Document ID: SEC-2020-1553-0001
Agency: sec
Document Type: Notice
Title: Application: Deutsche Bank AG, et al.
Posted Date: 2020-09-30T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 190 (Wednesday, September 30, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61789-61793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-21545]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 34025; File No. 812-15163]

Deutsche Bank AG, et al.

September 24, 2020.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').

ACTION: Temporary order and notice of application for a permanent order 
under section 9(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (``Act'').

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Applicants have received a temporary order (``Temporary 
Order'') exempting them from section 9(a) of the Act, with respect to 
an injunction entered against Deutsche Bank AG on June 17, 2020 by the 
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (``District 
Court''), in connection with a consent order between Deutsche Bank AG 
and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (``CFTC''), until the 
Commission takes final action on an application for a permanent order 
(the ``Permanent Order,'' and with the Temporary Order, the 
``Orders''). Applicants also have applied for a Permanent Order.
    Applicants: Deutsche Bank AG; DWS Investment Management Americas, 
Inc. (``DIMA''), DWS International GmbH (``DWSI''), DWS Investments 
Australia Limited (``DIAL''), RREEF America L.L.C. (``RREEF''), DWS 
Alternatives Global Limited (``DAAM Global''), DBX Advisors LLC (``DBX 
Advisors''), DWS Distributors, Inc. (``DDI''), Harvest Global 
Investments Limited (``Harvest'') and DWS Investments Hong Kong Limited 
(``DIHK'') (each a ``Fund Servicing Applicant,'' and together with 
Deutsche Bank AG, the ``Applicants'').
    Filing Date: The application was filed on September 24, 2020, and 
amended on September 24, 2020.
    Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the 
application will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. 
Interested persons may request a hearing by emailing the Commission's 
Secretary Secretarys-Office@sec.gov and serving Applicants with a copy 
of the request by email. Hearing requests should be received by the 
Commission by 5:30 p.m. on October 19, 2020 and should be accompanied 
by proof of service on Applicants, in the form of an affidavit, or for 
lawyers, a certificate of service. Pursuant to rule 0-5 under the Act, 
hearing requests should state the nature of the writer's interest, any 
facts bearing upon the desirability of a hearing on the matter, the 
reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to 
be notified of a hearing may request notification by emailing the 
Commission's Secretary at Secretarys-Office@sec.gov.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 
Secretarys-Office@sec.gov; Applicants: Caroline Pearson, DWS Investment 
Management Americas, Inc., Regulatory.notices@dws.com.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Adam Bolter, Senior Counsel at (202) 
551-6011 or David Nicolardi, Branch Chief at (202) 551-6825 (Division 
of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a temporary order and a 
summary of the application. The complete application may be obtained 
via the Commission's website by searching for the file number, or an 
applicant using the Company name box, at http://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm, or by calling (202) 551-8090.

