Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0072-0013
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2004-05-27T04:00Z

Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Characterizing
Exhaust
Emissions
from
Light­
Duty
Gasoline
Vehicles
in
the
Kansas
City
Metropolitan
Area
1.0
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
The
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA),
the
Coordinating
Research
Council
(
CRC),
the
U.
S.
Department
of
Energy's
(
DOE)
National
Renewable
Energy
Lab
(
NREL),
the
U.
S.
Department
of
Transportation
(
DOT)
Federal
Highway
Administration
(
FHWA),
and
the
State
and
Territorial
Air
Pollution
Program
Administrators/
Association
of
Local
Air
Pollution
Control
Officials
(
STAPPA/
ALAPCO)
propose
to
conduct
a
program
to
evaluate
exhaust
emissions
from
light­
duty
gasoline
vehicles.
The
proposed
program
consists
of
measuring
particulate
matter
(
PM)
and
other
components
in
exhaust
emissions
of
480
randomly
selected,
light­
duty
vehicles
in
the
Kansas
City
Metropolitan
Area.
A
sampling
plan
has
been
developed
that
will
allow
for
the
determination
of
the
distribution
of
particulate
matter
(
PM)
and
other
emissions
in
the
sampled
fleet
as
well
as
the
identification
of
the
percent
of
high
emitters.
Data
obtained
from
this
program
will
be
used
to
evaluate
and
update
existing
and
future
mobile
source
emission
models
(
MOBILE6
and
MOVES),
evaluate
existing
emission
inventories
and
assess
the
representativeness
of
previous
PM
emissions
studies.

2.0
BACKGROUND
Mobile
sources
significantly
contribute
to
ambient
concentrations
of
air
contaminants,
including
particulate
matter.
Recent
source
apportionment
studies
for
PM
10
and
PM
2.5
indicate
that
mobile
sources
can
be
responsible
for
over
half
of
the
ambient
PM
measured
in
an
urban
area
(
Motallebi,
1999;
Magliano,
1998;
Dzubay
et
al.,
1988).
Some
of
these
source
apportionment
studies
have
attempted
to
differentiate
between
contributions
from
gasoline
and
diesel
combustion.
Studies
conducted
in
Denver
and
Phoenix
indicated
that
gasoline
combustion
from
mobile
sources
contributed
more
to
ambient
PM
than
diesel
combustion
(
Lawson
and
Smith,
1998;
Ramadan,
2000).
However,
studies
conducted
in
Los
Angeles
and
the
San
Joaquin
Valley
in
California
indicate
that
diesel
combustion
contributed
more
than
gasoline
combustion
to
ambient
PM
(
Schauer
et
al.,
1996;
Schauer
and
Cass,
2000).
Existing
emission
inventories
developed
by
the
EPA
also
suggest
diesel
vehicles
contribute
more
than
gasoline
vehicles
to
ambient
PM
concentrations.
Exhaust
emissions
of
particulate
matter
from
gasoline­
powered
motor
vehicles
have
changed
significantly
over
the
past
25
years
(
Cadle
et
al.,
1999).
These
changes
have
resulted
from
reformulation
of
fuels,
the
wide
application
of
exhaust
gas
treatment,
and
changes
in
engine
design
and
operation.
Because
of
these
evolving
tailpipe
emissions,
along
with
the
wide
variability
of
emissions
between
vehicles
of
the
same
class
(
Hildemann
et
al.,
1991;
Cadle
et
al.,
1997;
Sagebiel
et
al.,
1997;
Yanowitz
et
al.,
2000),
well­
defined
average
emissions
profiles
for
the
major
classes
of
motor
vehicles
have
not
been
established.
The
majority
of
exhaust
PM
emitted
by
motor
vehicles
is
in
the
PM
2.5
size
range.
Kleeman
et
al.,
(
2000)
have
shown
that
gasoline
and
diesel
fueled
vehicles
produce
particles
that
are
mostly
less
than
2.0
µ
m
in
diameter.
Cadle
et
al.,
(
1999)
found
that
91%
of
PM
emitted
by
in­
use
gasoline
vehicles
in
the
Denver
area
was
in
the
PM
2.5
size
range,
which
increased
to
97%
for
"
smokers"
(
i.
e.,
light­
duty
vehicles
with
visible
smoke
emitted
from
their
tailpipes).
Durbin
et
al.,(
1999)
found
that
92%
of
the
PM
was
smaller
than
2.5
µ
m
for
smokers.
The
mass
median
diameter
of
the
PM
emitted
by
the
gasoline
vehicles
sampled
by
Cadle
et
al.,
(
1999)
was
about
0.12
µ
m,
which
increased
to
0.18
µ
m
for
smokers.
Corresponding
average
emissions
rates
of
PM
2.5
were
38
mg/
mi
for
normal
emitting
gasoline
vehicles
and
222
mg/
mi
for
gasoline
smokers.
Emissions
from
smokers
are
comparable
to
those
from
diesel
vehicles.
Thus,
older
and
poorly
maintained
gasoline
vehicles
could
be
significant
sources
of
PM
2.5
(
Sagebiel
et
al.,
1997;
Lawson
and
Smith,
1998).
Durbin
et
al.
(
1999)
point
out
that
although
smokers
constitute
only
1.1
to
1.7%
of
the
light­
duty
fleet
in
the
South
Coast
Air
Quality
Management
District
in
California,
they
contribute
roughly
20%
of
the
total
PM
emissions
from
the
light­
duty
fleet.
Motor
vehicles
that
are
high
emitters
of
hydrocarbons
and
carbon
monoxide
can
be
high
emitters
of
PM
(
Sagebiel
et
al.,
1997;
Cadle
et
al.,
1997).
National
distributions
of
smokers
and
high
emitting
vehicles
for
PM
have
not
been
evaluated.
A
major
obstacle
in
previous
emissions
testing
studies
has
been
the
recruitment
of
vehicles.
Most
studies
have
not
incorporated
random
sampling
in
the
study
design
due
to
the
high
non­
participation
rate
and
the
high
incentive
costs
associated
with
random
sampling
of
vehicles.
Therefore,
few
studies,
and
no
studies
evaluating
light­
duty
PM
emissions,
can
be
used
to
represent
the
distribution
of
vehicle
emissions
in
a
large
population.
The
EPA,
CRC,
NREL,
DOT,
and
the
STAPPA/
ALAPCO
and
EPA
Emission
Inventory
Improvement
Program
(
EIIP),
hereafter
referred
to
as
the
Project
"
Sponsors",
plan
to
conduct
a
program
to
characterize
exhaust
emissions
from
light­
duty
gasoline
vehicles.
Data
obtained
from
this
program
will
be
used
to
evaluate
and
update
existing
and
future
mobile
source
emission
models
(
MOBILE6
and
MOVES)
and
evaluate
existing
emission
inventories.
For
the
purpose
of
this
RFP,
the
term
"
Contractor"
shall
include
the
primary
contractor
and
any
subcontractors
awarded
the
project
task
order.
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
3.0
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
The
Sponsors
propose
to
conduct
exhaust
emissions
testing
on
480
light­
duty,
gasoline
vehicles
in
the
Kansas
City
Metropolitan
Area
(
KCMA).
The
goal
of
the
project
is
to
determine
the
distribution
of
PM
emissions
in
a
randomly
selected
fleet
as
well
as
identify
the
percent
of
high
emitters
in
the
fleet.
The
project
will
also
characterize
gaseous
and
PM
toxics
exhaust
emissions
from
a
portion
of
these
light­
duty
vehicles.
Data
obtained
from
this
program
will
be
used
to
evaluate
and
update
emission
models,
evaluate
existing
emission
inventories,
and
assess
the
representativeness
of
previous
emissions
studies.
EPA
through
its
Project
Officer
will
represent
the
Sponsors
during
this
test
program.
The
contractor
will
address
and
forward
all
issues
and
technical
assistance
through
EPA
Project
Officer.
The
Project
Officer
will
disseminate
this
information
to
the
Sponsors
to
get
the
best
advice
on
how
to
proceed.
The
information
from
the
contractor
can
be
sent
to
the
Sponsors
and
the
EPA
Project
Officer
at
the
same
time
but
only
the
Project
Officer
can
give
technical
guidance
to
the
contractor.
The
EPA
Project
Officer
will
assume
the
responsibility
that
all
Sponsors
are
provided
the
information
in
a
timely
fashion.
The
Sponsors
will
assure
that
they
or
their
representative
give
timely
advice
back
to
the
Project
Officer
in
order
to
keep
delays
to
a
minimum.

The
EPA
Project
Officer,
or
any
representatives
of
the
project
sponsors,
will
conduct
audits
of
all
facets
of
the
project.
The
contractor
may
be
notified
prior
to
an
audit;
however,
the
sponsors
reserve
the
right
to
conduct
audits
without
notification.

The
project
description
has
been
divided
into
three
main
sections:
Vehicle
Recruitment
and
Pilot
Studies,
Vehicle
Testing,
and
Sample
Analysis.
The
contractor
shall
ensure
integration
of
all
three
work
areas.
Specific
tasks
associated
with
each
of
these
work
areas
are
listed
in
Section
5.

3.1
Vehicle
Recruitment
Vehicle
recruitment
activities
will
be
designed
to
identify
the
distribution
of
PM
emissions
from
gasoline
vehicles
in
order
to
better
evaluate
the
contribution
of
gasoline
high
emitters
to
ambient
PM
concentrations.
Vehicles
will
be
recruited
from
the
Kansas
City
Metropolitan
Area
(
KCMA)
(
see
Figure
1).
The
sample
size
estimation
was
derived
from
data
based
on
a
previous
study
(
CRC
E­
24)
in
which
EPA
estimated
the
initial
sample
size,
estimated
the
effective
sample
size,
and
then
allocated
the
effective
sample
among
strata.(
see
Appendix
B)
For
the
purposes
of
this
task
order
the
KCMA
consists,
at
a
minimum,
of
the
counties
of
Wyandotte
and
Johnson
in
Kansas;
and
Jackson,
Cass,
Clay,
and
Platte
in
Missouri.
In
order
to
increase
the
likelihood
of
obtaining
a
representative
sample
population
and
a
high
participation
rate,
the
contractor
will
obtain
a
cohort,
(
existing
or
newly
developed),
from
which
vehicles
will
be
randomly
recruited
for
emissions
testing.
The
cohort
shall
include
a
socioeconomically
diverse
group
of
citizens
that
represent
the
demographics
of
the
KCMA.
Additionally,
the
contractor
shall
compare
the
characteristics
of
the
vehicles
owned
by
the
cohort
to
those
of
the
Kansas
City
and
national
fleets
to
assess
the
representativeness
of
the
cohort
population.
The
contractor
shall
include
an
assessment
of
the
effect
of
non­
respondents
to
the
cohort
development
program.
In
addition,
the
contractor
shall
document
and
evaluate
non­
respondents
to
the
emissions
testing
program
to
ensure
non­
biased
sample
collection.
The
following
information
will
be
required
for
this
assessment:

°
Geo­
demographic
data
for
the
cohort
including
vehicle
ownership,
approximate
residence
location,
and
socioeconomic
status.
°
Vehicle
characteristics
for
the
cohort
group
including
year,
make,
model,
and
mileage
of
all
owned
vehicles.
°
Comparisons
of
select
volunteer
vehicle's
oxides
of
nitrogen
(
NO
x),
carbon
monoxide
(
CO),
and
hydrocarbon
(
HC)
emissions
to
other
vehicle
emissions
in
the
Kansas
City
fleet.
°
Detailed
on­
road
vehicle
fleet
characteristics
for
the
KCMA.
°
Vehicle
registration
database
for
the
KCMA
which
includes
both
vehicle
characteristics
listed
above
and
vehicle
ownership
(
name
and
address).
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Figure
1.
Map
of
the
Kansas
City
Metropolitan
Area.

Vehicles
will
be
recruited
from
the
KCMA
for
two
rounds
of
emissions
testing:
Round
1
during
the
summer,
2003
and
Round
2
during
the
winter,
2003/
2004.
Two
sources
will
be
considered
as
sample
frames
for
test
vehicles.

Cohort
Sample:
The
contractor
shall
draw
a
random
sample
of
400
vehicles
from
the
sociodemographically
representative
cohort
chosen
by
the
contractor
for
the
purpose
of
this
project.
The
contractor
shall
also
draw
a
random
sample
of
80
vehicles
from
non­
respondents
to
the
cohort
(
described
in
Section
3.1.3).
The
sample
shall
be
stratified
by
vehicle
age
and
class
with
target
recruitment
numbers
as
shown
in
Table
1.
EPA
does
not
possess
any
cohort
data
for
Kansas
City
or
any
other
locality.
However,
EPA
is
aware
of
data
being
collected
through
a
DOT
Congestion,
Mitigation
Air
Quality
(
CMAQ)
grant
administered
through
the
Mid­
America
Regional
Council
(
MARC)
in
Kansas
City.
The
mention
of
this
data
does
not
constitute
a
recommendation
to
use
this
data
set.
In
addition,
there
might
be
other
sources
of
data
available
in
the
region.
(
Note:
Specific
guidelines
have
not
been
established
on
what
constitutes
a
"
diverse"
population.
In
general,
the
contractor
shall
ensure
that
multiple
ethnicities
and
socioeconomic
classes
are
included
in
the
project.
The
contractor
shall
also
ensure
the
demographic
data
is
obtained
for
all
respondents.)

Registration
Sample:
The
Sponsors
recognize
that
a
demographically
representative
cohort
group
may
not
possess
a
sufficient
mix
of
vehicles,
or
the
vehicles
may
not
be
representative
of
the
general
fleet.
The
contractor
shall
provide
the
EPA
representative
with
the
vehicle
registration
database
for
the
KCMA.
The
EPA
representative
shall
randomly
select
400
vehicles
from
this
database
(
vehicles
from
the
cohort)
stratified
by
vehicle
age
and
class
with
target
recruitment
numbers
as
shown
in
Table
1.
The
contractor
shall
also
draw
a
random
sample
of
80
vehicles
from
non­
respondents
to
the
cohort
(
described
in
Section
3.1.3).
The
contractor
shall
obtain
socio­
demographic
data
on
all
vehicle
owners
chosen
in
this
sample
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
frame
if
this
sample
frame
is
used
for
recruitment.
(
Note:
EPA
has
not
made
prior
arrangements
with
the
States
representing
Kansas
City
for
vehicle
registration
data.
The
contractor
should
contact
MARC
and
the
State's
Department
of
Motor
Vehicles
to
arrange
for
this
data.
EPA
and
Contractors
shall
consider
all
vehicle
owner
data
acquired
as
confidential
with
proper
safe
guards
to
ensure
its
access
is
restricted.
This
personal
data
will
be
destroyed
after
the
test
program
has
ended).

3.1.1
Sample
Representativeness
Assessment.
The
contractor
shall
determine
the
representativeness
of
the
cohort
sample
for
use
in
vehicle
recruitment.
The
contractor
shall
compare
the
characteristics
of
the
cohort
fleet,
by
make
and
model
year,
to
the
Kansas
City
area
fleet
and
the
national
fleet.
The
contractor
shall
also
compare
vehicle
exhaust
emissions
of
NOx,
HCs,
and
CO
for
select
cohort
vehicles
and
Kansas
City
fleet
vehicles
using
new
or
previously
collected
remote
sensing
data
(
RSD).
Existing
RSD
could
be
used
for
assessing
sample
representativeness
if
applicable.
(
Note:
PM
RSD
measurements
are
not
an
acceptable
method
for
comparing
emissions
from
RSD
response
and
non­
response
vehicles.
RSD
data
for
gaseous
compounds
does
not
always
correlate
well
with
PM
emissions.
In
addition,
PM
RSD
techniques
are
not
well
proven.)
Second­
by­
second
chassis
dynamometer
emissions
data
from
the
Unified
Cycle
may
be
compared
against
remote
sensing
data
collected
from
the
Kansas
City
area
fleet
as
one
approach.
Recommended
standard
remote
sensing
data
collection
protocols
can
be
found
at
www.
crcao.
com
(
see
E­
23
Interim
Report).
The
selected
approach
must
be
justified
in
detail
to
ensure
representativeness
of
Kansas
City
area
fleet
remote
sensing
data
to
the
general
vehicle
population
and
subsequent
comparison
of
this
data
to
the
study
test
fleet
including
appropriate
weighting
of
the
data
used
in
this
assessment.
The
contractor
shall
also
conduct
a
double
blind
comparison
between
the
proposed
sample
obtained
using
the
cohort
sample
frame
and
the
proposed
sample
using
the
registration
sample
frame
to
ensure
representativeness
of
the
vehicles
recruited
for
the
program.

3.1.2
Vehicle
Selection.
The
contractor
shall
be
responsible
for
documenting
and
contacting
all
owners
of
vehicles
chosen
for
emissions
testing.
The
contractor
shall
have
the
capability
of
multilingual
recruitment
(
English
and
Spanish
at
a
minimum)
to
ensure
that
a
majority
of
the
KCMA
population
can
participate
in
the
program.
If
the
cohort
sample
is
deemed
representative,
this
database
will
be
used
for
vehicle
recruitment.
Otherwise,
the
registration
sample
will
be
used
by
the
contractor
for
recruitment.
All
vehicles
in
the
sample
frame
shall
be
binned
into
a
sample
stratum.
Vehicles
shall
be
randomly
selected
from
each
stratum,
so
that
all
vehicles
in
the
stratum
have
an
equal
probability
of
selection.
(
This
means
that
all
vehicles
in
the
cohort
sample
will
be
assigned
to
a
stratum
based
on
year
and
type
of
vehicle
and
then
vehicles
within
each
stratum
will
be
randomly
selected.)
The
total
number
of
tests
to
be
performed
for
the
program
is
shown
in
Table
2.

Table
1.
Estimated
Sample
Sizes
by
Stratum
to
Achieve
Data
Precision
Goals
(
includes
positive
respondents
and
non­
respondents).

Stratum
(
h)
Vehicle
Class
Age
Class
Sample
size
(
nh)
1
1
Truck
Pre
1980
50
2
Truck
1980
 
1990
100
3
Truck
1991­
1995
70
4
Truck
1996
and
newer
40
5
Car
Pre
1980
40
6
Car
1980
 
1990
50
7
Car
1991­
1995
80
8
Car
1996
and
newer
50
Total
480
Table
2.
Estimated
Number
of
Vehicles
Recruited
and
Test
Performed
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Different
Vehicles
Tests
Round
1
Positive
Respondents
from
Cohort
170
170
Replicate
Vehicle
Tests
0
15
Non­
respondent
from
Cohorta
80
80
Weekly
calibration
vehicle
test
b
0
12
Total
250
277
Round
2
Positive
Respondents
from
Cohort
230
230
Non­
respondent
from
Cohorta
0
0
Replicate
Vehicle
Tests
0
10
Repeat
Vehicles
from
Round
1b
25
25
Weekly
calibration
vehicle
test
b
0
12
Total
255
277
a
see
Section
3.1.3
for
description
of
this
activity.
b
see
Section
3.2.3
for
description
of
this
activity.
Total
vehicles
includes
non­
response
assessment.

3.1.3
Non­
Response
Assessment.
As
part
of
the
recruitment
process,
the
contractor
shall
randomly
select
eighty
(
80)
people
who
did
not
positively
respond
to
the
initial
request
to
participate
in
the
cohort.
These
owner's
vehicles
will
be
recruited
to
the
program
to
assess
any
potential
bias
in
results
from
the
recruitment
of
volunteers
to
the
study.
A
list
of
nonrespondent
criteria
will
be
developed
with
approval
from
the
EPA
Project
Officer
after
consulting
with
the
Sponsors.
As
shown
in
Table
3,
the
number
of
vehicles
to
target
in
each
stratum
for
the
non­
response
analysis
shall
be
proportional
to
the
vehicles
recruited
for
the
total
population.
The
contractor
shall
propose
criteria
to
determining
methods
that
achieve
a
high
participation
rate
for
non­
respondents
which
might
include
different
incentive
packages
for
different
cohort
stratum.
The
contractor
can
propose
a
different
criteria
for
what
constitutes
a
non­
respondent
but
shall
provide
documentation
supporting
its
approach.

Table
3.
Estimated
Sample
Sizes
by
Stratum
for
Non­
Respondent
Testing
Stratum
(
h)
Vehicle
Class
Age
Class
Sample
size
(
nh)
1
1
Truck
Pre
1980
8
2
Truck
1980­
1990
16
3
Truck
1991­
1995
12
4
Truck
1996
and
newer
7
5
Car
Pre
1980
7
6
Car
1980
 
1990
8
7
Car
1991­
1995
14
8
Car
1996
and
newer
8
Total
80
1
Number
of
randomly
selected
vehicles
tested
for
the
non­
response
assessment.

3.1.4
Participation
Incentives
Incentives
will
be
required
for
study
participants.
At
a
minimum,
participants
will
require
the
use
of
a
rental
vehicle
during
testing
of
their
vehicle.
Other
likely
incentives
include
cash,
free
gasoline,
free
repairs,
and
free
cleanup
of
participant
vehicles.
Since
the
vehicles
will
likely
be
randomly
chosen
from
the
cohort,
incentive
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
requirements
may
be
less
than
for
previous
testing
programs.
However,
incentives
must
be
adequate
to
ensure
the
lowest
possible
rejection
rate
from
study
participants.
Incentive
packages
will
be
reviewed
and
refined
in
a
pilot
study
program
as
described
in
section
3.1.5
in
order
to
assure
a
high
participation
rate
and
reduce
both
contractor
time
and
cost.
If
a
vehicle
is
rejected
for
some
reason
when
the
vehicle
is
inspected
(
see
section
3.2.1),
the
potential
participant
should
be
compensated
for
their
time
and
trouble.
The
contractor
shall
propose
a
rejection
participation
package
if
this
situation
occurs.
From
previous
studies,
the
Sponsors
have
developed
an
outline
on
the
cost
of
incentives
that
might
be
used
by
the
contractor
to
reduce
rejection
rates.
The
contractor
can
propose
other
incentives
packages
that
they
feel
might
improve
the
response
rate
for
the
program
and/
or
reduce
contractor's
time
in
managing
the
incentives
program.
A
separate
emission
and
activity
program
involving
portable
emission
measurement
system
(
PEMS)
or
portable
activity
measurement
system
(
PAMS)
will
need
additional
incentives
for
selected
participants
whose
vehicles
would
have
this
device.
See
Section
3.2.4
for
details.

The
contractor
will
propose
a
budget
for
achieving
these
goals
outlined
in
this
section.
Monthly
progress
reports
itemizing
incentive
expenditures
and
details
on
those
expenditures
shall
be
provided
to
the
Contracting
Officer
and
the
Project
Officer.
The
Contractor
shall
notify
the
Project
Officer
when
75%
of
the
incentive
funds
have
been
expended.

Table
4.
Incentives.

Type
of
Incentives
Incentive
Cost
Cash
$
200
(
if
using
a
rental
vehicle)
$
275
(
for
not
using
a
rental
vehicle)
Full
Tank
of
Gasoline
$
25
Rental
Vehicle
$
75
(
for
up
to
three
days)
Car
Wash
(
possible)
$
10
PEMS
/
PAMS
Use
$
50
Total
$
360
3.1.5
Vehicle
Recruitment
Pilot
Study
The
contractor
shall
conduct
a
pilot
study
to
evaluate
recruitment
methods
and
incentive
packages
to
identify
the
adequacy
of
the
proposed
recruitment
process
in
achieving
a
high
response
rate
from
vehicle
owners
(
positive
respondents
and
non­
respondents)
and
to
assure
proper
flow
of
vehicles
for
emission
testing.
The
contractor
shall
propose
methods
and
evaluate
methods
from
this
pilot
study.
The
contractor
shall
include
in
their
proposal
methods
that
will
be
used
for
contacting
participants
that
include:
mode
of
contact
(
phone
calling,
letter)
,
number
and
frequency
of
contacts,
and
incentives.
The
pilot
vehicle
recruitment
study
should
indicate
cost
savings
in
reduced
contractor's
time
burden
and
savings
for
recruiting
vehicles.
Vehicles
do
not
have
to
be
recruited
during
this
pilot
study
but
focus
groups
could
be
used
as
one
way
to
evaluate
recruitment
methods
and
incentive
packages
for
different
geodemographic
groups.

3.1.6
Data
Management.
The
contractor
shall
maintain
all
data
records,
and
make
all
databases
used
in
the
assessment
accessible
to
the
EPA
Project
Officer
and
to
the
Sponsors.
The
contractor
shall
document
all
statistical
methods
used
in
determining
the
representativeness
of
the
vehicles
chosen
for
the
sample
frame.
The
contractor
shall
also
maintain
a
list
of
all
vehicle
owners
contacted
for
recruitment
to
the
study.
The
contractor
shall
list
the
person
contacted,
socio­
demographic
information
associated
with
each
person
contacted,
the
response,
and
the
incentives
required,
if
the
response
is
positive.
To
identify
all
people
contacted
for
participation
in
the
study,
the
contractor
shall
use
a
confidential,
unique
identification
code
to
protect
the
privacy
of
all
individuals.

3.2
Vehicle
Testing
All
vehicle
testing
will
occur
outdoors
under
ambient
conditions.
The
contractor
shall
select
a
suitable
location
that
provides
security
and
accessibility
for
all
project
participants.
The
general
testing
site
area
needed
to
conduct
the
program
is
approximately
100
ft
x
200
ft
for
equipment
(
transportable
dynamometer
and
trailers)
plus
room
for
vehicles.
The
contractor
shall
provide
cover
to
ensure
that
all
equipment
and
vehicles
are
protected
from
the
elements
during
participation
in
the
study.
The
contractor
shall
be
responsible
for
identifying
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
and
procuring
a
suitable
location
for
conducting
the
emissions
tests
and
covering
the
costs
of
shipping
the
portable
dynamometer
to
and
from
the
testing
location
in
Kansas
City
(
dynamometer
is
located
in
Research
Triangle
Park
Area,
NC).
The
contractor
shall
be
responsible
for
providing
the
following
electrical
power
at
the
site
needed
to
power
the
sampling
equipment,
and
the
dynamometer:

 
60
amp,
3
phase,
480
v.
 
200
amp.,
1
phase,
240
v.

The
contractor
and
subcontractor(
s)
are
required
to
have
insurance
that
covers
vehicles
procured
from
the
public
that
might
be
damaged
while
in
their
possession.
All
vehicles
whether
they
are
insured
or
uninsured
will
be
tested.
(
None,
if
any,
uninsured
vehicle
should
occur
since
State's
require
vehicle
insurance.)

The
contractor
may
need
to
provide
vehicles
for
the
duration
of
the
study:
a
full­
sized
vehicle
for
moving
heavy
equipment
and
a
vehicle
for
transporting
people.

