Athletic scholarships pay for the education that the athelete recieves.
This 'award' should not be followed up with demands for another means of income from the school. The problem is that the athelete, by NCAA affiliated rules, is unable to participate in the work force. The main reason for this is because the university and the NCAA find this to be an overload of actvities. If, however, the student-athelete was able to work a part time job for a means of income, this would delete the need for university based funding for athelets. I say it again, scholarships are a reward all their own and should not be looked at as a secondary payment.