The obvious answer to each question posed thus far is a system of loosely regulated capitalism. The state's power must be diminished, for the anarchists are right to claim that its coercive power is harmful to society, if only for its adverse economic effects. However, the concept of property, which the collectivist anarchist villifies so thoroughly, is the one item which is the saving grace of the system. The profit motive will be unleashed in its full fury, forcing people to work for everything they receive, and ensuring that those whose work is most effective are most rewarded. The natural effect of competition, in an economy unrestricted by governement interference, will further help the average worker.
Anarchists fear the exploitation of man by man.
Surely capitalists know this all too well. The company which treats its employees poorly stands to lose an edge in the marketplace as they migrate to other firms. If the rights of all are equally protected, Adam Smith's invisible hand will do the rest, and do it well. He has no place in a capitalist society. More likely, however, he will come to the realisation that he must work to survive.