Document ID: SEC-2022-1368-0001
Agency: sec
Document Type: Notice
Title: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes: NYSE American, LLC
Posted Date: 2022-10-19T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 19, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63537-63541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-22663]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-96074; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2022-48]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend 
the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule

October 13, 2022.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given 
that, on October 12, 2022, NYSE American LLC (``NYSE American'' or the 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE American Options Fee 
Schedule (``Fee Schedule'') regarding certain incentive programs. The 
Exchange proposes to implement the fee change effective October 12, 
2022.\4\ The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and 
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Exchange originally filed to amend the Fee Schedule on 
September 30, 2022 (SR-NYSEAMER-2022-46) and withdrew such filing on 
October 12, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this filing is to modify the Fee Schedule regarding 
three incentive programs currently offered by the Exchange. 
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to modify (1) the qualifications 
for the Alternative Initiating Participant Rebate for Complex CUBE 
auctions, as set forth in Section I.G. (the ``Complex CUBE Rebate''), 
(2) the qualifications for the credit on Customer Electronic Simple and 
Complex executions set forth in Section I.H. (the ``Customer Credit''), 
and (3) the amount of the Initiating Participant Credit for Single-Leg 
CUBE Auctions set forth in Section I.G. (the ``Initiating Participant 
Credit'').
    As further discussed below, the proposed changes are designed to 
encourage ATP Holders to increase volume in a variety of transactions 
on the Exchange, including CUBE auction volume, Customer Electronic 
volume, and Professional Electronic volume.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ For purposes of this filing, ``Professional'' Electronic 
volume includes: Professional Customer, Broker Dealer, Non-NYSE 
American Options Market Maker, and Firm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to implement this fee change on October 12, 
2022.
Proposed Rule Change
Complex CUBE Auction Alternative Initiating Participant Rebate
    Section I.G. of the Fee Schedule sets forth the per contract fees 
and credits for executions associated with Single-Leg and Complex CUBE 
Auctions. To encourage participation in Complex CUBE Auctions, the 
Exchange offers rebates on certain initiating Complex CUBE volume. 
Currently, the Exchange offers the ACE Initiating Participant Rebate to 
ATP Holders that also qualify for the American Customer Engagement 
(``ACE'') Program \6\ and the Complex CUBE Rebate for ATP Holders that 
do not qualify for the ACE program.\7\ Both the ACE Initiating 
Participant Rebate and the Complex CUBE Rebate provide for a rebate of 
$0.10 per contract, and an ATP Holder that qualifies for both rebates 
is entitled to only the greater of the two.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Fee Schedule, Section I.E., American Customer Engagement 
(``ACE'') Program, available at: https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/markets/american-options/NYSE_American_Options_Fee_Schedule.pdf.
    \7\ See id. at Section I.G., CUBE Auction Fees and Credits, 
Complex CUBE Auction.
    \8\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, ATP Holders that meet each of the following monthly 
qualification levels are eligible to receive the Complex CUBE Rebate: 
(a) 10,000 contracts ADV from Initiating CUBE orders in Complex CUBE 
Auctions; (b) Customer Electronic executions of 0.05% of TCADV, 
excluding CUBE Auctions, QCC Transactions, and volume from orders 
routed to another exchange; and (c) Professional (as defined in Section 
I.H. of the Fee Schedule) Electronic executions of 0.03% of TCADV, 
excluding CUBE Auctions, QCC Transactions, and volume from orders 
routed to another exchange.
    The Exchange proposes to modify the qualifications for the Complex 
CUBE Rebate to require that ATP Holders execute: (a) 5,000 contracts 
ADV from Initiating CUBE orders in Complex CUBE Auctions; (b) Customer 
Electronic executions of 0.03% of TCADV, excluding CUBE Auctions, QCC 
Transactions, and volume from orders routed to another exchange; and 
(c) Professional (as defined in Section I.H. of the Fee Schedule) 
Electronic executions of 0.02% of TCADV, excluding CUBE Auctions, QCC 
Transactions, and volume from orders routed to another exchange.

