Appellant offers no further discussion regarding why the district court erred by not awarding the rental property to her. See Schoepke v. We exercise our discretion to address this issue. See Minn. R. Civ. As stated previously, a district court has broad discretion in dividing marital assets.
Discretion includes, when appropriate, ordering the sale of marital property.
Here, the district court determined that appellant would not be financially able to care for the parties' rental property. The court was concerned with the high attorney fees both parties were facing due to the length of the dissolution proceedings. The court ordered the property to be sold based on the testimony of appellant that her monthly expenses exceeded her limited income. The court also considered respondent's testimony regarding the cost of upkeep for the property. In addition, appellant had nonmarital living quarters available.