Document ID: SEC-2010-2023-0001
Agency: sec
Document Type: Notice
Title: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes: NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.
Posted Date: 2010-12-29T05:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 82098-82106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32731]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-63597; File No. SR-BX-2010-059]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of 
Filing of Amendment No. 1 to Proposed Rule Change To Create a Listing 
Market on the Exchange

December 22, 2010.
    On August 20, 2010, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (the ``Exchange'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission''), 
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change 
to create a listing market on the Exchange. The proposed rule change 
was published for comment in the Federal Register on September 8, 
2010.\3\ The Commission received three comments on the proposal.\4\ The 
Commission subsequently extended the time period in which to either 
approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, 
or institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the 
proposed rule change, to December 7, 2010.\5\ On December 6, 2010, the 
Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change as described 
in Items I and II below, which items have been prepared by the 
Exchange. On December 7, 2010, the Commission instituted proceedings to 
determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change, as modified 
by Amendment No. 1.\6\ Although the Order Instituting Proceedings 
included a summary of Amendment No. 1, the Commission is publishing the 
full text of Amendment No. 1 for the benefit of interested persons who 
wish to comment on the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62818 (September 1, 
2010), 75 FR 54665 (``Notice'').
    \4\ See Letters to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Commission, 
from Tom A. Alberg, Managing Director and Founder, Madrona Venture 
Group, dated December 1, 2010; Michael R. Trocchio, Bingham 
McCutchen LLP, dated October 3, 2010; and William F. Galvin, 
Secretary of the Commonwealth, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, dated 
September 28, 2010. For a summary of these comments, see Securities 
Exchange Act Release No. 63448 (December 7, 2010), 75 FR 77036 
(December 10, 2010) (``Order Instituting Proceedings'').
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63105 (October 14, 
2010), 75 FR 64772 (October 20, 2010).
    \6\ See Order Instituting Proceedings, supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of Amendment No. 1 to the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to create a listing market, which will be 
called ``BX'' [sic].\7\ Following Commission approval, the Exchange 
will announce the operational date of the new market in an Equity 
Trader Alert and press release. The proposed rules will become 
effective on the operational date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The Commission notes that BX has proposed, in this Amendment 
No. 1, to name the new listing market as ``The BX Venture Market,'' 
rather than ``BX.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available at http://nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com, at BX's principal office, and at the 
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    In connection with the acquisition of the former Boston Stock 
Exchange by The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc., the Exchange discontinued its 
listing marketplace and delisted all securities previously listed on 
the Exchange.\8\ Since January 2009, the Exchange has operated as a 
trading venue only, allowing market participants to trade securities 
listed on other national securities exchanges pursuant to unlisted 
trading privileges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59265 (January 16, 
2009), 74 FR 4790 (January 27, 2009) (approving SR-BSE-2008-36 
relating to the delisting of all securities from the Exchange in 
connection with the Exchange's discontinuation of trading).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is proposing to begin listing securities again, 
through the creation of a new listing market, to be called ``The BX 
Venture Market.'' The BX Venture Market will have minimal quantitative 
listing standards, but have qualitative requirements, which are, in

[[Page 82099]]

