Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0517-19233
Agency: epa
Document Type: Rule
Title: Updating Cross-References for the Oklahoma State Implementation Plan
Posted Date: 2011-03-04T05:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11963-11965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4907]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0517; FRL-9275-7]

Updating Cross-References for the Oklahoma State Implementation 
Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this rule, EPA is making a minor correction to the final 
rule titled, ``Limitation of Approval of Prevention of Significant 
Deterioration Provisions Concerning Greenhouse Gas Emitting-Sources in 
State Implementation Plans'' to correct the regulatory text related to 
Oklahoma's State Implementation Plan (SIP). Region 6 approved revisions 
to the Oklahoma SIP that recodified the regulations. This approved 
recodification took effect on December 27, 2010. This rule updates 
cross-references in the regulatory text in light of this 
recodification.

DATES: Effective Date: These correcting amendments are effective on 
March 4, 2011.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under 
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0517. All documents in the docket are 
listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the 
index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential 
business information or other information whose disclosure is 
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted 
material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly 
available docket materials are available either electronically in 
http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA Docket Center 
EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, 
DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the 
Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone

[[Page 11964]]

number for the EPA Docket Center is (202) 566-1742.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael S. Brooks, U.S. EPA, Office of 
Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Policy Division, C504-
05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone number (919) 541-3539, 
e-mail address: brooks.michaels@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    On December 30, 2010, EPA published a final rule titled, 
``Limitation of Approval of Prevention of Significant Deterioration 
Provisions Concerning Greenhouse Gas Emitting-Sources in State 
Implementation Plans'' (SIP Narrowing Rule) (75 FR 82536). This rule 
was signed on December 23, 2010. This final rule narrowed EPA's 
previous approval of SIP Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) 
programs in 24 states that apply to GHG-emitting sources. Specifically, 
in that rule EPA withdrew its previous approval of those programs to 
the extent they applied PSD to GHG-emitting sources below the 
thresholds in the final Tailoring Rule, which EPA promulgated by 
Federal Register notice dated June 3, 2010.
    For a detailed description of the rule titled, ``Limitation of 
Approval of Prevention of Significant Deterioration Provisions 
Concerning Greenhouse Gas Emitting-Sources in State Implementation 
Plans,'' please see the rulemaking action which is available in the 
Federal Register at (75 FR 82536).

II. Why are the corrections needed?

    In the SIP Narrowing Rule, EPA amended its approval of Oklahoma's 
SIP in 40 CFR 52.1929 by adding provision 40 CFR 52.1929(c), in which 
it cross-referenced specific provisions of Oklahoma's approved state 
PSD program.
    Separately, EPA Region 6 approved revisions to the Oklahoma SIP 
that recodified the regulations, including the provisions that were 
cross-referenced by the aforementioned SIP Narrowing Rule. This 
approved recodification took effect on December 27, 2010, in between 
the dates the SIP Narrowing Rule was signed and published. As a result, 
the regulatory text within the SIP Narrowing Rule related to the 
Oklahoma SIP is no longer accurate as the SIP provisions listed in the 
SIP Narrowing Rule no longer cross-reference to the portions of the 
state PSD program. Therefore, EPA is correcting this error.

