Document ID: SEC-2020-1870-0001
Agency: sec
Document Type: Notice
Title: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes: Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.
Posted Date: 2020-11-20T05:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 225 (Friday, November 20, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74477-74482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-25615]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-90432; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2020-053]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice 
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To 
Amend the Fee Schedule

November 16, 2020.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on November 2, 2020, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or 
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``EDGX'') is filing 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a proposed 
rule change to amend the fee schedule. The text of the proposed rule 
change is provided in Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the 
Exchange's website (http://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at 
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The

[[Page 74478]]

Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C 
below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its fee schedule applicable to its 
equities trading platform (``EDGX Equities'') by: (1) Eliminating 
certain volume tiers; (2) updating the Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers; 
and (3) updating the Retail Volume Tiers, effective November 2, 2020.
    The Exchange first notes that it operates in a highly competitive 
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to 
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be 
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. More specifically, the 
Exchange is only one of 16 registered equities exchanges, as well as a 
number of alternative trading systems and other off-exchange venues 
that do not have similar self-regulatory responsibilities under the 
Exchange Act, to which market participants may direct their order flow. 
Based on publicly available information,\3\ no single registered 
equities exchange has more than 18% of the market share. Thus, in such 
a low-concentrated and highly competitive market, no single equities 
exchange possesses significant pricing power in the execution of order 
flow. The Exchange in particular operates a ``Maker-Taker'' model 
whereby it pays credits to members that provide liquidity and assesses 
fees to those that remove liquidity. The Exchange's fee schedule sets 
forth the standard rebates and rates applied per share for orders that 
provide and remove liquidity, respectively. Currently, for orders 
priced at or above $1.00, the Exchange provides a standard rebate of 
$0.00160 per share for orders that add liquidity and assesses a fee of 
$0.00270 per share for orders that remove liquidity. For orders priced 
below $1.00, the Exchange a standard rebate of $0.00009 per share for 
orders that add liquidity and assesses a fee of 0.30% of Dollar Value 
for orders that remove liquidity. Additionally, in response to the 
competitive environment, the Exchange also offers tiered pricing which 
provides Members opportunities to qualify for higher rebates or reduced 
fees where certain volume criteria and thresholds are met. Tiered 
pricing provides an incremental incentive for Members to strive for 
higher tier levels, which provides increasingly higher benefits or 
discounts for satisfying increasingly more stringent criteria.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market Volume 
Summary, Month-to-Date (October 28, 2020), available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_statistics/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Elimination of Volume Tiers
    Pursuant to footnote 1 of the Fees Schedule, the Exchange currently 
offers Add Volume Tiers (tiers 1 through 4, plus six various additional 
tiers) that provide Members an opportunity to receive an enhanced 
rebate from the standard fee assessment for liquidity adding orders 
that yield fee codes ``B'',\4\ ``V'',\5\ ``Y'',\6\ ``3'',\7\ and 
``4''.\8\ The Add Volume Tiers currently offer ten different tiers that 
vary in levels of criteria difficulty and incentive opportunities in 
which Members may qualify for enhanced rebates for such orders. The 
Exchange proposes to eliminate three of those tiers. First, the 
Exchange proposes to eliminate Growth Tier 1 (and renumber Growth Tiers 
2 and 3 accordingly), which provides a $0.0020 per share rebate for 
Members that (1) add an ADV \9\ of greater than or equal to 0.10% of 
the TCV \10\ or (2) have a Step-Up Add TCV from March 2019 greater than 
or equal to 0.05%. The Exchange also proposes to eliminate its Cross-
Asset Volume Tiers. Particularly, Cross-Asset Volume Tier 1 provides a 
$0.0027 per share rebate for Members that (1) add an ADV greater than 
or equal to 0.20% of the TCV and (2) have an ADV in Customer orders on 
EDGX Options greater than or equal to 0.08% of average OCV.\11\ Cross-
Asset Volume Tier 2 similarly provides a $0.0027 per share rebate for 
Members that (1) add an ADV greater than or equal to 0.05% of the TCV 
and (2) have an ADV in AIM orders on EDGX Options greater than or equal 
to 25,000 contracts. The Exchange also proposes to eliminate Tape B 
Volume Tier, which is currently described under footnote 2 of the fees 
schedule (the Exchange also proposes to remove footnote 2 from the 
applicable Fees Code Table). Particularly, Tape B Volume Tier consists 
of one tier which applies to orders yielding fee code B and 4 and 
provides a $0.0027 per share rebate to Members that add an ADV greater 
than or equal to 0.10% of the TCV in Tape B securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Appended to orders that add liquidity to EDGX (Tape B) and 
offered a rebate of $0.00160 per share.
