Document ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2003-0012-0309
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2004-01-06T05:00Z

SRCNAME
SAMPLENO
DATESMPL
ANALYTE
FILTERED
RsltPost
UNITS
LPSD
WELL
F
WWK­
G­
LPWD_
WELL_
F
2/
28/
2001
APFO
T
0.100
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
A
WWK­
G­
LPWD_
WELL_
A
2/
28/
2001
APFO
T
0.45
ug/
l
LUBECK
OFFICE
WWK­
LUBECK_
OFFICE
2/
28/
2001
APFO
T
0.32
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
B
WWK­
G­
LPWD_
WELL_
B
2/
28/
2001
APFO
T
0.370
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
F
WWK­
G­
LPWD_
WELL_
F
6/
15/
2001
APFO
T
ND
(
0.090)
Uug/
l
LPSD
WELL
B
WWK­
G­
LPWD_
WELL_
B
6/
15/
2001
APFO
T
0.321
ug/
l
LUBECK
OFFICE
WWK­
D­
LUBECK_
OFFICE
6/
15/
2001
APFO
T
ND
(
0.090)
Uug/
l
LPSD
WELL
A
WWK­
G­
LPWD_
WELL_
A
6/
15/
2001
APFO
T
0.431
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
B
WWK­
G­
LPWD_
WELL_
B
8/
14/
2001
APFO
T
0.171
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
A
WWK­
G­
LPWD_
WELL_
A
8/
14/
2001
APFO
T
0.21
ug/
l
LUBECK
OFFICE
WWK­
D­
LUBECK_
OFFICE
8/
14/
2001
APFO
T
0.206
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
F
WWK­
G­
LPWD_
WELL_
F
8/
14/
2001
APFO
T
ND
(
0.090)
Uug/
l
APFO
indicates
that
this
is
trial
data,
check
in
CED
for
FC­
143,
not
APFO!
SRCNAME
DATESMPL
RsltPost
(
FC­
143)
UNITS
LPSD
WELL
A
1/
19/
2000
0.80
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
F
1/
19/
2000
0.313
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
B
1/
19/
2000
0.440
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
F
4/
19/
2000
0.21
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
B
4/
19/
2000
0.516
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
A
5/
24/
2000
0.315
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
B
8/
15/
2000
0.159
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
F
8/
15/
2000
0.073
J
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
A
8/
15/
2000
0.535
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
F
10/
31/
2000
0.196
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
A
10/
31/
2000
0.672
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
F
10/
31/
2000
0.40
ug/
l
LUBECK
OFFICE
10/
31/
2000
0.629
ug/
l
LUBECK
OFFICE
10/
31/
2000
0.67
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
B
10/
31/
2000
0.492
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
B
10/
31/
2000
0.81
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
A
10/
31/
2000
0.79
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
F
2/
28/
2001
0.212
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
B
2/
28/
2001
0.638
ug/
l
LUBECK
OFFICE
2/
28/
2001
0.499
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
A
2/
28/
2001
0.648
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
B
6/
15/
2001
0.555
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
F
6/
15/
2001
0.065
J
ug/
l
LUBECK
OFFICE
6/
15/
2001
0.143
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
A
6/
15/
2001
0.220
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
F
8/
14/
2001
0.055
J
ug/
l
LUBECK
OFFICE
8/
14/
2001
0.224
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
B
8/
14/
2001
0.236
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
A
8/
14/
2001
0.270
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
F
10/
11/
2001
0.288
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
A
10/
11/
2001
0.703
ug/
l
LPSD
WELL
B
10/
11/
2001
0.581
ug/
l
LUBECK
OFFICE
10/
11/
2001
0.621
ug/
l
Table
3.9
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Groundwater
DuPont
Washington
Works
Facility
Washington,
WV
01/
06/
04
1
of
6
Table
3­
9
Active
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
8/
26/
03
3.85
5/
21/
03
2.96
2/
25/
03
1.37
10/
16/
02
1.74
9/
04/
02
1.92
5/
23/
02
1.25
4/
29/
02
1.22
3/
26/
02
2.82
2/
22/
02
1.45
1/
28/
02
1.2
2/
2/
99
0.69
L
AE11­
MW01
11/
10/
98
0.41
8/
25/
03
0.0821
5/
22/
03
0.377
2/
25/
03
0.099
AJ06­
MW02
10/
16/
02
0.133
8/
11/
03
1.16
5/
22/
03
0.377
3/
8/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
10/
22/
02
0.269
8/
26/
02
0.335
5/
17/
02
0.247
4/
16/
02
0.159
3/
21/
02
0.171
2/
14/
02
0.129
1/
22/
02
0.131
11/
20/
00
0.24
8/
16/
00
0.071
J
5/
12/
99
0.578
2/
3/
99
0.082
B
11/
18/
98
1.9
L
6/
19/
98
0.4
6/
2/
97
0.79
AM07­
PW01
4/
2/
96
0.48
8/
11/
03
0.802
5/
22/
03
0.736
3/
8/
03
0.308
10/
22/
02
0.415
8/
26/
02
0.420
5/
17/
02
0.499
4/
16/
02
0.497
3/
21/
02
0.568
2/
14/
02
0.439
1/
22/
02
0.355
11/
20/
00
0.4
11/
20/
00
(
dup)
0.26
8/
15/
00
0.167
5/
12/
99
0.307
6/
19/
98
1
6/
2/
97
0.55
AO08­
PW01
4/
2/
96
0.52
8/
11/
03
1.51
5/
22/
03
1.97
3/
3/
03
1.07
10/
22/
02
0.721
8/
26/
02
0.834
5/
17/
02
0.911
4/
16/
02
1.42
3/
21/
02
1.22
AX13­
PW01
2/
14/
02
1.03
Table
3.9
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Groundwater
DuPont
Washington
Works
Facility
Washington,
WV
01/
06/
04
2
of
6
Table
3­
9
Active
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
8/
26/
03
0.0764
5/
21/
03
0.846
5/
21/
03
(
dup)
0.841
2/
25/
03
3.72
10/
16/
02
0.126
9/
04/
02
0.117
5/
23/
02
0.551
4/
29/
02
0.424
3/
26/
02
0.262
2/
22/
02
1.27
D08­
MW01
1/
28/
02
0.582
8/
26/
03
2.88
5/
21/
03
3.67
2/
25/
03
3.15
10/
16/
02
3.43
9/
04/
02
2.39
5/
23/
02
2.47
4/
29/
02
2.44
3/
28/
02
1.62
2/
22/
02
2.32
1/
28/
02
2.11
5/
12/
99
0.882
2/
2/
99
0.59
L
E13­
MW01
11/
11/
98
2
8/
11/
03
11.9
5/
22/
03
16.0
3/
8/
03
8.93
10/
22/
02
16.2
8/
26/
02
9.71
5/
17/
02
12.4
4/
16/
02
13.2
3/
21/
02
17.2
2/
14/
02
12.00
1/
22/
02
10.5
11/
20/
00
7.5
2/
9/
99
16.2
K16­
PW01
11/
18/
98
0.46
L
8/
11/
03
10.1
5/
22/
03
24.8
3/
10/
03
19.8
10/
25/
02
14.3
8/
13/
02
3.06
5/
21/
02
15.1
4/
18/
02
16.1
3/
21/
02
40.9
2/
7/
02
23.5
1/
15/
02
30.9
7/
11/
01
0.202
4/
11/
01
3.99
11/
20/
00
13.8
2/
7/
99
5.89
11/
18/
98
7.9
J
L04­
PW01
11/
18/
98
(
dup)
3.9
J
8/
25/
03
208
5/
21/
03
268
2/
26/
03
244
N04­
MW03
10/
16/
02
21.2
Table
3.9
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Groundwater
DuPont
Washington
Works
Facility
Washington,
WV
01/
06/
04
3
of
6
Table
3­
9
Active
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
8/
26/
03
Dry­
no
sample
5/
22/
03
Dry­
no
sample
2/
25/
03
Dry­
no
sample
10/
16/
02
Dry­
no
sample
9/
04/
02
Dry­
no
sample
5/
23/
02
Dry­
no
sample
4/
29/
02
Dry­
no
sample
3/
28/
02
Dry­
no
sample
2/
25/
02
57.8
2/
2/
99
29.6L
N13­
MW01
11/
11/
98
<
0.1
8/
26/
03
35100
5/
21/
03
45600
2/
26/
03
36900
10/
16/
02
46600
10/
16/
02
(
dup)
48300
9/
04/
02
34400
5/
23/
02
42400
4/
29/
02
36500
3/
26/
02
32300
2/
25/
02
26800
1/
28/
02
23600
1/
25/
01
12600
2/
6/
99
13600
P04­
MW02
11/
12/
98
8300
8/
26/
03
Dry­
no
sample
5/
22/
03
Dry­
no
sample
2/
25/
03
Dry­
no
sample
10/
16/
02
120
9/
04/
02
Dry­
no
sample
5/
23/
02
Dry­
no
sample
4/
29/
02
Dry­
no
sample
3/
28/
02
Pump
problems
­
no
sample
2/
25/
02
20.7
2/
4/
99
43.4
P08­
MW01
11/
13/
98
36
8/
26/
03
761
5/
21/
03
831
2/
26/
03
566
10/
16/
02
7720
9/
04/
02
32.2
5/
23/
02
1480
4/
29/
02
1210
3/
26/
02
2070
2/
25/
02
1590
1/
28/
02
1480
2/
4/
99
994
Q04­
MW02
11/
13/
98
660
Table
3.9
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Groundwater
DuPont
Washington
Works
Facility
Washington,
WV
01/
06/
04
4
of
6
Table
3­
9
Active
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
8/
26/
03
66700
8/
26/
03
(
dup)
70000
5/
21/
03
67500
2/
26/
03
322000
2/
26/
03
(
dup)
289000
10/
16/
02
84100
9/
04/
02
66500
5/
23/
02
68100
4/
29/
02
56300
3/
26/
02
54400
2/
25/
02
43600
1/
28/
02
47500
1/
25/
01
13800
2/
6/
99
9420
R04­
MW02
11/
12/
98
1300
8/
11/
03
36.3
5/
22/
03
51.1
3/
10/
03
42.5
10/
25/
02
51.2
8/
13/
02
34.8
5/
21/
02
35.8
4/
18/
02
37.6
3/
21/
02
40.9
2/
7/
02
25.10
1/
15/
02
29.0
7/
11/
01
11.4
4/
11/
01
5.48
11/
20/
00
13.7
2/
7/
99
12.4
2/
7/
99
(
dup)
3.95
V05­
PW01
11/
18/
98
0.66
L
8/
26/
03
16.7
5/
22/
03
21.6
2/
25/
03
15.7
10/
16/
02
18.2
9/
04/
02
18.4
5/
23/
02
15.3
4/
29/
02
13.9
3/
28/
02
15.5
2/
22/
02
10.9
1/
28/
02
12.7
2/
2/
99
4.95
L
Y14­
MW01
11/
10/
98
12
8//
25/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
5/
22/
03
0.0506
2/
25/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
Y14­
MW02
10/
16/
02
NQ
(<
0.05)
Table
3.9
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Groundwater
DuPont
Washington
Works
Facility
Washington,
WV
01/
06/
04
5
of
6
Table
3­
9
Active
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
8/
11/
03
7.14
5/
23/
03
8.37
3/
10/
03
7.12
10/
25/
02
10.3
8/
13/
02
6.41
5/
21/
02
7.09
4/
16/
02
6.69
3/
21/
02
7.72
2/
7/
02
5.77
1/
15/
02
6.52
7/
11/
01
2.31
West
Well
Field
(
1)

