Document ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2003-0012-0021
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2007-01-17T05:00Z

Dicrotophos Meeting Minutes: EPA/National Cotton Council

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

3:30pm – 4:30pm, Rm. 9100

Attendees:

Angus Kelly (NCC), Ray Young (NAICC) Harold Coble (USDA-OPMP) Jon Wood,
Ian Chart, Paul Vaculin (Amvac), Bill Chism, Laura Parsons, Arnet Jones,
Derek Berwald, Linda Murray, Rick Keigwin, Susan Lewis, Amaris Johnson
(EPA), Scott Stewart (Univ. of TN), Ralph Bagwell (LSU) Gus Lorenz
(Univ. of AL), Angus Catchot (MSU) Tucker Miller (Consultant MACA),
Roger Leonard (LSU)

via conference call:

Phillip Roberts (Univ. of GA)

Ron Smith, Barry Freeman (Auburn Univ.)

Summary of Meeting:

This meeting was held at the request of Angus Kelly of the National
Cotton Council (NCC) to discuss the need for early season use of
dicrotophos.  This meeting is subsequent to a prior meeting of October
2005, in which Amvac and the NCC requested an additional application of
dicrotophos for critical late season use for plant and stink bugs.  The
EPA granted the additional late season application, yet restricted the
early season use since the cotton entomologists agreed at that time that
the late season application was more important.  During this meeting
with NCC and stakeholders, Dr. Catchot stated that alternatives for
thrip control caused flare ups in spider mite and aphid populations,
thus the need for use of dicrotophos early season.  The cotton
entomologists in attendance stated that since 2004 they have seen
increased resistance to alternative neonecitinoids used to treat cotton
aphids, and increased number of pesticide applications for spider mites
which were previously not a concern with dicrotophos applications. 

EPA has yet to receive a label reflecting the required mitigation
measures from October 2005.  As a result, the Agency told Amvac and the
other attendees that Amvac must submit a label with the required
mitigation.  The Agency will also consider any data submission that the
cotton entomologists submit, and the draft label can be revised if the
data warrant additional use.