Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0225-0202
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2008-03-12T04:00Z

Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US

11/30/2007 09:07 AM

	

To

"Johansson, Robert" <Robert_C._Johansson@omb.eop.gov>

cc

Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Norm Possiel, Pat Dolwick

Subject

RE: Briefing materials for our meeting tomorrow at 3:00

Rob

Sorry for the confusion yesterday, it turns out we have more internal
work over the next few days to iron out some internal EPA questions
about our extrapolated cost approach.  Separately, we can plan to also
provide the week the modeling briefing which we have been talking about.
 I would prefer to wait to deliver materials until the day before, we
are still refining our materials and provide the clearest presentation
of the results.

I would still like to talk to you about the comparison of the costs and
benefits in the RIA as a follow-up to your conversation with Bryan.  My
calendar is wide open between 2 and 3:30, is there 15 minutes in there
that we could chat?

Ron

"Johansson, Robert" <Robert_C._Johansson@omb.eop.gov> 

11/28/2007 03:23 PM

	

To

Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Subject

RE: Briefing materials for our meeting tomorrow at 3:00

Sounds great --- although I would love an advanced copy of the lists

described below.

Any chance you could throw them together earlier for my consumption in a

--- less than polished manner; i.e., I don't need flashy, color, ppts

that you all are so good at putting together --- a simple excel

spreadsheet would be fine with me?

Rob 

-----Original Message-----

From: Evans.Ron@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Evans.Ron@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 3:15 PM

To: Johansson, Robert

Cc: King, Heidi R.; Cakir.Janet@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: RE: Briefing materials for our meeting tomorrow at 3:00

Wow, you must have been reading our minds.   I was going to propose at

our discussion tomorrow afternoon that we use the time on Thursday 12/6

to cover the results of the air quality modeling based on controls

designed to attain the 070 standard.  It also covers the very

information which you are asking for here.

How does that sound?

                                                                        

             "Johansson,                                                

             Robert"                                                    

             <Robert_C._Johan                                        To 

             sson@omb.eop.gov         Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron 

             >                        Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA            

                                                                     cc 

             11/28/2007 03:01         "King, Heidi R."                  

             PM                       <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>       

                                                                Subject 

                                      RE: Briefing materials for our    

                                      meeting tomorrow at 3:00          

                                                                        

                                                                        

                                                                        

                                                                        

                                                                        

                                                                        

Hi Janet and Ron,

Question:

As we have not yet set up a separate call to discuss the change in air

quality platforms between the draft RIA and final:

Can you provide a side by side map or list of the number of counties

that were forecast to be out of attainment in the base case using the

old platform and the new platform?

Can you provide a side by side map or list of the counties that cannot

make 0.070 in the "all known" controls partial attainment scenario under

the two platforms?

I seem to recall that you have provided that already, but can't track it

down.  To the extent that the above lists would include the degree to

which the counties are in nonattainment would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Rob