Document ID: EPA-R04-OAR-2009-0140-0015
Agency: epa
Document Type: Proposed Rule
Title: Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Approvals and Promulgations: North Carolina; Control Techniques Guidelines and Reasonably Available Control Technology
Posted Date: 2013-06-07T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 110 (Friday, June 7, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34306-34309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13574]

[[Page 34306]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2009-0140; FRL-9821-9]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans: 
North Carolina; Control Techniques Guidelines and Reasonably Available 
Control Technology

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On May 1, 2013, the State of North Carolina, through the North 
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NC DENR), 
submitted to EPA a state implementation plan (SIP) revision to satisfy 
North Carolina's commitment associated with the conditional approval of 
its reasonably available control technology (RACT) requirements for 
volatile organic compound (VOC) sources located in the North Carolina 
portion of the Charlotte--Gastonia--Rock Hill, North Carolina--South 
Carolina 1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment area (hereafter referred to as 
the ``bi-state Charlotte Area''). NC DENR's May 1, 2013, SIP revision 
also includes additional changes to North Carolina's RACT rules. EPA is 
proposing to approve these SIP revisions to the State's RACT rules and 
to convert the existing conditional approval of VOC RACT provisions in 
the North Carolina SIP to a full approval under the Clean Air Act (CAA 
or Act). EPA has evaluated the proposed changes to North Carolina's 
SIP, and has made the preliminary determination that they are 
consistent with statutory and regulatory requirements and EPA guidance.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 8, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2009-0140 by one of the following methods:
    1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for 
submitting comments.
    2. Email: R4-RDS@epa.gov.
    3. Fax: (404) 562-9019.
    4. Mail: ``EPA-R04-OAR-2009-0140'' Regulatory Development Section, 
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
    5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae Benjamin, Chief, Regulatory 
Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 
Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 
Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Such deliveries are 
only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation. 
The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through 
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. ``EPA-R04-OAR-
2009-0140.'' EPA's policy is that all comments received will be 
included in the public docket without change and may be made available 
online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information 
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through 
www.regulations.gov or email, information that you consider to be CBI 
or otherwise protected. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an 
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your 
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of 
your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without 
going through www.regulations.gov, your email address will be 
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is 
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you 
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name 
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any 
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to 
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA 
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid 
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of 
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public 
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the 
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some 
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information 
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such 
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be 
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket 
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or 
in hard copy at the Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning 
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official 
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding 
federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane Spann, Regulatory Development 
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management 
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth 
Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Ms. Spann may be reached by 
phone at (404) 562-9029, or via electronic mail at spann.jane@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. EPA's Analysis of North Carolina's May 1, 2013, SIP Revision
III. Proposed Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    On April 30, 2004, EPA designated the bi-state Charlotte Area as a 
moderate nonattainment area with respect to the 1997 8-hour ozone 
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). See 69 FR 23858. The 
bi-state Charlotte Area includes six full counties and one partial 
county in North Carolina and one partial county in South Carolina. The 
South Carolina portion of the bi-state Charlotte Area consists of the 
portion of York County, South Carolina that falls within the Rock Hill-
Fort Mill Area Transportation Study Metropolitan Planning Organization 
Area. The North Carolina portion of the bi-state Charlotte Area 
consists of Cabarrus, Gaston, Lincoln, Mecklenburg, Rowan, Union and a 
portion of Iredell County which includes Davidson and Coddle Creek 
Townships.1 2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Effective July 20, 2012, EPA designated one full county and 
six partial counties in the Charlotte metropolitan area as a 
marginal nonattainment area for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Today's 
proposed action regarding RACT is not related to requirements for 
the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
    \2\ Portions of the bi-state Charlotte Area were designated as a 
moderate nonattainment area for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS. The area was 
subsequently redesignated to attainment for the 1-hour ozone 
standard and a maintenance plan was approved into the North Carolina 
SIP. The original Charlotte--Gastonia, North Carolina 1-hour severe 
ozone nonattainment area consisted of Mecklenburg County and Gaston 
County, North Carolina. Today's proposed action regarding RACT is 
not related to requirements for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 34307]]