many respects, similar to those required for listing on The NASDAQ 
Stock Market (``Nasdaq'') and other national securities exchanges.\9\ 
The Exchange believes that this market will provide an attractive 
alternative to companies being delisted from another national 
securities exchange for failure to meet quantitative listing standards 
(including price or other market value measures) and to smaller 
companies contemplating an initial exchange listing. The Exchange 
further believes that the proposed listing venue will provide a 
transparent, well-regulated marketplace for these companies and their 
investors.\10\ As is currently the case with respect to the trading 
occurring on the Exchange pursuant to unlisted trading privileges, 
FINRA will regulate market activity and staff of the Exchange will 
monitor real-time trading of securities listed on the BX Venture 
Market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The Exchange notes that not all qualitative requirements 
imposed by other exchanges would be required. See Listing 
Requirements, infra, for a full discussion of the proposed 
quantitative and qualitative requirements for listing on BX.
    \10\ The Exchange will propose in a separate rule filing changes 
to the BX Equities Platform to govern trading of, and reporting of 
transactions in, these listed securities and introducing and 
modifying market data products to permit dissemination of accurate 
quotation information and reporting of transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange will disseminate quotation and transaction information 
about securities listed on the BX Venture Market via several market 
data products to ensure broad dissemination of quotation and last sale 
information consistent with that provided by the network processors for 
national market system securities. This information will include a 
market center identifier and the Exchange will adopt a display 
requirement such that data vendors who receive data from the Exchange 
will have to identify when the BX Venture Market is the listing market 
for a security and clearly differentiate those securities from 
securities listed on Nasdaq or other exchanges or traded over-the-
counter when displaying information to external users on their single 
security quotation screens.
    The Exchange is also committed to ensuring that quotations and 
transaction information from BX are consolidated fully with similar 
information from over-the-counter quoting and trading that FINRA 
supervises, and is working with FINRA in that regard.
    The assignment of symbols for companies listed on the BX Venture 
Market will be governed by the existing National Market System Plan for 
the Selection and Reservation of Securities Symbols, which is the 
exclusive means of allocating and using trading symbols. Pursuant to 
that Plan, securities listed on the BX Venture Market, like every other 
national securities exchange today, are eligible to have a trading 
symbol of from [sic] one to five characters. This eligibility is 
important because the BX Venture Market is intended to afford a listing 
venue for companies formerly listed on other national securities 
exchanges, which will want to retain their symbols.\11\ In approving 
the symbology Plan, the Commission distinguished securities listed on 
an exchange, which can trade with a symbol of from [sic] one to five 
characters, from those trading over the counter, which can trade only 
with a four or five character symbol, noting that ``[e]xchange listing 
standards are approved by the Commission and must include corporate 
governance requirements that comply with Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange 
[sic] Act. Issuers traded on over-the-counter equity venues (including 
the OTCBB and Pink Sheets) are not subject to such listing standards.'' 
\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The Commission found that allowing all exchanges to utilize 
from one to five characters minimizes investor confusion when a 
company changes its listing from one venue to another. Securities 
Exchange Act Release No. 58904 (November 6, 2008), 73 FR 67218 at 
67227 (November 13, 2008) (``The Commission finds that allowing the 
automatic portability of a symbol in the event that an issuer 
transfers its listing to another exchange will further the purposes 
of the Act and should reduce investor confusion by allowing the 
symbol already associated with the issuer to continue to be used by 
the issuer on the new exchange.''). The Commission also noted that 
the portability feature of the plan would promote ``competition 
among listing markets, including potential new listing markets.'' 
Id. at 67224 (emphasis added).
    \12\ Id. at 67225 (footnotes omitted). The Exchange notes that 
it will have listing standards approved by the Commission, including 
corporate governance requirements that comply with Rule 10A-3, and 
go far beyond those requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Listing Requirements
    The BX Venture Market would list Common Stock, Preferred Stock, 
Ordinary Shares, Shares or Certificates of Beneficial Interest of 
Trust, Limited Partnership Interests, American Depositary Receipts 
(ADR), American Depositary Shares (ADS), Units, Rights and Warrants. To 
be listed on the BX Venture Market, companies will need to meet the 
following qualitative listing standards, each of which is equivalent to 
the comparable listing standard of Nasdaq or is derived from the 
Federal securities laws:
    (a) The company must be registered under Section 12(b) of the Act 
\13\ and current in its periodic filings with the Commission and, as a 
result, subject to the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 
\14\ (proposed Rule 5210(a) [sic] \15\);
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78l(b).
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 7201-7266.
    \15\ The Commission notes that the correct reference should be 
proposed Rule 5210(a) and 5210(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (b) The company must have a fully independent Audit Committee 
comprised of at least three members and comply with the requirements of 
SEC Rule 10A-3, promulgated under the Act \16\ (proposed Rule 5605(c));
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 240.10A-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (c) The company must have independent directors make compensation 
decisions for executive officers (proposed Rule 5605(d));
    (d) The company will be prohibited from taking any corporate action 
with the effect of nullifying, restricting or disparately reducing the 
per share voting rights of holders of an outstanding class of the 
company's common stock registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Act 
(proposed Rule 5640);
    (e) The company's auditor will be required to be registered with 
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board \17\ (proposed Rules 
5210(b) and 5250(c)(3));
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Section 102 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 15 U.S.C. 7212.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (f) The company will be required to hold an annual shareholders' 
meeting and solicit proxies for each shareholders' meeting (proposed 
Rule 5620);
    (g) The company will be required to obtain shareholder approval for 
the use of equity compensation (proposed Rule 5635);
    (h) The company will be required to adopt a code of conduct, 
applicable to all directors, officers and employees (proposed Rule 
5610);
    (i) The company will be required to conduct an appropriate review 
and oversight of all related party transactions, to address potential 
conflict of interest situations (proposed Rule 5630);
    (j) The company will be required to disclose material information 
through any Regulation FD compliant method (or combination of methods) 
(proposed Rule 5250(b) and IM-5250-1);
    (k) The listed securities must be eligible for a Direct 
Registration Program operated by a clearing agency registered under 
Section 17A of the Act \18\ (proposed Rules 5210(c) and 5255);
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (l) Public ``shells'' would not be allowed to list (proposed Rule 
5101); and
    (m) The Exchange will conduct a public interest review of the 
company and significant persons associated with

[[Page 82100]]

it (proposed Rule 5101 and IM-5101-1). A company would not be eligible 
for listing if any executive officer or director was involved in any 
event that occurred during the prior five years that is required to be 
disclosed under Item 401(f)(2)--(8) of Regulation S-K.
    In addition, the BX Venture Market would apply the following 
quantitative listing standards, set out in proposed Rules 5505 (initial 
listing) and 5550 (continued listing), which are designed to assure a 
minimum level of trading consistent with a public market for the 
securities:
    (a) 200,000 publicly held shares;
    (b) 200 public shareholders, at least 100 of which must be round 
lot holders for initial listing, and 200 public shareholders for 
continued listing;
    (c) A market value of listed securities of at least $2 million for 
initial listing and $1 million for continued listing;
    (d) Two market makers; and
    (e) A minimum initial listing price of $0.25 per share for 
securities previously listed on a national securities exchange and 
$1.00 per share for securities previously quoted in the over-the-
counter market. For continued listing, securities will be required to 
maintain a minimum $0.25 per share bid price.

