You are invited to write your own commentary and make it similarly accessible. We can comment on the framework, as well as on each other's commentary, ad infinitem . Semi-fair is the most I could achieve. My points of view give rise to both my conclusions about computer security and my notion of the problem space. Nevertheless, I tried to construct a framework which a diversity of views would recognize as fairly posing problems any security paradigm should be willing to address.
Computer security is too big a topic for one big unstructured discussion.
Framework documents present rendezvous points for discussing the sub-topics. Note that neither Saltzer and Shroeder nor Wallach et al advocate capabilities, and I do propose that the discussion incorporate their taxonomy. If you feel this framework only good enough to criticize, please do so. With the Mediator making commentary navigable, such criticism may help us form a mutually acceptable framework. If you don't like the framework enough to help improve it, create your own framework and invite us to play in yours.