Document ID: SEC-2021-1513-0001
Agency: sec
Document Type: Notice
Title: Orders: Conditional Substituted Compliance in Connection with Certain Requirements Applicable to Non-U.S. Security-Based Swap Dealers and Major Security-Based Swap Participants Subject to Regulation in the Federal Republic of Germany; Non-U.S. Security-Based Swap Entities Subject to Regulation in the French Republic or the United Kingdom
Posted Date: 2021-10-28T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 206 (Thursday, October 28, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59797-59824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-23445]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-93411; File No. S7-08-21]

Amended and Restated Order Granting Conditional Substituted 
Compliance in Connection With Certain Requirements Applicable to Non-
U.S. Security-Based Swap Dealers and Major Security-Based Swap 
Participants Subject to Regulation in the Federal Republic of Germany; 
Amended Orders Addressing Non-U.S. Security-Based Swap Entities Subject 
to Regulation in the French Republic or the United Kingdom; and Order 
Extending the Time To Meet Certain Conditions Relating to Capital and 
Margin

October 22, 2021.

I. Overview

A. Amended and Restated Order

    Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'') rule 
3a71-6, in December 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') issued a substituted compliance order \1\ providing 
that security-based swap dealers and major security-based swap 
participants (``SBS Entities'') subject to regulation in the Federal 
Republic of Germany (``Germany'') conditionally may satisfy certain 
requirements under the Exchange Act related to risk control, internal 
supervision and compliance, counterparty protection, and books and 
records by complying with comparable German and European Union (``EU'') 
requirements.\2\ The German Order did not address substituted 
compliance for Exchange Act capital and margin requirements applicable 
to SBS Entities without a prudential regulator.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Exchange Act Release No. 90765 (Dec. 22, 2020), 85 FR 
85686 (Dec. 29, 2020) (``German Order'').
    \2\ ``Risk control'' includes requirements related to internal 
risk management, trade acknowledgment and verification, portfolio 
reconciliation and dispute resolution, portfolio compression and 
trading relationship documentation; ``internal supervision and 
compliance'' includes requirements related to diligent supervision, 
conflicts of interest, information gathering under Exchange Act 
section 15F(j), 15 U.S.C. 78o-10(j), and chief compliance officers; 
``counterparty protection'' includes requirements related to 
disclosure of material risks and characteristics and material 
incentives or conflicts of interest, ``know your counterparty,'' 
suitability of recommendations, fair and balanced communications, 
disclosure of daily marks and disclosure of clearing rights; and 
``books and records'' includes requirements related to making and 
keeping current certain prescribed records, preservation of records, 
reporting, notification and securities counts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In August 2021, the Bundesanstalt f[uuml]r 
Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (``BaFin'') submitted an amended 
``substituted compliance'' application (``Amended Application'') 
requesting that the Commission amend the existing German Order \3\ to 
address nonbank capital and margin requirements.\4\ The Amended 
Application incorporated comparability analyses between the relevant 
requirements in Exchange Act section 15F and the rules and regulations 
thereunder for which BaFin is seeking substituted compliance 
determinations and applicable German and EU law, as well as information 
regarding German supervisory and enforcement frameworks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Letter from Thorsten P[ouml]tzsch, Chief Executive 
Director of BaFin's Resolution Sector, BaFin, to Vanessa Countryman, 
Secretary, Commission, dated August 12, 2021. The Amended 
Application is available on the Commission's website at: https://www.sec.gov/page/exchange-act-substituted-compliance-and-listed-jurisdiction-applications-security-based-swap.
    \4\ ``Capital and margin'' includes requirements related to 
capital applicable to non-prudentially regulated security-based swap 
dealers and to margin applicable to non-prudentially regulated SBS 
Entities. More specifically, the Amended Application requested that 
the Commission extend the German Order to also provide for 
substituted compliance for the capital requirements of Exchange Act 
section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-1 through 18a-1d 
(collectively, ``Exchange Act Rule 18a-1''), the margin requirements 
of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rule 18a-3, and 
related recordkeeping, reporting, notification, and securities count 
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On August 12, 2021, the Commission issued a notice of the Amended 
Application, accompanied by a proposed amended and restated substituted 
compliance order (the ``proposed Amended Order'').\5\ In addition to 
addressing margin and capital requirements, the proposed Amended Order 
proposed changes the Commission preliminarily viewed as necessary to 
align the German Order with substituted compliance orders for SBS 
Entities subject to regulation in the French Republic (``France'') \6\ 
and the United Kingdom (``UK'') \7\ which the

[[Page 59798]]

