Document ID: FERC-2007-2073-0001
Agency: ferc
Document Type: Notice
Title: Proposed Information Collection and Request for Comments
Posted Date: 2007-12-14T05:00Z

[Federal Register: December 14, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 240)]
[Notices]               
[Page 71130-71132]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr14de07-37]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IC08-725C-000]

 
Proposed Information Collection and Request for Comments

December 7, 2007.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Request for Office of Management and Budget Emergency 
Processing of proposed information collection and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is 
providing notice of its request to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for emergency processing of a proposed collection of information 
in connection with steps being taken by the electric industry to 
address potential cyber vulnerabilities, and is soliciting public 
comment on that information collection.

DATES: The Commission and OMB must receive comments on or before 
January 14, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to:
    (1) Nathan Frey, FERC Desk Officer, Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. Mr. Frey may be 
reached by telephone at (202) 395-7345.
    (2) Michael Miller, Office of the Executive Director, ED-30, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426. Mr. Miller may be reached by telephone at (202) 502-8415 and 
by e-mail at michael.miller@ferc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan First, Office of the General 
Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. Mr. First may be reached by telephone at (202) 
502-8529 and by e-mail at jonathan.first@ferc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A recent experiment conducted for the 
Department of Homeland Security by the Idaho National Laboratory 
demonstrated that under certain conditions energy infrastructure could 
be intentionally damaged through cyber attack. In that experiment, 
researchers caused a generator to malfunction through an experimental 
cyber attack. This potential cyber vulnerability, which was recently 
broadcast on CNN, was the subject of an October 17, 2007 hearing before 
the Homeland Security Subcommittee on Emerging Threats, Cybersecurity, 
and Science and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives.
    The Commission intends to immediately issue a directive that 
requires all generator owners, generator operators, transmission 
owners, and transmission operators that are registered by the North 
American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) and located in the 
United States to provide to NERC certain information related to actions 
they have taken or intend to take to protect against the potential 
cyber vulnerability discussed above. The Commission will also require 
NERC to make this information available for Commission review.

[[Page 71131]]

