Document ID: SEC-2020-1718-0001
Agency: sec
Document Type: Notice
Title: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes: Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc.
Posted Date: 2020-10-27T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 27, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68099-68103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-23685]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-90241; File No. SR-C2-2020-016]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc.; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Enhance 
its Drill-Through Protections and Make Other Clarifying Changes

October 21, 2020.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on October 9, 2020, Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'' or ``C2'') 
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the 
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items 
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this 
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested 
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``C2'') proposes to 
enhance its drill-through protections and make other clarifying 
changes. The text of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the 
Exchange's website (http://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/ctwo/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at 
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to enhance its drill-through protections for 
simple and complex orders and make other clarifying changes. Currently, 
pursuant to Rule 6.14(a)(4) and (b)(6), the System will execute a 
marketable buy (sell) order or complex order,\3\ respectively, up to a 
buffer amount above (below) the limit of the Opening Collar or the 
national best offer (``NBO'') (national best bid (``NBB'')), as 
applicable, or the synthetic national best offer (``SNBO'') or 
synthetic national best bid (``SNBB''), respectively (the ``drill-
through price''). The System enters any order (or unexecuted portion), 
simple \4\ or complex, into the book or the complex order book 
(``COB''), respectively, at the drill-through price for a specified 
period of time (determined by the Exchange).\5\ At the end of the time 
period, the System cancels any portion of the order not executed during 
that time period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The System may also initiate a complex order auction 
(``COA'') at the drill-through price for a complex order that would 
otherwise initiate a COA.
    \4\ Market orders or limit orders (or unexecuted portions) with 
times-in-force of immediate-or-cancel (``IOC'') or fill-or-kill 
(``FOK'') are cancelled rather than be entered into the book. Limit 
orders with times-in-force of day, good-til-cancelled (``GTC''), or 
good-til-day (``GTD) may enter the book.
    \5\ The current time period is two seconds, and the current 
default amounts are available in the technical specifications 
available at https://cdn.cboe.com/resources/membership/US_Options_BOE_Specification.pdf. Upon implementation of the 
proposed rule change, the Exchange will likely reduce the length of 
the time period and maintain the same buffer amounts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to permit orders to rest in the book or COB, 
as applicable, for multiple time periods and at more aggressive 
displayed prices during each time period.\6\ Specifically, for a limit 
order (or unexecuted portion) with a Time-in-Force of Day, GTC, or GTD, 
or a complex order, the System enters the order in the Book or COB with 
a displayed \7\ price equal to the drill-through price (as discussed 
below, if an order's limit price is less aggressive than the drill-
through price, the order will rest in the Book or COB, as applicable, 
at its limit price and subject to the User's instructions, and the 
drill-through mechanism as proposed to be amended would no longer apply 
to the order).\8\ The order (or unexecuted portion) will rest in the 
book or COB, as applicable, until the earlier to occur of the order's 
full execution or the end of the duration of the number of time 
periods.\9\ Following the end of each period prior to the final period, 
the System adds (if a buy order) or subtracts (if a sell order) one 
buffer amount to the drill-through price displayed during the 
immediately preceding period (each new price becomes the ``drill-
through price'').\10\ The order (or unexecuted

[[Page 68100]]

