Document ID: SEC-2009-1612-0001
Agency: sec
Document Type: Notice
Title: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc. Relating to Conduct of Business on the Exchange
Posted Date: 2009-11-17T05:00Z

[Federal Register: November 17, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 220)]
[Notices]               
[Page 59279-59283]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17no09-115]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-60961; File No. SR-Phlx-2009-84]

 
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule 
Change by NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc. Relating to Conduct of Business on the 
Exchange

November 6, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given 
that on October 29, 2009, NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc. (``Phlx'' or 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in 
Items I, II, and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the 
Exchange. On November 6, 2009, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1. The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the Rules to: (i) Create an 
expedited hearing process for members posing an immediate threat to the 
safety of persons or property, seriously disrupting Exchange 
operations, or are in possession of a firearm on the Exchange trading 
floor; (ii) increase the time period a member may be physically 
excluded from the trading floor; (iii) increase the maximum amount a 
member may be charged pursuant to Rule 60; (iv) amend language 
applicable to contesting citations and create a forum fee of $100 for 
contesting citations; (v) add clarifying language to prohibit alcohol 
and illegal controlled substances on the trading floor; (vi) increase 
fines for various regulations; (vii) require non-member visitors who 
are performing contract work at the Exchange to provide a certificate 
of insurance and add a fee schedule for failure to provide such proof 
of insurance; (viii) add a new rule to limit exchange liability and 
require reimbursement of certain expenses; (ix) amend the disciplinary 
rules to allow Enforcement Staff to request a hearing; and (x) increase 
the limit on fees from $5,000 to $10,000 and add additional clarifying 
language to Rule 970.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
Web site at http://nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/NASDAQOMXPHLX/
Filings/, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the 
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
Order and Decorum Regulations
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to ensure the efficient, 
undisrupted conduct of business on the Exchange and provide a trading 
floor environment free from conduct that could distract or interfere 
with market activity. Additionally, the Exchange proposes to provide a 
fair process for members to be heard with respect to removals.
    Currently, the Exchange may summarily remove a member from the 
floor for breaches of regulations that relate to the administration of 
order, decorum, health, safety and welfare on the Exchange (``order and 
decorum'' regulations). Exchange By-Law Article VIII, Section 8-1, 
provides ``[t]he Exchange shall make and enforce rules and regulations 
relating to order, decorum, health, safety and welfare on the options 
trading floor and the immediately adjacent premises of the Exchange and 
shall be empowered to impose penalties for violations thereof. For 
breaches of order, the President and his designated staff may exclude 
Members, participants and Member Organizations and participant 
organizations (as applicable) and employees from the trading floor and 
the immediately adjacent premises, or may impose fines consistent with 
Exchange rules, or both. They shall administer the provisions of these 
By-Laws and the Rules of the Exchange pertaining to the trading floor 
and the immediately adjacent premises of the Exchange.'' \3\ Removal 
from the trading floor is not the exclusive sanction for breaches of 
order and decorum and the regulations thereunder. In addition to 
removal, a member could also be subject to a fine or the matter could 
also be referred to the Business Conduct Committee where it would 
proceed in accordance with Rules 960.1 through 960.12.\4\ Removal 
occurs when a

[[Page 59280]]

