Document ID: SEC-2013-0359-0001
Agency: sec
Document Type: Notice
Title: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes: NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
Posted Date: 2013-02-20T05:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 34 (Wednesday, February 20, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11916-11921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03821]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-68924; File No. SR-Phlx-2013-13]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to 
its Customer Rebate Program and Other Technical Amendments

February 13, 2013.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that, on February 1, 2013, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange's Pricing Schedule at 
Section A, entitled ``Customer Rebate Program.'' The Exchange also 
proposes technical amendments to the Preface, Section I, entitled 
``Rebates and Fees for Adding and Removing Liquidity in Select 
Symbols,'' Section II, entitled ``Multiply

[[Page 11917]]

Listed Options Fees'' \3\ and Section IV entitled ``PIXL \4\ Pricing'' 
of the Pricing Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Multiply Listed Options Fees include options overlying 
equities, ETFs, ETNs and indexes which are Multiply Listed.
    \4\ PIXL is the Exchange's price improvement mechanism known as 
Price Improvement XL or (PIXL\SM\). See Rule 1080(n).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5. The 
text of the proposed rule change is also available on the Exchange's 
Web site at http://nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal 
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the Customer 
Rebate Program to incentivize market participants to increase the 
amount of Customer order flow they transact on the Exchange. The 
Exchange also proposes to amend and add certain rule text in the 
Pricing Schedule to provide additional clarity to the Pricing Schedule.
Customer Rebate Program
    Currently, the Exchange pays Customer Rebates by calculating an 
Average Daily Volume Threshold. The Exchange calculates the Average 
Daily Volume Threshold by totaling Customer volume in Multiply Listed 
Options (including Select Symbols) that are electronically-delivered 
and executed, except volume associated with electronic QCC Orders, as 
defined in Exchange Rule 1080(o) (``Threshold Volume''). Rebates are 
paid on Threshold Volume.
    The Exchange is proposing to base the Customer Rebate Program on 
certain ``Rebate Tiers.'' The Exchange proposes to replace the current 
three tier structure, which pays rebates based on the number of 
contracts transacted in a month based on four Categories (A, B, C and 
D) of transactions, with a four tier structure. The four tier structure 
would pay rebates based on percentage thresholds of national customer 
multiply-listed options volume by month based on the same four 
Categories (A, B, C and D) of transactions. Specifically, the Exchange 
would base a market participant's qualification for a certain Rebate 
Tier on the percentage of total national customer volume in multiply-
listed options which are transacted monthly on Phlx. The Exchange 
proposes to establish a four tier Customer rebate structure with a 
column entitled ``Percentage Thresholds of National Customer Volume in 
Multiply-Listed Options Classes (Monthly).'' The Exchange proposes the 
following Customer Rebate Tiers by percentages:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Percentage thresholds of
                                    national customer volume
       Customer rebate tiers           in multiply-listed      Category A   Category B   Category C   Category D
                                         options classes
                                            (monthly)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tier 1............................  0.00%-0.75%.............        $0.00        $0.00        $0.00        $0.00
Tier 2............................  Above 0.75%-1.60%.......         0.11         0.12         0.13         0.08
Tier 3............................  Above 1.60%-2.60%.......         0.13         0.13         0.14         0.08
Tier 4............................  Above 2.60%.............         0.15         0.15         0.15         0.09
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that replacing the current tiers which 
require market participants to qualify for Customer Rebates based on a 
certain number contracts transacted in a month with a tier structure 
based on relative contracts per month as a percentage of total national 
customer volume in multiply-listed options transacted on Phlx would 
serve to control and account for industry-wide movements.
    The Exchange is not proposing to amend the criteria to qualify for 
a certain rebate Category (A, B, C or D). These will remain the same 
pursuant to this proposal.\5\ In addition, the Exchange would continue 
to total Customer volume in Multiply Listed Options (including Select 
Symbols) that are electronically-delivered and executed, except volume 
associated with electronic QCC Orders, as defined in Exchange Rule 
1080(o) in the same manner.\6\ The Exchange proposes to remove 
references to the Average Daily Volume Threshold and replace those 
references with Customer Rebate Tier references. The Exchange also 
proposes to permit members and member organizations under common 
ownership to aggregate their volume for purposes of calculating the 
Customer Rebate Tiers and receiving rebates. Common ownership, which 
the Exchange is proposing to define in the Preface to the Pricing 
Schedule as described in more detail below, shall mean 75% common 
ownership or control.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Category A rebates are paid to members executing 
electronically-delivered Customer Simple Orders in Penny Pilot 
Options and Customer Simple Orders in Non-Penny Pilot Options in 
Section II. Rebates are paid on PIXL Orders in Section II symbols 
that execute against non-Initiating Order interest. Category B 
rebates are paid to members executing electronically-delivered 
Customer Complex Orders in Penny Pilot Options and Non-Penny Pilot 
Options in Section II. Category C rebates are paid to members 
executing electronically-delivered Customer Complex Orders in Select 
Symbols in Section I. Category D rebates will be paid to members 
executing electronically-delivered Customer Simple Orders in Select 
Symbols in Section I. Rebates are paid on PIXL Orders in Section I 
symbols that execute against non-Initiating Order interest.
    \6\ For clarity, the Exchange will calculate volume and pay 
rebates based on a member organization's Phlx house account numbers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is proposing to amend the rebates paid to market 
participants with this proposal. Currently, Categories A, B, C and D 
receive no rebate for volume between 0 to 99,999 contracts in a month. 
The Exchange proposes to pay Categories A, B, C and D no rebate with 
proposed Tier 1 which is between 0.00% to 0.75% of national customer 
volume in multiply-listed options classes. Currently, the Exchange pays 
the following rebates for Tier 2 volume which is between 100,000 and 
349,999 contracts in a month: Category A: $0.10, Category B: $0.12, 
Category C: $0.13 and Category D: $0.05. The Exchange would pay the 
following rebates for new Tier 2 for a percentage of national customer 
volume in multiply-listed options

