Document ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0173-0246
Agency: epa
Document Type: Notice
Title: Meetings: Proposed List of Potential Peer Reviewers, Estimating Exposures and Incremental Health Effects in Public and Commercial Buildings
Posted Date: 2014-09-29T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 188 (Monday, September 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58339-58341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23114]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0173; FRL-9916-70]

Announcement of Meeting Dates and Opportunity for Public Comments 
on Proposed List of Potential Peer Reviewers for an Approach for 
Estimating Exposures and Incremental Health Effects From Lead Due to 
Renovation, Repair, and Painting Activities in Public and Commercial 
Buildings

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agency is requesting public comments on the proposed list 
of candidate peer reviewers for the independent contractor-managed 
external peer review of the draft documents released for public comment 
in the August 6, 2014 Federal Register notice entitled ``Approach for 
Estimating Exposures and Incremental Health Effects from Lead Due to 
Renovation, Repair, and Painting Activities in Public and Commercial 
Buildings.'' This notice provides the names and professional 
affiliations of the proposed peer reviewers. The public is requested to 
provide relevant information or documentation on the candidates who are 
being evaluated by the external peer review contractor, Versar, Inc. 
(Versar). Versar will consider the public comments on the proposed list 
of peer reviewers and will select the final peer reviewers who, 
collectively, best provide expertise spanning the multiple subject 
matter areas covered by the draft documents and, to the extent 
feasible, best provide a balance of perspectives according to EPA peer 
review guidance. This notice provides the public peer review meeting 
dates as well as Versar's Web site that will provide details about the 
meeting location, how to register to attend the meeting either in 
person or electronically, and how to provide comments at the meeting. 
The date, time, and conference call-in number of the initial meeting of 
the peer review panel can be obtained at Versar's peer review Web site.

DATES: 
    Meeting: A 2-day panel meeting will be held on January 13, and 14, 
2015, see Unit IV. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
    Comments: Comments must be received on or before October 20, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Meeting: Details regarding the meeting in Washington, DC, 
will be posted on Versar's Web site, see Unit IV. of the SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION.
    Comments: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification 
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0173, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit 
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business 
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted 
by statute.
     Mail: Document Control Office (7407M), Office of Pollution 
Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand 
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the 
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.

Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along 
with more

[[Page 58340]]

information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    For technical information contact: Stan Barone, Jr., Risk 
Assessment Division (7403M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number (202) 564-1169; email 
address: barone.stan@epa.gov.
    For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202) 
554-1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are in the 
environmental and human health assessment field; independent 
contractors and contracting companies involved in renovation, repair, 
and painting; or members of the public interested in the assessment of 
chemical risks. The following list of North American Industrial 
Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, 
but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this 
document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include:
     Building construction (NAICS code 236).
     Specialty trade contractors (NAICS code 238).
     Real estate (NAICS code 531).
     Other general governmental support (NAICS code 921).

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through 
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the 
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or 
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as 
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the 
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as 
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information 
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. 
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with 
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting 
your comments, see the commenting tips at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.

II. Background

    EPA has prepared draft documents related to estimating exposures 
and incremental health effects from lead due to renovation, repair, and 
paining activities (RRP) in public and commercial buildings (P&CBs) for 
purposes of public comment (scientific views) and peer review. As 
discussed in the Federal Register of August 6, 2014 (79 FR 45796) (FRL-
9914-12) (http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-08-06/pdf/2014-18357.pdf), when finalizing the draft documents, EPA will consider any 
public comments and peer reviewer comments submitted.
    Once the analytical support documents are finalized, they will be 
utilized in the process of determining whether or not lead-based paint 
hazards are created by RRP activities in P&CBs, as required under TSCA, 
Subtitle IV (15 U.S.C. 2681 et seq.). For those renovation activities 
in P&CBs that create lead-based paint hazards, TSCA directs EPA to 
address the hazards through regulation.
    The draft documents are available through http://www.regulations.gov (docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0173).

III. Process of Obtaining Candidate Reviewers

    Consistent with guidelines for the peer review of influential 
scientific assessments, EPA tasked Versar to assemble approximately 10-
12 scientific experts to evaluate the draft documents cited in this 
notice. As part of the peer review process, a public nomination period 
was held from June 27, 2014, to July 18, 2014, during which members of 
the public were able to nominate scientific experts with knowledge and 
experience in one or more of the following areas:
    1. Multimedia routes of human exposure to lead.
    2. Modeling of multimedia human exposures.
    3. Lead exposure pathway assessment.
    4. Lead uptake/absorption.
    5. Internal biokinetic distribution and physiological effects of 
lead.
    6. Tissue concentrations of lead.
    7. Human growth and activity patterns.
    8. Exposure assessment modeling.
    9. Lead-induced health effects.
    10. Risk assessment and uncertainty characterization.