3.2.1
Vehicle
Inspection,
Maintenance,
and
Conditioning
All
vehicles
shall
be
inspected
upon
arrival
to
the
testing
facility.
To
lessen
the
chance
of
an
owner
complaining
that
the
car
was
scratched
or
damaged,
a
video
recording
is
recommended.
The
major
components
of
the
inspection
are
engine
condition
(
engine
noises,
whether
it
"
knocks"
or
other
"
noises"),
tire
condition,
brake
condition,
and
integrity
of
the
exhaust
system.
All
appropriately
equipped
vehicles
shall
have
their
OBD
system
scanned.
The
scan
results
shall
be
reported
along
with
the
type
of
OBD
systems
found
on
the
vehicle,
such
as
OBDI
or
OBDII.
Any
defects
or
deficiencies
in
the
vehicle
condition
that
pose
a
danger
to
testing
personnel
will
be
repaired
by
the
contractor.
Any
defects
or
deficiencies
in
the
vehicle
condition
that
will
not
affect
exhaust
emissions
will
not
be
repaired
by
the
contractor
since
the
goal
of
the
project
is
not
to
reject
any
vehicle
due
to
operating
condition.
All
repairs
shall
be
documented.
If
a
vehicle
cannot
be
repaired
to
a
condition
that
does
not
pose
a
safety
risk
to
project
participants,
the
vehicle
must
be
rejected.
Detailed
information
on
all
vehicles
must
be
obtained
and
recorded
for
the
overall
vehicle
study
even
if
a
vehicle
is
rejected.
Portable
Emission
Measurement
Systems
(
PEMS)
or
Portable
Activity
Measurement
Systems
(
PAMS)
devices
might
be
used
to
further
characterize
these
rejected
vehicles.
Initial
vehicle
data
will
be
collected
and
recorded
on
a
computerized
vehicle
information
form.
Recorded
information
is
not
limited
to
but
will
include
date
and
time
of
vehicle
procurement,
date
and
time
of
vehicle
testing,
test
number,
vehicle
license
plate
number,
make,
model,
model
year,
odometer,
engine
family
number,
vehicle
identification
number
(
VIN),
evaporative
emission
number,
engine
displacement,
number
of
cylinders,
emission
controls,
catalyst
type,
vehicle
registration
status,
and
fuel
and
oil
information.
Condition
of
the
motor
oil
(
e.
g.
clean
or
new
vs.
used/
dirty)
will
be
reported.
A
visual
and
odor
inspection
of
the
exhaust
will
also
be
noted
to
determine
in
advance
whether
or
not
a
vehicle
might
be
a
low
or
high
PM
emitter
or
smoker.
All
information
will
be
documented
for
each
vehicle
brought
to
the
testing
facility,
regardless
of
whether
the
vehicle
is
tested.

After
the
vehicle
has
passed
inspection,
it
shall
be
conditioned
for
testing.
Conditioning
will
occur
by
driving
the
vehicle
on
a
route
pre­
established
by
the
contractor
in
the
vicinity
of
the
testing
location.
The
conditioning
route
must
contain
multiple
high
speed
accelerations,
a
minimum
of
ten
minutes
of
continuous
high
speed
operation,
and
low
speed
operation
and
idling
just
prior
to
the
completion
of
the
conditioning
route.
After
conditioning,
the
vehicle
shall
soak
overnight
prior
to
emissions
testing
on
the
dynamometer.
Portable
activity
measurement
system
(
PAMS)
might
be
used
to
compare
conditioning
differences
between
vehicles.
Vehicles
will
be
observed
for
visible
smoke
during
vehicle
processing
and
after
the
initial
dynamometer
test.
A
test
will
be
developed
by
the
contractor
for
smoke
observation
as
part
of
the
vehicle
conditioning
process.
Based
on
observations
during
this
test,
vehicles
will
be
characterized
in
the
smoker
category
(
measured
by
color),
if
appropriate.
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Recruit
Vehicle
and
Brought
to
Test
Site
or
Picked
Up
at
Vehicle
Owner's
Home
Check
vehicle
parameters
and
store
into
equip_
in.
dbf
software
Visual
Inspection
(
video
tape
vehicle
and
sign
waivers
etc.)
Exchange
Loaner
vehicle,
if
required.

Check
vehicle
safety
(
e.
g.
tires,
fluid
levels,
brakes,
engine,
and
exhaust
system)

Are
the
tires
safe?
No
Replace
tires
Are
the
fluid
levels
proper?
Yes
No
Yes
Are
the
brakes
okay?

Fill
fluids
to
proper
levels
Yes
No
Fix
Brakes
Is
the
engine
okay?
(
major
oil/
gasoline
leaks,
etc.)
No
Fix
Leaks
Inspect
Vehicle
Is
the
vehicle
exhaust
system
okay?

Yes
Fix
Exhaust
Leaks
No
Yes
Prep
Vehicle
for
Emission
Testing
Has
the
vehicle
enough
fuel
for
testing?

Yes
Fill
Gas
Tank
No
Figure
1a
­
Vehicle
Inspection
Flow
Diagram
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
3.2.2
Vehicle
Testing
Procedures
and
Equipment
Vehicles
will
be
brought
to
the
testing
facility
randomly
for
testing
by
the
contractor.
No
predetermined
order
for
testing
should
be
incorporated.
However,
if
the
vehicle
pre­
inspection
does
indicate
that
a
vehicle
might
be
a
high
emitter
(
due
to
smoke,
smell,
etc.),
that
vehicle
shall
be
tested
last
in
the
day.
A
calibration
(
or
control)
vehicle
will
be
used
weekly
to
test
the
dynamometer
system.
The
contractor
shall
report
the
control
vehicle
weekly
results
before
beginning
the
next
week
of
vehicle
tests.
As
part
of
the
Quality
Assurance
Project
Plan
(
QAPP)
and
Quality
Management
Plan
(
QMP),
the
contractor
shall
develop
guidelines
or
standards
for
vehicle
inspections
and
testing
of
vehicles.

3.2.2.1
Dynamometer
Testing
Vehicle
exhaust
emissions
testing
will
occur
using
the
EPA
Office
of
Research
and
Development
(
ORD)
transportable
chassis
dynamometer
(
refer
to
Section
3.2).

The
contractor
shall
provide
a
cost
break
down
for
both
options
listed
below.
EPA
will
decide
during
proposal
review
which
option
to
select.

Scenario
A
­
EPA's
ORD
provides
the
dynamometer
testing
equipment,
the
contractor
operates
and
is
responsible
for
all
costs.

Scenario
B
­
EPA's
ORD
provides
the
dynamometer
testing
equipment
and
the
dynamometer's
operation
occurs
under
a
separate
contract
and
the
contractor
needs
to
coordinate
with
the
contractor
operating
the
dynamometer.

The
information
in
this
section
is
for
the
contractor's
information
only.
However,
the
contractor
awarded
this
task
order
must
ensure
that
data
collected
through
either
option
is
integrated
into
the
program.

The
EPA
dynamometer
simulates
driving
on
a
Clayton
Model
CTE­
50­
0
chassis
dynamometer.
The
dynamometer
is
capable
of
simulating
a
continuous
spectrum
of
loads
from
three
to
50
hp
@
50
mph
and
inertias
from
1750
to
3000
pounds
in
250­
pound
increments
and
3000
to
5500
pounds
in
500
pound
increments.
Cooling
fluid
for
the
dynamometer's
water
brake
power
absorption
unit
consists
of
a
50/
50
mixture
of
water
and
glycol.
The
fluid
is
recirculated
and
cooled
by
a
self­
contained
pumping
and
cooling
system.
Test
inertia
and
hp
settings
for
the
dynamometer
will
be
determined
from
computerized
EPA
I/
M
lookup
tables
and
recorded
on
the
vehicle
test
form.
Vehicles
will
be
operated
over
the
LA92
Unified
Driving
Cycle
(
shown
in
Figure
2).
The
LA92
cycle
will
consist
of
a
cold
start
Phase
1
(
first
310
seconds),
a
stabilized
Phase
2
(
311
 
1427
seconds),
a
600­
second
engine
off
soak,
and
a
warm
start
Phase
3
(
repeat
of
Phase
1
of
LA92),
PM
filter
collection
will
occur
separately
for
phase
1,
phase
2,
and
phase
3.
A
positive
displacement
pump­
constant
volume
sampling
(
PDP­
CVS)
system
will
be
used
to
quantitatively
dilute
exhaust
gas
from
the
vehicle
operating
on
the
dynamometer.
The
PDP­
CVS
system
is
constructed
of
an
8­
inch
diameter
stainless
steel
dilution
tunnel
and
a
SutorBilt
Model
GAELAPA
(
6­
LP)
PDP
operating
at
500
CFM.
Dilution
air
is
treated
with
a
charcoal
bed
(
for
HC
stabilization)
followed
by
a
HEPA
filter
(
99.97%
DOP
filter
efficiency)
to
remove
particles
prior
to
mixing
with
vehicle
exhaust.
During
transient
testing,
the
dilution
tunnel
temperature
shall
be
kept
constant
at
47
±
5
°
C
to
prevent
loss
of
volatile
PM
components
from
high
temperature
portions
of
the
driving
test
cycle
and
because
of
the
dominance
of
volatile
PM
components
from
low
temperature
portions
of
the
driving
test
cycle.
Maintenance
of
a
constant
temperature
will
also
enable
PM
instrument
sample
temperature
controls
to
operate
more
effectively.
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
LA92
Drving
Schedule
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0
37
74
111
148
185
222
259
296
333
370
407
444
481
518
555
592
629
666
703
740
777
814
851
888
925
962
999
1036
1073
1110
1147
1184
Vehicl
Figure
2.
LA92
Driving
Cycle.

As
part
of
the
tunnel
conditioning
process,
the
CVS
and
tunnel
dilution
air
heater
shall
be
turned
on
at
least
ten
(
10)
hours
prior
to
engine
start
and
run
to
purge
the
exhaust
transfer
line
and
dilution
tunnel.
Pilot
testing
results
may
indicate
that
less
than
ten
hours
is
sufficient.
Pumps
at
the
analytical
bench
shall
be
run
at
least
one
(
1)
hour
prior
to
engine
start
to
purge
all
sample
lines.
The
CVS,
tunnel
heater
and
sample
pumps
shall
be
kept
running
throughout
the
day
and
will
not
be
shut
down
until
the
conclusion
of
testing
for
that
day.
Testing
shall
not
be
started
until
the
temperature
in
the
dilution
tunnel
has
reached
a
stable
value
(
no
increase
in
temperature
over
a
3
minute
period).
Within
two
(
2)
minutes
of
the
start
of
the
initial
test
of
the
day,
background
THC,
CO,
NO
x,
and
CO
2
concentrations
in
the
dilution
tunnel
shall
be
recorded
by
the
regulated
emissions
bench
operator.
These
levels
shall
serve
as
reference
background
levels
for
the
tests
that
immediately
follow
that
day.
If
prior
to
the
start
(
within
2
minutes
of
start)
of
succeeding
tests
that
day,
the
background
levels
measured
for
that
test
differ
from
the
reference
background
by
more
than
+
15%,
testing
shall
be
delayed
until
corrective
measures
are
taken.
If
the
greater
than
+
15%
change
in
background
is
due
to
a
change
in
the
ambient
background
level
(
not
influenced
by
station
exhaust
or
spillage)
and
cannot
be
corrected,
the
testing
may
resume
with
a
new
set
of
reference
background
levels.
However,
after
each
test,
the
ambient
background
levels
shall
be
monitored
by
the
bench
operator
so
that
the
reference
background
levels
can
be
adjusted
if
ambient
levels
continue
to
change.
Background
levels
of
THC
from
the
tunnel
filter
shall
also
be
monitored
by
the
instrument
bench
operator
for
fifteen
(
15)
minutes
before
the
start
of
a
test.
If
the
background
level
of
THC
in
the
dilution
tunnel
differs
by
+
15%
of
the
background
level
of
THC
after
the
tunnel
filter,
the
test
shall
be
delayed
until
tunnel
levels
are
adjusted
accordingly.
PDP
and
ambient
temperatures
will
be
monitored
with
Type
K
thermocouples
coupled
to
Omega
readout
meters.
Relative
humidity
and
atmospheric
pressure
are
also
measured
electronically.
Vehicle
speed
will
be
measured
using
a
digital
optical
encoder
as
part
of
the
driver's
aid
system.
The
emission
measurement
system
has
the
capability
to
measure
both
continuous
and
bag
emission
measurement
for
the
following
pollutants
(
THC,
Nox,
CO
and
CO
2).
Emission
measurements
gathered
in
bags
and
processed
through
a
GC
can
be
used
as
a
QC
procedure
to
compare
to
emissions
being
measured
on
a
continuous
basis.

A
pentium
class
computer
will
be
provided
by
EPA
to
be
used
to
log
real
time
output
signals
from
the
regulated
emissions
instrumentation
and
meteorological
and
speed
sensors.
The
computer
is
equipped
with
two
A/
D
boards
(
Data
Translation
model
numbers
DT2801A
and
DT2821).
Each
A/
D
board
will
provide
eight
(
8)
differential
analog
input
channels
for
recording
data
and
sixteen
(
16)
digital
output
channels
for
control
of
sampling
solenoids.
The
real­
time
system
is
controlled
by
a
commercial
software
package,
Labtech
Notebook.
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Labtech
Notebook
is
a
menu
driven
software
package
used
to
configure
sampling
rates,
engineering
conversion
factors,
data
storage
modes,
etc.,
for
each
sampling
and
control
channel.

3.2.2.2
Vehicle
Fluid
Sampling
Fuel
and
oil
samples
will
be
collected
by
the
contractor
from
all
feasible
vehicles
after
completion
of
the
dynamometer
test(
s).
Fuel
samples
from
different
grades
will
also
be
collected
from
five
local
gasoline
distributors
to
account
for
newer
vehicles
in
which
fuel
samples
cannot
be
collected.
The
fuel
and
oil
samples
will
be
analyzed
for
sulfur
content,
aromatic
content,
elements
(
see
Section
3.3.2.7),
and
speciated
HCs
(
see
Section
3.3.2.5).
Approximately
2­
3
ounces
of
sample
will
be
collected
from
each
vehicle
to
allow
excess
sample
to
be
retained
by
the
contractor
for
a
period
of
two
(
2)
years
after
completion
of
the
task
order
for
potential
future
compositional
analysis.
If
EPA
requires
any
samples
to
be
analyzed
beyond
what
is
specified
in
section
3.3.2.7,
EPA
will
pay
for
shipping
cost
through
a
different
contract
mechanism.
Two
years
after
testing
has
been
completed,
ownership
of
samples
revert
to
the
contractor.
Disposal
of
samples
may
be
accomplished
by
taking
them
to
the
local
recycling
station.

3.2.3
Quality
Assurance
for
Vehicle
Testing
Dynamometer
calibration
checks
will
be
performed
on
a
daily
basis
through
a
combination
of
coastdowns
and
speed
calibrations.
PDP
rpm
will
also
be
checked
on
a
daily
basis.
The
dynamometer's
torque
sensor
is
calibrated
after
field
set
up
using
dead
weight
techniques.
PM
mass
and
EC
tunnel
blanks
will
be
collected
to
ensure
no
significant
background
problems
for
the
measurement
of
regulated
emissions.

Second
by
second
data
shall
be
aligned
to
vehicle
tractive
power
and
shall
be
done
through
the
testing
of
a
vehicle
over
the
test
cycle
to
be
used
in
this
test
program,
the
LA92
(
Unified
Cycle).
This
process
is
only
necessary
during
the
configuration
or
reconfiguration
of
the
sampling
system.
This
configuration
also
includes
variations
in
the
sampling
pipe
from
the
vehicle
to
the
dilution
tunnel.
Conceivably,
different
sampling
pipes
will
require
different
alignment
values.
Using
parameters
for
light
duty
vehicles
on
a
flat
(
zero
grade)
roadway
this
equation
can
use
the
following
form:

VSP
(
kW/
metric
Ton)
=
1.04*
v*
a+
0.132*
v+
00.00121*
v^
3;

where
v
is
in
units
of
m/
s
and
a
in
m/
s/
s.
This
assumes
a
value
for
rolling
resistance,
aerodynamic
drag,
vehicle
mass,
engine
efficiency
(
the
1.04
coefficient
of
the
v*
a
term),
etc.,
which
will
vary
from
vehicle
to
vehicle.
However,
this
is
sufficient
because
only
timing
is
being
considered.
The
contractor
shall
correlate
all
the
gases
to
VSP;
this
is
done
any
time
that
there
is
a
change
in
the
plumbing
or
instrumentation.
The
best
correlation
between
each
gas
and
VSP
shall
be
determined
by
shifting
the
emission
results
in
relation
to
VSP.
The
time
shift
for
individual
analyses
shall
be
the
offset
used
between
vehicle's
speed
and
its
corresponding
emissions.
For
the
field
testing,
round­
robin
comparisons
will
be
made
between
the
transportable
dynamometer
in
Kansas
City
(
ORD's
transportable
dynamometer)
and
the
EPA
laboratory
dynamometers
in
Ann
Arbor,
MI.
Three
vehicles
will
be
tested
at
the
Ann
Arbor
labs
(
each
vehicle
tested
in
triplicate)
and
shipped
to
Kansas
City
for
testing
on
the
transportable
dynamometer.
The
types
of
vehicles
might
include
a
new,
low
mileage
vehicle;
an
intermediate
mileage
vehicle
(
approximately
50,000
miles);
and
a
high
mileage,
high
emitting
vehicle.
The
contractor
shall
be
responsible
for
arranging
for
testing
and
conducting
sample
analyses
in
Kansas
City
and
vehicle
shipment
to
and
from
Ann
Arbor,
MI.
The
contractor
will
also
be
responsible
for
doing
sample
analyses
for
the
Ann
Arbor
samples.
EPA
will
provide
the
vehicles
for
the
contractor
to
use
during
this
test
program.
As
another
possible
QA
procedure,
all
vehicles
shall
pass
by
a
remote
sensing
device
multiple
times.
The
contractor
can
choose
to
conduct
this
testing
during
the
preconditioning
route
or
after
emissions
testing
on
the
dynamometer.
The
data
will
be
used
to
compare
with
the
other
continuous
emission
monitoring
devices
(
PEMS
units
and
the
dilution
tunnel
measurements).
The
data
may
also
be
used
to
determine
the
representativeness
of
the
vehicle
in
relation
to
the
Kansas
City
regional
fleet
for
HC,
CO,
and
NO
x
emissions.
Twenty­
five
vehicles
tested
during
Round
1
of
the
program
will
be
re­
tested
during
Round
2
to
determine
comparability
between
testing
Rounds.
These
vehicles
will
be
randomly
selected
from
each
stratum
as
shown
in
Table
5.
This
data
may
also
provide
information
on
the
effect
of
ambient
temperature
on
PM
emissions.
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Table
5.
Estimated
Sample
Sizes
by
Stratum
for
Round
2
Re­
Testing
Stratum
(
h)
Vehicle
Class
Age
Class
Sample
size
(
nh)
1
1
Truck
Pre
1980
3
2
Truck
1980­
1990
5
3
Truck
1991­
1995
3
4
Truck
1996
and
newer
2
5
Car
Pre
1980
2
6
Car
1980
 
1990
3
7
Car
1991­
1995
4
8
Car
1996
and
newer
3
Total
25
1
Number
of
randomly
selected
vehicles
tested
during
Round
1
re­
tested
during
Round
2.

3.2.4
PEMS
and
PAMS
Vehicle
Testing.
To
advance
the
Sponsors'
understanding
of
"
real
world"
vehicle
operations
and
emissions
and
to
create
realistic
airshed
models
of
mobile
sources,
the
contractors
shall
install
PEMS
and
PAMS
units
on
randomly
selected
vehicles.
EPA
will
provide
technical
information
on
which
vehicles
will
receive
the
PEMS
and
PAMS
units
(
see
Appendix
C
as
a
reference
users
manual
of
a
typical
PEMS
type
unit).
EPA
will
be
looking
for
a
mixture
of
vehicles
as
specified
in
Table
5
and
will
also
target
vehicles
based
on
their
emission
rates
and
mileage.
These
devices
can
record
measurements
on
a
second­
by­
second
basis
in
the
following
areas:
environmental
conditions
(
e.
g.,
ambient
temperature,
humidity,
barometric
pressure,
etc),
vehicle
parameters
(
engine
rpm,
vehicle
speed,
air
conditioning
on,
OBD
codes,
etc),
date/
time
stamp,
and
emissions
(
HC,
NOx,
CO
and
CO
2).
PEMS
has
the
capability
to
operate
from
battery
only
for
8
hours
or
for
16
hours
with
two
batteries.
For
multiple
day
data
gathering
would
require
the
recharging
of
batteries
which
can
occur
two
ways:
recharging
by
electrical
outlet
overnight
or
from
the
vehicle's
electrical
system
during
vehicle
normal
operating.
Fuel
to
operate
the
FID
analyzer
lasts
for
8
hours
of
continuous
operation.
The
PEMS
and
PAMS
devices
will
be
installed
into
the
owner's
vehicle
trunk
either
at
the
testing
facility
or
at
the
owner's
home.
Installation
and
removal
requires
about
one
hour
which
includes
calibration,
quality
assuring
and
quality
controlling
(
QA/
QC)
the
equipment.
All
calibrations
and
QA/
QC
procedures
shall
be
recorded
and
documented
for
each
vehicle.
EPA
expects
that
10
 
20%
of
the
vehicle's
might
require
an
additional
hour
because
of
either
installation
or
calibration
issues.
After
installing
the
PEMS/
PAMS
device,
the
vehicle
owner
operates
the
vehicle
in
a
normal
fashion
that
would
be
typical
for
that
day(
s).
The
owner
will
be
required
to
record
in
a
log
a
date
and
time
that
certain
events
occurred
such
as
changes
in
the
vehicle's
load
(
e.
g.,
number
of
passengers
in
vehicle
entered
and
left
the
vehicle
or
other
items
such
as
groceries
or
packages,
etc).
Installation
and
removal
of
the
PEMS/
PAMS
equipment
can
occur
at
either
the
vehicle
emission
test
site
or
at
the
vehicle
owner's
home.
The
contractor
shall
provide
a
strategy
for
testing
vehicles
using
PEMS/
PAMS
devices.

Table
6.
Use
of
PEMS
and
PAMS
Devices.

Type
of
Device
Number
of
Days
Number
of
Vehicles
Round
1
Round
2
PEMS
1­
3
20
per
device
(
16
vehicles
per
week)
20
per
device
(
16
vehicles
per
week)
PAMS
1­
7
10
 
12
per
device
(
1
vehicle
per
week)
10­
12
per
device
(
1
vehicle
per
week)

EPA
plans
on
using
up
to
eight
PEMS/
PAMS
devices
(
depending
on
which
device
types
are
available
at
the
time
of
testing)
on
the
recruited
vehicles
to
gather
either
activity
or
both
activity
and
emissions
data
during
the
timeframe
specified
above.
EPA
will
provide
the
equipment
and
training
in
Kansas
City
at
no
cost
to
the
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
contractor.
PEMs
devices
will
be
on
the
vehicle
for
an
average
of
three
days
with
some
vehicles
being
repeated
to
look
at
the
difference
between
weekday
and
weekend
driving
habits.
The
maximum
amount
of
data
that
would
be
gathered
is
between
6
­
20
hours
with
a
typical
data
set
consisting
of
about
2
­
6
hours.
PEMS
devices
will
only
be
used
in
vehicles
that
will
be
operated
for
at
least
an
hour
on
that
day.
The
contractor
will
be
responsible
for
the
installation,
removal
of
instrumentation
from
the
vehicle,
equipment
calibration
and
maintenance,
data
storage,
maintaining
Quality
Assurance
Project
Plan
(
QAPP)
and
Quality
Management
Plan
(
QMP)
procedures
and
data
format
conversion
(
if
needed).
The
contractor
will
perform
a
PEMS
evaluation
comparing
second­
by­
second
data
between
the
dynamometer
and
"
real­
world"
for
each
vehicle.
The
contractor
might
need
to
provide
additional
incentives
to
owners
who
are
selected
to
have
one
of
these
devices
installed.
PAMS
devices
will
be
used
to
gather
"
real
world"
activity
of
a
vehicle
so
there
will
be
no
minimum
amount
of
vehicle
use
required.
The
contractor
shall
also
price
the
cost
of
operating
PEMS
on
a
per
vehicle
basis.

3.2.5
Data
Management.
The
contractor
shall
maintain
and
provide
the
EPA's
Project
Officer
and
all
Sponsors
with
all
records
associated
with
vehicle
inspection,
maintenance,
and
testing.
All
vehicle
identifiers
shall
coincide
with
the
identifiers
used
for
vehicle
recruitment.
Data
must
be
collected
for
all
vehicles
recruited
to
the
project,
even
if
the
vehicle
is
not
tested.
Data
shall
be
delivered
in
the
input
formats
for
EPA's
relational
database
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Base
(
MSOD).
The
formats
are
described
and
defined
in
Attachment
A.
1.
Delivered
tables
shall
be
accurate
and
complete
before
they
are
forwarded
to
the
Sponsors.
Any
time
a
significant
change
or
changes
to
the
test
program
or
its
software
are
adopted,
the
contractor
shall
again
perform
a
complete
comparison
of
the
data
from
the
first
affected
test
vehicle
to
the
.
dbf
data
tables
generated
for
that
vehicle
(
See
section
4.2
for
further
data
management
issues).

3.3.
Sample
Analysis.
Chemical
and
physical
analyses
of
the
samples
collected
during
vehicle
testing
will
be
required
to
support
the
study.
Results
from
the
chemical
and
physical
characterization
of
the
exhaust
emissions
will
provide
information
for
the
SPECIATE
emission
factor
database,
profiles
for
source
apportionment
studies,
and
air
toxics
emission
estimates
for
trends
assessments.
Table
7
lists
the
number
of
samples
that
need
to
be
collected.
The
contractor
shall
assume
that
no
compositing
of
samples
will
be
required.
However,
results
of
the
pilot
study
may
indicate
that
sample
compositing
is
required.
The
contractor
shall
develop
as
part
of
the
QAPP,
a
methodology
for
regularly
transferring
and
review
of
all
data
streams
within
this
project.
Not
all
samples
will
be
analyzed,
so
the
contractor
shall
propose
one
or
more
statistical
approaches
to
choose
samples
to
be
analyzed
to
meet
budget
limitations.
Compound
analyses
shall
be
conducted
in
a
timely
manner
to
ensure
the
integrity
of
the
sample
collected.
The
contractor
shall
specify
the
time
between
sample
collection
and
analysis
and
the
anticipated
recovery
rate
for
volatile
species.
EPA
recognizes
that
results
of
the
project
may
be
used
to
develop
source
apportionment
profiles.
Contractors
may
compare
these
profiles
with
previous
studies.
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Table
7.
The
number
of
samples
to
be
collected
for
each
testing
Round.

