Yes, so long as the selection process encourages referrals to qualified programs that advance the county's objective of reducing family violence. Canon 2B admonishes the judge not to influence the selection process to advance the private interests of any provider. This would be a violation of Canon 2B, where A judge shall not testify voluntarily as a character witness. The CASA program consists of community citizens trained and appointed by district judges to serve as volunteers to advocate for the best interests of children who are involved in the court system due to abuse, neglect or abandonment, and to aid in reducing the time spent by these children in foster care. Inc. Annual Report - FY96, there are currently 44 CASA programs covering 85 counties in Texas, serving approximately 6,537 children.
CASA volunteers serve without compensation.
Yes, to both parts of the question. This judge feels the need to defend his reputation now against these false accusations even though the matter is still pending because of fears the litigation may not be concluded during his lifetime . A senior judge who has consented to accept judicial assignment is required to comply with the Code of Judicial Conduct. This canon bars public commentary by the judge except for judicial statements explaining the procedures of the court. To engage in an editorial debate with his critics about the merits or motivations of his decision not to recuse himself or his ability to be impartial would place the judge in the position of taking sides outside the courtroom for or against parties urging certain positions inside the courtroom.