Hence, it may be argued that divine omniscience cannot entail determinism. But this does not seem to be very good argument. A person's knowledge about the future action of an intimate friend of his at most a good guess and not definite knowledge. We can also apply this to human omniscience, where it is likely to create greater complications. It will mean that knowledge of the actions of other men.
Different people perform different actions, often quite contrary to that of their fellows.
This will create a difficult situation for the cognising mind if it is to be so determined. To say that the omniscient being is one who is justified in believing an infinitely large number of true synthetic Proposition is not only vague but also self contradictory. For example, it all depends upon the belief in one proposition at least. But this is to admit his omniscience and hence it is like arguing in a circle. Thus, the concept of omniscience whether logical or actual does involve difficulties.