[[Page 63538]]

    The Exchange does not propose to modify the amount of the Complex 
CUBE Rebate (which will remain at $0.10 per contract), and an ATP 
Holder that qualifies for both the ACE Initiating Participant Rebate 
and the Complex CUBE Rebate will continue to be entitled only to the 
greater of the two rebates.
Credit on Customer Electronic Simple and Complex Executions
    As set forth in Section I.H. of the Fee Schedule, ATP Holders are 
currently eligible to receive the Customer Credit of $0.10 per contract 
on Customer Electronic Simple and Complex executions, excluding CUBE 
Auctions, QCC Transactions, and volume from orders routed to another 
exchange, by meeting each of the following monthly qualification 
levels: (a) 10,000 contracts ADV from Initiating CUBE Orders in Complex 
CUBE Auctions; (b) Customer Electronic executions of 0.05% of TCADV, 
excluding CUBE Auctions, QCC Transactions, and volume from orders 
routed to another exchange; and (c) Professional Electronic executions 
of 0.03% of TCADV, excluding CUBE Auctions, QCC Transactions, and 
volume from orders routed to another exchange.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See id. at Section I.H. In calculating an OFP's Electronic 
volume, the Exchange will include the activity of either (i) 
Affiliates of the OFP, such as when an OFP has an Affiliated NYSE 
American Options Market Making firm, or (ii) an Appointed MM of such 
OFP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to modify the qualifications for the Customer 
Credit to require that ATP Holders execute: (a) 5,000 contracts ADV 
from Initiating CUBE orders in Complex CUBE Auctions; (b) Customer 
Electronic executions of 0.03% of TCADV, excluding CUBE Auctions, QCC 
Transactions, and volume from orders routed to another exchange; and 
(c) Professional (as defined in Section I.H. of the Fee Schedule) 
Electronic executions of 0.02% of TCADV, excluding CUBE Auctions, QCC 
Transactions, and volume from orders routed to another exchange. The 
Exchange does not propose to modify the amount of the Customer Credit, 
which will remain at $0.10 per contract.
Single-Leg CUBE Auction Initiating Participant Credit
    Section I.G. of the Fee Schedule sets forth the rates for per 
contract fees and credits for executions associated with Single-Leg and 
Complex CUBE Auctions.\10\ To encourage participants to utilize Single-
Leg CUBE Auctions, the Exchange offers rebates and credits on certain 
initiating Single-Leg CUBE volume. Currently, as described in Note 1 in 
the Single-Leg CUBE Auction section of Section I.G., the Exchange 
offers Initiating Participant Credits for each contract in a Contra 
Order paired with a CUBE Order that does not trade with the CUBE Order 
because it is replaced in the auction.\11\ The Exchange offers a $0.30 
per contract credit for Penny issues and a $0.70 per contract credit 
for Non-Penny issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See id. at Section I.G., CUBE Auction Fees & Credits.
    \11\ See id., Single-Leg CUBE Auction, note 1 (setting forth 
both the ACE Initiating Participant Rebate and the Alternative 
Initiating Participant Rebate).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to modify the amounts of the Initiating 
Participant Credits to offer a $0.26 per contract credit for Penny 
issues and a $0.65 per contract credit for Non-Penny issues. The 
Exchange further proposes to modify Note 1 to provide that ATP Holders 
that execute at least 0.40% of TCADV in Electronic Customer Complex 
Orders would be eligible for an increased Initiating Participant Credit 
of $0.30 per contract for Penny issues and $0.70 per contract for Non-
Penny issues, instead of the proposed $0.26 and $0.65 per contract 
credits for Penny and Non-Penny issues, respectively.
* * * * *
    The proposed changes are designed to incent ATP Holders to direct 
order flow to the Exchange and to encourage ATP Holders to engage in a 
variety of transactions on the Exchange. In particular, the Exchange 
believes the proposed change would encourage ATP Holders to direct more 
auction-eligible order flow, Customer Electronic volume, and 
Professional Electronic volume to the Exchange to qualify for the 
Complex CUBE Rebate, Customer Credit, and/or Initiating Participant 
Credit. The Exchange notes that the proposed changes to the Complex 
CUBE Rebate and Customer Credit would also maintain alignment between 
the requirements for the Complex CUBE Rebate and Customer Credit. The 
Exchange also believes that the proposed changes to the Initiating 
Participant Credit, although they would decrease the amount of the 
credit available to ATP Holders that do not execute the proposed 
required level of Electronic Customer Complex volume, would continue to 
provide an incentive for participation in Single-Leg CUBE Auctions, 
while also encouraging increased Electronic Customer Complex volume. 