Further, with respect to companies not previously listed on a national 
securities exchange, the BX Venture Market will also require for 
initial listing that the company have either $1 million stockholders' 
equity or $5 million total assets, a one year operating history, and a 
plan to maintain sufficient working capital for the company's planned 
business for at least twelve months after the first day of listing.
    The Exchange would also require that rights and warrants will only 
be eligible for initial and continued listing if the underlying 
security is listed on the BX Venture Market or is a covered security, 
as described in Section 18(b) of the Securities Act of 1933.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 77r(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed listing standards are designed to allow companies that 
are being delisted from another national securities exchange for 
failure to meet that exchange's quantitative listing requirements the 
opportunity to provide their investors with a better regulated, more 
transparent trading environment than may otherwise be available in the 
over-the-counter markets. In addition, the Exchange believes that 
allowing these companies to continue trading on a national securities 
exchange may enable some institutional investors to continue their 
ownership stake in the company, which could provide greater stability 
to the company's shareholder base and possibly avoid forced sales by 
such investors.\20\ The Exchange also believes that companies currently 
traded over-the-counter could view this market as an aspirational step 
towards a listing on another national securities exchange. The Exchange 
believes that the agreement of such companies to comply with the 
Exchange's corporate governance standards and the application of the 
Exchange's public interest authority will provide additional 
protections to their investors than would be available in their present 
trading venue. Moreover, the Exchange believes that a listing on the BX 
Venture Market could help such companies raise capital, in turn 
promoting job creation within the United States. Finally, the Exchange 
believes that the BX Venture Market will be a more attractive 
alternative to domestic companies that might otherwise have considered 
a listing on non-U.S. junior markets, which generally have lower 
listing requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ Many institutional investors have investment policies that 
limit their ownership to securities listed on a national securities 
exchange, or that prohibit the ownership of securities that only are 
traded in the over-the-counter market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nonetheless, the Exchange recognizes that the listing requirements 
for the BX Venture Market will be lower than those of the NASDAQ Stock 
Market and other national securities exchanges, and that the market 
will, therefore, attract smaller, less liquid companies, which may 
create higher risks for investors. As such, to avoid investor 
confusion, we will make every effort to distinguish the proposed BX 
Venture Market from the NASDAQ Stock Market, which is also owned by the 
NASDAQ OMX Group. In that regard, the listing rules of the BX Venture 
Market will specify that a BX Venture Market-listed company should 
refer to its listing as on the BX Venture Market, unless otherwise 
required by applicable rules or regulations, and that such company 
should never represent that it is listed on The NASDAQ Stock Market. To 
enforce this prohibition, the Exchange will monitor the press releases 
issued by a BX Venture Market-listed company and will annually review 
the company's Web site to determine how the company is referring to its 
listing. Similarly, in describing this listing venue, the Exchange will 
generally refer to it as the BX Venture Market and not as NASDAQ OMX 
BX. The Exchange will also include information on its Web site 
describing the differences between the BX Venture Market and other 
national securities exchanges, including Nasdaq. Finally, as noted 
earlier, the Exchange will require data vendors to identify when the BX 
Venture Market is the listing market for a security and clearly 
differentiate those securities from securities listed on Nasdaq or 
other exchanges or traded over-the-counter when displaying information 
to external users on their single security quotation screens.
    The BX Venture Market will not initially list a company if an 
executive officer or director of the company was involved in any event 
that occurred during the prior five years that is required to be 
disclosed under Item 401(f)(2)--(8) of Regulation S-K.\21\ These events 
include criminal convictions and pending charges, violations of 
securities laws, and court or administrative actions barring or 
limiting the individual from certain security related activities. 
Similarly, the Exchange will review proxy statements and other public 
filings of listed companies. If a listed company discloses a proceeding 
against an executive officer or director under Item 401(f)(2)--(8) of 
Regulation S-K, the Exchange would provide the company with thirty days 
to remove the executive officer or director. If the company does not do 
so, the Exchange would send a delisting notification to the company.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 17 CFR 229.401(f)(2)-(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange will have the discretionary authority to 
deny listing to or delist any otherwise qualified security when 
necessary to preserve and strengthen the quality of and public 
confidence in its market. Proposed IM-5101-1 provides a non-exclusive 
description of circumstances where the Exchange may exercise that 
discretion, including when an individual associated with the company 
has a history of regulatory misconduct that does not implicate the 
automatic bar described above. This would arise, for example, where an 
executive officer or director has reported misconduct that occurred 
between five and ten years before the disclosure or misconduct not 
required to be disclosed under Item 401 of Regulation S-K. This would 
also arise when an individual who is not an executive officer or 
director, but who has significant influence on or importance to the 
company, has a history of regulatory misconduct. In that regard, the 
Exchange ordinarily would apply its discretionary authority to deny 
initial or continued listing to a company if a control person, such as 
a significant shareholder, has a regulatory history, which is required 
to be disclosed under Item 401(g) of Regulation S-K.\22\ In

[[Page 82101]]

