Book reviews tend to be predictable.
A newspaper, a magazine or a journal has an agenda, sometimes more obvious for some than for others. Part of the enjoyment of reading a review is to see if it is possible to guess beforehand what its tone is, given the reviewer and the particular publication in which the review appears. Though the Journal of Scientific Exploration specifically eschews any pre-determined position, nevertheless it also takes a fairly predictable stance regarding phenomena and the people who write about phenomena. So it wouldn't surprise me if among the readership of the Journal of Scientific Exploration, I may be the only one to enjoy Nicholas Humphrey's Leaps of Faith. This is an entirely normal prediction on my part and unrelated to clairvoyance of any form.