Given that cognitive science did not exist in 1936, perhaps we may forgive Adler here. In contrast, human-kind has conceptualizing mind through embodiment of Aquinas' 'essence' or conceptualizing existence, whereby it generates conceptual properties to populate its cognitive level of reality. Let me paraphrase this in terms of my organism experience view. This is very timely in the light of the effort of cognitive science to attempt to 'forcibly' reduce mind to computation. In order to practice interdisciplinary science, a new 'continuous tradition' needs to be developed, one in which the various disparate jargons become subsumed into a universal means of communication.
Any jargon is learned or invented through active participation in the details.
If an interdisciplianry team is to work together, each individual must inform himself about the basics of all the other participants. In searching for references to Aquinas, I focussed on Adler's lecture two. It denies that matter exists apart from forms, and that the forms of matter exist except in matter. It denies that the only forms of matter are quantitative. This is a mandate for specialization and a jargon-filled tower of Babel.