This is how the matter should be taught for the moment. If the Bohr Theory is ever replaced with something else, then that something else must come up with the goods on computer simulation. It is no argument to say that one has no flair for computer programming, since anyone who said they had no flair for mathematics would soon be shown the door by students of quantum mechanics. This author has disclosed all his trade secrets, along with model computer programs such as a numerical gravitational many-body solver, on this website, and cannot be expected to do any more than that. There is a possibility that a non-programmer could still come up with an alternative to the Bohr Theory, but this is very unlikely.
Any computer simulation faces a fair number of problems.
The main hurdle is probably Bell's Theorem. It has been shown by Charles Bennett that nonlocal quantum mechanical activity has indeed the flavour of the Vernam cipher anyway, so surely we are batting in the right court. The weak point in the Bohr Theory is its inability to say anything interesting about the kind of work done by Aspect and Bennett, and this is where the attack will come. This line of attack was initiated by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen in their famous paper of 1935, and developed further by David Bohm and John Bell prior to Aspect's definitive experiment. There are still many difficulties.