Circumcision has always been a one-sided argument. Medically, there's absolutely no foundation for routine infant circumcision. A physician's duty is to heal the wounds, not inflict them. It is total arrogance to think improvements can be made on a design which took nature millions of years to perfect. The foreskin is a highly specialized tissue with several functions.
Circumcision totally defeats the purpose of penile sensitivity, and the glans develops calluses.
Cut males often complain of reduced sensitivity, yet there's little complaint from intact males of this sort. However cut males are not given the benefit of the doubt, even though a cut penis loses its most sensitive nerves. Condoms reduce sensitivity further and this makes sexual intercourse difficult and frustrating for many males, since erection is dependent on feeling. As a result, this discourages many males from using condoms. Unfortunately this is a typically American phenomenon.