Document ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0038-0022
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2006-08-30T04:00Z

Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
1
of
36
UNITED
STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
WASHINGTON,
D.
C.
20460
OFFICE
OF
PREVENTION,
PESTICIDE
AND
TOXIC
SUBSTANCES
MEMORANDUM
Date:
July
6,
2006
Subject:
Triadimefon:
Revised
Acute,
Probabilistic
and
Chronic
Dietary
(
Food
+
Drinking
Water)
Exposure
and
Risk
Assessments
for
the
Triadimefon
Reregistration.

DP
Barcode:
D314778
PC
Code:
109901
40
CFR
§
:
180.410
Chemical
Class:
Azole
From:
Yvonne
Barnes,
Chemist
Reregistration
Branch
II
and
Sheila
Piper,
Chemist
Chemistry
and
Exposure
Branch
Health
Effects
Division
(
7509P)

Through:
Douglas
Dotson,
Chemist
Dietary
Exposure
Science
Advisory
Council
(
DESAC)
Health
Effects
Division
(
7509P)
and
Alan
Nielsen,
Branch
Senior
Scientist
William
J.
Hazel,
Branch
Chief
Reregistration
Branch
II
Health
Effects
Division
(
7509P)

To:
Richard
Griffin,
Risk
Assessor
Reregistration
Branch
II
Health
Effects
Division
(
7509P)
and
John
Pates,
Chemical
Review
Manager
Reregistration
Branch
I
Special
Review
and
Reregistration
Division
(
7508P)
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
2
of
36
Executive
Summary
Revised
acute
and
chronic
dietary
(
food
and
water)
exposure
and
risk
assessments
were
conducted
using
the
Dietary
Exposure
Evaluation
Model
software
with
the
Food
Commodity
Intake
Database
(
DEEM­
FCID
 
,
Version
2.03),
which
uses
food
consumption
data
from
the
U.
S.
Department
of
Agriculture's
Continuing
Surveys
of
Food
Intakes
by
Individuals
(
CSFII)
from
1994­
1996
and
1998.
The
analyses
were
performed
as
part
of
the
registrant,
Bayer
CropScience's
acute
and
chronic
dietary
assessment
(
A.
M.
Bloomberg,
5­
MAY­
2006,
ID#
201513)
for
triadimefon
and
response
to
Bayer's
comments
will
be
addressed
in
a
separate
memo.
This
dietary
exposure
and
risk
assessments
for
triadimefon
include
the
following:
the
latest
monitoring
data
for
pears,
pineapples
and
raspberries,
and
new
drinking
water
scenarios
provided
by
the
Environmental
Fate
and
Effects
Division
(
EFED).

Acute
Dietary
Exposure
Results
and
Characterization
of
Input
Data
A
highly
refined
probabilistic
acute
dietary
exposure
assessment
was
conducted
to
estimate
the
dietary
risks
associated
with
the
reregistration
of
triadimefon.
The
acute
dietary
exposure
assessment
incorporated
processing
factors
and
percent
crop
treated
(%
CT)
estimates
provided
by
the
Biological
and
Economic
Analysis
Division
(
BEAD).
The
anticipated
residue
(
AR)
estimates
are
based
primarily
on
monitoring
data.
However,
because
monitoring
data
did
not
analyzed
for
all
triadimefon
metabolites,
KWG
1323
and
KWG
1342,
the
ratios
of
total
toxic
residues
(
TTR)
to
triadimefon
from
available
metabolism
studies
was
used
to
estimate
the
total
residues
of
concern.
The
sum
of
triadimefon
and
triadimenol
was
multiplied
by
the
ratio
1.25
to
account
for
metabolites,
KWG
1323
and
KWG
1342.
The
assessment
includes
surface
water
numbers
from
Florida
turf
(
tees/
greens;
tees/
greens/
fairways;
fairways
only;
and
entire
course)
numbers
and
golf
course
adjustment
factors
(
GCAFs)
were
applied
to
surface
water.

Food
Alone
The
acute
dietary
exposure
estimates
from
food
alone
are
below
HED's
level
of
concern
(<
100
%
aPAD)
at
the
99.9th
percentile
of
exposure.
Triadimefon
dietary
exposure
at
the
99.9th
percentile
from
food
alone
is
15%
of
the
aPAD
for
the
U.
S.
population
and
49%
of
the
aPAD
for
children
1­
2
yrs,
the
most
highly
exposed
population
subgroup.

Food
and
Water
The
acute
dietary
exposure
estimates
from
food
and
drinking
water
using
the
golf
tees
and
greens
applications
for
drinking
water
are
below
HED's
level
of
concern
(<
100%
aPAD)
at
the
99.9th
percentile
of
exposure.
Triadimefon
dietary
exposure
at
the
99.9th
percentile
from
food
and
drinking
water
is
32%
of
the
aPAD
for
the
U.
S.
population
and
73%
of
the
aPAD
for
all
infants
(<
1
yr),
the
most
highly
exposed
population
subgroup.

Chronic
Dietary
Exposure
Results
and
Characterization
of
Input
Data
A
highly
refined
chronic
dietary
exposure
assessment
was
conducted
to
estimate
the
dietary
risks
associated
with
the
reregistration
of
triadimefon.
The
chronic
dietary
exposure
assessment
incorporated
percent
crop
treated
(%
CT)
estimates
provided
by
BEAD
and
processing
factors.
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
3
of
36
The
AR
estimates
are
based
primarily
on
PDP
data.
However,
because
PDP
did
not
analyze
for
all
triadimefon
metabolites
of
concern,
the
ratio
of
TTR
to
triadimefon
from
available
metabolism
studies
was
used
to
estimate
the
total
residues
of
concern.
The
assessment
included
the
1
in
10
year
annual
mean
surface
water
numbers
from
Florida
turf
(
golf
course)
scenarios
and
(
GCAFs)
applied
to
surface
water.

Food
Alone
The
chronic
dietary
exposure
to
triadimefon
from
food
alone
is
below
HED's
level
of
concern
(<
100%
of
the
cPAD)
for
the
U.
S.
population
(<
1%
of
cPAD)
and
children
1­
2
yrs
(
3%
of
the
cPAD),
the
most
highly
exposed
population
subgroup.

Food
and
Water
The
chronic
dietary
exposure
estimates
from
food
and
drinking
water
using
the
worst­
case
(
entire
golf
course)
application
1
in
10
year
annual
concentration
are
below
HED's
level
of
concern
(<
100%
cPAD)
for
the
U.
S.
population
and
all
population
subgroups.
Triadimefon
dietary
exposure
from
food
and
drinking
water
for
the
U.
S.
population
is
14%
of
the
cPAD
and
46%
of
the
cPAD
for
all
infants
(<
1
yr),
the
most
highly
exposed
population
subgroup.

Cancer
Dietary
Exposure
Results
and
Characterization
Triadimefon
is
classified
as
Category
C
"
possible
human
carcinogen."
No
Q1*
has
been
derived.

I.
Introduction
Dietary
risk
assessment
incorporates
both
exposure
and
toxicity
of
a
given
pesticide.
For
acute
and
chronic
assessments,
the
risk
is
expressed
as
a
percentage
of
a
maximum
acceptable
dose
(
i.
e.,
the
dose
which
the
Health
Effects
Division
has
concluded
will
result
in
no
unreasonable
adverse
health
effects).
This
dose
is
referred
to
as
the
population
adjusted
dose
(
PAD).
The
PAD
is
equivalent
to
the
Reference
Dose
(
RfD)
divided
by
the
special
FQPA
Safety
Factor.

For
acute
and
non­
cancer
chronic
exposures,
HED
is
concerned
when
estimated
dietary
risk
exceeds
100%
of
the
PAD.
References
which
discuss
the
acute
and
chronic
dietary
risk
assessments
in
more
detail
are
available
on
the
EPA
pesticides
web
site:
"
Available
Information
on
Assessing
Exposure
from
Pesticides,
A
User's
Guide,"
6/
21/
2000,
web
link:
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
fedrgstr/
EPA­
PEST/
2000/
July/
Day­
12/
6061.
pdf;
or
see
SOP
99.6
(
8/
20/
1999).

The
most
recent
dietary
risk
assessment
for
triadimefon
was
conducted
by
S.
Ary
(
DP
Barcode
D314778,
23­
NOV­
2005).

II.
Residue
Information
Tolerances
are
established
for
residues
of
triadimefon
[
1­(
4­
chlorophenoxy)­
3,3­
dimethyl­
1­(
1H­
1,2,4­
triazol­
1­
yl)­
2­
butanone]
and
its
metabolites
containing
chlorophenoxy
and
triazole
moieties
(
expressed
as
the
parent
compound)
in/
on
various
plant
and
animal
commodities
[
40
CFR
§
180.410].
A
tolerance
with
regional
registration
is
established
for
triadimefon
and
its
metabolites
in
raspberries
at
2.0
ppm
[
40
CFR
§
180.410(
c)].
Triadimefon
is
a
systemic
fungicide
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
4
of
36
used
to
control
rust
and
mildew
on
apples,
grapes,
pears,
pineapple,
and
raspberries.
The
available
crop
field
trials
reflecting
use
of
registered
formulations
at
1x
the
maximum
label
rate
show
finite
residues
of
triadimefon
and
its
metabolites
triadimenol,
KWG
1342,
and
KWG
1323
in/
on
apples,
grapes,
pears,
and
pineapples
and
triadimefon
and
triadimenol
in/
on
raspberries.

The
qualitative
nature
of
triadimefon
residues
in
plants
is
understood
based
on
the
adequate
metabolism
studies
conducted
with
grapes,
cucumbers,
tomatoes,
and
wheat.
The
Health
Effects
Division
(
HED)
Metabolism
Assessment
Review
Committee
(
MARC)
has
determined
that
the
residues
of
concern
in
plants
are
triadimefon,
triadimenol,
KWG
1323,
KWG
1342,
and,
in
wheat
only,
KWG
1732
(
S.
Knizner,
HED
MARC
memorandum,
1/
3/
1994).
HED
determined
that
only
triadimefon
and
triadimenol
in
drinking
water
should
be
considered
in
the
dietary
risk
assessment.
Triadimefon
is
not
registered
for
use
as
a
direct
livestock
treatment
and
residues
of
triadimefon
are
not
expected
to
be
detected
in
the
feed
items.
HED
concluded
that
the
supported
uses
on
apples,
grapes,
pears,
pineapples,
and
raspberries
result
in
a
40
CFR
§
180.6(
a)(
3)
situation
for
ruminant
commodities;
i.
e.,
there
is
no
reasonable
expectation
of
finite
residues
in
ruminant
commodities.
Therefore,
tolerances
in
animal
commodities
are
not
required
at
the
present
time.

Residue
Data
used
for
Acute
and
Chronic
Dietary
Assessments
The
anticipated
residue
estimates
are
based
primarily
on
monitoring
data.
However,
because
PDP
and
FDA
did
not
analyze
for
all
triadimefon
metabolites
of
concern,
the
ratios
of
total
toxic
residues
(
TTR)
to
triadimefon
from
available
metabolism
studies
were
used
to
estimate
the
total
residues
of
concern.
All
triadimefon
acute
and
chronic
residue
estimates
for
crop
commodities
are
listed
in
Table
1.
As
stated
above,
the
residues
included
in
risk
assessment
include
three
of
triadimefon's
metabolites:
triadimenol,
KWG
1323,
and
KWG
1342.
The
monitoring
data
only
analyzed
for
triadimefon
and
triadimenol
in
apples,
grapes,
pears,
and
pineapples.
Since
MARC
concluded
that
triadimefon,
triadimenol,
KWG
1323,
and
KWG
1342
are
residues
of
concern,
residue
data
for
these
metabolites
were
needed
for
conducting
a
dietary
risk
assessment.

In
order
to
estimate
the
total
residues
of
triadimefon
and
all
its
metabolites,
the
concentrations
of
triadimefon
and
all
its
metabolites
of
concern
(
termed
Total
Toxic
Residue
or
TTR)
were
used.
The
metabolism
study
conducted
with
grapes
was
used
based
on
the
similarities
of
grapes
to
all
the
supported
crops
and
the
fact
that
it
will
produce
a
more
conservative
assessment
than
using
the
cucumber
or
tomato
metabolism
studies.
To
calculate
the
TRR
in
monitoring
samples,
the
ratio
of
the
TTR
to
triadimefon
and
triadimenol
(
1.25)
from
the
grape
metabolism
study
was
used
along
with
the
reported
triadimefon
and
triadimenol
residues
in
monitoring
samples.
The
sum
of
triadimefon
and
triadimenol
was
multiplied
by
the
ratio
1.25
to
account
for
metabolites,
KWG
1323
and
KWG
1342.

Residue
Estimates
for
Individual
Crops
Apple:
PDP
data
from
2003
were
used
for
apples.
A
total
of
744
samples
were
analyzed
for
triadimefon
and
triadimenol.
Triadimefon
was
not
detected
in
any
samples
and
triadimenol
was
detected
in
14
samples.
The
estimated
maximum
%
CT
for
apples
of
10%
was
used
for
the
acute
dietary
risk
assessment
and
the
estimated
average
%
CT
of
5%
was
used
for
the
chronic
dietary
risk
assessments.
The
ratio
of
TTR/
triadimefon
and
triadimenol
(
1.25)
from
the
grape
metabolism
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
5
of
36
study
was
used
to
estimate
the
total
residues
of
concern
based
on
reported
triadimefon
and
triadimenol
residues
in
monitoring
samples.

Grape:
PDP
data
from
2004
were
used
for
grapes.
A
total
of
738
samples
were
analyzed
for
triadimefon
and
212
samples
were
analyzed
for
triadimenol.
Triadimefon
was
not
detected
in
any
samples
and
triadimenol
was
detected
in
15
samples.
The
estimated
maximum
%
CT
for
grapes
of
5%
was
used
for
the
acute
dietary
risk
assessment
and
the
estimated
average
%
CT
of
1%
was
used
for
the
chronic
dietary
risk
assessments.
The
ratio
of
TTR/
triadimefon
and
triadimenol
(
1.25)
from
the
grape
metabolism
study
was
used
to
estimate
the
total
residues
of
concern
based
on
reported
triadimefon
and
triadimenol
residues
in
monitoring
samples.

