Document ID: EPA_FRDOC_0001-21691
Agency: epa
Document Type: Rule
Title: Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Approvals and Promulgations: New York; Reasonably Available Control Technology for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Posted Date: 2017-12-12T05:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 12, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58342-58347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-26657]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R02-OAR-2017-0459; FRL-9971-83-Region 2]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New York; 
Reasonably Available Control Technology for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone 
National Ambient Air Quality Standards

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is conditionally 
approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of 
New York for purposes of implementing Reasonably Available Control 
Technology (RACT) for the 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air 
Quality Standard (NAAQS) related to control of volatile organic 
compounds (VOCs) from industrial cleaning solvents. The EPA is 
approving New York's Ozone Transport Region RACT SIP as it applies to 
non-control technique guideline major sources of VOCs and major sources 
of oxides of nitrogen. The EPA is also approving the State of New 
York's state-wide non-attainment new source review certification as 
sufficient for purposes of satisfying the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The 
EPA is approving New York's certification that there are no sources 
within the State for the following CTGs: Manufacture of Vegetable Oils 
and Application of Agricultural Pesticides. This action is being taken 
in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act.

DATES: This final rule is effective on January 11, 2018.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under 
Docket ID Number EPA-R02-OAR-2017-0459. All documents in the docket are 
listed on the http://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in 
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as 
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be 
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket 
materials are available electronically through http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony (Ted) Gardella, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007-1866, at 
(212) 637-3892, or by email at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section is 
arranged as follows:

Table of Contents

I. What is the background for this action?
II. What comments were received in response to the EPA's proposed 
action?
III. What action is the EPA taking?
IV. What are the consequences if a condition is not met?
    A. What are the Act's provisions for sanctions?
    B. What Federal implementation plan provisions apply if a state 
fails to submit an approvable plan?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. What is the background for this action?

    On September 14, 2017 (82 FR 43209), the EPA published a Notice of 
Proposed Rulemaking that proposed to conditionally approve the State of 
New York's December 22, 2014 State Implementation Plan (SIP) 
submittal,\1\ for purposes of implementing Reasonably Available Control 
Technology (RACT) \2\ for the 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air 
Quality Standard (NAAQS or standard). The EPA proposed to approve New 
York's Ozone Transport Region RACT SIP as it applies to non-control 
technique guideline major sources of VOCs and major sources of oxides 
of nitrogen. The EPA also proposed to approve the State of New York's 
state-wide non-attainment new source review certification as sufficient 
for purposes of satisfying the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS.\3\ In addition, 
the EPA proposed to approve New York's certification that there are no 
sources within the State for the following CTGs: (a) Manufacture of 
Vegetable Oils and (b) Application of Agricultural Pesticides.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ New York supplemented its SIP submittal by letter dated 
September 6, 2017.
    \2\ The EPA has defined RACT as the lowest emission limitation 
that a particular source is capable of meeting by the application of 
control technology that is reasonably available considering 
technological and economic feasibility (44 FR 53762, September 17, 
1979).
    \3\ New York's nonattainment new source review certification 
addresses both the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-
CT and the Jamestown nonattainment areas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed approval was conditioned on New York finalizing 
revisions to RACT requirements related sources subject to the 
industrial cleaning solvents control techniques guidelines (CTG). As 
the SIP submittal indicates, the RACT requirements for the 2008 ozone 
NAAQS have been fulfilled with the exception of sources subject to the 
industrial cleaning solvents CTG. In the SIP submittal, New York 
committed to address sources subject to this CTG through a timely 
revision to Title 6 of the New York Codes, Rules and Regulations Part 
226 entitled, ``Solvent Metal Cleaning Processes'' (6 NYCRR Part 226). 
Therefore, consistent with section 110(k)(4) of the Clean Air Act 
(CAA), the EPA's September 14, 2017 rulemaking, signed September 6, 
2017 and published September 14, 2017, proposed to conditionally 
approve New York's December 2014 SIP submittal. On September 6, 2017, 
New York supplemented its SIP submittal with a letter to the EPA 
committing to fulfill the requirements of the industrial cleaning 
solvents CTG by finalizing revisions to Part 226 by November 30, 2018. 
Therefore, based on the State's September 6, 2017 commitment letter, 
the EPA is conditionally approving New York's December 2014 SIP 
submittal, as it applies to CTG requirements for VOC major sources, for 
purposes of implementing RACT statewide for the 2008 8-hour ozone 
NAAQS.
    The specific details of New York's December 2014 SIP submittal and 
the rationale for the EPA's approval action are explained in the EPA's 
proposed rulemaking and are not restated in this

[[Page 58343]]

final action. For this detailed information, the reader is referred to 
the EPA's September 14, 2017 proposed rulemaking (82 FR 43209).

