Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0161-0102
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2005-10-21T04:00Z

CONTACT
REPORT
From:
Tom
Holloway
Date
of
Contact:
July
18
and
22;
August
2
and
21;
and
September
4
and
18,
2002
Company/
Agency:
Eastman
Kodak
Co.
­
Kodak
Park
1669
Lake
Avenue
Rochester,
NY
14652
Telephone
Number:
(
585)
477
­
9881
Person
Contacted:
Greg
Moeller
CONTACT
SUMMARY:
Called
Tracey
Karatas
(
585­
477­
5992)
on
July
18
regarding
Kodak's
Buffalo
Road
plant;
left
message.
Greg
Moeller
returned
call
for
Ms.
Karatas
on
July
22.
He
said
that
they
have
one
coater
at
the
Kodak
Park
plant
which
makes
magnetic
tape,
but
they
also
make
other
products
on
that
line.
He
will
contact
me
within
the
next
2
days
to
provide
more
information.
He
needs
to
check
with
someone
to
see
if
he
can
get
emissions
data
for
just
magnetic
tape.

Received
message
from
Mr.
Moeller
on
August
2.
Called
Mr.
Moeller
back
same
day;
he
said
that
they
have
a
magnetic
tape
operation
at
the
Kodak
Park
plant
using
an
existing
coating
machine.
They
manufacture
Advantix
film
with
a
coating,
which
qualifies
as
magnetic
tape.
The
new
occupants
of
the
Buffalo
Road
plant
probably
don't
do
magnetic
tape
since
Kodak
didn't
sell
the
equipment
along
with
the
building.
He
said
that
he
should
have
emissions
data
for
the
Kodak
Park
plant
by
next
week
and
will
call
me
then
to
talk
about
it.
He
will
also
ask
around
about
the
Buffalo
Road
plant
with
Kodak
people
who
used
to
work
there.
He
was
not
aware
of
any
other
magnetic
tape
operations
at
Kodak.

Mr.
Moeller
called
me
back
on
August
21.
He
said
that
the
Buffalo
Road
operation
stopped
about
5
to
7
years
ago.
Kodak
still
leases
the
space,
but
there
are
no
magnetic
tape
operations
there.
The
bulk
of
Kodak's
manufacturing
in
Rochester,
NY
is
at
the
Kodak
Park
plant.
They
make
one
magnetic
tape
product
there,
coating
a
magnetic
particle.
The
notifications
for
this
operation
have
been
done.
They
have
split
out
the
HAP
emissions
for
the
coater.
The
organic
HAP
emissions
in
2001
are
8,500
pounds,
made
up
mostly
of
toluene
and
methyl
ethyl
ketone.
There
is
no
chromium.
The
product
is
coated
with
a
dilute
layer,
not
like
audio
or
videotape.
He
said
that
it
was
meant
to
be
exempted,
but
it
"
wasn't
de
minimis
enough."
On
August
27,
he
emailed
emission
estimates
of
organic
HAP
(
8,500
pounds),
metal
HAP
(
0.004
pounds
cobalt),
and
hydrogen
chloride
(
70
pounds).

Called
Mr.
Moeller
on
September
4
to
request
information
for
risk
test.
I
e­
mailed
the
list
of
information
on
same
day.
Mr.
Moeller
said
that
he
would
check
around
and
get
the
information.
I
requested
that
he
provide
any
information
within
the
next
2
weeks.
Mr.
Moeller
called
me
back
2
on
September
18.
He
said
that
he
would
e­
mail
me
a
table
with
the
required
information.
I
received
the
e­
mail
on
September
26.