Although the Exchange cannot predict with certainty whether ATP Holders 
will be incentivized to qualify for the Complex CUBE Rebate, Customer 
Credit, or Initiating Participant Credit, as modified, the Exchange 
believes that, to the extent that the proposed changes achieve their 
intended purpose, the increased liquidity on the Exchange would result 
in enhanced market quality for all participants.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\12\ in general, and furthers the 
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\13\ in particular, 
because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, 
fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons 
using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between 
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Proposed Rule Change is Reasonable
    The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. The 
Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over 
regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services 
in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, the Commission 
highlighted the importance of market forces in determining prices and 
SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation of the 
market system ``has been remarkably successful in promoting market 
competition in its broader forms that are most important to investors 
and listed companies.'' \14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (S7-10-04) (``Reg NMS 
Adopting Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    There are currently 16 registered options exchanges competing for 
order flow. Based on publicly-available information, and excluding 
index-based options, no single exchange has more than 16% of the market 
share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options 
trades.\15\ Therefore, currently no exchange possesses significant 
pricing power in the execution of multiply-listed equity and ETF 
options order flow. More specifically, in August 2022, the Exchange had 
less than 8% market share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity 
and ETF options trades.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ The OCC publishes options and futures volume in a variety 
of formats, including daily and monthly volume by exchange, 
available here: https://www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-Data-Reports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/Monthly-Weekly-Volume-Statistics.
    \16\ Based on a compilation of OCC data for monthly volume of 
equity-based options and monthly volume of ETF-based options, see 
id., the Exchange's market share in multiply listed equity and ETF 
options was 7.56% for the month of August 2021 and 7.57% for the 
month of August 2022.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 63539]]

    The Exchange's fees are constrained by intermarket competition, as 
ATP Holders may direct their order flow to any of the 16 options 
exchanges, including those offering incentives similar to the Complex 
CUBE Rebate, Customer Credit, and Initiating Participant Credit.\17\ 
Thus, ATP Holders have a choice of where they direct their order flow. 
The proposed modifications to the Complex CUBE Rebate, Customer Credit, 
and Initiating Participant Credit are designed to continue to encourage 
ATP Holders to engage in a variety of transactions on the Exchange and 
increase volume in CUBE auctions as well as Customer and Professional 
Electronic executions. The Exchange believes all market participants 
stand to benefit from increased order flow, which promotes market 
depth, facilitates tighter spreads, and enhances price discovery.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See, e.g., Cboe Exchange, Inc. (``Cboe'') Fee Schedule, 
Volume Incentive Program, available at: https://cdn.cboe.com/resources/membership/Cboe_FeeSchedule.pdf (providing per contract 
credits that, similar to the Complex CUBE Rebate and Customer 
Credit, have qualifications based on volume from a variety of 
executions, including auction volume, volume from various account 
types, and volume from both simple and complex executions); Cboe Fee 
Schedule, Break-Up Credits (offering break-up credits on certain 
orders executed through Cboe Automated Improvement Mechanism of 
$0.25 and $0.60 for penny and non-penny classes, respectively, 
similar to the Initiating Participant Credit for Single-Leg CUBE 
orders); Cboe EDGX (``EDGX'') Options Fee Schedule, Break-Up 
Credits, available at: https://www.cboe.com/us/options/membership/fee_schedule/edgx/ (offering break-up credits on certain orders 
executed through EDGX Automated Improvement Mechanism of $0.25 and 
$0.60 for penny and non-penny program securities, respectively, 
similar to the Initiating Participant Credit for Single-Leg CUBE 
orders).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share among the 
exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can 
shift order flow, or discontinue or reduce use of certain categories of 
products, in response to fee changes. Accordingly, competitive forces 
constrain options exchange transaction fees. Stated otherwise, changes 
to exchange transaction fees and rebates can have a direct effect on 
the ability of an exchange to compete for order flow.