Commission finalized after issuing the German Order.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Exchange Act Release No. 92647 (Aug. 12, 2021), 86 FR 
46500 (Aug. 18, 2021) (``German Substituted Compliance Notice and 
Proposed Amended Order'').
    \6\ See Exchange Act Release No. 92484 (July 23, 2021), 86 FR 
41612 (Aug. 2, 2021) (``French Order''). See also Exchange Act 
Release No. 90766 (Dec. 22, 2020), 85 FR 85720 (Dec. 29, 2020) 
(``French Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed Order''); 
Exchange Act Release No. 91477 (Apr. 5, 2021), 86 FR 18341 (Apr. 8, 
2021) (``French Reopening Release'').
    \7\ See Exchange Act Release No. 92529 (July 30, 2021), 86 FR 
43318 (Aug. 6, 2021) (``UK Order''). See also Exchange Act Release 
No. 91476 (Apr. 5, 2021), 86 FR 18378 (Apr. 8, 2021) (``UK 
Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed Order'').
    \8\ In addition, the Commission had the benefit of the public 
comment on the French Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Order, the French Reopening Release and the UK Substituted 
Compliance Notice and Proposed Order, some of which also referenced 
the German Order. See German Substituted Compliance Notice and 
Proposed Amended Order, 86 FR 46500 n.6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed below, the Commission is adopting an Amended Order 
that has been modified from the proposal in certain respects to address 
commenter concerns and to make clarifying changes.

B. Amendments to French and UK Orders

    The French and UK Orders include an additional capital condition 
that is designed to ensure comparable regulatory outcomes between 
Exchange Act capital requirements and French and UK capital 
requirements, respectively.\9\ The Commission proposed an identical 
additional capital condition with respect to non-U.S. security-based 
swap dealers subject to regulation in Germany applying substituted 
compliance with respect to Exchange Act capital requirements.\10\ As 
discussed in part V, the Commission is modifying this additional 
capital condition in the Amended Order. These modifications respond to 
comments that were also directed to the capital conditions in the 
French and UK Orders.\11\ The Commission is now issuing an order to 
amend the French and UK Orders to make the additional capital 
conditions in those orders consistent with the additional capital 
condition in the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See French Order, 86 FR 41630-36, 41659; UK Order, 86 FR 
43338-44, 43372.
    \10\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46505-09, 46528-29.
    \11\ See Letter from Kyle Brandon, Managing Director, Head of 
Derivatives Policy, SIFMA (Sept. 13, 2021) (``SIFMA II Letter'') at 
2. Comments may be found on the Commission's website at: http://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-08-21/s70821.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, in response to one commenter's concern regarding 
general condition (a)(5) as discussed in parts II.B and IV below,\12\ 
which is relevant to French and UK Orders as well, the Commission is 
amending the French and UK Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See SIFMA II Letter at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Order Extending Time To Meet Certain Capital Conditions

    In addition, as discussed in part V, the Commission is extending 
until January 1, 2022 the time to meet certain additional conditions to 
applying substituted compliance to Exchange Act capital and margin 
requirements in the Amended Order, the French Order, and the UK Order. 
The Commission also is extending the compliance date for Exchange Act 
capital requirements for a certain type of security-based swap dealer 
located in Germany.