    \5\ Appended to orders that add liquidity to EDGX (Tape A) and 
offered a rebate of $0.00160 per share.
    \6\ Appended to orders that add liquidity to EDGX (Tape C) and 
offered a rebate of $0.00160 per share.
    \7\ Appended to orders that add liquidity to EDGX pre and post 
market (Tape A or C) and offered a rebate of $0.00160 per share.
    \8\ Appended to orders that add liquidity to EDGX pre and post 
market (Tape B) and offered a rebate of $0.00160 per share.
    \9\ ``ADV'' means average daily volume calculated as the number 
of shares added to, removed from, or routed by, the Exchange, or any 
combination or subset thereof, per day. ADV is calculated on a 
monthly basis.
    \10\ ``TCV'' means total consolidated volume calculated as the 
volume reported by all exchanges and trade reporting facilities to a 
consolidated transaction reporting plan for the month for which the 
fees apply.
    \11\ ``OCV'' means for purposes of equities pricing, the total 
equity and ETF options volume that clears in the Customer range at 
the Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') for the month for which 
the fees apply, excluding volume on any day that the Exchange 
experiences an Exchange System Disruption and on any day with a 
scheduled early market close, using the definition of Customer as 
provided under the Exchange's fee schedule for EDGX Options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Exchange proposes to eliminate Cross-Asset Tier 
1 as no Member has reached this tier in several months and the Exchange 
therefore no longer wishes to, nor is it required to, maintain such 
tier. The Exchange proposes to eliminate Growth Tier 1, Cross-Asset 
Tier 2 and Tape B Volume Tier as it no longer wishes to, nor is it 
required to, maintain such tiers. More specifically, the proposed rule 
change removes these tiers as the Exchange would rather redirect 
resources and funding into other programs and tiers intended to 
incentivize increased order flow.
Proposed Updates to the Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers
    Currently, the Exchange provides for three Non-Displayed Add Volume 
Tiers under footnote 1 of the Fee Schedule. These tiers offer enhanced 
rebates on Members' orders yielding fee codes ``DM'',\12\ ``HA'',\13\ 
``MM'' \14\ and ``RP'' \15\ where a Member reaches certain required 
volume-based criteria offered in each tier. Specifically, the Non-
Displayed Add Volume Tiers are as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Appended to orders that add liquidity using MidPoint 
Discretionary order within discretionary range and are provided a 
rebate of $0.00100.
    \13\ Appended to non-displayed orders that add liquidity and are 
provided a rebate of $0.00100.
    \14\ Appended to non-displayed orders that add liquidity using 
Mid-Point Peg and are provided a rebate of $0.00100.
    \15\ Appended to non-displayed orders that add liquidity using 
Supplemental Peg and are provided a rebate of $0.00100.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Tier 1 provides an enhanced rebate of $0.0015 for a 
Member's qualifying orders (i.e., yielding fee codes DM, HA, MM and RP) 
where a Member adds an ADAV \16\ greater than or equal to 0.01% of TCV 
for Non-Displayed orders that yield fee codes DM, HA, HI, MM or RP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ ``ADAV'' means average daily added volume calculated as the 
number of shares added per day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Tier 2 provides an enhanced rebate of $0.0022 for a 
Member's qualifying

[[Page 74479]]

orders where a Member adds an ADAV greater than or equal to 0.02% of 
TCV for Non-Displayed orders that yield fee codes DM, HA, HI, MM or RP.