portion) rests in the book or COB, as applicable, at that new drill-
through price for the duration of the subsequent period. Following the 
end of the final period, the System cancels the simple or complex order 
(or unexecuted portion) not executed during any time period.\11\ The 
Exchange has received feedback from Users that the current application 
of the drill-through mechanism is too limited. The Exchange believes 
this proposed rule change will provide additional execution 
opportunities for these orders (or unexecuted portions) while providing 
protection against execution at prices that may be erroneous.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Exchange will announce to Trading Permit Holders the 
buffer amount, the number of time periods, and the length of the 
time periods in accordance with Rule 1.2. The Exchange notes that 
each time period will be the same length (as designated by the 
Exchange), and the buffer amount applied for each time period will 
be the same.
    \7\ Currently, the drill-through price is the price of orders 
and complex orders in the book or COB, respectively. The proposed 
rule change clarifies that the drill-through price is displayed, 
which is consistent with current functionality.
    \8\ See proposed Rule 6.14(a)(4)(C) and (b)(6)(B).
    \9\ The Exchange will determine on a class-by-class basis the 
number of time periods, which may not exceed five, and the length of 
the time period, which may not exceed three seconds. See proposed 
Rule 6.14(a)(4)(C)(i) and (b)(6)(B)(i). The proposed rule change 
adds class flexibility so that the Exchange may determine different 
time periods and buffer amounts for different classes, which may 
exhibit different trading characteristics and have different market 
models.
    \10\ The System will apply a timestamp to the order (or 
unexecuted portion) based on the time it enters or is re-priced in 
the book or COB, as applicable, for priority purposes. See proposed 
Rule 6.14(a)(4)(C)(iii) and (b)(6)(B)(iii). This is consistent with 
the current drill-through functionality, pursuant to which the 
System applies a timestamp to the order (or unexecuted portion) 
based on the time it enters the book or COB, as applicable, modified 
to reflect the multiple price levels at which an order may rest. See 
current Rule 6.14(a)(4)(C) and (b)(6)(A).
    \11\ Note current Rule 6.14(a)(4)(C) and (b)(6)(B) uses the 
language ``cancel or reject'' while the proposed rule change deletes 
``reject,'' as both terms have the same result and merely relate to 
internal System code, making the use of both terms unnecessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For example, suppose the Exchange's market for a series in a class 
with a 0.05 minimum increment is 0.90-1.00, represented by a quote for 
10 contracts on each side (the quote offer is Quote A). The following 
sell orders or quote offers for the series also rest in the book:
     Order A: 10 contracts at 1.05;
     Quote B: 10 contracts at 1.10;
     Order B: 10 contracts at 1.15; and
     Order C: 20 contracts at 1.25.
    The market for away exchanges is 0.80-1.45. The Exchange's buffer 
amount for the class is 0.10, the drill-through resting time period is 
one second, and the number of time periods is three. The System 
receives an incoming order to buy 100 at 1.40, which executes against 
resting orders and quotes as follows: 10 Against Quote A at 1.00 (which 
is the national best offer), 10 against Order A at 1.05, and 10 against 
Quote B at 1.10. The System will not automatically execute any of the 
remaining 70 contracts from the incoming buy order against Order B, 
because 1.15 is more than 0.10 away from the national best offer at the 
time of order entry of 1.00 and thus exceeds the drill-through price 
check. The 70 unexecuted contracts then rest in the book for one second 
at a price of 1.10 (the initial drill-through price). No incoming 
orders are entered during that one-second time period to trade against 
the remaining 70 contracts. The System then re-prices the buy order in 
the book at a new drill-through price of 1.20 (drill-through price plus 
one buffer of 0.10). Ten contracts immediately execute against Order B 
at a price of 1.15 (the buy order is still handled as the ``incoming 
order'' that executes against the resting Order B, and thus receives 
price improvement to 1.15). An incoming order to sell 20 contracts at 
1.20 enters the book and executes against 20 of the resting contracts 
at that price. At the end of the second one-second time period, there 
are 40 remaining contracts. These contracts then rest in the book at a 
price of 1.30 for the final one second time period. Twenty contracts 
immediately execute against Order C at a price of 1.25. No incoming 