order to apply this authority, the Exchange intends to conduct 
background investigations of executive officers and directors and other 
significant people associated with a company in connection with its 
review of applications for initial listing, as well as whenever a new 
executive officer or director is associated with a BX Venture Market-
listed company, using public databases, such as Lexis-Nexis. The 
Exchange will also retain outside firms to assist in its review as 
needed, including investigative, accounting and law firms. In that 
regard, the Exchange expects that it would especially rely on outside 
firms when researching a regulatory history that may have occurred in 
jurisdictions outside of the United States, where the availability of 
information and language barriers could otherwise complicate such 
research. The Exchange's listing application will also solicit 
information about certain inquiries, investigations, lawsuits, 
litigation, arbitrations, hearings, or other legal or administrative 
proceedings against the Company and its executive officers, directors, 
and ten percent or greater shareholders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ The Exchange may, however, in rare circumstances, permit 
the listing of a company if, for example, the shareholder did not 
acquire its shares directly from the company and has no role in the 
management or operations of the company.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The head of the Exchange's Listing Department, who will have no 
marketing responsibilities and will report to NASDAQ OMX's Chief 
Regulatory Officer, will be involved in all decisions concerning 
whether to permit or deny listing to a company based on a public 
interest concern and the Exchange's Chief Regulatory Officer will be 
required to approve the listing of any company that has disclosed 
information about an executive officer, director, or control person 
under Items 401(f)(2)-(8) or 401(g) of Regulation S-K that does not 
trigger the automatic bar described above.
    The Exchange will not approve for initial listing, or allow the 
continued listing, of shell companies.\23\ This prohibition is based on 
concerns that the investors in shell companies are unaware of the 
ultimate business in which they are investing and that trading in such 
securities is more susceptible to market manipulation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ Proposed Rule 5101 sets forth a number of factors that the 
Exchange will consider in determining whether a Company is a shell, 
including whether the Company is considered a ``shell company'' as 
defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Act, 17 CFR 240.12b-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    BX listings and delistings will be processed by the same staff 
currently in Nasdaq's Listing Qualifications Department, which 
presently includes 13 continued listing analysts and four initial 
listing analysts. This staff is extremely experienced in regulatory 
analysis, with the average person having over ten years of experience 
at Nasdaq. Should the workload resulting from the new BX Venture Market 
prove sufficiently high, the Exchange and Nasdaq have each committed to 
hiring additional staff, as necessary. In that regard, the staffing 
within Listing Qualifications is now, and will continue to be, reviewed 
regularly by Nasdaq's Chief Regulatory Officer and Regulatory Oversight 
Committee and will also be reviewed by the Exchange's Regulatory 
Oversight Committee.
    The Exchange proposes that any company that meets the quantitative 
(e.g., financial) requirements for listing on Nasdaq will not be 
allowed to initially list on the BX Venture Market. This will assure 
that such companies only become listed on the exchange with higher 
listing standards.
    Given that the Exchange expects to list companies that do not meet 
the quantitative listing requirements of the primary existing national 
securities exchanges, it is expected that BX Venture Market-listed 
companies will include smaller companies and companies facing business 
or other challenges. Thus, the proposed quantitative standards for the 
BX Venture Market were deliberately structured to be lower than those 
of the other primary exchanges. In that regard, the minimum price 
requirement for listing on the BX Venture Market will be $0.25 per 
share for a security previously listed on another national securities 
exchange and $1.00 per share for a security previously quoted in the 
over-the-counter market or listing in connection with its initial 
public offering. Until September 30, 2011, the Exchange would consider 
any company that was listed on another national securities exchange at 
any time since January 1, 2008, to be eligible to list with a $0.25 per 
share price. The Exchange believes it appropriate to consider a company 
delisted since January 1, 2008, as previously quoted on another 
national securities exchange because the BX Venture Market would not 
have been available to such companies when they were delisted. The 
Exchange believes it is reasonable to look back to January 1, 2008, 
when the financial markets began facing difficulties, which resulted in 
an unusually large number of companies being delisted. Furthermore, the 
Exchange believes it is appropriate to continue this treatment until 
September 30, 2011, to assure that such companies have an adequate 
opportunity to learn about the BX Venture Market and sufficient time to 
complete their application and have that application processed by the 
Exchange. After September 30, 2011, a company will be considered to 
have been previously listed on a national securities exchange, and 
therefore eligible to list with a $0.25 per share price, only if it was 
listed on such an exchange at any time during the three months prior to 
its listing on the BX Venture Market. The Exchange believes that this 
three month period will allow the company sufficient time to apply for 
listing on the BX Venture Market and have its application processed.
    For continued listing, a security will be required to maintain a 
minimum $0.25 per share bid price.\24\ If the security does not 
maintain a minimum $0.25 per share bid price for 20 consecutive trading 
days, Exchange staff would issue a Staff Delisting Determination and 
the security would be suspended from trading on the BX Venture 
Market.\25\ A company could appeal that determination to a Hearings 
Panel; however, such an appeal would not stay the suspension of the 
security.\26\ During the Hearings Panel process, the security could 
regain compliance by achieving a $0.25 per share minimum bid price 
while trading on another venue, such as the over-the-counter market, 
for ten consecutive days. However, if the company has received three or 
more Staff Delisting Determinations for failure to comply with minimum 
price requirement in the prior 12 months, the company could only regain 
compliance by achieving a closing bid price of $0.25 per share or more 
for at least 20 consecutive trading days. The Exchange believes that 
this higher requirement for companies that were previously non-
compliant is appropriate to reduce the likelihood of future instances 
of non-compliance and the concomitant investor confusion concerning the 
ability of the company to remain listed. If the Hearings Panel 
determines that the security has satisfied the applicable standard to 
regain compliance, the trading halt would be terminated and the 
security would resume trading on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ The Exchange notes there is also no price requirement for 
initial or continued listing on the National Stock Exchange or for 
continued listing on NYSE Amex and therefore that the proposed 
continued listing requirement exceeds the requirement of those 
exchanges.
    \25\ Proposed Rule 4120(a)(12).
    \26\ Proposed Rule 5815(a)(1)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To be eligible for initial listing, a company not previously listed 
on a national securities exchange must have at least one year operating 
history, a minimum of either $1 million in

[[Page 82102]]

