Many politicians, especially republicans, don't want that because it will mean the reapportionment of some seats. The Supreme Court acted in January. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 on Monday that a scientific method of counting Americans in the 2000 census, known as statistical sampling, cannot be used to enhance the census' accuracy. The opinion, written by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, says that the census law prohibits the use of sampling to adjust figures used to allocate congressional apportionment among the states. According to the decision, sampling may still be used to help draw lines of federal, state and local legislative districts and to distribute federal funds.
Direct marketers use demographic information from the census.
Some 4 million people were missed in the 1990 census, especially children and members of racial and ethnic minority groups, according to the Census Bureau. The ruling is a victory for the Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives who had filed the suit challenging the bureau's plan. The Clinton administration and the Democrats supported sampling, arguing that it would make for a more accurate count, though it would also add groups to the total that traditionally vote Democratic. We could just go out and count people, as Caesar Augustus did. We have to make a bigger effort than that.