This is a preliminary report has been submitted for adoption by WG-Review. That said, we believe the poll result is fairly representative of the people speaking up in this discussion, and probably a fair reflection of the feelings of a lot of people who have touched or participated in this process. The core problem for many members of this WG is the issue of constituencies and representation. Substantial discussion has occurred on the topic of appropriate models for both group cohesion and selection of Names Council positions.
Current results are unclear.
This seems to indicate that the question needs a good bit more consideration, but based on this result it would tentatively appear that no consensus exists within this WG for the continuance of the current constituency structure. Indeed, a substantial majority of the responding WG members seem to favor some form of change. Clearly the definition of the GA and it's tasks needs to be seriously addressed. Time has been scheduled for this discussion. Though this would appear to be a consensus, the question was not cast in consensus form and is being reported as an 11-0 majority.