    As a result of this designation, North Carolina and South Carolina 
were required to amend their SIPs for their respective portions of the 
bi-state Charlotte Area to satisfy the requirements of section 182 of 
the CAA. Today's action specifically addresses the North Carolina 
portion of the bi-state Charlotte Area. EPA approved the RACT 
requirements for the South Carolina portion of the bi-state Charlotte 
Area on November 28, 2011, at 76 FR 72844.
    Section 182(b)(2) of the CAA requires states to adopt RACT rules 
for all areas designated nonattainment for ozone and classified as 
moderate or above. The three parts of the section 182(b)(2) RACT 
requirements are: (1) RACT for sources covered by an existing CTG 
(i.e., a CTG \3\ issued prior to enactment of the 1990 amendments to 
the CAA); (2) RACT for sources covered by a post-enactment CTG; and (3) 
all major sources not covered by a CTG (i.e., non-CTG sources). 
Pursuant to 40 CFR 51.165, a major source for a moderate ozone area is 
a source that emits 100 tons per year or more of VOC or nitrogen oxides 
(NOX).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ A CTG is a guidance document issued by EPA which, as a 
result of CAA section 182(b)(2), triggers a responsibility for 
states to submit, as part of their SIPs, RACT rules for stationary 
sources of VOC that are covered by the CTG. See 78 FR 15895.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On May 9, 2013, EPA took final action to approve, in part, and 
conditionally approve in part, North Carolina SIP revisions submitted 
on October 14, 2004, April 6, 2007, June 15, 2007, January 31, 2008, 
November 19, 2008, September 18, 2009, February 3, 2010, April 6, 2010, 
and November 9, 2010, to address NOX RACT, VOC RACT and CTG 
requirements. Together, these SIP revisions established the RACT 
requirements for the major sources located in the North Carolina 
portion of the bi-state Charlotte Area. See 78 FR 27065.
    NC DENR submitted a SIP revision on May 1, 2013, to address 
deficiencies with the State's VOC RACT rules as identified in EPA's May 
9, 2013, conditional approval of North Carolina's VOC RACT rules.\4\ 
North Carolina's May 1, 2013, SIP revision also included changes to 
rule 15A NCAC 02D.0903 (hereafter ``.0903'').\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Although published on May 9, 2013, EPA's conditional 
approval final action was signed on April 29, 2013, prior to the 
Agency's receipt of the May 1, 2013, North Carolina submission to 
address the State's conditional approval commitments.
    \5\ A change to rule 15A NCAC 02Q.0102 (hereafter ``.0102'') is 
also included in the May 1, 2013, SIP revision. In today's 
rulemaking, EPA is not taking action on North Carolina's changes to 
rule .0102. EPA will contemplate action on these changes in a 
separate action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. EPA's Analysis of North Carolina's May 1, 2013, SIP Revision

    As described above, North Carolina revised its VOC regulations to 
address the deficiencies identified in EPA's May 9, 2013, conditional 
approval action. EPA's conditional approval was based on North Carolina 
finalizing their November 28, 2012, draft submittal, to correct 
deficiencies with the State's VOC RACT regulations. As previously 
mentioned, section 182(b)(2) of the CAA requires RACT for all sources 
addressed by a CTG issued by EPA in areas classified as moderate 
nonattainment for ozone. North Carolina's previous RACT applicability 
rule, 15A NCAC 02D.0902 (hereafter ``.0902''), however, applied only to 
facilities located in the Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC 8-hour ozone 
nonattainment area that have the potential to emit (PTE) greater than 
or equal to 100 tons of VOC per year. North Carolina's May 1, 2013, SIP 
revision corrects this deficiency by extending applicability to all VOC 
sources in the nonattainment area for all CTG source categories. In 
addition, North Carolina's May 1, 2013, SIP revision also addresses the 
conditional approval of rules 15A NCAC 02D.0909 (hereafter ``.0909''), 
15A NCAC 02D.0951 (hereafter ``.0951''), 15A NCAC 02D.0961 (hereafter 
``.0961''), and 15A NCAC 02D.0962 (hereafter ``.0962''). In today's 
action, EPA is proposing to approve North Carolina's changes to rules 
.0902, .0909, .0951, .0961, and .0962 as satisfying the deficiencies in 
the State's VOC RACT rules, and thus the Agency is also proposing to 
convert the May 9, 2013, conditional approval to a full approval for 
North Carolina VOC RACT rules.
    North Carolina's May 1, 2013, SIP revision also proposes updates to 
rules .0903 and .0102. In today's action, EPA is proposing to approve 
the changes to rule .0903. EPA will take action on rule .0102 in a 
separate action. Below is a summary of the changes to each rule being 
proposed for approval in today's action.

1. Rule .0902, ``Applicability''

    North Carolina originally adopted rule .0902 in 1979, amended it a 
number of times and submitted this rule to EPA for approval. The 
following table shows the dates that rule .0902 was submitted to EPA 
and approved into the federally-approved SIP for North Carolina.

