Document ID: EPA-R02-OAR-2006-0342-0003
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2006-05-09T04:00Z

The
State
of
New
Jersey
Department
of
Environmental
Protection
Proposed
State
Implementation
Plan
(
SIP)
Revisions
for
the
Attainment
and
Maintenance
of
the
8­
Hour
Carbon
Monoxide
National
Ambient
Air
Quality
Standard,
1­
Hour
Ozone
National
Ambient
Air
Quality
Standard,
and
Fine
Particulate
Matter
National
Ambient
Air
Quality
Standard;
and
the
2002
Periodic
Emission
Inventory
February
2006
i
Preface
New
Jersey
is
proposing
revisions
to
several
State
Implementation
Plans
(
SIP)
that
cover
the
attainment
and
maintenance
of
the
8­
Hour
Carbon
Monoxide
National
Ambient
Air
Quality
Standard,
the
1­
Hour
Ozone
National
Ambient
Air
Quality
Standard,
and
the
Annual
Fine
Particulate
Matter
National
Ambient
Air
Quality
Standard.
In
addition,
the
2002
Periodic
Emission
Inventory
is
being
submitted.

Specifically,
proposed
SIP
revisions
include
updated
carbon
monoxide
and
ozone
budgets
for
northern
New
Jersey
for
transportation
conformity
purposes
that
incorporate
updated
planning
assumptions;
a
revised
general
conformity
emission
budget
for
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
to
ensure
that
increases
in
activity
at
the
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
conform
with
the
ozone
SIP;
a
fine
particulate
matter,
PM2.5,
transportation
conformity
budget
for
northern
New
Jersey
for
the
interim
period
prior
to
the
PM2.5
attainment
demonstration
SIP;
a
carbon
monoxide
limited
maintenance
plan
for
Camden
County
and
the
nine
not­
classified
areas
for
the
second
ten­
year
compliance
period;
and
the
2002
periodic
emission
inventory.

Acknowledgments
The
New
Jersey
Department
of
Environmental
Protection
acknowledges
the
efforts
and
assistance
of
the
many
agencies
and
individuals
whose
contributions
were
instrumental
in
the
preparation
of
this
State
Implementation
Plan
Revision.
In
particular,
the
New
Jersey
Department
of
Environmental
Protection
wishes
to
acknowledge
the
many
individuals
within
the
New
Jersey
Department
of
Transportation,
the
United
States
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Region
2,
and
the
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority,
the
Delaware
Valley
Regional
Planning
Commission,
and
as
well
as
staff
within
the
New
Jersey
Department
of
Environmental
Protection
for
their
assistance
and
guidance.
ii
Table
of
Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................................
i
Acknowledgements.................................................................................................................
i
Table
of
Contents....................................................................................................................
ii
List
of
Tables..........................................................................................................................
iv
List
of
Figures.........................................................................................................................
v
List
of
Appendices
and
Attachments
.......................................................................................
vi
Acronyms
and
Abbreviations
..................................................................................................
vii
Executive
Summary................................................................................................................
viii
I.
Introduction.................................................................................................................
1
II.
Conformity
Emission
Budgets.....................................................................................
1
A.
Background
.....................................................................................................
2
B.
Revised
Budgets
..............................................................................................
3
1.
1­
Hour
Ozone
and
a
Carbon
Monoxide
Budget
for
Northern
New
Jersey...................................................................................................
3
i.
Effect
of
Updated
Transportation
Conformity
Emission
Budgets
on
the
Carbon
Monoxide
Maintenance
Plans...............
9
ii.
Effect
of
Updated
Transportation
Conformity
Emission
Budgets
on
the
Ozone
Attainment
Demonstration.....................
9
2.
Amendment
to
the
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
Conformity
Budget
..........
12
C.
New
Budget
 
Particulate
Matter
Budget
for
Northern
New
Jersey
..................
15
1.
PM2.5
General
Background...................................................................
16
2.
Establishment
of
the
PM2.5
Standard.....................................................
16
3.
Designation
of
PM2.5
Nonattainment
Areas
in
New
Jersey....................
17
4.
Transportation
Conformity
for
PM2.5
.....................................................
18
5.
Early
PM2.5
Transportation
Conformity
Emission
Budgets
....................
20
i.
PM2.5
and
Annual
NOx
Inventories
for
2002
and
2009
..............
20
ii.
Early
Transportation
Conformity
Emission
Budgets
for
PM2.5
and
Annual
NOx..............................................................
24
III.
8­
Hour
Carbon
Monoxide
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
for
Southern
New
Jersey
and
the
Nine
Not­
Classified
Areas
..............................................................................
26
A.
Background
.....................................................................................................
26
B.
Air
Quality
Update
..........................................................................................
28
C.
The
USEPA
Guidance
and
Requirements
for
Limited
Maintenance
Plans........
30
D.
8­
Hour
Carbon
Monoxide
Maintenance
Plan
...................................................
32
1.
Attainment
Inventory
...........................................................................
32
2.
Maintenance
Demonstration.................................................................
34
3.
Monitoring
Network.............................................................................
34
4.
Verification
of
Continued
Attainment...................................................
34
5.
Contingency
Plan
.................................................................................
36
6.
Transportation
Conformity
...................................................................
37
iii
IV.
2002
Periodic
Emission
Inventory...............................................................................
38
A.
Background
.....................................................................................................
38
1.
Statutory
and
Regulatory
Background
..................................................
38
2.
Emission
Inventory
Overview
..............................................................
38
3.
Emission
Inventory
Summary
..............................................................
41
4.
Emissions
Comparison
Summary
.........................................................
50
V.
Public
Participation
.....................................................................................................
50
iv
List
of
Tables
Table
ES1
Updated
Carbon
Monoxide
and
1­
Hour
Ozone
Transportation
Conformity
Emission
Budgets
......................................................................
ix
Table
ES2
Comparison
of
the
Updated
Carbon
Monoxide
and
1­
Hour
Ozone
Transportation
Conformity
Emission
Budgets
with
Prior
Budgets.................
ix
Table
ES3
Emission
Budgets
for
McGuire
Air
Force
Base.............................................
xi
Table
ES4
New
PM2.5
Transportation
Conformity
Emission
Budgets.............................
xii
Table
I
Updated
Transportation
Conformity
Emission
Budgets.................................
5
Table
II
Comparison
of
the
Updated
Transportation
Conformity
Emission
Budgets
with
Prior
Budgets...........................................................................
5
Table
III
Maintenance
Plan
Inventories
for
the
New
Jersey
Portion
of
the
New
York
City/
Northern
New
Jersey/
Long
Island
Carbon
Monoxide
Nonattainment
Area
......................................................................................
6
Table
IV
2007
Margin
of
Safety
Calculation................................................................
7
Table
V
2014
Margin
of
Safety
Calculation................................................................
8
Table
VI
Comparison
of
the
Onroad
Previous
Inventories
to
the
Updated
Onroad
Inventories
(
Tons
per
Ozone
Day
Unless
Designated
Otherwise)
..................
11
Table
VII
Emission
Budgets
for
McGuire
Air
Force
Base.............................................
15
Table
VIIII
Direct
PM2.5
Emission
Inventories
for
2002
and
2009
for
the
New
Jersey
Portion
of
the
New
York
/
New
Jersey/
Long
Island/
Connecticut
PM2.5
Nonattainment
Area
......................................................................................
21
Table
IX
Direct
PM2.5:
Calculation
of
the
Percent
Reduction
in
Projected
2009
Emissions
From
the
2002
Emissions
by
County............................................
22
Table
X
Annual
NOx
Emission
Inventories
for
2002
and
2009
for
the
New
Jersey
Portion
of
the
New
York
/
New
Jersey/
Long
Island/
Connecticut
PM2.5
Nonattainment
Area
......................................................................................
23
Table
XI
Annual
NOx:
Calculation
of
the
Percent
Reduction
in
Projected
2009
Emissions
from
the
2002
Emissions
by
County.............................................
24
Table
XII
Transportation
Conformity
Emission
Budgets...............................................
25
Table
XIII
Design
Values
for
Carbon
Monoxide
in
New
Jersey
(
8­
hour
standard)..........
30
Table
XIV
New
Jersey
Carbon
Monoxide
Maintenance
Plan
and
Contingency
Measure
History
...........................................................................................
32
Table
XV
New
Jersey
Wintertime
Carbon
Monoxide
Emissions
(
tons
per
winter
day)
for
2002
................................................................................................
33
Table
XVI
2002
Inventories
Prepared.............................................................................
41
Table
XVII
2002
Statewide
Emission
Inventory
by
Source
Sector
and
Pollutant..............
42
Table
XVIII
2002
Statewide
Emission
Inventory
by
County
and
Pollutant........................
43
Table
XIX
2002
Statewide
Emission
Inventory
by
County
and
Source
Sector
................
45
Table
XX
1996
and
2002
Statewide
Emission
Inventory
by
Source
Sector
and
Pollutant
.......................................................................................................
50
v
List
of
Figures
Figure
I
Metropolitan
Planning
Organizations
in
New
Jersey
........................................
4
Figure
II
Carbon
Monoxide
Air
Quality,
1975­
2004,
2nd
Highest
8­
Hour
Average
........
7
Figure
III
USEPA
Designations
of
Nonattainment
Areas
for
PM2.5
in
New
Jersey
...........
19
Figure
IV
New
Jersey
Carbon
Monoxide
Maintenance
Areas...........................................
29
Figure
V
New
Jersey
Carbon
Monoxide
Monitoring
Network
(
2004)
.............................
35
Figure
VI
New
Jersey
8­
Hour
Ozone
Nonattainment
Areas..............................................
39
Figure
VII
New
Jersey
Fine
Particulate
Matter
Nonattainment
Areas
................................
40
vi
List
of
Appendices
Appendix
A
History
of
New
Jersey's
Carbon
Monoxide
State
Implementation
Plans
Appendix
B
History
of
New
Jersey's
Ozone
State
Implementation
Plans
*
Appendix
C
Transportation
Conformity
Emission
Budget
Back­
up
Files
Appendix
D
2002
Periodic
Emissions
Inventory
Document
Attachment
1
Inventory
Top
15
by
SCC
Graphs
Attachment
2
Fugitive
Dust
Inventory
Discussion
and
Summary
Attachment
3
Point
Source:
Creating
the
2002
Point
Source
Inventory
Attachment
4*
Point
Source
VOC
Inventory
Attachment
5*
Point
Source
NOx
Inventory
Attachment
6*
Point
Source
CO
Inventory
Attachment
7*
Point
Source
PM10
Inventory
Attachment
8*
Point
Source
PM2.5
Inventory
Attachment
9*
Point
Source
SO2
Inventory
Attachment
10*
Point
Source
NH3
Inventory
Attachment
11*
Area
Source
Calculation
Sheets
Attachment
12*
Area
Source
Inventories
Attachment
13*
Onroad
Source
DVMT
Attachment
14*
Onroad
Source
PPSUITE
Files
Attachment
15*
Onroad
Source
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority
Calculation
Files
Attachment
16*
Onroad
Source
South
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Organization
Calculation
Files
Attachment
17*
Onroad
Source
Delaware
Valley
Regional
Planning
Commission
Calculation
Files
Attachment
18*
Onroad
Source
Inventory
Attachment
19
Onroad
Sources
Refueling
Emissions
by
County
Attachment
20*
Nonroad
Calculation
Sheets
for
Orphan
Categories
Attachment
21*
Nonroad
Source
Inventory
Attachment
22*
Biogenic
Source
NH3
Inventory
Attachment
23
Point
Source
Quality
Assurance
Documentation
Attachment
24
Point
Source
Detailed
Information
Attachment
25*
Area
Source
Inventory
Comparisons
*
Note:
These
appendices
and
attachments
are
only
available
electronically.
vii
Acronyms
and
Abbreviations
AADF
Annual
Activity
Day
Factors
CFR
Code
of
Federal
Regulations
CNG
Compressed
Natural
Gas
DVMT
Daily
Vehicle
Miles
Traveled
EDMS
Emissions
and
Dispersion
Modeling
System
EWR
Newark
Liberty
International
Airport
FMVCP
Federal
Motor
Vehicle
Control
Program
FR
Federal
Register
GSE
Ground
Support
Equipment
HDDV
Heavy
Duty
Diesel
Vehicles
I/
M
Inspection
and
Maintenance
LDGT
Light
Duty
Gasoline
Trucks
LDGV
Light
Duty
Gasoline
Vehicle
LPG
Liquefied
Petroleum
Gas
LTO
Landing
and
Take­
off
Operations
NAAQS
National
Ambient
Air
Quality
Standards
NEI
National
Emissions
Inventory
NH3
Ammonia
NJDEP
New
Jersey
Department
of
Environmental
Protection
NJR
New
Jersey
Register
NLEV
National
Low
Emission
Vehicle
NNEM
NONROAD
Emission
Model
NOx
Oxides
of
Nitrogen
PM2.5
Fine
Particulate
Matter
(
particles
with
an
aerodynamic
diameter
less
than
or
equal
to
a
nominal
2.5
micrometers)
PM10
Particles
with
an
aerodynamic
diameter
less
than
or
equal
to
a
nominal
10
micrometers
PPSUITE
Performance
Evaluation
and
Emissions
Analysis
P.
L.
Public
Law
RACT
Reasonably
Available
Control
Technology
RFG
Reformulated
Gasoline
RVP
Reid
Vapor
Pressure
SCC
Source
Classification
Code
SIP
State
Implementation
Plan
SMOKE
Sparse
Matrix
Operator
Kernel
Emissions
SO2
Sulfur
Dioxide
SOx
Oxides
of
Sulfur
U.
S.
C.
United
States
Code
USEPA
United
States
Environmental
Protection
Agency
VOCs
Volatile
Organic
Compounds
viii
Executive
Summary
The
State
of
New
Jersey
is
proposing
several
revisions
to
its
State
Implementation
Plans
(
SIPs)
governing
the
National
Ambient
Air
Quality
Standards
(
NAAQS)
for
carbon
monoxide,
ozone,
and
fine
particulate
matter.
Specifically,
New
Jersey
is
proposing
the
following:

 
Revised
transportation
conformity
emission
budgets
consisting
of
a
1­
Hour
Ozone
and
Carbon
Monoxide
Budget
for
Northern
New
Jersey
and
an
amendment
to
the
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
General
Conformity
Budget;
 
New
transportation
conformity
emission
budgets
consisting
of
a
Fine
Particulate
Matter
Budget
for
Northern
New
Jersey;
 
The
second
ten­
year
Carbon
Monoxide
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
for
Camden
County
and
the
nine
not
classified
maintenance
areas;
and,
 
New
Jersey's
2002
periodic
emission
inventory.

1­
Hour
Ozone
2005/
2007
Budgets
and
Carbon
Monoxide
2007/
2014
Budgets
for
Northern
New
Jersey:

New
Jersey
is
proposing
updated
volatile
organic
compounds
(
VOCs)
and
oxides
of
nitrogen
(
NOx)
transportation
conformity
emission
budgets
that
incorporate
new
data
that
will
be
required
for
use
in
future
conformity
determinations
for
New
Jersey.
The
proposed
updates
to
the
budgets
are
being
proposed
because
of
significant
changes
in
planning
assumptions
involving
vehicle
miles
traveled
predictions,
vehicle
age
distributions,
and
the
latest
allocation
of
vehicle
miles
traveled
to
the
various
vehicle
types
in
the
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority
area.
An
analysis
was
performed
that
compares
these
updated
budgets
to
the
budgets
that
represented
the
attainment
demonstration
for
the
1­
hour
ozone
standard.
This
analysis
demonstrates
that
the
updated
budgets
continue
to
support
predicted
achievement
of
rate
of
progress
and
projected
attainment
of
the
1­
hour
ozone
NAAQS
for
the
New
Jersey
portion
of
the
New
York
City/
Northern
New
Jersey/
Long
Island
nonattainment
area
by
the
attainment
date
of
2007.

All
21
New
Jersey
counties
are
designated
as
moderate
nonattainment
for
the
8­
hour
ozone
NAAQS
by
the
United
States
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
USEPA).
The
1­
hour
ozone
NAAQS
was
revoked
on
June
15,
2005.
The
attainment
demonstration
SIP
for
the
8­
hour
ozone
NAAQS
is
not
due
until
June
2007.
The
USEPA
has
established
that
prior
to
the
establishment
of
8­
hour
budgets,
the
use
of
1­
hour
budgets
ensures
that
air
quality
progress
to
date
is
maintained.
The
USEPA
also
contends
that
even
after
the
1­
hour
NAAQS
was
revoked,
the
1­
hour
budgets
continue
to
be
part
of
a
nonattainment
area's
SIP
and
are
therefore
appropriate
to
use
as
proxies
for
the
8­
hour
standard.
1
The
updated
transportation
conformity
emission
budgets
are
provided
in
Table
ES1.
Table
ES2
contains
a
comparison
of
the
updated
transportation
conformity
emission
budgets
with
prior
1
Transportation
Conformity
Rule
Amendments
for
the
New
8­
Hour
Ozone
and
PM2.5
National
Ambient
Air
Quality
Standards
and
Miscellaneous
Revisions
for
Existing
Areas;
Transportation
Conformity
Rule
Amendments:
Response
to
Court
Decision
and
Additional
Rule
Changes;
Final
Rule,
69
Fed.
Reg.,
40026­
40027
(
July
1,
2004).
ix
budgets.
The
updated
budgets
supersede
the
prior
budgets
and
must
be
used
for
future
transportation
conformity
determinations
by
the
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority
Metropolitan
Planning
Organization
once
approved
by
the
USEPA.

Table
ES1
Proposed
Updated
Carbon
Monoxide
and
1­
Hour
Ozone
Transportation
Conformity
Emission
Budgets
Carbon
Monoxide
Emissions(
1)

(
tons
per
winter
day)
VOC
Emissions(
2)

(
tons
per
ozone
day)
NOx
Emissions(
2)

(
tons
per
ozone
day)
Transportation
Planning
Area
1997
2007
2014
2005
2007
2005
2007
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority
1,550.74
1,150.99
899.01
146.33
122.53
327.83
256.58
NOTES:
(
1)
For
Passaic,
Bergen,
Essex,
Hudson
and
Union
counties.
(
2)
For
all
counties
within
the
Metropolitan
Planning
Organization.

Table
ES2
Comparison
of
the
Proposed
Updated
Carbon
Monoxide
and
1­
Hour
Ozone
Transportation
Conformity
Emission
Budgets
with
Prior
Budgets
Carbon
Monoxide
Emissions(
1)

(
tons
per
winter
day)
VOC
Emissions(
2)

(
tons
per
ozone
day)
NOx
Emissions(
2)

(
tons
per
ozone
day)
Transportation
Planning
Area
Prior
or
Updated
1997
2007
2014
2005
2007
2005
2007
Prior
1,550.74
783.39
605.63
148.27
125.82
253.05
198.34
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority
Updated
Not
Updated
1,150.99
899.01
146.33
122.53
327.83
256.58
NOTES:
(
1)
For
Passaic,
Bergen,
Essex,
Hudson
and
Union
counties.
(
2)
For
all
counties
within
the
Metropolitan
Planning
Organization.

Transportation
conformity
emission
budgets
for
carbon
monoxide
are
updated
to
include
a
safety
margin
but
were
not
recalculated
to
include
the
latest
planning
assumptions.
This
proposed
SIP
revision
does
not
affect
any
of
the
planned
or
implemented
control
measures
for
carbon
monoxide,
VOCs,
and
NOx.
In
addition,
the
updated
budgets
do
not
result
in
backsliding
on
New
Jersey's
plans
to
address
the
1­
hour
ozone
NAAQS
and
maintain
attainment
of
the
carbon
monoxide
standard.
x
The
carbon
monoxide
budgets
were
updated
to
incorporate
the
"
margin
of
safety"
provisions
of
the
USEPA's
transportation
conformity
rule2.
The
safety
margin
is
the
difference
between
the
attainment
year
total
emissions
and
future
year
total
emissions.
This
safety
margin
was
applied
to
the
existing
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority
carbon
monoxide
budgets
for
2007
and
2014.

Actual
measured
carbon
monoxide
concentrations
have
been
steadily
decreasing
over
the
last
thirty
years
as
a
likely
consequence
of
improvements
in
motor
vehicle
emission
technology.
Onroad
mobile
sources
have
historically
contributed
the
largest
portion
of
the
carbon
monoxide
inventory
in
New
Jersey
relative
to
the
other
source
sectors.
The
last
time
the
carbon
monoxide
NAAQS
was
exceeded
in
New
Jersey
was
in
January
of
1995.
The
monitored
carbon
monoxide
levels
have
trended
downward
so
that
the
maximum
measured
values
are
currently
about
onehalf
of
the
NAAQS
level.

