Thorough and balanced discussion of how each artist transformed observed reality in order to achieve a personal vision. Adequate discussion of how each artist transformed observed reality in order to achieve a personal vision. Specific artists or works may or may not be mentioned. OR Only 1 artist and 1 work is discussed fully and well. Specific works may or may not be mentioned.
Discussion is weak, lacking an adequate understanding of the issue.
Makes an attempt, but the answer is without merit because it restates the question, merely describes the works, or makes only incorrect statements. This is a nonresponse, such as a blank paper, crossed-out words, notes on summer vacations, teachers, etc.