Document ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2003-0050-0004
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2003-03-21T05:00Z

June
1999
APPENDIX
D
SYSTEM
BURDEN
AND
COST
MODELS
!
Reading
the
Revised
Regulation
and
Training
Staff
on
New
Requirements
!
Lead
and
Copper
Tap
Monitoring
Models
!
Water
Quality
Parameter
Monitoring
Models
!
Source
Water
Monitoring
Models
!
Lead
Service
Line
Monitoring
Models
!
Public
Education
Models
!
System
Reporting
Models
June
1999
D­
1
READING
THE
REVISED
REGULATION
AND
TRAINING
STAFF
ON
NEW
REQUIREMENTS
By
definition,
only
under
the
LCRMR
will
systems
incur
cost
and
burden
related
to
reading
the
revised
regulation
and
training
staff
on
these
rule
modifications.
Thus,
the
baseline
for
this
set
of
cost
and
burden
estimates
is
zero,
and
the
estimates
presented
below
represent
both
the
revised
and
net
costs
associated
with
the
rule.
Costs
and
burden
are
assumed
to
only
be
incurred
during
the
first
year
of
implementation
­­
1999.
Further,
each
system
is
assumed
to
incur
an
average
of
4
hours
of
burden
for
reading,
and
4
hours
for
training.
The
1999
estimates
for
both
cost
and
burden
are
presented
below
in
a
side­
by­
side
table.

READING
&
TRAINING
FOR
THE
RULE
REVISIONS
ALL
WATER
SYSTEMS,
All
$
Totals
in
thousands,
Burden
in
hours
System
Size
Number
of
Systems
Burden
1999
Cost
1999
25­
100
26,706
213,648
$
3,053.0
101­
500
24,485
195,880
$
2,799.1
501­
1K
7,911
63,288
$
904.4
1K­
3.3K
8,991
71,928
$
1,027.9
3.3K­
10K
4,323
34,584
$
577.2
10K­
25K
1,929
15,432
$
257.6
25K­
50K
865
6,920
$
115.5
50K­
75K
289
2,312
$
38.6
75K­
100K
117
936
$
15.6
100K­
500K
286
2,288
$
38.2
500K­
1M
28
224
$
3.7
>
1M
15
120
$
2.0
Total
75,945
607,560
$
8,832.8
June
1999
D­
2
LEAD
AND
COPPER
TAP
WATER
MONITORING
MODELS
The
Baseline
and
LCRMR
Tap
Water
Monitoring
Schedules
present
the
total
number
of
samples
per
year
during
1999
­
2009
for
each
system
for
each
of
the
possible
monitoring
scenarios.
In
the
baseline
model
(
i.
e.,
represents
the
original
LCR),
systems
are
assigned
to
one
of
five
possible
monitoring
scenarios
that
are
dependent
on
whether
or
not
the
system:
exceeds
the
action
level
during
initial
monitoring,
is
required
to
conduct
a
study,
and
continues
to
exceed
after
treatment.
The
five
monitoring
scenarios
are:

°
Scenario
1:
Small
&
medium
systems
that
are
below
the
action
level
&
and
large
(
b)(
3)
systems.
°
Scenario
2a:
Small
and
medium
systems
that
exceed
the
action
level,
are
required
to
conduct
a
corrosion
control
study,
and
no
longer
exceed
after
the
installation
of
corrosion
control
treatment
(
CCT)
°
Scenario
2b:
Small
and
medium
systems
that
exceed
the
action
level,
are
not
required
to
conduct
a
study,
and
no
longer
exceed
after
the
installation
of
CCT.
°
Scenario
3a:
Systems
that
exceed
the
action
level,
are
required
to
conduct
a
corrosion
control
study,
and
continue
to
exceed
after
the
installation
of
CCT.
°
Scenario
3b:
Small
and
medium
systems
that
exceed
the
action
level,
are
not
required
to
conduct
a
study
and
continue
to
exceed
after
the
installation
of
CCT.

Note:
Any
exceedance
is
assumed
to
occur
during
the
initial
round
of
monitoring.

Under
the
baseline,
the
171
large
(
b)(
3)
systems
were
not
assumed
to
monitor
beyond
the
initial
monitoring
that
was
required
in
1992.
Therefore,
these
171
systems
are
not
included
in
the
baseline
model.
The
remaining
564
systems
are
in
Scenario
3a
because
these
systems
are
required
to
conduct
a
study
and
can
only
proceed
to
reduced
lead
and
copper
tap
monitoring
if
they
meet
optimal
water
quality
parameters
(
OWQPs)
versus
qualifying
for
reduced
monitoring
once
they
are
below
the
action
level
for
two
consecutive
6­
month
monitoring
periods
(
i.
e.,
Scenarios
2a
and
2b).

The
LCRMR
Tap
Water
Monitoring
Model
contains
three
additional
scenarios.
Scenario
1R
applies
to
small
systems
that
have
received
a
lead
and
copper
monitoring
waiver.
Scenario
2aAR
applies
to
medium
and
small
systems
that
are
required
to
conduct
a
study
and
qualify
for
accelerated
reduced
monitoring
after
the
installation
of
treatment.
Scenario
2bAR
includes
those
medium
and
small
systems
that
qualify
for
accelerated
reduced
monitoring
after
treatment
installation,
but
which
are
not
required
to
conduct
a
study.
Scenario
3aAR
applies
to
large
systems
that
install
treatment
and
qualify
for
accelerated
reduced
monitoring.

Both
the
baseline
and
LCRMR
estimates
assume
that
laboratory
costs
are
$
7.31
per
tap
sample
analysis.
The
commercial
fee
of
$
30
was
adjusted
to
eliminate
the
labor
component
to
avoid
double
counting,
as
all
analyses
are
assumed
to
be
performed
in­
house
(
i.
e.,
$
30
­
$
22.69).
In
addition,
both
models
assume
that
a
total
of
3.5
hours
of
labor
are
required
for
collection
and
analysis
of
each
sample
(
includes
both
lead
and
copper).
Burden
and
cost
summaries
for
the
baseline
model,
the
LCRMR
model,
and
the
difference
between
the
two
are
presented
after
the
monitoring
schedules.
The
differences
in
burden
and
costs
between
the
two
models
are
due
to
continued
monitoring
by
(
b)(
3)
systems,
monitoring
waivers,
and
accelerated
reduced
monitoring.
The
impact
of
allowing
systems
that
are
on
reduced
monitoring
to
collected
samples
during
other
than
the
summer
months
was
calculated
outside
this
model
and
is
not
included
in
the
summaries.
A
collection
burden
savings
of
5.5
hours
per
sample
was
assumed
for
each
system
that
was
impacted
by
this
revision
(
110
NTNCWSs
were
assumed
to
be
impacted
June
1999
D­
3
during
1999­
2001.)
June
1999
D­
4
BASELINE
LCR
TAP
MONITORING
SCHEDULE
­
Number
of
Samples
per
System
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
SCENARIO
1
­
Small
and
Medium
Systems
that
Do
Not
Exceed
25­
100
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
101­
500
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
501­
1K
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
1,001­
3.3K
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
3.3K­
10K
0
0
20
0
0
20
0
0
20
0
0
10K­
25K
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
25K­
50K
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
>
50K
Not
Applicable
SCENARIO
2a
­
Exceed>>
Install
Treatment>>
No
Longer
Exceed
(
Study
Required)

25­
100
10
5
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
0
101­
500
20
5
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
0
501­
1K
40
10
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
0
1K­
3.3K
40
10
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
0
3.3K­
10K
20
20
0
0
20
0
0
20
0
0
20
10K­
25K
30
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
25K­
50K
30
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
>
50K
Not
Applicable
SCENARIO
2b
­
Exceed>>
Install
Treatment>>
No
Longer
Exceed
(
No
Study
Required)

25­
100
5
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
101­
500
5
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
501­
1K
10
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
1K­
3.3K
10
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
3.3K­
10K
20
0
0
20
0
0
20
0
0
20
0
10K­
25K
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
25K­
50K
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
>
50K
Not
Applicable
SCENARIO
3a
­
Exceed>>
Install
Treatment>>
Still
Exceed
(
Study
Required)

25­
100
10
5
5
5
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
101­
500
20
10
10
5
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
501­
1K
40
20
20
10
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
1K­
3.3K
40
20
20
10
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
3.3K­
10K
40
40
20
20
0
0
20
0
0
20
0
10K­
25K
60
60
30
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
25K­
50K
60
60
30
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
50K­
75K
60
30
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
75K­
100K
60
30
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
June
1999
BASELINE
LCR
TAP
MONITORING
SCHEDULE
­
Number
of
Samples
per
System
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
D­
5
>
100K
100
50
50
0
0
50
0
0
50
0
0
SCENARIO
3b
­
Exceed>>
Install
Treatment>>
Still
Exceed
(
No
Study
Required)

25­
100
5
5
5
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
101­
500
10
10
5
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
501­
1K
20
20
10
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
1K­
3.3K
20
20
10
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
3.3K­
10K
20
20
0
0
20
0
0
20
0
0
20
10K­
25K
30
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
25K­
50K
30
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
>
50K
Not
Applicable
June
1999
D­
6
LCRMR
TAP
MONITORING
SCHEDULE
­
Number
of
Samples
per
System
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
SCENARIO
1
­
Small
and
Medium
Systems
that
Do
Not
Exceed
and
(
b)(
3)
Large
Systems
25­
100
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
101­
500
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
501­
1K
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
1K­
3.3K
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
3.3K­
10K
0
0
20
0
0
20
0
0
20
0
0
10K­
25K
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
25K­
50K
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
50K­
75K
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
75K­
100K
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
100K­
500K
0
50
0
0
50
0
0
50
0
0
50
500K­
1M
0
50
0
0
50
0
0
50
0
0
50
>
1M
0
50
0
0
50
0
0
50
0
0
50
SCENARIO
1R
­
Small
Systems
on
Monitoring
Waivers
25­
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
101­
500
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
501­
1K
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
1K­
3.3K
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
>
3.3K
Not
Applicable
SCENARIO
2a
­
Exceed>>
Install
Treatment>>
No
Longer
Exceed
(
Study
Required)

25­
100
10
5
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
0
101­
500
20
5
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
0
501­
1K
40
10
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
0
1K­
3.3K
40
10
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
0
3.3K­
10K
20
20
0
0
20
0
0
20
0
0
20
10K­
25K
30
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
25K­
50K
30
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
>
50K
Not
Applicable
SCENARIO
2aAR
­
Small
&
Medium
Systems
>>
Accelerated
Reduced
Monitoring
After
Treatment
(
Study
Required)

25­
100
10
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
101­
500
20
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
501­
1K
40
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
1K­
3.3K
40
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
3.3K­
10K
0
0
20
0
0
20
0
0
20
0
0
10K­
25K
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
25K­
50K
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
June
1999
LCRMR
TAP
MONITORING
SCHEDULE
­
Number
of
Samples
per
System
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
D­
7
>
50K
Not
Applicable
June
1999
LCRMR
TAP
MONITORING
SCHEDULE
­
Number
of
Samples
per
System
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
D­
8
SCENARIO
2b
­
Exceed>>
Install
Treatment>>
No
Longer
Exceed
(
No
Study
Required)

25­
100
5
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
101­
500
5
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
501­
1K
10
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
1K­
3.3K
10
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
3.3K­
10K
20
0
0
20
0
0
20
0
0
20
0
10K­
25K
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
25K­
50K
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
>
50K
Not
Applicable
SCENARIO
2bAR
­
Small
&
Medium
Systems>>
Accelerated
Reduced
Monitoring
After
Treatment
(
No
Study
Required)

25­
100
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
0
101­
500
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
0
501­
1K
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
0
1K­
3.3K
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
0
3.3K­
10K
0
0
20
0
0
20
0
0
20
0
0
10K­
25K
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
25K­
50K
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
>
50K
Not
Applicable
SCENARIO
3a
­
Exceed>>
Install
Treatment>>
Still
Exceed
(
Study
Required)

25­
100
10
5
5
5
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
101­
500
20
10
10
5
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
501­
1K
40
20
20
10
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
1K­
3.3K
40
20
20
10
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
3.3K­
10K
40
40
20
20
0
0
20
0
0
20
0
10K­
25K
60
60
30
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
25K­
50K
60
60
30
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
50K­
75K
60
30
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
75K­
100K
60
30
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
>
100K
100
50
50
0
0
50
0
0
50
0
0
Scenario
3aAR
­
Treat,
Then
enter
accelerated
Reduced
Monitoring
Schedule
25­
50K
Not
Applicable
50K­
75K
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
75K­
100K
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
100K­
500K
0
0
50
0
0
50
0
0
50
0
0
500K­
1M
0
0
50
0
0
50
0
0
50
0
0
>
1M
0
0
50
0
0
50
0
0
50
0
0
June
1999
LCRMR
TAP
MONITORING
SCHEDULE
­
Number
of
Samples
per
System
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
D­
9
SCENARIO
3b
­
Exceed>>
Install
Treatment>>
Still
Exceed
(
No
Study
Required)

25­
100
5
5
5
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
101­
500
10
10
5
5
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
501­
1K
20
20
10
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
1K­
3.3K
20
20
10
10
0
0
10
0
0
10
0
3.3K­
10K
20
20
0
0
20
0
0
20
0
0
20
10K­
25K
30
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
25K­
50K
30
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
0
0
30
>
50K
Not
Applicable
June
1999
D­
10
BASELINE
LCR
TAP
MONITORING
COST
ALL
WATER
SYSTEMS,
ALL
SCENARIOS,
All
$
Totals
in
thousands
System
Size
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
26,705
$
9,667
$
2,698
$
1,180
$
6,961
$
1,687
$
506
$
6,815
$
1,687
$
506
$
6,792
$
1,687
$
40,188
101­
500
24,486
10,559
3,090
1,236
6,381
1,547
464
6,248
1,547
464
6,227
1,547
39,307
501­
1K
7,911
6,820
1,996
798
4,122
999
299
4,029
999
299
4,022
999
25,382
1K­
3.3K
8,991
7,748
2,267
907
4,683
1,135
340
4,577
1,135
340
4,569
1,135
28,836
3.3K­
10K
4,324
1,678
789
4,838
985
593
4,740
988
593
4,740
985
593
21,522
10K­
25K
1,928
1,122
528
3,236
659
397
3,170
661
397
3,170
659
397
14,396
25K­
50K
865
502
237
1,451
293
180
1,423
294
180
1,423
293
180
6,456
50K­
75K
229
1,004
502
502
0
0
502
0
0
502
0
0
3,012
75K­
100K
91
399
200
200
0
0
200
0
0
200
0
0
1,197
100K­
500K
207
1,513
756
756
0
0
756
0
0
756
0
0
4,538
500K­
1M
24
175
88
88
0
0
88
0
0
88
0
0
526
>
1M
13
95
48
48
0
0
48
0
0
48
0
0
285
Total
75,774
41,282
13,198
15,238
24,084
6,538
12,534
23,612
6,538
12,534
23,547
6,538
$
185,676
BASELINE
LCR
TAP
MONITORING
BURDEN
ALL
WATER
SYSTEMS,
ALL
SCENARIOS,
Burden
in
hours
System
Size
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
26,705
503,683
140,550
61,475
363,255
87,925
26,368
354,460
87,925
26,368
354,460
87,925
2,094,392
101­
500
24,486
550,083
160,978
64,388
332,993
80,590
24,153
324,933
80,590
24,153
324,933
80,590
2,048,381
501­
1K
7,911
355,270
103,990
41,580
214,902
52,050
15,575
209,687
52,050
15,575
209,687
52,050
1,322,417
1K­
3.3K
8,991
403,620
118,095
47,215
244,141
59,120
17,710
238,225
59,120
17,710
238,226
59,120
1,502,301
3.3K­
10K
4,324
80,360
37,800
231,700
47,243
28,420
227,010
47,243
28,420
227,010
47,243
28,420
1,030,869
10K­
25K
1,928
53,760
25,305
154,980
31,602
19,005
151,830
31,602
19,005
151,830
31,602
19,005
689,526
25K­
50K
865
24,045
11,340
69,510
14,069
8,610
68,145
14,069
8,610
68,145
14,069
8,610
309,221
50K­
75K
229
48,090
24,045
24,045
0
0
24,045
0
0
24,045
0
0
144,269
75K­
100K
91
19,110
9,555
9,555
0
0
9,555
0
0
9,555
0
0
57,330
100K­
500K
207
72,450
36,225
36,225
0
0
36,225
0
0
36,225
0
0
217,349
500K­
1M
24
8,400
4,200
4,200
0
0
4,200
0
0
4,200
0
0
25,200
>
1M
13
4,550
2,275
2,275
0
0
2,275
0
0
2,275
0
0
13,650
Total
75,774
2,123,420
674,358
747,148
1,248,203
335,720
607,090
1,220,218
335,720
607,090
1,220,218
335,720
9,454,904
June
1999
D­
11
LCRMR
TAP
MONITORING
COST
ALL
WATER
SYSTEMS,
ALL
SCENARIOS,
All
$
Totals
in
thousands
System
Size
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
26,704
$
8,344
$
2,153
$
1,446
$
6,191
$
1,279
$
773
$
6,920
$
1,279
$
773
$
6,023
$
1,279
$
36,460
101­
500
24,486
9,347
2,592
1,481
5,676
1,172
710
6,345
1,172
710
5,522
1,172
35,899
501­
1K
7,912
6,042
1,675
958
3,669
758
458
4,100
758
458
3,569
758
23,203
1K­
3.3K
8,991
6,867
1,904
1,088
4,169
861
521
4,659
861
521
4,055
861
26,368
3.3K­
10K
4,324
1,362
710
5,153
750
514
5,055
750
514
5,055
750
514
21,129
10K­
25K
1,928
912
476
3,446
502
344
3,380
502
344
3,380
502
344
14,133
25K­
50K
864
410
215
1,546
226
153
1,515
226
153
1,515
226
153
6,338
50K­
75K
289
802
533
502
0
132
502
0
132
502
0
132
3,236
75K­
100K
117
320
217
199
0
57
199
0
57
199
0
57
1,307
100K­
500K
286
1,213
895
756
0
289
756
0
289
756
0
289
5,243
500K­
1M
28
139
84
88
0
15
88
0
15
88
0
15
530
>
1M
15
80
47
47
0
7
47
0
7
47
0
7
292
Total
75,944
35,839
11,502
16,711
21,183
5,582
14,006
23,502
5,582
14,006
20,646
5,582
$
174,138
LCRMR
TAP
MONITORING
BURDEN
ALL
WATER
SYSTEMS,
ALL
SCENARIOS,
Burden
in
hours
System
Size
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
26,704
434,630
112,158
75,338
322,473
66,605
40,285
360,430
66,605
40,285
313,705
66,605
1,899,118
101­
500
24,486
486,868
134,995
77,140
295,663
61,058
36,960
330,488
61,058
36,960
287,630
61,058
1,869,875
501­
1K
7,912
314,720
87,255
49,875
191,100
39,480
23,870
213,570
39,480
23,870
185,885
39,480
1,208,585
1K­
3.3K
8,991
357,665
99,190
56,665
217,140
44,870
27,125
242,690
44,870
27,125
211,225
44,870
1,373,435
3.3K­
10K
4,324
65,240
34,020
246,820
35,910
24,640
242,130
35,910
24,640
242,130
35,910
24,640
1,011,990
10K­
25K
1,928
43,680
22,785
165,060
24,045
16,485
161,910
24,045
16,485
161,910
24,045
16,485
676,935
25K­
50K
864
19,635
10,290
74,025
10,815
7,350
72,555
10,815
7,350
72,555
10,815
7,350
303,555
50K­
75K
289
38,430
25,515
24,045
0
6,300
24,045
0
6,300
24,045
0
6,300
154,980
75K­
100K
117
15,330
10,395
9,555
0
2,730
9,555
0
2,730
9,555
0
2,730
62,580
100K­
500K
286
58,100
42,875
36,225
0
13,825
36,225
0
13,825
36,225
0
13,825
251,125
500K­
1M
28
6,650
4,025
4,200
0
700
4,200
0
700
4,200
0
700
25,375
>
1M
15
3,850
2,275
2,275
0
350
2,275
0
350
2,275
0
350
14,000
Total
75,944
1,844,798
585,778
821,223
1,097,145
284,393
681,135
1,217,948
284,393
681,135
1,069,215
284,393
8,851,553
June
1999
D­
12
LCR
TAP
MONITORING
DIFFERENCE
IN
COST:
LCRMR
minus
Baseline
Model
ALL
WATER
SYSTEMS,
ALL
SCENARIOS,
All
$
Totals
in
thousands
System
Size
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
26,704
­$
1,323
­$
544
$
266
­$
793
­$
409
$
267
$
127
­$
409
$
267
­$
792
­$
409
­$
3,750
101­
500
24,486
­
1,211
­
498
245
­
726
­
374
246
118
­
374
246
­
725
­
374
­
3,429
501­
1K
7,912
­
778
­
321
159
­
460
­
241
159
78
­
241
159
­
460
­
241
­
2,186
1K­
3.3K
8,991
­
881
­
363
181
­
522
­
273
181
90
­
273
181
­
522
­
273
­
2,475
3.3K­
10K
4,324
­
316
­
79
316
­
239
­
79
316
­
235
­
79
316
­
239
­
79
­
396
10K­
25K
1,928
­
210
­
53
210
­
159
­
53
210
­
157
­
53
210
­
159
­
53
­
264
25K­
50K
864
­
92
­
22
94
­
68
­
26
92
­
68
­
26
92
­
68
­
26
­
119
50K­
75K
289
­
202
31
0
0
132
0
0
132
0
0
132
224
75K­
100K
117
­
79
18
0
0
57
0
0
57
0
0
57
110
100K­
500K
286
­
300
139
0
0
289
0
0
289
0
0
289
705
500K­
1M
28
­
37
­
4
0
0
15
0
0
15
0
0
15
4
>
1M
15
­
15
0
0
0
7
0
0
7
0
0
7
7
Total
75,944
­
5,443
­
1,696
1,473
­
2,967
­
956
1,472
­
45
­
956
1,472
­
2,966
­
956
­$
11,538
LCR
TAP
MONITORING
DIFFERENCE
IN
BURDEN:
LCRMR
minus
Baseline
Model
ALL
WATER
SYSTEMS,
ALL
SCENARIOS,
Burden
in
hours
System
Size
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
26,704
­
69,053
­
28,393
13,863
­
40,868
­
21,320
13,918
5,885
­
21,320
13,918
­
40,840
­
21,320
­
195,531
101­
500
24,486
­
63,215
­
25,983
12,753
­
37,409
­
19,533
12,808
5,475
­
19,533
12,808
­
37,382
­
19,533
­
178,744
501­
1K
7,912
­
40,550
­
16,735
8,295
­
23,828
­
12,570
8,295
3,857
­
12,570
8,295
­
23,828
­
12,570
­
113,908
1K­
3.3K
8,991
­
45,955
­
18,905
9,450
­
27,029
­
14,250
9,415
4,435
­
14,250
9,415
­
27,029
­
14,250
­
128,954
3.3K­
10K
4,324
­
15,120
­
3,780
15,120
­
11,347
­
3,780
15,120
­
11,347
­
3,780
15,120
­
11,347
­
3,780
­
18,921
10K­
25K
1,928
­
10,080
­
2,520
10,080
­
7,563
­
2,520
10,080
­
7,563
­
2,520
10,080
­
7,563
­
2,520
­
12,609
25K­
50K
864
­
4,410
­
1,050
4,515
­
3,256
­
1,260
4,410
­
3,256
­
1,260
4,410
­
3,256
­
1,260
­
5,674
50K­
75K
289
­
9,660
1,470
0
0
6,300
0
0
6,300
0
0
6,300
10,709
75K­
100K
117
­
3,780
840
0
0
2,730
0
0
2,730
0
0
2,730
5,250
100K­
500K
286
­
14,350
6,650
0
0
13,825
0
0
13,825
0
0
13,825
33,774
500K­
1M
28
­
1,750
­
175
0
0
700
0
0
700
0
0
700
175
>
1M
15
­
700
0
0
0
350
0
0
350
0
0
350
350
Total
75,944
­
278,623
­
88,580
74,075
­
151,302
­
51,328
74,045
­
2,515
­
51,328
74,045
­
151,247
­
51,328
­
604,084
June
1999
D­
13
WATER
QUALITY
PARAMETER
MONITORING
MODELS
The
baseline
and
revised
Water
Quality
Parameter
Monitoring
Schedules,
for
both
Tap
and
Entry
Point
sampling
present
the
total
number
of
samples
per
year
during
1999
­
2009
for
each
system
for
each
of
the
possible
monitoring
scenarios.
In
the
baseline
model,
systems
are
assigned
to
one
of
four
possible
monitoring
scenarios
that
are
dependent
on
whether
or
not
the
system:
exceeds
the
action
level
during
initial
monitoring,
is
required
to
conduct
a
study,
and
continues
to
exceed
after
treatment.
The
four
possible
monitoring
scenarios
are:

°
Scenario
1:
Small
and
medium
systems
that
are
below
the
action
level
and
large
(
b)(
3)
systems.
°
Scenario
2:
Small
and
medium
systems
that
exceed
the
action
level
and
no
longer
exceed
after
the
installation
CCT.
°
Scenario
3a:
Systems
that
exceed
the
action
level,
are
required
to
conduct
a
corrosion
control
study,
and
continue
to
exceed
after
the
installation
of
CCT.
°
Scenario
3b:
Small
and
medium
systems
that
exceed
the
action
level
during
initial
monitoring,
are
not
required
to
conduct
a
study,
and
continue
to
exceed
after
the
installation
of
CCT.

Note:
Any
exceedance
is
assumed
to
occur
during
the
initial
round
of
monitoring.

Under
the
LCRMR
model,
large
systems
that
qualify
for
accelerated
reduced
monitoring
are
included
under
a
separate
Scenario
3aAR.
By
1999,
only
systems
in
Scenario
3a,
3a­
A,
and
3b
are
assumed
to
be
collecting
water
quality
parameter
(
WQP)
samples.
All
systems
are
assumed
to
have
treatment
in
place
and
small
and
medium
systems
that
are
below
the
action
level
(
i.
e.,
Scenarios1
and
2)
are
not
required
to
conduct
WQP
monitoring.
Further,
none
of
the
171
large
(
b)(
3)
systems
were
assumed
to
monitor
beyond
the
initial
WQP
monitoring
that
was
required
in
1992.

An
entry
point
and
WQP
tap
monitoring
schedule
for
Scenarios
3a,
3a­
A,
and
3b
are
provided
immediately
following
this
introduction.
Because
the
number
of
entry
points
varies
by
water
source,
a
separate
entry
point
monitoring
schedule
is
provided
for
ground
water
and
surface
water
systems.

Both
the
baseline
and
revised
estimates
assume
that
laboratory
costs
are
$
40
per
tap
WQP
sample
analysis,
and
$
25
each
for
entry
point
sample
analysis.
This
analytical
cost
assumes
that
all
analyses
are
conducted
in­
house.
In
addition,
both
models
assume
that
a
total
of
2
hours
of
labor
are
required
for
analysis
of
each
tap
WQP
sample.
However,
WQP
collection
burden
is
assumed
to
be
applicable
to
only
those
systems
that
chlorinate
only
or
apply
no
treatment
(
i.
e.,
80%
of
ground
water
systems,
based
on
treatment
information
in
SDWIS)
and
is
0.5
hours
per
entry
point.
An
additional
burden
of
0.5
hours
is
applied
to
all
systems
for
entry
point
sample
analysis.
Burden
and
cost
summaries
for
the
baseline
model,
LCRMR
model,
and
the
difference
between
the
two
models
are
presented
after
the
monitoring
schedules.
The
difference
in
costs
between
the
two
models
is
due
to
accelerated
reduced
monitoring
and
the
collection
of
entry
point
samples
at
representative
entry
points
by
medium
and
large
ground
water
systems.
June
1999
D­
14
BASELINE
LCR
WQP
MONITORING
SCHEDULE
­
Number
of
Samples
per
System
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
SCENARIO
3a
­
Exceed
After
Treat
&
Study
Required,
Entry
Point
Monitoring
GROUND
25­
100
31.2
15.6
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
101­
500
39
19.5
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
501­
1K
49.4
24.7
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
1K­
3.3K
62.4
31.2
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
3.3K­
10K
49.4
98.8
98.8
98.8
98.8
98.8
98.8
98.8
98.8
98.8
98.8
10K­
25K
97.5
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
25K­
50K
97.5
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
50K­
75K
353.6
353.6
353.6
353.6
353.6
353.6
353.6
353.6
353.6
353.6
353.6
75K­
100K
499.2
499.2
499.2
499.2
499.2
499.2
499.2
499.2
499.2
499.2
499.2
100K­
500K
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
500K­
1M
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
>
1M
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
943.8
SURFACE
25­
100
33.8
16.9
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
101­
500
41.6
20.8
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
501­
1K
49.4
24.7
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
1K­
3.3K
49.4
24.7
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
3.3K­
10K
22.1
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
10K­
25K
24.7
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
25K­
50K
24.7
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
50K­
75K
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
75K­
100K
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
100K­
500K
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
500K­
1M
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
>
1M
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
SCENARIO
3a
­
Exceed
After
Treat
&
Study
Required,
Tap
Monitoring
GROUND
or
SURFACE
25­
100
4
2
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
101­
500
4
2
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
501­
1K
8
4
8
8
4
4
4
4
4
1K­
3.3K
8
4
8
8
4
4
4
4
4
3.3K­
10K
6
12
12
6
6
6
6
6
10K­
25K
20
34
28
14
14
14
14
14
25K­
50K
20
34
28
14
14
14
14
14
50K­
75K
34
28
14
14
14
14
14
75K­
100K
34
28
14
14
14
14
14
100K­
500K
70
40
20
20
20
20
20
500K­
1M
70
40
20
20
20
20
20
>
1M
70
40
20
20
20
20
20
June
1999
BASELINE
LCR
WQP
MONITORING
SCHEDULE
­
Number
of
Samples
per
System
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
D­
15
SCENARIO
3b
­
Exceed
After
Treat
&
No
Study,
Entry
Point
Monitoring
GROUND
25­
100
15.6
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
101­
500
19.5
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
501­
1K
24.7
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
1K­
3.3K
31.2
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
3.3K­
10K
98.8
98.8
98.8
98.8
98.8
98.8
98.8
98.8
98.8
98.8
98.8
10K­
25K
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
25K­
50K
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
>
50K
Not
Applicable
SURFACE
25­
100
16.9
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
101­
500
20.8
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
501­
1K
24.7
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
1K­
3.3K
24.7
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
3.3K­
10K
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
10K­
25K
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
25K­
50K
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
>
50K
Not
Applicable
SCENARIO
3b
­
Exceed
After
Treat
&
No
Study,
Tap
Monitoring
GROUND
or
SURFACE
25­
100
2
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
101­
500
2
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
501­
1K
4
8
8
4
4
4
4
4
1K­
3.3K
4
8
8
4
4
4
4
4
3.3K­
10K
12
12
6
6
6
6
6
10K­
25K
28
28
14
14
14
14
14
25K­
50K
28
28
14
14
14
14
14
>
50K
Not
Applicable
June
1999
D­
16
LCRMR
WQP
MONITORING
SCHEDULE
­
Number
of
Samples
per
System
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
SCENARIO
3a
­
Exceed
After
Treat
&
Study
Required,
Entry
Point
Monitoring
GROUND
25­
100
31.2
15.6
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
101­
500
39
19.5
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
501­
1K
49.4
24.7
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
1K­
3.3K
62.4
31.2
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
3.3K­
10K
24.7
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
10K­
25K
48.75
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
25K­
50K
48.75
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
50K­
75K
235.7
235.7
235.7
235.7
235.7
235.7
235.7
235.7
235.7
235.7
235.7
75K­
100K
332.8
332.8
332.8
332.8
332.8
332.8
332.8
332.8
332.8
332.8
332.8
100K­
500K
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
500K­
1M
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
>
1M
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
SURFACE
25­
100
33.8
16.9
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
101­
500
41.6
20.8
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
501­
1K
49.4
24.7
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
1K­
3.3K
49.4
24.7
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
3.3K­
10K
22.1
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
10K­
25K
24.7
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
25K­
50K
24.7
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
50K­
75K
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
75K­
100K
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
100K­
500K
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
500K­
1M
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
>
1M
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
SCENARIO
3a
­
Exceed
After
Treat
&
Study
Required,
Entry
Point
Monitoring
GROUND
or
SURFACE
25­
100
4
2
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
101­
500
4
2
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
501­
1K
8
4
8
8
4
4
4
4
4
1K­
3.3K
8
4
8
8
4
4
4
4
4
3.3K­
10K
6
12
12
6
6
6
6
6
10K­
25K
20
34
28
14
14
14
14
14
25K­
50K
20
34
28
14
14
14
14
14
50K­
75K
34
28
14
14
14
14
14
75K­
100K
34
28
14
14
14
14
14
100K­
500K
70
40
20
20
20
20
20
500K­
1M
70
40
20
20
20
20
20
>
1M
70
40
20
20
20
20
20
June
1999
LCRMR
WQP
MONITORING
SCHEDULE
­
Number
of
Samples
per
System
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
D­
17
SCENARIO
3a­
A:
Exceed
After
Treat
&
Study
Required
(
Accelerated
Reduced
Schedule
­­
Entry
Point
Monitoring)

GROUND
<
50K
Not
Applicable
50K­
75K
235.7
235.7
235.7
235.7
235.7
235.7
235.7
235.7
235.7
235.7
235.7
75K­
100K
332.8
332.8
332.8
332.8
332.8
332.8
332.8
332.8
332.8
332.8
332.8
100K­
500K
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
500K­
1M
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
>
1M
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
629.2
SURFACE
<
50K
Not
Applicable
50K­
75K
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
122.2
75K­
100K
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
75.4
100K­
500K
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
500K­
1M
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
>
1M
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
88.4
SCENARIO
3a­
A:
Exceed
After
Treat
&
Study
Required
(
Accelerated
Reduced
Schedule
­­
Tap
Monitoring)

GROUND
or
SURFACE
<
50K
Not
Applicable
50K­
75K
20
14
14
14
75K­
100K
20
14
14
14
100K­
500K
50
20
20
20
500K­
1M
50
20
20
20
>
1M
50
20
20
20
SCENARIO
3b
­
Exceed
After
Treat
&
No
Study,
Entry
Point
Monitoring
GROUND
25­
100
15.6
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
101­
500
19.5
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
501­
1K
24.7
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
1K­
3.3K
31.2
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
62.4
3.3K­
10K
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
10K­
25K
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
25K­
50K
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
>
50K
Not
Applicable
SURFACE
25­
100
16.9
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.8
101­
500
20.8
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
41.6
501­
1K
24.7
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
1K­
3.3K
24.7
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
3.3K­
10K
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
44.2
10K­
25K
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
25K­
50K
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
49.4
>
50K
Not
Applicable
June
1999
LCRMR
WQP
MONITORING
SCHEDULE
­
Number
of
Samples
per
System
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
D­
18
SCENARIO
3b
­
Exceed
After
Treat
&
No
Study,
Tap
Monitoring
GROUND
or
SURFACE
25­
100
2
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
101­
500
2
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
501­
1K
4
8
8
4
4
4
4
4
1K­
3.3K
4
8
8
4
4
4
4
4
3.3K­
10K
12
12
6
6
6
6
6
10K­
25K
28
28
14
14
14
14
14
25K­
50K
28
28
14
14
14
14
14
>
50K
Not
Applicable
June
1999
D­
19
BASELINE
LCR
WQP
MONITORING
COST
ALL
WATER
SYSTEMS,
ALL
SCENARIOS,
All
$
Totals
in
thousands
System
Size
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
8,012
$
1,940
$
2,716
$
3,104
$
2,881
$
2,807
$
2,807
$
2,807
$
2,584
$
2,510
$
2,733
$
2,584
$
29,473
101­
500
7,346
2,130
2,983
3,409
3,204
3,136
3,136
3,136
2,932
2,863
3,068
2,932
32,929
501­
1K
2,375
941
1,316
1,505
1,373
1,328
1,328
1,328
1,196
1,152
1,284
1,196
13,948
1K­
3.3K
2,698
1,210
1,693
1,936
1,786
1,735
1,735
1,735
1,585
1,535
1,685
1,585
18,222
3.3K­
10K
1,081
940
1,073
979
948
948
853
853
916
822
853
916
10,101
10K­
25K
483
764
871
758
725
725
627
627
693
594
627
693
7,703
25K­
50K
218
322
368
317
302
302
258
258
287
242
258
287
3,200
50K­
75K
289
2,405
2,299
2,050
2,050
2,050
2,050
1,801
1,801
2,050
1,801
1,801
22,158
75K­
100K
117
953
910
811
811
811
811
713
713
811
713
713
8,770
100K­
500K
286
3,433
2,951
2,630
2,630
2,630
2,630
2,309
2,309
2,630
2,309
2,309
28,772
500K­
1M
28
386
330
293
293
293
293
256
256
293
256
256
3,202
>
1M
15
147
116
96
96
96
96
76
76
96
76
76
1,048
Total
22,948
15,572
17,627
17,888
17,099
16,862
16,625
15,898
15,347
15,599
15,662
15,347
179,527
BASELINE
LCR
WQP
MONITORING
BURDEN
ALL
WATER
SYSTEMS,
ALL
SCENARIOS,
Burden
in
hours
System
Size
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
8,012
44,339
62,067
70,938
64,930
62,926
62,926
62,926
56,918
54,914
60,922
56,918
660,723
101­
500
7,346
47,942
67,131
76,715
71,203
69,367
69,367
69,367
63,855
62,019
67,531
63,855
728,353
501­
1K
2,375
21,236
29,700
33,957
30,397
29,205
29,205
29,205
25,645
24,453
28,013
25,645
306,661
1K­
3.3K
2,698
26,661
37,294
42,636
38,588
37,236
37,236
37,236
33,188
31,836
35,884
33,188
390,984
3.3K­
10K
1,081
20,090
22,938
20,502
19,698
19,698
17,262
17,262
18,894
16,458
17,262
18,894
208,956
10K­
25K
483
16,831
19,173
16,265
15,425
15,425
12,877
12,877
14,585
12,037
12,877
14,585
162,954
25K­
50K
218
7,058
8,075
6,759
6,367
6,367
5,219
5,219
5,975
4,827
5,219
5,975
67,059
50K­
75K
289
49,878
47,130
40,718
40,718
40,718
40,718
34,306
34,306
40,718
34,306
34,306
437,822
75K­
100K
117
20,320
19,228
16,680
16,680
16,680
16,680
14,132
14,132
16,680
14,132
14,132
179,474
100K­
500K
286
75,170
62,750
54,470
54,470
54,470
54,470
46,190
46,190
54,470
46,190
46,190
595,025
500K­
1M
28
8,447
7,007
6,047
6,047
6,047
6,047
5,087
5,087
6,047
5,087
5,087
66,036
>
1M
15
3,200
2,420
1,900
1,900
1,900
1,900
1,380
1,380
1,900
1,380
1,380
20,638
Total
22,948
341,170
384,911
387,585
366,421
360,037
353,905
335,185
320,153
326,357
328,801
320,153
3,824,683
June
1999
D­
20
LCRMR
WQP
MONITORING
COST
ALL
WATER
SYSTEMS,
ALL
SCENARIOS,
COSTS,
All
$
Totals
in
thousands
System
Size
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
8,012
$
1,940
$
2,716
$
3,104
$
2,881
$
2,807
$
2,807
$
2,807
$
2,584
$
2,510
$
2,733
$
2,584
$
29,473
101­
500
7,346
2,130
2,983
3,409
3,204
3,136
3,136
3,136
2,932
2,863
3,068
2,932
32,929
501­
1K
2,375
941
1,316
1,505
1,373
1,328
1,328
1,328
1,196
1,152
1,284
1,196
13,948
1K­
3.3K
2,698
1,210
1,693
1,936
1,786
1,735
1,735
1,735
1,585
1,535
1,685
1,585
18,222
3.3K­
10K
1,081
655
748
654
623
623
528
528
591
497
528
591
6,566
10K­
25K
483
550
626
513
480
480
381
381
448
349
381
448
5,037
25K­
50K
218
240
274
223
208
208
164
164
193
148
164
193
2,179
50K­
75K
289
1,965
1,808
1,610
1,660
1,627
1,610
1,461
1,411
1,610
1,461
1,411
17,632
75K­
100K
117
752
690
611
630
616
611
551
531
611
551
531
6,683
100K­
500K
286
2,763
2,218
1,960
2,024
1,974
1,960
1,766
1,703
1,960
1,766
1,703
21,796
500K­
1M
28
312
249
219
227
221
219
197
190
219
197
190
2,440
>
1M
15
130
97
80
83
80
80
66
63
80
66
63
888
Total
22,948
13,589
15,418
15,823
15,178
14,835
14,559
14,121
13,426
13,533
13,884
13,426
157,792
LCRMR
WQP
MONITORING
BURDEN
ALL
WATER
SYSTEMS,
ALL
SCENARIOS,
Burden
in
hours
System
Size
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
8,012
44,339
62,067
70,938
64,930
62,926
62,926
62,926
56,918
54,914
60,922
56,918
660,723
101­
500
7,346
47,942
67,131
76,715
71,203
69,367
69,367
69,367
63,855
62,019
67,531
63,855
728,353
501­
1K
2,375
21,236
29,700
33,957
30,397
29,205
29,205
29,205
25,645
24,453
28,013
25,645
306,661
1K­
3.3K
2,698
26,661
37,294
42,636
38,588
37,236
37,236
37,236
33,188
31,836
35,884
33,188
390,984
3.3K­
10K
1,081
13,977
15,958
13,522
12,718
12,718
10,282
10,282
11,914
9,478
10,282
11,914
133,040
10K­
25K
483
12,224
13,908
11,000
10,160
10,160
7,612
7,612
9,320
6,772
7,612
9,320
105,697
25K­
50K
218
5,303
6,057
4,741
4,349
4,349
3,201
3,201
3,957
2,809
3,201
3,957
45,121
50K­
75K
289
40,207
36,171
31,047
32,335
31,047
31,047
27,211
25,923
31,047
27,211
25,923
339,172
75K­
100K
117
15,922
14,326
12,282
12,786
12,282
12,282
10,742
10,238
12,282
10,742
10,238
134,122
100K­
500K
286
60,505
46,445
39,805
41,445
39,805
39,805
34,805
33,165
39,805
34,805
33,165
443,556
500K­
1M
28
6,831
5,191
4,431
4,631
4,431
4,431
3,871
3,671
4,431
3,871
3,671
49,463
>
1M
15
2,837
1,977
1,537
1,617
1,537
1,537
1,177
1,097
1,537
1,177
1,097
17,123
Total
22,948
297,983
336,224
342,610
325,158
315,062
308,930
297,634
278,890
281,382
291,250
278,890
3,354,016
June
1999
D­
21
WQP
MONITORING
DIFFERENCE
IN
COST:
LCRMR
minus
Baseline
Model
ALL
WATER
SYSTEMS,
ALL
SCENARIOS,
All
$
Totals
in
thousands
System
Size
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
8,012
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
101­
500
7,346
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
501­
1K
2,375
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1K­
3.3K
2,698
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.3K­
10K
1,081
­
285
­
325
­
325
­
325
­
325
­
325
­
325
­
325
­
325
­
325
­
325
­
3,535
10K­
25K
483
­
215
­
245
­
245
­
245
­
245
­
245
­
245
­
245
­
245
­
245
­
245
­
2,666
25K­
50K
218
­
82
­
94
­
94
­
94
­
94
­
94
­
94
­
94
­
94
­
94
­
94
­
1,022
50K­
75K
289
­
440
­
490
­
440
­
390
­
423
­
440
­
340
­
390
­
440
­
340
­
390
­
4,526
75K­
100K
117
­
201
­
220
­
201
­
181
­
195
­
201
­
162
­
181
­
201
­
162
­
181
­
2,087
100K­
500K
286
­
670
­
734
­
670
­
607
­
656
­
670
­
543
­
607
­
670
­
543
­
607
­
6,976
500K­
1M
28
­
74
­
81
­
74
­
66
­
72
­
74
­
58
­
66
­
74
­
58
­
66
­
762
>
1M
15
­
16
­
19
­
16
­
13
­
16
­
16
­
10
­
13
­
16
­
10
­
13
­
161
Total
22,948
­
1,982
­
2,210
­
2,066
­
1,922
­
2,027
­
2,066
­
1,778
­
1,922
­
2,066
­
1,778
­
1,922
­
21,735
WQP
MONITORING
DIFFERENCE
IN
BURDEN:
LCRMR
minus
Baseline
Model
ALL
WATER
SYSTEMS,
ALL
SCENARIOS,
Burden
in
hours
System
Size
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
8,012
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
101­
500
7,346
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
501­
1K
2,375
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1K­
3.3K
2,698
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.3K­
10K
1,081
­
6,113
­
6,980
­
6,980
­
6,980
­
6,980
­
6,980
­
6,980
­
6,980
­
6,980
­
6,980
­
6,980
­
75,915
10K­
25K
483
­
4,607
­
5,265
­
5,265
­
5,265
­
5,265
­
5,265
­
5,265
­
5,265
­
5,265
­
5,265
­
5,265
­
57,257
25K­
50K
218
­
1,755
­
2,018
­
2,018
­
2,018
­
2,018
­
2,018
­
2,018
­
2,018
­
2,018
­
2,018
­
2,018
­
21,938
50K­
75K
289
­
9,671
­
10,959
­
9,671
­
8,383
­
9,671
­
9,671
­
7,095
­
8,383
­
9,671
­
7,095
­
8,383
­
98,650
75K­
100K
117
­
4,398
­
4,902
­
4,398
­
3,894
­
4,398
­
4,398
­
3,390
­
3,894
­
4,398
­
3,390
­
3,894
­
45,351
100K­
500K
286
­
14,664
­
16,304
­
14,664
­
13,024
­
14,664
­
14,664
­
11,384
­
13,024
­
14,664
­
11,384
­
13,024
­
151,469
500K­
1M
28
­
1,616
­
1,816
­
1,616
­
1,416
­
1,616
­
1,616
­
1,216
­
1,416
­
1,616
­
1,216
­
1,416
­
16,573
>
1M
15
­
363
­
443
­
363
­
283
­
363
­
363
­
203
­
283
­
363
­
203
­
283
­
3,515
Total
22,948
­
43,187
­
48,687
­
44,975
­
41,263
­
44,975
­
44,975
­
37,551
­
41,263
­
44,975
­
37,551
­
41,263
­
470,667
June
1999
D­
22
SOURCE
WATER
MONITORING
MODELS
The
Baseline
and
LCRMR
Source
Water
Monitoring
Schedules,
for
source
water
entry
point
sampling
present
the
total
number
of
sampling
events
per
year
during
1999
­
2009
for
each
system
for
each
of
the
possible
monitoring
schedules.
In
both
the
baseline
and
LCRMR
models,
systems
are
assigned
to
one
of
seven
possible
monitoring
scenarios
that
are
dependent
on
whether
or
not
the
system:
exceeds
an
action
level
during
initial
monitoring,
is
required
to
conduct
a
corrosion
control
study,
is
required
to
install
source
water
treatment,
and
continues
to
exceed
after
the
treatment.
The
seven
monitoring
scenarios
are:

°
Scenario
1:
Large
(
b)(
3)
systems.
[
Note:
Small
and
medium
systems
that
are
below
the
action
level
are
not
included
in
the
model.]
°
Scenario
2a:
Systems
that
exceed
the
action
level,
are
not
required
to
install
source
water
treatment
(
SOWT),
and
continue
to
exceed
after
treatment
°
Scenario
2b:
Systems
that
exceed
the
action
level,
are
not
required
to
install
SOWT,
are
required
to
conduct
a
study,
and
no
longer
exceed
after
treatment
°
Scenario
2c:
Small
and
medium
systems
that
exceed
the
action
level,
are
not
required
to
install
SOWT,
are
not
required
to
conduct
a
study,
and
no
longer
exceed
after
treatment
°
Scenario
3a:
Systems
that
exceed
the
action
level,
are
required
to
install
SOWT,
and
continue
to
exceed
after
treatment
°
Scenario
3b:
Systems
that
exceed
the
action
level,
are
required
to
install
SOWT,
are
required
to
conduct
a
study,
and
no
longer
exceed
after
treatment
°
Scenario
3c:
Small
and
medium
systems
that
exceed
the
action
level,
are
required
to
install
SOWT,
are
not
required
to
conduct
a
study,
and
no
longer
exceed
after
treatment
Note:
Any
exceedance
is
assumed
to
occur
during
the
initial
round
of
monitoring.
All
systems
exceeding
the
action
level
are
assumed
to
install
corrosion
control
treatment.

For
each
of
the
scenarios
in
which
the
system
no
longer
exceeds
after
treatment
(
2b,
2c,
3b,
and
3c),
the
model
assumes
that
by
1999
these
systems
would
no
longer
be
conducting
source
water
monitoring.
The
source
water
monitoring
schedules
for
the
remaining
three
scenarios
are
provided
immediately
following
this
introduction.
Because
the
number
of
entry
points
varies
by
water
source,
a
separate
monitoring
schedule
is
provided
for
ground
water
and
surface
water
systems.

Both
the
baseline
and
LCRMR
estimates
assume
that:
systems
will
composite
samples,
all
analyses
are
conducted
by
the
system,
the
analytical
burden
is
1
hour,
and
the
non­
labor
analytical
cost
for
materials
is
$
7.31
to
conduct
both
lead
and
copper.
The
commercial
fee
of
$
30
was
adjusted
to
eliminate
the
labor
component
to
avoid
double
counting
of
labor
(
i.
e.,
$
30
­
$
22.69).
No
collection
burden
is
estimated
because
by
1999
all
systems
are
assumed
to
be
monitoring
at
least
annually
and
that
lead
and
copper
source
water
samples
are
collected
with
other
inorganic
chemicals,
such
as
nitrate.
In
addition,
sample
collection
for
large,
medium,
small
is
assumed
to
follow
the
standardized
monitoring
framework
under
the
Phase
II/
V
rules
and
scheduling
for
monitoring
is
assumed
to
be
based
on
system
size.
States
are
assumed
to
require
different
size
systems
to
monitor
during
different
years
of
the
compliance
period
or
cycle
to
better
balance
laboratory
workload.
Large
systems
are
assumed
to
monitor
in
the
first
year
of
the
compliance
period
or
cycle,
medium
systems
in
the
second
year
of
the
compliance
period
or
fifth
year
of
the
compliance
cycle,
and
small
systems
in
the
last
year
of
the
compliance
period
or
cycle.
June
1999
D­
23
Burden
and
cost
summaries
for
the
baseline
model,
the
LCRMR
model,
and
the
difference
between
the
two
are
presented
after
the
monitoring
schedules.
The
differences
in
burden
and
costs
between
the
two
models
are
due
to
the
LCRMR
provision
that
allows
systems
with
low
source
water
lead
and
copper
levels
that
exceed
the
action
level
to
reduce
the
frequency
with
which
they
collect
source
water
samples.
June
1999
D­
24
BASELINE
LCR
SOURCE
WATER
MONITORING
SCHEDULE
­
Number
of
Samples
per
System
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
SCENARIO
1
­
b3
Systems
GROUND
<
50K
Not
Applicable
50K­
75K
0
13.3
0
0
13.3
0
0
13.3
0
0
13.3
75K­
100K
0
18.8
0
0
18.8
0
0
18.8
0
0
18.8
100K­
500K
0
35.6
0
0
35.6
0
0
35.6
0
0
35.6
500K­
1M
0
36.3
0
0
36.3
0
0
36.3
0
0
36.3
>
1M
0
36
0
0
36
0
0
36
0
0
36
SURFACE
<
50K
Not
Applicable
50K­
75K
0
4.6
0
0
4.6
0
0
4.6
0
0
4.6
75K­
100K
0
2.9
0
0
2.9
0
0
2.9
0
0
2.9
100K­
500K
0
3.3
0
0
3.3
0
0
3.3
0
0
3.3
500K­
1M
0
3.3
0
0
3.3
0
0
3.3
0
0
3.3
>
1M
0
3.4
0
0
3.4
0
0
3.4
0
0
3.4
SCENARIO
2a
­­
PWSs>
AL,
Not
Required
to
Install
SOWT­­
Still
Exceed
GROUND
25­
100
0
0
1.2
0
0
1.2
0
0
1.2
0
0
101­
500
0
0
1.5
0
0
1.5
0
0
1.5
0
0
501­
1K
0
0
1.9
0
0
1.9
0
0
1.9
0
0
1K­
3.3K
0
0
2.3
0
0
2.3
0
0
2.3
0
0
3.3K­
10K
0
3.8
0
0
3.8
0
0
3.8
0
0
3.8
10K­
25K
0
7.3
0
0
7.3
0
0
7.3
0
0
7.3
25K­
50K
0
7.3
0
0
7.3
0
0
7.3
0
0
7.3
50K­
75K
13.3
0
0
13.3
0
0
13.3
0
0
13.3
0
75K­
100K
18.8
0
0
18.8
0
0
18.8
0
0
18.8
0
100K­
500K
35.6
0
0
35.6
0
0
35.6
0
0
35.6
0
500K­
1M
36.3
0
0
36.3
0
0
36.3
0
0
36.3
0
>
1M
36
0
0
36
0
0
36
0
0
36
0
SURFACE
25­
100
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
101­
500
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
501­
1K
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1K­
3.3K
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
3.3K­
10K
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
10K­
25K
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
25K­
50K
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
50K­
75K
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
75K­
100K
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
100K­
500K
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
500K­
1M
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
>
1M
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
June
1999
BASELINE
LCR
SOURCE
WATER
MONITORING
SCHEDULE
­
Number
of
Samples
per
System
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
D­
25
SCENARIO
3a
­
PWSs>
AL,
Install
SOWT
­­
Still
Exceed
GROUND
25­
100
0
0
1.2
0
0
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
101­
500
0
0
1.5
0
0
1.5
0
0
0
0
0
501­
1K
0
0
1.9
0
0
1.9
0
0
0
0
0
1K­
3.3K
0
0
2.3
0
0
2.3
0
0
0
0
0
3.3K­
10K
0
3.8
0
0
3.8
0
0
3.8
0
0
0
10K­
25K
0
7.3
0
0
7.3
0
0
7.3
0
0
0
25K­
50K
0
7.3
0
0
7.3
0
0
7.3
0
0
0
50K­
75K
13.3
0
0
13.3
13.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
75K­
100K
18.8
0
0
18.8
18.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
100K­
500K
35.6
0
0
35.6
35.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
500K­
1M
36.3
0
0
36.3
36.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
>
1M
36
0
0
36
36
0
0
0
0
0
0
SURFACE
25­
100
1.3
1.3
1.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
101­
500
1.6
1.6
1.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
501­
1K
1.9
1.9
1.9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1K­
3.3K
1.9
1.9
1.9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.3K­
10K
1.7
1.7
0
0
0
0
0
1.7
0
0
0
10K­
25K
1.9
1.9
0
0
0
0
0
1.9
0
0
0
25K­
50K
1.9
1.9
0
0
0
0
0
1.9
0
0
0
50K­
75K
4.6
4.6
0
4.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
75K­
100K
2.9
2.9
0
2.9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100K­
500K
3.3
3.3
0
3.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
500K­
1M
3.3
3.3
0
3.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>
1M
3.4
3.4
0
3.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
June
1999
D­
26
LCRMR
SOURCE
WATER
MONITORING
SCHEDULE
­
Number
of
Samples
per
System
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
SCENARIO
1
­
b3
Systems
GROUND
<
50K
Not
Applicable
50K­
75K
0
13.3
0
0
13.3
0
0
13.3
0
0
13.3
75K­
100K
0
18.8
0
0
18.8
0
0
18.8
0
0
18.8
100K­
500K
0
35.6
0
0
35.6
0
0
35.6
0
0
35.6
500K­
1M
0
36.3
0
0
36.3
0
0
36.3
0
0
36.3
>
1M
0
36
0
0
36
0
0
36
0
0
36
SURFACE
<
50K
Not
Applicable
50K­
75K
0
4.6
0
0
4.6
0
0
4.6
0
0
4.6
75K­
100K
0
2.9
0
0
2.9
0
0
2.9
0
0
2.9
100K­
500K
0
3.3
0
0
3.3
0
0
3.3
0
0
3.3
500K­
1M
0
3.3
0
0
3.3
0
0
3.3
0
0
3.3
>
1M
0
3.4
0
0
3.4
0
0
3.4
0
0
3.4
SCENARIO
2a
­
PWSs>
AL,
Not
Required
to
Install
SOWT­­
Still
Exceed
GROUND
25­
100
0
0
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
101­
500
0
0
1.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
501­
1K
0
0
1.9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1K­
3.3K
0
0
2.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.3K­
10K
0
3.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.8
10K­
25K
0
7.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7.3
25K­
50K
0
7.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7.3
50K­
75K
13.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13.3
0
75K­
100K
18.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18.8
0
100K­
500K
35.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
35.6
0
500K­
1M
36.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
36.3
0
>
1M
36
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
36
0
SURFACE
25­
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.3
0
0
101­
500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.6
0
0
501­
1K
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.9
0
0
1K­
3.3K
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.9
0
0
3.3K­
10K
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.7
0
0
10K­
25K
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.9
0
0
25K­
50K
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.9
0
0
50K­
75K
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.6
0
0
75K­
100K
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.9
0
0
100K­
500K
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.3
0
0
500K­
1M
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.3
0
0
>
1M
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.4
0
0
June
1999
LCRMR
SOURCE
WATER
MONITORING
SCHEDULE
­
Number
of
Samples
per
System
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
D­
27
SCENARIO
3a
­
PWSs>
AL,
Install
SOWT
­­
Still
Exceed
GROUND
25­
100
0
0
1.2
0
0
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
101­
500
0
0
1.5
0
0
1.5
0
0
0
0
0
501­
1K
0
0
1.9
0
0
1.9
0
0
0
0
0
1K­
3.3K
0
0
2.3
0
0
2.3
0
0
0
0
0
3.3K­
10K
0
3.8
0
0
3.8
0
0
3.8
0
0
0
10K­
25K
0
7.3
0
0
7.3
0
0
7.3
0
0
0
25K­
50K
0
7.3
0
0
7.3
0
0
7.3
0
0
0
50K­
75K
13.3
0
0
13.3
13.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
75K­
100K
18.8
0
0
18.8
18.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
100K­
500K
35.6
0
0
35.6
35.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
500K­
1M
36.3
0
0
36.3
36.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
>
1M
36
0
0
36
36
0
0
0
0
0
0
SURFACE
25­
100
1.3
1.3
1.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
101­
500
1.6
1.6
1.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
501­
1K
1.9
1.9
1.9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1K­
3.3K
1.9
1.9
1.9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.3K­
10K
1.7
1.7
0
0
0
0
0
1.7
0
0
0
10K­
25K
1.9
1.9
0
0
0
0
0
1.9
0
0
0
25K­
50K
1.9
1.9
0
0
0
0
0
1.9
0
0
0
50K­
75K
4.6
4.6
0
4.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
75K­
100K
2.9
2.9
0
2.9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100K­
500K
3.3
3.3
0
3.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
500K­
1M
3.3
3.3
0
3.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>
1M
3.4
3.4
0
3.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
June
1999
June
1999
D­
28
BASELINE
LCR
SOURCE
WATER
MONITORING
COST
ALL
WATER
SYSTEMS,
ALL
SCENARIOS,
All
$
Totals
in
thousands
Size
Category
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
8,010
$
3.7
$
3.7
$
59.0
$
3.6
$
3.6
$
58.8
$
3.6
$
3.6
$
56.5
$
3.6
$
3.6
$
203.2
101­
500
7,345
6.7
6.7
67.7
6.5
6.5
67.5
6.5
6.5
65.6
6.5
6.5
253.1
501­
1K
2,374
4.6
4.6
27.5
4.4
4.4
27.4
4.4
4.4
26.5
4.4
4.4
117.0
1K­
3.3K
2,699
9.0
9.0
36.0
8.7
8.7
35.7
8.7
8.7
34.8
8.7
8.7
176.5
3.3K­
10K
1,081
5.0
20.6
4.7
4.7
20.3
4.7
4.7
20.6
4.7
4.7
19.4
114.5
10K­
25K
484
3.0
14.3
2.9
2.9
14.1
02.9
2.9
14.3
2.9
2.9
13.6
76.6
25K­
50K
216
1.6
5.8
1.5
1.5
5.7
1.5
1.5
5.8
1.5
1.5
5.5
33.4
50K­
75K
132
3.9
13.7
1.4
3.9
13.9
1.4
3.4
13.6
1.4
3.4
13.6
73.5
75K­
100K
55
1.4
6.5
0.3
1.4
6.5
0.3
1.3
6.4
0.3
1.3
6.4
32.2
100K­
500K
149
5.0
26.4
1.0
5.0
26.6
1.0
4.8
26.4
1.0
4.8
26.4
128.3
500K­
1M
12
1.1
1.3
0.1
1.1
1.3
0.1
1.1
1.3
0.1
1.1
1.3
9.9
>
1M
6
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
1.9
Total
22,564
45.2
112.9
202.2
43.8
111.9
201.4
43.0
111.8
195.4
43.0
109.6
$
1,220.1
BASELINE
LCR
SOURCE
WATER
MONITORING
BURDEN
ALL
WATER
SYSTEMS,
ALL
SCENARIOS,
Burden
in
hours
Size
Category
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
8,010
153
153
2,415
147
147
2,409
147
147
2,312
147
147
8,323
101­
500
7,345
275
275
2,772
266
266
2,763
266
266
2,688
266
266
10,366
501­
1K
2,374
187
187
1,127
181
181
1,121
181
181
1,087
181
181
4,792
1K­
3.3K
2,699
368
368
1,473
355
355
1,461
355
355
1,425
355
355
7,226
3.3K­
10K
1,081
192
790
182
182
779
182
182
790
182
182
744
4,386
10K­
25K
484
116
547
111
111
541
111
111
547
111
111
519
2,934
25K­
50K
216
61
223
57
57
219
57
57
223
57
57
212
1,281
50K­
75K
132
150
524
52
150
533
52
132
519
52
132
519
2,814
75K­
100K
55
54
249
12
54
248
12
49
246
12
49
246
1,233
100K­
500K
149
191
1,013
40
191
1,018
40
182
1,011
40
182
1,011
4,917
500K­
1M
12
41
51
4
41
50
4
41
50
4
41
50
378
>
1M
6
6
10
3
6
10
3
6
10
3
6
10
72
Total
22,564
1,794
4,388
8,248
1,740
4,347
8,214
1,708
4,345
7,972
1,708
4,261
48,723
June
1999
June
1999
D­
29
LCRMR
SOURCE
WATER
MONITORING
COST
ALL
WATER
SYSTEMS,
ALL
SCENARIOS,
All
$
Totals
in
thousands
Size
Category
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
8,010
$
0.1
$
0.1
$
55.4
$
0.0
$
0.0
$
2.4
$
0.0
$
0.0
$
3.6
$
0.0
$
0.0
$
61.6
101­
500
7,345
0.2
0.2
61.2
0.0
0.0
1.8
0.0
0.0
6.5
0.0
0.0
70.0
501­
1K
2,374
0.2
0.2
23.1
0.0
0.0
0.8
0.0
0.0
4.4
0.0
0.0
28.7
1K­
3.3K
2,699
0.3
0.3
27.3
0.0
0.0
0.9
0.0
0.0
8.7
0.0
0.0
37.5
3.3K­
10K
1,081
0.3
15.9
0.0
0.0
0.9
0.0
0.0
1.2
4.7
0.0
14.7
37.7
10K­
25K
484
0.1
11.4
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.7
2.9
0.0
10.7
26.4
25K­
50K
216
0.1
4.3
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.3
1.5
0.0
4.0
10.4
50K­
75K
132
2.5
12.3
0.0
0.5
12.5
0.0
0.0
12.2
1.4
2.1
12.2
55.7
75K­
100K
55
1.1
6.2
0.0
0.1
6.2
0.0
0.0
6.1
0.3
1.0
6.1
27.1
100K­
500K
149
3.9
25.4
0.0
0.2
25.5
0.0
0.0
25.4
1.0
3.7
25.4
110.6
500K­
1M
12
1.0
1.2
0.0
0.0
1.2
0.0
0.0
1.2
0.1
0.9
1.2
6.9
>
1M
6
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
1.0
Total
22,564
10.0
77.7
167.0
0.8
47.3
5.9
0.0
47.2
35.2
7.8
74.4
473.5
LCRMR
SOURCE
WATER
MONITORING
BURDEN
ALL
WATER
SYSTEMS,
ALL
SCENARIOS,
Burden
in
hours
Size
Category
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
8,010
6
6
2,268
0
0
97
0
0
147
0
0
2,524
101­
500
7,345
9
9
2,507
0
0
75
0
0
266
0
0
2,865
501­
1K
2,374
6
6
947
0
0
34
0
0
181
0
0
1,174
1K­
3.3K
2,699
12
12
1,118
0
0
36
0
0
355
0
0
1,534
3.3K­
10K
1,081
10
608
0
0
35
0
0
45
182
0
562
1,443
10K­
25K
484
6
436
0
0
22
0
0
28
111
0
409
1,011
25K­
50K
216
4
166
0
0
7
0
0
11
57
0
155
400
50K­
75K
132
98
472
0
18
481
0
0
467
52
80
467
2,135
75K­
100K
55
42
237
0
5
236
0
0
234
12
38
234
1,039
100K­
500K
149
151
973
0
9
978
0
0
971
40
142
971
4,236
500K­
1M
12
37
47
0
0
46
0
0
46
4
36
46
263
>
1M
6
4
7
0
0
7
0
0
7
3
4
7
37
Total
22,564
385
2,979
6,839
32
1,813
243
0
1,810
1,408
300
2,852
18,661
June
1999
June
1999
D­
30
SOURCE
WATER
MONITORING
DIFFERENCE
IN
COST:
LCRMR
minus
Baseline
Model
ALL
WATER
SYSTEMS,
ALL
SCENARIOS,
All
$
Totals
in
thousands
Size
Category
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
8,010
­$
3.6
­$
3.6
­$
3.6
­$
3.6
­$
3.6
­$
56.5
­$
3.6
­$
3.6
­$
52.9
­$
3.6
­$
3.6
­$
141.6
101­
500
7,345
­
6.5
­
6.5
­
6.5
­
6.5
­
6.5
­
65.6
­
6.5
­
6.5
­
59.2
­
6.5
­
6.5
­
183.2
501­
1K
2,374
­
4.4
­
4.4
­
4.4
­
4.4
­
4.4
­
26.5
­
4.4
­
4.4
­
22.1
­
4.4
­
4.4
­
88.3
1K­
3.3K
2,699
­
8.7
­
8.7
­
8.7
­
8.7
­
8.7
­
34.8
­
8.7
­
8.7
­
26.1
­
8.7
­
8.7
­
139.0
3.3K­
10K
1,081
­
4.7
­
4.7
­
4.7
­
4.7
­
19.4
­
4.7
­
4.7
­
19.4
0.0
­
4.7
­
4.7
­
76.8
10K­
25K
484
­
2.9
­
2.9
­
2.9
­
2.9
­
13.6
­
2.9
­
2.9
­
13.6
0.0
­
2.9
­
2.9
­
50.2
25K­
50K
216
­
1.5
­
1.5
­
1.5
­
1.5
­
5.5
­
1.5
­
1.5
­
5.5
0.0
­
1.5
­
1.5
­
23.0
50K­
75K
132
­
1.4
­
1.4
­
1.4
­
3.4
­
1.4
­
1.4
­
3.4
­
1.4
0.0
­
1.4
­
1.4
­
17.7
75K­
100K
55
­
0.3
­
0.3
­
0.3
­
1.3
­
0.3
­
0.3
­
1.3
­
0.3
0.0
­
0.3
­
0.3
­
5.1
100K­
500K
149
­
1.0
­
1.0
­
1.0
­
4.8
­
1.0
­
1.0
­
4.8
­
1.0
0.0
­
1.0
­
1.0
­
17.8
500K­
1M
12
­
0.1
­
0.1
­
0.1
­
1.1
­
0.1
­
0.1
­
1.1
­
0.1
0.0
­
0.1
­
0.1
­
3.0
>
1M
6
­
0.1
­
0.1
­
0.1
­
0.2
­
0.1
­
0.1
­
0.2
­
0.1
0.0
­
0.1
­
0.1
­
0.9
Total
22,564
­
35.2
­
35.2
­
35.2
­
43.0
­
64.6
­
195.4
­
43.0
­
64.6
­
160.3
­
35.2
­
35.2
­
746.6
SOURCE
WATER
MONITORING
DIFFERENCE
IN
BURDEN:
LCRMR
minus
Baseline
Model
ALL
WATER
SYSTEMS,
ALL
SCENARIOS,
Burden
in
hours
Size
Category
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
8,010
­
147
­
147
­
147
­
147
­
147
­
2,312
­
147
­
147
­
2,165
­
147
­
147
­
5,799
101­
500
7,345
­
266
­
266
­
266
­
266
­
266
­
2,688
­
266
­
266
­
2,423
­
266
­
266
­
7,501
501­
1K
2,374
­
181
­
181
­
181
­
181
­
181
­
1,087
­
181
­
181
­
906
­
181
­
181
­
3,618
1K­
3.3K
2,699
­
355
­
355
­
355
­
355
­
355
­
1,425
­
355
­
355
­
1,070
­
355
­
355
­
5,692
3.3K­
10K
1,081
­
182
­
182
­
182
­
182
­
744
­
182
­
182
­
744
0
­
182
­
182
­
2,944
10K­
25K
484
­
111
­
111
­
111
­
111
­
519
­
111
­
111
­
519
0
­
111
­
111
­
1,923
25K­
50K
216
­
57
­
57
­
57
­
57
­
212
­
57
­
57
­
212
0
­
57
­
57
­
881
50K­
75K
132
­
52
­
52
­
52
­
132
­
52
­
52
­
132
­
52
0
­
52
­
52
­
679
75K­
100K
55
­
12
­
12
­
12
­
49
­
12
­
12
­
49
­
12
0
­
12
­
12
­
194
100K­
500K
149
­
40
­
40
­
40
­
182
­
40
­
40
­
182
­
40
0
­
40
­
40
­
681
500K­
1M
12
­
4
­
4
­
4
­
41
­
4
­
4
­
41
­
4
0
­
4
­
4
­
116
>
1M
6
­
3
­
3
­
3
­
6
­
3
­
3
­
6
­
3
0
­
3
­
3
­
34
Total
22,564
­
1,408
­
1,408
­
1,408
­
1,708
­
2,534
­
7,972
­
1,708
­
2,534
­
6,563
­
1,408
­
1,408
­
30,062
June
1999
D­
31
LEAD
SERVICE
LINE
MONITORING
MODELS
The
baseline
and
revised
Lead
Service
Line
(
LSL)
Monitoring
Schedules,
present
the
total
number
of
samples
per
year
during
1999
­
2009
for
each
system
for
each
of
the
possible
lead
service
line
monitoring
schedules.
LSL
monitoring
only
applies
to
community
water
systems
(
CWSs),
thus
the
schedules
and
costs
do
not
include
non­
transient
non­
community
water
systems
(
NTNCWSs).
Under
both
the
baseline
and
LCRMR
models,
systems
are
assumed
to
conduct
two
types
of
LSL
monitoring:
1)
Monitoring
to
determine
if
a
line
needs
to
be
replaced
and
2)
Monitoring
required
after
a
line
has
been
partially
replaced.
Within
these
two
categories
of
monitoring,
medium
and
small
systems
are
divided
into
those
required
to
conduct
a
corrosion
control
study
and
those
for
which
no
study
is
required;
large
systems
are
placed
in
the
required
to
conduct
a
study
category.
Systems
that
conduct
a
study
are
assumed
to
begin
LSL
replacement
1
year
(
for
small
systems)
to
18
months
later
(
for
medium
systems)
than
those
systems
that
are
not
required
to
perform
a
study.

