The original motion was made and seconded by Curriculum Committee members. He said Gremmels could suggest that someone on the CC propose an amendment. Gremmels asked that a CC member propose an amendment that wellness be pulled and considered in II.B. Arguments have already been made. Doing so would make other considerations possible. One conception in the GEC was to give more flexibility to students.
Courses have to survive on their own merits.
Gremmels said we wouldn't have to add another course to the requirement, but could add a course to the science requirement instead. Klinger urged CC members not to approve this amendment. Farrell was concerned that this is a CC motion, but it is GEC members who are speaking. He thought it was appropriate for GEC members to comment, but he was concerned about the pressure being applied. Gremmels thought it made sense to simply eliminate Wellness and let those courses fall into any category that seemed appropriate.