Once you begin to do that then the whole conventional morality bit is in tatters and its facile apologists are exposed as the philistines they are. It had become obvious that the law forbidding the practice of male homosexuality was an unenforceable anachronism that served merely to penalise and persecute those men who, by nature, are homosexual. Under CAP, morality resides where it properly should reside - in the grounds upon which defensible consents can be exchanged between prospective sexual partners. Properly applied, the sound and sensible criteria for consent might well result in a more exacting morality than conventional morality has ever done. All three words in CAP have to be given full weight.
Consent has to mean informed consent given in general awareness of what is entailed thereby.
What is more, the granting of consent has to be accompanied by an agreed right to withhold or withdraw consent at any stage. Adult has to mean mature and capable of giving informed consent. This requirement rules out the sexual use of children, mentally retarded, emotionally disturbed or other vulnerable people. Private also means that a consenting adult sexual partnership should be neither intruded upon, nor even inquired into as of right, by third parties. In short, one's sexual privacy must be respected.