Document ID: SEC-2012-0799-0001
Agency: sec
Document Type: Notice
Title: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes: NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
Posted Date: 2012-05-21T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 98 (Monday, May 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30038-30040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-12195]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-66992; File No. SR-Phlx-2012-62]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to PSX Rule 
3301(f)(8) Concerning the Processing of the Price To Comply Order

May 15, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on May 4, 2012, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') 
the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, 
which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is 
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change 
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to clarify how the processing of a Price to 
Comply Order under PSX Rule 3301(f)(8) operates based on the method of 
entry. The Exchange will implement the change effective May 14, 2012.
    The text of the proposed rule change is below. Proposed new 
language is in italics; proposed deletions are in brackets.
* * * * *

3301. Definitions

    The following definitions apply to the Rule 3200 and 3300 Series 
for the trading of securities on PSX.
    (a)-(e)
    (f) The term ``Order Type'' shall mean the unique processing 
prescribed for designated orders that are eligible for entry into the 
System, and shall include:
    (1)-(6) No change.
    (7) Reserved.
    (8) ``Price to Comply Order'' are orders that, if, at the time of 
entry, a Price to Comply Order would lock or cross the quotation of an 
external market, the order will be priced to the current low offer (for 
bids) or to the current best bid (for offers) and displayed at a price 
one minimum price increment lower than the offer (for bids) or higher 
than the bid (for offers). The displayed and undisplayed prices of a 
Price to Comply order entered through an OUCH port may be adjusted once 
or multiple times depending upon [the method of order entry and] the 
election of the member firm and changes to the prevailing NBBO. The 
displayed and undisplayed prices of a Price to Comply order entered 
through a RASH port may be adjusted multiple times, depending upon 
changes to the prevailing NBBO.
    (9)-(11) No change.
    (g)-(i) No change.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Phlx is proposing to clarify the effect that the methods of order 
entry have on the processing of Price to Comply Orders, as described in 
PSX Rule 3301(f)(8).\3\ Price to Comply Orders allow members to quote 
aggressively and still comply with the locked and crossed markets 
provisions of Regulation NMS.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ ``Price to Comply Order'' is an order such that, if, at the 
time of entry, it would lock or cross the quotation of an external 
market, the order will be priced to the current low offer (for bids) 
or to the current best bid (for offers) and displayed at a price one 
minimum price increment lower than the offer (for bids) or higher 
than the bid (for offers).
    \4\ 17 CFR 242.610.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As part of the launch of its PSX equities market in October 2010, 
Phlx adopted many substantially similar equities rules to that of its 
sister exchange The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ''), including the 
Price to Comply Order type under PSX Rule 3301(f)(8).\5\ NASDAQ amended 
its definition of the Price to Comply Order type under NASDAQ Rule 
4751(f)(7) in June 2008.\6\ Prior to June 2008, if at the time of entry 
on NASDAQ a Price to

[[Page 30039]]