stockholders' equity or $5 million in total assets, and demonstrate 
that it has a plan to maintain sufficient working capital for its 
planned business for at least twelve months after the first day of 
listing. The Exchange believes that these requirements will help assure 
that a company that was not previously subject to exchange regulation 
nonetheless has a credible and sustainable business.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed public float, holder and 
market maker requirements, together with the minimum market value of 
listed securities requirement, will assure sufficient liquidity in 
listed securities. In that regard, the Exchange notes that the 
shareholder and publicly held shares requirements are comparable to, or 
higher than, requirements for listing a preferred stock or secondary 
class of common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market, which require 100 
round lot shareholders and 200,000 publicly held shares. The Exchange 
is not aware of any difficulties in the trading in securities meeting 
these requirements. Further, requiring two market makers will assure 
competing quotations for potential buyers and sellers of the securities 
listed on the BX Venture Market. Finally, the Exchange believes that 
the minimum market value of listed securities requirement will help 
assure that the company issuing the securities is of a sufficient size 
to generate interest from investors and market participants. While 
these proposed standards may be lower than those of other exchanges, 
investors will be protected by the fact that securities listed on the 
BX Venture Market would be considered penny stocks under Exchange Act 
Rule 3a51-1, unless they qualify for an exemption from the definition 
of a penny stock.\27\ As such, broker-dealers would be required to pre-
approve their customers for trading in penny stocks and investors will 
obtain the disclosures required to be made by broker-dealers in 
connection with penny stock transactions, providing them with trade and 
market information prior to effecting a transaction. Further, there 
will be no ``blue sky'' exemption available under Section 18 of the 
Securities Act of 1933,\28\ so companies will be required to satisfy 
State law registration requirements and other State laws that regulate 
the sale and offering of securities. Because some State laws and 
regulations may provide an exemption from certain registration or 
``blue sky'' requirements for companies listed on the former Boston 
Stock Exchange, based on the higher listing standards previously 
applied by that Exchange, proposed Rule 5001 would provide that the 
Exchange will take action to delist any company listed on BX that 
attempts to rely on such an exemption. Companies will also agree not to 
rely on any such exemption as a provision of the BX Listing Agreement. 
Listed companies will be required to represent to the Exchange that 
they are not relying on any such exemption in connection with any 
securities offering and will be required to provide the Exchange with 
copies of any ``blue sky memoranda'' prepared in connection with the 
issuance of shares.\29\ These steps will allow the Exchange to assure 
that the company is not inappropriately relying on such an exemption.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ 17 CFR 240.3a51-1. The Exchange is not seeking an exemption 
from the penny stock rules for securities listed on BX; however, a 
security may be excluded from the definition of a penny stock as a 
result of the security having a price in excess of $5 or its issuer 
having net tangible assets in excess of $2 million (if the issuer 
has been in continuous operation for at least three years) or $5 
million (if the issuer has been in continuous operation for less 
than three years) or average revenue of at least $6 million for the 
last three years. Rule 3a51-1(d) and (g), 17 CFR 240.3a51-1(d) and 
(g).
    \28\ 15 U.S.C. 77r.
    \29\ Proposed Rule 5250(e)(7). The Exchange has proposed to add 
these requirements in response to comments submitted on the original 
proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The BX Venture Market corporate governance requirements are 
generally comparable to those of the other exchanges. The Exchange 
would require that a listed company have an audit committee comprised 
of at least three independent directors that also meet the requirements 
of SEC Rule 10A-3.\30\ For a director to be considered an independent 
director, the company's board would have to determine that the 
individual does not have a relationship which, in the board's opinion, 
would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying 
out the responsibilities of a director.\31\ The board would be 
precluded from finding a director independent based on certain 
relationships, including if that director is currently an employee of 
the company or was employed by the company during the prior three years 
(including as an executive officer), accepted certain compensation or 
payments from the company during the prior three years, or had a family 
member with certain affiliations with the company.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ 17 CFR 240.10A-3. See proposed Rule 5605(c)(2). Companies 
may be eligible for a phase-in or cure period with respect to 
certain of these requirements.
    \31\ Proposed Rule 5605(a)(2) and IM-5605-1. The proposed 
definition of an independent director is identical to Nasdaq's 
definition of an independent director.
    \32\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The audit committee would be required to have a charter setting out 
its responsibilities, including the committee's purpose of overseeing 
the accounting and financial reporting processes of the company and the 
audits of the company's financial statements and the responsibilities 
and authority necessary to comply with SEC Rule 10A-3.\33\ The audit 
committee, or another independent body of the board, will also be 
required to conduct an appropriate review and oversight of any related 
party transaction.\34\ The Exchange believes that this requirement will 
limit the potential for self-dealing in connection with any related 
party transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ Proposed Rule 5605(c)(1).
    \34\ Proposed Rule 5630.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange would also require that independent directors make 
compensation decisions concerning the chief executive officer and other 
executive officers.\35\ Independent directors would be required to meet 
on a regular basis in executive sessions.\36\ These requirements for 
audit committees, compensation decisions, and executive sessions are 
identical to those of Nasdaq and substantially similar to those of the 
other national securities exchanges and the Exchange believes they will 
serve to empower the independent directors of its listed companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ Proposed Rule 5605(d) and IM-5605-6. A company can satisfy 
this requirement by having their independent directors make these 
decisions in executive session, or by having independent directors 
sit on a compensation committee. If the company chooses to use a 
compensation committee and the committee is comprised of at least 
three members, one director who is not independent as defined in 
Rule 5605(a)(2) and is not a current officer or employee or a Family 
Member of an officer or employee, may be appointed to the 
compensation committee under exceptional and limited circumstances, 
provided the company makes appropriate disclosure. Of course the 
Exchange will adopt rules required by Section 952 of the Dodd-Frank 
Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act following the 
necessary SEC rulemaking related to that provision.
    \36\ Proposed Rule 5605(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While the Exchange would require that a listed company have at 
least three independent directors to satisfy the audit committee 
requirement described above, it would not require that a majority of 
the company's board of directors be independent or an independent 
nomination committee because the Exchange believes those requirements 
could impose significant additional costs on these smaller companies 
and therefore discourage companies from pursuing an otherwise 
beneficial listing. In that regard, given the significant 
responsibilities imposed on audit and compensation committee

