Document ID: FAA-2012-1069-0008
Agency: faa
Document Type: Proposed Rule
Title: Airworthiness Directives: The Boeing Company Airplanes
Posted Date: 2013-08-13T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 13, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49217-49221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19527]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-1069; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-044-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; the Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); reopening of 
comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier proposed airworthiness directive 
(AD), for all The Boeing Company Model 727 airplanes, which proposed to 
supersede an existing AD. That NPRM proposed to retain repetitive 
inspections of the in-tank fuel boost pump wiring, installation of 
sleeving over the in-tank fuel boost pump wires, repetitive inspections 
of a certain electrical wire, sleeve, and conduit, and applicable 
investigative and corrective actions; and repetitive engine fuel 
suction feed operational tests. That NPRM proposed to also require 
replacement of the wire bundles for the wing and center fuel boost 
pumps, installation of convoluted liners, and related investigative and 
corrective actions if necessary. That NPRM also proposed to require 
replacement of the fuel quantity indicating system (FQIS) wires; a low-
frequency eddy current inspection for cracking; and repair if 
necessary. That NPRM also proposed to require revising the maintenance 
program to incorporate changes to the airworthiness limitations 
section. That NPRM was prompted by a report of damage found to the 
sleeve, jacket, and insulation on an electrical wire during a 
repetitive inspection. This action revises that NPRM by revising 
certain compliance times, specifying a terminating action, and adding a 
proposed requirement to incorporate another change to the airworthiness 
limitations section. We are proposing this supplemental NPRM to prevent 
chafing of the fuel boost pump electrical wiring and leakage of fuel 
into the conduit, and to prevent electrical arcing between the wiring 
and the surrounding conduit, which could result in arc-through of the 
conduit, and consequent fire or explosion of the fuel tank. Since these 
actions impose an additional burden over that proposed in the NPRM, we 
are reopening the comment period to allow the public the chance to 
comment on these proposed changes.

DATES: We must receive comments on this supplemental NPRM by September 
27, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: 202-493-2251.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing 
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 
3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-5000, 
extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. 
You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, 
Transport

[[Page 49218]]

Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information 
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility 
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory 
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street 
address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES 
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after 
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebel Nichols, Aerospace Engineer, 
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification 
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-
6509; fax: 425-917-6590; email: rebel.nichols@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or 
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address 
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-1069; 
Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-044-AD'' at the beginning of your 
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, 
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We 
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend 
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We 
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we 
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We issued an NPRM to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an AD that 
would apply to to all Boeing Model 727, 727C, 727-100, 727-100C, 727-
200, and 727-200F series airplanes, certificated in any category. That 
NPRM published in the Federal Register on October 11, 2012 (77 FR 
61731). That NPRM proposed to retain repetitive inspections of the in-
tank fuel boost pump wiring to detect chafing of the wire insulation, 
evidence of electrical arcing, or arc-through of the conduit wall, and 
applicable corrective action; and installation of sleeving over the in-
tank fuel boost pump wires. That NPRM also proposed to retain 
repetitive inspections for damage of a certain electrical wire and 
sleeve, and arcing damage of the conduit and signs of fuel leakage into 
the conduit; applicable investigative and corrective actions; and 
repetitive engine fuel suction feed operational tests. That NPRM 
proposed to require replacement of the wire bundles for the wing and 
center fuel boost pumps with new, improved wire bundles, installation 
of convoluted liners, and related investigative and corrective actions 
if necessary. That NPRM also proposed to require replacement of the 
FQIS wires with new, improved wires; a low-frequency eddy current 
inspection for cracking; and repair if necessary. That NPRM also 
proposed to require revising the maintenance program to incorporate 
changes to the airworthiness limitations section.

Actions Since Previous NPRM (77 FR 61731, October 11, 2012) Was Issued

    Since we issued the previous NPRM (77 FR 61731, October 11, 2012), 
we have determined that additional limitations are necessary and that 
the initial compliance time for one task must be reduced. The preamble 
to AD 2007-11-08, Amendment 39-15065 (72 FR 28594, May 22, 2007) 
explains that we consider the requirements ``interim action'' and were 
considering further rulemaking. We now have determined that further 
rulemaking is indeed necessary, and this proposed AD follows from that 
determination.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to comment on the NPRM (77 FR 
61731, October 11, 2012). The following presents the comments received 
on the NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.