II. What comments were received in response to the EPA's proposed 
action?

    In response to the EPA's September 14, 2017 proposed rulemaking on 
New York's December 2014 SIP submittal, the EPA received the following 
four comments summarized below. The specific comments may be viewed 
under Docket ID Number EPA-R02-OAR-2017-0459 on the http://www.regulations.gov Website.
    Comment 1: An anonymous citizen comments that he or she ``believes 
the proposed rule will help improve the environment greatly.''
    Response 1: The EPA acknowledges the commenter's support of the 
EPA's proposed rule.
    Comment 2: A New York State citizen provides extensive comments 
related to the EPA's encouragement (see 82 FR 43209 (September 14, 
2017)) to New York to strengthen its ozone SIP by adopting and 
submitting as a SIP revision additional control measures needed for 
attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS as it relates to: The adoption of 
more stringent emission limits for simple cycle combustion turbines 
firing distillate oil or more than one fuel and submitting a SIP 
revision that addresses HEDD (High Electric Demand Day) sources. The 
citizen states that regional ozone modeling that analyzes emissions 
data from 2015 or 2016 is necessary before New York should consider, 
much less implement, the SIP revisions that EPA ``encourages'' New York 
to adopt and submit as SIP revisions.
    The commenter states that he had prepared comments and analyses 
that support his recommendation to do further modeling before 
implementing any further controls. The commenter states that he had 
compared NOX emissions from all New York sources reporting 
NOX emissions to EPA and all New York combustion turbines 
with ozone concentration measurements at the Fairfield, CT ozone 
monitoring station on all Ozone Season days with valid observations at 
this monitoring station from 2006 to 2016. The commenter states that 
the Fairfield monitoring site is the downwind ambient monitor with the 
highest New York impact according to EPA's modeling for its Cross-State 
Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR). The commenter notes that all combustion 
turbines that meet this criterion are either in New York City or on 
Long Island. The commenter's detailed 52-page modeling and statistical 
summary appears in Attachment 1 to his October 11, 2017 comment letter. 
The commenter's summary concludes that the ``results indicate that 
refined modeling with recent emissions has to be performed to confirm 
that further controls will reduce ozone enough to warrant further 
controls on any of the New York sources included in this analysis.''
    The commenter concludes his letter by stating that there are 
complex meteorological conditions during ozone episodes downwind of New 
York (land and sea breezes, elevated terrain concerns, and the 
nocturnal boundary layer structure along the coast) that need to be 
incorporated into regional ozone modeling analyses. The commenter 
states that if regional ozone modeling analyses that use post-2015 
emissions data and incorporate complex meteorology are not used then 
New York runs the risk of implementing a control program that cannot 
succeed. Concluding, the commenter states, ``Given the level of effort 
and time doing the modeling right it might be necessary to delay 
implementation of further SIP control requirements.''
    Response 2: The EPA thanks the commenter for the detailed analyses 
and recommendations with respect to the additional control measures. 
These comments are not germane to the EPA's proposed approval of New 
York's December 2014 SIP but rather are relevant to future planning 
requirements associated with the moderate area classification. The EPA, 
therefore, is not responding to them in this action. These detailed 
modeling and statistical analyses are best directed to New York State 
as the State develops planning requirements for progressing, under 
moderate area classification, toward attainment of the 8-hour ozone 
standard.
    Comment 3: Similar to Comment 2 above, a comment from the 
Environmental Energy Alliance of New York, LLC (the ``Alliance'') 
provides extensive comments related to the EPA's encouragement (see 82 
FR 43209, September 14, 2017) to New York to strengthen its ozone SIP 
by adopting and submitting as a SIP revision with additional control 
measures needed for attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS as it relates 
to more stringent emission limits on simple cycle turbines units and 
peaking units that operate on high electric demand days (HEDD). 
Alliance members own and operate electric generating and transmission 
and distribution facilities throughout New York and elsewhere. Alliance 
members operate the majority of the peaking units in the New York 
Metropolitan Area (NYMA).
    The Alliance expresses concern that the imposition of emission 
limits needs to be balanced with the need to maintain reliable 
electricity service to New York. While the Alliance supports New York's 
and the EPA's efforts to reach attainment of the ozone NAAQS, the 
Alliance suggests that the need to reduce emissions in the NYMA and the 
Alliance's requirement to maintain reliable service to its customers is 
a more complex issue than simply imposing more stringent emission 
limits. The Alliance comments that there are over 100 peaking turbines 
(about 3000 megawatts (MW)) in the NYMA to maintain system reliability 
and support renewables. The Alliance states that with the impending 
closure of 2000 MW of nuclear generation, the combined effect of the 
peaking unit regulation changes and retirements suggests any new rule 
implementation should proceed with flexibility and caution.
    The Alliance states that it has worked cooperatively with New York 
to develop an approach to replace, repower, or retrofit controls of 
existing peaking units. The Alliance's October 16, 2017 comment letter 
includes as an attachment a September 8, 2017 letter commenting on New 
York's July 25, 2017 pre-proposal entitled ``Combustion Turbine 
(Peaking Unit) Pre-Proposal Outline'' which outlines, according to the 
Alliance, New York's efforts to achieve attainment of the ozone NAAQS 
in the NYMA as it relates to peaking units. In its September 2017 
letter to New York, the Alliance expresses the hope to collectively 
design cost-effective solutions compatible with the need to maintain 
reliable service to ratepayers. In addition, in its September 2017 
letter, the Alliance provides detailed comments and recommendations 
related to the following issues: the compliance schedule, emission 
limits, performance of control options, potential for collateral 
increase in carbon monoxide, system averaging, emission limits for 
dual-fueled units, compliance requirements during the interim period 
before unit retirement, and alternative approaches to NOX 
reductions in the NYMA.
    Response 3: The EPA appreciates the Alliance's comments with 
respect to their concern for electric system reliability within the 
NYMA and the need for caution and flexibility when developing and 
implementing new NOX control measures on peaking units. EPA 
acknowledges the importance of maintaining reliable electric service to

