Document ID: EPA-HQ-OECA-2010-0352-0002
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2010-08-23T04:00Z

SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 SUPPORTING STATEMENT

NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS (NESHAP) FOR
CLAY CERAMICS MANUFACTURING AND GLASS MANUFACTURING AREA SOURCES

 

PART A

1.0  Identification of the Information Collection

(a) Title and Number of the Information Collection.

	“NESHAP for Clay Ceramics Manufacturing, Glass Manufacturing, and
Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing Area Sources (40 CFR part 63,
subparts RRRRRR, and SSSSSS, TTTTTT) (Final Rule).”  This is a new
information collection request (ICR), and the EPA tracking number is
2274.02. 

 (b) Short Characterization.

	This ICR covers information collection requirements in the final area
source rules for Clay Ceramics Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63, subpart
RRRRRR), Glass Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63, subpart SSSSS), and
Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing (40 CFR part 63, subpart TTTTTT).

	The potential respondents are owners or operators of any existing or
new clay ceramics manufacturing facility, glass manufacturing facility,
or secondary nonferrous metals processing facility that is an area
source of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) emissions.  There are an
estimated 51 facilities subject to the NESHAP for the Clay Ceramics
Manufacturing area source category, an estimated 21 facilities subject
to the NESHAP for the Glass Manufacturing area source category, and an
estimated 10 facilities subject to the NESHAP for the Secondary
Nonferrous Metals Processing area source category.  The affected source
at a clay ceramics facility includes all kilns that fire glazed ceramic
ware and all glaze spray booths that use an atomizing (spray)
application technique.  The affected sources at a glass manufacturing
facility are the continuous glass melting furnaces.  The affected source
at a secondary nonferrous metals processing facility is the collection
of all furnace melting operations and crushing and screening operations
(if applicable) located at a secondary nonferrous metals processing
facility.  Clay ceramics, glass manufacturing, and secondary nonferrous
metals processing facilities are currently well-controlled in terms of
urban metal HAP emissions as a result of State and national standards,
permitting requirements, and management practices already taken by the
industry to reduce urban metal HAP.

Under the final Clay Ceramics Manufacturing area source rule, affected
sources will be subject to a series of equipment standards and/or
management practices.  Affected sources will be required to maintain the
peak temperature of kilns that fire glazed ceramic ware below 1540°C
(2800°F) and either use natural gas, or an equivalent clean-burning
fuel (e.g., propane), as the kiln fuel; alternatively, affected sources
will have the option of using an electric-powered kiln.  Affected
sources will also be required to maintain annual wet glaze usage records
to document whether the facility’s wet glaze usage is above or below
250 tons per year (tpy).  Affected sources located at a facility that
uses more than 250 tpy of wet glaze will be required to route emissions
from their glaze spray booths to an air pollution control device (APCD)
and operate and maintain the APCD according to the equipment
manufacturer’s specifications; alternatively, affected sources could
use glazes containing less than 0.1 (weight) percent HAP metals. 
Affected sources located at a facility that uses 250 tpy or less of wet
glaze will be required to employ waste minimization practices (e.g.,
high-volume, low-pressure (HVLP) spray equipment); alternatively,
affected sources could comply with the equipment standard or management
practice listed for facilities using more than 250 tpy of wet glaze.

Compliance requirements for clay ceramics facilities include conducting
daily checks of the kiln peak firing temperature; conducting initial and
periodic control device inspections, conducting daily visible emissions
(VE) tests, or complying with EPA-approved alternative monitoring
requirements for glaze spray booths; submitting initial notifications of
applicability and compliance status; and maintaining records of
monitoring and inspection data and notifications submitted to EPA. 
Existing and new sources will also be subject to requirements in the
General Provisions (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A), as specifically noted.

Under the final Glass Manufacturing area source rule, owners and
operators of continuous glass melting furnaces that produce at least 50
tpy of glass containing one or more HAP metal compounds as raw materials
will be required to meet emission limits.  Owners and operators of
affected furnaces will be required to conduct a one-time performance
test on each affected furnace to demonstrate compliance with the
emission limits.  However, if the furnace had been tested within the
previous 5 years and the test demonstrated compliance with the emission
limits in the final Glass Manufacturing area source rule, no additional
testing will be required.  Owners and operators will be allowed to
demonstrate compliance for identical furnaces by testing only one of the
furnaces.

For any existing affected furnace that is controlled with an
electrostatic precipitator (ESP), the final rule also will require
monitoring of secondary voltage and electrical current to each field of
the ESP.  For any existing affected furnace that is controlled with a
fabric filter, the final rule also will require monitoring of the fabric
filter inlet temperature.  The required monitoring must be performed any
time the affected furnace is producing glass that is charged with one or
more of the glass manufacturing metal HAP and also during all transition
phases from glass containing metal HAP to glass that does not contain
metal HAP (i.e., until all HAP-containing glass has left the furnace
melter).  The rule will require monitoring systems to measure the
appropriate parameter at least every 15 minutes, and the average value
will have to be recorded at least once every 8-hour shift.  For any new
affected furnace controlled with an ESP, the owner or operator will have
to install a continuous parameter monitoring system (CPMS) that
continuously measures and records the secondary voltage and electrical
current to each field of the ESP.  For any new affected furnace
controlled with a fabric filter, the owner or operator will have to
install a bag leak detection system.  Owners and operators of any
affected existing or new furnaces also will be required to conduct
annual inspections of furnace emission control devices and monitoring
systems.

The final Glass Manufacturing area source rule will require affected
facilities to submit an Initial Notification and a Notice of Compliance
Status.  Affected facilities also will be required to keep records of
glass production and control device and monitoring system operation and
maintenance activities, including annual inspections.

Under the final Secondary Nonferrous Metals area source rule, affected
sources will be required to install a capture system that collects the
particulate and fumes released at each crushing and screening operation
and duct those emissions to a particulate matter (PM) control device
that achieves a specified control efficiency or outlet PM concentration.
 Affected sources will also be required to install, operate, and
maintain one or more fabric filter/cartridge collector baghouses on each
furnace melting operation.

