Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0005-0001
Agency: epa
Document Type: Proposed Rule
Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Surface Coating of Metal Cans.
Posted Date: 2003-01-15T05:00Z

Wednesday,

January
15,
2003
Part
II
Environmental
Protection
Agency
40
CFR
Part
63
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants:
Surface
Coating
of
Metal
Cans;
Proposed
Rule
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00001
Fmt
4717
Sfmt
4717
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2110
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
40
CFR
Part
63
[
FRL
 
7418
 
3]

RIN
2060
 
AG96
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants:
Surface
Coating
of
Metal
Cans
AGENCY:
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA).
ACTION:
Proposed
rule.

SUMMARY:
The
EPA
is
proposing
national
emission
standards
for
hazardous
air
pollutants
(
NESHAP)
for
metal
can
surface
coating
operations
pursuant
to
section
112(
d)
of
the
Clean
Air
Act
(
CAA).
The
EPA
estimates
that
there
are
approximately
142
major
source
facilities
in
the
metal
can
surface
coating
source
category
that
emit
hazardous
air
pollutants
(
HAP),
such
as
xylene,
hexane,
methyl
isobutyl
ketone
(
MIBK),
ethylene
glycol
monobutyl
ether
(
EGBE)
and
other
glycol
ethers,
isophorone,
ethyl
benzene,
formaldehyde,
napthalene,
methyl
ethyl
ketone
(
MEK),
cumene,
and
toluene.
As
proposed,
the
standards
are
estimated
to
reduce
HAP
emissions
by
6,160
megagrams
per
year
(
Mg/
yr)
(
6,800
tons
per
year
(
tpy))
or
by
71
percent.
The
reduction
in
HAP
emissions
would
be
achieved
by
requiring
all
major
sources
of
HAP
emissions
that
have
metal
can
surface
coating
operations
to
meet
the
HAP
emission
standards
reflecting
the
application
of
the
maximum
achievable
control
technology
(
MACT).
DATES:
Comments.
Submit
comments
on
or
before
February
14,
2003.
Public
Hearing.
If
anyone
contacts
the
EPA
requesting
to
speak
at
a
public
hearing,
they
should
do
so
by
January
27,
2003.
If
requested,
a
public
hearing
will
be
held
approximately
15
days
following
publication
of
this
notice
in
the
Federal
Register.
ADDRESSES:
Comments.
By
U.
S.
Postal
Service,
send
comments
(
in
duplicate
if
possible)
to:
Office
of
Air
&
Radiation
Docket
&
Information
Center
(
6102T),
Attention
Docket
Number
A
 
98
 
41,
U.
S.
EPA,
1301
Constitution
Avenue,
NW.,
Room
B108,
Washington,
DC
20460.
In
person
or
by
courier,
deliver
comments
(
in
duplicate
if
possible)
to:
Air
and
Radiation
Docket
and
Information
Center,
Attention
Docket
Number
A
 
98
 
41,
U.
S.
EPA,
1301
Constitution
Avenue,
NW.,
Room
B108,
Washington,
DC
20460.
The
EPA
requests
a
separate
copy
also
be
sent
to
the
contact
person
listed
in
FOR
FURTHER
INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Public
Hearing.
If
a
public
hearing
is
held,
it
will
be
held
at
the
new
EPA
facility
complex
in
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC.
You
should
contact
Ms.
Janet
Eck,
Coatings
and
Consumer
Product
Group,
Emission
Standards
Division
(
C539
 
03),
U.
S.
EPA,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC
27711,
telephone
number
(
919)
541
 
7946,
to
request
to
speak
at
the
public
hearing
or
to
find
out
if
a
hearing
will
be
held.
Docket.
Docket
No.
A
 
98
 
41
contains
supporting
information
used
in
developing
the
proposed
standards.
The
docket
is
located
at
the
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Office
of
Air
&
Radiation
Docket
&
Information
Center
(
6102T),
1301
Constitution
Avenue,
NW.,
Room
B108,
Washington,
DC
20460,
and
may
be
inspected
from
8:
30
a.
m.
to
5:
30
p.
m.,
Monday
through
Friday,
excluding
legal
holidays.

FOR
FURTHER
INFORMATION
CONTACT:
Mr.
Paul
Almo
´
dovar,
Coatings
and
Consumer
Products
Group,
Emissions
Standards
Division
(
C539
 
03),
U.
S.
EPA,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC
27711;
telephone
number
(
919)
541
 
0283;
facsimile
number
(
919)
541
 
5689;
electronic
mail
(
e­
mail)
address:
almodovar.
paul@.
epa.
gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION:
Comments.
Comments
and
data
may
be
submitted
by
e­
mail
to:
a­
and­
rdocket
epa.
gov.
Electronic
comments
must
be
submitted
as
an
ASCII
file
to
avoid
the
use
of
special
characters
and
encryption
problems
and
will
also
be
accepted
on
disks
in
WordPerfect
 
file
format.
All
comments
and
data
submitted
in
electronic
form
must
note
the
docket
number:
A
 
98
 
41.
No
confidential
business
information
(
CBI)
should
be
submitted
by
e­
mail.
Electronic
comments
may
be
filed
online
at
many
Federal
Depository
Libraries.
Commenters
wishing
to
submit
proprietary
information
for
consideration
must
clearly
distinguish
such
information
from
other
comments
and
clearly
label
it
as
CBI.
Send
submissions
containing
such
proprietary
information
directly
to
the
following
address,
and
not
to
the
public
docket,
to
ensure
that
proprietary
information
is
not
inadvertently
placed
in
the
docket:
Mr.
Paul
Almo
´
dovar,
c/
o
OAQPS
Document
Control
Officer
(
C404
 
02),
U.
S.
EPA,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC
27711.
The
EPA
will
disclose
information
identified
as
CBI
only
to
the
extent
allowed
by
the
procedures
set
forth
in
40
CFR
part
2.
If
no
claim
of
confidentiality
accompanies
a
submission
when
it
is
received
by
EPA,
the
information
may
be
made
available
to
the
public
without
further
notice
to
the
commenter.
Public
Hearing.
Persons
interested
in
presenting
oral
testimony
or
inquiring
as
to
whether
a
hearing
is
to
be
held
should
contact
Ms.
Janet
Eck,
Coatings
and
Consumer
Products
Group,
Emission
Standards
Division
(
C539
 
03),
U.
S.
EPA,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC
27711;
telephone
number
(
919)
541
 
7946
at
least
2
days
in
advance
of
the
public
hearing.
Persons
interested
in
attending
the
public
hearing
should
also
contact
Ms.
Eck
at
least
2
days
in
advance
of
the
public
hearing
to
verify
the
time,
date,
and
location
of
the
hearing.
The
public
hearing
will
provide
interested
parties
the
opportunity
to
present
data,
views,
or
arguments
concerning
these
proposed
emission
standards.
Docket.
The
docket
is
an
organized
and
complete
file
of
all
the
information
considered
by
EPA
in
the
development
of
the
proposed
rule.
The
docket
is
a
dynamic
file
because
material
is
added
throughout
the
rulemaking
process.
The
docketing
system
is
intended
to
allow
members
of
the
public
and
industries
involved
to
readily
identify
and
locate
documents
so
that
they
can
effectively
participate
in
the
rulemaking
process.
Along
with
the
proposed
and
promulgated
standards
and
their
preambles,
the
contents
of
the
docket
will
serve
as
the
record
in
the
case
of
judicial
review.
(
See
section
307(
d)(
7)(
A)
of
the
CAA.)
The
regulatory
text
and
other
materials
related
to
the
rulemaking
are
available
for
review
in
the
docket
or
copies
may
be
mailed
on
request
from
the
Air
and
Radiation
Docket
and
Information
Center
by
calling
(
202)
260
 
7548.
A
reasonable
fee
may
be
charged
for
copying
docket
materials.
World
Wide
Web
(
WWW).
In
addition
to
being
available
in
the
docket,
an
electronic
copy
of
the
proposed
rule
will
also
be
available
on
the
WWW
through
the
Technology
Transfer
Network
(
TTN).
Following
signature
by
the
Administrator,
a
copy
of
the
proposed
rule
will
be
posted
on
the
TTN's
policy
and
guidance
page
for
newly
proposed
or
promulgated
rules
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
ttn/
oarpg.
The
TTN
provides
information
and
technology
exchange
in
various
areas
of
air
pollution
control.
If
more
information
regarding
the
TTN
is
needed,
call
the
TTN
HELP
line
at
(
919)
541
 
5384.
Regulated
Entities.
The
proposed
source
category
definition
includes
facilities
that
apply
surface
coatings
to
metal
cans
and
ends
(
including
decorative
tins)
or
metal
crowns
and
closures.
In
general,
facilities
that
apply
surface
coatings
to
metal
cans
are
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00002
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2111
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
covered
under
the
North
American
Industrial
Classification
System
(
NAICS)
codes
listed
in
Table
1.
However,
facilities
classified
under
other
NAICS
codes
may
be
subject
to
the
proposed
rule
if
they
meet
the
applicability
criteria.
The
table
is
not
intended
to
be
exhaustive,
but
rather
provides
a
guide
for
readers
regarding
subcategories
and
entities
likely
to
be
regulated
by
today's
action.
To
determine
whether
your
coating
operation
is
regulated
by
this
action,
you
should
examine
the
applicability
criteria
in
40
CFR
63.3481
of
the
proposed
rule.
If
you
have
any
questions
regarding
the
applicability
of
today's
action
to
a
particular
entity,
consult
the
person
listed
in
the
preceding
FOR
FURTHER
INFORMATION
CONTACT
section.

TABLE
1.
 
SUBCATEGORIES
AND
ENTITIES
POTENTIALLY
REGULATED
BY
THE
PROPOSED
STANDARDS
Subcategory
NAICS
Examples
of
Potentially
Regulated
Entities
One­
and
two­
piece
draw
and
iron
(
D&
I)
can
body
coatings.
332431
Two­
piece
beverage
can
facility
Sheetcoatings
..............................................
332431
332115
332116
332812
332999
Three­
piece
food
can
facility,
two­
piece
D&
I
facility,
one­
piece
aerosol
can
facility,
etc.

Three­
piece
can
assembly
coatings
...........
332431
Can
assembly
facility
End
lining
coatings
......................................
332431
332812
End
manufacturing
facilities
Background
Information
Document
and
Economic
Impact
Analysis.
The
Background
Information
Document
(
BID)
and
the
Economic
Impact
Analysis
(
EIA)
for
the
proposed
rule
may
be
obtained
from
the
TTN
WWW;
the
metal
can
manufacturing
(
surface
coating)
docket
(
A
 
98
 
41);
the
EPA
Library
(
267
 
01),
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC
27711,
telephone
(
919)
541
 
2777;
or
the
National
Technical
Information
Service,
5285
Port
Royal
Road,
Springfield,
VA
22161,
telephone
(
703)
487
 
4650.
Please
refer
to
``
Background
Information
Document
 
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
(
NESHAP)
for
the
Metal
Can
Manufacturing
(
Surface
Coating)
Industry''
(
EPA
 
453/
R
 
02
 
008)
and
the
``
Economic
Impact
Analysis
of
Metal
Can
MACT
Standards''
(
EPA
 
452/
R
 
02
 
005).
Outline.
The
information
presented
in
this
preamble
is
organized
as
follows:

I.
Background
A.
What
is
the
source
of
authority
for
development
of
NESHAP?
B.
What
criteria
are
used
in
the
development
of
NESHAP?
C.
What
impacts
do
cure
HAP
have
on
the
NESHAP?
D.
What
are
the
health
effects
associated
with
HAP
emissions
from
metal
can
surface
coating
operations?
II.
Summary
of
the
Proposed
Rule
A.
What
source
categories
and
subcategories
are
affected
by
the
proposed
rule?
B.
What
is
the
relationship
to
other
rules?
C.
What
are
the
primary
sources
of
emissions
and
what
are
the
regulated
pollutants?
D.
What
is
the
affected
source?
E.
What
are
the
emission
limits,
operating
limits,
and
work
practice
standards?
F.
When
must
I
comply
with
the
proposed
rule?
G.
What
are
the
testing
and
initial
compliance
requirements?
H.
What
are
the
continuous
compliance
requirements?
I.
What
are
the
notification,
recordkeeping,
and
reporting
requirements?
III.
Rationale
for
Selecting
Proposed
Standards
A.
How
did
we
select
the
source
category
and
subcategories?
B.
How
did
we
select
the
regulated
pollutants?
C.
How
did
we
select
the
affected
source?
D.
How
did
we
determine
the
basis
and
level
of
the
proposed
standards
for
new
or
reconstructed
affected
sources
and
existing
affected
sources?
E.
How
did
we
select
the
format
of
the
standards?
F.
How
did
we
select
the
testing
and
initial
compliance
requirements?
G.
How
did
we
select
the
continuous
compliance
requirements?
H.
How
did
we
select
the
test
methods
for
determining
compliance
with
the
emission
limits
using
add­
on
control
devices?
I.
How
did
we
select
notification,
recordkeeping,
and
reporting
requirements?
IV.
Summary
of
Environmental,
Energy,
and
Economic
Impacts
A.
What
are
the
air
impacts?
B.
What
are
the
cost
impacts?
C.
What
are
the
economic
impacts?
D.
What
are
the
non­
air
health,
environmental,
and
energy
impacts?
V.
Administrative
Requirements
A.
Executive
Order
12866,
Regulatory
Planning
and
Review
B.
Executive
Order
13045,
Protection
of
Children
from
Environmental
Health
Risks
and
Safety
Risks
C.
Executive
Order
13132,
Federalism
D.
Executive
Order
13175,
Consultation
and
Coordination
with
Indian
Tribal
Governments
E.
Executive
Order
13211,
Actions
Concerning
Regulations
that
Significantly
Affect
Energy
Supply,
Distribution,
or
Use
F.
Unfunded
Mandates
Reform
Act
of
1995
G.
Regulatory
Flexibility
Act
(
RFA),
as
Amended
by
the
Small
Business
Regulatory
Enforcement
Fairness
Act
of
1996
(
SBREFA),
5
U.
S.
C.
601,
et
seq.
H.
Paperwork
Reduction
Act
I.
National
Technology
Transfer
and
Advancement
Act
I.
Background
A.
What
Is
the
Source
of
Authority
for
Development
of
NESHAP?
Section
112
of
the
CAA
requires
us
to
list
categories
and
subcategories
of
major
sources
and
area
sources
of
HAP
and
to
establish
NESHAP
for
the
listed
source
categories
and
subcategories.
The
metal
can
surface
coating
source
category
was
listed
on
July
16,
1992
(
57
FR
31576)
under
the
Surface
Coating
Processes
industry
group.
Major
sources
of
HAP
are
those
that
emit
or
have
the
potential
to
emit
equal
to
or
greater
than
9.1
Mg/
yr
(
10
tpy)
of
any
one
HAP
or
22.7
Mg/
yr
(
25
tpy)
of
any
combination
of
HAP.

B.
What
Criteria
Are
Used
in
the
Development
of
NESHAP?
Section
112
of
the
CAA
requires
that
we
establish
NESHAP
for
the
control
of
HAP
emissions
from
both
new
or
reconstructed
and
existing
major
sources.
The
CAA
requires
the
NESHAP
to
reflect
the
maximum
degree
of
reduction
in
emissions
of
HAP
that
is
achievable.
That
level
of
control
is
commonly
referred
to
as
the
MACT.
The
MACT
floor
is
the
minimum
control
level
allowed
for
NESHAP
and
is
defined
under
section
112(
d)(
3)
of
the
CAA.
In
essence,
the
MACT
floor
ensures
that
the
standard
is
set
at
a
level
that
assures
that
all
major
sources
achieve
the
level
of
control
at
least
as
stringent
as
that
already
achieved
by
the
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00003
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2112
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
better­
controlled
and
lower­
emitting
sources
in
each
source
category
or
subcategory.
For
new
or
reconstructed
sources,
the
MACT
floor
cannot
be
less
stringent
than
the
emission
control
that
is
achieved
in
practice
by
the
bestcontrolled
similar
source.
The
MACT
standards
for
existing
sources
can
be
less
stringent
than
standards
for
new
or
reconstructed
sources,
but
they
cannot
be
less
stringent
than
the
average
emission
limit
achieved
by
the
bestperforming
12
percent
of
existing
sources
in
the
category
or
subcategory
(
or
the
best­
performing
five
sources
for
categories
or
subcategories
with
fewer
than
30
sources).
In
developing
MACT,
we
also
consider
control
options
that
are
more
stringent
than
the
floor.
We
may
establish
standards
more
stringent
than
the
floor
based
on
the
consideration
of
the
cost
of
achieving
the
emissions
reductions,
any
non­
air
quality
health
and
environmental
impacts,
and
energy
requirements.

C.
What
Impacts
Do
Cure
HAP
Have
on
the
NESHAP?
Chemical
reactions
occurring
during
many
metal
can
surface
coating
and
curing
operations
may
create
compounds
that
are
then
emitted
into
the
atmosphere.
Those
types
of
compounds
are
normally
referred
to
as
``
cure
volatiles''
or
``
cure
HAP''
and
may
include
formaldehyde
and
methanol
(
listed
as
HAP
under
section
112(
b)
of
the
CAA).
In
determining
the
MACT,
we
did
not
quantify
emissions
of
cure
HAP
because
there
is
not
an
EPA­
approved
test
method
for
measuring
those
compounds.
Therefore,
the
proposed
rule
would
not
require
affected
sources
to
account
for
and
control
emissions
of
cure
HAP.

D.
What
Are
the
Health
Effects
Associated
With
HAP
Emissions
From
Metal
Can
Surface
Coating
Operations?
The
primary
HAP
emitted
from
metal
can
surface
coating
operations
include
EGBE
and
other
glycol
ethers,
xylenes,
hexane,
MEK,
and
MIBK.
Those
compounds
account
for
95
percent
of
the
nationwide
HAP
emissions
from
that
source
category.
Other
HAP
emitted
include
isophorone,
ethyl
benzene,
toluene,
trichloroethylene,
formaldehyde,
and
napthalene.
The
HAP
that
would
be
controlled
with
the
proposed
rule
are
associated
with
a
variety
of
adverse
health
effects.
Those
adverse
health
effects
include
chronic
health
disorders
(
e.
g.,
irritation
of
the
lungs,
eyes,
and
mucus
membranes
and
effects
on
the
central
nervous
system),
acute
health
disorders
(
e.
g.,
lung
irritation
and
congestion,
alimentary
effects
such
as
nausea
and
vomiting,
and
effects
on
the
central
nervous
system),
and
possibly
cancer.
We
do
not
have
the
type
of
current
detailed
data
on
each
of
the
facilities
covered
by
the
proposed
emission
standards
for
that
category
and
on
the
people
living
around
the
facilities
that
would
be
necessary
to
conduct
an
analysis
to
determine
the
actual
population
exposures
to
the
HAP
emitted
from
those
facilities
and
potential
for
resultant
health
effects.
Therefore,
we
do
not
know
the
extent
to
which
the
adverse
health
effects
described
above
occur
in
the
populations
surrounding
those
facilities.
However,
to
the
extent
that
adverse
effects
do
occur,
the
proposed
rule
would
reduce
emissions
and
subsequent
exposures.

II.
Summary
of
the
Proposed
Rule
A.
What
Source
Categories
and
Subcategories
Are
Affected
by
the
Proposed
Rule?

The
proposed
rule
would
apply
to
you
if
you
own
or
operate
a
metal
can
surface
coating
operation
that
uses
at
least
5,700
liters
(
1,500
gallons
(
gal))
of
coatings
per
year
and
is
a
major
source,
is
located
at
a
major
source,
or
is
part
of
a
major
source
of
HAP
emissions,
whether
or
not
you
manufacture
the
metal
can
substrate.
The
surface
coating
operations
themselves
are
not
required
to
be
major
sources
of
HAP
emissions
in
order
for
the
surface
coating
operations
at
a
major
source
facility
to
be
covered
by
the
proposed
rule.
As
long
as
some
part
of
the
total
facility
is
considered
a
major
source
(
e.
g.,
the
metal
can
substrate
manufacturing
process),
the
surface
coating
operations
would
be
subject
to
the
standards.
A
metal
can
surface
coating
facility
is
any
facility
that
coats
or
prints
metal
cans
or
ends
(
including
decorative
tins)
or
metal
crowns
or
closures
for
any
type
of
can
during
any
stage
of
the
can
manufacturing
process.
It
includes
the
coating/
printing
of
metal
sheets
for
subsequent
processing
into
cans
or
can
parts,
but
not
the
coating
of
metal
coils
for
cans
or
can
parts.
(
Coil
coating
for
cans
and
can
parts
is
included
in
the
metal
coil
surface
coating
source
category.)
Note
that
the
coating/
printing
of
pails
and
drums
falls
in
the
miscellaneous
metal
parts
and
products
surface
coating
source
category.
As
explained
later,
we
have
established
four
subcategories
in
the
metal
can
surface
coating
industry,
including:
(
1)
One­
and
two­
piece
D&
I
can
body
coating,
(
2)
sheetcoating,
(
3)
three­
piece
can
body
assembly
coating,
and
(
4)
end
lining.
Some
metal
can
surface
coating
facilities
include
coating
operations
in
more
than
one
subcategory.
In
those
cases,
the
facilities
would
be
subject
to
more
than
one
emission
limit.
You
would
not
be
subject
to
the
proposed
rule
if
your
coating
operation
is
located
at
an
area
source.
An
area
source
of
HAP
is
any
facility
that
has
the
potential
to
emit
HAP
but
is
not
a
major
source.
You
may
establish
area
source
status
by
limiting
the
source's
potential
to
emit
HAP
through
appropriate
mechanisms
available
through
the
permitting
authority.

B.
What
Is
the
Relationship
to
Other
Rules?
Affected
sources
subject
to
the
proposed
rule
may
also
be
subject
to
other
rules.
We
specifically
request
comments
on
how
monitoring,
recordkeeping,
and
reporting
requirements
can
be
consolidated
for
sources
that
are
subject
to
more
than
one
rule.
National
Emission
Standards
for
Metal
Coil
Surface
Coating.
Facilities
engaged
in
surface
coating
performed
on
a
continuous
metal
substrate
greater
than
0.006
inches
thick
would
be
subject
to
the
metal
coil
surface
coating
NESHAP
(
67
FR
39794,
June
10,
2002).
National
Emission
Standards
for
Miscellaneous
Metal
Parts
and
Products
Surface
Coating.
Surface
coating
of
any
metal
parts
and
products
not
covered
in
any
other
surface
coating
source
category,
such
as
metal
can
surface
coating
or
metal
coil
surface
coating,
would
be
subject
to
the
future
miscellaneous
metal
parts
and
products
surface
coating
NESHAP,
as
proposed
August
13,
2002
(
67
FR
52780).

C.
What
Are
the
Primary
Sources
of
Emissions
and
What
Are
the
Regulated
Pollutants?
HAP
Emission
Sources.
The
primary
HAP
emission
sources
in
metal
can
surface
coating
operations
are
coating
application
lines,
drying/
curing
ovens,
mixing
and/
or
thinning
areas,
and
cleaning
equipment.
Coating
application
lines
and
drying/
curing
ovens
are
the
largest
sources
of
HAP
emissions.
Recent
reformulation
efforts
involving
the
primary
coatings
used
in
metal
can
surface
coating
operations
are
likely
to
continue
as
a
result
of
the
proposed
rule
and
will
serve
to
reduce
HAP
emissions
from
these
sources.
Mixing
and/
or
thinning
areas
and
cleaning
equipment
are
smaller
HAP
emission
sources
and
work
practice
standards
would
be
used
to
limit
the
HAP
emissions
from
these
sources.
Organic
HAP.
Available
emission
data
collected
during
the
development
of
the
proposed
NESHAP
show
that
the
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00004
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2113
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
primary
organic
HAP
(
including
cure
HAP)
emitted
from
metal
can
surface
coating
operations
include
EGBE
and
other
glycol
ethers,
xylenes,
hexane,
MEK,
and
MIBK.
Other
significant
organic
HAP
identified
include
isophorone,
ethyl
benzene,
toluene,
trichloroethylene,
napthalene,
and
formaldehyde.
Organic
HAP
emissions
would
be
regulated
by
the
proposed
metal
can
surface
coating
rule.
Inorganic
HAP.
Based
on
information
reported
during
the
development
of
the
proposed
NESHAP,
inorganic
HAP,
including
chromium
and
manganese
compounds,
are
contained
in
some
of
the
coatings
used
by
that
source
category
and
may
be
emitted
if
they
are
spray­
applied.
Inorganic
HAP
emissions
would
not
be
regulated
by
the
proposed
metal
can
surface
coating
rule.
(
See
section
III.
B
of
this
preamble
for
further
discussion
of
inorganic
HAP
emissions
from
surface
coating
operations.)

D.
What
Is
the
Affected
Source?
We
define
an
affected
source
as
a
stationary
source,
group
of
stationary
sources,
or
part
of
a
stationary
source
to
which
a
specific
emission
standard
applies.
The
proposed
standards
for
metal
can
surface
coating
define
the
affected
source
for
each
subcategory
as
the
collection
of
all
operations
within
a
facility
associated
with
(
1)
one­
and
two­
piece
D&
I
can
body
coating,
(
2)
sheetcoating,
(
3)
three­
piece
can
body
assembly
coating,
or
(
4)
end
lining.
Those
operations
include
the
following:
Preparation
of
a
coating
for
application
(
e.
g.,
mixing
with
thinners);
process
equipment
involving
storage,
transfer,
handling,
and
application
of
coatings;
and
associated
curing,
and
drying
equipment.
The
affected
source
does
not
include
research
or
laboratory
equipment
or
janitorial,
building,
or
facility
maintenance
operations.

E.
What
Are
the
Emission
Limits,
Operating
Limits,
and
Work
Practice
Standards?
Emission
Limits.
We
are
proposing
to
limit
organic
HAP
emissions
from
each
new
or
reconstructed
affected
source
using
the
emission
limits
in
Table
2
of
this
preamble.
The
proposed
emission
limits
for
each
existing
affected
source
are
given
in
Table
3
of
this
preamble.
You
can
choose
from
several
compliance
options
in
the
proposed
rule
to
achieve
the
emission
limit
that
applies
to
your
affected
source.
You
could
comply
by
applying
materials
(
coatings
and
thinners)
that
meet
the
emission
limit,
either
individually
or
collectively.
You
could
also
use
a
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
equipment
to
meet
the
emission
limit.
You
could
also
comply
by
using
a
combination
of
both
approaches.
If
you
use
a
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
equipment,
there
are
alternative
control
efficiency
or
outlet
concentration
limits
that
you
may
use
to
simplify
and
reduce
your
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements.
The
alternative
emission
limits
for
affected
sources
using
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
compliance
option
are
provided
in
Table
4
of
this
preamble.

TABLE
2.
 
EMISSION
LIMITS
FOR
NEW
OR
RECONSTRUCTED
AFFECTED
SOURCES
If
you
apply
surface
coatings
to
metal
cans
or
metal
can
parts
in
this
subcategory
.
.
.
for
all
coatings
of
this
type
.
.
.
then,
you
must
meet
the
following
organic
HAP
emission
limit
in
kilograms
HAP/
liter
solids
(
pound
HAP/
gal
solids)
1:

1.
One­
and
two­
piece
D&
I
can
body
coating
....................
a.
two­
piece
beverage
cans
 
all
coatings
.........................
b.
two­
piece
food
cans
 
all
coatings
.................................
c.
one­
piece
aerosol
cans
 
all
coatings
............................
0.04
(
0.31)
0.06
(
0.50)
0.08
(
0.65)
2.
Sheetcoating
...................................................................
sheetcoating
.......................................................................
0.02
(
0.17)
3.
Three­
piece
can
assembly
.............................................
a.
inside
spray
....................................................................
b.
aseptic
side
seam
stripes
on
food
cans
........................
c.
non­
aseptic
side
seam
stripes
on
food
cans
.................
d.
side
seam
stripes
on
general
line
non­
food
cans
..........
e.
side
seam
stripes
on
aerosol
cans
................................
0.12
(
1.03)
1.48
(
12.37)
0.72
(
5.96)
1.18
(
9.84)
1.46
(
12.14)
4.
End
lining
........................................................................
a.
aseptic
end
seal
compounds
.........................................
b.
non­
aseptic
end
seal
compounds
..................................
0.06
(
0.54)
0.00
(
0.00)

1
If
you
apply
surface
coatings
of
more
than
one
type
within
any
one
subcategory,
you
may
calculate
an
overall
subcategory
emission
limit
(
OSEL)
according
to
40
CFR
63.3551(
i).

TABLE
3.
 
EMISSION
LIMITS
FOR
EXISTING
AFFECTED
SOURCES
If
you
apply
surface
coatings
to
metal
cans
or
metal
can
parts
in
this
subcategory
.
.
.
for
all
coatings
of
this
type
.
.
.
then,
you
must
meet
the
following
organic
HAP
emission
limit
in
kilogram
HAP/
liter
solids
(
pound
HAP/
gal
solids)
1:

1.
One­
and
two­
piece
D&
I
can
body
coating
...................
a.
two­
piece
beverage
cans
 
all
coatings
.........................
b.
two­
piece
food
cans
 
all
coatings
.................................
c.
one­
piece
aerosol
cans
 
all
coatings
............................
0.07
(
0.59)
0.06
(
0.51)
........................................
0.12
(
0.99)
2.
Sheetcoating
...................................................................
sheetcoating
.......................................................................
0.03
(
0.26)
3.
Three­
piece
can
assembly
.............................................
a.
inside
spray
....................................................................
b.
aseptic
side
seam
stripes
on
food
cans
........................
c.
non­
aseptic
side
seam
stripes
on
food
cans
.................
d.
side
seam
stripes
on
general
line
non­
food
cans
..........
e.
side
seam
stripes
on
aerosol
cans
................................
0.29
(
2.43)
1.94
(
16.16)
0.79
(
6.57)
1.18
(
9.84)
1.46
(
12.14)

VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00005
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2114
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
TABLE
3.
 
EMISSION
LIMITS
FOR
EXISTING
AFFECTED
SOURCES
 
Continued
If
you
apply
surface
coatings
to
metal
cans
or
metal
can
parts
in
this
subcategory
.
.
.
for
all
coatings
of
this
type
.
.
.
then,
you
must
meet
the
following
organic
HAP
emission
limit
in
kilogram
HAP/
liter
solids
(
pound
HAP/
gal
solids)
1:

4.
End
lining
........................................................................
a.
aseptic
end
seal
compounds
.........................................
b.
non­
aseptic
end
seal
compounds
..................................
0.06
(
0.54)
0.00
(
0.00)

1
If
you
apply
surface
coatings
of
more
than
one
type
within
any
one
subcategory
you
may
calculate
an
OSEL
according
to
40
CFR
63.3551(
i).

TABLE
4.
 
EMISSION
LIMITS
FOR
AFFECTED
SOURCES
USING
THE
CONTROL
EFFICIENCY/
OUTLET
CONCENTRATION
COMPLIANCE
OPTION
If
you
use
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option
to
comply
with
the
emission
limitations
for
any
coating
operation(
s)
Then
you
must
comply
with
one
of
the
following
by
using
an
emissions
control
system
to
1.
In
a
new
or
reconstructed
affected
source
..........................................
a.
reduce
emissions
of
total
HAP,
measured
as
total
hydrocarbons
(
THC)
(
as
carbon),
1
by
97
percent;
or
b.
limit
emissions
of
total
HAP,
measured
as
THC
(
as
carbon)
1
to
20
parts
per
million
by
volume,
dry
(
ppmvd)
at
the
control
device
outlet
and
use
a
permanent
total
enclosure.
2.
In
an
existing
affected
source
..............................................................
a.
reduce
emissions
of
total
HAP,
measured
as
THC
(
as
carbon),
1
by
95
percent;
or
b.
limit
emissions
of
total
HAP,
measured
as
THC
(
as
carbon),
1
to
20
ppmvd
at
the
control
device
outlet
and
use
a
PTE.

1
You
may
choose
to
subtract
methane
from
THC
as
carbon
measurements.

Operating
Limits.
If
you
reduce
emissions
by
using
a
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
(
other
than
a
solvent
recovery
system
for
which
you
conduct
a
liquid­
liquid
material
balance),
the
proposed
operating
limits
would
apply
to
you.
Those
limits
are
site­
specific
parameter
limits
you
determine
during
the
initial
performance
test
of
the
system.
For
capture
systems
that
are
not
permanent
total
enclosures
(
PTE),
you
would
establish
average
volumetric
flow
rates
or
duct
static
pressure
limits
for
each
capture
device
(
or
enclosure)
in
each
capture
system.
For
capture
systems
that
are
PTE,
you
would
establish
limits
on
average
facial
velocity
or
pressure
drop
across
openings
in
the
enclosure.
For
thermal
oxidizers,
you
would
monitor
the
combustion
temperature.
For
catalytic
oxidizers,
you
would
monitor
the
temperature
immediately
before
and
after
the
catalyst
bed
or
you
would
monitor
the
temperature
before
the
catalyst
bed
and
implement
a
sitespecific
inspection
and
maintenance
plan
for
the
catalytic
oxidizer.
For
carbon
adsorbers
for
which
you
do
not
conduct
a
liquid­
liquid
material
balance,
you
would
monitor
the
carbon
bed
temperature
and
the
amount
of
steam
or
nitrogen
used
to
desorb
the
bed.
For
condensers,
you
would
monitor
the
outlet
gas
temperature
from
the
condenser.
For
concentrators,
you
would
monitor
the
temperature
of
the
desorption
concentrate
stream
and
the
pressure
drop
of
the
dilute
stream
across
the
concentrator.
All
site­
specific
parameter
limits
that
you
establish
must
reflect
operation
of
the
capture
system
and
control
devices
during
a
performance
test
that
demonstrates
achievement
of
the
emission
limits
during
representative
operating
conditions.
Work
Practice
Standards.
In
lieu
of
emission
standards,
section
112(
h)
of
the
CAA
allows
work
practice
standards
or
other
requirements
to
be
established
when
a
pollutant
cannot
be
emitted
through
a
conveyance
or
capture
system,
or
when
measurement
is
not
practicable
because
of
technological
and
economic
limitations.
Many
metal
can
surface
coating
facilities
use
work
practice
measures
to
reduce
HAP
emissions
from
mixing,
cleaning,
storage,
and
waste
handling
areas
as
part
of
their
standard
operating
procedures.
They
use
those
measures
to
decrease
solvent
usage
and
minimize
exposure
to
workers.
However,
we
do
not
have
data
to
accurately
quantify
the
emissions
reductions
achievable
by
the
work
practice
measures,
and
it
is
not
feasible
to
measure
emissions
or
enforce
a
numerical
standard
for
emissions
from
those
operations.
Based
on
information
received
from
that
industry
during
the
development
of
NESHAP
and
information
available
from
several
similar
coating
industries
for
which
NESHAP
have
already
been
promulgated
(
aerospace
manufacturing
and
rework,
magnetic
tape
manufacturing,
shipbuilding
and
ship
repair,
and
wood
furniture
manufacturing),
we
identified
a
variety
of
work
practice
measures
for
cleaning,
storage,
mixing,
and
waste
handling.
If
you
reduce
emissions
by
using
a
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device,
you
would
be
required
to
develop
and
implement
a
work
practice
plan
that
would
specify
practices
and
procedures
to
ensure
that,
at
a
minimum,
the
elements
specified
below
are
implemented:
(
1)
Storing
all
organic­
HAP­
containing
liquids
and
waste
materials
in
closed
containers,
(
2)
minimizing
spills
of
all
organic­
HAPcontaining
materials,
(
3)
using
closed
containers
or
pipes
to
transport
all
organic­
HAP­
containing
materials,
(
4)
keeping
mixing
vessels
for
organic­
HAPcontaining
materials
closed
except
when
adding
to,
removing,
or
mixing
the
contents,
and
(
5)
minimizing
organic
HAP
emissions
during
all
cleaning
operations.
If
your
affected
source
has
an
existing
documented
plan
that
incorporates
steps
taken
to
minimize
emissions
from
the
aforementioned
sources,
then
your
existing
plan
could
be
used
to
satisfy
the
requirement
for
a
work
practice
plan.
Operations
During
Startup,
Shutdown,
or
Malfunction.
If
you
use
a
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
for
compliance,
you
would
be
required
to
develop
and
operate
according
to
a
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan
(
SSMP)
during
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00006
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2115
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
periods
of
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
of
the
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device.
General
Provisions.
The
General
Provisions
(
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
A)
also
would
apply
to
you
as
indicated
in
the
proposed
standards.
The
General
Provisions
codify
certain
procedures
and
criteria
for
all
40
CFR
part
63
NESHAP.
The
General
Provisions
contain
administrative
procedures,
preconstruction
review
procedures
for
new
sources,
and
procedures
for
conducting
compliance­
related
activities
such
as
notifications,
recordkeeping
and
reporting,
performance
testing,
and
monitoring.
The
proposed
standards
refer
to
individual
sections
of
the
General
Provisions
to
emphasize
key
sections
that
are
relevant.
However,
unless
specifically
overridden
in
the
proposed
standards,
all
of
the
applicable
General
Provisions
requirements
would
apply
to
you.

F.
When
Must
I
Comply
With
the
Proposed
Rule?
Existing
affected
sources
must
comply
within
3
years
of
[
DATE
OF
PUBLICATION
OF
THE
FINAL
RULE
IN
THE
Federal
Register].
New
or
reconstructed
affected
sources
must
comply
immediately
upon
initial
startup
or
on
[
DATE
OF
PUBLICATION
OF
THE
FINAL
RULE
IN
THE
Federal
Register],
whichever
is
later.
A
metal
can
surface
coating
affected
source
is
existing
if
its
construction
or
reconstruction
of
the
facility
commenced
on
or
before
January
15,
2003.
An
affected
source
is
new
if
construction
commenced
after
January
15,
2003.
A
metal
can
surface
coating
affected
source
is
reconstructed
if
it
meets
the
definition
of
reconstruction
in
40
CFR
63.2
and
reconstruction
is
commenced
after
January
15,
2003.
The
effective
date
is
[
DATE
OF
PUBLICATION
OF
THE
FINAL
RULE
IN
THE
Federal
Register].

G.
What
Are
the
Testing
and
Initial
Compliance
Requirements?
Initial
Compliance.
Compliance
with
the
emission
limits
is
based
on
a
12­
month
rolling
average.
Therefore,
for
new
or
reconstructed
affected
sources
using
the
compliant
materials
option
or
the
emission
rate
without
add­
on
controls
option,
the
proposed
initial
compliance
period
begins
on
the
first
day
of
the
first
month
following
initial
startup
of
the
affected
source
or
the
effective
date,
whichever
is
later,
and
ends
on
the
last
day
of
the
12th
month
following
initial
startup
or
the
effective
date,
whichever
is
later.
For
new
or
reconstructed
affected
sources
that
use
a
capture
system
and
control
device,
the
initial
compliance
period
begins
on
the
first
day
of
the
first
month
following
the
initial
performance
test
and
ends
on
the
last
day
of
the
12th
month
following
the
initial
performance
test.
For
all
new
or
reconstructed
affected
sources,
any
partial
month
data
between
initial
startup
or
initial
performance
test
and
initial
compliance
period
must
be
added
to
the
first
month
data.
For
existing
affected
sources,
the
proposed
initial
compliance
period
begins
on
the
first
day
of
the
month
in
which
the
compliance
date
falls
and
ends
on
the
last
day
of
the
12th
month
following
the
compliance
date.
Being
in
compliance
means
that
the
owner
or
operator
of
the
affected
source
meets
the
requirements
to
achieve
the
proposed
emission
limitations
by
the
end
of
the
initial
compliance
period.
At
the
end
of
the
initial
compliance
period,
the
owner
or
operator
would
use
the
data
and
records
generated
to
determine
whether
or
not
the
affected
source
is
in
compliance
with
the
12­
month
rolling
average
for
that
period.
If
the
affected
source
does
not
meet
the
applicable
limits
and
other
requirements,
it
is
out
of
compliance
for
the
entire
initial
compliance
period.
We
welcome
specific
comments
on
the
compliance
dates
and
the
data
collection
activities
required
for
the
initial
compliance
period.
Emission
Limits.
There
are
several
proposed
options
for
complying
with
the
proposed
emission
limits,
and
the
testing
and
initial
compliance
requirements
vary
accordingly.
Option
1:
Compliance
Based
on
the
Compliant
Material
Option.
If
you
demonstrate
compliance
based
on
the
compliant
material
option,
you
would
determine
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
all
coatings
and
thinners
used
each
month
during
the
initial
compliance
period
and
the
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids
in
all
coatings
used
each
month
during
the
initial
compliance
period.
To
determine
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
coatings
and
thinners
and
the
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids,
you
could
use
either
manufacturer's
data
or
test
results
using
the
test
methods
listed
below.
You
may
use
alternative
test
methods
provided
you
get
EPA
approval
in
accordance
with
40
CFR
63.7(
f).
However,
if
there
is
any
inconsistency
between
the
test
method
results
(
either
EPA's
or
an
approved
alternative)
and
manufacturer's
data,
the
test
method
results
would
prevail
for
compliance
and
enforcement
purposes.
 
For
organic
HAP
content,
use
Method
311
of
40
CFR
part
63,
appendix
A.
 
The
proposed
rule
allows
you
to
use
nonaqueous
volatile
matter
as
a
surrogate
for
organic
HAP.
If
you
choose
that
option,
then
use
Method
24
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A,
to
determine
nonaqueous
volatile
matter.
 
For
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids,
use
either
information
from
the
supplier
or
manufacturer
of
the
material,
ASTM
Method
D2697
 
86(
1998),
or
ASTM
Method
D6093
 
97.
To
demonstrate
initial
compliance
based
on
the
compliant
materials
option,
you
would
be
required
to
demonstrate
that
the
organic
HAP
content
of
each
coating
meets
the
applicable
emission
limits
and
that
you
use
no
organic­
HAP­
containing
thinners.
Option
2:
Compliance
Based
on
the
Emission
Rate
Without
Add­
On
Controls
Option.
If
you
demonstrate
compliance
based
on
the
emission
rate
without
add­
on
controls
option,
you
would
determine
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
all
coatings
and
thinners
used
in
each
coating
type
segment
each
month
during
the
initial
compliance
period
and
the
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids
in
all
coatings
in
each
coating
type
segment
used
each
month
during
the
initial
compliance
period.
To
determine
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
coatings
and
thinners
and
the
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids,
you
could
use
either
manufacturer's
data
or
test
results
using
the
test
methods
listed
below.
You
may
use
alternative
test
methods
provided
you
get
EPA
approval
in
accordance
with
40
CFR
63.7(
f).
However,
if
there
is
any
inconsistency
between
the
test
method
results
(
either
EPA's
or
an
approved
alternative)
and
manufacturer's
data,
the
test
method
results
would
prevail
for
compliance
and
enforcement
purposes.
 
For
organic
HAP
content,
use
Method
311.
 
The
proposed
rule
allows
you
to
use
nonaqueous
volatile
matter
as
a
surrogate
for
organic
HAP.
If
you
choose
that
option,
use
Method
24
to
determine
nonaqueous
volatile
matter.
 
For
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids,
use
either
information
from
the
supplier
or
manufacturer
of
the
material,
ASTM
Method
D2697
 
86(
1998),
or
ASTM
Method
D6093
 
97.
To
demonstrate
initial
compliance
based
on
the
emission
rate
without
addon
controls
option,
you
would
be
required
to
demonstrate
that
the
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
all
coatings
and
thinners
in
each
coating
type
segment
divided
by
the
total
volume
of
coating
solids
in
that
coating
type
segment
meets
the
applicable
emission
limit.
For
the
emission
rate
without
add­
on
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00007
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2116
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
controls
option,
you
would
be
required
to
perform
the
following.
 
Determine
the
quantity
of
each
coating
and
thinner
used
in
each
coating
type
segment.
 
Determine
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
each
coating
and
thinner
in
each
coating
type
segment.
 
Determine
the
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids
for
each
coating
in
each
coating
type
segment.
 
Calculate
the
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
all
materials
in
each
coating
type
segment
and
total
volume
of
coating
solids
in
each
coating
type
segment
for
each
month
of
the
initial
compliance
period.
You
may
subtract
from
the
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
the
amount
contained
in
waste
materials
you
send
to
a
hazardous
waste
treatment,
storage,
and
disposal
facility
regulated
under
40
CFR
part
262,
264,
265,
or
266.
 
Calculate
the
ratio
of
the
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
for
the
materials
used
in
each
coating
type
segment
to
the
total
volume
of
coating
solids
used
in
the
segment.
 
Record
the
calculations
and
results
and
include
them
in
your
Notification
of
Compliance
Status.
Alternatively,
if
you
apply
coatings
in
more
than
one
coating
type
segment
within
a
subcategory,
you
may
calculate
an
overall
HAP
emission
limit
for
the
subcategory
and
demonstrate
compliance
by
including
all
coatings
and
thinners
in
all
coating
type
segments
in
the
subcategory
in
calculating
the
ratio
of
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
to
total
volume
of
coating
solids.
If
you
use
that
approach,
you
must
use
the
subcategory
limit
throughout
the
12­
month
initial
compliance
period
and
may
not
switch
between
compliance
with
limits
for
individual
coating
type
segments
and
an
overall
limit.
You
may
not
include
coatings
in
different
subcategories
in
determining
your
overall
HAP
limit
by
that
approach.
Option
3:
Compliance
Based
on
the
Emission
Rate
With
Add­
On
Controls
Option.
If
you
use
a
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
other
than
a
solvent
recovery
system
for
which
you
conduct
a
liquid­
liquid
material
balance,
your
testing
and
initial
compliance
requirements
are
as
follows.
 
Conduct
an
initial
performance
test
to
determine
the
capture
and
control
efficiencies
of
the
equipment
and
to
establish
operating
limits
to
be
achieved
on
a
continuous
basis.
 
Determine
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
each
material
and
the
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids
for
each
coating
used
each
month
of
the
initial
compliance
period.
 
Calculate
the
organic
HAP
emissions
from
the
controlled
coating
operations
using
the
capture
and
control
efficiencies
determined
during
the
performance
test
and
the
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
materials
used
in
controlled
coating
operations.
 
Calculate
the
ratio
of
the
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions
to
the
total
volume
of
coating
solids
used
each
month
of
the
initial
compliance
period.
 