[[Page 58344]]

ratepayers while implementing new NOX controls.
    These extensive and detailed comments concerning the connection 
between reliability of the electric grid and the development and 
implementation of NOX emission limits on electric generating 
units are best directed to New York State as the State engages in 
planning for progressing, under moderate area classification, to 
attainment of the 8-hour ozone standard. These comments relating to the 
reliability of the electric grid are not germane as they do not 
specifically address the EPA's proposed action on New York's December 
2014 SIP submittal that addresses the implementation of RACT for the 8-
hour 2008 ozone standard.
    Comment 4: The State of New Jersey Department of Environmental 
Protection (NJDEP or New Jersey) comments that New York's December 2014 
RACT SIP will provide necessary emission reductions in NOX 
and VOC for the New York-Northern New Jersey-Connecticut (NY-NJ-CT) 
ozone nonattainment area to move towards attainment of the 2008 ozone 
NAAQS (75 ppb ozone), but more still needs to be done for the area to 
attain. NJDEP recommends that the EPA require New York to adequately 
address three source categories that emit significant amounts of 
emissions that impact ozone levels in the NY-NJ-CT area:
    1. Adopt rules that reduce NOX emissions from peaking 
turbines during high ozone days in the NY-NJ-CT area.
    2. Adopt rules that reduce NOX emissions from stationary 
engines used for demand-side management that generate electricity 
during high ozone days in the NY-NJ-CT area.
    3. Assess lightering operations in the New York harbor that emit 
VOC from crude oil, gasoline, and other volatile product transfers.
    As part of the State's October 10, 2017 comment letter, NJDEP 
attached its August 20, 2014 comment letter to New York at the time New 
York proposed its RACT SIP in 2014. NJDEP's August 2014 comment letter 
to New York provides NJDEP's detailed arguments as to why New York 
needs to address the above mentioned three source categories as RACT 
sources. NJDEP states that the first two source categories are subject 
to the New Jersey's RACT regulation but not the third source category 
since there are no lightering operations in New Jersey waters. NJDEP 
comments that New York, in finalizing its 2014 RACT SIP, did not 
adequately address the same three source categories since New York 
responded that the three source categories did not meet their 
definition of RACT. NJDEP comments that it believes these source 
categories should be covered under RACT requirements because they are 
existing, major stationary sources for which reasonably available 
control technology exists. NJDEP comments that the lightering 
activities can be considered a major stationary source, similar to the 
EPA's treatment of some airports for emissions inventory, since the 
activities are occurring within established areas of New York Harbor. 
NJDEP further comments that the State of Delaware has had regulations 
addressing lightering activities since 2007 thus establishing 
reasonably available control technology.
    Response 4: The EPA appreciates the comments from NJDEP. NJDEP 
recommends that New York consider the three source categories 
identified in its comment as RACT but NJDEP does not provide supporting 
technical details to demonstrate that certain control measures for 
these three source categories can be considered RACT in New York.
    As stated in our proposed rule dated September 14, 2017 (82 FR 
43209), New York's December 22, 2014 SIP submittal included a response 
to a comment that ``once the NYMA is reclassified to moderate 
nonattainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS and an attainment SIP is 
