Document ID: EPA-HQ-OECA-2005-0003-0005
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2005-08-23T04:00Z

SF­
83
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
NESHAP
for
Miscellaneous
Metal
Parts
and
Products
(
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
MMMM)
(
Renewal)

1.
Identification
of
the
Information
Collection
1(
a)
Title
of
the
Information
Collection
NESHAP
for
Miscellaneous
Metal
Parts
and
Products
(
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
MMMM)
(
Renewal).

1(
b)
Short
Characterization/
Abstract
The
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
(
NESHAP)
for
the
regulations
at
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
MMMM
were
proposed
on
August
13,
2002
and
promulgated
on
January
2,
2004.
These
regulations
apply
to
each
miscellaneous
metal
parts
and
products
surface
coating
operations,
and
associated
equipment
or
containers
used
for
mixing,
conveying,
storage,
or
waste
at
existing
facilities
and
new
facilities.
New
facilities
include
those
that
commenced
construction
or
reconstruction
after
the
date
of
proposal.
This
information
is
being
collected
to
assure
compliance
with
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
MMMM.

In
general,
all
NESHAP
standards
require
initial
notifications,
performance
tests,
and
periodic
reports.
Owners
or
operators
are
also
required
to
maintain
records
of
the
occurrence
and
duration
of
any
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
in
the
operation
of
an
affected
facility,
or
any
period
during
which
the
monitoring
system
is
inoperative.
These
notifications,
reports,
and
records
are
essential
in
determining
compliance
and
are
required
of
all
sources
subject
to
NESHAP
standards.

Any
owner
or
operator
subject
to
the
provisions
of
this
part
shall
maintain
a
file
of
these
documents,
and
retain
the
file
for
at
least
five
years
following
the
date
of
such
notifications,
reports,
and
records.
All
reports
are
sent
to
the
delegated
state
or
local
authority.
In
the
event
that
there
is
no
such
delegated
authority,
the
reports
are
sent
directly
to
the
United
States
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA)
regional
office.

Approximately
1635
respondents
are
currently
subject
to
the
regulation,
and
it
is
estimated
that
45
additional
respondent
will
become
subject
to
the
regulation
in
each
of
the
next
three
years.

OMB
approved
the
currently
active
ICR
without
any
"
Terms
of
Clearance."
2
2.
Need
for
and
Use
of
the
Collection
2(
a)
Need/
Authority
for
the
Collection
The
EPA
is
charged
under
Section
112
of
the
Clean
Air
Act,
as
amended,
to
establish
standards
of
performance
for
each
category
or
subcategory
of
major
sources
and
area
sources
of
hazardous
air
pollutants.
These
standards
are
applicable
to
new
or
existing
sources
of
hazardous
air
pollutants
and
shall
require
the
maximum
degree
of
emission
reduction.
In
addition,
Section
114(
a)
states
that
the
Administrator
may
require
any
owner
or
operator
subject
to
any
requirement
of
this
Act
to:

(
A)
Establish
and
maintain
such
records;
(
B)
make
such
reports;
(
C)
install,
use,
and
maintain
such
monitoring
equipment,
and
use
such
audit
procedures,
or
methods;
(
D)
sample
such
emissions
(
in
accordance
with
such
procedures
or
methods,
at
such
locations,
at
such
intervals,
during
such
periods,
and
in
such
manner
as
the
Administrator
shall
prescribe);
(
E)
keep
records
on
control
equipment
parameters,
production
variables
or
other
indirect
data
when
direct
monitoring
of
emissions
is
impractical;
(
F)
submit
compliance
certifications
in
accordance
with
Section
114(
a)(
3);
and
(
G)
provide
such
other
information
as
the
Administrator
may
reasonably
require.

The
predominant
HAPs
emitted
from
miscellaneous
metal
parts
and
products
surface
coating
operations
include
xylenes,
toluene,
methyl
ethyl
ketone,
phenol,
and
cresols/
cresylic
acid.
In
the
Administrator's
judgement,
the
pollutants
emitted
from
miscellaneous
metal
parts
and
products
surface
coating
operations
cause
or
contribute
to
air
pollution
that
may
reasonably
be
anticipated
to
endanger
public
health
or
welfare.
Therefore,
the
NESHAP
for
this
source
category
were
promulgated
at
40
CFR
Part
63,
Subpart
MMMM.

2(
b)
Practical
Utility/
Users
of
the
Data
The
control
of
emissions
of
HAP
from
miscellaneous
metal
parts
and
products
surface
coating
operations
requires
not
only
the
installation
of
properly
designed
equipment,
but
also
the
operation
and
maintenance
of
that
equipment.
Emissions
of
HAP
from
miscellaneous
metal
parts
and
products
surface
coating
operations
result
from
the
coating
operations,
and
associated
equipment
or
containers
used
for
mixing,
conveying,
storage,
or
waste.
These
standards
rely
on
compliant
coatings,
emission
capture
systems,
add­
on
controls,
and
work
practice
standards.
The
required
notifications
are
used
to
inform
the
Agency
or
delegated
authority
when
a
source
becomes
subject
to
the
standard.
The
reviewing
authority
may
then
inspect
the
source
to
check
if
the
pollution
control
devices
are
properly
installed
and
operated
and
the
regulations
are
being
met.
Performance
test
reports
are
needed
as
these
are
the
Agency's
record
of
a
source's
initial
capability
to
comply
with
the
emission
standard,
and
serve
as
a
record
of
the
operating
conditions
3
under
which
compliance
was
achieved.
The
semiannual
reports
are
used
for
problem
identification,
as
a
check
on
source
operation
and
maintenance,
and
for
compliance
determinations.
The
information
generated
by
the
monitoring,
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
described
in
this
ICR
is
used
by
the
Agency
to
ensure
that
facilities
affected
by
the
NESHAP
continue
to
operate
the
control
equipment
in
compliance
with
the
regulation.
Adequate
monitoring,
recordkeeping,
and
reporting
are
necessary
to
ensure
compliance
on
an
on­
going
basis
with
these
standards,
as
required
by
the
Clean
Air
Act.
The
information
collected
from
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
also
is
used
for
targeting
inspections,
and
is
of
sufficient
quality
to
be
used
as
evidence
in
court.

3.
Nonduplication,
Consultations,
and
Other
Collection
Criteria
The
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requested
is
required
under
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
MMMM.