4/
11/
01
1.58
Historic
Sampling
Locations
2/
6/
99
5.43
11/
12/
98
<
0.1
AA04­
MW01
11/
12/
98
(
dup)
0.42
2/
4/
99
1.46
AA05­
MW01
11/
11/
98
0.77
2/
4/
99
0.535
AB07­
MW02
11/
16/
98
<
0.2
I
2/
4/
99
0.356
AC07­
MW02
11/
16/
98
0.79
ADPMW
1
12/
6/
91
7800
ADPMW
2
12/
6/
91
25
ADPMW
3
12/
6/
91
20000
10/
11/
01
0.498
AQ09­
PW01
5/
12/
99
1.45
BGMW2
12/
13/
91
2.3
12/
13/
91
4
BGMW3
12/
13/
91
(
dup)
3.6
BGMW5
12/
11/
91
5.5
10/
11/
01
0.507
10/
11/
01
(
dup)
0.471
BLDG
1
MAIN
8/
15/
00
0.589
10/
11/
01
0.45
5/
12/
99
0.306
BLDG
231
5/
12/
99
(
dup)
0.269
10/
11/
01
0.423
BLDG
293
5/
12/
99
0.496
BLDG
5
5/
12/
99
0.213
2/
2/
99
0.35
L
F06­
MW01
11/
11/
98
<
0.1
5/
12/
99
2.47
2/
2/
99
2.11
L
G17­
MW01
11/
11/
98
13
2/
5/
99
4.91
L06­
MW01
11/
13/
98
870
9/
14/
00
0.819
6/
3/
99
1.63
2/
9/
99
2.76
11/
18/
98
0.33
6/
2/
98
16
5/
29/
97
7.9
4/
11/
96
3.7
L17­
PW01
2/
16/
94
2
Table
3.9
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Groundwater
DuPont
Washington
Works
Facility
Washington,
WV
01/
06/
04
6
of
6
Table
3­
9
Historic
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
2/
7/
99
17
M04­
MW02
11/
12/
98
0.2
2/
3/
99
3.66
L
M16­
MW01
11/
10/
98
0.86
MW­
AJP
4/
18/
96
<
0.4
MW­
MGM
4/
18/
96
0.69
MW­
TWW
4/
18/
96
0.85
MWBG
4/
2/
96
<
0.1
1/
25/
01
698
1/
25/
01
(
dup)
696
2/
7/
99
329
N04­
MW02
11/
12/
98
380
2/
5/
99
815
N05­
MW01
11/
13/
98
13
2/
5/
99
434
P05­
MW02
11/
13/
98
1200
2/
5/
99
414
P06­
MW02
11/
13/
98
31
Q05­
MW01
11/
13/
98
38
12/
5/
91
140
RBLMW1
12/
5/
91
(
dup)
140
12/
11/
91
65
RBLMW2
12/
11/
91
(
dup)
67
RBLMW3
12/
11/
91
7100
RBLMW4
12/
5/
91
550
RBLMW5
12/
10/
91
1300
RBLMW6
11/
21/
91
3300
11/
21/
91
46
RBLMW7
11/
21/
91
(
dup)
52
RBLMW8
12/
10/
91
2.4
RBLMW9
12/
10/
91
3.4
RBLMW10
11/
20/
91
14
RBLMW11
11/
20/
91
47
RBLMW12
12/
10/
91
4.6
2/
5/
99
174
S05­
MW02
11/
13/
98
690
2/
3/
99
0.64
L
2/
3/
99
(
dup)
1.30
L
T13­
MW01
11/
17/
98
<
0.1
R
2/
6/
99
4.2
U04­
MW01
11/
12/
98
1.6
5/
11/
00
4.7
5/
20/
99
2
U16­
MW01
6/
19/
98
11
2/
4/
99
1.91
V06­
MW01
11/
16/
98
1.7
2/
6/
99
0.729
W05­
MW01
11/
17/
98
0.31
2/
4/
99
0.803
Z06­
MW02
11/
16/
98
4.5
2/
4/
99
2.05
Z07­
MW01
11/
16/
98
3.8
2/
6/
99
2.74
Z09­
MW01
11/
17/
98
<
0.1
R
J
=
estimated
value
(
below
laboratory
quantification
limit)
L
=
possible
low
bias
result
(
relative
to
QA/
QC)
B=
compound
detected
in
QC
blank
Note:
Analytical
method
changed
as
of
November
2001
(
see
Section
2.0
for
details).
Table
3.10
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Surface
Water
DuPont
Washington
Works
Facility
Washington,
WV
01/
06/
04
1
of
4
Table
3­
10
Active
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
9/
17/
03
23.8
8/
15/
03
32.2
7/
28/
03
11.7
6/
13/
03
7.95
5/
22/
03
14.9
4/
30/
03
14.9
3/
31/
03
51.4
2/
27/
03
18.9
1/
26/
03
3.58
12/
9/
02
9.76
11/
13/
02
17.0
10/
18/
02
10.5
9/
24/
02
2.15
8/
27/
02
2.94
7/
23/
02
8.63
6/
25/
02
17.9
5/
20/
02
22.4
4/
16/
02
19.7
3/
19/
02
21.4
2/
5/
02
9.43
1/
17/
02
10.9
OUTLET
001
12/
20/
01
3.720
9/
17/
03
5.38
9/
17/
03
(
dup)
5.65
8/
15/
03
3.90
7/
28/
03
5.37
7/
28/
03
(
dup)
5.48
6/
13/
03
5.11
5/
22/
03
4.09
4/
30/
03
4.09
3/
31/
03
4.11
2/
27/
03
4.15
1/
26/
03
5.46
12/
9/
02
2.37
11/
13/
02
4.75
11/
13/
02
(
dup)
5.28
10/
18/
02
3.49
9/
24/
02
2.14
8/
27/
02
2.56
8/
27/
02
(
dup)
2.51
7/
23/
02
2.29
6/
25/
02
3.86
6/
25/
02
(
dup)
3.81
5/
20/
02
4.13
4/
16/
02
2.45
3/
19/
02
5.85
2/
5/
02
4.66
1/
17/
02
4.23
12/
20/
01
1.980
11/
26/
01*
4.84
10/
25/
01
2.8
9/
19/
01
0.118
7/
11/
01
0.558
6/
14/
01
0.594
5/
31/
01
0.436
4/
11/
01
1.5
3/
21/
01
8.54
OUTFALL
002
2/
14/
01
1.74
Table
3.10
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Surface
Water
DuPont
Washington
Works
Facility
Washington,
WV
01/
06/
04
2
of
4
Table
3­
10
Active
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
8/
15/
03
0.352
7/
28/
03
1.1
6/
13/
03
0.529
5/
22/
03
0.49
5/
22/
03
(
dup)
0.496
4/
30/
03
1.23
3/
31/
03
0.430
2/
27/
03
1.06
1/
26/
03
0.750
1/
26/
03
(
dup)
0.842
12/
9/
02
0.680
11/
13/
02
1.24
10/
18/
02
0.870
9/
24/
02
0.317
8/
27/
02
0.268
7/
23/
02
0.291
6/
25/
02
0.175
5/
20/
02
0.503
4/
16/
02
2.76
3/
19/
02
2.91
3/
19/
02
(
dup)
2.81
2/
5/
02
1.33
1/
17/
02
0.956
1/
17/
02
(
dup)
3.99
OUTLET
003
12/
20/
01
0.713
9/
17/
03
21.0
8/
15/
03
13.7
8/
15/
03
(
dup)
13.5
7/
28/
03
59.1
6/
13/
03
247
6/
13/
03
(
dup)
237
5/
22/
03
15.9
4/
30/
03
15.9
4/
30/
03
(
dup)
16.7
3/
31/
03
42.1
3/
31/
03
(
dup)
43.1
2/
27/
03
46.4
2/
27/
03
(
dup)
46.2
1/
26/
03
33.4
12/
9/
02
6.39
12/
9/
02
(
dup)
6.62
11/
13/
02
18.1
10/
18/
02
12.1
9/
24/
02
4.64
9/
24/
02
(
dup)
5.02
8/
27/
02
12.4
7/
23/
02
19.2
6/
25/
02
17.9
5/
20/
02
98.6
5/
17/
02
65.7
4/
16/
02
3.8
3/
19/
02
9.26
OUTFALL
005
2/
5/
02
141.0
Table
3.10
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Surface
Water
DuPont
Washington
Works
Facility
Washington,
WV
01/
06/
04
3
of
4
Table
3­
10
Active
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
1/
17/
02
137.0
12/
20/
01
31.40
12/
20/
01(
dup)
35.20
11/
26/
01
915
10/
25/
01
65.7
9/
19/
01
2.86
8/
30/
01
2.16
7/
11/
01
120
6/
14/
01
7.4
5/
31/
01
1.43
4/
11/
01
4.31
3/
21/
01
199
OUTFALL
005
(
continued)