Versar also conducted an independent search for scientific experts to 
augment the list of publically nominated candidates. In total, Versar 
evaluated the 18 candidates nominated during the public nomination 
period and Versar identified more than 40 additional candidates.
     Selection process. Versar considered and screened all 
candidates against the selection criteria described in the Federal 
Register notice of June 27, 2014 (79 FR 36511) (FRL-9912-63) (http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-06-27/pdf/2014-15123.pdf), which included 
having demonstrated expertise in the areas described, being free of any 
conflict of interest, being free of appearance of bias, and being 
available to participate in-person in a 2-day peer review meeting in 
the Washington, DC area on January 13 and 14, 2015. Following the 
screening process, Versar narrowed the list of potential reviewers to 
15 proposed candidates. This notice solicits comments on the proposed 
list of 15 candidates. The public is requested to provide relevant 
information or documentation on the candidates who are being evaluated 
by Versar. Versar will consider the public comments on the proposed 
list of peer reviewers and will post the final list of peer reviewers 
on their Web site (https://peerreview.versar.com/epa/lead).
     Responsibilities of Peer Reviewers. Peer reviewers will be 
charged with evaluating and preparing written comments on the draft 
documents. Specifically, reviewers will provide general comments, their 
overall impressions of the draft documents, and respond to the peer 
review charge questions. They will consider public comments submitted 
to the docket (docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0173).
    Following the peer review meeting, Versar will provide a peer 
review summary report to EPA containing the comments and 
recommendations from the peer reviewers. The final peer review report 
will also be made available to the public on Versar's Web site. In 
preparing the final form of analytical support document, EPA will 
consider Versar's peer review report which includes comments and 
recommendations from the external peer review meeting, as well as 
written public comments received through the docket.

IV. Registration for Initial Conference Call and Public Panel Meeting

    Registrations can be made via Versar's Web site (https://peerreview.versar.com/epa/lead) for a public peer review panel

[[Page 58341]]

meeting via conference call/webinar that will cover initial ground 
rules of the peer review, overview of the peer review charge and 
overview of draft documents provided to the peer reviewers. The date, 
time, and access code for this conference call/webinar will be 
available on the same registration Web site.
    Following the initial conference call/webinar, a 2-day panel 
meeting will be held on January 13 and 14, 2015, in the Washington, DC 
area. Specific details regarding the meeting location, registration for 
personal or electronic attendance, and presentation of comments will be 
posted on Versar's Web site (https://peerreview.versar.com/epa/lead).

V. Proposed List of Peer Reviewers

    EPA requests that no individual or organization contact in any way 
its contractor or the subcontractor panel members regarding the subject 
of the peer review meeting, send contractor written materials regarding 
the subject of the meeting, or make any offers or requests to any of 
them that appear to be linked to their participation in the peer 
review. The contractor shall direct the panel members to report any 
such contacts, who will take appropriate action in consultation with 
EPA to ensure the independence and impartiality of the peer review.
    Following are the names and professional affiliations of the 
current candidates being considered for the external peer review of the 
draft documents. A biosketch for the proposed peer reviewers will be 
posted in the docket (docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0173) and on 
Versar's Web site (https://peerreview.versar.com/epa/lead). Versar will 
select peer reviewers who, collectively, best provide expertise 
spanning the multiple required areas of expertise listed Unit III. and, 
to the extent feasible, best provide a balance of perspectives.
    1. Deborah Cory-Slechta, Ph. D., University of Rochester, Proposed 
Chairperson.
    2. Panos Georgopoulos, Ph.D., Rutgers University.
    3. Phillip Goodrum, Ph.D., Integral Consulting, Inc.
    4. Dale Hattis, Ph.D., Clark University.
    5. Andrew Hunt, Ph.D., University of Texas, Arlington, TX.
    6. Naila Khalil, Ph.D., M.B.B.S., M.P.H., Wright State University.
    7. Andy Menke, Ph.D., M.P.H., Social & Scientific Systems, Inc.
    8. Howard Mielke, Ph.D., Tulane University.
    9. Paul Mushak, Ph.D., PB Associates.
    10. Rosalind Schoof, Ph.D., ENVIRON.
    11. Joel Schwartz, Ph.D., M.D., Harvard University.
    12. Anne Steenhout, Ph.D., Universit[eacute] Libre de Buxelles.
    13. Ken Unice, M.S., Cardno ChemRisk.
    14. Ian von Lindern, Ph.D., PE, Terra Graphics Environmental 
Engineering, Inc.
    15. Kathleen Vork, Ph.D., M.P.H., California Environmental 
Protection Agency.

    Authority:  15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.

    Dated: September 19, 2014.
Wendy C. Hamnett,
Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
[FR Doc. 2014-23114 Filed 9-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P