Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0076-0373
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2005-06-13T04:00Z

4/
19/
05
Information
on
BART
non­
EGU
Source
Categories
­
From
Draft
BART
RIA
The
10
BART
source
categories
with
SO
2
and
NOx
controls
available
are:

industrial
boilers
(
250
mmBTU/
hr
heat
input
capacity
and
greater);

petroleum
refineries;

kraft
pulp
mills;

Portland
cement
plants;

hydrofluoric,
sulfuric,
and
nitric
acid;

chemical
process
plants;

iron
and
steel
mills;

coke
oven
batteries;

sulfur
recovery
plants;
and

primary
aluminum
ore
reductions.

For
seven
BART
source
categories
only
NO
x
controls
are
available:

lime
kilns,

glass
fiber
processing
plants,

municipal
incinerators
(
250
tons
refuse
burn
capacity
or
greater),

coal
cleaning
plants
(
thermal
dryers),

carbon
black
plants
(
furnace
process),

phosphate
rock
processing
plants,
and

secondary
metal
production
facilities.
The
remaining
eight
source
categories
either
have
no
controls
available
or
no
BARTeligible
units:

primary
lead
smelters,

primary
copper
smelters,

primary
zinc
smelters,

fuel
conversion
plants,

sintering
plants,

charcoal
production
facilities,

taconite
ore
processing
plants,
and

petroleum
storage
and
transfer
facilities.
Summary
Tables:
Baseline
SO2
and
NOx
Emissions
and
Number
of
BART­
Eligible
Units
from
BART
Source
Categories
in
2015
Note:
BART
source
categories
are
listed
in
descending
order
of
SO
2
baseline
emissions
in
each
of
the
next
two
tables.
Emissions
data
is
taken
from
BART
emissions
TSD
(
draft).

SO2
Emissions
and
Number
of
BART­
Eligible
Units
for
BART
Source
Categories
in
2015
BART
Source
Category
Baseline
Emissions
(
tons)
Number
of
BART­
Eligible
Units
Industrial
boilers
420,782
89
Petroleum
refineries
199,483
42
Kraft
pulp
mills
119,818
14
Portland
cement
plants
116,835
18
Hydrofluoric,
sulfuric,
and
nitric
acid
plants
96,741
10
Sulfur
recovery
plants
59,766
2
Chemical
process
plants
47,700
2
Primary
aluminum
ore
reduction
plants
47,552
3
Carbon
black
plants
41,853
12
Iron
and
steel
mills
23,541
3
Secondary
metal
production
facilities
9,988
0
Coke
oven
batteries
9,815
0
Glass
fiber
processing
plants
2,170
0
Coal
cleaning
plants
1,530
0
Municipal
incinerators
284
0
Phosphate
rock
processing
plants
21
0
Total:
1,208,088
195
NOx
Emissions
and
Number
of
BART­
Eligible
Units
for
BART
Source
Categories
in
2015
BART
Source
Category
Baseline
Emissions
(
tons)
Number
of
BART­
Eligible
Units
Industrial
boilers
217,063
924
Petroleum
refineries
86,566
457
Kraft
pulp
mills
103,614
327
Portland
cement
plants
120,567
78
Hydrofluoric,
sulfuric,
and
nitric
acid
plants
17,059
20
Chemical
process
plants
72,577
138
Iron
and
steel
mills
20,963
80
Coke
oven
batteries
10,389
18
Sulfur
recovery
plants
651
3
Primary
aluminum
ore
reduction
plants
1,676
15
Lime
kilns
12,849
30
Glass
fiber
processing
plants
6,677
27
Municipal
incinerators
1,656
4
Coal
cleaning
plants
1,110
5
Carbon
black
plants
4,645
2
Phosphate
rock
processing
plants
719
1
Secondary
metal
production
facilities
1,377
3
Total
681,765
2,132
Cost
and
Cost­
Effectiveness
Tables:
For
5
Significant
BART
non­
EGU
Source
Categories
(
Significance
defined
in
terms
of
SO2
baseline
emissions
from
BART­
eligible
sources)