Record
the
calculations
and
results
and
include
them
in
the
Notification
of
Compliance
Status.
If
you
use
a
capture
system
and
addon
control
device,
other
than
a
solvent
recovery
system
for
which
you
conduct
liquid­
liquid
material
balances,
you
would
determine
both
the
efficiency
of
the
capture
system
and
the
emissions
reduction
efficiency
of
the
control
device.
To
determine
the
capture
efficiency,
you
would
either
verify
the
presence
of
a
PTE
using
EPA
Method
204
of
40
CFR
part
51,
appendix
M,
or
use
one
of
the
protocols
in
40
CFR
63.3565
to
measure
capture
efficiency.
If
you
have
a
PTE
and
all
the
materials
are
applied
and
dried
within
the
enclosure
and
you
route
all
exhaust
gases
from
the
enclosure
to
a
control
device,
then
you
would
assume
100
percent
capture.
To
determine
the
emissions
reduction
efficiency
of
the
control
device,
you
would
conduct
measurements
of
the
inlet
and
outlet
gas
streams.
The
test
would
consist
of
three
runs,
each
run
lasting
at
least
1
hour,
using
the
following
EPA
Methods
in
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A:
 
Method
1
or
1A
for
selection
of
the
sampling
sites;
 
Method
2,
2A,
2C,
2D,
2F,
or
2G
to
determine
the
gas
volumetric
flow
rate;
 
Method
3,
3A,
or
3B
for
gas
analysis
to
determine
dry
molecular
weight.
You
may
also
use
as
an
alternative
to
Method
3B,
the
manual
method
for
measuring
the
oxygen,
carbon
dioxide,
and
carbon
monoxide
content
of
exhaust
gas
in
ANSI/
ASME
PTC
19.10
 
1981;
 
Method
4
to
determine
stack
moisture;
and
 
Method
25
or
25A
to
determine
organic
volatile
matter
concentration.
Alternatively,
any
other
test
method
or
data
that
have
been
validated
according
to
the
applicable
procedures
in
Method
301
of
40
CFR
part
63,
appendix
A,
and
approved
by
the
Administrator,
could
be
used.
If
you
use
a
solvent
recovery
system,
you
could
determine
the
overall
control
efficiency
using
a
liquid­
liquid
material
balance
instead
of
conducting
an
initial
performance
test.
If
you
use
the
material
balance
alternative,
you
would
be
required
to
measure
the
amount
of
all
materials
used
in
the
affected
source
during
each
month
of
the
initial
compliance
period
and
determine
the
volatile
matter
contained
in
these
materials.
You
would
also
measure
the
amount
of
volatile
matter
recovered
by
the
solvent
recovery
system
each
month
of
the
initial
compliance
period.
Then
you
would
compare
the
amount
recovered
to
the
amount
used
to
determine
the
overall
control
efficiency
and
apply
this
efficiency
to
the
ratio
of
organic
HAP
to
coating
solids
for
the
materials
used.
You
would
record
the
calculations
and
results
and
include
them
in
your
Notification
of
Compliance
Status.
Operating
Limits.
As
mentioned
above,
you
would
establish
operating
limits
as
part
of
the
initial
performance
test
of
an
emission
capture
and
control
system.
The
operating
limits
are
the
values
of
certain
parameters
measured
for
capture
systems
and
control
devices
during
the
most
recent
performance
test
that
demonstrated
compliance
with
the
emission
limits.
The
proposed
rule
specifies
the
parameters
to
monitor
for
the
types
of
emission
control
systems
commonly
used
in
the
industry.
You
would
be
required
to
install,
calibrate,
maintain,
and
continuously
operate
all
monitoring
equipment
according
to
the
manufacturer's
specifications
and
ensure
that
the
continuous
parameter
monitoring
systems
(
CPMS)
meet
the
requirements
in
40
CFR
63.3568
of
the
proposed
rule.
If
you
use
control
devices
other
than
those
identified
in
the
proposed
rule,
you
would
submit
the
operating
parameters
to
be
monitored
to
the
Administrator
for
approval.
The
authority
to
approve
the
parameters
to
be
monitored
is
retained
by
EPA
and
is
not
delegated
to
States.
If
you
use
a
thermal
oxidizer,
you
would
continuously
monitor
the
appropriate
temperature
and
record
it
at
least
every
15
minutes.
The
temperature
monitor
is
placed
in
the
firebox
or
in
the
duct
immediately
downstream
of
the
firebox
before
any
substantial
heat
exchange
occurs.
The
operating
limit
would
be
the
average
temperature
measured
during
the
performance
test,
and
for
each
consecutive
3­
hour
period
the
average
temperature
would
have
to
be
at
or
above
that
limit.
If
you
use
a
catalytic
oxidizer
you
may
choose
from
two
methods
to
determine
operating
limits.
In
the
first
method,
you
would
continuously
monitor
the
temperature
immediately
before
and
after
the
catalyst
bed
and
record
it
at
least
every
15
minutes.
The
operating
limits
would
be
the
average
temperature
difference
across
the
catalyst
bed
during
the
performance
test,
and
for
each
3­
hour
period
the
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00008
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2117
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
average
temperature
and
the
average
temperature
difference
would
have
to
be
at
or
above
those
limits.
In
the
alternative
method,
you
would
continuously
monitor
the
temperature
immediately
before
the
catalyst
bed
and
record
it
at
least
every
15
minutes.
The
operating
limit
would
be
the
average
temperature
just
before
the
catalyst
bed
during
the
performance
test,
and
for
each
3­
hour
period
the
average
temperature
would
have
to
be
at
or
above
that
limit.
As
part
of
the
alternative
method,
you
must
also
develop
and
implement
an
inspection
and
maintenance
plan
for
your
catalytic
oxidizer.
If
you
use
a
carbon
adsorber
and
do
not
conduct
liquid­
liquid
material
balances
to
demonstrate
compliance,
you
would
monitor
the
carbon
bed
temperature
after
each
regeneration
and
the
total
amount
of
steam
or
nitrogen
used
to
desorb
the
bed
for
each
regeneration.
The
operating
limits
would
be
the
carbon
bed
temperature
(
not
to
be
exceeded)
and
the
amount
of
steam
or
nitrogen
used
for
desorption
(
to
be
met
as
a
minimum).
If
you
use
a
condenser,
you
would
monitor
the
outlet
gas
temperature
to
ensure
that
the
air
stream
is
being
cooled
to
a
low
enough
temperature.
The
operating
limit
would
be
the
average
condenser
outlet
gas
temperature
measured
during
the
performance
test,
and
for
each
consecutive
3­
hour
period
the
average
temperature
would
have
to
be
at
or
below
this
limit.
If
you
use
a
concentrator,
you
would
monitor
the
desorption
concentrate
stream
gas
temperature
and
the
pressure
drop
of
the
dilute
stream
across
the
concentrator.
The
operating
limits
would
be
the
desorption
concentrate
gas
stream
temperature
(
to
be
met
as
a
minimum)
and
the
dilute
stream
pressure
drop
(
not
to
be
exceeded).
For
each
capture
system
that
is
not
a
PTE,
you
would
establish
operating
limits
for
gas
volumetric
flow
rate
or
duct
static
pressure
for
each
enclosure
or
capture
device.
The
operating
limit
would
be
the
average
volumetric
flow
rate
or
duct
static
pressure
during
the
performance
test
to
be
met
as
a
minimum.
For
each
capture
system
that
is
a
PTE,
the
operating
limit
would
require
the
average
facial
velocity
of
air
through
all
natural
draft
openings
to
be
at
least
200
feet
per
minute
or
the
pressure
drop
across
the
enclosure
to
be
at
least
0.007
inch
water.
Work
Practice
Standards.
If
you
use
a
capture
system
and
control
device
for
compliance,
you
would
be
required
to
develop
and
implement
on
an
ongoing
basis
a
work
practice
plan
for
minimizing
organic
HAP
emissions
from
storage,
mixing,
material
handling,
and
waste
handling
operations.
That
plan
would
include
a
description
of
all
steps
taken
to
minimize
emissions
from
those
sources
(
e.
g.,
using
closed
storage
containers,
practices
to
minimize
emissions
during
filling
and
transfer
of
contents
from
containers,
using
spill
minimization
techniques,
etc.).
You
would
have
to
make
the
plan
available
for
inspection
if
the
Administrator
requests
to
see
it.
Operations
During
Startup,
Shutdown,
or
Malfunction.
If
you
use
a
capture
system
and
control
device
for
compliance,
you
would
be
required
to
develop
and
operate
according
to
a
SSMP
during
periods
of
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
of
the
capture
system
and
control
device.
Option
4:
Compliance
Based
on
the
Control
Efficiency/
Outlet
Concentration
Option.
If
you
use
a
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
other
than
a
solvent
recovery
system
for
which
you
conduct
a
liquid­
liquid
material
balance,
you
may
meet
either
of
the
applicable
alternative
limits
summarized
in
Table
4
of
this
preamble
instead
of
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
limits
summarized
in
Tables
2
and
3
of
this
preamble.
Prior
to
the
initial
performance
test,
you
would
be
required
to
install
control
device
parameter
monitoring
equipment
to
be
used
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
the
capture
and
control
efficiencies
(
or
the
capture
efficiency
of
the
capture
system
and
the
oxidizer
outlet
concentration)
and
to
establish
operating
limits
to
be
achieved
on
a
continuous
basis.
During
the
initial
compliance
test,
you
would
use
the
control
device
parameter
monitoring
equipment
to
establish
parameter
values
that
represent
your
operating
requirements
for
the
control
systems.
You
would
record
the
initial
performance
test
results
and
include
them
in
the
Notification
of
Compliance
Status.
If
you
use
a
capture
system
and
addon
control
device
other
than
a
solvent
recovery
system
for
which
you
conduct
liquid­
liquid
material
balances,
you
would
verify
the
efficiency
of
the
capture
system
is
100
percent
and
determine
the
emissions
reduction
efficiency
of
the
control
device.
To
verify
the
capture
efficiency,
you
would
either
verify
the
presence
of
a
PTE
using
EPA
Method
204
of
40
CFR
part
51,
appendix
M,
or
use
one
of
the
protocols
in
§
63.3565
to
measure
capture
efficiency.
If
you
have
a
PTE
and
all
the
materials
are
applied
and
dried
within
the
enclosure
and
you
route
all
exhaust
gases
from
the
enclosure
to
a
control
device,
then
you
would
assume
100
percent
capture.
To
determine
the
emissions
reduction
efficiency
of
the
control
device,
you
would
conduct
measurements
of
the
inlet
and
outlet
gas
streams.
The
test
would
consist
of
three
runs,
each
run
lasting
at
least
1
hour,
using
the
following
EPA
Methods
in
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A:
 
Method
1
or
1A
for
selection
of
the
sampling
sites;
 
Method
2,
2A,
2C,
2D,
2F,
or
2G
to
determine
the
gas
volumetric
flow
rate;
 
Method
3,
3A,
or
3B
for
gas
analysis
to
determine
dry
molecular
weight.
You
may
also
use
as
an
alternative
to
Method
3B,
the
manual
method
for
measuring
the
oxygen,
carbon
dioxide,
and
carbon
monoxide
content
of
exhaust
gas
in
ANSI/
ASME
PTC
19.10
 
1981;
 
Method
4
to
determine
stack
moisture;
and
 
Method
25
or
25A
to
determine
organic
volatile
matter
concentration.
Alternatively,
any
other
test
method
or
data
that
have
been
validated
according
to
the
applicable
procedures
in
Method
301
of
40
CFR
part
63,
appendix
A,
and
approved
by
the
Administrator,
could
be
used.
If
you
use
a
solvent
recovery
system,
you
could
determine
the
overall
control
efficiency
using
a
liquid­
liquid
material
balance
instead
of
conducting
an
initial
performance
test.
If
you
use
the
material
balance
alternative,
you
would
be
required
to
measure
the
amount
of
all
materials
used
in
the
affected
source
during
each
month
of
the
initial
compliance
period
and
determine
the
volatile
matter
contained
in
these
materials.
You
would
also
measure
the
amount
of
volatile
matter
recovered
by
the
solvent
recovery
system
each
month
of
the
initial
compliance
period.
Then
you
would
compare
the
amount
recovered
to
the
amount
used
to
determine
the
overall
control
efficiency,
and
apply
this
efficiency
to
the
ratio
of
organic
HAP
to
coating
solids
for
the
materials
used.
You
would
record
the
calculations
and
results
and
include
them
in
your
Notification
of
Compliance
Status.
Operating
Limits.
As
mentioned
above,
you
would
establish
operating
limits
as
part
of
the
initial
performance
test
of
an
emission
capture
and
control
system.
The
operating
limits
are
the
values
of
certain
parameters
measured
for
capture
systems
and
control
devices
during
the
most
recent
performance
test
that
demonstrated
compliance
with
the
emission
limits.
The
proposed
rule
specifies
the
parameters
to
monitor
for
the
types
of
emission
control
systems
commonly
used
in
the
industry.

VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00009
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2118
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
You
would
be
required
to
install,
calibrate,
maintain,
and
continuously
operate
all
monitoring
equipment
according
to
the
manufacturer's
specifications
and
ensure
that
the
CPMS
meet
the
requirements
in
40
CFR
63.3568
of
the
proposed
rule.
If
you
use
control
devices
other
than
those
identified
in
the
proposed
rule,
you
would
submit
the
operating
parameters
to
be
monitored
to
the
Administrator
for
approval.
The
authority
to
approve
the
parameters
to
be
monitored
is
retained
by
EPA
and
is
not
delegated
to
States.
If
you
use
a
thermal
oxidizer,
you
would
continuously
monitor
the
appropriate
temperature
and
record
it
at
least
every
15
minutes.
The
temperature
monitor
is
placed
in
the
firebox
or
in
the
duct
immediately
downstream
of
the
firebox
before
any
substantial
heat
exchange
occurs.
The
operating
limit
would
be
the
average
temperature
measured
during
the
performance
test,
and
for
each
consecutive
3­
hour
period
the
average
temperature
would
have
to
be
at
or
above
that
limit.
If
you
use
a
catalytic
oxidizer
you
may
choose
from
two
methods
to
determine
operating
limits.
In
the
first
method,
you
would
continuously
monitor
the
temperature
immediately
before
and
after
the
catalyst
bed
and
record
it
at
least
every
15
minutes.
The
operating
limits
would
be
the
average
temperature
difference
across
the
catalyst
bed
during
the
performance
test,
and
for
each
3­
hour
period
the
average
temperature
and
the
average
temperature
difference
would
have
to
be
at
or
above
these
limits.
In
the
alternative
method,
you
would
continuously
monitor
the
temperature
immediately
before
the
catalyst
bed
and
record
it
at
least
every
15
minutes.
The
operating
limit
would
be
the
average
temperature
just
before
the
catalyst
bed
during
the
performance
test,
and
for
each
3­
hour
period
the
average
temperature
would
have
to
be
at
or
above
this
limit.
As
part
of
the
alternative
method,
you
must
also
develop
and
implement
an
inspection
and
maintenance
plan
for
your
catalytic
oxidizer.
If
you
use
a
carbon
adsorber
and
do
not
conduct
liquid­
liquid
material
balances
to
demonstrate
compliance,
you
would
monitor
the
carbon
bed
temperature
after
each
regeneration
and
the
total
amount
of
steam
or
nitrogen
used
to
desorb
the
bed
for
each
regeneration.
The
operating
limits
would
be
the
carbon
bed
temperature
(
not
to
be
exceeded)
and
the
amount
of
steam
or
nitrogen
used
for
desorption
(
to
be
met
as
a
minimum).
If
you
use
a
condenser,
you
would
monitor
the
outlet
gas
temperature
to
ensure
that
the
air
stream
is
being
cooled
to
a
low
enough
temperature.
The
operating
limit
would
be
the
average
condenser
outlet
gas
temperature
measured
during
the
performance
test,
and
for
each
consecutive
3­
hour
period
the
average
temperature
would
have
to
be
at
or
below
that
limit.
If
you
use
a
concentrator,
you
would
monitor
the
desorption
concentrate
stream
gas
temperature
and
the
pressure
drop
of
the
dilute
stream
across
the
concentrator.
The
operating
limits
would
be
the
desorption
concentrate
gas
stream
temperature
(
to
be
met
as
a
minimum)
and
the
dilute
stream
pressure
drop
(
not
to
be
exceeded).
For
each
capture
system
that
is
not
a
PTE,
you
would
establish
operating
limits
for
gas
volumetric
flow
rate
or
duct
static
pressure
for
each
enclosure
or
capture
device.
The
operating
limit
would
be
the
average
volumetric
flow
rate
or
duct
static
pressure
during
the
performance
test,
to
be
met
as
a
minimum.
For
each
capture
system
that
is
a
PTE,
the
operating
limit
would
require
the
average
facial
velocity
of
air
through
all
natural
draft
openings
to
be
at
least
200
feet
per
minute
or
the
pressure
drop
across
the
enclosure
to
be
at
least
0.007
inches
water.
Work
Practice
Standards.
If
you
use
a
capture
system
and
control
device
for
compliance,
you
would
be
required
to
develop
and
implement
on
an
ongoing
basis
a
work
practice
plan
for
minimizing
organic
HAP
emissions
from
storage,
mixing,
material
handling,
and
waste
handling
operations.
That
plan
would
include
a
description
of
all
steps
taken
to
minimize
emissions
from
those
sources
(
e.
g.,
using
closed
storage
containers,
practices
to
minimize
emissions
during
filling
and
transfer
of
contents
from
containers,
using
spill
minimization
techniques,
etc.).
You
would
have
to
make
the
plan
available
for
inspection
if
the
Administrator
requests
to
see
it.
Operations
During
Startup,
Shutdown,
or
Malfunction.
You
would
be
required
to
develop
and
operate
your
capture
system
and
control
device
according
to
a
SSMP
during
periods
of
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
of
the
capture
system
and
control
device.

H.
What
Are
the
Continuous
Compliance
Requirements?
Option
1:
Compliance
Based
on
the
Compliant
Material
Option.
If
you
demonstrate
compliance
with
the
proposed
emission
limits
based
on
the
compliant
material
option,
you
would
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
if,
for
each
12­
month
compliance
period,
the
organic
HAP
content
of
each
coating
used
does
not
exceed
the
applicable
emission
limit
and
you
use
no
thinner
that
contains
organic
HAP.
Option
2:
Compliance
Based
on
the
Emission
Rate
Without
Add­
On
Controls
Option.
If
you
demonstrate
compliance
with
the
proposed
emission
limits
based
on
the
emission
rate
without
add­
on
controls
option,
you
would
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
if,
for
each
rolling
12­
month
compliance
period,
the
ratio
of
organic
HAP
in
all
coatings
and
thinners
in
each
coating
type
segment
to
coating
solids
in
that
coating
type
segment
is
less
than
or
equal
to
the
applicable
emission
limit.
You
would
follow
the
same
procedures
for
calculating
the
organic
HAP
to
coating
solids
ratio
that
you
used
for
the
initial
compliance
period.
If
you
use
an
alternative
calculated
overall
HAP
emission
limit
for
all
coating
type
segments
within
a
subcategory,
you
would
use
the
same
procedures
that
you
used
for
the
initial
compliance
period.
Whichever
approach
you
use
must
be
used
consistently
throughout
each
12­
month
compliance
period.
Option
3:
Compliance
Based
on
the
Emission
Rate
With
Add­
On
Controls
Option.
For
each
coating
operation
on
which
you
use
a
capture
system
and
control
device,
other
than
a
solvent
recovery
system
for
which
you
conduct
a
liquid­
liquid
material
balance,
you
would
use
the
continuous
parameter
monitoring
results
for
the
month
in
determining
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions.
If
the
monitoring
results
indicate
no
deviations
from
the
operating
limits
and
there
were
no
bypasses
of
the
control
device,
you
would
assume
the
capture
system
and
control
device
are
achieving
the
same
percent
emissions
reduction
efficiency
as
they
did
during
the
most
recent
performance
test
in
which
compliance
was
demonstrated.
You
would
then
apply
that
percent
reduction
to
the
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
materials
used
in
controlled
coating
operations
to
determine
the
monthly
emission
rate
from
those
operations.
If
there
were
any
deviations
from
the
operating
limits
during
the
month
or
any
bypasses
of
the
control
device,
you
would
account
for
them
in
the
calculation
of
the
monthly
emission
rate
by
assuming
the
capture
system
and
control
device
were
achieving
zero
emissions
reduction
during
the
periods
of
deviation.
Then,
you
would
determine
the
annual
average
emission
rate
by
calculating
the
ratio
for
the
most
recent
12­
month
period.
For
each
coating
operation
on
which
you
use
a
solvent
recovery
system
and
conduct
a
liquid­
liquid
material
balance
each
month,
you
would
use
the
liquid­

VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00010
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2119
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
liquid
material
balance
to
determine
control
efficiency.
To
determine
the
overall
control
efficiency,
you
must
measure
the
amount
of
all
materials
used
during
each
month
and
determine
the
volatile
matter
content
of
these
materials.
You
must
also
measure
the
amount
of
volatile
matter
recovered
by
the
solvent
recovery
system
during
the
month,
calculate
the
overall
control
efficiency,
and
apply
it
to
the
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
the
materials
used
to
determine
total
organic
HAP
emissions.
Then,
you
would
determine
the
annual
average
emission
rate
by
taking
the
average
of
the
monthly
ratios
for
the
most
recent
12­
month
period.
Operating
Limits.
If
you
use
a
capture
system
and
control
device,
the
proposed
rule
would
require
you
to
achieve
on
a
continuous
basis
the
operating
limits
you
establish
during
the
performance
test.
If
the
continuous
monitoring
shows
that
the
capture
system
and
control
device
is
operating
outside
the
range
of
values
established
during
the
performance
test,
you
have
deviated
from
the
established
operating
limits.
If
you
operate
a
capture
system
and
control
device
that
allow
emissions
to
bypass
the
control
device,
you
would
have
to
demonstrate
that
organic
HAP
emissions
from
each
emission
point
within
the
affected
source
are
being
routed
to
the
control
device
by
monitoring
for
potential
bypass
of
the
control
device.
You
may
choose
from
the
following
four
monitoring
procedures:
 
Flow
control
position
indicator
to
provide
a
record
of
whether
the
exhaust
stream
is
directed
to
the
control
device;
 
Car­
seal
or
lock­
and­
key
valve
closures
to
secure
the
bypass
line
valve
in
the
closed
position
when
the
control
device
is
operating;
 
Valve
closure
continuous
monitoring
to
ensure
any
bypass
line
valve
or
damper
is
closed
when
the
control
device
is
operating;
or
 
Automatic
shutdown
system
to
stop
the
coating
operation
when
flow
is
diverted
from
the
control
device.
If
the
bypass
monitoring
procedures
indicate
that
emissions
are
not
routed
to
the
control
device,
you
have
deviated
from
the
emission
limits.
Work
Practice
Standards.
If
you
use
an
emission
capture
system
and
control
device
for
compliance,
you
would
be
required
to
implement
on
an
ongoing
basis
the
work
practice
plan
you
developed
during
the
initial
compliance
period.
If
you
did
not
develop
a
plan
for
reducing
organic
HAP
emissions
or
you
do
not
implement
the
plan,
that
would
be
a
deviation
from
the
work
practice
standards.
Operations
During
Startup,
Shutdown,
or
Malfunction.
If
you
use
a
capture
system
and
control
device
for
compliance,
you
would
be
required
to
develop
and
operate
according
to
an
SSMP
during
periods
of
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
of
the
capture
system
and
control
device.
Option
4:
Compliance
Based
on
the
Control
Efficiency/
Outlet
Concentration
Option.
If
you
use
a
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
other
than
a
solvent
recovery
system
for
which
you
conduct
a
liquid­
liquid
material
balance,
your
testing
and
continuous
compliance
requirements
are
the
same
as
those
in
Option
3.
For
add­
on
control
systems,
you
would
be
required
to
install
control
device
parameter
monitoring
equipment
to
be
used
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
the
operating
requirements
for
add­
on
control
systems
in
today's
proposed
rule.
If
you
operate
a
CPMS,
it
would
have
to
collect
data
at
least
every
15
minutes
and
you
would
need
to
have
at
least
three
data
points
per
hour
to
have
a
valid
hour
of
data.
You
would
have
to
operate
the
CPMS
at
all
times
the
surface
coating
operation
and
control
systems
are
operating.
You
would
also
have
to
conduct
proper
maintenance
of
the
CPMS
and
maintain
an
inventory
of
necessary
parts
for
routine
repairs
of
the
CPMS.
Using
the
data
collected
with
the
CPMS,
you
would
calculate
and
record
the
average
values
of
each
operating
parameter
according
to
the
specified
averaging
times.

I.
What
Are
the
Notification,
Recordkeeping,
and
Reporting
Requirements?
You
are
required
to
comply
with
the
applicable
requirements
in
the
NESHAP
General
Provisions,
subpart
A
of
40
CFR
part
63,
as
described
in
the
proposed
rule.
The
General
Provisions
notification
requirements
include:
Initial
notifications,
notification
of
performance
test
if
you
are
complying
using
a
capture
system
and
control
device,
notification
of
compliance
status,
and
additional
notifications
required
for
affected
sources
with
continuous
monitoring
systems.
The
General
Provisions
also
require
certain
records
and
periodic
reports.
Initial
Notification.
If
the
proposed
standards
apply
to
you
as
a
new
or
reconstructed
affected
source,
you
must
send
a
notification
to
the
EPA
Regional
Office
in
the
region
where
your
facility
is
located
and
to
your
State
agency
within
120
days
after
the
date
of
initial
startup
or
120
days
after
publication
of
the
final
rule,
whichever
is
later.
Existing
affected
sources
must
send
the
initial
notification
within
1
year
after
publication
of
the
final
rule.
The
report
notifies
us
and
your
State
agency
that
you
have
constructed
a
new
facility,
reconstructed
an
existing
facility,
or
you
have
an
existing
facility
that
is
subject
to
the
proposed
rule.
Thus,
it
allows
you
and
the
permitting
authority
to
plan
for
compliance
activities.
You
would
also
need
to
send
a
notification
of
planned
construction
or
reconstruction
of
a
source
that
would
be
subject
to
the
proposed
rule
and
apply
for
approval
to
construct
or
reconstruct.
Notification
of
Performance
Test.
If
you
demonstrate
compliance
by
using
a
capture
system
and
control
device
for
which
you
do
not
conduct
a
liquidliquid
material
balance,
you
would
conduct
a
performance
test.
For
a
new
or
reconstructed
affected
source,
the
performance
test
would
be
required
no
later
than
180
days
after
initial
startup
or
180
days
after
publication
of
the
final
rule,
whichever
is
later.
For
an
existing
source,
the
performance
test
would
be
required
no
later
than
the
compliance
date.
You
must
notify
us
(
or
the
delegated
State
or
local
agency)
at
least
60
calendar
days
before
the
performance
test
is
scheduled
to
begin,
as
indicated
in
the
General
Provisions
for
the
NESHAP.
Notification
of
Compliance
Status.
Your
compliance
procedures
would
depend
on
which
compliance
option
you
choose.
For
each
compliance
option,
you
would
send
us
a
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
within
30
days
after
the
end
of
the
initial
compliance
period.
In
the
notification,
you
would
certify
whether
the
affected
source
has
complied
with
the
proposed
standards,
identify
the
option(
s)
you
used
to
demonstrate
initial
compliance,
summarize
the
data
and
calculations
supporting
the
compliance
demonstration,
and
describe
how
you
will
determine
continuous
compliance.
If
you
elect
to
comply
by
using
a
capture
system
and
control
device
for
which
you
conduct
performance
tests,
you
must
provide
the
results
of
the
tests.
Your
notification
would
also
include
the
measured
range
of
each
monitored
parameter
and
the
operating
limits
established
during
the
performance
test,
and
information
showing
whether
the
affected
source
has
complied
with
its
operating
limits
during
the
initial
compliance
period.
Recordkeeping
Requirements.
You
would
be
required
to
keep
records
of
reported
information
and
all
other
information
necessary
to
document
compliance
with
the
proposed
rule
for
5
years.
As
required
under
the
General
Provisions,
records
for
the
2
most
recent
years
must
be
kept
on­
site;
the
other
3
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00011
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2120
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
years'
records
may
be
kept
off­
site.
Records
pertaining
to
the
design
and
operation
of
control
and
monitoring
equipment
must
be
kept
for
the
life
of
the
equipment.
Depending
on
the
compliance
option
that
you
choose,
you
may
need
to
keep
records
of
the
following:
 
Organic
HAP
content,
volatile
matter
content,
coating
solids
content,
and
quantity
of
the
coatings
and
other
materials
applied;
and
 
All
documentation
supporting
initial
notifications
and
notifications
of
compliance
status.
If
you
demonstrate
compliance
by
using
a
capture
system
and
control
device,
you
would
also
need
to
keep
records
of
the
following:
 
The
occurrence
and
duration
of
each
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
of
the
emission
capture
system
and
control
device;
 
All
maintenance
performed
on
the
capture
system
and
control
device;
 
Actions
taken
during
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
that
are
different
from
the
procedures
specified
in
the
affected
source's
SSMP;
 
All
information
necessary
to
demonstrate
conformance
with
the
affected
source's
SSMP
when
the
plan
procedures
are
followed;
 
All
information
necessary
to
demonstrate
conformance
with
the
affected
source's
plan
for
minimizing
emissions
from
mixing,
storage,
and
waste
handling
operations;
 
Each
period
during
which
a
CPMS
is
malfunctioning
or
inoperative
(
including
out
of
control
periods);
 
All
required
measurements
needed
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
the
standards;
and
 
All
results
of
performance
tests.
The
proposed
rule
would
require
you
to
collect
and
keep
records
according
to
your
monitoring
plan.
Failure
to
collect
and
keep
the
specified
minimum
data
would
be
a
deviation
that
is
separate
from
any
emission
limits,
operating
limits,
or
work
practice
standards.
Deviations,
as
determined
from
those
records,
would
need
to
be
recorded
and
also
reported.
A
deviation
is
any
instance
when
any
requirement
or
obligation
established
by
the
proposed
rule
including,
but
not
limited
to,
the
emission
limits,
operating
limits,
and
work
practice
standards,
are
not
met.
If
you
use
a
capture
system
and
control
device
to
reduce
organic
HAP
emissions,
you
would
have
to
make
your
SSMP
available
for
inspection
if
the
Administrator
requests
to
see
it.
The
plan
would
stay
in
your
records
for
the
life
of
the
affected
source
or
until
the
affected
source
is
no
longer
subject
to
the
proposed
standards.
If
you
revise
the
plan,
you
would
need
to
keep
the
previous
superceded
versions
on
record
for
5
years
following
the
revision.
Periodic
Reports.
Each
year
is
divided
into
two
semiannual
reporting
periods.
If
no
deviations
occur
during
a
semiannual
reporting
period,
you
would
submit
a
semiannual
report
stating
that
the
affected
source
has
been
in
continuous
compliance.
If
deviations
occur,
you
would
need
to
include
them
in
the
report
as
follows:
 
Report
each
deviation
from
the
emission
limit.
 
Report
each
deviation
from
the
work
practice
standards
if
you
use
an
emission
capture
system
and
control
device.
 
If
you
use
an
emission
capture
system
and
control
device,
report
each
deviation
from
an
operating
limit
and
each
time
a
bypass
line
diverts
emissions
from
the
control
device
to
the
atmosphere.
 
Report
other
specific
information
on
the
periods
of
time
and
details
of
deviations
that
occurred.
You
would
also
have
to
include
an
explanation
in
each
semiannual
report
if
a
change
occurs
that
might
affect
the
compliance
status
of
the
affected
source
or
you
change
to
another
option
for
meeting
the
applicable
emission
limit.
Other
Reports.
You
would
be
required
to
submit
reports
for
periods
of
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
of
the
capture
system
and
control
device.
If
the
procedures
you
follow
during
any
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
are
inconsistent
with
your
plan,
you
would
report
those
procedures
with
your
semiannual
reports
in
addition
to
immediate
reports
required
by
the
General
Provisions
in
section
63.10(
d)(
5)(
ii).

III.
Rationale
for
Selecting
the
Proposed
Standards
A.
How
Did
We
Select
the
Source
Category
and
Subcategories?

Metal
can
surface
coating
operations
is
on
the
CAA
list
of
source
categories
to
be
regulated
because
it
contains
major
sources
that
emit
or
have
the
potential
to
emit
at
least
9.07
Mg
(
10
tons)
of
any
one
HAP
or
at
least
22.7
Mg
(
25
tons)
of
any
combination
of
HAP
annually.
The
proposed
rule
would
control
HAP
emissions
from
both
new
or
reconstructed
and
existing
major
sources.
Area
sources
are
not
being
regulated
under
the
proposed
rule.
We
intend
the
source
category
to
include
facilities
for
which
the
surface
coating
of
metal
cans
is
either
their
principal
activity
or
is
an
integral
part
of
a
production
process
which
is
the
principal
activity.
While
some
facilities
are
entirely
dedicated
to
surface
coating,
most
metal
can
surface
coating
operations
are
located
at
plant
sites
for
which
can
manufacturing
is
the
principal
activity.
Both
stand­
alone
and
co­
located
surface
coating
operations
are
included
in
the
source
category,
and
the
definition
of
the
source
category
is
intended
to
reflect
that
inclusion.
The
project
database
was
used
to
identify
those
``
major
source''
or
``
synthetic
minor
source''
facilities
that
reported
using
at
least
5,700
liter/
yr
(
1,500
gal/
yr)
of
coatings
in
metal
can
surface
coating
operations.
The
source
category
does
not
include
research
or
laboratory
facilities
or
janitorial,
building,
and
facility
maintenance
operations.
Subcategory
Selection.
The
statute
gives
us
discretion
to
determine
if
and
how
to
subcategorize.
A
subcategory
is
a
group
of
similar
sources
within
a
given
source
category.
As
part
of
the
regulatory
development
process,
we
evaluate
the
similarities
and
differences
among
industry
segments
or
groups
of
facilities
comprising
a
source
category.
In
establishing
subcategories,
we
consider
factors
such
as
process
operations
(
type
of
process,
raw
materials,
chemistry/
formulation
data,
associated
equipment,
and
final
products),
emission
characteristics
(
amount
and
type
of
HAP),
control
device
applicability,
and
opportunities
for
pollution
prevention.
We
may
also
consider
existing
regulations
or
guidance
from
States
and
other
regulatory
agencies
in
determining
subcategories.
After
reviewing
survey
responses
from
the
industry,
facility
site
visit
reports,
and
information
received
from
stakeholder
meetings
we
found
that
the
metal
can
surface
coating
industry
may
be
grouped
into
four
product
groups
or
subcategories
with
different
coating
processes
and
performance
requirements.
The
four
subcategories
are
(
1)
One­
and
two­
piece
D&
I
can
body
coating,
(
2)
sheetcoating,
(
3)
three­
piece
can
body
assembly
coating,
and
(
4)
end
lining.
We
also
found
significant
differences
in
coating
requirements
for
cans
manufactured
for
different
end
uses
within
several
of
these
subcategories
that
warranted
further
segmentation
into
coating
types
within
the
subcategories.
Descriptions
of
each
subcategory
and
coating
type
segment
are
given
in
the
following
paragraphs.
One­
and
Two­
Piece
Draw
and
Iron
Can
Body
Coating.
Aluminum
or
steel
D&
I
cans
are
made
from
metal
coil
by
stamping
out
shallow
metal
cups
which
are
then
placed
on
a
cylinder
and
forced
through
a
series
of
rings
of
decreasing
annular
space
to
further
draw
out
the
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00012
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2121
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
wall
of
the
can
and
iron
out
folds
in
the
metal.
Surface
coatings,
both
interior
and
exterior,
are
then
applied
to
the
formed
can.
There
are
several
reasons
why
D&
I
can
body
coating
is
a
separate
subcategory.
In
both
annual
production
and
overall
HAP
emissions,
cans
made
by
the
D&
I
process
make
up
the
largest
component
of
the
metal
can
manufacturing
industry.
The
processes
by
which
they
are
produced
and
surface­
coated,
and,
to
some
extent,
the
coatings
used,
differ
significantly
from
those
used
for
other
types
of
cans,
and
because
of
existing
VOC
rules
and
the
coating
processes
and
configuration
of
D&
I
facilities,
emission
control
devices
are
commonly
used.
While
the
general
production
and
coating
application
processes
are
similar
for
all
D&
I
cans,
differences
in
coating
types
and
relative
amount
of
coating
used
for
cans
with
different
end
uses
warrant
a
further
subdivision
of
that
subcategory
into
three
coating
type
segments:
(
1)
Two­
piece
beverage
can
coatings,
(
2)
two­
piece
food
can
coatings,
and
(
3)
one­
piece
aerosol
can
coatings.
A
different
MACT
standard
is
proposed
for
each
of
those
segments.
Sheetcoating.
The
subcategory
includes
all
of
the
flat
metal
sheet
coating
operations
associated
with
the
manufacture
of
three­
piece
cans,
decorative
tins,
crowns
and
closures,
and
two­
piece
draw­
redraw
cans.
The
methods
of
coating
application
and
the
types
of
coatings
used
on
flat
sheets
differ
significantly
from
those
used
in
the
other
subcategories.
The
coatings
(
interior
and
exterior
base
coatings,
decorative
inks,
and
overvarnishes)
are
most
commonly
applied
by
roller
to
the
flat
metal
sheets,
which
then
pass
through
a
curing
oven.
While
those
emission
points
are
sometimes
uncontrolled,
the
best­
performing
sources
typically
control
emissions
through
the
use
of
ultraviolet
cured
coatings
or
partial
or
total
enclosures
routed
to
thermal
or
catalytic
oxidizers
that
achieve
destruction
efficiencies
of
95
percent
or
higher.
Decorative
inks,
which
make
up
a
significant
proportion
of
the
coatings
used
in
sheetcoating,
have
very
low
concentrations
of
HAP
and
are
inherently
low­
emitting.
Three­
Piece
Can
Body
Assembly
Coatings.
Three­
piece
cans
consist
of
an
open­
ended
can
body
and
two
separate
ends.
Can
body
assembly
is
the
step
in
the
three­
piece
can
manufacturing
process
in
which
flat
body
blanks
are
formed
into
a
cylinder
and
the
side
seams
are
joined
together.
Coating
operations
associated
with
can
body
assembly
are
interior
and
exterior
side
seam
stripe
and
inside
spray
applications.
Several
characteristics
of
three­
piece
can
body
assembly
coating
place
it
in
a
separate
subcategory.
Can
assembly
facilities
use
only
a
limited
number
of
coatings
in
relatively
small
total
volumes.
Side
seam
striping
is
unique
in
that
the
application
process
and
coating
formulations
have
higher
solvency
requirements
than
other
can
body
and
end
coatings
and
end
seal
compounds.
Side
seam
stripe
emissions
are
typically
uncontrolled
because
emission
rates
are
low
and
capturing
emissions
is
not
economical
due
to
high
air
flow
rates
and
low
solvent
loading.
Three­
piece
cans
made
for
different
end
uses
and
contents
require
coatings,
particularly
side
seam
stripes,
with
widely
differing
chemical
characteristics
and
shelf
life
requirements.
Some
food
cans
must
be
sterilized
before
filling
by
subjecting
them
to
high
temperature
steam,
chemicals,
or
a
combination
of
both,
while
other
food
cans
do
not
require
this
kind
of
aseptic
processing.
Different
kinds
of
foods
vary
in
their
acid
contents.
Coatings
required
on
cans
for
these
different
end
uses
often
have
significantly
different
HAP
contents.
Inside
spray
coatings
also
differ
from
side
seam
stripes
in
quantity
used
and
chemical
composition.
For
those
reasons,
the
three­
piece
can
body
assembly
coating
subcategory
is
divided
into
five
distinct
coating
type
segments
with
different
emission
limits
for
each.
Those
segments
include:
(
1)
Inside
spray
coatings,
(
2)
aseptic
side
seam
stripe
coatings
for
food
cans,
(
3)
nonaseptic
side
seam
stripe
coatings
for
food
cans,
(
4)
side
seam
stripe
coatings
for
non­
food
general
line
cans,
and
(
5)
side
seam
stripe
coatings
for
non­
food
aerosol
cans.
End
Lining
Coatings.
End
lining
coating
operations
consisting
of
the
application
of
end
seal
compounds
to
can
ends
are
in
a
separate
subcategory
for
several
reasons.
Unlike
other
coatings,
end
seal
compounds
are
applied
in
a
bead
around
the
edges
of
can
ends.
Curing
takes
place
under
ambient
conditions
(
not
in
a
curing
oven)
over
a
longer
period
of
time
than
other
coatings.
And
the
coating
formulation
(
solids
content,
types
of
solvents
used)
of
end
seal
compounds
differs
significantly
from
other
coatings.
Emissions
from
end
lining
operations
are
not
controlled
because
the
curing
rate
of
end
seal
compounds
is
slow.
Controlling
such
volatile
HAP
emissions
is
not
cost
effective,
since
it
would
result
in
a
high
volume,
low
concentration
emission
stream
requiring
significant
auxiliary
fuel
usage
to
achieve
a
high
destruction
efficiency.
As
with
side
seam
stripes,
some
end
seal
compounds
must
withstand
aseptic
processing
while
others
do
not
have
to
meet
that
requirement.
There
are
significant
differences
in
formulation
and
HAP
content
(
and
emissions)
for
end
seal
compounds
for
aseptic
and
non­
aseptic
applications.
For
that
reason
the
end
lining
subcategory
is
divided
into
two
coating
type
segments:
aseptic
and
non­
aseptic.

B.
How
Did
We
Select
the
Regulated
Pollutants?
Organic
HAP.
Available
emission
data
collected
during
the
development
of
the
proposed
rule
show
that
the
primary
organic
HAP
emitted
from
metal
can
surface
coating
operations
include
EGBE
and
other
glycol
ethers,
xylenes,
hexane,
MEK,
and
MIBK.
Those
compounds
account
for
95
percent
of
that
source
category's
nationwide
organic
HAP
emissions.
Other
significant
organic
HAP
emissions
include
isophorone,
ethyl
benzene,
toluene,
trichloroethylene,
formaldehyde,
and
naphthalene.
Because
coatings
used
by
metal
can
surface
coating
operations
contain
many
combinations
of
those
and
other
organic
HAP,
it
is
not
practical
to
regulate
them
individually.
Therefore,
the
proposed
rule
would
regulate
emissions
of
all
organic
HAP.
Inorganic
HAP.
Based
on
information
reported
during
the
development
of
the
proposed
rule,
inorganic
HAP
contained
in
the
coatings
used
by
that
source
category
include
chromium,
manganese,
and
antimony
compounds.
Because
these
inorganic
compounds
are
in
the
coating
solids,
they
are
retained
in
the
dry
(
film)
coating
on
the
substrate
to
which
the
coating
is
applied.
The
only
opportunity
for
any
quantifiable
solids
material
to
enter
the
ambient
air
is
if
they
are
spray­
applied
and
emitted
as
overspray.
Because
of
the
atomization
of
the
coating
during
spray
application,
inorganic
compounds
become
airborne
and
are
either
deposited
on
the
substrate,
fall
to
the
floor
in
the
spray
application
area,
or
enter
the
air
and
become
susceptible
to
transport
to
other
areas
in
the
building
or
outside
into
the
ambient
air.
The
data
available
to
EPA
indicate
that
the
facilities
in
that
source
category
that
use
spray
application
techniques
in
rare
instances
apply
coatings
that
contain
inorganic
HAP
compounds.
However,
because
they
do
not
have
emission
control
systems
for
inorganic
compounds,
there
is
no
demonstrated
control
technology
on
which
to
base
a
standard.
Therefore,
the
proposed
rule
would
not
regulate
emissions
of
inorganic
HAP.

VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00013
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2122
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
C.
How
Did
We
Select
the
Affected
Source?

In
selecting
the
affected
source(
s)
for
emission
standards,
our
primary
goal
is
to
ensure
that
MACT
is
applied
to
HAPemitting
operations
or
activities
within
the
source
category
or
subcategory
being
regulated.
The
affected
source
also
serves
to
determine
where
new
source
MACT
applies
under
a
particular
standard.
Specifically,
the
General
Provisions
in
subpart
A
of
40
CFR
part
63
define
the
terms
``
construction''
and
``
reconstruction''
with
reference
to
the
term
``
affected
source''
and
provide
that
new
source
MACT
applies
when
construction
or
reconstruction
of
an
affected
source
occurs.
The
collection
of
equipment
and
activities
evaluated
in
determining
MACT
(
including
the
MACT
floor)
is
used
in
defining
the
affected
source.
When
an
emission
standard
is
based
on
a
collection
of
emission
sources
or
total
facility
emissions,
we
select
an
affected
source
based
on
that
same
collection
of
emission
sources,
or
the
total
facility,
as
well.
That
approach
for
defining
the
affected
source
broadly
is
particularly
appropriate
for
industries
where
a
plantwide
emission
standard
provides
the
opportunity
and
incentive
for
owners
and
operators
to
utilize
control
strategies
that
are
more
costeffective
than
if
separate
standards
were
established
for
each
emission
point
within
an
affected
source.
Selection
of
Affected
Source.
The
affected
source
for
the
proposed
standards
is
broadly
defined
for
each
subcategory.
It
includes
all
metal
can
surface
coating
operations
and
associated
ancillary
equipment
within
each
of
the
four
subcategories.
Those
operations
include
all
coating
application
equipment,
all
coating
and
thinner
storage
containers
and
mixing
vessels,
all
equipment
and
containers
used
for
conveying
coatings
and
thinners,
and
all
storage
containers
and
conveyance
equipment
for
waste
materials
generated
by
a
metal
can
surface
coating
operation.
Since
a
facility
may
have
coating
operations
in
more
than
one
subcategory
and,
thus,
be
subject
to
separate
emission
limits
for
each
subcategory,
we
have
defined
all
the
coating­
related
equipment
in
each
subcategory
as
the
affected
source.
In
selecting
the
affected
source,
we
considered,
for
each
operation,
the
extent
to
which
HAPcontaining
materials
are
used
and
the
amount
of
HAP
that
are
emitted.
Coating
application,
flash­
off,
and
curing/
drying
operations
account
for
the
majority
of
HAP
emission
and
are
included
in
the
affected
source.
We
were
not
able
to
obtain
data
to
adequately
quantify
HAP
emissions
from
storage,
mixing,
cleaning,
waste
handling
and
wastewater
treatment.
However,
solvents
that
are
added
to
coatings
as
thinners,
for
example,
may
be
emitted
during
mixing
and
storage.
The
level
of
emissions
depends
on
the
type
of
mixing
and
the
type
of
storage
container
and
the
work
practices
used
at
the
affected
source.
The
magnitude
of
emissions
from
cleaning
depends
primarily
on
the
type,
amount,
and
HAP
content
of
cleaning
materials
used.
Emissions
from
waste
handling
operations
depend
on
the
type
of
system
used
to
collect
and
transport
organic­
HAP­
containing
waste
materials
in
the
affected
source.
The
HAP
emissions
from
wastewater
treatment
depend
on
the
quantity
and
types
of
HAP
discharged
to
the
wastewater
treatment
operation
and
the
subsequent
wastewater
treatment
processes,
e.
g.,
treatment
by
aeration
or
by
biodegradation.
Mixing,
storage,
cleaning,
waste
handling,
and
wastewater
treatment
operations
are
included
in
the
affected
source.
A
broad
definition
of
the
affected
source
was
selected
to
provide
maximum
flexibility
in
complying
with
the
proposed
emission
limits
for
organic
HAP.
In
planning
its
total
usage
of
HAPcontaining
materials,
each
affected
source
can
select
among
available
coating,
printing,
thinning,
and
cleaning
materials,
as
well
as
use
of
emission
capture
systems
and
add­
on
controls
for
coating
operations,
to
maximize
emissions
reductions
in
the
most
costeffective
manner.
Additional
information
on
the
metal
can
surface
coating
operations
selected
for
regulation
and
other
operations
are
included
in
the
docket
for
the
proposed
standards.

D.
How
Did
We
Determine
the
Basis
and
Level
of
the
Proposed
Standards
for
New
or
Reconstructed
Affected
Sources
and
Existing
Affected
Sources?
The
sections
below
present
the
rationale
for
determining
the
MACT
floor,
regulatory
alternatives
beyond
the
floor,
and
selection
of
the
proposed
standards
for
new
or
reconstructed
and
existing
affected
sources.
How
did
we
determine
the
MACT
floor?
After
we
identify
the
specific
source
categories
or
subcategories
of
sources
to
regulate
under
section
112
of
the
CAA,
we
must
develop
emission
standards
for
each
category
and
subcategory.
Section
112(
d)(
3)
establishes
a
minimum
baseline
or
floor
for
standards.
For
new
or
reconstructed
affected
sources
in
a
category
or
subcategory,
the
standards
cannot
be
less
stringent
than
the
emission
control
achieved
in
practice
by
the
bestcontrolled
similar
source
for
which
we
have
emission
information.
The
standards
for
existing
affected
sources
can
be
less
stringent
than
standards
for
new
or
reconstructed
sources,
but
they
cannot
be
less
stringent
than
the
average
emission
control
achieved
by
the
bestperforming
12
percent
of
existing
sources
(
or
the
best­
performing
five
existing
sources
for
categories
or
subcategories
with
fewer
than
30
sources)
for
which
we
have
emission
information.
In
the
metal
can
surface
coating
industry,
organic
HAP
emission
control
for
surface
coating
operations
is
accomplished
through
the
use
of
low­
or
no­
HAP
coatings
and
thinners
and
addon
capture
and
control
systems.
While
various
emission
control
techniques
have
achieved
broad
use
in
the
industry,
different
facilities
use
various
combinations
of
low­
or
no­
HAP
materials
and
add­
on
control
equipment
for
different
types
of
surface
coating
operations.
For
example,
the
continuous
linear
configuration
of
sheetcoating
operations
make
them
more
amenable
to
emissions
reduction
with
add­
on
control
equipment,
while
the
nature
of
side
seam
stripe
coating
applications
make
add­
on
emission
control
impractical.
Thus,
the
most
reasonable
approach
to
establishing
a
MACT
floor
is
the
evaluation
of
a
source's
organic
HAP
emissions
for
each
type
of
coating
operation
and
each
coating
type
segment
it
includes.
To
account
for
differences
in
coating
volumes
used
in
different
types
of
operations
and
differences
in
production
levels
from
one
source
to
another,
we
normalized
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
by
the
volume
of
coating
solids
used.
We
used
information
obtained
from
industry
survey
responses
to
estimate
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
for
each
subcategory
and
coating
type
segment
included
in
each
facility.
We
calculated
total
organic
HAP
emissions
by
assuming
that
100
percent
of
the
volatile
components
in
all
coatings
and
thinners
are
emitted.
Sources
used
for
determining
the
MACT
floor
emission
limits
included
those
facilities
that
listed
major
source
or
synthetic
minor
source
as
their
title
V
status
on
their
responses
to
questionnaires
we
sent
to
them
and
that
used
at
least
5,700
liters/
yr
(
1,500
gal/
yr)
of
coatings
in
metal
can
surface
coating
operations.
Other
sources
were
included
if
their
data
indicated
that
they
have
the
capacity
to
increase
their
organic
HAP
emissions
to
at
least
9.1
Mg/
yr
(
10
tpy),
even
though
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00014
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2123
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
they
did
not
identify
themselves
as
major
or
synthetic
minor
sources.
Using
the
organic
HAP
emissions
and
the
total
volume
of
coating
solids
used
in
each
subcategory
and
coating
type
segment
for
each
survey
respondent,
we
calculated
the
normalized
organic
HAP
emissions
(
emission
rate)
in
units
of
kilograms
(
kg)
organic
HAP
per
liter
of
coating
solids
(
pounds
(
lb)
organic
HAP
per
gal
of
coating
solids)
used.
The
sources
were
then
ranked
from
the
lowest
to
the
highest
emission
rate
in
each
of
the
four
subcategories
and
coating
type
segments.
For
subcategories
and
coating
segments
in
which
there
were
more
than
30
sources,
the
existing
source
MACT
floor
was
based
on
the
top
12
percent
of
the
sources.
For
subcategories
and
coating
segments
with
fewer
than
30
sources,
the
existing
source
MACT
floor
was
based
on
the
top
five
sources.
The
average
emission
rate
for
each
subcategory
was
interpreted
as
the
median
value
of
the
included
sources.
The
median
emission
rate
was
selected
rather
than
the
mean
or
mode
because
it
is
associated
with
an
actual
emission
rate
being
achieved
by
a
real
facility.
The
best
performing
source
in
each
subcategory
or
coating
segment
in
the
database
determined
the
MACT
floor
for
new
or
reconstructed
affected
sources.
The
MACT
floor
analysis
for
new
affected
sources
resulted
in
the
emission
limits
for
each
subcategory
and
coating
segment
given
in
Table
2
of
this
preamble.
The
analysis
for
existing
affected
sources
resulted
in
emission
limits
given
in
Table
3
of
this
preamble.
The
alternative
control
efficiency
and
outlet
concentration
limits
for
those
new
and
existing
sources
using
capture
and
control
systems
are
given
in
Table
4
of
this
preamble.
The
survey
data
showed
no
appreciable
differences
in
substrates
coated,
coating
technologies
used,
or
the
applicability
of
control
measures
between
the
floor
sources
and
the
remaining
sources
in
each
subcategory
and
coating
segment.
After
the
floors
have
been
determined
for
new
or
reconstructed
and
existing
sources
in
a
source
category
or
subcategory,
we
must
set
emission
standards
that
are
technically
achievable
and
no
less
stringent
than
the
floors.
Such
standards
must
then
be
met
by
all
affected
sources
within
the
source
category
or
subcategory.
We
identify
and
consider
any
reasonable
regulatory
alternatives
that
are
beyondthe
floor,
taking
into
account
emissions
reductions,
cost,
non­
air
quality
health
and
environmental
impacts,
and
energy
requirements.
Different
beyond­
the­
floor
alternatives
may
be
considered
for
new
or
reconstructed
affected
sources
and
existing
affected
sources.
The
beyond­
the­
floor
option
considered
for
all
the
subcategories
and
for
both
new
and
existing
sources
was
requiring
the
use
of
capture
systems
and
add­
on
control
devices
for
all
metal
can
surface
coating
operations.
The
add­
on
control
device
chosen
for
the
beyondthe
floor
analysis
was
a
regenerative
thermal
oxidizer
(
RTO).
An
RTO
was
chosen
to
reflect
the
highest
emission
reduction
level
possible.
In
evaluating
the
beyond­
the­
floor
option,
we
calculated
the
additional
costs
and
emission
reductions
associated
with
the
use
of
a
capture
system
and
RTO.
We
calculated
the
cost
to
reduce
each
ton
of
organic
HAP
emissions
using
the
more
stringent
level
of
control.
Requiring
sources
to
meet
the
beyond­
the­
floor
level
would
result
in
an
estimated
additional
emissions
reduction
of
283
Mg/
yr
(
312
tpy)
at
an
estimated
cost
of
$
14.6
million
per
year
or
$
51,600
per
Mg
HAP
($
46,800
per
ton
HAP)
reduced.
Without
having
information
on
the
benefits
that
would
be
achieved
by
reducing
emissions
beyond­
the­
floor,
we
determined
that
the
additional
emission
reductions
that
could
be
achieved
do
not
warrant
the
costs
that
each
affected
source
would
incur
by
using
add­
on
controls.
Therefore,
we
are
not
requiring
beyond­
the­
floor
levels
of
emissions
reductions
at
this
time.
After
implementation
of
those
standards,
we
will
evaluate
the
health
and
environmental
risks
that
may
be
posed
as
a
result
of
exposure
to
emissions
from
the
metal
can
surface
coating
source
category.
At
that
time,
we
will
determine
whether
additional
control
is
warranted
in
light
of
the
available
risk
information.
We
note
here
that
our
assumption,
used
in
the
development
of
the
MACT
floors,
that
100
percent
of
the
organic
HAP
in
the
materials
used
are
emitted
by
the
affected
source
would
not
apply
when
the
source
sends
organic
HAP
waste
materials
to
a
facility
for
treatment
or
disposal.
We
made
that
assumption
because
the
industry
survey
responses
provided
little
information
as
to
the
amount
of
organic
HAP
recovered
and
recycled
or
treated
and
disposed
of
as
a
hazardous
waste.
We,
therefore,
concluded
that
the
practice
may
not
be
common
within
the
metal
can
surface
coating
industry.
We
recognize,
however,
that
some
metal
can
surface
coating
facilities
may
conduct
such
activities
and
should
be
allowed
to
account
for
such
activities
in
determining
their
emissions.
Thus,
the
proposed
rule
allows
you
to
reduce
the
organic
HAP
emissions
by
the
amount
of
any
organic
HAP
contained
in
waste
treated
or
disposed
of
at
a
hazardous
waste
treatment,
storage,
and
disposal
facility
that
is
regulated
under
40
CFR
part
262,
264,
265,
or
266.
The
alternative
capture/
control
efficiency
limit
of
95
percent
for
existing
sources
and
97
percent
for
new
or
reconstructed
sources,
and
the
20
parts
per
million
by
volume
HAP
outlet
concentration
limit
are
based
on
the
documented
emission
reductions
in
test
reports
provided
by
metal
can
facilities
and
the
EPA's
study
of
available
incinerator
technology,
cost,
and
energy
use.
We
are
requesting
specific
comment
on
the
usefulness
and
likelihood
of
the
proposed
alternative
limits
and
the
level
of
control
required
by
the
alternative
limits.

