Within the hemisphere, ICT infrastructure varies from country to country. Countries not encumbered by existing systems could invest in wireless technologies rather than implementing terrestrial or land-based infrastructures. There are different approaches to Connectivity. In determining which approach may be most appropriate for particular circumstances one must take into account the diverse languages, histories and cultures within our region and promote the inclusion of this varied content in our growing community of knowledge. In a knowledge-based economy, an active approach to the development of content focussed on topics such as education, skills training and the development and preservation of traditional and local knowledge, could help individuals become more active participants in the fabric of their communities, rather than passive observers of a technological system.
Connectivity promotes inclusion and addresses inequalities.
In conceptual terms, a Connectivity agenda represents a means of supporting the evolution of the community of the Americas as a political, economic and social space. The ability of Connectivity to overcome distance and reduce isolation should be emphasized in this context as a practical means of bringing the peoples of a vast hemisphere closer together. In political terms, hemispheric leaders could endorse the principles and leading objectives of Connectivity either within the Summit Declaration or in a separate Declaration on Connectivity for the Americas. This statement should first affirm the existence of a common commitment to democracy, cultural and social development and economic integration and the role of Connectivity as a means to achieve these ends. This principle should begin from the recognition that access to knowledge and information is fundamental to a democratic and prosperous society.