3(
a)
Nonduplication
If
the
subject
standards
have
not
been
delegated,
the
information
is
sent
directly
to
the
appropriate
EPA
regional
office.
Otherwise,
the
information
is
sent
directly
to
the
delegated
state
or
local
agency.
If
a
state
or
local
agency
has
adopted
its
own
similar
standards
to
implement
the
Federal
standards,
a
copy
of
the
report
submitted
to
the
state
or
local
agency
can
be
sent
to
the
Administrator
in
lieu
of
the
report
required
by
the
Federal
standards.
Therefore,
no
duplication
exists.

3(
b)
Public
Notice
Required
Prior
to
ICR
Submission
to
OMB
An
announcement
of
a
public
comment
period
for
the
renewal
of
this
ICR
was
published
in
the
Federal
Register
on
March
8,
2005,
(
70
FR
11239).
EPA
received
a
request
that
burden
and
cost
estimates
be
revised
to
include
the
higher
burden
and
cost
incurred
by
the
ten
magnet
wire
facilities
nationwide.
EPA
discussed
the
comment
with
magnet
wire
industry
representatives
to
obtain
greater
detail.
Magnet
wire
facilities
have
approximately
20
times
as
many
processes
as
other
facilities
subject
to
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
MMMM.
A
magnet
wire
facility
typically
uses
process
ovens
as
a
control
device
to
combust
coating
residuals,
increasing
energy
efficiency.
Based
on
our
discussion
with
industry
representatives,
we
have
revised
Tables
2b
and
2c
to
increase
certain
magnet
wire
facility
burden
and
costs
by
a
factor
of
20,
and
have
revised
capital/
startup
and
O&
M
costs
to
reflect
the
facilities'
need
to
install
and
maintain
monitoring
systems
for
their
ovens,
and
are
providing
a
written
response
to
comments
received.

3(
c)
Consultations
After
reviewing
our
internal
data
sources
and
industry
experts,
we
have
determined
that
additional
consultations
with
industry
are
inappropriate
for
this
ICR
renewal.
4
Estimates
of
industry
size,
growth
rate,
and
burden
were
developed
with
extensive
participation
and
consultation
with
miscellaneous
metals
surface
coating
industry
representatives
during
recent
rulemaking
for
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
MMMM.
EPA
believes
that
these
estimates
remain
valid,
and
are
the
best
information
available.
Burden
estimates
that
apply
specifically
to
magnet
wire
facilities
have
been
revised
to
reflect
industry
comments
on
this
ICR.
(
See
Section
3(
b),
Public
Notice
Required
Prior
to
ICR
Submission
to
OMB.)
The
Agency
currently
collects
the
minimum
amount
of
information
necessary
to
ensure
compliance
with
the
standard.

3(
d)
Effects
of
Less
Frequent
Collection
Less
frequent
information
collection
would
decrease
the
margin
of
assurance
that
facilities
are
continuing
to
meet
the
required
standards.
Requirements
for
information
gathering
and
recordkeeping
are
useful
techniques
to
ensure
that
good
operation
and
maintenance
practices
are
applied
and
emission
limitations
are
met.
If
the
information
required
by
these
standards
was
collected
less
frequently,
the
likelihood
of
detecting
poor
operation
and
maintenance
of
control
equipment
and
noncompliance
would
decrease.

3(
e)
General
Guidelines
None
of
these
reporting
or
recordkeeping
requirements
violate
any
of
the
regulations
established
by
OMB
in
5
CFR
1320.5.

3(
f)
Confidentiality
Any
information
submitted
to
the
Agency
for
which
a
claim
of
confidentiality
is
made
will
be
safeguarded
according
to
the
Agency
policies
set
forth
in
Title
40,
chapter
1,
part
2,
subpart
B
­
Confidentiality
of
Business
Information
(
see
40
CFR
2;
41
FR
36902,
September
1,
1976;
amended
by
43
FR
40000,
September
8,
1978;
43
FR
42251,
September
20,
1978;
44
FR
17674,
March
23,
1979).

3(
g)
Sensitive
Questions
None
of
the
reporting
or
recordkeeping
requirements
contain
sensitive
questions.

4.
The
Respondents
and
the
Information
Requested
4(
a)
Respondents/
SIC
Codes
Respondents
of
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
are
owners
or
operators
of
facilities
that
perform
surface
coating
of
miscellaneous
metal
parts
and
products
and
that
are
classified
as
major
sources
under
section
112
of
the
Clean
Air
Act.
In
general,
facilities
that
coat
miscellaneous
metal
parts
and
products
are
covered
under
the
North
American
Industrial
PRODUCT
EXAMPLES
AND
CORRESPONDING
NAICS
AND
SIC
CODES
FOR
MISCELLANEOUS
METAL
PARTS
AND
PRODUCTS
SOURCE
CATEGORY
5
Classification
System
(
NAICS)
and
Standard
Industrial
Classification
(
SIC)
codes
are
listed
in
the
table
below.
However,
facilities
classified
under
other
NAICS
or
SIC
codes
may
be
subject
to
the
proposed
standard
if
they
meet
the
applicability
criteria.
Not
all
facilities
classified
under
the
NAICS
and
SIC
codes
in
the
table
will
be
subject
to
the
proposed
standard
because
some
of
the
classifications
cover
products
outside
the
scope
of
the
NESHAP
for
miscellaneous
metal
parts
and
products.

