They are particularly vital to the many single parents who are the sole breadwinners in their families. Thus, we need not question the wisdom of providing wellsupervised centers for children whose mothers and fathers require assistance in raising them. That debate is over. There are at least four reasons that is true. Second, you can't pay an employee in a child-care center enough to care for children like their own mothers will do.
Children are a mother's passion, and it shows.
Third, research verifies that kids at home are healthier than those who are regularly exposed to diseases, coughs, and sneezes from other boys and girls. 47 Fourth, a bonding is more likely to occur between parents and children when the developmental milestones are experienced firsthand. Families should be there when the first step is taken and the first word is spoken and when fears and anxieties arise. Certainly, others can substitute for Mom in those special moments, but something precious is lost if a surrogate witnesses them. In short, I recognize the need for healthy child-care facilities in situations that demand them, but group living is not in the best interests of kids.