Complainant claims that Agency later rang and advised because of her RSI and that she wore glasses she no longer had the position. Complainant claims disability discrimination. Complainant claims she could fulfill the inherent requirements of the position and noted that she usually wore glasses for computer work. Complainant has hearing implairment, and required an auslan interpreter but respondent said don't need one because complainant can speak. Complainant had difficulty in the interview and couldn't hear all that was asked of him.
Complainant claims discrimination on the basis of disability.
Complainant is employed as a teacher at respondent school. Complainant was employed as a school bus driver. Complainant says employer said he had a relief driver who could cover for the period when was off work but then terminated her employment. Complainant alleges this was because of her disability. Complainant advised by supervisor that he was not to have a morning smoko and was to eat and drink while in the truck while someone opens and shuts a gate.