Appellants' property also lacked adequate primary and secondary access, and was burdened by a road easement that appellants could not independently terminate. In a partial takings case, the measure of damages is the difference between the fair market value of the entire piece of property immediately before the taking and the fair market value of the remainder of the property after the taking. But at trial they were not prevented from presenting evidence that Red Pine Lane decreased the post-takings market value of their property. If the jury's special verdict finding can be reconciled on any theory, the verdict will not be disturbed. There was no error.
Appellants argue that the trial court erred by denying their new trial motion.
No new trial is necessary where, as here, there has been no error. Return to Vol.