Again no premises are offered as proof. It is assumed without argument. The activists who are protesting the WTO press for controls on pollution emissions. Reducing pollution emissions would close factories in the Third World and harm the poor. The activists who are protesting the WTO are against biotechnology.
Biotechnology is good for poor farmers.
Therefore the activists who are protesting the WTO are harming the poor. One argument, really, with two proofs. The conclusion is that activism against the WTO harms the poor. So activism against the WTO harms the poor. In this case, both arguments have valid form.