E.
How
Did
We
Select
the
Format
of
the
Standards?

We
selected
the
primary
format
of
the
standards
to
be
mass
of
HAP
per
volume
of
coating
solids.
We
selected
volume
of
coating
solids
to
normalize
the
rate
of
organic
HAP
emissions
across
all
sizes
and
types
of
coating
operations
and
facilities.
Volume
of
coating
solids
used
is
directly
related
to
the
surface
area
coated
and,
therefore,
provides
an
equitable
basis
of
comparison
for
all
coatings,
regardless
of
differences
in
coating
densities.
A
format
based
on
the
mass
or
weight
of
coating
solids
instead
of
volume
could
result
in
inequitable
standards
for
higher­
density
coatings
compared
to
coatings
with
lower
densities
per
unit
volume.
To
provide
compliance
flexibility,
we
also
provided
an
alternative
compliance
option
based
on
percent
reduction
achieved
by
a
capture
system
and
control
device
or
the
HAP
concentration
exiting
a
control
device.
We
selected
those
alternative
formats
because
they
would
achieve
equivalent
or
greater
HAP
emissions
reduction
at
those
facilities
using
capture/
control
systems
while
reducing
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
burden
for
those
facilities.
Those
alternative
limits
are
based
on
test
report
data
provided
by
industry
and
reflect
what
we
believe
to
be
the
achievable
level
of
control
available
with
control
devices
commonly
used
by
the
metal
can
surface
coating
industry.
Another
choice
for
the
format
of
the
standards
that
we
considered
but
rejected
was
a
usage
limit
(
mass
of
HAP
per
unit
of
production).
As
it
is
not
our
intent
to
limit
a
facility's
production
under
those
proposed
standards,
we
rejected
a
usage
limit.

VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00015
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2124
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
F.
How
Did
We
Select
the
Testing
and
Initial
Compliance
Requirements?

The
MACT
levels
of
control
can
be
achieved
in
several
different
ways.
Many
affected
sources
would
be
able
to
use
low­
or
no­
HAP
coatings,
although
they
may
not
be
available
to
meet
all
needs.
If
an
affected
source
also
uses
thinners
containing
organic
HAP,
it
may
be
able
to
switch
to
widely
available
low­
or
no­
HAP
thinners
to
reduce
organic
HAP
emissions
to
the
MACT
level
of
control.
Other
affected
sources
may
use
capture
systems
and
add­
on
control
devices,
either
alone
or
in
combination
with
low­
HAP
coatings,
to
reduce
emissions.
Reflecting
those
alternative
approaches,
the
proposed
standards
would
allow
you
to
choose
among
several
options
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
the
proposed
standards
for
organic
HAP,
using
coatings
and
thinners
with
low­
or
noorganic
HAP,
using
a
combination
of
low­
or
no­
HAP
coatings
and
emission
capture
and
control
devices,
or
using
emission
capture
and
control
devices
for
all
surface
coating
operations.
For
the
Compliant
Material
Option.
You
would
be
required
to
document
the
organic
HAP
content
of
all
coatings
and
show
that
each
is
less
than
the
applicable
emission
limit.
You
would
also
have
to
show
that
each
thinner
used
contains
no
organic
HAP.
Method
311
is
the
method
developed
by
EPA
for
determining
the
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP
in
coatings
and
has
been
used
in
previous
surface
coating
NESHAP.
We
have
not
identified
any
other
methods
that
provide
advantages
over
Method
311
for
use
in
the
proposed
standards.
Method
24
is
the
method
developed
by
EPA
for
determining
the
mass
fraction
of
volatile
matter
for
coatings
and
can
optionally
be
used
to
determine
the
nonaqueous
volatile
matter
content
as
a
surrogate
for
organic
HAP.
In
past
standards,
volatile
organic
compound
(
VOC)
emission
control
measures
have
been
implemented
in
coating
industries
with
Method
24
as
the
compliance
method.
We
have
not
identified
any
other
methods
that
provide
advantages
over
Method
24
for
use
in
the
proposed
standards.
The
proposed
methods
for
determining
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids
are
either
ASTM
Method
D2697
 
86(
1998)
or
ASTM
Method
D6093
 
97.
Those
are
voluntary
consensus
standards
(
VCS)
determined
to
be
appropriate
for
the
proposed
rule;
they
represent
the
consensus
of
coating
industry
and
other
experts
involved
in
their
development.
For
the
Emission
Rate
Without
Add­
On
Controls
Option.
To
demonstrate
initial
compliance
using
that
option,
you
would
calculate
the
total
organic
HAP
emission
rate
for
all
of
your
coating
operation(
s)
in
each
subcategory
and
coating
type
segment.
Total
organic
HAP
emission
rate
is
based
on
the
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
all
coatings
and
thinners
and
the
total
volume
of
coating
solids
used
during
the
initial
compliance
period.
You
would
be
required
to
demonstrate
that
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
does
not
exceed
the
applicable
emission
limit
using
the
methods
discussed
previously.
For
the
Emission
Rate
With
Add­
On
Controls
Option.
If
you
use
a
capture
system
and
control
device,
other
than
a
solvent
recovery
device
for
which
you
conduct
a
monthly
liquid­
liquid
material
balance,
you
would
be
required
to
conduct
an
initial
performance
test
of
the
system
to
determine
its
overall
control
efficiency.
For
a
solvent
recovery
system
for
which
you
conduct
a
liquid­
liquid
material
balance,
you
would
determine
the
quantity
of
volatile
matter
applied
and
the
quantity
recovered
during
the
initial
compliance
period
to
determine
its
overall
control
efficiency.
The
total
monthly
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
all
coatings
and
thinners
used
in
each
subcategory
or
coating
segment
with
controls
would
be
reduced
by
the
overall
control
efficiency.
That
reduced
value
for
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
would
then
be
used
with
the
values
from
the
preceding
11
months
to
calculate
the
12­
month
rolling
average
organic
HAP
emission
rate
in
kg
HAP/
liter
of
coating
solids
(
lb
HAP/
gal
of
coating
solids).
If
you
conduct
a
performance
test,
you
would
also
determine
parameter
operating
limits
during
the
test.
The
test
methods
that
the
proposed
standards
would
require
for
the
performance
test
have
been
required
under
many
standards
of
performance
for
industrial
surface
coating
sources
under
40
CFR
part
60
and
NESHAP
under
40
CFR
part
63.
We
have
not
identified
any
other
methods
that
provide
advantages
over
those
methods.
For
the
Capture
Efficiency/
Outlet
Concentration
Option.
If
you
use
a
capture
system
and
control
device
other
than
a
solvent
recovery
device
for
which
you
conduct
a
monthly
liquid­
liquid
material
balance,
you
would
be
required
to
conduct
an
initial
performance
test
of
the
system
to
determine
its
overall
control
efficiency
or
the
control
device
outlet
concentration
and
meet
the
same
initial
compliance
requirements
described
in
Option
3.
G.
How
Did
We
Select
the
Continuous
Compliance
Requirements?

To
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
with
the
emission
limits,
you
would
need
records
of
the
quantity
of
coatings
and
thinners
used
and
the
data
and
calculations
supporting
your
determination
of
their
organic
HAP
content.
If
you
conduct
liquid­
liquid
material
balances,
you
would
need
records
of
the
quantity
of
volatile
matter
used
and
the
quantity
recovered
by
the
solvent
recovery
systems
each
month.
To
ensure
continuous
compliance
with
the
proposed
organic
HAP
emission
limits
and
operating
limits,
the
proposed
standards
would
require
continuous
parameter
monitoring
of
capture
systems
and
control
devices
and
recordkeeping.
We
selected
the
following
requirements
based
on
reasonable
cost,
ease
of
execution,
and
usefulness
of
the
resulting
data
to
both
the
owners
or
operators
and
EPA
for
ensuring
continuous
compliance
with
the
emission
limits
and
operating
limits.
We
are
proposing
that
certain
parameters
be
continuously
monitored
for
the
types
of
capture
systems
and
control
devices
commonly
used
in
the
industry.
Those
monitoring
parameters
have
been
used
in
other
standards
for
similar
industries.
The
values
of
those
parameters
that
correspond
to
compliance
with
the
proposed
emission
limits
are
established
during
the
initial
or
most
recent
performance
test
that
demonstrates
compliance.
Those
values
are
your
operating
limits
for
the
capture
system
and
control
device.
You
would
be
required
to
determine
3­
hour
average
values
for
most
monitored
parameters
for
the
affected
source.
We
selected
that
averaging
period
to
reflect
operating
conditions
during
the
performance
test
to
ensure
the
control
system
is
continuously
operating
at
the
same
or
better
control
level
as
during
a
performance
test
demonstrating
compliance
with
the
emission
limits.

H.
How
Did
We
Select
the
Test
Methods
for
Determining
Compliance
With
the
Emission
Limits
Using
Add­
On
Control
Devices?

Today's
proposed
rule
would
require
you
to
conduct
performance
tests
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
the
compliance
options
using
add­
on
control
devices.
When
determining
compliance
with
options
using
add­
on
control
devices,
you
also
would
be
required
to
determine
the
capture
efficiency
of
the
associated
enclosures
if
the
enclosure
does
not
qualify
as
a
PTE.
The
test
methods
you
would
have
to
use
to
measure
those
pollutants
and
capture
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00016
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2125
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
efficiency
for
enclosures
are
discussed
below.
We
are
proposing
the
use
of
EPA
Method
25A,
``
Determination
of
Total
Gaseous
Organic
Matter
Concentration
Using
a
Flame
Ionization
Analyzer,''
for
measuring
THC
emissions
because
most
of
the
metal
can
facilities
that
are
already
required
to
measure
THC
emissions
use
that
method.
Also,
most
of
the
available
emissions
data
that
we
used
to
evaluate
THC
control
efficiencies
were
measured
using
Method
25A
and
reported
on
an
as
carbon
basis.
Method
25A
is
better
suited
than
EPA
Method
25,
``
Measurement
of
Total
Gaseous
Nonmethane
Organic
Emissions
as
Carbon
(
TGNMO),''
for
measuring
emission
streams
from
metal
can
coating
lines
which
typically
have
lower
THC
concentrations
(
less
than
50
parts
per
million)
and
relatively
high
moisture
contents.
However,
unlike
Method
25,
Method
25A
does
measure
methane
as
a
THC.
Because
many
of
the
wellcontrolled
metal
can
facilities
are
required
by
permit
to
reduce
VOC
emissions,
those
facilities
generally
are
allowed
to
subtract
methane
emissions
from
the
THC
measurement
when
reporting
VOC
emissions
because
methane
is
not
a
VOC,
according
to
EPA's
definition
of
VOC.
Therefore,
we
also
would
allow
you
to
subtract
methane
emissions
from
measured
THC
values
using
EPA
Method
18,
``
Measurement
of
Gaseous
Organic
Compound
Emissions
by
Gas
Chromotography.''
Method
18
is
a
selfvalidating
method.
We
are
proposing
the
use
of
EPA
Method
204,
``
Criteria
for
and
Verification
of
Permanent
or
Temporary
Total
Enclosure,''
and
Methods
204A
through
204F
for
determining
the
capture
efficiency
of
enclosures.
Methods
204A
through
204F
include
the
following:
Method
204A,
``
Volatile
Organic
Compounds
Content
In
Liquids
Input
Stream,''
Method
204B,
``
Volatile
Organic
Compounds
Emissions
In
Captured
Stream,''
Method
204C,
``
Volatile
Organic
Compounds
Emissions
In
Captured
Stream
(
Dilution
Technique),''
Method
204D,
``
Volatile
Organic
Compounds
Emissions
In
Uncaptured
Stream
From
Temporary
Total
Enclosure,''
Method
204E,
``
Volatile
Organic
Compounds
Emissions
In
Uncaptured
Stream
From
Building
Enclosure,''
and
Method
204F,
``
Volatile
Organic
Compounds
Content
In
Liquid
Input
Stream
(
Distillation
Approach).''
If
the
enclosure
meets
the
criteria
in
EPA
Method
204
for
a
PTE,
then
you
may
assume
that
its
capture
efficiency
is
100
percent.
If
the
enclosure
is
not
a
PTE,
then
you
would
have
to
build
a
temporary
total
enclosure
(
TTE)
around
it
that
meets
the
definition
of
a
TTE
in
EPA
Method
204,
and
you
would
be
required
to
determine
the
capture
efficiency
of
the
TTE
using
Methods
204A
through
204F
(
as
appropriate).
You
would
then
have
to
measure
emissions
from
both
the
control
device
and
the
TTE
and
use
the
combined
emissions
to
determine
compliance.
Industry
representatives
have
expressed
concern
with
using
EPA
Methods
204
and
204A
through
F
for
determining
capture
efficiency
of
coating
line
enclosures.
The
industry
representatives
have
indicated
that
some
facilities
may
have
difficulty
retrofitting
a
PTE
or
TTE
that
meets
the
EPA
Method
204
criteria.
Partial
enclosures
may
be
able
to
achieve
high
capture,
but
Methods
204
and
204A
through
F
are
the
only
available
methods
for
testing
the
efficiency
of
partial
enclosures.
We
recognize
the
need
for
flexibility
in
determination
of
capture
efficiency
for
metal
can
coating
line
enclosures
and
welcome
your
comments
on
alternative
approaches
for
determining
capture
efficiency.
Today's
proposed
rule
would
allow
facilities
to
petition
the
Administrator
for
use
of
alternative
test
methods.

I.
How
Did
We
Select
Notification,
Recordkeeping,
and
Reporting
Requirements?
You
would
be
required
to
comply
with
the
applicable
requirements
in
the
NESHAP
General
Provisions,
subpart
A
of
40
CFR
part
63,
as
described
in
Table
5
of
the
proposed
subpart
KKKK.
We
evaluated
the
General
Provisions
requirements
and
included
those
we
determined
to
be
the
minimum
notification,
recordkeeping,
and
reporting
necessary
to
ensure
compliance
with
and
effective
enforcement
of
the
proposed
standards,
modifying
them
as
appropriate
for
the
metal
can
surface
coating
category.

IV.
Summary
of
Environmental,
Energy,
and
Economic
Impacts
The
proposed
standards
would
affect
142
major
source
metal
can
surface
coating
facilities.
The
impacts
are
presented
relative
to
a
baseline
reflecting
the
level
of
control
prior
to
the
standards.
Due
to
consolidation
throughout
the
industry,
there
is
not
expected
to
be
any
net
growth
within
the
metal
can
surface
coating
industry
within
the
next
5
years.
Therefore,
the
estimate
of
the
impacts
is
presented
for
existing
facilities
only.
For
a
facility
that
is
already
in
compliance
with
the
standards,
only
monitoring,
recordkeeping,
and
reporting
cost
impacts
were
estimated.
For
more
information
on
how
impacts
were
estimated,
see
the
BID
(
EPA
 
453/
R
 
02
 
008).
The
outcome
of
two
delisting
petitions
that
have
been
submitted
to
EPA
could
significantly
affect
the
estimated
impacts
of
this
rulemaking.
These
petitions
are
the
petition
to
delist
EGBE
from
the
HAP
list
and
the
petition
to
delist
the
two­
piece
beverage
can
subcategory
from
the
source
category
list.
Both
petitions
are
being
reviewed
by
the
EPA.
If
granted,
the
delisting
of
either
EGBE
or
the
two­
piece
beverage
can
subcategory
could
affect
the
proposed
emission
limits
and
the
number
of
affected
sources.
Thus,
the
estimated
impacts
of
this
proposed
rule
could
change.
Once
decisions
on
the
petitions
are
finalized,
we
will
evaluate
whether
any
changes
to
the
proposed
rule
are
appropriate.

A.
What
Are
the
Air
Impacts?

The
proposed
emission
limits
are
expected
to
reduce
nationwide
organic
HAP
emissions
from
existing
major
affected
sources
by
approximately
6,160
Mg/
yr
(
6,800
tpy).
That
represents
a
reduction
of
71
percent
from
the
baseline
organic
HAP
emissions
of
8,700
Mg/
yr
(
9,600
tpy).
Table
5
of
this
preamble
gives
a
summary
of
the
primary
air
impacts
for
major
coating
segment
groupings
associated
with
implementation
of
the
proposed
rule.

TABLE
5.
 
SUMMARY
OF
PRIMARY
AIR
IMPACTS
BY
SUBCATEGORY
OR
COATING
SEGMENT
FOR
EXISTING
SOURCES
Subcategory
or
or
coating
segment
Emissions
before
NESHAP,
Mg/
yr
(
tpy)
Emissions
after
NESHAP,
Mg/
yr
(
tpy)
Emissions
reduction,
Mg/
yr
(
tpy)
Percent
reduction
Two­
piece
D&
I
beverage
can
body
coatings
...................................................
4,468
(
4,922)
1,644
(
1,811)
2,824
(
3,111)
63
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00017
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2126
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
TABLE
5.
 
SUMMARY
OF
PRIMARY
AIR
IMPACTS
BY
SUBCATEGORY
OR
COATING
SEGMENT
FOR
EXISTING
SOURCES
 
Continued
Subcategory
or
or
coating
segment
Emissions
before
NESHAP,
Mg/
yr
(
tpy)
Emissions
after
NESHAP,
Mg/
yr
(
tpy)
Emissions
reduction,
Mg/
yr
(
tpy)
Percent
reduction
Two­
piece
D&
I
food
can
body
coatings
...........................................................
765
(
843)
139
(
153)
626
(
690)
82
One­
piece
D&
I
aerosol
can
body
coatings
......................................................
16
(
18)
16
(
18)
0
(
0)
0
Sheetcoatings
..................................................................................................
2,289
(
2,522)
404
(
445)
1,885
(
2,077)
82
Three­
piece
food
can
assembly
coatings
........................................................
370
(
408)
285
(
314)
85
(
94)
23
Three­
piece
non­
food
can
assembly
coatings
.................................................
45
(
50)
38
(
42)
6
(
7)
14
End
lining
coatings
..........................................................................................
763
(
841)
34
(
38)
729
(
803)
95
Total
..........................................................................................................
8,718
(
9,603)
2,560
(
2,820)
6,158
(
6,783)
71
B.
What
Are
the
Cost
Impacts?

Cost
impacts
include
the
costs
of
recordkeeping
and
reporting,
capital
equipment
costs,
performance
testing
costs,
and
material
costs
as
facilities
comply
with
the
proposed
rule.
Recordkeeping
and
reporting
includes
all
labor
hours
related
to
the
tracking
of
coating
usage,
the
cost
of
purchasing
computer
equipment,
the
labor
hours
required
to
write
and
submit
reports,
and
the
labor
hours
required
to
train
coating
personnel.
Capital
equipment
costs
for
the
facilities
that
choose
to
use
capture
equipment
and
add­
on
control
devices
to
comply
with
the
proposed
rule
include
the
purchase,
installation,
and
operation
of
the
equipment.
Performance
testing
costs
for
the
facilities
that
choose
to
use
add­
on
control
devices
to
comply
with
the
standards
include
the
labor
hours
required
for
a
contractor
to
conduct
performance
testing
on
each
control
device
used
and
to
develop
the
associated
reports
for
recordkeeping
and
reporting
purposes.
Material
costs
include
the
cost
of
switching
to
low­
or
no­
HAP
coatings.
For
facilities
that
choose
to
use
low­
or
no­
HAP
coatings
to
comply
with
the
standards,
coatings
with
lower
HAP
content
are
considered
more
expensive
than
higher
HAP
content
coatings.
The
total
annualized
costs
for
the
142
existing
major
sources
are
estimated
at
$
56.2
million.
Those
estimates
are
broken
down
as
follows;
monitoring,
recordkeeping,
and
reporting
costs
would
contribute
$
7.3
million
to
the
overall
cost
of
the
NESHAP,
material
costs
would
contribute
$
4.1
million,
and
capital
equipment
costs
would
contribute
$
44.8
million
annually.
C.
What
Are
the
Economic
Impacts?
We
performed
an
EIA
to
provide
an
estimate
of
the
facility
and
market
impacts
of
the
proposed
standards
as
well
as
the
social
costs.
The
goal
of
the
EIA
is
to
estimate
the
market
response
of
the
metal
can
coating
and
production
facilities
to
the
proposed
regulation
and
to
determine
the
economic
effects
that
may
result
due
to
this
NESHAP.
The
metal
can
source
category
contains
189
potentially
affected
facilities
that
may
be
affected
by
the
proposed
rule.
The
potentially
affected
companies
are
owned
by
30
companies.
The
NAICS
code
that
describes
the
metal
can
manufacturing
industry
is
332431,
Metal
Can
Manufacturing.
Metal
can
production
leads
to
potential
HAP
emissions
during
the
can
coating
process
when
high
concentrations
of
organic
HAP
solvents
are
used
and
dispersed.
Emissions
are
generated
during
coating
application,
during
transportation
to
the
oven
(
evaporation),
and
during
curing.
The
compliance
costs
are
associated
with
chemical
substitution
during
the
coating
process,
the
installation
of
pollution
control
equipment,
and
recordkeeping
and
reporting
activities.
The
estimated
total
annualized
costs
for
the
NESHAP
are
$
56.2
million
per
year
divided
across
142
major
source
facilities.
In
terms
of
industry
impacts,
metal
can
producers
experience
a
total
projected
decrease
of
$
16
million
in
pretax
earnings
which
reflects
the
compliance
costs
associated
with
the
production
of
metal
cans
and
the
resulting
reductions
in
revenues
due
to
the
increase
in
the
prices
of
the
directly
affected
product
markets
and
reduced
quantities
purchased.
Through
the
market
impacts
described
above,
the
proposed
rule
will
create
both
gainers
and
losers
within
the
metal
can
industry.
Approximately
one­
third
of
the
modeled
facilities
experience
an
increase
in
pre­
tax
earnings
as
a
result
of
increases
in
price
that
exceed
their
compliance
costs
per
unit.
In
contrast,
the
remaining
two­
thirds
of
metal
can
facilities
experience
losses
in
pre­
tax
earnings.
In
addition,
the
EIA
indicates
that
none
of
the
facilities
within
the
metal
can
market
(
not
including
small
businesses)
are
at
risk
of
closure
because
of
the
proposed
standards.
Overall
employment
is
projected
to
decrease
by
176
employees,
which
represents
a
decrease
of
8 
10th
of
one
percent
as
a
result
of
the
proposed
rule.
Based
on
the
market
analysis,
the
total
social
cost
of
the
proposed
rule
is
projected
to
be
$
53.5
million.
The
estimated
social
costs
differ
slightly
from
the
projected
engineering
costs
because
social
costs
account
for
producer
and
consumer
behavior.
Consumers
are
projected
to
lose
$
33.3
million
or
60
percent
of
the
total
social
costs
of
the
proposed
rule.
Producers
will
lose
$
20.2
million,
or
40
percent
of
the
total
social
costs.
For
more
information,
consult
the
EIA
report
supporting
the
proposed
rule,
``
Economic
Impact
Analysis
of
Metal
Can
MACT
Standards''
(
EPA
 
452/
R
 
02
 
005).

D.
What
Are
the
Non­
Air
Health,
Environmental,
and
Energy
Impacts?

Based
on
information
from
the
industry
survey
responses,
we
found
no
indication
that
the
use
of
low
or
noorganic
HAP
content
coatings
and
thinners
at
existing
sources
would
result
in
any
increase
or
decrease
in
non­
air
health,
environmental,
and
energy
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00018
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2127
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
impacts.
There
would
be
no
change
in
utility
requirements
associated
with
the
use
of
these
materials
so
there
would
be
no
change
in
the
amount
of
energy
consumed
as
a
result
of
the
material
conversion.
Also,
there
would
be
no
significant
change
in
the
amount
of
materials
used
or
the
amount
of
waste
produced.
Since
many
facilities
in
the
D&
I
can
body
coating
and
sheetcoating
subcategories
currently
use
add­
on
emission
control
devices
to
meet
existing
requirements,
we
anticipate
that
facilities
in
those
subcategories
would
use
add­
on
controls
to
comply
with
the
proposed
standards.
Secondary
air
and
energy
impacts
would
result
from
fuel
combustion
needed
to
operate
these
control
devices
which
are
expected
to
be
RTO.
The
RTO
require
electricity
and
the
combustion
of
natural
gas
to
operate
and
maintain
operating
temperatures.
Byproducts
of
fuel
combustion
required
to
generate
electricity
and
maintain
RTO
operating
temperature
include
emission
of
carbon
monoxide,
nitrogen
oxides,
sulfur
dioxide,
and
particulate
matter
less
than
10
microns
in
diameter
(
PM10).
Assuming
the
electricity
required
for
RTO
operation
is
generated
at
coal­
fired
plants
built
since
1978
and
using
air
pollution­
42
emissions
factors,
generation
of
electricity
required
to
operate
RTO
at
all
affected
D&
I
can
body
coating
and
sheetcoating
facilities
would
result
in
the
following
increases
in
the
following
air
pollutants:
carbon
monoxide,
81
tpy;
nitrogen
oxides,
182
tpy;
sulfur
dioxide,
438
tpy;
and
PM10,
86
tpy.
Energy
impacts
include
the
consumption
of
electricity
and
natural
gas
needed
to
operate
RTO.
The
estimated
increase
in
electricity
consumption
from
the
operation
of
RTO
at
all
D&
I
can
body
coating
and
sheetcoating
facilities
is
36,730,000
kilowatt
hours
per
year.
Increased
fuel
energy
consumption
resulting
from
burning
natural
gas
would
be
1,197,000
megamillion
British
thermal
units
per
year.
No
significant
secondary
water
or
solid
waste
impacts
would
result
from
the
operation
of
emission
control
devices.

V.
Administrative
Requirements
A.
Executive
Order
12866,
Regulatory
Planning
and
Review
Under
Executive
Order
12866
(
58
FR
51735,
October
4,
1993),
EPA
must
determine
whether
the
regulatory
action
is
``
significant''
and,
therefore,
subject
to
Office
of
Management
and
Budget
(
OMB)
review
and
the
requirements
of
the
Executive
Order.
The
Executive
Order
defines
``
significant
regulatory
action''
as
one
that
is
likely
to
result
in
a
rule
that
may:
(
1)
Have
an
annual
effect
on
the
economy
of
$
100
million
or
more
or
adversely
affect
in
a
material
way
the
economy,
a
sector
of
the
economy,
productivity,
competition,
jobs,
the
environment,
public
health
or
safety,
or
State,
local,
or
tribal
governments
or
communities;
(
2)
create
a
serious
inconsistency
or
otherwise
interfere
with
an
action
taken
or
planned
by
another
agency;
(
3)
materially
alter
the
budgetary
impact
of
entitlements,
grants,
user
fees,
or
loan
programs
or
the
rights
and
obligation
of
recipients
thereof;
or
(
4)
raise
novel
legal
or
policy
issues
arising
out
of
legal
mandates,
the
President's
priorities,
or
the
principles
set
forth
in
the
Executive
Order.
It
has
been
determined
that
the
proposed
rule
is
not
a
``
significant
regulatory
action''
under
the
terms
of
Executive
Order
12866
and
is,
therefore,
not
subject
to
OMB
review.

B.
Executive
Order
13045,
Protection
of
Children
From
Environmental
Health
Risks
and
Safety
Risks
Executive
Order
13045,
``
Protection
of
Children
from
Environmental
Health
Risks
and
Safety
Risks''
(
62
FR
19885,
April
23,
1997)
applies
to
any
rule
that:
(
1)
Is
determined
to
be
``
economically
significant''
as
defined
under
Executive
Order
12866,
and
(
2)
concerns
an
environmental
health
or
safety
risk
that
EPA
has
reason
to
believe
may
have
a
disproportionate
effect
on
children.
If
the
regulatory
action
meets
both
criteria,
EPA
must
evaluate
the
environmental
health
or
safety
effects
of
the
planned
rule
on
children,
and
explain
why
the
planned
regulation
is
preferable
to
other
potentially
effective
and
reasonably
feasible
alternatives
considered
by
the
Agency.
The
EPA
interprets
Executive
Order
13045
as
applying
only
to
those
regulatory
actions
that
are
based
on
health
or
safety
risks,
such
that
the
analysis
required
under
section
5
 
501
of
the
Executive
Order
has
the
potential
to
influence
the
regulation.
The
proposed
rule
is
not
subject
to
Executive
Order
13045
because
it
is
based
on
technology
performance
and
not
on
health
or
safety
risks.

C.
Executive
Order
13132,
Federalism
Executive
Order
13132,
entitled
``
Federalism''
(
64
FR
43255,
August
10,
1999),
requires
EPA
to
develop
an
accountable
process
to
ensure
``
meaningful
and
timely
input
by
State
and
local
officials
in
the
development
of
regulatory
policies
that
have
federalism
implications.''
``
Policies
that
have
federalism
implications''
is
defined
in
the
Executive
Order
to
include
rules
that
have
``
substantial
direct
effects
on
the
States,
on
the
relationship
between
the
national
government
and
the
States,
or
on
the
distribution
of
power
and
responsibilities
among
the
various
levels
of
government.''
The
proposed
rule
does
not
have
federalism
implications.
It
would
not
have
substantial
direct
effects
on
the
States,
on
the
relationship
between
the
national
government
and
the
States,
or
on
the
distribution
of
power
and
responsibilities
among
the
various
levels
of
government,
as
specified
in
Executive
Order
13132.
Thus,
Executive
Order
13132
does
not
apply
to
the
proposed
rule.
Although
section
6
of
Executive
Order
13132
does
not
apply
to
the
proposed
rule,
EPA
did
consult
with
State
and
local
officials
to
enable
them
to
provide
timely
input
in
the
development
of
the
proposed
rule.
In
the
spirit
of
Executive
Order
13132,
and
consistent
with
EPA
policy
to
promote
communications
between
EPA
and
State
and
local
governments,
EPA
specifically
solicits
comment
on
the
proposed
rule
from
State
and
local
officials.

D.
Executive
Order
13175,
Consultation
and
Coordination
With
Indian
Tribal
Governments
Executive
Order
13175,
entitled
``
Consultation
and
Coordination
with
Indian
Tribal
Governments''
(
65
FR
67249,
November
9,
2000),
requires
EPA
to
develop
an
accountable
process
to
ensure
``
meaningful
and
timely
input
by
tribal
officials
in
the
development
of
regulatory
policies
that
have
tribal
implications.''
The
proposed
rule
does
not
have
tribal
implications,
as
specified
in
Executive
Order
13175.
No
tribal
governments
own
or
operate
metal
can
surface
coating
operations.
Thus,
Executive
Order
13175
does
not
apply
to
the
proposed
rule.

E.
Executive
Order
13211,
Actions
Concerning
Regulations
That
Significantly
Affect
Energy
Supply,
Distribution,
or
Use
The
proposed
rule
is
not
subject
to
Executive
Order
13211
(
66
FR
28355,
May
22,
2001)
because
it
is
not
a
significant
regulatory
action
under
Executive
Order
12866.

F.
Unfunded
Mandates
Reform
Act
of
1995
Title
II
of
the
Unfunded
Mandates
Reform
Act
of
1995
(
UMRA),
Pub.
L.
104
 
4,
establishes
requirements
for
Federal
agencies
to
assess
the
effects
of
their
regulatory
actions
on
State,
local,

VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00019
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2128
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
and
tribal
governments
and
the
private
sector.
Under
Section
202
of
the
UMRA,
EPA
generally
must
prepare
a
written
statement,
including
a
cost­
benefit
analysis,
for
proposed
and
final
rules
with
``
Federal
mandates''
that
may
result
in
expenditures
to
State,
local,
and
tribal
governments,
in
aggregate,
or
to
the
private
sector,
of
$
100
million
or
more
in
any
1
year.
Before
promulgating
an
EPA
rule
for
which
a
written
statement
is
needed,
section
205
of
the
UMRA
generally
requires
EPA
to
identify
and
consider
a
reasonable
number
of
regulatory
alternatives
and
adopt
the
least
costly,
most
costeffective
or
least
burdensome
alternative
that
achieves
the
objectives
of
the
rule.
The
provisions
of
section
205
do
not
apply
when
they
are
inconsistent
with
applicable
law.
Moreover,
section
205
allows
EPA
to
adopt
an
alternative
other
than
the
least
costly,
most
cost­
effective,
or
least
burdensome
alternative
if
the
Administrator
publishes
with
the
final
rule
an
explanation
why
that
alternative
was
not
adopted.
Before
EPA
establishes
any
regulatory
requirements
that
may
significantly
or
uniquely
affect
small
governments,
including
tribal
governments,
it
must
have
developed
under
section
203
of
the
UMRA
a
small
government
agency
plan.
The
plan
must
provide
for
notifying
potentially
affected
small
governments,
enabling
officials
of
affected
small
governments
to
have
meaningful
and
timely
input
in
the
development
of
EPA
regulatory
proposals
with
significant
Federal
intergovernmental
mandates,
and
informing,
educating,
and
advising
small
governments
on
compliance
with
the
regulatory
requirements.
The
EPA
has
determined
that
the
proposed
rule
does
not
contain
a
Federal
mandate
that
may
result
in
expenditures
of
$
100
million
or
more
for
State,
local,
and
tribal
governments,
in
the
aggregate,
or
the
private
sector
in
any
1
year.
The
maximum
total
annualized
cost
of
the
proposed
rule
for
any
year
has
been
estimated
to
be
less
than
$
56.2
million.
Thus,
today's
proposed
rule
is
not
subject
to
the
requirements
of
sections
202
and
205
of
the
UMRA.
In
addition,
the
EPA
has
determined
that
the
proposed
rule
contains
no
regulatory
requirements
that
might
significantly
or
uniquely
affect
small
governments
because
it
contains
no
requirements
that
apply
to
such
governments
or
impose
obligations
upon
them.
Therefore,
today's
proposed
rule
is
not
subject
to
the
requirements
of
section
203
of
UMRA.
G.
Regulatory
Flexibility
Act
(
RFA),
as
Amended
by
the
Small
Business
Regulatory
Enforcement
Fairness
Act
of
1996
(
SBREFA),
5
U.
S.
C.
601,
et
seq.

The
RFA
generally
requires
an
agency
to
prepare
a
regulatory
flexibility
analysis
of
any
rule
subject
to
notice
and
comment
rulemaking
requirements
under
the
Administrative
Procedure
Act
or
any
other
statute
unless
the
EPA
certifies
that
the
rule
will
not
have
a
significant
economic
impact
on
a
substantial
number
of
small
entities.
Small
entities
include
small
business,
small
organizations,
and
small
governmental
jurisdictions.
For
purposes
of
assessing
the
impacts
of
today's
proposed
rule
on
small
entities,
small
entity
is
defined
as:
(
1)
A
small
business
according
to
the
Small
Business
Administration
(
SBA)
size
standards
by
NAICS
code;
(
2)
a
small
governmental
jurisdiction
that
is
a
government
of
a
city,
county,
town,
school
district
or
special
district
with
a
population
of
less
than
50,000;
and
(
3)
a
small
organization
that
is
any
not­
forprofit
enterprise
which
is
independently
owned
and
operated
and
is
not
dominant
in
its
field.
In
accordance
with
the
RFA,
EPA
conducted
an
assessment
of
the
proposed
standards
on
small
businesses
within
the
metal
can
industry.
Based
on
SBA
NAICS­
based
size
definitions
and
reported
sales
and
employment
data,
EPA
identified
13
small
business,
or
43.3
percent
of
the
metal
can
companies.
Small
businesses
are
expected
to
incur
only
2
percent
of
the
total
industry
annualized
compliance
costs
of
$
56.2
million.
The
EPA
estimates
that
10
of
the
13
small
businesses
will
experience
an
impact
less
than
1
percent
of
total
company
sales,
two
small
firms
will
experience
impacts
between
1
and
3
percent,
and
one
firm
will
experience
an
impact
of
more
than
3
percent
of
sales.
Consequently,
one
of
the
15
facilities
owned
by
small
businesses
is
likely
to
prematurely
close
as
a
result
of
the
proposed
rule.
For
more
information,
consult
the
EIA
report
entitled
``
Economic
Impact
Analysis
for
the
Proposed
Metal
Can
NESHAP''
in
Docket
A
 
98
 
41.
After
considering
the
economic
impact
of
today's
proposed
rule
on
small
entities,
I
certify
that
this
action
will
not
have
a
significant
economic
impact
on
a
substantial
number
of
small
entities.

H.
Paperwork
Reduction
Act
The
information
collection
requirements
in
the
proposed
rule
have
been
submitted
for
approval
to
OMB
under
the
Paperwork
Reduction
Act,
44
U.
S.
C.
3501,
et
seq.
An
Information
Collection
Request
(
ICR)
document
has
been
prepared
by
EPA
(
ICR
No.
2079
 
01)
and
a
copy
may
be
obtained
from
Susan
Auby
by
mail
at
the
U.
S.
EPA,
Collection
Strategies
Division
(
2822T),
1200
Pennsylvania
Avenue,
NW.,
Washington,
DC
20460,
by
email
at
auby.
susan@
epa.
gov,
or
by
calling
(
202)
566
 
1672.
A
copy
may
also
be
downloaded
off
the
internet
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
icr.
The
information
requirements
are
based
on
notification,
recordkeeping,
and
reporting
requirements
in
the
NESHAP
General
Provisions
(
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
A)
which
are
mandatory
for
all
operators
subject
to
national
emission
standards.
Those
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
are
specifically
authorized
by
section
114
of
the
CAA
(
42
U.
S.
C.
7414).
All
information
submitted
to
the
EPA
pursuant
to
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
for
which
a
claim
of
confidentiality
is
made
is
safeguarded
according
to
EPA
policies
set
forth
in
40
CFR
part
2,
subpart
B.
The
proposed
standards
would
require
maintaining
records
of
all
coating
and
thinning
materials
data
and
calculations
used
to
determine
compliance.
That
information
includes
the
amount
(
kg)
used
during
each
12­
month
compliance
period,
mass
fraction
organic
HAP,
and,
for
coating
materials
only,
mass
fraction
of
solids.
If
an
add­
on
control
device
is
used,
records
must
be
kept
of
the
capture
efficiency
of
the
capture
system,
destruction
or
removal
efficiency
of
the
add­
on
control
device,
and
the
monitored
operating
parameters.
In
addition,
records
must
be
kept
of
each
calculation
of
the
affected
sourcewide
emissions
for
each
monthly
and
rolling
12­
month
compliance
period
and
all
data,
calculations,
test
results,
and
other
supporting
information
used
to
determine
this
value.
The
recordkeeping
requirements
are
only
for
the
specific
information
needed
to
determine
compliance.
The
annual
monitoring,
reporting,
and
recordkeeping
burden
for
this
collection
(
averaged
over
the
first
3
years
after
the
effective
date
of
the
promulgated
rule)
is
estimated
to
be
approximately
1,815
labor
hours
per
year
at
a
total
annual
cost
of
$
545,000.
That
estimate
includes
a
one­
time
performance
test
and
report
(
with
repeat
tests
where
needed);
onetime
submission
of
a
SSMP
with
semiannual
reports
for
any
event
when
the
procedures
in
the
plan
were
not
followed;
semiannual
compliance
status
reports;
and
recordkeeping.
There
are
no
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00020
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2129
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
capital/
startup
costs
associated
with
the
monitoring
requirements.
Burden
means
the
total
time,
effort,
or
financial
resources
expended
by
persons
to
generate,
maintain,
retain,
or
disclose
or
provide
information
to
or
for
a
Federal
agency.
That
includes
the
time
needed
to
review
instructions;
develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purposes
of
collecting,
validating,
and
verifying
information,
processing
and
maintaining
information,
and
disclosing
and
providing
information;
adjust
the
existing
ways
to
comply
with
any
previously
applicable
instructions
and
requirements;
train
personnel
to
be
able
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information;
search
data
sources;
complete
and
review
the
collection
of
information;
and
transmit
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.
An
agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
currently
valid
OMB
control
number.
The
OMB
control
numbers
for
EPA's
rules
are
listed
in
40
CFR
part
9
and
48
CFR
chapter
15.
Comments
are
requested
on
the
EPA's
need
for
the
information,
the
accuracy
of
the
provided
burden
estimates,
and
any
suggested
methods
for
minimizing
respondent
burden,
including
through
the
use
of
automated
collection
techniques.
By
U.
S.
Postal
Service,
send
comments
on
the
ICR
to
the
Director,
Collection
Strategies
Division,
U.
S.
EPA
(
2822T),
1200
Pennsylvania
Avenue,
NW.,
Washington,
DC
20460;
or
by
courier,
send
comments
on
the
ICR
to
the
Director,
Collection
Strategies
Division,
U.
S.
EPA
(
2822T),
1301
Constitution
Avenue,
NW.,
Room
6143,
Washington,
DC
20460
((
202)
566
 
1700)),
marked
``
Attention:
Desk
Officer
for
EPA.''
Include
the
ICR
number
in
any
correspondence.
Since
OMB
is
required
to
make
a
decision
concerning
the
ICR
between
30
and
60
days
after
January
15,
2003,
a
comment
to
OMB
is
best
assured
of
having
its
full
effect
if
OMB
receives
it
by
February
14,
2003.
The
final
rule
will
respond
to
any
OMB
or
public
comments
on
the
information
collection
requirements
contained
in
the
proposal.

I.
National
Technology
Transfer
and
Advancement
Act
Section
12(
d)
of
the
National
Technology
Transfer
and
Advancement
Act
of
1995
(
NTTAA),
Public
Law
104
 
113,
§
12(
d)
(
15
U.
S.
C.
272
note)
directs
EPA
to
use
VCS
in
their
regulatory
activities
unless
to
do
so
would
be
inconsistent
with
applicable
law
or
otherwise
impractical.
The
VCS
are
technical
standards
(
e.
g.,
materials
specifications,
test
methods,
sampling
procedures,
and
business
practices)
that
are
developed
or
adopted
by
VCS
bodies.
The
NTTAA
directs
EPA
to
provide
Congress,
through
OMB,
explanations
when
the
Agency
decides
not
to
use
available
and
applicable
VCS.
This
proposed
rulemaking
involves
technical
standards.
The
EPA
cites
the
following
standards
in
this
rule:
EPA
Methods
1,
1A,
2,
2A,
2C,
2D,
2F,
2G,
3,
3A,
3B,
4,
24,
25,
25A,
204,
204A
through
F,
and
311.
Consistent
with
the
NTTAA,
EPA
conducted
searches
to
identify
VCS
in
addition
to
these
EPA
methods/
performance
specifications.
No
applicable
VCS
were
identified
for
EPA
Methods
1A,
2A,
2D,
2F,
2G,
204,
204A
through
204F,
and
311.
The
search
and
review
results
have
been
documented
and
are
placed
in
the
docket
(
A
 
98
 
41)
for
the
proposed
rule.
Three
VCS
described
below
were
identified
as
acceptable
alternatives
to
EPA
test
methods
for
the
purposes
of
the
proposed
rule.
The
VCS
ASME
PTC
19
 
10
 
1981
 
Part
10,
``
Flue
and
Exhaust
Gas
Analyses,''
is
cited
in
the
proposed
rule
for
its
manual
method
for
measuring
the
oxygen,
carbon
dioxide,
and
carbon
monoxide
content
of
exhaust
gas.
That
part
of
ASME
PTC
19
 
10
 
1981
 
Part
10
is
an
acceptable
alternative
to
Method
3B.
The
two
VCS,
ASTM
D2697
 
86
(
Reapproved
1998),
``
Standard
Test
Method
for
Volume
Nonvolatile
Matter
in
Clear
or
Pigmented
Coatings''
and
ASTM
D6093
 
97,
``
Standard
Test
Method
for
Percent
Volume
Nonvolatile
Matter
in
Clear
or
Pigmented
Coatings
Using
a
Helium
Gas
Pycnometer,''
are
cited
in
the
proposed
rule
as
acceptable
alternatives
to
EPA
Method
24
to
determine
the
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids.
Currently,
EPA
Method
24
does
not
have
a
procedure
for
determining
the
volume
of
solids
in
coatings.
Those
standards
augment
the
procedures
in
Method
24,
which
currently
states
that
volume
solids
content
be
calculated
from
the
coating
manufacturer's
formulation.
Six
VCS:
ASTM
D1475
 
90,
ASTM
D2369
 
95,
ASTM
D3792
 
91,
ASTM
D4017
 
96a,
ASTM
D4457
 
85
(
Reapproved
91),
and
ASTM
D5403
 
93
are
already
incorporated
by
reference
(
IBR)
in
EPA
Method
24.
Five
VCS:
ASTM
D1979
 
91,
ASTM
D3432­
89,
ASTM
D4747
 
87,
ASTM
D4827
 
93,
and
ASTM
PS9
 
94
are
IBR
in
EPA
Method
311.
In
addition
to
the
VCS
EPA
uses
in
the
proposed
rule,
the
search
for
emissions
measurement
procedures
identified
14
other
VCS.
The
EPA
determined
that
11
of
those
14
standards
identified
for
measuring
emissions
of
the
HAP
or
surrogates
subject
to
emission
standards
in
the
proposed
rule
were
impractical
alternatives
to
EPA
test
methods
for
the
purposes
of
the
proposed
rule.
Therefore,
EPA
does
not
intend
to
adopt
those
standards
for
that
purpose.
The
reasons
for
the
determination
for
the
11
methods
are
discussed
below.
The
VCS
ASTM
D3154
 
00,
``
Standard
Method
for
Average
Velocity
in
a
Duct
(
Pitot
Tube
Method),''
is
impractical
as
an
alternative
to
EPA
Methods
1,
2,
2C,
3,
3B,
and
4
for
the
purposes
of
the
proposed
rulemaking
since
the
standard
appears
to
lack
in
quality
control
and
quality
assurance
requirements.
Specifically,
ASTM
D3154
 
00
does
not
include
the
following:
(
1)
Proof
that
openings
of
standard
pitot
tube
have
not
plugged
during
the
test,
(
2)
if
differential
pressure
gauges
other
than
inclined
manometers
(
e.
g.,
magnehelic
gauges)
are
used,
their
calibration
must
be
checked
after
each
test
series,
and
(
3)
the
frequency
and
validity
range
for
calibration
of
the
temperature
sensors.
The
VCS
ASTM
D3464
 
96
(
2001),
``
Standard
Test
Method
Average
Velocity
in
a
Duct
Using
a
Thermal
Anemometer,''
is
impractical
as
an
alternative
to
EPA
Method
2
for
the
purposes
of
the
proposed
rulemaking
primarily
because
applicability
specifications
are
not
clearly
defined,
e.
g.,
range
of
gas
composition,
temperature
limits.
Also,
the
lack
of
supporting
quality
assurance
data
for
the
calibration
procedures
and
specifications,
and
certain
variability
issues
that
are
not
adequately
addressed
by
the
standard
limit
EPA's
ability
to
make
a
definitive
comparison
of
the
method
in
those
areas.
The
VCS
ISO
10780:
1994,
``
Stationary
Source
Emissions­
Measurement
of
Velocity
and
Volume
Flowrate
of
Gas
Streams
in
Ducts,''
is
impractical
as
an
alternative
to
EPA
Method
2
in
the
proposed
rulemaking.
The
standard
recommends
the
use
of
an
L­
shaped
pitot
which
historically
has
not
been
recommended
by
EPA.
The
EPA
specifies
the
S­
type
design
which
has
large
openings
that
are
less
likely
to
plug
up
with
dust.
The
VCS,
CAN/
CSA
Z223.2
 
M86(
1986),
``
Method
for
the
Continuous
Measurement
of
Oxygen,
Carbon
Dioxide,
Carbon
Monoxide,
Sulphur
Dioxide,
and
Oxides
of
Nitrogen
in
Enclosed
Combustion
Flue
Gas
Streams,''
is
unacceptable
as
a
substitute
for
EPA
Method
3A
since
it
does
not
include
quantitative
specifications
for
measurement
system
performance,
most
notably
the
calibration
procedures
and
instrument
performance
characteristics.

VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00021
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2130
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
The
instrument
performance
characteristics
that
are
provided
are
nonmandatory
and
also
do
not
provide
the
same
level
of
quality
assurance
as
the
EPA
methods.
For
example,
the
zero
and
span/
calibration
drift
is
only
checked
weekly,
whereas
the
EPA
methods
require
drift
checks
after
each
run.
Two
very
similar
standards,
ASTM
D5835
 
95,
``
Standard
Practice
for
Sampling
Stationary
Source
Emissions
for
Automated
Determination
of
Gas
Concentration,''
and
ISO
10396:
1993,
``
Stationary
Source
Emissions:
Sampling
for
the
Automated
Determination
of
Gas
Concentrations,''
are
impractical
alternatives
to
EPA
Method
3A
for
the
purposes
of
the
proposed
rulemaking
because
they
lack
in
detail
and
quality
assurance/
quality
control
requirements.
Specifically,
those
two
standards
do
not
include
the
following:
(
1)
Sensitivity
of
the
method,
(
2)
acceptable
levels
of
analyzer
calibration
error,
(
3)
acceptable
levels
of
sampling
system
bias,
(
4)
zero
drift
and
calibration
drift
limits,
time
span,
and
required
testing
frequency,
(
5)
a
method
to
test
the
interference
response
of
the
analyzer,
(
6)
procedures
to
determine
the
minimum
sampling
time
per
run
and
minimum
measurement
time,
and
(
7)
specifications
for
data
recorders
in
terms
of
resolution
(
all
types)
and
recording
intervals
(
digital
and
analog
recorders
only).
The
VCS
ISO
12039:
2001,
``
Stationary
Source
Emissions
 
Determination
of
Carbon
Monoxide,
Carbon
Dioxide,
and
Oxygen
 
Automated
Methods,''
is
not
acceptable
as
an
alternative
to
EPA
Method
3A.
The
ISO
standard
is
similar
to
EPA
Method
3A,
but
is
missing
some
key
features.
In
terms
of
sampling,
the
hardware
required
by
ISO
12039:
2001
does
not
include
a
three­
way
calibration
valve
assembly
or
equivalent
to
block
the
sample
gas
flow
while
calibration
gases
are
introduced.
In
its
calibration
procedures,
ISO
12039:
2001
only
specifies
a
two­
point
calibration
while
EPA
Method
3A
specifies
a
three­
point
calibration.
Also,
ISO
12039:
2001
does
not
specify
performance
criteria
for
calibration
error,
calibration
drift,
or
sampling
system
bias
tests,
as
in
the
EPA
method,
although
checks
of
those
quality
control
features
are
required
by
the
ISO
standard.
The
VCS
ISO
11890
 
1
(
2000)
Part
1,
``
Paints
and
Varnishes
 
Determination
of
Volatile
Organic
Compound
(
VOC)
Content
 
Difference
Method,''
is
impractical
as
an
alternative
to
EPA
Method
24
because
measured
nonvolatile
matter
content
can
vary
with
experimental
factors
such
as
temperature,
length
of
heating
period,
size
of
weighing
dish,
and
size
of
sample.
The
standard
ISO
11890
 
1
allows
for
different
dish
weights
and
sample
sizes
than
the
one
size
(
58
millimeters
in
diameter
and
sample
size
of
0.5
gram)
of
EPA
Method
24.
The
standard
ISO
11890
 
1
also
allows
for
different
oven
temperatures
and
heating
times
depending
on
the
type
of
coating,
whereas
EPA
Method
24
requires
60
minutes
heating
at
110
degrees
Celsius
at
all
times.
Because
the
EPA
Method
24
test
conditions
and
procedures
define
volatile
matter,
ISO
11890
 
1
is
unacceptable
as
an
alternative
because
of
its
different
test
conditions.
The
VCS
ISO
11890
 
2
(
2000)
Part
2,
``
Paints
and
Varnishes
 
Determination
of
Volatile
Organic
Compound
(
VOC)
Content
 
Gas
Chromatographic
Method,''
is
impractical
as
an
alternative
to
EPA
Method
24
because
ISO
11890
 
2
only
measures
the
VOC
added
to
the
coating
and
would
not
measure
any
VOC
generated
from
the
curing
of
the
coating.
The
EPA
Method
24
does
measure
cure
VOC,
which
can
be
significant
in
some
cases,
and,
therefore,
ISO
11890
 
2
is
not
an
acceptable
alternative
to
this
EPA
method.
Two
VCS,
EN
12619:
1999
``
Stationary
Source
Emissions
 
Determination
of
the
Mass
Concentration
of
Total
Gaseous
Organic
Carbon
at
Low
Concentrations
in
Flue
Gases
 
Continuous
Flame
Ionization
Detector
Method''
and
ISO
14965:
2000(
E)
``
Air
Quality
 
Determination
of
Total
Nonmethane
Organic
Compounds
 
Cryogenic
Preconcentration
and
Direct
Flame
Ionization
Method,''
are
impractical
alternatives
to
EPA
Method
25
and
25A
for
the
purposes
of
the
proposed
rulemaking
because
the
standards
do
not
apply
to
solvent
process
vapors
in
concentrations
greater
than
40
ppm
(
EN
12619)
and
10
ppm
carbon
(
ISO
14965).
Methods
whose
upper
limits
are
that
low
are
too
limited
to
be
useful
in
measuring
source
emissions,
which
are
expected
to
be
much
higher.
Three
of
the
14
VCS
identified
in
the
search
were
not
available
at
the
time
the
review
was
conducted
for
the
purposes
of
the
proposed
rule
because
they
are
under
development
by
a
VCS
body:
ASME/
BSR
MFC
13M,
``
Flow
Measurement
by
Velocity
Traverse,''
for
EPA
Method
2
(
and
possibly
1);
ASME/
BSR
MFC
12M,
``
Flow
in
Closed
Conduits
Using
Multiport
Averaging
Pitot
Primary
Flowmeters,''
for
EPA
Method
2;
and
ISO/
CD
17895,
``
Paints
and
Varnishes
 
Determination
of
the
Volatile
Organic
Compound
Content
of
Water­
based
Emulsion
Paints,''
for
EPA
Method
24.
Listed
in
40
CFR
63.3541,
63.3551,
63.3561,
63.3564,
63.3565,
63.3566,
63.3571,
63.3574,
63.3575,
and
63.3576
to
subpart
KKKK
of
the
proposed
standards
are
the
EPA
testing
methods
included
in
the
regulation.
Under
40
CFR
63.7(
f)
and
40
CFR
63.8(
f)
of
subpart
A
of
the
General
Provisions,
a
source
may
apply
to
EPA
for
permission
to
use
alternative
test
methods
or
alternative
monitoring
requirements
in
place
of
any
of
the
EPA
testing
methods,
performance
specifications,
or
procedures.

List
of
Subjects
in
40
CFR
Part
63
Environmental
protection,
Administrative
practice
and
procedure,
Air
pollution
control,
Hazardous
substances,
Reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements.

Dated:
November
26,
2002.
Christine
Todd
Whitman,
Administrator.

For
the
reasons
stated
in
the
preamble,
title
40,
chapter
I,
part
63
of
the
Code
of
Federal
Regulations
is
proposed
to
be
amended
as
follows:

PART
63
 
[
AMENDED]

1.
The
authority
citation
for
part
63
continues
to
read
as
follows:

Authority:
42
U.
S.
C.
7401,
et
seq.

2.
Part
63
is
amended
by
adding
subpart
KKKK
to
read
as
follows:

Subpart
KKKK
 
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants:
Surface
Coating
of
Metal
Cans
Sec.

What
this
Subpart
Covers
63.3480
What
is
the
purpose
of
this
subpart?
63.3481
Am
I
subject
to
this
subpart?
63.3482
What
parts
of
my
plant
does
this
subpart
cover?
63.3483
When
do
I
have
to
comply
with
this
subpart?

Emission
Limitations
63.3490
What
emission
limits
must
I
meet?
63.3491
What
are
my
options
for
meeting
the
emission
limits?
63.3492
What
operating
limits
must
I
meet?
63.3493
What
work
practice
standards
must
I
meet?

General
Compliance
Requirements
63.3500
What
are
my
general
requirements
for
complying
with
this
subpart?
63.3501
What
parts
of
the
General
Provisions
apply
to
me?

Notifications,
Reports,
and
Records
63.3510
What
notifications
must
I
submit?
63.3520
What
reports
must
I
submit?
63.3530
What
records
must
I
keep?

VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00022
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2131
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
63.3531
In
what
form
and
for
how
long
must
I
keep
my
records?

Compliance
Requirements
for
the
Compliant
Material
Option
63.3540
By
what
date
must
I
conduct
the
initial
compliance
demonstration?
63.3541
How
do
I
demonstrate
initial
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations?
63.3542
How
do
I
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations?

Compliance
Requirements
for
the
Emission
Rate
Without
Add­
On
Controls
Option
63.3550
By
what
date
must
I
conduct
the
initial
compliance
demonstration?
63.3551
How
do
I
demonstrate
initial
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations?
63.3552
How
do
I
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations?

Compliance
Requirements
for
the
Emission
Rate
With
Add­
On
Controls
Option
63.3560
By
what
date
must
I
conduct
performance
tests
and
other
initial
compliance
demonstrations?
63.3561
How
do
I
demonstrate
initial
compliance?
63.3562
[
Reserved]
63.3563
How
do
I
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations?
63.3564
What
are
the
general
requirements
for
performance
tests?
63.3565
How
do
I
determine
the
emission
capture
system
efficiency?
63.3566
How
do
I
determine
the
add­
on
control
device
emission
destruction
or
removal
efficiency?
63.3567
How
do
I
establish
the
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
operating
limits
during
the
performance
test?
63.3568
What
are
the
requirements
for
continuous
parameter
monitoring
system
installation,
operation,
and
maintenance?

Compliance
Requirements
for
the
Control
Efficiency/
Outlet
Concentration
Option
63.3570
By
what
date
must
I
conduct
performance
tests
and
other
initial
compliance
demonstrations?
63.3571
How
do
I
demonstrate
initial
compliance?
63.3572
[
Reserved]
63.3573
How
do
I
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations?
63.3574
What
are
the
general
requirements
for
performance
tests?
63.3575
How
do
I
determine
the
emission
capture
system
efficiency?
63.3576
How
do
I
determine
the
add­
on
control
device
emission
destruction
or
removal
efficiency?
63.3577
How
do
I
establish
the
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
operating
limits
during
the
performance
test?
63.3578
What
are
the
requirements
for
continuous
parameter
monitoring
system
installation,
operation,
and
maintenance?

Other
Requirements
and
Information
63.3580
Who
implements
and
enforces
this
subpart?
63.3581
What
definitions
apply
to
this
subpart?

Tables
to
Subpart
KKKK
of
Part
63
Table
1
to
Subpart
KKKK
of
Part
63
Emission
Limits
for
New
or
Reconstructed
Affected
Sources
Table
2
to
Subpart
KKKK
of
Part
63
Emission
Limits
for
Existing
Affected
Sources
Table
3
to
Subpart
KKKK
of
Part
63
Emission
Limits
for
Affected
Sources
Using
the
Control
Efficiency/
Outlet
Concentration
Compliance
Option
Table
4
to
Subpart
KKKK
of
Part
63
Operating
Limits
if
Using
the
Emission
Rate
with
Add­
on
Controls
Option
or
the
Control
Efficiency/
Outlet
Concentration
Compliance
Option
Table
5
to
Subpart
KKKK
of
Part
63
Applicability
of
General
Provisions
to
Subpart
KKKK
Table
6
to
Subpart
KKKK
of
Part
63
Default
Organic
HAP
Mass
Fraction
for
Solvents
and
Solvent
Blends
Table
7
to
Subpart
KKKK
of
Part
63
Default
Organic
HAP
Mass
Fraction
for
Petroleum
Solvent
Groups
What
This
Subpart
Covers
§
63.3480
What
is
the
purpose
of
this
subpart?
This
subpart
establishes
national
emission
standards
for
hazardous
air
pollutants
(
NESHAP)
for
metal
can
surface
coating
facilities.
This
subpart
also
establishes
requirements
to
demonstrate
initial
and
continuous
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations.

§
63.3481
Am
I
subject
to
this
subpart?
(
a)
Except
as
provided
in
paragraph
(
c)
of
this
section,
the
source
category
to
which
this
subpart
applies
is
surface
coating
of
metal
cans
and
ends
(
including
decorative
tins)
and
metal
crowns
and
closures.
It
includes
the
subcategories
listed
in
paragraphs
(
a)(
1)
through
(
4)
of
this
section.
Surface
coating
is
the
application
of
coatings
to
a
substrate
using,
for
example,
spray
guns
or
dip
tanks.
(
1)
One
and
two­
piece
draw
and
iron
can
body
coating.
The
one
and
twopiece
draw
and
iron
can
body
coating
subcategory
includes
all
coating
processes
involved
in
the
manufacture
of
can
bodies
by
the
draw
and
iron
process.
This
subcategory
includes
three
distinct
coating
type
segments
reflecting
the
coatings
appropriate
for
cans
with
different
end
uses.
Those
are
two­
piece
beverage
can
body
coatings,
two­
piece
food
can
body
coatings,
and
one­
piece
aerosol
can
body
coatings.
(
2)
Sheetcoating.
The
sheetcoating
subcategory
includes
all
of
the
flat
metal
sheet
coating
operations
associated
with
the
manufacture
of
three­
piece
cans,
decorative
tins,
crowns,
and
closures.
(
3)
Three­
piece
can
body
assembly
coating.
The
three­
piece
can
body
assembly
coating
subcategory
includes
all
of
the
coating
processes
involved
in
the
assembly
of
three­
piece
metal
can
bodies.
The
subcategory
includes
five
distinct
coating
type
segments
reflecting
the
coatings
appropriate
for
cans
with
different
end
uses.
Those
are
inside
spray
on
food
cans,
aseptic
side
seam
stripes
on
food
cans,
non­
aseptic
side
seam
stripes
on
food
cans,
side
seam
stripes
on
general
line
non­
food
cans,
and
side
seam
stripes
on
aerosol
nonfood
cans.
(
4)
End
lining.
The
end
lining
subcategory
includes
the
application
of
end
seal
compounds
to
metal
can
ends.
That
subcategory
includes
two
distinct
coating
type
segments
reflecting
the
end
seal
compounds
appropriate
for
can
ends
with
different
end
uses.
Those
are
aseptic
end
seal
compounds
and
nonaseptic
end
seal
compounds.
(
b)
You
are
subject
to
this
subpart
if
you
own
or
operate
a
new,
reconstructed,
or
existing
affected
source,
as
defined
in
§
63.3482,
that
uses
5,700
liters
(
1,500
gallons
(
gal))
per
year
or
more
of
coatings
in
the
surface
coating
of
metal
cans
or
ends
(
including
decorative
tins)
or
metal
crowns
or
closures
and
that
is
a
major
source,
is
located
at
a
major
source,
or
is
part
of
a
major
source
of
emissions
of
hazardous
air
pollutants
(
HAP).
A
major
source
of
HAP
emissions
is
any
stationary
source
or
group
of
stationary
sources
located
within
a
contiguous
area
and
under
common
control
that
emits
or
has
the
potential
to
emit
any
single
HAP
at
a
rate
of
9.07
megagrams
(
Mg)
(
10
tons)
or
more
per
year
or
any
combination
of
HAP
at
a
rate
of
22.68
Mg
(
25
tons)
or
more
per
year.
(
c)
This
subpart
does
not
apply
to
surface
coating
that
meets
the
criteria
of
paragraphs
(
c)(
1)
through
(
5)
of
this
section.
(
1)
Surface
coating
conducted
at
a
source
that
uses
only
coatings,
thinners,
and
cleaning
materials
that
contain
no
organic
HAP,
as
determined
according
to
§
63.3541(
a).
(
2)
Surface
coating
subject
to
any
other
NESHAP
in
this
part
as
of
[
date
of
publication
of
the
final
rule
in
the
Federal
Register].
(
3)
Surface
coating
that
occurs
at
research
or
laboratory
facilities
or
that
is
part
of
janitorial,
building,
and
facility
maintenance
operations.
(
4)
Surface
coating
of
continuous
metal
coil
that
may
subsequently
be
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00023
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2132
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
used
in
manufacturing
cans.
Subpart
SSSS
of
this
part
covers
surface
coating
performed
on
a
continuous
metal
coil
substrate.
(
5)
Surface
coating
of
metal
pails,
buckets,
and
drums.
Subpart
MMMM
of
this
part
covers
surface
coating
of
all
metal
parts
and
products
not
explicitly
covered
by
another
subpart.

§
63.3482
What
parts
of
my
plant
does
this
subpart
cover?

(
a)
This
subpart
applies
to
each
new,
reconstructed,
and
existing
affected
source.
(
b)
The
affected
source
is
the
collection
of
all
of
the
items
listed
in
paragraphs
(
b)(
1)
through
(
4)
of
this
section
that
are
used
for
surface
coating
of
metal
cans
and
ends
(
including
decorative
tins),
or
metal
crowns
or
closures
within
each
subcategory:
(
1)
All
coating
operations
as
defined
in
§
63.3581;
(
2)
All
storage
containers
and
mixing
vessels
in
which
coatings,
thinners,
and
cleaning
materials
are
stored
or
mixed;
(
3)
All
manual
and
automated
equipment
and
containers
used
for
conveying
coatings,
thinners,
and
cleaning
materials;
and
(
4)
All
storage
containers
and
all
manual
and
automated
equipment
and
containers
used
for
conveying
waste
materials
generated
by
a
coating
operation.
(
c)
An
affected
source
is
a
new
affected
source
if
it
meets
the
criteria
in
paragraph
(
c)(
1)
of
this
section
and
the
criteria
in
either
paragraph
(
c)(
2)
or
(
3)
of
this
section.
(
1)
You
commenced
construction
of
the
source
after
January
15,
2003
by
installing
new
coating
equipment.
(
2)
The
new
coating
equipment
is
used
to
perform
metal
can
surface
coating
at
a
facility
where
no
metal
can
surface
coating
was
previously
performed.
(
3)
The
new
coating
equipment
is
used
to
perform
metal
can
surface
coating
in
a
subcategory
at
a
facility
where
no
surface
coating
in
that
subcategory
was
previously
performed.
(
d)
An
affected
source
is
reconstructed
if
you
meet
the
criteria
as
defined
in
§
63.2.
(
e)
An
affected
source
is
existing
if
it
is
not
new
or
reconstructed.

§
63.3483
When
do
I
have
to
comply
with
this
subpart?

The
date
by
which
you
must
comply
with
this
subpart
is
called
the
compliance
date.
The
compliance
date
for
each
type
of
affected
source
is
specified
in
paragraphs
(
a)
through
(
c)
of
this
section.
The
compliance
date
begins
the
initial
compliance
period
during
which
you
conduct
the
initial
compliance
demonstration
described
in
§
§
63.3540,
63.3550,
63.3560,
and
63.3570.
(
a)
For
a
new
or
reconstructed
affected
source,
the
compliance
date
is
the
applicable
date
in
paragraph
(
a)(
1)
or
(
2)
of
this
section.
(
1)
If
the
initial
startup
of
your
new
or
reconstructed
affected
source
is
before
[
date
of
publication
of
final
rule
in
the
Federal
Register],
the
compliance
date
is
[
date
of
publication
of
final
rule
in
the
Federal
Register].
(
2)
If
the
initial
startup
of
your
new
or
reconstructed
affected
source
occurs
after
[
date
of
publication
of
final
rule
in
the
Federal
Register],
the
compliance
date
is
the
date
of
initial
startup
of
your
affected
source.
(
b)
For
an
existing
affected
source,
the
compliance
date
is
[
date
3
years
after
date
of
publication
of
final
rule
in
the
Federal
Register].
(
c)
For
an
area
source
that
increases
its
emissions
or
its
potential
to
emit
such
that
it
becomes
a
major
source
of
HAP
emissions,
the
compliance
date
is
specified
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section.
(
1)
For
any
portion
of
the
source
that
becomes
a
new
or
reconstructed
affected
source
subject
to
this
subpart,
the
compliance
date
is
the
date
of
initial
startup
of
the
affected
source
or
[
date
of
publication
of
final
rule
in
the
Federal
Register],
whichever
is
later.
(
2)
For
any
portion
of
the
source
that
becomes
an
existing
affected
source
subject
to
this
subpart,
the
compliance
date
is
the
date
1
year
after
the
area
source
becomes
a
major
source
or
[
date
3
years
after
date
of
publication
of
final
rule
in
the
Federal
Register],
whichever
is
later.
(
d)
You
must
meet
the
notification
requirements
in
§
63.3510
according
to
the
dates
specified
in
that
section
and
in
subpart
A
of
this
part.
Some
of
the
notifications
must
be
submitted
before
the
compliance
dates
described
in
paragraphs
(
a)
through
(
c)
of
this
section.

Emission
Limitations
§
63.3490
What
emission
limits
must
I
meet?

(
a)
For
a
new
or
reconstructed
affected
source,
you
must
limit
organic
HAP
emissions
to
the
atmosphere
to
no
more
than
the
emission
limit(
s)
in
Table
1
to
this
subpart
that
apply
to
you
during
each
12­
month
compliance
period,
determined
according
to
the
requirements
in
§
§
63.3541,
63.3551,
or
63.3561
or,
if
you
control
emissions
with
an
emissions
control
system
using
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option
as
specified
in
§
63.3491(
d),
you
must
reduce
organic
HAP
emissions
to
the
atmosphere
to
no
more
than
the
limit(
s)
in
Table
3
to
this
subpart
determined
according
to
the
requirements
of
§
63.3571.
If
you
perform
surface
coating
in
more
than
one
subcategory
or
utilize
more
than
one
coating
type
within
a
subcategory,
then
you
must
meet
the
individual
emission
limit(
s)
for
each
subcategory
and
coating
type
included.
(
b)
For
an
existing
affected
source,
you
must
limit
organic
HAP
emissions
to
the
atmosphere
to
no
more
than
the
emission
limit(
s)
in
Table
2
to
this
subpart
that
apply
to
you
during
each
12­
month
compliance
period,
determined
according
to
the
requirements
in
§
§
63.3541,
63.3551,
or
63.3561
or,
if
you
control
emissions
with
an
emissions
control
system
using
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option
as
specified
in
§
63.3491(
d),
you
must
reduce
organic
HAP
emissions
to
the
atmosphere
to
no
more
than
the
limit(
s)
in
Table
3
to
this
subpart
determined
according
to
the
requirements
of
§
63.3571.
If
you
perform
surface
coating
in
more
than
one
subcategory
or
utilize
more
than
one
coating
type
within
a
subcategory,
then
you
must
meet
the
individual
emission
limit(
s)
for
each
subcategory
and
coating
type
included.
(
c)
If
you
perform
surface
coating
in
different
subcategories
as
described
in
§
63.3481(
a)(
1)
through
(
4),
then
the
coating
operations
in
each
subcategory
constitute
a
separate
affected
source
and
you
must
conduct
separate
compliance
demonstrations
for
each
applicable
subcategory
and
coating
type
emission
limit
in
paragraphs
(
a)
and
(
b)
of
this
section
and
reflect
those
separate
determinations
in
notifications,
reports,
and
records
required
by
§
§
63.3510,
63.3520,
and
63.3530,
respectively.

§
63.3491
What
are
my
options
for
meeting
the
emission
limits?
You
must
include
all
coatings
and
thinners
used
in
all
surface
coating
operations
within
a
subcategory
or
coating
type
segment
when
determining
whether
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
is
equal
to
or
less
than
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490.
To
make
that
determination,
you
must
use
at
least
one
of
the
four
compliance
options
listed
in
paragraphs
(
a)
through
(
d)
of
this
section.
You
may
apply
any
of
the
compliance
options
to
an
individual
coating
operation
or
to
multiple
coating
operations
within
a
subcategory
or
coating
type
segment
as
a
group.
You
may
use
different
compliance
options
for
different
coating
operations
or
at
different
times
on
the
same
coating
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00024
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2133
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
operation.
However,
you
may
not
use
different
compliance
options
at
the
same
time
on
the
same
coating
operation.
If
you
switch
between
compliance
options
for
any
coating
operation
or
group
of
coating
operations,
you
must
document
that
switch
as
required
by
§
63.3530(
c)
and
you
must
report
it
in
the
next
semiannual
compliance
report
required
in
§
63.3520.
(
a)
Compliant
material
option.
Demonstrate
that
the
organic
HAP
content
of
each
coating
used
in
the
coating
operation(
s)
is
less
than
or
equal
to
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490
and
that
each
thinner
used
contains
no
organic
HAP.
You
must
meet
all
the
requirements
of
§
§
63.3540,
63.3541,
and
63.3542
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
the
emission
limit
using
this
option.
(
b)
Emission
rate
without
add­
on
controls
option.
Demonstrate
that,
based
on
the
coatings
and
thinners
used
in
the
coating
operation(
s),
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
for
the
coating
operation(
s)
is
less
than
or
equal
to
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490,
calculated
as
a
rolling
12­
month
emission
rate
and
determined
on
a
monthly
basis.
You
must
meet
all
the
requirements
of
§
§
63.3550,
63.3551,
and
63.3552
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
the
emission
limit
using
this
option.
(
c)
Emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option.
Demonstrate
that,
based
on
the
coatings
and
thinners
used
in
the
coating
operation(
s)
and
the
emission
reductions
achieved
by
emission
capture
systems
and
add­
on
controls,
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
for
the
coating
operation(
s)
is
less
than
or
equal
to
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490,
calculated
as
a
rolling
12­
month
emission
rate
and
determined
on
a
monthly
basis.
If
you
use
that
compliance
option,
you
must
also
demonstrate
that
all
emission
capture
systems
and
add­
on
control
devices
for
the
coating
operation(
s)
meet
the
operating
limits
required
in
§
63.3492,
except
for
solvent
recovery
systems
for
which
you
conduct
liquid­
liquid
material
balances
according
to
§
63.3561(
j),
and
that
you
meet
the
work
practice
standards
required
in
§
63.3493.
You
must
meet
all
the
requirements
of
§
§
63.3560
through
63.3568
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
the
emission
limits,
operating
limits,
and
work
practice
standards
using
this
option.
(
d)
Control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option.
Demonstrate
that,
based
on
the
emission
reductions
achieved
by
emission
capture
systems
and
add­
on
controls,
total
HAP
emissions
measured
as
total
hydrocarbon
(
THC)
are
reduced
by
95
percent
or
greater
for
existing
sources
or
97
percent
or
greater
for
new
or
reconstructed
sources
or
that
outlet
THC
emissions
are
less
than
or
equal
to
20
parts
per
million
by
volume,
dry
basis
(
ppmvd).
If
you
use
that
compliance
option,
you
must
have
a
capture
device
that
meets
EPA
Method
204
criteria
for
a
permanent
total
enclosure
(
PTE).
You
must
also
demonstrate
that
all
emission
capture
systems
and
add­
on
control
devices
for
the
coating
operation(
s)
meet
the
operating
limits
required
in
§
63.3492
and
that
you
meet
the
work
practice
standards
required
in
§
63.3493.
You
must
meet
all
the
requirements
of
§
§
63.3570
through
63.3578
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
the
emission
limits,
operating
limits,
and
work
practice
standards
using
that
option.

§
63.3492
What
operating
limits
must
I
meet?

(
a)
For
any
coating
operation(
s)
on
which
you
use
the
compliant
material
option
or
the
emission
rate
without
addon
controls
option,
you
are
not
required
to
meet
any
operating
limits.
(
b)
For
any
controlled
coating
operation(
s)
on
which
you
use
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option
or
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option
except
those
for
which
you
use
a
solvent
recovery
system
and
conduct
a
liquid­
liquid
material
balance
according
to
§
63.3561(
j),
you
must
meet
the
operating
limits
specified
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart.
Those
operating
limits
apply
to
the
emission
capture
and
control
systems
on
the
coating
operation(
s)
for
which
you
use
the
options.
You
must
establish
the
operating
limits
during
the
performance
test
according
to
the
requirements
in
§
63.3567
or
§
63.3577,
and
you
must
meet
the
operating
limits
at
all
times
after
you
establish
them.
(
c)
If
you
use
an
add­
on
control
device
other
than
those
listed
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart
or
wish
to
monitor
an
alternative
parameter
and
comply
with
a
different
operating
limit,
you
must
apply
to
the
Administrator
for
approval
of
alternative
monitoring
under
§
63.8(
f).

§
63.3493
What
work
practice
standards
must
I
meet?

(
a)
For
any
coating
operation(
s)
for
which
you
use
the
compliant
material
option
or
the
emission
rate
without
addon
controls
option,
you
are
not
required
to
meet
any
work
practice
standards.
(
b)
If
you
use
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option
or
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option
to
comply
with
the
emission
limitations,
you
must
develop
and
implement
a
work
practice
plan
to
minimize
organic
HAP
emissions
from
the
storage,
mixing,
and
conveying
of
coatings,
thinners,
and
cleaning
materials
used
in,
and
waste
materials
generated
by,
the
coating
operation(
s)
for
which
you
use
those
options;
or
you
must
meet
an
alternative
standard
as
provided
in
paragraph
(
c)
of
this
section.
The
plan
must
specify
practices
and
procedures
to
ensure
that,
at
a
minimum,
the
elements
specified
in
paragraphs
(
b)(
1)
through
(
5)
of
this
section
are
implemented.
(
1)
All
organic­
HAP­
containing
coatings,
thinners,
cleaning
materials,
and
waste
materials
must
be
stored
in
closed
containers.
(
2)
Spills
of
organic­
HAP­
containing
coatings,
thinners,
cleaning
materials,
and
waste
materials
must
be
minimized.
(
3)
Organic­
HAP­
containing
coatings,
thinners,
cleaning
materials,
and
waste
materials
must
be
conveyed
from
one
location
to
another
in
closed
containers
or
pipes.
(
4)
Mixing
vessels
which
contain
organic­
HAP­
containing
coatings
and
other
materials
must
be
closed
except
when
adding
to,
removing,
or
mixing
the
contents.
(
5)
Emissions
of
organic
HAP
must
be
minimized
during
cleaning
of
storage,
mixing,
and
conveying
equipment.
(
c)
As
provided
in
§
63.6(
g),
we,
the
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA),
may
choose
to
grant
you
permission
to
use
an
alternative
to
the
work
practice
standards
in
this
section.

General
Compliance
Requirements
§
63.3500
What
are
my
general
requirements
for
complying
with
this
subpart?
(
a)
You
must
be
in
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations
in
this
subpart
as
specified
in
paragraphs
(
a)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section.
(
1)
Any
coating
operation(
s)
for
which
you
use
the
compliant
material
option
or
the
emission
rate
without
add­
on
controls
option,
as
specified
in
§
63.3491(
a)
and
(
b),
must
be
in
compliance
with
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490.
(
2)
Any
coating
operation(
s)
for
which
you
use
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option,
as
specified
in
§
63.3491(
c),
or
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option,
as
specified
in
§
63.3491(
d),
must
be
in
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations
as
specified
in
paragraphs
(
a)(
2)(
i)
through
(
iii)
of
this
section.
(
i)
The
coating
operation(
s)
must
be
in
compliance
with
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490
at
all
times.

VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00025
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2134
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
(
ii)
The
coating
operation(
s)
must
be
in
compliance
with
the
operating
limits
for
emission
capture
systems
and
addon
control
devices
required
by
§
63.3492
at
all
times
except
for
those
for
which
you
use
a
solvent
recovery
system
and
conduct
liquid­
liquid
material
balances
according
to
§
63.3561(
j).
(
iii)
The
coating
operation(
s)
must
be
in
compliance
with
the
work
practice
standards
in
§
63.3493
at
all
times.
(
b)
You
must
always
operate
and
maintain
your
affected
source,
including
all
air
pollution
control
and
monitoring
equipment
you
use
for
purposes
of
complying
with
this
subpart,
according
to
the
provisions
in
§
63.6(
e)(
1)(
i).
(
c)
If
your
affected
source
uses
an
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
for
purposes
of
complying
with
this
subpart,
you
must
develop
and
implement
a
written
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan
(
SSMP)
according
to
the
provisions
in
§
63.6(
e)(
3).
The
plan
must
address
startup,
shutdown,
and
corrective
actions
in
the
event
of
a
malfunction
of
the
emission
capture
system
or
the
addon
control
device.
The
plan
must
also
address
any
coating
operation
equipment
that
may
cause
increased
emissions
or
that
would
affect
capture
efficiency
if
the
process
equipment
malfunctions,
such
as
conveyors
that
move
parts
among
enclosures.

§
63.3501
What
parts
of
the
General
Provisions
apply
to
me?
Table
5
to
this
subpart
shows
which
parts
of
the
General
Provisions
in
§
§
63.1
through
63.15
apply
to
you.

Notifications,
Reports,
and
Records
§
63.3510
What
notifications
must
I
submit?
(
a)
General.
You
must
submit
the
notifications
in
§
§
63.7(
b)
and
(
c),
63.8(
f)(
4),
and
63.9(
b)
through
(
e)
and
(
h)
that
apply
to
you
by
the
dates
specified
in
those
sections,
except
as
provided
in
paragraphs
(
b)
and
(
c)
of
this
section.
(
b)
Initial
notification.
You
must
submit
the
Initial
Notification
required
by
§
63.9(
b)
for
a
new
or
reconstructed
affected
source
no
later
than
120
days
after
initial
startup
or
120
days
after
[
date
of
publication
of
final
rule
in
the
Federal
Register],
whichever
is
later.
For
an
existing
affected
source,
you
must
submit
the
Initial
Notification
no
later
than
[
date
1
year
after
date
of
publication
of
final
rule
in
the
Federal
Register].
(
c)
Notification
of
compliance
status.
You
must
submit
the
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
required
by
§
63.9(
h)
no
later
than
30
calendar
days
following
the
end
of
the
initial
compliance
period
described
in
§
§
63.3540,
63.3550,
63.3560,
or
63.3570
that
applies
to
your
affected
source.
The
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
must
contain
the
information
specified
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
1)
through
(
9)
of
this
section
and
in
§
63.9(
h).
(
1)
Company
name
and
address.
(
2)
Statement
by
a
responsible
official
with
that
official's
name,
title,
and
signature
certifying
the
truth,
accuracy,
and
completeness
of
the
content
of
the
report.
(
3)
Date
of
the
report
and
beginning
and
ending
dates
of
the
reporting
period.
The
reporting
period
is
the
initial
compliance
period
described
in
§
§
63.3540,
63.3550,
63.3560,
or
63.3570
that
applies
to
your
affected
source.
(
4)
Identification
of
the
compliance
option
or
options
specified
in
§
63.3491
that
you
used
on
each
coating
operation
in
the
affected
source
during
the
initial
compliance
period.
(
5)
Statement
of
whether
or
not
the
affected
source
achieved
the
emission
limitations
for
the
initial
compliance
period.
(
6)
If
you
had
a
deviation,
include
the
information
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
6)(
i)
and
(
ii)
of
this
section.
(
i)
A
description
of
and
statement
of
the
cause
of
the
deviation.
(
ii)
If
you
failed
to
meet
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490,
include
all
the
calculations
you
used
to
determine
the
kilogram
(
kg)
organic
HAP
emitted
per
liter
of
coating
solids
used.
You
do
not
need
to
submit
information
provided
by
the
materials
suppliers
or
manufacturers
or
test
reports.
(
7)
For
each
of
the
data
items
listed
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
7)(
i)
through
(
iv)
of
this
section
that
is
required
by
the
compliance
option(
s)
you
used
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
the
emission
limit,
include
an
example
of
how
you
determined
the
value,
including
calculations
and
supporting
data.
Supporting
data
can
include
a
copy
of
the
information
provided
by
the
supplier
or
manufacturer
of
the
example
coating
or
material
or
a
summary
of
the
results
of
testing
conducted
according
to
§
63.3541(
a),
(
b),
or
(
c).
You
do
not
need
to
submit
copies
of
any
test
reports.
(
i)
Mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP
for
one
coating
and
for
one
thinner.
(
ii)
Volume
fraction
of
coating
solids
for
one
coating.
(
iii)
Density
for
one
coating
and
one
thinner,
except
that
if
you
use
the
compliant
material
option,
only
the
example
coating
density
is
required.
(
iv)
The
amount
of
waste
materials
and
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
contained
in
the
waste
materials
for
which
you
are
claiming
an
allowance
in
Equation
1
of
§
63.3551.
(
8)
The
calculation
of
kg
organic
HAP
emitted
per
liter
of
coating
solids
used
for
the
compliance
option(
s)
you
used,
as
specified
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
8)(
i)
through
(
iii)
of
this
section.
(
i)
For
the
compliant
material
option,
provide
an
example
calculation
of
the
organic
HAP
content
for
one
coating,
using
Equation
1
of
§
63.3541.
(
ii)
For
the
emission
rate
without
addon
controls
option,
provide
the
calculation
of
the
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions
for
each
month,
the
calculation
of
the
total
volume
of
coating
solids
used
each
month,
and
the
calculation
of
the
12­
month
organic
HAP
emission
rate,
using
Equations
1,
1A
through
1C,
2,
and
3,
respectively,
of
§
63.3551.
(
iii)
For
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option,
provide
the
calculation
of
the
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions
for
the
coatings
and
thinners
used
each
month,
using
Equations
1
and
1A
through
1C
of
§
63.3551;
the
calculation
of
the
total
volume
of
coating
solids
used
each
month,
using
Equation
2
of
§
63.3551;
the
calculation
of
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
emission
reduction
each
month
by
emission
capture
systems
and
add­
on
control
devices,
using
Equations
1
and
1A
through
1D
of
§
63.3561,
and
Equations
2,
3,
and
3A
through
3C
of
§
63.3561,
as
applicable;
the
calculation
of
the
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions
each
month,
using
Equation
4
of
§
63.3561,
as
applicable;
and
the
calculation
of
the
12­
month
organic
HAP
emission
rate,
using
Equation
5
of
§
63.3561.
(
9)
For
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option
or
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option,
you
must
include
the
information
specified
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
9)(
i)
through
(
iv)
of
this
section.
The
requirements
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
9)(
i)
through
(
iii)
of
this
section
do
not
apply
to
solvent
recovery
systems
for
which
you
conduct
liquid­
liquid
material
balances
according
to
§
63.3561(
j).
(
i)
For
each
emission
capture
system,
a
summary
of
the
data
and
copies
of
the
calculations
supporting
the
determination
that
the
emission
capture
system
is
a
PTE
or
a
measurement
of
the
emission
capture
system
efficiency.
Include
a
description
of
the
protocol
followed
for
measuring
capture
efficiency,
summaries
of
any
capture
efficiency
tests
conducted,
and
any
calculations
supporting
the
capture
efficiency
determination.
If
you
use
the
data
quality
objective
(
DQO)
or
lower
confidence
limit
(
LCL)
approach,
you
must
also
include
the
statistical
calculations
to
show
you
meet
the
DQO
or
LCL
criteria
in
appendix
A
to
subpart
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00026
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2135
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
KK
of
this
part.
You
do
not
need
to
submit
complete
test
reports.
(
ii)
A
summary
of
the
results
of
each
add­
on
control
device
performance
test.
You
do
not
need
to
submit
complete
test
reports.
(
iii)
A
list
of
each
emission
capture
system's
and
add­
on
control
device's
operating
limits
and
a
summary
of
the
data
used
to
calculate
those
limits.
(
iv)
A
statement
of
whether
or
not
you
developed
and
implemented
the
work
practice
plan
required
by
§
63.3493.

§
63.3520
What
reports
must
I
submit?
(
a)
Semiannual
compliance
reports.
You
must
submit
semiannual
compliance
reports
for
each
affected
source
according
to
the
requirements
of
paragraphs
(
a)(
1)
through
(
7)
of
this
section.
The
semiannual
compliance
reporting
requirements
may
be
satisfied
by
reports
required
under
other
parts
of
the
Clean
Air
Act
(
CAA),
as
specified
in
paragraph
(
a)(
2)
of
this
section.
(
1)
Dates.
Unless
the
Administrator
has
approved
a
different
schedule
for
submission
of
reports
under
§
63.10(
a),
you
must
prepare
and
submit
each
semiannual
compliance
report
according
to
the
dates
specified
in
paragraphs
(
a)(
1)(
i)
through
(
iv)
of
this
section.
Note
that
the
information
reported
for
each
of
the
months
in
the
reporting
period
will
be
based
on
the
last
12
months
of
data
prior
to
the
date
of
each
monthly
calculation.
(
i)
The
first
semiannual
compliance
report
must
cover
the
first
semiannual
reporting
period
which
begins
the
day
after
the
end
of
the
initial
compliance
period
described
in
§
63.3540,
§
63.3550,
§
63.3560,
or
§
63.3570
that
applies
to
your
affected
source
and
ends
on
June
30
or
December
31,
whichever
occurs
first
following
the
end
of
the
initial
compliance
period.
(
ii)
Each
subsequent
semiannual
compliance
report
must
cover
the
subsequent
semiannual
reporting
period
from
January
1
through
June
30
or
the
semiannual
reporting
period
from
July
1
through
December
31.
(
iii)
Each
semiannual
compliance
report
must
be
postmarked
or
delivered
no
later
than
July
31
or
January
31,
whichever
date
is
the
first
date
following
the
end
of
the
semiannual
reporting
period.
(
iv)
For
each
affected
source
that
is
subject
to
permitting
regulations
pursuant
to
40
CFR
part
70
or
40
CFR
part
71,
and
if
the
permitting
authority
has
established
dates
for
submitting
semiannual
reports
pursuant
to
40
CFR
70.6(
a)(
3)(
iii)(
A)
or
40
CFR
71.6(
a)(
3)(
iii)(
A),
you
may
submit
the
first
and
subsequent
compliance
reports
according
to
the
dates
the
permitting
authority
has
established
instead
of
the
date
specified
in
paragraph
(
a)(
1)(
iii)
of
this
section.
(
2)
Inclusion
with
title
V
report.
Each
affected
source
that
has
obtained
a
title
V
operating
permit
pursuant
to
40
CFR
part
70
or
40
CFR
part
71
must
report
all
deviations
as
defined
in
this
subpart
in
the
semiannual
monitoring
report
required
by
40
CFR
70.6(
a)(
3)(
iii)(
A)
or
40
CFR
71.6(
a)(
3)(
iii)(
A).
If
an
affected
source
submits
a
semiannual
compliance
report
pursuant
to
this
section
along
with,
or
as
part
of,
the
semiannual
monitoring
report
required
by
40
CFR
70.6(
a)(
3)(
iii)(
A)
or
40
CFR
71.6(
a)(
3)(
iii)(
A),
and
the
semiannual
compliance
report
includes
all
required
information
concerning
deviations
from
any
emission
limitation
in
this
subpart,
its
submission
will
be
deemed
to
satisfy
any
obligation
to
report
the
same
deviations
in
the
semiannual
monitoring
report.
However,
submission
of
a
semiannual
compliance
report
shall
not
otherwise
affect
any
obligation
the
affected
source
may
have
to
report
deviations
from
permit
requirements
to
the
permitting
authority.
(
3)
General
requirements.
The
semiannual
compliance
report
must
contain
the
information
specified
in
paragraphs
(
a)(
3)(
i)
through
(
v)
of
this
section
and
the
information
specified
in
paragraphs
(
a)(
4)
through
(
7)
and
(
c)(
1)
of
this
section
that
is
applicable
to
your
affected
source.
(
i)
Company
name
and
address.
(
ii)
Statement
by
a
responsible
official
with
that
official's
name,
title,
and
signature,
certifying
the
truth,
accuracy,
and
completeness
of
the
content
of
the
report.
(
iii)
Date
of
report
and
beginning
and
ending
dates
of
the
reporting
period.
The
reporting
period
is
the
6­
month
period
ending
on
June
30
or
December
31.
Note
that
the
information
reported
for
each
of
the
6
months
in
the
reporting
period
will
be
based
on
the
last
12
months
of
data
prior
to
the
date
of
each
monthly
calculation.
(
iv)
Identification
of
the
compliance
option
or
options
specified
in
§
63.3491
that
you
used
on
each
coating
operation
during
the
reporting
period.
If
you
switched
between
compliance
options
during
the
reporting
period,
you
must
report
the
beginning
and
ending
dates
you
used
each
option.
(
v)
If
you
used
the
emission
rate
without
add­
on
controls
or
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
compliance
option
(
§
63.3491(
b)
or
(
c)),
the
calculation
results
for
each
rolling
12­
month
organic
HAP
emission
rate
during
the
6­
month
reporting
period.
(
4)
No
deviations.
If
there
were
no
deviations
from
the
emission
limitations,
operating
limits,
or
work
practice
standards
in
§
§
63.3490,
63.3492,
and
63.3493
that
apply
to
you,
the
semiannual
compliance
report
must
include
a
statement
that
there
were
no
deviations
from
the
emission
limitations
during
the
reporting
period.
If
you
used
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option
or
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option
and
there
were
no
periods
during
which
the
continuous
parameter
monitoring
systems
(
CPMS)
were
out
of
control
as
specified
in
§
63.8(
c)(
7),
the
semiannual
compliance
report
must
include
a
statement
that
there
were
no
periods
during
which
the
CPMS
were
out
of
control
during
the
reporting
period.
(
5)
Deviations:
compliant
material
option.
If
you
used
the
compliant
material
option
and
there
was
a
deviation
from
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490,
the
semiannual
compliance
report
must
contain
the
information
in
paragraphs
(
a)(
5)(
i)
through
(
iv)
of
this
section.
(
i)
Identification
of
each
coating
used
that
deviated
from
the
emission
limit,
each
thinner
used
that
contained
organic
HAP,
and
the
dates
and
time
periods
each
was
used.
(
ii)
The
calculation
of
the
organic
HAP
content
(
using
Equation
1
of
§
63.3541)
for
each
coating
identified
in
paragraph
(
a)(
5)(
i)
of
this
section.
You
do
not
need
to
submit
background
data
supporting
this
calculation,
for
example,
information
provided
by
coating
suppliers
or
manufacturers,
or
test
reports.
(
iii)
The
determination
of
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP
for
each
coating
and
thinner
identified
in
paragraph
(
a)(
5)(
i)
of
this
section.
You
do
not
need
to
submit
background
data
supporting
this
calculation,
for
example,
information
provided
by
material
suppliers
or
manufacturers,
or
test
reports.
(
iv)
A
statement
of
the
cause
of
each
deviation.
(
6)
Deviations:
emission
rate
without
add­
on
controls
option.
If
you
used
the
emission
rate
without
add­
on
controls
option
and
there
was
a
deviation
from
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490,
the
semiannual
compliance
report
must
contain
the
information
in
paragraphs
(
a)(
6)(
i)
through
(
iii)
of
this
section.
(
i)
The
beginning
and
ending
dates
of
each
compliance
period
during
which
the
12­
month
organic
HAP
emission
rate
exceeded
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490.
(
ii)
The
calculations
used
to
determine
the
12­
month
organic
HAP
emission
rate
for
the
compliance
period
in
which
the
deviation
occurred.
You
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00027
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2136
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
must
provide
the
calculations
for
Equations
1,
1A
through
1C,
2,
and
3
in
§
63.3551;
and
if
applicable,
the
calculation
used
to
determine
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
waste
materials
according
to
§
63.3551(
e)(
4).
You
do
not
need
to
submit
background
data
supporting
these
calculations,
for
example,
information
provided
by
materials
suppliers
or
manufacturers,
or
test
reports.
(
iii)
A
statement
of
the
cause
of
each
deviation.
(
7)
Deviations:
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option.
If
you
used
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option
and
there
was
a
deviation
from
an
emission
limitation
(
including
any
periods
when
emissions
bypassed
the
add­
on
control
device
and
were
diverted
to
the
atmosphere),
the
semiannual
compliance
report
must
contain
the
information
in
paragraphs
(
a)(
7)(
i)
through
(
xiv)
of
this
section.
That
includes
periods
of
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
during
which
deviations
occurred.
(
i)
The
beginning
and
ending
dates
of
each
compliance
period
during
which
the
12­
month
organic
HAP
emission
rate
exceeded
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490.
(
ii)
The
calculations
used
to
determine
the
12­
month
organic
HAP
emission
rate
for
each
compliance
period
in
which
a
deviation
occurred.
You
must
provide
the
calculation
of
the
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions
for
the
coatings
and
thinners
used
each
month,
using
Equations
1
and
1A
through
1C
of
§
63.3551
and,
if
applicable,
the
calculation
used
to
determine
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
waste
materials
according
to
§
63.3551(
e)(
4);
the
calculation
of
the
total
volume
of
coating
solids
used
each
month,
using
Equation
2
of
§
63.3551;
the
calculation
of
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
emission
reduction
each
month
by
emission
capture
systems
and
add­
on
control
devices,
using
Equations
1
and
1A
through
1D
of
§
63.3561,
and
Equations
2,
3,
and
3A
through
3C
of
§
63.3561,
as
applicable;
the
calculation
of
the
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions
each
month,
using
Equation
4
of
§
63.3561;
and
the
calculation
of
the
12­
month
organic
HAP
emission
rate,
using
Equation
5
of
§
63.3561.
You
do
not
need
to
submit
the
background
data
supporting
these
calculations
(
e.
g.,
information
provided
by
materials
suppliers
or
manufacturers,
or
test
reports).
(
iii)
The
date
and
time
that
each
malfunction
started
and
stopped.
(
iv)
A
brief
description
of
the
CPMS.
(
v)
The
date
of
the
latest
CPMS
certification
or
audit.
(
vi)
The
date
and
time
that
each
CPMS
was
inoperative,
except
for
zero
(
low­
level)
and
high­
level
checks.
(
vii)
The
date,
time,
and
duration
that
each
CPMS
was
out
of
control,
including
the
information
in
§
63.8(
c)(
8).
(
viii)
The
date
and
time
period
of
each
deviation
from
an
operating
limit
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart;
date
and
time
period
of
any
bypass
of
the
add­
on
control
device;
and
whether
each
deviation
occurred
during
a
period
of
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
or
during
another
period.
(
ix)
A
summary
of
the
total
duration
of
each
deviation
from
an
operating
limit
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart
and
each
bypass
of
the
add­
on
control
device
during
the
semiannual
reporting
period
and
the
total
duration
as
a
percent
of
the
total
source
operating
time
during
that
semiannual
reporting
period.
(
x)
A
breakdown
of
the
total
duration
of
the
deviations
from
the
operating
limits
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart
and
bypasses
of
the
add­
on
control
device
during
the
semiannual
reporting
period
into
those
that
were
due
to
startup,
shutdown,
control
equipment
problems,
process
problems,
other
known
causes,
and
other
unknown
causes.
(
xi)
A
summary
of
the
total
duration
of
CPMS
downtime
during
the
semiannual
reporting
period
and
the
total
duration
of
CPMS
downtime
as
a
percent
of
the
total
source
operating
time
during
that
semiannual
reporting
period.
(
xii)
A
description
of
any
changes
in
the
CPMS,
coating
operation,
emission
capture
system,
or
add­
on
control
device
since
the
last
semiannual
reporting
period.
(
xiii)
For
each
deviation
from
the
work
practice
standards,
a
description
of
the
deviation;
the
date
and
time
period
of
the
deviation;
and
the
actions
you
took
to
correct
the
deviation.
(
xiv)
A
statement
of
the
cause
of
each
deviation.
(
8)
Deviations:
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option.
If
you
used
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option,
and
there
was
a
deviation
from
an
emission
limitation
(
including
any
periods
when
emissions
bypassed
the
add­
on
control
device
and
were
diverted
to
the
atmosphere),
the
semiannual
compliance
report
must
contain
the
information
in
paragraphs
(
a)(
8)(
i)
through
(
xii)
of
this
section.
This
includes
periods
of
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
during
which
deviations
occurred.
(
i)
The
date
and
time
that
each
malfunction
started
and
stopped.
(
ii)
A
brief
description
of
the
CPMS.
(
iii)
The
date
of
the
latest
certification
or
audit
of
the
CPMS.
(
iv)
The
date
and
time
that
each
CPMS
was
inoperative,
except
for
zero
(
low­
level)
and
high­
level
checks.
(
v)
The
date,
time,
and
duration
that
each
CPMS
was
out­
of­
control,
including
the
information
in
§
63.8(
c)(
8).
(
vi)
The
date
and
time
period
of
each
deviation
from
an
operating
limit
in
Table
4
of
this
subpart;
date
and
time
of
any
bypass
of
the
add­
on
control
device;
and
whether
each
deviation
occurred
during
a
period
of
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
or
during
another
period.
(
vii)
A
summary
of
the
total
duration
of
each
deviation
from
an
operating
limit
in
Table
4
of
this
subpart
and
each
bypass
of
the
add­
on
control
device
during
the
semiannual
reporting
period
and
the
total
duration
as
a
percent
of
the
total
source
operating
time
during
that
semiannual
reporting
period.
(
viii)
A
breakdown
of
the
total
duration
of
the
deviations
from
the
operating
limits
in
Table
4
of
this
subpart
and
bypasses
of
the
add­
on
control
device
during
the
semiannual
reporting
period
into
those
that
were
due
to
startup,
shutdown,
control
equipment
problems,
process
problems,
other
known
causes,
and
other
unknown
causes.
(
ix)
A
summary
of
the
total
duration
of
CPMS
downtime
during
the
semiannual
reporting
period
and
the
total
duration
of
CPMS
downtime
as
a
percent
of
the
total
source
operating
time
during
that
semiannual
reporting
period.
(
x)
A
description
of
any
changes
in
the
CPMS,
coating
operation,
emission
capture
system,
or
add­
on
control
device
since
the
last
semiannual
reporting
period.
(
xi)
For
each
deviation
from
the
work
practice
standards,
a
description
of
the
deviation;
the
date
and
time
period
of
the
deviation;
and
the
actions
you
took
to
correct
the
deviation.
(
xii)
A
statement
of
the
cause
of
each
deviation.
(
b)
Performance
test
reports.
If
you
use
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option
or
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option,
you
must
submit
reports
of
performance
test
results
for
emission
capture
systems
and
add­
on
control
devices
no
later
than
60
days
after
completing
the
tests
as
specified
in
§
63.10(
d)(
2).
(
c)
Startup,
shutdown,
malfunction
reports.
If
you
used
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option
or
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option
and
you
had
a
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
during
the
semiannual
reporting
period,
you
must
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00028
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2137
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
submit
the
reports
specified
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section.
(
1)
If
your
actions
were
consistent
with
your
SSMP,
you
must
include
the
information
specified
in
§
63.10(
d)
in
the
semiannual
compliance
report
required
by
paragraph
(
a)
of
this
section.
(
2)
If
your
actions
were
not
consistent
with
your
SSMP,
you
must
submit
an
immediate
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
report
as
described
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
2)(
i)
and
(
ii)
of
this
section.
(
i)
You
must
describe
the
actions
taken
during
the
event
in
a
report
delivered
by
facsimile,
telephone,
or
other
means
to
the
Administrator
within
2
working
days
after
starting
actions
that
are
inconsistent
with
the
plan.
(
ii)
You
must
submit
a
letter
to
the
Administrator
within
7
working
days
after
the
end
of
the
event,
unless
you
have
made
alternative
arrangements
with
the
Administrator
as
specified
in
§
63.10(
d)(
5)(
ii).
The
letter
must
contain
the
information
specified
in
§
63.10(
d)(
5)(
ii).

