The report documents this very effect. The hypothetical situation that he proposes in the first paragraph already sets up the huge flaw in his argument. If you know anything about the design argument and the history of its refutations, you would be able to see that it is in no way a scientific, empirical inference. While a biology professor may believe it to be true, based on some other kind of inference that is not scientific, this professor has an ethical obligation not to mention it in a class that is dedicated to pure, objective and unbiased science. No one is imposing on this professor's right to political incorrectness, just placing his views into the proper context in which they should be expressed.
All opinions DO get consideration.
The proper place is in the public sphere and outside of a classroom designated for a particular subject. Someone is certainly going to object if you talk about your opinions on chemistry in an English class. All contents of this site are 1998-99 by the New University Newspaper. Reproduction in any way is prohibited unless express written consent is first obtained.