Document ID: EPA-R02-OAR-2010-0310-0001
Agency: epa
Document Type: Proposed Rule
Title: Approvals and Promulgations of Implementation Plans: New Jersey; 8-hour Ozone Control Measures
Posted Date: 2010-07-22T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 140 (Thursday, July 22, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 42672-42676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-17949]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R02-OAR-2010-0310, FRL-9178-6]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New Jersey; 8-
hour Ozone Control Measures

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve a request by New Jersey to revise the State Implementation Plan 
(SIP) for ozone involving the control of volatile organic compounds 
(VOCs). The proposed SIP revision consists of two new rules, 
``Subchapter 26, Prevention of Air Pollution From Adhesives, Sealants, 
Adhesive Primers and Sealant Primers,'' and ``Subchapter 34, TBAC 
Emissions Reporting,'' (TBAC means tertiary butyl acetate or t-butyl 
acetate) and revisions to ``Subchapter 23, Prevention of Air Pollution 
From Architectural Coatings,'' ``Subchapter 24, Prevention of Air 
Pollution From Consumer Products,'' and ``Subchapter 25, Control and 
Prohibition of Air Pollution by Vehicular Fuels,'' of the New Jersey 
Administrative Codes. The intended effect of this action is to approve 
control strategies that will result in VOC emission reductions that 
will help achieve attainment of the national ambient air quality 
standard for ozone.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 23, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID number EPA-
R02-OAR-2010-0310, by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line 
instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail: Werner.Raymond@epa.gov
     Fax: 212-637-3901.
     Mail: Raymond Werner, Chief, Air Programs Branch, 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, 290 Broadway, 25th 
Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866.
     Hand Delivery: Raymond Werner, Chief, Air Programs Branch, 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, 290 Broadway, 25th 
Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866. Such deliveries are only accepted 
during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation. The Regional 
Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 
4:30 excluding Federal holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R02-OAR-
2010-0310. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included 
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at 
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information 
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you 
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site 
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your 
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of 
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without 
going through http://www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be 
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is 
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you 
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name 
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any 
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to 
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA 
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid 
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of 
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public 
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some 
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information 
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such 
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. 
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically 
in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region II Office, Air Programs Branch, 290 Broadway, 
25th Floor, New York,

[[Page 42673]]

New York 10007-1866. EPA requests, if at all possible, that you contact 
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 
view the hard copy of the docket. You may view the hard copy of the 
docket Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., excluding Federal 
holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Truchan, Air Programs Branch, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, 
New York 10007-1866, (212) 637-4249.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    The following table of contents describes the format of this 
rulemaking:

I. What was included in New Jersey's submittal?
II. What is EPA's evaluation of ``Subchapter 24, Prevention of Air 
Pollution From Consumer Products?''
III. What is EPA's evaluation of ``Subchapter 26, Prevention of Air 
Pollution From Adhesives, Sealants, Adhesive Primers and Sealant 
Primers?''
IV. What is EPA's evaluation of ``Subchapter 34, TBAC Emissions 
Reporting?''
V. What other rules are affected by the VOC definition change and 
EPA's evaluation?
VI. What action is EPA proposing?
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    For detailed information on New Jersey's proposed SIP revision and 
EPA's evaluation see the Technical Support Document (TSD), prepared in 
support of today's action. The TSD can be viewed at http://www.regulations.gov.

I. What was included in New Jersey's submittal?

    On April 9, 2009, Mark N. Mauriello, Commissioner, New Jersey 
Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP), submitted to EPA a 
revision to the New Jersey State Implementation Plan (SIP) that 
included:

--``Subchapter 24, Prevention of Air Pollution From Consumer 
Products,''
--``Subchapter 26, Prevention of Air Pollution From Adhesives, 
Sealants, Adhesive Primers and Sealant Primers,''
--``Subchapter 34, TBAC Emissions Reporting,'' and
--Amending the definition of VOC throughout Title 7, Chapter 27 of the 
New Jersey Administrative Codes (N.J.A.C.) and Chapter 27A, and Chapter 
27B.

