I don't want to give a creationist a forum. Of the thousands of scientific controversies, the creation-evolution controversy is the only one I know where some scientists refuse to exchange and discuss the evidence. That is an unscientific, closeminded position. Creation is a religious idea. It is not science.
Creation certainly has religious implications, but much scientific evidence bears on the subject.
Only the scientific aspects would be permitted in this written debate. An umpire would remove any religious, or antireligious, comments from the exchange. If my only comments were religious, the umpire would strike them from the debate. I would have nothing to say, and the evolutionist would win by default. Any debate should be in refereed science journals.