The
use
of
the
updated
budgets
for
transportation
conformity
determinations
will
continue
to
achieve
the
goal
of
the
maintenance
of
the
NAAQS
for
carbon
monoxide.
The
updates
to
the
carbon
monoxide
budgets
do
not
affect
the
conclusions
of
the
carbon
monoxide
maintenance
plan
for
the
New
Jersey
portion
of
the
New
York
City/
Northern
New
Jersey/
Long
Island
area.

McGuire
Air
Force
Base
General
Conformity
Budget
Amendment:

McGuire
Air
Force
Base
currently
has
a
1­
hour
ozone
general
conformity
budget.
As
noted
previously,
the
USEPA
revoked
the
1­
hour
ozone
standard
for
the
nation
on
June
15,
2005,
as
the
newly
established
8­
hour
ozone
standard
superseded
it.
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
has
agreed
to
live
within
its
1­
hour
ozone
budget
until
such
time
as
a
new
budget
is
established
under
the
8­
hour
ozone
standard,
with
one
condition.
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
requests
that
the
State
allow
it
to
reapportion
additional
VOC
reductions
from
its
VOC
budget
to
its
NOx
budget
to
accommodate
anticipated
mission
changes
for
the
McGuire
Air
Force
Base.
Specifically,
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
proposes
to
increase
its
existing
NOx
budget
by
450
tons
per
year
by
decreasing
its
VOC
budget
by
468
tons
per
year.
Previously,
USEPA
approved3
a
similar
reapportionment
at
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
in
2003.
The
VOC/
NOx
emission
ratio
(
1.04)
was
derived
from
the
1­
hour
ozone
attainment
demonstration
for
the
area.
Table
ES3
contains
updated
emission
budget
information
for
McGuire
Air
Force
Base.

Fine
Particulate
Matter
Transportation
Conformity
Budget
for
the
New
Jersey
Portion
of
the
New
York/
New
Jersey/
Long
Island/
Connecticut
Nonattainment
Area:

New
Jersey
is
proposing
to
establish
early
transportation
conformity
emission
budgets
for
directly
emitted
fine
particulate
matter
(
direct
PM2.5)
and
annual
NOx
(
a
PM2.5
precursor)
for
the
New
Jersey
portion
of
the
New
York/
New
Jersey/
Long
Island/
Connecticut
PM2.5
nonattainment
area.
The
USEPA
is
allowing
areas
to
establish
early
budgets
as
an
alternative
to
other
interim
conformity
tests
prior
to
submittal
of
the
PM2.5
attainment
demonstration
in
April
2008.
To
establish
an
early
budget,
an
area
must
meet
certain
criteria
defined
by
the
USEPA.
The
New
Jersey
portion
of
the
New
York/
New
Jersey/
Long
Island/
Connecticut
PM2.5
nonattainment
area
2
40
CFR
93.124
3
68
Fed.
Reg.,
43462­
43465
(
July
23,
2003).
xi
meets
the
criteria.
The
use
at
the
proposed
budget
is
expected
to
be
more
air
quality
constraining
than
the
choice
of
using
either
of
the
two
other
interim
conformity
tests.
Once
found
to
be
adequate,
these
early
PM2.5
budgets
must
be
used
by
the
Metropolitan
Planning
Organizations
during
the
interim
period
prior
to
the
establishment
of
PM2.5
budgets
with
the
PM2.5
attainment
demonstration
SIP.

Table
ES3
Emission
Budgets
for
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
Prior
Budget
Updated
Budget
to
Accommodate
Additional
Aircraft
VOC
(
Tons/
Year)
NOx
(
Tons/
Year)
VOC
(
Tons/
Year)
NOx
(
Tons/
Year)

1990
Baseline
1,112
1,038
1,112
1,038
1996
1,186
1,107
1,186
1,107
1999
1,223
1,142
1,223
1,142
2002
1,405
875
1,405
875
2005(
1)
1,198
1,084
730
1,534
NOTES:
(
1)
Budgets
updated
such
that
the
increase
in
NOx
is
offset
by
a
decrease
in
VOC.
Updated
2005
budgets
apply
to
2005
and
all
future
years
until
new
budgets
are
established
for
the
8­
hour
ozone
attainment
demonstration
The
early
transportation
conformity
emission
budgets
are
provided
in
Table
ES4.
The
early
budgets
must
be
used
for
future
transportation
conformity
determinations
by
the
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority
and
the
Delaware
Valley
Regional
Planning
Commission
Metropolitan
Planning
Organization
once
found
to
be
adequate
by
the
USEPA.
xii
Table
ES4
New
PM2.5
Transportation
Conformity
Emission
Budgets
Direct
PM2.5
Emissions(
1)

(
tons
per
year)
Annual
NOx
Emissions
(
tons
per
year)
Transportation
Planning
Area
2009
2009
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority(
2)
1,207
61,676
Delaware
Valley
Regional
Planning
Commission(
3)
89
4,328
NOTES:
(
1)
Direct
PM2.5
consists
of
the
sum
of:
SO4,
Organic
Carbon,
Elemental
Carbon,
particulate
Matter
from
gasoline
vehicles,
lead,
brake
particles,
and
tire
particles.
(
2)
For
Bergen,
Essex,
Hudson,
Middlesex,
Monmouth,
Morris,
Passaic,
Somerset
and
Union
Counties.
(
3)
For
Mercer
County.

Carbon
Monoxide
Limited
Maintenance
Plan:

According
to
42
U.
S.
C.
§
7505a(
b)
New
Jersey
is
proposing
the
second
ten­
year
maintenance
plans
for
ten
of
its
eleven
carbon
monoxide
maintenance
areas
whose
initial
maintenance
plans
expire
in
2007.
The
ten
maintenance
areas
are:

1)
The
Camden
County
Carbon
Monoxide
Maintenance
Area
 
covering
all
of
Camden
County;
and,
2)
The
Nine
Not­
Classified
Carbon
Monoxide
Maintenance
Areas
 
covering
the
City
of
Atlantic
City
(
in
Atlantic
County),
the
City
of
Burlington
(
in
Burlington
County),
the
Borough
of
Freehold
(
in
Monmouth
County),
the
Town
of
Morristown
(
in
Morris
County),
the
Borough
of
Penns
Grove
(
in
Salem
County),
the
City
of
Perth
Amboy
(
in
Middlesex
County),
the
Borough
of
Somerville
(
in
Somerset
County),
the
Toms
River
Area
(
in
Ocean
County),
and
the
City
of
Trenton
(
in
Mercer
County).

In
an
effort
to
consolidate
the
preparation
of
these
second
ten­
year
maintenance
plans,
the
State
is
proposing
a
consolidated
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
encompassing
all
ten
(
10)
areas,
covering
the
second
ten­
year
maintenance
period.
New
Jersey's
eleventh
carbon
monoxide
maintenance
area,
encompassing
four
counties
and
part
of
a
fifth
county
in
the
Northeastern
portion
of
the
State,
has
an
initial
maintenance
plan
that
does
not
expire
until
2014.
As
such,
this
area
is
not
required
and
not
able
to
submit
a
second
ten­
year
plan
until
around
2012.

This
proposed
carbon
monoxide
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
demonstrates
that
the
New
Jersey
carbon
monoxide
maintenance
areas
continue
to
be
in
attainment
of
the
health­
based
NAAQS
for
carbon
monoxide
and
will
continue
to
be
in
attainment
for
another
ten
(
10)
years.
In
general,
monitoring
data
for
these
areas
show
a
trend
of
decreasing
carbon
monoxide
concentrations
in
xiii
the
air
over
the
past
decade.
These
improvements
are
due
to
permanent
and
enforceable
measures
that
the
state
and
federal
government
have
implemented,
and
not
necessarily
attributable
to
favorable
meteorology
or
other
factors.
Despite
the
growth
in
economic
activity,
vehicle
miles
traveled,
and
population
that
have
and
are
expected
to
occur,
the
maintenance
areas
are
expected
to
meet
the
health­
based
carbon
monoxide
NAAQS
through
the
remainder
of
the
their
first
ten­
tear
maintenance
plans
and
all
of
the
second
ten­
year
maintenance
plans.

Finally,
in
compliance
with
the
USEPA's
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
Guidance,
4
the
emission
budgets
in
these
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
areas
are
now
treated
as
not
constraining
for
purposes
of
transportation
conformity.
This
is
true
for
the
length
of
the
maintenance
periods
because
it
is
unreasonable
to
expect
that
the
area
would
experience
so
much
growth
in
that
period
that
a
violation
of
the
carbon
monoxide
NAAQS
would
result.
As
such,
once
a
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
has
been
approved
for
these
areas,
it
will
no
longer
be
necessary
for
the
Metropolitan
Planning
Organizations
to
perform
numerical
regional
analyses
to
demonstrate
transportation
conformity
for
Transportation
Plans
and
Transportation
Improvement
Programs.
However,
project­
level
carbon
monoxide
evaluation
of
transportation
projects
(
project­
level
conformity)
still
needs
to
be
performed
in
areas
with
approved
Limited
Maintenance
Plans.

2002
Periodic
Emission
Inventory:

42
U.
S.
C.
§
7410(
a)(
2)(
F)
requires
the
submission
by
states
to
the
USEPA
of
periodic
reports
on
the
nature
and
amounts
of
emissions
and
emissions
related
data.
In
2002,
the
USEPA
promulgated
the
Consolidated
Emission
Reporting
Rule
at
40
CFR
51,
Subpart
A.
As
indicated
by
its
name,
this
rule
"
consolidated"
the
various
emissions
reporting
requirements
that
already
had
established
for
existing
NAAQS
(
e.
g.,
ozone
(
VOC
and
NOx),
carbon
monoxide,
etc.)
into
one
location
within
the
Code
of
Federal
Regulations.
In
addition,
the
Consolidated
Emission
Reporting
Rule:

1)
Established
new
reporting
requirements
related
to
PM2.5,
its
potential
precursors
(
ammonia
(
NH3),
oxides
of
sulfur
(
SOx),
NOx
and
VOC),
and
regional
haze;
2)
Established
new
requirements
for
the
statewide
reporting
of
area
source
and
mobile
source
emissions;
and,
3)
Required
two
types
of
inventories
(
annual
inventories
and
three
year
cycle
inventories).

New
Jersey's
proposed
2002
Periodic
Emission
Inventory
meets
the
new
Consolidated
Emission
Reporting
Rule
requirements
and
establishes
2002
as
the
base
year
for
future
attainment
planning
purposes
with
respect
to
8­
hour
ozone,
PM2.5
and
regional
haze,
as
required
by
the
USEPA.
This
proposed
inventory
is
a
compilation
of
the
emissions
from
sources
of
biogenic
(
natural)
and
anthropogenic
(
human­
made)
VOC,
NOx,
carbon
monoxide,
particulate
matter
less
than
10
micrometers
in
diameter
(
PM10),
PM2.5,
sulfur
dioxide
(
SO2)
5
and
ammonia
(
NH3)
in
the
outdoor
4
USEPA,
Memorandum
from
Lydia
Wegman
(
OAQPS)
to
EPA
Regional
Air
Directors,
"
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
Option
for
Moderate
PM10
Nonattainment
Areas,"
August
21,
2001.
5
SO2
has
been
reported
in
the
inventory
instead
of
SOx
as
required
in
the
Consolidated
Emissions
Reporting
Rule
because
the
USEPA
MOBILE
and
NON­
ROAD
models
and
the
majority
of
USEPA
guidance
on
emission
factors
is
based
on
SO2,
not
SOx.
In
addition,
the
USEPA
National
Emissions
Inventory
reports
SO2.
xiv
air.
The
sources
are
divided
into
five
sectors
and
each
making
up
one
component
of
the
inventory:
point
sources,
area
(
nonpoint)
sources,
onroad
sources,
nonroad
sources,
and
biogenic
sources.

The
pie
charts
on
the
following
pages
show
the
major
air
contaminants
estimated
within
the
2002
Emissions
Inventory.
As
can
be
seen
from
these
charts,
VOC
emissions
are
occurring
from
all
sectors
of
the
inventory
with
no
sector
having
a
much
more
predominant
role
than
the
others.
On­
Road
mobile
sources
predominate
the
NOx
and
carbon
monoxide
emissions
and
point
sources
predominate
the
sulfur
dioxide
emissions.
Area
sources
predominate
the
releases
of
ammonia
and
particulate
matter
(
PM2.5
and
PM10).

2002
VOC­
470,689
Tons
Per
Year
Point
6%

Area
27%

Onroad
23%
Nonroad
15%
Biogenic
29%
2002
VOC
­
1,350
Tons
Per
Day
Point
8%

Area
27%

Onroad
20%
Nonroad
16%
Biogenic
29%

2002
NOx
­
352,968
Tons
Per
Year
Point
15%
Area
8%

Onroad
58%
Nonroad
19%
Biogenic
0%
2002
NOx
­
1,110
Tons
Per
Day
Point
25%

Area
3%

Onroad
51%
Nonroad
21%
Biogenic
0%
xv
2002
NOx
­
352,968
Tons
Per
Year
Point
15%
Area
8%

Onroad
58%
Nonroad
19%
Biogenic
0%
2002
NOx
­
1,110
Tons
Per
Day
Point
25%

Area
3%

Onroad
51%
Nonroad
21%
Biogenic
0%
2002
Carbon
Monoxide
2,206,719
Tons
Per
Year
Point
1%

Area
4%

Onroad
64%
Nonroad
30%
Biogenic
1%
2002
Carbon
Monoxide
5,544
Tons
Per
Day
Point
2%

Area
1%

Onroad
51%
Nonroad
45%
Biogenic
1%

2002
Ammonia
25,514
Tons
Per
Year
Point
0%
Area
31%

Onroad
29%
Nonroad
4%
Biogenic
36%
2002
PM
2.5
­
30,381
Tons
Per
Year
Point
16%

Area
54%
Onroad
11%
Nonroad
19%
Biogenic
0%
2002
PM10
­
41,538
Tons
Per
Year
Point
13%

Area
60%
Onroad
11%
Nonroad
16%
Biogenic
0%

2002
SO2
­
94,672
Tons
Per
Year
Point
65%
Area
11%
Onroad
6%
Nonroad
18%
Biogenic
0%
1
I.
Introduction
The
Clean
Air
Act
provides
for
states
to
submit
revisions
to
their
State
Implementation
Plans
(
SIP)
whenever
states'
programs
are
modified
from
the
existing
SIP.
This
document
proposes
the
following
revisions
to
the
existing
New
Jersey
SIP:
6
 
Revised
transportation
conformity
emission
budgets
for
ozone
and
carbon
monoxide
for
northern
New
Jersey;
 
Revised
general
conformity
budget
for
McGuire
Air
Force
Base;
 
New
transportation
conformity
budget
for
fine
particulate
matter,
PM2.5,
for
northern
New
Jersey;
 
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
for
carbon
monoxide
for
Camden
County
and
the
nine
notclassified
areas;
 
New
Jersey's
2002
Periodic
Emission
Inventory.

The
USEPA
requires7
the
2002
Periodic
Emission
Inventory
to
be
submitted
as
a
SIP
revision
because
it
is
the
foundation
for
the
planning
to
attain
the
8­
hour
ozone
and
fine
particulate
matter
health
standards,
and
for
the
regional
haze
SIP.

Summaries
of
the
history
of
New
Jersey's
SIPs
for
carbon
monoxide
and
ozone
are
presented
in
Appendix
A
and
Appendix
B,
respectively.

II.
Conformity
Emission
Budgets
New
Jersey
is
proposing
updating
the
existing
transportation
conformity
VOC,
NOx
and
CO
emission
budgets
and
proposing
early
transportation
conformity
emission
budgets
for
direct
PM2.5
and
annual
NOx
(
a
PM2.5
precursor)
for
the
New
Jersey
portion
of
the
New
York/
New
Jersey/
Long
Island/
Connecticut
PM2.5
nonattainment
Area.
New
Jersey
is
also
proposing
updates
to
the
existing
general
conformity
budgets
for
McGuire
Air
Force
Base.

The
updates
to
the
transportation
conformity
emission
budgets
for
VOCs
and
NOx
are
being
proposed
to
reflect
the
most
recent
predictions
of
vehicle
miles
traveled,
vehicle
age
distributions,
and
the
latest
allocation
of
vehicles
miles
traveled
to
the
various
vehicle
types.
Updates
to
the
transportation
conformity
emission
budgets
for
carbon
monoxide
are
being
proposed
to
include
a
safety
margin.
These
proposed
updated
budgets
do
not
affect
any
of
the
planned
or
implemented
control
measures
for
carbon
monoxide,
VOCs,
or
NOx.
In
addition,
the
updated
budgets
do
not
result
in
backsliding
on
New
Jersey's
plans
to
address
the
1­
hour
ozone
NAAQS
and
maintain
attainment
of
the
carbon
monoxide
standard.

Early
budgets
to
address
the
PM2.5
NAAQS
are
provided
for
direct
PM2.5
and
annual
NOx
for
the
New
Jersey
portion
of
the
New
York
City/
Northern
New
Jersey/
Long
Island/
Connecticut
nonattainment
area.
The
attainment
demonstration
SIP
for
the
PM2.5
NAAQS
is
not
due
until
April
2008.
Once
found
to
be
adequate,
these
early
PM2.5
budgets
must
be
used
by
the
6
42
U.
S.
C.
§
7410
7
42
U.
S.
C.
§
7401
2
Metropolitan
Planning
Organizations
during
the
interim
period
prior
to
the
establishment
of
PM2.5
budgets
with
the
PM2.5
attainment
demonstration
SIP.
The
USEPA
is
allowing
areas
to
establish
early
budgets
as
an
alternative
to
other
interim
conformity
tests
prior
to
submittal
of
the
PM2.5
attainment
demonstration
in
April
2008.

New
Jersey
is
proposing
changes
in
the
general
conformity
budget
for
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
based
on
projected
future
increases
NOx
budget
needs.
The
current
and
projected
VOC
emissions
at
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
are
well
below
budget
levels.
Therefore,
this
request
for
an
increase
in
the
NOx
budget
will
be
offset
by
a
decrease
in
their
VOC
budget.

A.
Background
42
U.
S.
C.
§
7506
states
"
no
department,
agency,
or
instrumentality
of
the
federal
government
shall
engage
in,
support
in
any
way,
or
provide
financial
assistance
for,
or
approve,
any
activity
which
does
not
conform
to
an
approved
or
promulgated
state
implementation
plan.
No
Metropolitan
Planning
Organization
designated
under
section
134
of
Title
23,
shall
give
its
approval
to
any
project,
program,
or
plan
which
does
not
conform
to
an
approved
or
promulgated
state
implementation
plan."
These
requirements
are
interpreted
by
the
USEPA
to
apply
to
maintenance
as
well
as
nonattainment
areas.
8
"
Conformity
to
an
implementation
plan"
means
conforming
to
the
implementation
plan's
purpose
of
eliminating
or
reducing
the
severity
and
number
of
violations
of
the
health­
based
NAAQS
and
achieving
expeditious
attainment
of
such
standards.
In
order
for
a
proposed
transportation
activity
to
conform
to
the
SIP,
the
Clean
Air
Act9
specifies
that
such
activity
will
not:

 
Cause
or
contribute
to
any
new
violation
of
any
standard
in
any
area;
 
Increase
the
frequency
or
severity
of
any
existing
violation
of
any
standard
in
any
area;
or,
 
Delay
timely
attainment
of
any
standard
or
any
required
interim
emission
reductions
or
any
other
milestones
in
any
area.