2/
14/
01
153
8/
15/
03
0.496
7/
28/
03
0.973
6/
13/
03
1.55
5/
22/
03
0.206
4/
30/
03
0.486
3/
31/
03
0.897
2/
27/
03
1.1
1/
26/
03
5.77
12/
9/
02
0.263
11/
13/
02
8.56
10/
18/
02
0.251
10/
18/
02
(
dup)
0.209
9/
24/
02
NQ
(<
0.05)
8/
27/
02
0.207
7/
23/
02
0.597
7/
23/
02
(
dup)
0.544
6/
25/
02
0.284
5/
20/
02
0.490
4/
16/
02
0.567
3/
19/
02
0.483
2/
5/
02
0.320
2/
5/
02(
dup)
0.339
1/
17/
02
0.871
OUTLET
007
12/
20/
01
1.99
9/
17/
03
14.4
8/
15/
03
3.82
7/
28/
03
15.7
6/
13/
03
29.3
5/
22/
03
44.6
4/
30/
03
44.9
3/
31/
03
9.25
2/
27/
03
17.0
1/
26/
03
16.9
12/
9/
02
6.07
11/
13/
02
10.5
10/
18/
02
54.6
9/
24/
02
3.69
8/
27/
02
6.73
7/
23/
02
34.7
6/
25/
02
3.86
5/
20/
02
6.27
5/
20/
02
(
dup)
5.16
OUTLET
105
4/
16/
02
15.9
Table
3.10
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Surface
Water
DuPont
Washington
Works
Facility
Washington,
WV
01/
06/
04
4
of
4
Table
3­
10
Active
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
3/
19/
02
13.2
2/
5/
02
14.6
1/
17/
02
7.53
OUTLET
105
(
continued)

