Document ID: SEC-2020-1851-0001
Agency: sec
Document Type: Notice
Title: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes: Cboe Exchange, Inc.
Posted Date: 2020-11-18T05:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 18, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73533-73537]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-25385]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-90404; File No. SR-CBOE-2020-108]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend 
Certain Fees Related to Transactions in Mini-SPX Index (``XSP'') 
Options

November 12, 2020.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on November 2, 2020, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or 
``Cboe Options'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, 
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe Options'') proposes 
to amend certain fees related to transactions in Mini-SPX Index 
(``XSP'') options. The text of the proposed rule change is provided in 
Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the 
Exchange's website (http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the 
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

[[Page 73534]]

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule to adopt and amend 
certain transaction fees, surcharges and routing fees for XSP options, 
and amend the Select Customer Options Reduction (``SCORe'') Program and 
the Marketing Fee Program in connection with transactions in XSP, 
effective November 2, 2020.
    First, the Exchange notes that it proposes to adopt and amend 
certain fees in connection with XSP in order to more closely align the 
fees assessed for XSP with that of the fees assessed for S&P 500 Index 
(``SPX'') options. XSP options and SPX options track the same 
underlying index, yet XSP options are 1/10 the size of standard SPX 
options contracts. As such, the proposed rule change amends and adopts 
certain fees for XSP in the Rate Table for All Products Excluding 
Underlying Symbol A that are approximately 1/10 of the fees currently 
assessed for SPX, as follows:
     Adopts fee code XF, appended to all Clearing Trading 
Permit Holders (``TPHs'') (capacity ``F'') and for Non-Clearing TPH 
Affiliates (capacity ``L'') (collectively, ``Firms'') orders in XSP and 
assesses a fee of $0.06 per contract. The proposed fee is approximately 
1/10 of the fees assessed for Firm orders in SPX ($0.26 transaction fee 
per fee code FH + $0.17 Index License Surcharge + $0.21 SPX Execution 
Surcharge);
     Amends fee code MX, which is currently appended to all 
Market-Maker (capacity ``M'') orders in XSP and assesses a fee of $0.23 
per contract, to assess a fee of $0.045 per contract. The proposed fee 
is approximately 1/10 of the fees assessed for Market-Maker orders in 
SPX ($0.28 transaction per fee code MS + $0.17 Index License 
Surcharge); and
     Adopts fee code XB, appended to all Broker-Dealer 
(capacity ``B''), Joint Back-Office (capacity ``J''), Non-TPH Market-
Maker (capacity ``N''), and Professional (capacity ``U'') 
(collectively, ``Non-Customers'') orders in XSP and assesses a fee of 
$0.08 per contract. The proposed fee is approximately 1/10 of the fees 
assessed for Non-Customer orders in SPX ($0.42 transaction fee for fee 
code BT + $0.17 Index License Surcharge + $0.21 SPX Execution 
Surcharge).
    In addition to the above, the proposed rule change also amends the 
Complex Surcharge, which currently assesses a $0.12 surcharge on 
Market-Maker, Firm and Non-Customer orders in equity, ETF and ETN 
options and all other index products. Footnote 35 provides that the 
Complex Surcharge applies per contract per side for noncustomer complex 
order executions that remove liquidity from the Complex Order Book 
(``COB'') and auction responses in the Complex Order Auction (``COA'') 
and the AIM in all classes except Sector Indexes and Underlying Symbol 
List A (which includes SPX).\3\ Specifically, the Exchange amends 
footnote 35 to also exclude complex transactions in XSP, along with 
Sector Indexes and Underlying Symbol List A, from the Complex 
Surcharge. By not assessing the Complex Surcharge for Market-Maker, 
Firm and Non-Customer orders in XSP, the fees assessed for such orders, 
as proposed, will be more consistent with fees currently assessed on 
Market-Maker, Firm and Non-Customer orders in SPX. The Exchange also 
amends Rate Table--All Products Excluding Underlying Symbol List A so 
that the Automated Improvement Mechanism (``AIM'') Contra fee 
(applicable to orders yielding fee code YB and assesses a fee of $0.07) 
does not apply to orders in XSP. The Exchange amends footnote 18, which 
is appended to the AIM Contra fee, to provide that applicable standard 
transaction fees will apply to AIM, SAM, FLEX AIM and FLEX SAM 
executions in XSP, Sector Indexes and Underlying Symbol List A (which 
includes SPX). This proposed change will likewise provide consistency 
between the fees assessed for orders in XSP and SPX. In addition to 
this, because fee code XF will assess a fee of $0.06 for all Firm 
orders in XSP, fee codes FA and FD, which assess a fee of $0.20 for 
Firm orders in index products in open outcry and AIM, respectively, and 
are eligible for the Clearing TPH Fee Cap, will no longer be applicable 
to Firm orders in XSP. Therefore, the Exchange proposes to update 
footnote 22, which is appended to the Clearing TPH Fee Cap table, to 
exclude transactions in XSP from the cap. Specifically, it amends 
footnote 22 to provide that all non-facilitation business executed in 
AIM or open outcry, or as a QCC or FLEX transaction, transaction fees 
for Clearing TPH Proprietary and/or their Non-TPH Affiliates in all 
products except XSP, Sector Indexes and Underlying Symbol List A (which 
includes SPX), in the aggregate, are capped at $55,000 per month per 
Clearing TPH. It additionally updates footnote 11 (which is also 
appended to the Clearing TPH Fee Cap table) to provide that the 
Clearing TPH Fee Cap in all products except XSP, Underlying Symbol List 
A and Sector Indexes (the ``Fee Cap''),\4\ among other programs, apply 
to (i) Clearing TPH proprietary orders (``F'' capacity code), and (ii) 
orders of Non-TPH Affiliates of a Clearing TPH. The Exchange notes that 
the proposed change is consistent with the manner in which Firm 
transaction fees in SPX are also excluded from the Clearing TPH Fee 
Cap.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Underlying Symbol List A includes OEX, XEO, RUT, RLG, RLV, 
RUI, UKXM, SPX (includes SPXW), SPESG and VIX.
    \4\ The Exchange notes that it also corrects an error in 
footnote 11 by moving the abbreviated definition for the Clearing 
TPH Fee Cap (``Fee Cap''), to the end of the clause describing the 
cap.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange next proposes to amend and adopt a fee code for 
Customer orders (capacity ``C'') in XSP. Specifically, the Exchange 
proposes to amend CC, which is currently appended to all Customer 
orders in XSP and assesses a fee of $0.04 per contract, to apply to all 
Customer orders in XSP that are for greater than or equal to 10 
contracts (the current fee assessed will remain the same for orders of 
those size), and proposes to adopt fee code XC, appended to all 
Customer orders in XSP that are for less than 10 contract and assesses 
no charge to orders of those size. The Exchange notes that a separate 
fee assessed for Customer orders containing up to a certain number of 
contracts is consistent with the manner in which the Exchange currently 
assesses Customer orders in ETF and ETN options.\5\ Also, in light of 
this proposed change, the Exchange updates footnote 9, the purpose of 
which is to prevent firms from dividing orders into multiple orders of 
less than 100

