Document ID: EPA-R03-OAR-2019-0663-0010
Agency: epa
Document Type: Rule
Title: Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Approvals and Promulgations: Delaware; Infrastructure Requirements for the 2015 Ozone Standard and Revisions to Modeling Requirements
Posted Date: 2020-05-01T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 85 (Friday, May 1, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 25307-25311]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-08241]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2019-0663; FRL-10007-98-Region 3]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Delaware; Infrastructure Requirements for the 2015 Ozone Standard and 
Revisions to Modeling Requirements

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving two 
state implementation plan (SIP) submissions submitted by the State of 
Delaware. The first submission addresses the basic program elements, 
including, but not limited to, regulatory structure, monitoring, 
modeling, legal authority, and adequate resources necessary to assure 
attainment and maintenance of the National Ambient Air Quality 
Standards (NAAQS). This type of SIP submission is referred to as an 
infrastructure SIP submission. Delaware made this submission in order 
to address the infrastructure requirements for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. 
EPA is approving Delaware's infrastructure SIP submission in accordance 
with the requirements of Clean Air Act (CAA) section 110(a). EPA is 
also approving a second submission from Delaware which updates a 
reference to the current version of EPA's modeling guidance.

DATES: This final rule is effective on June 1, 2020.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID 
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2019-0663. All documents in the docket are listed on 
the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, 
some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business 
information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted 
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is 
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard 
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through 
https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability 
information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Schulingkamp, Planning & 
Implementation Branch (3AD30), Air & Radiation Division, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. The telephone number is (215) 814-
2021. Mr. Schulingkamp can also be reached via electronic mail at 
schulingkamp.joseph@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    On February 10, 2020 (85 FR 7494), EPA published a notice of 
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for the State of Delaware. In the NPRM, EPA 
proposed approval of two SIP submissions submitted on behalf of the 
State of Delaware by the Delaware Department of Natural Resources 
(DNREC).
    DRNEC submitted the first SIP submission on October 11, 2018 to 
address the infrastructure SIP requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2) 
for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. This submission addressed the following 
elements of CAA section 110(a)(2): (A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(I), 
(D)(i)(II), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). On November 4, 
2019, DNREC submitted a letter identifying outdated references in its 
October 11, 2018 submission and committing to submit a future SIP 
revision in order to address the deficiency. With this letter, Delaware 
requested that EPA conditionally approve the State's submission with 
respect to CAA section 110(a)(2)(K), based on the commitment to submit 
a future SIP revision to update a State regulation to reflect current 
requirements with respect to modeling.
    On December 16, 2019, however, DNREC submitted a second SIP 
submission to amend Title 7 of the Delaware Administrative Code (DE 
Admin. Code), Regulation 1125, Requirements for Preconstruction Review 
in the current EPA-approved SIP for Delaware. The State intended this 
submission to meet the commitment described in the State's November 4, 
2019 letter as previously described. This second submission revises a 
section of Regulation 1125 to incorporate by reference the most recent 
revision to

[[Page 25308]]

EPA's Guideline on Air Quality Models into State regulation. 
Specifically, the revision changes Delaware's regulation that 
references the ``Guideline on Air Quality Models'' as published by 
EPA's Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards in July 1986 and 
supplemented in July 1987 to the ``Guideline on Air Quality Models (40 
CFR part 51, Appendix W, July 1, 2019 ed.).'' Because Delaware has 
submitted the intended SIP revision outlined in the State's November 4, 
2019 letter, EPA considered CAA section 110(a)(2)(K) of Delaware's 
October 11, 2018 SIP submission for full approval instead of the 
November 4, 2019 request for conditional approval.