[[Page 82103]]

members, directors who serve on these committees are sometimes 
reluctant to serve on other committees. As such, if the BX Venture 
Market were to also require an independent nominations committee, 
companies may have to increase the size of their boards and add 
additional independent directors. Similarly, requiring that independent 
directors comprise a majority of a company's board could also require 
companies to add additional independent directors. In each case, the 
need to add independent directors would impose additional costs on the 
company.\37\ Moreover, nothing in the Commission's rules or the Act 
mandate these requirements.\38\ However, the Exchange believes that the 
requirement for executive sessions of the independent directors will 
provide a forum for the independent directors to consider whether the 
governance structure of the company is appropriate and raise any 
concerns, notwithstanding the lack of a majority independence and 
nominations committee requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\ The 2008-2009 Director Compensation Report prepared by the 
National Association of Corporate Directors (available from http://www.nacdonline.org/) found that the median total direct compensation 
per director was $78,060 for smaller companies (defined as companies 
with annual revenues of $50 to $500 million).
    \38\ See, e.g., Item 407(a) of Regulation S-K, which requires 
disclosure of non-independent directors who serve on nomination 
committees, implicitly allowing such service.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Companies listing on the BX Venture Market will be permitted to 
phase in compliance with the audit committee and compensation committee 
requirements following their listing. With respect to the audit 
committee requirements, a company listing in connection with its 
initial public offering would be required to have one independent 
director on the committee at the time of listing; a majority of 
independent members within 90 days of the date of effectiveness of the 
company's registration statement; and all independent members within 
one year of the date of effectiveness of the company's registration 
statement. For this purposes, a company will be considered to be 
listing in conjunction with an initial public offering only if it meets 
the conditions in SEC Rule 10A-3(b)(1)(iv)(A), namely that the company 
was not, immediately prior to the effective date of its registration 
statement, required to file reports with the Commission pursuant to 
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Act.
    With respect to the compensation committee requirement, a company 
listing in connection with its initial public offering, upon emerging 
from bankruptcy, or that otherwise was not subject to a substantially 
similar requirement prior to listing (such as a company only traded in 
the over-the-counter market) would be required to have one independent 
director on the committee at the time of listing; a majority of 
independent members within 90 days of listing; and all independent 
members within one year of listing. For this purposes, a company will 
be considered to be listing in conjunction with an initial public 
offering if immediately prior to listing it does not have a class of 
common stock registered under the Act.
    A company that transfers to the BX Venture Market from another 
national securities exchange with a substantially similar requirement 
will be immediately subject to the audit and compensation committee 
requirements, provided that the company will be afforded the balance of 
any grace period afforded by the other market.
    The Exchange will require companies to adopt a code of conduct 
applicable to all directors, officers and employees.\39\ Any waivers of 
the code for directors or executive officers must be approved by the 
board and disclosed. The Exchange believes that this requirement will 
help promote the ethical behavior of individuals associated with 
companies listed on the BX Venture Market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \39\ Proposed Rule 5610.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange will require shareholder approval when a 
company adopts or materially amends a stock option or purchase plan or 
other equity compensation arrangement pursuant to which stock may be 
acquired by officers, directors, employees, or consultants.\40\ The 
Exchange would not require shareholder approval for other share 
issuances, however, given that the companies expected to list on the 
Exchange may have a greater need to issue shares more frequently or 
more quickly, due to their expected smaller size and the business 
challenges they may be facing. As such, the Exchange believes that the 
cost and delay associated with seeking approval for share issuances 
would discourage companies from pursuing an otherwise beneficial 
listing.\41\ Nonetheless, the Exchange will require listed Companies to 
provide notice of any 5% change in its shares outstanding \42\ and the 
Exchange Staff will review such issuances for public interest concerns, 
such as issuances significantly below the market price or for the 
benefit of related parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \40\ Proposed Rule 5635.
    \41\ In this regard, the proposed rules are comparable to the 
rules of the National Stock Exchange, which require shareholder 
approval for equity compensation issuances but not for other share 
issuances. See National Stock Exchange Rule 15.6.
    \42\ Proposed Rule 5250(e)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Review Process
    Companies denied initial or continued listing would be afforded a 
review process similar to that contained in the existing Rule 4800 
Series of the Exchange's rules, which was modeled on the process 
available to companies listed on Nasdaq.\43\ The Exchange's Listing 
Qualifications staff only will be able to allow time-limited exceptions 
for certain deficiencies from the continued listing standards, such as 
the failure to file periodic reports, certain of the corporate 
governance requirements and any quantitative deficiency which does not 
contain a compliance period.\44\ Other of the continued listing 
requirements would provide for automatic compliance periods, including 
the market maker, market value of publicly held shares and audit 
committee requirements.\45\ If the company fails to timely solicit 
proxies or hold its annual meeting or fails to meet the minimum price 
requirement, or if staff has public interest concerns in connection 
with the company, Listing Qualifications staff will issue an immediate 
delisting letter to the company.\46\ Any other deficiency would result 
in the Listing Qualifications staff issuing a Public Reprimand Letter 
or a delisting notification.\47\ Hearings Panels composed of 
individuals not affiliated with the Exchange would be permitted to 
grant additional time to companies that received a delisting 
notification, or that were denied initial listing. A company could 
appeal a decision of the Hearings Panel to the Listing and Hearing 
Review Council, which is a committee appointed by the Exchange's Board 
to act for the Board with respect to listing decisions.\48\ The Listing 
and Hearing Review Council decision would be final, unless it is called 
for a discretionary review by the Exchange Board. The compliance 
periods and discretion to allow a non-compliant company to remain 
listed are generally shorter on the BX Venture Exchange than would be 
allowed an equivalent company listed on Nasdaq. For example, a Hearings 
Panel would only be permitted to grant 90 calendar days for a company 
to regain compliance with a listing standard, instead of the

[[Page 82104]]