orders are entered during that time period to trade against the 
remaining 20 contracts. At the end of the final one-second time period, 
the System cancels the remaining 20 contracts.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ The proposed drill-through protection for complex orders 
works in an identical manner.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, Users may establish a higher or lower buffer amount than 
the default amount set by the Exchange with respect to complex orders 
subject to the drill-through protection.\13\ Pursuant to the proposed 
rule change, if a User establishes its own buffer amount, the drill-
through protection will work as it does today. In other words, if a 
User establishes its own buffer amount, a complex order will rest in 
the COB for one time period at the drill-through price and any 
unexecuted portion will be cancelled at the end of the time period. The 
proposed rule change clarifies that the length of the time period will 
continue to be determined by the Exchange, and will be the same as the 
length of the time period that applies to complex orders for which the 
User does not establish its own buffer amount. The Exchange believes 
this is consistent with a User's desire to set its own buffer to 
accommodate its own risk tolerance. All Users have the ability either 
to establish their own buffer amounts for complex orders, and thus have 
unexecuted orders rest for one time period, or let their complex orders 
be subject to the Exchange default buffer amount for complex orders, 
and thus have unexecuted orders rest at multiple price points for 
multiple time periods, as proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Rule 6.14(b)(6) (proposed subparagraph (b)(6)(A)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change also makes certain clarifying and 
nonsubstantive changes, including movement of certain terms and 
provisions within Rule 6.14(a)(4) and (b)(6) due to the proposed rule 
changes described above. First, the proposed rule change combines the 
provisions in current subparagraphs (A) and (B) of Rule 6.14(a)(4) into 
proposed subparagraph (A). The drill-through protection in the 
following subparagraphs of Rule 6.14(a)(4) (currently and as proposed) 
apply to orders that enter the Book at the conclusion of the opening 
auction and intraday in the same manner. Current Rule 6.14(a)(4)(B) 
(the second subparagraph (B) and (C) (proposed subparagraphs (B) and 
(C)) provide that the System handles orders not executed pursuant to 
current subparagraph (A) in accordance with those subparagraphs, 
inadvertently omitting that current subparagraphs (B) (the second 
subparagraph (C) [sic] and (C) (and proposed subparagraphs (B) and (C)) 
also apply to orders described in current first subparagraph (B).\14\ 
The proposed rule change clarifies that the drill-through protection 
applies to all orders that would enter the Book at prices worse than 
the drill-through price, including orders not executed during the 
opening auction and orders entered intraday. This is consistent with 
and a clarification of current functionality.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ The Exchange notes that current Rule 6.14(a)(4) 
inadvertently has two subparagraphs lettered (B). The proposed rule 
change, as describes above, incorporates the provisions from the 
first subparagraph (B) into subparagraph (A) and retains the second 
subparagraph (B) as the only subparagraph (B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Second, the proposed rule change adds clarifying language regarding 
how the System handles orders for which the limit price is equal to or 
less than (if a buy order) or greater than (if a sell order) the drill-
through price. Current Rule 6.14(b)(6) contemplates that complex orders 
with limit prices equal to or less aggressive than the drill-through 
price will not be subject to the mechanism pursuant to which orders 
will rest in the COB for a time period and then be cancelled. 
Specifically, Rule 6.14(b)(6)(A) states if a buy (sell) complex order 
would execute or enter the COB at a price higher (lower) than the 
drill-through price, the System enters the complex order into the COB 
with a price equal to the drill-through price and rests for the time 
period in accordance with the drill-through mechanism. Additionally, 
Rule 6.14(b)(6)(B) states that any complex order with a displayed price 
equal to the drill-through price (unless the drill-through price equals 
the order's limit price) will rest in the COB for the drill-through 
time period. Therefore, currently, if the limit price of a complex 
order is less aggressive than or equal to the drill-through price 
(i.e., if a buy (sell) complex order (or unexecuted

