Document ID: EPA-R09-OAR-2020-0088-0089
Agency: epa
Document Type: Rule
Title: Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Approvals and Promulgations: California; Technical Amendments
Posted Date: 2020-07-15T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 136 (Wednesday, July 15, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42728-42731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-13997]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2020-0088; FRL-10011-00-Region 9]

Air Plan Revisions; California; Technical Amendments

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final 
action to delete various local rules from the California State 
Implementation Plan (SIP) that were approved in error. These rules 
include general nuisance provisions, Federal New Source Performance 
Standards or National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant 
requirements, hearing board procedures, variance provisions, and local 
fee provisions. The EPA has determined that the continued presence of 
these rules in the SIP is potentially confusing and thus problematic 
for affected sources, the State, local agencies, and the EPA. The 
intended effect is to delete these rules to make the SIP consistent 
with the Clean Air Act. The EPA is also taking final action to make 
certain other corrections to address errors made in previous actions 
taken by the EPA on California SIP revisions are finalized.

DATES: This rule will be effective on August 14, 2020.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under 
Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2020-0088. All documents in the docket are 
listed on the http://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in 
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., 
Confidential Business information or other information whose disclosure 
is restricted by statute. Certain other materials, such as copyrighted 
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available 
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are 
available through http://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the 
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for 
additional availability information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Gong, Rules Office, EPA Region 
IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, (415) 972-3073, 
gong.kevin@epa.gov.

[[Page 42729]]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and 
``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Proposed Action

    On April 22, 2020 (85 FR 22384), pursuant to section 110(k)(6) of 
the Clean Air Act (CAA or ``Act''), the EPA proposed to delete various 
local rules from the California State Implementation Plan (SIP) that 
were approved in error. These rules include general nuisance 
provisions, Federal New Source Performance Standards or National 
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant requirements, hearing 
board procedures, variance provisions, and local fee provisions. The 
EPA proposed to delete the rules based on the Agency's determination 
that the rules were approved in error and that the continued presence 
of these rules in the SIP is potentially confusing and thus problematic 
for affected sources, the State, local agencies, and the EPA. Table 1 
in the proposed rule lists the specific rules that were proposed for 
deletion.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See 85 FR 22384, at 22385-22387.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In our April 22, 2020 proposed rule, the EPA also proposed to make 
certain other corrections to address errors made in previous actions 
taken by the EPA on California SIP revisions.\2\ One such correction 
includes the reinstatement in the applicable SIP of the following rules 
that were previously incorporated by reference but that were 
erroneously deleted: San Diego County APCD Rule 67.0 ``Architectural 
Coatings'' (adopted on December 4, 1990 and submitted to the EPA on May 
13, 1991), and Tuolumne County APCD Rule 516 ``Upset and Breakdown 
Conditions'' (excluding paragraph (C) (adopted on September 8, 1981 and 
submitted to the EPA on October 23, 1981). Other types of corrections 
include deletion of rules that were previously deleted but for which 
the deletion was not codified, and other revisions to address errors in 
amendatory instructions and publishing errors and to clarify the 
documents that were previously approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See 85 FR 22384, at 22388-22391.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In our proposed rule, we also proposed to codify the approval of 
(and incorporate by reference) the following rules that were previously 
approved but inadvertently not incorporated by reference: San Diego 
County APCD Rule 20.1 ``Definitions'' (submitted to the EPA on January 
28, 1981) and Yolo-Solano Rules 3.4.1 ``Standards for Granting 
Applications'' and 3.4.2 ``Conditional Approval'' (both submitted to 
the EPA on February 25, 1980). We are deferring the codification (and 
incorporation by reference) of San Diego County APCD Rule 20.1 and 
Yolo-Solano APCD Rules 3.4.1 and 3.4.2 due to the difficulties in 
preparing the hard copy documents that are necessary for transmittal to 
the Office of the Federal Register, for the purposes of incorporation 
by reference, while shelter-in-place orders remain in effect where 
Region IX offices and employees are located. We note that the versions 
of San Diego County APCD Rule 20.1 and Yolo-Solano APCD Rules 3.4.1 and 
3.4.2 discussed in this paragraph have been superseded by the EPA's 
approval of further amended rules,\3\ and thus, the San Diego rule and 
Yolo-Solano AQMD rules are no longer part of the current applicable SIP 
for their respective portions of the California SIP. We had proposed to 
codify their approvals to maintain an accurate accounting of the 
versions of the rules that applied for federal enforcement purposes at 
different times in the past.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Even if the EPA's approval of San Diego County APCD Rule 
20.1 (``Definitions''), as submitted on January 28, 1981, had been 
properly codified, it would have been superseded by the EPA's 
approval of Rule 20.1 (``New Source Review--General Provisions'') at 
83 FR 50007 (October 4, 2018). The same is true for Yolo-Solano 
AQMD's Rules 3.4.1 and 3.4.2. Yolo-Solano AQMD Rule 3.4.1 would have 
been superseded by the EPA's approval of Rule 3.1 (``General Permit 
Requirements''), sections 303.2 and 303.3, at 62 FR 36214 (July 7, 
1997). Yolo-Solano AQMD Rule 3.4.2 would have been superseded by 
approval of Rule 3.1 (``General Permit Requirements''), section 402, 
at 62 FR 36214 (July 7, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    An explanation of the relevant CAA requirements and the rationale 
for each of the proposed deletions and corrections were provided in the 
proposed rule and will not be restated here.