[[Page 73535]]

contracts in ETN and ETF options for purposes of qualifying for the fee 
waiver and avoiding transaction fees. Specifically, the Exchange amends 
footnote 9 to provide (as it similarly does in connection with ETF/ETN 
transaction fees) that transaction fees are waived for all customer 
orders that are of less than 10 contracts in XSP options, that 
transaction fees will be assessed on all customer orders that are of 10 
contracts or more in XSP options, and that the Exchange will charge any 
leg of a complex order in XSP options that equals or exceeds 10 
contracts, even if the leg is only partially executed below the 10 
contract threshold.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Cboe U.S. Options Fee Schedules, Fees Codes and 
Associated Fees, which provides that fee code CA is appended to 
Customer orders for greater than or equal to 100 contracts that 
remove liquidity in ETF [sic] options and are assessed a fee of 
$0.18, and that fee code CD is appended to Customer orders for less 
than 100 contracts that remove liquidity in ETF [sic] options and 
are assessed no fee.
    \6\ The Exchange also specifies which provisions apply 
specifically to fees for ETF and ETN options throughout footnote 9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to update its routing fees in connection 
with Customer orders in XSP. The Exchange currently assesses routing 
fees that combine the cost of the away market transaction fees, the 
transaction fees applicable on the Exchange plus a standard $0.15 per 
contract routing charge.\7\ Additionally, the Exchange currently waives 
the away market fee and the $0.15 charge for Customer orders that were 
originally transmitted to the Exchange from the trading floor through 
an Exchange[hyphen]sponsored terminal.\8\ The Exchange notes that XSP 
is a proprietary product which is traded exclusively on the Exchange 
and, beginning on November 2, 2020, the Exchange's affiliated options 
exchange, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX Options'') will also begin 
listing and trading XSP.\9\ BZX Options plans to submit a proposal to 
update its fees schedule to reflect fees for orders in XSP, effective 
November 2, 2020. In light of the proposed fee codes for Customer 
orders in XSP on the Exchange (as described above) and the fees being 
implemented for orders in XSP executed on BZX Options, the Exchange 
proposes to update its routing fees for orders in XSP in the Routing 
Fees table, as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87873 (December 31, 
2019), 85 FR 754 (January 7, 2020) (SR-CBOE-2019-127), which 
explains that Cboe Options combines away market transaction fees, 
applicable transaction fees on Cboe Options and a $0.15 routing 
charge for routed orders.
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88243 (February 19, 
2020), 85 FR 10760 (February 25, 2020) (SR-CBOE-2020-011), which 
explains that the Exchange does not pass through or otherwise charge 
customer orders (of any size) routed to other exchanges that were 
originally transmitted to the Exchange from the trading floor 
through an Exchange[hyphen]sponsored terminal (e.g., a PULSe 
Workstation).
    \9\ The Exchange notes that, on November 2, 2020, BZX Options 
plans to begin listing and trading XSP options and the Exchange's 
affiliated options exchange, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``EDGX 
Options''), plans to delist XSP options. The Exchange's affiliated 
options exchange, Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc. (``C2''), may list and 
trade XSP options but does not currently do so.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Amends fee code RX, which is appended to routed Customer 
orders in XSP and assesses a fee of $0.19, to be appended to routed 
Customer orders in XSP for 10 contracts or more and asseses a fee of 
$0.69;
     Adopts fee code RY, appended to routed Customer orders in 
XSP for less than 10 contracts and assesses a fee of $0.65;
     Amends fee code TX, which is appended to routed Customer 
orders in XSP originating on an Exchange-sponsored terminal and 
assesses a fee of $0.04, to be appended to routed Customer orders in 
XSP for 10 contracts or more originating on an Exchange-sponsored 
