Document ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2002-0049-0306
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2003-03-19T05:00Z

­­­­­
Forwarded
by
Deborah
Nagle/
DC/
USEPA/
US
on
12/
30/
2002
05:
31
PM
­­­­­
"
Kimball,
Gary"
<
Gary.
Kimball@
state.
mn.
us>
12/
26/
2002
11:
23
AM
To:
Deborah
Nagle/
DC/
USEPA/
US@
EPA
Subject:
FW:
316(
b)
Help
needed
­­­
From
Deborah
Nagle
Deb,

Minnesota
would
answer
that
it
does
not
consider
entrainment
survival
(
answer
1).

­­­­­
Original
Message­­­­­
From:
Howe.
Peter@
epamail.
epa.
gov
[
mailto:
Howe.
Peter@
epamail.
epa.
gov]
Sent:
Tuesday,
December
17,
2002
1:
42
PM
To:
LBRIDGES@
DEM.
STATE.
IN.
US;
Mike.
McCullough@
epa.
state.
oh.
us;
Michael.
Wenholz@
dnr.
state.
wi.
us;
Bob.
Mosher@
epa.
state.
il.
us;
Gary.
Kimball@
state.
mn.
us
Cc:
Wall.
Tom@
epamail.
epa.
gov;
Nagle.
Deborah@
epamail.
epa.
gov
Subject:
316(
b)
Help
needed
­­­
From
Deborah
Nagle
Gentlemen,
would
you
please
answer
Deb's
questions
listed
in
her
E­
Mail
attached
below
related
to
316(
b)
entrainment
for
your
State
or
refer
it
to
those
in
your
State
agency
who
is
responsible
for
this
issue.
You
can
just
reply
to
this
message.
THANKS.

­­­­­
Forwarded
by
Peter
Howe/
R5/
USEPA/
US
on
12/
17/
02
01:
32
PM
­­­­­

316b
<
316b@
tetratech­
f
fx.
com>
Sent:
12/
16/
2002
04:
04
PM
To:
Bruce
Kent/
P2/
R8/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Caroline
Ejimofor/
R4/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Ericp
Nelson/
R1/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Evelyn
MacKnight/
R3/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Isaac
Chen/
R6/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
John
Dunn/
WWPD/
R7/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Karrie­
Jo
Shell/
R4/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Terry
Oda/
R9/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Larry
Merrill/
R3/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Mark
Stein/
R1/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Moses
Chang/
R2/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Paulette
Johnsey/
R6/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Peter
Howe/
R5/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Phil
Colarusso/
R1/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Philip
Sweeney/
R2/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Robyn
Stuber/
R9/
USEPA/
US@
EPA
cc:
Tom
Wall/
DC/
USEPA/
US@
EPA,
Deborah
Nagle/
DC/
USEPA/
US@
EPA
Subject:
316(
b)
Help
needed
­­­
From
Deborah
Nagle
I
need
some
help
from
the
field,
concerning
entrainment
survival.
We
have
been
reviewing
and
critiqueing
multiple
entrainment
survival
studies
for
the
316(
b)
Phase
II
NODA.
It
is
very
important
for
us
to
know
if
States
consider
entrainment
survival
when
making
316(
b)
determinations.
For
each
State
in
your
Region,
I
need
you
to
apply
one
of
the
answers
below:

ANSWERS
1.
Does
not
consider
entrainment
survival
at
all
2.
Assumes
entrainment
survival
is
0%
(
100%
mortality)
3.
Assumes
entrainment
survival
is
X%
(
fill
in
the
number
for
X)

I
need
this
information
quickly­­
this
week
if
possible.
Send
partial
information
instead
of
waiting
until
you
have
information
for
all
your
states.
Thanks
for
your
help.

­
Deborah