Document ID: EPA-HQ-OECA-2004-0019-0008
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2004-12-10T05:00Z

Table
1.
Annual
Agency
Burden
and
Cost
of
Recordkeeping
and
Reporting
Requirements
of
the
NESHAP
for
the
Pulp
and
Paper
Production
Source
Category
­­
Process
Operations
#
pulping
lines
(
A)
(
B)
(
C)
(
D)
(
E)
(
F)

#
bleaching
lines
Number
of
EPA
Tech
Managemen
t
Clerical
EPA
#
mills
total
Responden
ts
Hours
Hours
Hours
Hours
Cost
#
mills
with
bleaching
lines
Per
Year
(
a)
Per
Per
Year
Per
Year
Per
Year
Per
Year
Responden
t
@
$
28.08
@
$
51.95
@
$
20.85
Burden
Item
(
C=
AxB)
(
D=
Cx0.05)
(
E=
Cx0.1)

1.
Applications
2.
Surveys
and
Studies
3.
Reporting
Requirements
A.
Read
and
Understand
Rule
Requirements
1
b
40
40
2
4
$
1,310
B.
Required
Activities
Initial
performance
tests:

1.1)
Pulping
processes
(
Non­
Sulfite)
­
Choice
of:

a)
Review
Documentation
that
vent
streams
are
introduced
to
5
bc
8
40
2
4
$
1,310
the
flame
zone
of
a
boiler,
lime
kiln,
or
recovery
furnace,
or
b)
Review
documentation
that
the
control
incinerator
is
operating
1
b
d
8
8
0
1
$
262
at
a
level
of
at
least
1600
F
and
0.75
sec
residence
time,
or
c)
Review
performance
test
of
control
device
1
b
d
8
8
0
1
$
262
1.2)
Pulping
Processes
(
Sulfite)
1
be
8
8
0
1
$
262
­
Revew
performance
test
of
control
device
2.1)
Bleaching
process
vent
scrubber
(
MACT
I
Mills)
­
Choice
of
a)
Review
documentation
of
scrubber
operating
parameters
4
bg
8
32
2
3
$
1,048
b)
Review
performance
test
of
control
device
0
bf
8
0
0
0
$
0
2.2)
Bleaching
process
vent
scrubber
(
MACT
III
Mills)
­
Choice
of
a)
Review
documentation
of
scrubber
operating
parameters
0
bg
8
0
0
0
$
0
b)
Review
performance
test
of
control
device
0
bf
8
0
1
0
$
52
3.1)
Pulping
wastewater
treatment
system
(
Non­
Sulfite)
­
Choice
of:

a)
Review
performance
test
of
condensate
segregation
and
4
bg
8
32
2
3
$
1,048
control
device,
or
b)
Review
performance
test
of
biotreatment
unit
40
bg
8
320
16
32
$
10,484
3.2)
Pulping
wastewater
treatment
(
Sulfite)

­
Review
performance
test
of
control
device
1
bg
h
8
8
0
1
$
262
Review
repeat
performance
tests
1)
test
method
308
­
pulping
0
bi
4
0
0
0
$
0
2)
test
method
26A
­
bleaching
0
bi
4
0
1
1
$
73
3)
test
method
305
­
kraft
pulping
wastewater
1
bi
4
4
0
0
$
131
4)
test
method
304
­
kraft
pulping
wastewater
0
bi
4
0
0
0
$
0
5)
test
method
305
­
sulfite
pulping
wastewater
0
bi
4
0
1
0
$
52
Initial/
Annual
inspection
(
enclosures,
closed
vent,
103
j
0
0
0
0
$
0
wastewater
conveyance
system)­
test
method
21
Monthly
visual
inspection
of
enclosures,
closed
155
k
0
0
0
0
$
0
vent
system,
and
wastewater
conveyance
system.

