And if the methods and statistical results of the supposed research are not available, they cannot be checked and duplicated as the scientific method calls for. Anyone can make as many outlandish claims as he wants, but the research must be accessible and reproducible to support those claims if he brandishes scientific validity. Dianetics is designed as a how-to manual for psychoanalysis. But this seems a bit reckless. This sounds more like quackery than therapy.
Children often have engrams that are restimulated by their parents.
Hubbard states that it may be necessary to remove the children from their parents if this is the case, until the engrams are processed. Here again we have Hubbard making an outlandish proposal of splitting families in order to produce healthier people. Take it, I tell you. Cellular recordings of sounds by the cells can even be in another language unknown to the adult or child and still cause similar problems. All of this, again, has no evidence accompanying it, and without such evidence it may as well be classified as mere science-fiction.