Document ID: SEC-2022-1177-0001
Agency: sec
Document Type: Notice
Title: Application: 24X National Exchange, LLC; Registration as a National Securities Exchange
Posted Date: 2022-09-07T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54736-54746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-19264]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-95651; File No. 10-239]

In the Matter of the Application of 24X National Exchange LLC for 
Registration as a National Securities Exchange; Order Instituting 
Proceedings To Determine Whether To Grant or Deny an Application for 
Registration as a National Securities Exchange Under Section 6 of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

September 1, 2022.

I. Introduction

    On March 25, 2022, 24X National Exchange LLC (``24X'' or 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') a Form 1 application under the Securities Exchange Act 
of 1934 (``Act''), seeking registration as a national securities 
exchange under Section 6 of the Act.\1\ Notice of the application was 
published for comment in the Federal Register on June 6, 2022.\2\ The 
Commission received three comments on the application.\3\ As discussed 
further below, the commenters stated that 24X's application does not 
include sufficient information about several aspects of its proposed 
operation.\4\ One commenter stated that the application ``does not meet 
the legal and administrative requirements'' under the Act.\5\ Another 
commenter questioned whether ``24X has the necessary structure and 
checks in place to protect investors and ensure a fair and orderly 
market'' and stated that certain elements of 24X's proposal were not 
sufficiently described and that additional information was required to 
evaluate the proposal.\6\ This commenter stated that 24X ``contemplates 
trading concepts that have not been tested within the U.S. equities 
markets'' and that the application raises a number of questions 
``including how its new exchange will interact with the current trading 
ecosystem.'' \7\ Another commenter stated that the 24X Form 1 should 
not be approved because the regulatory infrastructure necessary to 
support its proposed trading system does not yet exist.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \2\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 95007 (May 31, 
2022), 87 FR 34333 (``Notice'').
    \3\ See letters from Brian Hyndman, President and Chief 
Executive Officer, Blue Ocean ATS, LLC, dated July 21, 2022 (``Blue 
Ocean Letter''); Eun Ah Choi, Senior Vice President, The Nasdaq 
Stock Market LLC, dated July 21, 2022 (``Nasdaq Letter''); and Hope 
Jarkowski, General Counsel, NYSE Group, dated July 29, 2022 (``NYSE 
Letter'') to Vanessa A. Countryman, Secretary, Commission. The 
public comment file for 24X's Form 1 application (File No. 10-239) 
is available on the Commission's website at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/10-239/10-239.htm.
    \4\ See Blue Ocean Letter at 2-6, Nasdaq Letter at 2-5 and NYSE 
Letter at 2-4.
    \5\ See Blue Ocean Letter at 6.
    \6\ See Nasdaq Letter at 5.
    \7\ Id.
    \8\ See NYSE Letter at 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(a)(1) of the Act \9\ requires the Commission, within 
ninety days of the date of publication of notice of an application for 
registration as a national securities exchange, or such longer period 
as to which the applicant consents, to, by order, grant such 
registration \10\ or institute proceedings to determine whether such 
registration should be denied.\11\ This order is instituting 
proceedings under Section 19(a)(1)(B) of the Act \12\ to determine 
whether 24X's application for registration as a national securities 
exchange should be granted or denied, and provides notice of the 
grounds for denial under consideration by the Commission, as set forth 
below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(a)(1).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(a)(1)(A).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78a(a)(1)(B).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(a)(1)(B).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 54737]]

II. Description of 24X's Proposed Trading System

    According to 24X's Form 1, 24X proposes to operate a fully 
automated electronic trading platform for the trading of listed NMS 
stocks pursuant to unlisted trading privileges (``UTP'').\13\ 24X would 
not maintain a physical trading floor.\14\ Liquidity would be derived 
from quotes as well as orders to buy and orders to sell submitted to 
24X electronically by exchange members \15\ from remote locations.\16\ 
The Exchange proposes to operate an electronic limit order book with a 
continuous matching function. Orders resting on the book would be 
ranked in price/time priority.\17\ 24X proposes to accept market 
orders, limit orders and pegged orders with various modifiers and time-
in-force instructions.\18\ Orders may be submitted in round lots, mixed 
lots or odd-lots.\19\ One novel feature of 24X's proposal is that it 
proposes to allow the unit of trading of an order to be 1/1,000th of a 
share.\20\ 24X proposes to report executions to the appropriate 
consolidated transaction reporting system ``to the extent required by 
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.'' \21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Exhibit E of 24X's Form 1 at 1, 4.
    \14\ Id. at 1.
    \15\ 24X proposes to have one class of membership open to 
registered broker-dealers. See proposed 24X Rule 2.3 (stating that, 
``any registered broker or dealer that is and remains a member of a 
national securities association registered under Section 15A(a) of 
the Act or a member of another national securities exchange 
registered under Section 6(a) of the Act shall be eligible to be, 
and to remain, a Member.'').
    \16\ See Exhibit E of 24X's Form 1 at 1.
    \17\ Proposed 24X Rule 11.8(a).
    \18\ Proposed 24X Rule 11.7. See also Exhibit B-1 of 24X's Form 
1.
    \19\ Proposed 24X Rule 11.6(q). See also Exhibit E-1 of 24X's 
Form 1 at 4.
    \20\ Proposed 24X Rule 11.6(q).
    \21\ Proposed 24X Rule 11.11(a); see also Exhibit E to 24X Form 
1 at 10 (stating that 24X intends to join the CTA and Nasdaq UTP 
Plans).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    24X proposes a retail order program.\22\ Pursuant to this program, 
retail orders \23\ submitted by retail organization members \24\ would 
be eligible to receive price improvement from retail market makers.\25\ 
Pursuant to proposed 24X Rule 11.21(d)(2), retail market makers would 
be required to provide continuous two-sided quotes of at least 100 
shares during ``Regular Trading Hours.'' \26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ Proposed 24X Rules 11.17-11.21.
    \23\ See proposed 24X Rule 11.17(a)(2) for the proposed 
definition of ``retail order.''
    \24\ See proposed 24X Rule 11.17(a)(1) for the proposed 
definition of ``retail organization member.''
    \25\ See proposed 24X Rule 11.18 for the proposed registration 
requirements for retail market makers.
    \26\ The term ``Regular Trading Hours'' is not defined in the 
proposed 24X rule book. See Exhibit B-1 to the 24X Form 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed further below, one novel feature of 24X's proposed 
trading rules is that 24X proposes to allow trading in NMS stocks 24 
hours a day, 7 days per week, 365 days a year.\27\ 24X has proposed 
specific rules to govern trading during regular trading hours \28\ as 
well as trading outside of regular trading hours.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ See proposed 24X Rule 11.1 (describing the hours of trading 
and trading days for 24X).
    \28\ Regulation NMS Rule 600(b)(77) defines ``regular trading 
hours'' as ``the time between 9:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time . 
. .'' As described further below, 24X proposes to define four 
different trading sessions. See proposed 24X Rules 1.5(b), defining 
the ``24X Market Session''; 1.5(k) defining the ``Core Market 
Session''; 1.5(v) defining the ``Post-market Session''; and 1.5(w) 
defining the ``Pre-Market Session.''
    \29\ See e.g., proposed 24X Rule 11.16 (describing what orders 
are eligible for execution outside of regular trading hours).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Proceedings To Determine Whether To Grant or Deny the Application 
and Grounds for Potential Denial Under Consideration

    As required by Section 19(a)(1)(B) of the Act,\30\ the Commission 
is hereby providing notice of grounds for denial under consideration, 
as set forth below. Institution of such proceedings is appropriate at 
this time in view of the issues raised by the application. Institution 
of proceedings does not indicate that the Commission has reached any 
conclusions with respect to any of the issues involved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(a)(1)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under Section 19(a)(1) of the Act, the Commission shall grant an 
application for registration as a national securities exchange if the 
Commission finds that the requirements of the Act and the rules and 
regulations thereunder with respect to the applicant are satisfied. The 
Commission shall deny such application for registration if it does not 
make such a finding.\31\ Under Section 6(b) of the Act, an exchange 
shall not be registered as a national securities exchange unless the 
Commission determines that it has satisfied the relevant requirements 
of the Act.\32\ In particular, Section 6(b)(1) of the Act requires that 
the Commission find that an exchange is so organized and has the 
capacity to carry out the purposes of the Act.\33\ In addition, under 
Section 6(b)(3) of the Act, the Commission must find that the rules of 
the exchange assure a fair representation of its members in the 
selection of its directors and administration of its affairs and 
provide that one or more directors shall be representative of issuers 
and investors and not be associated with a member of the exchange, 
broker or dealer.\34\ Section 6(b)(5) of the Act requires that the 
rules of the exchange be designed, among other things, to prevent 
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, promote just and 
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination 
with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing 
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in 
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a 
free and open market and a national market system, and in general to 
protect investors and the public interest.\35\ Finally, under Section 
6(b)(8) of the Act, the Commission must find that the rules of the 
exchange do not impose any burden on competition that is not necessary 
or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of Act.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(a)(1).
    \32\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \33\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
    \34\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(3).
    \35\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \36\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is particularly interested in commenters' views as 
to whether 24X has provided sufficient information in its Form 1 to 
support a finding that the proposal is consistent with the requirements 
of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(a)(1). See also NYSE Letter at 2 (``the 
application falls short in providing sufficient information upon 
which to assess how such innovations could function consistent 
either with the Act . . .''); Nasdaq Letter at 2; and Blue Ocean 
Letter at 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Commission is particularly interested in 
commenters' views as to whether the proposed rules relating to the 
corporate structure of 24X, as described in more detail below, would 
ensure that 24X is so organized and has the capacity to carry out the 
purposes of the Act and assure a fair representation of its members in 
the selection of its directors and administration of its affairs.
    The Commission also is particularly interested in commenters' views 
as to whether 24X's proposed rules that would extensively expand the 
hours of trading in NMS stocks, as described in more detail below, are 
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, 
promote just and equitable principles of trade, foster cooperation and 
coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, 
processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions 
in securities, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a 
free