Applicants' Representations

    1. Deutsche Bank AG, a stock corporation organized under the laws 
of Germany, controls DWS Group GmbH & Co. KGaA (``DWS Group''). The 
Fund Servicing Applicants collectively serve as investment adviser (as 
defined in section 2(a)(20) of the Act to 130 management investment 
companies registered under the Act or series thereof (``Funds'') and as 
principal underwriter (as defined in section 2(a)(29) of the Act) to 74 
open-end registered investment companies under the Act (``Open-End 
Funds''). Each of the Fund Servicing Applicants listed below (other 
than Harvest) is a wholly owned subsidiary of DWS Group. Following its 
initial public offering in March 2018, DWS Group became a public 
company, listed and traded on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, that is as 
of June 30, 2020 a 79.49% owned subsidiary of Deutsche Bank AG.
    2. DIMA, a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware, is a 
wholly owned subsidiary of DWS Group and is an investment adviser 
registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the 
``Advisers Act''). DIMA provides investment advisory and management 
services to the Funds listed on Part 1-A of Annex A of the application, 
and investment sub-advisory services to the Funds listed on Part 1-B of 
Annex A of the application.
    3. DWSI, a limited liability company organized under the laws of 
Germany, is a wholly owned subsidiary of DWS Group and is an investment 
adviser registered under the Advisers Act. DWSI provides investment 
advisory services to the Funds listed on Part 2-A of Annex A of the 
application, and investment sub-advisory services to the Funds listed 
on Part 2-B of Annex A of the application.
    4. DIAL, a corporation organized under the laws of Australia, is a 
wholly owned subsidiary of DWS Group and is an investment adviser 
registered under the Advisers Act. DIAL provides investment sub-
advisory services to the Fund listed on Part 3-A of Annex A of the 
application, investment sub-sub-advisory services to the Funds listed 
on Part 3-B of Annex A of the application, and investment sub-sub-sub- 
advisory services to the Fund listed on Part 3-C of Annex A of the 
application.
    5. RREEF, a Delaware limited liability company, is a wholly owned 
subsidiary of DWS Group and is an investment adviser registered under 
the Advisers Act. RREEF provides investment sub-advisory services to 
the Funds listed on Part 4-A of Annex A of the application, and 
investment sub-sub- advisory services to the Funds listed on Part 4-B 
of Annex A of the application.
    6. DAAM Global, a UK limited company, is a wholly owned subsidiary 
of DWS Group and is an investment adviser registered under the Advisers 
Act. DAAM Global provides investment sub- advisory services to the Fund 
listed on Part 5-A of Annex A of the application, investment sub-sub-
advisory services to the Funds listed on Part 5-B of Annex A of the 
application, and investment sub-sub-sub-advisory services to the Fund 
listed on Part 5-C of Annex A of the application.
    7. DBX Advisors, a Delaware limited liability company, is a wholly 
owned subsidiary of DWS Group and is an investment adviser registered 
under the Advisers Act. DBX Advisors provides investment advisory 
services to the Funds listed on Part 6 of Annex A of the application.
    8. DDI, a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware, is a 
wholly owned subsidiary of DIMA and is a broker-dealer registered under 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Exchange Act''). 
DDI serves as principal underwriter (``Underwriter'')

[[Page 61790]]

