Before trial began, the parties agreed on terms for settlement. The parties asked Judge Ross to approve the settlement's resolution of validity and construction issues. On 10 November 1997, after a hearing, Judge Ross allowed both guardians ad litem to submit written analyses of the issues before him. On 19 December 1997, Judge Ross entered judgment resolving all issues precisely as requested in the trustees' complaint. Each appellant assigns error claiming that the trial court's judgment is not supported by its findings of fact and conclusions of law as adduced from the evidence presented.
Appellants make no argument in support of their respective assignments of error.
Furthermore, based on their briefs, we conclude that appellants are not parties aggrieved. Thus, we dismiss the appeal. However, the instant case is distinguishable from Sternberger . Here, the issues decided regard purely private interests. There is no charitable trust involved.