Given academic feminists' cannibalistic tastes, one might think they would swoon in ecstasy every time the movement opened another can of worms. Whenever some faction raises a new issue, they object. You don't have enough evidence to support that. Take a course in methodology, see what Toynbee has to say. Synthesize Rousseau's, Freud's, Woolf's, and Benedict's comments on gender.
Any woman can.
Rather than uphold movement assumptions and explore the frontiers of its issues, they move in only when it has secured an area, and tidy things up beyond recognition. Academics maintain that their tardiness and fastidiousness help movement theory. They claim to replace it's subjective political bias with objectivity and facts. What academics do, without saying so, is change the politics of the issue. And the results conform more closely to status quo politics.