180 calendar days available on Nasdaq. Similarly, a company that falls 
below the market value of listed securities requirement would be 
provided a 90 calendar day compliance period, instead of the 180 days 
available to a Nasdaq company.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \43\ Nasdaq Listing Rules 5800-5899.
    \44\ Proposed Rule 5810(c)(2).
    \45\ Proposed Rule 5810(c)(3).
    \46\ Proposed Rule 5810(c)(1).
    \47\ Proposed Rule 5810(c).
    \48\ Section 6.1 of the By-Laws on NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Oversight
    FINRA will regulate market activity on the BX Venture Market, as it 
does today for Nasdaq. Based on its breadth of experience overseeing 
the over-the-counter markets, FINRA will also enhance its review 
process by calibrating its surveillance patterns to detect potential 
issues that may arise particularly in low priced stocks. FINRA's review 
will include trading which takes place on the over-the-counter market 
in securities listed on the BX Venture Market. In addition, SMARTS 
Group, which is a world-leading technology provider of market 
surveillance solutions to exchanges and regulators around the 
world,\49\ will create a new suite of quoting and trading patterns to 
detect suspicious activity in low priced and less widely traded 
securities. Further, FINRA will review the activity of member firms 
quoting on the BX Venture Market when conducting their reviews of these 
firms. This review will include ``focused exams'' concentrated on sales 
practices and firm oversight.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \49\ SMARTS Group is a subsidiary of NASDAQ OMX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange will provide a monthly report to the SEC staff 
describing any significant developments on the BX Venture Exchange, 
including companies added or removed from the market during that 
period. In addition, the Exchange's Chief Regulatory Officer will 
provide quarterly reports describing the listing and surveillance 
activities of the Exchange during the prior quarter. The Exchange will 
also provide copies of the Listing Department's procedures manuals to 
the Commission's Office of Compliance, Inspections and Examinations.
Fees
    Companies would be required to submit an application review fee of 
$7,500 with their application for listing on the BX Venture Market, and 
would be required to pay a $15,000 annual fee for the first class 
listed on the Exchange and $5,000 for each additional class. The annual 
fee would be pro-rated for a company's first year of their listing. The 
application review fee will allow the Exchange to recover some of the 
costs associated with the initial review of the company's application, 
including staff time and the systems supporting the initial review 
process. The annual fee would similarly offset the staff and system 
costs of continued monitoring of the company. The proposed application 
and annual fees are substantially less than those charged by other 
national securities exchanges.\50\ Companies that were previously 
listed on Nasdaq would receive a credit, which can only be used to 
offset the annual fee, for any annual fees paid to Nasdaq during the 
same calendar year that they initially list on the BX Venture Market, 
for the months following their delisting from Nasdaq. The Exchange 
believes this credit is a reasonable allocation of fees under the Act 
because the Exchange and Nasdaq have the same ultimate parent, The 
NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc., and the company will have paid Nasdaq a non-
refundable fee to provide similar services as those that will be 
provided by the Exchange under its annual fee. As such, the Exchange 
believes it would be inequitable to charge the company a second fee in 
the same year to support the provision of those services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \50\ For example, the initial listing fees for listing common 
stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market range from $50,000 to $75,000 and 
the annual fees are $27,500; the initial listing fees for listing 
common stock on NYSE Amex range from $50,000 to $70,000 and the 
annual fees range from $27,500 to $40,000; the initial listing fees 
for listing common stock on the New York Stock Exchange range from 
$150,000 to $250,000 and the annual fees range from $38,000 to 
$500,000. See Nasdaq Rule 5920(a)(1) and (c)(1)(A), NYSE Amex Listed 
Company Guide Sections 140 and 141, and NYSE Listed Company Manual 
902.03.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Fees would also be assessed for certain one-time events, such as a 
$7,500 fee for substitution listing events, a $2,500 fee for record-
keeping changes, and a $4,000 or $5,000 fee for a written or oral 
hearing, respectively. These fees are identical to those charged on 
Nasdaq.
    Under Proposed Rule 5602, a company considering a specific action 
or transaction can request an interpretation from the Exchange, and in 
return, the Exchange will prepare a responsive letter as to how the 
rules apply to the proposed action or transaction. No company is 
required to request an interpretation, and staff will orally discuss 
the application of the Exchange's rules with companies without any 
additional charge. However, if the company seeks a written response, 
the Exchange proposes to charge a $15,000 fee to recoup the cost of 
staff's time in reviewing and responding to the request.\51\ The 
Exchange believes that the fee is appropriate, as the written response 
is applicable only to the company that requests it. The Exchange also 
believes that the written interpretive process, and the associated fee, 
will provide an additional public benefit in that staff will prepare 
anonymous summaries of interpretations, as well as frequently asked 
questions based on requests received from companies, including those 
withdrawn before a written response is issued. These summaries and 
questions will be posted on the Exchange's Web site so that the general 
public, practitioners, and other companies can better understand how 
the Exchange applies its rules and policies. In this way, the overall 
need to request such interpretations is minimized, thus reducing 
burdens on companies and staff alike.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \51\ No fee would be charged in connection with requests 
involving a company's initial listing application given that the 
company will pay an application fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Other Changes
    As part of the proposed rule change, the Exchange is deleting 
portions of the Rule 4000 Series related to the listing and trading of 
securities eligible to be listed on the BX Venture Market and 
correcting cross-references to those deleted sections. The Exchange is 
maintaining those provisions of the Rule 4000 applicable to securities 
that will not be eligible to be listed on the BX Venture Market, such 
as Portfolio Depository Receipts, Index Fund Shares, Trust Issued 
Receipts, Securities Linked to the Performance of Indexes and 
Commodities, and Managed Fund Shares, to enable the continued trading 
of such securities on the Exchange pursuant to unlisted trading 
privileges.
    The Exchange is deleting Rule 4430, which provided listing criteria 
for limited partnership rollup transactions using language that was 
substantially similar to language contained in FINRA Rule 2310. 
Instead, the Exchange addresses these issues in proposed Rule 5210(h). 
This rule adopts the same approach taken by Nasdaq and NYSE AMEX by 
incorporating the FINRA rule by reference.\52\ In this manner, the 
Exchange satisfies the requirement of Section 6(b)(9) of the Exchange 
Act,\53\ which requires that the rules of a national securities 
exchange prohibit certain limited partnership rollup transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \52\ Nasdaq Rule 5210(h) and NYSE Amex Listed Company Guide 
Section 126.
    \53\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(9).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is also moving the additional requirements applicable 
to the listing of securities issued by NASDAQ OMX or its affiliates 
from Rule 4370 to Rule 5701.