II. Substituted Compliance Framework, Scope of Substituted Compliance, 
and Prerequisites

A. Substituted Compliance Framework and Purpose

    As the Commission discussed when it finalized the German Order,\13\ 
Exchange Act rule 3a71-6 provides a framework whereby non-U.S. SBS 
Entities may satisfy certain requirements under Exchange Act section 
15F by complying with comparable regulatory requirements of a foreign 
jurisdiction.\14\ Because substituted compliance does not constitute 
exemptive relief, but instead provides an alternative method by which 
non-U.S. SBS Entities may comply with applicable Exchange Act 
requirements, the non-U.S. SBS Entities would remain subject to the 
relevant requirements under section 15F. The Commission accordingly 
will retain the authority to inspect, examine and supervise those SBS 
Entities' compliance and take enforcement action as appropriate. Under 
the substituted compliance framework, failure to comply with the 
applicable foreign requirements and other conditions to a substituted 
compliance order would lead to a violation of the applicable 
requirements under the Exchange Act and potential enforcement action by 
the Commission (as opposed to automatic revocation of the substituted 
compliance order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See German Order, 85 FR 85687. See also, e.g., French 
Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed Order, 85 FR 85721.
    \14\ See Exchange Act Release No. 77617 (Apr. 14, 2016), 81 FR 
29960, 30079 (May 13, 2016) (``Business Conduct Adopting Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under rule 3a71-6, substituted compliance potentially is available 
in connection with certain section 15F requirements,\15\ but is not 
available in connection with antifraud prohibitions and certain other 
requirements under the Federal securities laws.\16\ As stated in the 
German Order, SBS Entities in Germany accordingly must comply directly 
with those requirements notwithstanding the availability of substituted 
compliance for other requirements.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 240.3a71-6(d).
    \16\ Exchange Act Release No. 90378 (Nov. 9, 2020), 85 FR 72726, 
72727 nn.11 & 12 (Nov. 13, 2020)(``German Substituted Compliance 
Notice and Proposed Order'')(addressing unavailability of 
substituted compliance in connection with antifraud provisions, as 
well as provisions related to transactions with counterparties that 
are not eligible contract participants (``ECPs''), segregation of 
customer assets, required clearing upon counterparty election, 
regulatory reporting and public dissemination, and registration of 
offerings).
    \17\ See German Order, 85 FR 85687.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The substituted compliance framework reflects the cross-border 
nature of the security-based swap market, and is intended to promote 
efficiency and competition by helping to address potential duplication 
and inconsistency between relevant U.S. and foreign requirements.\18\ 
In practice, substituted compliance may be expected to help SBS 
Entities leverage their existing systems and practices to comply with 
relevant Exchange Act requirements in conjunction with their compliance 
with relevant foreign requirements. Market participants began to count 
security-based swap transactions toward the thresholds for registration 
with the Commission as an SBS Entity on August 6, 2021, and the first 
security-based swap dealers and major security-based swap participants 
are required to be registered with the Commission by November 1, 2021 
and December 1, 2021, respectively.\19\ Substituted compliance should 
assist relevant non-U.S. security-based swap market participants in 
preparing for registration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See generally Business Conduct Adopting Release, 81 FR 
30073 (noting that the cross-border nature of the security-based 
swap market poses special regulatory challenges, in that relevant 
U.S. requirements ``have the potential to lead to requirements that 
are duplicative of or in conflict with applicable foreign business 
conduct requirements, even when the two sets of requirements 
implement similar goals and lead to similar results'').
    \19\ See ``Key Dates for Registration of Security-Based Swap 
Dealers and Major Security-Based Swap Participants,'' available at 
https://www.sec.gov/page/key-dates-registration-security-based-swap-dealers-and-major-security-based-swap-participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Scope of Substituted Compliance

    BaFin, in both its initial application and its Amended Application, 
sought substituted compliance for SBS Entities subject to regulation in 
Germany for entity-level and transaction-level Exchange Act 
requirements. For entity-level Exchange Act requirements,\20\ a

[[Page 59799]]

