Document ID: SEC-2017-1746-0001
Agency: sec
Document Type: Notice
Title: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes: Nasdaq MRX, LLC
Posted Date: 2017-10-25T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 25, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49447-49450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23120]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-81907; File No. SR-MRX-2017-21]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq MRX, LLC; Notice of Filing 
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the 
Exchange's Schedule of Fees

October 19, 2017.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on October 5, 2017, Nasdaq MRX, LLC (``MRX'' or ``Exchange'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') 
the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which 
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing 
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from 
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its Schedule of Fees to add new fees 
for co-location services, direct circuit connections to the Exchange, 
connections to third party services, point of presence (``POP'') 
connectivity, and connectivity to the Exchange's Test Facility (the 
``Test Facility'').
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
Web site at www.ise.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and 
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule to eliminate 
certain fees associated with legacy options for connecting to ISE and 
to replace them with fees associated with new options for connecting to 
the Exchange that are similar to those that MRX's sister exchanges 
presently offer.
    The Exchange is engaged in an initiative to migrate the Exchange's 
trading system to the Nasdaq INET architecture. As part of that 
initiative, the Exchange proposes to offer customers various new 
options to connect to the Exchange and to assess fees for such 
connectivity. The connectivity options that the Exchange proposes to 
offer--colocation, direct circuit connectivity, connectivity to third 
party services, POP connectivity, and connectivity to the Exchange's 
Test Facility--and the fees that the Exchange proposes to assess for 
such connectivity are similar to those that the Exchange's affiliated 
Nasdaq, Inc. markets--including The NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC 
(``Nasdaq''), Nasdaq BX, Inc. (``BX''), and Nasdaq Phlx LLC 
(``Phlx'')--presently offer and assess to their customers under their 
respective rules. They are also the same as the connectivity options 
and fees that Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (``GEMX'') and Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'') 
propose to offer and assess under their respective rules in tandem with 
this filing. This proposal, in other words, seeks to harmonize the 
Exchange's connectivity offerings and fees with those of its sister 
exchanges.
    The first new connectivity option that the Exchange proposes to 
offer its customers is co-location. Co-location is a suite of hardware, 
power, telecommunication, and other ancillary products and services 
that allow market participants and vendors to place their trading and 
communications equipment in close physical proximity to the quoting and 
execution facilities of the Exchange and other Nasdaq, Inc. markets. 
The Exchange provides co-location services and imposes fees through 
Nasdaq Technology Services LLC and pursuant to agreements with the 
owner/operator of its data center where both the Exchange's quoting and 
trading facilities and co-located customer equipment are housed. Users 
of colocation services include private extranet providers, data 
vendors, as well as Exchange members and non-

[[Page 49448]]

