Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0225-0186
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2008-03-12T04:00Z

Elizabeth Kopits/DC/USEPA/US

03/06/2008 10:52 AM

	

To

Nathalie Simon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov,
Robert_C._Johansson@omb.eop.gov

cc

Al McGartland/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Bryan Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Cynthia
Morgan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia
Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA,
simon.nathalie@epa.gov, Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

Re: NCEE comments on Ozone RIA (version submitted to OMB 2/29-3/5)

OK, thanks!

Nathalie Simon/DC/USEPA/US

03/06/2008 10:50 AM

	

To

Elizabeth Kopits/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Al McGartland/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Bryan Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Cynthia
Morgan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia
Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA,
simon.nathalie@epa.gov, Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

Re: NCEE comments on Ozone RIA (version submitted to OMB 2/29-3/5)

Hi Elizabeth --

It is my understanding that given the concurrent nature of the review,
we should share our comments with OMB as well.

Thanks.

Nathalie

***************************************************************

Nathalie B. Simon,  PhD

Associate Director 

National Center for Environmental Economics

USEPA, Mail Code 1809T

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC  20460

ph:  (202) 566-2347  fax:  (202)566-2363

**************************************************************

Elizabeth Kopits/DC/USEPA/US

03/06/2008 10:46 AM

	

To

Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Al McGartland/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Cynthia Morgan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Janet
Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA,
simon.nathalie@epa.gov, Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Bryan
Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

NCEE comments on Ozone RIA (version submitted to OMB 2/29-3/5)

Hi Ron, 

Here are NCEE's comments on the Ozone RIA (the most recent version of
each chapter that has been sent to OMB).  The only chapter we have not
read yet is Appendix 9B.  We will try to get our comments on that to you
by early afternoon.  Also, our comments on the hybrid extrapolated cost
methodology still reflect our views in yesterday's email exchange, since
we have not had a chance to discuss your afternoon email yet.  We will
get back to you on that shortly as well. 

Since we are reviewing concurrently with OMB at this point, I assume it
is OK to send these to Heidi and Rob too?

Thanks,

Elizabeth and Cynthia.