Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge Edwards . Accordingly, appellant's motion for reconsideration of this court's order dispensing with oral argument is denied. The Company was also found to have violated the Act in firing employees who violated the rules, and then in denying reinstatement to employees who refused to adhere to unlawful conditions imposed by management. Accordingly, the petition for review and cross-petition for enforcement each are granted in part and denied in part. Two of the provisions in that manual are at issue in this petition.
All grievances are to be discussed in private with the office manager or physicians.
It is totally unacceptable for an employee to discuss any grievances within earshot of patients. Id. at 21, reprinted in App. The day before, Dr. Young had changed the work schedules of an ophthalmic technician and three registered nurses in order to accommodate an emergency surgical procedure. Under the revised schedule, the locations to which the employees were to report on May 29 were altered, and two of the employees were required to work from 8 a.m. until 2 p.m. without a lunch break. Dr. Young met with the four employees on the morning of May 29.