[[Page 68101]]

portion) would execute or enter the COB at a price lower (higher) than 
or equal to the drill-through price), the complex order will rest in 
the COB, as applicable, and the drill-through mechanism stops (i.e., 
the time period will not occur and the System will not cancel the 
order). This is also true for simple orders but is not specified in the 
current Rules.
    The proposed rule change clarifies that notwithstanding the 
provisions described above regarding an order or complex order resting 
in the book or COB, respectively, for brief time periods at drill-
through prices, if a buy (sell) order's limit price equals or is less 
(greater) than the drill-through price at any time during application 
of the drill-through mechanism, the order rests in the book or COB, as 
applicable, subject to a User's instructions,\15\ at its limit price 
and any remaining time period(s) described above do not occur.\16\ If 
the drill-through price is equal to or more aggressive than the order's 
limit price, the additional protection of having the order rest in the 
COB for a short time period is not necessary given that the order will 
rest at the limit price entered by the User (and thus an acceptable 
execution price for that User). Additionally, displaying an order at a 
drill-through price (a price at which execution is possible) worse than 
the limit price of the order would be inconsistent with the terms of 
the order. This is consistent with current functionality (updated to 
reflect the proposed rule change to allow multiple time periods) and 
the definition of limit orders and merely clarifies this in the Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ For example, the order will remain in force subject to any 
time-in-force instruction applied to the order by the User upon 
entry.
    \16\ See proposed Rule 6.14(a)(4)(C)(iv) and (b)(6)(B)(iv).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Third, the proposed rule change corrects the market order reference 
in current and proposed Rule 6.14(a)(4)(C) (to limit order. That 
subparagraph relates to orders with times-in-force of day, GTC, or GTD 
that will rest in the book for a time period at the drill-through 
price. However, market orders by definition \17\ do not rest in the 
book and would not have those times-in-force, which are contrary to the 
character of market orders. The System applies the functionality 
described in that subparagraph to limit orders with those times-in-
force. The proposed rule change conforms the rule to current System 
functionality and to the definition of market and limit orders, as 
limit orders not fully executed upon entry will rest in the book while 
market orders not fully executed upon entry will be cancelled and not 
rest in the book.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Rule 5.6(b).
    \18\ The proposed rule change also reorders the terms limit and 
market orders in current Rule 6.14(a)(4)(B) (the second subparagraph 
(B), which is proposed subparagraph (a)(4)(B)). As noted above, 
current Rule 6.14(a)(4) inadvertently has two subparagraphs lettered 
(B). The proposed rule change, as describes above, incorporates the 
provisions from the first subparagraph (B) into subparagraph (A) and 
retains the second subparagraph (B) as the only subparagraph 
(B).This is a nonsubstantive change, as the times-in-force of 
immediate-or-cancel or fill-or-kill described in that subparagraph 
are applicable to limit orders rather than market orders, which by 
definition are immediate-or-cancel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Fourth, the proposed rule change clarifies in proposed Rule 
6.14(b)(6)(B)(ii) that if the synthetic best bid or offer (``SBBO'') 
changes prior to the end of any time period but the complex order 
cannot leg into the simple book, and the new SBB or SBO, as applicable, 
crosses the drill-through price, the System changes the displayed price 
of the complex order to the new SBB or SBO, as applicable, plus or 
minus the applicable minimum increment for the class. The current Rule 
states that $0.01 is added to or subtracted from the new SBBO. However, 
a class may have a minimum increment other than $0.01 pursuant to Rule 
5.4(b). Currently, the System adds or subtracts the applicable minimum 
increment. The proposed rule change corrects an inadvertent error in 
the Rules to conform to current System functionality and Rules 
regarding minimum increments for complex orders. The proposed rule 
change will ensure that a complex order will rest in the COB only with 
a displayed price in the applicable minimum increment applicable for 
the class of that complex order. The proposed rule change also 
clarifies that the complex order will rest in the COB (the current rule 
text says the complex order is not cancelled), and adds detail that the 
complex order rests at that displayed price, subject to a User's 
instructions, and if it was not the final period, any remaining time 
period(s) do not occur.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and 
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular, 
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\19\ Specifically, the 
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the 
Section 6(b)(5) \20\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be 
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to 
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation 
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, 
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating 
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, 
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally, 
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the 
Section 6(b)(5) \21\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be 
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, 
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \21\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Exchange believes the proposed enhancement to 
the drill-through mechanism removes impediments to and perfects the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, 
in general, protects investors and the public interest. The proposed 
rule change will permit orders (or unexecuted portions) to rest in the 
book or COB, as applicable, at different displayed prices for a brief 
but overall longer period of time, which will provide market 
participants' orders with additional execution opportunities while 
continuing to protect them against execution at potentially erroneous 
prices. The proposed enhancement to the drill-through protection is 
similar to current drill-through functionality. The Exchange may 
determine the buffer amount for orders and the time period in which 
orders may rest in the book or COB. The proposed rule change permits an 
order to rest at multiples of the buffer amount, which would have the 
same effect as the Exchange setting a larger buffer amount. For 
example, if the Exchange set a buffer amount of $0.75, that would allow 
orders to execute at any price no further than $0.75 away from the NBBO 
or SNBBO at the time of order entry (including at prices $0.25 and 
$0.50 away from the NBBO or SNBBO at the time of order entry). This 
allows for the same potential execution prices that would be possible 
if the Exchange set a buffer of $0.25 and three time periods under the 
proposed rule change. While the overall time period for which an order 
may rest in the book or COB may be longer than the currently 
permissible time period, the longer time period will still be 
relatively brief (maximum of 15 seconds). The Exchange notes it may 
maintain the same buffer amounts that are in place today. However, 
rather than increase the buffer amount at one time, the proposed rule 
change adds the overall larger