for the Open-End Funds listed on Part 7 of Annex A of the application.
    9. Harvest, a Hong Kong limited company by shares, is the wholly 
owned subsidiary of a joint venture of which Deutsche Bank AG is an 
affiliated person (within the meaning of section 2(a)(3) of the Act) 
(``Affiliated Person'') due to its indirect minority ownership interest 
through a DWS Group subsidiary. Harvest is an investment adviser 
registered under the Advisers Act and provides investment advisory 
services to the Funds listed on Part 8-A of Annex A of the application 
and investment sub-advisory services to the Funds listed on Part 8-B of 
Annex A of the application.
    10. DIHK, a Hong Kong limited company by shares, is a wholly owned 
subsidiary of DWS Group and is an investment adviser registered under 
the Advisers Act. DIHK provides investment sub-advisory services to the 
Funds listed on Part 9 of Annex A of the application.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ DIMA, DWSI, DIAL, RREEF, DAAM Global, DBX Advisors, Harvest 
and DIHK collectively are the ``Adviser Applicants.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    11. Other than the Fund Servicing Applicants, neither Deutsche Bank 
AG nor any existing company of which Deutsche Bank AG is an Affiliated 
Person currently serves as an investment adviser (as defined in section 
2(a)(20) of the Act), including sub-adviser, or depositor of any 
registered investment company, employees' securities company or 
investment company that has elected to be treated as a business 
development company under the Act, or as principal underwriter (as 
defined in section 2(a)(29) of the Act) for any open-end registered 
investment company, registered unit investment trust (``UIT'') or 
registered face amount certificate company (``FACC'') (such activities, 
the ``Fund Servicing Activities'').\2\ Applicants request that any 
relief granted by the Commission pursuant to the application also apply 
to any existing company of which Deutsche Bank AG is an Affiliated 
Person and to any other company of which Deutsche Bank AG may become an 
Affiliated Person in the future (together with the Fund Servicing 
Applicants, the ``Covered Persons'') with respect to any activity 
contemplated by section 9(a) of the Act.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ None of Applicants currently acts as investment adviser, 
depositor or principal underwriter to investment companies that have 
elected to be treated as business development companies under the 
Act, registered unit investment trusts or registered face-amount 
certificate companies.
    \3\ Applicants and other Covered Persons may, if the Orders are 
granted, in the future act in any of the capacities contemplated by 
section 9(a) of the Act subject to the applicable terms and 
conditions of the Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    12. On August 18, 2016, the CFTC filed a complaint (the 
``Complaint'') against Deutsche Bank AG in the U.S. District Court for 
the Southern District of New York (``District Court'') in a civil 
injunctive action captioned U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 
v. Deutsche Bank AG. The Complaint sought injunctive and other 
equitable relief, as well as the imposition of civil monetary 
penalties, alleging (1) violations of a prior CFTC Order (``CFTC 
Order''); and (2) new violations of the Commodity Exchange Act (the 
``CEA''), 7 U.S.C. 1-26 (2012), and the CFTC's Regulations 
(``Regulations'') promulgated thereunder, 17 CFR pts. 1-190 (2016), 
relating to the firm's unintentional failure to meet its 
responsibilities regarding swap data reporting and its business 
continuity and disaster recovery plan, and a corresponding failure to 
diligently supervise activities relating to its swap reporting 
responsibilities (the ``Conduct'').
    The Complaint was filed following an inadvertent, five-day outage 
of Deutsche Bank AG's swap reporting platform in April 2016. During the 
outage, Deutsche Bank AG was unable to submit any price or transaction 
data to the data repository. At the time of the outage, Deutsche Bank 
AG was subject to a CFTC Order which had resolved an investigation into 
a prior swap reporting error and required Deutsche Bank AG to remediate 
its swap data reporting program. In connection with these remedial 
undertakings, Deutsche Bank AG attempted to perform a maintenance 
upgrade to its swap reporting platform. During this process, outdated 
or unsynchronized data files were inadvertently copied to the main 
platform, resulting in the outage.
    13. When the Complaint was filed, the CFTC simultaneously sought--
and Deutsche Bank AG then consented to--the District Court's 
appointment of an independent monitor (``Monitor'') to facilitate the 
firm's compliance with its reporting responsibilities under the CFTC 
Order, the Act and the Regulations. On October 20, 2016, the District 
Court issued a Consent Order of Preliminary Injunction and Other 
Equitable Relief against Deutsche Bank AG \4\ by which the District 
Court appointed the Monitor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Although the title of the October 20, 2016 order includes a 
preliminary injunction, that order does not enjoin any activity and 
therefore was not disqualifying under section 9(a) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    14. The Monitorship concluded on May 20, 2019 and the Monitor 
submitted his final report on August 3, 2019. As of that date, the 
Monitor concluded that Deutsche Bank AG had addressed the Monitor's 
recommendations.
    15. On June 17, 2020, the District Court (i) ordered Deutsche Bank 
AG to comply with the CFTC Order and (ii) instituted an injunction 
permanently enjoining Deutsche Bank AG from violating, among other 
provisions, section 2(a)(13)(F) and (G) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. 
2(a)(13)(F), (G) (2018) (for failing to comply with the swap data 
reporting requirements) (the ``Injunction'') (together, with the 
Injunction, the ``Consent Order''). The Consent Order also requires 
Deutsche Bank AG to pay a civil monetary penalty in the amount of 
$9,000,000.
    16. Applicants represent that escrow accounts have been established 
with a third party financial institution (``Escrow Agent'') into which 
amounts equal to the advisory (including sub-advisory, sub-sub-advisory 
and sub-sub-sub-advisory) fees paid, by the Funds (or in the case of 
sub-advisory, sub-sub-advisory and sub-sub-sub advisory fees, by the 
adviser or sub-adviser of the respective Funds) to the Adviser 
Applicants have been and will continue to be deposited for the period 
from June 17, 2020 through the date upon which the Commission grants 
the Temporary Order.

Applicants' Legal Analysis

    1. Section 9(a)(2) of the Act provides, in pertinent part, that a 
person may not serve or act as, among other things, an investment 
adviser or depositor of any registered investment company or as 
principal underwriter for any registered open-end investment company, 
UIT, or FACC, if such person ``. . . by reason of any misconduct, is 
permanently or temporarily enjoined by order, judgment, or decree of 
any court of competent jurisdiction from acting as an underwriter, 
broker, dealer, investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, 
government securities broker, government securities dealer, bank, 
transfer agent, credit rating agency or entity or person required to be 
registered under the Commodity Exchange Act, or as an affiliated 
person, salesman, or employee of any investment company, bank, 
insurance company, or entity or person required to be registered under 
the Commodity Exchange Act, or from engaging in or continuing any 
conduct or practice in connection with any such activity or in 
connection with the purchase or sale of any security.'' Section 9(a)(3) 
of the Act makes the prohibitions of section 9(a)(2) applicable to a 
company, any affiliated person of which has been disqualified

