Chance is a non-entity. Take for example, a coin toss. Arguing for chance as a cause is arguing against logic. Random variation or chance is a non-being. Now I am confused.
All words are to some extent subjective.
I am not talking about have volition. I am simply asking how chance, as a nonentity, can exert influence. Energy is categorically different from chance. I hope you are not suggesting that they are of the same type. I believe our disgreements appear to be caused by definitions of words.