Industrial
Boilers

Petroleum
Refineries

Kraft
Pulp
Mills

Portland
Cement
Plants

Hydrofluoric,
Sulfuric,
and
Nitric
Acid
Plants

Scenario
1:
$
1,000/
ton
average
cost
cap;
Scenario
2:
$
4,000/
ton
average
cost
cap;
Scenario
3:
$
10,000/
ton
average
cost
cap
Marginal
cost
is
estimated
as
increment
of
impact
between
scenarios.
2015
Cost
and
Cost­
Effectiveness
Results
for
SO2
Control
at
BART­
Eligible
Industrial
Boilers
Illustrative
Scenarios
Discount
Rate
Total
Annualized
Costs
(
million
1999$)
Annualized
Average
Cost­
Effectiveness
($/
ton)
Marginal
Costs
($/
ton)

Scenario
1
7%
$
26.0
$
807
$
807
3%
$
47.8
$
727
$
727
Scenario
2
7%
294.1
1,943
$
2,250
3%
265.0
1,612
2,202
Scenario
3
7%
610.3
3,047
$
6,463
3%
504.6
2,471
6,023
Control
techonology
modeled
in
scenarios:
FGD
scrubbers
2015
Cost
and
Cost­
Effectiveness
Results
for
NOx
Control
at
BART­
Eligible
Industrial
Boilers
Illustrative
Scenarios
Discount
Rate
Total
Annualized
Costs
(
million
1999$)
Annualized
Average
Cost­
Effectiveness
($/
ton)
Marginal
Costs
($/
ton)

Scenario
1
7%
$
48.6
$
722
$
722
3%
$
87.2
$
779
$
779
Scenario
2
7%
233.5
1,790
$
2,929
3%
136.8
1,049
2,684
Scenario
3
7%
235.1
1,801
24,242
3%
138.7
1,063
22,840
Control
techonology
modeled
in
scenarios:
Low
NOx
burners,
SCR
2015
Cost
and
Cost­
Effectiveness
Results
for
SO2
Control
at
BART­
Eligible
Units
at
Petroleum
Refineries
Illustrative
Scenarios
Discount
Rate
Total
Annualized
Costs
(
million
1999$)
Annualized
Average
Cost­
Effectiveness
($/
ton)
Marginal
Costs
($/
ton)

Scenario
1
7%
$
1.9
$
906
$
906
3%
$
12.5
$
736
$
736
Scenario
2
7%
54.0
1,724
$
1,783
3%
72.7
1,734
2,417
Scenario
3
7%
223.5
3,958
6,741
3%
167.3
2,858
5,692
Control
technology
modeled
in
scenarios:
FGD
scrubbers
2015
Cost
and
Cost­
Effectiveness
Results
for
NOx
Control
at
Non­
EGU
BART­
Eligible
Units
at
Petroleum
Refineries
Illustrative
Scenarios
Discount
Rate
Total
Annualized
Costs
(
million
1999$)
Annualized
Average
Cost­
Effectiveness
($/
ton)
Marginal
Costs
($/
ton)

Scenario
1
7%
$
2.3
$
570
$
570
3%
$
2.7
$
595
$
595
Scenario
2
7%
126.2
2,654
$
2,917
3%
142.1
2,772
2,986
Scenario
3
7%
205.1
3,997
20,984
3%
227.6
4,294
48,969
Control
techonology
modeled
in
scenarios:
low
NOx
burners
+
SNCR
2015
Cost
and
Cost­
Effectiveness
Results
for
SO2
Control
at
Non­
EGU
BART­
Eligible
Units
at
Kraft
Pulp
Mills
Illustrative
Scenarios
Discount
Rate
Total
Annualized
Costs
(
million
1999$)
Annualized
Average
Cost­
Effectiveness
($/
ton)
Marginal
Costs
($/
ton)

