However, uniformity was rejected in the Constitutional Convention and it is not what thorough and efficient means. If it is then this is a justiciable case on some sort of standard of adequacy. What constitutes adequacy if then a legal matter. Judge Pellegrini disagreed. He thought that we had settled this issue with Marbury v.
Abuse of power is well within the purview of the courts.
Attorney for the Defendants said that each district would have to come in and say that it could not meet the standards laid out by the state, because it did not have enough funding. If the answer is dollar for dollar then the plaintiffs win and if the issue is adequacy then the defendants win. Is that it asked Judge Pellegrini. The Attorney for the defendants said yes. The judiciary should not interfere with the actions of the General Assembly.