Request To Add Airworthiness Limitations

    Boeing requested that we add ALI Task 28-AWL-18, ``Fuel Quantity 
Indicating System (FQIS)--Out-Tank Wiring Lightning Shield to Ground 
Termination,'' and Critical Design Configuration Control Limitation 
(CDCCL) Task 28-AWL-19, ``Fuel Quantity Indicating System (FQIS)--Out-
Tank Wiring Lightning Shield to Ground Termination'' to the original 
NPRM (77 FR 61731, October 11, 2012).
    We agree with the request. We have added new paragraph (n)(1) in 
this supplemental NPRM to require revising the maintenance program to 
include both tasks. These AWL's are necessary after accomplishing the 
actions specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-28A013, dated 
August 18, 2010, which is proposed in paragraph (m) of this 
supplemental NPRM.

Request for Correction

    Boeing requested that we correct the Relevant Service Information 
section and paragraph (n) of the NPRM (77 FR 61731, October 11, 2012) 
to refer to Section B rather than Section 9 of Boeing 727-100/200 
Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs), D6-8766-AWL, Revision August 2010. 
Boeing stated that there is no section 9 in that document.
    We agree with the request. Although the Relevant Service 
Information is not repeated in this supplemental NPRM, we have made the 
correction to new paragraph (n)(2) of this supplemental NPRM (which was 
paragraph (n) of the previous NPRM (77 FR 61731, October 11, 2012)).

Change to Compliance Time

    Paragraph (n) of the previous NPRM (77 FR 61731, October 11, 2012) 
specified a compliance time of 60 months after the effective date of 
the AD for accomplishing the initial task for Airworthiness Limitation 
Instruction (ALI) Task 28-AWL-20, ``Fuel Boost Pump Wires in Conduit 
Installation--In Fuel Tank;'' and CDCCL Task 28-AWL-21, ``Fuel Boost 
Pump Wires in Conduit Installation--In Fuel Tank,'' of Section B of 
Boeing 727-100/200 Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs), D6-8766-AWL, 
Revision August 2010. We have added paragraph (n)(2) to this 
supplemental NPRM to change the compliance time for accomplishing the 
initial task to within 72 months after accomplishing the actions 
specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 727-28A0133, dated October 5, 
2011.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this supplemental NPRM because we evaluated all 
the relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described 
previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same 
type design. Certain changes described above expand the scope of the 
previous NPRM (77 FR 61731, October 11, 2012). As a result, we have 
determined that it is necessary to reopen the comment period to provide 
additional opportunity for the public to comment on this supplemental 
NPRM.

Proposed Requirements of the Supplemental NPRM

    This supplemental NPRM would require accomplishing the actions

[[Page 49219]]

specified in the service information described previously, except as 
discussed under ``Differences Between the Supplemental NPRM and the 
Service Information.''

Differences Between the Supplemental NPRM and the Service Information

    Although Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-28A0133, dated October 
5, 2011, specifies that operators may contact the manufacturer for 
disposition of certain repair conditions, this proposed AD would 
require operators to repair those conditions using a method approved in 
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (p) of this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 569 airplanes of U.S. 
registry.We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed 
AD:

                                                                     Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                              Number of U.S.
             Action                   Labor cost              Parts cost               Cost per product          airplanes      Cost on U.S. operators
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection, test, and corrective  10 work-hours x     $0........................  $850......................             260  $221,000.
 actions [retained actions from    $85 per hour =
 existing AD 2007-11-08,           $850.
 Amendment 39-15065 (72 FR
 28594, May 22, 2007)].
Replacement [proposed action]...  185 work-hours x    $28,771...................  $44,496...................             569  $25,318,224.
                                   $85 per hour =
                                   $15,725.
Revise Maintenance Program        1 work-hour x $85   $0........................  $85.......................             569  $48,365.
 [proposed action].                per hour = $85.
Concurrent FQIS wire replacement  Up to 248 work-     Up to $34,865.............  Up to $55,945.............             569  Up to $31,832,705.
 [proposed action].                hours x $85 per
                                   hour = $21,080.
Concurrent low frequency eddy     2 work-hours x $85  $0........................  $170......................             569  $96,730.
 current (LFEC) inspection         per hour = $170.
 [proposed action].
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide 
a cost estimate for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed 
AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs'' 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This proposed regulation is 
within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe 
condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in 
this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not 
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship 
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed 
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies 
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness 
directive (AD):

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2012-1069; Directorate Identifier 
2012-NM-044-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by September 27, 2013.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD supersedes AD 2007-11-08, Amendment 39-15065 (72 FR 
28594, May 22, 2007).