[[Page 54738]]

and open market and a national market system, and in general protect 
investors and the public interest.
    Further, the Commission is particularly interested in commenters' 
views as to whether 24X's proposed rules to allow orders to be 
submitted in fractional shares are designed to foster cooperation and 
coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, 
processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions 
in securities, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a 
free and open market and a national market system.
    Additionally, the Commission is particularly interested in 
commenters' views as to whether 24X's proposal to locate a ``mirrored'' 
primary platform in London would result in 24X being so organized and 
have the capacity to be able to carry out the purposes of the Act and 
whether 24X's rules relating to the mirrored platform are designed to 
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, 
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and 
facilitating transactions in securities, and to remove impediments to 
and perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market and a national 
market system.

A. Corporate Governance

1. 24X
    24X is wholly-owned by its direct parent company, 24X US Holdings 
LLC (``US Holdings''), which in turn is wholly-owned by 24X Bermuda 
Holdings LLC (``Bermuda Holdings'').\38\ 24X is a Delaware limited 
liability company whose sole member is US Holdings.\39\ The proposed 
business and affairs of 24X will be managed under the direction of a 
Board that is proposed to have at a minimum six Directors once 24X 
commences operations as a national securities exchange.\40\ As 
proposed, the 24X Board would consist of
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ See Exhibits A and C of 24X's Form 1.
    \39\ See Exhibit A-2 of 24X's Form 1 at 1.
    \40\ See Exhibit A-2 of 24X's Form 1 at 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     one Director who is the Chief Executive Officer of the 
Company;
     at minimum three ``Independent Directors'' \41\; and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \41\ ``Independent Directors'' are proposed to be defined as a 
``Director who has no material relationship with the Company or any 
affiliate of the Company, or any Exchange Member or any affiliate of 
any such Exchange Member; provided, however, that an individual who 
otherwise qualifies as an Independent Director shall not be 
disqualified from serving in such capacity solely because such 
Director is a Director of the Company or an affiliate thereof.'' See 
Exhibit A-2 of 24X's Form 1 at 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     the number of ``Membership Representative Directors'' \42\ 
which shall be at least twenty percent of the Board, provided that if 
twenty percent of the Directors then serving on the Board is not a 
whole number, such minimum number of ``Representative Directors'' \43\ 
shall be rounded up to the next whole number.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \42\ ``Member Representative Director'' is proposed to be 
defined as a Director ``who has been elected or appointed to the 
Board from time to time in accordance with this Agreement after 
having been nominated by the Member Nominating Committee. A Member 
Representative Director must be an officer, director, employee, or 
agent of an Exchange Member.'' See Exhibit A-2 of 24X's Form 1 at 3.
    \43\ ``Representative Directors'' are not defined in the Limited 
Liability Company Agreement of 24X National Exchange LLC (``24X LLC 
Agreement'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The 24X LLC Agreement also provides for ``Public Directors'' \44\ 
although none are proposed to serve on the 24X Board.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \44\ See Exhibit A-2 of 24X's Form 1 at 7. ``Public Directors'' 
are not defined in the 24X LLC Agreement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed Nominating Committee of 24X would nominate candidates 
for election to the 24X Board.\45\ For positions on the 24X Board 
requiring persons who qualify as Member Representative Directors, the 
proposed Nominating Committee would nominate only those persons whose 
names have been approved and submitted by the ``Member Nominating 
Committee.'' \46\ Nominees to the 24X Board from both the proposed 
Nominating Committee and the proposed Member Nominating Committee would 
be elected on an annual basis by vote of U.S. Holdings.\47\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \45\ See Exhibit A-2 of 24X's Form 1 at 9. According to the 
proposed Nominating Committee Charter, the Nominating Committee 
shall consist of at least three members, or such greater number as 
determined by the Board, each of whom shall be an ``Independent 
Director,'' as such term is proposed to be defined in the Limited 
Liability Company Agreement of the Exchange. See Exhibit J-4 of 
24X's Form 1 at 1.
    \46\ The ``Member Nominating Committee'' is defined to mean 
``the Member Nominating Committee elected pursuant to [the 24X 
Limited Liability Company Agreement].'' See Exhibit A-2 of 24X's 
Form 1 at 1. According to the Member Nominating Committee Charter, 
the Member Nominating Committee shall consist of at least three 
members, or such greater number as determined by the Board, two of 
whom shall be a Member Representative Director and one of whom shall 
be an `Independent Director,' as such term is defined in the Limited 
Liability Company Agreement of the Exchange.'' See Exhibit J-3 of 
24X's Form 1 at 1.
    \47\ See Exhibit A-2 of 24X's Form 1 at 9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the past, the Commission has stated that ensuring that at least 
20% of an exchange's governing board is comprised of directors that are 
chosen and elected by the exchange's members helps to ensure the fair 
representation of members in the selection of directors and the 
administration of an exchange as required by Section 6(b)(3) of the 
Act.\48\ The Commission has stated that this requirement helps to 
ensure that members have a voice in an exchange's self-regulatory 
program, and that an exchange is administered in a way that is 
equitable to all those who trade on its market or through its 
facilities.\49\ The Commission also has stated that a process whereby 
exchange members can directly nominate candidates for directors for an 
exchange board via a petition process also helps to ensure the fair 
representation of members, consistent with Section 6(b)(3) of the 
Act.\50\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \48\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88806 (May 4, 2020), 85 
FR 27451 (May 8, 2020) (File No. 10-237) (order granting 
registration of MEMX LLC) (``MEMX Order'') at 27452. See also 15 
U.S.C. 78f(b)(3).
    \49\ See, e.g., MEMX Order, supra note 48 at 27452; Securities 
Exchange Act Release Nos. 85828 (May 10, 2019), 84 FR 21841 (May 15, 
2019) (File No. 10-234) (order granting registration of Long Term 
Stock Exchange, Inc.) (``LTSE Order'') at 21843; 79543 (December 13, 
2016), 81 FR 92901, 92903 (December 20, 2016) (File No. 10-227) 
(order granting registration of MIAX PEARL, LLC) (``MIAX PEARL 
Order'') at 92903. See also Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 
68341 (December 3, 2012), 77 FR 73065, 73067 (December 7, 2012) 
(File No. 10-207) (order granting the registration of Miami 
International Securities Exchange, LLC); 58375 (August 18, 2008), 73 
FR 49498, 49501 (August 21, 2008) (File No. 10-182) (order granting 
the registration of BATS Exchange, Inc.); and 53128 (January 13, 
2006), 71 FR 3550, 3553 (January 23, 2006) (File No. 10-131) 
(granting the exchange registration of Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.) 
(``Nasdaq Order'').
    \50\ See e.g., MEMX Order, supra note 48, at 27452; LTSE Order, 
supra note 49, at 21843; and MIAX PEARL Order, supra note 49, at 
92903.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is considering whether the overall composition of 
the 24X Board, including the specific categories of Directors as 
defined in the 24X LLC Agreement, would enable 24X to be so organized 
and have the capacity to carry out the purposes of the Act consistent 
with Section 6(b)(1) of the Act \51\. As proposed, there are categories 
of Directors that are not defined in the 24X LLC Agreement.\52\ In 
addition, the Commission is considering whether the 24X Board 
composition fulfills the statutory requirement that one or more 
directors on the 24X Board is representative of issuers and investors 
and not associated with a member of the exchange, broker or dealer.\53\ 
The Commission also is considering whether