12/
20/
01
9.78
Historic
Sampling
Locations
RIVER
BELOW
005
6/
14/
01
0.034
J
RIVER
BELOW
PAGES
RUN
6/
14/
01
0.075
J
Note:
Analytical
method
changed
as
of
November
2001
(
see
Section
2.0
for
details).
NQ
=
Not
Quantifiable.
Detected
at
a
concentration
above
the
LOD
and
below
the
limit
of
quantification
(
LOQ).
Table
3.13
Summary
of
C­
8
in
Groundwater
Public
Water
Supplies,
West
Virginia
and
Ohio
Dupont
Washington
Works
Facility,
Washington
WV
Location
Sample
ID
Sample
Date
C­
8
ug/
l
Comments
Little
Hocking,
OH
LHPSD1
12/
20/
2001
1.82
Production
Well
LHPSD1
1/
21/
2002
1.72
Production
Well
LHPSD1
2/
22/
2002
2.37
Production
Well
LHPSD1
3/
26/
2002
2.99
Production
Well
LHPSD1
4/
23/
2002
2.02
Production
Well
LHPSD1
8/
21/
2002
3.65
Production
Well
LHPSD1
10/
16/
2002
3.41
Production
Well
LHPSD1
2/
26/
2003
3.38
Production
Well
LHPSD1
5/
28/
2003
3.34
Production
Well
LHPSD2
12/
20/
2001
3.72
Production
Well
LHPSD2
12/
20/
2001
3.52
duplicate
LHPSD2
1/
21/
2002
2.97
Production
Well
LHPSD2
2/
22/
2002
2.03
Production
Well
LHPSD2
2/
22/
2002
2.07
duplicate
LHPSD2
3/
26/
2002
3.31
Production
Well
LHPSD2
4/
23/
2002
3.4
Production
Well
LHPSD2
8/
21/
2002
4.26
Production
Well
LHPSD2
10/
16/
2002
3.98
Production
Well
LHPSD2
2/
26/
2003
3.62
Production
Well
LHPSD2
5/
28/
2003
4.31
Production
Well
LHPSD3
12/
20/
2001
0.844
Production
Well
LHPSD3
1/
21/
2002
0.744
Production
Well
LHPSD3
2/
22/
2002
0.42
Production
Well
LHPSD3
3/
26/
2002
0.827
Production
Well
LHPSD3
4/
23/
2002
0.783
Production
Well
LHPSD3
8/
21/
2002
0.952
Production
Well
LHPSD3
10/
16/
2002
0.495
Production
Well
LHPSD3
10/
16/
2002
0.434
duplicate
LHPSD3
2/
26/
2003
0.733
Production
Well
LHPSD3
5/
28/
2003
0.921
Production
Well
LHPSD5
12/
20/
2001
7.66
Production
Well
LHPSD5
1/
21/
2002
6.22
Production
Well
LHPSD5
1/
21/
2002
6.14
duplicate
LHPSD5
2/
22/
2002
5.69
Production
Well
LHPSD5
3/
26/
2002
6.57
Production
Well
LHPSD5
4/
23/
2002
6.11
Production
Well
LHPSD5
8/
21/
2002
8.09
Production
Well
LHPSD5
10/
16/
2002
8.58
Production
Well
LHPSD5
2/
26/
2003
6.93
Production
Well
LHPSD5
2/
26/
2003
7.16
duplicate
LHPSD5
5/
28/
2003
6.92
Production
Well
LHPSDTW1
1/
22/
2002
2.16
Test
well
LHPSDTW1
8/
21/
2002
0.81
Test
well
LHPSDTW2
1/
22/
2002
0.103
Test
well
LHPSDTW2
8/
21/
2002
0.081
Test
well
LHPSDTW3
1/
22/
2002
4.48
Test
well
LHPSDTW3
8/
21/
2002
4.17
Test
well
LHPSDTW4
1/
22/
2002
37.1
Test
well
Active
Sampling
Locations
1/
6/
2004
1
of
6
Tab
3.13
Table
3­
13
Table
3.13
Summary
of
C­
8
in
Groundwater
Public
Water
Supplies,
West
Virginia
and
Ohio
Dupont
Washington
Works
Facility,
Washington
WV
Active
Sampling
Locations
LHPSDTW4
3/
26/
2002
33.3
Test
well
LHPSDTW4
4/
23/
2002
28.7
Test
well
LHPSDTW4
8/
21/
2002
12.3
Test
well
LHPSDTW4
10/
16/
2002
14.5
Test
well
LHPSDTW4
2/
26/
2003
22.5
Test
well
LHPSDTW4
2/
26/
2003
22.5
Test
well
LHPSDTW4
5/
28/
2003
33.3
Test
Well
LHPSDTW4
5/
28/
2003
33.5
duplicate
LHPSDTW5
8/
21/
2002
6.26
Test
well
LHPSDTW6
1/
22/
2002
1.79
Test
well
LHPSDTW6
8/
21/
2002
1.15
Test
well
LHPSDTW6
8/
21/
2002
1.23
duplicate
LHPSDTW9
1/
22/
2002
0.364
Test
well
LHPSDTW9
8/
21/
2002
0.812
Test
well
LHPSDTW10
1/
21/
2002
1.9
Test
well
LHPSDTW10
8/
21/
2002
1.1
Test
well
LHPSDTW11
1/
21/
2002
1.41
Test
well
LHPSDTW11
8/
21/
2002
1.73
Test
well
LHPSDTW12
1/
21/
2002
0.758
Test
well
LHPSDTW12
8/
21/
2002
0.824
Test
well
LHPSDEP001
1/
22/
2002
1.69
Finished
Water
LHPSDEP001
3/
26/
2002
2.62
Finished
Water
LHPSDEP001
4/
23/
2002
1.93
Finished
Water
LHPSDEP001
10/
16/
2002
4.29
Finished
Water
LHPSDEP001
2/
26/
2003
2.33
Finished
Water
LHPSDEP001
5/
28/
2003
2.54
Finished
Water
LHTORCHBS
1/
22/
2002
1.85
Booster
Station
Sample
BARTLETTCC
1/
22/
2002
1.94
Booster
Station
Sample
339B
STA
1/
22/
2002
1.81
Booster
Station
Sample
Lubeck,
WV
LPSDAT
3/
28/
2002
0.69
After
Treatment
Sample
LPSDAT
4/
26/
2002
0.652
After
Treatment
Sample
LPSDAT
6/
24/
2002
0.6
After
Treatment
Sample
LPSDAT
10/
15/
2002
0.653
After
Treatment
Sample
LPSDAT
2/
25/
2003
0.565
After
Treatment
Sample
LPSDAT
5/
27/
2003
0.539
After
Treatment
Sample
LPSD
WELL
A
1/
3/
2002
0.764
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
A
2/
21/
2002
0.683
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
A
3/
28/
2002
0.796
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
A
4/
26/
2002
0.938
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
A
7/
24/
2002
0.753
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
A
10/
15/
2002
0.856
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
A
2/
25/
2003
0.777
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
A
5/
27/
2003
0.746
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
B
2/
21/
2002
0.61
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
B
3/
28/
2002
0.551
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
B
4/
26/
2002
0.532
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
B
7/
24/
2002
0.443
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
B
10/
15/
2002
0.537
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
B
2/
25/
2003
0.48
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
B
5/
27/
2003
0.488
Production
Well
1/
6/
2004
2
of
6
Tab
3.13
Table
3­
13
Table
3.13
Summary
of
C­
8
in
Groundwater
Public
Water
Supplies,
West
Virginia
and
Ohio
Dupont
Washington
Works
Facility,
Washington
WV
Active
Sampling
Locations
LPSD
WELL
C
1/
3/
2002
0.592
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
C
2/
21/
2002
0.479
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
C
3/
28/
2002
0.491
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
C
4/
26/
2002
0.471
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
C
7/
24/
2002
0.398
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
C
10/
15/
2002
0.504
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
C
2/
25/
2003
0.429
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
C
5/
27/
2003
0.428
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
D
1/
3/
2002
0.758
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
D
2/
21/
2002
0.725
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
D
3/
28/
2002
0.692
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
D
4/
26/
2002
0.506
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
D
7/
24/
2002
0.444
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
D
10/
15/
2002
0.517
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
D
2/
25/
2003
0.397
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
D
5/
27/
2003
0.401
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
E
1/
3/
2002
0.332
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
E
2/
21/
2002
1
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
E
3/
28/
2002
1.09
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
E
4/
26/
2002
1.11
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
E
7/
24/
2002
1.02
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
E
10/
15/
2002
1.21
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
E
2/
25/
2003
1.09
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
E
5/
27/
2003
1.05
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
F
1/
3/
2002
1.04
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
F
2/
21/
2002
0.313
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
F
3/
28/
2002
0.358
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
F
3/
28/
2002
0.352
duplicate
LPSD
WELL
F
4/
26/
2002
0.332
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
F
7/
24/
2002
0.284
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
F
7/
24/
2002
0.283
duplicate
LPSD
WELL
F
10/
15/
2002
0.355
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
F
2/
25/
2003
Restricted
Access*
Production
Well
LPSD
WELL
F
5/
27/
2003
0.319
Production
Well
Tuppers
Plains
PSD,
OH
TPPSDPT
2/
6/
2002
0.372
Before
Treatment
Sample
TPPSDPT
3/
25/
2002
0.347
Before
Treatment
Sample
TPPSDPT
7/
23/
2002
0.24
Before
Treatment
Sample
TPPSDPT
10/
15/
2002
0.226
Before
Treatment
Sample
TPPSDPT
2/
25/
2003
0.285
Before
Treatment
Sample
TPPSDPT
5/
27/
2003
0.288
Before
Treatment
Sample
TPPSDAT
2/
6/
2002
0.361
After
Treatment
Sample
TPPSDAT
3/
25/
2002
0.358
After
Treatment
Sample
TPPSDAT
4/
24/
2002
0.363
After
Treatment
Sample
TPPSDAT
7/
23/
2002
0.246
After
Treatment
Sample
TPPSDAT
10/
15/
2002
0.268
After
Treatment
Sample
TPPSDAT
2/
25/
2003
0.291
After
Treatment
Sample
TPPSDAT
5/
27/
2003
0.287
After
Treatment
Sample
TPPSDPW1
2/
6/
2002
0.726
Production
Well
TPPSDPW1
3/
25/
2002
0.705
Production
Well
TPPSDPW1
4/
24/
2002
0.702
Production
Well
1/
6/
2004
3
of
6
Tab
3.13
Table
3­
13
Table
3.13
Summary
of
C­
8
in
Groundwater
Public
Water
Supplies,
West
Virginia
and
Ohio
Dupont
Washington
Works
Facility,
Washington
WV
Active
Sampling
Locations
TPPSDPW1
7/
23/
2002
0.588
Production
Well
TPPSDPW1
10/
15/
2002
0.486
Production
Well
TPPSDPW1
2/
25/
2003
0.532
Production
Well
TPPSDPW1
5/
27/
2003
0.541
Production
Well
TPPSDPW1
5/
27/
2003
0.52
duplicate
TPPSDPW2
2/
6/
2002
0.417
Production
Well
TPPSDPW2
3/
25/
2002
0.327
Production
Well
TPPSDPW2
4/
24/
2002
0.371
Production
Well
TPPSDPW2
7/
23/
2002
0.235
Production
Well
TPPSDPW2
10/
15/
2002
0.255
Production
Well
TPPSDPW2
2/
25/
2003
0.356
Production
Well
TPPSDPW2
5/
27/
2003
0.35
Production
Well
TPPSDPW3
2/
6/
2002
NQ
(<
0.050)
Production
Well
TPPSDPW3
3/
25/
2002
NQ
(<
0.050)
Production
Well
TPPSDPW3
7/
23/
2002
ND
(<
0.010)
Production
Well
TPPSDPW3
10/
15/
2002
ND
(<
0.010)
Production
Well
TPPSDPW3
2/
25/
2003
NQ
(<
0.050)
Production
Well
TPPSDPW3
5/
27/
2003
ND
(<
0.010)
Production
Well
TPPSDPW4
2/
6/
2002
0.0734
Production
Well
TPPSDPW4
3/
25/
2002
0.07
Production
Well
TPPSDPW4
7/
23/
2002
0.052
Production
Well
TPPSDPW4
10/
15/
2002
0.076
Production
Well
TPPSDPW4
2/
25/
2003
NQ
(<
0.050)
Production
Well
TPPSDPW4
5/
27/
2003
0.078
Production
Well
TPPSDPW5
2/
6/
2002
0.201
Production
Well
TPPSDPW5
3/
25/
2002
0.201
Production
Well
TPPSDPW5
7/
23/
2002
0.216
Production
Well
TPPSDPW5
10/
15/
2002
0.229
Production
Well
TPPSDPW5
2/
25/
2003
0.297
Production
Well
TPPSDPW5
5/
27/
2003
Not
Pumping**
Production
Well
TPPSDPW6
2/
6/
2002
0.649
Production
Well
TPPSDPW6
3/
25/
2002
0.634
Production
Well
TPPSDPW6
4/
24/
2002
0.62
Production
Well
TPPSDPW6
7/
23/
2002
0.62
Production
Well
TPPSDPW6
10/
15/
2002
0.433
Production
Well
TPPSDPW6
2/
25/
2003
0.542
Production
Well
TPPSDPW6
5/
27/
2003
0.542
Production
Well
Location
Sample
ID
Sample
Date
C­
8
ug/
l
Comments
Parkersburg,
WV
PPSDPT
3/
6/
2002
NQ
(<
0.050)
Before
Treatment
Sample
PPSDAT
3/
6/
2002
NQ
(<
0.050)
After
Treatment
Sample
PPSDAT
4/
25/
2002
NQ
(<
0.050)
After
Treatment
Sample
PPSDRANY1
3/
6/
2002
0.0693
Production
Well
PPSDRANY1
3/
6/
2002
0.0686
duplicate
PPSDRANY1
4/
25/
2002
0.0746
Production
Well
PPSDRANY2
3/
6/
2002
ND
(<
0.010)
Production
Well
PPSDRANY3
3/
6/
2002
ND
(<
0.010)
Production
Well
PPSDRANY4
3/
6/
2002
ND
(<
0.010)
Production
Well
PPSDRANY5
3/
6/
2002
ND
(<
0.010)
Production
Well
Belpre,
OH
BELPSDAT
2/
7/
2002
0.0818
After
Treatment
Sample
Historic
Sampling
Locations
1/
6/
2004
4
of
6
Tab
3.13
Table
3­
13
Table
3.13
Summary
of
C­
8
in
Groundwater
Public
Water
Supplies,
West
Virginia
and
Ohio
Dupont
Washington
Works
Facility,
Washington
WV
Active
Sampling
Locations
BELPSDAT
3/
25/
2002
0.113
After
Treatment
Sample
BELPSDAT
4/
23/
2002
0.12
After
Treatment
Sample
BELPSDPW1
2/
7/
2002
0.0995
Production
Well
BELPSDPW1
3/
25/
2002
0.13
Production
Well
BELPSDPW2
2/
7/
2002
NQ
(<
0.050)
Production
Well
BELPSDPW2
2/
7/
2002
NQ
(<
0.050)
duplicate
BELPSDPW2
3/
25/
2002
NQ
(<
0.050)
Production
Well
BELPSDPW3
3/
25/
2002
0.141
Production
Well
BELPSDPW3
4/
23/
2002
0.12
Production
Well
BELPSDPW4
2/
7/
2002
0.101
Production
Well
BELPSDPW4
3/
25/
2002
0.133
Production
Well
BELPSDPW4
4/
23/
2002
0.114
Production
Well
BELPSDPW5
2/
7/
2002
0.107
Production
Well
BELPSDPW5
3/
25/
2002
0.103
Production
Well
BELPSDPW5
4/
23/
2002
0.107
Production
Well
BELPSDPW5
4/
23/
2002
0.111
duplicate
Blennerhassett
Island,
WV
BLENI
TW0
2/
21/
2002
ND
(<
0.010)
Test
well
BLENI
TW7
2/
21/
2002
NQ
(<
0.050)
Test
well
BLENI
W19A
2/
21/
2002
0.316
Test
well
BLENISLEPS1
1/
30/
2002
0.165
Drinking
Supply
Well
General
Electric,
WV
GE
WELL
3
1/
3/
2002
1.78
Production
Well
GE
WELL
3
1/
3/
2002
1.87
duplicate
GE
WELL
3
2/
21/
2002
1.75
Production
Well
GE
WELL
3
4/
26/
2002
1.84
Production
Well
Belleville
Hydra
Plant,
WV
BELLEVILLELD
1/
29/
2002
NQ
(<
0.050)
Miscellaneous
Use
Ravenswood
Municipal,
WV
COR
ASIN
3/
27/
2002
ND
(<
0.010)
Air
Stripper
In
COR
ASOUT
3/
27/
2002
NQ
(<
0.050)
Air
Stripper
Out
COR
BLEND
AT
3/
27/
2002
ND
(<
0.010)
Blend
After
Treatment
COR
WELL1
3/
27/
2002
ND
(<
0.010)
Production
Well
COR
WELL
2
3/
27/
2002
ND
(<
0.010)
Production
Well
COR
WELL3
3/
27/
2002
ND
(<
0.010)
Production
Well
COR
WELL
4
3/
27/
2002
ND
(<
0.010)
Production
Well
COR
WELL
5
3/
27/
2002
ND
(<
0.010)
Production
Well
Mason
County
PSD,
WV
MASONCPSD1
1/
29/
2002
NQ
(<
0.050)
Production
Well
MASONCPSD1
3/
27/
2002
NQ
(<
0.050)
Production
Well
MASONCPSD1
4/
25/
2002
NQ
(<
0.050)
Production
Well
MASONCPSD2
1/
29/
2002
0.0618
Production
Well
MASONCPSD2
3/
27/
2002
0.0838
Production
Well
MASONCPSD2
4/
25/
2002
0.0714
Production
Well
MASONCPSD3
1/
29/
2002
0.0707
Production
Well
MASONCPSD3
3/
27/
2002
0.102
Production
Well
MASONCPSD3
4/
25/
2002
0.063
Production
Well
Racine
Locks
and
Dam,
WV
RACINELD
1/
4/
2002
0.518
Miscellaneous
Use
Village
of
Racine,
OH
VORAT
3/
26/
2002
ND
(<
0.010)
After
Treatment
Sample
VORRV3
3/
26/
2002
ND
(<
0.010)
Production
Well
VORWELL1
3/
26/
2002
ND
(<
0.010)
Production
Well
VORWELL2
3/
26/
2002
ND
(<
0.010)
Production
Well
New
Haven
Water
Dept.,
WV
NHPSDAT
4/
10/
2002
ND
(<
0.010)
After
Treatment
Sample
NHPSDPW1
4/
10/
2002
NQ
(<
0.050)
Production
Well
New
Haven
Water
Dept.,
WV
NHPSDPW1
4/
10/
2002
NQ
(<
0.050)
duplicate
Village
of
Syracuse,
OH
VOSAT
3/
29/
2002
NQ
(<
0.050)
After
Treatment
Sample
VOSAT
4/
24/
2002
ND
(<
0.010)
After
Treatment
Sample
VOS
NORTH
2
3/
29/
2002
NQ
(<
0.050)
Production
Well
VOS
NORTH
2
4/
24/
2002
0.491
Production
Well
VOS
SOUTH
R3
3/
26/
2002
0.208
Production
Well
1/
6/
2004
5
of
6
Tab
3.13
Table
3­
13
Table
3.13
Summary
of
C­
8
in
Groundwater
Public
Water
Supplies,
West
Virginia
and
Ohio
Dupont
Washington
Works
Facility,
Washington
WV
Active
Sampling
Locations
VOS
SOUTH
R3
4/
24/
2002
ND
(<
0.010)
Production
Well
Village
of
Pomeroy,
OH
VOPAT
3/
26/
2002
0.0659
After
Treatment
Sample
VOPAT
4/
24/
2002
0.0628
After
Treatment
Sample
VOPWELL1
4/
24/
2002
ND
(<
0.010)
Production
Well
VOPWELL2
3/
26/
2002
0.0689
Production
Well
VOPWELL2
4/
24/
2002
ND
(<
0.010)
Production
Well
VOPWELL4
3/
26/
2002
0.0851
Production
Well
VOPWELL4
4/
24/
2002
0.0712
Production
Well
ND
=
Not
Detected
at
or
above
the
limit
of
detection
(
LOD).