Comply Order would create a violation of SEC Rule 610(d) by locking or 
crossing the protected quote of an external market or would cause a 
violation of SEC Rule 611 by trading through such a protected quote, 
the order was converted by the NASDAQ system to a Non-Displayed Order, 
as defined in NASDAQ Rule 4751(e)(3),\7\ and re-priced to the current 
low offer (for bids) or to the current best bid (for offers). 
Thereafter, such Non-Displayed Orders were cancelled by the NASDAQ 
system if the market moved through the price of the order after the 
order was accepted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62877 (September 9, 
2010), 75 FR 56633 (September 16, 2010) (SR-Phlx-2010-79).
    \6\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57910 (June 3, 2008), 73 
FR 32776 (June 10, 2008) (SR-NASDAQ-2008-049).
    \7\ ``Non-Displayed Order'' is a limit order that is not 
displayed in the NASDAQ system, but nevertheless remains available 
for potential execution against all incoming orders until executed 
in full or cancelled. Phlx's definition of Non-Displayed Order under 
Rule 3301(e)(2) mirrors in substance that of NASDAQ's definition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The June 2008 amendment changed how the NASDAQ Price to Comply 
Order operates so that a locking or crossing order is no longer 
converted to a Non-Displayed Order, but rather is displayed at the most 
aggressive price possible, one minimum price increment worse than the 
locking price. NASDAQ also added language to the rule, subsequently 
mirrored in PSX Rule 3301(f)(8), which noted that NASDAQ may adjust the 
displayed and undisplayed prices of a Price to Comply Order once or 
multiple times, depending on the method of order entry and changes to 
the National Best Bid and Offer (``NBBO''). In its discussion of the 
rule change, NASDAQ explained that the displayed and undisplayed price 
of an individual order may be modified one or more times depending upon 
the manner of order entry into the system. In particular, if a member 
chooses to enter a Price to Comply Order via NASDAQ's RASH protocol, 
the order is priced upon entry and may be adjusted multiple times in 
response to changes in the prevailing NBBO to move the displayed price 
closer to the original entered price and display the best possible 
price consistent with the provisions of Regulation NMS. In addition, 
each time the displayed price is adjusted, the order will receive a new 
timestamp for purposes of determining its price/time priority according 
to NASDAQ's existing processing rules. If a Price to Comply Order is 
entered via NASDAQ's OUCH protocol, however, the order will be repriced 
only upon entry and the order is not repriced in the event the 
prevailing NBBO changes. The PSX Price to Comply Order operates in the 
same manner as the NASDAQ Price to Comply Order.
    Phlx is proposing to amend PSX Rule 3301(f)(8) to clarify the 
effect that the method of order entry has on the processing of the 
Price to Comply Order. As noted above, the method of entry of a Price 
to Comply Order determines whether the order is repriced once or 
multiple times. This will continue to be the case under the amended 
rule; however, an OUCH subscriber will be afforded the choice to have 
its Price to Comply Order be subject to repricing either only once or 
multiple times. Member firms will designate each OUCH protocol order 
port to use either the single or multiple repricing functionality for 
Price to Comply Orders entered via that port.\8\ A RASH subscriber will 
continue to have all Price to Comply Orders repriced multiple times, 
when appropriate. The methodology for repricing Price to Comply Orders 
will not vary based on how the order is entered. Like RASH-entered 
Price to Comply Orders, each time the OUCH-entered order is repriced it 
will receive a new timestamp for purposes of determining its price/time 
priority. As such, a repriced Price to Comply order is treated as a new 
order in terms of priority and, as such, there is no guarantee that the 
OUCH-entered Price to Comply Order will receive priority when it 
becomes actionable after repricing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ In the absence of designation from a member firm, Phlx will 
default the member's OUCH port(s) to single repricing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Phlx believes that the new functionality and related rule change 
will serve to reduce the order traffic received using the OUCH 
protocol. Phlx notes that, in certain cases, a member will submit a 
Price to Comply Order at an aggressive price that it anticipates will 
be at the NBBO. Often such an order is not submitted at the NBBO and is 
not executed after repricing because the market does not move to the 
adjusted order price. In these cases, the member firm will typically 
submit additional aggressive orders, which likewise are not executed. 
Because the OUCH protocol is used by member firms that are able to 
submit a large volume of orders, Phlx believes that offering such firms 
the ability to have Phlx reprice their Price to Comply Orders multiple 
times will serve to reduce the excessive volume of orders entered into 
the system which are ultimately canceled.
    As noted, Phlx will continue to offer OUCH subscribers an 
alternative to the multiple repricing functionality so that such member 
firms may elect to have their locked or crossed Price to Comply Orders 
repriced only once, consistent with the current process. Phlx believes 
that this will accommodate member firms that seek the certainty of 
repricing at most once or whose trading systems depend on the existing 
repricing mechanism.
    Phlx is also making a technical change to PSX Rule 3301(f) to add 
an omitted subsection (7) to the numbering under the rule, noting that 
it is reserved for future use.
2. Statutory Basis
    Phlx believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the 
provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\9\ in general, and with Section 
6(b)(5) of the Act \10\ in particular, in that the proposal is designed 
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote 
just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and 
coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, 
processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions 
in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a 
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to 
protect investors and the public interest. Phlx believes this proposal 
is consistent with the Exchange Act and, specifically, Rules 610 and 
611of Regulation NMS in that it is designed to prevent orders from 
locking and crossing market or trading through protected quotes, while 
also promoting a more efficient market. In this regard, Phlx believes 
that the proposed rule change will promote the efficient use of the 
Exchange by reducing the number of orders entered into the market and 
ultimately canceled. As noted, OUCH users tend to enter a relatively 
large number of aggressive orders that are ultimately canceled after 
repricing. The proposed rule change will reduce the excessive order 
traffic experienced by the Exchange due to these cancelled orders and 
promote the more efficient use of the market by providing OUCH 
subscribers, who tend to enter the greatest number of such cancelled 
orders, an option to have the Exchange reprice a single order multiple 
times. Phlx also believes that permitting a high volume user the option 
to continue to have the Exchange reprice its Price to Comply Order only 
upon order entry, when appropriate, will ensure member firms with 
internal systems that act in reliance of this function will continue to 
operate without disruption.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 30040]]

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) 
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public 
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) 
become operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or such 
shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective 
pursuant to 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \12\ 
thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6) 
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission 
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at 
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed 
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. 
The Commission notes that the Exchange has satisfied this 
requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File No. SR-Phlx-2012-62 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-Phlx-2012-62. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File No. SR-Phlx-2012-62 and should be 
submitted on or before June 11, 2012.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-12195 Filed 5-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P