Document ID: EPA-HQ-OECA-2009-0274-0114
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2013-07-30T04:00Z

Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance

Electronic Rule

Analysis B:
General Permit Reports

         August 2010
                                         
                                        By
                               Shane A. Knipschild
1. What is eNOI?
      
      The electronic Notice of Intent system (eNOI) is an online system that allows facilities to submit the following general permit reports, which are required under current EPA regulations  (40 CFR 122.28 and 124.5):
      
         * Notice of Intent to discharge (NOI); 
         * Notice of Termination (NOT); 
         * No Exposure Certifications (NECs); 
         * Low Erosivity Waivers (LEWs)]
      
      The eNOI system includes an e-Reporting system that enables industrial permittees to submit quarterly Discharge Monitoring Reports, Annual Reports, and Non-Compliance Reports as required in the EPA 2008 MSGP permit. As of June 2009, the eNOI system is used to submit NOIs under the EPA's NPDES Vessel General Permit (VGP).
      
2. What does the eNOI tool do?
      
      The eNOI system allows Owner Operators to apply for coverage under the MSGP, CGP, and VGP programs. Users can also submit NOTs, LEWs, and NECs under the CGP and MSGP. Once Owner Operators obtain coverage, users can also terminate and modify coverage. An acknowledgement letter and PDF of the NOI is generated in the eNOI system and also emailed to the Certifying Official for documentation. The eNOI system also allows users to submit a variety of reports as required under the MSGP.
      
3. How does the eNOI system lead to cost savings?
      
      The primary cost saving occurs because an eNOI system reduces the number of hard-copy submittals and manual data entry into the NOI database. eNOI also fulfills the following: is an inexpensive form of public notice; notifies permittees immediately if incorrect data is entered; provides an efficient means of recordkeeping and receipt notification for EPA and permittees; and allows the public to easily search the database for NOIs and will reduce EPA time spent responding to public requests about NOI data via web-based interfaces. Approximately 15% of NOIs are still submitted in hard-copy, accepted and processed by the NOI processing center.

4.	Should eNOI be implemented as a tool attached to ICIS, or as a standalone system?
      
      eNOI should be implemented as a tool attached to ICIS.  Currently EPA's eNOI tool is managed by the Office of Water (OW).  75% of the federal data is entered into the eNOI system.  Planned eNOI expansion by OW will include Pesticides, CAFOs, Construction General Permits (CGPs) and vessels. Consistency across the eNOI reporting system would enable the data to be implemented into other systems. Regardless of how eNOI is integrated with ICIS and NetDMR, OWM plans to add the following sets of coverage to eNOI:
      
                  *             Vessel Reporting for small cruise ships: Annual Reports and Non-Compliance Reports within the next 6 months; One Time Reports within the next 12 months
                  *             EPA Pesticides Permit: issue date April 2011
                  *             CGP issue date June 2011, which will include an effluent guideline in the permit and hence will require a reporting function in eNOI
                  *             CAFO: registration form for medium CAFOs, issue date Fall 2011.
5.	What are the key steps that will need to be taken to facilitate permitee adoption of the selected eNOI tool?
      
      Currently 75% of the eNOI data is being reported electronically.  Permitees have already adopted the eNOI tool.  Steps to incorporate the 25% data that is entered via a clearinghouse would have to be implemented.  The Electronic Reporting Rule would transition the permitees who currently submit paper copies to report their data electronically. In the full integration option, all eNOI functionality would be incorporated within ICIS and NetDMR, and eNOI would no longer exist as a separate system.  All data would be consolidated within ICIS, and a new module supporting NOI program requirements and management tools for OWM would be built.  NetDMR would have new modules added so it could be the interface with which permittees submitted NOIs, DMRs, and any other NOI-related reporting data. 
       
In order for eNOI to be subsumed within ICIS and NetDMR, the following high-level steps would need to be performed:
oo MSGP, covered facility, Permitted Feature, Limit Set, Limit, DMR, and reporting data will be loaded into ICIS; some of this data entry may occur as a data migration from eNOI, and a significant percentage may require manual entry
oo ICIS will be enhanced to add screens to allow management of the NOI program and to update existing functionality to include NOI data elements as needed
oo NetDMR will be enhanced to add modules to allow electronic submittal of NOIs, NOI-related DMRs, and reporting data
oo The ICIS/NetDMR data flows will be enhanced to add flows that support the new NOI data streams 
oo ICIS reporting will be enhanced to support NOI program standard and ad hoc reporting needs
This solution would leverage the existing ICIS/NetDMR infrastructure, security, and technology environment.  The use of the NetDMR framework will allow for state installations of eNOI for their own systems and will provide the means for data sharing via web services and XML schemas.
Figure 5-1, eNOI Full Integration Solution depicts the envisioned solution.
Figure 5-1: eNOI Full Integration Solution

In the partial integration option, eNOI would continue to be maintained as a separate system which would flow data to ICIS and NetDMR.  In this scenario, ICIS would be updated to contain the new NOI data, but would not have a new NOI management module built.  All the data would reside in ICIS, and the data would also reside in eNOI.  
In order to create the data flows between eNOI and NetDMR and ICIS, the following high-level steps would need to be performed:
oo MSGP, covered facility, Permitted Feature, Limit Set, Limit, DMR, and reporting data will be loaded into ICIS; some of this data entry may occur as a data migration from eNOI, and a significant percentage may require manual entry
oo ICIS will be enhanced to update existing functionality to include NOI data elements as needed
oo NetDMR will be enhanced to receive DMR data from eNOI, OR eNOI will send DMR data directly to ICIS
oo Data flows will be created that flow NOI, DMR, and reporting data from eNOI to ICIS and/or NetDMR and/or state systems.
This solution would require a new infrastructure for flowing data between eNOI and other applications. It would also require eNOI to complete its CROMERR compliance upgrades and would make sharing the installation code with states more difficult.
Figure 5-2, eNOI Partial Integration Solution depicts the envisioned solution.
Figure 5-2: eNOI Partial Integration Solution

6.	Is the existing eNOI tool sufficiently capable to meet state needs?  If not, can NetDMR be reasonably modified to include the additional state needs (e.g., daily monitoring information, biosolids monitoring, or attachment of additional reports)?
      