Both
the
baseline
and
revised
estimates
assume
that
laboratory
costs
are
$
3.65
per
lead
sample.
The
commercial
fee
of
$
15
was
adjusted
to
eliminate
the
labor
component
to
avoid
double
counting,
as
all
analyses
are
assumed
to
be
performed
in­
house
(
i.
e.,
$
15
­
$
11.35).
In
addition,
both
models
assume
that
a
total
of
2.5
hours
of
system
labor
for
collection
and
analysis
related
to
each
LSL
sample.

The
models
also
include
burdens
and
costs
associated
with
partial
lead
service
line
notification
requirements.
The
baseline
model
assumes
that
15
minutes
is
needed
per
household
to
offer
to
collect
the
sample/
inform
people
of
the
sample
results.
For
the
LCRMR
model,
the
same
burden
assumptions
are
applied
to
small
and
medium
systems
to
fulfill
the
pre­
and
post­
notification
requirements,
but
large
systems
are
assumed
to
require
0.5
hours
per
household.
Both
models
also
include
a
mailing
cost
of
$
0.33
per
notification.

Burden
and
cost
summaries
for
the
baseline
model,
the
LCRMR
model,
and
the
difference
between
the
two
are
presented
after
the
monitoring
schedules.
The
differences
in
burden
and
costs
between
the
two
models
are
due
primarily
to
the
collection
of
post­
replacement
samples
at
each
line
under
the
LCRMR
instead
of
at
each
home,
as
is
assumed
under
the
baseline
model.
This
burden
and
cost
savings
is
offset
slightly
by
the
more
extensive
partial
lead
service
line
notification
requirements
under
the
LCRMR.
June
1999
D­
32
BASELINE
LCR
LEAD
SERVICE
LINE
MONITORING
SCHEDULE
­
Number
of
Samples
per
Community
Water
System
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Lead
Service
Line
Monitoring
to
Determine
Whether
the
Line
Should
Be
Replaced,
Study
Required
25­
100
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
101­
500
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
501­
1K
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
1K­
3.3K
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
3.3K­
10K
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
10K­
25K
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
25K­
50K
188
188
188
188
188
188
188
188
188
188
188
50K­
75K
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
75K­
100K
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
100K­
500K
829
829
829
829
829
829
829
829
829
829
829
500K­
1M
1,725
1,725
1,725
1,725
1,725
1,725
1,725
1,725
1,725
1,725
1,725
>
1M
13,333
13,333
13,333
13,333
13,333
13,333
13,333
13,333
13,333
13,333
13,333
Lead
Service
Line
Monitoring
to
Determine
Whether
the
Line
Should
Be
Replaced,
No
Study
Required
25­
100
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
101­
500
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
501­
1K
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
1K­
3.3K
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
3.3K­
10K
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
10K­
25K
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
25K­
50K
188
188
188
188
188
188
188
188
188
188
188
>
50K
Not
Applicable
Partial
LSL
Replacement,
Study
Required
25­
100
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
101­
500
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
501­
1K
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
1K­
3.3K
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
3.3K­
10K
56
56
56
56
56
56
56
56
56
56
56
10K­
25K
101
101
101
101
101
101
101
101
101
101
101
25K­
50K
260
260
260
260
260
260
260
260
260
260
260
50K­
75K
279
279
279
279
279
279
279
279
279
279
279
75K­
100K
299
299
299
299
299
299
299
299
299
299
299
100K­
500K
1,144
1,144
1,144
1,144
1,144
1,144
1,144
1,144
1,144
1,144
1,144
500K­
1M
2,380
2,380
2,380
2,380
2,380
2,380
2,380
2,380
2,380
2,380
2,380
>
1M
18,400
18,400
18,400
18,400
18,400
18,400
18,400
18,400
18,400
18,400
18,400
Partial
LSL
Replacement,
No
Study
Required
25­
100
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
101­
500
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
501­
1K
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
1K­
3.3K
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
3.3K­
10K
56
56
56
56
56
56
56
56
56
56
56
10K­
25K
101
101
101
101
101
101
101
101
101
101
101
25K­
50K
260
260
260
260
260
260
260
260
260
260
260
>
50K
Not
Applicable
June
1999
D­
33
LCRMR
LEAD
SERVICE
LINE
MONITORING
SCHEDULE
­
Number
of
Samples
per
Community
Water
System
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Lead
Service
Line
Monitoring
to
Determine
Whether
the
Line
Should
Be
Replaced,
Study
Required
25­
100
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
101­
500
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
501­
1K
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
1K­
3.3K
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
3.3K­
10K
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
10K­
25K
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
25K­
50K
188
188
188
188
188
188
188
188
188
188
188
50K­
75K
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
75K­
100K
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
100K­
500K
829
829
829
829
829
829
829
829
829
829
829
500K­
1M
1,725
1,725
1,725
1,725
1,725
1,725
1,725
1,725
1,725
1,725
1,725
>
1M
13,333
13,333
13,333
13,333
13,333
13,333
13,333
13,333
13,333
13,333
13,333
Lead
Service
Line
Monitoring
to
Determine
Whether
the
Line
Should
Be
Replaced,
No
Study
Required
25­
100
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
101­
500
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
501­
1K
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
1K­
3.3K
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
3.3K­
10K
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
10K­
25K
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
25K­
50K
188
188
188
188
188
188
188
188
188
188
188
>
50K
Not
Applicable
Partial
LSL
Replacement,
Study
Required
25­
100
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
101­
500
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
501­
1K
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
1K­
3.3K
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
3.3K­
10K
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
10K­
25K
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
25K­
50K
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
50K­
75K
121
121
121
121
121
121
121
121
121
121
121
75K­
100K
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
100K­
500K
497
497
497
497
497
497
497
497
497
497
497
500K­
1M
1,035
1,035
1,035
1,035
1,035
1,035
1,035
1,035
1,035
1,035
1,035
>
1M
8,000
8,000
8,000
8,000
8,000
8,000
8,000
8,000
8,000
8,000
8,000
Partial
LSL
Replacement,
No
Study
Required
25­
100
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
101­
500
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
501­
1K
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
1K­
3.3K
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
3.3K­
10K
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
10K­
25K
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
25K­
50K
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
113
>
50K
Not
Applicable
June
1999
D­
34
BASELINE
LCR
LEAD
SERVICE
LINE
MONITORING
COST
ALL
CWSs,
All
$
Totals
in
thousands
Size
Category
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
123
$
26
$
35
$
35
$
35
$
35
$
35
$
35
$
35
$
35
$
35
$
35
$
375
101­
500
179
93
124
124
124
124
124
124
124
124
124
124
1,333
501­
1K
119
164
219
219
219
219
219
219
219
219
219
219
2,359
1K­
3.3K
171
256
342
342
342
342
342
342
342
342
342
342
3,676
3.3K­
10K
89
463
463
463
463
463
463
463
463
463
463
463
5,094
10K­
25K
42
392
392
392
392
392
392
392
392
392
392
392
4,309
25K­
50K
19
455
455
455
455
455
455
455
455
455
455
455
5,009
50K­
75K
6
154
154
154
154
154
154
154
154
154
154
154
1,692
75K­
100K
3
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
909
100K­
500K
9
947
947
947
947
947
947
947
947
947
947
947
10,419
500K­
1M
1
219
219
219
219
219
219
219
219
219
219
219
2,409
>
1M
1
1,693
1,693
1,693
1,693
1,693
1,693
1,693
1,693
1,693
1,693
1,693
18,622
Total
762
4,945
5,126
5,126
5,126
5,126
5,126
5,126
5,126
5,126
5,126
5,126
56,206
BASELINE
LCR
LEAD
SERVICE
LINE
MONITORING
BURDEN
ALL
CWSs,
Burden
in
hours
Size
Category
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
123
1,407
1,881
1,881
1,881
1,881
1,881
1,881
1,881
1,881
1,881
1,881
20,222
101­
500
179
5,005
6,686
6,686
6,686
6,686
6,686
6,686
6,686
6,686
6,686
6,686
71,862
501­
1K
119
8,852
11,836
11,836
11,836
11,836
11,836
11,836
11,836
11,836
11,836
11,836
127,211
1K­
3.3K
171
13,805
18,443
18,443
18,443
18,443
18,443
18,443
18,443
18,443
18,443
18,443
198,236
3.3K­
10K
89
22,896
22,896
22,896
22,896
22,896
22,896
22,896
22,896
22,896
22,896
22,896
251,853
10K­
25K
42
19,371
19,371
19,371
19,371
19,371
19,371
19,371
19,371
19,371
19,371
19,371
213,081
25K­
50K
19
22,518
22,518
22,518
22,518
22,518
22,518
22,518
22,518
22,518
22,518
22,518
247,694
50K­
75K
6
7,625
7,625
7,625
7,625
7,625
7,625
7,625
7,625
7,625
7,625
7,625
83,870
75K­
100K
3
4,097
4,097
4,097
4,097
4,097
4,097
4,097
4,097
4,097
4,097
4,097
45,065
100K­
500K
9
46,959
46,959
46,959
46,959
46,959
46,959
46,959
46,959
46,959
46,959
46,959
516,554
500K­
1M
1
10,856
10,856
10,856
10,856
10,856
10,856
10,856
10,856
10,856
10,856
10,856
119,420
>
1M
1
83,933
83,933
83,933
83,933
83,933
83,933
83,933
83,933
83,933
83,933
83,933
923,267
Total
762
247,324
257,101
257,101
257,101
257,101
257,101
257,101
257,101
257,101
257,101
257,101
2,818,334
June
1999
D­
35
LCRMR
LEAD
SERVICE
LINE
MONITORING
COST
ALL
CWSs,
All
$
Totals
in
thousands
Size
Category
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
123
$
16
$
22
$
22
$
22
$
22
$
22
$
22
$
22
$
22
$
22
$
22
$
237
101­
500
179
64
86
86
86
86
86
86
86
86
86
86
921
501­
1K
119
113
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
152
1,630
1K­
3.3K
171
177
236
236
236
236
236
236
236
236
236
236
2,539
3.3K­
10K
89
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
3,518
10K­
25K
42
271
271
271
271
271
271
271
271
271
271
271
2,977
25K­
50K
19
315
315
315
315
315
315
315
315
315
315
315
3,460
50K­
75K
6
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
114
1,258
75K­
100K
3
61
61
61
61
61
61
61
61
61
61
61
676
100K­
500K
9
704
704
704
704
704
704
704
704
704
704
704
7,748
500K­
1M
1
163
163
163
163
163
163
163
163
163
163
163
1,791
>
1M
1
1,259
1,259
1,259
1,259
1,259
1,259
1,259
1,259
1,259
1,259
1,259
13,848
Total
762
3,578
3,703
3,703
3,703
3,703
3,703
3,703
3,703
3,703
3,703
3,703
40,603
LCRMR
LEAD
SERVICE
LINE
MONITORING
BURDEN
ALL
CWSs,
Burden
in
hours
Size
Category
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
123
889
1,189
1,189
1,189
1,189
1,189
1,189
1,189
1,189
1,189
1,189
12,775
101­
500
179
3,455
4,615
4,615
4,615
4,615
4,615
4,615
4,615
4,615
4,615
4,615
49,601
501­
1K
119
6,110
8,169
8,169
8,169
8,169
8,169
8,169
8,169
8,169
8,169
8,169
87,805
1K­
3.3K
171
9,529
12,730
12,730
12,730
12,730
12,730
12,730
12,730
12,730
12,730
12,730
136,829
3.3K­
10K
89
15,803
15,803
15,803
15,803
15,803
15,803
15,803
15,803
15,803
15,803
15,803
173,837
10K­
25K
42
13,370
13,370
13,370
13,370
13,370
13,370
13,370
13,370
13,370
13,370
13,370
147,075
25K­
50K
19
15,542
15,542
15,542
15,542
15,542
15,542
15,542
15,542
15,542
15,542
15,542
170,966
50K­
75K
6
5,681
5,681
5,681
5,681
5,681
5,681
5,681
5,681
5,681
5,681
5,681
62,486
75K­
100K
3
3,052
3,052
3,052
3,052
3,052
3,052
3,052
3,052
3,052
3,052
3,052
33,575
100K­
500K
9
34,986
34,986
34,986
34,986
34,986
34,986
34,986
34,986
34,986
34,986
34,986
384,851
500K­
1M
1
8,088
8,088
8,088
8,088
8,088
8,088
8,088
8,088
8,088
8,088
8,088
88,972
>
1M
1
62,533
62,533
62,533
62,533
62,533
62,533
62,533
62,533
62,533
62,533
62,533
687,867
Total
762
179,039
185,760
185,760
185,760
185,760
185,760
185,760
185,760
185,760
185,760
185,760
2,036,638
June
1999
D­
36
LEAD
SERVICE
LINE
MONITORING
DIFFERENCE
IN
COST:
LCRMR
minus
Baseline
Model
ALL
CWSs,
All
$
Totals
in
thousands
Size
Category
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
123
­$
10
­$
13
­$
13
­$
13
­$
13
­$
13
­$
13
­$
13
­$
13
­$
13
­$
13
­$
138
101­
500
179
­
29
­
38
­
38
­
38
­
38
­
38
­
38
­
38
­
38
­
38
­
38
­
412
501­
1K
119
­
51
­
68
­
68
­
68
­
68
­
68
­
68
­
68
­
68
­
68
­
68
­
730
1K­
3.3K
171
­
79
­
106
­
106
­
106
­
106
­
106
­
106
­
106
­
106
­
106
­
106
­
1,137
3.3K­
10K
89
­
143
­
143
­
143
­
143
­
143
­
143
­
143
­
143
­
143
­
143
­
143
­
1,575
10K­
25K
42
­
121
­
121
­
121
­
121
­
121
­
121
­
121
­
121
­
121
­
121
­
121
­
1,333
25K­
50K
19
­
141
­
141
­
141
­
141
­
141
­
141
­
141
­
141
­
141
­
141
­
141
­
1,549
50K­
75K
6
­
39
­
39
­
39
­
39
­
39
­
39
­
39
­
39
­
39
­
39
­
39
­
434
75K­
100K
3
­
21
­
21
­
21
­
21
­
21
­
21
­
21
­
21
­
21
­
21
­
21
­
233
100K­
500K
9
­
243
­
243
­
243
­
243
­
243
­
243
­
243
­
243
­
243
­
243
­
243
­
2,671
500K­
1M
1
­
56
­
56
­
56
­
56
­
56
­
56
­
56
­
56
­
56
­
56
­
56
­
617
>
1M
1
­
434
­
434
­
434
­
434
­
434
­
434
­
434
­
434
­
434
­
434
­
434
­
4,774
Total
762
­
1,367
­
1,424
­
1,424
­
1,424
­
1,424
­
1,424
­
1,424
­
1,424
­
1,424
­
1,424
­
1,424
­
15,603
LEAD
SERVICE
LINE
MONITORING
DIFFERENCE
IN
BURDEN:
LCRMR
minus
Baseline
Model
ALL
CWSs,
Burden
in
hours
Size
Category
Systems
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
TOTAL
25­
100
123
­
518
­
693
­
693
­
693
­
693
­
693
­
693
­
693
­
693
­
693
­
693
­
7,447
101­
500
179
­
1,550
­
2,071
­
2,071
­
2,071
­
2,071
­
2,071
­
2,071
­
2,071
­
2,071
­
2,071
­
2,071
­
22,261
501­
1K
119
­
2,742
­
3,666
­
3,666
­
3,666
­
3,666
­
3,666
­
3,666
­
3,666
­
3,666
­
3,666
­
3,666
­
39,406
1K­
3.3K
171
­
4,276
­
5,713
­
5,713
­
5,713
­
5,713
­
5,713
­
5,713
­
5,713
­
5,713
­
5,713
­
5,713
­
61,408
3.3K­
10K
89
­
7,092
­
7,092
­
7,092
­
7,092
­
7,092
­
7,092
­
7,092
­
7,092
­
7,092
­
7,092
­
7,092
­
78,017
10K­
25K
42
­
6,001
­
6,001
­
6,001
­
6,001
­
6,001
­
6,001
­
6,001
­
6,001
­
6,001
­
6,001
­
6,001
­
66,006
25K­
50K
19
­
6,975
­
6,975
­
6,975
­
6,975
­
6,975
­
6,975
­
6,975
­
6,975
­
6,975
­
6,975
­
6,975
­
76,728
50K­
75K
6
­
1,944
­
1,944
­
1,944
­
1,944
­
1,944
­
1,944
­
1,944
­
1,944
­
1,944
­
1,944
­
1,944
­
21,384
75K­
100K
3
­
1,045
­
1,045
­
1,045
­
1,045
­
1,045
­
1,045
­
1,045
­
1,045
­
1,045
­
1,045
­
1,045
­
11,490
100K­
500K
9
­
11,973
­
11,973
­
11,973
­
11,973
­
11,973
­
11,973
­
11,973
­
11,973
­
11,973
­
11,973
­
11,973
­
131,703
500K­
1M
1
­
2,768
­
2,768
­
2,768
­
2,768
­
2,768
­
2,768
­
2,768
­
2,768
­
2,768
­
2,768
­
2,768
­
30,448
>
1M
1
­
21,400
­
21,400
­
21,400
­
21,400
­
21,400
­
21,400
­
21,400
­
21,400
­
21,400
­
21,400
­
21,400
­
235,400
Total
762
­
68,285
­
71,341
­
71,341
­
71,341
­
71,341
­
71,341
­
71,341
­
71,341
­
71,341
­
71,341
­
71,341
­
781,696
June
1999
D­
37
PUBLIC
EDUCATION
MODELS
The
Baseline
and
LCRMR
public
education
models
estimate
the
burden
and
costs
for
delivering
public
education.
Those
burdens
and
costs
for
reporting
compliance
to
the
State
are
included
under
the
System
Reporting
Model.
By
1999,
only
those
systems
that
continue
to
exceed
after
treatment
are
assumed
to
be
delivering
public
education.