[[Page 82105]]

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\54\ in general and with 
Sections 6(b)(5) of the Act,\55\ in particular in that it is designed 
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote 
just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and 
coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, 
processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions 
in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a 
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to 
protect investors and the public interest. The proposed new listing 
venue will advance these goals by allowing qualified issuers to list on 
a transparent, well-regulated marketplace with increased transparency 
about the trading of these securities, thereby protecting investors and 
the public interest and helping to prevent fraudulent and manipulative 
acts and practices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \54\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \55\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange believes that the proposed market is 
consistent with Section 17B of the Act, which codifies Congress' 
findings that it is in the public interest and appropriate for the 
protection of investors and the maintenance of fair and orderly markets 
to improve significantly the information available to brokers, dealers, 
investors, and regulators with respect to quotations for and 
transactions in penny stocks and that a fully implemented automated 
quotation system for penny stocks would meet the information needs of 
investors and market participants and would add visibility and 
regulatory and surveillance data to that market. Section 17B further 
instructs the Commission to facilitate the widespread dissemination of 
reliable and accurate last sale and quotation information with respect 
to penny stocks, as the Exchange will for securities listed on the BX 
Venture Market, through one or more automated quotation systems 
operated by a registered securities association or a national 
securities exchange, providing reliable pricing information and 
reporting of transactions.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Procedure: Request for Written Comments

    In the Order Instituting Proceedings, the Commission requested that 
interested persons provide written submissions of their views, data and 
arguments with respect to the issues identified above, as well as any 
others they may have identified with the proposal. In particular, the 
Commission invited the written views of interested persons concerning 
whether the proposed rule change is inconsistent with Section 6(b)(5) 
or any other provision of the Act, or the rules and regulations 
thereunder. The Commission also stated that, although there do not 
appear to be any issues relevant to approval or disapproval which would 
be facilitated by an oral presentation of views, data, and arguments, 
the Commission will consider, pursuant to Rule 19b-4, any request for 
an opportunity to make an oral presentation.\56\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \56\ Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, as amended by the Securities 
Acts Amendments of 1975, Public Law 94-29, 89 Stat. 97 (1975), 
grants the Commission flexibility to determine what type of 
proceeding--either oral or notice and opportunity for written 
comments--is appropriate for consideration of a particular proposal 
by a self-regulatory organization. See Securities Acts Amendments of 
1975, Report of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban 
Affairs to Accompany S. 249, S. Rep. No. 75, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. 
30 (1975).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As noted in the Order Instituting Proceedings, interested persons 
are invited to submit written data, views and arguments regarding 
whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved by January 24, 
2011.\57\ Any person who wishes to file a rebuttal to any other 
person's submission must file that rebuttal by February 8, 2011.\58\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \57\ See Order Instituting Proceedings, supra note 4.
    \58\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the Order Instituting Proceedings, the Commission asked that 
commenters address the merit of BX's statements in support of the 
proposal, in addition to any other comments they may wish to submit 
about the proposed rule change.\59\ The Commission also specifically 
asked for comment on the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \59\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Do commenters agree with BX's belief that the proposed BX 
listing market will provide a transparent, well-regulated marketplace 
for companies with smaller market capitalization contemplating an 
initial exchange listing and companies delisted from another national 
securities exchange for failure to meet quantitative listing standards? 
Why or why not?
     Is the proposed vetting and due diligence process of 
prospective issuers on the BX listing market sufficient to prevent 
companies that might erode investor confidence (due to potential fraud) 
in the market from listing? Why or why not?
     Given that BX-listed companies are likely to be smaller 
than listed companies on other exchanges, should BX undertake any 
additional measures (including additional surveillances) to reduce the 
risk of fraudulent and manipulative behavior with respect to the 
listing and/or trading of BX-listed securities? Why or why not?
     Do commenters believe there is any likelihood of investor 
confusion regarding the BX listing market? Would investors be inclined 
to believe that a BX-listed company is listed on Nasdaq? Are the 
Exchange's proposed actions to reduce or avoid investor confusion 
sufficient? Why or why not? If not, what additional measures should the 
Exchange undertake?
     Do the proposed initial and continued listing standards 
for the BX listing market assure sufficient liquidity in listed 
securities? Why or why not? Are there other listing criteria that 
commenters would suggest to better assure sufficient liquidity in 
listed securities?
     Are the proposed initial and continued listing standards 
for the BX listing market sufficiently designed to reduce the risk that 
an individual or small group of shareholders will be in a position to 
manipulate the listed security? Why or why not?
     Are the proposed initial and continued listing standards 
and the delisting process for the BX listing market sufficiently 
designed to prevent stocks that are of a type that historically have 
been prone to fraudulent schemes from being listed? Why or why not?
     Do commenters believe that the proposed delisting and 
appeals procedures and timeframes are sufficient and appropriate? Are 
the timeframes too long or too short? Why or why not?
     Are the proposed corporate governance standards for the BX 
listing market sufficiently designed to assure an appropriate level of 
corporate governance? Why or why not?
     Do commenters agree with the Exchange's belief that a BX 
listing could help companies raise capital and thus promote job 
creation within the United States? Why or why not?

[[Page 82106]]

     Has BX sufficiently addressed how quotations and 
transactions reports relating to BX-listed securities will be 
disseminated? Will this result in fragmentation of pricing information 
relating to these securities? Will this undermine the ability of 
investors to receive best execution? Why or why not?
    Comments may continue to be submitted by any of the following 
methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-BX-2010-059 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2010-059. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for 
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make publicly available. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2010-059 and should be 
submitted on or before January 24, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \60\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\60\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-32731 Filed 12-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P