I am not against smaller parts, because, often, they are more fun to play than the leads. Leading roles, as a rule, are passive. Smaller parts are demanding, one has to work hard and not be passive. So, I prefer smaller parts, the money earned is not sufficient in either case. To be precise, one gets less for the leading part, because, compared to the smaller part, one has to do much more for almost the same amount of money.
Actors can never be in the same position as directors.
An actor gets paid for every performance, the director gets paid only while preparing the play, and that is all. It is normal that directors are much better paid than actors. An actor can play the same role for several years and still be paid for each performance. Of course, I am aware of the fact that directors in great measure style theatrical life here, but I find it normal. Svetlana helps me by not interfering in what I do.