Pear:
PDP
data
from
2003
and
2004
were
used
for
pears.
A
total
of
928
samples
were
analyzed
for
triadimefon
and
270
samples
were
analyzed
for
triadimenol.
Triadimefon
and
triadimenol
were
not
detected
in
any
samples.
The
estimated
maximum
%
CT
for
pears
of
5%
was
used
for
the
acute
dietary
risk
assessment
and
the
estimated
average
%
CT
of
5%
was
used
for
the
chronic
dietary
risk
assessments.
The
ratio
of
TTR/
triadimefon
and
triadimenol
(
1.25)
from
the
grape
metabolism
study
was
used
to
estimate
the
total
residues
of
concern
based
on
reported
triadimefon
and
triadimenol
residues
in
monitoring
samples.

Pineapple:
PDP
data
from
2002
was
used
for
pineapples.
A
total
of
360
samples
were
analyzed
for
triadimefon
and
52
samples
were
analyzed
for
triadimenol.
Triadimefon
was
detected
in
16
samples
and
triadimenol
was
detected
in
1
sample.
The
estimated
%
CT
for
pineapples
of
100%
was
used
for
the
acute
and
chronic
dietary
risk
assessments.
The
ratio
of
TTR/
triadimefon
and
triadimenol
(
1.25)
from
the
grape
metabolism
study
was
used
to
estimate
the
total
residues
of
concern
based
on
reported
triadimefon
and
triadimenol
residues
in
monitoring
samples.

Raspberry:
FDA
data
(
1996­
2003)
was
used
for
raspberries.
A
total
of
320
samples
were
analyzed
for
triadimefon
and
triadimenol.
A
total
of
20
samples
contained
triadimefon
and/
or
triadimenol
residues.
The
estimated
maximum
%
CT
for
raspberries
of
50%
was
used
for
the
acute
dietary
risk
assessment
and
the
estimated
average
%
CT
of
50%
was
used
for
the
chronic
dietary
risk
assessments.
The
ratio
of
TTR/
triadimefon
and
triadimenol
(
1.25)
from
the
grape
metabolism
study
was
used
to
estimate
the
total
residues
of
concern
based
on
reported
triadimefon
and
triadimenol
residues
in
monitoring
samples.
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
6
of
36
Table
1:
Triadimefon
Data
and
Residue
Estimates
Used
in
Dietary
Analyses
Anticipated
Residue
Estimates/
Tolerance
RAC
Classification1
Data
Source
Years
No.
of
Samples
No.
of
Detects
%
CT
Avg.
2
%
CT
Max.
2
Processing
Factors3
Acute
(
Tol.,
AR,
RDF)
Chronic
and
Cancer
(
Tol.,
AR)

Apple
NB
or
PB
PDP
(
1.25x
factor)
2003
744
14
5
10
juice
at
0.6
RDF#
1
TOTALZ=
670
TOTALLOD=
60
LODRES=
0.00125
0.008
0.004
8,
0.006
4,
0.003
AR
(
0.00014)

Apple
B
PDP
(
1.25x
factor)
2003
744
14
5
10
dried
at
8.0
RDF#
2
TOTALZ=
0
TOTALLOD=
730
LODRES=
0.00125
0.008
0.004
8,
0.006
4,
0.003
AR
(
0.0013)

Grape
PB
PDP
(
1.25x
factor)
2004
738
15
1
5
raisin
at
4.0
RDF#
3
TOTALZ=
701
TOTALLOD=
22
LODRES=
0.025
0.083
0.916
0.291
0.097
11,
0.049
AR
(
0.027)

Pear
NB
or
PB
PDP
(
1.25x
factor)
2003­
04
928
0
5
5
dried
at
6.25
RDF
#
4
TOTALZ=
882
TOTALLOD=
46
LODRES=
0.025
AR
(
0.001)

Pineapple
NB
or
PB
PDP
(
1.25x
factor)
2002
360
17
100
100
dried
at
5.0
RDF
#
5
TOTALZ=
0
TOTALLOD=
343
LODRES=
0.025
0.47
0.062
15,0.024
AR
(
0.001)

Raspberry
PB
FDA
(
1.25x
factor)
1996­
2003
320
20
50
50
N/
A
RDF
#
6
TOTALZ=
160
TOTALLOD=
140
LODRES=
0.005
0.1225
0.425
2,0.7775
0.244
3,0.1
0.3
0.125
0.189
0.325
0.375
0.0375
0.363
0.238
0.4
1.1
0.638
0.188
AR
(
0.024)

1.
Classification
of
blended
(
B),
partially
blended
(
PB),
not
blended
(
NB).
2.
When
no
data
were
available
for
percent
crop
treated
(%
CT)
average,
100%
CT
was
used
in
the
dietary
assessment.
3.
Processing
study
information
may
be
found
in
the
Chemistry
Review
Document
under
guideline
section
860.1520
Processed
Food
and
Feed
(
S.
Ary,
D314742,
9/
16/
2005).
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
7
of
36
Processing
Factors
Data
from
the
processing
studies
were
used
in
this
assessment
for
several
commodities
along
with
DEEM
7.81
default
processing
factor
for
dried
apple
(
8.0x),
dried
pear
(
6.25x),
and
dried
pineapple
(
5.0x).
Acceptable
processing
studies
are
available
for
apples,
grapes,
and
pineapple.
A
processing
factor
of
0.6x
was
utilized
for
apple
juice
and
4.0x
for
raisin.
All
other
processed
commodities
showed
little
or
no
concentration
in
the
available
processing
studies.
For
detailed
considerations
of
processing
factors
see
"
Triadimefon.
Summary
of
Analytical
Chemistry
and
Residue
Data
for
the
Reregistration
Eligibility
Decision
(
RED)
Document"
under
guideline
section
860.1520
(
S.
Ary,
D314742,
9/
16/
2005).

Usage
Information
Dietary
risk
estimates
are
based,
in
part,
on
estimates
of
the
percent
usage
of
triadimefon
on
apples,
grapes,
pears,
pineapples,
and
raspberries.
BEAD
has
estimated
triadimefon
use
(
J.
Carter,
SLUA,
2­
JUN­
2005)
based
on
available
pesticide
survey
usage
data
for
the
years
1997
to
2003
(
Attachment
22).
BEAD
estimates
are
provided
to
HED
as
an
average
and
as
an
estimated
maximum.
The
estimated
maximum
%
CT
was
used
for
the
acute
dietary
risk
assessment
and
the
estimated
average
%
CT
was
used
for
the
chronic
dietary
risk
assessments.

III.
Drinking
Water
Data
The
drinking
water
values
used
in
the
dietary
risk
assessment
were
provided
by
the
Environmental
Fate
and
Effects
Division
(
EFED)
in
the
following
memorandum:
"
Tier
2
Drinking
Water
Assessment
for
Triadimefon
and
its
Major
Degradate
Triadimenol"
(
J.
Angier,
D316941,
31­
AUG­
2005).
Water
residues
were
incorporated
in
the
DEEM­
FCID
 
into
the
food
categories
"
water,
direct,
all
sources"
and
"
water,
indirect,
all
sources."

The
estimated
drinking
water
concentrations
(
EDWCs)
for
triadimefon
and
triadimenol
were
moderately
refined
and
calculated
using
PRZM
(
Pesticide
Root
Zone
Model)
and
EXAMS
(
Exposure
Analysis
Modeling
System)
for
use
in
the
human
health
risk
assessment.
The
estimated
groundwater
concentrations
for
triadimefon
were
unrefined
and
calculated
using
SCI­
GROW
(
Screening
Concentration
In
Ground
Water);
however,
these
were
not
used
in
the
assessment
because
residues
are
shown
to
be
much
higher
in
surface
water.

In
the
previous
dietary
assessment,
the
EDWCs
were
calculated
from
the
Oregon
Christmas
tree,
Pennsylvania
apple,
and
Florida
turf
scenarios.
A
default
Percent
Cropped
Area
(
PCA)
factor
of
0.87
(
87%)
was
applied
to
all
the
scenarios
except
turf,
for
which
100%
of
area
is
considered
(
no
adjustment).
The
FL
turf
scenario
using
PRZM/
EXAMS
model,
produced
the
highest
concentrations
and
the
acute
and
chronic
dietary
assessments
exceeded
HED's
level
of
concern.

As
requested
by
SRRD,
additional
Florida
turf
(
golf
course)
scenarios
were
estimated
and
golf
course
adjustment
factors
(
GCAFs)
were
applied
(
Table
2).
The
GCAFs
are
meant
to
elucidate
what
the
expected
surface
water
concentrations
would
be
if
only
certain
parts
of
a
golf
course
received
triadimefon
applications
at
turf
use
rates,
rather
than
100%
of
the
area
receiving
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
8
of
36
application.
Explicit
label
changes
would
need
to
be
implemented
before
any
results
from
this
data
set
could
be
considered
applicable
to
a
risk
assessment.

Table
2.
Surface
Water
Concentrations
for
FL
Turf
Scenarios
with
Golf
Course
Adjustment
Factors
Use
Scenario
Portion
of
golf
course
that
is
treated
Acute
(
ppb)
1
in
10
yr
annual
mean
(
ppb)
30
yr
overall
mean
(
ppb)

3
applications
14
day
interval
5.5
lbs
product
(
2
oz/
1000
ft2)
Tees/
greens
Tees/
Greens/
Fairways
Fairways
Entire
course
4.9
33
28.1
97
1.1
7.5
6.4
22
0.75
5.1
4.35
15
IV.
DEEM­
FCID
 
Program
and
Consumption
Information
Triadimefon
acute
and
chronic
dietary
exposure
assessments
were
conducted
using
the
Dietary
Exposure
Evaluation
Model
software
with
the
Food
Commodity
Intake
Database
(
DEEMFCID
 
,
Version
2.03),
which
incorporates
consumption
data
from
USDA's
Continuing
Surveys
of
Food
Intakes
by
Individuals
(
CSFII),
1994­
1996
and
1998.
The
1994­
96,
98
data
are
based
on
the
reported
consumption
of
more
than
20,000
individuals
over
two
non­
consecutive
survey
days.
Foods
"
as
consumed"
(
e.
g.,
apple
pie)
are
linked
to
EPA­
defined
food
commodities
(
e.
g.
apples,
peeled
fruit
­
cooked;
fresh
or
N/
S;
baked;
or
wheat
flour
­
cooked;
fresh
or
N/
S,
baked)
using
publicly
available
recipe
translation
files
developed
jointly
by
USDA/
ARS
and
EPA.
For
chronic
exposure
assessment,
consumption
data
are
averaged
for
the
entire
U.
S.
population
and
within
population
subgroups,
but
for
acute
exposure
assessment
are
retained
as
individual
consumption
events.
Based
on
analysis
of
the
1994­
96,
98
CSFII
consumption
data,
which
took
into
account
dietary
patterns
and
survey
respondents,
HED
concluded
that
it
is
most
appropriate
to
report
risk
for
the
following
population
subgroups:
the
general
U.
S.
population,
all
infants
(
less
than
1
year
old),
children
1­
2,
children
3­
5,
children
6­
12,
youth
13­
19,
adults
20­
49,
females
13­
49,
and
adults
50+
years
old.

For
chronic
dietary
exposure
assessment,
an
estimate
of
the
residue
level
in
each
food
or
foodform
(
e.
g.,
orange
or
orange
juice)
on
the
food
commodity
residue
list
is
multiplied
by
the
average
daily
consumption
estimate
for
that
food/
food
form
to
produce
a
residue
intake
estimate.
The
resulting
residue
intake
estimate
for
each
food/
food
form
is
summed
with
the
residue
intake
estimates
for
all
other
food/
food
forms
on
the
commodity
residue
list
to
arrive
at
the
total
average
estimated
exposure.
Exposure
is
expressed
in
mg/
kg
body
weight/
day
and
as
a
percent
of
the
cPAD.
This
procedure
is
performed
for
each
population
subgroup.

For
acute
exposure
assessments,
individual
one­
day
food
consumption
data
are
used
on
an
individual­
by­
individual
basis.
The
reported
consumption
amounts
of
each
food
item
can
be
multiplied
by
a
residue
point
estimate
and
summed
to
obtain
a
total
daily
pesticide
exposure
for
a
deterministic
exposure
assessment,
or
"
matched"
in
multiple
random
pairings
with
residue
values
and
then
summed
in
a
probabilistic
assessment.
The
resulting
distribution
of
exposures
is
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
9
of
36
expressed
as
a
percentage
of
the
aPAD
on
both
a
user
(
i.
e.,
only
those
who
reported
eating
relevant
commodities/
food
forms)
and
a
per­
capita
(
i.
e.,
those
who
reported
eating
the
relevant
commodities
as
well
as
those
who
did
not)
basis.
In
accordance
with
HED
policy,
per
capita
exposure
and
risk
are
reported
for
all
tiers
of
analysis.
However,
for
tiers
1
and
2,
any
significant
differences
in
user
vs.
per
capita
exposure
and
risk
are
specifically
identified
and
noted
in
the
risk
assessment.

V.
Toxicological
Information
Both
the
acute
and
chronic
exposure
estimates
for
triadimefon
were
evaluated
based
on
a
NOAEL
of
3.4
mg/
kg/
day
from
a
subchronic
neurotoxicity
study
in
rats
(
R.
Griffin,
D325542,
23­
JAN­
2006).
A
summary
of
the
toxicological
doses
and
endpoints
selected
for
the
dietary
exposure
assessments
is
provided
in
Table
3.

Table
3.
Summary
of
Toxicological
Doses
and
Endpoints
for
Triadimefon
Exposure
Scenario
Dose
Used
in
Risk
Assessment,
UF
FQPA
SF
and
Level
of
Concern
for
Risk
Assessment
Study
and
Toxicological
Effects
Acute
Dietary
(
general
population)
NOAEL
=
3.4
mg/
kg/
day
UF
=
1000
Acute
RfD
=
0.0034
mg/
kg/
day
FQPA
SF
=
1X
aPAD
=
acute
RfD
FQPA
SF
aPAD
=
0.0034
mg/
kg/
day
Subchronic
neurotoxicity
study
in
rats.
LOAEL
=
54.6/
68.7
mg/
kg/
day
based
largely
on
hyperactivity.

