Plaintiffs contends that the contract should be rescinded based upon failure of consideration, frustration of purpose, and illegality.
Defendants contest the validity of plaintiffs legal assertions.
Summary judgment must be granted where there exists no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The material issues of facts necessary to resolve this action are not in dispute. The only differences remaining between the party is the application of controlling law. Law 25 etseq. It is well established that when, as here, a constitutional or statutory provision exists, it governs what constitutes public policy.