It is all from a finite resource that will eventually run out. Basically shifting the barge subsidy to a much smaller subsidy will save rate payer money and make the economic effects invisible to those that ship the Lower Snake corridor. The barging is no different that the public highway system, everyone benefits one way or another. And you share the benefits where you want to recognize it or not. Hydropower is a renewable resource.
Conservation is a cost effective replacement.
I just do not see why barging is so important when a rail line already exists and operates that can provide the same service at the same price without necessity of four Lower Snake dams. Yes through the hydrologic cycle, and as a benefit to everyone by providing the reservoir to pump and irrigate from which through plant transpiration cleans carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide out of the air as well as other pollution. I agree - it is a great solution. We haven't finalized our list of parties. That brings us to Irrigation.