      The current ENOI system would have to be modified to meet state NOI needs.  The eNOI system is designed for federally issued general permits. The current eNOI system does not contain specific DMR information.  The information resides in the permit and the permitees request coverage under the eNOI system.  Specific DMR information like limits, limit sets, parameters and values would have to be entered in ICIS in order to use the EDMR system. Daily monitoring is not available in either the eNOI system or ICIS NetDMR.  The systems would have to be modified to accept this type of data.  In the eNOI system reports are saved as PDFs.  Data in these reports would have to be extracted and entered into ICIS.  ICIS is not specifically designed to accept PDF and can not evaluate a PDF document against reporting requirements.

   7. For states with existing eNOI systems, what requirements will need to be established to make the information obtained through those systems compatible with the national data base?
      
      States with existing eNOI systems would have to design and map their systems to EPAs data standards.  In addition, ICIS system required and program required data elements would have to be identified and then mapped or created using the state eNOI system data.

   8. For states with an existing eNOI system, how will its data be submitted to EPA?  
      
      Data from the state eNOI systems could be submitted using the Net DMR principles.  Currently Net DMR uses XML scripts and CDX validation to batch data into ICIS. A direct system to system script could also be generated and implemented.

   9. For states with existing NPDES data systems, but without eNOI systems, how will the states' receive information from EPA after permitees submitted it using the national eNOI tool?
      
      ICIS is capable of generating a file from the reporting tool (Business Objects). That can be used to transfer data from the national system back to the states.  A validation process would have to be developed to remove duplicate data. Also a script could be created to extract the required state data from ICIS and other requirements of state systems.   .

   10. Should the regulated universe for this requirement include all permittees covered by all master general permits?  If so, how should the national tool be adapted?
      
      Some states currently use the national system for eNOI data.  The national system would have to be modified to allow state system entered data and or permitee entered data, or transferred to the national system.
   
   11. Should requirements for some of these master general permits be phased in later?   If so, which ones and when?  
      
 The requirements for specific programmatic interests should follow the rule implementation.

   12. Will all of the required basic-facility and basic-permit data elements be obtained through use of the eNOI tool?   If not, what are the alternative sources?

      No.  Not all of the basic permit data is available in the eNOI system. Permit system and programmatic data like limits, limit sets and values would have to be entered in the national system based on the permits.  Facility data can be extracted and loaded into the national system via the batch process when the national system batch process is completed for facility data.

   13. How will EPA ensure that place holder information from the master general permits (including limit information) will be in ICIS-NPDES prior to need to enter other information related to the facilities covered by the master general permits?

      A formal plan will have to be developed following the phase in process of the rule.  Dates established for the rulemaking phase in options can be used as milestones for ICIS module development. The following is an example plan for implementing eNOI.
      
      
      
Technical:
      
   1.    Identifying existing EPA and/or state tools/experience:
         
         a.       EPA and the states have experience developing and implementing an eNOI system.  EPA's Office of Water has developed and is currently using an eNOI system, nationally.  Alaska and Arizona have developed stat eNOI systems.  Also the national system is utilized by some stated for managing general permit data.
      
         b.       The challenges and risks associated with the full implementation solution are relatively minor.  As stated previously, the general concept, solution framework, security, and procedures have been vetted via the existing NetDMR solution.  Standard technology project challenges and risks will apply.

      For the partial implementation solution, additional challenges and risks will be accrued in the following areas:
            
            *          Making eNOI CROMERR-compliant
            *          Creating new data flows between eNOI and ICIS and/or NetDMR
            *          Determining integration of security requirements between eNOI and ICIS/NetDMR.
          
   1.    Mapping of information collected from tool to data element list to identify what is captured by e-reporting tool (number of data elements, data gaps, etc.)
     
     Direct mapping has not been accomplished but estimates for the eNOI mapping are around 90% with exception to the DMR data as related to OW's eNOI system. This could also depend on the modifications of the ICIS system to accommodate non - mapped data elements.
   
   2.    Size of the reporting universe using e-reporting tool

      Currently the eNOI universe is expanding in the OW system.  This is due to the programmatic inclusion of Pesticides, CGP and CAFOs. 2009 estimates for eNOI data is approximately 100,000 NOIs in the system.  The construction general permit universe is estimated at several hundred thousand sites and over a hundred thousand sites for industrial facilities.  
   
   3.    Reporting of information based on existing regulations:
         
      The MSGP NOI consists of seven major data components: 1) Facility Operator Information (name, EIN number, mailing address) 2) Facility Information (name, previous permit coverage, address, lat/long, area of coverage, federal facility or Indian lands) 3) Discharge Information (if discharge to an MS4, list of receiving waters, impaired waters, TMDLs, pollutants causing impairment, water quality standards, Federal Effluent Limitation Guidelines and Sector/Subsector requirements) 4) Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Contact Information (contact name and phone number) 5) Endangered Species Protection (criterion listing and documentation) 6) Historic Preservation (criterion listing) and 7) Certifier and Preparer information (name, title, electronic signature, email). 
      
      The CGP NOI consists of six data components: 1) Operator Information (name, EIN, mailing address) 2) Project Information (name, address, lat/long, method of mapping, project in Indian County, estimated project start and end date, estimated area disturbed) 3) SWPPP Information (SWPPP prepared in advance to NOI, location to view SWPPP, SWPPP contact) 4) Discharge Information (names of waterbodies and TMDLs) 5) Endangered Species Protection (criterion listing, tracking number) 6) Certification Information (name, title, electronic signature). 
      
      The VGP NOI consists of five major data components: 1) Facility Operator Information (name, EIN, mailing address) 2) Vessel Information (name, IMO, call sign, flag state, type, dimensions, ballast water capacity, year built, date last and next anticipated dry-dock, onboard treatment system, treatment system type and capacity, ballast water data, type of anti-fouling hull coating, prior coverage) 3) Vessel Voyage Information (home port, US ports visiting, number passengers, travel beyond EEZ, engaged in Pacific Nearshore Voyages) 4) Discharge Information (list discharges, engage in industrial operations, experimental ballast water treatment system) 5) Certifier and Preparer Information (name, title, electronic signature, email). 
      