II. EPA Analysis

    EPA has analyzed Delaware's October 11, 2018 infrastructure SIP 
submission for the 2015 ozone NAAQS and has determined that it meets 
the applicable requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2). EPA also reviewed 
Delaware's revisions to 7 DE Admin. Code 1125 and concludes that the 
revised references to 40 CFR part 51, Appendix W, as published in the 
July 2019 edition of the CFR, are the correct modeling guidelines to 
use for implementation of CAA programs. A detailed summary of EPA's 
review and rationale for approving Delaware's submissions may be found 
in the technical support document (TSD) for the proposed rulemaking 
action which is available online at www.regulations.gov, docket number 
EPA-R03-OAR-2019-0663. Other specific requirements and background 
information, as well as the rationale for EPA's proposed action, are 
explained in the NPRM and will not be restated here.

III. Response to Comments

    EPA received four sets of comments in response to the NPRM that are 
available in the docket for this action. Summaries of the significant 
adverse comments and EPA's responses are provided below.
    Comment 1: The first commenter stated that EPA should disapprove 
Delaware's infrastructure SIP submission because, ``it is substantially 
higher than the 2012 federal levels EPA established for that smog-
forming pollutant.'' The commenter continued by mentioning a ``1,000-
pound-per-square-mile rule'' which, the commenter stated, Delaware and 
New Jersey have already implemented while other states have not but are 
now in the process of complying.
    Response 1: EPA disagrees with the comment. The commenter did not 
provide any additional information beyond general assertions; the 
commenter did not identify any specific infrastructure element. The 
commenter suggests Delaware has substantially higher smog-forming 
pollutants than ``2012 federal levels,'' but EPA notes that the Agency 
did not set any ``federal levels'' in the 2012 calendar year for any 
smog-forming pollutants such as oxides of nitrogen (NOX) or 
volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Furthermore, EPA notes the purpose 
of an infrastructure SIP is to ensure the state has addressed the basic 
program elements, including, but not limited to, regulatory structure, 
monitoring, modeling, legal authority, and adequate resources necessary 
to assure attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS; an infrastructure 
SIP submission is not required to address the nonattainment plan SIP 
submission requirements of section 110(a)(2)(I) for attainment of the 
NAAQS in question.\1\ To the extent that Delaware has designated 
nonattainment areas for this NAAQS, the State will address and EPA will 
evaluate those requirements in a separate action. With respect to a 
``1,000-pound-per-square-mile rule,'' EPA is unaware of any such rule 
implemented by any of the states named by the commenter, nor was EPA 
able to identify the commenter's concerns with EPA's proposed approval 
of Delaware's infrastructure submission as it relates to any such rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan 
(SIP) Elements under Clear Air Act Section 110(a)(1) and 
110(a)(2),'' Memorandum from Stephen D. Page, September 13, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Comment 2: The second commenter suggested that EPA should 
disapprove Delaware's infrastructure SIP submission, ``because of its 
findings that either EPA hasn't considered this issue fully or that it 
is not sufficiently vigilant in its enforcement of its regulations.'' 
The commenter also stated that EPA should disapprove the infrastructure 
SIP submission out of concern that the State will not be able to 
sustain its planned measures to reduce ozone during the next two 
decades. The commenter also referenced four reasonably available 
control technology (RACT) programs in the states of Delaware, New 
Jersey, New York, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and suggested 
that EPA should disapprove Delaware's infrastructure SIP submission, 
``until all four states have RACT programs that are approved.''
    Response 2: EPA disagrees with the commenter's statement that, 
``EPA hasn't considered this issue fully or that it is not sufficiently 
vigilant in its enforcement of its regulations.'' In the TSD for this 
rulemaking action, EPA determined that the State of Delaware is 
currently operating a program to provide for the enforcement of 
emission limits and other control measures, means, or techniques as may 
be necessary or appropriate to meet the applicable requirements of the 
CAA. Delaware's SIP submission references several State laws and 
regulations which allow the State to exercise its programmatic 
authority to utilize enforcement powers, and to impose criminal, civil, 
and administrative penalties to sources in the State that violate 
applicable SIP emission limits or control measures.
    EPA further disagrees that the Agency should disapprove Delaware's 
submission based on the assertion that the State may not be able to 
sustain its ozone reductions for the next two decades. In terms of the 
SIP submissions before EPA in this rulemaking action, the commenter did 
not identify any specific infrastructure SIP deficiencies which would 
prevent the State from meeting its obligations. Although the commenter 
does not identify any specific CAA requirements, EPA believes the 
commenter is referring to the maintenance plan requirements under CAA 
section 175A which is analogous to the commenter's phrasing ``. . . to 
sustain ozone reductions for the next two decades.'' CAA section 175A 
requires any state requesting a redesignation of a nonattainment area 
to submit a revision to provide for the maintenance of the NAAQS for at 
least 10 years. A state is also required under CAA section 175A(b) to 
submit a second revision to provide for the maintenance of the NAAQS 
for an additional 10 years after the expiration of the first 10-year 
period; thus, ensuring maintenance of the NAAQS for a total of 20 
years. The latter maintenance plan requirements under section 175A are 
not applicable in the context of an infrastructure SIP submission.
    EPA also disagrees that it should disapprove Delaware's 
infrastructure submission because it has not yet approved RACT 
submissions for the 2015 ozone NAAQS for the States of Delaware, New 
Jersey, New York, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. These RACT 
requirements are not relevant to the applicable infrastructure SIP 
submission requirements of CAA section 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2), but 
rather to the requirements in CAA sections 110(a)(2)(I), 182 and 184. 
These sections establish requirements for nonattainment area SIP 
submission and the states included in the Ozone Transport Region (OTR).
    As explained in the response to Comment 1 of this preamble, the