[[Page 61791]]

under the provisions of section 9(a)(2). Section 2(a)(3) of the Act 
defines ``affiliated person'' to include, among others, any person 
directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common 
control with, the other person. The Injunction results in a 
disqualification of Deutsche Bank AG from acting in the capacities 
specified in section 9(a)(2) because Deutsche Bank AG is permanently 
enjoined by the District Court from engaging in or continuing certain 
conduct and/or practices in connection with the offer or sale of any 
security. The Injunction also results in the disqualification of the 
Fund Servicing Applicants under section 9(a)(3) because each of the 
Fund Servicing Applicants may be considered to be an Affiliated Person. 
Other Covered Persons similarly would be disqualified pursuant to 
section 9(a)(3) were they to act in any of the capacities listed in 
section 9(a).
    2. Section 9(c) of the Act provides that, upon application, the 
Commission shall by order grant an exemption from the disqualification 
provisions of section 9(a) of the Act, either unconditionally or on an 
appropriate temporary or other conditional basis, to any person if that 
person establishes that: (1) The prohibitions of section 9(a), as 
applied to the person, are unduly or disproportionately severe; or (2) 
the conduct of the person has been such as not to make it against the 
public interest or the protection of investors to grant the exemption. 
Applicants have filed an application pursuant to section 9(c) seeking a 
Temporary Order and a Permanent Order exempting the Fund Servicing 
Applicants and other Covered Persons from the disqualification 
provisions of section 9(a) of the Act.
    3. Applicants believe they meet the standards for exemption 
specified in section 9(c). Applicants assert that: (i) The scope of the 
misconduct was limited and did not involve any of the Fund Servicing 
Applicants performing Fund Servicing Activities, or any Fund for which 
the Fund Servicing Applicants engaged in Fund Servicing Activities or 
their respective assets; (ii) application of the statutory bar would 
potentially result in material economic losses, and the operations of 
the Funds would be disrupted as they sought to engage new underwriters, 
advisers and/or sub-advisers, as the case may be; (iii) the 
prohibitions of section 9(a), if applied to the Fund Servicing 
Applicants and other Covered Persons, would be unduly or 
disproportionately severe; and (iv) the Conduct did not constitute 
conduct that would make it against the public interest or protection of 
investors to grant the exemption from section 9(a).
    4. Applicants assert that the Conduct giving rise to the Injunction 
did not involve the performance of Fund Servicing Activities and the 
personnel of the Fund Servicing Applicants involved in Fund Service 
Activities did not have any involvement in the Conduct. Accordingly, 
Applicants assert that it would be unduly and disproportionately severe 
to allow section 9(a) to disqualify Covered Persons from providing Fund 
Servicing Activities.
    5. Applicants maintain that neither the protection of investors nor 
the public interest would be served by permitting the section 9(a) 
disqualifications to apply to the Fund Servicing Applicants because 
those disqualifications would deprive the Funds of the advisory or sub-
advisory and underwriting services that shareholders expected the Funds 
would receive when they decided to invest in the Funds. Applicants also 
assert that the prohibitions of section 9(a) could operate to the 
financial detriment of the Funds and their shareholders, which would be 
an unduly and disproportionately severe consequence given that no Fund 
Servicing Applicants were involved in the Conduct and that the Conduct 
did not involve the Funds or Fund Servicing Activities. Applicants 
further assert that the inability of the Fund Servicing Applicants to 
continue providing investment advisory and underwriting services to 
Funds would result in the Funds and their shareholders facing other 
potential hardships, as described in the application.
    6. Applicants assert that if the Fund Servicing Applicants were 
barred under section 9(a) from providing investment advisory and 
underwriting services to the Funds and were unable to obtain the 
requested exemption, the effect on their businesses and employees would 
be severe. Applicants represent that the Fund Servicing Applicants have 
committed substantial capital and resources to establishing expertise 
in advising and sub-advising Funds and in support of their principal 
underwriting business. Prohibiting them from providing Fund Servicing 
Activities would not only adversely affect each Fund Servicing 
Applicant's business, but would also adversely affect their employees 
that are involved in these activities.
    7. Applicants state that the Conduct centered on Deutsche Bank AG's 
swaps reporting system and the supervision thereof, and did not involve 
(and was not alleged by the CFTC to involve) any intentional wrongdoing 
on the part of the firm or its personnel. Applicants state that (i) 
none of the Fund Servicing Applicants' current or former directors, 
officers or employees had any involvement in the Conduct; (ii) the 
personnel who were involved in the Conduct (or who may be subsequently 
identified by the Applicants as having been involved in the Conduct) 
have never had, do not currently have and will not in the future have 
any involvement in providing Fund Servicing Activities at a Covered 
Person; \5\ and (iii) because the Conduct did not involve the 
performance of Fund Serving Activities and the personnel of the Fund 
Servicing Applicants involved in Fund Servicing Activities did not have 
any involvement in the Conduct, shareholders of Funds that received 
investment advisory, depository and principal underwriting services 
from the Fund Servicing Applicants were not affected in any way.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ To make these representations, internal counsel and human 
resources personnel confirmed that the individuals involved with the 
Conduct were not and are not officers, directors, or employees (and 
in the case of DWS, associated persons) of any Fund Servicing 
Applicant and had no involvement with Fund Servicing Activities. The 
Applicants also represent that the Funds did not at the time of the 
Conduct and do not enter into swap transactions with Deutsche Bank 
AG.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    8. Applicants represent that over a four-year period from 2015 to 
2019, Deutsche Bank AG engaged in extensive remediation of its swap 
reporting systems and procedures, including, among other things, 
establishing an enhanced control framework, automating control 
processes, and enhancing its business continuity and disaster recovery 
capabilities for swap data reporting. Applicants represent that they 
have established specific governance around culture and ethical 
conduct. As a result of the foregoing, and additional remedial measures 
detailed in the application, Applicants submit that granting the 
exemption as requested in the application is consistent with the public 
interest and the protection of investors.
    9. To provide further assurance that the exemptive relief being 
requested herein would be consistent with the public interest and the 
protection of the investors, Applicants represent that the relevant 
Fund Servicing Applicants (other than Harvest) participated in 
telephonic meetings of each of the Boards of the Funds for which the 
Fund Servicing Applicants serve as the primary investment adviser and/
or principal underwriter, as indicated in Appendix A of the 
application, during the week of June 21, 2020. Applicants

