Document ID: SEC-2023-0897-0001
Agency: sec
Document Type: Notice
Title: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes: Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.
Posted Date: 2023-08-18T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 159 (Friday, August 18, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56681-56685]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-17756]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-98126; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2023-056]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend 
Its Fee Schedule

August 14, 2023.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on August 1, 2023, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or 
``BZX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``BZX'') proposes to 
amend its Fee Schedule. The text of the proposed rule change is 
provided in Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the 
Exchange's website (http://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at 
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set

[[Page 56682]]

forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of 
such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule, effective August 
1, 2023.
    The Exchange first notes that it operates in a highly competitive 
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to 
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be 
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. More specifically, the 
Exchange is only one of 16 options venues to which market participants 
may direct their order flow. Based on publicly available information, 
no single options exchange has more than 16% of the market share.\3\ 
Thus, in such a low-concentrated and highly competitive market, no 
single options exchange, including the Exchange, possesses significant 
pricing power in the execution of option order flow. The Exchange 
believes that the ever-shifting market share among the exchanges from 
month to month demonstrates that market participants can shift order 
flow or discontinue to reduce use of certain categories of products, in 
response to fee changes. Accordingly, competitive forces constrain the 
Exchange's transaction fees, and market participants can readily trade 
on competing venues if they deem pricing levels at those other venues 
to be more favorable. In response to competitive pricing, the Exchange, 
like other options exchanges, offers rebates and assesses fees for 
certain order types executed on or routed through the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Options Monthly Market Volume 
Summary (July 26, 2023), available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/market_statistics/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange's fee schedule sets forth standard rebates and rates 
applied per contract. For example, the Exchange provides a rebate of 
$0.29 per contract for Market Maker orders that add liquidity in Penny 
Securities, yielding fee code PM. Additionally, in response to the 
competitive environment, the Exchange also offers tiered pricing, which 
provides Members opportunities to qualify for higher rebates or reduced 
fees where certain volume criteria and thresholds are met. Tiered 
pricing provides an incremental incentive for Members to strive for 
higher tier levels, which provides increasingly higher benefits or 
discounts for satisfying increasingly more stringent criteria. For 
example, the Exchange currently offers four Market Maker Penny Add 
Volume Tiers (``MM Penny Add Tier'') under footnote 6 of the Fee 
Schedule which provide rebates between $0.31 and $0.43 per contract for 
qualifying Market Maker orders which meet certain add liquidity 
thresholds and yield fee code PM.
    The Exchange proposes to adopt a new MM Penny Add Tier, 
specifically a Market Maker Cross-Asset Add Tier, which requires 
participation on the Exchange's equity options platform (``BZX 
Equities'').\4\ Under the proposed tier, the Exchange would provide a 
rebate of $0.38 per contract where a Member (1) has an ADAV \5\ in 
Market Maker orders greater than or equal to 0.05% of average OCV; \6\ 
(2) has on BZX Equities an ADAV greater than or equal to 0.35% of 
average TCV; \7\ and (3) is the Lead Market Maker (``LMM'') \8\ on BZX 
Equities in at least 50 equity symbols.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Exchange proposes to add this Tier as described in the 
