In the case of morals, aesthetics, religion, and philosophy, such a dichotomy is not appropriate. Far from being one who has entered the light of scientific objectivity, the secular humanist is often involved in blind faith of the worst kind. It is always desirable to divest one's own world view of all burden of proof, while casting that burden entirely on an opponent. It is to these problems that we now turn. There is also the problem of the inability of man to live consistently with it.
All men including humanists hold for absolute values.
Also be aware of the biblical problem with conflicting moral values and with the best answers available. To the humanist there is no ultimate meaning to life. Yet no one lives in harmony with this view. The humanist is forced to live as if his life matters, thus belying his own belief. In view of the plausibility of the existence of God, it becomes difficult to see why such energy is expended trying to deny Him.