So it's not a stagnant situation that we accept things as they are, but should be reviewed. The other thing is that, as the Secretary said, he knows that there is unhappiness and knows what is taking place in Iraq. What we need is to give the full chance for the talks that are going to resume or start after tomorrow in New York between the Government and the Secretary General of the United Nations about the whole question of Iraq and the Security Council resolutions, and the Secretary General is going to listen to what the Iraqis have to say, concerning sanctions, concerning the situation after ten years, etc. So there are certain stations that are coming up and we will see what we can do. You said earlier that there is no moral equivalence between the Palestinian self-defense and the Israeli attacks.
All human life is precious.
What we all have to be doing now is encouraging both sides at every level to reduce the level of violence, to begin speaking to one another again, to begin restoring economic activities so that people can put food on the table, to begin restructuring the security arrangements that were lost. This is the time for all of us, not to point fingers at one another, but doing everything we can to reduce the level of violence, because if the level of violence remains high, then we have trouble getting the negotiations going again. While answering your question, first of all you have heard what Secretary Powell had to say about sanctions, that he is re-thinking our thinking of a new type of sanctions not the same. Well, sanctions so far have affected the people rather than any regime. Sanctions should be reconsidered as a weapon or as one of the procedures the Security Council resorts to.