terminal (the current rate does not change); and
     Adopts fee code TY, appended to routed Customer orders in 
XSP for less than 10 contracts originating on an Exchange-sponsored 
terminal and assesses no charge.
    The Exchange notes that the proposed routing fees for Customer 
orders in XSP are consistent with the manner in which the Exchange 
calculates its routing fees, including the manner in which it waives 
the away market fees and $0.15 routing fee for orders originating on an 
Exchange-sponsored terminal (i.e., applicable to orders yielding fee 
codes TY and TX). For example, the proposed routing fee for orders 
yielding fee code RX is a combination of the $0.50 transaction fee for 
Customer orders on BZX Options, the $0.04 transaction fee for Customer 
orders (for over 10 contracts, as proposed) on the Exchange and the 
$0.15 additional routing fee.
    Finally, the Exchange proposes to amend the SCORe Program and the 
Marketing Fee Program in connection with transactions in XSP. First, 
the Exchange proposes to remove XSP from eligibility under the SCORe 
Program. The SCORe Program is a discount program for Retail, Non-FLEX 
Customer (``C'' origin code) volume in SPX (including SPXW), VIX, RUT, 
MXEA, MXEF & XSP (``Qualifying Classes''), and is available to any TPH 
Originating Clearing Firm or non-TPH Originating Clearing Firm that 
sign up for the program. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to remove 
XSP from the list of Qualifying Classes under the SCORe Program table, 
as well as from the list of SCORe Program Qualifying Classes provided 
in footnote 48. The Exchange next proposes to add XSP to the Marketing 
Fee Program. Currently, the Marketing Fee is assessed on transactions 
of Market-Makers, resulting from customer orders at the per contract 
rate provided above on all classes of equity options, options on ETFs, 
options on ETNs and index options, except that the marketing fee shall 
not apply to Sector Indexes, DJX, MXEA, MXEF, XSP or Underlying Symbol 
List A. A Designated Primary Market-Maker (``DPM''), a ``Preferred 
Market[hyphen]Maker (``PMM''), or a Lead Market-Maker (``LMM'') 
(collectively ``Preferenced Market[hyphen]Maker'') are given access to 
the marketing fee funds generated from a Preferenced order. The funds 
collected via this Marketing Fee are then put into pools controlled by 
the Preferenced Market-Maker. The Preferenced Market-Maker controlling 
a certain pool of funds can then determine the order flow provider(s) 
to which the funds should be directed in order to encourage such order 
flow provider(s) to send orders to the Exchange. Each month, 
undisbursed marketing fees in excess of $250,000 are reimbursed to the 
Market-Makers that contributed to the pool based upon a one month look 
back and their pro-rata portion of the entire amount of marketing fee 
collected during that month. The Exchange proposes to remove XSP from 
the list of options classes in the Marketing Fee table to which the 
Marketing Fee does not apply and add it to the Marketing Fee table to 
be assessed a $0.25 collection per contract, which is the current 
collection fee for Penny Program classes.\10\ Because not all Firms are 
registered for the SCORe Program, the Exchange believes that removing 
XSP from SCORe Program eligibility and, instead, adding it as eligible 
for the Marketing Fee Program (which automatically applies) would 
potentially generate more customer order flow in XSP by providing 
incentive to Market-Makers to submit Customer orders in XSP in order to 
then receive reimbursement for such orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The Exchange also updates ``Penny Pilot'' in the Marketing 
Fees table to state ``Penny Program'' as the Exchange recently 
adopted the program on a permanent basis. See Securities Exchange 
Act Release No. 89075 (June 16, 2020), 85 FR 37479 (June 22, 2020) 
(SR-CBOE-2020-054).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,\11\ in general, and 
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4),\12\ in particular, as it is 
designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, 
fees and other charges among its Members and issuers and other persons 
using its facilities. The Exchange also believes