Type
of
Sample
#
of
vehicles
LA92
Cycles
#
of
samples
per
cycle
#
of
bkgnd
per
cycle
Total
Integrated
Samples
PM
Mass
Filters
277
1
3
1
1108
Elements
Filters
265
1
0
0
0
EC/
OC
Filters
277
1
3(*)
1
1108
Ion
Filters
265
1
1
0
265
SVOC
PUF
or
denuder
&
filters
265
1
1
0
265
VOC
summa
canisters
265
1
1
0
265
Aldehyde
DNPH
cartridges
265
1
1
0
265
Continuous
Sample
Periods
QCM
277
1
1
1
554
TEOM
(
Continuous/
Integrated)
277
1
2
(
LA92
phase
1
&
3
only)
2
1108
EC
277
1
1
1
554
Nephelometer
277
1
1
1
554
a
The
contractor
may
use
the
PM
mass
filter
for
the
elements
analysis
after
weighing
for
mass.
*
EC/
OC
testing
requires
two,
back­
to­
back
quartz
filters
for
each
sample.
The
backup
filter
is
accounted
for
as
a
dynamic
filter
blank
listed
in
Table
8.

Measurement
methods
to
be
used
in
this
project
include
continuous
air
monitoring,
integrated
air
sampling,
and
vehicle
fluid
grab
sampling.
Continuous
methods
for
measurement
of
fine
particle
mass
provide
several
useful
data
products
as
well
as
immediate
feedback
about
the
nature
of
the
emissions
from
vehicles.
These
methods
are
ideally
suited
to
identify
the
portions
of
a
driving
cycle
where
particulate
emissions
are
greatest
and
least.
Rapid
time
response
is
also
useful
for
identifying
potential
high
emitting
vehicles
and
determining
the
conditioning
status
of
the
dilution
tunnel.
The
integrated
measurements
allow
for
detailed
analysis
of
chemical
components
present
in
the
vehicle's
exhaust
for
which
no
continuous
methods
exist.
Grab
samples
will
be
used
to
identify
the
composition
of
the
fuel
and
oil
used
in
each
vehicle
during
testing
to
assess
potential
mass
balance
relationships
for
specific
compound
emissions.
PM
continuous
and
integrated
air
measurements
will
be
extracted
from
the
dilution
tunnel
through
a
low
particulate
loss
2.5
um
cut
point
pre­
classifier.
The
sample
shall
be
isokinetically
partitioned
among
the
sample
and
direct
measurement
instruments
using
a
sample
distribution
manifold.
Throughout
the
sample
extraction
and
partition
process,
the
temperature
of
the
sample
air
just
before
the
PM
filter
shall
be
maintained
at
47
±
5
°
C
to
ensure
that
PM
sample
loss
due
to
thermophoresis
is
kept
to
a
minimum.
Sample
transport
from
the
partitioning
system
to
the
individual
instruments
and
sample
collection
fixtures
shall
be
through
straight,
short
transport
lines.
These
lines
shall
be
heated
to
maintain
sample
temperature.
This
will
ensure
that
PM
sample
loss
due
to
diffusion
and
thermophoresis
is
kept
to
a
minimum.
Sample
transport
lines
shall
also
be
of
comparable
length.
EPA
will
be
providing
equipment
for
some
of
the
testing
to
be
performed
(
see
Appendix
D).
The
contractor
can
also
submit
alternative
equipment
that
they
feel
is
as
good
or
better
than
what
is
provided
by
EPA.
The
contractor
shall
justify
the
use,
accuracy
and
cost
of
such
equipment
so
that
a
proper
evaluation
can
be
conducted.
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
3.3.1
Continuous
Measurements.
Continuous
measurements
will
be
collected
for
PM
2.5
(
mass
and
elemental
carbon
(
EC))
and
gaseous
compounds
(
NOx,
THC,
CO
2,
and
CO).
Each
method
provides
useful
information
on
the
amount
and
composition
of
PM
and
gaseous
emissions
from
motor
vehicles.
The
contractor
will
be
required
to
diligently
monitor
this
equipment.
Operating
methods
must
be
approved
by
the
EPA's
Project
Officer
through
the
Quality
Assurance
Project
Plan
(
QAPP)
described
in
Task
1.
Each
of
the
continuous
measurement
instruments
has
its
own
sample
environment
control.
These
include
control
of
sample
temperature
and,
in
the
case
of
the
TEOM,
compensation
for
changes
in
sample
air
pressure.
In
addition,
to
ensure
that
sample
water
gain
during
the
gravimetric
analysis
is
compensated
for
in
the
continuous,
real­
time
measurements,
sample
dew
point
for
the
continuous
instruments
should
be
controlled
to
maintain
equivalent
partial
pressures
for
water.

3.3.1.1
PM2.5
Mass.
For
continuous
PM
2.5
mass
measurements,
three
methods
will
be
deployed:
a
quartz
crystal
microbalance
(
QCM),
a
tapered
element
oscillating
microbalance
(
TEOM),
and
a
nephelometer.
The
QCM
and
TEOM
records
and
reports
total
collected
mass
(
µ
g)
and
average
concentration
(
µ
g/
m3)
measured
during
the
specified
collection
period.
The
nephelometer
reports
a
derived
mass
concentration
(
µ
g/
m3).
Training
for
operating
the
QCM
will
be
available
to
the
contractor
at
no
cost
with
the
exception
of
travel.
The
training
will
occur
in
Kansas
City,
depending
on
the
contractor's
preference.

3.3.1.2
"
Elemental"
Carbon
(
EC).
EC
concentrations
(
µ
gC/
m3)
will
be
continuously
measured
using
an
AethalometerTM,
the
Desert
Research
Institute
(
DRI)
Photoacoustic
Sampler,
or
an
equivalent
method.
The
instrument
chosen
should
have
a
minimum
resolution
of
1
second
or
less;
although
the
contractor
may
suggest
a
higher
setting
to
increase
the
sensitivity
of
the
measurement.
The
contractor
can
submit
alternative
equipment
to
be
used
to
measure
particulates,
however,
the
equipment
needs
to
have
the
ability
to
perform
high
time
resolution
measurements
so
that
we
can
understand
the
relationship
between
activity
and
emission
characteristics.

3.3.1.3
Continuous
Gaseous
Compound
Measurements
(
see
section
3.2.2.1
scenarios)
The
measurements
listed
in
this
section
will
be
provided
under
separate
contract
if
Scenario
B
is
chosen.
The
contractor
for
this
RFP
must
ensure
that
the
data
described
in
this
section
are
integrated
into
this
program.
In
addition
to
PM
collection,
the
EPA
transportable
dynamometer
has
a
bench
capability
to
measure
total
hydrocarbons,
oxides
of
nitrogen
and
carbon
monoxide.
Total
hydrocarbons
(
THC)
will
be
analyzed
with
a
Horiba
model
236­
Heated
Flame
Ionization
Detector
(
HFID).
Background
THC
will
be
monitored
with
a
second
HFID,
a
Horiba
model
FIA
34A.
Oxides
of
nitrogen
(
NOx)
will
be
analyzed
with
a
Horiba
Model
CLA­
220
Chemiluminescent
instrument.
Carbon
monoxide
and
carbon
dioxide
will
be
analyzed
with
Horiba
Model
AIA­
210/
220
infrared
(
IR)
instruments.
A
third
IR
instrument,
a
Horiba
model
AIA23­
AS,
will
be
used
for
analysis
of
low
(<
1000
ppm)
carbon
monoxide
concentrations.
All
six
instruments
are
rack
mounted
and
plumbed
for
introduction
of
zero,
span,
and
sample
gases
through
the
use
of
solenoid
valves
and
pushbutton
controls.

3.3.2
Integrated
PM
and
Gaseous
Compound
Analyses.
Integrated
PM
and
gas
samples
will
be
collected
to
allow
for
detailed
chemical
characterization
of
exhaust
components.
Integrated
samples
for
PM
2.5
mass,
elements,
EC/
OC,
ions,
SVOCs,
and
gaseous
air
toxics
will
be
collected.
All
analysis
extraction
and
measurement
methods
must
be
approved
by
the
EPA's
Project
Officer
through
the
QAPP.
Filters
will
require
treatment
and
representative
chemical
analyses
before
being
used
in
the
study.
A
minimum
of
two
filters
from
each
lot
received
from
the
manufacturers
will
be
analyzed
for
species
to
verify
that
specifications
established
in
the
QAPP
have
been
met.
Lots
will
be
rejected
if
they
do
not
pass
this
acceptance
test.
All
filters
will
be
individually
examined
over
a
light
table
prior
to
use
for
discoloration,
pinholes,
creases,
or
other
defects.
In
addition
to
laboratory
blanks,
10%
of
all
samples
will
be
designated
as
field
blanks
that
follow
all
handling
procedures,
but
do
not
undergo
actual
sampling.
Duplicate
laboratory
analysis
will
be
conducted
for
every
10
samples.
Study
protocols
call
for
10%
replicate
analyses.
These
are
an
important
part
of
the
QA/
QC
program
since
these
are
applied
to
determine
replicate
precision
that
allow
for
calculation
of
sample
uncertainty.
Table
8
lists
the
anticipated
number
of
blanks
to
be
evaluated
for
the
project.
The
numbers
in
Table
8
assume
that
tunnel
blanks
are
collected
at
the
end
of
the
test
day,
before
the
start
of
the
test
day,
and
between
each
test
for
PM
mass
and
EC.
Ten
percent
of
all
samples
will
have
associated
field
and
analytical
blanks,
while
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
three
transportation
blanks
are
evaluated
for
each
shipment
(
numbers
assume
one
shipment
of
samples
occurs
each
week).
Not
all
samples
will
be
analyzed,
so
the
contractor
shall
propose
one
or
more
statistical
approaches
to
choose
samples
to
be
analyzed
to
improve
cost
effectiveness.
Compound
analyses
shall
be
conducted
in
a
timely
manner
to
insure
the
integrity
of
the
sample
collected.
The
contractor
shall
specify
the
time
between
sample
collection
and
analysis
and
the
anticipated
recovery
rate
for
volatile
species.

Table
8.
Estimated
number
of
blanks
to
be
analyzed
during
each
testing
Round.

Type
of
Sample
Tunnel
Blanks
Sample/
Field
Blanks
Analytical
Blanks
Transport
Blanks
Total
Integrated
Sample
PM
Mass
Filters
332
144
144
36
656
Elements
Filters
*
0
27
27
36
90
EC/
OC
Filters
*
332
1440
144
36
1952
Ion
Filters
0
27
27
36
90
SVOC
PUF
or
denuder
&
filters
0
27
27
36
90
VOC
summa
canisters
0
27
27
0
90
Aldehyde
DNPH
cartridges
0
27
27
36
90
Continuous
Sample
Periods
QCM
332
332**
*
n/
a
664
TEOM
(
Continuous/
Integrated)
332
332**
*
n/
a
664
EC
332
332**
*
n/
a
664
Nephelometer
332
332**
*
n/
a
664
THC
332
332**
*
n/
a
664
*
The
contractor
may
use
the
PM
mass
filter
for
the
elements
analysis
after
weighing
for
Mass.
**
Using
humidified
Zero
Air.
*
Field
and
analytical
blanks
are
the
same.

In
addition
to
acceptance
testing,
some
filters
will
require
pre­
treatment
before
sampling.
Quartz­
fiber
filters
may
absorb
organic
vapors
with
time.
Blank
quartz­
fiber
filters
used
for
the
assessment
of
EC/
OC
will
be
heated
in
air
for
at
least
three
hours
at
~
900
°
C
prior
to
acceptance
testing
analysis.
Sets
of
filters
with
levels
exceeding
1.5
ug/
cm2
for
organic
carbon
and
0.5
ug/
cm2
for
elemental
carbon
will
be
re­
fired
or
rejected.
Pre­
fired
filters
will
be
sealed
and
stored
in
a
freezer
at
­
20
°
C
prior
to
preparation
for
field
sampling.
The
results
of
the
laboratory
filter
treatments,
chemical
analyses,
and
visual
inspections
will
be
recorded
in
a
database
with
the
lot
numbers
as
described
in
the
data
management
section.
A
set
of
filter
IDs
will
be
assigned
to
each
lot
so
that
a
record
of
acceptance
testing
can
be
associated
with
each
sample.

3.3.2.1
PM2.5
Mass.
PM
2.5
mass
measurements
will
be
determined
gravimetrically
by
the
collection
of
particulates
on
Teflon
membrane
filters.
One
filter
will
be
used
to
collect
LA92
Phase
1,
cold
start
emissions,
a
second
filter
collecting
emissions
from
LA92
Phase
2,
and
a
third
filter
for
Phase
3
for
every
vehicle
tested.
Phase
4
of
the
LA92
will
not
be
run
for
this
program.
Unexposed
and
exposed
Teflon­
membrane
filters
will
be
used
for
gravimetric
analysis.
The
filters
will
be
equilibrated
at
a
temperature
of
20
±
5
°
C
and
a
relative
humidity
of
30
±
5%
for
a
minimum
of
24
hours
prior
to
weighing.
Weighing
shall
be
performed
on
a
microbalance
with
±
0.0001
mg
sensitivity.
The
charge
on
each
filter
shall
be
neutralized
by
exposure
to
a
polonium
source
for
30
seconds
prior
to
the
filter
being
placed
on
the
balance
pan.
The
balance
operator
shall
also
be
grounded
during
filter
measurement.
Pre­
and
post­
weights,
check
weights,
and
re­
weights
(
if
required)
will
be
recorded
as
described
in
the
data
management
section.
All
Teflon
filters
will
be
analyzed
for
mass.
If
practical,
PM
mass
measurements
should
be
conducted
on­
site.
If
on­
site
measurements
are
not
feasible,
shipping
and
handling
of
the
filters
should
be
minimized
to
the
extent
possible.
All
filters
should
only
be
handled
in
a
clean
room
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
environment.
The
contractor
shall
minimize
the
amount
of
handling
PM
filters
(
one
method
for
minimizing
the
handling
by
the
use
of
cassettes).
The
contractor
might
need
to
use
TX40
filters
for
some
high
PM
emitting
vehicles
in
order
to
capture
these
emissions.
A
preferred
standard
for
a
clean
room
to
measure
PM
filters
is
"
Class
1000"
standard
and
a
balance
that
can
record
to
a
0.1
microgram.
The
contractor
can
propose
another
system
or
equipment
but
will
need
to
show
justification
for
its
use.

3.3.2.2
Elements
Analysis.
Chemical
analyses
will
be
performed
on
select
Teflon­
membrane
filter
samples
that
were
collected
for
the
PM
2.5
mass
measurements.
The
contractor
may
also
suggest
collecting
elements
samples
on
separate
filters.
At
a
minimum,
the
following
elements
will
be
measured
for
these
samples:
S,
Cl,
Cr,
Calcium,
Silicon,
Phosphorous,
Boron,
Na,
Al,
Copper,
Iron,
Mn,
Ni,
Zn,
As,
Hg
and
Pb.
The
contractor
must
demonstrate
minimum
detection
limits
using
proposed
analytical
methods.
The
contractor
may
also
recommend
additional
elements
to
be
measured
based
on
the
objectives
of
the
program
and
the
measurement
methods
proposed.
The
additional
elements
listed
above
were
important
ones
that
came
from
the
lube
oil
Comparative
Toxicity
Study.
Not
all
samples
will
be
analyzed,
so
the
contractor
shall
propose
one
or
more
statistical
approaches
for
choosing
samples
to
be
analyzed
to
improve
cost
effectiveness.

3.3.2.3
Elemental/
Organic
Carbon
Analysis.
The
thermal/
optical
reflectance
(
TOR)
or
thermal/
optical
transmittance
(
TOT)
methods
may
be
used
to
measure
organic
(
OC)
and
elemental
(
EC)
carbon.
EC
and
OC
will
be
measured
using
the
pre­
fired
quartz
fiber
filters.
The
contractor
shall
conduct
the
EC/
OC
measurements
using
one
of
the
two
temperature
protocols:
1)
the
IMPROVE
temperature/
oxygen
cycle,
or
2)
the
NIOSH
5040
temperature/
oxygen
cycle.
The
contractor
shall
also
provide
a
cost
estimate
of
running
both
temperature
protocols
on
a
single
instrument.
Not
all
samples
will
be
analyzed,
so
the
contractor
shall
propose
one
or
more
statistical
approaches
for
choosing
samples
to
be
analyzed
to
improve
cost
effectiveness.

3.3.2.4
Ion
Analysis.
Ion
chromatography
(
IC)
or
an
equivalent
method
will
be
used
to
measure
water­
soluble
chloride
(
Cl­),
nitrate
(
NO
3
­),
and
sulfate
(
SO
4
=).

3.3.2.5
Fine
Particles/
Semi­
Volatile
Organic
Compounds.
Organic
compound
samples
will
be
analyzed
by
gas
chromatography/
mass
spectrometry
(
GC/
MS).
XAD
coated
teflon­
impregnated
glass
fiber
filters
and
glass
honeycomb
denuders
or
polyurethane
foam
(
PUF)
cartridges
are
recommended
to
collect
samples
for
speciated
SVOC
measurements.
The
number
of
filters
and
denuders
required
to
prevent
sample
loss
will
be
determined
by
the
contractor,
and
validated
during
the
pilot
study.
At
a
minimum,
the
contractor
shall
measure
the
SVOC
compounds
listed
in
Table
12.
The
contractor
should
also
recommend
additional
compounds,
including
methyl­
and
nitro­
substituted
PAHs,
to
be
measured
based
on
the
objectives
of
the
program
and
the
measurement
methods
proposed.
Compound
analyses
shall
be
conducted
in
a
timely
manner
to
ensure
the
integrity
of
the
sample
collected.
The
contractor
shall
specify
the
time
between
sample
collection
and
analysis
and
the
anticipated
recovery
rate
for
volatile
species.

3.3.2.6
Gaseous
Air
Toxics.
Gaseous
air
toxic
compounds
will
be
collected
by
Summa
canisters
(
for
VOCs)
or
DNPH
cartridges
(
for
aldehydes
and
ketones).
At
a
minimum,
the
contractor
shall
measure
benzene,
formaldehyde,
acetaldehyde,
1,3­
butadiene,
acrolein,
toluene,
ethylbenzene,
xylenes
(
p­,
o­,
and
m­),
styrene,
n­
hexane,
napthalene,
and
MTBE.
Compound
analyses
shall
be
conducted
in
a
timely
manner
to
ensure
the
integrity
of
the
sample
collected.
The
contractor
shall
specify
the
time
between
sample
collection
and
analysis
and
the
anticipated
recovery
rate
for
volatile
species.

3.3.2.7
Fuel
and
Oil
Analysis.
Fuel
and
oil
samples
will
be
collected
from
each
vehicle
and
will
be
retained
by
the
contractor
for
a
period
of
two
(
2)
year
after
completion
of
the
task
order
for
potential
future
compositional
analysis.
If
EPA
requires
any
samples
to
be
analyzed
beyond
what
is
specified
here,
EPA
will
pay
for
shipping
cost
through
a
different
contract
mechanism.
Two
years
after
testing
has
been
completed,
ownership
of
samples
revert
to
the
contractor.
At
a
minimum,
the
following
elements
will
be
measured
for
these
samples:
S,
Cl,
Cr,
Ca,
Si,
K,
B,
Na,
Al,
Cu,
Fe,
Mn,
Ni,
Zn,
As,
Hg
and
Pb.
The
contractor
must
demonstrate
minimum
detection
limits
using
proposed
analytical
methods.
The
contractor
may
also
recommend
additional
elements
to
be
measured
based
on
the
objectives
of
the
program
and
the
measurement
methods
proposed.
The
additional
elements
listed
above
were
important
ones
that
came
from
our
Comparative
Toxicity
Study
in
lube
oil.
One
hundred
(
100)
fuel
and
oil
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
samples
will
be
selected
by
the
Project
Officer
to
be
analyzed.
Tables
9
and
10
show
analyses
to
be
performed
for
fuel
and
oil
samples,
respectively.
Disposal
of
samples
may
be
accomplished
by
taking
them
to
the
local
recycling
station.
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Table
9.
Fuel
Sample
Analyses.

Test
Method
Gravity,
API
ASTM
D4052
Density,
kg/
l
ASTM
D4052
Reid
Vapor
Pressure,
psi
ASTM
D323
Sulfur,
Wt
%
ASTM
D4294
Recovery,
vol
%

Benzene,
vol
%

Oxygenate,
vol
%
(
identify
compound(
s))
T50
T90
Residue,
vol
%

Loss,
vol
%

Oxygen,
wt
%
ASTM
D4615
Composition,
Aromatics,
vol
%
ASTM
D1319
Composition,
Oelfins,
vol
%
ASTM
D1319
Composition,
Saturates,
vol
%
ASTM
D1319
Carbon,
wt
fraction
ASTM
E191
Hydrogen,
wt
fraction
ASTM
E191
Hydrogen/
Carbon
ratio
ASTM
E191
Research
Octane
Number
ASTM
D2699
Iron,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Copper,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Tin,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Aluminum,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Boron,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Calcium,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Chloride,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Sulfur,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
As,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Cr,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Phosphorous,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Silicon,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Nickel,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Lead,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Magnesium,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Sodium,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Zinc,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Water,
%
(
Karl
Fisher)
ASTM
D4926
Motor
Octane
Number
ASTM
D2700
Fuel
Economy
Number/
C
Density
ASTM
E191
C
Factor
ASTM
E191
Net
heating
Value,
btu/
lb
ASTM
D3338
or
D240
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Table
10.
Oil
Sample
Analyses
Test
Method
Sulfur
Content
ASTM
D4294­
90
Viscosity,
cST
40
°
C,
kinematic
ASTM
D445
Wear
Particles,
Total
Ferrous
Particles
ISO
4405
Iron,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Copper,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Tin,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Aluminum,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Boron,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Calcium,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Chloride,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Sulfur,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
As,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Cr,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Phosphorous,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Silicon,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Nickel,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Lead,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Magnesium,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Sodium,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Zinc,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
Water,
%
(
Karl
Fisher)
ASTM
D4926
Glycol
Infrared
Analysis
FT­
IR
Total
Acid
Number,
mg
KOH/
g
ASTM
D664
Chromium,
ppm
Elemental
Analysis
3.3.3
Quality
Assurance
and
Quality
Control
Procedures
for
Equipment.
The
contractor
will
follow
and
ensure
quality
assurance
and
quality
control
procedures
described
below
and
throughout
this
statement
of
work
are
performed.

°
Daily
instrument
blank.
An
appropriate
blank
will
be
run
daily
for
each
instrument.
Generally
this
is
run
after
the
calibration
check
and
before
any
samples
are
analyzed.
This
confirms
that
there
is
no
carryover
from
the
calibration
check
as
well
as
confirming
the
blank
or
zero
level
of
the
instrument.
°
Daily
calibration.
All
instruments
to
be
used
in
this
study
will
have
calibration
checks
run
a
minimum
of
once
each
day.
These
checks
will
confirm
both
response
factors
and
retention
times
for
both
GC/
MS
analyses.
°
Duplicate
laboratory
analysis
for
every
10
samples.
Study
protocols
call
for
10%
replicate
analyses.
These
are
an
important
part
of
the
QA/
QC
program
since
these
are
applied
to
determine
replicate
precision
that
allow
for
calculation
of
sample
uncertainty.
°
Control
samples.
The
contractor
shall
analyze
a
variety
of
control
samples
for
QA/
QC
purposes.
These
include
calibration,
replicate,
collocated
and
blind
QA
samples.
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
°
Recovery
tests
for
selected
analytes.
Recoveries
are
determined
within
each
sample
by
the
addition
of
deuterated
internal
standards
prior
to
extraction.
For
DNPH
analyses
internal
standards
will
also
be
added.
°
Determine
and
report
minimum
trapping
efficiency.
True
measures
of
trapping
efficiency
are
nearly
impossible
to
determine
due
to
the
challenge
of
generating
an
appropriate
standard
stream
of
the
analyte
of
interest.
A
more
appropriate
method
is
the
use
of
backup
traps
to
confirm
that
no
quantifiable
levels
of
compounds
are
getting
through
the
first
trap.
°
Determine
THC,
CO,
CO
2,
NOx
and
PM
from
the
control
vehicle
every
week.
This
is
done
to
determine
if
there
is
no
drift
in
the
dynamometer.

As
stated,
a
number
of
filter
blanks
will
be
evaluated
to
ensure
quality
control.
Three
laboratory
control
blanks
will
be
evaluated
for
each
filter
lot
group
to
ensure
accuracy
of
the
laboratory
measurement
technique.
In
addition,
a
minimum
of
one
transport
and
one
field
blank
will
be
included
with
each
shipment
of
filters
for
analysis.
The
transport
blank
will
be
shipped
with
each
filter
group,
but
not
be
removed
from
the
shipping
containers.
The
field
blank
will
be
removed
from
the
shipping
container,
and
loaded
into
filter
packs,
but
not
be
subject
to
sampling.
In
addition,
daily,
dynamic
tunnel
blanks
for
PM
mass
and
EC
will
be
collected
as
described
in
the
Vehicle
Testing
section.
(
The
following
paragraph
is
required
for
both
scenarios
as
specified
in
section
3.2.2.1)
Under
separate
task
order,
regulated
emission
analysis
instrumentation
will
be
zeroed
and
spanned
before
each
test.
Calibration
gases
consisting
of
a
NO
in
Nitrogen
mixture
(
90.2
PPM
NO)
and
a
CO,
CO
2,
and
Propane
in
air
mixture
(
900
PPM
CO,
300
PPM
Propane,
and
2.54
%
CO
2)
were
obtained
from
National
Welders.
Cylinder
concentrations
will
be
verified
through
comparison
to
NIST
standards.
Zero
air
and
the
FID
fuel
(
60%
H2/
40%
He)
will
be
obtained.
CEM
zero
air
is
used
with
a
certification
of
<
0.5
PPM
CO,
<
1
PPM
CO
2,
and
<
0.1
PPM
HC.
Multipoint
calibrations
are
performed
on
all
of
the
regulated
emissions
analyzers
after
arrival
in
the
field
to
confirm
their
linearity.
A
quality
control
standard
and
a
replicate
from
a
previous
batch
will
be
analyzed
by
the
contractor
with
each
set
of
10
samples.
When
a
quality
control
value
differs
from
specifications
by
more
than
±
5%
or
when
a
replicate
concentration
differs
from
the
original
value
(
when
values
exceed
10
times
the
detection
limits)
by
more
than
±
10%,
the
samples
will
be
re­
analyzed.
If
further
tests
of
standards
show
that
the
system
calibration
has
changed
by
more
than
±
2%,
the
instrument
will
be
re­
calibrated.
All
results
will
be
recorded
as
described
in
the
data
management
section.

