If this boundary is loose enough then we are able to see it one way, and then the other, and see the truth in both. As I say, I have not yet familiarized myself with Derrida's more recent political writings, this does fit my picture of Derrida's concept of differerAnce and deconstruction . For Derrida, the world around us is like an ambiguous figure. You look at it one way, and it's a duck. You look at it another and it's a rabbit.
Deconstruction is a way of bringing the repressed way of seeing back to consciousness.
Say that's the rabbit. The alternative way of seeing things, the duck, is suppressed from public consciousness. And, if deconstruction is available in the conversation, there is a movement back and forth between the two images of the world. Moving back and forth between the two images , creates something that I liken to a three-dimensional vision, a richer image of the world and our experience than the simplified picture makes possible. Larner talks about this process very well, in my judgment.