Document ID: SEC-2019-0435-0001
Agency: sec
Document Type: Proposed Rule
Title: Securities Offering Reform for Closed-End Investment Companies
Posted Date: 2019-04-10T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 69 (Wednesday, April 10, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14448-14552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-05776]

[[Page 14447]]

Vol. 84

Wednesday,

No. 69

April 10, 2019

Part II

Securities and Exchange Commission

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

17 CFR Parts 229, 230 et al.

Securities Offering Reform for Closed-End Investment Companies; 
Proposed Rule

  Federal Register / Vol. 84 , No. 69 / Wednesday, April 10, 2019 / 
Proposed Rules  

[[Page 14448]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

17 CFR Parts 229, 230, 232, 239, 240, 243, 249, 270, and 274

[Release Nos. 33-10619; 34-85382; IC-33427; File No. S7-03-19]
RIN 3235-AM31

Securities Offering Reform for Closed-End Investment Companies

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') is 
proposing rules that would modify the registration, communications, and 
offering processes for business development companies (``BDCs'') and 
other closed-end investment companies under the Securities Act of 1933. 
As directed by Congress, we are proposing rules that would allow these 
investment companies to use the securities offering rules that are 
already available to operating companies. The proposed rules would 
extend to closed-end investment companies offering reforms currently 
available to operating company issuers by expanding the definition of 
``well-known seasoned issuer'' to allow these investment companies to 
qualify; streamlining the registration process for these investment 
companies, including the process for shelf registration; permitting 
these investment companies to satisfy their final prospectus delivery 
requirements by filing the prospectus with the Commission; and 
permitting additional communications by and about these investment 
companies during a registered public offering. In addition, the 
proposed rules would include amendments to our rules and forms intended 
to tailor the disclosure and regulatory framework to these investment 
companies. The proposed rules also include a modernized approach to 
securities registration fee payment that would require closed-end 
investment companies that operate as ``interval funds'' to pay 
securities registration fees using the same method that mutual funds 
use today. Lastly, we are proposing certain structured data reporting 
requirements, including the use of structured data format for filings 
on the form providing annual notice of securities sold pursuant to the 
rule under the Investment Company Act of 1940 that prescribes the 
method by which certain investment companies (including mutual funds) 
calculate and pay registration fees.

DATES: Comments should be received by June 10, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment forms (http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number S7-03-19 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, U.S. 
Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number S7-03-19. This file number 
should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help us 
process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one 
method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's 
website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed.shtml). Comments also are 
available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official 
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. All 
comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting 
comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal 
identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly.
    Studies, memoranda, or other substantive items may be added by the 
Commission or staff to the comment file during this rulemaking. A 
notification of the inclusion in the comment file of any such materials 
will be made available on the Commission's website. To ensure direct 
electronic receipt of such notifications, sign up through the ``Stay 
Connected'' option at www.sec.gov to receive notifications by email.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Asaf Barouk, Attorney-Adviser; J. 
Matthew DeLesDernier, Senior Counsel; Sean Harrison, Senior Counsel; 
Amy Miller, Senior Counsel; Angela Mokodean, Senior Counsel; Jacob D. 
Krawitz, Branch Chief; David J. Marcinkus, Branch Chief; Amanda 
Hollander Wagner, Branch Chief; or Brian McLaughlin Johnson, Assistant 
Director, at (202) 551-6792, Investment Company Regulation Office; 
Christian T. Sandoe, Assistant Director or Michael J. Spratt, Assistant 
Director, at (202) 551-6921, Disclosure Review and Accounting Office; 
Division of Investment Management; U.S. Securities and Exchange 
Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission is proposing for public 
comment amendments to:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.

 
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commission reference                                  CFR citation
                                                      (17 CFR)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Securities Act of 1933            Rule 134..........  Sec.   230.134.
 (``Securities Act '') \1\.
                                  Rule 138..........  Sec.   230.138.
                                  Rule 139..........  Sec.   230.139.
                                  Rule 156..........  Sec.   230.156.
                                  Rule 163..........  Sec.   230.163.
                                  Rule 163A.........  Sec.   230.163A.
                                  Rule 164..........  Sec.   230.164.
                                  Rule 168..........  Sec.   230.168.
                                  Rule 169..........  Sec.   230.169.
                                  Rule 172..........  Sec.   230.172.
                                  Rule 173..........  Sec.   230.173.
                                  Rule 405..........  Sec.   230.405.
                                  Rule 415..........  Sec.   230.415.
                                  Rule 418..........  Sec.   230.418.
                                  Rule 424..........  Sec.   230.424.
                                  Rule 430B.........  Sec.   230.430B.
                                  Rule 433..........  Sec.   230.433.
                                  Rule 462..........  Sec.   230.462.
                                  Rule 497..........  Sec.   230.497.

[[Page 14449]]

 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934   Rule 13a-11.......  Sec.   240.13a-11.
 (``Exchange Act '') \2\.
                                  Rule 15d-11.......  Sec.   240.15d-11.
                                  Form 8-K..........  Sec.   249.308.
Investment Company Act of 1940    Rule 8b-16........  Sec.   270.8b-16.
 (``Investment Company Act '')
 \3\.
                                  Rule 23c-3........  Sec.   270.23c-3.
                                  Rule 24f-2........  Sec.   270.24f-2.
                                  Form 24F-2........  Sec.   274.24.
Securities Act and Investment     Form N-2..........  Sec.   239.14 and
 Company Act.                                          Sec.   274.11a-1.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents

I. Introduction
II. Discussion
    A. Scope of Closed-End Investment Companies Affected by the 
Proposed Rules
    B. Registration Process
    1. Current Shelf Offering Process for Affected Funds
    2. Proposed Amendments to the Registration Process for Affected 
Funds
    C. Well-Known Seasoned Issuer Status
    D. Final Prospectus Delivery Reforms
    E. Communications Reforms
    1. Offering Communications
    2. Broker-Dealer Research Reports
    F. Other Proposed Rule Amendments
    1. Rule 418 Supplemental Information
    2. Amendments to Incorporation by Reference Into Proxy 
Statements
    G. New Registration Fee Payment Method for Interval Funds
    H. Disclosure and Reporting Parity Proposals
    1. Structured Data Requirements
    2. Periodic Reporting Requirements
    3. New Current Reporting Requirements for Affected Funds
    4. Online Availability of Information Incorporated by Reference
    5. Enhancements to Certain Registered CEFs' Annual Report 
Disclosure
    I. Certain Staff No-Action Letters
    J. Conforming Changes to Form N-2
    K. Compliance Date
III. General Request for Comment
IV. Economic Analysis
    A. Introduction and Baseline
    1. Number of Affected Funds
    2. Current Securities Offering Requirements for Affected Funds
    3. Current Disclosure Obligations of Affected Funds
    B. Potential Benefits Resulting From the Proposed Implementation 
of the Statutory Mandates
    1. Improved Access to Capital and Lower Cost of Capital
    2. Facilitated Communication With Investors
    C. Potential Costs Resulting From the Proposed Implementation of 
the Statutory Mandates
    1. Compliance Costs
    2. Other Costs
    D. Alternatives to Proposed Approach to Implementing Statutory 
Mandates
    E. Discussion of Discretionary Choices
    1. New Registration Fee Payment Method for Interval Funds
    2. Structured Data Requirements
    3. Periodic Reporting Requirements
    4. New Current Reporting Requirements for Affected Funds
    5. Online Availability of Information Incorporated by Reference
    F. Request for Comments
V. Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis
    A. Background
    B. Summary of the Proposed Amendments and Impact on Information 
Collections
    1. Proposed Amendments to Form N-2 Registration Statement
    2. Proposed Structured Data Reporting Requirements
    3. Proposed New Annual Reporting Requirements Under Rule 30e-1 
and Exchange Act Periodic Reporting Requirements for BDCs
    4. Securities Offering Communications
    5. Prospectus Delivery Requirements
    6. Proposed Form 8-K Reporting Requirements
    7. Form 24F-2
    C. Request for Comments
VI. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
    A. Reasons for and Objectives of the Proposed Actions
    B. Legal Basis
    C. Small Entities Subject to the Rule
    D. Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance 
Requirements
    1. Registration Process and Final Prospectus Delivery
    2. Communication Rules
    3. New Registration Fee Payment Method for Interval Funds
    4. Disclosure and Reporting Requirements
    E. Duplicative, Overlapping, or Conflicting Federal Rules
    F. Significant Alternatives
    1. Alternatives to Proposed Approach to Implementing Statutory 
Mandates
    2. Alternative Approaches to Discretionary Choices
    G. General Request for Comment
VII. Consideration of Impact on the Economy
VIII. Statutory Authority
Text of Proposed Rules and Forms

I. Introduction

    We are proposing rules that would modify the registration, 
communications, and offering processes for business development 
companies (``BDCs'') and registered closed-end investment companies 
(``registered CEFs'' and, collectively with BDCs, ``affected funds'') 
under the Securities Act.\4\ In 2005, the Commission adopted securities 
offering reforms for operating companies to modernize the securities 
offering and communication processes while maintaining the protection 
of investors under the Securities Act.\5\ At that time, the Commission 
specifically excluded all investment companies--including affected 
funds--from the scope of the reforms.\6\ Now, as directed by Congress, 
we are proposing rules that would allow affected funds to use the 
securities offering rules that are already available to operating 
companies.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ BDCs are a category of closed-end investment companies that 
do not register under the Investment Company Act, but rather elect 
to be subject to the provisions of sections 55 through 65 of the 
Investment Company Act. See section 2(a)(48) of the Investment 
Company Act [15 U.S.C. 80a-2(a)(48)]. Congress established BDCs for 
the purpose of making capital more readily available to small, 
developing and financially troubled companies that do not have ready 
access to the public capital markets or other forms of conventional 
financing. See H.R. Rep. No. 1341, 96th Cong., 2d Sess. 21 (1980).
    \5\ Securities Offering Reform, Securities Act Release No. 8591 
(July 19, 2005) [70 FR 44721 (Aug. 3, 2005)] (``Securities Offering 
Reform Adopting Release''). In this release we generally use the 
term ``operating company'' to refer to issuers that are not 
investment companies and that are currently eligible to rely on the 
rules we are proposing to amend.
    \6\ See, e.g., id. at 44727 (discussing the exclusion of 
investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act and 
BDCs from the definition of ``well-known seasoned issuer''); id. at 
44735 (discussing the exclusion of such companies from safe harbors 
for factual business information and forward-looking information); 
id. at 44784 (discussing the exclusion of such companies from final 
prospectus delivery reforms).
    \7\ See Part II.A infra concerning the definition of ``affected 
funds.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Small Business Credit Availability Act (the ``BDC Act'') 
directs us to allow a BDC to use the securities offering rules that are 
available to other issuers required to file reports under section 13(a) 
or section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.\8\ As discussed in detail below, 
the BDC Act identifies with specificity the required revisions.\9\ The 
Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (the 
``Registered CEF Act'') (and, together with the BDC Act, the ``Acts'') 
directs us to finalize rules to allow any registered CEF that is listed 
on a national

[[Page 14450]]

securities exchange (a ``listed registered CEF'') or that makes 
periodic repurchase offers under rule 23c-3 under the Investment 
Company Act (``rule 23c-3'') \10\ (an ``interval fund'') to use the 
securities offering rules that are available to other issuers that are 
required to file reports under section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the 
Exchange Act, subject to appropriate conditions.\11\ Unlike the BDC 
Act, the Registered CEF Act does not identify with specificity the 
revisions that are required.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Section 803(b) of Small Business Credit Availability Act, 
Public Law 115-141, 132 Stat. 348 (2018) (``BDC Act''). This section 
also directs us to make specified revisions to allow a BDC to use 
the proxy rules that are available to such other issuers. Id. 
Affected funds generally use the proxy rules that are available to 
operating companies already. One current difference applicable to 
these entities, however, is a more limited ability to incorporate 
information into their proxy statements by reference. The BDC Act 
directs that we eliminate this difference by providing these 
entities parity with operating companies. Section 803(b)(2)(N) of 
the BDC Act; see also infra Part II.F.2.
    \9\ See section 803(b)(2) of BDC Act.
    \10\ 17 CFR 270.23c-3.
    \11\ Section 509(a) of Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and 
Consumer Protection Act, Public Law 115-174, 132 Stat. 1296 (2018) 
(``Registered CEF Act''). The Registered CEF Act also refers to 
proxy rules, as does the BDC Act. See supra footnote 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rules would institute a number of reforms:
     First, they would streamline the registration process to 
allow eligible affected funds to use a short-form shelf registration 
statement to sell securities ``off the shelf'' more quickly and 
efficiently in response to market opportunities.
     Second, the proposed rules would allow affected funds to 
qualify as ``well-known seasoned issuers'' (``WKSIs'') under rule 405 
under the Securities Act.
     Third, they would allow affected funds to satisfy final 
prospectus delivery requirements using the same method as operating 
companies.
     Fourth, they would allow affected funds to use 
communications rules currently available to operating companies, such 
as the use of certain factual business information, forward-looking 
information, a ``free writing prospectus,'' and broker-dealer research 
reports.
     Finally, they would tailor the disclosure and regulatory 
framework for affected funds in light of the proposed amendments to the 
offering rules applicable to them. These proposed amendments include 
structured data requirements to make it easier for investors and others 
to analyze fund data; new annual report disclosure requirements to 
provide key information in annual reports; a new requirement for 
registered CEFs to file reports on Form 8-K in a manner similar to 
operating companies and BDCs, including new Form 8-K items tailored to 
registered CEFs and BDCs; and a proposal to require interval funds to 
pay securities registration fees using the same method that mutual 
funds and exchange-traded funds (``ETFs'') use today.
    As discussed in detail below, the proposed rules would affect 
categories of affected funds differently just as categories of 
operating companies are treated differently under these rules 
currently. For example, some of the rules would apply to all affected 
funds, that is, all BDCs and registered CEFs. Many of the proposed 
rules, however, would apply only to ``seasoned funds.'' These are 
affected funds that are current and timely in their reporting and 
therefore generally eligible to file a short-form registration 
statement under the proposal if they have at least $75 million in 
``public float.'' \12\ Some of the proposed rules would apply only to 
seasoned funds that also qualify as WKSIs, that is, seasoned funds that 
generally have at least $700 million in public float. Table 1 
summarizes these different impacts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See infra footnote 18. Form S-3 defines an issuer's 
``aggregate market value,'' commonly referred to as ``public 
float,'' as the ``aggregate market value of the voting and non-
voting common equity held by non-affiliates.'' See General 
Instruction I.B.1 of Form S-3. The determination of public float is 
based on a public trading market, such as an exchange or certain 
over-the-counter markets. See Securities Offering Reform Adopting 
Release, supra footnote 5, at n.50.

                                                     Table 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   Entities affected  by
                Rule                 Summary description of rule     proposed changes       Discussed below in
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             REGISTRATION PROVISIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Securities Act Rule 415............  Permits registration of      Seasoned Funds*.......  Parts II.B.1-II.B.2.a.
                                      securities to be offered
                                      on a delayed or a
                                      continuous basis.
Proposed General Instructions A.2    Provide for backward and     Seasoned Funds........  Part II.B.2.a.
 and F.3 of Form N-2.                 forward incorporation by
                                      reference.
Proposed General Instruction F.4.a.  Requires online posting of   Affected Funds........  Part II.H.4.
                                      information incorporated
                                      by reference.
Securities Act Rule 430B...........  Permits certain issuers to   Seasoned Funds........  Part II.B.2.b.
                                      omit certain information
                                      from their ``base''
                                      prospectuses and update
                                      the registration statement
                                      after effectiveness.
Securities Act Rules 424 and 497...  Provide the processes for    Affected Funds........  Part II.B.2.b.
                                      filing prospectus
                                      supplements.
Securities Act Rule 462............  Provides for effectiveness   WKSIs.................  Part II.B.2.a.
                                      of registration statements
                                      immediately upon filing
                                      with the Commission.
Securities Act Rule 418............  Exempts some registrants     Seasoned Funds........  Part II.F.1.
                                      from an obligation to
                                      furnish certain
                                      engineering, management,
                                      or similar reports.
Investment Company Act Rule 22c-3..  Subjects interval funds to   Interval Funds........  Part II.G.
                                      the registration fee
                                      payment system based on
                                      annual net sales.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            COMMUNICATIONS PROVISIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Securities Act Rule 134............  Permits issuers to publish   Affected Funds........  Part II.E.1.
                                      factual information about
                                      the issuer or the
                                      offering, including
                                      ``tombstone ads''.
Securities Act Rule 163A...........  Permits issuers to           Affected Funds........  Part II.E.1.
                                      communicate without risk
                                      of violating the gun-
                                      jumping provisions until
                                      30 days prior to filing a
                                      registration statement.
Securities Act Rules 168 and 169...  Permit the publication and   Affected Funds........  Part II.E.1.
                                      dissemination of regularly
                                      released factual and
                                      forward-looking
                                      information.
Securities Act Rules 164 and 433...  Permit use of a ``free       Affected Funds........  Part II.E.1.
                                      writing prospectus''.

[[Page 14451]]

 
Securities Act Rule 163............  Permits oral and written     WKSIs.................  Part II.E.1.
                                      communications by WKSIs at
                                      any time.
Securities Act Rule 138............  Permits a broker or dealer   Seasoned Funds........  Part II.E.2.
                                      to publish or distribute
                                      certain research about
                                      securities other than
                                      those they are
                                      distributing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            PROXY STATEMENT PROVISION
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 13 of Schedule 14A............  Permits certain registrants  Seasoned Funds........  Part II.F.2.
                                      to use incorporation by
                                      reference to provide
                                      information that otherwise
                                      must be furnished with
                                      certain types of proxy
                                      statements.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         PROSPECTUS DELIVERY PROVISIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Securities Act Rules 172 and 173...  Permit issuers, brokers,     Affected Funds........  Part II.D.
                                      and dealers to satisfy
                                      final prospectus delivery
                                      obligations if certain
                                      conditions are satisfied.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      STRUCTURED DATA REPORTING PROVISIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Structured Financial Statement Data  A requirement that BDCs tag  BDCs..................  Part II.H.1.a.
                                      their financial statements
                                      using Inline eXtensible
                                      Business Reporting
                                      Language (``Inline XBRL'')
                                      format.
Prospectus Structured Data           A requirement that           Affected Funds........  Parts II.H.1.b-
 Requirements.                        registrants tag certain                              II.H.1.c.
                                      information required by
                                      Form N-2 using Inline XBRL.
Form 24F-2 Structured Format.......  A requirement that filings   Form 24F-2 Filers.....  Part II.H.1.d.
                                      on Form 24F-2 be submitted
                                      in a structured format.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          PERIODIC REPORTING PROVISIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investment Company Act Rule 8b-16..  A requirement that funds     Registered CEFs.......  Part II.H.5.
                                      that rely on the rule
                                      disclose certain
                                      enumerated changes in the
                                      annual report in enough
                                      detail to allow investors
                                      to understand each change
                                      and how it may affect the
                                      fund.
Proposed Item 24.4.h(2) of Form N-2  A requirement for            Seasoned Funds........  Part II.H.2.a.
                                      information about the
                                      investor's costs and
                                      expenses in the
                                      registrant's annual report.
Proposed Item 24.4.h(3)............  A requirement for            Seasoned Funds........  Part II.H.2.a.
of Form N-2........................   information about the
                                      share price of the
                                      registrant's stock and any
                                      premium or discount in the
                                      registrant's annual report.
Proposed Item 24.4.h(1) of Form N-2  A requirement for            Seasoned Funds........  Part II.H.2.a.
                                      information about each of
                                      a fund's classes of senior
                                      securities in the
                                      registrant's annual report.
Proposed Item 24.4.g of Form N-2...  A requirement for narrative  Registered CEFs.......  Part II.H.2.b.
                                      disclosure about the
                                      fund's performance in the
                                      fund's annual report.
Item 4 of Form N-2.................  Requires disclosure of       BDCs..................  Part II.H.2.c.
                                      certain financial
                                      information.
Proposed Item 24.4.h(4) of Form N-2  A requirement to disclose    Seasoned Funds........  Part II.H.2.d.
                                      outstanding material staff
                                      comments that remain
                                      unresolved for a
                                      substantial period of time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            CURRENT REPORT PROVISIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exchange Act Rules 13a-11 and 15d-   Require registered CEFs to   Registered CEFs.......  Part II.H.3.a.
 11.                                  file current reports on
                                      Form 8-K.
Proposed Section 10 of Form 8-K....  Requires current reporting   Affected Funds........  Part II.H.3.b.
                                      of two new events specific
                                      to affected funds.
Regulation FD Rule 103.............  Provides that a failure to   Seasoned Funds........  Part II.H.3.d.
                                      make a public disclosure
                                      required solely by rule
                                      100 of Regulation FD will
                                      not disqualify a
                                      ``seasoned'' issuer from
                                      use of certain forms.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Some of the proposed rule changes that are shown above as affecting ``seasoned funds'' would only affect those
  seasoned funds that elect to file a registration statement on Form N-2 using a proposed instruction permitting
  funds to use the form to file a short-form registration statement.

[[Page 14452]]

II. Discussion

A. Scope of Closed-End Investment Companies Affected by the Proposed 
Rules

    While the rulemaking mandate of the BDC Act applies to all BDCs, 
the mandate of the Registered CEF Act extends to most, but not all, 
registered CEFs.\13\ Specifically, the BDC Act addresses both BDCs that 
are listed on an exchange and those that are not, while the Registered 
CEF Act extends to all registered CEFs that are listed on an exchange 
as well as interval funds, but excludes other unlisted funds. We 
propose to apply the proposed rules to all BDCs and registered CEFs, 
with certain conditions and exceptions discussed below and generally 
illustrated in Table 1 above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See section 509(a) of Registered CEF Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Although the Registered CEF Act only requires us to allow interval 
funds and listed registered CEFs to use the securities offering rules 
available to operating companies, that Act does not preclude us from 
exercising our discretion to extend these rules to all registered CEFs. 
Except as noted below, we believe, for purposes of the relevant 
securities offering and communications rules, that unlisted registered 
CEFs are not distinguishable from unlisted BDCs, which the proposed 
rules must cover, and that unlisted registered CEFs would benefit from 
parity of treatment. Although certain benefits of the rules we are 
proposing to amend are less likely to apply, by their existing terms, 
to unlisted issuers,\14\ the scope of our proposed amendments would 
generally treat unlisted BDCs, unlisted registered CEFs, and unlisted 
operating companies in a consistent manner. We believe that this 
approach would benefit unlisted registered CEFs and their investors, 
including by providing new investor protections to investors in these 
funds. It also could avoid adverse consequences that could result from 
treating unlisted registered CEFs differently from all other registered 
CEFs and unlisted BDCs. For example, such disparate treatment could 
produce potential competitive disparities \15\ and the possibility of 
anomalous results if an unlisted registered CEF were to list its shares 
and at that time become subject to different offering requirements. The 
proposal therefore would provide all BDCs and registered CEFs 
additional flexibility in raising capital, subject to the conditions 
and associated investor protections included in the proposed rules. We 
recognize that despite this consistent treatment of affected funds, 
unlisted affected funds may not qualify to rely on all of the rules we 
propose to amend, by those rules' existing terms and conditions (for 
example, most interval funds). However, these funds still would be able 
to rely on many of the rules to gain additional flexibility in multiple 
aspects of the offering process.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ For example, affected funds that do not list their 
securities on an exchange and do not have ``public float''--such as 
most interval funds--would generally not qualify to be WKSIs or to 
file short-form registration statements. See, e.g., infra footnotes 
35-37.
    \15\ See infra Part IV.B.1.
    \16\ For example, these funds would newly be able to satisfy 
final prospectus delivery obligations by filing a prospectus with 
the Commission under the conditions discussed in Part II.D infra, 
and the proposed rules also would significantly expand these funds' 
flexibility with respect to offering communications as discussed in 
Part II.E infra. These funds would also be subject to the other 
requirements we are proposing for affected funds, such as the 
requirement to provide reports on Form 8-K discussed in Part II.H.3 
infra. We are also proposing a modernized approach to interval 
funds' payment of securities registration fees. See infra Part II.G.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Although the BDC Act's requirements are more specific than those in 
the Registered CEF Act, we believe they both share the overall purpose 
of providing offering and communication rule parity to the investment 
companies covered by the Acts. In particular, both Acts direct that we 
make available to these investment companies the securities offering 
rules that are available to other issuers required to file reports 
under section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. The BDC Act expressly 
and specifically requires that we apply many of the proposed amendments 
to BDCs while the Registered CEF Act does not expressly and 
specifically identify the required revisions for registered CEFs, but 
the two Acts share similar broad mandates. We believe that, except 
where dictated by meaningful differences between BDCs and registered 
CEFs--or each type of entity's broader regulatory environment--
consistent application of the proposed rules across affected funds 
would result in more efficient offering processes and more consistent 
investor protections. Accordingly, the proposed rules would generally 
apply the specific requirements of the BDC Act to both BDCs and 
registered CEFs, with certain conditions and exceptions discussed 
below.
    We request comment on the proposed scope of affected funds.
     Is the proposed scope of affected funds appropriate?
     Should open-end registered investment companies be 
included in the scope of the affected funds? Why or why not? Should 
some open-end registered investment companies but not others be 
included? If so, which ones and why?
     Should any investment companies be removed from the scope 
of affected funds? If so, which ones and why? Should the scope--or the 
scope of any of the individual aspects of the proposed rules--be 
narrowed to exclude registered CEFs that are neither interval funds nor 
listed registered CEFs?
     We also request comment as to whether each proposed 
amendment discussed throughout this release should include additional 
or fewer types of investment companies.

B. Registration Process

    We are proposing amendments to our rules and forms to permit 
affected funds to use the more flexible registration process currently 
available to operating companies. Specifically, the proposed amendments 
would allow affected funds to sell securities ``off the shelf'' more 
quickly and efficiently in response to market opportunities.
1. Current Shelf Offering Process for Affected Funds
    Issuers, including affected funds, that are eligible to register 
their securities offerings on Form S-3 may conduct primary offerings 
``off the shelf'' under Securities Act rule 415(a)(1)(x), the provision 
for offerings made on a delayed or continuous basis.\17\ In a rule 
415(a)(1)(x) shelf offering, a seasoned issuer can register an 
unallocated dollar amount of securities for sale at a later time.\18\ 
The issuer can then take down

[[Page 14453]]

securities ``off the shelf'' for sale in a public offering as market 
conditions warrant. This allows seasoned issuers to quickly access the 
public securities markets from time to time to take advantage of 
favorable market conditions.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ Primary offerings that are not continuous in nature may 
only be made on a delayed, or ``shelf,'' basis if they fit within 
one of the narrow sets of permissible delayed offerings in Rule 
415(a)(1), including rule 415(a)(1)(x). In a continuous offering, an 
issuer must be ready and willing to sell the securities at all 
times. The issuer may not suspend and resume the offering. See 
Continuous or Delayed Offerings by Certain Closed-End Management 
Investment Companies, Investment Company Act Release No. 19391 (Apr. 
7, 1993) [58 FR 19361, 19362 (Apr. 14, 1993)]. An issuer also can 
rely on rule 415(a)(1)(x) to make an immediate offering.
    \18\ In this release we use the term ``seasoned'' to refer 
generally to an issuer that meets the registrant requirements in 
General Instruction I.A of Form S-3 and, when referring to seasoned 
funds, a fund that meets these Form S-3 registrant requirements as 
well as certain proposed modifications for registered CEFs. Among 
other things, General Instruction I.A requires that the registrant 
(1) has been subject to the reporting requirements of sections 12 or 
15(d) of the Exchange Act and has filed all of the material required 
to be filed pursuant to sections 13, 14, or 15(d) of the Exchange 
Act for at least twelve calendar months immediately preceding the 
filing of the registration statement; and (2) has filed in a timely 
manner all reports required to be filed during the twelve calendar 
months and any portion of a month immediately preceding the filing 
of the registration statement (with specified Form 8-K exceptions). 
A foreign private issuer also can meet the registrant requirements 
of Form F-3, in lieu of Form S-3. We focus in this release on Form 
S-3 because a foreign investment company generally cannot make a 
public offering of its securities in the United States. See section 
7(d) of the Investment Company Act [15 U.S.C. 80a-7(d)].
    \19\ Issuers that rely on rule 415(a)(1)(x) must file a new 
registration statement every three years, with unsold securities and 
unused fees carried forward to the new registration statement. See 
Securities Act rule 415(a)(5) [17 CFR 230.415(a)(5)]. If the new 
registration statement is an automatic shelf registration statement 
filed by a WKSI, it will be effective immediately upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Affected funds currently can make shelf offerings under rule 
415(a)(1)(x) if they meet the eligibility criteria for Form S-3, even 
though affected funds register their securities offerings on Form N-
2.\20\ Our rules for operating companies, however, are more flexible 
and efficient than for affected funds. In particular, seasoned 
operating companies can use a short-form registration statement on Form 
S-3. Certain seasoned operating companies also can rely on Securities 
Act rule 430B to omit certain information from the ``base'' prospectus 
when the registration statement becomes effective and later provide 
that information in a subsequent Exchange Act report incorporated by 
reference, a prospectus supplement, or a post-effective amendment.\21\ 
The ability to ``forward incorporate'' information in Exchange Act 
reports filed after the registration statement becomes effective allows 
operating companies to efficiently update their prospectuses and access 
capital markets without the expense and delay of filing post-effective 
amendments in most cases.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See Revisions to the Eligibility Requirements for Primary 
Securities Offerings on Forms S-3 and F-3, Securities Act Release 
No. 8878 (Dec. 19, 2007) [72 FR 73534, 73537 n.36 (Dec. 27, 2007)] 
(``Rule 415(a)(1)(x) permits shelf offerings of securities 
`registered (or qualified to be registered) ' on Form S-3 or Form F-
3. We note that a closed-end investment company, including a 
business development company . . . that meets the eligibility 
standards enumerated in Form S-3, as revised by new General 
Instruction I.B.6., may register its securities in reliance on Rule 
415(a)(1)(x) notwithstanding the fact that closed-end funds register 
their securities on Form N-2 rather than Form S-3.'' (emphasis 
added)). Affected funds also can currently conduct offerings under 
other provisions of rule 415(a)(1).
    \21\ The base prospectus of a shelf registration statement will 
generally describe in broad terms the types of securities and 
offerings that the issuer may conduct at some later time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Affected funds, on the other hand, currently have limited ability 
to incorporate information by reference into their registration 
statements and cannot forward incorporate information from 
subsequently-filed Exchange Act reports.\22\ When an affected fund 
sells securities, including as part of a ``takedown off the shelf,'' 
its registration statement must include all required information.\23\ 
In particular, the affected fund's registration statement must include 
current financial information, including any annual update required by 
section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act.\24\ Affected funds provide any 
section 10(a)(3) update to the registration statement by filing a post-
effective amendment, which involves the expense and potential delay 
associated with the fund's preparation of the amendment and our staff's 
review and comment process.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ Form N-2 permits registrants to ``backward incorporate'' 
financial information from a previously-filed report under limited 
circumstances: (1) A registered CEF can satisfy the requirements to 
provide financial highlights in the prospectus, and financial 
statements in the SAI, by incorporating this information by 
reference to a previously-filed annual or semi-annual report filed 
on Form N-CSR; and (2) a BDC may satisfy the requirement to provide 
similar financial and other information by reference to a 
previously-filed annual report on Form 10-K. See General Instruction 
F of Form N-2.
    \23\ The fund's registration statement must include all required 
information to avoid liability from selling securities from an out-
of-date prospectus and to satisfy section 10(a) of the Securities 
Act. See infra footnotes 67-68 and accompanying text.
    \24\ Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act provides that when a 
prospectus is used more than nine months after the effective date of 
the registration statement, the information contained therein shall 
be as of a date not more than sixteen months prior to such use. 15 
U.S.C. 77j. An affected fund registering an offering under rule 415 
also must undertake to file a post-effective amendment to the 
registration statement: (1) To include any prospectus required by 
section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act; (2) to reflect in the 
prospectus any facts or events after the effective date of the 
registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment 
thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a 
fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration 
statement; and (3) to include any material information with respect 
to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the 
registration statement or any material change to such information in 
the registration statement. See Item 34.4 of Form N-2.
    \25\ These post-effective amendments are filed pursuant to 
section 8(c) of the Securities Act and must be declared effective, 
typically by the staff acting pursuant to delegated authority. In 
contrast, under Form S-3, an issuer's section 10(a)(3) update need 
not be made through a separate post-effective amendment. Rather, 
under that form, when the issuer files its annual report on Form 10-
K containing the issuer's audited financial statements for its most 
recently completed fiscal year by the due date of the annual report, 
it operates as a post-effective amendment to the registration 
statement for purposes of section 10(a)(3). See Securities Offering 
Reform Adopting Release, supra footnote 5, at n.61.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Affected funds also cannot currently rely on rule 430B, which 
allows certain issuers to omit information from a base prospectus, or 
the process that operating companies follow to file prospectus 
supplements.\26\ In addition, affected funds cannot currently file 
automatic shelf registration statements because only WKSIs can file 
these registration statements. These differences can result in 
additional expense or delay for affected funds relative to operating 
companies and can affect the timing of an affected fund's capital 
raising.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ Rule 430B is available for automatic shelf registration 
statements filed by WKSIs and shelf registration statements filed by 
certain issuers eligible to use Form S-3 for a primary offering. 
Affected funds currently rely on Securities Act rule 430A and rule 
430C, which do not permit an issuer to omit as much information as 
permitted under rule 430B.
    \27\ Affected funds in particular may want greater flexibility 
to control the timing of their capital raising because section 23(b) 
of the Investment Company Act generally prohibits a registered CEF 
from issuing its shares at a price below the fund's current net 
asset value (``NAV'') without shareholder approval (and this 
provision applies to BDCs as well with certain modifications). 15 
U.S.C. 80a-23(b); 15 U.S.C. 80a-62. Because the shares of affected 
funds often trade at a discount to NAV, these funds may want to 
quickly access the markets when their shares are trading at a 
premium. Selling securities ``off the shelf'' is one way to achieve 
such quick access.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Proposed Amendments to the Registration Process for Affected Funds
    Consistent with the BDC Act and the Registered CEF Act, we are 
proposing to provide affected funds parity with operating companies by 
permitting affected funds to:
     File a short-form registration statement on Form N-2 that 
will function like a Form S-3 registration statement. An affected fund 
eligible to file this short-form registration statement could use it to 
register shelf offerings, including shelf registration statements filed 
by WKSI affected funds that become effective automatically, and could 
satisfy Form N-2's disclosure requirements by incorporating by 
reference information from the fund's Exchange Act reports;
     Rely on rule 430B to omit information from their base 
prospectuses, and to use the process operating companies follow to file 
prospectus supplements; and
     Include additional information in periodic reports to 
update their registration statements, provided that this information is 
identified as being included for this purpose.
a. Short-Form Registration on Form N-2
    We are proposing a new instruction to Form N-2 to allow affected 
funds to file a short-form registration statement on Form N-2 that will 
function like a registration statement filed on Form

[[Page 14454]]

S-3. We generally refer to this proposed instruction, General 
Instruction A.2, as the ``short-form registration instruction'' and 
funds relying on this instruction as filing a short-form registration 
statement on Form N-2.\28\ If a fund is eligible to file a registration 
statement under this new instruction, the fund's registration statement 
would incorporate certain past and future Exchange Act reports by 
reference, allowing the fund to use a short-form registration statement 
and avoid the need to make post-effective amendments in most cases. An 
affected fund could use the proposed instruction to register a shelf 
offering under rule 415(a)(1)(x), and we are proposing conforming 
amendments to that rule to make this clear. But the proposed 
instruction would not be limited to offerings under rule 415(a)(1)(x); 
an affected fund could use the proposed instruction to register any of 
the securities offerings that operating companies are permitted to 
register on Form S-3.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ Proposed General Instruction A.2 of Form N-2. Some of the 
required amendments and the conditions in our current rules are 
available only to issuers that meet the eligibility and transaction 
requirements of Form S-3 and are therefore eligible to file a short-
form registration statement on that form. The proposed short-form 
registration instruction in Form N-2 is designed to facilitate these 
amendments that we are proposing to implement the BDC Act and the 
Registered CEF Act.
    \29\ See General Instruction I.B of Form S-3 (identifying 
transactions that can be registered on the form); proposed General 
Instruction A.2.c of Form N-2. Form S-3, and therefore the proposed 
short-form registration instruction, also is available to a 
majority-owned subsidiary that is a closed-end management investment 
company eligible to register a securities offering on Form N-2 if 
(1) the subsidiary independently satisfies the form's registrant 
eligibility and transactional requirements; (2) the parent satisfies 
the form's registrant requirements and the transaction requirement 
for a primary offering of non-convertible securities; (3) the parent 
satisfies the form's registrant eligibility and transactional 
requirements and provides a full and unconditional guarantee of the 
payment obligations on the securities being registered; (4) the 
parent satisfies the form's registrant eligibility and transactional 
requirements and the securities of the registrant subsidiary being 
registered are guarantees of the payment obligations on the parent's 
non-convertible securities; and (5) the parent satisfies the form's 
registrant eligibility and transactional requirements and the 
securities of the registrant subsidiary being registered are 
guarantees of the payment obligations on the non-convertible 
securities being registered by another majority-owned subsidiary. 
See General Instruction I.C of Form S-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eligibility To File a Short-Form Registration Statement
    An affected fund would be able to file a short-form registration 
statement under the proposed short-form registration instruction if:

 For either a BDC or a registered CEF, the fund meets the 
registrant and transaction requirements of Form S-3 (i.e., the fund 
could register the offering on Form S-3 if it were an operating 
company); \30\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ See proposed General Instructions A.2.a and A.2.c of Form 
N-2; General Instructions I.A (registrant requirements) and I.B 
(transaction requirements) of Form S-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 For registered CEFs, the fund also has been registered under 
the Investment Company Act for at least 12 calendar months immediately 
preceding the filing of the registration statement and has timely filed 
all reports required to be filed under section 30 of the Investment 
Company Act during that time.\31\ This time period and timely-filing 
requirement parallel the requirements in Form S-3 regarding an issuer's 
Exchange Act reports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ Under the proposed amendment, the fund would also have to 
have timely filed all reports required to be filed under section 30 
of the Investment Company Act during any portion of a month 
immediately preceding the filing of the registration statement. See 
proposed General Instruction A.2.b of Form N-2.

    An affected fund would generally meet the registrant requirements 
of Form S-3 if it has timely filed all reports and other materials 
required under the Exchange Act during the prior year.\32\ An affected 
fund would generally meet the transaction requirements of Form S-3 for 
a primary offering if the fund's public float is $75 million or 
more.\33\ Requiring affected funds to satisfy the requirements of Form 
S-3 in order to file a short-form registration statement would provide 
parity for affected funds and operating companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ See General Instruction I.A.3 of Form S-3. In addition, we 
are proposing two new Form 8-K reporting items for affected funds. 
An affected fund's failure to timely file Form 8-K reports solely 
under these proposed items would not affect the fund's ability to 
file a short-form registration statement on Form N-2. See infra Part 
II.H.3.
    \33\ See General Instruction I.B of Form S-3. For example, 
certain issuers with less than a $75 million public float also are 
eligible to use Form S-3 to register a primary offering but are 
limited as to the amount of securities they can register. See 
General Instruction I.B.6 of Form S-3. See also infra Part II.C 
(discussing our consideration of a different level of public float 
for an affected fund to qualify as a WKSI or to file a short-form 
registration statement on Form N-2, or a different metric in lieu of 
an affected fund's public float).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Certain affected funds, including most interval funds,\34\ do not 
list their securities on an exchange and do not have public float. As a 
result, there are some affected funds that generally would not be able 
to satisfy the transaction requirement necessary to file a short-form 
registration statement.\35\ Interval funds have their own offering 
provision, Securities Act rule 415(a)(1)(xi),\36\ and certain post-
effective amendments to their registration statements are immediately 
effective under rule 486(b) under the Securities Act.\37\ As a result, 
interval funds currently have a tailored registration process that, 
although different in certain respects from that of operating 
companies, may provide many of the same efficiencies. In addition, 
because interval funds make continuous offerings, they would not be 
able to file a short-form registration statement that omits information 
required to be in an issuer's prospectus when it is offering its 
securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ Only one interval fund is currently exchange-traded.
    \35\ The proposed short-form registration instruction is 
designed to provide affected funds parity with operating companies 
by permitting them to use the instruction to register the same 
transactions that an operating company can register on Form S-3. To 
register a primary offering of equity securities on Form S-3, an 
issuer must have a requisite amount of public float. See General 
Instruction I.B.1 of Form S-3. Alternatively, an issuer must have 
shares listed on an exchange and limit the amount sold over a 
twelve-month period to no more than one-third of the aggregate value 
of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates. See 
General Instruction I.B.6 of Form S-3. Interval funds that are not 
exchange-listed and without public float would not be qualified to 
register a primary offering of their shares on Form S-3.
    \36\ 17 CFR 230.415(a)(1)(xi).
    \37\ 17 CFR 230.486(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Along with satisfying the registrant requirements of Form S-3, a 
registered CEF also must have timely filed all reports required under 
section 30 of the Investment Company Act for the preceding 12 months in 
order to register an offering under the proposed short-form 
registration instruction.\38\ A registered CEF therefore must have 
timely filed during the prior year all required Exchange Act reports, 
such as annual and semi-annual reports to shareholders filed with the 
Commission on Form N-CSR,\39\ as well as reports required only under 
section 30 of the Investment Company Act, such as reports on new Forms 
N-CEN \40\ and N-PORT.\41\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ See proposed General Instruction A.2.b of Form N-2.
    \39\ 17 CFR 249.331 and 17 CFR 274.128. Reports on Form N-CSR 
are filed both under the Exchange Act and the Investment Company 
Act.
    \40\ 17 CFR 249.330 and 17 CFR 274.101.
    \41\ 17 CFR 274.150. In October 2016, we modernized the 
reporting and disclosure of information by registered investment 
companies. Specifically, we adopted a new monthly portfolio 
reporting form, Form N-PORT, which replaces Form N-Q [17 CFR 249.332 
and 17 CFR 274.130]. Form N-PORT requires registered investment 
companies other than money market funds and small business 
investment companies to report information about their monthly 
portfolio holdings to the Commission in a structured data format on 
a quarterly basis, 60 days after quarter end. See Investment Company 
Reporting Modernization, Investment Company Act Release No. 32314 
(Oct. 13, 2016) [81 FR 81870 (Nov. 18, 2016)] (``Reporting 
Modernization Release''); see also Amendments to the Timing 
Requirements for Filing Reports on Form N-PORT, Investment Company 
Act Release No. 33384 (Feb. 27, 2019) [84 FR 7980 (Mar. 6, 2019)] 
(``N-PORT Modification Release''). We also adopted a new annual 
reporting form, Form N-CEN, to be used by registered investment 
companies to report annually certain census-type information. Fund 
groups with $1 billion or more in net assets will begin filing 
reports on Form N-PORT with the Commission by April 30, 2019 (for 
the period ending March 31, 2019). Smaller fund groups (i.e., fund 
groups with less than $1 billion in net assets) will be required to 
begin submitting reports on Form N-PORT by April 30, 2020 (for the 
period ending March 31, 2020). See also Investment Company Reporting 
Modernization, Investment Company Act Release No. 32936 (Dec. 8, 
2017) [82 FR 58731 (Dec. 14, 2017)].

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 14455]]

    An issuer's Exchange Act record provides the basic source of 
information to the market and to potential purchasers, and investors in 
the secondary market use that information in making their investment 
decisions.\42\ Although all affected funds file reports under the 
Exchange Act, registered CEFs also file reports under the Investment 
Company Act. Investment Company Act reports also provide important 
information to the market and investors, including information about an 
affected fund's portfolio holdings that will be publicly reported on a 
quarterly basis on Form N-PORT. We believe that the market will analyze 
this portfolio holdings information in a similar manner to how it 
analyzes financial statements for operating companies to determine 
changes in prospects for growth and performance. Portfolio holdings 
disclosure on Form N-PORT, for example, provides important information 
that is comparable to information BDCs include in Exchange Act reports 
for purposes of providing a quarterly flow of key information to the 
market.\43\ Moreover, requiring registered CEFs to have timely filed 
their Investment Company Act reports would also provide parity among 
BDCs, registered CEFs, and operating companies. This is because once 
Form N-PORT fully replaces Form N-Q,\44\ registered CEFs will only file 
Exchange Act reports semi-annually on Form N-CSR, whereas BDCs and 
operating companies file Exchange Act reports quarterly on Forms 10-K 
and 10-Q.\45\ Under the proposal, all issuers would be required to have 
filed their quarterly and other required reports in order to file a 
short-form registration statement.\46\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \42\ See Shelf Registration, Securities Act Release No. 6499 
(Nov. 17, 1983) [48 FR 52889 (Nov. 23, 1983)]. See also Securities 
Offering Reform Adopting Release, supra footnote 5, at 44726 
(recognizing that an ``issuer's Exchange Act record provides the 
basic source of information to the market and to potential 
purchasers regarding the issuer and its management, business, 
financial condition, and prospects. Because an issuer's Exchange Act 
reports and other publicly available information form the basis for 
the market's evaluation of the issuer and the pricing of its 
securities, investors in the secondary market use that information 
in making their investment decisions.'').
    \43\ Exchange Act reports, such as reports on Form 10-Q or Form 
N-CSR, include information required by Regulation S-X. Certain 
reports on Form N-PORT must include the portfolio holdings 
information required by the schedules set forth in rules 12-12 
through 12-14 of Regulation S-X. See Part F of Form N-PORT. We also 
require reports on Form N-PORT to include, in a structured format, 
data elements that are otherwise required by Regulation S-X. See 
Reporting Modernization Release, supra footnote 41, at 81894.
    \44\ Form N-Q will be rescinded on May 1, 2020. See supra 
footnote 41.
    \45\ Reports on Form N-PORT with monthly information will be 
filed with the Commission on a quarterly basis, but only information 
reported for the third month of each fund's fiscal quarter on Form 
N-PORT will be publicly available (and not until 60 days after the 
end of the fiscal quarter).
    \46\ Affected funds historically must have timely filed reports 
on Forms N-Q and N-SAR for the preceding 12 months in order to rely 
on rule 415(a)(1)(x). This is because to rely on that rule, an 
issuer must have timely filed required Exchange Act reports and Form 
N-Q is, and Form N-SAR was, filed under both the Investment Company 
Act and section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Information Incorporated by Reference
    The same rules on incorporation by reference that apply to Form S-3 
registration statements would apply to a short-form registration 
statement filed on Form N-2.\47\ Specifically, an affected fund relying 
on the short-form registration instruction would be required to:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \47\ See section 803(c)(1) of the BDC Act (directing us to 
include an item or instruction that is similar to item 12 on Form S-
3 to provide that a BDC that would otherwise meet the requirements 
of Form S-3 shall incorporate by reference the reports and documents 
filed by the BDC under the Exchange Act into the registration 
statement of the BDC filed on Form N-2). We would eliminate current 
General Instruction F.3 of Form N-2 in its entirety and replace it 
with proposed General Instruction F.3. In these proposed provisions 
and others that are substantively identical to parallel provisions 
in Form S-3, we have proposed conforming references to a fund's SAI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Specifically incorporate by reference into the prospectus 
and statement of additional information (``SAI''): (1) Its latest 
annual report filed pursuant to section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the 
Exchange Act that contains financial statements for the registrant's 
latest fiscal year for which a Form N-CSR or Form 10-K was required to 
be filed; and (2) all other reports filed pursuant to sections 13(a) or 
15(d) of the Exchange Act since the end of the fiscal year covered by 
the annual report (backward incorporation by reference); \48\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \48\ Proposed General Instruction F.3.a(1)-(2) of Form N-2; cf. 
Item 12(a)(1)-(2) of Form S-3. In addition, if sales of a class of 
capital stock are to be registered on Form N-2 and the same class is 
registered under section 12 of the Exchange Act, the affected fund 
must incorporate by reference the description of the class contained 
in the Exchange Act registration statement with respect to that 
class (including any amendment or reports filed for the purpose of 
updating such description). Proposed General Instruction F.3.a(3) of 
Form N-2; cf. Item 12(a)(3) of Form S-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     State that all documents subsequently filed pursuant to 
sections 13(a), 13(c), 14, or 15(d) of the Exchange Act prior to the 
termination of the offering shall be deemed to be incorporated by 
reference into the prospectus and SAI (forward incorporation by 
reference).\49\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \49\ Proposed General Instruction F.3.b of Form N-2; cf. Item 
12(b) of Form S-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We also are proposing to allow an affected fund filing a short-form 
registration statement on Form N-2 to satisfy the disclosure 
requirements for its prospectus or SAI by incorporating the information 
by reference from Exchange Act reports.\50\ This approach, which is 
substantively identical to a parallel item in Form S-3, would give 
affected funds filing a short-form registration statement on Form N-2 
the option to either provide required disclosure directly in the 
prospectus or SAI or to satisfy Form N-2's disclosure requirements with 
information incorporated by reference.\51\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \50\ See proposed General Instruction F.3. The proposed 
amendments would permit a fund to use this incorporated information 
to provide the disclosure required by Items 3-13 and Items 16-24 of 
Form N-2. Proposed General Instruction F.3.c of Form N-2; cf. Item 
12(d) of Form S-3.
    \51\ The BDC Act directs that we extend this parallel item in 
Form S-3 (Item 12) to BDCs that meet Form S-3's requirements. See 
supra footnote 47; Item 12(d) of Form S-3; see also section 509(a) 
of the Registered CEF Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We considered requiring registered CEFs to incorporate by reference 
into their prospectuses and SAIs reports filed on Forms N-PORT and Form 
N-CEN. These forms provide important information to investors, other 
market participants, and Commission staff, and we propose including 
these forms in the timeliness requirement for registered CEFs to use 
the new short-form registration statement instruction.\52\ This 
information, however, is not specifically required disclosure under 
Form N-2, and so incorporating it by reference would not update the 
required disclosures on Form N-2. Taking this consideration into 
account, we are not proposing to require such incorporation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \52\ Proposed General Instruction A.2.b of Form N-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We are also proposing conforming changes to Form N-2's 
undertakings.\53\ Form N-2 currently requires an

[[Page 14456]]

undertaking that would prevent seasoned funds from incorporating 
information by reference as proposed because it requires these funds to 
file post-effective amendments in certain circumstances (and would do 
so regardless of whether the information had already been incorporated 
by reference).\54\ In contrast, operating companies registering on Form 
S-3 are not required to make this undertaking if the required 
information is included in an Exchange Act report incorporated by 
reference or in a prospectus supplement that is part of the 
registration statement.\55\ To implement the statutory mandate and 
provide parity for affected funds, we propose to amend Form N-2's 
undertakings to provide the same approach for affected funds filing a 
short-form registration statement on that form that applies to 
operating companies that file on Form S-3.\56\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \53\ See section 803(b)(2)(P) of the BDC Act (directing us to 
revise Item 34 of Form N-2 to require a BDC to provide undertakings 
that are no more restrictive than the undertakings that are required 
of a registrant pursuant to Item 512 of Regulation S-K, which are 
the undertakings that apply to an operating company registering an 
offering on Form S-3).
    \54\ Form N-2 currently requires an affected fund registering an 
offering under rule 415 to undertake to file, during any period in 
which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to 
the registration statement under certain circumstances, including to 
provide any prospectus required by section 10(a)(3) of the 
Securities Act. Item 34.4.a(1) of Form N-2.
    \55\ See Item 512(a)(iii)(B) of Regulation S-K [17 CFR 
229.512(a)(iii)(B)].
    \56\ Specifically, we propose to add a new provision to Item 
34.4.a of Form N-2 stating that the requirement to undertake to file 
a post-effective amendment would not apply if the registration 
statement is filed under the proposed short-form registration 
instruction and the information required to be included in a post-
effective amendment by Items 34.4.a(1)-(3) is contained in Exchange 
Act reports that are incorporated by reference into the fund's 
registration statement or is contained in a form of prospectus that 
is part of the registration statement. See proposed Item 34.4.a of 
Form N-2; cf. Item 512(a) of Regulation S-K.
     We also propose to revise Item 34 to make conforming changes to 
mirror parallel undertakings in Item 512 of Regulation S-K. See, 
e.g., proposed Item 34.4.a(2) of Form N-2; cf. Item 512(a)(1)(ii) of 
Regulation S-K; proposed Item 34.4.d(1) of Form N-2; cf. Item 
512(a)(5)(i) of Regulation S-K; proposed Item 34.4.e(2)-(3) of Form 
N-2; cf. Item 512(a)(6)(ii)-(iii) of Regulation S-K; proposed Item 
34.6 of Form N-2; cf. Item 512(b) of Regulation S-K; and proposed 
Item 34.7 of Form N-2; cf. Item 512(h) of Regulation S-K.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Affected Funds' Use of Rule 415(a)(1)(x) and Automatic Shelf 
Registration Statements
    We are proposing two additional amendments to allow affected funds 
to use the shelf registration system in parity with operating 
companies. First, we propose to amend rule 415(a)(1)(x) to clarify that 
affected funds may use that rule by adding references to a registration 
statement filed under the proposed short-form registration 
instruction.\57\ Second, we propose a new general instruction to permit 
affected funds that would be WKSIs under the proposed amendments to 
file an automatic shelf registration statement.\58\ A WKSI can register 
unspecified amounts of different types or classes of securities on an 
automatic shelf registration statement.\59\ The ability to use an 
automatic shelf registration statement means that the registration 
statement and any amendments will be effective immediately upon 
filing.\60\ Automatic shelf registration provides WKSIs with 
significant flexibility to take advantage of market windows, structure 
terms of securities on a real-time basis to accommodate investor 
demand, and determine or change the plan of distribution in response to 
changing market conditions. WKSIs using an automatic shelf registration 
statement also benefit by being able to pay filing fees at any time in 
advance of a shelf takedown or on a ``pay-as-you-go'' basis at the time 
of each takedown off the shelf registration statement in an amount 
calculated for that takedown.\61\ Our proposed amendments would extend 
these same benefits to affected funds that would be WKSIs under the 
proposed amendments, as directed by the BDC Act and the Registered CEF 
Act.\62\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \57\ See proposed rule 415(a)(1)(x) (revised to include 
securities registered pursuant to General Instruction A.2 of Form N-
2). See also section 803(b)(2)(J) of the BDC Act (directing us to 
revise rule 415(a)(1)(x) to provide that a BDC that would otherwise 
meet the eligibility requirements of Form S-3 can register its 
securities under that provision). We also are proposing to add a 
reference to a Form N-2 registration statement filed pursuant to 
General Instruction A.2 to rule 415(a)(2) to make clear that 
affected funds registering offerings pursuant to rule 415(a)(1)(ix), 
like other issuers relying on that provision, would not be subject 
to the limitation that they register an amount of securities that 
the issuer reasonably expected would be offered or sold within two 
years from the date that the registration statement became 
effective. Cf. Securities Offering Reform Adopting Release, supra 
footnote 5, at 44774-44775.
    \58\ See proposed General Instruction B of Form N-2; section 
803(c)(2) of the BDC Act (directing that we amend Form N-2 to 
include an instruction that is similar to the instruction regarding 
automatic shelf registration offerings by well-known seasoned 
issuers on Form S-3 to provide that a BDC that is a well-known 
seasoned issuer may file automatic shelf offerings on Form N-2). The 
proposed instruction would provide that an affected fund that is a 
WKSI may use the form as an automatic shelf registration statement 
only for the transactions that are described in, and consistent with 
the requirements of, General Instruction I.D of Form S-3. This 
provides parity with operating companies because General Instruction 
I.D of Form S-3 specifies the transactions and requirements for an 
automatic shelf registration statement filed on Form S-3. Consistent 
with General Instruction I.D of Form S-3, proposed General 
Instruction B specifies that the form could not be used as an 
automatic shelf registration statement for securities offerings 
under rule 415(a)(1)(vii) or (viii).
    \59\ See rule 430B(a) under the Securities Act [17 CFR 
230.430B(a)].
    \60\ See rule 462(e) and rule 462(f) under the Securities Act 
[17 CFR 230.462(e) and 17 CFR 230.462(f)].
    \61\ See rule 457(r) and rule 456(b) under the Securities Act 
[17 CFR 230.457(r) and 17 CFR 230.456(b)].
    \62\ We are proposing conforming amendments to Securities Act 
rule 462(f) and to the registration fee table in Form N-2 to enhance 
consistency with Form S-3 and to recognize that affected funds that 
would be WKSIs could use the pay-as-you-go registration fee process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We request comment on these proposed amendments, including:
     Do the proposed amendments provide parity to affected 
funds? Why or why not? Are there other changes that we should make that 
would provide parity for affected funds? What changes and why?
     Currently, Form S-3 under specified circumstances allows 
majority-owned subsidiaries of a parent issuer eligible to use Form S-3 
to register offerings of certain non-convertible securities or 
guarantees under General Instruction I.C of the form. Under the 
proposed amendments, an affected fund could use the new short-form 
registration instruction of Form N-2 to register the same types of 
offerings that operating companies can register on Form S-3, including 
offerings by majority-owned subsidiaries that are closed-end management 
investment companies eligible to register a securities offering on Form 
N-2. Is it appropriate to amend Form N-2 to provide a similar process 
for affected funds to register the same types of offerings by majority-
owned subsidiaries that operating companies can register on Form S-3? 
Would affected funds expect to register these offerings using the 
proposed short-form registration instruction? How do affected funds 
treat securities issued by majority-owned subsidiaries that are 
investment companies when calculating asset coverage under sections 18 
or 61 of the Investment Company Act? \63\ If affected funds do not 
include these securities in calculating asset coverage, why not?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \63\ 15 U.S.C. 80a-18 and 80a-60.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Rather than amending Form N-2, should we create a separate 
registration form specifically for affected funds to file a short-form 
registration statement?
     Should we require registered CEFs to have timely filed 
reports under section 30 of the Investment Company Act during the prior 
year in order to file a short-form registration on Form N-2, as 
proposed?
     We are proposing to allow an affected fund filing a short-
form registration statement on Form N-2 to satisfy the disclosure 
requirements for its prospectus or SAI by incorporating the information 
by reference from Exchange Act reports. Are there any

[[Page 14457]]

specific prospectus or SAI disclosure items that an affected fund 
should not be permitted to incorporate by reference into the 
registration statement? If so, which ones and why?
     An affected fund filing a short-form registration 
statement on Form N-2 would incorporate by reference into its 
prospectus and SAI certain past and future Exchange Act reports. This 
could increase an affected fund's liability with respect to information 
that has not previously been incorporated into its registration 
statement. Would this raise any concerns unique to affected funds? For 
example, is there any information in registered CEFs' annual and semi-
annual reports that should not be incorporated by reference? If so, 
which information and why?
     Are there any changes we should make to the registration 
process for interval funds? Should we, for example, permit them to 
forward incorporate if they would be eligible to rely on the proposed 
short-form registration instruction but for their lack of public float? 
Why or why not? Is there a basis to treat interval funds differently in 
this respect than any other issuer that does not have public float? 
Besides the additional flexibility in the aspects of the offering 
process that interval funds would receive under this proposal,\64\ are 
there any other ways in which we should modernize the offering process 
for interval fund offerings?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \64\ See supra footnote 16.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Unlisted BDCs and unlisted registered CEFs also would not 
generally have ``public float.'' Are there any changes we should make 
to the shelf registration process for these funds?
     Are there any other line items or language from Forms S-1 
or S-3 that we should include in Form N-2 to facilitate the 
incorporation by reference regime (or to otherwise enhance or modernize 
Form N-2 to provide parity with the operating company regime)? For 
example, is it necessary or useful to add a new item for ``Material 
Changes'' in Form N-2 that mirrors Item 11A of Form S-1 and Item 11(a) 
of Form S-3? \65\ Those items generally provide that, where a 
registrant is backward incorporating information by reference into a 
new registration statement, it must disclose in the registration 
statement any material changes that have not been disclosed in an 
Exchange Act report being incorporated by reference. Would it be 
necessary or useful to include a new item for ``Material Changes'' in 
Form N-2 to remind registrants that, as currently required, the new 
registration statement must include all material information? Would it 
elicit any disclosure that is not otherwise required by Form N-2's 
other items?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \65\ See Item 11A of Form S-1 (directing a registrant that 
elects to incorporate information by reference to describe any and 
all material changes in the registrant's affairs which have occurred 
since the end of the latest fiscal year for which audited financial 
statements were included in the latest Form 10-K and that have not 
been described in a Form 10-Q or Form 8-K filed under the Exchange 
Act); see also Item 11(a) of Form S-3 (describing parallel 
requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     We are not proposing to require that registered CEFs 
incorporate by reference reports filed on Forms N-PORT or N-CEN. Do 
commenters agree that this is appropriate? Conversely, should the 
reports on those forms be incorporated by reference? Should we permit 
or require a fund to incorporate the exhibit to certain reports on Form 
N-PORT that sets forth a registered CEF's complete portfolio holdings 
presented using the form and content specified by Regulation S-X? Would 
incorporating these reports allow funds to update any aspect of their 
registration statement and in that way avoid having to provide the same 
information through a prospectus supplement or post-effective 
amendment?
     Are there incorporation by reference provisions in any 
other registration forms filed by affected funds that should be 
modified to provide parity or consistency across registration 
statements, and if so, in what respect? For example, should we amend 
General Instruction G of Form N-14 to provide that BDCs may incorporate 
by reference to the same extent as registered CEFs? Would BDCs use this 
ability to incorporate information by reference?
     Proposed General Instruction B cross-references General 
Instructions II.E, F, and G and IV of Form S-3. These instructions 
explain the application of general rules and regulations. Cross-
referencing these instructions would direct registrants' attention to 
them without having to set forth the instructions in Form N-2 as well. 
Would it be clearer, however, to set forth the substance of those 
instructions in Form N-2?
b. Omitting Information From a Base Prospectus and Prospectus 
Supplements
    Affected funds registering securities in shelf offerings under 
Securities Act rule 415 can generally omit required information from 
the base prospectus that is unknown or not reasonably available to the 
fund when the registration statement becomes effective.\66\ Rule 430B 
also permits WKSIs and certain issuers eligible to use Form S-3 for 
primary offerings to omit certain additional information. A base 
prospectus that omits statutorily-required information is not a final 
prospectus under section 10(a) of the Securities Act.\67\ Filing a 
prospectus supplement is one way to provide information required for a 
prospectus to satisfy section 10(a).\68\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \66\ See Securities Act rule 409 [17 CFR 230.409].
    \67\ 15 U.S.C. 77j(a).
    \68\ Omitted information also may be provided in a post-
effective amendment or, where permitted, through Exchange Act 
filings that are incorporated by reference.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Our rules currently provide different processes for operating 
companies and investment companies to file prospectuses. Operating 
companies currently follow rule 424 to file prospectus supplements, 
whereas investment companies follow rule 497. Although these rules 
provide similar processes, they have certain key differences. For 
example, rule 424(b) is designed to work together with rule 
415(a)(1)(x), and provides additional time for an issuer to file a 
prospectus. Rule 497 does not contain provisions specifically related 
to offerings under rule 415(a)(1)(x) and requires the fund to file a 
prospectus with the Commission before using it. Rule 424 also requires 
an issuer to file a prospectus only if the issuer makes substantive 
changes from or additions to a previously-filed prospectus, whereas 
rule 497 requires funds to file every prospectus that varies from any 
previously-filed prospectus.
    In order to provide parity with operating companies, the BDC Act 
directs us to include a process for a BDC to file a prospectus in the 
same manner as under rule 424(b).\69\ Consistent with this directive 
and with the Registered CEF Act, we are proposing to amend rule 424(f) 
to allow affected funds to file a prospectus under rule 424.\70\ Under 
the proposed amendment, an affected fund would be able to file any type 
of prospectus enumerated in rule 424(b) to update, or to include 
information omitted from, a prospectus or in connection with a shelf 
takedown. We also are proposing to amend rule 497 to provide that rule 
424 would be the exclusive rule for affected funds to file a prospectus 
supplement other than an advertisement that is deemed to be a

[[Page 14458]]

prospectus under rule 482.\71\ This would avoid any confusion that 
might result if affected funds were permitted to file prospectuses 
under both rule 424 and rule 497, while also continuing to require 
affected funds to file rule 482 advertisements as they and other 
investment companies do today.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \69\ See section 803(b)(2)(K) of the BDC Act.
    \70\ The proposed amendments would not apply to open-end funds 
or other registered investment companies. Accordingly, those 
investment companies would continue to file prospectuses pursuant to 
rule 497. See proposed amendments to rule 424(f). We also are 
proposing to amend rule 424(f) to state that references to the term 
``form of prospectus'' in the rule includes the Statement of 
Additional Information.
    \71\ See proposed Securities Act rule 497(l).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We also are proposing an amendment to permit affected funds to use 
rule 430B in parity with operating companies. That rule permits an 
issuer to omit specified information from its base prospectus in two 
circumstances. First, a WKSI filing an automatic shelf registration 
statement can omit the plan of distribution and whether the offering is 
a primary one or an offering on behalf of selling security holders. An 
amendment to rule 430B is not required to achieve parity with respect 
to this first use because, once affected funds are permitted to qualify 
as WKSIs, those that are WKSIs would be able to rely on rule 430B as 
currently written. Second, the rule also applies to issuers eligible to 
file a registration statement on Form S-3 to register a primary 
offering, where the issuer is registering securities for selling 
security holders. In this case, the prospectus can omit the same 
information that WKSIs can omit, as well as the identities of selling 
security holders and the amount of securities to be registered on their 
behalf, subject to conditions. Unlike the first use, this second use 
would not be available to affected funds without a modification to the 
rule. Accordingly, we are proposing an amendment to allow affected 
funds eligible to register a primary offering under the proposed short-
form registration instruction to rely on rule 430B for this second use 
as well. In addition, affected funds relying on rule 430B, like 
operating companies, would undertake that for purposes of determining 
liability under the Securities Act with respect to any purchaser, each 
prospectus supplement is deemed part of the registration statement 
containing the base prospectus to which the supplement relates. This is 
measured as of the earlier of the date the prospectus supplement is 
first used after effectiveness or the date of the first contract of 
sale of securities in the offering described in the prospectus.\72\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \72\ See proposed rule 430B(b). Rules 430B, 424, and 158 specify 
when information contained in a prospectus supplement will be deemed 
part of and included in the registration statement and circumstances 
that will trigger a new effective date of the registration statement 
for purposes of section 11(a) of the Securities Act. These rules 
would apply to affected funds just as they apply to operating 
companies. We also are proposing to amend the undertakings in Form 
N-2 to require affected funds relying on rule 430B to make the same 
undertakings required of operating companies that rely on the rule. 
See proposed Item 34.4.d(1); cf. Item 512(a)(5)(i) of Regulation S-
K. See also supra footnote 53.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We request comment on these proposed amendments, including:
     Should we amend rule 424(f) as proposed to allow affected 
funds to file a prospectus under rule 424? Is this an effective means 
to implement the parity requirements of the BDC Act and Registered CEF 
Act? Why or why not?
     Are there additional amendments that we should make to 
rules 430B, 424, or 497 to allow affected funds to omit information 
from their base prospectuses and file prospectus supplements in parity 
with operating companies?
     Should we make rule 424 the exclusive rule under which 
affected funds must file prospectuses as proposed, or should we allow 
affected funds to have the option to file a prospectus under rule 424 
or rule 497? If we provided optionality, would that increase the 
potential to cause confusion for funds or investors? Are there any 
other consequences of requiring affected funds to use rule 424 that we 
should consider? Rather than require affected funds to use rule 424 as 
proposed, should we amend rule 497 to include the substantive 
requirements of rule 424 for affected funds?
c. Additional Information in Periodic Reports
    Under the proposed amendments, certain affected funds would be 
permitted to forward incorporate information from their Exchange Act 
reports. These funds may wish to include information in their periodic 
reports that is not required to be included in these reports in order 
to update their registration statements. We therefore propose to 
include a new instruction to Form N-2 that would allow a fund to 
include additional information so as long as the fund includes a 
statement in the report identifying information that it has included 
for this purpose.\73\ This would provide context for investors in 
considering this additional disclosure, akin to the context funds today 
provide investors when they mail prospectus ``stickers'' updating 
disclosure in the prospectus.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \73\ Proposed Instruction 6.i of Item 24 of Form N-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We request comment on this proposed instruction, including:
     Does the proposed instruction adequately provide a 
mechanism for affected funds to update their registration statements 
via their periodic reports?
     Does the proposed instruction provide sufficient guidance 
to an affected fund regarding whether and how it may include additional 
information in its periodic reports to update its registration 
statement, and how to identify that information?
     Is there any reason we should not permit affected funds to 
incorporate by reference information from their periodic reports that 
is not required to be included in those reports, or should we further 
prescribe how any additional information must be presented? Should we, 
for example, require that any additional information appear after the 
information affected funds are required to include in their annual 
reports?
     In addition to affected funds' periodic reports, should we 
also require an affected fund to identify information included in a 
report on Form 8-K filed for the purpose of updating the fund's 
registration statement?

C. Well-Known Seasoned Issuer Status

    We are proposing amendments that would allow an affected fund to 
qualify as a WKSI. In 2005, the Commission created a new category of 
issuer--a WKSI--that benefits to the greatest degree from the 
modifications to our rules regarding communications and the 
registration processes that the Commission adopted at that time.\74\ A 
WKSI, for example, can file a registration statement or amendment that 
becomes effective automatically in a broader variety of contexts than 
non-WKSIs. Subject to certain conditions, our rules also permit a WKSI 
to communicate at any time, including through a free writing 
prospectus, without violating the ``gun-jumping'' provisions of the 
Securities Act.\75\ In order for an issuer to qualify as a WKSI, the 
issuer must meet the registrant requirements of Form S-3, i.e., it must 
be ``seasoned,'' \76\ and generally must have at least $700 million in 
``public float.'' \77\ An issuer is ineligible for

[[Page 14459]]

WKSI status if, among other bases: (1) It is not current and timely in 
its Exchange Act reports, or (2) it is the subject of a judicial or 
administrative decree or order arising out of a governmental action 
involving violations of the anti-fraud provisions of the federal 
securities laws (the ``anti-fraud prong'' of the ineligible issuer 
definition).\78\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \74\ Securities Offering Reform Adopting Release, supra footnote 
5, at 44727.
    \75\ See infra Part II.E.1.
    \76\ See supra footnote 18.
    \77\ See paragraph (1)(i)(A) of the WKSI definition in rule 405 
(providing that the issuer must have at least $700 million in 
worldwide ``public float,'' that is, the market value of outstanding 
voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates). An 
alternative basis for an issuer to satisfy this requirement is to 
have issued, for cash, within the last three years, at least $1 
billion in aggregate principal amount of non-convertible securities 
through primary offerings registered under the Securities Act 
(paragraph (1)(i)(B) of the WKSI definition). The definition also 
includes provisions for transactions involving majority-owned 
subsidiaries (paragraph (1)(ii) of the WKSI definition).
    \78\ See paragraph (1)(i) and (1)(vi) of the definition of 
ineligible issuer in Securities Act rule 405.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The BDC Act directs us to revise Securities Act rule 405 to allow a 
BDC to qualify as a WKSI and the Registered CEF Act directs us to allow 
registered CEFs covered by the Act to use the securities offering rules 
that are available to operating companies.\79\ We are also proposing 
conforming amendments to the definition of an ``ineligible issuer.'' 
Specifically:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \79\ Section 803(b)(2)(A)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     First, the WKSI definition specifically excludes BDCs and 
registered investment companies. We propose to amend rule 405 so that 
the exclusion does not apply to affected funds.\80\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \80\ See proposed amendments to paragraph (1)(v) of rule 405.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Second, the WKSI definition currently provides that an 
issuer must meet the registrant requirements of Form S-3. We propose to 
add a parallel reference to the registrant requirements of the proposed 
short-form registration instruction.\81\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \81\ See proposed amendments to paragraph (1)(v) of the WKSI 
definition in rule 405. In addition, in certain places where the 
WKSI definition currently refers to Form S-3, we propose to add 
conforming references to a Form N-2 registration statement filed 
under proposed General Instruction A.2 of Form N-2. See proposed 
amendments to paragraph (1)(i) and (1)(i)(B)(2) of the definition of 
WKSI in rule 405. See proposed General Instruction A.2 of Form N-2. 
We also are proposing a conforming amendment to paragraph (2) of the 
definition of WKSI to add a reference to Form N-CSR, the form on 
which registered CEFs file their shareholder reports with the 
Commission. See proposed amendment to paragraph (2) of the 
definition of WKSI in Securities Act rule 405. See also infra Part 
II.D.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Third, we propose to amend the definition of ``ineligible 
issuer'' to provide that a registered CEF would be ineligible if it has 
failed to file all reports and materials required to be filed under 
section 30 of the Investment Company Act during the preceding 12 
months. This provision is consistent with the proposed short-form 
registration instruction and would mirror the current Exchange Act 
reporting provision in the ineligible issuer definition.\82\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \82\ See supra footnote 78.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Finally, we propose to amend the definition of ineligible 
issuer to give effect to the current anti-fraud prong in that 
definition in the context of affected funds. Specifically, we are 
proposing a parallel anti-fraud prong for affected funds. The current 
anti-fraud prong provides that an issuer that, within the past three 
years, was the subject of a judicial or administrative decree or order 
arising out of a governmental action involving violations of the anti-
fraud provisions of the federal securities laws would be an ineligible 
issuer.\83\ The proposed new anti-fraud prong for affected funds would 
provide that an affected fund would be an ineligible issuer if within 
the past three years its investment adviser, including any sub-adviser, 
was the subject of any judicial or administrative decree or order 
arising out of a governmental action, that determines that the 
investment adviser aided or abetted or caused the affected fund to have 
violated the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws.\84\ 
Investment companies typically are externally managed by an investment 
adviser, which is primarily responsible for the day-to-day management 
of the fund and the preparation of the fund's disclosures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \83\ See paragraph (1)(vi) of the ineligible issuer definition 
in rule 405.
    \84\ See proposed paragraph (1)(ix) of the ineligible issuer 
definition in rule 405. The proposed amendment's reference to an 
affected fund's investment adviser would include any sub-adviser. 
This is consistent with the Investment Company Act's definition of 
an ``investment adviser'' to an investment company, which includes 
sub-advisers. See section 2(a)(20) of the Investment Company Act. 
Cf. proposed Item 10.01 of Form 8-K (providing that an affected fund 
would be required to file a Form 8-K report if the fund's investment 
adviser, including any sub-adviser, has determined to implement a 
material change to the registrant's investment objectives or 
policies, and such change has not been, and will not be, submitted 
to shareholders for approval).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We considered proposing a different level of public float for an 
affected fund to qualify as a WKSI (or to file a short-form 
registration statement on Form N-2), or a different metric in lieu of 
an affected fund's public float, such as its net asset value for funds 
whose shares are not traded on an exchange.\85\ Either of these types 
of changes could permit additional affected funds to qualify as WKSIs 
and enjoy the associated benefits. The BDC Act and the Registered CEF 
Act, however, direct that we allow the funds covered by those Acts to 
use the rules available to operating companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \85\ We focus in this section on affected funds' public float 
because we believe that affected funds would be more likely to 
qualify for WKSI status on the basis of having $700 million or more 
in public float than to have to have issued, for cash, within the 
last three years, at least $1 billion in aggregate principal amount 
of non-convertible securities in registered offerings. See supra 
footnote 77.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, the WKSI definition, including its $700 million 
public float threshold, is meant to capture issuers that are 
presumptively the most widely followed in the marketplace and whose 
disclosures and other communications are subject to market scrutiny by 
investors, the financial press, analysts, and others.\86\ As a result 
of the active participation of these issuers in the markets and, among 
other things, the wide following of these issuers by market 
participants, the media, and institutional investors, the Commission 
has previously stated that it believes that it is appropriate to 
provide communications and registration flexibilities to WKSIs beyond 
that provided to other issuers, including other seasoned issuers.\87\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \86\ See id. at 44726-30.
    \87\ See id. at 44727.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In adopting the current $700 million public float threshold for 
WKSIs, the Commission observed that high levels of analyst coverage, 
institutional ownership, and trading volume are useful indicators of 
the scrutiny that an issuer receives from the market, recognizing that 
no one statistic can fully capture the extent to which an issuer is 
followed by the market.\88\ Operating company issuers with market 
capitalization in excess of $700 million that conducted offerings from 
1997 to 2004 typically had an average of 12 analysts following them 
prior to the offering, which the Commission observed was likely a 
conservative indicator of analyst scrutiny because it included only 
sell-side analysts.\89\ Institutional investors accounted for an 
average of 52% of equity ownership prior to offerings by issuers with 
market capitalization above $700 million; these issuers had an average 
daily trading volume of nearly $52 million prior to offerings in this 
period; and these issuers accounted for significant percentages of 
capital raised (e.g., 70% of equity capital raised from 1997 to 
2004).\90\ The Commission observed that the issuers that would meet the 
thresholds for WKSI status are the most active issuers in the U.S. 
public capital markets.\91\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \88\ See id. at 44728.
    \89\ Id.
    \90\ Id.
    \91\ Id. at 44727.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Affected funds, in contrast, have limited analyst coverage relative 
to operating companies and many have high levels of retail, rather than 
institutional, investors.\92\ Affected funds

[[Page 14460]]

have relatively modest daily trading volumes: For example, the average 
daily dollar volume of a listed affected fund (a listed BDC or listed 
registered CEF) prior to offerings was $3.8 million in 2017, and listed 
affected funds represented less than one percent of the daily dollar 
trading volume on the New York Stock Exchange and NASDAQ in 2017.\93\ 
Affected funds also do not account for significant percentages of 
capital raised, with affected funds (listed and non-listed) raising 
about two percent of the total capital raised in 2017 in registered 
offerings.\94\ Based on our consideration of the same criteria the 
Commission evaluated in 2005, we do not believe that affected funds 
would be likely to have a level of market following at lower levels of 
public float than operating companies that would justify a lower public 
float threshold or alternative metric to qualify as a WKSI. We also are 
not aware of alternative indicia of a market following for affected 
funds or any particular type of affected funds that would suggest a 
lower public float threshold, or alternative metric in lieu of public 
float, would be appropriate. We believe these same considerations also 
support our proposal to require affected funds to have the same level 
of public float to file a short-form registration statement--currently 
$75 million--that applies to operating companies.\95\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \92\ For example, listed BDCs having on average six security 
analysts following them as of December 2017, and listed registered 
CEFs having on average zero security analysts following them as of 
December 2017. Data on analyst coverage is taken from the I/B/E/S 
database (Thomson Reuters).
    \93\ Data on daily trading volume is taken from the TAQ 
database. Data on securities offerings is taken from taken from 
Securities Data Corporation's New Issues database (Thomson Reuters). 
We estimated affected funds' average daily trading volume during a 
period of a month prior to a securities offering. See also infra 
footnote 383 and accompanying text (discussing institutional 
ownership of affected funds and operating companies).
    \94\ Data on registered securities offerings are taken from 
Securities Data Corporation's New Issues database (Thomson Reuters).
    \95\ See supra footnote 33 (explaining that there are other 
bases to file a short-form registration statement on Form S-3 that 
do not require an issuer to have $75 million in public float and 
that these other bases would also be available to affected funds 
filing a short-form registration statement on Form N-2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Indeed, based on the general level of affected funds' analyst 
coverage, trading volume, and capital raised, we considered whether the 
public float threshold should be higher for affected funds than for 
operating companies. We determined not to propose a higher threshold, 
however, because we believe the same public float threshold for all 
issuers would be consistent with the general directive in the BDC Act 
and the Registered CEF Act to provide the funds covered in those Acts 
the securities offerings rules available to operating companies.
    We also considered whether to propose any modifications to the way 
that an affected fund would calculate its public float. The Commission 
recently adopted new Securities Act rule 139b to permit broker-dealers 
to publish ``covered investment fund research reports,'' which include 
reports covering affected funds.\96\ In that rulemaking the Commission 
determined not to require broker-dealers to exclude shares held by the 
fund's affiliates from the calculation of the fund's public float.\97\ 
Our approach to the public float calculation in rule 139b, however, was 
designed to address operational challenges broker-dealers could 
experience in obtaining affiliate shareholder information.\98\ Affected 
funds should not experience the same operational difficulties in 
calculating their own public float. Indeed, BDCs currently disclose 
their public float net of affiliate holdings on Form 10-K, and 
registered CEFs (as well as BDCs) that conduct offerings under rule 
415(a)(1)(x) currently must determine their public float net of 
affiliate holdings to evaluate their eligibility to use that rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \96\ See infra Part II.E.2.
    \97\ In new rule 139b, consistent with this proposal, we 
generally provided that issuers covered in research reports 
published under the rule must have the same level of public float 
required for research reports on operating companies.
    \98\ See Covered Investment Fund Research Reports, Securities 
Act Release No. 10580 (Nov. 30, 2018) [83 FR 26788 (Dec. 13, 2018)] 
(``CIFRR Adopting Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Not all affected funds will have public float or the level of 
public float required to be a WKSI or to file a short-form registration 
statement. For example, unlisted funds, including interval funds, will 
generally not have public float. However, the same is true for 
operating companies. For example there are many unlisted real estate 
investment trusts that do not have a public float and cannot qualify as 
a WKSI.\99\ An unlisted affected fund, like an unlisted operating 
company, could list its shares and qualify as a WKSI or use a short-
form registration statement if it had the requisite public float and 
met the other requirements. We request comment in this release on 
extending the benefits of particular reforms to affected funds that 
would not qualify because they do not have the requisite public 
float.\100\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \99\ The determination of public float is based on a public 
trading market, such as an exchange or certain over-the-counter 
markets. See Securities Offering Reform Adopting Release, supra 
footnote 5, at n.50.
    \100\ See, e.g., supra footnotes 35-37 and accompanying text; 
requests for comment in supra Part II.B.2.a (requesting comment on 
whether we should make any changes to the registration process for 
interval funds that do not list their securities on an exchange and 
do not have public float).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We request comment generally on the proposed amendments to the WKSI 
and ineligible issuer definitions, including:
     Would these proposed amendments to the WKSI definition 
provide parity to affected funds? Why or why not? Are there other 
revisions that we should make to the definition to achieve that 
objective?
     Are the proposed amendments to the definition of 
ineligible issuer appropriate, and would they help give effect to the 
current anti-fraud prong of the ineligible issuer definition in the 
context of affected funds, in light of funds' management structure? If 
not, what approach would better give effect to the anti-fraud prong in 
the context of affected funds? Are the proposed amendments clear, and 
would issuers understand what it means for an investment adviser, 
including any sub-adviser, to have aided or abetted or caused the 
issuer to have violated the anti-fraud provisions of the federal 
securities laws? If not, how should we change, or provide guidance on, 
the proposed provision? For example, should we clarify how the proposed 
ineligible issuer definition would apply to a fund where the investment 
adviser, including any sub-adviser, aided, abetted, or caused the fund 
to have violated certain anti-fraud provisions within the three-year 
look-back period that the proposed definition specifies, and then the 
fund selected a new investment adviser within this same period?
     The activities of affected funds, unlike those of 
operating companies, are substantively regulated under the Investment 
Company Act. For example, certain provisions of the Investment Company 
Act directly govern the operations of investment companies, such as 
prohibitions on management self-dealing,\101\ breaches of fiduciary 
duty,\102\ or changes in an investment company's business or investment 
policies without shareholder approval.\103\ Neither the current 
ineligible issuer definition in rule 405 nor our proposed amendments to 
the definition would cover substantive provisions of the Investment 
Company Act that do not involve a violation of the anti-fraud 
provisions of the federal securities laws. Should we expand the 
definition of ineligible issuer to include violations of non-antifraud 
provisions of

[[Page 14461]]

the Investment Company Act? If so, which provisions of the Investment 
Company Act? For example, should an affected fund be ineligible if it 
is the subject of a judicial or administrative decree involving 
violations of the self-dealing provisions of section 17 or 57 of the 
Investment Company Act, or such a decree involving violations of the 
asset coverage requirements of section 18 or 61 of the Investment 
Company Act?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \101\ See section 17 of the Investment Company Act [15 U.S.C. 
80a-17].
    \102\ See section 36 of the Investment Company Act [15 U.S.C. 
80a-35].
    \103\ See section 13 of the Investment Company Act [15 U.S.C. 
80a-13].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Should we adopt a different level of public float for an 
affected fund to qualify as a WKSI (or to file a short-form 
registration statement on Form N-2), or a different metric in lieu of 
an affected fund's public float? If so, which level or metric and why?
     Should we, for example, provide for a different metric for 
interval funds, whose shares are generally not listed on an exchange, 
or for other unlisted affected funds? If so, which metric and why? For 
example, would it be appropriate to allow these funds to use their net 
asset values in lieu of or in addition to public float? Do interval 
funds or other unlisted affected funds with net asset values of $700 
million or more (or $75 million or more) have a similar degree of 
market following and scrutiny as listed issuers with comparable amounts 
of public float? Are there other metrics tailored to affected funds 
that would indicate a similar degree of market following and scrutiny 
as listed issuers with comparable amounts of public float? Would it be 
appropriate to provide more advantageous provisions for interval funds 
or other types of affected funds relative to operating companies? 
Should we adopt any differences in the way that an affected fund would 
calculate its public float?