Covered Entity (as such term in defined in the Amended Order) \21\ must 
choose either to apply substituted compliance pursuant to the proposed 
Amended Order with respect to all security-based swap business subject 
to the relevant German and EU requirements or to comply directly with 
the Exchange Act with respect to all such business; a Covered Entity 
may not choose to apply substituted compliance for some of the business 
subject to the relevant German or EU requirements and comply directly 
with the Exchange Act for another part of the business that is subject 
to the relevant German and EU requirements. Additionally, for entity-
level Exchange Act requirements, if the Covered Entity also has 
security-based swap business that is not subject to the relevant German 
requirements, the Covered Entity must either comply directly with the 
Exchange Act for that business or comply with the terms of another 
applicable substituted compliance order.\22\ For transaction-level 
Exchange Act requirements,\23\ a Covered Entity may decide to apply 
substituted compliance for some of its security-based swap business and 
to comply directly with the Exchange Act (or comply with another 
applicable substituted compliance order) for other parts of its 
security-based swap business.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ The entity-level requirements relate to capital and margin, 
books and records (other than those linked to the counterparty 
protection rules), internal risk management systems, trade 
acknowledgement and verification, portfolio reconciliation, 
compression, trading relationship documentation, and internal 
supervision and chief compliance officer requirements. See Exchange 
Act Release No. 86175 (June 21, 2019) 84 FR 43872, 43879 (Aug 22, 
2019) (``Capital and Margin Adopting Release''); Exchange Act 
Release No. 87005 (June 19, 2019) 84 FR 68550, 68596 (Dec. 16, 2019) 
(``Books and Records Adopting Release''); Exchange Act Release No. 
78011 (June 8, 2016) 81 FR 39808, 39827 (June 17, 2016) (``TAV 
Adopting Release''); Exchange Act Adopting Release No. 87782 (Dec. 
18, 2019) 85 FR 6359, 6378 (Feb. 4, 2020) (``Risk Mitigation 
Adopting Release''); Business Conduct Adopting Release, 81 FR 30064.
    \21\ See para. (g)(1)(iii) of the Amended Order.
    \22\ In the context of the EMIR counterparties condition in 
paragraph (a)(5) of the proposed Amended Order, a Covered Entity 
would have to choose: (1) To apply substituted compliance pursuant 
to the proposed Amended Order--including compliance with paragraph 
(a)(5) as applicable--for a particular set of entity-level 
requirements with respect to all of its business that would be 
subject to the relevant EMIR-based requirement if the counterparty 
were the relevant type of counterparty; or (2) to comply directly 
with the Exchange Act with respect to such business.
    \23\ Transaction-level requirements encompass business conduct 
requirements for the protection of counterparties, and additional 
provisions for the protection of special entities. See Business 
Conduct Adopting Release, 81 FR 30065.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    One commenter requested that the Commission make an exception to 
its approach to substituted compliance for entity-level requirements 
when a Covered Entity enters into a security-based swap with a 
counterparty that is not subject to EMIR.\24\ The commenter asked that 
the Commission permit the Covered Entity, in those circumstances, to 
choose either to apply the relevant EMIR-related requirements to that 
counterparty as though it were covered by EMIR or to comply directly 
with the relevant Exchange Act requirement. In effect, the commenter 
asked that Covered Entities be permitted to treat entity-level 
requirements as transaction-level requirements when the Covered Entity 
enters into a security-based swap with a counterparty that is not 
subject to EMIR. The commenter made a related request with respect to 
counterparties not subject to EMIR, which the Commission addresses in 
part IV.B below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ See SIFMA II Letter at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Amended Order requires a Covered Entity to be subject to and 
comply with EMIR-related requirements if it applies substituted 
compliance for Exchange Act entity-level requirements related to 
internal risk management, trade acknowledgment and verification, 
portfolio reconciliation and dispute resolution, portfolio compression, 
trading relationship documentation, internal supervision, chief 
compliance officers, recordkeeping, and securities count requirements. 
When the Commission adopted these requirements, it determined that SBS 
Entities should apply them at an entity level.\25\ The Commission 
believes that allowing non-U.S. SBS Entities to follow a different 
approach to these entity-level requirements for purposes of the Amended 
Order would undermine its decision to require all SBS Entities to apply 
these requirements at an entity level and create unwarranted 
disparities in the requirements applicable to SBS Entities. In choosing 
to use substituted compliance for an Exchange Act entity-level 
requirement, the Covered Entity is choosing to comply with the relevant 
conditions of the Amended Order. Any Covered Entity that wishes to 
avoid complying with the relevant conditions of the Amended Order, such 
as applying EMIR-related requirements to all of its business that 
satisfies all conditions of the Amended Order, may do so by choosing 
not to use substituted compliance for the relevant entity-level 
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See note 20, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For these reasons, and for the reasons discussed in part IV.B 
below, the Commission is not making an exception to its approach to 
substituted compliance for entity-level requirements when a Covered 
Entity enters into a security-based swap with a counterparty that is 
not subject to EMIR. Commenters did not address the proposed approach 
to substituted compliance for transaction-level requirements. The 
Commission accordingly is issuing the Amended Order with the proposed 
approach to entity-level and transaction-level requirements.

C. Specific Prerequisites

1. Covered Entity
    Under the German Order, the definition of ``Covered Entity'' 
specified which entities could make use of substituted compliance.\26\ 
In connection with its Amended Application related to capital and 
margin requirements, BaFin requested substituted compliance with 
respect to investment firms and credit institutions that are authorized 
by BaFin to provide investment services or perform investment 
activities in Germany and are supervised by the European Central Bank 
(``ECB'') as significant institutions (or had a licensing application 
pending as of August 12, 2021).\27\ In order to ensure that the firms 
that would rely on the proposed Amended Order are subject to the 
relevant German and EU requirements and oversight, the proposed 
definition was revised in accordance with BaFin's request.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ The German Order defined a ``Covered Entity'' as an entity 
that (i) is an SBS Entity registered with the Commission; (ii) is 
not a ``U.S. person,'' as that term is defined in Exchange Act rule 
3a71-3(a)(4); and (iii) is an investment firm or credit institution 
authorized by BaFin to provide investment services or perform 
investment activities in Germany. See para. (f)(1) of the German 
Order, 85 FR 85700.
    \27\ See Amended Application at 1. The Amended Application 
requested that firms that had a licensing application pending with 
the ECB as of the date of the Amended Application be included within 
the definition of Covered Entity.
    \28\ See para. (g)(1)(iii) of the proposed Amended Order; see 
also German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed Amended 
Order, 86 FR 46533.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commenters did not address the amended ``Covered Entity'' 
definition, and the Commission is issuing the definition as 
proposed.\29\ Substituted compliance accordingly is available only to 
Covered Entities that are subject to the relevant German and EU 
regulatory requirements and oversight.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ See para. (g)(1)(iii) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Comparability of Regulatory Outcomes
    As discussed in the German Order and earlier in the German 
Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed Order,\30\ Rule 3a71-6 
describes the requirements for the Commission to make a substituted 
compliance determination. Under the rule, the Commission must determine 
that the analogous foreign requirements are comparable to otherwise 
applicable requirements under the Exchange Act (i.e., the relevant 
requirements in the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations 
thereunder), after accounting for factors such as ``the

