Document ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2003-0003-0005
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2003-03-12T05:00Z

Appendix
A
Literature
Search
Regarding
Detection
and
Quantitation
Limit
Approaches
Introduction
Beginning
in
2001,
DynCorp
staff
conducted
a
search
of
published
literature
to
identify
articles
that
discuss
detection
and
quantitation
limit
approaches.
This
literature
search
effort
was
conducted
under
EPA
Contract
No.
68­
C­
01­
091
to
support
an
evaluation
of
detection
and
quantitation
limit
approaches
by
the
EPA
Office
of
Water.

The
principal
goal
of
this
literature
search
effort
was
to
determine
if
any
new
detection
or
quantitation
limit
approaches
had
been
published
in
the
literature
since
an
earlier
search
conducted
for
EPA
by
Science
Applications
International
Corporation
(
SAIC)
in
1997
and
1998.
That
search
resulted
in
an
annotated
bibliography
developed
by
SAIC
and
delivered
to
EPA
in
1998.

In
August
2002,
EPA
included
the
literature
search
results
in
a
draft
Technical
Support
Document
(
TSD)
that
was
submitted
for
formal
peer
review.
As
part
of
the
charge
to
the
peer
reviewers,
EPA
asked
them
to
identify
any
additional
references.
Following
EPA's
review
of
the
suggested
additional
references,
DynCorp
included
those
relevant
to
the
TSD
in
the
literature
search
results
summarized
in
Attachment
1.

How
the
search
was
conducted
This
search
was
conducted
using
two
major
techniques:

 
a
search
of
an
on­
line
citation
index
(
an
index
of
articles
cited
by
other
authors),
and
 
a
general
on­
line
search
of
literature.

On­
line
citation
index
search
Because
the
search
was
intended
to
identify
detection
and
quantitation
limit
approaches
and
not
specific
numeric
limits
associated
with
a
particular
analytical
method,
DynCorp
began
by
searching
for
references
to
the
major
approaches
known
to
EPA.
These
included
the
Agency s
method
detection
limit
(
MDL)
and
any
other
terms
that
have
been
suggested
to
the
Agency
as
alternative
detection
or
quantitation
limit
approaches.
In
addition
to
searching
for
these
approaches,
DynCorp
also
searched
the
citation
index
to
identify
references
to
the
original
authors
of
these
approaches
and
for
any
other
authors
who
either
cited
the
original
approaches,
the
original
papers
underlying
those
approaches,
or
the
authors
of
those
approaches.
DynCorp
used
a
similar
approach
to
find
any
papers
that
cited
the
references
identified
in
the
earlier
literature
search
by
SAIC.

DynCorp
staff
evaluated
the
full
title
of
each
identified
citation
to
determine
its
relevance
to
EPA s
objective.
Where
available
electronically
and
at
no
additional
cost,
DynCorp
staff
also
reviewed
the
abstract
and/
or
full
paper
to
further
characterize
relevance.
All
papers
that
were
determined
to
be
relevant,
or
even
possibly
relevant,
were
obtained
in
hardcopy
or
electronic
format
for
evaluation
by
EPA.

After
reviewing
all
papers
determined
to
be
relevant
to
EPA s
objective,
DynCorp
examined
all
of
the
references
cited
in
those
papers
to
identify
additional
papers
of
interest.
These,
too,
were
obtained
in
hardcopy
or
electronic
format
for
evaluation
by
EPA,
except
where
noted
below.

February
2003
A­
1
Assessment
of
Detection
and
Quantitation
Approaches
General
on­
line
literature
search
DynCorp
performed
an
on­
line
direct
search
of
published
literature
(
e.
g.,
a
literature
database
of
published
articles,
not
a
citation
index)
using
general
terms
such
as
"
detection
limit,"
"
quantitation
limit,"
or
"
calibration."
As
expected,
this
approach
returned
a
very
large
numbers
of
papers
that
mention
these
terms,
even
if
the
focus
of
the
paper
was
on
something
far
removed
from
the
development
or
assessment
of
approaches
about
detection
and
quantitation,
and
proved
to
be
of
limited
value
in
serving
EPA s
objectives
for
the
search.
Therefore,
DynCorp
discontinued
this
effort
and
narrowed
our
on­
line
literature
search
to
a
search
for
additional,
uncited
works
by
authors
of
the
approaches
known
to
EPA
or
identified
through
the
citation
index
approach.

Papers
determined
to
be
relevant
to
EPA s
objective
were
obtained
in
electronic
or
hardcopy
format
for
evaluation
by
EPA,
except
where
noted
below.

How
the
results
are
presented
DynCorp
identified
a
total
of
161
relevant
publications
using
the
approach
described
above.
Thirty­
three
(
33)
of
these
publications
were
also
identified
in
the
earlier
search
by
SAIC.
Of
the
128
remaining
publications,
35
were
published
since
the
SAIC
search
was
completed.

The
peer
reviewers
suggested
additional
publications
covering
a
variety
of
topics,
including:
quality
control,
analysis
of
mercury,
and
approaches
to
dealing
with
censored
data.
EPA
reviewed
the
citations
from
the
peer
reviewers
and
determined
that
20
directly
addressed
detection
or
quantitation
approaches.
In
particular,
EPA
noted
that
the
issue
of
censored
data
applies
regardless
of
the
specific
detection
or
quantitation
limit
associated
with
the
data,
so
those
citations
dealing
with
censored
data
were
not
included.

Each
of
the
181
publications
identified
in
the
search
is
listed
in
Attachment
1,
which
provides
the
title,
year
of
publication,
authors,
and
source
citation.
The
citations
for
the
33
papers
identified
in
the
earlier
search
by
SAIC
are
included
in
the
attachment,
and
can
be
identified
by
the
phrase
"
annotated
only"
in
parentheses
after
the
title
of
the
paper.

The
final
column
of
the
attached
spreadsheet
is
labeled
"
Category."
All
of
the
citations
identified
in
the
SAIC
literature
search
and
the
current
search
conducted
by
DynCorp
were
placed
in
one
of
the
six
following
categories,
based
on
the
principal
characteristic
of
the
article:

 
Background
­
The
citation
discusses
background
information
(
including
early
works
by
Currie,
Kaiser,
and
others).
 
Calibration
concept
­
The
citation
primarily
deals
with
calibration
of
analytical
instrumentation
 
Critique
­
The
major
thrust
of
the
citation
is
to
critique
one
or
more
approaches,
as
opposed
to
introducing
a
new
approach
 
Multi­
laboratory
approach
­
The
citation
describes
an
approach
to
developing
detection
and/
or
quantitation
limits
that
relies
on
multi­
laboratory
measurements
 
Single­
laboratory
approach
­
The
citation
describes
an
approach
to
developing
detection
and/
or
quantitation
limits
that
relies
on
single­
laboratory
measurements
 
Single­
laboratory,
multi­
level
approach
­
The
citation
describes
an
approach
to
developing
detection
and/
or
quantitation
limits
that
relies
on
single­
laboratory
measurements
but
explicitly
includes
multiple
concentrations.

