This type of livelyhood is wrong. The project target area is the area including all the nfs in that space regardless of who owns those features. A forest may be named even if it crosses private boundaries. A checklist fails if the target lands in question is only part of the original lands. Land cannot be intentionally split up to justify development.
Developers frequently use the term win win.
In reality, the natural features always lose. Disclosure of this environmental deception, by those pretending to speak for the environment, is one of the key reasons for the design of this checklist. If you have alternative suggestions they would also be very welcome. Examples and contact names are eagerly sought. I look forward to hearing from you.