Defendant argues the admission of this testimony was reversible error. Reversible error is only found when the irrelevant evidence is of such a nature that it would mislead the jury or prejudice the opponent. The subsequent deposition identifies the conditions Brian had developed between dates of the depositions, and the treatments that were no longer necessary. Admission of Dr. Eglinton's depositions into evidence were neithermisleading, nor prejudicial. This assignment of error is overruled.
Defendant contends that the verdict was contrary to the greater weight of the competent evidence.
128 N.C. App. 98 N.C. App. We have ruled that the conversation between Mr. Gellert and Ms. Howard and the depositions of Dr. Eglinton were properly admitted into evidence, and hold that sufficient evidence exists to support the jury's verdict. Defendant's motion for a Judgement Notwithstanding the Verdict was properly denied. Also, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion for a New Trial.