Amendments are likely. P art of the challenge is creating clear rules in the midst of extraordinary changes in e-commerce technology and business practices. It applies new rules only where change is necessary to facilitate electronic commerce, the group says. Courts have recognized that digital information deserves protection just like traditional newspapers and magazines. Emphasizes the licensing rather than the outright sale of information, allowing a vendor to wield more control over its use.
Consumers see only after they buy a software product at a store or online with the click of a mouse.
Places undue constraints on the use of information for public purposes such as political speech, education and scientific research. Is too broad in scope, covering everything from artistic expression such as poetry and web pages to traditional intellectual property such as patents, trade secrets and interactive games. Fails to adequately hold vendors liable for defective products by requiring consumers to bring legal claims in the jurisdiction of the software company's choosing. Isn't necessary since common and copyright law are developing fast enough to handle concerns. The parties want to know what law applies.