Segment
Description
Example
Products
Example
SIC
Example
NAICS
Aerospace
Equipment
Engines
and
Turbines,
Aircraft
Engines
and
Engine
Parts,
Aircraft
Parts
and
Auxiliary
Equipment
Aircraft
Engines,
Aircraft
Parts,
Aerospace
Ground
Equipment
3724,
3728,
376X,
336413,
336414,
336415,
54171
Automobile
Parts
Motor
Vehicles
and
Motor
Vehicle
Equipment
Engine
Parts,
Vehicle
Parts
and
Accessories,
Brakes,
Axles,
etc.
3711,
3713,
3714,
3292,
3429,
3465,
3694,
3829
335312,
336111,
336211,
336312,
33632,
33633,
33634,
33637,
336399
Extruded
Aluminum
Rolling,
Drawing,
and
Extruding
of
Nonferrous
Metals
Extruded
Aluminum,
Architectural
Components,
Coils,
Rod,
and
Tubes
3354,
3365,
3442,
3446
331316,
331524,
332321,
332323
Heavy
Equipment
Farm
and
Garden
Machinery
and
Equipment,
Construction
Machinery
and
Equipment
Tractors,
Earth
moving
machinery
3511,
3519,
352X,
353X,
33312,
333611,
333618
Job
Shops
Coat
Products
by
Job
and
Customer
Rather
than
Coating
the
One
Product
or
Group
of
Products
Any
of
the
Products
from
the
MMPP
Segments
3441,
3471,
3499,
3999
332312,
332722,
332813,
332991,
332999,
334119,
336413,
339999
Large
Trucks
and
Buses
Motor
Vehicles
and
Motor
Vehicle
Equipment
Large
Trucks,
Buses
3711,
3713,
3716
33612,
336211
Magnet
Wire
Rolling,
Drawing,
and
Extruding
of
Nonferrous
Metal
Wire
Magnet
Wire
3351,
3357
331319,
331422,
335929
Metal
Buildings
Prefabricated
Metal
Buildings
and
Components
Prefabricated
Metal:
Buildings,
Carports,
Docks,
Dwellings,
Greenhouses,
Panels
for
Buildings
3448
332311
Segment
Description
Example
Products
Example
SIC
Example
NAICS
6
Metal
Containers
Metal
Shipping
Barrels,
Drums,
Kegs,
and
Pails
Drums,
Kegs,
Pails,
Shipping
Containers
2655,
3089,
3325,
3412,
3443,
5085
33242,
81131,
322214,
326199,
331513,
332439
Metal
Pipe
and
Foundry
Primary
Metal
Industries
Plate,
Tube,
Rods,
Nails,
Spikes,
etc.
331X,
332X,
336X,
3399
331111,
331513,
33121,
331221,
331511
Rail
Transportation
Transportation
Equipment
Brakes,
Engines,
Freight
Cars,
Locomotives
3731,
3743,
4011,
4741
33651,
336611,
482111
Recreational
Vehicles
Transportation
Equipment
Motorcycles,
Motor
Homes,
Semitrailers,
Truck
Trailers
3083,
3354,
3713,
3714,
3716,
375X,
3792
3369,
331316,
336991,
336211,
336112,
336213,
336214,
336399
Rubber
to
Metal
Products
Fabricated
Rubber
Products
(
applied
to
metal)
Engine
Mounts,
Rubberized
Tank
Tread,
Harmonic
Balancers
3061,
3069,
3479
326291,
326299
Structural
Steel
Fabricated
Structural
Metal
Products
Joists,
railway
bridge
sections,
highway
bridge
sections
3441,
3448
332311,
332312
Other
Transportation
Equipment
Transportation
Equipment
Not
Listed
Otherwise
Miscellaneous
Transportation
Related
Equipment
and
Parts
3711,
3519,
3714,
3715,
3795,
3621,
336212,
336999,
33635,
56121,
8111,
56211
4(
b)
Information
Requested
(
i)
Data
Items
All
data
in
this
ICR
that
is
recorded
and/
or
reported
is
required
by
40
CFR
Part
63,
Subpart
MMMM.

A
source
must
make
the
following
reports:

Notification
Reports
Requirement
Regulation
reference
Initial
Notification
63.3910(
b)

Notification
of
Compliance
Status
63.3910(
c)

Notification
of
construction
or
reconstruction
63.9(
b)

Notification
of
actual
date
of
initial
startup
63.9(
b)
Notification
Reports
7
Notification
of
intent
to
conduct
a
performance
test
63.7(
b);
63.9(
e);
63.3910(
a)

Periodic
reports
(
semiannual)
63.3920(
a)

statement
of
compliance
(
if
no
exceedances
occurred)
63.3920(
a)

average
monitoring
data
for
any
periods
where
exceedances
or
excursions
occur
63.3920(
a)

periods
of
monitoring
system
downtime
63.3920(
a)

results
of
any
performance
tests
63.3920(
b)

start­
up,
shutdown,
malfunction
reports
63.3920(
c)

A
source
must
maintain
the
following
records:

Recordkeeping
Five­
year
retention
of
records
63.10(
b)(
1)

Material
formulation
data
63.3930(
b)

Records
of
HAP
content
calculations
63.3930(
c)

Copies
of
Notifications
and
Reports
63.3930(
a)

Records
of
names
of
materials
used
63.3930(
d)

HAP
fractions
in
each
material
used
63.3930(
e)

Coating
solids
fraction
in
each
material
used
63.3930(
f)

Density
of
materials
used
63.3930(
g)

Documentation
of
waste
material
shipped
offsite
63.3930(
h)

Start­
up,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan/
records
63.6(
e)(
3);
63.3900(
c);
63.3930(
k)

Documentation
of
control
device
performance
tests
63.10(
b)(
2);
63.3930(
k)

Values
measured
by
continuous
monitoring
systems
63.3968
Monitoring
system
calibrations,
maintenance
63.3968
Periods
of
monitoring
system
failure/
shutdown
63.3968
8
Electronic
Reporting
Currently,
sources
are
using
monitoring
equipment
that
provides
parameter
data
in
an
automated
way,
e.
g.,
inlet
and
outlet
concentrations
when
determining
percent
efficiency.
Although
personnel
at
the
source
still
need
to
evaluate
the
data,
this
type
of
monitoring
equipment
has
significantly
reduced
the
burden
associated
with
monitoring
and
recordkeeping.
In
addition,
some
regulatory
agencies
are
setting
up
electronic
reporting
systems
to
allow
sources
to
report
electronically
which
is
reducing
the
reporting
burden.
However,
electronic
reporting
systems
are
still
not
widely
used
by
the
regulatory
agencies.
It
is
estimated
that
approximately
10%
of
the
respondents
use
electronic
reporting.

(
ii)
Respondent
Activities
Respondent
Activities
Read
instructions.

Install,
calibrate,
maintain,
and
operate
CPMS
for
capture
system
and
add­
on
control
device
efficiency
at
sources
using
these
to
comply
with
the
standard.

Perform
initial
performance
test,
Reference
Method
1,
1A,
2,
2A,
2C,
2D,
2F,
2G,
3,
3A,
3B,
4,
24,
25,
25A,
204,
204A,
204B,
204C,
204D,
204E,
204F
or
311
test
as
applicable,
and
repeat
performance
tests
if
necessary.

Write
the
notifications
and
reports
listed
above.