member poses an immediate threat to the safety of persons or property, 
seriously disrupts Exchange operations, or is in possession of a 
firearm. When a member is removed under any of these circumstances, the 
current rule provides that the member is removed for the remainder of 
the trading day. Removal is ordered only for the serious types of 
breaches of order and decorum. The Exchange currently has the ability 
to exclude a member for multiple days. Each day a determination is made 
as to whether the member poses a continued threat. The Exchange 
believes that this process of making daily determinations after an 
incident has occurred is disruptive and poses a risk in permitting 
members to return to the trading floor only to possibly be removed 
again once that member can be evaluated in the event that the threat is 
serious and ongoing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ For purposes of this proposed Rule, the premises immediately 
adjacent to the trading floor shall include the following: (1) All 
premises other than the trading floor that are under Exchange 
control; and (2) premises in the building where the Exchange 
maintains its principal office and place of business, namely 1900 
Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. See Exchange Rule 60 
(b)(iii).
    \4\ These rules provide the jurisdiction, procedures and process 
by which an Exchange member, member organization, or any partner, 
officer, director or person employed by or associated with any 
member or member organization may be charged with a violation within 
the disciplinary jurisdiction of the Exchange. Reports to the 
Securities and Exchange Commission are made pursuant to Rule 19d-
1(c) under the Act. See also Exchange Rule 60 (b)(iv).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 60, Sanctions for Breach of 
Regulations, to exclude a member up to five (5) business days to ensure 
that it is able to provide a trading floor environment free from 
conduct that could distract or interfere with market activity. The 
Exchange believes that exclusion for the remainder of the trading day 
is not a serious deterrent to violating the most serious order and 
decorum rules, especially where members violate such rules near the end 
of a trading day. While the disciplinary rules may provide for 
discipline of such members, the immediate threat that is posed to other 
members and Exchange staff as well as the order of the operation of the 
trading floor is not alleviated by a same day suspension. The Exchange 
acknowledges that removal may result in a loss of business for the 
member and therefore has proposed an expedited hearing to create a fair 
procedure for the immediate removal.\5\ The proposal would allow for an 
expedited hearing to take place within two full working days hours 
[sic] after the member's exclusion from the trading floor. This would 
initially exclude the member in all removal circumstances for the 
forty-eight hour period, which the Exchange believes would serve as a 
``cooling down'' period. The member would be provided with written 
notice of the hearing, including the date, time and place of the 
hearing. The member may be represented by counsel. The Expedited 
Hearing Officer or his or her designee would conduct the hearing. The 
Expedited Hearing Officer would make a determination if the removal 
should continue and if so would determine for what period of time, not 
to exceed a total of five (5) business days. The determination of the 
Hearing Officer would be based on the severity of the threat posed to 
persons on the trading floor, the disruptiveness caused by the member 
and the safety and welfare of persons on the trading floor. A ruling 
would be made at the time of the hearing and a written decision would 
be provided afterwards, within two (2) business days. The exclusion 
would only apply to the particular member's physical presence on the 
trading floor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The removal would not impact other associated persons of the 
member organization, only the member that was involved in the 
conduct at issue. Also, the member that is subject to the removal 
would not be denied any electronic access to the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to amend Commentary (a) to Rule 60 to 
increase the maximum amount of a pre-set fine for order and decorum 
