Hell, no, it was worth well more than that. Those types of nuances are something we cannot effectively capture using the accounting system we have in baseball. We often glibly make the assumption that for each tremendously valuable steal, there are others that are of little to no value whatsoever, so our models are still highly precise and accurate. We need to keep in mind that we don't know as much as we think. I used to hate this argument when it was turned against me in rec.sport.baseball many years ago, because its proponents tried to discredit all of statistical analysis.
Analysis is valuable, certainly.
But there are limits to its utility, and we need to be very careful not to place too much emphasis on this kind of iterative modeling. Our models are built on enough assumptions about baseball, data, and the world that we need to turn a skeptical eye on them at every opportunity, just like we do to conventional wisdom. What we don't know could fill a book. Perhaps even an annual one. Gary Huckabay is an author of Baseball Prospectus.