Document ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2002-0262-0001
Agency: epa
Document Type: Notice
Title: Endosulfan;  Availability of the Reregistration Eligibility Decision Documents for Comment
Posted Date: 2002-11-06T05:00Z

67617
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
67,
No.
215
/
Wednesday,
November
6,
2002
/
Notices
Guidelines
is
an
appropriate
step
in
effectively
implementing
SBLRBRA.
All
written
comments
must
be
received
by
the
Agency
no
later
than
seven
calendar
days
from
federal
notice
publication.
The
Agency
will
carefully
consider
written
comments
received
during
the
public
comment
period,
prior
to
issuing
final
Brownfields
Job
Training
Grant
Application
Guidelines
in
November,
2002.
2002.
However,
due
to
the
need
to
promptly
provide
the
final
FY
03
Job
Training
Guidelines
to
potential
applicants,
EPA
does
not
plan
to
respond
in
writing
to
written
comments.

Dated:
October
24,
2002.
Linda
Garczynski,
Director,
Office
of
Brownfields
Cleanup
and
Redevelopment,
Office
of
Solid
Waste
and
Emergency
Response.
[
FR
Doc.
02
 
28211
Filed
11
 
5
 
02;
8:
45
am]

BILLING
CODE
6560
 
50
 
M
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
[
OPP
 
2002
 
0262;
FRL
 
7275
 
5]

Endosulfan;
Availability
of
Reregistration
Eligibility
Decision
Documents
for
Comment
AGENCY:
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA).
ACTION:
Notice.

SUMMARY:
This
notice
announces
availability
and
starts
a
60
 
day
public
comment
period
on
the
Reregistration
Eligibility
Decision
(
RED)
document
for
the
pesticide
active
ingredient
endosulfan.
The
RED
represents
EPA's
formal
regulatory
assessment
of
the
health
and
environmental
database
of
the
subject
chemical
and
presents
the
Agency's
determination
regarding
which
pesticidal
uses
are
eligible
for
reregistration.
DATES:
Comments,
identified
by
docket
ID
number
OPP
 
2002
 
0262,
must
be
received
on
or
before
January
6,
2003.
ADDRESSES:
Comments
may
be
submitted
electronically,
by
mail,
or
through
hand
delivery/
courier.
Follow
the
detailed
instructions
as
provided
in
Unit
I.
of
the
SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.

FOR
FURTHER
INFORMATION
CONTACT:
Stacey
Milan,
Chemical
Review
Manager,
Special
Review
and
Reregistration
Division
(
7508C),
Office
of
Pesticide
Programs,
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
1200
Pennsylvania
Ave.,
NW.,
Washington,
DC
20460
 
0001;
telephone
number:
(
703)
305
 
2505;
e­
mail
address:
milan.
stacey@
epa.
gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION:

I.
General
Information
A.
Does
this
Action
Apply
to
Me?

This
action
is
directed
to
the
public
in
general.
This
action
may,
however,
be
of
interest
to
persons
who
are
or
may
be
required
to
conduct
testing
of
chemical
substances
under
the
Federal
Insecticide,
Fungicide,
and
Rodenticide
Act
(
FIFRA)
or
the
Federal
Food,
Drug,
and
Cosmetic
Act
(
FFDCA);
environmental,
human
health,
and
agricultural
advocates;
pesticides
users;
and
members
of
the
public
interested
in
the
use
of
pesticides.
Since
other
entities
may
also
be
interested,
the
Agency
has
not
attempted
to
describe
all
the
specific
entities
that
may
be
affected
by
this
action.
If
you
have
any
questions
regarding
the
applicability
of
this
action
to
a
particular
entity,
consult
the
person
listed
under
FOR
FURTHER
INFORMATION
CONTACT.