[[Page 59800]]

scope and objectives of the relevant foreign regulatory requirements'' 
and ``the effectiveness of the supervisory compliance program 
administered, and the enforcement authority exercised'' by the foreign 
authority.\31\ As noted upon adoption of the German Order and 
subsequent substituted compliance orders, the comparability assessments 
are to be based on a ``holistic approach'' that ``will focus on the 
comparability of regulatory outcomes rather than predicating 
substituted compliance on requirement-by-requirement similarity.'' \32\ 
The Commission has concluded that this comparability prerequisite is 
met in connection with a number of requirements under the Exchange Act, 
in some cases with the addition of conditions to help ensure the 
comparability of regulatory outcomes.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ See German Order, 85 FR 85687; German Substituted 
Compliance Notice and Proposed Order, 85 FR 72727.
    \31\ Exchange Act rule 3a71-6(a)(2)(i).
    \32\ See German Order; 85 FR 85687; French Order, 86 FR 41613; 
UK Order, 86 FR 43319. See also Business Conduct Adopting Release, 
81 FR 30078-79 (further recognizing that ``different regulatory 
systems may be able to achieve some or all of those regulatory 
outcomes by using more or fewer specific requirements than the 
Commission, and that in assessing comparability the Commission may 
need to take into account the manner in which other regulatory 
systems are informed by business and market practices in those 
jurisdictions''). The Commission's assessment of a foreign 
authority's supervisory and enforcement effectiveness--as part of 
the broader comparability analysis--would be expected to consider 
not only overall oversight activities, but also oversight 
specifically directed at conduct and activity relevant to the 
substituted compliance determination. ``For example, it would be 
difficult for the Commission to make a comparability determination 
in support of substituted compliance if oversight is directed solely 
at the local activities of foreign security-based swap dealers, as 
opposed to the cross-border activities of such dealers.'' Business 
Conduct Adopting Release, 81 FR 30079 (footnote omitted).
    \33\ See German Order, 85 FR 85687.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Memoranda of Understanding
    Exchange Act rule 3a71-6(a)(2)(ii) further predicates the 
availability of substituted compliance on the Commission and the 
foreign financial regulatory authority or authorities entering into a 
supervisory and enforcement memorandum of understanding and/or other 
arrangement with the relevant foreign financial regulatory authorities 
``addressing supervisory and enforcement cooperation and other matters 
arising under the substituted compliance determination.'' \34\ With the 
proposed expansion of substituted compliance to nonbank capital and 
margin requirements, BaFin and the ECB share responsibility for 
supervising compliance with the provisions of EU and German law 
applicable to the Amended Order. Accordingly, the Commission entered 
into relevant memoranda of understanding with BaFin on December 20, 
2020 \35\ and with the ECB on August 16, 2021.\36\ Both memoranda of 
understanding must be in place before Covered Entities may use 
substituted compliance to satisfy obligations under the Exchange 
Act.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ Exchange Act rule 3a71-6(a)(2)(ii).
    \35\ On December 18, 2020, the Commission and BaFin entered into 
a memorandum of understanding to address substituted compliance 
cooperation, a copy of which is on the Commission's website at 
www.sec.gov under the ``Substituted Compliance'' tab, which is 
located on the ``Security-Based Swap Markets'' page in the Division 
of Trading and Markets section of the site.
    \36\ On August 16, 2021, the Commission and the ECB entered into 
a memorandum of understanding setting forth the conditions under 
which supervisory and enforcement information for certain subject 
matters, including but not limited to margin and capital, that is 
owned by the ECB, can be requested, shared, used and protected from 
unauthorized disclosure by the SEC and ECB. The memorandum of 
understanding serves as a framework for consultation, cooperation 
and the exchange of information between the SEC and the ECB in the 
supervision, enforcement and oversight of the covered firms. A copy 
of the memorandum of understanding is available on the Commission's 
website at www.sec.gov under the ``Substituted Compliance'' tab, 
which is located on the ``Security-Based Swap Markets'' page in the 
Division of Trading and Markets section of the site.
    \37\ See paras. (a)(7) and (8) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. ``Adequate assurances''
    A foreign financial regulatory authority may submit a substituted 
compliance application only if the authority provides ``adequate 
assurances'' that no law or policy would impede the ability of any 
entity that is directly supervised by the authority and that may 
register with the Commission ``to provide prompt access to the 
Commission to such entity's books and records or to submit to onsite 
inspection or examination by the Commission.'' \38\ The Commission 
found that BaFin had satisfied this requirement in connection with the 
German Order when noticing the application.\39\ In addition, in 
proposing the Amended Order, the Commission stated that BaFin had again 
satisfied this prerequisite in the Commission's preliminary view, 
taking into account information and representations that BaFin provided 
regarding certain German and EU requirements that are relevant to the 
Commission's ability to inspect, and access the books and records of, 
firms using substituted compliance pursuant to the Order.\40\ The 
Commission received no comments on this preliminary view and has not 
changed its view.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ See Exchange Act rule 3a71-6(c)(3).
    \39\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Order, 85 FR 72728. In adopting the German Order, the Commission 
reiterated its view with regard to adequate assurances. See German 
Order, 85 FR 85696.
    \40\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46522. See also Amended Application at 2 
(providing ``adequate assurances'' regarding access to books and 
records and on-site inspections and examinations).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Amended and Additional General Conditions

