These gaps include concern over the way that evidence is gathered by public employees in a legal case, the decision handed down by a court or the manner in which a public program is implemented. Not only would ratifying the Optional Protocol provide a strong impetus to fill those discrepancies or failings in our current system, but from an international perspective, Australia has a moral obligation and an opportunity to show leadership and set standards for women throughout the world. Women from the Pacific region have strongly urged Australia s adoption of the Optional Protocol to demonstrate leadership in the Pacific and assist the adoption of the Protocol in their own countries. We are disgusted by John Howard's refusal to promote the rights of women. This Government is tacitly approving the acts of rogue nations that violate women's rights.
Australian women expect more.
Non-Government Organisation, Human Rights Watch said in a press release , that the Howard government s decision to distance itself from the UN treaty bodies was particularly disappointing because in many areas, Australia has been a champion of human rights. However, they did point out that Australia s support for human rights abroad has not always translated into good policies at home. It has clearly signaled its willingness to dismiss the rights of the vulnerable including indigenous Australians, women and refugees as secondary needs of the state. Disclaimer and Copyright Information.