    Section 215 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824o, vests the 
Commission with authority over the Electric Reliability Organization 
(ERO) and over the users, owners and operators of the Bulk-Power System 
for purposes of approving and enforcing mandatory Reliability 
Standards. Under section 215, the term ``Reliability Standard'' 
includes requirements for the cyber security protection of the Bulk-
Power System. Moreover, the Commission is charged not merely with 
approving (or remanding) Reliability Standards filed by the ERO, but 
also with ordering the ERO to submit a proposed standard or a 
modification to an existing standard that ``addresses a specific matter 
if the Commission considers such a new or modified reliability standard 
appropriate to carry out this section.''
    A number of efforts are underway to secure the Nation's electric 
infrastructure against potential cyber vulnerabilities. One such effort 
is an advisory issued by NERC, acting through the Electric Sector-
Information Sharing and Analysis Center (ES-ISAC), to generator owners, 
generator operators, transmission owners, and transmission operators. 
This advisory identified a number of short-term measures, mid-term 
measures and long-term measures designed to mitigate the potential 
cyber vulnerability discussed above.
    It has been represented that a number of entities are already 
either secured against the potential cyber vulnerability referred to 
above or have taken steps to mitigate this vulnerability, and NERC has 
since sent a data request to industry members. That data request is 
limited in scope. It is essentially a request that industry members 
indicate if their mitigation plans are ``complete,'' ``in progress,'' 
or ``not performing.'' This information is not sufficient for the 
Commission to discharge its duties under section 215 of the Federal 
Power Act because it does not provide information on what facilities 
are the subject of the mitigation plans, what steps to mitigate the 
potential cyber vulnerability are being taken, when those steps are 
planned to be taken, and, if certain actions are not being taken, why 
not.
    In sum, given the seriousness of this potential vulnerability and 
given that the NERC data request does not provide information that the 
Commission needs to discharge its statutory responsibilities, the 
Commission believes further action is necessary in order to ensure that 
the owners and operators of the Bulk-Power System have taken or are 
taking appropriate steps to protect the Bulk-Power System.
    Section 307 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 825f, authorizes 
the Commission to ``investigate any facts, conditions, practices, or 
matters which it may find necessary or proper * * * to aid in * * * 
prescribing rules or regulations [under the Federal Power Act], or in 
obtaining information to serve as a basis for recommending further 
legislation.'' Section 39.2(d) of the Commission's regulations, 18 CFR 
39.2(d), requires owners and operators to ``provide the Commission * * 
* such information as is necessary to implement section 215 of the 
Federal Power Act as determined by the Commission.''
    The Commission believes that the information that will be requested 
is critical to ensuring that appropriate mitigation of this potential 
cyber vulnerability is put in place and that it is put in place as 
quickly as possible. The Commission believes that an accurate overview 
of the actions taken and expected to be taken in the industry is a 
necessary first step to determine whether any further measures need to 
be taken by the Commission to ensure the safety and reliability of the 
Bulk-Power System. The Commission is very sensitive to the need to 
preserve confidentiality of the information requested and the need to 
minimize the burden on industry. Accordingly, the information will be 
examined on-site at NERC headquarters, and disclosure by NERC will be 
on a need-to-know basis to NERC personnel and the Commission and its 
staff.
    Respondents will provide the information listed below to NERC, 
which will secure the information and treat the responses as nonpublic 
information available, as noted above, on a need-to-know basis to NERC 
personnel and to the Commission and its staff. Following Commission 
review, the information will be returned to the submitters.
    Each respondent will be required to provide the following 
information to NERC:
    1. A copy of the owner or operator's plan for responding to the 
cyber vulnerability outlined in the ES-ISAC advisory, along with a 
general description of the facility for each plan,
    2. A description of the measures--short-term, mid-term, and long-
term--taken or planned to be taken (and the timeframe for implementing 
such measures) as recommended by the ES-ISAC advisory to mitigate the 
risks associated with this cyber vulnerability including projected 
completion dates if they fall outside the ES-ISAC advisory deadlines,
    3. An explanation of how the plan and measures described above 
secure the owners or operators' facilities against this cyber 
vulnerability, and
    4. If an owner or operator believes no actions are necessary 
regarding a measure, an explanation why it believes that to be so, 
along with a general description of the facility that the respondent 
proposes to exempt from actions under the advisory.
    The Commission estimates that it would take each respondent no more 
than 12 hours to generate the requested information. The Commission 
estimates that the number of respondents will be approximately 1,150. 
Therefore, the total number of hours it would take to comply with the 
reporting requirement would be 13,800. The Commission estimates a total 
professional and clerical staff, as well as direct and indirect 
overhead costs.
    The Commission has submitted this reporting requirement to OMB for 
approval. OMB's regulations describe the process that federal agencies 
must follow in order to obtain OMB approval of reporting requirement. 
See 5 CFR part 1320. The standards for emergency processing of 
information collections appear at 5 CFR 1320.13. If OMB approves a 
reporting requirement, then it will assign an information collection 
control number to that requirement. If a request for information 
subject to OMB review has not been given a valid control number, then 
the recipient is not required to respond.
    OMB requires federal agencies seeking approval of reporting 
requirements to allow the public an opportunity to comment on the 
proposed reporting requirement. 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv). Therefore, the 
Commission is soliciting comment on:
    (1) Whether the collection of the information is necessary for the 
proper performance of the Commission's functions, including whether the 
information will have practical utility;
    (2) The accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the burden of the 
collection of this information, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used;
    (3) The quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and
    (4) How to minimize the burden of the collection of this 
information on respondents, including the use of appropriate automated 
electronic,

[[Page 71132]]

mechanical, or other forms of information technology.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-24249 Filed 12-13-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P