To say that Yahweh erred morally would be the death knell for the inerrancy doctrine, so inerrantists must defend baby killing while usually condemning abortion. Lindell Mitchell refused to defend the massacre of the Amalekites, but he did agree to deny that it was an atrocity. The debate will continue through the Spring 1994 issue. In addition to The Skeptical Review , Skepticism, Inc., publishes other materials that might be useful to those wishing to hone their skills on the subject of Bible inerrancy. Although Laws challenged, he quit after only three manuscript exchanges and has since refused to accept mail from Till.
Correspondence is reproduced in the booklet.
Recently revised to expand its scope. The myth of Bible inerrancy can be easily exposed by two or more writers. Quite often, the telling of the same story a second or third time resulted in noticeable discrepancies. An example of glaring inconsistency can be found in the two accounts of the death of Saul, the first king of Israel, as told by the writers of 2 Samuel and 1 Chronicles . Both writers claimed that Yahweh engineered Saul's death because of his disobedience, but the two versions of his disobedience differ significantly.