Document ID: SEC-2017-1289-0001
Agency: sec
Document Type: Notice
Title: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes: Nasdaq ISE, LLC
Posted Date: 2017-08-01T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 146 (Tuesday, August 1, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35855-35858]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-16109]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-81213; File No. SR-ISE-2017-73]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing 
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the 
Exchange's Schedule of Fees

July 26, 2017.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on July 13, 2017, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with 
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the 
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items 
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this 
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested 
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the Schedule of Fees, as described 
further below.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
Web site at www.ise.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and 
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

[[Page 35856]]

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange is proposing to amend its Schedule of Fees \3\ 
regarding certain connectivity fees for Market Makers.\4\ Today, the 
Exchange charges Market Makers an application programming interface 
(``API'') fee for connecting to ISE. Each Market Maker session enabled 
for quoting, order entry, and listening is billed at a rate of $1,000 
per month, and allows the Market Maker to submit an average of up to 
1.5 million quotes per day.\5\ Market Makers must pay for a minimum of 
two of these sessions, and incremental usage above 1.5 million quotes 
per day results in the Market Maker being charged for an additional 
session. Market Makers that achieve Market Maker Plus \6\ in 200 or 
more symbols (other than SPY) have their API fees capped at 200 quoting 
sessions per month. Market Makers that achieve Market Maker Plus in SPY 
receive credit for five quoting sessions. Market Makers that quote in 
all FX option products \7\ do not have their FX option quotes counted 
towards the 1.5 million quote threshold, and receive additional credit 
for twelve quoting sessions. All credited sessions are applied after 
the 200 API session cap. Each Market Maker API session that is enabled 
for order entry and listening is billed at a rate of $750 per month, 
and each Market Maker API session that is enabled for listening only is 
billed at a rate of $175 per month.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Exchange filed the proposed fee change on July 3, 2017 
(SR-ISE-2017-70). On July 13, 2017, the Exchange withdrew that 
filing and submitted this filing.
    \4\ The term ``Market Makers'' refers to ``Competitive Market 
Makers'' and ``Primary Market Makers'' collectively. See ISE Rule 
100(a)(25).
    \5\ Quoting sessions also support order entry and listening. The 
Exchange separately offers Market Maker API sessions for listening 
only ($175 per month per API), and for order entry and listening 
($750 per month per API).
    \6\ A Market Maker Plus is a Market Maker who is on the National 
Best Bid or National Best Offer a specified percentage of the time 
for series trading between $0.03 and $3.00 (for options whose 
underlying stock's previous trading day's last sale price was less 
than or equal to $100) and between $0.10 and $3.00 (for options 
whose underlying stock's previous trading day's last sale price was 
greater than $100) in premium in each of the front two expiration 
months. The specified percentage is at least 80% but lower than 85% 
of the time for Tier 1, at least 85% but lower than 95% of the time 
for Tier 2, and at least 95% of the time for Tier 3. A Market 
Maker's single best and single worst quoting days each month based 
on the front two expiration months, on a per symbol basis, will be 
excluded in calculating whether a Market Maker qualifies for Market 
Maker Plus, if doing so will qualify a Market Maker for Market Maker 
Plus.
    \7\ The complete set of FX option products offered is: NZD, PZO, 
SKA, BRB, AUX, BPX, CDD, EUI, YUK, SFC, AUM, GBP, EUU, and NDO.
    \8\ A listener may engage in any activity except submit orders 
and quote, alter orders and cancel orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is currently undergoing a migration of the Exchange's 
trading system to the Nasdaq INET architecture.\9\ This migration 
included the adoption of new connectivity options, including 
Specialized Quote Feed (``SQF'') \10\ port connectivity, which are the 
same as the connectivity options currently used to connect to the 
Exchange's affiliates, including Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (``GEMX''), The 
Nasdaq Options Market LLC (``NOM''), Nasdaq BX (``BX'') and Nasdaq Phlx 
LLC (``Phlx'').\11\ When the Exchange adopted the new SQF port, it did 
not assess a fee so that Market Makers would not be double charged for 
connectivity to the old Exchange architecture and the new Nasdaq INET 
architecture.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80432 (April 11, 
2017), 82 FR 18191 (April 17, 2017) (SR-ISE-2017-03).
    \10\ SQF is an interface that allows market makers to connect 
and send quotes, sweeps and auction responses into the Exchange. 
Data includes the following: (1) Options Auction Notifications 
(e.g., opening imbalance, Flash, PIM, Solicitation and Facilitation 
or other information); (2) Options Symbol Directory Messages; (3) 
System Event Messages (e.g., start of messages, start of system 
hours, start of quoting, start of opening); (4) Option Trading 
Action Messages (e.g., halts, resumes); (5) Execution Messages; (6) 
Quote Messages (quote/sweep messages, risk protection triggers or 
purge notifications).
    \11\ See GEMX Schedule of Fees, IV. Access Services, Port Fees, 
4. Ports; NOM Rules, Chapter XV Options Pricing, Sec. 3 NOM--Ports 
and other Services; BX Rules, Chapter XV Options Pricing, Sec. 3 
BX--Ports and other Services; and Phlx Pricing Schedule, VII. Other 
Member Fees, B. Port Fees.
    \12\ See Securities Exchange Release No. 81095 (July 7, 2017), 
82 FR 32409 (July 13, 2017) (SR-ISE-2017-62).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is providing Market Makers with new SQF ports so that 
they may access the new Nasdaq INET trading system during the migration 
period.\13\ For purposes of this filing, the Market Maker API sessions 
on the current T7 trading system will be referred to as ``current API 
ports'' and the SQF ports on the new INET trading system will be 
referred to as ``new SQF ports.'' Current API ports will be eliminated 
after the migration is complete and only new SQF ports will be utilized 
thereafter. Due to the different infrastructure of the two trading 
systems, there may not be a one-to-one relationship between the number 
of the current API and new SQF ports needed to connect to the Exchange. 
The Exchange expects, however, that the quoting needs and other trading 
activity of Market Makers will remain relatively constant throughout 
the migration and across the two platforms. At this time, the Exchange 
does not have enough experience with the new SQF ports to determine 
whether Market Makers will need the same number of ports after the 
migration to conduct their activities on the Exchange, which the 
Exchange believes will remain relatively consistent as discussed above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ The Exchange will migrate on a symbol by symbol basis 
thereby requiring the use of both the current Market Maker API 
sessions and the new SQF ports for a period of time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In light of this transition process, the Exchange proposes to 
assess Market Makers, who are currently subject to the API fees set 
forth in Section V.C.1 of the Schedule of Fees because they are using 
the current API ports today (``Current Market Makers''), a fixed 
monthly fee (``Fixed Fee'') in lieu of charging them the API fees in 
Section V.C.1, as more fully described below. The Fixed Fee will 
reflect the average of API fees assessed to each Current Market Maker 
for the months of March, April and May 2017.\14\ The Fixed Fee will be 
assessed on a monthly basis to Current Market Makers from July 3, 2017 
through September 29, 2017, and will apply both to API sessions and SQF 
ports used to connect to the Exchange.\15\ Furthermore, the Exchange 
will charge Current Market Makers the Fixed Fee for all of the current 
API and new SQF ports they use in a given month, not per port. No 
additional fees will be assessed to Current Market Makers for using the 
current API or new SQF ports from July