3.3.4
Data
Management.
All
sample
analysis
data
shall
be
provided
to
the
EPA's
Project
Officer.
Continuous
measurements
will
have
time
stamps
to
determine
the
events
occurring
during
sampling.
The
contractor
shall
provide
documentation
to
associate
continuous
measurements
with
specific
vehicle
testing
times
and
conditions.
The
contractor
shall
also
provide
filter
identification
codes
to
track
and
catalog
all
filter
samples
collected
during
the
study.
The
filter
identification
codes
shall
allow
for
the
identification
of
the
vehicle(
s)
tested
to
obtain
the
sample.
The
contractor
shall
also
prepare
proper
sample
handling
and
tracking
procedures
(
chain
of
custody)
as
required
by
the
QAPP.
Data
shall
be
delivered
in
the
input
formats
for
EPA's
relational
database
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Base
(
MSOD).
The
formats
are
described
and
defined
in
Attachment
A.
1.
Delivered
tables
shall
be
accurate
and
complete
before
they
are
forwarded
to
the
Sponsors.
Any
time
a
significant
change
or
changes
to
the
test
program
or
its
software
are
adopted,
the
contractor
shall
again
perform
a
complete
comparison
of
the
data
from
the
first
affected
test
vehicle
to
the
.
dbf
data
tables
generated
for
that
vehicle
(
See
section
4.0
for
further
data
management
issues.)
ID
Codes
shall
be
established
for
all
samples
(
not
just
filters).
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Table
11a.
Potential
instrument
configuration
for
continuous
and
quasi­
continuous
measurement
of
PM.
a
Sensor
Operating
Environment
Instrument
Manufacturer
Instrument
Type
(
Measurement)
Sensor
Technology
Time
Resolution
(
sec.)
Temperature
Range
(
°
C)
Sample
Flow
Rate
(
Lpm)

QCM,
RPM
 
101
Booker
Systems,
UK
Inertial
Micro­
Balance
(
PM
Mass)
Quartz
Crystal/

Frequency
Deficit
1
35
to
50
1
to
5
DPM
Monitor,

1105a
R
&
P,
Albany,
NY
Inertial
Micro­
Balance
(
PM
Mass)
Tapered
Element/
Filter
Frequency
Deficit
15
35
to
50
1
to
3.5
Dataram
 
4
Thermo
MIE,

Bedford
MA
Nephelometer
(
PM
light
Scattering)
Photo
Diode/
Two
Wavelength
1
35
to
50
1
to
2
Aethalometer,
AE2
McGee
Scientific,

Berkeley,
CA
Light
Absorption
(
Black
Carbon
and
PAH)
Photo
Diode/
Light
Absorption
at
800nm
and
370nm
300
20
to
40
5
a
The
instruments
listed
are
an
example
only,
based
on
the
descriptions
in
Section
3.3.
The
contractor
may
propose
alternative
instruments.
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Table
11b.
Potential
instruments
for
integral
measurement
of
PM.
Sample
Operating
Environment
Instrument
Manufacturer
Instrument
Type
(
Measurement)
Sensor
Technology
Suggested
Sample
Media
Temperature
Range
(
°
C)
Sample
Flow
Rate
(
Lpm)

Filter
Holder
6186
R
&
P,
Albany,
NY
Gravimetric
Micro­
Balance
(
separate
filters
for
LA92
Phase
1
and
LA92
Phases
2­
4.(
PM
Mass)
Gravimetric
Micro­
Balance
Teflo
Filter
35
to
50
50
to
70
Thermo­
Optical
Carbon
Aerosol
Lab
Analyzer
Sunset
Laboratory,

Forest
Grove,
OR
Carbon
Aerosol
Analysis
(
PM
Elemental
and
Organic
Carbon
Mass)
FID
Detection
of
Thermaly
Liberated
CO
2
Pre­
Fired
Quartz
Filter
35
to
50
2
to15
Filter
Holder
6186
R
&
P,
Albany,
NY
ICP­
MS
and/
or
XRF
(
PM
Element
Mass)
b
Analysis
Dependent
Teflo
Filter
35
to
50
50
to
70
Filter
Holder
6186
R
&
P,
Albany,
NY
IC
and
AC
(
PM
Water
Soluble
Ions)
Analysis
Dependent
Quartz
Filter
35
to
50
50
to
70
Filter
Holder
6186
R
&
P,
Albany,
NY
GC/
MS
(
PM
SVOC)
Analysis
Dependent
XAD­
4
Coated
Filter
35
to
50
50
to
70
Summa
Cannister
Anderson
Instruments,

Atlanta,
GA
GC/
MS
(
VOCs)
Analysis
Dependent
Summa
Cannister
35
to
50
Sample
Dependent
DNPH
Cartridge
Anderson
Instruments,

Atlanta,
GA
GC/
MS
(
Aldehydes
and
Ketones)
Analysis
Dependent
DNPH
Cartridges
35
to
50
Sample
Dependent
1
See
Statement
of
Work
a
The
instruments
listed
are
an
example
only,
based
on
the
descriptions
in
Section
3.3.
The
contractor
may
propose
alternative
instruments.

b
The
contractor
may
use
the
PM
mass
filter
for
the
elements
analysis.
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Table
12.
SVOCs
Recommended
for
Analysisa
Compound
Compound
PAHs
Steranes
Naphthalene
20R,
5a(
H),
14b(
H),
17b(
H)­
Cholestane
Acenaphthylene
20S,
5a(
H),
14b(
H),
17b(
H)­
Cholestane
Acenaphthene
20R,
5a(
H),
14a(
H),
17a(
H)­
Cholestane
Fluroene
20R,
5a(
H),
14b(
H),
17b(
H)­
Ergostane
Phenanthrene
20S,
5a(
H),
14b(
H),
17b(
H)­
Ergostane
Anthracene
22R,
5a(
H),
14b(
H),
17b(
H)­
Sitostane
Fluoranthene
22S,
5a(
H),
14b(
H),
17b(
H)­
Sitostane
Acephenathrylene
Hopanes
Pyrene
22,29,30­
Trisnorhopane
Benzo[
ghi]
fluoranthene
17a(
H)­
21b(
H)­
29­
Norhopane
Cyclopenta[
cd]
pyrene
18a(
H)­
29­
Norneohopane
Benzo[
a]
anthracene
17a(
H)­
21b(
H)­
Hopane
Chrysene/
Triphenylene
22R&
S,
17a(
H),
21b(
H)­
30­
Homohopane
Benzo[
k]
fluoranthene
22R&
S,
17a(
H)
21b(
H)­
30­
Bishomohopane
Benzo[
b]
fluoranthene
Resin
Acids
Benzo[
j]
fluoranthene
Pimaric
Acid
Benzo[
e]
pyrene
Isopimaric
acid
Benzo[
a]
pyrene
Sandaracopimaric
acid
Perylene
Indeno[
cd]
fluoranthene
8,15­
Pimaredienoic
acid
Indeno[
cd]
pyrene
Dehydroabietic
acid
Dibenzo[
ah]
anthracene
7­
Oxodehydroabietic
acid
Benzo[
ghi]
perylene
Abieta­
6,8,11,13,15­
pentae­
18­
oic
acid
Coronene
Abieta­
8,11,13,15­
tetraen­
18­
oic
acid
Retene
Abietic
acid
Saturated
Cycloalkanes
Branched
Alkanes
Dodecylcyclohexane
Norpristane
Tridecylcyclohexane
Pristane
Tetradecylcyclohexane
Phytane
Pentadecylcyclohexane
iso­
Nonacosane
Hexadecylcyclohexane
anteiso­
Triacontane
Heptadecylcyclohexane
iso­
Hentriacontane
Octadecylcyclohexane
anteiso­
Dotriacontane
Nonadecylcyclohexane
iso­
Hentriacontane
a
At
a
minimum,
the
compounds
listed
in
this
Table
should
be
analyzed.
The
contractor
should
recommend
additional
compounds
that
they
believe
are
important
for
the
program
related
to
emission
inventory
and
source
apportionment
profile
development
including,
but
not
limited
to,
methyl­
and
nitro­
substituted
PAHs.
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
4.0
Quality
Assurance
Project
Plan
4.1
Preparation
of
Quality
Assurance
Project
Plan
and
Quality
Management
Plan
The
contractor
will
submit
a
draft
Quality
Assurance
Project
Plan
(
QAPP)
and
Quality
Management
Plan
(
QMP)
to
the
EPA's
Project
Officer
and
to
Sponsors
for
approval
within
thirty
(
30)
days
of
task
order
execution.
The
plan
will
detail
sample
collection
and
analysis
tasks
and
procedures
for
the
proposed
study
and
be
implemented
in
the
pilot
study.
A
final
QAPP
will
be
submitted
within
thirty
(
30)
days
after
completing
the
pilot
study.
Information
on
completing
a
QAPP
can
be
found
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
quality/
qsdocs/
r5final.
pdf.
As
part
of
the
QAPP,
we
are
proposing
that
ten
samples
collected
during
each
vehicle
round
(
1
&
2)
will
be
analyzed
by
the
contractor
and
an
independent
laboratory
chosen
by
the
EPA's
Project
Officer
in
a
round­
robin
test.
Two
sample
sets
will
be
analyzed
for
each
of
the
major
analyses
identified
in
this
statement
of
work:
gravimetric,
elements,
EC/
OC,
ions,
SVOCs,
and
gaseous
air
toxics.

All
analysis
needs
to
be
completed
and
reported
before
Project
Officer
can
approve
the
start
of
Vehicle
Testing
Round
2.
The
contractor
shall
address
how
this
will
be
accomplished
in
a
timely
manner
to
allow
for
quick
data
review
and
program
review
that
includes
technical
direction
by
the
Project
Officer
and
Sponsors
for
vehicle
testing
in
Round
2.

The
project
implementation
plan
will
specify
the
details
required
to
collect
and
analyze
the
source
samples
in
a
manner
consistent
with
the
objectives
of
the
study.
The
plan
will
be
developed
in
consultation
with
the
EPA's
Project
Officer
and
Sponsors.
The
QAPP
must
be
approved
by
the
EPA's
Project
Officer
before
the
contractor
may
proceed
with
sample
analysis.
The
contractor
may
submit
separate
QAPPs
to
obtain
approvals
for
specific
tasks
to
expedite
sample
analysis
for
the
project.
The
final
QAPP
will
cover
all
aspects
of
this
test
program
as
outlined
in
this
document
including
the
following
areas:

°
provide
contractual
support
in
maintaining,
calibrating,
and
operating
mobile
source
emissions
measurement
equipment
used
in
the
field.
The
equipment
may
be,
but
is
not
limited
to,
the
NERL
transportable
dynamometer,
roadway
integrated
sampling
systems,
and
remote
sensing
of
vehicle
emissions
measuring
systems
(
RSDs).
The
necessary
support
such
as
analyzing
the
collected
samples,
data
processing,
and
report
writing
are
included.
°
pilot
programs
(
including
a
report
on
all
sample
data
analyzed)
°
vehicle
recruitment
°
vehicle
testing
°
speciation
°
quality
assurance/
quality
control
°
data
management
and
integration
°
data
analysis
°
oral
and
written
reports
°
a
methodology
for
regularly
transferring
and
review
of
all
data
streams
within
this
project
4.2
Data
Management
Data
shall
be
delivered
in
the
input
formats
for
EPA's
relational
database
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Base
(
MSOD)
and
Excel
format
The
formats
are
described
and
defined
in
Attachment
A.
1.
Delivered
tables
shall
be
accurate
and
complete
before
they
are
forwarded
to
the
Sponsors.
Any
time
a
significant
change
or
changes
to
the
test
program
or
its
software
are
adopted,
the
contractor
shall
again
perform
a
complete
comparison
of
the
data
from
the
first
affected
test
vehicle
to
the
.
dbf
data
tables
generated
for
that
vehicle.
The
level
of
precision
for
reporting
the
data
is
defined
in
the
table
specifications.
However,
it
may
be
necessary
to
alter
that
specification
at
some
time
during
the
test
program.
Therefore
all
raw
data
files
shall
be
preserved
and
delivered
to
the
Sponsors
in
the
instances
that
reprocessing
becomes
necessary.
The
contractor
shall
inform
the
Project
Officer
when
they
believe
the
specified
precision
is
inadequate
or
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
inappropriate.
The
EPA's
Project
Officer
and
the
contractor
shall
then
determine
what
changes
in
the
format
are
necessary
to
accurately
store
the
test
data
for
future
use
in
MSOD.
The
test
program
may
propagate
new
data
types
and
coordination
between
the
testing
contractor
and
the
EPA's
Project
Officer
will
need
to
occur
to
accommodate
that
data.
The
probable
input
tables
for
this
statement
of
work
are:

activity_
in.
dbf
equip_
in.
dbf
dynob_
in.
dbf
bag_
in.
dbf
tmeas_
in.
dbf
bmeas_
in.
dbf
time_
in.
dbf
ttime_
in.
dbf
trip_
in.
dbf
rmeas_
in.
dbf
scan1_
in.
dbf
scan2_
in.
dbf
ffbat_
in.
dbf
tpobd_
in.
dbf
repar_
in.
dbf
tmeas_
in.
dbf
obd_
in.
dbf
Vehicle
information
is
reported
in
the
table
equip_
in.
dbf.
Test
level
is
reported
in
the
tables
dynob_
in.
dbf
and
tmeas_
in.
dbf.
Phase
(
bag)
level
information
is
reported
in
the
tables
bag_
in.
dbf
and
bmeas_
in.
dbf.
Second
by
second
data
is
reported
in
the
tables
time_
in.
prg
and
rmeas_
in.
prg.
Any
repairs
to
a
vehicle
are
reported
in
the
table
repar_
in.
dbf.
Before
delivery
of
any
test
data
to
the
EPA's
Project
Officer,
the
Contractor
shall
process
the
completed
data
tables
through
their
quality
assurance
program.
If
the
contractor
chooses
to
use
EPA
formats,
the
EPA's
Project
Officer
shall
provide
quality
control
programs
to
check
the
data
against,
EPAVALDATA
and
SBSCHK.
prg.
These
programs
shall
check
the
data
table
for
inconsistencies
and
errors
that
would
interfere
with
their
loading
into
EPA
OMS/
ASD's
EF
database
(
MSOD).
If
the
contractor
enters
the
data
by
hand
into
tables,
the
contractor
shall
take
extra
precautions
to
assure
typographical
and
transcription
errors
have
not
occurred.
The
testing
contractor
must
identify
all
tests
with
a
unique
test
identifier
(
ctr_
tst_
id)
that
shall
be
no
greater
than
12
characters
in
length
and
a
sequential
bag
number;
1,
2,
3,
or
4
for
each
test
phase.
All
subcontractors
shall
identify
their
test
results
for
the
appropriate
sample
using
these
same
identifiers.
The
subcontractors
shall
follow
the
same
specifications
for
data
reporting
and
perform
all
the
quality
control
steps
outlined
in
this
statement
of
work.
The
program
EPAVALDATA
shall
be
used
to
determine
the
suitability
of
field
level
data
within
the
individual
tables
in
the
EPA
format
with
some
cross
level
checking
of
test
and
vehicle
weights.
Some
examples
of
fixes
to
the
data
tables
that
are
normally
found
from
data
submitted
to
the
EPA's
Project
Officer
are:
1)
WA_
ID
names
misspelled
or
not
in
CAPITAL
letters
or
an
incorrect
NULL
value
indicator
was
used;
or
2)
the
data
may
exceed
upper
or
lower
bounds
for
table
data
(
records).
If
this
is
the
case,
the
contractor
must
contact
the
EPA's
Project
Officer
to
put
through
a
change
in
the
qc_
specs
program
to
allow
the
results
in
question
to
pass
data
table
review.
Some
data
inconsistencies
may
simply
need
to
be
accepted
early
on
in
the
test
program
until
enough
results
have
been
accumulated
that
an
informed
decision
can
be
made
to
resolve
them.

The
contractor
and
the
EPA's
Project
Officer
and
Sponsors
shall
audit
(
review
a
subset
of
records
in
accordance
to
QAAP
and
QMP
documents)
and
report
the
number
of
unique
records
for
the
total
program
for
each
input
table.
The
expected
total
number
final
inventory
of
records
for
this
statement
of
work
given
a
single
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
LA92
per
vehicle
+
5%
replicates
is
as
follows:
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Table
name
Primary
Key
Unique
Records
Records
per
Vehicle
Parent
Table
Parent
Key
Field
Equip_
in.
dbf
ms_
id
480
1
None
None
Repar_
in.
dbf
ms_
id
1
for
every
repair
0
to
many
Equip_
in.
dbf
equip_
in.
ms_
id
Obd_
in
ms_
id
1
for
every
OBD
scan
0
to
1
Equip_
in.
dbf
equip_
in.
ms_
id_
id
Scan1_
in
Obd_
in
1
to
many
for
vehicles
with
OBDI
0
to
many
Obd_
in
obd_
in.
ctr_
test_
id
Scan2_
in
Obd_
in
1
to
many
for
vehicles
with
OBDII
0
to
many
Obd_
in
obd_
in.
ctr_
test_
id
Dynob_
in.
dbf
Ctr_
tst_
id
530
Number
of
Tests
Per
Vehicle
Equip_
in.
dbf
Equip_
in.
ms_
id
Bag_
in.
dbf
Ctr_
tst_
id
and
bag_
num
1590
Number
of
Tests
Per
Vehicle*
Number
of
Non­
Core
analytes
Dynob_
in.
dbf
dynob_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id
Tmeas_
in.
dbf
Meas_
id
and
ctr_
tst_
id
530
Number
of
Tests
Per
Vehicle*
Number
of
Non­
Core
analytes
Dynob_
in.
dbf
dynob_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id
Bmeas_
in.
dbf
Bag_
num,

meas_
id,
and
ctr_
tst_
id
3*
The
Number
of
Records
in
tmeas_
in.
dbf
3*
Number
of
Tests
Per
Vehicle*
Number
of
Non­
Core
analytes
Bag_
in.
dbf
dynob_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id
and
bag_
num
Time_
in.
dbg
ctr_
tst_
id
and
dynosecs
761,610
1437*
Number
of
Tests
Per
Vehicle
Dynob_
in.
dbf
dynob_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id
Rmeas_
in.
dbf
Ctr_
tst_
id,

dynosecs,
and
meastype
The
Number
of
records
in
time_
in*
Number
of
Non­
Core
1437*
Number
of
Tests
Per
Vehicle*
Number
of
Non­
Core
analytes
Time_
in.
dbf
dynob_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id
and
dynosecs
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
analytes
Ttime_
in.
dbf
Depends
on
Number
of
PEMS/
PAMS
units
Depends
on
Number
of
seconds
in
vehicle
activity
Trip_
in.
dbf
Trip_
id,
ctr_
tst_
id
and
tpmeas_
dt
Activity_
in.
d
bf
Depends
on
Number
of
PEMS/
PAMS
units
0
to
many
Equip_
in
Ctr_
tst_
id
Trip_
in.
dbf
Depends
on
Number
of
PEMS/
PAMS
units
0
to
many
Activity_
in.
dbf
ctr_
tst_
id
Fbat_
in.
dbf
Fbatch_
id
Ctr_
tst_
id
100
100
Fbatch
Fbatch_
id
and
ctr_
tst_
id
Tpodb_
in.
dbf
1
for
every
OBD
scan
0
to
many
Ttime_
in.
dbf
Trip_
id,
ctr_
tst_
id
and
tpmeas_
dt
Ffdat_
in.
dbf
Fbatch_
id
0
to
many
Tpobd_
in.
dbf
Ctr_
tst_
id,
trip_
id
and
tpmeas_
dt
Pmeas_
in.
dbf
Ctr_
tst_
id,

trip_
id
and
tpmeas_
dt
Number
of
seconds
Per
Vehicle
activity
*
Number
of
Non­
Core
analytes
Ttime_
in.
dbf
Ttime_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
The
parent
key
field
of
each
table
must
have
a
corresponding
value
in
the
primary
key
field
in
the
parent
table.
Records
that
do
not
have
a
corresponding
value
in
the
parent
table
are
"
orphans"
and
can
be
identified
with
the
program
orphanid.
prg.
Data
reported
on
a
second
by
second
basis
shall
be
integrated
and
cross­
checked
against
any
data
of
the
same
kind
that
is
mechanically
integrated
using
phase
(
bag)
level
techniques
using
the
program
sbschk.
prg.
All
second
by
second
data
or
phase
level
data
that
is
derived
from
its
integration
shall
be
visually
inspected
for
alignment
and
inappropriate
transients
(
spikes
and
drop
outs).
The
EPA's
Project
Officer
and
Sponsors
shall
audit
one
in
ten
vehicle
test
data
records
for
its
own
assurance
of
test
data
quality.
The
results
of
each
review
shall
be
published
for
the
contractor's
review
and
comment.
Any
error
found
shall
be
addressed
as
an
action
item
between
the
Contractor
and
EPA's
Project
Officer.
The
EPA's
Project
Officer
will
inform
the
Sponsors
and
ask
for
their
technical
advice
before
contacting
the
Contractor.

5.0
TASKS
5.1
Quality
Assurance
Project
Plan
(
QAPP)
and
Quality
Management
Plan
(
QMP)
Task
The
contractor
shall
provide
a
Draft
QAPP
and
QMP
thirty
(
30)
days
after
task
order
issuance
for
review
by
the
EPA's
Project
Officer
and
Sponsors.
The
contractor
shall
incorporate
all
feasible
comments
received
before
the
pilot
testing
begins.
A
final
QAPP
and
QMP
will
be
submitted
within
thirty
(
30)
days
of
completing
the
pilot
test
program
for
use
in
both
Rounds
1
and
2
of
the
vehicle
test
program.
The
QAPP
shall
conform
to
the
EPA
ANSI/
ASQC
E­
4
standard
and
should
have
an
appendix
containing
all
applicable
standard
operating
procedures
(
SOPs).
The
contractor
shall
adhere
to
all
applicable
SOPs
and
the
QA/
QC
procedures
recommended
therein.
Applicable
SOPs
are
available
for
the
transportable
dynamometer,
sampling
equipment
and
procedures,
RSDs,
and
analytical
chemistry.
The
contractor
shall
notify
the
EPA's
Project
Officer
immediately
if
they
encounter
any
equipment
failures
that
cannot
be
readily
remedied
by
the
contractor,
or
technical
problems
that
may
impact
the
quality
or
on­
time
receipt
of
deliverables,
or
if
any
required
equipment
or
supplies
are
unavailable
to
accomplish
the
required
work
under
this
task
order.

5.2
Vehicle
Recruitment
Tasks
The
contractor
will
provide
vehicle
recruitment
services
to
the
project.
The
contractor
shall
submit
monthly
progress
reports,
and
conduct
the
tasks
defined
as
follows:

5.2.1
Vehicle
Recruitment
Pilot
Study
The
contractor
shall
conduct
a
pilot
study
in
KCMA
to
evaluate
recruitment
methods
and
incentive
packages
to
identify
the
adequacy
of
the
proposed
recruitment
process.

5.2.2
Cohort/
Vehicle
Analysis
Identify
a
cohort
of
private
individuals
or
residences
for
recruitment
of
vehicles
to
the
dynamometer
emissions
testing
program
in
the
Kansas
City
Metropolitan
Area
(
KCMA).
The
cohort
should
consist
of
a
minimum
of
1,000
members
who
possess
a
minimum
of
2,000
total
vehicles.
The
cohort
shall
consist
of
a
sociodemographically
diverse
population.
The
total
vehicle
population
shall
include
the
minimum
number
of
vehicles
required
for
each
of
the
six
stratum
identified
in
Table
1
of
this
statement
of
work.
(
Note:
Specific
guidelines
have
not
been
established
on
what
constitutes
a
"
diverse"
population.
In
general,
the
contractor
shall
ensure
that
multiple
ethnicities
and
socioeconomic
classes
are
included
in
the
project.
The
contractor
shall
also
ensure
the
demographic
data
is
obtained
for
all
respondents.)
The
following
subtasks
shall
be
performed
for
the
selected
cohort.

5.2.2.
a
Cohort
Frame
Analysis
The
contractor
shall
identify
the
listing(
s)
or
frame(
s)
from
which
the
cohort
was
recruited.
The
contractor
shall
provide,
in
report
form,
a
description
of
the
list(
s)
or
frame(
s),
to
cover
the
following
topics:
(
1)
list
type
and
availability,
i.
e.,
publicly
available,
commercially
available,
etc.,(
2)
underlying
sources
from
which
the
list(
s)
were
compiled,
e.
g.,
phone
directories,
etc.,
(
3)
pricing
(
cost
for
obtaining
information,
lists,
gathering
and
analyzing
the
information),
(
4)
restrictions
on
availability,
use
or
publication,
and
(
5)
any
additional
topic(
s)
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
that
the
contractor
considers
pertinent
in
the
context
of
the
PM
emissions
study.

5.2.2.
b
Cohort
Recruitment
(
Respondent/
Non­
Respondent)
Analysis
The
contractor
shall
provide
a
description
of
the
process
through
which
the
cohort
was
recruited,
to
cover
the
following
topics:
(
1)
design
of
the
cohort,
including
stratification
and
sampling
methods,
(
2)
whether
selection
probabilities
varied
among
individual
members
or
subgroups
within
the
cohort,
based
on
the
design,
(
3)
the
response
rate
achieved
during
the
recruitment
process,
and
whether
non­
response
adjustments
would
be
appropriate
for
analysis
of
data
collected
from
the
cohort,
(
4)
availability
of
contact
information
and
descriptive
information
for
non­
respondents
to
the
cohort
and
(
5)
any
additional
topic(
s)
that
the
contractor
considers
pertinent
in
the
context
of
the
study.
As
part
of
this
task,
the
contractor
shall
provide
the
EPA
Project
Officer
with
access
to
the
vehicle
registration
database
for
the
KCMA
within
fifteen
(
15)
days
of
task
order
issuance.

5.2.3
Cohort/
Vehicle
Fleet
Analysis
Compare
the
distribution
of
vehicles,
by
age
and
class,
in
the
cohort
fleet
to
the
Kansas
City
metropolitan
area
fleet.
The
contractor
shall
determine
the
representativeness
of
the
cohort
fleet
to
the
regional
fleet.
The
contractor
shall
use
parametric
or
non­
parametric
statistical
tests
to
make
comparisons,
as
appropriate.
For
any
test
applied,
the
contractor
shall
provide
a
retrospective
estimate
of
the
power
of
the
test
(
Note:
Power
refers
to
an
analytical
process
used
on
all
analyses
using
standard
accepted
techniques
for
the
statistics
used).
The
contractor
shall
also
compare
the
cohort
and
Kansas
City
fleets
to
the
national
fleet
characteristics,
as
feasible.