     Tier 3 provides an enhanced rebate of $0.0025 for a 
Member's qualifying orders where a Member has an ADAV greater than or 
equal to 0.05% of TCV for Non-Displayed orders that yield fee codes DM, 
HA, HI, MM or RP.
    The Exchange proposes to update the criteria in Non-Displayed Add 
Volume Tiers 2 and 3 as follows below. The Exchange notes that the 
enhanced rebates currently provided in each tier remain the same.
     To meet the proposed criteria in Tier 1 [sic], a Member 
must have an ADAV greater than or equal to 0.05% (instead of 0.02%) of 
TCV for Non-Displayed orders that yield fee codes DM, HA, HI, MM or RP.
     To meet the proposed criteria in Tier 3, a Member must 
have an ADAV greater than or equal to 0.10% (instead of 0.05%) of TCV 
for Non-Displayed orders that yield fee codes DM, HA, HI, MM or RP.
    The Exchange notes Non-Displayed Add Volumes Tiers 2 and 3, as 
modified, continue to be available to all Members and provide Members 
an opportunity to receive an enhanced rebate, albeit using more 
stringent criteria. Moreover, the proposed changes are designed to 
encourage Members to increase non-displayed liquidity on the Exchange, 
which further contributes to a deeper, more liquid market and provides 
even more execution opportunities for active market participants at 
improved prices.
Retail Volume Tiers
    Pursuant to footnote 3 of the fee schedule, the Exchange currently 
offers Retail Volume Tiers which provide Retail Member Organizations 
(``RMOs'') \17\ an opportunity to receive an enhanced rebate from the 
standard rebate for Retail Orders \18\ that add liquidity (i.e., 
yielding fee code ``ZA'' \19\). Currently, the Retail Volume Tiers 
offer three levels of criteria difficulty and incentive opportunities 
in which RMOs may qualify for enhanced rebates for Retail Orders. The 
tier structures are designed to encourage RMOs to increase their order 
flow in order to receive an enhanced rebate on their liquidity adding 
orders, and the Exchange now proposes to amend existing Retail Volume 
Tiers 1, 2 and 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ A ``Retail Member Organization'' or ``RMO'' is a Member (or 
a division thereof) that has been approved by the Exchange under 
this Rule to submit Retail Orders. See EDGX Rule 11.21(a)(1).
    \18\ A ``Retail Order'' is an agency or riskless principal order 
that meets the criteria of FINRA Rule 5320.03 that originates from a 
natural person and is submitted to the Exchange by a Retail Member 
Organization, provided that no change is made to the terms of the 
order with respect to price or side of market and the order does not 
originate from a trading algorithm or any other computerized 
methodology. See EDGX Rule 11.21(a)(2).
    \19\ Appended to Retail Orders that add liquidity to EDGX and 
offered a rebate of $0.0032 per share.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, the current Retail Volume Tiers are as follows:
     Tier 1 provides an enhanced rebate of $0.0034 for a 
Member's qualifying orders (i.e., yielding fee code ZA) where a Member 
(1) has a Retail Step-Up Add TCV (i.e. yielding fee code ZA) from 
February 2020 greater than or equal to 0.05% and (2) adds a Retail 
Order ADV (i.e., yielding fee code ZA) greater than or equal to 0.20% 
of the TCV.
     Tier 2 provides an enhanced rebate of $0.0037 for a 
Member's qualifying orders (i.e., yielding fee code ZA) where a Member 
has a Retail Step-Up Add TCV (i.e. yielding fee code ZA) from May 2020 
greater than or equal to 0.10%.
