It is usually everything and therefore, nothing. However, let us go to one of those experienced homeopaths you are so fond of, one with over 40 years of study and practice, Dr. Eizayaga. So, if you will not take it from me, take it from him. I am serious. It is you who raised the charge of experience and the suggestion that the truth of a proposition is dependent on experience.
Acts speak louder than words.
This seems very much like the allopathic definition of cure in cancer cases. You may be content with the few that were cured using your classical methods, but I am concerned with the many more that are not helped. I, too, can cite many cured cases. That they are cured cases seems not to be denied by those who have seen them. Yet, by definition, a cure must involve the use of the main pillar of homeopathy, the law of similar resonance, but applied according to the subprinciples laid down in the Organon for each dimension of disease.