We feel that he is incorrect in tying the entire discussion to the censor. It would be far easier to eliminate the censor along with the multilayered review process entirely and implement our suggestions. We have much to learn from our sister services in this area. They are by no means doing everything right, but then neither are we. The major difference is that we are not discussing in print the myriad solutions possible to the problems posed by the Soviets and the demands of warfare in the future.
Critical analysis is vital to our survival.
It is a very American thing. It should be encouraged. It should be required. It should not be hindered in any way. There is no subject too hot to be discussed.