For a new or existing affected source with a crushing or screening
operation, the final rule will require a daily visual inspection,
including airflow verification, of the associated capture device.  For
an existing affected source with furnace melting operations, the final
rule will require a daily visible emissions check or a daily visual bag
inspection of each baghouse.  For a new affected source with furnace
melting operations, the final rule will require owners and operators to
install, operate, and maintain a bag leak detection system for each
baghouse used to comply with the standards.  Owners and operators of any
new affected source will also be required to conduct a daily check of
each bag leak detection system.  The final rule will also require
affected facilities to submit initial notifications of applicability and
compliance status.  Existing and new sources will also be subject to
requirements in the General Provisions (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A), as
specifically noted.  

The information collection requirements for existing and new sources in
the Clay Ceramics Manufacturing, Glass Manufacturing, and Secondary
Nonferrous Metals Processing source categories are listed in Attachments
1A, 1B, and 1C.

2.  Need For and Use of the Collection

(a)	Need/Authority for the Collection.

	Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires EPA to establish NESHAP
for both major and area sources of HAP that are listed for regulation
under CAA section 112(c).  An area source is a stationary source that is
not a major source (i.e., an area source does not emit and does not have
the potential to emit more than 10 tpy of any single HAP and more than
25 tpy of any combination of HAP).  Requirements for area sources in CAA
sections 112(c)(3) and 112(k) direct EPA to (1) identify at least 30 air
toxics that present the greatest potential health threat in the largest
number of urban areas and (2) to identify sufficient area source
categories to ensure that sources representing 90 percent or more of the
of the emissions of the 30 “listed” HAP are subject to regulation. 
EPA implements these requirements through the Integrated Urban Air
Toxics Strategy (64 FR 38715, July 19, 1999).  EPA added Glass
Manufacturing and Secondary Nonferrous Metals to the Integrated Urban
Air Toxics Strategy area source category list on June 26, 2002 (67 FR
43112) and added Clay Products Manufacturing on November 22, 2002 (67 FR
70428).  The Clay Products Manufacturing area source category was later
split into the two categories of Brick and Structural Clay Products
(BSCP) Manufacturing and Clay Ceramics Manufacturing to better match the
categories already scheduled to be regulated by major source NESHAP. 
The Clay Ceramics Manufacturing area source category is being addressed
in the area source rule currently being issued, while the BSCP
Manufacturing area source category will be addressed in a future action.
 The initial listing of the Clay Ceramics Manufacturing area source
category was based on emissions of chromium, manganese, nickel, and
lead, while the initial listing of the Glass Manufacturing area source
category was based on emissions of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead,
manganese, and nickel.  The initial listing of the Secondary Nonferrous
Metals Processing area source category was based on emissions of
arsenic, chromium, lead, manganese, mercury, and nickel.  Each of these
HAP metals is on the list of 30 HAP identified in the 1999 strategy.

Under  CAA section 112(d)(5), EPA may elect to promulgate HAP standards
for area sources based on the use of generally available control
technology (GACT) or management practices used by the sources.  EPA can
consider costs and economic impacts in determining GACT, which is
particularly important when developing regulations for source categories
that may have few establishments and many small businesses, or when
determining whether additional control is needed for sources that are
already well-controlled as a result of other air emissions standards.

	Certain records and reports are necessary for the Administrator to
confirm the compliance status of area sources, identify any new or
reconstructed sources subject to the standards, and confirm that the
standards are being achieved on a continuous basis.  These recordkeeping
and reporting requirements are specifically authorized by section 114 of
the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7414) and set out in the part 63 NESHAP
General Provisions.  The recordkeeping and reporting requirements for
title V permits are contained in 40 CFR 70.6 and 40 CFR 71.6.  Under
parts 63 and 70 or 71, the owner or operator must keep each record for 5
years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance,
corrective action, report, or record.    

 (b)	Use/Users of the Data.

	The information will be used by the delegated authority (State agency
or Regional Administrator if there is no delegated State agency) to
ensure that the standards and other requirements are being achieved. 
Based on review of the recorded information at the site and the reported
information, the delegated permitting authority can identify facilities
that may not be in compliance and decide which facilities, records, or
processes may need inspection.      

3.	Nonduplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria

(a)	Nonduplication.

A computer search of EPA’s ongoing ICRs revealed no duplication of
information-gathering efforts. 

 (b)  Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB.

	An announcement of a public comment period for this ICR was published
as part of the proposed rulemaking.  

(c)	Consultations.

The final rules were developed in consultation with individual
companies, State agencies, and trade associations.  The non-EPA persons
consulted on the information collection activities are identified in
Table 1.

TABLE 1.  PERSONS CONSULTED ON THE INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITIES

Contact	Applicable subpart	Organization	Telephone number

Greg Andrews	Subpart RRRRRR	R.T. Vanderbilt Co., Ceramic Manufacturers
of America (CerMA)	(203) 853-1400

Eric Astrachan 

Tile Council of North America (TCNA)	(864) 646-8453

Todd Barson 

Ferro Corp., CerMA	(216) 750-6432

Mike Cassidy

Kohler Co.	(920) 457-4441, ext. 77263

Bob Hurt

Dal-Tile Corp.	(214) 309-4891

Myra Warne 

Society of Glass and Ceramic Decorators, CerMA	(740) 588-9882

Steve Wiederwax

American Marazzi Tile, Inc.	(972) 226-0110

John Brown	Subpart SSSSSS

	Glass Manufacturing Industry Council (GMIC)	(614) 818-9423

Marshall Bullard

Automotive Components Holdings

	Joe Kane

Corning Inc.	(607) 974-9000

Kurt Kissling

Pepper Hamilton LLP	(313) 393-7313

Patricia Pride

PPG Industries, Inc.	(412) 492-5278

Phil Ross

Glass Packaging Institute (GPI)	(949) 493-7293

Pamela Rygalski

Pilkington NA	(910) 276-5630

Michael Turnbull 

Guardian Industries 	(248) 340-2227 

John Bullock	Subpart TTTTTT	International Precious Metals Institute
(203) 784-3181

Merideth Curren

Pease & Curren, Inc.	(401) 739-6350

Roger Fumey

Atlas Pacific Corporation	(909) 421-1200

Christopher Kiser

Magretech, Inc.	(216) 518-9165

James Mallory

Non-Ferrous Founders’ Society	(847) 299-0950

George Phillips

Sipi Metals Corp.	(773) 276-0070

Charles Tatakis

Metalor Technologies USA Refining Corp.	(508) 699-8800, ext. 224

(d)	Effects of Less Frequent Collection.

