Document ID: EPA-R06-OAR-2020-0343-0001
Agency: epa
Document Type: Proposed Rule
Title: TX230.01 Air Quality State Implementation Plans, Approvals and Promulgations: Texas; Clean Air Act Requirements for Enhanced Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance and Nonattainment New Source Review, Proposed rule, 3 pages.
Posted Date: 2021-03-01T05:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 38 (Monday, March 1, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11913-11915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02758]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2020-0343; FRL-10016-31-Region 6]

Air Plan Approval; Texas; Clean Air Act Requirements for Enhanced 
Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance and Nonattainment New Source Review

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act), the 
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve portions 
of two State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State 
of Texas for the 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality 
Standard (NAAQS). The SIP revisions proposed for approval describe how 
CAA requirements for vehicle Inspection and Maintenance (I/M) and 
Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR) are met in the Dallas-Fort Worth 
(DFW) and Houston-Galveston-Brazoria (HGB) serious ozone nonattainment 
areas.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before March 31, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-
2020-0343, at https://www.regulations.gov or via email to 
paige.carrie@epa.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting 
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from 
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public 
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, 
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written 
comment is considered the official comment and should include 
discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not 
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary 
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For 
additional submission methods, please contact Carrie Paige, 214-665-
6521, paige.carrie@epa.gov. For the full EPA public comment policy, 
information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance 
on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
    Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available 
electronically at www.regulations.gov. While all documents in the 
docket are listed in the index, some information may not be publicly 
available due to docket file size restrictions or content (e.g., CBI).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carrie Paige, EPA Region 6 Office, 
Infrastructure and Ozone Section, 214-665-6521, paige.carrie@epa.gov. 
Out of an abundance of caution for members of the public and our staff, 
the EPA Region 6 office may be closed to the public to reduce the risk 
of transmitting COVID-19. We encourage the public to submit comments 
via https://www.regulations.gov, as there will be a delay in processing 
mail and no courier or hand deliveries will be accepted. Please call or 
email the contact listed above if you need alternative access to 
material indexed but not provided in the docket.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,'' 
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.

I. Background

    On March 12, 2008, the EPA revised both the primary and secondary 
NAAQS for ozone to a level of 0.075 parts per million (ppm) to provide 
increased protection of public health and the environment (73 FR 16436, 
March 27, 2008).\1\ The 2008 ozone NAAQS retains the same general form 
and averaging time as the 0.08 ppm NAAQS set in 1997 but is set at a 
more protective level. Specifically, the 2008 ozone NAAQS is attained 
when the 3-year average of the annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8-
hour average ambient air quality ozone concentrations is less

[[Page 11914]]

than or equal to 0.075 ppm. See 40 CFR 50.15.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ For a history of the ozone NAAQS, please visit https://www.epa.gov/ground-level-ozone-pollution/table-historical-ozone-national-ambient-air-quality-standards-naaqs. For information on 
EPA's periodic review of the ozone NAAQS, please visit https://www.epa.gov/naaqs/ozone-o3-air-quality-standards.
    \2\ The current NAAQS for ozone is an 8-hour standard of 0.070 
ppm, finalized in 2015 (October 26, 2015, 80 FR 65292). This action 
does not address the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Both the DFW and HGB areas were designated as nonattainment for the 
2008 ozone NAAQS (77 FR 30088, May 21, 2012). The DFW area consists of 
Collin, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Johnson, Kaufman, Parker, Rockwall, 
Tarrant and Wise counties. The HGB area consists of Brazoria, Chambers, 
Fort Bend, Galveston, Harris, Liberty, Montgomery and Waller counties.
    On December 23, 2014, the D.C. Circuit Court issued a decision 
rejecting, among other things, our attainment deadlines for the 2008 
ozone nonattainment areas, finding that we did not have statutory 
authority under the CAA to extend those deadlines to the end of the 
calendar year. NRDC v. EPA, 777 F.3d 456, 464-69 (D.C. Cir. 2014). 
Consistent with the court's decision we modified the attainment 
deadlines for all nonattainment areas for the 2008 ozone NAAQS, and set 
the attainment deadline for all 2008 moderate ozone nonattainment 
areas, including the DFW area as July 20, 2018, and the HGB area 
(initially classified as marginal) as July 20, 2015 (80 FR 12264, March 
6, 2015). The HGB area qualified for a 1-year extension of the 
attainment deadline and we revised the attainment deadline to July 20, 
2016 (81 FR 26697, May 4, 2016). The HGB area did not meet the revised 
attainment deadline of July 20, 2016, and we reclassified the area to 
moderate (81 FR 90207, December 14, 2016). The DFW and HGB areas did 
not meet the moderate area attainment deadline and were accordingly 
reclassified as serious (84 FR 44238, August 23, 2019).\3\ Section 182 
of the CAA outlines SIP requirements applicable to ozone nonattainment 
areas in each classification category. The serious area classification 
triggers additional requirements, including NNSR and enhanced vehicle 
I/M. See CAA section 182(c) and 40 CFR 51.350.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The attainment deadline for a serious area classification is 
9 years after the initial designation as nonattainment, which in 
this case is July 20, 2021. See 40 CFR 51.1103 and 84 FR 44238.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On May 13, 2020, the Texas Commission on Environment Quality (TCEQ 
or State) submitted to EPA a SIP revision for each of the DFW and HGB 
serious ozone nonattainment areas. In those SIP revisions, the State 
describes how the DFW and HGB areas meet the enhanced vehicle I/M 
program and NNSR requirements for serious ozone nonattainment areas 
using existing measures already approved into the SIP. These two SIP 
revisions are available in the docket for this action, at 
www.regulations.gov, docket number EPA-R06-OAR-2020-0343.