[[Page 54739]]

the proposed process for nominating candidates for the Member 
Representative Directors positions on the 24X Board is consistent with 
the Section 6(b)(3) of the Act in light of the fact that 24X does not 
propose a process that would permit 24X Members to directly nominate 
such Member Representative Directors for election to the 24X Board.\54\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \51\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
    \52\ See supra notes 43 and 44.
    \53\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(3). The Commission has approved in the 
past an exchange board composition that requires that the number of 
``Non-Industry Directors'' equal or exceed the number of ``Industry 
Directors'' and directors that represent the exchange's members. 
With respect to this compositional requirement, the Commission 
stated that this requirement supports an exchange's ability to 
protect the public interest. See e.g., MEMX Order, supra note 48, at 
27452; LTSE Order, supra note 49, at 21843; MIAX PEARL Order, supra 
note 49, at 92903.
    \54\ See LTSE Order, supra note 49, at 21843 (stating that, 
among other things, the means by which member representatives will 
be chosen will help ensure fair representation of members in 
selection of directors and administration of LTSE, and is therefore 
consistent with Section 6(b)(3) of the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. US Holdings, Bermuda Holdings and Regulation of 24X
    US Holdings is a Delaware limited liability company whose sole 
member is Bermuda Holdings.\55\ As proposed, U.S. Holdings would be 
managed by, and all decisions on behalf of US Holdings would be made 
by, Bermuda Holdings.\56\ Generally, the members of Bermuda Holdings 
include holders of ``Preferred Units'' \57\ (which are further divided 
into ``Series A Units'' and ``Series Seed Units''),\58\ ``Common 
Units'' \59\ and ``Non-Voting Units''.\60\ Members with voting rights, 
or ``Voting Units,'' include Common Units and Preferred Units except 
Series Seed-2 Units, which are a sub-category of Series Seed Units.\61\ 
Each Voting Unit shall have one vote.\62\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \55\ See Exhibit C-12 and C-13 of 24X's Form 1 at 1.
    \56\ See Exhibit C-13 of 24X's Form 1 at 2. Bermuda Holdings is 
a limited liability company formed under the laws of Bermuda. See 
Exhibit C-1 and C-2 of 24X's Form 1 at 1.
    \57\ ``Preferred Units'' are defined to mean ``Series A Units 
and the Series Seed Units.'' See Exhibit C-2 of 24X's Form 1 at 7.
    \58\ See Exhibit C-2 of 24X's Form 1.
    \59\ ``Common Units'' are defined to mean ``[u]nits of common 
membership interests of the Company, or any other ownership 
interests of the Company into which such units are reclassified, 
reconstituted or exchanged.'' See Exhibit C-2 of 24X's Form 1 at 5.
    \60\ ``Non-voting Units'' are defined to mean ``units of non-
voting membership interests of the Company, or any other ownership 
interests of the Company into which such units are reclassified, 
reconstituted or exchanged. See Exhibit C-2 of 24X's Form 1 at 7.
    \61\ See Exhibit C-2 of 24X's Form 1 at 11.
    \62\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If 24X's application for registration as a national securities 
exchange is granted, 24X would have all of the attendant regulatory 
obligations of a national securities exchange under the Act. In 
particular, 24X would be responsible for the operation and regulation 
of its exchange and the regulation of its members. Therefore, the 
Commission is considering whether US Holdings' and Bermuda Holdings' 
activities with respect to the operation of 24X are consistent with, 
and do not interfere with, 24X's self-regulatory obligations.\63\ In 
making this determination previously, the Commission has considered 
whether the governing documents of an exchange's parent company are 
designed to facilitate the ability of the exchange to fulfill its 
regulatory obligations and their impact on Commission oversight of the 
exchange.\64\ For the reasons discussed below, the Commission is 
considering whether US Holdings and Bermuda Holdings are organized in 
such a way as to enable 24X to fulfill its statutory obligations as a 
national securities exchange under Section 6(b) of the Act.\65\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \63\ See 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1). See also Nasdaq Order, supra note 
49, at 3552.
    \64\ See e.g., MEMX Order, supra note 48, at 27453; LTSE Order, 
supra note 49, at 21843; MIAX Pearl Order, supra note 49, at 73069; 
and Nasdaq Order, supra note 49, at 3552.
    \65\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Ownership Structure: Voting and Ownership Concentration Limits. The 
Commission is considering whether the corporate documents of 24X's 
holding companies, which are US Holdings and Bermuda Holdings, contain 
ownership and voting provisions that are designed to prevent the 
holding companies, or any party to the holding companies, from 
exercising undue control over the operation of 24X, and to ensure that 
24X and the Commission are able to carry out their regulatory 
obligations under the Act.\66\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \66\ In some cases, an exchange applicant has been owned by more 
than one holding company. For purposes of this discussion regarding 
24X, the Commission shall refer to ``holding companies'' when 
referring to an entity or entities that own an exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For example, among other things, the Commission has approved 
applications for registration as a national securities exchange where 
the governing documents of the holding companies of the exchange 
provide that for so long as the holding companies shall control, 
directly or indirectly, the exchange, no person, either alone or 
together with its related persons will be permitted to beneficially 
own, directly or indirectly, of record or beneficially, more than 40% 
of the holding company.\67\ The Commission stated that such ownership 
concentration provisions are consistent with the Act because they are 
designed to prevent any party holding an interest in the holding 
companies from exercising undue control over the operation of the 
exchange and to ensure that the exchange and the Commission are able to 
carry out their regulatory obligations under the Act.\68\ The 
Commission has approved provisions setting ownership limitations for 
all national securities exchanges.\69\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \67\ See e.g., MEMX Order, supra note 48, at 27453; LTSE Order, 
supra note 49, at 21844; and MIAX Pearl Order, supra note 49, at 
92905. See also MEMX Holdings LLC Agreement, Article III, Section 
3.5(a)(1); LTSE Group Inc. Certificate, Article IX, subparagraph 
(A)(2)(b)(i)(A); Miami Holdings Certificate, Article NINTH 
(b)(i)(A). The Commission also has approved registration where a 
related provision also requires the exchange to redeem any voting 
interest that was sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of that 
was above the ownership concentration limitation. See e.g., MEMX 
Order, supra note 48 at 27453; LTSE Order, supra note 49, at 21844; 
and MIAX Pearl Order, supra note 49, at 92905. See also MEMX 
Holdings LLC Agreement, Article III, Section 3.7(c); LTSE Group Inc. 
Certificate, Article IX, subparagraph (a)(2)(e); Miami Holdings 
Certificate, Article Ninth (e).
    \68\ See e.g., MEMX Order, supra note 48, at 27455; LTSE Order, 
supra note 49, at 21845; and MIAX PEARL Order, supra note 49, at 
92906.
    \69\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 76998 
(January 29, 2016), 81 FR 6066, 6070-71 (February 4, 2016) (File No. 
10-221) (order granting the exchange registration of ISE Mercury, 
LLC); 70050 (July 26, 2013), 78 FR 46622, 46627 (August 1, 2013) 
(File No. 10-209) (order granting the exchange registration of Topaz 
Exchange LLC (nka ISE Gemini, LLC); 68341 (December 3, 2012), 77 FR 
73065, 73070 (December 7, 2012) (File No. 10-207) (order granting 
the exchange registration of Miami International Securities Exchange 
LLC); 58375 (August 18, 2008), 73 FR 49498, 49500 (August 21, 2008) 
(File No. 10-182) (order granting the exchange registration of BATS 
Exchange, Inc.) (``BATS Order''). See also supra notes 67-68; 
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 62158 (May 24, 2010), 75 FR 
30082 (May 28, 2010) (CBOE-2008-88) (CBOE Demutualization Approval 
Order); 53963 (June 8, 2006), 71 FR 34660 (June 15, 2006) (SR-NSX-
2006-03) (NSX Demutualization Order); 51149 (February 8, 2005), 70 
FR 7531 (February 14, 2005) (SR-CHX-2004-26) (CHX Demutualization 
Order); and 49098 (January 16, 2004), 69 FR 3974 (January 27, 2004) 
(SR-Phlx-2003-73) (Phlx Demutualization Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission also has approved more restrictive conditions for 
broker-dealer members of an exchange applicant; specifically, the 
Commission has approved requirements for holding companies of exchanges 
that prohibit a broker-dealer member of the exchange from beneficially 
owning, directly or indirectly, either alone or together with their 
related persons, more than 20% of voting interest in the exchange 
applicant.\70\ The Commission stated that such ownership limitations on 
broker-dealer members of an exchange applicant are appropriate because 
they are designed to address the conflicts of interest that might 
result from a member of a national securities exchange owning

[[Page 54740]]

