Document ID: FAA-2009-0685-0004
Agency: faa
Document Type: Rule
Title: Airworthiness Directives: McDonnell Douglas Corporation Model DC-9-30, DC-9-40, and DC-9-50 Series Airplanes
Posted Date: 2010-05-17T04:00Z

[Federal Register: May 17, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 94)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 27401-27403]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17my10-2]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0685; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-113-AD;
Amendment 39-16299; AD 2010-10-20]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Corporation Model DC-
9-30, DC-9-40, and DC-9-50 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Model DC-9-30, DC-9-40, and DC-9-50 series airplanes. This AD requires
inspecting to determine the part numbers of the forward and aft
auxiliary tank fuel boost and transfer pump conduit/conduit assembly
and conduit assembly electrical connector, as applicable, and
corrective actions if necessary. This AD results from fuel system
reviews conducted by the manufacturer. We are issuing this AD to detect
and correct the potential for an arc/spark condition to occur within
the fuel boost or transfer pump conduit assembly connectors and
propagate into the forward and aft auxiliary fuel tanks, which could
result in a fire or explosion.

DATES: This AD is effective June 21, 2010.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of June 21,
2010.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800-0019, Long Beach, California 90846-
0001; telephone 206-544-5000, extension 2; fax 206-766-5683; e-mail
dse.boecom@boeing.com; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Bond, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-4137;
telephone (562) 627-5253; fax (562) 627-5210.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to
certain Model DC-9-30, DC-9-40, and DC-9-50 series airplanes. That NPRM
was published in the Federal Register on August 12, 2009 (74 FR 40525).
That NPRM proposed to require inspecting to determine the part numbers
of the forward and aft auxiliary tank fuel boost and transfer pump
conduit/conduit

[[Page 27402]]

assembly and conduit assembly electrical connector, as applicable, and
corrective actions if necessary.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comment received from the commenter.
Northwest Airlines (NWA) concurs with the intent of the NPRM.

Request To Delay Issuance of the Final Rule Until the Revised Service
Bulletin Is Issued, Reviewed, and Commented On by Operators

    NWA states that operators should have the opportunity to review and
comment on the revised service bulletin prior to any final rule
decision. NWA explains that there are omissions regarding airplane
effectivity and part number discrepancies in Boeing Service Bulletin
DC9-28-227, dated April 23, 2009. NWA notes that Boeing was notified of
these issues, and that Boeing concurs with the effectivity problems and
noted the differences in the associated wiring diagrams and drawings
that affect the part numbers. NWA asserts that Boeing has acknowledged
that Boeing Service Bulletin DC9-28-227, dated April 23, 2009, needs to
be revised.
    NWA believes that certain airplanes were delivered with a 780
gallon forward fuselage supplemental tank but without a 780 gallon aft
fuselage supplemental tank, and that these airplanes may not be
addressed as a group in Boeing Service Bulletin DC9-28-227, dated April
23, 2009.
    NWA also believes that certain airplanes identified as Group 1 in
Boeing Service Bulletin DC9-28-227, dated April 23, 2009, have the same
conduit assembly part number as other airplanes. NWA believes that
these airplanes cannot use the same conduit assembly because conduit
assemblies have specified wire numbers as per certain drawings.
    From these statements, we infer that NWA requests that we delay
issuing the AD until Boeing Service Bulletin DC9-28-227, dated April
23, 2009, is revised and released. We do not agree to delay issuing the
final rule until a revised service bulletin is reviewed and commented
on by operators. The airplanes that NWA believes were delivered with a
780 gallon forward fuselage supplemental tank but without a 780 gallon
aft supplemental fuselage tank, and that may not be addressed as a
group in Boeing Service Bulletin DC9-28-227, dated April 23, 2009, are
not included in the effectivity of that service bulletin because they
already had the acceptable conduit assembly installed prior to the time
of delivery. Also, Boeing Service Bulletin DC9-28-227, dated April 23,
2009, reflects the correct conduit part numbers installed prior to the
time of airplane delivery; therefore, the content in Boeing Service
Bulletin DC9-28-227, dated April 23, 2009, is correct. We have
confirmed with Boeing that Boeing Service Bulletin DC9-28-227, dated
April 23, 2009, does not need to be revised regarding these issues. We
have not changed the AD in this regard.
    If a new revision to the service information is published, under
the provisions of paragraph (h) of the final rule, we will consider
requests for alternative methods of compliance (AMOCs) if sufficient
data are submitted to substantiate that the change would provide an
acceptable level of safety. We have not changed the AD in this regard.