D. Final Prospectus Delivery Reforms

    We propose to apply the alternative delivery method for operating 
company final prospectuses to affected funds. As a result, an affected 
fund would be allowed to satisfy its final prospectus delivery 
obligations by filing its final prospectus with the Commission.
    The Securities Act requires registrants to deliver to each investor 
in a registered offering a prospectus meeting the requirements of 
section 10(a) (known as a ``final prospectus'').\104\ Section 5(b)(2) 
makes it unlawful to deliver a security for the purpose of sale or for 
delivery after sale unless accompanied or preceded by a final 
prospectus. After the effective date of a registration statement, a 
written communication that offers a security for sale, or confirms the 
sale of a security, may be provided to investors if a final prospectus 
is sent or given previously or at the same time. Otherwise, such a 
communication is a prospectus and may not be provided unless it meets 
the requirements of section 10(a).\105\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \104\ 15 U.S.C. 77j(a).
    \105\ 15 U.S.C. 77e(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 172 allows issuers, brokers, and dealers to satisfy final 
prospectus delivery obligations if a final prospectus is or will be on 
file with the Commission within the time required by the rules and 
other conditions are satisfied.\106\ For example, rule 172 provides 
that a final prospectus will be deemed to precede or accompany a 
security for sale for purposes of section 5(b)(2) as long as the final 
prospectus is filed with the Commission or it will be filed as part of 
the registration statement.\107\ Rule 172 applies only to final 
prospectuses and not to other documents.\108\ Rule 173 requires a 
notice stating that a sale of securities was made pursuant to a 
registration statement or in a transaction in which a final prospectus 
would have been required to have been delivered in the absence of rule 
172.\109\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \106\ 17 CFR 230.172; see also Securities Offering Reform 
Adopting Release, supra footnote 5, at 44783.
    \107\ See id. In the event that the issuer fails to file such a 
prospectus in a timely manner, the issuer must file the prospectus 
as soon as practicable thereafter. 17 CFR 230.172(c)(3); see also 
Securities Offering Reform Adopting Release, supra footnote 5, at 
44784 (summarizing the effect of this ``cure'' provision).
    \108\ Id. at 44784.
    \109\ 17 CFR 230.173. This notification enables investors to 
``trace'' their purchases of securities for purposes of asserting 
their rights under the liability provisions of the federal 
securities laws. See Securities Offering Reform Adopting Release, 
supra footnote 5, at 44784. Rule 173(d) provides that a purchaser 
who receives a notification may request a copy of the final 
prospectus. We are proposing a conforming change to current Item 
34.6 of Form N-2, under which funds currently undertake to provide 
an SAI upon request, to also require an affected fund to undertake 
to provide a prospectus upon request. See proposed Item 34.8 of Form 
N-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, affected funds are specifically excluded from the 
issuers that may rely on these rules.\110\ The BDC Act directs us to 
remove this exclusion for BDCs.\111\ To implement the BDC Act, and to 
provide parity for registered CEFs consistent with the Registered CEF 
Act, we propose to amend rules 172 and 173 to remove the exclusion for 
offerings by affected funds.\112\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \110\ See rule 172(d)(1)-(2) under the Securities Act [17 CFR 
230.172(d)(1)-(2)]; rule 173(f)(2)-(3) under the Securities Act [17 
CFR 230.173(f)(2)-(3)].
    \111\ Section 803(b)(2)(L) of the BDC Act; see also section 
509(a) of Registered CEF Act (requiring parity of securities 
offering rules with operating companies for listed registered CEFs 
and interval funds).
    \112\ See proposed rule 172(d) under the Securities Act; 
proposed rule 173(f) under the Securities Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We request comment on the proposed revisions to the final 
prospectus delivery rules.
     Are the proposed revisions to rules 172 and 173 
appropriately tailored to affected funds? Should we add additional 
conditions to reliance on rule 172 for some or all affected funds? If 
so, which ones and why? For example, should we limit the availability 
of rule 172 only to affected funds that have timely filed all reports 
and other materials required under the Exchange Act and/or Investment 
Company Act for a certain period of time prior to reliance on the rule? 
As another example, should we limit the availability of rule 172 only 
to seasoned funds that file a short-form registration statement on Form 
N-2, or to funds that qualify for WKSI status?

E. Communications Reforms

1. Offering Communications
    The Securities Act restricts the types of offering communications 
that issuers or other parties subject to the Act's provisions may use 
in connection with a registered public offering.\113\ These provisions, 
which we refer to as the ``gun-jumping provisions,'' were designed to 
make the statutorily mandated prospectus the primary means for 
investors to obtain information regarding a registered securities 
offering.\114\ Accordingly, unless otherwise permitted:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \113\ Unless otherwise noted, offering communications generally 
refer to written communications. Rule 405 provides that ``[e]xcept 
as otherwise specifically provided or the context otherwise 
requires, a written communication is any communication that is 
written, printed, a radio or television broadcast, or a graphic 
communication as defined in [rule 405].'' 17 CFR 230.405.
    \114\ See Securities Offering Reform Adopting Release, supra 
footnote 5, at 44731.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Before an issuer files a registration statement, all 
offers, in whatever form, are prohibited; \115\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \115\ See Securities Act section 5(c) [15 U.S.C. 77e(c)].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     After the issuer files a registration statement but before 
it has become effective, the only written offers that are permitted are 
those made using a preliminary prospectus that meets the requirements 
of section 10 of the Securities Act, which must be filed with the 
Commission; \116\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \116\ This is because after the filing of the registration 
statement but before its effectiveness, offers made in writing 
(including electronically), by radio, or by television are limited 
to a ``statutory prospectus'' that conforms to the information 
requirements of Securities Act section 10. See Securities Act 
section 5(b)(1) [15 U.S.C. 77e(b)(1)] and Securities Act section 10 
[15 U.S.C.77j].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Even after the registration statement is declared 
effective, offering participants still may make written offers only 
through a statutory

[[Page 14462]]

prospectus, except that they may use additional written offering 
materials if a final prospectus that meets the requirements of 
Securities Act section 10(a) is sent or given prior to or with those 
materials.\117\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \117\ See Securities Act section 2(a)(10) [15 U.S.C. 77b(a)(10)] 
and section 5(b)(1) [15 U.S.C. 77e(b)(1)].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission has previously adopted rules that provide operating 
companies and other parties (such as underwriters) increased 
flexibility in their communications as compared to the limitations 
described above.\118\ The Commission adopted these rules, which we 
refer to as the ``communications rules,'' because the Commission 
believed that investors and the market could benefit from access to 
greater communications under conditions that preserve important 
investor protections. These communication rules, however, are generally 
not available to affected funds, which are subject to a separate 
framework governing communications with investors.\119\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \118\ See, e.g., Securities Offering Reform Adopting Release, 
supra footnote 5, at 44731. See also rules 134 [17 CFR 230.134], 138 
[17 CFR 203.138], 139 [17 CFR 230.139], 156 [17 CFR 230.156], 163 
[17 CFR 230.163], 163A [17 CFR 230.163A], 164 [17 CFR 230.164], 168 
[17 CFR 230.168], 169 [17 CFR 230.169], and 433 [17 CFR 230.433].
    \119\ See Securities Offering Reform Adopting Release, supra 
footnote 5, at n.115 and accompanying text. Certain of the 
communications rules expressly exclude registered investment 
companies and BDCs from the types of issuers that may rely on them. 
See, e.g., rules 134(g) [17 CFR 230.134(g)], 163(b)(3)(ii)-(iii) [17 
CFR 230.163(b)(3)(ii)-(iii)], 163A(b)(4)(i)-(ii) [17 CFR 
230.163A(b)(4)(i)-(ii)], 164(f) [17 CFR 230.164(f)], 168(d)(3) [17 
CFR 230.168(d)(3)], and 169(d)(4) [17 CFR 230.169(d)(4)]. Other 
communications rules, such as rule 139, do not expressly exclude 
registered investment companies and BDCs but include conditions that 
can make them unavailable for affected funds. See also CIFRR 
Adopting Release, supra footnote 98 at 64183 (adopting new rule 139b 
which covers a broker-dealers' distribution of research reports 
concerning ``covered investment funds,'' which includes registered 
investment companies and BDCs).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The BDC Act directs us to allow BDCs to use the same communications 
rules available to operating companies, generally by removing a BDC 
from the list of issuers that are ineligible for the exemptions 
provided by these rules.\120\ To implement the BDC Act, and to provide 
parity for registered CEFs consistent with the Registered CEF Act, we 
propose to remove the exclusions for affected funds from the following 
rules and to make other conforming changes.\121\ These proposed 
amendments would:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \120\ See section 803(b)(2)(B)-(E) and 803(b)(2)(G)-(I) of the 
BDC Act, supra footnote 8. See also section 509(a) of the Registered 
CEF Act, supra footnote 11 (requiring parity of securities offering 
rules with operating companies for listed registered CEFs and 
interval funds).
    \121\ See proposed rules 134(g), 163(b)(3), 163A(b)(4) 164(f), 
168(d)(3), and 169(d)(4) (removing references to BDCs and limiting 
the rules' exclusion of registered investment companies from the 
safe harbor to exclude registered funds other than registered CEFs).
    See also conforming amendments to proposed rule 168 (proposing 
to add to paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) references to the Investment 
Company Act to parallel current references to the Exchange Act to 
provide that forward-looking information and factual business 
information may be included in materials filed under the Investment 
Company Act); proposed rule 433 (proposing to add to paragraphs 
(a)(1)(i) and (iv) references to registration statements filed on 
Form N-2 under proposed General Instruction A.2 to parallel current 
references to Form S-3; proposing to add to paragraph (c)(1)(ii) a 
reference to reports filed under section 30 of the Investment 
Company as reports with which a free-writing prospectus may not 
conflict). See also proposed rule 156(d), infra footnote 124.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Permit affected funds to use certain communications 
prescribed by rule 134 to publish factual information about the issuer 
or the offering, including ``tombstone ads.'' \122\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \122\ Rule 134 generally provides that the terms ``prospectus'' 
as defined in section 2(a)(10) of the Securities Act or ``free 
writing prospectus'' as defined in Rule 405 shall not include a 
communication limited to the statements required or permitted by the 
rule, provided that the rule 134 communications are published or 
transmitted to any person only after a registration statement has 
been filed that includes a prospectus satisfying the requirement of 
section 10 of the Securities Act, except as otherwise provided in 
the rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Permit affected funds to rely on rule 163A, which provides 
issuers a bright-line time period, ending 30 days prior to filing a 
registration statement, during which they may communicate without risk 
of violating the gun-jumping provisions.\123\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \123\ Rule 163A provides that a communication that meets the 
rule's conditions is not an ``offer'' for purposes of Securities Act 
section 5(c). The Commission has explained that, because rule 163A 
provides a safe harbor from the application of Securities Act 
section 5(c), it necessarily applies only prior to the filing of a 
registration statement. This exclusion will thus not apply to 
issuers offering securities off a shelf registration statement on 
file, whether or not effective, as the prohibition in section 5(c) 
does not apply to the offering of the securities covered by such 
shelf registration statement. See Securities Offering Reform 
Adopting Release, supra footnote 5, at n.155.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Permit affected funds that are reporting companies to rely 
on rule 168 to publish or disseminate regularly released factual 
business information and forward-looking information at any time, 
including around the time of a registered offering.\124\ Rule 169 would 
also permit affected funds' continued publication or dissemination of 
regularly released factual business information that is intended for 
use by persons other than in their capacity as investors or potential 
investors.\125\ We also are proposing to amend rule 156 to state that 
nothing in that rule may be construed to prevent an affected fund from 
qualifying for an exemption under rules 168 or 169.\126\ The contents 
of any rule 168 or 169 communication would remain subject to the anti-
fraud provisions of the federal securities laws.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \124\ Rule 168 is a safe harbor from the definition of 
``prospectus'' in Securities Act section 2(a)(10) and, therefore, 
prevents the application of the prohibition in Securities Act 
section 5(b)(1) on the use of a prospectus that is not a statutory 
prospectus. Rule 168 also is a safe harbor from the prohibitions on 
pre-filing ``offers'' in Securities Act section 5(c).
    \125\ Rule 169 is also a safe harbor from the definition of 
``prospectus'' in Securities Act section 2(a)(10).
    \126\ See proposed rule 156(d); section 803(b)(2)(G) of the BDC 
Act; section 509(a) of Registered CEF Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Permit affected funds to rely on rules 164 and 433 to use 
a ``free writing prospectus.'' \127\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \127\ Rules 164 and 433 provide that a free writing prospectus 
is a permitted prospectus for purposes of section 10(b) of the 
Securities Act and can be used without violating section 5(b)(1) of 
the Securities Act only after a registration statement related to 
the offering has been filed. [17 CFR 230.164 and 17 CFR 230.433]. 
See also Securities Offering Reform Adopting Release, supra footnote 
5, at 44744. Rule 433(a) further provides that a free writing 
prospectus is a prospectus permitted under section 10(b) for 
purposes of sections 2(a)(10) and 5(b)(2) of the Securities Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Permit affected funds that are WKSIs to engage at any time 
in oral and written communications, including use at any time of a free 
writing prospectus (before or after a registration statement is filed), 
subject to the same conditions applicable to other WKSIs.\128\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \128\ A WKSI can: (1) Rely on the bright-line time period 
provided by rule 163A for communications made more than 30 days 
before a registration statement is filed and that do not reference a 
securities offering that is or will be the subject of a registration 
statement; (2) subject to specified conditions, rely on the 
exemption in rule 163 from the prohibition on offers before the 
filing of a registration statement to engage in written or oral 
communications, including use at any time of a free writing 
prospectus, made by or on behalf of eligible WKSIs; (3) disseminate 
regularly released factual and forward-looking information at any 
time, including around the time of a registered offering, in 
reliance on rule 168; (4) issue a broader category of routine 
communications set forth in rule 134 regarding issuers, offerings, 
and procedural matters, that are excluded from the definition of 
``prospectus,'' and (5) use a free writing prospectus after a 
registration statement is filed in reliance on rules 164 and 433.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Investment company communications currently are subject to rule 482 
under the Securities Act. Rule 482 communications, or ``ads,'' can only 
be used by a fund that is selling or is proposing to sell its 
securities pursuant to a filed registration statement.\129\ Some of the 
communications rules we propose to amend, in contrast, permit an issuer 
to communicate before it has filed a registration statement. In 
addition, a rule 482 ad, like the free-writing prospectuses that we 
propose to permit affected funds to use, is a prospectus subject to 
prospectus liability under section 12 of the Securities Act. Some

[[Page 14463]]

communications rules we propose to extend to affected funds, however, 
deem permissible communications not to be prospectuses, such as rule 
134 communications. The proposed amendments to the communications rules 
would therefore provide incremental flexibility to affected funds in 
their communications. Funds would have additional flexibility to 
communicate before filing a registration statement, and they would have 
some additional flexibility in using communications that are not 
subject to prospectus liability under section 12 of the Securities Act. 
Affected funds would be permitted to take advantage of this additional 
flexibility or to continue to rely on rule 482 and other rules 
currently applicable to investment company communications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \129\ 17 CFR 230.482; see also 17 CFR 230.497(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We request comment on the proposed amendments to the communication 
rules:
     Are there other changes we should make to the 
communication rules to permit affected fund communications under those 
rules? Which changes and why?
     Are there changes we should make, or guidance we should 
provide, regarding the application of the conditions in the 
communication rules to affected fund communications?
     Are there any changes we should make to rule 482 regarding 
the communications that affected funds can make using the rule? Which 
provisions and why? Should we include any standardized performance 
presentation requirements for affected funds in rule 482? If so, should 
they differ in any way from open-end funds' performance presentation 
requirements already required by rule 482? Rather than or in addition 
to any changes to rule 482, should we amend the communications rules to 
require that any affected fund communication, such as a free writing 
prospectus, that contains performance information must present that 
information in accordance with standardized presentation requirements? 
If so, should these standardized presentation requirements be the same 
as those that are included in rule 482, replicate the instructions to 
Item 4.1.g set forth in Form N-2,\130\ or differ from either of these 
sets of requirements in any way?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \130\ See, e.g., Securities Act rule 139b(a)(3) [17 CFR 
230.139b(a)(3)] requiring that the performance of certain covered 
investment funds, including registered CEFs, to be presented in 
accordance with certain standardized presentation requirements. Rule 
139b requires that a registered CEF's performance be presented in 
accordance with the instructions to Item 4.1.g of Form N-2. Id. 
Other historical measures of fund performance are also permitted, so 
long as the other measures are set out with no greater prominence. 
Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     As discussed above, rules 163, 163A, 168, and 169 all 
permit issuers to engage in specified communications prior to, or 
during, the filing of a registration statement. Would affected funds 
rely on these rules, as proposed to be amended, in practice? If so, 
what types of communications would affected funds make in reliance on 
these rules? Are there any additional changes to these rules that we 
should make to tailor them to affected fund communications?
     Rule 134 deems certain permitted communications not to be 
prospectuses. Should we make any additional changes to tailor this rule 
to affected fund communications? For example, should we explicitly 
include the fund's investment adviser as permissible information to 
disclose in paragraph (a) of rule 134? Should we expand rule 134(a)(3) 
to include the business of affected funds, or is 134(a)(3)(iv) 
sufficient? \131\ Why or why not? What other information specific to 
affected funds should we permit that would be consistent with the 
intent of rule 134 communications?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \131\ Rule 134(a)(3) currently permits an issuer to provide a 
brief indication of the general type of business it engages in, but 
restricts that information according to the type of business 
involved. The rule provides specific requirements for certain types 
of companies (e.g., manufacturing companies), as well as a catch-all 
provision in paragraph (a)(3)(iv) for companies in a business that 
is not specifically enumerated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     In 2003, the Commission removed certain investment-company 
specific provisions from rule 134 on the basis that rule 134 was 
unnecessary for investment company communications in light of the 
amendments we adopted to rule 482 at that time.\132\ For example, prior 
rule 134 permitted investment companies to provide a brief indication 
of the general type of business of the issuer, but with specified 
limitations tailored to investment companies.\133\ Should we restore 
some or all of the pre-2003 investment company related provisions of 
rule 134? Which provisions and why? When the Commission eliminated 
these provisions in rule 134, it reasoned that the standard of 
liability that attaches to a fund advertisement should not depend on 
the content of the advertisement and that it did not believe exactly 
the same content should be subject to different liability standards 
depending on whether that content is included in a rule 134 
advertisement or a rule 482 advertisement.\134\ How should we balance 
these considerations in considering any further changes to rule 134?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \132\ See Amendments to Investment Company Advertising Rules, 
Securities Act Release No. 8294 (Oct. 3, 2003) [68 FR 57760 (Oct. 6, 
2003)] (``Advertising Rules Amendments Adopting Release'').
    \133\ See prior rule 134(a)(3)(iii).
    \134\ See Advertising Rules Amendments Adopting Release, supra 
footnote 132, at 57761-6262.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Rules 164 and 433 allow issuers to communicate through a 
free writing prospectus after an issuer files a registration statement. 
What types of communications would an affected fund make in reliance on 
rules 164 and 433? How, if at all, would they differ from 
communications affected funds currently make under rule 482? Should we 
provide for an anti-staleness provision similar to rule 482(g) \135\ of 
the Securities Act with respect to any discussion of performance by 
affected funds in a free writing prospectus? Why or why not?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \135\ Rule 482(g) [17 CFR 230.482(g)] is an anti-staleness 
provision providing in part that ``[a]ll performance data contained 
in any advertisement must be as of the most recent practicable date 
considering the type of investment company and the media through 
which the data will be conveyed. . . .''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Broker-Dealer Research Reports
    The BDC Act also directs us to amend rules 138 and 139 to 
specifically include a BDC as an issuer to which those rules apply, and 
the Registered CEF Act directs us to allow certain registered CEFs to 
use the securities offering rules that are available to other issuers 
that are required to file reports under section 13(a) or section 15(d) 
of the Exchange Act.\136\ Rule 138 permits a broker-dealer 
participating in a distribution of an issuer's common stock and similar 
securities to publish or distribute research about that issuer's fixed 
income securities, and vice versa, if it publishes or distributes that 
research in the regular course of its business.\137\ Although rule 138 
does not currently exclude affected funds from coverage, it does 
include references to Form S-3 but not Form N-2. We therefore propose 
to amend the rule's references to shelf registration statements filed 
on Form S-3 to include a parallel reference to a

[[Page 14464]]

registration statement filed on Form N-2 under the proposed short-form 
registration instruction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \136\ See section 803(b)(2)(F) of the BDC Act, supra footnote 8. 
See also section 509(a) of the Registered CEF Act, supra footnote 
11.
    \137\ See 17 CFR 230.138. Specifically, a research report 
published or distributed by a broker or dealer is not considered an 
offer for sale or an offer to sell a security that is the subject of 
an offering for purposes of section 2(a)(10) and 5(c) of the 
Securities Act even if the broker or dealer participates in the 
distribution of the issuer's securities, so long as the research 
report relates to securities that are not equivalent, as defined by 
the rule, to the securities being distributed. See rule 138(a). A 
broker-dealer's publication or distribution of a research report in 
reliance on rule 138 would therefore be deemed not to constitute an 
offer that otherwise could be a non-conforming prospectus in 
violation of section 5 of the Securities Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 138 also currently provides that an issuer covered in a 
research report published in reliance on the rule must be required to 
file reports, and have filed all periodic reports required during the 
preceding 12 months (or such shorter time that the issuer was required 
to file such reports), on Forms 10-K and 10-Q.\138\ This requirement is 
designed to ensure that all reporting issuers are current in their 
periodic reports at the time a broker-dealer relies on the 
exemption.\139\ Because registered CEFs do not file the periodic 
reports currently specified in rule 138, we propose to include parallel 
references to the reports that registered CEFs are required to file, 
i.e., reports on Forms N-CSR, N-Q,\140\ N-CEN, and N-PORT.\141\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \138\ See rule 138(a)(2)(i) [17 CFR 230.138(a)(2)(i)].
    \139\ See Securities Offering Reform Adopting Release, supra 
footnote 5, at 44763 (amending rule 138 to require that all issuers 
covered in a research report under rule 138, and not just those that 
file on Forms S-3 or F-3, be current and timely in filing their 
periodic reports).
    \140\ See supra footnotes 41 and 44 (Form N-Q will be rescinded 
on May 1, 2020). See also infra Part VIII (instruction 6 under Text 
of Proposed Rules and Amendments).
    \141\ Reports on Form N-PORT for each month will be filed with 
the Commission on a quarterly basis. In addition, only information 
reported for the third month of each fund's fiscal quarter on Form 
N-PORT will be publicly available (60 days after the end of the 
fiscal quarter). See N-PORT Modification Release, supra footnote 41.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We are not, however, proposing any changes to rule 139. That rule 
provides a safe harbor for a broker-dealer's publication or 
distribution of research reports where the broker-dealer is 
participating in the registered offering of the issuer's securities 
and, unlike rule 138, permits the research report to cover any class of 
the issuer's securities.
    The Commission recently adopted new Securities Act rule 139b to 
implement the Fair Access to Investment Research Act of 2017 (the 
``FAIR Act'').\142\ The FAIR Act directed that the Commission extend 
rule 139 to cover broker-dealers' publication or distribution of 
``covered investment fund research reports.'' These include research 
reports about affected funds.\143\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \142\ See Fair Access to Investment Research Act of 2017, Public 
Law 115-66, 131 Stat. 1196 (2017).We implemented the FAIR Act's 
directives to amend rule 139 by adopting new rule 139b. See also 
CIFRR Adopting Release, supra footnote 98.
    \143\ 17 CFR 230.139b. See also CIFRR Adopting Release, supra 
footnote 98, at 64183 (providing that under rule 139b, the term 
``covered investment fund'' includes, among other things, registered 
investment companies and BDCs).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 139b includes specific conditions mandated by Congress for 
covered investment fund research reports.\144\ For example, rule 139b 
excludes from the rule's safe harbor research reports published or 
distributed by the covered investment fund itself, any affiliate of the 
covered investment fund, or any broker-dealer that is an investment 
adviser (or an affiliated person of an investment adviser) for the 
covered investment fund.\145\ We believe that rule 139b satisfies the 
directives of the BDC Act and Registered CEF Act by extending rule 
139's safe harbor to research reports on BDCs and registered CEFs and 
is consistent with Congress's core objective regarding research reports 
covering these funds. Moreover, if we were to amend rule 139 to cover 
research reports on BDCs, or on affected funds generally, exactly the 
same conduct would be subject to different standards based on the rule 
a broker-dealer chose to use. We believe it is more appropriate to 
provide a consistent approach for affected fund research reports under 
rule 139b.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \144\ See section 2(f)(2)(A) of the FAIR Act, supra footnote 
142.
    \145\ See Covered Investment Fund Research Reports, supra 
footnote 98. See also section 2(f)(3) of the FAIR Act, supra 
footnote 142.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We request comment on the proposed amendments to the research 
report rules:
     Would the proposed amendments to rule 138 effectively 
implement the BDC Act and the Registered CEF Act? Have we effectively 
implemented the BDC Act and Registered CEF Act with respect to the 
research report rules?
     Do commenters agree that amendments to rule 139 are not 
necessary or appropriate in light of rule 139b? Why or why not? If not, 
how should we appropriately address affected funds in light of the 
specific directives in the FAIR Act regarding covered investment fund 
research reports? If we were to amend rule 139 to include either or 
both of BDCs and registered CEFs, should we remove them from the scope 
of ``covered investment funds'' as defined in rule 139b to avoid 
exactly the same activity being subject to different standards based on 
the rule that a broker-dealer chose to use?

F. Other Proposed Rule Amendments

1. Rule 418 Supplemental Information
    Rule 418 provides that the Commission or its staff may request 
supplemental information concerning the registrant, the registration 
statement, the distribution of the securities, market activities, and 
underwriters' activities. The rule provides a non-exhaustive list of 
the types of items that registrants should be prepared to furnish to 
the Commission or staff promptly upon request.\146\ The BDC Act 
requires us to amend rule 418 to provide that a BDC that would 
otherwise meet the eligibility requirements of Form S-3 is exempt from 
rule 418(a)(3).\147\ Paragraph (a)(3) of rule 418 generally requires 
registrants to be prepared to furnish recent engineering, management, 
or similar reports or memoranda relating to broad aspects of the 
business, operations, or products of the registrant. To implement the 
BDC Act, and to provide parity for affected registered CEFs consistent 
with the Registered CEF Act, we are proposing to amend rule 418(a)(3) 
to provide that, in addition to registrants that are eligible to use 
Form S-3, registrants that are eligible to file a short-form 
registration statement on Form N-2 are excepted from the requirement to 
furnish this information under rule 418.\148\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \146\ Under rule 418, registrants furnish supplemental 
information. They are not required to file the information with 
their registration statement, and the supplemental information does 
not become part of the registration statement. See 17 CFR 
230.418(b). Supplemental information that is ``furnished'' rather 
than ``filed'' does not subject a registrant to certain liabilities 
under the federal securities laws. See, e.g., section 11 of the 
Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 77k] (establishing liability for material 
untrue statements or omissions in registration statements); see also 
infra footnote 263.
    \147\ Section 803(b)(2)(M) of the BDC Act.
    \148\ Under section 31(b)(1) of the Investment Company Act, all 
records that a registered investment company and certain majority-
owned subsidiaries are required to maintain and preserve under 
section 31(a) shall be subject at any time and from time to time to 
such reasonable periodic, special, and other examinations by the 
Commission, or any member or representative thereof, as the 
Commission may prescribe. For purposes of these examinations, any 
subject person must make available to the Commission or its 
representatives any copies or extracts from such records as may be 
prepared without undue effort, expense, or delay as the Commission 
or its representatives may reasonably request. See 15 U.S.C. 80a-
30(b). Section 64 of the Investment Company Act generally provides 
that section 31 shall apply to a BDC to the same extent as if it 
were a registered CEF. See 15 U.S.C. 80a-63. See also rule 31a-1 
under the Investment Company Act [17 CFR 270.31a-1] (Commission 
books and records rules); rule 31a-2 [17 CFR 270.31a-2] (same).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Amendments to Incorporation by Reference Into Proxy Statements
    Schedule 14A under the Exchange Act specifies the information that 
a registrant must include in a proxy statement. Item 13 of Schedule 14A 
generally requires a registrant to furnish financial statements and 
other information for proxy statements containing specific 
proposals.\149\ However, a registrant that meets the

[[Page 14465]]

requirements of Form S-3--as defined in Note E to the Schedule--
generally may incorporate this information by reference to previously-
filed documents without delivering those documents to security holders 
with the proxy statement. The BDC Act directs us to amend Item 13(b)(1) 
of Schedule 14A to include as an issuer to which Item 13(b)(1) applies 
a BDC that would otherwise meet the requirements of Note E of the 
Schedule.\150\ The Registered CEF Act requires us to provide certain 
registered CEFs with the same flexibility under the proxy rules, 
subject to conditions that we determine are appropriate, as is 
available to other issuers that are required to file reports under 
section 13 or section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.\151\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \149\ Item 13 applies to proxy statements seeking security 
holder approval to authorize, issue, modify, or exchange securities 
as described in Items 11 or 12 of Schedule 14A.
    \150\ Section 803(b)(2)(N) of the BDC Act.
    \151\ Section 509(a) of the Registered CEF Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We are proposing to amend Item 13(b)(1) and Note E to Schedule 14A 
so that affected funds that meet the requirements of the proposed 
short-form registration instruction would have the same treatment under 
this item as registrants that meet the requirements of Form S-3. 
Specifically, we are proposing to extend this item to registrants that 
meet the requirements of the proposed short-form registration 
instruction and to describe in Note E when a registrant will be deemed 
to meet the requirements of this new instruction for these purposes. 
The proposed description in Note E would track the existing description 
of when a registrant meets the requirements of Form S-3 by, for 
example, applying the same general transaction limitations to affected 
funds that currently apply to registrants that meet the requirements of 
Form S-3.\152\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \152\ Note E states that a registrant meets the requirements of 
Form S-3 for purposes of Item 13 of Schedule 14A if, among other 
things, it meets certain of the transaction requirements identified 
in General Instruction I.B or I.C of Form S-3, subject to certain 
limitations with respect to transactions described in General 
Instruction I.B.2 of Form S-3. For instance, a registrant relying on 
the transaction requirements in General Instruction I.B.2 of Form S-
3 (e.g., a registrant that has issued at least $1 billion in non-
convertible securities, other than common equity, in registered 
primary offerings for cash over the prior 3 years) would only 
qualify for incorporation by reference under Item 13 of Schedule 14A 
if the registrant is seeking shareholder approval to authorize, 
issue, modify, or exchange non-convertible debt or preferred 
securities meeting the requirements of General Instruction I.B.2. 
Further, certain transaction requirements in General Instruction I.B 
of Form S-3, including those in General Instruction I.B.3, I.B.4, 
and I.B.6, are not covered by Note E. Based on affected funds' 
current practices, we understand that affected funds rarely make the 
types of proposals covered by Item 13 of Schedule 14A (i.e., to 
issue, modify, or exchange its securities) and may be less likely 
than operating companies to rely on the transaction requirements of 
General Instruction I.B or I.C of Form S-3 that are subject to 
limitations in Note E. However, to provide parity, we propose to 
apply to affected funds the same standards that apply to operating 
companies in our proposed amendments to Note E of Schedule 14A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We request comment on our proposed amendments to rule 418 and 
Schedule 14A:
     Do our proposed amendments to Schedule 14A provide 
affected funds with comparable treatment to operating companies? If 
not, why not? Are other modifications to our proxy rules needed to 
treat affected funds in the same manner as other issuers that are 
required to file reports under section 13 or section 15(d) of the 
Exchange Act?
     Should our proposed amendments to rule 418 extend to 
registered CEFs, as we have proposed?

G. New Registration Fee Payment Method for Interval Funds

    We are proposing a modernized approach to registration fee payment 
that would require interval funds to pay securities registration fees 
using the same method that mutual funds and ETFs use today. In general, 
issuers today--including interval funds--are required under the 
Securities Act to pay a registration fee to the Commission at the time 
of filing a registration statement.\153\ This means that they pay 
registration fees at the time they register the securities, regardless 
of when (or if) they sell them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \153\ Section 6(b)(1) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 
77f(b)(1)].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Today, WKSIs using automatic shelf registration statements have 
additional flexibility to pay filing fees at or prior to the time of a 
securities offering.\154\ As a result, these filers may defer payment 
until a future takedown of shares off a shelf registration statement. 
Affected funds that become WKSIs as a result of our proposed amendments 
would also gain that flexibility, but other affected funds would 
not.\155\ WKSIs are not the only types of issuers that currently can 
pay registration fees after they file their registration statements. 
The Investment Company Act provides that many registered investment 
companies, such as mutual funds and ETFs, register an indefinite amount 
of securities upon their registration statements' effectiveness.\156\ 
These funds pay registration fees based on their net issuance of 
shares, no later than 90 days after the fund's fiscal year end.\157\ 
These issuers must file information about the computation of this 
registration fee and other information on Form 24F-2 under the 
Investment Company Act when paying the fee.\158\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \154\ See supra footnote 62; see also Securities Offering Reform 
Adopting Release, supra footnote 5, at 44780. This arrangement is 
commonly known as ``pay as you go.'' Id.
    \155\ See supra Part II.C.
    \156\ See section 24(f)(1) of the Investment Company Act [15 
U.S.C. 80a-24(f)(1)].
    \157\ See section 24(f)(2) of the Investment Company Act [15 
U.S.C. 80a-24(f)(2)]. Specifically, these funds pay fees on a net 
basis, based upon the sales price for securities sold during the 
fiscal year and reduced based on the price of shares redeemed or 
repurchased that year.
    \158\ 17 CFR 274.24.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Interval funds, like other affected funds, are not currently 
permitted to pay registration fees on this same annual ``net'' basis, 
and must pay the registration fee at the time of filing the 
registration statement. However, we believe that interval funds would 
benefit from the ability to pay their registration fees in the same 
manner as mutual funds and ETFs, and that this approach is appropriate 
in light of interval funds' operations. In particular, interval funds--
like mutual funds and unlike other affected funds--routinely repurchase 
shares at net asset value and are required to periodically offer to 
repurchase their shares.\159\ When the Commission adopted rule 23c-3, 
which permits the operation of interval funds, it noted that the rule 
was intended to allow them to operate in certain ways that were 
traditionally available only to open-end funds.\160\ We believe that 
paying their registration fees in the same manner as open-end funds 
would yield similar operational benefits that open-end funds enjoy 
today (e.g., by computing registration fees due on an annual net 
basis). Additionally, this approach would avoid the possibility that an 
interval fund would inadvertently sell more shares than it had 
registered and would not require the interval fund to periodically 
register new shares. Accordingly, we propose to amend rules 23c-3 and 
24f-2 so that interval funds would pay registration fees on this same 
annual net basis.\161\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \159\ An interval fund must have a fundamental policy regarding 
its repurchase offers that can be changed only by a shareholder 
vote. See 17 CFR 270.23c-3(b)(2)(i).
    \160\ Registration Offers by Closed-End Management Investment 
Companies, Investment Company Act Release No. 19399 (Apr. 7, 1993) 
[58 FR 19330, 19330 (Apr. 14, 1993)].
    \161\ Specifically, the amendments to rule 23c-3 would provide 
that an interval fund would be deemed to have registered an 
indefinite amount of securities under section 24(f) upon the 
effective date of its registration statement. Proposed rule 23c-
3(e). We also propose to make a conforming amendment to rule 24f-2 
so that interval funds would pay their registration fees on the same 
annual net basis as mutual funds and other open-end funds do. 
Proposed rule 24f-2(a). We preliminarily believe that these actions 
are necessary or appropriate in the public interest and consistent 
with the protection of investors. See section 28 of the Securities 
Act [15 U.S.C. 77z-3]; section 6(c) of the Investment Company Act 
[15 U.S.C. 80a-6(c)]. As discussed in detail below, we are also 
proposing to modernize the computation and payment of registration 
fees subject to section 24(f) by requiring that submissions on Form 
24F-2 be made in a structured data format. See infra Part II.H.1.d.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 14466]]

    We request comment on these proposed amendments:
     Should we amend our rules to deem an interval fund to have 
registered an indefinite amount of securities upon effectiveness of its 
registration statement, as proposed? Should we require interval funds 
to pay registration fees on an annual net basis by filing on Form 24F-
2? Why or why not?
     Should these changes be tailored to interval funds in any 
way? Why or why not? If so, how?
     Should we tailor Form 24F-2 to interval funds in any way? 
Why or why not? If so, how?
     Instead of requiring interval funds to pay registration 
fees on an annual net basis as proposed, should we permit interval 
funds that are not WKSIs to make registration fee payments on a pay-as-
you-go basis, as WKSIs are permitted to do today? Why or why not?
     Should we permit additional categories of issuers to pay 
registration statement fees on an annual net basis as under rule 24f-2 
(or on a pay-as-you-go basis)? For example, should tender offer funds 
be permitted to pay registration fees in this manner? Are funds that 
have historically made periodic tender offers voluntarily--but for 
which these offers are not a fundamental policy--sufficiently similar 
to interval funds or open-end funds such that their paying registration 
fees under rule 24f-2 would be appropriate? If we were to permit tender 
offer funds to use this payment method, how would we define an eligible 
tender offer fund?
     Should interval funds be permitted to choose whether to 
pay registration fees on either an annual net basis (or on a pay-as-
you-go basis) or in the current manner, at the time of registration? 
Alternatively, should all interval funds be required to pay 
registration fees on an annual net basis, as we propose and as open-end 
funds are required to do today?

H. Disclosure and Reporting Parity Proposals

    We are proposing amendments to our rules and forms intended to 
tailor the disclosure and regulatory framework for affected funds in 
light of our proposed amendments to the offering rules applicable to 
them. Many of these proposed amendments are not expressly required by 
the BDC Act or the Registered CEF Act but we believe would further the 
respective Acts' goals of providing regulatory parity to affected funds 
with otherwise similarly-situated issuers.\162\ Some of the proposed 
amendments also reflect that, as the Registered CEF Act requires, we 
have considered the availability of information to investors in 
connection with the proposed amendments.\163\ As discussed in detail 
below, these proposed amendments include structured data requirements; 
new annual and current reporting requirements; amendments to provide 
all affected funds additional flexibility to incorporate information by 
reference; and proposed enhancements to the disclosures that registered 
CEFs make to investors when the funds are not updating their 
registration statements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \162\ For example, regulatory parity could mitigate any 
competitive disparities between affected funds and other issuers. It 
also could help investors in affected funds by providing them 
investor protections that are currently provided to investors in 
similarly-situated issuers. See, e.g., infra discussion in 
paragraphs accompanying footnotes 209-215.
    \163\ Section 509(a) of the Registered CEF Act (providing, in 
part, that any action that the Commission takes pursuant to this 
subsection shall consider the availability of information to 
investors, including what disclosures constitute adequate 
information to be designated as a ``well-known seasoned issuer'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Structured Data Requirements
    We are proposing certain new structured data reporting requirements 
for registered CEFs and BDCs. In particular, and as discussed in detail 
below, we are proposing to require BDCs, like operating companies, to 
submit financial statement information using Inline XBRL format; to 
require that registered CEFs and BDCs include structured cover page 
information in their registration statements on Form N-2 using Inline 
XBRL format; to require that certain information required in an 
affected fund's prospectus be tagged using Inline XBRL format; and to 
require that filings on Form 24F-2 be submitted in Extensible Markup 
Language (``XML'') format.
a. Inline XBRL Requirements for Financial Statements and Notes to 
Financial Statements
    In 2009, the Commission adopted rules requiring operating companies 
to submit the information from the financial statements accompanying 
their registration statements and periodic and current reports in a 
structured, machine-readable format using XBRL format.\164\ These 
requirements were intended to make financial information easier for 
investors to analyze and to assist in automating regulatory filings and 
business information processing.\165\ Last year, the Commission adopted 
modifications to these requirements by requiring issuers to use Inline 
XBRL format to reduce the time and effort associated with preparing 
XBRL filings, simplify the review process for filers, and improve the 
quality and usability of XBRL data for investors.\166\ The Commission 
has also adopted structured data reporting requirements for most 
registered investment companies, including, for example, prospectus 
risk/return summary information for mutual funds and ETFs,\167\ which 
are also required to submit this information using Inline XBRL 
format.\168\ The Commission also adopted requirements for most 
registered investment companies to file monthly reporting of portfolio 
securities on a quarterly basis,\169\ as well as annual reporting of 
certain ``census'' information,\170\ in a structured data format.\171\ 
Most recently the Commission proposed to require the use of Inline XBRL 
for the submission of certain statutory prospectus disclosures for 
variable annuity and variable life insurance contracts.\172\ BDCs, 
however, are currently subject to neither the structured data reporting 
requirements for operating companies

[[Page 14467]]

nor those for registered investment companies.\173\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \164\ Interactive Data to Improve Financial Reporting, 
Securities Act Release No. 9002 (Jan. 30, 2009) [74 FR 6776 (Feb. 
10, 2009)] (``2009 Financial Statement Information Adopting 
Release'') (requiring submission of an Interactive Data File to the 
Commission in exhibits to such reports); see also Securities Act 
Release No. 9002A (Apr. 1, 2009) [74 FR 15666 (Apr. 7, 2009)].
    \165\ 2009 Financial Statement Information Adopting Release, 
supra footnote 164, at 6776.
    \166\ Inline XBRL Filing of Tagged Data, Securities Act Release 
No. 10514 (June 28, 2018) [83 FR 40846, 40847 (Aug. 16, 2018)] 
(``Inline XBRL Adopting Release''). Inline XBRL allows filers to 
embed XBRL data directly into an HTML document, eliminating the need 
to tag a copy of the information in a separate XBRL exhibit. Inline 
XBRL is both human-readable and machine-readable for purposes of 
validation, aggregation, and analysis. Id. at 40851.
    \167\ Interactive Data for Mutual Fund Risk/Return Summary, 
Investment Company Act Release No. 28617 (Feb. 11, 2009) [74 FR 7748 
(Feb. 19, 2009)].
    \168\ See Inline XBRL Adopting Release, supra footnote 166.
    \169\ Reporting Modernization Release, supra footnote 41 
(requiring portfolio information on Form N-PORT); N-PORT 
Modification Release, supra footnote 41 (modifying the filing 
requirements for Form N-PORT); Money Market Fund Reform, Investment 
Company Act Release No. 29132 (Feb. 23, 2010) [75 FR 10060 (Mar. 4, 
2010)] (requiring portfolio information on Form N-MFP).
    \170\ Reporting Modernization Release, supra footnote 41, at 
81870 (requiring ``census'' information on Form N-CEN).
    \171\ We require reports on these forms to be filed in an XML 
format that is not Inline XBRL.
    \172\ Updated Disclosure Requirements and Summary Prospectus for 
Variable Annuity and Variable Life Insurance Contracts, Investment 
Company Act Release No. 33286 (Oct. 30, 2018) [83 FR 61730 (Nov. 30, 
2018)] (``Variable Contract Summary Prospectus Proposing Release'').
    \173\ Rule 30b-1 under the Investment Company Act [17 CFR 
270.30b-1] (requiring certain registered investment companies, but 
not BDCs, to file reports on Form N-PORT); rule 30a-1 under the 
Investment Company Act [17 CFR 270.30a-1] (requiring certain 
registered investment companies, but not BDCs, to file reports on 
Form N-CEN); see also Reporting Modernization Release, supra 
footnote 41, at 81876 (noting that BDCs are not subject to reporting 
on Form N-PORT); 2009 Financial Statement Information Adopting 
Release, supra footnote 164, at 6788 (noting that BDCs are not 
subject to the XBRL financial statement information requirements).
    Prior to the adoption of the XBRL requirements in the 2009 
Financial Statement Information Adopting Release, which did not 
apply to BDCs, the one commenter to address their exclusion from the 
scope of the proposal had opined that the investment management 
taxonomy was not yet sufficiently developed. See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We believe that reporting in a structured data format makes 
financial information easier for investors to analyze and helps 
automate regulatory filings and business information processing. We 
further believe that, like investors in operating companies and 
investors in registered investment companies, BDC investors would--
either directly or indirectly through third-party analysis--benefit 
from the availability of relevant information in a structured data 
format.\174\ Accordingly, we propose to amend Item 601 of Regulation S-
K to remove the exclusion for BDCs from the Inline XBRL financial 
statement tagging requirements.\175\ This would subject BDCs to the 
Inline XBRL financial statement tagging requirements that apply to 
operating companies, reducing the current disparity between the 
accessibility of information BDCs provide to the market and the 
accessibility of information that operating companies provide to the 
market. Based on our staff's review of BDCs' disclosures and assessment 
of the XBRL taxonomies' development since they were first adopted in 
2009, we believe that relevant XBRL taxonomies are sufficiently well 
developed for financial statement reporting by BDCs. We therefore 
believe that applying these taxonomies to BDCs would impose smaller 
reporting costs and would yield more useful data for investors, 
Commission staff, and other data users than would requiring BDCs to 
provide structured financial information by filing reports on Forms N-
PORT or N-CEN using a different technology.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \174\ Having this information in a structured data format would 
also enhance our staff's ability to review and analyze BDCs' 
financial statements.
    \175\ Compare proposed Item 601(b)(101)(i) of Regulation S-K [17 
CFR 229.601(b)(101)(i)] (excludes registered investment companies 
from financial statement tagging requirements) with current Item 
601(b)(101)(i) of Regulation S-K [17 CFR 229.601(b)((101)(i)] 
(excludes all registrants that prepare financial statements in 
accordance with Article 6 of Regulation S-X [17 CFR 210.6-01 through 
210.6-10]).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We request comment on the proposed requirement for BDCs to tag 
financial statement information using Inline XBRL format:
     Should we require BDCs to tag financial statement 
information in a structured data format? Why or why not? Is Inline XBRL 
the appropriate format for BDC financial statement information? Why or 
why not? If another structured data format would be more appropriate, 
which one, and why?
     Is it appropriate for BDCs to be subject to the same 
Inline XBRL financial statement information requirements as operating 
companies, or would it be more appropriate to require them to provide 
structured data by filing reports on Form N-PORT or Form N-CEN? Why or 
why not? Would the information that BDCs include in financial 
statements and that would be tagged in Inline XBRL format under the 
proposal be more important to BDC investors than the structured data 
required by Forms N-PORT and N-CEN? Why or why not?
     Should structured financial statement data reporting 
requirements be tailored to BDCs? If so, how and why?
     Should any subset of BDCs (for example, BDCs that would 
not be eligible to file a short-form registration statement) be exempt 
from the proposed structured financial statement data reporting 
requirement? If so, what subset and why?
     Do commenters agree that the relevant XBRL taxonomies are 
sufficiently well developed for financial statement reporting by BDCs? 
Why or why not? What, if any, additions should be made to one or more 
of the XBRL taxonomies to enhance their suitability for BDC financial 
statements?
b. New Check Boxes and Structured Data Format for Form N-2 Cover Page 
Information
    We are proposing to require all affected funds to tag the data 
points that appear on the cover page of proposed Form N-2 using Inline 
XBRL format.\176\ We currently require registrants to tag all of the 
data points on the cover page of Form 10-K, Form 10-Q, Form 8-K, Form 
20-F, and Form 40-F using Inline XBRL format.\177\ We believe extending 
this requirement to mandatory tagging of the data points on the cover 
page of Form N-2 would allow investors, other market participants, and 
other data users to automate their use of this information. This would 
enhance their ability to better identify, count, sort, aggregate, 
compare, and analyze registrants and disclosures to the extent these 
data points otherwise would be formatted only in HyperText Markup 
Language (``HTML''). The cover page data points that we propose 
affected funds to tag would include, for example, the company name, the 
Act or Acts to which the registration statement relates, and checkboxes 
relating to the effectiveness of the registration statement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \176\ See proposed General Instruction H.2.a of Form N-2; 
proposed rule 405(b)(3) of Regulation S-T. We propose that all of 
the data points that appear on the cover page of proposed Form N-2, 
with the exception of the table including information about 
calculation of the registration fee under the Securities Act, be 
tagged in Inline XBRL format.
    \177\ FAST Act Modernization and Simplification of Regulation S-
K, Securities Act Release No. 10425 (Oct. 11, 2017) [82 FR 50988, 
51023 (Nov. 2, 2017)]; FAST Act Modernization and Simplification of 
Regulation S-K, Securities Act Release No. 10618 (Mar. 20, 2019) 
(``FAST Act Modernization Adopting Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, we propose to amend Form N-2 to require a checkbox 
indicating that the registration statement or post-effective amendment 
filed by a WKSI will become effective upon filing with the Commission 
under rule 462(e) under the Securities Act.\178\ The securities 
offering reforms of 2005 included a parallel requirement for operating 
companies' registration statements on Form S-3.\179\ A related checkbox 
would indicate that the registration statement is an automatic shelf 
registration statement filed by a WKSI to post-effectively register 
additional securities or classes of securities under rule 413(b) under 
the Securities Act.\180\ We also propose to require a checkbox 
indicating a fund's reliance on the proposed short-form registration 
instruction--electing a status that is similar to the use of Form S-3 
(rather than Form S-1) in the operating company context. Investors, 
Commission staff, and other data users can distinguish between 
registration statements for operating companies based on whether they 
are filed on Form S-1 or Form S-3. Because affected funds all file 
their registration

[[Page 14468]]

statements on Form N-2, a checkbox is necessary to distinguish the type 
of registration statement being filed. We are also proposing to require 
checkboxes that would identify characteristics of the fund, including 
whether it is (1) a registered CEF; (2) a BDC; (3) a registered CEF 
that operates as an interval fund; (4) qualified to file a short-form 
registration statement on Form N-2; (5) a WKSI; (6) an emerging growth 
company; \181\ or (7) a registrant that has been registered or 
regulated under the Investment Company Act for less than 12 calendar 
months.\182\ The checkbox presentation of these characteristics on the 
cover page will allow investors, Commission staff, and others to more 
readily identify types of issuers and securities. These checkboxes 
would be among the data points required to be tagged using Inline XBRL 
format.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \178\ See proposed cover page of Form N-2.
    \179\ See Securities Offering Reform Adopting Release, supra 
footnote 2, at 44789.
    \180\ Rule 413(b) under the Securities Act, which allows a WKSI 
to file a post-effective amendment to add additional securities or 
additional classes of securities to an automatic shelf registration 
statement already in effect, is limited to: (1) Securities of a 
class different than those registered on the effective automatic 
shelf registration statement identified as provided in rule 430B(a); 
or (2) securities of a majority-owned subsidiary that are permitted 
to be included in an automatic shelf registration statement, 
provided that the subsidiary and the securities are identified as 
provided in rule 430B and the subsidiary satisfies the signature 
requirements of an issuer in the post-effective amendment.
    \181\ See rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act [17 CFR 240.12b-2] 
(defining ``emerging growth company'').
    \182\ We are also proposing to add several other checkboxes to 
Form N-2 to clarify the purpose of the filing, including a checkbox 
to indicate that the only securities being registered are being 
offered pursuant to dividend or interest reinvestment plans, as well 
as new checkboxes to indicate whether the Form is being filed as a 
post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) or Rule 
462(d) under the Securities Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form N-2 registrants are required to include a table on the form's 
cover page that includes information about calculation of the fund's 
registration fee under the Securities Act. We believe that the 
information in this table would not--unlike the other cover page 
elements, including the proposed checkboxes--permit data users to 
distinguish among Form N-2 registrants in a manner that is similar to 
the way that that operating company registrants currently may be 
distinguished by their filing form type. Therefore, we are not 
proposing that affected funds be required to tag this cover page fee 
table.
    We request comment on the proposed Form N-2 cover page information 
tagging requirement:
     Should we require, as proposed, all information on the 
cover page of Form N-2, except the table that includes information 
about the calculation of the fund's registration fee, to be tagged 
using Inline XBRL format? Are there any other cover page data points 
that we should not require be tagged in Inline XBRL format? For 
example, are there any data points where tagging in Inline XBRL format 
would be duplicative with similar requirements, or where Inline XBRL 
tagging would serve limited benefit in helping to identify, count, 
sort, aggregate, compare, and analyze registrants? Should this 
requirement be tailored in any way--for example, to particular types of 
registrants that file on Form N-2 (such as those that are eligible to 
file a short-form registration statement, and/or WKSIs)--and if so, how 
and why? Should the proposed requirement apply to only to those data 
points related to affected funds' use of the rules amended by this 
proposal? Would the costs associated with tagging all of the cover page 
data points be significantly greater than the costs of tagging only the 
checkboxes related to use of the proposed short-form registration 
instruction or the use of an automatic shelf registration? If so, why?
     Is proposed General Instruction H.2 of Form N-2, in 
conjunction with rule 405 of Regulation S-T as we propose to amend it, 
sufficiently clear for registrants and other market participants to 
understand the proposed requirement to tag Form N-2 cover page 
information in Inline XBRL format? If not, how could we make the 
requirement clearer?
     Instead of requiring cover page data points to be tagged 
using Inline XBRL format, should we require this data to be submitted 
using another format, such as XML? Why or why not? If so, which 
alternative format would be appropriate, and why? Would the 
administrative costs vary between formats? If so, which format would be 
more costly, and why? Would the benefits to users of the information 
vary between formats? If so, which format would be more beneficial, and 
why? Should more than one format be permitted? Should the specific 
format be left unspecified? Would investors and others realize the 
benefits of reporting in a structured data format if the specific 
structured data format were unspecified? Why or why not?
     Are there any changes we should make to the proposed 
amendments to better ensure accurate and consistent tagging? If so, 
which changes should we make and why?
c. Tagging of Prospectus Disclosure Items
    We propose to require all affected funds to tag certain information 
that is required to be included in an affected fund's prospectus using 
Inline XBRL format.\183\ Like mutual funds and ETFs, all affected funds 
would be required to submit to the Commission using Inline XBRL certain 
information discussed below in registration statements or post-
effective amendments filed on Form N-2 \184\ and forms of prospectuses 
filed pursuant to rule 424 under the Securities Act that include 
information that varies from the registration statement.\185\ A 
seasoned fund filing a short-form registration statement on Form N-2 
also would be required to tag information appearing in Exchange Act 
reports--such as those on Forms N-CSR, 10-K, or 8-K--if that 
information is required to be tagged in the fund's prospectus.\186\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \183\ See proposed General Instruction H.2 of Form N-2; proposed 
amendments to rule 405 of Regulation S-T.
    \184\ See proposed General Instruction H.2.a of Form N-2.
    \185\ See proposed General Instruction H.2.b of Form N-2.
    \186\ See proposed General Instruction H.2.c of Form N-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We are proposing that affected funds tag the following prospectus 
disclosure items using Inline XBRL format: Fee Table; Senior Securities 
Table; Investment Objectives and Policies; Risk Factors; Share Price 
Data; and Capital Stock, Long-Term Debt, and Other Securities.\187\ We 
believe that these items--which provide important information about a 
fund's key features, costs, and risks--would be best suited to being 
tagged in a structured format and be of greatest utility for investors 
and other data users that seek structured data to analyze and compare 
funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \187\ See proposed General Instructions H.2.b and H.2.c of Form 
N-2; see also Items 3.1, 4.3, 8.2.b, 8.2.d, 8.3.a, 8.3.b, 8.5.b, 
8.5.c, 8.5.e, 10.1.a-d, 10.2.a-c, 10.2.e, 10.3, and 10.5 of Form N-
2. This information largely parallels similar information contained 
in the Form N-1A risk/return summary. See Item 2 (Risk/Return 
Summary: Investment Objectives/Goals), Item 3 (Risk/Return Summary: 
Fee Table), and Item 4 (Risk/Return Summary: Investments, Risks and 
Performance) of Form N-1A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We would require affected funds to tag the Fee Table, which 
provides detailed information about the fund's costs. We believe that 
tagging could facilitate analysis of fund costs, and allow investors 
and other data users to compare the costs of a particular affected fund 
with the costs of other funds or other investment products, such as 
mutual funds. We are also proposing to require affected funds to tag 
the Senior Securities Table, which requires registrants to include 
information about each of its classes of senior securities, including 
bank loans. This will facilitate analyses of outstanding senior 
securities that may bear on the likelihood, frequency, and size of 
distributions from the fund to its investors. We propose to require 
tagging of Investment Objectives and Policies, which provides 
information about the fund's principal portfolio emphasis. We are also 
proposing to require tagging of Risk Factors to facilitate the 
aggregation, analysis, and comparison by investors and other data users 
of information about a fund's risks alongside the fund's features and 
benefits. We propose to require the tagging of Share Price

[[Page 14469]]

Information, as the presence of a premium or discount may bear on the 
likelihood, frequency, and size of distributions from the fund to its 
investors, which we believe may be of particular importance to many 
affected fund investors.\188\ We would also require affected funds to 
tag Capital Stock, Long-Term Debt, and Other Securities to better 
inform common shareholders how their rights, expenses, and risks are 
affected when the fund issues other types or classes of securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \188\ See infra footnote 207 and accompanying text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Similar to mutual funds and ETFs under the recently adopted Inline 
XBRL regime,\189\ we would require affected funds to submit 
``Interactive Data Files'' (i.e., machine-readable computer code that 
presents information in XBRL format) as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \189\ See Inline XBRL Adopting Release, supra footnote 166.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     For any registration statements and post-effective 
amendments, Interactive Data Files must be filed either concurrently 
with the filing or in a subsequent amendment that is filed on or before 
the date that the registration statement or post-effective amendment 
that contains the related information becomes effective; \190\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \190\ Proposed General Instruction H.2.a of Form N-2; cf. 
General Instruction C.3.(g)(i)(B) of Form N-1A.
    In the corresponding instruction in Form N-1A, the timing of the 
submission of the Interactive Data File varies based on whether the 
fund is filing a registration statement or post-effective amendment 
pursuant to rule 485(a) under the Securities Act, or a post-
effective amendment pursuant to rule 485(b) under the Act. If the 
fund is filing pursuant to rule 485(a), it must submit the 
Interactive Data File as an amendment to the registration statement 
to which it relates, on or before the date that the registration 
statement or post-effective amendment that contains the related 
information becomes effective. See General Instruction C.3.(g)(i)(A) 
of Form N-1A. If the fund is filing pursuant to rule 485(b) (where 
the post-effective amendment may become effective immediately upon 
filing), the fund may submit the Interactive Data File either 
together with the post-effective amendment filing, or in the same 
manner as it would with a rule 485(a) filing. See General 
Instruction C.3.(g)(i)(B) of Form N-1A. Because rule 485 is not 
applicable to affected funds, and because practices may differ as to 
automatic effectiveness of affected funds' registration statements 
and post-effective amendments, the proposed Form N-2 instruction 
(like General Instruction C.3.(g)(i)(B) of Form N-1A) permits an 
affected fund to submit an Interactive Data file either concurrently 
with the registration statement or post-effective amendment filing, 
or as a subsequent amendment that is filed on or before the date 
that the registration statement or post-effective amendment that 
contains the related information becomes effective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     for any prospectus filed pursuant to rule 424, Interactive 
Data Files must be submitted concurrently with the filing; \191\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \191\ Proposed General Instruction H.2.b to Form N-2; cf. 
General Instruction C.3.(g)(ii) of Form N-1A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     for any Exchange Act report that a seasoned fund filing a 
short-form registration statement on Form N-2 would have to tag, as 
discussed above, Interactive Data files must be submitted concurrently 
with the filing.\192\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \192\ Proposed General Instruction H.2.c to Form N-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We believe this approach will facilitate the timely availability 
and promote the comparability and utility of important information in a 
structured data format for investors, other market participants, and 
other data users, yielding substantial benefits. For data aggregators 
responding to demand for the data, the availability of the required 
disclosures in the Inline XBRL format concurrent with filing or before 
the date of effectiveness would allow them to quickly process and share 
the data and related analysis with investors. Therefore, consistent 
with the approach in the recently adopted Inline XBRL rules for mutual 
funds and ETFs, we are not proposing to provide affected funds a filing 
period to submit Interactive Data Files. Affected funds could request 
temporary and continuing hardship exemptions for the inability to 
timely file electronically the Interactive Data File.\193\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \193\ See rule 201 of Regulation S-T (temporary hardship 
exemption) and rule 202 of Regulation S-T (continuing hardship 
exemption).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We request comment generally on the proposed amendments to require 
the use of Inline XBRL format for certain Form N-2 disclosure items, 
and specifically on the following issues:
     Should we make the submission of structured data in the 
Inline XBRL format mandatory for affected funds, as proposed? Should 
the requirements for affected funds generally mirror the recently-
adopted Inline XBRL requirements for mutual funds and ETFs, as 
proposed? Should we take a different or more tailored approach for 
affected funds, and if so, what should that be?
     Should we also require a seasoned fund filing a short-form 
registration statement on Form N-2 to tag information appearing in 
Exchange Act reports, such as those on Forms N-CSR, 10-Q, 10-K, or 8-K, 
if that information is required to be tagged in the fund's prospectus? 
Why or why not?
     Is proposed General Instruction H.2 of Form N-2, in 
conjunction with rule 405 of Regulation S-T as we propose to amend it, 
sufficiently clear for registrants and other market participants to 
understand the proposed requirement to tag certain Form N-2 disclosure 
items in Inline XBRL format? Is this proposed requirement equally clear 
in its requirements to tag initial registration statements, post-
effective amendments, forms of prospectuses, and (for seasoned funds 
that file a short-form registration statement on Form N-2) certain 
information that appears in Exchange Act reports? If not, how could we 
make the requirements more clear?
     Would affected funds encounter any technical or other 
difficulties associated with the proposed requirement to tag certain 
information that appears in forms of prospectus or Exchange Act 
reports, and if so, how could we resolve such difficulties? For 
example, should we amend any of the Commission forms that affected 
funds use to file Exchange Act reports to facilitate the proposed 
tagging requirement? If so, how?
     As proposed, should affected funds be required to use 
Inline XBRL format to tag each of the following sections of the 
prospectus: Fee Table; Senior Securities Table; Investment Objectives 
and Policies; Risk Factors; Share Price Data; and Capital Stock, Long-
Term Debt, and Other Securities? Should other or different information 
that affected funds disclose on Form N-2 be required to be tagged using 
Inline XBRL? For example, should we require tagging of information 
about asset coverage ratios?
     Should any category of affected fund (for example, 
affected funds that would not be eligible to file a short-form 
registration statement) be exempt from the proposed Inline XBRL 
requirements? If so, which ones, and why?
     To what extent do investors and other market participants 
find information that is available in a structured format useful for 
analytical purposes? Is information that is narrative, rather than 
numerical, useful as an analytical tool?
     Should the failure by an affected fund to submit a 
required Interactive Data File affect the registrant's ability to file 
post-effective amendments to its registration statement, as is the case 
currently for mutual funds and ETFs? Why or why not? Should it 
similarly affect an affected fund's ability to update its registration 
statement with information incorporated by reference from an Exchange 
Act report?
     We are proposing to require BDCs to submit the information 
from their financial statements using Inline XBRL format.\194\ We also 
are proposing that all affected funds--BDCs and registered CEFs--tag 
certain prospectus disclosure items using Inline XBRL. Should we also 
require registered CEFs to submit

[[Page 14470]]

the information from their financial statements to the Commission using 
Inline XBRL format? If so, should we require registered CEFs to tag all 
of this information, or just information that is not required by Forms 
N-PORT or N-CEN, such as certain information from a fund's Statement of 
Operations or Financial Highlights? \195\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \194\ See supra Part H.1.a.
    \195\ A fund's Statement of Operations and Financial Highlights 
describes the amount and character of the income received (e.g., 
dividends, interest income, payment in kind (``PIK'')), which helps 
investors understand whether a fund is likely to pay or cut a 
dividend, and the amount and character of the distributions paid 
(e.g., distributions from income, realized gains, return of 
capital), which helps investors understand whether they are 
receiving actual profits from the fund, or just receiving a portion 
of their original investment. Similarly, a registered CEF must 
identify affiliated investments and income from affiliates in its 
Schedule of Investments, Statement of Assets & Liabilities, and 
Statement of Operations. Investors that are focused on the potential 
conflicts of interest that are inherent in affiliated transactions 
may look more carefully at a fund that invests a significant amount 
in an affiliate that only pays PIK. This could suggest that the fund 
is investing in the entity because it is an affiliate, and not 
because it is a good investment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

d. Structured Data Format for Form 24F-2
    Today, filings on Form 24F-2 are submitted via EDGAR in HTML or, 
less commonly, American Standard Code for Information Interchange 
(``ASCII'') format.\196\ Such submissions are human-readable but are 
not susceptible to automated validation or aggregation. We believe use 
of a structured data format would make it easier for issuers to 
accurately prepare and submit the information required by Form 24F-2 
and would make the submitted information more useful to Commission 
staff. Automated validation processes could help issuers compute 
registration fees accurately before submitting the filing. A structured 
filing format could also facilitate pre-population of previously-filed 
information. Therefore, we propose to amend the EDGAR Filer Manual to 
require submission of filings on Form 24F-2 in a structured XML 
format.\197\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \196\ See General Instruction A.3 to Form 24F-2; rule 
101(a)(1)(iv). We are also proposing to make a technical correction 
in Form 24F-2 to refer to the applicable paragraph of rule 101 of 
Regulation S-T. See proposed General Instruction A.3 to Form 24F-2 
(correcting ``rule 101(a)(1)(i)'' to ``rule 101(a)(1)(iv)'').
    \197\ As discussed in detail above, we are also proposing to 
expand the group of issuers subject to filing on Form 24F-2 to 
include certain affected funds. See supra Part II.G.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We request comment on our proposal to require filings on Form 24F-2 
to be submitted in a structured XML format:
     Should we require, as proposed, that filings on Form 24F-2 
be submitted in a structured format? Why or why not? Should the 
required format, as proposed, be XML? Why or why not? If another format 
would be more appropriate, which format and why?
     Should the requirement to submit filings on Form 24F-2 in 
a structured data format apply to certain 24F-2 filers and not to 
others? If so, which ones and why?
     Should the Commission make available a web-based fillable 
form for preparing submissions on Form 24F-2? Why or why not? Would 
such a tool be useful for filers? Would additional pre-filing 
validation processes designed to reduce fee computation errors be 
useful for filers?
2. Periodic Reporting Requirements
    We are also proposing new annual report requirements. We expect 
several of the reforms we are proposing in this release, such as those 
relating to automatically effective shelf registration, forward 
incorporation by reference, and final prospectus delivery, would 
elevate the importance of periodic reporting relative to prospectus 
disclosure for affected funds. A seasoned fund filing a short-form 
registration statement on Form N-2 would forward incorporate all 
periodic Exchange Act reports into its registration statement.\198\ 
This could result in periodic reports becoming a more salient, 
convenient, and comprehensive source of updated information about a 
particular seasoned fund, relative to that fund's registration 
statement. These funds' annual reports may take on greater prominence, 
with investors looking to the annual reports for key information.\199\ 
Registered CEFs' shareholder reports may also take on greater 
prominence for investors because, under the proposal, affected funds 
would not be required to deliver final prospectuses but would still be 
required to deliver shareholder reports at least semi-annually.\200\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \198\ See proposed General Instruction F.3.b of Form N-2.
    \199\ In 2005, the Commission observed that recent enhancements 
to Exchange Act reporting enabled us to rely on those reports to a 
greater degree in adopting our rules to reform the securities 
offering process. Securities Offering Reform Adopting Release, supra 
footnote 5, at 44726. As the Commission did then, we believe that 
enhanced periodic reporting is an important corollary to reform of 
the offering process under the Securities Act. See id.
    \200\ Compare proposed 17 CFR 230.172 with 17 CFR 270.30e-1; see 
also supra Part II.C.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, we are proposing to require seasoned funds that 
register using the proposed short-form registration instruction to 
include key information in their annual reports regarding fees and 
expenses, premiums and discounts, and outstanding senior securities 
that the funds currently disclose in their prospectuses.\201\ Because 
the annual report will be incorporated by reference into the fund's 
prospectus, requiring disclosure in both the prospectus and annual 
report should not require duplicative disclosure. Moreover, specifying 
identical disclosure requirements in both places may facilitate forward 
incorporation by reference, by making clear that the same required 
disclosure will satisfy both requirements. We believe that investors 
should have no less current information than they do today about these 
items when the fund is offering its shares. Finally, we are proposing 
to require registered CEFs to provide management's discussion of fund 
performance (or ``MDFP'') in their annual reports to shareholders, BDCs 
to provide financial highlights in their registration statements and 
annual reports, and affected funds filing a short-form registration 
statement on Form N-2 to disclose material unresolved staff comments. 
These proposals are intended to modernize and harmonize our periodic 
report disclosure requirements for affected funds with those applicable 
to operating companies and mutual funds and ETFs.\202\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \201\ In general, these proposed requirements are expressed as a 
cross-reference to the existing registration statement requirements 
in Form N-2. See proposed Instructions 4.h(1)-4.h(4) to Item 24 of 
Form N-2. We considered proposing that these requirements apply to 
both annual and semi-annual reports to shareholders in the case of 
registered CEFs. We determined to propose to require this disclosure 
only in annual reports (and not also semi-annual reports) because 
annual reports currently provide more comprehensive information than 
semi-annual reports, and we therefore believe annual reports' 
information would be better complemented by the proposed additional 
disclosures.
    \202\ See infra Parts II.H.1.a-II.H.2.d. We also propose to 
amend Form N-2 to clarify that certain of its requirements for 
annual reports also apply to BDCs. See proposed Instruction 10 to 
Item 24 of Form N-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

a. Fee and Expense Table, Share Price Data, and Senior Securities Table
    We are proposing to require funds filing a short-form registration 
statement on Form N-2 to include key information in their annual 
reports that they currently disclose in their prospectuses in light of 
the importance of this information and the increased prominence of 
shareholder reports under our proposal. Specifically, we propose that 
these funds include the following information in their annual reports: 
\203\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \203\ See proposed Instruction 4.h(2) to Item 24 of Form N-2 
(fee and expense table); Proposed Instruction 4.h(3) to Item 24 of 
Form N-2 (share price data); Proposed Instruction 4.h(1) to Item 24 
of Form N-2 (senior securities table).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 14471]]

     Fee and Expense Table: Form N-2 currently requires 
registrants to include information about the costs and expenses that 
the investor will bear directly or indirectly, using specified captions 
and a specified tabular format.\204\ This table is designed to help 
investors understand the costs of investing in an affected fund and to 
compare those costs with the costs of other affected funds.\205\ The 
Commission has previously noted the importance of costs to an 
investment decision and, in the case of registered open-end funds, has 
specified the location of the fee table to enhance the prominence of 
the cost information.\206\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \204\ Item 3.1 of Form N-2.
    \205\ See Enhanced Disclosure and New Prospectus Delivery Option 
for Registered Open-End Management Investment Companies, Investment 
Company Release No. 28064 (Nov. 21, 2007) [72 FR 67790, 67794 (Nov. 
30, 2007)].
    \206\ See id.; Enhanced Disclosure and New Prospectus Delivery 
Option for Registered Open-End Management Investment Companies, 
Investment Company Act Release No. 28584 (Jan. 13, 2009) [74 FR 
4546, 4553 (Jan. 26, 2009)]; Request for Comment on Fund Retail 
Investor Experience and Disclosure, Investment Company Act Release 
No. 33113 (June 5, 2018) [83 FR 26891, 26901 (June 11, 2018)] 
(``Investor Experience Request for Comment'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Share Price Data: Form N-2 currently requires registrants 
to include information about the share price of the registrant's stock 
as well as information about any premium or discount that the share 
price reflects, compared to the registrant's net asset value.\207\ The 
presence of a premium or discount may bear on the likelihood, 
frequency, and size of distributions from the fund to its investors, 
which we believe may be of particular importance to many affected fund 
investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \207\ Item 8.5 of Form N-2; see also proposed Instruction 4.h(3) 
to Item 24 of Form N-2 (share price data).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Senior Securities Table: Form N-2 currently requires 
registrants to include information about each of its classes of senior 
securities, including bank loans.\208\ As with a premium or discount, 
any outstanding senior securities may bear on the likelihood, 
frequency, and size of distributions from the fund to its investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \208\ Item 4.3 of Form N-2. This information must be audited. 
See Instruction 1 to Item 4.3 (applying Instruction 8 to Item 4.1 to 
Item 4.3); Instruction 8 to Item 4.1 (requiring the information to 
be audited).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We request comment on our proposal that these funds include this 
information in their annual reports:
     Should we require this information to appear in these 
affected funds' annual reports? Why or why not?
     Should we also require these affected funds to provide 
this information in their semi-annual and other periodic reports?
     Should the required information be the same as the 
information currently required in the registration statement? Should it 
be tailored to the annual report? If so, how and why? For example, 
should information on fees and expenses be backward-looking rather than 
forward-looking?
     We are proposing to require funds filing a short-form 
registration statement on Form N-2 to include the key information 
discussed above in their annual reports. Is the scope of affected funds 
we have proposed to be subject to this requirement appropriate? Should 
the scope be expanded or reduced? Why or why not? For example, should 
all affected funds be subject to the fee and expense information 
requirements, rather than only those that file a short-form 
registration on the form?
     Should we permit some or all of the required information 
to be provided on a fund's website in lieu of including it in the 
fund's annual report? Would a website disclosure requirement make more 
frequently and timely disclosure practicable? For example, should we 
permit a fund not to include the required premium and discount 
information in its annual report if it provides the information on its 
website on a daily basis? Would such information be more accessible to 
investors and other data users than information included in an annual 
report transmitted to shareholders, or less accessible?
b. Management's Discussion of Fund Performance
    Currently, mutual funds and ETFs are required to include MDFP in 
their annual reports to shareholders.\209\ That requirement was 
intended to address our concern that existing disclosure requirements 
did not provide investors with sufficient information to easily 
evaluate investment results achieved by mutual funds, or to relate 
those results to the mutual fund's investment objective.\210\ MDFP 
disclosure aids investors in assessing a fund's performance over the 
prior year and complements other backward looking information required 
in the annual report, such as financial statements.\211\ This required 
disclosure is grounded conceptually in the disclosure requirement for 
operating companies (as well as BDCs) to include a narrative discussion 
of the financial statements of the company--``management discussion and 
analysis'' or ``MD&A''--and to provide an opportunity to look at a 
company through the eyes of management.\212\ MDFP requires, among other 
things, narrative disclosure about factors that materially affected the 
fund's performance during the most recently completed fiscal year, as 
well as the impact on a fund and its shareholders of policies and 
practices that funds may use to maintain a certain level of 
distributions.\213\ This narrative disclosure requirement is formulated 
in an intentionally general way, reflecting our view that a flexible 
approach would elicit more meaningful disclosure tailored to each 
fund.\214\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \209\ Item 27(b)(7) of Form N-1A. This requirement applies to 
registered open-end management investment companies other than money 
market funds.
    \210\ Disclosure and Analysis of Mutual Fund Performance 
Information; Portfolio Manager Disclosure, Investment Company Act 
Release No. 17294 (Jan. 8, 1990) [55 FR 1460, 1462 (Jan. 16, 1990)] 
(``MDFP Proposing Release'').
    \211\ Shareholder Reports and Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure of 
Registered Management Investment Companies, Investment Company Act 
Release No. 26372 (Feb. 27, 2004) [69 FR 11243, 11254 (Mar. 9, 
2004)] (``Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure Adopting Release''). When 
this disclosure requirement was first adopted, the information could 
be included in either the prospectus or the annual report, but in 
2004 the Commission determined to require that it be included in the 
annual report to aid investors in assessing a fund's performance 
over the prior year and to complement other backward looking 
information required in the annual report, such as financial 
statements. Id.
    \212\ MDFP Proposing Release, supra footnote 210, at 1462 
(explaining that the MD&A disclosure requirement includes a 
discussion of an operating company's liquidity, capital resources, 
results of operations, and other information necessary to an 
understanding of the company's financial condition, changes in 
financial condition, and results of operations; further explaining 
that it requires the management of an operating company to identify 
and address those key variables and other qualitative and 
quantitative factors which are peculiar to and necessary for an 
understanding and evaluation of the company).
    \213\ Id. at 1461; Item 27(b)(7) of Form N-1A.
    \214\ MDFP Proposing Release, supra footnote 210, at 1462. The 
narrative discussion must relate back, in part, specifically to the 
fund's investment strategies and the techniques used by the fund's 
investment adviser. See Item 27(b)(7)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Although the Commission has required mutual funds and ETFs to 
include MDFP disclosure and BDCs, like operating companies, to include 
MD&A disclosure for some time, Form N-2 does not currently include an 
MD&A or MDFP requirement for registered CEFs. We believe that investors 
in these funds--like investors in mutual funds, ETFs, BDCs, and 
operating companies--would benefit from annual report disclosure that 
aids them in assessing the fund's performance over the prior year and 
that complements other information in the report.\215\ Moreover, we 
believe that

[[Page 14472]]