	If the relevant information were collected less frequently, the
delegated permitting authority (State or EPA) would not be reasonably
assured that a facility is in compliance with the standards.

(e)	General Guidelines. 

	None of the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.6 are being exceeded.

(f)	Confidentiality.

	All information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of
confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency
policies set forth in Title 40, Chapter 1, Part 2, Subpart
B--Confidentiality of Business Information (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902,
September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 39999, September 28, 1978; 43 FR
42251, September 28, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979).

(g)  Sensitive Questions.  

	This ICR does not involve matters of a sensitive nature.

4.	The Respondents and the Information Requested

(a)	Respondents/NAICS Codes.

Potential respondents under Subpart RRRRRR are owners or operators of
any existing or new clay ceramics manufacturing facility that is an area
source of HAP emissions.  The North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) codes for clay ceramics manufacturing are 327111, 327112,
and 327122.  There are an estimated 51 facilities subject to the NESHAP
for the Clay Ceramics Manufacturing area source category; no new clay
ceramics area sources are expected during the 3year period of this ICR.

Potential respondents under Subpart SSSSSS are owners or operators of
any existing or new glass manufacturing facility that is an area source
of HAP emissions.  The NAICS codes for glass manufacturing are 327211,
327212, and 327213.  There are an estimated 21 facilities subject to the
NESHAP for the Glass Manufacturing area source category; no new glass
area sources are expected to be affected sources during the 3year period
of this ICR.

Potential respondents under Subpart TTTTTT are owners or operators of
any existing or new secondary nonferrous metals processing facility that
is an area source of HAP emissions and emits arsenic, chromium, lead,
manganese, or nickel.  The NAICS code for secondary nonferrous metals
processing is 331492.  This area source category was originally
established under SIC code 3341, a broader classification which included
brass and bronze ingot makers.  The corresponding NAICS code for brass
and bronze ingot makers is 331423.  There are an estimated 10 facilities
subject to the NESHAP for the Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing
area source category; no new secondary nonferrous metals area sources
are expected during the 3-year period of this ICR. 

(b) Information Requested.

	(i)  Data Items, Including Recordkeeping Requirements.  Attachments
1A,1B, and 1C, Information Requirements, summarize the data items,
including recordkeeping and reporting requirements, for the Clay
Ceramics Manufacturing, Glass Manufacturing, and Secondary Nonferrous
Metals Processing area source categories.

	(ii)  Respondent Activities.  The respondent activities required by the
final Clay Ceramics Manufacturing, Glass Manufacturing, and Secondary
Nonferrous Metals Processing rules are identified in Tables 2A, 2B, and
2C and are introduced in section 6(a).

5.	The Information Collected–Agency Activities, Collection
Methodology, and Information Management

(a)	Agency Activities.

	The Agency activities associated with the final Clay Ceramics
Manufacturing, Glass Manufacturing, and Secondary Nonferrous Metals
Processing rules are provided in Tables 3A, 3B, and 3C and are
introduced in section 6(c).

(b)	Collection Methodology and Management.

	Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and
published for use in compliance and enforcement programs of the
delegated permitting authority.  The notifications of compliance status
and monitoring records required under the final rules are used for
problem identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance,
and for compliance determinations.  EPA is the permitting authority
until the State agency is delegated authority to implement the final
rules.  Therefore, information contained in the reports submitted to the
Regional Administrator will be entered into the Air Facility System
(AFS), which is operated and maintained by EPA’s Office of Compliance.
 AFS is EPA’s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval
of compliance data for approximately 125,000 industrial and
government-owned facilities.  EPA uses the AFS for tracking air
pollution compliance and enforcement by local and state regulatory
agencies, EPA regional offices and EPA headquarters.  EPA and its
delegated authorities can edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data.

(c)  Small Entity Flexibility.

	The Small Business Administration defines a small entity as a firm
having no more than 500 to 750 employees for Clay Ceramics
Manufacturing, less than 750 to 1,000 employees for Glass Manufacturing,
and less than 750 employees for Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing
depending on the size definition for the affected NAICS code.  There
will not be adverse impacts on any small entities in the Clay Ceramics
Manufacturing, Glass Manufacturing, and Secondary Nonferrous Metals
Processing area source categories.  The final Clay Ceramics
Manufacturing rule does not create any new requirements or burdens for
existing sources other than minimal notification requirements.  The
final Glass Manufacturing rule will require additional costs for
21 glass manufacturing facilities, but only three of those facilities
will be expected to install control devices and incur costs beyond those
associated with annual inspections of control devices; only one of these
facilities is a small business.  The final Secondary Nonferrous Metals
Processing rule does not create any new requirements or burdens for
existing sources other than minimal notification requirements.

(d)  Collection Schedule.

	The specific frequency for each information collection activity within
this request is shown in Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C for the Clay Ceramics
Manufacturing, Glass Manufacturing, and Secondary Nonferrous Metals
Processing area source categories.

6.   Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection

(a)  Estimating Respondent Burden.

	The annual burden estimates for the final Clay Ceramics NESHAP, Glass
Manufacturing NESHAP, and Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing NESHAP
are shown in Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C.  These numbers were derived from
estimates based on EPA’s experience with other standards.  No burden
estimates are provided for new area sources because no new facilities
are expected to become affected sources during the 3year period of this
ICR.

(b)  Estimating Respondent Costs.

	The information collection activities for the final Clay Ceramics
NESHAP, Glass Manufacturing NESHAP, and Secondary Nonferrous Metals
Processing NESHAP are presented in Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C.  Because the
data are already collected by respondents as required by the existing
permit requirements, no respondent development costs are associated with
the information collection activities.