[[Page 61792]]

further represent that, prior to or at these meetings, written 
materials were provided to each Board, including those directors who 
are not ``interested persons'' of such Funds as defined in section 
2(a)(19) of the Act (the ``Independent Directors'') and, where 
relevant, their independent legal counsel as defined in rule 0-1(a)(6) 
under the Act. Applicants represent that the materials described the 
Conduct, the Consent Order, the disqualification under section 9(a) of 
the Act, and the process for obtaining exemptive relief under section 
9(c) of the Act.\6\ With respect to the Funds for which any of the 
Applicants (other than Harvest) serve as the primary investment adviser 
or principal underwriter, as indicated in Appendix A of the 
application, Applicants represent that the respective Boards, including 
the Independent Directors of the Boards, by a unanimous vote of those 
present (including all of the Independent Directors of each Board) 
determined that the circumstances giving rise to the entry of the 
Consent Order do not adversely affect the capability of the relevant 
Applicants or (for Open-End Funds) the Underwriter to provide 
investment advisory or principal underwriting services to the 
respective Funds, or diminishes the nature, extent, quality or value of 
the services already provided to the respective Funds. Fund Servicing 
Applicants undertake to provide the Boards with all information 
concerning the Injunction and the application that is necessary for the 
Funds to fulfill their disclosure and other obligations under the U.S. 
federal securities laws.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Applicants represent that, with respect to each of the Funds 
for which a Fund Servicing Applicant is not the primary investment 
adviser, the Fund Servicing Applicants normally communicate with the 
primary investment adviser rather than directly with the Board of 
that Fund. Applicants further represent that, with respect to the 
two Funds advised by Harvest, communications are normally with the 
administrator of the Funds for which Harvest serves as primary 
investment adviser rather than directly with the Board of those 
Funds. During the week of June 21, 2020 (or, in the case of Harvest, 
on June 29, 2020), the relevant Fund Servicing Applicants provided 
similar written materials (as discussed above) to the primary 
investment advisers and administrator, as applicable. Applicants 
represent that none of such Funds, their primary investment advisers 
or the administrator of the Funds advised by Harvest has requested 
that the Fund Servicing Applicants cease providing sub-advisory 
services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    10. Applicants represent that Deutsche Bank AG has undertaken a 
process in its centralized global litigation and regulatory group for 
considering potential collateral consequences associated with the 
settlement of matters involving regulators and law enforcement 
authorities. This process requires the engagement of outside counsel to 
complete a collateral consequences analysis in advance of all 
anticipated settlements with regulators and law enforcement 
authorities, regardless of the form of resolution, to ensure that any 
potential disqualifications are promptly identified and proactively 
addressed.
    11. Certain Fund Servicing Applicants, as well as certain of their 
affiliates, have previously applied for exemptive orders under section 
9(c) of the Act, as described in greater detail in the application. 
Applicants, however, state that none of the conduct underlying the 
previous section 9(c) orders granted to Fund Servicing Applicants 
involved the provision of Fund Servicing Activities.