[[Page 25309]]

purpose of an infrastructure SIP is not to meet nonattainment plan 
requirements for the NAAQS, but to ensure that a state's SIP includes 
basic program elements necessary to assure attainment, maintenance, and 
enforcement of the NAAQS. The requirements of CAA sections 
110(a)(2)(I), 175A, 182, and 184 all relate to states' attainment 
planning requirements if they have designated nonattainment areas for 
the NAAQS in question. SIP submissions to meet these requirements are 
due by different statutorily prescribed deadlines under subparts 2 
through 5 under part D. Because the CAA directs states to submit these 
nonattainment plan SIP submissions on a separate schedule, EPA does not 
interpret the CAA to require states to address these requirements in 
the infrastructure SIP submission due three years after promulgation or 
revision of a NAAQS.
    Comment 3: The third commenter questioned EPA's proposed approval 
of Delaware's infrastructure SIP submission with respect to section 
110(a)(2)(K) pertaining to modeling requirements, including the 
revision to Regulation 1125. The commenter asserted EPA has already 
approved an infrastructure SIP submission from the State of New Mexico 
in which that State had language similar to that of the State of 
Delaware, and thus suggested that EPA is being inconsistent in its 
approach to this infrastructure SIP element. The comment further 
asserted that EPA must explain why Delaware's pre-existing regulation 
was different from the New Mexico regulation, or else ``recall the 
approval of New Mexico's SIP action and force the state to fix the 
problem.'' The comment also suggested that EPA cannot require Delaware 
to revise its regulations with respect to modeling authority and 
requirements to meet CAA section 110(a)(2)(K) ``while allowing New 
Mexico to skirt federal regulations.''
    Response 3: EPA disagrees with the commenter. First, as EPA stated 
in the NPRM and the TSD for this rulemaking action, Delaware is 
correctly addressing the requirements of section 110(a)(2)(K) in this 
action. The State correctly addressed the deficiency initially 
identified by EPA and submitted a separate SIP revision to change the 
reference in Regulation 1125 to refer clearly to the Guideline on Air 
Quality Models in 40 CFR part 51, appendix W. Delaware initially 
identified an existing state regulation to meet the requirements of 
110(a)(2)(K) that explicitly referenced an outdated version of EPA's 
Guideline on Air Quality Models. Upon further investigation, EPA 
determined, and Delaware agreed, that the State regulation did not 
authorize the State to use the most recent version of EPA's Guideline 
on Air Quality Models. Delaware made the necessary changes to the State 
regulation. EPA proposed approval of Delaware's revision to Regulation 
1125 because the revision is consistent with CAA section 110(a)(2)(K) 
and allows the State to comply and use the correct modeling guidelines 
found in 40 CFR part 51, appendix W.
    Second, EPA disagrees with the commenter's assertion that the 
Agency is allowing states to ``skirt federal regulations'' or that the 
Agency must ``recall the approval of New Mexico's SIP action and force 
the state to fix the problem.'' EPA assumes the commenter is referring 
to the final rulemaking notice (FRN) published on September 18, 2019, 
relating to New Mexico's 2015 ozone NAAQS infrastructure SIP.\2\ In the 
New Mexico FRN, EPA responded to similar comments regarding the 
appropriateness of the Agency's proposed approval of CAA section 
110(a)(2)(K) and explained why the Agency believed the wording of the 
New Mexico regulation was sufficient in the response to comments 