MDFP disclosure requirements are more appropriately tailored to the 
financial reporting of registered investment companies than MD&A 
requirements. Therefore, we propose to amend Form N-2 to extend the 
MDFP disclosure requirements to all registered CEFs. Specifically, we 
propose to require, similar to Form N-1A, that registered CEFs:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \215\ See Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure Adopting Release, supra 
footnote 211, at 11254; Comment Letter of Investment Company 
Institute (Oct. 24, 2018) on File No. S7-12-18 (recommending that 
the Commission consider requiring registered CEFs to provide an MDFP 
in shareholder reports); Comment Letter of A. Wellington (Sept. 3, 
2018) on File No. S7-12-18 (noting that registered CEF shareholder 
reports do not include MDFP and expressing concerns about registered 
CEF disclosures).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Discuss the factors that materially affected their 
performance during the most recently completed fiscal year, including 
the relevant market conditions and the investment strategies and 
techniques used by the fund;\216\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \216\ Proposed Instruction 4.g(1) to Item 24 of Form N-2. As 
proposed, we would expressly permit the information presented to 
include tables, charts, and other graphical depictions. Id. We 
encourage such depictions to the extent they may be illuminating.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Provide a line graph comparing the initial and subsequent 
account values at the end of each of the most recently completed ten 
fiscal years of the fund and a table of the fund's total returns for 
the 1-, 5-, and 10-year periods as of the last day of the fund's most 
recent fiscal year; \217\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \217\ Proposed Instruction 4.g.(2) to Item 24 of Form N-2. The 
proposed requirement for Form N-2 differs from the requirement in 
Form N-1A in that open-end fund values must be computed on the basis 
of the fund's net asset value per share, while registered CEF values 
would be required to be computed on the basis of market price per 
share or on the basis of net asset value if their shares are not 
listed. Compare Instruction 1(b) to Item 27(b)(7)(iv) of Form N-1A 
with proposed Instruction 4.g.(2)(A)1 to Item 24 of Form N-2. 
Because certain registered CEFs have received exemptive relief to 
offer more than one share class, we are including an instruction 
regarding class selection for purposes of the line graph 
computation. See proposed Instruction 4.g.(2)(A)2 to Item 24 of Form 
N-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Discuss the effect of any policy or practice of 
maintaining a specified level of distributions to shareholders on the 
fund's investment strategies and per share net asset value during the 
last fiscal year, as well as the extent to which the registrant's 
distribution policy resulted in distributions of capital.\218\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \218\ Proposed Instruction 4.g(3) to Item 24 of Form N-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We request comment on the proposed requirement for registered CEFs 
to include a discussion of fund performance in their annual reports:
     Should we require MDFP information to appear in a 
registered CEF's annual report? Why or why not? If so, should we 
further tailor the current MDFP requirements applicable to mutual funds 
and ETFs for registered CEFs, beyond ways in which the proposal is 
already tailored for registered CEFs?
     Instead of requiring MDFP information for registered CEFs, 
should we require such funds to disclose MD&A information like BDCs and 
operating companies? If so, should an MD&A requirement be tailored for 
registered CEFs? If so, how and why? Should the disclosure requirement 
vary between funds that are internally managed and those that are 
externally managed? For example, would an MD&A requirement be more 
appropriate for internally managed funds and an MDFP requirement be 
more appropriate for externally managed funds? Why or why not?
     Alternatively, should we bring over any of the MD&A 
requirements into the proposed MDFP requirement for registered CEFs, in 
order to further the disclosure goals of MDFP? Would it be appropriate 
to require or permit forward-looking disclosure, as is included in MD&A 
disclosure (and if so, are there any related additional rules or rule 
amendments we should adopt to facilitate this disclosure)? For example, 
many investors invest in registered CEFs based on an expectation of 
receiving shareholder distributions. In addition to the proposed 
requirement that registered CEFs include in MDFP a discussion of 
distributions to shareholders during the last fiscal year, would 
investors benefit from a forward-looking discussion of anticipated 
distributions? If we were to require certain MD&A requirements for 
registered CEFs, should these requirements apply only to a certain 
subset of registered CEFs, for example, those that most closely 
resemble BDCs in terms of investment strategy? If so, what changes to 
the proposed MDFP disclosure requirements should we make to achieve 
this result? As another alternative, should we require registered CEFs 
to provide either MD&A or MDFP disclosure, based on their view of the 
presentation that would be most informative to investors?
     Are there other ways in which we should modify the 
proposed MDFP disclosure requirement for registered CEFs to better 
elicit meaningful disclosure that would further the goals that the 
Commission discussed when it originally adopted the MDFP requirement 
for open-end funds? \219\ For example, in reviewing MDFP disclosure 
provided by mutual funds and ETFs, our staff has observed instances in 
which funds' MDFP disclosure was not well tailored to the relevant fund 
and generally discussed economic trends without a meaningful discussion 
of how those trends (or other factors) materially affected the fund's 
performance during the period. Are there changes we can make to the 
proposed MDFP disclosure requirements for registered CEFs to make more 
clear that MDFP disclosure should discuss the factors that materially 
affected the fund's performance during the period as opposed to more 
general discussions of economic trends and fund performance? For 
example, should we incorporate requirements to: (1) Disclose the impact 
of particular investments (including large positions and/or significant 
investments) or investment types that contributed to or detracted from 
performance; (2) explain a fund's performance in relation to its index; 
(3) explain how the use of leverage affected fund performance; (4) 
explain the reason for and effect of any large cash or temporary 
defensive positions on fund performance; (5) explain the effect of any 
tax strategies, or the effects of taxes, on fund performance; (6) 
explain the effect of non-recurring or non-cash income on fund 
performance; (7) include general discussion of purchases and sales of 
fund shares and the effects of any share repurchases or tender offers 
on fund performance; and/or (8) disclose whether the fund engages in 
high portfolio turnover and the effect of portfolio turnover on fund 
performance? Are there changes we should make to the proposed average 
annual total return table to provide additional or more useful 
information to investors, for example, to require total return based on 
per-share net asset value, in addition to (as is proposed) total return 
based on current market price?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \219\ See supra footnote 210 and accompanying text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     As another alternative, should any of the proposed MDFP 
requirements for registered CEFs also be required for BDCs to include 
in their MD&A? For example, should we include the line graph currently 
required in MDFP in the MD&A requirements applicable to BDCs?
     Should registered CEFs be required to include the line 
graph that mutual funds and ETFs are required to include in their MDFP 
disclosure, as we have proposed? If so, should that requirement be 
differently or further tailored for registered CEFs in any way? If so, 
how and why?
     The line graph that mutual funds and ETFs are required to 
include in their MDFP disclosure, and which we would propose to require 
of registered CEFs, compares the fund's performance to an ``appropriate 
broad-based

[[Page 14473]]

securities market index.'' \220\ In adopting this requirement, the 
Commission described such an index as ``one that provides investors 
with a performance indicator of the overall applicable stock or bond 
markets, as applicable,'' while also stating that a fund would have 
``considerable flexibility in selecting a broad-based index that it 
believes best reflects the market(s) in which it invests.'' \221\ Our 
staff has observed varying practices with respect to the benchmarks 
funds use. Some funds, for example, disclose their performance against 
a benchmark index that may not provide a performance indicator of ``the 
overall applicable stock or bond markets,'' and in some cases, is not a 
``securities market index.'' \222\ Others disclose as their benchmark 
index a combination of two or more broad-based securities market 
indexes.\223\ We recently requested comment on benchmark indexes in our 
Investor Experience Request for Comment, with some investors expressing 
concerns about the effectiveness of the benchmarks certain funds use in 
presenting their performance.\224\ As we continue to consider 
improvements to the investor experience with fund disclosure,\225\ we 
seek further comment on how benchmark indexes are used in connection 
with performance presentations. If an index does not reflect the 
performance of the overall applicable stock or bond markets, does it 
provide an effective comparison for investors to understand the 
performance of their fund relative to the market? If not, should we 
provide additional limitations on an appropriate benchmark to 
facilitate a more effective comparison? If so, what kinds of 
limitations and why?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \220\ Proposed Instruction 4(g)(2)(F) of Form N-2; cf. 
Instruction 5 of Item 27(b)(7) of Form N-1A.
    \221\ Disclosures of Mutual Fund Performance and Managers, 
Investment Company Act Release No. 19832 (Apr. 6, 1993) [58 FR 
19050, 19053 (Apr. 12, 1993)].
    \222\ Our staff has observed that some funds, particularly those 
that invest in several different asset classes, may select an 
interest-rate index (e.g., LIBOR), not a securities market index, 
against which to compare their performance.
    \223\ Other funds disclose a ``blended index'' that combines the 
components of two or more broad-based securities market indices 
(e.g., 50% S&P 500, 50% Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index). Funds 
with niche or highly-customized investment strategies may disclose a 
customized or bespoke index that is used only by the fund in 
question (or perhaps a small number of funds).
    \224\ See Investor Experience Request for Comment, infra 
footnote 206 (comments available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-12-18/s71218.htm); Comment of Logan Fowler (Aug. 13, 2018) 
(``Compare to a market measure I understand, and the asset class the 
fund holds.''); Comment of Hector Ewing (Aug. 30, 2018) (``Compare 
against a market measure I know, like the S&P 500, not some obscure 
thing I never heard of.''); and Comment of Frank W. (``Compare all 
equity funds to S&P 500 or compare all bond funds to Total Bond 
Index. Compare funds to similar funds (in same category).'').
    \225\ As described in the Commission's Fall 2018 Regulatory 
Flexibility Act agenda, the Division of Investment Management is 
considering recommending that the Commission propose rule and form 
amendments to improve and modernize the current disclosure framework 
of funds under the Investment Company Act to improve the investor 
experience. The Commission's Fall 2018 Regulatory Flexibility Act 
agenda is available at www.reginfo.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

c. Financial Highlights
    Currently, registered CEFs are required to include financial 
highlights in their registration statement,\226\ as well as in each 
annual report to shareholders.\227\ This information is arranged to 
allow investors to trace the operating performance of a fund on a per 
share basis from the fund's beginning net asset value to its ending net 
asset value so that investors may understand the sources of 
changes.\228\ It summarizes the financial statements.\229\ BDCs include 
their full financial statements in their prospectus, and we currently 
permit BDCs to omit financial highlights disclosure summarizing these 
financial statements.\230\ We understand, however, that it is generally 
market practice for BDCs to include financial highlights, and we 
believe that investors would benefit from disclosure summarizing a 
BDC's financial statements. In light of the importance of financial 
highlights information and to provide consistent requirements for all 
affected funds, we are proposing to require that BDCs, like other 
affected funds, disclose this information in their registration 
statements and annual reports.\231\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \226\ Item 4.1 of Form N-2; but see General Instruction 1 to 
Item 4.1 of Form N-2 (limiting the applicability of Item 4.1 in the 
case of BDCs).
    \227\ Instruction 4.b to Item 24 of Form N-2.
    \228\ Registration Form for Closed-End Management Investment 
Companies, Investment Company Act Release No. 19115 (Nov. 20, 1992) 
[57 FR 56826, 56829 (Dec. 1, 1992)].
    \229\ Registration Form for Closed-End Management Investment 
Companies, Investment Company Act Release No. 17091 (July 28, 1989) 
[54 FR 32993, 32997 (Aug. 11, 1989)].
    \230\ General Instruction 1 to Item 4.
    \231\ Proposed Deletion of Instruction 1 to Item 4 of Form N-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, we propose to make one conforming change to the 
financial highlights requirements in Form N-2 to eliminate the 
requirement that registered CEFs specify the average commission rate 
paid.\232\ Although this information is currently required for 
registered CEFs,\233\ the Commission previously eliminated a similar 
requirement for open-end funds registered on Form N-1A.\234\ The 
Commission reached this determination after receiving and considering 
public comment arguing that these rates are technical information that 
typical investors are unable to understand.\235\ We believe that the 
same considerations meriting elimination of this information from Form 
N-1A also apply to registered CEFs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \232\ See proposed Item 4.1 of Form N-2.
    \233\ Item 4.1.1 of Form N-2; Instructions 18-19 to Item 4.1 of 
Form N-2.
    \234\ Item 13(a) of Form N-1A; Registration Form Used by Open-
End Management Investment Companies, Investment Company Act Release 
No. 23064 (Mar. 13, 1998) [63 FR 13916, 13936 (Mar. 23, 1998)].
    \235\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We request comment on the proposed requirement for BDCs to disclose 
financial highlights and the elimination of the requirement that 
registered CEFs specify the average commission rate paid:
     Should we require BDCs to disclose financial highlight 
information? Why or why not?
     BDCs currently disclose information under Item 301 of 
Regulation S-K that has some similarities to the financial highlights 
requirement. Would requiring disclosure of both sets of information 
result in duplicative disclosure obligations? Why or why not? Should we 
permit the Item 301 information and the financial highlights 
information to be presented in a combined manner, or should we require 
each set of information to be disclosed separately? Why?
     Should the required financial highlight information be 
tailored for BDCs in any way? If so, how and why?
     Should we eliminate the average commission rate paid 
requirement from Form N-2? Why or why not? Should registered CEFs be 
distinguished from open-end funds in this respect?

[[Page 14474]]

d. Unresolved Staff Comments
    As part of the Commission's 2005 securities offering reforms for 
operating companies, the Commission required certain issuers affected 
by that rulemaking to disclose outstanding staff comments that remain 
unresolved for a substantial period of time and that the issuer 
believes are material.\236\ The Commission stated at the time that 
enhanced Exchange Act reporting provided a principal basis for those 
rules. Specifically, the Commission emphasized that it is important for 
issuers to timely resolve any staff comments on their Exchange Act 
reports, but recognized that the new rules could eliminate some 
incentives issuers may have to do so.\237\ Specifically, the Commission 
required operating companies that are accelerated filers or WKSIs to 
disclose, in their annual reports on Form 10-K or Form 20-F, written 
comments staff made in connection with a review of Exchange Act reports 
that the issuer believes are material, that were issued more than 180 
days before the end of the fiscal year covered by the annual report, 
and that remain unresolved as of the date of the filing of the Form 10-
K or Form 20-F report.\238\ This rulemaking, like the 2005 securities 
offering reforms, may eliminate some incentives for certain affected 
funds to timely resolve staff comments. Currently, for staff to declare 
any annual update to the fund's registration statement effective, 
affected funds generally must resolve all staff comments.\239\ Under 
the proposed amendments, in contrast, affected funds filing a short-
form registration statement on Form N-2 would generally no longer need 
to file annual post-effective amendments subject to staff review.\240\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \236\ Securities Offering Reform Adopting Release, supra 
footnote 5, at 44787.
    \237\ Id.
    \238\ Id.
    \239\ See supra footnote 25 and accompanying text.
    \240\ These funds would, however, generally be required to file 
a new registration statement every three years. See supra footnote 
19.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We therefore propose to amend the annual report requirement in Form 
N-2 to apply a similar requirement to affected funds filing a short-
form registration on the form.\241\ In addition to written comments on 
current and periodic reports, we also propose to require these funds to 
disclose unresolved written comments on their registration statement 
that they believe are material.\242\ Affected funds filing a short-form 
registration statement on Form N-2 will have flexibility in providing 
required prospectus disclosure directly in the prospectus or in 
Exchange Act reports incorporated by reference. Our proposal would 
therefore require these funds to disclose material unresolved staff 
comments on key required disclosures regardless of whether a fund 
includes them in a shareholder report or directly in the fund's 
registration statement. These disclosure requirements would provide an 
incentive for affected funds to timely resolve staff comments, and 
investors may value information about areas of disagreement that the 
issuer believes are material.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \241\ Proposed Instruction 4.h(4) to Item 24 of Form N-2.
    \242\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We request comment on the proposed requirement to disclose 
unresolved staff comments:
     Should we require disclosure of unresolved staff comments? 
Why or why not? Are there more appropriate means to provide incentives 
to timely resolve staff comments? Should we require disclosure of 
unresolved staff comments in semi-annual reports as well?
     Is the scope of registrants subject to the unresolved 
staff comments disclosure requirement appropriate? Should the 
requirement apply to additional registrants? If so, which ones, and 
why? For example, should the requirement apply to all affected funds, 
or a different subset of affected funds than proposed? Should the 
requirement apply, for example, to registered CEFs that file post-
effective amendments to registration statements under paragraph (b) of 
Securities Act rule 486? Similarly, should the requirement apply to 
mutual funds and ETFs that file post-effective amendments under 
paragraph (b) of Securities Act rule 485? Alternatively, should the 
requirement apply to fewer affected funds? If so, which ones, and why?
     Should the staff have a role in determining which 
unresolved comments should be disclosed? Should we require disclosure 
of all unresolved comments without regard to a materiality assessment 
by the issuer?
     Should we specifically require issuers to list each 
outstanding comment in its disclosure by repeating the comment verbatim 
as issued by the staff instead of, as proposed, requiring issuers to 
disclose the substance of any unresolved comment? Should we permit 
issuers to paraphrase or summarize the outstanding staff comments?
     Is 180 days the right timeframe to resolve outstanding 
staff comments? Is it too long or too short? Should the 180 days be 
calculated from the date of the initial written comment letter from the 
staff, regardless of comments received after that date that relate to 
or arise from the original comments or issuer responses to the original 
comments?
3. New Current Reporting Requirements for Affected Funds
    Form 8-K under the Exchange Act generally requires reporting 
companies subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the 
Exchange Act, including BDCs, to publicly disclose certain specified 
events and information on a current basis to provide investors and the 
market with timely information about these events. In order to improve 
information for investors and to provide parity among registered CEFs, 
BDCs, and operating companies, we are proposing to require registered 
CEFs to report information on Form 8-K.\243\ We also propose to amend 
Form 8-K to: (1) Add two new reporting items for affected funds on 
material changes to investment objectives or policies and material 
write-downs of significant investments, and (2) tailor the existing 
reporting requirements and instructions to affected funds.\244\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \243\ Consistent with the scope of operating companies that 
currently are required to file reports on Form 8-K, only registered 
CEFs that are Exchange Act reporting companies under section 13(a) 
or section 15(d) of the Exchange Act would be subject to Form 8-K 
requirements under our proposal. See 17 CFR 240.13a-1; 17 CFR 
240.13a-11; 17 CFR 240.15d-1; 17 CFR 240.15d-11.
    \244\ In connection with this proposal, we are proposing to 
amend Form 8-K as well as rule 13a-11 and rule 15d-11 under the 
Exchange Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

a. Proposal To Require Form 8-K Reporting by Registered CEFs
    Form 8-K identifies certain events that are of such importance to 
investors that prompt disclosure is necessary. Companies may also use 
Form 8-K to voluntarily disclose any other information that they 
determine may be material or otherwise important to investors.\245\ 
Under the current regulatory framework, BDCs are required to furnish or 
file reports on Form 8-K to provide current information about important 
events. These events include, among others, new material definitive 
agreements, quarterly earnings announcements and releases, new direct 
financial obligations, changes in directors, sales of unregistered 
equity securities, and submissions of matters to a vote of security 
holders.\246\ Registered CEFs

[[Page 14475]]

generally are not required by our rules to report information on Form 
8-K,\247\ although some do so voluntarily or under exchange rules.\248\ 
Exchange rules generally require certain disclosure to be made on Form 
8-K or through another Regulation FD compliant method that is 
reasonably designed to provide broad non-exclusionary distribution of 
the information to the public.\249\ Approximately 73% of registered 
CEFs are listed on an exchange and already subject to exchange rules 
requiring prompt public disclosure of certain information.\250\ 
Registered CEFs may also furnish information on Form 8-K to satisfy 
public disclosure requirements under Regulation FD.\251\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \245\ See, e.g., Additional Form 8-K Disclosure Requirements and 
Acceleration of Filing Date, Securities Act Release No. 8106 (June 
17, 2002) [67 FR 42914, 42915 (June 25, 2002)]; Additional Form 8-K 
Disclosure Requirements and Acceleration of Filing Date, Securities 
Act Release No. 8400 (Mar. 16, 2004) [69 FR 15594, 15595 (Mar. 25, 
2004)] (``2004 8-K Adopting Release'').
    \246\ See Items 1.01 (Entry into a Material Definitive 
Agreement), 2.02 (Results of Operations and Financial Condition), 
2.03 (Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation 
under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant), 3.02 
(Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities), 5.02 (Departure of 
Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of 
Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers), 
and 5.07 (Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders). 
Based on a review by the staff, BDCs file or furnish reports under 
these items of Form 8-K more frequently than other mandatory 
reporting items in the Form. BDCs also made many reports under Item 
7.01 (Regulation FD Disclosure) and Item 8.01 (Other Events).
    \247\ See rules 13a-11(b) and 15d-11(b) under the Exchange Act 
[17 CFR 240.13a-11(b) and 17 CFR 240.15d-11(b)]. While registered 
CEFs are required to use Form 8-K to file notice of a blackout 
period under 17 CFR 245.104 (rule 104 of Regulation BTR), we have 
recognized that this requirement would only apply to investment 
companies in rare instances. See rules 13a-11(b)(1) and 15d-11(b)(1) 
under the Exchange Act; Insider Trades During Pension Fund Blackout 
Periods, Exchange Act Release No. 47225 (Jan. 22, 2003) [68 FR 4338, 
4339 (Jan. 28, 2003)]; Insider Trades During Pension Fund Blackout 
Periods, Exchange Act Release No. 46778 (Nov. 6, 2002) [67 FR 69430, 
69432 (Nov. 15, 2002)] (explaining that because investment companies 
typically do not have employees, they typically do not maintain 
employee pension plans and, as a practical matter, there generally 
would be no blackout periods that would trigger a Form 8-K reporting 
requirement).
    \248\ See, e.g., NYSE Listed Company Manual Sections 202.05 and 
202.06 (providing the following examples of the types of information 
that may need to be promptly disclosed to the public: annual and 
quarterly earnings, dividend announcements, mergers, acquisitions, 
tender offers, stock splits, major management changes, and any 
substantive items of unusual or non-recurrent nature); Nasdaq Rule 
5250(b)(1).
    \249\ See, e.g., NYSE Listed Company Manual Section 202.06(A); 
Nasdaq rule 5250(b)(1); rule 101(e) of Regulation FD [17 CFR 
243.101(e)].
    \250\ As of September 30, 2018, there were 516 listed registered 
CEFs and 188 unlisted registered CEFs. See infra Part IV.A.1.
    \251\ See rule 101(e) of Regulation FD [17 CFR 243.101(e)]; Item 
7.01 of Form 8-K. Affected funds are generally subject to Regulation 
FD. See rule 101(b) of Regulation FD [17 CFR 243.101(b)] (providing 
that an issuer subject to Regulation FD is one that has a class of 
securities registered under section 12 of the Exchange Act [15 
U.S.C. 78l] or that is required to file reports under section 15(d) 
of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. 78o(d)], including any closed-end 
investment company, as defined in section 5(a)(2) of the Investment 
Company Act [15 U.S.C. 80a-5(a)(2)]).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In adopting the 2005 securities offering reforms, the Commission 
stated that reforming the securities offering process was possible due, 
in part, to the fact that operating companies disseminated information 
to the market on an ongoing basis through Exchange Act reports, 
including current reporting on Form 8-K.\252\ In addition, operating 
companies must provide current information on Form 8-K to qualify as 
WKSIs or seasoned issuers and gain the associated benefits (e.g., 
automatic shelf registration statements, forward incorporation by 
reference).\253\ We are proposing to require registered CEFs to report 
current information on Form 8-K to improve current information 
available to registered CEF investors and in recognition of the role of 
current reporting in the 2005 securities offering reforms that we are 
proposing to extend to registered CEFs. We also believe that requiring 
this reporting would address the current lack of parity between 
registered CEFs and BDCs in terms of current reporting to investors and 
the market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \252\ See 2005 Securities Offering Reform Adopting Release, 
supra footnote 5, at 44726. See also id. at 44730 (declining to make 
the benefits of being a reporting issuer, seasoned issuer, or well-
known seasoned issuer available to voluntary filers and stating that 
``such issuers should be required to register under the Exchange 
Act, and thus become subject to all of the results of registration 
for all purposes, if they wish to avail themselves of'' these 
benefits).
    \253\ See General Instruction I.A.3 of Form S-3 (requiring, in 
relevant part, that an operating company has filed all the material 
required to be filed pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange 
Act--which would include Form 8-K--for a period of time, and has 
filed all such required reports in a timely manner for that period, 
with the exception of specified Form 8-K items); rule 405 under the 
Securities Act (requiring an issuer to meet these Form S-3 
requirements to qualify as a WKSI).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While we understand that registered CEFs presently may provide some 
current disclosure through press releases, voluntary Form 8-K filings, 
prospectus supplements, or post-effective amendments, we believe it 
would be beneficial to standardize the current information that all 
affected funds must disclose and to make this information accessible in 
a central location on EDGAR.\254\ This approach would provide all 
investors in affected funds with uniform information and reduce 
potential informational disparities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \254\ Notably, registered CEFs would still be permitted to 
publish current information in press releases or other published 
documents or statements (``press releases''). If a press release 
contains information that would meet some or all requirements of 
Form 8-K and is published before a registered CEF would be required 
to file a Form 8-K report under any relevant items, the registered 
CEF could incorporate by reference information from the press 
release into its Form 8-K report, provided the press release is 
filed as an exhibit to the report. See General Instruction F of Form 
8-K.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We recognize that certain items in Form 8-K are substantively the 
same as or similar to existing disclosure requirements for registered 
CEFs, although the existing requirements provide less timely 
disclosure. For example, registered CEFs are generally required to 
provide the information required under Item 4.01 (Changes in 
Registrant's Certifying Accountant) of Form 8-K in their semi-annual or 
annual shareholder reports.\255\ Further, registered CEFs are required 
to provide in their semi-annual or annual shareholder reports certain 
information found in Item 5.07 of Form 8-K about matters submitted to a 
vote of shareholders.\256\ Notably, Form 8-K would require disclosure 
within 4 business days of the relevant event, while the existing regime 
calls for disclosure on an annual or semi-annual basis. We believe it 
would be appropriate to require registered CEFs to provide more timely 
and current disclosure on these matters on Form 8-K. We are not 
proposing to remove or otherwise modify current disclosure requirements 
for registered CEFs that are similar to reportable events under Form 8-
K. We believe this approach should not significantly burden registered 
CEFs since, absent significant changes, they should be able to use 
their Form 8-K disclosure to more efficiently prepare the corresponding 
disclosure in their shareholder reports.\257\ Moreover, we believe that 
continuing to require the relevant disclosure in shareholder reports 
may reduce potential disruptions to shareholders who are accustomed to 
finding certain information in these reports, and who may not regularly 
monitor for reports on Form 8-K, and should limit discrepancies between 
different types of funds' shareholder reports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \255\ See Instructions 4.d and 5.d of Item 24 of Form N-2. 
Operating companies are similarly required to provide this 
information in their annual reports to security holders. See 17 CFR 
240.14a-3(b)(4); 17 CFR 240.14c-3(a)(1).
    \256\ See rule 30e-1(b) under the Investment Company Act [17 CFR 
270.30e-1(b)]. We recognize that operating companies and BDCs are 
not required to provide information about shareholder voting results 
on Form 10-Q or Form 10-K. See Proxy Disclosure Enhancements, 
Exchange Act Release No. 61175 (Dec. 16, 2009) [74 FR 68334 (Dec. 
23, 2009)].
    \257\ As discussed below, a registered CEF would not be required 
to furnish or file a report on Form 8-K if relevant disclosure was 
already provided in a shareholder report. See proposed amendments to 
General Instruction B.3 of Form 8-K, discussed infra at footnotes 
295-296 and accompanying text.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 14476]]

    We request comment on our proposal to apply Form 8-K reporting 
requirements to registered CEFs: \258\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \258\ We also request comment on the proposed compliance date 
for the proposed amendments to Form 8-K in Part II.K infra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Should all registered CEFs be required to disclose current 
information on Form 8-K? If not, why should certain or all registered 
CEFs be permitted to make use of the registration, communications, and 
offering amendments discussed in this proposal without providing 
current information to the market, unlike operating companies and BDCs? 
Should we require Form 8-K reporting only by listed registered CEFs or 
by registered CEFs that qualify as WKSIs or that are eligible to file a 
short-form registration statement? If so, why should certain types of 
registered CEFs (e.g., unlisted registered CEFs) be treated differently 
than similarly-situated BDCs or operating companies (e.g., unlisted 
BDCs)? What would be the potential impacts on investors and the market 
if we required different levels of information from different 
categories of registered CEFs? If we do not require certain types of 
registered CEFs to report on Form 8-K, should we also consider this 
approach for the same category of BDCs? What would be the potential 
impact on investors and the market of removing Form 8-K information for 
the relevant BDCs?
     Do investors and the market have a need for more current 
disclosure about important events impacting registered CEFs? Why or why 
not? Do informational needs vary between listed registered CEFs and 
unlisted registered CEFs? For example, do investors and the market need 
more current information about listed registered CEFs for purposes of 
pricing shares? Are investors and the market less likely to need 
current disclosure from registered CEFs that are engaged in a 
continuous offering and provide investors and the market information 
about important changes to their disclosure through prospectus 
supplements or post-effective amendments?
     Are there existing mechanisms that registered CEFs use to 
disclose current information about important events to investors, other 
than disclosures required by exchange rules as discussed above? For 
example, to what extent do registered CEFs provide current information 
about the types of important events covered by Form 8-K and our 
proposed amendments through filings under rule 497, in press releases, 
or on their websites? How timely and accessible are registered CEFs' 
disclosures about important events under the current framework? How 
does this framework impact the potential costs and benefits of 
requiring registered CEFs to report information on Form 8-K?
     Should we address potentially duplicative disclosure 
requirements for registered CEFs under Form 8-K and existing rule and 
form requirements? If so, how? For example, should we amend rule 30e-
1(b) under the Investment Company Act to exclude registered CEFs that 
file information under Item 5.07 of Form 8-K (Submission of Matters to 
a Vote of Security Holders) from the requirement to furnish information 
about matters submitted to a shareholder vote in the fund's annual or 
semi-annual shareholder report? Would investors be more likely to miss 
information disclosed only on Form 8-K, and not also included in an 
annual or semi-annual report to shareholders, because some investors 
may be more likely to read a shareholder report rather than monitor for 
8-K filings during the year?
     Does a listed registered CEF's compliance with exchange 
disclosure rules impact the potential costs and benefits of requiring 
listed registered CEFs to report information on Form 8-K? If so, how?
     What are the impacts, if any, of requiring registered CEFs 
to make reports on Form 8-K but not subjecting other registered 
investment companies to this requirement? \259\ Should we require that 
other registered investment companies provide current disclosure on 
Form 8-K or otherwise? Why or why not?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \259\ We have not proposed requiring registered investment 
companies that are not affected funds, such as registered open-end 
funds, to report information on Form 8-K because these funds are not 
eligible to take advantage of the other amendments to the 
registration, communications, and offering rules we are proposing. 
Further, the new Form 8-K items we are proposing are tailored to 
affected funds and may not provide useful information for other 
types of funds. For example, as described below, registered open-end 
funds typically invest in more liquid investments for which there is 
publicly-available information surrounding events that may impact 
valuations, which makes Form 8-K disclosure about these funds' 
material write-downs less important to investors. See infra Part 
II.H.3.b.ii (discussing proposed Item 10.02 of Form 8-K).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     In addition to the requests for comment above, we request 
general comment on feasible alternatives to our proposal to require 
registered CEFs to report on Form 8-K that would minimize the reporting 
burdens on funds while maintaining the anticipated benefits of the 
reporting and disclosure. We also request comment on the utility of the 
information proposed to be included in reports to the Commission, 
investors, and the public in relation to the costs to funds of 
providing the reports.
b. Proposed Form 8-K Reporting Items for Affected Funds
    We are proposing amendments to Form 8-K as it relates to affected 
funds to improve current reporting of important information by affected 
funds to investors and the market. We believe it is appropriate to 
propose certain new reporting items that would apply to all affected 
funds to better tailor Form 8-K disclosure to these types of investment 
companies. We believe these amendments enhance parity between affected 
funds and operating companies that are able to take advantage of the 
registration, communications, and offering rules in the 2005 securities 
offering reforms with respect to the amount of current information 
available to investors, consistent with the overall intent of the 
Registered CEF and BDC Acts.
    We believe many current reporting items are relevant to affected 
funds and provide information that is important to investors and the 
market. However, based on an analysis of BDC reporting on Form 8-K, 
BDCs did not file any reports under 7 of the 23 mandatory reporting 
items reflected in Item 1.01 through Item 5.08 over a 3-year review 
period, and there was a relatively low volume of reporting on several 
other items.\260\ While we recognize that Form 8-K is meant to capture 
important events, many of which may occur at a low frequency, we 
believe it would be beneficial to investors and the market to make 
certain targeted amendments to Form 8-K as it applies to affected funds 
to ensure that investors and the markets receive important current 
information from affected funds. The additional reporting items we 
propose are designed to recognize certain differences between events 
that are relevant to affected funds and those that are relevant to 
operating companies. We believe these additions should promote parity 
between affected funds and operating companies with respect to the 
market benefits of current disclosure about relevant important events. 
This approach is similar to our approach to applying tailored Form 8-K 
reporting requirements to asset-backed issuers.\261\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \260\ See also infra footnotes 415-416 and accompanying text.
    \261\ See section 6 of Form 8-K (identifying six discrete 
reportable events that apply only to asset-backed securities); 
Asset-Backed Securities, Exchange Act Release No. 50905 (Dec. 22, 
2004) [70 FR 1506, 1508, 1577-80 (Jan. 7, 2005)] (establishing 
separate Form 8-K reportable events for asset-backed securities in 
recognition that many of the Commission's then-existing disclosure 
and reporting requirements did not elicit relevant information for 
most asset-backed securities transactions). Similar to asset-backed 
issuers, affected funds differ from corporate issuers because, for 
example, they typically do not have employees and they are generally 
formed to provide investors with exposure to a pool of assets. 
Unlike our approach to asset-backed issuers, we are not proposing a 
General Instruction to Form 8-K to exclude affected funds from 
certain reporting requirements. While we believe that certain items 
will never or very rarely create reporting obligations for affected 
funds, excluding affected funds from certain reporting requirements 
may unduly complicate Form 8-K and may not provide tangible benefits 
since affected funds are unlikely to be subject to such reporting 
requirements regardless of whether we provide specific exclusions.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 14477]]

    Specifically, we are proposing to add new Section 10 to Form 8-K to 
list two additional reportable events for affected funds. Under new 
Section 10, an affected fund would be required to file a report on Form 
8-K if the fund has: (1) A material change to its investment objectives 
or policies; or (2) a material write-down in fair value of a 
significant investment. The first item represents an event that does 
not occur in operating companies and, thus, it has not previously been 
considered for purposes of current reporting requirements on Form 8-K. 
The second item is similar to the Form 8-K requirement that operating 
companies report material impairments, but with necessary modifications 
to tailor the disclosure requirements to affected funds and their use 
of fair value accounting under generally accepted accounting principles 
(``GAAP''). We believe these two events are important to investors and 
that affected funds should be required to provide timely disclosure 
when they occur. We believe that the proposed reportable events occur 
infrequently and should not result in numerous, persistent reports on 
Form 8-K by affected funds.
    We request comment immediately below on this general approach and, 
separately, discuss each new proposed Form 8-K item.
     Should we add new reporting items to Form 8-K for affected 
funds? Why or why not? Should reportable items be the same or different 
for registered CEFs and BDCs?
     Should we expressly exclude affected funds from being 
required to report certain events covered by existing Form 8-K items, 
similar to the approach we took for asset-backed issuers? Which items 
should be covered by such an exclusion, and why? What are the potential 
benefits and costs of this approach?
     Beyond the proposed additional reporting items for 
affected funds, are there other events that are of such importance to 
investors that we should require affected funds to report these events 
on Form 8-K? What are these events, and why are they important to 
investors? What are the potential benefits and costs of requiring an 
affected fund to furnish or file a report on Form 8-K for such events? 
For example, are there events covered by rule 8b-16(b) under the 
Investment Company Act, other than material changes to a fund's 
investment objectives or policies, that an affected fund should be 
required to report on Form 8-K? \262\ Are there other ways we should 
modify Form 8-K to recognize differences between affected funds and 
operating companies?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \262\ See 17 CFR 270.8b-16(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     An affected fund would be required to file a Form 8-K for 
both proposed reporting items in Section 10. Should we instead permit 
an affected fund to furnish rather than file a Form 8-K report for any 
of the proposed new reporting items? If so, which item, and why? \263\ 
Should affected funds be permitted to furnish reports under certain 
items of Form 8-K that other issuers are required to file? 
Alternatively, should affected funds be required to file information 
that other issuers may furnish? Please explain any basis for treating 
affected funds differently.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \263\ A Form 8-K report that is ``furnished'' rather than 
``filed'' is not subject to section 18 of the Exchange Act or 
otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, unless the 
registrant specifically states that the information is to be 
considered ``filed'' under the Exchange Act or incorporates it by 
reference into a filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange 
Act. See General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

i. Material Change to Investment Objectives or Policies
    Information about an affected fund's investment objectives or 
policies, such as the types of instruments and investment practices it 
uses, is important to prospective investors and current shareholders to 
help inform their investment decisions. Currently, affected funds 
disclose information about a material change in their investment 
objectives or policies through a post-effective amendment to a 
registration statement (in the case of a fund that is selling its 
securities in a delayed or continuous offering) or a periodic report. 
For example, certain registered CEFs are not required to amend their 
registration statements on an annual basis as long as their annual 
reports to shareholders disclose, among other things, any material 
changes to the fund's investment objectives or policies that have not 
been approved by shareholders.\264\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \264\ See rule 8b-16 under the Investment Company Act [17 CFR 
270.8b-16].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Given the importance of this information to investors, we are 
proposing to require current disclosure about a material change in an 
affected fund's investment objectives or policies.\265\ Under proposed 
Item 10.01 of Form 8-K, an affected fund would be required to file a 
Form 8-K report if the fund's investment adviser, including any sub-
adviser, has determined to implement a material change to the 
registrant's investment objectives or policies, and such change has not 
been, and will not be, submitted to shareholders for approval.\266\ A 
reporting obligation would be triggered under this item once an 
affected fund's adviser determines to implement a material change that 
represents a new or different principal portfolio emphasis--including 
the types of securities in which the fund invests or will invest, or 
the significant investment practices or techniques that the fund 
employs or intends to employ--from the fund's most recent disclosure of 
its principal objectives or strategies.\267\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \265\ For these purposes, investment objectives or policies 
would mean the information specified in Item 8.2 of Form N-2. See 
proposed Instruction 1 to Item 10.01 of Form 8-K.
    \266\ A sub-adviser is typically responsible for the day-to-day 
portfolio management of some or all assets of a fund, subject to 
oversight by the fund's adviser and board of directors. We 
understand that sub-advisory agreements already establish procedures 
for a sub-adviser to communicate with the adviser or board about 
matters related to a fund's investment objectives or policies to, 
among other things, ensure that the fund's assets are being managed 
consistently with its disclosed investment objectives or policies.
    \267\ See proposed Instruction 2 to Item 10.01 of Form 8-K. The 
most recent disclosure would be the later of the most recent version 
of the fund's prospectus (i.e., that included in the fund's 
effective registration statement or as modified through post-
effective amendments or prospectus supplements) or its most recent 
periodic report. A BDC's most recent periodic report would be the 
most recently filed report on Form 10-Q or Form 10-K, while a 
registered CEF's most recent periodic report would be the most 
recently filed annual or semi-annual report to shareholders under 
rule 30b2-1 under the Investment Company Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A report under proposed Item 10.01 would disclose the date the 
adviser plans to implement the material change to the affected fund's 
objectives or policies, as well as a description of the material 
change. This description of the material change should help an investor 
understand the change and how it relates to the fund's current 
investment objectives and policies.\268\ Affected

[[Page 14478]]

funds also may disclose other information related to a material change 
in investment objective or policy in a Form 8-K report filed under 
proposed Item 10.01. For example, an affected fund could disclose 
material changes in the fund's risk factors that are associated with 
the material change to its investment objective or policy.\269\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \268\ The Form 8-K report should not, for example, solely 
discuss a new investment practice or technique without explaining 
how it relates to or modifies the fund's most recent disclosure of 
its investment objectives and policies.
    \269\ Affected funds are otherwise required to disclose material 
changes in risk factors in periodic or annual reports. See Item 1A 
to Part II of Form 10-Q (requiring BDCs to disclose any material 
change to risk factors previously disclosed in its annual report on 
Form 10-K); rule 8b-16(b)(4) (requiring registered CEFs to disclose 
any material change in the principal risk factors associated with 
investment in the fund in its annual report to shareholders).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Affected funds engaged in a delayed or continuous offering of their 
securities are subject to other requirements to update the disclosure 
in their registration statements. A fund would not be required to file 
a Form 8-K report under proposed Item 10.01 if it provides 
substantially the same information in a post-effective amendment.\270\ 
A fund that relies on the proposed short-form registration instruction 
could, however, update its registration statement by filing a Form 8-K 
report instead of a post-effective amendment.\271\ A registered CEF 
relying on rule 8b-16(b) to avoid updating its registration statements 
on an annual basis would continue to be required to disclose in its 
annual report to shareholders any material change in its investment 
objectives or policies.\272\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \270\ See proposed Instruction 3 to Item 10.01 of Form 8-K.
    \271\ See supra Part II.B.2.a. If the material change in the 
fund's investment objectives or strategies involves facts or events 
that, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental 
change in the information set forth in the fund's registration 
statement and the fund discloses this change on Form 8-K in lieu of 
filing a post-effective amendment, the date the fund filed the Form 
8-K report would be a new effective date of its registration 
statement for purposes of the last paragraph of section 11(a) of the 
Securities Act. See rule 158(c)(3) under the Securities Act [17 CFR 
230.158(c)(3)].
    \272\ See supra Part II.H.3.a (discussing our determination to 
not propose to remove or otherwise modify current disclosure 
requirements for registered CEFs that are similar to reportable 
events under Form 8-K). Additionally, we believe annual report 
disclosure of all material changes to a fund's investment objectives 
or policies that have occurred over the past year would continue to 
benefit shareholders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We request comment on our proposal to require Form 8-K disclosure 
if an affected fund's adviser has determined to make a material change 
to the fund's investment objectives or policies:
     Should a report under proposed Item 10.01 include 
different information than what we have proposed? Are there additional 
types of information that would be helpful to investors or the market? 
For example, should affected funds be required to report under proposed 
Item 10.01 any changes to principal risk factors that accompany a 
material change to the fund's investment objectives or policies that 
the fund discloses in such report? Why or why not?
     Current disclosure on Form 8-K is generally required 
within 4 business days after the relevant event occurs.\273\ Should we 
modify the timeframe in which an affected fund must file a report under 
proposed Item 10.01? If so, what is a more appropriate timeframe, and 
why should the reporting timeframe be different for proposed Item 10.01 
than the reporting timeframe for other items under Form 8-K? Rather 
than require disclosure within 4 business days after an affected fund's 
adviser has determined to implement a material change to the fund's 
investment objectives or policies, should we require an affected fund 
to file a report on Form 8-K concurrent with, or before, any material 
change to the fund's investment objectives or policies? Would this 
approach be administratively easier or more difficult for funds to 
implement in practice? Would this approach raise front-running concerns 
or impact the usefulness of information to investors or the market more 
generally?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \273\ See General Instruction B.1 of Form 8-K.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Is there a standard industry practice for approving a 
material change to a fund's investment objectives or policies before it 
is implemented? If so, is there a particular step in the approval 
process that should trigger the obligation to file a Form 8-K report 
under proposed Item 10.01? If there is not a standard industry 
practice, how could we modify the proposal to achieve more consistent 
reporting across affected funds? Are there differences between the 
approval process for funds with a single adviser and funds with one or 
more sub-advisers that we should take into account? \274\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \274\ See supra footnote 266 (discussing sub-advisers).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Instead of generally requiring current disclosure on Form 
8-K before a material change to the fund's investment objectives or 
policies is implemented, should we require Form 8-K disclosure after 
the adviser has begun to implement the material change? If so, when 
should we require disclosure? For example, should we require Form 8-K 
disclosure when the fund's investment portfolio has changed by a 
defined threshold (such as a 5% or 10% change in total assets invested 
in a particular industry, asset type, geography, or credit quality)? 
What are the advantages and disadvantages of this approach, including 
the impact on investors of less timely disclosure?
     Should we exempt registered CEFs from the requirement in 
rule 8b-16 to report material changes to a fund's investment objectives 
or policies in its annual report if they have already reported the 
change on Form 8-K? Why or why not?
     BDCs are required to disclose material changes to their 
risk factors on a quarterly basis, while registered CEFs are generally 
required to make this disclosure on an annual basis.\275\ Should 
registered CEFs be required to provide updated disclosure about 
material changes to risk factors on a more frequent basis, such as 
semi-annually in their shareholder reports? Why or why not?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \275\ See supra footnote 269.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

ii. Material Write-Downs
    Item 2.06 of Form 8-K requires a registrant to report certain 
information if it concludes that a material charge for impairment to 
one or more of its assets is required under GAAP applicable to the 
registrant. Because affected funds use fair value accounting to value 
their investments, Item 2.06 does not apply to them.\276\ To provide 
investors with consistent information and to promote parity with 
operating companies, we are proposing a new Form 8-K reporting item 
that is conceptually similar to Item 2.06, but tailored to the 
accounting method used by affected funds. Specifically, proposed Item 
10.02 would require reporting if an affected fund concludes that a 
material write-down in fair value of a significant investment is 
required under GAAP applicable to the affected fund. An affected fund 
would have a reporting obligation under this item once a conclusion 
that a material write-down is required is made in accordance with the 
fund's valuation procedures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \276\ In defining ``value,'' section 2(a)(41) of the Investment 
Company Act distinguishes between the market value of securities for 
which market quotations are readily available and the fair value, as 
determined in good faith by the board of directors, of other 
securities and assets. See 15 U.S.C. 80a-2(a)(41). Fair value 
accounting, as that term is used in GAAP, refers to the method 
investment companies use to value all investments, regardless of the 
availability of market quotations. Consistent with GAAP, we use fair 
value in proposed Item 10.02 to refer to the method for valuing any 
investment of an affected fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We believe a material decline in the valuation of one or more 
significant investments of an affected fund would be important to 
investors. Such a decline would likely have a significant impact on the 
value of an investment in

[[Page 14479]]

the fund. Further, unlike open-end funds, which must maintain 
sufficiently liquid assets in order to provide daily redemptions (and 
generally must limit their investments in illiquid securities to 15% of 
the fund's assets),\277\ affected funds often invest more significantly 
in less liquid investments where there is less publicly-available 
information surrounding events that may impact valuations.\278\ We 
recognize that affected funds--particularly registered CEFs--may hold a 
range of investment types, including liquid securities that have 
publicly-available pricing information. While investors may have less 
need for current disclosure on Form 8-K regarding a material write-down 
of an investment that has public pricing information, we propose to 
require affected funds to report a material write-down of any 
investment type, provided the investment is a significant size of the 
fund's portfolio. Capturing all investment types would provide greater 
and more uniform information to investors about potentially significant 
changes to the value of their investment in an affected fund. We 
propose to balance the broad scope of investment types that could 
trigger a reporting obligation by limiting this reporting item to only 
those investments that are significant in size.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \277\ See rule 22e-4 under the Investment Company Act [17 CFR 
270.22e-4]; Investment Company Liquidity Risk Management Programs, 
Investment Company Act Release No. 32315 (Oct. 13, 2016) [81 FR 
82142 (Nov. 18, 2016)].
    \278\ For example, there is often little information publicly 
available about private small and midsized businesses in which BDCs 
often invest. While an investor has access to a BDC's schedule of 
investments and the fair value of such investments on a quarterly 
basis, the investor generally has little insight into the operations 
of a portfolio company or events that may impact its value.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under proposed Item 10.02 of Form 8-K, an affected fund would be 
required to report the date it concluded that a material write-down in 
fair value was required and an estimate of the amount or range of 
amounts of the material write down. Although affected funds may not 
assess valuations of their investments on a continuous (i.e., daily or 
weekly) basis and are generally only required to calculate their NAVs 
at discrete times under the Investment Company Act (e.g., prior to 
selling shares or in connection with their periodic reports), we 
understand that affected funds typically monitor and review investment 
valuations between their periodic reports, particularly if a 
significant event occurs that is likely to impact the value of one or 
more sizable investments. An affected fund would be required to report 
on Form 8-K if it concludes that a material write-down of a significant 
investment is required in connection with this process. We recognize 
that a fund may write down the fair value of an investment for a 
variety of reasons, including company-specific considerations or events 
(such as bankruptcy) or macro-level events that cause a market decline 
in a certain sector or type of security. An affected fund would not be 
required to disclose the reasons it determined that a material write-
down of a significant investment is required.
    With respect to the requirement to report an estimate of the amount 
or range of amounts of the material write down, an affected fund would 
not be required to disclose an estimate in its initial report on Form 
8-K if it was unable to make a good faith estimate at the time it was 
required to file a Form 8-K report. However, the affected fund would be 
required to file an amended report on Form 8-K under this item within 4 
business days after it makes a determination of the estimate or range 
of estimates. This approach is similar to current reporting by 
operating companies under Item 2.06 of Form 8-K. We believe that this 
requirement would be more relevant for less liquid investments where 
the affected fund has discretion under GAAP to determine fair value.
    Instruction 1 to proposed Item 10.02 would clarify the meaning of a 
``significant'' investment for these purposes.\279\ An investment would 
be considered significant if the affected fund's and its other 
subsidiaries' investments in a portfolio holding exceed 10% of the 
total assets of the registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries.\280\ 
We are proposing that an investment be greater than 10% of the affected 
fund's total assets to be significant for these purposes to focus on 
material write-downs that may substantially affect a fund's NAV and, 
thus, would be of greater interest to investors. A 10% threshold also 
is consistent with our definition of acquisitions and dispositions that 
involve a significant amount of assets for purposes of Item 2.01 of 
Form 8-K.\281\ To determine whether a portfolio holding is significant, 
an affected fund would be required to aggregate investments in the same 
issuer.\282\ An affected fund would use the valuation of the portfolio 
holding prior to the material write-down to determine whether such 
holding exceeds 10% of total assets and, thus, is a significant 
investment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \279\ Item 2.06 of Form 8-K requires an operating company to 
report a material charge for impairment to one or more of its 
assets, including, without limitation, impairments of securities or 
goodwill. For purposes of affected funds, we believe it is 
appropriate to limit the requirement to report material write-downs 
to only those fund investments that are of a significant size 
relative to the fund's total portfolio. These material write-downs 
would be more likely to substantially affect a fund's NAV and would 
be more relevant to investors.
    \280\ Based on staff analysis, approximately 14% of affected 
funds hold investments that are greater than 10% of total assets. We 
anticipate that fewer funds would be required to file Form 8-K 
reports under the proposed item since a reporting obligation is not 
triggered unless a material write-down occurs.
    \281\ See Instruction 4 to Item 2.01 of Form 8-K.
    \282\ For example, if an affected fund held debt and equity 
securities issued by Company A, it would need to consider the 
percentage of total assets invested in Company A securities in the 
aggregate to determine whether it had a significant investment under 
proposed Item 10.02.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Like Item 2.06 of Form 8-K, an affected fund would not have to file 
a report under proposed Item 10.02 if the conclusion to materially 
write down a significant investment is made in connection with the 
preparation, review, or audit of financial statements required to be 
included in the next periodic report under the Exchange Act, the 
periodic report is filed on a timely basis, and such conclusion is 
disclosed in the report.\283\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \283\ See Instruction to Item 2.06 of Form 8-K; proposed 
Instruction 3 to proposed Item 10.02 of Form 8-K. The relevant 
periodic reports for registered CEFs would be annual and semi-annual 
reports to shareholders on Form N-CSR, while the relevant periodic 
reports for BDCs would be quarterly and annual reports on Form 10-Q 
and Form 10-K.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rather than propose to require Form 8-K disclosure about a material 
write-down of a significant investment, we considered proposing to 
require an affected fund to disclose a significant decline in the value 
of its investment portfolio as a whole. Specifically, we considered 
requiring an affected fund to report on Form 8-K when its NAV declines 
by more than 10% over a specified period. We recognize investors may 
have an interest in significant NAV declines for affected funds in 
which they invest since, like a material write-down, a significant 
decline in NAV will likely impact the value of their investments and 
may be useful to inform investment decisions.\284\ Additionally, a 
requirement to report a significant decline in NAV would more broadly 
apply to all affected funds, while the proposed material write-down 
requirement only applies to affected funds that hold large investments 
in a

[[Page 14480]]

single issuer.\285\ This broader scope could potentially enhance the 
information available to investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \284\ While shares of an affected fund do not necessarily trade 
at NAV, information about an affected fund's NAV could help the 
market to price an affected fund's shares in certain circumstances 
and could help an investor otherwise make investment decisions, 
including by being able to better assess the price of a fund's 
shares.
    \285\ See supra footnote 280.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    However, a requirement to report significant declines in NAV could 
result in a large amount of Form 8-K reporting by affected funds in the 
event of a general market downturn or, for funds invested in a 
particular sector, a downturn in that sector. Moreover, investors may 
already have access to readily-available public information (such as 
news reports, disclosure of fund strategies and portfolio holdings, and 
daily or weekly NAV information for some funds) that could reduce the 
value of this reporting. For example, with respect to affected funds 
that already publicly disclose their NAVs on a daily or weekly 
basis,\286\ Form 8-K reporting about declines in these funds' NAVs 
could be less timely than information that is already available to the 
market. Since affected funds publish their NAVs at different 
frequencies--from semi-annual to daily NAV reporting--there also is not 
a clear baseline for measuring declines in NAV across all affected 
funds. This variability likely would either result in inconsistent 
reporting standards for affected funds (e.g., if the 10% decline was 
measured from the most-recently published NAV) or reporting of stale 
information (e.g., if the 10% decline was measured from the NAV a 
registered CEF disclosed in its most recent semi-annual shareholder 
report, even if it publishes a daily NAV). Given these concerns, we 
preliminarily believe that the requirement to report material write-
downs of significant investments in proposed Item 10.02 would be more 
likely to provide investors with timely, relevant, and consistent 
information that they cannot otherwise discern from currently-available 
public disclosures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \286\ For example, many listed registered CEFs publicly disclose 
daily or weekly NAVs. See, e.g., Barron's Market Data Center for 
Closed-End Funds, available at http://www.barrons.com/mdc/public/page/2_3040-CEFmain.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We request comment on proposed Item 10.02 of Form 8-K, including 
potential alternatives for providing investors and the market with 
timely information about declines in the value of an affected fund's 
portfolio:
     Should a report under proposed Item 10.02 include 
different information than what we have proposed? Are there additional 
types of information that would be helpful to investors or the market?
     Should we modify the timeframe in which an affected fund 
must file a report under proposed Item 10.02? If so, what is a more 
appropriate timeframe, and why should the reporting timeframe be 
different for proposed Item 10.02 than the reporting timeframe for 
other items under Form 8-K, particularly Item 2.06?
     Should proposed Item 10.02 only require an affected fund 
to report a material write-down of certain types of investments, such 
as investments for which there are no readily available market 
quotations or investments that do not have publicly-available pricing 
information? For any investment types that should be excluded, please 
discuss the potential impact on investors (e.g., whether investors have 
existing sources of information to identify material declines in the 
value of significant portfolio holdings of an affected fund) and 
affected funds (e.g., the impact of the exclusion on an affected fund's 
reporting burden under proposed Item 10.02).
     Should we limit proposed Item 10.01 to certain types of 
affected funds? For example, do affected funds that consistently 
publish daily NAVs provide sufficient information to investors and the 
market about the value of their portfolios such that information about 
material write-downs would not be important?
     Should we modify our proposed definition of a significant 
investment to capture a smaller or larger investment size? If so, what 
is a more appropriate definition of significant investment for purposes 
of proposed Item 10.02, and why?
     Should a reporting obligation be triggered under proposed 
Item 10.02 when the affected fund concludes, in accordance with its 
valuation procedures, that a material write-down is required under 
GAAP, as proposed? Does this approach establish a sufficiently concrete 
guideline for determining when a reporting obligation has been 
triggered? If not, under what circumstances should an affected fund be 
required to report about a material write-down determination?
     Should the determination of a significant investment 
account for a group of investments in the same issuer that are 
significant in the aggregate? If not, why not? Should a fund also be 
required to aggregate derivatives investments that provide exposure to 
the same issuer or reference asset under certain circumstances? If so, 
when? If an affected fund were required to aggregate derivatives 
contracts, what values should it use? Because the market value of a 
derivatives contract will generally be small and will not reflect the 
market exposure provided by the contract, would it be more appropriate 
for a fund to aggregate the value of the underlying reference asset 
rather than the value of the derivatives contracts? Why or why not?
     Should we allow an affected fund to not file a Form 8-K 
report if the conclusion that a material write-down is required is made 
in connection with the preparation, review, or audit of financial 
statements required to be included in its next Exchange Act periodic 
report, the periodic report is timely filed, and the conclusion is 
disclosed in the report, as proposed? Why or why not?
     Do affected funds need more guidance on how to calculate 
whether a portfolio holding is a significant investment or on any other 
aspects of proposed Item 10.02?
     Instead of requiring affected funds to report material 
write-downs of significant investments on Form 8-K, should we require 
affected funds to use a different approach to provide information about 
declines in the value of their portfolio investments? For example, 
should we require affected funds to file Form 8-K reports when their 
NAVs decline by a specified percent (such as more than 10%) over a 
specified period? If so, what is the appropriate baseline for measuring 
a decline in NAV since affected funds publish their NAVs at different 
frequencies? For instance, should a NAV decline be measured against the 
most recently published NAV or the NAV disclosed in the fund's most 
recent periodic report? Is information about a NAV decline relevant for 
all affected funds, or should this requirement be limited to a subset 
of affected funds (e.g., those that do not publish a NAV on a daily 
basis or those that invest in less liquid investments that lack 
publicly-available pricing information)? How should such a Form 8-K 
reporting requirement interact with the undertaking in Item 34.1 of 
Form N-2? \287\ What information should we require in a Form 8-K report 
about a significant decline in NAV (e.g., the amount of the NAV 
decline, the date of the determination, and the associated impacts on 
the fund or its investors)?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \287\ This undertaking provides that an affected fund will amend 
its prospectus and suspend its offering in the interim if subsequent 
to the effective date of its registration statement, the NAV 
declines by more than 10% from its NAV as of the effective date of 
the registration statement. See Item 34.1 of Form N-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

iii. Impact on Eligibility Under the Proposed Short-Form Registration 
Instruction of Form N-2 and Safe Harbor
    While operating companies generally must timely file Exchange Act 
reports to be eligible to use Form S-3, there is an

[[Page 14481]]

exception for failing to timely file reports under certain Form 8-K 
items.\288\ Separately, companies that are required to report on Form 
8-K have a limited safe harbor from Exchange Act section 10(b) and rule 
10b-5 if they fail to file a report under many of the same Form 8-K 
items.\289\ For parity, we propose to implement this same general 
approach for affected funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \288\ Form S-3 requires, among other things, that a registrant 
has timely filed its required reports, other than reports required 
solely pursuant to Items 1.01, 1.02, 1.04, 2.03, 2.04, 2.05, 2.06, 
4.02(a), or 5.02(e) of Form 8-K. See General Instruction I.A.3(b) of 
Form S-3.
    \289\ See rules 13a-11(c) and 15d-11(c) under the Exchange Act 
[17 CFR 240.13a-11(c) and 17 CFR 240.15d-11(c)] (providing a limited 
safe harbor for failing to timely file a report required solely 
pursuant to Items 1.01, 1.02, 2.03, 2.04, 2.05, 2.06, 4.02(a), 
5.02(e), or 6.03 of Form 8-K). Notably, the safe harbor only applies 
to a failure to file a report on Form 8-K. It does not provide 
protection from section 10(b) and rule 10b-5 where an affected fund 
has a duty to disclose information for any reason apart from the 
Form 8-K requirement. See 2004 8-K Adopting Release, supra footnote 
245, at 15607. For example, the safe harbor would not protect a fund 
that files a short-form registration statement from liability under 
section 10(b) or rule 10b-5 (or other provisions of the federal 
securities laws) if the fund was engaged in an offering and its 
failure to file a Form 8-K report under an item covered by the safe 
harbor would result in the fund having a material misstatement or 
omission in its registration statement. See, e.g., section 10 of the 
Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. 78j]; sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 17(a) of 
the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 77k, 77l(a)(2), and 77q(a)]; rule 10b-
5 under the Exchange Act [17 CFR 240.10b-5]; rule 159 under the 
Securities Act [17 CFR 230.159].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As a general matter, the Commission has excluded Form 8-K items 
from the timeliness requirement of Form S-3 and provided a limited safe 
harbor for Form 8-K items when they require management to quickly 
assess the materiality of an event or to determine whether a disclosure 
obligation has been triggered.\290\ Thus, we believe it would be 
appropriate to allow affected funds to file short-form registration 
statements even if they fail to timely file reports required solely 
under proposed Items 10.01 or 10.02, in addition to the other Form 8-K 
items identified in Form S-3.\291\ We also propose to extend the safe 
harbor to proposed Items 10.01 and 10.02.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \290\ The Commission also has considered whether a company's 
sudden loss of eligibility to use Form S-3 under the circumstances 
could cause a potentially significant negative consequence that is 
disproportionate to an untimely Form 8-K filing. See 2004 8-K 
Adopting Release, supra footnote 245, at 15606-07.
    \291\ See proposed General Instruction A.2.a of Form N-2. Thus, 
an affected fund's failure to timely file a report required solely 
pursuant to Item 1.01, 1.02, 1.04, 2.03, 2.04, 2.05, 2.06, 4.02(a), 
5.02(e), 10.01, or 10.02 would not affect the fund's ability to meet 
the terms of General Instruction I.A.3(b) of Form S-3 for purposes 
of the short-form registration instruction of Form N-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Like operating companies that use Form S-3, an affected fund that 
elects to file a short-form registration statement on Form N-2 would 
need to be current in its Form 8-K filings with respect to all required 
items at the actual time of a Form N-2 filing.\292\ In addition, 
consistent with the approach for operating companies, the safe harbor 
from section 10(b) and rule 10b-5 included in rules 13a-11 and 15d-11 
would extend only until the due date of the affected fund's periodic 
report for the relevant period in which the Form 8-K was not timely 
filed.\293\ While we recognize that linking reporting compliance with 
continued eligibility to file a short-form registration statement on 
Form N-2 may result in loss of access to shelf registration, other 
issuers have long faced similar consequences. We believe it would be 
appropriate to extend the same treatment to affected funds to provide 
parity with operating companies, consistent with the BDC Act and 
Registered CEF Act, and in recognition of the important role of timely 
Exchange Act reporting in the shelf registration system.\294\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \292\ See General Instruction A.2.a of Form N-2; General 
Instruction I.A.3(a) of Form S-3.
    \293\ This is already the case for BDCs since they are required 
to file periodic reports on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K. See Item 5 of 
Form 10-Q and Item 9B of Form 10-K; 2004 Form 8-K Adopting Release, 
supra footnote 245, at 15607. We are proposing to add new 
Instruction 6.h to Item 24 of Form N-2 to require a registered CEF 
to disclose in its next shareholder report any information that it 
was required to disclose in a report on Form 8-K for the relevant 
half-year period but did not disclose.
    \294\ See supra Part II.B.2.a (discussing the importance of the 
timely reporting requirement for purposes of Form S-3 and the 
proposed Form N-2 short-form registration instruction).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We request comment on the proposed impact of delinquent Form 8-K 
filings on eligibility to file a short-form registration statement on 
Form N-2 and our proposed safe harbor amendments, particularly with 
respect to proposed Items 10.01 and 10.02:
     Should an affected fund lose its eligibility to file a 
short-form registration statement on Form N-2 or be disqualified from 
the safe harbor from section 10(b) and rule 10b-5 if it fails to timely 
report under proposed Items 10.01 or 10.02? If so, why should proposed 
Item 10.02 be treated differently than Item 2.06 of Form 8-K?
     Should affected funds be eligible to use the short-form 
registration instruction if they fail to timely file Form 8-K reports 
under other items, beyond those we have proposed? If so, which items, 
and why should affected funds be treated differently than operating 
companies for these purposes?
     For purposes of the safe harbor, should a registered CEF 
be required to disclose Form 8-K information that it has failed to 
timely report on a more frequent basis than semi-annually, given that 
BDCs and operating companies must disclose such information on a 
quarterly basis? If so, how should we implement such a change since 
registered CEFs are not subject to similar quarterly reporting 
requirements?
c. Additional Amendments to Form 8-K for Affected Funds
    We are proposing certain modifications to the General Instructions 
in Form 8-K, as well as instructions relating to specific reporting 
items, to make them more applicable to affected funds, particularly 
registered CEFs. These modifications will only apply to affected funds.
    With respect to the General Instructions to Form 8-K, we propose to 
add a modified definition of ``previously reported'' in General 
Instruction B.3 for registered CEFs. Currently, this instruction makes 
it clear that registrants are not required to report on Form 8-K if 
they have previously reported substantially the same information in a 
statement under section 12 of the Exchange Act, a report under section 
13 or 15(d), a definitive proxy statement or information statement 
under section 14, or a registration statement under the Securities 
Act.\295\ To recognize that registered CEFs also may report information 
under the Investment Company Act, we propose to amend the instructions 
to make it clear that registered CEFs are not required to make an 
additional report on Form 8-K if they have previously reported an event 
or transaction in a publicly-available filing described in rule 8b-2(i) 
of the Investment Company Act.\296\ This will include certain reports 
filed under section 30 and registration statements filed under section 
8 of the Investment Company Act. Similarly, we propose to add a 
reference to registration statements filed under the Investment

[[Page 14482]]

Company Act in General Instruction B.5.\297\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \295\ See rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act [17 CFR 240.12b-2] 
(defining ``previously reported'').
    \296\ See rule 8b-2(i) under the Investment Company Act [17 CFR 
270.8b-2(i)] (defining ``previously reported'' to include a 
registration statement filed under section 8 of the Investment 
Company Act or under the Securities Act, a report filed under 
section 30 of the Investment Company Act or section 13 or 15(d) of 
the Exchange Act, a definitive proxy statement filed under section 
20 of the Investment Company Act or section 14 of the Exchange Act, 
or a prospectus filed under the Securities Act). This proposal would 
not prevent a registered CEF from reporting on Form 8-K information 
previously reported in a section 30 report for purposes of forward 
incorporating such information into the registration statement by 
reference.
    \297\ Amended General Instruction B.5 would provide that, when 
considering current reporting on Form 8-K, particularly under Item 
7.01 (Regulation FD Disclosure) and Item 8.01 (Other Events), 
registrants should have due regard for the accuracy, completeness, 
and currency of information in registration statements filed under 
the Securities Act and the Investment Company Act that incorporate 
by reference information in Exchange Act reports, including reports 
on Form 8-K.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As for the amendments to existing reporting items, we are proposing 
clarifications to the instructions for Items 2.02 and 3.02 of Form 8-K 
to extend certain allowances to affected funds. With respect to Item 
2.02 (Results of Operations and Financial Condition), Instruction 4 to 
this Item currently states that a registrant is not required to report 
information under the Item when it is disclosing its results of 
operations and financial condition in a quarterly report on Form 10-Q 
or an annual report on Form 10-K. Since registered CEFs do not report 
information on these forms, we are proposing to provide the same 
treatment to shareholder reports that registered CEFs file with the 
Commission under rule 30b2-1 under the Investment Company Act.\298\ 
Similarly, Instruction 2 to Item 3.02 (Unregistered Sales of Equity 
Securities) allows smaller reporting companies to sell a larger 
percentage of unregistered securities (relative to the number of shares 
outstanding of the relevant class of equity securities) than other 
registrants before triggering a Form 8-K reporting obligation,\299\ but 
small affected funds would be unable to rely on the current 
provision.\300\ We propose to revise Instruction 2 to Item 3.02 to 
allow small affected funds to use the same 5% threshold available to 
smaller reporting companies.\301\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \298\ Rule 30b2-1 requires registered management investment 
companies to file on Form N-CSR any shareholder report required to 
be transmitted to shareholders under rule 30e-1 and to file a copy 
of every periodic or interim report or similar communication 
containing financial statements that is transmitted to a class of 
shareholders. See 17 CFR 270.30b2-1.
    \299\ This threshold is less than 5% for smaller reporting 
companies and less than 1% for other registrants.
    \300\ Instruction 2 to Item 3.02 currently refers to smaller 
reporting companies, as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K. 
This definition excludes issuers that are investment companies.
    \301\ We are proposing that an affected fund would be treated 
like a smaller reporting company for these purposes if it was an 
investment company identified in 17 CFR 270.0-10 (rule 0-10 under 
the Investment Company Act). An investment company is considered 
small under rule 0-10 if the investment company, together with other 
investment companies in the same group of related investment 
companies, has net assets of $50 million or less as of the end of 
its most recent fiscal year. See 17 CFR 270.0-10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We request comment on our additional proposed amendments to Form 8-
K:
     For purposes of General Instruction B.3 of Form 8-K, are 
there specific reports that a registered CEF makes under section 30 of 
the Investment Company Act that we should exclude or include in the 
definition of ``previously reported,'' such that a registered CEF would 
or would not be required to report information on Form 8-K if it 
previously reported substantially the same information in the relevant 
report? For example, should the definition of ``previously reported'' 
include information reported on Form N-CEN and information publicly 
reported on Form N-PORT, as proposed?
     With respect to asset-backed securities, Item 1.03 of Form 
8-K requires reporting if certain material parties to the asset-backed 
security enter bankruptcy proceedings or receivership. Should an 
affected fund be required to file a report on Form 8-K if its 
investment adviser enters bankruptcy or receivership? Why or why not?
     Is our proposed approach to modifying the definition of 
``smaller reporting companies'' for affected funds appropriate? If not, 
what category of affected funds should qualify as smaller reporting 
companies for purposes of Item 3.02 of Form 8-K? For example, should we 
use a standard similar to that in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K to 
define a smaller reporting company?
     Are there other amendments we should make to Form 8-K to 
improve current reporting by affected funds or to give them comparable 
treatment to operating companies required to report on Form 8-K?
d. Rule 103 of Regulation FD
    Rule 100 of Regulation FD generally requires an issuer to make 
either simultaneous or prompt public disclosure of any material 
nonpublic information regarding the issuer or its securities that the 
issuer or a person acting on its behalf has selectively disclosed to 
certain parties.\302\ As recognized above, an issuer may make this 
public disclosure by filing or furnishing information on Form 8-K.\303\ 
Rule 103(a) of Regulation FD provides that an issuer's failure to make 
a public disclosure required solely by rule 100 of Regulation FD will 
not affect whether, for purposes of eligibility to use Form S-3 and 
certain other forms, an issuer is deemed to have filed all materials 
required to be filed pursuant to section 13 or section 15(d) of the 
Exchange Act (i.e., whether the issuer is ``seasoned'') or to have 
filed such materials in a timely manner (i.e., whether the issuer is 
``timely'').\304\ The BDC Act requires us to amend rule 103(a) to 
provide that, with respect to BDCs, this section applies for purposes 
of Form N-2.\305\ To implement the BDC Act, and to provide parity for 
affected registered funds consistent with the Registered CEF Act, we 
propose to amend rule 103(a) to add references to Form N-2. As a 
result, for purposes of amended Form N-2, we would not consider an 
affected fund to have failed to file materials it is required to file 
pursuant to section 13 or section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, or to have 
failed to file these materials in a timely manner, if the affected fund 
fails to make public disclosure that is required solely by rule 100 of 
Regulation FD. Thus, failure to make a public disclosure required 
solely under rule 100 of Regulation FD would not impact an affected 
fund's ability to file a short-form registration statement or qualify 
as a WKSI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \302\ 17 CFR 243.100 (requiring simultaneous public disclosure 
in the case of an intentional selective disclosure or prompt public 
disclosure in the case of a non-intentional selective disclosure).
    \303\ See supra footnote 251.
    \304\ 17 CFR 243.103(a); Selective Disclosure and Insider 
Trading, Exchange Act Release No. 43154 (Aug. 15, 2000) [65 FR 
51716, 51725-26 (Aug. 24, 2000)].
    \305\ See section 803(b)(2)(O) of the BDC Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We request comment on our proposed amendment to rule 103 of 
Regulation FD:
     Do our proposed amendments to rule 103 of Regulation FD 
provide affected funds with comparable treatment to operating 
companies? If not, why not?
4. Online Availability of Information Incorporated by Reference
    Above, we discuss our proposal to permit expanded incorporation by 
reference for affected funds that choose to file a short-form 
registration statement on Form N-2.\306\ We are, in addition, proposing 
revisions to Form N-2's current General Instruction for Incorporation 
by Reference, which permits all registered CEFs and BDCs (not just 
those that would be eligible to file the proposed short-form 
registration statement) to backward incorporate their financial 
information into the prospectus or SAI. Specifically, we are proposing 
to remove the requirement that a fund deliver to new investors 
information that it has incorporated by reference into the prospectus 
or SAI, and instead require the fund to make its prospectus, SAI, and 
the incorporated materials readily available and

[[Page 14483]]

accessible on a website.\307\ Our proposal is designed to make readily 
available to investors documents that are incorporated by reference, 
and to facilitate the efficient use of incorporation by reference by 
affected funds.\308\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \306\ See supra footnote 47 and accompanying text.
    \307\ Proposed General Instruction F.4.a of Form N-2 would 
require a fund to post its prospectus, SAI, and any periodic and 
current Exchange Act reports that are incorporated by reference on a 
website maintained by or for the fund. Proposed General Instruction 
F.4.b of Form N-2 would also require funds to provide to any person 
to whom a prospectus or SAI is delivered any materials that were 
incorporated by reference upon request, at no charge.
    \308\ We would also conform certain incorporation by reference 
provisions of Form N-2 to mirror parallel provisions in Form N-1A, 
which has been more recently amended. See proposed General 
Instruction F.2.a-c of Form N-2; cf. General Instruction D.1(a)-(c) 
of Form N-1A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Although all registered CEFs and BDCs can ``backward incorporate'' 
certain financial information from previous Commission filings into 
their registration statements, Form N-2 currently requires that a fund 
provide to new purchasers a copy of all previously-filed materials that 
the fund incorporated by reference into the prospectus and/or SAI.\309\ 
For example, if the fund sells shares to a new investor, it must 
deliver to them the prospectus, along with the financial statements (or 
any other information) that is incorporated by reference into the 
prospectus. We understand that this requirement creates particular 
challenges for BDCs, which generally do not take advantage of the 
backward incorporation permitted by Form N-2 because they are required 
to include their financial statements in the prospectus.\310\ That 
means that if a BDC incorporates its financial statements by reference 
into the prospectus, every time it delivers a prospectus to an 
investor, it must determine whether the investor is a new investor, and 
if so, must also deliver any incorporated material. To avoid the 
operational challenges associated with identifying and providing 
different disclosure documents to new and existing investors, BDCs 
instead generally set forth the required financial and related 
information in the prospectus, which can double or even triple the 
length of a BDC's prospectus. Registered CEFs, in contrast, are 
required to include their financial statements in the SAI,\311\ which 
is delivered only upon request. Because we understand that funds 
typically receive very few requests for the SAI, registered CEFs, 
unlike BDCs, are only minimally affected by the requirement to deliver 
incorporated materials to new investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \309\ See supra footnote 22. Current General Instruction F.3 of 
Form N-2 requires the material incorporated by reference to be 
provided with the prospectus and/or the SAI to each person to whom 
the prospectus and/or the SAI is sent or given, unless the person 
holds securities of the fund and otherwise has received a copy of 
the material.
    \310\ See Item 8.6.c and Instruction 1.b to Item 24 of current 
Form N-2.
    \311\ See Instruction 1.a to Item 24 of current Form N-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This proposal is designed to make readily available to investors 
documents that are incorporated by reference by requiring an affected 
fund to make the incorporated materials, and the corresponding 
prospectus and SAI, readily available and accessible on a website 
maintained by or for the fund, as identified in the fund's prospectus 
and SAI.\312\ Affected funds would also be required to provide 
incorporated materials upon request free of charge. We do not believe 
that this proposal would result in a substantial reduction in the 
amount of information affected funds deliver to investors through the 
mail or electronically because most affected funds would rely on rules 
172 and 173, as we propose to amend them, to satisfy their prospectus 
delivery obligations. An issuer that uses these rules would satisfy its 
final prospectus delivery obligations by filing the prospectus with the 
Commission rather than delivering the prospectus and any incorporated 
materials to investors.\313\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \312\ Proposed General Instruction F.4.a of Form N-2; cf. 
General Instruction VII.F of Form S-1; Proposed General Instruction 
F.4.b(5) of Form N-2; cf. Item 12(c)(1)(v) of Form S-1. We would 
eliminate current General Instruction F.3, and move its requirement 
directing a fund to state in the prospectus and SAI that it will 
furnish, without charge, a copy of the incorporated materials on 
request, to proposed General Instruction F.4.b.
    \313\ See supra Part II.D.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    These proposed requirements mirror parallel requirements for 
certain operating companies that incorporate by reference, and the 
requirement to put a fund's prospectus and SAI on a website is 
consistent with requirements for open-end funds that choose to use a 
summary prospectus.\314\ In addition, many funds currently post their 
annual and semi-annual reports and other fund information on their 
websites.\315\ Given that the website posting of these types of 
disclosure documents has become commonplace for many operating 
companies and most funds, we believe it is reasonable to require an 
affected fund that chooses to incorporate by reference to post its 
prospectus and SAI online, along with any Exchange Act materials 
incorporated into those documents,\316\ and that investors likely 
expect to be able to access this information on fund websites. Retail 
investors, in particular, may be more inclined to look to a fund's 
website for its disclosure documents before turning to other sources 
for information.\317\A retail investor also could request to receive 
the materials directly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \314\ Cf. General Instruction VII.F of Form S-1; Securities Act 
rule 498(e) [17 CFR 230.498(e)]. We also recently proposed rule 
498A, which would, among other things, require variable annuity and 
variable life insurance contracts that choose to use a summary 
prospectus to post prospectus(es), SAIs, and certain Exchange Act 
reports online. See Variable Contract Summary Prospectus Proposing 
Release, supra footnote 172.
    \315\ See also, e.g., Optional internet Availability of 
Investment Company Shareholder Reports, Investment Company Act 
Release No. 33115 (June 5, 2018) [83 FR 29158 (June 22, 2018)] 
(providing funds the option of satisfying their obligations to 
transmit shareholder reports by making such reports and other 
materials accessible at a website address specified in a notice to 
investors); Enhanced Disclosure and New Prospectus Delivery Option 
for Registered Open End Management Investment Companies, Investment 
Company Act Release No. 28584 (Jan. 13, 2009) [74 FR 4546 (Jan. 26, 
2009)] (requiring open-end funds that opt to deliver summary 
prospectuses to investors to post prospectus and other disclosure 
materials on their websites).
    \316\ A fund must also deliver the incorporated materials upon 
request, at no charge. See proposed General Instruction F.4.b of 
Form N-2. Investors without internet access, or those that prefer 
not to review incorporated materials on a website, could obtain 
copies of the materials directly from the fund.
    \317\ Investor testing that the Commission sponsored and 
conducted in 2011 suggested that an investor looking for a fund's 
annual report is most likely to seek it out on the fund's website, 
rather than request it by mail or phone or by retrieving it from our 
Electronic Data, Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval System 
(``EDGAR''). See Investment Company Reporting Modernization, 
Investment Company Act Release No. 31610 (May 20, 2015) [80 FR 
33590, 33626-27 (June 12, 2015)].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, we are proposing to streamline Form N-2's current 
provisions regarding the disclosure requirements for incorporation by 
reference, which are spread across several provisions in current 
General Instruction F. We propose to replace these current instructions 
with a new General Instruction F.4, which largely mirrors the 
disclosure requirements in Item 12(c) of Form S-3. The new instruction 
largely streamlines--but does not substantively change--the disclosure 
requirements for incorporation by reference currently in Form N-2.\318\ 
The requirement to disclose the fund's website where the incorporated 
information may be accessed is a new addition, and is related to the 
proposed online

[[Page 14484]]

availability requirements for information that is incorporated by 
reference.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \318\ Compare proposed General Instruction F.4.b with current 
General Instruction F.3 of Form N-2; cf. Item 12(c) of Form S-3. For 
example, the proposed instruction, similar to Form N-2's current 
instruction, would require a fund to state in the prospectus and SAI 
that it will provide upon request a copy of the information that has 
been incorporated by reference into the prospectus or SAI but not 
delivered with the prospectus or SAI, and provide contact 
information for any request for incorporated information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We request comment generally on these proposed revisions for 
incorporation by reference, including:
     Should we, as proposed, eliminate the requirement that 
funds provide a copy of incorporated materials to new investors and 
instead require funds to make the incorporated materials, prospectus, 
and SAI available on a website? Why or why not?
     Would this proposal negatively affect investors' ability 
to receive incorporated information in light of the proposal to permit 
affected funds to satisfy their final prospectus delivery obligations 
by filing their prospectus with the Commission under rule 172? If so, 
how? Would investors without internet access have difficulty requesting 
the incorporated materials from the fund?
     Form N-2 only permits an affected fund to backward 
incorporate certain financial information into its prospectus or SAI. 
We are not proposing to expand the scope of information that may be 
backward incorporated into a fund's registration statement. Are there 
other items in Form N-2 that we should also permit to be backward 
incorporated by reference? If so, which ones and why?
     Does our proposal to require affected funds that 
incorporate by reference to post on a website their prospectuses, SAIs, 
and periodic and current reports filed under the Exchange Act that are 
incorporated by reference into the prospectus or SAI pose any 
particular challenges for funds? Is there any reason why funds should 
not be required to post this information on a website if they 
incorporate the information by reference into their registration 
statement? Are there other technological approaches that we should 
consider to make available to investors the information that is 
incorporated by reference?
     The online posting requirement for incorporated materials, 
as proposed, mirrors similar requirements in Form S-1. Should we be 
more specific regarding the criteria for online posting, similar to the 
requirements for open-end funds that use summary prospectuses? \319\ 
For example, should Form N-2 specify that the website maintained by or 
for the fund must be publicly-available, free of charge? Similarly, 
should we specify the format in which materials that are provided upon 
request must be delivered (electronically or in paper)? In what format 
do funds that receive requests for incorporated materials currently 
deliver such documents?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \319\ Rule 498(e) under the Securities Act [17 CFR 230.498(e)] 
(mutual funds and ETFs); see also Variable Contract Summary 
Prospectus Proposing Release, supra footnote 172 (proposing 
Securities Act rule 498A(h) for variable contracts).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Our proposed amendments to Form N-2's current provisions 
regarding the disclosure requirements for incorporation by reference 
are designed to streamline--but not substantively change--the 
disclosure requirements for backward incorporation by reference 
currently in Form N-2. Do the proposed amendments have this effect?
     Are there any other changes we should make to the proposed 
incorporation by reference regime?
5. Enhancements to Certain Registered CEFs' Annual Report Disclosure
    As a general matter, registered investment companies are required 
to update their registration statements annually.\320\ Registered CEFs 
may take advantage of an exemption that permits them to forgo an annual 
update provided that they disclose in their annual reports certain key 
changes that have occurred during the prior year.\321\ For example, the 
fund must disclose any material changes in its investment objectives or 
policies that have not been approved by shareholders, and any material 
changes in the principal risk factors associated with an investment in 
the fund.\322\ We are concerned, however, that funds disclosing 
important changes may not always provide enough context for investors 
to understand the implications of those changes. For example, if a fund 
does not provide sufficient context, a shareholder may have to look at 
a series of documents--from the fund's prospectus, which could be 
several years old, plus each subsequent annual report--to understand 
the fund's current investment strategy or principal risk factors.\323\ 
This may burden investors and frustrate the goal of providing 
shareholders with important disclosures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \320\ Rule 8b-16 under the Investment Company Act requires all 
registered management investment companies, including registered 
CEFs, to update their registration statements with the Commission on 
an annual basis.
    \321\ Rule 8b-16(b).
    \322\ The rule 8b-16 exemption is conditioned on disclosure in 
the annual report of information that repeats or updates certain key 
prospectus disclosures, specifically: (1) Information about the 
fund's dividend reinvestment plan; (2) material changes in the 
fund's investment objectives or policies that have not been approved 
by shareholders; (3) any change concerning the fund's control 
provisions that has not been approved by shareholders; (4) material 
changes in the principal risk factors associated with an investment 
in the fund; and (5) any portfolio manager changes. Except for 
information about the fund's dividend reinvestment plan (which 
requires a complete description of the plan), the fund must only 
disclose changes that have occurred during the year covered by the 
annual report.
    \323\ See, e.g., Comment Letter from Amy Wellington (Sept. 3, 
2018) (noting that there is no one location where a registered CEF 
investor can find a fund's strategies, risks and fees; because the 
annual report only discloses changes to the fund's strategies and 
policies, investors must review the original prospectus and each 
subsequent shareholder report to get all of the fund's information). 
This comment letter was provided in response to our June 2018 
Investor Experience Request for Comment, see infra footnote 206, in 
which we sought input from individual investors on how to enhance 
fund disclosures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To allow investors in funds relying on rule 8b-16 to more easily 
identify and understand key information about their investments, we 
propose to amend the rule to require funds to describe any changes in 
enough detail to allow investors to understand each change and how it 
may affect the fund. For example, to the extent a fund's principal 
investment objectives and policies or principal risk factors have 
changed, the fund should describe its investment objectives or 
principal risk factors before and after the change. This would provide 
context for the change and identify for the investor the fund's current 
strategy or principal risk factors. We also propose to require funds to 
preface such disclosures with a legend clarifying that the disclosures 
provide only a summary of certain changes that have occurred in the 
past year, and also state that the summary may not reflect all of the 
changes that have occurred since the investor purchased the fund.\324\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \324\ See proposed rule 8b-16(e) under the Investment Company 
Act (requiring changes required by paragraphs (b)(2) through (b)(5) 
of rule 8b-16 to be described in enough detail to allow investors to 
understand each change and how it may affect the fund, and prefaced 
with a legend stating that ``[t]he following information [in this 
annual report] is a summary of certain changes since [date]. This 
may not reflect all of the changes that have occurred since you 
purchased [this fund].'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We request comment on this proposal:
     Would requiring funds that rely on rule 8b-16 to describe 
changes to the fund in enough detail to allow investors to understand 
each change and how it may affect the fund, as proposed, improve the 
quality and scope of the disclosures that investors in these funds 
currently receive? To what extent are funds already doing this 
voluntarily?
     We also are proposing to require affected funds to report 
on Form 8-K if the fund's investment adviser, including any sub-
adviser, has determined to implement a material change to the 
registrant's investment objectives or policies, and such change has not 
been, and will not be, submitted to shareholders for approval. How 
would Form 8-K reports affect the benefits to

[[Page 14485]]

investors of receiving contextual information in annual reports?
     Would a fund understand what level of detail the proposed 
rule amendments would require it to disclose? Would a fund understand 
what it means to describe how a change may affect the fund? Would any 
additional clarification in the rule text or guidance be helpful?
     What is the adequacy of information about registered CEFs 
in the secondary market in general? Where can investors in a fund with 
a stale prospectus look to find information about the fund's current 
strategies and risks, or other key information? Do registered CEF 
investors have access to sufficient information to make knowledgeable 
investment decisions concerning their investments in these funds?
     Should we require funds that rely on rule 8b-16 to update 
their registration statements on a periodic basis, for example, every 3 
years, as required for certain issuers with shelf registration 
statements to bring the disclosures current? Alternatively, should we 
require funds to summarize in their annual report certain key 
information that would be required in a current prospectus that has 
been annually updated? If so, what information should be required (for 
example, only the disclosure items that are specified in rule 8b-16, or 
certain other Form N-2 disclosure items)? Should we consider making any 
other changes to rule 8b-16? If so, what changes and why?

