Document ID: EPA-HQ-OECA-2004-0019-0009
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2004-11-15T05:00Z

Table
2.
Annual
Agency
Burden
and
Cost
NESHAP
for
Pulp
and
Paper
Production
(
40
CFR
Part
63,
Subpart
S)
(
A)
(
B)
(
C)
(
D)
(
E)
(
F)

Number
of
EPA
Tech
Management
Clerical
EPA
Respondents
Hours
Hours
Hours
Hours
Cost
Per
Year
(
a)
Per
Per
Year
Per
Year
Per
Year
Per
Year
Respondent
@
$
40.56
@
$
54.66
@
$
21.95
Burden
Item
(
C=
AxB)
(
D=
Cx0.05)
(
E=
Cx0.1)

1.
Applications
2.
Surveys
and
Studies
3.
Reporting
Requirements
A.
Read
and
Understand
Rule
Requirements
7
b
6
42
2
4
$
1,910
B.
Required
Activities
Initial
performance
tests:

1.1)
Pulping
processes
(
Non­
Sulfite)
­
Choice
of:

a)
Review
Documentation
that
vent
streams
are
introduced
to
4
b,
c
8
32
2
3
$
1,456
the
flame
zone
of
a
boiler,
lime
kiln,
or
recovery
furnace,
or
b)
Review
documentation
that
the
control
incinerator
is
operating
1
b,
d
8
8
0
1
$
364
at
a
level
of
at
least
1600
F
and
0.75
sec
residence
time,
or
c)
Review
performance
test
of
control
device
1
b,
d
8
8
0
1
$
364
1.2)
Pulping
Processes
(
Sulfite)
0
b,
e
8
0
0
0
$
0
­
Revew
performance
test
of
control
device
2.1)
Bleaching
process
vent
scrubber
(
MACT
I
Mills)
­
Choice
of
a)
Review
documentation
of
scrubber
operating
parameters
4
b,
g
8
32
2
3
$
1,456
b)
Review
performance
test
of
control
device
0
b,
f
8
0
0
0
$
0
2.2)
Bleaching
process
vent
scrubber
(
MACT
III
Mills)
­
Choice
of
a)
Review
documentation
of
scrubber
operating
parameters
0
b,
g
8
0
0
0
$
0
b)
Review
performance
test
of
control
device
0
b,
f
8
0
1
0
$
55
3.1)
Pulping
wastewater
treatment
system
(
Non­
Sulfite)
­
Choice
of:

a)
Review
performance
test
of
condensate
segregation
and
4
b,
g
8
32
2
3
$
1,456
control
device,
or
b)
Review
performance
test
of
biotreatment
unit
2
b,
g
8
16
1
2
$
728
3.2)
Pulping
wastewater
treatment
(
Sulfite)

­
Review
performance
test
of
control
device
0
b,
g,
h
8
0
0
0
$
0
Review
repeat
performance
tests
1)
test
method
308
­
pulping
0
b,
i
4
0
0
0
$
0
2)
test
method
26A
­
bleaching
0
b,
i
4
0
1
1
$
77
3)
test
method
305
­
kraft
pulping
wastewater
1
b,
i
4
4
0
0
$
182
4)
test
method
304
­
kraft
pulping
wastewater
0
b,
i
4
0
0
0
$
0
5)
test
method
305
­
sulfite
pulping
wastewater
0
b,
i
4
0
1
0
$
55
Initial/
Annual
inspection
(
enclosures,
closed
vent,
87
j
0
0
0
0
$
0
wastewater
conveyance
system)
­
test
method
21
Monthly
visual
inspection
of
enclosures,
closed
130
k
0
0
0
0
$
0
vent
system,
and
wastewater
conveyance
system.

