Document ID: EPA-HQ-RCRA-1999-0076-0027
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2002-07-01T04:00Z

MEMORANDUM
TO:
3848.241
file
FROM:
Craig
Simons,
DPRA
DATE:
November
1,
1999
SUBJ:
Record
of
communication
with
Sun­
Glo
Plating
(Don).
(727­
546­
8974)

I
called
to
ask
about
the
minimum
charge
assumptions
they
experienced
in
handling
F006–
talking
first
with
Andrew
Pozin,
who
put
me
in
touch
with
their
environmental
manager
(Don).
According
to
the
1995
BRS
they
generate
about
15
tons
per
year
of
F006.
While
they
used
to
recycle
they
do
not
do
so
currently–
it
is
just
not
economical
(hence
they
landfill
the
material).

Back
when
they
did
recycle
they
paid
a
minimum
fee–
he
said
that
our
assumption
of
$1,350
would
be
about
what
they
were
paying.
But
basically
they
have
quit
because
it
is
not
economical.
He
felt
that
a
change
in
the
allowed
accumulation
time
to
180/
270
days
would
make
the
recycling
more
economical,
making
it
much
more
practical
to
recycle.
He
noted
the
90
day
rule
was
very
restricting
to
them.

He
did
note
that
there
were
not
any
recyclers
in
Florida,
which
further
hampered
the
ability
to
recycle
economically,
though
a
relaxation
of
the
90
waste
accumulation
time
would
be
helpful.