Enter
information
required
to
be
recorded
above.

Submit
the
required
reports
developing,
acquiring,
installing,
and
utilizing
technology
and
systems
for
the
purpose
of
collecting,
validating,
and
verifying
information.

Develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purpose
of
processing
and
maintaining
information.

Develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purpose
of
disclosing
and
providing
information.

Adjust
the
existing
ways
to
comply
with
any
previously
applicable
instructions
and
requirements.

Train
personnel
to
be
able
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information.

Transmit,
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.
9
5.
The
Information
Collected:
Agency
Activities,
Collection
Methodology,
and
Information
Management
5(
a)
Agency
Activities
EPA
conducts
the
following
activities
in
connection
with
the
acquisition,
analysis,
storage,
and
distribution
of
the
required
information.

Agency
Activities
Observe
initial
performance
tests
and
repeat
performance
tests
if
necessary.

Review
notifications
and
reports,
including
performance
test
reports,
and
excess
emissions
reports,
required
to
be
submitted
by
industry.

Audit
facility
records.

Input,
analyze,
and
maintain
data
in
the
Air
Facility
System
(
AFS).

5(
b)
Collection
Methodology
and
Management
Following
notification
of
startup,
the
reviewing
authority
might
inspect
the
source
to
determine
whether
the
pollution
control
devices
are
properly
installed
and
operated.
Performance
test
reports
are
used
by
the
Agency
to
discern
a
source's
initial
capability
to
comply
with
the
emission
standard,
and
note
the
operating
conditions
under
which
compliance
was
achieved.
Data
and
records
maintained
by
the
respondents
are
tabulated
and
published
for
use
in
compliance
and
enforcement
programs.
The
semiannual
reports
are
used
for
problem
identification,
as
a
check
on
source
operation
and
maintenance,
and
for
compliance
determinations.

Information
contained
in
the
reports
is
entered
into
AFS
which
is
operated
and
maintained
by
EPA's
Office
of
Compliance.
AFS
is
EPA's
database
for
the
collection,
maintenance,
and
retrieval
of
compliance
and
annual
emission
inventory
data
for
over
125,000
industrial
and
government­
owned
facilities.
EPA
uses
AFS
for
tracking
air
pollution
compliance
and
enforcement
by
local
and
state
regulatory
agencies,
and
EPA
regional
offices
and
EPA
headquarters.
EPA
and
its
delegated
Authorities
can
edit,
store,
retrieve
and
analyze
the
data.

The
records
required
by
this
regulation
must
be
retained
by
the
owner
or
operator
for
two
years.

5(
c)
Small
Entity
Flexibility
A
majority
of
the
respondents
are
large
entities
(
e.
g.,
large
businesses).
However,
the
impact
on
small
entities
(
i.
e.,
small
businesses)
was
taken
into
consideration
during
the
development
of
the
regulation.
Due
to
technical
considerations
involving
the
process
operations
10
and
the
types
of
control
equipment
employed
,
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
are
the
same
for
both
small
and
large
entities.
The
Agency
considers
these
requirements
the
minimum
needed
to
ensure
compliance
and,
therefore,
cannot
reduce
them
further
for
small
entities.
To
the
extent
that
larger
businesses
can
use
economies
of
scale
to
reduce
their
burden,
the
overall
burden
will
be
reduced.

5(
d)
Collection
Schedule
The
specific
frequency
for
each
information
collection
activity
within
this
request
is
shown
in
Tables
1a,
1b,
1c,
and
1d.
Annual
Respondent
Burden
and
Cost,
NESHAP
for
Miscellaneous
Metal
Parts
and
Products
(
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
MMMM).

6.
Estimating
the
Burden
and
Cost
of
the
Collection
Tables
1a,
1b,
1c,
and
1d
document
the
computation
of
individual
burdens
for
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
applicable
to
the
industry
for
each
of
the
subparts
included
in
this
ICR.
The
individual
burdens
are
expressed
under
standardized
headings
believed
to
be
consistent
with
the
concept
of
burden
under
the
Paperwork
Reduction
Act.
Where
appropriate,
specific
tasks
and
major
assumptions
have
been
identified.
Responses
to
this
information
collection
are
mandatory
under
40
CFR
part
60.747.

The
Agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to,
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
currently
valid
OMB
control
number.

6(
a)
Estimating
Respondent
Burden
The
average
annual
burden
to
industry
over
the
next
three
years
from
these
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
is
estimated
to
be
675,050
hours
(
Total
Labor
Hours
calculated
from
Tables
1a,
1b,
1c,
and
1d
as
follows).

Annual
burden
to
industry
Total
burden,
hours
Total
cost,
$

Year
31:
Table
1a
(
existing)
+
Table
1d
(
new)
240,465
19,412,425
Year
41:
Table
1b
(
existing)
+
Table
1d
(
new)
881,682
71,117,037
Year
51:
Table
1c
(
existing)
+
Table
1d
(
new)
903,003
72,898,253
Average
annual
industry
burden
and
cost
675,050
54,475,905
1
Years
3,
4,
and
5
refer
to
the
number
of
years
after
promulgation
of
the
rule.
11
These
hours
are
based
on
Agency
studies
and
background
documents
from
the
development
of
the
standards
or
test
methods,
Agency
knowledge
and
experience
with
the
NESHAP
program,
the
previously
approved
ICR,
and
any
comments
received.

6(
b)
Estimating
Respondent
Costs
(
i)
Estimating
Labor
Costs
This
ICR
uses
the
following
labor
rates:

Managerial
$
97.46
($
46.41
+
110%)
Technical
$
83.71
($
39.86
+
110%)
Clerical
$
42.55
($
20.26
+
110%)

These
rates
are
from
the
United
States
Department
of
Labor,
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics,
March
19,
2005,
"
Table
2.
Civilian
Workers,
by
occupational
and
industry
group."
The
rates
are
from
column
1,
"
Total
compensation."
The
rates
have
been
increased
by
110%
to
account
for
the
benefit
packages
available
to
those
employed
by
private
industry.

(
ii)
Estimating
Capital
and
Operation
and
Maintenance
Costs
The
type
of
industry
costs
associated
with
the
information
collection
activities
in
the
subject
standards
are
both
labor
costs
which
are
addressed
elsewhere
in
this
ICR
and
the
costs
associated
with
continuous
monitoring.
The
capital/
startup
costs
are
one
time
costs
when
a
facility
becomes
subject
to
the
regulation.
The
annual
operation
and
maintenance
costs
are
the
ongoing
costs
to
maintain
the
monitor(
s)
and
other
costs
such
as
photocopying
and
postage.

