This changes the current ability to develop as commercial. All they want is what they had before in terms of property use. Hopkins asked if this case had been before the Plan Commission. Swain asked how this compared with the Downtown zoning change issue. Service said that the Plan Commission had been hearing for years that there is not enough industrial land.
Commercial land pays more.
White said that it was possible to do amendments from the floor. He felt that this was a good amendment. It was determined to vote on Amendment 42 as is. She said she thought that the property owner would be best to present it. Beth Gallman, property owner, said the Plan was made for RM 15, PRO 20 about 4 - 5 blocks and her house falls just beyond this zone, separated by a 12 foot alley.