    The proposed rule change is designed to continue to incent ATP 
Holders to direct liquidity to the Exchange in a variety of forms and 
from a variety of sources, thereby promoting market depth, price 
discovery, and price improvement and enhancing order execution 
opportunities for market participants. In particular, the Exchange 
believes it is reasonable to provide ATP Holders with a rebate or 
credit for achieving certain volume goals in different types of 
executions.
    The Exchange also believes that the proposed changes are designed 
to continue to encourage ATP Holders to execute a variety of orders on 
the Exchange. The Exchange further believes that maintaining the same 
criteria to qualify for the Complex CUBE Rebate or Customer Credit 
should encourage greater use of the Exchange by all ATP Holders, which 
may lead to greater opportunities to trade and for price improvement 
for all participants. The Exchange notes that all market participants 
stand to benefit from increased transaction volume, as such increase 
promotes market depth, facilitates tighter spreads and enhances price 
discovery, and may lead to a corresponding increase in order flow from 
other market participants.
    The Exchange cannot predict with certainty whether any ATP Holders 
would seek to qualify for the Complex CUBE Rebate or the Customer 
Credit, as modified, but believes that the proposed qualifying bases 
for the Complex CUBE Rebate and Customer Credit, which lower the volume 
necessary to qualify and maintain alignment between the volume 
requirements across the two incentives, are achievable for ATP Holders 
and would continue to incent ATP Holders to direct volume to the 
Exchange. The Exchange also believes that the proposed modification of 
the Initiating Participant Credit, although it would decrease the 
credit earned by ATP Holders that do not execute the proposed required 
level of Customer Electronic Complex volume, would continue to promote 
both participation in Single-Leg CUBE Auctions and increased Customer 
Electronic Complex volume directed to the Exchange.
    Finally, to the extent the proposed changes attract greater volume 
and liquidity, the Exchange believes the proposed changes would improve 
the Exchange's overall competitiveness and strengthen its market 
quality for all market participants. In the backdrop of the competitive 
environment in which the Exchange operates, the proposed rule changes 
are a reasonable attempt by the Exchange to increase the depth of its 
market and improve its market share relative to its competitors.
The Proposed Rule Change is an Equitable Allocation of Fees and Rebates
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is an equitable 
allocation of its fees and rebates. The proposal is based on the amount 
and type of business transacted on the Exchange, and ATP Holders can 
seek to qualify for these incentives or not. The Exchange further 
believes that, because ATP Holders would need to meet requirements 
based on Initiating CUBE Orders, Customer Electronic executions, and 
Professional Electronic executions in order to qualify for either the 
Complex CUBE Rebate or Customer Credit, and would need to meet a 
requirement based on Electronic Customer Complex to earn a higher 
Initiating Participant Credit on Single-Leg CUBE orders, the proposed 
changes are designed to continue to encourage ATP Holders to aggregate 
their executions at the Exchange as a primary execution venue. To the 
extent that the proposed changes attract more volume to the Exchange, 
this increased order flow would continue to make the Exchange a more 
competitive venue for order execution. Thus, the Exchange believes the 
proposed rule changes would improve market quality for all market 
participants on the Exchange and, as a consequence, attract more order 
flow to the Exchange thereby improving market-wide quality and price 
discovery.
The Proposed Rule Change is not Unfairly Discriminatory
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is not unfairly 
discriminatory because the proposed modifications would apply to all 
similarly-situated market participants on an equal and non-
discriminatory basis. The proposed changes are based on the amount and 
type of business transacted on the Exchange, and ATP Holders are not 
obligated to try to achieve any of the incentives offered. Rather, the 
proposals are designed to continue to encourage participants to utilize 
the Exchange as a primary trading venue (if they have not done so 
previously) and increase auction, Customer Electronic, and Professional 
Electronic volume sent to the Exchange. In addition, the proposed 
modifications would continue to align the requirements for the Customer 
Credit and Complex CUBE Rebate, which may lead to greater opportunities 
to trade--and for price improvement--for all participants.
