Complainant says respondent knew he had a disability and required regular breaks to accommodate requirement to eat and drink. Complainant claims he approached respondent about vacancies for word processing positions and was told they do not handled those positions. Complainant claims he later heard a respondent employee give dates to someone for word processing work and then saw an advertisement in the paper for word processing vacancies. Complainant then applied and was told he spoke too slowly and was not effervescent enough. Complainant claims these are manifestations of his psychiatric disability and respondent has discriminated against him on basis of disability.
Complainant has a disability and uses a wheelchair for mobility.
Complainant states bus is accessible but requires driver to put down ramp. The same driver later again refused to carry complainant. Compensation Complaint Summary Complainant has had polio and has a mobility impairment. Complainant booked flight to Melbourne with respondent. On the day of the flight complainant was told he couldn't take his dog and respondent refused to allow him on the flight.