Chronic
Dietary
(
all
populations)
NOAEL
=
3.4
mg/
kg/
day
UF
=
1000
Chronic
RfD
=
0.0034
mg/
kg/
day
FQPA
SF
=
1X
PAD
=
chronic
RfD
FQPA
SF
cPAD
=
0.0034
mg/
kg/
day
Subchronic
neurotoxicity
study
in
rats.
LOAEL
=
54.6/
68.7
mg/
kg/
day
based
largely
on
hyperactivity.

Cancer
(
oral,
dermal,
inhalation)
Classification:
Category
C
"
possible
human
carcinogen"
based
on
statistically
significant
increase
in
thyroid
adenomas
in
male
Wistar
rats
and
statistically
significant
increases
in
hepatocellular
adenomas
in
both
sexes
of
the
NMRI
mouse.

UF
=
uncertainty
factor,
FQPA
SF
=
FQPA
safety
factor,
NOAEL
=
no
observed
adverse
effect
level,
LOAEL
=
lowest
observed
adverse
effect
level,
PAD
=
population
adjusted
dose
(
a
=
acute,
c
=
chronic)
RfD
=
reference
dose
VI.
Results/
Discussion
As
stated
above,
for
acute
and
chronic
assessments,
HED
is
concerned
when
dietary
risk
exceeds
100%
of
the
PAD.
The
DEEM­
FCID
 
analyses
estimate
the
dietary
exposure
of
the
U.
S.
population
and
various
population
subgroups.
The
acute
and
chronic
dietary
exposure
analyses
results
reported
in
Tables
4,
6
and
7,
respectively
are
for
the
general
U.
S.
population,
all
infants
(
less
than
1
year
old),
children
1­
2,
children
3­
5,
children
6­
12,
youth
13­
19,
adults
20­
49,
adults
50+
years,
and
females
13­
49.
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
10
of
36
Results
of
Acute
Dietary
Exposure
Analysis
The
acute
dietary
exposure
estimates
from
food
alone
are
below
HED's
level
of
concern
(<
100
%
aPAD)
at
the
99.9th
percentile
of
exposure
(
Table
4).
Triadimefon
dietary
exposure
at
the
99.9th
percentile
from
food
alone
is
15%
of
the
aPAD
for
the
U.
S.
population
and
49%
of
the
aPAD
for
children
1­
2
yrs,
the
most
highly
exposed
population
subgroup.

The
acute
dietary
exposure
estimates
from
combined
food
and
drinking
water
using
the
golf
tees
and
greens
applications
for
drinking
water
are
below
HED's
level
of
concern
(<
100%
aPAD)
at
the
99.9th
percentile
of
exposure
(
Table
5).
Triadimefon
dietary
exposure
at
the
99.9th
percentile
from
food
and
drinking
water
is
32%
of
the
aPAD
for
the
U.
S.
population
and
73%
of
the
aPAD
for
all
infants
(<
1
yr),
the
most
highly
exposed
population
subgroup.

For
comparison,
the
estimated
surface
water
point
estimates
using
a
typical
number
of
3
applications
of
2.75
lbs
ai/
A
were
incorporated
into
the
acute
dietary
exposure
assessment.
For
golf
course
fairways;
tees,
greens
and
fairways;
and
entire
golf
course,
the
acute
dietary
risk
estimates
exceed
HED's
level
of
concern
at
the
99.9th
exposure
percentile
for
the
U.
S.
population
ranging
from
164­
560%
of
the
aPAD
(
see
Table
5).

Table
4.
Results
of
Acute
Dietary
Exposure
Analysis
for
Food
Alone
Using
DEEM­
FCID
95th
Percentile
99th
Percentile
99.9th
Percentile
Population
Subgroup
aPAD
(
mg/
kg/
day)
Exposure
(
mg/
kg/
day)
%
aPAD
Exposure
(
mg/
kg/
day)
%
aPAD
Exposure
(
mg/
kg/
day)
%
aPAD
General
U.
S.
Population
0.0034
0.000014
<
1
0.000097
3
0.000506
15
All
Infants
(<
1
year
old)
0.0034
0.000051
1.5
0.000231
7
0.000717
21
Children
1­
2
years
old
0.0034
0.000109
3
0.000446
13
0.001679
49
Children
3­
5
years
old
0.0034
0.000069
2
0.000268
8
0.001096
32
Children
6­
12
years
old
0.0034
0.000031
<
1
0.000139
4
0.000516
15
Youth
13­
19
years
old
0.0034
0.000005
<
1
0.000060
2
0.000240
7
Adults
20­
49
years
old
0.0034
0.000007
<
1
0.000060
2
0.000351
10
Adults
50+
years
old
0.0034
0.000010
<
1
0.000058
2
0.000275
8
Females
13­
49
year
old
0.0034
0.000007
<
1
0.000068
2
0.000353
10
Table
5.
Triadimefon
Results
of
Acute
Dietary
Exposure
Analysis
(
Food
+
Drinking
Water)
From
a
Variety
of
Gulf
Courses
Scenarios
Using
DEEM­
FCID
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
11
of
36
Table
5.
Triadimefon
Results
of
Acute
Dietary
Exposure
Analysis
(
Food
+
Drinking
Water)
From
a
Variety
of
Gulf
Courses
Scenarios
Using
DEEM­
FCID
Scenario
aPAD
(
mg/
kg/
day)
U.
S.
Population
%
aPAD
All
Infants*
%
aPAD
Children
1­
2
yrs*
%
aPAD
Children
3­
5
yrs*
%
aPAD
Acute
Dietary
Estimates
99.9th
Percentile
1
Tees
and
greens
0.0034
32
73
56
43
2
Fairways
only
0.0034
164
417
175
176
3
Tees,
greens
and
fairways
0.0034
192
492
206
206
4
Entire
golf
course
0.0034
560
1433
596
575
*
Show
only
populations
having
drinking
water
exposure
as
significant
contributors
to
triadimefon
risk
Results
of
Chronic
Dietary
Exposure
Analysis
The
chronic
dietary
exposure
analyses
results
reported
in
Table
6
are
for
the
general
U.
S.
population,
all
infants
(
less
than
1
year
old),
children
1­
2,
children
3­
5,
children
6­
12,
youth
13­
19,
adults
20­
49,
adults
50+
years,
and
females
13­
49.

Food
Alone
The
chronic
dietary
exposure
to
triadimefon
from
food
alone
is
below
HED's
level
of
concern
(<
100%
of
the
cPAD)
for
the
U.
S.
population
(<
1%
of
cPAD)
and
children
1­
2
yrs
(
3%
of
the
cPAD).
The
results
of
the
chronic
dietary
exposure
analysis
are
reported
below
in
Table
6.

The
chronic
dietary
exposure
estimates
from
food
and
drinking
water
using
the
worst­
case
(
entire
golf
course)
application
1
in
10
year
annual
concentration
are
below
HED's
level
of
concern
(<
100%
cPAD)
for
the
U.
S.
population
and
all
population
subgroups.
Triadimefon
dietary
exposure
from
food
and
drinking
water
for
the
U.
S.
population
is
14%
of
the
cPAD
and
46%
of
the
cPAD
for
all
infants
(<
1
yr),
the
most
highly
exposed
population
subgroup.

Cancer
Dietary
Exposure
Results
and
Characterization
Triadimefon
is
classified
as
Category
C
"
possible
human
carcinogen."
No
Q1*
has
been
derived.
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
12
of
36
Table
6.
Results
of
Chronic
Dietary
Exposure
Analysis
from
(
Food
Alone)
and
(
Food
+
Drinking
Water­
Entire
Course)
Using
DEEM­
FCID
Food
Alone
Food
+
Drinking
Water
(
Entire
Course)

Population
Subgroup
cPAD
(
mg/
kg/
day)
Exposure
(
mg/
kg/
day)
%
cPAD
Exposure
(
mg/
kg/
day)
%
cPAD
General
U.
S.
Population
0.0034
0.000017
<
1
0.000480
14
All
Infants
(<
1
year
old)
0.0034
0.000026
<
1
0.001546
46
Children
1­
2
years
old
0.0034
0.000091
3
0.000780
23
Children
3­
5
years
old
0.0034
0.000056
2
0.000701
21
Children
6­
12
years
old
0.0034
0.000021
<
1
0.000466
14
Youth
13­
19
years
old
0.0034
0.000008
<
1
0.000343
10
Adults
20­
49
years
old
0.0034
0.000010
<
1
0.000443
13
Adults
50+
years
old
0.0034
0.000012
<
1
0.000468
14
Females
13­
49
year
old
0.0034
0.000011
<
1
0.000442
13
VII.
Characterization
of
Inputs/
Outputs
The
acute
and
chronic
dietary
exposure
assessments
were
refined
through
the
use
of
experimentally
determined
processing
factors,
DEEM
7.81
default
processing
factors,
and
percent
crop
treated
estimates
provided
by
BEAD.
The
anticipated
residue
estimates
are
based
primarily
on
USDA
PDP
monitoring
data.
However,
because
monitoring
data
did
not
analyze
for
all
triadimefon
metabolites
of
concern,
the
ratios
of
total
toxic
residues
(
TTR)
to
triadimefon
and
triadimenol
from
available
metabolism
studies
was
used
to
estimate
the
total
residues
of
concern.
The
metabolism
study
conducted
with
grapes
was
used
based
on
the
similarities
to
all
the
supported
crops
and
the
fact
that
it
will
produce
a
more
conservative
assessment
than
using
the
cucumber
or
tomato
metabolism
studies.
HED
concludes
that
the
exposure
estimates
provided
in
this
document
are
unlikely
to
underestimate
actual
exposure.

VIII.
Conclusions
Acute
and
chronic
dietary
(
food
and
water)
exposure
assessments
were
conducted
using
the
Dietary
Exposure
Evaluation
Model
software
with
the
Food
Commodity
Intake
Database
(
DEEM­
FCID
 
,
Version
2.03),
which
uses
food
consumption
data
from
the
USDA's
Continuing
Surveys
of
Food
Intakes
by
Individuals
(
CSFII)
from
1994­
1996
and
1998.
The
acute
and
chronic
dietary
risk
assessments
were
conducted
for
all
supported
triadimefon
food
uses
and
were
performed
to
support
the
reregistration
eligibility
decision
document.
The
anticipated
residue
(
AR)
estimates
are
based
primarily
on
monitoring
data.
However,
because
monitoring
data
did
not
analyze
for
all
triadimefon
metabolites,
KWG
1323
and
KWG
1342,
the
ratio
of
total
toxic
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
13
of
36
residues
(
TTR)
to
triadimefon
and
triadimenol
from
available
metabolism
studies
was
used
to
estimate
the
total
residues
of
concern.
The
sum
of
triadimefon
and
triadimenol
was
multiplied
by
the
ratio
1.25
to
account
for
metabolites,
KWG
1323
and
KWG
1342.
The
assessment
includes
surface
water
scenarios
from
Florida
turf
(
tees/
greens;
tees/
greens/
fairways;
fairways
only;
and
entire
course)
scenarios
and
golf
course
adjustment
factors
(
GCAFs)
were
applied
for
surface
water.

The
acute
dietary
exposure
estimates
from
food
alone
are
below
HED's
level
of
concern
(<
100
%
aPAD)
at
the
99.9th
percentile
of
exposure.
Triadimefon
dietary
exposure
at
the
99.9th
percentile
from
food
alone
is
15%
of
the
aPAD
for
the
U.
S.
population
and
49%
of
the
aPAD
for
children
1­
2
yrs,
the
most
highly
exposed
population
subgroup.

The
acute
dietary
exposure
estimates
from
food
and
drinking
water
using
the
golf
tees
and
greens
applications
for
drinking
water
are
below
HED's
level
of
concern
(<
100%
aPAD)
at
the
99.9th
percentile
of
exposure.
Triadimefon
dietary
exposure
at
the
99.9th
percentile
from
food
and
drinking
water
is
32%
of
the
aPAD
for
the
U.
S.
population
and
73%
of
the
aPAD
for
all
infants
(<
1
yr),
the
most
highly
exposed
population
subgroup
(
See
Table
7).
The
acute
dietary
exposure
estimates
from
food
and
drinking
water
using
tees/
greens/
fairways,
fairways
only
and
entire
course
for
drinking
water
are
above
HED's
level
of
concern
(>
100%
aPAD)
at
the
99.9th
percentile
of
exposure.

