Document ID: EPA-R08-OAR-2005-MT-0002-0001
Agency: epa
Document Type: Rule
Title: Federal Register Notice. Direct Final Rule. Revisions to the Emergency Episode Avoidance Plan.
Posted Date: 2006-01-03T14:22:49Z

[Federal Register: January 3, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 1)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 19-21]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr03ja06-7]                         

[[Page 19]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R08-OAR-2005-MT-0002, FRL-8012-8]

 
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Montana; Revisions to the Emergency Episode Avoidance Plan; Direct 
Final Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action approving State 
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of Montana 
on August 2, 2004. The revisions are to the State's Emergency Episode 
Avoidance Plan (EEAP). The intended effect of this action is to make 
federally enforceable those provisions that EPA is approving. This 
action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act.

DATES: This rule is effective on March 6, 2006, without further notice, 
unless EPA receives adverse comment by February 2, 2006. If adverse 
comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct 
final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule 
will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R08-
OAR-2005-MT-0002 by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for 

submitting comments.
     E-mail: long.richard@epa.gov and ostrand.laurie@epa.gov.

     Fax: (303) 312-6064 (please alert the individual listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing comments).
     Mail: Richard R. Long, Director, Air and Radiation 
Program, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P-
AR, 999 18th Street, Suite 200, Denver, Colorado 80202-2466.
     Hand Delivery: Richard R. Long, Director, Air and 
Radiation Program, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, 
Mailcode 8P-AR, 999 18th Street, Suite 300, Denver, Colorado 80202-
2466. Such deliveries are only accepted Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. 
to 4:55 p.m., excluding federal holidays. Special arrangements should 
be made for deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R08-OAR-
2005-MT-0002. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be 
included in the public docket without change and may be made available 
online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information 

provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you 
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov 

or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' 

system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact 
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you 
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA, without going through 
http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket 
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic 
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact 
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you 
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties 
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to 
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special 
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or 
viruses. For additional information about EPA's public docket visit the 
EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

For additional instructions on submitting comments, go to Section I. 
General Information of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this 
document.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the 
http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information 
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such 
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy 
form. Publicly available docket materials are available either 
electronically in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air and 

Radiation Program, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, 999 
18th Street, Suite 300, Denver, Colorado 80202-2466. EPA requests that 
if at all possible, you contact the individual listed in the FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to view the hard copy of the 
docket. You may view the hard copy of the docket Monday through Friday, 
8 a.m. to 4 p.m., excluding federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurie Ostrand, Air and Radiation 
Program, Mailcode 8P-AR, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 
8, 999 18th Street, Suite 200, Denver, Colorado 80202-2466, (303) 312-
6437, ostrand.laurie@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. General Information
II. Background
III. EPA's Review of the State of Montana's August 2, 2004 submittal
IV. Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

Definitions

    For the purpose of this document, we are giving meaning to certain 
words or initials as follows:
    (i) The words or initials Act or CAA mean or refer to the Clean Air 
Act, unless the context indicates otherwise.
    (ii) The words EPA, we, or our mean or refer to the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency.
    (iii) The initials SIP mean or refer to State Implementation Plan.
    (iv) The words State or Montana mean the State of Montana, unless 
the context indicates otherwise.

I. General Information

A. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through 
http://www.regulations.gov or el-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the 

information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or 
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as 
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the 
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as 
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information 
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion to the public docket. 
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with 
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments, 
remember to:
    a. Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying 
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    b. Follow directions--The agency may ask you to respond to specific 
questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR) part of section number.
    c. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and 
substitute language for your requested changes.

[[Page 20]]

    d. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information 
and/or data that you used.
    e. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you 
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be 
reproduced.
    f. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and 
suggest alternatives.
    g. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of 
profanity or personal threats.
    h. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline 
identified.

II. Background

    On August 2, 2004, the Governor submitted a SIP revision that 
contains amendments to the Montana Emergency Episode Avoidance Plan 
(EEAP). The EEAP fulfills the requirements of 40 CFR part 51, subpart H 
which requires a plan to prevent ambient concentrations of air 
pollutants from reaching levels that may endanger public health and 
welfare.