The
listed
LOD
is
approximate
and
varies
by
instrument
and
over
time.

NQ
=
Not
Quantifiable.
Detected
at
a
level
above
the
LOD
and
below
the
limit
of
quantification
(
LOQ).

All
C­
8
results
are
reported
in
ug/
l.

Misc.
=
Miscellaneous
water
use
is
not
used
for
drinking.

*
LPSD
Well
F
was
inaccessible
on
2/
25/
03
due
to
flooding
conditions.

**
TPPSD
Production
Well
5
was
not
pumping
during
this
sampling
event.

1/
6/
2004
6
of
6
Tab
3.13
Table
3­
13
Table
4.1
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Groundwater
Local
Landfill
Washington,
WV
01/
06/
04
1
of
2
Table2.1B.
doc
Active
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
A­
Zone
7/
21/
03
72.9
5/
13/
03
65.9
3/
4/
03
52.4
10/
15/
02
79.6
9/
03/
02
63.5
5/
20/
02
57.7
3/
28/
02
47.2
2/
25/
02
50.2
1/
27/
02
58.4
12/
13/
01
54.60
5/
16/
2001
1.4
5/
11/
2000
10
5/
19/
1999
16.2
5/
27/
1998
26
LLMW­
4
4/
11/
1996
39
7/
21/
03
17.2
5/
13/
03
19.4
3/
4/
03
16.1
10/
15/
02
19.9
10/
15/
02
(
dup)
17.0
9/
03/
02
13.7
5/
20/
02
18.6
3/
28/
02
11.5
2/
25/
02
10.1
1/
27/
02
12.2
12/
13/
01
11.90
5/
16/
2001
3
5/
10/
2000
1.42
5/
19/
1999
1.32
5/
27/
1998
9
LLMW­
6
4/
11/
1996
15
7/
21/
03
0.063
5/
13/
03
0.0657
3/
4/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
10/
15/
02
0.0569
9/
03/
02
NQ
(<
0.05)
5/
20/
02
NQ
(<
0.05)
3/
28/
02
NQ
(<
0.05)
2/
25/
02
NQ
(<
0.05)
1/
27/
02
NQ
(<
0.05)
12/
13/
01
ND
(<
0.01)
5/
16/
2001
0.039
J
5/
10/
2000
<
0.029
5/
20/
1999
0.046
J
5/
27/
1998
<
0.1
LLMW­
9
4/
11/
1996
0.14
7/
21/
03
0.253
5/
13/
03
0.302
5/
13/
03
(
dup)
0.304
3/
4/
03
0.300
3/
4/
03
(
dup)
0.318
10/
15/
02
0.395
9/
03/
02
0.357
LLMW­
10
5/
20/
02
0.56
Table
4.1
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Groundwater
Local
Landfill
Washington,
WV
01/
06/
04
2
of
2
Table2.1B.
doc
Active
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
A­
Zone
3/
28/
02
0.698
2/
25/
02
1.12
1/
27/
02
0.162
12/
13/
01
0.133
5/
20/
1999
0.15
LLMW­
10
(
continued)

5/
28/
1998
0.22
B­
Zone
7/
31/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
5/
14/
03
0.0839
3/
3/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
LLMW­
12B
10/
8/
02
0.0658
C­
Zone
7/
31/
03
1.67
5/
14/
03
2.09
3/
4/
03
2.05
LLMW­
11A
10/
8/
02
2.22
C­
Zone
7/
31/
03
5.11
5/
14/
03
6.43
3/
3/
03
6.38
LLMW­
13B
10/
8/
02
6.61
7/
31/
03
0.322
5/
14/
03
0.646
3/
3/
03
0.317
LLMW­
14B
10/
9/
02
0.488
D­
Zone
7/
31/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
5/
21/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
3/
4/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
LLMW­
11B
10/
8/
02
NQ
(<
0.05)

J=
estimated
value
(
below
laboratory
quantitation
limit)
ND=
Not
Detected
at
or
above
the
limit
of
detection
(
LOD)
NQ=
Not
Quantifiable.
Detected
at
a
concentration
above
the
LOD
and
below
the
limit
of
quantification
(
LOQ).
Note:
Analytical
method
changed
as
of
November
2001
(
see
Section
2.0
for
details).
Table
4.2
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Surface
Water
Local
Landfill
Washington,
WV
01/
06/
04
1
of
3
Table
4­
2
Active
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
9/
17/
03
12.3
8/
13/
03
10.9
7/
24/
03
9.75
6/
13/
03
13.4
5/
21/
03
19.3
4/
30/
03
18.1
3/
29/
03
15.9
2/
28/
03
No­
flow
conditions
1/
31/
03
No­
flow
conditions
12/
13/
02
10.7
11/
30/
02
No­
flow
conditions
10/
31/
02
No­
flow
conditions
9/
30/
02
No­
flow
conditions
8/
26/
02
No­
flow
conditions
7/
1/
02
11.2
6/
13/
02
9.29
5/
21/
02
No­
flow
conditions
4/
29/
02
14.5
OUTFALL
004
(
New)

3/
26/
02
14.6
9/
17/
03
No­
flow
conditions
8/
13/
03
35.0
7/
24/
03
7.93
6/
13/
03
20.9
5/
21/
03
21.0
4/
30/
03
12.5
3/
31/
02
No­
flow
conditions
2/
28/
03
No­
flow
conditions
1/
31/
03
No­
flow
conditions
12/
13/
02
9.51
11/
30/
02
No­
flow
conditions
10/
31/
02
No­
flow
conditions
9/
30/
02
No­
flow
conditions
8/
26/
02
No­
flow
conditions
7/
1/
02
No­
flow
conditions
6/
13/
02
No­
flow
conditions
5/
21/
02
No­
flow
conditions
4/
29/
02
34.3
OUTFALL
005
(
New)

3/
26/
02
16.0
9/
17/
03
No­
flow
conditions
8/
13/
03
No­
flow
conditions
7/
24/
03
29.5
6/
13/
03
39.2
5/
21/
03
47.9
4/
30/
03
50.1
3/
29/
03
44.9
2/
28/
03
No­
flow
conditions
1/
31/
03
No­
flow
conditions
12/
13/
02
38.1
11/
30/
02
No­
flow
conditions
10/
31/
02
No­
flow
conditions
9/
30/
02
No­
flow
conditions
8/
26/
02
No­
flow
conditions
7/
1/
02
32.1
6/
13/
02
27.3
5/
21/
02
No­
flow
conditions
OUTFALL
005
(
Old)/
SS1
4/
29/
02
40.9
Table
4.2
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Surface
Water
Local
Landfill
Washington,
WV
01/
06/
04
2
of
3
Table
4­
2
Active
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
3/
26/
02
39.0
2/
20/
02
46.0
1/
11/
02
51.4
12/
13/
01
No­
flow
conditions
9/
27/
2000
13.3
12/
10/
1999
34
6/
3/
1999
6.8
6/
2/
1998
39
5/
29/
1997
41
4/
2/
1996
39
OUTFALL
005
(
Old)/
SS1
(
cont.)