required, DEC [New York] will undertake a review of its many 
NOX control options to determine which would most 
efficiently and effectively reduce emissions in the NYMA.'' New York 
made a similar response to a comment related to VOC emissions from 
lightering operations. Since the NYMA was reclassified from a marginal 
to a moderate nonattainment area on May 4, 2016 (81 FR 26697), 
effective June 3, 2016, the following EPA response to NJDEP comments is 
a recommendation that New York include, as part of its upcoming 
attainment demonstration SIP for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the NYMA 
moderate nonattainment area, an evaluation of the NJDEP and the EPA's 
recommended additional control measures for purposes of reducing 
additional NOX and VOC emissions.
    In response to NJDEP's August 2014 letter, New York issued a 
document entitled ``Assessment of Public Comments New York State 
Implementation Plan for 8-hour Ozone: Reasonably Available Control 
Technology'' (Assessment) which is included in the docket for this 
action. In its Assessment, New York responded to the three source 
category comments from NJDEP as summarized below.
    For peaking turbines, New York responded that peaking generating 
units that exceed major source emission threshold are subject to the 
State's NOX RACT regulation for combustion turbines and New 
York maintained that these emission limits represent RACT for 
combustion turbines. New York further responded that the most recently 
adopted and SIP approved (78 FR 41846, July 12, 2013) NOX 
RACT regulation requires case-by-case evaluations for combined-cycle 
combustion turbines. New York further stated that combustion turbines 
are also used as part of a system-wide averaging plan for 
NOX RACT and therefore more stringent limits may not 
necessarily result in a one-for-one reduction in NOX.
    In response to New Jersey's comment, the EPA finds that New York's 
OTR NOX RACT SIP submittal is sufficient. System-wide 
averaging is an EPA approved RACT compliance option.
    The EPA, however, encourages New York to evaluate whether 
NOX emission limits, for the combustion turbines not part of 
a system-wide averaging program, could be more stringent. As stated in 
our September 2017 proposal, the EPA encourages New York to evaluate 
lowering the NOX emission limit for simple cycle combustion 
turbines combusting distillate oil or more than one fuel since New 
York's neighboring states of New Jersey and Connecticut have more 
stringent emission limits than New York's limit of 100 parts per 
million (ppm). For this source category, Connecticut has adopted 
NOX emission limits of 40-75 ppm for June 2018 and 40-75 ppm 
for June 2023 and New Jersey's adopted limit is equivalent to 43 ppm. 
In addition, the EPA encourages New York to propose and submit as a SIP 
revision for the EPA's approval any revised case-by-case RACT 
determinations for combined-cycle combustion turbines.
    For stationary engines used for demand-side management, New York 
responded in its Assessment that the majority of combustion engines 
used for demand-side management are minor sources based on 
NOX emission levels and are therefore not subject to RACT; 
and engines that do exceed major source emission threshold are subject 
to the State's NOX RACT regulation. New York maintained that 
these requirements fulfill RACT.
    In response to New Jersey's comment, the EPA herein responds that 
we concur with New York's logic, as articulated in its Assessment (see 
preceding paragraph) regarding RACT applicability for sources 
considered minor and major. EPA nonetheless encourages New York to 
consider a more stringent NOX emission limit for internal 
combustion engines firing with

