Concurrency makes this illegal, requiring current taxpayers to pay for the infrastructure needs of future residents and businesses who are not yet part of the tax base. 2. encourages existing property owners to keep developable property scarce and property values high to discourage development. 3. works against the best interest of renters, future residents, and the owners of undeveloped property. The level of service requirements are also problematic. First a direct relationship does not exist between the amount of infrastructure and the level of service.
Congestion is a way of rationing the use of infrastructure, although it is an inefficient mechanism.
An efficient way of increasing the level of service of a given road would be to encourage commercial and shopping development in suburban areas. In this way, urban sprawl may lessen commute and travel times and distances. Two examples of state-induced sprawl are the University of Florida in Tampa and the University of Central Florida in Orlando which where built away from the population centers of those cities. Suburban and low-density development is discouraged by the Growth Management Act. When resources are allocated through the private sector of the economy, distributional issues are secondary because all parties have an incentive to structure trades so that everyone gains.