section. In that action, upon evaluation of the authority provided by 
the regulation in question, EPA and the State agreed that New Mexico's 
regulations submitted to meet the relevant CAA requirements provide the 
State with the authority and the requirement to use the latest version 
of EPA's Guideline on Air Quality Models, also known as Appendix W, and 
is not restricting the State to use the version referenced in the 
State's regulation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See 84 FR 49057, September 18, 2019; ``Air Plan Approval; 
New Mexico; Infrastructure for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air 
Quality Standards and Repeal of State Regulations for Total 
Suspended Particulate''.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, EPA is not acting on any New Mexico SIP submission in this 
action, thus how New Mexico's SIP meets CAA section 110(a)(2)(K) is not 
relevant to the approval of Delaware's Regulation 1125 or the Delaware 
infrastructure SIP submission for the 2015 ozone NAAQS with respect to 
CAA section 110(a)(2)(K). Further, the New Mexico action's public 
comment period closed on May 20, 2019 and the FRN was published on 
September 18, 2019 (84 FR 49057, September 18, 2019); there is no basis 
to reopen that action at this time, nor does the commenter provide any 
such basis.
    Comment 4: The fourth commenter asked why EPA was approving 
Delaware's modeling regulation change. The commenter claimed Delaware's 
ozone air quality has remained substantially unchanged from 2005 
through 2012 even though ozone levels fell in other states. The comment 
referenced an ``Ozone Science Program's (OSP) review of the Virginia 
program and other states' EPA-issued Ground Level Ozone Standards 
(GLOS),'' but did not elaborate this review's conclusions. The comment 
claims that EPA approved Delaware's proposed rule change based on 
flawed science and because of political and regulatory considerations. 
The comment concludes by claiming, ``As a result of EPA's disregard for 
its own standards, Delaware's ozone standards remain virtually 
unchanged from 2012 until 2022.''
    Response 4: EPA disagrees with the comment. EPA proposed approval 
of Delaware's Regulation 1125 because the revision corrects a 
deficiency where the State regulation referenced a specific document 
authored and published by EPA in 1986 and supplemented in 1987. This 
document was replaced by 40 CFR part 51, appendix W and was most 
recently updated in the Federal Register on January 17, 2017 at, 82 FR 
5203. Based on this information, DNREC correctly revised Regulation 
1125 and submitted it to EPA for approval into the SIP, which EPA 
subsequently proposed approval in the NPRM. The commenter's assertions 
that the proposed approval of this regulation is ``based on flawed 
science and because of political and regulatory considerations'' is 
incorrect and the commenter did not provide any additional information 
to support these claims.
    As a factual matter, EPA also disagrees with the assertions that 
Delaware's air quality has remained unchanged for 10 years. Since 2007, 
design values \3\ in Delaware have consistently trended downward and 
the most recent data shows only three out of the seven State monitors 
are showing violations of the 2015 ozone NAAQS based on 2018 design 
values.\4\ EPA reiterates that the purpose of an infrastructure SIP is 
not to demonstrate attainment of the NAAQS, but to ensure that a 
state's SIP has addressed basic program elements necessary to assure 
attainment, maintenance, and enforcement of the NAAQS. Therefore, the 
status of Delaware's air quality is not relevant to whether EPA should 
approve