Table
1
(
continued).
Annual
Agency
Burden
and
Cost
of
Recordkeeping
and
Reporting
Requirements
of
the
NESHAP
for
the
Pulp
and
Paper
Production
Source
Category
­­
Process
Operations
#
pulping
lines
(
A)
(
B)
(
C)
(
D)
(
E)
(
F)
#
bleaching
lines
Number
of
EPA
Technica
l
Managemen
t
Clerical
EPA
#
mills
total
Responden
ts
Hours
Hours
Hours
Hours
Cost
#
mills
with
bleaching
lines
Per
Year
(
a)
Per
Per
Year
Per
Year
Per
Year
Per
Year
Responden
t
@$
28.08
@
$
51.95
@
$
20.85
Burden
Item
(
r)
(
C=
AxB)
(
D=
Cx0.05)
(
E=
Cx0.1)
(
s)

C.
Create
Information
D.
Gather
Information
E.
Report
Preparation
Review
Initial
Notification
Report
0
bk
4
0
0
0
$
0
Review
Notification
of
compliance
status
0
bk
4
0
0
0
$
0
Review
initial
compliance
strategy
report
0
bl
4
0
0
0
$
0
Review
compliance
strategy
report
update
31
l
4
124
6
12
$
4,063
Review
Semi­
annual
summary
report
162
k
2
324
16
32
$
10,615
Review
Continuous
monitoring/
Exceedance
reports
24
m
8
192
10
19
$
6,290
Review
Notification
of
performance
test
28
b
n
8
224
11
22
$
7,339
Review
Notification
of
construction/
reconstruction
23
b
o
4
92
5
9
$
3,014
Review
Notification
of
anticipated
startup
23
b
o
4
92
1
1
$
2,656
Review
Notification
of
actual
startup
23
b
o
4
92
1
1
$
2,656
4.
Recordkeeping
Requirements
A.
Read
Instructions
B.
Plan
Activities
C.
Implement
Activities
D.
Develop
Record
System
0
bk
0
0
0
0
$
0
E.
Record
information
Records
of
monitoring
parameters
162
c
0
0
0
0
$
0
Records
of
periodic
inspections
(
monthly
visual
inspections
and
annual
method
21)

Record
startups,
shutdowns,
and
malfunctions
162
c
0
0
0
0
$
0
F.
Personnel
Training
G.
Time
for
audits
H.
Litgation
p
4160
208
416
$
136,292
Total:
194
1640
130
170
$
189,483
TOTAL
FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT
BURDEN
SUMMARY:

Total
Hours:
1,939
Total
Cost:
$
189,483
Average
Annual
Hours:
646
Average
Annual
Cost:
$
63,161
a
Values
are
rounded
to
simplify
calculations.

b
One­
time
activity.
In
out
years,
after
initial
compliance
date,
assume
that
5%
of
mills
affected
as
a
result
of
unexplained
exceedances.

c
Estimated
that
66.7%
of
mills
will
use
a
recovery
boiler,
power
boiler,
or
lime
kiln
for
pulping
lines.
There
are
141
non­
sulfite
pulping
mills.
(
66.7%
of
141
=
94)

d
Estimated
that
33.3%
of
mills
will
use
incineration
for
pulping
lines
(
16.7%
will
provide
accepatble
design
specs
(
24),
and
16.7%
will
conduct
performance
tests
(
24)
)

e
Assume
that
5%
of
the
14
sulfite
pulping
mills
will
conduct
performance
tests
(
14
x
.05
=
.7
(
rounded
to
1)).
f
87
MACT
I
category
mills
have
bleaching
lines.
90%
will
provide
acceptable
performance
specs
(
78),
10%
will
conduct
performance
tests
(
9)

Assume
2
percent
of
stand­
alone
MACT
III
category
mills
have
bleaching
lines
(
2%
of
338=
7).
90%
will
provide
performance
specs
of
previous
test
results
(
6)

10%
will
conduct
performance
tests
(
1).

g
Estimated
that
each
kraft
mill
has
one
pulping
wastewater
control
device.
Of
the
123
kraft
mills,
32
already
have
steam
strippers
in
use,

and
of
the
32,
16
assumed
to
test,
16
assumed
to
provide
performance
specs.
Of
the
91
mills
without
control,
40
will
use
biotreatment
control,
and
51
will
install
steam
strippers.

