The skill of the discussion steerer, the negotiations of the leaders, the inputs of stakeholders - these things decide issues. Robert's works exactly to the extent that it enables consensus. In the modern age all bodies are on the way to becoming voluntary bodies. There are coalitions of minorities, and even of individuals. Robert's exists for the health of the body itself, not for the making of a given decision.
Cleanliness is a problem in decision-making.
Points of order aren't about the procedure, they are about substantive points on the issue or substantive points on the rights of those affected. They are opportunities for interjection and delay. Tools of consensus-building. Who gets to speak is a way of shaping the debate. This is for the leaders of the body not for a date-time stamp.