The parties have not cited, nor have we been able to discover, any case law where crude sexual propositions have been found to breach the peace. Other forms of harassing or threatening language, however, have been found to breach the peace, even in the absence of abusive epithets. 150 Ill. App. The woman had previously sworn out a com- plaint against defendant's brother. Neither D.W. nor Davis discussed whether the threats were fight- ing words.
Defendant argues that only threats of immediate physical harm can constitute disorderly conduct.
Threats to destroy a reputation can violate a person's right not to be molested or harassed without justification, and Davis and D.W. make clear that the threatened harm need not be immediate. Defendant's threat, coupled with provocative language, was a form of mental and sexual harassment. These counts were not based upon overt threats, but upon unwelcome and offensive sexual remarks that were equally threatening. Sexual harassment is of such slight social value that it is not afforded first amendment protection. 273 Ill. App.