[[Page 58345]]

distillate oil (solely or in combination with other fuels) from the 
current limit of 2.3 grams per brake horsepower-hour (g/bhp-hr) to the 
limit adopted in Connecticut of 1.5 (for rich burn engine)-2.3 (for 
lean burn engine) g/bhp-hr, starting in June 2023. In addition, New 
Jersey's SIP approved (72 FR 41626, July 31, 2007) NOX RACT 
regulation, Subchapter 19, includes a NOX emission limit of 
1.5 g/bhp-hr for rich burn engines.
    For lightering operations in the New York harbor, New York, in its 
Assessment, responded that they do not consider tank vessels or service 
vessels to be stationary sources; such vessels are considered mobile 
sources and are not permitted under the Title V stationary source 
permitting program. New York concluded that it is not appropriate to 
address lightering operations in the New York SIP. In response to New 
Jersey's comment, the EPA finds that New York's OTR VOC RACT SIP 
submittal is approvable given New York's current treatment of tank 
vessels and service vessels.
    The EPA recognizes that, as New Jersey indicates in its comment, 
the State of Delaware regulates lightering operations in the State's 
``Regulation No. 1124--Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions 
(formally Regulation No. 24), section 46 entitled, Crude Oil Lightering 
Operations.'' The EPA approved Delaware's VOC RACT Regulation 1124, 
section 46, Crude Oil Lightering Operations, into the SIP on September 
13, 2007 (72 FR 52285). As discussed above, in response to a comment 
received by the State during its RACT rulemaking process, New York 
states that, if the NYMA is reclassified to moderate nonattainment, 
``New York will investigate the need and appropriateness for additional 
emission reductions and evaluate lightering controls and/or other 
emission reductions strategies in order to determine the most effective 
manner in which to attain the ozone NAAQS.'' Therefore, the EPA 
recommends that New York review the lightering operations in New York's 
harbor for possible applicability to RACT as it relates to New York's 
future submittal of its attainment SIP for the NYMA nonattainment area.
    To summarize, since the NYMA has been reclassified from marginal to 
a moderate nonattainment area, New York is required to submit a new 
RACT determination as part of the State's attainment demonstration for 
the 2008 ozone standard for the NYMA moderate nonattainment area. New 
York should include an evaluation of the three source categories 
suggested by NJDEP, as well as the other recommendations discussed by 
the EPA as in the September 14, 2017 proposal, in its RACT evaluation 
as part of the State's attainment demonstration for the 2008 ozone 
standard.

III. What action is the EPA taking?

    The EPA is conditionally approving New York's statewide RACT 
submittal dated December 22, 2014, as supplemented on September 6, 
2017, for purposes of satisfying the 2008 8-hour ozone standard RACT 
requirement, as it applies to CTG requirements for VOC major sources. 
New York must meet its commitment to adopt a revised Part 226 by 
November 30, 2018.
    The EPA is approving the remainder of New York's OTR RACT SIP 
submittal, as it applies to non-CTG major sources of VOCs and to major 
sources of NOX.
    The EPA is also approving New York's non-attainment new source 
review certification, state-wide, as sufficient for purposes of the 
2008 ozone NAAQS. Finally, the EPA is approving New York's 
certification that there are no sources within the State for the 
following CTGs: (a) Manufacture of Vegetable Oils and (b) Application 
of Agricultural Pesticides.
    Under section 110(k) of the CAA, the EPA may conditionally approve 
a plan revision based on a commitment by the State to adopt specific 
enforceable measures by a date certain but not later than one year 
after the date of approval of the plan revision. If New York meets its 
commitment within the applicable time frame, the conditionally approved 
submission will remain as part of the SIP until the EPA takes final 
action approving or disapproving the SIP requirement in question. If 
New York fails to meet its commitment within the specified time period, 
the conditional approval will, by operation of law, become a 
disapproval. If the conditional approval becomes a disapproval, this 
commitment will no longer be a part of the approved SIP for New York, 
and an 18-month clock for sanctions under CAA section 179(a)(2) and a 
two-year clock for a federal implementation plan (FIP) under CAA 
section 110(c)(1) would commence. The EPA subsequently will publish a 
document in the Federal Register notifying the public that the 
conditional approval converted to a disapproval.

