Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0295-0010
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2010-06-08T04:00Z

From:	Suchecki, Joe [JSuchecki@ngelaw.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, April 07, 2010 9:14 AM
To:	Tanya Parise
Subject:	RE: Stationary CI Engines 10-30 l/cyl

Hi Tanya,
 
Finally heard back from my members on this issue.  We are still good with the 8 
engines per year.  We would also say that the majority would be emergency engines  - 
so lets call it 5 emergency and 3 prime.
 
Also, I received a question on the CI NSPS form New York State - could you direct me 
to the document in the docket that indicates that it is not cost effective to require DPFs 
and SCR on emergency diesel engines?  Hopefully, you know exactly where to find it. 
- there's only a couple thousand documents to search through at Reg.gov.
 
Thanks.
 
Joe
 
Joe Suchecki 
Director, Public Affairs 
Engine Manufacturers Association 
Two North LaSalle Street, Suite 1700
Chicago, IL 60602
Tel:  312-827-8734 
Fax:  312-827-8737 
jsuchecki@emamail.org 
www.enginemanufacturers.org 
 
Confidentiality Notice:  This communication is confidential and may contain privileged information.  If you have 
received it in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and immediately delete it and any attachments without 
copying or further transmitting the same. 
 
 
All attachments are MS Office XP and are MIME encoded.  If you have any software compatibility issues, please 
contact EMA at (312) 827-8700 immediately. 
 

 

 
From: Tanya Parise [mailto:parise.tanya@ecrweb.com]  
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 1:21 PM 
To: Suchecki, Joe 
Cc: 'Tanya Parise' 
Subject: RE: Stationary CI Engines 10-30 l/cyl
Hi Joe,

I was wondering if you’ve gotten any feedback from members yet on the below questions that you 
could share with us?

Tanya

From: Tanya Parise [mailto:parise.tanya@ecrweb.com]  
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 4:30 PM 
To: 'Suchecki, Joe' 
Subject: RE: Stationary CI Engines 10-30 l/cyl

Thanks Joe.  What does EMA estimate that the split of emergency/non-emergency engines would be 
in this displacement range?
Also, do you think that 8 new engines per year is still reasonable or would it be higher or lower?   I 
believe you provided the 8 engines/yr estimate back in 2005.

Tanya

From: Suchecki, Joe [mailto:JSuchecki@ngelaw.com]  
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 1:46 PM 
To: Tanya Parise 
Subject: RE: Stationary CI Engines 10-30 l/cyl

Tanya,
 
The primary use of these large engines is in electricity production, either in remote 
areas such as Alaska or for emergency standby engines for nuclear power plants or 
other very large facilities.  One member also indicated that engines of this size are 
used to power emergency flood water pumps.
 
Joe
 
Joe Suchecki 
Director, Public Affairs 
Engine Manufacturers Association 
Two North LaSalle Street, Suite 1700
Chicago, IL 60602
Tel:  312-827-8734 
Fax:  312-827-8737 
jsuchecki@emamail.org 
www.enginemanufacturers.org 
 
Confidentiality Notice:  This communication is confidential and may contain privileged information.  If you have 
received it in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and immediately delete it and any attachments without 
copying or further transmitting the same. 
 
 
All attachments are MS Office XP and are MIME encoded.  If you have any software compatibility issues, please 
contact EMA at (312) 827-8700 immediately.
 

 
From: Tanya Parise [mailto:parise.tanya@ecrweb.com]  
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 11:16 AM 
To: Suchecki, Joe 
Subject: Stationary CI Engines 10-30 l/cyl
Hi Joe,

I’ve got a question related to stationary CI engines between 10-30 liters per cylinder.  I think EMA 
provided some information some time ago on the number of stationary CI engines in this 
displacement range that are expected to be sold per year.  EMA had estimated 8 engines per year I 
believe.  Do you know which industries use these engines and what applications these engines are 
used for?

Thanks,
Tanya