In a way there should be no need for a conference, meeting, or even discussion of ipr jurisdiction. Since they all pay lip service to the fact of territoriality, it just comes down to r especting a judgment in a foreign jurisdiction of acts taking place in that same foreign jurisdiction subject to that foreign jurisdictions own ip laws. There is really nothing notable about that. Since the same textdual laws aree being introduced by globalization, what they are conspiring to do is then reach the conclusion that according to comity not only should a jurisdiction recognize a truly foreign judgment about foreign facts, but all jurisdictions should adopt the same conclusions in their own jurisdictions. This is not therefore about respecting foreign judgments.
All countries have the same text.
Treating the same text with the same facts should reach the same conclusions. All countries should recognize the conclusions about texts rendered by foreign jurisdictions.