I. Certain Staff No-Action Letters

    Rule 486(b) permits interval funds to file certain post-effective 
amendments to their registration statement that become effective 
automatically, including an amendment to bring the financial statements 
up to date under section 10(a)(3). The rule is designed to recognize 
that interval funds may need continuously effective registration 
statements and would benefit if certain filings could become effective 
automatically.\325\ Our staff has stated that it would not recommend 
that the Commission take any enforcement action under section 5(b) or 
6(a) of the Securities Act against specific listed registered CEFs 
conducting offerings under rule 415(a)(1)(x) on a case-by-case basis 
regarding their use of rule 486(b).\326\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \325\ See Post-Effective Amendments to Investment Company 
Registration Statements, Securities Act Release No. 7083 (Aug. 17, 
1994) [59 FR 43460 (Aug. 24, 1994)] (in adopting rule 486, we noted 
that ``[t]he initial proposal of rule 486 recognized that closed-end 
interval funds may need continuously effective registration 
statements and would benefit if certain filings could become 
effective automatically'').
    \326\ See, e.g., Nuveen California Select Tax-Free Income 
Portfolio, SEC Staff No-Action Letter (Nov. 21, 2017), PIMCO Dynamic 
Income Fund, SEC Staff No-Action Letter (Dec. 12, 2017), Eagle Point 
Credit Company, Inc., SEC Staff No-Action Letter (Feb. 14, 2018), 
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund and PIMCO Income 
Opportunity Fund, SEC Staff No-Action Letter (Sep. 13, 2018), and 
DNP Select Income Fund, Inc., SEC Staff No-Action Letter (Oct. 4, 
2018). Our staff has not provided these no-action assurances to any 
BDC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The amendments we are proposing today are designed to address the 
process by which affected funds, including listed registered CEFs 
offering their securities under rule 415(a)(1)(x), may update their 
registration statements. The amendments would provide a consistent 
regulatory framework for all affected funds. Staff in the Division of 
Investment Management are reviewing these no-action letters to 
determine if they should be withdrawn in connection with any final 
rules we adopt under this proposal.
    We request comment on whether we should make any changes to rule 
486(b) to address the concerns expressed by funds that sought no-action 
assurances from the staff:
     Should we, for example, permit all or a broader group of 
registered CEFs or BDCs to rely on the rule? Why or why not?
     To what extent would expanding the availability of rule 
486(b) complement, or conversely, create any tension with, the 
amendments we are proposing in this release? For example, if we 
permitted all affected funds to rely on rule 486(b), would funds that 
would be eligible to file a short-form registration statement on Form 
N-2 choose to use rule 486(b) to update their registration statements, 
or would they choose to file a short-form registration statement and 
update it through Exchange Act reports incorporated by reference? Which 
approach would be more efficient for funds and why? Would either 
approach be more beneficial to investors? If so, which approach and 
why? Would using rule 486(b) be more or less efficient for BDCs or 
registered CEFs?

J. Conforming Changes to Form N-2

    In addition to the proposed amendments to Form N-2 discussed 
throughout this release that are meant to implement the statutory 
mandates and tailor the disclosure and regulatory framework for 
affected funds in light of the proposed amendments to the offering 
rules, we also are proposing certain non-substantive changes to the 
form. These additional proposed changes are designed to provide greater 
consistency with similar or parallel provisions in Forms N-1A, S-1, and 
S-3, all of which have been more recently amended than Form N-2. For 
example, we are proposing stylistic changes, including the renumbering 
of certain items, and the elimination of outdated references, such as 
the instruction related to paper copies, which are generally no longer 
filed, and the requirement to provide a table of contents in an 
affected fund's SAI.\327\ We request comment on these proposed 
amendments to Form N-2:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \327\ We have also adopted certain changes to Form N-2 in the 
FAST Act rulemaking. See FAST Act Modernization Adopting Release, 
supra footnote 177. Those amendments, as part of a broader 
initiative to modernize and simplify certain disclosure requirements 
in Regulation S-K (and related rules and forms), revise certain 
rules on incorporation by reference, and require all of the 
information on the cover pages of some Exchange Act forms to be 
tagged in Inline XBRL format.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Do commenters agree that the proposed amendments to Form 
N-2 that are not discussed elsewhere in this release are appropriate?
     Because some affected funds have received exemptive relief 
to offer different share classes, our proposal to require registered 
CEFs to include MDFP in their annual shareholder reports includes an 
instruction requiring funds with multiple share classes to reflect the 
performance for each class. Should we revise Form N-2 to clarify any 
other disclosure requirements for multi-class funds?
     Are there additional stylistic or similar changes we 
should make to Form N-2 to provide greater consistency with similar or 
parallel provisions in our other disclosure forms or otherwise to 
improve Form N-2's readability? Which changes and why?
     Should we make any technical changes or corrections to 
Form N-2? For example, Instruction 1.a. to Item 8.6.c of Form N-2, 
which requires BDCs to include financial statements in the prospectus, 
directs BDCs to comply with provisions of Regulation S-X that apply to 
registered investment companies. This includes a cross-reference to 
rule 3-18 of Regulation S-X, which includes the financial statement 
timing requirements for registered investment companies. Rule 3-12 of 
Regulation S-X, however, specifically prescribes the age of financial 
statements for Exchange Act reporting companies, like BDCs. BDCs, as a 
matter of practice follow rule 3-12. Should we revise the instruction 
to make clear that BDCs should follow the requirements in rule 3-12 
(and not rule 3-18) for financial statement timing purposes? If not, 
why not?

[[Page 14486]]

     Should we make any other conforming changes to Form N-2? 
For example, while registered CEFs are required to discuss the material 
factors and conclusions that formed the basis for the board's approval 
of any investment advisory contract in its shareholder reports,\328\ 
BDCs are not required to provide this disclosure.\329\ Should we create 
such a requirement for BDCs? Why or why not? If yes, where and when 
should BDCs provide the disclosure--in any Exchange Act report filed 
within a certain period after board approval (e.g., 90 days), or only 
in certain reports (e.g., Form 10-K)? Should the disclosure requirement 
be set forth in Form N-2, or in the form requirements for any relevant 
Exchange Act reports (i.e., Forms 10-Q or 10-K), or elsewhere?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \328\ See Instructions 6.e and 6.f of Item 24 of Form N-2; see 
also Item 27(d)(6)(i) of Form N-1A (parallel provision for open-end 
funds).
    \329\ The relevant disclosure requirement is contained in a sub-
part of Instruction 6 of Item 24 of Form N-2, which specifically 
concerns annual and semi-annual reports required by section 30(e) of 
the Investment Company Act and rule 30e-1 thereunder. Because BDCs 
do not file these reports, they are not subject to this instruction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

K. Compliance Date

    We propose to provide a transition period after the publication of 
a final rule in the Federal Register to give affected funds sufficient 
time to comply with four of the proposed new requirements, as follows:
     Form 8-K. All affected funds that would be eligible to 
file a short-form registration statement would be required to comply 
with the full scope of Form 8-K as proposed,\330\ including the new 
Form 8-K items for affected funds, by the earlier of: (1) One year 
after the publication of a final rule in the Federal Register, or (2) 
the date a fund first files a short-form registration statement under 
General Instruction A.2 of Form N-2. All other affected funds would be 
required to comply 18 months after the date of the publication of a 
final rule in the Federal Register.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \330\ See supra Part II.H.3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     MDFP. Any annual report that a registered CEF files one 
year or more after the publication of a final rule in the Federal 
Register would be required to include the proposed MDFP 
disclosures.\331\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \331\ See supra Part II.H.2.b.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Structured Data Requirements. All affected funds subject 
to the financial statement or prospectus structured data reporting 
requirements that would be eligible to file a short-form registration 
statement would be required to comply with those provisions no later 
than 18 months after the date of publication of a final rule in the 
Federal Register. All other affected funds subject to those 
requirements would be required to comply 24 months after publication of 
a final rule in the Federal Register. All filers on Form 24F-2 would be 
required to comply with the proposed structured data format for this 
form \332\ no later than 18 months after the publication of a final 
rule in the Federal Register.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \332\ See supra Part II.H.1.d.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Rule 24f-2. The proposed amendments to rules 23c-3 and 
24f-2 \333\ would become effective one year after the publication of a 
final rule in the Federal Register.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \333\ See supra Part II.G.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We request comment on the proposed compliance dates, and 
specifically on the following items:
     Are the proposed compliance dates appropriate? If not, why 
not? Is a longer or shorter period necessary to allow registrants to 
comply with one or more of these particular amendments? If so, what 
would be a recommended compliance date?
     Do any other proposed amendments warrant an extended 
compliance period? If so, which ones, why, and what would be an 
appropriate compliance date? For example, should affected funds be 
given a compliance period within which to transition from filing forms 
of prospectuses that vary from the registration statement pursuant to 
rule 497 to filing such forms pursuant to rule 424? Are there any 
complexities about this change in the filing process that would justify 
providing a compliance period? If so, what are those complexities, and 
how long would affected funds need to adjust to this change?
     Should we provide affected funds with a different 
compliance date, or a transition period, before they are required to 
comply with the full scope of the proposed new Form 8-K requirements? 
If so, how long should the transition period be, and how should any 
transition period be structured? For example, should all affected funds 
be permitted to rely on an extended compliance date or any transition 
period with respect to filing the new proposed reportable events, or 
should such accommodations be available only to registered CEFs 
(because, in contrast to BDCs, they generally have not previously been 
required to report on Form 8-K)?

III. General Request for Comment

    We request and encourage any interested person to submit comments 
regarding the proposed rules and forms, specific issues discussed in 
this release, and other matters that may have an effect on the proposed 
rules and forms. With regard to any comments, we note that such 
comments are of particular assistance to our rulemaking initiative if 
accompanied by supporting data and analysis of the issues addressed in 
those comments.

IV. Economic Analysis

    We are proposing amendments to our rules designed to carry out the 
requirements of section 803 of the BDC Act and section 509 of the 
Registered CEF Act and tailor the disclosure and regulatory framework 
for affected funds in light of the proposed amendments to the offering 
rules applicable to them. Currently, affected funds face regulatory 
impediments to capital formation as they are not able to use the 
flexible and less costly offering process that operating companies use 
when conducting registered securities offerings. This may hinder 
affected funds' ability to raise capital, take advantage of favorable 
market conditions as operating companies do, and enjoy lower cost of 
capital and lower offering costs. Additionally, because of existing 
rules, affected funds are unable to communicate about an offering 
before a registration statement is filed, and their post-filing 
communications are subject to prospectus liability under section 12 of 
the Securities Act (or must be accompanied or preceded by the statutory 
prospectus). The proposed rules would provide incremental flexibility 
to funds in their communications, which may increase the flow of 
information to investors. As discussed in detail above, the proposed 
rules would affect numerous distinct aspects of how our securities 
offering and communications rules apply to affected funds. The proposed 
rules would:
     Streamline the registration process to allow eligible 
affected funds to use a short-form registration statement to sell 
securities ``off the shelf'' more quickly and efficiently in response 
to market opportunities; \334\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \334\ See supra Part II.B.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Allow affected funds to qualify as WKSIs under rule 405 
under the Securities Act; \335\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \335\ See supra Part II.C.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Allow affected funds to satisfy final prospectus delivery 
requirements using the same method as operating companies; \336\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \336\ See supra Part II.D.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Allow affected funds to use communications rules currently 
available to operating companies, such

[[Page 14487]]

as the use of certain factual business information, forward-looking 
information, a free writing prospectus, and broker-dealer research 
reports; \337\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \337\ See supra Part II.E.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Modify certain aspects of affected funds' disclosure and 
regulatory framework in light of the proposed amendments to the 
offering rules applicable to them.\338\ These proposed amendments 
include structured data requirements to make it easier for investors 
and others to analyze fund data; new annual report disclosure 
requirements to provide key information in these reports; a new 
requirement for registered CEFs to file reports on Form 8-K in parity 
with operating companies and BDCs, including new Form 8-K items 
tailored to registered CEFs and BDCs; and a proposal to require 
interval funds to pay securities registration fees using the same 
method that mutual funds and ETFs use today.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \338\ See supra Parts II.F-II.H.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Introduction and Baseline

    We are sensitive to the economic effects that may result from the 
rule proposal, including the benefits, costs, and the effects on 
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. Section 3(f) of the 
Exchange Act, section 2(b) of the Securities Act, and section 2(c) of 
the Investment Company Act state that when engaging in rulemaking that 
requires us to consider or determine whether an action is necessary or 
appropriate in (or, with respect to the Investment Company Act, 
consistent with) the public interest, to consider, in addition to the 
protection of investors, whether the action will promote efficiency, 
competition, and capital formation. Additionally, section 23(a)(2) of 
the Exchange Act requires us, when making rules or regulations under 
the Exchange Act, to consider, among other matters, the impact that any 
such rule or regulation would have on competition and states that the 
Commission shall not adopt any such rule or regulation which would 
impose a burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the Exchange Act.
    We have considered the potential costs and benefits that would 
result from the proposed rules, as well as the potential effects on 
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. Many of the potential 
economic effects of the proposed rules would stem from the statutory 
mandates, while others would stem from the discretion we are 
exercising. We discuss the potential economic effects of the proposed 
amendments to implement the statutory mandates in Parts IV.B and IV.C. 
We considered certain alternatives to our proposed approach to 
implementing the statutory mandate, as discussed in Part IV.D. We are 
also proposing certain other amendments to tailor affected funds' 
disclosure and regulatory framework. We discuss the potential economic 
effects of these discretionary amendments, as well as reasonable 
alternatives to these provisions, in Part IV.E. We note that, where 
possible, we have attempted to quantify the costs, benefits, and 
effects on efficiency, competition, and capital formation expected to 
result from the proposed rule. In some cases, however, we are unable to 
quantify the economic effects because we lack the information necessary 
to provide a reasonable and reliable estimate.
    The baseline we use to analyze the potential effects of the 
proposed rules is the current set of legal requirements and market 
practices. The proposed rules likely would have a significant impact on 
the security offering requirements and disclosure practices of affected 
funds. The overall magnitude of the benefits and the costs associated 
with the proposed rules will depend on many factors, including the 
number of affected funds that rely on the proposed rules. We recognize 
that some affected funds would not satisfy the conditions in certain of 
the proposed amendments (e.g., those limited to WKSIs or funds that 
file a short-form registration statement on Form N-2), and other 
affected funds may satisfy the conditions but choose not to rely on the 
proposed rules. The discussion below describes our understanding of the 
markets and issuers that would be affected by the proposed rules.
1. Number of Affected Funds
    The proposed rules would affect BDCs and registered CEFs. As of 
September 30, 2018, there were 807 affected funds, including 103 BDCs 
and 704 registered CEFs. To estimate the number of BDCs, we use data 
from Form 10-K and 10-Q filings as of September 30, 2018, the latest 
data available.\339\ We identify 49 listed BDCs and 54 unlisted BDCs. 
The average net assets of the listed BDCs is approximately $729 
million, and the average of their total assets is $1.3 billion. Based 
on trading data as of June 30, 2018, 44 of the listed BDCs have public 
float greater than $75 million (i.e., one of the transaction 
requirement thresholds for primary offerings under the short-form 
registration instruction) and 14 of those BDCs have public float 
greater than $700 million (i.e., the WKSI public float threshold).\340\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \339\ The estimated number of BDCs includes BDCs that have not 
registered a securities offering on Form N-2. Certain of our 
proposed amendments, such as the proposed requirement to tag certain 
Form N-2 prospectus disclosure items in Inline XBRL, would only 
apply to affected funds that have filed a registration statement on 
Form N-2. As a result, our quantitative estimates of the costs and 
paperwork burdens of these proposed amendments with respect to BDCs 
may be over-estimates in certain respects.
    \340\ The most recent available data (as of June 30, 2018) on 
prices and shares outstanding, which are used to calculate the 
public float, is taken from the Center for Research of Securities 
Prices (``CRSP'') database. CRSP data on shares outstanding includes 
all publicly held shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We use data from Morningstar and SEC filings to estimate the number 
of registered CEFs.\341\ We identify 516 registered CEFs that were 
listed on an exchange as of September 30, 2018, including 1 interval 
fund. There were 188 unlisted registered CEFs as of September 30, 2018, 
including 56 interval funds. The average net assets of the listed 
registered CEFs is approximately $539 million, while the average net 
assets of the unlisted registered CEFs is approximately $461 
million.\342\ Based on trading data as of June 30, 2018, 457 of the 
listed registered CEFs have public float greater than $75 million, and 
83 of those funds have public float greater than $700 million.\343\ 
Information about the types of offerings conducted by different 
categories of affected funds for the period of January 1, 2014-December 
31, 2018 is reflected in the below table.\344\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \341\ The estimated number of registered CEFs includes 
registered CEFs that have not registered a securities offering under 
the Securities Act. Certain of our proposed amendments, such as the 
proposed requirement that registered CEFs report on Form 8-K, 
generally would not apply to these registered CEFs. See, e.g., supra 
footnote 243. Thus, our quantitative estimates of the costs and 
paperwork burdens of certain of the proposed amendments with respect 
to registered CEFs may be over-estimates in certain respects.
    \342\ The average of net assets of registered interval funds is 
$448 million.
    \343\ This includes the listed interval fund, which had public 
float of approximately $76 million as of June 30, 2018. Data on 
prices and shares outstanding, which are used to calculate the 
public float, is taken from CRSP.
    \344\ Data on registered offerings (initial public offerings, 
equity offerings by seasoned issuers, convertible debt offerings, 
and public debt offerings) for BDCs and listed registered CEFs are 
taken from Securities Data Corporation's New Issues database 
(Thomson Financial). Data on Regulation D offerings was collected 
from all Form D filings (new filings and amendments) on EDGAR. Data 
on registered offerings for unlisted registered CEFs was collected 
from Form N-2 and Form N-CSR filings on EDGAR.

[[Page 14488]]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                              Listed registered     Unlisted registered
         Types of offerings            Offering statistics         Listed BDCs           Unlisted BDCs               CEFs                   CEFs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Registered offerings...............  Number of offerings...  114...................  24...................  31...................  144.
                                     Total amount raised...  $11.7 bil.............  $1.7 bil.............  $5.9 bil.............  $21.4 bil.
                                     Average (median)        $102.8 mil ($65.5 mil)  $7.8 mil ($7.2 mil)..  $190.5 mil ($103.1     $177.3 mil ($31.0
                                      offering amount.                                                       mil).                  mil).
Regulation D offerings.............  Number of offerings...  13....................  72...................  .....................  167.
                                     Total amount raised...  $720.8 mil............  $20.5 bil............  .....................  $6.4 bil.
                                     Average (median)        $55.4 mil ($32.7 mil).  $284.3 mil ($76.3      .....................  $38.3 mil ($6.5 mil).
                                      offering amount.                                mil).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Current Securities Offering Requirements for Affected Funds
    The securities offering process for affected funds at present 
differs from that for operating companies. Affected funds register 
their securities offerings on Form N-2, while operating companies use 
other forms (e.g., Form S-1 or Form S-3). As discussed above, 
registered investment companies and BDCs are excluded from certain 
offering and communication rules available to operating companies.
    Affected funds are expressly excluded from the WKSI definition. As 
a result, even if they would otherwise meet the WKSI definition, they 
are unable to, for example, file an automatic shelf registration 
statement or communicate about an offering before filing a registration 
statement.
    Affected funds currently can make shelf offerings under rule 
415(a)(1)(x) if they meet the eligibility criteria for Form S-3, even 
though affected funds register their securities offerings on Form N-2. 
Affected funds, however, currently face certain challenges in using the 
shelf registration system. These challenges are generally due to the 
fact that, unlike operating companies, affected funds cannot: Forward 
incorporate information from subsequently-filed Exchange Act reports 
into their registration statements, rely on Securities Act rule 430B to 
omit certain information from the ``base'' prospectus, or use the 
process that operating companies use to file prospectus 
supplements.\345\ For example, when an affected fund sells or ``takes 
down'' securities from a shelf registration statement, like an 
operating company, its registration statement must include all required 
information, including any annual update of financial information that 
section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act requires. However, unlike an 
operating company, an affected fund must provide any section 10(a)(3) 
update to its registration statement by filing a post-effective 
amendment, with associated expenses and potential delays related to the 
fund's preparation of the amendment and our staff's review and comment 
process. In contrast, an operating company filing on Form S-3 would 
generally make the section 10(a)(3) update by timely filing its annual 
report on Form 10-K containing the issuer's audited financial 
statements for the most recently completed fiscal year. The financial 
statements would be forward incorporated by reference into the 
operating company's registration statement and, thus, the company would 
avoid the need to file a post-effective amendment to comply with 
section 10(a)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \345\ See supra Part II.B.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, affected funds' communications generally are subject to 
rule 482 under the Securities Act.\346\ Affected funds can use these 
communications only after a fund has filed a registration 
statement.\347\ These communications are deemed to be prospectuses that 
are subject to prospectus liability under section 12 of the Securities 
Act. Rule 138, one of our rules governing research reports published by 
broker-dealers, does not currently specifically exclude BDCs and 
registered CEFs from research coverage. The rule's conditions are 
designed for operating companies, however, and therefore can 
effectively preclude broker-dealers from relying on the rule to publish 
research reports on affected funds. Broker-dealers can, however, 
publish research reports on affected funds under rule 139b or rule 
482.\348\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \346\ Affected funds also may engage in communications that are 
not deemed a prospectus under section 2(a)(10) of the Securities Act 
(e.g., communications that are accompanied or preceded by a 
statutory prospectus). See 15 U.S.C. 77b(a)(10).
    \347\ We recently issued a proposal that would allow issuers, 
including affected funds, to engage in oral or written 
communications with potential investors that are, or are reasonably 
believed to be, qualified institutional buyers or institutional 
accredited investors, either prior to or following the filing of a 
registration statement, to determine whether such investors might 
have an interest in a contemplated registered securities offering. 
If this rule is adopted, affected funds would be permitted to engage 
in certain communications with qualified institutional buyers and 
institutional accredited investors outside the context of rule 482 
or the communications rules we are proposing to extend to affected 
funds in this release. See Solicitations of Interest Prior to a 
Registered Public Offering, Securities Act Release No. 10607 (Feb. 
19, 2019) [84 FR 6713 (Feb. 28, 2019)].
    \348\ See supra Part II.E.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As a general matter, affected funds are limited in their ability to 
incorporate information into their registration statements by reference 
and are required to deliver a final prospectus to investors. Form N-2 
also requires affected funds to provide to new purchasers a copy of all 
previously-filed materials that the fund incorporated by reference into 
the prospectus and/or SAI. We understand that this requirement creates 
particular challenges for BDCs, which generally do not take advantage 
of the backward incorporation permitted by Form N-2. Instead, BDCs 
generally include the required financial and related information in the 
prospectus, which can double or even triple the length of a BDC's 
prospectus. For example, the median page length of prospectuses filed 
by listed BDCs is approximately 234 pages.\349\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \349\ This estimate is based on the most recent Form N-2 filings 
of the 49 listed BDCs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Current Disclosure Obligations of Affected Funds
    Affected funds differ in their periodic and current reporting 
obligations. Like operating companies, BDCs file annual reports with 
audited financials on Form 10-K, quarterly reports with unaudited 
financials on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K. In 2018, all 
49 of the listed BDCs filed form 8-K reports, while only 38 of the 54 
unlisted BDCs filed such reports. Registered CEFs file annual reports 
to shareholders with audited financials and semi-annual reports to 
shareholders with unaudited financials on Form N-CSR. Listed registered 
CEFs are also subject to exchange rules that require listed issuers to 
provide the market current information in response to certain events 
(e.g., dividends announcements through a press release or report on 
Form 8-K). In 2018, there were 75 registered CEFs that furnished or 
filed Form 8-K reports either voluntarily or as a result of current 
disclosure requirements under exchange rules. Of

[[Page 14489]]

these, 65 were listed registered CEFs and 10 were unlisted registered 
CEFs.

B. Potential Benefits Resulting From the Proposed Implementation of the 
Statutory Mandates

    As discussed, the proposed amendments to implement the statutory 
mandates are designed to provide securities offering parity between 
affected funds and operating companies and streamline the registration 
process for BDCs and registered CEFs, consistent with the BDC Act and 
the Registered CEF Act. We believe that the proposed rules would 
achieve this goal and consequently result in significant benefits in a 
number of areas, including by improving access to the public capital 
markets and possibly lowering the cost of capital by, among other 
things, modifying our rules related to affected funds' ability to 
qualify as WKSIs, to use the full shelf registration process, and to 
engage in certain communications during a registered offering.\350\ 
Additionally, as discussed below, we believe that the proposed rules 
would provide benefits to investors as well, including by increasing 
the flow of valuable information that could be available to investors 
to inform their investment decisions. Finally, we believe that the 
proposed rules would provide cost-saving options to affected fund 
issuers and underwriters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \350\ See also infra Part IV.E (discussing benefits associated 
with our discretionary rule amendments).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Improved Access to Capital and Lower Cost of Capital
    We anticipate that the proposed rules would facilitate capital 
formation and possibly lower the cost of capital by improving access to 
the public capital markets for affected funds. The rules are designed 
to reduce regulatory impediments to capital formation and provide more 
flexibility to these funds to conduct registered securities offerings. 
The amount of flexibility accorded by the proposed rules will depend on 
the characteristics of the affected funds, consistent with our rules' 
treatment of similarly-situated operating companies. For example, and 
as explained below, certain affected funds like large listed BDCs and 
large listed registered CEFs are expected to benefit more from the 
proposed rules than unlisted BDCs and unlisted registered CEFs, 
including unlisted interval funds. The proposed rules would provide the 
most flexibility under the communications rules and the automatic shelf 
registration system to eligible WKSIs. Other affected funds, such as 
seasoned affected funds, also would benefit, albeit to a lesser degree, 
from the other revisions to the offering process and our communications 
rules.
    The largest increase in capital formation and reduction in cost of 
capital that the proposed rules could generate would come from allowing 
affected funds to obtain WKSI status. Affected funds that qualify as 
WKSIs would enjoy additional flexibility compared to affected funds 
that are non-WKSIs.\351\ There are 97 affected funds (14 listed BDCs 
and 83 listed registered CEFs) that meet the $700 million public float 
criterion as of June 30, 2018.\352\ A WKSI's registration statement and 
any subsequent amendments are automatically effective upon filing. This 
flexibility would allow affected funds that qualify as WKSIs to 
promptly tap favorable windows of opportunity in the public market, to 
structure terms of securities on a real-time basis to accommodate 
investor demand, and to determine or change the plan of distribution in 
response to changing market conditions. For example, affected funds, 
which typically trade at a discount to their NAV,\353\ that are WKSIs 
would be able to act more quickly to raise capital when their shares 
are trading at a premium,\354\ thus increasing the amount of capital 
raised and enhancing capital formation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \351\ See supra Part II.C.
    \352\ See supra Part IV.A.1.
    \353\ See, e.g., Jonathan B. Berk and Richard Stanton, 
Managerial Ability, Compensation, and the Closed-End Fund Discount, 
Journal of Finance, Vol. 62, 529-556 (2007); Jeffrey Pontiff, Costly 
Arbitrage: Evidence from Closed-End Funds, Quarterly Journal of 
Economics, Vol. 111, 1135-1151 (1996); Charles M.C. Lee, Andrei 
Shleifer, and Richard H. Thaler, Investor Sentiment and the Closed-
End Fund Puzzle, Journal of Finance, Vol. 46, 76-110 (1991).
    \354\ See supra footnote 27 (discussing restrictions on affected 
funds' ability to sell their shares at a price below NAV).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, WKSIs are not required to pay any registration fees 
at the time of the filing of the registration statement. They are only 
required to pay the SEC filing fee at the time securities are taken 
down and sold off the shelf. This would provide additional flexibility 
to qualifying affected funds in that they need only incur such filing 
fees if and when they decide to proceed with an offering. The proposed 
rules may also lower the cost of capital because they would provide 
significant flexibility to affected funds that are WKSIs and their 
underwriters in marketing securities. The proposed communications rules 
would allow these funds to communicate at any time regarding an 
offering.
    Given the important benefits that the WKSI status creates, and the 
fact that currently only few affected funds would qualify as WKSIs, it 
is possible that advisers to some affected funds may try, through 
various means, including raising additional capital and mergers and 
acquisitions, to increase their funds' public float to the WKSI 
threshold. Thus, possible effects of the rule may include increased 
fund size and consolidation of affected funds. Such developments may 
increase efficiency by allowing the larger resulting funds to benefit 
from improved access and lower cost of capital. We also recognize that 
consolidation may be driven by other factors as well, in combination 
with the effects of the rule, and typically would be subject to certain 
approvals by a fund's board of directors or shareholders.\355\ 
Potential consolidation and increases in fund size could also reduce 
costs to investors by, for example, allowing an affected fund to 
realize greater efficiencies and reduce its total operating expenses 
over time. However, consolidation also could negatively affect the 
number of investment opportunities available to investors if it leads 
to a reduction of the number of strategies funds employ. While barriers 
to entry in the affected fund industry are relatively low, and it is 
possible that new funds will enter the market thereby increasing 
competition and investment opportunities, potential consolidation of 
affected funds could make it more difficult for new or smaller funds to 
compete since funds with larger amounts of assets may have better 
access to certain investment opportunities or may be able to offer 
lower costs to investors. At present, we are not able to estimate the 
effects of these competitive dynamics.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \355\ See, e.g., rule 17a-8 under the Investment Company Act [17 
CFR 270.17a-8].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Other provisions of the proposed rules could also enhance capital 
formation and lower the cost of offerings for affected funds that 
qualify as seasoned funds and file a short-form registration statement 
on Form N-2.\356\ For example, the proposed rules would generally allow 
these funds to more efficiently use the shelf registration process if, 
like operating companies, they meet the eligibility requirements of 
Form S-3.\357\ As of June 30, 2018, there were 501 affected funds that 
met the $75 million dollar public float criterion for primary offerings 
under Form S-3 (which criterion would be incorporated

[[Page 14490]]

into the short-form registration instruction of Form N-2).\358\ 
Affected funds that qualify would bear fewer costs associated with 
updating the information in their registration statements because 
information in the fund's Exchange Act reports would be incorporated by 
reference into the fund's registration statement. For example, we 
estimate that eligible affected funds would file approximately 112 
fewer post-effective amendments annually as a result of the proposal, 
which would result in an annual aggregate cost reduction of 
approximately $7,943,376 for these funds.\359\ Additionally, we 
understand that currently BDCs often file prospectus supplements close-
in-time to filing their current and periodic Exchange Act reports to 
make sure the BDC's prospectus disclosure provides the same information 
as that disclosed in its Exchange Act reports. Under the proposed 
rules, eligible BDCs would no longer file these prospectus supplements 
since their Exchange Act reports would be incorporated by reference 
into their registration statements. As a result, an eligible BDC may, 
on average, file approximately 14 fewer prospectus supplements on an 
annual basis under the proposed rules.\360\ We anticipate that eligible 
registered CEFs also would be able to make fewer prospectus supplement 
filings under the proposed rules, although they likely would not 
experience as large of a reduction in filings since, among other 
things, they file periodic reports on a semi-annual basis (rather than 
quarterly) and generally are not required to report on Form 8-K at 
present. While we believe that affected funds would likely file fewer 
prospectus supplements under the proposed amendments, we are unable to 
estimate any reduction in the number of prospectus supplements that 
affected funds would file under the proposal, and any associated cost 
savings for affected funds, due to certain counterbalancing factors. 
For example, if the proposal causes affected funds to increase their 
capital-raising activities, they may need to update their prospectuses 
more often and may file more prospectus supplements as a result. 
However, if affected funds begin to use their Exchange Act reports to 
update their prospectuses, as permitted under the proposed amendments 
and as we believe they might,\361\ they may file fewer prospectus 
supplements. On average, we believe that affected funds would likely 
file fewer prospectus supplements under the proposed amendments since 
they would be able to update their prospectus more efficiently by 
forward incorporating their Exchange Act reports, although an affected 
fund that greatly increases its capital-raising activities may not 
experience the same reduction in filing burdens.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \356\ See supra Part II.B.
    \357\ The short-form registration instruction refers to the 
eligibility criteria in Form S-3, with additional references to 
reporting requirements under the Investment Company Act.
    \358\ See supra Part IV.A.1.
    \359\ For purposes of the PRA, we estimate that this would 
decrease the aggregate annual burden of Form N-2 by 11,984 hours and 
would result in a reduction in the cost burden for Form N-2 by 
$3,149,776. See infra footnote 448. We monetize the internal burden 
of preparing post-effective amendments by multiplying the burden 
hours by an estimated wage rate of $400 per hour (11,984 x $400 = 
$4,793,600). The estimated wage figure is based on analysis in 
previous rulemakings. The total annual cost is calculated by adding 
the monetized internal burden ($4,793,600) to the cost of outside 
professionals ($3,149,776).
    \360\ This analysis assumes that a BDC would file a prospectus 
supplement for each Form 10-Q filing (3 filings per year), Form 10-K 
filing (1 filing per year), and Form 8-K filing (estimated to be 10 
filings per year), for a total of 14 periodic and current reports 
per year. See infra footnote 415 and associated text.
    \361\ See supra Parts II.B.2.c and II.H.2.a.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In general, we believe affected funds that qualify for the short-
form registration instruction would experience cost savings associated 
with making fewer filings and would be able to use a more efficient 
process to update their prospectus disclosure. This would decrease the 
costs of eligible funds' registered offerings and would also allow them 
to act more quickly to take advantage of favorable market conditions 
(e.g., when trading at a premium). Certain seasoned funds registering 
securities in shelf offerings also would be able to omit certain 
information from their base prospectuses and use the same process as 
operating companies to provide omitted information by filing a 
prospectus supplement, which would generally make the shelf 
registration process less costly for these funds as compared to the 
baseline.
    The proposed rule also may provide incremental cost savings to 
affected funds that are eligible to file a short-form registration 
statement in certain other respects. For example, the proposed rule 
would reduce the costs of these funds seeking shareholder approval for 
proposals to authorize, issue, modify, or exchange securities by 
allowing them to incorporate by reference certain materials rather than 
delivering these materials to security holders with the proxy 
statement.\362\ We do not anticipate that these cost savings would be 
substantial, however, as we understand that affected funds do not often 
make these types of proposals to security holders. Affected funds that 
are eligible to file a short-form registration statement also could 
experience modest cost savings from the proposed amendment to rule 418 
since they would no longer be required by that rule to furnish certain 
information to the Commission or its staff promptly on request.\363\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \362\ See supra Part II.F.2.
    \363\ See supra Part II.F.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rules would generate other benefits for affected funds 
generally, regardless of whether they are WKSIs or seasoned funds. For 
example, the proposal to require affected funds to follow the same 
process that operating companies follow to file prospectuses in rule 
424 would require that affected funds file prospectus supplements only 
if substantive changes from or additions to a previously filed 
prospectus are made, whereas currently they are required to file every 
prospectus that varies from any previously filed prospectus under rule 
497.\364\ Rule 424 also is designed to work together with rule 
415(a)(1)(x), and provides additional time for an issuer to file a 
prospectus. This proposed change could modestly reduce filing burdens 
and should facilitate eligible funds using the shelf registration 
process efficiently and in parity with operating companies. Also, the 
proposed rules would allow an affected fund to satisfy its obligation 
to deliver a final prospectus by filing it with the Commission, thus 
decreasing the cost of the offering.\365\ For example, the proposed 
rules would permit affected funds to save on printing and mailing costs 
for delivering the final prospectus in paper.\366\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \364\ See supra Part II.B.2.b.
    \365\ See supra Part II.D.
    \366\ Because a fund is not required to report the extent to 
which it relies on Commission guidance, we lack information to 
estimate the percentage of funds that solely or predominantly rely 
on electronic delivery under existing Commission guidance. See, 
e.g., Use of Electronic Media for Delivery Purposes, Investment 
Company Act Release No. 21399 (Oct. 6, 1995) [60 FR 53458 (Oct. 13, 
1995)]. Affected funds that rely to a greater extent on electronic 
delivery of final prospectuses under existing Commission guidance 
may realize smaller net cost savings under the proposed rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The lower costs of registered offerings resulting from the proposed 
rules would be beneficial to investors in affected funds because funds 
bear offering expenses. Lowering offering expenses may, all else equal, 
reduce the size of the discount or increase the size of the premium at 
which shares of the affected funds trade. In addition, the proposed 
rules could reduce the cost to underwriters of participating in 
registered offerings of affected funds, and these potential cost 
savings could be passed on to the affected funds. Based on the sheer 
volume and number

[[Page 14491]]

of transactions,\367\ underwriters may have more expertise and 
established procedures for the registered offerings of operating 
companies, which are subject to the rules we propose to extend to 
affected funds. In contrast, underwriters probably have less, or more 
concentrated, expertise regarding the requirements for offerings by 
affected funds. Standardization in the registered offering space, by 
making the offerings of affected funds more similar to those of 
operating companies, could make it easier for underwriters to execute 
such offerings and may decrease their compliance costs. If underwriters 
pass some of the cost savings on to affected funds and their investors, 
this could result in cheaper registered offerings for affected funds, 
thus encouraging them to raise more capital, which would lead to 
enhanced capital formation. Lastly, standardization may encourage a 
broader set of underwriters to participate in this market, potentially 
decreasing costs for affected funds and investors in these funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \367\ For example, in 2017 non-fund issuers raised approximately 
$1.3 trillion in 1,846 registered debt offerings and $184 billion in 
976 registered equity offerings. See Capital Raising in the U.S.: An 
Analysis of the Market for Unregistered Securities Offerings, 2009-
2017, Division of Economic and Risk Analysis White Paper (Aug. 1, 
2018), available at https://www.sec.gov/dera/staff-papers/white-papers/dera_white_paper_regulation_d_082018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rules could level the securities offering playing 
field between affected funds and operating companies and streamline the 
registration process for affected funds, consequently making them 
potentially more competitive in the market for capital raising. The 
proposed rules may also make certain affected funds more competitive 
compared to affected funds that either cannot or choose not to rely on 
these rules. Thus, the proposed rules would likely enhance competition 
in the public capital markets. The increased competition for capital in 
turn could lead to potentially better allocation of capital in the 
market. The proposed rules may also benefit companies in which affected 
funds invest. Small and mid-size companies, because of their size, type 
of assets, risk profile, and the general lack of information about 
their activities and financial condition, typically find it more 
difficult to raise funds from traditional sources of capital such as 
bank loans and registered offerings.\368\ This difficulty in sourcing 
more traditional financing constrains their ability to invest in 
profitable projects and grow. To the extent that the proposed rules 
improve capital raising opportunities for BDCs and registered CEFs that 
invest in these companies, this may result in investments in a greater 
number of small to mid-size U.S. companies, thus alleviating financial 
constraints of such companies and contributing to economic growth 
generally.\369\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \368\ See, e.g., Alan Berger and Gregory Udell, The Economics of 
Small Business Finance: The Roles of Private Equity and Debt Markets 
in the Financial Growth Cycle, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 
22, 613-673 (1998); Meghana Ayyagari, Asli Demirg[uuml][ccedil]-
Kunt, and Vojislav Maksimovic, How Important are Financing 
Constraints? The Role of Finance in the Business Environment, World 
Bank Mimeo (2005); Crowdfunding, Securities Act Release No. 9974 
(Oct. 30, 2015) [80 FR 71388 (Nov. 16, 2015)].
    \369\ See, e.g., Torsten Beck, Asli Demirg[uuml][ccedil]-Kunt, 
and Ross Levine, SMEs, Growth, and Poverty: Cross-Country Evidence, 
Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 10, 197-227 (2005);Ryan Decker, 
John Haltiwanger, Ron Jarmin, and Javier Miranda, The Role of 
Entrepreneurship in U.S. Job Creation and Economic Dynamism, Journal 
of Economic Perspectives, July, 3-24 (2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Facilitated Communication With Investors
    The proposed rules would provide incremental flexibility to funds 
in their communications, which may increase the flow of information to 
investors.\370\ Currently, affected funds are unable to communicate 
about an offering before a registration statement is filed, and their 
post-filing communications are subject to prospectus liability under 
section 12 of the Securities Act (or must be accompanied or preceded by 
the statutory prospectus).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \370\ See supra Part II.E.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This standardization in the communications processes of affected 
funds, by making them similar to those of operating companies, would 
make it easier for underwriters to execute offerings by affected funds 
and thus may decrease their compliance costs, which in turn may lead to 
lower offering costs and potentially enhance capital formation. 
Additionally, under the proposal, affected funds that would qualify as 
WKSIs would be permitted to engage in the widest range of 
communications, including free writing prospectuses about an offering 
before a registration statement is filed. More generally, affected 
funds would be able to engage in certain other pre-filing 
communications, use free writing prospectuses after a registration 
statement is filed, and use certain communications that are not subject 
to prospectus liability. The proposed changes in the communications 
rules for affected funds may increase the amount of valuable 
information that could be provided to investors before they make 
investment decisions, particularly with respect to WKSIs. We believe 
that more information could be provided on a timelier basis because the 
rules would eliminate regulatory barriers to the dissemination of that 
information, and the markets may provide incentives for issuers, 
underwriters, and broker-dealers to produce additional information. We 
also believe that the increased flexibility of affected funds in their 
communications with investors under the free writing prospectus rules 
would maintain appropriate investor protection, consistent with the 
protections that apply to affected funds' communications under rule 
482. For example, the proposed rules that allow affected funds to use 
free writing prospectuses are designed to assure that written issuer-
provided or issuer-used information is publicly available. 
Additionally, the free writing prospectus will be a section 10(b) 
prospectus under the Securities Act and, as such, will be subject to 
liability under section 12(a)(2) as well as the anti-fraud provisions 
of the federal securities laws.
    Increased information flow can help promote efficient capital 
markets because the market may be able to value securities more 
accurately. For example, the proposed rules would permit broker-dealers 
to disseminate research about an affected fund if certain conditions 
are met. While broker-dealers currently may disseminate such research 
under rule 482, the proposed amendments to rule 138 would likely reduce 
certain costs to broker-dealers associated with rule 482 (e.g., filing 
costs and concerns associated with prospectus liability). This could 
allow more valuable information about affected funds to reach potential 
investors. Another benefit of increasing the information flow is that 
investors may become better informed in making portfolio allocation 
decisions in accordance with their particular risk-return profiles. In 
addition, the proposed rules may benefit broker-dealers who provide 
research reports on affected funds by reducing their potential 
liability exposure associated with such reports, relative to the 
baseline, which may encourage them to provide additional research and 
enhance information flow.

C. Potential Costs Resulting From the Proposed Implementation of the 
Statutory Mandates

1. Compliance Costs
    We expect the rules we are proposing to implement the statutory 
mandate could increase compliance costs for affected funds in certain 
respects.\371\ We

[[Page 14492]]

are also cognizant of the fact that such an increase could be passed on 
to funds' investors. A potential cost of the proposed rules is that 
affected funds could incur increased filing or recordkeeping costs 
associated with issuer free writing prospectuses,\372\ although 
affected funds currently face many of the same filing and recordkeeping 
costs under rule 482. For example, the ability of affected funds that 
qualify as WKSIs to use free writing prospectuses may increase the 
level of these funds' current communications (including communications 
prior to filing a registration statement that are presently 
prohibited), thus increasing the funds' filing and recordkeeping costs. 
We estimate that affected funds that are WKSIs would have additional 
annual filing and recordkeeping costs of $200 per affected fund for 
free writing prospectuses used before the fund files a registration 
statement.\373\ To the extent affected funds use free writing 
prospectuses for communications that currently occur under rule 482, 
the costs associated with free writing prospectuses could increase, and 
the costs associated with rule 482 advertisements could decrease. We 
are unable to predict, however, whether affected funds would be more 
likely to use free writing prospectuses than rule 482 communications or 
to engage in more communications with investors in practice as a result 
of the proposed rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \371\ See also infra Part IV.E (discussing compliance and other 
costs associated with the proposed discretionary amendments).
    \372\ See supra Part II.E.1; infra Part V.B.4 (estimating the 
annual paperwork burden for free writing prospectuses under rules 
163 and 433 for purposes of the PRA).
    \373\ For purposes of the PRA, we estimate that, on average, 
affected funds that are eligible to be WKSIs (estimated as 104 
funds) would file two free writing prospectuses under the proposed 
amendments to rule 163 each year. We estimate the total incremental 
burden would be approximately 0.125 hours and $150 for the service 
of outside professionals. See infra Part V.B.4. We monetize the 
internal burden of preparing and filing a free writing prospectus by 
multiplying the burden hours by an estimated wage rate of $400 per 
hour (0.125 x $400 = $50). The estimated wage figure is based on 
analysis in previous rulemakings. The total annual cost is 
calculated by adding the monetized internal burden ($50) to the cost 
of outside professionals ($150).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Affected funds could also incur costs associated with adjusting 
their internal procedures for filing prospectus supplements.\374\ Such 
costs could stem from the need to augment funds' information technology 
systems or train funds' employees, although, as recognized above, 
affected funds likely would be able to file fewer prospectus 
supplements under the proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \374\ See supra Part II.B.2.b.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Parties that would be required to provide notices under rule 
173,\375\ including underwriters and dealers in certain circumstances, 
may incur additional costs due to the requirement to notify affected 
fund investors that they have purchased shares in a registered 
offering. In addition, these same parties would incur costs to 
establish procedures for receiving and complying with requests for 
final prospectuses. We believe that providing the notice to investors 
would not impose a significant incremental cost because the notice can 
consist of a pre-printed message that is automatically delivered with 
or as part of the confirmation required by Exchange Act rule 10b-
10.\376\ Accordingly, we estimate that the cost of complying with rule 
173 would be approximately $0.05 per notice.\377\ We estimate the 
annual cost of providing the notification would be approximately 
$1,757,081.\378\ For the parties that are required to provide such 
notices, these additional costs of complying with rule 173 would be 
mitigated to a certain degree by the proposed elimination of the 
requirement to supply a final prospectus to each investor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \375\ See supra Part II.D.
    \376\ See rule 10b-10 under the Exchange Act [17 CFR 240.10b-
10].
    \377\ The Commission has estimated the cost per rule 173 notice 
to be $0.05 for operating companies. See Securities Offering Reform 
Adopting Release, supra footnote 5, at 44795. We assume the same 
cost will apply to rule 173 notices provided to affected fund 
investors.
    \378\ For the purpose of the PRA, we estimate that there would 
be 43,546 notices per year per affected fund. The annual cost of 
providing rule 173 notification is calculated as the number of 
affected funds (807) x the number of notices per year (43,546) x the 
cost per notice ($0.05). See infra Part V.B.5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Other Costs
    Under the proposed rules, affected funds that qualify as WKSIs 
would be able to file registration statements and post-effective 
amendments that become automatically effective. To the extent that 
investors previously benefited from the Commission staff's review of 
these filings before they become effective, allowing filings of 
affected funds that are WKSIs to become automatically effective may 
eliminate such reviews and, as a result, possibly increase the costs to 
investors. Allowing affected funds that file short-form registration 
statements on Form N-2 to forward incorporate by reference could have a 
similar potential impact on investors. However, issuers would still 
face liability under the federal securities laws for registration 
statement disclosures (e.g., sections 12 and 17 of the Securities Act 
and section 10(b) and rule 10b-5 under the Exchange Act), which may 
ameliorate the potential costs associated with reduced staff 
review.\379\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \379\ Certain of our discretionary amendments may also 
ameliorate these costs. See infra Part IV.E.3 (discussing the 
benefits and costs of the proposed requirement to disclose material 
staff comments) and Part IV.E.2 (discussing the benefits and costs 
of the proposed structured data requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    More generally, allowing forward incorporation by reference under 
the short-form registration instruction could increase the analytical 
burden and search costs for potential investors. Currently, affected 
funds provide required information in the prospectus that is delivered 
to investors, and forward incorporation by reference is not allowed. 
Under the proposal, instead of having all the information available in 
one location, investors may need to separately access on a website or 
request the incorporated materials. As a result, costs to investors for 
assembling and assimilating necessary information could increase, with 
a potentially stronger effect for retail investors (e.g., because they 
generally may not have the technical capabilities or monetary resources 
to efficiently search through a multitude of information sources). We 
do not have data to assess if, and to what extent, this proposed 
revision would be burdensome to investors.
    However, an affected fund making a shelf offering under rule 
415(a)(1)(x) is required to file a new registration statement every 
three years, which provides investors with a periodic update of 
consolidated information.\380\ We are also proposing to require that 
affected funds provide in their annual reports certain information 
currently disclosed in their prospectuses to make the information more 
readily available in one document for investors.\381\ Further, 
Securities Act Forms S-3 and F-3 have long permitted incorporation by 
reference from the issuer's Exchange Act reports, and investors have 
not indicated they are unduly burdened when investing in offerings 
registered on these Forms.\382\ Studies have shown, however, that the 
majority of investors in operating companies are institutional 
investors, whereas the majority of investors in the securities of 
affected funds are retail investors, who may face relatively higher 
costs associated with searching for information distributed across 
multiple documents.\383\ In

[[Page 14493]]

addition, the requirement to backward and forward incorporate by 
reference certain information into a short-form registration statement 
could increase an affected fund's liability with respect to information 
that has not previously been incorporated into its registration 
statement because this information would now be part of the 
registration statement. This could increase costs for relevant funds, 
including potential legal costs (e.g., those associated with additional 
review of materials that would be incorporated by reference into the 
fund's registration statement or counsel and other costs in connection 
with potential legal actions). These potential cost increases due to 
the proposed rules could be passed on to investors of affected funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \380\ See supra footnote 19.
    \381\ See supra Part II.H.2.a.
    \382\ See Securities Offering Reform Adopting Release, supra 
footnote 5, at 44796.
    \383\ The average institutional holding is estimated to be 
approximately 30% for BDCs and 21% for registered CEFs. See CIFRR 
Adopting Release, supra footnote 98, at 64199. The institutional 
ownership of U.S. public equities was approximately 67% as of 2010. 
See Marshall E. Blume and Donald B. Keim, Working Paper, 
Institutional Investors and Stock Market Liquidity: Trends and 
Relationships, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania (Aug. 
21, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rules would allow an affected fund to not deliver 
final prospectuses to investors if the fund files the final prospectus 
with the Commission. We acknowledge, however, that while this procedure 
has become commonplace in many aspects of our capital markets, there 
may be some investors who would prefer to receive the prospectus 
directly. While an investor could request a copy of the final 
prospectus under rule 173, there would be burdens on an investor to 
make such a request (e.g., loss of time while making the request and a 
delay in receiving the prospectus). Thus, investors without home 
internet access, depending on their ability and preference to access 
fund information electronically, might experience a reduction in their 
ability to access a fund's final prospectus. To the extent that a 
reduction in this information by such investors decreases how informed 
they are about affected funds, it could potentially decrease their 
ability to efficiently allocate capital across affected funds and other 
investments. However, an investor's purchase commitment and the 
resulting contract of sale of securities to the investor in the 
offering generally occur before the final prospectus is required to be 
delivered under the Securities Act, and this is commonplace in other 
parts of our capital markets. Moreover, for sales occurring in the 
secondary market, as a result of our existing rules, investors in 
securities of reporting issuers generally are not delivered a final 
prospectus.\384\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \384\ See Securities Offering Reform Adopting Release, supra 
footnote 5, at 44782.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

D. Alternatives to Proposed Approach To Implementing Statutory Mandates

    We considered certain alternative approaches to implementing the 
directives in the BDC Act and Registered CEF Act to allow affected 
funds to use the securities offering rules that are available to 
operating companies. Although the BDC Act identifies certain required 
amendments to our rules and forms, we could have, for example, made 
additional modifications to the relevant provisions for affected funds 
or further revised the current registration and offering framework 
affected funds use.
    For example, as discussed above, we considered modifying the public 
float standards in the WKSI definition or the short-form registration 
instruction by changing the required level of public float or providing 
alternative eligibility criteria, such as net asset value of a certain 
size for funds whose shares are not traded on an exchange.\385\ These 
alternatives could have allowed more affected funds to qualify as WKSIs 
or to file short-form registration statements, with the associated 
benefits (e.g., lower costs of registered offerings) and costs (e.g., 
potential higher incidence of disclosures and fund practices that may 
not comply with applicable law due to reduced staff review) discussed 
above. For example, most interval funds do not list their securities on 
an exchange and do not have ``public float,'' and these alternatives 
therefore could have permitted these interval funds, as well as other 
unlisted affected funds, to qualify as WKSIs or file short-form 
registration statements. However, modifying the eligibility criteria in 
the WKSI definition or the short-form registration instruction could 
give affected funds that do not have the requisite public float under 
the current WKSI definition or Form S-3 eligibility requirements an 
advantage over operating companies. Further, we do not believe that 
affected funds would be likely to have a level of market following at 
lower levels of public float than operating companies that would 
justify a lower public float threshold or alternative metric to qualify 
as a WKSI or to use a short-form registration statement. In addition, 
certain of the benefits that flow from WKSI status or the ability to 
use a short-form registration statement may be less relevant to 
unlisted affected funds that are engaged in continuous offerings.\386\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \385\ See supra Part II.C.
    \386\ See supra paragraph accompanying footnotes 34-37.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under the BDC Act and the Registered CEF Act, we could have 
extended the proposed rules only to BDCs, listed registered CEFs, and 
interval funds. Under this approach, unlisted registered CEFs would not 
have been able to take advantage of certain benefits of the proposed 
rules that would otherwise be available to unlisted BDCs, such as the 
cost-savings associated with the final prospectus delivery 
reforms.\387\ This alternative also could have saved unlisted 
registered CEFs certain compliance costs stemming from the proposed 
rulemaking, such as the requirement to report on Form 8-K. However, 
excluding unlisted registered CEFs from the proposed rules could create 
unnecessary competitive disparities between unlisted registered CEFs 
and unlisted BDCs and would not provide investors in unlisted 
registered CEFs with the benefits of the new investor protections we 
are proposing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \387\ As previously recognized, unlisted registered CEFs would 
not be eligible for certain of the proposed amendments. See supra 
Part II.A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

E. Discussion of Discretionary Choices

    We discuss below the discretionary amendments that we are 
proposing, in light of the proposed changes to implement the BDC Act 
and Registered CEF Act and the associated benefits and costs of those 
choices. We have tried to quantify the impact of each of the proposals, 
but in many cases, reliable, empirical evidence about the effects is 
not readily available to the Commission. We do, however, request that 
commenters provide us with any empirical evidence relating to these 
various choices to the extent that they can.
1. New Registration Fee Payment Method for Interval Funds
    We are proposing a modernized approach to registration fee payment 
for interval funds that would require them to pay securities 
registration fees using the same method that mutual funds and ETFs use 
today. Specifically, the proposal would require interval funds to pay 
their registration fees on a net basis once a year, rather than having 
to pay registration fees when the fund files its registration 
statement.\388\ We believe this approach would make the registration 
fee payment process for interval funds more efficient. For example, it 
would avoid the possibility that an interval fund would inadvertently 
sell more shares than it had registered and would not require the 
interval fund to periodically register new shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \388\ See supra Part II.G.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We believe the proposal could also benefit interval funds by 
reducing their

[[Page 14494]]

initial registration fees. In the table below, we have attempted to 
quantify the potential initial cost-savings for interval funds under 
the proposed modernized approach to registration fee payment over a 3-
year period.\389\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \389\ The estimates are based on data collected for interval 
funds that were active as of June 30, 2018. We used their Form N-2 
filings and Form N-CSR filings to identify current registration 
fees, proceeds from shares issued, and cost of shares redeemed.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Average
                                                        registration fee
                                     Current average    that would have
                                     registration fee   been paid under
                                        (paid upon        the proposal
                                      filing) \390\     (paid at the end
                                                         of the fiscal
                                                          year) \391\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year 1............................            $31,501             $7,821
Year 2............................  .................              6,550
Year 3............................  .................             20,957
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Within the current regime, an interval fund would pay on average 
$31,501 at the time of filing, and then issue and repurchase securities 
over time. Under the proposed regime, the fund would pay its 
registration fees on a net basis once a year. Since the proposed rule 
would allow interval funds to shift more of the fee payments to the 
future, it would decrease their cost of offering securities. An 
interval fund would, however, be required to annually file Form 24F-
2.\392\ We estimate the annual burden of filing Form 24F-2 for interval 
funds would be $134 per fund.\393\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \390\ The current average registration fee paid in year 1 is the 
average of the actual fees reported by the interval funds in the 
Calculation of Registration Fee table in Form N-2. For purposes of 
this analysis, we assume that interval funds did not register 
additional securities in years 2 or 3. If they did, the average 
registration fees under the current framework would be higher than 
$31,501.
    \391\ For each of the interval funds, the fees in years 1, 2, 
and 3 are estimated as [(dollar proceeds from shares issued + dollar 
cost of shares redeemed)/$1,000,000] x $121.20. The $121.20 is the 
fee rate (per million dollars) that funds pay to register shares for 
fiscal year 2019. Then we calculate the average fees per year.
    \392\ As discussed below, interval funds and other funds that 
file on Form 24F-2 would be required to file the form in a 
structured XML format under the proposed rules.
    \393\ For PRA purposes, we estimate an annual burden per 
respondent of filing Form 24F-2 of two hours. See infra Part V.B.7. 
At an estimated wage rate of $67 per hour, the annual dollar cost 
for filing Form 24F-2 is $132 (2 hours x $67 per hour). This 
estimate does not account for burdens associated with filing Form 
24F-2 in a structured XML format, which are discussed infra in Part 
IV.E.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As an alternative, we considered proposing to allow a wider range 
of affected funds, such as registered CEFs that are tender offer funds, 
to rely on rule 24f-2. This approach would have extended the benefits 
of rule 24f-2 to additional affected funds. However, as discussed 
above, interval funds have structural similarities to mutual funds and 
ETFs that other affected funds do not. In particular, interval funds 
routinely repurchase shares at net asset value and are required to 
periodically offer to repurchase their shares, and therefore are more 
likely to realize the operational benefits of computing registration 
fees on a net annual basis than are funds that are not required to 
periodically offer to repurchase their shares at net asset value.
2. Structured Data Requirements
    The proposed rules include new structured data reporting 
requirements for affected funds. Under the proposal, all affected funds 
would be required to tag in Inline XBRL format certain Form N-2 
prospectus disclosure items. All affected funds also would be required 
to tag the information on the cover page of Form N-2 using Inline XBRL 
in accordance with the EDGAR Filer Manual. Finally, BDCs would be 
required to tag financial statement information using Inline XBRL.
    Under the proposal, affected funds would be required to tag the 
following Form N-2 prospectus disclosure items using Inline XBRL: Fee 
Table; Senior Securities Table; Investment Objectives and Policies; 
Risk Factors; Share Price Data; and Capital Stock, Long-Term Debt, and 
Other Securities.\394\ These items provide important information about 
an affected fund's key features, costs, and risks and may be 
particularly useful to investors to inform their investment decisions. 
With respect to the proposal to require BDCs to tag financial statement 
information, unlike operating companies and registered investment 
companies, BDCs currently are not required to report any structured 
data.\395\ This proposed requirement would extend to BDCs a requirement 
that currently applies to operating companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \394\ See supra Part II.H.1.c.
    \395\ See supra Part II.H.1.a.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Requiring BDCs to tag financial statement information using Inline 
XBRL, and all affected funds to tag in Inline XBRL format certain 
important prospectus disclosure items, would provide important benefits 
to investors seeking to access information about affected funds, 
whether directly or through third-party information providers. By 
providing a standardized, interactive, computer-based framework for 
reporting, it could further facilitate more efficient comparisons of 
important information across affected funds by making it easier to 
aggregate and analyze information through automated means, which could 
increase competition for investor capital. The proposed Inline XBRL 
tagging requirements may also potentially increase the efficiency of 
capital formation to the extent that making disclosures available in a 
structured format reduces some of the information barriers facing 
prospective investors and makes it easier for affected funds to attract 
investors. Smaller affected funds in particular may benefit more from 
enhanced exposure to investors. If reporting the disclosures in a 
structured format increases the availability, or reduces the cost of 
collecting and analyzing, key information about affected funds, smaller 
affected funds may benefit from improved coverage by third-party 
information providers and data aggregators. Further, requiring affected 
funds to tag certain prospectus disclosures using Inline XBRL would 
facilitate monitoring of these funds by staff and market participants 
more generally, which could, for example, increase investor protection 
by enhancing staff's ability to monitor for regulatory compliance. This 
could mitigate potential costs associated with other aspects of the 
proposal, such as automatic shelf registration statements for WKSIs and 
short-form registration statements for eligible funds, that could 
affect investor protection.\396\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \396\ See supra Part IV.C.2 (discussing these costs).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed cover page tagging requirement would include new

[[Page 14495]]

checkboxes that would help identify whether a registration statement 
is, for example, an automatic shelf registration statement or a short-
form registration statement.\397\ We already require registrants to tag 
all of the information on the cover page of Form 10-K, Form 10-Q, Form 
8-K, Form 20-F, and Form 40-F using Inline XBRL in accordance with the 
EDGAR Filer Manual. The proposed requirement to tag the Form N-2 cover 
page in Inline XBRL is expected to benefit investors, the Commission, 
and other data users. Investors would be able to automate their use of 
the cover page information, including company name, the Act or Acts to 
which the registration statement relates, and checkboxes relating to 
the effectiveness of the registration statement. This would enhance 
investors' ability to identify, count, sort, and analyze registrants 
and disclosures to the extent these data points otherwise would be 
formatted, for example, in HTML. The proposed checkboxes, which would 
be required to be tagged in Inline XBRL format, would allow investors, 
Commission staff, and other data users to distinguish between different 
categories of registration statements in much the same way they are 
currently able to do for operating companies. The availability of 
information in Inline XBRL could enable data users to capture and 
analyze cover page information more quickly and at a lower cost, as 
well as to search and analyze the information dynamically. It could 
also facilitate comparison of information across filers and reporting 
periods.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \397\ See supra Part II.H.1.b.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Affected funds would incur some costs to tag and review the 
required information in Inline XBRL. Some filers may perform the 
tagging in-house while others may retain outside service providers. We 
expect the outside service providers to pass along their costs to 
filers. Various XBRL preparation solutions have been developed and used 
by operating companies and open-end fund filers, and some evidence 
suggests that, for operating companies, XBRL tagging costs have 
decreased over time.\398\ Inline XBRL is a specification of XBRL that 
allows filers to embed XBRL data directly into an HTML document, 
eliminating the need to tag a copy of the information in a separate 
XBRL exhibit,\399\ which can make XBRL preparation more efficient and 
less costly. Costs of Inline XBRL preparation may depend on the 
familiarity of the filer and/or its service provider with Inline XBRL. 
Incremental costs of compliance with the proposed tagging requirement 
would be lower for affected funds whose advisers already are required 
to report information for other investment products they offer, such as 
open-end funds, in XBRL. Additionally, in a separate rulemaking, we 
have required BDCs to tag the cover pages of their 10-K, 10-Q, and 8-K 
filings.\400\ Complying with those amendments would result in BDCs 
having the ability to also tag the information on the cover page of 
Form N-2, and at reduced incremental cost. Nevertheless, we recognize 
that some registrants affected by the proposed requirement, 
particularly filers with no Inline XBRL experience, likely would incur 
initial costs to acquire the necessary expertise and/or software as 
well as ongoing costs of tagging required information in Inline XBRL, 
and the incremental effect of any initial fixed costs of complying with 
the Inline XBRL requirement may be greater for smaller affected funds. 
On an ongoing basis, registrants are expected to expend time to tag and 
review the tagged information in Inline XBRL using their in-house 
staff. Some registrants may also incur an initial cost to license 
filing preparation software with Inline XBRL capabilities from a 
software vendor, and some may also incur an ongoing licensing cost. 
Other registrants may incur an initial cost to modify their existing 
filing preparation software to accommodate Inline XBRL preparation. 
Some registrants would incur the costs of filing agent services to rely 
on a filing agent to prepare their Inline XBRL filings. Initial costs 
involving investments in expertise and modifications to disclosure 
preparation solutions, or switching to a different software vendor or 
outside service provider, may result in a higher compliance cost during 
the first year of using Inline XBRL than in subsequent years. We 
recognize that some ongoing fixed costs of complying with the Inline 
XBRL requirement may be greater for smaller affected funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \398\ See, e.g., AICPA sees 45% drop in XBRL costs for small 
companies, Aug. 15, 2018, Accounting Today (stating that, according 
to an updated survey by AICPA and XBRL US, the cost of formatting 
financial statements in XBRL for smaller reporting companies has 
declined 45% since 2014 and that 68.6% of the companies paid $5,500 
or less on an annual basis (as compared to 29.9% of companies in the 
2014 survey) for fully outsourced creation and filing solutions for 
their XBRL filings, while 11.8% of the companies surveyed paid 
annual costs between $5,500 to as much as $8,000 for their full-
service outsourced solutions).
    \399\ Inline XBRL Adopting Release, supra footnote 166, at 
40851.
    \400\ See supra footnote 177.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The costs of compliance with the proposed Inline XBRL requirements 
are likely to vary across registrants. On average we estimate that the 
compliance cost to BDCs of tagging financial statement information, 
certain prospectus disclosure items, and Form N-2 cover page 
information using Inline XBRL would be approximately $152,324 per BDC 
per year in the 3 years following the adoption of the proposed 
rules.\401\ We estimate that the compliance cost to registered CEFs of 
tagging in Inline XBRL format certain prospectus disclosure items and 
tagging Form N-2 cover page information would be approximately $7,191 
per registered CEF per year in the 3 years following the adoption of 
the proposed rules.\402\ We note that some recent surveys based on 
operating companies suggest that these current PRA-based burden 
estimates may be overstated with respect to operating companies, and 
particularly smaller reporting companies.\403\ Below, we request 
comment on whether our current PRA estimates continue to be 
appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \401\ For BDCs, for the purposes of the PRA, we estimated the 
average annual compliance costs in the 3 years following the 
adoption of the rule to be 30,503 burden hours of in-house Inline 
XBRL preparation and $3,488,200 in outside services. See infra Part 
V.B.2. We monetize the burden of in-house Inline XBRL preparation by 
multiplying the burden hours by an estimated wage rate of $400 per 
hour (30,503 x $400 = $12,201,200). The estimated wage figure is 
based on analysis in previous rulemakings. The average cost per BDC 
is calculated by adding the monetized internal burden ($12,201,200) 
to the cost of outside services ($3,488,200) and dividing by the 
number of BDCs (103).
    \402\ For registered CEFs, for the purposes of the PRA, we 
estimated the average annual compliance costs in the 3 years 
following the adoption of the rule to be 10,725 burden hours of in-
house Inline XBRL preparation and $772,200 in outside services. See 
infra Part V.B.2. We monetize the burden of in-house Inline XBRL 
preparation by multiplying the burden hours by an estimated wage 
rate of $400 per hour (10,725 x $400 = $4,290,000). The estimated 
wage figure is based on analysis in previous rulemakings. The 
average cost per registered CEF is calculated by adding the 
monetized internal burden ($4,290,000) to the cost of outside 
services ($772,200) and dividing by the number of registered CEFs 
(704).
    \403\ See American Institute of CPAs, XBRL Costs for Small 
Companies Have Declined 45%, According to AICPA Study (Aug. 18, 
2018), available at https://www.aicpa.org/press/pressreleases/2018/xbrl-costs-have-declined-according-to-aicpa-study.html; CFA 
Institute, The Cost of Structured Data: Myth vs. Reality, available 
at https://www.cfainstitute.org/-/media/documents/survey/the-cost-of-structured-data-myth-vs-reality-august-2017.ashx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As an alternative, we could have proposed to allow but not require 
affected funds to present cover page, financial statement, and 
important prospectus disclosure items information in Inline XBRL. 
Compared to the proposed rules, a fully voluntary Inline XBRL program 
would lower costs for those filers that do not find Inline XBRL to be 
cost efficient. We also could have

[[Page 14496]]

proposed requiring the Inline XBRL requirements only for a subset of 
affected funds--for example, affected funds that file short-form 
registration statements on Form N-2 or WKSIs. We also could have 
proposed to permit more than one structured data format or leave the 
precise format unspecified. However, a voluntary program or the use of 
multiple structured data formats would also reduce potential data 
quality benefits compared to mandatory Inline XBRL, as would a program 
that captures only a subset of affected funds. If the information were 
not submitted by the affected funds in a standardized, structured, 
machine-readable format, investors and other data users who wish to 
instantly analyze, aggregate, and compare the data would be required to 
incur the costs of paying a third-party provider to manually rekey the 
data, review the data for data quality problems during the duplication 
process, and disseminate the data to the users.\404\ Alternatively, 
investors or data users unwilling to pay a third-party provider would 
have to incur the time to do that process themselves. In either 
scenario, the data would not be usable in as timely a manner if it were 
made machine-readable in a standardized format. In addition, under a 
voluntary program, data that is not submitted in Inline XBRL would not 
be validated, thus decreasing the overall data quality of the data 
submitted. Unlike the machine readable XBRL format, data submitted in 
unstructured formats (e.g., HTML, ASCII) is not machine readable at the 
element level and thereby cannot be validated by EDGAR in any way. 
Thus, data submitted in the HTML format by affected funds that opted 
not to use Inline XBRL and XBRL data submitted by other affected funds 
could be different due to the level of pre-submission validation 
activities. Poor data quality reduces any data user's ability to 
meaningfully analyze, aggregate, and compare data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \404\ Some studies have shown that investors use XBRL files 
often, even preferring them to non-XBRL files when both are 
available. See Yu Cong, Hui Du, and Miklos A. Vasarhelyi, Are XBRL 
Files Being Accessed? Evidence from the SEC EDGAR Log File Dataset, 
Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 32-3, 23-29 (2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As another alternative, we could propose to require the disclosures 
to be filed in another structured format, such as the non-Inline XBRL 
or XML format. Compared to the proposed Inline XBRL requirement, the 
use of the non-Inline XBRL format entails more duplication, which can 
adversely affect the quality and usability of the structured data as 
well as the efficiency and cost of preparation and review of the 
structured data. Compared to the proposed requirement to use Inline 
XBRL, the alternative of requiring the use of XML could result in lower 
costs for filers. However, compared to the proposed amendments, XML 
would provide less flexibility in tagging complex information as well 
as less extensive data quality validation capabilities. Given the 
complexity of the information required to be tagged and its importance 
to investors, Commission staff, and other data users, we believe the 
benefits from the use of Inline XBRL would outweigh its higher cost 
compared to XML.\405\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \405\ In contrast, the information provided in Form 24F-2 is 
less complex and is generally only used by fund issuers and 
Commission staff for purposes of calculating certain registered 
investment companies' registration fees, so we have proposed to 
require Form 24F-2 information in a structured XML format rather 
than Inline XBRL.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As another alternative, we could have expanded the scope of 
prospectus disclosure information required to be tagged in Inline XBRL 
under the proposed rules. Compared to the proposed rules, this 
alternative would improve the timeliness and usability of the required 
disclosure information, but potentially impose additional costs on 
affected funds. To the extent that the other required prospectus 
disclosures of affected funds contain information that is more specific 
to individual funds without sufficient comparability or aggregation 
utility, the benefits of having those additional required disclosures 
in a structured format may be lower than the more limited subset of 
disclosures required to be filed in Inline XBRL under the proposed 
rules. As another alternative, we could have narrowed the scope of 
prospectus disclosure information required to be tagged in Inline XBRL 
under the proposed rules. Compared to the proposed rules, this 
alternative could decrease the timeliness and usability of the required 
disclosure information, but potentially reduce costs for registrants. 
Overall, the prospectus disclosure information proposed to be filed in 
Inline XBRL largely parallels the information that is required of 
mutual funds and ETFs, and we believe it is likely to be of greatest 
utility for investors and others that seek to use the information in a 
structured format to assist with investment decisions regarding 
affected funds.
    We also are proposing to require registered investment companies 
that file Form 24F-2 (including mutual funds and ETFs, as well as 
interval funds under our proposed rules) to submit the form in a 
structured XML format.\406\ We believe use of a structured data format 
would make it easier for issuers to accurately prepare and submit the 
information required by Form 24F-2 and would make the submitted 
information more useful to Commission staff. Automated validation 
processes could help issuers compute registration fees accurately 
before submitting the filing, which could reduce administrative burdens 
associated with correcting inaccurate filings. A structured filing 
format could also facilitate pre-population of previously-filed 
information. We estimate the cost of tagging Form 24F-2 in a structured 
XML format to be $522 per fund.\407\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \406\ See supra Part II.H.1.d.
    \407\ We assume that the burden of tagging Form 24F-2 in a 
structured XML format would be 2 hours for each filing. See infra 
Part V.B.7. At an estimated wage rate of $261 per hour, the dollar 
cost for filing Form 24F-2 in a structured XML format is $522 (2 
hours x $261 per hour) per fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Periodic Reporting Requirements
    We are proposing certain new annual report requirements for 
affected funds that file a short-form registration statement on Form N-
2. These funds would be required to include in their annual reports 
certain information that they currently disclose in their prospectus--a 
table of fees and expenses, share price information, and a table of 
senior securities--and a discussion of unresolved staff comments.\408\ 
In addition, all BDCs would be required to include financial highlights 
in their registration statements and annual reports.\409\ We also 
propose to require all registered CEFs to provide management's 
discussion of fund performance in their annual reports.\410\ Finally, 
registered CEFs that rely on rule 8b-16 under the Investment Company 
Act to avoid annually updating their registration statements would be 
required to provide more expansive disclosure about certain key changes 
in their annual reports.\411\ We believe these proposed requirements 
would promote investor protection by making important information more 
readily accessible to investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \408\ See supra Part II.H.2.a and Part II.H.2.d.
    \409\ See supra Part II.H.2.c.
    \410\ See supra Part II.H.2.b.
    \411\ See supra Part II.H.5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to affected funds filing short-form registration 
statements on Form N-2, the proposed annual report requirements would 
compile certain information that is already available in a fund's 
registration statement. This could be beneficial to some investors in 
these funds since information would be readily available in one 
document instead of investors having the need to

