93-1850, the Commission considered the public interest aspects of local exchange competition for dedicated transmission service similar to that described in the application before us now. In dockets CP 1, CP 14, and CP 15, Order No. 96-021, the Commission made several public interest findings regarding local exchange competition in general. The Commission's Findings of Fact and Opinion in docket UM 381, Order No. The Commission takes official notice of the record in dockets UM 381, CP 1, CP 14, and CP 15. In Order No. 93-1850, docket UM 381, the Commission granted pricing flexibility for dedicated transmission service at the time the Commission granted the certificate of authority.
Applicant seeks authority to provide dedicated transmission service.
United are granted pricing flexibility in the exchanges listed in Appendices A, B, C and D for dedicated transmission service. Beaver Creek is a cooperative telephone company. As such, it is generally not regulated by the Commission for local exchange services, and therefore already has pricing flexibility for local exchange service. Applicant is designated as a competitive telecommunications provider for intraexchange service in the exchanges listed in Appendices A, B, C, D and E. 3. The local exchanges of USWC listed in Appendix A, those of GTE listed in Appendix B, those of PTI listed in Appendix C, and those of United listed in Appendix D, and that of Beaver Creek are designated as competitive zones.