A­
2
February
2003
Appendix
A
Although
there
is
some
degree
of
overlap
between
categories,
and
some
papers
could
probably
be
classified
in
more
than
one
category,
each
citation
was
classified
into
only
one
category
for
the
purposes
of
this
search.

A
seventh
category
called
"
Not
found"
was
used
for
three
papers
that
were
identified
in
the
literature
search,
but
copies
of
which
could
not
readily
be
obtained.
One
paper
is
from
a
German
journal
that
was
not
available
via
interlibrary
loan.
A
second
article
was
also
not
available
via
interlibrary
loan.
The
third
citation
is
an
abstract
by
Currie,
from
1983.
Given
that
the
work
of
Currie
is
well­
represented
in
the
other
citations
and
the
fact
that
this
citation
appears
to
be
only
an
abstract,
additional
efforts
were
not
expended
to
obtain
a
copy.

The
20
publications
suggested
by
the
peer
reviewers
were
all
included
at
the
end
of
the
list,
under
an
eighth
category
called
"
Suggested
by
a
peer
reviewer."

The
references
presented
in
the
table
were
sorted
by
category
and
year
of
publication
and
are
displayed
with
the
most
recent
citations
in
each
category
first.

Summary
The
principal
goal
of
this
literature
search
effort
was
to
determine
if
any
new
detection
or
quantitation
limit
approaches
had
been
published
in
the
literature
since
the
search
by
SAIC
in
1997
­
1998.
As
anticipated,
citations
were
identified
that
relate
to
the
recent
efforts
of
the
International
Organization
for
Standardization
(
ISO),
the
International
Union
of
Pure
and
Applied
Chemists
(
IUPAC),
and
the
ASTM
International.
Additional
articles
critiquing
various
approaches
were
identified
as
well.

However,
no
previously
unknown
detection
or
quantitation
limit
approaches
were
uncovered
as
a
result
of
this
effort.

Likewise,
the
references
suggested
by
the
peer
reviewers
provided
additional
details
and
applications
of
existing
detection
and
quantitation
approaches,
but
did
not
suggest
any
approaches
that
had
not
already
been
identified.

February
2003
A­
3
Results
of
the
2001
Literature
Search
Title
Year
Author
Source
Category
L.
A.
Currie
Fresenius
Journal
of
Analytical
Chemistry
370:
705­
718
BackgroundSome
Case
Studies
of
Skewed
(
and
other
ab­
normal)
Data
Distributions
Arising
2001
in
Low­
Level
Environmental
Research
Legislative
Limits
Below
Detection
Capability
2000
S.
L.
R.
Ellison,
V.
J.
Barwick,
A.
Williams
Accreditation
Quality
Assurance
5:
308­
313
Background
International
Recommendations
Offered
on
Analytical
Detection
and
Quantification
Concepts
and
Nomenclature
1999
L.
A.
Currie
Analytica
Chimica
Acta
391:
103
Background
Detection
and
Quantitation
Limits:
Origins
and
Historical
Overview
1999
L.
A.
Currie
Analytica
Chimica
Acta
391:
127­
134
Background
1996
ASMS
Fall
Workshop:
Limits
to
Confirmation,
Quantitation,
and
Detection
1997
R.
Baldwin,
R.
A.
Bethem,
R.
K.
Boyd,
W.
L.

Budde,
T.
Cairns,
R.
D.
Gibbons,
J.
D.

Henion,
M.
A.
Kaiser,
Journal
of
the
American
Society
for
Mass
Spectrometry
8:

1180­
1190
Background
Measurement
precision
and
1/
f
Noise
in
Analytical
Instruments
1996
Y.
Hayashi,
R.
Matsuda,
R.
B.
Poe
Journal
of
Chromatography
A
722:
157­
167
Background
Fossil­
and
Bio­
mass
Combustion:
C­
14
for
Source
Identification,
Chemical
Tracer
Development,
and
Model
Validation
1994
L.
A.
Currie,
G.
A.
Klouda,
D.
B.
Klinedinst,

A.
E.
Sheffield,
A.
J.
T.
Jull,
D.
J.
Donahue,

M.
V.
Connolly
Nuclear
Instr.
And
Methods
in
Physics
Res.
B
92:
404­
409
Background
Interlaboratory
Comparison
of
Instruments
Used
for
the
Determination
of
Elements
in
Acid
Digestates
of
Solids
1994
D.
E.
Kimbrough,
J.
Wakakuwa
Analyst
119:
383­
388
Background
Throwaway
Data
1994
L.
H.
Keith
Environmental
Science
&
Technology
28:
389A­
390A
Background
EPA's
Office
of
Water
Surges
Toward
MDL
Solution
1994
Larry
Keith
Radian
Background
In
Pursuit
of
Accuracy:
Nomenclature,
Assumptions,
and
Standards
1992
L.
A.
Currie
Pure
&
Applied
Chemistry
64:
455­
472
Background
Interlaboratory
Aspects
of
Detection
Limits
Used
for
Regulatory
and
Control
1988
L.
B.
Rogers
ACS
Symposium
Series
361:
94­
108
Background
Purposes
Noise
and
Detection
Limits
in
Signal­
Integrating
Analytical
Methods
1988
Effects
of
Analytical
Calibration
Models
on
Detection
Limit
Estimates
1988
H.
C.
Smit,
H.
Steigstra
ACS
Symposium
Series
361:
126­
148
Background
K.
G.
Owens,
C.
F.
Bauer,
C.
L.
Grantr
ACS
Symposium
Series
361:
194­
207
Background
Real­
World
Limitations
to
Detection
1988
D.
Kurtz,
J.
Taylor,
L.
Sturdivan,
W.

Crummett,
C.
Midkiff,
R.
Watters
Jr,
L.

