This matter comes before me on Respondent's Motion For Summary Decision. Complainant filed a Response thereto and Respondent filed a Reply. The motion is ripe for decision.
Complainant contends there are issues of fact which preclude summary decision.
Respondent is a Canadian corporation which provides security services and products to office, retail, residential, and industrial buildings throughout the United States and Canada. Between approximately April and August of 1992, Respondent interviewed candidates for security officer positions to work at Illinois Center. Respondent was not obligated by its contract to consider any CCS employees for positions and Respondent did not guarantee any CCS employees positions. In the first half of 1992 and for some years prior thereto, Complainant, age 78, was an employee of CCS and worked as a security officer at Illinois Center. Complainant was one of the CCS employees who applied to Respondent for a security officer position.