Document ID: EPA-R09-OAR-2006-0619-0002
Agency: epa
Document Type: Rule
Title: Revisions to the Nevada State Implementation Plan, Washoe County District Health Department
Posted Date: 2007-06-18T04:00Z

[Federal Register: June 18, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 116)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 33397-33400]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18jn07-9]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2006-0619; FRL-8327-3]

 
Revisions to the Nevada State Implementation Plan, Washoe County 
District Health Department

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the 
Washoe County District Health Department (WCDHD) portion of the Nevada 
State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern opacity, 
emissions of carbon monoxide (CO) and particulate matter (PM) from wood 
stoves and fireplaces, and air emergency episode plans. We are 
approving local rules that help regulate emission sources under the 
Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).

DATES: This rule is effective on August 17, 2007 without further 
notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by July 18, 2007. If we 
receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the 
Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will 
not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2006-0619, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 

Follow the on-line instructions.
     E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
     Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San 
Francisco, CA 94105.
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket 
without change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov
, including any personal information provided, 

unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or 
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 
Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be 
clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through 
http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous 

access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or contact 
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you 
send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be automatically 
captured and included as part of the public comment. If EPA cannot read 
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for 
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
    Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available 
electronically at http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA 

Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all 
documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may 
be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted 
material), and some may not be publicly available in either location 
(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an 
appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Al Petersen, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-
4118, petersen.alfred@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and 
``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What rules did the State submit?
    B. Are there other versions of the rules?
    C. What are the purposes of the submitted rule and rule 
revisions?
II. EPA's Evaluation and Action
    A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
    B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?

[[Page 33398]]

    C. Public comment and final action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State's Submittal

A. What rules did the State submit?

    Table 1 lists the new or amended rules we are approving with the 
date that the rules were adopted by the WCDHD and were submitted by the 
Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP).

                                            Table 1.--Rules Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Agency               Rule No.            Rule title               Adopted or revised       Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WCDHD.......................      010.117  Definitions--``Pellet        02/23/06 Revised...........     05/05/06
                                            Stove''.
WCDHD.......................      040.005  Visible Air Contaminants...  02/23/06 Revised...........     05/05/06
WCDHD.......................      040.051  Wood Stove/Fireplace Insert  02/23/06 Revised...........     05/05/06
                                            Emissions.
WCDHD.......................      050.001  Emergency Episode Plan.....  03/23/06 Adopted...........     05/05/06
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On November 4, 2006, the submittal of May 5, 2006 was found by 
operation of law to meet the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51, 
appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review.

B. Are there other versions of the rules?

    We approved a version of WCDHD Rule 040.005 into the SIP on July 
27, 1972 (37 FR 15080).
    We approved a version of WCDHD Rule 050.001 into the SIP as Rules 
060.005, 060.030, 060.035, 060.040, 060.045, 060.050, 060.055, and 
060.060 on July 27, 1972 (37 FR 15080). Submitted Rule 050.001 does not 
contain provisions that substantively relate to 060.010, 060.015, 
060.020, or 060.025. Thus, those provisions would remain in the 
applicable SIP after approval of Rule 050.001. Approval of 050.001 
would supersede the other 8 rules in the 050-series that we approved in 
1972.
    There is no version of WCDHD Rules 010.117 or 040.051 in the SIP.

C. What are the purposes of the submitted rule and rule revisions?

    Section 110(a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires states to submit 
regulations that control volatile organic compounds, nitrogen oxides, 
particulate matter, sulfur oxides, and other air pollutants which harm 
human health and the environment. The rules were developed as part of 
the Washoe County District Board of Health's program to control these 
pollutants.
    The purpose of Rule 010.117 is to define ``pellet stove'' for use 
in the rules below.
    The purpose of Rule 040.005 is to limit visible emissions from 
stationary sources.
     The revised rule has a format change and two references 
added for clarity.
    The purpose of Rule 040.051 is to limit particulate matter and 
other pollutants (such as carbon monoxide) discharged into the ambient 
air from solid fuel burning devices. Rule 040.051 would be a new rule 
in the SIP but was adopted locally several years ago and revised a 
number of times since then. The general purposes of the latest revision 
by Washoe County to Rule 040.051 are to strengthen and to clarify the 
requirements of the rule. Notable elements of Rule 040.051 are as 
follows:
     The rule provides 21 definitions for clarity.
     The rule requires a PM emission standard for non-catalytic 
appliances of 7.5 grams PM per hour and a PM emission standard for 
catalytic appliances of 4.1 grams PM per hour.
     The rule requires that existing non-certified wood stoves 
must be removed or replaced with certified wood stoves or low emission 
devices upon property sale or transfer.
    Antique wood stoves could be exempted by the Control Officer on a 
case-by-case basis.
     The rule allows, if a property is undergoing renovation 
without change of ownership, the existing wood stove to be moved and 
re-installed or the same type of fireplace to be rebuilt.
     The rule prohibits visible emissions from a chimney from 
exceeding No. 2 on the Ringlemann chart (40% opacity), except for a 15-
minute startup period.
     The rule provides a list of 12 prohibited fuels for use in 
solid fuel burning devices.
     The rule allows wood less than 20% moisture to be sold for 
immediate use; wood over 20% moisture may be sold, providing a 
seasoning period to achieve 20% moisture is recommended to the buyer.
     The rule allows no more than one certified wood stove or 
fireplace per acre to be installed in new construction.
     The rule prohibits the installation of additional solid 
fuel burning devices in existing dwelling units or commercial/public 
property.
     The rule provides various administrative requirements in 
order to enforce the standards in the rule, including qualifications 
and duties of a Wood Stove Inspector.
    The purpose of Rule 050.001 is to prevent the excessive buildup of 
air pollutants by recognizing atmospheric conditions conducive to such 
buildup and initiating effective remedial actions before the 
concentrations can build to unhealthy levels. Notable changes relative 
to the existing SIP include:
     The rule includes new definitions that clarify the meaning 
of the rule's provisions.
     The rule includes substantially more protective episode 
criteria levels for carbon monoxide (CO) and ozone compared to the 
existing SIP and includes episode criteria levels for two pollutants, 
PM10 and PM2.5, that are not included in the 
corresponding provision in the existing SIP.
     The rule no longer includes episode criteria level for 
sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and hydrocarbons.
     The rule updates the list of entities to be notified in 
the event of an alert.
     The rule includes additional control actions to be taken 
upon declaration of different stages (such as the suspension of 
operation of any solid fuel burning device upon the declaration of a 
stage 1 alert for CO, PM10 or PM2.5).
    EPA's technical support documents (TSDs) have more information 
about these rules.