Wood,
W.
Hanneman,
W.
Horwitz
ACS
Symposium
Series
361:
288­
316
Background
Detection
Limits
­
A
Systematic
Approach
to
Detection
Limits
is
Needed
When
Trace
Determinations
are
to
be
Performed
1986
S.
A.
Borman
Analytical
Chemistry
58:
A986
Background
Chemometrics
and
Analytical
Chemistry
1984
L.
A.
Currie
Chemometrics
56:
115­
146
Background
Quality
Control
in
Water
Analyses
1983
C.
Kirchmer
ES&
T
17:
174A­
181A
Background
Validation
of
Analytical
Methods
1983
J.
K.
Taylor
Analytical
Chemistry
55:
600A­
602A,
608A
Background
Trace
Analyses
for
Wastewaters
­
Author's
response
1982
D.
Foerst
Envir.
Sci.
&
Tech.
16:
430A
­
431A
Background
A­
4
A­
5
Title
Year
Author
Source
Category
Zur
Theorie
der
Eichfunktion
bei
der
spektrochemischen
Analyse
1982
V.
H.
Kaiser
DK
535:
309­
319
Background
The
Reliability
of
Detection
Limits
in
Analytical
Chemistry
1980
J.
D.
Winefordner,
J.
L.
Ward
Analytical
Letters
13:
1293­
1297
Background
A
Review
and
Tutorial
Discussion
of
Noise
and
Signal­
to­
Noise
Ratios
in
Analytical
Spectrometry
­
I.
Fundamental
Principles
of
Signal­
to­
Noise
Ratios
1978
C.
T.
J.
Alkemade,
W.
Snelleman,
G.
D.

Boutilier,
B.
D.
Pollard,
J.
D.
Winefordner,

T.
L.
Chester,
N.
Omenetto
Spectrochimica
Acta
33B:
383­
399
Background
A
Review
and
Tutorial
Discussion
of
Noise
and
Sign­
to­
Noise
Ratios
in
Analytical
Spectrometry
­
II.
Fundamental
Principles
of
Signal­
to­
Noise
Ratios
1978
G.
D.
Boutilier,
B.
D.
Pollard,
J.
D.

Winefordner,
T.
L.
Chester,
N.
Omenetto
Spectrochimica
Acta
33B:
401­
415
Background
A
Tutorial
Review
of
Some
Elementary
Concepts
in
the
Statistical
Evaluation
of
Trace
Element
Measurements
1978
P.
W.
J.
M.
Boumans
Spectrochimica
Acta
33B:
625­
634
Background
Analysis
of
Lead
in
Polluted
Coastal
Seawater
1976
C.
Patterson,
D.
Settle,
B.
Glover
Marine
Chemistry
4:
305­
319
Background
Multielement
Analysis
with
an
Inductively
Coupled
Plasma/
Optical
Emission
System
1976
R.
M.
Ajhar,
P.
D.
Dalager,
A.
L.
Davison
American
Laboratory
72­
78
Background
Interlaboratory
Lead
Analyses
of
Standardized
Samples
of
Seawater
1974
P.
Brewer,
N.
Frew,
N.
Cutshall,
J.
J.

Wagner,
R.
A.
Duce,
P.
R.
Walsh,
G.
L.

Hoffman,
J.
W.
R.
Dutton,
W.
F.
Fitzgerald
Marine
Chemistry
2:
69­
84
Background
Statistical
and
Mathematical
Methods
in
Analytical
Chemistry
1972
L.
A.
Currie,
J.
J.
Filliben,
J.
R.
DeVoe
Anal.
Chem.
44:
497R­
512R
Background
Studies
of
Flame
and
Plasma
Torch
Emission
for
Simultaneous
Multi­
Element
Analysis­
I.
Preliminary
Investigations
1972
P.
W.
J.
M.
Boumans,
F.
J.
De
Boer
Spectrochimica
Acta
27B:
391­
414
Background
Quantitative
Determination:
Application
to
Radiochemistry
1968
Lloyd
Currie
Anal.
Chem.
40:
586­
593
Background
Qualitative
and
Quantitative
Sensitivity
in
Flame
Photometry
1966
J.
Ramirez­
Munoz
Talanta
13:
87­
101
Background
The
Limit
of
Detection
of
Analytical
Methods
1962
J.
B.
Roos
Analyst
87:
832­
833
Background
A
Careful
Consideration
of
the
Calibration
Concept
2001
S.
D.
Phillips,
W.
T.
Estler,
T.
Doiron,
K.
R.

Eberhardt,
M.
S.
Levenson
Journal
of
Research
of
the
National
Institute
of
Standards
and
Technology
106:
371­
379
Calibration
Weighted
Random­
Effects
Regression
Models
with
Application
to
Interlaboratory
Calibration
2001
R.
D.
Gibbons,
D.
K.
Bhaumik
Technometrics
43:
192­
198
Calibration
Guidelines
for
Calibration
in
Analytical
Chemistry­
Part
I.
and
Single
Component
Calibration
(
IUPAC
recommendations
1998)
1998
K.
Danzer,
L.
A.
Currie
Pure
and
Applied
Chemistry
70:
993­
1014
Calibration
A
Comparison
of
Uncertainty
Criteria
for
Calibration
1996
R.
W.
Mee,
K.
R.
Eberhardt
Technometrics
38:
221­
229
Calibration
Constant­
Width
Calibration
Intervals
for
Linear
Regression
1994
K.
R.
Eberhardt,
R.
W.
Mee
Journal
of
Quality
Technology
26:
21­
29
Calibration
Regression
and
Calibration
with
Nonconstant
Error
Variance
1990
M.
Davidian,
P.
D.
Haaland
Chemometrics
and
Intelligent
Laboratory
Systems
9:
231­

248
Calibration
Calibration
with
Randomly
Changing
Standard
Curves
1989
D.
F.
Vecchia,
H.
K.
Iyer,
P.
L.
Chapman
Technometrics
31:
83­
90
Calibration
Fundamentals
A­
6
Title
Year
Author
Source
Category
Linear
Calibration
When
the
Coefficient
of
Variation
is
Constant
1988
Y.
C.
Yao,
D.
F.
Vecchia,
H.
K.
Iyer
Probability
and
Statistics:
Essays
in
Honor
of
Franklin
A.

Graybill,
297­
309
Calibration
Analytical
Method
Comparisons
by
Estimates
of
Precision
and
Lower
Detection
Limit
1986
D.
M.
Holland,
F.
F.
McElroy
Environmental
Science
&
Technology
20:
1157­
1161
Calibration
Design
Considerations
for
Calibration
1986
J.
P.
Buonaccorsi
Technometrics
28:
149­
155
Calibration
Multivariate
Calibration
when
the
Error
Covariance
Matrix
is
Structured
1985
T.
Naes
Technometrics
27:
301­
311
Calibration
An
Implementation
of
the
Scheffé
Approach
to
Calibration
Using
Spline
Functions,
Illustrated
by
a
Pressure­
Volume
Calibration
1982
J.
A.
Lechner,
C.
P.
Reeve,
C.
H.

