To create better understanding in the public, it is a point that cannot be too often repeated. Our opportunities to educate the public about the nature of our work are greatly enhanced by television. It is a fact of our time. And it is an appropriate time to renew the debate about cameras in the courtroom. We long ago established the principle of open courtrooms with trials in full public view.
Cameras are simply the logical progression of the tradition.
The equipment used today has advanced considerably from the era of the lumbering studio cameras and blinding, hot lights. If we are truly sincere about our efforts and desire to make the public more aware about the work and role of our courts, cameras must be part of the process. The rules governing the presence of cameras were carefully drafted by the Supreme Court to protect the decorum and rights of the defendants and witnesses. The judge must control the use of cameras at all times. Capital cases, which generate the most interest, are heard regularly in Ohio.