Document ID: NHTSA-2021-0045-0002
Agency: nhtsa
Document Type: Notice
Title: Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance: Vermeer Manufacturing Co.
Posted Date: 2022-06-17T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 117 (Friday, June 17, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36577-36579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13078]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2021-0045; Notice 1]

Vermeer Manufacturing Company, Receipt of Petition for Decision 
of Inconsequential Noncompliance

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Receipt of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Vermeer Manufacturing Company (``Vermeer'') has determined 
that certain Model Year (MY) 2006-2021 Vermeer, Vac-Tron, and 
McLaughlin trailers manufactured by its subsidiary, Vermeer MV 
Solutions, Inc. (including its predecessors in interest Mclaughlin 
Group, Inc. and Vac-Tron Equipment, LLC) do not fully comply with 
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 110, Tire Selection 
and Rims and Motor Home/Recreation Vehicle Trailer Load Carrying 
Capacity Information for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536 Kilograms 
(10,000 Pounds) or Less. Vermeer filed a noncompliance report dated 
April 26, 2021, and amended it on May 14, 2021, and May 20, 2021. 
Simultaneously, Vermeer petitioned NHTSA on May 20, 2021, and amended 
it on June 10, 2021, for a decision that the subject noncompliance is 
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety. This notice 
announces receipt of Vermeer's petition.

DATES: Send comments on or before July 18, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data, 
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the 
docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and 
submitted by any of the following methods:
     Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to the U.S. 
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building 
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 
20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver comments by hand to the U.S. 
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building 
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 
20590. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. 
except for Federal holidays.
     Electronically: Submit comments electronically by logging 
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) website at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting 
comments.
     Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
    Comments must be written in the English language and be no greater 
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of 
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in 
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish 
to receive confirmation that comments you have

[[Page 36578]]

submitted by mail were received, please enclose a stamped, self-
addressed postcard with the comments. Note that all comments received 
will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including 
any personal information provided.
    All comments and supporting materials received before the close of 
business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the 
docket and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials 
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be 
considered to the fullest extent possible.
    When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will 
also be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority 
indicated at the end of this notice.
    All comments, background documentation, and supporting materials 
submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and 
times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the internet at 
https://www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for 
accessing the docket. The docket ID number for this petition is shown 
in the heading of this notice.
    DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a 
Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ahmad Barnes, Office of Vehicle Safety 
Compliance, NHTSA, (202) 366-7236.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Overview

    Vermeer has determined that certain MY 2006-2021 Vermeer, Vac-Tron, 
and McLaughlin trailers do not fully comply with the requirements of 
paragraph S4.3.5 of FMVSS No. 110, Tire Selection and Rims and Motor 
Home/Recreation Vehicle Trailer Load Carrying Capacity Information for 
Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536 Kilograms (10,000 Pounds) or Less 
(49 CFR 571.110). Vermeer filed an original noncompliance report dated 
April 26, 2021, and amended it on May 14, 2021, and May 20, 2021. 
Vermeer simultaneously petitioned NHTSA on May 20, 2021, and amended it 
on June 10, 2021, for an exemption from the notification and remedy 
requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this 
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety, 
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556, 
Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or Noncompliance.
    This notice of receipt of Vermeer's petition is published under 49 
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any Agency decision or 
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.

II. Trailers Involved

    Approximately 1,308 of the following MY 2006-2021 Vermeer, Vac-
Tron, and McLaughlin trailers, manufactured by Vermeer's subsidiary, 
Vermeer MV Solutions, Inc. (including its predecessors in interest 
Mclaughlin Group, Inc. and Vac-Tron Equipment, LLC) between March 1, 
2006, and April 28, 2021, are potentially involved:

 MY 2021 Vermeer LPMINI
 MY 2014-2021 Vac-Tron LPMINI
 MY 2021 Vermeer LPMINIXDT
 MY 2019-2021 Vac-Tron LPSDT
 MY 2021 Vermeer LPSDT
 MY 2019-2020 Vac-Tron LPSGT
 MY 2021 Vermeer LPSGT
 MY 2019-2021 Vac-Tron LPXDT
 MY 2014-2020 Vac Tron LPMINIXDT
 MY 2015-2019 Vac Tron LP573XDT
 MY 2015 Vac-Tron CS530GT
 MY 2013 Vac-Tron CS555GT
 MY 2016-2018 Vac-Tron CS570GT
 MY 2018 Vac-Tron CS573GT
 MY 2017-2018 Vac-Tron CV570GT
 MY 2017-2018 Vac-Tron CV570SGT
 MY 2016-2018 Vac-Tron CV573GT
 MY 2016-2019 Vac-Tron CV573SGT
 MY 2019-2021 Vac-Tron CVGT
 MY 2021 Vermeer CVGT
 MY 2019-2021 Vac-Tron CVSGT
 MY 2021 Vermeer LPXDT
 MY 2021 Vermeer CVSGT
 MY 2016 Vac-Tron EV150DT
 MY 2011-2019 Vac-Tron EV150GT
 MY 2019-2021 Vac Tron EVGT
 MY 2006 Vac-Tron FM150SGT
 MY 2008 Vac-Tron FM350SDT
 MY 2011-2018 Vac-Tron JETTERTLR
 MY 2013-2017 Vac-Tron LP303GT
 MY 2016 Vac-Tron LP303XDT
 MY 2011-2013 Vac-Tron LP305DT
 MY 2012 Vac-Tron LP305GT
 MY 2014 Vac-Tron LP333DT
 MY 2014-2015 Vac-Tron LP333GT
 MY 2011-2012 Vac-Tron LP355DT
 MY 2013 Vac-Tron LP355GT
 MY 2018 Vac-Tron LP370XDT
 MY 2015-2019 Vac-Tron LP373GT
 MY 2016-2018 Vac-Tron LP373SGT
 MY 2017 Vac-Tron AIR373SDT
 MY 2017-2018 Vac-Tron LP373XDT
 MY 2013 Vac-Tron LP500DT
 MY 2011 Vac-Tron LP500GT
 MY 2013-2017 Vac-Tron LP533SDT
 MY 2015 Vac-Tron LP533SGT
 MY 2011-2012 Vac-Tron AIR555SDT
 MY 2016-2018 Vac-Tron AIR573SDT
 MY 2019 Vac-Tron AIRSDT
 MY 2012 Vac-Tron CS350GT
 MY 2021 Vermeer CS418B
 MY 2012-2016 Vac-Tron CS500DT
 MY 2011-2015 Vac-Tron CS500GT
 MY 2012 Vac-Tron LP550SDT
 MY 2011-2013 Vac-Tron LP555DT
 MY 2009-2013 Vac-Tron LP555SDT
 MY 2016 Vac-Tron LP573GT
 MY 2015-2019 Vac-Tron LP573SDT
 MY 2015-2018 Vac-Tron LP573SGT
 MY 2016-2021 McLaughlin CS418B
 MY 2015-2019 McLaughlin V25G
 MY 2014-2020 McLaughlin VX30
 MY 2014-2019 McLaughlin VX30G
 MY 2014-2021 McLaughlin VX50
 MY 2008 McLaughlin V250
 MY 2013-2014 McLaughlin V500LEG
 MY 2012-2014 McLaughlin V500LELT
 MY 2012-2014 McLaughlin V500LELTHD
 MY 2007 McLaughlin V500LT

III. Noncompliance

    Vermeer explains that the noncompliance is that the subject 
trailers are not equipped with vehicle placards as required by 
paragraph S4.3.5 of FMVSS No. 110.

IV. Rule Requirements

    Paragraph S4.3.5 of FMVSS No. 110 includes the requirements 
relevant to this petition. Each trailer, except for an incomplete 
vehicle, must show the information specified in S4.3 (c) through (g) 
and may show the information specified in paragraphs S4.3 (h) and (i), 
on a placard permanently affixed proximate to the certification label 
specified in 49 CFR part 567. Additionally, each trailer must on its 
placard contain a cargo capacity statement expressed as ``The weight of 
cargo should never exceed XXX kilograms or XXX pounds'' in the same 
location on the placard specified for the ``vehicle capacity weight'' 
statement required by this standard. The information specified in 
paragraph S4.3 (e) shall be shown on both the vehicle placard and on 
the tire inflation pressure label (if such a label is affixed to 
provide the information specified in S4.3 (c), (d), (h), and (i)) in 
the format and color scheme set forth in Figures 1 and 2.