      The MSGP DMR consists of five data components: 1) Facility Information (name, mailing address) 2) Discharge Information (monitoring periods, monitor for cadmium, copper, lead, zinc, chromium, nickel, silver, hardness level) 3) Outfall Information (total outfalls identified in SWPPP, outfall name and list of substantially identical outfalls) 4) Monitoring Information (nature of discharge, duration of event, rainfall amount, time since previous storm event, list table of outfall name, monitoring type, parameter, concentration, units, results descriptions, collection date, exceedance, no further pollutant reduction achievable, comments or explanation of any violation) 5) Certifier and Preparer Information (name, title, electronic signature, email)
      
      General Permits: EPA and authorized states, tribes, and territories issue general permits to cover multiple similar facilities under a single permit. Where a large number of similar facilities require permits, a general permit allows the permitting authority to allocate resources in a more efficient manner and provide more timely permit coverage than would occur if individual permits had to be issued to each similar facility. States, tribes, and territories must seek EPA approval to administer general permits.[1] EPA's regulations governing the General Permit Program are located at 40 CFR 122.28. EPA and authorized programs have issued over 700 general permits nationwide. General permits typically share common elements:[2]
      
   * Sources that involve the same or substantially similar types of operations;
   * Sources that discharge the same types of wastes or engage in the same types of sludge use or disposal;
   * Sources that require the same effluent limitations or operating conditions, or standards for sewage sludge use or disposal; or
   * Sources that require the same monitoring where tiered conditions may be used for minor differences within a class (e.g., size or seasonal activity).
   
The regulations at 40 CFR 122.28(a)(1) provide for general permits to cover dischargers within an area corresponding to specific geographic or political boundaries such as the following:

         * Designated planning area;
         * Sewer district; and
         * City, county, or state boundary.
      
      The process for developing and issuing NPDES general permits is similar to the process for individual permits; however, there are some differences in the sequence of events. For general permits, the permitting authority first identifies the need for a general permit and collects data that demonstrate that a group or category of dischargers has similarities that warrant a general permit. In deciding whether to develop a general permit, permitting authorities consider whether:
      
         * A large number of facilities will be covered;
         * The facilities have similar production processes or activities;
         * The facilities generate similar pollutants; and
         * Whether uniform water quality-based effluent limits (WQBELs) (where necessary) will appropriately implement water quality standards.
      
      The remaining steps of the general permit process are the same as for individual permits. The permitting authority develops a draft permit that includes effluent limitations (if applicable), monitoring conditions, special conditions, and standard conditions. The permitting authority then issues a public notice and addresses public comments, coordinates with EPA as appropriate in the review process, completes a CWA section 401 certification process, develops the administrative record, and issues the final permit. The final permit will also establish the requirements for the specific information that must be submitted by a facility that wishes to be covered under the general permit. After the final general permit has been issued, there are several general permit reports that facilities must submit to their permitting authority, including:
      
         * Notice of Intent (NOI) to discharge: This is the initial submission seeking coverage under a general permit [40 CFR 122.28(b)(2)(i) and (ii)]; 
         * Notice of Termination (NOT): A request by the permittee to terminate their coverage under an existing permit (40 CFR 124.5);
         * No Exposure Certification (NEC): A certification from a facility indicating that coverage under an existing stormwater general permit is not necessary due to certain facility-specific conditions [40 CFR 122.26(g)(1) and (4)]; and
         * Low Erosivity Waiver (LEW): A certification from a facility indicating that coverage under an existing construction stormwater general permit is not necessary due to certain facility-specific or climate conditions [40 CFR 122.26(b)(15)].
      It is important to note that EPA general permit regulations (40 CFR 122.28) do not require all general permit covered facilities to submit NOIs for all general permits issued by EPA and authorized state NPDES programs. Some general permits provide for automatic coverage. This means that neither EPA nor the authorized state, tribe, or territory programs will have information regarding exactly which facilities are regulated under these general permits.
      
      General permits cover a wide range of facility types that range from the very large (e.g., offshore oil and gas facilities, seafood processors) to very small discharges. Discharges from facilities covered under general permits include a variety of pollutants, such as total suspended solids, biochemical oxygen demand, oil and grease, bacteria, nutrients, hydrocarbons, metals, and toxics. 
         
         All other general permits submitted via eNOI will include the following facility data elements, shown in Table 14-1:
         