[[Page 11918]]

classes above 0.75% to 1.60%: Category A: $0.11, Category B: $0.12, 
Category C: $0.13 and Category D: $0.08. Currently, the Exchange pays 
the following rebates for Tier 3 volume which is over 350,000 contracts 
in a month: Category A: $0.15, Category B: $0.15, Category C: $0.15 and 
Category D: $0.07. The Exchange would pay the following rebates for new 
Tier 3 for a percentage of national customer volume in multiply-listed 
options classes above 1.60% to 2.60%: Category A: $0.13, Category B: 
$0.13, Category C: $0.14 and Category D: $0.08. The Exchange would pay 
the following rebates for new Tier 4 for a percentage of national 
customer volume in multiply-listed options classes above 2.60%: 
Category A: $0.15, Category B: $0.15, Category C: $0.15 and Category D: 
$0.09. By way of example, a market participant that executes 3,000,000 
electronically-delivered Customer Simple Order contracts in Select 
Symbols, which are Multiply Listed Options, in a given month where 
150,000,000 national customer multiply-listed options contracts were 
executed would receive a credit of $240,000. The market participant 
would have qualified for this rebate because the number of qualifying 
contracts \7\ executed on Phlx represents 2% of the total national 
customer multiply-listed options volume and because the Customers 
orders were Simple Orders in Select Symbols, the Category D rate in 
Tier 3 of $0.08 per contract would be applied to the 3,000,000 Customer 
contracts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Presuming the contracts are not electronic QCC Orders as 
defined in Rule 1080(o).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, today, member organizations qualifying for either a Tier 2 
or Tier 3 rebate are entitled to receive a credit of $0.04 per contract 
toward the Routing Fee specified in Section V of the Pricing Schedule 
if a Customer order is routed to NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (``BX Options'') 
or the NASDAQ Options Market (``NOM''). Today, a member organization 
qualifying for either a Tier 2 or Tier 3 rebate is entitled to receive 
a credit of $0.10 per contract toward the Routing Fee specified in 
Section V of the Pricing Schedule if the Customer order is routed to an 
away market other than BX Options or NOM.
    The Exchange proposes to amend the qualifying tiers from Tier 2 or 
3 to Tiers 2, 3 or 4 to receive credits to the various away markets. 
The Exchange also proposes to amend the credit that will be paid per 
contract to $0.10 per contract toward the Routing Fee specified in 
Section V of the Pricing Schedule if a Customer order is routed to NOM 
and $0.05 per contract credit toward the Routing Fee specified in 
Section V of the Pricing Schedule if a Customer order is routed to BX 
Options. A member organization qualifying for a Tier 2, 3 or 4 rebate 
is entitled to a credit of $0.16 per contract toward the Routing Fee 
specified in Section V of the Pricing Schedule if the Customer order is 
routed to an away market other than BX Options or NOM, unless the away 
market transaction fee is $0.00 or a rebate is paid by the away market, 
in which case the credit would be reduced to $0.11 per contract. The 
Exchange believes that offering credits toward Routing Fees will 
continue to incentivize market participants to transact a greater 
number of Customer orders on the Exchange.
Technical Amendments
    First, the Exchange utilizes the term ``common ownership'' 
throughout the Pricing Schedule and defines common ownership as 75% 
common ownership or control among members and member organizations.\8\ 
The Exchange proposes to amend the Preface of the Pricing Schedule to 
define ``Common Ownership'' for purposes of pricing. The Exchange also 
proposes to revise Sections II, IV and VI of the Pricing Schedule to 
simply refer to the defined term ``Common Ownership'' and eliminate the 