Spiegelman
Technometrics
24:
229­
234
Calibration
Measuring
and
Maximizing
Precision
in
Analyses
Based
on
Use
of
Calibration
Graphs
1982
D.
G.
Mitchell,
J.
S.
Garden
Talanta
29:
921­
929
Calibration
Calibration
in
Quantitative
Analysis:
Part2.
Confidence
Regions
for
the
Sample
Content
in
the
Case
of
Linear
Calibration
Relations
1981
J.
Agterdenbos,
F.
J.
M.
J.
Maessen,
J.

Balke
Analytica
Chimica
Acta
132:
127­
137
Calibration
Design
Aspects
of
Scheffe s
Calibration
Theory
using
Linear
Splines
1980
C.
H.
Spiegelman,
W.
J.
Studden
Journal
of
Research
of
the
National
Bureau
of
Standards
85:

295­
304
Calibration
Nonconstant
Variance
Regression
Techniques
for
Calibration­
Curve­
Based
Analysis
1980
J.
S.
Garden,
D.
G.
Mitchell,
W.
N.
Mills
Anal.
Chem.
52:
2310­
2315
Calibration
Calibration
in
Quantitative
Analysis
1979
J.
Agterdenbos
Analytica
Chimica
Acta
108:
315­
323
Calibration
Calibration
Curves
with
Nonuniform
Variance
1979
L.
Schwartz
Analytical
Chem.
51:
723­
727
Calibration
Elimination
of
the
Bias
in
the
Course
of
Calibration
1978
L.
J.
Naszódi
Technometrics
20:
201­
205
Calibration
Optimal
Designs
for
the
Inverse
Regression
Method
of
Calibration
1973
M.
A.
Thomas,
R.
H.
Myers
Communications
in
Statistics
2:
419­
433
Calibration
A
Statistical
Theory
of
Calibration
1973
H.
Scheffé
The
Annals
of
Statistics
1:
1­
37
Calibration
On
the
Problem
of
Calibration
1972
G.
K.
Shukla
Technometrics
14:
547­
553
Calibration
Statistical
Processing
of
Calibration
Data
in
Quantitative
Analysis
by
Gas
Chromatography
1970
P.
Bocek,
J.
Novak
J.
Chromatog.
51:
375­
383
Calibration
Estimation
of
a
Linear
Function
for
a
Calibration
Line:
Consideration
of
a
Recent
Proposal
1969
J.
Berkson
Technometrics
11:
649­
660
Calibration
A
Note
on
Regression
Methods
in
Calibration
1969
E.
J.
Williams
Technometrics
11:
189­
192
Calibration
Classical
and
Inverse
Regression
Methods
of
Calibration
in
Extrapolation
1969
R.
G.
Krutchkoff
Technometrics
11:
605­
608
Calibration
Optimal
Experimental
Designs
for
Estimating
the
Independent
Variable
in
Regression
1968
R.
L.
Ott,
R.
H.
Myers
Technometrics
10:
811­
823
Calibration
Classical
and
Inverse
Regression
Methods
of
Calibration
1967
R.
G.
Krutchkoff
Technometrics
9:
425­
439
Calibration
The
Interpretation
of
Certain
Regression
Methods
and
their
Use
in
Biological
and
Industrial
Research
1939
C.
Eisenhart
The
Annals
of
Mathematical
Statistics
10:
162­
186
Calibration
Title
Year
Author
Source
Category
Ann
Rosecrance
Env.
Testing
&
Anal.
9:
13,50
CritiqueThe
Three
"
Rs"
for
Relevant
Detection,
Reliable
Quantitation
and
Respectable
2000
Reporting
Limits
Detection
and
Quantification
Capabilities
and
the
Evaluation
of
Low­
Level
Data:
2000
Some
International
Perspectives
and
Continuing
Challenges
L.
A.
Currie
Journal
of
Radioanalytical
and
Nuclear
Chemistry
245:
145­

156
Critique
Realistic
Detection
Limits
from
Confidence
Bands
1999
J.
R.
Burdge,
D.
L.
McTaggart,
S.
O.
Farwell
Journal
of
Chemical
Education
76:
434­
439
Critique
Response
to
Comment
of
"
An
Alternative
Minimum
Level
Definition
for
Analytical
Quantification"
1999
Henry
Kahn,
William
Telliard,
Chuck
White
Env.
Sci.
&
Tech.
33:
1315
Critique
Comment
on
"
An
Alternative
Minimum
Level
Definition
for
Analytical
Quantification"
1999
H.
G.
Rigo
Env.
Sci
&
Tech.
33:
1311­
1312
Critique
Response
to
Comment
on
"
An
Alternative
Minimum
Level
Definition
for
Analytical
Quantification"
1999
Robert
Gibbons,
David
Coleman,
Ray
Maddalone
Env.
Sci.
&
Tech.
33:
1313­
1314
Critique
Comment
on
"
An
Alternative
Minimum
Level
Definition
for
Analytical
Quantification"
1998
Henry
Kahn,
William
Telliard,
Chuck
White
Envir.
Sci
&
Tech
32:
2346­
2348
Critique
Response
to
Comment
on
"
An
Alternative
Minimum
Level
Definition
for
Analytical
Quantification"
1998
Robert
Gibbons,
David
Coleman,
Ray
Maddalone
Envir.
Sci
&
Tech
32:
2349­
2353
Critique
A
Discussion
of
Issues
Raised
by
Lloyd
Currie
and
a
Cross
Disciplinary
View
of
Detection
Limits
and
Estimating
Parameters
that
are
Often
At
or
Near
Zero
1997
C.
H.
Spiegelman
Chemometrics
and
Intelligent
Laboratory
Systems
37:
183­

188
Critique
A
Mock
Trial
for
Critical
Values
(
Detection
Limits)
1997
C.
H.
Spiegelman,
P.
Tarlow
STATS:
The
Magazine
for
Students
of
Statistics
20:
13­
16
Critique
Comment
on
"
An
Alternative
Minimum
Level
Definition
for
Analytical
Quantification"
1997
David
Kimbrough
Envir.
Sci.
&
Tech.
31:
3727­
3728
Critique
The
Smallest
Concentration
1997
R.
F.
Moran,
E.
N.
Brown
Clinical
Chemistry
43:
856­
857
Critique
A
Statistical
Overview
of
Standard
(
IUPAC
and
ACS)
and
New
Procedures
for
Determining
the
Limits
of
Detection
and
Quantification:
ation
to
Voltammetric
and
Stripping
Techniques
(
Technical
Report)
1997
J.
Mocak,
A.
M.
Bond,
S.
Meitchell,
G.

Scollary
Pure
and
Applied
Chemistry
69:
297­
328
Critique
Applic
Response
to
Comment
on
"
An
Alternative
Minimum
Level
Definition
for
1997
R.
D.
Gibbons,
D.
E.
Coleman,
R.
F.