[[Page 25310]]

the revisions to Regulation 1125 or the State's infrastructure SIP 
submission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ A ``design value'' is a statistical metric that describes 
the air quality status of a given location relative to the level of 
the NAAQS.
    \4\ See https://www.epa.gov/air-trends/air-quality-design-values#report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Final Action

    EPA is approving Delaware's October 11, 2018 infrastructure SIP 
submission for the 2015 ozone NAAQS because it provides the basic 
program elements specified in CAA section 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), 
(E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M) necessary to implement, 
maintain, and enforce the 2015 ozone NAAQS. This rulemaking action does 
not include action on CAA section 110(a)(2)(I) which pertains to the 
nonattainment planning requirements of part D, title I of the CAA, 
because this element is not required to be submitted by the 3-year 
submission deadline of section 110(a)(1) of the CAA and will be 
addressed in a separate process. EPA is also approving Delaware's 
December 16, 2019 SIP submission which updates 7 DE Admin. Code 1125 in 
order to incorporate by reference the correct modeling guidelines 
contained in 40 CFR part 51, appendix W. EPA's approval of the 
infrastructure SIP submission with respect to section 110(a)(2)(K) is 
based on this revision to Delaware's SIP.

V. Incorporation by Reference

    In this document, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes 
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of section 3.10 
of 7 DE Admin. Code, Regulation 1125, effective January 11, 2020. EPA 
has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally 
available through https://www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region III 
Office (please contact the person identified in the For Further 
Information Contact section of this preamble for more information). 
Therefore, these materials have been approved by EPA for inclusion in 
the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by EPA into that plan, are 
fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of 
the effective date of the final rulemaking of EPA's approval, and will 
be incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP 
compilation.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. General Requirements

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state 
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 
2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under 
Executive Order 12866.
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as 
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), 
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in 
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct 
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by June 30, 2020. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor 
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may 
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or 
action. This action, pertaining to Delaware's section 110(a)(2) 
infrastructure requirements for the 2015 ozone NAAQS and revisions to 
Regulation 1125, may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce 
its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: April 13, 2020.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart I--Delaware

0
2. Amend Sec.  52.420:
0
a. In the table in paragraph (c), under ``1125 Requirements for 
Preconstruction

[[Page 25311]]

Review'' by revising the entry for ``Section 3.0''; and
0
b. In the table in paragraph (e) by adding the entry ``Section 
110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS'' at the 
end of the table.
    The revision and addition read as follows:

Sec.  52.420  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                            Epa-Approved Regulations and Statutes in the Delaware Sip
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             State
 State regulation (7 DNREC 1100)      Title/subject        effective     EPA approval date        Additional
                                                             date                                explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  1125 Requirements for Preconstruction Review
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 3.0......................  Prevention of               1/11/20  5/1/2020, [insert    Docket #: 2019-
                                    Significant                          Federal Register     0663. Revised
                                    Deterioration of                     citation].           3.10.1 and 3.10.2.
                                    Air Quality.                                              Note: Previous
                                                                                              Section 3.0
                                                                                              approval October
                                                                                              2, 2012.
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Name of non-regulatory SIP        Applicable           State
            revision               geographic area   submittal date   EPA approval date   Additional explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 110(a)(2)                Statewide.........        10/11/18  5/1/2020, [insert   Docket #: 2019-0663.
 Infrastructure Requirements                                          Federal Register    This action addresses
 for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS.                                            citation].          CAA section
                                                                                          110(a)(2)(A), (B),
                                                                                          (C), (D), (E), (F),
                                                                                          (G), (H), (J), (K),
                                                                                          (L), and (M).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2020-08241 Filed 4-30-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P