definitions throughout the rule text which reflect the same 75% common 
ownership or control language.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Sections II, IV and VI of the Pricing Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Second, the Exchange proposes to amend Section I of the Pricing 
Schedule to add the words ``Complex Order'' prior to the language 
discussing the Pilot Program related to the $0.05 per contract fee 
differential for Fees for Removing Liquidity for Specialists and Market 
Makers that transact against a Customer order directed to them. The 
Exchange received approval for a Pilot Program which commenced on 
December 1, 2012.\9\ The Exchange believes the addition of the words 
``Complex Order'' further clarifies the Pricing Schedule. The fee 
differential for directed orders applies to Complex Orders and does not 
apply to Simple Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Securities Exchange Release No. 66884 (April 30, 2012), 
77 FR 26595 (May 4, 2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-27and SR-Phlx-2012-54). See 
also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68376 (December 6, 2012), 
77 FR 74039 (December 12, 2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-139).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Third, the Exchange proposes to amend the Section II Monthly Market 
Maker Cap rule text to specify that the Monthly Market Maker Cap 
applies to electronic and floor transactions. The Exchange proposes to 
remove the word ``equity'' from this paragraph as that word is not 
necessary. Also, the Exchange proposes to refer to Options Transaction 
Charges instead of ``fees'' in that same paragraph for consistency.
    Fourth, the Exchange proposes to remove the rule text describing 
the common ownership in Section IV because the Exchange has proposed 
herein to permit members and member organization under common ownership 
to aggregate Customer Rebate volume in Section A. The Exchange proposes 
to include rule text to permit any member or member organization under 
common ownership with another member or member organization that 
qualifies for a Customer Rebate Tier discount in Section A to receive 
the discounted PIXL Initiating Order discount as proposed herein. For 
example, if Phlx member A qualifies for a Tier 5 [sic] Customer Rebate 
pursuant to Section A of the Pricing Schedule, Phlx member B, an 
affiliate of member A and 75% commonly owned by the same parent, would 
be entitled to the discounted Initiating Order Fee of $0.05 per 
contract. The Exchange would utilize the proposed defined term ``Common 
Ownership'' in this section.
    Fifth, the Exchange proposes to clarify in Section IV of the 
Pricing Schedule that with respect to PIXL Order executions in Section 
I Select Symbols,\10\ the pricing specified in Section IV is in 
addition to other fees and rebates in Section I, including Payment for 
Order Flow fees where appropriate. The Exchange makes a similar 
statement in Section IV, Part A with respect to Section II PIXL fees 
and proposes this additional language for consistency and clarity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Select Symbols are defined in Section I of the Pricing 
Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Pricing 
Schedule is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \11\ in general, 
and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \12\ in 
particular, in that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable fees 
and other charges among Exchange members and other persons using its 
facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Customer Rebate Program
    The Exchange's proposal to convert the qualification for the rebate 
tiers from measuring a market participant's per month Average Daily 
Contract Volume to relative contracts per month based on national 
customer volume in multiply-listed options classes executed on Phlx