III. What is the rulemaking procedure?

    The EPA is issuing this final rule without prior proposal or the 
opportunity for public comment because EPA finds that it is unnecessary 
and not in the public interest to provide such notice and opportunity 
for comment. Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 
U.S.C. 553(b)(B), provides that when an Agency for good cause finds 
that notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary, or 
contrary to public interest, the Agency may issue a rule without 
providing notice and an opportunity to comment. Section 307(d)(1) of 
the Clean Air Act (CAA), among other things, further provides that CAA 
subsection 307(d) does not apply when EPA has made a good cause finding 
pursuant to subparagraph (B) of APA subsection 553(b). (See 42 U.S.C. 
7607(d)(1).) In this rule, EPA finds that it is unnecessary and would 
serve no useful purpose for EPA to provide an opportunity for public 
comment because the changes merely correct minor, inadvertent, and 
nonsubstantive errors. As explained above, the correction to 40 CFR 
52.1929(c)(4)(iii) corrects minor, inadvertent errors in the regulatory 
text. For these reasons, EPA finds pursuant to APA section 553 that 
good cause exists to promulgate this final rule without publishing 
notice of a proposed rule or providing an opportunity for public 
comment.
    Section 553(d)(3) also allows an agency, upon a finding of good 
cause, to make a rule effective immediately. Because this action 
corrects minor, inadvertent errors and helps to clarify requirements in 
the underlying rules, EPA finds good cause exists to make these 
corrections effective immediately.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action only corrects minor, inadvertent and nonsubstantive 
errors. For that reason, this rule: Is not subject to review by the 
Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 Regulatory 
Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); is not a ``major 
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2); and does not impose an 
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Because EPA found that 
for this action it is unnecessary to issue a proposed rule and invite 
public comment, this action is also not subject to the regulatory 
flexibility provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 
et seq.), or to sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform 
Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). In addition, this action does not 
significantly or uniquely affect small governments or impose a 
significant intergovernmental mandate, as described in sections 203 and 
204 of the UMRA.
    The corrections do not have substantial direct effects on the 
States, or on the relationship between the national government and the 
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism (64 FR 43255; August 10, 1999).
    This action also does not significantly or uniquely affect the 
communities of Tribal governments, as specified in Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The corrections also are not subject to 
Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health 
and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) because this action is 
not economically significant.
    The corrections are not subject to Executive Order 13211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because this action is 
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
    The corrections do not involve changes to technical standards 
related to test methods or monitoring methods; thus, the requirements 
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272) do not apply.
    The corrections also do not involve special consideration of 
environmental justice-related issues as required by Executive Order 
12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority 
Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), 
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency 
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy 
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller 
General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing 
this final action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, 
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the 
U.S. prior to publication of this action in the Federal Register. This 
action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). The final 
rule will be effective on March 4, 2011.
    The EPA's compliance with the above statutes and Executive Orders 
for the

[[Page 11965]]

underlying rules is discussed in section VII of the rule titled, 
``Limitation of Approval of Prevention of Significant Deterioration 
Provisions Concerning Greenhouse Gas Emitting-Sources in State 
Implementation Plans'' at 75 FR 82549.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, 
Carbon dioxide, Carbon dioxide equivalents, Environmental protection, 
Greenhouse gases, Hydrofluorocarbons, Intergovernmental relations, 
Incorporation by reference, Methane, Nitrous oxide, Perfluorocarbons, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur hexafluoride.

    Dated: February 24, 2011.
Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40, chapter I of the 
Code of Federal Regulations is amended as set forth below.

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.

Subpart LL--Oklahoma

0
2. Section 52.1929 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(4)(iii) to read 
as follows:

Sec.  52.1929  Significant deterioration of air quality.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (4) * * *
    (iii) The term emissions increase shall mean that both a 
significant emissions increase (as calculated using the EPA-approved 
procedures in Oklahoma Air Pollution Control Regulation Title 252, 
Chapter 100, Subchapter 8, Part 7) and a significant net emissions 
increase (as defined in the EPA-approved Oklahoma Air Pollution Control 
Regulation 252:100-8-31, definitions for ``net emissions increase'' and 
``significant'' occur. For the pollutant GHGs, an emissions increase 
shall be based on tpy CO2e, and shall be calculated assuming 
the pollutant GHGs is a regulated NSR pollutant, and ``significant'' is 
defined as 75,000 tpy CO2e instead of applying the value in 
252:100-8-31 of the EPA-approved definition for ``significant'' of 
Oklahoma's Air Pollution Control Regulations.

[FR Doc. 2011-4907 Filed 3-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P