I think it is. Campaigns nowadays, presidential campaigns, are kind of hazing exercises where we raise obstacles. The press raises questions, sort of an obstacle course, to test a candidate's past, his history, and tests his ability to deal with these kinds of questions. It's legitimate to ask candidates whether or not they've committed crimes in the past. And this is something that's come up in the past over marijuana.
Cocaine is obviously relevant.
And frankly George W. Bush should know that this kind of thing is coming. It's going to hit all the candidates. The way I was brought up in this business, you should never ask a question without some factual basis for it because if you do, you are doing the moral equivalent of floating a rumor, which I was also taught a long time ago one should never do. I think the terrible thing that's happened to our business is that we have figured out ways to do this routinely today to the everlasting damage of our credibility and effectiveness. So in other words, to get rumors in play.