Although it is most appropriate for the qualified holder to fund, construct, and operate golf courses with their own resources, there are limitations that govern third party involvement. However, there may be circumstances where BLM will be requested to approve the qualified holder's subcontract with a third party. For example, a government-entity proposal to acquire lands to facilitate industrial development for the economic betterment of the community could not be allowed based solely on the speculative, secondary economic benefits that may accrue from such a project. Another example may be that the community needs more recreational facilities. The ultimate, or end, use of the land and applicant qualifications are the dominant considerations in determining whether a lease or conveyance is appropriate under the Act.
All charges are subject to review by the authorized officer as part of the compliance check process.
The subcontractor's ownership of the capital improvements constructed on the land, even if ownership will be transferred to the qualified holder at the end of the contract period. User fees that are based on other commercial golf courses in the same market. Use of market-based fees would be a strong warning sign to BLM to exercise caution. The right of the subcontractor to retain the fees collected and only transfer to the qualified holder a small portion thereof. The degree to which access to the facility will be available to, or limited to, use by the general public.