The
chronic
dietary
exposure
to
triadimefon
from
food
alone
is
below
HED's
level
of
concern
(<
100%
of
the
cPAD)
for
the
U.
S.
population
(<
1%
of
cPAD)
and
children
1­
2
yrs
(
3%
of
the
cPAD).
The
chronic
dietary
exposure
estimates
from
triadimefon
residues
in
food
and
drinking
water
using
the
worst­
case
(
entire
golf
course)
application
1
in
10
year
annual
concentration
are
below
HED's
level
of
concern
(<
100%
cPAD)
for
the
U.
S.
population
and
all
population
subgroups.
Triadimefon
dietary
exposure
from
food
and
drinking
water
for
the
U.
S.
population
is
14%
of
the
cPAD
and
46%
of
the
cPAD
for
all
infants
(<
1
yr),
the
most
highly
exposed
population
subgroup.
Triadimefon
is
classified
as
Category
C
"
possible
human
carcinogen."
No
Q1*
has
been
derived
(
see
Table
7).
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
14
of
36
Table
7.
Summary
of
Dietary
Exposure
(
Food
+
Drinking
Water­
Tees
and
Greens)
and
Risk
Assessment
for
Tridimefon
Acute
Dietary
(
99.9th
Percentile)
Chronic
Dietary
Cancer
Population
Subgroup
Dietary
Exposure
(
mg/
kg/
day)
%
aPAD
Dietary
Exposure
(
mg/
kg/
day)
%
cPAD
Dietary
Exposure
(
mg/
kg/
day)
Risk
General
U.
S.
Population
0.001075
32
0.000480
1
All
Infants
(<
1
year
old)
0.002492
73
0.001546
3
Children
1­
2
years
old
0.001920
56
0.000780
4
Children
3­
5
years
old
0.001474
43
0.000701
3
Children
6­
12
years
old
0.000745
22
0.000466
1
Youth
13­
19
years
old
0.000681
20
0.000343
<
1
Adults
20­
49
years
old
0.000731
22
0.000443
<
1
Adults
50+
years
old
0.000573
17
0.000468
1
Females
13­
49
years
old
0.000727
21
0.000442
1
N/
A
N/
A
IX.
List
of
Attachments
Attachment
1.
Acute
Residue
Input
Data
for
Food
Alone
Attachment
2.
Acute
Residue
Analysis
for
Triadimefon
Food
Alone
Attachment
3.
Acute
Residue
Input
Data
for
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Tees
and
greens)
Attachment
4.
Acute
Residue
Analysis
for
Triadimefon
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Tees
and
greens)
Attachment
5.
Acute
Residue
Input
Data
for
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Fairways
only)
Attachment
6.
Acute
Residue
Analysis
for
Triadimefon
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Fairways
only)
Attachment
7.
Acute
Residue
Input
Data
for
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Tees,
greens
and
fairways)
Attachment
8.
Acute
Residue
Analysis
for
Triadimefon
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Tees,
greens
and
fairways)
Attachment
9.
Acute
Residue
Input
Data
for
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
entire
golf
course)
Attachment
10.
Acute
Residue
Analysis
for
Triadimefon
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
entire
golf
course)
Attachment
11.
Chronic
Residue
Input
Data
for
Food
Alone
Attachment
12.
Chronic
Residue
Analysis
for
Triadimefon
Food
Alone
Attachment
13.
Chronic
Residue
Input
Data
for
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Tees
and
greens)
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
15
of
36
Attachment
14.
Chronic
Residue
Analysis
for
Triadimefon
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Tees
and
greens)
Attachment
15.
Chronic
Residue
Input
Data
for
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Fairways
only)
Attachment
16.
Chronic
Residue
Analysis
for
Triadimefon
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Fairways
only)
Attachment
17.
Chronic
Residue
Input
Data
for
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Tees,
greens
and
fairways)
Attachment
18.
Chronic
Residue
Analysis
for
Triadimefon
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Tees,
greens
and
fairways)
Attachment
19.
Chronic
Residue
Input
Data
for
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
entire
golf
course)
Attachment
20.
Chronic
Residue
Analysis
for
Triadimefon
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
entire
golf
course)
Attachment
21.
Acute
Food
Only
Critical
Exposure
Contribution
Analysis
Attachment
22.
Usage
Report
in
Support
of
Reregistration
for
Triadimefon.

cc:
SPiper,
CEB
Reading
Files;
YBarnes,
RRB2
Reading
Files
RDI:
DE
SAC
Reviewer
7/
5/
06;
A.
Nielsen
7/
6/
06
7509P:
CEB
PY­
Rm
10244:
308­
2717:
Triadimefon
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
16
of
36
Attachment
1.
Acute
Residue
Input
Data
for
Food
Alone
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.02
DEEM­
FCID
Acute
analysis
for
TRIADIMEFON
Residue
file
name:
C:\
Documents
and
Settings\
spiper\
SPIPER\
triadimenol\
Triadimefon
acute
(
3
applications)
6
27
2006
FOOD
ONLY.
R98
Analysis
Date
06­
30­
2006
Residue
file
dated:
06­
30­
2006/
09:
04:
55/
8
Reference
dose
(
aRfD)
=
0.0034
mg/
kg
bw/
day
Comment:
food
only
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
RDL
indices
and
parameters
for
Monte
Carlo
Analysis:
Index
Dist
Parameter
#
1
Param
#
2
Param
#
3
Comment
#
Code
­­­­­
­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
1
6
Apple,
NB
or
PB
6
21
2006.
rdf
2
6
Apple,
B
­
6
21
2006.
rdf
3
6
GrapesPB
6
21
2006.
rdf
4
6
Pear,
NB
or
PB
6
21
2006.
rdf
5
6
Pineapples,
NB
or
PB
6
21
2006.
rdf
6
6
new
FDA
Raspberry
06
29
2006.
rdf
EPA
Crop
Food
Name
Def
Res
Adj.
Factors
RDL
Comment
Code
Grp
(
ppm)
#
1
#
2
Pntr
­­­­­­­­
­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­
­­­­­­­
11000070
11
Apple,
fruit
with
peel
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
11000080
11
Apple,
peeled
fruit
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
11000081
11
Apple,
peeled
fruit­
babyfood
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
11000090
11
Apple,
dried
0.200000
8.000
1.000
2
11000091
11
Apple,
dried­
babyfood
0.200000
8.000
1.000
2
11000100
11
Apple,
juice
0.200000
0.600
1.000
1
11000101
11
Apple,
juice­
babyfood
0.200000
0.600
1.000
1
11000110
11
Apple,
sauce
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
11000111
11
Apple,
sauce­
babyfood
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
95001750
O
Grape
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
95001760
O
Grape,
juice
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
95001761
O
Grape,
juice­
babyfood
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
95001770
O
Grape,
leaves
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
95001780
O
Grape,
raisin
2.500000
4.000
1.000
3
95001790
O
Grape,
wine
and
sherry
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
11002660
11
Pear
0.200000
1.000
1.000
4
11002661
11
Pear­
babyfood
0.200000
1.000
1.000
4
11002670
11
Pear,
dried
0.200000
6.250
1.000
4
11002680
11
Pear,
juice
0.200000
1.000
1.000
4
11002681
11
Pear,
juice­
babyfood
0.200000
1.000
1.000
4
95002790
O
Pineapple
2.000000
1.000
1.000
5
95002791
O
Pineapple­
babyfood
2.000000
1.000
1.000
5
95002800
O
Pineapple,
dried
2.000000
5.000
1.000
5
95002810
O
Pineapple,
juice
2.000000
1.000
1.000
5
95002811
O
Pineapple,
juice­
babyfood
2.000000
1.000
1.000
5
13013200
13A
Raspberry
2.000000
1.000
1.000
6
13013201
13A
Raspberry­
babyfood
2.000000
1.000
1.000
6
13013210
13A
Raspberry,
juice
2.000000
1.000
1.000
6
13013211
13A
Raspberry,
juice­
babyfood
2.000000
1.000
1.000
6
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
17
of
36
Attachment
2.
Acute
Residue
Analysis
for
Triadimefon
Food
Alone
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.02
DEEM­
FCID
ACUTE
Analysis
for
TRIADIMEFON
(
1994­
98
data)
Residue
file:
Triadimefon
acute
(
3
applications)
6
27
2006
FOOD
ONLY.
R98
Adjustment
factor
#
2
used.
Analysis
Date:
06­
30­
2006/
09:
08:
36
Residue
file
dated:
06­
30­
2006/
09:
04:
55/
8
Daily
totals
for
food
and
foodform
consumption
used.
MC
iterations
=
1000
MC
list
in
residue
file
MC
seed
=
10
Run
Comment:
"
food
only"
===============================================================================

Summary
calculations
(
per
capita):

95th
Percentile
99th
Percentile
99.9th
Percentile
Exposure
%
aRfD
Exposure
%
aRfD
Exposure
%
aRfD
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­
U.
S.
Population:
0.000014
0.42
0.000097
2.86
0.000506
14.88
All
infants:
0.000051
1.51
0.000231
6.80
0.000717
21.09
Children
1­
2
yrs:
0.000109
3.19
0.000446
13.10
0.001679
49.38
Children
3­
5
yrs:
0.000069
2.02
0.000268
7.88
0.001096
32.22
Children
6­
12
yrs:
0.000031
0.91
0.000139
4.09
0.000516
15.19
Youth
13­
19
yrs:
0.000005
0.15
0.000060
1.75
0.000240
7.07
Adults
20­
49
yrs:
0.000007
0.20
0.000060
1.78
0.000351
10.33
Adults
50+
yrs:
0.000010
0.29
0.000058
1.70
0.000275
8.10
Females
13­
49
yrs:
0.000007
0.22
0.000068
2.01
0.000353
10.38
Attachment
3.
Acute
Residue
Input
Data
for
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Tees
and
greens)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.02
DEEM­
FCID
Acute
analysis
for
TRIADIMEFON
Residue
file
name:
C:\
Documents
and
Settings\
spiper\
SPIPER\
triadimenol\
Triadimefon
acute
(
3
applications)
tees&
greens.
R98
Analysis
Date
06­
30­
2006
Residue
file
dated:
06­
30­
2006/
09:
11:
36/
8
Reference
dose
(
aRfD)
=
0.0034
mg/
kg
bw/
day
Comment:
food
+
tees
and
greens
only
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
RDL
indices
and
parameters
for
Monte
Carlo
Analysis:
Index
Dist
Parameter
#
1
Param
#
2
Param
#
3
Comment
#
Code
­­­­­
­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
1
6
Apple,
NB
or
PB
6
21
2006.
rdf
2
6
Apple,
B
­
6
21
2006.
rdf
3
6
GrapesPB
6
21
2006.
rdf
4
6
Pear,
NB
or
PB
6
21
2006.
rdf
5
6
Pineapples,
NB
or
PB
6
21
2006.
rdf
6
6
new
FDA
Raspberry
06
29
2006.
rdf
EPA
Crop
Food
Name
Def
Res
Adj.
Factors
RDL
Comment
Code
Grp
(
ppm)
#
1
#
2
Pntr
­­­­­­­­
­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­
­­­­­­­
11000070
11
Apple,
fruit
with
peel
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
11000080
11
Apple,
peeled
fruit
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
11000081
11
Apple,
peeled
fruit­
babyfood
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
11000090
11
Apple,
dried
0.200000
8.000
1.000
2
11000091
11
Apple,
dried­
babyfood
0.200000
8.000
1.000
2
11000100
11
Apple,
juice
0.200000
0.600
1.000
1
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
18
of
36
11000101
11
Apple,
juice­
babyfood
0.200000
0.600
1.000
1
11000110
11
Apple,
sauce
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
11000111
11
Apple,
sauce­
babyfood
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
95001750
O
Grape
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
95001760
O
Grape,
juice
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
95001761
O
Grape,
juice­
babyfood
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
95001770
O
Grape,
leaves
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
95001780
O
Grape,
raisin
2.500000
4.000
1.000
3
95001790
O
Grape,
wine
and
sherry
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
11002660
11
Pear
0.200000
1.000
1.000
4
11002661
11
Pear­
babyfood
0.200000
1.000
1.000
4
11002670
11
Pear,
dried
0.200000
6.250
1.000
4
11002680
11
Pear,
juice
0.200000
1.000
1.000
4
11002681
11
Pear,
juice­
babyfood
0.200000
1.000
1.000
4
95002790
O
Pineapple
2.000000
1.000
1.000
5
95002791
O
Pineapple­
babyfood
2.000000
1.000
1.000
5
95002800
O
Pineapple,
dried
2.000000
5.000
1.000
5
95002810
O
Pineapple,
juice
2.000000
1.000
1.000
5
95002811
O
Pineapple,
juice­
babyfood
2.000000
1.000
1.000
5
13013200
13A
Raspberry
2.000000
1.000
1.000
6
13013201
13A
Raspberry­
babyfood
2.000000
1.000
1.000
6
13013210
13A
Raspberry,
juice
2.000000
1.000
1.000
6
13013211
13A
Raspberry,
juice­
babyfood
2.000000
1.000
1.000
6
86010000
O
Water,
direct,
all
sources
0.004900
1.000
1.000
86020000
O
Water,
indirect,
all
sources
0.004900
1.000
1.000
Attachment
4.
Acute
Residue
Analysis
for
Triadimefon
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Tees
and
greens)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.02
DEEM­
FCID
ACUTE
Analysis
for
TRIADIMEFON
(
1994­
98
data)
Residue
file:
Triadimefon
acute
(
3
applications)
tees&
greens.
R98
Adjustment
factor
#
2
used.
Analysis
Date:
06­
30­
2006/
09:
17:
11
Residue
file
dated:
06­
30­
2006/
09:
11:
36/
8
Daily
totals
for
food
and
foodform
consumption
used.
MC
iterations
=
1000
MC
list
in
residue
file
MC
seed
=
10
Run
Comment:
"
food
+
tees
and
greens
only"
===============================================================================

Summary
calculations
(
per
capita):

