It would be sufficient if the editors would dare to do without the publication of intercalary criticism among the works they publish, so we wouldn't notice their absence. It's possible, it's within reach, but someone has to dare to be first. Not to publish any more architectural criticism. I think in Darwinist terms. Before disappearing, the superfluous organs, that don't participate in the active life of the individual, and have become ineffective, mask their superfluity and exhibit a last magnificent expansion as an ornament.
Architecture criticism is nowadays such a blaze.
It is an ornamental type, a literary accompaniment. That's why we know that tomorrow they won't exist. Here is an example. Leonardo da Vinci. Antonello de Mesina.