In fact, other than a few powers relegated to Congress in Article 1, Sect. The intent of the Constitution was to create a weak federal government and empower state and local governments which have traditionally been more responsive to local needs. 3 of the order lays out the criteria for federal agency compliance. Instead, he only requires agencies to hear the concerns of state and local governments in response to any new regulations which are issued by these agencies. Any political watcher knows that despite how 'fair and equitable' this process may sound, most federal bureaucrats could care less what state and local governments think.
Bureaucrats are unelected and thus, accountable to no one.
The only entity that can devolve power from these agencies is Congress, either by voting to disband them altogether or by withholding their funding, which effectively kills them over a short period of time. But Clinton's order not only solidifies agency powers, it actually legitimizes them and requires them to take leading roles in helping the Executive Branch govern the country. It is akin to Royal Subjects who are responsible for implementing and enforcing the King's dictates. Since it is constitutionally mandated that each state have extradition from any other state, it is more proper to allow state and local authorities the autonomy to enforce each other's laws, especially when the original violation was not a federal violation. Clinton's order makes every state and local law a violation of federal law just by the virtue of having the suspect cross a state line.