But it's worse than that, says Anthony Cordesman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. This became apparent during the U.S. military's involvement in NATO's recent conflict with Yugoslavia, he says. Furthermore, Pentagon leaders say some segments of U.S. forces continue to face significant spare parts shortages. In light of the military's projected budget crunch, analysts are circulating a variety of recommendations about how the military should make the best of it. One suggestion is to terminate one or more programs.
Analyses abound in Washington about which major programs are most deserving of termination.
But if history is any guide, Congress will probably not cancel any. Another alternative, then, is for the Pentagon to scale back one or more major programs. It could buy some new, more expensive weapons in fewer numbers and make up the difference by continuing to purchase or upgrade existing, cheaper models. The Pentagon at least is considered this option for the F-22. A study reportedly was launched this year to consider the benefits and drawbacks of buying much fewer then planned F-22s, along with some cheaper aircraft.