95th
Percentile
99th
Percentile
99.9th
Percentile
Exposure
%
aRfD
Exposure
%
aRfD
Exposure
%
aRfD
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­
U.
S.
Population:
0.000270
7.93
0.000508
14.93
0.001075
31.61
All
infants:
0.000970
28.54
0.001411
41.49
0.002492
73.29
Children
1­
2
yrs:
0.000476
13.99
0.000809
23.78
0.001920
56.46
Children
3­
5
yrs:
0.000407
11.98
0.000633
18.61
0.001474
43.34
Children
6­
12
yrs:
0.000271
7.98
0.000457
13.43
0.000745
21.92
Youth
13­
19
yrs:
0.000215
6.32
0.000357
10.51
0.000681
20.02
Adults
20­
49
yrs:
0.000245
7.20
0.000410
12.05
0.000731
21.50
Adults
50+
yrs:
0.000221
6.50
0.000322
9.46
0.000573
16.86
Females
13­
49
yrs:
0.000246
7.23
0.000407
11.97
0.000727
21.37
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
19
of
36
Attachment
5.
Acute
Residue
Input
Data
for
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Fairways
only)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.02
DEEM­
FCID
Acute
analysis
for
TRIADIMEFON
Residue
file
name:
C:\
Documents
and
Settings\
spiper\
SPIPER\
triadimenol\
Triadimefon
acute
(
3
applications)
fairways.
R98
Analysis
Date
06­
30­
2006
Residue
file
dated:
06­
30­
2006/
09:
42:
23/
8
Reference
dose
(
aRfD)
=
0.0034
mg/
kg
bw/
day
Comment:
food
+
fairways
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
RDL
indices
and
parameters
for
Monte
Carlo
Analysis:
Index
Dist
Parameter
#
1
Param
#
2
Param
#
3
Comment
#
Code
­­­­­
­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
1
6
Apple,
NB
or
PB
6
21
2006.
rdf
2
6
Apple,
B
­
6
21
2006.
rdf
3
6
GrapesPB
6
21
2006.
rdf
4
6
Pear,
NB
or
PB
6
21
2006.
rdf
5
6
Pineapples,
NB
or
PB
6
21
2006.
rdf
6
6
new
FDA
Raspberry
06
29
2006.
rdf
EPA
Crop
Food
Name
Def
Res
Adj.
Factors
RDL
Comment
Code
Grp
(
ppm)
#
1
#
2
Pntr
­­­­­­­­
­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­
­­­­­­­
11000070
11
Apple,
fruit
with
peel
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
11000080
11
Apple,
peeled
fruit
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
11000081
11
Apple,
peeled
fruit­
babyfood
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
11000090
11
Apple,
dried
0.200000
8.000
1.000
2
11000091
11
Apple,
dried­
babyfood
0.200000
8.000
1.000
2
11000100
11
Apple,
juice
0.200000
0.600
1.000
1
11000101
11
Apple,
juice­
babyfood
0.200000
0.600
1.000
1
11000110
11
Apple,
sauce
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
11000111
11
Apple,
sauce­
babyfood
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
95001750
O
Grape
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
95001760
O
Grape,
juice
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
95001761
O
Grape,
juice­
babyfood
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
95001770
O
Grape,
leaves
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
95001780
O
Grape,
raisin
2.500000
4.000
1.000
3
95001790
O
Grape,
wine
and
sherry
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
11002660
11
Pear
0.200000
1.000
1.000
4
11002661
11
Pear­
babyfood
0.200000
1.000
1.000
4
11002670
11
Pear,
dried
0.200000
6.250
1.000
4
11002680
11
Pear,
juice
0.200000
1.000
1.000
4
11002681
11
Pear,
juice­
babyfood
0.200000
1.000
1.000
4
95002790
O
Pineapple
2.000000
1.000
1.000
5
95002791
O
Pineapple­
babyfood
2.000000
1.000
1.000
5
95002800
O
Pineapple,
dried
2.000000
5.000
1.000
5
95002810
O
Pineapple,
juice
2.000000
1.000
1.000
5
95002811
O
Pineapple,
juice­
babyfood
2.000000
1.000
1.000
5
13013200
13A
Raspberry
2.000000
1.000
1.000
6
13013201
13A
Raspberry­
babyfood
2.000000
1.000
1.000
6
13013210
13A
Raspberry,
juice
2.000000
1.000
1.000
6
13013211
13A
Raspberry,
juice­
babyfood
2.000000
1.000
1.000
6
86010000
O
Water,
direct,
all
sources
0.028000
1.000
1.000
86020000
O
Water,
indirect,
all
sources
0.028000
1.000
1.000
Attachment
6.
Acute
Residue
Analysis
for
Triadimefon
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Fairways
only)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.02
DEEM­
FCID
ACUTE
Analysis
for
TRIADIMEFON
(
1994­
98
data)
Residue
file:
Triadimefon
acute
(
3
applications)
fairways.
R98
Adjustment
factor
#
2
used.
Analysis
Date:
06­
30­
2006/
09:
46:
38
Residue
file
dated:
06­
30­
2006/
09:
42:
23/
8
Daily
totals
for
food
and
foodform
consumption
used.
MC
iterations
=
1000
MC
list
in
residue
file
MC
seed
=
10
Run
Comment:
"
food
+
fairways"
===============================================================================
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
20
of
36
Summary
calculations
(
per
capita):

95th
Percentile
99th
Percentile
99.9th
Percentile
Exposure
%
aRfD
Exposure
%
aRfD
Exposure
%
aRfD
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­
U.
S.
Population:
0.001470
43.24
0.002772
81.52
0.005567
163.73
All
infants:
0.005516
162.23
0.007910
232.64
0.014164
416.60
Children
1­
2
yrs:
0.002341
68.86
0.003934
115.70
0.005934
174.54
Children
3­
5
yrs:
0.002120
62.36
0.003317
97.57
0.005979
175.85
Children
6­
12
yrs:
0.001467
43.15
0.002448
72.00
0.003355
98.66
Youth
13­
19
yrs:
0.001192
35.06
0.002015
59.25
0.003582
105.34
Adults
20­
49
yrs:
0.001360
40.01
0.002277
66.97
0.004121
121.22
Adults
50+
yrs:
0.001231
36.22
0.001764
51.87
0.002853
83.90
Females
13­
49
yrs:
0.001365
40.15
0.002195
64.56
0.003903
114.79
Attachment
7.
Acute
Residue
Input
Data
for
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Tees,
greens
and
fairways)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.02
DEEM­
FCID
Acute
analysis
for
TRIADIMEFON
Residue
file
name:
C:\
Documents
and
Settings\
spiper\
SPIPER\
triadimenol\
Triadimefon
acute
(
3
applications)
tees&
green&
fairways.
R98
Analysis
Date
06­
30­
2006
Residue
file
dated:
06­
30­
2006/
09:
32:
44/
8
Reference
dose
(
aRfD)
=
0.0034
mg/
kg
bw/
day
Comment:
food
+
tees
+
greens
+
fairways
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
RDL
indices
and
parameters
for
Monte
Carlo
Analysis:
Index
Dist
Parameter
#
1
Param
#
2
Param
#
3
Comment
#
Code
­­­­­
­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
1
6
Apple,
NB
or
PB
6
21
2006.
rdf
2
6
Apple,
B
­
6
21
2006.
rdf
3
6
GrapesPB
6
21
2006.
rdf
4
6
Pear,
NB
or
PB
6
21
2006.
rdf
5
6
Pineapples,
NB
or
PB
6
21
2006.
rdf
6
6
new
FDA
Raspberry
06
29
2006.
rdf
EPA
Crop
Food
Name
Def
Res
Adj.
Factors
RDL
Comment
Code
Grp
(
ppm)
#
1
#
2
Pntr
­­­­­­­­
­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­
­­­­­­­
11000070
11
Apple,
fruit
with
peel
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
11000080
11
Apple,
peeled
fruit
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
11000081
11
Apple,
peeled
fruit­
babyfood
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
11000090
11
Apple,
dried
0.200000
8.000
1.000
2
11000091
11
Apple,
dried­
babyfood
0.200000
8.000
1.000
2
11000100
11
Apple,
juice
0.200000
0.600
1.000
1
11000101
11
Apple,
juice­
babyfood
0.200000
0.600
1.000
1
11000110
11
Apple,
sauce
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
11000111
11
Apple,
sauce­
babyfood
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
95001750
O
Grape
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
95001760
O
Grape,
juice
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
95001761
O
Grape,
juice­
babyfood
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
95001770
O
Grape,
leaves
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
95001780
O
Grape,
raisin
2.500000
4.000
1.000
3
95001790
O
Grape,
wine
and
sherry
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
11002660
11
Pear
0.200000
1.000
1.000
4
11002661
11
Pear­
babyfood
0.200000
1.000
1.000
4
11002670
11
Pear,
dried
0.200000
6.250
1.000
4
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
21
of
36
11002680
11
Pear,
juice
0.200000
1.000
1.000
4
11002681
11
Pear,
juice­
babyfood
0.200000
1.000
1.000
4
95002790
O
Pineapple
2.000000
1.000
1.000
5
95002791
O
Pineapple­
babyfood
2.000000
1.000
1.000
5
95002800
O
Pineapple,
dried
2.000000
5.000
1.000
5
95002810
O
Pineapple,
juice
2.000000
1.000
1.000
5
95002811
O
Pineapple,
juice­
babyfood
2.000000
1.000
1.000
5
13013200
13A
Raspberry
2.000000
1.000
1.000
6
13013201
13A
Raspberry­
babyfood
2.000000
1.000
1.000
6
13013210
13A
Raspberry,
juice
2.000000
1.000
1.000
6
13013211
13A
Raspberry,
juice­
babyfood
2.000000
1.000
1.000
6
86010000
O
Water,
direct,
all
sources
0.033000
1.000
1.000
86020000
O
Water,
indirect,
all
sources
0.033000
1.000
1.000
Attachment
8.
Acute
Residue
Analysis
for
Triadimefon
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Tees,
greens
and
fairways)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.02
DEEM­
FCID
ACUTE
Analysis
for
TRIADIMEFON
(
1994­
98
data)
Residue
file:
Triadimefon
acute
(
3
applications)
tees&
green&
fairways.
R98
Adjustment
factor
#
2
used.
Analysis
Date:
06­
30­
2006/
09:
36:
56
Residue
file
dated:
06­
30­
2006/
09:
32:
44/
8
Daily
totals
for
food
and
foodform
consumption
used.
MC
iterations
=
1000
MC
list
in
residue
file
MC
seed
=
10
Run
Comment:
"
food
+
tees
+
greens
+
fairways"
===============================================================================

Summary
calculations
(
per
capita):

95th
Percentile
99th
Percentile
99.9th
Percentile
Exposure
%
aRfD
Exposure
%
aRfD
Exposure
%
aRfD
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­
U.
S.
Population:
0.001731
50.91
0.003261
95.91
0.006519
191.73
All
infants:
0.006490
190.89
0.009289
273.20
0.016731
492.09
Children
1­
2
yrs:
0.002749
80.84
0.004646
136.65
0.007002
205.95
Children
3­
5
yrs:
0.002490
73.22
0.003902
114.77
0.006997
205.80
Children
6­
12
yrs:
0.001729
50.84
0.002887
84.91
0.003929
115.57
Youth
13­
19
yrs:
0.001407
41.38
0.002356
69.29
0.004230
124.40
Adults
20­
49
yrs:
0.001601
47.10
0.002678
78.75
0.004867
143.15
Adults
50+
yrs:
0.001449
42.61
0.002078
61.11
0.003365
98.98
Females
13­
49
yrs:
0.001610
47.36
0.002590
76.17
0.004578
134.66
Attachment
9.
Acute
Residue
Input
Data
for
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
entire
golf
course)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.02
DEEM­
FCID
Acute
analysis
for
TRIADIMEFON
Residue
file
name:
C:\
Documents
and
Settings\
spiper\
SPIPER\
triadimenol\
Triadimefon
acute
(
3
applications)
entiregolf.
R98
Analysis
Date
06­
30­
2006
Residue
file
dated:
06­
30­
2006/
11:
12:
20/
8
Reference
dose
(
aRfD)
=
0.0034
mg/
kg
bw/
day
Comment:
food
+
entire
golf
course
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
RDL
indices
and
parameters
for
Monte
Carlo
Analysis:
Index
Dist
Parameter
#
1
Param
#
2
Param
#
3
Comment
#
Code
­­­­­
­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
22
of
36
1
6
Apple,
NB
or
PB
6
21
2006.
rdf
2
6
Apple,
B
­
6
21
2006.
rdf
3
6
GrapesPB
6
21
2006.
rdf
4
6
Pear,
NB
or
PB
6
21
2006.
rdf
5
6
Pineapples,
NB
or
PB
6
21
2006.
rdf
6
6
new
FDA
Raspberry
06
29
2006.
rdf
EPA
Crop
Food
Name
Def
Res
Adj.
Factors
RDL
Comment
Code
Grp
(
ppm)
#
1
#
2
Pntr
­­­­­­­­
­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­
­­­­­­­
11000070
11
Apple,
fruit
with
peel
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
11000080
11
Apple,
peeled
fruit
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
11000081
11
Apple,
peeled
fruit­
babyfood
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
11000090
11
Apple,
dried
0.200000
8.000
1.000
2
11000091
11
Apple,
dried­
babyfood
0.200000
8.000
1.000
2
11000100
11
Apple,
juice
0.200000
0.600
1.000
1
11000101
11
Apple,
juice­
babyfood
0.200000
0.600
1.000
1
11000110
11
Apple,
sauce
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
11000111
11
Apple,
sauce­
babyfood
0.200000
1.000
1.000
1
95001750
O
Grape
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
95001760
O
Grape,
juice
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
95001761
O
Grape,
juice­
babyfood
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
95001770
O
Grape,
leaves
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
95001780
O
Grape,
raisin
2.500000
4.000
1.000
3
95001790
O
Grape,
wine
and
sherry
1.000000
1.000
1.000
3
11002660
11
Pear
0.200000
1.000
1.000
4
11002661
11
Pear­
babyfood
0.200000
1.000
1.000
4
11002670
11
Pear,
dried
0.200000
6.250
1.000
4
11002680
11
Pear,
juice
0.200000
1.000
1.000
4
11002681
11
Pear,
juice­
babyfood
0.200000
1.000
1.000
4
95002790
O
Pineapple
2.000000
1.000
1.000
5
95002791
O
Pineapple­
babyfood
2.000000
1.000
1.000
5
95002800
O
Pineapple,
dried
2.000000
5.000
1.000
5
95002810
O
Pineapple,
juice
2.000000
1.000
1.000
5
95002811
O
Pineapple,
juice­
babyfood
2.000000
1.000
1.000
5
13013200
13A
Raspberry
2.000000
1.000
1.000
6
13013201
13A
Raspberry­
babyfood
2.000000
1.000
1.000
6
13013210
13A
Raspberry,
juice
2.000000
1.000
1.000
6
13013211
13A
Raspberry,
juice­
babyfood
2.000000
1.000
1.000
6
86010000
O
Water,
direct,
all
sources
0.097000
1.000
1.000
86020000
O
Water,
indirect,
all
sources
0.097000
1.000
1.000
Attachment
10.
Acute
Residue
Analysis
for
Triadimefon
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
entire
golf
course)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.02
DEEM­
FCID
ACUTE
Analysis
for
TRIADIMEFON
(
1994­
98
data)
Residue
file:
Triadimefon
acute
(
3
applications)
entiregolf.
R98
Adjustment
factor
#
2
used.
Analysis
Date:
06­
30­
2006/
11:
16:
33
Residue
file
dated:
06­
30­
2006/
11:
12:
20/
8
Daily
totals
for
food
and
foodform
consumption
used.
MC
iterations
=
1000
MC
list
in
residue
file
MC
seed
=
10
Run
Comment:
"
food
+
entire
golf
course"
===============================================================================

