This includes students who are subsidized and often continue to have the unopened journals pile up long after they graduate or stop paying student membership. This too means getting serious. Sure, its like pulling hens' teeth to get the information for each issue so all members of the Society must get serious. These tough questions are being asked by members of the committee and their report is overdue. The recommendations may be a contentious issue for the bear pit session at the Toronto Annual meeting.
Authors are to suggest three referees.
If these are not submitted, the editor will email the corresponding author for suggestions. The editor will review the paper to see if it is of sufficient quality to proceed with the review process. If it is not, the paper will be returned to the corresponding author. Suggestions may be made as to how the paper might be made acceptable for the review process. The editor will fax or email the paper abstract along with the suggestions for reviewers to the appropriate associate editor.