(i)  Estimating Labor Costs.  Labor rates and associated costs are based
on Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data.  Technical, management, and
clerical average hourly rates for private industry workers were taken
from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
December 2005, “Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and
industry group” available at   HYPERLINK
"http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t02.htm" 
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t02.htm .  Wages for occupational
groups are used as the basis for the labor rates with a total
compensation of $41.89/hour for technical, $48.09/hour for managerial,
and $20.86/hour for clerical.  These rates represent salaries plus
fringe benefits and do not include the cost of overhead.  An overhead
rate of 110 percent is used to account for these costs.  The
fully-burdened hourly wage rates used to represent respondent labor
costs are:  technical at $87.98, management at $100.98, and clerical at
$43.80.

	(ii)  Estimating Capital and Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Costs. 
Although the final Clay Ceramics NESHAP includes requirements for
facilities to install and operate control devices, HVLP spray equipment,
and monitoring systems, it has been determined that existing clay
ceramics facilities are already in compliance with the requirements of
the final NESHAP.  Capital and O&M costs were not estimated for new
sources because no new sources are expected during the next 3-year
period.  Therefore, no (zero) capital and O&M costs are associated with
the final Clay Ceramics NESHAP during the 3-year period of this ICR.

	The capital costs associated with the information collection
requirements of the final Glass Manufacturing NESHAP will include the
costs to purchase and install monitoring systems, conduct performance
tests, and purchase file cabinets for keeping records.  Monitoring
systems will need to be installed on three existing furnaces that will
be subject to the rule and will require emission controls to meet the
emission limits.  We estimate that one of the new control systems will
be an ESP and will require systems to monitor secondary voltage and
electrical current to each field of the ESP.  We estimate that fabric
filters will be installed on the other two existing furnaces that will
need emission controls to meet the standard; for the fabric filters,
systems for monitoring inlet temperature will be required.  The final
rule will require a one-time performance test on each affected furnace. 
However, this requirement will be waived if the furnace had been tested
within the previous 5 years, and the test demonstrated compliance with
the emission limit in the final Glass Manufacturing Area Source NESHAP. 
We assumed that performance tests will be required only on the three
existing affected furnaces installing a control device.  The O&M costs
associated with the final Glass Manufacturing NESHAP include the costs
of conducting annual inspections of control systems on affected sources.
 It is assumed that there are a total of 27 affected sources at the 21
facilities subject to the final Glass Manufacturing NESHAP and that 13
of the 27 affected sources can meet the required emission limit without
a control device.  Therefore, it is assumed that these control device
inspections will be conducted on each of the remaining 14 affected
furnaces annually.

	Although the final Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing NESHAP
includes requirements for facilities to install and operate capture
devices, control devices, and monitoring systems, it has been determined
that existing secondary nonferrous metals facilities are already in
compliance with the requirements of the final NESHAP.  Capital and O&M
costs were not estimated for new sources because no new sources are
expected during the next 3-year period.  Therefore, no (zero) capital
and O&M costs are associated with the final Secondary Nonferrous Metals
Processing NESHAP during the 3-year period of this ICR.

	(iii)  Annualizing Capital Costs.  No capital costs are associated with
the final Clay Ceramics NESHAP or the final Secondary Nonferrous Metals
Processing NESHAP.  Therefore, no (zero) annualized capital costs are
associated with the final Clay Ceramics NESHAP or the final Secondary
Nonferrous Metals Processing NESHAP during the 3-year period of this
ICR.  For the final Glass Manufacturing NESHAP, the annualized capital
costs include the costs for monitoring systems, performance tests, and
file cabinets.

(c)  Estimating Agency Burden and Cost.

	Because the information collection requirements were developed as an
incidental part of standards development, no costs can be attributed to
the development of the information collection requirements.  Because
reporting and recordkeeping requirements on the part of the respondents
are required under the operating permits rules in 40 CFR part 70 or part
71 and the part 63 NESHAP General Provisions, no operational costs will
be incurred by the Federal Government.  Publication and distribution of
the information are part of the Compliance Data System, with the result
that no Federal costs can be directly attributed to the ICR. 
Examination of records to be maintained by the respondents will occur
incidentally as part of the periodic inspection of sources that is part
of EPA’s overall compliance and enforcement program, and, therefore,
is not attributable to the ICR.  The only costs that the Federal
government will incur are user costs associated with the analysis of the
reported information, as presented in Tables 3A, 3B, and 3C for Clay
Ceramics Manufacturing, Glass Manufacturing, and Secondary Nonferrous
Metals Processing.

	The Agency labor rates are from the Office of Personnel Management
(OPM) 2006 General Schedule which excludes locality rates of pay.  These
rates can be obtained from Salary Table 2006-GS available on the OPM
website,   HYPERLINK "http://www.opm.gov/oca/06tables/html/gs_h.asp" 
http://www.opm.gov/oca/06tables/html/gs_h.asp . The government employee
labor rates are $14.35/hour for clerical (GS-6, Step 3), $26.53 for
technical (GS-12, Step 1), and $35.75/hr for management (GS-13, Step 5).
 These rates were increased by 60 percent to include fringe benefits and
overhead.  The fully-burdened wage rates used to represent Agency labor
costs are:  clerical at $22.96; technical at $42.45, and management at
$57.20.

(d) 	Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs.

There are an estimated 51 existing facilities subject to the Clay
Ceramics Manufacturing area source NESHAP.  No new sources are expected
during the next 3 years.  Consequently, the average number of Clay
Ceramics respondents during the 3-year period of this ICR is 17.  There
are an estimated 21 existing glass manufacturing area source facilities
that will be subject to the final rule, and none of the new glass
manufacturing facilities expected to begin operations during the next 3
years are expected to be subject to the rule.  Therefore, the average
number of Glass Manufacturing respondents during the 3-year period of
this ICR is 7.  There are an estimated 10 existing facilities subject to
the Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing area source NESHAP.  No new
sources are expected during the next 3 years.  Consequently, the average
number of Secondary Nonferrous Metals respondents during the 3-year
period is 3.

The only components of the total annual responses attributable to this
ICR for the Clay Ceramics NESHAP and the Secondary Nonferrous Metals
Processing NESHAP are one-time initial notifications of applicability
and compliance status for each existing facility.  For the final Glass
Manufacturing NESHAP, the components of the total annual responses
attributable to this ICR are one-time initial notifications and one-time
notifications of compliance status for the 21 facilities that will be
subject to the rule.