IV. What are the consequences if the condition is not met?

    The Act provides for the imposition of sanctions and the 
promulgation of a FIP if States fail to correct any deficiencies 
identified by the EPA in a final disapproval action within certain 
timeframes.

A. What are the Act's provisions for sanctions?

    If the EPA disapproves a required SIP submittal or component of a 
SIP submittal, section 179(a) provides for the imposition of sanctions 
unless the deficiency is corrected within 18 months of the final 
disapproval. The first sanction would apply 18 months after the EPA 
disapproves the SIP submittal or if the State fails to make the 
required submittal. Under the EPA's sanctions regulations, 40 CFR 
52.31, the first sanction would be 2:1 offsets for sources subject to 
the new source review requirements under section 173 of the Act. If the 
State has still failed to submit a SIP 6 months after the first 
sanction is imposed, the second sanction will apply. The second 
sanction is a limitation on the receipt of Federal highway funds. The 
EPA also has authority under section 110(m) to sanction a broader area.

B. What Federal implementation plan provisions apply if a state fails 
to submit an approvable plan?

    In addition to sanctions, if the EPA finds that a State failed to 
submit the required SIP revision or disapproves the required SIP 
revision, or a portion thereof, the EPA must promulgate a FIP no later 
than 2 years from the date of the finding if the deficiency has not 
been corrected.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a 
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and 
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under 
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions

[[Page 58346]]

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has 
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose 
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as 
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by February 12, 2018. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of 
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for 
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness 
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in 
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: November 29, 2017.
Peter D. Lopez,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.

    Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart HH--New York

0
2. In Sec.  52.1670, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding 
the entries ``2008 8-hour Ozone RACT analysis'' and ``2008 8-hour Ozone 
Nonattainment New Source Review Requirements'' at the end of the table 
to read as follows:

Sec.  52.1670  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

                       EPA-Approved New York Nonregulatory and Quasi-Regulatory Provision
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             New York
       Action/SIP element         Applicable geographic      submittal     EPA  approval        Explanation
                                  or  nonattainment area       date            date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
2008 8-hour Ozone RACT analysis  Statewide and to the           12/22/14        12/12/17   Full approval
                                  New York portion of                                      as it applies to non-
                                  the New York-Northern                                    CTG major sources of
                                  New Jersey-Long Island                                   VOCs and to major
                                  (NY-NJ-CT) and the                                       sources of NOX.
                                  Jamestown 8-hour ozone                                   Conditional
                                  nonattainment areas.                                     approval as it
                                                                                           applies to CTG for
                                                                                           VOC major sources.
2008 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment  Statewide and to the           12/22/14        12/12/17   Full
 New Source Review Requirements.  New York portion of                                      approval.
                                  the New York-Northern
                                  New Jersey-Long Island
                                  (NY-NJ-CT) and the
                                  Jamestown 8-hour ozone
                                  nonattainment areas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0
3. Amend Sec.  52.1683 by adding paragraphs (b)(2) and (3) and (p) to 
read as follows:

Sec.  52.1683  Control strategy: Ozone.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (2) Manufacture of Vegetable Oils.
    (3) Application of Agricultural Pesticides.
* * * * *
    (p)(1) The December 22, 2014 New York reasonably available control 
technology (RACT) analysis plan, as supplemented on September 6, 2017, 
submitted pursuant to the 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air 
quality standard (NAAQS), which applies to the entire State, including 
the New York portion of the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island 
(NY-NJ-CT) and the Jamestown 8-hour ozone marginal nonattainment areas, 
is conditionally approved as it applies to the Clean Air Act control 
techniques guidelines (CTG)

[[Page 58347]]

requirements for major sources of volatile organic compounds (VOC).
    (2) The remainder of New York's December 22, 2014 RACT analysis 
plan, pursuant to the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS as applied to the entire 
State, including the New York portion of the NY-NJ-CT and the Jamestown 
8-hour ozone marginal nonattainment areas, and as it applies to non-CTG 
major sources of VOCs and to major sources of oxides of nitrogen 
(NOX), is approved.
    (3) The December 22, 2014 New York plan submittal providing a 
nonattainment new source review (NNSR) certification as sufficient for 
purposes of the state-wide 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, including the New 
York portion of the NY-NJ-CT and the Jamestown 8-hour ozone 
nonattainment areas, is approved.

[FR Doc. 2017-26657 Filed 12-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P