Document ID: SEC-2011-0866-0001
Agency: sec
Document Type: Notice
Title: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes: NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
Posted Date: 2011-06-22T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36606-36607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15604]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-64688; File No. SR-Phlx-2011-56]

 Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Order 
Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change Establishing a Qualified 
Contingent Cross Order for Execution on the Floor of the Exchange

June 16, 2011.

I. Introduction

    On May 4, 2011, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') 
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), 
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to 
establish a qualified contingent cross order for execution on the floor 
of the Exchange (``Floor QCC Order''). The proposed rule change was 
published in the Federal Register on May 12, 2011.\3\ The Commission 
received one comment letter on the proposal.\4\ Phlx submitted a 
comment response letter on June 3, 2011.\5\ This order grants approval 
of the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64415 (May 5, 2011), 
76 FR 27732 (``Notice'').
    \4\ See Letter to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Commission, 
from Michael J. Simon, Secretary, International Securities Exchange 
(``ISE''), dated May 27, 2011 (``ISE Letter'').
    \5\ See Letter to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Commission, 
from Jeffrey S. Davis, Vice President and Deputy General Counsel, 
Phlx, dated June 3, 2011 (``Phlx Response Letter'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposal

    Phlx proposes to amend Rule 1064 to establish a Floor QCC Order 
type.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Phlx established an electronic QCC Order set forth in PHLX 
Rule 1080(o). See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64249 (April 
7, 2011), 76 FR 20773 (April 13, 2011) (SR-Phlx-2011-047).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As proposed, the Floor QCC Order would be required to: (i) Be for 
at least 1,000 contracts, (ii) meet the six requirements of Phlx Rule 
1080(o)(3),\7\ (iii) be executed at a price at or between the National 
Best Bid and Offer (``NBBO''); and (iv) be rejected if a Customer order 
is resting on the Exchange book at the same price. Specifically, 
proposed Phlx Rule 1064(e) would provide that Floor QCC Orders may be 
immediately executed upon entry into the system by an Options Floor 
Brokers and without exposure if no Customer Orders \8\ exist on the 
Exchange's order book at the same price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Phlx Rule 1080(o)(3) defines a qualified contingent cross 
trade substantively identical to the Commission's definition in the 
QCT Release. A qualified contingent cross trade must meet the 
following conditions: (i) At least one component must be an NMS 
stock, as defined in Rule 600 of Regulation NMS, 17 CFR 242.600; 
(ii) all components must be effected with a product or price 
contingency that either has been agreed to by all the respective 
counterparties or arranged for by a broker-dealer as principal or 
agent; (iii) the execution of one component must be contingent upon 
the execution of all other components at or near the same time; (iv) 
the specific relationship between the component orders (e.g., the 
spread between the prices of the component orders) is determined by 
the time the contingent order is placed; (v) the component orders 
must bear a derivative relationship to one another, represent 
different classes of shares of the same issuer, or involve the 
securities of participants in mergers or with intentions to merge 
that have been announced or cancelled; and (vi) the transaction must 
be fully hedged (without regard to any prior existing position) as a 
result of other components of the contingent trade. The Commission 
has granted an exemption for QCTs that meet certain requirements 
from Rule 611(a) of Regulation NMS, 17 CFR 242.611(a) (``QCT 
Exemption''). See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57620 (April 
4, 2008), 73 FR 19271 (April 9, 2008) (``QCT Release,'' which 
supersedes a release initially granting the QCT exemption, 
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54389 (August 31, 2006), 71 FR 
52829 (September 7, 2006) (``Original QCT Release'')).
    \8\ Phlx would reject Floor QCC Orders that attempt to execute 
when any Customer Orders are resting on the Exchange limit order 
book at the same price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Floor QCC Orders would be electronically entered by an Options 
Floor Broker on the floor of the Exchange using the Floor Broker 
Management System (``FBMS'') and the orders would then be executed 
electronically. Only Options Floor Brokers would be permitted to enter 
Floor QCC Orders. In addition, under proposed Rule 1064(e)(2), Options 
Floor Brokers would be prohibited from entering Floor QCC Orders for 
their own accounts, the account of an associated person, or an account 
with respect to which it or an associated person thereof exercises 
investment discretion. The Exchange notes that the restrictions set 
forth in proposed Rule 1064(e)(2) do not limit in any way the 
obligation of Options Floor Brokers and other Exchange members to 
comply with Section 11(a) or the rules thereunder.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Proposed Rule 1064(e)(2) would also require Options Floor 
Brokers to maintain books and records demonstrating that no Floor 
QCC Order was entered by an Options Floor Broker in such a 
prohibited account.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, the Exchange proposes to modify subsections (a), (b), 
and (c) of Rule 1064 to establish that the requirements applicable to 
Floor QCC Orders that are set forth in new subsection (e) are distinct 
from those applicable to the orders described in such subsections.