III. EPA's Review of the State of Montana's August 25, 2004 Submittal

    The August 2, 2004 revisions to Montana's EEAP are substantive and 
administrative in nature. The substantive changes are in the priority 
classification of Air Quality Control Regions (AQCRs). Priority 
classifications are based on recent ambient concentrations. In the 
August 2004 EEAP submittal, Montana used the three most recent years of 
ambient data (2000, 2001 and 2002) to revise the priority 
classification of all AQCRs to priority III for all pollutants (sulfur 
dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), particulate matter (PM-
10) nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O3)). 
Previously the Helena and Missoula AQCR were classified as priority II 
for particulate matter (PM-10) and the remainder of the state was 
classified as Priority III for SO2, CO, PM-10, 
NO2 and O3.
    It should be noted that Montana experienced exceedences of the PM-
10 NAAQS in 2000. These exceedences were caused by natural events 
(wildfires) and Montana has not included these exceedence values for 
purposes of determining priority classifications for the state. We 
believe it is acceptable for Montana to not include the data from the 
natural events for two reasons. First, Montana has an EPA-approved 
Natural Events Action Plan (NEAP) to address ambient air quality 
problems caused by wildfires. Second, Montana is retaining its 
Emergency Episode Action Stages for SO2, PM-10 and CO 
because areas in the state have previously been classified as Priority 
I or II for these pollutants.
    Montana has also made administrative changes to the EEAP. We 
believe the administrative changes are not substantive. Some of the 
administrative changes clarify aspects of the plan and others are 
changes in writing style.

IV. Final Action

    EPA is approving Montana's Emergency Episode Avoidance Plan 
submitted on August 2, 2004.
    EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the 
Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no 
adverse comments; we are merely approving administrative changes to 
Montana's air rules. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of 
today's Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate 
document that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision if 
adverse comments are filed. This rule will be effective March 6, 2006, 
without further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments by 
February 2, 2006. If the EPA receives adverse comments, EPA will 
publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the 
public that the rule will not take effect. EPA will address all public 
comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA 
will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties 
interested in commenting must do so at this time. Please note that if 
EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of 
this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of 
the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are 
not the subject of an adverse comment.
    Section 110(l) of the Clean Air Act states that a SIP revision 
cannot be approved if the revision would interfere with any applicable 
requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress 
towards attainment of the NAAQS or any other applicable requirements of 
the Act. The Montana SIP revision that is the subject of this document 
does not interfere with the maintenance of the NAAQS or any other 
applicable requirement of the Act. The August 2, 2004 submittal is a 
plan to prevent ambient concentrations of air pollutants from reaching 
levels that may endanger public health and welfare. Therefore, section 
110(l) requirements are satisfied.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this 
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not 
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this 
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, 
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action 
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes 
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. 
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because 
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does 
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by 
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
    This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will 
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on 
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism 
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the 
States, on the relationship between the national government and the 
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule 
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or 
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean 
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically 
significant.
    In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In 
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the 
State to use voluntary consensus

[[Page 21]]

standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP submission 
for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable 
law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in place of a 
SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air 
Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology 
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. 
This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et 
seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 6, 2006. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings 
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen 
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: December 7, 2005.
Kerrigan G. Clough,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8.

0
40 CFR part 52 is amended to read as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart BB--Montana

0
2. Section 52.1371 is amended by revising the introductory text and 
revising the entries ``Helena Intrastate AQCR 142'' and ``Missoula 
Intrastate AQCR 144'' in the table to read as follows:

Sec.  52.1371  Classification of regions.

    The Montana Emergency Episode Avoidance Plan was revised with an 
August 2, 2004 submittal by the Governor. The August 2, 2004 Emergency 
Episode Avoidance Plan classified the Air Quality Control Regions 
(AQCR) as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Pollutant
   Air quality control regions   -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (AQCR)                 Particulate                      Nitrogen         Carbon
                                      matter       Sulfur  oxide      dioxide        monoxide          Ozone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
Helena Intrastate AQCR 142......             III             III             III             III             III

                                                  * * * * * * *
Missoula Intrastate AQCR 144....             III             III             III             III             III
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 05-24366 Filed 12-30-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P