B.
How
Can
I
Get
Copies
of
this
Document
and
Other
Related
Information?

1.
Docket.
EPA
has
established
an
official
public
docket
for
this
action
under
docket
identification
(
ID)
number
OPP
 
2002
 
0262.
The
official
public
docket
consists
of
the
documents
specifically
referenced
in
this
action,
any
public
comments
received,
and
other
information
related
to
this
action.
Although
a
part
of
the
official
docket,
the
public
docket
does
not
include
Confidential
Business
Information
(
CBI)
or
other
information
whose
disclosure
is
restricted
by
statute.
The
official
public
docket
is
the
collection
of
materials
that
is
available
for
public
viewing
at
the
Public
Information
and
Records
Integrity
Branch
(
PIRIB),
Rm.
119,
Crystal
Mall
#
2,
1921
Jefferson
Davis
Hwy.,
Arlington,
VA.
This
docket
facility
is
open
from
8:
30
a.
m.
to
4
p.
m.,
Monday
through
Friday,
excluding
legal
holidays.
The
docket
telephone
number
is
(
703)
305
 
5805.
2.
Electronic
access.
You
may
access
this
Federal
Register
document
electronically
through
the
EPA
Internet
under
the
``
Federal
Register''
listings
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
fedrgstr/.
To
access
RED
documents
and
RED
fact
sheets
electronically,
go
directly
to
the
REDs
table
on
the
EPA
Office
of
Pesticide
Programs
Home
Page,
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
pesticides/
reregistration/
status.
htm.
An
electronic
version
of
the
public
docket
is
available
through
EPA's
electronic
public
docket
and
comment
system,
EPA
Dockets.
You
may
use
EPA
Dockets
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
edocket/
to
submit
or
view
public
comments,
access
the
index
listing
of
the
contents
of
the
official
public
docket,
and
to
access
those
documents
in
the
public
docket
that
are
available
electronically.
Once
in
the
system,
select
``
search,''
then
key
in
the
appropriate
docket
ID
number.
Certain
types
of
information
will
not
be
placed
in
the
EPA
Dockets.
Information
claimed
as
CBI
and
other
information
whose
disclosure
is
restricted
by
statute,
which
is
not
included
in
the
official
public
docket,
will
not
be
available
for
public
viewing
in
EPA's
electronic
public
docket.
EPA's
policy
is
that
copyrighted
material
will
not
be
placed
in
EPA's
electronic
public
docket
but
will
be
available
only
in
printed,
paper
form
in
the
official
public
docket.
To
the
extent
feasible,
publicly
available
docket
materials
will
be
made
available
in
EPA's
electronic
public
docket.
When
a
document
is
selected
from
the
index
list
in
EPA
Dockets,
the
system
will
identify
whether
the
document
is
available
for
viewing
in
EPA's
electronic
public
docket.
Although
not
all
docket
materials
may
be
available
electronically,
you
may
still
access
any
of
the
publicly
available
docket
materials
through
the
docket
facility
identified
in
Unit
I.
B.
1.
EPA
intends
to
work
towards
providing
electronic
access
to
all
of
the
publicly
available
docket
materials
through
EPA's
electronic
public
docket.
For
public
commenters,
it
is
important
to
note
that
EPA's
policy
is
that
public
comments,
whether
submitted
electronically
or
in
paper,
will
be
made
available
for
public
viewing
in
EPA's
electronic
public
docket
as
EPA
receives
them
and
without
change,
unless
the
comment
contains
copyrighted
material,
CBI,
or
other
information
whose
disclosure
is
restricted
by
statute.
When
EPA
identifies
a
comment
containing
copyrighted
material,
EPA
will
provide
a
reference
to
that
material
in
the
version
of
the
comment
that
is
placed
in
EPA's
electronic
public
docket.
The
entire
printed
comment,
including
the
copyrighted
material,
will
be
available
in
the
public
docket.
Public
comments
submitted
on
computer
disks
that
are
mailed
or
delivered
to
the
docket
will
be
transferred
to
EPA's
electronic
public
docket.
Public
comments
that
are
mailed
or
delivered
to
the
docket
will
be
scanned
and
placed
in
EPA's
electronic
public
docket.
Where
practical,
physical
objects
will
be
photographed,
and
the
photograph
will
be
placed
in
EPA's
electronic
public
docket
along
with
a
brief
description
written
by
the
docket
staff.

VerDate
0ct<
31>
2002
16:
55
Nov
05,
2002
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00031
Fmt
4703
Sfmt
4703
E:\
FR\
FM\
06NON1.
SGM
06NON1
67618
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
67,
No.
215
/
Wednesday,
November
6,
2002
/
Notices
C.
How
and
To
Whom
Do
I
Submit
Comments?

