The idea of the social capital is not a new one for Kishinev. Thus, the social benefit is supplied for the entire territory corporation the base of prosperity of all the inhabitants of the city-corporation. The social capital gives the new understanding to the role of the state in the market formation. The power is the non-material recourse. On becoming the powerful official, the businessman in addition to changing his or her status, gains a non-material asset of great value.
Abuse of power damages the whole country undermining the confidence in the power itself.
Exactly in this context, it is necessary to carry out all the infrastructure transformations in the city in the area of power engineering, information science, transport etc. The present crisis is the crisis of confidence and consent, i.e. humanitarian in its nature. And it is impossible to find a way out of it without reorientation of the executive power of the country from sharing the material sources up to mastering the non-material humanitarian sources of the social administration. The local self-government is the main mechanism of consolidation and development of the social capital . The dilemma of parliament or president republic should be solved other than technocratically with reference to the abstract foreign experience, but in accordance with the criteria of the social capital applicable to the conditions of our reality.