The
Federal
Transportation
Conformity
Rule
(
40
CFR
93.100­
160)
provides
the
process
by
which
the
air
quality
impact
of
transportation
plans,
transportation
improvement
programs,
and
projects
will
be
analyzed.
The
agency
preparing
plans
(
twenty
or
more
years),
transportation
improvement
programs
(
at
least
four
years),
or
approving
a
transportation
project
must
analyze
the
emissions
expected
from
such
a
proposal
in
accordance
with
the
Transportation
Conformity
Rule.
10
For
the
purposes
of
transportation
conformity,
the
emission
budget
is
that
portion
of
the
total
8
USEPA,
Memorandum
from
John
Calcagni,
Director,
Air
Quality
Management
Division,
to
Regional
Air
Directors,
"
Procedures
for
Processing
Requests
to
Redesignate
Areas
to
Attainment,"
September
4,
1992,
page
6.
9
42
U.
S.
C.
§
7506(
c)(
1)
10
For
New
Jersey
such
plans
are
prepared
by
three
Metropolitan
Planning
Organizations
(
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority,
South
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Organization
and
Delaware
Valley
Regional
Planning
Commission).
3
allowable
emissions
in
the
SIP
emission
inventory
that
is
allocated
to
onroad
vehicles.
The
projected
emissions
from
a
plan,
transportation
improvement
program,
or
project,
estimated
in
accordance
with
the
Transportation
Conformity
Rule,
may
not
exceed
the
motor
vehicle
emissions
budget
contained
in
the
appropriate
SIP.
Emissions
in
years
for
which
no
motor
vehicle
emissions
budgets
are
specifically
established
must
be
less
than
or
equal
to
the
motor
vehicle
emissions
budget
established
for
the
most
recent
prior
year.

B.
Revised
Budgets
This
section
discusses
the
proposed
updates
to
the
existing
transportation
conformity
budgets
for
certain
areas
within
the
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority
and
the
proposed
updates
to
the
existing
general
conformity
budgets
for
McGuire
Air
Force
Base.

1.
1­
Hour
Ozone
and
a
Carbon
Monoxide
Budgets
for
Northern
New
Jersey
The
Metropolitan
Planning
Organizations
are
required
to
use
the
latest
planning
assumptions
pursuant
to
the
USEPA
Transportation
Conformity
Rule
(
40
CFR
93.100­
160).
There
are
three
Metropolitan
Planning
Organizations
in
New
Jersey,
Figure
I.
The
proposed
budgets
described
in
this
section
are
for
the
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority.

The
proposed
transportation
conformity
emission
budgets
for
VOCs
and
NOx
are
updated
to
reflect
the
most
recent
Highway
Performance
Monitoring
System
reconciliation
of
vehicle
miles
traveled
updated
(
2005),
vehicle
age
distributions,
and
the
latest
allocation
of
vehicle
miles
traveled
to
the
various
vehicle
types.
The
proposed
transportation
conformity
emission
budgets
for
carbon
monoxide
are
updated
to
include
a
safety
margin
and
are
not
updated
to
include
the
latest
planning
assumptions.
The
proposed
budgets
do
not
affect
any
of
the
planned
or
implemented
control
measures
for
carbon
monoxide,
VOCs,
and
NOx.
In
addition,
the
updated
budgets
do
not
indicate
a
need
for
any
additional
control
measures
for
New
Jersey
to
maintain
attainment
of
the
carbon
monoxide
NAAQS
or
reach
attainment
of
the
1­
hour
ozone
NAAQS.
Please
note:
The
attainment
demonstration
SIP
for
the
8­
hour
ozone
NAAQS
is
not
due
until
June
2007.
Prior
to
approval
of
a
SIP
for
the
8­
hour
ozone
NAAQS,
compliance
with
the
1­
hour
ozone
NAAQS
SIP
continues
to
be
required
with
regard
to
Transportation
Conformity.
11
The
updated
transportation
conformity
emission
budgets
are
provided
in
Table
I.
Table
II
contains
a
comparison
of
the
updated
transportation
conformity
emission
budgets
with
prior
budgets.
The
updated
budgets
supersede
the
prior
budgets
and
should
be
used
for
future
transportation
conformity
determinations
by
the
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority
once
approved
by
the
USEPA.

11
Transportation
Conformity
Rule
Amendments
for
the
New
8­
Hour
Ozone
and
PM2.5
National
Ambient
Air
Quality
Standards
and
Miscellaneous
Revisions
for
Existing
Areas;
Transportation
Conformity
Rule
Amendments:
Response
to
Court
Decision
and
Additional
Rule
Changes;
Final
Rule,
69
Fed.
Reg.,
40026­
40027
(
July
1,
2004).
4
Figure
I
Metropolitan
Planning
Organizations
in
New
Jersey
Delaware
Valley
Regional
Planning
Commission
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority
South
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Organization
5
Table
I
Proposed
Updated
Transportation
Conformity
Emission
Budgets
Carbon
Monoxide
Emissions(
1)

(
tons
per
winter
day)
VOC
Emissions(
2)

(
tons
per
ozone
day)
NOx
Emissions(
2)

(
tons
per
ozone
day)
Transportation
Planning
Area
1997
2007
2014
2005
2007
2005
2007
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority
1,550.74
1,150
899
146.33
122.53
327.83
256.58
NOTES:
(
1)
For
Passaic,
Bergen,
Essex,
Hudson
and
Union
counties.
(
2)
For
all
counties
within
the
Metropolitan
Planning
Organization.

Table
II
Comparison
of
the
Proposed
Updated
Transportation
Conformity
Emission
Budgets
with
Prior
Budgets
Carbon
Monoxide
Emissions(
1)

(
tons
per
winter
day)
VOC
Emissions(
2)

(
tons
per
ozone
day)
NOx
Emissions(
2)

(
tons
per
ozone
day)
Transportation
Planning
Area
Prior
or
Updated
1997
2007
2014
2005
2007
2005
2007
Prior
1,550.74
783.39
605.63
148.27
125.82
253.05
198.34
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority
Updated(
3)
Not
Updated
1,150
899
146.33
122.53
327.83
256.58
NOTES:
(
1)
For
Passaic,
Bergen,
Essex,
Hudson
and
Union
counties.
(
2)
For
all
counties
within
the
Metropolitan
Planning
Organization.
(
3)
Even
though
a
number
of
the
updated
budgets
are
greater
that
the
prior
budgets,
the
maintenance
SIP
for
carbon
monoxide
continues
to
demonstrate
maintenance
of
the
NAAQS
and
the
attainment
SIP
for
ozone
continues
to
demonstrate
attainment
of
the
NAAQS
as
discussed
in
the
subsequent
subsections
of
the
text.

Carbon
Monoxide
Budgets
The
carbon
monoxide
budgets
for
the
five
New
Jersey
counties
in
the
New
York
City/
Northern
New
Jersey/
Long
Island
carbon
monoxide
maintenance
area
are
proposed
to
be
updated
to
6
incorporate
the
"
margin
of
safety"
provisions
of
the
USEPA's
transportation
conformity
rule.
12
The
safety
margin
is
the
difference
between
the
attainment
year
total
emissions
and
future
year
total
emissions.
The
rule13
indicates
that
when
the
projected
emissions
from
all
sources
are
less
than
the
total
emissions
that
would
be
consistent
with
attainment,
the
SIP
may
explicitly
quantify
a
safety
margin
and
include
some
or
all
of
it
in
the
motor
vehicle
emission
budget
for
purposes
of
conformity.
Table
III
shows
the
1996
attainment
emission
inventory
and
future
projection
emission
inventories.
Tables
I
and
II
include
the
margins
of
safety.

Note
that
even
though
only
the
municipalities
of
Clifton,
Passaic,
and
Paterson
in
Passaic
County
are
in
the
maintenance
area,
the
entire
Passaic
County
is
included
in
the
area
budget
because
this
is
how
prior
budgets
were
established.
These
inventories
are
from
the
2002
USEPA
approved
maintenance
plan.
14
Table
IV
and
Table
V
show
the
calculation
of
the
updated
2007
and
2014
budgets,
respectively.
It
should
be
noted
that
1996
statewide
levels
of
carbon
monoxide
were
measured
to
be
only
about
75
percent
(
maximum
second
highest
8­
hour
average)
of
the
carbon
monoxide
8­
hour
NAAQS
monitored
in
the
area
as
shown
in
Figure
II.
Also,
for
monitors
within
the
New
Jersey
portion
of
the
New
York/
New
Jersey/
Long
Island
carbon
monoxide
maintenance
area,
the
maximum
second
highest
8­
hour
average
carbon
monoxide
levels
were
all
below
7.0
parts
per
million
(
NAAQS
is
9.0
parts
per
million).
Therefore,
the
1996
inventory
represents
carbon
monoxide
emission
levels
that
are
likely
significantly
lower
than
the
minimum
levels
required
to
achieve
attainment
of
the
NAAQS
resulting
in
conservatively
lower
carbon
monoxide
budgets.
Additional
information
concerning
historical
measurements
of
carbon
monoxide
levels
in
New
Jersey
are
provided
in
the
carbon
monoxide
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
section
of
this
SIP
revision,
Section
III.
Table
III
Maintenance
Plan
Inventories
for
the
New
Jersey
Portion
of
the
New
York
City/
Northern
New
Jersey/
Long
Island
Carbon
Monoxide
Nonattainment
Area
New
Jersey
Portion
of
the
New
York
City/
Northern
New
Jersey/
Long
Island
Carbon
Monoxide
Area
­
Carbon
Monoxide
Emissions
in
Tons
Per
Winter
Season
Day
County
1996
(
Attainment
Year)
2007
2014
Bergen
455.29
350.56
381.01
Essex
287.10
209.08
222.18
Hudson
183.64
118.20
130.76
Passaic
220.17
163.46
171.53
Union
219.11
156.41
166.45
Totals
1,365.31
997.71
1,071.93
12
40
CFR
93.124
13
Op
cit,
note
12.
14
67
Fed.
Reg.,
54577
(
August
23,
2002).
7
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Year
Parts
Per
Million
(
ppm)
Maximum
Average
Minimum
Health
Standard
Figure
II
Carbon
Monoxide
Statewide
Air
Quality,
1975­
2004
2nd
Highest
8­
Hour
Average
2007
Safety
Margin
Calculation
1365.31
tons
per
day
(
1996
total
emissions)
 
997.71
tons
per
day
(
2007
total
emissions)
=
367.60
tons
per
day
(
2007
margin
of
safety)

367.60
tons
per
day
+
783.39
tons
per
day
(
existing
2007
carbon
monoxide
budget)
=
1150.99
tons
per
day
(
onroad
emission
budget
for
2007
including
the
margin
of
safety)

Table
IV
2007
Margin
of
Safety
Calculation
Year
Total
Emissions
1996
Total
Emissions
2007
2007
Margin
of
Safety
Prior
2007
budget
Updated
2007
budget
Budget
(
tons/
day)
1365.31
997.71
367.60
783.39
1150.99
2014
Safety
Margin
Calculation
1365.31
tons
per
day
(
1996
total
emissions)
 
1071.93
tons
per
day
(
2014
total
emissions)
=
293.38
tons
per
day
(
2014
margin
of
safety)
293.38
tons
per
day
+
605.63
tons
per
day
(
existing
2014
carbon
monoxide
budget)
=
899.01
tons
per
day
(
onroad
emission
budget
for
2014
including
the
margin
of
safety)
8
Table
V
2014
Margin
of
Safety
Calculation
Year
Total
Emissions
1996
Total
Emissions
2014
2014
Margin
of
Safety
Prior
2014
budget
Updated
2014
budget
Budget
(
tons/
day)
1365.31
1071.93
293.38
605.63
899.01
Ozone
Budgets
 
VOC/
NOx
The
United
States
Department
of
Transportation
(
USDOT)
and
the
USEPA
guidance
strongly
recommend
five
year
updates
to
planning
assumptions.
15
The
new
planning
assumptions
involve
updates
to
the
vehicle
miles
traveled
adjustment
files
and
the
vehicle
miles
traveled
fractions
assigned
to
the
various
vehicle
types
planning
assumptions.
These
vehicle
miles
traveled
adjustment
files
are
used
to
modify
travel
demand
model
predicted
vehicle
miles
traveled
to
match
the
vehicle
miles
traveled
reported
in
the
Highway
Performance
Monitoring
System.
The
use
of
updated
predicted
levels
of
vehicle
miles
traveled
and
an
updated
allocation
of
vehicle
miles
traveled
between
the
various
vehicle
types
for
the
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority
region
caused
VOC
and
NOx
emission
predictions
to
increase
by
amounts
greater
than
can
be
reduced
by
the
Metropolitan
Planning
Organization
changing
transportation
projects.
An
additional
change
in
planning
assumptions
was
an
update
of
the
vehicle
age
distribution
for
light
duty
gasoline
cars
and
trucks
that
had
a
net
effect
of
generally
reducing
the
age
of
these
vehicle
classes.
This
caused
significant
reductions
in
the
forecasting
of
both
VOC
and
NOx
emissions
because
vehicle
emission
standards
become
more
stringent
over
time.

The
overall
result
of
all
planning
assumption
changes
was
a
reduction
in
the
VOC
budgets
but
an
increase
in
the
NOx
budgets.
The
changes
in
the
budgets
are
less
than
the
amounts
that
would
cause
New
Jersey
emissions
to
no
longer
support
predicted
achievement
of
projected
attainment
of
the
1­
hour
ozone
NAAQS
by
the
attainment
date
as
shown
in
Section
II.
B.
1.
i.
b.
Even
though
the
1­
hour
ozone
standard
is
revoked,
the
USEPA
requires
the
1­
hour
ozone
budgets
to
be
used
until
the
8­
hour
ozone
standard
budgets
are
established
as
part
of
the
attainment
demonstration
due
in
2007.
The
computer
files
used
to
generate
the
updated
VOC
and
NOx
budgets
are
contained
in
Appendix
C.

The
budgets
for
Ocean
County
are
provided
in
Appendix
C
where
breakouts
by
county
are
reported.
The
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority
needs
to
breakout
Ocean
County
in
its
conformity
determinations
because
it
is
part
of
the
Philadelphia/
Wilmington/
Atlantic
City
8­
hour
ozone
nonattainment
area
while
the
other
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority
counties
are
part
of
the
New
York
City/
Northern
New
Jersey/
Long
Island
8­
hour
ozone
nonattainment
area.

15
USEPA
and
U.
S.
Department
of
Transportation,
Memorandum
on
"
Use
of
Latest
Planning
Assumptions
in
Conformity
Determinations,"
January
18,
2001.
9
i.
Effect
of
Updated
Transportation
Conformity
Emission
Budgets
on
the
Carbon
Monoxide
Maintenance
Plans
Actual
measured
carbon
monoxide
concentrations
have
been
steadily
decreasing
over
the
last
thirty
years
as
a
likely
consequence
of
improvements
in
motor
vehicle
emission
technology.
Onroad
mobile
sources
have
historically
contributed
the
largest
portion
of
the
carbon
monoxide
inventory
in
New
Jersey
relative
to
the
other
source
sectors.
The
last
time
the
carbon
monoxide
NAAQS
was
exceeded
in
New
Jersey
was
in
January
of
1995.
The
monitored
carbon
monoxide
levels
have
trended
downward
so
that
the
maximum
measured
values
are
currently
about
onehalf
of
the
NAAQS
level
as
shown
in
Figure
II.

Prior
and
proposed
updated
carbon
monoxide
budgets
for
the
New
Jersey
portion
of
the
New
York
City/
Northern
New
Jersey/
Long
Island
carbon
monoxide
maintenance
area
were
provided
in
Table
II.
The
only
revision
performed
to
the
prior
carbon
monoxide
budgets
was
the
inclusion
of
safety
margins
calculated
from
the
USEPA
approved
maintenance
plan.
Safety
margins
were
incorporated
so
that
the
updated
carbon
monoxide
transportation
conformity
emission
budgets
represent
constraints
on
emissions
from
onroad
sources
that
will
maintain
attainment
of
the
carbon
monoxide
NAAQS
without
being
overly
restrictive
of
the
transportation
project
planning
process.
The
updates
to
the
carbon
monoxide
budgets
do
not
affect
the
conclusions
of
the
carbon
monoxide
maintenance
plan
for
the
New
York
City/
Northern
New
Jersey/
Long
Island
area
because
they
were
performed
using
the
inventory
estimates
from
that
plan.

ii.
Effect
of
Updated
Transportation
Conformity
Emission
Budgets
on
the
Ozone
Attainment
Demonstration
It
is
necessary
to
assess
the
impacts
on
the
1­
hour
ozone
SIP
when
the
1­
hour
budgets
are
updated
to
ensure
that
air
quality
progress
is
maintained.
In
order
to
perform
this
comparison,
the
State's
attainment
demonstration
and
the
USEPA's
subsequent
re­
analyses
of
the
attainment
demonstration
were
examined
in
order
to
extract
mobile
onroad
inventories
which
best
represent
conditions
in
both
the
base
year
and
the
attainment
year.
Inventories
for
both
of
these
years
are
needed
because
the
weight
of
evidence
method
was
used
to
demonstrate
attainment.
A
detailed
description
of
the
weight
of
evidence
method
is
available
in
the
2003
MOBILE6
SIP
revision.
16
The
determination
of
whether
or
not
attainment
is
still
demonstrated
depends
on
the
relative
reduction
of
the
ozone
precursors
between
the
base
year
and
the
attainment
year.
If
these
relative
reductions
with
the
updated
inventories
(
consistent
with
the
updated
budgets)
are
equal
to
or
greater
than
the
relative
reductions
with
the
previous
inventories
(
representative
of
the
attainment
demonstrations),
then
attainment
continues
to
be
demonstrated.

Inventories
from
the
recent
Rate
of
Progress
SIP17
were
used
to
determine
the
required
percent
reduction
in
ozone
precursors
in
order
to
achieve
attainment
by
the
attainment
date
of
2007.
The
onroad
mobile
source
inventories
from
the
Rate
of
Progress
SIP
are
used
for
this
attainment
16
NJDEP,
SIP
Revision
for
the
Attainment
and
Maintenance
of
the
Ozone
NAAQS,
New
Jersey
Revised
Motor
Vehicle
Emission
Inventories
and
Transportation
Conformity
Budgets
Using
the
MOBILE6
Model,
April
4,
2003.
17
NJDEP,
State
Implementation
Plan
revision
for
the
Attainment
and
Maintenance
of
the
Ozone
National
Ambient
Air
Quality
Standard,
New
Jersey
1996
Actual
Emission
Inventory
and
Rate
of
Progress
(
ROP)
Plans
for
2002,
2005
and
2007,
March
31,
2001.
10
analysis
because
they
are
the
most
recent
SIP­
quality
inventories
prepared
that
include
essentially
all
of
the
control
measures
anticipated
for
the
areas
to
achieve
attainment.
In
addition,
the
Rate
of
Progress
SIP
inventories
were
prepared
for
the
1996
base
year
as
well
as
the
attainment
year
for
the
nonattainment
area.
These
inventories
are
the
best
available
representations
of
the
base
year
and
attainment
year
inventories
that
formed
the
basis
for
the
1­
hour
ozone
attainment
demonstration
so
they
are
the
appropriate
inventories
to
use
for
this
attainment
analysis.

The
results
of
the
comparisons
between
the
previous
inventories
(
from
the
Rate
of
Progress
SIP)
and
the
updated
inventories
are
summarized
in
Table
VI,
which
presents
the
relative
reductions
(
expressed
as
percent
reductions)
in
onroad
mobile
source
ozone
precursor
inventories
between
the
base
year
and
the
attainment
year.
The
differences
in
percent
reductions
are
shown
between
the
previous
inventories
and
the
updated
inventories.
The
updated
inventories
for
1996
were
the
same
as
those
established
in
the
2003
MOBILE6
SIP
except
that
the
updated
vehicle
miles
traveled­
by­
vehicle­
type
file
was
used.
18
The
updated
vehicle
miles
traveled­
by 
vehicle­
type
data
was
used
for
both
the
base
year
and
projection
year
runs
because
this
change
in
planning
assumptions
represents
an
improvement
in
the
methodology
of
estimating
local
conditions
as
opposed
to
a
change
in
the
actual
conditions.
This
contrasts
with
the
update
to
the
vehicle
miles
traveled
adjustment
and
vehicle
age
distribution
data
that
only
applies
to
projection
year
runs
and
is
not
used
for
the
1996
run.

As
a
result
of
the
use
of
the
weight
of
evidence
method
for
demonstration
of
attainment,
increases
in
percent
reductions
mean
that
the
updated
inventories
predict
lower
ozone
precursor
emissions
in
the
attainment
year
relative
to
the
base
year.
Similarly,
decreases
in
percent
reductions
mean
that
the
updated
inventories
predict
higher
ozone
precursor
emissions
in
the
attainment
year
relative
to
the
base
year.
In
Table
VI,
the
magnitude
that
the
ozone
precursor
emissions
are
lower
or
higher
are
represented
by
the
calculated
"
increase"
or
"
decrease",
respectively.