Data Name
Data Description
Basic Facility Information
Facility Type of Ownership
The code/description identifying the type of facility (e.g., state government, municipal or water district, Federal facility, tribal facility).  This data element is used by the EPA data system to populate the Permit Facility Type data element (i.e., POTW, Private, Non-POTW, and Federal).
Facility Site Name
The name of the facility.
Facility Site Address
The address of the physical facility location.
Facility Site City
The name of the city, town, village, or other locality, when identifiable, within whose boundaries (the majority of) the facility site is located.  This is not always the same as the city used for USPS mail delivery.
Facility Site State 
The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) abbreviation that represents the state or state equivalent for the U.S. where the facility is located.
Facility Site Zip Code
The combination of the 5-digit Zone Improvement Plan (ZIP) code and the 4-digit extension code (if available) that represents the geographic segment that is a sub unit of the ZIP Code assigned by the U.S. Postal Service to a geographic location where the facility is located.
Facility Site Tribal Land Indicator
The Bureau of Indian Affairs code for every unit of land trust allotment ("tribal land") within Indian Country. This code will identify whether the facility is on tribal land and the name of the American Indian tribe or Alaskan Native entity (if applicable).
Facility Site Longitude
The measure of the angular distance on a meridian east or west of the prime meridian for the facility. Entered in either Decimal Degrees or in Degrees Minutes Seconds; stored in decimal degrees and in accordance with Environmental Data Standards Council, Latitude/Longitude Data Standard, Standard No.: EX000017.2, January 6, 2006
Facility Site Latitude
The measure of the angular distance on a meridian north or south of the equator for the facility.  Entered in either Decimal Degrees or in Degrees Minutes Seconds; stored in decimal degrees and in accordance with Environmental Data Standards Council, Latitude/Longitude Data Standard, Standard No.: EX000017.2, January 6, 2006.
Facility Site Source Map Scale Number
The number that represents the proportional distance on the ground for one unit of measure on the map or photo for the facility. These data are provided in accordance with Environmental Data Standards Council, Latitude/Longitude Data Standard, Standard No.: EX000017.2, January 6, 2006.
Facility Site Horizontal Accuracy Measure
The measure of the accuracy (in meters) of the facility's latitude and longitude coordinates. These data are provided in accordance with Environmental Data Standards Council, Latitude/Longitude Data Standard, Standard No.: EX000017.2, January 6, 2006.
Facility Site Horizontal Collection Method
The text that describes the method used to determine the latitude and longitude coordinates for the facility. These data are provided in accordance with Environmental Data Standards Council, Latitude/Longitude Data Standard, Standard No.: EX000017.2, January 6, 2006.
Facility Site Horizontal Reference Datum
The code/description that represents the reference datum used in determining latitude and longitude coordinates for the facility. These data are provided in accordance with Environmental Data Standards Council, Latitude/Longitude Data Standard, Standard No.: EX000017.2, January 6, 2006.
Facility Site Reference Point
The code/description for the place for which geographic coordinates were established. These data are provided in accordance with Environmental Data Standards Council, Latitude/Longitude Data Standard, Standard No.: EX000017.2, January 6, 2006.
Facility Individual Affiliation Type Code
The way that the contact or address is affiliated with the facility (e.g., "Owner," "Operator," or "Main Contact"). This is a unique code that identifies the nature of the individual's affiliation to the facility. 
Facility Individual First Name
The given name of an individual affiliated with this facility.
Facility Individual Last Name
The surname of an individual affiliated with this facility.
Facility Individual Title
The title held by an individual in an organization affiliated with this facility.
Facility Individual Organization
The legal, formal name of an organization that is affiliated with the individual affiliated with this facility.
Facility Individual Street Address
The physical address of the individual affiliated with this facility.
Facility Individual City
The name of the city, town, village, or other locality for the individual affiliated with this facility.
Facility Individual State
The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) abbreviation that represents the state or state equivalent for the U.S. for the individual affiliated with this facility.
Facility Individual Zip Code
The combination of the 5-digit Zone Improvement Plan (ZIP) code and the 4-digit extension code (if available) that represents the geographic segment that is a sub unit of the ZIP Code assigned by the U.S. Postal Service to a geographic location for the individual affiliated with this facility.
Facility Individual E-Mail Address
The e-mail address of the designated individual affiliated with this facility.
Facility Organization Formal Name
The legal, formal name of an organization that is affiliated with the facility.
Facility Organization Street Address
The physical address of the organization affiliated with the facility.
Facility Organization City
The name of the city of the organization that is affiliated with the facility.
Facility Organization State
The U.S. Postal Service abbreviation that represents the state or state equivalent for the organization affiliated with the facility.
Facility Organization Zip Code
The combination of the 5-digit Zone Improvement Plan (ZIP) code and the 4-digit extension code (if available) that represents the geographic segment that is a sub unit of the ZIP Code assigned by the U.S. Postal Service to a geographic location for the organization affiliated with the facility.
Basic Permit Information
NPDES ID
This is the unique NPDES permit number.
Master General Permit Number
The unique identifier of the master general permit, which is linked to a General Permit Covered Facility.
Permit Type
The unique code/description identifying the type of permit.
Permit Issue Date
This is the date the permit was issued. The date data must be provided in 
CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
Permit Modification/Amendment Date
This is the date on which the permit was modified or amended. The date data must be provided in CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
Permit Application Total Design Flow
This is the flow that a permitted facility was designed to accommodate, in millions of gallons per day (MGD), as stated on its NPDES application.
Permit Application Total Actual Average Flow
This is the actual average flow that a permitted facility will likely accommodate, in MGD, as stated on its NPDES application.
Permit Application/NOI Received Date
This is the date on which the application for a NPDES permit was received or a Notice of Intent (NOI) for coverage under a master general permit was received. The date data must be provided in CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
Associated NPDES ID Numbers
If applicable, the unique identifier for a NPDES Permit that is related to another NPDES Permit or other NPDES ID number.  For example, this data element could be used to identify the receiving POTW's permit number for an industrial user, the recipient POTW's permit number for a satellite collection system, municipalities covered under the same MS4 permit, etc.
SIC Codes
The four-digit Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code/description that represents the economic activity of the permitted facility.
NAICS Codes
The six-digit North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code/description that represents the economic activity of the permitted facility.
Permittee Street Address
The address that describes the physical location of the permit holder.
Permittee Organization Formal Name
The legal, formal name of the organization that holds the permit.
Permittee Zip Code
The combination of the 5-digit Zone Improvement Plan (ZIP) code and the 4-digit extension code (if available) that represents the geographic segment that is a sub unit of the ZIP Code assigned by the U.S. Postal Service to a geographic location for the permit holder.