II. The TCEQ Submittals and EPA's Evaluation

    The two Texas SIP revisions include a statement certifying that the 
DFW and HGB areas meet the serious area requirements for enhanced I/M 
and nonattainment NSR for the 2008 eight-hour ozone NAAQS. In addition, 
the SIP revisions provide a brief history of the enhanced I/M and NNSR 
programs in the Texas SIP. The SIP revisions also state that, (1) the 
vehicle I/M program in the DFW and HGB ozone nonattainment areas meet 
the federal requirements for areas classified as serious or above; and 
(2) because the Texas SIP includes nonattainment NSR requirements, the 
requirements for nonattainment NSR are met for the DFW and HGB serious 
ozone nonattainment areas.

Enhanced Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance

    Section 182(c)(3) of the CAA requires states with ozone 
nonattainment areas classified as serious or worse to implement an 
enhanced program to reduce hydrocarbon emissions and nitrogen oxides 
(NOX) \4\ emissions from in-use motor vehicles registered in 
each urbanized area in the nonattainment area. The Federal rules 
addressing I/M program requirements are provided at 40 CFR part 51, 
subpart S and further defined at 40 CFR 51.350 (Applicability). Under 
these requirements, serious ozone nonattainment areas in urbanized 
areas with 1980 Census-defined urbanized populations of 200,000 or more 
are required to adopt enhanced I/M programs (40 CFR 51.350(a)(2) and 
(4)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ NOX and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) are 
precursors to ozone formation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Texas SIP includes 30 TAC Section 114.2 (Inspection and 
Maintenance Definitions) and 30 TAC Section 114.50 (Vehicle Emissions 
Inspection Requirements) except for 30 TAC Section 114.50(b)(2).\5\ 
Under these provisions Brazoria, Fort Bend, Galveston, Harris, and 
Montgomery counties in the HGB area are included in the I/M program, 
and Collin, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Johnson, Kaufman, Parker, Rockwall, 
and Tarrant counties in the DFW area are included in the I/M program. 
The program requires that gasoline powered light-duty vehicles, and 
light and heavy-duty trucks between two and twenty-four years old, that 
are registered or required to be registered in the I/M program area, 
including fleets, are subject to annual inspection and testing. These 
programs were adopted and approved as meeting the applicable 
requirements of the I/M rules in response to the area designations 
under the one-hour ozone standard and later the 1997 8-hour standard. 
The size of the HGB nonattainment area did not change with the 
implementation of the 2008 ozone standard. As a result, EPA's previous 
finding that the program covers the necessary vehicle population is 
still appropriate. See 70 FR 58119, 58132 (October 5, 2005) and 71 FR 
52670 (September 6, 2006). Wise County was added to the DFW 
nonattainment area under the 2008 standard. Wise County, however, is 
not required to be included in the I/M program as the current I/M 
program in the DFW area sufficiently covers a non-urbanized area 
population greater than the urbanized area in Wise County. To verify, 
we evaluate the extent of area coverage for I/M, as defined at 40 CFR 
51.350(b)(2): ``Outside of ozone transport regions, programs shall 
nominally cover at least the entire urbanized area, based on the 1990 
census.\6\ Exclusion of some urban population is allowed as long as an 
equal number of non-urban residents of the MSA containing the subject 
urbanized area are included to compensate for the exclusion.'' Based on 
the 1990 census, the urban population of the DFW area covered by the I/
M program (which consisted of 9 counties: Collin, Dallas, Denton, 
Ellis, Johnson, Kaufman, Parker, Rockwall and Tarrant) was 3,198,259 
and the urban population of Wise County was 8,735. Thus, the population 
of the entire urbanized area was 3,206,994 (3,198,259 + 8,735). The 
urban and non-urban population of the 9-county DFW area was 3,885,415. 
By subtracting the population of the entire urbanized area (3,206,994) 
from the urban and non-urban populations of the 9-county DFW I/M area 
(3,885,415-3,206,994 = 678,421), more than an equal number of non-urban 
residents in the 9-county DFW area are included in the I/M

