I have great faith in a seed. My comments only intended to skim the surface of the myriad issues. I understood David questioned a mode of censorship - denying internet usage for the auction. I note there is a posting etiquette for this website as well as a general standard for its content so depending on your definition of censorship, it exists at many levels and many forms, in many cases with all good purpose. I am sure much of the anticensorship argument can be rationalised to the theorist's satisfaction, but exactly what food goes on the table puts the real truth in one's beliefs.
Arguments are more forceful when using what are extreme examples such as the nazi topic.
I have worked for war veterans and been exposed to innumerable war memorabilia incl POW camps etc. I am sure you would also agree Hitler should not have received daily briefings from the War Cabinet. I have read and viewed other material that is routinely censored. I am not a true student of this topic as my fellow contributors seem to be. In an ideal world, I would make all personal decisions with no outside instruction.