Permittee City
The name of the city, town, or village where the mail is delivered for the permit holder.
Permittee State
The U.S. Postal Service abbreviation that represents the state or state equivalent for the U.S. for the permit holder.
Description
The unique code/ description that identifies the type of narrative condition.
Narrative Condition Number
This identifies a narrative condition and its elements uniquely for a permit.
Schedule Date
The date on which a schedule event is due to be completed and against which compliance will be measured. The date data must be provided in CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
Actual Date
The date on which the permittee achieved the schedule event. The date data must be provided in CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
Report Received Date
The date on which the regulatory authority receives a report (generally a letter) from the permittee indicating that a Schedule Event was completed (e.g., Start Construction) or the required report was enclosed. The date data must be provided in CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
Event
The code/ description indicating the particular event with which the permittee is scheduled to comply.
Biosolids Information on NPDES Permit Application or Notice of Intent
Average Annual Dry Biosolids Production
The average annual amount of biosolids (in dry metric tons) produced by the permitted facility. 
Average Annual Amount of Exceptional Quality (EQ) Product Distributed and Marketed 
The average annual amount (in dry metric tons) of Exceptional Quality (EQ) biosolids product distributed and marketed. This refers to biosolids that meet the ceiling concentrations in Table 1 of §503.13 and the pollutant concentrations in Table 3 of §503.13; the Class A pathogen requirements in §503.32(a); and one of the vector attraction reduction requirements in §503.33(b)(1) through (b)(8). 
Average Annual Amount of Land Applied Biosolids
The average annual amount (in dry metric tons) of biosolids land applied.
Average Annual Amount of Incinerated Biosolids
The average annual amount (in dry metric tons) of biosolids incinerated.
Average Annual Amount of Biosolids Co-Disposed in MSW
The average annual amount (in dry metric tons) of biosolids co-disposed in a municipal solids waste (MSW) landfill.
Average Annual Amount of Biosolids Surface Disposal
The average annual amount (in dry metric tons) of biosolids used for surface disposal.
Average Annual Amount of Biosolids Otherwise  Managed
The average annual amount (in dry metric tons) of biosolids managed using methods not otherwise described. For example, if a POTW sends its biosolids to a regional composter or heat dryer, that tonnage would included in this data element.
Biosolids Management Facility Type
The unique code indicating whether the facility was issued a permit as a biosolids generator, processor, or end user disposal site.
Animal Feeding Operation Information on NPDES Permit Application or Notice of Intent
Facility CAFO Flag
A binary "yes/no" flag to indicate whether the facility is a Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO).
Facility Animal Types
The unique code/description that identifies the animal sector(s) at the facility.
Facility Annual Average Total Number
The annual average total number of each type of livestock at the facility.
Facility Annual Average Total Number (Unhoused Confinement)
The annual average total number of each type of livestock at the facility in unhoused confinement. This is the number of animals, by type, in open confinement that are held at the facility for a total of 45 days or more on an annual basis.
Permit/NOI CAFO Waste Type
The type of CAFO waste described (i.e., manure, litter, process wastewater).
Permit/NOI Status of the CAFO Waste
The status of the CAFO waste described (i.e., generated, or generated and transferred).
Permit/NOI 12-Month Amount of CAFO Waste
The total amount of each CAFO waste (i.e.,, manure, litter, or process wastewater) (in tons) with that status (i.e., generated, or generated and transferred) from this facility in the previous 12 months.
Total Number of Acres for Land Application Covered by the Nutrient Management Plan
Total number of acres (to the nearest quarter acre) for land application covered by the nutrient management plan in the previous 12 months.
Facility Manure Containment or Storage Containment Type Code
The unique code/description for the type(s) of manure containment and storage used by the operation.
Facility Manure Annual Average Total Capacity
The annual average total capacity (in gallons) of manure containment and storage structure(s).
Construction and Industrial Stormwater Information on NPDES Permit Application, Notice of Intent, or Waiver Request
Total Area of the Site
This is the total area (to the nearest quarter acre) of the facility site.
Total Activity Area 
Total area (to the nearest quarter acre) of the facility that contains industrial activities and processes and construction activities. These activities and processes may include (but is not limited to) using, storing or cleaning industrial machinery or equipment, and areas where residuals from using, storing or cleaning industrial machinery or equipment remain and are exposed to stormwater; materials or products stored outdoors; materials contained in open, deteriorated or leaking storage drums, barrels, tanks, and similar containers; and materials or products from past industrial activity. Construction activities include excavation of lands.
Current Total Imperious Area
The current total impervious area (to the nearest quarter acre) of the facility or site.
Post-Construction Total Impervious Area
Total impervious area (to the nearest quarter acre) of the permitted facility impervious area after the construction addressed in the permit application is completed.
Proposed Best Management Practices for Industrial Activities and Stormwater
This is a text field that describes the proposed measures, including best management practices, to control pollutants in storm water discharges during construction, including a brief description of applicable State and local erosion and sediment control requirements.
Post-Construction Best Management Practices for Industrial Activities and Stormwater Discharges
This is a text field that describes the proposed measures to control pollutants in storm water discharges that will occur after construction operations have been completed, including a brief description of applicable State or local erosion and sediment control requirements. This field also describes the nature of fill material and existing data describing soils. 
Soil and Fill Material Description
This field describes the nature of fill material and existing data describing soils.
Runoff Coefficient of the Site
This is an estimate of the runoff coefficient of the site after the construction addressed in the permit application is completed.
Estimated Construction Project Start Date
The estimated start date for the construction project covered by the NPDES permit. The date data must be provided in CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
Estimated Construction Project End Date
The estimated end date for the construction project covered by the NPDES permit. The date data must be provided in CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Information on NPDES Permit Application or Notice of Intent
MS4 Permit Class
This is the code/description that identifies the size of the MS4 permit holder (small/medium/large).
MS4 Public Education Program
The unique code/description that identifies the public education programs the permittee intends to use to distribute educational materials to the community.
MS4 Measurable Goals Associated With Public Education Program
The unique code/description that identifies the types of measurable goals associated with the public education programs.
MS4 Public Involvement and Participation Program
The unique code/description that identifies the public involvement and participation programs the permittee intend to use to distribute educational materials to the community.
MS4 Measurable Goals for the Public Involvement and Participation Program
The unique code/description that identifies the types of measurable goals associated with the public involvement and participation programs.
MS4 System Map
