For example, if a Dean brings forth an allegation, a designate shall be used to determine the merit of the allegation. It should be emphasized that this initial inquiry is informal and should allow flexibility for the dean to consult, clarify, investigate and mediate as each unique situation requires. This initial inquiry shall also be confidential. The Dean shall deal with the allegation by maintaining the highest possible degree of confidentiality so as to protect the reputation and careers of all involved, as well as the reputation of the University. Although this stage of the process should normally be completed within one calendar month of receiving the allegation, prudent management of the allegation may in some instances involve a longer elapse of time.
All relevant parties are to be notified in writing that a formal investigation is being undertaken.
The committee will address the charges of scholarly misconduct and determine whether or not they have merit. The committee will not comment on any action to be taken. Where required, the University will notify the appropriate funding agencies. The committee will undertake a formal investigation following the principles of natural justice and the rules of procedural fairness. It will examine and should have access to all materials necessary to carry out the investigation.