     Tier 3 provides an enhanced rebate of $0.0038 for a 
Member's qualifying orders (i.e., yielding fee code ZA) where a Member 
adds a Retail Order ADV (i.e. yielding fee code ZA) greater than or 
equal to 0.50%.
    The Exchange proposes to update the criteria in Retail Volume Tiers 
1, 2 and 3 as follows below.
     To meet the proposed criteria in Tier 1, a Member must add 
a Retail Order ADV (i.e. yielding fee code ZA) greater than or equal to 
0.35% (instead of 0.20%) of the TCV. The Exchange also proposes to 
eliminate the first prong of current Retail Volume Tier 1 (i.e., that a 
Member have a Retail Step-Up Add TCV from February 2020 >=0.05%).
     To meet the proposed criteria in Tier 2, a Member must 
continue to meet the current prong of Retail Volume Tier 2 but also 
meet a new additional prong requiring that a Member remove a Retail 
Order ADV (i.e., yielding fee code ZR) greater than or equal to 0.15% 
of the TCV.
     To meet the proposed criteria in Tier 3, a Member must add 
a Retail Order ADV (i.e. yielding fee code ZA) greater than or equal to 
0.60% (instead of 0.50%). The Exchange also proposes to reduce the 
rebate from $0.0038 to $0.0036 per share.
    The Exchange notes Retail Volume Tiers 1, 2 and 3, as modified, 
continue to be available to all RMOs and provide RMOs an opportunity to 
receive an enhanced rebate, albeit using a more stringent criteria. 
Moreover, the proposed changes are designed to encourage RMOs to 
increase retail order flow on the Exchange encourage Members to 
increase non-displayed liquidity [sic] on the Exchange, which further 
contributes to a deeper, more liquid market and provides even more 
execution opportunities for active market participants at improved 
prices.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,\20\ in general, and 
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4),\21\ in particular, as it is 
designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, 
fees and other charges among its Members, issuers and other persons 
using its facilities. The Exchange operates in a highly competitive 
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to 
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be 
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. The proposed rule changes 
reflect a competitive pricing structure designed to incentivize market 
participants to direct their order flow to the Exchange, which the 
Exchange believes would enhance market quality to the benefit of all 
Members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Exchange believes the proposal to remove the 
Growth Tier 1, Cross-Asset Volume Tier 2 and Tape B Volume Tier is 
reasonable because the Exchange is not required to maintain these tiers 
and Members still have a number of other opportunities and a variety of 
ways to receive enhanced rebates for displayed liquidity adding orders, 
including via the existing add volume tiers and growth tiers. The 
Exchange believes the proposal to eliminate these tiers is also 
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it applies to all 
Members (i.e., the tier won't be available for any Member). The 
Exchange notes that recently one Member was satisfying the criteria of 
Growth Tier 1, one Member was satisfying the criteria of the Tape B 
Volume Tier and two members were satisfying the criteria of Cross-Asset 
Tier 2. The Exchange also notes that the proposed change does not 
preclude any Member, including the Members that were receiving the 
rebates under these tiers, from achieving the remaining add volume 
tiers and growth volume tiers to qualify for the remaining enhanced 
rebates or other available enhances [sic] rebates under other incentive 
tiers.\22\ Additionally, those Members are still entitled to a rebate 
for its displayed

[[Page 74480]]

orders adding liquidity (i.e., the standard rebate), albeit a rebate 
that is lower than the amount under Growth Tier 1, Tape B Volume Tier 
and Cross-Asset Volume Tier 2. The proposed rule change merely results 
in Members not receiving particular enhanced rebates, which as noted 
above, the Exchange is not required to offer or maintain. Additionally, 
as noted above, those Members, along with all other Members, are 
eligible to qualify for the remaining add volume tier rebates should 
they satisfy the respective criteria.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See e.g., Cboe EDGX Equities Fee Schedule, Footnote 1, 
which provides various Add/Remove Volume Tiers applicable to fee 
codes B, V, Y, 3 and 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also believes the proposed amendment to remove the 
Cross-Asset Tier 1 is reasonable because no Member has achieved this 
tier in several months. Furthermore, the Exchange is not required to 
maintain this tier and as discussed, Members still have a number of 
other opportunities and a variety of ways to receive enhanced rebates, 
including the proposed enhanced standard rebates for displayed orders 
adding liquidity. The Exchange believes the proposal to eliminate these 
tiers is also equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it 
applies to all Members.