[[Page 35857]]

3, 2017 through September 29, 2017 beyond the Fixed Fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ All Current Market Makers have been utilizing the current 
API ports to connect to the Exchange's trading system during this 
three month look back period. The Exchange did not include June 2017 
as part of the look back period because a number of symbols had 
already migrated onto the new INET trading system at that time, 
thereby requiring Current Market Makers to use both the current 
Market Maker API sessions and the new SQF ports. As such, June 2017 
would not be an accurate representation of the number of API 
sessions typically enabled by a Current Market Maker.
    \15\ The Exchange will notify each Current Market Maker impacted 
by this proposal in writing, either via email or letter, of the 
amount of their Fixed Fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A Market Maker that was not subject to any API fees in Section 
V.C.1 prior to July 3, 2017, because it did not utilize current API 
ports (i.e., a ``New Market Maker''), will be assessed a SQF Port Fee 
of $1,000 per month per port from July 3, 2017 to September 29, 2017 
instead of the Fixed Fee.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ The Exchange does not anticipate any New Market Makers 
seeking to use the current API ports to connect to the existing T7 
trading system for the time period between July 3, 2017 and 
September 29, 2017 given the cost of technology and development 
resources required to connect to an exchange. Furthermore, the 
Exchange also does not anticipate any new Market Makers seeking to 
use the new SQF ports to connect to the INET trading system during 
this three month period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 
6(b) of the Act,\17\ in general, and furthers the objectives of 
Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\18\ in particular, in that it 
provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and 
other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any 
facility, and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between 
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. The concept of a fixed fee is 
not novel. A fixed monthly fee was previously adopted on Phlx in 
connection with active SQF port fees for specialists and market 
makers.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
    \19\ See Securities Exchange Release No. 73687 (November 25, 
2014), 79 FR 71485 (December 2, 2014) (SR-Phlx-2014-73). As part of 
a technology refresh of the Phlx trading system, this proposal 
allowed specialists and market makers on Phlx (i.e., the existing 
specialists and market makers) to pay a fixed monthly fee for both 
their new and old SQF ports from December 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015 
in lieu of the existing port fees they otherwise would have been 
charged by Phlx for their old SQF ports. The fixed monthly fee was 
calculated by taking the average of fees assessed to the Phlx 
specialists and market makers for the months of August, September 
and October 2014. In order to qualify for the option of paying the 
fixed fee, the specialist or market maker must have been using the 
old SQF ports to connect to Phlx's trading system prior to December 
1, 2014. For specialists or market makers who were not using the old 
SQF ports prior to December 1, 2014 but who sought to use the new 
SQF ports (i.e., new specialists and market makers), Phlx charged a 
separate fee per new SQF port they used per month instead of the 
fixed fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed Fixed Fee assessed to 
Current Market Makers is reasonable and equitable for a number of 
reasons. As noted above, Current Market Makers will need to connect to 
the Exchange using both current API and new SQF ports for a period of 
time because the Exchange will migrate to the new INET system on a 
symbol by symbol basis. The Exchange does not intend to charge 
duplicative fees to Current Market Makers for connecting to both 
trading systems. To address this, Current Market Makers will be charged 
the Fixed Fee in lieu of the API fees set forth in Section V.C.1 of the 
Schedule of Fees. This Fixed Fee will apply to both the current API 
ports and the new SQF ports used to connect to the Exchange, and will 
be assessed for all of the current API ports and new SQF ports Current 
Market Makers use in a given month, not per port. As discussed above, 
Current Market Makers that are being assessed the Fixed Fee will not be 
subject to any additional fees through September 29, 2017 beyond the 
Fixed Fee for utilizing any new SQF ports. The Exchange believes that 