[[Page 11919]]

is reasonable because it allows the Exchange to control and account for 
changes in the national industry-wide customer multiply-listed options 
volume. Further, it will still allow market participants to receive 
rebates on Customer volume in Multiply Listed Options (including Select 
Symbols) that are electronically-delivered and executed, except volume 
associated with electronic QCC Orders, as is the case today. The 
Exchange believes that the amended Customer Rebate Program should 
incentivize market participants to increase the amount of Customer 
orders that are transacted on the Exchange to obtain a rebate. In 
addition, other exchanges employ similar incentive programs.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated's 
(``CBOE'') Fees Schedule. CBOE offers each Trading Permit Holder 
(``TPH'') a credit for each public customer order transmitted by the 
TPH which is executed electronically in all multiply-listed option 
classes, excluding QCC trades and executions related to contracts 
that are routed to one or more exchanges in connection with the 
Options Order Protection and Locked/Crossed Market Plan, provided 
the TPH meets certain percentage thresholds in a month as described 
in the Volume Incentive Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange's proposal to convert the qualification for the rebate 
tiers from measuring a market participant's per month Average Daily 
Contract Volume to relative contracts per month based on national 
customer volume in multiply-listed options classes executed on Phlx is 
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it will be applied to 
all market participants in a uniform matter. Any market participant is 
eligible to receive the rebate provided they transact a qualifying 
amount of electronic Customer volume. The Exchange is merely amending 
the measuring stick that it utilized to determine the amount of 
qualifying volume. The Exchange would account for changes in industry-
wide volume with the amendment.
    The Exchange believes that amending the rebates offered in 
Categories A, B, C and D is reasonable because with respect to Tier 1, 
the Exchange would continue to not offer a rebate to market 
participants. The Exchange is also adding several new tiers which allow 
market participants the opportunity to achieve higher rebates in 
Category A and substantially the same and higher rebates in Categories 
B, C and D. With respect to Tiers 2, 3, and 4, the Exchange believes 
that it is providing market participants the opportunity to earn higher 
rebates. Proposed Tier 2 rebates are the same or higher than the Tier 2 
rebates today. Proposed Tier 3 rebates are slightly lower than the 
current Tier 3 rebates. Proposed Tier 4 rebates are the same or higher 
than the current Tier 3 rebates, which today are the highest rebates 
that a market participant can achieve under the program. The Exchange 
is unable to specify with certainty which tier would apply to 
participants that are executing a certain amount of Customer volume 
today. The Exchange believes that the rebates proposed herein are 
reasonable because market participants may be able to obtain higher 
rebates beyond Tier 1 if they are able to qualify for a higher tier as 
compared to today's tiers with the proposed method of percentages of 
national customer volume.
    The Exchange believes that amending the rebates offered in 
Categories A, B, C and D is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory 
because the rebates will be applied to all market participants in a 
uniform matter. Any market participant is eligible to receive the 
rebate provided they transact a qualifying amount of electronic 
Customer volume.
    The Exchange believes that permitting members and member 
organizations to aggregate their volume if they are under common 
ownership, defined as 75% common ownership or control, is reasonable 
because the Exchange desires to provide all market participants the 
ability to obtain Customer Rebates. The Exchange believes that 
permitting members and member organizations to aggregate their volume 