III. Comment Letter

    One commenter raised an objection to the proposal.\10\ The 
commenter questioned the ability of a floor-based exchange to verify 
that there is not a customer order on the book at the price as a Floor 
QCC Order at the time of execution.\11\ The commenter argued that in an 
electronic trading environment, an exchange's systems can automatically 
determine if there is a customer order on the book before a Floor QCC 
Order is executed.\12\ The commenter stated that how this function 
would be performed on a floor-based exchange should be clarified, as 
well as what the time of execution would be for a floor-based 
trade.\13\ The commenter argued that ``[a]llowing a QCC to be 
implemented in a non-automated environment without a systemic check of 
whether there is a customer order on the book at the time of execution 
would effectively eliminate the protections guaranteed in an all 
electronic trading environment, thus returning [the exchanges] to the 
unequal competitive environment from which the ISE's QCC proposal 
originated.'' \14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See note 4, supra.
    \11\ See ISE Letter.
    \12\ Id.
    \13\ Id.
    \14\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In its letter, Phlx responded to the issues raised in the ISE 
Letter and explained that, even when Floor QCC Orders are entered by 
the Options Floor Broker, they are submitted electronically to the Phlx 
order book where a systemic check would be performed to determine 
whether a customer order is resting on the book at

[[Page 36607]]

the same price as any leg of the Floor QCC Order, in which case the 
Phlx trading system would reject the entire Floor QCC Order.\15\ If, 
however, there is no customer order resting on the Phlx book at the 
same price as any leg of the Floor QCC order, the system would execute 
the Floor QCC Order and simultaneously assign it an execution time.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Phlx Response Letter, supra note 5.
    \16\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Discussion and Commission's Findings