interests in the exchange.\71\ The Commission also has previously 
stated that a member's ownership interest in an entity that controls an 
exchange could become so large as to cast doubt on whether the exchange 
may fairly and objectively exercise its self-regulatory 
responsibilities with respect to such member.\72\ The Commission stated 
that such requirements are designed to minimize the potential that a 
person or entity can improperly interfere with or restrict the ability 
of the exchange to effectively carry out its regulatory oversight 
responsibilities under the Act.\73\ The Commission has approved 
provisions setting membership ownership limitations for all national 
securities exchanges.\74\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \70\ See e.g., MEMX Order, supra note 48, at 27453; LTSE Order, 
supra note 49, at 21844; and MIAX Pearl Order, supra note 49, at 
92905. See also MEMX Holdings LLC Agreement, Article III, Section 
3.5(a)(2); LTSE Group Inc. Certificate, Article IX, subparagraph 
(A)(2)(b)(i)(B); Miami Holdings Certificate, Article NINTH 
(b)(i)(B).
    \71\ See MEMX Order, supra note 48, at 27455; LTSE Order, supra 
note 49, at 21845; and MIAX PEARL Order, supra note 49, at 92906.
    \72\ Id. The Commission has further stated that a member that is 
a controlling shareholder of an exchange could seek to exercise that 
controlling influence by directing the exchange to refrain from, or 
the exchange may hesitate to, diligently monitor and conduct 
surveillance of the member's conduct or diligently enforce the 
exchange's rules and the federal securities laws with respect to 
conduct by the member that violates such provisions. Id.
    \73\ See MEMX Order, supra note 48, at 27456; LTSE Order, supra 
note 49, at 21845; and MIAX PEARL Order, supra note 49, at 92906.
    \74\ See supra notes 69-73.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Commission has previously approved voting 
limitations in the corporate documents of the holding companies of 
exchanges that provide that no person, alone or together with its 
related persons, may, directly, indirectly, or pursuant to any 
agreement, vote or cause the voting of voting interest in the exchange, 
or give any consent or proxy with respect to voting units in the 
exchange representing more than 20% of the voting power of the 
exchange.\75\ Similar to the ownership concentration limits, the 
Commission stated that such voting concentration limits are a way to 
minimize the potential that a person or entity can improperly interfere 
with or restrict the ability of the exchange to effectively carry out 
its regulatory oversight responsibilities under the Act through the 
exercise of voting power.\76\ The Commission has approved provisions 
setting voting limitations for all national securities exchanges.\77\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \75\ See e.g., MEMX Order, supra note 48, at 27454; LTSE Order, 
supra note 49, at 21844; MIAX Pearl Order, supra note 49, at 92905. 
See also MEMX Holdings LLC Agreement, Article III, Section 
3.5(a)(iii); LTSEG Certificate, Article IX, subparagraph 
(A)(2)(b)(i)(C); Miami Holdings Certificate, Article NINTH 
(b)(i)(C). Such provisions also applied to any voting agreement, 
plan, or other arrangement, where the effect of such agreement, 
plan, or other arrangement would be to enable any person, either 
alone or together with its related persons, to vote, possess the 
right to vote, or cause the voting of voting interest in the 
exchange that would represent more than 20% of the voting power of 
the then issued and outstanding voting interest in the exchange. See 
MEMX Holdings LLC Agreement, Article III, Section 3.5(a)(iii); LTSEG 
Certificate, Article IX, subparagraph (A)(2)(b)(i)(C).
    \76\ See MEMX Order, supra note 48, at 27456; LTSE Order, supra 
note 49, at 21845; and MIAX PEARL Order, supra note 49, at 92906. 
The Commission also has approved the ability of an exchange to waive 
the ownership and voting concentration limits under certain 
circumstances. See e.g., MEMX Order, supra note 48, at 27454; LTSE 
Order, supra note 49, at 21844; and MIAX PEARL Order, supra note 49, 
at 92905 MEMX Holdings LLC Agreement, Article III, Section 
3.5(b)(ii); LTSEG Certificate, Article IX, subparagraph 
(A)(2)(b)(ii)(B); Miami Holdings Certificate, Article NINTH 
(b)(ii)(B).
    \77\ See supra notes 69, 75-76 .
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is considering whether the Limited Liability Company 
Agreement of 24X US Holdings LLC and the Amended and Restated Limited 
Liability Company Agreement of 24X Bermuda Holdings LLC, as proposed, 
contain provisions that help ensure that 24X is so organized and has 
capacity to carry out the purposes of Section 6(b)(1) of the Act. As 
proposed, there are no ownership or voting concentration limits in 
either the Limited Liability Company Agreement of 24X US Holdings LLC 
or in the Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of 
24X Bermuda Holdings LLC. \78\ Therefore, the Commission is considering 
whether 24X is so organized and has capacity to carry out the purposes 
of Section 6(b)(1) of the Act without undue influence by US Holdings 
and Bermuda Holdings. Further, the Commission is considering whether 
24X retains a sufficient degree of independence to effectively carry 
out its regulatory obligations under the Act. Similarly, because 24X 
does not propose to include any ownership or voting limitations on 24X 
members that might have or acquire an ownership interest in US Holdings 
and Bermuda Holdings, the Commission is considering whether the Limited 
Liability Company Agreement of 24X US Holdings LLC and the Amended and 
Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of 24X Bermuda Holdings 
LLC contain mechanisms to ensure that should a member of 24X own Voting 
Units, such ownership would not interfere with 24X's ability to be so 
organized and have the capacity to carry out the purposes of Section 
6(b)(1) of the Act without undue influence by such member.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \78\ As proposed, Schedule A to the Amended and Restated Limited 
Liability Company Agreement of 24X Bermuda Holdings LLC indicates 
two members, Dmitri Galinov and Point72 Ventures Investments, LLC, 
own 44.76% and 20.09%, respectively, of Bermuda Holdings. See 
Schedule A to Exhibit C-2 of 24X's Form 1. However, Exhibit K of 
24X's Form 1 also indicates that Dmitri Galinov and Point72 Ventures 
Investments, LLC own 35.58% and 15.97% of Bermuda Holdings, 
respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Independence of 24X and Oversight of 24X. In order to be 
granted registration as a national securities exchange, 24X must be 
able to carry out its regulatory responsibilities under, and operate in 
a manner consistent with, the Act. This requires 24X to have the 
ability to carry out its regulatory function independently, and to be 
organized and operate in a fashion consistent with, the Act, 
particularly with Section 6(b)(1) of the Act, which requires, in part, 
an exchange to be so organized and have the capacity to carry out the 
purposes of the Act.\79\ Although neither US Holdings nor Bermuda 
Holdings would themselves carry out 24X's regulatory functions or be 
directly overseen by the Commission, as direct and indirect owners of 
24X, the activities and actions of US Holdings and Bermuda Holdings 
with respect to the operation of 24X must be consistent with, and must 
not interfere with, 24X's regulatory obligations as a national 
securities exchange. Therefore, the Commission is considering whether 
the corporate documents of US Holdings and Bermuda Holdings contain 
provisions that are designed to help maintain the independence of the 
regulatory function of 24X and oversight of 24X by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \79\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission has granted the registration of national securities 
exchanges that have holding company structures.\80\ As part of the 
Commission's analysis of a holding company structure proposed by an 
exchange, the Commission has considered and approved provisions in the 
exchange's holding companies' corporate documents that are designed to 
help ensure that the holding companies of an exchange will enable the 
exchange to operate in a way that facilitates the exchange's ability to 
carry out its regulatory function independently, and to be organized 
and operate in a fashion that is consistent with the Act, particularly 
with Section 6(b)(1) of the Act, which requires, in part, an exchange 
to be so organized and have the capacity to carry out the purposes of 
the Act.\81\ Such provisions generally address: \82\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \80\ See e.g., supra note 69.
    \81\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
    \82\ The Commission has approved provisions addressing 
regulatory independence for all exchanges. See, e.g., Securities 
Exchange Act Release Nos. 76998 (January 29, 2016), 81 FR 6066, 
6071-72 (February 4, 2016) (File No. 10-221) (order granting the 
exchange registration of ISE Mercury, LLC); 70050 (July 26, 2013), 
78 FR 46622, 46627-29 (August 1, 2013) (File No. 10-209) (order 
granting the exchange registration of Topaz Exchange LLC (nka ISE 
Gemini, LLC); 68341 (December 3, 2012), 77 FR 73065, 73070-71 
(December 7, 2012) (File No. 10-207) (order granting the exchange 
registration of Miami International Securities Exchange LLC); 58375 
(August 18, 2008), 73 FR 49498, 49498-99(August 21, 2008) (File No. 
10-182) (order granting the exchange registration of BATS Exchange, 
Inc.) (``BATS Order''). See also infra notes 83-91; Securities 
Exchange Act Release Nos. 62158 (May 24, 2010), 75 FR 30082 (May 28, 
2010) (CBOE-2008-88) (CBOE Demutualization Approval Order); 53963 
(June 8, 2006), 71 FR 34660 (June 15, 2006) (SR-NSX-2006-03) (NSX 
Demutualization Order); 51149 (February 8, 2005).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 54741]]

