Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0030-0274
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2005-10-25T04:00Z

Karl
Simon/
DC/
USEPA/
US
EPA­
OAR,
OTAQ,
OD
Sent
by:
Karl
Simon
Received
Date:

09/
02/
2005
11:
26
AM
Transmission
Date:

09/
02/
2005
11:
26:
50
AM
To
Bryan
Manning,
scoville.
pat@
epa.
gov
cc
zinger.
don@
epa.
gov
Subject
Fw:
OMB
review
of
EPA
Aircraft
Emissions
rule.

please
make
the
changes
and
start
the
package
moving
­
thanks.

­­­­­
Forwarded
by
Karl
Simon/
DC/
USEPA/
US
on
09/
02/
2005
11:
21
AM
­­­­­

"
Rostker,
David"
<
David_
Rostker@
omb.
eop.
go
v>

09/
02/
2005
11:
16
AM
To
Karl
Simon/
DC/
USEPA/
US@
EPA
cc
Subject
FW:
OMB
review
of
EPA
Aircraft
Emissions
rule.

FAA
has
concurs
with
the
following
editorial
comments.
Please
let
me
know
if
you
accept
these
changes.

David
Rostker
OMB/
OIRA
drostker@
omb.
eop.
gov
­­­­­
Original
Message­­­­­
From:
Camille.
Mittelholtz@
dot.
gov
[
mailto:
Camille.
Mittelholtz@
dot.
gov]
Sent:
Friday,
September
02,
2005
10:
57
AM
To:
Rostker,
David
Cc:
Curtis.
Holsclaw@
faa.
gov;
Carl.
Burleson@
faa.
gov;
warren.
gillette@
faa.
gov;
Edward.
McQueen@
faa.
gov;
Joanne.
Petrie@
dot.
gov;
Linda.
Lawson@
dot.
gov
Subject:
RE:
OMB
review
of
EPA
Aircraft
Emissions
rule.

DOT
concurs,
with
comment.
Please
see
comments
below.

­­­­­
Original
Message­­­­­
From:
warren.
gillette@
faa.
gov
[
mailto:
warren.
gillette@
faa.
gov]
Sent:
Wednesday,
August
31,
2005
10:
25
AM
To:
Mittelholtz,
Camille
<
OST>
Cc:
Curtis.
Holsclaw@
faa.
gov;
Carl.
Burleson@
faa.
gov;
Edward.
McQueen@
faa.
gov
Subject:
OMB
review
of
EPA
Aircraft
Emissions
rule.

Camille:

We
have
reviewed
the
EPA
Aircraft
Emissions
rule
and
concur
subject
to
the
following
two
comments:

In
the
attached,
pdf
file
of
the
document:

Page
44
and
45:
For
each
of
the
equations
that
end
with
"
g/
KN(
rated
output)."
the
parenthesis
should
be
removed
from
the
words
"
rated
output"
(
but
only
when
it
occurs
at
the
end
of
each
equation).
There
are
a
total
of
five
instances
where
this
applies
in
a)
i),
a)
ii),
b)
i),
b)
ii),
and
c).

We
noticed
that,
in
electronic
conversions
of
the
document
from
WordPerfect
to
MS
Word,
the
multiplication
sign
on
page
45
in
equation
b)
ii)
and
that
found
on
page
97
in
equation
A)
2)
changed
into
an
upper
case
H.
EPA
should
follow
this
up
to
ensure
that
the
same
thing
doesn't
happen
when
the
file
goes
to
the
Federal
Register
for
final
publication.

Should
you
have
any
questions,
please
reply
or
give
me
a
call.

(
See
attached
file:
050818
EPA
CAEP4
NOx
Rule.
pdf)

Thank
you.

Warren
Gillette
FAA
Office
of
Environment
and
Energy
202
267
8367