Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0085-0707
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2023-08-16T04:00Z

From:
"Cornelius, Jay" <jcornelius@abccoke.com>
Sent:
Tue, 27 Sep 2022 13:26:50 
To:
Donna Jones <jones.donnalee@epa.gov>; "Coke.ICR2@rti.org" <Coke.ICR2@rti.org>; "mcginn.kevin@epa.gov" <mcginn.kevin@epa.gov>; "shappley.ned@epa.gov" <shappley.ned@epa.gov>; "graymond@rti.org" <graymond@rti.org>
Subject:
ABC Coke - Coke Oven RTR, ICR Enclosure 2 (Part) - Cooling Tower Testing Plan (REVISED)

Good afternoon,

Please find revised Cooling Tower Testing Plan attached.

Jay Cornelius
ABC Coke

<<AST-2022-3417 ABC Coke ICR Test Plan_F.pdf>>

﻿ -----Original Message-----
Sorry. A correction. See below from Kevin.
"..there should be 7 runs for THC, so if they amended table 2-1, it should be to indicate THC on all testing runs, i.e. THC and VOHAP for the second line of testing and THC, H2S, COS, and CS2 for the 3rd. The first line would still be 1 for THC, and the subsequent lines would still be 3. They are doing 7 total runs, we just want to be sure that THC is included as a parameter in all 7 runs."

Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and StandardsSector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711 
Tele:  (919)  541-5251 
Fax  (919)  541-3207
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.
Pronouns - She/Her/Hers
Salutation - Dr./Ms.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jones, DonnaLee Jones.Donnalee@epa.gov
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2022 2:43 PM
To: Cornelius, Jay <jcornelius@abccoke.com>; Coke.ICR2@rti.org; graymond@rti.org; Shappley, Ned <Shappley.Ned@epa.gov>; Mcginn, Kevin <mcginn.kevin@epa.gov>
Subject: RE: ABC Coke - Coke Oven RTR, ICR Enclosure 2 (Part) - Cooling Tower Testing Plan

Hi. 

We need some clarification and correction for your test plan. The 114 requires, in Table 1B "Perform at least seven (7) test runs of standard Appendix P, AND three (3) test runs of Appendix P with the TO-15A finish" (emphasis added with the "AND"). Then under TRS, the 114 requires facilities to "perform at least three (3) test runs on the cooling tower inlets." In Table 2-1 of the ABC plan, the schedule indicates THC testing only during Run 1 (i.e., # runs are equal to "1"). We want to confirm whether during subsequent runs (i.e., not just Run 1) the ABC plan also includes "performing the THC analysis that is standard with Appendix P to acquire the 7 test runs for THC required by the ICR" during ALL THREE runs? The bulleted list in the ABC plan's Section 2.1 seems to imply this, but to be sure that there is no confusion, we would like a clarification and correction.

Please submit a revised plan with this correction. In Table 2-1, in the row for THC, the number of runs should equal "3".

Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D243-02) 
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711 
Tele:  (919)  541-5251 
Fax  (919)  541-3207