18
NJDEP.
Final
State
Implementation
Plan
Revision
for
the
Attainment
and
Maintenance
of
the
Ozone
National
Ambient
Air
Quality
Standard
(
NAAQS),
New
Jersey
Revised
Motor
Vehicle
Emission
Inventories
and
Transportation
Conformity
Budgets
Using
MOBILE6
Model,
2003.
11
Table
VI
Comparison
of
the
Onroad
Previous
Inventories
to
the
Updated
Onroad
Inventories
(
Tons
Per
Ozone
Day
Unless
Designated
Otherwise)

New
Jersey
Portion
of
the
New
York
City/
Northern
New
Jersey/
Long
Island
Area(
1)

­
2007
Attainment
Year
­

VOC
NOx
(
1)
Previous
Inventory
­
1996
(
2)
Previous
Inventory
­
Attainment
Year
206.52
89.82
302.92
165.11
(
3)
Previous
Reductions
[(
1)
 
(
2)]
(
4)
Previous
%
Reductions
[(
3)
/
(
1)
x
100%]
116.70
56.51%
137.81
45.49%
(
5)
Updated
­
1996
(
6)
Updated
­
Attainment
Year
306.50
119.29
439.88
245.87
(
7)
Updated
­
Reductions
[(
5)
 
(
6)]
(
8)
Updated
­
%
Reductions
[(
7)
/
(
5)
x
100%]
187.21
61.08%
194.01
44.11%
(
9)
Difference
in
%
Reductions
[(
8)
 
(
4)]
Note
that
positive
values
represent
increases
in
percent
reductions.
+
4.57%
­
138%

(
10)
Emission
reduction
increase
(+)
or
decrease
(­)
in
tons
per
day(
2)
[((
9)
/
100%)
x
(
5)]
+
14.01
­
6.09
NOTES:
(
1)
This
area
includes
all
of
the
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority
counties
except
for
Warren
County.
These
emissions
differ
from
the
transportation
conformity
budgets
because
the
budgets
include
all
of
the
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority
counties
including
Warren
County.
(
2)
The
"
increase"
or
"
decrease"
was
calculated
by
multiplying
the
differences
in
percent
reductions
by
the
1996
updated
inventories.
These
"
increases"
and
"
decreases"
are
calculated
only
for
the
purpose
of
demonstrating
if
the
updated
inventories
continue
to
meet
the
objectives
of
the
attainment
demonstration.

The
results
summarized
in
Table
VI
indicate
that
the
updated
inventories
predict
that
VOC
emissions
in
the
attainment
year
relative
to
the
base
year
are
lower,
i.
e.,
an
"
increase"
of
14.01
tons
per
day.
However,
the
updated
inventories
predict
that
NOx
emissions
in
the
attainment
year
relative
to
the
base
year
are
higher,
i.
e.,
a
"
decrease"
of
6.09
tons
per
day.
In
order
to
evaluate
the
net
effect
of
these
changes,
a
means
of
substitution
of
VOC
reductions
with
NOx
reductions
is
needed.
The
following
substitution
methodology
was
developed
based
on
the
methodology
developed
in
a
prior
SIP
revision
by
New
Jersey
that
was
approved
by
the
USEPA.
19
19
NJDEP.
Final
State
Implementation
Plan
Revision
for
the
Attainment
and
Maintenance
of
the
Ozone
National
Ambient
Air
Quality
Standard
(
NAAQS),
New
Jersey
Revised
Motor
Vehicle
Emission
Inventories
and
Transportation
Conformity
Budgets
Using
MOBILE6
Model,
2003.
USEPA
approval:
68
Fed.
Reg.
43462.
12
42
U.
S.
C.
§
7511a.
allows
for
the
substitution
of
VOC
emission
reductions
with
NOx
emission
reductions.
Consistent
with
the
USEPA
guidance
on
NOx
substitution,
20
for
substitution
to
be
acceptable
it
must
be
demonstrated
that
such
substitution
yields
equivalent
ozone
results.
The
air
quality
modeling
in
New
Jersey's
Phase
I
Ozone
SIP21
provided
such
an
equivalency
demonstration
for
the
nonattainment
area.
In
order
to
make
the
substitution
in
this
case,
a
VOC
to
NOx
emissions
ratio
for
the
entire
Northern
New
Jersey/
New
York
City/
Long
Island
Nonattainment
Area
was
calculated.
This
calculation
is
presented
in
Appendix
C.
First,
the
VOC
and
NOx
emission
inventories
for
the
counties
from
the
various
states
in
the
nonattainment
area
were
totaled.
A
VOC
to
NOx
ratio
of
1.29
was
derived
from
these
data,
i.
e.,
1
ton
of
NOx
emission
reduction
is
equivalent
to
1.29
tons
of
VOC
in
terms
of
ozone
reduction.

Since
1
ton
of
NOx
emission
reduction
is
equivalent
to
1.29
tons
of
VOC
in
terms
of
ozone
reduction,
the
6.09
tons
per
day
of
NOx
can
be
offset
by
7.86
tons
per
day
of
the
VOC
((
6.09
tons
per
day
NOx
)
X
(
1.29)
=
7.86
tons
per
day
VOC).
This
leaves
a
net
VOC
reduction
increase
of
6.15
tons
per
day
(
14.01
tons
per
day
 
7.86
tons
per
day
=
6.15
tons
per
day).
The
remaining
VOC
emissions
indicate
that
New
Jersey's
attainment
demonstration
for
the
nonattainment
area
remains
valid
when
the
current
updates
to
the
on­
road
modeled
emission
projections
are
completed.

The
Rate
of
Progress
demonstrations
for
the
New
Jersey
portion
of
the
New
York
City/
Northern
New
Jersey/
Long
Island
nonattainment
area
also
remain
valid
because
the
projected
increases
in
the
onroad
inventories
due
to
the
change
in
planning
assumptions
are
orders
of
magnitude
below
the
amounts
that
would
result
in
failure
to
meet
the
Rate
of
Progress
targets.
According
to
the
Rate
of
Progress
SIP,
VOC
emissions
would
have
to
be
higher
by
354.06
tons
per
day
in
2005
or
314.05
tons
per
day
in
2007
before
Rate
of
Progress
targets
are
missed.
22
Based
on
New
Jersey's
update
of
its
proposed
transportation
conformity
emission
budgets,
the
New
Jersey
portion
of
the
New
York
City/
Northern
New
Jersey/
Long
Island
nonattainment
area
is
still
predicted
to
achieve
Rate
of
Progress
targets
and
attainment
of
the
1­
hour
ozone
standard
by
the
attainment
date
of
2007.
It
should
be
noted
that
these
increases
in
percent
emission
reductions
could
not
be
reallocated
to
cover
potential
emission
shortfalls
in
other
areas
without
a
more
rigorous
reassessments.

2.
Amendment
to
the
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
Conformity
Budget
An
emission
budget
was
established
for
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
under
the
General
Conformity
Rule
in
order
to
ensure
that
any
increases
in
activity
at
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
conform
to
the
1­
hour
ozone
SIP.
Emission
budgets
for
VOC
and
NOx
were
established
for
1990,
1996
and
20
USEPA,
Office
of
Air
Quality
Planning
and
Standards,
NOx
Substitution
Guidance,
December
1993.
21
NJDEP,
"
State
Implementation
Plan
Revision
for
the
Attainment
and
Maintenance
of
the
Ozone
National
Ambient
Air
Quality
Standards,
Meeting
the
Requirements
of
the
Alternative
Ozone
Attainment
Demonstration
Policy,
Phase
I
Ozone
SIP
Submittal",
December
31,
1996.
22
NJDEP,
State
Implementation
Plan
Revision
for
the
Attainment
and
Maintenance
of
the
Ozone
National
Ambient
Air
Quality
Standards,
New
Jersey
1996
Actual
Emission
Inventory
and
Rate
of
Progress
Plans
for
2002,
2005
and
2007,
2001,
Table
29
on
page
65.
13
1999
in
cooperation
with
the
United
States
Air
Force.
23,24
In
2001,
the
general
conformity
emission
budgets
for
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
were
extended
to
2002
and
2005.25
In
2003,
the
general
conformity
emission
budgets
for
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
were
updated
to
accommodate
additional
aircraft
activity.
26
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
has
had
success
over
the
years
in
reducing
emissions
through
the
implementation
of
pollution
prevention
measures.
Their
efforts
have
been
more
successful
in
reducing
VOC
emissions
than
in
reducing
NOx
emissions.
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
has
utilized
aircraft
retirement,
mission
changes,
fuel
replacement
and
maintenance
measures
to
reduce
VOCs.
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
continues
to
enhance
its
pollution
prevention
measures.
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
uses
the
Hazardous
Material
Pharmacy,
which
enhances
the
management
of
VOC
containing
materials
used
on
base.
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
provides
education
and
training
on
the
proper
use
of
materials,
conducts
audits,
and
utilizes
product
substitution
and
consolidation
to
reduce
VOCs.
In
addition,
the
anticipated
retirement
of
additional
aircraft
will
further
reduce
VOC
emissions.

McGuire
Air
Force
Base
is
anticipating
expansion
of
their
overall
mission,
including
anticipated
base
realignment
and
closure
actions
and
other
mission
changes.
In
addition,
it
is
critical
for
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
to
have
operational
flexibility
in
order
to
meet
its
mission
as
well
as
the
future
missions
of
the
Department
of
Defense.
Since
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
has
calculated
that
they
will
need
an
increased
NOx
budget
to
be
in
such
a
position,
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
has
requested
a
change
in
their
general
conformity
budgets.
27
The
current
and
projected
VOC
emissions
at
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
are
well
below
budget
levels.
Therefore,
this
request
for
an
increase
in
the
NOx
budget
will
be
offset
by
a
decrease
in
their
VOC
budget.

Such
a
change
in
McGuire
Air
Force
Base's
general
conformity
budgets
is
an
acceptable
air
quality
solution,
as
this
proposed
change
is
consistent
with
the
USEPA
policy
of
substitution
of
ozone
precursor
emission
reductions.
28
In
a
previous
budget
revision
for
McGuire
Air
Force
Base,
29
a
substitution
ratio
of
1.04
tons
of
VOC
for
every
ton
of
NOx
was
established.
Air
quality
modeling
conducted
for
the
Philadelphia
airshed
was
used
to
develop
the
substitution
ratio
for
the
McGuire
area.
This
approach
was
approved
by
the
USEPA.
30
23
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
Conformity
Determination.
July,
1995.
24
NJDEP,
State
Implementation
Plan
Revision
for
the
Attainment
and
Maintenance
of
the
Ozone
National
Ambient
Air
Quality
Standards,
Phase
I
Ozone
SIP
Submittal,
1996,
p.
123.
25
NJDEP,
State
Implementation
Plan
Revision
for
the
Attainment
and
Maintenance
of
the
Ozone
National
Ambient
Air
Quality
Standards,
New
Jersey
1996
Actual
Emission
Inventory
and
Rate
of
Progress
Plans
for
2002,
2005
and
2007,
2001,
p.
71.
26
Approval
and
Promulgation
of
Implementation
Plans;
New
Jersey;
Revised
Motor
Vehicle
Emissions
Inventories
for
1996,
2005,
and
2007
and
Motor
Vehicle
Emissions
Budgets
for
2005
and
2007
Using
MOBILE6,
Final
Rule,
68
Fed.
Reg.,
43463
(
July
23,
2003).
27
U.
S.
Dept.
of
the
Air
Force,
Letter
from
John
Hoertz,
Program
Manager,
Air
Force
Center
for
Environmental
Excellence,
Atlanta,
Georgia
to
Sandra
Krietzman,
Chief,
NJDEP,
Bureau
of
Air
Quality
Planning,
Requesting
Conformity
Budget
Change,
October
11,
2005.
28
USEPA,
"
NOx
Substitution
Guidance,"
1993.
29
NJDEP.
Final
State
Implementation
Plan
Revision
for
the
Attainment
and
Maintenance
of
the
Ozone
National
Ambient
Air
Quality
Standard
(
NAAQS),
New
Jersey
Revised
Motor
Vehicle
Emission
Inventories
and
Transportation
Conformity
Budgets
Using
MOBILE6
Model,
2003.
30
68
Fed.
Reg.,
43462­
43465
(
July
23,
2003).
14
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
holds
a
vital
status
in
the
national
defense.
Mission
responsibilities
include
the
movement
of
troops,
passengers,
military
equipment,
cargo
and
mail,
and
aerial
refueling.
The
mission
of
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
carries
its
aircrews
and
aircraft
throughout
more
than
fifty
countries
around
the
globe
on
an
around­
the­
clock
basis.
With
peacetime
taskings
serving
as
training
for
wartime
requirements,
the
base
is
continually
postured
in
a
state
of
preparedness.
Approval
of
the
SIP
emission
budgets
change
would
enhance
the
base's
ability
to
meets
its
overall
mission.

The
State
has
agreed
to
propose
McGuire
Air
Force
Base's
request
for
a
general
conformity
budget
change.
The
NOx
budgets
are
being
increased
by
450
tons
per
year
and
the
VOC
budgets
are
being
decreased
by
468
tons
per
year
(
Table
VII).
15
Table
VII
Emission
Budgets
for
McGuire
Air
Force
Base
Prior
Budget
Proposed
Updated
Budget
VOC
(
Tons/
Year)
NOx
(
Tons/
Year)
VOC
(
Tons/
Year)
NOx
(
Tons/
Year)

1990
Baseline
1,112
1,038
1,112
1,038
1996
1,186
1,107
1,186
1,107
1999
1,223
1,142
1,223
1,142
2002
1,405
875
1,405
875
2005(
1)
1,198
1,084
730
1,534
NOTES:
(
1)
Budgets
updated
such
that
the
increase
in
NOx
is
offset
by
a
decrease
in
VOC
such
that
there
is
no
expected
net
increase
in
ozone
formation.
Updated
2005
budgets
apply
to
2005
and
all
future
years
until
new
budgets
are
established
for
the
8­
hour
ozone
attainment
demonstration.

C.
New
Budget
 
Particulate
Matter
Budget
for
Northern
New
Jersey
The
establishment
of
early
PM2.5
budgets
is
to
require
their
use
by
the
Metropolitan
Planning
Organizations
in
their
transportation
conformity
determinations
during
the
interim
period
prior
to
the
PM2.5
attainment
demonstration
SIP
budgets.
31
Establishment
of
these
early
transportation
conformity
emission
budgets
will
enable
the
affected
Metropolitan
Planning
Organizations
to
demonstrate
transportation
conformity
by
the
preferred
method
of
remaining
below
area
specific
budgets
instead
of
using
one
of
the
interim
emissions
tests.
The
early
budgets
are
based
on
direct
PM2.5
and
annual
NOx
inventories
that
demonstrate
at
least
a
five
to
ten
percent
reduction
between
2002
and
2009
for
sources
in
the
New
Jersey
portion
of
the
New
York
/
New
Jersey/
Long
Island/
Connecticut
nonattainment
area.
32
The
early
budgets
must
be
used
for
future
transportation
conformity
determinations
by
the
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority
and
the
Delaware
Valley
Regional
Planning
Commission
once
approved
by
the
USEPA.
The
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority
and
the
Delaware
Valley
Regional
Planning
Commission
are
two
of
the
three
Metropolitan
Planning
Organizations
that
cover
the
State
of
New
Jersey
(
see
Figure
I).

31
The
attainment
demonstration
SIP
for
the
PM2.5
NAAQS
is
not
due
until
April
2008.
32
Personal
communication
with
USEPA
II,
October
2005.
16
1.
PM2.5
General
Background33
Particulate
matter
is
the
term
for
particles
found
in
the
air,
including
dust,
dirt,
soot,
smoke,
and
liquid
droplets.
Many
manmade
and
natural
sources
emit
particulate
matter
directly
or
emit
other
pollutants
that
react
in
the
atmosphere
to
form
particulate
matter.
Sources
of
fine
particles
include
all
types
of
combustion
activities
(
motor
vehicles,
power
plants,
wood
burning,
etc.)
and
certain
industrial
processes.
Other
particles
may
be
indirectly
formed
when
gases
from
burning
fuels
react
with
sunlight
and
water
vapor.

Particles
less
than
10
micrometers
in
diameter
(
PM10)
pose
a
health
concern
because
they
can
be
inhaled
into
and
accumulate
in
the
respiratory
system.
Particles
less
than
2.5
micrometers
in
diameter,
PM2.5,
are
referred
to
as
"
fine"
particles
and
are
believed
to
pose
the
greatest
health
risks.
Because
of
their
small
size
(
approximately
1/
30th
the
average
width
of
a
human
hair),
fine
particles
can
lodge
deeply
into
the
lungs.
Particles
with
diameters
between
2.5
and
10
micrometers
are
referred
to
as
"
coarse."

Health
studies
have
shown
a
significant
association
between
exposure
to
fine
particles
and
premature
death.
Other
important
effects
include
aggravation
of
respiratory
and
cardiovascular
disease
(
as
indicated
by
increased
hospital
admissions,
emergency
room
visits,
absences
from
school
or
work,
and
restricted
activity
days),
lung
disease,
decreased
lung
function,
asthma
attacks,
and
certain
cardiovascular
problems
such
as
heart
attacks
and
irregular
heart
beat.
Individuals
particularly
sensitive
to
fine
particle
exposure
include
older
adults,
people
with
heart
and
lung
disease,
and
children.
Roughly
one
out
of
every
three
people
in
the
United
States
is
at
a
higher
risk
of
experiencing
PM2.5
related
health
effects:
active
children
because
they
often
spend
a
lot
of
time
playing
outdoors
and
their
bodies
are
still
developing
and
oftentimes
the
elderly
population
is
at
risk.

2.
Establishment
of
the
PM2.5
Standard
42
U.
S.
C
§
7409
requires
the
USEPA
to
set
national
ambient
air
quality
standards
(
NAAQS)
for
widespread
pollutants
from
numerous
and
diverse
sources
that
are
considered
harmful
to
public
health
and
the
environment.
These
standards
are
established
to
protect
the
most
sensitive
individuals.
The
Clean
Air
Act34established
two
types
of
NAAQS.
Primary
standards
set
limits
to
protect
public
health,
including
the
health
of
"
sensitive"
populations
such
as
asthmatics,
children,
and
the
elderly.
Secondary
standards
set
limits
to
protect
public
welfare,
including
protection
against
visibility
impairment
and
damage
to
animals,
crops,
vegetation,
and
buildings.
The
Clean
Air
Act35
requires
periodic
review
of
the
science
upon
which
the
standards
are
based
and
the
standards
themselves.
The
USEPA
has
set
NAAQS
for
six
criteria
pollutant.
These
criteria
pollutants
are
carbon
monoxide,
lead,
nitrogen
dioxide,
particulate
matter,
ozone,
and
sulfur
oxides.

33
Additional
background
information
can
be
found
at
the
USEPA
website
(
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
pmdesignations/
faq.
htm%
230).
34
42
U.
S.
C.
§
7409(
a).
35
42
U.
S.
C
§
7409(
d).
17
In
July
of
1997,
the
USEPA
revised
the
primary
(
health­
based)
particulate
matter
standards
by
promulgating
two
PM2.5
NAAQS:
a
24­
hour
PM2.5
standard
set
at
65
micrograms
per
cubic
meter
(
µ
g/
m3)
(
24­
hour
average)
and
an
annual
PM2.5
standard
set
at
15
µ
g/
m3
(
annual
arithmetic
mean).
The
USEPA
added
these
new
PM2.5
standards
while
retaining
the
existing
annual
PM10
standard
of
50
µ
g/
m3
and
adjusting
the
PM10
24­
hour
standard
of
150
µ
g/
m3
by
changing
the
form
of
the
standard.
The
ambient
air
quality
in
New
Jersey
continues
to
meet
the
PM10
NAAQS
and
is
designated
as
attainment.

After
the
USEPA
promulgated
the
PM2.5
and
8­
hour
ozone
standards
in
July
1997,
several
industry
organizations
and
state
governments
challenged
USEPA's
action
in
the
U.
S.
Court
of
Appeals
for
the
District
of
Columbia
Circuit
(
the
D.
C.
Circuit).
After
several
years
of
legal
challenges,
some
of
which
were
heard
by
the
United
States
Supreme
Court,
the
D.
C.
Circuit
issued
its
decision
on
March
26,
2002
rejecting
the
claim
that
the
USEPA
had
acted
arbitrarily
and
capriciously
in
setting
the
levels
of
the
standards.
This
last
decision
by
the
D.
C.
Circuit
gave
the
USEPA
a
clear
path
to
move
forward
with
implementation
of
the
PM2.5
standards.