(
iii)
Capital/
Start­
up
vs.
Operation
and
Maintenance
(
O&
M)
Costs
Capital/
Startup
vs.
Operation
and
Maintenance
(
O&
M)
Costs
(
A)
Continuous
Monitoring
Device
(
B)
Capital/
Startu
p
Cost
for
One
Respondent
(
C)
Number
of
New
Respondents
(
D)
Total
Capital/
Startu
p
Cost
(
B
X
C)
(
E)
Annual
O&
M
Costs
for
One
Respondent
(
F)
Number
of
Respondents
with
O&
M
(
G)
Total
O&
M
(
E
X
F)

CPMS
$
166,667
101
$
1,666,667
$
50,000
10
$
500,000
1
There
are
10
magnet
wire
facilities
that
incur
a
capital/
startup
cost
of
approximately
$
500,000
each
by
the
4th
year
after
promulgation.
Other
facilities
are
expected
to
comply
with
the
standards
by
reformulating
their
coating
materials
rather
than
purchasing
add­
on
control
devices.

The
total
capital/
startup
costs
for
this
ICR
are
$
1,666,667.
This
is
the
total
of
column
D
in
the
above
table.
These
costs
are
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
14(
a),
Total
annualized
capital/
startup
costs.
12
The
total
operation
and
maintenance
(
O&
M)
costs
for
this
ICR
are
$
500,000.
This
is
the
total
of
column
G.
These
costs
are
shown
on
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
14(
b),
Total
annual
costs
(
O&
M).

The
total
respondent
costs
in
block
14
have
been
calculated
as
the
addition
of
the
capital/
startup
costs,
and
the
annual
operation
and
maintenance
costs.
The
average
annual
cost
for
capital/
startup
and
operation
and
maintenance
costs
to
industry
over
the
next
three
years
of
the
ICR
is
estimated
to
be
$
2,166,667.
This
cost
is
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
14(
c),
Total
annualized
cost
requested.
The
numbers
in
block
14
of
the
OMB
83­
I
form
are
rounded
to
show
the
cost
in
thousands
of
dollars.

6(
c)
Estimating
Agency
Burden
and
Cost
The
only
costs
to
the
Agency
are
those
costs
associated
with
analysis
of
the
reported
information.
EPA's
overall
compliance
and
enforcement
program
includes
activities
such
as
the
examination
of
records
maintained
by
the
respondents,
periodic
inspection
of
sources
of
emissions,
and
the
publication
and
distribution
of
collected
information.

The
average
annual
Agency
cost
during
the
three
years
of
the
ICR
is
estimated
to
be
$
1,608,425
(
calculated
from
Tables
2a,
2b,
and
2c
as
follows).

Annual
burden
to
Agency
Total
burden,
hours
Total
cost,
$

Year
31:
Table
2a
414
16,784
Year
41:
Table
2b
69,966
2,836,422
Year
51:
Table
2c
48,645
1,972,068
Average
annual
Agency
burden
and
cost
39,675
1,608,425
1
Years
3,4,
and
5
refer
to
the
number
of
years
after
promulgation
of
the
rule.

This
cost
is
based
on
the
average
hourly
labor
rate
as
follows:

Managerial
$
56.02
(
GS­
13,
Step
5,
$
35.01
x
1.6)
Technical
$
41.57
(
GS­
12,
Step
1,
$
25.98
x
1.6)
Clerical
$
22.50
(
GS­
6,
Step
3,
$
14.06
x
1.6)

These
rates
are
from
the
Office
of
Personnel
Management
(
OPM)
"
2004
General
Schedule"
which
excludes
locality
rates
of
pay.
Details
upon
which
this
estimate
is
based
appear
in
Tables
2a,
2b,
and
2c.
Annual
Agency
Burden
and
Cost,
NESHAP
for
Miscellaneous
Metal
Parts
and
Products
(
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
MMMM).
13
6(
d)
Estimating
the
Respondent
Universe
and
Total
Burden
and
Costs
Based
on
our
research
for
this
ICR,
approximately
1,590
existing
sources
are
currently
subject
to
the
standard.
It
is
estimated
that
an
additional
45
sources
per
year
will
become
subject
to
the
standard
in
each
of
the
next
three
years.

Number
of
respondents
is
calculated
using
the
following
table
which
addresses
the
three
years
covered
by
this
ICR.

Number
of
Respondents
Respondents
That
Submit
Reports
Respondents
That
Do
Not
Submit
Any
Reports
Year
(
A)
Number
of
New
Respondents
1
(
B)
Number
of
Existing
Respondents
(
C)
Number
of
Existing
Respondents
That
Keep
Records
But
Do
Not
Submit
Reports
(
D)
Number
of
Existing
Respondents
That
Are
Also
New
Respondents
(
E)
Number
of
Respondents
(
E=
A+
B+
C­
D)

1
45
1,590
0
0
1,635
2
45
1,635
0
0
1,680
3
45
1,680
0
0
1,725
Average
45
1,635
0
0
1,680
1
New
respondents
include
sources
with
constructed,
reconstructed
and
modified
affected
facilities.

To
avoid
double­
counting
respondents
column
D
is
subtracted.
As
shown
above,
the
average
Number
of
Respondents
over
the
three
year
period
of
this
ICR
is
1,680.
This
number
appears
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
13(
a),
Number
of
respondents.
14
The
total
number
of
annual
responses
per
year
is
calculated
using
the
following
table:

Total
Annual
Responses
(
A)

Information
Collection
Activity
(
B)

Number
of
Respondents
(
C)

Number
of
Responses
(
D)
Number
of
Existing
Respondents
That
Keep
Records
But
Do
Not
Submit
Reports
(
E)
Total
Annual
Responses
E=(
BxC)+
D
Initial
notification
45
1
0
45
Notification
of
performance
test1
3.3
1
0
3.3
Notification
of
compliance
status
1,680
1
0
1,680
Semiannual
report
1,680
2
0
1,680
Total
3,408
1There
are
10
magnet
wire
facilities
that
each
submit
a
notification
of
performance
test
in
the
4th
year
after
promulgation.
Other
facilities
are
expected
to
comply
with
the
standards
by
reformulating
their
coating
materials
rather
than
purchasing
add­
on
control
devices,
making
performance
tests
unnecessary.