applying the Fixed Fee in this manner will ease the transition and 
would help ensure that these members will not be charged duplicative 
fees for using both connectivity options.
    Furthermore, the Exchange believes that averaging the months of 
March, April and May 2017 for the Fixed Fee that will be assessed from 
July 3, 2017 through September 29, 2017 is reasonable because the 
Exchange desires to offer Current Market Makers who are using the 
current API ports today some certainty with respect to their costs 
through transition period. The Exchange believes that utilizing the 
months of March, April and May 2017 to determine the Fixed Fee is 
reasonable because it should be an accurate representation of the 
number of API sessions typically enabled by that particular Market 
Maker. The three month window reflects the typical pattern of usage for 
the Market Maker.
    Additionally, the Exchange believes that the proposed Fixed Fee is 
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory for a number of reasons. 
First, the Fixed Fee will be applied in the same manner to all Current 
Market Makers by averaging the API fees assessed to them for the months 
of March, April and May 2017. It should be noted that while the API fee 
amounts underlying the Fixed Fee generally may be higher or lower for a 
member based on a Current Market Maker's quoting needs and other 
trading activity (which in turn affects the Fixed Fee amounts for that 
Current Market Maker), same API fee amount applies equally to all 
similarly situated market participants based on their quoting needs and 
other trading activity.\20\ For example, each current API port used by 
a Current Market Maker for quoting, order entry and listening is billed 
at a rate of $1,000 per month on the Exchange today. While the number 
of such API ports a Current Market Maker uses may differ each month, 
the same $1,000 fee would be applied for each usage of the API port. As 
such, the Exchange believes that it is still fair and equitable to 
charge different fee amounts for the Fixed Fee because this fee will 
still treat similarly situated members in the same manner by assessing 
the same fees based on what the Exchange believes is a typical 
representation of their quoting or other trading needs. As noted above, 
the Exchange recognizes that Current Market Makers may not need the 
same number of ports post-migration due to the different architecture 
of the two trading systems. The Exchange expects, however, that the 
quoting needs and other trading activity of Market Makers will 
relatively remain constant throughout the migration and across the two 
platforms. As such, even though the proposed Fixed Fee amounts may 
differ among the Current Market Makers, the Exchange will still treat 
similarly situated members in the same manner by assessing the Fixed 
Fee based on the same criteria.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ As discussed above, the Exchange believes that the proposed 
three month look back period for the months of March, April and May 
2017 reveals a typical pattern of usage for a particular Current 
Market Maker. The Exchange anticipates that the three month period 
between July 3, 2017 and September 29, 2017 would likewise be an 
accurate representation of the quoting needs and trading activity of 
such Current Market Maker.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that assessing New Market Makers the proposed 
SQF Port Fee as of July 3, 2017 is reasonable because New Market Makers 
would not need to maintain two sets of ports during the migration 
period, unlike existing Market Makers who are currently transitioning 
from T7 to INET.\21\ The Exchange also believes that it is reasonable 
to charge these new Market Makers the monthly $1,000 SQF port fee as of 
July 3, 2017 because it is equal to the monthly $1,000 API fee the 
Exchange charges Market Makers for the current API ports today. The 
Exchange also notes that the proposed SQF port fee is less than the 
$1,500 port fee Bats BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BATS BZX'') assesses to its 
market makers for Ports with Bulk Quoting Capabilities.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ As noted above, the Exchange does not anticipate any New 
Market Makers seeking to use the new SQF ports to connect to the 
INET trading system during this three month period.
    \22\ See BATS BZX's Fee Schedule at: https://www.bats.com/us/options/membership/fee_schedule/bzx/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that assessing New Market Makers the proposed 
$1,000 SQF Port Fee if they do not use current API ports today is 
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange will 
apply the proposed fee

