Other times, it's difficult not to be a little defensive or exasperated by the questions though we'd like to believe most of the questions aren't intended to be offensive. The questions do indicate, however, that at least some people harbor certain misconceptions and misunderstandings about Kindness Inc. or about shelters in general. Perhaps the following may help clarify those questions or enlighten readers who never had reason to give the subjects much thought. Where a shelter houses its animals has nothing to do with its euthanasia policy. Any organization that uses the word humane in its name is a no-kill shelter.
Different organizations define humane differently.
Some feel that it is humane to kill animals as a means of population control or to avoid spending money or time on medical care or behavioral work. While it does specifically prohibit certain actions, the law does not define the term humane . . No and this question puzzles us. We know of no shelters that are officially affiliated with shelters of another name. Judgments aside, as a no-kill, Kindness Inc. could not reasonably be expected to be affiliated with a kill shelter, as is the case with Anderson.