V. Summary of Vermeer's Petition

    The following views and arguments presented in this section, ``V. 
Summary of Vermeer's Petition,'' are the views and arguments provided 
by Vermeer. They have not been evaluated by the Agency and do not 
reflect the views of the Agency. Vermeer describes the subject 
noncompliance and contends that the noncompliance is inconsequential as 
it relates to motor vehicle safety.
    Vermeer provided background information about the subject trailers 
to further explain why it believes the subject noncompliance is

[[Page 36579]]

inconsequential to safety. Vermeer says that the subject trailers are 
``used by professional construction companies, not by the general 
public.'' In support, Vermeer cited several decisions NHTSA has 
published in the past regarding consideration in evaluating 
inconsequential noncompliance petitions. Vermeer quotes NHTSA as saying 
that ``the issue to consider is the consequence to an occupant who is 
exposed to the consequence of that noncompliance'' \1\ and that NHTSA 
also considers the ``specific facts before it in a particular 
petition'' \2\ in addition to ``whether an occupant who is affected by 
the noncompliance is likely to be exposed to a significantly greater 
risk than an occupant in a compliant vehicle [emphasis added by 
Vermeer].'' \3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See General Motors, LLC, Denial of Petition for Decision of 
Inconsequential Noncompliance, 85 FR 71713 (Nov. 10, 2020); see also 
General Motors Corp.; Ruling on Petition for Determination of 
Inconsequential Noncompliance, 69 FR 19897 (Apr. 14, 2004).
    \2\ See BMW of North America, LLC; Jaguar Land Rover North 
America, LLC; and Autoliv, Inc.; Decisions of Petitions for 
Inconsequential Noncompliance, 84 FR 19994 (May 7, 2019) (citing 
General Motors, LLC., Grant of Petition for Decision of 
Inconsequential Noncompliance, 81 FR 92963 (Dec. 20, 2016)).
    \3\ See Cosco Inc.; Denial of Application of Inconsequential 
Noncompliance, 64 FR 29408 (Jun. 1, 1999).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to Vermeer, [t]he purpose of the tire placard is 
informational and not a substantive performance standard, and the 
missing information is readily available to operators from other 
sources.'' Vermeer notes that along with the required information being 
readily available in the owner's manual, the missing information from 
the tire placard can also be found on the tire sidewalls and rims 
installed on the subject trailers. Vermeer also notes that another 
source of the missing information would be MyVermeer.com.
    Vermeer observes that NHTSA has previously granted 
inconsequentiality petitions that pertain to a similar noncompliance as 
the subject petition. These include:
     See Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision 
of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 84 FR 25118 (May 30, 2019);
     See General Motors, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of 
Inconsequential Noncompliance, 84 FR 25117 (May 30, 2019);
     See Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision 
of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 82 FR 5640 (January 18, 2017);
     See Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Grant of Petition 
for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 81 FR 88728 (December 8, 
2016);
     See Volkswagen Group of America, Grant of Petition for 
Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 81 FR 28935 (May 10, 2016);
     See Chrysler Group, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of 
Inconsequential Noncompliance, 81 FR 30607 (May 17, 2016);
     See BMW of North America, LLC, Grant of Petition for 
Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 78 FR 76408 (December 17, 
2013);
     See Chrysler Group, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of 
Inconsequential Noncompliance, 78 FR 38443 (June 26, 2013); and
     See Hyundai-Kia America Technical Center, Inc., Grant of 
Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 78 FR 38445 
(June 26, 2013).
    Vermeer emphasized that the operators of the subject trailers 
``would be experienced with and knowledgeable about these trailers.'' 
Vermeer says that the granting of an inconsequentiality petition 
submitted by Chrysler Group supports this assertion.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Chrysler Group, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of 
Inconsequential Noncompliance; 81 FR 30607 (May 17, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Last, Vermeer contends that the subject trailers meet all of the 
other requirements with FMVSS No. 110 and that Vermeer ``is not aware 
of any complaints, claims, or incidents related to the subject 
noncompliance.''
    Vermeer concludes that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential 
as it relates to motor vehicle safety and that its petition to be 
exempted from providing notification of the noncompliance, as required 
by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the noncompliance, as required by 
49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
    NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a 
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers 
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively, 
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance 
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on 
this petition only applies to the subject trailers that Vermeer no 
longer controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance 
existed.
    However, any decision on this petition does not relieve vehicle 
distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for 
sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate 
commerce of the noncompliant trailers under their control after Vermeer 
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.

(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at 49 
CFR 1.95 and 501.8)

Otto G. Matheke, III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2022-13078 Filed 6-16-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P