    The Exchange believes the proposed changes to the Non-Displayed Add 
Volume Tiers 2 and 3 and Retail Volume Tiers 1, 2 and 3 are reasonable 
because each tier, as modified, continues to be available to all 
Members and RMOs, respectively, and provide Members and RMOs, 
respectively, an opportunity to receive an enhanced rebate, albeit 
using more stringent criteria. The Exchange next notes that relative 
volume-based incentives and discounts have been widely adopted by 
exchanges,\23\ including the Exchange,\24\ and are reasonable, 
equitable and non-discriminatory because they are open to all Members 
(and RMOs as applicable) on an equal basis and provide additional 
benefits or discounts that are reasonably related to (i) the value to 
an exchange's market quality and (ii) associated higher levels of 
market activity, such as higher levels of liquidity provision and/or 
growth patterns. Additionally, as noted above, the Exchange operates in 
a highly competitive market. The Exchange is only one of several equity 
venues to which market participants may direct their order flow, and it 
represents a small percentage of the overall market. It is also only 
one of several maker-taker exchanges. Competing equity exchanges offer 
similar tiered pricing structures to that of the Exchange, including 
schedules of rebates and fees that apply based upon members achieving 
certain volume thresholds. These competing pricing schedules, moreover, 
are presently comparable to those that the Exchange provides, including 
the pricing of comparable tiers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See e.g., Nasdaq PSX Price List, Rebate to Add Displayed 
Liquidity (Per Share Executed), which provides rebates to members 
for adding displayed liquidity over certain thresholds of TCV 
ranging between $0.0020 and $0.0026; Cboe BZX U.S. Equities Exchange 
Fee Schedule, Footnote 1, Add Volume Tiers, which provides similar 
incentives for liquidity adding orders and offers rebates ranging 
between $0.0018 and $0.0032; Nasdaq Price List, Rebate to Add 
Displayed Designated Retail Liquidity, which offer rebates of 
$0.00325 and $0.0033 for Add Displayed Designated Retail Liquidity.
    \24\ See generally, Cboe EDGX U.S. Equities Exchange Fee 
Schedule, Footnote 1, Add Volume Tiers, which provides incentives 
for ADV/ADAV order flow as a percentage of TCV and for criteria 
based on certain other threshold components (i.e. Step-Up Add TCV, 
average OCV, and AIM and Customer orders); and Footnote 3, Retail 
Volume Tiers, which provides incentives for Retail Step-Up Add TCV 
and Retail Order ADV as a percentage of TCV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also believes that the current enhanced rebates under 
Non-Displayed Tiers 2 and 3 and Retail Volume Tiers 1 and 2, along with 
the proposed reduced rebate under Retail Volume Tier 3, continue to be 
commensurate with the proposed criteria. That is, the additional 
rebates reasonably reflect the difficulty in achieving the 
corresponding criteria as amended. Also, the Exchange's affiliated 
equities exchange, BZX Equities, currently has Non-Displayed Volume 
Tiers in place, which offer substantially similar enhanced rebates and 
corresponding criteria.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See e.g., Cboe BZX Equities Fee Schedule, Footnote 1, which 
provides various Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Overall, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes to the 
Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers, each based on a Member's liquidity 
adding orders, will benefit all market participants by incentivizing 
continuous liquidity and, thus, deeper more liquid markets as well as 
increased execution opportunities. Particularly, the proposed changes 
to the Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers are designed to incentivize non-
displayed liquidity, which further contributes to a deeper, more liquid 
market and provide even more execution opportunities for active market 
participants at improved prices. This overall increase in activity 
deepens the Exchange's liquidity pool, offers additional cost savings, 
supports the quality of price discovery, promotes market transparency 
and improves market quality, for all investors.