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    The public comment period for the EPA's proposed actions closed on 
May 22, 2020. The EPA did not receive any public comments.

III. EPA Action

    Under CAA section 110(k)(6), the EPA is taking final action to 
delete the rules listed in Table 1 of the April 22, 2020 proposed rule 
and any earlier versions of these rules from the corresponding air 
pollution control district portions of the California SIP. The EPA is 
taking this action based on our determination that the rules were 
previously approved into the applicable California SIP in error. We are 
also taking final action to make certain other corrections to fix 
errors in previous rulemakings on California SIP revisions as described 
in detail in the April 22, 2020 proposed rule and summarized above.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. This action merely 
corrects errors in previous rulemakings on SIP revisions and does not 
impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For 
that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 
2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under 
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority 
to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with 
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible

[[Page 42730]]

methods under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe 
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 
Indian country, this action does not have tribal implications and will 
not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt 
tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 
9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 14, 2020. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings 
to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen 
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: June 23, 2020.
John Busterud,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by:
0
a. Adding paragraphs (b)(2)(vii), (b)(3)(iii), and (b)(4)(iii);
0
b. Redesignating paragraph (b)(5)(i) as paragraph (c)(6)(xxiv)(D);
0
c. Adding paragraphs (b)(8)(ii), (b)(10)(iii), (b)(11)(iii), (b)(22) 
through (24), (c)(6)(i)(F), (c)(6)(iv)(D), (c)(6)(vii)(D), 
(c)(6)(ix)(C), (c)(6)(x)(D), (c)(6)(xii)(D), (c)(6)(xiii)(D), 
(c)(6)(xiv)(D), and (c)(6)(xviii)(B) and (C);
0
d. Revising paragraph (c)(6)(xxiii)(A);
0
e. Adding reserved paragraph (c)(6)(xxiii)(B) and paragraph 
(c)(6)(xxiv)(C);
0
f. Removing and reserving paragraphs (c)(21)(vii)(B);
0
g. Adding paragraph (c)(24)(iv)(D);
0
h. Removing and reserving paragraphs (c)(24)(x)(C), (D), and (E);
0
i. Adding paragraphs (c)(25)(i)(G), (c)(25)(iv)(C), (c)(28)(v)(B), and 
(c)(29)(ii)(C);
0
j. Removing and reserving paragraph (c)(29)(v)(B);
0
k. Adding paragraphs (c)(32)(iii)(H), (c)(44)(iv)(E), and 
(c)(52)(v)(D);
0
l. Redesignating paragraph (c)(52)(vi)(D) as paragraph (c)(52)(vii)(D);
0
m. Removing and reserving paragraphs (c)(52)(xix)(B) and (c)(54)(v)(C);
0
n. Adding paragraphs (c)(82) introductory text, (c)(83) introductory 
text, (c)(83)(i) introductory text, and (c)(83)(iii) introductory text;
0
o. Redesignating paragraph (c)(102)(ii)(B) as paragraph (c)(102)(i)(B);
0
p. Adding reserved paragraph (c)(102)(ii)(B);
0
q. Revising paragraph (c)(103)(xvii)(B);
0
r. Adding paragraphs (c)(103)(xvii)(E) and (c)(171)(i)(D)(7);
0
s. Revising paragraph (c)(172) introductory text;
0
t. Adding paragraphs (c)(176)(i)(A)(2), (c)(183)(i)(E) introductory 
text, and (c)(184)(i)(D)(1) and reserved paragraph (c)(184)(i)(D)(2);
0
u. Redesignating paragraph (c)(214)(i)(C)(3) as paragraph 
(c)(423)(i)(E)(7);
0
v. Adding paragraph (c)(241)(i)(C)(4);
0
w. Redesignating paragraph (c)(307)(i)(C)(3) as paragraph 
(c)(423)(i)(H)(1);
0
x. Adding reserved paragraph (c)(423)(i)(H)(2); and
0
y. Redesignating paragraph (c)(390)(i)(B)(1) as paragraph 
(c)(389)(i)(B)(5).
    The additions and revisions read as follows:

Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan--in part.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (vii) Previously approved on May 31, 1972 in paragraph (b) of this 
section and now deleted without replacement, Section 51.
    (3) * * *
    (iii) Previously approved on May 31, 1972 in paragraph (b) of this 
section and now deleted without replacement, Rule 4:4.
    (4) * * *
    (iii) Previously approved on May 31, 1972 in paragraph (b) of this 
section and now deleted without replacement, Rule 120.
* * * * *
    (8) * * *
    (ii) Previously approved on May 31, 1972 in paragraph (b) of this 
section and now deleted without replacement, Regulation VI.
* * * * *
    (10) * * *
    (iii) Previously approved on May 31, 1972 in paragraph (b) of this 
section and now deleted without replacement, Rule 4.2.
    (11) * * *
    (iii) Previously approved on May 31, 1972 in paragraph (b) of this 
section and now deleted without replacement, Rules 2.5 and 2.6.
* * * * *
    (22) Tulare County Air Pollution Control District.
    (i) Previously approved on May 31, 1972 in paragraph (b) of this 
section and now deleted without replacement, Sections 507, 508 and 515.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (23) San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District.
    (i) Previously approved on May 31, 1972 in paragraph (b) of this 
section and now deleted without replacement, Rule 111.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (24) Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District.
    (i) Previously approved on May 31, 1972 in paragraph (b) of this 
section and now deleted without replacement, Rule 17.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (c) * * *
    (6) * * *
    (i) * * *

[[Page 42731]]