A data flag indicating whether the permittee has developed a storm sewer system map showing the location of all outfalls and names and locations of all waters of the U.S. that receive discharges from those outfalls.
MS4 Prohibition Enforcement
The unique code/description that identifies the procedures and actions the permittee will take to enforce the prohibition on non-stormwater discharges to the MS4.
MS4 Detecting Non-Stormwater Discharges
The unique code/description that identifies the procedures and actions the permittee will take to detect and address non-stormwater discharges, including illegal dumping, to permittee's system.
MS4 Public Education: Illegal Discharges
The unique code/description that identifies the procedures and actions the permittee will take to inform public employees, businesses and the general public of hazards associated with illegal discharges and improper disposal of waste.
MS4 Construction Runoff Ordinance
The unique code/description that identifies the permittee's ordinance or other regulatory mechanism, including sanctions to ensure compliance, to require erosion and sediment controls.
MS4 Erosion and Sediment Controls
The unique code/description that identifies the permittee's requirements for construction site operators to implement appropriate erosion and sediment control BMPs.
MS4 Construction Site Waste
The unique code/description that identifies the permittee's requirements for construction site operators to control waste such as discarded building materials, concrete truck washout, chemicals, litter, and sanitary waste at the construction site that may cause adverse impacts to water quality.
MS4 Construction Site Review
The unique code/description that identifies the permittee's procedures for site plan review which incorporate consideration of potential water quality impacts.
MS4 Public Information
The unique code/description that identifies the permittee's procedures for receipt and consideration of information submitted by the public.
MS4 Site Inspections And Enforcement
The unique code/description that identifies the permittee's procedures for site inspection and enforcement of control measures.
MS4 Controls For Stormwater From New Development And Redevelopment
The unique code/description that identifies the combination of structural and/or non-structural best management practices (BMPs), which the permittee is using to address stormwater runoff from new development and redevelopment projects that disturb greater than or equal to one acre. 
MS4 Stormwater Ordinance For New Development And Redevelopment
The unique code/description that identifies the permittee's ordinance or other regulatory mechanism to address post-construction runoff from new development and redevelopment projects.
MS4 Maintenance Of BMPs
The unique code/description that identifies the permittee's program to ensure adequate long-term operation and maintenance of BMPs used for controlling runoff from new development and development projects.
MS4 Runoff From Municipal Operations
The unique code/description that identifies the permittee's operation and maintenance program that includes a training component and has the ultimate goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff from municipal operations.
MS4 Additional Measures
The unique code/description that identifies the any other additional measures in the permittee's stormwater management program that is required by the permit. 
MS4 Measurable Goals for Additional Measures
The unique code/description that identifies the measurable goal for each of the programs or BMPs to address stormwater including, as appropriate, the months and years in which the permittee will undertake required actions, including interim milestones and the frequency of the action
Collection System Information on NPDES Permit Application or Notice of Intent
Name of Collection System
This is the name of each collection system (by municipality or area) providing flow to the permittee. This includes unincorporated connector districts.
Owner Name of Collection System
This is the owner name of each collection system (by municipality or area) providing flow to the permittee. This includes unincorporated connector districts.
Owner Type of Collection System
This is the ownership type of each collection system (including municipality owned, privately owned). This includes unincorporated connector districts.
Permit Number for Collection System
This is the NPDES permit number (if applicable) of each collection system (by municipality or area) providing flow to the permittee. This includes unincorporated connector districts.
Population of Collection System
This is the population served for each collection system (by municipality or area) that provides flow to the permittee. This includes unincorporated connector districts.
Percentage of Collection System That Is a Combined Sewer System
This is the percentage of the collection system, for each collection system (by municipality or area), that is a combined sewer system.  This includes unincorporated connector districts.
Combined Sewer System Information on NPDES Permit Application or Notice of Intent
Complete and Implement a Long-Term CSO Control Plan
 All Phase II and post-Phase II combined sewer system NPDES permittees are required to complete and implement a long-term CSO control plan as described in EPA's Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control Policy (19 April 1994; 59 Federal Register 18688-18698). This data element identifies whether the permit requires the permit holder to complete and implement a long-term CSO control plan and whether the permit holder is in compliance with this permit language.
Nine Minimum CSO Controls Developed
All combined sewer system NPDES permittees are required to implement the nine minimum controls outlined in EPA's Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control Policy (19 April 1994; 59 Federal Register 18688-18698). This data element identifies whether the permit holder developed the nine minimum controls in compliance with permit language.
Nine Minimum CSO Controls Implemented
All combined sewer system NPDES permittees are required to implement the nine minimum controls outlined in EPA's Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control Policy (19 April 1994; 59 Federal Register 18688-18698). This data element identifies whether the permit holder implemented the nine minimum controls in compliance with permit language.
Enforcement Mechanism for the LTCP
 All Phase II and post-Phase II combined sewer system NPDES permittees are required to complete and implement a long-term CSO control plan as described in EPA's Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control Policy (19 April 1994; 59 Federal Register 18688-18698). This data element identifies the type of enforcement mechanism used to require the development and implementation of a LTCP. 
LTCP Submitted
 All Phase II and post-Phase II combined sewer system NPDES permittees are required to complete and implement a long-term CSO control plan as described in EPA's Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control Policy (19 April 1994; 59 Federal Register 18688-18698).  This data element identifies whether the permit holder submitted the LTCP for approval by the permitting authority.  
LTCP Approved
 All Phase II and post-Phase II combined sewer system NPDES permittees are required to complete and implement a long-term CSO control plan as described in EPA's Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control Policy (19 April 1994; 59 Federal Register 18688-18698). This data element identifies whether the LTCP submitted by the permit holder was approved by the permitting authority.  
LTCP Approval Date
 All Phase II and post-Phase II combined sewer system NPDES permittees are required to complete and implement a long-term CSO control plan as described in EPA's Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control Policy (19 April 1994; 59 Federal Register 18688-18698). This data element identifies the date when the permitting authority approved the LTCP. The date data must be provided in CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
Actual Date Completed LTCP and CSO Controls
 All Phase II and post-Phase II combined sewer system NPDES permittees are required to complete and implement a long-term CSO control plan as described in EPA's Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control Policy (19 April 1994; 59 Federal Register 18688-18698). This data element identifies the date by which the permit holder completed all required LTCP and CSO controls.  The date data must be provided in CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
