Approximately 4-6 hours were spent at each university reviewing current project status as well as technical and functional impact of the system on the university. Upon completion of these phases, the HRIS Evaluation Team was confident that it had sufficient information to award points to each proposer. The functional requirements of the HRIS include both mandatory and preferred requirements. Each requirement is worth 10 points. The performance profile identifies those characteristics of the vendor which we believe to be relevant to an association with the University.
Characteristics are both qualitative and quantitative.
The intent is to ensure the University a level of confidence in the proposer's ability to work with the University and provide a high probability of success for the project. Each item is worth up to 20 points. The proposer's capability provides a structure which allows the HRIS Evaluation Team to evaluate all qualitative and quantitative information gathered during the HRIS proposal evaluation and recommendation process. Each vendor and their RFP response was objectively evaluated in each category to determine the most qualified proposer. Points were awarded based upon a comparison of each vendor to the HRIS capabilities of the most qualified HRIS proposer.