Document ID: SEC-2013-1789-0001
Agency: sec
Document Type: Notice
Title: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes: International Securities Exchange, LLC
Posted Date: 2013-10-22T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62899-62901]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24654]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-70657; File No. SR-ISE-2013-51]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange, 
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule 
Change To Amend the Schedule of Fees

October 10, 2013.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that, on September 30, 2013, the International Securities Exchange, LLC 
(the ``Exchange'' or the ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and 
Exchange Commission the proposed rule change, as described in Items I, 
II, and III below, which items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to 
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The ISE proposes to amend its Schedule of Fees to permit ISE to 
exclude from its average daily volume calculations any trading day on 
which the Exchange is closed for trading due to early closing or a 
market-wide trading halt, and to correct a reference to ISE rules in 
the ``Flash Order'' definition. The text of the proposed rule change is 
available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.ise.com), at the 
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public 
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change

[[Page 62900]]

and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries, 
set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects 
of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange is proposing to permit ISE to exclude from its average 
daily volume (``ADV'') calculations any trading day on which the 
Exchange is closed for trading due to a market-wide trading halt, and 
to correct a reference to ISE rules in the ``Flash Order'' definition.
    The Exchange currently provides volume-based tiered rebates for 
Priority Customer complex orders when these orders trade with non-
Priority Customer orders in the complex order book,\3\ or trade with 
quotes and orders on the regular order book.\4\ These complex order 
rebates are provided to members in six tiers in both Standard and Mini 
Options based on the Member's ADV in Priority Customer complex 
contracts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Exchange offers a rebate in Standard and Mini Options 
for Priority Customer complex orders in (i) Select Symbols 
(excluding SPY), (ii) SPY, and (iii) Non-Select Symbols, when these 
orders trade with non-Priority Customer orders in the complex order 
book.
    \4\ The Exchange offers a rebate in Standard and Mini Options 
for Priority Customer complex orders that trade with quotes and 
orders on the regular order book in (i) SPY, and (ii) other symbols 
excluding SPY.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is proposing to modify its Schedule of Fees to permit 
the Exchange to exclude from its ADV calculation, when determining 
applicable rebate tiers, any day that the market is not open for the 
entire trading day. This would allow the Exchange to exclude days where 
the Exchange declares a trading halt in all securities or honors a 
market-wide trading halt declared by another market.\5\ For example, 
this would have allowed the Exchange to exclude August 22, 2013 when 
trading was halted in Nasdaq-listed securities for three hours across 
all exchanges.\6\ The Exchange will provide a notice, and post it on 
the Exchange's Web site, to inform Members of any day that is to be 
excluded from its ADV calculations in connection with this proposed 
rule change. The Exchange is not proposing any changes to the level of 
rebates currently being provided on the Exchange, or to the ADV 
thresholds required to achieve each rebate tier.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Exchange will not be excluding days on which the 
Exchange closes early for holiday observance from its ADV 
calculation.
    \6\ Trading in Nasdaq-listed securities was halted across all 
markets on August 22, 2013 due to a systems issue experienced by the 
NASDAQ UTP SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If the Exchange did not have the ability to exclude aberrant low 
volume days when calculating ADV for the month, as a result of the 
decreased trading volume, the numerator for the calculation (e.g., 
trading volume) would be correspondingly lower, but the denominator for 
the threshold calculations (e.g., the number of trading days) would not 
be decreased. This could result in an unintended cost increase. Absent 
the authority to exclude days that the market is not open for the 
entire trading day, Members will experience an effective decrease in 
rebates. The artificially low volumes of trading on such days could 
reduce the trading activity of Members both daily and monthly. 
Accordingly, excluding such days from the monthly calculation will 
diminish the likelihood of an effective increase in the cost of trading 
on the Exchange, a result that is unintended and undesirable to the 
Exchange and its Members.
    The Exchange is also proposing to amend its Schedule of Fees to 
correct a reference to ISE rules. The preface to the Schedule of Fees 
currently defines a ``Flash Order'' as an order that is exposed at the 
National Best Bid or Offer by the Exchange to all members for 
execution, as provided under Supplementary Material .02 to ISE Rule 
803. The Exchange recently modified its linkage rules referenced above, 
and in the process moved the relevant rule text from Supplementary 
Material .02 to ISE Rule 803 to Supplementary Material .02 to ISE Rule 
1901.\7\ The Exchange is therefore modifying the text of its Schedule 
of Fees to match the correct reference to Supplementary Material .02 to 
ISE Rule 1901. The Exchange notes that by clarifying this reference it 
is not making any substantive changes to the definition of a Flash 
Order, or to the fees and credits applicable to Flash Orders or 
responses to Flash Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69396 (April 18, 
2013) 78 FR 24273 (April 24, 2013) (SR-ISE-2013-18).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\8\ in general, and Section 
6(b)(4) of the Act,\9\ in particular, in that it is designed to provide 
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other 
charges among its members and other persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that it is equitable and reasonable to permit 
the Exchange to eliminate from the calculation days on which the market 
is not open the entire trading day because it preserves the Exchange's 
intent behind adopting volume-based pricing. The proposed change is 
non-discriminatory because it applies equally to all Members and to all 
volume tiers.
    The Exchange further believes that it is appropriate to correct the 
outdated reference to ISE rules in the ``Flash Order'' definition so 
that Exchange members and investors have a clear and accurate 
understanding of the meaning of the Exchange's rules, which will reduce 
investor confusion.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\10\ the Exchange 
does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden 
on intermarket or intramarket competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. With respect to 
ADV calculations for rebates, the Exchange notes that there are very 
few instances where the rule will actually be invoked, and when 
invoked, the Exchange believes the rule will have little or no impact 
on trading decisions or execution quality. To the contrary, the 
Exchange believes that the proposed modification to its ADV calculation 
is pro-competitive and will result in lower total costs to end users, a 
positive outcome of competitive markets. Moreover, other options 
exchanges have adopted rules that are substantially similar to the 
change in ADV calculation being proposed by the Exchange.\11\ With 
respect to the ``Flash Order'' definition, the Exchange further 
believes that making a technical correction to an outdated reference 
here as proposed is non-substantive, and therefore does not implicate 
the competition analysis. The Exchange operates in a highly competitive 
market in which market participants can readily direct their order flow 
to competing venues. In such an environment, the Exchange must 
continually review, and consider adjusting, its fees and rebates to 
remain competitive with other exchanges. For

[[Page 62901]]

the reasons described above, the Exchange believes that the proposed 
fee changes reflect this competitive environment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
    \11\ See e.g. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70472 
(September 23, 2013) (PHLX-2013-93); 70470 (Sept. 23, 2013) (NASDAQ-
2013-117).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit, 
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received 
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested 
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \12\ and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4 
thereunder,\13\ because it establishes a due, fee, or other charge 
imposed by ISE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-ISE-2013-51 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2013-51. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2013-51 and should be 
submitted on or before November 12, 2013.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-24654 Filed 10-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P