The human self-awareness can block every unwanted experience. Also in modern culture several obvious things aren't acknowledged, like for example the fact that everybody essentially is obliged to decide about her or his own life and death, so that nobody has the right to make this impossible by law or otherwise. So, for Alexander the Great the specialities were already existing, but in accordance with the then feminine culture they had to be united in an all-embracing universal whole. Nowadays it is no longer usual in philosophy to distinguish between feminine and masculine notions. That's understandable because modern analytical distinctions are neutral.
Analysis presupposes complete isolation.
Especially unlinking from associations with elusive, immaterial, spheres and meanings is an absolute must. Philosophical statements ought to be grounded on concrete, positive and measurable quantities. So the assertion that Alexander the Great's culture was characterized by a feminine way of contemplating reality is meaningless in the eyes of modern thinkers. Because they have no choice they resort to the ineradicable habit of equating masculine and feminine notions with concrete human male and female characteristics. In their eyes however these characteristics are only prejudices, products of ages of civilization.