Indeed, sampling gives the genre its artistic vitality in its tendency to comment upon our society through a post-modem patchwork message. Attempting to stifle this message by sanctioning samplers through litigation using existing copyright law is undesirable. The needs of both samplers and the artists that they sample can be satisfied through the use of a voluntary, transactional licensing scheme. Sampled artists will receive recognition and reasonable royalties, and samplers will be unhindered in their creative production processes. In an age when businesses survive on the purchase and sale of information, finding new ways to protect personal information is important.
Caller identification displays a caller's telephone number to the recipient of the call.
Businesses use the identified number to access personal information about the caller and to create mailing lists. Meanwhile, telephone companies make a tidy profit charging for number identification. Therefore, this Comment, rather than claiming caller identification violates constitutional privacy rights, argues that caller identification violates a caller's rights and tortiously appropriates his name and likeness. There have been many new developments in the music industry since the original bibliography was compiled. The earlier version contained articles from law reviews and journals almost exclusively.