Increased education is fine, if it can be balanced with a proper philosophical perspective. Chiropractors apparently have yet to find that balance. We still have many D.C.'s who talk about subluxation as a cause of disease rather than the cause of dis-ease. They claim that the intent of correcting the cause or a cause of disease is what separates chiropractic from medicine. Yet, historically, medicine has addressed causes of disease or at least what they think causes disease.
Antibiotics destroy bacteria which medicine claims causes disease.
Surgically removing a diseased organ cures the body of the diseased organ. The point is that chiropractic's claim to be different from medicine because it looks for a cause of disease is not a valid argument for our differences. Historically, it would not have appealed to any legislative body. Chiropractic was allowed to exist because it did not address disease but instead sought to correct the cause of dis-ease. Those who seek to adjust subluxation to correct a cause of disease are not doing anything different from those practicing medicine except that they are using a drugless manipulative approach for certain diseases.