Staunch opponents of U.S. engagement assert that our relations with China are driven primarily, if not exclusively, by profit-seeking and commercial gain. They assert that we are blind to human rights, to China's growing military force, to its quest for regional dominance and ultimately to our national security interests. They say we appease China because of our commercial interests. I'm familiar with these arguments. We've heard similar points of views leveled against our legislative efforts for overall reform of our economic sanctions policy.
American business is pro-engagement.
If China's stake in the global economy is enhanced through trade, foreign investment, and membership in the WTO, it is more likely that its behavior will be more responsible. It is important to the global economy and stability of other countries that our economy is healthy and growing. Opening markets abroad is a national security matter. So, too, is the active promotion of human rights and democracy. Both can and should coexist in American foreign policy.