This is a new page, discussion the issue of diversity from a Dooyeweerdian perspective. Dooyeweerd was particularly interested in unity in diversity, diversity in unity, and his ideas about sphere sovereignty and sphere universality provide a basis for these. In the future I want to collect together all that is said about diversity in the various other pages, but I will start by just putting down some unconnected jottings. Never 'The Answer' Because of the diversity inherent in the Dooyeweerdian aspects , we can never come to a final 'answer'. Thatcher's moneyterism was 'the answer' to socialism.
Constructivists is 'the answer' to positivism.
And so on. This is dialectical thinking. But we can never say we have found 'the answer'. Not just because it is rather arrogant to think so, but for a much deeper reason. The reason is that in many such cases the move from one pole to its opposite involves the elevation of one aspect to the elevation of another, that had previously been ignored.