You
may
submit
comments
electronically,
by
mail,
or
through
hand
delivery/
courier.
To
ensure
proper
receipt
by
EPA,
identify
the
appropriate
docket
ID
number
in
the
subject
line
on
the
first
page
of
your
comment.
Please
ensure
that
your
comments
are
submitted
within
the
specified
comment
period.
Comments
received
after
the
close
of
the
comment
period
will
be
marked
``
late.''
EPA
is
not
required
to
consider
these
late
comments.
If
you
wish
to
submit
CBI
or
information
that
is
otherwise
protected
by
statute,
please
follow
the
instructions
in
Unit
I.
D.
Do
not
use
EPA
Dockets
or
e­
mail
to
submit
CBI
or
information
protected
by
statute.
1.
Electronically.
If
you
submit
an
electronic
comment
as
prescribed
in
this
unit,
EPA
recommends
that
you
include
your
name,
mailing
address,
and
an
email
address
or
other
contact
information
in
the
body
of
your
comment.
Also
include
this
contact
information
on
the
outside
of
any
disk
or
CD
ROM
you
submit,
and
in
any
cover
letter
accompanying
the
disk
or
CD
ROM.
This
ensures
that
you
can
be
identified
as
the
submitter
of
the
comment
and
allows
EPA
to
contact
you
in
case
EPA
cannot
read
your
comment
due
to
technical
difficulties
or
needs
further
information
on
the
substance
of
your
comment.
EPA's
policy
is
that
EPA
will
not
edit
your
comment,
and
any
identifying
or
contact
information
provided
in
the
body
of
a
comment
will
be
included
as
part
of
the
comment
that
is
placed
in
the
official
public
docket,
and
made
available
in
EPA's
electronic
public
docket.
If
EPA
cannot
read
your
comment
due
to
technical
difficulties
and
cannot
contact
you
for
clarification,
EPA
may
not
be
able
to
consider
your
comment.
i.
EPA
Dockets.
Your
use
of
EPA's
electronic
public
docket
to
submit
comments
to
EPA
electronically
is
EPA's
preferred
method
for
receiving
comments.
Go
directly
to
EPA
Dockets
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
edocket,
and
follow
the
online
instructions
for
submitting
comments.
Once
in
the
system,
select
``
search,''
and
then
key
in
docket
ID
number
OPP
 
2002
 
0262.
The
system
is
an
``
anonymous
access''
system,
which
means
EPA
will
not
know
your
identity,
e­
mail
address,
or
other
contact
information
unless
you
provide
it
in
the
body
of
your
comment.
ii.
E­
mail.
Comments
may
be
sent
by
e­
mail
to
opp­
docket@
epa.
gov,
Attention:
Docket
ID
Number
OPP
 
2002
 
0262.
In
contrast
to
EPA's
electronic
public
docket,
EPA's
e­
mail
system
is
not
an
``
anonymous
access''
system.
If
you
send
an
e­
mail
comment
directly
to
the
docket
without
going
through
EPA's
electronic
public
docket,
EPA's
e­
mail
system
automatically
captures
your
e­
mail
address.
E­
mail
addresses
that
are
automatically
captured
by
EPA's
e­
mail
system
are
included
as
part
of
the
comment
that
is
placed
in
the
official
public
docket,
and
made
available
in
EPA's
electronic
public
docket.
iii.
Disk
or
CD
ROM.
You
may
submit
comments
on
a
disk
or
CD
ROM
that
you
mail
to
the
mailing
address
identified
in
Unit
I.
C.
2.
These
electronic
submissions
will
be
accepted
in
WordPerfect
or
ASCII
file
format.
Avoid
the
use
of
special
characters
and
any
form
of
encryption.
2.
By
mail.
Send
your
comments
to:
Public
Information
and
Records
Integrity
Branch
(
PIRIB)
(
7502C),
Office
of
Pesticide
Programs
(
OPP),
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
1200
Pennsylvania
Ave.,
NW.,
Washington,
DC
20460
 
0001,
Attention:
Docket
ID
Number
OPP
 
2002
 
0262.
3.
By
hand
delivery
or
courier.
Deliver
your
comments
to:
Public
Information
and
Records
Integrity
Branch
(
PIRIB),
Office
of
Pesticide
Programs
(
OPP),
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Rm.
119,
Crystal
Mall
#
2,
1921
Jefferson
Davis
Hwy.,
Arlington,
VA,
Attention:
Docket
ID
Number
OPP
 