The number of total annual responses for subpart RRRRRR is estimated as:
 34 (17 annual average respondents × 2 notifications).  The number of
total annual responses for subpart SSSSSS is estimated as:  14 (7 annual
average respondents × 2 notifications).  The number of total annual
responses for subpart TTTTTT is estimated as:  6 (3 annual average
respondents × 2 notifications). 

 (e)	Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables.

	(i)  Respondent tally.  The bottom line respondent burden hours and
costs, presented in Tables 2A, 2B, and 2C are calculated by adding
person-hours per year down each column for technical, managerial, and
clerical staff, and by adding down the cost column.

The average annual burden for the monitoring, recordkeeping, and
reporting requirements in subpart RRRRRR for the 51 existing facilities
subject to the Clay Ceramics Manufacturing area source NESHAP is 196
person-hours, with an annual average cost of $16,560 and no capital and
O&M costs.

The average annual burden for the monitoring, recordkeeping, and
reporting requirements in subpart SSSSSS for the 21 existing glass
manufacturing area sources is 190 person-hours, with an annual average
cost of $16,126 and annualized capital and O&M costs of $12,964.

The average annual burden for the monitoring, recordkeeping, and
reporting requirements in part TTTTTT for the 10 existing facilities
subject to the Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing area source NESHAP
is 15 person-hours, with an annual average cost of $1,299 and no capital
and O&M costs.

The total annual burden for the three source categories is 401 hours at
$33,985, with annualized capital and O&M costs of $12,964.

	(ii)  The Agency tally.  The average annual Federal Government cost is
$4,856 for 117 hours for subpart RRRRRR, $3,261 for 67 hours for
subpart SSSSSS, and $318 for 7 hours for subpart TTTTTT.  The total
annual Federal Government cost associated with the three final rules is
$8,435 for 191 total annual hours.  The bottom line Agency burden hours
and costs presented in Tables 3A, 3B, and 3C for the three final rules
are calculated by adding person-hours per year down each column for
technical, managerial, and clerical staff, and by adding down the cost
column. 

	(iii)  Variations in the annual bottom line.  This section does not
apply since no significant variation is anticipated.

(f)	Reasons for Change in Burden.

	This section does not apply because this is a new ICR.

 (g)  Burden Statement

	The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this
collection of information is estimated to average 6 hours per response
for the NESHAP for clay ceramics manufacturing area sources, 14 hours
per response for the NESHAP for glass manufacturing area sources, and 3
hours per response for the NESHAP for secondary nonferrous metals
processing area sources.

Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by
persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide
information to or for a Federal agency.  This includes the time needed
to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and
verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and
disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply
with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.

	An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number.  The OMB control numbers for EPA’s
regulations in 40 CFR part 63 are listed in 40 CFR part 9.

	To comment on the Agency’s need for this information the accuracy of
the provided burden estimates, and any suggestions for minimizing
respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection
techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under
Docket ID Nos. EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0424 (Clay Ceramics),
EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0360 (Glass), and EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0940 (Secondary
Nonferrous Metals) which are available for online viewing at   HYPERLINK
"http://www.regulations.gov"  http://www.regulations.gov , or in person
viewing at the Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center in the
EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.,
NW, Washington, DC.  The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays.  The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566-1744,
and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-1742.  An
electronic version of the public docket is available at   HYPERLINK
"http://www.regulations.gov."  http://www.regulations.gov.   This site
can be used to submit or view public comments, access the index listing
of the contents of the public docket, and to access those documents in
the public docket that are available electronically.  When in the
system, select “search,” then key in one of the Docket ID Numbers
identified above.  Also, you can send comments to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725
17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention Desk Officer for EPA. 
Please include the relevant EPA Docket ID Number (EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0424,
EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0360, or EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0940) and OMB Control Number
2060-NEW in any correspondence.

PART B

	This section is not applicable because statistical methods are not used
in data collection associated with the final rules.TABLE 2A.  ANNUAL
RESPONDENT BURDEN AND COST--NESHAP FOR CLAY CERAMICS MANUFACTURING AREA
SOURCES

Burden item	(A) Person-hours per occurrence	(B)  No. of occurrences per
respondent	(C) Person-hours per respondent (C=A*B)	(D) Respondents per
yeara	(E) Technical person-hours per year (E=C*D)	(F) Management
person-hours per year

 (E*0.05)	(G) Clerical person-hours per year (E*0.1)	(H) Costb, $ 

1.  Applications	N/A

	2.  Surveys and Studies	N/A

	3.  Acquisition, Installation, and Utilization of Technology 

     and Systems	N/A

	4.  Reporting Requirements

A.  Read instructions	4	1	4	17	68	3.4	6.8	$6,624

B.  Required activities

     Initial notification of applicability	2	1	2	17	34	1.7	3.4	$3,312

     Notification of compliance status	4	1	4	17	68	3.4	6.8	$6,624

C.  Create information	See 4B

	D.  Gather existing information	See 4B

	E.  Write report	See 4B

	5.  Recordkeeping Requirements 

A.  Read instructions	See 4A

	B.  Plan activities	See 4A

	C.  Implement activities	See 4A

	D.  Record datac	N/A

	E.  Time to transmit or disclose informationc	N/A

	F.  Time to train personnelc	N/A

	G.  Time for auditsc	N/A

	TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST

196 hours	$16,560

N/A = not applicable.

a There are an estimated 51 existing clay ceramics facilities subject to
the area source NESHAP.  No new sources are projected during the 3-year
term of this ICR.  Therefore, the average number of respondents per year
is 17 (51÷3=17).

b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $100.98 for managerial labor,
$87.98 for technical labor, and $43.80 for clerical labor.  These rates
are from the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
December 2005, Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry
group.  The rates are from column 1, Total compensation.  The rates have
been increased by 110% to account for the benefit packages available to
those employed by private industry.

c No hours or costs are associated with this item because the rule
imposes no additional burden for this item. 