C.
Create
Information
D.
Gather
Information
E.
Report
Preparation
Review
Initial
Notification
Report
0
b,
k
4
0
0
0
$
0
Review
Notification
of
compliance
status
0
b,
k
4
0
0
0
$
0
Review
initial
compliance
strategy
report
0
b,
l
4
0
0
0
$
0
Review
compliance
strategy
report
update
27
l
4
108
5
11
$
4,913
Review
Semi­
annual
summary
report
137
k
2
274
14
27
$
12,464
Review
Continuous
monitoring/
Exceedance
reports
21
m
8
168
8
17
$
7,642
Review
Notification
of
performance
test
24
b,
n
8
192
10
19
$
8,734
Review
Notification
of
construction/
reconstruction
21
b,
o
4
84
4
8
$
3,821
Review
Notification
of
actual
startup
21
b,
o
4
84
1
1
$
3,484
4.
Recordkeeping
Requirements
A.
Read
Instructions
B.
Plan
Activities
C.
Implement
Activities
D.
Develop
Record
System
0
b,
k
0
0
0
0
$
0
E.
Record
information
Records
of
monitoring
parameters
137
k
0
0
0
0
$
0
Records
of
periodic
inspections
(
monthly
visual
inspections
and
annual
method
21)

Record
startups,
shutdowns,
and
malfunctions
137
k
0
0
0
0
$
0
F.
Personnel
Training
137
k
0
0
0
0
$
0
G.
Time
for
audits
137
k
0
0
0
0
$
0
Total:
1084
54
102
$
49,158
TOTAL
FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT
BURDEN
SUMMARY:

Total
hours
per
year
1,240
Annual
costs
in
dollars
$
49,158
Footnotes
a
Values
are
rounded
to
simplify
calculations.

b
One­
time
activity.
After
initial
compliance
date,
assume
that
5%
of
mills
affected
as
a
result
of
unexplained
exceedances.

c
Estimated
that
66.7%
of
mills
will
use
a
recovery
boiler,
power
boiler,
or
lime
kiln
for
pulping
lines.
There
are
122
non­
sulfite
pulping
mills.
(
66.7%
of
122
=
81).

d
Estimated
that
33.3%
of
mills
will
use
incineration
for
pulping
lines
(
16.7%
will
provide
accepatble
design
specs
(
14),
and
16.7%
will
conduct
performance
tests
(
14)
).

e
Assume
that
all
of
the
8
sulfite
pulping
mills
will
conduct
performance
tests.

f
94
MACT
I
category
mills
have
bleaching
lines.
90%
will
provide
acceptable
performance
specs
(
85),
10%
will
conduct
performance
tests
(
9).

Assume
2
percent
of
stand­
alone
MACT
III
category
mills
have
bleaching
lines
(
2%
of
338=
7).
90%
will
provide
performance
specs
of
previous
test
results
(
6).

10%
will
conduct
performance
tests
(
1).

g
Estimated
that
each
kraft
mill
has
one
pulping
wastewater
control
device.
Of
the
108
kraft
mills,
28
already
have
steam
strippers
in
use,

and
of
the
28,
all
are
assumed
to
conduct
condensate
segregation
and
performance
tests.
Of
the
80
mills
without
control,
35
will
use
biotreatment
control,
and
45
will
install
steam
strippers.

Facilities
installing
new
biotreatment
control
will
perform
initial
performance
tests.

h
Estimated
that
each
kraft
mill
has
one
pulping
wastewater
control
device.
Assumed
33%
will
use
biotreatment.
(
33%
of
108
=
36).

i
Assumed
that
15%
of
performance
tests
are
failed
and
need
to
be
repeated.

j
Initial
and
annual
activity
by
all
affected
mills.
Assumed
that
EPA
is
notified
each
year
of
the
testing.
Assumed
2/
3
of
all
MACT
I
mills
have
positive
pressure
points
in
their
vent
systems.

k
Performed
by
all
affected
mills.
(
137)

l
Performed
by
all
kraft
mills.
(
108)

m
Assumed
that
15%
of
all
mills
during
any
one
quarter
will
be
required
to
submit
an
exceedance
report
in
addition
to
the
summary
report.
(
15%
of
137
=
21)

n
EPA
must
be
notified
of
all
tests
including
repeat
performance
tests.
(
130
x
.05
=
7)
(
7
x
1.15
x
3
=
24)

o
Assumed
15%
of
mills
conduct
construction
or
reconstruction
per
year.
(
15%
of
130
=
21)