members. The use of co-location services is entirely voluntary.
    Like its sister exchanges, and as detailed in the proposed co-
location fee schedule, the Exchange proposes to impose a uniform, non-
discriminatory set of fees for various co-location services, including: 
Fees for co-located connections to the Exchange and to third party 
services (described below) in various bandwidths; fees for cabinet 
space usage, or options for future space usage; installation and 
related power provision for hosted equipment; connectivity among 
multiple cabinets being used by the same customer as well as customer 
connectivity to the Exchange and telecommunications providers; and 
related maintenance and consulting services. Fees related to cabinet 
and power usage are incremental, with additional charges being imposed 
based on higher levels of cabinet and/or power usage, the use of non-
standard cabinet sizes or special cabinet cooling equipment, or the re-
selling of cabinet space.
    In addition to co-location services, the Exchange proposes to offer 
several other connectivity options for customers that are located 
outside of the Exchange's primary data center in Carteret, New Jersey.
    First, the Exchange proposes to offer a ``Direct Circuit 
Connectivity'' service, whereby subscribers may connect their 
facilities directly to the Exchange's primary data center using a 
circuit they obtain from an external telecommunications provider. For 
this form of connectivity, the Exchange's proposal offers customers the 
choice of 1 GB, 1 GB Ultra, and 10 GB connections. The installation fee 
for all such connections will be $1,500 and the monthly fee will be 
$7,500 for 10 GB connections and $2,500 for both 1 GB and 1 GB 
connections. The Exchange also proposes to charge a fee to customers 
that choose to install a cable router in its data center and a monthly 
fee for customers that choose to install equipment in the Exchange's 
data center to support the connectivity. Specifically, the Exchange 
proposes an installation fee of $925 per router, switch or modem, and a 
monthly fee of $150 to rent cabinet space based on a unit height of 
approximately 1.75 inches (commonly called a ``U'' space) and a maximum 
power of 125 Watts per U space.
    Next, the Exchange proposes to offer a ``POP Connectivity'' 
service, whereby subscribers may use external telecommunication 
circuits to connect directly to one or more of the Exchange's satellite 
data centers (each, a ``POP'') that are located in places other than 
Carteret. Each POP, in turn, has a fully redundant connection to the 
Exchange's primary data center, such that subscribers may connect to 
the primary data center through its connection to a POP. For POP 
Connectivity to the Exchange, the Exchange proposes to offer 1 GB Ultra 
and 10 GB Ultra connections. The installation fee for all such 
connections will be $1,500 and the monthly fee will be $7,500 for 10 GB 
connections and $2,500 for 1 GB Ultra connections.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Clients will not be permitted to install routers in or rent 
cabinet space directly from the Exchange at the POPs. Accordingly, 
the fee schedule for POP connectivity will not include fees for 
these services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, the Exchange proposes to offer connectivity to third 
party services. The Exchange is proposing to offer this service to both 
non-co-location customers (via a direct circuit connection) and co-
location customers alike. This connectivity will enable customers to 
receive third party market data feeds, including Securities Information 
Processors (``SIPs'') \4\ data, and other non-exchange services.\5\ The 
Exchange will offer this service to customers in both 10 GB Ultra and 1 
GB Ultra connections. The installation fee for both 10 GB Ultra and 1 
GB Ultra direct connections will be $1,500. Meanwhile, the monthly fee 
will be $5,000 for 10 GB Ultra connections and $2,000 for 1 GB Ultra 
connections. For 1 GB Ultra or 10 GB Ultra connections for UTP only, 
the installation fee and monthly fee will be waived for the first two 
connections and thereafter the installation fee will be $100 and the 
monthly fee also will be $100. As with Direct Circuit Connectivity, the 
Exchange proposes to charge a $925 fee to customers that choose to 
install a cable router in its data center for purposes of receiving the 
third party services as well as a monthly fee of $150 for customers 
that choose to install equipment in the Exchange's data center to 
support that connectivity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The SIPs link the U.S. markets by processing and 
consolidating all protected bid/ask quotes and trades from every 
registered exchange trading venue and FINRA into a single data feed, 
and they disseminate and calculate critical regulatory information, 
including the National Best Bid and Offer, Limit Up Limit Down price 
bands, short sale restrictions and regulatory halts.
    \5\ Third Party Services includes not only SIP data feeds, but 
also data feeds from other exchanges and markets. For example, Third 
Party Connectivity will support connectivity to the FINRA/Nasdaq 
Trade Reporting Facility, BATS Depth Feeds, and NYSE Feeds. A 
customer must separately subscribe to the third party services to 
which it connects with a Third Party Connectivity subscription. The 
Exchange notes that customers that do not wish to subscribe to 
Direct Circuit Connectivity to Third Party Services may 
alternatively connect through an extranet provider or a market data 
redistributor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Furthermore, the Exchange proposes to offer connectivity to its 
Test Facility. The Test Facility provides subscribers with a virtual 
system test environment that closely approximates the production 
environment and on which they may test their automated systems that 
integrate with the Exchange. For example, subscribers may test upcoming 
Exchange releases and product enhancements, as well as test software 
prior to implementation. The Exchange proposes to assess certain fees 
for use of the Test Facility. Specifically, the Exchange proposes that 
subscribers to the Test Facility located in Carteret, New Jersey shall 
pay a fee of $1,000 per hand-off, per month for connection to the Test 
Facility. The hand-off fee will includes [sic] either a 1 GB or 10 GB 
switch port and a cross connect to the Test Facility. Subscribers will 
also pay a one-time installation fee of $1,000 per handoff.
    Finally, for each of the connectivity options discussed above, the 
Exchange proposes to include language in the fee schedule which states 
that connectivity to the Exchange also applies to connectivity to all 
of the other Nasdaq, Inc. markets, including Nasdaq, BX, Phlx, ISE, and 
GEMX. This purpose of this proposal is to specify that a client can use 
the connections it establishes and maintains to connect, not only to 
the Exchange, but also to any or all of its sister exchanges, and in 
doing so, it will be billed only once.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 
6(b) of the Act,\6\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 
6(b)(5) of the Act,\7\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote 
just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and 
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market 
system, and, in general to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that proposed new connectivity fees are 
reasonable as a means of covering its costs associated with providing 
new connectivity options. Moreover, these new fees are reasonable 
because they are similar to or the same as the connectivity fees that 
the Exchange's sister exchanges, including Nasdaq, BX, and Phlx, charge 
under their respective rules.\8\ They are