if they are under common ownership is equitable and not unfairly 
discriminatory because the Exchange would permit all market 
participants the ability to aggregate for purposes of receiving the 
Customer Rebate even if certain members and member organizations chose 
to operate under separate entities. The Exchange currently permits such 
aggregation in the calculation of the Monthly Market Maker Cap and for 
purposes of PIXL fees.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Section II of the Pricing Schedule. Specialists and 
Market Makers are subject to a ``Monthly Market Maker Cap'' of 
$550,000 for: (i) Equity option transaction fees; (ii) QCC 
Transaction Fees (as defined in Exchange Rule 1080(o) and Floor QCC 
Orders, as defined in 1064(e)); and (iii) fees related to an order 
or quote that is contra to a PIXL Order or specifically responding 
to a PIXL auction. The trading activity of separate Specialist and 
Market Maker member organizations will be aggregated in calculating 
the Monthly Market Maker Cap if there is at least 75% common 
ownership between the member organizations. See also Section IV of 
the Pricing Schedule. For purposes of the PIXL Initiating Order 
members and member organizations under common ownership may 
aggregate their Customer Rebate Program volume.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange's proposal to further reduce Routing Fees \15\ in 
Section V of the Exchange's Pricing Schedule for member organizations 
that qualify for Tiers 2, 3 or 4 in the Customer Rebate Program in 
Section A of the Pricing Schedule is reasonable because the Exchange 
proposes to provide an additional incentive for transacting Customer 
orders on the Exchange. By offering member organizations a credit 
toward the cost of routing to an away market, the Exchange is seeking 
to encourage market participants to transact a greater number of 
Customer orders on Phlx which liquidity benefits all market 
participants. In addition, the Exchange is offering the credit toward 
Customer Routing Fees in addition to the Customer rebate received for 
the qualifying Customer Rebate Tier.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Each destination market's transaction charge varies and 
there is a cost incurred by the Exchange when routing orders to away 
markets. The costs to the Exchange include clearing costs, 
administrative and technical costs associated with operating NOS 
that are assessed on the Exchange, membership fees at away markets, 
and technical costs associated with routing options. The Routing 
Fees enable the Exchange to recover the costs it incurs to route 
orders to away markets in addition to transaction fees assessed to 
market participants for the execution of orders by the away market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that providing a credit of $0.10 per contract 
toward the Customer Routing Fee specified in Section V of the Pricing 
Schedule if a Customer order is routed to NOM and a $0.05 per contract 
credit toward the Customer Routing Fee specified in Section V of the 
Pricing Schedule if a Customer order is routed to BX Options is 
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because NOM does not pay a 
Customer Rebate to Remove Liquidity and BX Options pays a Rebate to 
Remove Liquidity.\16\ The Exchange believes that paying a $0.16 per 
contract credit toward the Routing Fee specified in Section V of the 
Pricing Schedule if a member organization qualifies for a Tier 2, 3 or 
4 rebate if the Customer order is routed to away market other than BX 
Options or NOM unless the away market transaction fee is $0.00 or a 
rebate is paid by the away market, in which case $0.11 per contract 
would be paid, is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the 
Exchange assesses an $0.11 per contract fixed cost in addition to the 
away market transaction fee to route to an away market other than NOM 
or BX Options. The Exchange is offering a credit of $0.16 per contract 
in those cases where there is an away market transaction fee or a 
rebate is not offered by the away market. When no transaction fee is 
assessed by the away market, the