The
delivery
requirements
for
CWSs
are
different
than
those
for
NTNCWSs
and
burden
and
cost
estimates
have
been
calculated
separately
for
these
systems.
The
revisions
to
the
public
education
requirements
for
NTNCWSs
are
not
assumed
to
have
a
quantifiable
impact
and
therefore,
the
burden
and
costs
for
these
systems
are
the
same
under
the
baseline
and
LCRMR
models.
CWSs
serving
3,300
and
fewer
people
have
a
lower
cost
and
burden
in
the
LCRMR
model
because
they
are
assumed
to
no
longer
deliver
(
PSAs)
or
newspaper
notifications.

Five
burden
and
cost
tables
follow
this
narrative.
The
first
four
tables
show
in
detail
how
the
annual
public
education
burdens
and
costs
were
derived
for
CWSs
and
NTNCWSs
(
all
burdens
and
costs
are
the
same
each
year).
First,
the
burden
and
cost
to
CWSs
to
mail
inserts
and
pamphlets
are
presented
in
one
table
that
applies
to
both
to
the
baseline
and
LCRMR
models.
Next
are
two
separate
baseline
and
LCRMR
tables
that
contain
the
CWS
burden
and
cost
for
providing
PSAs
and
newspaper
notification.
The
fourth
table
includes
the
burden
and
costs
for
NTNCWSs
and
applies
to
both
the
baseline
and
LCRMR
models.
The
final
table
contains
the
total
burden
and
cost
for
the
two
models
and
the
difference.
June
1999
D­
38
CWSs
­
BASELINE
AND
LCRMR
PUBLIC
EDUCATION
MODELS:
Burdens
and
Costs
to
Mail
Inserts
and
Pamphlets
System
Size
Total
Number
of
CWSs
CWSs
Required
to
Conduct
Public
Education1
Average
Number
of
Public
Education
Written
Materials
2,3
Non­
labor
Materials
and
Mailing
Costs
Labor
Costs
Total
Labor
plus
Non­
Labor
Cost
(
all
sys)

($
1,000'
s)

Cost
per
Piece4
($)
Cost
for
Materials
(
all
sys)

($
1,000'
s)
Cost
for
Mailing
5
(
all
sys)

($
1,000'
s)
Total
Non­

Labor
(
all
sys)

($
1,000'
s)
Labor
hours
per
System
to
Mail
Materials
6
(
hrs/
sys)
Total
Labor
Cost
(
all
sys)

($
1,000'
s)

separately
with
water
bill
25­
100
16,493
1,031
29
$
0.24
$
7.18
$
4.93
$
12.11
15
3.75
$
138.12
$
150.23
101­
500
17,096
1,069
111
$
0.24
$
28.48
$
19.58
$
48.06
15
3.75
$
143.21
$
191.27
501­
1K
5,887
368
313
$
0.24
$
27.64
$
19.01
$
46.65
25
6.25
$
82.17
$
128.82
1K­
3.3K
8,247
515
795
$
0.24
$
98.26
$
67.56
$
165.82
25
6.25
$
114.99
$
280.81
3.3K­
10K
4,243
212
2,446
$
0.22
$
111.49
$
85.56
$
197.05
60
15
$
132.69
$
329.74
10K­
25K
1,915
96
6,692
$
0.15
$
96.36
$
106.00
$
202.37
60
15
$
60.08
$
262.45
25K­
50K
860
43
14,858
$
0.15
$
95.83
$
105.42
$
201.25
60
15
$
26.91
$
228.16
50K­
75K
289
14
25,577
$
0.15
$
53.71
$
59.08
$
112.79
60
15
$
8.76
$
121.56
75K­
100K
116
6
35,801
$
0.15
$
32.22
$
35.44
$
67.66
60
15
$
3.76
$
71.42
100K­

500K
286
14
83,245
$
0.12
$
139.85
$
192.30
$
332.15
60
15
$
8.76
$
340.91
500K­
1M
28
1
290,265
$
0.12
$
34.83
$
47.89
$
82.73
60
15
$
0.63
$
83.35
>
1M
15
1
873,167
$
0.12
$
104.78
$
144.07
$
248.85
60
15
$
0.63
$
249.48
Total
55,475
3,370
$
830.64
$
886.84
$
1,717.48
$
720.71
$
2,438.19
1.
25%
initial
lead
exceedance
rate
for
small
systems
and
20%
initial
lead
exceedance
rate
for
medium
and
large
systems.
Of
these,
25%
are
assumed
to
continue
to
exceed.

2.
The
number
of
households
receiving
inserts
are
assumed
to
equal
the
average
population
served
for
a
given
size
category
divided
by
2.4
(
1990
Census
figure
for
the
average
number
of
people
per
household).

3.
For
systems
serving
>
3,300
people,
the
number
of
pamphlets
and
brochures
was
derived
by
assuming
58.1
doctors
and
31
schools
for
every
100,000
people.
This
estimate
is
considered
to
be
conservative
enough
to
cover
other
facilities
and
organizations
that
are
likely
to
provide
services
to
pregnant
women
and
children.
For
systems
serving
3,300
or
fewer
people,
the
number
of
pamphlets
and
brochures
was
estimated
at
5.

4.
CWSs
will
buy
material
already
printed
(
1991
RIA
assumption).
The
cost
per
piece
is
taken
from
the
AWWA
1998
bookstore
catalog.

5.
The
cost
to
mail
public
education
materials
is
33
cents,
the
first
class
rate
for
1999.
It
is
assumed
that
50%
of
systems
will
mail
public
education
materials
separately,
and
50%
will
mail
materials
with
their
water
bills.

6.
50%
of
systems
are
assumed
to
mail
materials
with
the
water
bill,
and
the
burden
per
system
is
assumed
to
be
3.75
hours
for
systems
serving
500
or
fewer,
6.35
hours
for
systems
serving
501­
3,300,
and
15
hours
for
systems
serving
over
3,300.
The
burden
per
system
associated
with
mailings
separately
for
50%
of
systems
is
June
1999
D­
39
assumed
to
be
15
hours
for
systems
serving
500
or
fewer,
25
hours
for
systems
serving
501­
3,300,
and
60
hours
for
systems
serving
over
3,300.

CWSs
­
BASELINE
PUBLIC
EDUCATION
MODEL:
Burdens
and
Costs
to
Deliver
PSAs
and
Newspaper
Notification
System
Size
Total
Number
of
CWSs
Number
of
Entities
w/
Notif
1
Cost
for
Postage
(
per
sys)
($)
Labor
hrs
per
notif
(
hr)
2
Labor
for
2
notifications
per
year
(
per
system)
Cost
for
Postage
(
all
systems)

($)
Labor
for
2
notifications
per
year
(
all
systems)
Total
Cost
(
all
sys)

($
1,000'
s)

Burden
(
hr)
Labor
Cost
($)
Burden
(
hr)
Labor
Cost
($
1,000'
s)

25­
100
1,031
3
$
1.98
1
2
$
28.58
$
2,041.38
2,062
$
29.47
$
31.51
101­
500
1,069
3
$
1.98
1
2
$
28.58
$
2,116.62
2,138
$
30.55
$
32.67
501­
1K
368
3
$
1.98
1
2
$
28.58
$
728.64
736
$
10.52
$
11.25
1K­
3.3K
515
3
$
1.98
1
2
$
28.58
$
1,019.70
1,030
$
14.72
$
15.74
3.3K­
10K
212
8
$
5.28
1
2
$
33.38
$
1,119.36
424
$
7.08
$
8.20
10K­
25K
96
8
$
5.28
1
2
$
33.38
$
506.88
192
$
3.20
$
3.71
25K­
50K
43
8
$
5.28
1
2
$
33.38
$
227.04
86
$
1.44
$
1.66
50K­
75K
14
8
$
5.28
1
2
$
33.38
$
73.92
28
$
0.47
$
0.54
75K­
100K
6
8
$
5.28
1
2
$
33.38
$
31.68
12
$
0.20
$
0.23
100K­
500K
14
8
$
5.28
1
2
$
33.38
$
73.92
28
$
0.47
$
0.54
500K­
1M
1
8
$
5.28
1
2
$
33.38
$
5.28
2
$
0.03
$
0.04
>
1M
1
8
$
5.28
1
2
$
33.38
$
5.28
2
$
0.03
$
0.04
Total
3,370
$
7,949.70
6,740
$
98.17
$
106.12
1.
The
baseline
model
assumes
that
systems
serving
<
3,300
people
will
send
public
education
materials
to
a
total
of
3
newspapers,
radio,
or
TV
stations
and
that
systems
serving
>
3,300
people
will
send
these
materials
to
a
total
of
8
of
these
facilities.

2.
Systems
will
require
1
hour
to
prepare
and
mail
notification
to
newspapers,
radio
and
TV
stations.
Newspapers
are
assumed
to
run
the
public
education
materials
as
a
public
service
announcement,
free
of
charge.
Systems
are
assumed
to
incur
a
postage
cost
of
$
0.33
per
mailing.
June
1999
D­
40
CWSs
­
LCRMR
PUBLIC
EDUCATION
MODEL:
Burdens
and
Costs
to
Deliver
PSAs
and
Newspaper
Notification
System
Size
Total
Number
of
CWSs
Number
of
Entities
w/
Notif
1
Cost
for
Postage
(
per
sys)
($)
Labor
hrs
per
notif
(
hr)
2
Labor
for
2
notifications
per
year
(
per
system)
Cost
for
Postage
(
all
systems)

($)
Labor
for
2
notifications
per
year
(
all
systems)
Total
Cost
(
all
sys)

($
1,000'
s)

Burden
(
hr)
Labor
Cost
($)
Burden
(
hr)
Labor
Cost
($
1,000'
s)

25­
100
1,031
0
$
0.00
0
0
$
0.00
$
0.00
0
$
0.00
$
0.00
101­
500
1,069
0
$
0.00
0
0
$
0.00
$
0.00
0
$
0.00
$
0.00
501­
1K
368
0
$
0.00
0
0
$
0.00
$
0.00
0
$
0.00
$
0.00
1K­
3.3K
515
0
$
0.00
0
0
$
0.00
$
0.00
0
$
0.00
$
0.00
3.3K­
10K
212
8
$
5.28
1
2
$
33.38
$
1,119.36
424
$
7.08
$
8.20
10K­
25K
96
8
$
5.28
1
2
$
33.38
$
506.88
192
$
3.20
$
3.71
25K­
50K
43
8
$
5.28
1
2
$
33.38
$
227.04
86
$
1.44
$
1.66
50K­
75K
14
8
$
5.28
1
2
$
33.38
$
73.92
28
$
0.47
$
0.54
75K­
100K
6
8
$
5.28
1
2
$
33.38
$
31.68
12
$
0.20
$
0.23
100K­
500K
14
8
$
5.28
1
2
$
33.38
$
73.92
28
$
0.47
$
0.54
500K­
1M
1
8
$
5.28
1
2
$
33.38
$
5.28
2
$
0.03
$
0.04
>
1M
1
8
$
5.28
1
2
$
33.38
$
5.28
2
$
0.03
$
0.04
Total
3,370
$
2,043.36
774
$
12.92
$
14.97
1.
The
LCRMR
model
assumes
that
systems
serving
>
3,300
people
will
send
materials
to
8
facilities,
but
that
States
will
not
require
systems
serving
<
3,300
people
to
deliver
public
service
announcements
or
send
notices
to
newspapers.

2.
Systems
will
require
1
hour
to
prepare
and
mail
notification
to
newspapers,
radio
and
TV
stations.
Newspapers
are
assumed
to
run
the
public
education
materials
as
a
public
service
announcement,
free
of
charge.
Systems
are
assumed
to
incur
a
postage
cost
of
$
0.33
per
mailing.
June
1999
D­
41
NTNCWSs
­
BASELINE
AND
LCRMR
PUBLIC
EDUCATION
MODELS:
Burdens
and
Costs
to
Deliver
Public
Education
System
Size
Total
Number
of
NTNCWSs
Number
of
NTNCWSs
Required
to
Conduct
Public
Edu.
1
Average
Number
of
Handouts
per
System2
Cost
per
Piece3
Cost
per
System
for
Handouts
($)
Labor
per
System
for
Posting
(
hrs)
4
Labor
per
System
for
Posting
($)
Total
Cost
per
System
($)
Total
Burden
(
all
systems)

(
hrs)
Total
Cost
(
all
systems)

($
1,000'
s)

25­
100
10,213
638
52
$
0.27
$
14.04
0.5
$
7.15
$
21.19
319.0
$
13.52
101­
500
7,389
462
259
$
0.27
$
69.93
0.5
$
7.15
$
77.08
231.0
$
35.61
501­
1K
2,024
127
725
$
0.27
$
195.75
0.5
$
7.15
$
202.90
63.5
$
25.77
1K­
3.3K
744
47
1,653
$
0.24
$
396.72
0.5
$
7.15
$
403.87
23.5
$
18.98
3.3K­
10K
80
4
5,212
$
0.19
$
990.28
0.5
$
8.35
$
998.63
2.0
$
3.99
10K­
25K
14
1
15,160
$
0.19
$
2,880.40
0.5
$
8.35
$
2,888.75
0.5
$
2.89
25K­
50K
5
0
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
50K­
75K
0
0
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
75K­
100K
1
0
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
100K­
500K
0
0
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
500K­
1M
0
0
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
>
1M
0
0
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
Total
20,470
1,279
639.5
$
100.76
1.
No
NTNCWSs
>
50,000
will
be
required
to
conduct
public
education.
Based
on
the
January
1997
inventory
numbers,
only
1
NTNCWS
serves
>
50,000
people
and
it
is
assumed
to
be
below
the
lead
action
level.

2.
The
number
of
handouts
(
i.
e.,
brochures/
pamphlets)
is
assumed
to
equal
the
average
population
served
for
each
of
the
12
size
categories.

3.
Costs
were
based
on
non­
member
prices
listed
in
the
1998
AWWA
bookstore
catalogue.

4.
0.5
hours
of
labor
per
year
are
assumed
to
distribute
handouts
and
to
post
in
central
locations.
June
1999
D­
42
SUMMARY
OF
PUBLIC
EDUCATION
BURDENS
AND
COSTS
FOR
CWSs
AND
NTNCWSs
System
Size
BASELINE
LCRMR
DIFFERENCE
(
REVISED
­
BASELINE)

Total
Burden
(
Hours)
Total
Cost
(
Thousands)
Total
Burden
(
Hours)
Total
Cost
(
Thousands)
Total
Burden
(
Hours)
Total
Cost
(
Thousands)

25­
100
12,046.6
$
195.25
9,984.6
$
163.75
(
2,062.0)
($
31.51)

101­
500
12,390.9
$
259.55
10,252.9
$
226.88
(
2,138.0)
($
32.67)

501­
1K
6,549.5
$
165.83
5,813.5
$
154.58
(
736.0)
($
11.25)

1K­
3.3K
9,100.4
$
315.53
8,070.4
$
299.79
(
1,030.0)
($
15.74)

3.3K­
10K
8,376.0
$
341.93
8,376.0
$
341.93
0.0
$
0.00
10K­
25K
3,792.5
$
269.05
3,792.5
$
269.05
0.0
$
0.00
25K­
50K
1,698.5
$
229.83
1,698.5
$
229.83
0.0
$
0.00
50K­
75K
553.0
$
122.10
553.0
$
122.10
0.0
$
0.00
75K­
100K
237.0
$
71.65
237.0
$
71.65
0.0
$
0.00
100K­
500K
553.0
$
341.45
553.0
$
341.45
0.0
$
0.00
500K­
1M
39.5
$
83.39
39.5
$
83.39
0.0
$
0.00
>
1M
39.5
$
249.52
39.5
$
249.52
0.0
$
0.00
Total
55,376.4
$
2,645.07
49,410.4
$
2,553.91
(
5,966.0)
($
91.16)
June
1999
D­
43
SYSTEM
REPORTING
MODELS
The
baseline
and
LCRMR
System
Reporting
Schedules
present
the
total
number
of
reporting
events
per
year
for
all
systems
during
1999
­
2009
for
each
of
the
possible
reporting
requirements.
The
reporting
models
correspond
to
the
schedules
developed
for
each
monitoring
model
and
the
public
education
models.
In
addition,
the
reporting
models
assume
that
some
of
the
reporting
requirements
under
the
LCR
and
LCRMR
will
have
occurred
prior
to
1999
and
thus,
are
not
included
in
the
burden
and
costs
summaries.
These
requirements
are:
optimal
corrosion
control
treatment
recommendation,
corrosion
control
study
submission,
certification
that
corrosion
control
treatment
has
been
installed,
and
certification
that
source
water
treatment
has
been
installed.

The
per
event
system
burden
varies
for
each
reporting
requirement.
The
burden
per
reporting
requirement
is
derived
by
multiplying
the
number
of
events
by
the
per
unit
burden.
The
cost
per
reporting
requirement
is
estimated
by
multiplying
the
system
labor
rate
of
$
14.29
for
systems
serving
3,300
or
fewer
people
or
$
16.69
for
systems
serving
more
than
3,300
people
by
the
burden.
In
addition,
for
both
reporting
models,
a
postage
cost
of
$
0.33
is
applied
to
the
reporting
of:
lead
and
copper
monitoring
data,
WQP
monitoring
data,
source
water
monitoring
results,
public
education
compliance
letter,
and
the
annual
lead
service
line
letter.
Additional
categories
that
require
separate
postage
in
the
LCRMR
model
are:
monitoring
waiver
application;
demonstration
of
representative
entry
points
for
WQPs,
and
partial
lead
service
line
replacement
monitoring
results/
demonstration
of
compliance
with
notification
requirements.
No
mailing
costs
are
assigned
to
changes
in
monitoring
location,
sample
site
justification
or
certifications,
request
for
reduced
monitoring,
or
changes
in
treatment/
addition
of
a
new
source.
This
information
is
assumed
to
be
submitted
with
the
lead
and
copper
monitoring
data.

