Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0051-1855
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2006-12-20T05:00Z

Steven Silverman/DC/USEPA/US
12/07/2006 02:24 PM	To
Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA
cc
aflynn@omb.eop.gov, Steve Fruh/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Teresa 
Clemons/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA
bcc

Subject
Re: Revised HCl and THC sections
	
		
		Keith/Amy,
		
		
		A few edits attached (to Keith's redline version) which edits will show up 
in bold.  Most correct typos or fix fact errors (like cross-references).  
However, I made some substantive edits to the discussion of the 20 
ppmv/98% reduction new source THC std.  The edits are to better tie that 
limit to performance of the source with an RTO (which is the legal test), 
rather than to the performance of RTOs generally.
		
		
		
		
		Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US 
12/07/2006 12:58 PM	
To
aflynn@omb.eop.gov
cc
Steve Fruh/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Steven Silverman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Teresa 
Clemons/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA
Subject
Revised HCl and THC sections
	

	

Dear Amy:

I am sending the sections on the rationale for THC and HCl and the THC and 
HCl comments.  We have responded to your comments.

Note that there are one or two comment responses where the comment itself 
is moot, but because the issue may apply elsewhere we left the response in.

I have also included a redline version that compares what you previously 
saw for these section with the current version.

Keith W. Barnett
USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG
Mail Code D243-02
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711
919-541-5605
barnett.keith@epa.gov