Request for a Clarification Statement Acknowledging Post-Production
Removal of Auxiliary Fuel Tank(s)

    NWA states that the final rule should include a clarification
statement for paragraph (g) of the NPRM that acknowledges post-
production removal of an auxiliary fuel tank, which releases the
operator from those requirements of Boeing Service Bulletin DC9-28-227,
dated April 23, 2009, that are no longer applicable. NWA explains that
Boeing Service Bulletin DC9-28-227, dated April 23, 2009, does not
address the issue of a removed auxiliary fuel tank and that the
equipment effectivity list quantifies airplane groups at the time of
production and does not address post-production modifications to the
airplane. NWA acknowledges that an auxiliary fuel tank, which was
installed at the time of production, may have been removed by operators
for a variety of reasons. NWA asserts that the removal of the auxiliary
fuel tank and thereby the fuel boost or transfer pump conduit assembly
connectors removes the unsafe condition specified in paragraph (e) of
the NPRM, although the language specified in paragraph (g) of the NPRM
will still require operators to request an AMOC for removed auxiliary
fuel tanks.
    We agree. If the auxiliary fuel tank(s) has been removed, thereby
removing the fuel boost or transfer fuel pump conduit assembly
connectors, the unsafe condition is removed as well. We have revised
paragraph (g) of the final rule to account for auxiliary fuel tank(s)
that have been removed.

Explanation of Change Made to This AD

    We have revised this AD to identify the legal name of the
manufacturer as published in the most recent type certificate data
sheet for the affected airplane models.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the
AD with the changes described previously. We also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.

Explanation of Change to Costs of Compliance

    Since issuance of the NPRM, we have increased the labor rate used
in the Costs of Compliance from $80 per work-hour to $85 per work-hour.
The Costs of Compliance information, below, reflects this increase in
the specified hourly labor rate.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 137 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
also estimate that it takes up to 8 work-hours per product to comply
with this AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to
be $93,160, or $680 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a

[[Page 27403]]

substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2010-10-20 McDonnell Douglas Corporation: Amendment 39-16299. Docket
No. FAA-2009-0685; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-113-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective June 21,
2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to McDonnell Douglas Corporation Model DC-9-
31, DC-9-32, DC-9-32 (VC-9C), DC-9-32F, DC-9-33F, DC-9-34, DC-9-34F,
and DC-9-32F (C-9A, C-9B), DC-9-41, and DC-9-51 airplanes,
certificated in any category; as identified in Boeing Service
Bulletin DC9-28-227, dated April 23, 2009.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28: Fuel.

Unsafe Condition

    (e) This AD results from fuel system reviews conducted by the
manufacturer. The Federal Aviation Administration is issuing this AD
to detect and correct the potential for an arc/spark condition to
occur within the fuel boost or transfer pump conduit assembly
connectors and propagate into the forward and aft auxiliary fuel
tanks, which could result in a fire or explosion.

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Inspection

    (g) Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD,
inspect to determine the part numbers of the forward and aft
auxiliary fuel tank boost and transfer pumps conduit assembly and
conduit assembly electrical connector, as applicable, and do
applicable corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin DC9-28-227, dated April 23,
2009. Do the applicable corrective actions before further flight. If
the auxiliary fuel tank(s) has been removed, thereby removing the
fuel boost or transfer fuel pump conduit assembly connectors, the
corrective action specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Service Bulletin DC9-28-227, dated April 23, 2009, is not
required. If the removed auxiliary fuel tank(s) are re-installed,
the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD must be done before
further flight.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (h)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: William Bond, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion
Branch, ANM-140L, FAA, Los Angeles ACO, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, California 90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5253; fax (562)
627-5210.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (i) You must use Boeing Service Bulletin DC9-28-227, dated April
23, 2009, to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD
specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800-0019, Long Beach, California 90846-
0001; telephone 206-544-5000, extension 2; fax 206-766-5683; e-mail
dse.boecom@boeing.com; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 3, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-11185 Filed 5-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P