(c) Applicability

    (1) This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 727, 727C, 
727-100, 727-100C, 727-200, and 727-200F series airplanes, 
certificated in any category.
    (2) This AD requires revisions to certain operator maintenance 
documents to include new actions (e.g., inspections) and/or Critical 
Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCLs). Compliance with 
these actions and/or CDCCLs is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For 
airplanes that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired 
in the areas addressed by this AD, the operator may not be able to 
accomplish the actions described in the revisions. In this 
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must 
request approval for an alternative method of compliance according 
to paragraph (p) of this AD. The request should include a 
description of changes to the required actions that will ensure the 
continued operational safety of the airplane.

[[Page 49220]]

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association 
(ATA) of America Code 28, Fuel.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report of damage found to the sleeve, 
jacket, and insulation on an electrical wire during a repetitive 
inspection. We are issuing this AD to prevent chafing of the fuel 
boost pump electrical wiring and leakage of fuel into the conduit, 
and to prevent electrical arcing between the wiring and the 
surrounding conduit, which could result in arc-through of the 
conduit, and consequent fire or explosion of the fuel tank.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, 
unless already done.

(g) Retained Compliance Times

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraphs (f), (g), 
and (h) of AD 2007-11-08, Amendment 39-15065 (72 FR 28594, May 22, 
2007).
    (1) For airplanes with 50,000 or more total flight hours as of 
June 28, 1999 (the effective date of AD 99-12-52, Amendment 39-11199 
(64 FR 33394, June 23, 1999)): Within 20 days after June 28, 1999, 
accomplish the requirements of paragraph (h) of this AD.
    (2) For airplanes with less than 50,000 total flight hours, but 
more than 30,000 total flight hours, as of June 28, 1999 (the 
effective date of AD 99-12-52, Amendment 39-11199 (64 FR 33394, June 
23, 1999)): Within 30 days after June 28, 1999, accomplish the 
requirements of paragraph (h) of this AD.
    (3) For airplanes with 30,000 total flight hours or less as of 
June 28, 1999 (the effective date of AD 99-12-52, Amendment 39-11199 
(64 FR 33394, June 23, 1999)): Within 90 days after June 28, 1999, 
accomplish the requirements of paragraph (h) of this AD.

(h) Retained Detailed Inspection, Corrective Action, and Installation

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i) of AD 
2007-11-08, Amendment 39-15065 (72 FR 28594, May 22, 2007).
    (1) Perform a detailed inspection of the in-tank fuel boost pump 
wire bundles, and applicable corrective actions; and, except as 
provided by paragraph (i) of this AD, install sleeving over the wire 
bundles; in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-
28A0126, dated May 24, 1999; Boeing Service Bulletin 727-28A0126, 
Revision 1, dated May 18, 2000; or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 
727-28A0132, dated February 22, 2007.
    (2) For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is: An 
intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or assembly 
to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is 
normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at an 
intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as mirror, 
magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning and 
elaborate procedures may be required.

(i) Retained Installation: Possible Deferral

    This paragraph restates the optional actions of paragraph (j) of 
AD 2007-11-08, Amendment 39-15065 (72 FR 28594, May 22, 2007). 
Installation of sleeving over the wire bundles, as required by 
paragraph (h) of this AD, may be deferred if, within 18 months or 
6,000 flight hours, whichever occurs first, after accomplishment of 
the inspection and applicable corrective actions required by 
paragraph (h) of this AD, the following actions are accomplished: 
Perform a detailed inspection of the in-tank fuel boost pump wire 
bundles, and applicable corrective actions; and install sleeving 
over the wire bundles; in accordance with Boeing Alert Service 
Bulletin 727-28A0126, dated May 24, 1999; Boeing Service Bulletin 
727-28A0126, Revision 1, dated May 18, 2000; or Boeing Alert Service 
Bulletin 727-28A0132, dated February 22, 2007.

(j) Retained Repetitive Inspections and Corrective Actions

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (k) of AD 
2007-11-08, Amendment 39-15065 (72 FR 28594, May 22, 2007). Repeat 
the detailed inspection and applicable corrective actions required 
by paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD, as applicable, at intervals 
not to exceed 30,000 flight hours, until the initial inspection, 
applicable corrective actions, and engine fuel suction feed 
operational test required by paragraph (k) of this AD have been 
done.