TABLE 2B.  ANNUAL RESPONDENT BURDEN AND COST--NESHAP FOR GLASS
MANUFACTURING AREA SOURCES

Burden item	(A) Person-hours per occurrence	(B)  No. of occurrences per
respondent	(C) Person-hours per respondent (C=A*B)	(D) Respondents per
year	(E) Technical person-hours per year (E=C*D)	(F) Management
person-hours per year

 (E*0.05)	(G) Clerical person-hours per year (E*0.1)	(H) Cost, $a 

1.  Applications	N/A

	2.  Surveys and Studies	N/A

	3.  Acquis., Install., and Util. of Technology  and Systems	N/A

	4.  Reporting Requirements

A.  Read instructionsb	2	1	2.0	7.0	14.0	0.7	1.4	$1,364

B.  Required activities

     Initial notification of applicabilityc	2	1	2.0	7.0	14.0	0.7	1.4
$1,364

     Notification of compliance statusd	4	1	4.0	7.0	28.0	1.4	2.8	$2,727

C.  Create information	See 4B

	D.  Gather existing information	See 4B

	E.  Write report	See 4B

	5.  Recordkeeping Requirements 

A.  Read instructionse	2	1	2.0	7.0	14.0	0.7	1.4	$1,364

B.  Plan activities	See 5E

	C.  Implement activities	See 5E

	D.  Record dataf	0.1	1,095	109.5	0	0	0	0	$0

E.  Time to transmit or disclose informationg	0.25	3.3	0.8	14.0	11.6	0.6
1.2	$1,125

F.  Time to train personnelh	12	1	12.0	7.0	84.0	4.2	8.4	$8,182

G.  Time for audits	N/A

	TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST

190 hours	$16,126

TOTAL NUMBER OF ANNUAL RESPONSESi	14

	ANNUAL CAPITAL COSTS

      Performance testsj

$8,740

      Monitoring equipmentk

$5,603

      File cabinetsl

$1,645

      Total annual capital

$15,988

ANNUALIZED CAPITAL COSTSm

      Performance tests (5 yr life, 7% interest; CRF =0.2439)

$2,130

      Monitoring equipment (10 yr life, 7% interest; CRF =0.1424)

$800

      File cabinets (15 yr life, 7% interest; CRF =0.1098)

$180

      Total annualized capital

$3,110

TOTAL ANNUAL COSTS (O&M)n

$9,854

TOTAL ANNUALIZED COSTS (Annualized capital + O&M costs)

$12,964

N/A = not applicable.

a  This ICR uses the following labor rates: $100.98 for managerial
labor, $87.98 for technical labor, and $43.80 for clerical labor.  These
rates are from the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
December 2005, Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry
group.  The rates are from column 1, Total compensation.  The rates have
been increased by 110% to account for the benefit packages available to
those employed by private industry.

b  There are an estimated 21 existing glass manufacturing facilities
that use HAP metals and no new facilities are expected; the average
number expected to read the rule during the 3-yr ICR clearance period is
21/3 = 7.

c  Each of the 21 existing noted above would be required to submit an
Initial Notification.

d  The estimated 21 existing plants that use HAP compounds as raw
materials and would be required to submit Notifications of Compliance
Status, for an average of 21/3 = 7 per year for the 3-yr ICR compliance
period.

e  The estimated 21 existing plants would be required to keep records of
the notifications and other records, or an average of 21/3 = 7 per year
during the 3-yr ICR compliance period.

f  It is assumed that 13 of the 27 affected furnaces can meet the
emission limit without installation of a control device.  It is assumed
that each of the remaining 14 affected furnaces have automatic
monitoring and recording systems.

g  Transmittals will include Initial Notifications for 21 plants and
Notifications of Compliance Status for 21 plants, for an average of
(21+21)/3 = 14 for each year of the 3-yr ICR clearance period.

h  Training will be required for one person at each of the 21 affected
plants or an average of 21/3=7 per year over the 3-yr clearance period.

i  The total annual number of responses is calculated by summing the
product of columns B and D for each of the reports listed in 4E.

j  Assumes emission tests will be conducted on 3 furnace control systems
or 3/3 = 1.0 affected sources per year using Method 5 at an average cost
of $8,740 per test.

k  Monitoring equipment will be needed for the 3 new emission control
systems:  1 system for monitoring ESP voltage and current at $9,570 per
system, and 2 systems for monitoring fabric filter inlet temperature at
$3,620 per system; an average of 1 system will be installed per year
during the 3-yr ICR clearance period.

l  Assumes one standard four-drawer file cabinet for each of the 21
facilities, or an average of 21/3=7 per year required to maintain
records at a cost of $235 per cabinet.

m  Annualized costs are calculated by multiplying the capital recovery
factor (CRF) by the capital cost.  CRF=(i)*(1+i)^t/((1+i)^t-1) where i =
interest rate (%) and t = equipment life (years).

n  Costs of annual inspections of emission control systems, assuming 8
hr per inspection for each of the 14 affected furnaces with a control
device.

	TABLE 2C.  ANNUAL RESPONDENT BURDEN AND COST--NESHAP FOR SECONDARY
NONFERROUS METALS PROCESSING 	AREA SOURCES

Burden item	(A) Person-hours per occurrence	(B)  No. of occurrences per
respondent	(C) Person-hours per respondent (C=A*B)	(D) Respondents per
yeara	(E) Technical person-hours per year (E=C*D)	(F) Management
person-hours per year

 (E*0.05)	(G) Clerical person-hours per year (E*0.1)	(H) Costb, $ 

1.  Applications	N/A

	2.  Surveys and Studies	N/A

	3.  Acquisition, Installation, and Utilization of Technology 

     and Systems	N/A

	4.  Reporting Requirements

A.  Read instructions	2	1	2	3	7	0.3	0.7	$649

B.  Required activities

     Initial notification of applicability	1	1	1	3	3	0.2	0.3	$325

     Notification of compliance status	1	1	1	3	3	0.2	0.3	$325

C.  Create information	See 4B

	D.  Gather existing information	See 4B

	E.  Write report	See 4B

	5.  Recordkeeping Requirements 

A.  Read instructions	See 4A

	B.  Plan activities	See 4A

	C.  Implement activities	See 4A

	D.  Record datac	N/A

	E.  Time to transmit or disclose informationc	N/A

	F.  Time to train personnelc	N/A

	G.  Time for auditsc	N/A

	TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST

15 hours	$1,299

N/A = not applicable.

a There are an estimated 10 existing secondary nonferrous metals
processing facilities subject to the area source NESHAP.  No new sources
are projected during the 3-year term of this ICR.  Therefore, the
average number of respondents per year is 3 (10÷3=3).

b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $100.98 for managerial labor,
$87.98 for technical labor, and $43.80 for clerical labor.  These rates
are from the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
December 2005, Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry
group.  The rates are from column 1, Total compensation.  The rates have
been increased by 110% to account for the benefit packages available to
those employed by private industry.

c No hours or costs are associated with this item because the rule
imposes no additional burden for this item. 