    The original German Order incorporated a number of general 
conditions and other prerequisites to help ensure that the relevant 
German and EU requirements that form the basis for substituted 
compliance in practice will apply to the Covered Entity's security-
based swap business and activities, and to promote the Commission's 
oversight over entities that avail themselves of substituted 
compliance.\41\ In the German Substituted Compliance Notice and 
Proposed Amended Order, the Commission proposed to amend certain of the 
general conditions and prerequisites and to include additional new 
conditions. The proposed Amended Order would address BaFin's request to 
extend the German Order to provide substituted compliance for nonbank 
capital and margin requirements and also provide clarity and 
consistency with the French Order and the UK Order as described more 
fully in this part III below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \41\ See paras. (a)(1) through (7) of the German Order, 85 FR 
85698.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Revision of General Condition Regarding Notice

1. Proposed Approach
    The German Order included a general condition that Covered Entities 
must provide the Commission with written notice of their intent to rely 
on substituted compliance.\42\ To promote clarity in the notice 
regarding the Covered Entity's intended use of substituted compliance 
and for consistency with the Commission's other substituted compliance 
orders,\43\ the Commission proposed to amend the general condition to 
require that the notice identify each specific substituted compliance 
determination for which the Covered Entity intends to apply substituted 
compliance. The proposed Amended Order also would require the Covered 
Entity to amend the notice if it modifies the scope of its reliance on 
substituted compliance and to send the notice to the Commission in the 
manner

[[Page 59801]]

specified on the Commission's website.\44\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \42\ See para. (a)(6) of the German Order.
    \43\ See French Order, 86 FR 41685; UK Order, 86 FR 43371. See 
also German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed Amended 
Order, 86 FR 46501 n.13.
    \44\ See para. (a)(9) of the proposed Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Commenter Views and Final Provisions
    Commenters did not address the revision to the notice requirement 
in paragraph (a)(9) of the proposed Amended Order for the Covered 
Entity to notify the Commission in writing of its intent to rely on 
substituted compliance and the Commission is issuing this requirement 
as proposed.\45\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \45\ See para. (a)(9) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Additional Condition Regarding Notification of Requirements Related 
to Changes in Capital