The
Clean
Air
Act
(
42
U.
S.
C.
§
7409(
d))
requires
the
USEPA
to
periodically
review
air
quality
standards
to
ensure
they
provide
adequate
health
and
environmental
protection
and
to
update
those
standards
if
necessary.
The
USEPA
has
proposed
revisions
to
strengthen
the
current
PM2.5
standards
as
well
as
proposed
a
standard
for
reducing
inhalable
coarse
particles
(
particles
between
2.5
and
10
micrometers).
The
USEPA
has
established
a
tentative
timeline
for
this
process
that
includes
November
of
2006
as
the
effective
date
of
the
revised/
new
standards,
July
of
2013
as
the
effective
date
of
designations,
and
July
of
2018
as
the
prospective
attainment
date.

3.
Designation
of
PM2.5
Nonattainment
Areas
in
New
Jersey
The
USEPA
promulgated
the
NAAQS
for
PM2.5
in
July
of
1997.
According
to
the
Clean
Air
Act,
states
and
tribes
are
required
to
submit
recommendations
for
designations
no
later
than
one
year
after
a
NAAQS
has
been
revised
or
newly
promulgated.
The
USEPA
is
then
required
to
designate
areas
across
the
country
within
two
years
following
the
promulgation
of
the
NAAQS.
USEPA
may
extend
the
time
period
for
making
designations
by
up
to
one
additional
year
if
the
USEPA
lacks
sufficient
information
to
make
the
designations.

The
USEPA
issued
final
area
designations
for
PM2.5
on
December
17,
2004.
The
affected
New
Jersey
counties
are
shown
in
Figure
III.
Designations
became
effective
on
April
5,
2005.
Transportation
conformity
for
PM2.5
becomes
effective
on
April
5,
2006.
This
is
because
there
is
a
one­
year
grace
period
from
the
effective
date
of
designations
before
transportation
conformity
applies
for
that
standard.

States
with
designated
PM2.5
nonattainment
areas
are
required
to
develop
a
SIP
and
submit
it
to
the
USEPA
within
three
years
of
designation
or
April
of
200836.
This
plan
must
include
enforceable
measures
for
reducing
air
pollutant
emissions
leading
to
the
formation
of
fine
particles
in
the
atmosphere.
The
plan
must
also
provide
steps
for
the
area
to
attain
the
PM2.5
standard
as
quickly
as
possible.
The
USEPA
has
recently
issued
a
proposed
PM2.5
36
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
pmdesignations
18
implementation
rule
to
provide
further
guidance
on
what
should
be
included
in
PM2.5
plans.
State
plans
need
to
demonstrate
that
the
nonattainment
area
will
attain
the
standards
"
as
expeditiously
as
practicable."

4.
Transportation
Conformity
for
PM2.5
The
Transportation
Conformity
Rules
that
established
the
criteria
and
procedures
relating
to
transportation
conformity
for
PM2.5
were
promulgated
by
the
USEPA
on
July
1,
2004.37
Before
a
SIP
budget
is
available,
either
through
an
adequacy
finding
or
approval
by
the
USEPA,
conformity
of
the
transportation
plan,
transportation
improvement
program,
or
project
not
from
a
conforming
plan
is
demonstrated
with
the
interim
emissions
tests.
38
The
interim
emissions
tests
for
PM2.5
are
either
the
baseline
year
test
or
the
build/
no­
greater­
than­
no­
build
test.

The
baseline
year
test
is
passed
when
the
emissions
from
the
proposed
transportation
system
are
either
less
than
or
no
greater
than
2002
motor
vehicle
emissions
in
a
given
nonattainment
area.
Conformity
is
demonstrated
with
the
build/
no­
greater­
than­
no­
build
test
if
emissions
from
the
proposed
transportation
system
("
build"
or
"
action"
scenario)
are
less
than
or
equal
to
the
emissions
in
the
same
future
analysis
year
from
the
existing
transportation
system
("
no­
build"
or
"
baseline"
scenario).
The
Metropolitan
Planning
Organizations
in
PM2.5
nonattainment
areas
must
utilize
either
the
baseline
year
test
or
the
build/
no­
greater­
than­
no­
build
test
until
the
budgets
are
found
adequate
by
the
USEPA.
Regardless
of
the
test
performed,
conformity
analyses
are
subject
to
final
approval
by
the
United
States
Department
of
Transportation.

Four
transportation
related
PM2.5
precursors
 
NOx,
VOCs,
SOx,
and
NH3
 
must
be
considered
in
the
conformity
process
in
PM2.5
nonattainment
areas.
The
USEPA
requirements39
for
the
consideration
of
PM2.5
precursors
are:

 
Regional
emissions
analysis
must
include
NOx
as
a
PM2.5
precursor
in
all
PM2.5
nonattainment
areas,
unless
the
head
of
the
state
air
agency
and
the
USEPA
Regional
Administrator
make
a
finding
that
NOx
is
not
a
significant
contributor
to
the
PM2.5
air
quality
problem
in
a
given
area.

 
Regional
emissions
analyses
are
not
required
for
VOC,
SOx
or
NH3
before
an
approved
SIP
budget
for
such
precursors
is
established,
unless
the
head
of
the
state
air
agency
or
the
USEPA
Regional
Administrator
makes
a
finding
that
onroad
emissions
of
any
of
these
precursors
is
a
significant
contributor.

37
Transportation
Conformity
Rule
Amendments
for
the
New
8­
hour
Ozone
and
PM2.5
National
Ambient
Air
Quality
Standards
and
Miscellaneous
Revisions
for
Existing
Areas;
Transportation
Conformity
Rule
Amendments:
Response
to
Court
Decision
and
Additional
Rule
Changes;
Final
Rule,
69
Fed.
Reg.,
40004­
40081
(
July
1,
2004).
38
40
CFR
93.119.
39
Transportation
Conformity
Rule
Amendments
for
the
New
PM2.5
National
Ambient
Air
Quality
Standard:
PM2.5
Precursors,
Final
Rule,
70
Fed.
Reg.,
24280
(
May
6,
2005).
19
Figure
III
20
The
following
criteria
are
considered
in
making
significance
or
insignificance
findings
for
PM2.5
precursors:

 
The
contribution
of
onroad
emissions
of
the
precursor
to
the
total
2002
baseline
SIP
inventory;
 
The
current
state
of
air
quality
for
the
area;
 
The
results
of
speciation
monitoring
for
the
area;
 
The
likelihood
that
future
motor
vehicle
control
measures
will
be
implemented
for
a
given
precursor;
and,
 
Projections
of
future
onroad
emissions
of
the
precursor.

The
proposed
early
budgets
for
PM2.5
precursors
include
the
establishment
of
an
annual
NOx
budget.
The
State
will
study
the
significance
of
the
other
PM2.5
precursors
in
the
attainment
demonstration
SIP,
due
to
be
submitted
in
April
2008.
Studying
the
significance
of
these
precursors
with
the
attainment
demonstration
will
enable
the
State
to
utilize
the
best
available
information,
monitoring
data,
inventory
data
and
modeling
data
in
its
determinations.

5.
Early
PM2.5
Transportation
Conformity
Emission
Budgets
i.
PM2.5
and
Annual
NOx
Inventories
for
2002
and
2009
To
establish
an
early
PM2.5
budget,
the
USEPA
requires40
that:

In
reference
to
the
voluntary
SIP
that
includes
early
budgets,
the
preamble
states:

"
To
be
approvable,
such
a
SIP
would
have
to
include
inventories
for
all
source
sectors
and
meet
other
SIP
requirements.
While
these
early
SIPs
would
have
to
show
some
progress
toward
attainment,
it
is
not
a
requirement
that
all
of
the
reductions
would
come
from
onroad
mobile
vehicles."

The
term
"
some
progress
toward
attainment"
has
been
interpreted
by
the
USEPA
to
mean
that
the
total
2009
inventories
for
direct
PM2.5
and
annual
NOx
to
be
less
than
the
2002
values
by
at
least
five
to
ten
percent.
41
Annual
NOx
is
the
only
PM2.5
precursor
for
which
a
budget
is
being
established
at
this
time.
The
additional
information
and
data
on
PM2.5
precursors
that
will
be
available
during
the
preparation
of
the
PM2.5
attainment
demonstration
may
result
in
the
establishment
of
budgets
for
additional
or
different
specific
precursors.
The
five
percent
to
ten
percent
criteria
is
met
for
the
New
Jersey
portion
of
the
New
York/
New
Jersey/
Long
Island
/
Connecticut
PM2.5
nonattainment
area
but
is
not
met
for
the
New
Jersey
portion
of
the
Philadelphia/
Wilmington
PM2.5
nonattainment
area.
Preliminary
results
show
a
small
increase
in
overall
direct
PM2.5
emissions
between
2002
and
2009
for
the
New
Jersey
portion
of
the
Philadelphia/
Wilmington
PM2.5
nonattainment
area.
Therefore,
early
PM2.5
budgets
are
being
established
for
the
New
Jersey
portion
of
the
New
York/
New
Jersey/
Long
Island
/
Connecticut
PM2.5
nonattainment
area
only.

40
69
Fed.
Reg.,
40030.
41
USEPA
Region
2
and
NJDEP,
conference
call,
October
4,
2005.
21
Table
VIII
shows
the
results
of
the
2002
and
2009
direct
PM2.5
inventory
(
with
anticipated
controls
in
place)
by
source
type
for
the
New
Jersey
counties
in
the
New
York
/
New
Jersey/
Long
Island/
Connecticut
PM2.5
nonattainment
area.
Emissions
from
controlled
stationary
and
area
sources
are
projected
to
increase
by
nine
and
three
percent
respectively,
for
a
total
increase
of
438
tons
per
year.
The
increase
is
projected
to
be
more
than
offset
by
projected
decreases
in
PM2.5
emissions
from
onroad
and
nonroad
mobile
sources,
by
a
total
of
1,343
tons
per
year,
for
an
overall
decrease
of
905
tons
per
year
by
2009;
this
represent
an
overall
6.5%
reduction
in
direct
PM2.5
emissions,
see
Table
IX.
Thus
the
area
meets
the
USEPA's
criteria
for
"
progress
toward
attainment"
for
direct
PM2.5
emissions.

Table
VIII
Direct
PM2.5
Emission
Inventories
for
2002
and
2009
for
the
New
Jersey
Portion
of
the
New
York
/
New
Jersey/
Long
Island/
Connecticut
PM2.5
Nonattainment
Area
DIRECT
ANNUAL
PM2.5
CONTROLLED
EMISSIONS
(
TONS
PER
YEAR)
(
1)

AREA
NONROAD
STATIONARY
ONROAD
COUNTY
2002
2009
(
2009­
2002)
2002
2009
(
2009­
2002)
2002
2009
(
2009­
2002)
2002
2009
(
2009­
2002)
BERGEN
537
569
+
32
478
419
­
59
149
183
+
34
376
214
­
162
ESSEX
411
436
+
25
393
341
­
51
185
222
+
37
291
163
­
128
HUDSON
269
286
+
16
345
299
­
45
1,077
1,085
+
7
134
76
­
58
MERCER
530
548
+
18
203
177
­
26
188
212
+
24
141
89
­
52
MIDDLESEX
467
497
+
30
346
299
­
47
483
553
+
70
347
207
­
140
MONMOUTH
981
1,002
+
21
501
426
­
75
55
66
+
10
244
145
­
100
MORRIS
1,284
1,297
+
13
280
251
­
29
39
45
+
6
209
126
­
83
PASSAIC
543
554
+
11
178
151
­
27
19
22
+
3
141
81
­
60
SOMERSET
441
452
+
11
149
131
­
19
55
60
+
4
152
88
­
64
UNION
272
289
+
17
333
291
­
42
540
589
+
49
185
108
­
78
TOTAL
for
New
Jersey
portion
of
the
NY/
NJ/
LI/
CT
Area
5,736
5,930
+
193
(+
3%)
3,206
2,788
­
419
(­
13%)
2,790
3,035
+
245
(+
9%)
2,220
1,296
­
924
(­
42%)

NOTES:
(
1)
In
order
for
the
calculated
inventory
values
to
more
closely
match
the
actual
measured
levels
in
New
Jersey
air
quality
monitors,
the
fugitive
dust
emissions
were
multiplied
by
a
dust
adjustment
factor
of
20%.
Fugitive
dusts
are
directly
released
air
contaminants
that
do
not
pass
through
an
exhaust
pipe,
stack,
flue,
vent
or
chimney.
The
main
sources
of
fugitive
dusts
are
dust
from
paved
and
unpaved
roadways,
stock/
storage
piles,
landfill
activity,
quarry/
mining
activity,
raw
material
handling,
construction
and
agricultural
tilling.
22
Table
IX
Direct
PM2.5:
Calculation
of
the
Percent
Reduction
in
Projected
2009
Emissions
from
the
2002
Emissions
by
County
CONTROLLED
EMISSIONS
ANNUAL
(
TONS
PER
YEAR)(
1)
%
EMISSION
REDUCTION
TOTAL
OF
ALL
SECTORS
COUNTY
(
2009­
2002)/
2002
2002
2009
2009­
2002
BERGEN
­
10.0%
1,540
1,385
­
155
ESSEX
­
9.2%
1,280
1,162
­
117
HUDSON
­
4.4%
1,825
1,746
­
80
MERCER
­
3.4%
1,062
1,026
­
36
MIDDLESEX
­
5.3%
1,643
1,556
­
87
MONMOUTH
­
8.1%
1,781
1,639
­
144
MORRIS
­
5.1%
1,812
1,719
­
93
PASSAIC
­
8.3%
881
808
­
73
SOMERSET
­
8.6%
797
731
­
68
UNION
­
4.0%
1,330
1,277
­
54
TOTAL
for
New
Jersey
portion
of
the
NY/
NJ/
LI/
CT
Area
­
6.5%
13,952
13,049
­
905
NOTES:
(
1)
In
order
for
the
calculated
inventory
values
to
more
closely
match
the
actual
measured
levels
in
New
Jersey
air
quality
monitors,
the
fugitive
dust
emissions
were
multiplied
by
a
dust
adjustment
factor
of
20%.
Fugitive
dusts
are
directly
released
air
contaminants
that
do
not
pass
through
an
exhaust
pipe,
stack,
flue,
vent
or
chimney.
The
main
sources
of
fugitive
dusts
are
dust
from
paved
and
unpaved
roadways,
stock/
storage
piles,
landfill
activity,
quarry/
mining
activity,
raw
material
handling,
construction
and
agricultural
tilling.

Table
X
shows
the
results
of
the
2002
and
projected
2009
NOx
inventories
by
source
type
for
the
New
Jersey
counties
in
the
New
York
/
New
Jersey/
Long
Island/
Connecticut
PM2.5
nonattainment
area.
Emissions
from
stationary
and
area
sources
are
projected
to
increase
by
seven
percent
in
both
categories,
for
a
total
increase
of
3,698
tons
per
year.
The
increase
is
projected
to
be
more
than
offset
by
projected
decreases
in
NOx
emissions
from
onroad
and
nonroad
mobile
sources,
by
a
total
of
79,959
tons
per
year,
for
an
overall
decrease
of
76,261
tons
per
year,
or
about
thirty­
two
percent
(
32%),
by
2009.
Thus
the
area
meets
the
USEPA's
criteria
for
"
progress
toward
attainment"
for
direct
NOx
emissions.
23
Table
X
Annual
NOx
Emission
Inventories
for
2002
and
2009
for
the
New
Jersey
Portion
of
the
New
York
/
New
Jersey/
Long
Island/
Connecticut
PM2.5
Nonattainment
Area
CONTROLLED
EMISSIONS
ANNUAL
(
TONS
PER
YEAR)
SOURCE
CATEGORY
AREA
NONROAD
STATIONARY
ONROAD
COUNTY
2002
2009
(
2009­
2002)
2002
2009
(
2009­
2002)
2002
2009
(
2009­
2002)
2002
2009
(
2009­
2002)
BERGEN
2,815
3,019
+
204
6,707
5,178
­
1,530
988
1,189
+
201
23,917
11,198
­
12,719
ESSEX
2,436
2,621
+
185
8,137
7,048
­
1,090
2,441
3,081
+
640
16,537
7,979
­
8,558
HUDSON
1,735
1,864
+
129
5,976
5,291
­
685
9,674
9,970
+
296
7,853
3,873
­
3,980
MERCER
1,257
1,354
+
97
2,427
1,898
­
529
13,034
13,201
+
167
8,505
4,328
­
4,177
MIDDLESEX
2,343
2,512
+
169
4,849
3,745
­
1,104
3,567
4,164
+
597
22,147
10,871
­
11,276
MONMOUTH
1,806
1,934
+
128
4,316
3,846
­
470
240
272
+
31
14,860
6,973
­
7,887
MORRIS
1,752
1,879
+
127
3,151
2,417
­
735
284
337
+
53
13,748
6,398
­
7,350
PASSAIC
1,361
1,452
+
91
2,413
1,800
­
613
122
144
+
22
8,748
4,164
­
4,584
SOMERSET
1,048
1,121
+
74
2,097
1,570
­
527
313
370
+
57
9,090
4,376
­
4,715
UNION
1,621
1,732
+
111
5,883
4,903
­
980
3,757
4,077
+
320
12,294
5,844
­
6,451
TOTAL
for
New
Jersey
portion
of
the
NY/
NJ/
LI/
CT
Area
18,173
19,488
+
1,314
(+
7%)
45,957
37,694
­
8,262
(­
18%)
34,420
36,804
+
2,384
(+
7%)
137,701
66,004
­
71,697
(­
52%)

Table
XI
is
a
comparison
of
total
NOx
emissions
for
2002
and
2009
by
source
sector
for
the
New
Jersey
counties
in
the
New
York
/
New
Jersey/
Long
Island/
Connecticut
PM2.5
nonattainment
area.
Annual
NOx
emissions
are
projected
to
be
lower
in
each
county
and
across
the
entire
New
Jersey
portion
of
the
New
York
/
New
Jersey/
Long
Island/
Connecticut
PM2.5
nonattainment
area
by
17.6
percent
to
41.7
percent
with
an
average
of
over
30
percent.
Based
on
these
annual
NOx
inventories,
the
New
Jersey
portion
of
the
New
York
/
New
Jersey/
Long
Island/
Connecticut
area
meets
the
USEPA
criteria
of
a
reduction
of
at
least
five
to
ten
percent
to
allow
the
area
to
be
considered
for
the
establishment
of
early
PM2.5
budgets
in
a
voluntary
SIP.
24
Table
XI
Annual
NOx:
Calculation
of
the
Percent
Reduction
in
Projected
2009
Emissions
from
the
2002
Emissions
by
County
CONTROLLED
EMISSIONS
ANNUAL
(
TONS
PER
YEAR)
SOURCE
CATEGORY
%
EMISSION
REDUCTION
TOTAL
OF
ALL
SECTORS
COUNTY
(
2009­
2002)/
2002
2002
2009
2009­
2002
BERGEN
­
40.2%
34,427
20,584
­
13,843
ESSEX
­
29.9%
29,551
20,729
­
8,822
HUDSON
­
16.8%
25,238
20,998
­
4,240
MERCER
­
17.6%
25,223
20,781
­
4,442
MIDDLESEX
­
35.3%
32,906
21,292
­
11,614
MONMOUTH
­
38.6%
21,222
13,025
­
8,197
MORRIS
­
41.7%
18,935
11,031
­
7,904
PASSAIC
­
40.2%
12,644
7,560
­
5,084
SOMERSET
­
40.7%
12,548
7,437
­
5,112
UNION
­
29.7%
23,555
16,556
­
7,000
TOTAL
for
the
New
Jersey
portion
of
the
NY/
NJ/
LI/
CT
Area
­
32.3%
236,251
159,990
­
76,261
The
New
Jersey
portion
of
the
New
York
/
New
Jersey/
Long
Island/
Connecticut
PM2.5
nonattainment
area
meets
the
USEPA
criterion
for
progress
towards
attainment
and
is
eligible
for
establishing
an
early
PM2.5
transportation
budget.
The
calculation
methodologies
used
for
the
emissions
are
found
in
Appendix
C.

ii.
Early
Transportation
Conformity
Emission
Budgets
for
PM2.5
and
Annual
NOx
The
early
direct
PM2.5
and
annual
NOx
transportation
conformity
emission
budgets
are
provided
in
Table
XII.
These
budgets
must
be
used
for
future
transportation
conformity
determinations
by
the
Metropolitan
Planning
Organizations
once
the
USEPA
finds
them
adequate
or
approves
them.
25
Table
XII
Transportation
Conformity
Emission
Budgets
Direct
PM2.5
Emissions(
1)

(
tons
per
year)
Annual
NOx
Emissions
(
tons
per
year)
Transportation
Planning
Area
2009
2009
North
Jersey
Transportation
Planning
Authority(
2)
1,207
61,676
Delaware
Valley
Regional
Planning
Commission(
3)
89
4,328
NOTES:
(
1)
Direct
PM2.5
consists
of
the
sum
of:
SO4,
Organic
Carbon,
Elemental
Carbon,
particulate
matter
from
Gasoline
Vehicles,
Lead,
Brake
particles
and
Tire
particles.
(
2)
For
Bergen,
Essex,
Hudson,
Middlesex,
Monmouth,
Morris,
Passaic,
Somerset
and
Union
counties.
(
3)
For
Mercer
County.
26
III.
Carbon
Monoxide
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
for
Camden
County
and
the
Nine
Not­
Classified
Areas
In
1995,
the
State
demonstrated42
to
the
USEPA
that
Camden
County
and
the
nine
not­
classified
areas
were
in
attainment
of
the
carbon
monoxide
health
standard
by
submitting
an
Attainment
Demonstration
and
Maintenance
Plan.
The
USEPA
subsequently
approved
the
State's
Plan.
This
SIP
revision
proposes
the
second
ten
(
10)
year
maintenance
plan
for
these
areas.