2002
 
0262.
Such
deliveries
are
only
accepted
during
the
docket's
normal
hours
of
operation
as
identified
in
Unit
I.
B.
1.

D.
How
Should
I
Submit
CBI
to
the
Agency?
Do
not
submit
information
that
you
consider
to
be
CBI
electronically
through
EPA's
electronic
public
docket
or
by
e­
mail.
You
may
claim
information
that
you
submit
to
EPA
as
CBI
by
marking
any
part
or
all
of
that
information
as
CBI
(
if
you
submit
CBI
on
disk
or
CD
ROM,
mark
the
outside
of
the
disk
or
CD
ROM
as
CBI
and
then
identify
electronically
within
the
disk
or
CD
ROM
the
specific
information
that
is
CBI).
Information
so
marked
will
not
be
disclosed
except
in
accordance
with
procedures
set
forth
in
40
CFR
part
2.
In
addition
to
one
complete
version
of
the
comment
that
includes
any
information
claimed
as
CBI,
a
copy
of
the
comment
that
does
not
contain
the
information
claimed
as
CBI
must
be
submitted
for
inclusion
in
the
public
docket
and
EPA's
electronic
public
docket.
If
you
submit
the
copy
that
does
not
contain
CBI
on
disk
or
CD
ROM,
mark
the
outside
of
the
disk
or
CD
ROM
clearly
that
it
does
not
contain
CBI.
Information
not
marked
as
CBI
will
be
included
in
the
public
docket
and
EPA's
electronic
public
docket
without
prior
notice.
If
you
have
any
questions
about
CBI
or
the
procedures
for
claiming
CBI,
please
consult
the
person
listed
under
FOR
FURTHER
INFORMATION
CONTACT.

E.
What
Should
I
Consider
as
I
Prepare
My
Comments
for
EPA?
You
may
find
the
following
suggestions
helpful
for
preparing
your
comments:
1.
Explain
your
views
as
clearly
as
possible.
2.
Describe
any
assumptions
that
you
used.
3.
Provide
copies
of
any
technical
information
and/
or
data
you
used
that
support
your
views.
4.
If
you
estimate
potential
burden
or
costs,
explain
how
you
arrived
at
the
estimate
that
you
provide.
5.
Provide
specific
examples
to
illustrate
your
concerns.
6.
Offer
alternative
ways
to
improve
the
notice
or
collection
activity.
7.
Make
sure
to
submit
your
comments
by
the
deadline
in
this
document.
8.
To
ensure
proper
receipt
by
EPA,
be
sure
to
identify
the
docket
ID
number
assigned
to
this
action
in
the
subject
line
on
the
first
page
of
your
response.
You
may
also
provide
the
name,
date,
and
Federal
Register
citation.

II.
Background
A.
What
Action
Is
the
Agency
Taking?
The
Agency
has
issued
a
RED
for
the
pesticide
active
ingredient
endosulfan.
Under
the
Federal
Insecticide,
Fungicide,
and
Rodenticide
Act
(
FIFRA),
as
amended
in
1988,
EPA
is
conducting
an
accelerated
reregistration
program
to
reevaluate
existing
pesticides
to
make
sure
they
meet
current
scientific
and
regulatory
standards.
The
database
to
support
the
reregistration
of
endosulfan
is
substantially
complete,
and
the
Agency
has
identified
risk
mitigation
measures
that
if
adopted
by
the
registrants
will
address
the
human
health
and
ecological
risks
associated
with
the
current
uses
of
endosulfan.
Additional
mitigation
measures
for
ecological
risk
may
be
warranted
following
the
completion
of
a
stakeholder
process,
which
will
be
conducted
to
address
environmental
risks
to
especially
vulnerable
aquatic
organisms.
In
addition,
EPA
is
reevaluating
existing
pesticides
and
reassessing
tolerances
under
the
Food
Quality
Protection
Act
(
FQPA)
of
1996.
The
tolerances
for
those
food
uses
that
will
remain,
following
mitigation
identified
in
the
RED,
have
been
found
to
meet
the
FQPA
Safety
Standard.
All
registrants
of
pesticide
products
containing
endosulfan
will
be
sent
the
VerDate
0ct<
31>
2002
16:
55
Nov
05,
2002
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00032
Fmt
4703
Sfmt
4703
E:\
FR\
FM\
06NON1.
SGM
06NON1
67619
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
67,
No.
215
/
Wednesday,
November
6,
2002
/
Notices
appropriate
RED,
and
in
order
to
be
reregistered,
the
risk
concerns
identified
in
the
RED
must
be
adequately
addressed,
including
appropriate
labeling
changes.
Further,
the
registrants
must
comply
with
product
specific
label
requirements
pending
Office
of
Management
and
Budget
(
OMB)
approval
of
the
endosulfan
Data­
Call­
In.
The
reregistration
program
is
being
conducted
under
Congressionally
mandated
timeframes,
and
EPA
recognizes
the
need
both
to
make
timely
reregistration
decisions
and
to
involve
the
public.
Therefore,
EPA
is
issuing
the
endosulfan
RED
as
a
final
document
with
a
60
 
