He is currently affiliated with the Science and Environment Policy Project in Fairfax, Virginia and is a research associate with the Environmental Sciences Laboratory, Brooklyn College, Brooklyn, New York. The role of science is not only to discover new facts and phenomena, but to uncover errors appearing in previous investigations. But this is not what happens in politically correct science. Once a political policy initiative has been introduced, sometimes but not always based on scientific investigation, the initiative persists even when new studies indicate that the premise on which the policy was based is incorrect. My own experience is with asbestos and acid rain and how they relate to human health, both of which subjects I worked on as a U.S. government scientist.
Acid rain is another example.
The Clinton administration is actively pursuing policies aimed at curbing global warming. Yes it is. The idea that humans have significantly enhanced global warming is by far the most massive abuse of science that I ever have seen. The prediction of disastrous global warming is used to justify a policy of centralized control of the world's energy resources. Radical environmentalists believe that if the industrial nations do not reverse their economic growth they will destroy the Earth.