table in Footnote 6 and to the amounts of the rebates in the 
Standard Rates table.
    \5\ ``ADAV'' means average daily added volume calculated as the 
number of contracts added.
    \6\ ``OCV'' means the total equity and ETF options volume that 
clears in the Customer range at the Options Clearing Corporation 
(``OCC'') for the month for which the fees apply, excluding volume 
on any day that the Exchange experiences an Exchange System 
Disruption and on any day with a scheduled early market close.
    \7\ ``TCV'' means total consolidated volume calculated as the 
volume reported by all exchanges and trade reporting facilities to a 
consolidated transaction reporting plan for the month for which the 
fees apply.
    \8\ ``Lead Market Maker'' means a Market Maker registered with 
the Exchange for a particular LMM Security that has committed to 
maintain Minimum Performance Standards in the LMM Security. See Rule 
11.8(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the proposed tier, along with the existing 
tiers, continues to provide an incremental incentive for Members to 
strive for the highest tier levels, which provide increasingly higher 
rebates for such transactions. The proposed thresholds include a 
threshold relating to ADAV in Market Maker orders and cross-asset 
thresholds, which are designed to incentivize Members to achieve 
certain levels of participation on both the Exchange's options and 
equities platforms. Overall, the proposed enhanced rebate and 
corresponding criteria is designed to encourage Members to increase 
their order flow, thereby contributing to a deeper and more liquid 
market, which benefits all market participants and provides greater 
execution opportunities on the Exchange.
    Additionally, the Exchange proposes to modify fees associated with 
certain routing fee codes. The Exchange assesses fees in connection 
with orders routed away to various exchanges. The Fee Schedule 
currently lists fee codes and their corresponding transaction fee for 
certain Customer orders routed to other options exchanges. Currently, 
under the Fee Codes and Associated Fees section of the Fee Schedule, 
fee code RP is appended to routed Customer orders to NYSE American 
(``AMEX''), BOX Options Exchange (``BOX''), Nasdaq BX Options (``BX''), 
Cboe Exchange, Inc. (``Cboe''), Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``EDGX''), 
ISE Mercury, LLC (``ISE Mercury'' or ``MERC''), MIAX Options Exchange 
(``MIAX'') or Nasdaq PHLX LLC (``PHLX'') (excluding orders in SPY 
options) and assesses a charge of $0.25 per contract; fee code RQ is 
appended to routed Customer orders in Penny Program classes to NYSE 
Arca, Inc (``ARCA''), Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc. (``C2''), Nasdaq ISE 
(``ISE''), ISE Gemini, LLC (``ISE Gemini''), MIAX Emerald Exchange 
(``MIAX Emerald''), MIAX Pearl Exchange (``MIAX Pearl''), Nasdaq 
Options Market LLC (``NOM'') or PHLX (including orders in SPY options) 
and assesses a charge of $0.85 per contract; and fee code RR is 
appended to routed Customer orders in Non-Penny classes to ARCA, C2, 
ISE, ISE Gemini, MIAX Emerald, MIAX Pearl or NOM and assesses a charge 
of $1.25.
    The Exchange notes that its current approach to routing fees is to 
set forth in a simple manner certain sub-categories of fees that 
approximate the cost of routing to other options exchanges based on the 
cost of transaction fees assessed by each venue as well as costs to the 
Exchange for routing (i.e., clearing fees, connectivity and other 
infrastructure costs, membership fees, etc.) (collectively, ``Routing 
Costs''). The Exchange then monitors the fees charged as compared to 
the costs of its routing services and adjusts its routing fees and/or 
sub-categories to ensure that the Exchange's fees do indeed result in a 
rough approximation of overall Routing Costs, and are not significantly 
higher or lower in any area. The Exchange notes that other options 
exchanges currently assess routing fees in a similar manner as the 
Exchange's current approach to assessing approximate routing fees.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See e.g., MIAX Options Exchange Fee Schedule, Section 1(c), 
``Fees for Customer Orders Routed to Another Options Exchange.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to amend fee code RP to exclude applicable 
Customer orders routed to ISE Mercury, LLC (i.e., MERC) \10\ and to 
amend fee codes RQ and RR to add applicable Customer

