With respect to these directions in time, they exhibit development and can be used to influence and be influenced by the growth of human culture. All historical properties involve a connection to human cultural formation, in one way or another. Objects have the ability to be represented linguistically. To the extent that they do, objects have social properties. The value they have as a result of their supply and the demand for them is a peculiarly economic value.
All properties relating to the scarcity and conservation of such non-endless abundance are economic.
In calling objects beautiful, ugly, gaudy, clumsy, elegant, etc. we are ascribing to them aesthetic properties. While not subjects of the state, objects can be the subjects of political dispute. People are the primary subjects of moral properties, and, of course, only they are properly moral or immoral. But inanimate objects have ethical properties derivatively as the subjects of moral or immoral human actions. This is more than just a moral notion.