1. Proposed Approach
    The Commission proposed to add a general condition that Covered 
Entities with a prudential regulator relying on substituted compliance 
pursuant to the proposed Amended Order must apply substituted 
compliance with respect to the requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-
8(c) and the requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-8(h) as applied to 
Exchange Act rule 18a-8(c).\46\ Exchange Act rule 18a-8(c) generally 
requires every security-based swap dealer with a prudential regulator 
that files a notice of adjustment of its reported capital category with 
the Federal Reserve Board, the Office of the Comptroller of the 
Currency, or the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to give notice 
of this fact on same day by transmitting a copy to the Commission of 
the notice of adjustment of reported capital category in accordance 
with Exchange Act rule 18a-8(h).\47\ Exchange Act rule 18a-8(h) sets 
forth the manner in which every notice or report required to be given 
or transmitted pursuant to Exchange Act rule 18a-8 must be made.\48\ 
While Exchange Act rule 18a-8(c) is not linked to an Exchange Act 
capital requirement, it is linked to capital requirements in the U.S. 
promulgated by the prudential regulators. In its application, BaFin 
cited several German and EU provisions as providing similar outcomes to 
the notifications requirements of Exchange Act Rule 18a-8.\49\ This 
proposed general condition was designed to clarify that a prudentially 
regulated Covered Entity must provide the Commission with copies of any 
notifications regarding changes in the Covered Entity's capital 
situation required by German or EU law. The intent was to align the 
notification requirement with the German and EU capital requirements 
applicable to the Covered Entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \46\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46502; para. (a)(11) of the proposed Amended 
Order.
    \47\ 17 CFR 240.18a-8(c).
    \48\ See 240.18a-8(h).
    \49\ See KWG section 25a(1) sentence 6 no. 3, and FinDAG section 
4d.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Commenter Views and Final Provisions
    The Commission did not receive any comments on this proposed 
amendment to the German Order and the Amended Order includes this 
provision.\50\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \50\ See para. (a)(11) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Amendment to General Condition Regarding EU Cross-Border Matters

1. Proposed Approach
    The Commission proposed to modify the German Order's general 
condition related to EU cross-border matters. Substituted compliance 
under the German Order in part is predicated on BaFin being responsible 
for the supervision and enforcement of Covered Entities in connection 
with certain MiFID provisions that constitute conditions to individual 
substituted compliance provisions.\51\ That general condition is 
intended to help ensure that the prerequisites to substituted 
compliance with respect to supervision and enforcement are satisfied in 
practice when MiFID allocates responsibility for ensuring compliance to 
another EU Member State. Because MiFIR is subject to similar allocation 
provisions,\52\ the Commission proposed to incorporate references to 
MiFIR requirements into the general condition.\53\ This change would be 
consistent with the French Order.\54\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \51\ See part IX, infra.
    \52\ See MiFID art. 35(8) (in part allocating responsibility 
over MiFIR articles 14 to 26 to competent authorities in member 
states in which branches are located).
    \53\ See para. (a)(10) of the proposed Amended Order.
    \54\ See para. (a)(10) of the French Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Commenter Views and Final Provisions
    The Commission did not receive any comments on this proposed 
revision to the German Order's general condition related to EU cross-
border matters and is issuing the revision as proposed.\55\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \55\ See para. (a)(10) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

D. Additional MOU-Related General Condition

1. Proposed Approach
    In light of the Amended Application addressing capital and margin 
requirements for nonbanks, the Commission also proposed to add a new 
general condition that would predicate substituted compliance on the 
presence of a supervisory and enforcement memorandum of understanding 
between the Commission and the ECB, pertaining to information owned by 
the ECB.\56\ The Commission stated its preliminary view that access to 
this ECB information will assist the Commission's effective oversight 
of Covered Entities that use substituted compliance in connection with 
capital and margin requirements. The Commission and the ECB entered 
into a MOU addressing supervisory and enforcement cooperation related 
to substituted compliance on August 16, 2021.\57\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \56\ See para. (a)(8) of the proposed Amended Order.
    \57\ See note 36, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Commenter Views and Final Provisions
    The Commission did not receive any comments on this new proposed 
general condition to the German Order requiring a supervisory and 
enforcement memorandum of understanding between the Commission and the 
ECB and is issuing the condition as proposed.\58\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \58\ See para. (a)(8) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Changes to Risk Control and Internal Supervision Requirements

A. Changes to Trade Acknowledgement and Verification and Trading 
Relationship Documentation

1. Proposed Approach
    Under the original German Order, substituted compliance for trade 
acknowledgement and verification and for trading relationship 
documentation in part requires that a Covered Entity comply with 
certain requirements under MiFID (plus the German implementation of 
MiFID) and with certain requirements under EMIR.\59\ Commenters to the 
French Order expressed concern that the interplay between those 
particular MiFID conditions and a separate EU cross-border condition to 
the Order in practice would preclude the availability of substituted 
compliance for entities that have branches in other EU Member 
States.\60\ After careful consideration and

