One such unexamined 'wisdom' is the Cartesian divide between 'subject' and 'object', 'inner' and 'outer'. The result is a complete muddle in dichotomizing 'experience' and 'science' along the lines of 'inner' and 'outer'. Math is referred to as 'science of inner experience'. Then we are told about the virtue of math as a language of abstractions.
Abstraction is by nature experience distant.
Upon closer examination, it seems that the 'inner experience' has little to do with experiencing. This transformation is the 'birthing' process where we move from the many to the one and in doing so experience a 'new beginning' and so a different level of understanding, but we need to be wary in that these transformations can be based on illusions. If we reduce the word 'Science' to a behavioural description then it is the process of establishing identifications through the analysis of the patterns that lead-up to the identifications. By understanding the patterns so we can predict identifications and so find solutions to problems. All meaning, whether derived scientifically or through acts of 'god', is 'in here'.