Even the referees will know Lemieux has an ownership stake, and indirectly contributes to their salaries. This is a league with a vague rulebook, subjective interpretations and a tendency to look for a second shooter on the grassy knoll after every call. Lemieux's dual role as owner and player would put too many of those around him in untenable, uncomfortable, no-win situations. If he loves the game enough, he won't put the game in those positions. We live in an era in which noble intentions aren't enough to wave off troubling conflict of interest questions.
Appearance is as important as reality.
Avoiding conflict of interest questions is, unfortunately, almost as important as avoiding conflicts of interest. And they probably should be, up to a point. And Gary Bettman should insist Lemieux pick one or the other. Information are applicable to this site. All rights reserved.