[[Page 14497]]

compile it from several sources. As previously noted, given the ability 
of affected funds to use forward incorporation by reference under the 
short-form registration instruction, these funds' annual reports may 
become a more convenient and comprehensive source of information about 
a particular seasoned fund, relative to that fund's registration 
statement. At the same time, the proposed annual report requirements 
may increase the compliance costs for seasoned funds because new 
information items would have to be added to the annual report. However, 
because the annual report would be incorporated by reference into the 
fund's prospectus, requiring disclosure in both the prospectus and 
annual report should not require duplicative disclosure. Moreover, 
specifying identical disclosure requirements in both places may 
facilitate forward incorporation by reference, by making clear that the 
same required disclosure will satisfy both requirements. Alternatively, 
we could have proposed to require affected funds to include in their 
annual reports more or less information from their registration 
statements. While requiring less information would reduce costs to 
affected funds by reducing the amount of required annual report 
disclosure, it could also make it more difficult for investors to find 
important fund information. Requiring affected funds to include more 
prospectus information in their annual reports than we have proposed 
could increase the length and complexity of annual reports and make 
them less useful to investors overall. This alternative would also 
increase affected funds' compliance costs.
    The proposed requirement to disclose unresolved staff comments in 
the annual report is designed to mitigate the concern that other 
aspects of the proposal may eliminate some incentives that certain 
affected funds may have to resolve staff comments in a timely manner. 
This requirement may, however, impose certain compliance costs to the 
extent a seasoned fund does not timely resolve staff comments and hence 
would be required to provide such disclosure. We do not believe these 
disclosure costs would be significant because the information would be 
readily available to the affected fund. We recognize, however, there 
could be some costs to affected funds associated with compliance and 
legal review to the extent an affected fund wanted to provide 
additional information in its annual report disclosure beyond that 
provided in the fund's written response to the staff's comment (which 
would typically already be publicly available on EDGAR).
    With respect to the proposal to require BDCs to provide financial 
highlights information, we believe that investors would benefit from 
disclosure summarizing a BDC's financial statements. We believe the 
costs associated with this proposed requirement should be minimal since 
we understand that it is general market practice for BDCs to include 
this information in their registration statements.
    We believe the proposal to require registered CEFs to include MDFP 
disclosure would be beneficial to investors by helping them assess a 
fund's performance over the prior year and complementing other 
information in the report, which may make the annual report disclosure 
more understandable as a whole. This requirement would also promote 
parity between different types of funds, as open-end funds and BDCs are 
already required to provide similar disclosure in their annual reports. 
This proposed requirement would likely increase compliance burdens for 
registered CEFs, to the extent they do not voluntarily provide MDFP 
disclosure already. We believe that a majority of registered CEFs 
already provide MDFP-like disclosure in their annual shareholder 
reports. We estimate the annual cost of providing MDFP disclosure to be 
$8,000 per registered CEF,\412\ although this cost would likely be 
lower for affected funds that already provide MDFP-like disclosure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \412\ For the purpose of the PRA, we estimate that the proposed 
amendments to require registered CEFs to provide MDFP in their 
annual reports would result in an additional 20 burden hours for 
registered CEFs. See infra Part V.B.3. We monetize the internal 
burden by multiplying the burden hours by an estimated wage rate of 
$400 per hour (20 x $400 = $8,000).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We considered proposing additional MDFP requirements, such as 
requirements to: (1) Disclose the impact of particular investments 
(including large positions and/or significant investments) or 
investment types that contributed to or detracted from performance; (2) 
explain a fund's performance in relation to its index; (3) explain how 
the use of leverage affected fund performance; (4) explain the reason 
for and effect of any large cash or temporary defensive positions on 
fund performance; (5) explain the effect of any tax strategies, or the 
effects of taxes, on fund performance; (6) explain the effect of non-
recurring or non-cash income on fund performance; (7) include general 
discussion of purchases and sales of fund shares and the effects of any 
share repurchases or tender offers on fund performance; and/or (8) 
disclose whether the fund engages in high portfolio turnover and the 
effect of portfolio turnover on fund performance. We also considered 
proposing changes to the proposed average annual total return table to 
provide additional or more useful information to investors, such as 
requiring total return based on per-share net asset value, in addition 
to (as is proposed) total return based on current market price. 
Although one or more of these changes could result in additional, 
potentially helpful information for investors, we also considered the 
administrative costs that additional disclosure requirements would 
impose and have determined not to propose them at this time.
    Under the proposed amendments to rule 8b-16, registered CEFs 
relying on the rule would be required to describe certain key changes 
that occurred during the relevant year in enough detail to allow 
investors to understand each change and how it may affect the fund. We 
estimate that approximately 489 registered CEFs relied on rule 8b-16 as 
of December 31, 2018.\413\ These registered CEFs also would be required 
to preface this disclosure with a legend clarifying that the 
disclosures provide only a summary of certain changes that have 
occurred in the past year, and that the summary may not reflect all of 
the changes that have occurred. We believe this new requirement would 
allow investors in funds relying on rule 8b-16 to more easily identify 
and understand key information about their investments. Because these 
funds are already required to disclose the enumerated changes, the 
proposed new requirement would likely add only a small incremental 
compliance burden.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \413\ See infra footnote 584.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. New Current Reporting Requirements for Affected Funds
    Currently, registered CEFs generally are not required to report 
information on Form 8-K, although listed registered CEFs are subject to 
exchange rules that require listed issuers to provide the market 
current information in response to certain events. We are proposing to 
require that registered CEFs comply with Form 8-K reporting 
requirements. Notably, Form 8-K would require disclosure within 4 
business days of the relevant event, while the existing regime for 
registered CEFs calls for disclosure on an annual or semi-annual basis, 
with exchange rules requiring some current disclosure from listed 
registered CEFs.
    We are also proposing amendments to Form 8-K to add certain new 
reporting

[[Page 14498]]

items that would apply to both BDCs and registered CEFs to better 
tailor Form 8-K disclosure to these types of investment companies. The 
additional reporting items we propose are designed to recognize certain 
differences between events that are relevant to affected funds and 
those that are relevant to operating companies. The new reportable 
events would be triggered if an affected fund has: (1) A material 
change to its investment objectives or policies; or (2) a material 
write-down in fair value of a significant investment.
    We believe these amendments would improve current reporting of 
important information by affected funds to investors and the market, 
thus promoting investor protection. For example, the proposed 
requirement to file a Form 8-K report when an affected fund materially 
changes its investment objectives or policies would provide investors 
with more timely information about significant changes to a fund's 
investment strategies, which would allow investors to better assess 
whether a new investment strategy is aligned with their individual 
investment goals. Requiring Form 8-K reporting about material write-
downs of significant investments would give investors more current 
information about events that are likely to significantly impact the 
value of their investments, particularly with respect to affected 
funds' less liquid holdings where there is a lack of market 
transparency regarding potential valuation changes between funds' 
periodic reports.
    Additionally, while affected funds may provide certain current 
information to investors or the market through press releases, and BDCs 
must report under existing Form 8-K provisions, requiring all affected 
funds to provide information on Form 8-K--including information that is 
tailored to the business and structure of affected funds--would better 
standardize the types of information that affected funds report and 
would make current information about affected funds more readily 
accessible in one place (EDGAR). Enhancing the amount of current 
information about affected funds available to investors and the market 
could facilitate more efficient pricing of affected funds' shares (to 
the extent they do not trade at NAV) and could make it easier for an 
affected fund to develop a market following, which could improve its 
ability to attract new investors.
    Requiring affected funds to provide new current reporting may 
increase their compliance costs. For example, registered CEFs generally 
are not required to report information on Form 8-K and currently may 
not be subject to any disclosure requirements related to certain Form 
8-K events. As discussed above, however, 75 registered CEFs reported 
information on Form 8-K voluntarily in 2018, whether pursuant to 
exchange rules or otherwise.\414\ Additionally, listed registered CEFs, 
and any other registered CEFs that make voluntary disclosures on Form 
8-K, may be able to leverage their experience with making certain 
prompt, public disclosures to comply with Form 8-K requirements. Those 
registered CEFs that are not exchange-listed, and that do not currently 
report information on Form 8-K, would not have prior experience to 
leverage, and thus the relative burdens associated with the proposed 
Form 8-K requirements could be higher for these funds if their advisers 
do not also advise other funds that file reports on Form 8-K.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \414\ Only 10 of those 75 registered CEFs were unlisted 
registered CEFs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Also, we recognize that certain items in Form 8-K are substantively 
the same as or similar to existing disclosure requirements for 
registered CEFs, although the existing requirements provide less-timely 
disclosure. This should reduce burdens to some extent since registered 
CEFs are already familiar with providing such disclosure. However, we 
recognize there are certain costs associated with potentially 
duplicative disclosure requirements, although we believe these costs 
should not be significant. These costs would be associated with 
preparing the Form 8-K disclosure. We do not anticipate that the 
proposed Form 8-K requirements would increase affected funds' 
compliance costs associated with existing disclosure requirements. The 
proposed requirements may, to some extent, reallocate certain of 
affected funds' existing disclosure costs to preparing Form 8-K 
disclosure since affected funds may be able to use the Form 8-K 
disclosure to help prepare disclosures that they are currently required 
to provide in annual or other periodic reports. Further, we believe it 
would be beneficial to investors to retain existing shareholder report 
disclosure requirements to reduce potential disruptions to shareholders 
and limit discrepancies between different types of funds' shareholder 
reports.
    With regard to the new reportable events on Form 8-K that we are 
proposing, all affected funds would have to monitor for and report 
these new events on Form 8-K, which would likely increase compliance 
costs, including costs associated with preparing and filing the new 
Form 8-K disclosure. We believe that affected funds will be aware of 
information regarding these events, as this information is important 
for their operations, and thus it would not impose substantial costs 
for them to supply it on Form 8-K. We also believe that these events, 
along with those currently covered by Form 8-K, will occur relatively 
infrequently. This should reduce the associated reporting burden. The 
existing items on Form 8-K generally have not led to frequent reporting 
obligations for BDCs. For example, over a 3-year period from June 1, 
2015 to May 31, 2018, BDCs filed or furnished approximately 3,080 
reports on Form 8-K, with an estimated average of 10 reports per BDC 
per year.\415\ Of the 3,080 reports, approximately 931 were furnished 
or filed under non-mandatory reporting items--Item 7.01 (Regulation FD 
Disclosure) and Item 8.01 (Other Events).\416\ Further, over this 3-
year period, BDCs filed or furnished 25 or fewer reports under 15 of 
the 23 mandatory reporting items applicable to non-ABS issuers. We 
estimate the overall costs of reporting new information on Form 8-K to 
be $19,553,600 per fund for registered CEFs \417\ and $206,000 per fund 
for BDCs.\418\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \415\ As noted above, as of December 31, 2018, there were 103 
BDCs. If we assume there were 103 BDCs over the three-year period 
and approximately 1,027 reports each year (3,080/3 = 1,027) 
distributed evenly across each BDC, then each BDC would have filed 
approximately 10 Form 8-K reports each year (1,027/103 = 10).
    \416\ Some of these 931 reports were filed under Item 9.01 
(Financial Statements and Exhibits), in addition to Item 7.01 or 
Item 8.01.
    \417\ For purposes of the PRA, we estimate the annual 
incremental paperwork burden for CEFs to prepare and file the Form 
8-K under the proposed amendments would be approximately 36,663 
burden hours of internal time and a cost of approximately $4,888,400 
for the services of outside professionals. See infra Part V.B.6. We 
monetize the internal burden by multiplying the burden hours by an 
estimated wage rate of $400 per hour (36,663 x $400 = $14,665,200).
    \418\ For purposes of the PRA, we estimate the annual 
incremental paperwork burden for BDCs to prepare and file the Form 
8-K under the proposed amendments would be approximately 386.25 
burden hours of internal time and a cost of approximately $51,500 
for the services of outside professionals. See infra Part V.B.6. We 
monetize the internal time by multiplying the burden hours by an 
estimated wage rate of $400 per hour (386.25 x $400 = $154,500).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Also, we are proposing to extend the safe harbor for failure to 
report certain Form 8-K items to include the new proposed reporting 
items for affected funds. Failure to report under these proposed items 
also would not impact an affected fund's eligibility to file a short-
form registration statement on Form N-2. This should limit liability 
concerns and the potential impact on an

[[Page 14499]]

affected fund's ability to raise capital associated with failing to 
timely file a report under these items.
    As an alternative, we could have not proposed to require current 
reporting on Form 8-K by certain or all registered CEFs. For example, 
we could have proposed to require Form 8-K reporting for only listed 
registered CEFs, or only those registered CEFs that qualify as WKSIs or 
are eligible to use a short-form registration statement. This approach 
would reduce costs for certain registered CEFs, but it would also 
create informational disparities among registered CEF investors and 
disadvantage investors in unlisted registered CEFs. Unlisted registered 
CEFs already may provide less transparency than listed registered CEFs 
in certain respects given that unlisted registered CEFs are not 
required to provide current information under exchange rules. Further, 
if we excluded all registered CEFs from Form 8-K reporting, this 
approach would disproportionately advantage registered CEFs as opposed 
to BDCs and operating companies, particularly with respect to those 
that are permitted to qualify as WKSIs or seasoned issuers.
    We also could have proposed to require affected registered CEFs to 
file Form 8-K, but not added any new items tailored to BDCs and 
registered CEFs. Such an alternative may decrease the compliance costs 
for affected funds, while at the same time addressing the current lack 
of parity between registered CEFs and BDCs in terms of current 
reporting to investors and the market. We believe, however, that the 
proposed reporting items would enhance the information flow to 
investors and the market by providing timely and important value-
relevant information. We also believe that it enhances parity between 
affected funds and operating companies with respect to the amount of 
current information available to investors since affected funds are 
unlikely to report information under several existing Form 8-K items.
    As a further alternative, we could have proposed to tailor the Form 
8-K requirements to affected funds by identifying certain items these 
funds would not be required to report. This approach could have reduced 
costs to affected funds by expressly providing that they are not 
required to monitor for or report certain events. However, while we 
believe that certain items will never or very rarely create reporting 
obligations for affected funds, excluding affected funds from certain 
reporting requirements may unduly complicate Form 8-K and may not 
provide tangible benefits since affected funds are unlikely to be 
subject to such reporting requirements regardless of whether we provide 
specific exclusions.
    Finally, rather than propose to require affected funds to report 
information about material write-downs of significant investments, we 
could have proposed to require them to file Form 8-K reports when they 
experience a significant decline in NAV. This approach would apply more 
generally to all affected funds (rather than only those funds that hold 
significant investments) and would likely result in more Form 8-K 
reporting by affected funds, which could increase the flow of 
information to investors that is relevant to their investment 
decisions. While additional reporting could also increase costs to 
affected funds, a decline in NAV could be easier for affected funds to 
monitor and report. However, some affected funds already publicly 
disclose their NAVs on a daily or weekly basis, which could result in 
any associated Form 8-K reporting providing stale information. Since 
affected funds disclose their NAVs at different frequencies--ranging 
from daily to semi-annually--establishing a baseline for measuring a 
decline in NAV would present certain difficulties and would likely 
result in either inconsistent reporting standards across affected funds 
or less-relevant reporting by certain funds.
5. Online Availability of Information Incorporated by Reference
    We are proposing to modernize Form N-2's requirements for backward 
incorporation by reference by all affected funds.\419\ Affected funds 
would no longer be required to deliver to new investors information 
that they have incorporated by reference. Instead, we are proposing 
that these funds make the incorporated materials and corresponding 
prospectus and SAI readily available and accessible on a website 
maintained by or for the fund and identified in the fund's prospectus 
or SAI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \419\ See supra Part II.H.4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We believe that this new requirement would improve the 
information's overall accessibility to investors. In particular, this 
new requirement would make the incorporated information, prospectus, 
and SAI more accessible to retail investors, who we believe may be more 
inclined to look at a fund's website for information than to search the 
EDGAR system.\420\ Affected funds would also be required to provide 
incorporated materials upon request free of charge. In addition, the 
proposed rule would increase the likelihood that fund investors view 
the information in their preferred format, and thereby increase their 
use of the information to make investment decisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \420\ For example, results from a 2011 investor testing 
sponsored by the Commission (available at www.sec.gov/comments/s7-08-15/s70815.shtml) suggest that an investor looking for a fund's 
annual report is most likely to seek it out on the fund's website. 
Additionally, a 2015 survey by the Investment Company Institute 
(available at http://www.ici.org/research/stats/factbook) suggests 
an increasing trend of U.S. households using the internet for 
financial purposes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We do not expect that this proposal would result in a substantial 
reduction in the amount of the information affected funds deliver to 
investors through the mail or electronically, because we expect that 
most affected funds would rely on rules 172 and 173, as we propose to 
amend them, to satisfy their prospectus delivery obligations. An issuer 
that uses these rules will satisfy its final prospectus delivery 
obligations by filing the prospectus with the Commission rather than 
delivering the prospectus and any incorporated material to 
investors.\421\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \421\ See supra Part II.D.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We do not believe this requirement would generate significant 
compliance costs for affected funds because many funds currently post 
their annual and semi-annual reports and other fund information on 
their websites. We estimate the annual cost to comply with the proposed 
website posting requirements to be $478 per fund.\422\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \422\ For the purpose of the PRA, we estimate an average burden 
to comply with the website posting requirements of 2 hours per fund. 
See infra Part V.B.1. The expected compliance cost associated with 
the proposed website posting requirements is calculated by 
multiplying the 2-hour burden by the estimated hourly wage based on 
published rates for webmasters ($239). See also Variable Contract 
Summary Prospectus Proposing Release, supra footnote 172, at 61832.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Affected funds may also incur printing and mailing costs under the 
proposal if some investors request paper copies of the prospectus \423\ 
or of information that has been incorporated by reference into the 
prospectus or SAI but not delivered with the prospectus or SAI.\424\ In 
another release, the Commission estimated that the annual printing and 
mailing cost associated with providing copies of prospectuses and other 
documents upon request would be approximately $500 per registrant.\425\ 
We are similarly proposing a requirement to send prospectuses and 
related information here, and we have no reason to assume significant 
differences in the average lengths of the associated materials or the 
frequency of

[[Page 14500]]

investor requests under this proposal. We estimate that the printing 
and mailing costs associated with the proposed requirements would be 
approximately $750 per fund in recognition that the requirement to 
deliver information that has been incorporated by reference may result 
in greater overall costs since affected funds that are eligible to file 
short-form registration statements under the proposal would be able to 
use incorporation by reference more frequently.\426\ We anticipate, 
however, that investors may be less likely to request copies of 
materials that have been incorporated by reference into an affected 
fund's prospectus or SAI, so we believe this requirement would only 
incrementally increase costs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \423\ See supra footnote 109.
    \424\ See supra Part II.H.4.
    \425\ See Variable Contract Summary Prospectus Proposing 
Release, supra footnote 172, at 61812, 61832.
    \426\ We do not have specific data regarding how often investors 
may request copies of prospectuses or incorporated materials, how 
many materials affected funds would incorporate by reference into 
their prospectuses or SAIs, and how lengthy those materials would 
be, so we request comment on this estimate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Alternatively, we could have left Form N-2's backward incorporation 
by reference requirements as-is and continued to require funds to 
deliver incorporated materials to new investors. Because current 
General Instruction F of Form N-2 does not require affected funds to 
make incorporated materials available online, funds would not have to 
incur costs associated with website posting. However, because affected 
funds that choose to rely on rules 172 and 173, as proposed, would be 
deemed to have delivered their disclosures upon filing with the 
Commission instead of giving them to investors, the current backward 
incorporation delivery requirement would not result in the delivery of 
incorporated materials to their investors, thus making less accessible 
the disclosure materials that might affect their investment decision.

F. Request for Comments

    We request comment on the potential costs and benefits of the 
proposed rules and whether the rules, if adopted, would promote 
efficiency, competition, and capital formation or have an impact or 
burden on competition. Commenters are requested to provide empirical 
data, estimation methodologies, and other factual support for their 
views, particularly as they relate to costs and benefits estimates. Our 
specific questions follow.
     We seek information that would help us quantify or 
otherwise qualitatively assess the benefits of the proposed rules. 
Please provide any data, studies, or other evidence that would allow us 
to quantify some or all of the benefits. Are there any other benefits 
from the proposed rules?
     We seek information that would help us quantify compliance 
and other costs resulting from the proposed rules. Please provide any 
data, studies, or other evidence that would allow us to quantify some 
or all of the costs. Are there any other potential costs of the 
proposed rules?
     Are our estimates of the compliance costs of requiring 
affected funds to tag in Inline XBRL format certain information 
reasonable? Is there a fixed component of the XBRL reporting? Are there 
any other types of costs that should be considered? Are affected funds 
more likely perform the tagging in-house or retain outside service 
providers?
     Are our estimates of the compliance costs of requiring 
registered CEFs to include MDFP disclosure in their annual reports 
reasonable? Are there any other types of costs that should be 
considered?
     Are our estimates of the compliance costs of requiring 
registered CEFs to report information on Form 8-K, and requiring 
affected funds to provide new current reporting on Form 8-K, 
reasonable? Are there any other types of costs that should be 
considered?
     Are our estimates of the compliance costs of requiring 
affected funds to make the incorporated materials and corresponding 
prospectus and SAI readily available and accessible on a website 
maintained by or for the fund reasonable? Are our estimates of the 
compliance costs of requiring affected funds to deliver a copy of 
information incorporated by reference into its prospectus or SAI to 
investors upon request reasonable? Are there any other types of costs 
that should be considered?
     Are our estimates of the compliance costs of requiring 
registered investment companies that file Form 24F-2 to file it in an 
XML format reasonable? Are there any other types of costs that should 
be considered?
     Are there any other potential effects on competition, 
efficiency, and capital formation that could result from the proposed 
rules?

V. Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis

A. Background

    Certain provisions of the proposed amendments contain ``collection 
of information'' requirements within the meaning of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA).\427\ We are submitting the proposed 
amendments to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review in 
accordance with 44 U.S.C. 3507(d) and 5 CFR 1320.11. The hours and 
costs associated with preparing disclosure, filing forms, and retaining 
records constitute reporting and cost burdens imposed by the 
collections of information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a 
person is not required to respond to, a collection of information 
unless it displays a currently valid control number. The titles for the 
collection of information are:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \427\ 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
    \428\ Recently, we issued a release that, among other things, 
proposed to retitle this information collection as ``Registered 
Investment Company Interactive Data.'' See Variable Contract Summary 
Prospectus Proposing Release, supra footnote 172. If adopted, the 
proposed amendments to require BDCs to provide structured data would 
be included in this information collection. In light of these 
proposed amendments, we propose to rename this information 
collection as ``Investment Company Interactive Data'' to reflect 
that this information collection would be applicable to BDCs as well 
as registered investment companies.
    \429\ The paperwork burdens for the rules under section 8(b) of 
the Investment Company Act are imposed through the forms and reports 
that are subject to the requirements in these rules and are 
reflected in the PRA burdens of those documents. To avoid a PRA 
inventory reflecting duplicative burdens and for administrative 
convenience, we assign a one-hour burden to these rules.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            OMB control
                          Title                                 No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Form N-2................................................       3235-0026
Mutual Fund Interactive Data \428\......................       3235-0642
Rule 30e-1..............................................       3235-0025
Form 10-K...............................................       3235-0063
Family of rules under section 8(b) of the Investment           3235-0176
 Company Act of 1940 \429\..............................
Rule 163................................................       3235-0619
Rule 433................................................       3235-0617
Rule 173................................................       3235-0618
Form 8-K................................................       3235-0060
Form 24F-2..............................................       3235-0456
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The rules, forms, and regulations listed above were adopted under 
the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, or the Investment Company Act. 
They set forth the disclosure requirements for registration statements, 
prospectuses, periodic and current reports, and certified shareholder 
reports that are prepared by registrants to help investors make 
informed investment and voting decisions. They also permit additional 
communications by registrants during a registered offering. The 
proposed amendments, if adopted, would allow affected funds to use the 
securities offering rules that are already available to operating 
companies. In addition, the proposed rules would include amendments to 
our rules and forms intended to tailor the disclosure and regulatory 
framework to affected funds.

[[Page 14501]]

    The Mutual Fund Interactive Data collection of information 
references current requirements for certain registered investment 
companies to submit to the Commission information included in their 
registration statements, or information included in or amended by any 
post-effective amendments to such registration statements, in response 
to certain items of Form N-1A in interactive data format. It also 
references the requirement for funds to submit an Interactive Data File 
to the Commission for any form of prospectus filed pursuant to rule 
497(c) or (e) that includes information in response to same items of 
Form N-1A. The proposed amendments would include several new structured 
data requirements, including requirements for: (1) BDCs to submit 
financial statement information using Inline XBRL format; (2) affected 
funds to include structured cover page information in their 
registration statements on Form N-2 using Inline XBRL format; and (3) 
affected funds to tag certain prospectus information using Inline XBRL 
format.\430\ Although the proposed interactive data filing requirements 
would be included in the proposed Form N-2 instructions, we are 
separately reflecting the hour and cost burdens for these requirements 
in the burden estimate for Mutual Fund Interactive Data and not in the 
estimate for Form N-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \430\ We are also proposing new requirements for funds that file 
on Form 24F-2 to submit the form in XML format. We account for the 
burdens associated with this proposed requirement in infra Part 
V.B.7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The information collection requirements related to registration 
statements and Exchange Act reports would be mandatory. In addition, 
there would be no mandatory retention period for the information 
disclosed, and the information gathered would be made publicly 
available. The information collection requirements related to the 
communications and prospectus delivery proposals would apply only to 
affected funds and other offering participants choosing to rely on 
them. There would be a mandatory record retention period with respect 
to the communications and prospectus delivery information collections. 
Under rule 433, issuers and offering participants must retain all free 
writing prospectuses that have been used, for three years following the 
date of the initial bona fide offering of the securities in question 
that were not filed with the Commission. Moreover, free writing 
prospectuses that are made by or on behalf of an affected fund, and 
free writing prospectuses that are broadly disseminated by another 
offering participant, would have to be filed and would be publicly 
available on EDGAR, whereas free writing prospectuses prepared by or on 
behalf of, or used or referred to, by offering participants other than 
the issuer would not have to be filed.

B. Summary of the Proposed Amendments and Impact on Information 
Collections

    We are proposing amendments to several rules and forms that would 
modify the registration, communications, and offering processes for 
affected funds under the Securities Act and Investment Company Act. The 
proposals are designed to carry out the requirements of section 803 of 
the BDC Act and section 509 of the Registered CEF Act. The proposed 
amendments generally would allow affected funds to use the securities 
offering rules that are already available to operating companies.
    The proposed amendments would principally affect five aspects of 
the application of our securities offering rules to affected funds. 
First, the proposed amendments would streamline the registration 
process under the Securities Act for affected funds to allow them to 
sell securities more quickly and efficiently under a shelf registration 
process tailored to affected funds. Second, the proposed amendments 
would allow affected funds to qualify as WKSIs under rule 405 under the 
Securities Act. Third, the proposed amendments would allow affected 
funds to satisfy final prospectus delivery requirements using the same 
method as operating companies. Fourth, the proposed amendments would 
allow affected funds to use communications rules currently available to 
operating companies, such as the use of certain factual business 
information, forward-looking information, a ``free writing 
prospectus,'' and broker-dealer research reports. Finally, the proposed 
amendments would tailor affected funds' disclosure and regulatory 
framework in light of the proposed amendments to the offering rules 
applicable to them. These amendments include new structured data 
requirements, new disclosure requirements for annual reports, a new 
requirement for registered CEFs to file current reports on Form 8-K 
(including new Form 8-K items tailored to registered CEFs and BDCs), 
and a proposal to require interval funds to pay securities registration 
fees using the same method that mutual funds and ETFs use today.
    We anticipate that several provisions of the proposed amendments 
would increase the burdens and costs for affected funds that would be 
subject to the proposed amendments. We have estimated the average 
number of hours an affected fund would spend to prepare and file the 
information collections and the average hourly rate for the services of 
outside professionals. In deriving our estimates, we recognize that the 
burdens will likely vary among individual affected funds based on a 
number of factors, including their size and the nature of their 
investment activities. In addition, some affected funds may experience 
costs in excess of our estimates, and some may experience less than the 
estimated average costs.
1. Proposed Amendments to Form N-2 Registration Statement
    Form N-2 is the form used by an affected fund to register offerings 
under the Securities Act and, as applicable, to register as an 
investment company under the Investment Company Act.
    The proposed amendments to Form N-2 would increase the existing 
disclosure burdens of the form by requiring:
     Affected funds to use new checkboxes on the cover page to 
provide information about the fund, the purpose of the filing, and the 
type of offering, including whether the form is being used for 
automatic shelf registration; \431\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \431\ See supra Part II.H.1.b; see also proposed checkboxes to 
Form N-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     BDCs to include financial highlights disclosure in their 
registration statements, as registered CEFs are currently required to 
do; \432\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \432\ See supra Part II.H.2.c; see also proposed amendments to 
Instruction 1 to Item 4 of Form N-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Affected funds to provide new undertakings to be furnished 
in registration statements being filed pursuant to rule 415; \433\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \433\ See supra footnote 53 and accompanying paragraph; see also 
proposed Items 34.4-7 of Form N-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Affected funds to make certain documents available online 
if they incorporate them by reference, including the prospectus, SAI, 
and any Exchange Act reports filed under section 13 or section 15(d) of 
the Exchange Act that are incorporated by reference into the fund's 
prospectus or SAI.\434\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \434\ See supra Part II.H.4; see also proposed General 
Instruction F.4.a of Form N-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At the same time, the proposed amendments to Form N-2 would 
decrease existing burdens for the form by:

[[Page 14502]]

     Permitting eligible affected funds to forward incorporate 
by reference Exchange Act reports, which would reduce the need for such 
funds to file a post-effective amendment or a prospectus supplement to 
update information in the registration statement.\435\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \435\ See supra Part II.B.2.c; see also proposed General 
Instruction F.3.b of Form N-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission has previously estimated that there are 136 initial 
registration statements and 30 post-effective amendments to initial 
registration statements filed on Form N-2 annually.\436\ Under the 
most-recently approved PRA estimates, we estimate that the hour burden 
for preparing and filing an initial registration statement on Form N-2 
is 515 hours, and the hour burden for preparing and filing a post-
effective amendment is 107 hours.\437\ Under these estimates, the 
aggregate annual hour burden for preparing and filing initial 
registration statements is therefore 70,040 hours (136 initial 
registration statements x 515 hours), and the current estimated 
aggregate annual hour burden for preparing and filing post-effective 
amendments is 3,210 hours (30 post-effective amendments x 107 hours). 
Thus, under these estimates, the current total annual hour burden for 
Form N-2 is estimated to be 73,250 hours (70,040 hours + 3,210 hours). 
In addition, under currently-approved PRA estimates, the aggregate 
annual cost burden for Form N-2 is $4,668,396,\438\ and the average 
annual cost burden is approximately $28,123 per fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \436\ These estimates are based on the last time the form's 
information collections were approved, pursuant to a submission for 
a PRA extension in 2016.
    \437\ The paperwork burdens for Form N-2 include the burdens of 
preparing and filing prospectus supplements. While affected funds 
may file fewer prospectus supplements under the proposed amendments, 
we are uncertain as to the extent, if any, of the reduction in the 
number of prospectus supplements that affected funds would file 
under the proposals. See supra Part II.B.
    \438\ This estimate includes the cost of outside counsel, 
independent auditors and the services of other professionals 
retained to assist in the preparation and filing of the form.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on staff analysis of the number of initial Form N-2 filings 
and post-effective amendments made during the three-year period from 
January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018, we adjusted the currently-
approved estimate of Form N-2 filings for purposes of this PRA 
analysis. Based on the three-year average of this adjusted number of 
Form N-2 filings, we currently estimate that there are 138 initial 
registration statements and 302 post-effective amendments to initial 
registration statements filed on Form N-2 annually.\439\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \439\ Based on staff analysis of the number of Form N-2 filings, 
the numbers of initial registration statement and post-effective 
amendments filed on Form N-2 were as follows: 129 initial Form N-2s 
and 290 post-effective amendments in calendar year 2016; 140 initial 
Form N-2s and 320 post-effective amendments in calendar year 2017; 
and 144 initial Form N-2s and 296 post-effective amendments in 
calendar year 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We anticipate that the proposed amendments to Form N-2 would, on 
net, decrease the information collection burdens of the form. Our 
estimates of the hour and cost burdens of the proposed amendments are 
based on several estimates and assumptions.
    First, we estimated the paperwork burdens of the proposed 
amendments that would increase the burdens of Form N-2. We expect that 
the proposed new checkbox requirements and undertakings would 
incrementally increase the paperwork burden on affected funds because 
affected funds would be required only to indicate which, if any, of the 
new checkboxes were applicable, and include the appropriate undertaking 
if one is required. Accordingly, we estimate that the proposed 
checkboxes and undertakings together would slightly increase the 
incremental paperwork burden of the form by 0.5 hours for an aggregate 
annual burden of 404 hours.\440\ The proposed amendment to require BDCs 
to include financial highlights disclosure would also result in an 
increase in the burdens associated with the form. However, we note that 
BDCs currently provide this information in their Form N-2 filings. 
Accordingly, we estimate the proposed financial highlights disclosure 
requirement would incrementally increase the paperwork burden by 1.5 
hours for an aggregate annual burden of 155 hours.\441\ We estimate 
that the proposed amendment to require funds to make available online 
its prospectus, SAI, and any Exchange Act reports that are incorporated 
by reference into the fund's prospectus or SAI would incrementally 
increase the paperwork burden of the form by 2 hours for an aggregate 
annual burden of 1,614 hours.\442\ In determining this estimate, we 
assumed that all eligible affected funds would take advantage of the 
incorporation by reference proposals and that the burdens of website 
posting of incorporated documents would be comparable to the burdens 
estimated for similar document posting requirements.\443\ Based on 
this, we estimate that these amendments would increase the aggregate 
annual burden of Form N-2 by 2,173 hours,\444\ and would result in an 
internal cost equivalent of $658,419.\445\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \440\ We calculated this estimate as follows: 807 (103 BDCs + 
704 registered CEFs) funds subject to the requirement x 0.5 hours. 
For convenience, the estimated burden has been rounded to the 
nearest whole number. Our estimate of costs and paperwork burdens 
that BDCs could incur may be over-estimates. See supra footnote 339 
and accompanying text.
    \441\ We calculated this estimate as follows: 103 BDCs subject 
to the requirement x 1.5 hours. For convenience, the estimated 
burden has been rounded to the nearest whole number.
    \442\ We calculated this estimate as follows: 807 (103 BDCs + 
704 registered CEFs) funds subject to the requirement x 2 hours.
    \443\ See, e.g., Variable Contract Summary Prospectus Proposing 
Release, supra footnote 172.
    \444\ We calculated this estimate as follows: 404 hours (see 
supra footnote 440) + 155 hours (see supra footnote 441) + 1,614 
hours (see supra footnote 442) = 2,173 hours.
    \445\ The internal time cost equivalent of $658,419 is 
calculated by multiplying the hour burden (2,173 hours) by the 
estimated hourly wage of $303. The estimated wage figure is based on 
published rates for Compliance Attorneys ($352), Senior Programmers 
($319), and Webmasters ($239). These hourly figures are from SIFMA's 
Management & Professional Earnings in the Securities Industry 2013, 
modified to account for an 1,800-hour work year; multiplied by 5.35 
to account for bonuses, firm size, employee benefits and overheard; 
and adjusted to account for the effects of inflation. The estimated 
wage rate was further based on the estimate that Compliance 
Attorneys, Senior Programmers, and Webmasters would divide time 
equally, resulting in a weighted wage rate of $303 (($352 + $319 + 
$239)/3 = $303.33).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We also estimated the paperwork burdens of the amendments that we 
anticipate would decrease the burdens of Form N-2. As we noted above, 
the proposal to permit the use of forward incorporation by reference 
would reduce the need for affected funds eligible to use the proposed 
short-form registration statement to file a post-effective amendment to 
update the registration statement. This would result in the filing of 
fewer post-effective amendments than under the current regulatory 
regime. Based on the staff's examination of Form N-2 filings during the 
three-year period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018, we 
estimate that approximately 544 (or 60%) of the post-effective 
amendments filed during this period were made to update information in 
the registration statement under the Securities Act.\446\ We estimate 
that 62% of affected funds (501 out of 807) would be eligible to use 
forward incorporation by reference under the proposed amendments. 
Consequently, we assumed that based on the number of affected funds 
that

[[Page 14503]]

would be eligible to forward incorporate under the proposed amendments, 
the number of post-effective amendments filed annually to update the 
registration statement under the Securities Act would be reduced by 62% 
or approximately 112 filings annually.\447\ For purposes of the PRA, we 
estimate that this would decrease the aggregate annual burden of Form 
N-2 by 11,984 hours and would result in a reduction in the cost burden 
for Form N-2 by $3,149,776.\448\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \446\ (290 post-effective amendments in 2016 + 320 post-
effective amendments in 2017 + 296 post-effective amendments in 2018 
= 906 post-effective amendments) x 60% = approximately 544 post-
effective amendments.
    \447\ We calculated this estimate as follows: (544 post-
effective amendments to update information in the registration 
statement under the Securities Act)/3 years = approximately 181 
post-effective amendments per year) x 62% = approximately 112 post-
effective amendments per year.
    \448\ We calculated these estimates as follows: 112 post-
effective amendments x 107 hours = 11,984 hours; 112 post-effective 
amendments x $28,123 = $3,149,776.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For purposes of the PRA, we estimate that the proposed amendments 
to Form N-2 would result in a net reduction of the annual paperwork 
burden by approximately 9,811 hours of internal personnel time \449\ 
and result in a reduction of the cost by approximately $2,491,357.\450\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \449\ We calculated this estimate as follows: Estimate of 
increased aggregate annual burden hours (+2,173 hours, see supra 
footnote 444) plus estimate of decreased aggregate annual burden 
hours (-11,984 hours, see supra footnote 448) = net decrease of 
9,811 hours.
    \450\ We calculated this estimate as follows: Estimate of 
internal cost equivalent associated with proposed amendments to Form 
N-2 ($658,419, see supra footnote 445) plus estimate of decreased 
cost burden associated with proposed amendment to Form N-2 
($3,149,776, see supra footnote 448) = net decrease of $2,491,357.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Proposed Structured Data Reporting Requirements
    We are proposing to amend Form N-2, as well as Regulation S-T,\451\ 
to require certain new structured data reporting requirements for 
registered CEFs and BDCs. Specifically, the proposed amendments would: 
\452\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \451\ 17 CFR 232.10 et seq. [OMB Control No. 3235-0424] (which 
specifies the requirements that govern the electronic submission of 
documents). Specifically, we are proposing to amend rule 405 of 
Regulation S-T. The additional collection of information burden that 
will result from the proposed amendments to rule 405 of Regulation 
S-T and to Form N-2, to require structured data reporting for 
affected funds, are included in our burden estimates for the 
``Investment Company Interactive Data'' collection of information, 
and do not impose any separate burden aside from that described in 
our discussion of the burden estimates for this collection of 
information.
    \452\ We are also proposing amendments to Form 24F-2 to require 
submission of this filing in a structured XML format. We discuss the 
PRA burdens of this proposal and other proposed amendments to the 
form below. See infra Part V.B.7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Require BDCs to submit financial statement information 
using Inline XBRL format; \453\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \453\ See supra Part II.H.1.a; see also proposed amendments to 
rule 405 of Regulation of S-T.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Require all affected funds to include structured cover 
page information in their registration statements on Form N-2 using 
Inline XBRL, including the tagging of the proposed new checkboxes to 
the cover page of Form N-2; \454\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \454\ See supra Part II.H.1.b; see also proposed General 
Instruction H.2.a to Form N-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Require all affected funds to tag certain Form N-2 
disclosure items using Inline XBRL.\455\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \455\ See supra Part II.H.1.c; see also proposed General 
Instruction H.2.a-c to Form N-2. The proposed amendments would 
require the following prospectus disclosure items be tagged using 
Inline XBRL: Fee Table; Senior Securities Table; Investment 
Objectives and Policies; Risk Factors; Share Price Data; and Capital 
Stock, Long-Term Debt, and Other Securities.
    A seasoned fund filing a short-form registration statement on 
Form N-2 also would be required to tag any information that is 
incorporated by reference from an Exchange Act report, such as those 
on Forms N-CSR, 10-K, or 8-K, in response to a disclosure item of 
the registration statement that is required to be tagged. See supra 
footnote 186 and accompanying text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Operating companies filing registration statements under the 
Securities Act or reports under the Exchange Act are required to submit 
the information from the financial statements accompanying their 
registration statements and reports in Inline XBRL format. BDCs are 
currently excluded from these Inline XBRL requirements. The Commission 
previously estimated that operating companies submitting financial 
information in Inline XBRL format file, on average, 4.5 responses per 
year that contain interactive data, and that each response required 54 
burden hours of internal time to prepare and cost $6,175 for outside 
services.\456\ The proposed amendments would subject BDCs to the same 
Inline XBRL reporting requirements. Therefore, we assume that BDCs 
would on average file the same number of filings containing financial 
statement information in Inline XBRL and would experience similar 
burden hours and costs as do operating companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \456\ See Inline XBRL Adopting Release, supra footnote 166, at 
40869. A recent survey suggests that these current burden estimates 
may be overstated with respect to smaller reporting companies. See 
American Institute of CPAs, XBRL Costs for Small Companies Have 
Declined 45%, According to AICPA Study (Aug. 18, 2018), available at 
https://www.aicpa.org/press/pressreleases/2018/xbrl-costs-have-declined-according-to-aicpa-study.html. Below, we request comment on 
whether our current PRA estimates continue to be appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed amendments to require affected funds to tag certain 
Form N-2 prospectus disclosure items using Inline XBRL largely parallel 
similar information required by Form N-1A risk/return summary that must 
be tagged in Inline XBRL format. We have previously estimated that 
mutual funds and ETFs file 1.36 responses per year containing mutual 
fund risk/return data in Inline XBRL format, and that the risk/return 
XBRL requirements require funds to expend 10.5 hours of internal time 
per response and cost $900 to purchase software and/or acquire the 
services of consultants or filing agents.\457\ Consequently, we assumed 
that the hour and cost burdens of the proposed requirements to tag 
certain Form N-2 disclosure items would be similar to the hour and cost 
burdens of risk/return summary XBRL requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \457\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have also made several adjustments to our burden estimates to 
reflect certain aspects of the proposed amendments that are distinct 
from the previous burden estimates of Inline XBRL requirements. We 
increased our estimate of the initial burden hours and costs of the 
proposed amendments to reflect one-time compliance costs. Because BDCs 
and registered CEFs have not previously been subject to Inline XBRL 
requirements, we assumed that these funds would experience additional 
burdens related to one-time costs associated with becoming familiarized 
with Inline XBRL reporting. These costs would include, for example, the 
acquisition of new software or the services of consultants, and the 
training of staff. We also assumed that these one-time costs would 
decline in the second and third year of compliance with the proposed 
amendments, under the premise that these funds should become more 
efficient at preparing submissions using Inline XBRL format as the 
process becomes more routine. We assumed that the one-time cost would 
result in a 50% incremental increase in the internal burdens and 
external costs of the financial information and risk/return summary 
XBRL requirements during the first year,\458\ and would subsequently 
decline in the second and third years by 75% from the immediately-
preceding year.\459\ Accordingly, we estimate the

[[Page 14504]]

burdens for the proposed amendment to require BDCs to submit financial 
the information in Inline XBRL format would be 65.81 hours of internal 
time \460\ and cost $7,525.78 for outside services,\461\ and we 
estimate the burdens for the proposed amendments to require affected 
funds to tag certain information that is required to be included in an 
affected fund's prospectus using Inline XBRL format would be 12.8 hours 
in internal time \462\ and cost $1,096.88 for outside services.\463\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \458\ Thus, for the proposed financial information XBRL 
requirement, we estimate that in the first year the one-time cost 
would be an additional 27 hours (54 x 0.5) and $3,087.5 in external 
costs ($6,175 x 0.5). For the proposed prospectus information XBRL 
requirements, we estimate the initial increase in burdens would be 
5.25 hours (10.5 x 0.5) and $450 in external costs ($900 x 0.5).
    \459\ Thus, we estimate that for the second year the one-time 
hour burden and cost of the proposed financial information XBRL 
requirement would be 6.75 hours (27 hours-(27 x 0.75 = 20.25 hours)) 
and $771.87 ($3,087.5-($3,087.5 x 0.75 = $2,315.63)). For the third 
year, we estimate that these hour burdens and costs would be 1.69 
hours (6.75 hours-(6.75 x 0.75 = 5.06 hours)) and $192.97 ($771.87-
($771.87 x 0.75 = $578.90)). Average yearly change in the initial 
one-time cost of the proposed financial information XBRL requirement 
would be (27 + 6.75 +1.69)/3 = 11.81 hours of internal in-house 
time, and ($3,087.5 + $771.87 + $192.97)/3 = $1,350.78 in external 
costs.
    For the second year, we estimate the one-time hour burden and 
cost of the proposed prospectus information XBRL requirements would 
be 1.31 hours (5.25 hours-(5.25 hours x 0.75 = approximately 3.94 
hours)) and $112.50 ($450-($450 x 0.75 = $337.5)). For the third 
year, we estimate that these hour burdens and costs would be 0.33 
hours (1.31 hours-(1.31 hours x 0.75 = 0.98 hours)) and $28.12 in 
external costs ($112.50-($112.50 x 0.75 = $84.38))). Average yearly 
change in the initial one-time cost of proposed prospectus 
information XBRL requirements would be (5.25 +1.31 +0.33)/3 = 2.3 
hours of internal in-house time, and ($450 + $112.50 + $28.12)/3 = 
$196.87 in external costs.
    \460\ This estimate was calculated as follows: 54 + 11.81 = 
65.81 hours.
    \461\ This estimate was calculated as follows: $6,175 + 1,350.78 
= $7,525.78.
    \462\ This estimate was calculated as follows: 10.5 + 2.3 = 12.8 
hours.
    \463\ This estimate was calculated as follows: $900 + 196.87 = 
$1,096.87.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We assumed that affected funds would submit a similar number of 
responses as the number of submitted responses that we currently 
estimate that contain mutual fund risk/return data in Inline XBRL. 
Currently, the mutual fund risk/return summary interactive data is 
required to be submitted with the Form N-1A (or a post-effective 
amendment thereto), a post-effective amendment under rule 485(b) of the 
Securities Act, or any form of prospectus filed under rule 497(c) or 
497(e) of the Securities Act. The Commission previously estimated that 
each mutual fund or ETF would submit one response containing Inline 
XBRL interactive data as an exhibit to a registration statement or a 
post-effective amendment thereto, and that 36% of these funds would 
submit an additional response containing Inline XBRL interactive data 
as an exhibit to a filing pursuant to rule 485(b) or rule 497. Under 
the proposed amendments, affected funds would be required to submit in 
Inline XBRL the specified Form N-2 disclosure items with their initial 
registration statement (or a post-effective amendment thereto), as well 
as any form of prospectus filed pursuant to rule 424(b) that reflects a 
substantive change to the specified Form N-2 disclosure items. In the 
case of a seasoned fund that files a short-form registration statement 
that incorporates by reference the specified Form N-2 disclosure items 
from an Exchange Act report, the interactive data would be required to 
be submitted with that Exchange Act report. We estimate that affected 
funds would similarly submit one response containing the Inline XBRL 
interactive data as an exhibit to a registration statement on Form N-2, 
a post-effective amendment thereto, or to an Exchange Act report, and 
that 36% of the affected funds would submit an additional response 
containing Inline XBRL interactive data as an exhibit to a filing 
pursuant to rule 424.
    We do not believe the cover page tagging proposal would result in 
significant additional burdens for affected funds. We have estimated 
that requiring operating companies to tag the cover pages of Forms 10-
K, 10-Q, 8-K, 20-F, and 40-F using Inline XBRL would result in an 
incremental increase in the collection burdens by one hour.\464\ 
Accordingly, we similarly estimate that the proposed amendment to 
require affected funds to tag Form N-2 cover page items would impose an 
increased paperwork burden of one hour.\465\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \464\ See FAST Act Modernization Adopting Release, supra 
footnote 177.
    \465\ We do not expect that this requirement would increase the 
cost for outside services because the cost of tagging the cover page 
by affected funds would be subsumed in the cost the submission of 
the Form N-2 disclosure items in Inline XBRL.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on these assumptions, we estimate the proposed amendments to 
require the submission of financial statement information in XBRL 
format would result in an aggregate yearly burden of approximately 
30,503 hours of in-house personnel time \466\ and $3,488,199 in the 
cost of services of outside professionals.\467\ We estimate that for 
all affected funds the proposed amendments to require the submission of 
specified Form N-2 disclosure items in Inline XBRL would result in an 
aggregate yearly burden of approximately 14,048 hours of in-house 
personnel time \468\ and $885,174 in the cost of services of outside 
professionals.\469\ We estimate that the proposed amendment to require 
the tagging of Form N-2 cover page items would result in an aggregate 
yearly burden of approximately 807 hours of in-house personnel 
time.\470\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \466\ For BDCs we calculated our internal hour estimate as 
follows: 103 BDCs x 65.81 hours x 4.5 responses per year = 
approximately 30,502.94 burden hours per year. For convenience, the 
estimated burden has been rounded to the nearest whole number.
    \467\ 103 BDCs subject to the requirements x 4.5 responses per 
year x $7,525.78 = $3,488,199.03.
    \468\ We calculated this estimate as follows: 807 affected funds 
x 12.8 hours x 1.36 responses per year = 14,048.26 burden hours per 
year. For convenience, the estimated burden has been rounded to the 
nearest whole number.
    \469\ 807 affected funds x $1,096.87 = $885,174.09.
    \470\ 807 affected funds x 1 hour = 807 hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Proposed New Annual Reporting Requirements Under Rule 30e-1 and 
Exchange Act Periodic Reporting Requirements for BDCs
    Several of the offering reforms that we are proposing, such as the 
amendments that would allow certain affected funds to use an automatic 
shelf registration statement or to forward incorporate by reference 
Exchange Act reports, may raise the importance of an affected fund's 
Exchange Act reports to investors.\471\ In light of this, we are 
proposing new disclosure requirements for affected funds' annual 
reports. Specifically, we are proposing to amend:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \471\ See supra Part II.H.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Form N-2 to require affected funds using the proposed 
short-form registration statement to disclose in their annual reports a 
fee and expense table, share price data, a senior securities table, and 
unresolved staff comments regarding the fund's periodic or current 
reports or registration statement; \472\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \472\ See supra Part II.H.2.a; see also proposed Instruction 
4.h(ii) to Item 24 of Form N-2 (fee and expense table); Proposed 
Instruction 4.h(iii) to Item 24 of Form N-2 (share price data); 
Proposed Instruction 4.h(i) to Item 24 of Form N-2 (senior 
securities table). In connection with this proposal, we are also 
proposing to eliminate the requirement that affected funds disclose 
the average commission rate paid in their financial highlights 
disclosure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Form N-2 to require registered CEFs to provide MDFP in 
their annual reports; \473\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \473\ See supra Part II.H.2.b; see also proposed Instruction 4.g 
to Item 24 of Form N-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Form N-2 to require BDCs to include financial highlights 
in their annual reports on Form 10-K; \474\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \474\ See supra Part II.H.2.c; see also proposed revisions to 
Instruction 1 to Item 4 of Form N-2. As discussed above, BDCs also 
would be required to include financial highlights in their 
registration statements on Form N-2. See supra Part V.B.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Rule 8b-16 to require registered CEFs to describe certain 
changes in enough detail to allow investors to understand each change 
and how it may affect the fund.\475\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \475\ See supra Part II.H.5; see also proposed rule 8b-16(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The collection of information burdens under the proposed amendments 
correspond to information collections

[[Page 14505]]

under rule 30e-1 for registered CEFs and Form 10-K for BDCs. Rule 30e-1 
generally requires registered investment companies to transmit to their 
shareholders, at least semi-annually, reports containing the 
information that is required to be included in such reports by the 
fund's registration statement form under the Investment Company Act. 
BDCs, like operating companies, are required to file annual reports on 
Form 10-K pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. We 
currently estimate that it takes approximately 88 hours and costs 
$31,061 per registered investment company to comply with the collection 
of information associated with rule 30e-1.\476\ For Form 10-K, we 
currently estimate that it takes each operating company approximately 
1,747 hours and costs approximately $233,044 to comply with the 
collection of information associated with Form 10-K.\477\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \476\ These estimates are based on the last time the rule's 
information collections were approved, pursuant to a submission for 
a PRA extension in 2016. The estimated aggregate annual hour and 
cost burden of rule 30e-1 is approximately 1,043,592 hours and 
$368,352,399.
    \477\ These estimates are based on the last time the form's 
information collections were approved, pursuant to a submission for 
a PRA extension in 2018. The estimated aggregate annual hour and 
cost burden of Form 10-K is approximately 14,217,344 hours and 
$1,896,280,869.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate that the proposed amendments to require affected funds 
filing a short-form registration statement to disclose fee and expense 
table, share price data, a senior securities table, and unresolved 
staff comments would incrementally increase the compliance burden on 
these funds. However, because current disclosure requirements of Form 
N-2 already require affected funds to disclose the fee and expense 
table, share price data, and a senior securities table--and because 
disclosure of unresolved staff comments would simply be a restatement 
of comments provided to these funds by the staff--we believe these 
disclosures should not impose significant new burdens. Accordingly, we 
estimate that the proposed amendments would incrementally increase the 
paperwork burden associated with rule 30e-1 and Form 10-K by 3 hours 
per affected fund that would be eligible to use the short-form 
registration statement.
    Regarding the proposed amendments to require registered CEFs 
disclose in their annual reports MDFP and any material changes in their 
investment objectives or policies that have not been approved by 
shareholders, we believe these additional disclosures would increase 
the paperwork burden associated with rule 30e-1 for registered CEFs. 
For example, MDFP requires, among other things, narrative disclosure 
about the factors that materially affected a fund's performance during 
its most recently completed fiscal year, as well as the impact on the 
fund and its shareholders of policies and practices that the fund may 
use to maintain a certain level of distributions. We estimate that the 
proposed amendment to require MDFP would incrementally increase the 
paperwork burden associated with rule 30e-1 by 16 hours and that the 
proposed amendment to require disclosure of any material changes in 
investment objectives or policies that were not approved by 
shareholders would incrementally increase the paperwork burden 
associated with rule 30e-1 by 4 hours.
    Regarding the proposed amendments to require BDCs to disclose 
financial highlights information in their registration statements and 
annual reports, we estimate that this proposed amendment would 
incrementally increase in the paperwork burden associated with Form 10-
K. As we noted above in our PRA analysis of this proposed amendment on 
Form N-2, BDCs currently provide this information. Accordingly, we 
estimate the proposed amendment would incrementally increase the 
paperwork burden associated with Form 10-K by 1.5 hours.
    For purposes of the PRA, we estimate the proposed amendments would 
result in 284 hours of additional total incremental burden under Form 
10-K \478\ and 15,451 hours of total incremental burden under rule 30e-
1.\479\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \478\ For BDCs we calculated the total incremental burden as 
follows: (43 BDCs eligible to use the short-form registration 
statement x 3 hours = 129 hours) + (103 BDCs x 1.5 hours = 154.5 
hours) = 283.5 burden hours. For convenience, the estimated burden 
has been rounded to the nearest whole number.
    \479\ For registered CEFs we calculated the total incremental 
burden as follows: (457 registered CEFs eligible to use the short-
form registration statement x 3 hours = 1,371 hours) + (704 
registered CEFs required to disclose MDFP and material changes in 
investment policies x 20 hours = 14,080 hours) = 15,451 burden 
hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In connection with our estimate of the total incremental burden of 
the proposed amendments, we have allocated a portion of those burdens 
as costs. Based on consultations with operating companies, law firms, 
fund representatives and other persons who regularly assist funds in 
preparing and filing reports with the Commission, the staff estimates 
that 75% of the burden of preparing annual reports under rule 30e-1 and 
on Form 10-K is undertaken by the fund internally and that 25% of the 
burden is undertaken by outside professionals, such as outside counsel 
and independent auditors, retained by the fund at an average cost of 
$400 per hour.\480\ Accordingly, we estimate for purposes of the PRA 
that the total incremental burden for Form 10-K under the proposed 
amendments would be 213 hours for internal time (284 total incremental 
burden hours x 0.75) and $28,400 (284 total incremental burden hours x 
0.25 x $400) for the services of outside professionals. We further 
estimate for purposes of the PRA that the total incremental burden for 
rule 30e-1 would be 11,588 hours for internal time (15,451 total 
incremental burden hours x 0.75) and $1,545,100 (15,451 total 
incremental burden hours x 0.25 x $400) for the services of outside 
professionals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \480\ We recognize that the costs of retaining outside 
professionals may vary depending on the nature of the professional 
services, but for purposes of this PRA analysis, we estimate that 
such costs would be an average of $400 per hour. This estimate is 
based on discussions the staff has had with several law and 
accounting firms to estimate an hourly rate of $400 as the cost to 
operating companies and funds for the services of outside 
professionals retained to assist in the preparation of these 
filings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. Securities Offering Communications
    Rule 163 permits WKSIs to make unrestricted oral and written offers 
before filing a registration statement, but any written offer will be 
considered a free writing prospectus and will generally have to be 
filed upon filing a registration statement or amendment covering the 
securities. Rule 433 governs the use of free writing prospectuses by 
WKSIs and non-WKSI issuers after the filing of a registration 
statement. A free writing prospectus used by or on behalf of an 
affected fund, or free writing prospectuses that are broadly 
disseminated by another offering participant, are required to be filed 
with the Commission. We are proposing amendments to rules 163 and 433 
that would permit affected funds to rely on these rules to use a free 
writing prospectus.
    We calculated our burden estimate for the proposed amendments to 
rule 163 based on several assumptions. First, we assumed that the 
burden of filing a free writing prospectus by an affected fund would be 
the same 0.25 burden hours for filing the document as we estimate 
operating companies incur.\481\ Second, we assumed that only a limited 
number of affected funds that would qualify as a WKSI would rely on 
rule 163 to use

[[Page 14506]]

free writing prospectuses.\482\ In connection with our estimate of the 
burden hours of the proposed amendment to rule 163, we have allocated a 
portion of those burdens as costs. We estimate that 25% of the burden 
of preparing and filing a free writing prospectus pursuant to rule 163 
is undertaken by the issuer internally and that 75% of the burden is 
undertaken by outside professionals retained by the issuer at an 
average cost of $400 per hour.\483\ Accordingly, we estimate that for 
purposes of the PRA the total incremental burden for the proposed 
amendments to rule 163 would be approximately 0.125 hours \484\ and 
$150 for the services of outside professionals.\485\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \481\ These estimates are based on the last time the rule's 
information collections were approved, pursuant to a submission for 
a PRA extension in 2017.
    \482\ For a number of reasons, many issuers that are currently 
eligible to be WKSIs do not make use of free writing prospectuses in 
reliance on rule 163. At the time the Commission adopted rule 163, 
it estimated that 53 free writing prospectuses would be filed under 
rule 163 per year. However, during the Commission's 2017 fiscal 
year, only 10 free writing prospectuses in reliance on rule 163 were 
filed with the Commission. We estimate that 104 affected funds would 
be eligible to be WKSIs. If current practices regarding the use of 
free writing prospectus under rule 163 continue with respect to 
affected funds, we do not believe that these affected funds would 
significantly increase the number of free writing prospectuses under 
rule 163. Accordingly, we estimate that, on average, affected funds 
that are eligible to be WKSIs would file 2 free writing prospectuses 
under the proposed amendments to rule 163 each year.
    \483\ The staff estimates an hourly cost of $400 per hour for 
the service of outside professionals based on consultations with 
several issuers and law firms and other persons who regularly assist 
issuers in preparing and filing documents with the Commission.
    \484\ We calculated this estimate as follows: (2 free writing 
prospectuses filed per year x 0.25 hours per response) x 0.25 
allocation of time = 0.125 hours.
    \485\ We calculated this estimate as follows: (2 free writing 
prospectuses filed per year x 0.25 hours per response) x 0.75 
allocation of time x $400 = $150. This estimate includes the cost of 
outside counsel, filing agents and the services of other 
professionals retained to assist in the preparation and filing of 
the document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to the burdens of the proposed amendments to rule 433, 
we assumed that the burden of filing a free writing prospectus by an 
affected fund would be the same 1.28 burden hours for filing the 
document as we estimate operating companies incur.\486\ Second, we 
assumed that an affected fund would, on average, file a similar number 
of free writing prospectuses under rule 433 per year that an operating 
company files on average annually.\487\ For purposes of the PRA, we 
estimate that affected funds would annually file approximately 4,360 
free writing prospectuses under rule 433.\488\ However, the extent to 
which affected funds would adopt the use of free writing prospectuses 
under the proposed amendments to rule 433 is uncertain. Affected funds' 
current communications under rule 482 of the Securities Act may be 
similar to free writing prospectuses that could be used in reliance on 
the proposed amendments to rule 433, and funds could continue to rely 
on rule 482 to engage in post-filing communications if the Commission 
were to adopt the proposed amendments to rule 433.\489\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \486\ These estimates are based on the last time the rule's 
information collections were approved, pursuant to a submission for 
a PRA extension in 2017. The burden hours for preparing and filing a 
rule 433 free writing prospectus are greater than the burdens under 
rule 163 because certain conditions to the use of a free writing 
prospectus under rule 433 require the free writing prospectus to 
contain more information than rule 163 requires.
    \487\ The most recent data that we have available shows that 
each operating company files an average of approximately 5.4 free 
writing prospectuses per year.
    \488\ We calculated this estimate as follows: 5.4 free writing 
prospectuses x 807 affected funds = 4,360 free writing prospectuses 
(rounded to the nearest whole number).
    \489\ We note there that certain communications that are 
currently treated as affected funds' rule 482 advertisements could 
fall under the rule 138 safe harbor for research reports, as 
proposed, or the free writing prospectus rules, rules 164 and 433, 
as proposed. See supra Parts IV.B.2 and IV.C.1. This could result in 
a reduction in the information collection burdens for rule 482 if 
fewer materials are filed. In connection with the extension of a 
currently approved collection for rule 482, the Commission will 
adjust the burdens associated with these collections of information 
to reflect these changes, as appropriate. At this time, we are 
requesting comments regarding the overall burden estimates for the 
proposed rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Similar to our calculation of the burden estimates for rule 163, we 
have also allocated a portion of our burden estimates for rule 433 
burdens as costs. We estimate that 25% of the burden of preparing and 
filing a free writing prospectus pursuant to rule 433 is undertaken by 
the issuer internally and that 75% of the burden is undertaken by 
outside professionals retained by the issuer at an average cost of $400 
per hour. For purposes of the PRA, we estimate that the annual 
paperwork burden for affected funds under the proposed amendments to 
rule 433 would be approximately 1,395 hours \490\ of internal personnel 
time and a cost of approximately $1,674,240 for the services of outside 
professionals.\491\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \490\ We calculated this estimate as follows: (4,360 free 
writing prospectuses filed per year x 1.28 hours per response) x 
0.25 allocation of time = 1,395 hours (rounded to the nearest whole 
number).
    \491\ We calculated this estimate as follows: (4,360 free 
writing prospectuses filed per year x 1.28 hours per response) x 
0.75 allocation of time x $400 = $1,674,240 (rounded to the nearest 
whole number). This estimate includes the cost of outside counsel, 
filing agents and the services of other professionals retained to 
assist in the preparation and filing of the document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

5. Prospectus Delivery Requirements
    Rule 173 requires an issuer to, if applicable, provide a notice to 
purchasers stating that a sale of securities was made based on a 
registration statement or in a transaction in which a final prospectus 
would have been required to have been delivered in the absence of rule 
172.\492\ We are proposing to amend this rule to make it applicable to 
affected funds.\493\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \492\ Rule 172 allows issuers, brokers, and dealers to satisfy 
final prospectus delivery obligations if a final prospectus is or 
will be on file with the Commission within the time required by the 
rules and other conditions are satisfied. Rule 173 requires a notice 
stating that a sale of securities was made pursuant to a 
registration statement or in a transaction in which a final 
prospectus would have been required to have been delivered in the 
absence of rule 172.
    \493\ See supra Part II.D.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For purposes of the PRA, we estimate that the annual incremental 
paperwork burden for affected funds under the proposed amendments to 
rule 173 would be 586,865 burden hours.\494\ In deriving our estimate, 
we assumed that: (1) There would be 807 affected funds that would 
become subject to rule 173 under the proposed amendments; \495\ (2) 
each of these affected funds would incur the same 0.0167 average burden 
hours per response as we estimate operating companies subject to rule 
173 do; and (3) each of these affected funds would provide, on average, 
43,546 responses per year, as we estimate operating companies subject 
to rule 173 do.\496\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \494\ 807 affected funds subject to rule 173 x 43,546 responses 
per affected fund x 0.0167 burden hours per response = approximately 
586,865 burden hours per year. For convenience, the estimated burden 
has been rounded to the nearest whole number.
    \495\ See supra Part IV.A.1.
    \496\ These estimates are based on the last time the rule's 
information collections were approved, pursuant to a submission for 
a PRA extension in 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

6. Proposed Form 8-K Reporting Requirements
    We are proposing amendments to require registered CEFs to report 
information on Form 8-K.\497\ We are also proposing to amend Form 8-K 
to add two new reporting items for affected funds, and to revise 
several existing reporting instructions to the form to tailor these 
requirements to affected funds.\498\ Under the proposed new reporting 
items, an affected fund would be required to file a report on Form 8-K 
if the fund has: (1) A material change to its investment objectives or 
policies; or (2) a material write-down in fair value of a significant 
investment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \497\ See supra Part II.H.3.
    \498\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    First, we estimated the average number of Form 8-K filings an 
affected fund would make annually. Based on an analysis of Form 8-K 
filings over a three-year period from June 1, 2015 to May 31, 2018, the 
staff estimates that

[[Page 14507]]

BDCs file an average of 10 Form 8-Ks annually.\499\ We assumed that 
registered CEFs would make, on average, the same number of Form 8-K 
filings per year. Further, we estimate that the proposed new Form 8-K 
reporting items for affected funds would, on average, result in 
affected funds filing one more report on Form 8-K per year. 
Accordingly, we estimate that registered CEFs would make, on average, 
11 Form 8-K filings per year under the proposed amendments,\500\ and 
BDCs would make, on average, 1 additional Form 8-K filing per year 
under the proposed amendments. Thus, we estimate an additional 7,744 
filings by registered CEFs and an additional 103 filings by BDCs per 
year on Form 8-K under the proposed amendments, for an aggregate of 
7,847 additional filings on Form 8-K.\501\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \499\ See supra footnote 415.
    \500\ While registered CEFs are currently required to use Form 
8-K to file notice of a blackout period under rule 104 of Regulation 
BTR, it is very rare for registered CEFs to trigger this existing 
reporting requirement. It is similarly rare for BDCs to file notice 
of a blackout period on Form 8-K. See supra footnote 247. Thus, we 
have allocated all of the estimated 11 annual Form 8-K filings by 
registered CEFs to the proposed amendments rather than existing 
regulatory requirements.
    \501\ 11 additional filings by a registered CEF x 704 registered 
CEFs = 7,744 filings by registered CEFs. 1 additional filing by a 
BDC x 103 BDCs = 103 filings by BDCs. 7,744 filings by registered 
CEFs + 103 filings by BDCs = 7,847 filings total. Our estimate of 
costs and paperwork burdens that registered CEFs could incur may be 
over-estimates. See supra footnote 341.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Second, we assumed that, on average, completing and filing a Form 
8-K that would be required under the new disclosure items would require 
the same amount of time completing and filing a Form 8-K under many of 
the current disclosure items required by the form--approximately 5 
hours.\502\ However, because registered CEFs are not currently required 
to file Form 8-K reports, we adjusted the estimated average amount of 
time it would take a registered CEF to prepare and file a Form 8-K. We 
assumed that the first-year burden for registered CEFs would be greater 
than that for subsequent years, as a portion of the burdens will 
reflect one-time expenditures associated with complying with the new 
reporting requirements, such as implementing new processes for the 
preparation and collection of information, and training staff. We 
adjusted the second- and third-year estimates to account for the fact 
that the preparation and collection process should become more 
routine.\503\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \502\ This estimate is based on prior approved revisions to the 
Form 8-K collection requirement in connection with final Commission 
rules that adopted similar Form 8-K requirements.
    \503\ We increased the first-year estimate by an additional 
three hours to reflect these one-time expenditures. We assumed the 
estimated burden increase in the second and third years would 
decline by 75% from the immediately-preceding year, with an 
estimated burden increase of 0.75 hours in the second year (3 hours-
(3 hours x 0.75)) and an estimated burden increase of 0.1875 hours 
in the third year (0.75 hours-(0.75 hours x 0.75)). As a result, we 
estimate a first-year burden of 8 hours, a second-year burden of 
5.75 hours, and a third-year burden of 5.1875 hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Under these assumptions, we estimate that the average amount of 
time it would take a registered CEF to prepare and file a Form 8-K 
would be 6.3125 hours per filing.\504\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \504\ For registered CEFs we calculated this estimate as 
follows: (8 hours + 5.75 hours + 5.1875 hours)/3 = 6.3125 burden 
hours per filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For purposes of the PRA, we estimate the total annual incremental 
burden of our proposed amendments to Form 8-K is 48,884 hours for 
registered CEFs \505\ and 515 burden hours for BDCs,\506\ for a total 
of 49,399 burden hours.\507\ For Form 8-K, we estimate that 75% of the 
burden of preparation is carried by the company internally and that 25% 
of the burden of preparation is carried by outside professionals, such 
as outside counsel, independent auditors and filing agents retained by 
the fund at an average cost of $400 per hour. Thus, the annual 
incremental paperwork burden for registered CEFs to prepare and file 
Form 8-K under the proposed amendments would be approximately 36,663 
burden hours of internal time and a cost of approximately $4,888,400 
for the services of outside professionals.\508\ We estimate that the 
incremental paperwork burden for BDCs would be 386.25 hours of internal 
time and a cost of approximately $51,500 for the services of outside 
professionals.\509\ In total, we estimate that the incremental 
paperwork burden for all affected funds to prepare and file Form 8-K 
under the proposed amendments would be approximately 37,049.25 burden 
hours of internal time \510\ and a cost of approximately $4,939,900 for 
the services of outside professionals.\511\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \505\ 7,744 filings by registered CEFs x 6.3125 burden hours = 
48,884 total burden hours for registered CEFs.
    \506\ 103 filings by BDCs x 5 burden hours = 515 total burden 
hours for BDCs.
    \507\ 48,884 total burden hours for registered CEFs + 515 total 
burden hours for BDCs = 49,399 total burden hours for affected 
funds.
    \508\ 48,884 total burden hours for registered CEFs x 0.75 = 
36,663 burden hours of internal time. 48,884 total burden hours for 
registered CEFs x 0.25 x $400 = $4,888,400 for services of outside 
professionals.
    \509\ 515 total burden hours for BDCs x 0.75 = 386.25 burden 
hours of internal time. 515 total burden hours for BDCs x 0.25 x 
$400 = $51,500 for services of outside professionals.
    \510\ 36,663 burden hours of internal time for registered CEFs + 
386.25 burden hours of internal time for BDCs = 37,049.25 burden 
hours of internal time for affected funds.
    \511\ $4,888,400 for services of outside professionals for 
registered CEFs + $51,500 for services of outside professionals for 
BDCs = $4,939,900 for services of outside professionals for affected 
funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

7. Form 24F-2
    Rule 24f-2 requires any open-end management company, unit 
investment trust, or face-amount certificate company deemed to have 
registered an indefinite amount of securities to file a Form 24F-2 not 
later than 90 days after the end of any fiscal year in which it has 
publicly offered such securities. Form 24F-2 is the annual notice of 
securities sold by these funds that accompanies the payment of 
registration fees with respect to the securities sold during the fiscal 
year. We are proposing to amend rules 23c-3 and 24f-2 so that interval 
funds would pay registration fees on the same annual basis using Form 
24F-2. We are also proposing to require funds to submit reports on Form 
24F-2 in a structured data format.
    The Commission has previously estimated that approximately 6,120 
funds file Form 24F-2 annually.\512\ The current estimated annual 
internal hour burden per fund of filing Form 24F-2 is two hours of 
clerical time, with an estimated total annual burden for all 
respondents of 12,240 hours. At an estimated wage rate of $67 per hour, 
the annual cost per respondent of this burden is estimated at $134, and 
the total annual cost for all respondents is $820,080. We estimate that 
an additional 57 funds would file Form 24F-2 annually under the 
proposed amendments.\513\ In addition, we estimate that the requirement 
to submit filings of Form 24F-2 in a structured data format would 
increase the annual internal hour burden by two hours per respondent. 
At an estimated wage rate of $261 per programmer hour, we estimate that 
the annual cost per respondent of this additional burden is about $522 
per year.\514\ Accordingly, we estimate that the annual internal hour 
burden to file Form 24F-2 under the proposed amendments would be about

[[Page 14508]]

24,708 hours,\515\ at a corresponding internal cost of about $4.1 
million.\516\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \512\ This estimate is was previously submitted to OMB in 
connection with the renewal of approval for the collection of 
information required by Form 24F-2 in 2018.
    \513\ See supra Part IV.A.1 (estimating that there were 57 
interval funds as of September 30, 2018).
    \514\ 2 hours additional burden per fund per year x $261 per 
hour = $522 per fund per year.
    \515\ (2 hours current burden per fund per year + 2 hours for 
structured data format per fund per year) x (6,120 current funds + 
57 interval funds) = 4 burden hours per fund per year x 6,177 funds 
= 24,708 hours per year.
    \516\ ((2 hours current burden per fund per year x $67 per hour) 
+ (2 hours for structured data format per fund per year x $261 per 
hour)) x 6,177 funds = ($134 per fund per year + $522 per fund per 
year) x 6,177 funds = $656 per fund per year x 6,177 funds = 
$4,052,112 per year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Request for Comments

    We request comment on whether our estimates for burden hours and 
any external costs as described above are reasonable. Consistent with 
44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(B), the Commission solicits comments in order to: 
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed collections of information are 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the 
Commission, including whether the information will have practical 
utility; (2) evaluate the accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collections of information; (3) determine 
whether there are ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of 
the information to be collected; and (4) determine whether there are 
ways to minimize the burden of the collections of information on those 
who are to respond, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology.
    In addition to these general requests for comment, we also request 
comment specifically on the following issues:
     Our analysis relies upon certain assumptions, as discussed 
above. Do commenters agree with these assumptions, including 
assumptions about burdens in the initial year of compliance compared to 
subsequent years (for example, the estimated burden for a registered 
CEF to prepare and file Form 8-K in the initial and subsequent years of 
compliance under the proposed rules)?
     Are the current burden estimates associated with the 
requirement to submit financial statements and notes in an XBRL still 
accurate? Have the burdens of preparing this information changed over 
time, particularly for smaller reporting companies?
    The agency has submitted the proposed collection of information to 
OMB for approval. Persons wishing to submit comments on the collection 
of information requirements of the proposed amendments should direct 
them to the Office of Management and Budget, Attention Desk Officer for 
the Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC 20503, and should send a copy to 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20549-1090, with reference to File No. S7-03-19. OMB is 
required to make a decision concerning the collections of information 
between 30 and 60 days after publication of this release. Requests for 
materials submitted to OMB by the Commission with regard to these 
collections of information should be in writing, refer to File No. S7-
03-19, and be submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission, 
Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-2736.

VI. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis

    This Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (``IRFA'') has been 
prepared in accordance with section 3 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act 
(``RFA'').\517\ It relates to proposed modifications to the 
registration, communications, and offering processes for affected funds 
under the Securities Act that would allow affected funds to use the 
securities offering rules that are already available to operating 
companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \517\ 5 U.S.C. 603.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Reasons for and Objectives of the Proposed Actions

    The BDC Act directs us to allow a BDC to use the securities 
offering rules that are available to other issuers required to file 
reports under section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Exchange Act and 
specifically enumerates the required revisions. Similarly, the 
Registered CEF Act directs us to allow any listed registered CEF or 
interval fund to use the securities offering rules that are available 
to other issuers that are required to file reports under section 13(a) 
or section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, subject to appropriate 
conditions.\518\ Pursuant to both Acts, we are proposing rule and form 
amendments that would modify the registration, communications, and 
offering processes for affected funds to allow them to use the 
securities offering rules that are available to other issuers required 
to file reports under section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Exchange 
Act. We are also proposing discretionary rule amendments to tailor the 
disclosure and regulatory framework for affected funds, in light of the 
proposed amendments to the offering rules applicable to them. The 
reasons for, and objectives of, the proposed rules are further 
discussed in more detail in Part II above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \518\ As discussed above, we propose to apply the proposed rules 
to all registered CEFs (and BDCs), which certain conditions and 
exceptions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Legal Basis

    The Commission is proposing the rules and forms contained in this 
document under the authority set forth in the Securities Act, 
particularly Sections 6, 7, 8, 10, 19, 27A, and 28 thereof [15 U.S.C. 
77a et seq.]; the Exchange Act, particularly Sections 2, 3(b), 9(a), 
10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17(a), 21E, 23(a), 35A, and 36 thereof [15 U.S.C. 
78a et seq.]; the Investment Company Act, particularly Sections 6(c), 
8, 20(a), 23, 24, 29, 30, 31, 37, and 38 thereof [15 U.S.C. 80a et 
seq.]; the BDC Act, particularly Section 803(b) thereof [Pub. L. No. 
115-141, title VIII]; and the Registered CEF Act, particularly Section 
509(a) thereof [Pub. L. No. 115-174].