Applicants' Conditions

    Applicants agree that any order granted by the Commission pursuant 
to the application will be subject to the following conditions:
    1. As a condition to the Temporary Order, Applicants will hold in 
escrow with the Escrow Agent, a third party institution, amounts equal 
to all advisory (including sub-advisory, sub-sub-advisory and sub-sub-
sub-advisory) fees paid by the Funds (or in the case of sub-advisory, 
sub-sub-advisory and sub-sub-sub-advisory fees, by the adviser or sub-
adviser of the respective Funds), to the Adviser Applicants for the 
period from June 17, 2020 through the date upon which the Commission 
grants the Temporary Order. Amounts paid into the escrow accounts will 
be disbursed by the Escrow Agent to each Adviser Applicant after the 
Commission has acted on the application for the Permanent Order.
    2. Any temporary exemption granted pursuant to the application 
shall be without prejudice to, and shall not limit the Commission's 
rights in any manner with respect to, any Commission investigation of, 
or administrative proceedings involving or against, Covered Persons, 
including, without limitation, the consideration by the Commission of a 
permanent exemption from section 9(a) of the Act requested pursuant to 
the application or the revocation or removal of any temporary 
exemptions granted under the Act in connection with the application.
    3. Each Applicant and Covered Person will adopt and implement 
policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that it will 
comply with the terms and conditions of the Orders within 60 days of 
the date of the Permanent Order.
    4. Deutsche Bank AG will comply with the terms and conditions of 
the Consent Order in all material respects. In addition, within 30 days 
of each anniversary of the Permanent Order (until and including the 
third such anniversary), Deutsche Bank AG will submit a certification 
signed by its chief legal officer and chief executive officer, 
confirming that it has complied with the terms and conditions of the 
Consent Order in all material respects. Such certification will be 
submitted to the Chief Counsel of the Commission's Division of 
Investment Management with a copy to the Chief Counsel of the 
Commission's Division of Enforcement.
    5. The Applicants, including the Settling Firm, will provide 
written notification to the Chief Counsel of the Commission's Division 
of Investment Management, with a copy to the Chief Counsel of the 
Commission's Division of Enforcement, of any material or known 
violation of the terms and conditions of the Orders within 30 days of 
discovery of each such material or known violation. In addition, within 
30 days of the first anniversary of the Permanent Order, the Applicants 
will submit a report, signed by the chief executive officer of Deutsche 
Bank AG, to the Chief Counsel of the Commission's Division of 
Investment Management describing (i) the findings of the internal 
compliance review concerning the process for assessing collateral 
consequences described in section IV.F of the application and any steps 
taken to address areas for improvement identified in those findings and 
(ii) the steps that Deutsche Bank AG and the Fund Servicing Applicants 
have taken since the date of the Permanent Order to foster a culture of 
compliance, as further described in section IV.F of the application.

Temporary Order

    The Commission has considered the matter and finds that Applicants 
have made the necessary showing to justify granting a temporary 
exemption.
    Accordingly,
    It is hereby ordered, pursuant to section 9(c) of the Act, that the 
Applicants and any other Covered Persons are granted a temporary 
exemption from the provisions of section 9(a), effective as of the date 
of the Injunction, solely with respect to the Injunction, subject to 
the representations and conditions in the application, until the 
Commission takes final action on their application for a permanent 
order.

[[Page 61793]]

    By the Commission.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-21545 Filed 9-29-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P