The University's Intellectual Property policy describes fully the University's position on these matters. Whenever an arrangement is being considered that would restrict the faculty member's public disclosure of the existence of the arrangement. It is the University's policy that a faculty member should not undertake research in which the sponsor requires confidentiality of sponsorship. Whenever an arrangement would restrict the faculty member's public disclosure of information developed by the faculty member. In the case of a relationship with an external organization, the faculty member must ascertain whether there are requirements for confidentiality that might compromise his or her own fundamental rights of academic freedom or those of other faculty members or students.
Academic freedom means, in part, unhindered discussion and publication of results of research.
Whenever a faculty member's relationship to an external party might appear to influence either the conduct of the University's business or the conduct of research within the University. The appeal shall be made in writing setting forth the grounds for the appeal and must be received by the Dean within two weeks following the date of the decision from which the appeal is taken. In the case of an appeal by a Department Chair, the Committee shall comprise three members, one appointed by the Dean, a second by the Department Chair, and a third member to be selected by agreement of the Dean and the Department Chair. Should the faculty member dispute the decision of the Faculty Committee, he or she may appeal the decision to the Provost. The appeal must be in writing setting forth the grounds for the appeal and must be received by the Provost within two weeks following the date of the Faculty Committee's decision.