    The State adopted these rules on October 30, 2008 and published the 
adoption in the New Jersey Register on December 1, 2008 (40 New Jersey 
Register 6769). These rules became operative on December 29, 2008. Also 
published in the New Jersey Register was a summary of the comments 
received, the State response to the comments and any changes to the 
proposed rule resulting from the comments. This SIP revision will 
provide statewide volatile organic compound (VOC) emission reductions 
that New Jersey used in the SIP to address reasonable further progress 
goals and for attaining the 1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air 
quality standard.
    This proposed SIP revision completes the commitment New Jersey made 
as part of its RACT analysis and 8-hour Ozone Attainment Demonstration 
that EPA conditionally approved. See 74 FR 22837 (May 15, 2009). If EPA 
approves this proposed SIP revision, the RACT analysis will be fully 
approved in its entirety and EPA will replace the conditionally 
approved RACT in the SIP with a full approval.

II. What is EPA's evaluation of ``Subchapter 24, Prevention of Air 
Pollution From Consumer Products?''

A. Was Subchapter 24 previously approved by EPA?

    The most recent approval of Subchapter 24 occurred on January 25, 
2006 (71 FR 4045). EPA had previously approved Subchapter 24 provisions 
for accepting innovative products exemptions (IPEs), alternative 
compliance plans (ACPs), and variances that have been approved by the 
California Air Resources Board (CARB) or other states with adopted 
consumer product regulations based on the Ozone Transport Commission 
(OTC) ``Model Rule for Consumer Products.'' These provisions were fully 
discussed in previous rulemakings. As part of a previous SIP revision, 
New Jersey committed to forwarding all innovative product exemptions, 
alternative compliance plans and variances that the State accepts to 
EPA Region 2, in order for EPA to be able to determine what the 
compliance requirements are for all sources regulated by the New Jersey 
SIP. There have been no changes to these provisions in the current 
rulemaking and EPA's previous findings still stand.

B. How was ``Subchapter 24, Prevention of Air Pollution From Consumer 
Products'' revised?

1. Chemically Formulated Consumer Products
    New Jersey revised Subchapter 24's provisions consistent with the 
OTC's 2007 model rules that were in turn based on the 2005 CARB rules. 
The revisions to Subchapter 24 add eleven new categories of consumer 
products not previously regulated and revise one existing category. 
Other revisions adopted by New Jersey include adding/clarifying 
definitions, requiring notifications for products sold toward the end 
of a sell-through period, prohibiting solid air fresheners or toilet/
urinal care products from containing para-dichlorobenzene (a toxic air 
contaminant/hazardous air pollutant). In addition, any contact 
adhesive, electronic cleaner, footwear or leather care product, general 
purpose degreaser, adhesive remover, electrical cleaner, graffiti 
remover or automotive consumer product manufactured on and after 
January 1, 2009 is prohibited from containing chlorinated toxic air 
contaminants. Products manufactured before this date that do not meet 
the new standards can be sold until December 31, 2011 provided the 
product or packaging displays the date on which the product was 
manufactured.
    All requirements apply statewide. Subchapter 24 requires that, on 
or after January 1, 2009, no person shall sell, supply, offer for sale, 
or manufacture consumer products that contain VOCs in excess of the VOC 
content limits specified by New Jersey for those products sold in New 
Jersey. Subchapter 24 includes specific exemptions, as well as 
registration and product labeling requirements, recordkeeping and 
reporting requirements, and test methods and procedures. Consumer 
products that are sold in New Jersey for shipment and use outside of 
the State of New Jersey are exempt from the VOC content limits. This 
exemption reflects the intent to regulate only the manufacture and 
distribution of consumer products that actually emit VOCs into New 
Jersey's air and not to interfere in the transportation of goods that 
are destined for use outside of the State.
2. Portable Fuel Containers
    Subchapter 24 regulates portable fuel containers and/or spouts. New 
Jersey revised Subchapter 24's provisions consistent with the OTC's 
2007 model rule that was in turn based on the 2006 CARB regulation. The 
revised rule requires that portable fuel containers and/or spouts must 
now be certified for use and sale by the manufacturer through CARB or 
the EPA as meeting performance standards or specifically exempted by 
either CARB or EPA. The revised rule also applies to containers labeled 
for kerosene use. Other revisions incorporated into Subchapter 24 
include: modifying the existing spout regulations in order to improve 
spillage control; elimination of the fuel flow rate and fill level 
performance standards; elimination of the automatic shutoff performance 
standard; and new portable

