Therein lies the clue for conservative compassion to follow. The thing that's missing from these scenarios of compassion is the inherent damage to the dignity of the person receiving the charity. I acknowledge that there are clearly many people who are destitute enough or helpless enough so that they have no choice, but I dare say that only a modest percentage of people below the poverty level are in this category. This is one fatal flaw of most liberal compassion. This is the core of the difference between conservative and liberal compassion.
Conservatives have more reverence for the dignity of people below the poverty level.
The liberals, on the other hand, invent terminology to deceive the people who receive their largesse to hide the demeaning aspect of their compassion. A rising number of blacks are now voicing this concern. Conservative compassion acknowledges the importance of this pride. Fundamentally we'll try to provide an exchange whereby those in poverty will provide something of value in return for the adequate necessities of life. It will provide the physical necessities in return for something the receiver can offer in exchange.