Summary
calculations
(
per
capita):

95th
Percentile
99th
Percentile
99.9th
Percentile
Exposure
%
aRfD
Exposure
%
aRfD
Exposure
%
aRfD
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­
U.
S.
Population:
0.005076
149.31
0.009543
280.69
0.019034
559.81
All
infants:
0.018995
558.67
0.027288
802.59
0.048734
1433.35
Children
1­
2
yrs:
0.007967
234.31
0.013323
391.86
0.020277
596.37
Children
3­
5
yrs:
0.007284
214.23
0.011382
334.77
0.019559
575.26
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
23
of
36
Children
6­
12
yrs:
0.005055
148.67
0.008427
247.84
0.011501
338.27
Youth
13­
19
yrs:
0.004121
121.20
0.006928
203.76
0.012456
366.36
Adults
20­
49
yrs:
0.004700
138.24
0.007874
231.59
0.014162
416.54
Adults
50+
yrs:
0.004244
124.83
0.006066
178.41
0.009861
290.03
Females
13­
49
yrs:
0.004723
138.92
0.007569
222.62
0.013442
395.35
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
24
of
36
Attachment
11.
Chronic
Residue
Input
Data
for
Food
Alone
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.00
DEEM­
FCID
Chronic
analysis
for
TRIADIMEFON
1994­
98
data
Residue
file:
C:\
Documents
and
Settings\
spiper\
SPIPER\
triadimenol\
Triadimefon
chronic
(
3
applications).
R98
Adjust.
#
2
used
Analysis
Date
07­
03­
2006
Residue
file
dated:
07­
03­
2006/
08:
14:
24/
8
Reference
dose
(
RfD)
=
0.0034
mg/
kg
bw/
day
Comment:
Food
only
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Food
Crop
Residue
Adj.
Factors
Comment
EPA
Code
Grp
Food
Name
(
ppm)
#
1
#
2
­­­­­­­­
­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­­­­­
11000070
11
Apple,
fruit
with
peel
0.000140
1.000
1.000
11000080
11
Apple,
peeled
fruit
0.000140
1.000
1.000
11000081
11
Apple,
peeled
fruit­
babyfood
0.000140
1.000
1.000
11000090
11
Apple,
dried
0.001300
8.000
1.000
11000091
11
Apple,
dried­
babyfood
0.001300
8.000
1.000
11000100
11
Apple,
juice
0.000140
0.600
1.000
11000101
11
Apple,
juice­
babyfood
0.000140
0.600
1.000
11000110
11
Apple,
sauce
0.000140
1.000
1.000
11000111
11
Apple,
sauce­
babyfood
0.000140
1.000
1.000
95001750
O
Grape
0.027000
1.000
1.000
95001760
O
Grape,
juice
0.027000
1.000
1.000
95001761
O
Grape,
juice­
babyfood
0.027000
1.000
1.000
95001770
O
Grape,
leaves
0.027000
1.000
1.000
95001780
O
Grape,
raisin
0.027000
4.000
1.000
95001790
O
Grape,
wine
and
sherry
0.027000
1.000
1.000
11002660
11
Pear
0.001000
1.000
1.000
11002661
11
Pear­
babyfood
0.001000
1.000
1.000
11002670
11
Pear,
dried
0.001000
6.250
1.000
11002680
11
Pear,
juice
0.001000
1.000
1.000
11002681
11
Pear,
juice­
babyfood
0.001000
1.000
1.000
95002790
O
Pineapple
0.001000
1.000
1.000
95002791
O
Pineapple­
babyfood
0.001000
1.000
1.000
95002800
O
Pineapple,
dried
0.001000
5.000
1.000
95002810
O
Pineapple,
juice
0.001000
1.000
1.000
95002811
O
Pineapple,
juice­
babyfood
0.001000
1.000
1.000
13013200
13A
Raspberry
0.024000
1.000
1.000
13013201
13A
Raspberry­
babyfood
0.024000
1.000
1.000
13013210
13A
Raspberry,
juice
0.024000
1.000
1.000
13013211
13A
Raspberry,
juice­
babyfood
0.024000
1.000
1.000
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
25
of
36
Attachment
12.
Chronic
Residue
Analyis
for
Triadimefon
Food
Alone
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.00
DEEM­
FCID
Chronic
analysis
for
TRIADIMEFON
(
1994­
98
data)
Residue
file
name:
C:\
Documents
and
Settings\
spiper\
SPIPER\
triadimenol\
Triadimefon
chronic
(
3
applications).
R98
Adjustment
factor
#
2
used.
Analysis
Date
07­
03­
2006/
08:
14:
42
Residue
file
dated:
07­
03­
2006/
08:
14:
24/
8
Reference
dose
(
RfD,
Chronic)
=
.0034
mg/
kg
bw/
day
COMMENT
1:
Food
only
===============================================================================
Total
exposure
by
population
subgroup
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

Total
Exposure
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Population
mg/
kg
Percent
of
Subgroup
body
wt/
day
Rfd
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
U.
S.
Population
(
total)
0.000017
0.5%

U.
S.
Population
(
spring
season)
0.000016
0.5%
U.
S.
Population
(
summer
season)
0.000018
0.5%
U.
S.
Population
(
autumn
season)
0.000016
0.5%
U.
S.
Population
(
winter
season)
0.000017
0.5%

Northeast
region
0.000020
0.6%
Midwest
region
0.000016
0.5%
Southern
region
0.000014
0.4%
Western
region
0.000018
0.5%

Hispanics
0.000013
0.4%
Non­
hispanic
whites
0.000018
0.5%
Non­
hispanic
blacks
0.000014
0.4%
Non­
hisp/
non­
white/
non­
black
0.000012
0.3%

All
infants
(<
1
year)
0.000026
0.8%
Nursing
infants
0.000010
0.3%
Non­
nursing
infants
0.000032
0.9%
Children
1­
6
yrs
0.000063
1.9%
Children
7­
12
yrs
0.000020
0.6%

Females
13­
19
(
not
preg
or
nursing)
0.000009
0.3%
Females
20+
(
not
preg
or
nursing)
0.000012
0.4%
Females
13­
50
yrs
0.000011
0.3%
Females
13+
(
preg/
not
nursing)
0.000007
0.2%
Females
13+
(
nursing)
0.000011
0.3%

Males
13­
19
yrs
0.000007
0.2%
Males
20+
yrs
0.000010
0.3%
Seniors
55+
0.000013
0.4%

Children
1­
2
yrs
0.000091
2.7%
Children
3­
5
yrs
0.000056
1.6%
Children
6­
12
yrs
0.000021
0.6%
Youth
13­
19
yrs
0.000008
0.2%
Adults
20­
49
yrs
0.000010
0.3%
Adults
50+
yrs
0.000012
0.4%
Females
13­
49
yrs
0.000011
0.3%

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
26
of
36
Attachment
13.
Chronic
Residue
Input
Data
for
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Tees
and
greens)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.00
DEEM­
FCID
Chronic
analysis
for
TRIADIMEFON
1994­
98
data
Residue
file:
C:\
Documents
and
Settings\
spiper\
SPIPER\
triadimenol\
Triadimefon
chronic
(
3
applications)
teesgreens.
R98
Adjust.
#
2
used
Analysis
Date
07­
03­
2006
Residue
file
dated:
07­
03­
2006/
08:
18:
56/
8
Reference
dose
(
RfD)
=
0.0034
mg/
kg
bw/
day
Comment:
Food
only
+
Tees
and
greens
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Food
Crop
Residue
Adj.
Factors
Comment
EPA
Code
Grp
Food
Name
(
ppm)
#
1
#
2
­­­­­­­­
­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­­­­­
11000070
11
Apple,
fruit
with
peel
0.000140
1.000
1.000
11000080
11
Apple,
peeled
fruit
0.000140
1.000
1.000
11000081
11
Apple,
peeled
fruit­
babyfood
0.000140
1.000
1.000
11000090
11
Apple,
dried
0.001300
8.000
1.000
11000091
11
Apple,
dried­
babyfood
0.001300
8.000
1.000
11000100
11
Apple,
juice
0.000140
0.600
1.000
11000101
11
Apple,
juice­
babyfood
0.000140
0.600
1.000
11000110
11
Apple,
sauce
0.000140
1.000
1.000
11000111
11
Apple,
sauce­
babyfood
0.000140
1.000
1.000
95001750
O
Grape
0.027000
1.000
1.000
95001760
O
Grape,
juice
0.027000
1.000
1.000
95001761
O
Grape,
juice­
babyfood
0.027000
1.000
1.000
95001770
O
Grape,
leaves
0.027000
1.000
1.000
95001780
O
Grape,
raisin
0.027000
4.000
1.000
95001790
O
Grape,
wine
and
sherry
0.027000
1.000
1.000
11002660
11
Pear
0.001000
1.000
1.000
11002661
11
Pear­
babyfood
0.001000
1.000
1.000
11002670
11
Pear,
dried
0.001000
6.250
1.000
11002680
11
Pear,
juice
0.001000
1.000
1.000
11002681
11
Pear,
juice­
babyfood
0.001000
1.000
1.000
95002790
O
Pineapple
0.001000
1.000
1.000
95002791
O
Pineapple­
babyfood
0.001000
1.000
1.000
95002800
O
Pineapple,
dried
0.001000
5.000
1.000
95002810
O
Pineapple,
juice
0.001000
1.000
1.000
95002811
O
Pineapple,
juice­
babyfood
0.001000
1.000
1.000
13013200
13A
Raspberry
0.024000
1.000
1.000
13013201
13A
Raspberry­
babyfood
0.024000
1.000
1.000
13013210
13A
Raspberry,
juice
0.024000
1.000
1.000
13013211
13A
Raspberry,
juice­
babyfood
0.024000
1.000
1.000
86010000
O
Water,
direct,
all
sources
0.001100
1.000
1.000
86020000
O
Water,
indirect,
all
sources
0.001100
1.000
1.000
Attachment
14.
Chronic
Residue
Analysis
for
Triadimefon
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Tees
and
greens)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.00
DEEM­
FCID
Chronic
analysis
for
TRIADIMEFON
(
1994­
98
data)
Residue
file
name:
C:\
Documents
and
Settings\
spiper\
SPIPER\
triadimenol\
Triadimefon
chronic
(
3
applications)
teesgreens.
R98
Adjustment
factor
#
2
used.
Analysis
Date
07­
03­
2006/
08:
19:
16
Residue
file
dated:
07­
03­
2006/
08:
18:
56/
8
Reference
dose
(
RfD,
Chronic)
=
.0034
mg/
kg
bw/
day
COMMENT
1:
Food
only
+
Tees
and
greens
===============================================================================
Total
exposure
by
population
subgroup
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

Total
Exposure
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Population
mg/
kg
Percent
of
Subgroup
body
wt/
day
Rfd
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
27
of
36
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
U.
S.
Population
(
total)
0.000040
1.2%

U.
S.
Population
(
spring
season)
0.000039
1.1%
U.
S.
Population
(
summer
season)
0.000043
1.3%
U.
S.
Population
(
autumn
season)
0.000038
1.1%
U.
S.
Population
(
winter
season)
0.000039
1.2%

Northeast
region
0.000041
1.2%
Midwest
region
0.000040
1.2%
Southern
region
0.000036
1.1%
Western
region
0.000045
1.3%

Hispanics
0.000039
1.2%
Non­
hispanic
whites
0.000041
1.2%
Non­
hispanic
blacks
0.000036
1.1%
Non­
hisp/
non­
white/
non­
black
0.000040
1.2%

All
infants
(<
1
year)
0.000102
3.0%
Nursing
infants
0.000039
1.1%
Non­
nursing
infants
0.000126
3.7%
Children
1­
6
yrs
0.000095
2.8%
Children
7­
12
yrs
0.000041
1.2%

Females
13­
19
(
not
preg
or
nursing)
0.000025
0.7%
Females
20+
(
not
preg
or
nursing)
0.000035
1.0%
Females
13­
50
yrs
0.000034
1.0%
Females
13+
(
preg/
not
nursing)
0.000030
0.9%
Females
13+
(
nursing)
0.000043
1.3%

Males
13­
19
yrs
0.000024
0.7%
Males
20+
yrs
0.000031
0.9%
Seniors
55+
0.000035
1.0%

Children
1­
2
yrs
0.000125
3.7%
Children
3­
5
yrs
0.000088
2.6%
Children
6­
12
yrs
0.000044
1.3%
Youth
13­
19
yrs
0.000025
0.7%
Adults
20­
49
yrs
0.000032
0.9%
Adults
50+
yrs
0.000035
1.0%
Females
13­
49
yrs
0.000033
1.0%