Maddalone
Envir.
Sci.
&
Tech
31:
3729­
3731
Critique
Analytical
Quantification"

Some
Conceptual
and
Statistical
Issues
in
Analysis
of
Groundwater
Monitoring
1996
Data
R.
D.
Gibbons
Environmetrics
7:
185­
199
Critique
Robert
Gibbons
Environ.
&
Ecol.
Statistics
2:
125­
167
CritiqueSome
Statistical
and
Conceptual
Issues
in
the
Detection
of
Low
Level
1995
Environmental
Pollutants
Comment
on
"
Method
Detection
Limits
in
Solid
Waste
Analysis"
1995
Comment
on
"
Method
Detection
Limits
in
Solid
Waste
Analysis"
1995
D.
E.
Coleman
Environmental
Science
&
Technology
29:
279­
280
Critique
Janice
Wakakuwa,
David
Kimbrough
Envir.
Sci.
&
Tech.
29:
281­
282
Critique
"
You
Can't
Compute
With
Less­
Thans"
1994
Ken
Osborn,
Ann
Rosecrance
East
Bay
Municipal
Utility
District,
Core
Laboratories
Critique
Limits
of
Detection
1994
N.
Cressie
Chemometrics
Intelligent
Laboratory
Systems
22:
161­
163
Critique
A­
7
Title
Year
Author
Source
Category
Conflicting
Perspectives
About
Detection
Limits
and
About
the
Censoring
of
Environmental
Data
1994
M.
J.
R.
Clark,
P.
H.
Whitfield
Water
Resources
Bulletin
30:
1063­
1079
Critique
Limit
of
Discrimination,
Limit
of
Detection
and
Sensitivity
in
Analytical
Systems
1994
R.
Ferrus,
M.
R.
Egea
Analytica
Chimica
Acta
287:
119­
145
Critique
Discussion
of:
A
Study
of
the
Precision
of
Lead
Measurements
at
Concentrations
Near
the
Method
Limit
of
Detection
1994
B.
R.
Nott,
R.
R.
Maddalone
Water
Environment
Research
66:
853­
854
Critique
Limits
of
Detection
Methodologies
1993
J.
Lindstedt
Plating
and
Surface
Finishing
80:
81­
86
Critique
Method
Detection
Limits
in
Solid
Waste
Analysis
1993
David
Kimbrough,
Janice
Wakakuwa
Enviro.
Sci.
&
Tech
27:
2692­
2699
Critique
Defining
the
Limits
1993
G.
Stanko,
W.
Krochta,
A.
Stanley,
T.

Dawson,
K.
Hillig,
R.
Javick,
R.
Obrycki,
B.

Hughes,
F.
Saksa
Environmental
Lab
1:
16­
20
Critique
A
Study
of
the
Precision
of
Lead
Measurements
at
Concentrations
Near
the
Method
Limit
of
Detection
1993
P.
M.
Berthouex
Water
Environment
Research
65:
620­
629
Critique
Detection
Limit
Concepts:
Foundations,
Myths,
and
Utilization
1992
D.
A.
Chambers,
S.
S.
Dubose,
E.
L.

Sensintaffar
Health
Phys.
63:
338­
340
Critique
Difficulties
Related
to
Using
Extreme
Percentiles
for
Water
Quality
Regulations
1991
A
Simple
Rule
for
Judging
Compliance
Using
highly
Censored
Samples
1991
P.
M.
Berthouex,
Ian
Hau
Research
Journal
WPCF
63:
873­
879
Critique
P.
M.
Berthouex,
Ian
Hau
Research
Journal
WPCF
63:
880­
886
Critique
Current
Method
for
Setting
Dioxin
Limits
in
Water
Requires
Reexamination
1990
J.
LaKind,
E.
Rifkin
Env.
Sci.
&
Tech
24:
963­
965
Critique
Kaiser
3­
Sigma
Criterion
­
A
Review
of
the
Limit
of
Detection
1990
L.
S.
Oresic,
V.
Grdinic
Acta
Pharmaceutica
Jugoslavica
40:
21­
61
Critique
MCL
Noncompliance:
Is
the
Laboratory
at
Fault?
1990
Steven
Koorse
AWWA
p53­
58
Critique
Qualitative
or
Quantitative
Characterization
of
Spectrographic
Methods?
The
Detection
and
Determination
Limits
1990
Karol
Florian
Chemia
Analityczna
35:
129­
139
Critique
False
Positives,
Detection
Limits,
and
Other
Laboratory
Imperfections:
The
Regulatory
Implications
1989
Steven
Koorse
Environmental
Law
Reporter
19:
10211­
10222
Critique
Evaluation
of
Detection
Limit
Estimators
1988
F.
C.
Garner,
G.
L.
Robertson
Chemometrics
and
Intelligent
Laboratory
Systems
3:
53­
59
Critique
Chemometrics
­
Measurement
Reliability
1988
K.
Castaneda­
Mendez
Clinical
Chemistry
34:
2494­
2498
Critique
The
Detection
Limit
1988
P.
S.
Porter,
R.
C.
Ward,
H.
F.
Bell
Environmental
Science
&
Technology
22:
856­
861
Critique
Estimation
of
Detection
Limits
for
Environmental
Analytical
Procedures
­
A
Tutorial
1988
Cliff
Kirchmer
ACS
Symposium
Series
361:
78­
93
Critique
Limits
of
Detection
1984
J.
K.
Taylor
Analytical
Chemistry
56:
130A
Critique
Clarification
of
the
Limit
of
Detection
in
Chromatography
1984
J.
P.
Foley,
J.
G.
Dorsey
Chromatographia
18:
503­
511
Critique
Limit
of
Detection:
A
Closer
Look
at
the
IUPAC
Definition
1983
Gary
Long,
J.
D.
Winefordner
Analytical
Chem.
55:
712­
724
Critique
Trace
Analyses
for
Wastewaters
1982
C.
J.
Kirchmer
Envir.
Sci.
&
Tech.
16:
430A
Critique
A­
8
Title
Year
Author
Source
Category
A
comparison
of
statistical
and
empirical
detection
limits
1998
G.
C.
C.
Su
Journal
of
AOAC
International
81:
105­
110
Multilab
Challenges
in
Regulatory
Environmetrics
1997
C.
B.
Davis
Chemometrics
Intelligent
Laboratory
Systems
37:
43­
53
Multilab
Determining
Quantitation
Levels
for
Regulatory
Purposes
1996
P.
F.
Sanders,
R.
L.
Lippincott,
A.
Eaton
Journal
American
Water
Works
Association
88:
104­
114
Multilab
Defining
Detection
and
Quantitation
Levels
1993
Raymond
Maddalone,
James
Rice,
Ben
Edmondson,
Babu
Nott,
Judith
Scott
Water
Envir.
&
Tech.
Jan.
93:
41­
44
Multilab
Concept
2000­
A
Statistical
Approach
for
Analytical
Practice
­
Part
I:
Limits
of
Detection,
Identification,
and
Determination
1999
Hadrich
J
et
al.
Deutsche
Lebensmittel­
Rundschau
1999,
95(
10),
428­
436
not
found
Statistics
and
Environmental
Policy:
Case
Studies
from
Long­
Term
Environmental
Monitoring
Data
1999
Goudey
R
et
al.
Novart
FDN
Sym
220;
144­
157
not
found
The
Many
Dimensions
of
Detection
in
Chemical
Analysis
1983
Currie
LA
Abstracts
of
Papers
of
the
American
Chemical
Society,
185
(
Mar),
63­
PEST
not
found
A
Practical
Strategy
for
Determining
and
Verifying
Detection
Limits
2001
T.
Georgian,
K.
E.
Osborn
Env.
Testing
&
Analysis
10:
13­
14
Single
lab
Review
of
the
Methods
of
the
US
Environmental
Protection
Agency
for
Bromate
Determination
and
Validation
of
Method
317.0
for
Disinfection
By­
Product
Anions
and
Low
­
Level
Bromate
2001
D.
P.
Hautman,
D.
J.
Munch,
C.
Frebis,