[[Page 42674]]

fuel container testing procedures to streamline testing. Portable fuel 
containers or spouts or both portable fuel containers and spouts, that 
do not meet the new specifications, manufactured before January 28, 
2009 may continue to be sold until December 29, 2009 provided it is 
labeled or designated for use solely with kerosene and the date of 
manufacture or a date-code representing the date of manufacture is 
clearly displayed on the product. Subchapter 24 includes administrative 
requirements, such as labeling, recordkeeping, and reporting 
requirements.

C. What is EPA's evaluation?

    The revisions to Subchapter 24 expand the number of consumer 
product categories that are regulated and revised and improved the 
portable fuel container requirements consistent with the OTC Model 
rules and CARB rules. These changes will result in additional VOC 
emission reductions.
    EPA has evaluated New Jersey's revisions to Subchapter 24 for 
consistency with the Act, EPA regulations, and EPA policy. EPA has 
determined that the revisions to Subchapter 24 meet the section 110 SIP 
revision requirements of the Act. EPA is proposing to approve this 
rule.

III. What is EPA's evaluation of ``Subchapter 26, Prevention of Air 
Pollution From Adhesives, Sealants, Adhesive Primers and Sealant 
Primers?''

A. Background

    The OTC States developed a Model Rule entitled ``OTC Model Rule For 
Adhesives and Sealants'' dated 2006 which was based on the 1998 CARB 
reasonably available control technology determination. This RACT 
determination applied to both the manufacture and use of adhesives, 
sealants, adhesive primers or sealant primers, in both industrial/
manufacturing facilities and in the field. California air districts 
used this determination to develop regulations for this category. The 
EPA addressed this source category with a Control Techniques Guideline 
(CTG) document for Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives dated September 
2008. This CTG was developed in response to the Section 183(e) 
requirement for EPA to study and regulate consumer and commercial 
products included in EPA's Report to Congress, ``Study of Volatile 
Organic Compound Emissions from Consumer and Commercial Products--
Comprehensive Emissions Inventory.'' The section 183(e) miscellaneous 
industrial adhesives category was limited to adhesives and adhesive 
primers used in industrial/manufacturing operations and did not include 
products applied in the field. Therefore, the OTC Model Rule and state 
efforts in developing individual regulations preceded EPA's CTG for 
this source category and were broader in applicability.

B. What Does Subchapter 26 Require?

    Subchapter 26 is a new rule based on the OTC model rule that in 
turn was based on the CARB model rule. Subchapter 26 addresses 
adhesive, sealants, adhesive primers and sealant primers that are sold 
in larger containers and used primarily in commercial/industrial 
applications, but includes residential applications of these products, 
such as carpet and flooring installations, roofing installations, etc. 
Small container household adhesives are regulated by ``Subchapter 24, 
Prevention of Air Pollution from Consumer Products.''
    Subchapter 26 is applicable to those who sell, supply, offer for 
sale or manufacture for sale, in New Jersey, any adhesives, sealants, 
adhesive primer or sealant primer, for use in New Jersey. It is also 
applicable to any person who uses or applies any adhesive, sealant, 
adhesive primer or sealant primer for compensation within New Jersey. 
This rule will not apply to homeowners who may be using these products 
for home repair and renovations. The VOC limits apply to those products 
manufactured for sale and use in New Jersey on and after January 1, 
2009 and allows for the unlimited sell-through and use of non-compliant 
products manufactured before January 1, 2009 provided they contain a 
date or date code when they were manufactured. These limits are 
identical to those in the OTC and CARB model rules. The limits also 
apply to all products manufactured after January 1, 2009 in New Jersey 
for sale and use in New Jersey.
    As an alternative to the VOC limits established in Table 1 of 
Subchapter 26, operators of stationary sources that use or apply 
adhesives, sealants, or adhesive or sealant primers have the option of 
using add-on pollution control equipment rather than complying with the 
Table 1 limits. Requirements applying to air pollution control 
equipment include: an overall capture and control efficiency of at 
least 85 percent, by weight; the continuous monitoring of combustion 
temperature, inlet and exhaust gas temperatures and control device 
efficiency, depending upon the type of add-on controls used; and the 
maintenance of operation records to demonstrate compliance.
    Subchapter 26 contains requirements for work practices, surface 
preparation and cleanup solvent composition. Subchapter 26 also 
includes specific exemptions, as well as registration and product 
labeling requirements, recordkeeping requirements, and test methods and 
compliance procedures.