[[Page 56683]]

orders routed to MERC.\11\ The Exchange further proposes to amend fee 
codes RQ and RR to add applicable Customer orders routed to MEMX LLC 
(``MEMX''), in anticipation of the launch of the new options exchange. 
The charges assessed per contract for each fee code remain the same 
under the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The Exchange proposes non-substantive changes to fee code 
RP to rename ``BX Options'' to ``BX'' and ``EDGX Options'' to 
``EDGX.''
    \11\ The Exchange proposes non-substantive changes to fee code 
RQ to rename ``ISE Gemini'' to ``GMNI'', ``MIAX Emerald'' to 
``EMLD'', and ``MIAX Pearl'' to ``PERL.'' The Exchange further 
proposes non-substantive changes to fee code RR to rename ``ISE 
Gemini'' to ``GMNI'', ``MIAX Emerald'' to ``EMLD'', and ``MIAX 
Pearl'' to ``PERL.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed changes result in an assessment of fees that, 
following fee changes by an away options exchange and in anticipation 
of the launch of another options exchange, is more in line with the 
Exchange's current approach to routing fees, that is, in a manner that 
approximates the cost of routing Customer orders to other away options 
exchanges, based on the general cost of transaction fees assessed by 
the sub-category of away options exchanges for such orders (as well as 
the Exchange's Routing Costs).\12\ The Exchange notes that routing 
through the Exchange is optional and that TPHs will continue to be able 
to choose where to route applicable Customer orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97800 (June 26, 
2023), 88 FR 42409 (June 30, 2023) (SR-MRX-2023-11).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and 
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular, 
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\13\ Specifically, the 
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the 
Section 6(b)(5) \14\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be 
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to 
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation 
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, 
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating 
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, 
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally, 
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the 
Section 6(b)(5) \15\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be 
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, 
brokers, or dealers. The Exchange also believes the proposed rule 
change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\16\ which 
requires that Exchange rules provide for the equitable allocation of 
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its Trading Permit 
Holders and other persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \15\ Id.
    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Exchange believes the proposed Market Maker 
Penny Add Volume Tier is reasonable because it provides additional 
opportunities for Members to receive a rebate by providing alternative 
criteria for which they can reach. The Exchange notes that volume-based 
incentives and discounts have been widely adopted by exchanges,\17\ 
including the Exchange,\18\ and are reasonable, equitable and non-
discriminatory because they are open to all Members on an equal basis 
and provide additional benefits or discounts that are reasonably 
related to (i) the value to an exchange's market quality and (ii) 
associated higher levels of market activity, such as higher levels of 
liquidity provision and/or growth patterns. Additionally, as noted 
above, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. The 
Exchange is only one of several options venues to which market 
participants may direct their order flow, and it represents a small 
percentage of the overall market. Competing options exchanges offer 
similar tiered pricing structures to that of the Exchange, including 
schedules of rebates and fees that apply based upon Members achieving 
certain volume and/or growth thresholds. These competing pricing 
schedules, moreover, are presently comparable to those that the 
Exchange provides.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See e.g., Cboe EDGX U.S. Options Exchange Fee Schedule, 
Footnote 2, Market Maker Volume Tiers, which provide reduced fees 
between $0.02 and $0.17 per contract for Market Maker Penny and Non-
Penny orders where Members meet certain volume thresholds.
    \18\ See e.g., Cboe BZX U.S. Options Exchange Fee Schedule, 
Footnotes 6 and 7, Market Maker Penny and Non-Penny Volume Tiers 
which provide enhanced rebates for Market Maker orders where Members 
meet certain volume thresholds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Moreover, the Exchange believes the proposed MM Penny Add Tier is a 
reasonable means to encourage Members to increase their liquidity on 
the Exchange and also their participation on BZX Equities. The Exchange 
believes that adopting tiers with alternative criteria to the existing 
Market Maker Volume Tiers may encourage those Members who could not 
previously achieve the criteria under existing Market Maker Volume 
Tiers 1 through 4 to increase their order flow on BZX Options and 
Equities.
    For example, the proposed tiers would provide an opportunity for 
Members who have an ADAV in Market Makers Orders of at least 0.05% of 
average OCV, but less than the more stringent 0.15% of average OCV (the 
requirement under current Tier 1), to receive a higher rebate than they 
may currently receive but equal or slightly lower than the rebate they 
would receive for reaching the more stringent criteria under current 
Tiers 2 through 4, if they also meet the threshold requirements based 
on BZX Equities participation. Similarly, for Market Makers that 
participate on both BZX Options and Equities, and do not currently meet 
the 0.15% ADAV threshold under current Tier 1, but can or do meet the 
proposed equities thresholds, the proposed tier may incentivize those 
participants to grow their options volume in order to receive enhanced 
rebates. Increased liquidity benefits all investors by deepening the 
Exchange's liquidity pool, offering additional flexibility for all 
investors to enjoy cost savings, supporting the quality of price 
discovery, promoting market transparency and improving investor 
protection. The Exchange also believes that proposed enhanced rebates 
are reasonable based on the difficulty of satisfying the tiers' 
criteria and ensures the proposed rebates and thresholds appropriately 
reflect the incremental difficulty to achieve the existing MM Penny Add 
Tiers. The proposed enhanced rebate amounts also do not represent a 
significant departure from the enhanced rebates currently offered under 
the Exchange's existing MM Penny Add Tiers. Indeed, the proposed 
enhanced rebate amount under the proposed Cross-Asset Add Tier ($0.38) 
is incrementally higher than current Tier 1 ($0.31), which the Exchange 
believes offer slightly less stringent criteria than the proposed 
Cross-Asset Add Tier, but is incrementally lower than the rebate 
offered under existing Tiers 3 and 4 ($0.39 and $0.43, respectively), 
which the Exchange believes is more stringent than the proposed 
criteria under the proposed Cross-Asset Tier. Similarly, the proposed 
enhanced rebate amount under proposed tier ($0.38) is the same as 
current Tier 2 ($0.38), which the Exchange believes reflects a similar 
level of difficulty but using alternative types of criteria. The 
Exchange also notes that the proposed rebates remain within the range 
of the enhanced rebates offered under the current MM Penny Add Tiers 
(i.e., $0.31-$0.43).
    The Exchange believes that the proposal represents an equitable