    Giving Due Regard to a National Securities Exchange's Self-
Regulatory Obligations. A commitment that requires the directors, 
officers, employees and agents of exchange holding companies to give 
due regard to the preservation of the independence of the self-
regulatory function of the exchange and its obligations to investors 
and the general public.\83\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \83\ See e.g., MEMX Order, supra note 48, at 27456; LTSE Order, 
supra note 49, at 21845; and MIAX Pearl Order, supra note 49, at 
92906. See also MEMX Holdings LLC Agreement, Article III, Section 
3.5(a)(iii); LTSE Group Inc. Bylaws, Article X, Section 10.1; Miami 
Holdings Bylaws, Article VII, Section 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Compliance with Federal Securities Laws. A provision that requires 
exchange holding companies and their officers, directors, employees, 
and agents to comply with the federal securities laws and the rules and 
regulations promulgated thereunder and agree to cooperate with the 
Commission and the exchange in respect of the Commission's oversight 
responsibilities.\84\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \84\ See e.g., MEMX Order, supra note 48, at 27456; LTSE Order, 
supra note 49, at 21845-21856; and MIAX Pearl Order, supra note 49, 
at 92906. See also MEMX Holdings LLC Agreement, Article XI, Section 
11.3(h); LTSE Group Inc. Bylaws, Article X, Section 10.4; Miami 
Holdings Bylaws, Article VII, Section 4. The holding companies also 
must take reasonable steps necessary to cause its officers, 
directors, employees and agents to so cooperate. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Submission of Jurisdiction. A provision that requires exchange 
holding companies and their officers, directors, employees, and agents 
to submit to the jurisdiction of the U.S. federal courts, the 
Commission, and the exchange, for purposes of any suit, action or 
proceeding arising out of, or relating to, the exchange's 
activities.\85\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \85\ See e.g., MEMX Order, supra note 48, at 27456; LTSE Order, 
supra note 49, at 21846; and MIAX Pearl Order, supra note 49, at 
92906. See also MEMX Holdings LLC Agreement, Article XV, Section 
15.12(b); LTSE Group Inc. Bylaws, Article X, Section 10.5; Miami 
Holdings Bylaws, Article VII, Section 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Books and Records of a National Securities Exchange Reflecting 
Confidential Information. A provision that requires all books and 
records of an exchange reflecting confidential information pertaining 
to the self-regulatory function of the exchange to be retained in 
confidence by the exchange and its personnel, directors, officers, 
employees, and agents, and will not be used by the exchange for any 
non-regulatory purposes and shall not be made available to any person 
other than to personnel of the Commission, or to other personnel under 
specified conditions.\86\ Similar provisions regarding the treatment of 
confidential information pertaining to the self-regulatory function of 
the exchange apply to the holding companies of an exchange, including 
the directors, officers, employees, and agents of the holding 
companies.\87\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \86\ See e.g., MEMX Order, supra note 48, at 27456; LTSE Order, 
supra note 49, at 21846; and MIAX Pearl Order, supra note 49, at 
92906. See also Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability 
Company Agreement of MEMX LLC, Article XIII, Section 13.1; LTSE, 
Inc. Bylaws, Article XI, Section 11.4; MIAX Pearl Bylaws, Article X, 
Section 10.4.
    \87\ See e.g., MEMX Order, supra note 48, at 27456; LTSE Order, 
supra note 49, at 21846; and MIAX Pearl Order, supra note 49, at 
92906. See also MEMX Holdings LLC Agreement, Article XII, Section 
12.2(c); LTSE Group Inc. Bylaws, Article X, Section 10.2; Miami 
Holdings Bylaws, Article VII, Section 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Books and Records of the Holding Companies. A provision that 
requires the books and records of exchange holding companies to be 
maintained in the United States and, to the extent they are related to 
the operation or administration of the exchange, the holding companies' 
books and records will be subject at all times to inspection and 
copying by the Commission and the exchange,\88\ and to the extent they 
are related to the operation or administration of the exchange, the 
books, records, premises, officers, directors, employees, and agents of 
the holding companies will be deemed to be the books, records, 
premises, officers, directors, employees, and agents of exchange, for 
purposes of, and subject to oversight pursuant to, the Act.\89\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \88\ See e.g., MEMX Order, supra note 48 at 27456; LTSE Order, 
supra note 49, at 21846; and MIAX Pearl Order, supra note 49, at 
92906-92907. See also MEMX Holdings LLC Agreement, Article XII, 
Section 12.2(a) and (b); LTSE Group Inc. Bylaws, Article X, Section 
10.3; Miami Holdings Bylaws, Article VII, Section 3.
    \89\ See e.g., MEMX Order, supra note 48, at 27456; LTSE Order, 
supra note 49, at 21846; and MIAX Pearl Order, supra note 49, at 
92907. See also MEMX Holdings LLC Agreement, Article XII, Section 
12.2(b); LTSE Group Inc. Bylaws, Article X, Section 10.3; Miami 
Holdings Bylaws, Article VII, Section 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consent to Provisions by Holding Company Officers, Directors, 
Employees and Agents. A provision that requires exchange holding 
companies to take reasonable steps necessary to cause its officers, 
directors, employees, and agents, prior to accepting a position with 
the holding companies to consent in writing to the applicability of the 
provisions discussed above, with respect to their activities related to 
the exchange.\90\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \90\ See e.g., MEMX Order, supra note 48, at 27456-27457; LTSE 
Order, supra note 49, at 21846; and MIAX Pearl Order, supra note 49, 
at 92907. See also MEMX Holdings LLC Agreement, Article XIII, 
Section 8.18(b); LTSE Group Inc. Bylaws, Article X, Section 10.6; 
Miami Holdings Bylaws, Article VII, Section 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Changes to Holding Company Constituting Documents to be Filed with 
the Commission. A provision that requires exchange holding companies' 
corporate documents to provide that so long as the holding companies 
control the exchange, any changes to the holding companies' 
constituting documents must be submitted to the exchange governing 
board for approval, and, if such change is required to be filed with 
the Commission pursuant to Section 19(b) of the Act and the rules and 
regulations thereunder, such change shall not be effective until filed 
with and effective by operation of law, or filed with and approved by 
the Commission.\91\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \91\ See e.g., MEMX Order, supra note 48, at 27457; LTSE Order, 
supra note 49, at 21846; and MIAX Pearl Order, supra note 49, at 
92907. See also MEMX Holdings LLC Agreement, Article XV, Section 
15.9(a); LTSEG Certificate, Article IX, Section (A)1 and LTSEG 
Bylaws, Article IX; Miami Holdings Certificate, Article VIII and 
Miami Holdings By-Laws, Article XII, Section 1. This requirement is 
critical as it helps to ensure Commission oversight and approval, as 
appropriate, for any changes to an exchange holding company 
corporate documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is considering whether US Holdings and Bermuda 
Holdings are proposed to be organized in a way that would help maintain 
the independence of the regulatory function of 24X and foster the 
oversight of the exchange by the Commission. 24X has not adopted any of 
these provisions in the Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company 
Agreement of 24X Bermuda Holdings LLC.\92\ Therefore, the Commission is 
considering whether the structure of 24X and its parent companies, US 
Holdings and Bermuda Holdings, help to ensure the independence of 24X's 
regulatory function. Further, the Commission is considering whether the 
structure of 24X and its parent companies helps to ensure that 24X can 
carry out its regulatory responsibilities under, and operate in a 
manner consistent with, the Act. Specifically, the Commission is 
considering whether the proposed structure is consistent with Section 
6(b)(1), which requires, in part, that an exchange to be so organized 
and have

[[Page 54742]]

the capacity to carry out the purposes of the Act.\93\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \92\ See Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company 
Agreement of 24X Bermuda Holdings LLC and the Limited Liability 
Company Agreement of 24X US Holdings LLC.
    \93\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. 24X Trading Sessions