violations. The Exchange believes that the proposed increase from a 
maximum of $5,000.00 to a maximum of $10,000.00 is appropriate and 
warranted considering the types of violations that may arise from 
violations of order and decorum. The Exchange believes that the fines 
should be increased where the safety and welfare of members are at 
issue and further that the fines should deter members from engaging in 
certain conduct.
    Additionally, the proposal seeks to further clarify the contested 
citation process. Specifically, the Hearing Director may decide that: 
(i) The citation should be overturned; (ii) the citation is valid as 
issued; or (iii) the citation as issued should be modified to specify 
either a higher or lower fine than the one on the notice as issued. 
Further, the Exchange proposes to add a forum fee of $100 if a fine is 
contested pursuant to Rule 60 and the citation is upheld by the 
reviewing body.\6\ The Exchange also proposes to add language to Rule 
60 Commentary (a) .07 to make clear that a report would not be made to 
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') in the case of 
a contested citation where the fine is less than $1,000 and the Hearing 
Director found in favor of the appellant. The addition of the words 
``and the Hearing Director finds in favor of the appellant'' is only to 
clarify an existing practice. The Exchange believes that the additional 
language is clarifying language with respect to the findings of the 
Hearing Director. The forum fee will assist the Exchange in defraying 
costs associated with conducting contested citation hearings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Exchange currently charges a fee to review disputes 
pursuant to Exchange Rule 124. See also Securities Exchange Act Rel. 
No. 46600 (October 4, 2002), 67 FR 63480 (October 11, 2002) (SR-
CBOE-2002-39) (CBOE has a similar rule imposing a forum fee against 
persons contesting citations).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to further specify two categories within Rule 
60 Regulations, namely alcohol and illegal controlled substances. While 
the Exchange believes that these violations are currently prohibited 
under its current regulations, the Exchange proposes to specifically 
state in Regulations 1, Smoking, and 4, Order, respectively, that 
alcoholic beverages and illegal controlled substances are specifically 
prohibited on the trading floor or on the premises immediately adjacent 
to the trading floor. The Exchange believes that specifically stating 
that alcoholic beverages and illegal controlled substances are not 
permitted on the trading floor is a clear statement which eliminates 
ambiguity. The Exchange believes that this language reinforces already 
existing policies. The Exchange proposes to amend the title of 
Regulation 1 to state ``Smoking and Alcohol'' and set a fine schedule 
for violations of Regulation 1 relating to alcohol. The Exchange 
proposes a $1,000.00 fine for the 1st occurrence and thereafter 
referral to the Business Conduct Committee. The Exchange proposes to 
amend Regulation 4 to set a $5,000.00 fine for possession of an illegal 
controlled substance and thereafter referral to the Business Conduct 
Committee. The Exchange believes that these fines are appropriate given 
the nature of the acts and that the fines would serve as a deterrent 
for members with regard to the presence of those substances on the 
trading floor. Similarly, the Exchange proposes to add restitution to 
the vandalism fine schedule to clarify that members are required to 
make restitution to the Exchange for any vandalism in addition to the 
fine. The Exchange believes this added language will likewise reinforce 
an existing policy.
    With respect to fines related to Regulation 1, Smoking, Regulation 
2, Foods, Liquids and Beverages, Trash, Litter and Vandalism, and 
Regulation 4, Order, the Exchange proposes increasing those fines to 
create a deterrent in further prohibiting such activity. The fines in 
Regulation 1 would be increased from an Official Warning for the 1st 
occurrence, $250.00 for the 2nd occurrence and $500.00 for the 3rd 
occurrence to $250.00 for the 1st occurrence, $500.00 for the 2nd 
occurrence, and $1,000.00 for the 3rd occurrence. The fines in 
Regulation 2 for Foods, Liquids and Beverages would

