Mitchell F. Thompson, Esq. Appellants argue that the back pay was erroneous because appellee failed to mitigate damages.
Appellants also seek a remand on the issue of the amount of damages.
In addition, appellants also appeal the trial court's denial of the Department of Law's motion to compel production of the defendants' tax returns. Haeuser was hired as an unclassified employee for a probationary term of two years. On or about 1April 1991, Haeuser was terminated from employment. After hearing the matter, the Superior Court found no equal protection violation, but did not explicitly address the Organic Act violation. Haeuser appealed the ruling to the Appellate Division of the District Court, which affirmed the Superior Court findings and held that there was no violation of the Organic Act.