(k) Retained Inspection, Test, and Related Investigative and Corrective 
Actions

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (l) of AD 
2007-11-08, Amendment 39-15065 (72 FR 28594, May 22, 2007). For all 
airplanes: Within 120 days after June 6, 2007 (the effective date of 
AD 2007-11-08), or 5,000 flight hours after the last inspection or 
corrective action done before June 6, 2007, as required by paragraph 
(h), (i), or (j), as applicable, of this AD, whichever occurs later, 
do a detailed inspection for damage of the sleeve and electrical 
wire of the fuel boost pump, and do an engine fuel suction feed 
operational test; and, before further flight, do related 
investigative and corrective actions, as applicable; by doing all 
applicable actions in and in accordance with the Accomplishment 
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-28A0132, dated 
February 22, 2007. Repeat the detailed inspection and engine fuel 
suction feed operational test thereafter at intervals not to exceed 
15,000 flight cycles. Accomplishment of the initial inspection, 
applicable corrective actions, and engine fuel suction feed 
operational test of this paragraph terminates the requirements of 
paragraphs (h), (i), and (j) of this AD.

(l) New Installation

    Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD: Install 
new shielded wire bundles in convoluted liners in the wing and 
center fuel tank conduits and do all applicable related 
investigative and corrective actions, in accordance with the 
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-
28A0133, dated October 5, 2011. Related investigative and corrective 
actions must be done before further flight. Doing the actions 
specified in paragraphs (l) and (m) of this AD terminates the 
requirements of paragraphs (g), (h), (i), (j), and (k) of this AD.

(m) New Concurrent Requirement

    Before or concurrently with accomplishing the requirements of 
paragraph (l) of this AD, replace the fuel quantity indicating 
system (FQIS) wire bundles and do a low frequency eddy current 
inspection for cracking, in accordance with the Accomplishment 
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 727-28-0131, dated August 
18, 2010. If any cracking is found during the inspection, before 
further flight, repair using a method approved in accordance with 
the procedures specified in paragraph (p) of this AD.

(n) New Maintenance Program Revision

    (1) Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD: Revise 
the maintenance program to incorporate Airworthiness Limitation 
Instruction (ALI) Task 28-AWL-18, ``Fuel Quantity Indicating System 
(FQIS)--Out-Tank Wiring Lightning Shield to Ground Termination''; 
and CDCCL Task 28-AWL-19, ``Fuel Quantity Indicating System (FQIS)--
Out-Tank Wiring Lightning Shield to Ground Termination,'' of Section 
B of Boeing 727-100/200 Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs), D6-8766-
AWL, Revision August 2010. The initial compliance time for the 
inspections is within 120 months after accomplishing the actions 
required by paragraph (m) of this AD.
    (2) Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD: Revise 
the maintenance program to incorporate Airworthiness Limitation 
Instruction (ALI) Task 28-AWL-20, ``Fuel Boost Pump Wires in Conduit 
Installation--In Fuel Tank''; and CDCCL Task 28-AWL-21, ``Fuel Boost 
Pump Wires in Conduit Installation--In Fuel Tank,'' of Section B of 
Boeing 727-100/200 Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs), D6-8766-AWL, 
Revision August 2010. The initial compliance time for the 
inspections is within 72 months after accomplishing the actions 
required by paragraph (l) of this AD.

(o) No Alternative Actions, Intervals, and/or CDCCLs

    After accomplishing the revisions required by paragraphs (n)(1) 
and (n)(2) of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g., inspections), 
intervals, and/or CDCCLs may be used unless the actions, intervals, 
and/or CDCCLs are approved as an alternative method of compliance 
(AMOC) in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (p) 
of this AD.

(p) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local 
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending 
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 
attention of the person identified in the Related Information 
section of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.

[[Page 49221]]

    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding 
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the 
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization 
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO to make 
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must 
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must 
specifically refer to this AD.
    (4) AMOCs approved previously in accordance with AD 2007-11-08, 
Amendment 39-15065 (72 FR 28594, May 22, 2007), are approved as 
AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of this AD.

(q) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Rebel Nichols, 
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle 
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 
98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6509; fax: 425-917-6590; email: 
rebel.nichols@faa.gov.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact 
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, 
P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced 
service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of 
this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 2, 2013.
Ross Landes,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-19527 Filed 8-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P