But something like the Christian idea of God has got to be true to account for morality. Hinduism, for example, simply won't work, because in Hinduism there is no ultimate distinction between good and evil. The kind of morality that we've been talking about just doesn't fit in a Hindu world view, but it does fit into a theistic, Christian world view. So if absolute morality is true, then Hinduism can't be true. Atheism is false.
Agnosticism is untenable.
It takes us a long way, much farther than we may have thought in the first place. There is a conclusion to this, and it's a direct answer to his question. My point is to look at what seems to be the obvious existence of moral absolutes and to then look and see where that observation leads us, and it seems to lead us to the existence of a God who makes those moral rules because moral rules are designed kinds of things that don't make themselves, it appears. And it seems that a very good explanation for their existence is that a God with moral character made a set of moral rules that express His character and those rules then become absolutes which are incumbent upon us. Now there is a lot more that we could talk about.