Document ID: NHTSA-2021-0034-0002
Agency: nhtsa
Document Type: Notice
Title: Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance: Toyo Tire Holdings of Americas, Inc.
Posted Date: 2022-05-19T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 97 (Thursday, May 19, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30556-30557]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10770]

[[Page 30556]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2021-0034; Notice 1]

Toyo Tire Holdings of Americas Inc., Receipt of Petition for 
Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Receipt of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Toyo Tire Holdings of Americas, Inc., (Toyo) has determined 
that certain Open Country R/T light truck tires, do not fully comply 
with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 119, New 
Pneumatic Tires for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of More Than 4,536 
Kilograms (10,000 Pounds) and Motorcycles. Toyo filed a noncompliance 
report dated March 15, 2021, and later amended it on April 2, 2021. 
Toyo simultaneously petitioned NHTSA on April 2, 2021, for a decision 
that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to 
motor vehicle safety. This notice announces receipt of Toyo's petition.

DATES: Send comments on or before June 21, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data, 
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the 
docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and 
submitted by any of the following methods:
     Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to the U.S. 
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building 
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 
20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver comments by hand to the U.S. 
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building 
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 
20590. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. 
except for Federal holidays.
     Electronically: Submit comments electronically by logging 
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) website at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting 
comments.
     Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
    Comments must be written in the English language and be no greater 
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of 
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in 
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish 
to receive confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were 
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the 
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change 
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information 
provided.
    All comments and supporting materials received before the close of 
business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the 
docket and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials 
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be 
considered to the fullest extent possible.
    When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will 
also be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority 
indicated at the end of this notice.
    All comments, background documentation, and supporting materials 
submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and 
times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the internet at 
https://www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for 
accessing the docket. The docket ID number for this petition is shown 
in the heading of this notice.
    DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a 
Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jayton Lindley, General Engineer, 
NHTSA, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, (325) 655-0547.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Overview

    Toyo has determined that certain Toyo Open Country R/T light truck 
tires, do not fully comply with paragraph S6.5(j) of FMVSS No. 119, New 
Pneumatic Tires for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of More Than 4,536 
Kilograms (10,000 Pounds) and Motorcycles (49 CFR 571.119). Toyo filed 
a noncompliance report dated March 15, 2021, and later amended it on 
April 2, 2021, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance 
Responsibility and Reports. Toyo simultaneously petitioned NHTSA on 
April 2, 2021, for an exemption from the notification and remedy 
requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this 
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety, 
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556, 
Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or Noncompliance.
    This notice of receipt of Toyo's petition is published under 49 
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any Agency decision or 
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.

II. Tires Involved

    Approximately 518 Toyo Open Country R/T light truck tires, size 
35X12.50R20LT 125Q, manufactured between January 29, 2021, and March 8, 
2021, are potentially involved.

III. Noncompliance

    Toyo explains that the noncompliance was due to a mold error in 
which the sidewall with the partial TIN incorrectly states the load 
range as required by paragraph S6.5(j) of FMVSS No. 119. Specifically, 
the tires were marked: LOAD RANGE E when they should have been marked: 
LOAD RANGE F.

IV. Rule Requirements

    Paragraph S6.5(j) of FMVSS No. 119 includes the requirements 
relevant to this petition. The subject tires are required to be marked 
on each sidewall with the letter designating the tire load range.

V. Summary of Toyo's Petition

    The following views and arguments presented in this section, ``V. 
Summary of Toyo's Petition,'' are the views and arguments provided by 
Toyo. They have not been evaluated by the Agency and do not reflect the 
views of the Agency. Toyo describes the subject noncompliance and 
contends that the noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to 
motor vehicle safety. In support of its petition, Toyo submitted the 
following reasoning:
    During production, the plate containing the load range letter was 
not changed on the sidewall containing the partial TIN when production 
was converted from the load range ``E'' tire to the load range ``F'' 
tire.
    Toyo stated that the affected tire mold was immediately corrected 
after this issue was discovered and all future production will have the 
correct load range letter.
    For the 35X12.50R20LT tire size, Load Range E tires have a maximum 
load carrying capacity of 1,450 kg (3,195 lbs.) at 450 kPa (65 PSI); 
Load Range F tires have a maximum load carrying capacity of 1,650 kg 
(3,640 lbs.) at 550 kPa (80 PSI). Thus, even if a consumer were to rely 
on the incorrect load range designation on the non-serial sidewall,

[[Page 30557]]

there would be no associated risk of overloading.
    Toyo says that NHTSA has previously granted inconsequentiality 
petitions for similar FMVSS noncompliances and cited sections from the 
following previous petitions that NHTSA had been granted:
     Guizhou Tyre Corporation; Grant of Petition for Decision 
of Inconsequential Noncompliance. 78 FR 12828, February 25, 2013.
     Yokohama Tire Corporation, Grant of Petition for Decision 
of Inconsequential Noncompliance. 84 FR. 64403, November 21, 2019.
     Tireco, Inc., Ruling on Petition for Decision of 
Inconsequential Noncompliance. 81 FR 58550, August 25, 2016.
    Toyo says that the subject tires meet all other performance and 
regulatory requirements of FMVSS No. 119. Further, Toyo also says that 
they have not received any complaints, claims, or warranty adjustments 
related to this noncompliance.
    Toyo concludes that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as 
it relates to motor vehicle safety as these tires have a higher load 
carrying capacity than the incorrect marking indicates, therefore, the 
marking will not cause an operator to overload the tires. Thus, Toyo 
believes that its petition to be exempted from providing notification 
of the noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for 
the noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
    NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a 
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers 
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively, 
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance 
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on 
this petition only applies to the subject equipment that Toyo no longer 
controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed. 
However, any decision on this petition does not relieve equipment 
distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for 
sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate 
commerce of the noncompliant tires under their control after Toyo 
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.

(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at 49 
CFR 1.95 and 501.8)

Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2022-10770 Filed 5-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P