It applies to everyone. My point is that the atheist cannot condemn him because he does not have a universal ethic. Hitler's ethic has equal status as the relative ethic of the atheist. There is no way to judge one being superior to the other. I don't, again you are arguing my point.
Condemnation can only be rational with a universal ethic.
The argument from ignorance. So 1 is unclear. Because 1 is unclear, it cannot be disproven. It is irrational for an atheist to condemn someone's behaviour because the atheist only has a subjective ethic with is no more than a matter of taste or preference. Which really means that the atheist has no ethic at all.