The
number
of
Total
Annual
Responses
is
3,408
(
rounded).
This
number
is
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
13(
b),
Total
annual
responses.
Note
that
four
respondents
have
been
double
counted
in
the
above
table
because
they
have
both
existing
affected
facilities
and
new
affected
facilities.

The
Total
Hours
Requested
is
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
13(
c).
The
total
annual
labor
costs
are
$
54,475,905.
The
annual
labor
costs
are
not
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form.
Details
regarding
these
estimates
may
be
found
in
Table
1a,
1b,
1c,
and
1d.
Annual
Respondent
Burden
and
Cost,
NESHAP
for
Miscellaneous
Metal
Parts
and
Products
(
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
MMMM),
attached.

The
total
annual
capital/
startup
and
O&
M
costs
to
the
regulated
entities
are
$
2,166,667.
This
number
is
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
14(
c),
Total
annualized
cost
requested.
The
cost
calculations
are
detailed
in
Section
6(
b)(
iii),
Capital/
Startup
vs.
Operation
and
Maintenance
(
O&
M)
Costs.

The
average
annual
Agency
burden
and
cost
over
next
three
years
is
estimated
to
be
39,675
labor
hours
at
a
cost
of
$
1,608,425.
See
Tables
2a,
2b,
and
2c.
Annual
Agency
Burden
and
Cost,
NESHAP
for
Miscellaneous
Metal
Parts
and
Products
(
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
MMMM),
attached.
15
16
6(
e)
Bottom
Line
Burden
Hours
Burden
Hours
and
Cost
Tables
The
detailed
bottom
line
burden
hours
and
cost
calculations
for
the
respondents
and
the
Agency
are
shown
in
Tables
1a,
1b,
1c,
and
1d,
and
Tables
2a,
2b,
and
2c,
respectively,
and
summarized
below.

(
i)
Respondent
Tally
The
Total
Hours
Requested
is
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
13(
c).
The
total
annual
labor
costs
are
$
54,475,905.
The
annual
labor
costs
are
not
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form.
Details
regarding
these
estimates
may
be
found
in
Tables
1a,
1b,
1c,
and
1d.
Annual
Respondent
Burden
and
Cost,
NESHAP
for
Miscellaneous
Metal
Parts
and
Products
(
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
MMMM),
attached.
Furthermore,
the
annual
public
reporting
and
recordkeeping
burden
for
this
collection
of
information
is
estimated
to
average
198
hours
per
response.

The
total
annual
capital/
startup
and
O&
M
costs
to
the
regulated
entity
are
$
2,166,667.
This
number
is
shown
on
the
OMB
83­
I
form
in
block
14(
c),
Total
annualized
cost
requested.
The
cost
calculations
are
detailed
in
Section
6(
b)(
iii),
Capital/
Startup
vs.
Operation
and
Maintenance
(
O&
M)
Costs.

(
ii)
The
Agency
Tally
The
average
annual
Agency
burden
and
cost
over
next
three
years
is
estimated
to
be
39,675
labor
hours
at
a
cost
of
$
1,608,425.
See
Tables
2a,
2b,
and
2c.
Annual
Agency
Burden
and
Cost,
NESHAP
for
Miscellaneous
Metal
Parts
and
Products
(
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
MMMM),
attached.

6(
f)
Reasons
for
Change
in
Burden
There
is
an
increase
in
burden
of
535,670
hours
from
the
most
recently
approved
ICR,
due
to
an
adjustment.
The
bulk
of
this
increase
is
due
to
the
recalculation
of
burden
for
magnet
wire
facilities,
in
response
to
a
comment
received
(
see
Section
3(
c),
Public
Notice
Required
Prior
to
ICR
Submission
to
OMB).
Magnet
wire
facilities
have
approximately
20
times
as
many
processes
as
other
facilities
subject
to
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
MMMM.
A
magnet
wire
facility
typically
uses
process
ovens
as
a
control
device
to
combust
coating
residuals,
increasing
energy
efficiency.
Based
on
our
discussion
with
industry
representatives,
we
have
revised
Tables
1b
and
1c
to
increase
certain
magnet
wire
facility
burden
and
costs
by
a
factor
of
20.
Capital/
Startup
vs.
Operation
and
Maintenance
(
O&
M)
Costs
have
also
been
revised
to
reflect
the
magnet
wire
facility
costs.
Additionally,
a
smaller
portion
of
the
increase
in
burden
(
28,359
hours)
is
due
to
the
incremental
burden
for
45
additional
respondents
per
year.

6(
g)
Burden
Statement
The
annual
public
reporting
and
recordkeeping
burden
for
this
collection
of
information
is
17
estimated
to
average
198
hours
per
response.
Burden
means
the
total
time,
effort,
or
financial
resources
expended
by
persons
to
generate,
maintain,
retain,
or
disclose
or
provide
information
to
or
for
a
Federal
agency.
This
includes
the
time
needed
to
review
instructions;
develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purposes
of
collecting,
validating,
and
verifying
information,
processing
and
maintaining
information,
and
disclosing
and
providing
information;
adjust
the
existing
ways
to
comply
with
any
previously
applicable
instructions
and
requirements;
train
personnel
to
be
able
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information;
search
data
sources;
complete
and
review
the
collection
of
information;
and
transmit
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.

An
agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to,
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
valid
OMB
Control
Number.
The
OMB
Control
Numbers
for
EPA's
regulations
are
listed
at
40
CFR
part
9
and
48
CFR
chapter
15.

