I prefer to call it the mind-body problem. And doubtful for most crisp interpretation I try. For exemple I believe cats are conscious.
Cats are capable of universal computation only in a very large sense.
Still I appreciate, but dangerous because most people will derive that animal are not conscious. You will see how time emerges in my approach. It is linked to consciousness, and basicaly I would agree, although the subject of experience is a person and not consciousness, which is a qualitative state of that person experiencing time. I don't see the relation with the prior distribution. I guess I miss something here.