This is a systematic method of compiling, categorizing and capturing the full range of issues and concerns regarding this project and the future of the Sierra Nevada as reflected in public input. Information from formal public hearings, written comment, workshop proceedings and other sources are all included in the analysis. Not everyone wants to participate in a project like this, but the Content Analysis process ensures that those who do are heard.
All input is considered and reviewed, in most cases by two analysts.
Comments, sorted by issues and themes, are then entered verbatim into a database. In preparing the final summary, public statements are reviewed again using database printouts. Content Analysis is not intended to replace reading actual input and comments. Rather, it serves to augment input. In no way do the results of the content analysis attempt to sway decision makers towards the will of the majority.