This doesn't mean I have to wander around clueless, nor does it mean I can't have firm opinions as to what those true and good things might be. It just means that I've learned to live with the limitation of not being omnicient. I fill my tool bag as best I can, then I try and choose the right tool for the job. It's not that any of these tools are better or worse than any other, they are just better suited for some jobs than they are for others. The Tao is a useful way to look at things in many ways.
Anarchy is as well.
They both contribute to my understanding of how the universe works, but neither IS the universe. To me, people trying to use any one philosophical approach to cover all bases seem alot like people who try and use duct tape to fix everything. If an Amish approach seems best to you, then hitch up the team and find yourself a barn raising. We either need to convert the bloody infidels or stamp them out. Of course, one big reason they won't say this is because they know that, if they do, the Anarchists are going to be pretty pissed and will likely have some nasty unplesantries waiting.