To
comment
on
the
Agency's
need
for
this
information,
the
accuracy
of
the
provided
burden
estimates,
and
any
suggested
methods
for
minimizing
respondent
burden,
including
the
use
of
automated
collection
techniques,
EPA
has
established
a
public
docket
for
this
ICR
under
Docket
ID
Number
OECA­
2005­
0003,
which
is
available
for
public
viewing
at
the
Enforcement
and
Compliance
Docket
and
Information
Center
in
the
EPA
Docket
Center
(
EPA/
DC),
EPA
West,
Room
B102,
1301
Constitution
Avenue,
NW,
Washington,
D.
C.
The
EPA
Docket
Center
Public
Reading
Room
is
open
from
8:
30
a.
m.
to
4:
30
p.
m.,
Monday
through
Friday,
excluding
legal
holidays.
The
telephone
number
for
the
Reading
Room
is
(
202)
566­
1744,
and
the
telephone
number
for
the
Enforcement
and
Compliance
Docket
and
Information
Center
Docket
is
(
202)
566­
1752.
An
electronic
version
of
the
public
docket
is
available
through
EPA
Dockets
(
EDOCKET)
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
edocket.
Use
EDOCKET
to
submit
or
view
public
comments,
access
the
index
listing
of
the
contents
of
the
public
docket,
and
to
access
those
documents
in
the
public
docket
that
are
available
electronically.
When
in
the
system,
select
"
search,"
then
key
in
the
Docket
ID
Number
identified
above.
Also,
you
can
send
comments
to
the
Office
of
Information
and
Regulatory
Affairs,
Office
of
Management
and
Budget,
725
17th
Street,
NW,
Washington,
D.
C.
20503,
Attention:
Desk
Officer
for
EPA.
Please
include
the
EPA
Docket
ID
Number
OECA­
2005­
0003
and
OMB
Control
Number
2060­
0486
in
any
correspondence.

Part
B
of
the
Supporting
Statement
This
part
is
not
applicable
because
no
statistical
methods
were
used
in
collecting
this
information.
18
Table
1a.
Annual
Respondent
Burden
and
Cost
­­
Year
3
­
Existing
Facilities
NESHAP
for
Miscellaneous
Metal
Parts
and
Products
(
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
MMMM)

Burden
Item
(
A)

Person­
hours
per
occurrence
(
B)
Number
of
occurrences
per
year
(
C)
Person­
hrs.

per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
A*
B)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
person­
hrs.

per
year
(
E=
C*
D)
(
F)
Management
person­
hrs.

per
year
(
F=
E*
0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
person­
hrs.

per
year
(
G=
E*
0.1)
(
I)
Annual
costs
($)

1.0
Read
Rule
and
Instructions
40
1
40
0
0
0
0
0
2.0
Plan
Activities
40
1
40
1,590
63,600
3,180
6,360
5,904,497
3.0
Training
16
1
16
1,590
25,440
1,272
2,544
2,361,799
4.0
Create,
Test,
and
Research
and
Development
60
1
60
1,590
95,400
4,770
9,540
8,856,745
5.0
Gather
Information,
Monitor,

and
Inspect
18
12
216
0
0
0
0
0
6.0
Process/
Compile
and
Review
12
12
144
0
0
0
0
0
7.0
Complete
Reports
8
2
16
0
0
0
0
0
8.0
Record/
Disclose
4
2
8
0
0
0
0
0
9.0
Store/
File
4
2
8
0
0
0
0
0
10.0
LDAR
Reporting
and
Recordkeeping
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS)
AND
COSTS
202
34
548
4,770
184,440
9,222
18,444
17,123,041
212,106
19
Table
1b.
Annual
Respondent
Burden
and
Cost
­­
Year
4
­
Existing
Facilities
NESHAP
for
Miscellaneous
Metal
Parts
and
Products
(
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
MMMM)

Burden
Item
(
A)

Person­
hours
per
occurrence
(
B)
Number
of
occurrences
per
year
(
C)
Person­
hrs.

per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
A*
B)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
person
­
hrs.

per
year
(
E=
C*
D)
(
F)
Management
person­
hrs.

per
year
(
F=
E*
0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
person­
hrs.

per
year
(
G=
E*
0.1)
(
H)
Annual
costs
($)

1.0
Read
Rule
and
Instructions
4
1
4
1,635
6,540
327
654
607,161
2.0
Plan
Activities
8
1
8
1,635
13,080
654
1,308
1,214,321
3.0
Training
8
1
8
1,635
13,080
654
1,308
1,214,321
4.0
Create,
Test,
and
Research
and
Development
0
1
0
1,635
0
0
0
0
5.0
Gather
Information,
Monitor,

and
Inspect
18
12
216
1,625
351,000
17,550
35,100
32,586,138
5.1
Gather
Information,
Monitor,

and
Inspect
­
Magnet
Wire
Facilities1
360
12
4,320
10
43,200
2,160
4,320
4,010,602
6.0
Process/
Compile
and
Review
12
12
144
1,625
234,000
11,700
23,400
21,724,092
6.1
Process/
Compile
and
Review
­

Magnet
Wire
Facilities1
240
12
2,880
10
28,800
1,440
2,880
2,673,734
7.0
Complete
Reports
8
2
16
1,635
26,160
1,308
2,616
2,428,642
8.0
Record/
Disclose
4
2
8
1,635
13,080
654
1,308
1,214,321
9.0
Store/
File
4
2
8
1,635
13,080
654
1,308
1,214,321
10.0
LDAR
Reporting
and
Recordkeeping
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS)
AND
COSTS
666
58
7,612
14,715
742,020
37,101
74,202
68,887,653
853,323
Footnotes
1
The
ten
magnet
wire
facilities
on
average
incorporate
approximately
20
times
the
number
of
processes
typical
for
the
industry.
Accordingly,
burden
of
gathering
information,

monitoring,
inspecting,
and
processing,
compiling,
and
reviewing
has
been
estimated
at
20
times
the
industry
average
per
facility.
20
Table
1c.
Annual
Respondent
Burden
and
Cost
­­
Year
5
­
Existing
Facilities
NESHAP
for
Miscellaneous
Metal
Parts
and
Products
(
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
MMMM)

Burden
Item
(
A)

Person­
hours
per
occurrence
(
B)
Number
of
occurrences
per
year
(
C)
Person­
hrs.

per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
A*
B)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
person
­
hrs.

per
year
(
E=
C*
D)
(
F)
Management
person­
hrs.

per
year
(
F=
E*
0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
person­
hrs.

per
year
(
G=
E*
0.1)
(
H)
Annual
costs
($)

1.0
Read
Rule
and
Instructions
4
1
4
1,680
6,720
336
672
623,871
2.0
Plan
Activities
8
1
8
1,680
13,440
672
1,344
1,247,743
3.0
Training
8
1
8
1,680
13,440
672
1,344
1,247,743
4.0
Create,
Test,
and
Research
and
Development
0
1
0
1,680
0
0
0
0
5.0
Gather
Information,
Monitor,

and
Inspect
18
12
216
1,670
360,720
18,036
36,072
33,488,523
5.1
Gather
Information,
Monitor,

and
Inspect
­
Magnet
Wire
Facilities1
360
12
4,320
10
43,200
2,160
4,320
4,010,602
6.0
Process/
Compile
and
Review
12
12
144
1,670
240,480
12,024
24,048
22,325,682
6.1
Process/
Compile
and
Review
­