[[Page 11915]]

program to compensate for the exclusion of the urbanized population of 
8,735 in Wise County.\7\ Thus, Wise County need not implement an I/M 
program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ We did not approve 30 TAC Section 114.50(b)(2) as part of 
the Texas SIP as (1) it placed an additional reporting burden upon 
commanders at Federal facilities regarding affected Federal vehicles 
that is not imposed upon any other affected non-federal vehicle; and 
(2) the additional reporting requirement is not an essential element 
for an approvable I/M program, since affected Federal vehicles are 
also subject to the same reporting requirements as other affected 
non-federal vehicles. See 66 FR 57261, 57262 (November 14, 2001).
    \6\ Texas is not included in the Ozone Transport Region (OTR), 
which is defined at CAA section 184(a).
    \7\ All population data in this paragraph are from the 1990 
Census. The 1990 Census report for Texas is in the docket for this 
rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Therefore, since the provisions in the Texas SIP already include 
the I/M requirements specified by the CAA for serious ozone 
nonattainment areas, we are proposing to approve this portion of the 
two SIP revisions.

Nonattainment NSR

    The applicable NNSR requirements for the various ozone 
nonattainment classifications are described in CAA section 182 and 
further defined in 40 CFR part 51, subpart I (Review of New Sources and 
Modifications). Under these requirements new major sources or major 
modifications at existing sources in an ozone nonattainment area must 
comply with the lowest achievable emission rate and obtain sufficient 
emission offsets.\8\ For serious ozone nonattainment areas, major 
sources are defined as any stationary source or group of sources 
located within a contiguous area and under common control that emits, 
or has the potential to emit, at least 50 tons per year (tpy) of 
NOX or VOC (see CAA sections 182(c) and 182(f), and 40 CFR 
51.165). The emission offset ratio required for serious ozone 
nonattainment areas is 1.2 to 1 (see CAA section 182(c)(10).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Offsets are the ratio of total emissions reductions of 
NOX or VOC to the emissions increase of such air 
pollutant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The EPA-approved Texas SIP already includes 30 TAC Section 116.12 
(Nonattainment and Prevention of Significant Deterioration Review 
Definitions) and 30 TAC Section 116.150 (New Major Source or Major 
Modification in Ozone Nonattainment Area).\9\ These provisions require 
new major sources or major modifications at existing sources in the DFW 
and HGB areas to comply with the lowest achievable emission rate and 
obtain emission offsets at the serious classification ratio of 1.2 to 
1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See 60 FR 49781, September 27, 1995 and subsequent revisions 
at 77 FR 65119, October 25, 2012 and 79 FR 66626, November 10, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Therefore, since the provisions in the Texas SIP already include 
the NNSR requirements specified by the CAA for serious ozone 
nonattainment areas, we are proposing to approve this portion of the 
two SIP revisions.

III. Proposed Action

    We are proposing to approve portions of two revisions to the Texas 
SIP submitted on May 13, 2020, that describe how CAA requirements for 
vehicle I/M and NNSR are met in the DFW and HGB serious ozone 
nonattainment areas for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 
2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has 
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 
country, the proposed rule does not have tribal implications and will 
not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt 
tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 
9, 2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: February 5, 2021.
David Gray,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2021-02758 Filed 2-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P