TABLE 3A.  ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST TO THE AGENCY--NESHAP FOR CLAY
CERAMICS MANUFACTURING AREA SOURCES

Burden item	(A) Person-hours per occurrence	(B) Occurrences per
respondent	(C) Facilities per year a	(D) Technical person-hours/year
(D=A*B*C)	(E) Management   person-hours/year (E=0.05*D)	(F) Clerical
person-hours/year (F=0.1*D)	 (G) Costb, $

Report Review:

	  Initial notification of applicability	2	1	17	34	1.7	3.4	$1,619

  Notification of compliance status	4	1	17	68	3.4	6.8	$3,237

TOTAL BURDEN AND COST

117 hours 	$4,856

a  There are an estimated 51 existing clay ceramics manufacturing
facilities subject to the area source NESHAP.  No new sources are
projected during the 3-year term of this ICR.  Therefore, the average
number of respondents per year is 17 (51÷3=17).  No travel is expected.

b  This ICR uses the following average hourly labor rates: $57.20 for
managerial (GS-13, Step 5, $35.75 x 1.6), $42.45 (GS-12, Step 1, $26.53
x 1.6) for technical and $22.96 (GS-6, Step 3, $14.35 x 1.6) for
clerical.  These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
2006 General Schedule, which excludes locality rates of pay.

TABLE 3B.  ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST TO THE AGENCY--NESHAP FOR GLASS
MANUFACTURING AREA SOURCES 

Burden item	(A) Person-hours per occurrence	(B) Occurrences per
respondent	(C) EPA person-hours/year (C=A*B)	(D) Facilities per year	(E)
Technical person-hours/year (E=C*D)	(F) Management   person-hours/year
(F=0.05*E)	(G) Clerical person-hours/year (G=0.1*E)	(H) Costa, $

Attend performance testb	16	1	16.0	1.0	16.0	0.8	1.6	$762

Report Review:

  Initial notification of applicabilityc	2	1	2.0	7.0	14.0	0.7	1.4	$666

  Notification of performance testd

  Notification of compliance statuse	4	1	4.0	7.0	28.0	1.4	2.8	$1,333

TOTAL BURDEN AND COST (SALARY)

	58.0	2.9	5.8	$2,761

Travel expenses for tests attendedf

$500

TOTAL BURDEN AND COST

67 hours	$3,261

a  This ICR uses the following average hourly labor rates: $57.20 for
managerial (GS-13, Step 5, $35.75 x 1.6), $42.45 (GS-12, Step 1, $26.53
x 1.6) for technical and $22.96 (GS-6, Step 3, $14.35 x 1.6) for
clerical.  These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
2006 General Schedule, which excludes locality rates of pay.

b  Assumes Agency personnel will attend the performance test for one
affected source per year.

c  Assumes 21 existing and no new plants will complete Initial
Notifications for an average of 21/3 = 7 per year during each year of
the 3-yr ICR clearance period.

d  Not required

e  Assumes 21 existing facilities will submit Notifications of
Compliance Status for an average of 21/3 = 7 per year of the 3-yr ICR
clearance period.

f  Assumes Agency personnel (1 person) will spend 2 days per plant, at
$50 per diem per day, and $400 transportation expense per round trip to
attend performance tests.

	TABLE 3C.  ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST TO THE AGENCY--NESHAP FOR SECONDARY
NONFERROUS METALS PROCESSING 	AREA SOURCES

Burden item	(A) Person-hours per occurrence	(B) Occurrences per
respondent	(C) Facilities per year a	(D) Technical person-hours/year
(D=A*B*C)	(E) Management   person-hours/year (E=0.05*D)	(F) Clerical
person-hours/year (F=0.1*D)	 (G) Costb, $

Report Review:

	  Initial notification of applicability	1	1	3	3	0.2	0.3	$159

  Notification of compliance status	1	1	3	3	0.2	0.3	$159

TOTAL BURDEN AND COST

7 hours 	$318

a  There are an estimated 10 existing secondary nonferrous metals
processing facilities subject to the area source NESHAP.  No new sources
are projected during the 3-year term of this ICR.  Therefore, the
average number of respondents per year is 3 (10÷3=3).  No travel is
expected.

b  This ICR uses the following average hourly labor rates: $57.20 for
managerial (GS-13, Step 5, $35.75 x 1.6), $42.45 (GS-12, Step 1, $26.53
x 1.6) for technical and $22.96 (GS-6, Step 3, $14.35 x 1.6) for
clerical.  These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
2006 General Schedule, which excludes locality rates of pay.

ATTACHMENT 1A.  INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS--NESHAP FOR CLAY CERAMICS
MANUFACTURING AREA SOURCES

Requirement	Citation for existing sources	Citation for new sources
General Provisions citation

Monitoring

	Kiln peak temperature	§63.11440(a)	§63.11440(a)	NA

APCD parameter check	NA	§63.11440(b)(1)	NA

Visible emissions test	NA	§63.11440(b)(2)	NA

APCD inspection	§63.11440(c)(1)	NA	NA

Alternative monitoring technique	Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR /
§63.11440(c)(2)	Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR / §63.11440(b)(3)	40 CFR
63.8(f)

Notifications

	Notification of applicability	Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR / §63.11442(a)
Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR / §63.11442(a)	40 CFR 63.9(a)(2)

Notification of construction/reconstruction 	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.9(b)(5)

Notification of special compliance requirements 	Table 1 to subpart
RRRRRR	Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR	40 CFR 63.9(d)

Notification of performance test	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.9(e)

Notification of opacity/VE observations	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.9(f)

Additional CMS notifications	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.9(g)

