This appeal followed. The juvenile court has broad authority in determining whether a juvenile should be certified for trial as an adult. Such a determination will not be reversed unless the juvenile court s findings are so erroneous as to constitute an abuse of discretion. There is no dispute that J.L.L. was subject to presumptive certification. Once the presumption is established, it may only be overcome if the juvenile produces clear and convincing evidence that retaining the proceeding in juvenile court serves the public safety.
Courts are to give greater weight to the first and third factors than to the other factors listed.
Id. Seriousness of Offense J.L.L. suggests that the juvenile court did not have a valid basis for concluding that the alleged offense was serious. Additionally, there are several aggravating factors that apply to this case. The victim was only 14 years old. Finally, there was evidence that the impact on the victim was significant. In fact, the only reason this case was reported is because A.E. sought counseling for her post-assault depression and suicidal tendencies.