In the last 30 years, however, there has been considerable movement of popular, academic and governmental opinion toward the end of the spectrum that favors collaboration as long as government does not breach the wall against establishment, discrimination and coercion. The provision of food, clothing, shelter and medical care for the poor is the government's responsibility. Private agencies can furnish safety nets for those the government does not reach, but they are the secondary providers, not the main ones. Unless there are additional funds, the plan will be a mirage. The poor won't be getting more help unless there is more money.
Agencies can refuse any aid that comes with hampering strings attached.
If regulations require them to deny their identity, they should decline to collaborate. They should not, however, expect total funding for their programs. If government provided all the money, it would call the tune. Faith-based groups must make a significant contribution, if there is to be real collaboration. Yes, if they get results and the secular alternatives of which the President spoke are also available.