day
comment
period.
Although
the
60
 
day
public
comment
period
does
not
affect
the
registrant's
response
due
date,
it
is
intended
to
provide
an
opportunity
for
public
input
and
a
mechanism
for
identifying
any
necessary
amendments
to
the
RED.
All
comments
will
be
carefully
considered
by
the
Agency.
If
any
comment
significantly
affects
the
endosulfan
RED,
EPA
will
amend
the
RED
by
publishing
the
amendment
in
the
Federal
Register.

B.
What
is
the
Agency's
Authority
for
Taking
this
Action?

The
legal
authority
for
this
RED
falls
under
FIFRA,
as
amended
in
1988
and
1996.
Section
4(
g)(
2)(
A)
of
FIFRA
directs
that,
after
submission
of
all
data
concerning
a
pesticide
active
ingredient,
``
the
Administrator
shall
determine
whether
pesticides
containing
such
active
ingredient
are
eligible
for
reregistration,''
before
calling
in
product
specific
data
on
individual
end­
use
products,
and
either
reregistering
products
or
taking
``
other
appropriate
regulatory
action.''

List
of
Subjects
Environmental
protection,
Chemicals,
Pesticides
and
pests.

Dated:
October
30,
2002.
Betty
Shackleford,
Acting
Director,
Special
Review
and
Reregistration
Division,
Office
of
Pesticide
Programs.

[
FR
Doc.
02
 
28216
Filed
11
 
5
 
02;
8:
45
am]

BILLING
CODE
6560
 
50
 
S
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
[
FRL
 
7404
 
9]

Koppers
Charleston
Superfund
Site;
Notice
To
Rescind
Federal
Register
Notice
Dated
October
1,
2002
AGENCY:
Environmental
Protection
Agency.
ACTION:
Notice
to
rescind
previous
Federal
Register
notice.

SUMMARY:
On
October
1,
2002
at
67
FR
61624,
the
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA)
published
a
Notice
of
Proposed
Settlement
for
response
costs
incurred
by
EPA
at
the
Koppers
Charleston
Superfund
Site
located
in
Charleston,
Charleston
County,
South
Carolina.
That
notice
was
published
prematurely.
The
purpose
of
this
notice
is
to
rescind
EPA's
October
1,
2002
Federal
Register
Notice
regarding
the
settlement
of
response
costs
at
the
Site.
The
Notice
of
Proposed
Settlement
for
the
Site
may
be
republished
in
the
future
following
final
approval
of
the
settlement.

FOR
FURTHER
INFORMATION
CONTACT:
Paula
Batchelor
at
404
 
562
 
8887.

Dated:
October
23,
2002.
Anita
L.
Davis,
Acting
Chief,
CERCLA
Program
Services
Branch,
Waste
Management
Division.
[
FR
Doc.
02
 
28214
Filed
11
 
5
 
02;
8:
45
am]

BILLING
CODE
6560
 
50
 
P
FEDERAL
COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[
WC
Docket
No.
02
 
214;
FCC
02
 
297]

Application
by
Verizon
Virginia
Inc.,
Verizon
Long
Distance
Virginia,
Inc.,
Verizon
Enterprise
Solutions
Virginia
Inc.,
Verizon
Global
Networks
Inc.,
and
Verizon
Select
Services
of
Virginia
Inc.,
Pursuant
to
Section
271
of
the
Telecommunications
Act
of
1996,
For
Provision
of
In­
Region,
InterLATA
Services
in
the
State
of
Virginia
AGENCY:
Federal
Communications
Commission.
ACTION:
Notice.