5.2.4
Cohort/
Vehicle
Emission
Analysis
Compare
exhaust
emissions
of
HC,
NOx,
and
CO
from
the
cohort
fleet
to
the
KCMA
fleet.
The
contractor
shall
determine
the
comparability
of
the
cohort
fleet
emissions
distribution
to
the
regional
fleet
by
comparing
exhaust
emissions
from
cohort
and
non­
cohort
vehicles
using
remote
sensing
devices
(
RSDs)
in
Kansas
City.
The
contractor
shall
use
parametric
or
non­
parametric
statistical
tests
to
make
comparisons,
as
appropriate.
For
any
test
applied,
the
contractor
shall
provide
a
retrospective
estimate
of
the
power
of
the
test.
The
contractor
shall
detail
the
data
being
collected
and
the
methods
of
comparison.

5.2.5
Cohort/
Vehicle
Summary
Analysis
Prepare
a
report
that
summarizes
the
chosen
cohort
for
the
emissions
testing
program,
based
on
sociodemographic
characteristics,
and
compares
the
cohort
fleet,
based
on
vehicle
characteristics
and
emissions,
to
the
regional
and
national
fleets.
The
report
shall
also
include
the
items
listed
in
Section
3,
as
well
as
a
discussion
of
potential
sampling
or
non­
sampling
biases
that
may
result
from
using
the
cohort
as
the
recruitment
population
for
the
emissions
testing
program.

5.2.6
Vehicle
Recruitment
Sample
Plan
Design
a
sampling
plan
for
the
random
selection
of
480
vehicles
to
be
tested
for
exhaust
emissions
using
the
EPA
dynamometer.
For
Round
1,
170
vehicles
will
be
recruited
from
the
cohort
and
80
vehicles
will
be
recruited
from
the
cohort
non­
response
families.
Round
2
vehicle
testing
will
consist
of
another
230
different
vehicles
from
the
cohort
and
25
vehicles
recruited
from
Round
1
for
re­
testing.
The
plan
shall
target
a
stratified
sample
as
identified
in
Table
1
of
this
statement
of
work.
This
task
shall
not
commence
until
the
contractor
has
received
written
approval
from
the
EPA's
Project
Officer.
If
use
of
the
registration
sample
for
recruitment
will
result
in
different
costs,
the
contractor
shall
note
these
costs
in
their
proposal.

5.2.7
Vehicle
Recruitment
5.2.7a
Vehicle
Recruitment
(
Round
1)
The
contractor
shall
recruit
vehicles
to
the
emissions
testing
program
for
Round
1
of
the
project
using
the
sampling
plans
developed
for
Task
5.
The
contractor
shall
retain,
at
a
minimum,
the
following
information
for
all
persons
recruited
to
the
program,
whether
they
participate
or
not:
(
1)
contact
information,
(
2)
location
of
residence,
(
3)
any
socio­
demographic
description
information
available
for
the
residence
or
individual,
emphasizing
indicators
listed
in
5.2.2
above,
(
4)
the
date,
time
and
mode
of
each
attempted
contact,
and
(
5)
the
outcome
of
each
attempted
contact.
This
task
shall
not
commence
until
the
contractor
has
received
written
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
approval
from
the
EPA's
Project
Officer.

5.2.7b
Vehicle
Recruitment
(
Round
2)
The
contractor
shall
recruit
vehicles
to
the
emissions
testing
program
for
Round
2
of
the
project
using
the
sampling
plans
developed
for
Task
5.
The
contractor
shall
retain,
at
a
minimum,
the
following
information
for
all
persons
recruited
to
the
program,
whether
they
participate
or
not:
(
1)
contact
information,
(
2)
location
of
residence,
(
3)
any
socio­
demographic
description
information
available
for
the
residence
or
individual,
emphasizing
indicators
listed
in
5.2.2
above,
(
4)
the
date,
time
and
mode
of
each
attempted
contact,
and
(
5)
the
outcome
of
each
attempted
contact.
This
task
shall
not
commence
until
the
contractor
has
received
written
approval
from
the
EPA's
Project
Officer.

5.2.8
Non­
Response
Assessment
As
part
of
the
recruitment
process,
eighty
(
80)
people
who
did
not
positively
respond
to
the
initial
request
to
participate
in
the
cohort
will
be
randomly
selected.
These
owner's
vehicles
will
be
recruited
to
the
program
to
assess
any
potential
bias
in
results
from
the
recruitment
of
volunteers
to
the
study.
A
list
of
nonrespondent
criteria
will
be
developed
with
approval
from
EPA's
Project
Officer
and
Sponsors.
The
number
of
vehicles
to
target
in
each
strata
for
the
non­
response
analysis
is
shown
in
Table
3
(
section
3.1.3).

5.2.9
Participation
Incentives
Incentives
will
be
required
for
study
participants.
Potential
incentives
include
rental
cars,
cash,
free
gasoline,
free
vehicle
repairs,
and
free
cleanup
of
participant
vehicles.
The
contractor
shall
develop
recruitment
package(
s)
that
will
achieve
a
high
participation
rate
to
the
study
from
the
randomly
chosen
subjects
(
both
cohort
participants
and
non­
respondents,
if
applicable).

5.2.10
Post
Round
1
Vehicle
Analysis
After
the
completion
of
Round
1
vehicle
testing,
the
contractor
shall
provide
to
the
Project
Officer
and
the
Sponsors
all
the
results
(
emission
results
(
only
the
PM
mass
filter
and
regulated
emission),
data
analysis,
any
issues,
technical
directions
or
concerns
that
occurred)
for
their
review.
Based
on
the
results
of
Round
1
recruitment
strata
and/
or
testing
procedures
might
need
to
be
adjusted
before
the
start
of
vehicle
testing
(
Round
2).
The
contractor
shall
not
start
Round
2
of
vehicle
testing
without
prior
approval
from
the
Project
Officer.

5.3
Vehicle
Testing
Task
The
contractor
shall
provide
vehicle
testing
services
to
the
project
for
the
pilot
and
intensive
field
study.
The
contractor
shall
submit
monthly
progress
reports,
and
conduct
the
tasks
defined
as
follows:

5.3.1
Pilot
Vehicle
Testing
Task
The
contractor
for
this
program
will
conduct
a
pilot
test
in
the
Kansas
City
area
to
determine
and
finalize
all
testing
methodologies,
quality
assurance
and
quality
control
procedures,
and
data
management
procedures.
For
the
pilot
test
program,
three
vehicles,
a
newer
vehicle,
intermediate
aged
and
mileage
vehicle
and
a
high
emitter,
will
be
tested
a
minimum
of
three
times
each
on
an
EPA
fixed­
site
dynamometer
in
Ann
Arbor,
MI
and
on
the
transportable
EPA
dynamometer
located
in
Kansas
City.
All
vehicle
testing
and
sample
analysis
procedures
described
in
Section
3.2
and
3.3,
respectively,
will
be
conducted
for
the
pilot
test
study.
Within
one
month
after
completing
the
pilot
study,
the
contractor
shall
complete
a
report
that
includes
emission
rates
obtained
for
regulated
pollutants
and
PM
from
any
vehicles
tested
during
the
pilot
study.
This
report
shall
be
submitted
to
the
EPA's
Project
Officer
and
Sponsors
for
use
in
evaluating
results
obtained
in
the
pilot
study.
The
fuel
and
oil
used
at
Ann
Arbor,
MI
testing
facilities
will
be
shipped
with
the
vehicles
for
use
in
Kansas
City.
The
contractor
will
provide
a
determination
by
conducting
an
experiment
or
series
of
experiments
to
determine
if
10
hours
of
tunnel
purging
(
tunnel
fans
on)
is
needed
to
achieve
a
stable
tunnel
operation
(
this
pertains
to
tunnel
wall
loss
or
entrainment
issues)
or
if
other
methods
that
could
achieve
goal
but
cost
less.

5.3.2
Vehicle
Testing
Task
(
Specialized
sampling
and
analytical
needs)
The
contractor
shall
complete
development
and
implement
the
capability
to
collect
and
speciate
gaseous
and
PM
organic
and
PM
inorganic
samples
during
any
field
study
involving
the
transportable
dynamometer.
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Emission
rates
of
these
compounds
using
the
equipment
listed
in
Table
11
shall
be
reported
in
units
of
grams
per
mile
(
g/
mile).

5.3.3
Vehicle
Testing
Task
The
contractor
shall
provide
a
cost
break
down
for
both
scenarios
listed
in
section
3.2.2.1
including
the
following
sub­
tasks
listed
below.

5.3.3.1
Protective
Covering
for
Equipment
and
Test
Vehicles:
The
contractor
shall
provide
protection
of
the
testing
equipment
and
the
recruited
vehicles
from
the
elements
during
participation
in
the
study
but
is
not
required
to
be
heated.

5.3.3.2
Vehicle
Testing
and
Data
Collection:
Vehicles
scheduled
for
testing
will
be
conditioned,
cold
soaked
overnight,
then
tested
using
the
cold
start,
LA­
92.
For
the
cold­
start
tests,
regulated
emissions
will
be
measured
over
three
phases
of
the
test
cycle
by
integrating
the
real­
time
data.
Dilute
exhaust
bag
samples
for
each
of
the
three
test
phases
and
one
background
bag
sample
shall
be
collected
from
the
CVS
for
comparison
with
the
integrated
THC
measurement
(
FID)
and
for
on­
and
off­
site
GC
analysis.
Programming
of
equipment
and
design
of
the
experiment
shall
be
such
as
to
enable
separate
PM
samples
to
be
drawn
from
each
of
the
four
separate
phases
of
the
LA­
92
driving
schedule.
All
tests
should
be
scheduled
so
that
a
minimum
of
five
vehicles
per
day
can
be
tested.

5.3.3.3
RSD
Evaluation:
The
contractor
shall
evaluate
exhaust
emissions
of
the
test
vehicles
for
NOx,
HCs,
and
CO
using
RSD
during
the
conditioning
process
of
the
vehicle
and/
or
immediately
after
dynamometer
testing.
An
alternate
approach
is
to
use
second
by
second
data
from
the
Unified
Cycle
emissions
measured
on
the
chassis
dynamometer.

5.3.3.4
Vehicle
Fluid
Sampling:
The
contractor
shall
have
selected
vehicle's
fuel
and
oil
samples
analyzed
and
report
the
results
to
the
Project
Officer
and
Sponsors.
The
contractor
shall
also
have
KCMA
fuel
samples
analyzed
and
report
the
results
to
the
Project
Officer
and
Sponsors.
The
contractor
will
provide
cost
estimates
for
gathering,
shipping
(
if
any)
and
analysis
for
both
fuel
and
oil
on
a
per
sample
basis
and
for
each
methodology
listed
in
section
3.3.2.7.

5.3.3.5
PEMS
/
PAMS
Data:
The
contractor
shall
report
data
obtained
in
the
study
to
EPA's
Project
Officer
and
Sponsors.
Data
shall
be
delivered
in
the
input
formats
for
EPA's
relational
database
MSOD
and
in
Excel
Spreadsheets.
A
separate
cost
estimate
for
each
round
of
vehicle
testing
will
be
provided
on
a
per
vehicle
basis
for
each
PEMS
and
PAMS
measurement.
A
separate
cost
estimate
will
also
be
provided
for
the
use
of
PAMS
during
the
vehicle
conditioning
route
on
a
per
vehicle
basis.

5.3.3.6
Reports:
The
contractor
shall
report
data
obtained
in
the
study
to
the
EPA's
Project
Officer
using
Excel
spreadsheets
that
have
been
approved
by
the
EPA's
Project
Officer
for
compatibility
with
their
data
system.
If
needed,
the
original
Excel
and
Lotus
data
files
can
be
converted
to
a
dbf
format.
The
contractor
shall
report
to
the
EPA's
Project
Officer
the
status
of
equipment
following
its
assembly
in
the
field
and
prior
to
its
use
in
the
study.
Upon
completion
of
the
study
(
within
two
months
following
testing),
The
contractor
shall
submit
a
draft
final
report
to
the
EPA's
Project
Officer
and
Sponsors
detailing
their
work
in
the
study.
Tables
will
be
included
showing
accepted
and
rejected
vehicle
IDs
with
OMB2060­
0078
or
ICR
0619.08
questionnaire
information,
visible
smoke
observations,
and
emission
rates
for
regulated
pollutants
and
PM.
The
draft
report
shall
be
submitted
for
approval
by
all
study
participants.

5.4
Speciation
Tasks
5.4.1
Pilot
Methods
Testing
Task
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
The
contractor
will
review,
document,
and
change
if
necessary,
all
procedures,
methods,
and
sample
analyses
to
ensure
proper
sampling
handling
and
emission
measurements
for
the
testing
program.
The
contractor
shall
update
the
QAPP
to
represent
any
changes
in
the
procedures
or
methods
resulting
from
the
pilot
study.
The
contractor
will
provide
and
prepare
sampling
equipment
and
sampling
substrates
required
for
the
collection
of
the
samples
listed
in
Table
7
during
the
pilot
study.

5.4.2
Source
Testing
Equipment
Preparation
Task
The
contractor
will
provide
and
prepare
sampling
equipment
and
sampling
substrates
required
for
the
collection
of
the
samples
listed
in
Table
7.
The
contractor
will
pre­
test
the
continuous
and
integrated
sampling
equipment
prior
to
installation
at
the
pilot
testing
site
to
ensure
proper
operation
and
familiarity
by
field
personnel.
The
contractor
will
provide
personnel
to
operate
the
samplers
and
collect
and
store
each
sample.

5.4.3
Operating
Continuous
Measurements
of
Fine
PM
Task
The
contractor
will
provide
and
operate
real­
time
monitors
for
the
measurement
of
fine
particle
mass
and
fine
particle
elemental
carbon
as
shown
in
Table
11.
The
contractor
shall
also
provide
estimates
of
mass
and
EC
concentrations
collected
during
dynamic
tunnel
blank
sample
collection
to
evaluate
the
condition
of
the
dilution
tunnel
before
conducting
tests
on
the
next
vehicle.
The
contractor
shall
submit
separate
cost
estimates
for
operating
and
analyzing
data
for
each
equipment
type
as
follows:

5.4.3.1
QCM
5.4.3.2
TEOM
5.4.3.3
Nephelometer
5.4.3.4
EC
5.4.4
Integrated
Sample
Collection
and
Sample
Analyses
Task
The
contractor
shall
collect
samples
on
each
vehicle
tested,
and
conduct
laboratory
analyses
on
the
number
of
samples
as
shown
in
Table
7.

5.4.5
Integrated
Sample
Analyses
Task
The
contractor
shall
perform
sample
analyses
for
integrated
PM
mass,
EC/
OC,
elements,
ions,
SVOC's,
and
gaseous
air
toxics
based
on
a
percent
of
the
sample
estimates
shown
in
Table
7.
The
contractor
shall
collect
samples
for
all
vehicles
tested,
as
shown
in
Table
7.
All
samples
not
analyzed
shall
be
stored
in
a
freezer
and
be
retained
by
the
contractor
for
a
period
of
two
(
2)
year
after
completion
of
the
task
order
for
potential
future
compositional
analysis.
If
EPA
requires
any
samples
to
be
analyzed
beyond
what
was
required
in
this
task
order,
EPA
will
pay
for
shipping
cost
through
a
different
contract
mechanism.
Two
years
after
testing
has
been
completed,
ownership
of
samples
revert
to
the
contractor.
The
contractor
shall
provide
cost
estimates
for
these
tasks
on
a
per
vehicle/
sample
basis
for
the
following:
1)
the
analysis
of
only
fifty
(
50)
vehicles
between
Rounds
1
and
2
combined;
and
2)
total
costs
for
testing
all
vehicles
in
Rounds
1
and
2
of
the
project.
Costs
for
PM
2.5
mass
gravimetric
analysis
shall
be
given
for
all
vehicles
only.
The
contractor
can
propose
to
do
composites
and
composite
samples
may
be
approved
by
the
PO.
Each
composite
sample
shall
be
considered
as
one
sample.
Any
analytical
preparation
costs
should
be
included
as
a
lump
sum
in
this
task.
The
contractor
may
want
to
review
the
literature
since
these
compounds
have
been
measured
in
previous
vehicle
emission
studies
and
some
are
referenced
in
this
document.
The
contractor
needs
to
provide
per
sample
and
bulk
sample
costs
to
determine
potential
economies
of
scale
in
multiple
sample
analyses.
If
there
are
no
cost
differences,
the
proposed
pricing
should
reflect
this.

The
costs
shall
be
provided
based
on
the
compounds
analyzed
as
follows:

5.4.5.1
PM2.5
Mass
Gravimetric
Analysis.
Three
filter
samples
will
be
collected
and
analyzed
for
each
vehicle
tested.
Costs
for
PM
2.5
mass
gravimetric
analysis
shall
be
given
for
all
vehicles
only.
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
5.4.5.2
Elements.
One
filter
sample
will
be
collected
for
each
vehicle
tested
(
three
if
the
PM
2.5
mass
filters
are
used
for
this
analysis).
The
number
of
samples
to
be
collected
is
shown
in
Table
7.
The
contractor
may
use
the
filters
collected
and
analyzed
for
PM
2.5
mass
for
this
task.
The
contractor
will
indicate
their
ability
to
measure
these
elements
within
both
fuel,
oil
and
PM
samples
and
the
sensitivity
of
the
measurement
technique(
s)
(
e.
g.
10
namograms
per
mile)
that
they
propose
to
use.
The
contractor
should
indicate
their
knowledge
of
measurement
techniques.

5.4.5.3
EC/
OC.
One
sample
will
be
collected
for
each
vehicle
tested.
The
number
of
samples
to
be
collected
is
shown
in
Table
7.

5.4.5.4
Ions.
One
sample
will
be
collected
for
each
vehicle
tested.
The
number
of
samples
to
be
collected
is
shown
in
Table
7.

5.4.5.5
Semi­
Volatile
Organic
Compounds.
One
sample
will
be
collected
for
each
vehicle
tested.
The
number
of
samples
to
be
collected
is
shown
in
Table
7.
The
contractor
shall
analyze,
at
a
minimum,
the
compounds
listed
in
Table
8.
The
contractor
should
also
recommend
additional
compounds
that
they
believe
are
important
for
the
program
related
to
emission
inventory
and
source
apportionment
profile
development.
EPA
recognizes
that
results
of
the
project
may
be
used
to
develop
source
apportionment
profiles.
Contractors
may
compare
these
profiles
with
previous
studies.

5.4.5.6
Gaseous
Air
Toxics.
One
Summa
canister
and
DNPH
sample
will
be
collected
for
each
vehicle.
The
number
of
samples
to
be
collected
is
shown
in
Table
7.

5.4.6
Data
Analysis
Task.
The
contractor
will
compile
analyzed
data
into
a
validated
database
that
will
be
made
available
to
the
EPA's
Project
Officer.
Data
validation
procedures
will
be
included
in
the
QAPP.

5.4.7
Analysis
of
Continuous
PM
and
EC
Data
Task.
The
continuous
particulate
measurements
will
be
made
available
promptly
for
the
relevant
personnel
attached
to
the
project.
The
data
will
be
provided
in
individual
files
pertaining
to
a
given
day
of
measurement
in
the
case
of
ambient
sampling,
or
to
a
particular
vehicle
in
the
case
of
source
sampling.
The
data
will
be
calibrated
to
an
agreed
upon
standard
of
pressure
and
temperature.
The
data
will
be
time
averaged
and
accumulated
over
the
entire
sampling
period
and
will
be
compared
with
filter­
based
measurements.

5.4.8
Maintenance
of
Emission
Equipment
Task
The
contractor
shall
maintain,
calibrate,
and
operate
all
emission
equipment
except
the
transportable
dynamometer
to
make
real­
world
vehicle
emissions
measurements
in
the
field
and
laboratory.
The
other
equipment
may
include
but
not
be
limited
to
RSDs
and
other
PM
equipment
used
in
conducting
roadside,
tunnel
air
pollution
studies
and
PEMS/
PAMS.
The
contractor
shall
repair
the
equipment
on
an
as
needed
basis.
However,
any
modification
of
the
equipment
must
be
approved
in
writing
by
the
EPA's
Project
Officer.

5.4.9
Health,
Safety
and
Environmental
Practices
Task
The
contractor
shall
comply
with
all
federal
health
and
safety,
environmental,
waste
handling,
and
other
applicable
work
rules.
The
contractor
shall
also
follow
proper
laboratory,
field
testing,
and
vehicle
testing
practices
for
all
work
required
by
this
task
order.

6.0
Reporting
Requirement
and
Deliverables
The
contractor
shall
address
and
report
all
data
and
technical
issues
required
in
Sections
2
through
5
of
this
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
task
order.
A
draft
final
report
shall
be
prepared
and
submitted
electronically
and
in
hard
copy.
Once
the
draft
report
is
approved,
the
final
report
shall
be
submitted
to
the
EPA
project
officer.
Documents
shall
be
prepared
using
a
version
of
Microsoft
Word
or
comparable
systems
when
feasible
or
unless
otherwise
specified
in
the
task
order.
Electronic
media
materials
delivered
to
the
EPA's
Project
Officer
and
Sponsors
shall
be
provided
on
3
1/
2"
disks,
CD­
R,
DVD­
R
or
hard­
drive.
Copies
of
all
written
deliverables
shall,
to
the
extent
possible,
be
double­
spaced
copies,
and
shall
be
delivered
in
reusable/
recyclable
envelopes.
The
contractor
shall
develop
and
maintain
files
supporting
the
requirements
of
each
task.

6.1
Test
Project
Workplan
The
contractor
shall
deliver
to
the
EPA's
Project
Officer
and
Sponsors
for
approval
that
includes
all
descriptions,
cost,
responsibilities,
schedules
described
in
this
document
including:

­
Pilot
vehicle
testing
­
Quality
assurance
project
plan
­
Vehicle
recruitment
plan
­
Participate
in
on­
going
communications
to
develop
a
work
plan
and
coordinate
action
items
and
scheduling.
Deliver
monthly
reports
summarizing
activities
and
costs.
­
Report
repairs
needed
as
a
result
of
any
evaluation
of
the
dynamometer.
­
Prepare
a
project
implementation
plan
within
four
weeks
of
task
order
approval.
­
Prepare
a
draft
final
technical
report
of
study
results
­
Complete
a
revised
technical
report
6.2
Other
Deliverables
Other
reports
or
meetings
dealing
with
problems
or
special
situations
that
may
arise
shall
be
requested
through
technical
direction
from
EPA's
Project
Officer.

7.0
Meetings
and
Technical
Direction
A
kick­
off
meeting
to
discuss
this
Project
with
EPA's
Project
Officer
and
Sponsors
will
be
held.
Meetings
to
review
data
and
analyses
will
be
held
on
an
as
needed
basis.
The
Project
Officer
is
authorized
to
provide
technical
direction,
which
clarifies
the
Statement
of
Work
as
set
forth
in
this
task
order.
Before
accepting
any
action
under
technical
direction,
the
contractor
shall
ensure
that
the
technical
direction
falls
within
the
scope
of
work
for
this
task
order.
Technical
direction
will
be
confirmed
in
writing,
by
the
EPA's
Project
Officer,
within
five
calendar
days
after
verbal
issuance.
The
EPA
Project
Officer
will
forward
a
copy
to
the
respective
Sponsors'
representatives.
Technical
directions
must
be
within
the
scope
of
the
task
order
and
the
Statement
of
Work.
Technical
direction
includes
(
1)
direction
to
the
contractor
which
assists
it
in
accomplishing
the
Statement
of
Work,
and
(
2)
comments
on
and
approval
of
reports
and
other
deliverables.
The
Contracting
Officer
is
the
only
person
authorized
to
make
changes
to
this
task
order.
Any
changes
must
be
approved
by
the
Contracting
Officer
in
writing,
as
a
modification
to
the
task
order.
Upon
issuance
of
written
technical
direction,
the
contractor
shall
submit
for
inspection
copies
of
all
work
in
progress
at
any
time
under
this
task
order.
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
8.0
Schedule:

Final
Project
Workplan
March
5,
2004
Draft
Quality
Assurance
Documents
March
20,
2004
Pilot
Vehicle
Testing
April
20,
2004
Final
Quality
Assurance
Documents
May
19,
2004
Vehicle
Recruitment
Plan
(
including
cohort
evaluation)
May
19,
2004
Begin
Vehicle
Recruitment
(
Round
1)
June
4,
2004
Begin
Vehicle
Testing
(
Round
1)
June
18,
2004
End
Vehicle
Testing
(
Round
1)
August
18,
2004
Interim
Report
on
Round
1
September
18,
2004
Begin
Vehicle
Recruitment
(
Round
2)
January
3,
2005
Begin
Vehicle
Testing
(
Round
2)
January
18,
2005
End
Vehicle
Testing
(
Round
2)
March
30,
2005
Draft
Final
Report
June
15,
2005
Final
Report
August
15,
2005
If
the
contractor
is
not
comfortable
with
the
schedule
listed,
the
contractor
should
propose
an
alternative
schedule
and
describe
their
rationale
for
this
change.
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
References
Cadle,
S.
H.;
Mulawa,
P.
H.;
Ball,
J.;
Donase,
C.;
Weibel,
A.;
Sagebiel,
J.
C.;
Knapp,
K.
T.;
Snow,
R.
(
1997)
Particulate
emission
rates
from
in­
use
high­
emitting
vehicles
recruited
in
Orange
county,
California.
Environ.
Sci.
Technol.
31:
3405­
3412.

Cadle,
S.
H.;
Mulawa,
P.;
Hunsanger,
E.
C.;
Nelson,
K.;
Ragazzi,
R.
A.;
Barrett,
R.;
Gallagher,
G.
L.;
Lawson,
D.
R.;
Knapp,
K.
T.;
Snow,
R.
(
1999)
Light­
duty
motor
vehicle
exhaust
particulate
matter
measurement
in
the
Denver,
Colorado,
area.
J.
Air
Waste
Manage.
Assoc.
49:
PM­
164­
174.

Durbin,
T.
D.;
Smith,
M.
R.;
Norbeck,
J.
M.;
Truex,
T.
J.
(
1999)
Population
density,
particulate
emission
characterization,
and
impact
on
the
particulate
inventory
of
smoking
vehicles
in
the
South
Coast
Air
Quality
Management
District.
J.
Air
Waste
Manage.
Assoc.
49:
28­
38.

Dzubay,
T.
G.;
Stevens,
R.
K.;
Gordon,
G.
E.;
Olmez,
I.;
Sheffield,
A.
E.;
Courtney,
W.
J.
(
1988)
A
composite
receptor
method
applied
to
Philadelphia
aerosol.
Environ.
Sci.
Technol.
22:
46­
52.

Hildemann,
L.
M.;
Markowski,
G.
R.;
Jones,
M.
C.;
Cass,
G.
R.
(
1991)
Submicrometer
aerosol
mass
distributions
of
emissions
from
boilers,
fireplaces,
automobiles,
diesel
trucks,
and
meat­
cooking
operations.
Aerosol
Sci.
Technol.
14:
138­
152.