Attainment
and
maintenance
of
the
carbon
monoxide
health
standard
represents
a
significant
health
benefit
to
the
citizens
of
New
Jersey.
Carbon
monoxide
has
significant
health
effects
when
present
in
levels
above
the
standard.
An
odorless,
colorless
gas,
carbon
monoxide
is
readily
absorbed
by
the
body
through
the
lungs
and
can
reduce
the
amount
of
oxygen
that
reaches
the
heart,
brain,
and
other
tissues.
Exposure
to
elevated
carbon
monoxide
levels
has
been
linked
to
adverse
health
effects
and
can
be
especially
harmful
to
children,
people
with
heart
disease,
and
pregnant
women.
At
moderate
levels,
carbon
monoxide
exposure
has
been
linked
to
symptoms
such
as
dizziness,
nausea,
fatigue,
poor
vision
and
concentration,
headaches,
and
heart
pains.
Exposure
to
high
levels
of
carbon
monoxide
may
result
in
unconsciousness
and
death.

This
SIP
revision
proposes
a
consolidated
Maintenance
Plan
for
ten
of
New
Jersey's
eleven
existing
carbon
monoxide
maintenance
areas
that
demonstrates
continued
compliance
with
the
carbon
monoxide
health­
based
standard,
describes
how
the
State
will
continue
to
maintain
the
carbon
monoxide
NAAQS
until
the
year
2017
in
those
areas,
and
provides
a
contingency
plan
that
would
be
implemented
should
the
State
ever
again
violate
the
carbon
monoxide
NAAQS
in
those
areas.
The
history
of
New
Jersey's
previous
Carbon
Monoxide
SIP
revisions
is
included
as
Appendix
A.

A.
Background
The
Clean
Air
Act,
42
U.
S.
C.
§
7401
et
seq.
requires
all
areas
of
the
nation
to
attain
and
maintain
compliance
with
the
NAAQS.
These
NAAQS
are
designed
to
protect
public
health
and
welfare
from
specific
pollutants.
For
carbon
monoxide,
there
are
two
primary
NAAQS:
an
average
1­
hour
standard
of
35
parts
per
million
and
a
non­
overlapping
average
8­
hour
standard
of
9
parts
per
million.

Carbon
monoxide
concentrations
in
New
Jersey
have
not
exceeded
the
1­
hour
standard
since
the
late
1970s.
Typical
1­
hour
maximum
concentrations
in
New
Jersey
in
recent
years
have
been
less
than
7
parts
per
million,
well
below
the
35
parts
per
million
level.
The
last
exceedance
of
the
8­
hour
carbon
monoxide
NAAQS
was
in
1995.
Typical
8­
hour
carbon
monoxide
levels
are
less
than
five
parts
per
million.
New
Jersey's
noncompliance
with
the
8­
hour
carbon
monoxide
NAAQS
prior
to
1996
was
due
primarily
to
highway
sources
and
was
limited
to
specific
areas
during
stagnating
meteorological
conditions.
A
monitoring
site
is
in
violation
of
the
8­
hour
42
New
Jersey
Carbon
Monoxide
State
Implementation
Plan,
Redesignation
And
Maintenance
Plan
For
Camden
County,
New
Jersey
Department
of
Environmental
Protection,
September
29,
1995,
and
New
Jersey
Carbon
Monoxide
State
Implementation
Plan,
Redesignation
and
Maintenance
Plan
for
the
Nine
Not­
Classified
Areas,
New
Jersey
Department
of
Environmental
Protection,
September
29,
1995.
27
standard
if
it
experiences
two
or
more
exceedances
of
the
9
parts
per
million
standard
within
any
calendar
year.

Based
on
prior
violations
of
the
8­
hour
carbon
monoxide
standard,
New
Jersey
had
eleven
nonattainment
areas,
all
of
which
have
since
been
redesignated
to
attainment
and
are
currently
considered
maintenance
areas.
New
Jersey's
three
8­
hour
carbon
monoxide
maintenance
plans
cover
the
following
areas
of
the
State:

1)
Camden
County
 
All
of
Camden
County
2)
Nine
Not­
Classified
Areas
­
the
City
of
Atlantic
City
(
in
Atlantic
County),
the
City
of
Burlington
(
in
Burlington
County),
the
Borough
of
Freehold
(
in
Monmouth
County),
the
Town
of
Morristown
(
in
Morris
County),
the
Borough
of
Penns
Grove
(
in
Salem
County),
the
City
of
Perth
Amboy
(
in
Middlesex
County),
the
Borough
of
Somerville
(
in
Somerset
County),
the
Toms
River
Area
(
in
Ocean
County),
and
the
City
of
Trenton
(
in
Mercer
County)

3)
Northeastern
New
Jersey
­
Hudson,
Essex,
Bergen
and
Union
Counties,
and
the
municipalities
of
Clifton,
Passaic
and
Paterson
in
Passaic
County.
This
area
is
part
of
the
New
York
City/
Northern
New
Jersey/
Long
Island
carbon
monoxide
maintenance
area.

New
Jersey's
8­
hour
carbon
monoxide
maintenance
areas
are
shown
in
Figure
IV.

The
Camden
County
area's
classification
as
a
moderate
nonattainment
area
reflected
its
1989
design
value
of
9.7
parts
per
million.
The
1994
8­
hour
average
design
value
for
Camden
County
was
6.9
parts
per
million,
well
below
the
standard
of
9
parts
per
million.
No
violation
of
the
8­
hour
average
carbon
monoxide
standard
has
occurred
in
any
of
the
nine
not­
classified
areas
since
1986.
The
Camden
County
area
and
the
Nine
Not­
Classified
areas
were
redesignated
by
the
USEPA
as
attainment
areas
in
1996.43
New
Jersey's
first
ten­
year
maintenance
plans44
(
which
included
contingency
measures)
for
the
Camden
County
area
and
the
Nine
Not­
Classified
areas
covered
a
12­
year
period
(
1995 
2007).

New
Jersey's
eleventh
carbon
monoxide
nonattainment
area
was
redesignated
by
the
USEPA
as
an
attainment
area
in
2002.
New
Jersey's
attainment
demonstration
submittal
of
August
7,
1998,
for
the
Northern
area
showed
that
8­
hour
average
concentrations
of
carbon
monoxide
at
New
Jersey's
monitoring
sites
in
the
Northern
New
Jersey
carbon
monoxide
nonattainment
area
fell
43
SIP
Revision
for
the
Attainment
and
Maintenance
of
the
Carbon
Monoxide
National
Ambient
Air
Quality
Standards,
Redesignation
Request
and
Maintenance
Plan
for
the
New
Jersey
Portion
of
the
New
York­
Northern
New
Jersey­
Long
Island
Carbon
Monoxide
Nonattainment
Area,
New
Jersey
Department
of
Environmental
Protection,
January
15,
2002.
44
New
Jersey
Carbon
Monoxide
State
Implementation
Plan,
Redesignation
And
Maintenance
Plan
For
Camden
County,
New
Jersey
Department
of
Environmental
Protection,
September
29,
1995,
and
New
Jersey
Carbon
Monoxide
State
Implementation
Plan,
Redesignation
and
Maintenance
Plan
for
the
Nine
Not­
Classified
Areas,
New
Jersey
Department
of
Environmental
Protection,
September
29,
1995.
28
below
the
standard
beginning
in
1996.45
The
first
ten­
year
maintenance
plan
and
contingency
measures
for
this
area
covered
the
12­
year
period,
2002­
2014.

This
consolidated
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
covers
the
second
follow­
on
ten­
year
maintenance
plans
for
the
Camden
County
and
Nine
Not­
Classified
Carbon
Monoxide
Maintenance
Areas.
The
Northern
New
Jersey
Carbon
Monoxide
Maintenance
Area
is
not
addressed
in
this
Limited
Maintenance
Plan.
A
second
ten­
year
maintenance
plan
that
will
cover
the
years
2015­
2024
for
the
northeastern
New
Jersey
Carbon
Monoxide
Maintenance
Area
is
expected
to
be
proposed
in
2012.
Elsewhere
in
this
proposed
SIP
revision,
the
carbon
monoxide
budgets
for
the
northern
New
Jersey
Carbon
Monoxide
Maintenance
Area
are
being
updated.

B.
Air
Quality
Update
Carbon
monoxide
levels
have
improved
dramatically
in
New
Jersey
over
the
past
thirty
years
and
are
currently
about
one­
half
that
of
the
standard,
Figure
II.
The
last
time
the
carbon
monoxide
8­
hour
NAAQS
was
exceeded
in
New
Jersey
was
in
January
of
1995.
Figure
II
shows
the
second
highest
8­
hour
value
recorded
throughout
the
monitoring
network
during
each
year.

A
design
value
is
based
on
monitored
readings
used
by
the
USEPA
to
determine
an
area's
air
quality
status.
New
Jersey's
carbon
monoxide
design
values
for
the
years
2002­
2003
(
see
Table
XIII)
are
all
well
below
7.65
parts
per
million,
an
eligibility
requirement
to
qualify
for
a
Limited
Maintenance
Plan.
46
45
SIP
Revision
for
the
Attainment
and
Maintenance
of
the
Carbon
Monoxide
National
Ambient
Air
Quality
Standards,
Attainment
Demonstration
for
the
New
Jersey
Portion
of
the
New
York­
Northern
New
Jersey­
Long
Island
Carbon
Monoxide
Nonattainment
Area,
New
Jersey
Department
of
Environmental
Protection,
August
7,
1998.
46USEPA,
Memorandum
from
Joseph
Paisie
(
OAQPS)
to
Regional
Air
Branch
Chiefs,
"
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
Option
for
Non­
Classifiable
CO
Nonattainment
Areas,"
10/
6/
1995.
29
New
Jersey
Carbon
Monoxide
Maintenance
Areas
Figure
IV
Nine
Not­
Classified
Areas
1.
Atlantic
City
2.
Burlington
City
3.
Freehold
Boro
4.
Morristown
5.
Penns
Grove
6.
Perth
Amboy
7.
Somerville
(
in
8.
Toms
River
Area
9.
Trenton
30
Table
XIII
Design
Values
for
Carbon
Monoxide
in
New
Jersey
(
8­
hour
standard
­
9
parts
per
million)

Monitoring
Location
2002­
2003
Design
Value
(
parts
per
million)
Ancora
S.
H.
0.8
Burlington
2.5
Camden
Lab(
1)
2.1
East
Orange
4.2
Elizabeth
4.4
Elizabeth
Lab
3.1
Fort
Lee(
2)
2.6
Freehold
2.2
Hackensack
3.4
Jersey
City
2.9
Morristown
2.4
Newark
Lab(
3)
2.9
Perth
Amboy
2.5
Notes:
(
1)
Data
not
available
October­
December
2003
(
2)
Data
not
available
July­
August
2002
(
3)
Data
not
available
July­
December
2003
C.
The
USEPA
Guidance
and
Requirements
for
Limited
Maintenance
Plans
42
U.
S.
C.
§
7505a
requires
that,
eight
years
after
redesignation
of
any
area
as
an
attainment
area,
states
submit
an
additional
revision
of
the
SIP
for
maintaining
the
NAAQS
for
ten
years
beyond
the
initial
ten­
year
maintenance
period.
Two
of
New
Jersey's
maintenance
plans
(
the
Camden
County
area
and
the
Nine
Not­
Classified
areas)
expire
in
2007.
New
Jersey
is
proposing
a
consolidated
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
that
would
cover
all
of
the
second
ten­
year
period
for
both
areas.

The
USEPA
issued
guidance
in
1995
describing
the
eligibility
criteria
and
planning
requirements
for
limited
maintenance
plans.
47
The
USEPA
Region
II
provided
supplemental
information
specific
to
New
Jersey
in
correspondence
dated
January
27,
2005.48
USEPA
Region
II
provided
additional
guidance.
49
Areas
are
eligible
for
limited
maintenance
plans
only
if
current
carbon
monoxide
design
values
are
at
or
below
7.65
parts
per
million
(
i.
e.,
set
at
85
percent
of
the
8­
hour
NAAQS
of
9
parts
per
million).
Table
XIII
demonstrates
that
this
is
the
case
for
all
of
the
sites
located
in
the
three
New
47
Op
cit,
note
43.
48
USEPA,
Electronic
mail
from
Henry
Feingersh
of
Region
II
to
Christine
Schell,
NJDEP,
Bureau
of
Air
Quality
Planning,
January
27,
2005,
8:
45
am.
49
NJDEP
and
USEPA,
Region
II,
Conference
call,
September
23,
2005.
31
Jersey's
carbon
monoxide
maintenance
areas.
In
addition
to
an
analysis
of
monitoring
data
to
demonstrate
eligibility,
approvable
Limited
Maintenance
Plans
must
contain
the
following
planning
elements:

1)
Attainment
Inventory:
New
Jersey
is
required
to
submit
an
attainment
inventory
(
summary
of
wintertime
carbon
monoxide
emissions
data
by
county
and
sector)
to
the
USEPA
that
coincides
with
a
year
where
monitoring
data
show
attainment.
50
Emission
projections
for
the
maintenance
period
are
not
required.

2)
Maintenance
Demonstration:
The
following
elements
provide
adequate
assurance
of
maintenance:
 
Continued
applicability
of
Prevention
of
Significant
Deterioration
requirements;
 
Any
control
measures
already
in
the
SIP.

3)
SIP
Commitments:
New
Jersey
must
commit
to:
 
Maintain
a
monitoring
network
to
verify
attainment
through
the
maintenance
period;
 
Continue
to
perform
project­
level
transportation
conformity
reviews
(
area
wide
emission
"
budget
tests"
are
not
required
for
limited
maintenance
plans);
and,
 
Submittal
of
a
full
maintenance
plan
if
future
design
values
in
an
area
exceed
7.65
parts
per
million.

4)
Contingency
Plan:
New
Jersey
must
document
the
measures
that
will
be
promptly
adopted
and
implemented
if
a
violation
(
or
exceedance)
of
the
NAAQS
occurs
during
the
maintenance
period.

5)
Conformity
Determinations:
According
to
the
1995
USEPA
guidance
document
for
Limited
Maintenance
Plans,
the
Transportation
Conformity
Rule
and
the
General
Conformity
Rule
apply
to
nonattainment
areas
and
maintenance
areas.
51,52
The
guidance
document
states
that
emissions
budgets
in
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
areas
may
be
treated
as
not
constraining
for
purposes
of
conformity.
This
is
true
for
the
length
of
the
maintenance
periods
because
it
is
unreasonable
to
expect
that
the
area
would
experience
so
much
growth
in
that
period
that
a
violation
of
the
carbon
monoxide
NAAQS
would
result.

Once
a
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
has
been
approved
for
these
areas,
it
will
no
longer
be
necessary
for
the
Metropolitan
Planning
Organizations
to
perform
numerical
regional
analyses
to
demonstrate
transportation
conformity
for
Transportation
Plans
and
Transportation
Improvement
Programs.
The
State
is
aware
that
project­
level
carbon
monoxide
evaluation
of
transportation
projects
(
project­
level
conformity)
still
needs
to
be
performed
in
areas
with
approved
Limited
Maintenance
Plans.
As
stated
previously,
a
transportation
conformity
budget
will
still
be
required
for
the
northeastern
New
Jersey
carbon
monoxide
maintenance
area,
and
as
such,
a
revised
budget
is
proposed
as
part
of
this
submittal.

50
Ibid.
51
58
Fed.
Reg.,
62188
(
November
24,
1993).
52
58
Fed.
Reg.,
63214
(
November
30,
1993).
32
D.
8­
Hour
Carbon
Monoxide
Maintenance
Plan
The
first
ten­
year
maintenance
plans
and
contingency
measures
for
the
Camden
County
and
the
nine
not­
classified
carbon
monoxide
maintenance
areas
are
summarized
in
Table
XIV.

Table
XIV
New
Jersey
Carbon
Monoxide
Maintenance
Plan
and
Contingency
Measure
History
Camden
County
Nine
Not­
Classified
Areas
Maintenance
Plan
Federal
Motor
Vehicle
Control
Program
Reformulated
Gasoline
Basic
Inspection
and
Maintenance
Program
Maintenance
Plan
Federal
Motor
Vehicle
Control
Program
Reformulated
Gasoline
Basic
Inspection
and
Maintenance
Program
Contingency
Measure
Enhanced
Inspection
and
Maintenance
Program
Contingency
Measure
Enhanced
Inspection
and
Maintenance
Program
Triggering
Mechanism
for
Contingency
Measure
Contingency
measure
to
be
implemented
as
quickly
as
practicable
Triggering
Mechanism
for
Contingency
Measure
Contingency
measure
to
be
implemented
as
quickly
as
practicable
Each
of
these
elements
has
been
included
in
New
Jersey's
Second
Ten­
Year
Carbon
Monoxide
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
for
Camden
County
and
the
nine
not­
classified
areas.
This
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
consolidates
Maintenance
Plans
for
these
10
maintenance
areas.

1.
Attainment
Inventory
The
USEPA's
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
guidance
requires
states
to
develop
an
attainment
emission
inventory
identifying
a
level
of
emissions
sufficient
to
attain
the
NAAQS.
The
inventory
should
represent
"
typical
winter
day"
emissions
during
a
time
period
coincident
with
monitored
data
showing
attainment.
The
USEPA
required
New
Jersey
to
provide
an
attainment
inventory
(
point,
area,
and
mobile)
for
the
periodic
inventory
year
2002.
Table
XV
provides
a
summary
of
the
2002
wintertime
summary
carbon
monoxide
emissions
data
for
each
sector
for
each
county
included
in
one
of
the
ten
maintenance
areas.

New
Jersey's
carbon
monoxide
attainment
inventory
was
submitted
to
the
USEPA
on
September
29,
1995
(
1990
base
year
carbon
monoxide
emission
inventory).
53
Given
the
amount
of
time
that
has
passed
since
the
submittal
of
New
Jersey's
carbon
monoxide
attainment
inventory,
New
Jersey
thought
it
more
appropriate
to
submit
our
most
recent
carbon
monoxide
inventory
values
(
proposed
2002
inventory)
for
the
purposes
of
the
Limited
Maintenance
Plan.
Since
2002
is
a
calendar
year
that
had
monitoring
data
that
demonstrates
attainment,
no
projection
inventories
are
required
over
the
years
of
the
maintenance
period.
A
summary
of
the
wintertime
carbon
monoxide
emissions,
as
required
by
the
USEPA,
has
been
provided
in
this
submittal.
In
addition,
the
State's
entire
2002
base
year
inventory,
which
outlines
the
method
and
calculation
53
New
Jersey
Carbon
Monoxide
State
Implementation
Plan,
Redesignation
and
Maintenance
Plan
for
the
Nine
Not­
Classified
Areas,
New
Jersey
Department
of
Environmental
Protection,
September
29,
1995.
33
used
to
develop
the
carbon
monoxide
wintertime
inventory,
is
proposed
in
this
submittal.

County
level
data
was
used
because:

 
Estimating
emissions
from
areas
smaller
than
counties
would
not
be
statistically
significant.
 