Facilities
installing
new
biotreatment
control
or
new
steam
strippers
are
assumed
to
perform
initial
performance
tests.

h
Estimated
that
each
kraft
mill
has
one
pulping
wastewater
control
device.
Assumed
33%
will
use
biotreatment.
(
33%
of
123
=
40)

i
Assumed
that
15%
of
performance
tests
are
failed
and
need
to
be
repeated.

j
Initial
and
annual
activity
by
all
affected
mills.
Assumed
that
EPA
is
notified
each
year
of
the
testing.
Assumed
2/
3
of
all
MACT
I
mills
have
positive
pressure
points
in
their
vent
systems(
2/
3
x
155=
103).

k
Performed
by
all
affected
mills.
(
162)

l
Performed
by
all
kraft
mills
(
123)

m
Assumed
that
15%
of
all
mills
during
any
one
quarter
will
be
required
to
submit
an
exceedance
report
in
addition
to
the
summary
report.
(
15%
of
162
=
24)

n
EPA
must
be
notified
of
all
tests
including
repeat
performance
tests.
(
155
x
1.15
x
3
+
7
x
1.15
=
542)

o
Assumed
15%
of
mills
conduct
construction
or
reconstruction
per
year.
(
15%
of
162
=
24)

p
Assumed
2
yearly
full
time
equivalents
to
handle
litigation
(
2
x
52
x
40
=
4160
hours/
year).

Table
1.
Annual
Respondent
Burden
and
Cost
NESHAP
for
Pulp
and
Paper
Production
(
40
CFR
Part
63,
Subpart
S)
(
A)
(
B)
(
C)
(
D)
(
E)
(
F)
(
G)
(
H)

#
bleaching
lines
Hours
Per
Number
of
Emissions
Hours
Number
of
Technica
l
Manageme
nt
Clerical
Total
#
mills
total
Occurrence
Occurrenc
es
Testing
Cost
Per
Respondents
Hours
Hours
Hours
Cost
#
mills
with
bleaching
lines
(
Technical
Per
Per
Responden
t
Per
Year
(
a)
Per
Year
Per
Year
Per
Year
Per
Year
hours)
Responden
t
Occurrenc
e
Per
Year
@$
64.60
@$
95.32
@$
40.09
Burden
Item
Per
Year
(
C=
AxB)
(
CxD)
(
Ex0.05)
(
Ex0.1)

1.
Applications
Not
applicable
2.
Surveys
and
Studies
Not
applicable
3.
Reporting
Requirements
A
.
Read
and
Understand
Rule
Requirements
(
MACT
I
Mills)
(
b)
40
1
$
0
40
7
c,
d
280
14
28
$
20,545
B
.
Read
and
Understand
Rule
Requirements
(
MACT
III
Mills)
(
b)
20
1
$
0
20
0c,
d
0
0
0
$
0
B
.
Required
Activities
1.1)
Pulping
processes
(
Non­
Sulfite)

a)
Provide
documentation
that
vent
streams
are
introduced
to
24
1
$
0
24
4
c,
e
96
5
10
$
7,044
the
flame
zone
of
a
boiler,
lime
kiln,
or
recovery
furnace,
or
b)
Provide
documentation
that
the
control
incinerator
is
operating
60
1
$
0
60
1
c,
f
60
3
6
$
4,402
at
a
minimum
level
of
1600
F
and
0.75
sec
residence
time,
or
c)
Performance
test
of
control
device
­
test
method
308
24
1
$
14,000
24
1
c,
f,
g
24
1
2
$
1,761
1.2)
Pulping
Processes
(
Sulfite)
24
1
$
14,000
24
0
c,
g,
i
0
0
0
$
0
Performance
test
of
control
device
­
test
method
308
2.1)
Bleaching
process
vent
scrubber
(
MACT
I
Mills)
­
Choice
of
a)
Provide
documentation
of
scrubber
operating
parameters
60
1
$
0
60
4
c,
j
240
12
24
$
17,610
or
previous
performance
tests
results,
or
b)
Performance
test
of
scrubber
or
control
device
24
1
$
10,000
24
0
c,
g,
j
0
0
0
$
0
­
test
method
26A
2.2)
Bleaching
process
vent
scrubber
(
MACT
III
Mills)
­
Choice
of
a)
Provide
documentation
of
scrubber
operating
parameters,
60
1
$
0
60
0c,
j
0
0
0
$
0
or
previous
performance
test
results,
or
b)
Performance
test
of
scrubber
or
control
device
24
1
$
10,000
24
0
c,
g,
j
0
0
0
$
0
­
test
method
26A
3.1)
Pulping
wastewater
treatment
(
Non­
Sulfite)

a)
Performance
test
of
condensate
segregation
and
24
1
$
16,000
24
4
c,
h,
k
96
5
10
$
7,044
control
device
(
test
method
305),
or
b)
Performance
test
of
biotreatment
unit
­
test
method
304
24
1
$
11,000
24
2
c,
h,
l
48
2
5
$
3,522
3.2)
Pulping
wastewater
treatment
(
Sulfite)

