Complaint claims he was dismissed on the basis of his disability. Complainant did pre-employment typing test and passed well. Complainant was given documents to fill out and was advised she had secured an interview with second respondent for position. Following the interview the agency rang the complainant and advised she was successful but had to go for a medical. Complainant claims that Agency later rang and advised because of her RSI and that she wore glasses she no longer had the position.
Complainant claims disability discrimination.
Complainant claims she could fulfill the inherent requirements of the position and noted that she usually wore glasses for computer work. Complainant has hearing implairment, and required an auslan interpreter but respondent said don't need one because complainant can speak. Complainant had difficulty in the interview and couldn't hear all that was asked of him. Complainant claims discrimination on the basis of disability. Complainant is employed as a teacher at respondent school.