    To the extent that the proposed changes attract more executions to 
the Exchange, this increased order flow would continue to make the 
Exchange a more competitive venue for order execution. Thus, the 
Exchange believes the proposed rule changes would improve market 
quality for all market participants on the Exchange and, as a 
consequence, attract more order flow to the Exchange thereby improving 
market-wide quality and price discovery. The

[[Page 63540]]

resulting increased volume and liquidity would provide more trading 
opportunities and tighter spreads to all market participants and thus 
would promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove 
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and 
a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the 
public interest.
    Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant 
competitive forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement 
regarding the burden on competition.
    For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal 
is consistent with the Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act, the Exchange does 
not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any burden on 
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. Instead, as discussed above, the Exchange believes 
that the proposed changes would encourage the submission of additional 
liquidity to a public exchange, thereby promoting market depth, price 
discovery and transparency and enhancing order execution opportunities 
for all market participants. As a result, the Exchange believes that 
the proposed changes further the Commission's goal in adopting 
Regulation NMS of fostering integrated competition among orders, which 
promotes ``more efficient pricing of individual stocks for all types of 
orders, large and small.'' \18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See Reg NMS Adopting Release, supra note 14, at 37499.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Intramarket Competition. The proposed change is designed to 
continue to attract increased and diverse order flow to the Exchange by 
offering competitive credits and rebates, which may increase the volume 
of contracts traded on the Exchange. Specifically, the Exchange 
believes the proposed rule change, by specifying requirements in 
auction, Customer Electronic, and Professional Electronic volume, would 
incent ATP Holders to participate in a variety of types of executions 
on the Exchange to qualify for the Complex CUBE Rebate, Customer 
Credit, and Initiating Participant Credit. To the extent that this 
purpose is achieved, all of the Exchange's market participants should 
benefit from the improved market liquidity. Enhanced market quality and 
increased transaction volume resulting from the anticipated increase in 
order flow directed to the Exchange would benefit all market 
participants and improve competition on the Exchange.
    Intermarket Competition. The Exchange operates in a highly 
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor one 
of the 16 competing option exchanges if they deem fee levels at a 
particular venue to be excessive. In such an environment, the Exchange 
must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other 
exchanges and to attract order flow to the Exchange. Based on publicly-
available information, and excluding index-based options, no single 
exchange currently has more than 16% of the market share of executed 
volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options trades.\19\ Therefore, 
no exchange currently possesses significant pricing power in the 
execution of multiply-listed equity and ETF options order flow. More 
specifically, in August 2022, the Exchange had less than 8% market 
share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options 
trades.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See supra note 15.
    \20\ Based on a compilation of OCC data for monthly volume of 
equity-based options and monthly volume of ETF-based options, see 
id., the Exchange's market share in multiply listed equity and ETF 
options was 7.56% for the month of August 2021 and 7.57% for the 
month of August 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change reflects this 
competitive environment because it modifies the Exchange's fees and 
rebates in a manner designed to encourage ATP Holders to direct trading 
interest to the Exchange, to provide liquidity and to attract order 
flow. Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed change 
would encourage ATP Holders to direct increased and diverse volume to 
the Exchange, thereby increasing the number of executions (and 
executions of varying types) on the Exchange. The Exchange further 
believes that maintaining consistency between the requirements for the 
Complex CUBE Rebate and Customer Credit could make the incentives more 
achievable for ATP Holders and would thus continue to make the Exchange 
a more attractive and competitive venue for order execution. To the 
extent that this purpose is achieved, all the Exchange's market 
participants should benefit from the improved market quality and 
increased opportunities for price improvement.
    Thus, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes could promote 
competition between the Exchange and other execution venues, including 
those that currently offer similar pricing incentives, by encouraging 
additional orders to be sent to the Exchange for execution.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \21\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 
19b-4 \22\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other 
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \22\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under 
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \23\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed 
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2022-48 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2022-48. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your

[[Page 63541]]

comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission 
will post all comments on the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent 
amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule 
change that are filed with the Commission, and all written 
communications relating to the proposed rule change between the 
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from 
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 
available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official 
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of 
the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the 
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted 
without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do 
not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment 
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make 
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NYSEAMER-2022-48, and should be submitted on or before November 9, 
2022.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-22663 Filed 10-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P