Performance
test
of
control
device
­
test
method
305
24
1
$
16,000
24
0
c,
h,
m
0
0
0
$
0
Repeat
of
performance
test
1)
test
method
308
­
pulping
24
1
$
14,000
24
0
c,
g,
n
0
0
0
$
0
2)
test
method
26A
­
bleaching
24
1
$
10,000
24
0
c,
g,
n
0
0
0
$
0
3)
test
method
305
­
kraft
pulping
ww
24
1
$
16,000
24
1
c,
h,
n
24
1
2
$
1,761
4)
test
method
304
­
kraft
pulping
ww
24
1
$
11,000
24
0
c,
h,
n
0
0
0
$
0
5)
test
method
305
­
sulfite
pulping
ww
24
1
$
16,000
24
0
c,
h,
n
0
0
0
$
0
Initial/
Annual
inspection
(
enclosures,
closed
vent,
8
1
$
3,000
8
87
o
696
35
70
$
51,069
wastewater
conveyance
system)­
test
method
21
Monthly
visual
inspection
of
enclosures,
closed
4
12
$
0
48
130
d
6,240
312
624
$
457,860
vent
system,
and
wastewater
conveyance
system.

C
.
Create
Information
Included
in
3.
B
D
.
Gather
Information
Included
in
3.
B
E
.
Report
Preparation
Initial
Notification
Report
16
1
$
0
16
0
c,
d
0
0
0
$
0
<
45
day
after
promul.

Notification
of
compliance
status
16
1
$
0
16
0
c,
d
0
0
0
$
0
Initial
Compliance
Strategy
Report
40
1
$
0
40
0
c,
p
0
0
0
$
0
Compliance
Strategy
Report
Update
16
1
$
0
16
27
p
432
22
43
$
31,698
Semi­
annual
summary
report
16
2
$
0
32
137
d
4,384
219
438
$
321,676
Continuous
monitoring/
Exceedance
reports
24
2
$
0
48
21
q
1,008
50
101
$
73,962
Notification
of
performance
test
4
1
$
0
4
24
c,
r
96
5
10
$
7,044
>
75
day
before
test
Notification
of
construction/
reconstruction
4
1
$
0
4
21
c,
s
84
4
8
$
6,164
>
180day
beforeha
nd
Notification
of
actual
startup
4
1
$
0
4
21
c,
s
84
4
8
$
6,164
<
150
day
after
startup
4.
Recordkeeping
Requirements
A
.
Read
Instructions
Included
in
3.
A
B
.
Plan
Activities
Included
in
3.
B
C
.
Implement
Activities
Included
in
3.
B
D
.
Develop
Record
System
40
1
$
0
40
0
c,
d
0
0
0
$
0
E
.
Record
information
Records
of
continuous
monitoring
for
operating
parameters
2
52
$
0
104
137
d
14,248
712
1,425
$
1,045,447
Records
of
periodic
inspections
(
monthly
Included
in
3.
B
visual
inspections
and
annual
method
21)

Record
startups,
shutdowns,
and
malfunctions
4
12
$
0
48
137
d
6,576
329
658
$
482,514
F
.
Personnel
Training
Not
applicable
G
.
Time
for
audits
8
2
$
0
16
137
d
2,192
110
219
$
160,838
Total:
36,908
1,845
3,691
$
2,708,12
4
TOTAL
INDUSTRY
BURDEN
SUMMARY:

Total
annual
labor
hours
42,444
Annual
costs
in
dollars
$
2,708,124
Footnotes
a
Values
are
rounded
b
MACT
I
Mills
include
kraft,
sulfite,
soda,
and
semi­
chemical
operations.
MACT
III
Mills
include
mechanical,
non­
wood,
and
secondary
fiber
operations.

c
One­
time
activity.
In
out
years,
after
initial
compliance
date,
assume
that
5%
of
mills
affected
as
a
result
of
unexplained
exceedances.

