B.The ordinance would probably be found to be constitutional because it would further governmental interests in esthetics and reducing visual clutter. C.The ordinance would probably be found to be unconstitutional because governmental interests in esthetics and reducing visual clutter are not sufficient justifications for banning speech. D.The ordinance would probably be found to be unconstitutional because the distinctions between the types of billboards banned are content based and have no bearing on the interests asserted. Plaintiff, a California resident, is defamed by a New York newspaper, which distributes thousands of copies in the state of New York, but which has a regular circulation of only thirteen copies in California, pursuant to subscriptions it did not solicit. Plaintiff sues the newspaper in California.
Defendant moves to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.
Based on the materials studied in this course, A.Defendant's regular circulation of thirteen copies in California is a sufficient basis for jurisdiction to be constitutionally permissible. B.The fact that the target of the defamation is a California resident is a sufficient basis for jurisdiction to be constitutionally permissible. The combination of defendant's regular circulation of thirteen copies in California and the fact that the target of the defamation is a California resident constitutes a sufficient basis for jurisdiction to be constitutionally permissible. D.Jurisdiction is not constitutionally permissible. A well known Governor who is a former professional wrestler decides to run for re-election.