    24X proposes to offer significantly expanded trading outside of 
regular trading hours for NMS stocks by operating a national securities 
exchange 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year, including 
holidays.\94\ 24X proposes to offer four trading sessions--a ``Core 
Market Session'' that corresponds with regular trading hours of 9:30 
a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Eastern time; a ``Post-Market Session'' that would 
run from 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Eastern time on each U.S. business day; 
a ``Pre-Market Session'' that would run from 4:00 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. 
Eastern time on each U.S. business day; and a ``24X Market Session'' 
that would run from 8:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m. Eastern time on each U.S. 
business day, and any time that falls on weekends and holidays.\95\ 
While several exchanges offer a pre-market trading session starting as 
early as 4:00 a.m. Eastern time on each U.S. business day,\96\ and most 
exchanges offer a post-close trading session until 8:00 p.m. Eastern 
time on each business day,\97\ the Commission has not previously 
considered the potential issues arising from an exchange application 
that expands the trading hours for continuous trading as 24X proposes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \94\ Proposed 24X Rule 11.1.
    \95\ Proposed 24X Rule 11.1(a).
    \96\ See, e.g., NYSE Arca, Inc., Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. and 
The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC.
    \97\ See, e.g., NYSE Arca, Inc., NYSE American LLC, NYSE 
Chicago, Inc., NYSE National, Inc., Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc., Cboe 
BYX Exchange, Inc., Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc., Cboe EDGX Exchange, 
Inc., and The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Exchange Trading Hours
    24X refers to the proposed Core Market Session, Pre-Market Session 
and Post-Market Session collectively in its proposed rules as 
``Exchange Trading Hours.'' \98\ 24X proposes to permit orders to be 
entered, canceled, modified, executed on or routed away from the 
Exchange during Exchange Trading Hours.\99\ Orders outstanding at 
7:59:59 p.m. Eastern Time each business day would be automatically 
cancelled.\100\ 24X proposes to permit trading in fractional shares in 
round lots, odd lots, or mixed lots.\101\ Market Orders \102\ and 
pegged orders \103\ would be accepted only during the Core Market 
Session, while limit orders would be accepted during Exchange Trading 
Hours and the 24X Market Session, as discussed below.\104\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \98\ Proposed 24X Rule 11.1(a)(1).
    \99\ Proposed 24X Rule 11.1(b).
    \100\ Proposed 24X Rule 11.1(d).
    \101\ See Proposed 24X Rule 11.6(q) and Exhibit E of 24X's Form 
1 at 4.
    \102\ Proposed 24X Rule 11.7(a)(4).
    \103\ Proposed 24X Rule 11.7(c)(4).
    \104\ Proposed 24X Rule 11.7(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. 24X Market Session
    24X proposes to apply some, but not all, of its rules that would 
apply during Exchange Trading Hours to trading that would occur during 
the 24X Market Session.\105\ For example, market orders \106\ and 
pegged orders \107\ would be prohibited from the 24X Market Session. 
Limit orders,\108\ which would be allowed during the 24X Market 
Session, would be required to have one of the following time-in-force 
(``TIF'') instructions: immediate or cancel (``IOC''),\109\ fill-or-
kill (``FOK'') \110\ or Day+.\111\ In addition, the proposed rules 
would permit orders to be entered, canceled, modified or executed on 
the Exchange, but not routed away, during the 24X Market Session.\112\ 
While the proposed rules would impose continuous two-sided quoting 
obligation on retail market makers during ``Regular Trading Hours,'' 
\113\ the proposed rules would establish no analogous market making 
obligation during the 24X Market Session.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \105\ See, e.g., Proposed 24X Rule 11.16.
    \106\ Proposed 24X Rules 11.7(a)(5) and 11.16(b)(1).
    \107\ Proposed 24X Rules 11.7(c)(5) and 11.16(b)(2).
    \108\ Proposed 24X Rule 11.7(b)(7).
    \109\ Proposed 24X Rule 11.6(o)(1). IOC is defined as an 
instruction the User may attach to an order stating the order is to 
be executed in whole or in part as soon as such order is received. 
The portion not executed immediately on the Exchange or another 
trading center (pursuant to proposed Rule 11.10) is treated as 
cancelled and is not posted to the 24X Book.
    \110\ Proposed 24X Rule 11.6(o)(3). FOK is defined as an 
instruction the User may attach to an order stating that the order 
is to be executed in its entirety as soon as it is received and, if 
not so executed, cancelled. An order with a FOK instruction is not 
eligible for routing away pursuant to proposed Rule 11.10.
    \111\ Proposed 24X Rule 11.6(o)(4). Day+ is defined as an 
instruction the User may attach to an order stating that an order to 
buy or sell is designated for execution starting with the beginning 
of the 24X Market Session and, if not executed, expires at the end 
of the Post-Market Session.
    \112\ Proposed 24X Rules 11.1(c) and 11.10.
    \113\ See supra note 26.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While 24X proposes to join the CTA/CQ and UTP Plans, the 24X 
proposal does not address how real-time consolidated dissemination of 
quotation information and transaction reporting could be available 
during the 24X Market Session because currently, the CTA/CQ and UTP 
Plans do not operate during the times that cover the proposed 24X 
Market Session. One commenter stated that the exclusive SIPs do not 
operate during the 24X Market Session and that therefore the national 
best bid or offer (``NBBO'') would not be disseminated.\114\ This 
commenter asked the Commission to ``consider the potential risks 
related to the lack of transparency, including the risk to investors 
associated with trading during the 24X Trading Session, without a real-
time NBBO and if 24X's proprietary feeds are the only displayed 
liquidity.'' \115\ Another commenter stated that it was unclear how 24X 
could offer after-hours trading in the absence of real time reporting 
or operation of the securities information processors (``SIPs'') and 
that such trading would likely be inconsistent with Regulation NMS Rule 
601.\116\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \114\ See Nasdaq Letter at 2.
    \115\ See Nasdaq Letter at 2. This commenter also stated that it 
did ``not believe that the Application has adequately explained how 
24X's new exchange will interact with, and be integrated into, the 
national market system.''
    \116\ See NYSE Letter at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed 24X Market Session rules relating to risk and 
volatility moderators would also differ from those applicable during 
Exchange Trading Hours. While 24X would participate in the Plan to 
Address Extraordinary Market Volatility (``LULD Plan'') \117\ during 
the Core Market Session,\118\ the LULD Plan currently is not effective 
during the times that 24X proposes to operate the 24X Market Session. 
Consequently, during the 24X Market Session, 24X proposes that the 
Reference Price of a given security would be defined as either the last 
sale price prior to the start of the 24X Market Session or the primary 
market's most recent closing price when opening on a quote.\119\ Under 
24X's proposal, five minutes after the start of the 24X Market Session, 
the Reference Price would be required to be updated every 30 seconds to 
reflect the average price of the security over the last preceding five 
minute period of the 24X Market Session, but only if the new Reference 
Price would be at least 1% above or below the existing Reference 
Price.\120\ 24X also proposes to include certain price bands during the 
24X Market Session (``24X Price Band(s)''). Under the proposal, the 24X 
Price Bands are calculated for a given security by multiplying the 
Reference Price by an applicable Percentage Parameter, which is then 
added to the Reference Price to calculate the Upper 24X Price Band and

[[Page 54743]]

subtracted from the Reference Price to calculate the Lower 24X Price 
Band.\121\ If an order entered during the 24X Market Session falls 
outside of the 24X Price Bands, 24X proposes to identify three distinct 
Members that have at least 100 shares in the relevant security priced 
at the applicable end of the 24X Price Bands and consult with these 
Members as to whether the 24X Price Bands should be adjusted.\122\ In 
the event that 24X is unable to find such Members, or 24X and the 
Members determine that the 24X Price Bands should not change, the order 
that triggered the review will be represented at the Upper 24X Price 
Band or Lower 24X Price Band, as appropriate.\123\ One commenter 
expressed concern with the proposed 24X volatility monitors, stating 
that it is not clear how well the mechanism would work, especially 
during periods of extreme market volatility or material newsworthy 
events.\124\ Commenters also raised concerns about how 24X would 
implement regulatory trading halts and pauses.\125\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \117\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85623 (April 11, 
2019), 84 FR 16086 (April 17, 2019) (Order Approving the Eighteenth 
Amendment to the National Market System Plan to Address 
Extraordinary Market Volatility).
    \118\ Proposed 24X Rule 11.15(e)(2).
    \119\ Proposed 24X Rules 11.14(c)(3) and 11.15(f).
    \120\ Id.
    \121\ Proposed 24X Rule 11.15(f).
    \122\ Id.
    \123\ Id.
    \124\ See Blue Ocean Letter at 4. The commenter also stated that 
24X's proposal is silent on the actual mechanics for initiating and 
ending trading halts and does not explain how clearance and 
settlement of trades made before or during a halt would occur. See 
id. Further, the commenter states that no explanation is given as to 
how corporate actions would be treated. See id., at 5.
    \125\ See Blue Ocean Letter at 4 and Nasdaq Letter at 4 (``the 
Application does not sufficiently explain how 24X will coordinate 
with primary listing exchanges to implement regulatory trading halts 
and pauses during the entirety of the 24X Trading Session'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    24X's proposal to provide for continuous trading on an exchange 
outside of regular trading hours raises a number of issues, many of 
which have been considered previously in the context of pre-market and 
post-market trading sessions. In particular, these include the need for 
heightened disclosures and consolidated last sale and quotation 
information in the after-hours market, as well as the associated 
increased trading risks of after-hours trading, including, among other 
things, greater price volatility, reduced liquidity, wider spreads, and 
fewer investor protections, have been raised before.\126\ As other 
exchanges have proposed expanded trading hours to include pre-market 
and post-market sessions, the Commission has approved such expansion 
where certain safeguards were implemented to mitigate these 
concerns.\127\ Such safeguards include, among other things, specific 
disclosures to investors of heightened risks of after-hours 
trading,\128\ establishing risk and volatility moderators and a 
corresponding expansion of the operational hours of the SIPs,\129\ to 
help ensure the availability of consolidated last sale and quotation 
information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \126\ See, e.g., Special Study: Electronic Communication 
Networks and Afterhours Trading, Division of Market Regulation, 
Commission (June 2000), https://www.sec.gov/news/studies/ecnafter.htm; Investor Bulletin: After-Hours Trading, Office of 
Investor Education and Advocacy, Commission (May 2011), https://www.sec.gov/files/afterhourtrading.pdf; and Investor Publications, 
Commission, After-Hours Trading: Understanding the Risks (Nov. 8, 
2008), https://www.sec.gov/reportspubs/investor-publications/investorpubsafterhourshtm.html. Investor Bulletin: Extended Hours 
Trading (June 6, 2022) Extended-Hours Trading: Investor Bulletin 
[verbar] Ivestor.gov. Staff reports, Investor Bulletins, and other 
staff documents (including those cited herein) represent the views 
of Commission staff and are not a rule, regulation, or statement of 
the Commission. The Commission has neither approved nor disapproved 
the content of these documents and, like all staff statements, they 
have no legal force or effect, do not alter or amend applicable law, 
and create no new or additional obligations for any person. The 
Commission has expressed no view regarding the analysis, findings, 
or conclusions contained herein.
    \127\ See, e.g., Securities and Exchange Act Nos. 77607 (April 
13, 2016) 81 FR 23032 (April 19, 2016) (Order Approving Proposed 
Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1 Thereto, To Adopt an 
Early Trading Session and Three New Time-In-Force Instructions), at 
23034; 42003 (October 13, 1999) 64 FR 56554 (October 20, 1999) 
(Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of 
Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 by National Association of 
Securities Dealers, Inc. Relating to the Extension of Certain Nasdaq 
Services and Facilities Until 6:30 p.m. Eastern Time); 42004 
(October 13, 1999) 64 FR 56548 (October 20,1999) (Notice of Filing 
of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 and Order 
Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rules Change and Amendment 
Nos. 1 and 2 by the Chicago Stock Exchange Relating to the 
Implementation of an Extended Hours Trading Session).
    \128\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 2265, Investors Exchange Rule 3.290, 
Nasdaq Section 20.
    \129\ The SIPs, which collect, consolidate and disseminate 
consolidated data, including the NBBO, in the equity market are 
currently governed by (1) the Consolidated Tape Association Plan 
(``CTA Plan''), (2) the Consolidated Quotation Plan (``CQ Plan''), 
and (3) the Joint Self-Regulatory Organization Plan Governing the 
Collection, Consolidation, and Dissemination of Quotation and 
Transaction Information for Nasdaq-Listed Securities Traded on 
Exchanges on an Unlisted Trading Privileges Basis (``UTP Plan'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is considering whether the 24X proposal to operate 
as an exchange that permits continuous trading is consistent with 
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, which requires, among other things, that 
the rules of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices, promote just and equitable principles 
of trade, foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in 
regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, 
and facilitating transactions in securities, remove impediments to and 
perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market 
system, and in general protect investors and the public interest, 
particularly given the lack of transparency during the 24X Market 
Session. Specifically, the SIPs currently do not operate during the 
hours the 24X Market Session is proposed to occur and therefore 
quotation and last sale information, including the calculation of an 
NBBO, would not be available during the 24X Market Session. The 
Commission is evaluating whether the absence of consolidated market 
information during the 24X Market Session is consistent with Section 
6(b)(5) of the Act.\130\ The Commission is considering whether 24X's 
proposed investor disclosures,\131\ which mirror those made available 
by other exchanges,\132\ are sufficient to highlight the what appear to 
be unique risks associated with continuous trading during the 24X 
Market Session. Specifically, the Commission is evaluating whether 
these disclosures, currently used for exchange pre-market and post-
market trading sessions, sufficiently inform investors of the greater 
potential risks associated with the significantly expanded after-hours 
trading that 24X proposes for its 24X Market Session.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \130\ One commenter states that 24X has not sufficiently 
analyzed how the Exchange would comply with certain Commission rules 
and interact with other exchanges when the SIPs are not operating. 
See Nasdaq Letter at 2. The commenter ``encouraged'' the Commission 
to consider the potential risks resulting from the absence of a 
real-time NBBO. See id. Further, the commenter states that the 24X 
proposal would not allow for technical changes that typically take 
place during pauses in the trading day. See id., at 3.
    \131\ Proposed 24X Rule 3.21.
    \132\ See supra note 128.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Next, the Commission is considering whether the rules proposed by 
24X to address certain risks associated with trading during the 24X 
Market Session are consistent with the Act. First, certain mechanisms 
that address volatility in individual symbols and the equities market 
as a whole are not available during the after-hours sessions.\133\ The 
Commission is considering whether the 24X proposed risk and volatility 
moderators are consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act. Second, 24X 
proposes to impose on its members certain requirements governing risk 
management controls and supervisory procedures \134\ that are

