Hlubik confuses this basic clarification of what is of vice and virtue, his resulting definition of Christian love is consequently also contorted. Most certainly all people, both gay and straight, are deserving by their human dignity of unqualified love and respect. Indeed, gays suffer real injustice if society does not assist them toward virtue. Not all who may be inclined toward this orientation are at peace with its persuasion over mind and body. Prejudice, hatred and disdain must never be permitted.
Authentic love demands true discrimination.
One, in the pursuit to be fully human, must always discriminate in the true quest for love, that therefore demands the boundaries of right and wrong, good and evil. To in any way foster lifestyles that deliberately thwart the universal and necessary quest for the virtue of chastity is fundamentally incorrect, either in the homosexual or heterosexual community. Rights are derived by inalienable and intrinsic natural laws that must be protected by legislation by the empowered civil society. The failure of the heterosexual community to live by chaste virtue is not a license for even greater sexual perverseness. Herein is the crux of this controversy.