Rebuttal of core issues are not usually excludable by the court. Defendant is well aware that the employees of the film studio changed their activities in response to his presence. The others are to ignore, to photograph picketers, or to counter picket. Defendant has seen all of these responses within the past year. Defendant has picketed in the San Jose area hundreds of times.
Defendant also believes the law was misapplied.
Neither does he have any idea of how to obtain a highly protected eagle or semi truck sized, million dollar weapons weapons closely held by a few national governments. It would be reasonable to assume defendant has the ability to throw a rock or other object over the fence at Golden Era. Though victims claimed to have such a fear, the fear has no rational basis since it was not claimed, much less proven, that defendant had made such a threat or even had implied such a threat. Any other activity such as driving on the same road behind a bus or watching apartments from a car or sidewalk are either not crimes or scientology has committed crimes against the defendant to a far greater extent than the defendant has against Scientology. The effect was to prevent the defendant from explaining to the jury an alternate motivation besides fear for the witnesses testimony.