Like a lot of people I began to see development partially in terms of dependency. I wrote my dissertation in some degree critiquing the idea of cultural dependency about Brazil, because I was interested in Brazilian television when I went there in 1976. I found that people were describing themselves and their media as very dependent. But when I looked at the Brazilian TV system, it didn't seem to be what I saw. Natural Resource Policy India Development is very much like globalization, it's a word that is both constructed and has some kind of a natural connotation.
Development comes from that domain of biological evolution.
It has been applied to an economic domain of engineered, imposed paradigms of what's society priorities should be. And exactly like globalization is made to look natural, development is made to look natural, and it's made to look like Third World societies were somehow stunted societies because they hadn't reached their full development. Development was then defined as the designs of Washington. The Washington mind set is not an evolutionary mind set regarding the future of multiple societies. It's an agenda of contemporary money lenders.