C. What is EPA's evaluation?

    Subchapter 26 contains the required elements for a federally 
enforceable rule: emission limitations, compliance procedures and test 
methods, compliance dates and record keeping provisions.
    In comparison to the CTG, Subchapter 26 is applicable to all 
stationary sources including those applications that occur outside of 
the factory setting, that is, applied in the field. In addition there 
are provisions that apply to the selling, supplying, offering for sale 
or manufacture for sale in New Jersey of adhesives, sealants, adhesive 
primers and sealant primers along with container labeling requirements 
and product registrations. The VOC content restrictions for these 
products apply to both their manufacture and application. Stationary 
sources also have the option of using add-on control equipment that 
achieves 85 percent control. Subchapter 26 also regulates the VOC 
content/vapor pressure of surface-preparation and clean-up solvents for 
which the CTG did not make recommendations for other than including 
work practices.
    EPA recommends that when the states evaluate RACT, as required by 
section 182(b) when implementing a revised 8-hour ozone standard,\1\ 
that they review the VOC content limits for wood adhesives and evaluate 
the benefit of requiring improved methods for applying coatings 
regulated by Subchapter 26.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See 75 FR 2938 (January 19, 2010). In this proposed rule, 
based upon reconsideration of the primary and secondary ozone 
standards, EPA proposed to set different primary and secondary 
standards than those promulgated in March 2008 to provide requisite 
protection of public health and welfare, respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Overall, Subchapter 26: (1) Regulates the same adhesives and 
adhesive primers as the CTG with the addition of regulating sealants 
and sealant primers, (2) applies to additional stationary sources, and 
(3) provides for similar exemptions as the CTG recommends.
    EPA has evaluated New Jersey's submittal for consistency with the 
Act, EPA regulations, and EPA policy. EPA has determined that 
Subchapter 26 is as effective in regulating this source category as the 
CTG and proposes to

[[Page 42675]]

approve it as part of the SIP and as meeting the requirement to adopt a 
RACT rule for the Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives CTG category.

IV. What is EPA's evaluation of ``Subchapter 34, TBAC Emissions 
Reporting?''

A. What does EPA require?

    The EPA revised the definition of VOC to exclude tertiary butyl 
acetate or t-butyl acetate (TBAC) from VOC emissions limitations or VOC 
content requirements, but requires that TBAC be considered a VOC for 
purposes of recordkeeping, emissions reporting, photochemical 
dispersion modeling and inventory requirements. See 69 FR 69298 
(November 29, 2004). While TBAC is now considered ``negligibly 
reactive,'' EPA is concerned that should TBAC usage substantially 
increase it may contribute significantly to ozone formation even with 
its lower reactivity. For this reason it is necessary to track and 
account for TBAC emissions.

B. What does Subchapter 34 require?

    New Jersey proposed and adopted a new rule, Subchapter 34, to meet 
these requirements along with a revised definition of VOC that is 
consistent with EPA's definition in 40 CFR 51.100(s). It requires 
manufacturers located in New Jersey who manufacture TBAC or a product 
containing TBAC, or manufacturers who produce a product containing TBAC 
that is sold in New Jersey, to report the estimated amount of actual 
emissions in pounds per ozone-season day and pounds per year that is 
emitted in New Jersey. The rule also contains methods for calculating 
the amount of TBAC and recordkeeping requirements.