    The Exchange also believes that the proposal represents an 
equitable allocation of fees and rebates and is not unfairly 
discriminatory because all Members are eligible for Non-Displayed Add 
Volume Tiers and would have the opportunity to meet the tiers' criteria 
and would receive the proposed fee if such criteria is met. Without 
having a view of activity on other markets and off-exchange venues, the 
Exchange has no way of knowing whether this proposed rule change would 
definitely result in any Members qualifying for the proposed tiers. The 
Exchange notes that most recently, three members satisfied Non-
Displayed Tier 2 and five Members satisfied Non-Displayed Tier 3. While 
the Exchange has no way of predicting with certainty how the proposed 
tier will impact Member activity, the Exchange anticipates that 
approximately four Members will be able to satisfy Non-Displayed Tier 2 
(as amended) and one Member will be able to satisfy Non-Displayed Tier 
3 (as amended). The Exchange also notes that proposed tiers will not 
adversely impact any Member's ability to qualify for other reduced fee 
or enhanced rebate tiers. Should a Member not meet the proposed 
criteria under any of the proposed tiers, the Member will merely not 
receive that corresponding reduced fee.
    The Exchange believes that the proposal relating to the Retail 
Volume Tiers also represents an equitable allocation of rebates and is 
not unfairly discriminatory because all RMOs will continue to be 
eligible for each Retail Volume Tier. The proposed changes are designed 
as an incentive to any and all RMOs interested in meeting the tier 
criteria, as amended to submit additional adding and/or removing, or 
Retail, order flow to the Exchange. The Exchange notes that greater add 
volume order flow provides for deeper, more liquid markets and 
execution opportunities, and greater remove volume order flow increases 
transactions on the Exchange, which incentivizes liquidity providers to 
submit additional liquidity and execution opportunities, thus, 
providing an overall increase in price discovery and transparency on 
the Exchange. Also, an increase in Retail Order flow, which orders are 
generally submitted in smaller sizes, tends to attract Market-Makers, 
as smaller size orders are easier to hedge. Increased Market-Maker 
activity facilitates tighter spreads, signaling an additional 
corresponding increase in order flow from other market participants, 
which contributes towards a robust, well-balanced market ecosystem. 
Increased overall order flow benefits all investors by deepening the 
Exchange's liquidity pool, potentially providing even greater execution 
incentives and opportunities, offering

[[Page 74481]]

additional flexibility for all investors to enjoy cost savings, 
supporting the quality of price discovery, promoting market 
transparency and improving investor protection. The Exchange also notes 
all RMOs will continue to have the opportunity to submit the requisite 
order flow and will receive the applicable enhanced rebate if the tier 
criteria is met. The Exchange additionally notes that while the Retail 
Volume Tiers are applicable only to RMOs, the Exchange does not believe 
this application is discriminatory as the Exchange offers similar 
rebates to non-RMO order flow.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ Such as the other Add/Remove Volume Tiers under Footnote 1 
of the EDGX Fees Schedule which provide opportunities to all Members 
to submit the requisite order flow to receive an enhanced rebate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Without having a view of activity on other markets and off-exchange 
venues, the Exchange has no way of knowing whether this proposed rule 
change would definitely result in any RMOs qualifying for the proposed 
amended tier. The Exchange notes that most recently, two Members 
satisfied Retail Volume Tier 1, one Member satisfied Retail Volume Tier 
2 and two Members satisfied Retail Volume Tier 3. While the Exchange 
has no way of predicting with certainty how the proposed tier will 
impact Member activity, the Exchange anticipates that approximately one 
Member will be able to satisfy Retail Volume Tier 1 (as amended), one 
Member will be able to satisfy Retail Volume Tier 2 (as amended) and 
one Member will be able to satisfy Retail Volume Tier 3 (as amended). 
