You have developed a circular argument regarding your method of interpreting scripture. First, you say that the Bible teaches evolution. Then you say that the evidence, properly interpreted, supports evolution. Then, that that evidence should be used to re-interpret the bible. This reasoning is a tautology and provides no self-correction for error.
Any argument needs an independent external control.
In the TE vs. creation debate, it is scripture. We cannot use the force of reason to reinterpret God's word. As for physical evidence, we live in an accursed, corrupted world. The evidence must speak to that corruption. Since evidence is in fact not holy, it cannot be the arbiter of scripture.