Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0076-0398
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2005-06-13T04:00Z

Lydia
Wegman/
RTP/
USEPA/
US@
E
PA
05/
03/
2005
05:
36
PM
To
Kathy
Kaufman/
RTP/
USEPA/
US@
EPA
cc
Subject
Fw:
Response
to
questions
on
BART
non­
EGU
data
spreadsheet
­­­­­
Forwarded
by
Lydia
Wegman/
RTP/
USEPA/
US
on
05/
03/
2005
05:
36
PM
­­­­­

Jeff
Holmstead/
DC/
USE
PA/
US
To
afraas@
omb.
eop.
gov
05/
02/
2005
09:
31
cc
PM
Bill
Wehrum
Subject
Fw:
Response
to
questions
on
BART
non­
EGU
data
spreadsheet
Here
is
the
first
of
2
emails
containing
additional
information
related
to
BART.

­­­­­
Forwarded
by
Jeff
Holmstead/
DC/
USEPA/
US
on
05/
02/
2005
09:
26
PM
­­­­­

Larry
Sorrels/
RTP/
USEP
A/
US
To
Bill
Wehrum/
DC/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Jeff
04/
28/
2005
12:
50
Holmstead/
DC/
USEPA/
US@
EPA
PM
cc
Subject
Response
to
questions
on
BART
non­
EGU
data
spreadsheet
Bill,

I
have
the
following
responses
to
your
3
questions
from
last
night's
phone
message:

1)
All
of
the
unit
emissions
in
the
non­
EGU
data
spreadsheet
I
sent
you
on
Tuesday
are
actual,
not
potential,
emissions.
They
are
from
the
RPO
responses
to
the
ICR
we
sent
out
last
year
after
the
BART
proposal.

2)
Attached
is
the
same
spreadsheet
but
with
the
rankings
in
order
of
NOx
emissions
by
unit,
from
highest
to
lowest.

(
See
attached
file:
NonEGUBARTemissionsdatabaselineNOxranked42805.
xls)

3)
Attached
is
the
same
spreadsheet
but
with
the
emission
data
shown
by
facility,
with
facility
names
in
alphabetical
order.

(
See
attached
file:
NonEGUBARTemissionsdatabaselinefacilitylevel42805.
xls)

Let
me
know
if
you
have
any
questions
regarding
this
email.
Thank
you.

Larry
Sorrels
Economist
US
EPA/
OAQPS
C504­
02
RTP,
NC
27711
(
919)
541­
5041
fax:
(
919)
541­
5489