De novo review. Award is incomplete, ambiguous, or contradictory so as to make implementation impossible. Arbitrator was biased or guilty of misconduct that prejudiced the rights of a party or the award was obtained by fraud or undue means. Award is contrary to public policy. Arbitrator denied a fair hearing.
Award is based on a nonfact.
A central fact underlying the award is clearly erroneous, but for which the arbitrator would have reached a different conclusion. Award failed to draw its essence from the parties' collective bargaining agreement. Arbitrator exceeded his or her authority. The Authority will not consider evidence or issues that could have been, but were not, presented to the arbitrator. B. Compliance with a final arbitration award is required, and failure to comply constitutes an unfair labor practice.