B appears in the North Dakota suit and seeks to defend on the merits, asserting that the Minnesota court lacked personal jurisdiction over B and thus its default judgment is not entitled to full faith and credit. B is personally served with summons while on an unrelated business trip in Minnesota. Appearing specially, B moves to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Same as 3, except B defaults and A then sues B on the default judgment in a state court in North Dakota. B appears in the North Dakota suit and seeks to defend on the merits, asserting that the Minnesota court lacked personal jurisdiction over B and thus its default judgment is not entitled to full faith and credit.
B is served by publication in a Minnesota newspaper.
B defaults, and A then sues B on the default judgment in a state court in North Dakota. B appears and seeks to defend on the merits, asserting that the Minnesota court lacked personal jurisdiction over B and thus its default judgment is not entitled to full faith and credit. A attaches B's land, publishing notice in a Minnesota newspaper. A attaches B's land, publishing notice in a Minnesota newspaper. A discovers that B owns a second parcel of land in Minnesota.