[[Page 73536]]

that the proposed rule change is consistent with the objectives of 
Section 6(b)(5) \13\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be 
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to 
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation 
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, 
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating 
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, 
in general, to protect investors and the public interest, and, 
particularly, is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between 
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed amendments to the Fees 
Schedule are reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory. 
Specifically, the Exchange believes that it is reasonable to assess 
fees for Market-Maker (MX), Firm (XF), and Non-Customer (XB) orders in 
XSP that reflect approximately 1/10 of the transactions fees assessed 
for corresponding orders in SPX because of the relation between XSP 
options and SPX options, wherein XSP options overlie an index 1/10 the 
value of the index that underlies SPX options. Additionally, the 
Exchange believes it is reasonable to exclude XSP from the Complex 
Surcharge and to apply the standard transaction fees for XSP orders in 
lieu of the AIM Contra fee because these proposed rule changes will 
likewise provide consistency between the fees assessed for orders in 
XSP and SPX, in that, the proposed fees for XSP will remain 
approximately 1/10 the fees for SPX. The Exchange notes too that it is 
reasonable to exclude Firm Orders in XSP from the Clearing TPH Fee Cap 
because fee code FA and FD, orders of which are eligible for the 
Clearing TPH Fee Cap, will no longer be applicable to Firm orders in 
XSP as a result of the new fee code XF, and resulting fee of $0.06, 
applicable to all Firm orders in XSP. The Exchange notes that the 
proposed change is consistent with the manner in which Firm transaction 
fees in SPX are currently excluded from the Clearing TPH Fee Cap. The 
Exchange believes that the proposed fees for Market-Maker, Firm and 
Non-Customer orders are equitable and not unfairly discriminatory 
because the proposed fee codes will apply automatically and uniformly 
to all Market-Maker, Firm and Non-Customer orders, respectively, in 
XSP. Likewise, all such orders in XSP per respective market participant 
will be equally excluded from the Complex Surcharge, AIM Contra fee and 
Clearing TPH Fee Cap, which will provide additional consistency with 
the corresponding transaction fees assessed for market participants' 
orders in SPX.
    The Exchange also believes that the proposed fee codes for Customer 
orders in XSP are reasonable because applying a fee waiver for Customer 
orders for less than 10 contracts is reasonably designed to encourage 
Customer order flow in XSP options. The Exchange believes that 
increased Customer order flow benefits all market participants because 
it attracts liquidity to the Exchange by providing more trading 
opportunities. This, in turn, attracts Market-Makers, signaling 
additional corresponding increase in order flow from other market 
participants, and, as a result, contributing towards a robust, well-
balanced market ecosystem. The Exchange also believes that the waiver 
of fees for Customer orders that are less than a specified number of 
contracts is reasonable because it is consistent with fees currently in 
place for Customer orders in ETF options (including the same 
preventative measures regarding the breaking up of orders in footnote 
9).\14\ Additionally, the Exchange believes that the proposed routing 
fees for Customer orders in XSP are reasonable because they represent 
an approximation of the anticipated cost to the Exchange for routing 
orders to BZX Options and is consistent with the manner in which fee 
codes for routed Customer orders are currently calculated \15\ 
(including the waiver for those Customer orders originating on an 
Exchange-sponsored terminal),\16\ and provided for, in the Fees 
Schedule.\17\ The Exchange notes too that routing through the Exchange 
is voluntary. The Exchange believes that the proposed transaction fees 
and routing fees for Customer orders in XSP are equitable and not 
unfairly discriminatory because they will apply automatically and 
uniformly to all qualifying (that is, routed, greater than or equal to 
10 contracts, etc.) Customer orders. Further, the Exchange believes 
that it is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to provide a lower 
transaction and routing rate for Customer orders because, as described 
above, Customer liquidity benefits all market participants by providing 
more execution opportunities, in turn, attracting Market Maker order 
flow, which ultimately enhances market quality on the Exchange to the 
benefit of all market participants. The Exchange also notes that the 
options industry has a long history of providing preferential pricing 
to Customers, and the Exchange's current fees schedule currently does 
so in many places, as do the fees structures of multiple other 
exchanges.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See supra note 5.
    \15\ See supra note 7.
    \16\ See supra note 8.
    \17\ See generally Cboe Options Fees Schedule, Routing Fees 
table; see also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87873 (December 
31, 2019), 85 FR 754 (January 7, 2020) (SR-CBOE-2019-127), which 
provides explanation of the exchange's combined calculation of 
transaction fees for routed orders.
    \18\ See e.g., NYSE American Options Fee Schedule, Section I.A, 
Options Transaction Fees and Credits: Rates for Options 
transactions; and MIAX Options Fee Schedule, Section (b)(1), 
Proprietary Products Exchange Fees: SPIKES, each of which assesses a 
lower transaction fee for customer orders than that of other market 
participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Lastly, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change to 
remove transactions in XSP from eligibility under the SCORe Program and 
add transactions in XSP to, instead, apply under the Marketing Fees 
Program, is reasonable because not all Firms are registered for the 
SCORe Program. Therefore, removing XSP from SCORe Program eligibility 
and, instead, adding it as eligible for the Marketing Fee Program 
(which automatically applies to all options unless specifically 
excluded, as XSP currently is) is reasonably designed to generate more 
customer order flow in XSP by providing incentive to Market-Makers to 
submit Customer orders in XSP in order to ultimately receive 
reimbursement for such orders. The proposed rule change is reasonable 
in that it redirects Exchange resources and funding from the SCORe 
Program into the Marketing Fee Program in order to increase incentive 
for customer order flow providers to submit customer order flow in XSP, 
which, as indicated above, tends to signal an increase in overall 
market activity, contributing to deeper, more liquid markets and a 
robust market ecosystem that benefits all market participants. The 
Exchange believes that assessing a collection fee of $0.25 for XSP 
orders in the Marketing Fee Program is reasonable because it is the 
same collection fee assessed for Pilot Program classes, which, like 
XSP, trade in penny increments. The Exchange believes the proposed rule 
change is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the 
proposed rule change will apply equally to all applicable transactions 
in XSP, in that, all Firm orders in XSP will, uniformly, not be 
eligible for the SCORe program and all Market-Maker orders in XSP will 
be uniformly assessed under, and

