The key point is that knowledge is more than mere possession of information. I read a gauge or meter with no idea whether it is functioning properly. There is a classic example of a clock that has stopped running but is showing the correct time. It is a verbal dispute to argue over whether this is the proper sense of 'knowledge'. But on the side of information, there are the achievements of science and institutions.
Analysis is relative to a purpose.
Either theory of knowledge is a theory of the meaning of 'know' and cousins or it is a theory about how people come to know. The specification of the conditions and the explanation of how they can be satisfied yields a theory of knowledge. By analogy, a philosopher wishes to know under what conditions a person knows that p . But this is not the purpose of the present analysis. Debt is acknowledged to Carnap and Quine.