§
63.3530
What
records
must
I
keep?

You
must
collect
and
keep
records
of
the
data
and
information
specified
in
this
section.
Failure
to
collect
and
keep
the
records
is
a
deviation
from
the
applicable
standard.
(
a)
A
copy
of
each
notification
and
report
that
you
submitted
to
comply
with
this
subpart
and
the
documentation
supporting
each
notification
and
report.
(
b)
A
current
copy
of
information
provided
by
materials
suppliers
or
manufacturers,
such
as
manufacturer's
formulation
data,
or
test
data
used
to
determine
the
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP
and
density
for
each
coating
and
thinner
and
the
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids
for
each
coating.
If
you
conducted
testing
to
determine
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP,
density,
or
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids,
you
must
keep
a
copy
of
the
complete
test
report.
If
you
use
information
provided
to
you
by
the
manufacturer
or
supplier
of
the
material
that
was
based
on
testing,
you
must
keep
the
summary
sheet
of
results
provided
to
you
by
the
manufacturer
or
supplier.
You
are
not
required
to
obtain
the
test
report
or
other
supporting
documentation
from
the
manufacturer
or
supplier.
(
c)
For
each
compliance
period,
the
records
specified
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
1)
through
(
4)
of
this
section.
(
1)
A
record
of
the
coating
operations
at
which
you
used
each
compliance
option
and
the
time
periods
(
beginning
and
ending
dates
and
times)
you
used
each
option.
(
2)
For
the
compliant
material
option,
a
record
of
the
calculation
of
the
organic
HAP
content
for
each
coating,
using
Equation
1
of
§
63.3541.
(
3)
For
the
emission
rate
without
addon
controls
option,
a
record
of
the
calculation
of
the
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions
for
the
coatings
and
thinners
used
each
month,
using
Equations
1,
1A
through
1C,
and
2
of
§
63.3551
and,
if
applicable,
the
calculation
used
to
determine
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
waste
materials
according
to
§
63.3551(
e)(
4);
the
calculation
of
the
total
volume
of
coating
solids
used
each
month,
using
Equation
2
of
§
63.3551;
and
the
calculation
of
each
12­
month
organic
HAP
emission
rate,
using
Equation
3
of
§
63.3551.
(
4)
For
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option,
records
of
the
calculations
specified
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
4)(
i)
through
(
v)
of
this
section.
(
i)
The
calculation
of
the
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions
for
the
coatings
and
thinners
used
each
month,
using
Equations
1
and
1A
through
1C
of
§
63.3551
and,
if
applicable,
the
calculation
used
to
determine
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
waste
materials
according
to
§
63.3551(
e)(
4).
(
ii)
The
calculation
of
the
total
volume
of
coating
solids
used
each
month,
using
Equation
2
of
§
63.3551.
(
iii)
The
calculation
of
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
emission
reduction
by
emission
capture
systems
and
add­
on
control
devices,
using
Equations
1
and
1A
through
1D
of
§
63.3561,
and
Equations
2,
3,
and
3A
through
3C
of
§
63.3561,
as
applicable.
(
iv)
The
calculation
of
the
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions
each
month,
using
Equation
4
of
§
63.3561.
(
v)
The
calculation
of
each
12­
month
organic
HAP
emission
rate,
using
Equation
5
of
§
63.3561.
(
5)
For
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option,
records
of
the
measurements
made
by
the
CPMS
used
to
demonstrate
compliance.
For
any
coating
operation(
s)
for
which
you
use
this
option,
you
do
not
have
to
keep
the
records
specified
in
paragraphs
(
d)
through
(
g)
of
this
section.
(
d)
A
record
of
the
name
and
volume
of
each
coating
and
thinner
used
during
each
compliance
period.
(
e)
A
record
of
the
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP
for
each
coating
and
thinner
used
during
each
compliance
period.
(
f)
A
record
of
the
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids
for
each
coating
used
during
each
compliance
period.
(
g)
A
record
of
the
density
for
each
coating
used
during
each
compliance
period;
and,
if
you
use
either
the
emission
rate
without
add­
on
controls
or
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
compliance
option,
the
density
for
each
thinner
used
during
each
compliance
period.
(
h)
If
you
use
an
allowance
in
Equation
1
of
§
63.3551
for
organic
HAP
contained
in
waste
materials
sent
to
or
designated
for
shipment
to
a
treatment,
storage,
and
disposal
facility
(
TSDF)
according
to
§
63.3551(
e)(
4),
you
must
keep
records
of
the
information
specified
in
paragraphs
(
h)(
1)
through
(
3)
of
this
section.
(
1)
The
name
and
address
of
each
TSDF
to
which
you
sent
waste
materials
for
which
you
use
an
allowance
in
Equation
1
of
§
63.3551,
a
statement
of
which
subparts
under
40
CFR
parts
262,
264,
265,
and
266
apply
to
the
facility
and
the
date
of
each
shipment.
(
2)
Identification
of
the
coating
operations
producing
waste
materials
included
in
each
shipment
and
the
month
or
months
in
which
you
used
the
allowance
for
these
materials
in
Equation
1
of
§
63.3551.
(
3)
The
methodology
used
in
accordance
with
§
63.3551(
e)(
4)
to
determine
the
total
amount
of
waste
materials
sent
to
or
the
amount
collected,
stored,
and
designated
for
transport
to
a
TSDF
each
month
and
the
methodology
to
determine
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
contained
in
these
waste
materials.
That
must
include
the
sources
for
all
data
used
in
the
determination,
methods
used
to
generate
the
data,
frequency
of
testing
or
monitoring,
and
supporting
calculations
and
documentation,
including
the
waste
manifest
for
each
shipment.
(
i)
[
Reserved]
(
j)
You
must
keep
records
of
the
date,
time,
and
duration
of
each
deviation.
(
k)
If
you
use
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option
or
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option,
you
must
keep
the
records
specified
in
paragraphs
(
k)(
1)
through
(
8)
of
this
section.
(
1)
For
each
deviation,
a
record
of
whether
the
deviation
occurred
during
a
period
of
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction.
(
2)
The
records
in
§
63.6(
e)(
3)(
iii)
through
(
v)
related
to
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction.
(
3)
The
records
required
to
show
continuous
compliance
with
each
operating
limit
specified
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart
that
applies
to
you.
(
4)
For
each
capture
system
that
is
a
PTE,
the
data
and
documentation
you
used
to
support
a
determination
that
the
capture
system
meets
the
criteria
in
Method
204
of
appendix
M
to
40
CFR
part
51
for
a
PTE
and
has
a
capture
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00029
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2138
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
efficiency
of
100
percent,
as
specified
in
§
63.3565(
a).
(
5)
For
each
capture
system
that
is
not
a
PTE,
the
data
and
documentation
you
used
to
determine
capture
efficiency
according
to
the
requirements
specified
in
§
§
63.3564
and
63.3565(
b)
through
(
e)
including
the
records
specified
in
paragraphs
(
k)(
5)(
i)
through
(
iii)
of
this
section
that
apply
to
you.
(
i)
Records
for
a
liquid­
to­
uncapturedgas
protocol
using
a
temporary
total
enclosure
or
building
enclosure.
Records
of
the
mass
of
total
volatile
hydrocarbon
(
TVH)
as
measured
by
Method
204A
or
F
of
appendix
M
to
40
CFR
part
51
for
each
material
used
in
the
coating
operation
and
the
total
TVH
for
all
materials
used
during
each
capture
efficiency
test
run
including
a
copy
of
the
test
report.
Records
of
the
mass
of
TVH
emissions
not
captured
by
the
capture
system
that
exited
the
temporary
total
enclosure
(
TTE)
or
building
enclosure
during
each
capture
efficiency
test
run,
as
measured
by
Method
204D
or
E
of
appendix
M
to
40
CFR
part
51,
including
a
copy
of
the
test
report.
Records
documenting
that
the
enclosure
used
for
the
capture
efficiency
test
met
the
criteria
in
Method
204
of
appendix
M
to
40
CFR
part
51
for
either
a
TTE
or
a
building
enclosure.
(
ii)
Records
for
a
gas­
to­
gas
protocol
using
a
temporary
total
enclosure
or
a
building
enclosure.
Records
of
the
mass
of
TVH
emissions
captured
by
the
emission
capture
system
as
measured
by
Method
204B
or
C
of
appendix
M
to
40
CFR
part
51
at
the
inlet
to
the
add­
on
control
device
including
a
copy
of
the
test
report.
Records
of
the
mass
of
TVH
emissions
not
captured
by
the
capture
system
that
exited
the
TTE
or
building
enclosure
during
each
capture
efficiency
test
run
as
measured
by
Method
204D
or
E
of
appendix
M
to
40
CFR
part
51
including
a
copy
of
the
test
report.
Records
documenting
that
the
enclosure
used
for
the
capture
efficiency
test
met
the
criteria
in
Method
204
of
appendix
M
to
40
CFR
part
51
for
either
a
TTE
or
a
building
enclosure.
(
iii)
Records
for
an
alternative
protocol.
Records
needed
to
document
a
capture
efficiency
determination
using
an
alternative
method
or
protocol
as
specified
in
§
63.3565(
e)
if
applicable.
(
6)
The
records
specified
in
paragraphs
(
k)(
6)(
i)
and
(
ii)
of
this
section
for
each
add­
on
control
device
organic
HAP
destruction
or
removal
efficiency
determination
as
specified
in
§
63.3566
or
§
63.3576.
(
i)
Records
of
each
add­
on
control
device
performance
test
conducted
according
to
§
63.3564
or
§
63.3574
and
§
63.3566
or
§
63.3576.
(
ii)
Records
of
the
coating
operation
conditions
during
the
add­
on
control
device
performance
test
showing
that
the
performance
test
was
conducted
under
representative
operating
conditions.
(
7)
Records
of
the
data
and
calculations
you
used
to
establish
the
emission
capture
and
add­
on
control
device
operating
limits
as
specified
in
§
63.3567
or
§
63.3577
and
to
document
compliance
with
the
operating
limits
as
specified
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart.
(
8)
A
record
of
the
work
practice
plan
required
by
§
63.3493
and
documentation
that
you
are
implementing
the
plan
on
a
continuous
basis.

§
63.3531
In
what
form
and
for
how
long
must
I
keep
my
records?

(
a)
Your
records
must
be
kept
in
a
form
suitable
and
readily
available
for
expeditious
review,
according
to
§
63.10(
b)(
1).
Where
appropriate,
the
records
may
be
maintained
as
electronic
spreadsheets
or
as
a
database.
(
b)
As
specified
in
§
63.10(
b)(
1),
you
must
keep
each
record
for
5
years
following
the
date
of
each
occurrence,
measurement,
maintenance,
corrective
action,
report,
or
record.
(
c)
You
must
keep
each
record
on
site
for
at
least
2
years
after
the
date
of
each
occurrence,
measurement,
maintenance,
corrective
action,
report,
or
record,
according
to
§
63.10(
b)(
1).
You
may
keep
the
records
off
site
for
the
remaining
3
years.

Compliance
Requirements
for
the
Compliant
Material
Option
§
63.3540
By
what
date
must
I
conduct
the
initial
compliance
demonstration?

You
must
complete
the
initial
compliance
demonstration
for
the
initial
compliance
period
according
to
the
requirements
in
§
63.3541.
The
initial
compliance
period
begins
on
the
applicable
compliance
date
specified
in
§
63.3483
and
ends
on
the
last
day
of
the
12th
month
following
the
compliance
date.
If
the
compliance
date
occurs
on
any
day
other
than
the
first
day
of
a
month,
then
the
initial
compliance
period
extends
through
the
end
of
that
month
plus
the
next
12
months.
The
initial
compliance
demonstration
includes
the
calculations
according
to
§
63.3541
and
supporting
documentation
showing
that,
during
the
initial
compliance
period,
you
used
no
coating
with
an
organic
HAP
content
that
exceeded
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490
and
that
you
used
no
thinners
that
contained
organic
HAP.
§
63.3541
How
do
I
demonstrate
initial
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations?
You
may
use
the
compliant
material
option
for
any
individual
coating
operation,
for
any
group
of
coating
operations
within
a
subcategory
or
coating
type
segment,
or
for
all
the
coating
operations
within
a
subcategory
or
coating
type
segment.
You
must
use
either
the
emission
rate
without
add­
on
controls
option,
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option,
or
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option
for
any
coating
operation
in
the
affected
source
for
which
you
do
not
use
that
option.
To
demonstrate
initial
compliance
using
the
compliant
material
option,
the
coating
operation
or
group
of
coating
operations
must
use
no
coating
with
an
organic
HAP
content
that
exceeds
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490
and
must
use
no
thinner
that
contains
organic
HAP
as
determined
according
to
this
section.
Any
coating
operation
for
which
you
use
the
compliant
material
option
is
not
required
to
meet
the
operating
limits
or
work
practice
standards
required
in
§
§
63.3492
and
63.3493,
respectively.
You
must
conduct
a
separate
initial
compliance
demonstration
for
each
one
and
two­
piece
draw
and
iron
can
body
coating,
sheet
coating,
three­
piece
can
body
assembly
coating,
and
end
lining
affected
source.
You
must
meet
all
the
requirements
of
this
section
for
the
coating
operation
or
group
of
coating
operations
using
this
option.
Use
the
procedures
in
this
section
on
each
coating
and
thinner
in
the
condition
it
is
in
when
it
is
received
from
its
manufacturer
or
supplier
and
prior
to
any
alteration
(
e.
g.,
mixing
or
thinning).
Do
not
include
any
coatings
or
thinners
used
on
coating
operations
for
which
you
use
the
emission
rate
without
addon
controls
option,
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option,
or
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option.
You
do
not
need
to
redetermine
the
HAP
content
of
coatings
or
thinners
that
have
been
reclaimed
onsite
and
reused
in
the
coating
operation(
s)
for
which
you
use
the
compliant
material
option,
provided
these
materials
in
their
condition
as
received
were
demonstrated
to
comply
with
the
compliant
material
option.
(
a)
Determine
the
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP
for
each
material
used.
You
must
determine
the
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP
for
each
coating
and
thinner
used
during
the
compliance
period
by
using
one
of
the
options
in
paragraphs
(
a)(
1)
through
(
5)
of
this
section.
(
1)
Method
311
(
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
63).
You
may
use
Method
311
for
determining
the
mass
fraction
of
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00030
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2139
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
organic
HAP.
Use
the
procedures
specified
in
paragraphs
(
a)(
1)(
i)
and
(
ii)
of
this
section
when
performing
a
Method
311
test.
(
i)
Count
each
organic
HAP
that
is
measured
to
be
present
at
0.1
percent
by
mass
or
more
for
Occupational
Safety
and
Health
Administration
(
OSHA)­
defined
carcinogens
as
specified
in
29
CFR
1910.1200(
d)(
4)
and
at
1.0
percent
by
mass
or
more
for
other
compounds.
For
example,
if
toluene
(
not
an
OSHA
carcinogen)
is
measured
to
be
0.5
percent
of
the
material
by
mass,
you
do
not
have
to
count
it.
Express
the
mass
fraction
of
each
organic
HAP
you
count
as
a
value
truncated
to
four
places
after
the
decimal
point
(
for
example,
0.3791).
(
ii)
Calculate
the
total
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP
in
the
test
material
by
adding
up
the
individual
organic
HAP
mass
fractions
and
truncating
the
result
to
three
places
after
the
decimal
point
(
for
example,
0.763).
(
2)
Method
24
(
Appendix
A
to
40
CFR
Part
60).
For
coatings,
you
may
use
Method
24
to
determine
the
mass
fraction
of
nonaqueous
volatile
matter
and
use
that
value
as
a
substitute
for
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP.
(
3)
Alternative
method.
You
may
use
an
alternative
test
method
for
determining
the
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP
once
the
Administrator
has
approved
it.
You
must
follow
the
procedure
in
§
63.7(
f)
to
submit
an
alternative
test
method
for
approval.
(
4)
Information
from
the
supplier
or
manufacturer
of
the
material.
You
may
rely
on
information
other
than
that
generated
by
the
test
methods
specified
in
paragraphs
(
a)(
1)
through
(
3)
of
this
section,
such
as
manufacturer's
formulation
data,
if
it
represents
each
organic
HAP
that
is
present
at
0.1
percent
by
mass
or
more
for
OSHAdefined
carcinogens
as
specified
in
29
CFR
1910.1200(
d)(
4)
and
at
1.0
percent
by
mass
or
more
for
other
compounds.
For
example,
if
toluene
(
not
an
OSHA
carcinogen)
is
0.5
percent
of
the
material
by
mass,
you
do
not
have
to
count
it.
If
there
is
a
disagreement
between
such
information
and
results
of
a
test
conducted
according
to
paragraphs
(
a)(
1)
through
(
3)
of
this
section,
then
the
test
method
results
will
take
precedence.
(
5)
Solvent
blends.
Solvent
blends
may
be
listed
as
single
components
for
some
materials
in
data
provided
by
manufacturers
or
suppliers.
Solvent
blends
may
contain
organic
HAP
which
must
be
counted
toward
the
total
organic
HAP
mass
fraction
of
the
materials.
When
test
data
and
manufacturer's
data
for
solvent
blends
are
not
available,
you
may
use
the
default
values
for
the
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP
in
those
solvent
blends
listed
in
Table
6
or
7
to
this
subpart.
If
you
use
the
tables,
you
must
use
the
values
in
Table
6
to
this
subpart
for
all
solvent
blends
that
match
Table
6
entries,
and
you
may
only
use
Table
7
to
this
subpart
if
the
solvent
blends
in
the
materials
you
use
do
not
match
any
of
the
solvent
blends
in
Table
6
and
you
only
know
whether
the
blend
is
aliphatic
or
aromatic.
However,
if
the
results
of
a
Method
311
(
40
CFR
part
63,
appendix
A)
test
indicate
higher
values
than
those
listed
on
Table
6
or
7
to
this
subpart,
the
Method
311
(
40
CFR
part
63,
appendix
A)
results
will
take
precedence.
(
b)
Determine
the
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids
for
each
coating.
You
must
determine
the
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids
(
liters
of
coating
solids
per
liter
of
coating)
for
each
coating
used
during
the
compliance
period
by
a
test
or
by
information
provided
by
the
supplier
or
the
manufacturer
of
the
material
as
specified
in
paragraphs
(
b)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section.
If
test
results
obtained
according
to
paragraph
(
b)(
1)
of
this
section
do
not
agree
with
the
information
obtained
under
paragraph
(
b)(
2)
of
this
section,
the
test
results
will
take
precedence.
(
1)
ASTM
Method
D2697
 
86
(
Reapproved
1998)
or
D6093
 
97.
You
may
use
ASTM
Method
D2697
 
86
(
Reapproved
1998)
or
D6093
 
97
to
determine
the
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids
for
each
coating.
Divide
the
nonvolatile
volume
percent
obtained
with
the
methods
by
100
to
calculate
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids.
(
2)
Information
from
the
supplier
or
manufacturer
of
the
material.
You
may
obtain
the
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids
for
each
coating
from
the
supplier
or
manufacturer.
(
c)
Determine
the
density
of
each
coating.
Determine
the
density
of
each
coating
used
during
the
compliance
period
from
test
results
using
ASTM
Method
D1475
 
98
or
information
from
the
supplier
or
manufacturer
of
the
material.
If
there
is
disagreement
between
ASTM
Method
D1475
 
98
test
results
and
the
supplier's
or
manufacturer's
information,
the
test
results
will
take
precedence.
(
d)
Calculate
the
organic
HAP
content
of
each
coating.
Calculate
the
organic
HAP
content,
kg
organic
HAP
per
liter
coating
solids,
of
each
coating
used
during
the
compliance
period,
using
Equation
1
of
this
section.

H
D
W
V
Eq
c
c
c
s
=(
)(
)
(
.
1)

Where:
Hc
=
organic
HAP
content
of
the
coating,
kg
organic
HAP
per
liter
coating
solids.
Dc
=
density
of
coating,
kg
coating
per
liter
coating,
determined
according
to
paragraph
(
c)
of
this
section.
Wc
=
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP
in
the
coating,
kg
organic
HAP
per
kg
coating,
determined
according
to
paragraph
(
a)
of
this
section.
Vs
=
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids,
liter
coating
solids
per
liter
coating,
determined
according
to
paragraph
(
b)
of
this
section.
(
e)
Compliance
demonstration.
The
organic
HAP
content
for
each
coating
used
during
the
initial
compliance
period,
determined
using
Equation
1
of
this
section,
must
be
less
than
or
equal
to
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490
and
each
thinner
used
during
the
initial
compliance
period
must
contain
no
organic
HAP,
determined
according
to
paragraph
(
a)
of
this
section.
You
must
keep
all
records
required
by
§
§
63.3530
and
63.3531.
As
part
of
the
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
required
in
§
63.3510,
you
must
identify
the
coating
operation(
s)
for
which
you
used
the
compliant
material
option
and
submit
a
statement
that
the
coating
operation(
s)
was
(
were)
in
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations
during
the
initial
compliance
period
because
you
used
no
coatings
for
which
the
organic
HAP
content
exceeded
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490
and
you
used
no
thinners
that
contained
organic
HAP,
determined
according
to
paragraph
(
a)
of
this
section.

§
63.3542
How
do
I
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations?

(
a)
For
each
compliance
period,
to
demonstrate
continuous
compliance,
you
must
use
no
coating
for
which
the
organic
HAP
content,
determined
using
Equation
1
of
§
63.3541,
exceeds
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490
and
use
no
thinner
that
contains
organic
HAP,
determined
according
to
§
63.3541(
a).
A
compliance
period
consists
of
12
months.
Each
month
after
the
end
of
the
initial
compliance
period
described
in
§
63.3540
is
the
end
of
a
compliance
period
consisting
of
that
month
and
the
preceding
11
months.
(
b)
If
you
choose
to
comply
with
the
emission
limitations
by
using
the
compliant
material
option,
the
use
of
any
coating
or
thinner
that
does
not
meet
the
criteria
specified
in
paragraph
(
a)
of
this
section
is
a
deviation
from
the
emission
limitations
that
must
be
reported
as
specified
in
§
§
63.3510(
b)(
6)
and
63.3520(
a)(
5).

VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00031
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
EP15JA03.000</
GPH>
2140
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
(
c)
As
part
of
each
semiannual
compliance
report
required
by
§
63.3520,
you
must
identify
the
coating
operation(
s)
for
which
you
used
the
compliant
material
option.
If
there
were
no
deviations
from
the
emission
limitations
in
§
63.3490,
submit
a
statement
that
the
coating
operation(
s)
was
(
were)
in
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations
during
the
reporting
period
because
you
used
no
coating
for
which
the
organic
HAP
content
exceeded
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490
and
you
used
no
thinner
or
cleaning
material
that
contained
organic
HAP,
determined
according
to
§
63.3541(
a).
(
d)
You
must
maintain
records
as
specified
in
§
§
63.3530
and
63.3531.

Compliance
Requirements
for
the
Emission
Rate
Without
Add­
On
Controls
Option
§
63.3550
By
what
date
must
I
conduct
the
initial
compliance
demonstration?
You
must
complete
the
initial
compliance
demonstration
for
the
initial
compliance
period
according
to
the
requirements
of
§
63.3551.
The
initial
compliance
period
begins
on
the
applicable
compliance
date
specified
in
§
63.3483
and
ends
on
the
last
day
of
the
12th
month
following
the
compliance
date.
If
the
compliance
date
occurs
on
any
day
other
than
the
first
day
of
a
month,
then
the
initial
compliance
period
extends
through
the
end
of
that
month
plus
the
next
12
months.
You
must
determine
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions
and
volume
of
coating
solids
used
each
month
and
then
calculate
a
12­
month
organic
HAP
emission
rate
at
the
end
of
the
initial
12­
month
compliance
period.
The
initial
compliance
demonstration
includes
the
calculations
according
to
§
63.3551
and
supporting
documentation
showing
that,
during
the
initial
compliance
period,
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
was
equal
to
or
less
than
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490.

§
63.3551
How
do
I
demonstrate
initial
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations?
You
may
use
the
emission
rate
without
add­
on
controls
option
for
any
coating
operation,
for
any
group
of
coating
operations
within
a
subcategory
or
coating
type
segment,
or
for
all
of
the
coating
operations
within
a
subcategory
or
coating
type
segment.
You
must
use
either
the
compliant
material
option,
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option,
or
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option
for
any
coating
operation
in
the
affected
source
for
which
you
do
not
use
this
option.
If
you
use
the
alternative
overall
emission
limit
for
a
subcategory
according
to
paragraph
(
i)
of
this
section
to
demonstrate
compliance,
however,
you
must
include
all
coating
operations
in
all
coating
type
segments
in
the
subcategory
to
determine
compliance
with
the
overall
limit.
To
demonstrate
initial
compliance
using
the
emission
rate
without
add­
on
controls
option,
the
coating
operation
or
group
of
coating
operations
must
meet
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490,
but
is
not
required
to
meet
the
operating
limits
or
work
practice
standards
in
§
§
63.3492
and
63.3493,
respectively.
You
must
conduct
a
separate
initial
compliance
demonstration
for
each
one
and
twopiece
draw
and
iron
can
body
coating,
sheet
coating,
three­
piece
can
body
assembly
coating,
and
end
lining
affected
source.
You
must
meet
all
the
requirements
of
this
section
to
demonstrate
initial
compliance
with
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490
for
the
coating
operation(
s).
When
calculating
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
according
to
this
section,
do
not
include
any
coatings
or
thinners
used
on
coating
operations
for
which
you
use
the
compliant
material
option,
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option,
or
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option
or
coating
operations
in
a
different
affected
source
in
a
different
subcategory.
Use
the
procedures
in
this
section
on
each
coating
and
thinner
in
the
condition
it
is
in
when
it
is
received
from
its
manufacturer
or
supplier
and
prior
to
any
alteration
(
e.
g.,
mixing
or
thinning).
You
do
not
need
to
redetermine
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
coatings
or
thinners
that
have
been
reclaimed
onsite
and
reused
in
the
coating
operation(
s)
for
which
you
use
the
emission
rate
without
add­
on
controls
option.
(
a)
Determine
the
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP
for
each
material.
Determine
the
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP
for
each
coating
and
thinner
used
during
each
month
according
to
the
requirements
in
§
63.3541(
a).
(
b)
Determine
the
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids
for
each
coating.
Determine
the
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids
for
each
coating
used
during
each
month
according
to
the
requirements
in
§
63.3541(
b).
(
c)
Determine
the
density
of
each
material.
Determine
the
density
of
each
coating
and
thinner
used
during
each
month
from
test
results
using
ASTM
Method
D1475
 
98,
information
from
the
supplier
or
manufacturer
of
the
material,
or
reference
sources
providing
density
or
specific
gravity
data
for
pure
materials.
If
there
is
disagreement
between
ASTM
Method
D1475
 
98
test
results
and
such
other
information
sources,
the
test
results
will
take
precedence.
(
d)
Determine
the
volume
of
each
material
used.
Determine
the
volume
(
liters)
of
each
coating
and
thinner
used
during
each
month
by
measurement
or
usage
records.
(
e)
Calculate
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions.
The
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions
is
the
combined
mass
of
organic
HAP
contained
in
all
coatings
and
thinners
used
during
each
month
minus
the
organic
HAP
in
certain
waste
materials.
Calculate
it
using
Equation
1
of
this
section.

H
A
B
R
Eq
e
w
=
+
 
(
.
1)

Where:
He
=
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions
during
the
month,
kg.
A
=
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
the
coatings
used
during
the
month,
kg,
as
calculated
in
Equation
1A
of
this
section.
B
=
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
the
thinners
used
during
the
month,
kg,
as
calculated
in
Equation
1B
of
this
section.
Rw
=
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
waste
materials
sent
or
designated
for
shipment
to
a
hazardous
waste
TSDF
for
treatment
or
disposal
during
the
month,
kg,
determined
according
to
paragraph
(
e)(
4)
of
this
section.
(
You
may
assign
a
value
of
zero
to
Rw
if
you
do
not
wish
to
use
this
allowance.)
(
1)
Calculate
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
the
coatings
used
during
the
month,
using
Equation
1A
of
this
section.

A
Vol
D
W
Eq
c
i
i
m
c
i
c
i
=
(
)(
)(
)

=
 
,
,
,
(
.

1
1A)

Where:
A
=
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
the
coatings
used
during
the
month,
kg.
Volc,
i
=
total
volume
of
coating,
i,
used
during
the
month,
liters.
Dc,
i
=
density
of
coating,
i,
kg
coating
per
liter
coating.
Wc,
i
=
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP
in
coating,
i,
kg
organic
HAP
per
kg
coating.
m
=
number
of
different
coatings
used
during
the
month.
(
2)
Calculate
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
the
thinners
used
during
the
month
using
Equation
1B
of
this
section.

B
Vol
D
W
Eq
t
j
j
n
t
j
t
j
=
(
)(
)(
)

=
 
,
,
,
(
.

1
1B)

Where:
B
=
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
the
thinners
used
during
the
month,
kg.
Volt,
j
=
total
volume
of
thinner,
j,
used
during
the
month,
liters.

VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00032
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
EP15JA03.001</
GPH>
EP15JA03.002</
GPH>
EP15JA03.003</
GPH>
2141
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
Dt,
j
=
density
of
thinner,
j,
kg
per
liter.
Wt,
j
=
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP
in
thinner,
j,
kg
organic
HAP
per
kg
thinner.
n
=
number
of
different
thinners
used
during
the
month.
(
3)
If
you
choose
to
account
for
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
contained
in
waste
materials
sent
or
designated
for
shipment
to
a
hazardous
waste
TSDF
in
Equation
1
of
this
section,
then
you
must
determine
it
according
to
paragraphs
(
e)(
3)(
i)
through
(
iv)
of
this
section.
(
i)
You
may
include
in
the
determination
only
waste
materials
that
are
generated
by
coating
operations
for
which
you
use
Equation
1
of
this
section
and
that
will
be
treated
or
disposed
of
by
a
facility
regulated
as
a
TSDF
under
40
CFR
part
262,
264,
265,
or
266.
The
TSDF
may
be
either
off­
site
or
on­
site.
You
may
not
include
organic
HAP
contained
in
wastewater.
(
ii)
You
must
determine
either
the
amount
of
the
waste
materials
sent
to
a
TSDF
during
the
month
or
the
amount
collected
and
stored
during
the
month
and
designated
for
future
transport
to
a
TSDF.
Do
not
include
in
your
determination
any
waste
materials
sent
to
a
TSDF
during
a
month
if
you
have
already
included
them
in
the
amount
collected
and
stored
during
that
month
or
a
previous
month.
(
iii)
Determine
the
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
contained
in
the
waste
materials
specified
in
paragraph
(
e)(
4)(
ii)
of
this
section.
(
iv)
You
must
document
the
methodology
you
used
to
determine
the
amount
of
waste
materials
and
the
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
they
contain
as
required
in
§
63.3530(
h).
To
the
extent
that
waste
manifests
include
this
information,
they
may
be
used
as
part
of
the
documentation
of
the
amount
of
waste
materials
and
mass
of
organic
HAP
contained
in
them.
(
f)
Calculate
the
total
volume
of
coating
solids
used.
Determine
the
total
volume
of
coating
solids
used
which
is
the
combined
volume
of
coating
solids
for
all
the
coatings
used
during
each
month,
using
Equation
2
of
this
section.

V
Vol
V
Eq
st
c
i
i
m
s
i
=
(
)(
)

=
 
,
,
(
.

1
2)

Where:
Vst
=
total
volume
of
coating
solids
used
during
the
month,
liters.
Volc,
i
=
total
volume
of
coating,
i,
used
during
the
month,
liters.
Vs,
i
=
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids
for
coating,
i,
liter
solids
per
liter
coating,
determined
according
to
§
63.3541(
b).
m
=
number
of
coatings
used
during
the
month.
(
g)
Calculate
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate.
Calculate
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
for
the
12­
month
compliance
period,
kg
organic
HAP
per
liter
coating
solids
used,
using
Equation
3
of
this
section.

H
H
V
Eq
yr
e
y
st
y
=
=

=
 

 
1
12
1
12
(
.
3)

Where:
Hyr
=
organic
HAP
emission
rate
for
the
12­
month
compliance
period,
kg
organic
HAP
per
liter
coating
solids.
He
=
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions,
kg,
from
all
materials
used
during
month,
y,
as
calculated
by
Equation
1
of
this
section.
Vst
=
total
volume
of
coating
solids,
liters,
used
during
month,
y,
as
calculated
by
Equation
2
of
this
section.
y
=
identifier
for
months.
(
h)
Compliance
demonstration.
The
organic
HAP
emission
rate
for
the
initial
12­
month
compliance
period,
Hyr,
must
be
less
than
or
equal
to
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490.
You
must
keep
all
records
as
required
by
§
§
63.3530
and
63.3531.
As
part
of
the
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
required
by
§
63.3510,
you
must
identify
the
coating
operation(
s)
for
which
you
used
the
emission
rate
without
add­
on
controls
option
and
submit
a
statement
that
the
coating
operation(
s)
was
(
were)
in
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations
during
the
initial
compliance
period
because
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
was
less
than
or
equal
to
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490,
determined
according
to
this
section.
(
i)
Alternative
calculation
of
overall
subcategory
emission
limit
(
OSEL).
Alternatively,
if
your
affected
source
applies
coatings
in
more
than
one
coating
type
segment
within
a
subcategory,
you
may
calculate
an
overall
HAP
emission
limit
for
the
subcategory
using
Equation
4
of
this
section.
If
you
use
this
approach,
you
must
limit
organic
HAP
emissions
to
the
atmosphere
to
the
OSEL
specified
by
Equation
4
of
this
section
during
each
12­
month
compliance
period.

OSEL
L
V
V
Eq
i
i
i
n
i
i
n
=
=

=
 

 
(
)

(
.
1
1
4)
Where:
OSEL
=
total
allowable
organic
HAP
in
kg
HAP/
liter
coating
solids
(
pound
(
lb)
HAP/
gal
solids)
that
can
be
emitted
to
the
atmosphere
from
all
coating
type
segments
in
the
subcategory.
Li
=
HAP
emission
limit
for
coating
type
segment
i
from
Table
1
for
a
new
or
reconstructed
source
or
Table
2
for
an
existing
source,
kg
HAP/
liter
coating
solids
(
lb
HAP/
gal
solids).
Vi
=
total
volume
of
coating
solids
in
liters
(
gal)
for
all
coatings
in
coating
type
segment
i
used
during
the
12­
month
compliance
period.
n
=
number
of
coating
type
segments
within
one
subcategory
being
used
at
the
affected
source.
You
must
use
the
OSEL
determined
by
Equation
4
throughout
the
12­
month
compliance
period
and
may
not
switch
between
compliance
with
individual
coating
type
limits
and
an
OSEL.
You
may
not
include
coatings
in
different
subcategories
in
determining
your
OSEL
by
this
approach.
You
must
keep
all
records
as
required
by
§
§
63.3530
and
63.3531.
As
part
of
the
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
required
by
§
63.3510,
you
must
identify
the
subcategory
for
which
you
used
a
calculated
OSEL
and
submit
a
statement
that
the
coating
operation(
s)
was
(
were)
in
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations
during
the
initial
compliance
period
because
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
for
the
subcategory
was
less
than
or
equal
to
the
OSEL
determined
according
to
this
section.

§
63.3552
How
do
I
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations?

(
a)
To
demonstrate
continuous
compliance,
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
for
each
compliance
period,
determined
according
to
§
63.3551(
a)
through
(
g),
must
be
less
than
or
equal
to
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490.
Alternatively,
if
you
calculate
an
OSEL
for
all
coating
type
segments
within
a
subcategory
according
to
§
63.3551(
i),
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
for
the
subcategory
for
each
compliance
period
must
be
less
than
or
equal
to
the
calculated
OSEL.
You
must
use
the
calculated
OSEL
throughout
each
compliance
period.
A
compliance
period
consists
of
12
months.
Each
month
after
the
end
of
the
initial
compliance
period
described
in
§
63.3550
is
the
end
of
a
compliance
period
consisting
of
that
month
and
the
preceding
11
months.
You
must
perform
the
calculations
in
§
63.4551(
a)
through
(
g)
on
a
monthly
basis
using
data
from
the
previous
12
months
of
operation.

VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00033
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
EP15JA03.004</
GPH>
EP15JA03.005</
MATH>
EP15JA03.006</
MATH>
2142
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
(
b)
If
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
for
any
12­
month
compliance
period
exceeded
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490
or
the
OSEL
calculated
according
to
§
63.3551(
i),
this
is
a
deviation
from
the
emission
limitations
for
that
compliance
period
and
must
be
reported
as
specified
in
§
§
63.3510(
c)(
6)
and
63.3520(
a)(
6).
(
c)
As
part
of
each
semiannual
compliance
report
required
by
§
63.3520,
you
must
identify
the
coating
operation(
s)
for
which
you
used
the
emission
rate
without
add­
on
controls
option.
If
there
were
no
deviations
from
the
emission
limitations,
you
must
submit
a
statement
that
the
coating
operation(
s)
was
(
were)
in
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations
during
the
reporting
period
because
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
for
each
compliance
period
was
less
than
or
equal
to
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490
determined
according
to
§
63.3551(
a)
through
(
g),
or
using
the
OSEL
calculated
according
to
§
63.3551(
i).
(
d)
You
must
maintain
records
as
specified
in
§
§
63.3530
and
63.3531.

Compliance
Requirements
for
the
Emission
Rate
With
Add­
On
Controls
Option
§
63.3560
By
what
date
must
I
conduct
performance
tests
and
other
initial
compliance
demonstrations?
(
a)
New
and
reconstructed
affected
sources.
For
a
new
or
reconstructed
affected
source,
you
must
meet
the
requirements
of
paragraphs
(
a)(
1)
through
(
4)
of
this
section.
(
1)
All
emission
capture
systems,
addon
control
devices,
and
CPMS
must
be
installed
and
operating
no
later
than
the
applicable
compliance
date
specified
in
§
63.3483.
Except
for
solvent
recovery
systems
for
which
you
conduct
liquidliquid
material
balances
according
to
§
63.3561(
j),
you
must
conduct
a
performance
test
of
each
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
according
to
§
§
63.3564,
63.3565,
and
63.3566
and
establish
the
operating
limits
required
by
§
63.3492
no
later
than
180
days
after
the
applicable
compliance
date
specified
in
§
63.3483.
For
a
solvent
recovery
system
for
which
you
conduct
liquid­
liquid
material
balances
according
to
§
63.3561(
j),
you
must
initiate
the
first
material
balance
no
later
than
the
applicable
compliance
date
specified
in
§
63.3483.
(
2)
You
must
develop
and
begin
implementing
the
work
practice
plan
required
by
§
63.3493
no
later
than
the
compliance
date
specified
in
§
63.3483.
(
3)
You
must
complete
the
initial
compliance
demonstration
for
the
initial
compliance
period
according
to
the
requirements
of
§
63.3561.
The
initial
compliance
period
begins
on
the
applicable
compliance
date
specified
in
§
63.3483
and
ends
on
the
last
day
of
the
12th
month
following
the
compliance
date.
If
the
compliance
date
occurs
on
any
day
other
than
the
first
day
of
a
month,
then
the
initial
compliance
period
extends
through
the
end
of
that
month
plus
the
next
12
months.
You
must
determine
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions
and
volume
of
coating
solids
used
each
month
and
then
calculate
a
12­
month
organic
HAP
emission
rate
at
the
end
of
the
initial
12­
month
compliance
period.
The
initial
compliance
demonstration
includes
the
results
of
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
performance
tests
conducted
according
to
§
§
63.3564,
63.3565,
and
63.3566,
results
of
liquidliquid
material
balances
conducted
according
to
§
63.3561(
j),
calculations
according
to
§
63.3561
and
supporting
documentation
showing
that,
during
the
initial
compliance
period,
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
was
equal
to
or
less
than
the
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490(
a),
the
operating
limits
established
during
the
performance
tests
and
the
results
of
the
continuous
parameter
monitoring
required
by
§
63.3568,
and
documentation
of
whether
you
developed
and
implemented
the
work
practice
plan
required
by
§
63.3493.
(
4)
You
do
not
need
to
comply
with
the
operating
limits
for
the
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
required
by
§
63.3492
until
after
you
have
completed
the
performance
tests
specified
in
paragraph
(
a)(
1)
of
this
section.
Instead,
you
must
maintain
a
log
detailing
the
operation
and
maintenance
of
the
emission
capture
system,
add­
on
control
device,
and
continuous
parameter
monitors
during
the
period
between
the
compliance
date
and
the
performance
test.
You
must
begin
complying
with
the
operating
limits
for
your
affected
source
on
the
date
you
complete
the
performance
tests
specified
in
paragraph
(
a)(
1)
of
this
section.
The
requirements
in
this
paragraph
do
not
apply
to
solvent
recovery
systems
for
which
you
conduct
liquid­
liquid
material
balances
according
to
the
requirements
in
§
63.3561(
j).
(
b)
Existing
affected
sources.
For
an
existing
affected
source,
you
must
meet
the
requirements
of
paragraphs
(
b)(
1)
through
(
3)
of
this
section.
(
1)
All
emission
capture
systems,
addon
control
devices,
and
CPMS
must
be
installed
and
operating
no
later
than
the
applicable
compliance
date
specified
in
§
63.3483.
Except
for
solvent
recovery
systems
for
which
you
conduct
liquidliquid
material
balances
according
to
§
63.3561(
j),
you
must
conduct
a
performance
test
of
each
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
according
to
the
procedures
in
§
§
63.3564,
63.3565,
and
63.3566
and
establish
the
operating
limits
required
by
§
63.3492
no
later
than
the
compliance
date
specified
in
§
63.3483.
For
a
solvent
recovery
system
for
which
you
conduct
liquid­
liquid
material
balances
according
to
§
63.3561(
j),
you
must
initiate
the
first
material
balance
no
later
than
the
compliance
date
specified
in
§
63.3483.
(
2)
You
must
develop
and
begin
implementing
the
work
practice
plan
required
by
§
63.3493
no
later
than
the
compliance
date
specified
in
§
63.3483.
(
3)
You
must
complete
the
initial
compliance
demonstration
for
the
initial
compliance
period
according
to
the
requirements
of
§
63.3561.
The
initial
compliance
period
begins
on
the
applicable
compliance
date
specified
in
§
63.3483
and
ends
on
the
last
day
of
the
12th
month
following
the
compliance
date.
If
the
compliance
date
occurs
on
any
day
other
than
the
first
day
of
a
month,
then
the
initial
compliance
period
extends
through
the
end
of
that
month
plus
the
next
12
months.
You
must
determine
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions
and
volume
of
coating
solids
used
each
month
and
then
calculate
a
12­
month
organic
HAP
emission
rate
at
the
end
of
the
initial
12­
month
compliance
period.
The
initial
compliance
demonstration
includes
the
results
of
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
performance
tests
conducted
according
to
§
§
63.3564,
63.3565,
and
63.3566,
results
of
liquidliquid
material
balances
conducted
according
to
§
63.3561(
j),
calculations
according
to
§
63.3561
and
supporting
documentation
showing
that
during
the
initial
compliance
period
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
was
equal
to
or
less
than
the
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490(
b),
the
operating
limits
established
during
the
performance
tests
and
the
results
of
the
continuous
parameter
monitoring
required
by
§
63.3568,
and
documentation
of
whether
you
developed
and
implemented
the
work
practice
plan
required
by
§
63.3493.

