The aim of the review process is to make an appropriate and timely decision on whether a submission should be published. Such decisions are based on proper review by well-qualified and impartial reviewers. Authors have the right to expect prompt, clear, and specific feedback. To facilitate this process, a submission must follow publication requirements and authors must be attentive in responding to questions. Once a submission has been accepted, authors can expect ACM to publish the work in a timely and professional manner.
Authors can expect to have approval of all changes to the work.
In addition, ACM will not cause authors to perform unnecessary efforts because of the system ACM uses to produce the publication. However, authors do have a responsibility to work with ACM to complete the publication process. And ACM expects authors to Speak with a one voice even if there are multiple authors Respond appropriately to reviews when creating the final version Perform needed copy editing Work with publisher and editor to satisfy design and quality constraints Dissemination Publication is only a part of the broader goal of disseminating ideas and results. Authors can expect ACM to contribute to this wider goal, and in particular not to discourage parallel dissemination. ACM can expect authors to acknowledge ACM's contribution and not to publish the same material in other publications.