[[Page 49449]]

also the same as those connectivity fees that GEMX and ISE are 
proposing to assess in filings being submitted to the Commission 
concurrently with this one. The Exchange also believes that it is 
reasonable and in the interest of the public and investors to harmonize 
all of the Exchange's connectivity options and connectivity fees now 
that all of the Nasdaq, Inc. exchanges are on a common platform.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Nasdaq Rule 7030, BX Rule 7030, and Nasdaq Phlx LLC 
Pricing Schedule Section VII.E (Test Facility); Nasdaq Rule 7034(b), 
BX Rule 7034(b), and Nasdaq Phlx LLC Pricing Schedule Section X (co-
location); Nasdaq Rule 7051, BX Rule 7051, and Nasdaq Phlx LLC 
Pricing Schedule Section XI (direct connectivity).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed new fees are an equitable 
allocation and are not unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange 
will apply the same fees to all subscribers to the same connectivity 
options.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. In terms of inter-market 
competition, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly 
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor 
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be 
excessive, or rebate opportunities available at other venues to be more 
favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust 
its fees to remain competitive with other exchanges and with 
alternative trading systems that have been exempted from compliance 
with the statutory standards applicable to exchanges. Because 
competitors are free to modify their own fees in response, and because 
market participants may connect to third parties instead of directly 
connecting to the Exchange, the Exchange believes that the degree to 
which fee changes in this market may impose any burden on competition 
is extremely limited.
    In this instance, the proposed changes to the charges assessed for 
connectivity to the Exchange are consistent with the fees assessed by 
other exchanges for the same or similar connectivity. Moreover, the 
Exchange must assess fees to cover the costs incurred in providing 
connectivity and members had been assessed fees for Exchange 
connectivity prior to the sunset of the old Exchange architecture. As a 
consequence, competition will not be burdened by the proposed fees. In 
sum, if the changes proposed herein are unattractive to market 
participants, it is likely that the Exchange will lose market share as 
a result. Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed 
changes will impair the ability of members or competing order execution 
venues to maintain their competitive standing in the financial markets.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) 
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public 
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) 
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or 
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become 
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \9\ and 
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6) 
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission 
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at 
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed 
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. 
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \11\ normally 
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the 
filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \12\ permits the Commission to 
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked 
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal 
may become operative immediately upon filing. The Exchange states that 
the proposed rule change does not significantly affect the protection 
of investors or the public interest because it will eliminate obsolete 
connectivity services and replace them with services that customers 
will need to connect to the Exchange via its new trading platform. The 
Exchange further states that such connectivity services will be 
similar, or the same, as those that are currently offered by other 
Nasdaq, Inc. exchanges. Moreover, the Exchange states that the fees for 
such connectivity that are similar to, or the same, as fees charged by 
the other Nasdaq, Inc. exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day operative delay 
is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. 
The Commission notes that the proposal harmonizes the Exchange's co-
location offerings and fees with those of the other Nasdaq, Inc. 
exchanges. Furthermore, waiver of the 30-day operative delay will 
eliminate the confusion that could occur if different co-location 
offerings were available on each of Nasdaq, Inc.'s affiliated 
exchanges. Accordingly, the Commission hereby waives the 30-day 
operative delay and designates the proposed rule change as operative 
upon filing.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, 
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on 
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) 
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the 
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the 
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the 
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-MRX-2017-21 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MRX-2017-21. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements

[[Page 49450]]

with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the 
Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments 
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are 
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying 
information from comment submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File Number SR-MRX-2017-21 and should be submitted on 
or before November 15, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-23120 Filed 10-24-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P