The Exchange also notes that the proposed amended tiers will not 
adversely impact any RMO's ability to qualify for other rebate tiers. 
Rather, should a RMO not meet the criteria for Retail Volume Tier 1, 2 
or 3 as amended, the RMO will merely not receive the corresponding 
proposed enhanced rebate. Furthermore, the proposed rebate would 
uniformly apply to all RMOs that meet the required criteria

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Rather, as discussed above, the 
Exchange believes that the proposed change would encourage the 
submission of additional order flow to a public exchange, thereby 
promoting market depth, execution incentives and enhanced execution 
opportunities, as well as price discovery and transparency for all 
Members. As a result, the Exchange believes that the proposed change 
furthers the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation NMS of fostering 
competition among orders, which promotes ``more efficient pricing of 
individual stocks for all types of orders, large and small.''
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change does not impose any 
burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Particularly, the proposed 
changes to the Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers applies to all Members 
equally in that all Members are eligible for these tiers, have a 
reasonable opportunity to meet the tiers' criteria and will receive the 
enhanced rebates if such criteria is met. Similarly, the proposed 
changes to the Retail Volume Tiers apply to all RMOs equally in that 
all RMOs are eligible for those tiers, have a reasonable opportunity to 
meet the tiers' criteria and will receive the enhanced rebates if such 
criteria are met. Additionally, the proposed tiers are designed to 
attract additional order flow to the Exchange. The Exchange believes 
that the updated tier criteria would incentivize market participants to 
direct liquidity adding and/or removing order flow to the Exchange, 
bringing with it additional execution opportunities for market 
participants and improved price transparency. Greater overall order 
flow, trading opportunities, and pricing transparency benefits all 
market participants on the Exchange by enhancing market quality and 
continuing to encourage Members to send orders, thereby contributing 
towards a robust and well-balanced market ecosystem.
    Next, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change does not 
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As previously 
discussed, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. 
Members have numerous alternative venues that they may participate on 
and direct their order flow, including 15 other equities exchanges and 
off-exchange venues and alternative trading systems. Additionally, the 
Exchange represents a small percentage of the overall market. Based on 
publicly available information, no single equities exchange has more 
than 18% of the market share. Therefore, no exchange possesses 
significant pricing power in the execution of order flow. Indeed, 
participants can readily choose to send their orders to other exchange 
and off-exchange venues if they deem fee levels at those other venues 
to be more favorable. Moreover, the Commission has repeatedly expressed 
its preference for competition over regulatory intervention in 
determining prices, products, and services in the securities markets. 
Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the 
importance of market forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, 
also, recognized that current regulation of the market system ``has 
been remarkably successful in promoting market competition in its 
broader forms that are most important to investors and listed 
companies.'' The fact that this market is competitive has also long 
been recognized by the courts. In NetCoalition v. Securities and 
Exchange Commission, the DC Circuit stated as follows: ``[n]o one 
disputes that competition for order flow is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC 
explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market system, buyers and sellers of 
securities, and the broker-dealers that act as their order-routing 
agents, have a wide range of choices of where to route orders for 
execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to take its market share 
percentages for granted' because `no exchange possesses a monopoly, 
regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of order flow from broker 
dealers'. . .''. Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe its 
proposed fee change imposes any burden on competition that is not 
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \27\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \28\ 
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed 
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule

[[Page 74482]]

change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \28\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2020-053 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2020-053. 
This file number should be included on the subject line if email is 
used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more 
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all 
comments on the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, 
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that 
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating 
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, 
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance 
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website 
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F 
Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the 
hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be 
available for inspection and copying at the principal offices of the 
Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons 
submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit 
personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR- CboeEDGX-2020-053, and 
should be submitted on or before December 11, 2020.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-25615 Filed 11-19-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P