I guess my biggest concern is your fixation with the aesthetic qualities of a piece of literature. You continue to separate literature based on traditional judgements. That is ridiculous. There is no reason that the existing canon can be expanded. But with your solution, we are still in the same place, we have just been given our own little canon, still reinforcing the idea that their is such a thing as objectively judged literature.
Aesthetics ARE subjective.
Judgement IS subjective. Based on the postmodernist viewpoint, which I think you fail to grasp in it's entirety, it is not possible to come to ONE absolute judgement regarding a work of art, it is all a matter of perspective. I think that if anything, technology is helping to take off the blinders regarding literary approaches. In no way do I see technology hindering the post modern movement, but instead furthering it by providing many perspectives and making those perspectives available to those who have been brought up on traditional assumptions. Let me remind you that without women, those in the ivory tower would never have been born and without african american slavery, many of those ivory towers would never have been built.