Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0051-1169
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2023-08-16T04:00Z

From:
"Ford, Luke" <lford@primaryenergy.com>
Sent:
Thu, 27 Apr 2023 08:53:00 
To:
Coke ICR2 <Coke.ICR2@rti.org>
Subject:
RE: Cokenergy 114 Request Report

The updated report is attached for the stack testing completed at Cokenergy in response to the CAA 114 request is attached.  Due to the size of the file, we have broken the document into ten separate files.  We will submit the ERT and the spreadsheet separately.
 
If there are any questions, please let me know.
 
Regards,
 
Luke Ford
Director EH&S
Primary Energy 
3210 Watling St.
MC 2-991
East Chicago, IN 46312
Desk  -  (219) 397-4626
Cell  -  (773) 447-8257
lford@primaryenergy.com 
 
 
From: Coke ICR2 <Coke.ICR2@rti.org> 
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2023 12:53 PM
To: Ford, Luke <lford@primaryenergy.com>; Coke ICR2 <Coke.ICR2@rti.org>Cc: Jones, DonnaLee <jones.donnalee@epa.gov>; Mcginn, Kevin <mcginn.kevin@epa.gov>
Subject: RE: Cokenergy 114 Request Report

Hello Luke,
 
They you again for providing the stack testing report for Cokenergy.
 
We were able to do a preliminary review of the report and had a few comments.
 
-The laboratory should not be using a mass value of zero for runs/analyte fractions that are BDL.
The Enclosure 2 document describes how the reported value must assume that the analyte is present at the full BDL value.
 
-Please make sure to report dioxin/furans as TEQ as required by 114 request. 
 
-For Method 5, the first page of the summary pages in the lab report for method 5 are missing (M5 summary begins with Runs 4 on page 134 of the pdf) the individual sample fractions have a detection limit, and that should be used and not zero in subsequent calculations.  If something occurred during sampling, recovery, or analysis that could be a reason to use an alternative procedure, that should be discussed in the report as an issue.
 
-PAH results are all listed as ADL, but perylene has 0.00 listed as the total mass collected as well as some runs for dibenzo (a,h) anthracene this appears to be the result of insufficient digits in the table as there are concentration results for these compounds
 
-The lab report for the OTM 46 samples appears to be missing from the report (p. 528-530 of the report are the only components of the analytical data present in the report), which in light of the above, is important in able to be able to evaluate the PAH data.
 
If you could please revise the report to resolve these issues that would be most appreciated.
 
If you have any questions or need more information, please let us know.
 
Thank you
Gabrielle