They could quickly accommodate new ideas related to their physics and thereby save considerable resources that would otherwise be required to start from the very beginning. Maybe the time has come to prepare a 'Red Book of Fusion' that would include the experimental facilities representing endangered and nearly extinct species and provide them the necessary protection. The feeling that we should look for something better than what we have at hand now is rather widespread among fusion physicists and engineers. I would think that some organizational framework could and should be created at both the national and international levels. This could be done on the basis of the large national research centres.
Concrete forms are yet to be developed.
Creative spirit and fantasy are required in administrative activity, probably not less than in physics itself. And Lev Andreevich, who was a very successful administrator, liked to emphasize the importance of this component for successful management. I am sure that, as has happened many times in the past, this part of the problem will also be solved to the benefit of fusion. If anyone perceives any 'antitokamak' stance in my talk, this is a gross misunderstanding. I think that it would be suicidal for the fusion programme to do anything that would undermine the ITER project or slow down the research on the conventional tokamaks and large inertial fusion devices.