§
63.3561
How
do
I
demonstrate
initial
compliance?
(
a)
You
may
use
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option
for
any
coating
operation,
for
any
group
of
coating
operations
within
a
subcategory
or
coating
type
segment,
or
for
all
of
the
coating
operations
within
a
subcategory
or
coating
type
segment.
You
may
include
both
controlled
and
uncontrolled
coating
operations
in
a
group
for
which
you
use
this
option.
You
must
use
either
the
compliant
material
option,
the
emission
rate
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00034
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2143
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
without
add­
on
controls
option,
or
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option
for
any
coating
operation
in
the
affected
source
for
which
you
do
not
use
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option.
To
demonstrate
initial
compliance,
the
coating
operation(
s)
for
which
you
use
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option
must
meet
the
applicable
emission
limitations
in
§
63.3490.
You
must
conduct
a
separate
initial
compliance
demonstration
for
each
one
and
two­
piece
draw
and
iron
can
body
coating,
sheet
coating,
threepiece
can
body
assembly
coating,
and
end
lining
affected
source.
You
must
meet
all
the
requirements
of
this
section
to
demonstrate
initial
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations.
When
calculating
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
according
to
this
section,
do
not
include
any
coatings
or
thinners
used
on
coating
operations
for
which
you
use
the
compliant
material
option,
the
emission
rate
without
add­
on
controls
option,
or
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option.
You
do
not
need
to
redetermine
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
coatings
or
thinners
that
have
been
reclaimed
on­
site
and
reused
in
the
coating
operation(
s)
for
which
you
use
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option.
(
b)
Compliance
with
operating
limits.
Except
as
provided
in
§
63.3560(
a)(
4)
and
except
for
solvent
recovery
systems
for
which
you
conduct
liquid­
liquid
material
balances
according
to
the
requirements
of
§
63.3561(
j),
you
must
establish
and
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
during
the
initial
compliance
period
with
the
operating
limits
required
by
§
63.3492
using
the
procedures
specified
in
§
§
63.3567
and
63.3568.
(
c)
Compliance
with
work
practice
requirements.
You
must
develop,
implement,
and
document
your
implementation
of
the
work
practice
plan
required
by
§
63.3493
during
the
initial
compliance
period,
as
specified
in
§
63.3530.
(
d)
Compliance
with
emission
limits.
You
must
follow
the
procedures
in
paragraphs
(
e)
through
(
n)
of
this
section
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490.
(
e)
Determine
the
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP,
density,
volume
used,
and
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids.
Follow
the
procedures
specified
in
§
63.3551(
a)
through
(
d)
to
determine
the
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP,
density,
and
volume
of
each
coating
and
thinner
used
during
each
month
and
the
volume
fraction
of
coating
solids
for
each
coating
used
during
each
month.
(
f)
Calculate
the
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions
before
add­
on
controls.
Using
Equation
1
of
§
63.3551,
calculate
the
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions
before
add­
on
controls
from
all
coatings
and
thinners
used
during
each
month
in
the
coating
operation
or
group
of
coating
operations
for
which
you
use
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option.
(
g)
Calculate
the
organic
HAP
emission
reduction
for
each
controlled
coating
operation.
Determine
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions
reduced
for
each
controlled
coating
operation
during
each
month.
The
emission
reduction
determination
quantifies
the
total
organic
HAP
emissions
that
pass
through
the
emission
capture
system
and
are
destroyed
or
removed
by
the
add­
on
control
device.
Use
the
procedures
in
paragraph
(
h)
of
this
section
to
calculate
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
emission
reduction
for
each
controlled
coating
operation
using
an
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
other
than
a
solvent
recovery
system
for
which
you
conduct
liquid­
liquid
material
balances.
For
each
controlled
coating
operation
using
a
solvent
recovery
system
for
which
you
conduct
a
liquid­
liquid
material
balance,
use
the
procedures
in
paragraph
(
j)
of
this
section
to
calculate
the
organic
HAP
emission
reduction.
(
h)
Calculate
the
organic
HAP
emission
reduction
for
each
controlled
coating
operation
not
using
liquid­
liquid
material
balances.
For
each
controlled
coating
operation
using
an
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
other
than
a
solvent
recovery
system
for
which
you
conduct
liquidliquid
material
balances,
calculate
the
organic
HAP
emission
reduction,
using
Equation
1
of
this
section.
The
calculation
applies
the
emission
capture
system
efficiency
and
add­
on
control
device
efficiency
to
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
contained
in
the
coatings
and
thinners
that
are
used
in
the
coating
operation
served
by
the
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
during
each
month.
Equation
1
of
this
section
accounts
for
any
period
of
time
a
deviation
specified
in
§
63.3563(
c)
or
(
d)
occurs
in
the
controlled
coating
operation,
including
a
deviation
during
a
period
of
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
during
which
you
must
assume
zero
efficiency
for
the
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device.

H
A
B
R
CE
DRE
T
T
T
Eq
c
c
c
w
op
dev
op
=
+
 
×
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(
(.
100
100
1)

Where:

HC
=
mass
of
organic
HAP
emission
reduction
for
the
controlled
coating
operation
during
the
month,
kg.
AC
=
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
the
coatings
used
in
the
controlled
coating
operation
during
the
month,
kg,
as
calculated
in
Equation
1A
of
this
section.
BC
=
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
the
thinners
used
in
the
controlled
coating
operation
during
the
month,
kg,
as
calculated
in
Equation
1B
of
this
section.
RW
=
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
waste
materials
sent
or
designated
for
shipment
to
a
hazardous
waste
TSDF
for
treatment
or
disposal
during
the
month,
kg,
determined
according
to
§
63.3551(
e)(
4).
CE
=
capture
efficiency
of
the
emission
capture
system
vented
to
the
add­
on
control
device,
percent.
Use
the
test
methods
and
procedures
specified
in
§
§
63.3564
and
63.3565
to
measure
and
record
capture
efficiency.
DRE
=
organic
HAP
destruction
or
removal
efficiency
of
the
add­
on
control
device,
percent.
Use
the
test
methods
and
procedures
in
§
§
63.3564
and
63.3566
to
measure
and
record
the
organic
HAP
destruction
or
removal
efficiency.
Top
=
total
time
period
of
operation
of
controlled
coating
operation
during
the
month,
hours.
Tdev
=
total
time
period
of
deviations
for
controlled
coating
operation
during
the
month,
hours.
(
1)
Calculate
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
the
coatings
used
in
the
controlled
coating
operation,
kg,
using
Equation
1A
of
this
section.

VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00035
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
EP15JA03.007</
MATH>
2144
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
A
Vol
D
W
Eq
C
ci
ci
ci
i
m
=
(
)(
)(
)

=
 
,
,
,
(
.
1A)

1
Where:
AC
=
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
the
coatings
used
in
the
controlled
coating
operation
during
the
month,
kg.
Volc,
i
=
total
volume
of
coating,
i,
used
during
the
month,
liters.
Dc,
i
=
density
of
coating,
i,
kg
per
liter.
Wc,
i
=
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP
in
coating,
i,
kg
per
kg.
m
=
number
of
different
coatings
used.
(
2)
Calculate
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
the
thinners
used
in
the
controlled
coating
operation,
kg,
using
Equation
1B
of
this
section.

B
Vol
D
W
Eq
C
tj
tj
tj
j
n
=
(
)(
)(
)

=
 
,
,
,
(
.
1B)

1
Where:
BC
=
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
the
thinners
used
in
the
controlled
coating
operation
during
the
month,
kg.
Volt,
j
=
total
volume
of
thinner,
j,
used
during
the
month,
liters.
Dt,
j
=
density
of
thinner,
j,
kg
per
liter
thinner.
Wt,
j
=
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP
in
thinner,
j,
kg
organic
HAP
per
kg
thinner.
n
=
number
of
different
thinners
used.
(
i)
[
Reserved]
(
j)
Calculate
the
organic
HAP
emission
reduction
for
each
controlled
coating
operation
using
liquid­
liquid
material
balances.
For
each
controlled
coating
operation
using
a
solvent
recovery
system
for
which
you
conduct
liquid­
liquid
material
balances,
calculate
the
organic
HAP
emission
reduction
by
applying
the
volatile
organic
matter
collection
and
recovery
efficiency
to
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
contained
in
the
coatings
and
thinners
that
are
used
in
the
coating
operation
controlled
by
the
solvent
recovery
system
during
each
month.
Perform
a
liquid­
liquid
material
balance
for
each
month
as
specified
in
paragraphs
(
j)(
1)
through
(
6)
of
this
section.
Calculate
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
emission
reduction
by
the
solvent
recovery
system
as
specified
in
paragraph
(
j)(
7)
of
this
section.
(
1)
For
each
solvent
recovery
system,
install,
calibrate,
maintain,
and
operate
according
to
the
manufacturer's
specifications,
a
device
that
indicates
the
cumulative
amount
of
volatile
organic
matter
recovered
by
the
solvent
recovery
system
each
month.
The
device
must
be
initially
certified
by
the
manufacturer
to
be
accurate
to
within
±
2.0
percent
of
the
mass
of
volatile
organic
matter
recovered.
(
2)
For
each
solvent
recovery
system,
determine
the
mass
of
volatile
organic
matter
recovered
for
the
month,
kg,
based
on
measurement
with
the
device
required
in
paragraph
(
j)(
1)
of
this
section.
(
3)
Determine
the
mass
fraction
of
volatile
organic
matter
for
each
coating
and
thinner
used
in
the
coating
operation
controlled
by
the
solvent
recovery
system
during
the
month,
kg
volatile
organic
matter
per
kg
coating.
You
may
determine
the
volatile
organic
matter
mass
fraction
using
Method
24
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A,
or
an
EPA
approved
alternative
method,
or
you
may
use
information
provided
by
the
manufacturer
or
supplier
of
the
coating.
In
the
event
of
any
inconsistency
between
information
provided
by
the
manufacturer
or
supplier
and
the
results
of
Method
24
of
40
CFR
part
60,
appendix
A,
or
an
approved
alternative
method,
the
test
method
results
will
govern.
(
4)
Determine
the
density
of
each
coating
and
thinner
used
in
the
coating
operation
controlled
by
the
solvent
recovery
system
during
the
month,
kg
per
liter,
according
to
§
63.3551(
c).
(
5)
Measure
the
volume
of
each
coating,
thinner,
and
cleaning
material
used
in
the
coating
operation
controlled
by
the
solvent
recovery
system
during
the
month,
liters.
(
6)
Each
month,
calculate
the
solvent
recovery
system's
volatile
organic
matter
collection
and
recovery
efficiency,
using
Equation
2
of
this
section.

R
M
Vol
D
WV
Eq
V
VR
i
m
j
j
tj
j
n
=
(
)(
)(
)+
(
)(
)(
)
=
=
 
 
100
1
1
Vol
D
WV
2)

i
i
c,
i
,
(
.

Where:
RV
=
volatile
organic
matter
collection
and
recovery
efficiency
of
the
solvent
recovery
system
during
the
month,
percent.
MVR
=
mass
of
volatile
organic
matter
recovered
by
the
solvent
recovery
system
during
the
month,
kg.
Voli
=
volume
of
coating,
i,
used
in
the
coating
operation
controlled
by
the
solvent
recovery
system
during
the
month,
liters.
Di
=
density
of
coating,
i,
kg
per
liter.
WVc,
i
=
mass
fraction
of
volatile
organic
matter
for
coating,
i,
kg
volatile
organic
matter
per
kg
coating.
Volj
=
volume
of
thinner,
j,
used
in
the
coating
operation
controlled
by
the
solvent
recovery
system
during
the
month,
liters.
Dj
=
density
of
thinner,
j,
kg
per
liter.
WVt,
j
=
mass
fraction
of
volatile
organic
matter
for
thinner,
j,
kg
volatile
organic
matter
per
kg
thinner.
m
=
number
of
different
coatings
used
in
the
coating
operation
controlled
by
the
solvent
recovery
system
during
the
month.
n
=
number
of
different
thinners
used
in
the
coating
operation
controlled
by
the
solvent
recovery
system
during
the
month.

(
7)
Calculate
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
emission
reduction
for
the
coating
operation
controlled
by
the
solvent
recovery
system
during
the
month,
using
Equation
3
of
this
section.

H
A
B
R
Eq
CSR
CSR
CSR
v
=
+
(
)
 
 
 
 
100
(
.
3)

VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00036
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4725
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
EP15JA03.008</
MATH>
EP15JA03.009</
MATH>
EP15JA03.010</
GPH>
EP15JA03.011</
GPH>
2145
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
Where:
HCSR
=
mass
of
organic
HAP
emission
reduction
for
the
coating
operation
controlled
by
the
solvent
recovery
system
using
a
liquid­
liquid
material
balance
during
the
month,
kg.
ACSR
=
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
the
coatings
used
in
the
coating
operation
controlled
by
the
solvent
recovery
system,
kg,
calculated
using
Equation
3A
of
this
section.
BCSR
=
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
the
thinners
used
in
the
coating
operation
controlled
by
the
solvent
recovery
system,
kg,
calculated
using
Equation
3B
of
this
section.
RV
=
volatile
organic
matter
collection
and
recovery
efficiency
of
the
solvent
recovery
system,
percent,
from
Equation
2
of
this
section.
(
i)
Calculate
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
the
coatings
used
in
the
coating
operation
controlled
by
the
solvent
recovery
system,
kg,
using
Equation
3A
of
this
section.

A
Vol
D
W
(
Eq.
3A)
CSR
c,
i
c,
i
c,
i
m
=
(
)(
)(
)

=
 

i
1
Where:

ACSR
=
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
the
coatings
used
in
the
coating
operation
controlled
by
the
solvent
recovery
system
during
the
month,
kg.
Volc,
i
=
total
volume
of
coating,
i,
used
during
the
month
in
the
coating
operation
controlled
by
the
solvent
recovery
system,
liters.
Dc,
i
=
density
of
coating,
i,
kg
per
liter.
Wc,
i
=
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP
in
coating,
i,
kg
per
kg.
m
=
number
of
different
coatings
used.

(
ii)
Calculate
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
the
thinners
used
in
the
coating
operation
controlled
by
the
solvent
recovery
system,
using
Equation
3B
of
this
section.

B
Vol
D
W
(
Eq.
3B)
CSR
t,
j
t,
j
t,
j
n
=
(
)(
)(
)

=
 

j
1
Where:
BCSR
=
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
in
the
thinners
used
in
the
coating
operation
controlled
by
the
solvent
recovery
system
during
the
month,
kg.
Volt,
j
=
total
volume
of
thinner,
j,
used
during
the
month
in
the
coating
operation
controlled
by
the
solvent
recovery
system,
liters.
Dt,
j
=
density
of
thinner,
j,
kg
per
liter.
Wt,
j
=
mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP
in
thinner,
j,
kg
per
kg.
n
=
number
of
different
thinners
used.
(
k)
Calculate
the
total
volume
of
coating
solids
used.
Determine
the
total
volume
of
coating
solids
used
which
is
the
combined
volume
of
coating
solids
for
all
the
coatings
used
during
each
month
in
the
coating
operation
or
group
of
coating
operations
for
which
you
use
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option,
using
Equation
2
of
§
63.3551.
(
l)
Calculate
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions
for
each
month.
Determine
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions
during
each
month,
using
Equation
4
of
this
section.

H
H
H
H
(
Eq.
4)
HAP
e
c,
i
CSR,
j
j=
1
r
i=
1
q
=
 
(
) 
(
)
 
 

Where:
HHAP
=
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions
for
the
month,
kg.
He
=
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
emissions
before
add­
on
controls
from
all
the
coatings
and
thinners
used
during
the
month,
kg,
determined
according
to
paragraph
(
f)
of
this
section.
HC,
i
=
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
emission
reduction
for
controlled
coating
operation,
i,
not
using
a
liquid­
liquid
material
balance,
during
the
month,
kg,
from
Equation
1
of
this
section.
HCSR,
j
=
total
mass
of
organic
HAP
emission
reduction
for
coating
operation,
j,
controlled
by
a
solvent
recovery
system
using
a
liquidliquid
material
balance,
during
the
month,
kg,
from
Equation
3
of
this
section.
q
=
number
of
controlled
coating
operations
not
using
a
liquid­
liquid
material
balance.
r
=
number
of
coating
operations
controlled
by
a
solvent
recovery
system
using
a
liquid­
liquid
material
balance.
(
m)
Calculate
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
for
the
12­
month
compliance
period.
Determine
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
for
the
12­
month
compliance
period,
kg
organic
HAP
per
liter
coating
solids
used,
using
Equation
5
of
this
section.

H
H
V
(
Eq.
5)
annual
HAP,
y
y=
1
st,
y
y=
1
=
 

 
12
12
Where:
Hannual
=
organic
HAP
emission
rate
for
the
12­
month
compliance
period,
kg
organic
HAP
per
liter
coating
solids.
HHAP,
y
=
organic
HAP
emission
rate
for
month,
y,
determined
according
to
Equation
4
of
this
section.
Vst,
y
=
total
volume
of
coating
solids
used
during
month,
y,
liters,
from
Equation
2
of
§
63.3551.
y
=
identifier
for
months.
(
n)
Compliance
demonstration.
To
demonstrate
initial
compliance
with
the
emission
limit,
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate,
calculated
using
Equation
5
of
this
section,
must
be
less
than
or
equal
to
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490.
You
must
keep
all
records
as
required
by
§
§
63.3530
and
63.3531.
As
part
of
the
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
required
by
§
63.3510,
you
must
identify
the
coating
operation(
s)
for
which
you
used
the
emission
rate
with
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00037
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
EP15JA03.012</
GPH>
EP15JA03.013</
GPH>
EP15JA03.014</
GPH>
EP15JA03.015</
GPH>
2146
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
add­
on
controls
option
and
submit
a
statement
that
the
coating
operation(
s)
was
(
were)
in
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations
during
the
initial
compliance
period
because
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
was
less
than
or
equal
to
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490
and
you
achieved
the
operating
limits
required
by
§
63.3492
and
the
work
practice
standards
required
by
§
63.3493.

§
63.3562
[
Reserved]

§
63.3563
How
do
I
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations?
(
a)
To
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
with
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490,
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
for
each
compliance
period,
determined
according
to
the
procedures
in
§
63.3561,
must
be
equal
to
or
less
than
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490.
A
compliance
period
consists
of
12
months.
Each
month
after
the
end
of
the
initial
compliance
period
described
in
§
63.3560
is
the
end
of
a
compliance
period
consisting
of
that
month
and
the
preceding
11
months.
You
must
perform
the
calculations
in
§
63.3561
on
a
monthly
basis
using
data
from
the
previous
12
months
of
operation.
(
b)
If
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
for
any
12­
month
compliance
period
exceeded
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490,
that
is
a
deviation
from
the
emission
limitation
for
that
compliance
period
and
must
be
reported
as
specified
in
§
§
63.3510(
b)(
6)
and
63.3520(
a)(
7).
(
c)
You
must
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
with
each
operating
limit
required
by
§
63.3492
that
applies
to
you
as
specified
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart.
(
1)
If
an
operating
parameter
is
out
of
the
allowed
range
specified
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart,
this
is
a
deviation
from
the
operating
limit
that
must
be
reported
as
specified
in
§
§
63.3510(
b)(
6)
and
63.3520(
a)(
7).
(
2)
If
an
operating
parameter
deviates
from
the
operating
limit
specified
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart,
then
you
must
assume
that
the
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
were
achieving
zero
efficiency
during
the
time
period
of
the
deviation.
For
the
purposes
of
completing
the
compliance
calculations
specified
in
§
63.3561(
h),
you
must
treat
the
materials
used
during
a
deviation
on
a
controlled
coating
operation
as
if
they
were
used
on
an
uncontrolled
coating
operation
for
the
time
period
of
the
deviation
as
indicated
in
Equation
1
of
§
63.3561.
(
d)
You
must
meet
the
requirements
for
bypass
lines
in
§
63.3568(
b)
for
controlled
coating
operations
for
which
you
do
not
conduct
material
balances.
If
any
bypass
line
is
opened
and
emissions
are
diverted
to
the
atmosphere
when
the
coating
operation
is
running,
this
is
a
deviation
that
must
be
reported
as
specified
in
§
§
63.3510(
b)(
6)
and
63.3520(
a)(
7).
For
the
purposes
of
completing
the
compliance
calculations
specified
in
§
§
63.3561(
h),
you
must
treat
the
materials
used
during
a
deviation
on
a
controlled
coating
operation
as
if
they
were
used
on
an
uncontrolled
coating
operation
for
the
time
period
of
the
deviation
as
indicated
in
Equation
1
of
§
63.3561.
(
e)
You
must
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
with
the
work
practice
standards
in
§
63.3493.
If
you
did
not
develop
a
work
practice
plan
or
you
did
not
implement
the
plan
or
you
did
not
keep
the
records
required
by
§
63.3530(
k)(
8),
that
is
a
deviation
from
the
work
practice
standards
that
must
be
reported
as
specified
in
§
§
63.3510(
b)(
6)
and
63.3520(
a)(
7).
(
f)
As
part
of
each
semiannual
compliance
report
required
in
§
63.3520,
you
must
identify
the
coating
operation(
s)
for
which
you
used
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option.
If
there
were
no
deviations
from
the
emission
limitations,
submit
a
statement
that
you
were
in
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations
during
the
reporting
period
because
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
for
each
compliance
period
was
less
than
or
equal
to
the
applicable
emission
limit
in
§
63.3490
and
you
achieved
the
operating
limits
required
by
§
63.3492
and
the
work
practice
standards
required
by
§
63.3493
during
each
compliance
period.
(
g)
During
periods
of
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
of
the
emission
capture
system,
add­
on
control
device,
or
coating
operation
that
may
affect
emission
capture
or
control
device
efficiency,
you
must
operate
in
accordance
with
the
SSMP
required
by
§
63.3500(
c).
(
h)
Consistent
with
§
§
63.6(
e)
and
63.7(
e)(
1),
deviations
that
occur
during
a
period
of
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
of
the
emission
capture
system,
add­
on
control
device,
or
coating
operation
that
may
affect
emission
capture
or
control
device
efficiency
are
not
violations
if
you
demonstrate
to
the
Administrator's
satisfaction
that
you
were
operating
in
accordance
with
the
SSMP.
The
Administrator
will
determine
whether
deviations
that
occur
during
a
period
you
identify
as
a
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
are
violations
according
to
the
provisions
in
§
63.6(
e).
(
i)
[
Reserved]
(
j)
You
must
maintain
records
as
specified
in
§
§
63.3530
and
63.3531.

§
63.3564
What
are
the
general
requirements
for
performance
tests?

(
a)
You
must
conduct
each
performance
test
required
by
§
63.3560
according
to
the
requirements
in
§
63.7(
e)(
1)
and
under
the
conditions
in
this
section
unless
you
obtain
a
waiver
of
the
performance
test
according
to
the
provisions
in
§
63.7(
h).
(
1)
Representative
coating
operation
operating
conditions.
You
must
conduct
the
performance
test
under
representative
operating
conditions
for
the
coating
operation.
Operations
during
periods
of
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
and
during
periods
of
nonoperation
do
not
constitute
representative
conditions.
You
must
record
the
process
information
that
is
necessary
to
document
operating
conditions
during
the
test
and
explain
why
the
conditions
represent
normal
operation.
(
2)
Representative
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
operating
conditions.
You
must
conduct
the
performance
test
when
the
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
are
operating
at
a
representative
flow
rate
and
the
add­
on
control
device
is
operating
at
a
representative
inlet
concentration.
You
must
record
information
that
is
necessary
to
document
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
operating
conditions
during
the
test
and
explain
why
the
conditions
represent
normal
operation.
(
b)
You
must
conduct
each
performance
test
of
an
emission
capture
system
according
to
the
requirements
in
§
63.3565.
You
must
conduct
each
performance
test
of
an
add­
on
control
device
according
to
the
requirements
in
§
63.3566.

§
63.3565
How
do
I
determine
the
emission
capture
system
efficiency?

You
must
use
the
procedures
and
test
methods
in
this
section
to
determine
capture
efficiency
as
part
of
the
performance
test
required
by
§
63.3560.
(
a)
Assuming
100
percent
capture
efficiency.
You
may
assume
the
capture
system
efficiency
is
100
percent
if
both
of
the
conditions
in
paragraphs
(
a)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section
are
met:
(
1)
The
capture
system
meets
the
criteria
in
Method
204
of
appendix
M
to
40
CFR
part
51
for
a
PTE
and
directs
all
the
exhaust
gases
from
the
enclosure
to
an
add­
on
control
device.
(
2)
All
coatings
and
thinners
used
in
the
coating
operation
are
applied
within
the
capture
system
and
coating
solvent
flash­
off
and
coating,
curing,
and
drying
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00038
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2147
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
occurs
within
the
capture
system.
For
example,
the
criterion
is
not
met
if
parts
enter
the
open
shop
environment
when
being
moved
between
a
spray
booth
and
a
curing
oven.
(
b)
Measuring
capture
efficiency.
If
the
capture
system
does
not
meet
both
of
the
criteria
in
paragraphs
(
a)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section,
then
you
must
use
one
of
the
three
protocols
described
in
paragraphs
(
c),
(
d),
and
(
e)
of
this
section
to
measure
capture
efficiency.
The
capture
efficiency
measurements
use
TVH
capture
efficiency
as
a
surrogate
for
organic
HAP
capture
efficiency.
For
the
protocols
in
paragraphs
(
c)
and
(
d)
of
this
section,
the
capture
efficiency
measurement
must
consist
of
three
test
runs.
Each
test
run
must
be
at
least
3
hours
duration
or
the
length
of
a
production
run,
whichever
is
longer,
up
to
8
hours.
For
the
purposes
of
this
test,
a
production
run
means
the
time
required
for
a
single
part
to
go
from
the
beginning
to
the
end
of
production,
which
includes
surface
preparation
activities
and
drying
or
curing
time.
(
c)
Liquid­
to­
uncaptured­
gas
protocol
using
a
temporary
total
enclosure
or
building
enclosure.
The
liquid­
touncaptured
gas
protocol
compares
the
mass
of
liquid
TVH
in
materials
used
in
the
coating
operation
to
the
mass
of
TVH
emissions
not
captured
by
the
emission
capture
system.
Use
a
TTE
or
a
building
enclosure
and
the
procedures
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
1)
through
(
6)
of
this
section
to
measure
emission
capture
system
efficiency
using
the
liquid­
touncaptured
gas
protocol.
(
1)
Either
use
a
building
enclosure
or
construct
an
enclosure
around
the
coating
operation
where
coatings
and
thinners
are
applied
and
all
areas
where
emissions
from
these
applied
coatings
and
materials
subsequently
occur,
such
as
flash­
off,
curing,
and
drying
areas.
The
areas
of
the
coating
operation
where
capture
devices
collect
emissions
for
routing
to
an
add­
on
control
device
such
as
the
entrance
and
exit
areas
of
an
oven
or
spray
booth,
must
also
be
inside
the
enclosure.
The
enclosure
must
meet
the
applicable
definition
of
a
TTE
or
building
enclosure
in
Method
204
of
appendix
M
to
40
CFR
part
51.
(
2)
Use
Method
204A
or
204F
of
appendix
M
to
40
CFR
part
51
to
determine
the
mass
fraction
of
TVH
liquid
input
from
each
coating
and
thinner
used
in
the
coating
operation
during
each
capture
efficiency
test
run.
To
make
the
determination,
substitute
TVH
for
each
occurrence
of
the
term
volatile
organic
compounds
(
VOC)
in
the
methods.
(
3)
Use
Equation
1
of
this
section
to
calculate
the
total
mass
of
TVH
liquid
input
from
all
the
coatings
and
thinners
used
in
the
coating
operation
during
each
capture
efficiency
test
run.

TVH
TVH
Vol
D
(
Eq.
1)
used
i
i
i
i=
1
n
=
(
)(
)(
)
 

Where:

TVHused
=
total
mass
of
liquid
TVH
in
materials
used
in
the
coating
operation
during
the
capture
efficiency
test
run,
kg.
TVHi
=
mass
fraction
of
TVH
in
coating
or
thinner,
i,
that
is
used
in
the
coating
operation
during
the
capture
efficiency
test
run,
kg
TVH
per
kg
material
Voli
=
total
volume
of
coating
or
thinner,
i,
used
in
the
coating
operation
during
the
capture
efficiency
test
run,
liters.
Di
=
density
of
coating
or
thinner,
i,
kg
material
per
liter
material.
n
=
number
of
different
coatings
and
thinners
used
in
the
coating
operation
during
the
capture
efficiency
test
run.
(
4)
Use
Method
204D
or
E
of
appendix
M
to
40
CFR
part
51
to
measure
the
total
mass,
kg,
of
TVH
emissions
that
are
not
captured
by
the
emission
capture
system;
they
are
measured
as
they
exit
the
TTE
or
building
enclosure
during
each
capture
efficiency
test
run.
To
make
the
measurement,
substitute
TVH
for
each
occurrence
of
the
term
VOC
in
the
methods.
(
i)
Use
Method
204D
of
appendix
M
to
40
CFR
part
51
if
the
enclosure
is
a
TTE.
(
ii)
Use
Method
204E
of
appendix
M
to
40
CFR
part
51
if
the
enclosure
is
a
building
enclosure.
During
the
capture
efficiency
measurement,
all
organic
compound
emitting
operations
inside
the
building
enclosure
other
than
the
coating
operation
for
which
capture
efficiency
is
being
determined
must
be
shut
down
but
all
fans
and
blowers
must
be
operating
normally.
(
5)
For
each
capture
efficiency
test
run,
determine
the
percent
capture
efficiency
of
the
emission
capture
system
using
Equation
2
of
this
section.

CE
=
TVH
TVH
TVH
(
Eq.
2)
used
uncaptured
used
 
(
)
×
100
Where:
CE
=
capture
efficiency
of
the
emission
capture
system
vented
to
the
add­
on
control
device,
percent.
TVHused
=
total
mass
of
liquid
TVH
used
in
the
coating
operation
during
the
capture
efficiency
test
run,
kg.
TVHuncaptured
=
total
mass
of
TVH
that
is
not
captured
by
the
emission
capture
system
and
that
exits
from
the
TTE
or
building
enclosure
during
the
capture
efficiency
test
run,
kg,
determined
according
to
paragraph
(
c)(
4)
of
this
section.
(
6)
Determine
the
capture
efficiency
of
the
emission
capture
system
as
the
average
of
the
capture
efficiencies
measured
in
the
three
test
runs.
(
d)
Gas­
to­
gas
protocol
using
a
temporary
total
enclosure
or
a
building
enclosure.
The
gas­
to­
gas
protocol
compares
the
mass
of
TVH
emissions
captured
by
the
emission
capture
system
to
the
mass
of
TVH
emissions
not
captured.
Use
a
TTE
or
a
building
enclosure
and
the
procedures
in
paragraphs
(
d)(
1)
through
(
5)
of
this
section
to
measure
emission
capture
system
efficiency
using
the
gas­
to­
gas
protocol.
(
1)
Either
use
a
building
enclosure
or
construct
an
enclosure
around
the
coating
operation
where
coatings
and
thinners
are
applied
and
all
areas
where
emissions
from
these
applied
coatings
and
materials
subsequently
occur
such
as
flash­
off,
curing,
and
drying
areas.
The
areas
of
the
coating
operation
where
capture
devices
collect
emissions
generated
by
the
coating
operation
for
routing
to
an
add­
on
control
device
such
as
the
entrance
and
exit
areas
of
an
oven
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00039
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
EP15JA03.016</
GPH>
EP15JA03.017</
GPH>
2148
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
or
a
spray
booth
must
also
be
inside
the
enclosure.
The
enclosure
must
meet
the
applicable
definition
of
a
TTE
or
building
enclosure
in
Method
204
of
appendix
M
to
40
CFR
part
51.
(
2)
Use
Method
204B
or
204C
of
appendix
M
to
40
CFR
part
51
to
measure
the
total
mass,
kg,
of
TVH
emissions
captured
by
the
emission
capture
system
during
each
capture
efficiency
test
run
as
measured
at
the
inlet
to
the
add­
on
control
device.
To
make
the
measurement,
substitute
TVH
for
each
occurrence
of
the
term
VOC
in
the
methods.
(
i)
The
sampling
points
for
the
Method
204B
or
204C
of
appendix
M
to
40
CFR
part
51
measurement
must
be
upstream
from
the
add­
on
control
device
and
must
represent
total
emissions
routed
from
the
capture
system
and
entering
the
add­
on
control
device.
(
ii)
If
multiple
emission
streams
from
the
capture
system
enter
the
add­
on
control
device
without
a
single
common
duct,
then
the
emissions
entering
the
add­
on
control
device
must
be
simultaneously
measured
in
each
duct
and
the
total
emissions
entering
the
add­
on
control
device
must
be
determined.
(
3)
Use
Method
204D
or
204E
of
appendix
M
to
40
CFR
part
51
to
measure
the
total
mass,
kg,
of
TVH
emissions
that
are
not
captured
by
the
emission
capture
system;
they
are
measured
as
they
exit
the
TTE
or
building
enclosure
during
each
capture
efficiency
test
run.
To
make
the
measurement,
substitute
TVH
for
each
occurrence
of
the
term
VOC
in
the
methods.
(
i)
Use
Method
204D
of
appendix
M
to
40
CFR
part
51
if
the
enclosure
is
a
TTE.
(
ii)
Use
Method
204E
of
appendix
M
to
40
CFR
part
51
if
the
enclosure
is
a
building
enclosure.
During
the
capture
efficiency
measurement,
all
organic
compound
emitting
operations
inside
the
building
enclosure,
other
than
the
coating
operation
for
which
capture
efficiency
is
being
determined
must
be
shut
down,
but
all
fans
and
blowers
must
be
operating
normally.
(
4)
For
each
capture
efficiency
test
run,
determine
the
percent
capture
efficiency
of
the
emission
capture
system
using
Equation
3
of
this
section.

CE
=
TVH
TVH
(
Eq.
3)
captured
captured
+
(
)
×
TVHuncaptured
100
Where:
CE
=
capture
efficiency
of
the
emission
capture
system
vented
to
the
add­
on
control
device,
percent.
TVHcaptured
=
total
mass
of
TVH
captured
by
the
emission
capture
system
as
measured
at
the
inlet
to
the
add­
on
control
device
during
the
emission
capture
efficiency
test
run,
kg,
determined
according
to
paragraph
(
d)(
2)
of
this
section.
TVHuncaptured
=
total
mass
of
TVH
that
is
not
captured
by
the
emission
capture
system
and
that
exits
from
the
TTE
or
building
enclosure
during
the
capture
efficiency
test
run,
kg,
determined
according
to
paragraph
(
d)(
3)
of
this
section.
(
5)
Determine
the
capture
efficiency
of
the
emission
capture
system
as
the
average
of
the
capture
efficiencies
measured
in
the
three
test
runs.
(
e)
Alternative
capture
efficiency
protocol.
As
an
alternative
to
the
procedures
specified
in
paragraphs
(
c)
and
(
d)
of
this
section,
you
may
determine
capture
efficiency
using
any
other
capture
efficiency
protocol
and
test
methods
that
satisfy
the
criteria
of
either
the
DQO
or
LCL
approach
as
described
in
appendix
A
to
subpart
KK
of
this
part.

§
63.3566
How
do
I
determine
the
add­
on
control
device
emission
destruction
or
removal
efficiency?
You
must
use
the
procedures
and
test
methods
in
this
section
to
determine
the
add­
on
control
device
emission
destruction
or
removal
efficiency
as
part
of
the
performance
test
required
by
§
63.3560.
You
must
conduct
three
test
runs
as
specified
in
§
63.7(
e)(
3)
and
each
test
run
must
last
at
least
1
hour.
(
a)
For
all
types
of
add­
on
control
devices,
use
the
test
methods
specified
in
paragraphs
(
a)(
1)
through
(
5)
of
this
section.
(
1)
Use
Method
1
or
1A
of
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60,
as
appropriate,
to
select
sampling
sites
and
velocity
traverse
points.
(
2)
Use
Method
2,
2A,
2C,
2D,
2F,
or
2G
of
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60,
as
appropriate,
to
measure
gas
volumetric
flow
rate.
(
3)
Use
Method
3,
3A,
or
3B
of
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60,
as
appropriate,
for
gas
analysis
to
determine
dry
molecular
weight.
You
may
also
use
as
an
alternative
to
Method
3B
the
manual
method
for
measuring
the
oxygen,
carbon
dioxide,
and
carbon
monoxide
content
of
exhaust
gas
in
ANSI/
ASME
PTC
19.10
 
1981,
``
Flue
and
Exhaust
Gas
Analyses.''
(
4)
Use
Method
4
of
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60
to
determine
stack
gas
moisture.
(
5)
Methods
for
determining
gas
volumetric
flow
rate,
dry
molecular
weight,
and
stack
gas
moisture
must
be
performed,
as
applicable,
during
each
test
run.
(
b)
Measure
total
gaseous
organic
mass
emissions
as
carbon
at
the
inlet
and
outlet
of
the
add­
on
control
device
simultaneously
using
either
Method
25
or
25A
of
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60
as
specified
in
paragraphs
(
b)(
1)
through
(
5)
of
this
section.
You
must
use
the
same
method
for
both
the
inlet
and
outlet
measurements.
(
1)
Use
Method
25
of
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60
if
the
add­
on
control
device
is
an
oxidizer
and
you
expect
the
total
gaseous
organic
concentration
as
carbon
to
be
more
than
50
parts
per
million
(
ppm)
at
the
control
device
outlet.
(
2)
Use
Method
25A
of
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60
if
the
add­
on
control
device
is
an
oxidizer
and
you
expect
the
total
gaseous
organic
concentration
as
carbon
to
be
50
ppm
or
less
at
the
control
device
outlet.
(
3)
Use
Method
25A
of
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60
if
the
add­
control
device
is
not
an
oxidizer.
(
4)
You
may
use
Method
18
of
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60
to
subtract
methane
emissions
from
measured
total
gaseous
organic
mass
emissions
as
carbon.
(
5)
Alternatively,
any
other
test
method
or
data
that
have
been
validated
according
to
the
applicable
procedures
in
Method
301
of
40
CFR
part
63,
appendix
A,
and
approved
by
the
Administrator
may
be
used.
(
c)
If
two
or
more
add­
on
control
devices
are
used
for
the
same
emission
stream,
then
you
must
measure
emissions
at
the
outlet
of
each
device.
For
example,
if
one
add­
on
control
device
is
a
concentrator
with
an
outlet
for
the
high­
volume
dilute
stream
that
has
been
treated
by
the
concentrator
and
a
second
add­
on
control
device
is
an
oxidizer
with
an
outlet
for
the
lowvolume
concentrated
stream
that
is
treated
with
the
oxidizer,
you
must
measure
emissions
at
the
outlet
of
the
oxidizer
and
the
high
volume
dilute
stream
outlet
of
the
concentrator.

VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00040
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
EP15JA03.018</
GPH>
2149
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
(
d)
For
each
test
run,
determine
the
total
gaseous
organic
emissions
mass
flow
rates
for
the
inlet
and
the
outlet
of
the
add­
on
control
device,
using
Equation
1
of
this
section.
If
there
is
more
than
one
inlet
or
outlet
to
the
addon
control
device,
you
must
calculate
the
total
gaseous
organic
mass
flow
rate
using
Equation
1
of
this
section
for
each
inlet
and
each
outlet
and
then
total
all
of
the
inlet
emissions
and
total
all
of
the
outlet
emissions.

M
Q
C
10
(
Eq.
1)
f
sd
c
=
(
)(
)(
)
 
12
0
0416
6
.

Where:
Mf
=
total
gaseous
organic
emissions
mass
flow
rate,
kg
per
hour
(
kg/
h).
Cc
=
concentration
of
organic
compounds
as
carbon
in
the
vent
gas,
as
determined
by
Method
25
or
Method
25A,
ppmvd.
Qsd
=
volumetric
flow
rate
of
gases
entering
or
exiting
the
add­
on
control
device,
as
determined
by
Method
2,
2A,
2C,
2D,
2F,
or
2G,
dry
standard
cubic
meters/
hour
(
dscm/
h).
0.0416
=
conversion
factor
for
molar
volume,
kg­
moles
per
cubic
meter
(
mol/
m3)
(@
293
Kelvin
(
K)
and
760
millimeters
of
mercury
(
mmHg)).
(
e)
For
each
test
run,
determine
the
add­
on
control
device
organic
emissions
destruction
or
removal
efficiency,
using
Equation
2
of
this
section.

DRE
=
M
M
M
(
Eq.
2)
fi
fo
fi
100
×
 

Where:
DRE
=
organic
emissions
destruction
or
removal
efficiency
of
the
add­
on
control
device,
percent.
Mfi
=
total
gaseous
organic
emissions
mass
flow
rate
at
the
inlet(
s)
to
the
add­
on
control
device,
using
Equation
1
of
this
section,
kg/
h.
Mfo
=
total
gaseous
organic
emissions
mass
flow
rate
at
the
outlet(
s)
of
the
add­
on
control
device,
using
Equation
1
of
this
section,
kg/
h.
(
f)
Determine
the
emission
destruction
or
removal
efficiency
of
the
add­
on
control
device
as
the
average
of
the
efficiencies
determined
in
the
three
test
runs
and
calculated
in
Equation
2
of
this
section.

§
63.3567
How
do
I
establish
the
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
operating
limits
during
the
performance
test?

During
the
performance
test
required
by
§
63.3560
and
described
in
§
§
63.3564,
63.3565,
and
63.3566,
you
must
establish
the
operating
limits
required
by
§
63.3492
according
to
this
section
unless
you
have
received
approval
for
alternative
monitoring
and
operating
limits
under
§
63.8(
f)
as
specified
in
§
63.3492.
(
a)
Thermal
oxidizers.
If
your
add­
on
control
device
is
a
thermal
oxidizer,
establish
the
operating
limits
according
to
paragraphs
(
a)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section.
(
1)
During
the
performance
test,
you
must
monitor
and
record
the
combustion
temperature
at
least
once
every
15
minutes
during
each
of
the
three
test
runs.
You
must
monitor
the
temperature
in
the
firebox
of
the
thermal
oxidizer
or
immediately
downstream
of
the
firebox
before
any
substantial
heat
exchange
occurs.
(
2)
Use
the
data
collected
during
the
performance
test
to
calculate
and
record
the
average
combustion
temperature
maintained
during
the
performance
test.
That
average
combustion
temperature
is
the
minimum
operating
limit
for
your
thermal
oxidizer.
(
b)
Catalytic
oxidizers.
If
your
add­
on
control
device
is
a
catalytic
oxidizer,
establish
the
operating
limits
according
to
either
paragraphs
(
b)(
1)
and
(
2)
or
paragraphs
(
b)(
3)
and
(
4)
of
this
section.
(
1)
During
the
performance
test,
you
must
monitor
and
record
the
temperature
just
before
the
catalyst
bed
and
the
temperature
difference
across
the
catalyst
bed
at
least
once
every
15
minutes
during
each
of
the
three
test
runs.
(
2)
Use
the
data
collected
during
the
performance
test
to
calculate
and
record
the
average
temperature
just
before
the
catalyst
bed
and
the
average
temperature
difference
across
the
catalyst
bed
maintained
during
the
performance
test.
These
are
the
minimum
operating
limits
for
your
catalytic
oxidizer.
(
3)
As
an
alternative
to
monitoring
the
temperature
difference
across
the
catalyst
bed,
you
may
monitor
the
temperature
at
the
inlet
to
the
catalyst
bed
and
implement
a
site­
specific
inspection
and
maintenance
plan
for
your
catalytic
oxidizer
as
specified
in
paragraph
(
b)(
4)
of
this
section.
During
the
performance
test,
you
must
monitor
and
record
the
temperature
just
before
the
catalyst
bed
at
least
once
every
15
minutes
during
each
of
the
three
test
runs.
Use
the
data
collected
during
the
performance
test
to
calculate
and
record
the
average
temperature
just
before
the
catalyst
bed
during
the
performance
test.
That
is
the
minimum
operating
limit
for
your
catalytic
oxidizer.
(
4)
You
must
develop
and
implement
an
inspection
and
maintenance
plan
for
your
catalytic
oxidizer(
s)
for
which
you
elect
to
monitor
according
to
paragraph
(
b)(
3)
of
this
section.
The
plan
must
address,
at
a
minimum,
the
elements
specified
in
paragraphs
(
b)(
4)(
i)
through
(
iii)
of
this
section.
(
i)
Annual
sampling
and
analysis
of
the
catalyst
activity
(
i.
e,
conversion
efficiency)
following
the
manufacturer's
or
catalyst
supplier's
recommended
procedures.
(
ii)
Monthly
inspection
of
the
oxidizer
system,
including
the
burner
assembly
and
fuel
supply
lines
for
problems
and,
as
necessary,
adjust
the
equipment
to
assure
proper
air­
to­
fuel
mixtures.
(
iii)
Annual
internal
and
monthly
external
visual
inspection
of
the
catalyst
bed
to
check
for
channeling,
abrasion,
and
settling.
If
problems
are
found,
you
must
take
corrective
action
consistent
with
the
manufacturer's
recommendations
and
conduct
a
new
performance
test
to
determine
destruction
efficiency
according
to
§
63.3566.
(
c)
Carbon
adsorbers.
If
your
add­
on
control
device
is
a
carbon
adsorber,
establish
the
operating
limits
according
to
paragraphs
(
c)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section.
(
1)
You
must
monitor
and
record
the
total
regeneration
desorbing
gas
(
e.
g.,
steam
or
nitrogen)
mass
flow
for
each
regeneration
cycle
and
the
carbon
bed
temperature
after
each
carbon
bed
regeneration
and
cooling
cycle
for
the
regeneration
cycle
either
immediately
preceding
or
immediately
following
the
performance
test.
(
2)
The
operating
limits
for
your
carbon
adsorber
are
the
minimum
total
desorbing
gas
mass
flow
recorded
during
the
regeneration
cycle,
and
the
maximum
carbon
bed
temperature
recorded
after
the
cooling
cycle.
(
d)
Condensers.
If
your
add­
on
control
device
is
a
condenser,
establish
the
operating
limits
according
to
paragraphs
(
d)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section.
(
1)
During
the
performance
test,
you
must
monitor
and
record
the
condenser
outlet
(
product
side)
gas
temperature
at
least
once
every
15
minutes
during
each
of
the
three
test
runs.
(
2)
Use
the
data
collected
during
the
performance
test
to
calculate
and
record
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00041
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
EP15JA03.019</
GPH>
EP15JA03.020</
GPH>
2150
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
the
average
condenser
outlet
(
product
side)
gas
temperature
maintained
during
the
performance
test.
This
average
condenser
outlet
gas
temperature
is
the
maximum
operating
limit
for
your
condenser.
(
e)
Concentrators.
If
your
add­
on
control
device
includes
a
concentrator,
you
must
establish
operating
limits
for
the
concentrator
according
to
paragraphs
(
e)(
1)
through
(
4)
of
this
section.
(
1)
During
the
performance
test,
you
must
monitor
and
record
the
desorption
concentrate
stream
gas
temperature
at
least
once
every
15
minutes
during
each
of
the
three
runs
of
the
performance
test.
(
2)
Use
the
data
collected
during
the
performance
test
to
calculate
and
record
the
average
temperature.
This
is
the
minimum
operating
limit
for
the
desorption
concentrate
gas
stream
temperature.
(
3)
During
the
performance
test,
you
must
monitor
and
record
the
pressure
drop
of
the
dilute
stream
across
the
concentrator
at
least
once
every
15
minutes
during
each
of
the
three
runs
of
the
performance
test.
(
4)
Use
the
data
collected
during
the
performance
test
to
calculate
and
record
the
average
pressure
drop.
This
is
the
maximum
operating
limit
for
the
dilute
stream
across
the
concentrator.
(
f)
Emission
capture
systems.
For
each
capture
device
that
is
not
part
of
a
PTE
that
meets
the
criteria
of
§
63.3565(
a),
establish
an
operating
limit
for
either
the
gas
volumetric
flow
rate
or
duct
static
pressure,
as
specified
in
paragraphs
(
f)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section.
The
operating
limit
for
a
PTE
is
specified
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart.
(
1)
During
the
capture
efficiency
determination
required
by
§
63.3560
and
described
in
§
§
63.3564
and
63.3565,
you
must
monitor
and
record
either
the
gas
volumetric
flow
rate
or
the
duct
static
pressure
for
each
separate
capture
device
in
your
emission
capture
system
at
least
once
every
15
minutes
during
each
of
the
three
test
runs
at
a
point
in
the
duct
between
the
capture
device
and
the
add­
on
control
device
inlet.
(
2)
Calculate
and
record
the
average
gas
volumetric
flow
rate
or
duct
static
pressure
for
the
three
test
runs
for
each
capture
device.
This
average
gas
volumetric
flow
rate
or
duct
static
pressure
is
the
minimum
operating
limit
for
that
specific
capture
device.