2/
16/
1994
35
9/
17/
03
96.7
8/
13/
03
63.3
7/
24/
03
60.4
6/
13/
03
59.7
5/
21/
03
48.4
4/
30/
03
74.1
3/
28/
03
45.4
2/
26/
03
43.9
1/
29/
03
72.3
12/
16/
02
49.5
11/
19/
02
76.7
10/
31/
02
78.6
9/
30/
02
115.0
8/
26/
02
70.3
7/
1/
02
63.0
6/
13/
02
38.0
5/
21/
02
40.0
4/
29/
02
48.2
3/
25/
02
36.4
2/
20/
02
63.10
1/
23/
02
81.4
12/
13/
01
82.40
9/
14/
2000
12
6/
3/
1999
15
OUTLET
101
6/
2/
1998
54
6/
13/
03
87.9
5/
21/
03
83.2
4/
30/
03
98.0
12/
16/
02
81.7
OUTLET
LM1
(
LEACHATE)
/
INLET
002
11/
21/
02
120.0
Historic
Sampling
Locations
6/
13/
03
14.4
5/
21/
03
20.2
4/
30/
03
16.8
3/
29/
03
14.7
2/
28/
03
No­
flow
conditions
1/
31/
03
No­
flow
conditions
12/
13/
02
12.5
11/
30/
02
No­
flow
conditions
10/
31/
02
No­
flow
conditions
9/
30/
02
No­
flow
conditions
OUTFALL
004
(
Old)

8/
26/
02
No­
flow
conditions
Table
4.2
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Surface
Water
Local
Landfill
Washington,
WV
01/
06/
04
3
of
3
Table
4­
2
Historic
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
7/
1/
02
11.6
6/
13/
02
10.0
5/
21/
02
No­
flow
conditions
4/
29/
02
15
3/
26/
02
1.54
2/
20/
02
10.9
1/
24/
02
11.4
12/
13/
01
No­
flow
conditions
9/
27/
2000
4.73
12/
10/
1999
7.1
6/
3/
1999
3.06
6/
2/
1998
12
5/
29/
1997
13
4/
2/
1996
13
OUTFALL
004
(
Old)
(
cont.)

2/
16/
1994
11
LEACHATE
2/
16/
1994
31
5/
29/
1997
80
OUTLET
001
4/
2/
1996
61
5/
29/
1997
<
0.2
OUTLET
002
4/
2/
1996
72
5/
29/
1997
23
OUTLET
003
4/
2/
1996
20
5/
29/
1997
11
STREAM
1
4/
2/
1996
7.2
9/
14/
2000
4.12
12/
29/
1999
10.7
6/
2/
1998
15
STREAM
2
4/
2/
1996
14
Note:
Analytical
method
changed
as
of
November
2001
(
see
Section
2.0
for
details).
Table
5.3
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Groundwater
Letart
Landfill,
Letart,
WV
01/
06/
04
1
of
6
Table
5­
3
Active
Sampling
Locations
A­
Zone
Wells
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)

7/
23/
03
57200
5/
21/
03
27300
3/
12/
03
25000
10/
14/
02
25900
8/
29/
02
23000
5/
24/
02
30500
3/
29/
02
20600
2/
24/
02
18400
1/
26/
02
29400
12/
10/
01
24600
7/
19/
01
6100
1/
31/
01
9190
10/
4/
00
10600
7/
24/
00
8990
4/
3/
00
13600
1/
13/
00
17400
10/
21/
99
12600
7/
20/
99
6920
5/
28/
98
24000
7/
23/
97
5100
4/
17/
96
1700
11/
22/
91
68
LMW­
1
3/
22/
91
60
7/
23/
03
273
5/
21/
03
385
3/
12/
03
218
10/
14/
02
300
8/
27/
02
197
5/
24/
02
567
3/
29/
02
324
2/
24/
02
180
1/
26/
02
496
12/
10/
01
334
7/
20/
01
242
1/
31/
01
249
10/
4/
00
231
7/
25/
00
158
4/
3/
00
211
1/
13/
00
219
10/
20/
99
339
7/
20/
99
78.3
5/
28/
98
260
7/
23/
97
53
4/
17/
96
15
LMW­
7
11/
22/
91
0.1
Table
5.3
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Groundwater
Letart
Landfill,
Letart,
WV
01/
06/
04
2
of
6
Table
5­
3
Active
Sampling
Locations
A­
Zone
Wells
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)

7/
23/
03
2780
5/
20/
03
3100
3/
12/
03
1720
10/
14/
02
3480
8/
29/
02
3100
5/
24/
02
4020
3/
29/
02
3520
2/
23/
02
2230
1/
26/
02
3930
12/
10/
01
3240
7/
19/
01
1120
1/
30/
01
2650
10/
4/
00
2300
7/
24/
00
2160
4/
3/
00
2180
1/
13/
00
2100
10/
20/
99
3260
7/
20/
99
1790
5/
28/
98
2700
7/
23/
97
2000
4/
17/
96
2200
LMW­
8
11/
22/
91
280
C­
Zone
Wells
7/
24/
03
2060
5/
21/
03
2030
3/
11/
03
Dry
no
sample
10/
11/
02
NQ
(<
0.05)
8/
26/
02
Dry
no
sample
5/
24/
02
2270
3/
27/
02
1760
2/
24/
02
1920
1/
29/
02
1700
12/
13/
01
1520
11/
22/
91
1000
LMW­
3
3/
22/
91
390
7/
24/
03
473
5/
21/
03
245
3/
11/
03
134
10/
11/
02
112
8/
26/
02
Dry
no
sample
5/
21/
02
87.6
3/
27/
02
93.6
2/
23/
02
82.2
1/
26/
02
99.3
12/
11/
01
94.4
11/
22/
91
0.8
LMW­
5A
3/
22/
91
1.6
Table
5.3
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Groundwater
Letart
Landfill,
Letart,
WV
01/
06/
04
3
of
6
Table
5­
3
Active
Sampling
Locations
D/
E­
Zone
Wells
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)

7/
22/
03
146
5/
19/
03
200
3/
11/
03
144
10/
11/
02
204
8/
26/
02
Dry­
no
sample
5/
24/
02
134
3/
27/
02
132
2/
23/
02
101
1/
26/
02
98.6
12/
11/
01
100
7/
19/
99
60.3
11/
22/
91
350
LMW­
3A
3/
22/
91
380
7/
22/
03
992
5/
19/
03
1280
3/
11/
03
1520
10/
11/
02
2840
8/
27/
02
1410
5/
21/
02
1690
3/
27/
02
2620
2/
23/
02
2250
1/
26/
02
3060
12/
13/
01
1580
4/
3/
00
272
1/
14/
00
172
11/
22/
91
830
LMW­
4
3/
28/
91
690
7/
22/
03
1800
5/
19/
03
2010
5/
19/
03
(
dup)
1660
3/
11/
03
1470
10/
11/
02
2230
10/
11/
02
(
dup)
2280
8/
27/
02
1480
8/
27/
02
(
dup)
*
1340
5/
21/
02
1720
5/
21/
02
(
dup)
*
1630
3/
27/
02
1810
3/
27/
02
(
dup)
1850
2/
23/
02
1460
2/
23/
02(
dup)
1490
1/
26/
02
1780
1/
26/
02
(
dup)
1890
12/
11/
01
1880
7/
20/
01
483
7/
20/
01(
dup)
592
LMW­
5B
1/
31/
01
615
Table
5.3
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Groundwater
Letart
Landfill,
Letart,
WV
01/
06/
04
4
of
6
Table
5­
3
Active
Sampling
Locations
D/
E­
Zone
Wells
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)

10/
5/
00
1190.
J
10/
5/
00
(
dup)
780
7/
25/
00
900.
J
4/
3/
00
1100
4/
3/
00
(
dup)
1020
1/
14/
00
1030
10/
21/
99
1750
10/
21/
99
(
dup)
1700
7/
20/
99
445
7/
23/
97
480
9/
20/
94
530
3/
15/
94
1200
11/
22/
91
380
LMW­
5B
continued
3/
22/
91
340
7/
24/
03
Dry­
no
sample
5/
20/
03
Dry­
no
sample
3/
11/
03
Dry­
no
sample
LMW­
12
10/
10/
02
Dry­
no
sample
7/
24/
03
177
5/
19/
03
185
3/
11/
03
144
LMW­
13A
10/
10/
02
510
7/
24/
03
766
5/
19/
03
998
3/
11/
03
498
LMW­
14A
10/
10/
02
974
F­
Zone
Wells
7/
22/
03
1020
5/
20/
03
998
3/
12/
03
676
10/
14/
02
931
8/
27/
02
676
5/
24/
02
922
3/
29/
02
717
2/
24/
02
714
1/
26/
02
740
12/
11/
01
830
7/
19/
01
242
1/
30/
01
423
10/
5/
00
248
7/
25/
00
275
4/
3/
00
306
1/
14/
00
453
10/
21/
99
370
LMW­
2A
7/
20/
99
350
Table
5.3
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Groundwater
Letart
Landfill,
Letart,
WV
01/
06/
04
5
of
6
Table
5­
3
Active
Sampling
Locations
F­
Zone
Wells
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)