C. Small Entities Subject to the Rule

    An investment company is a small entity if, together with other 
investment companies in the same group of related investment companies, 
it has net assets of $50 million or less as of the end of its most 
recent fiscal year.\519\ Commission staff estimates that, as of June 
2018, 19 BDCs and 32 registered CEFs are small entities.\520\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \519\ 17 CFR 270.0-10(a).
    \520\ These estimates, reflecting the net assets of registered 
CEFs and of BDCs, are based on staff review of Forms N-CEN and N-Q 
filed with the Commission as of June 2018 and are based on the 
definition of small entity under rule 0-10 of the Investment Company 
Act [17 CFR 270.0-10]. Such funds would not necessarily be able to 
meet the transaction requirement to qualify to file a short-form 
registration statement on Form N-2 (i.e., generally those affected 
funds with a public float of $75 million) or to be a WKSI (i.e., 
generally those affected funds with a public float of $700 million). 
See supra Part II.B.2.a and II.C.
    Based on data from Morningstar Direct as of June 2018, of the 19 
BDCs that are small entities, 3 were traded on an exchange with 
market capitalization below the $75 million public float threshold 
for qualifying to file a short-form registration statement on Form 
N-2. Likewise, of the 32 registered CEFs that qualified as small 
entities, 3 traded on an exchange with market capitalizations below 
this same $75 million threshold; while 2 were traded on the over-
the-counter (OTC) market with market capitalizations below $75 
million.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A broker-dealer is a small entity if it has total capital (net 
worth plus subordinated liabilities) of less than $500,000 on the date 
in the prior fiscal year as of which its audited financial statements 
were prepared pursuant to Sec.  240.17a-5(d),\521\ and it is not 
affiliated with any person (other than a natural person) that is not a 
small business or

[[Page 14509]]

small organization.\522\ Commission staff estimates that, as of 
December 31, 2018, there are approximately 996 broker-dealers that may 
be considered small entities.\523\ To the extent a small broker-dealer 
participates in a securities offering or prepares research reports, it 
may be affected by our proposals. Generally, we believe larger broker-
dealers engage in these activities, but we request comment on whether 
and how these proposals would affect small broker-dealers.\524\ We also 
request comment on the number of small entities that would be affected 
by our proposal, including any available empirical data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \521\ See rule 0-10(c)(1) under the Exchange Act [17 CFR 240.0-
10(c)(1)]. Alternatively, if a broker-dealer is ``not required to 
file such statements, a broker or dealer that had total capital (net 
worth plus subordinated liabilities) of less than $500,000 on the 
last business day of the preceding fiscal year (or in the time that 
it has been in business, if shorter).'' See id.
    \522\ See rule 0-10(c)(2) under the Exchange Act [17 CFR 240.0-
10(c)(2)].
    \523\ This estimate is derived from an analysis of data for the 
period ending Dec. 31, 2018 obtained from Financial and Operational 
Combined Uniform Single (FOCUS) Reports that broker-dealers 
generally are required to file with the Commission and/or SROs 
pursuant to rule 17a-5 under the Exchange Act [17 CFR 240.17a-5].
    \524\ See Securities Offering Reform Adopting Release, supra 
footnote 5, at 44797. See also CIFRR Adopting Release, supra 
footnote 98, at 64219.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

D. Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance 
Requirements

    The proposed amendments would create, amend, or eliminate current 
requirements for affected funds and broker-dealers, including those 
that are small entities discussed in Part VI.C above.\525\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \525\ See also supra Part V (discussing the skills necessary to 
perform the recordkeeping, reporting, and compliance requirements of 
the proposed rules and form amendments, including those to be 
performed internally by a fund, and those to be performed externally 
by professionals). The PRA provides for the hours, costs, and skill 
level associated with preparing disclosures, filing forms, and 
retaining records in compliance with our proposed rules. These 
skills would apply for compliance with the proposed rules by all 
funds, large and small, and Commission staff further estimates that 
small funds will incur approximately the same initial and ongoing 
costs as large funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Registration Process and Final Prospectus Delivery
    The proposed amendments to the registration process for affected 
funds would create a short-form registration statement on Form N-2 that 
will function like a registration statement filed on Form S-3.\526\ An 
affected fund eligible to file this short-form registration statement 
could use it to register shelf offerings, including shelf registration 
statements (filed by a WKSI) that become effective automatically.\527\ 
Such a fund also could satisfy Form N-2's disclosure requirement by 
incorporating by reference information from the fund's Exchange Act 
reports.\528\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \526\ See supra Part II.B.2.a.
    \527\ Id.
    \528\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, we are proposing amendments to allow certain affected 
funds eligible to register a primary offering under the proposed short-
form registration instruction to rely on rule 430B to omit information 
from their base prospectuses, and to permit affected funds to use the 
process operating companies follow to file prospectus supplements.\529\ 
Affected funds that choose to forward incorporate information by 
reference into their registration statements, as proposed, would also 
be able to include additional information in their periodic reports 
that is not required to be included in these reports in order to update 
their registration statements.\530\ A fund would be able to include 
this additional information if the fund includes a statement in the 
report identifying information that it has included for this 
purpose.\531\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \529\ See supra Part II.B.2.b.
    \530\ See supra Part II.B.2.c.
    \531\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed amendments to the WKSI definition in rule 405 would 
also permit affected funds to qualify for enhanced offering and 
communication benefits under our rules.\532\ In order for an issuer to 
qualify as a WKSI, the issuer must meet the registrant requirements of 
Form S-3, i.e., it must be ``seasoned,'' and generally must have at 
least $700 million in public float.\533\ Qualifying as a WKSI would 
allow such funds to file a registration statement or amendment that 
becomes effective automatically in a broader variety of contexts than 
non-WKSIs, and to communicate at any time, including through a free 
writing prospectus, without violating the ``gun-jumping'' provisions of 
the Securities Act.\534\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \532\ See supra Part II.C.
    \533\ Id.
    \534\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Smaller affected funds would not be able to avail themselves of the 
aspects of the proposed rule amendments streamlining the registration 
process for affected funds or that make available the WKSI designation 
to affected funds. The proposed short-form registration instruction is 
designed to provide affected funds parity with operating companies by 
permitting them to use the instruction to register the same 
transactions that an operating company can register on Form S-3.\535\ 
In order to qualify to use the short-form registration statement under 
Form N-2, General Instruction A.2 of Form N-2 generally requires an 
affected fund to meet the public float requirement of $75 million under 
the transaction requirements for Form S-3.\536\ Likewise, the WKSI 
provision of rule 405 contains a public float requirement of $700 
million, as discussed above. Smaller funds would not generally meet the 
public float thresholds to file a short-form registration statement or 
qualify as a WKSI and therefore would not generally be subject to 
either of these proposals.\537\ However, smaller affected funds may be 
affected by these proposed amendments in other ways. For example, 
smaller affected funds may be more likely to merge to obtain WKSI 
status, and could experience competitive disadvantages over larger 
funds that qualify as WKSIs or that file short-form registration 
statements on Form N-2.\538\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \535\ See supra footnote 33 and accompanying and preceding text.
    \536\ See supra Parts II.B.2.a and IV.B.1; supra paragraph 
accompanying footnote 33
    \537\ See supra Part IV.B.1; see also supra footnote and 
accompanying text.
    \538\ See supra Part IV.B.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We are also proposing to apply the delivery method for operating 
company final prospectuses to affected funds. As a result, an affected 
fund would be allowed to satisfy its final prospectus delivery 
obligations by filing its final prospectus with the Commission.\539\ 
These proposed requirements would apply to all affected funds, both 
large and small.\540\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \539\ See supra Part II.D.
    \540\ Affected funds using the new approach to prospectus 
delivery would be required to provide a notice to purchasers stating 
that a sale of securities was made pursuant to a registration 
statement or in a transaction in which a final prospectus would have 
been required to have been delivered in the absence of rule 172 
under the Securities Act. See supra footnote 109 and accompanying 
text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Communication Rules
    For smaller affected funds, we are not proposing any new 
restrictions on communications. As discussed above, the proposed 
amendments to Securities Act rules 134, 138, 139, 156, 163, 163A, 164, 
168, 169, and 433 make available the use of certain types of 
communications that were previously not available with respect to 
affected funds.\541\ Except as otherwise discussed below, we believe 
that there are no significant reporting, recordkeeping, or other 
compliance requirements associated with the proposed amendments. As 
such, except as otherwise discussed below, we believe that there are no 
attendant costs and administrative burdens for small

[[Page 14510]]

affected funds associated with these proposed amendments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \541\ See supra Parts II.E, IV.B.2, IV.C.1, and V.B.4. The 
proposed amendments to Securities Act rules 163 and 433 [17 CFR 
230.163 and 230.433], regarding the use of a free writing 
prospectus, would create new recordkeeping, filing, and compliance 
requirements that are addressed further below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the communication rules themselves do not create any 
new restrictions for small affected funds. Instead, small affected 
funds now may be able to take advantage of new communications options 
not previously afforded to them.\542\ We also note that rule 163, and 
the proposed amendments thereto, apply only to WKSIs. Consequently, the 
proposed amendments to rule 163 would not produce any benefit, or 
create any burden, for small affected funds because they would likely 
never qualify as WKSIs, as discussed above.\543\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \542\ See supra Parts II.E, IV.B.2, IV.C.1, and V.B.4. These 
include, for example, proposed amendments to rule 163A of the 
Securities Act, which provides a bright-line rule permitting 
communications more than 30 days before filing a registration 
statement, and proposed amendments to rule 169 of the Securities 
Act, which provides affected funds the ability to engage in regular 
factual business communications.
    \543\ See supra Part VI.D.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To the extent that an affected fund uses a free writing prospectus 
under the proposed rules, any affected fund--large or small--would 
incur the burden of the requirement to file a free writing prospectus, 
or retain a record of the free writing prospectus for three years if it 
was not filed with the Commission.\544\ However, we believe that the 
burden here would be negligible. Affected funds currently use rule 482 
of the Securities Act to engage in communications similar to those that 
would be permitted under the proposed amendments to rule 433, and these 
funds are required to file their rule 482 communication with either the 
Commission or, alternatively, with the Financial Industry Regulatory 
Authority (``FINRA'').\545\ The burden associated with the filing 
requirements that the proposed amendments to rule 433 would entail 
therefore would not be meaningfully different than the burden 
associated with the filing requirement for rule 482 communications. 
Rule 433, as proposed, would also create a recordkeeping requirement. 
We do not believe that this requirement would create any significant 
burden given that records of rule 482 communications must also be 
retained for a period that would generally exceed that required under 
rule 433.\546\ In addition, the recordkeeping requirement would apply 
only to affected funds (both large and small) that elect to use rule 
433, as proposed to be amended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \544\ See proposed rule 433(d) and (g) [17 CFR 230.433(d) and 
(g)] (Paragraph (d) of the rule provides for the various conditions 
and exclusions applicable to the general requirement of 433(d)(1) 
that an issuer or offering participant file its free writing 
prospectus. Paragraph (g) requires that if a free writing prospectus 
is not filed pursuant to paragraph (d) or (f) of rule 433, issuers 
and offering participants must retain all free writing prospectuses 
that have been used, for three years following the initial bona fide 
offering of the securities in question).
    \545\ See rule 482 Note To Paragraph (H) [17 CFR 230.482(h)] 
(Rule 482 requires that advertisements used in reliance on rule 482 
are required to be filed in accordance with the requirements of rule 
497, unless they are filed with FINRA). See supra footnote 544 and 
Parts IV.C and V.B.4.; see also rule 497(a) and (i) [17 CFR 
230.497(a) and (i)].
    \546\ See rule 31a-2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act [17 CFR 
270.31a-2(a)(3)] (requiring every registered investment company to 
preserve for no less than six years from the end of the fiscal year 
last used, any advertisement, pamphlet, circular form letter, or 
other sales literature addressed to or intended for distribution to 
prospective investors). Securities Act rule 433(g) requires an 
issuer and offering participants to retain all free writing 
prospectuses that have been used, and that have not been filed 
pursuant to paragraphs (d) or (f) of the rule, for three years 
following the initial bona fide offering of the securities in 
question. However, for a broker or dealer utilizing a free writing 
prospectus, rule 433 defers to the recordkeeping requirements under 
rule 17a-4 of the Exchange Act [17 CFR 240.17a-4] (requiring sales 
literature to be retained for not less than three years).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposal also would affect broker-dealers participating in a 
registered offering. Specifically, the proposed rules would affect: (1) 
Broker-dealers' publication and distribution of research reports on 
affected funds; and (2) broker-dealers' use of free writing 
prospectuses on affected funds.
    The proposed amendments to rule 138 would affect both large and 
small broker-dealers. These proposed amendments would now permit 
broker-dealers to publish or distribute research reports with respect 
to a broader class of issuers and securities without this publication 
or distribution being deemed to constitute an offer that otherwise 
could be a non-conforming prospectus in violation of section 5 of the 
Securities Act.\547\ Broker-dealers that once used rule 482 ads styled 
as research reports, and that instead would rely on rule 138 as 
proposed to be amended to publish or distribute similar communications, 
would no longer be subject to any filing requirement for these 
communications. Consequently, we expect that the proposed amendments to 
rule 138 could result in fewer rule 482 communications being filed with 
FINRA.\548\ This in turn could reduce filing-related administrative 
costs for broker-dealers publishing or distributing research reports on 
affected funds under the proposed amendments to rule 138. However, 
large and small broker-dealers would not be affected differently by the 
proposed amendments to rule 138.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \547\ See proposed rule 138.
    \548\ See supra footnote 545 and FINRA rule 2210(c)(7)(F) 
(requiring a broker-dealer to file with FINRA an investment company 
prospectus published pursuant to Securities Act rule 482).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the proposed free writing prospectus rule amendments 
would permit broker-dealers to engage in these communications on behalf 
of the affected fund issuer.\549\ This would require broker-dealers, 
both large and small, to file the free writing prospectuses that they 
use with the Commission, or maintain records of any free writing 
prospectuses used if it was not filed with the Commission.\550\ 
However, certain of these broker-dealers are already required to file 
communications made under rule 482.\551\ Broker-dealers that once used 
rule 482 ads and instead will rely on proposed amended rule 433 to 
publish or distribute similar communications, would no longer be 
required to file these communications with FINRA. Consequently, the 
proposed amendments to rule 433 could result in fewer rule 482 
communications being filed with FINRA and a potential increase in 
filings of free writing prospectuses by affected funds with the 
Commission.\552\ However, those broker-dealers that have not previously 
used rule 482 to publish or distribute the types of communications that 
the proposed amendments to rule 433 would permit would newly be subject 
to both the filing and recordkeeping requirements of rule 433.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \549\ See proposed rule 433(b) (Paragraph (b)(1) states that for 
WKSIs and seasoned issuers, both an issuer or offering participant 
may use a free writing prospectus, while paragraph (b)(2) states 
that for non-reporting and unseasoned issuers, any person 
participating in the offer or sale of the issuer's securities may 
use a free writing prospectus. Although the term ``offering 
participant'' is not defined, paragraph (h)(3) of rule 433 gives 
some context to this term.).
    \550\ See supra footnote 544.
    \551\ See supra footnote 545.
    \552\ See Part IV.C.1 and V.B.4 (noting that we are unable to 
predict whether affected funds would engage in more communications 
with investors as a result of the proposed rules). To the extent 
affected funds or broker-dealers would use a free writing prospectus 
for communications that currently occur under rule 482, we would 
expect an increase in such filings of free writing prospectuses as 
well as an increase in the number of rule 138 research reports, as 
amended, and a decrease in the number of 482 ads filed with FINRA. 
See supra footnote 489.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. New Registration Fee Payment Method for Interval Funds
    As discussed above, we are proposing a modernized approach to 
registration fee payment that would require interval funds to pay 
securities registration fees using the same method that mutual funds 
and ETFs use today.\553\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \553\ See supra Part II.G.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Interval funds, like other affected funds, are not currently 
permitted to

[[Page 14511]]

pay registration fees on this same annual ``net'' basis, and must pay 
the registration fee at the time of filing the registration 
statement.\554\ However, we believe that interval funds would benefit 
from the ability to pay their registration fees in the same manner as 
mutual funds and ETFs, and that this approach is appropriate in light 
of interval funds' operations.\555\ We believe this proposal would 
benefit small interval funds and larger interval funds equally, as the 
proposal would make the registration fee payment process for all 
interval funds more efficient as discussed above.\556\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \554\ Id.
    \555\ Id.
    \556\ Id.; see also Part IV.E.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. Disclosure and Reporting Requirements
    We are also proposing amendments to our rules and forms intended to 
tailor the disclosure and regulatory framework for affected funds in 
light of our proposed amendments to the offering rules applicable to 
them.\557\ These proposed amendments include: Structured data 
requirements; new periodic and current reporting requirements; 
amendments to provide affected funds additional flexibility to 
incorporate information by reference; and proposed enhancements to the 
disclosures that registered CEFs make to investors when the funds are 
not updating their registration statements.\558\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \557\ See supra Part II.H. Some of the proposed amendments 
reflect our consideration of the availability of information to 
investors, as required by the Registered CEF Act. Section 509(a) of 
the Registered CEF Act.
    \558\ See supra Parts II.H.1--II.H.5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Structured Data Requirements
    We are proposing to require BDCs, like operating companies, to 
submit financial statement information using Inline XBRL format; to 
require that affected funds include structured cover page information 
in their registration statements on Form N-2 using Inline XBRL format; 
and to require that certain information required in an affected fund's 
prospectus be tagged using Inline XBRL format; \559\ and to require 
that filings on Form 24F-2 be submitted in XML format.\560\ Large and 
small affected funds would both incur the burdens associated with these 
proposed structured data requirements. Furthermore, as noted above, we 
recognize that some registrants affected by the proposed requirement, 
particularly filers with no Inline XBRL experience, likely would incur 
initial costs to acquire the necessary expertise and/or software as 
well as ongoing costs of tagging required information in Inline XBRL, 
and the incremental effect of any fixed costs, including ongoing fixed 
costs, of complying with the Inline XBRL requirement may be greater for 
smaller filers.\561\ However, we believe that smaller affected funds in 
particular may benefit more from enhanced exposure to investors that 
could result from these proposed requirements.\562\ If reporting the 
disclosures in a structured format increases the availability, or 
reduces the cost of collecting and analyzing, key information about 
affected funds, smaller affected funds may benefit from improved 
coverage by third-party information providers and data aggregators.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \559\ See supra footnote 455 (noting that a seasoned fund filing 
a short-form registration statement on Form N-2 also would be 
required to tag information appearing in Exchange Act reports, such 
as those on Forms N-CSR, 10-K, or 8-K, if that information is 
required to be tagged in the fund's prospectus).
    \560\ See supra Parts II.H.1 and IV.E.1.
    \561\ See supra Part IV.E.2. But see supra footnote 398 (noting 
that since 2014, costs incurred utilizing XBRL have significantly 
reduced for smaller companies).
    \562\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Periodic Reporting Requirements
    We are also proposing to require registered CEFs to provide 
management's discussion of fund performance (or ``MDFP'') in their 
annual reports to shareholders, BDCs to provide financial highlights in 
their registration statements and annual reports, and affected funds 
filing a short-form registration statement on Form N-2 to disclose 
material unresolved staff comments.\563\ These proposed requirements 
are intended to modernize and harmonize our periodic report disclosure 
requirements for affected funds with those applicable to operating 
companies and mutual funds and ETFs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \563\ See supra Parts II.H.2.b, II.H.2.c, and II.H.2.d.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed amendments to require registered CEFs to include an 
MDFP section in the annual report and for BDCs to provide financial 
highlights in their registration statement and annual reports would 
apply to all applicable affected funds, large and small. We do not 
believe it would be appropriate to treat large and small entities 
differently for purposes of the proposed MDFP requirement. We believe 
that this proposed requirement would benefit investors by helping them 
assess a fund's performance over the prior year and complementing other 
information in the report, which may make the annual report disclosure 
more understandable as a whole.\564\ This investor protection benefit 
would be equally significant to investors in smaller affected funds as 
well as larger affected funds.\565\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \564\ See supra Part IV.E.3.
    \565\ See supra Part II.H.2.b and II.H.2.c; see also supra Part 
V.B.3 (discussing the burden hours associated with complying with 
the proposed disclosure requirements for both small and large 
affected funds).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We similarly believe that the informational benefit of BDCs' 
proposed inclusion of the financial highlights in their registration 
statements should apply equally to investors in large and small BDCs, 
and therefore we believe this proposed disclosure requirement is 
appropriate for all BDCs. We also believe the costs associated with 
this proposed requirement should be minimal for both large and small 
BDCs, since we understand that it is general market practice for BDCs 
to include this information in their registration statements.\566\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \566\ Id.; see also supra Parts V.B.1 and V.B.3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, with respect to the proposed requirement for affected 
funds that file a short form registration statement on Form N-2 to 
disclose material staff comments, this requirement would apply only to 
those entities that qualify for the short-form registration statement, 
which generally would not include smaller affected funds.\567\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \567\ See supra footnote 520.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

New Current Reporting Requirements for Affected Funds
    In order to improve information for investors and to provide parity 
with BDCs and operating companies, we are also proposing to require all 
registered CEFs that are reporting companies under section 13(a) or 
section 15(d) of the Exchange Act to report certain specified events 
and information on Form 8-K on a current basis, to provide investors 
and the market with timely information about these events.\568\ We 
believe that the proposed reportable events occur infrequently and thus 
should not result in a significant burden on affected funds resulting 
from the proposed Form 8-K requirements.\569\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \568\ See supra Parts II.H.3.a. and IV.E.4; see also supra 
footnote 243.
    \569\ See supra PartsII.H.3.b and IV.E.4. We note in Part IV.E.4 
supra that existing items on Form 8-K generally have not led to 
frequent reporting obligations for BDCs. In addition, we are 
proposing to extend the safe harbor for failure to report certain 
Form 8-K items to include the new proposed reporting items for 
affected funds, which would limit liability concerns and the 
potential impact on an affected fund's ability to raise capital 
associated with failing to timely file a report under these items.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, certain items in Form 8-K are substantively the same 
as or similar to existing disclosure requirements in the annual and 
semi-

[[Page 14512]]

annual reports for registered CEFs. We do not believe that requiring 
similar disclosure on Form 8-K and in a registered CEF's annual or 
semi-annual reports should result in significant burdens for registered 
CEFs (including small registered CEFs) since, absent significant 
changes, they should be able to use their Form 8-K disclosure to more 
efficiently prepare the corresponding disclosure in any shareholder 
reports that follow funds' issuance of reports on Form 8-K.\570\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \570\ See id.; see also supra footnote 257.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We also propose to amend Form 8-K to add two new reporting items 
for affected funds and tailor the existing reporting instructions to 
affected funds.\571\ The additional reporting items we propose are 
designed to recognize certain differences between events that are 
relevant to affected funds and those that are relevant to operating 
companies.\572\ An affected fund would be required to file a report on 
Form 8-K if the fund has: (1) A material change to its investment 
objectives or policies; or (2) a material write-down in fair value of a 
significant investment. We believe it is appropriate to propose these 
new reporting items, which would apply to all affected funds, large and 
small, to better tailor Form 8-K disclosure to these types of 
investment companies.\573\ We do not believe these new items would 
create a significant burden.\574\ Form 8-K is meant to capture 
important events, many of which may occur at a low frequency and should 
not result in numerous, persistent reports on Form 8-K by affected 
funds.\575\ These two events are designed to recognize certain events 
that are important to affected fund investors, regardless of the size 
of the affected fund, where current information about such events would 
be beneficial to investors and the market.\576\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \571\ See supra Parts II.H.3.b and IV.E.4.
    \572\ See supra Part II.H.3.b.
    \573\ See supra Parts II.H.3.b and IV.E.4.
    \574\ Id.
    \575\ Id.
    \576\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Online Availability of Information Incorporated by Reference
    We are also proposing to modernize Form N-2's requirements for 
backward incorporation by reference by all affected funds. Affected 
funds would no longer be required to deliver to new investors 
information that they have incorporated by reference.\577\ Instead, we 
are proposing that these funds make the incorporated materials and 
corresponding prospectus and SAI readily available and accessible on a 
website maintained by or for the fund and identified in the fund's 
prospectus or SAI.\578\ We do not believe this requirement would 
generate significant compliance costs for affected funds because many 
funds currently post their annual and semi-annual reports and other 
fund information on their websites.\579\ Nor do we think it would be 
appropriate to treat large and small entities differently for purposes 
of the proposed amendment. The proposed requirement would make the 
incorporated information, prospectus, and SAI more accessible to retail 
investors, who we believe may be more inclined to look at a fund's 
website for information than to search the EDGAR system.\580\ The 
proposed rule would also increase the likelihood that fund investors 
view the information in their preferred format, and thereby increase 
their use of the information to make investment decisions.\581\ We 
believe that these investor protection benefits should be available 
equally for investors in smaller and larger affected funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \577\ See supra Parts II.H.4 and IV.E.5.
    \578\ Id.
    \579\ See Part IV.E.5.
    \580\ Id.
    \581\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposed Enhancements to Certain Registered CEFs' Annual Report 
Disclosure
    Finally, the proposed amendments to rule 8b-16 of the Investment 
Company Act would require funds relying on that rule to describe 
material changes in their annual reports in enough detail to allow 
investors to understand each change and how it may affect the 
fund.\582\ The proposed amendments also would require funds to preface 
such disclosures with a legend.\583\ The proposed amendments to rule 
8b-16 would only affect that portion of registered CEFs that rely on 
rule 8b-16.\584\ We do not think it would be appropriate to treat large 
and small entities differently for purposes of the proposed amendments 
to rule 8b-16, as this new requirement would allow investors in funds 
relying on the rule to more easily identify and understand key 
information about their investments.\585\ We believe that this investor 
protection benefit should be available equally for investors in smaller 
and larger affected funds. In addition, the proposed new requirement 
would likely add only a small incremental compliance burden because 
funds relying on rule 8b-16 are already required to disclose the 
enumerated changes.\586\ The proposed amendments described in Part II.H 
above would apply to affected funds that are small entities as well as 
other affected funds unless noted otherwise.\587\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \582\ See supra Parts II.H.5 and IV.E.3.
    \583\ Id.
    \584\ See supra Part IV.E.3. Based on staff review of data 
derived from Morningstar Direct for the period ending December 31, 
2018, approximately 489 traded CEFs currently rely on rule 8b-16. Of 
these, we estimate that 20 would be small issuers based on net 
assets of $50 million or less.
    \585\ See Part IV.E.3.
    \586\ Id.
    \587\ See also supra Parts IV.E, V.B.1, V.B.2, V.B.3, and V.B.6 
(discussing the economic impact, and the estimated compliance costs 
and burdens, of the proposed rule and form amendments described in 
Part II.H).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

E. Duplicative, Overlapping, or Conflicting Federal Rules

    Except as otherwise discussed below, the Commission has not 
identified any federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with 
the proposed rules. Both the BDC Act and Registered CEF Act direct the 
Commission to allow BDCs and certain CEFs to take advantage of the 
offerings and communications rules under the Securities Act and 
Exchange Act to affected funds not previously available to them. 
Consequently, the rules provide an alternative to other procedures and 
processes currently available to affected funds.
    As discussed in detail above, we are proposing to require funds 
filing a short-form registration statement on Form N-2 to include key 
information in their annual reports that they currently disclose in 
their prospectuses.\588\ However, because the proposed requirement to 
include key information in annual reports applies to seasoned affected 
funds, there would be no impact on smaller affected funds.\589\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \588\ See supra Part II.H.2.
    \589\ See supra footnotes 535-536 and accompanying paragraph.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed amendments requiring registered CEFs that are Exchange 
Act reporting companies under section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the 
Exchange Act to now file Form 8-K also could entail some potential for 
regulatory duplication.\590\ For example, registered CEFs are generally 
required to provide the information required under Item 4.01 (Changes 
in Registrant's Certifying Accountant) of Form 8-K in their semi-annual 
or annual shareholder reports. Further, registered CEFs are required to 
provide in their semi-annual or annual shareholder reports certain 
information found in Item 5.07 of Form 8-K about matters submitted to a 
vote of shareholders. Although certain items in Form 8-K are 
substantively the same as or similar to existing disclosure 
requirements for registered CEFs, the existing requirements provide 
less

[[Page 14513]]

timely disclosure.\591\ As proposed, the Form 8-K requirements would 
require registered CEFs to disclose certain items within 4 business 
days of the relevant event, while the existing regime calls for similar 
disclosure on an annual or semi-annual basis in shareholder 
reports.\592\ We believe it would be appropriate to require registered 
CEFs to provide more timely and current disclosure on these matters on 
Form 8-K in order to ensure parity with the reporting requirements to 
which operating companies and BDCs are subject. We believe this 
approach should not result in significant burdens for registered CEFs 
(including small registered CEFs) since, absent significant changes, 
they should be able to use their Form 8-K disclosure to more 
efficiently prepare the corresponding disclosure in any shareholder 
reports that follow funds' issuance of reports on Form 8-K.\593\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \590\ See supra Part II.H.3.a and footnote 243.
    \591\ See supra footnote 257 and accompanying paragraph.
    \592\ Id.
    \593\ See supra footnote 257 and accompanying text; see also 
Part V.B.6 (estimating 704 registered CEFs as of September 2018, and 
assuming all would file Form 8-K). We estimate that there are 32 
registered CEFs that are small entities (see supra footnote 520). 
The Staff further estimates that based on review of EDGAR filings as 
February 2019 of the 32 registered CEFs, 17 are dually registered 
under the Securities Act and Investment Company Act. Based on these 
estimates, these 17 registered CEFs would be required to file 8-Ks 
under our proposed amendments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We do not anticipate that the proposed Form 8-K requirements would 
increase the compliance costs of affected funds' existing disclosure 
requirements, and they may, to some extent, reallocate certain of 
affected funds' existing disclosure costs to preparing Form 8-K 
disclosure since affected funds may be able to use the Form 8-K 
disclosure to help prepare disclosure that they are currently required 
to provide in annual or other periodic reports. Moreover, we believe 
that continuing to require the relevant disclosure in shareholder 
reports may reduce potential disruptions to shareholders who are 
accustomed to finding certain information in these reports and should 
limit discrepancies between different types of funds' shareholder 
reports.

F. Significant Alternatives

    The RFA directs the Commission to consider significant alternatives 
that would accomplish our stated objective, while minimizing any 
significant economic impact on small entities. Although the BDC Act and 
Registered CEF Act required certain amendments to our rules and forms, 
we could have, for example, made additional modifications to the 
relevant provisions with respect to affected funds that are small 
entities. Alternatively, we also could have limited the scope to BDCs 
(as the BDC Act specified) and to interval funds and listed registered 
CEFs (as the Registered CEF Act specified), which would have excluded 
from the scope of the proposed rules certain small entities that are 
registered CEFs but that are not interval funds or listed registered 
CEFs.\594\ Where our proposed amendments reflect an exercise of 
discretion, we considered the following alternatives for small entities 
in relation to our proposed amendments:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \594\ See supra Part II.A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Exempting affected funds that are small entities from the 
proposed disclosure, reporting, or recordkeeping requirements, to 
account for resources available to small entities;
     Establishing different compliance or reporting 
requirements or frequency to account for resources available to small 
entities;
     Clarifying, consolidating, or simplifying the compliance 
requirements under the amendments for small entities; and
     Using performance rather than design standards.
1. Alternatives to Proposed Approach to Implementing Statutory Mandates
    In accordance with the BDC Act and Registered CEF Act, we are 
proposing to modify the restrictions regarding offerings and 
communications permitted around the time of a Securities Act registered 
offering. The proposed flexibility would be greatest for larger and 
seasoned affected funds, but would also provide greater flexibility to 
all affected funds and broker-dealers, including small entities.
    We considered modifying the public float standards in the WKSI 
definition or the short-form registration instruction by reducing the 
required level of public float or providing alternative eligibility 
criteria, such as net asset value of a certain size for funds whose 
shares are not traded on an exchange or through the use of 
``performance'' rather than ``design'' standards.\595\ These 
alternatives would have allowed more affected funds, potentially 
including small entities, to qualify as WKSIs or file short-form 
registration statements. However, we believe that modifying the 
eligibility criteria in the WKSI definition or the short-form 
registration instruction could weaken the investor protection benefits 
provided by those criteria.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \595\ See supra Part II.C.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We also considered extending the proposed rules only to BDCs, 
listed registered CEFs, and interval funds.\596\ However, excluding 
unlisted registered CEFs from the proposed rules could create 
unnecessary competitive disparities between unlisted registered CEFs 
(which would potentially include smaller funds) and unlisted BDCs and 
would not provide investors in unlisted registered CEFs with the 
benefits of the new investor protections we are proposing.\597\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \596\ See supra Part IV.D.
    \597\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Alternative Approaches to Discretionary Choices
New Registration Fee Payment Method for Interval Funds
    We considered, but are not proposing, allowing a wider range of 
affected funds, such as registered CEFs that are tender offer funds, to 
rely on rule 24f-2.\598\ To the extent that this alternative would have 
brought in additional small affected funds, it could have extended the 
benefits of this fee payment method to additional small entities. 
However, we did not propose this alternative approach because interval 
funds have structural similarities to mutual funds and ETFs that other 
affected funds do not.\599\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \598\ See supra Part IV.E.1.
    \599\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Structured Data Requirements
    As an alternative, we could have proposed requiring the Inline XBRL 
requirements only for a subset of affected funds--for example, affected 
funds that file short-form registration statements on Form N-2 or 
WKSIs.\600\ This would have lessened the burden associated with the 
proposed structured data requirements on smaller affected funds. 
However, a structured data program that captures only a subset of 
affected funds would reduce potential data quality benefits compared to 
mandatory Inline XBRL requirements for all affected funds.\601\ This in 
turn would reduce data users' ability to meaningfully analyze, 
aggregate, and compare data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \600\ See supra Part V.B.2.
    \601\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    However, we are proposing an extended compliance period for the 
proposed new XBRL reporting requirements for affected funds that would 
not be eligible to file a short-form registration statement. This 
extended compliance period--which would apply to affected funds that do 
not meet the transaction requirement to qualify to file a short-form 
registration statement on

[[Page 14514]]

Form N-2 (i.e., generally those affected funds with a public float of 
$75 million), and which encompasses the small entities subject to the 
proposed rule discussed above--should enable small entities to defer 
the burden of additional cost associated with the proposed XBRL 
requirements and learn from affected funds that comply earlier.
Periodic Reporting Requirements and Online Availability of Information 
Incorporated by Reference
    We also considered a partial or complete exemption from the 
proposed periodic reporting requirements, and for the proposed 
requirements to make information incorporated by reference available on 
a website, for small entities.\602\ With respect to the periodic 
reporting requirements, small entities that are not affected funds 
currently follow the same requirements that large entities do when 
filing periodic reports, and we believe that establishing different 
reporting requirements or frequency for small entities that are 
affected funds would not be consistent with the Commission's goal of 
investor protection and industry oversight. For example, we could have 
proposed to require smaller affected funds to include in their annual 
reports less information from their registration statements. While 
requiring less information would reduce costs to smaller affected funds 
by reducing the amount of required annual report disclosure, it could 
also make it more difficult for investors in these funds to find 
important fund information. Similarly, we believe that the investor 
protection benefits associated with the other proposed periodic 
reporting requirements that apply to large and small affected funds--
for example, the proposed MDFP requirement for registered CEFs and the 
proposed inclusion of BDCs' financial highlights in their registration 
statement--should apply equally to investors in large and small 
affected funds.\603\ We also believe that the investor protection 
benefits stemming from the proposed requirement to make materials 
incorporated by reference available on a website should be available 
equally for investors in smaller and larger affected funds, and 
therefore this proposed rule applies equally to large and small 
affected funds.\604\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \602\ See supra Part IV.E.3.
    \603\ See supra Part VI.D.4.
    \604\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

New Current Reporting Requirements for Affected Funds

    With respect to our proposed amendments to current reports on Form 
8-K, we do not believe that small affected fund issuers would have to 
report more frequently than other issuers. We therefore believe that 
different reporting requirements or timetables for small entities would 
interfere with achieving the primary goal of making information about 
important events promptly available to investors and the public 
securities markets.\605\ Similarly, clarifying, simplifying or 
consolidating compliance or reporting requirements would potentially 
create different requirements for smaller funds as compared to larger 
ones. Such a framework would interfere with the Commission's objective 
to supply investors and the public securities markets with data that is 
easily retrievable for all issuers and to supply them with information 
about funds of all sizes, and their important events, in a timely and 
relevant manner.\606\ We also do not believe such a framework would be 
consistent with the goal of investor protection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \605\ See supra Part IV.E.4.
    \606\ See supra Part IV.E.4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    However, we are proposing an extended compliance period for the 
proposed new current reporting requirements for affected funds that 
would not be eligible to file a short-form registration statement. This 
extended compliance period--which would apply to affected funds that do 
not meet the transaction requirement to qualify to file a short-form 
registration statement on Form N-2 (i.e., generally those affected 
funds with a public float of $75 million), and which encompasses the 
small entities subject to the proposed rule discussed above--should 
enable small entities to defer the burden of additional cost associated 
with the proposed 8-K requirements and learn from affected funds that 
comply earlier.

G. General Request for Comment

    The Commission requests comments regarding this IRFA. We request 
comments on the number of small entities that may be affected by our 
proposed rules and guidelines, and whether the proposed rules and 
guidelines would have any effects not considered in this analysis. We 
request that commenters describe the nature of any effects on small 
entities subject to the proposed rules and provide empirical data to 
support the nature and extent of such effects. We also request comment 
on the proposed compliance burdens and the effect these burdens would 
have on smaller entities.

VII. Consideration of Impact on the Economy

    For purposes of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness 
Act of 1996 (``SBREFA''),\607\ the Commission must advise OMB whether a 
proposed regulation constitutes a ``major'' rule. Under SBREFA, a rule 
is considered ``major'' where, if adopted, if results in or is likely 
to result in:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \607\ Public Law 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996) 
(codified in various sections of 5 U.S.C., 15 U.S.C., and as a note 
to 5 U.S.C. 601).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     An annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more;
     A major increase in costs or prices for consumers or 
individual industries; or
     Significant adverse effects on competition, investment, or 
innovation.
    We request comment on whether our proposal would be a ``major 
rule'' for purposes of SBREFA. We solicit comment and empirical data 
on:
     The potential effect on the U.S. economy on an annual 
basis;
     Any potential increase in costs or prices for consumers or 
individual industries; and
     Any potential effect on competition, investment, or 
innovation.
    We request that commenters provide empirical data and other factual 
support for their views to the extent possible.

VIII. Statutory Authority

    The amendments contained in this release are being proposed under 
the authority set forth in the Securities Act, particularly sections 6, 
7, 8, 10, 19, 27A, and 28 thereof [15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.]; the Exchange 
Act, particularly sections 2, 3(b), 9(a), 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17(a), 
21E, 23(a), 35A, and 36 thereof [15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.]; the Investment 
Company Act, particularly sections 6(c), 8, 20(a), 23, 24, 29, 30, 31, 
37, and 38 thereof [15 U.S.C. 80a et seq.]; the BDC Act, particularly 
section 803(b) thereof [Pub. L. 115-141, title VIII]; and the 
Registered CEF Act, particularly section 509(a) thereof [Pub. L. 115-
174].

Text of Proposed Rules and Forms

List of Subjects

17 CFR Part 229

    Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities.

17 CFR Part 230

    Advertising, Confidential business information, Investment 
Companies, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities.

17 CFR Part 232

    Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business

[[Page 14515]]

information, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities.

17 CFR Part 240

    Brokers, Confidential business information, Fraud, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Securities.

17 CFR Part 243

    Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities.

17 CFR Part 249

    Brokers, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities

17 CFR Part 270

    Confidential business information, Fraud, Investment companies, 
Life insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities.

17 CFR Part 274

    Investment companies, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
Securities.

    For reasons set forth in the preamble, we propose to amend Title 
17, Chapter II of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:

PART 229--STANDARD INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING FORMS UNDER SECURITIES 
ACT OF 1933, SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AND ENERGY POLICY AND 
CONSERVATION ACT OF 1975--REGULATION S-K

0
1. The authority citation for part 229 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  15 U.S.C. 77e, 77f, 77g, 77h, 77j, 77k, 77s, 77z-2, 
77z-3, 77aa(25), 77aa(26), 77ddd, 77eee, 77ggg, 77hhh, 77iii, 77jjj, 
77nnn, 77sss, 78c, 78i, 78j, 78j-3, 78l, 78m, 78n, 78n-1, 78o, 78u-
5, 78w, 78ll, 78 mm, 80a-8, 80a-9, 80a-20, 80a-29, 80a-30, 80a-
31(c), 80a-37, 80a-38(a), 80a-39, 80b-11 and 7201 et seq.; 18 U.S.C. 
1350; sec. 953(b), Pub. L. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1904 (2010); and sec. 
102(c), Pub. L. 112-106, 126 Stat. 310 (2012).

0
2. Amend Sec.  229.601 by revising paragraph (b)(101)(i) introductory 
text and paragraph (b)(101)(ii)(A) to read as follows.

Sec.  229.601   (Item 601) Exhibits.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (101) * * *
    (i) Required to be submitted. Required to be submitted to the 
Commission in the manner provided by Sec.  232.405 of this chapter if 
the registrant is not registered under the Investment Company Act of 
1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.), except that an Interactive Data File:
* * * * *
    (ii) * * *
    (A) Registrant is not registered under the Investment Company Act 
of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.); and
* * * * *

PART 230--GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS, SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

0
3. The authority citation for part 230 is revised to read, in part, as 
follows:

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77b, 77b note, 77c, 77d, 77f, 77g, 77h, 
77j, 77r, 77s, 77z-3, 77sss, 78c, 78d, 78j, 78l, 78m, 78n, 78o, 78o-
7 note, 78t, 78w, 78ll(d), 78mm, 80a-8, 80a-24, 80a-28, 80a-29, 80a-
30, and 80a-37, Pub. L. 112-106, sec. 201(a), sec. 401, 126 Stat. 
313 (2012), sec. 803(b), Pub. L. 115-141, 132 Stat. 348 (2018), and 
sec. 509(a), Pub. L. 115-174, 132 Stat. 1296 (2018), unless 
otherwise noted.
* * * * *
0
4. Amend Sec.  230.134 by revising paragraph (g) to read as follows:

Sec.  230.134   Communications not deemed a prospectus.

* * * * *
    (g) This section does not apply to a communication relating to an 
investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 
(15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.), other than a registered closed-end 
investment company.
0
5. Amend Sec.  230.138 by:
0
a. Revising the text to the ``Instruction to paragraph (a)(1):''; and
0
b. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(i).
    The revisions read as follows:

Sec.  230.138   Publications or distributions of research reports by 
brokers or dealers about securities other than those they are 
distributing.

    (a) * * *
    (1) * * *
    Instruction to paragraph (a)(1): If the issuer has filed a shelf 
registration statement under Rule 415(a)(1)(x) (Sec.  230.415(a)(1)(x)) 
or pursuant to General Instruction I.D. of Form S-3, General 
Instruction I.C. of Form F-3 (Sec.  239.13 or Sec.  239.33 of this 
chapter), or pursuant to General Instructions A.2 and B of Form N-2 
(Sec.  239.14 and Sec.  274.11a-1 of this chapter) with respect to 
multiple classes of securities, the conditions of paragraph (a)(1) of 
this section must be satisfied for the offering in which the broker or 
dealer is participating or will participate.
    (2) The issuer as of the date of reliance on this section:
    (i) (A) Is required to file reports, and has filed all periodic 
reports required during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter time 
that the issuer was required to file such reports) on Forms 10-K (Sec.  
249.310 of this chapter), 10-Q (Sec.  249.308a of this chapter), and 
20-F (Sec.  249.220f of this chapter) pursuant to Section 13 or Section 
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); 
or
    (B) (1) Is a registered closed-end investment company; and
    (2) Is required to file reports, and has filed all periodic reports 
required during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter time that the 
issuer was required to file such reports) on Forms N-CSR (Sec. Sec.  
249.331 and 274.128 of this chapter), N-Q (Sec. Sec.  249.332 and 
274.130 of this chapter), N-PORT (Sec.  274.150 of this chapter), and 
N-CEN (Sec. Sec.  249.330 and 274.101 of this chapter) pursuant to 
section 30 of the Investment Company Act; or
* * * * *

Sec.  230.138  [Amended]

0
6. Effective May 1, 2020, amend Sec.  230.138 by removing ``N-Q 
(Sec. Sec.  249.332 and 274.130 of this chapter),'' in paragraph 
(a)(2)(i)(B)(2).
0
7. Amend Sec.  230.156 by adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:

Sec.  230.156   Investment company sales literature.

* * * * *
    (d) Nothing in this section may be construed to prevent a business 
development company or a registered closed-end investment company, from 
qualifying for an exemption under Sec.  230.168 of this chapter or 
Sec.  230.169 of this chapter.
0
8. Amend Sec.  230.163 by:
0
a. Adding ``or'' after the semicolon at the end of paragraph (b)(3)(i);
0
b. Revising paragraph (b)(3)(ii); and
0
c. Removing paragraph (b)(3)(iii).
    The revision to read as follows:

Sec.  230.163  Exemption from section 5(c) of the Act for certain 
communications by or on behalf of well-known seasoned issuers.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (3) * * *
    (ii) Communications by an issuer that is an investment company 
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et 
seq.), other than a registered closed-end investment company.
* * * * *
0
9. Amend Sec.  230.163A by revising paragraph (b)(4) to read as 
follows:

Sec.  230.163A   Exemption from section 5(c) of the Act for certain 
communications made by or on behalf of issuers more than 30 days before 
a registration statement is filed.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (4) Communications made by an issuer that is an investment company

[[Page 14516]]

registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et 
seq.), other than a registered closed-end investment company.
* * * * *
0
10. Amend Sec.  230.164 by revising paragraph (f) to read as follows:

Sec.  230.164  Post-filing free writing prospectuses in connection with 
certain registered offerings.

* * * * *
    (f) Excluded issuers. This section and Rule 433 are not available 
if the issuer is an investment company registered under the Investment 
Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.), other than a registered 
closed-end investment company.
* * * * *
0
11. Amend Sec.  230.168 by revising paragraph (b)(1) introductory text, 
paragraph (b)(2) introductory text, and paragraph (d)(3) to read as 
follows:

Sec.  230.168  Exemption from sections 2(a)(10) and 5(c) of the Act for 
certain communications of regularly released factual business 
information and forward-looking information.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (1) Factual business information means some or all of the following 
information that is released or disseminated under the conditions in 
paragraph (d) of this section, including, without limitation, such 
factual business information contained in reports or other materials 
filed with, furnished to, or submitted to the Commission pursuant to 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) or the 
Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.):
* * * * *
    (2) Forward-looking information means some or all of the following 
information that is released or disseminated under the conditions in 
paragraph (d) of this section, including, without limitation, such 
forward-looking information contained in reports or other materials 
filed with, furnished to, or submitted to the Commission pursuant to 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or pursuant to the Investment 
Company Act of 1940:
* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (3) The issuer is not an investment company registered under the 
Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.), other than a 
registered closed-end investment company.
0
12. Amend Sec.  230.169 by revising paragraph (d)(4) to read as 
follows:

Sec.  230.169  Exemption from sections 2(a)(10) and 5(c) of the Act for 
certain communications of regularly released factual business 
information.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (4) The issuer is not an investment company registered under the 
Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.), other than a 
registered closed-end investment company.
0
13. Amend Sec.  230.172 by revising paragraph (d)(1) to read as 
follows, removing paragraph (d)(2); and re-designating paragraphs 
(d)(3) and (d)(4) as paragraphs (d)(2) and (d)(3).

Sec.  230.172  Delivery of prospectuses.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (1) Offering of any investment company registered under the 
Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.) other than a 
registered closed-end investment company;
* * * * *
0
14. Amend Sec.  230.173 by revising paragraph (f)(2) to read as 
follows, removing paragraph (f)(3) and re-designating paragraphs (f)(4) 
and (f)(5) as paragraphs (f)(3) and (f)(4).

Sec.  230.173  Notice of registration.

* * * * *
    (f) * * *
    (2) Offering of an investment company registered under the 
Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.) other than a 
registered closed-end investment company;
* * * * *
0
15. Amend Sec.  230.405 by:
0
a. Revising the definition of ``Automatic shelf registration 
statement.'';
0
b. In the definition of ``Ineligible user:''
0
i. Revising paragraph (1)(i);
0
ii. In paragraph (1)(vii) removing the words ``years; or'' and adding 
in their place ``years;'';
0
iii. In paragraph (1)(viii) removing ``offering.'' and adding in its 
place ``offering; or'';
0
iv. Adding paragraph (1)(ix) to the definition of ``Ineligible 
issuer.'';
0
c. Adding in alphabetical order the definition ``Registered closed-end 
investment company.'';
0
d. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (1)(i), and paragraphs 
(1)(i)(B)(2), (1)(v), and (2)(iii) of the definition of ``Well-known 
seasoned issuer.'';
    The additions and revisions read as follows:

Sec.  230.405  Definitions of terms.

* * * * *
    Automatic shelf registration statement. The term automatic shelf 
registration statement means a registration statement filed on Form S-
3, Form F-3, or Form N-2 (Sec.  239.13, Sec.  239.33, or Sec.  239.14 
and Sec.  274.11a-1 of this chapter) by a well-known seasoned issuer 
pursuant to General Instruction I.D. of Form S-3, General Instruction 
I.C. of Form F-3, or General Instruction B of Form N-2.
* * * * *
    Ineligible issuer.
    (1) * * *
    (i) Any issuer that is required to file reports pursuant to section 
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 
78o(d)) or section 30 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 
80a-29) that has not filed all reports and other materials required to 
be filed during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period 
that the issuer was required to file such reports pursuant to sections 
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or section 30 of the 
Investment Company Act of 1940), other than reports on Form 8-K (Sec.  
249.308 of this chapter) required solely pursuant to an item specified 
in General Instruction I.A.3(b) of Form S-3 (Sec.  239.13 of this 
chapter) or General Instruction A.2.a of Form N-2 (Sec.  239.14 and 
Sec.  274.11a-1 of this chapter) (or in the case of an asset-backed 
issuer, to the extent the depositor or any issuing entity previously 
established, directly or indirectly, by the depositor (as such terms 
are defined in Item 1101 of Regulation AB (Sec.  229.1101 of this 
chapter) are or were at any time during the preceding 12 calendar 
months required to file reports pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with respect to a class of asset-backed 
securities involving the same asset class, such depositor and each such 
issuing entity must have filed all reports and other material required 
to be filed for such period (or such shorter period that each such 
entity was required to file such reports), other than reports on Form 
8-K required solely pursuant to an item specified in General 
Instruction I.A.2 of Form SF-3);
* * * * *
    (ix) In the case of an issuer that is a registered closed-end 
investment company or a business development company, within the past 
three years any person or entity that at the time was an investment 
adviser to the issuer, including any sub-adviser, was made the subject 
of any judicial or administrative decree or order arising

[[Page 14517]]

out of a governmental action that determines that the investment 
adviser aided or abetted or caused the issuer to have violated the 
anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws.
* * * * *
    Registered closed-end investment company. The term registered 
closed-end investment company means a closed-end company, as defined in 
section 5(a)(2) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-
5(a)(2)), that is registered under the Investment Company Act.
* * * * *
    Well-known seasoned issuer. * * *
    (1)(i) Meets all the registrant requirements of General Instruction 
I.A. of Form S-3 or Form F-3 (Sec.  239.13 or Sec.  239.33 of this 
chapter), or General Instructions A.2.a and A.2.b of Form N-2 (Sec.  
239.14 and Sec.  274.11a-1 of this chapter) and either:
* * * * *
    (B)(1) * * *
    (2) Will register only non-convertible securities, other than 
common equity, and full and unconditional guarantees permitted pursuant 
to paragraph (1)(ii) of this definition unless, at the determination 
date, the issuer also is eligible to register a primary offering of its 
securities relying on General Instruction I.B.1. of Form S-3 or Form F-
3 or is eligible to register a primary offering described in General 
Instruction I.B.1. of Form S-3 relying on General Instruction A.2 of 
Form N-2.
* * * * *
    (v) Is not an investment company registered under the Investment 
Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.), other than a registered 
closed-end investment company.
    (2) * * *
    (iii) In the event that the issuer has not filed a shelf 
registration statement or amended a shelf registration statement for 
purposes of complying with section 10(a)(3) of the Act for sixteen 
months, the time of filing of the issuer's most recent annual report on 
Form 10-K (Sec.  249.310 of this chapter), Form 20-F (Sec.  249.220f of 
this chapter), or Form N-CSR (Sec.  249.331 and Sec.  274.128 of this 
chapter) (or if such report has not been filed by its due date, such 
due date).
* * * * *
0
16. Amend Sec.  230.415 by revising paragraphs (a)(1)(x), (a)(1)(xi), 
and (a)(2) to read as follows:

Sec.  230.415   Delayed or Continuous Offering and Sale of Securities.

    (a) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (x) Securities registered (or qualified to be registered) on Form 
S-3 or Form F-3 (Sec.  239.13 or Sec.  239.33 of this chapter), or on 
Form N-2 (Sec.  239.14 and Sec.  274.11a-1 of this chapter) pursuant to 
General Instruction A.2 of that form, which are to be offered and sold 
on an immediate, continuous or delayed basis by or on behalf of the 
registrant, a majority-owned subsidiary of the registrant or a person 
of which the registrant is a majority-owned subsidiary; or
    (xi) Shares of common stock which are to be offered and sold on a 
delayed or continuous basis by or on behalf of a registered closed-end 
investment company or business development company that makes periodic 
repurchase offers pursuant to Sec.  270.23c-3 of this chapter.
* * * * *
    (2) Securities in paragraph (a)(1)(viii) of this section and 
securities in paragraph (a)(1)(ix) of this section that are not 
registered on Form S-3 or Form F-3 (Sec.  239.13 or Sec.  239.33 of 
this chapter), or on Form N-2 (Sec.  239.14 and Sec.  274.11a-1 of this 
chapter) pursuant to General Instruction A.2 of that form, may only be 
registered in an amount which, at the time the registration statement 
becomes effective, is reasonably expected to be offered and sold within 
two years from the initial effective date of the registration.
* * * * *
0
17. Amend Sec.  230.418 by revising paragraph (a)(3) to read as 
follows:

Sec.  230.418   Supplemental information.

    (a) * * *
    (3) Except in the case of a registrant eligible to use Form S-3 
(Sec.  239.13 of this chapter) or Form N-2 (Sec. Sec.  239.14 and 
274.11a-1 of this chapter) under General Instruction A.2 of that form, 
any engineering, management or similar reports or memoranda relating to 
broad aspects of the business, operations or products of the 
registrant, which have been prepared within the past twelve months for 
or by the registrant and any affiliate of the registrant or any 
principal underwriter, as defined in Rule 405 (Sec.  230.405), of the 
securities being registered except for:
* * * * *
0
18. Amend Sec.  230.424 by revising paragraph (f) to read as follows:

Sec.  230.424  Filing of prospectuses, number of copies.

* * * * *
    (f) This rule shall not apply with respect to prospectuses of an 
investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 
other than a registered closed-end investment company. References to 
``form of prospectus'' in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section 
shall be deemed also to refer to the form of Statement of Additional 
Information.
* * * * *
0
19. Amend Sec.  230.430B by:
0
a. Revising the introductory text to paragraph (b);
0
b. Revising paragraph (f)(4) introductory text and paragraph 
(f)(4)(ii); and
0
c. Revising paragraph (i).
    The revisions read as follows:

Sec.  230.430B   Prospectus in a registration statement after effective 
date.

* * * * *
    (b) A form of prospectus filed as part of a registration statement 
for offerings pursuant to Rule 415(a)(1)(i) by an issuer eligible to 
use Form S-3 or Form F-3 (Sec. Sec.  239.13 or 239.33 of this chapter) 
for primary offerings pursuant to General Instruction I.B.1 of such 
forms, or an issuer eligible to register such a primary offering under 
General Instruction A.2 of Form N-2 (Sec. Sec.  239.14 and 274.11a-1 of 
this chapter), may omit the information specified in paragraph (a) of 
this section, and may also omit the identities of selling security 
holders and amounts of securities to be registered on their behalf if:
* * * * *
    (f) * * *
    (4) Except for an effective date resulting from the filing of a 
form of prospectus filed for purposes of including information required 
by section 10(a)(3) of the Act or pursuant to Item 512(a)(1)(ii) of 
Regulation S-K (Sec.  229.512(a)(1)(ii) of this chapter) or Item 
34.4.a(2) of Form N-2 (Sec.  239.14 and Sec.  274.11a-1 of this 
chapter), the date a form of prospectus is deemed part of and included 
in the registration statement pursuant to this paragraph shall not be 
an effective date established pursuant to paragraph (f)(2) of this 
section as to:
* * * * *
    (ii) Any person signing any report or document incorporated by 
reference into the registration statement, except for such a report or 
document incorporated by reference for purposes of including 
information required by section 10(a)(3) of the Act or pursuant to Item 
512(a)(1)(ii) of Regulation S-K or Item 34.4.a(2) of Form N-2 (Sec.  
239.14 and Sec.  274.11a-1 of this chapter) (such person except for 
such reports being deemed not to be a person who signed the 
registration statement within the meaning of section 11(a) of the Act).
* * * * *
    (i) Issuers relying on this section shall furnish the undertakings 
required by

[[Page 14518]]

Item 512(a) of Regulation S-K or Item 34.4 of Form N-2 (Sec.  239.14 
and Sec.  274.11a-1 of this chapter) as applicable.
0
20. Amend Sec.  230.433 by revising paragraphs (b)(1)(i), (b)(1)(iv), 
and (c)(1)(ii) to read as follows:

Sec.  230.433   Conditions to permissible post-filing free writing 
prospectuses.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (i) Offerings of securities registered on Form S-3 (Sec.  239.33 of 
this chapter) pursuant to General Instruction I.B.1, I.B.2, I.C., or 
I.D. thereof or on Form SF-3 (Sec.  239.45 of this chapter) or on Form 
N-2 (Sec.  239.14 and Sec.  274.11a-1 of this chapter) pursuant to 
General Instruction A.2 with respect to the same transactions;
* * * * *
    (iv) Any other offering not excluded from reliance on this section 
and Rule 164 of securities of an issuer eligible to use Form S-3 or 
Form F-3 for primary offerings pursuant to General Instruction I.B.1 of 
such Forms or an issuer eligible to use General Instruction A.2 of Form 
N-2 to register a primary offering described in General Instruction 
I.B.1 of Form S-3.
* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (ii) Information contained in the issuer's periodic and current 
reports filed or furnished to the Commission pursuant to section 13 or 
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) 
that are incorporated by reference into the registration statement and 
not superseded or modified, or pursuant to section 30 of the Investment 
Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-29).
* * * * *
0
21. Amend Sec.  230.462 by revising paragraph (f) to read as follows:

Sec.  230.462   Immediate effectiveness of certain registration 
statements and post-effective amendments.

* * * * *
    (f) A post-effective amendment filed pursuant to paragraph (e) of 
this section for purposes of adding a new issuer and its securities as 
permitted by Rule 413(b) (Sec.  230.413(b)) that satisfies the 
requirements of Form S-3, Form F-3, or General Instruction A.2 of Form 
N-2 (Sec.  239.13, Sec.  239.33, or Sec.  239.14 and Sec.  274.11a-1 of 
this chapter), as applicable, including the signatures required by Rule 
402(e) (Sec.  230.402(e)), and contains a prospectus satisfying the 
requirements of Rule 430B (Sec.  230.430B), shall become effective upon 
filing with the Commission.
0
22. Amend Sec.  230.497 by:
0
a. Removing from paragraphs (c) and (e) the text ``Form N-2 (Sec. Sec.  
239.14 and 274.11a-1 of this chapter),''; and
0
b. Adding paragraph (l).
    The addition to read as follows:

Sec.  230.497   Filing of investment company prospectuses--number of 
copies.

* * * * *
    (l) Except for an investment company advertisement deemed to be a 
section 10(b) prospectus pursuant to Sec.  230.482 of this chapter, 
this section shall not apply with respect to prospectuses of a 
registered closed-end investment company, or a business development 
company.

PART 232--REGULATION S-T--GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR 
ELECTRONIC FILINGS

0
23. The authority citation for part 232 continues to read, in part, as 
follows:

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77c, 77f, 77g, 77h, 77j, 77s(a), 77z-3, 
77sss(a), 78c(b), 78l, 78m, 78n, 78o(d), 78w(a), 78ll, 80a-6(c), 
80a-8, 80a-29, 80a-30, 80a-37, 7201 et seq.; and 18 U.S.C. 1350, 
unless otherwise noted.
* * * * *
0
24. Amend Sec.  232.405 by:
0
a. Revising the introductory text;
0
b. Revising paragraph (a)(2);
0
c. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (a)(3)(i);
0
d. Revising paragraph (a)(3)(ii);
0
e. Revising paragraph (a)(4);
0
f. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (b)(1);
0
g. Revising paragraph(b)(2);
0
h. Adding new paragraph (b)(3); and
0
i. Revising the last sentence of ``Note to Sec.  232.405:''.
    The revisions and addition to read as follows:

Sec.  232.405   Interactive Data File submissions.

    This section applies to electronic filers that submit Interactive 
Data Files. Section 229.601(b)(101) of this chapter (Item 601(b)(101) 
of Regulation S-K), paragraph (101) of Part II--Information Not 
Required to be Delivered to Offerees or Purchasers of Form F-10 (Sec.  
239.40 of this chapter), paragraph 101 of the Instructions as to 
Exhibits of Form 20-F (Sec.  249.220f of this chapter), paragraph 
B.(15) of the General Instructions to Form 40-F (Sec.  249.240f of this 
chapter), paragraph C.(6) of the General Instructions to Form 6-K 
(Sec.  249.306 of this chapter), General Instruction C.3.(g) of Form N-
1A (Sec. Sec.  239.15A and 274.11A of this chapter), and General 
Instruction H.2 of Form N-2 (Sec. Sec.  239.14 and 274.11a-1 of this 
chapter) specify when electronic filers are required or permitted to 
submit an Interactive Data File (Sec.  232.11), as further described in 
the note to this section. This section imposes content, format and 
submission requirements for an Interactive Data File, but does not 
change the substantive content requirements for the financial and other 
disclosures in the Related Official Filing (Sec.  232.11).
    (a) * * *
    (2) Be submitted only by an electronic filer either required or 
permitted to submit an Interactive Data File as specified by Sec.  
229.601(b)(101) of this chapter (Item 601(b)(101) of Regulation S-K), 
paragraph (101) of Part II--Information Not Required to be Delivered to 
Offerees or Purchasers of Form F-10 (Sec.  239.40 of this chapter), 
paragraph 101 of the Instructions as to Exhibits of Form 20-F (Sec.  
249.220f of this chapter), paragraph B.(15) of the General Instructions 
to Form 40-F (Sec.  249.240f of this chapter), paragraph C.(6) of the 
General Instructions to Form 6-K (Sec.  249.306 of this chapter), 
General Instruction C.3.(g) of Form N-1A (Sec. Sec.  239.15A and 
274.11A of this chapter), or General Instruction H.2 of Form N-2 
(Sec. Sec.  239.14 and 274.11a-1 of this chapter), as applicable;
    (3) * * *
    (i) If the electronic filer is neither a management investment 
company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 
80a et seq.) nor a business development company as defined in section 
2(a)(48) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-
2(a)(48)), and is not within one of the categories specified in 
paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this section, as partly embedded into a filing 
with the remainder simultaneously submitted as an exhibit to:
* * * * *
    (ii) If the electronic filer is a management investment company 
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a et 
seq.) or a business development company as defined in section 2(a)(48) 
of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-2(a)(48)), and is 
not within one of the categories specified in paragraph (f)(1)(ii) of 
this section, as partly embedded into a filing with the remainder 
simultaneously submitted as an exhibit to a filing that contains the 
disclosure this section requires to be tagged; and
    (4) Be submitted in accordance with the EDGAR Filer Manual and, as 
applicable, either Sec.  229.601(b)(101) of this chapter (Item 
601(b)(101) of Regulation S-K), paragraph (101) of Part

[[Page 14519]]

II--Information Not Required to be Delivered to Offerees or Purchasers 
of Form F-10 (Sec.  239.40 of this chapter), paragraph 101 of the 
Instructions as to Exhibits of Form 20-F (Sec.  249.220f of this 
chapter), paragraph B.(15) of the General Instructions to Form 40-F 
(Sec.  249.240f of this chapter), paragraph C.(6) of the General 
Instructions to Form 6-K (Sec.  249.306 of this chapter), General 
Instruction C.3.(g) of Form N-1A (Sec. Sec.  239.15A and 274.11A of 
this chapter), or General Instruction H.2 of Form N-2 (Sec. Sec.  
239.14 and 274.11a-1 of this chapter).
    (b)(1) Content--categories of information presented. If the 
electronic filer is not a management investment company registered 
under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a et seq.), an 
Interactive Data File must consist of only a complete set of 
information for all periods required to be presented in the 
corresponding data in the Related Official Filing, no more and no less, 
from all of the following categories:
* * * * *
    (2) If the electronic filer is an open-end management investment 
company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 
80a et seq.), an Interactive Data File must consist of only a complete 
set of information for all periods required to be presented in the 
corresponding data in the Related Official Filing, no more and no less, 
from the risk/return summary information set forth in Items 2, 3, and 4 
of Form N-1A (Sec. Sec.  239.15A and 274.11A of this chapter).
    (3) If the electronic filer is a closed-end management investment 
company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 
80a et seq.) or a business development company as defined in section 
2(a)(48) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-
2(a)(48)), an Interactive Data File must consist only of a complete set 
of information for all periods required to be presented in the 
corresponding data in the Related Official Filing, no more and no less, 
from: (i) For a business development company, the information specified 
in paragraph (b)(1) of this section; (ii) all of the information 
provided by the electronic filer on the cover page of Form N-2 
(Sec. Sec.  239.14 and 274.11a-1 of this chapter) except the 
Calculation of Registration Fee table, and (iii) as applicable, Items 
3.1, 4.3, 8.2.b, 8.2.d, 8.3.a, 8.3.b, 8.5.b, 8.5.c, 8.5.e, 10.1.a-d, 
10.2.a-c, 10.2.e, 10.3, and 10.5 of Form N-2.
* * * * *
    Note to Sec.  232.405: * * * For an issuer that is a management 
investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 
(15 U.S.C. 80a et seq.) or a business development company as defined in 
section 2(a)(48) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-
2(a)(48)), General Instruction C.3.(g) of Form N-1A (Sec. Sec.  239.15A 
and 274.11A of this chapter) or General Instruction H.2 of Form N-2 
(Sec. Sec.  239.14 and 274.11a-1 of this chapter), as applicable, 
specifies the circumstances under which an Interactive Data File must 
be submitted.

PART 239--FORMS PRESCRIBED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

0
25. The authority citation for part 239 continues to read, in part, as 
follows:

    Authority:  15 U.S.C. 77c, 77f, 77g, 77h, 77j, 77s, 77z-2, 77z-
3, 77sss, 78c, 78l, 78m,78n, 78o(d), 78o-7 note, 78u-5, 78w(a), 
78ll,78mm, 80a-2(a), 80a-3, 80a-8, 80a-9, 80a-10, 80a-13, 80a-24, 
80a-26, 80a-29, 80a-30, and 80a-37; and sec. 107, Pub. L. 112-106, 
126 Stat. 312, unless otherwise noted.
* * * * *

PART 240--GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS, SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 
1934

0
26. The authority citation for part 240 continues to read, in part, as 
follows:

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77c, 77d, 77g, 77j, 77s, 77z-2, 77z-3, 
77eee, 77ggg, 77nnn, 77sss, 77ttt, 78c, 78c-3, 78c-5, 78d, 78e, 78f, 
78g, 78i, 78j, 78j-1, 78k, 78k-1, 78l, 78m, 78n, 78n-1, 78o, 78o-4, 
78o-10, 78p, 78q, 78q-1, 78s, 78u-5, 78w, 78x, 78ll, 78mm, 80a-20, 
80a-23, 80a-29, 80a-37, 80b-3, 80b-4, 80b-11, 7201 et seq.; and 
8302; 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(E); 12 U.S.C. 5221(e)(3); 18 U.S.C. 1350; and 
Pub. L. 111-203, 939A, 124 Stat. 1887 (2010); and secs. 503 and 602, 
Pub. L. 112-106, 126 Stat. 326 (2012), unless otherwise noted.
* * * * *
0
27. Amend Sec.  240.13a-11 by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read 
as follows:

Sec.  240.13a-11   Current reports on Form 8-K (Sec.  249.308 of this 
chapter).

* * * * *
    (b) This section shall not apply to foreign governments, foreign 
private issuers required to make reports on Form 6-K (17 CFR 249.306) 
pursuant to Sec.  240.13a-16, issuers of American Depositary Receipts 
for securities of any foreign issuer, or investment companies required 
to file reports pursuant to Sec.  270.30a-1 of this chapter under the 
Investment Company Act of 1940, except where such an investment company 
is:
    (1) Required to file notice of a blackout period pursuant to Sec.  
245.104 of this chapter;
    (2) Required to file disclosure pursuant to Instruction 2 to Sec.  
240.14a-11(b)(1) of information concerning outstanding shares and 
voting;
    (3) Required to file disclosure pursuant to Instruction 2 to Sec.  
240.14a-11(b)(10) of the date by which a nominating shareholder or 
nominating shareholder group must submit the notice required pursuant 
to Sec.  240.14a-11(b)(10); or
    (4) A closed-end company, as defined in section 5(a)(2) of the 
Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-5(a)(2)), that is 
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et 
seq.).
    (c) No failure to file a report on Form 8-K that is required solely 
pursuant to Item 1.01, 1.02, 2.03, 2.04, 2.05, 2.06, 4.02(a), 5.02(e), 
6.03, 10.02, or 10.03 of Form 8-K shall be deemed to be a violation of 
15 U.S.C. 78j(b) and Sec.  240.10b-5.
* * * * *
0
28. Amend Sec.  240.14a-101 by revising paragraph E of Notes and 
paragraph (b)(1) of Item 13. Financial and other information. (See 
Notes D and E at the beginning of this Schedule.) to read as follows:

Sec.  240.14a-101   Schedule 14A. Information required in proxy 
statement.

Schedule 14A Information

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange 
Act of 1934

* * * * *

Notes

* * * * *
    E. In Item 13 of this Schedule, the reference to ``meets the 
requirement of Form S-3'' or ``meets the requirements of General 
Instruction A.2 of Form N-2'' shall refer to a registrant who meets the 
following requirements:
    (a) A registrant meets the requirements of Form S-3 if:
    (1) The registrant meets the requirements of General Instruction 
I.A. of Form S-3 (Sec.  239.13 of this chapter); and
    (2) One of the following is met:
    (i) The registrant meets the aggregate market value requirement of 
General Instruction I.B.1 of Form S-3; or
    (ii) Action is to be taken as described in Items 11, 12, and 14 of 
this schedule which concerns non-convertible debt or preferred 
securities issued by a registrant meeting the requirements of General 
Instruction I.B.2. of Form S-3

[[Page 14520]]

(referenced in 17 CFR 239.13 of this chapter); or
    (iii) The registrant is a majority-owned subsidiary and one of the 
conditions of General Instruction I.C. of Form S-3 is met.
    (b) A registrant meets the requirements of General Instruction A.2 
of Form N-2 (Sec.  239.14 and Sec.  274.11a-1 of this chapter) if the 
registrant meets the conditions included in such General Instruction, 
provided that General Instruction A.2.c of Form N-2 is subject to the 
same limitations described in paragraph (a)(2) of this Note E.
* * * * *
    Item 13. Financial and other information. (See Notes D and E at the 
beginning of this Schedule.)
* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (1) S-3 registrants and certain N-2 registrants. If the registrant 
meets the requirements of Form S-3 or General Instruction A.2 of Form 
N-2 (see Note E to this Schedule), it may incorporate by reference to 
previously-filed documents any of the information required by paragraph 
(a) of this Item, provided that the requirements of paragraph (c) are 
met. Where the registrant meets the requirements of Form S-3 or General 
Instruction A.2 of Form N-2 and has elected to furnish the required 
information by incorporation by reference, the registrant may elect to 
update the information so incorporated by reference to information in 
subsequently-filed documents.
* * * * *
0
29. Amend Sec.  240.15d-11 by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read 
as follows:

Sec.  240.15d-11  Current reports on Form 8-K (Sec.  249.308 of this 
chapter).

* * * * *
    (b) This section shall not apply to foreign governments, foreign 
private issuers required to make reports on Form 6-K (17 CFR 249.306) 
pursuant to Sec.  240.15d-16, issuers of American Depositary Receipts 
for securities of any foreign issuer, or investment companies required 
to file reports pursuant to Sec.  270.30a-1 of this chapter under the 
Investment Company Act of 1940, except where such an investment company 
is:
    (1) Required to file notice of a blackout period pursuant to Sec.  
245.104 of this chapter;
    (2) Required to file disclosure pursuant to Instruction 2 to Sec.  
240.14a-11(b)(1) of information concerning outstanding shares and 
voting;
    (3) Required to file disclosure pursuant to Instruction 2 to Sec.  
240.14a-11(b)(10) of the date by which a nominating shareholder or 
nominating shareholder group must submit the notice required pursuant 
to Sec.  240.14a-11(b)(10); or
    (4) A closed-end company, as defined in section 5(a)(2) of the 
Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-5(a)(2)), that is 
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et 
seq.).
    (c) No failure to file a report on Form 8-K that is required solely 
pursuant to Item 1.01, 1.02, 2.03, 2.04, 2.05, 2.06, 4.02(a), 5.02(e), 
6.03, 10.02, or 10.03 of Form 8-K shall be deemed to be a violation of 
15 U.S.C. 78j(b) and Sec.  240.10b-5.
* * * * *

PART 243--REGULATION FD

0
30. The authority citation for part 243 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  15 U.S.C. 78c, 78i, 78j, 78m, 78o, 78w, 78mm, and 
80a-29, unless otherwise noted.
* * * * *
0
31. Amend Sec.  243.103 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:

Sec.  243.103   No effect on Exchange Act reporting status.

* * * * *
    (a) For purposes of Forms S-3 (17 CFR 239.13), S-8 (17 CFR 239.16b) 
and SF-3 (17 CFR 239.45) under the Securities Act, or Form N-2 (17 CFR 
239.14 and 17 CFR 274.11a-1) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 
(15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.), an issuer is deemed to have filed all the 
material required to be filed pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) or where 
applicable, has made those filings in a timely manner; or
* * * * *

PART 249--FORMS, SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

0
32. The authority for part 249 continues to read, in part, as follows:

    Authority:  15 U.S.C. 78a et seq. and 7201 et seq.; 12 U.S.C. 
5461 et seq.; 18 U.S.C. 1350; Sec. 953(b), Pub. L. 111-203, 124 
Stat. 1904; Sec. 102(a)(3), Pub. L. 112-106, 126 Stat. 309 (2012); 
Sec. 107, Pub. L. 112-106, 126 Stat. 313 (2012), and Sec. 72001, 
Pub. L. 114-94, 129 Stat. 1312 (2015), unless otherwise noted.
* * * * *
0
33. Amend Form 8-K (referenced in Sec.  249.308 of this chapter) by:
0
a. Revising the first sentence of B.1. of the ``General Instructions'' 
section;
0
b. Adding a new sentence to the end of paragraph B.3. of the ``General 
Instructions'' section;
0
c. Adding ``or the Investment Company Act'' after ``Securities Act'' in 
``General Instruction B.5.'';
0
d. Revising Instruction 4 of ``Item 2.02 Results of Operations and 
Financial Conditions.'';
0
e. Revising Instruction 2 of ``Item 3.02 Unregistered Sales of Equity 
Securities.'';
0
f. Adding new section 10 in the section titled ``INFORMATION TO BE 
INCLUDED IN THE REPORT''.
    The revisions read as follows:

    Note: The text of Form 8-K does not, and these amendments will 
not, appear in the Code of Federal Regulations.

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

Form 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

* * * * *
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
* * * * *
    B. * * *
    1. A report on this form is required to be filed or furnished, as 
applicable, upon the occurrence of any one or more of the events 
specified in the items in Sections 1-6 and 9-10 of this form. * * *
* * * * *
    3. * * * For registered closed-end investment companies, the term 
previously reported has the same meaning as in Rule 8b-2 under the 
Investment Company Act (17 CFR 270.8b-2), provided that such previously 
reported information is public.
* * * * *

INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT

* * * * *

Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition.

* * * * *
    Instructions.
* * * * *
    4. This Item 2.02 does not apply in the case of a disclosure that 
is made in a quarterly report filed with the Commission on Form 10-Q 
(17 CFR 249.308a) or an annual report filed with the Commission on Form 
10-K (17 CFR 249.310) or, for registered closed-end investment 
companies, for reports to stockholders filed with the Commission

[[Page 14521]]

under Rule 30b2-1 of the Investment Company Act.
* * * * *

Item 3.02 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities.

* * * * *
    Instructions.
* * * * *
    2. A smaller reporting company is defined under Item 10(f)(1) of 
Regulation S-K (17 CFR 229.10(f)(1)). For purposes of this Item, a 
``smaller reporting company'' with respect to a closed-end investment 
company described in Section 10 of this form means an investment 
company identified in Rule 0-10 under the Investment Company Act.
* * * * *

Section 10--Closed-End Investment Companies

    The Items in this Section 10 only apply to registered closed-end 
investment companies and to business development companies, as defined 
in Section 2(a)(48) of the Investment Company Act. Terms used in this 
Section 10 have the same meaning as in the Investment Company Act and 
the rules thereunder.

Item 10.01 Material Change to Investment Objectives or Policies

    If the registrant's investment adviser has determined to implement 
a material change to the registrant's investment objectives or 
policies, and such change has not been, and will not be, submitted to 
shareholders for approval, the registrant must disclose:
    (a) The date the investment adviser plans to implement the material 
change to the registrant's investment objectives or policies; and
    (b) a description of the material change to the registrant's 
investment objectives or policies.
    Instructions.
    1. For purposes of this Item, investment objectives or policies 
means the information specified in Item 8.2 of Form N-2. A registrant's 
investment adviser includes any sub-advisers.
    2. A registrant's investment adviser has determined to implement a 
material change if the change would represent a new or different 
principal portfolio emphasis, including the types of securities in 
which the registrant invests or will invest or the significant 
investment practices or techniques that the registrant employs or 
intends to employ, from that most recently disclosed in the later of 
the registrant's prospectus or most recent periodic report. In the case 
of a business development company, the most recent periodic report is 
the most recently filed report on Form 10-Q or Form 10-K. In the case 
of a registered closed-end investment company, the most recent periodic 
report is the most recent report to stockholders filed with the 
Commission under Rule 30b2-1 under the Investment Company Act.
    3. No report is required under this Item if the registrant provides 
substantially the same information in a post-effective amendment to its 
Securities Act registration statement or in a subsequent prospectus 
filed under Securities Act Rule 424 (17 CFR 230.424).

Item 10.02 Material Write-Downs

    If the registrant concludes, in accordance with its valuation 
procedures, that a material write-down in fair value of a significant 
investment is required under generally accepted accounting principles 
applicable to the registrant, disclose the following information:
    (a) The date of the conclusion that a material write-down in fair 
value is required; and
    (b) the registrant's estimate of the amount or range of amounts of 
the material write down; provided, however, that if the registrant 
determines that at the time of filing it is unable in good faith to 
make a determination of such estimate, no disclosure of such estimate 
shall be required; provided further, however, that in any such event, 
the registrant shall file an amended report on Form 8-K under this Item 
10.02 within four business days after it makes a determination of such 
an estimate or range of estimates.
    Instructions.
    1. An investment is deemed to be a significant investment for 
purposes of this Item if the registrant's and its other subsidiaries' 
investments in a portfolio holding exceed 10% of the total assets of 
the registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries. Investments in the 
same issuer must be aggregated for purposes of determining whether the 
registrant and its subsidiaries have a portfolio holding that is a 
significant investment. The determination of whether a portfolio 
holding is a significant investment is based on the valuation of the 
portfolio holding prior to the material write-down.
    2. No filing is required under this Item 10.02 if the conclusion is 
made in connection with the preparation, review, or audit of financial 
statements required to be included in the next periodic report due to 
be filed under the Exchange Act, the periodic report is filed on a 
timely basis, and such conclusion is disclosed in the report.
* * * * *

PART 270--RULES AND REGULATIONS, INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940

0
34. The authority citation for part 270 continues to read, in part, as 
follows:

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq., 80a-34(d), 80a-37, 80a-39, 
and Pub. L. 111-203, sec. 939A, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010), unless 
otherwise noted.
* * * * *
0
35. Amend Sec.  270.8b-16 by adding paragraph (e) to read as follows:

Sec.  270.8b-16   Amendments to registration statement.

* * * * *
    (e) The changes required to be disclosed by paragraphs (b)(2) 
through (b)(5) of this section must be described in enough detail to 
allow investors to understand each change and how it may affect the 
fund. Such disclosures must be prefaced with the following legend: 
``The following information [in this annual report] is a summary of 
certain changes since [date]. This information may not reflect all of 
the changes that have occurred since you purchased [this fund].''
0
36. Amend Sec.  270.23c-3 by adding paragraph (e) to read as follows:

Sec.  270.23c-3   Repurchase offers by closed-end companies.

* * * * *
    (e) Registration of an indefinite amount of securities. A company 
that makes repurchase offers pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section 
shall be deemed to have registered an indefinite amount of securities 
pursuant to section 24(f) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80a-24(f)) upon the 
effective date of its registration statement.
0
37. Amend Sec.  270.24f-2 by revising the first sentence of paragraph 
(a) to read as follows:

Sec.  270.24f-2   Registration under the Securities Act of 1933 of 
certain investment company securities.

    (a) General. Any face-amount certificate company, open-end 
management company, closed-end management company that makes periodic 
repurchase offers pursuant to Sec.  270.23c-3(b) of this chapter, or 
unit investment trust (``issuer'') that is deemed to have registered an 
indefinite amount of securities pursuant to section 24(f) of the Act 
(15 U.S.C. 80a-24(f)) must not later than 90 days after the end of any 
fiscal year during which it has publicly offered such securities, file

[[Page 14522]]

Form 24F-2 (17 CFR 274.24) with the Commission. * * *
* * * * *

PART 274--FORMS PRESCRIBED UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940

0
38. The authority citation for part 274 is revised to read, in part, as 
follows:

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77f, 77g, 77h, 77j, 77s, 78c(b), 78l, 78m, 
78n, 78o(d), 80a-8, 80a-24, 80a-26, 80a-29, Pub. L. 111-203, sec. 
939A, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010), and sec. 803(b), Pub. L. 115-141, 132 
Stat. 348 (2018), unless otherwise noted.
* * * * *
0
39. Revise Form N-2 (referenced in Sec. Sec.  239.14 and 274.11a-1 of 
this chapter) to read as follows:

    Note: The text of Form N-2 does not, and this amendment will 
not, appear in the Code of Federal Regulations.

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM N-2

Check appropriate box or boxes

[ ] REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
[ ] Pre-Effective Amendment No. ____

[ ] Post-Effective Amendment No. ____

and/or

[ ] REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940
[ ] Amendment No. ____

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Registrant Exact Name as Specified in Charter

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Address of Principal Executive Offices (Number, Street, City, State, 
Zip Code)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Registrant's Telephone Number, including Area Code

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Name and Address (Number, Street, City, State, Zip Code) of Agent for 
Service

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Approximate Date of Commencement of Proposed Public Offering

[ ] Check box if the only securities being registered on this Form are 
being offered pursuant to dividend or interest reinvestment plans.
[ ] Check box if any securities being registered on this Form will be 
offered on a delayed or continuous basis in reliance on Rule 415 under 
the Securities Act of 1933 (``Securities Act''), other than securities 
offered in connection with a dividend reinvestment plan.
[ ] Check box if this Form is a registration statement pursuant to 
General Instruction A.2 or a post-effective amendment thereto.
[ ] Check box if this Form is a registration statement pursuant to 
General Instruction B or a post-effective amendment thereto that will 
become effective upon filing with the Commission pursuant to Rule 
462(e) under the Securities Act.
[ ] Check box if this Form is a post-effective amendment to a 
registration statement filed pursuant to General Instruction B filed to 
register additional securities or additional classes of securities 
pursuant to Rule 413(b) under the Securities Act.