[[Page 54744]]

similar to requirements imposed by other exchanges.\135\ The Commission 
is evaluating whether such proposed risk management controls and 
supervisory procedures, which appear to be based on requirements that 
were established for the current trading hours and environment are 
sufficient during the 24X Market Session or whether additional 
mechanisms would be needed. The Commission is also considering how the 
relevant clearing agencies for equities, the National Securities 
Clearing Corporation (``NSCC'') and the Depository Trust Company, would 
address any potential credit, market, and liquidity risks associated 
with trades submitted by the Exchange when the markets, banks, Fedwire, 
and any providers of settlement services are closed for business.\136\ 
The Commission is considering whether the 24X proposal would permit 
risk to be managed in a manner consistent with the requirements of 
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act that an exchange's rules be designed to 
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, promote just 
and equitable principles of trade, foster cooperation and coordination 
with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing 
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in 
securities, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a free 
and open market and a national market system, and, in general protect 
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \133\ Specifically, Limit Up--Limit Down trading pauses and 
market wide circuit breakers are unavailable during after-hours 
trading.
    \134\ See Proposed 24X Rule 11.10(g). The Market Access Rule, 
Rule 15c3-5, referred to in proposed 24X Rule 11.10(g), requires 
broker-dealers with market access to, among other things, establish, 
document, and maintain a system of risk management controls and 
supervisory procedures reasonably designed to manage financial, 
regulatory, and other risks of this business activity. 17 CFR 
240.15c3-5.
    \135\ See, e.g., Cboe Rule 5.36(f); CboeEDGX Rules 21.9(f); 
Nasdaq Rule 4757(b); Nasdaq BX Rule 4758(c); MEMX Rule 11.11(g).
    \136\ Three commenters raised concerns relating to 24X's ability 
to clear and settle trades after-hours. See Nasdaq Letter at 3 
(stating that US equities clearance and settlement does not operate 
on a 24/7 basis); NYSE Letter at 2-4 (stating that 24X does not 
describe any procedures or process for NSCC to clear trades during 
the 24X market session); and Blue Ocean Letter at 4 (stating that 
24X has not addressed the daily settlement of trades with NSCC when 
NSCC and its constituent members are typically closed). One 
commenter also questioned whether 24X would be able to clear trades 
on a continuous net settlement system as proposed under its Rule 
11.2 because NSCC is not open for business on weekends. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, the Commission is considering other issues raised by 
commenters about 24X's proposal to substantially extend exchange 
trading hours. Commenters raise concerns about whether 24X's proposal 
is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act that 
an exchange's rules be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative 
acts and practices, promote just and equitable principles of trade, 
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, 
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and 
facilitating transactions in securities, remove impediments to and 
perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market 
system, and, in general protect investors and the public interest. 
Specifically, commenters raised concerns about the effect of 24X's 
proposal on market-wide surveillance.\137\ These commenters stated that 
the 24X proposal does not sufficiently detail how 24X will coordinate 
with primary listing exchanges to surveil securities during the 24X 
Market Session or how market surveillance will work generally.\138\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \137\ See Nasdaq Letter at 4-5. See also Blue Ocean Letter at 5-
6.
    \138\ See id. One commenter states that 24X's proposal would be 
the first occurrence of a national securities exchange that utilizes 
unlisted trading privileges to operate outside the trading hours of 
the primary listing exchange. See Nasdaq Letter at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, commenters stated that 24X has not sufficiently 
explained how 24X will comply with relevant Commission rules in light 
of 24X's novel features.\139\ Specifically, one commenter states that 
the 24X proposal does not explain how 24X intends to comply with 
Regulation NMS Rules 602, 603, 610 and 611 and Regulation SHO 
generally.\140\ The commenter also stated that the 24X's proposed 
routing relationship with Instinet is not adequately described, 
especially in light of the 24X Market session when other exchanges are 
closed.\141\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \139\ See Nasdaq Letter at 3. See also Blue Ocean Letter at 3 
and 5.
    \140\ See Blue Ocean Letter at 3 and 5.
    \141\ See Blue Ocean Letter at 3 (stating that it is 
``critical'' for the Commission and other market participants to be 
able to understand and evaluate how routing of orders will be 
administered when other markets are closed).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A commenter stated that listed companies often release material 
information outside of core market hours and that primary listing 
exchanges typically require companies to notify their primary listing 
exchanges prior to the release of such information to allow the 
exchange to determine whether a trading halt is necessary.\142\ The 
commenter suggested the Commission consider the effect the 24X Market 
Session would have on the disclosure of material information and the 
volatility in securities outside of core hours trading hours when 
material information is released.\143\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \142\ See Nasdaq Letter at 4.
    \143\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A commenter stated that the 24X proposal does not address how 24X 
will handle the elimination of natural trading pauses when corporate 
actions, such as stock splits, dividends, mergers and SPAC combinations 
typically occur at the end of the trading day.\144\ The commenter also 
stated that the 24X proposal does not adequately explain how 24X will 
pause trading to allow for critical exchange, industry, and systems 
tests that are typically performed when the exchange is not 
operating.\145\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \144\ See id. Specifically, the commenter referenced corporate 
actions including stock splits, dividends, and mergers that 
typically take effect at the end of the trading day.
    \145\ See id. Specifically, the commenter references tests such 
as general customer testing, disaster recovery tests, industry-wide 
business continuity tests.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Fractional Shares
    24X proposes to permit orders to be submitted in round lots, mixed 
lots or odd-lots. Orders are proposed to be submitted in as small as 1/
1,000th of a share.\146\ 24X's proposal does not describe how trading 
in fractional shares would occur. Trading in fractional shares on an 
exchange raises issues relating to trade reporting,\147\ custody, 
clearance \148\ and settlement, and quote display. The Commission is 
considering whether 24X's proposal to accept orders and offer trading 
in fractional shares in units as small as 1/1,000th of a share is 
designed to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in 
regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, 
and facilitating transactions in securities, remove impediments to and 
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market 
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest, 
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \146\ See supra note 101.
    \147\ See Nasdaq Letter at 3. (``the SIPs do not currently allow 
for the reporting of fractional shares'').
    \148\ See Nasdaq Letter at 3 and NYSE Letter at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Three commenters raised concerns over 24X's proposal to allow for 
trading in fractional shares. Three commenters stated that 24X's 
proposal does not sufficiently explain how trading in fractional shares 
would function.\149\ One commenter stated that it is unclear from 24X's 
proposal how trading in fractional shares will comply with certain 
relevant

[[Page 54745]]