[[Page 35858]]

uniformly to all similarly situated market participants. The Exchange 
also believes that it is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to 
assess New Market Makers a different fee than the Current Market Makers 
because New Market Makers were not utilizing the current API ports 
during the months of March, April and May 2017. As such, it will not be 
possible to calculate the Fixed Fee for new Market Makers given they do 
not have a three month look-back period to base a Fixed Fee on. 
Furthermore, the proposed SQF Port Fee amount is equivalent to the 
monthly $1,000 API fee the Exchange currently charges for each Market 
Maker API session enabled for quoting, order entry and listening on T7. 
As discussed above, the Exchange recognizes that Market Makers may not 
need the same level of connectivity after the migration for conducting 
largely the same quoting and trading activities due to the different 
architecture of the two platforms. As such, the Exchange represents 
that it will reassess the proposed SQF Port Fee in the event a New 
Market Maker seeks to use new SQF ports during the three month period 
ending September 29, 2017.
    Lastly, the Exchange believes it is reasonable to assess the 
proposed Fixed Fee to Current Market Makers, as well as the proposed 
SQF Port Fee to New Market Makers, from July 3, 2017 through September 
29, 2017. The Exchange will use this time period to monitor the manner 
in which all Market Makers connect to the new INET trading system, and 
will reassess whether the proposed fees are adequate and reasonable.
    The Exchange further believes that the proposed three month 
duration for both the proposed Fixed Fee and the proposed SQF Port Fee 
is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because this duration will 
apply uniformly for all Market Makers.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\23\ the Exchange 
does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden 
on intermarket or intramarket competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As explained 
above, the Exchange is establishing fees for connecting to the Exchange 
in order to aid in the migration to INET architecture. Current Market 
Makers that are transitioning from the current API ports to the new SQF 
ports will be assessed a Fixed Fee that is representative of their 
typical usage, and will not be subject to additional fees for utilizing 
any new SQF ports. In addition, new Market Makers will be assessed the 
proposed $1,000 SQF Port Fee as of July 3, 2017 if they do not use the 
current API ports today. For the reasons described above, the Exchange 
does not believe that assessing the proposed fees will have any 
competitive impact.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\24\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \25\ thereunder. 
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, 
the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it 
appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) Necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the protection of 
investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the 
Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall 
institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be 
approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \25\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-ISE-2017-73 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2017-73. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2017-73 and should be 
submitted on or before August 22, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-16109 Filed 7-31-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P