It was thus logical that he was given such task. Petitioners claim that the same Crispin Briz was the administrator of their father over the same property until Lucio Brion took over as caretaker. We are not persuaded. As found by the trial court, Crispin Briz was a total stranger to petitioners and Lucio Brion was not even presented as a witness. It is concerned with lapse of time in the manner and under conditions laid down by law, namely, that the possession should be in the concept of an owner - public, peaceful, uninterrupted and adverse.
Acquisitive prescription is either ordinary or extraordinary.
276 SCRA 601 citing Arts. Briz did not exist and that she was only equipped with tax declarations and receipts, the important consideration then is that she has been in possession of the 7,091-square meter property since 1956 through Crispulo Exconde as caretaker. Her possession was in the concept of owner. Her acts of harvesting coconuts therefrom were manifest and visible to all. She possessed the property peacefully as she was never ousted therefrom nor prevented from enjoying the fruits thereof.