The purpose of the review is not to assign a specific grade, as this is the responsibility of the instructor. Rather the purpose is to provide a general overview of the student's work. If the reviewer determines that there is a drastic difference between the apparent quality of the work and the assigned grade, the reviewer shall discuss the matter with the department chair who will take further action if needed. At the completion of the semester, the instructors shall meet with their department chairs to discuss any problems that may have arisen including any concerns raised by the reviewer. The outcome of the meeting shall be documented in writing.
Disruptive behavior is subject to disciplinary action.
As a part of their regularly assigned duties, qualified faculty are asked to advise students. The number of students per advisor is variable, depending on the number of qualified faculty available and the number of students to be served. An attempt should be made to keep the number of students per advisor small enough to allow for personal interaction. The principal reason for the system is to have a readily identifiable individual to whom the student may turn for understanding and advice about academic and vocational matters. Those who are able to promote frequent consultations will find such individual faculty-student relationships rewarding.