H.
P.
Wagner,
B.
V.
Pepich
Journal
of
Chromatography
A
920:
221­
229
Single
lab
Comparison
of
Detection
Limits
in
Environmental
Analysis
­
Is
it
Possible?
An
Approach
on
Quality
Assurance
in
the
Lower
Working
Range
by
Verification
2001
S.
Geib,
J.
W.
Einax
Fresenius
Journal
of
Analytical
Chemistry
370:
673­
678
Single
lab
On
the
Assessment
of
Compliance
with
Legal
Limits,
Part
I:
Signal
and
Concentration
Domains
2001
E.
Desimoni,
S.
Mannino,
B.
Brunetti
Accreditation
Quality
Assurance
6:
452­
458
Single
lab
Capability
of
Detection
­
Part
2
2000
ISO
ISO
11843­
2
Single
lab
Nomenclature
in
Evaluation
of
Analytical
Methods
Including
Detection
and
Quantitation
Capabilities
(
IUPAC
Recommendations
1995)
1999
L.
A.
Currie
Analytica
Chimica
Acta
391:
105­
126
Single
lab
New
Reporting
Procedures
Based
on
Long­
Term
Method
Detection
Limits
and
Some
Considerations
for
Interpretations
of
Water­
Quality
Data
Provided
by
the
U.
S.
Geological
Survey
National
Water
Quality
Laboratory
1999
C.
J.
Obinger
Childress,
W.
T.
Foreman,

B.
F.
Connor,
and
T.
J.
Maloney
USGS
Open­
File
Report
99­
193,
19
pages.
Single
lab
Analyses
of
Polychlorinated
Biphenyls
and
Chlorinated
Pesticides
in
Biota:

Method
and
Quality
Assurance
1999
P.
Cleemann,
G.
B.
Paulsen
Journal
of
AOAC
International
82:
1175­
1184
Single
lab
Detection
Limits
of
Organic
Contaminants
in
Drinking
Water
1998
W.
M.
Draper,
J.
S.
Dhoot,
J.
S.
Dhaliwal,

J.
W.
Remoy,
S.
K.
Perera,
F.
J.
Baumann
Journal
of
the
American
Water
Works
Association
90:
82­
90
Single
lab
Detection:
International
Update,
and
Some
Emerging
Di­
lemmas
Involving
Calibration,
the
Blank,
and
Multiple
Detection
Decisions
1997
L.
A.
Currie
Chemometrics
and
Intelligent
Laboratory
Systems
37:
151­

181
Single
lab
Regulations
­
From
an
Industry
Perspective
or
Relationships
Between
Detection
Limits,
Quantitation
Limits,
and
Significant
Digits
1997
D.
Coleman,
J.
Auses,
N.
Grams
Chemometrics
and
Intelligent
Laboratory
Systems
37:
71­
80
Single
lab
Capability
of
Detection
­
Part
1
1997
ISO
ISO
11843­
1
Single
lab
A­
9
Title
Year
Author
Source
Category
Determination
of
Site­
Specific
Effluent
Detection
Limits
1996
George
Neserke,
Harold
Taylor
Water
Env.
Res.
66:
115­
119
Single
lab
Multivariate
Detection
Limits
Estimators
1996
R.
Boque,
F.
X.
Rius
Chemometrics
and
Intelligent
Laboratory
Systems
32:
11­
23
Single
lab
Nomenclature
in
Evaluation
of
Analytical
Methods
including
Detection
and
Quantification
Capabilities
1995
Lloyd
Currie
Pure
&
Single
lab
Reporting
Low­
Level
Analytical
Data
Third
Draft
(
1995­
11­
08)
­­
New
Project
of
Commission
V.
I.,
International
Union
of
Pure
and
Applied
Chemistry
1995
William
Horwitz
IUPAC
Single
lab
IUPAC
Recommendations
for
Defining
and
Measuring
Detection
and
Quantification
Limits
1994
LA
Currie,
W.
Horwitz
Analuses
Magazine
22:
24­
26
Single
lab
Recommendations
for
the
Presentation
of
Results
of
Chemical
Analysis
1994
L.
A.
Currie,
G.
Svehla
Pure
&
Applied
Chemistry
66:
595­
608
Single
lab
Detarchi­
A
Program
for
Detection
Limits
with
Specified
Assurance
Probabilities
and
Characteristic
Curves
of
Detection
1994
L.
Sarabia,
M.
C.
Ortiz
TRAC­
Trends
in
Analytical
Chemistry
13:
1­
6
Single
lab
Quality
Control
Level:
An
Alternative
to
Detection
Levels
1994
D.
E.
Kimbrough,
J.
Wakakuwa
Environmental
Science
&
Technology
28:
338­
345
Single
lab
Multivariate
Decision
and
Detection
Limits
1993
A.
Singh
Analytica
Chimica
Acta
277:
205­
214
Single
lab
A
Model
of
Measurement
Precision
at
Low
Concentrations
1993
P.
M.
Berthouex,
D.
R.
Gan
Water
Environment
Research
65:
759­
763
Single
lab
Appl.
Chem.
67:
1699­
1723
Robust
Procedure
for
Calibration
and
Calculation
of
the
Detection
Limit
of
Trimipramine
by
Adsorptive
Stripping
Voltametry
at
a
Carbon
Paste
Electrode
1993
M.
C.
Ortiz,
J.
Arcos,
J.
V.
Jurarros,
J.