Enforceable Schedule to Complete LTCP and CSO Controls
 All Phase II and post-Phase II combined sewer system NPDES permittees are required to complete and implement a long-term CSO control plan as described in EPA's Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control Policy (19 April 1994; 59 Federal Register 18688-18698). This data element identifies whether the permit holder is on an enforceable schedule to complete all required LTCP and CSO controls. 
Other CSO Control Measures with Compliance Schedule
This data element identifies whether the permit holder has other CSO control measures specified in a compliance schedule, beyond those identified in the nine minimum controls, LTCP, or a plan for sewer system separation.
Approved Post-Construction Compliance Monitoring Program
This data element indicates whether the permit holder is currently operating under an approved post-construction compliance monitoring program.
Pretreatment Information on NPDES Permit Application, Notice of Intent, (or Pretreatment Compliance Audit or Inspection) (this includes permit application data required for all new and existing POTWs (40 CFR 122.21(j)(6))
Pretreatment Program Required Indicator
The code/description indicating if the permitted municipality is required to develop a pretreatment program.
Pretreatment Program Approved Date
The date the pretreatment program was approved. The date data must be provided in CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
Approval Authority Name
The name of the agency that is the designated approval authority.
Program Modification Date for Required Pretreatment Streamlining Changes
EPA's Pretreatment Streamlining Rule (14 October 2005; 70 Federal Register 60134-60198) revised several provisions of the General Pretreatment Regulations (40 CFR Part 403). In particular, the Pretreatment Streamlining Rule made 13 more stringent changes to the General Pretreatment provisions (40 CFR Part 403). The rule requires that EPA and state NPDES permitting authorities revise NPDES permits and approved pretreatment program authorizations to require implementation of these 13 more stringent changes. This is the date when the Control Authority adopted the required 13 changes from the Pretreatment Streamlining Rule. The date data must be provided in CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
Program Modification Date for Optional Pretreatment Streamlining Changes
 EPA's Pretreatment Streamlining Rule (14 October 2005; 70 Federal Register 60134-60198) revised several provisions of the General Pretreatment Regulations (40 CFR Part 403). In particular, the Pretreatment Streamlining Rule made 7 changes to the General Pretreatment provisions (40 CFR Part 403) that provide more flexibility. The rule give EPA and state NPDES permitting authorities the option to revise NPDES permits and approved pretreatment program authorizations for these 7 changes. This is the date when the Control Authority adopted the optional 7 changes from the Pretreatment Streamlining Rule. The date data must be provided in CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
Program Modification Type for Optional Pretreatment Streamlining Changes
 EPA's Pretreatment Streamlining Rule (14 October 2005; 70 Federal Register 60134-60198) revised several provisions of the General Pretreatment Regulations (40 CFR Part 403). In particular, the Pretreatment Streamlining Rule made 7 changes to the General Pretreatment provisions (40 CFR Part 403) that provide more flexibility. This data element identifies which of the 7 optional provisions from the Pretreatment Streamlining Rule were adopted by the Control Authority.
Significant Industrial User Name
The name of each Significant Industrial User (SIU) that is discharging (including truck transportation) to this POTW.
Significant Industrial User Address
The mailing address of each Significant Industrial User (SIU) that is discharging (including truck transportation) to this POTW.
Significant Industrial User City
The name of the city, town, village, or other locality, when identifiable, within whose boundaries (the majority of) for each Significant Industrial User (SIU) that is discharging (including truck transportation) to this POTW.
Significant Industrial User State 
The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) abbreviation that represents the state or state equivalent for the U.S. for each Significant Industrial User (SIU) that is discharging (including truck transportation) to this POTW.
Significant Industrial User Zip Code
The combination of the 5-digit Zone Improvement Plan (ZIP) code and the 4-digit extension code (if available) that represents the geographic segment that is a sub unit of the ZIP Code assigned by the U.S. Postal Service to a geographic location for each Significant Industrial User (SIU) that is discharging (including truck transportation) to this POTW.
Significant Industrial User Subject to Local Limits
This data element will identify for each Significant Industrial User (SIU) that is discharging (including truck transportation) to this POTW whether the SIU is subject to local limits.
Significant Industrial User Subject to Local Limits More Stringent Than Categorical Standards 
This data element will identify for each Significant Industrial User (SIU) that is discharging (including truck transportation) to this POTW whether the SIU is subject to local limits that are more stringent than the applicable categorical standards.
Industrial User Subject to Categorical Standards
This data element will identify for each Significant Industrial User (SIU) that is discharging (including truck transportation) to this POTW whether the SIU is subject to categorical standards.
Applicable Categorical Standards
This data element will identify for each Significant Industrial User (SIU) that is discharging (including truck transportation) to this POTW the applicable categorical standards.
Significant Industrial User Process Wastewater Flow Rate
This data element will identify for each Significant Industrial User (SIU) that is discharging (including truck transportation) to this POTW the process wastewater flow rate (in gallons per day).
Type of Significant Industrial User Process Wastewater Flow
This data element will identify for each Significant Industrial User (SIU) that is discharging (including truck transportation) to this POTW the type of process wastewater flow (continuous or intermittent).
Significant Industrial User Non-Process Wastewater Flow Rate
This data element will identify for each Significant Industrial User (SIU) that is discharging (including truck transportation) to this POTW the non-process wastewater flow rate (in gallons per day).
Type of Significant Industrial User Non-Process Wastewater Flow
This data element will identify for each Significant Industrial User (SIU) that is discharging (including truck transportation) to this POTW the type of non-process wastewater flow (continuous or intermittent).
Industrial User Causing Problems at POTW
This data element will identify for each Significant Industrial User (SIU) whether it caused or contributed to any problems (including upset, bypass, interference, pass-through) at this POTW within the past four and one-half years. EPA regulations require the Control Authority to develop and enforce local limits when the discharge from an IU causes or contributes to any problems (including upset, interference, bypass) at the receiving POTW's effluent discharge or biosolids.
Receiving RCRA Waste
This data element will identify whether the POTW has received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail, or dedicated pipe within the last three years. 
Receiving Remediation Waste
This data element will identify whether the POTW has received RCRA or CERLCA waste from off-site remedial activities within the last three years.
Control Authority Name
The name of the Control Authority for the Significant Industrial User discharging to this POTW. This will be the name of the State or EPA Region when they are the Control Authority.  This field may also come from the pretreatment compliance audit or inspection.
Control Authority NPDES Permit Number
The NPDES permit number of the Control Authority for the Significant Industrial User discharging to this POTW.  This field may also come from the pretreatment compliance audit or inspection.