 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Date of EPA       Federal Register
  Date state submitted to EPA          approval            Approval
------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 8, 1984...............  December 19, 1986..  51 FR 45468
January 7, 1994 and August 16,   August 1, 1997.....  62 FR 41277
 1996.
March 19, 1997.................  October 15, 1999...  64 FR 55879
July 28, 2000..................  August 27, 2001....  66 FR 34117
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On November 9, 2010, North Carolina revised rule .0902 again. On 
May 9, 2013, EPA conditionally approved the November 9, 2010, version 
of rule .0902. See 78 FR 27065. On May 1, 2013, North Carolina 
submitted a SIP revision correcting deficiencies for the rule as 
identified in EPA's May 9, 2013, conditional approval of this rule. 
Based on changes that North Carolina made to rule .0902 in a May 1, 
2013, SIP revision, EPA is proposing to convert its May 9, 2013, 
conditional approval of rule .0902 to a full approval.

2. Rule .0903, ``Recordkeeping: Reporting, Monitoring''

    North Carolina originally adopted rule .0903 in 1979, amended it a 
number of times and submitted this rule to EPA for approval on November 
8, 1984. EPA approved rule .0903 into the federally-approved North 
Carolina SIP on December 19, 1986, (51 FR 45468). The rule was amended 
again and submitted to EPA for SIP approval on April 16, 2001. EPA 
approved these amendments into the federally-approved North Carolina 
SIP on August 8, 2002 (67 FR 51461).
    Changes to rule .0903 were submitted to EPA on May 1, 2013. EPA is 
proposing to approve the changes to rule .0903 as submitted on May 1, 
2013.

[[Page 34308]]

3. Rule .0909, ``Compliance Schedules for Sources in Nonattainment 
Areas''

    Rule .0909 was changed a number of times and submitted to EPA for 
approval. It was revised to add compliance schedules for the facilities 
to comply with RACT requirements, became State effective on March 1, 
2007, and was submitted to EPA for approval on April 6, 2007. Rule 
.0909 was amended to add compliance schedules for the facilities to 
comply with RACT requirements should the bi-state Charlotte Area fail 
to attain the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS and as a result be reclassified 
as serious area for that NAAQS. This rule was State effective on July 
1, 2007, and was submitted to EPA for approval on January 31, 2008.
    Subsequently, rule .0909 was amended to remove the reference to 
Stage II vapor recovery at Rules 15A NCAC 02D.0953, ``Vapor Return 
Piping for Stage II Vapor Recovery,'' and 15A NCAC 02D.0954, ``Stage II 
Vapor Recovery,'' as these provisions were repealed by the State. This 
amendment became State effective on January 1, 2009, and submitted to 
EPA for approval on September 18, 2009. Additionally, rule .0909 was 
amended to change cross-references, became State effective on September 
1, 2010, and submitted to EPA for approval on November 9, 2010. On May 
9, 2013, EPA conditionally approved the November 9, 2010, version of 
rule .0909, which comprehensively addressed the above mentioned 
revisions to this rule. See 78 FR 27065. Specifically, EPA 
conditionally approved the rule .0909 revisions based upon the State's 
commitment to amend the rule to address RACT requirements for sources 
that emit less than 100 tpy of VOC. The State's amendment to address 
this deficiency in rule .0909 became State effective on May 1, 2013, 
and submitted to EPA for approval on May 1, 2013. Based on these 
changes to rule .0909 contained in the May 1, 2013, SIP revision, EPA 
is proposing to convert its May 9, 2013, conditional approval of rule 
.0909 to a full approval.

4. Rule .0951, ``RACT for Sources of Volatile Organic Compounds''

    North Carolina originally adopted rule .0951 in 1994 and submitted 
this rule for EPA approval on August 16, 1995. EPA approved the August 
16, 1995, submittal on August 1, 1997, at 62 FR 41277. Subsequently, 
North Carolina submitted rule .0951 amendments to EPA for approval into 
the federally-approved SIP on July 28, 2000. EPA approved these 
amendments on June 27, 2001, at 66 FR 34117. North Carolina again 
changed rule .0951 with a State effective date of September 1, 2010. 
The September 1, 2010, version of this rule was submitted to EPA on 
November 9, 2010, for SIP approval. Specifically, the rule was amended 
to change cross references to other Chapter 15A NCAC 02D.0900 rules.
    On May 9, 2013, EPA conditionally approved the November 9, 2010, 
version of rule .0951. See 78 FR 27065. On May 1, 2013, North Carolina 
submitted a SIP revision correcting deficiencies for the rule as 
identified in EPA's May 9, 2013, conditional approval of this rule. 
Based on these changes to rule .0951 in the May 1, 2013, SIP revision, 
EPA is proposing to convert its May 9, 2013, conditional approval of 
rule .0951 to a full approval. Additionally, EPA is proposing to 
approve a name change for rule .0951 as provided in North Carolina's 
May 1, 2013, SIP revision. Specifically, North Carolina changed the 
title of rule .0951 from ``Miscellaneous Volatile Organic Compound 
Emissions'' to ``RACT for Sources of Volatile Organic Compounds.''