Lopez­
Palacios,
L.
A.
Sarabia
Analytical
Chemistry
65:
678­
682
Single
lab
Nondetects,
Detection
Limits,
and
the
Probability
of
Detection
1991
D.
Lambert,
B.
Peterson,
I.
Terpenning
JASA
86:
266­
277
Single
lab
Detection
Limits:
For
Linear
Calibration
Curves
with
Increasing
Variance
and
Multiple
Future
Detection
Decisions
1991
R.
D.
Gibbons,
F.
H.
Jarke,
K.
P.
Stoub
Waste
Testing
and
Quality
Assurance:

Friedman,
Ed.,
American
Society
for
Testing
and
Materials,

Philadelphia
3:
337­
390
Single
labASTM
STP
1075,
D.

Limits
of
Detection
in
Multivariate
Calibration
1991
G.
Bauer,
W.
Wegscheider,
H.
M.
Ortner
Fresenius
Journal
of
Analytical
Chemistry
340:
135­
139
Single
lab
Estimating
Detection
Limits
in
Ultratrace
Analysis.
Part
I:
The
Variability
of
Estimated
Detection
Limits
1991
C.
L.
Stevenson,
J.
D.
Winefordner
Applied
Spectroscopy
45:
1217­
1224
Single
lab
Reporting
Low­
Level
Data
for
Computerized
Data
Bases
1988
M.
Brossman,
G.
McKenna,
H.
Kahn,
D.

King,
R.
Kleopfer,
J.
Taylor`
ACS
Symposium
Series
361:
317­
327
Single
lab
Detection
Limits
with
Specified
Assurance
Probabilities
1987
C.
A.
Clayton,
J.
W.
Hines,
and
P.
D.
Elkins
Analytical
Chemistry
59:
2506­
2514
Single
lab
Limit
of
Detection
and
Limit
of
Determination
­
Application
of
Different
Statistical
Approaches
to
an
Illustrative
Example
of
Residue
Analysis
1987
J.
Vogelgesang
Fresenius
Zeitschrift
Fur
Analytsche
Chemie
328:
213­
220
Single
lab
Determining
the
Lowest
Limit
of
Reliable
Assay
Measurement
1983
L.
Oppenheimer,
T.
P.
Capizzi,
R.
M.

Weppelman,
H.
Mehta
Analytical
Chemistry
55:
638­
643
Single
lab
Principles
of
Environmental
Analysis
1983
L.
H.
Keith,
W.
Crummett,
J.
Deegan
Jr,

R.
A.
Libby,
J.
K.
Taylor,
G.
Wentler
Analytical
Chemistry
55:
2210­
2218
Single
lab
A­
10
Title
Year
Author
Source
Category
Trace
Analyses
for
Wastewaters
1981
John
Glaser,
Denis
Foerst,
Gerald
McKee,

Stephan
Quave,
William
Budde
Env.
Sci.
&
Tech
15:
1426­
1435
Single
lab
Guidelines
for
Data
Acquisition
and
Data
Quality
Evaluation
in
Environmental
Chemistry
1980
MacDougall,
Daniel,
et
al.
Anal.
Chem.
52:
2242­
2249
Single
lab
Sensitivity
and
Limit
of
Detection
in
Quantitative
Spectrometric
Methods
1974
J.
D.
Ingle
Jr.
Journal
of
Chemical
Education,
51,
100­
105.
Single
lab
Decision
and
Detection
Limits
for
Linear
Calibration
Curves
1970
A.
Hubaux,
G.
Vos
Analytical
Chemistry
42:
849­
855
Single
lab
Limits
for
Quantitative
Detection
and
Quantitative
Determination
1968
L.
A.
Currie
Analytical
Chemistry
40:
586­
593
Single
lab
A
Statistical
Method
for
Evaluation
of
Limiting
Detectable
Sample
Concentrations
1967
P.
A.
St.
John,
W.
J.
McCarthy,
J.
D.

Winefordner
Analytical
Chem.
39:
1495­
1597
Single
lab
Initial
Evaluation
of
Quantitative
Performance
of
Chromatographic
Methods
Using
Replicates
at
Multiple
Concentrations
2001
M.
A.
Castillo,
R.
C.
Castells
Journal
of
Chromatography
A
921:
121­
133
Single
lab
­

multilevel
Multivariate
Detection
Limits
with
Fixed
Probabilities
of
Error
1999
R.
Boque,
M.
S.
Larrechi,
F.
X.
Rius
Chemometrics
and
Intelligent
Laboratory
Systems
45:
397­

408
Single
lab
­

multilevel
Evaluation
of
Approximate
Methods
for
Calculating
the
Limit
of
Detection
and
Limit
of
Quantification
1999
M.
E.
Zorn,
R.
D.
Gibbons,
W.
C.
Sonzogni
Environmental
Science
&
Technology
33:
2291­
2295
Single
lab
­

multilevel
Limits
of
Detection,
Identification
and
Determination:
A
Statistical
Approach
for
Practitioners
1998
J.
Vogelgesang,
J.
Hadrich
Accreditation
Quality
Assurance
3:
242­
255
Single
lab
­

multilevel
Weighted
Least­
Squares
Approach
to
Calculating
Limits
of
Detection
and
Quantification
by
Modeling
Variability
as
a
Function
of
Concentration
1997
M.
E.
Zorn,,
R.
D.
Gibbons,
W.
C.
Sonzogni
Analytical
Chemistry
69:
3069­
3075
Single
lab
­

multilevel
Detection
Limits
in
GC­
MS
Multivariate
Analysis
1997
Boque
R
et
al.
Quimica
Analytica,
16(
2),
81­
86
Single
lab
­

multilevel
An
Alternative
Minimum
Level
Definition
for
Analytical
Quantification
1997
Robert
Gibbons,
David
Coleman,

Raymond
Maddalone
Environmental
Science
&
Technology
31:
2071­
2077
Single
lab
­

multilevel
A
Two­
Component
Model
for
Measurement
Error
in
Analytical
Chemistry
1995
David
Rocke,
Stefan
Lorenzato
Technometrics
37:
176­
184
Single
lab
­

multilevel
Practical
Quantitation
Limits
1992
R.
D.
Gibbons,
N.
E.
Grams,
F.
H.
Jarke,