Magnet
Wire
Facilities1
240
12
2,880
10
28,800
1,440
2,880
2,673,734
7.0
Complete
Reports
8
2
16
1,680
26,880
1,344
2,688
2,495,485
8.0
Record/
Disclose
4
2
8
1,680
13,440
672
1,344
1,247,743
9.0
Store/
File
4
2
8
1,680
13,440
672
1,344
1,247,743
10.0
LDAR
Reporting
and
Recordkeeping
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS)
AND
COSTS
666
58
7,612
15,120
760,560
38,028
76,056
70,608,869
874,644
Footnotes
1
The
ten
magnet
wire
facilities
on
average
incorporate
approximately
20
times
the
number
of
processes
typical
for
the
industry.
Accordingly,
burden
of
gathering
information,

monitoring,
inspecting,
and
processing,
compiling,
and
reviewing
has
been
estimated
at
20
times
the
industry
average
per
facility.
21
Table
1d.
Annual
Respondent
Burden
and
Cost
­­
Years
3,
4,
and
5
­
New
Facilities
NESHAP
for
Miscellaneous
Metal
Parts
and
Products
(
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
MMMM)

(
Years
3,
4,
and
5
will
be
identical,
as
45
new
facilities
are
constructed
each
year)

Burden
Item
(
A)

Person­
hours
per
occurrence
(
B)
Number
of
occurrences
per
year
(
C)
Person­
hrs.

per
respondent
per
year
(
C=
A*
B)
(
D)
Respondents
per
year
(
E)
Technical
person
­
hrs.

per
year
(
E=
C*
D)
(
F)
Management
person­
hrs.

per
year
(
F=
E*
0.05)
(
G)
Clerical
person­
hrs.

per
year
(
G=
E*
0.1)
(
H)
Annual
costs
($)

1.0
Read
Rule
and
Instructions
40
1
40
45
1,800
90
180
167,108
2.0
Plan
Activities
40
1
40
45
1,800
90
180
167,108
3.0
Training
16
1
16
45
720
36
72
66,843
4.0
Create,
Test,
and
Research
and
Development
60
1
60
45
2,700
135
270
250,663
5.0
Gather
Information,
Monitor,

and
Inspect
18
12
216
45
9,720
486
972
902,385
6.0
Process/
Compile
and
Review
12
12
144
45
6,480
324
648
601,590
7.0
Complete
Reports
8
2
16
45
720
36
72
66,843
8.0
Record/
Disclose
4
2
8
45
360
18
36
33,422
9.0
Store/
File
4
2
8
45
360
18
36
33,422
10.0
LDAR
Reporting
and
Recordkeeping
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS)
AND
COSTS
202
34
548
405
24,660
1,233
2,466
2,289,384
28,359
22
Table
2a.
Annual
Agency
Burden
and
Cost
­­
Year
3
NESHAP
for
Miscellaneous
Metal
Parts
and
Products
(
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
MMMM)

Burden
Item
(
A)

Person­
hours
per
activity
(
B)
Number
of
activities
per
year
(
C)
Technical
person­
hours
per
year
(
C=
A*
B)
(
D)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
D=
C*
0.05)
(
E)
Clerical
person­
hours
per
year
(
E=
C*
0.1)
(
F)

Annual
costs
($/
yr)

1.0
Initial
performance
and
test
N/
A
0
0
0
0
0
2.0
Repeat
performance
test
N/
A
0
0
0
0
0
3.0
Report
review
0
0
0
0
a)
initial
notification
8
45
360
18
36
16,784
b)
notif.
of
performance
test
N/
A
0
0
0
0
0
c)
notif.
of
compliance
status
0
0
0
0
0
0
d)
semiannual
report
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Burden
(
Hrs)
and
Costs
360
18
36
16,784
414
23
Table
2b.
Annual
Agency
Burden
and
Cost
­­
Year
4
NESHAP
for
Miscellaneous
Metal
Parts
and
Products
(
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
MMMM)

Burden
Item
(
A)

Person­
hours
per
activity
(
B)
Number
of
activities
per
year
(
C)
Technical
person­
hours
per
year
(
C=
A*
B)
(
D)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
D=
C*
0.05)
(
E)
Clerical
person­
hours
per
year
(
E=
C*
0.1)
(
F)

Annual
costs
($/
yr)

1.0
Initial
performance
and
test
N/
A
0
0
0
0
0
2.0
Repeat
performance
test
N/
A
0
0
0
0
0
3.0
Report
review
0
0
0
0
a)
initial
notification
8
45
360
18
36
16,784
b)
notif.
of
performance
test
N/
A
0
0
0
0
0
c)
notif.
of
compliance
status
12
1,680
20,160
1,008
2,016
939,879
d)
semiannual
report
12
3,360
40,320
2,016
4,032
1,879,759
Total
Burden
(
Hrs)
and
Costs
60,840
3,042
6,084
2,836,422
69,966
24
Table
2c.
Annual
Agency
Burden
and
Cost
­­
Year
5
NESHAP
for
Miscellaneous
Metal
Parts
and
Products
(
40
CFR
part
63,
subpart
MMMM)

Burden
Item
(
A)

Person­
hours
per
activity
(
B)
Number
of
activities
per
year
(
C)
Technical
person­
hours
per
year
(
C=
A*
B)
(
D)
Management
person­
hours
per
year
(
D=
C*
0.05)
(
E)
Clerical
person­
hours
per
year
(
E=
C*
0.1)
(
F)

Annual
costs
($/
yr)

1.0
Initial
performance
and
test
N/
A
0
0
0
0
0
2.0
Repeat
performance
test
N/
A
0
0
0
0
0
3.0
Report
review
0
0
0
0
a)
initial
notification
8
45
360
18
36
16,784
b)
notif.
of
performance
test
N/
A
0
0
0
0
0
c)
notif.
of
compliance
status
12
45
540
27
54
25,175
d)
semiannual
report
12
3,450
41,400
2,070
4,140
1,930,109
Total
Burden
(
Hrs)
and
Costs
42,300
2,115
4,230
1,972,068
48,645