The case at bar involved a contentious and highly controversial religious dispute that resulted in Hindus destroying a Muslim temple. The Indian lawyers, who argued in English, cited several U.S. Supreme Court decisions to bolster their arguments, O'Connor said. They even cited several opinions she had written. But the opinion came out the way I would have written it. The three also discussed the changing face of the judiciary in Russia and China.
China has an enforcement ethic but no constitutional objective.
I call China a law in search of a theory. Breyer noted that many nations don't have the same press freedoms as the United States and that hinders the development of an open and honest bench. Of course, the press knows how much we make. Of course, the press writes it up to the last penny. Of course, it's irritating.