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

Attachment
15.
Chronic
Residue
Input
Data
for
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Fairways
only)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.00
DEEM­
FCID
Chronic
analysis
for
TRIADIMEFON
1994­
98
data
Residue
file:
C:\
Documents
and
Settings\
spiper\
SPIPER\
triadimenol\
Triadimefon
chronic
(
3
applications)
fairways.
R98
Adjust.
#
2
used
Analysis
Date
07­
03­
2006
Residue
file
dated:
07­
03­
2006/
08:
21:
33/
8
Reference
dose
(
RfD)
=
0.0034
mg/
kg
bw/
day
Comment:
Food
only
+
fairways
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Food
Crop
Residue
Adj.
Factors
Comment
EPA
Code
Grp
Food
Name
(
ppm)
#
1
#
2
­­­­­­­­
­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­­­­­
11000070
11
Apple,
fruit
with
peel
0.000140
1.000
1.000
11000080
11
Apple,
peeled
fruit
0.000140
1.000
1.000
11000081
11
Apple,
peeled
fruit­
babyfood
0.000140
1.000
1.000
11000090
11
Apple,
dried
0.001300
8.000
1.000
11000091
11
Apple,
dried­
babyfood
0.001300
8.000
1.000
11000100
11
Apple,
juice
0.000140
0.600
1.000
11000101
11
Apple,
juice­
babyfood
0.000140
0.600
1.000
11000110
11
Apple,
sauce
0.000140
1.000
1.000
11000111
11
Apple,
sauce­
babyfood
0.000140
1.000
1.000
95001750
O
Grape
0.027000
1.000
1.000
95001760
O
Grape,
juice
0.027000
1.000
1.000
95001761
O
Grape,
juice­
babyfood
0.027000
1.000
1.000
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
28
of
36
95001770
O
Grape,
leaves
0.027000
1.000
1.000
95001780
O
Grape,
raisin
0.027000
4.000
1.000
95001790
O
Grape,
wine
and
sherry
0.027000
1.000
1.000
11002660
11
Pear
0.001000
1.000
1.000
11002661
11
Pear­
babyfood
0.001000
1.000
1.000
11002670
11
Pear,
dried
0.001000
6.250
1.000
11002680
11
Pear,
juice
0.001000
1.000
1.000
11002681
11
Pear,
juice­
babyfood
0.001000
1.000
1.000
95002790
O
Pineapple
0.001000
1.000
1.000
95002791
O
Pineapple­
babyfood
0.001000
1.000
1.000
95002800
O
Pineapple,
dried
0.001000
5.000
1.000
95002810
O
Pineapple,
juice
0.001000
1.000
1.000
95002811
O
Pineapple,
juice­
babyfood
0.001000
1.000
1.000
13013200
13A
Raspberry
0.024000
1.000
1.000
13013201
13A
Raspberry­
babyfood
0.024000
1.000
1.000
13013210
13A
Raspberry,
juice
0.024000
1.000
1.000
13013211
13A
Raspberry,
juice­
babyfood
0.024000
1.000
1.000
86010000
O
Water,
direct,
all
sources
0.006400
1.000
1.000
86020000
O
Water,
indirect,
all
sources
0.006400
1.000
1.000
Attachment
16.
Chronic
Residue
Analysis
for
Triadimefon
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Fairways
only)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.00
DEEM­
FCID
Chronic
analysis
for
TRIADIMEFON
(
1994­
98
data)
Residue
file
name:
C:\
Documents
and
Settings\
spiper\
SPIPER\
triadimenol\
Triadimefon
chronic
(
3
applications)
fairways.
R98
Adjustment
factor
#
2
used.
Analysis
Date
07­
03­
2006/
08:
21:
48
Residue
file
dated:
07­
03­
2006/
08:
21:
33/
8
Reference
dose
(
RfD,
Chronic)
=
.0034
mg/
kg
bw/
day
COMMENT
1:
Food
only
+
fairways
===============================================================================
Total
exposure
by
population
subgroup
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

Total
Exposure
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Population
mg/
kg
Percent
of
Subgroup
body
wt/
day
Rfd
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
U.
S.
Population
(
total)
0.000152
4.5%

U.
S.
Population
(
spring
season)
0.000150
4.4%
U.
S.
Population
(
summer
season)
0.000163
4.8%
U.
S.
Population
(
autumn
season)
0.000146
4.3%
U.
S.
Population
(
winter
season)
0.000147
4.3%

Northeast
region
0.000143
4.2%
Midwest
region
0.000153
4.5%
Southern
region
0.000142
4.2%
Western
region
0.000173
5.1%

Hispanics
0.000166
4.9%
Non­
hispanic
whites
0.000150
4.4%
Non­
hispanic
blacks
0.000142
4.2%
Non­
hisp/
non­
white/
non­
black
0.000177
5.2%

All
infants
(<
1
year)
0.000468
13.8%
Nursing
infants
0.000174
5.1%
Non­
nursing
infants
0.000580
17.1%
Children
1­
6
yrs
0.000251
7.4%
Children
7­
12
yrs
0.000143
4.2%

Females
13­
19
(
not
preg
or
nursing)
0.000104
3.1%
Females
20+
(
not
preg
or
nursing)
0.000147
4.3%
Females
13­
50
yrs
0.000142
4.2%
Females
13+
(
preg/
not
nursing)
0.000138
4.1%
Females
13+
(
nursing)
0.000197
5.8%
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
29
of
36
Males
13­
19
yrs
0.000106
3.1%
Males
20+
yrs
0.000131
3.8%
Seniors
55+
0.000145
4.3%

Children
1­
2
yrs
0.000291
8.6%
Children
3­
5
yrs
0.000243
7.2%
Children
6­
12
yrs
0.000151
4.4%
Youth
13­
19
yrs
0.000105
3.1%
Adults
20­
49
yrs
0.000136
4.0%
Adults
50+
yrs
0.000145
4.3%
Females
13­
49
yrs
0.000136
4.0%

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

Attachment
17.
Chronic
Residue
Input
Data
for
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Tees,
greens
and
fairways)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.00
DEEM­
FCID
Chronic
analysis
for
TRIADIMEFON
1994­
98
data
Residue
file:
C:\
Documents
and
Settings\
spiper\
SPIPER\
triadimenol\
Triadimefon
chronic
(
3
applications)
tgf.
R98
Adjust.
#
2
used
Analysis
Date
07­
03­
2006
Residue
file
dated:
07­
03­
2006/
08:
24:
57/
8
Reference
dose
(
RfD)
=
0.0034
mg/
kg
bw/
day
Comment:
Food
only
+
Tees
and
greens
and
fairways
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Food
Crop
Residue
Adj.
Factors
Comment
EPA
Code
Grp
Food
Name
(
ppm)
#
1
#
2
­­­­­­­­
­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­­­­­
11000070
11
Apple,
fruit
with
peel
0.000140
1.000
1.000
11000080
11
Apple,
peeled
fruit
0.000140
1.000
1.000
11000081
11
Apple,
peeled
fruit­
babyfood
0.000140
1.000
1.000
11000090
11
Apple,
dried
0.001300
8.000
1.000
11000091
11
Apple,
dried­
babyfood
0.001300
8.000
1.000
11000100
11
Apple,
juice
0.000140
0.600
1.000
11000101
11
Apple,
juice­
babyfood
0.000140
0.600
1.000
11000110
11
Apple,
sauce
0.000140
1.000
1.000
11000111
11
Apple,
sauce­
babyfood
0.000140
1.000
1.000
95001750
O
Grape
0.027000
1.000
1.000
95001760
O
Grape,
juice
0.027000
1.000
1.000
95001761
O
Grape,
juice­
babyfood
0.027000
1.000
1.000
95001770
O
Grape,
leaves
0.027000
1.000
1.000
95001780
O
Grape,
raisin
0.027000
4.000
1.000
95001790
O
Grape,
wine
and
sherry
0.027000
1.000
1.000
11002660
11
Pear
0.001000
1.000
1.000
11002661
11
Pear­
babyfood
0.001000
1.000
1.000
11002670
11
Pear,
dried
0.001000
6.250
1.000
11002680
11
Pear,
juice
0.001000
1.000
1.000
11002681
11
Pear,
juice­
babyfood
0.001000
1.000
1.000
95002790
O
Pineapple
0.001000
1.000
1.000
95002791
O
Pineapple­
babyfood
0.001000
1.000
1.000
95002800
O
Pineapple,
dried
0.001000
5.000
1.000
95002810
O
Pineapple,
juice
0.001000
1.000
1.000
95002811
O
Pineapple,
juice­
babyfood
0.001000
1.000
1.000
13013200
13A
Raspberry
0.024000
1.000
1.000
13013201
13A
Raspberry­
babyfood
0.024000
1.000
1.000
13013210
13A
Raspberry,
juice
0.024000
1.000
1.000
13013211
13A
Raspberry,
juice­
babyfood
0.024000
1.000
1.000
86010000
O
Water,
direct,
all
sources
0.007500
1.000
1.000
86020000
O
Water,
indirect,
all
sources
0.007500
1.000
1.000
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
30
of
36
Attachment
18.
Chronic
Residue
Analysis
for
Triadimefon
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Tees,
greens
and
fairways)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.00
DEEM­
FCID
Chronic
analysis
for
TRIADIMEFON
(
1994­
98
data)
Residue
file
name:
C:\
Documents
and
Settings\
spiper\
SPIPER\
triadimenol\
Triadimefon
chronic
(
3
applications)
tgf.
R98
Adjustment
factor
#
2
used.
Analysis
Date
07­
03­
2006/
08:
25:
11
Residue
file
dated:
07­
03­
2006/
08:
24:
57/
8
Reference
dose
(
RfD,
Chronic)
=
.0034
mg/
kg
bw/
day
COMMENT
1:
Food
only
+
Tees
and
greens
and
fairways
===============================================================================
Total
exposure
by
population
subgroup
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

Total
Exposure
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Population
mg/
kg
Percent
of
Subgroup
body
wt/
day
Rfd
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
U.
S.
Population
(
total)
0.000175
5.1%

U.
S.
Population
(
spring
season)
0.000173
5.1%
U.
S.
Population
(
summer
season)
0.000188
5.5%
U.
S.
Population
(
autumn
season)
0.000169
5.0%
U.
S.
Population
(
winter
season)
0.000170
5.0%

Northeast
region
0.000164
4.8%
Midwest
region
0.000176
5.2%
Southern
region
0.000164
4.8%
Western
region
0.000199
5.9%

Hispanics
0.000192
5.7%
Non­
hispanic
whites
0.000172
5.1%
Non­
hispanic
blacks
0.000164
4.8%
Non­
hisp/
non­
white/
non­
black
0.000206
6.0%

All
infants
(<
1
year)
0.000544
16.0%
Nursing
infants
0.000203
6.0%
Non­
nursing
infants
0.000674
19.8%
Children
1­
6
yrs
0.000284
8.3%
Children
7­
12
yrs
0.000164
4.8%

Females
13­
19
(
not
preg
or
nursing)
0.000120
3.5%
Females
20+
(
not
preg
or
nursing)
0.000170
5.0%
Females
13­
50
yrs
0.000164
4.8%
Females
13+
(
preg/
not
nursing)
0.000161
4.7%
Females
13+
(
nursing)
0.000230
6.8%

Males
13­
19
yrs
0.000123
3.6%
Males
20+
yrs
0.000152
4.5%
Seniors
55+
0.000168
4.9%

Children
1­
2
yrs
0.000326
9.6%
Children
3­
5
yrs
0.000276
8.1%
Children
6­
12
yrs
0.000173
5.1%
Youth
13­
19
yrs
0.000122
3.6%
Adults
20­
49
yrs
0.000158
4.6%
Adults
50+
yrs
0.000168
4.9%
Females
13­
49
yrs
0.000158
4.6%

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
31
of
36
Attachment
19.
Chronic
Residue
Input
Data
for
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Entire
Course)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.00
DEEM­
FCID
Chronic
analysis
for
TRIADIMEFON
1994­
98
data
Residue
file:
C:\
Documents
and
Settings\
spiper\
SPIPER\
triadimenol\
Triadimefon
chronic
(
3
applications)
entiregolf.
R98
Adjust.
#
2
used
Analysis
Date
07­
03­
2006
Residue
file
dated:
07­
03­
2006/
08:
26:
41/
8
Reference
dose
(
RfD)
=
0.0034
mg/
kg
bw/
day
Comment:
Food
only
+
Tees
and
greens
and
entire
course
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Food
Crop
Residue
Adj.
Factors
Comment
EPA
Code
Grp
Food
Name
(
ppm)
#
1
#
2
­­­­­­­­
­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­­­­
­­­­­­­
11000070
11
Apple,
fruit
with
peel
0.000140
1.000
1.000
11000080
11
Apple,
peeled
fruit
0.000140
1.000
1.000
11000081
11
Apple,
peeled
fruit­
babyfood
0.000140
1.000
1.000
11000090
11
Apple,
dried
0.001300
8.000
1.000
11000091
11
Apple,
dried­
babyfood
0.001300
8.000
1.000
11000100
11
Apple,
juice
0.000140
0.600
1.000
11000101
11
Apple,
juice­
babyfood
0.000140
0.600
1.000
11000110
11
Apple,
sauce
0.000140
1.000
1.000
11000111
11
Apple,
sauce­
babyfood
0.000140
1.000
1.000
95001750
O
Grape
0.027000
1.000
1.000
95001760
O
Grape,
juice
0.027000
1.000
1.000
95001761
O
Grape,
juice­
babyfood
0.027000
1.000
1.000
95001770
O
Grape,
leaves
0.027000
1.000
1.000
95001780
O
Grape,
raisin
0.027000
4.000
1.000
95001790
O
Grape,
wine
and
sherry
0.027000
1.000
1.000
11002660
11
Pear
0.001000
1.000
1.000
11002661
11
Pear­
babyfood
0.001000
1.000
1.000
11002670
11
Pear,
dried
0.001000
6.250
1.000
11002680
11
Pear,
juice
0.001000
1.000
1.000
11002681
11
Pear,
juice­
babyfood
0.001000
1.000
1.000
95002790
O
Pineapple
0.001000
1.000
1.000
95002791
O
Pineapple­
babyfood
0.001000
1.000
1.000
95002800
O
Pineapple,
dried
0.001000
5.000
1.000
95002810
O
Pineapple,
juice
0.001000
1.000
1.000
95002811
O
Pineapple,
juice­
babyfood
0.001000
1.000
1.000
13013200
13A
Raspberry
0.024000
1.000
1.000
13013201
13A
Raspberry­
babyfood
0.024000
1.000
1.000
13013210
13A
Raspberry,
juice
0.024000
1.000
1.000
13013211
13A
Raspberry,
juice­
babyfood
0.024000
1.000
1.000
86010000
O
Water,
direct,
all
sources
0.022000
1.000
1.000
86020000
O
Water,
indirect,
all
sources
0.022000
1.000
1.000
Attachment
20.
Chronic
Residue
Analysis
for
Triadimefon
Food
and
Drinking
Water
(
Entire
Course)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Ver.
2.00
DEEM­
FCID
Chronic
analysis
for
TRIADIMEFON
(
1994­
98
data)
Residue
file
name:
C:\
Documents
and
Settings\
spiper\
SPIPER\
triadimenol\
Triadimefon
chronic
(
3
applications)
entiregolf.
R98
Adjustment
factor
#
2
used.
Analysis
Date
07­
03­
2006/
08:
26:
54
Residue
file
dated:
07­
03­
2006/
08:
26:
41/
8
Reference
dose
(
RfD,
Chronic)
=
.0034
mg/
kg
bw/
day
COMMENT
1:
Food
only
+
Tees
and
greens
and
entire
course
===============================================================================
Total
exposure
by
population
subgroup
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

