I wonder why some creationists object to the label evolutionary creationist. This would seem to have Phil's blessing. It is common for words to take on different meanings in different contexts. For example, the word plastic is itself very plastic. In my own field it can mean a man-made polymer or a permanent strain depending on context.
Creation is another word that takes on many different meanings.
It seems to me that this supports my position rather than yours. Dobzhansky is pointing out that there are different types of evolution. He is carefully pointing out that he is discussing biological evolution. Well, I don't know Stephen, Yockey says that he is a Darwinist. Here again I think we have a problem with popularizations.