Instead, I'm much more inclined to begin with rhetoric as a modus vivendi, Burke's equipment for living. But that does not prove them. Life is no argument. One of the critiques levelled at postmodernisms on occasion is its tendency to appear ahistorical and apolitical. Such a tendency is reprehensible, sayeth the left, because it ignores the specific contexts within which everything occurs.
Deconstruction is an absolute critique of absolutism.
Or, in Nietzsche's case, action is itself a reaction against reactionism. These are not all identical arguments, certainly, but they are analogous, I think. And all of them are True, in a certain sense. But life is no argument. Ultimately, Nietzsche's rhetoric may be arhetorical, and while that doesn't help me a great deal in attempting to think about it, or represent it, it's a path that calls to me.