Burden
and
cost
summaries
for
the
baseline
model,
LCRMR
model,
and
the
difference
between
the
two
models
are
presented
after
the
number
of
events
tables.
The
activity
in
the
LCRMR
model,
entitled,
"
Calculation
of
90th
Percentile
Levels
and
Reporting
of
Lead
and
Copper
Data"
is
comprised
of
four
provisions:
the
calculation
of
the
90th
percentile
levels
by
the
State
for
some
systems,
continued
lead
and
copper
tap
monitoring
by
(
b)(
3)
systems,
and
the
submission
of
fewer
monitoring
results
due
to
accelerated
reduced
lead
and
copper
monitoring
and
monitoring
waivers.
June
1999
D­
44
BASELINE
LCR
SYSTEM
REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS:
Number
of
Events
System
Size
&
Activities
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Calculation
of
90th
Percentile
Values
and
Reporting
of
Lead
and
Copper
Monitoring
Data
25­
100
Routine
5,508
2,003
501
Reduced
23,201
6,009
3,004
20,697
5,008
1,502
20,196
5,008
1,502
20,196
5,008
101­
500
Routine
5,049
1,836
459
Reduced
21,272
5,509
2,755
18,976
4,591
1,377
18,517
4,591
1,377
18,517
4,591
501­
3.3K
Routine
3,487
1,268
317
Reduced
14,683
3,803
1,901
13,099
3,169
951
12,782
3,169
951
12,782
3,169
3.3K­
10K
Routine
67
67
Reduced
1,014
406
3,310
675
406
3,242
675
406
3,242
675
406
10K­
50K
Routine
44
44
Reduced
654
262
2,139
436
262
2,096
436
262
2,096
436
262
50K­
100K
Routine
312
Reduced
312
312
0
312
0
312
0
>
100K
Routine
252
Reduced
252
252
0
252
0
252
0
WQP
Monitoring
Results
25­
100
2,504
3,505
4,006
4,006
4,006
4,006
4,006
4,006
4,006
4,006
4,006
101­
500
2,296
3,214
3,673
3,673
3,673
3,673
3,673
3,673
3,673
3,673
3,673
501­
3.3K
1,585
2,218
2,535
2,535
2,535
2,535
2,535
2,535
2,535
2,535
2,535
3.3K­
50K
779
890
890
890
890
890
890
890
890
890
890
>
50K
1,128
1,128
1,128
1,128
1,128
1,128
1,128
1,128
1,128
1,128
1,128
Changes
in
Lead
and
Copper
Tap
Monitoring
Location
25­
100
8,865
2,474
1,082
6,391
1,546
464
6,237
1,546
464
6,237
1,546
101­
500
9,189
2,564
1,122
6,625
1,603
481
6,464
1,603
481
6,464
1,603
501­
3.3K
7,597
2,120
928
5,477
1,325
397
5,344
1,325
397
5,344
1,325
3.3K­
50K
877
384
2,687
548
329
2,632
548
329
2,632
548
329
June
1999
BASELINE
LCR
SYSTEM
REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS:
Number
of
Events
System
Size
&
Activities
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
D­
45
>
50K
282
367
282
86
282
86
282
86
Request
for
Reduced
Lead
and
Copper
Monitoring
25­
100
1,502
501
1,502
501
101­
500
1,377
459
1,377
459
501­
3.3K
951
317
951
317
3.3K­
50K
445
111
>
50K
564
564
Source
Water
Monitoring
Results/
Recommendation
25­
100
203
118
2,003
113
113
1,998
113
113
1,917
113
113
101­
500
297
172
1,837
166
166
1,831
166
166
1,781
166
166
501­
3.3K
503
291
1,267
282
282
1,258
282
282
1,224
282
282
3.3K­
50K
206
444
195
195
433
195
195
444
195
195
420
>
50K
46
203
29
46
46
29
42
200
29
42
200
Public
Education
Compliance
Letter
25­
100
2,921
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
101­
500
2,678
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
501­
3.3K
1,849
1,056
1,056
1,056
1,056
1,056
1,056
1,056
1,056
1,056
1,056
3.3K­
50K
356
356
356
356
356
356
356
356
356
356
356
>
50K
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
Annual
Lead
Service
Line
Letter
25­
100
174
232
232
232
232
232
232
232
232
232
232
101­
500
159
213
213
213
213
213
213
213
213
213
213
501­
3.3K
110
147
147
147
147
147
147
147
147
147
147
3.3K­
50K
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
>
50K
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
BASELINE
LCR
REPORTING
TOTAL
EVENTS
25­
100
43,376
17,513
12,998
34,610
13,075
9,871
32,453
12,574
9,790
32,453
12,574
101­
500
40,940
16,415
12,048
32,560
12,235
9,105
30,563
11,776
9,055
30,563
11,776
501­
3.3K
29,813
11,854
8,469
23,547
8,832
6,345
22,147
8,515
6,311
22,147
8,515
3.3K­
50K
4,147
3,448
9,727
3,361
2,826
9,561
3,250
2,837
9,561
3,250
2,813
>
50K
2,641
2,319
2,624
1,231
1,317
2,060
1,227
1,471
2,060
1,227
1,471
Total
All
Sizes
120,917
51,549
45,866
95,310
38,285
36,942
89,640
37,173
36,777
89,640
37,149
June
1999
1
Rout./
Full
represents
a
system
on
routine
monitoring
that
is
required
to
calculate
its
90th
percentile
levels;
Red./
Full
are
those
system
on
reduced
monitoring
that
are
required
to
calculate
their
90th
percentile
levels.
Rout./
L.
O.
=
routine/
letter
only
and
are
systems
on
routine
monitoring
for
which
the
State
will
perform
the
90th
percentile
calculation;
Red./
L.
O.
=
systems
on
reduced
monitoring
for
which
the
State
will
calculate
the
90th
percentile
levels.

