It's a defense attitude that you begin to see. You're limited in California to one expert to a side on a given issue. You've got an expert, they've got an expert. If their expert is a better showman, he's more convincing, or she's more convincing and just seems to have more confidence, the jury may very well go with that. My feeling is that if the plaintiff is sympathetic, there's an arguable case on liability and the jury wants to give them money, the jury will do that.
Defense lawyers are afraid of that.
All of us think about that. Because Vicki's a defense lawyer, I went with that attitude. I didn't try to do both sides. So, I look at this as a case heading for a defense verdict. But that's not how the defense lawyers are looking at it.