This is based on Marr's ideas, as expressed in his book Vision , though in somewhat distorted way. As a result, I wrote a Critique of Vision by Marr , which, if you find Marr's ideas useful, is guaranteed to raise your blood pressure. An important question is why do the nonsense arguments which are based on these reasoning errors, myths and misconcepts are effective in convincing people. The Irrefutability of nonsense-arguments and the Blatant nonsense effect go some way to explain it. Probably a larger factor is the fundamental methodological errors in the way cognitive scientists approach the question of coginition.
Computer models form large portion of cognitive models.
In Computer models of cognition I argue that these models are not as useful as they are supposed to be. I wrote this text because some people say they want to see comparison between the performance for my model and other computer models. Some more extended comments are here . Chomsky worth a special mention. Evolutionary Psychology is as bad as Psycholinguistics by now.