II. EPA's Evaluation and Action

A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?

    Generally, SIP rules must be enforceable (see section 110(a) of the 
CAA) and must not relax existing requirements (see sections 110(l) and 
193). The WCDHD regulates a serious PM-10 nonattainment area where 
significant sources of PM-10 must fulfill the requirements of Best 
Available Control Measures (BACM), including Best Available Control 
Technology (BACT) (see section 189(b)). Rule 040.005 regulates 
significant source categories and must fulfill the requirements of 
BACM/BACT. Rule 040.051 regulates a significant source category of PM-
10 according to the Revisions to the PM-10 State Implementation Plan 
for the Truckee Meadows Air Basin (August 2002) (2002

[[Page 33399]]

Plan) and must fulfill the requirements of BACM/BACT.
    Guidance and policy documents that we used to help evaluate 
specific enforceability and BACM/BACT requirements consistently include 
the following:
     Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of 
Implementation Plans, U.S. EPA, 40 CFR part 51.
     PM-10 Guideline Document (EPA-452/R-93-008).
     Technical Information Document for Residential Wood 
Combustion Best Available Control Measures (EPA-450/2-92-002).
     Minimum BACM/RACM Control Measures for Residential Wood 
Combustion Rules, EPA Region IX (March 22, 2007).

B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?

    We believe the rules are consistent with the relevant EPA rules, 
policy, and guidance regarding enforceability, SIP relaxations, BACM/
BACT, and emergency episode plans. Specifically, we find amended WCDHD 
Rule 040.005 to be acceptable because it meets BACM, is relied upon in 
both the PM-10 and CO plans for Truckee Meadows, and is reasonably 
enforceable. We find the amended emergency episode plan recodified as 
WCDHD Rule 050.001 to be acceptable because it meets the applicable 
requirements for such plans in 40 CFR part 52, subpart H, is an 
improvement over the related existing SIP, and is relied upon by the 
PM-10 and CO plans for Truckee Meadows.
    The TSDs have more information on our evaluation.

C. Public comment and final action

    As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the CAA, EPA is fully 
approving the submitted WCDHD Rules 010.117, 040.005, 040.051, and 
050.001 because we believe they fulfill all relevant requirements. We 
do not think anyone will object to this approval, so we are finalizing 
it without proposing it in advance. However, in the Proposed Rules 
section of this Federal Register, we are simultaneously proposing 
approval of the same submitted rules. If we receive adverse comments by 
July 18, 2007, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal 
Register to notify the public that the direct final approval will not 
take effect and we will address the comments in a subsequent final 
action based on the proposal. If we do not receive timely adverse 
comments, the direct final approval will be effective without further 
notice on August 17, 2007. This will incorporate these rules into the 
federally enforceable SIP.
    Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, 
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed 
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions 
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this 
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not 
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this 
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, 
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action 
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes 
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. 
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because 
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does 
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by 
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
    This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will 
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on 
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism 
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the 
States, on the relationship between the national government and the 
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule 
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or 
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean 
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it approves a state rule 
implementing a Federal standard.
    In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In 
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the 
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority 
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be 
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP 
submission; to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise 
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements 
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not 
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as 
added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 
1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency 
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy 
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller 
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this 
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House 
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States 
prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule 
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
section 804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 17, 2007. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings 
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate

[[Page 33400]]

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: May 9, 2007.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

0
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart DD--Nevada

0
2. Section 52.1470 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(63) to read as 
follows:

Sec.  52.1470  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (63) New or amended regulations were submitted on May 5, 2006, by 
the Governor's designee.
    (i) Incorporation by reference.
    (A) Washoe County District Health Department.
    (1) Rules 010.117, 040.005, and 040.051, revised on February 23, 
2006, and Rule 050.001, adopted on March 23, 2006.

 [FR Doc. E7-11578 Filed 6-15-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P