For example, psychosis is unfamiliar to most people, so in an insanity defense case, jurors typically re the familiar experience of being sane, discounting the feasibility of insanity. When complex DNA evidence is introduced in a trial where race is an issue, jurors may fin own experience of discrimination based on the factor of skin color to be the most salient point which to make their judgments. The most promising forms are those that would involve the jurors as active responsible participants. One suggestion is to allow juries ask questions of the trial witnesses. In medicine, the patient's participation in a dialogue with the physician has been recognized as a valuable of the decision-making process.
Dialogue is also the of group psychotherapy.
A successful medical mode could translate to the courtroom is the group therapy grams that are used in treating those addicted to self limiting or self-destructive lifestyles. These individual largely resistant to preaching about the evils of, say, alcohol, but they do benefit from an interactive approach confronts their own preconceptions. As an example, individuals who have been drinking heavily for years often have atrophied problem-solving skills. In the group therapy session, the group leader elicits each individual's prejudices without endorsing them. In time, the group members take over more of the work from the leader and build a fund of shared experience that becomes familiar, so that they can draw on it for alternatives to their former beliefs and habits.