The whole purpose, John, in my presenting what I did was to provoke a discussion on the epistemological ramifications of cosmology. But the assumptions of direct realists and atheists assume also. The discussion is at an impasse. I'd like to know. Therefore, you can't reason from them.
Conclusion is specious.
Intro to Logic. You can no more prove that than I can disprove it. Your second premise implies that the universe is merely physical. Common sense tells us that. Neither are facts.