[[Page 59281]]

be increased from $100.00 for a 1st occurrence, $200.00 for a 2nd 
occurrence, and $300.00 for a 3rd occurrence to $250.00 for a 1st 
occurrence, $500.00 for a 2nd occurrence and $1,000 for a 3rd 
occurrence. The Vandalism fines would be increased from $250.00 for a 
1st occurrence, $500.00 for a 2nd occurrence and $1,000.00 for a 3rd 
occurrence to $3,000.00 and restitution for the 1st occurrence, 
$5,000.00 and restitution for the 2nd occurrence, $10,000.00 and 
restitution for the 3rd occurrence. Regulation 4 fines would be 
increased for fines resulting from indecorous conduct from $250.00 for 
the 1st occurrence, $500.00 for the 2nd occurrence, and $1,000.00 for 
the 3rd occurrence to $500.00 for the 1st occurrence, $1,000.00 for the 
2nd occurrence and $2,500.00 for the 3rd occurrence. Regulation 4 fines 
for threatening, abusive, harassing or intimidating speech or conduct 
would be increased from $1,000.00 for the 1st occurrence, $2,500.00 for 
the 2nd occurrence and $5,000.00 for the 3rd occurrence to $2,500.00 
for the 1st occurrence, $5,000.00 for the 2nd occurrence and the 3rd 
occurrence would be a referral to the Business Conduct Committee. The 
Exchange believes these increased fines \7\ are necessary to create an 
adequate deterrence to prevent certain conduct on the trading floor. In 
addition, the process of issuing citations and holding hearings for 
appeals can significantly divert Exchange time and resources away from 
the regulatory purposes of the Exchange. In addition, the goal of 
maintaining order and decorum on the trading floor is best accomplished 
when floor members are deterred by such conduct [sic], rather than when 
violations occur and fines are simply paid. The Exchange believes that 
by increasing fees, members will be deterred from violating the order 
and decorum rules which exist for the safety and welfare of Exchange 
members and employees alike. Finally, the Exchange believes that the 
fine increases are commensurate with the possible threat such conduct 
creates to the safety and welfare of others on the trading floor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The Exchange increased the maximum amount of a pre-sent fine 
for order and decorum violations from $1,000 to $5,000 in 2002. See 
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 45905 (May 10, 2002), 67 FR 
34978 (May 16, 2002) (SR-Phlx-2002-09).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes amending Regulation 5, Visitors, to require 
non-member visitors who are performing contract work at the Exchange on 
behalf of a member to provide a certificate of insurance evidencing 
Professional Liability Insurance. This would include non-member 
visitors performing any type of work at the Exchange or utilizing 
building facilities. The Exchange leases its premises and this 
requirement would assist the Exchange in shifting costs that arise from 
any liability to the Exchange as a result of damage or loss caused by a 
contractor or other person engaged by a member. The Exchange proposes a 
fine schedule as follows: $1,000.00 for the 1st occurrence, $5,000.00 
for the 2nd occurrence and referral to the Business Conduct Committee 
thereafter. The Exchange believes that by imposing a fine for 
violations of the obligation to require contractors hired by members to 
produce a certificate of insurance will deter such behavior and thereby 
benefit the Exchange and its members by having only insured contractors 
at the Exchange and thereby avoiding unnecessary costs.
Limitation of Exchange Liability and Reimbursement of Certain Expenses
    The Exchange proposes the addition of a new rule 652. The purpose 
of this new rule is to limit the liability of the Exchange and obtain 
reimbursement of legal costs incurred to defend litigation brought 
against the Exchange. Legal proceedings can significantly divert staff 
resources away from the Exchange's regulatory and business purposes. In 
addition, these proceedings often require the Exchange to secure 
outside counsel, a costly undertaking. The Exchange believes that 
establishing a rule that limits liability, seeks reimbursement of costs 
related to document production and seeks reimbursement of other legal 
costs may reduce non merit-based or vexatious legal proceedings against 
the Exchange by member litigants and help protect against the 
Exchange's resources being unnecessarily diverted from regulatory and 
business objectives, thus strengthening the overall organization.
    The Exchange proposes to limit liability for any damages sustained 
by a member, member organization, or person associated with any of the 
foregoing, arising out of or relating to the use or enjoyment by such 
person or entity of Exchange facilities. Further, the Exchange proposes 
to add language to state that in the event that an action or proceeding 
is brought or a claim made to impose liability on the Exchange for an 
alleged failure on its part to prevent or to require action by a 
member, member organization, or person associated with any of the 
foregoing, such person or entity may, in the discretion of the 
Exchange, be required to reimburse the Exchange for: All expenses, 
including counsel fees incurred in connection with said action, 
proceeding or claim; recovery if any against the Exchange upon a final 
determination that the Exchange was liable for the damage sustained; 
any payment made by the Exchange, with the approval of the member, 
member organization or person associated with any of the foregoing in 
connection with any settlement; provided that no member, member 
organization or person associated with any of the foregoing shall be 
required to reimburse the Exchange for any fine or any other civil 
penalty imposed on the Exchange by the Commission or other governmental 
entity for a violation by the Exchange of any provision of the Act or 
of any Commission Regulation, or where indemnification would otherwise 
be prohibited. Also Rule 652 provides that in the event that a member, 
member organization, or person associated with any of the foregoing 
fails to remit any amount due the Exchange under this rule or Rule 651 
\8\ such person shall be responsible for all costs of collection 
incurred by the Exchange, including counsel fees.\9\ The Exchange 
proposes to shift the cost of producing records, where legally 
required, to the member or member organization where such records 
relate to the business of affairs of a member, member organization or 
person associated with a member or member organization. The Exchange 
receives many requests for record production which are time consuming 
and increase the costs of operating the Exchange when staff resources 
are diverted away from Exchange business to meet the deadlines of legal 
document production related to member disputes and other legal 
proceedings involving members. The Exchange believes that this cost 
will assist the Exchange in reducing these costs. Also, the Exchange 
receives requests for documents from non-members who seek the documents 
from the Exchange instead of issuing a subpoena to a member, who may 
also have such documents. The Exchange seeks to bill the members who 
are responsible for the request to produce