    (F) Previously approved on September 22, 1972 in paragraph (c)(6) 
of this section and now deleted without replacement, Rule 51.
* * * * *
    (iv) * * *
    (D) Previously approved on September 22, 1972 in paragraph (c)(6) 
of this section and now deleted without replacement, Rules 418 and 419.
* * * * *
    (vii) * * *
    (D) Previously approved on September 22, 1972 in paragraph (c)(6) 
of this section and now deleted without replacement, Rules 419 and 420.
* * * * *
    (ix) * * *
    (C) Previously approved on September 22, 1972 in paragraph (c)(6) 
of this section and now deleted without replacement, Rules 418 and 419.
    (x) * * *
    (D) Previously approved on September 22, 1972 in paragraph (c)(6) 
of this section and now deleted without replacement, Rules 418 and 419.
* * * * *
    (xii) * * *
    (D) Previously approved on September 22, 1972 in paragraph (c)(6) 
of this section and now deleted without replacement, Rules 418 and 419.
    (xiii) * * *
    (D) Previously approved on September 22, 1972 in paragraph (c)(6) 
of this section and now deleted without replacement, Rule 419.
    (xiv) * * *
    (D) Previously approved on September 22, 1972 in paragraph (c)(6) 
of this section and now deleted without replacement, Rule 419.
* * * * *
    (xviii) * * *
    (B) Previously approved on September 22, 1972 in paragraph (c)(6) 
of this section and now deleted without replacement, Rule 45.
    (C) Previously approved on September 22, 1972 in paragraph (c)(6) 
of this section and now deleted without replacement, Rules 100, 101, 
and 102.
* * * * *
    (xxiii) * * *
    (A) Previously approved on September 22, 1972 in paragraph (c)(6) 
of this section and now deleted without replacement, Rule 2.17 and 
2.19.
* * * * *
    (xxiv) * * *
    (C) Previously approved on September 22, 1972 in paragraph (c)(6) 
of this section and now deleted without replacement, Rule 51.
* * * * *
    (24) * * *
    (iv) * * *
    (D) Previously approved on May 18, 1977 in paragraph (c)(24)(iv)(A) 
of this section and now deleted without replacement, Rules 418 and 505.
* * * * *
    (25) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (G) Previously approved on August 22, 1977 in paragraph 
(c)(25)(i)(A) of this section and now deleted without replacement, Rule 
111.
* * * * *
    (iv) * * *
    (C) Previously approved on August 22, 1977 in paragraph 
(c)(25)(iv)(A) of this section and now deleted without replacement, 
Rule 420.
* * * * *
    (28) * * *
    (v) * * *
    (B) Previously approved on August 22, 1977 in paragraph 
(c)(28)(v)(A) of this section and now deleted without replacement, Rule 
205.
* * * * *
    (29) * * *
    (ii) * * *
    (C) Previously approved on June 2, 1977 in paragraph (c)(29)(ii)(B) 
of this section and now deleted without replacement, Rules 112 and 113.
* * * * *
    (32) * * *
    (iii) * * *
    (H) Previously approved on June 14, 1978 in paragraph 
(c)(32)(iii)(C) of this section and now deleted without replacement, 
Rule 511.
* * * * *
    (44) * * *
    (iv) * * *
    (E) Previously approved on January 29, 1979 in paragraph 
(c)(44)(iv)(A) of this section and now deleted without replacement, 
Rule 5.1.
* * * * *
    (52) * * *
    (v) * * *
    (D) Previously approved on December 9, 1981 in paragraph 
(c)(52)(v)(B) of this section and now deleted without replacement, Rule 
511.
* * * * *
    (82) Revised regulations for the following APCD submitted on May 1, 
1980, by the Governor's designee.
* * * * *
    (83) Revised regulations for the following APCDs submitted on May 
13, 1980, by the Governor's designee.
    (i) Bay Area Air Quality Management District.
* * * * *
    (iii) Fresno County Air Pollution Control District.
* * * * *
    (103) * * *
    (xvii) * * *
    (B) Previously approved on May 27, 1982 in paragraph 
(c)(103)(xvii)(A) of this section and now deleted without replacement, 
Rule 516 (paragraph (C)).
* * * * *
    (E) Previously approved on May 27, 1982 in paragraph 
(c)(103)(xvii)(A) of this section and now deleted without replacement, 
Rules 703 and 710.
* * * * *
    (171) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (D) * * *
    (7) Previously approved on April 12, 1989 in paragraph 
(c)(171)(i)(D)(1) of this section and now deleted without replacement, 
Rule 4:2.
* * * * *
    (172) Revised regulations for the following APCD's were submitted 
on March 18, 1987, by the Governor's designee.
* * * * *
    (176) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (A) * * *
    (2) Previously approved on October 23, 1989 in paragraph 
(c)(176)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted without replacement, 
Rule 4.2-1.
* * * * *
    (183) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (E) Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District.
* * * * *
    (184) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (D) * * *
    (1) Rule 67.0, adopted on December 4, 1990.
* * * * *
    (241) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (C) * * *
    (4) Previously approved on July 21, 2000 in paragraph 
(c)(241)(i)(C)(2) of this section and now deleted without replacement, 
Rule 74.6.3.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-13997 Filed 7-14-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P