In the United States Court of Federal Claims No.
Defendant alleges that the opinion is premised upon three errors of law.
A new trial or rehearing or reconsideration may be granted to all or any of the parties and on all or part of the issues, for any of the reasons established by the rules of common law or equity applicable as between private parties in the courts of the United States. On motion under this rule, the court may open the judgment if one has been entered, take additional testimony, amend findings of fact and conclusions of law or make new findings and conclusions, and direct the entry of a new judgment. The decision to grant a motion for reconsideration lies within the sound discretion of the court. To prevail on a motion for reconsideration, the movant must point to a manifest error of law or mistake of fact. The movant does not persuade the court to grant such motion by merely reasserting arguments which were previously made and were carefully considered by the court.