[[Page 56684]]

allocation of fees and is not unfairly discriminatory because it 
applies uniformly to all Market Makers. Additionally, a number of 
Market Makers have a reasonable opportunity to satisfy the criteria of 
the proposed Cross-Asset Add Tier, which the Exchange believes is less 
stringent than the existing Market Maker Add Penny Tiers 3 and 4. The 
Exchange also believes a number of Market-Makers have a reasonable 
opportunity to satisfy the proposed Cross-Asset Add Tier's criteria, 
which the Exchange believes has a similar level of difficulty to 
current Tier 2 but using alternative types of criteria. While the 
Exchange has no way of knowing whether this proposed rule change would 
definitively result in any particular Market Maker qualifying for the 
proposed tiers, the Exchange anticipates that approximately six Market 
Makers will be able to compete for and achieve the proposed criteria of 
the proposed Cross-Asset Add Tier; however, the proposed tiers are open 
to any Market-Maker that satisfies the applicable tier's criteria. The 
Exchange believes the proposed tiers could provide an incentive for 
other Members to submit additional liquidity on BZX Options and 
Equities to qualify for the proposed enhanced rebates. To the extent a 
Member participates on the Exchange but not on BZX Equities, the 
Exchange does believe that the proposal is still reasonable, equitably 
allocated and non-discriminatory with respect to such Member based on 
the overall benefit to the Exchange resulting from the success of BZX 
Equities. Particularly, the Exchange believes such success allows the 
Exchange to continue to provide and potentially expand its existing 
incentive programs to the benefit of all participants on the Exchange, 
whether they participate on BZX Equities or not. The proposed pricing 
program is also fair and equitable in that membership in BZX Equities 
is available to all market participants, which would provide them with 
access to the benefits on BZX Equities provided by the proposed change, 
even where a member of BZX Equities is not necessarily eligible for the 
proposed enhanced rebates on the Exchange.
    The Exchange also notes that it does not believe the proposed tier 
will adversely impact any Member's pricing or ability to qualify for 
other tiers. Rather, should a Member not meet the proposed criteria, 
the Member will merely not receive the proposed enhanced rebate, and 
has four alternative choices to aim to achieve under the MM Penny Add 
Tiers. Furthermore, the proposed enhanced rebate would apply to all 
Members that meet the required criteria under proposed tier.
    The Exchange also believes the proposed rule change to amend fee 
codes RP, RQ, and RR to account for MERC's current assessment of fees 
for Customer orders and MEMX's expected assessment of fees for Customer 
orders is reasonable because it is reasonably designed to assess 
routing fees in line with the Exchange's current approach to routing 
fees. That is, the proposed rule change is intended to include Customer 
orders in Penny Program and Non-Penny classes routed to MERC and MEMX 
in the most appropriate sub-category of fees that approximates the cost 
of routing to a group of away options exchanges based on the cost of 
transaction fees assessed by each venue as well as Routing Costs to the 
Exchange. As noted above, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive 
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to 
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be 
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. The proposed rule change 
reflects a competitive pricing structure designed to incentivize market 
participants to direct their order flow to the Exchange, which the 
Exchange believes would enhance market quality to the benefit of all 
Members. The Exchange notes that other options exchanges currently 
approximate routing fees in a similar manner as the Exchange's current 
approach.\19\ The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is 
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because all Members' Customer 
orders in Penny Program and Non-Penny classes routed to MERC and MEMX 
will automatically yield fee codes RQ or RR, respectively, and 
uniformly be assessed the corresponding fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See supra note 9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not 
believe the proposed Market Maker Penny Add Volume Tier will impose any 
burden on intramarket competition. Particularly, the proposed change 
applies uniformly to all Market Makers. As discussed above, to the 
extent a Member participates on the Exchange but not on BZX Equities, 
the Exchange notes that the proposed change can provide an overall 
benefit to the Exchange resulting from the success of BZX Equities. 
Such success enables the Exchange to continue to provide and 
potentially expand its existing incentive programs to the benefit of 
all participants on the Exchange, whether they participate on BZX 
Equities or not. The proposed pricing program is also fair and 
