Document ID: EPA-R03-OAR-2009-0876-0004
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2010-12-17T05:00Z

SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST

	(In accordance with 40 CFR Part 51 - App. V)

   SIP Submitted by:  West Virginia Department of Environmental
Protection

     Date Submitted:   July 20, 1999

            Subject:  45 CSR 14 – PSD regulations (NOx as precursor)

Completeness Review 

Completed by:  Sharon McCauley	

     Date Completed:   May 13, 2010

Administrative Materials

	ACCEPTABLE

	EPA REQUIREMENT	

	STATE SUBMITTAL 	

(X)

1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee,
requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision thereof.	

1.   Letter of Submission from Cabinet Secretary dated July 20, 2009	X

2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or
body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, or consent agreement
in final form.  That evidence shall include the date of adoption or
final issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if different
from the adoption/issuance date.

Check to see if the regulation, permit, order or consent decree has a
sunset or expiration date.  If so it is not acceptable as a SIP
submission.  	

2.  Rule was passed on April 30, 2009 by Senate Bill 153 and became
effective on June 1, 2009	X

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under State
law to adopt and implement the plan.	

3.  WV Register notices are enclosed	X

4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and
incorporation by reference into the plan, including indication of the
changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable.  The
submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation/document
signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate State official indicating that
it is fully enforceable by the State.  The effective date of the
regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the
document itself.	

4.  Copy of Regulation enclosed	

X

 

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements
of the State's laws and constitution in conducting and completing the
adoption/issuance of the plan.	

5.  Evidence is provided in SIP package	X

6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change
consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including the date of
publication of such notice.	

6.  Public notice information included	X

7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance with the
information provided in the public notice and the State's laws and
constitution, if applicable.	

7.  Public hearing notification enclosed	X

8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response thereto.	

8.  Comments were provided in SIP package	

 X

                                                                        
              Technical Materials

	

1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan.	

1.   PSD sources are identified in the plan package	X

2. Identification of the locations of affected sources including the EPA
attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of
the attainment plan for the affected area(s).	

2.  PSD sources identified	X

3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from the
affected sources; estimates of changes in current actual emissions from
affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in
actual emissions from affected sources through calculations of the
differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions
anticipated as a result of the revision.	

3.  N/A	

 

4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality
standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments,
reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility, as
applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented. 	

4.  PSD sources are identified.	

X

5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision,
including input data, output data, models used,  ambient monitoring data
used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data
(where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information
relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis.	

5.  N/A	

6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are based on
continuous emission reduction technology.	

6  N/A	

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practice
standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary, to
ensure emission levels.	

7.  N/A	

8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how compliance will be
determined in practice.	

8  N/A	

9. Special economic and technological justifications required by any
applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate, explain why.)	

9.  N/A	

10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a maintenance plan
demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 years
after redesignation.	

10.  N/A