Obviously many people do, and they may have good reason for doing so. Thus we can expect intelligent and useful criticism. That kind of criticism may be the major benefit of presenting a paper at national meetings. Even if you imagine that your results would interest only a small group of specialists, you might find that your analysis is actually of general, methodological interest. As most of us know, there are a variety of methods available for making all these kinds of inferences.
Different methods can yield different results.
Even when they do not yield different results, they are based on different principles and those principles enter into our choice among methods. DSEB is where we can look for informed feedback on our choices. I encourage you to think about the methods you find most useful in your own research, and those you would most like to learn. If you find certain methods useful or intriguing, I suspect many others will too. If we start thinking about this now, maybe we can pursue the idea of holding a general workshop on methods.