Kleeman,
M.
J.;
Schauer,
J.
J.;
Cass,
G.
R.
(
2000)
Size
and
composition
distribution
of
fine
particulate
matter
emitted
from
motor
vehicles.
Environ.
Sci.
Technol.
34:
1132­
1142.

Lawson,
D.
R.;
Smith,
R.
E.
(
1998)
The
northern
front
range
air
quality
study:
a
report
to
the
Governor
and
General
Assembly.
Fort
Collins,
CO:
Colorado
State
University;
December.

Magliano,
K.
L.
(
1998)
Chemical
mass
balance
modeling
of
data
from
the
1995
integrated
monitoring
study.
Sacramento,
CA:
California
Air
Resources
Board.

Maricq,
M.
M.;
Podsiadlik,
D.
H.;
Chase,
R.
E.
(
1999)
Gasoline
vehicle
particle
size
distributions:
comparison
of
steady
state,
FTP,
and
US06
measurements.
Environ.
Sci.
Technol.
33:
2007­
2015.

Motallebi,
N.
(
1999)
Wintertime
PM
2.5
and
PM10
source
apportionment
at
Sacramento,
California.
J.
Air
Waste
Manage.
Assoc.
49:
PM­
25­
34.

Norbeck,
J.
M.;
Durbin,
T.
D.;
Truex,
T.
J.
(
1998)
Measurement
of
primary
particulate
matter
emissions
from
light­
duty
motor
vehicles.
Riverside,
CA:
University
of
California,
College
of
Engineering,
Center
for
Environmental
Research
and
Technology;
prepared
for
Coordinating
Research
Council,
Inc.
and
South
Coast
Air
Quality
Management
District,
CRC
Project
No.
E­
24­
2.

Ramadan,
Z.;
Song,
X.­
H.;
Hopke,
P.
K.
(
2000)
Identification
of
sources
of
Phoenix
aerosol
by
positive
matrix
factorization.
J.
Air
Waste
Manage.
Assoc.
50:
1308­
1320.

Sagebiel,
J.
C.;
Zielinska,
B.;
Walsh,
P.
A.;
Chow,
J.
C.;
Cadle,
S.
H.;
Mulawa,
P.
A.;
Knapp,
K.
T.;
Zweidinger,
R.
B.;
Snow,
R.
(
1997)
PM­
10
exhaust
samples
collected
during
IM­
240
dynamometer
tests
of
in­
service
vehicles
in
Nevada.
Environ.
Sci.
Technol.
31:
75­
83.

Schauer,
J.
J.;
Rogge,
W.
F.;
Hildemann,
L.
M.;
Mazurik,
M.
A.;
Cass,
G.
R.
(
1996)
Source
apportionment
of
airborne
particulate
matter
using
organic
compounds
as
tracers.
Atmos.
Environ.
30:
3837­
3855.

Schauer,
J.
J.,
and
G.
R.
Cass,
2000,
"
Source
apportionment
of
wintertime
gas­
phase
and
particle­
phase
air
pollutants
using
organic
compounds
as
tracers,"
Environmental
Science
and
Technology,
34,
1821­
1832.
Performance
Work
Statement
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Yanowitz
et
al.
2000
Appendix
A.
1
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Entry
Instructions
for
Kansas
City
PM
Vehicle
Testing
GENERAL
REQUIREMENTS:
The
contractor
shall
in
general
fill
out
the
data
tables
completely
and
as
best
they
are
able
using
the
supporting
documentation
and
tables..
If
they
have
questions
they
should
contact
the
project
officer
(
PO)
to
receive
guidance.
If
the
contractor
believes
the
categories
presented
are
inadequate
or
incorrect
they
shall,
in
consort
with
the
PO,
define
new
categories
for
the
data
entry.
If
the
value
is
nor
known
or
cannot
be
known
the
fields
appropriate
null
value
shall
be
taken
from
the
table
qc_
specs.
dbf.

VEHICLE/
EQUIPMENT
INFORMATION:

Vehicle/
equipment
information
is
data
which
is
required
by
the
equipment
procurement
data
table,
equip_
in.
dbf
and
shall
be
recorded
as
soon
as
a
piece
of
equipment
is
in
contractor's
custody.
The
equip_
in.
dbf
data
table
shall
be
delivered
to
the
project
officer
along
with
the
test
data.
Its
fields
shall
be
populated
as
follows:

$
The
vehicle's
(
not
the
engine's
)
serial
number
or
VIN
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
equip_
in.
veh_
ms_
id.
The
serial
number
for
a
piece
of
nonroad
equipment
is
generally
imprinted
on
a
metal
plate
which
is
attached
to
the
unit.
It
is
generally
preceded
by
"
S/
N"
or
some
similar
designation.
The
field
retains
its
"
veh"
,
or
vehicle,
designation
to
signify
mobile
source
versus
engine­
only
information
within
our
database.

$
The
engine's
serial
number
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
equip_
in.
eng_
ms_
id.
The
serial
number
for
an
engine
is
generally
imprinted
on
a
metal
plate
which
is
attached
to
the
block.
It
is
generally
preceded
by
"
S/
N"
or
some
similar
designation.

$
"
KC_
PM"
shall
be
entered
in
the
field
equip_
in.
wa_
id.

$
The
date
and
time
of
day
the
equipment
was
received
into
Contractor's
custody
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
equip_
in.
test_
date
and
equip_
in.
test_
tod,
respectively.

$
The
contractor's
unique
test
engine/
equipment
identifier
for
in­
house
tracking
purposes
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
equip_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id.

$
An
appropriate
value
for
the
site
shall
be
selected
from
the
table
site.
site
and
be
reported
in
the
field
equip_
in.
site.

$
The
allowable
values
for
equipment
procurement
methodologies
to
be
used
in
this
contract
are
located
in
the
field
procmeth.
procmeth
from
the
procmeth.
dbf
table.
The
field
procmeth.
procmeth_
d.
in
this
same
table
describes
each
of
the
allowable
values.
The
correct
value
for
each
piece
of
equipment
tested
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
equip_
in.
procmeth.

$
The
value
"
YES"
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
highway
for
a
piece
of
equipment
(
a
vehicle,
truck
or
bus)
which
is
intended
for
highway
operation
and
"
NO"
for
non­
road
equipment.

$
A
short
description
of
the
purpose
or
use
of
a
piece
of
test
equipment
or
the
equipment
platform
from
which
a
test
engine
was
derived
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
purpose.
If
this
information
is
not
known
or
cannot
be
determined,
i.
e,
a
test
engine
not
associated
with
an
equipment
platform,
the
value
"
NULL"
shall
be
entered
in
this
field.

$
"
2201020110"
shall
be
entered
for
the
LDT1,
and
"
2230070000"
for
the
type
2B
trucks
shall
be
entered
Appendix
A.
1
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Entry
Instructions
for
Kansas
City
PM
Vehicle
Testing
into
the
field
equip_
in.
scc.
In
the
case
of
a
non­
road
piece
of
equipment
an
appropriate
values
shall
be
selected
from
the
scc.
scc.

$
If
the
equipment
to
be
tested
has
an
odometer
at
the
time
of
procurement,
the
odometer's
value
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
equip_
in.
proc_
odom.
If
the
equipment
does
not
have
an
odometer,
then
the
contractor
shall
enter
"
0
"
in
this
field.

$
The
number
of
hours
of
engine
operation
as
displayed
on
the
engine
hour
meter
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
hour_
meter.
If
it
is
known
that
the
engine
hour
meter
on
a
particular
test
engine
is
malfunctioning
or
if
the
hours
of
operation
cannot
be
determined
from
a
direct
reading
of
the
engine
hour
meter,
then
the
value
"
0"
shall
be
recorded
in
the
equip_
in.
hour_
meter
field.
However,
if
a
"
good
faith"
estimate
of
the
number
of
hours
of
engine
operation
can
be
obtained
from
the
owner/
operator
of
a
particular
piece
of
equipment,
that
estimate
shall
be
rounded
to
the
nearest
10
hours
and
entered
into
the
equip_
in.
hour_
meter
field.

$
"
DIES"
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
equip_
in.
fueltype
for
equipment
which
is
powered
by
diesel
fuel
and
"
GAS"
for
equipment
powered
by
gasoline.

$
The
vehicle
manufacturer's
name
shall
be
selected
from
the
field
company.
company
from
the
table
company.
dbf
and
entered
into
the
field
equip_
in.
vehcompany.

$
The
engine
manufacturer's
name
shall
be
selected
from
the
field
company.
company
from
the
table
company.
dbf
and
entered
into
the
field
equip_
in.
engcompany.

$
The
vehicle's
nominal
engine
displacement
in
cubic
inches
shall
be
entered
in
the
field
equip_
in.
disp_
cid.
If
the
engine
displacement
is
labeled
in
liters
or
cubic
centimeters
this
field
shall
be
reported
as
"
0".

$
The
vehicle's
engine
displacement
in
liters
shall
be
entered
in
the
field
equip_
in.
disp_
liter.
If
the
engine
displacement
is
labeled
in
cubic
centimeters
that
value
shall
be
multiplied
by
1000,
and
reported
to
the
nearest
tenth
of
a
liter.
If
the
engine
displacement
is
labeled
in
cubic
inches
this
field
shall
be
reported
as
"
0".

$
The
allowable
values
for
the
method
of
fuel
delivery
for
a
vehicle
are
found
in
the
field
fuel_
del.
fuel_
deliv
and
their
description
in
the
field
fuel_
del.
fuel_
del_
d.
The
correct
fuel
delivery
code
for
the
vehicle
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
equip_
in.
fuel_
deliv.
The
vehicles
in
this
contract
will
all
probably
have
fuel
injection,
"
FI"
or
carburated
"
CARB".

$
The
correct
fuel
injection
method
for
the
unit
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
equip_
in.
fi_
type.
The
allowable
values
to
indicate
the
type
of
fuel
injection
are
found
in
the
field
fi_
type.
fi_
type
in
the
fi_
tytpe.
dbf
table
and
are
described
in
the
field
fi_
type.
fi_
type_
d.
All
of
the
equipment
procured
under
this
contract
is
expected
to
be
described
as
"
DIRECT",
"
PFI"
(
Port
Fuel
Injection),
"
TBI"
(
Throttle
Body
Inject)
though
"
INDIR"
shall
be
used,
as
appropriate.

$
The
allowable
values
to
describe
the
process
by
which
intake
air
enters
the
engine
for
combustion
are
found
in
the
field
aspirate.
aspirated
in
the
table
aspirate.
dbf
and
are
described
in
the
field
aspirate.
apirate_
d.
The
correct
value
for
the
engine
to
be
tested
within
the
equipment
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
equip_
in.
aspirated.
Appendix
A.
1
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Entry
Instructions
for
Kansas
City
PM
Vehicle
Testing
$
The
number
of
cylinders
in
the
engine
to
be
tested
is
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
cylinder.

$
The
allowable
values
to
describe
the
type
of
catalyst
which
is
present
on
the
vehicle
are
located
in
the
field
cat_
type.
cat_
type
in
the
table
cat_
type.
dbf
and
are
described
in
the
field
cat_
type.
cat_
type_
d.
The
correct
value
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
equip_
in.
cat_
type.

$
A
brief
description
as
to
the
configuration
of
any
emission
control
system
equipment
present
in
the
test
unit
shall
be
entered
into
the
equip_
in.
ecs_
descpt
field
(
up
to
50
characters).

$
The
allowable
values
to
indicate
that
the
catalyst
control
configuration
is
close
loop
are
"
YES"
or
"
NO".
It
assumed
that
the
target
vehicles
in
this
contract
that
all
the
SI
vehicles
shall
be
"
YES"
and
all
the
CI
vehicles
shall
be
"
NO".
The
appropriate
value
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
equip_
in.
closedloop.

$
An
appropriate
value
indicating
the
vehicle
class
shall
be
selected
from
vehclass.
vehclass
and
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
vehclass.

$
The
equipment's
model
year
will
be
reported
into
the
field
equip_
in.
model_
yr
in
the
4­
digit
century
inclusive
format.
If
this
information
is
not
known,
the
value
"
0"
shall
be
entered
in
this
field.

$
The
vehicle
make
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
make.

$
The
vehicle
model
name
given
to
the
vehicle
by
the
vehicle
manufacturer
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
equip_
in.
model_
name.

$
The
equipment
build
date
shall
be
recorded
in
the
date
field
equip_
in.
v_
bld_
date.
The
format
shall
be
MM/
DD/
YY.
If
the
actual
date
is
not
reported
on
the
equipment
or
in
supporting
literature
about
the
particular
unit,
then
the
build
date
shall
be
reported
as
MM/
15/
YY.
If
the
build
date
cannot
be
determined,
the
null
date
value
shall
be
reported
by
leaving
the
field
blank.

$
The
engine
build
date
shall
be
recorded
in
the
date
field
equip_
in.
e_
bld_
date.
The
format
shall
be
MM/
DD/
YY.
If
the
actual
date
is
not
reported
on
the
engine
or
in
supporting
literature
about
that
particular
engine,
then
the
build
date
shall
be
reported
as
MM/
15/
YY.
If
the
build
date
cannot
be
determined,
the
null
date
value
shall
be
reported
by
leaving
the
field
blank.

$
The
number
of
fuel
tanks
on
the
piece
of
equipment
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
equip_
in.
fueltanks.
If
this
information
is
not
known,
the
value
"
0"
shall
be
entered
in
this
field.

$
The
equipment's
total
fuel
capacity
is
recorded
to
the
nearest
gallon
in
the
field
equip_
in.
tank_
cap.
Fuel
capacity
is
to
be
determined
by
the
following
hierarchy;
labeling
found
directly
on
the
physical
tank(
s),
OEM
service
manual,
replacement
part
manual(
s),
owner's
manual,
and
as
a
last
resort
a
drain
and
fill
of
all
the
unit's
tank(
s).
If
this
information
can
not
be
determined,
the
value
"
0"
shall
be
entered
in
this
field.

$
The
engine
exhaust
emission
certification
family
designation
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
eng_
fam.
If
this
information
can
not
be
determined,
the
value
"
NULL"
shall
be
entered
in
this
field.
Appendix
A.
1
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Entry
Instructions
for
Kansas
City
PM
Vehicle
Testing
$
The
engine
evaporative
emission
certification
family
designation
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
evap_
fam.
If
this
information
can
not
be
determined,
the
value
"
NULL"
shall
be
entered
in
this
field.

$
The
allowable
values
for
the
equipment
drive
train
description
are
found
in
the
field
drv_
trn.
dvr_
trn
of
the
table
drv_
trn.
dbf
and
are
described
in
the
associated
field
dvr_
trn.
drv_
trn_
d.
The
correct
value
for
the
unit's
drive
train
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
equip_
in.
drv_
trn..
If
this
information
is
not
known,
the
value
"
NULL"
shall
be
entered
in
this
field.

$
The
engine
series
or
product
line
name
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
engine.
engseries.
If
this
information
is
not
known,
the
value
"
NULL"
shall
be
entered
in
this
field.

$
An
appropriate
value
for
engine
service
class
shall
be
selected
from
eng_
clas.
eng_
class
and
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
eng_
class.
If
this
information
is
unknown
or
cannot
be
determined,
the
value
"
NULL"
shall
be
entered
in
this
field.

$
The
engine
model
year
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
eng_
mod_
yr.
If
the
actual
date
is
not
reported
on
the
engine
or
in
supporting
literature
about
that
particular
engine,
the
value
"
0"
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field.
In
general
the
SI
vehicle
model_
year
shall
correspond
with
the
engine
model
year.
That
assumption
may
not
hold
however
with
the
CI
vehicles.
If
this
information
is
not
readily
apparent
leave
the
field
blank.

$
The
type
of
aftercooling
found
on
the
engine
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
equip_
in.
cooling.
If
the
engine
is
not
equipped
with
an
aftercooling
device,
then
"
NONE"
shall
be
recorded.
If
it
is
not
known
whether
the
engine
has
aftercooling
as
normally
configured,
the
value
"
NULL"
shall
be
recorded.

$
The
method
of
fuel
injection
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
fi_
meth
The
allowable
values
for
fuel
injection
method
are
found
in
the
field
fi_
met.
fi_
meth
in
the
table
fi_
meth.
dbf
and
are
described
in
the
field
fi_
meth.
fi_
meth_
d..
While
most
diesel
engines
are
covered
by
the
DI
and
IDI
values,
the
contractror
is
encouraged
to
identify
the
fuel
injection
method
as
specifically
as
possible.
If
this
information
is
unknown
or
cannot
be
determined
for
the
test
engine,
the
value
"
NULL"
shall
be
entered
in
this
field.

$
The
engine
manufacturer­
specified
fuel
injection
pressure
for
the
fuel
injection
system,
if
present,
on
the
test
engine
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
fi_
press.
If
this
information
is
unknown,
the
value
"
NULL"
shall
be
entered
in
this
field.

$
The
value
"
YES"
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
except
if
there
is
anything
which
is
known
to
be
or
is
obviously
exceptional
about
an
engine
or
piece
of
test
equipment
which
would
cause
the
test
unit
to
be
an
outlier
in
most
statistical
analyses
involving
the
equipment
or
engine.
Otherwise,
the
value
"
NO"
shall
be
recorded
in
the
equip_
in.
except
field.

$
A
brief
description
of
the
quality
or
qualities
which
would
make
an
engine
or
piece
of
test
equipment
exceptional
shall
be
entered
in
the
field
equip_
in.
ex_
comm.
This
field
is
used
in
conjunction
with
the
equip_
in.
except
field.
Otherwise,
the
equip_
in.
ex_
comm
field
shall
be
left
blank.

$
If
an
engine
or
piece
of
test
equipment
is
to
be
tested
with
a
particulate
trap
or
filter
in
place,
then
the
value
"
YES"
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
parttrap
otherwise
the
value
"
NO"
shall
be
recorded
Appendix
A.
1
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Entry
Instructions
for
Kansas
City
PM
Vehicle
Testing
instead.
If
this
information
is
unavailable
or
cannot
be
determined,
then
the
value
"
NUL"
shall
be
entered
in
the
equip_
in.
parttrap
field.

$
The
value
"
4"
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
eng_
cycl
for
engines
with
a
four
cycle
system.
The
value
"
2"
shall
be
recorded
for
engines
with
a
two
cycle
system.

$
The
engine
manufacturer's
specified
maximum
power
value
(
in
units
of
brake­
specific
horsepower)
at
rated
engine
speed
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
ratedpower.
If
this
information
is
unknown
or
cannot
be
determined
from
the
engine
or
in
supporting
literature
about
that
particular
engine,
the
value
"
0"
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field.

$
The
engine
manufacturer's
specified
rated
engine
speed
(
in
units
of
rpm)
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
ratedspeed.
If
this
information
is
unknown
or
cannot
be
determined
from
the
engine
or
in
the
service
information
about
that
particular
engine,
the
value
"
0"
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field.

$
The
engine's
peak
torque
shall
be
reported
in
foot
­
pounds
into
the
field
equip_
in.
peaktorque.

$
The
engine's
speed
where
peak
torque
is
obtained
shall
be
reported
in
rpms
into
the
field
equip_
in.
peakspeed.

$
The
engine's
fuel
rate
at
peak
torque
speed
in
lbs
per
hour
shall
be
reported
into
the
field
equip_
in.
peakfrate.

$
The
engine's
fuel
rate
at
rated
speed
in
lbs
per
hour
shall
be
reported
into
the
field
equip_
in.
ratedfrate.

$
The
engine
manufacturer's
specified
engine
speed
(
in
units
of
rpm)
for
engine
idle
operation
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
idle_
rpm.
If
this
information
is
unknown
or
cannot
be
determined
from
the
engine
or
in
supporting
literature
about
that
particular
engine,
the
value
"
0"
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field.

$
If
the
number
of
times
that
the
test
engine
has
been
rebuilt
is
known
or
can
be
determined,
that
number
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
rebuild_
ct.
If
this
information
is
unknown
or
cannot
be
determined
from
the
engine
or
owner/
operator,
then
the
null
value
"
99"
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field.

$
The
date
of
the
last
engine
rebuild
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
rebuild_
dt.
If
the
last
rebuild
date
cannot
be
determined
or
no
rebuild
has
occurred
the
field
shall
be
left
blank.

$
For
the
last
rebuild
of
the
test
engine
only,
if
the
reason
that
the
test
engine
was
rebuilt
is
known
or
can
be
determined,
then
that
reason
shall
be
described
in
the
field
equip_
in.
rebuildwhy.
If
the
reason
is
unknown
or
cannot
be
determined
or
if
the
engine
has
never
been
rebuilt,
then
the
equip_
in.
rebuildwhy
field
shall
be
left
blank.

$
A
brief
description
of
the
technical
configuration
and
capabilities,
power
take­
off,
power
"
bulge",
etc.,
of
the
test
equipment/
engine
and
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
tech_
confg.
If
this
information
cannot
be
determined
for
the
test
equipment/
engine
or
if
the
relevant
information
has
already
been
reported
elsewhere
in
another
field
,
then
the
equip_
in.
tech_
confg
field
shall
be
left
blank.

$
A
brief
description
of
any
electronic
interface
which
may
connect
the
equipment's
speed/
torque
controls
Appendix
A.
1
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Entry
Instructions
for
Kansas
City
PM
Vehicle
Testing
with
an
engine
component
which
commands
torque
directly
from
the
engine
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
elec_
cont.
If
this
information
is
unknown
or
cannot
be
determined
for
the
test
equipment/
engine
or
if
the
equipment
has
no
electronic
controls,
then
the
equip_
in.
modifs
field
shall
be
left
blank.

$
Any
significant
post­
OEM
additions
or
modifications
made
to
the
test
equipment/
engine
shall
be
described
in
the
field
equip_
in.
modifs.
If
this
information
is
unknown
or
cannot
be
determined
for
the
test
equipment/
engine,
then
the
equip_
in.
modifs
field
shall
be
left
blank.

$
The
allowable
values
to
categorize
a
vehicle's
transmission
are
found
in
the
field
tran_
typ.
tran_
type.
The
correct
value
for
the
vehicle
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
equip_
in.
tran_
type.

$
The
number
of
fuel
injectors
per
cylinder
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
equip_
in.
injectors.
Typical
values
are
as
follows
"
0"
for
carbureted
engines,
"
1"
for
most
SI
and
CI
engines,
etc.

$
This
represents
what
method,
if
any,
was
used
to
introduce
supplemental
air
into
the
exhaust
stream.
Legal
values
are
found
and
defined
by
AIR_
INJ
translation
table.
"
NO"
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
air_
inj
when
no
supplemental
air
was
introduced.
Other
legal
values
are
listed
below:

"
YES"
­
Has
air
injected
"
PUMP"
­
Air
injected
by
pump
"
PULSE"
­
Air
injected
by
pulse
$
The
allowable
values
to
indicate
the
catalyst
control
configuration
are
"
YES"
or
"
NO".
The
correct
value
for
the
vehicle
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
equip_
in.
closedloop.
If
this
information
is
not
known,
the
value
"
NUL"
shall
be
entered
in
this
field.

$
"
SI"
shall
be
reported
for
spark
ignition
engines
and
"
CI"
shall
be
reported
for
compression
ignition
in
the
field
equip_
in.
ignition.

$
"
NUL"
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
overdrive.

$
"
NUL"
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
creeper.

!
"
NUL"
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
equip_
in.
lockup.

!
"
NULL"
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
equip_
in.
gears.

!
For
the
FTP
test
vehicles,
Vehicle
Curb
weight,
(
as
defined
'
CFR86.082­
2)
is
the
weight
of
the
vehicle
with
all
fluids
at
their
nominal
(
full)
capacity,
including
fuel.
The
value
is
not
the
same
as
the
equivalent
test
weight.
There
is,
however,
an
exception
for
"
incomplete"
vehicles
in
the
above
CFR
quote.
A
chassis
destined
to
become
a
camper
is
an
example
of
such
a
vehicle.
In
the
case
of
an
"
incomplete"
curb
weight
is
specified
by
the
manufacturer.
The
contractor
shall
follow
the
definition
where
it
applies.
In
general
vehicle
curb
weight
shall
be
determined
by
weighing
the
vehicle
and
adding
an
estimated
additional
weight
that
would
occur
if
the
vehicle's
fuel
tanks
were
full.
That
value
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
equip_
in.
curbweight.
For
computational
purposes,
the
default
weight
for
a
gallon
of
gasoline
fuel
shall
be
6.1
pounds.
"
999999"
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
equip_
in.
curbweight
for
the
I/
M240
test
vehicles.
Appendix
A.
1
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Entry
Instructions
for
Kansas
City
PM
Vehicle
Testing
!
If
the
vehicle
has
air
conditioning
"
YES"
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
equip_
in.
ac.
If
the
vehicle
has
no
air
conditioning,
then
"
NO"
is
entered.
If
you
do
not
known
if
the
vehicle
has
air
conditioning,
"
NUL"
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
equip_
in.
ac.

!
An
appropriate
value
shall
be
selected
from
the
field
canister.
canister
and
entered
into
the
field
equip_
in.
canister.

!
If
there
is
no
exhaust
gas
recirculation,
the
value
entered
in
the
field
equip_
in.
egr
shall
be
"
NO".
If
the
engine
has
exhaust
gas
recirculation,
the
value
shall
be
"
YES".
If
its
is
unknown
the
value
entered
shall
be
"
NULL".

!
"
NULL"
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
equip_
in.
egr_
type
only
if
the
equip_
in.
egr
field
contains
either
a
"
NO"
or
"
NUL".
If
the
engine
hasexhaust
gas
recirculation
then
either
"
HOT"
for
hot
air
recirculation,
"
COOLED"
for
cool
air
recirculation
shall
be
reported
in
the
equip_
in.
egr_
type.

!
The
gross
vehicle
weight
rating
(
GVWR)
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
equip_
in.
gvwr.

!
The
gross
combined
weight
rating
(
GCWR)
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
equip_
in.
gcwr.

!
The
field
equip_
in.
comments
shall
be
used
to
identify/
explain
anything
a
vehicle
was
rejected
from
the
test
program.
Otherwise
the
fields
shall
be
left
blank.

!
The
ownership
of
the
vehicle
shall
be
reported
into
the
field
equip_
in.
ownership.
The
legal
values
are
either
"
PRIVATE"
­
privately
owned
vehicle;
"
RENTAL"
­
rented
vehicle;
or
"
GOVT"
­
owned
by
local,
state,
or
federal
government.

!
Where
the
vehicle
is
stored
shall
be
reported
into
the
field
equip_
in.
depot.
The
legal
values
shall
be
selected
from
the
table
site.
site.

!
The
engine's
NOx
certification
standard
shall
be
reported
into
the
field
equip_
in.
cert_
nox.

!
The
engine's
PM
certification
standard
shall
be
reported
into
the
field
equip_
in.
cert_
pm.