Notification of compliance status	Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR /
§63.11442(b)	Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR / §63.11442(b)	40 CFR 63.9(h)

Notification of changes in information	Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR	Table 1
to subpart RRRRRR	40 CFR 63.9(j)

Plans

	SSM plan	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.6(e)(3)

Performance test plan	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.7(c)(2)

CMS quality control plan	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.8(d)

CMS performance evaluation test plan	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.8(e)(3)

Records

	Records of notifications	Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR / 63.11443(a)(1)
Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR / 63.11443(a)(1)	40 CFR 63.10

Monitoring/inspection information	Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR /
63.11443(a)(2)	Table 1 to subpart RRRRRR / 63.11443(a)(2)	40 CFR 63.10

Reports

	Reports of deviation	NA	NA	NA

Semiannual monitoring reports	NA	NA	NA

Initial/repeat performance tests 	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.7(e)(1) /

40 CFR 63.6(h)(7)

Quality assurance test plan	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.7(c)

CMS performance evaluation/report	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.8(e)(5)

SSM reports	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.6(e)(3)

Excess emissions reports	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.10(e)(3)

ATTACHMENT 1B.  INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS--NESHAP FOR GLASS
MANUFACTURING AREA SOURCES 

Requirement	Citation for existing sources	Citation for new sources	Part
63 General Provisions citation

Monitoring

	Furnace ESP secondary voltage and current	§63.11454(b)	§63.11454(d)
N/A

Furnace fabric filter inlet temperature	§63.11454(c)	§63.11454(e)	N/A

Notifications

	Notification of applicability	§63.11456(a)	§63.11456(a)	40 CFR
63.9(b)

Notification of construction/reconstruction 	N/A	N/A	40 CFR 63.9(b)(5)

Notification of special compliance requirements 	N/A	N/A	40 CFR 63.9(d)

Notification of performance test	N/A	N/A	40 CFR 63.9(e)

Notification of opacity/VE observations	N/A	N/A	40 CFR 63.9(f)

Additional CMS notifications	N/A	N/A	40 CFR 63.9(g)

Notification of compliance status	§63.11456(b)	§63.11456(b)	40 CFR
63.9(h)

Notification of changes in information	N/A	N/A	40 CFR 63.9(j)

Plans

	SSM plan	N/A	N/A	40 CFR 63.6(e)(3)

Performance test plan	N/A	N/A	40 CFR 63.7(c)(2)

CMS quality control plan	N/A	N/A	40 CFR 63.8(d)

CMS performance evaluation test plan	N/A	N/A	40 CFR 63.8(e)(3)

Records

	Records of notifications	§63.11457(a)(1)	§63.11457(a)(1)	40 CFR 63.10

Records of startups, shutdowns and malfunctions	N/A	N/A	40 CFR 63.10

Records that demonstrate continuous compliance	§63.11457(a)(3)
§63.11457(a)(3)	40 CFR 63.10

Records of glass production	§63.11457(a)(4)	§63.11457(a)(4)	40 CFR
63.10

Monitoring/inspection information	§63.11457(a)(5) - (8), §63.11457(c)
§63.11457(a)(5) - (8), §63.11457(c)	40 CFR 63.10

Reports

	Reports of deviation	N/A	N/A	N/A

Semiannual monitoring reports	N/A	N/A	N/A

Initial/repeat performance tests 	N/A	N/A	40 CFR 63.7(e)(1) /

40 CFR 63.6(h)(7)

Quality assurance test plan	N/A	N/A	40 CFR 63.7(c)

CMS performance evaluation/report	N/A	N/A	40 CFR 63.8(e)(5)

SSM reports	N/A	N/A	40 CFR 63.6(e)(3)

Excess emissions reports	N/A	N/A	40 CFR 63.10(e)(3)

ATTACHMENT 1C.  INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS--NESHAP FOR SECONDARY
NONFERROUS METALS PROCESSING AREA SOURCES

Requirement	Citation for existing sources	Citation for new sources
General Provisions citation

Monitoring

	Visual inspection of capture device	§63.11466(a)	§63.11466(a) 	NA

Visible emissions check 	§63.11466(b)	NA	NA

Visual bag inspection	§63.11466(b) 	NA	NA

Bag leak detection system	NA	§63.11466(c)	NA

Notifications

	Notification of applicability	Table 1 to subpart TTTTTT / §63.11469(a)
Table 1 to subpart TTTTTT / §63.11469(a)	40 CFR 63.9(a)(2)

Notification of construction/reconstruction 	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.9(b)(5)

Notification of special compliance requirements 	Table 1 to subpart
TTTTTT	Table 1 to subpart TTTTTT	40 CFR 63.9(d)

Notification of performance test	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.9(e)

Notification of opacity/VE observations	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.9(f)

Additional CMS notifications	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.9(g)

Notification of compliance status	Table 1 to subpart TTTTTT /
§63.11469(b)	Table 1 to subpart TTTTTT / §63.11469(b)	40 CFR 63.9(h)

Notification of changes in information	Table 1 to subpart TTTTTT	Table 1
to subpart TTTTTT	40 CFR 63.9(j)

Plans

	SSM plan	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.6(e)(3)

Performance test plan	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.7(c)(2)

CMS quality control plan	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.8(d)

CMS performance evaluation test plan	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.8(e)(3)

Records

	Records of notifications	Table 1 to subpart TTTTTT / §63.11470(a)(1)
Table 1 to subpart TTTTTT / §63.11470(a)(1)	40 CFR 63.10

Monitoring/inspection information	Table 1 to subpart TTTTTT /
§63.11470(a)(2)	Table 1 to subpart TTTTTT / §63.11470(a)(2)	40 CFR
63.10

Reports

	Reports of deviation	NA	NA	NA

Semiannual monitoring reports	NA	NA	NA

Initial/repeat performance tests 	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.7(e)(1) /

40 CFR 63.6(h)(7)

Quality assurance test plan	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.7(c)

CMS performance evaluation/report	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.8(e)(5)

SSM reports	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.6(e)(3)

Excess emissions reports	NA	NA	40 CFR 63.10(e)(3)

 

 PAGE   

 PAGE  1 

  PAGE  17 

  PAGE   28