[[Page 11920]]

Exchange would only assess the $0.11 per contract fixed fee and thus 
the member organization would recoup the fee assessed by the Exchange. 
If the away market pays a rebate to remove liquidity, the Exchange 
assesses the member organization the fixed fee of $0.11 per contract, 
the away market transaction fee and then credits the member 
organization the rebate offered by the Exchange. In that case, the 
Exchange would pay the reduced $0.11 per contract credit because the 
member organization has the benefit of the rebate from the away market. 
The Exchange also believes that the proposed credits are equitable and 
not unfairly discriminatory because any market participant that 
transacts Customer orders may qualify for the credit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ BX Options pays a $0.32 per contract Customer Rebate to 
Remove Liquidity in Penny Pilot Options, a $0.70 Customer Rebate to 
Remove Liquidity in Non-Penny Pilot Options (other than IWM, QQQ and 
SPY) and a $0.12 per contract Customer Rebate to Remove Liquidity in 
IWM, QQQ and SPY. See Chapter XV, Section 2(1) of the BX Options 
Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Exchange believes that offering member organizations a 
lower credit for Routing to NOM and BX Options as compared to other 
away markets is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the 
fixed cost associated with Routing Fees in Section V of the Pricing 
Schedule are lower for a Customer order routed to NOM or BX Options 
($0.05 per contract) as compared to the fixed cost to route to an away 
market other than BX Options or NOM ($0.11 per contract).\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ The Exchange assesses a fixed fee of $0.11 per contract for 
non-NASDAQ OMX exchanges and a $0.05 per contract fee for BX Options 
and NOM. These fixed costs represent overall cost to the Exchange 
for technical, administrative, clearing, regulatory, compliance and 
other costs, which are in addition to the transaction fee assessed 
by the away market. Also, market participants whose orders routed to 
away markets are entitled to receive rebates offered by away 
markets, which rebates would net against fees assessed by the 
Exchange for routing orders. As explained in a previous rule change, 
the actual cash outlays for the Exchange to route to BX Options and 
NOM is lower as compared to routing to other non-NASDAQ OMX 
exchanges. See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 68213 (November 
13, 2012), 77 FR 69530 (November 19, 2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-129) and 
68698 (January 18, 2013), 78 FR 5530 (January 25, 2013) (SR-Phlx-
2013-04). See also Section V of the Pricing Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Technical Amendments
    The Exchange's proposal to amend certain rule text in the Pricing 
Schedule to provide additional clarity, such as defining Common 
Ownership in the Preface to the Pricing Schedule and adding and 
amending other language to indicate the Monthly Market Maker Cap 
applies to electronic and floor transactions, and clarifying that the 
pricing specified in Section IV is in addition to other fees and 
rebates in Section I, including Payment for Order Flow fees where 
appropriate, is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory 
because the amendments further clarify the Pricing Schedule.
    The Exchange believes that it is reasonable, equitable and not 
unfairly discriminatory to amend Section I of the Pricing Schedule to 
add the words ``Complex Orders'' prior to the language discussing the 
Pilot Program related to the $0.05 per contract fee differential for 
Fees for Removing Liquidity for Specialists and Market Makers that 
transact against a Customer order directed to them because the addition 
of the words ``Complex Order'' further clarifies the Pricing Schedule.
    Finally, the Exchange believes that amending Section IV to permit a 
member or member organization under common ownership, defined as 75% 
common ownership or control, with another member or member organization 
that qualifies for a Customer Rebate Tier in Section A to receive 
discounted PIXL fees is reasonable because the Exchange desires to 
provide all market participants the ability to obtain discounted PIXL 
pricing. The Exchange currently permits aggregation under common 
ownership in Section IV for purposes of calculating the Threshold 
Volume. The Exchange believes that permitting members and member 
organizations that are affiliated and under common ownership to realize 
discounted pricing by allowing one firm to qualify for a Customer 
Rebate Tier and another affiliated member or member organization under 
common ownership to realize the discount is equitable and not unfairly 
discriminatory because the Exchange would permit all market 
participants the ability to aggregate the benefits of their trading 
activity for purposes of the Customer Rebate, as is the case today, 
even if certain members and member organizations chose to operate under 
separate entities. The Exchange currently permits such aggregation in 
the calculation of the Monthly Market Maker Cap and for purposes of 
PIXL fees.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See supra note 14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange believes that the 
Customer Rebate Program will encourage Customer order flow to be 
directed to the Exchange, which will benefit all market participants. 
By incentivizing members to route Customer orders, the Exchange desires 
to attract Customer orders which benefits all market participants by 
increasing liquidity on the Exchange. All market participants are 
eligible to qualify for a Customer Rebate. The Exchange believes these 
pricing amendments do not impose a burden on competition but rather 
that the proposed rule change will continue to promote competition on 
the Exchange.
    The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market, comprised of 
eleven exchanges, in which market participants can easily and readily 
direct order flow to competing venues if they deem fee levels at a 
particular venue to be excessive or rebates to be inadequate. 
Accordingly, the fees that are assessed and the rebates paid by the 
Exchange described in the above proposal are influenced by these robust 
market forces and therefore must remain competitive with fees charged 
and rebates paid by other venues and therefore must continue to be 
reasonable and equitably allocated to those members that opt to direct 
orders to the Exchange rather than competing venues.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\19\ At any time within 60 days of the 
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may 
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission 
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, 
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the 
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the 
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or

[[Page 11921]]

     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please 
include File Number SR-Phlx-2013-13 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2013-13. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2013-13 and should be 
submitted on or before March 13, 2013.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-03821 Filed 2-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P