C. What is EPA's evaluation?

    Generally the rule satisfies EPA requirements and guidance with one 
exception. The rule requires the reporting of ``pounds per ozone-season 
day,'' but only contains a definition for ``ozone season.'' In the 
``Background'' section of the proposed rulemaking (39 New Jersey 
Register 4492, November 5, 2007), New Jersey states that in developing 
the TBAC rule, it based its requirements on the Department of 
Environment Protection's other air pollution control rules with similar 
reporting requirements, such as the Subchapter 21 ``Emission 
Statements'' rule. EPA suggests that the next time Subchapter 34 is 
revised, that the definition for ``ozone-season'' be clarified to refer 
to peak ozone season as used in Subchapter 21. In the meantime, should 
there be any confusion with the term ozone-season, users should use the 
definition in Subchapter 21 ``Emission Statements'' and as used 
specifically in Subchapter 21.5(f). With this clarification, Subchapter 
34 addresses all EPA requirements necessary to account for TBAC 
emissions. EPA is proposing to approve this rule.

V. What other rules are affected by the VOC definition change and EPA's 
evaluation?

A. What other rules include the VOC definition change?

    The term VOC is used in several other New Jersey regulations:

``Subchapter 8, Permits and Certificates for Minor Facilities (and 
Major Facilities without an Operating Permit);''
``Subchapter 16, Control and Prohibition of Air Pollution by Volatile 
Organic Compounds;''
``Subchapter 17, Control and Prohibition of Air Pollution By Toxic 
Substances;''
``Subchapter 18, Control and Prohibition of Air Pollution from New or 
Altered Sources Affecting Ambient Air Quality (Emission Offset Rule);''
``Subchapter 19, Control and Prohibition of Air Pollution From Oxides 
of Nitrogen;''
``Subchapter 21, Emission Statements;''
``Subchapter 22, Operating Permits;''
``Subchapter 23, Prevention of Air Pollution From Architectural 
Coatings;'' and
``Subchapter 25, Control and Prohibition of Air Pollution by Vehicular 
Fuels.''

    These rules have been amended to include the revised definition of 
VOC that addresses the TBAC requirements.

B. What is EPA's evaluation?

    EPA has evaluated New Jersey's revised VOC definition for 
consistency with the Act, EPA regulations, and EPA policy. The revised 
definition of VOC as used in the above rules is consistent with EPA's 
definition in 40 CFR 51.100(s).
    At this time EPA is only proposing to approve as part of the SIP 
``Subchapter 23, Prevention of Air Pollution From Architectural 
Coatings,'' and ``Subchapter 25, Control and Prohibition of Air 
Pollution by Vehicular Fuels.'' Subchapters 16, 19, and 21 were 
proposed for approval as part of the SIP on April 23, 2010 (78 FR 
21197). Subchapter 22 is not part of the SIP. EPA will act on the other 
rules in a separate Federal Register at a later date.

VI. What action is EPA proposing?

    These new and revised rules will strengthen the SIP by providing 
additional VOC emission reductions and fulfilling commitments New 
Jersey made in its 8-hour Ozone Attainment Demonstration SIP (1997 
standard) to adopt these rules. EPA is proposing to approve 
``Subchapter 23, Prevention of Air Pollution From Architectural 
Coatings,'' ``Subchapter 24, Prevention of Air Pollution From Consumer 
Products,'' ``Subchapter 25, Control and Prohibition of Air Pollution 
by Vehicular Fuels,'' ``Subchapter 26, Prevention of Air Pollution From 
Adhesives, Sealants, Adhesive Primers and Sealant Primers,'' and 
``Subchapter 34, TBAC Emissions Reporting,'' of title 7, chapter 27 of 
the New Jersey Administrative Codes. While the changes made to the VOC 
definition in the other rules included in this SIP revision are also 
acceptable, EPA will act on those rules in separate Federal Register at 
a later date.
    EPA is also proposing to fully approve New Jersey's RACT analysis 
as New Jersey has fulfilled its commitment to adopt the identified RACT 
rules, the last of which are being proposed for approval in this 
action. These revisions meet the requirements of the Act and EPA's 
regulations, and are consistent with EPA's guidance and policy. EPA is 
taking this action pursuant to section 110 and part D of the Act and 
EPA's regulations.

VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a 
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and 
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described

[[Page 42676]]

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as 
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), 
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in 
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct 
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental 
relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 
organic compounds.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: July 12, 2010.
Judith A. Enck,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
[FR Doc. 2010-17949 Filed 7-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P