Document ID: USCG-2007-0096-0001
Agency: uscg
Document Type: Rule
Title: Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Pinellas Bayway Structure ``E (SR 679) Bridge, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 113, St. Petersburg Beach, Pinellas County, FL
Posted Date: 2007-12-04T05:00Z

[Federal Register: December 4, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 232)]
[Proposed Rules]               
[Page 68116-68118]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr04de07-25]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2007-0096]
RIN 1625-AA09

 
Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Pinellas Bayway Structure ``E'' 
(SR 679) Bridge, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 113, St. Petersburg 
Beach, Pinellas County, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to change the drawbridge regulation 
of the Pinellas Bayway Structure ``E'' (SR 679) Bridge, Gulf 
Intracoastal Waterway, mile 113, St. Petersburg Beach, Pinellas County, 
Florida. This rule is needed to provide vehicular traffic relief during 
heavy vehicular traffic periods flowing into a nearby county park while 
still meeting the reasonable needs of mariners.

DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or 
before January 18, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket 
number USCG-2007-0096 to the Docket Management Facility at the U.S. 
Department of Transportation. To avoid duplication, please use only one 
of the following methods:
    (1) Online: http://www.regulations.gov.

    (2) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of 
Transportation, West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (3) Hand delivery: Room W12-140 on the Ground Floor of the West 
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The 
telephone number is 202-366-9329.
    (4) Fax: 202-493-2251.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed 
rule, call Michael Lieberum, Seventh Coast Guard District, Bridge 
Branch, telephone number 305-415-6744. If you have questions on viewing 
or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program 
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

[[Page 68117]]

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting 
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted, 
without change, to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 

personal information you have provided. We have an agreement with the 
Department of Transportation (DOT) to use the Docket Management 
Facility. Please see DOT's ``Privacy Act'' paragraph below.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking (USCG-2007-0096), indicate the specific section of this 
document to which each comment applies, and give the reason for each 
comment. We recommend that you include your name and a mailing address, 
an e-mail address, or a phone number in the body of your document so 
that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission. 
You may submit your comments and material by electronic means, mail, 
fax, or delivery to the Docket Management Facility at the address under 
ADDRESSES; but please submit your comments and material by only one 
means. If you submit them by mail or delivery, submit them in an 
unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for 
copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would 
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, 
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and 
material received during the comment period. We may change this 
proposed rule in view of them.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble 
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov at 

any time, click on ``Search for Dockets,'' and enter the docket number 
for this rulemaking (USCG-2007-0096) in the Docket ID box, and click 
enter. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-
140 on the ground floor of the DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey 
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments received into 
any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment 
(or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, 
business, labor union, etc.). You may review the Department of 
Transportation's Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register 
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477), or you may visit http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov
.

Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a 
request for a meeting by writing to the Bridge Branch, Seventh Coast 
Guard District at the address under ADDRESSES explaining why one would 
be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we 
will hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the 
Federal Register.

Background and Purpose

    The Pinellas Bayway Structure ``E'' (SR 679) Bridge, Gulf 
Intracoastal Waterway, mile 113, St. Petersburg Beach, Pinellas County, 
Florida, currently opens on signal; except that, from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. 
the draw need only open on the hour, 20 minutes after the hour, and 40 
minutes after the hour. The bridge provides vehicular access into and 
out of a popular county park.
    At the request of Florida State Representative Frishe's office, who 
is acting on behalf of local citizens, the Coast Guard is proposing 
this regulation that will require the Pinellas Bayway ``E'' Bridge to 
open on signal, except that from 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. the bridge will open 
on the hour and half-hour. Public vessels of the United States, tugs 
with tows and vessels in distress shall be allowed to pass on signal.

Discussion of Proposed Rule

    Under this proposed rule, the draw of the Pinellas Bayway Structure 
``E'' Bridge would be required to open on signal, except that from 7 
a.m. to 9 p.m. the bridge would only need to open on the hour and half-
hour. The draw would be required to open, upon proper signal, for the 
passage of tugs with tows, public vessels of the United States and 
vessels in a situation where a delay would endanger life or property.
    This proposed rule is expected to provide vehicular traffic relief 
during heavy traffic periods by allowing two openings an hour instead 
of the current three openings an hour.

Regulatory Evaluation

    This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, 
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits 
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and 
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' 
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of 
Homeland Security.
    We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so 
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary, because the 
rule would allow for scheduled bridge openings of this drawbridge and 
all waterway restrictions or closure times would be published with 
adequate time for mariners to plan accordingly.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed 
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities, as the rule will allow for scheduled bridge 
openings.
    This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of 
which may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels needing 
to transit the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway in the vicinity of the 
Pinellas Bayway Structure ``E'' Bridge, persons intending to drive over 
the bridge, and nearby business owners. The revision to the opening 
schedule would not have a significant impact on a substantial number of 
small entities. Vehicle traffic and small business owners in the area 
may benefit from the improved traffic flow that regularly scheduled 
openings will offer this area. Although bridge openings would be less 
frequent, vessel traffic would still be able to transit the Gulf 
Intracoastal Waterway on the hour and half-hour between 7 a.m. until 9 
p.m.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement

[[Page 68118]]

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better 
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the 
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or 
options for compliance please contact the Seventh Coast Guard District 
Bridge Branch at the address under ADDRESSES. The Coast Guard will not 
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this 
rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule 
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications 
for federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any 
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an 
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this 
preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not affect a taking of private property or 
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, 
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected 
Property Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize 
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045, 
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not 
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211, 
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards 
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, 
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why 
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or 
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical 
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or 
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management 
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus 
standards bodies.
    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we 
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction 
M16475.lD which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have 
made a preliminary determination that this action is not likely to have 
a significant effect on the human environment because it simply 
promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges. We 
seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a 
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    Bridges.
    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

    1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); Department of 
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

    2. Revise Sec.  117.287(d)(4) to read as follows:
* * * * *

Sec.  117.287  Gulf Intracoastal Waterway.

    (d)(4) Pinellas Bayway Structure ``E'' (SR 679) bridge, mile 113.0 
at St. Petersburg Beach. The draw shall open on signal, except that 
from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. the draw need open only on the hour and 30 
minutes past the hour.
* * * * *

    Dated: November 21, 2007.
William Lee,
CAPT, USCG, Acting D7 District Commander.
[FR Doc. E7-23412 Filed 12-3-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P