From this I draw two deductions. The first is that convoluted scholastic prose has a long pedigree as a subject for satire. The second is that there is something about it that truly frightens people. The contest solicits entries of unforced ghastliness from academic journals or books. And that, as they say, was for openers.
Deconstruction meets the vision thing.
But I digress. But you get the point. Noam Chomsky has said that he must be lacking some essential gene that prevents him from understanding Foucault and the rest. Russell Jacoby, one of the radical-left critics of academe, made similar points against Fredric Jameson years ago. Look again at the last two quotations above.