5. Rule .0961, ``Offset Lithographic Printing and Letterpress 
Printing''

    In December 1978, EPA published a CTG for graphic arts (rotogravure 
printing and flexographic printing) that included flexible packaging 
printing. On October 5, 2006 (71 FR 58745), EPA updated the 1978 CTG, 
as part of Group II CTG, addressing the control of VOC emissions from 
graphic arts systems consisting of packaging rotogravure, publication 
rotogravure or flexographic printing operations.
    North Carolina originally adopted Rule 15A NCAC 02D.0936 (hereafter 
``.0936''), ``Graphic Arts'' in 1980, amended it, and then submitted it 
to EPA for approval on April 17, 1990. It was approved into the 
federally-approved North Carolina SIP on June 23, 1994 (59 FR 32362). 
In a November 9, 2010, SIP revision North Carolina repealed rule .0936, 
``Graphic Arts'' and replaced it in part with rule .0961, ``Offset 
Lithographic Printing and Letterpress Printing.'' See 78 FR 15895, 
March 13, 2013, for more information regarding rule .0936, ``Graphic 
Arts.''
    On May 9, 2013, EPA conditionally approved the November 9, 2010, 
version of rule .0961. See 78 FR 27065. On May 1, 2013, North Carolina 
submitted a SIP revision correcting deficiencies for the rule as 
identified in EPA's May 9, 2013, conditional approval of this rule. 
Based on these changes to rule .0961 in the May 1, 2013, SIP revision, 
EPA is proposing to convert its May 9, 2013, conditional approval of 
rule .0961 to a full approval.

6. Rule .0962, ``Industrial Cleaning Solvents''

    On October 5, 2006 (71 FR 58745), as part of the Group II CTG, EPA 
updated the portion of the 1977 Solvent Metal Cleaning CTG regarding 
the control of VOC emissions from the use of industrial cleaning 
solvents. North Carolina originally adopted rule .0962, on September 1, 
2010, and submitted this rule to EPA for approval into the federally-
approved North Carolina SIP on November 9, 2010. Rule .0962 was amended 
again, and submitted for EPA approval on May 1, 2013.
    On May 9, 2013, EPA conditionally approved the November 9, 2010, 
version of rule .0962. See 78 FR 27065. On May 1, 2013, North Carolina 
submitted a SIP revision correcting deficiencies for the rule as 
identified in EPA's May 9, 2013, conditional approval of this rule. 
Based on these changes to rule .0962 in the May 1, 2013, SIP revision, 
EPA is proposing to convert its May 9, 2013, conditional approval of 
rule .0962 to a full approval.

III. Proposed Action

    Pursuant to section 110 of the CAA, EPA is proposing to approve the 
changes to North Carolina's SIP to address deficiencies with the 
State's VOC RACT rules at .0902, .0909, .0951, .0961, and .0962 for the 
North Carolina portion of the bi-state Charlotte Area as provided in a 
May 1, 2013, SIP revision. EPA has evaluated North Carolina's May 1, 
2013, SIP revision, and has preliminarily determined that the changes 
to rules .0902, .0909, .0951, .0961, and .0962 meet the applicable 
requirements of the CAA and EPA regulations addressing VOC RACT 
requirements. As a result, EPA is also proposing to convert a May 9, 
2013, conditional approval of rules .0902, .0909, .0951, .0961, and 
.0962, at 78 FR 27065, to a full approval.
    Additionally, in today's action, EPA is proposing to approve 
changes to North Carolina's rule .0903, ``Recordkeeping: Reporting, 
Monitoring,'' and to approve the name change for rule .0951 from 
``Miscellaneous Volatile Organic Compound Emissions'' to ``RACT for 
Sources of Volatile Organic Compounds,'' as provided in SIP revision on 
May 1, 2013. EPA has made the preliminary determination that North 
Carolina's changes are consistent with the CAA and EPA's regulations.

[[Page 34309]]

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable 
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposal action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

In addition, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications as 
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), 
because the determination does not have substantial direct effects on 
an Indian Tribe. There are no Indian Tribes located within the North 
Carolina portion of the bi-state Charlotte nonattainment area.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: May 30, 2013.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2013-13574 Filed 6-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P