It is proposed that this filing will become effective (check 
appropriate box)

[ ] when declared effective pursuant to Section 8(c) of the Securities 
Act

    The following boxes should only be included and completed if the 
registrant is a registered closed-end management investment company or 
business development company which makes periodic repurchase offers 
under Rule 23c-3 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (``Investment 
Company Act'') and is making this filing in accordance with Rule 486 
under the Securities Act.

[ ] immediately upon filing pursuant to paragraph (b)
[ ] on (date) pursuant to paragraph (b)
[ ] 60 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)
[ ] on (date) pursuant to paragraph (a)

If appropriate, check the following box:

[ ] This [post-effective] amendment designates a new effective date for 
a previously filed [post-effective amendment] [registration statement].
[ ] This Form is filed to register additional securities for an 
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, and the 
Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective 
registration statement for the same offering is: ____
[ ] This Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 
462(c) under the Securities Act, and the Securities Act registration 
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for 
the same offering is: ____
[ ] This Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 
462(d) under the Securities Act, and the Securities Act registration 
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for 
the same offering is: ____

Check each box that appropriately characterizes the Fund:

[ ] Registered Closed-End Fund (closed-end company that is registered 
under the Investment Company Act).
[ ] Business Development Company (closed-end company that intends or 
has elected to be regulated as a business development company under the 
Investment Company Act).
[ ] Interval Fund (Registered Closed-End Fund or a Business Development 
Company that makes periodic repurchase offers under Rule 23c-3 under 
the Investment Company Act).
[ ] A.2 Qualified (qualified to register securities pursuant to General 
Instruction A.2 of this Form).
[ ] Well-Known Seasoned Issuer (as defined by Rule 405 under the 
Securities Act).
[ ] Emerging Growth Company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 under the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'').
[ ] New Registrant (registered or regulated under the Investment 
Company Act for less than 12 calendar months preceding this filing).

                        Calculation of Registration Fee Under the Securities Act of 1933
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Proposed maximum   Proposed maximum
Title of securities being registered     Amount being      offering price       aggregate          Amount of
                                          registered          per unit        offering price    registration fee
 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 14523]]

    Instructions.
    If the registration statement or amendment is filed under only one 
of the Acts, omit reference to the other Act from the facing sheet. 
Include the ``Approximate Date of Commencement of Proposed Public 
Offering'' and the table showing the calculation of the registration 
fee only where shares are being registered under the Securities Act.
    If the filing fee is calculated pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the 
Securities Act, only the title of the class of securities to be 
registered, the proposed maximum aggregate offering price for that 
class of securities, and the amount of registration fee need to appear 
in the Calculation of Registration Fee table.
    If the filing fee is calculated pursuant to Rule 457(r) under the 
Securities Act, the Calculation of Registration Fee table must state 
that it registers an unspecified amount of securities of each 
identified class of securities and must provide that the Fund is 
relying on Rule 456(b) and Rule 457(r). If the Calculation of 
Registration Fee table is amended in a post-effective amendment to the 
registration statement or in a prospectus filed in accordance with Rule 
456(b)(1)(ii), the table must specify the aggregate offering price for 
all classes of securities in the referenced offering or offerings and 
the applicable registration fee.
    Any difference between the dollar amount of securities registered 
for such offerings and the dollar amount of securities sold may be 
carried forward on a future registration statement pursuant to Rule 457 
under the Securities Act.
    Fill in the 811-__, 814-__ and 33-__ blanks only if these filing 
numbers (for the Investment Company Act registration and/or the 
Securities Act registration, respectively) have already been assigned 
by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
    Form N-2 is to be used by closed-end management investment 
companies, except small business investment companies licensed as such 
by the United States Small Business Administration, to register under 
the Investment Company Act and to offer their shares under the 
Securities Act. The Commission has designed Form N-2 to provide 
investors with information that will assist them in making a decision 
about investing in an investment company eligible to use the Form. The 
Commission also may use the information provided on Form N-2 in its 
regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policy making roles.
    A Registrant is required to disclose the information specified by 
Form N-2, and the Commission will make this information public. A 
Registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information 
contained in Form N-2 unless the Form displays a currently valid Office 
of Management and Budget (``OMB'') control number. Please direct 
comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden 
estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to Secretary, 
Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the 
clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. 3507.
    Persons who respond to the collection of information contained in 
this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a 
currently valid OMB control number.

Contents of Form N-2

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
A. Use of Form N-2
B. Automatic Shelf Offerings by Well-Known Seasoned Issuers
C. Registration Fees
D. Application of General Rules and Regulations
E. Amendments
F. Incorporation by Reference
G. Documents Comprising the Registration Statement or Amendment
H. Preparation of the Registration Statement or Amendment
I. Registration of Additional Securities
Part A: The Prospectus
Part B: Statement of Additional Information
General Instructions for Parts A and B
Part A--Information Required in a Prospectus
    Item 1. Outside Front Cover
    Item 2. Cover Pages; Other Offering Information
    Item 3. Fee Table and Synopsis
    Item 4. Financial Highlights
    Item 5. Plan of Distribution
    Item 6. Selling Shareholders
    Item 7. Use of Proceeds
    Item 8. General Description of the Registrant
    Item 9. Management
    Item 10. Capital Stock, Long-Term Debt, and Other Securities
    Item 11. Defaults and Arrears on Senior Securities
    Item 12. Legal Proceedings
    Item 13. [Removed and Reserved]
Part B--Information Required in a Statement of Additional Information
    Item 14. Cover Page
    Item 15. Table of Contents
    Item 16. General Information and History
    Item 17. Investment Objective and Policies
    Item 18. Management Instructions
    Item 19. Control Persons and Principal Holders of Securities
    Item 20. Investment Advisory and Other Services
    Item 21. Portfolio Managers
    Item 22. Brokerage Allocation and Other Practices
    Item 23. Tax Status
    Item 24. Financial Statements
Part C--Other Information
    Item 25. Financial Statements and Exhibits
    Item 26. Marketing Arrangements
    Item 27. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distributions
    Item 28. Persons Controlled by or Under Common Control
    Item 29. Number of Holders of Securities
    Item 30. Indemnification
    Item 31. Business and Other Connections of Investment Adviser
    Item 32. Location of Accounts and Records
    Item 33. Management Services
    Item 34. Undertakings
Signatures

General Instructions

A. Use of Form N-2

    1. General. Form N-2 is used by all closed-end management 
investment companies (``Registrant'' or ``Fund''), except small 
business investment companies licensed as such by the United States 
Small Business Administration, to file: (1) An initial registration 
statement under Section 8(b) of the Investment Company Act and any 
amendments to the registration statement, including amendments required 
by Rule 8b-16 under the Investment Company Act; (2) a registration 
statement under the Securities Act and any amendment to it; or (3) any 
combination of these filings.
    2. Optional Use of Form for Certain Funds. A Fund may elect to file 
a registration statement pursuant to this General Instruction A.2, 
including a registration statement used in connection with an offering 
pursuant to Rule 415(a)(1)(x) under the Securities Act, if it meets all 
of the following requirements:
    a. The Fund meets the requirements of General Instruction I.A. of 
Form S-3, provided that failing to timely file a report required solely 
pursuant to Items 10.01 or 10.02 of Form 8-K will not affect the Fund's 
ability to meet the terms of General Instruction I.A.3(b) of Form S-3;
    b. if the Fund is registered under the Investment Company Act, it 
has been registered for a period of at least twelve

[[Page 14524]]

calendar months immediately preceding the filing of the registration 
statement on this Form, and has timely filed all reports required to be 
filed pursuant to Section 30 of the Investment Company Act during the 
twelve calendar months and any portion of a month immediately preceding 
the filing of the registration statement; and
    c. the registration statement to be filed pursuant to this General 
Instruction A.2 relates to a transaction specified in General 
Instruction I.B. or I.C of Form S-3, as applicable, and meets all of 
the conditions to the transaction specified in the applicable 
instruction.
    A registration statement filed pursuant to this instruction shall 
specifically incorporate by reference into the prospectus and statement 
of additional information (``SAI'') all of the materials specified in 
General Instruction F.3, pursuant to the requirements set forth in that 
instruction.
    A Fund must indicate that the registration statement is being filed 
pursuant to this instruction by checking the appropriate box on the 
facing sheet.

    Note to General Instruction A.2. Attention is directed to the 
General Instructions of Form S-3, including General Instructions 
II.D, F, and G, which contain general information regarding the 
preparation and filing of automatic and non-automatic shelf 
registration statements.

B. Automatic Shelf Offerings by Well-Known Seasoned Issuers

    Any Fund that is a Well-Known Seasoned Issuer as defined in Rule 
405 of the Securities Act at the most recent eligibility determination 
date specified in paragraph (2) of that definition may use a 
registration statement filed under General Instruction A.2 of this Form 
as an automatic shelf registration statement for registration under the 
Securities Act of securities offerings, other than pursuant to Rule 
415(a)(1)(vii) or (viii) of the Securities Act, only for the 
transactions that are described in, and consistent with the 
requirements of, General Instruction I.D. of Form S-3.

    Note to General Instruction B. Attention is directed to the 
General Instructions of Form S-3, including General Instructions 
II.E, F, G and IV.B, which contain general information regarding the 
preparation and filing of automatic shelf registration statements.

C. Registration Fees

    Section 6(b) of the Securities Act and Rule 457 thereunder set 
forth the fee requirements under the Securities Act.

D. Application of General Rules and Regulations

    If the registration statement is being filed under both the 
Securities and Investment Company Acts or under only the Securities 
Act, the General Rules and Regulations under the Securities Act, 
particularly Regulation C [17 CFR 230.400 through 497], shall apply. If 
the registration statement is being filed under only the Investment 
Company Act, the General Rules and Regulations under the Investment 
Company Act, particularly those under Section 8(b) [17 CFR 270.8b-1 et 
seq.], shall apply.

E. Amendments

    1. Paragraph (a) of Rule 8b-16 under the Investment Company Act 
requires closed-end management investment companies to annually amend 
the Investment Company Act registration statement. Paragraph (b) of 
Rule 8b-16 exempts a closed-end management investment company from this 
requirement if it provides certain information specified by that rule 
to shareholders in its annual report.
    2. If Form N-2 is used to file a registration statement under both 
the Securities and Investment Company Acts, any amendment of that 
registration statement shall be deemed to be filed under both Acts 
unless otherwise indicated on the facing sheet.
    3. Funds offering securities on a delayed or continuous basis in 
reliance upon Rule 415 under the Securities Act must provide the 
undertakings with respect to post-effective amendments required by Item 
34 of Form N-2.
    4. A post-effective amendment to a registration statement on this 
Form, or a registration statement filed for the purpose of registering 
additional shares of common stock for which a registration statement 
filed on this Form is effective, filed on behalf of a Fund which makes 
periodic repurchase offers pursuant to Rule 23c-3 under the Investment 
Company Act may become effective automatically in accordance with Rule 
486 under the Securities Act. In accordance with Rule 429 under the 
Securities Act, a Fund filing a new registration statement for the 
purpose of registering additional shares of common stock may use a 
prospectus with respect to the additional shares also in connection 
with the shares covered by earlier registration statements if such 
prospectus includes all of the information which would currently be 
required in a prospectus relating to the securities covered by the 
earlier statements. The filing fee required by the Securities Act and 
Rule 457 under the Securities Act shall be paid with respect to the 
additional shares only.

F. Incorporation by Reference

    1. General Requirements. Incorporation by reference must comply 
with the requirements of this Form and the following rules on 
incorporation by reference: Rule 411 under the Securities Act (general 
rules on incorporation by reference into a prospectus); Rule 303 of 
Regulation S-T (specific requirements for electronically filed 
documents); and Rules 0-4, 8b-23, 8b-24 and 8b-32 under the Investment 
Company Act (additional rules on incorporation by reference for Funds).
    2. Specific Requirements for Incorporation by Reference for Funds 
Not Relying on General Instruction A.2.
    a. A Fund may not incorporate by reference into a prospectus 
information that Part A of this Form requires to be included in a 
prospectus, except as specifically permitted by Part A of this Form or 
paragraph F.2.d below.
    b. A Fund may incorporate by reference any or all of the SAI into 
the prospectus (but not to provide any information required by Part A 
to be included in the prospectus) without delivering the SAI with the 
prospectus.
    c. A Fund may incorporate by reference into the SAI or its response 
to Part C, information that Parts B and C require to be included in the 
Fund's registration statement.
    d. A Fund may incorporate by reference into the prospectus or the 
SAI in response to Items 4.1 or 24 of this Form the information 
contained in Form N-CSR or any report to shareholders meeting the 
requirements of Section 30(e) of the Investment Company Act and Rule 
30e-1 thereunder (and a Fund that has elected to be regulated as a 
business development company may so incorporate into Items 4.1, 4.2, 
8.6.c, or 24 of this Form the information contained in its annual 
report under the Exchange Act), provided:
    (1) the material incorporated by reference is prepared in 
accordance with, and covers the periods specified by, this Form; and
    (2) the Fund states in the prospectus or the SAI, at the place 
where the information required by Items 4.1, 4.2, 8.6.c., or 24 of this 
Form would normally appear, that the information is incorporated by 
reference from a report to shareholders or a report on Form N-CSR or an 
annual report on Form 10-K. (The Fund also may describe briefly, in 
either the prospectus, the SAI, or Part C of the registration statement 
(in response to Item 25.1) those portions of the report to shareholders 
or report on Form N-CSR or Form 10-K that are not

[[Page 14525]]

incorporated by reference and are not a part of the registration 
statement.)
    3. Specific Requirements for Incorporation by Reference for Certain 
Funds. If a Fund is filing a registration statement pursuant to General 
Instruction A.2, the following requirements apply:
    a. Backward Incorporation by Reference. The documents listed in (1) 
and (2) below shall be specifically incorporated by reference into the 
prospectus and SAI by means of a statement to that effect in the 
prospectus and SAI listing all such documents:
    (1) The Fund's latest annual report filed pursuant to Section 13(a) 
or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act that contains financial statements 
for the fund's latest fiscal year for which a Form N-CSR or Form 10-K 
was required to be filed;
    (2) all other reports filed pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of 
the Exchange Act since the end of the fiscal year covered by the annual 
report referred to in (1) above; and
    (3) if capital stock is to be registered and securities of the same 
class are registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, the 
description of such class of securities which is contained in a 
registration statement filed under the Exchange Act, including any 
amendment or reports filed for the purpose of updating such 
description.
    b. Forward Incorporation by Reference. The prospectus and SAI shall 
also state that all documents subsequently filed by the Fund pursuant 
to Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, prior to the 
termination of the offering shall be deemed to be incorporated by 
reference into the prospectus and SAI.
    c. Use of Information to be Incorporated. Any information required 
in the prospectus and SAI in response to Items 3-13 and Items 16-24 of 
this Form may be included in the prospectus and SAI through documents 
filed pursuant to Sections 13(a), 14, or 15(d) of the Exchange Act that 
are incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the 
prospectus and SAI that are part of the registration statement.
    Instruction. Attention is directed to Rule 439 under the Securities 
Act regarding consent to use of material incorporated by reference.
    4. Disclosure.
    a. The Fund must make its prospectus, SAI, and any periodic and 
current reports filed pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the 
Exchange Act that are incorporated by reference readily available and 
accessible on a website maintained by or for the Fund and containing 
information about the Fund.
    b. The Fund must state in its prospectus and SAI:
    (1) That it will provide to each person, including any beneficial 
owner, to whom a prospectus or SAI is delivered, a copy of any or all 
information that has been incorporated by reference into the prospectus 
or SAI but not delivered with the prospectus or SAI;
    (2) that it will provide this information upon written or oral 
request;
    (3) that it will provide this information at no charge;
    (4) the name, address, telephone number, and email address, if any, 
to which the request for this information must be made; and
    (5) the Fund's website address where the prospectus, SAI, and any 
incorporated information may be accessed.
    Instruction. If the Fund sends any of the information that is 
incorporated by reference into the prospectus or SAI to security 
holders, it also must send any exhibits that are specifically 
incorporated by reference into that information.
    c. The Fund also must:
    (1) Identify the reports and other information that it files with 
the SEC; and
    (2) state that the SEC maintains an internet site that contains 
reports, proxy and information statements, and other information 
regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC and state the 
address of that site (http://www.sec.gov).

G. Documents Comprising the Registration Statement or Amendment

    1. A registration statement or an amendment to it filed under both 
the Securities and Investment Company Acts consists of the facing sheet 
of the Form, Part A, Part B, Part C, required signatures, all other 
documents filed as a part of the registration statement, and documents 
or information permitted to be incorporated by reference.
    2. A registration statement or amendment to it that is filed under 
only the Securities Act shall contain all the information and documents 
specified in paragraph 1 of this Instruction G.
    3. A registration statement or an amendment to it that is filed 
under only the Investment Company Act shall consist of the facing sheet 
of the Form, responses to all items of Parts A and B except Items 1, 2, 
3.2, 4, 5, 6, and 7 of Part A, responses to all items of Part C except 
Items 25.2.h, 25.2.l, 25.2.n, and 25.2.o, required signatures, and all 
other documents that are required or which the Fund may file as part of 
the registration statement.

H. Preparation of the Registration Statement or Amendment

    1. The following instructions for completing Form N-2 are divided 
into three parts. Part A relates to the prospectus required by Section 
10(a) of the Securities Act. Part B relates to the SAI that must be 
provided upon request to recipients of the prospectus. Part C relates 
to other information that is required to be in the registration 
statement.
    2. Interactive Data Files.
    a. An Interactive Data File as defined in Rule 11 of Regulation S-T 
is required to be submitted to the Commission in the manner provided by 
Rule 405 of Regulation S-T for any registration statement or post-
effective amendment thereto on Form N-2 containing the cover page 
information specified in Rule 405 of Regulation S-T. The Interactive 
Data File must be submitted either with the filing, or as an amendment 
to the registration statement to which it relates that is submitted on 
or before the date the registration statement or post-effective 
amendment that contains the related information becomes effective.
    b. An Interactive Data File is required to be submitted to the 
Commission in the manner provided by Rule 405 of Regulation S-T for any 
form of prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424 under the Securities Act 
that includes information provided in response to Items 3.1, 4.3, 
8.2.b, 8.2.d, 8.3.a, 8.3.b, 8.5.b, 8.5.c, 8.5.e, 10.1.a-d, 10.2.a-c, 
10.2.e, 10.3, or 10.5 that varies from the registration statement. The 
Interactive Data File must be submitted with the filing made pursuant 
to Rule 424.
    c. If a Fund is filing a registration statement pursuant to General 
Instruction A.2, an Interactive Data File is required to be submitted 
to the Commission in the manner provided by Rule 405 of Regulation S-T 
for any of the documents listed in General Instruction F.3.a or General 
Instruction F.3.b that include or amend information provided in 
response to Items 3.1, 4.3, 8.2.b, 8.2.d, 8.3.a, 8.3.b, 8.5.b, 8.5.c, 
8.5.e, 10.1.a-d, 10.2.a-c, 10.2.e, 10.3, or 10.5. The Interactive Data 
File must be submitted with the filing of the document(s) listed in 
General Instruction F.3.a or General Instruction F.3.b.
    d. The Interactive Data File must be submitted in accordance with 
the specifications in the EDGAR Filer Manual, and must be submitted in 
such a manner that--for any information that does not relate to all of 
the classes of a

[[Page 14526]]

Fund--will permit each class of the Fund to be separately identified.

I. Registration of Additional Securities

    With respect to the registration of additional securities for an 
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, the Fund may 
file a registration statement consisting only of the following: The 
facing page; a statement that the contents of the earlier registration 
statement, identified by file number, are incorporated by reference; 
required opinions and consents; the signature page; and any price-
related information omitted from the earlier registration statement in 
reliance on Rule 430A that the Fund chooses to include in the new 
registration statement. The information contained in such a Rule 462(b) 
registration statement shall be deemed to be part of the earlier 
registration statement as of the date of effectiveness of the Rule 
462(b) registration statement. Any opinion or consent required in such 
a registration statement may be incorporated by reference from the 
earlier registration statement with respect to the offering, if: (i) 
Such opinion or consent expressly provides for such incorporation; and 
(ii) such opinion relates to the securities registered pursuant to Rule 
462(b). See Rules 411(c), 439(b), and 483(c) under the Securities Act.

Part A: The Prospectus

    The purpose of the prospectus is to provide essential information 
about the Fund in a way that will help investors make informed 
decisions about whether to purchase the securities being offered. The 
information in the prospectus should be clear, concise, and 
understandable. avoid the use of technical or legal terms, complex 
language, or excessive detail.
    Responses to the items of Part A should be as simple and direct as 
possible and should include only information needed to understand the 
fundamental characteristics of the Fund. Descriptions of practices that 
are required by law generally should not include detailed discussions 
of the law itself. No response is required for inapplicable items.

Part B: Statement of Additional Information

    The items in Part B call for additional information about the Fund 
that may be of interest to some investors. Part B also allows the Fund 
to augment discussions of matters described in the prospectus with 
additional information the Fund believes may be of interest to some 
investors. If information is included in the prospectus, it need not be 
repeated in the SAI, and a Fund need not prepare a SAI or refer to it 
in the prospectus (or provide the undertaking required by Item 34.8) if 
all of the information required to be in the SAI is included in the 
prospectus. A Fund placing information in Part B should not repeat 
information that is in the prospectus, except where necessary to make 
Part B understandable.
    Information in the SAI need not be included in the prospectus or be 
sent to investors with the prospectus provided that the cover page of 
the prospectus states that the SAI is available upon oral or written 
request and without charge, and includes a toll-free telephone number 
and email address, if any, for use by prospective investors to request 
the SAI. If the request is made prior to delivery of a confirmation 
with respect to a security offered by the prospectus, the SAI must be 
sent in a manner reasonably calculated for it to arrive prior to the 
confirmation. The SAI may be sent to the address to which the 
prospectus was delivered, unless the requester provides an alternate 
address for delivery of the SAI.

General Instructions for Parts A and B

    1. The information in the prospectus and the SAI should be 
organized to make it easy to understand the organization and operation 
of the Fund. The information need not be in any particular order, with 
the exception that Items 1, 2, 3, and 4 must appear in order in the 
prospectus and may not be preceded or separated by any other 
information.
    2. The prospectus or the SAI may contain more information than 
called for by this Form, provided the information is not incomplete, 
inaccurate, or misleading and does not, because of its nature, 
quantity, or manner of presentation, obscure or impede understanding of 
required information.
    3. The requirements for dating the prospectus apply equally to 
dating the SAI for purposes of Rule 423 under the Securities Act. The 
SAI should be made available at the same time that the prospectus 
becomes available for purposes of Rules 430 and 460 under the 
Securities Act.
    4. The prospectus should not be presented in fold-out or road-map 
type fashion.
    5. Instructions for charts, graphs, and sales literature:
    (a) A registration statement may include any chart, graph, or table 
that is not misleading; however, only the fee table and the table of 
contents (required by Rule 481(c) under the Securities Act) may precede 
the financial highlights specified in Item 4.
    (b) If ``sales literature'' is included in the prospectus, (1) it 
should not significantly lengthen the prospectus nor obscure essential 
disclosure, and (2) members of the Financial Industry Regulatory 
Authority (``FINRA'') are not relieved of the filing and other FINRA 
requirements for investment company sales literature. (See Securities 
Act Release No. 5359, Jan. 26, 1973 [38 FR 7220 (Mar. 19, 1973)].)

Part A--Information Required in a Prospectus

Item 1. Outside Front Cover

    1. The outside front cover must contain the following information:
    a. The Fund's name;
    b. identification of the type of Fund (e.g., bond fund, balanced 
fund, business development company, etc.) or a brief statement of the 
Fund's investment objective(s);
    c. the title and amount of securities offered and a brief 
description of such securities (unless not necessary to indicate the 
material terms of the securities, as in the case of an issue of common 
stock with full voting rights and the dividend and liquidation rights 
usually associated with common stock);
    d. a statement that (A) the prospectus sets forth concisely the 
information about the Fund that a prospective investor ought to know 
before investing; (B) the prospectus should be retained for future 
reference; and (C) additional information about the Fund has been filed 
with the Commission and is available upon written or oral request and 
without charge (this statement should explain how to obtain the SAI, 
and whether any of it has been incorporated by reference into the 
prospectus). This statement should also explain how to obtain the 
Fund's annual and semi-annual reports to shareholders. Provide a toll-
free (or collect) telephone number for investors to call, and email 
address, if any, to request the Fund's SAI; annual report; semi-annual 
report; or other information about the Fund; and to make shareholder 
inquiries. Also state whether the Fund makes available its SAI and 
annual and semi-annual reports, free of charge, on or through the 
Fund's website at a specified internet address. If the Fund does not 
make its SAI and shareholder reports available in this manner, disclose 
the reasons why it does not do so (including, where applicable, that 
the Fund does not have an internet website). Also include the 
information that the Commission maintains a website (http://

[[Page 14527]]

www.sec.gov) that contains the SAI, material incorporated by reference, 
and other information regarding funds;
    e. the date of the prospectus and the date of the Statement of 
Additional Information;
    f. if any of the securities being registered are to be offered for 
the account of shareholders, a statement to that effect;
    g. information in substantially the tabular form indicated as to 
all securities being registered that are to be offered for cash 
(estimate, if necessary):

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      Proceeds to registrant or
                   Price to public                             Sales load                   other persons
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per Share
                                                     -----------------------------------------------------------
    Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Instructions.
    1. If it is impracticable to state the price to the public, briefly 
explain how the price will be determined (e.g., by reference to net 
asset value). If the securities will be offered at the market, indicate 
the market involved and the market price as of the latest practicable 
date.
    2. The term ``sales load'' is defined in Section 2(a)(35) of the 
Investment Company Act. Subject to Instruction 3, only include the 
portion of the sales load that consists of underwriting discounts and 
commissions, and include any commissions paid by selling shareholders 
(the term ``commissions'' is defined in paragraph l7 of Schedule A of 
the Securities Act). Commissions paid by other persons and other 
consideration to underwriters shall be noted in the second column and 
briefly described in a footnote.
    3. Include in the table as sales load amounts borrowed to pay 
underwriting discounts and commissions or any other offering costs that 
are required to be repaid in less than one year. Exclude from the 
table, but include in a note thereto, the amount of funds borrowed to 
pay such costs that are required to be repaid in more than one year, 
and provide a cross-reference to the prospectus discussion of the 
borrowed amounts and the effect of repayment on fund assets available 
for investment.
    4. Where an underwriter has received an over-allotment option, 
present maximum-minimum information in the price table or in a note 
thereto, based on the purchase of all or none of the shares subject to 
the option. The terms of the option may be described briefly in 
response to Item 5 rather than on the prospectus cover page.
    5. If the securities are to be offered on a best efforts basis, set 
forth the termination date of the offering, any minimum required 
purchase, and any arrangements to place the funds received in an 
escrow, trust, or similar arrangement. If no arrangements have been 
made, so state. Set forth the following table in lieu of the ``Total'' 
information called for by the required table.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      Proceeds to registrant or
                   Price to public                             Sales load                   other persons
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Minimum
                                                     -----------------------------------------------------------
Total Maximum
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    6. Set forth in a note to the proceeds column the total of other 
expenses of issuance and distribution called for by Item 27, stated 
separately for the Fund and for the selling shareholders, if any.
    h. the statements required by paragraphs (1) and (2) of Rule 481(b) 
under the Securities Act;
    i. if the Fund's securities have no history of public trading, a 
prominent statement to that effect and a statement describing the 
tendency of closed-end fund shares to trade frequently at a discount 
from net asset value and the risk of loss this creates for investors 
purchasing shares in the initial public offering;
    Instruction. A Fund may omit the discount statement if it believes 
that, as a result of its investment or other policies, its capital 
structure, or the markets in which its shares trade, its shares are 
unlikely to trade at a discount from net asset value.
    j. a cross-reference to the prospectus discussion of any factors 
that make the offering speculative or one of high risk, printed in bold 
face common type at least as large as ten point modern type and at 
least two points leaded; and
    Instruction. No cross-reference is required where the risks 
associated with securities in which the Fund is authorized to invest 
are only the basic risks of investing in securities (e.g., the risk 
that the value of portfolio securities may fluctuate depending upon 
market conditions, or the risks that debt securities may be prepaid and 
the proceeds from the prepayments invested in debt instruments with 
lower interest rates). Include the cross-reference if the nature of the 
Fund's investment objectives, investment policies, capital structure, 
or the trading markets for the Fund's securities increase the 
likelihood that an investor could lose a significant portion of his or 
her investment.
    k. any other information required by Commission rules or by any 
other governmental authority having jurisdiction over the Fund or the 
issuance of its securities.
    l. A statement to the following effect, if applicable:
    Beginning on [date], as permitted by regulations adopted by the 
Securities and Exchange Commission, paper copies of the Registrant's 
shareholder reports will no longer be sent by mail, unless you 
specifically request paper copies of the reports from the Registrant 
[or from your financial intermediary, such as a broker-dealer or bank]. 
Instead, the reports will be made available on a website, and you will 
be notified by mail each time a report is posted and provided with a 
website link to access the report.
    If you already elected to receive shareholder reports 
electronically, you will not be affected by this change and you need 
not take any action. You may

[[Page 14528]]

elect to receive shareholder reports and other communications from the 
Registrant [or your financial intermediary] electronically by [insert 
instructions].
    You may elect to receive all future reports in paper free of 
charge. You can inform the Registrant [or your financial intermediary] 
that you wish to continue receiving paper copies of your shareholder 
reports by [insert instructions]. Your election to receive reports in 
paper will apply to all funds held with [the fund complex/your 
financial intermediary].
    2. The cover page may include other information if it does not, by 
its nature, quantity, or manner of presentation impede understanding of 
the required information.

Item 2. Cover Pages; Other Offering Information

    1. Disclose whether any national securities exchange or the Nasdaq 
Stock Market lists the securities offered, naming the particular 
market(s), and identify the trading symbol(s) for those securities on 
the inside front or outside back cover page of the prospectus, unless 
the information appears on the front cover page.
    2. Provide the information required by paragraph (d) of Rule 481 
under the Securities Act in an appropriate place in the prospectus.
    3. Provide the information required by paragraph (e) of Rule 481 
under the Securities Act on the outside back cover page of the 
prospectus.

Item 3. Fee Table and Synopsis

    1. If the prospectus offers common stock of the Fund, include 
information about the costs and expenses that the investor will bear 
directly or indirectly, using the captions and tabular format 
illustrated below:

 
 
 
Shareholder Transaction Expenses:
    Sales Load (as a percentage of offering                    ________%
     price)....................................
    Dividend Reinvestment and Cash Purchase                    ________%
     Plan Fees.................................
Annual Expenses (as a percentage of net assets
 attributable to common shares):
    Management Fees............................                ________%
    Interest Payments on Borrowed Funds........                ________%
    Other expenses.............................                ________%
        ________________________                               ________%
        ________________________                               ________%
        ________________________                               ________%
    Total Annual Expenses......................                ________%
 

 
               Example                      1 year            3 years            5 years            10 years
 
You would pay the following expenses           $______%           $______%           $______%           $______%
 on a $1,000 investment, assuming a
 5% annual return:
 

    Instructions.
    General Instructions
    1. Immediately after the table, provide a brief narrative 
explaining that the purpose of the table is to assist the investor in 
understanding the various costs and expenses that an investor in the 
fund will bear directly or indirectly. Include, where appropriate, 
cross-references to the relevant sections of the prospectus for more 
complete descriptions of the various costs and expenses.
    2. Any caption not applicable to the Fund may be omitted from the 
table.
    3. Round all dollar figures to the nearest dollar and all 
percentages to the nearest hundredth of one percent.
    Shareholder Transaction Expenses
    4. ``Dividend Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Plan Fees'' include 
all fees (except brokerage commissions) that are charged to 
participating shareholder accounts. The basis on which such fees are 
imposed should be described briefly in a note to the table.
    5. If the Fund (or any other party under an agreement with the 
Fund) charges any other transaction fee, add another caption describing 
it, and list the maximum amount of the fee or basis on which the fee is 
deducted. Underwriters' compensation that is paid with the proceeds of 
debt that is not to be repaid within one year need not be identified as 
sales load, but should be set forth as a shareholder transaction 
expense with a brief narrative following the table explaining the 
nature of such payments.
    Annual Expenses
    6. State the basis on which payments will be made. ``Other 
Expenses'' should be estimated and stated (after any expense 
reimbursement or waiver) as a percentage of net asset value 
attributable to common shares. State in the narrative following the 
table that ``Other Expenses'' are based on estimated amounts for the 
current fiscal year.
    7. a. ``Management Fees'' include investment advisory fees 
(including any component thereof based on the performance of the Fund), 
any other management fees payable to the investment adviser or its 
affiliates, and administrative fees payable to the investment adviser 
or its affiliates not included as ``Other Expenses,'' and any expenses 
incurred within the Fund's own organization in connection with the 
research, selection, and supervision of investments. Where management 
fees are ``tiered'' or based on a ``sliding scale,'' they should be 
calculated based on the fund's asset size after giving effect to the 
anticipated net proceeds of the present offering. In the case of a 
performance fee arrangement, assume the base fee. With respect to a 
best-efforts offering with breakpoints, assume the maximum fee will be 
payable.
    b. In lieu of the information about management fees required by 
Item 3.1, a business development company with a fee structure that is 
not based solely on the aggregate amount of assets under management 
should provide disclosure concerning the fee arrangement to allow 
investors to assess its impact on the Fund's expenses; a business 
development company may use any appropriate expense categories and may 
include items that may not, for accounting purposes, be treated as 
expenses. A business development company with special fee arrangements 
should provide a cross-reference, where applicable, to the discussion 
in Item 9.1.a of special management compensation plans.
    8. ``Interest Payments on Borrowed Funds'' include all interest 
paid in connection with outstanding loans (including interest paid on 
funds borrowed to pay underwriting expenses), bonds, or other forms of 
debt. Show interest expenses as a percentage of net assets attributable 
to common shares and not the face amount of debt.
    9. ``Other Expenses'' include all expenses (except fees and 
expenses reported in other items in the table) that are deducted from 
the Fund's assets and will be reflected as expenses in the Fund's 
statement of operations

[[Page 14529]]

(including increases resulting from complying with paragraph 2(g) of 
Rule 6-07 [17 CFR 210.6-07] of Regulation S-X).
    10. a. If the Fund invests, or intends to invest based upon the 
anticipated net proceeds of the present offering, in shares of one or 
more ``Acquired Funds,'' add a subcaption to the ``Annual Expenses'' 
portion of the table directly above the subcaption titled ``Total 
Annual Expenses.'' Title the additional subcaption: ``Acquired Fund 
Fees and Expenses.'' Disclose in the subcaption fees and expenses 
incurred indirectly by the Fund as a result of investment in shares of 
one or more Acquired Funds. For purposes of this Item, an ``Acquired 
Fund'' means any company in which the Fund invests or intends to invest 
(A) that is an investment company or (B) that would be an investment 
company under Section 3(a) of the Investment Company Act but for the 
exceptions to that definition provided for in Sections 3(c)(1) and 
3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act. If a Fund uses another term in 
response to other requirements of this Form to refer to Acquired Funds, 
it may include that term in parentheses following the subcaption title. 
In the event the fees and expenses incurred indirectly by the Fund as a 
result of investment in shares of one or more Acquired Funds do not 
exceed 0.01 percent (one basis point) of average net assets of the 
Fund, the Fund may include these fees and expenses under the subcaption 
``Other Expenses'' in lieu of this disclosure requirement.
    b. Determine the ``Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses'' according to 
the following formula:

 
 
 
  AFFE = [(F1/FY) * AI1 * D1] + [(F2/FY) * AI2 * D2] + [(F3/FY) * AI3 *
             D3] + Transaction Fees + Incentive Allocations
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Average Net Assets of the Fund
 
Where:
 
AFFE..............................  Acquired Fund fees and expenses;
F1, F2, F3, . . ..................  Total annual operating expense ratio
                                     for each Acquired Fund;
FY................................  Number of days in the relevant
                                     fiscal year;
AI1, AI2, AI3, . . ...............  Average invested balance in each
                                     Acquired Fund;
D1, D2, D3, . . ..................  Number of days invested in each
                                     Acquired Fund;
``Transaction Fees''..............  The total amount of sales loads,
                                     redemption fees, or other
                                     transaction fees paid by the Fund
                                     in connection with acquiring or
                                     disposing of shares in any Acquired
                                     Funds during the most recent fiscal
                                     year; and
``Incentive Allocations''.........  Any allocation of capital from the
                                     Acquiring Fund to the adviser of
                                     the Acquired Fund (or its
                                     affiliate) based on a percentage of
                                     the Acquiring Fund's income,
                                     capital gains and/or appreciation
                                     in the Acquired Fund.
 

    c. Calculate the average net assets of the Fund for the most recent 
fiscal year, as provided in Item 4.1 (see Instruction 15 to Item 4.1), 
and include the anticipated net proceeds of the present offering.
    d. The total annual operating expense ratio used for purposes of 
this calculation (F1) is the annualized ratio of operating expenses to 
average net assets for the Acquired Fund's most recent fiscal period as 
disclosed in the Acquired Fund's most recent shareholder report. If the 
ratio of expenses to average net assets is not included in the most 
recent shareholder report or the Acquired Fund is a newly formed fund 
that has not provided a shareholder report, then the ratio of expenses 
to average net assets of the Acquired Fund is the ratio of total annual 
operating expenses to average annual net assets of the Acquired Fund 
for its most recent fiscal period as disclosed in the most recent 
communication from the Acquired Fund to the Fund. If the Fund has a 
written fee agreement with the Acquired Fund that would affect the 
ratio of expenses to average net assets as disclosed in the Acquired 
Fund's most recent shareholder report, the Fund should determine the 
ratio of expenses to average net assets for the Acquired Fund's most 
recent fiscal period using the written fee agreement. For purposes of 
this instruction: (i) Acquired Fund expenses include increases 
resulting from brokerage service and expense offset arrangements and 
reductions resulting from fee waivers or reimbursements by the Acquired 
Funds' investment advisers or sponsors; and (ii) Acquired Fund expenses 
do not include any expenses (i.e., performance fees) that are 
calculated solely upon the realization and/or distribution of gains, or 
the sum of the realization and/or distribution of gains and unrealized 
appreciation of assets distributed in-kind. If an Acquired Fund has no 
operating history, include in the Acquired Funds' expenses any fees 
payable to the Acquired Fund's investment adviser or its affiliates 
stated in the Acquired Fund's registration statement, offering 
memorandum or other similar communication without giving effect to any 
performance.
    e. If a Fund has made investments in the most recent fiscal year, 
to determine the average invested balance (AI1), the numerator is the 
sum of the amount initially invested in an Acquired Fund during the 
most recent fiscal year (if the investment was held at the end of the 
previous fiscal year, use the amount invested as of the end of the 
previous fiscal year) and the amounts invested in the Acquired Fund no 
less frequently than monthly during the period the investment is held 
by the Fund (if the investment was held through the end of the fiscal 
year, use each month-end through and including the fiscal year-end). 
Divide the numerator by the number of measurement points included in 
the calculation of the numerator (i.e., if an investment is made during 
the fiscal year and held for 3 succeeding months, the denominator would 
be 4).
    f. For investments based upon the anticipated net proceeds from the 
present offering, base the ``Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses'' on: (i) 
Assumptions about specific funds in which the Fund expects to invest, 
(ii) estimates of the amount of assets the Fund expects to invest in 
each of those Acquired Funds, and (iii) an assumption that the 
investment was held for all of the Fund's most recent fiscal year and 
was subject to the Acquired Funds' fees and expenses for that year. 
Disclose in a footnote to the table that Acquired Fund fees and 
expenses are based on estimated amounts for the current fiscal year.
    g. If an Acquired Fund charges an Incentive Allocation or any other 
fee based on income, capital gains and/or appreciation (i.e., 
performance fee), the Fund must include a footnote to the ``Acquired 
Fund Fees and Expenses'' subcaption that:
    (1) Discloses the typical Incentive Allocation or such other fee 
(expressed as a percentage) to be paid to the investment advisers of 
the Acquired Funds (or an affiliate);
    (2) discloses that Acquired Funds' fees and expenses are based on 
historic fees and expenses; and
    (3) states that future Acquired Funds' fees and expenses may be 
substantially higher or lower because certain fees are based on the 
performance of the Acquired Funds, which may fluctuate over time.

[[Page 14530]]

    h. If the Fund is a Feeder Fund, reflect the aggregate expenses of 
the Feeder Fund and the Master Fund in the ``Acquired Fund Fees and 
Expenses.'' The aggregate expenses of the Master-Feeder Fund must 
include the fees and expenses incurred indirectly by the Feeder Fund as 
a result of the Master Fund's investment in shares of one or more 
companies (A) that are investment companies or (B) that would be 
investment companies under Section 3(a) of the Investment Company Act 
but for the exceptions to that definition provided for in Sections 
3(c)(1) and 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act. For purposes of this 
instruction, a ``Master-Feeder Fund'' means a two-tiered arrangement in 
which one or more investment companies registered under the Investment 
Company Act (each a ``Feeder Fund'') holds shares of a single 
management investment company registered under the Investment Company 
Act (the ``Master Fund'') in accordance with Section 12(d)(1)(E) of the 
Investment Company Act.
    i. The Fund may clarify in a footnote to the fee table that the 
total annual expenses item under Item 3.1 is different from the ratio 
of expenses to average net assets given in response to Item 4.1, which 
reflects the operating expenses of the Fund and does not include 
Acquired Fund fees and expenses.
    Example
    11. For purposes of the Example in the table:
    a. Assume that the rates listed under ``Annual Expenses'' remain 
the same each year, except to reduce annual expenses to reflect the 
scheduled maturity of outstanding debt or the completion of 
organization expense amortization;
    b. assume reinvestment of all dividends and distributions at net 
asset value;
    c. reflect all recurring and nonrecurring fees including 
underwriting discounts and commissions; and
    d. prominently disclose that the Example should not be considered a 
representation of future expenses and that actual expenses may be 
greater or lesser than those shown.
    2. Include a synopsis of information contained in the prospectus 
when the prospectus is long or complex. Normally, a synopsis should not 
be provided where the prospectus is twelve or fewer printed pages.
    Instruction. The synopsis should provide a clear and concise 
description of the key features of the offering and the Fund, with 
cross-references to relevant disclosures elsewhere in the prospectus or 
Statement of Additional Information.
    3. In the case of a business development company, include the 
information required by Item 101(e) of Regulation S-K [17 CFR 
229.101(e)] (concerning reports and other information filed with the 
Commission).

Item 4. Financial Highlights

    1. General. Furnish the following information for the Fund, or for 
the Fund and its subsidiaries, consolidated as prescribed in Rule 6-03 
[17 CFR 210.6-03] of Regulation S-X:

Financial Highlights
Per Share Operating Performance
a. Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
    (1) Net Investment Income
    (2) Net Gains or Losses on Securities (both realized and 
unrealized)
b. Total From Investment Operations
c. Less Distributions
    (1) Dividends (from net investment income)
    (A) To Preferred Shareholders
    (B) To Common Shareholders
    (2) Distributions (from capital gains)
    (A) To Preferred Shareholders
    (B) To Common Shareholders
    (3) Returns of Capital
    (A) To Preferred Shareholders
    (B) To Common Shareholders
d. Total Distributions
e. Net Asset Value, End of Period
f. Per Share Market Value, End of Period
g. Total Investment Return
Ratios/Supplemental Data
h. Net Assets, End of Period
i. Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets
j. Ratio of Net Income to Average Net Assets
k. Portfolio Turnover Rate

    Instructions.
    General Instructions
    1. [Removed and reserved.]
    2. Briefly explain the nature of the information contained in the 
table and its source. The auditor's report as to the financial 
highlights need not be included in the prospectus. Note that the 
auditor's report is contained elsewhere in the registration statement, 
specify its location, and state that it can be obtained by 
shareholders.
    3. Present the information in comparative columns for each of the 
last ten fiscal years of the Fund (or for the life of the Fund and its 
immediate predecessors, if less), but only for periods subsequent to 
the effective date of the Fund's first Securities Act registration 
statement. In addition, present the information for the period between 
the end of the latest fiscal year and the date of the latest balance 
sheet or statement of assets and liabilities. Where the period for 
which the Fund provides financial highlights is less than a full fiscal 
year, the ratios set forth in the table may be annualized but the fact 
of this annualization must be disclosed in a note to the table.
    4. List per share amounts at least to the nearest cent. If the 
offering price is computed in tenths of a cent or more, state the 
amounts on the table in tenths of a cent. Present all information using 
a consistent number of decimal places.
    5. Provide all information in the table, including distributions to 
preferred shareholders, on a common share equivalent basis.
    6. Make, and indicate in a note, appropriate adjustments to reflect 
any stock split or stock dividend during the period.
    7. If the investment adviser has been changed during the period 
covered by this Item, indicate the date(s) of the change(s) in a note.
    8. The financial highlights for at least the latest five fiscal 
years must be audited and must so state.
    Per Share Operating Performance
    9. Derive the amount for caption a(1) by adding (deducting) the 
increase (decrease) per share in undistributed net investment income 
for the period to (from) dividends from net investment income per share 
for the period. The increase (decrease) may be derived by comparing the 
per share figures obtained by dividing undistributed net investment 
income at the beginning and end of the period by the number of shares 
outstanding on those dates. Other methods may be acceptable but should 
be explained briefly in a note to the table.
    10. The amount shown at caption a(2) is the balancing figure 
derived from the other figures in the statement. The amount shown at 
this caption for a share outstanding throughout the year may not agree 
with the change in the aggregate gains and losses in the portfolio 
securities for the year because of the timing of sales and repurchases 
of the Fund's shares in relation to fluctuating market values for the 
portfolio.
    11. For any distributions made from sources other than net 
investment income and capital gains, state the per share amounts 
thereof separately at caption c(3) and note the nature of the 
distributions.
    12. In caption e, use the net asset value for the end of each 
period for which information is being provided. If the Fund has not 
been in operation for a full fiscal year, state its net asset value

[[Page 14531]]

immediately after the closing of its first public offering in a note to 
the caption.
    Total Investment Return
    13. When calculating ``total investment return'' for caption g:
    a. Assume a purchase of common stock at the current market price on 
the first day and a sale at the current market price on the last day of 
each period reported on the table;
    b. note that the total investment return does not reflect sales 
load; and
    c. assume reinvestment of dividends and distributions at prices 
obtained by the Fund's dividend reinvestment plan or, if there is no 
plan, at the lower of the per share net asset value or the closing 
market price of the Fund's shares on the dividend/distribution date.
    14. A Fund also may include, as a separate caption, total return 
based on per share net asset value, provided the Fund briefly explains 
in a note the differences between this calculation and the calculation 
required by caption g.
    Ratios and Supplemental Data
    15. Compute ``average net assets'' for captions i and j based on 
the value of net assets determined no less frequently than the end of 
each month. Indicate in a note that the expense ratio and net 
investment income ratio do not reflect the effect of dividend payments 
to preferred shareholders.
    16. Compute the ``ratio of expenses to average net assets'' using 
the amount of expenses shown in the Fund's statement of operations for 
the relevant fiscal year, including increases resulting from complying 
with paragraph 2(g) of Rule 6-07 of Regulation S-X, and including 
reductions resulting from complying with paragraphs 2(a) and (f) of 
Rule 6-07 regarding fee waivers and reimbursements. If a change in the 
methodology for determining the ratio of expenses to average net assets 
results from applying paragraph 2(g) of Rule 6-07, explain in a note 
that the ratio reflects fees paid with brokerage commissions and fees 
reduced in connection with specific agreements only for fiscal years 
ending after September 1, 1995.
    17. Compute portfolio turnover rate as follows:
    a. Divide (A) the lesser of purchases or sales of portfolio 
securities for the fiscal year by (B) the monthly average of the value 
of portfolio securities owned by the Fund during the fiscal year. 
Calculate the monthly average by totaling the values of portfolio 
securities as of the beginning and end of the first month of the fiscal 
year and as of the end of each of the succeeding eleven months and 
dividing the sum by 13.
    b. Exclude from both the numerator and denominator all securities, 
including options, whose maturity or expiration date at the time of 
acquisition was one year or less. Include all long-term securities, 
including U.S. Government securities. Purchases include cash paid upon 
conversion of one portfolio security into another and the cost of 
rights or warrants. Sales include net proceeds of the sale of rights or 
warrants and net proceeds of portfolio securities that have been called 
or for which payment has been made through redemption or maturity.
    c. If during the fiscal year the Fund acquired the assets of 
another investment company or of a personal holding company in exchange 
for its own shares, exclude from purchases the value of securities so 
acquired, and, from sales, all sales of the securities made following a 
purchase-of-assets transaction to realign the Fund's portfolio. 
Appropriately adjust the denominator of the portfolio turnover 
computation, and disclose the exclusions and adjustments.
    d. Include in purchases and sales short sales that the Fund intends 
to maintain for more than one year and put and call options with 
expiration dates more than one year from the date of acquisition. 
Include proceeds from a short sale in the value of portfolio securities 
sold during the period; include the cost of covering a short sale in 
the value of portfolio securities purchased during the period. Include 
premiums paid to purchase options in the value of portfolio securities 
purchased during the reporting period; include premiums received from 
the sale of options in the value of portfolio securities sold during 
the period.
    2. Business Development Companies. If the Fund is regulated as a 
business development company under the Investment Company Act, furnish 
in a separate section the information required by Items 301, 302, and 
303 of Regulation S-K.
    3. Senior Securities. Furnish the following information as of the 
end of the last ten fiscal years for each class of senior securities 
(including bank loans) of the Fund. If consolidated statements were 
prepared as of any of the dates specified, furnish the information on a 
consolidated basis:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               (1)                        (2)                 (3)                 (4)                 (5)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year............................     Total Amount     Asset Coverage Per      Involuntary       Average Market
                                      Outstanding             Unit            Liquidating        Value Per Unit
                                      Exclusive of                           Preference Per      (Exclude Bank
                                        Treasury                                  Unit               Loans)
                                       Securities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Instructions.
    1. Instructions 2, 3, and 8 to Item 4.1 also apply to this sub-
item.
    2. Use the method described in Section 18(h) of the Investment 
Company Act to calculate the asset coverage to be set forth in column 
(3). However, in lieu of expressing asset coverage in terms of a ratio, 
as described in Section 18(h), express it for each class of senior 
securities in terms of dollar amounts per share (in the case of 
preferred stock) or per $1,000 of indebtedness (in the case of senior 
indebtedness).
    3. Column (4) need be included only with respect to senior stock.
    4. Set forth in a note to the table the method used to determine 
the averages called for by column (5) (e.g., weighted, monthly, daily, 
etc.).
    5. Briefly explain the terms used in the headings of the columns.

Item 5. Plan of Distribution

    Briefly describe how the securities being registered will be 
distributed. Include the following information:
    1. For each principal underwriter distributing the securities being 
offered set forth:
    a. Its name and principal business address;
    b. a brief discussion of the nature of any material relationship 
with the Fund (other than that of principal underwriter), including any 
arrangement under which a principal underwriter or its affiliates will 
perform administrative or custodial services for the Fund;
    Instruction. Any material relationship between the underwriter (or 
its affiliates) and the investment adviser (or its affiliates) of the 
Fund relating to the business or operation of the Fund constitutes a 
material relationship of the underwriter with the Fund.
    c. the amount of securities underwritten; and
    d. the nature of the obligation to distribute the Fund's 
securities.

[[Page 14532]]

    Instruction. All that is required to be disclosed as to the nature 
of the underwriter's obligation is whether the underwriter will be 
committed to take and pay for all the securities if any are taken, or 
whether it is merely an agency or ``best-efforts'' arrangement under 
which the underwriter is required to take and pay for only such 
securities as it may sell to the public. Conditions precedent to the 
underwriter's taking the securities, including ``market outs,'' need 
not be described, except in the case of an agency or ``best-efforts'' 
arrangement.
    2. The price to the public.
    Instructions.
    1. If it is impracticable to state the price to the public, 
concisely explain the manner in which the price will be determined, 
including a description of the valuation procedure used by the Fund in 
determining the price. If the securities are to be offered at the 
market price, or if the offering price is to be determined by a formula 
related to market price, indicate the market involved and the market 
price as of the latest practicable date.
    2. For restrictions on distributions and repurchases of closed-end 
company securities, see Section 23 of the Investment Company Act, and 
Investment Company Act Rel. No. 3187 (Feb. 6, 1961) [26 FR 1275 (Feb. 
15, 1961)].
    3. Briefly explain the basis for any differences in the price at 
which securities are offered to the public, as individuals and/or as 
groups, and to officers, directors and employees of the Fund, its 
adviser or underwriter.
    3. To the extent not set forth on the cover page of the prospectus, 
state the amount of the sales load, if any, as a percentage of the 
public offering price, and concisely describe the commissions to be 
allowed or paid to (i) underwriters, including all other items that 
would be deemed by FINRA to constitute underwriting compensation for 
purposes of FINRA's rules regarding securities offerings, underwriting 
and compensation, and (ii) dealers, including all cash, securities, 
contracts, and/or other considerations to be realized by any dealer in 
connection with the sale of securities.
    Instruction. If any dealers are to act in the capacity of sub-
underwriters and are allowed or paid any additional discounts or 
commission for acting in such capacity, a general statement to that 
effect will suffice without giving the additional amounts to be sold.
    4. If the underwriting agreement provides for indemnification by 
the Fund of the underwriters or their controlling persons against any 
liability arising under the Securities Act or Investment Company Act, 
briefly describe such indemnification provisions.
    5. Provide the identity of any finder and, if applicable, concisely 
describe the nature of any material relationship between such finder 
and the Fund, its officers, directors, principal shareholders, finders 
or promoters or the principal underwriter(s), or the managing 
underwriter(s), if any, and, in each case, the affiliates or associates 
thereof.
    6. Indicate the date by which investors must pay for the 
securities.
    7. If the securities are being offered in conjunction with any 
retirement plan, provide a statement regarding the manner in which 
further information about the plan can be obtained.
    8. If investors' funds will be forwarded to an escrow account, 
identify the escrow agent, and briefly describe the conditions for 
release of the funds, whether such funds will accrue interest while in 
escrow, and the manner in which the monies in such account will be 
distributed if such conditions are not satisfied, including how accrued 
interest, if any, will be distributed to investors.
    9. If the securities offered by the Fund are not being listed on a 
national securities exchange, disclose whether any of the underwriters 
intends to act as a market maker with respect to such unlisted 
securities.
    10. Briefly outline the plan of distribution of any securities that 
are to be offered other than through underwriters.
    a. If the securities are to be offered through the selling efforts 
of brokers or dealers, concisely describe the plan of distribution and 
the terms of any agreement, arrangement, or understanding entered into 
with broker(s) or dealer(s) prior to the effective date of the 
registration statement, including volume limitations on sales, parties 
to the agreement, and the conditions under which the agreement may be 
terminated. If known, identify the broker(s) or dealer(s) that will 
participate in the offering, and state the amount to be offered through 
each.
    b. If any of the securities being registered are to be offered 
other than for cash, describe briefly the general purposes of the 
distribution, the basis upon which the securities are to be offered, 
the amount of compensation and other expenses of distribution, and the 
person(s) responsible for such expenses.
    c. If the distribution is to be made under a plan of acquisition, 
reorganization, readjustment, or succession, provide a statement 
regarding the general effect of the plan and when it becomes operative. 
As to any material amount of assets to be acquired under the plan, 
furnish the information required by Instruction 4 to Item 7.1 below.

Item 6. Selling Shareholders

    If any securities being registered are to be offered for the 
account of shareholders, furnish the information required by Item 507 
of Regulation S-K [17 CFR 229.507].

Item 7. Use of Proceeds

    1. State the principal purposes for which the net proceeds of the 
offering are intended to be used and the approximate amount intended to 
be used for each purpose.
    Instructions.
    1. If any substantial portion of the proceeds will not be allocated 
in accordance with the investment objectives and policies of the Fund, 
a statement to that effect should be made together with a statement of 
the amount involved and an indication of how that amount will be 
invested.
    2. If a material part of the proceeds will be used to discharge 
indebtedness, state the interest rate and maturity of the indebtedness.
    3. If the Fund intends to incur loans to pay underwriting 
commissions or any other organizational or offering expenses, disclose 
this fact and state the name of the lender, the amount of the first 
installment, the rate of interest, the date on which payments will 
begin, the dates and amounts of subsequent installments, and the final 
maturity date. Explain that the interest paid on such borrowing will 
not be available for investment purposes and will increase the expenses 
of the fund.
    4. If any material part of the proceeds will be used to acquire 
assets other than in the ordinary course of business, briefly describe 
the assets, the names of the persons from whom they are to be acquired, 
the cost of the assets to the Fund, and how the costs were determined.
    2. Disclose how long it is expected to take to fully invest net 
proceeds in accordance with the Fund's investment objectives and 
policies, the reasons for any anticipated lengthy delay in investing 
the net proceeds, and the consequences of any delay.

Item 8. General Description of the Registrant

    Concisely discuss the organization and operation, or proposed 
operation, of the Fund. Include the information specified below.

[[Page 14533]]

    1. General. Briefly describe the Fund, including:
    a. The date and form of organization and the name of the state or 
other jurisdiction under whose laws it is organized; and
    b. the classification and subclassification under Sections 4 and 5 
of the Investment Company Act.
    2. Investment Objectives and Policies. Concisely describe the 
investment objectives and policies of the Fund that will constitute its 
principal portfolio emphasis, including the following:
    a. If these objectives may be changed without a vote of the holders 
of a majority of voting securities, a brief statement to that effect;
    b. how the Fund proposes to achieve its objectives, including:
    (1) The types of securities in which the Fund invests or will 
invest principally;
    (2) the identity of any particular industry or group of industries 
in which the Fund proposes to concentrate.
    Instruction. Concentration, for purposes of this Item, is deemed 25 
percent or more of the value of the Fund's total assets invested or 
proposed to be invested in a particular industry or group of 
industries. The policy on concentration should not be inconsistent with 
the Fund's name.
    c. identify other policies of the Fund that may not be changed 
without the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities, 
including those policies that the Fund deems to be fundamental within 
the meaning of Section 8(b) of the Investment Company Act; and
    d. briefly describe the significant investment practices or 
techniques that the Fund employs or intends to employ (such as risk 
arbitrage, reverse repurchase agreements, forward delivery contracts, 
when-issued securities, stand-by commitments, options and futures 
contracts, options on futures contracts, currency transactions, foreign 
securities, investing for control of management, and/or lending of 
portfolio securities) that are not described pursuant to subparagraph 
2.c above or subparagraph 3 below.
    3. Risk Factors. Concisely describe the risks associated with an 
investment in the Fund, including the following:
    a. General. Discuss the principal risk factors associated with 
investment in the Fund specifically as well as those factors generally 
associated with investment in a company with investment objectives, 
investment policies, capital structure, or trading markets similar to 
the Fund's.
    b. Effects of Leverage. If the prospectus offers common stock of 
the Fund and the Fund has outstanding or is offering a class of senior 
securities as defined in Section 18 of the Investment Company Act, 
then:
    (1) Set forth the annual rate of interest or dividend payments on 
the senior securities;
    Instruction. If payments will vary because the interest or dividend 
rate is variable, provide the initial rate or, if the security is 
currently outstanding, the current rate.
    (2) set forth the annual return that the Fund's portfolio must 
experience in order to cover annual interest or dividend payments on 
senior securities; and
    (3) provide a table illustrating the effect on return to a common 
stockholder of leverage (using senior securities) in the format 
illustrated below, using the captions provided, and assuming annual 
returns on the Fund's portfolio (net of expenses) of minus ten, minus 
five, zero, five, and ten percent.
    (4) The table should be accompanied by a brief narrative explaining 
that the purpose of the table is to assist the investor in 
understanding the effects of leverage. Indicate that the figures 
appearing in the table are hypothetical and that actual returns may be 
greater or less than those appearing in the table.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assumed Return on Portfolio (Net of Expenses)..         -10%          -5%           0%          -5%          10%
Corresponding Return to Common Stockholder.....            %            %            %            %            %
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Instructions.
    1. Round all percentages to the nearest hundredth of one percent.
    2. A Fund may assume additional rates of return on its portfolio; 
however, to the extent a Fund shows an additional positive rate of 
return, it must also show an additional negative rate of return of the 
same magnitude. A Fund may show the positive rate of return at which 
the corresponding rate of return to the common stockholder is zero 
without showing the corresponding negative rate of return.
    3. Compute the ``corresponding return to common stockholder'' as 
follows: Multiply the total amount of fund assets at the beginning of 
the period by the assumed rate of return; subtract from the resulting 
product all interest accrued or dividends declared on senior securities 
that would be made during the year following the offering; and divide 
the resulting difference by the total amount of fund assets 
attributable to common stock. If payments will vary because the 
interest or dividend rate is variable, use the initial rate or, if the 
security is currently outstanding, the current rate.
    4. Other Policies. Briefly discuss the types of investments that 
will be made by the Fund, other than those that will constitute its 
principal portfolio emphasis (as discussed in Item 8.2 above), and any 
policies or practices relating to those investments.
    Instructions.
    1. This discussion should receive less emphasis in the prospectus 
than that required by Item 8.2 and, if appropriate in light of 
Instructions 2 and 3 below, may be omitted or limited to the 
information necessary to identify the type of investment, policy, or 
practice.
    2. Do not discuss a policy that prohibits a particular practice or 
permits a practice that the Fund has not used within the past twelve 
months (or since its initial public offering, if that period is 
shorter) and does not intend to use in the future.
    3. If a policy limits a particular practice so that no more than 
five percent of the Fund's net assets are at risk, or if the Fund has 
not followed that practice within the last year (or since its initial 
public offering, if such period is shorter) in such a manner that more 
than five percent of net assets were at risk and does not intend to 
follow such practice so as to put more than five percent of net assets 
at risk, limit the prospectus disclosure about such practice to that 
necessary to identify the practice. Disclose whether or not the Fund 
will provide prior notice to security holders of its intention to 
commence or expand the use of such practice.
    The amount of the Fund's net assets that are at risk for purposes 
of determining whether ``more than five percent of net assets are at 
risk'' is not limited to the initial amount of the Fund's assets that 
are invested in a particular practice, e.g., the purchase price of an 
option. The amount of net assets at risk is determined by reference to 
the potential liability or loss that may be incurred by the Fund in 
connection with a particular practice.
    5. Share Price Data. If the prospectus offers common stock or other 
type of

[[Page 14534]]

common equity security (collectively ``common stock'') and if the 
Fund's common stock is publicly held, provide the following 
information:
    a. Identify the principal United States market or markets in which 
the common stock is being traded. Where there is no established public 
trading market, furnish a statement to that effect.
    Instruction. The existence of limited or sporadic quotations should 
not itself be deemed to constitute an ``established public trading 
market.''
    b. If the principal United States market for the common stock is an 
exchange, state the high and low sales prices for the stock for each 
full quarterly period within the two most recent fiscal years and each 
full fiscal quarter since the beginning of the current fiscal year, as 
reported in the consolidated transaction reporting system or, if not so 
reported, as reported on the principal exchange market for the stock. 
If the principal United States market for the common stock is not an 
exchange, state the range of high and low bid information for the 
common stock for the periods described in the preceding sentence, as 
regularly quoted in the automated quotation system of a registered 
securities association or, if not so quoted, the range of reported high 
and low bid quotations, indicating the source of the quotations.
    Instructions.
    1. This information should be set forth in tabular form.
    2. Indicate, as applicable, that such over-the-counter market 
quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-
down, or commission and may not necessarily represent actual 
transactions.
    3. Where there is an absence of an established public trading 
market, qualify reference to quotations by an appropriate explanation.
    4. With respect to each quotation, disclose the net asset value and 
the discount or premium to net asset value (expressed as a percentage) 
represented by the quotation.
    5. Where the shares of the Fund trade at their high or low share 
price for more than one day during the period, the Fund should provide 
the discount or premium information for the day on which the premium or 
discount was greatest.
    c. Include share price and corresponding net asset value and 
premium/discount information as of the latest practicable date.
    d. Disclose whether the Fund's common stock has historically traded 
for an amount less than, equal to, or exceeding net asset value. 
Disclose any methods undertaken or to be undertaken by the Fund that 
are intended to reduce any discount (such as the repurchase of fund 
shares, providing for the ability to convert to an open-end investment 
company, guaranteed distribution plans, etc.), and briefly discuss the 
effects that these measures have or may have on the Fund.
    e. If the shares of the Fund have no history of public trading, 
discuss the tendency of closed-end fund shares to trade frequently at a 
discount from net asset value and the risk of loss this creates for 
investors purchasing shares in the initial public offering. If the Fund 
has omitted the statement required by Item 1.i, describe the basis for 
the Fund's belief that its shares will not trade at a discount from net 
asset value.
    6. Business Development Companies. A Fund that is a business 
development company should, in addition, provide the following 
information:
    a. Portfolio Companies. For each portfolio company in which the 
Fund is investing, disclose: (1) The name and address; (2) nature of 
business; (3) title, class, percentage of class, and value of portfolio 
company securities held by the Fund; (4) amount and general terms of 
all loans to portfolio companies; and (5) the relationship of the 
portfolio companies to the Fund.
    Instructions.
    1. The description of the nature of the business of a portfolio 
company in which the Fund is investing may vary according to the extent 
of the Fund's investment in the particular portfolio company. The Fund 
need only briefly identify the nature of the business of a portfolio 
company in which the Fund's investment constitutes less than five 
percent of the Fund's assets.
    2. In describing the nature of the business of a portfolio company, 
include matters such as the competitive conditions of the business of 
the company; its market share; dependence on a single or small number 
of customers; importance to it of any patents, trademarks, licenses, 
franchises, or concessions held; key operating personnel; and 
particular vulnerability to changes in government regulation, interest 
rates, or technology.
    3. In describing the relationship of portfolio companies to the 
Fund, include a discussion of the extent to which the Fund makes 
available significant managerial assistance to its portfolio companies. 
Disclose any other material business, professional, or family 
relationship between the officers and directors of the Fund and any 
portfolio company, its officers, directors, and affiliates (as defined 
in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act).
    b. Certain Subsidiaries. If the Fund has a wholly-owned small 
business investment company subsidiary, disclose: (1) Whether the 
subsidiary is regulated as a business development company or investment 
company under the Investment Company Act; (2) the percentage of the 
Fund's assets invested in the subsidiary; and (3) material information 
about the small business investment company's operations, including the 
special risks of investing in a portfolio heavily invested in 
securities of small and developing or financially troubled businesses.
    c. Financial Statements. Unless the business development company 
has had less than one fiscal year of operations, provide the financial 
statements of the Fund.
    Instructions.
    1. a. Furnish, in a separate section following the responses to the 
above items in Part A of the registration statement, the financial 
statements and schedules required by Regulation S-X [17 CFR part 210]. 
A business development company should comply with the provisions of 
Regulation S-X generally applicable to registered management investment 
companies. (See Section 210.3-18 and Sections 210.6-01 through 210.6-10 
of Regulation S-X.)
    b. A business development company should provide an indication in 
its Schedule of Investments of those investments that are not 
qualifying investments under Section 55(a) of the Investment Company 
Act and, in a footnote, briefly explain the significance of non-
qualification.
    2. Notwithstanding the requirements of Instruction 1 above, the 
following statements and schedules required by Regulation S-X may be 
omitted from Part A and included in Part C of the Registration 
statement:
    a. The statement of any subsidiary that is not a majority-owned 
subsidiary; and
    b. columns C and D of Schedule IV [17 CFR 210.12-03] in support of 
the most recent balance sheet.
    3. A business development company with less than one fiscal year of 
operations should provide its financial statements in the Statement of 
Additional Information in response to Item 24.
    d. Prior Operations. If the Fund has had an operating history prior 
to electing to be regulated as a business development company, disclose 
any anticipated changes in its operations as a result of coming into 
compliance with Section 55(a) of the Investment Company Act. This 
information may be omitted in a prospectus used a sufficient

[[Page 14535]]

time after election to be regulated as a business development company 
so that it is no longer material.
    e. Special Risk Factors. To the extent not disclosed in response to 
this Item or Item 8.3, concisely describe the special risks of 
investing in a business development company, including the risks 
associated with investing in a portfolio of small and developing or 
financially troubled businesses. (See Section 64(b)(1) of the 
Investment Company Act.)

Item 9. Management

    1. General. Describe concisely how the business of the Fund is 
managed, including:
    a. Board of Directors. A description of the responsibilities of the 
board of directors with respect to the management of the Fund;
    Instructions.
    1. In responding to this Item, it is sufficient to include a 
general statement as to the responsibilities of the board of directors 
under the applicable laws of the Fund's jurisdiction of organization.
    2. A Fund that has elected to be regulated as a business 
development company should briefly describe the terms of any special 
compensation plans available to management.
    b. Investment Advisers. For each investment adviser of the Fund:
    (1) Its name and principal business address, a description of its 
experience as an investment adviser, and, if the investment adviser is 
controlled by another person, the name of that person and the general 
nature of its business;
    Instruction. If the investment adviser is subject to more than one 
level of control, it is sufficient to provide the name of the ultimate 
control person.
    (2) a description of the services provided by the investment 
adviser;
    Instructions.
    1. If, in addition to providing investment advice, the investment 
adviser or persons employed by or associated with the investment 
adviser are subject to the authority of the board of directors, 
responsible for overall management of the Fund's business affairs, it 
is sufficient to state that fact instead of listing all services 
provided.
    2. A Fund that has elected to be regulated as a business 
development company should describe briefly the type of managerial 
assistance that is or will be provided to the businesses in which it is 
investing and the qualifications of the investment adviser to render 
such management assistance.
    (3) a description of its compensation; and
    Instructions.
    1. State generally what the adviser's fee is or will be as a 
percentage of average net assets, including any break-point. It is not 
necessary to include precise details as to how the fee is computed or 
paid.
    2. If the investment advisory fee is paid in some manner other than 
on the basis of average net assets, briefly describe the basis of 
payment.
    (4) a statement, adjacent to the disclosure required by paragraph 
1.b(3) of this Item, that a discussion regarding the basis for the 
board of directors approving any investment advisory contract of the 
Fund is available in the Fund's annual or semi-annual report to 
shareholders, as applicable, and providing the period covered by the 
relevant annual or semi-annual report.
    c. Portfolio Management. The name, title, and length of service of 
the person or persons employed by or associated with the Fund or an 
investment adviser of the Fund who are primarily responsible for the 
day-to-day management of the Fund's portfolio (``Portfolio Manager''). 
Also state each Portfolio Manager's business experience during the past 
5 years. Include a statement, adjacent to the foregoing disclosure, 
that the SAI provides additional information about the Portfolio 
Manager's(s') compensation, other accounts managed by the Portfolio 
Manager(s), and the Portfolio Manager's(s') ownership of securities in 
the Fund.
    Instruction. If a committee, team, or other group of persons 
associated with the Fund or an investment adviser of the Fund is 
jointly and primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the 
Fund's portfolio, information in response to this Item is required for 
each member of such committee, team, or other group. For each such 
member, provide a brief description of the person's role on the 
committee, team, or other group (e.g., lead member), including a 
description of any limitations on the person's role and the 
relationship between the person's role and the roles of other persons 
who have responsibility for the day-to-day management of the Fund's 
portfolio. If more than five persons are jointly and primarily 
responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund's portfolio, the 
Fund need only provide information for the five persons with the most 
significant responsibility for the day-to-day management of the Fund's 
portfolio.
    d. Administrators. The identity of any other person who provides 
significant administrative or business affairs management services 
(e.g., an ``Administrator'' or ``Sub-Administrator''), a description of 
the services provided, and the compensation to be paid;
    e. Custodians. The name and principal business address of the 
custodian(s), transfer agent, and dividend paying agent;
    f. Expenses. The type of expenses for which the Fund is 
responsible, and, if organization expenses of the Fund are to be paid 
out of its assets, how the expenses will be amortized and the period 
over which the amortization will occur; and
    g. Affiliated Brokerage. If the Fund pays (or will pay) brokerage 
commissions to any broker that is an (1) affiliated person of the Fund, 
(2) affiliated person of such person, or (3) affiliated person of an 
affiliated person of the Fund, its investment adviser, or its principal 
underwriter, a statement to that effect.
    2. Non-resident Managers. If any non-resident officer, director, 
underwriter, investment adviser, or expert named in the registration 
statement has a substantial portion of its assets located outside the 
United States, identify each person, and state how the enforcement by 
investors of civil liabilities under the federal securities laws may be 
affected. This disclosure should indicate whether:
    a. Investors will be able to effect service of process within the 
United States upon these persons;
    b. investors will be able to enforce, in United States courts, 
judgments against these persons obtained in such courts predicated upon 
the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws;
    c. the appropriate foreign courts would enforce judgments of United 
States courts obtained in actions against these persons predicated upon 
the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws; and
    d. the appropriate foreign courts would enforce, in original 
actions, liabilities against these persons predicated solely upon the 
federal securities laws.
    Instruction. If any portions of this disclosure are stated to be 
based upon an opinion of counsel, name the counsel in the prospectus, 
and include an appropriate manually signed consent to the use of 
counsel's name and opinion as an exhibit to the registration statement.
    3. Control Persons. Identify each person who, as of a specified 
date no more than 30 days prior to the date of filing the registration 
statement (or amendment to it), controls the Fund.
    Instruction. For the purposes of this Item, ``control'' means (1) 
the beneficial ownership, either directly or through one or more 
controlled companies, of

[[Page 14536]]

more than 25 percent of the voting securities of a company; (2) the 
acknowledgment or assertion by either the controlled or controlling 
party of the existence of control; or (3) an adjudication under Section 
2(a)(9) of the Investment Company Act, which has become final, that 
control exists.

Item 10. Capital Stock, Long-Term Debt, and Other Securities

    1. Capital Stock. For each class of capital stock of the Fund, 
state the title of the class and briefly describe all of the matters 
listed in paragraphs 1.a through 1.f that are relevant:
    a. Concisely discuss the nature and most significant attributes, 
including, where applicable, (1) dividend rights, policies, or 
limitations; (2) voting rights; (3) liquidation rights; (4) liability 
to further calls or to assessments by the Fund; (5) preemptive rights, 
conversion rights, redemption provisions, and sinking fund provisions; 
and (6) any material obligations or potential liability associated with 
ownership of the security (not including investment risks);
    Instructions.
    1. A complete legal description of the securities should not be 
given.
    2. If the Fund has a policy of making distribution or dividend 
payments at predetermined times and minimum rates, disclosure should 
include a statement that, if the fund's investments do not generate 
sufficient income, the fund may be required to liquidate a portion of 
its portfolio to fund these distributions, and therefore these payments 
may represent a reduction of the shareholders' principal investment. 
The tax consequences of such payments also should be described briefly.
    b. with respect to preferred stock, (1) state whether there are any 
restrictions on the Fund while there is an arrearage in the payment of 
dividends or sinking fund installments, and, if so, concisely describe 
the restrictions and (2) briefly describe provisions restricting the 
declaration of dividends, requiring the maintenance of any ratio or 
assets, requiring the creation or maintenance of reserves, or 
permitting or restricting the issuance of additional securities;
    c. if the rights of holders of the security may be modified other 
than by a vote of a majority or more of the shares outstanding, voting 
as a class, so state, and briefly explain;
    d. if rights evidenced by, or the amounts payable with respect to, 
any class of securities being described are, or may be, materially 
limited or qualified by the rights of any other authorized class of 
securities, include sufficient information regarding the other 
securities to enable investors to understand such rights and 
limitations;
    e. if the Fund has a dividend reinvestment plan, briefly discuss 
the material aspects of the plan including, but not limited to, whether 
the plan is automatic or whether shareholders must affirmatively elect 
to participate; (2) the method by which shareholders can elect to 
reinvest stock dividends or, if the plan is automatic, to receive cash 
dividends; (3) from whom additional information about the plan may be 
obtained (including a telephone number or address); (4) the method of 
determining the number of shares that will be distributed in lieu of a 
cash dividend; (5) the income tax consequences of participation in the 
plan (i.e., that capital gains and income are realized, although cash 
is not received by the shareholder); (6) how to terminate participation 
in the plan and rights upon termination; (7) if applicable, that an 
investor holding shares that participate in the dividend reinvestment 
plan in a brokerage account may not be able to transfer the shares to 
another broker and continue to participate in the dividend reinvestment 
plan; (8) the type and amount (if known) of fees, commissions, and 
expenses payable by participants in connection with the plan; and (9) 
if a cash purchase plan option is available, any minimum or maximum 
investment required; and
    f. briefly describe any provision of the Fund's charter or bylaws 
that would have an effect of delaying, deferring, or preventing a 
change of control of the Fund and that would operate only with respect 
to an extraordinary corporate transaction involving the Fund, such as a 
merger, reorganization, tender offer, sale or transfer of substantially 
all of its assets, or liquidation.
    Instruction. Provisions and arrangements required by law or imposed 
by governmental or judicial authority need not be discussed. Provisions 
or arrangements adopted by the Fund to effect or further compliance 
with laws or governmental or judicial mandate must be described where 
compliance does not require the specific provisions or arrangements 
adopted.
    2. Long-Term Debt. If the Fund is issuing or has outstanding a 
class of long-term debt, state the title of the debt securities and 
their principal amount, and concisely describe any of the matters 
listed in paragraphs 2.a through 2.e that are relevant:
    a. Provisions concerning maturity, interest, conversion, 
redemption, amortization, sinking fund, and/or retirement;
    b. provisions restricting the declaration of dividends, requiring 
the maintenance of any ratio or assets, and/or requiring the creation 
or maintenance of reserves;
    c. provisions permitting or restricting the issuance of additional 
securities, the ability to incur additional debt, the release or 
substitution of assets securing the issue, and/or the modification of 
the terms of the securities;
    Instruction. A complete legal description of the securities should 
not be given.
    d. for each trustee, its name, the nature of any material 
relationship it has with the Fund or any of its affiliates, the 
percentage of securities necessary to require the trustee to take 
action, and any indemnification the trustee may require before 
proceeding against assets of the Fund; and
    e. to the extent not otherwise disclosed in response to this Item, 
whether the rights evidenced by the long-term debt are, or may be, 
materially limited or qualified by the rights of any other authorized 
class of securities, and, if so, include sufficient information 
regarding such other securities to enable investors to understand such 
rights and limitations.
    3. General. Concisely describe the significant attributes of each 
other class of the Fund's authorized securities. The description should 
be comparable to that called for by paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Item. If 
the securities are subscription warrants or rights, state the title and 
amount of securities called for and the period during which, and the 
prices at which, the warrants or rights are exercised.
    4. Taxes. Concisely describe the tax consequences to investors of 
an investment in the securities being offered. If the Fund intends to 
qualify for treatment under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 [26 U.S.C. 851-856], it is sufficient, in the absence of 
special circumstances, to state that: (i) The Fund will distribute all 
of its net investment income and gains to shareholders and that these 
distributions are taxable as ordinary income or capital gains; (ii) 
shareholders may be proportionately liable for taxes on income and 
gains of the Fund but shareholders not subject to tax on their income 
will not be required to pay tax on amounts distributed on them; and 
(iii) the Fund will inform shareholders of the amount and nature of the 
income or gains.
    Instructions.
    1. The description should not include detailed discussions of 
applicable law.
    2. The Fund should specifically address whether shareholders will 
be subject to the alternative minimum tax.

[[Page 14537]]

    5. Outstanding Securities. Furnish the following information, in 
substantially the tabular form indicated, for each class of authorized 
securities of the Fund. The information must be current within 90 days 
of the filing of this registration statement or amendment to it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (1)                             (2)                      (3)                      (4)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Title of Class                Amount Authorized          Amount Held by         Amount Outstanding
                                                                  Registrant or for its     Exclusive of Amount
                                                                         Account              Shown Under (3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    6. Securities Ratings. If the prospectus relates to senior 
securities of the Fund that have been assigned a rating by a nationally 
recognized securities rating organization and the rating is disclosed 
in the prospectus, briefly discuss the significance of the rating, the 
basis upon which ratings are issued, any conditions or guidelines 
imposed by the NRSRO for the Fund to maintain the rating, and whether 
or not the Fund intends, or has any contractual obligation, to comply 
with these conditions or guidelines. In addition, disclose the material 
terms of any agreement between the Fund or any of its affiliates and 
the NRSRO under which the NRSRO provides such rating. If the prospectus 
relates to securities other than senior securities of the Fund that 
have been assigned a rating by a NRSRO, the information required by 
this paragraph may be provided in the Statement of Additional 
Information unless the rating criteria will materially affect the 
investment policies of the Fund (e.g., if the rating agency establishes 
criteria for selection of the Fund's portfolio securities with which 
the Fund intends to comply), in which case it should be included in the 
prospectus.
    Instructions.
    1. The term ``nationally recognized securities rating 
organization'' has the same meaning as used in Rule 15c3-1(c)(2)(vi)(F) 
under the Exchange Act.
    2. Rule 436(g)(1) of Regulation C under the Securities Act [17 CFR 
230.436(g)(1)] provides that a security rating assigned by an NRSRO to 
a class of debt securities, a class of convertible debt securities, or 
a class of preferred stock is not considered a part of the registration 
statement for purposes of Sections 7 and 11 of the Securities Act. 
Therefore, in the case of disclosure of a rating assigned to these 
types of securities issued by the Fund, the Fund need not include a 
written consent of the NRSRO as an exhibit to the registration 
statement as required by Item 25.2.n but must provide the disclosure 
called for by this Item.
    3. Reference should be made to the statement of the Commission's 
policy on security ratings set forth under the section ``General'' in 
Regulation S-K [17 CFR 229.10] for the Commission's views on other 
important matters to be considered in disclosing securities ratings.