5/
28/
98
990
7/
23/
97
460
4/
17/
96
460
9/
20/
94
270
3/
15/
94
260
11/
22/
91
63
LMW­
2A
(
continued)

3/
22/
91
50
7/
23/
03
9.73
5/
21/
03
9.53
3/
13/
03
11.6
10/
14/
02
15.1
8/
27/
02
10.5
5/
24/
02
20.7
3/
29/
02
14.8
2/
24/
02
14.9
1/
26/
02
18.1
12/
11/
01
15.8
1/
13/
00
9.4
5/
28/
98
30
11/
22/
91
24
LMW­
6
3/
22/
91
25
7/
24/
03
Dry­
no
sample
5/
20/
03
Pump
problems
­
Not
sampled
3/
11/
03
Dry
no
sample
10/
17/
02
Instrumentation
problems
­
Not
sampled
8/
29/
02
Pump
problems
­
Not
sampled
5/
21/
02
0.298
3/
27/
02
0.136
2/
23/
02
0.126
1/
26/
02
0.133
LMW­
10
12/
13/
01
0.134
7/
22/
03
0.128
5/
20/
03
0.124
3/
12/
03
0.12
10/
14/
02
0.121
8/
27/
02
0.058
5/
21/
02
0.069
3/
29/
02
0.119
2/
24/
02
0.112
1/
26/
02
0.159
LMW­
11
12/
11/
01
0.128
7/
24/
03
4.97
5/
19/
03
0.603
3/
11/
03
0.149
LMW­
13B
10/
10/
02
0.0956
7/
24/
03
Dry­
no
sample
5/
19/
03
101
3/
12/
03
70.4
LMW­
14B
10/
10/
02
105
Table
5.3
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Groundwater
Letart
Landfill,
Letart,
WV
01/
06/
04
6
of
6
Table
5­
3
Active
Sampling
Locations
Under
F­
Zone
Wells
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)

7/
23/
03
0.803
5/
20/
03
0.856
3/
12/
03
0.625
10/
17/
02
0.907
8/
29/
02
0.479
5/
24/
02
0.715
3/
27/
02
0.631
2/
23/
02
0.617
1/
26/
02
0.875
12/
10/
01
0.845
LMW­
9
10/
7/
92
0.2
J
=
estimated
value
(
below
laboratory
quantitation
limit).
Note:
Analytical
method
changed
as
of
November
2001
(
see
Section
2.0
for
details).
*
Analytical
duplicates'
values
were
previously
inadvertently
omitted
from
the
tables.
Table
5.4
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Surface
Water
Letart
Landfill
Letart,
WV
01/
06/
04
1
of
3
Table
5­
4
Active
Sampling
Location
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
9/
16/
03
1950
8/
13/
03
867
7/
30/
03
No­
Flow
Conditions
6/
13/
03
Not
Sampled
*

5/
23/
03
Not
Sampled
*

4/
30/
03
Not
Sampled
*

3/
28/
03
Not
Sampled
*

2/
28/
03
Not
Sampled**
1/
24/
03
Frozen
12/
30/
02
1170
11/
25/
02
939
10/
31/
02
645
9/
27/
02
4.52
8/
30/
02
2050
7/
30/
02
1410
6/
28/
02
Not
Analyzed*
5/
30/
02
1630
4/
30/
02
443
3/
28/
02
131
2/
19/
02
355
1/
25/
02
50.1
12/
14/
01
36.1
11/
27/
2001
53.2
7/
20/
01
159
7/
25/
2000
1350
4/
3/
2000
1900
1/
14/
2000
920
002(
LEACHATE
BASIN)

10/
21/
1999
3240
Historic
Sampling
Locations
4/
30/
03
No­
Flow
Conditions
3/
31/
03
No­
Flow
Conditions
2/
28/
03
Not
Sampled**
1/
31/
03
No­
Flow
Conditions
12/
30/
02
No­
Flow
Conditions
11/
30/
02
No­
Flow
Conditions
10/
31/
02
No­
Flow
Conditions
9/
27/
02
0.170
8/
30/
02
No­
Flow
Conditions
7/
30/
02
No­
Flow
Conditions
6/
28/
02
Not
Analyzed*
5/
30/
02
0.282
4/
30/
02
0.0653
3/
28/
02
0.198
2/
19/
02
No­
Flow
Conditions
1/
25/
02
0.148
003
12/
14/
01
0.390
5/
21/
03
0.442
3/
13/
03
0.247
BRINKER'S
RUN
10/
14/
02
0.0612
4/
30/
03
Not
Sampled
*

3/
28/
03
Not
Sampled
*

2/
28/
03
Not
Sampled**
1/
24/
03
Frozen
12/
30/
02
415
CAP
RUNOFF
11/
25/
02
65.1
Table
5.4
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Surface
Water
Letart
Landfill
Letart,
WV
01/
06/
04
2
of
3
Table
5­
4
Historic
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
10/
31/
02
102
9/
27/
02
50.9
8/
30/
02
No­
Flow
Conditions
6/
28/
02
Not
Analyzed*
5/
30/
02
371
4/
30/
02
279
3/
28/
02
Not
Sampled
2/
19/
02
No­
Flow
Conditions
CAP
RUNOFF
(
cont.)

1/
25/
02
119
11/
27/
2001
53.2
7/
20/
01
159
7/
25/
2000
2250
LEACHATE
7/
20/
1999
1030
1/
14/
2000
1410
4/
3/
2000
1260
10/
21/
1999
2530
7/
19/
1999
1190
5/
28/
1998
1100
7/
23/
1997
1600
4/
17/
1996
1900
9/
20/
1994
2200
3/
15/
1994
730
12/
27/
1991
1300
11/
22/
1991
1000
4/
26/
1991
670
3/
22/
1991
340
2/
8/
1991
400
LOWER
POND
1/
18/
1991
1200
3/
12/
1992
0.3
N
SPRING
FLOW
3/
12/
1992
0.3
3/
28/
03
2.27
10/
31/
02
2.83
9/
27/
02
2.24
8/
30/
02
No­
Flow
Conditions
5/
30/
02
1.570
4/
30/
02
0.845
3/
28/
02
1.26
2/
19/
02
3.92
1/
25/
02
1.9
7/
20/
2001
2.01
7/
31/
2000
0.573
7/
20/
1999
2.23
7/
23/
1997
2
RT
33
STREAM
4/
17/
1996
1.8
3/
15/
1994
0.5
STREAM
MN
RD
9/
20/
1994
0.9
SW
SPRING
FLOW
3/
12/
1992
1
Table
5.4
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Surface
Water
Letart
Landfill
Letart,
WV
01/
06/
04
3
of
3
Table
5­
4
Historic
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
7/
19/
1999
517
5/
28/
1998
480
7/
23/
1997
<
200
4/
17/
1996
2100
3/
15/
1994
4400
12/
27/
1991
4100
11/
22/
1991
790
4/
26/
1991
930
3/
22/
1991
500
2/
8/
1991
2300
UPPER
POND
1/
18/
1991
2900
Note:
Analytical
method
changed
as
of
November
2001
(
see
Section
2.0
for
details).
*
Samples
were
taken
at
the
respective
surface
water
locations.
However,
due
to
an
error
by
the
courier,
the
samples
arrived
at
the
lab
warm
and
were
not
analyzed.
**
These
surface
water
locations
were
not
sampled
due
to
downed
trees
from
an
ice
storm
that
prohibited
access
to
the
landfill.
*
These
sampling
points
could
not
be
accessed
due
to
a
rock
slide
that
had
covered
the
sampling
locations.
Table
6.3
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Groundwater
Dry
Run
Landfill,
Lubeck,
WV
01/
06/
04
1
of
4
Table
6.3
Active
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
Overburden
8/
20/
03
1.63
5/
14/
03
1.59
2/
27/
03
0.727
10/
9/
02
1.13
8/
28/
02
0.785
5/
22/
02
1.24
3/
30/
02
0.843
2/
20/
02
0.822
1/
27/
02
0.824
12/
12/
01
1.04
7/
20/
00
0.212
7/
21/
99
0.096
5/
26/
98
0.27
7/
22/
97
0.36
DRMW­
6A
4/
10/
96
0.19
8/
20/
03
0.0612
5/
13/
03
0.0547
2/
27/
03
0.059
10/
9/
02
0.181
8/
28/
02
0.088
5/
22/
02
0.0832
3/
30/
02
0.0785
2/
20/
02
0.125
1/
25/
02
0.168
12/
12/
01
0.158
7/
19/
00
0.128
7/
21/
99
0.081
J
5/
26/
98
<
0.10
7/
22/
97
<
0.1
DRMW­
12A
4/
10/
96
<
0.1
8/
20/
03
0.0699
5/
13/
03
0.0649
2/
27/
03
0.050
2/
27/
03
(
dup)
0.052
10/
9/
02
0.258
10/
9/
02
(
dup)
0.242
8/
28/
02
NQ
5/
22/
02
NQ
3/
30/
02
NQ
3/
30/
02
(
dup)
NQ
2/
20/
02
NQ
1/
25/
02
0.073
1/
25/
02
(
dup)
0.085
12/
12/
01
0.215
7/
20/
00
ND
(
0.029)
7/
21/
99
5.4
DRMW­
12B
6/
16/
98
<
0.1
Table
6.3
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Groundwater
Dry
Run
Landfill,
Lubeck,
WV
01/
06/
04
2
of
4
Table
6.3
Active
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
Overburden
8/
20/
03
4.38
5/
13/
03
3.23
2/
27/
03
1.5
10/
9/
02
6.66
8/
28/
02
5.14
5/
22/
02
2.31
3/
30/
02
4
2/
20/
02
3.73
1/
25/
02
5.97
12/
12/
01
6.4
7/
20/
00
9.9
7/
21/
99
0.070
J
5/
26/
98
8.7
7/
22/
97
15
4/
10/
96
8.2
DRMW­
13A
4/
10/
1996
(
dup)
11
8/
21/
03
0.157
5/
16/
03
0.370
2/
28/
03
0.138
DRMW­
21A
10/
9/
02
0.27
A­
Zone
Wells
8/
22/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
5/
16/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
2/
28/
03
ND
(<
0.01)
DRMW­
16B
10/
8/
02
NQ
(<
0.05)
8/
21/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
3/
3/
03
Not
Sampled**
DRMW­
17B
10/
8/
02
0.155
8/
21/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
5/
15/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
3/
3/
03
Not
Sampled**
DRMW­
18B
10/
7/
02
ND
(<
0.01)
8/
21/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
5/
15/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
2/
28/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
DRMW­
19B
10/
7/
02
NQ
(<
0.05)
8/
22/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
5/
15/
03
ND
(<
0.01)
2/
28/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
DRMW­
20B
10/
8/
02
NQ
(<
0.05)
B­
Zone
Wells
8/
20/
03
0.0686
5/
13/
03
0.0714
5/
13/
03
(
dup)
0.0787
2/
27/
03
0.101
10/
9/
02
0.109
8/
28/
02
0.0626
5/
22/
02
0.0817
3/
30/
02
0.0929
2/
20/
02
0.11
1/
25/
02
0.116
12/
12/
01
0.086
7/
19/
00
0.16
7/
21/
99
0.134
5/
26/
98
<
0.10
7/
22/
97
<
0.1
DRMW­
12
4/
10/
96
<
0.1
Table
6.3
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Groundwater
Dry
Run
Landfill,
Lubeck,
WV
01/
06/
04
3
of
4
Table
6.3
Active
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
B­
Zone
Wells
8/
20/
03
17.8
5/
13/
03
22.8
2/
27/
03
15.0
10/
9/
02
20.9
8/
28/
02
13.1
8/
28/
02
(
dup)
*
14.6
5/
22/
02
16.9
3/
30/
02
12.6
2/
20/
02
11.5
1/
25/
02
16.5
12/
12/
01
9.86
7/
20/
00
9.8
7/
21/
99
3.6
5/
26/
98
9.2
DRMW­
13
7/
22/
97
7
8/
20/
03
4.77
5/
14/
03
4.55
3/
3/
03
4.64
10/
15/
02
4.92
8/
28/
02
3.99
5/
22/
02
5
5/
22/
02
(
dup)
*
4.66
3/
30/
02
4.91
2/
20/
02
3.65
1/
27/
02
4.35
12/
12/
01
4.94
7/
20/
00
0.763
DRMW­
15
7/
21/
99
0.263
C­
Zone
Wells
8/
21/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
5/
16/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
2/
28/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
DRMW­
21B
10/
9/
02
NQ
(<
0.05)
Above
A­
Zone
Wells
8/
20/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
5/
14/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
3/
3/
03
NQ
(<
0.05)
10/
15/
02
NQ
(<
0.05)
8/
28/
02
NQ
5/
22/
02
NQ
3/
30/
02
NQ
2/
20/
02
NQ
1/
27/
02
NQ
12/
12/
01
NQ
7/
20/
00
0.115
7/
21/
99
2.5
6/
16/
98
<
0.1
7/
21/
97
<
0.1
DRMW­
14
4/
10/
96
<
0.1
Table
6.3
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Groundwater
Dry
Run
Landfill,
Lubeck,
WV
01/
06/
04
4
of
4
Table
6.3
Historic
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)

