The ethical issues rankle especially in relation to China, which has a fifth of the world's people. Progressives should also be insisting that the United States take seriously its leadership on human rights and environment. U.S. selectivity in protesting human rights violations has dogged U.S. credibility and effectiveness for a couple of decades. In case after case, in its relations with particular countries and in its diplomacy in international organizations, U.S. diplomats have ignored, tempered, or even countered commitments to human rights and the environment when U.S. commercial or strategic interests are at stake. A unilateralist approach to foreign policy relegates the U.S. to the role of the playground bully.
Bullies get what they want in the short term, but typically get their due in the end by angry gangs.
Better to be a good leader. Leadership in multilateralism requires the U.S. to build coalitions, listen to and respect people from other countries, especially developing countries, as well as U.S. NGOs and labor groups. It means skillfully striving to establish global consensus on environmental and human rights norms, rather than grabbing the flag and running towards home, hoping that everyone will follow, or worse, boxing people around the ears. Most important, a commitment to a robust and progressive multilateralism entails defining the goals of global governance as central to U.S. foreign policy. And it is such a member, whether or not Americans understand or approve of it.