Given that PJM should be finished with their plan by the time you read this, it is unclear why confidentiality is required. We agree on this point. Therefore, PJM ought to make public information pertaining to the success or failure of the implementation of their plans. The public needs to know the degree to which they ought to be prepared for electrical grid failures. The ability to be prepared will increase the public's comfort level.
Actual information is much more comforting than mere assurances.
In PJM's stated spirit of cooperation, the public should be continually informed and updated as to the status of PJM's contingency plans and how they're progressing during the course of the remainder of the year. In conclusion, PJM's petition is moot, since Attachment C has already been made publicly available.