That is, each state will receive monies based on some determined formula. Both bills need to emphasize nongame species. Neither bill currently includes the specific priority of funding nongame wildlife. The TWW effort has never said that nongame wildlife should be the only beneficiary of this new funding, but has stressed that nongame should be clearly emphsized. Language on public participation needs further explanation, outlining what kinds of participation the states should pursue as part of fulfilling their obligations under the new legislation.
Conserve habitat from forests to marshes.
Interpret the natural world at wildlife viewing areas, along roads, and in recreational areas. Offer wildlife educational programs, activity guides, and curricula for schools and community groups. Both versions are beginning to generate some bipartisan support. The window of opportunity to show our own support for this strong conservation effort is right now. There is some evidence that legislators count one letter as representing 25 or more constituents.