Commission rules.\150\ Two commenters also stated that the 24X proposal 
has not adequately described how fractional share trading would operate 
in connection with the SIPs,\151\ or how fractional shares would clear, 
settle, and route to other markets that do not allow fractional share 
trading.\152\ One commenter stated that because 24X's proposed rules 
require all transactions to be cleared using a continuous net 
settlement system, and because NSCC is not available for either after-
hours trading or trading in fractional shares, 24X will not be able to 
provide after-hours trading and trading in fractional shares while also 
complying with its own rules regarding clearing and settlement.\153\ 
Therefore, the commenter states that if 24X were approved as a national 
securities exchange, it would immediately be in violation of Section 
19(g) of the Act.\154\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \149\ See Blue Ocean Letter at 3. See also NYSE Letter at 2 and 
Nasdaq Letter at 3. The commenters state that important information 
including minimum trade size and how fractional trading would 
interact with other Exchanges is not addressed.
    \150\ See Nasdaq Letter at 3. The commenter specifically states 
that 24X has not explained how fractional share trading is 
consistent with Rules 602, 603, 610, and 611 of Regulation NMS.
    \151\ See id. The commenter stated that 24X has not analyzed the 
potential costs of technical enhancements to the exclusive SIPs. See 
also NYSE Letter at 2-4 (stating that 24X is silent on whether it 
intends to report to the SIP in fractional quantities or if it would 
round to a whole share. Further, the commenter states that certain 
studies have found that rounding up fractional shares to a whole can 
distort reported market volumes).
    \152\ See Nasdaq Letter at 3.
    \153\ See NYSE Letter at 2-3.
    \154\ Id. This commenter also states that it is unclear how 
fractional share quotations would be incorporated into any potential 
odd-lot quotation reporting, should odd-lot quotations reporting be 
expanded in the future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Sufficiency of Exhibits--Regulatory Funding

1. Exhibit I
    To help ensure that 24X has and would continue to have adequate 
funding to be able to meet its responsibilities under the Act, 24X 
represents that, if the Commission approves 24X's application for 
registration as a national securities exchange, US Holdings, as the 
controlling owner of the membership interests in the Exchange, would 
allocate sufficient assets to 24X to enable 24X's operation.\155\ 
Specifically, 24X represents that the US Holdings will make a cash 
contribution to 24X of $5,000,000, ``in addition to any previously-
provided in-kind contributions, such as legal, regulatory, and 
infrastructure-related services.'' \156\ 24X also represents that such 
cash and in-kind contributions from the US Holdings will be adequate to 
operate 24X, including the regulation of the Exchange, and that 24X and 
the US Holdings have entered into an agreement that requires the US 
Holdings to provide adequate funding for the Exchange's operations, 
including the regulation of the Exchange.\157\ 24X represents this 
agreement provides that (1) the Exchange shall receive all fees, 
including regulatory fees and trading fees, payable by the Exchange's 
members, as well as any funds received from any applicable market data 
fees and tape revenue, and (2) US Holdings will provide the Exchange 
with cash, cash equivalents, securities or other sufficiently liquid 
instruments sufficient to help ensure that the Exchange's financial 
resources (calculated as assets in excess of liabilities) remain 
greater than $5 million.\158\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \155\ See Exhibit I of 24X's Form 1.
    \156\ Id.
    \157\ Id.
    \158\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, any revenues received by the Exchange from fees derived 
from its regulatory function or regulatory fines will not be used for 
non-regulatory purposes or distributed to the US Holdings, but rather, 
shall be applied to fund the legal and regulatory operations of the 
Exchange (including surveillance and enforcement activities), or, as 
the case may be, shall be used to pay restitution and disgorgement of 
funds intended for customers (except in the event of liquidation of the 
Exchange, which case US Holdings will be entitled to the distribution 
of the remaining assets of the Exchange).\159\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \159\ See Proposed 24X Rule 15.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is considering whether 24X has satisfied the 
requirements to file certain exhibits included in 24X's Form 1. In its 
Form 1 application, 24X states that it is not filing audited financial 
statements for itself as the applicant, as required under Exhibit I, 
because ``24X National Exchange LLC has been formed but has not 
commenced operations and does not yet have audited financial statements 
for any fiscal year.'' \160\ Further, in the Exhibit I, 24X represents 
that US Holdings ``shall make prior to the launch of the Exchange, 
through its U.S. bank account, a cash contribution to the Exchange of 
$5 million, in addition to any previously provided in-kind 
contributions, such as legal, regulatory, and infrastructure-related 
services.'' \161\ However, as discussed further below, 24X has not 
explained or otherwise shown how the financial statements filed for the 
US Holdings under Exhibit D reflect that US Holdings has or will have 
sufficient funds to provide 24X with such cash contributions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \160\ See Exhibit I of 24X's Form 1.
    \161\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Exhibit D
    Exhibit D requires that the applicant file unconsolidated financial 
statements for each subsidiary or affiliate for the latest fiscal year. 
Such financial statements must include a balance sheet and income 
statement ``with such footnotes and other disclosures as are necessary 
to avoid rendering the financial statements misleading.'' In the US 
Holdings balance sheet filed under Exhibit D, total assets are reported 
as negative $439.\162\ It is unclear as to what this number signifies, 
as assets generally cannot be below $0. Further, this negative $439 is 
not reflected in the financial statements of other subsidiaries. The 
financial statements filed by 24X do not include accompanying footnotes 
or disclosures that explain these discrepancies. Moreover, while in 
Exhibit I 24X states that US Holdings ``shall make prior to the launch 
of the Exchange, through its U.S. bank account, a cash contribution to 
the Exchange of $5 million, in addition to any previously provided in-
kind contributions, such as legal, regulatory, and infrastructure-
related services,'' \163\ the Commission is considering whether the 
financial statements filed for US Holdings under Exhibit D show US 
Holdings has the financial resources to make a $5 million U.S. Dollar 
cash infusion, as 24X states, such that the Exchange would be organized 
and have the capacity to carry out the purposes of the Act, including 
the ability to enforce compliance by its members, and persons 
associated with its members, with the federal securities laws and rules 
thereunder and the rules of the exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \162\ See Exhibit D of 24X's Form 1.
    \163\ See Exhibit I of 24X's Form 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Commission is considering whether the financial 
statements for the US Holdings filed under Exhibit D for the Form 1 
show that US Holdings would be able to provide the financial support 
that 24X describes in its Form 1. In its Form 1 application, 24X states 
that it is not filing audited financial statements for itself as 
applicant, as required under Exhibit I, because ``24X National Exchange 
LLC has been formed but has not commenced operations and does not yet 
have audited financial statements for any fiscal year.'' \164\ 
Moreover, 24X further states that, ``[i]f the Commission approves the 
Exchange's Form 1 Application for Registration as a national securities 
exchange, 24X US

[[Page 54746]]

Holdings LLC (``Parent''), as the controlling owner of the membership 
interests in the Exchange, will allocate sufficient assets to the 
Exchange to enable its operation.'' \165\ Given the applicant's stated 
reliance on US Holdings for sufficient financial support to enable its 
operation, the Commission is considering whether the unaudited 
financial statements filed for the applicant's parent, US Holdings, 
show that the Exchange would be organized and have the capacity to 
carry out the purposes of the Act, including the ability to enforce 
compliance by its members, and persons associated with its members, 
with the federal securities laws and rules thereunder and the rules of 
the exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \164\ Id.
    \165\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

D. Location of Exchange Trading Platform

    24X proposes to locate its primary trading platform in the Equinix 
data center located in New York (``NY4''). 24X also proposes to locate 
a ``mirrored'' primary platform in London (``LD4'').\166\ 24X did not 
describe how the LD4 platform would operate along with the platform in 
NY4. The Commission is considering whether the proposal is consistent 
with the requirements under Section 6(b)(1) of the Act, which among 
other things, requires the exchange to be so organized and have the 
capacity to be able to carry out the purposes of the Act and to comply, 
and to enforce compliance by its members and persons associated with 
its members, with provisions of the Act. The Commission also is 
considering whether the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of 
the Act, which requires the rules of the exchange to prevent fraudulent 
and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable 
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with 
persons engaged with regulating, clearing, settling, processing, 
information with respect to and facilitating transactions in 
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a 
free and open market and a national market system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \166\ See Exhibit E-1 of 24X's Form 1 at 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    One commenter expressed concern over this aspect of 24X's 
proposal.\167\ The commenter stated that no other U.S. exchange 
operates a mirrored primary U.S. trading platform outside of the United 
States and stated that 24X does not explain this structure in its 
proposal.\168\ Further, the commenter stated that the Commission should 
consider the proposed structure's jurisdictional and operational 
implications and whether such a structure ``would open the door to 
foreign markets to operate mirrored markets within the United States.'' 
\169\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \167\ See Nasdaq Letter at 4.
    \168\ Id.
    \169\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Request for Written Comment

    The Commission requests that interested persons provide written 
views and data with respect to 24X's Form 1 and the questions included 
above or other relevant issues. Comments may be submitted by any of the 
following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number 10-239 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number 10-239. This file number 
should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the 
Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please 
use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the 
Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/other.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to 24X's Form 1 filed with the Commission, and 
all written communications relating to the application between the 
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from 
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 
available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official 
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make publicly available. All 
submissions should refer to File Number 10-239 and should be submitted 
on or before September 28, 2022.

    By the Commission.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-19264 Filed 9-6-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P