§
63.3568
What
are
the
requirements
for
continuous
parameter
monitoring
system
installation,
operation,
and
maintenance?

(
a)
General.
You
must
install,
operate,
and
maintain
each
CPMS
specified
in
paragraphs
(
c),
(
e),
(
f),
and
(
g)
of
this
section
according
to
paragraphs
(
a)(
1)
through
(
6)
of
this
section.
You
must
install,
operate,
and
maintain
each
CPMS
specified
in
paragraphs
(
b)
and
(
d)
of
this
section
according
to
paragraphs
(
a)(
3)
through
(
5)
of
this
section.
(
1)
The
CPMS
must
complete
a
minimum
of
one
cycle
of
operation
for
each
successive
15­
minute
period.
You
must
have
a
minimum
of
four
equally
spaced
successive
cycles
of
CPMS
operation
in
1
hour.
(
2)
You
must
determine
the
average
of
all
recorded
readings
for
each
successive
3­
hour
period
of
the
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
operation.
(
3)
You
must
record
the
results
of
each
inspection,
calibration,
and
validation
check
of
the
CPMS.
(
4)
You
must
maintain
the
CPMS
at
all
times
and
have
available
necessary
parts
for
routine
repairs
of
the
monitoring
equipment.
(
5)
You
must
operate
the
CPMS
and
collect
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
parameter
data
at
all
times
that
a
controlled
coating
operation
is
operating,
except
during
monitoring
malfunctions,
associated
repairs,
and
required
quality
assurance
or
control
activities
(
including,
if
applicable,
calibration
checks
and
required
zero
and
span
adjustments).
(
6)
You
must
not
use
emission
capture
system
or
add­
on
control
device
parameter
data
recorded
during
monitoring
malfunctions,
associated
repairs,
out
of
control
periods,
or
required
quality
assurance
or
control
activities
when
calculating
data
averages.
You
must
use
all
the
data
collected
during
all
other
periods
in
calculating
the
data
averages
for
determining
compliance
with
the
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
operating
limits.
(
7)
A
monitoring
malfunction
is
any
sudden,
infrequent,
not
reasonably
preventable
failure
of
the
CPMS
to
provide
valid
data.
Monitoring
failures
that
are
caused
in
part
by
poor
maintenance
or
careless
operation
are
not
malfunctions.
Any
period
for
which
the
monitoring
system
is
out
of
control
and
data
are
not
available
for
required
calculations
is
a
deviation
from
the
monitoring
requirements.
(
b)
Capture
system
bypass
line.
You
must
meet
the
requirements
of
paragraphs
(
b)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section
for
each
emission
capture
system
that
contains
bypass
lines
that
could
divert
emissions
away
from
the
add­
on
control
device
to
the
atmosphere.
(
1)
You
must
monitor
or
secure
the
valve
or
closure
mechanism
controlling
the
bypass
line
in
a
nondiverting
position
in
such
a
way
that
the
valve
or
closure
mechanism
cannot
be
opened
without
creating
a
record
that
the
valve
was
opened.
The
method
used
to
monitor
or
secure
the
valve
or
closure
mechanism
must
meet
one
of
the
requirements
specified
in
paragraphs
(
b)(
1)(
i)
through
(
iv)
of
this
section.
(
i)
Flow
control
position
indicator.
Install,
calibrate,
maintain,
and
operate
according
to
the
manufacturer's
specifications
a
flow
control
position
indicator
that
takes
a
reading
at
least
once
every
15
minutes
and
provides
a
record
indicating
whether
the
emissions
are
directed
to
the
add­
on
control
device
or
diverted
from
the
add­
on
control
device.
The
time
of
occurrence
and
flow
control
position
must
be
recorded
as
well
as
every
time
the
flow
direction
is
changed.
The
flow
control
position
indicator
must
be
installed
at
the
entrance
to
any
bypass
line
that
could
divert
the
emissions
away
from
the
addon
control
device
to
the
atmosphere.
(
ii)
Car­
seal
or
lock­
and­
key
valve
closures.
Secure
any
bypass
line
valve
in
the
closed
position
with
a
car­
seal
or
a
lock­
and­
key
type
configuration.
You
must
visually
inspect
the
seal
or
closure
mechanism
at
least
once
every
month
to
ensure
that
the
valve
is
maintained
in
the
closed
position
and
the
emissions
are
not
diverted
away
from
the
add­
on
control
device
to
the
atmosphere.
(
iii)
Valve
closure
monitoring.
Ensure
that
any
bypass
line
valve
is
in
the
closed
(
non­
diverting)
position
through
monitoring
of
valve
position
at
least
once
every
15
minutes.
You
must
inspect
the
monitoring
system
at
least
once
every
month
to
verify
that
the
monitor
will
indicate
valve
position.
(
iv)
Automatic
shutdown
system.
Use
an
automatic
shutdown
system
in
which
the
coating
operation
is
stopped
when
flow
is
diverted
by
the
bypass
line
away
from
the
add­
on
control
device
to
the
atmosphere
when
the
coating
operation
is
running.
You
must
inspect
the
automatic
shutdown
system
at
least
once
every
month
to
verify
that
it
will
detect
diversions
of
flow
and
shut
down
the
coating
operation.
(
2)
If
any
bypass
line
is
opened,
you
must
include
a
description
of
why
the
bypass
line
was
opened
and
the
length
of
time
it
remained
open
in
the
semiannual
compliance
reports
required
in
§
63.3520.
(
c)
Thermal
oxidizers
and
catalytic
oxidizers.
If
you
are
using
a
thermal
oxidizer
or
catalytic
oxidizer
as
an
addon
control
device
(
including
those
used
with
concentrators
or
with
carbon
adsorbers
to
treat
desorbed
concentrate
streams),
you
must
comply
with
the
requirements
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
1)
through
(
3)
of
this
section.

VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00042
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2151
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
(
1)
For
a
thermal
oxidizer,
install
a
gas
temperature
monitor
in
the
firebox
of
the
thermal
oxidizer
or
in
the
duct
immediately
downstream
of
the
firebox
before
any
substantial
heat
exchange
occurs.
(
2)
For
a
catalytic
oxidizer,
install
a
gas
temperature
monitor
in
the
gas
stream
immediately
before
the
catalyst
bed,
and
if
you
establish
operating
limits
according
to
§
63.3567(
b)(
1)
and
(
2),
also
install
a
gas
temperature
monitor
in
the
gas
stream
immediately
after
the
catalyst
bed.
(
i)
If
you
establish
operating
limits
according
to
§
63.3567(
b)(
1)
and
(
2),
then
you
must
install
the
gas
temperature
monitors
both
upstream
and
downstream
of
the
catalyst
bed.
The
temperature
monitors
must
be
in
the
gas
stream
immediately
before
and
after
the
catalyst
bed
to
measure
the
temperature
difference
across
the
bed.
(
ii)
If
you
establish
operating
limits
according
to
§
63.3567(
b)(
3)
and
(
4),
then
you
must
install
a
gas
temperature
monitor
upstream
of
the
catalyst
bed.
The
temperature
monitor
must
be
in
the
gas
stream
immediately
before
the
catalyst
bed
to
measure
the
temperature.
(
3)
For
all
thermal
oxidizers
and
catalytic
oxidizers,
you
must
meet
the
requirements
in
paragraphs
(
a)
and
(
c)(
3)(
i)
through
(
vii)
of
this
section
for
each
gas
temperature
monitoring
device.
(
i)
Locate
the
temperature
sensor
in
a
position
that
provides
a
representative
temperature.
(
ii)
Use
a
temperature
sensor
with
a
measurement
sensitivity
of
4
degrees
Fahrenheit
or
0.75
percent
of
the
temperature
value,
whichever
is
larger.
(
iii)
Shield
the
temperature
sensor
system
from
electromagnetic
interference
and
chemical
contaminants.
(
iv)
If
a
gas
temperature
chart
recorder
is
used,
it
must
have
a
measurement
sensitivity
in
the
minor
division
of
at
least
20
degrees
Fahrenheit.
(
v)
Perform
an
electronic
calibration
at
least
semiannually
according
to
the
procedures
in
the
manufacturer's
owners
manual.
Following
the
electronic
calibration,
you
must
conduct
a
temperature
sensor
validation
check
in
which
a
second
or
redundant
temperature
sensor
placed
nearby
the
process
temperature
sensor
must
yield
a
reading
within
30
degrees
Fahrenheit
of
the
process
temperature
sensor
reading.
(
vi)
Conduct
calibration
and
validation
checks
any
time
the
sensor
exceeds
the
manufacturer's
specified
maximum
operating
temperature
range
or
install
a
new
temperature
sensor.
(
vii)
At
least
monthly,
inspect
components
for
integrity
and
electrical
connections
for
continuity,
oxidation,
and
galvanic
corrosion.
(
d)
Carbon
adsorbers.
If
you
are
using
a
carbon
adsorber
as
an
add­
on
control
device,
you
must
monitor
the
total
regeneration
desorbing
gas
(
e.
g.,
steam
or
nitrogen)
mass
flow
for
each
regeneration
cycle,
the
carbon
bed
temperature
after
each
regeneration
and
cooling
cycle,
and
comply
with
paragraphs
(
a)(
3)
through
(
5)
and
(
d)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section.
(
1)
The
regeneration
desorbing
gas
mass
flow
monitor
must
be
an
integrating
device
having
a
measurement
sensitivity
of
plus
or
minus
10
percent
capable
of
recording
the
total
regeneration
desorbing
gas
mass
flow
for
each
regeneration
cycle.
(
2)
The
carbon
bed
temperature
monitor
must
have
a
measurement
sensitivity
of
1
percent
of
the
temperature
recorded
or
1
degree
Fahrenheit,
whichever
is
greater,
and
must
be
capable
of
recording
the
temperature
within
15
minutes
of
completing
any
carbon
bed
cooling
cycle.
(
e)
Condensers.
If
you
are
using
a
condenser,
you
must
monitor
the
condenser
outlet
(
product
side)
gas
temperature
and
comply
with
paragraphs
(
a)
and
(
e)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section.
(
1)
The
gas
temperature
monitor
must
have
a
measurement
sensitivity
of
1
percent
of
the
temperature
recorded
or
1
degree
Fahrenheit,
whichever
is
greater.
(
2)
The
temperature
monitor
must
provide
a
gas
temperature
record
at
least
once
every
15
minutes.
(
f)
Concentrators.
If
you
are
using
a
concentrator
such
as
a
zeolite
wheel
or
rotary
carbon
bed
concentrator,
you
must
comply
with
the
requirements
in
paragraphs
(
f)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section.
(
1)
You
must
install
a
temperature
monitor
in
the
desorption
gas
stream.
The
temperature
monitor
must
meet
the
requirements
in
paragraphs
(
a)
and
(
c)(
3)
of
this
section.
(
2)
You
must
install
a
device
to
monitor
pressure
drop
across
the
zeolite
wheel
or
rotary
carbon
bed.
The
pressure
monitoring
device
must
meet
the
requirements
in
paragraphs
(
a)
and
(
f)(
2)(
i)
through
(
vii)
of
this
section.
(
i)
Locate
the
pressure
sensor(
s)
in
or
as
close
to
a
position
that
provides
a
representative
measurement
of
the
pressure.
(
ii)
Minimize
or
eliminate
pulsating
pressure,
vibration,
and
internal
and
external
corrosion.
(
iii)
Use
a
gauge
with
a
minimum
tolerance
of
0.5
inch
of
water
or
a
transducer
with
a
minimum
tolerance
of
1
percent
of
the
pressure
range.
(
iv)
Check
the
pressure
tap
daily.
(
v)
Using
a
manometer,
check
gauge
calibration
quarterly
and
transducer
calibration
monthly.
(
vi)
Conduct
calibration
checks
anytime
the
sensor
exceeds
the
manufacturer's
specified
maximum
operating
pressure
range
or
install
a
new
pressure
sensor.
(
vii)
At
least
monthly,
inspect
components
for
integrity,
electrical
connections
for
continuity,
and
mechanical
connections
for
leakage.
(
g)
Emission
capture
systems.
The
capture
system
monitoring
system
must
comply
with
the
applicable
requirements
in
paragraphs
(
g)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section.
(
1)
For
each
flow
measurement
device,
you
must
meet
the
requirements
in
paragraphs
(
a)
and
(
g)(
1)(
i)
through
(
iv)
of
this
section.
(
i)
Locate
a
flow
sensor
in
a
position
that
provides
a
representative
flow
measurement
in
the
duct
from
each
capture
device
in
the
emission
capture
system
to
the
add­
on
control
device.
(
ii)
Reduce
swirling
flow
or
abnormal
velocity
distributions
due
to
upstream
and
downstream
disturbances.
(
iii)
Conduct
a
flow
sensor
calibration
check
at
least
semiannually.
(
iv)
At
least
monthly,
inspect
components
for
integrity,
electrical
connections
for
continuity,
and
mechanical
connections
for
leakage.
(
2)
For
each
pressure
drop
measurement
device,
you
must
comply
with
the
requirements
in
paragraphs
(
a)
and
(
g)(
2)(
i)
through
(
vi)
of
this
section.
(
i)
Locate
the
pressure
sensor(
s)
in
or
as
close
to
a
position
that
provides
a
representative
measurement
of
the
pressure
drop
across
each
opening
you
are
monitoring.
(
ii)
Minimize
or
eliminate
pulsating
pressure,
vibration,
and
internal
and
external
corrosion.
(
iii)
Check
pressure
tap
pluggage
daily.
(
iv)
Using
an
inclined
manometer
with
a
measurement
sensitivity
of
0.0002
inch
water,
check
gauge
calibration
quarterly
and
transducer
calibration
monthly.
(
v)
Conduct
calibration
checks
any
time
the
sensor
exceeds
the
manufacturer's
specified
maximum
operating
pressure
range
or
install
a
new
pressure
sensor.
(
vi)
At
least
monthly,
inspect
components
for
integrity,
electrical
connections
for
continuity,
and
mechanical
connections
for
leakage.

VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00043
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2152
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
Compliance
Requirements
for
the
Control
Efficiency/
Outlet
Concentration
Option
§
63.3570
By
what
date
must
I
conduct
performance
tests
and
other
initial
compliance
demonstrations?

(
a)
New
and
reconstructed
affected
sources.
For
a
new
or
reconstructed
source,
you
must
meet
the
requirements
of
paragraphs
(
a)(
1)
through
(
4)
of
this
section.
(
1)
All
emission
capture
systems,
addon
control
devices,
and
CPMS
must
be
installed
and
operating
no
later
than
the
applicable
compliance
date
specified
in
§
63.3483.
You
must
conduct
a
performance
test
of
each
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
according
to
§
§
63.3574,
63.3575,
and
63.3576
and
establish
the
operating
limits
required
by
§
63.3492
no
later
than
180
days
after
the
applicable
compliance
date
specified
in
§
63.3483.
(
2)
You
must
develop
and
begin
implementing
the
work
practice
plan
required
by
§
63.3493
no
later
than
the
compliance
date
specified
in
§
63.3483.
(
3)
You
must
complete
the
initial
compliance
demonstration
for
the
initial
compliance
period
according
to
the
requirements
of
§
63.3571.
The
initial
compliance
period
begins
on
the
applicable
compliance
date
specified
in
§
63.3483
and
ends
on
the
last
day
of
the
twelfth
month
following
the
compliance
date.
If
the
compliance
date
occurs
on
any
day
other
than
the
first
day
of
a
month,
then
the
initial
compliance
period
extends
through
the
end
of
that
month
plus
the
next
12
months.
The
initial
compliance
demonstration
includes
the
results
of
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
performance
tests
conducted
according
to
§
63.3574,
63.3575,
and
63.3576,
the
operating
limits
established
during
the
performance
tests
and
the
results
of
the
continuous
parameter
monitoring
required
by
§
63.3578,
and
documentation
of
whether
you
developed
and
implemented
the
work
practice
plan
required
by
§
63.3493.
(
4)
You
do
not
need
to
comply
with
the
operating
limits
for
the
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
required
by
§
63.3492
until
after
you
have
completed
the
performance
tests
specified
in
paragraph
(
a)(
1)
of
this
section.
Instead,
you
must
maintain
a
log
detailing
the
operation
and
maintenance
of
the
emission
capture
system,
add­
on
control
device,
and
continuous
parameter
monitors
during
the
period
between
the
compliance
date
and
the
performance
test.
You
must
begin
complying
with
the
operating
limits
on
the
date
you
complete
the
performance
tests
specified
in
paragraph
(
a)(
1)
of
this
section.
(
b)
Existing
affected
sources.
For
an
existing
affected
source,
you
must
meet
the
requirements
of
paragraphs
(
b)(
1)
through
(
3)
of
this
section.
(
1)
All
emission
capture
systems,
addon
control
devices,
and
CPMS
must
be
installed
and
operating
no
later
than
the
applicable
compliance
date
specified
in
§
63.3483.
(
2)
You
must
develop
and
begin
implementing
the
work
practice
plan
required
by
§
63.3493
no
later
than
the
compliance
date
specified
in
§
63.3483.
(
3)
You
must
complete
the
initial
compliance
demonstration
for
the
initial
compliance
period
according
to
the
requirements
of
§
63.3571.
The
initial
compliance
period
begins
on
the
applicable
compliance
date
specified
in
§
63.3483
and
ends
on
the
last
day
of
the
twelfth
month
following
the
compliance
date.
If
the
compliance
date
occurs
on
any
day
other
than
the
first
day
of
a
month,
then
the
initial
compliance
period
extends
through
the
end
of
that
month
plus
the
next
12
months.
The
initial
compliance
demonstration
includes
the
results
of
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
performance
tests
conducted
according
to
§
§
63.3574,
63.3575,
and
63.3576,
the
operating
limits
established
during
the
performance
tests
and
the
results
of
the
continuous
parameter
monitoring
required
by
§
63.3578,
and
documentation
of
whether
you
developed
and
implemented
the
work
practice
plan
required
by
§
63.3493.

§
63.3571
How
do
I
demonstrate
initial
compliance?
(
a)
You
may
use
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option
for
any
coating
operation,
for
any
group
of
coating
operations
within
a
subcategory
or
coating
type
segment,
or
for
all
of
the
coating
operations
within
a
subcategory
or
coating
type
segment.
You
must
use
the
compliant
material
option,
the
emission
rate
without
addon
controls
option,
or
the
emission
rate
with
add­
on
controls
option
for
any
coating
operation
in
the
affected
source
for
which
you
do
not
use
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option.
To
demonstrate
initial
compliance,
the
coating
operation(
s)
for
which
you
use
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option
must
meet
the
applicable
levels
of
emission
reduction
in
§
63.3490.
You
must
conduct
a
separate
initial
compliance
demonstration
for
each
one
and
twopiece
draw
and
iron
can
body
coating,
sheet
coating,
three­
piece
can
body
assembly
coating,
and
end
lining
affected
source.
(
b)
Compliance
with
operating
limits.
You
must
establish
and
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
during
the
initial
compliance
period
with
the
operating
limits
required
by
§
63.3492,
using
the
procedures
specified
in
§
§
63.3577
and
63.3578.
(
c)
Compliance
with
work
practice
requirements.
You
must
develop,
implement,
and
document
your
implementation
of
the
work
practice
plan
required
by
§
63.3493
during
the
initial
compliance
period,
as
specified
in
§
63.3530.
(
d)
Compliance
demonstration.
To
demonstrate
initial
compliance,
you
must
keep
all
records
applicable
to
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option
as
required
by
§
§
63.3530
and
63.3531.
As
part
of
the
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
required
by
§
63.3510,
you
must
identify
the
coating
operation(
s)
for
which
you
used
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option
and
submit
a
statement
that
the
coating
operation(
s)
was
(
were)
in
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations
during
the
initial
compliance
period
because
you
achieved
the
operating
limits
required
by
§
63.3492
and
the
work
practice
standards
required
by
§
63.3493.

§
63.3572
[
Reserved]

§
63.3573
How
do
I
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations?

(
a)
To
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations
using
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option,
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
for
each
compliance
period
must
be
equal
to
or
less
than
20
ppmvd
or
must
be
reduced
by
the
amounts
specified
in
§
63.3490.
A
compliance
period
consists
of
12
months.
Each
month
after
the
end
of
the
initial
compliance
period
described
in
§
63.3570
is
the
end
of
a
compliance
period
consisting
of
that
month
and
the
preceding
11
months.
(
b)
You
must
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
with
each
operating
limit
required
by
§
63.3492
that
applies
to
you,
as
specified
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart.
If
an
operating
parameter
is
out
of
the
allowed
range
specified
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart,
this
is
a
deviation
from
the
operating
limit
that
must
be
reported
as
specified
in
§
§
63.3510(
b)(
6)
and
63.3520(
a)(
7).
(
c)
You
must
meet
the
requirements
for
bypass
lines
in
§
63.3578(
b)
for
controlled
coating
operations
for
which
you
do
not
conduct
liquid­
liquid
material
balances.
If
any
bypass
line
is
opened
and
emissions
are
diverted
to
the
atmosphere
when
the
coating
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00044
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2153
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
operation
is
running,
this
is
a
deviation
that
must
be
reported
as
specified
in
§
§
63.3510(
b)(
6)
and
63.3520(
a)(
7).
(
d)
You
must
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
with
the
work
practice
standards
in
§
63.3493.
If
you
did
not
develop
a
work
practice
plan
or
you
did
not
implement
the
plan
or
you
did
not
keep
the
records
required
by
§
63.3530(
k)(
8),
this
is
a
deviation
from
the
work
practice
standards
that
must
be
reported
as
specified
in
§
§
63.3510(
b)(
6)
and
63.3520(
a)(
7).
(
e)
As
part
of
each
semiannual
compliance
report
required
in
§
63.3520,
you
must
identify
the
coating
operation(
s)
for
which
you
used
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option.
If
there
were
no
deviations
from
the
operating
limits
or
work
practice
standards,
submit
a
statement
that
you
were
in
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations
during
the
reporting
period
because
the
organic
HAP
emission
rate
for
each
compliance
period
was
less
than
20
ppmvd
or
was
reduced
by
the
amount
specified
in
§
63.3490
and
you
achieved
the
work
practice
standards
required
by
§
63.3493
during
each
compliance
period.
(
f)
During
periods
of
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunctions
of
the
emission
capture
system,
add­
on
control
device,
or
coating
operation
that
may
affect
emission
capture
or
control
device
efficiency,
you
must
operate
in
accordance
with
the
SSMP
required
by
§
63.3500(
c).
(
g)
Consistent
with
§
§
63.6(
e)
and
63.7(
e)(
1),
deviations
that
occur
during
a
period
of
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
of
the
emission
capture
system,
add­
on
control
device,
or
coating
operation
that
may
affect
emission
capture
or
control
device
efficiency
are
not
violations
if
you
demonstrate
to
the
Administrator's
satisfaction
that
you
were
operating
in
accordance
with
the
SSMP.
The
Administrator
will
determine
whether
deviations
that
occur
during
a
period
you
identify
as
a
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
are
violations,
according
to
the
provisions
in
§
63.6(
e).
(
h)
You
must
maintain
records
applicable
to
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option
as
specified
in
§
§
63.3530
and
63.3531.

§
63.3574
What
are
the
general
requirements
for
performance
tests?

(
a)
You
must
conduct
each
performance
test
required
by
§
63.3570
according
to
the
requirements
of
§
63.7(
e)(
1)
and
under
the
conditions
in
this
section
unless
you
obtain
a
waiver
of
the
performance
test
according
to
the
provisions
in
§
63.7(
h).
(
1)
Representative
coating
operating
conditions.
You
must
conduct
the
performance
test
under
representative
operating
conditions
for
the
coating
operation(
s).
Operations
during
periods
of
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
and
during
periods
of
nonoperation
do
not
constitute
representative
conditions.
You
must
record
the
process
information
that
is
necessary
to
document
operating
conditions
during
the
test
and
explain
why
the
conditions
represent
normal
operation.
(
2)
Representative
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
operating
conditions.
You
must
conduct
the
performance
test
when
the
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
are
operating
at
a
representative
flow
rate
and
the
add­
on
control
device
is
operating
at
a
representative
inlet
concentration.
You
must
record
information
that
is
necessary
to
document
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
operating
conditions
during
the
test
and
explain
why
the
conditions
represent
normal
operation.
(
b)
You
must
conduct
each
performance
test
of
an
emission
capture
system
according
to
the
requirements
in
§
63.3575.
You
must
conduct
each
performance
test
of
an
add­
on
control
device
according
to
the
requirements
in
§
63.3576.

§
63.3575
How
do
I
determine
the
emission
capture
system
efficiency?

The
capture
efficiency
of
your
emission
capture
system
must
be
100
percent
to
use
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option.
You
may
assume
the
capture
system
efficiency
is
100
percent
if
both
of
the
conditions
in
paragraphs
(
a)
and
(
b)
of
this
section
are
met.
(
a)
The
capture
system
meets
the
criteria
in
Method
204
of
appendix
M
to
40
CFR
part
51
for
a
PTE
and
directs
all
the
exhaust
gases
from
the
enclosure
to
an
add­
on
control
device.
(
b)
All
coatings
and
thinners
used
in
the
coating
operation
are
applied
within
the
capture
system,
and
coating
solvent
flash­
off,
curing,
and
drying
occurs
within
the
capture
system.
This
criterion
is
not
met
if
parts
enter
the
open
shop
environment
when
being
moved
between
a
spray
booth
and
a
curing
oven.

§
63.3576
How
do
I
determine
the
add­
on
control
device
emission
destruction
or
removal
efficiency?

You
must
use
the
procedures
and
test
methods
in
this
section
to
determine
the
add­
on
control
device
emission
destruction
or
removal
efficiency
as
part
of
the
performance
test
required
by
§
63.3570.
You
must
conduct
three
test
runs
as
specified
in
§
63.7(
e)(
3)
and
each
test
run
must
last
at
least
1
hour.
(
a)
For
all
types
of
add­
on
control
devices,
use
the
test
methods
specified
in
paragraphs
(
a)(
1)
through
(
5)
of
this
section.
(
1)
Use
Method
1
or
1A
of
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60,
as
appropriate,
to
select
sampling
sites
and
velocity
traverse
points.
(
2)
Use
Method
2,2A,
2C,
2D,
2F,
or
2G
of
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60,
as
appropriate,
to
measure
gas
volumetric
flow
rate.
(
3)
Use
Method
3,
3A,
or
3B
of
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60,
as
appropriate,
for
gas
analysis
to
determine
dry
molecular
weight.
You
may
also
use
as
an
alternative
to
Method
3B,
the
manual
method
for
measuring
the
oxygen,
carbon
dioxide,
and
carbon
monoxide
content
of
exhaust
gas
in
ANSI/
ASME
PTC
19.10
 
1981,
``
Flue
and
Exhaust
Gas
Analyses.''
(
4)
Use
Method
4
of
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60
to
determine
stack
gas
moisture.
(
5)
Methods
for
determining
gas
volumetric
flow
rate,
dry
molecular
weight,
and
stack
gas
moisture
must
be
performed,
as
applicable,
during
each
test
run.
(
b)
Measure
total
gaseous
organic
mass
emissions
as
carbon
at
the
inlet
and
outlet
of
the
add­
on
control
device
simultaneously,
using
either
Method
25
or
25A
of
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60
as
specified
in
paragraphs
(
b)(
1)
through
(
3)
of
this
section.
You
must
use
the
same
method
for
both
the
inlet
and
outlet
measurements.
(
1)
Use
Method
25
of
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60
if
the
add­
on
control
device
is
an
oxidizer
and
you
expect
the
total
gaseous
organic
concentration
as
carbon
to
be
more
than
50
ppm
at
the
control
device
outlet.
(
2)
Use
Method
25A
of
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60
if
the
add­
on
control
device
is
an
oxidizer
and
you
expect
the
total
gaseous
organic
concentration
as
carbon
to
be
50
ppm
or
less
at
the
control
device
outlet.
(
3)
Use
Method
25A
of
appendix
A
to
40
CFR
part
60
if
the
add­
on
control
device
is
not
an
oxidizer.
(
c)
If
two
or
more
add­
on
control
devices
are
used
for
the
same
emission
stream,
then
you
must
measure
emissions
at
the
outlet
of
each
device.
For
example,
if
one
add­
on
control
device
is
a
concentrator
with
an
outlet
for
the
high­
volume
dilute
stream
that
has
been
treated
by
the
concentrator
and
a
second
add­
on
control
device
is
an
oxidizer
with
an
outlet
for
the
lowvolume
concentrated
stream
that
is
treated
with
the
oxidizer,
you
must
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00045
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2154
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
measure
emissions
at
the
outlet
of
the
oxidizer
and
the
high­
volume
dilute
stream
outlet
of
the
concentrator.
(
d)
For
each
test
run,
determine
the
total
gaseous
organic
emissions
mass
flow
rates
for
the
inlet
and
outlet
of
the
add­
on
control
device,
using
Equation
1
of
this
section.
If
there
is
more
than
one
inlet
or
outlet
to
the
add­
on
control
device,
you
must
calculate
the
total
gaseous
organic
mass
flow
rate
using
Equation
1
of
this
section
for
each
inlet
and
each
outlet
and
then
total
all
of
the
inlet
emissions
and
total
all
of
the
outlet
emissions.

M
Q
C
(
Eq.
1)
f
sd
c
=
(
)(
)(
)
 
12
0
0416
10
6
.

Where:
Mf
=
total
gaseous
organic
emissions
mass
flow
rate,
kg/
h.
Cc
=
the
concentration
of
organic
compounds
as
carbon
in
the
vent
gas,
as
determined
by
Method
25
or
Method
25A,
ppmvd.
Qsd
=
volumetric
flow
rate
of
gases
entering
or
exiting
the
add­
on
control
device,
as
determined
by
Method
2,
2A,
2C,
2D,
2F,
or
2G,
dry
standard
cubic
meters/
hour
(
dscm/
h).
0.0416
=
conversion
factor
for
molar
volume,
kg­
moles
per
cubic
meter
(
mol/
m
3)
(@
293
Kelvin
(
K)
and
760
millimeters
of
mercury
(
mmHg)).
(
e)
For
each
test
run,
determine
the
add­
on
control
device
organic
emissions
destruction
or
removal
efficiency,
using
Equation
2
of
this
section.

DRE
=
100
M
M
M
(
Eq.
2)
fi
fo
fi
×
 

Where:
DRE
=
organic
emissions
destruction
or
removal
efficiency
of
the
add­
on
control
device,
percent.
Mfi
=
total
gaseous
organic
emissions
mass
flow
rate
at
the
inlet(
s)
to
the
add­
on
control
device,
using
Equation
1
of
this
section,
kg/
h.
Mfo
=
total
gaseous
organic
emissions
mass
flow
rate
at
the
outlet(
s)
of
the
add­
on
control
device,
using
Equation
1
of
this
section,
kg/
h.
(
f)
Determine
the
emission
destruction
or
removal
efficiency
of
the
add­
on
control
device
as
the
average
of
the
efficiencies
determined
in
the
three
test
runs
and
calculated
in
Equation
2
of
this
section.

§
63.3577
How
do
I
establish
the
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
operating
limits
during
the
performance
test?

During
the
performance
test
required
by
§
63.3570
and
described
in
§
§
63.3574,
63.3575,
and
63.3576,
you
must
establish
the
operating
limits
required
by
§
63.3492
according
to
this
section
unless
you
have
received
approval
for
alternative
monitoring
and
operating
limits
under
§
63.8(
f)
as
specified
in
§
63.3492.
(
a)
Thermal
oxidizers.
If
your
add­
on
control
device
is
a
thermal
oxidizer,
establish
the
operating
limits
according
to
paragraphs
(
a)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section.
(
1)
During
the
performance
test,
you
must
monitor
and
record
the
combustion
temperature
at
least
once
every
15
minutes
during
each
of
the
three
test
runs.
You
must
monitor
the
temperature
in
the
firebox
of
the
thermal
oxidizer
or
immediately
downstream
of
the
firebox
before
any
substantial
heat
exchange
occurs.
(
2)
Use
the
data
collected
during
the
performance
test
to
calculate
and
record
the
average
combustion
temperature
maintained
during
the
performance
test.
That
average
combustion
temperature
is
the
minimum
operating
limit
for
your
thermal
oxidizer.
(
b)
Catalytic
oxidizers.
If
your
add­
on
control
device
is
a
catalytic
oxidizer,
establish
the
operating
limits
according
to
either
paragraphs
(
b)(
1)
and
(
2)
or
paragraphs
(
b)(
3)
and
(
4)
of
this
section.
(
1)
During
the
performance
test,
you
must
monitor
and
record
the
temperature
just
before
the
catalyst
bed
and
the
temperature
difference
across
the
catalyst
bed
at
least
once
every
15
minutes
during
each
of
the
three
test
runs.
(
2)
Use
the
data
collected
during
the
performance
test
to
calculate
and
record
the
average
temperature
just
before
the
catalyst
bed
and
the
average
temperature
difference
across
the
catalyst
bed
maintained
during
the
performance
test.
Those
are
the
minimum
operating
limits
for
your
catalytic
oxidizer.
(
3)
As
an
alternative
to
monitoring
the
temperature
difference
across
the
catalyst
bed,
you
may
monitor
the
temperature
at
the
inlet
to
the
catalyst
bed
and
implement
a
site­
specific
inspection
and
maintenance
plan
for
your
catalytic
oxidizer
as
specified
in
paragraph
(
b)(
4)
of
this
section.
During
the
performance
test,
you
must
monitor
and
record
the
temperature
just
before
the
catalyst
bed
at
least
once
every
15
minutes
during
each
of
the
three
test
runs.
Use
the
data
collected
during
the
performance
test
to
calculate
and
record
the
average
temperature
just
before
the
catalyst
bed
during
the
performance
test.
This
is
the
minimum
operating
limit
for
your
catalytic
oxidizer.
(
4)
You
must
develop
and
implement
an
inspection
and
maintenance
plan
for
your
catalytic
oxidizer(
s)
for
which
you
elect
to
monitor
according
to
paragraph
(
b)(
3)
of
this
section.
The
plan
must
address,
at
a
minimum,
the
elements
specified
in
paragraphs
(
b)(
4)(
i)
through
(
iii)
of
this
section.
(
i)
Annual
sampling
and
analysis
of
the
catalyst
activity
(
i.
e,
conversion
efficiency)
following
the
manufacturer's
or
catalyst
supplier's
recommended
procedures.
(
ii)
Monthly
inspection
of
the
oxidizer
system,
including
the
burner
assembly
and
fuel
supply
lines
for
problems
and,
as
necessary,
adjust
the
equipment
to
assure
proper
air­
to­
fuel
mixtures.
(
iii)
Annual
internal
and
monthly
external
visual
inspection
of
the
catalyst
bed
to
check
for
channeling,
abrasion,
and
settling.
If
problems
are
found,
you
must
take
corrective
action
consistent
with
the
manufacturer's
recommendations
and
conduct
a
new
performance
test
to
determine
destruction
efficiency
according
to
§
63.3576.
(
c)
Carbon
adsorbers.
If
your
add­
on
control
device
is
a
carbon
adsorber,
establish
the
operating
limits
according
to
paragraphs
(
c)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section.
(
1)
You
must
monitor
and
record
the
total
regeneration
desorbing
gas
(
e.
g.,
steam
or
nitrogen)
mass
flow
for
each
regeneration
cycle,
and
the
carbon
bed
temperature
after
each
carbon
bed
regeneration
and
cooling
cycle
for
the
regeneration
cycle
either
immediately
preceding
or
immediately
following
the
performance
test.
(
2)
The
operating
limits
for
your
carbon
adsorber
are
the
minimum
total
desorbing
gas
mass
flow
recorded
during
the
regeneration
cycle
and
the
maximum
carbon
bed
temperature
recorded
after
the
cooling
cycle.
(
d)
Condensers.
If
your
add­
on
control
device
is
a
condenser,
establish
the
operating
limits
according
to
paragraphs
(
d)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section.
(
1)
During
the
performance
test,
you
must
monitor
and
record
the
condenser
outlet
(
product
side)
gas
temperature
at
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00046
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
EP15JA03.021</
MATH>
EP15JA03.022</
MATH>
2155
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
least
once
every
15
minutes
during
each
of
the
three
test
runs.
(
2)
Use
the
data
collected
during
the
performance
test
to
calculate
and
record
the
average
condenser
outlet
(
product
side)
gas
temperature
maintained
during
the
performance
test.
This
average
condenser
outlet
gas
temperature
is
the
maximum
operating
limit
for
your
condenser.
(
e)
Concentrators.
If
your
add­
on
control
device
includes
a
concentrator,
you
must
establish
operating
limits
for
the
concentrator
according
to
paragraphs
(
e)(
1)
through
(
4)
of
this
section.
(
1)
During
the
performance
test,
you
must
monitor
and
record
the
desorption
concentrate
stream
gas
temperature
at
least
once
every
15
minutes
during
each
of
the
three
runs
of
the
performance
test.
(
2)
Use
the
data
collected
during
the
performance
test
to
calculate
and
record
the
average
temperature.
This
is
the
minimum
operating
limit
for
the
desorption
concentrate
gas
stream
temperature.
(
3)
During
the
performance
test,
you
must
monitor
and
record
the
pressure
drop
of
the
dilute
stream
across
the
concentrator
at
least
once
every
15
minutes
during
each
of
the
three
runs
of
the
performance
test.
(
4)
Use
the
data
collected
during
the
performance
test
to
calculate
and
record
the
average
pressure
drop.
This
is
the
maximum
operating
limit
for
the
dilute
stream
across
the
concentrator.
(
f)
Emission
capture
systems.
For
each
capture
device
that
is
part
of
a
PTE
that
meets
the
criteria
of
§
63.3575,
the
operating
limit
for
a
PTE
is
specified
in
Table
4
to
this
subpart.

§
63.3578
What
are
the
requirements
for
continuous
parameter
monitoring
system
installation,
operation,
and
maintenance?

(
a)
General.
You
must
install,
operate,
and
maintain
each
CPMS
specified
in
paragraphs
(
c),
(
e),
(
f),
and
(
g)
of
this
section
according
to
paragraphs
(
a)(
1)
through
(
6)
of
this
section.
You
must
install,
operate,
and
maintain
each
CPMS
specified
in
paragraphs
(
b)
and
(
d)
of
this
section
according
to
paragraphs
(
a)(
3)
through
(
5)
of
this
section.
(
1)
The
CPMS
must
complete
a
minimum
of
one
cycle
of
operation
for
each
successive
15­
minute
period.
You
must
have
a
minimum
of
four
equally
spaced
successive
cycles
of
CPMS
operation
in
1
hour.
(
2)
You
must
determine
the
average
of
all
recorded
readings
for
each
successive
3­
hour
period
of
the
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
operation.
(
3)
You
must
record
the
results
of
each
inspection,
calibration,
and
validation
check
of
the
CPMS.
(
4)
You
must
maintain
the
CPMS
at
all
times
and
have
available
necessary
parts
for
routine
repairs
of
the
monitoring
equipment.
(
5)
You
must
operate
the
CPMS
and
collect
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
parameter
data
at
all
times
that
a
controlled
coating
operation
is
operating,
except
during
monitoring
malfunctions,
associated
repairs,
and
required
quality
assurance
or
control
activities
(
including,
if
applicable,
calibration
checks
and
required
zero
and
span
adjustments).
(
6)
You
must
not
use
emission
capture
system
or
add­
on
control
device
parameter
data
recorded
during
monitoring
malfunctions,
associated
repairs,
out
of
control
periods,
or
required
quality
assurance
or
control
activities
when
calculating
data
averages.
You
must
use
all
the
data
collected
during
all
other
periods
in
calculating
the
data
averages
for
determining
compliance
with
the
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
operating
limits.
(
7)
A
monitoring
malfunction
is
any
sudden,
infrequent,
not
reasonably
preventable
failure
of
the
CPMS
to
provide
valid
data.
Monitoring
failures
that
are
caused
in
part
by
poor
maintenance
or
careless
operation
are
not
malfunctions.
Any
period
for
which
the
monitoring
system
is
out
of
control
and
data
are
not
available
for
required
calculations
is
a
deviation
from
the
monitoring
requirements.
(
b)
Capture
system
bypass
line.
You
must
meet
the
requirements
of
paragraphs
(
b)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section
for
each
emission
capture
system
that
contains
bypass
lines
that
could
divert
emissions
away
from
the
add­
on
control
device
to
the
atmosphere.
(
1)
You
must
monitor
or
secure
the
valve
or
closure
mechanism
controlling
the
bypass
line
in
a
nondiverting
position
in
such
a
way
that
the
valve
or
closure
mechanism
cannot
be
opened
without
creating
a
record
that
the
valve
was
opened.
The
method
used
to
monitor
or
secure
the
valve
or
closure
mechanism
must
meet
one
of
the
requirements
specified
in
paragraphs
(
b)(
1)(
i)
through
(
iv)
of
this
section.
(
i)
Flow
control
position
indicator.
Install,
calibrate,
maintain,
and
operate
according
to
the
manufacturer's
specifications
a
flow
control
position
indicator
that
takes
a
reading
at
least
once
every
15
minutes
and
provides
a
record
indicating
whether
the
emissions
are
directed
to
the
add­
on
control
device
or
diverted
from
the
add­
on
control
device.
The
time
of
occurrence
and
flow
control
position
must
be
recorded
as
well
as
every
time
the
flow
direction
is
changed.
The
flow
control
position
indicator
must
be
installed
at
the
entrance
to
any
bypass
line
that
could
divert
the
emissions
away
from
the
addon
control
device
to
the
atmosphere.
(
ii)
Car­
seal
or
lock­
and­
key
valve
closures.
Secure
any
bypass
line
valve
in
the
closed
position
with
a
car­
seal
or
a
lock­
and­
key
type
configuration.
You
must
visually
inspect
the
seal
or
closure
mechanism
at
least
once
every
month
to
ensure
that
the
valve
is
maintained
in
the
closed
position
and
the
emissions
are
not
diverted
away
from
the
add­
on
control
device
to
the
atmosphere.
(
iii)
Valve
closure
monitoring.
Ensure
that
any
bypass
line
valve
is
in
the
closed
(
non­
diverting)
position
through
monitoring
of
valve
position
at
least
once
every
15
minutes.
You
must
inspect
the
monitoring
system
at
least
once
every
month
to
verify
that
the
monitor
will
indicate
valve
position.
(
iv)
Automatic
shutdown
system.
Use
an
automatic
shutdown
system
in
which
the
coating
operation
is
stopped
when
flow
is
diverted
by
the
bypass
line
away
from
the
add­
on
control
device
to
the
atmosphere
when
the
coating
operation
is
running.
You
must
inspect
the
automatic
shutdown
system
at
least
once
every
month
to
verify
that
it
will
detect
diversions
of
flow
and
shut
down
the
coating
operation.
(
2)
If
any
bypass
line
is
opened,
you
must
include
a
description
of
why
the
bypass
line
was
opened
and
the
length
of
time
it
remained
open
in
the
semiannual
compliance
reports
required
in
§
63.3520.
(
c)
Thermal
oxidizers
and
catalytic
oxidizers.
If
you
are
using
a
thermal
oxidizer
or
catalytic
oxidizer
as
an
addon
control
device
(
including
those
used
with
concentrators
or
with
carbon
adsorbers
to
treat
desorbed
concentrate
streams),
you
must
comply
with
the
requirements
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
1)
through
(
3)
of
this
section.
(
1)
For
a
thermal
oxidizer,
install
a
gas
temperature
monitor
in
the
firebox
of
the
thermal
oxidizer
or
in
the
duct
immediately
downstream
of
the
firebox
before
any
substantial
heat
exchange
occurs.
(
2)
For
a
catalytic
oxidizer,
install
a
gas
temperature
monitor
in
the
gas
stream
immediately
before
the
catalyst
bed
and
if
you
establish
operating
limits
according
to
§
63.3577(
b)(
1)
and
(
2),
also
install
a
gas
temperature
monitor
in
the
gas
stream
immediately
after
the
catalyst
bed.
(
i)
If
you
establish
operating
limits
according
to
§
63.3577(
b)(
1)
and
(
2),
then
you
must
install
the
gas
temperature
monitors
both
upstream
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00047
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2156
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
and
downstream
of
the
catalyst
bed.
The
temperature
monitors
must
be
in
the
gas
stream
immediately
before
and
after
the
catalyst
bed
to
measure
the
temperature
difference
across
the
bed.
(
ii)
If
you
establish
operating
limits
according
to
§
63.3577(
b)(
3)
and
(
4),
then
you
must
install
a
gas
temperature
monitor
upstream
of
the
catalyst
bed.
The
temperature
monitor
must
be
in
the
gas
stream
immediately
before
the
catalyst
bed
to
measure
the
temperature.
(
3)
For
all
thermal
oxidizers
and
catalytic
oxidizers,
you
must
meet
the
requirements
in
paragraphs
(
a)
and
(
c)(
3)(
i)
through
(
vii)
of
this
section
for
each
gas
temperature
monitoring
device.
(
i)
Locate
the
temperature
sensor
in
a
position
that
provides
a
representative
temperature.
(
ii)
Use
a
temperature
sensor
with
a
measurement
sensitivity
of
4
degrees
Fahrenheit
or
0.75
percent
of
the
temperature
value,
whichever
is
larger.
(
iii)
Shield
the
temperature
sensor
system
from
electromagnetic
interference
and
chemical
contaminants.
(
iv)
If
a
gas
temperature
chart
recorder
is
used,
it
must
have
a
measurement
sensitivity
in
the
minor
division
of
at
least
20
degrees
Fahrenheit.
(
v)
Perform
an
electronic
calibration
at
least
semiannually
according
to
the
procedures
in
the
manufacturer's
owners
manual.
Following
the
electronic
calibration,
you
must
conduct
a
temperature
sensor
validation
check
in
which
a
second
or
redundant
temperature
sensor
placed
nearby
the
process
temperature
sensor
must
yield
a
reading
within
30
degrees
Fahrenheit
of
the
process
temperature
sensor
reading.
(
vi)
Conduct
calibration
and
validation
checks
any
time
the
sensor
exceeds
the
manufacturer's
specified
maximum
operating
temperature
range
or
install
a
new
temperature
sensor.
(
vii)
At
least
monthly,
inspect
components
for
integrity
and
electrical
connections
for
continuity,
oxidation,
and
galvanic
corrosion.
(
d)
Carbon
adsorbers.
If
you
are
using
a
carbon
adsorber
as
an
add­
on
control
device,
you
must
monitor
the
total
regeneration
desorbing
gas
(
e.
g.,
steam
or
nitrogen)
mass
flow
for
each
regeneration
cycle,
the
carbon
bed
temperature
after
each
regeneration
and
cooling
cycle,
and
comply
with
paragraphs
(
a)(
3)
through
(
5)
and
(
d)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section.
(
1)
The
regeneration
desorbing
gas
mass
flow
monitor
must
be
an
integrating
device
having
a
measurement
sensitivity
of
plus
or
minus
10
percent
capable
of
recording
the
total
regeneration
desorbing
gas
mass
flow
for
each
regeneration
cycle.
(
2)
The
carbon
bed
temperature
monitor
must
have
a
measurement
sensitivity
of
1
percent
of
the
temperature
recorded
or
1
degree
Fahrenheit,
whichever
is
greater,
and
must
be
capable
of
recording
the
temperature
within
15
minutes
of
completing
any
carbon
bed
cooling
cycle.
(
e)
Condensers.
If
you
are
using
a
condenser,
you
must
monitor
the
condenser
outlet
(
product
side)
gas
temperature
and
comply
with
paragraphs
(
a)
and
(
e)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section.
(
1)
The
gas
temperature
monitor
must
have
a
measurement
sensitivity
of
1
percent
of
the
temperature
recorded
or
1
degree
Fahrenheit,
whichever
is
greater.
(
2)
The
temperature
monitor
must
provide
a
gas
temperature
record
at
least
once
every
15
minutes.
(
f)
Concentrators.
If
you
are
using
a
concentrator
such
as
a
zeolite
wheel
or
rotary
carbon
bed
concentrator,
you
must
comply
with
the
requirements
in
paragraphs
(
f)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section.
(
1)
You
must
install
a
temperature
monitor
in
the
desorption
gas
stream.
The
temperature
monitor
must
meet
the
requirements
in
paragraphs
(
a)
and
(
c)(
3)
of
this
section.
(
2)
You
must
install
a
device
to
monitor
pressure
drop
across
the
zeolite
wheel
or
rotary
carbon
bed.
The
pressure
monitoring
device
must
meet
the
requirements
in
paragraphs
(
a)
and
(
f)(
2)(
i)
through
(
vii)
of
this
section.
(
i)
Locate
the
pressure
sensor(
s)
in
or
as
close
to
a
position
that
provides
a
representative
measurement
of
the
pressure.
(
ii)
Minimize
or
eliminate
pulsating
pressure,
vibration,
and
internal
and
external
corrosion.
(
iii)
Use
a
gauge
with
a
minimum
tolerance
of
0.5
inch
of
water
or
a
transducer
with
a
minimum
tolerance
of
1
percent
of
the
pressure
range.
(
iv)
Check
the
pressure
tap
daily.
(
v)
Using
a
manometer,
check
gauge
calibration
quarterly
and
transducer
calibration
monthly.
(
vi)
Conduct
calibration
checks
any
time
the
sensor
exceeds
the
manufacturer's
specified
maximum
operating
pressure
range
or
install
a
new
pressure
sensor.
(
vii)
At
least
monthly,
inspect
components
for
integrity,
electrical
connections
for
continuity,
and
mechanical
connections
for
leakage.
(
g)
Emission
capture
systems.
The
capture
system
monitoring
system
must
comply
with
the
applicable
requirements
in
paragraphs
(
g)(
1)
and
(
2)
of
this
section.
(
1)
For
each
flow
measurement
device,
you
must
meet
the
requirements
in
paragraphs
(
a)
and
(
g)(
1)(
i)
through
(
iv)
of
this
section.
(
i)
Locate
a
flow
sensor
in
a
position
that
provides
a
representative
flow
measurement
in
the
duct
from
each
capture
device
in
the
emission
capture
system
to
the
add­
on
control
device.
(
ii)
Reduce
swirling
flow
or
abnormal
velocity
distributions
due
to
upstream
and
downstream
disturbances.
(
iii)
Conduct
a
flow
sensor
calibration
check
at
least
semiannually.
(
iv)
At
least
monthly,
inspect
components
for
integrity,
electrical
connections
for
continuity,
and
mechanical
connections
for
leakage.
(
2)
For
each
pressure
drop
measurement
device,
you
must
comply
with
the
requirements
in
paragraphs
(
a)
and
(
g)(
2)(
i)
through
(
vi)
of
this
section.
(
i)
Locate
the
pressure
sensor(
s)
in
or
as
close
to
a
position
that
provides
a
representative
measurement
of
the
pressure
drop
across
each
opening
you
are
monitoring.
(
ii)
Minimize
or
eliminate
pulsating
pressure,
vibration,
and
internal
and
external
corrosion.
(
iii)
Check
pressure
tap
pluggage
daily.
(
iv)
Using
an
inclined
manometer
with
a
measurement
sensitivity
of
0.0002
inch
water,
check
gauge
calibration
quarterly
and
transducer
calibration
monthly.
(
v)
Conduct
calibration
checks
any
time
the
sensor
exceeds
the
manufacturer's
specified
maximum
operating
pressure
range
or
install
a
new
pressure
sensor.
(
vi)
At
least
monthly,
inspect
components
for
integrity,
electrical
connections
for
continuity,
and
mechanical
connections
for
leakage.

