The case plan in place at the time of plaintiff's injury does not obligate SRS to secure wraparound services in Alabama. The case plan explicitly contemplates that plaintiff was to locate and arrange for those services in Alabama, and SRS would fund the cost. In fact, plaintiff was successful in locating several services for J.P.S., including counseling services, a psychiatrist, and respite services. Finally, we reject plaintiff's claim that the general statutory and regulatory regimes that govern SRS contain attendant duties to provide services other than those which were provided to J.P.S. Plaintiff argues that the contract necessarily incorporates all of the statutes and regulations relating to SRS and that by not providing wraparound services, SRS violated these provisions. There is nothing in the statutes, however, which requires SRS to provide any wraparound services to a foster parent.
Defendant argues that plaintiff's claims are barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity.
This case, however, raises no tort claims and it is elementary that the state is not immune from liability based upon obligations it assumes under contracts.