d
Performed
by
all
mills.
(
130
MACT
I
Category
Mills,
338
Stand­
alone
MACT
III
category
mills)

Assume
all
MACT
I
category
mills
will
be
afftected
by
this
rule.
Assume
the
only
MACT
III
category
mills
that
will
be
affected
by
this
rule
are
the
stand­
alone
mills
with
chlorine
bleaching
(
Available
information
estimates
that
only
2%
of
stand­
alone
MACT
III
category
mills
have
chlorine
bleaching
processes
(
2%
of
338
=
7,
After
initial
compliance
assessment
331
mills
are
not
impacted.)
)

Total
number
of
mills
affected
by
this
rule
is
130
+
7
=
137
e
Estimated
that
66.7%
of
mills
will
use
a
recovery
boiler,
power
boiler,
or
lime
kiln
for
control
of
pulping
vents.
There
are
122
non­
sulfite
pulping
mills.
(
66.7%
of
122
=
81)

f
Estimated
that
33.3%
of
mills
will
use
incineration
for
pulping
lines
(
16.7%
will
provide
acceptable
design
specs
(
14),
and
16.7%
will
conduct
performance
tests
(
14)
)

g
Estimate
includes
test
plan,
test
report,
and
parametric
montioring
setup.
Method
308
tests
for
pulping
lines
and
method
26A
tests
for
bleaching
lines.

h
Estimate
includes
test
plan,
test
report,
and
parametric
monitoring
setup.
Method
304
and
305
are
for
wastewater
streams.

i
Assume
that
all
8
sulfite
pulping
mills
will
conduct
performance
tests.

j
94
MACT
I
category
mills
have
bleaching
lines.
90%
will
provide
acceptable
performance
specs
or
previous
test
results
(
85),
10%
will
conduct
performance
tests
(
9)

Assume
2
percent
of
stand­
alone
MACT
III
category
mills
have
bleaching
lines
(
2%
of
338=
7).
90%
will
provide
acceptable
performance
specs
or
previous
test
results
(
6)

10%
will
conduct
performance
tests
(
1).

k
Estimated
that
each
kraft
mill
has
one
pulping
wastewater
control
device.
Of
the
108
kraft
mills,
28
already
have
steam
strippers
in
use,

and
of
the
28,
all
are
assumed
to
conduct
condensate
segregation
and
performance
tests.
Of
the
80
mills
without
control,
35
will
use
biotreatment
control
and,
45
will
install
steam
strippers.
Facilities
installing
new
steam
strippers
are
assumed
to
perform
initial
condenstate
segregation
and
performance
tests.

Facilites
installing
new
biotreatment
control
will
perform
initial
performance
tests.

l
Estimated
that
each
kraft
mill
has
one
pulping
wastewater
control
device.
Assumed
33%
will
use
biotreatment.
(
33%
of
108
=
36)
Per
footnote
"
c,"
5
%
of
36=
2.

m
Assume
sulfite
mills
will
monitor
gas
scrubber
parameters
and
use
Water­
8
Model
for
emission
estimates.

n
Assumed
that
15%
of
performance
tests
are
failed
and
need
to
be
repeated.

o
Initial
and
annual
activity.
Assumed
that
EPA
is
notified
each
year
of
the
testing.
Assumed
2/
3
of
all
MACT
I
mills
have
positive
pressure
points
in
their
vent
systems
and
will
have
to
test
using
method
21
(
2/
3
x
130
=
87).

p
Assume
that
25%
of
all
kraft
mills
are
still
required
to
submit
compliance
strategy
reports
(
25%
of
108
kraft
mills
=
27
affected
kraft
mills)
in
order
to
comply
by
2006.

q
Assumed
that
15%
of
all
affected
mills
during
any
one
quarter
will
be
required
to
submit
an
exceedance
report
in
addition
to
the
summary
report.
(
15%
of
162
=
24)

r
EPA
must
be
notified
of
all
tests
including
repeat
performance
tests.
((
130
x
.05
=
7)
7
x
1.15
x
3
=
24)
(
see
footnotes
c
and
q)

s
Assumed
15%
of
all
affected
mills
conduct
construction
or
reconstruction
per
year.
(
15%
of
137
=
21)