equitable in that membership in BZX Equities is available to all market 
participants. Additionally, the proposed change is designed to attract 
additional order flow to the Exchange and BZX Equities. Greater 
liquidity benefits all market participants on the Exchange by providing 
more trading opportunities and encourages Members to send orders, 
thereby contributing to robust levels of liquidity, which benefits all 
market participant. As a result, the Exchange believes that the 
proposed change furthers the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation 
NMS of fostering competition among orders, which promotes ``more 
efficient pricing of individual stocks for all types of orders, large 
and small.'' \20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808, 70 FR 37495, 
37498-99 (June 29, 2005) (S7-10-04) (Final Rule).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, the Exchange does not believe the proposed rule 
change to amend fee codes RP, RQ, and RR will impose any burden on 
intramarket competition. All Members' Customer orders routing to MERC 
and currently yielding fee code RP will yield fee code RQ or RR 
(depending on whether the order is in Penny Program or Non-Penny 
classes, respectively) and will automatically and uniformly be assessed 
the current fees already in place for such routed orders, as 
applicable. Likewise, all Members' Customer orders routed to MEMX will 
automatically yield fee code RQ or RR (depending on whether the order 
is in Penny Program or Non-Penny classes, respectively) and uniformly 
be assessed the corresponding fee. The Exchange notes that other 
options exchange approximate routing costs in a similar manner as the 
Exchange's current approach.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes will 
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As previously 
discussed, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. 
Members have numerous alternative venues that they may participate on 
and direct their order flow, including 15 other options exchanges and 
off-exchange venues. Additionally, the Exchange represents a small 
percentage

[[Page 56685]]

of the overall market. Based on publicly available information, no 
single options exchange has more than 16% of the market share.\22\ 
Therefore, no exchange possesses significant pricing power in the 
execution of option order flow. Indeed, participants can readily choose 
to send their orders to other exchange and off-exchange venues if they 
deem fee levels at those other venues to be more favorable. Moreover, 
the Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition 
over regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and 
services in the securities markets. Specifically, in Regulation NMS, 
the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in 
determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current 
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in 
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most 
important to investors and listed companies.'' \23\ The fact that this 
market is competitive has also long been recognized by the courts. In 
NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit 
stated as follows: ``[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow 
is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market 
system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that 
act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of 
where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to 
take its market share percentages for granted' because `no exchange 
possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of 
order flow from broker dealers'. . . .''.\24\ Accordingly, the Exchange 
does not believe its proposed fee change imposes any burden on 
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See supra note 3.
    \23\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
    \24\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010) 
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2, 
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-
21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \25\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \26\ 
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed 
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or 
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \26\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
file number SR-CboeBZX-2023-056 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeBZX-2023-056. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for 
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not 
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We 
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted 
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All 
submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeBZX-2023-056 and should 
be submitted on or before September 8, 2023.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-17756 Filed 8-17-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P