Other
Requirements
and
Information
§
63.3580
Who
implements
and
enforces
this
subpart?

(
a)
This
subpart
can
be
implemented
and
enforced
by
us,
the
EPA,
or
a
delegated
authority
such
as
your
State,
local,
or
tribal
agency.
If
the
Administrator
has
delegated
authority
to
your
State,
local,
or
tribal
agency,
then
that
agency,
in
addition
to
the
EPA,
has
the
authority
to
implement
and
enforce
this
subpart.
You
should
contact
your
EPA
Regional
Office
to
find
out
if
implementation
and
enforcement
of
this
subpart
is
delegated
to
your
State,
local,
or
tribal
agency.
(
b)
In
delegating
implementation
and
enforcement
authority
of
this
subpart
to
a
State,
local,
or
tribal
agency
under
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
E,
the
authorities
contained
in
paragraph
(
c)
of
this
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00048
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2157
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
section
are
retained
by
the
EPA
Administrator
and
are
not
transferred
to
the
State,
local,
or
tribal
agency.
(
c)
The
authorities
that
will
not
be
delegated
to
State,
local,
or
tribal
agencies
are
listed
in
paragraphs
(
c)(
1)
through
(
4)
of
this
section.
(
1)
Approval
of
alternatives
to
the
work
practice
standards
in
§
63.3493.
(
2)
Approval
of
major
alternatives
to
test
methods
under
§
63.7(
e)(
2)(
ii)
and
(
f)
and
as
defined
in
§
63.90.
(
3)
Approval
of
major
alternatives
to
monitoring
under
§
63.8(
f)
and
as
defined
in
§
63.90.
(
4)
Approval
of
major
alternatives
to
recordkeeping
and
reporting
under
§
63.10(
f)
and
as
defined
in
§
63.90.

§
63.3581
What
definitions
apply
to
this
subpart?

Terms
used
in
this
subpart
are
defined
in
the
CAA,
in
40
CFR
63.2,
the
General
Provisions
of
this
part,
and
in
this
section
as
follows:
Add­
on
control
means
an
air
pollution
control
device,
such
as
a
thermal
oxidizer
or
carbon
adsorber,
that
reduces
pollution
in
an
air
stream
by
destruction
or
removal
before
discharge
to
the
atmosphere.
Adhesive
means
any
chemical
substance
that
is
applied
for
the
purpose
of
bonding
two
surfaces
together.
Aerosol
can
means
any
can
into
which
a
pressurized
aerosol
product
is
packaged.
Aseptic
coating
means
any
coating
that
must
withstand
high
temperature
steam,
chemicals,
or
a
combination
of
both
used
to
sterilize
food
cans
prior
to
filling.
Can
body
means
a
formed
metal
can,
excluding
the
unattached
end(
s).
Can
end
means
a
can
part
manufactured
from
metal
substrate
equal
to
or
thinner
than
0.3785
millimeters
(
mm)
(
0.0149
inch)
for
the
purpose
of
sealing
the
ends
of
can
bodies
including
non­
metal
or
composite
can
bodies.
Capture
device
means
a
hood,
enclosure,
room,
floor
sweep,
or
other
means
of
containing
or
collecting
emissions
and
directing
those
emissions
into
an
add­
on
air
pollution
control
device.
Capture
efficiency
or
capture
system
efficiency
means
the
portion
(
expressed
as
a
percentage)
of
the
pollutants
from
an
emission
source
that
is
delivered
to
an
add­
on
control
device.
Capture
system
means
one
or
more
capture
devices
intended
to
collect
emissions
generated
by
a
coating
operation
in
the
use
of
coatings
or
cleaning
materials,
both
at
the
point
of
application
and
at
subsequent
points
where
emissions
from
the
coatings
or
cleaning
materials
occur,
such
as
flashoff,
drying,
or
curing.
As
used
in
this
subpart,
multiple
capture
devices
that
collect
emissions
generated
by
a
coating
operation
are
considered
a
single
capture
system.
Cleaning
material
means
a
solvent
used
to
remove
contaminants
and
other
materials
such
as
dirt,
grease,
oil,
and
dried
or
wet
coating
(
e.
g.,
depainting)
from
a
substrate
before
or
after
coating
application
or
from
equipment
associated
with
a
coating
operation,
such
as
spray
booths,
spray
guns,
racks,
tanks,
and
hangers.
Thus,
it
includes
any
cleaning
material
used
on
substrates
or
equipment
or
both.
Coating
means
a
material
applied
to
a
substrate
for
decorative,
protective,
or
functional
purposes.
Such
materials
include,
but
are
not
limited
to,
paints,
sealants,
caulks,
inks,
adhesives,
and
maskants.
Decorative,
protective,
or
functional
materials
that
consist
only
of
protective
oils
for
metal,
acids,
bases,
or
any
combination
of
these
substances
are
not
considered
coatings
for
the
purposes
of
this
subpart.
Coating
operation
means
equipment
used
to
apply
coating
to
a
metal
can
or
end
(
including
decorative
tins),
or
metal
crown
or
closure,
and
to
dry
or
cure
the
coating
after
application.
A
coating
operation
always
includes
at
least
the
point
at
which
a
coating
is
applied
and
all
subsequent
points
in
the
affected
source
where
organic
HAP
emissions
from
that
coating
occur.
There
may
be
multiple
coating
operations
in
an
affected
source.
Coating
application
with
hand­
held
nonrefillable
aerosol
containers,
touchup
markers,
or
marking
pens
is
not
a
coating
operation
for
the
purposes
of
this
subpart.
Coating
solids
means
the
nonvolatile
portion
of
a
coating
that
makes
up
the
dry
film.
Continuous
parameter
monitoring
system
(
CPMS)
means
the
total
equipment
that
may
be
required
to
meet
the
data
acquisition
and
availability
requirements
of
this
subpart,
used
to
sample,
condition
(
if
applicable),
analyze,
and
provide
a
record
of
coating
operation,
capture
system,
or
add­
on
control
device
parameters.
Controlled
coating
operation
means
a
coating
operation
from
which
some
or
all
of
the
organic
HAP
emissions
are
routed
through
an
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device.
Crowns
and
closures
means
steel
or
aluminum
coverings
such
as
bottle
caps
and
jar
lids
for
containers
other
than
can
ends.
Decorative
tin
means
a
single­
walled
container,
designed
to
be
covered
or
uncovered
that
is
manufactured
from
metal
substrate
equal
to
or
thinner
than
0.3785
mm
(
0.0149
inch)
and
is
normally
coated
on
the
exterior
surface
with
decorative
coatings.
Decorative
tins
may
contain
foods
but
are
not
hermetically
sealed
and
are
not
subject
to
food
processing
steps
such
as
retort
or
pasteurization.
Interior
coatings
are
not
applied
to
protect
the
metal
and
contents
from
chemical
interaction.
Deviation
means
any
instance
in
which
an
affected
source
subject
to
this
subpart
or
an
owner
or
operator
of
such
a
source:
(
1)
Fails
to
meet
any
requirement
or
obligation
established
by
this
subpart
including
but
not
limited
to
any
emission
limit,
operating
limit,
or
work
practice
standard;
(
2)
Fails
to
meet
any
term
or
condition
that
is
adopted
to
implement
an
applicable
requirement
in
this
subpart
and
that
is
included
in
the
operating
permit
for
any
affected
source
required
to
obtain
such
a
permit;
or
(
3)
Fails
to
meet
any
emission
limit,
operating
limit,
or
work
practice
standard
in
this
subpart
during
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
regardless
of
whether
or
not
such
failure
is
permitted
by
this
subpart.
Drum
means
a
cylindrical
metal
container
with
walls
of
29
gauge
or
thicker
and
a
capacity
greater
than
45.4
liters
(
12
gal).
Emission
limitation
means
an
emission
limit,
operating
limit,
or
work
practice
standard.
Enclosure
means
a
structure
that
surrounds
a
source
of
emissions
and
captures
and
directs
the
emissions
to
an
add­
on
control
device.
End
lining
means
the
application
of
end
seal
compound
on
can
ends
during
end
manufacturing.
End
seal
compound
means
the
coating
applied
onto
ends
of
cans
that
functions
to
seal
the
end(
s)
of
a
can
to
the
can
body.
Exempt
compound
means
a
specific
compound
that
is
not
considered
a
VOC
due
to
negligible
photochemical
reactivity.
The
exempt
compounds
are
listed
in
40
CFR
51.100(
s).
Food
can
means
any
can
manufactured
to
contain
edible
products
and
designed
to
be
hermetically
sealed.
Does
not
include
decorative
tins.
General
line
can
means
any
can
manufactured
to
contain
inedible
products.
Does
not
include
aerosol
cans
or
decorative
tins.
Inside
spray
means
a
coating
sprayed
on
the
interior
of
a
can
body
to
provide
a
protective
film
between
the
can
and
its
contents.
Manufacturer's
formulation
data
means
data
on
a
material
(
such
as
a
coating)
that
are
supplied
by
the
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00049
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4702
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2158
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
material
manufacturer
based
on
knowledge
of
the
ingredients
used
to
manufacture
that
material,
rather
than
based
on
testing
of
the
material
with
the
test
methods
specified
in
§
63.3541.
Manufacturer's
formulation
data
may
include
but
are
not
limited
to
information
on
density,
organic
HAP
content,
volatile
organic
matter
content,
and
coating
solids
content.
Mass
fraction
of
organic
HAP
means
the
ratio
of
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
to
the
mass
of
a
material
in
which
it
is
contained,
expressed
as
kg
of
organic
HAP
per
kg
of
material.
Metal
can
means
a
single­
walled
container
manufactured
from
metal
substrate
equal
to
or
thinner
than
0.3785
mm
(
0.0149
inch).
Month
means
a
calendar
month
or
a
pre­
specified
period
of
28
days
to
35
days
to
allow
for
flexibility
in
recordkeeping
when
data
are
based
on
a
business
accounting
period.
Non­
aseptic
coating
means
any
coating
that
is
not
subjected
to
high
temperature
steam,
chemicals,
or
a
combination
of
both
to
sterilize
food
cans
prior
to
filling.
One
and
two­
piece
draw
and
iron
can
means
a
steel
or
aluminum
can
manufactured
by
the
draw
and
iron
process.
Includes
two­
piece
beverage
cans,
two­
piece
food
cans,
and
onepiece
aerosol
cans.
One­
piece
aerosol
can
means
an
aerosol
can
formed
by
the
draw
and
iron
process
to
which
no
ends
are
attached
and
a
valve
is
placed
directly
on
top.
Organic
HAP
content
means
the
mass
of
organic
HAP
per
volume
of
coating
solids
for
a
coating,
calculated
using
Equation
1
of
§
63.3541.
The
organic
HAP
content
is
determined
for
the
coating
in
the
condition
it
is
in
when
received
from
its
manufacturer
or
supplier
and
does
not
account
for
any
alteration
after
receipt.
Pail
means
a
cylindrical
or
rectangular
metal
container
with
walls
of
29
gauge
or
thicker
and
a
capacity
of
7.6
to
45.4
liters
(
2
to
12
gal)
(
i.
e.,
bucket).
Permanent
total
enclosure
(
PTE)
means
a
permanently
installed
enclosure
that
meets
the
criteria
of
Method
204
of
appendix
M,
40
CFR
part
51,
for
a
PTE
and
that
directs
all
the
exhaust
gases
from
the
enclosure
to
an
add­
on
control
device.
Protective
oil
means
an
organic
material
that
is
applied
to
metal
for
the
purpose
of
providing
lubrication
or
protection
from
corrosion
without
forming
a
solid
film.
This
definition
of
protective
oil
includes,
but
is
not
limited
to,
lubricating
oils,
evaporative
oils
(
including
those
that
evaporate
completely),
and
extrusion
oils.
Research
or
laboratory
facility
means
a
facility
whose
primary
purpose
is
for
research
and
development
of
new
processes
and
products
that
is
conducted
under
the
close
supervision
of
technically
trained
personnel
and
is
not
engaged
in
the
manufacture
of
final
or
intermediate
products
for
commercial
purposes,
except
in
a
de
minimis
manner.
Responsible
official
means
responsible
official
as
defined
in
40
CFR
70.2.
Sheetcoating
means
a
can
manufacturing
coating
process
that
involves
coating
of
flat
metal
sheets
before
they
are
formed
into
cans.
Side
seam
stripe
means
a
coating
applied
to
the
interior
and/
or
exterior
of
the
welded
or
soldered
seam
of
a
threepiece
can
body
to
protect
the
exposed
metal.
Startup,
initial
means
the
first
time
equipment
is
brought
online
in
a
facility.
Surface
preparation
means
use
of
a
cleaning
material
on
a
portion
of
or
all
of
a
substrate.
That
includes
use
of
a
cleaning
material
to
remove
dried
coating
which
is
sometimes
called
``
depainting.''
Temporary
total
enclosure
(
TTE)
means
an
enclosure
constructed
for
the
purpose
of
measuring
the
capture
efficiency
of
pollutants
emitted
from
a
given
source
as
defined
in
Method
204
of
appendix
M,
40
CFR
part
51.
Thinner
means
an
organic
solvent
that
is
added
to
a
coating
after
the
coating
is
received
from
the
supplier.
Three­
piece
aerosol
can
means
a
steel
aerosol
can
formed
by
the
three­
piece
can
assembly
process
manufactured
to
contain
food
or
non­
food
products.
Three­
piece
can
assembly
means
the
process
of
forming
a
flat
metal
sheet
into
a
shaped
can
body
which
may
include
the
processes
of
necking,
flanging,
beading,
and
seaming
and
application
of
a
side
seam
stripe
and/
or
an
inside
spray
coating.
Three­
piece
food
can
means
a
steel
can
formed
by
the
three­
piece
can
assembly
process
manufactured
to
contain
edible
products
and
designed
to
be
hermetically
sealed.
Total
volatile
hydrocarbon
(
TVH)
means
the
total
amount
of
nonaqueous
volatile
organic
matter
determined
according
to
Methods
204
and
204A
through
204F
of
appendix
M
to
40
CFR
part
51
and
substituting
the
term
TVH
each
place
in
the
methods
where
the
term
VOC
is
used.
The
TVH
includes
both
VOC
and
non­
VOC.
Two­
piece
beverage
can
means
a
twopiece
draw
and
iron
can
manufactured
to
contain
drinkable
liquids
such
as
beer,
soft
drinks,
or
fruit
juices.
Two­
piece
food
can
means
a
steel
or
aluminum
can
manufactured
by
the
draw
and
iron
process
and
designed
to
contain
edible
products
other
than
beverages
and
to
be
hermetically
sealed.
Uncontrolled
coating
operation
means
a
coating
operation
from
which
none
of
the
organic
HAP
emissions
are
routed
through
an
emission
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device.
Volatile
organic
compound
(
VOC)
means
any
compound
defined
as
VOC
in
40
CFR
51.100(
s).
Volume
fraction
of
coating
solids
means
the
ratio
of
the
volume
of
coating
solids
(
also
known
as
volume
of
nonvolatiles)
to
the
volume
of
coating;
liters
of
coating
solids
per
liter
of
coating.
Wastewater
means
water
that
is
generated
in
a
coating
operation
and
is
collected,
stored,
or
treated
prior
to
being
discarded
or
discharged.

Tables
to
Subpart
KKKK
of
Part
63
You
must
comply
with
the
emission
limits
that
apply
to
your
affected
source
in
the
following
table
as
required
by
§
63.3490(
a)
through
(
c).

VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00050
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4755
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2159
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
TABLE
1
TO
SUBPART
KKKK
OF
PART
63
 
EMISSION
LIMITS
FOR
NEW
OR
RECONSTRUCTED
AFFECTED
SOURCES
If
you
apply
surface
coatings
to
metal
cans
or
metal
can
parts
in
this
subcategory
.
.
.
then
for
all
coatings
of
this
type
.
.
.
you
must
meet
the
following
organic
HAP
emission
limit
in
kg/
liter
solids
(
lbs
HAP/
gal
solids
a
1.
One
and
two­
piece
draw
and
iron
can
body
coating
.............
a.
Two­
piece
beverage
cans
 
all
coatings
................................
0.04
(
0.31)
b.
Two­
piece
food
cans
 
all
coatings
........................................
0.06
(
0.50)
c.
One­
piece
aerosol
cans
 
all
coatings
....................................
0.08
(
0.65)
2.
Sheetcoating
...........................................................................
Sheetcoating
...............................................................................
0.02
(
0.17)
3.
Three­
piece
can
assembly
.....................................................
a.
Inside
spray
............................................................................
b.
Aseptic
side
seam
stripes
on
food
cans
................................
c.
Non­
aseptic
side
seam
stripes
on
food
cans
.........................
d.
Side
seam
stripes
on
general
line
non­
food
cans
.................
e.
Side
seam
stripes
on
aerosol
cans
........................................
0.12
(
1.03)
1.48
(
12.37)
0.72
(
5.96)
1.18
(
9.84)
1.46
(
12.14)
4.
End
lining
................................................................................
a.
Aseptic
end
seal
compounds
.................................................
b.
Non­
aseptic
end
seal
compounds
..........................................
0.06
(
0.54)
0.00
(
0.00)

a
If
you
apply
surface
coatings
of
more
than
one
type
within
any
one
subcategory
you
may
calculate
an
OSEL
according
to
§
63.3551(
i).

You
must
comply
with
the
emission
limits
that
apply
to
your
affected
source
in
the
following
table
as
required
by
§
63.3490(
a)
through
(
c).

TABLE
2
TO
SUBPART
KKKK
OF
PART
63.
 
EMISSION
LIMITS
FOR
EXISTING
AFFECTED
SOURCES
If
you
apply
surface
coatings
to
metal
cans
or
metal
can
parts
in
this
subcategory
.
.
.
then
for
all
coatings
of
this
type
.
.
.
you
must
meet
the
following
organic
HAP
emission
limit
in
kg
HAP/
liter
solids
(
lbs
HAP/
gal
solids
a
1.
One
and
two­
piece
draw
and
iron
can
body
coating
.............
a.
Two­
piece
beverage
cans
 
all
coatings
................................
0.07
(
0.59)
b.
Two­
piece
food
cans
 
all
coatings
........................................
0.06
(
0.51)
c.
One­
piece
aerosol
cans
 
all
coatings
....................................
0.12
(
0.99)
2.
Sheetcoating
...........................................................................
Sheetcoating
...............................................................................
0.03
(
0.26)
3.
Three­
piece
can
assembly
.....................................................
a.
Inside
spray
............................................................................
0.29
(
2.43)
b.
Aseptic
side
seam
stripes
on
food
cans
................................
1.94
(
16.16)
c.
Non­
aseptic
side
seam
stripes
on
food
cans
.........................
0.79
(
6.57)
d.
Side
seam
stripes
on
general
line
non­
food
cans
.................
1.18
(
9.84)
e.
Side
seam
stripes
on
aerosol
cans
........................................
1.46
(
12.14)
4.
End
lining
................................................................................
a.
Aseptic
end
seal
compounds
.................................................
0.06
(
0.54)
b.
Non­
aseptic
end
seal
compounds
..........................................
0.00
(
0.00)

a
If
you
apply
surface
coatings
of
more
than
one
type
within
any
one
subcategory
you
may
calculate
an
OSEL
according
to
§
63.3551(
i).

You
must
comply
with
the
emission
limits
that
apply
to
your
affected
source
in
the
following
table
as
required
by
§
63.3490(
d).

TABLE
3
TO
SUBPART
KKKK
OF
PART
63.
 
EMISSION
LIMITS
FOR
AFFECTED
SOURCES
USING
THE
CONTROL
EFFICIENCY/
OUTLET
CONCENTRATION
COMPLIANCE
OPTION
If
you
use
the
control
efficiency/
outlet
concentration
option
to
comply
with
the
emission
limitations
for
any
coating
operation(
s)
.
.
.
then
you
must
comply
with
one
of
the
following
by
using
an
emissions
control
system
to
.
.
.

1.
in
a
new
or
reconstructed
affected
source
..........................................
a.
reduce
emissions
of
total
HAP,
measured
as
THC
(
as
carbon),
a
by
97
percent;
or
b.
limit
emissions
of
total
HAP,
measured
as
THC
(
as
carbon)
a
to
20
ppmvd
at
the
control
device
outlet
and
use
a
PTE.
2.
in
an
existing
affected
source
..............................................................
a.
reduce
emissions
of
total
HAP,
measured
as
THC
(
as
carbon),
a
by
95
percent;
or
b.
limit
emissions
of
total
HAP,
measured
as
THC
(
as
carbon)
a
to
20
ppmvd
at
the
control
device
outlet
and
use
a
PTE.

a
You
may
choose
to
subtract
methane
from
THC
as
carbon
measurements.

If
you
are
required
to
comply
with
operating
limits
by
§
63.3492,
you
must
comply
with
the
applicable
operating
limits
in
the
following
table.

VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00051
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4755
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2160
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
TABLE
4
TO
SUBPART
KKKK
OF
PART
63.
 
OPERATING
LIMITS
IF
USING
THE
EMISSION
RATE
WITH
ADD­
ON
CONTROLS
OPTION
OR
THE
CONTROL
EFFICIENCY/
OUTLET
CONCENTRATION
COMPLIANCE
OPTION
For
the
following
device
.
.
.
You
must
meet
the
following
operating
limit
.
.
.
and
you
must
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
with
the
operating
limit
by
.
.
.

1.
thermal
oxidizer
...............
a.
the
average
combustion
temperature
in
any
3­
hour
period
must
not
fall
below
the
combustion
temperature
limit
established
according
to
§
63.3567(
a)
or
§
63.3577(
a).
i.
collecting
the
combustion
temperature
data
according
to
§
63.3568(
c)
or
§
63.3578(
c);
ii.
reducing
the
data
to
3­
hour
block
averages;
and
iii.
maintaining
the
3­
hour
average
combustion
temperature
at
or
above
the
temperature
limit.
2.
catalytic
oxidizer
..............
a.
the
average
temperature
measured
just
before
the
catalyst
bed
in
any
3­
hour
period
must
not
fall
below
the
limit
established
according
to
§
63.3567(
b)
or
§
63.3577(
b);
and
either.
i.
collecting
the
temperature
data
according
to
§
63.3568(
c)
or
§
6.3578(
c);
ii.
reducing
the
data
to
3­
hour
block
averages;
and
iii.
maintaining
the
3­
hour
average
temperature
before
the
catalyst
bed
at
or
above
the
temperature
limit.
b.
ensure
that
the
average
temperature
difference
across
the
catalyst
bed
in
any
3­
hour
period
does
not
fall
below
the
temperature
difference
limit
established
according
to
§
63.3567(
b)(
2)
or
§
63.3577(
b)(
2);
or.
i.
collecting
the
temperature
data
according
to
§
63.3568(
c)
or
§
63.3578(
c);
ii.
reducing
the
data
to
3­
hour
block
averages;
and
iii.
maintaining
the
3­
hour
average
temperature
difference
at
or
above
the
temperature
difference
limit.
c.
develop
and
implement
an
inspection
and
maintenance
plan
according
to
§
63.3567(
b)
(
3)
and
(
4)
or
§
63.3577(
b)
(
3)
and
(
4).
maintaining
an
up­
to­
date
inspection
plan,
records
of
annual
catalyst
activity
checks,
records
of
monthly
inspections
of
the
oxidizer
system,
and
records
of
the
annual
internal
inspections
of
the
catalyst
bed.
If
a
problem
is
discovered
during
a
monthly
or
annual
inspection
required
by
§
63.3567(
b)
(
3)
and
(
4)
or
§
63.3577(
b)
(
3)
and
(
4),
you
must
take
corrective
action
as
soon
as
practicable
consistent
with
the
manufacturer's
recommendations.
3.
carbon
adsorber
...............
a.
the
total
regeneration
desorbing
gas
(
e.
g.,
steam
or
nitrogen)
mass
flow
for
each
carbon
bed
regeneration
cycle
must
not
fall
below
the
total
regeneration
desorbing
gas
mass
flow
limit
established
according
to
§
63.3567(
c)
or
§
63.3577(
c).
i.
measuring
the
total
regeneration
desorbing
gas
(
e.
g.,
steam
or
nitrogen)
mass
flow
for
each
regeneration
cycle
according
to
§
63.3568(
d)
or
§
63.3578(
d);
and
ii.
maintaining
the
total
regeneration
desorbing
gas
mass
flow
at
or
above
the
mass
flow
limit.
b.
the
temperature
of
the
carbon
bed,
after
completing
each
regeneration
and
any
cooling
cycle,
must
not
exceed
the
carbon
bed
temperature
limit
established
according
to
§
63.3567(
c)
or
§
63.3577(
c).
i.
measuring
the
temperature
of
the
carbon
bed,
after
completing
each
regeneration
and
any
cooling
cycle,
according
to
§
63.3568(
d)
or
§
63.3578(
d);
and
ii.
operating
the
carbon
beds
such
that
each
carbon
bed
is
not
returned
to
service
until
completing
each
regeneration
and
any
cooling
cycle
until
the
recorded
temperature
of
the
carbon
bed
is
at
or
below
the
temperature
limit.
4.
condenser
........................
a.
the
average
condenser
outlet
(
product
side)
gas
temperature
in
any
3­
hour
period
must
not
exceed
the
temperature
limit
established
according
to
§
63.3567(
d)
or
§
63.3577(
d).
i.
collecting
the
condenser
outlet
(
product
side)
gas
temperature
according
to
§
63.3568(
e)
or
§
63.3578(
e);
ii.
reducing
the
data
to
3­
hour
block
averages;
and
iii.
maintaining
the
3­
hour
average
gas
temperature
at
the
outlet
at
or
below
the
temperature
limit.
5.
concentrators,
including
zeolite
wheels
and
rotary
carbon
adsorbers.
a.
the
average
gas
temperature
of
the
desorption
concentrate
stream
in
any
3­
hour
period
must
not
fall
below
the
limit
established
according
to
§
63.3567(
e)
or
§
63.3577(
e).
i.
collecting
the
temperature
data
according
to
§
63.3568(
f)
or
§
63.3578(
f);
ii.
Reducing
the
data
to
3­
hour
block
averages;
and
iii.
Maintaining
the
3­
hour
average
temperature
at
or
above
the
temperature
limit.
b.
the
average
pressure
drop
of
the
dilute
stream
across
the
concentrator
in
any
3­
hour
period
must
not
fall
below
the
limit
established
according
to
§
63.3567(
e)
or
§
63.3577(
e).
i.
collecting
the
pressure
drop
data
according
to
§
63.3568(
f)
or
§
63.3578(
f);
ii.
reducing
the
pressure
drop
data
to
3­
hour
block
averages;
and
iii.
maintaining
the
3­
hour
average
pressure
drop
at
or
above
the
pressure
drop
limit.
6.
emission
capture
system
that
is
a
PTE
according
to
§
63.3565(
a)
or
§
63.3575(
a).
a.
the
direction
of
the
air
flow
at
all
times
must
be
into
the
enclosure;
and
either.
i.
collecting
the
direction
of
air
flow,
and
either
the
facial
velocity
of
air
through
all
natural
draft
openings
according
to
§
63.3568(
g)(
1)
or
§
63.3578(
g)(
1)
or
the
pressure
drop
across
the
enclosure
according
to
§
63.3568(
g)(
2)
or
§
63.3578(
g)(
2);
and
ii.
maintaining
the
facial
velocity
of
air
flow
through
all
natural
draft
openings
or
the
pressure
drop
at
or
above
the
facial
velocity
limit
or
pressure
drop
limit,
and
maintaining
the
direction
of
air
flow
into
the
enclosure
at
all
times.
b.
the
average
facial
velocity
of
air
through
all
natural
draft
openings
in
the
enclosure
must
be
at
least
200
feet
per
minute;
or.
see
items
6.
a.
i
and
ii.

VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00052
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4755
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2161
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
TABLE
4
TO
SUBPART
KKKK
OF
PART
63.
 
OPERATING
LIMITS
IF
USING
THE
EMISSION
RATE
WITH
ADD­
ON
CONTROLS
OPTION
OR
THE
CONTROL
EFFICIENCY/
OUTLET
CONCENTRATION
COMPLIANCE
OPTION
 
Continued
For
the
following
device
.
.
.
You
must
meet
the
following
operating
limit
.
.
.
and
you
must
demonstrate
continuous
compliance
with
the
operating
limit
by
.
.
.

c.
the
pressure
drop
across
the
enclosure
must
be
at
least
0.007
inch
H2O,
as
established
in
Method
204
of
appendix
M
to
40
CFR
part
51.
see
items
6.
a.
i
and
ii.

7.
emission
capture
system
that
is
not
a
PTE
according
to
§
63.3565(
a)
or
§
63.3575(
a).
a.
the
average
gas
volumetric
flow
rate
or
duct
static
pressure
in
each
duct
between
a
capture
device
and
add­
on
control
device
inlet
in
any
3­
hour
period
must
not
fall
below
the
average
volumetric
flow
rate
or
duct
static
pressure
limit
established
for
that
capture
device
according
to
§
63.3567(
f)
§
63.3577(
f).
i.
collecting
the
gas
volumetric
flow
rate
or
duct
static
pressure
for
each
capture
device
according
to
§
63.3568(
g)
or
§
63.3578(
g);
ii.
reducing
the
data
to
3­
hour
block
averages;
and
iii.
maintaining
the
3­
hour
average
gas
volumetric
flow
rate
or
duct
static
pressure
for
each
capture
device
at
or
above
the
gas
volumetric
flow
rate
or
duct
static
pressure
limit.

You
must
comply
with
the
applicable
General
Provisions
requirements
according
to
the
following
table.

TABLE
5
TO
SUBPART
KKKK
OF
PART
63.
 
APPLICABILITY
OF
GENERAL
PROVISIONS
TO
SUBPART
KKKK
Citation
Subject
Applicable
to
subpart
KKKK
Explanation
§
63.1(
a)(
1)
 
(
14)
............................
General
Applicability
.....................
Yes.
§
63.1(
b)(
1)
 
(
3)
..............................
Initial
Applicability
Determination
..
Yes
................................................
Applicability
to
subpart
KKKK
is
also
specified
in
§
63.3481.
§
63.1(
c)(
1)
.....................................
Applicability
After
Standard
Established
Yes.

§
63.1(
c)(
2)
 
(
3)
..............................
Applicability
of
Permit
Program
for
Area
Sources.
No
.................................................
Area
sources
are
not
subject
to
subpart
KKKK.
§
63.1(
c)(
4)
 
(
5)
..............................
Extensions
and
Notifications
........
Yes.
§
63.1(
e)
.........................................
Applicability
of
Permit
Program
Before
Relevant
Standard
is
Set.
Yes.

§
63.2
.............................................
Definitions
.....................................
Yes
................................................
Additional
definitions
are
specified
in
§
63.3581.
§
63.3(
a)
 
(
c)
...................................
Units
and
Abbreviations
...............
Yes.
§
63.4(
a)(
1)
 
(
5)
..............................
Prohibited
Activities
......................
Yes.
§
63.4(
b)
 
(
c)
...................................
Circumvention/
Severability
...........
Yes.
§
63.5(
a)
.........................................
Construction/
Reconstruction
.........
Yes.
§
63.5(
b)(
1)
 
(
6)
..............................
Requirements
for
Existing,
Newly
Constructed,
and
Reconstructed
Sources.
Yes.

§
63.5(
d)
.........................................
Application
for
Approval
of
Construction
Reconstruction.
Yes.

§
63.5(
e)
.........................................
Approval
of
Construction/
Reconstruction
Yes.

§
63.5(
f)
..........................................
Approval
of
Construction/
Reconstruction
Based
on
Prior
State
Review.
Yes.

§
63.6(
a)
.........................................
Compliance
With
Standards
and
Maintenance
Requirements
 
Applicability.
Yes.

§
63.6(
b)(
1)
 
(
7)
..............................
Compliance
Dates
for
New
and
Reconstructed
Sources.
Yes
................................................
Section
63.3483
specifies
the
compliance
dates.
§
63.6(
c)(
1)
 
(
5)
..............................
Compliance
Dates
for
Existing
Sources.
Yes
................................................
Section
63.3483
specifies
the
compliance
dates.
§
63.6(
e)(
1)
 
(
2)
..............................
Operation
and
Maintenance
.........
Yes.
§
63.6(
e)(
3)
.....................................
SSMP
............................................
Yes
................................................
Only
sources
using
an
add­
on
control
device
to
comply
with
the
standard
must
complete
SSMP.
§
63.6(
f)(
1)
......................................
Compliance
Except
During
Startup
Shutdown,
and
Malfunction.
Yes
................................................
Applies
only
to
sources
using
an
add­
on
control
device
to
comply
with
the
standards.
§
63.6(
f)(
2)
 
(
3)
...............................
Methods
for
Determining
Compliance
Yes.

§
63.6(
g)(
1)
 
(
3)
..............................
Use
of
an
Alternative
Standard
....
Yes.
§
63.6(
h)
.........................................
Compliance
With
Opacity/
Visible
Emission
Standards.
No
.................................................
Subpart
KKKK
does
not
establish
opacity
standards
and
does
not
require
continuous
opacity
monitoring
systems
(
COMS).
§
63.6(
i)(
1)
 
(
16)
.............................
Extension
of
Compliance
..............
Yes.

VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00053
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4755
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2162
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
TABLE
5
TO
SUBPART
KKKK
OF
PART
63.
 
APPLICABILITY
OF
GENERAL
PROVISIONS
TO
SUBPART
KKKK
 
Continued
Citation
Subject
Applicable
to
subpart
KKKK
Explanation
§
63.6(
j)
..........................................
Presidential
Compliance
Exemption
Yes.

§
63.7(
a)(
1)
.....................................
Performance
Test
Requirements
 
Applicability.
Yes
................................................
Applies
to
all
affected
sources.
Additional
requirements
for
performance
testing
are
specified
in
§
§
63.3564,
63.3565,
63.3566,
,
63.3575,
and
63.3576.
§
63.7(
a)(
2)
.....................................
Performance
Test
Requirements
 
Dates.
Yes
................................................
Applies
only
to
performance
tests
for
capture
system
and
control
device
efficiency
at
sources
using
these
to
comply
with
the
standards.
Sections
63.3560
and
63.3570
specify
the
schedule
for
performance
test
requirements
that
are
earlier
than
those
specified
in
§
63.7(
a)(
2).
§
63.7(
a)(
3)
.....................................
Performance
Tests
Required
By
the
Administrator.
.......................................................
Yes
§
63.7(
b)
 
(
e)
...................................
Performance
Test
Requirements
 
Notification,
Quality
Assurance
Facilities
Necessary
for
Safe
Testing,
Conditions
During
Test.
Yes
................................................
Applies
only
to
performance
tests
for
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
efficiency
at
sources
using
these
to
comply
with
the
standards.
§
63.7(
f)
..........................................
Performance
Test
Requirementsk
 
Use
of
Alternative
Test
Method.
Yes
................................................
Applies
to
all
test
methods
except
those
used
to
determine
capture
system
efficiency.
§
63.7(
g)
 
(
h)
...................................
Performance
Test
Requirements
 
Data
Analysis,
Recordkeeping
Reporting,
Waiver
of
Test.
Yes
................................................
Applies
only
to
performance
tests
for
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
efficiency
at
sources
using
these
to
comply
with
the
standards.
§
63.8(
a)(
1)
 
(
3)
..............................
Monitoring
Requirements
 
Applicability
Yes
................................................
Applies
only
to
monitoring
of
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
efficiency
at
sources
using
these
to
comply
with
the
standards.
Additional
requirements
for
monitoring
are
specified
in
§
§
63.3568
and
63.3578.
§
63.8(
a)(
4)
.....................................
Additional
Monitoring
Requirements
No
.................................................
Subpart
KKKK
does
not
have
monitoring
requirements
for
flares.
§
63.8(
b)
.........................................
Conduct
of
Monitoring
..................
Yes.
§
63.8(
c)(
1)
 
(
3)
..............................
Continuous
Monitoring
System
(
CMS)
Operataion
and
Maintenance
Yes
................................................
Applies
only
to
monitoring
of
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
efficiency
at
sources
using
these
to
comply
with
the
standards.
Additional
requirements
for
CMS
operations
and
maintenance
are
specified
in
§
§
63.3568
and
63.3578.
§
63.8(
c)(
4)
.....................................
CMS
..............................................
No
.................................................
Sections
63.3568
and
63.3578
specify
the
requirements
for
the
operation
of
CMS
for
capture
systems
and
add­
on
control
devices
at
sources
using
these
to
comply.
§
63.8(
c)(
5)
.....................................
COMS
...........................................
No
.................................................
Subpart
KKKK
does
not
have
opacity
or
visible
emission
standards.
§
63.8(
c)(
6)
.....................................
CMS
Requirements
......................
No
.................................................
Sections
63.3568
and
63.3578
specify
the
requirements
for
monitoring
systems
for
capture
systems
and
add­
on
control
devices
at
sources
using
these
to
comply.
§
63.8(
c)(
7)
.....................................
CMS
Out­
of­
control
Periods
.........
Yes.
§
63.8(
c)(
8)
.....................................
CMS
Out­
of­
control
Period
Reporting
No
.................................................
Section
63.3520
requires
reporting
of
CMS
out
of
control
periods

VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00054
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4755
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2163
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
TABLE
5
TO
SUBPART
KKKK
OF
PART
63.
 
APPLICABILITY
OF
GENERAL
PROVISIONS
TO
SUBPART
KKKK
 
Continued
Citation
Subject
Applicable
to
subpart
KKKK
Explanation
§
63.8(
d)
 
(
e)
...................................
Quality
Control
Program
and
CMS
Performance
Evaluation.
Yes
................................................
Applies
only
to
sources
using
the
outlet
concentration
limit
option
to
comply
with
the
standards.
§
63.8(
f)(
1)
 
(
5)
...............................
Use
of
an
Alternative
Monitoring
Method.
Yes.

§
63.8(
f)(
6)
......................................
Alternative
to
Relative
Accuracy
Test.
Yes
................................................
Applies
only
to
sources
using
the
outlet
concentration
limit
option
to
comply
with
the
standards.
§
63.8(
g)(
1)
 
(
5)
..............................
Data
Reduction
.............................
No
.................................................
§
§
63.3563,
63.3568,
63.3573
and
63.3578
specify
monitoring
data
reduction.
§
63.9(
a)
 
(
d)
...................................
Notification
Requirements
............
Yes.
§
63.9(
e)
.........................................
Notification
of
Performance
Test
..
Yes
................................................
Applies
only
to
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
performance
tests
at
sources
using
these
to
comply
with
the
standards
§
63.9(
f)
..........................................
Notification
of
Visible
Emissions/
Opacity
Test.
No
.................................................
Subpart
KKKK
does
not
have
opacity
or
visible
emission
standards.
§
63.9(
g)(
1)
 
(
3)
..............................
Additional
Notifications
When
Using
CMS.
Yes
................................................
Applies
only
to
sources
using
the
outlet
concentration
limit
option
to
comply
with
the
standards.
§
63.9(
h)
.........................................
Notification
of
Compliance
Status
Yes
................................................
Section
63.3510
specifies
the
dates
for
submitting
the
notification
of
compliance
status.
§
63.9(
i)
..........................................
Adjustment
of
Submittal
Deadlines
Yes.

§
63.9(
j)
..........................................
Change
in
Previous
Information
...
Yes.
§
63.10(
a)
.......................................
Recordkeeping/
Reporting
 
Applicability
and
General
Information.
Yes.

§
63.10(
b)(
1)
...................................
General
Recordkeeping
Requirements
Yes
................................................
Additional
requirements
are
specified
in
§
§
63.3530
and
63.3531.
§
63.10(
b)(
2)(
i)
 
(
v)
.........................
Recordkeeping
Relevant
to
Startup
Shutdown,
and
Malfunction
Periods
and
CMS.
Yes
................................................
Requirements
for
Startup,
Shutdown
and
Malfunction
records
only
apply
to
add­
on
control
devices
used
to
comply
with
the
standards.
§
63.10(
b)(
2)(
vi)
 
(
xi)
.......................
.......................................................
Yes.
§
63.10(
b)(
2)(
xii)
.............................
Records
........................................
Yes.
§
63.10(
b)(
2)(
xiii)
............................
.......................................................
Yes
................................................
Applies
only
to
sources
using
the
outlet
concentration
limit
option
to
comply
with
the
standards.
§
63.10(
b)(
2)(
xiv)
............................
.......................................................
Yes.
§
63.10(
b)(
3)
...................................
Recordkeeping
Requirements
for
Applicability
Determinations.
Yes.

§
63.10(
c)(
1)
 
(
6)
............................
Additional
Recordkeeping
Requirements
for
Sources
with
CMS.
Yes.

§
63.10(
c)(
7)
 
(
8)
............................
.......................................................
No
.................................................
The
same
records
are
required
in
§
63.3520(
a)(
7).
§
63.10(
c)(
9)
 
(
15)
..........................
.......................................................
Yes.
§
63.10(
d)(
1)
...................................
General
Reporting
Requirements
Yes
................................................
Additional
requirements
are
specified
in
§
63.3520.
§
63.10(
d)(
2)
...................................
Report
of
Performance
Test
Results
Yes
................................................
Additional
requirements
are
specified
in
§
63.3520(
b).
§
63.10(
d)(
3)
...................................
Reporting
Opacity
Visible
Emissions
Observations.
No
.................................................
Subpart
KKKK
does
or
not
require
opacity
or
visible
emissions
observations
§
63.10(
d)(
4)
...................................
Progress
Reports
for
Sources
With
Compliance
Extensions.
Yes.

§
63.10(
d)(
5)
...................................
Startup,
Shutdown,
and
Malfunction
Reports.
Yes
................................................
Applies
only
to
add­
on
control
devices
at
sources
using
these
to
comply
with
the
standards.
§
63.10(
e)(
1)
 
(
2)
............................
Additional
CMS
Reports
...............
Yes
................................................
Applies
only
to
sources
using
the
outlet
concentration
limit
option
to
comply
with
the
standards.
§
63.10(
e)(
3)
...................................
Excess
Emissions/
CMS
Performance
Reports.
No
.................................................
Section
63.3520(
b)
specifies
the
contents
of
periodic
compliance
reports.

VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00055
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4755
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2
2164
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
10
/
Wednesday,
January
15,
2003
/
Proposed
Rules
TABLE
5
TO
SUBPART
KKKK
OF
PART
63.
 
APPLICABILITY
OF
GENERAL
PROVISIONS
TO
SUBPART
KKKK
 
Continued
Citation
Subject
Applicable
to
subpart
KKKK
Explanation
§
63.10(
e)(
4)
...................................
COMS
Data
Reports
....................
No
.................................................
Subpart
KKKK
does
not
specify
requirements
for
opacity
or
COMS.
§
63.10(
f)
........................................
Recordkeeping/
Reporting
Waiver
Yes.
§
63.11
...........................................
Control
Device
Requirements/
Flares.
No
.................................................
Subpart
KKKK
does
not
specify
use
of
flares
for
compliance.
§
63.12
...........................................
State
Authority
and
Delegations
...
Yes.
§
63.13
...........................................
Addresses
.....................................
Yes.
§
63.14
...........................................
Incorporation
by
Reference
..........
Yes.
§
63.15
...........................................
Availability
of
Information/
Confidentiality
Yes.

You
may
use
the
mass
fraction
values
in
the
following
table
for
solvent
blends
for
which
you
do
not
have
test
data
or
manufacturer's
formulation
data.

TABLE
6
TO
SUBPART
KKKK
OF
PART
63.
 
DEFAULT
ORGANIC
HAP
MASS
FRACTION
FOR
SOLVENTS
AND
SOLVENT
BLENDS
Solvent/
solvent
blend
CAS.
No.
Average
organic
HAP
mass
fraction
Typical
organic
HAP,
percent
by
mass
1.
Toluene
...................................
108
 
88
 
3
......................................
1.0
.................................................
Toluene.
2.
Xylene(
s)
.................................
1330
 
20
 
7
....................................
1.0
.................................................
Xylenes,
ethylbenzene.
3.
Hexane
....................................
110
 
54
 
3
......................................
0.5
.................................................
n­
hexane.
4.
n­
Hexane
................................
110
 
54
 
3
......................................
1.0
.................................................
n­
hexane.
5.
Ethylbenzene
..........................
100
 
41
 
4
......................................
1.0
.................................................
Ethylbenzene.
6.
Aliphatic
140
...........................
.......................................................
0
....................................................
None.
7.
Aromatic
100
...........................
.......................................................
0.02
...............................................
1%
xylene,
1%
cumene.
8.
Aromatic
150
...........................
.......................................................
0.09
...............................................
Naphthalene.
9.
Aromatic
naphtha
....................
64742
 
95
 
6
..................................
0.02
...............................................
1%
xylene,
1%
cumene.
10.
Aromatic
solvent
.....................
64742
 
94
 
5
..................................
0.1
.................................................
Naphthalene.
11.
Exempt
mineral
spirits
............
8032
 
32
 
4
....................................
0
....................................................
None.
12.
Ligroines
(
VM
&
P)
.................
8032
 
32
 
4
....................................
0
....................................................
None.
13.
Lactol
spirits
............................
64742
 
89
 
6
..................................
0.15
...............................................
Toluene.
14.
Low
aromatic
white
spirit
........
64742
 
82
 
1
..................................
0
....................................................
None.
15.
Mineral
spirits
..........................
64742
 
88
 
7
..................................
0.01
...............................................
Xylenes.
16.
Hydrotreated
naphtha
.............
64742
 
48
 
9
..................................
0
....................................................
None.
17.
Hydrotreated
light
distillate
.....
64742
 
47
 
8
..................................
0.001
.............................................
Toluene.
18.
Stoddard
solvent
.....................
8052
 
41
 
3
....................................
0.01
...............................................
Xylenes.
19.
Super
high­
flash
naphtha
.......
64742
 
95
 
6
..................................
0.05
...............................................
Xylenes.
20.
Varsol
 
solvent
.......................
8052
 
49
 
3
....................................
0.01
...............................................
0.5%
xylenes,
0.5%
ethylbenzene.
21.
VM
&
P
Naphtha
.....................
64742
 
89
 
8
..................................
0.06
...............................................
3%
toluene,
3%
xylene.
22.
Petroleum
distillate
mixture
.....
68477
 
31
 
6
..................................
0.08
...............................................
4%
naphthalene,
4%
biphenyl.

You
may
use
the
mass
fraction
values
in
the
following
table
for
solvent
blends
for
which
you
do
not
have
test
data
or
manufacturer's
formulation
data.

TABLE
7
TO
SUBPART
KKKK
OF
PART
63.
 
DEFAULT
ORGANIC
HAP
MASS
FRACTION
FOR
PETROLEUM
SOLVENT
GROUPS
a
Solvent
type
Average
organic
HAP,
mass
fraction
Typical
Organic
HAP
percent
by
mass
Aliphatic
b
...........................................................
0.03
...................................................................
1%
Xylene,
1%
Toluene,
and
1%
Ethylbenzene
Aromatic
c
...........................................................
0.06
...................................................................
4%
Xylene,
1%
Toluene,
and
1%
Ethylbenzene
a
Use
this
table
only
if
the
solvent
blend
does
not
match
any
of
the
solvent
blends
in
Table
6
to
this
subpart
and
you
only
know
whether
the
blend
is
aliphatic
or
aromatic.
b
e.
g.,
Mineral
Spirits
135,
Mineral
Spirits
150
EC,
Naphtha,
Mixed
Hydrocarbon,
Aliphatic
Hydrocarbon,
Aliphatic
Naphtha,
Naphthol
Spirits,
Petroleum
Spirits,
Petroleum
Oil,
Petroleum
Naphtha,
Solvent
Naphtha,
Solvent
Blend.
c
e.
g.,
Medium­
flash
Naphtha,
High­
flash
Naphtha,
Aromatic
Naphtha,
Light
Aromatic
Naphtha,
Light
Aromatic
Hydrocarbons,
Aromatic
Hydrocarbons
Light
Aromatic
Solvent.

[
FR
Doc.
03
 
87
Filed
1
 
14
 
03;
8:
45
am]

BILLING
CODE
6560
 
50
 
P
VerDate
Dec<
13>
2002
19:
04
Jan
14,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00056
Fmt
4701
Sfmt
4755
E:\
FR\
FM\
15JAP2.
SGM
15JAP2