Document ID: USCG-2007-0292-0002
Agency: uscg
Document Type: Rule
Title: Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Quinnipiac River, New Haven, CT
Posted Date: 2007-09-27T04:00Z

[Federal Register: September 27, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 187)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 54835-54837]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr27se07-12]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD01-07-091]
RIN 1625-AA09

Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Quinnipiac River, New Haven, CT

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has temporarily changed the drawbridge
operating regulations governing the operation of the Ferry Street
Bridge, across the Quinnipiac River, mile 0.7, at New Haven,
Connecticut. This temporary final rule allows the bridge owner to keep
one of the two moveable bascule spans in the closed position at all
times from September 28, 2007 through April 30, 2008. This rule is
necessary to facilitate scheduled bridge maintenance.

DATES: This temporary rule is effective from September 28, 2007 through
April 30, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket (CGD01-07-091) and are available for inspection or
copying at the First Coast Guard District, Bridge Branch Office, 408
Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02110, between 7 a.m. and 3
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Judy Leung-Yee, Project Officer,
First Coast Guard District, (212) 668-7195.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    On August 21, 2007, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ``Drawbridge Operation Regulations''; Quinnipiac River,
Connecticut, in the Federal Register (72 FR 46586). We received no
comments in response to the notice of proposed rulemaking. No public
hearing was requested and none was held.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
    The bridge repairs scheduled to begin on September 28, 2007, are
necessary repairs that must be performed with all due speed to assure
the continued safe and reliable operation of the bridge. Any delay in
making this rule effective would not be in the best interest of public
safety and the marine interests that use the Quinnipiac River.
    The recreational vessels that normally use this waterway are small
enough in size that they can either pass under the spans without a
bridge opening or safely pass through the bridge with a single span
opening.

Background and Purpose

    The Street Bridge, across the Quinnipiac River, mile 0.7, at New
Haven, Connecticut, has a vertical clearance in the closed position of
25 feet at mean high water and 31 feet at mean low water. The existing
regulations are listed at 33 CFR 117.213.
    In early 2007, the Connecticut Department of Transportation
requested a temporary deviation to facilitate scheduled structural
repairs and bridge painting at the Ferry Street Bridge at New Haven,
Connecticut. In order to perform the structural repairs, one bascule
bridge span had to remain in the closed position while the other span
could remain in the full open position at all times for the passage of
vessel traffic.
    As a result of the above request, the Coast Guard published a
temporary deviation from the drawbridge operation regulations in the
Federal Register (72 FR 18884), on April 16, 2007, in effect from April
16, 2007 through September 27, 2007.
    On June 22, 2007, the Coast Guard was notified that the scheduled
repairs authorized under the temporary deviation listed above would not
be completed by the end of the effective period scheduled to end on
September 27, 2007.
    As a result of the above information, Connecticut Department of
Transportation requested a temporary regulation to allow the repair
work to continue at the bridge through April 30, 2008, in order to
complete the remaining work.
    Under this temporary final rule, in effect from September 28, 2007
through April 30, 2008, the Ferry Street Bridge across the Quinnipiac
River, mile 0.7, at New Haven, Connecticut, will keep one of the two
bascule bridge spans in the closed position at all times while keeping
the second bascule span in the fully open position for the passage of
vessel traffic at all times.

Discussion of Comments and Changes

    The Coast Guard received no comments in response to the notice of
proposed rulemaking and as a result, no changes have been made to this
temporary final rule.

Regulatory Evaluation

    This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3), of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
    This conclusion is based on the fact that the bridge will continue
to open for vessel traffic with a single moveable span which is
sufficient for the present needs of navigation.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not

[[Page 54836]]

dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with
populations less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    This conclusion is based on the fact that the bridge will continue
to open for vessel traffic with a single moveable span which is
sufficient for the present needs of navigation.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
    No small entities requested Coast Guard assistance and none was
given.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This final rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have substantial direct effect on one
or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation considering that it relates to the
promulgation of operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the instruction, an
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' are not required for this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    Bridges.

0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR
part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. From September 28, 2007 through April 30, 2008, Sec.  117.213 is
amended by suspending paragraph (a) and adding a temporary paragraph
(g) to read as follows:

Sec.  117.213  Connecticut River.

* * * * *
    (g) The draws shall open on signal; except as follows:
    (1) From 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m., noon to 12:15 p.m., 12:45 p.m. to
1 p.m., and

[[Page 54837]]

4:45 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., the draws need not be opened.
    (2) The draw of the Ferry Street Bridge, mile 0.7, at New Haven,
shall maintain one of the two moveable bascule bridge spans in the full
open position at all times for the passage of vessel traffic. The
second moveable bascule bridge span may remain in the closed position
at all times.
    (3) From 11 p.m. to 7 a.m., the draw of the Grand Avenue Bridge,
Quinnipiac River, shall open on signal if at least one hour notice is
given to the tender at the Ferry Street Bridge. In the event that the
tender is at the Chapel Street Bridge, a delay of up to an additional
hour may be expected.
    (4) From 9 p.m. to 5 a.m., the draw of the Chapel Street Bridge,
Mill River, shall open on signal if at least one hour notice is given
to the tender at Ferry Street Bridge. In the event the tender is at the
Grand Avenue Bridge, a delay of up to an additional hour may be
expected.

    Dated: September 21, 2007.
Timothy V. Skuby,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, First Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. E7-19109 Filed 9-26-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P