[[Page 73537]]

otherwise a part of, the Marketing Fee Program.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange believes the proposed amendments to its Fee Schedule 
will not impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange 
does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden 
on intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the XSP transaction and 
routing fee amounts for each separate type of market participant will 
be assessed automatically and uniformly to all such market 
participants, i.e., all qualifying (that is, routed, greater than or 
equal to 10 contracts, etc.). Customer orders in XSP will be assessed 
the same amount, all Market-Maker orders in XSP will be assessed the 
same amount, and so on. While lower fees are assessed to Customers, 
Customer order flow, importantly, provides increased trading 
opportunities signaling additional liquidity and ultimately enhancing 
overall market quality. As noted above, preferential pricing to 
Customers is a long-standing options industry practice. In addition to 
this, the proposed rule change to remove XSP from the SCORe Program and 
add it to the Marketing Fee Program will apply equally to all 
applicable transactions in XSP, in that, all Firm orders in XSP will, 
uniformly, not be eligible for the SCORe program and all Market-Maker 
orders in XSP will be uniformly assessed under, and otherwise a part 
of, the Marketing Fee Program (as almost all other options trading on 
the Exchange are). Overall, the proposed rule change is designed to 
increase incentive for customer order flow providers to submit customer 
order flow in XSP, which, as indicated above, contributes to a more 
robust market ecosystem to the benefit of all market participants.
    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the 
propose fees assessed and rebates offered apply to an Exchange 
proprietary product, which are traded exclusively on the Exchange and 
the Exchange's affiliated options exchange, BZX Options.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit, 
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received 
any written comments from members or other interested parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \19\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \20\ 
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed 
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or 
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \20\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-CBOE-2020-108 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2020-108. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments 
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are 
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying 
information from comment submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2020-108 and should be submitted on 
or before December 9, 2020.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-25385 Filed 11-17-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P