Scenario
1
7%
$
0.0
$
0
$
0
3%
$
0.0
$
0
$
0
Scenario
2
7%
33.5
3,098
$
3,098
3%
7.0
2,189
2,189
Scenario
3
7%
161.5
5,691
7,287
3%
69.0
4,720
5,432
Control
techonology
modeled
in
scenarios:
FGD
scrubbers
2015
Cost
and
Cost­
Effectiveness
Results
for
NOx
Control
at
Non­
EGU
BART­
Eligible
Units
at
Kraft
Pulp
Mills
Illustrative
Scenarios
Discount
Rate
Total
Annualized
Costs
(
million
1999$)
Annualized
Average
Cost­
Effectiveness
($/
ton)
Marginal
Cost
($/
ton)

Scenario
1
7%
$
20.7
$
587
$
587
3%
$
45.6
$
849
$
849
Scenario
2
7%
108.2
1,762
$
3,344
3%
99.3
1,510
4,452
Scenario
3
7%
151.8
2,308
10,005
3%
99.5
1,512
35,800
Control
techonology
modeled
in
scenarios:
SCR
2015
Cost
and
Cost­
Effectiveness
Results
for
SO2
Control
at
Non­
EGU
BART­
Eligible
Units
at
Portland
Cement
Plants
Illustrative
Scenarios
Discount
Rate
Total
Annualized
Costs
(
million
1999$)
Annualized
Average
Cost­
Effectiveness
($/
ton)
Marginal
Costs
($/
ton)

Scenario
1
7%
$
0.0
$
0
 
3%
$
0.0
$
0
 
Scenario
2
7%
43.5
3,250
$
3,250
3%
49.7
2,710
2,710
Scenario
3
7%
134.4
5,031
6,818
3%
126.8
4,131
6,816
Control
techonology
modeled
in
scenarios:
FGD
scrubbers
2015
Cost
and
Cost­
Effectiveness
Results
for
NOx
Control
at
Non­
EGU
BART­
Eligible
Units
at
Portland
Cement
Plants
Illustrative
Scenarios
Discount
Rate
Total
Annualized
Costs
(
million
1999$)
Annualized
Average
Cost­
Effectiveness
($/
ton)
Marginal
Cost
($/
ton)

Scenario
1
7%
$
2.9
$
150
 
3%
$
20.8
$
674
 
Scenario
2
7%
131.2
2,403
$
3,632
3%
219.3
3,050
4,839
Scenario
3
7%
275.1
3,825
7,731
3%
219.3
3,050
N/
A
Control
techonology
modeled
in
scenarios:
Mid­
kiln
firing,
SNCR,
SCR
2015
Cost
and
Cost­
Effectiveness
Results
for
SO2
Control
at
Non­
EGU
BART­
Eligible
Units
at
Hydrofluoric,
Sulfuric,
and
Nitric
Acid
Plants
Illustrative
Scenarios
Discount
Rate
Total
Annualized
Costs
(
million
1999$)
Annualized
Average
Cost­
Effectiveness
($/
ton)
Marginal
Costs
($/
ton)

Scenario
1
7%
$
9.8
$
287
 
3%
$
9.1
$
268
 
Scenario
2
7%
15.2
413
$
2,067
3%
14.1
385
1,914
Scenario
3
7%
15.2
413
N/
A
3%
14.1
385
N/
A
Control
techonology
modeled
in
scenarios:
increase
sulfur
conversion
to
meet
sulfuric
acid
NSPS
2015
Cost
and
Cost­
Effectiveness
Results
for
NOx
Control
at
Non­
EGU
BART­
Eligible
Units
at
Hydrofluoric,
Sulfuric,
and
Nitric
Acid
Plants
Illustrative
Scenarios
Discount
Rate
Total
Annualized
Costs
(
million
1999$)
Annualized
Average
Cost­
Effectiveness
($/
ton)
Marginal
Costs
($/
ton)

Scenario
1
7%
$
8.2
$
726
 
3%
$
7.3
$
646
 
Scenario
2
7%
8.2
728
$
4,428
3%
7.3
647
2,157
Scenario
3
7%
8.2
728
N/
A
3%
7.3
647
N/
A
Control
techonology
modeled
in
scenarios:
SNCR
on
nitric
acid
units