Not until after World War II did the status of women in the military approach equity. But I would still insist that no eighteenth century army could have functioned without them. I would also insist that despite the contempt with which camp followers were viewed by their contemporaries, it is appropriate for historians to treat them with respect. They become more pervasive the further back one goes. Uniform procurement remained decentralized well into the nineteenth century.
Camp followers are just one more unofficial service.
It might be useful to compare comments on the followers, the horse-traders, the teamsters, etc. to get a better sense of relations on a comparative basis. I am seeking information on women who actually joined the ranks in the American Revolution as well as the camp followers. Any info would be greatly appreciated. In reply to Leslie Liedel's query about women's Revolutionary War experience, the following may be helpful. Published for the Institute of Early American History and Culture by the University of North Carolina Press, 1980.