Conformation is discussed so frequently because it often is what makes horses better able to perform their job, or at least can help them have longevity in regard to performance. Horses with good conformation are prized and usually more valuable than a counterpart with poor conformation. In this article, we will discuss the good, the bad, and the just plain ugly aspects of conformation in horses. Conformation, according to Ted Stashak, DVM, who wrote The Horseowners Guide to Lameness , is the outline of a horse as dictated primarily by his bone and muscle structures. However, conformation is not just straight legs, it also is about the length of the bones, the angles of the joints, and the proportions and overall balance of the horse.
Conformation is related to the breed and use of the horse.
For example, a Quarter Horse used for Western pleasure will have a different ideal conformation than an Arabian used for saddleseat, especially in regard to desired muscling, length of neck and back, straightness of the top line and croup, and way of traveling. So, some aspects of conformation really do depend on breed and purpose. While it would be easier to fill the entire magazine with descriptions of desirable conformation for each breed or type of horse, instead we will concentrate on undesirable conformation, which practicaly is the same for all breeds. Conformation in horses should be evaluated carefully, and all good judges, veterinarians, and horse owners should have a system to prevent missing any aspect. Each person has a system which works for him, so if you are curious, ask a respected individual in your area, or attend a judging clinic.