Total
Exposure
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Population
mg/
kg
Percent
of
Subgroup
body
wt/
day
Rfd
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
32
of
36
U.
S.
Population
(
total)
0.000480
14.1%

U.
S.
Population
(
spring
season)
0.000476
14.0%
U.
S.
Population
(
summer
season)
0.000516
15.2%
U.
S.
Population
(
autumn
season)
0.000464
13.7%
U.
S.
Population
(
winter
season)
0.000465
13.7%

Northeast
region
0.000443
13.0%
Midwest
region
0.000485
14.3%
Southern
region
0.000455
13.4%
Western
region
0.000549
16.2%

Hispanics
0.000539
15.9%
Non­
hispanic
whites
0.000470
13.8%
Non­
hispanic
blacks
0.000454
13.4%
Non­
hisp/
non­
white/
non­
black
0.000580
17.1%

All
infants
(<
1
year)
0.001546
45.5%
Nursing
infants
0.000574
16.9%
Non­
nursing
infants
0.001915
56.3%
Children
1­
6
yrs
0.000711
20.9%
Children
7­
12
yrs
0.000441
13.0%

Females
13­
19
(
not
preg
or
nursing)
0.000335
9.9%
Females
20+
(
not
preg
or
nursing)
0.000475
14.0%
Females
13­
50
yrs
0.000460
13.5%
Females
13+
(
preg/
not
nursing)
0.000458
13.5%
Females
13+
(
nursing)
0.000653
19.2%

Males
13­
19
yrs
0.000348
10.2%
Males
20+
yrs
0.000425
12.5%
Seniors
55+
0.000468
13.8%

Children
1­
2
yrs
0.000780
22.9%
Children
3­
5
yrs
0.000701
20.6%
Children
6­
12
yrs
0.000466
13.7%
Youth
13­
19
yrs
0.000343
10.1%
Adults
20­
49
yrs
0.000443
13.0%
Adults
50+
yrs
0.000468
13.8%
Females
13­
49
yrs
0.000442
13.0%

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

Attachment
21.
Acute
Food
Only
Critical
Exposure
Contribution
Analysis
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
DEEM­
FCID
Acute
Critical
Exposure
Contribution
Analysis
(
Ver
2.02)
CSFII
1994­
98
Residue
file
=
C:\
Documents
and
Settings\
spiper\
SPIPER\
triadimenol\
Triadimefon
acute
(
3
applications)
6
27
2006
FOOD
ONLY.
R98
Date
and
time
of
analysis:
07­
03­
2006
08:
33:
15
Daily
totals
for
food
and
foodform
consumption
used.
Adjustment
factor
#
2
used.
Minimum
exposure
contribution
=
10%
Monte
Carlo
Iterations
=
1000
Seed
=
10
CEC
records
generated
for
first
97
iterations.
Exposures
divided
by
body
weight
Subpopulations:
1
U.
S.
Population
2
All
infants
3
Children
1­
2
yrs
4
Children
3­
5
yrs
5
Children
6­
12
yrs
================================================================================
U.
S.
Population
Low
percentile
for
CEC
records:
99
Exposure
(
mg/
day)
=
0.000097
High
percentile
for
CEC
records:
100
Exposure
(
mg/
day)
=
0.107936
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
33
of
36
Number
of
actual
records
in
this
interval:
82168
Critical
foods/
foodforms
for
this
population
(
as
derived
from
these
records):
N=
number
of
appearances
in
all
records
(
including
duplicates)
%=
percent
of
total
exposure
for
all
records
(
including
duplicates)

Food
FF
N
Percent
Food
Name
­­­­­­­­
­­­
­­­­­
­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­
95002810
110
20290
20.15%
Pineapple,
juice­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
95001760
110
4600
15.46%
Grape,
juice­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
95001760
240
6441
11.49%
Grape,
juice­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
95002810
240
23891
9.32%
Pineapple,
juice­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
95001750
110
4695
8.39%
Grape­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
95002790
240
13411
7.47%
Pineapple­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
================================================================================
All
infants
Low
percentile
for
CEC
records:
99
Exposure
(
mg/
day)
=
0.000231
High
percentile
for
CEC
records:
100
Exposure
(
mg/
day)
=
0.081150
Number
of
actual
records
in
this
interval:
2816
Critical
foods/
foodforms
for
this
population
(
as
derived
from
these
records):
N=
number
of
appearances
in
all
records
(
including
duplicates)
%=
percent
of
total
exposure
for
all
records
(
including
duplicates)

Food
FF
N
Percent
Food
Name
­­­­­­­­
­­­
­­­­­
­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­
95001761
240
327
17.43%
Grape,
juice­
babyfood­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
95002810
110
582
17.40%
Pineapple,
juice­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
95001760
240
133
14.41%
Grape,
juice­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
95002810
240
596
10.04%
Pineapple,
juice­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
95001760
110
122
9.84%
Grape,
juice­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
11002661
240
447
8.66%
Pear­
babyfood­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
PID
HH­
Indiv
Day
Sex
Age
Bw­
kg
NF
NX
Tot
Expos
Samplwt
================================================================================

Children
1­
2
yrs
Low
percentile
for
CEC
records:
99
Exposure
(
mg/
day)
=
0.000446
High
percentile
for
CEC
records:
100
Exposure
(
mg/
day)
=
0.107936
Number
of
actual
records
in
this
interval:
4133
Critical
foods/
foodforms
for
this
population
(
as
derived
from
these
records):
N=
number
of
appearances
in
all
records
(
including
duplicates)
%=
percent
of
total
exposure
for
all
records
(
including
duplicates)

Food
FF
N
Percent
Food
Name
­­­­­­­­
­­­
­­­­­
­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­
95001760
110
784
31.11%
Grape,
juice­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
95002810
110
1442
18.61%
Pineapple,
juice­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
95001760
240
561
14.96%
Grape,
juice­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
95001780
130
298
10.35%
Grape,
raisin­
Uncooked;
Dried;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
95001750
110
261
7.99%
Grape­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
95002790
240
462
3.46%
Pineapple­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
95002810
240
882
3.35%
Pineapple,
juice­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
================================================================================
Children
3­
5
yrs
Low
percentile
for
CEC
records:
99
Exposure
(
mg/
day)
=
0.000268
High
percentile
for
CEC
records:
100
Exposure
(
mg/
day)
=
0.079252
Number
of
actual
records
in
this
interval:
9597
Critical
foods/
foodforms
for
this
population
(
as
derived
from
these
records):
N=
number
of
appearances
in
all
records
(
including
duplicates)
%=
percent
of
total
exposure
for
all
records
(
including
duplicates)

Food
FF
N
Percent
Food
Name
­­­­­­­­
­­­
­­­­­
­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­
95001760
110
1388
22.98%
Grape,
juice­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
34
of
36
95002810
110
2996
17.69%
Pineapple,
juice­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
95001760
240
1538
17.47%
Grape,
juice­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
95001750
110
882
13.76%
Grape­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
95001780
130
529
7.90%
Grape,
raisin­
Uncooked;
Dried;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
95002790
240
1096
5.37%
Pineapple­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
95002810
240
1801
3.29%
Pineapple,
juice­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
13013200
240
300
2.28%
Raspberry­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
================================================================================
Children
6­
12
yrs
Low
percentile
for
CEC
records:
99
Exposure
(
mg/
day)
=
0.000139
High
percentile
for
CEC
records:
100
Exposure
(
mg/
day)
=
0.033388
Number
of
actual
records
in
this
interval:
4718
Critical
foods/
foodforms
for
this
population
(
as
derived
from
these
records):
N=
number
of
appearances
in
all
records
(
including
duplicates)
%=
percent
of
total
exposure
for
all
records
(
including
duplicates)

Food
FF
N
Percent
Food
Name
­­­­­­­­
­­­
­­­­­
­­­­­­­
­­­­­­­­­­­­­
95002810
110
1959
24.90%
Pineapple,
juice­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
95001760
110
472
18.71%
Grape,
juice­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
95001760
240
482
13.87%
Grape,
juice­
Cooked;
Canned;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
95001750
110
337
10.99%
Grape­
Uncooked;
Fresh
or
N/
S;
Cook
Meth
N/
S
Attachment
22.
Usage
Report
in
Support
of
Reregistration
for
Triadimefon.

Triadimefon
(
109901)
Screening
Level
Usage
Analysis
(
SLUA)
Date:
6/
2/
05
What
is
a
Screening
Level
Usage
Analysis
(
SLUA)?
·
Available
estimates
of
pesticide
usage
data
for
a
particular
active
ingredient
that
is
used
on
agricultural
crops
in
the
United
States.

What
does
it
contain?
·
Pesticide
usage
data
for
a
single
active
ingredient
only.
·
Agricultural
use
sites
(
crops)
that
the
pesticide
is
reported
to
be
used
on.
·
Available
pesticide
usage
information
(
i.
e.,
does
not
include
all
of
the
United
States).
·
Annual
percent
of
crop
treated
(
average
&
maximum)
for
each
agricultural
crop.
·
Average
annual
pounds
of
the
pesticide
applied
for
each
agricultural
crop
(
i.
e.,
for
the
states
surveyed,
not
for
the
entire
United
States).

What
assumptions
can
I
make
about
the
reported
data?
·
Average
pounds
of
active
ingredient
applied
­
Values
are
calculated
by
merging
pesticide
usage
data
sources
together;
averaging
by
year,
averaging
across
all
years,
&
then
rounding.
Note:
If
the
estimated
value
is
less
than
500,
then
that
value
is
labeled
<
500.
Estimated
values
between
500
&
<
1,000,000
are
rounded
to
1
significant
digit.
Estimated
values
of
1,000,000
or
greater
are
rounded
to
2
significant
digits.)
·
Average
percent
of
crop
treated
­
Values
are
calculated
by
merging
data
sources
together;
averaging
by
year,
averaging
across
all
years,
&
rounding
to
the
nearest
multiple
of
5.
Note:
If
the
estimated
value
is
less
than
1,
then
the
value
is
labeled
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
35
of
36
<
1.
·
Maximum
percent
of
crop
treated
­
Value
is
the
single
maximum
value
reported
across
all
data
sources,
across
all
years,
&
rounded
up
to
the
nearest
multiple
of
5.
Note:
If
the
estimated
value
is
less
than
2.5,
then
the
value
is
labeled
<
2.5.

What
are
the
data
sources
used?
·
USDA­
NASS
(
United
States
Department
of
Agriculture's
National
Agricultural
Statistics
Service)
 
pesticide
usage
data
from
1998
to
2003.
·
NCFAP
(
National
Center
for
Food
and
Agricultural
Policy)
 
pesticide
usage
data
from
1997
&
is
only
used
if
data
is
not
available
from
the
other
sources.
·
Private
pesticide
market
research
 
pesticide
usage
data
from
1998
to
2003.
·
California
DPR
data
can
be
requested
separately.

What
are
the
limitations
to
the
data?
·
Additional
registered
uses
may
exist
but
are
not
included
because
the
available
surveys
do
not
report
usage
(
e.
g.,
small
acreage
crops).
·
Lack
of
reported
usage
data
for
the
pesticide
on
a
crop
does
not
imply
zero
usage.
·
Usage
data
on
a
particular
site
may
be
noted
in
data
sources,
but
not
quantified.
·
In
these
instances,
the
site
would
not
be
reported
in
the
SLUA.
·
Non­
agricultural
use
sites
(
e.
g.,
turf,
post­
harvest,
mosquito
control,
etc.)
are
not
reported
in
the
SLUA.
A
separate
request
must
be
made
to
receive
these
estimates.

Who
do
I
contact
for
further
information
and/
or
questions
on
this
SLUA?
·
(
Jenna
Carter,
Botanist,
BEAD)/(
John
O'Neill,
Analyst,
BEAD)
·
((
703)
308­
8370,
carter.
jenna@
epa.
gov)/
((
703)
308­
8118,
Oneill.
John
@
epa.
gov)

Tuesday,
May
31,
2005
13:
46
Screening
Level
Estimates
of
Agricultural
Uses
of
Triadimefon
(
109901)
Sorted
Alphabetically
Crop
Lbs.
A.
I.
Percent
Crop
Treated
Avg.
Max.
1
Almonds
<
500
<
1
<
2.5
2
Apples
4,000
5
10
3
Artichokes
(
NCFAP
'
97)
<
500
30
4
Asparagus
(
NCFAP
'
97)
<
500
15
5
Cabbage
(
NCFAP
'
97)
<
500
10
6
Cantaloupes
<
500
<
1
10
7
Cherries
<
500
<
1
<
2.5
8
Cucumbers
<
500
<
1
<
2.5
9
Grapes
1,000
<
1
5
10
Honeydew
<
500
5
5
11
Pears
1,000
5
5
12
Pumpkins
1,000
5
15
13
Raspberries
(
NCFAP
'
97)
<
500
50
Triadimefon
Dietary
Exposure
Assessment
­
RED
DP
Barcode:
314778
Page
36
of
36
14
Squash
<
500
<
1
5
15
Sugar
Beets
<
500
<
1
<
2.5
16
Watermelons
<
500
<
1
5
17
Wheat
1,000
<
1
<
2.5
______________________________________

All
numbers
rounded.
'<
500'
indicates
less
than
500
pounds
of
active
ingredient.
'<
2.5'
indicates
less
than
2.5
percent
of
crop
is
treated.