However insulting to our pride this may be, the fact remains that every person is a particular, relative, dependent, fallible, finite creature. There is no such thing as the universal man or woman. Inerrancy crystallizes relative cultural, historical, and ethnic conditions into timeless, universal standards. This overriding of the human element in revelation by overemphasizing the divine element is not new. The Docetists of the Third Century denied the humanity of Christ and were declared heretics by the early church.
Biblical inerrancy is a modern docetic heresy.
I must confess, however, that I have never met an inerrantist, not even at Southeastern. I have met some who said they were inerrantists, but upon closer scrutiny, I have found that each one is a compromiser of this self-appointed title. Biblical inerrantists may exist in theory, but in reality, only prooftext inerrantists exist. This is particularly apparent in the argument against the ordination of women. Or perhaps women in inerrantist churches are required to use sign language.