Cooling Water Intake Information on NPDES Permit Application or Notice of Intent
Type of Facility
The unique code/description that identifies the type of facility based on regulations, 1 = New Facility under 125 Subpart I, 2 = New Offshore Oil & gas Facility under 40 CFR 125 Subpart N, 3 = Existing Facility under 40 CFR 125 Subpart J, 4 = BPJ Facility over 2 MGD under 40 CFR 125.90(b), 401.14.
Number of Cooling Water Intake Structures (CWISs)
The number of cooling water intake structures (CWISs) at the facility.
Design Intake Flow for Cooling Water Intake Structure
The design intake flow (DIF), in units of MGD, is the total designed amount of flow for each permitted cooling water intake structure. This value is based on maximum design flow capacities.
Actual Intake Flow for Cooling Water Intake Structure
This actual flow value, in units of MGD, is intended to represent on-the-ground intake flow capacities in the preceding year, as opposed to the DIF, which is based on maximum design flow capacities.
Average Reported Intake Flow for Cooling Water Intake Structure
This average flow value, in units of MGD, is intended to represent on-the-ground intake flow capacities in the preceding year, as opposed to the DIF, which is based on maximum design flow capacities.
Percentage of Intake for Cooling Purposes
This is the percentage of water intake that is used for cooling purposes for each permitted cooling water intake structure.
Location Type for Cooling Water Intake Structure
The unique code/description that identifies the location and description for each intake. These values are 1=shoreline intake description (flushed, recessed), 2= intake canal, 3=embayment, bank, or cove, 4=submerged offshore intake, 5=near-shore submerged intake, 6=shoreline submerged intake.
Distance Offshore for Submerged Cooling Water Intake Structure
The distance (in feet) from shore for each CWIS.
Maximum Through-Screen Velocity
This is the maximum velocity (in feet/second) of the water intake through the screen for each permitted cooling water intake structure.
Average Through-Screen Velocity
This is the average through-screen velocity (in feet/second) of the water intake through the screen for each permitted cooling water intake structure.
Percentage of Mean Annual Flow Withdrawn  -  Fresh Water Facilities
The percentage of the source water annual mean flow withdrawn as compared to the total design intake flow from all cooling water intake structures located in a freshwater river or stream at the permitted facility.
Percentage of Design Intake Flow over Tidal Cycle  -  Tidal River or Estuary Facilities
The percentage of the volume of the water column within the area centered about the opening of the intake in a tidal river or estuary with a diameter defined by the distance of one tidal excursion at the mean low water level as compared to the facility's total design intake flow over one tidal cycle of ebb and flow.
Waterbody Type
The unique code/description that describes the impingement control technologies for each CWIS.  A value of 1 = Ocean, 2 = Estuary, 3 = Great Lake, 4 = Fresh River, 5 = Lake/Reservoir.
Canal/Fish Return Length
This is the length for any fish return system at the permitted facility.
Significant Navigation or Waterbody Use Type Near The Intake Entrance
The unique code/description for the type of navigation or waterbody use near each CWIS. A value of 1 (one) indicates the intake is located where boat/barge navigation near the intake is a consideration when making any potential modifications to the intake. A value of 0 (zero) indicates navigation does not occur in the vicinity of the intake. Navigational considerations affect which impingement and entrainment technologies may be used by intakes located in embayments, banks, or coves.
Mean Intake Water Depth
This is the mean depth (in feet) for each CWIS. This value is used for the estimation of total existing screen width.
Intake Well Depth
The intake well depth (in feet) is the distance from the intake deck to the bottom of the screen well for each CWIS, and includes both water depth and distance from the water surface to the deck. The intake well depth is used to select the depth of the required screen.
Debris Loading
The unique code/description that describes the amount of debris near each CWIS. A value of 1 (one) indicates high levels of debris and trash near the intake. A value of 0 (zero) indicates debris is low or negligible. A facility that uses a trash rack is likely to have a high debris loading.
Impingement Control Technology In-Place
The unique code/description that describes the impingement control technologies for each CWIS. A value of 1= Modified Traveling Screens, 2= Passive Intake (Velocity Cap, Coarse Wedgewire Screens, Porous Dam, Leaky Dike, etc.), 3= Barrier net, and 4 = Fish Diversion or Avoidance (Louvers, Acoustics, etc.)., 5 = Other technology.  A value of zero means no controls.
Entrainment Control Technology in-Place
The unique code/description that describes the entrainment control technologies for each CWIS. A value of 1= Traveling Screens w/ Fine Mesh, 2= Far Offshore Intake, and 3 = Passive Screens w/ Fine Mesh, 4 = Closed-Cycle Recirculating System, 5 = Other Technology.  A value of zero means no controls.
Track II Comprehensive Demonstration Study Submission Date
The date of any submission of any Track II Comprehensive Demonstration Study. The date data must be provided in CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
Design and Construction Technology Plan Submission Date
The submission date of any Design and Construction Technology Plan. The date data must be provided in CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
Source Water Biological Study Submission Date
The submission date of any Source Water Biological Study. The date data must be provided in CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
Verification Monitoring Plan Submission Date
The submission date of any Verification Monitoring Plan. The date data must be provided in CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
Source Water Physical Data Submission Date
The submission date of any Source Water Physical Data. The date data must be provided in CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
Cooling Water Intake Structure Data Submission Date
The submission date of any Cooling Water Intake Structure Data. The date data must be provided in CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
Source Water Baseline Biological Characterization Data Submission Date
The submission date of any Source Water Baseline Biological Characterization Data. The date data must be provided in CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
New Facilities  -  Alternative Requirements Provision Request Approval Date
The approval date of any request under the Alternative Requirements provision as defined under 40 CFR 125.85 or 40 CFR 125.135. The date data must be provided in CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
CWA Section 316(a) Thermal Variance Information on NPDES Permit Application or Notice of Intent
Thermal Variance Unit
This is the unit of measure (e.g., [o]F or [o]C of discharged effluent, [o]F or [o]C different between discharged effluent and receiving waterbody,  [o]F or [o]C different between discharged effluent and inlet water source) associated with numeric value of the alternative effluent limitation granted.
Thermal Variance Granted
This is a flag indicating whether the permitting authority has granted the permittee a CWA 316(a) variance for the controlling NPDES permit.
Thermal Variance Value
This is the numeric value of the alternative effluent limitation granted.
Thermal Variance Date
This is the date when the permitting authority granted the permittee a CWA 316(a) variance for the controlling NPDES permit. The date data must be provided in CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
Thermal Variance Study Date
This is the date when the facility submitted new studies/data based on actual operation experience to support the continuation of the variance. The date data must be provided in CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
Compliance Monitoring Activity (Discharge Monitoring Report, and Pretreatment SIU Periodic Compliance Reports in Municipalities without an Approved Pretreatment Program)
Permitted Feature
The identifier assigned for each location at which conditions are being applied.
Limit Set
The unique identifier tying the DMR form to its Limit Set record.
Parameter Code
The unique code/description identifying the parameter reported on the DMR.
Monitoring Location
The code/description of the monitoring location at which the sampling occurred for a DMR parameter.
Monitoring Period End Date
The date that the monitoring period for the values covered by this DMR form ends. The date data must be provided in CCYY-MM-DD format where CC is the century, YY is the year, MM is the month and DD is the day.
NODI
The unique code/description that indicates the reason that "No Discharge" or "No Data" was reported in place of the DMR value.
Value
The DMR value number reported on the DMR form.
Concentration Units/ Quantity Units
The code/description representing the unit of measure applicable to quantity or concentration limits and measurements as entered by the user on the DMR form.
Value Type
The unique code/description identifying a DMR value type (i.e. Quantity 1, Quantity 2, Concentration 1, Concentration 2, Concentration 3).
Qualifier
The unique code identifying the limit value operator (e.g., <, =, >).
Civil Penalty Amount Assessed
For civil judicial Enforcement Actions, the dollar amount of the penalty assessed against the defendant(s) as specified in the final entered Consent Decree or Court Order.  For Administrative Enforcement Actions, it is the dollar amount of the penalty assessed in the Consent/Final Order.
Civil Penalty Amount Collected
For civil judicial Enforcement Actions, the dollar amount of the penalty collected from the defendant(s). For Administrative Enforcement Actions, it is the dollar amount collected of the penalty assessed in the Consent/Final Order.

   4. EPA prioritization of base data needed to support the tool (e.g., limit data needed to enable e-DMR).

      All permit required, system required and programmatic data would have to be loaded in the national system. For example limits, limit sets, limit values do not exist for eNOI data entered into OW's system. Some state eNOI data may exist in the national system where the states utilize the national system for records.