SUMMARY:
In
this
document,
the
Federal
Communications
Commission
grants
the
section
271
application
of
Verizon
Virginia
Inc.,
et
al.
(
Verizon)
for
authority
to
enter
the
interLATA
telecommunications
market
in
the
state
of
Virginia.
The
Commission
grants
Verizon's
application
based
on
its
conclusion
that
Verizon
has
satisfied
all
of
the
statutory
requirements
for
entry,
and
opened
its
local
exchange
markets
to
full
competition.
DATES:
Effective
November
8,
2002.

FOR
FURTHER
INFORMATION
CONTACT:
Uzoma
Onyeije,
Attorney­
Advisor,
Wireline
Competition
Bureau,
at
(
202)
418
 
7827
or
via
the
Internet
at
uonyeije@
fcc.
gov.
The
complete
text
of
this
Memorandum
Opinion
and
Order
is
available
for
inspection
and
copying
during
normal
business
hours
in
the
FCC
Reference
Information
Center,
Portals
II,
445
12th
Street,
SW,
Room
CY
 
A257,
Washington,
DC
20554.
Further
information
may
also
be
obtained
by
calling
the
Common
Carrier
Bureau's
TTY
number:
(
202)
418
 
0484.
SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION:
This
is
a
summary
of
the
Commission's
Memorandum
Opinion
and
Order
(
MO&
O)
in
WC
Docket
No.
02
 
214,
FCC
02
 
297,
adopted
October
30,
2002,
and
released
October
30,
2002.
This
full
text
may
be
purchased
from
the
Commission's
duplicating
contractor,
Qualex
International,
Portals
II,
445
12th
Street,
SW,
Room
CY­
B402,
Washington,
DC
20554,
telephone
202
 
863
 
2893,
facsimile
202
 
863
 
2898,
or
via
e­
mail
qualexint@
aol.
com.
It
is
also
available
on
the
Commission's
website
at
http://
www.
fcc.
gov/
Bureaus/
Wireline_
Competition/
in­
region
 
applications.

Synopsis
of
the
Order
1.
History
of
the
Application.
On
August
1,
2002,
Verizon
filed
an
application
pursuant
to
section
271
of
the
Telecommunications
Act
of
1996,
with
the
Commission
to
provide
inregion
interLATA
service
originating
in
the
state
of
Virginia.
Interested
parties
filed
comments
on
August
21,
2002,
and
reply
comments
on
September
12,
2002.
2.
The
State
Commission's
Evaluation.
On
March
15,
2002,
Verizon
made
a
compliance
filing
for
section
271
approval
with
the
Virginia
Commission.
On
July
12,
2002,
the
Virginia
Hearing
Examiner
issued
a
report
recommending
that
the
Virginia
Commission
``
advise
the
FCC
that
this
Commission
supports
granting
Verizon
authority
to
provide
in­
region
interLATA
services
in
Virginia.''
On
August
1,
2002,
the
Virginia
Commission
forwarded
the
Virginia
Hearing
Examiner's
Report
to
this
Commission,
reporting
on
the
Virginia
Hearing
Examiner's
section
271
proceeding
and
urging
the
Commission
to
consider
his
recommendations
and
findings.
3.
The
Department
of
Justice's
Evaluation.
The
Department
of
Justice
filed
its
evaluation
on
September
5,
2002,
concluding
that
Verizon
has
generally
succeeded
in
opening
its
markets
to
competition
in
most
respects.
Accordingly,
the
Department
of
Justice
recommends
approval
of
Verizon's
application
for
section
271
authority
in
Virginia.
4.
Compliance
with
Section
271(
c)(
1)(
A).
The
Commission
concludes
that
Verizon
demonstrates
that
it
satisfies
the
requirements
of
section
271(
c)(
1)(
A)
based
on
the
interconnection
agreements
it
has
VerDate
0ct<
31>
2002
16:
55
Nov
05,
2002
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00033
Fmt
4703
Sfmt
4703
E:\
FR\
FM\
06NON1.
SGM
06NON1