Much
of
the
activity
data
upon
which
the
area
source
and
nonroad
mobile
source
inventory
estimates
are
based
were
developed
at
the
county­
level.
Therefore,
some
proportional
adjustment
factor
would
need
to
be
applied
to
the
county­
level
total
emissions
for
those
sectors
to
represent
the
selected
municipalities.
 
The
vehicle
miles
traveled
estimates
used
to
develop
the
onroad
mobile
source
inventory
would
require
similar
adjustments.
These
adjustments
would
necessarily
be
based
on
population
or
economic
statistical
data
and,
as
such,
would
simply
represent
a
proportion
of
the
county­
level
estimate
rather
than
specific
municipality
data.
 
All
growth
and
control
factors
applied
to
develop
the
future
year
inventories
are
estimated
on
a
county­
wide
basis.
Therefore,
the
same
proportional
change
in
emissions
would
be
applied
to
estimate
the
projected
future
year
inventories
regardless
of
the
assumptions
used
to
represent
the
attainment
year
base
case.

The
maintenance
areas
are
then
totaled
(
partial
counties
are
included
as
full
counties
for
summary
purposes).
Please
note
that
these
numbers
are
part
of
the
New
Jersey's
2002
Periodic
Emission
Inventory,
which
is
proposed
elsewhere
as
a
part
of
this
SIP
revision.
Details
on
how
the
wintertime
carbon
monoxide
numbers
for
each
sector
were
developed
are
outlined
in
the
State's
proposed
inventory
submittal.
Table
XV
New
Jersey
Wintertime
Carbon
Monoxide
Emissions
for
2002
(
tons
per
winter
day)

County
Point
Sources
Area
Sources
Onroad
Mobile
Sources
Nonroad
Mobile
Sources
TOTAL
Atlantic
0.48
62.98
153.15
21.57
238.18
Burlington
1.42
59.62
308.90
54.00
423.94
Mercer
1.46
14.32
224.90
43.01
283.69
Middlesex
8.27
6.34
531.04
107.85
653.50
Monmouth
0.72
30.42
423.04
78.43
532.61
Morris
1.23
46.59
393.14
97.30
538.26
Ocean
1.11
47.69
257.31
40.31
346.42
Salem
2.21
13.72
50.24
6.97
73.14
Somerset
1.17
11.65
211.93
47.55
272.30
Nine
Not­
Classified
Areas
Total
18.07
293.33
2,553.65
496.99
3,362.04
Camden
County
Area
Total
3.30
18.42
269.10
53.39
344.21
34
2.
Maintenance
Demonstration
The
1995
USEPA
guidance
document54
states
that
the
maintenance
demonstration
requirement
is
considered
to
be
satisfied
if
the
monitoring
data
show
that
the
area
is
meeting
the
air
quality
criteria
for
limited
maintenance
areas
(
7.65
parts
per
million
or
85
percent
of
the
carbon
monoxide
NAAQS).
Emission
projections
for
the
maintenance
period
are
not
required.
According
to
the
guidance
document,
the
USEPA
believes
that
if
an
area
begins
a
maintenance
period
at
or
below
85
percent
of
the
exceedance
levels,
then
the
continued
applicability
of
Prevention
of
Significant
Deterioration
requirements,
any
control
measure
already
in
the
SIP,
and
federal
measures
should
provide
adequate
assurance
of
maintenance
over
the
second
tenyear
maintenance
period.

Table
XIII
shows
that
all
of
the
design
values
are
well
below
7.65
parts
per
million.
As
such,
New
Jersey
is
not
required
to
include
emission
projections
in
the
Limited
Maintenance
Plan.
New
Jersey
commits
to
continued
implementation
of
its
Prevention
of
Significant
Deterioration
program
and
all
other
federal
and
state
measures
already
implemented
as
part
of
the
carbon
monoxide
SIP.

3.
Monitoring
Network
To
verify
that
carbon
monoxide
maintenance
areas
remain
in
attainment
over
the
maintenance
period,
New
Jersey
will
continue
to
operate
an
appropriate
air
monitoring
network.
New
Jersey's
current
carbon
monoxide
monitoring
network
is
shown
in
Figure
V.
The
air
monitoring
results
will
detect
any
changes
in
the
ambient
air
quality,
as
well
as
assist
the
State
in
determining
whether
or
not
it
is
necessary
to
implement
any
contingency
measures.
The
State
will
continue
to
work
with
the
USEPA
through
the
air
monitoring
network
review
process,
as
required
by
40
CFR
Part
58,
to
determine:

 
The
adequacy
of
the
carbon
monoxide
monitoring
network;
 
If
additional
monitoring
is
needed;
and,
 
When
monitoring
can
be
discontinued.

These
determinations
must
be
consistent
with
the
section
105
air
grant
process.
55
Air
monitoring
data
will
continue
to
be
quality
assured
according
to
the
requirements
in
the
USEPA
regulations.
56
4.
Verification
of
Continued
Attainment
To
track
the
progress
of
the
maintenance
plan,
the
State
will
review
the
carbon
monoxide
concentrations
from
its
monitoring
sites
each
year.
If
design
values
in
any
maintenance
area
exceed
7.65
parts
per
million
(
the
eligibility
requirement
for
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
areas),

54
Ibid
55
42
§
U.
S.
C.
7405.
56
40
CFR
58.
35
Figure
V
New
Jersey
Carbon
Monoxide
Monitoring
Network
(
2004)
36
the
NJDEP
will
coordinate
with
USEPA
Region
II
to:

 
Verify
the
validity
of
the
data;
 
Evaluate
whether
the
data
should
be
excluded
based
on
an
"
exceptional
event";
and,
 
If
warranted
based
on
the
data
review,
develop
a
full
maintenance
plan
for
the
affected
maintenance
area(
s),
if
deemed
necessary.

5.
Contingency
Plan
42
U.
S.
C.
§
7505a(
d)
requires
that
maintenance
plans
include
contingency
provisions.
The
purpose
of
the
contingency
provisions
is
to
assure
that
any
violations
of
the
NAAQS
that
occur
after
the
redesignation
of
an
area
to
attainment
will
be
corrected
promptly.
57
The
USEPA
issued
guidance
describing
the
contents
of
the
contingency
plan.
58
This
guidance
specifies
that
the
contingency
plan
should
clearly
identify
the
measure(
s)
to
be
adopted,
a
schedule
and
procedure
for
adoption
and
implementation,
and
a
specific
time
limit
for
action
by
the
State.
The
USEPA
has
also
recommended
that
the
State
specify
triggers
that
will
be
used
to
determine
when
the
contingency
measure(
s)
need
to
be
implemented.
The
triggers
specified
in
the
previous
Maintenance
Plan
are
included
in
this
proposed
Limited
Maintenance
Plan.

Contingency
Measure
Triggers
If
air
quality
monitoring
data
indicate
that
either
of
the
carbon
monoxide
NAAQS
were
exceeded,
New
Jersey
will
first
analyze
available
data
regarding
the
air
quality,
meteorology,
and
related
activities
in
the
area
to
determine
the
cause
of
the
violation.
After
this
analysis
is
complete,
if
it
is
determined
that
the
violation
was
caused
by
non­
local
motor
vehicle
usage
(
i.
e.,
not
due
to
a
local
traffic
problem,
a
special
event,
or
stationary
sources,
and
not
occurring
during
the
same
meteorological
episode
as
the
first
exceedance),
then
the
State
will
institute
the
contingency
measures
described
in
this
SIP
revision.

Contingency
Measures
and
Timeframes
42
U.
S.
C.
§
7505a(
d)
requires
that,
at
a
minimum,
a
contingency
plan
include
reinstatement
of
all
measures
that
were
contained
in
the
SIP
before
redesignation
of
the
area
as
an
attainment
area.
Table
XIV
outlines
the
contingency
measures
from
the
original
maintenance
plan
for
the
area.
The
plans
included
implementation
of
an
enhanced
I/
M
program.
This
program
is
fully
operational
and
the
State
commits
to
continue
to
meet
the
performance
standard
for
an
enhanced
I/
M
program
in
an
effort
to
maintain
the
carbon
monoxide
NAAQS.

The
State
continues
to
commit
to
implementing
a
program
to
reduce
truck
idling
emissions.
If
it
becomes
necessary
to
reduce
carbon
monoxide
levels
in
the
future,
New
Jersey
will
work
with
the
local
Metropolitan
Planning
Organizations
to
implement
transportation
control
measures
such
as
Transportation
Demand
Management
measures,
arterial
and
signal
improvement
projects,
bicycle
projects,
and
various
transit
related
projects.
Since
the
57
42
U.
S.
C.
§
7505a(
d).
58
USEPA,
Memorandum
from
John
Calcagni,
Director,
Air
Quality
Management
Division,
to
Regional
Air
Directors,
"
Procedures
for
Processing
Requests
to
Redesignate
Areas
to
Attainment,"
September
4,
1992,
page
12.
37
implementation
of
potential
contingency
measures
would
not
be
expected
to
take
place
until
well
in
the
future,
providing
the
specific
details
of
the
measures
is
not
practicable.
The
most
appropriate
contingency
measures
may
be
significantly
different
from
the
measures
mentioned
above
due
to
technological,
societal,
economic,
and
political
factors
that
are
impossible
to
predict.

6.
Transportation
Conformity
According
to
the
1995
USEPA
guidance
document
for
Limited
Maintenance
Plans59,
the
Transportation
Conformity
Rule
and
the
General
Conformity
Rule
apply
to
nonattainment
areas
and
maintenance
areas
operating
under
maintenance
plans.
60,61
The
guidance
document
also
states
that
emission
budgets
in
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
areas
may
be
treated
as
not
constraining
for
the
length
of
the
initial
maintenance
period
because
it
is
unreasonable
to
expect
that
such
an
area
would
experience
so
much
growth
in
that
period
that
a
violation
of
the
carbon
monoxide
NAAQS
would
result.
New
Jersey's
consolidated
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
covers
the
second
maintenance
periods
for
two
of
New
Jersey's
carbon
monoxide
maintenance
areas.
According
to
correspondence
from
USEPA
Region
II,
a
budget
test
(
outlined
in
the
Transportation
Conformity
Rule)
is
not
required
for
limited
maintenance
plans.
The
NJDEP
will
comply
with
the
requirement
to
conduct
a
project­
level
carbon
monoxide
evaluation
of
transportation
projects
(
project­
level
conformity).

Consistent
with
the
discussion,
the
NJDEP
will
use
the
interagency
consultation
process
to:

1)
Inform
the
New
Jersey
Department
of
Transportation
and
Metropolitan
Planning
Organizations
that,
upon
approval
of
the
limited
maintenance
plans,
carbon
monoxide
emission
budgets
will
no
longer
be
constraining
for
transportation
conformity
because
of
the
low
levels
of
emissions
and
expected
growth
rates
during
the
duration
of
the
limited
maintenance
periods.
Once
the
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
is
approved,
regional
transportation
conformity
is
presumed
to
be
satisfied,
with
no
need
for
quantitative
comparisons
to
budgets
for
the
second
ten­
year
maintenance
periods.
2)
Ensure
that
project­
level
carbon
monoxide
evaluations
of
transportation
projects
(
i.
e.,
project­
level
conformity,
as
described
in
40
CFR
93.116)
are
carried
out
in
each
area
as
part
of
environmental
reviews.
62
A
transportation
conformity
budget
is
still
required
for
the
Northeastern
New
Jersey
carbon
monoxide
maintenance
area,
and
as
such,
a
revised
budget
is
being
proposed
as
part
of
this
submittal.

59
USEPA,
Memorandum
from
Joseph
Paisie
(
OAQPS)
to
Regional
Air
Branch
Chiefs,
"
Limited
Maintenance
Plan
Option
for
Non­
Classifiable
CO
Nonattainment
Areas,"
October
6,
1995.
60
58
Fed.
Reg.,
62188
(
November
24,
1993).
61
58
Fed.
Reg.
63214
(
November
30,
1993).
62
Environmental
review
documents
are
prepared
when
required
by
the
National
Environmental
Policy
Act.
38
IV.
2002
Periodic
Emission
Inventory
A.
Background
1.
Statutory
and
Regulatory
Background
42
U.
S.
C.
§
7410
(
a)(
2)(
F)
requires
the
submission
by
states
to
the
USEPA
of
periodic
reports
on
the
nature
and
amounts
of
emissions
and
emissions
related
data.
For
example,
42
U.
S.
C.
§
7511a.(
a)(
3)(
A)
required
states
to
submit
an
emission
inventory
every
three
years
for
1­
hour
ozone
nonattainment
areas
beginning
in
1993.
The
inventories
are
required
to
include
all
ozone
precursors
including
VOCs,
NOx,
and
carbon
monoxide.
Similarly,
42
U.
S.
C.
§
7512a.(
a)(
5)
required
States
to
submit
an
inventory
every
three
years
for
carbon
monoxide
nonattainment
areas
for
the
same
source
classes
as
ozone,
except
biogenic
sources.
As
part
of
the
NOx
SIP
Call
Rule
(
40
CFR
51.121),
the
USEPA
established
emissions
reporting
requirements
to
be
included
in
the
SIPs
submitted
by
the
affected
states.

In
2002,
the
USEPA
promulgated
the
Consolidated
Emission
Reporting
Rule,
40
CFR
Part
51,
Subpart
A,
that
 
Consolidated
the
various
emissions
reporting
requirements
that
already
existed;
 
Established
new
reporting
requirements
related
to
PM2.5,
its
precursors
(
NH3,
SOx,
NOx,
and
VOC)
and
regional
haze;
 
Established
new
requirements
for
the
statewide
reporting
of
area
source
and
mobile
source
emissions;
and,
 
Required
two
types
of
inventories
 
annual
inventories
and
three
year
cycle
inventories.

Figures
VI
and
VII
represent
New
Jersey's
nonattainment
areas
for
8­
hour
ozone
and
PM2.5,
respectively,
and
Figure
IV
represents
the
maintenance
areas
for
carbon
monoxide.
The
2002
periodic
emission
inventory
is
based
on
the
8­
hour
ozone
standard
(
0.08
parts
per
million)
as
the
1­
hour
ozone
standard
(
0.12
parts
per
million)
was
revoked
by
the
USEPA
on
June
15,
2005.63
2.
Emission
Inventory
Overview
The
2002
Periodic
Emission
Inventory
is
a
compilation
of
the
emissions
from
sources
of
biogenic
(
natural)
and
anthropogenic
(
human­
made)
volatile
organic
chemical
(
VOC),
oxides
of
nitrogen
(
NOx),
carbon
monoxide
(
CO),
particulate
matter
less
than
10
micrometers
in
diameter
(
PM10),
particulate
matter
five
micrometers
or
less
in
diameter
(
PM2.5),
sulfur
dioxide
(
SO2),
and
ammonia
(
NH3)
in
the
outdoor
air.
64
The
sources
are
divided
into
five
sectors
and
each
making
up
one
component
of
the
inventory:
point
sources,
area
(
nonpoint)
sources,
onroad
sources,
nonroad
sources,
and
biogenic
sources.

63
70
Fed.
Reg.
44470
(
August
3,
2005).
64
SO2
has
been
reported
in
the
inventory
instead
of
SOx
as
required
in
the
Consolidated
Emissions
Reporting
Rule
because
the
USEPA
MOBILE
and
NONROAD
models
and
the
majority
of
USEPA
guidance
on
emission
factors
is
based
on
SO2,
not
SOx.
In
addition,
the
USEPA
National
Emissions
Inventory
(
NEI)
reports
SO2.
39
Figure
VI
DE
NJ
CT
NY
PA
MD
YORK
ULSTER
BERKS
PIKE
SUSSEX
KENT
WAYNE
SULLIVAN
ORANGE
SUFFOLK
LUZERNE
BUCKS
OCEAN
PERRY
LITCHFIELD
CHESTER
LANCASTER
DUTCHESS
ADAMS
DELAWARE
MONROE
HARTFORD
SUSSEX
FAIRFIELD
BURLINGTON
SCHUYLKILL
MORRIS
CECIL
DAUPHIN
ATLANTIC
BALTIMORE
NEW
HAVEN
SALEM
KENT
COLUMBIA
LEHIGH
CARBON
HARFORD
WYOMING
CUMBERLAND
MONMOUTH
LEBANON
CUMBERLAND
MIDDLESEX
NASSAU
PUTNAM
WICOMICO
WARREN
DORCHESTER
NEW
CASTLE
TALBOT
HUNTERDON
MONTGOMERY
CAROLINE
LACKAWANNA
WESTCHESTER
BERGEN
MIDDLESEX
HOWARD
SOMERSET
ANNE
ARUNDEL
CAMDEN
MERCER
CALVERT
NORTHAMPTON
GLOUCESTER
NORTHUMBERLAND
PASSAIC
GREENE
QUEEN
ANNES
CAPE
MAY
ESSEX
ROCKLAND
DELAWARE
UNION
QUEENS
PHILADELPHIA
KINGS
HUDSON
WORCESTER
BRONX
RICHMOND
8­
hour
Ozone
Standard
Multi­
State
Nonattainment
Areas
Geographic
Areas
Northern
New
Jersey
­
New
York
City
­
Southwestern
Connecticut
Area
Philadelphia
­
Southern
and
Central
New
Jersey
40
Figure
VII
NJ
CT
NY
PA
MD
DE
YORK
BERKS
PIKE
KENT
ORANGE
SUFFOLK
LUZERNE
BUCKS
OCEAN
CHESTER
LANCASTER
MONROE
SUSSEX
FAIRFIELD
BURLINGTON
SCHUYLKILL
MORRIS
CECIL
DAUPHIN
WAYNE
ATLANTIC
BALTIMORE
NEW
HAVEN
SALEM
KENT
COLUMBIA
LEHIGH
SULLIVAN
CARBON
HARFORD
WARREN
WYOMING
MONMOUTH
LEBANON
CUMBERLAND
HUNTERDON
MIDDLESEX
MONTGOMERY
LACKAWANNA
NASSAU
WESTCHESTER
BERGEN
PUTNAM
MIDDLESEX
CAMDEN
MERCER
DUTCHESS
NORTHAMPTON
PASSAIC
HOWARD
LITCHFIELD
ESSEX
DELAWARE
UNION
ULSTER
NEW
CASTLE
SOMERSET
GLOUCESTER
NORTHUMBERLAND
QUEEN
ANNES
CAPE
MAY
ANNE
ARUNDEL
ROCKLAND
PERRY
CAROLINE
QUEENS
HARTFORD
PHILADELPHIA
KINGS
ADAMS
CUMBERLAND
HUDSON
BRONX
RICHMOND
TALBOT
SUSSEX
USEPA
Designations
of
Multi­
State
Nonattainment
Areas
for
PM2.5
Geographic
Areas
In
Attainment
NY/
NJ/
LI/
CT
Nonattainment
Area
PA/
NJ/
DE
Nonattainment
Area
41
This
report
includes
the
2002
periodic
emission
inventory
for
the
parameters
listed
in
Table
XVI.
Appendix
D
contains
a
description
of
the
2002
periodic
emission
inventory
and
the
methodologies
used
for
collecting
and
calculating
emission
data
for
New
Jersey
for
2002.
This
appendix
also
contains
twenty­
five
(
25)
attachments
that
provide
supplemental
information
for
evaluating
the
inventory.

Table
XVI
2002
Inventories
Prepared
Summer
Day(
1)
Winter
Day(
2)
Annual
Emissions
VOC
 
 

NOx
 
 

CO
 
 
 

PM10
 
 

PM2.5
 
 

SO2
 

NH3
 

NOTES:
(
1)
Average
daily
emissions
for
a
typical
summer
work
week
day.
(
2)
Average
daily
emissions
for
a
typical
winter
work
week
day.

3.
Emission
Inventory
Summary
A
summary
of
the
2002
Periodic
Emission
Inventory
for
New
Jersey
is
presented
in
Table
XVII
by
pollutant
and
source
sector.
Table
XVIII
presents
the
inventory
data
by
pollutant
and
county.
Table
XIX
presents
the
inventory
data
by
pollutant,
source
sector,
and
county.
A
series
of
figures
showing
the
top
fifteen
pollutants
by
Source
Classification
Code
(
SCC)
for
each
pollutant
and
source
sector
can
be
found
in
Appendix
D,
Attachment
1.

