I'm no art critic, and in fact have no experience in the field. I believe, however, that those who are willing to criticize the opinions of a fellow fan in the realm of art is contradictory. I believe that art is what the artist makes of it.
Creativity is an outlet for emotion, often resulting from personal innovation, and growth.
Howeverm there is a more inherent talent that an artist must be endowed with before making their work public. Many modern artists may lack this, and use the creative aspect of the field as an excuse to put whatever they want on the canvas. In response, specifically, to Q's post, I feel that his accusing the last person of having a biased opinion inadvertantly revealed his own biases and shortcomings. Art IS something to be viewed by the open- minded, and their IS room, in my opninion, for innovation, however, while creativity fuels the field, we must not forget that it also needs to be built on a foundation of natural talent, rather than simple cubes, sloppy strokes, and fecal matter spattered on abstract images of holy figures. Modern art has taken center stage, and the need for detail to make vivid images has been forgotten.