Conclusions Four points are important in this survey, partly in regard to art and architecture, partly in view of religion. This is most clearly expressed in the symbol at the top of the pillars . But it is very evident that they have 'copied' the grass-symbol of the pillar in temple 4 . The grass symbol tells us the meaning of the uppermost symbol. At the same time this indicates that the grass type is the primary type , the permanent types are derived from it.
All pillars stand strictly in axial relation with the coordinated sanctuaries and deities.
This strict axial relation of two different demarcation systems reflects a superseding process. A primary demarcation system has been replaced by a more evolved one, definitely a materially permanent one . Thus, the rites related to grass, that is to the originally primary and most important fibroconstructive markers, have a framing function in the cyclic cult which now includes also more evolved types. We can therefore assume that on the one hand these pillars evolved physically from the fibroconstructive type , on the other hand, more in the sense of religion, the fibrous demarcators and their harmonious categorical expression must have corresponded to the ancient teachings cyclically preserved into later times. The world is composed of an endless multitude of vertical and horizontal polarities is a gigantic truth which we can only start to understand with modern anthropological methods.