All data sets appear to show both second and third peaks.
At first glance, it does appear that the there is more power in the third peak than predicted by the no-CDM model. Reality could be, and at some level must be, more complicated. The model has not been adjusted in any way from what was previously published. Goodness of fit with no attempt to re-fit model and accounting only for tabulated errors. Any model which fits the first peak as defined by the remainder of those points will pay a comparable penalty.