Note,
the
summary
tables,
graphs,
and
the
detailed
county
source
sector
tables
found
in
the
attachments
to
this
report
contain
adjusted
values
for
fugitive
dust.
Discussion
on
the
fugitive
dust
inventory
and
the
adjustment
can
be
found
in
Appendix
D,
Attachment
2.
42
Table
XVII
2002
Statewide
Emission
Inventory
by
Source
Sector
and
Pollutant
VOC
NOx
Source
Sector
Tons
per
Summer
Day
Tons
per
Year
%
of
Total
Annual
Inventory
Tons
per
Summer
Day
Tons
per
Year
%
of
Total
Annual
Inventory
Point
113.15
30,169
6.41%
280.36
52,121
14.77%
Area
369.83
127,673
27.12%
35.92
26,742
7.58%
Onroad
274.74
106,589
22.65%
558.66
206,280
58.44%
Nonroad
220.60
70,407
14.96%
231.56
66,443
18.82%
Biogenic
371.95
135,851
28.86%
3.78
1,382
0.39%
Total
in
State
1,350.27
470,689
1,110.28
352,968
Carbon
Monoxide
PM10
(
1)

Source
Sector
Tons
per
Summer
Day
Tons
per
Year
%
of
Total
Annual
Inventory
Tons
per
Year
%
of
Total
Annual
Inventory
Point
89.35
13,254
0.60%
5,555
13.37%
Area
66.45
94,067
4.26%
24,760
59.61%
Onroad
2,856.37
1,421,004
64.40%
4,718
11.36%
Nonroad
2,497.80
665,944
30.18%
6,505
15.66%
Biogenic
34.09
12,450
0.56%
0
0.00%
Total
in
State
5,544.06
2,206,719
41,538
PM2.5
(
1)
SO2
NH3
Source
Sector
Tons
per
Year
%
of
Total
Inventory
Tons
per
Year
%
of
Total
Inventory
Tons
per
Year
%
of
Total
Inventory
Point
4,868
16.02%
61,231
64.68%
38
0.15%
Area
16,230
53.42%
10,876
11.49%
8,005
31.38%
Onroad
3,361
11.07%
5,793
6.12%
7,469
29.27%
Nonroad
5,922
19.49%
16,772
17.71%
970
3.80%
Biogenic
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
9,032
35.40%
Total
in
State
30,381
94,672
25,514
NOTE:
(
1)
These
totals
include
adjusted
emissions
from
fugitive
dust
categories.
See
Attachment
2
for
further
discussion.
43
Table
XVIII
2002
Statewide
Emission
Inventory
by
County
and
Pollutant
VOC
NOx
Carbon
Monoxide
County
Tons
per
Summer
Day
Tons
per
Year
Tons
per
Summer
Day
Tons
per
Year
Tons
per
Summer
Day
Tons
per
Year
Atlantic
74.67
27,426
33.81
9,706
231.77
85,555
Bergen
105.32
34,106
94.16
34,452
687.72
261,862
Burlington
87.21
31,814
58.36
18,214
297.03
126,456
Camden
65
22,629
41.44
15,119
270.08
107,408
Cape
May
52.34
19,481
34.5
8,636
138.02
50,041
Cumberland
54.2
19,375
30.04
7,829
112.23
40,088
Essex
68.06
22,580
89.32
29,578
377.37
152,468
Gloucester
84.24
30,076
42.19
14,615
183.71
74,719
Hudson
46.01
15,111
95.68
25,367
167.29
67,897
Hunterdon
28.22
10,636
32.07
8,651
122.31
50,996
Mercer
46.45
16,068
81.81
25,295
231.18
90,194
Middlesex
104.31
34,222
123.5
33,048
554.28
212,020
Monmouth
91.54
32,769
57.2
21,301
444.87
180,921
Morris
69.79
25,153
50.34
18,978
443.06
174,989
Ocean
103.91
37,326
38.56
13,676
314.69
125,240
Passaic
49.71
17,014
34.46
12,682
206.71
85,648
Salem
34.63
11,726
31.01
7,727
74.94
26,533
Somerset
42.74
14,963
36.61
12,602
228.79
88,817
Sussex
34.9
14,544
10.86
4,140
84.05
43,747
Union
77.8
22,468
73.69
23,906
286.09
117,897
Warren
29.22
11,204
20.7
7,451
87.9
43,226
Total
in
State
1350.27
470,689
1110.28
352,968
5544.06
2,206,719
44
Table
XVIII
(
cont.)
2002
Statewide
Emission
Inventory
by
County
and
Pollutant
County
PM10
(
1)

Tons
per
Year
PM2.5
(
1)

Tons
per
Year
SO2
Tons
per
Year
NH3
Tons
per
Year
Atlantic
2,282
1,889
886
823
Bergen
2,164
1,540
2155
2390
Burlington
3,209
2,362
3568
1535
Camden
1,823
1,382
2038
1238
Cape
May
1,468
1,254
13409
334
Cumberland
1,467
1,201
3281
652
Essex
1,682
1,280
4597
1934
Gloucester
2,103
1,514
7275
1006
Hudson
2,690
1,825
21653
1325
Hunterdon
1,426
908
695
934
Mercer
1,613
1,062
15594
1032
Middlesex
2,561
1,643
2395
2122
Monmouth
2,520
1,781
1947
1725
Morris
2,473
1,812
1529
1464
Ocean
3,091
2,341
1196
1291
Passaic
1,242
881
974
1126
Salem
1,234
927
5504
657
Somerset
1,435
797
744
1092
Sussex
1,849
1,449
733
674
Union
1,569
1,330
3856
1467
Warren
1,629
1,205
643
688
Total
in
State
41,538
30,381
94672
25514
NOTES:
(
1)
These
totals
include
adjusted
emissions
from
fugitive
dust
categories.
See
Attachment
2
of
this
report
for
further
discussion.
45
Table
XIX
2002
Statewide
Emission
Inventory
by
County
and
Source
Sector
VOC
Tons
per
Summer
Day
VOC
Tons
per
Year
County
Point
Sources
Area
Sources
Onroad
Sources
Nonroad
Sources
Biogenic
Point
Sources
Area
Sources
Onroad
Sources
Nonroad
Sources
Biogenic
Atlantic
0.15
11.04
12.85
10.25
40.38
52
5,492
3,613
3,521
14,748
Bergen
5.72
36.86
36.09
22.05
4.60
773
11,243
14,048
6,361
1,681
Burlington
4.02
17.54
15.80
10.01
39.84
927
7,057
6,278
3,000
14,552
Camden
1.23
22.68
13.80
7.23
20.06
453
7,228
5,512
2,110
7,326
Cape
May
0.20
5.26
4.72
22.61
19.55
39
2,474
1,348
8,480
7,140
Cumberland
0.46
8.93
5.37
11.03
28.41
102
3,208
1,492
4,196
10,377
Essex
2.95
31.53
18.26
11.92
3.40
791
9,568
7,238
3,739
1,244
Gloucester
32.01
20.39
9.10
5.91
16.83
11,560
7,032
3,650
1,686
6,148
Hudson
7.33
21.09
9.10
5.22
3.27
2,104
6,628
3,567
1,617
1,195
Hunterdon
0.64
5.49
5.99
3.66
12.44
144
2,468
2,441
1,038
4,545
Mercer
2.13
13.06
11.60
7.01
12.65
446
4,445
4,636
1,922
4,619
Middlesex
16.08
34.87
26.00
14.58
12.78
4,366
10,594
10,478
4,115
4,669
Monmouth
1.37
24.65
22.26
21.26
22.00
287
8,477
8,973
6,996
8,036
Morris
1.27
20.81
18.87
15.09
13.75
309
7,947
7,662
4,211
5,024
Ocean
0.26
24.01
14.30
21.54
43.80
76
7,746
5,792
7,714
15,998
Passaic
1.99
19.84
10.22
6.62
11.04
253
6,537
4,109
2,081
4,034
Salem
4.92
3.47
4.23
3.37
18.64
1,034
1,516
1,205
1,162
6,809
Somerset
0.73
12.29
10.65
6.87
12.20
224
4,075
4,311
1,898
4,455
Sussex
0.25
5.69
4.62
3.86
20.48
38
3,656
1,881
1,490
7,479
Union
26.56
25.26
15.92
7.75
2.31
5,382
7,652
6,354
2,237
843
Warren
2.88
5.07
4.99
2.78
13.50
809
2,631
2,001
832
4,931
Total
in
State
113.15
369.83
274.74
220.60
371.95
30,169
127,673
106,589
70,407
135,851
46
Table
XIX
(
cont.)
 
2002
Statewide
Emission
Inventory
by
County
and
Source
Sector
NOx
Tons
per
Summer
Day
NOx
Tons
per
Year
County
Point
Sources
Area
Sources
Onroad
Sources
Nonroad
Sources
Biogenic
Point
Sources
Area
Sources
Onroad
Sources
Nonroad
Sources
Biogenic
Atlantic
1.67
1.17
24.50
6.26
0.21
129
964
6,764
1,771
78
Bergen
3.64
3.83
63.24
23.38
0.07
988
2,815
23,917
6,707
25
Burlington
12.35
1.77
31.10
12.88
0.26
1,273
1,424
11,644
3,776
97
Camden
2.69
2.10
27.00
9.44
0.21
776
1,523
10,074
2,669
77
Cape
May
19.15
0.42
8.82
5.92
0.19
3,819
357
2,433
1,959
68
Cumberland
10.50
0.65
10.61
7.94
0.34
1,778
469
2,883
2,574
125
Essex
16.18
3.31
44.06
25.70
0.07
2,441
2,436
16,537
8,137
27
Gloucester
14.48
1.01
18.50
8.01
0.19
4,645
800
6,899
2,200
71
Hudson
51.61
2.24
21.05
20.71
0.07
9,776
1,735
7,853
5,976
27
Hunterdon
9.47
0.54
17.17
4.70
0.19
491
424
6,444
1,223
69
Mercer
47.87
1.72
22.70
9.32
0.20
13,034
1,257
8,505
2,427
72
Middlesex
44.47
3.33
58.00
17.54
0.16
3,651
2,343
22,147
4,849
58
Monmouth
0.86
2.23
38.15
15.74
0.22
240
1,806
14,860
4,316
79
Morris
1.18
2.40
35.06
11.58
0.12
284
1,752
13,748
3,151
43
Ocean
3.68
2.39
24.65
7.57
0.27
395
1,507
9,538
2,138
98
Passaic
0.68
1.79
23.01
8.88
0.10
122
1,361
8,748
2,413
38
Salem
15.26
0.31
11.91
3.21
0.32
3,267
227
3,185
932
116
Somerset
3.60
1.44
23.85
7.57
0.15
313
1,048
9,090
2,097
54
Sussex
0.21
0.57
7.47
2.46
0.15
39
495
2,936
615
55
Union
18.88
2.26
32.22
20.25
0.08
4,080
1,621
12,294
5,883
28
Warren
1.93
0.47
15.60
2.48
0.22
580
379
5,782
631
79
Total
in
State
280.36
35.92
558.66
231.56
3.78
52,121
26,742
206,280
66,443
1,382
47
Table
XIX
(
cont.)
 
2002
Statewide
Emission
Inventory
by
County
and
Source
Sector
Carbon
Monoxide
Tons
per
Summer
Day
Carbon
Monoxide
Tons
per
Year
County
Point
Sources
Area
Sources
Onroad
Sources
Nonroad
Sources
Biogenic
Point
Sources
Area
Sources
Onroad
Sources
Nonroad
Sources
Biogenic
Atlantic
0.36
2.66
155.53
70.26
2.96
66
10,726
53,885
19,798
1,080
Bergen
2.36
2.07
324.50
358.25
0.54
619
1,453
166,589
93,002
199
Burlington
1.48
1.97
168.90
121.35
3.33
413
9,709
83,768
31,350
1,216
Camden
3.28
6.89
145.90
112.44
1.57
1,154
3,789
72,489
29,402
574
Cape
May
2.18
0.66
53.58
80.06
1.54
311
4,145
18,758
26,265
562
Cumberland
1.56
1.13
56.91
50.35
2.28
126
3,196
19,994
15,941
831
Essex
3.61
2.40
187.93
182.98
0.45
624
1,306
96,967
53,407
164
Gloucester
3.27
1.54
99.80
77.69
1.41
1,029
4,513
49,458
19,203
516
Hudson
9.42
1.22
87.49
68.72
0.44
2,058
896
44,767
20,015
161
Hunterdon
6.43
1.03
64.94
48.31
1.60
259
3,973
34,283
11,896
585
Mercer
1.51
1.37
122.70
104.18
1.42
323
2,567
61,101
25,685
518
Middlesex
34.20
2.54
287.54
228.84
1.16
3,034
1,309
149,288
57,965
424
Monmouth
1.28
1.79
227.22
212.60
1.98
381
5,252
118,952
55,614
722
Morris
2.24
2.35
209.14
227.91
1.42
266
8,121
109,947
56,136
519
Ocean
1.21
29.78
135.96
143.85
3.89
271
10,563
72,072
40,914
1,420
Passaic
0.40
1.23
105.86
98.09
1.13
68
2,985
55,414
26,769
412
Salem
2.28
0.57
49.04
21.42
1.63
487
2,389
17,071
5,991
595
Somerset
5.96
1.16
112.52
107.75
1.40
226
2,079
59,270
26,731
511
Sussex
0.33
1.80
42.35
37.57
2.00
83
8,995
23,055
10,883
731
Union
3.87
1.11
162.44
118.31
0.36
1,012
794
84,178
31,780
133
Warren
2.12
1.19
56.12
26.89
1.58
444
5,306
29,700
7,198
578
Total
in
State
89.35
66.45
2,856.37
2,497.80
34.09
13,254
94,067
1,421,004
665,944
12,451
48
Table
XIX
(
cont.)
 
2002
Statewide
Emission
Inventory
by
County
and
Source
Sector
PM10
(
1)

Tons
per
Year
PM2.5
(
1)

Tons
per
Year
County
Point
Sources
Area
Sources
Onroad
Sources
Nonroad
Sources
Biogenic
Point
Sources
Area
Sources
Onroad
Sources
Nonroad
Sources
Biogenic
Atlantic
17
1,863
154
248
NA
19
1,541
104
225
NA
Bergen
135
981
524
524
NA
149
537
376
478
NA
Burlington
318
2,145
275
471
NA
308
1,448
193
413
NA
Camden
126
1,210
238
249
NA
233
754
167
228
NA
Cape
May
102
799
58
509
NA
109
637
40
468
NA
Cumberland
266
721
73
407
NA
280
495
52
374
NA
Essex
203
646
389
444
NA
185
411
291
393
NA
Gloucester
531
1,169
161
242
NA
426
754
112
222
NA
Hudson
1,705
431
179
375
NA
1,077
269
134
345
NA
Hunterdon
50
1,115
148
113
NA
50
644
111
103
NA
Mercer
221
967
201
224
NA
188
530
141
203
NA
Middlesex
537
1,162
486
376
NA
483
467
347
346
NA
Monmouth
48
1,575
352
545
NA
55
981
244
501
NA
Morris
46
1,813
305
309
NA
39
1,284
209
280
NA
Ocean
39
2,377
229
446
NA
38
1,734
160
409
NA
Passaic
18
835
195
194
NA
19
543
141
178
NA
Salem
435
590
77
132
NA
371
377
57
122
NA
Somerset
76
984
211
164
NA
55
441
152
149
NA
Sussex
6
1,667
77
99
NA
5
1,301
54
89
NA
Union
434
512
261
362
NA
540
272
185
333
NA
Warren
240
1,195
123
71
NA
240
809
92
64
NA
Total
in
State
5,555
24,760
4,718
6,505
NA
4,868
16,230
3,361
5,922
NA
NOTES:

(
1)
These
totals
include
adjusted
emissions
from
fugitive
dust
categories.
See
Attachment
2
of
this
report
for
further
discussion.
49
Table
XIX
(
cont.)
 
2002
Statewide
Emission
Inventory
by
County
and
Source
Sector
SO2
Tons
per
Year
NH3
Tons
per
Year
County
Point
Sources
Area
Sources
Onroad
Sources
Nonroad
Sources
Biogenic
Point
Sources
Area
Sources
Onroad
Sources
Nonroad
Sources
Biogenic
Atlantic
10
498
202
176
NA
0
184
297
13
329
Bergen
82
819
634
620
NA
0
543
821
163
863
Burlington
286
459
361
2,462
NA
0
522
454
39
520
Camden
162
506
313
1,057
NA
0
281
393
46
518
Cape
May
12,178
163
75
993
NA
5
86
107
6
130
Cumberland
665
412
89
2,115
NA
1
310
118
20
203
Essex
2,110
1,078
429
980
NA
0
598
492
82
762
Gloucester
5,431
390
211
1,243
NA
0
445
265
22
274
Hudson
19,250
625
196
1,582
NA
14
461
222
56
572
Hunterdon
18
391
163
123
NA
0
569
187
14
164
Mercer
14,379
450
264
501
NA
3
310
331
41
347
Middlesex
504
689
590
612
NA
11
492
765
108
746
Monmouth
55
510
453
929
NA
0
399
628
47
651
Morris
52
798
403
276
NA
0
273
572
75
544
Ocean
38
652
290
216
NA
0
258
396
21
616
Passaic
26
494
231
223
NA
0
264
292
65
505
Salem
4,590
156
85
673
NA
1
463
97
7
89
Somerset
41
273
250
180
NA
0
423
317
43
309
Sussex
0
566
98
69
NA
0
296
135
8
235
Union
1,253
602
321
1,680
NA
3
456
425
82
501
Warren
101
345
134
63
NA
0
371
152
12
153
Total
in
State
61,231
10,876
5,793
16,772
NA
38
8,005
7,469
970
9,032
50
4.
Emissions
Comparison
Summary
A
comparison
of
the
1996
man­
made
emission
inventory
to
the
2002
man­
made
emission
inventory
for
New
Jersey
is
presented
in
Table
XX,
by
pollutant
and
source
sector.
The
1996
inventory
was
chosen
for
comparison,
because
the
1999
area
source
inventory
and
portions
of
the
1999
nonroad
inventory
were
projections
of
the
1996
base
year
inventory,
therefore
are
also
a
reflection
of
the
growth
factors
chosen,
in
addition
to
the
methodologies
used
to
calculated
emissions.
This
comparison
shows
the
following:

 
Total
man­
made
VOC,
summer
tons
per
day:
Overall
slight
decrease,
decreases
in
point
and
onroad,
increases
in
area
and
nonroad;
 
Total
man­
made
NOx
summer
tons
per
day:
Overall
slight
increase,
slight
decreases
in
point,
area
and
nonroad,
increase
in
onroad;
and,
 
Total
man­
made
CO
summer
tons
per
day:
Overall
increase,
increases
in
point,
area,
nonroad
and
onroad.

More
detailed
discussions
of
increases
and
decreases
in
emissions
are
included
in
the
individual
sector
comparisons
in
Appendix
D.
Decreases
are
due
primarily
to
federal
and
state
rules
that
control
emissions
from
industries
such
as
the
NOx
Budget
Program;
revisions
in
federal
engine
standards;
reformulated
gasoline;
and
basic
inspection
and
maintenance
programs.
Increases
are
due
primarily
to
population
growth
and
increases
in
vehicle
miles
traveled;
changes
in
calculation
and
model
methodologies
and
inputs;
and
the
addition
of
new
emission
sources
not
previously
included
in
the
inventory.
Table
XX
1996
and
2002
Statewide
Emission
Inventory
by
Source
Sector
and
Pollutant
VOC
NOx
CO
Source
Sector
1996
Tons
per
Summer
Day
2002
Tons
per
Summer
Day
1996
Tons
per
Summer
Day
2002
Tons
per
Summer
Day
1996
Tons
per
Summer
Day
2002
Tons
per
Summer
Day
Point
173.22
113.15
291.05
280.36
78.45
89.35
Area
304.98
369.83
39.66
35.92
26.89
66.45
Onroad
309.01
274.74
453.82
558.66
2,182.99
2,856.37
Nonroad
203.73
220.60
269.24
231.56
2,152.25
2,497.80
Total
in
State
990.94
978.32
1,053.77
1106.50
4,440.58
5,509.97
V.
Public
Participation
New
Jersey
is
planning
on
holding
a
public
hearing
on
the
proposed
SIP
revisions.
Notice
of
the
hearing
will
be
published
in
several
newspapers
throughout
the
State
before
the
date
of
the
public
hearing.
A
complete
description
of
the
public
hearing
process,
the
comments
received
and
New
Jersey's
response
to
those
comments
will
be
included
in
the
final
SIP
document.