The reply also contained contact information for the Respondent. The Panel finds that the Policy is applicable to this dispute. In addition, the Complaint was sent by facsimile to the listed fax numbers and express courier to all available postal addresses. The Sole Panelist finds that the Panel was properly constituted and appointed in accordance with the Uniform Rules and WIPO Supplemental Rules. The Panel finds that the following facts appear from the Complaint and documents submitted with the Complaint and, except where noted, have not been disputed by that the Respondent.
Complainant is a very well known sports and fitness company.
At least some of these registrations are from as early as 1981. The Respondent argues, primarily based on the length of the names that they are distinct from Complainant s mark. Complainant also argues that Respondent has not used the Domain Name except to attempt to sell them to Complainant. In response, Respondent alleged that, prior to 1996 Respondent planned to enter the Indian Entertainment business, but because Internet was still in its infancy, Respondent s launch of a Web based business had been slow. Respondent s intentions were clearly to reach a mutually beneficial solution.