Item 11. Defaults and Arrears on Senior Securities

    1. State the nature, date, and amount of default of payment of 
principal, interest, or amortization for each issue of long-term debt 
of the Fund that is in default on the date of filing.
    2. If an issue of capital stock has any accumulated dividend in 
arrears at the date of filing, state the title of each issue and the 
amount per share in arrears.

Item 12. Legal Proceedings

    Describe briefly any material pending legal proceedings, other than 
ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business, to which the 
Fund, any subsidiary of the Fund, or the Fund's investment adviser or 
principal underwriter is a party. Include the name of the court where 
the case is pending, the date instituted, the principal parties, a 
description of the factual basis alleged to underlie the proceeding, 
and the relief sought. Include similar information as to any proceeding 
instituted by a governmental authority or known to be contemplated by a 
governmental authority.
    Instruction. Legal Proceedings, for purposes of this Item, are 
material only to the extent that they are likely to have a material 
adverse effect upon: (1) The ability of the investment adviser or 
principal underwriter to perform its contract with the Fund; or (2) the 
Fund.

Item 13. [Removed and Reserved]

Part B--Information Required in a Statement of Additional Information

Item 14. Cover Page

    1. The outside cover page must contain the following information:
    a. The Fund's name;
    b. a statement or statements (1) that the Statement of Additional 
Information is not a prospectus, (2) that the Statement of Additional 
Information should be read with the prospectus, and (3) how a copy of 
the prospectus may be obtained;
    c. the date of the Statement of Additional Information;
    d. the date of the related prospectus and any other identifying 
information that the Fund deems appropriate; and
    e. the statement required by paragraph (b)(2) of Rule 481 under the 
Securities Act.
    2. The cover page may include other information, provided that it 
does not, by its nature, quantity, or manner of presentation, impede 
understanding of required information.

Item 15. Table of Contents

    List the contents of the Statement of Additional Information, and, 
where useful, provide a cross-reference to related disclosure in the 
prospectus.

Item 16. General Information and History

    If the Fund has engaged in a business other than that of an 
investment company during the past five years, state the nature of the 
other business and give the approximate date on which the Fund 
commenced business as an investment company. If the Fund's name was 
changed during that period, state its former name and the approximate 
date on which it was changed. If the change in the Fund's business or 
name occurred in connection with any bankruptcy, receivership, or 
similar proceeding or any other material reorganization, readjustment, 
or succession, briefly describe the nature and results of the same.

Item 17. Investment Objective and Policies

    1. Describe clearly and concisely the investment policies of the 
Fund. It is not necessary to repeat information contained in the 
prospectus, but, in augmenting the disclosure about those types of 
investments, policies, or practices that are briefly discussed or 
identified in the prospectus, the Fund should refer to the prospectus 
when necessary to clarify the additional information called for by this 
Item.
    2. Concisely describe any fundamental policy of the Fund not 
described in the prospectus with respect to each of the following 
activities:
    a. The issuance of senior securities;
    b. short sales, purchases on margin, and the writing of put and 
call options;

[[Page 14538]]

    c. the borrowing of money (describe briefly any fundamental policy 
that limits the Fund's ability to borrow money, and state the purpose 
for which the proceeds will be used);
    d. the underwriting of securities of other issuers (include any 
fundamental policy concerning the acquisition of restricted securities, 
i.e., securities that must be registered under the Securities Act 
before they may be offered or sold to the public);
    e. the concentration of investments in a particular industry or 
groups of industries;
    f. the purchase or sale of real estate and real estate mortgage 
loans;
    g. the purchase or sale of commodities or commodity contracts, 
including futures contracts;
    h. the making of loans (for purposes of this item, the term 
``loans'' does not include the purchase of a portion of an issue of 
publicly distributed bonds, debentures, or other securities, whether or 
not the purchase was made upon the original issuance of the securities; 
however, the term ``loan'' includes the loaning of cash or portfolio 
securities to any person); and
    i. any other policy that the Fund deems fundamental.
    Instructions.
    1. For purposes of this Item, the term ``fundamental policy'' is 
defined as any policy that the Fund has deemed to be fundamental or 
that may not be changed without the approval of a majority of the 
Fund's outstanding voting securities.
    2. If the Fund reserves freedom of action with respect to any of 
the foregoing activities (other than the activity described in 
paragraph e), it must disclose the maximum percentage of assets to be 
devoted to the particular activity.
    3. Describe fully any significant investment policies of the Fund 
not described in the prospectus that are not deemed fundamental and 
that may be changed without the approval of the holders of a majority 
of the voting securities (e.g., investing for control of management, 
investing in foreign securities, or arbitrage activities).
    Instruction. The Fund should disclose the extent to which it may 
engage in the above policies and the risks inherent in such policies.
    4. Briefly explain any significant change in the Fund's portfolio 
turnover rates over the last two fiscal years. If the Fund anticipates 
a significant change in the portfolio turnover rate from that reported 
under caption k of Item 4.1 for its most recent fiscal year, so state. 
In the case of a new registration, the Fund should state its policy 
with respect to portfolio turnover.

Item 18. Management

    General Instructions.
    1. For purposes of this Item 18, the terms below have the following 
meanings:
    a. The term ``family of investment companies'' means any two or 
more registered investment companies that:
    (1) Share the same investment adviser or principal underwriter; and
    (2) Hold themselves out to investors as related companies for 
purposes of investment and investor services.
    b. The term ``fund complex'' means two or more registered 
investment companies that:
    (1) Hold themselves out to investors as related companies for 
purposes of investment and investor services; or
    (2) Have a common investment adviser or have an investment adviser 
that is an affiliated person of the investment adviser of any of the 
other registered investment companies.
    c. The term ``immediate family member'' means a person's spouse; 
child residing in the person's household (including step and adoptive 
children); and any dependent of the person, as defined in Section 152 
of the Internal Revenue Code [26 U.S.C. 152].
    d. The term ``officer'' means the president, vice-president, 
secretary, treasurer, controller, or any other officer who performs 
policy-making functions.
    2. When providing information about directors, furnish information 
for directors who are interested persons of the Fund, as defined in 
Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act and the rules 
thereunder, separately from the information for directors who are not 
interested persons of the Fund. For example, when furnishing 
information in a table, you should provide separate tables (or separate 
sections of a single table) for directors who are interested persons 
and for directors who are not interested persons. When furnishing 
information in narrative form, indicate by heading or otherwise the 
directors who are interested persons and the directors who are not 
interested persons.
    1. Provide the information required by the following table for each 
director and officer of the Fund, and, if the Fund has an advisory 
board, member of the board. Explain in a footnote to the table any 
family relationship between the persons listed.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                (1)                            (2)                     (3)                    (4)                    (5)                    (6)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Name, Address, and Age         Position(s) Held with    Term of Office and          Principal         Number of Portfolios   Other Directorships
                                            Registrant        Length of Time Served   Occupation(s) During      in Fund Complex       Held by Director
                                                                                          Past 5 Years       Overseen by Director
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Instructions.
    1. For purposes of this paragraph, the term ``family relationship'' 
means any relationship by blood, marriage, or adoption, not more remote 
than first cousin.
    2. For each director who is an interested person of the Fund, as 
defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act and the rules 
thereunder, describe, in a footnote or otherwise, the relationship, 
events, or transactions by reason of which the director is an 
interested person.
    3. State the principal business of any company listed under column 
(4) unless the principal business is implicit in its name.
    4. Indicate in column (6) directorships not included in column (5) 
that are held by a director in any company with a class of securities 
registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act or subject to the 
requirements of Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act or any company 
registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, 
and name the companies in which the directorships are held. Where the 
other directorships include directorships overseeing two or more 
portfolios in the same fund complex, identify the fund complex and 
provide the number of portfolios overseen as a director in the fund 
complex rather than listing each portfolio separately.
    2. For each individual listed in column (1) of the table required 
by paragraph 1 of this Item 18, except for any director who is not an 
interested person of the Fund, as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 
Investment Company Act and the rules thereunder, describe any 
positions, including as an officer, employee, director, or general 
partner, held with affiliated persons or principal underwriters of the 
Fund.

[[Page 14539]]

    Instruction. When an individual holds the same position(s) with two 
or more registered investment companies that are part of the same fund 
complex, identify the fund complex and provide the number of registered 
investment companies for which the position(s) are held rather than 
listing each registered investment company separately.
    3. Describe briefly any arrangement or understanding between any 
director or officer and any other person(s) (naming the person(s)) 
pursuant to which he was selected as a director or officer.
    Instruction. Do not include arrangements or understandings with 
directors or officers acting solely in their capacities as such.
    4. For each non-resident director or officer of the Fund listed in 
column (1) of the table required by paragraph 1, disclose whether he 
has authorized an agent in the United States to receive notice and, if 
so, disclose the name and address of the agent.
    5. a. Briefly describe the leadership structure of the Fund's 
board, including whether the chairman of the board is an interested 
person of the Fund, as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment 
Company Act. If the chairman of the board is an interested person of 
the Fund, disclose whether the Fund has a lead independent director and 
what specific role the lead independent director plays in the 
leadership of the Fund. This disclosure should indicate why the Fund 
has determined that its leadership structure is appropriate given the 
specific characteristics or circumstances of the Fund. In addition, 
disclose the extent of the board's role in the risk oversight of the 
Fund, such as how the board administers its oversight function, and the 
effect that this has on the board's leadership structure.
    b. Identify the standing committees of the Fund's board of 
directors, and provide the following information about each committee:
    (1) A concise statement of the functions of the committee;
    (2) The members of the committee;
    (3) The number of committee meetings held during the last fiscal 
year; and
    (4) If the committee is a nominating or similar committee, state 
whether the committee will consider nominees recommended by security 
holders and, if so, describe the procedures to be followed by security 
holders in submitting recommendations.
    6. a. Unless disclosed in the table required by paragraph 1 of this 
Item 18, describe any positions, including as an officer, employee, 
director, or general partner, held by any director who is not an 
interested person of the Fund, as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 
Investment Company Act and the rules thereunder, or immediate family 
member of the director, during the two most recently completed calendar 
years with:
    (1) The Fund;
    (2) An investment company, or a person that would be an investment 
company but for the exclusions provided by Sections 3(c)(1) and 3(c)(7) 
of the Investment Company Act, having the same investment adviser or 
principal underwriter as the Fund or having an investment adviser or 
principal underwriter that directly or indirectly controls, is 
controlled by, or is under common control with an investment adviser or 
principal underwriter of the Fund;
    (3) An investment adviser, principal underwriter, or affiliated 
person of the Fund; or
    (4) Any person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, 
or under common control with an investment adviser or principal 
underwriter of the Fund.
    b. Unless disclosed in the table required by paragraph 1 of this 
Item 18 or in response to paragraph 6.a of this Item 18, indicate any 
directorships held during the past five years by each director in any 
company with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of 
the Exchange Act or subject to the requirements of Section 15(d) of the 
Exchange Act or any company registered as an investment company under 
the Investment Company Act, and name the companies in which the 
directorships were held.
    Instruction. When an individual holds the same position(s) with two 
or more portfolios that are part of the same fund complex, identify the 
fund complex and provide the number of portfolios for which the 
position(s) are held rather than listing each portfolio separately.
    7. For each director, state the dollar range of equity securities 
beneficially owned by the director as required by the following table:
    a. In the Fund; and
    b. On an aggregate basis, in any registered investment companies 
overseen by the director within the same family of investment companies 
as the Fund.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (1)                       (2)                   (3)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Name of Director           Dollar Range of      Aggregate Dollar
                                Equity Securities      Range of Equity
                                in the Registrant     Securities in All
                                                          Registered
                                                          Investment
                                                      Companies Overseen
                                                        by Director in
                                                          Family of
                                                          Investment
                                                          Companies
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Instructions.
    1. Information should be provided as of the end of the most 
recently completed calendar year. Specify the valuation date by 
footnote or otherwise.
    2. Determine ``beneficial ownership'' in accordance with Rule 16a-
1(a)(2) under the Exchange Act.
    3. In disclosing the dollar range of equity securities beneficially 
owned by a director in columns (2) and (3), use the following ranges: 
None, $1-$10,000, $10,001-$50,000, $50,001-$100,000, or over $100,000.
    8. For each director who is not an interested person of the Fund, 
as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act and the 
rules thereunder, and his immediate family members, furnish the 
information required by the following table as to each class of 
securities owned beneficially or of record in:
    a. An investment adviser or principal underwriter of the Fund; or
    b. person (other than a registered investment company) directly or 
indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with an 
investment adviser or principal underwriter of the Fund:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                (1)                            (2)                     (3)                    (4)                    (5)                    (6)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Name of Director             Name of Owners and            Company             Title of Class      Value of Securities      Percent of Class
                                         Relationships to
                                             Director
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 14540]]

    Instructions.
    1. Information should be provided as of the end of the most 
recently completed calendar year. Specify the valuation date by 
footnote or otherwise.
    2. An individual is a ``beneficial owner'' of a security if he is a 
``beneficial owner'' under either Rule 13d-3 or Rule 16a-1(a)(2) under 
the Exchange Act.
    3. Identify the company in which the director or immediate family 
member of the director owns securities in column (3). When the company 
is a person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under 
common control with an investment adviser or principal underwriter, 
describe the company's relationship with the investment adviser or 
principal underwriter.
    4. Provide the information required by columns (5) and (6) on an 
aggregate basis for each director and his immediate family members.
    9. Unless disclosed in response to paragraph 8 of this Item 18, 
describe any direct or indirect interest, the value of which exceeds 
$120,000, of each director who is not an interested person of the Fund, 
as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act and the 
rules thereunder, or immediate family member of the director, during 
the two most recently completed calendar years, in:
    a. An investment adviser or principal underwriter of the Fund; or
    b. A person (other than a registered investment company) directly 
or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with 
an investment adviser or principal underwriter of the Fund.
    Instructions.
    1. A director or immediate family member has an interest in a 
company if he is a party to a contract, arrangement, or understanding 
with respect to any securities of, or interest in, the company.
    2. The interest of the director and the interests of his immediate 
family members should be aggregated in determining whether the value 
exceeds $120,000.
    10. Describe briefly any material interest, direct or indirect, of 
any director who is not an interested person of the Fund, as defined in 
Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act and the rules 
thereunder, or immediate family member of the director, in any 
transaction, or series of similar transactions, during the two most 
recently completed calendar years, in which the amount involved exceeds 
$120,000 and to which any of the following persons was a party:
    a. The Fund;
    b. An officer of the Fund;
    c. An investment company, or a person that would be an investment 
company but for the exclusions provided by Sections 3(c)(1) and 3(c)(7) 
of the Investment Company, having the same investment adviser or 
principal underwriter as the Fund or having an investment adviser or 
principal underwriter that directly or indirectly controls, is 
controlled by, or is under common control with an investment adviser or 
principal underwriter of the Fund;
    d. An officer of an investment company, or a person that would be 
an investment company but for the exclusions provided by Sections 
3(c)(1) and 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act, having the same 
investment adviser or principal underwriter as the Fund or having an 
investment adviser or principal underwriter that directly or indirectly 
controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with an 
investment adviser or principal underwriter of the Fund;
    e. An investment adviser or principal underwriter of the Fund;
    f. An officer of an investment adviser or principal underwriter of 
the Fund;
    g. A person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or 
under common control with an investment adviser or principal 
underwriter of the Fund; or
    h. An officer of a person directly or indirectly controlling, 
controlled by, or under common control with an investment adviser or 
principal underwriter of the Fund.
    Instructions.
    1. Include the name of each director or immediate family member 
whose interest in any transaction or series of similar transactions is 
described and the nature of the circumstances by reason of which the 
interest is required to be described.
    2. State the nature of the interest, the approximate dollar amount 
involved in the transaction, and, where practicable, the approximate 
dollar amount of the interest.
    3. In computing the amount involved in the transaction or series of 
similar transactions, include all periodic payments in the case of any 
lease or other agreement providing for periodic payments.
    4. Compute the amount of the interest of any director or immediate 
family member of the director without regard to the amount of profit or 
loss involved in the transaction(s).
    5. As to any transaction involving the purchase or sale of assets, 
state the cost of the assets to the purchaser and, if acquired by the 
seller within two years prior to the transaction, the cost to the 
seller. Describe the method used in determining the purchase or sale 
price and the name of the person making the determination.
    6. Disclose indirect, as well as direct, material interests in 
transactions. A person who has a position or relationship with, or 
interest in, a company that engages in a transaction with one of the 
persons listed in paragraphs 10.a through 10.h of this Item 18 may have 
an indirect interest in the transaction by reason of the position, 
relationship, or interest. The interest in the transaction, however, 
will not be deemed ``material'' within the meaning of paragraph 10 of 
this Item 18 where the interest of the director or immediate family 
member arises solely from the holding of an equity interest (including 
a limited partnership interest, but excluding a general partnership 
interest) or a creditor interest in a company that is a party to the 
transaction with one of the persons specified in paragraphs 10.a 
through 10.h of this Item 18, and the transaction is not material to 
the company.
    7. The materiality of any interest is to be determined on the basis 
of the significance of the information to investors in light of all the 
circumstances of the particular case. The importance of the interest to 
the person having the interest, the relationship of the parties to the 
transaction with each other, and the amount involved in the transaction 
are among the factors to be considered in determining the significance 
of the information to investors.
    8. No information need be given as to any transaction where the 
interest of the director or immediate family member arises solely from 
the ownership of securities of a person specified in paragraphs 10.a 
through 10.h of this Item 18 and the director or immediate family 
member receives no extra or special benefit not shared on a pro rata 
basis by all holders of the class of securities.
    9. Transactions include loans, lines of credit, and other 
indebtedness. For indebtedness, indicate the largest aggregate amount 
of indebtedness outstanding at any time during the period, the nature 
of the indebtedness and the transaction in which it was incurred, the 
amount outstanding as of the end of the most recently completed 
calendar year, and the rate of interest paid or charged.
    10. No information need be given as to any routine, retail 
transaction. For example, the Fund need not disclose that a director 
has a credit card, bank or brokerage account, residential mortgage,

[[Page 14541]]

or insurance policy with a person specified in paragraphs 10.a through 
10.h of this Item 18 unless the director is accorded special treatment.
    11. Describe briefly any direct or indirect relationship, in which 
the amount involved exceeds $120,000, of any director who is not an 
interested person of the Fund, as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 
Investment Company Act and the rules thereunder, or immediate family 
member of the director, that existed at any time during the two most 
recently completed calendar years, with any of the persons specified in 
paragraphs 10.a through 10.h of this Item 18. Relationships include:
    a. Payments for property or services to or from any person 
specified in paragraphs 10.a through 10.h of this Item 18;
    b. Provision of legal services to any person specified in 
paragraphs 10.a through 10.h of this Item 18;
    c. Provision of investment banking services to any person specified 
in paragraphs 10.a through 10.h of this Item 18, other than as a 
participating underwriter in a syndicate; and
    d. Any consulting or other relationship that is substantially 
similar in nature and scope to the relationships listed in paragraphs 
11.a through 11.c of this Item 18.
    Instructions.
    1. Include the name of each director or immediate family member 
whose relationship is described and the nature of the circumstances by 
reason of which the relationship is required to be described.
    2. State the nature of the relationship and the amount of business 
conducted between the director or immediate family member and the 
person specified in paragraphs 10.a through 10.h of this Item 18 as a 
result of the relationship during the two most recently completed 
calendar years.
    3. In computing the amount involved in a relationship, include all 
periodic payments in the case of any agreement providing for periodic 
payments.
    4. Disclose indirect, as well as direct, relationships. A person 
who has a position or relationship with, or interest in, a company that 
has a relationship with one of the persons listed in paragraphs 10.a 
through 10.h of this Item 18 may have an indirect relationship by 
reason of the position, relationship, or interest.
    5. In determining whether the amount involved in a relationship 
exceeds $120,000, amounts involved in a relationship of the director 
should be aggregated with those of his immediate family members.
    6. In the case of an indirect interest, identify the company with 
which a person specified in paragraphs 10.a through 10.h of this Item 
18 has a relationship; the name of the director or immediate family 
member affiliated with the company and the nature of the affiliation; 
and the amount of business conducted between the company and the person 
specified in paragraphs 10.a through 10.h of this Item 18 during the 
two most recently completed calendar years.
    7. In calculating payments for property and services for purposes 
of paragraph 11.a of this Item 18, the following may be excluded:
    a. Payments where the transaction involves the rendering of 
services as a common contract carrier, or public utility, at rates or 
charges fixed in conformity with law or governmental authority; or
    b. Payments that arise solely from the ownership of securities of a 
person specified in paragraphs 10.a through 10.h of this Item 18 and no 
extra or special benefit not shared on a pro rata basis by all holders 
of the class of securities is received.
    8. No information need be given as to any routine, retail 
relationship. For example, the Fund need not disclose that a director 
has a credit card, bank or brokerage account, residential mortgage, or 
insurance policy with a person specified in paragraphs 10.a through 
10.h of this Item 18 unless the director is accorded special treatment.
    12. If an officer of an investment adviser or principal underwriter 
of the Fund, or an officer of a person directly or indirectly 
controlling, controlled by, or under common control with an investment 
adviser or principal underwriter of the Fund, served during the two 
most recently completed calendar years, on the board of directors of a 
company where a director of the Fund who is not an interested person of 
the Fund, as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act 
and the rules thereunder, or immediate family member of the director, 
was during the two most recently completed calendar years, an officer, 
identify:
    a. The company;
    b. The individual who serves or has served as a director of the 
company and the period of service as director;
    c. The investment adviser or principal underwriter or person 
controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment 
adviser or principal underwriter where the individual named in 
paragraph 12.b of this Item 18 holds or held office and the office 
held; and
    d. The director of the Fund or immediate family member who is or 
was an officer of the company; the office held; and the period of 
holding the office.
    13. In the case of a Fund that is not a business development 
company, provide the following for all directors of the Fund, all 
members of the advisory board of the Fund, and for each of the three 
highest paid officers or any affiliated person of the Fund with 
aggregate compensation from the Fund for the most recently completed 
fiscal year in excess of $60,000 (``Compensated Persons'').
    a. Furnish the information required by the following table:

                                               Compensation Table
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               (1)                        (2)                 (3)                 (4)                 (5)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Name of Person, Position           Aggregate          Pension or       Estimated Annual   Total Compensation
                                   Compensation From       Retirement        Benefits Upon       From Fund and
                                          Fund          Benefits Accrued       Retirement      Fund Complex Paid
                                                        As Part of Fund                           to Directors
                                                            Expenses
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Instructions.
    1. For column (1), indicate, if necessary, the capacity in which 
the remuneration is received. For Compensated Persons that are 
directors of the Fund, compensation is amounts received for service as 
a director.
    2. If the Fund has not completed its first full year since its 
organization, furnish the information for the current fiscal year, 
estimating future payments that would be made pursuant to an existing 
agreement or understanding. Disclose in a footnote to the Compensation 
Table the period for which the information is furnished.
    3. Include in column (2) amounts deferred at the election of the 
Compensated Person, whether pursuant to a plan established under 
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code [26

[[Page 14542]]

U.S.C. 401(k)] or otherwise for the fiscal year in which earned. 
Disclose in a footnote to the Compensation Table the total amount of 
deferred compensation (including interest) payable to or accrued for 
any Compensated Person.
    4. Include in columns (3) and (4) all pension or retirement 
benefits proposed to be paid under any existing plan in the event of 
retirement at normal retirement date, directly or indirectly, by the 
Fund, any of its subsidiaries, or other companies in the Fund Complex. 
Omit column (4) where retirement benefits are not determinable.
    5. For any defined benefit or actuarial plan under which benefits 
are determined primarily by final compensation (or average final 
compensation) and years of service, provide the information required in 
column (4) in a separate table showing estimated annual benefits 
payable upon retirement (including amounts attributable to any defined 
benefit supplementary or excess pension award plans) in specified 
compensation and years of service classifications. Also provide the 
estimated credited years of service for each Compensated Person.
    6. Include in column (5) only aggregate compensation paid to a 
director for service on the board and all other boards of investment 
companies in a Fund Complex specifying the number of such other 
investment companies.
    b. Describe briefly the material provisions of any pension, 
retirement, or other plan or any arrangement other than fee 
arrangements disclosed in paragraph (a) pursuant to which Compensated 
Persons are or may be compensated for any services provided, including 
amounts paid, if any, to the Compensated Person under any such 
arrangements during the most recently completed fiscal year. 
Specifically include the criteria used to determine amounts payable 
under the plan, the length of service or vesting period required by the 
plan, the retirement age or other event which gives rise to payments 
under the plan, and whether the payment of benefits is secured or 
funded by the Fund.
    14. In the case of a Fund that is a business development company, 
provide the information required by Item 402 of Regulation S-K [17 CFR 
229.402].
    15. Codes of Ethics. Provide a brief statement disclosing whether 
the Fund and its investment adviser and principal underwriter have 
adopted codes of ethics under Rule 17j-1 under the Investment Company 
Act and whether these codes of ethics permit personnel subject to the 
codes to invest in securities, including securities that may be 
purchased or held by the Fund. Also, explain in the statement that 
these codes of ethics are available on the EDGAR Database on the 
Commission's internet site at http://www.sec.gov, and that copies of 
these codes of ethics may be obtained, after paying a duplicating fee, 
by electronic request at the following email address: 
[email protected].
    Instruction. A Fund that is not required to adopt a code of ethics 
under Rule 17j-1 under the Investment Company Act is not required to 
respond to this Item.
    16. Unless the Fund invests exclusively in non-voting securities, 
describe the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine 
how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities, including the 
procedures that the Fund uses when a vote presents a conflict between 
the interests of the Fund's shareholders, on the one hand, and those of 
the Fund's investment adviser; principal underwriter; or any affiliated 
person (as defined in Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act and 
the rules thereunder) of the Fund, its investment adviser, or its 
principal underwriter, on the other. Include any policies and 
procedures of the Fund's investment adviser, or any other third party, 
that the Fund uses, or that are used on the Fund's behalf, to determine 
how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities. Also, state that 
information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio 
securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is 
available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling a specified 
toll-free (or collect) telephone number; sending an email to a 
specified email address, if any; or on or through the Fund's website at 
a specified internet address; and (ii) on the Commission's website at 
http://www.sec.gov.
    Instructions.
    1. A Fund may satisfy the requirement to provide a description of 
the policies and procedures that it uses to determine how to vote 
proxies relating to portfolio securities by including a copy of the 
policies and procedures themselves.
    2. If a Fund discloses that the Fund's proxy voting record is 
available by calling a toll-free (or collect) telephone number or 
sending an email to a specified email address, if any, and the Fund (or 
financial intermediary through which shares of the Fund may be 
purchased or sold) receives a request for this information, the Fund 
(or financial intermediary) must send the information disclosed in the 
Fund's most recently filed report on Form N-PX, within 3 business days 
of receipt of the request, by first-class mail or other means designed 
to ensure equally prompt delivery.
    3. If a Fund discloses that the Fund's proxy voting record is 
available on or through its website, the Fund must make available free 
of charge the information disclosed in the Fund's most recently filed 
report on Form N-PX on or through its website as soon as reasonably 
practicable after filing the report with the Commission. The 
information disclosed in the Fund's most recently filed report on Form 
N-PX must remain available on or through the Fund's website for as long 
as the Fund remains subject to the requirements of Rule 30b1-4 under 
the Investment Company Act and discloses that the Fund's proxy voting 
record is available on or through its website.
    17. For each director, briefly discuss the specific experience, 
qualifications, attributes, or skills that led to the conclusion that 
the person should serve as a director for the Fund at the time that the 
disclosure is made, in light of the Fund's business and structure. If 
material, this disclosure should cover more than the past five years, 
including information about the person's particular areas of expertise 
or other relevant qualifications.

Item 19. Control Persons and Principal Holders of Securities

    Furnish the following information as of a specified date no more 
than 30 days prior to the date of filing of the registration statement 
or amendment to it.
    1. State the name and address of each person who controls the Fund, 
and briefly explain the effect of such control on the voting rights of 
other shareholders. For each control person, state the percentage of 
the Fund's voting securities owned or any other basis of control. If 
the control person is a company, disclose the state or other 
jurisdiction under the laws of which it is organized. List all parents 
of each control person.
    Instructions.
    1. The term ``control'' is defined in the instruction to Item 9.3 
of this Form.
    2. A Fund that is controlled by its adviser or underwriter(s) 
before the effective date of the registration statement need not 
respond to this Item if, immediately after the public offering, there 
will be no control person.
    2. State the name, address, and percentage of ownership of each 
person who owns of record or is known by the Fund to own of record or 
beneficially five percent or more of any class of the Fund's 
outstanding equity securities.
    Instructions.

[[Page 14543]]

    1. Calculate the percentages on the basis of the amount of common 
stock outstanding.
    2. If securities are being registered in connection with or 
pursuant to a plan of acquisition, reorganization, readjustment, or 
succession, indicate, to the extent practicable, the status to exist 
upon consummation of the plan on the basis of present holdings and 
commitments.
    3. If, to the knowledge of the Fund or any principal underwriter of 
its securities, five percent or more of any class of voting securities 
of the Fund are or will be held subject to any voting trust or other 
similar agreement, disclose this fact.
    4. Indicate whether the securities are owned both of record and 
beneficially, or of record only, or beneficially only, and disclose the 
respective percentage owned in each manner.
    3. Disclose all equity securities of the Fund owned by all 
officers, directors, and members of the advisory board of the Fund as a 
group, without naming them. In any case where the amount owned by 
directors and officers as a group is less than one percent of the 
class, a statement to that effect is sufficient.

Item 20. Investment Advisory and Other Services

    1. Furnish the following information about each investment adviser:
    a. The names of all controlling persons, the basis of such control, 
and, if material, the business history of any organization that 
controls the adviser;
    b. the names of any affiliated person of the Fund who is also an 
affiliated person of the investment adviser and a list of all 
capacities in which such person named is affiliated with the Fund and/
or with the investment adviser; and
    Instruction. If an affiliated person of the Fund, either alone or 
together with others, is a controlling person of the investment 
adviser, the Fund must disclose that fact but need not supply the 
specific amount of percentage of the outstanding voting securities of 
the investment adviser that are owned by the controlling person.
    c. the method of computing the advisory fee payable by the Fund, 
including:
    (1) The total dollar amounts paid to the adviser by the Fund under 
the investment advisory contract for the last three fiscal years;
    (2) if applicable, any credits that reduced the advisory fee for 
any of the last fiscal years; and
    (3) any expense limitation provision.
    Instructions.
    1. If the advisory fee payable by the Fund varies depending on the 
Fund's investment performance in relation to some standard, set forth 
the standard along with a fee schedule in tabular form. The Fund may 
include examples showing the fees the adviser would earn at various 
levels of performance, but such examples must include calculations 
showing the maximum and minimum fee percentages that could be earned 
under the contract.
    2. State each type of credit or offset separately.
    3. Where the Fund is subject to more than one expense limitation 
provision, describe only the most restrictive provision.
    2. Concisely describe all services performed for or on behalf of 
the Fund that are supplied or paid for wholly or in substantial part by 
the investment adviser in connection with the investment advisory 
contract.
    3. Describe briefly all fees, expenses, and costs of the Fund that 
are to be paid by persons other than the investment adviser or the 
Fund, and identify such persons.
    4. Summarize any management-related service contract under which 
services are provided to the Fund that is not otherwise disclosed in 
response to an Item of this Form and may be of interest to a purchaser 
of the Fund's securities, indicating the parties to the contract and 
the total dollars paid, and by whom, for the past three years.
    Instructions.
    1. A ``management-related service contract'' includes any agreement 
whereby another person contracts with the Fund to keep, prepare, and/or 
file accounts, books, records, or other documents that the Fund may be 
required to keep under federal or state law, or to provide any similar 
services with respect to the daily administration of the Fund, but does 
not include the following: (1) Any contract with the Fund to provide 
investment advice; (2) any agreement to act as custodian, transfer 
agent, or dividend-paying agent; and (3) bona fide contracts for 
outside legal or auditing services, or bona fide contracts for personal 
employment entered into in the ordinary course of business.
    2. No information is required about the service of mailing proxies 
or periodic reports to shareholders of the Fund.
    3. In summarizing the substantive provisions of a management-
related service contract, include: (1) The name of the person providing 
the service; (2) any direct or indirect relationship of that person 
with the Fund, its investment adviser, or its principal underwriter; 
(3) the nature of the services provided; and (4) the basis of the 
compensation paid for the last three fiscal years.
    5. If any person (other than a bona fide director, officer, member 
of an advisory board, employee of the Fund, or a person named as an 
investment adviser in response to paragraph 1 of this Item), pursuant 
to any understanding, whether formal or informal, regularly furnishes 
advice to the Fund or the investment adviser of the Fund with respect 
to the desirability of the Fund's investing in, purchasing, or selling 
securities or other property, or is empowered to determine which 
securities or other property should be purchased or sold by the Fund, 
and receives direct or indirect remuneration from the Fund, furnish the 
following information:
    a. The name of the person;
    b. a description of the nature of the arrangement and the advice or 
information given; and
    c. any remuneration (including, for example, participation, 
directly or indirectly, in commissions or other compensation paid in 
connection with transactions in the Fund's portfolio securities) paid 
for the advice or information, and a statement as to how and by whom 
such remuneration was paid for the last three fiscal years.
    Instruction. No information is required with respect to any of the 
following:
    1. Persons whose advice was furnished solely through uniform 
publications distributed to subscribers;
    2. persons who furnished only statistical and other factual 
information, advice regarding economic factors and trends, or advice as 
to occasional transactions in specific securities, but without 
generally furnishing advice or making recommendations regarding the 
purchase or sale of securities by the Fund;
    3. a company that is excluded from the definition of ``investment 
adviser'' of an investment company by reason of Section 2(a)(20)(iii) 
of the Investment Company Act;
    4. any person the character and amount of whose compensation for 
such service must be approved by a court; or
    5. such other persons as the Commission has by rules and 
regulations or order determined not to be an ``investment adviser'' of 
an investment company.
    6. Furnish the name and principal business address of each of the 
Fund's custodians, the nature of the business of each such person, and 
a general description of the services performed by each.

[[Page 14544]]

    7. Furnish the name and principal business address of the Fund's 
independent public accountant, and provide a general description of the 
services performed by such person.
    8. If an affiliated person of the Fund, or an affiliated person of 
an affiliated person of the Fund, acts as custodian, transfer agent, or 
dividend-paying agent for the Fund, furnish a description of the 
services performed by that person and the basis for remuneration (e.g., 
the method by which that person's fee is calculated).

Item 21. Portfolio Managers

    1. Other Accounts Managed. If a Portfolio Manager required to be 
identified in response to Item 9.1.c is primarily responsible for the 
day-to-day management of the portfolio of any other account, provide 
the following information:
    a. The Portfolio Manager's name;
    b. The number of other accounts managed within each of the 
following categories and the total assets in the accounts managed 
within each category:
    (1) Registered investment companies;
    (2) Other pooled investment vehicles; and
    (3) Other accounts.
    c. For each of the categories in Item 21.1.b, the number of 
accounts and the total assets in the accounts with respect to which the 
advisory fee is based on the performance of the account; and
    d. A description of any material conflicts of interest that may 
arise in connection with the Portfolio Manager's management of the 
Fund's investments, on the one hand, and the investments of the other 
accounts included in response to Item 21.1.b, on the other. This 
description would include, for example, material conflicts between the 
investment strategy of the Fund and the investment strategy of other 
accounts managed by the Portfolio Manager and material conflicts in 
allocation of investment opportunities between the Fund and other 
accounts managed by the Portfolio Manager.
    Instructions.
    1. Provide the information required by Item 21.1 as of the end of 
the Fund's most recently completed fiscal year, except that, in the 
case of an initial registration statement or an update to the Fund's 
registration statement that discloses a new Portfolio Manager, 
information with respect to any newly identified Portfolio Manager must 
be provided as of the most recent practicable date. Disclose the date 
as of which the information is provided.
    2. If a committee, team, or other group of persons that includes 
the Portfolio Manager is jointly and primarily responsible for the day-
to-day management of the portfolio of an account, include the account 
in responding to Item 21.1.
    2. Compensation. Describe the structure of, and the method used to 
determine, the compensation of each Portfolio Manager required to be 
identified in response to Item 9.1.c. For each type of compensation 
(e.g., salary, bonus, deferred compensation, retirement plans and 
arrangements), describe with specificity the criteria on which that 
type of compensation is based, for example, whether compensation is 
fixed, whether (and, if so, how) compensation is based on the Fund's 
pre- or after-tax performance over a certain time period, and whether 
(and, if so, how) compensation is based on the value of assets held in 
the Fund's portfolio. For example, if compensation is based solely or 
in part on performance, identify any benchmark used to measure 
performance and state the length of the period over which performance 
is measured.
    Instructions.
    1. Provide the information required by Item 21.2 as of the end of 
the Fund's most recently completed fiscal year, except that, in the 
case of an initial registration statement or an update to the Fund's 
registration statement that discloses a new Portfolio Manager, 
information with respect to any newly identified Portfolio Manager must 
be provided as of the most recent practicable date. Disclose the date 
as of which the information is provided.
    2. Compensation includes, without limitation, salary, bonus, 
deferred compensation, and pension and retirement plans and 
arrangements, whether the compensation is cash or non-cash. Group life, 
health, hospitalization, medical reimbursement, and pension and 
retirement plans and arrangements may be omitted, provided that they do 
not discriminate in scope, terms, or operation in favor of the 
Portfolio Manager or a group of employees that includes the Portfolio 
Manager and are available generally to all salaried employees. The 
value of compensation is not required to be disclosed under this Item.
    3. Include a description of the structure of, and the method used 
to determine, any compensation received by the Portfolio Manager from 
the Fund, the Fund's investment adviser, or any other source with 
respect to management of the Fund and any other accounts included in 
the response to Item 21.1.b. This description must clearly disclose any 
differences between the method used to determine the Portfolio 
Manager's compensation with respect to the Fund and other accounts, 
e.g., if the Portfolio Manager receives part of an advisory fee that is 
based on performance with respect to some accounts but not the Fund, 
this must be disclosed.
    3. Ownership of Securities. For each Portfolio Manager required to 
be identified in response to Item 9.1.c, state the dollar range of 
equity securities in the Fund beneficially owned by the Portfolio 
Manager using the following ranges: None; $1-$10,000; $10,001-$50,000; 
$50,001-$100,000; $100,001-$500,000; $500,001-$1,000,000; or over 
$1,000,000.
    Instructions.
    1. Provide the information required by Item 21.3 as of the end of 
the Fund's most recently completed fiscal year, except that, in the 
case of an initial registration statement or an update to the Fund's 
registration statement that discloses a new Portfolio Manager, 
information with respect to any newly identified Portfolio Manager must 
be provided as of the most recent practicable date. Specify the 
valuation date.
    2. Determine ``beneficial ownership'' in accordance with Rule 16a-
1(a)(2) under the Exchange Act.

Item 22. Brokerage Allocation and Other Practices

    1. Concisely describe how transactions in portfolio securities are 
or will be effected. Provide a general statement about brokerage 
commissions and mark-ups on principal transactions and the aggregate 
amount of any brokerage commissions paid by the Fund during the three 
most recent fiscal years. Concisely explain any material change in 
brokerage commissions paid by the Fund during the most recent fiscal 
year as compared to the two prior fiscal years.
    2. a. State the total dollar amount, if any, of brokerage 
commissions paid by the Fund during the three most recent fiscal years 
to any broker that: (1) Is an affiliated person of the Fund; (2) is an 
affiliated person of an affiliated person of the Fund; or (3) has an 
affiliated person that is an affiliated person of the Fund, its 
investment adviser, or principal underwriter. In the case of an initial 
public offering, disclose whether or not the Fund intends to use any 
brokers described in this subparagraph, a. Identify each broker, and 
state the relationships that cause the broker to be identified in this 
Item.
    b. State for each broker identified in response to paragraph 2.a of 
this Item:
    (1) The percentage of the Fund's aggregate brokerage commissions 
paid

[[Page 14545]]

to the broker during the most recent fiscal year; and
    (2) the percentage of the Fund's aggregate dollar amount of 
transactions involving the payment of commissions effected through the 
broker during the most recent fiscal year.
    c. Where there is a material difference in the percentage of 
brokerage commissions paid to, and the percentage of transactions 
effected through, any broker identified in response to paragraph 2.a of 
this Item, state the reasons for the difference.
    3. Describe briefly how brokers will be selected to effect 
securities transactions for the Fund and how evaluations will be made 
of the overall reasonableness of brokerage commissions paid, including 
the factors considered.
    Instructions.
    1. If the receipt of products or services other than brokerage or 
research services is a factor considered in the selection of brokers, 
specify the products and services.
    2. If the receipt of research services is a factor in selecting 
brokers, identify the nature of the research services.
    3. State whether persons acting on behalf of the Fund are 
authorized to pay a broker a commission in excess of that which another 
broker might have charged for effecting the same transaction because of 
the value of brokerage or research services provided by the broker.
    4. If applicable, explain that research services furnished by 
brokers through whom the Fund effects securities transactions may be 
used by the Fund's investment adviser in servicing all of its accounts 
and that not all the services may be used by the investment adviser in 
connection with the Fund; or, if other policies or practices are 
applicable to the Fund with respect to the allocation of research 
services provided by brokers, concisely explain the policies and 
practices.
    5. Funds should refer to Rule 17e-1 under the Investment Company 
Act with respect to securities transactions executed by exchange 
members.
    4. If during the last fiscal year the Fund or its investment 
adviser, pursuant to an agreement or understanding with a broker or 
otherwise through an internal allocation procedure, directed the Fund's 
brokerage transactions to a broker because of research services 
provided, state the amount of the transactions and related commissions.
    5. If the Fund has acquired during its most recent fiscal year or 
during the period of time since organization, whichever is shorter, 
securities of its regular brokers or dealers, as defined in Rule 10b-1 
under the Investment Company Act, or their parents, identify those 
brokers or dealers, and state the value of the Fund's aggregate 
holdings of the securities of each subject issuer as of the close of 
the Fund's most recent fiscal year.
    Instruction. The Fund need only disclose information with respect 
to the parent of a broker or dealer that derived more than fifteen 
percent of its gross revenues from the business of a broker, a dealer, 
an underwriter, or an investment adviser.

Item 23. Tax Status

    Provide information about the Fund's tax status that is not 
required to be in the prospectus but that the Fund believes is of 
interest to investors, including, but not limited to, an explanation of 
the legal basis for the Fund's tax status. If the Fund is qualified or 
intends to qualify under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code and 
has not disclosed that fact in the prospectus, then disclosure of that 
fact will be sufficient. If not otherwise disclosed, concisely describe 
any special or unusual tax aspects of the Fund, e.g., taxes resulting 
from foreign investment or from status as a personal holding company, 
or any tax loss carry-forward to which the Fund may be entitled.

Item 24. Financial Statements

    Provide the financial statements of the Fund.
    Instructions.
    1. a. Furnish, in a separate section following the responses to the 
above items in Part B of the registration statement, the financial 
statements and schedules required by Regulation S-X [17 CFR part 210]. 
(See Section 210.3-18 and Sections 210.6-01 through 210.6-10 of 
Regulation S-X.)
    b. A business development company that has had at least one fiscal 
year of operations need provide financial statements under Item 8.6.c 
of Part A only. A business development company with less than one 
fiscal year of operations should refer to Item 8.6.c of Part A and 
Instructions 1 and 2 thereunder in responding to this Item 24.
    2. Notwithstanding the requirements of Instruction 1 above, the 
following statements and schedules required by Regulation S-X may be 
omitted from Part B and included in Part C of the registration 
statement:
    a. The statement of any subsidiary that is not a majority-owned 
subsidiary; and
    b. Columns C and D of Schedule III [17 CFR 210.12-14].
    3. In addition to the requirements of Rule 3-18 of Regulation S-X 
[17 CFR 210.3-18], any company registered under the Investment Company 
Act that has not previously had an effective registration statement 
under the Securities Act shall include in its initial registration 
statement under the Securities Act such additional financial statements 
and financial highlights (which need not be audited) as are necessary 
to make the financial statements and financial highlights included in 
the registration statement as of a date within 90 days prior to the 
date of filing.
    4. Every annual report to shareholders required by Section 30(e) of 
the Investment Company Act and Rule 30e-1 thereunder shall contain the 
following information:
    a. The audited financial statements required by Regulation S-X for 
the periods specified by Regulation S-X, modified to permit the 
omission of the statements and schedules that may be omitted from Part 
B of the registration statement by Instruction 2 above and as permitted 
by Instruction 7 below;
    b. the financial highlights required by Item 4.1 of this Form, for 
the five most recent fiscal years, with at least the most recent year 
audited;
    c. unless shown elsewhere in the report as part of the financial 
statements required by a above, the aggregate remuneration paid by the 
company during the period covered by the report (1) to all directors 
and to all members of any advisory board for regular compensation; (2) 
to each director and to each member of an advisory board for special 
compensation; (3) to all officers; and (4) to each person of whom any 
officer or director of the company is an affiliated person;
    d. the information concerning changes in and disagreements with 
accountants and on accounting and financial disclosure required by Item 
304 of Regulation S-K [17 CFR 229.304];
    e. the management information required by paragraph 1 of Item 18; 
and
    f. a statement that the SAI includes additional information about 
directors of the Fund and is available, without charge, upon request, 
and a toll-free (or collect) telephone number and email address, if 
any, for shareholders to use to request the SAI.
    g. Management's Discussion of Fund Performance. Disclose the 
following information:
    (1) Discuss the factors that materially affected the Fund's 
performance during the most recently completed fiscal year, including 
the relevant market

[[Page 14546]]

conditions and the investment strategies and techniques used by the 
Fund. The information presented may include tables, charts, and other 
graphical depictions.
    (2) (A) Provide a line graph comparing the initial and subsequent 
account values at the end of each of the most recently completed 10 
fiscal years of the Fund (or for the life of the Fund, if shorter), but 
only for periods subsequent to the effective date of the Fund's 
registration statement. Assume a $10,000 initial investment at the 
beginning of the first fiscal year in an appropriate broad-based 
securities market index for the same period.
    1. Line Graph Computation.
    (a) Assume that the initial investment was made at the offering 
price last calculated on the business day before the first day of the 
first fiscal year.
    (b) Base subsequent account values on the market price (or, if 
shares are not listed, the net asset value) of the Fund on the last 
business day of the first and each subsequent fiscal year.
    (c) Calculate the final account value by assuming the account was 
closed and sale was at the market price (or, if shares are not listed, 
the net asset value) on the last business day of the most recent fiscal 
year.
    (d) Base the line graph on the Fund's required minimum initial 
investment if that amount exceeds $10,000.
    2. Multiple Class Funds. The Fund can select which Class to 
include, consistent with the requirements of Instruction 3(a) to Item 
4(b)(2) of Form N-1A.
    (B) In a table placed within or next to the graph, provide the 
Fund's average annual total returns for the 1-, 5-, and 10-year periods 
as of the end of the last day of the most recent fiscal year (or for 
the life of the Fund, if shorter), but only for periods subsequent to 
the effective date of the Fund's registration statement. Average annual 
total returns should be computed in accordance with Item 26(b)(1) of 
Form N-1A, except with respect to reinvestments of dividends and 
distributions, which must be calculated consistent with Item 4 of this 
Form. Include a statement accompanying the graph and table to the 
effect that past performance does not predict future performance and 
that the graph and table do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a 
shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the sale of fund shares.
    (C) Sales Load. Reflect any sales load (or any other fees charged 
at the time of purchasing shares or opening an account) by beginning 
the line graph at the amount that actually would be invested (i.e., 
assume that the maximum sales load, and other charges deducted from 
payments, is deducted from the initial $10,000 investment). For a Fund 
whose shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales load, assume 
the deduction of the maximum deferred sales load (or other charges) 
that would apply for a complete sale that received the market price 
(or, if shares are not listed, the net asset value) on the last 
business day of the most recent fiscal year. For any other deferred 
sales load, repurchase fee, or withdrawal charge, assume that the 
deduction is in the amount(s) and at the time(s) that the sales load, 
repurchase fee, or withdrawal charge actually would have been deducted.
    (D) Dividends and Distributions. Assume reinvestment of all of the 
Fund's dividends and distributions on the reinvestment dates during the 
period, and reflect any sales load imposed upon reinvestment of 
dividends or distributions or both.
    (E) Account Fees. Reflect recurring fees that are charged to all 
accounts.
    1. For any account fees that vary with the size of the account, 
assume a $10,000 account size.
    2. Reflect, as appropriate, any recurring fees charged to 
shareholder accounts that are paid other than by sale of the Fund's 
shares.
    3. Reflect an annual account fee that applies to more than one Fund 
by allocating the fee in the following manner: Divide the total amount 
of account fees collected during the year by the Funds' total average 
market price, multiply the resulting percentage by the average account 
value for each Fund and reduce the value of each hypothetical account 
at the end of each fiscal year during which the fee was charged.
    (F) Appropriate Index. For purposes of this Item, an ``appropriate 
broad-based securities market index'' is one that is administered by an 
organization that is not an affiliated person of the Fund, its 
investment adviser, or principal underwriter, unless the index is 
widely recognized and used. Adjust the index to reflect the 
reinvestment of dividends on securities in the index, but do not 
reflect the expenses of the Fund.
    (G) Additional Indexes. A Fund is encouraged to compare its 
performance not only to the required broad-based index, but also to 
other more narrowly based indexes that reflect the market sectors in 
which the Fund invests. A Fund also may compare its performance to an 
additional broad-based index, or to a non-securities index (e.g., the 
Consumer Price Index), so long as the comparison is not misleading.
    (H) Change in Index. If the Fund uses an index that is different 
from the one used for the immediately preceding fiscal year, explain 
the reason(s) for the change and compare the Fund's annual change in 
the value of an investment in the hypothetical account with the new and 
former indexes.
    (I) Other Periods. The line graph may cover earlier fiscal years 
and may compare the ending values of interim periods (e.g., monthly or 
quarterly ending values), so long as those periods are after the 
effective date of the Fund's registration statement.
    (J) Scale. The axis of the graph measuring dollar amounts may use 
either a linear or a logarithmic scale.
    (K) New Funds. A New Fund is not required to include the 
information specified by this Item in its prospectus (or annual 
report), unless Form N-2 (or the annual report) contains audited 
financial statements covering a period of at least 6 months.
    (L) Change in Investment Adviser. If the Fund has not had the same 
investment adviser for the previous 10 fiscal years, the Fund may begin 
the line graph on the date that the current adviser began to provide 
advisory services to the Fund so long as:
    1. Neither the current adviser nor any affiliate is or has been in 
``control'' of the previous adviser under Section 2(a)(9) of the 
Investment Company Act;
    2. The current adviser employs no officer(s) of the previous 
adviser or employees of the previous adviser who were responsible for 
providing investment advisory or portfolio management services to the 
Fund; and
    3. The graph is accompanied by a statement explaining that previous 
periods during which the Fund was advised by another investment adviser 
are not shown.
    (3) Discuss the effect of any policy or practice of maintaining a 
specified level of distributions to shareholders on the Fund's 
investment strategies and per share net asset value during the last 
fiscal year. Also discuss the extent to which the Fund's distribution 
policy resulted in distributions of capital.
    h. If the Fund has filed a registration statement pursuant to 
General Instruction A.2:
    (1) Senior Securities. Include the information required by Item 
4.3.
    (2) Fee and Expense Table. Include the information required by Item 
3.1.
    (3) Share Price Data. Include the information required by Item 8.5.
    (4) Unresolved Staff Comments. If the Fund has received written 
comments from the Commission staff regarding its periodic or current 
reports under the Exchange Act or Investment Company

[[Page 14547]]

Act or its registration statement not less than 180 days before the end 
of its fiscal period to which the annual report relates, and such 
comments remain unresolved, disclose the substance of any such 
unresolved comments that the Fund believes are material. Such 
disclosure may provide other information including the position of the 
Fund with respect to any such comment.
    5. Every report to shareholders required by Section 30(e) of the 
Investment Company Act and Rule 30e-1 thereunder, except the annual 
report, shall contain the following information (which need not be 
audited):
    a. The financial statements required by Regulation S-X for the 
period commencing either with (1) the beginning of the company's fiscal 
year (or date of organization, if newly organized); or (2) a date not 
later than the date after the close of the period included in the last 
report conforming with the requirements of Rule 30e-1 and the most 
recent preceding fiscal year, modified to permit the omission of the 
statements and schedules that may be omitted from Part B of the 
registration statement by Instruction 2 above and as permitted by 
Instruction 7 below;
    b. the financial highlights required by Item 4.1 of this Form, for 
the period of the report as specified by subparagraph a of this 
instruction, and the most recent preceding fiscal year;
    c. unless shown elsewhere in the report as part of the financial 
statements required by subparagraph a of this instruction, the 
aggregate remuneration paid by the company during the period covered by 
the report (1) to all directors and to all members of any advisory 
board for regular compensation; (2) to each director and to each member 
of an advisory board for special compensation; (3) to all officers; and 
(4) to each person of whom an officer or director of the company is an 
affiliated person; and
    d. the information concerning changes in and disagreements with 
accountants and on accounting and financial disclosure required by Item 
304 of Regulation S-K.
    6. Every annual and semi-annual report to shareholders required by 
Section 30(e) of the Investment Company Act and Rule 30e-1 thereunder 
shall contain the following information:
    a. One or more tables, charts, or graphs depicting the portfolio 
holdings of the Fund by reasonably identifiable categories (e.g., type 
of security, industry sector, geographic region, credit quality, or 
maturity) showing the percentage of net asset value or total 
investments attributable to each. The categories and the basis of 
presentation (e.g., net asset value or total investments) should be 
selected, and the presentation should be formatted, in a manner 
reasonably designed to depict clearly the types of investments made by 
the Fund, given its investment objectives. If the Fund depicts 
portfolio holdings according to credit quality, it should include a 
description of how the credit quality of the holdings were determined, 
and if credit ratings, as defined in Section 3(a)(60) of the Exchange 
Act, assigned by a credit rating agency, as defined in Section 3(a)(61) 
of the Exchange Act, are used, explain how they were identified and 
selected. This description should be included near, or as part of, the 
graphical representation.
    b. Statement Regarding Availability of Quarterly Portfolio 
Schedule. A statement that: (i) The Fund files its complete schedule of 
portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of 
each fiscal year as an exhibit to its reports on Form N-PORT; (ii) the 
Fund's Form N-PORT reports are available on the Commission's website at 
http://www.sec.gov; (iii) if the Fund makes the information on Form N-
PORT available to shareholders on its website or upon request, a 
description of how the information may be obtained from the Fund.
    c. A statement that a description of the policies and procedures 
that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to 
portfolio securities is available (1) without charge, upon request, by 
calling a specified toll-free (or collect) telephone number or sending 
an email to a specified email address, if any; (2) on the Fund's 
website, if applicable; and (3) on the Commission's website at http://www.sec.gov; and
    d. A statement that information regarding how the Fund voted 
proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-
month period ended June 30 is available (1) without charge, upon 
request, by calling a specified toll-free (or collect) telephone 
number; sending an email to a specified email address, if any; or on or 
through the Fund's website at a specified internet address; and (2) on 
the Commission's website at http://www.sec.gov.
    e. If the Fund's board of directors approved any investment 
advisory contract during the Fund's most recent fiscal half-year, 
discuss in reasonable detail the material factors and the conclusions 
with respect thereto that formed the basis for the board's approval. 
Include the following in the discussion:
    (1) Factors relating to both the board's selection of the 
investment adviser and approval of the advisory fee and any other 
amounts to be paid by the Fund under the contract. This would include, 
but not be limited to, a discussion of the nature, extent, and quality 
of the services to be provided by the investment adviser; the 
investment performance of the Fund and the investment adviser; the 
costs of the services to be provided and profits to be realized by the 
investment adviser and its affiliates from the relationship with the 
Fund; the extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the 
Fund grows; and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for 
the benefit of the Fund's investors. Also indicate in the discussion 
whether the board relied upon comparisons of the services to be 
rendered and the amounts to be paid under the contract with those under 
other investment advisory contracts, such as contracts of the same and 
other investment advisers with other registered investment companies or 
other types of clients (e.g., pension funds and other institutional 
investors). If the board relied upon such comparisons, describe the 
comparisons that were relied on and how they assisted the board in 
concluding that the contract should be approved; and
    (2) If applicable, any benefits derived or to be derived by the 
investment adviser from the relationship with the Fund such as soft 
dollar arrangements by which brokers provide research to the Fund or 
its investment adviser in return for allocating the Fund's brokerage.
    f. Board approvals covered by Instruction 6.e to this Item include 
both approvals of new investment advisory contracts and approvals of 
contract renewals. Investment advisory contracts covered by Instruction 
6.e include subadvisory contracts. Conclusory statements or a list of 
factors will not be considered sufficient disclosure under Instruction 
6.e. Relate the factors to the specific circumstances of the Fund and 
the investment advisory contract and state how the board evaluated each 
factor. For example, it is not sufficient to state that the board 
considered the amount of the investment advisory fee without stating 
what the board concluded about the amount of the fee and how that 
affected its decision to approve the contract. If any factor enumerated 
in Instruction 6.e(1) to this Item is not relevant to the board's 
evaluation of an investment advisory contract, note this and explain 
the reasons why the factor is not relevant.

[[Page 14548]]

    g. Include on the front cover page or at the beginning of the 
annual or semi-annual report a statement to the following effect, if 
applicable:
    Beginning on [date], as permitted by regulations adopted by the 
Securities and Exchange Commission, paper copies of the Fund's 
shareholder reports like this one will no longer be sent by mail, 
unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports from the 
Fund [or from your financial intermediary, such as a broker-dealer or 
bank]. Instead, the reports will be made available on a website, and 
you will be notified by mail each time a report is posted and provided 
with a website link to access the report.
    If you already elected to receive shareholder reports 
electronically, you will not be affected by this change and you need 
not take any action. You may elect to receive shareholder reports and 
other communications from the Fund [or your financial intermediary] 
electronically by [insert instructions].
    You may elect to receive all future reports in paper free of 
charge. You can inform the Fund [or your financial intermediary] that 
you wish to continue receiving paper copies of your shareholder reports 
by [insert instructions]. Your election to receive reports in paper 
will apply to all funds held with [the fund complex/your financial 
intermediary].
    h. Disclose any information the Fund was required to disclose in a 
report on Form 8-K and that the Fund has not reported during the 
relevant period. If disclosure of such information is made under this 
instruction, it need not be repeated in a report on Form 8-K that would 
otherwise be required to be filed with respect to such information or 
in a subsequent annual or semi-annual report to shareholders.
    i. A Fund that files a registration statement pursuant to General 
Instruction A.2, and includes in any annual or semi-annual report to 
shareholders or periodic report filed under the Exchange Act 
information not otherwise required to be included in the report in 
order to update the Fund's prospectus or SAI, must include a statement 
in the report identifying all information included for this purpose.
    7. Schedule IX--Summary schedule of investments in securities of 
unaffiliated issuers [17 CFR 210.12-12C] may be included in the 
financial statements required under Instructions 4.a and 5.a of this 
Item in lieu of Schedule I--Investments in securities of unaffiliated 
issuers [17 CFR 210.12-12] if:
    a. The Fund states in the report that the Fund's complete schedule 
of investments in securities of unaffiliated issuers is available (i) 
without charge, upon request, by calling a specified toll-free (or 
collect) telephone number or sending an email to a specified email 
address, if any; (ii) on the Fund's website, if applicable; and (iii) 
on the Commission's website at http://www.sec.gov; and
    b. whenever the Fund (or financial intermediary through which 
shares of the Fund may be purchased or sold) receives a request for the 
Fund's schedule of investments in securities of unaffiliated issuers, 
the Fund (or financial intermediary) sends a copy of Schedule I--
Investments in securities of unaffiliated issuers within 3 business 
days of receipt by first-class mail or other means designed to ensure 
equally prompt delivery.
    8. a. When a Fund (or financial intermediary through which shares 
of the Fund may be purchased or sold) receives a request for a 
description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to 
determine how to vote proxies, the Fund (or financial intermediary) 
must send the information most recently disclosed in response to Item 
18.16 of this Form or Item 7 of Form N-CSR within 3 business days of 
receipt of the request, by first-class mail or other means designed to 
ensure equally prompt delivery.
    b. If a Fund discloses that the Fund's proxy voting record is 
available by calling a toll-free (or collect) telephone number or 
sending an email to a specified email address, if any, and the Fund (or 
financial intermediary through which shares of the Fund may be 
purchased or sold) receives a request for this information, the Fund 
(or financial intermediary) must send the information disclosed in the 
Fund's most recently filed report on Form N-PX, within 3 business days 
of receipt of the request, by first-class mail or other means designed 
to ensure equally prompt delivery.
    c. If a Fund discloses that the Fund's proxy voting record is 
available on or through its website, the Fund must make available free 
of charge the information disclosed in the Fund's most recently filed 
report on Form N-PX on or through its website as soon as reasonably 
practicable after filing the report with the Commission. The 
information disclosed in the Fund's most recently filed report on Form 
N-PX must remain available on or through the Fund's website for as long 
as the Fund remains subject to the requirements of Rule 30b1-4 under 
the Investment Company Act and discloses that the Fund's proxy voting 
record is available on or through its website.
    9. See General Instruction F regarding Incorporation by Reference.
    10. Every annual report filed under the Exchange Act by a business 
development company must contain the information required by 
Instructions 4.b and 4.h, and every periodic report filed under the 
Exchange Act by a business development company must include the 
information required by Instruction 6.i, if applicable.

Part C--Other Information

Item 25. Financial Statements and Exhibits

    List all financial statements and exhibits filed as part of the 
registration statement.
    1. Financial statements.
    Instruction. Identify those financial statements that are included 
in Parts A and B of the registration statement.
    2. Exhibits.
    Subject to General Instruction F regarding incorporation by 
reference and Rule 483 under the Securities Act, file the exhibits 
listed below as part of the registration statement. Letter or number 
the exhibits in the sequence indicated, unless otherwise required by 
Rule 483. Reflect any exhibit incorporated by reference in the list 
below and identify the previously filed document containing the 
incorporated material.
    a. Copies of the charter as now in effect.
    b. Copies of the existing bylaws or instruments corresponding 
thereto.
    c. Copies of any voting trust agreement with respect to more than 
five percent of any class of equity securities of the Fund.
    d. Copies of the constituent instruments defining the rights of the 
holders of the securities.
    e. A copy of the document setting forth the Fund's dividend 
reinvestment plan, if any.
    f. Copies of the constituent instruments defining the rights of the 
holders of long-term debt of all subsidiaries for which consolidated or 
unconsolidated financial statements are required to be filed (The 
instrument relating to any class of long- term debt of the Fund or any 
subsidiary need not be filed if the total amount of securities 
authorized thereunder amounts to less than two percent of the total 
assets of the Fund and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, and if 
the Fund files an agreement to furnish such copies to the Commission 
upon request.).
    g. Copies of all investment advisory contracts relating to the 
management of the assets of the Fund.

[[Page 14549]]

    h. Copies of each underwriting or distribution contract between the 
Fund and a principal underwriter, and specimens or copies of all 
agreements between principal underwriters and dealers.
    i. Copies of all bonus, profit sharing, pension, or other similar 
contracts or arrangements wholly or partly for the benefit of directors 
or officers of the Fund in their capacity as such (a reasonably 
detailed description of any plan that is not set forth in a formal 
document should be furnished).
    j. Copies of all custodian agreements and depository contracts 
entered into in conformance with Section 17(f) of the Investment 
Company Act or rules thereunder with respect to securities and similar 
investments of the Fund, including the schedule of remuneration.
    k. Copies of all other material contracts not made in the ordinary 
course of business that are to be performed in whole or in part at or 
after the date of filing the registration statement.
    l. An opinion of counsel and consent to its use as to the legality 
of the securities being registered, indicating whether they will be 
legally issued, fully paid, and nonassessable.
    m. If a non-resident director, officer, investment adviser, or 
expert named in the registration statement has executed a consent to 
service of process within the United States, a copy of that consent to 
service.
    n. Copies of any other opinions, appraisals, or rulings, and 
consents to their use, relied on in preparing the registration 
statement, and consents to the use of accountants' reports relating to 
audited financial statements required by Section 7 of the Securities 
Act.
    o. All financial statements omitted from Items 8.6 or 24.
    p. Copies of any agreements or understandings made in consideration 
for providing the initial capital between or among the Fund, the 
underwriter, adviser, promoter, or initial stockholders and written 
assurance from the promoters or initial stockholders that their 
purchases were made for investment purposes without any present 
intention of reselling.
    q. Copies of the model plan used in the establishment of any 
retirement plan in conjunction with which the Fund offers its 
securities, any instructions to it, and any other documents making up 
the model plan (such form(s) should disclose the costs and fees charged 
in connection with the plan).
    r. Copies of any codes of ethics adopted under Rule 17j-1 under the 
Investment Company Act and currently applicable to the Fund (i.e., the 
codes of the Fund and its investment advisers and principal 
underwriters). If there are no codes of ethics applicable to the Fund, 
state the reason (e.g., the Fund is a Money Market Fund).
    Instructions.
    1. Subject to the rules on incorporation by reference and 
Instruction 2 below, the foregoing exhibits shall be filed as a part of 
the registration statement. Exhibits required by paragraphs 2.h, 2.l, 
2.n, and 2.o above need to be filed only as part of a Securities Act 
registration statement. Exhibits shall be appropriately lettered or 
numbered for convenient reference. Exhibits incorporated by reference 
may bear the designation given in a previous filing. Where exhibits are 
incorporated by reference, the reference shall be made in the list of 
exhibits. The reference shall include the form, file number and date of 
the previous filing, and the exhibit number (i.e., exhibit 2.a, 2.b, 
etc.) under which the exhibit was previously filed.
    2. A Fund need not file an exhibit as part of a post-effective 
amendment, if the exhibit has been filed in the Fund's initial 
registration statement or in a previous post-effective amendment, 
unless there has been a change in the exhibit, or unless the exhibit is 
a copy of a consent required by Section 7 of the Securities Act or is a 
financial statement omitted from Items 8.6 or 24. The reference to this 
exhibit shall include the number of the previous filing (e.g., pre-
effective amendment No. 1) where such exhibit was filed.
    3. If an exhibit to a registration statement (other than an opinion 
or consent), filed in preliminary form, has been changed (1) only to 
insert information as to interest, dividend or conversion rates, 
redemption or conversion prices, purchase or offering prices, 
underwriters' or dealers' commissions, names, addresses or 
participation of underwriters or similar matters, which information 
appears elsewhere in an amendment to the registration statement or a 
prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act or 
(2) to correct typographical errors, insert signatures or make other 
similar immaterial changes, then, notwithstanding any contrary 
requirement of any rule or form, the Fund need not refile the exhibit 
as so amended. Any incomplete exhibit may not, however, be incorporated 
by reference into any subsequent filing under any Act administered by 
the Commission. If an exhibit required to be executed (e.g., an 
underwriting agreement) is filed in final form, a copy of an executed 
copy shall be filed.

Item 26. Marketing Arrangements

    Briefly describe any arrangements known to the Fund or to any 
person named in response to Item 5, or to any person specified in Item 
19.2, made for any of the following purposes:
    1. To limit or restrict the sale of other securities of the same 
class as those to be offered for the period of distribution;
    2. to stabilize the market for any of the securities to be offered; 
or
    3. to hold each underwriter or dealer responsible for the 
distribution of his or her participation.
    Instruction. If the answer to this Item is contained in an exhibit, 
the Item may be answered by cross-reference to the relevant 
paragraph(s) of the exhibit.

Item 27. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution

    Furnish a reasonably itemized statement of all expenses in 
connection with the issuance and distribution of the securities being 
registered, other than underwriting discounts and commissions. If any 
of the securities being registered are to be offered for the account of 
securityholders, indicate the portion of expenses to be borne by 
securityholders.
    Instruction. Insofar as practicable, separately itemize 
registration fees, federal taxes, state taxes and fees, trustees' and 
transfer agents' fees, costs of printing and engraving, rating agency 
fees, and legal and accounting fees. The information may be given 
subject to future contingencies. Provide estimates if the amounts of 
any items are not known.

Item 28. Persons Controlled by or Under Common Control

    Furnish a list or diagram of all persons directly or indirectly 
controlled by, or under common control with, the Fund, and as to each 
of these persons indicate (1) if a company, the state or other 
jurisdiction under whose laws it is organized, and (2) the percentage 
of voting securities owned or other basis of control by the person, if 
any, immediately controlling it.
    Instructions.
    1. The list or diagram shall include the Fund and shall show 
clearly the relationship of each company named to the Fund and to other 
companies named. If the company is controlled by the direct ownership 
of its securities by two or more persons, so indicate by appropriate 
cross-reference.
    2. Identify, by appropriate symbols: (1) Subsidiaries for which 
separate financial statements are filed; (2) subsidiaries included in 
the respective consolidated financial statements; (3)

[[Page 14550]]

subsidiaries included in the respective group financial statements 
filed for unconsolidated subsidiaries; and (4) other subsidiaries, 
indicating briefly why statements of these subsidiaries are not filed.

Item 29. Number of Holders of Securities

    State in substantially the tabular form indicated, as of a 
specified date within 90 days prior to the date of filing, the number 
of record holders of each class of securities of the Fund.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    (1)                                  (2)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Title of Class                  Number of Record Holders
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Item 30. Indemnification

    State the general effect of any contract, arrangement, or statute 
under which any director, officer, underwriter, or affiliated person of 
the Fund is insured or indemnified in any manner against any liability 
that may be incurred in such capacity, other than insurance provided by 
any member of the board of directors, officer, underwriter, or 
affiliated person for his or her own protection.
    Instruction. In responding to this Item, the Fund should note the 
requirements of Rules 461(c) and 484 under the Securities Act and 
Section 17 of the Investment Company Act. (See Investment Company Act 
Rel. No. 11330 (Sept. 4, 1980) [45 FR 62423 (Sept. 19, 1980)] and 
Investment Company Act Rel. No. 7221 (June 9, 1972) [37 FR 12790 (June 
29, 1972)].)

Item 31. Business and Other Connections of Investment Adviser

    Describe briefly any other business, profession, vocation, or 
employment of a substantial nature in which each investment adviser of 
the Fund, and each director, executive officer, or partner of any such 
investment adviser, is or has been, at any time during the past two 
fiscal years, engaged for his or her own account or in the capacity of 
director, officer, employee, partner, or trustee.
    Instructions.
    1. State the name and principal business address of any company 
with which any person specified above is connected in the capacity of 
director, officer, employee, partner, or trustee and the nature of the 
connection.
    2. The names of investment advisory clients need not be provided.
    3. For purposes of this Item, the term ``executive officer'' means 
the investment adviser's president, any other officer who performs a 
policy-making function for the investment adviser in connection with 
its management of the closed-end fund, or any other person who performs 
a similar policy-making function for the investment adviser. Executive 
officers of subsidiaries of the investment adviser may be deemed 
executive officers of the investment adviser, if they perform such 
policy-making functions for the investment adviser.

Item 32. Location of Accounts and Records

    Furnish the name and address of each person maintaining physical 
possession of each account, book, or other document required to be 
maintained by Section 31(a) of the Investment Company Act and the rules 
thereunder.
    Instruction. The Fund may omit this information to the extent it is 
provided in its most recent report on Form N-CEN.

Item 33. Management Services

    Furnish a summary of the substantive provisions of any management-
related service contract not discussed in Part A or B of the 
registration statement (because the contract was not believed to be of 
interest to a purchaser of the Fund's securities), indicating the 
parties to the contract, the total dollars paid, and by whom, for the 
last three fiscal years.
    Instructions.
    1. The instructions to Item 20.4 of this Form shall also apply to 
this Item.
    2. Information need not be provided for any service for which total 
payments of less than $5,000 were made during each of the last three 
fiscal years.

Item 34. Undertakings

    Furnish the following undertakings in substantially the following 
form in all registration statements filed under the Securities Act, as 
applicable:
    1. An undertaking to suspend the offering of shares until the 
prospectus is amended if (1) subsequent to the effective date of its 
registration statement, the net asset value declines more than ten 
percent from its net asset value as of the effective date of the 
registration statement or (2) the net asset value increases to an 
amount greater than its net proceeds as stated in the prospectus.
    2. An undertaking to file a post-effective amendment with certified 
financial statements showing the initial capital received before 
accepting subscriptions from more than 25 persons, if the Fund proposes 
to raise its initial capital under Section 14(a)(3) of the Investment 
Company Act.
    3. If the securities being registered are to be offered to existing 
shareholders pursuant to warrants or rights, and any securities not 
taken by shareholders are to be reoffered to the public, an undertaking 
to supplement the prospectus, after the expiration of the subscription 
period, to set forth the results of the subscription offer, the 
transactions by underwriters during the subscription period, the amount 
of unsubscribed securities to be purchased by underwriters, and the 
terms of any subsequent reoffering thereof. If any public offering by 
the underwriters of the securities being registered is to be made on 
terms differing from those set forth on the cover page of the 
prospectus, the Fund shall undertake to file a post-effective amendment 
to set forth the terms of such offering.
    4. If the securities are being registered in reliance on Rule 415 
under the Securities Act, an undertaking:
    a. To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being 
made, a post-effective amendment to the registration statement:
    (1) To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the 
Securities Act;
    (2) to reflect in the prospectus any facts or events after the 
effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-
effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, 
represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the 
registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or 
decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of 
securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any 
deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering 
range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the 
Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in 
volume and price represent no more than 20% change in the maximum 
aggregate offering price set forth in the ``Calculation of Registration 
Fee'' table in the effective registration statement.
    (3) to include any material information with respect to the plan of 
distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or 
any material change to such information in the registration statement.
    Provided, however, that paragraphs a(1), a(2), and a(3) of this 
section do not apply if the registration statement is filed pursuant to 
General Instruction A.2 of this Form and the information required to be 
included in a post-effective amendment by those paragraphs is contained 
in reports filed

[[Page 14551]]

with or furnished to the Commission by the Fund pursuant to Section 13 
or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act that are incorporated by reference 
into the registration statement, or is contained in a form of 
prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) that is part of the 
registration statement.
    b. that, for the purpose of determining any liability under the 
Securities Act, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to 
be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered 
therein, and the offering of those securities at that time shall be 
deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof;
    c. to remove from registration by means of a post-effective 
amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at 
the termination of the offering;
    d. that, for the purpose of determining liability under the 
Securities Act to any purchaser:
    (1) If the Fund is relying on Rule 430B:
    (A) Each prospectus filed by the Fund pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) 
shall be deemed to be part of the registration statement as of the date 
the filed prospectus was deemed part of and included in the 
registration statement; and
    (B) Each prospectus required to be filed pursuant to Rule 
424(b)(2), (b)(5), or (b)(7) as part of a registration statement in 
reliance on Rule 430B relating to an offering made pursuant to Rule 
415(a)(1)(i), (x), or (xi) for the purpose of providing the information 
required by Section 10(a) of the Securities Act shall be deemed to be 
part of and included in the registration statement as of the earlier of 
the date such form of prospectus is first used after effectiveness or 
the date of the first contract of sale of securities in the offering 
described in the prospectus. As provided in Rule 430B, for liability 
purposes of the issuer and any person that is at that date an 
underwriter, such date shall be deemed to be a new effective date of 
the registration statement relating to the securities in the 
registration statement to which that prospectus relates, and the 
offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the 
initial bona fide offering thereof. Provided, however, that no 
statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part 
of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or 
deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or 
prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a 
purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such effective date, 
supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration 
statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or 
made in any such document immediately prior to such effective date; or
    (2) if the Fund is subject to Rule 430C: Each prospectus filed 
pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act as part of a 
registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration 
statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in 
reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in 
the registration statement as of the date it is first used after 
effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a 
registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration 
statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by 
reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of 
the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of 
contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any 
statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus 
that was part of the registration statement or made in any such 
document immediately prior to such date of first use.
    e. that for the purpose of determining liability of the Fund under 
the Securities Act to any purchaser in the initial distribution of 
securities:
    The undersigned Fund undertakes that in a primary offering of 
securities of the undersigned Fund pursuant to this registration 
statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the 
securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to 
such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the 
undersigned Fund will be a seller to the purchaser and will be 
considered to offer or sell such securities to the purchaser:
    (1) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned 
Fund relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rules 
424under the Securities Act;
    (2) free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or 
on behalf of the undersigned Fund or used or referred to by the 
undersigned Funds;
    (3) the portion of any other free writing prospectus or 
advertisement pursuant to Rule 482 under the Securities Act relating to 
the offering containing material information about the undersigned Fund 
or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned Fund; and
    (4) any other communication that is an offer in the offering made 
by the undersigned Fund to the purchaser.
    5. If the Fund is filing a registration statement permitted by Rule 
430A under the Securities Act, an undertaking that:
    a. For the purpose of determining any liability under the 
Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of prospectus 
filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A 
and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the Fund under Rule 
424(b)(1) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this 
registration statement as of the time it was declared effective; and
    b. for the purpose of determining any liability under the 
Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of 
prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating 
to the securities offered therein, and the offering of the securities 
at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering 
thereof.
    6. Filings Incorporating Subsequent Exchange Act Documents by 
Reference. Include the following if the registration statement 
incorporates by reference any Exchange Act document filed subsequent to 
the effective date of the registration statement:
    The undersigned Fund hereby undertakes that, for purposes of 
determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each filing 
of the Fund's annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) 
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that is incorporated by 
reference into the registration statement shall be deemed to be a new 
registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and 
the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the 
initial bona fide offering thereof.
    7. Request for acceleration of effective date or filing of 
registration statement becoming effective upon filing. Include the 
following if acceleration is requested of the effective date of the 
registration statement pursuant to Rule 461 under the Securities Act, 
or if a registration statement filed pursuant to General Instruction 
A.2 of this Form will become effective upon filing with the Commission 
pursuant to Rule 462(e) or (f) under the Securities Act, and:
    a. Any provision or arrangement exists whereby the Fund may 
indemnify a director, officer or controlling person of the Fund against 
liabilities arising under the Securities Act, or
    b. The underwriting agreement contains a provision whereby the Fund 
indemnifies the underwriter or controlling persons of the underwriter 
against such liabilities and a director, officer or controlling person 
of the Fund is such an underwriter or controlling

[[Page 14552]]

person thereof or a member of any firm which is such an underwriter, 
and
    c. The benefits of such indemnification are not waived by such 
persons:
    Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the 
Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and 
controlling persons of the Fund pursuant to the foregoing provisions, 
or otherwise, the Fund has been advised that in the opinion of the 
Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against 
public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. 
In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities 
(other than the payment by the Fund of expenses incurred or paid by a 
director, officer or controlling person of the Fund in the successful 
defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such 
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the 
securities being registered, the Fund will, unless in the opinion of 
its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, 
submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such 
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act 
and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
    8. An undertaking to send by first class mail or other means 
designed to ensure equally prompt delivery, within two business days of 
receipt of a written or oral request, any prospectus or Statement of 
Additional Information.

Signatures

    Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and/or 
the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this 
registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, 
thereunto duly authorized, in the City of______, and State of____, on 
the ____ day of ______.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Registrant

By---------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signature

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Title

    Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this 
registration statement has been signed by the following person in the 
capacities and on the dates indicated.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signature
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Title

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date

    40. Amend Form 24F-2 (referenced in Sec.  274.24 of this chapter) 
by:
    a. Revising the first sentence of paragraph A.1. of the 
``INSTRUCTIONS'' section; and
    b. Revising the first sentence of paragraph A.3. of the 
``INSTRUCTIONS'' section.
    The revisions read as follows:

    Note:  The text of Form 24F-2 does not, and these amendments 
will not, appear in the Code of Federal Regulations.

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 24F-2

Annual Filing Under Rule 24f 2 of the Investment Company Act of 1940

INSTRUCTIONS

    A. * * *
    1. This Form should be used by an open-end management investment 
company, closed-end management company that makes periodic repurchase 
offers pursuant to Sec.  270.23c-3(b) of this chapter, face amount 
certificate company, or unit investment trust (``issuer'') for annual 
filings required by rule 24f-2 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 
[15 U.S.C. 80a] (``Investment Company Act''). * * *
* * * * *
    3. Pursuant to rule 101(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-T [17 CFR 
232.101(a)(1)(iv)] this Form must be submitted in electronic format 
using the Commission's Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and 
Retrieval (``EDGAR'') system. * * *
* * * * *

    By the Commission.

    Dated: March 20, 2019.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-05776 Filed 4-9-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P