The complaint alleged that the defendants misrepresented the earnings consumers would realize, the existence of established relationships with doctors, and an unconditional refund policy. The default judgments against Williams and Green, and the proposed Dickson settlement which requires the court's approval, prohibit the defendants, in connection with the sale of similar opportunities or any business ventures, from misrepresenting earnings, the existence of established relationships with doctors, or unconditional refunds. Finally, the proposed settlement contains various recordkeeping provisions to assist the FTC in monitoring defendants' compliance. The Commission vote to authorize staff to file the proposed Dickson settlement was 5-0. The stipulated final judgment and order is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by the defendant of a law violation.
Consent judgments have the force of law when signed by the judge.