TEST
FUEL
BATCHES:

Test
fuel
properties
are
stored
in
the
fields
of
the
table
fbat_
in.
dbf.
Each
fuel
batch
shall
if
know
shall
have
its
own
unique
record
and
is
populated
as
follows;

!
The
laboratory
fuel
batch
identifier
shall
be
recorded
in
field
fbat_
in.
fbatch_
id.

!
If
the
fuel
manufacture
has
provided
the
laboratory
a
unique
identifier
for
the
test
fuel
that
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
mfg_
batch.

!
If
the
test
fuel
is
a
fuel
oil
its
centane
number
as
measured
by
ASTM
D
613
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
cetane_
num,
otherwise
"
0"
shall
be
entered
into
the
field.
Appendix
A.
1
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Entry
Instructions
for
Kansas
City
PM
Vehicle
Testing
!
If
the
test
fuel
is
a
fuel
oil
its
centane
index
as
measured
by
ASTM
D
976
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
cetane_
idx.
If
it
is
not
the
value
0
shall
be
entered.

!
If
the
centare
number
was
increased
by
a
"
cetane
improver"
the
amount
of
improvement
is
recorded
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
cetane_
imp.
If
no
cetane
improver
was
use
"
0"
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
cetane_
imp.

!
The
name
of
the
"
cetane
improver",
if
used
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
cetane_
typ.
If
no
cetane
improver
was
used
the
"
NONE"
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
cetane_
typ.

!
The
concentration
of
sulfur
in
the
test
fuel
in
ppm
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
sulfur.

!
If
an
additive
was
used
to
increase
the
amount
of
sulfur
in
the
test
fuel
the
additive's
chemical
name
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
fbat_
in.
sulf_
agent.

!
The
concentration
of
nitrogen
in
the
test
fuel
in
ppm
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
nitrogen.
If
it
is
not
known
the
value
"
99999"
shall
be
entered
into
the
field.

!
The
mass
percent
of
total
aromatics
as
measured
by
ASTM
D
5185
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
tarom.

!
The
mass
percent
of
mono­
cyclic
aromatics
as
measured
by
ASTM
D
5185
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
marom.

!
The
mass
percent
of
poly­
cyclic
aromatics
as
measured
by
ASTM
D
5185
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
parom.

!
The
test
fuel's
distillation
properties
as
measured
with
ASTM
D
86
shall
be
entered
into
the
appropriate
fields
of
fbat_
in.
IBP,
fbat_
in.
t10,
fabatch.
t50,
fbat_
in.
t90,
fbat_
in.
ep,
fbat_
in.
residue,
fbat_
in.
loss,
and
fbat_
in.
recovery.

!
The
test
fuel's
relative
density
as
specific
gravity
at
60
°
F
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
fbat_
in.
spec_
grav.

!
The
test
fuel's
relative
density
as
Degrees
API
at
60
°
F
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
fbat_
in.
api_
grav.

!
The
test
fuel's
viscosity
in
centistokes
as
measure
by
ASTM
D
455
at
100
°
F
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
fbat_
in.
viscosity.
If
the
viscosity
is
unknown
or
the
fuel
is
a
gasoline
the
value
"
0"
shall
be
entered
into
the
field.

!
The
test
fuel's
flashpoint
in
°
F
and
as
measured
by
ASTM
D
93
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
flash.
If
it
is
unknown
the
value
"
9999"
shall
be
entered
into
the
field.

!
The
test
fuel's
pour
point
in
°
F
and
as
measured
by
ASTM
D
97
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
Appendix
A.
1
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Entry
Instructions
for
Kansas
City
PM
Vehicle
Testing
fbat_
in.
pour.
If
it
is
unknown
the
value
"
9999"
shall
be
entered
into
the
field.

!
The
test
fuel's
hydrogen
to
carbon
ratio
on
a
mole
to
mole
basis
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
hcratio.
If
the
ratio
is
unknown
the
value
"
9.999"
shall
be
entered
into
the
field.

!
The
test
fuel's
oxygen
content
on
a
weight
percent
basis
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
oxygen.

!
The
compound
contributing
the
oxygen
on
the
test
fuel
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
oxy_
type.
If
there
is
no
oxygen
in
the
test
fuel
that
"
NONE"
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
oxy_
type.

!
The
weight
percent
of
any
additive
package
added
to
the
fuel,
other
than
cetane
improvers,
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
addditives.
If
the
fuel
is
a
gasoline
the
field
shall
be
left
blank.

!
The
test
fuel's
lubricity
in
grams
and
as
measured
by
ASTM
D
6078
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
fbat_
in.
lubric_
g.
If
it
is
unknown
the
value
"
99999"
shall
be
entered.

!
The
test
fuel's
lubricity
in
millimeters
of
scar
wear
and
as
measured
by
ASTM
D
6079
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
fbat_
in.
lubric_
mm.
If
it
is
unknown
the
value
"
9.99"
shall
be
entered.

!
The
test
fuel's
net
heat
of
combustion
in
BTUs/
pound
of
fuel
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
heat.

!
If
the
fuel
is
a
diesel
fuel,
the
test
fuel's
ash
expressed
in
weight
percent
and
as
measured
by
ASTM
D
482
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
ash.

!
"
0"
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
mon
and
fbat_
in.
ron
fi
the
fuel
is
a
diesel
fuel.
If
the
fuel
is
a
gasoline
the
motor
octane
will
be
entered
in
the
former
and
the
research
octane
shall
be
entered
in
the
latter.

!
If
the
fuel
is
a
gasoline
the
its
RVP
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
rvp.
If
it
is
a
diesel
fuel
the
value
"
99.9"
shall
be
entered.

!
The
grams
of
carbon
per
pound
of
test
fuel
in
dry
air
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
fen_
c.

!
The
weight
fraction
carbon
of
the
test
fuel
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
wgt_
fractn.

!
The
aromatic
content
of
the
test
fuel
in
volume
percent
and
as
measured
by
ASTM
D
1319
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
comp_
aroma.

!
The
olefin
content
of
the
test
fuel
in
volume
percent
and
as
measured
by
ASTM
D
1319
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
comp_
olefn.

!
The
saturate
content
of
the
test
fuel
in
volume
percent
and
as
measured
by
ASTM
D
1319
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
comp_
sat.

!
If
the
test
fuel
is
the
certification
gasoline
"
60"
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
fuel_
id.
If
the
test
Appendix
A.
1
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Entry
Instructions
for
Kansas
City
PM
Vehicle
Testing
fuel
is
the
certification
diesel
fuel
"
96"
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
fbat_
in.
fuel_
id.
If
the
fuel
is
tank
fuel
the
field
dyno_
in.
fuel_
id
shall
be
"
0".

!
"
KC_
PM"
shall
be
entered
in
the
field
equip_
in.
wa_
id.

!
The
cloud
measurement
of
the
test
fuel
shall
be
reportin
the
field
fbat_
in.
cloud.

FTP
LABORATORY
TESTING:
The
FTP
shall
be
run
as
a
three
phase
test.
The
laboratory
test
level
information
shall
be
reported
in
the
table
structure
headed
by
dyno_
in.
dbf
for
laboratory
values
and
are
to
be
populated
for
the
tests
as
follows:

!
The
laboratory
test
identifier
shall
be
recorded
in
field
dyno_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id.

!
"
FTP"
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
dyno_
in.
test_
proc.

!
"
KC_
PM"
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
dyno_
in.
wa_
id.

!
"
FTP"
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
dyno_
in.
sched_
id.

!
The
initial
FTP
shall
have
the
value
.
F.
entered
into
the
field
dyno_
in.
replicate.
The
second
FTP
for
the
test
vehicles
shall
have
the
value
.
T.
entered
into
the
field
dyno_
in.
replicate.

!
If
the
test
fuel
is
the
certification
gasoline
"
60"
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
dyno_
in.
fuel_
id.
If
the
test
fuel
is
the
certification
diesel
fuel
"
96"
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
dyno_
in.
fuel_
id.
If
the
fuel
is
tank
fuel
the
field
dyno_
in.
fuel_
id
shall
be
"
0".

!
The
value
entered
into
equip_
in.
veh_
ms_
id
for
this
vehicle
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
dyno_
in.
ms_
id.

!
The
test
date
and
time
of
day
shall
be
reported
into
the
fields
dyno_
in.
test_
date
and
dyno_
in.
test_
tod
respectively
following
the
format
specified
for
them.

!
"
ANNARBOR"
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
dyno_
in.
site
if
tests
were
performed
in
Michigan.
If
test
were
performed
in
Kansas
City
then
"
KANSASCITY
"
shall
be
reported.

!
75
°
F
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
dyno_
in.
nom_
temp.

!
50
grains
of
water
per
pound
of
dry
air
at
60
°
F
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
dyno_
in.
nom_
humid.

!
"
0"
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
dyno_
in.
disable.

!
FTP
composite
emissions
('
86.144­
90)
for
THC,
CO,
NOx,
and
CO2
shall
be
reported
in
the
fields
dyno_
in.
thc,
dyno_
in.
co,
dyno_
in.
co2,
and
dyno_
in.
nox.
Appendix
A.
1
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Entry
Instructions
for
Kansas
City
PM
Vehicle
Testing
!
FTP
composite
fuel
economy
in
miles
per
gallon
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
dyno_
in.
mpg.

!
The
vehicle's
ETW
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
dyno_
in.
testwght.

!
The
dynamometer's
indicated
road
load
horse
power
at
50
miles
per
hour
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
dyno_
in.
road_
hp.

!
"
NO"
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
dyno_
in.
ac_
hp.

!
An
appropriate
value
shall
be
selected
from
the
dynotype.
dynotype
and
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
dyno_
in.
dynotype.

!
The
vehicle's
odometer
reading
at
the
start
of
the
test
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
dyno_
in.
odometer.

!
The
appropriate
value
to
represent
the
tests
preconditioning
be
selected
from
the
field
precond.
precond
and
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
dyno_
in.
precond.

!
The
ambient
temperature
in
degrees
F
at
the
start
of
the
test
shall
reported
in
the
field
dyno_
in.
int_
temp.

!
The
barometric
pressure
in
inches
of
mercury
at
the
start
of
the
test
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
dyno_
in.
init_
baro.

!
The
humidity
in
grains
of
water
per
pound
of
dry
air
at
the
start
of
the
test
shall
entered
into
the
field
dyno_
in.
init_
humid.

The
field
dynob_
in.
resultgrp
shall
be
left
blank.

FTP
composite
emissions
('
86.144­
90)
for
methane
shall
be
reported
in
the
table
format
tmeas_
in.
dbf.
The
fields
shall
be
populated
as
follows:

!
"
METHANE"
shall
be
reported
as
tmeas_
in.
meas_
id
if
being
measured.

!
The
laboratory
test
id
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
tmeas_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id
and
the
same
as
that
in
dyno_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id.

!
The
composite
methane
emissions
in
grams
per
mile
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
tmeas_
in.
measure.

FTP
dynamometer
brake
horse
power
hours
shall
be
reported
in
the
table
format
tmeas_
in.
dbf.
The
fields
shall
be
populated
as
follows:

!
"
BHPH"
shall
be
reported
as
tmeas_
in.
meas_
id.

!
The
laboratory
test
id
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
tmeas_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id
and
the
same
as
that
in
dyno_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id.
Appendix
A.
1
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Entry
Instructions
for
Kansas
City
PM
Vehicle
Testing
!
The
amount
of
work
performed
by
the
vehicle
,
as
measured
by
the
dynamometer
for
the
entire
test
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
tmeas_
in.
measure
in
units
of
brake
horsepower
hours.

For
SI
vehicles
the
test
level
total
particulate
('
86.110­
90)
shall
be
reported
in
the
table
format
tmeas_
in.
dbf.
The
fields
shall
be
populated
as
follows:

!
"
PMT_
CFR110"
shall
be
reported
as
tmeas_
in.
meas_
id.

!
The
laboratory
test
id
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
tmeas_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id
and
the
same
as
that
in
dynob_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id.

!
Test
level
emissions
in
milligrams
per
mile
for
the
particulate
emissions
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
tmeas_
in.
measure.

Bag
(
phase)
level
test
data
shall
be
reported
for
laboratory
values
in
the
table
format
bag_
in.
dbf
where
the
fields
shall
be
populated
as
follows:

!
The
bag
(
phase)
number,
"
1"
,
"
2"
or
"
3"
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
bag_
in.
bag_
num.

!
The
laboratory
test
id
used
for
the
test
level
information
shall
be
reported
in
bag_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id
and
the
same
as
that
in
dyno_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id.

!
The
average
barometric
pressure
in
inches
of
mercury
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
bag_
in.
bag_
baro.

!
The
average
test
cell
temperature
in
degrees
F
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
bag_
in.
bag_
temp.

!
The
average
test
cell
humidity
in
grains
of
water
per
pound
of
dry
air
at
60
°
F
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
bag_
in.
bag_
humid.

!
The
total
simulated
distance
traveled
by
the
vehicle
per
phase
in
miles
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
bag_
in.
bag_
dist.

!
Total
hydrocarbon
shall
be
reported
as
grams
per
mile
in
the
field
bag_
in.
bag_
thc.

!
Carbon
monoxide
shall
be
reported
as
grams
per
mile
in
the
field
bag_
in.
bag_
co.

!
Carbon
dioxide
shall
be
reported
as
grams
per
mile
in
the
field
bag_
in.
bag_
co2.

!
Oxides
of
nitrogen
shall
be
reported
as
grams
per
mile
in
the
field
bag_
in.
bag_
nox.

!
The
vehicle's
fuel
consumption
in
miles
per
gallon
per
phase
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
bag_
in.
bag_
mpg.

The
phase
(
bag)
level
methane
emissions
shall
be
reported
in
the
table
format
bmeas_
in.
dbf.
The
fields
Appendix
A.
1
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Entry
Instructions
for
Kansas
City
PM
Vehicle
Testing
shall
be
populated
as
follows:

!
The
phase
(
bag)
number
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
bmeas_
in.
bag_
num.

!
"
METHANE"
shall
be
reported
as
bmeas_
in.
meas_
id
if
measured.

!
The
laboratory
test
id
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
bmeas_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id
and
the
same
as
that
in
dyno_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id.

!
The
phase
(
bag)
methane
emissions
in
grams
per
mile
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
bmeas_
in.
measure.

The
phase
(
bag)
level
amount
of
work
exerted
by
the
dyno
in
brake
horsepower
hour
emissions
shall
be
reported
in
the
table
format
bmeas_
in.
dbf.
The
fields
shall
be
populated
as
follows:

!
The
phase
(
bag)
number
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
bmeas_
in.
bag_
num.

!
"
BHPH"
shall
be
reported
as
bmeas_
in.
meas_
id.

!
The
laboratory
test
id
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
bmeas_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id
and
the
same
as
that
in
dyno_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id.

!
The
phase
(
bag)
work
performed
by
the
dynamometer
in
brake
horsepower
hour
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
bmeas_
in.
measure.

For
SI
vehicles
the
phase
(
bag)
level
total
particulate
('
86.110­
90)
shall
be
reported
in
the
table
format
bmeas_
in.
dbf.
The
fields
shall
be
populated
as
follows:

!
The
phase
(
bag)
number
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
bmeas_
in.
bag_
num.

!
"
PMT_
CFR110"
shall
be
reported
as
bmeas_
in.
meas_
id.

!
The
laboratory
test
id
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
bmeas_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id
and
the
same
as
that
in
dynob_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id.

!
Test
level
emissions
in
milligrams
per
mile
for
the
particulate
emissions
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
bmeas_
in.
measure.

Second
by
second
emission
data
for
the
laboratory
test
measurement
shall
be
reported
in
the
table
format
time_
in.
dbf
where
the
fields
shall
be
populated
as
follows:

!
The
accumulated
test
time
in
seconds
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
time_
in.
dynosecs.

!
The
laboratory
test
id
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
time_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id
and
the
same
as
that
in
dyno_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id.
Appendix
A.
1
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Entry
Instructions
for
Kansas
City
PM
Vehicle
Testing
!
The
average
speed
for
the
measured
unit
of
time
(
1
second)
shall
be
reported
in
miles
per
hour
in
the
field
time_
in.
speed.

!
The
simulated
distance
traveled
by
the
vehicle
for
the
measured
unit
of
time
(
1
second)
in
miles
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
time_
in.
dist.

!
Total
hydrocarbon
for
the
measured
unit
of
time
(
1
second)
shall
be
reported
in
grams
per
second
in
the
field
time_
in.
r_
thc.

!
Carbon
monoxide
for
the
measured
unit
of
time
(
1
second)
shall
be
reported
in
grams
per
second
in
the
field
time_
in.
r_
co.

!
Oxides
of
nitrogen
for
the
measured
unit
of
time
(
1
second)
shall
be
reported
in
grams
per
second
in
the
field
time_
in.
r_
nox.

!
Carbon
dioxide
for
the
measured
unit
of
time
(
1
second)
shall
be
reported
in
grams
per
second
in
the
field
time_
in.
r_
co2.

!
Total
hydrocarbon
accumulated
to
this
time
in
grams
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
time_
in.
w_
thc.

!
Carbon
monoxide
accumulated
to
this
time
in
grams
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
time_
in.
w_
co.

!
Oxides
of
nitrogen
accumulated
to
this
time
in
grams
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
time_
in.
w_
nox.

!
Carbon
dioxide
accumulated
to
this
time
in
grams
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
time_
in.
w_
co2.

!
The
phase
number
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
time_
in.
test_
phase.

The
second
by
second
level
amount
of
work
exerted
by
the
dyno
in
brake
horsepower
hour
emissions
shall
be
reported
in
the
table
format
rmeas_
in.
dbf.
The
fields
shall
be
populated
as
follows:

!
The
accumulated
test
time
in
seconds
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
rmeas_
in.
dynosecs.

!
"
BHPH"
shall
be
reported
as
rmeas_
in.
meas_
id.

!
The
laboratory
test
id
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
rmeas_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id
and
the
same
as
that
in
dyno_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id.

!
The
phase
(
bag)
work
performed
by
the
dynamometer
in
brake
horsepower
hour
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
bmeas_
in.
rep_
meas.

FTP
PEMS
TESTING:
The
test
level
information
shall
be
reported
in
the
table
format
road_
in.
dbf
for
PEMS
values
and
are
to
populated
for
the
as
follows:
Appendix
A.
1
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Entry
Instructions
for
Kansas
City
PM
Vehicle
Testing
!
The
laboratory
test
identifier
shall
be
recorded
in
field
road_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id.
This
must
be
different
from
that
used
in
the
laboratory
delivery
tables
and
unique
overall.

!
"
DROVE"
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
road_
in.
test_
proc.

!
"
KC_
PM"
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
road_
in.
wa_
id.

!
The
initial
FTP
shall
have
the
value
.
F.
entered
into
the
field
road_
in.
replicate.
The
second
FTP
for
the
test
vehicles
shall
have
the
value
.
T.
entered
into
the
field
road_
in.
replicate.

!
The
same
value
use
to
populate
the
field
dynob_
in.
fuel
shall
be
used
to
populate
the
field
road_
in.
fuel.

!
The
value
entered
into
equip_
in.
veh_
ms_
id
for
this
vehicle
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
road_
in.
ms_
id
!
The
test
date
and
time
of
day
shall
be
reported
into
the
fields
road_
in.
test_
date
and
road_
in.
test_
tod
respectively.

!
"
0"
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
road_
in.
disable.

!
AFTP"
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
road_
in.
route.

!
A
unique
identifier
for
the
specific
version
and
model
of
SEMTECH
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
road_
in.
instrsys.

!
The
vehicle's
ETW
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
road_
in.
actweight.

!
The
average
ambient
temperature
in
degrees
F
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
road_
in.
avg_
temp.

!
The
average
humidity
in
of
water
per
pound
of
dry
air
at
60
°
F
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
road_
in.
avg_
humid.

!
The
average
barometric
pressure
in
inches
of
mercury
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
road_
in.
avg_
baro.

!
The
vehicle's
odometer
reading
at
the
start
of
the
test
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
road_
in.
odometer.

!
The
appropriate
value,
selected
from
precond.
precond,
to
represent
the
tests
preconditioning
shall
be
reported
in
the
table
road_
in.
precond.

!
Total
test
time
in
minutes,
including
the
ten
minute
soak
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
road_
in.
timeonroad.

!
The
total
test
distance
in
miles
for
the
FTP
shall
be
entered
in
to
the
field
road_
in.
distance.

!
The
total
work
performed
by
the
engine.
calculated
by
SEMTECH,
and
in
brake
horsepower
hours
shall
Appendix
A.
1
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Entry
Instructions
for
Kansas
City
PM
Vehicle
Testing
be
entered
into
the
field
road_
in.
totalwork.

!
"
0"
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
road_
in.
gallons.

!
The
phase
emissions
in
grams
for
THC
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
road_
in.
w_
thc.

!
The
phase
emissions
in
grams
for
CO
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
road_
in.
w_
co.

!
The
phase
emissions
in
grams
for
CO
2
shall
be
reported
as
in
the
field
road_
in.
w_
co2.

!
The
phase
emissions
in
grams
for
O
2
shall
be
reported
as
in
the
field
road_
in.
w_
o2.

!
The
phase
emissions
in
grams
for
NO
x
shall
be
reported
as
in
the
field
road_
in.
w_
no.

Bag
(
phase)
level
test
data
shall
be
reported
for
SEMTECH
values
in
the
table
format
phase_
in.
dbf
where
the
fields
shall
be
populated
as
follows:

!
The
laboratory
test
identifier
shall
be
recorded
in
field
phase_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id
and
the
same
as
that
in
road_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id.

!
The
bag
(
phase)
number,
"
1"
,
A2"
or
A3"
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
phase_
in.
phase_
no.

!
The
average
ambient
temperature
in
degrees
F
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
phase_
in.
avg_
temp.

!
The
average
humidity
in
of
water
per
pound
of
dry
air
at
60
°
F
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
phase_
in.
avg_
humid.

!
The
average
barometric
pressure
in
inches
of
mercury
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
phase_
in.
avg_
baro.

!
Total
test
time
in
minutes,
including
the
ten
minute
soak
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
phase_
in.
timeonroad.

!
The
total
test
distance
in
miles
for
the
FTP
shall
be
entered
in
to
the
field
phase_
in.
distance.

!
The
total
work
performed
by
the
engine,
as
calculated
by
SEMTECH,
and
in
brake
horsepower
hour
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
phase_
in.
totalwork.

!
The
gallons
of
fuels
for
this
phase
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
phase_
in.
gallons.

!
The
phase
emissions
in
grams
for
THC
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
phase_
in.
w_
thc.

!
The
phase
emissions
in
grams
for
CO
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
phase_
in.
w_
co.

!
The
phase
emissions
in
grams
for
CO
2
shall
be
reported
as
in
the
field
phase_
in.
w_
co2.
Appendix
A.
1
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Entry
Instructions
for
Kansas
City
PM
Vehicle
Testing
!
The
phase
emissions
in
grams
for
O
2
shall
be
reported
as
in
the
field
phase_
in.
w_
o2.

!
The
phase
emissions
in
grams
for
NO
x
shall
be
reported
as
in
the
field
phase_
in.
w_
no.

!
The
start
emissions
shall
be
reported
as
"
YES"
in
the
field
phase_
in.
start_
emis
for
phase
1
and
3.
The
start
emissions
shall
be
reported
as
"
NO"
in
the
field
phase_
in.
start_
emis
for
phase
2.

!
AAMBT"
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
phase_
in.
veh_
state
for
phase
1,
AOPERA"
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
phase_
in.
veh_
state
for
phase
2,
and
ATRANS"
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
phase_
in.
veh_
state
for
phase
3.

Second
by
second
emission
data
for
the
SEMTECH
shall
be
reported
in
the
table
format
rtime_
in.
dbf
where
the
fields
shall
be
populated
as
follows:

!
The
laboratory
test
id
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id
and
the
same
as
that
in
road_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id.

!
The
accumulated
test
time
in
seconds
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
roadsecs.

!
The
phase
number
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
phase_
no.

!
The
average
vehicle
speed
for
the
measured
unit
of
time
(
1
second)
shall
be
reported
in
miles
per
hour
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
roadspeed.

!
The
average
engine
vehicle
speed
for
the
measured
unit
of
time
(
1
second)
shall
be
reported
in
rpm
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
enginerpm.

!
The
average
engine
torque
for
the
measured
unit
of
time
(
1
second)
shall
be
reported
in
foot
pounds
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
roadtorque.

!
The
average
ambient
temperature
for
the
measured
unit
of
time
(
1
second)
shall
be
reported
in
degrees
F
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
roadtemp.

!
Total
hydrocarbon
for
the
measured
unit
of
time
(
1
second)
shall
be
reported
in
grams
per
second
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
r_
thc.

!
Carbon
monoxide
for
the
measured
unit
of
time
(
1
second)
shall
be
reported
in
grams
per
second
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
r_
co.

!
Oxides
of
Nitrogen
for
the
measured
unit
of
time
(
1
second)
shall
be
reported
in
grams
per
second
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
r_
no.

!
Carbon
dioxide
for
the
measured
unit
of
time
(
1
second)
shall
be
reported
in
grams
per
second
in
the
field
time_
in.
r_
co2.
Appendix
A.
1
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Entry
Instructions
for
Kansas
City
PM
Vehicle
Testing
!
Oxygen
for
the
measured
unit
of
time
(
1
second)
shall
be
reported
in
grams
per
second
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
r_
o2.

LA92
­
LABORATORY
TESTING:
The
LA92
shall
be
run
as
a
three
phase
test.
The
test
level
information
shall
be
reported
as
the
same
as
the
FTP
data
in
the
table
format
dyno_
in.
dbf
for
laboratory
values
except
that;

!
"
LA92"
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
dyno_
in.
test_
proc.

!
The
appropriate
value
for
the
preconditioning,
"
505HS",
"
LA4"
or
"
FTP",
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
dyno_
in.
precond
depending
on
if
any
preconditioning
was
performed
to
keep
the
vehicle
"
fully
warmed."

!
The
LA92
is
a
three
phase
(
bag)
test
with
physical
bags,
therefore
the
test
level
emissions
and
the
phase
(
bag)
level
emissions
for
THC,
CO,
NOx,
and
CO
2
are
equivalent
and
shall
be
reported
the
same
in
dyno_
in.
dbf
and
bag_
in.
dbf
respectively.
"
1,
2
or
3"
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
bag_
in.
bag_
num.

!
Second­
by­
second
data
shall
be
reported
the
same
as
for
an
FTP.

LA92
­
SEMTECH
TESTING:
The
test
level
information
shall
be
reported
in
the
table
format
road_
in.
dbf
for
SEMTECH
values
and
are
same
as
the
FTP
data
except
that;

!
"
LA92"
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
road_
in.
route.

!
The
total
test
distance
in
miles
for
the
LA92
shall
be
entered
in
to
the
field
road_
in.
distance.