D­
46
LCRMR
REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS:
Number
of
Events
System
Size
&
Activities
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Calculation
of
90th
Percentile
Values
and
Reporting
of
Lead
and
Copper
Monitoring
Data1
25­
100
Rout.
/
Full
2,754
1,002
251
Rout.
/
L.
O.
2,754
1,002
251
Red.
/
Full
9,665
2,203
1,903
9,214
1,903
1,152
10,299
1,903
1,152
8,763
1,903
Red.
/
L.
O.
9,665
2,203
1,903
9,214
1,903
1,152
10,299
1,903
1,152
8,763
1,903
101­
500
Rout.
/
Full
2,525
918
230
Rout.
/
L.
O.
2,525
918
230
Red.
/
Full
8,861
2,020
1,745
8,448
1,745
1,056
9,442
1,745
1,056
8,034
1,745
Red.
/
L.
O.
8,861
2,020
1,745
8,448
1,745
1,056
9,442
1,745
1,056
8,034
1,745
501­
3.3K
Rout.
/
Full
1,744
634
159
Rout.
/
L.
O.
1,744
634
159
Red.
/
Full
6,117
1,395
1,204
5,832
1,205
729
6,518
1,205
729
5,546
1,205
Red.
/
L.
O.
6,117
1,395
1,204
5,832
1,205
729
6,518
1,205
729
5,546
1,205
3.3K­
10K
Rout.
/
Full
34
34
0
0
0
0
0
0
Rout.
/
L.
O.
34
34
0
0
0
0
0
0
Red.
/
Full
399
176
1,763
257
176
1,729
257
176
1,729
257
176
Red.
/
L.
O.
399
176
1,763
257
176
1,729
257
176
1,729
257
176
10K­
50K
Rout./
Full
22
22
Rout/
L.
O
22
22
Red.
/
Full
258
114
1,140
166
114
1,118
166
114
1,118
166
114
Red.
/
L.
O.
258
114
1,140
166
114
1,118
166
114
1,118
166
114
50K­
100K
Rout.
/
Full
125
0
0
0
0
Rout.
/
L.
O.
125
0
0
0
0
June
1999
LCRMR
REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS:
Number
of
Events
System
Size
&
Activities
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
D­
47
Red.
/
Full
0
172
156
0
47
156
0
47
156
0
47
Red.
/
L.
O.
0
172
156
0
47
156
0
47
156
0
47
>
100K
Rout.
/
Full
101
Rout.
/
L.
O.
101
Red.
/
Full
0
139
126
0
39
126
0
39
126
0
39
Red.
/
L.
O.
0
139
126
0
39
126
0
39
126
0
39
WQP
Monitoring
Results
25­
100
2,504
3,505
4,006
4,006
4,006
4,006
4,006
4,006
4,006
4,006
4,006
101­
500
2,296
3,214
3,673
3,673
3,673
3,673
3,673
3,673
3,673
3,673
3,673
501­
3.3K
1,585
2,218
2,535
2,535
2,535
2,535
2,535
2,535
2,535
2,535
2,535
3.3K­
50K
779
890
890
890
890
890
890
890
890
890
890
>
50K
1,128
1,128
1,128
1,128
1,128
1,128
1,128
1,128
1,128
1,128
1,128
Changes
in
Lead
and
Copper
Tap
Monitoring
Location
25­
100
8,704
1,979
1,330
5,690
1,175
711
6,360
1,175
711
6,141
1,175
101­
500
7,978
2,052
1,378
5,898
1,218
737
6,593
1,218
737
5,631
1,218
501­
3.3K
5,509
1,696
1,140
4,876
1,007
610
5,450
1,007
610
3,887
1,007
3.3K­
50K
702
341
2,862
416
286
2,806
416
286
2,806
416
286
>
50K
226
311
282
0
86
282
0
86
282
0
86
Request
for
Reduced
Lead
and
Copper
Monitoring
25­
100
0
0
0
0
101­
500
0
0
0
0
501­
3.3K
0
0
0
0
3.3K­
50K
0
0
>
50K
0
0
Eliminate
Sample
Site
Justification
25­
100
8,703
2,246
1,509
6,457
1,333
807
7,218
1,333
807
6,141
1,333
101­
500
7,979
2,059
1,384
5,920
1,223
740
6,617
1,223
740
5,631
1,223
501­
3.3K
5,508
1,422
955
4,087
844
511
4,568
844
511
3,887
844
3.3K­
50K
702
341
2,862
416
286
2,806
416
286
2,806
416
286
>
50K
226
311
282
0
86
282
0
86
282
0
86
Source
Water
Monitoring
Results/
Recommendation
25­
100
5
5
1,890
0
0
81
0
0
113
0
0
June
1999
LCRMR
REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS:
Number
of
Events
System
Size
&
Activities
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
D­
48
101­
500
6
6
1,671
0
0
50
0
0
166
0
0
501­
3.3K
9
9
985
0
0
34
0
0
282
0
0
3.3K­
50K
11
249
0
0
13
0
0
24
195
0
225
>
50K
17
174
0
4
172
0
0
171
29
13
171
Public
Education
Compliance
Letter
25­
100
2,921
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
101­
500
2,678
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
501­
3.3K
1,849
1,057
1,057
1,057
1,057
1,057
1,057
1,057
1,057
1,057
1,057
3.3K­
50K
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
>
50K
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
Annual
Lead
Service
Line
Letter
25­
100
174
232
232
232
232
232
232
232
232
232
232
101­
500
159
213
213
213
213
213
213
213
213
213
213
501­
3.3K
110
147
147
147
147
147
147
147
147
147
147
3.3K­
50K
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
>
50K
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Explanation
of
Changes
in
Treatment
or
Addition
of
A
New
Source
for
Systems
on
Reduced
Monitoring
25­
100
386
88
76
369
76
46
412
76
46
350
76
101­
500
354
81
70
338
70
42
378
70
42
321
70
501­
3.3K
244
56
48
233
48
29
261
48
29
222
48
3.3K­
50K
26
12
116
17
12
114
17
12
114
17
12
>
50K
12
11
3
11
3
11
11
Monitoring
Waiver
Application
25­
100
2,671
2,671
0
101­
500
2,448
2,448
0
501­
3.3K
1,690
1,690
0
3.3K­
50K
Not
Applicable
>
50K
Eliminate
First­
Draw
and
Customer­
Collected
Certifications
25­
100
24,837
6,409
4,306
18,427
3,806
2,303
20,597
3,806
2,303
17,526
3,806
101­
500
22,770
5,876
3,948
16,895
3,489
2,111
18,884
3,489
2,111
16,068
3,489
501­
3.3K
15,720
4,057
2,725
11,663
2,409
1,458
13,036
2,409
1,458
11,092
2,409
3.3K­
50K
1,423
691
5,804
844
580
5,692
844
580
5,692
844
580
June
1999
LCRMR
REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS:
Number
of
Events
System
Size
&
Activities
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
D­
49
>
50K
451
622
564
0
171
564
0
171
564
0
171
Demonstration
of
Representative
Entry
Points
for
Ground
Water
Systems
25­
100
Models
assumed
to
not
apply
to
small
systems
101­
500
501­
3.3K
3.3K­
50K
240
>
50K
157
Reporting
of
Partial
LSLR
25­
100
623
829
829
829
829
829
829
829
829
829
829
101­
500
908
1,208
1,208
1,208
1,208
1,208
1,208
1,208
1,208
1,208
1,208
501­
3.3K
1,466
1,950
1,950
1,950
1,950
1,950
1,950
1,950
1,950
1,950
1,950
3.3K­
50K
1,008
1,008
1,008
1,008
1,008
1,008
1,008
1,008
1,008
1,008
1,008
>
50K
144
144
144
144
144
144
144
144
144
144
144
LCRMR
REPORTING
TOTAL
EVENTS
25­
100
76,365
23,372
20,154
56,106
16,933
12,988
64,590
16,933
13,020
57,092
16,933
101­
500
50,330
17,240
15,325
35,675
12,623
10,304
41,544
12,623
10,420
36,723
12,623
501­
3.3K
36,444
13,613
11,793
26,548
9,997
8,331
30,694
9,997
8,579
26,467
9,997
3.3K­
50K
15,413
6,592
16,302
13,662
5,835
15,325
14,747
5,846
15,520
13,211
6,047
>
50K
25,213
8,672
6,453
18,265
5,373
4,616
20,250
5,372
4,645
17,447
5,380
Total
All
Sizes
183,084
63,280
67,121
141,042
48,858
50,412
161,526
48,868
51,032
142,176
49,077
June
1999
D­
50
BASELINE
LCR
REPORTING
COSTS
ALL
SYSTEMS,
All
$
Totals
in
Thousands
System
Size
&
Activities
Burden
per
Event
(
hours)
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
Calculation
of
90th
Percentile
Value
and
Reporting
of
Lead
and
Copper
Monitoring
Data
25­
100
Routine
1.50
$
119.9
$
43.6
$
10.9
$
0.0
$
0.0
$
0.0
$
0.0
$
0.0
$
0.0
$
0.0
$
0.0
$
174.4
Reduced
1.50
505.0
130.8
65.4
450.5
109.0
32.7
439.6
109.0
32.7
439.6
109.0
2,423.1
101­
500
Routine
1.75
127.9
46.5
11.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
186.1
Reduced
1.50
463.0
119.9
60.0
413.0
99.9
30.0
403.0
99.9
30.0
403.0
99.9
2,221.6
501­
3.3K
Routine
2.00
100.8
36.7
9.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
146.6
Reduced
1.50
319.6
82.8
41.4
285.1
69.0
20.7
278.2
69.0
20.7
278.2
69.0
1,533.5
3.3K­
10K
Routine
2.00
2.3
2.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.5
Reduced
1.50
25.7
10.3
84.0
17.1
10.3
82.2
17.1
10.3
82.2
17.1
10.3
366.7
10K­
50K
Routine
2.50
1.9
1.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.7
Reduced
1.75
19.3
7.7
63.2
12.9
7.7
61.9
12.9
7.7
61.9
12.9
7.7
275.9
50K­
100K
Routine
2.50
13.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13.1
Reduced
1.75
0.0
9.2
9.2
0.0
0.0
9.2
0.0
0.0
9.2
0.0
0.0
36.9
>
100K
Routine
3.00
12.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12.7
Reduced
2.00
0.0
8.5
8.5
0.0
0.0
8.5
0.0
0.0
8.5
0.0
0.0
34.0
June
1999
BASELINE
LCR
REPORTING
COSTS
ALL
SYSTEMS,
All
$
Totals
in
Thousands
System
Size
&
Activities
Burden
per
Event
(
hours)
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
D­
51
WQP
Monitoring
Results
25­
100
4.00
143.9
201.5
230.3
230.3
230.3
230.3
230.3
230.3
230.3
230.3
230.3
2,418.2
101­
500
4.00
132.0
184.7
211.1
211.1
211.1
211.1
211.1
211.1
211.1
211.1
211.1
2,217.0
501­
3.3K
4.00
91.1
127.5
145.8
145.8
145.8
145.8
145.8
145.8
145.8
145.8
145.8
1,530.4
3.3K­
50K
4.00
52.3
59.7
59.7
59.7
59.7
59.7
59.7
59.7
59.7
59.7
59.7
649.4
>
50K
4.00
75.7
75.7
75.7
75.7
75.7
75.7
75.7
75.7
75.7
75.7
75.7
832.5
Changes
in
Lead
and
Copper
Tap
Monitoring
Location
25­
100
1.00
126.7
35.4
15.5
91.3
22.1
6.6
89.1
22.1
6.6
89.1
22.1
526.6
101­
500
1.00
131.3
36.6
16.0
94.7
22.9
6.9
92.4
22.9
6.9
92.4
22.9
545.9
501­
3.3K
1.00
108.6
30.3
13.3
78.3
18.9
5.7
76.4
18.9
5.7
76.4
18.9
451.3
3.3K­
50K
1.00
14.6
6.4
44.8
9.1
5.5
43.9
9.1
5.5
43.9
9.1
5.5
197.7
>
50K
1.00
4.7
6.1
4.7
0.0
1.4
4.7
0.0
1.4
4.7
0.0
1.4
29.3
Request
for
Reduced
Lead
and
Copper
Monitoring
25­
100
1.00
0.0
21.5
7.2
21.5
7.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
57.2
101­
500
1.00
0.0
19.7
6.6
19.7
6.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
52.5
501­
3.3K
1.00
0.0
13.6
4.5
13.6
4.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
36.2
3.3K­
50K
1.00
0.0
7.4
0.0
1.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.3
>
50K
1.00
9.4
0.0
9.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
18.8
Source
Water
Monitoring
Results/
Recommendation
25­
100
0.50
1.5
0.9
15.0
0.8
0.8
14.9
0.8
0.8
14.3
0.8
0.8
51.7
101­
500
0.50
2.2
1.3
13.7
1.2
1.2
13.7
1.2
1.2
13.3
1.2
1.2
51.7
501­
3.3K
0.50
3.8
2.2
9.5
2.1
2.1
9.4
2.1
2.1
9.1
2.1
2.1
46.6
June
1999
BASELINE
LCR
REPORTING
COSTS
ALL
SYSTEMS,
All
$
Totals
in
Thousands
System
Size
&
Activities
Burden
per
Event
(
hours)
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
D­
52
3.3K­
50K
0.50
1.8
3.9
1.7
1.7
3.8
1.7
1.7
3.9
1.7
1.7
3.6
27.0
>
50K
0.50
0.4
1.8
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
1.7
0.3
0.4
1.7
7.9
Public
Education
Compliance
Letter
25­
100
1.00
42.7
24.4
24.4
24.4
24.4
24.4
24.4
24.4
24.4
24.4
24.4
286.7
101­
500
1.00
39.2
22.4
22.4
22.4
22.4
22.4
22.4
22.4
22.4
22.4
22.4
262.9
501­
3.3K
1.00
27.0
15.4
15.4
15.4
15.4
15.4
15.4
15.4
15.4
15.4
15.4
181.5
3.3K­
50K
1.00
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
66.7
>
50K
1.00
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
6.9
Annual
Lead
Service
Line
Letter
25­
100
0.50
1.3
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
18.7
101­
500
0.50
1.2
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
17.1
501­
3.3K
0.50
0.8
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
11.8
3.3K­
50K
0.50
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
14.3
>
50K
0.50
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
1.9
BASELINE
LCR
REPORTING
TOTAL
COST
25­
100
941.0
459.7
370.3
820.5
395.5
310.7
786.0
388.4
310.1
786.0
388.4
5,956.6
101­
500
896.8
432.7
343.0
763.7
365.7
285.6
731.7
359.2
285.3
731.7
359.2
5,554.8
501­
3.3K
651.7
309.6
240.1
541.4
256.8
198.1
519.0
252.3
197.8
519.0
252.3
3,938.0
3.3K­
50K
125.2
106.9
260.7
109.8
94.4
256.8
107.9
94.5
256.8
107.9
94.2
1,615.1
>
50K
116.8
102.1
108.6
76.9
78.3
99.1
76.8
79.7
99.1
76.8
79.7
993.9
Total
2,731.4
1,411.0
1,322.8
2,312.3
1,190.8
1,150.4
2,221.4
1,174.0
1,149.2
2,221.4
1,173.8
18,058.5
June
1999
D­
53
BASELINE
LCR
SYSTEM
REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS:
Burden
ALL
SYSTEMS,
Burden
in
hours
System
Size
&
Activities
Burden
per
Event
(
hours)
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
Calculation
of
90th
Percentile
Levels
and
Reporting
of
Lead
and
Copper
Monitoring
Data
25­
100
Routine
1.50
8,262
3,005
752
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12,018
Reduced
1.50
34,802
9,014
4,506
31,046
7,512
2,253
30,294
7,512
2,253
30,294
7,512
166,997
101­
500
Routine
1.75
8,836
3,213
803
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12,852
Reduced
1.50
31,908
8,264
4,133
28,464
6,887
2,066
27,776
6,887
2,066
27,776
6,887
153,110
501­
3.3K
Routine
2.00
6,974
2,536
634
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10,144
Reduced
1.50
22,025
5,705
2,852
19,649
4,754
1,427
19,173
4,754
1,427
19,173
4,754
105,689
3.3K­
10K
Routine
2.00
134
134
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
268
Reduced
1.50
1,521
609
4,965
1,013
609
4,863
1,013
609
4,863
1,013
609
21,686
10K­
50K
Routine
2.50
110
110
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
220
Reduced
1.75
1,145
459
3,743
763
459
3,668
763
459
3,668
763
459
16,347
50K­
100K
Routine
2.50
780
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
780
Reduced
1.75
0
546
546
0
0
546
0
0
546
0
0
2,184
>
100K
Routine
3.00
756
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
756
Reduced
2.00
0
504
504
0
0
504
0
0
504
0
0
2,016
June
1999
BASELINE
LCR
SYSTEM
REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS:
Burden
ALL
SYSTEMS,
Burden
in
hours
System
Size
&
Activities
Burden
per
Event
(
hours)
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
D­
54
WQP
Monitoring
Results
25­
100
4.00
10,015
14,020
16,024
16,024
16,024
16,024
16,024
16,024
16,024
16,024
16,024
168,249
101­
500
4.00
9,182
12,854
14,691
14,691
14,691
14,691
14,691
14,691
14,691
14,691
14,691
154,256
501­
3.3K
4.00
6,339
8,873
10,141
10,141
10,141
10,141
10,141
10,141
10,141
10,141
10,141
106,483
3.3K­
50K
4.00
3,116
3,560
3,560
3,560
3,560
3,560
3,560
3,560
3,560
3,560
3,560
38,716
>
50K
4.00
4,512
4,512
4,512
4,512
4,512
4,512
4,512
4,512
4,512
4,512
4,512
49,632
Changes
in
Lead
and
Copper
Tap
Monitoring
Location
25­
100
1.00
8,865
2,474
1,082
6,391
1,546
464
6,237
1,546
464
6,237
1,546
36,852
101­
500
1.00
9,189
2,564
1,122
6,625
1,603
481
6,464
1,603
481
6,464
1,603
38,199
501­
3.3K
1.00
7,597
2,120
928
5,477
1,325
397
5,344
1,325
397
5,344
1,325
31,579
3.3K­
50K
1.00
877
384
2,687
548
329
2,632
548
329
2,632
548
329
11,843
>
50K
1.00
282
367
282
0
86
282
0
86
282
0
86
1,753
Request
for
Reduced
Lead
and
Copper
Monitoring
25­
100
1.00
0
1,502
501
1,502
501
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,006
101­
500
1.00
0
1,377
459
1,377
459
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,673
501­
3.3K
1.00
0
951
317
951
317
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,535
3.3K­
50K
1.00
0
445
0
111
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
556
>
50K
1.00
564
0
564
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,128
Source
Water
Monitoring
Results/
Recommendation
25­
100
0.50
102
59
1,002
57
57
999
57
57
959
57
57
3,459
101­
500
0.50
149
86
919
83
83
916
83
83
891
83
83
3,457
501­
3.3K
0.50
252
146
634
141
141
629
141
141
612
141
141
3,118
June
1999
BASELINE
LCR
SYSTEM
REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS:
Burden
ALL
SYSTEMS,
Burden
in
hours
System
Size
&
Activities
Burden
per
Event
(
hours)
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
D­
55
3.3K­
50K
0.50
103
222
98
98
217
98
98
222
98
98
210
1,559
>
50K
0.50
23
102
15
23
23
15
21
100
15
21
100
456
Public
Education
Compliance
Letter
25­
100
1.00
2,921
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
19,613
101­
500
1.00
2,678
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
17,982
501­
3.3K
1.00
1,849
1,056
1,056
1,056
1,056
1,056
1,056
1,056
1,056
1,056
1,056
12,413
3.3K­
50K
1.00
356
356
356
356
356
356
356
356
356
356
356
3,916
>
50K
1.00
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
407
Annual
Lead
Service
Line
Letter
25­
100
0.50
87
116
116
116
116
116
116
116
116
116
116
1,248
101­
500
0.50
80
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
1,144
501­
3.3K
0.50
55
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
790
3.3K­
50K
0.50
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
825
>
50K
0.50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
110
BASELINE
LCR
REPORTING
TOTAL
BURDEN
25­
100
65,053
31,859
25,651
56,804
27,424
21,525
54,396
26,923
21,484
54,396
26,923
412,440
101­
500
62,021
29,995
23,763
52,877
25,360
19,790
50,650
24,900
19,765
50,650
24,900
384,672
501­
3.3K
45,089
21,460
16,635
37,488
17,808
13,724
35,929
17,491
13,707
35,929
17,491
272,750
3.3K­
50K
7,437
6,354
15,484
6,523
5,604
15,252
6,412
5,610
15,252
6,412
5,598
95,935
>
50K
6,964
6,078
6,470
4,582
4,668
5,906
4,580
4,745
5,906
4,580
4,745
59,222
Total
186,564
95,745
88,003
158,275
80,864
76,196
151,968
79,669
76,113
151,968
79,657
1,225,020
June
1999
D­
56
LCRMR
REPORTING
COSTS
ALL
SYSTEMS,
All
$
Totals
in
Thousands
System
Size
&
Activities
Burden
per
Event
(
hours)
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
Calculation
of
90th
Percentile
Values
and
Reporting
of
Lead
and
Copper
Monitoring
Data
25­
100
Rout.
/
Full
1.5
$
59.9
$
21.8
$
5.5
$
0.0
$
0.0
$
0.0
$
0.0
$
0.0
$
0.0
$
0.0
$
0.0
$
87.2
Rout.
/
L.
O.
1
40.3
14.6
3.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
58.6
Red.
/
Full
1.5
210.3
47.9
41.4
200.5
41.4
25.1
224.1
41.4
25.1
190.7
41.4
1,089.5
Red.
/
L.
O.
1
141.3
32.2
27.8
134.7
27.8
16.8
150.6
27.8
16.8
128.1
27.8
731.8
101­
500
Rout.
/
Full
1.75
64.0
23.3
5.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
93.0
Rout.
/
L.
O.
1
36.9
13.4
3.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
53.7
Red.
/
Full
1.5
192.8
44.0
38.0
183.9
38.0
23.0
205.5
38.0
23.0
174.9
38.0
998.9
Red.
/
L.
O.
1
129.5
29.5
25.5
123.5
25.5
15.4
138.0
25.5
15.4
117.5
25.5
671.0
501­
3.3K
Rout.
/
Full
2
50.4
18.3
4.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
73.3
Rout.
/
L.
O.
1
25.5
9.3
2.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
37.1
Red./
Full
1.5
133.1
30.4
26.2
126.9
26.2
15.9
141.9
26.2
15.9
120.7
26.2
689.6
Red.
/
L.
O.
1
89.4
20.4
17.6
85.3
17.6
10.7
95.3
17.6
10.7
81.1
17.6
463.2
3.3K­
10K
Rout.
/
Full
2
1.1
1.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.3
Rout.
/
L.
O.
1
0.6
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.1
Red./
Full
1.5
10.1
4.5
44.7
6.5
4.5
43.8
6.5
4.5
43.8
6.5
4.5
179.9
Red.
/
L.
O.
1
6.8
3.0
30.0
4.4
3.0
29.4
4.4
3.0
29.4
4.4
3.0
120.7
10K­
50K
June
1999
LCRMR
REPORTING
COSTS
ALL
SYSTEMS,
All
$
Totals
in
Thousands
System
Size
&
Activities
Burden
per
Event
(
hours)
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
D­
57
Rout.
/
Full
2.5
0.9
0.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.9
Rout.
/
L.
O.
1
0.4
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.7
Red./
Full
1.75
7.6
3.4
33.7
4.9
3.4
33.0
4.9
3.4
33.0
4.9
3.4
135.4
Red./
L.
O.
1
4.4
1.9
19.4
2.8
1.9
19.0
2.8
1.9
19.0
2.8
1.9
78.0
50K­
100K
Rout.
/
Full
2.5
5.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.2
Rout.
/
L.
O.
1
2.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.1
Red./
Full
1.75
0.0
5.1
4.6
0.0
1.4
4.6
0.0
1.4
4.6
0.0
1.4
23.1
Red.
/
L.
O.
1
0.0
2.9
2.7
0.0
0.8
2.7
0.0
0.8
2.7
0.0
0.8
13.3
>
100K
Rout.
/
Full
3
5.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.1
Rout.
/
L.
O.
1
1.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.7
Red.
/
Full
2
0.0
4.7
4.2
0.0
1.3
4.2
0.0
1.3
4.2
0.0
1.3
21.3
Red.
/
L.
O.
1
0.0
2.4
2.1
0.0
0.7
2.1
0.0
0.7
2.1
0.0
0.7
10.8
WQP
Monitoring
Results
25­
100
4.33
155.8
218.0
249.2
249.2
249.2
249.2
249.2
249.2
249.2
249.2
249.2
2,616.5
101­
500
4.33
142.8
199.9
228.5
228.5
228.5
228.5
228.5
228.5
228.5
228.5
228.5
2,398.9
501­
3.3K
4.33
98.6
138.0
157.7
157.7
157.7
157.7
157.7
157.7
157.7
157.7
157.7
1,656.0
3.3K­
50K
4.33
56.6
64.6
64.6
64.6
64.6
64.6
64.6
64.6
64.6
64.6
64.6
702.7
>
50K
4.33
81.9
81.9
81.9
81.9
81.9
81.9
81.9
81.9
81.9
81.9
81.9
900.8
Changes
in
Lead
and
Copper
Tap
Monitoring
Location
25­
100
1
124.4
28.3
19.0
81.3
16.8
10.2
90.9
16.8
10.2
87.8
16.8
502.3
June
1999
LCRMR
REPORTING
COSTS
ALL
SYSTEMS,
All
$
Totals
in
Thousands
System
Size
&
Activities
Burden
per
Event
(
hours)
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
D­
58
101­
500
1
114.0
29.3
19.7
84.3
17.4
10.5
94.2
17.4
10.5
80.5
17.4
495.3
501­
3.3K
1
78.7
24.2
16.3
69.7
14.4
8.7
77.9
14.4
8.7
55.5
14.4
383.0
3.3K­
50K
1
11.7
5.7
47.8
6.9
4.8
46.8
6.9
4.8
46.8
6.9
4.8
194.0
>
50K
1
3.8
5.2
4.7
0.0
1.4
4.7
0.0
1.4
4.7
0.0
1.4
27.4
Request
for
Reduced
Lead
and
Copper
Monitoring
25­
100
N/
A
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
101­
500
N/
A
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
501­
3.3K
N/
A
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.3K­
50K
N/
A
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
>
50K
N/
A
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Eliminate
Sample
Site
Justification
25­
100
1
­
17.9
­
4.6
­
3.1
­
13.2
­
2.7
­
1.7
­
14.8
­
2.7
­
1.7
­
12.6
­
2.7
­
77.7
101­
500
1
­
16.4
­
4.2
­
2.8
­
12.1
­
2.5
­
1.5
­
13.6
­
2.5
­
1.5
­
11.6
­
2.5
­
71.3
501­
3.3K
1
­
11.3
­
2.9
­
2.0
­
8.4
­
1.7
­
1.0
­
9.4
­
1.7
­
1.0
­
8.0
­
1.7
­
49.2
3.3K­
50K
1
­
1.7
­
0.8
­
7.0
­
1.0
­
0.7
­
6.9
­
1.0
­
0.7
­
6.9
­
1.0
­
0.7
­
28.5
>
50K
1
­
0.6
­
0.8
­
0.7
0.0
­
0.2
­
0.7
0.0
­
0.2
­
0.7
0.0
­
0.2
­
4.0
Source
Water
Monitoring
Results/
Recommendation
25­
100
0.5
0.0
0.0
14.1
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.8
0.0
0.0
15.7
101­
500
0.5
0.0
0.0
12.5
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
1.2
0.0
0.0
14.2
501­
3.3K
0.5
0.1
0.1
7.4
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
2.1
0.0
0.0
9.9
3.3K­
50K
0.5
0.1
2.2
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
1.7
0.0
2.0
6.2
>
50K
0.5
0.1
1.5
0.0
0.0
1.5
0.0
0.0
1.5
0.3
0.1
1.5
6.5
June
1999
LCRMR
REPORTING
COSTS
ALL
SYSTEMS,
All
$
Totals
in
Thousands
System
Size
&
Activities
Burden
per
Event
(
hours)
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
D­
59
Public
Education
Compliance
Letter
25­
100
1
42.7
24.4
24.4
24.4
24.4
24.4
24.4
24.4
24.4
24.4
24.4
286.7
101­
500
1
39.2
22.4
22.4
22.4
22.4
22.4
22.4
22.4
22.4
22.4
22.4
262.8
501­
3.3K
1
27.0
15.5
15.5
15.5
15.5
15.5
15.5
15.5
15.5
15.5
15.5
181.6
3.3K­
50K
1
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
132.4
>
50K
1
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
13.9
Annual
Lead
Service
Line
Letter
25­
100
0.5
1.3
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
18.7
101­
500
0.5
1.2
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
17.1
501­
3.3K
0.5
0.8
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
11.8
3.3K­
50K
0.5
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
14.3
>
50K
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
1.9
Explanation
of
Changes
in
Treatment
or
Addition
of
A
New
Source
for
Systems
on
Reduced
Monitoring
25­
100
0.5
2.9
0.7
0.6
2.8
0.6
0.3
3.1
0.6
0.3
2.6
0.6
15.0
101­
500
0.5
2.6
0.6
0.5
2.5
0.5
0.3
2.8
0.5
0.3
2.4
0.5
13.7
501­
3.3K
0.5
1.8
0.4
0.4
1.7
0.4
0.2
1.9
0.4
0.2
1.7
0.4
9.5
3.3K­
50K
0.5
0.2
0.1
1.0
0.1
0.1
1.0
0.1
0.1
1.0
0.1
0.1
4.1
>
50K
0.5
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.5
Monitoring
Waiver
Application
25­
100
1
39.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
39.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
78.1
101­
500
1
35.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
35.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
71.6
501­
3.3K
1
24.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
24.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
49.4
June
1999
LCRMR
REPORTING
COSTS
ALL
SYSTEMS,
All
$
Totals
in
Thousands
System
Size
&
Activities
Burden
per
Event
(
hours)
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
D­
60
3.3K­
50K
Not
Applicable
>
50K
Eliminate
First­
Draw
and
Customer­
Collected
Certifications
25­
100
­
0.1667
­
59.2
­
15.3
­
10.3
­
43.9
­
9.1
­
5.5
­
49.1
­
9.1
­
5.5
­
41.7
­
9.1
­
257.5
101­
500
­
0.1667
­
54.2
­
14.0
­
9.4
­
40.2
­
8.3
­
5.0
­
45.0
­
8.3
­
5.0
­
38.3
­
8.3
­
236.1
501­
3.3K
­
0.1667
­
37.4
­
9.7
­
6.5
­
27.8
­
5.7
­
3.5
­
31.0
­
5.7
­
3.5
­
26.4
­
5.7
­
163.0
3.3K­
50K
­
0.1667
­
4.0
­
1.9
­
16.1
­
2.3
­
1.6
­
15.8
­
2.3
­
1.6
­
15.8
­
2.3
­
1.6
­
65.6
>
50K
­
0.1667
­
1.3
­
1.7
­
1.6
0.0
­
0.5
­
1.6
0.0
­
0.5
­
1.6
0.0
­
0.5
­
9.1
Demonstration
of
Representative
Entry
Points
for
Ground
Water
Systems
25­
100
Assumed
not
to
apply
to
small
systems
101­
500
501­