K.
P.
Stoub
Chemometrics
and
Intelligent
Laboratory
Systems
12:
225­

235.
Single
lab
­

multilevel
Experimental
Comparison
of
EPA
and
USATHAMA
Detection
and
Quantitation
Capability
Estimators
1991
C.
L.
Grant,
A.
D.
Hewitt,
T.
F.
Jenkins
American
Laboratory
23:
15­
33
Single
lab
­

multilevel
High
Pressure
Liquid
Chromatography
Determination
of
the
Intermediates
Side
Reaction
Products
in
FD&
C
Red
No.
2
and
FD&
C
Yellow
No.
5:
Statistical
Analysis
of
Instrument
Response
1978
C.
J.
Bayley,
E.
A.
Cox,
J.
A.
Springer
J.
Assoc.
Off.
Anal.
Chem
61:
1404­
1414.
Single
lab
­

multilevel
Method
Detection
Limits:
ation
to
Organic
Environmental
Chemistry
Data
2002Applic
Wade,
T.
L.,
J.
L.
Sericano,
Y.
Qian,
G.
Presentation
at
ACS
Symposium,
Boston,
MA,
August
2002
Suggested
by
a
Wolff,
and
G.
Denoux
peer
reviewer
A­
11
Title
Year
Author
Source
Category
Detection
limits
2002
van
Encyclopedia
of
Environmetrics,
1,
El­
Shaarawi,
A.
H.
and
Piegorsch,
W.
W.
(
eds.),
504­
515.
Chichester:
John
Wiley
&

Sons
Suggested
by
a
peer
reviewer
Statistical
Approaches
to
Estimating
Mean
Water
Quality
Concentration
with
Detection
Limits
2002
Shumway,
R.,
R.
Azari,
and
M.
Kayhanian
Environmental
Science
and
Technology
36:
Suggested
by
a
peer
reviewer
Detection
Limit
of
Isotope
Dilution
Mass
Spectrometry
2002
Yu,
L.
L.,
J.
D.
Fassett,
and
W.
F.
Guthrie
Analytical
Chemistry.
74:
3887­
3891
Suggested
by
a
peer
reviewer
ISO
17025
Requirements:
How
to
Evaluate
Uncertainty
for
Dioxin
Analysis
in
Food
and
Feed
from
Validation
Data?
2002
G.
Eppe,
and
E.
De
Pauw
Proceedings
of
the
22nd
International
Symposium
on
Halogenated
Environmental
Organic
Pollutants
and
POPs,

Barcelona,
Spain,
August
12­
18,
2002,
Vol.
59,
pp.
403­

406,
2002
Suggested
by
a
peer
reviewer
Are
Target
Dioxin
Levels
in
Animal
Feedingstuffs
Achievable
for
Laboratories
in
Terms
of
Analytical
Requirements?
Results
of
an
Interlaboratory
study
2002
G.
Eppe,
and
E.
De
Pauw
Proceedings
of
the
22nd
International
Symposium
on
Halogenated
Environmental
Organic
Pollutants
and
POPs,

Barcelona,
Spain,
August
12­
18,
2002,
Vol.
59,
pp.
407­

410,
2002
Suggested
by
a
peer
reviewer
Environmental
Statistics
with
S­
PLUS
2001
Millard,
S.
P.,
and
Neerchal,
N.
K.
Chapman
&
Hall/
CRC,
Boca
Raton,
FL
Suggested
by
a
peer
reviewer
Quantifying
Uncertainty
in
Analytical
Chemistry
2000
Ellison,
S.
L.
R.,
M.
Roslein,
and
A.

Williams,
eds.
EURACHEM/
CITAC
Guide
2000
Suggested
by
a
peer
reviewer
Development
and
Harmonisation
of
Measurement
Uncertainty
Principles.

Protocol
for
Uncertainty
Evaluation
from
Validation
Data
2000
Barwick
V.
J.,
Ellison
S.
L.
R.
VAM
Project
3.2.1
Suggested
by
a
peer
reviewer
Statistical
Procedures
for
Analysis
of
Environmental
Monitoring
Data
&
Risk
Assessment
1998
McBean,
E.
A.,
and
Rovers,
F.
A.
Prentice
Hall
PTR,
Upper
Saddle
River,
NJ
Suggested
by
a
peer
reviewer
Foundations
and
future
of
detection
and
quantification
1996
Currie,
L.
A.
Proceedings
of
an
Statistical
Association,
Section
on
Statistics
and
the
Environment,
1­
8
Suggested
by
a
peer
reviewer
Statistical
Methods
for
Groundwater
Monitoring
1994
Gibbons,
R.
D.
John
Wiley
&
Sons,
New
York
Suggested
by
a
peer
reviewer
Spatial
hemostatistics
1994
Cressie,
Environmental
Statistics,
Assessment,
and
Forecasting,

Cothern,
C.
R.
and
Ross,
N.
P.
(
eds.),
131­
146.
Boca
Raton,

FL:
Lewis
Publishers
Suggested
by
a
peer
reviewer
Voet,
H.

der
3345­
3353
limits
the
Americ
c
N.

Hypothesis
testing
with
values
below
detection
limit
in
environmental
studies
1994
Slyman,
D.
J.,
de
Peyster,
A.,
and
Donohoe,
R.
R
Environmental
Science
&
Technology
28:
898­
90
Suggested
by
a
peer
reviewer
A
new
approach
for
accommodation
of
below
detection
limit
data
in
trend
analysis
of
water
quality
1994
Nagaraj,
N.
K.,
and
Brunenmeister,
S.
L.
Environmental
Statistics,
Assessment,
and
Forecasting,

Cothern,
C.
R.
and
Ross,
N.
P.
(
eds.),
113­
127.
Boca
Raton,

FL:
Lewis
Publishers
Suggested
by
a
peer
reviewer
Errors
and
detection
limits
1992
Adams,
M.
J.
In
Methods
of
Environmental
Data
Analysis,
Hewitt,
C.
N.

(
ed.),
181­
212.
Amsterdam:
Elsevier
Applied
Science
Suggested
by
a
peer
reviewer
A­
12
Title
Year
Author
Source
Category
Statistical
inference
from
multiply
censored
environmental
data
1991
El­
Shaarawi,
A.
H.,
and
Naderi,
A
Environmental
Monitoring
and
Assessment
17:
339­
347
Suggested
by
a
peer
reviewer
Less
than
obvious:
Statistical
treatment
of
data
below
the
detection
limit
1990
Helsel,
D.
R
Environmental
Science
&
Technology
24:
Suggested
by
a
peer
reviewer
1766­
1774
Environmental
tests:
Are
they
valid?
1990
Maynard,
A.
W.
Chemical
Technology
20:
151­
155.
Suggested
by
a
peer
reviewer
Detection
in
Analytical
Chemistry:
Importance,
Theory,
and
Practice
1988
Currie,
L.
A.
American
Chemical
Society,
New
York
Suggested
by
a
peer
reviewer
A­
13