In addition, Bailey would be prohibited from making any false or misleading representation about a material fact regarding any good or service he markets in the future. Based on financial statements Bailey submitted, the consent judgment does not call for consumer redress. The Commission vote to file the proposed consent judgment was 5-0. It was filed April 27 in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Lexington Division. This consent judgment is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by the defendant of a law violation.
Consent judgments have the force of law when signed by the judge.
Copies of consent judgment and other documents associated with this case are available from the FTC's Public Reference Branch, Room 130, 6th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.