7/
22/
1997
1.00
DRMW­
6
4/
10/
1996
0.97
ND
=
Not
Detected
at
or
above
the
limit
of
detection
(
LOD).
The
listed
LOD
is
approximate
and
varies
by
instrument
and
over
time.
NQ
=
Not
Quantifiable.
Detected
at
a
concentration
above
the
LOD
and
below
the
limit
of
quantification
(
LOQ).
J
=
estimated
value
(
below
laboratory
quantitation
limit).
Note:
Analytical
method
changed
as
of
November
2001
(
see
Section
2.0
for
details).
*
Analytical
duplicates'
values
were
previously
inadvertently
omitted
from
the
tables.
**
No
samples
were
collected
for
these
wells
because
snow
and
ice
blocked
the
way
for
the
truck
with
sampling
equipment
to
gain
access.
Only
water
levels
were
taken
for
these
wells.
Table
6.4
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Surface
Water
Dry
Run
Landfill
Lubeck,
WV
06/
16/
03
1
of
3
Table
6­
4
Active
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
9/
22/
03
37.5
8/
13/
03
38.6
7/
24/
03
39.7
6/
13/
03
30.5
5/
19/
03
88.8
4/
30/
03
131.0
3/
28/
03
88.5
2/
26/
03
69.0
1/
29/
03
88.4
12/
30/
02
56.9
11/
21/
02
64.6
10/
30/
02
81.7
9/
30/
02
No­
flow
conditions
8/
30/
02
No­
flow
conditions
7/
31/
02
No­
flow
conditions
7/
1/
02
No­
flow
conditions
6/
28/
02
No­
flow
conditions
5/
28/
02
30.9
4/
24/
02
41
3/
25/
02
71.6
2/
25/
02
43.9
1/
28/
02
41.6
12/
12/
01
No­
flow
conditions
10/
3/
2000
31.5
12/
29/
1999
66
5/
19/
1998
17
OUTLET
001
4/
9/
1996
86
9/
22/
03
16.1
8/
13/
03
No­
flow
conditions
7/
24/
03
27.6
6/
13/
03
10.3
5/
31/
03
No­
flow
conditions
4/
30/
03
No­
flow
conditions
3/
31/
03
No­
flow
conditions
2/
28/
03
No­
flow
conditions
1/
31/
03
No­
flow
conditions
12/
30/
02
No­
flow
conditions
11/
30/
02
No­
flow
conditions
10/
30/
02
No­
flow
conditions
9/
30/
02
No­
flow
conditions
8/
30/
02
No­
flow
conditions
7/
1/
02
25.3
6/
28/
02
No­
flow
conditions
5/
28/
02
No­
flow
conditions
4/
29/
02
20.1
3/
26/
02
6.77
2/
25/
02
No­
flow
conditions
1/
28/
02
No­
flow
conditions
OUTLET
003
12/
12/
01
No­
flow
conditions
9/
22/
03
0.354
8/
13/
03
No­
flow
conditions
7/
24/
03
0.243
6/
13/
03
0.461
5/
19/
03
0.543
4/
30/
03
No­
flow
conditions
3/
31/
03
No­
flow
conditions
2/
28/
03
No­
flow
conditions
1/
31/
03
No­
flow
conditions
12/
30/
02
No­
flow
conditions
11/
30/
02
No­
flow
conditions
10/
30/
02
No­
flow
conditions
OUTLET
004
9/
30/
02
No­
flow
conditions
Table
6.4
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Surface
Water
Dry
Run
Landfill
Lubeck,
WV
06/
16/
03
2
of
3
Table
6­
4
Active
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
8/
30/
02
No­
flow
conditions
7/
1/
02
0.70
6/
28/
02
No­
flow
conditions
5/
28/
02
No­
flow
conditions
4/
27/
02
No­
flow
conditions
3/
26/
02
158
2/
25/
02
No­
flow
conditions
1/
28/
02
No­
flow
conditions
OUTLET
004
(
continued)

12/
12/
01
No­
flow
conditions
Historic
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
DOWN
STREAM
4/
9/
1996
25
5/
20/
03
135
3/
28/
03
99.7
10/
30/
02
704
5/
28/
02
150
4/
24/
02
237
3/
25/
02
334
2/
25/
02
256
1/
28/
02
398
12/
12/
01
109
10/
3/
2000
27.4
12/
29/
1999
34
5/
19/
1998
56
DRLEACHATE
7/
22/
1997
62
5/
19/
03
48.7
3/
28/
03
53.3
10/
30/
02
38.8
5/
28/
02
67.4
4/
24/
02
33.4
3/
25/
02
66.7
2/
25/
02
37.1
1/
28/
02
29.3
POND
UNDERDRAIN
12/
12/
01
35.4
5/
19/
03
2.97
3/
28/
03
11.3
10/
30/
02
3.80
8/
30/
02
No­
flow
conditions
5/
28/
02
9.41
4/
24/
02
6.69
3/
25/
02
22.8
2/
25/
02
3.81
1/
28/
02
11.1
12/
12/
01
3.99
10/
3/
2000
10.3
12/
29/
1999
39
7/
14/
1998
0.88
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
4/
9/
1996
9.9
5/
19/
03
1.13
3/
28/
03
1.24
10/
30/
02
1.63
8/
30/
02
No­
flow
conditions
5/
28/
02
1.63
4/
24/
02
0.932
STREAM
SAMPLING
POINT#
1
3/
25/
02
1.06
Table
6.4
Summary
of
Analytical
Results:
C­
8
in
Surface
Water
Dry
Run
Landfill
Lubeck,
WV
06/
16/
03
3
of
3
Table
6­
4
Historic
Sampling
Locations
Sample
Date
C­
8
(
ug/
l)
2/
25/
02
0.850
1/
28/
02
0.893
12/
12/
01
1.19
10/
3/
2000
0.758
12/
29/
1999
0.54
STREAM
SAMPLING
POINT#
1
(
cont.)

5/
19/
1998
1
5/
19/
03
17.4
3/
28/
03
61.1
10/
30/
02
29.2
8/
20/
02
No­
flow
conditions
5/
28/
02
51.0
4/
24/
02
28.9
3/
25/
02
66.6
2/
25/
02
24.3
1/
28/
02
42.4
12/
12/
01
20.5
10/
3/
2000
27.6
12/
29/
1999
87
STREAM
SAMPLING
POINT#
2
5/
19/
1998
4.6
Note:
Analytical
method
changed
as
of
November
2001
(
see
Section
2.0
for
details).