligence but rather a triumph of the human ability to make tools for his own use. Often it is enough to remember past things and match them with what's needed. When you drive to work, it's routine again. Somehow the raw computing power of Deep Blue attracts much more attention than its sophisticated programming. It goes without saying that a dumb algorithm will not be able to rival a grand master even on a very fast computer.