!
The
road_
in.
gallons
value
shall
be
the
same
value
entered
into
the
field
phase_
in.
gallons.

!
LA92
emissions
in
grams
for
THC
in
the
field
road_
in.
w_
thc
shall
be
reported
the
same
as
the
emissions
reported
in
phase_
in.
w_
thc.

!
LA92
emissions
in
grams
for
CO
in
the
field
road_
in.
w_
co
shall
be
reported
the
same
as
the
emissions
reported
in
phase_
in.
w_
co.

!
LA92
emissions
in
grams
for
CO
2
in
the
field
road_
in.
w_
co2
shall
be
reported
the
same
as
the
emissions
reported
in
phase_
in.
w_
co2.

!
LA92
emissions
in
grams
for
O
2
in
the
field
road_
in.
w_
o2
shall
be
reported
the
same
as
the
emissions
reported
in
phase_
in.
w_
o2.

!
LA92
emissions
in
grams
for
NOx
in
the
field
road_
in.
w_
no
shall
be
reported
the
same
as
the
emissions
reported
in
phase_
in.
w_
no.
Appendix
A.
1
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Entry
Instructions
for
Kansas
City
PM
Vehicle
Testing
The
bag(
phase)
level
test
data
shall
be
reported
in
the
table
format
phase_
in.
dbf
for
SEMTECH
values
and
are
same
as
the
FTP
data
except
that;

!
The
bag
(
phase)
number
shall
be
"
1"
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
phase_
in.
bag_
num.

!
The
start
emissions
shall
be
reported
as
"
NO"
in
the
field
phase_
in.
start_
emis.

!
"
OPERA"
shall
be
reported
in
the
field
phase_
in.
veh_
state.

SEMTECH
FIELD
DATA
The
field
data
for
all
the
light
duty
vehicles
are
recorded
and
the
same
manner
as
in
the
laboratory.
To
capture
the
length
of
time
the
vehicle
is
sampled
the
table
actty_
in.
dbf
is
populated
in
the
following
manner;

!
The
sampling
period
shall
be
identified
by
the
contractor
by
a
unique
character
string
in
the
field
actty_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id.

!
"
KC_
PM"
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
actty_
in.
wa_
id.

!
The
value
entered
in
equip_
in.
veh_
ms_
id
for
this
vehicle
is
entered
into
the
field
actty_
in.
ms_
id
!
The
date
and
time
of
the
installation
is
entered
into
the
field
actty_
in.
install_
dt.

!
If
the
vehicle
has
an
hour
meter
it's
value
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
actty_
in.
install_
hrm.

!
If
this
vehicle
has
been
sampled
before
under
the
same
procurement
the
field
actty_
in.
replicate
shall
be
>.
T.'.
Otherwise
the
field
shall
be
marked
as
>.
F.'

!
If
the
odometer
reading
at
the
time
of
the
installation
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
actty_
in.
instal_
odm.

!
At
the
end
of
the
sample
period
the
data
and
time
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
actty_
in.
unstall_
dt,
the
odometer
reading
inactty_
in.
unstal_
odm,
and
the
hour
meter
reader
in
the
the
fieldactty_
in.
unstl_
hrm.

The
sample
shall
capture
the
concept
of
trips,
which
are
periods
between
engine
on
and
engine
off
where
the
engine
is
running.
That
data
shall
be
captured
in
the
table
trip_
in.
dbf
and
populated
as
follows;

!
A
unique
identifier
for
each
trip
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
trip_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id.

!
The
value
of
the
trips
associated
sample
with
the
shall
be
captured
by
recording
its
actty_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id
in
trip_
in.
activityid.
Appendix
A.
1
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Entry
Instructions
for
Kansas
City
PM
Vehicle
Testing
!
A
gross
fuel
identifier
that
is
appropriate
from
the
fuel.
fuel_
id
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
trip_
in.
fuel_
id.

!
If
fuel
analysis
information
is
available
the
fuel
batch
identifier
for
the
fuel
analysis
data
captured
in
the
table
fbat_
in.
dbf
is
entered
into
the
field
trip_
in.
fbatch_
id.

!
The
date
and
time
of
the
beginning
of
the
trip
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
trip_
in.
tstart_
dt.

!
The
date
and
time
of
the
end
of
the
trip
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
trip_
in.
tend_
dt.

!
A
unique
identifier
of
the
vehicle
operator
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
trip_
in.
operatortp.

!
Any
change
in
the
instrument
configuration
done
for
this
trip
shall
be
done
so
with
a
unique
instrument
configuration
character
string
in
the
field
trip_
in.
ins_
config.

!
An
estimate
of
vehicle
load
in
passengers
in
the
case
of
motor
vehicle
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
trip_
in.
passengers.

!
An
estimate
of
the
vehicle's
payload
including
passengers
and
cargo
shall
be
estimated
to
the
nearest
pound
in
the
fiel
trip_
in.
payload.

The
second
by
second
data
shall
be
captured
in
the
table
rtime_
in.
dbf
and
shall
be
populated
as
follows;

!
The
value
of
the
trip_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
rtime_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id.

!
The
value
of
the
trips
associated
sample
shall
be
captured
by
recording
its
rtime_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id
in
trip_
in.
activityid.

!
The
running
sequential
time
in
seconds
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
trip_
secs.

!
The
one
second
average
vehicle
speed
in
miles
per
hour
for
the
associated
rtime_
in.
trip_
secs
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
trip_
speed.

!
The
one
second
average
engine
speed
in
rpm
for
the
associated
rtime_
in.
trip_
secs
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
trip_
rpm.

!
The
one
second
average
engine
torque
in
foot
pounds
for
the
associated
rtime_
in.
trip_
secs
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
trip_
torq.

!
The
one
second
average
engine
torque
in
foot
pounds
for
the
associated
rtime_
in.
trip_
secs
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
trip_
torq.

!
The
one
second
average
ambient
air
temperature
in
degrees
F
for
the
associated
rtime_
in.
trip_
secs
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
trip_
tempf.
Appendix
A.
1
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Entry
Instructions
for
Kansas
City
PM
Vehicle
Testing
!
The
one
second
average
ambient
air
temperature
in
degrees
C
for
the
associated
rtime_
in.
trip_
secs
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
trip_
temp.

!
The
one
second
average
barometer
in
inches
of
mercury
for
the
associated
rtime_
in.
trip_
secs
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
trip_
baro.

!
The
one
second
average
barometer
in
kPa
for
the
associated
rtime_
in.
trip_
secs
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
inst_
baro.

!
The
one
second
average
humidity
in
grains
of
water
per
pound
of
dry
air
for
the
associated
rtime_
in.
trip_
secs
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
trip_
humid.

!
The
one
second
average
latitude
in
degrees
for
the
associated
rtime_
in.
trip_
secs
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
trip_
lat.

!
The
one
second
average
longitude
in
degrees
for
the
associated
rtime_
in.
trip_
secs
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
trip_
long.

!
The
one
second
average
altitude
in
feet
for
the
associated
rtime_
in.
trip_
secs
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
trip_
alt.

!
The
one
second
average
grade
in
percent
for
the
associated
rtime_
in.
trip_
secs
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
trip_
grade.

!
The
one
second
average
mass
air
flow
thru
the
vehicle's
engine
in
standard
cubic
feet
per
second
for
the
associated
rtime_
in.
trip_
secs
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
trip_
massf.

!
The
one
second
engine
fuel
rate
in
pounds
per
second
for
the
associated
rtime_
in.
trip_
secs
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
fuel_
rate.

!
The
one
second
thc,
co,
nox,
and
oxygen
emission
in
grams
for
the
associated
rtime_
in.
trip_
secs
shall
be
recorded
in
the
fields
rtime_
in.
trip_
thc,
rtime_
in.
trip_
co,
rtime_
in.
trip_
co2,
rtime_
in.
trip_
nox,
and
rtime_
in.
trip_
o2.

!
The
one
second
engine
coolant
temperature
in
degrees
F
for
the
associated
rtime_
in.
trip_
secs
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
eng_
cool.

!
The
one
second
engine
oil
temperature
in
degrees
F
for
the
associated
rtime_
in.
trip_
secs
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
rtime_
in.
eng_
oil.

Non­
core
measurements
at
the
second­
by
second
level
are
recorded
in
the
table
pmeas_
in.
dbf.
They
are
recorded
by
entering
into
each
record;

!
The
value
of
the
trip_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id
shall
be
entered
into
the
field
pmeas_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id.
Appendix
A.
1
Mobile
Source
Observation
Data
Entry
Instructions
for
Kansas
City
PM
Vehicle
Testing
!
The
value
of
the
trips
associated
sample
shall
be
captured
by
recording
its
pmeas_
in.
ctr_
tst_
id
in
trip_
in.
activityid.

!
The
running
sequential
time
in
seconds
shall
be
recorded
in
the
field
pmeas_
in.
trip_
secs.

The
associated
value
for
pmeas_
in.
meas_
id
for
the
various
analytes
measured
on
a
second
by
second
basis
are
found
in
the
attached
table;

Measurement
meas_
id
Units
AC
Compressor
On
or
off
ac_
on_
off
None
AC
Load
ac_
load
watts
Throttle
Position
throttle_
p
percent
Exhaust
Temperature
(
degrees
F)
exh_
temp
Degrees
F
Intake
Manifold
Pressure
intake_
mfp
Inches
of
Mercury
Transmission
Gear
trans_
gear
None
The
measurements
themselves
shall
be
stored
in
the
field
pmeas_
in.
meas_
value.
The
ac
compressor
status
shall
be
characterizes
as
"
0"
as
off
and
"
1"
as
on.
The
transmission
gear
shall
be
characterized
by
­
1
for
reverse,
0
for
neutral,
1,
2,3
etc
for
forward
gears.
Appendix
B
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Appendix
B
Sample
Size
Estimation
As
mentioned
in
the
proposal,
the
sample
size
was
derived
in
three
steps,
as
described
below.

73.
Estimate
initial
sample
size
(
n
SRS).
The
initial
sample
size
was
calculated
under
the
following
assumptions:

­
The
sample
will
be
large
enough
that
large
sample
theory
applies,
i.
e.,
the
sampling
distribution
of
the
mean(
s)
will
be
approximately
normal.
­
Vehicles
would
be
drawn
from
the
population
using
simple
random
sampling
(
SRS).
­
The
objective
is
to
estimate
the
fleet
average
PM
emissions
rate
(
g/
mi),
to
within
20%
margin
of
error
(
E)
at
a
95%
level
of
confidence
(
associated
t­
statistic
is
1.96).
­
The
population
variance
is
estimated
by
a
coefficient
of
variation
(
CV)
of
250%.
This
value
is
intended
to
be
conservative,
adopted
from
a
study
in
Denver
that
included
winter
as
well
as
summer
measurements
in
a
sample
heavily
weighted
towards
older
vehicles.

The
initial
estimate
is
thus
calculated
as:

vehicles
600
20
.
0
96
.
1
5
.
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
SRS
=
 
=
 
=
E
t
CV
n
78.
Estimate
the
effective
sample
size
(
n
strat).
The
effective
sample
size
reflects
the
expected
gain
in
precision
from
use
of
the
age­
by­
vehicle­
class
stratification.
It
is
calculated
as
78
.
0
9014
.
0
7000
.
0
deff
where
,
deff
2
SRS
mean,
2
strat
mean,
SRS
strat
=
=
=
 
=

s
s
n
n
This
result
suggests
that
the
proposed
stratified
sampling
should
allow
us
to
achieve
the
stated
precision
objective
with
~
20%
fewer
vehicles
than
we
would
expect
using
SRS,
i.
e.,
with
480
as
opposed
to
600
vehicles.
The
"
design
effect"
(
deff)
represents
the
reduction
in
the
variance
of
the
mean
achieved
through
stratification.
Note
that
variances
in
the
equation
are
the
estimated
variances
of
the
sampling
distribution
of
the
mean,
not
the
population
variance.
For
this
analysis,
the
estimated
variances
were
calculated
using
a
set
of
data
collected
in
the
SCAQMD
(
Norbeck
et
al.
1998).
The
data
used
represent
a
subset
of
vehicles
identified
as
"
normal"
emitters,
as
these
vehicles
were
recruited
randomly
in
the
context
of
the
NCHRP.
Thus,
we
assume
that
these
vehicles
give
a
rough
indication
of
the
relative
sizes
of
the
age­
class
and
vehicle­
class
strata,
as
defined
in
Tables
1
and
2
below.

Our
estimated
variance
of
the
mean
under
SRS
assumptions
is
simply
the
estimated
population
variance
divided
by
the
total
sample
size,
or
Appendix
B
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
1
Kish,
L.
(
1965).
Survey
Sampling.
John
Wiley
&
Sons,
New
York.
n
s
s
2
SRS
2
SRS
mean,
=

where
the
estimated
population
variance
is
calculated
using
the
available
data
but
disregarding
the
age
classes
under
which
it
was
collected.
We
estimate
variance
of
the
mean
under
stratification
(
s2
mean,
strat)
by
calculating
a
weighted
variance
from
the
variances
of
the
mean
in
each
stratum
h
(
s2
mean,
h),
as
follows
(
Kish,
1965)
1:

=
=
 
=







=
6
1
2
,
mean
2
6
1
2
2
2
,
h
h
h
h
h
h
h
strat
mean
s
W
n
s
W
s
The
stratum
weight
W
h
is
intended
to
serve
as
an
estimate
of
the
relative
size
of
the
stratum,
and
is
this
case
was
calculated
as
number
of
observations
in
each
stratum
from
the
SCAQMD
dataset,
here
denoted
as
m
h.

=
=
6
1
h
h
h
h
m
m
W
79.
Allocate
the
Effective
Sample
among
Strata.
To
divide
the
proposed
sample
among
the
six
strata,
again
using
the
observations
from
the
SCAQMD
data
(
m
h)
as
a
guide.
We
have
used
Neyman
allocation,
which
assigns
sub­
samples
based
on
the
product
of
the
stratum
size
m
h
and
stratum
standard
deviation
s
h.
This
allocation
is
designed
to
optimize
the
resulting
precision
for
the
given
total
sample
size.
The
optimal
sample
within
each
stratum
n
h,
opt
is
given
as









=

=
6
1
strat
opt
,

h
h
h
h
h
h
m
s
m
s
n
n
Finally,
the
raw
optimal
stratum
samples
were
rounded
and
adjusted
slightly
to
reduce
larger
differences
between
strata
given
by
the
optimization.
Final
adjusted
stratum
samples
are
denoted
as
n
h,
adj
and
presented
in
Table
2.
Appendix
B
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Table
1.
Definition
of
Strata
by
Vehicle
and
Age
Class
Stratum
(
h)
Vehicle
Class
Age
Class3
1
Truck
1
Pre
1981
2
Truck
1981­
19904
3
Truck
1991
and
newer
4
Car
2
Pre
1981
5
Car
1981­
19904
6
Car
1991
and
newer
1
Includes
LDGT1
and
LDGT2
vehicle
classes.
2
Includes
LDGV
vehicle
classes.
3
Following
Norbeck
et
al.
(
1998)
and
Cadle
et
al.
(
1999).
4
Authors
designated
two
strata,
1981­
85
and
1986­
90.
These
were
collapsed,
due
to
a
close
similarity
in
mean
PM
rates.

Table
2
Estimated
Sample
Size
and
Allocation
Among
Age
and
Vehicle­
Class
Strata
Allocation
Stratum
mh
mean
Varianc
e
(
s2
h)
St
d.

De
v.

(
s
h)
CV
Var(

mean)(

s
2
m
ea
n
,

h)
SE
(
smean,
h)
Wh
n
h,
opt
n
h,
adj
n
h,

a
dj
(

%)

1
2
30.34
556.95
26.

30
0.

78
278.48
16.69
0.0222
40.52
50
1
0.

4
2
15
9.30
165.66
1
2.

87
1.

38
11.04
3.32
0.167
165.78
140
2
9.

2
3
22
3.15
9.59
3.

10
0.

98
0.44
0.66
0.244
58.50
70
1
4.

6
4
2
25.00
482.34
21.

9
0.

88
241.
15.53
0.0222
37.72
40
8
.
3
Appendix
B
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
6
1
7
5
15
3.22
10.56
3.

25
1.

01
0.70
0.84
0.167
41.86
50
1
0.

4
6
34
1.93
21.58
4
.

65
2.

41
0.63
0.80
0.378
135.62
130
2
7.

1
Total
90
480
Notation:

Std.
Dev.
=
Standard
Deviation
CV
=
Coefficient
of
variation,
defined
as
Std.
Dev./
mean.
Var(
mean)
=
Variance
of
the
sampling
distribution
of
the
mean,
=
variance/
n
for
each
stratum.
SE
=
Standard
Error
of
the
mean,
defined
as
SE/ 
n.
W
=
stratum
weight,
defined
as
n/
 n,
for
each
stratum.
n
h,
opt
=
raw
sub­
sample
in
each
stratum
as
assigned
by
Neyman
allocation.
n
h,
adj
=
rounded
sub­
sample
in
each
stratum.
Appendix
C
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Appendix
D
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Appendice
D
­
OTAG's
Government
Furnished
Property
List
Instrument
Manufacturer
EPA
ID
S/
N
Cost
Diesel
Particulate
Monitor
(
DPM),
Model
1105A
Rupprecht
&

Pataschnick
Co.,

Inc.
792787
1105A201479907
$
39,647
with
computer
DPM
Computer
and
Monitor
?
79278
7­
2
79278
7­
3
032333021
H051J7000434
See
DPM
Dewpoint
Generator,

Model
DG­
1,
Plus
auxiliary
Equipment:

Hot
Plate,
Model
1103
Dewpoint
Monitor,

Model
M170
Sable
Systems,

Inc.
Jenway
Visala
n/
a
n/
a
n/
a
DG0101­
03
1248
X3550014
$
4,290
$
895
$
2,495
Real
Time
Particulate
Mass
Monitor,
Model
RPM­
101
Booker
Systems,

Ltd.
n/
a
yet
n/
a
$
53,000
DataRam
4000
Thermo­
MIE
Inc.
793003
D055
$
10,550
Portable
Emission
Measurement
Systems
(
PEMS)
Sensors,
Inc.

Semtech
­
D
­
2
Semtech
­
G
­
6
n/
a
yet
$
25,000
­
$
40,000
depending
on
model
type
Appendix
D
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Three
Light­
Duty
Vehicles
for
Round
Robin
Testing
Various
Manufacturers
n/
a
yet
$
5,000
­
$
20,000
depending
on
model
Portable
Activity
Measurement
Systems
(
PAMS)
approximately
10
units
n/
a
yet
$
300
per
unit
Auxiliaries
KT1
Plus
Compressor
Kaeser
n/
a
n/
a
$
2,500
Heated
Sample
Valve
System
Burkert
n/
a
n/
a
$
4,500
Valve
Control
System
EPA
n/
a
n/
a
$
1,200
Heated
Lines
and
Controllers
Unique
Products
n/
a
n/
a
$
12,000
n/
a
­
Not
Assigned
Appendix
D
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Appenidces
D
­
ORD's
Government
Furnished
Property
(
Dynamometer
and
Other
Equipment)

Item
Manufacturer
Model
#
Serial
(
ID)
#
EPA
#

Trailer
Haulmark
G816B3­
102
4XSGB1629Y
G022365
Instrument
rack,

(
42"
x71"
x28")

CO2
Instrument
Horiba
AIA­
210
569687041
911710
CO(
H)
Instrument
Horiba
AIA­
210
56884301
911711
Nox
Instrument
Horiba
CLA220
573834033
969210
Hydrocarbon
Instrument
Horiba
FIA236
850624012
Hydrocarbon
Instrument
Horiba
FIA34A
850584012
Hydrocarbon
Instrument
Horiba
OPE435
850658077
CO
Instrument,

optical
Horiba
AIA23AS
850988014
CO
Instrument,

electronics
Horiba
OPE135
850658014
Digital
Meter
LFE
Appendix
D
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Meter,
temperature
Omega
DP205TC
Meter,
temperature
Omega
DP205TC
3081342
Meter,
temperature
Omega
DP205TC
3081329
2
Meters,
digital
Newport
2AP2
Meter,
digital
Cole­
Parmer
7350­
38
17524­
17­
1287
Pressure
Transducer
Data
Instruments
SA
3488­
0017
Temperature
Controller
Unique
Products
223­
1531
6336
Temperature
Controller
Unique
Products
223­
1531
Computer
Mitsuba
1239933
n/
a
928752
Monitor
Dell
D1028L
66746JA56K
Computer
mouse
Kentronix
10017631
Printer
Hewitt
Packard
Deskjet
932C
NX0C61SOHZ
Keyboard
Chicony
KB5181
TCK3C08137
Monitor
Axion
CL­
1566
CB266AS0074
4
Instrument
Rack
(
24"
x24"
x74")
Appendix
D
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Heated
Line
Unique
Products
S11B4240TM
AA1
Temperature
Controller
Unique
Products
223­
1531
4878
Temperature
Controller
Unique
Products
Refrigerator
Whirlpool
EL05CCXJW
EE0218193
Chair
Chair
VGA
distribution
amplifier
Extron
P/
2
DA2
Plus
249005
Headphones
David
Clark
Co.
H5030
12511G­
01
Headphones
David
Clark
Co.
H5040
16298G­
03
Headphones
David
Clark
Co.
H5030
Readout
box
Tylan
RO32
FP901021
Mass
Flow
Controller
Tylan
FC280
AW801070
Instrument
Rack
(
74"
x24"
x24")
Appendix
D
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Monitor
Mitsuba
CM43
353JR000U006
44
Drivers
Aid
Horiba
SADA
2040
270188
9443501
911694
Computer
Hewlett
Packard
VL2
3436A00341
Digital
Readout
box
Tylan
RO28
F0604019
Mass
Flow
Controller
Tylan
FC280
AW801200
Mass
Flow
Controller
Tylan
FC280
AW801201
Mass
Flow
Controller
Tylan
FC280
AW805124
Mass
Flow
Controller
Tylan
FC280
AW507001
Keyboard
Qtronix
QX901
903000755
Rack
Power
Strip
Flexiduct
BR06010
NXX300120
Rack
Power
Strip
Flexiduct
SP12410
BXX300022
Instrument
manuals
in
3­
ring
binder
Winch,
electric
Dayton
4Z327A
Appendix
D
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Regulator,
gas
National
Welders
3104C
Regulator,
gas
National
Welders
HPT270C
A217254
Regulator,
gas
National
Welders
HPT270­
125­

590­
DK
Regulator,
gas
National
Welders
HPT2700
E227323
Regulator,
gas
Nox
660
Regulator,
gas
National
Welders
HPT272C
KY37784
Regulator,
gas
National
Welders
GPT2700
GA33049
Regulator,
gas
National
Welders
HPT270C
FZ13512
Bag
Rack
w/
8
Tedlar
bags
Horiba
Air
Pump
Metal
Bellows
MB­
21
10545
Air
Pump
Thomas
1107CM75
0000187
Air
Pump
Gast
0523­
V191QG582DX
9802803610
Air
Pump
Gast
0523­
V191QG582DX
9812011058
Appendix
D
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Air
Pump
Gast
0523­
V191QG588DX
1002119130
Air
Pump
Thomas
607CA22
Air
Pump
Thomas
607CA22
Air
Pump
Thomas
607CA22
Relay
and
Solenoid
Rack
Temperature
Controller
Unique
Products
223­
2219
13202
Temperature
Controller
Unique
Products
223­
2219J
7813
Temperature
Controller
Unique
Products
223­
1531
4748
Heated
Line,
20'
x
1/
4
"
Unique
Products
Heated
Line,
20'
x
1/
4"
Unique
Products
Heated
Line,
20'
x
1/
4"
Unique
Products
Heated
Line,
50'
x
3/
8"
Unique
Products
Heated
Filter
Unique
Products
FLT1584BB6
AAJ­
000
13203
Appendix
D
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Heated
Filter
(
on
order)
Cyclone,
ss
(
on
order)
URG
Cyclone,
ss
(
on
order)
URG
(
2)
Power
Cables,

50'
240V,
50
amp
Condenser
Tecumsek
AE3Y14AA
9A1768096
(
2)
Winches
Dayton
4Z327A
Miscellaneous
tools
Miscellaneous
office
supplies
Miscellaneous
electrical
supplies
Miscellaneous
tubing
Miscellaneous
swaglock
fittings
Miscellaneous
hardware
Space
heater
Appendix
D
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Miscellaneous
padlocks
Item
Manufacturer
Model
#
Serial
(
ID)
#
EPA
#

Trailer
Fruehauf
C6HE­
Y2
DLR503307
807534
Air
Cooler
C810B
12936
Air
Compressor
2800061DUA0
01
45929NSO423
02
Air
Compressor
Motor
Dayton
6K827L
C63GKE­

4555J977
Positive
Displacement
Pump
(
PDP)
Suterbilt
5­
LP
5085736
PDP
Motor
GE
MOTORS
5KC184BB211
NPY300
Dynamometer
(
Electronic
controller,
rolls,

and
flywheels
Clayton
CTE­
50
RLC­
175
807535
1­
carpenter's
level,

4'
15­
trailer
jack
stands
Appendix
D
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
Weight
calibration
set,
45lb.,
10
lb.

and
arbor
5
pieces
of
18"

chain
2
Ramps,
aluminum
(
8'
x12')

Fan
Hartzell
Fan
motor
Reliance
CS
C56E1768MDZ
Muffler
Burgess
Manning
BEO­
3.5
52­
170­
0
4
Aluminum
ramps
(
7.5'
x
18")
Metro
Trailer
Manuf.

Aluminum
ramp
(
2'
x12')

8"
OD
Tunnel,

stainless
steel,
10'

and
12'
sections
Flexible
tube,

3"
x14'
braided,

stainless
steel
Appendix
D
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lead
PR
Number:
PR­
CI­
04­
10377
4"
OD
Tunnel,

stainless
steel
sections,
total
~
8'

Flexible
tube
(
4"
x4'

)
Filter
housing
(
2'
x2'

aluminum)

Tube
elbow,

stainless
steel
(
8"
x24")

Winch
Dayton
6X190B
X1059057
Winch
post,
6'

aluminum
Water
pump
FP6121­
00
1E95B
Floor
Jack
(
6)
Dilution
tunnel
support
stands
(
2)
Jack
stands
for
ramps
Dilution
air
heater
Unique
Products
507574
8014
Steel
Toolbox,

36"
x18"
x18"
Payload
Appendix
D
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lea
(
4)
Metal
Leg
stands
(
26)
silicon
boots,
11"

(
5)
Nylon,
rachet
style
tie­
down
straps
Wire
cable
with
hooks,
8'

(
5)
2000
lb
chain
binders
(
1)
5400
lb
chain
binder
Nustar
Power
Pusher
44518
933311
(
6)
Straps,
load
binder
Appendix
D
Contract:
GS­
10F­
0036K,
Task
Order:
1104
Lea