[[Page 68102]]

buffer amount incrementally over a potentially overall longer time 
period. While this may permit executions at prices farther away from 
the NBBO or SNBBO at the time of order entry, it will still never 
permit executions at prices through orders' limit prices. This will 
provide execution opportunities for orders at incremental amounts away 
from the NBBO or SNBBO, as applicable, over a slightly longer time 
period and thus against a potentially larger number of orders. Users 
also have the ability to cancel orders prior to the completion of the 
time periods if they do not want the orders resting for a longer period 
of time (and Users can set their own buffer for complex orders, which 
would cause those complex orders to rest for a single time period 
rather than multiple as proposed).
    The Exchange believes the proposed clarifying and nonsubstantive 
changes to the drill-through protection rules protect investors by 
adding transparency to the rules regarding the drill-through 
functionality. These changes are consistent with current functionality 
and thus do not impact the applicability of the drill-through mechanism 
to orders.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not 
believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on 
intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the enhanced drill-
through protection will apply to all marketable orders in the same 
manner. Users may cancel orders resting on the Book during the drill-
through time periods or set their own buffer with respect to complex 
orders if they do not want their orders resting for a longer period of 
time as proposed.
    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because it 
relates solely to how and when marketable orders will rest on the 
Exchange's book or COB. The proposed enhancement to the drill-through 
protection is consistent with the current protection and provides 
orders subject to the protection with additional execution 
opportunities while providing continued protection against execution 
against potentially erroneous prices.
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change would ultimately 
provide all market participants with additional execution opportunities 
when appropriate while providing protection from erroneous execution. 
The Exchange believes the proposal will enhance risk protections, the 
individual firm benefits of which flow downstream to counterparties 
both at the Exchange and at other options exchanges, which increases 
systemic protections as well. The Exchange believes enhancing risk 
protections will allow Users to enter orders and quotes with further 
reduced fear of inadvertent exposure to excessive risk, which will 
benefit investors through increased liquidity for the execution of 
their orders. Without adequate risk management tools, such as the one 
proposed to be enhanced in this filing, Trading Permit Holders could 
reduce the amount of order flow and liquidity they provide. Such 
actions may undermine the quality of the markets available to customers 
and other market participants. Accordingly, the proposed rule change is 
designed to encourage Trading Permit Holders to submit additional order 
flow and liquidity to the Exchange. The proposed flexibility may 
similarly provide additional execution opportunities, which further 
benefits liquidity in potentially volatile markets. In addition, 
providing Trading Permit Holders with more tools for managing risk will 
facilitate transactions in securities because, as noted above, Trading 
Permit Holders will have more confidence protections are in place that 
reduce the risks from potential system errors and market events.
    The proposed clarifying and nonsubstantive changes are consistent 
with current functionality and are intended to add clarity to the 
Rules, and thus the Exchange expects those changes to have no 
competitive impact.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) 
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public 
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) 
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or 
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become 
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \22\ and 
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \23\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) 
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission 
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along 
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at 
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed 
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. 
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) 
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the 
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the 
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the 
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-C2-2020-016 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2020-016. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the

[[Page 68103]]

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting 
comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal 
identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2020-016 and should be 
submitted on or before November 17, 2020.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-23685 Filed 10-26-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P