I am a friend to neology . It is the only way to give to a language copiousness and euphony. Their rule was that whenever their language furnished or adopted a root, all it's branches, in every part of speech were legitimated by giving them their appropriate terminations. And this should be the law of every language. Thus, having adopted the adjective fraternal , it is a root, which should legitimate fraternity, fraternation, fraternisation, fraternism, to fraternate, fraternise, fraternally.
Dictionaries are but the depositories of words already legitimated by usage.
Society is the work-shop in which new ones are elaborated. When an individual uses a new word, if illformed it is rejected in society, if wellformed, adopted, and, after due time, laid up in the depository of dictionaries. And if, in this process of sound neologisation, our transatlantic brethren shall not choose to accompany us, we may furnish, after the Ionians, a second example of a colonial dialect improving on it's primitive. It's croud of scepticisms kept me from sleep. I call them matter .