    The Commission has carefully reviewed the proposed rule change, the 
one comment letter received, and finds that it is consistent with the 
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\17\ Specifically, the 
Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with Sections 6(b)(5) 
\18\ and 6(b)(8),\19\ which require, among other things, that the rules 
of a national securities exchange be designed to promote just and 
equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, 
in general, to protect investors and the public interest and that the 
rules of an exchange do no impose any burden on competition not 
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. In 
addition, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is 
consistent with Section 11A(a)(1)(C) of the Act,\20\ in which Congress 
found that it is in the public interest and appropriate for the 
protection of investors and the maintenance of fair and orderly markets 
to assure, among other things, the economically efficient execution of 
securities transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). In approving this proposed rule change, 
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on 
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 
78c(f).
    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1(a)(1)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that the proposed rule change, which would 
permit a clean cross of the options leg of a subset of qualified 
contingent trades from the Exchange floor, is appropriate and 
consistent with the Act.\21\ The Commission believes that the Floor QCC 
Order type may facilitate the execution of qualified contingent trades, 
which the Commission found to be beneficial to the market as a whole by 
contributing to the efficient functioning of the securities markets and 
the price discovery process.\22\ The Floor QCC Order would provide 
assurance to parties to stock-option qualified contingent trades that 
their hedge would be maintained by allowing the options component to be 
executed as a clean cross.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63955 
(February 24, 2011), 76 FR 11533 (March 2, 2011) (SR-ISE-2010-73).
    \22\ See Original QCT Release, supra note 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While the Commission believes that order exposure is generally 
beneficial to options markets in that it provides an incentive to 
options market maker to provide liquidity and therefore plays an 
important role in ensuring competition and price discovery in the 
options markets, it also has recognized that contingent trades can be 
``useful trading tools for investors and other market participants, 
particularly those who trade the securities of issuers involved in 
mergers, different classes of shares of the same issuers, convertible 
securities, and equity derivatives such as options [italics added],'' 
\23\ and that ``[t]hose who engage in contingent trades can benefit the 
market as a whole by studying the relationships between prices of such 
securities and executing contingent trades when they believe such 
relationships are out of line with what they believe to be fair 
value.'' \24\ As such, the Commission stated that the transactions that 
meet the specified requirements of the QCT Exemption could be of 
benefit to the market as a whole, contributing to the efficient 
functioning of the securities markets and the price discovery 
process.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See id. at 52830-52831.
    \24\ Id.
    \25\ See QCT Release, supra note 7 at 19273.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Thus, in light of the benefits provided by both the requirement for 
exposure as well as by qualified contingent trades such as Floor QCC 
Orders, the Commission must weigh the relative merits of both for the 
options markets.\26\ The Commission believes that the proposal, in 
requiring a Floor QCC Order be: (1) Part of a qualified contingent 
trade under Regulation NMS; (2) for at least 1,000 contracts; (3) 
executed at a price at or between the NBBO; and (4) rejected if there 
is a public customer on the electronic book, strikes an appropriate 
balance for the options market in that it is narrowly drawn and 
establishes a limited exception to the general principle of exposure 
and retains the general principle of customer priority in the options 
markets. Furthermore, not only must a Floor QCC Order be part of a 
qualified contingent trade by satisfying each of the six underlying 
requirements of the QCT Exemption, the requirement that a QCC Order be 
for a minimum size of 1,000 contracts provides another limit to its use 
by ensuring only transactions of significant size may avail themselves 
of this order type.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ The Commission notes that it has previously permitted the 
crossing of two public customer orders, for which no exposure is 
required on ISE and CBOE. See CBOE Rule 6.74A.09 and ISE Rule 715(i) 
and 721.
    \27\ The Commission notes that the requirement that clean 
crosses be of a certain minimum size is not unique to the Floor QCC 
Order. See, e.g., NSX 11.12(d), which requires, among other things, 
that a Clean Cross be for at least 5,000 shares and have an 
aggregate value of at least $100,000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission notes that, under Phlx's proposal, Floor QCC Orders 
must be submitted by an Options Floor Broker electronically from on the 
floor through Phlx's FBMS. Phlx has represented that to effect Floor 
QCC Orders, members must ensure that their orders comply with Section 
11(a)(1) of the Act,\28\ which concerns proprietary trading on an 
exchange by an exchange member, and the rules thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ 15 U.S.C. 78k(a)(1). Generally, Section 11(a)(1) of the Act 
restricts any member of a national securities exchange from 
effecting any transaction on such exchange for: (i) the member's own 
account, (ii) the account of a person associated with the member, or 
(iii) an account over which the member or a person associated with 
the member exercises discretion, unless a specific exemption is 
available.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, the Commission believes that the Phlx Response Letter 
clarified the questions raised by ISE in the ISE Letter.
    For the foregoing reasons, the Commission finds that the proposed 
rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) \29\ and 6(b)(8) \30\ of 
the Act. Further, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is 
consistent with Section 11A(a)(1)(C) of the Act.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \30\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
    \31\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1(a)(1)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
Act,\32\ that the proposed rule change (SR-Phlx-2011-56) be, and it 
hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-15604 Filed 6-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P