3.3K
3.3K­
50K
1
4.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.1
>
50K
1
2.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.7
Reporting
of
Partial
LSLR
25­
100
0.50
4.7
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
66.6
101­
500
0.50
6.8
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
97.1
501­
3.3K
0.50
11.0
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
156.7
3.3K­
50K
0.50
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
96.2
>
50K
0.50
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
13.7
LCRMR
REPORTING
TOTAL
COST
25­
100
745.6
376.1
380.2
643.7
356.3
327.4
725.4
356.3
327.6
636.4
356.3
5,231.4
June
1999
LCRMR
REPORTING
COSTS
ALL
SYSTEMS,
All
$
Totals
in
Thousands
System
Size
&
Activities
Burden
per
Event
(
hours)
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
D­
61
101­
500
695.1
354.8
354.6
603.2
332.0
304.5
679.3
332.0
305.4
586.8
332.0
4,879.9
501­
3.3K
492.4
259.6
255.1
436.3
239.9
220.0
490.1
239.9
221.9
413.4
239.9
3,508.7
3.3K­
50K
121.0
107.7
240.1
109.0
102.1
237.1
109.0
102.2
238.8
109.0
104.0
1,579.9
>
50K
103.5
103.9
100.8
84.6
91.0
100.8
84.6
91.0
101.0
84.7
91.0
1,036.9
Total
2,157.6
1,202.1
1,330.7
1,876.8
1,121.4
1,189.8
2,088.3
1,121.5
1,194.7
1,830.3
1,123.3
16,236.7
LCRMR
REPORTING
BURDEN
ALL
SYSTEMS,
Burden
in
hours
System
Size
&
Activities
Burden
per
Event
(
hours)
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
Calculation
of
90th
Percentile
Values
and
Reporting
of
Lead
and
Copper
Monitoring
Data
25­
100
Rout.
/
Full
1.5
4,131
1,502
376
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,009
Rout.
/
L.
O.
1
2,754
1,002
251
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,006
Red./
Full
1.5
14,497
3,305
2,854
13,820
2,855
1,727
15,448
2,855
1,727
13,145
2,855
75,086
Red.
/
L.
O.
1
9,665
2,203
1,903
9,214
1,903
1,152
10,299
1,903
1,152
8,763
1,903
50,057
101­
500
Rout.
/
Full
1.75
4,418
1,607
402
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,426
Rout.
/
L.
O.
1
2,525
918
230
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,672
Red./
Full
1.5
13,291
3,030
2,617
12,671
2,617
1,583
14,163
2,617
1,583
12,051
2,617
68,840
Red./
L.
O.
1
8,861
2,020
1,745
8,448
1,745
1,056
9,442
1,745
1,056
8,034
1,745
45,893
501­
3.3K
June
1999
LCRMR
REPORTING
BURDEN
ALL
SYSTEMS,
Burden
in
hours
System
Size
&
Activities
Burden
per
Event
(
hours)
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
D­
62
Rout.
/
Full
2
3,487
1,268
317
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,072
Rout.
/
L.
O.
1
1,744
634
159
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,536
Red./
Full
1.5
9,175
2,092
1,806
8,747
1,807
1,094
9,777
1,807
1,094
8,319
1,807
47,523
Red./
L.
O.
1
6,117
1,395
1,204
5,832
1,205
729
6,518
1,205
729
5,546
1,205
31,682
3.3K­
10K
Rout./
Full
2
67
68
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
135
Rout./
L.
O.
1
34
34
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
68
Red./
Full
1.5
598
264
2,644
385
264
2,593
385
264
2,593
385
264
10,637
Red./
L.
O.
1
399
176
1,763
257
176
1,729
257
176
1,729
257
176
7,092
10K­
50K
Rout.
/
Full
2.5
55
55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
110
Rout.
/
L.
O.
1
22
22
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
44
Red./
Full
1.75
451
200
1,994
290
200
1,956
290
200
1,956
290
200
8,023
Red./
L.
O.
1
258
114
1,140
166
114
1,118
166
114
1,118
166
114
4,585
50K­
100K
Rout./
Full
2.5
311
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
311
Rout./
L.
O.
1
125
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
125
Red./
Full
1.75
0
301
273
0
82
273
0
82
273
0
82
1,367
Red./
L.
O.
1
0
172
156
0
47
156
0
47
156
0
47
781
>
100K
Rout.
/
Full
3
303
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
303
Rout.
/
L.
O.
1
101
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
101
June
1999
LCRMR
REPORTING
BURDEN
ALL
SYSTEMS,
Burden
in
hours
System
Size
&
Activities
Burden
per
Event
(
hours)
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
D­
63
Red./
Full
2
0
278
252
0
77
252
0
77
252
0
77
1,265
Red./
L.
O.
1
0
139
126
0
39
126
0
39
126
0
39
633
WQP
Monitoring
Results
25­
100
4.33
10,841
15,177
17,346
17,346
17,346
17,346
17,346
17,346
17,346
17,346
17,346
182,129
101­
500
4.33
9,940
13,915
15,903
15,903
15,903
15,903
15,903
15,903
15,903
15,903
15,903
166,982
501­
3.3K
4.33
6,861
9,605
10,978
10,978
10,978
10,978
10,978
10,978
10,978
10,978
10,978
115,268
3.3K­
50K
4.33
3,373
3,854
3,854
3,854
3,854
3,854
3,854
3,854
3,854
3,854
3,854
41,910
>
50K
4.33
4,884
4,884
4,884
4,884
4,884
4,884
4,884
4,884
4,884
4,884
4,884
53,727
Changes
in
Lead
and
Copper
Tap
Monitoring
Location
25­
100
1
8,704
1,979
1,330
5,690
1,175
711
6,360
1,175
711
6,141
1,175
35,151
101­
500
1
7,978
2,052
1,378
5,898
1,218
737
6,593
1,218
737
5,631
1,218
34,658
501­
3.3K
1
5,509
1,696
1,140
4,876
1,007
610
5,450
1,007
610
3,887
1,007
26,799
3.3K­
50K
1
702
341
2,862
416
286
2,806
416
286
2,806
416
286
11,623
>
50K
1
226
311
282
0
86
282
0
86
282
0
86
1,641
Request
for
Reduced
Lead
and
Copper
Monitoring
25­
100
N/
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
101­
500
N/
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
501­
3.3K
N/
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.3K­
50K
N/
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>
50K
N/
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Eliminate
Sample
Site
Justification
25­
100
1
­
1,451
­
374
­
252
­
1,076
­
222
­
135
­
1,203
­
222
­
135
­
1,024
­
222
­
6,315
June
1999
LCRMR
REPORTING
BURDEN
ALL
SYSTEMS,
Burden
in
hours
System
Size
&
Activities
Burden
per
Event
(
hours)
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
D­
64
101­
500
1
­
1,330
­
343
­
231
­
987
­
204
­
123
­
1,103
­
204
­
123
­
938
­
204
­
5,790
501­
3.3K
1
­
918
­
237
­
159
­
681
­
141
­
85
­
761
­
141
­
85
­
648
­
141
­
3,997
3.3K­
50K
1
­
117
­
57
­
477
­
69
­
48
­
468
­
69
­
48
­
468
­
69
­
48
­
1,937
>
50K
1
­
38
­
52
­
47
0
­
14
­
47
0
­
14
­
47
0
­
14
­
274
Source
Water
Monitoring
Results/
Recommendation
25­
100
0.5
3
3
945
0
0
41
0
0
57
0
0
1,047
101­
500
0.5
3
3
836
0
0
25
0
0
83
0
0
950
501­
3.3K
0.5
5
5
493
0
0
17
0
0
141
0
0
660
3.3K­
50K
0.5
6
125
0
0
7
0
0
12
98
0
113
359
>
50K
0.5
9
87
0
2
86
0
0
86
15
7
86
376
Public
Education
Compliance
Letter
25­
100
1
2,921
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
1,669
19,611
101­
500
1
2,678
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
1,530
17,978
501­
3.3K
1
1,849
1,057
1,057
1,057
1,057
1,057
1,057
1,057
1,057
1,057
1,057
12,419
3.3K­
50K
1
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
7,777
>
50K
1
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
814
Annual
Lead
Service
Line
Letter
25­
100
0.5
87
116
116
116
116
116
116
116
116
116
116
1,248
101­
500
0.5
80
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
106
1,144
501­
3.3K
0.5
55
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
790
3.3K­
50K
0.5
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
825
>
50K
0.5
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
110
June
1999
LCRMR
REPORTING
BURDEN
ALL
SYSTEMS,
Burden
in
hours
System
Size
&
Activities
Burden
per
Event
(
hours)
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
D­
65
Explanation
of
Changes
in
Treatment
or
Addition
of
A
New
Source
for
Systems
on
Reduced
Monitoring
25­
100
0.5
193
44
38
184
38
23
206
38
23
175
38
1,001
101­
500
0.5
177
40
35
169
35
21
189
35
21
161
35
918
501­
3.3K
0.5
122
28
24
117
24
15
130
24
15
111
24
633
3.3K­
50K
0.5
13
6
58
9
6
57
9
6
57
9
6
235
>
50K
0.5
0
6
6
0
2
6
0
2
6
0
6
31
Monitoring
Waiver
Application
25­
100
1
2,671
0
0
0
0
0
2,670
0
0
0
0
5,341
101­
500
1
2,448
0
0
0
0
0
2,448
0
0
0
0
4,896
501­
3.3K
1
1,690
0
0
0
0
0
1,690
0
0
0
0
3,380
3.3K­
50K
Not
Applicable
>
50K
Eliminate
First­
Draw
and
Customer­
Collected
Certifications
25­
100
­
0.1667
­
4,140
­
1,068
­
718
­
3,071
­
634
­
384
­
3,433
­
634
­
384
­
2,921
­
634
­
18,021
101­
500
­
0.1667
­
3,795
­
979
­
658
­
2,816
­
582
­
352
­
3,147
­
582
­
352
­
2,678
­
582
­
16,522
501­
3.3K
­
0.1667
­
2,620
­
676
­
454
­
1,944
­
402
­
243
­
2,173
­
402
­
243
­
1,849
­
402
­
11,406
3.3K­
50K
­
0.1667
­
237
­
115
­
967
­
141
­
97
­
949
­
141
­
97
­
949
­
141
­
97
­
3,929
>
50K
­
0.1667
­
75
­
104
­
94
0
­
29
­
94
0
­
29
­
94
0
­
29
­
546
Demonstration
of
Representative
Entry
Points
for
Ground
Water
Systems
25­
100
Assumed
not
to
apply
to
small
systems
101­
500
501­
3.3K
June
1999
LCRMR
REPORTING
BURDEN
ALL
SYSTEMS,
Burden
in
hours
System
Size
&
Activities
Burden
per
Event
(
hours)
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
D­
66
3.3K­
50K
1
240
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
240
>
50K
1
157
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
157
Reporting
of
Partial
LSLR
25­
100
0.50
312
415
415
415
415
415
415
415
415
415
415
4,458
101­
500
0.50
454
604
604
604
604
604
604
604
604
604
604
6,494
501­
3.3K
0.50
733
975
975
975
975
975
975
975
975
975
975
10,481
3.3K­
50K
0.50
504
504
504
504
504
504
504
504
504
504
504
5,544
>
50K
0.50
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
792
LCRMR
REPORTING
TOTAL
BURDEN
25­
100
51,188
25,971
26,272
44,306
24,659
22,680
49,892
24,659
22,696
43,824
24,659
360,808
101­
500
47,726
24,503
24,496
41,527
22,972
21,090
46,728
22,972
21,148
40,404
22,972
336,539
501­
3.3K
33,808
17,914
17,612
30,030
16,583
15,219
33,715
16,583
15,343
28,450
16,583
241,840
3.3K­
50K
7,147
6,372
14,155
6,451
6,047
13,981
6,451
6,053
14,078
6,451
6,153
93,339
>
50K
6,159
6,179
5,994
5,042
5,416
5,994
5,040
5,415
6,008
5,047
5,419
61,712
Total
146,027
80,938
88,528
127,355
75,678
78,964
141,826
75,683
79,274
124,175
75,788
1,094,238
June
1999
D­
67
REPORTING
DIFFERENCE
IN
COST:
LCRMR
minus
Baseline
Model
ALL
SYSTEMS,
All
$
Totals
in
Thousands
System
Size
&
Activities
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
Calculation
of
90th
Percentile
Values
and
Reporting
of
Lead
and
Copper
Monitoring
Data
25­
100
Routine
­$
19.7
­$
7.2
­$
1.8
$
0.0
$
0.0
$
0.0
$
0.0
$
0.0
$
0.0
$
0.0
$
0.0
­$
28.6
Reduced
­
153.3
­
50.6
3.8
­
115.2
­
39.8
9.2
­
64.9
­
39.8
9.2
­
120.7
­
39.8
­
601.8
101­
500
Routine
­
27.1
­
9.8
­
2.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
­
39.4
Reduced
­
140.6
­
46.4
3.5
­
105.7
­
36.4
8.4
­
59.5
­
36.4
8.4
­
110.7
­
36.4
­
551.8
501­
3.3K
Routine
­
24.9
­
9.1
­
2.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
­
36.2
Reduced
­
97.0
­
32.0
2.4
­
72.9
­
25.1
5.8
­
41.0
­
25.1
5.8
­
76.4
­
25.1
­
380.8
3.3K­
10K
Routine
­
0.6
­
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
­
1.1
Reduced
­
8.8
­
2.8
­
9.3
­
6.2
­
2.8
­
9.0
­
6.2
­
2.8
­
9.0
­
6.2
­
2.8
­
66.1
10K­
50K
Routine
­
0.6
­
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
­
1.1
Reduced
­
7.3
­
2.4
­
10.1
­
5.2
­
2.4
­
9.9
­
5.2
­
2.4
­
9.9
­
5.2
­
2.4
­
62.5
50K­
100K
Routine
­
5.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
­
5.8
Reduced
0.0
­
1.2
­
2.0
0.0
2.2
­
2.0
0.0
2.2
­
2.0
0.0
2.2
­
0.5
>
100K
Routine
­
5.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
­
5.9
June
1999
REPORTING
DIFFERENCE
IN
COST:
LCRMR
minus
Baseline
Model
ALL
SYSTEMS,
All
$
Totals
in
Thousands
System
Size
&
Activities
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
D­
68
Reduced
0.0
­
1.4
­
2.1
0.0
2.0
­
2.1
0.0
2.0
­
2.1
0.0
2.0
­
1.9
WQP
Monitoring
Results
25­
100
11.8
16.5
18.9
18.9
18.9
18.9
18.9
18.9
18.9
18.9
18.9
198.4
101­
500
10.8
15.2
17.3
17.3
17.3
17.3
17.3
17.3
17.3
17.3
17.3
181.9
501­
3.3K
7.5
10.5
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
125.5
3.3K­
50K
4.3
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
53.3
>
50K
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
68.3
Changes
in
Lead
and
Copper
Tap
Monitoring
Location
25­
100
­
2.3
­
7.1
3.5
­
10.0
­
5.3
3.5
1.8
­
5.3
3.5
­
1.4
­
5.3
­
24.3
101­
500
­
17.3
­
7.3
3.7
­
10.4
­
5.5
3.7
1.8
­
5.5
3.7
­
11.9
­
5.5
­
50.6
501­
3.3K
­
29.8
­
6.1
3.0
­
8.6
­
4.5
3.0
1.5
­
4.5
3.0
­
20.8
­
4.5
­
68.3
3.3K­
50K
­
2.9
­
0.7
2.9
­
2.2
­
0.7
2.9
­
2.2
­
0.7
2.9
­
2.2
­
0.7
­
3.7
>
50K
­
0.9
­
0.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
­
1.9
Eliminate
Sample
Site
Justification
25­
100
­
17.9
­
4.6
­
3.1
­
13.2
­
2.7
­
1.7
­
14.8
­
2.7
­
1.7
­
12.6
­
2.7
­
77.7
101­
500
­
16.4
­
4.2
­
2.8
­
12.1
­
2.5
­
1.5
­
13.6
­
2.5
­
1.5
­
11.6
­
2.5
­
71.3
501­
3.3K
­
11.3
­
2.9
­
2.0
­
8.4
­
1.7
­
1.0
­
9.4
­
1.7
­
1.0
­
8.0
­
1.7
­
49.2
3.3K­
50K
­
1.7
­
0.8
­
7.0
­
1.0
­
0.7
­
6.9
­
1.0
­
0.7
­
6.9
­
1.0
­
0.7
­
28.5
>
50K
­
0.6
­
0.8
­
0.7
0.0
­
0.2
­
0.7
0.0
­
0.2
­
0.7
0.0
­
0.2
­
4.0
Source
Water
Monitoring
Results/
Recommendation
25­
100
0.0
­
21.5
­
7.2
­
21.5
­
7.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
­
57.2
June
1999
REPORTING
DIFFERENCE
IN
COST:
LCRMR
minus
Baseline
Model
ALL
SYSTEMS,
All
$
Totals
in
Thousands
System
Size
&
Activities
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
D­
69
101­
500
0.0
­
19.7
­
6.6
­
19.7
­
6.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
­
52.5
501­
3.3K
0.0
­
13.6
­
4.5
­
13.6
­
4.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
­
36.2
3.3K­
50K
0.0
­
7.4
0.0
­
1.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
­
9.3
>
50K
­
9.4
0.0
­
9.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
­
18.8
Public
Education
Compliance
Letter
25­
100
­
1.5
­
0.8
­
0.8
­
0.8
­
0.8
­
14.3
­
0.8
­
0.8
­
13.5
­
0.8
­
0.8
­
36.1
101­
500
­
2.2
­
1.2
­
1.2
­
1.2
­
1.2
­
13.3
­
1.2
­
1.2
­
12.1
­
1.2
­
1.2
­
37.5
501­
3.3K
­
3.7
­
2.1
­
2.1
­
2.1
­
2.1
­
9.1
­
2.1
­
2.1
­
7.0
­
2.1
­
2.1
­
36.7
3.3K­
50K
­
1.7
­
1.7
­
1.7
­
1.7
­
3.6
­
1.7
­
1.7
­
3.6
0.0
­
1.7
­
1.7
­
20.8
>
50K
­
0.3
­
0.3
­
0.3
­
0.4
1.1
­
0.3
­
0.4
­
0.3
0.0
­
0.3
­
0.3
­
1.4
Annual
Lead
Service
Line
Letter
25­
100
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
101­
500
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
­
0.1
501­
3.3K
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
3.3K­
50K
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
65.7
>
50K
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
6.9
Explanation
of
Changes
in
Treatment
or
Addition
of
A
New
Source
for
Systems
on
Reduced
Monitoring
25­
100
2.9
0.7
0.6
2.8
0.6
0.3
3.1
0.6
0.3
2.6
0.6
15.0
101­
500
2.6
0.6
0.5
2.5
0.5
0.3
2.8
0.5
0.3
2.4
0.5
13.7
501­
3.3K
1.8
0.4
0.4
1.7
0.4
0.2
1.9
0.4
0.2
1.7
0.4
9.5
3.3K­
50K
0.2
0.1
1.0
0.1
0.1
1.0
0.1
0.1
1.0
0.1
0.1
4.1
June
1999
REPORTING
DIFFERENCE
IN
COST:
LCRMR
minus
Baseline
Model
ALL
SYSTEMS,
All
$
Totals
in
Thousands
System
Size
&
Activities
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
D­
70
>
50K
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.5
Monitoring
Waiver
Application
25­
100
39.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
39.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
78.1
101­
500
35.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
35.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
71.6
501­
3.3K
24.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
24.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
49.4
3.3K­
50K
Not
Applicable
>
50K
Eliminate
First­
Draw
and
Customer­
Collected
Certifications
25­
100
­
59.2
­
15.3
­
10.3
­
43.9
­
9.1
­
5.5
­
49.1
­
9.1
­
5.5
­
41.7
­
9.1
­
257.5
101­
500
­
54.2
­
14.0
­
9.4
­
40.2
­
8.3
­
5.0
­
45.0
­
8.3
­
5.0
­
38.3
­
8.3
­
236.1
501­
3.3K
­
37.4
­
9.7
­
6.5
­
27.8
­
5.7
­
3.5
­
31.0
­
5.7
­
3.5
­
26.4
­
5.7
­
163.0
3.3K­
50K
­
4.0
­
1.9
­
16.1
­
2.3
­
1.6
­
15.8
­
2.3
­
1.6
­
15.8
­
2.3
­
1.6
­
65.6
>
50K
­
1.3
­
1.7
­
1.6
0.0
­
0.5
­
1.6
0.0
­
0.5
­
1.6
0.0
­
0.5
­
9.1
Demonstration
of
Representative
Entry
Points
for
Ground
Water
Systems
25­
100
Assumed
not
to
apply
to
small
systems
101­
500
501­
3.3K
3.3K­
50K
4.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.1
>
50K
2.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.7
Reporting
of
Partial
LSLR
25­
100
4.7
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
66.6
June
1999
REPORTING
DIFFERENCE
IN
COST:
LCRMR
minus
Baseline
Model
ALL
SYSTEMS,
All
$
Totals
in
Thousands
System
Size
&
Activities
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
D­
71
101­
500
6.8
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
97.1
501­
3.3K
11.0
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
156.7
3.3K­
50K
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
96.2
>
50K
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
13.7
LCR
REPORTING
TOTAL
COST:
LCRMR
MINUS
BASELINE
25­
100
­
195.4
­
83.7
9.9
­
176.9
­
39.2
16.7
­
60.6
­
32.0
17.5
­
149.6
­
32.0
­
725.3
101­
500
­
201.7
­
77.9
11.5
­
160.5
­
33.7
18.9
­
52.5
­
27.1
20.1
­
144.9
­
27.1
­
674.9
501­
3.3K
­
159.2
­
50.0
15.0
­
105.1
­
16.9
22.0
­
28.9
­
12.4
24.1
­
105.5
­
12.4
­
429.3
3.3K­
50K
­
4.2
0.8
­
20.7
­
0.8
7.8
­
19.7
1.1
7.8
­
18.1
1.1
9.7
­
35.3
>
50K
­
13.3
1.9
­
7.8
7.7
12.7
1.6
7.7
11.3
1.9
7.8
11.4
42.9
Total
­
573.9
­
208.9
8.0
­
435.5
­
69.4
39.4
­
133.1
­
52.5
45.6
­
391.1
­
50.4
­
1,821.8
June
1999
D­
72
REPORTING
DIFFERENCE
IN
BURDEN:
LCRMR
minus
Baseline
Model
ALL
SYSTEMS,
Burden
in
hours
System
Size
&
Activities
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
Calculation
of
90th
Percentile
Values
and
Reporting
of
Lead
and
Copper
Monitoring
Data
25­
100
Routine
­
1,377
­
501
­
125
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
­
2,003
Reduced
­
10,640
­
3,506
250
­
8,012
­
2,755
626
­
4,548
­
2,755
626
­
8,387
­
2,755
­
41,854
101­
500
Routine
­
1,893
­
689
­
172
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
­
2,754
Reduced
­
9,757
­
3,214
229
­
7,345
­
2,525
573
­
4,171
­
2,525
573
­
7,691
­
2,525
­
38,377
501­
3.3K
Routine
­
1,744
­
634
­
159
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
­
2,536
Reduced
­
6,733
­
2,218
159
­
5,070
­
1,742
396
­
2,878
­
1,742
396
­
5,308
­
1,742
­
26,484
3.3K­
10K
Routine
­
34
­
32
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
­
66
Reduced
­
525
­
169
­
559
­
371
­
169
­
542
­
371
­
169
­
542
­
371
­
169
­
3,957
10K­
50K
Routine
­
33
­
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
­
66
Reduced
­
436
­
145
­
610
­
308
­
145
­
595
­
308
­
145
­
595
­
308
­
145
­
3,739
50K­
100K
Routine
­
344
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
­
344
Reduced
0
­
73
­
117
0
129
­
117
0
129
­
117
0
129
­
36
>
100K
Routine
­
352
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
­
352
Reduced
0
­
87
­
126
0
116
­
126
0
116
­
126
0
116
­
119
June
1999
REPORTING
DIFFERENCE
IN
BURDEN:
LCRMR
minus
Baseline
Model
ALL
SYSTEMS,
Burden
in
hours
System
Size
&
Activities
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
D­
73
WQP
Monitoring
Results
25­
100
826
1,157
1,322
1,322
1,322
1,322
1,322
1,322
1,322
1,322
1,322
13,881
101­
500
758
1,060
1,212
1,212
1,212
1,212
1,212
1,212
1,212
1,212
1,212
12,726
501­
3.3K
523
732
837
837
837
837
837
837
837
837
837
8,785
3.3K­
50K
257
294
294
294
294
294
294
294
294
294
294
3,194
>
50K
372
372
372
372
372
372
372
372
372
372
372
4,095
Changes
in
Lead
and
Copper
Tap
Monitoring
Location
25­
100
­
161
­
495
248
­
701
­
371
247
123
­
371
247
­
96
­
371
­
1,701
101­
500
­
1,211
­
512
256
­
727
­
385
256
129
­
385
256
­
833
­
385
­
3,541
501­
3.3K
­
2,088
­
424
212
­
601
­
318
213
106
­
318
213
­
1,457
­
318
­
4,780
3.3K­
50K
­
175
­
43
175
­
132
­
43
174
­
132
­
43
174
­
132
­
43
­
220
>
50K
­
56
­
56
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
­
112
Eliminate
First­
Draw
and
Customer­
Collected
Certifications
25­
100
­
1,451
­
374
­
252
­
1,076
­
222
­
135
­
1,203
­
222
­
135
­
1,024
­
222
­
6,315
101­
500
­
1,330
­
343
­
231
­
987
­
204
­
123
­
1,103
­
204
­
123
­
938
­
204
­
5,790
501­
3.3K
­
918
­
237
­
159
­
681
­
141
­
85
­
761
­
141
­
85
­
648
­
141
­
3,997
3.3K­
50K
­
117
­
57
­
477
­
69
­
48
­
468
­
69
­
48
­
468
­
69
­
48
­
1,937
>
50K
­
38
­
52
­
47
0
­
14
­
47
0
­
14
­
47
0
­
14
­
274
Source
Water
Monitoring
Results/
Recommendation
25­
100
0
­
1,502
­
501
­
1,502
­
501
0
0
0
0
0
0
­
4,006
101­
500
0
­
1,377
­
459
­
1,377
­
459
0
0
0
0
0
0
­
3,673
501­
3.3K
0
­
951
­
317
­
951
­
317
0
0
0
0
0
0
­
2,535
June
1999
REPORTING
DIFFERENCE
IN
BURDEN:
LCRMR
minus
Baseline
Model
ALL
SYSTEMS,
Burden
in
hours
System
Size
&
Activities
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
D­
74
3.3K­
50K
0
­
445
0
­
111
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
­
556
>
50K
­
564
0
­
564
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
­
1,128
Public
Education
Compliance
Letter
25­
100
­
99
­
57
­
57
­
57
­
57
­
959
­
57
­
57
­
902
­
57
­
57
­
2,412
101­
500
­
146
­
83
­
83
­
83
­
83
­
891
­
83
­
83
­
808
­
83
­
83
­
2,508
501­
3.3K
­
247
­
141
­
141
­
141
­
141
­
612
­
141
­
141
­
471
­
141
­
141
­
2,458
3.3K­
50K
­
98
­
98
­
98
­
98
­
210
­
98
­
98
­
210
0
­
98
­
98
­
1,200
>
50K
­
15
­
15
­
15
­
21
63
­
15
­
21
­
15
0
­
15
­
15
­
81
Annual
Lead
Service
Line
Letter
25­
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
­
2
101­
500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
­
4
501­
3.3K
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
3.3K­
50K
351
351
351
351
351
351
351
351
351
351
351
3,861
>
50K
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
407
Explanation
of
Changes
in
Treatment
or
Addition
of
A
New
Source
for
Systems
on
Reduced
Monitoring
25­
100
193
44
38
184
38
23
206
38
23
175
38
1,001
101­
500
177
40
35
169
35
21
189
35
21
161
35
918
501­
3.3K
122
28
24
117
24
15
130
24
15
111
24
633
3.3K­
50K
13
6
58
9
6
57
9
6
57
9
6
235
>
50K
0
6
6
0
2
6
0
2
6
0
6
31
Monitoring
Waiver
Application
25­
100
2,671
0
0
0
0
0
2,670
0
0
0
0
5,341
June
1999
REPORTING
DIFFERENCE
IN
BURDEN:
LCRMR
minus
Baseline
Model
ALL
SYSTEMS,
Burden
in
hours
System
Size
&
Activities
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
D­
75
101­
500
2,448
0
0
0
0
0
2,448
0
0
0
0
4,896
501­
3.3K
1,690
0
0
0
0
0
1,690
0
0
0
0
3,380
3.3K­
50K
Not
Applicable
>
50K
No
Longer
Required
to
Complete
Certification
25­
100
­
4,140
­
1,068
­
718
­
3,071
­
634
­
384
­
3,433
­
634
­
384
­
2,921
­
634
­
18,021
101­
500
­
3,795
­
979
­
658
­
2,816
­
582
­
352
­
3,147
­
582
­
352
­
2,678
­
582
­
16,522
501­
3.3K
­
2,620
­
676
­
454
­
1,944
­
402
­
243
­
2,173
­
402
­
243
­
1,849
­
402
­
11,406
3.3K­
50K
­
237
­
115
­
967
­
141
­
97
­
949
­
141
­
97
­
949
­
141
­
97
­
3,929
>
50K
­
75
­
104
­
94
0
­
29
­
94
0
­
29
­
94
0
­
29
­
546
Demonstration
of
Representative
Entry
Points
for
Ground
Water
Systems
25­
100
Assumed
not
to
apply
to
small
systems
101­
500
501­
3.3K
3.3K­
50K
240
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
240
>
50K
157
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
157
Reporting
of
Partial
LSLR
25­
100
312
415
415
415
415
415
415
415
415
415
415
4,458
101­
500
454
604
604
604
604
604
604
604
604
604
604
6,494
501­
3.3K
733
975
975
975
975
975
975
975
975
975
975
10,481
3.3K­
50K
504
504
504
504
504
504
504
504
504
504
504
5,544
>
50K
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
792
June
1999
REPORTING
DIFFERENCE
IN
BURDEN:
LCRMR
minus
Baseline
Model
ALL
SYSTEMS,
Burden
in
hours
System
Size
&
Activities
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
D­
76
TOTAL
BURDEN
REPORTING
DIFFERENCE:
LCRMR
MINUS
BASELINE
25­
100
­
13,865
­
5,888
621
­
12,498
­
2,765
1,155
­
4,504
­
2,264
1,212
­
10,572
­
2,264
­
51,632
101­
500
­
14,295
­
5,492
732
­
11,350
­
2,387
1,300
­
3,922
­
1,928
1,383
­
10,247
­
1,928
­
48,133
501­
3.3K
­
11,282
­
3,546
977
­
7,459
­
1,224
1,496
­
2,215
­
907
1,637
­
7,480
­
907
­
30,910
3.3K­
50K
­
289
18
­
1,329
­
72
443
­
1,271
39
443
­
1,173
39
556
­
2,596
>
50K
­
805
101
­
476
460
748
88
460
670
103
467
674
2,490
Total
­
40,537
­
14,806
526
­
30,919
­
5,185
2,769
­
10,142
­
3,986
3,161
­
27,793
­
3,869
­
130,781