[[Page 59282]]

documents received by the Exchange. The Exchange believes that requests 
for production of documents shift the burden of gathering and producing 
litigation materials from the member to the Exchange and the Exchange 
desires to shift the burden back to the member litigant. Rule 652(d) 
would apply to any costs incurred by the Exchange only after the rule 
becomes effective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Rule 651 requires members, member organizations, foreign 
currency options participants, foreign currency options participant 
organizations, or persons associated with any of the foregoing who 
bring legal proceedings against the Exchange to reimburse the 
Exchange for all costs associated with defending such proceedings, 
only when such persons or entities do not prevail and the Exchange 
's costs exceed a specified amount. See Securities Exchange Act 
Release Nos. [sic] 50159 (August 5, 2009), 69 FR 49933 (August 12, 
2004) (SR-Phlx-2004-47).
    \9\ This would not apply to any objection or appeal by a member, 
member organization, or person associated with any of the foregoing 
considered by the Exchange or the Commission, or any appeal from a 
decision of the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Minor Rule Plan
    The Exchange proposes amending Rule 970, Floor Procedure Advices: 
Violations, Penalties, and Procedures, to increase the limit on fees 
from $5,000 to $10,000. Currently in lieu of commencing a disciplinary 
proceeding, the Exchange may impose a fine not to exceed $5,000 on any 
member, member organization, or any partner, director or person 
employed by or associated with any member or member organization, for 
any violation of a Floor Procedure Advice of the Exchange, which 
violation the Exchange shall have determined is minor in nature, 
subject to the other requirements contained in Rule 970. The Exchange 
proposes to raise the amount of the fine from $5,000 to $10,000. 
Additionally, the Exchange has added additional language clarifying 
when fines are to be publically reported to the Commission. Any fine 
imposed pursuant to this Rule, and not exceeding $2,500, and not 
contested shall not be publicly reported to the members except as may 
be required by Rule 19d-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 
and as may be required by any other regulatory authority. Any fine 
imposed pursuant to this Rule which exceeds $2,500 shall be publicly 
reported to the members and as required by Rule 19d-1 under the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and as may be required by any other 
regulatory authority. The Exchange believes that increasing the cap on 
fines which are not subject to a disciplinary proceeding will provide 
for a more efficient operation of the minor rule plan and allow certain 
Option Floor Procedure Advices to be increased without incurring the 
costs and resources of the regulatory staff to commence disciplinary 
proceedings. The Exchange believes that fines that are capped at $2,500 
may not create a deterrent and this increase will provide Exchange 
staff the ability to consider larger fines for violations of Floor 
Procedure Advices. The proposed language further explains the 
requirements for reporting fines to the Commission when the fine 
exceeds a certain amount.
Disciplinary Rules
    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 960.5 to add language to allow 
Enforcement Staff to request a hearing. Currently, a hearing on the 
Statement of Charges shall at the request of either Respondent or upon 
motion of the Business Conduct Committee be held before a Hearing 
Panel. The Exchange proposes modifying this process to allow 
Enforcement Staff to request a hearing. There are circumstances where 
the Respondent may not request a hearing and Enforcement staff may 
desire such a hearing. The Exchange believes that an opportunity to 
present information to the Hearing Panel aside from a Wells Notice and 
response may benefit the Hearing Panel in making a determination. The 
Exchange desires to afford the Enforcement Staff the opportunity to 
make such a request when they deem it necessary.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 
6(b) of the Act \10\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 
6(b)(5) of the Act \11\ in particular, in that it is designed to 
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments 
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national 
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public 
interest, because the proposal should facilitate prompt, appropriate, 
and effective discipline for violations of Rule 60 and the regulations 
thereunder designed to maintain order on the Exchange. In addition, the 
Exchange believes that the proposed rule is consistent with section 
6(b)(6) of the Act \12\ which requires the rules of an exchange provide 
that its members be appropriately disciplined for violations of the Act 
as well as the rules and regulations thereunder, by imposing increased 
fine amounts for breaches of order and decorum to better reflect the 
severity of the violation and provide an appropriate form of deterrence 
for violation of Rule 60 and the regulations thereunder. The Exchange 
believes that the proposal to exclude members up to five (5) days and 
conduct an expedited hearing would provide a fair process for members 
to present their arguments surrounding a removal, while also allowing 
the Exchange to operate without disruption and threat of safety to 
members on the trading floor. The increase in the maximum amount of a 
pre-set fine for order and decorum violations is appropriate to serve 
as a deterrent to members in violating the order and decorum 
regulations which are necessary for the orderly operation of the 
market. The increased fines should create further deterrents in 
preventing certain activity on the trading floor which disrupts the 
orderly operation of the floor. The minor rule plan assists the 
regulatory staff in protecting its market to the benefit of customers. 
Also, the clarifying language and addition of fine schedules related to 
alcohol and illegal controlled substances to the Regulations should 
further clarify the order and decorum rules for members. The proposed 
language requiring non-member visitors to carry insurance should assist 
the Exchange in limiting its resources [sic] as well as proposed Rule 
652 which is designed to conserve Exchange resources, which can be 
easily diverted to defending litigation claims and responding to non-
Exchange related litigation matters on behalf of its members. Proposed 
Rule 652 is meant to prevent the Exchange from diverting valued 
resources away from its main regulatory responsibilities and instead 
being consumed in litigation designed to siphon Exchange monies and 
staff. The Exchange believes that raising the amount of the fines that 
are subject to the minor rule plan will assist the Exchange in 
enforcing its rules in an efficient and expedited manner will [sic] 
still deterring members from committing ongoing violations. Finally, 
the Exchange believes that the amendments to the Hearing rule benefits 
[sic] the disciplinary process by allowing Exchange staff the 
opportunity to request hearings. The efficient operation of the 
disciplinary process allows for fair hearings of its members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent 
with Section 6(b) of the Act \13\ in general, and furthers the 
objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \14\ in particular, in that it 
is an equitable allocation of reasonable fees and other charges among 
Exchange members. The Exchange believes that this proposal is equitable 
in that the forum fee would apply to all members equally. The addition 
of the forum fee will help the Exchange offset costs associated with 
reviewing contested citations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not

[[Page 59283]]

necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may 
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
which the Exchange consents, the Commission shall: (a) By order approve 
such proposed rule change, or (b) institute proceedings to determine 
whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File No. SR-Phlx-2009-84 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2009-84. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and 
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, on official business 
days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also 
will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of 
the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the 
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from 
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make 
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
Phlx-2009-84 and should be submitted on or before December 8, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-27467 Filed 11-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P