The school of medicine that derives from this theory works with pleomorphism rather than static concepts of microorganisms. Pleomorphists use live blood rather than blood that has been fixed and stained for use in electron microscopes. The thoughtforms that build around such theories are also more flexible. I realize that if one has never thought about such matters before, what I am writing now sounds like the ranting and raving of an iconoclast, but I am not crazy and the Pasteur was not anyone to celebrate. The final debate was not with Bernard but Antoine Bechamp who died without being able to set the records straight.
Countless studies prove that pleomorphism is correct.
The conclusive studies are those involving bacteria and viruses. Bacteria appears despite the care taken to remove it, proving that viruses mutate into bacteria and vice versa depending on the environment. None of this would be important except that it provides another way of looking at cancer and incentive for those who so choose to expend as much effort on inner healing as on cytotoxic protocols. Sorry not to use a more technical term, but I see cells that are complaining of the environment in which they are living. They describe difficulty breathing.