[[Page 59802]]

finalization of the French Order, the Commission proposed to amend the 
German Order to address those concerns and for consistency with the 
French Order. The proposed Amended Order revised the conditions related 
to trade acknowledgment and verification requirements, and to trading 
relationship documentation, by removing the MiFID-related conditions 
and instead relying solely on EMIR conditions to establish 
comparability for those requirements.\61\ The Commission believes that 
the Amended Order's EU cross-border condition provides an important 
safeguard to help ensure that firms that avail themselves of 
substituted compliance are subject to appropriate regulatory 
supervision and enforcement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \59\ See paras. (b)(2) and (5) of the German Order.
    \60\ See Letter from Kyle Brandon, Managing Director, Head of 
Derivatives Policy, SIFMA (Jan. 25, 2021)(``SIFMA Letter I'') 
(commenting on the French Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Order but stating that the concerns applied equally to the German 
Order). SIFMA Letter I can be found on the Commission's website at: 
http://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-22-20/s72220.htm. In relevant part, 
the cross-border condition of paragraph (a)(10) of the proposed 
Amended Order stated that if responsibility for ensuring compliance 
with any provision of MiFID or MiFIR (or the EU or German 
implementing requirement) that is a condition for substituted 
compliance is allocated to an authority in a Member State of the EU 
in whose territory a Covered Entity provides a service, BaFin must 
be the authority responsible for supervision and enforcement of that 
provision. In practice (pursuant to MiFID article 35), this 
allocation of oversight applies to requirements pursuant to MiFID 
article 25 (``assessment of suitability and appropriateness and 
reporting to clients'') as well as certain other MiFID provisions 
not relevant here. In the commenter's view, application of those 
MiFID article 25 conditions in connection with trade acknowledgment 
and verification requirements and trading relationship documentation 
requirements would ``in practice lead to an untenable patchwork of 
substituted compliance.'' See SIFMA Letter I at 3. The commenter 
further states that SBS Entities ``operating branches throughout the 
EU'' would not be able to avail themselves of substituted compliance 
in connection with these requirements ``unless authorities or 
regulated SBS Entities in every or nearly every one of the 27 EU 
Member States submit their own substituted compliance applications 
covering local branches of SBS Entities, and the Commission reviews 
and responds to those applications and enters into memoranda of 
understanding . . . with authorities in each of these Member 
States.'' That problem does not arise in connection with 
requirements under EMIR, which does not allocate oversight of a 
German entity's compliance to authorities in other EU Member States. 
That problem also does not arise in connection with other 
requirements under MiFID (e.g., MiFID art. 16 organizational 
provisions) that are not subject to the same allocation of 
oversight.
    \61\ See paras. (b)(2) and (5) of the proposed Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with French Order,\62\ the proposed Amended Order 
removed the MiFID conditions to substituted compliance for trade 
acknowledgement and verification and trade relationship 
documentation.\63\ In addition, the Commission proposed to add the 
confirmation provisions of EMIR article 11(1)(a) and EMIR RTS article 
12 as conditions to substituted compliance for trade relationship 
documentation.\64\ The Commission preliminarily believed that the EMIR 
provisions related condition described below, were sufficient for 
regulatory comparability and recognized that in practice the interplay 
between the EU cross-border conditions and MiFID documentation 
provisions may limit the use of substituted compliance and its 
associated regulatory benefits.\65\ To ensure that there would be no 
opportunity for gaps that may prevent the EMIR provisions in practice 
from producing outcomes consistent with those of the Exchange Act 
rules, that preliminary view, however, required the addition of the 
EMIR-related conditions in paragraphs (a)(5) and (a)(6) of the proposed 
Amended Order and described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \62\ See para. (b)(2) of the French Order.
    \63\ See paras. (b)(2) and (5) of the proposed Amended Order.
    \64\ See para. (b)(5) of the proposed Amended Order.
    \65\ In addition, these proposed changes are consistent with the 
French Order. See paras. (a)(5) and (a)(6) of the French Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Commenter's Views and Final Provisions
    The Commission did not receive any comments on the proposed 
revisions to the German Order's conditions related to trade 
acknowledgment and verification requirements, and trading relationship 
documentation, to remove the MiFID-related conditions and rely solely 
on EMIR conditions to establish comparability for those requirements, 
and issues those revisions as proposed and consistent with the French 
Order.\66\ This decision takes into account the discussion below 
related to the EMIR-related general conditions and the comment the 
Commission received on the EMIR-related general condition regarding 
counterparty status.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \66\ See paras. (b)(2) and (b)(5) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Addition of EMIR-Related General Conditions

1. Proposed Approach
    The heightened reliance on the EMIR conditions to establish 
comparability in connection with trade acknowledgment and verification 
and trading relationship documentation requires additional safeguards 
to help ensure that there will be no opportunity for gaps that may 
prevent the EMIR provisions in practice from producing outcomes 
consistent with those of the Exchange Act rules. In response, the 
proposed Amended Order included two additional EMIR-related general 
conditions. The first such condition provides that the Covered Entity 
must comply with the applicable EMIR-related condition of the proposed 
Amended Order as if the counterparty were the type of counterparty that 
would trigger the application of the relevant EMIR-based requirements. 
If the Covered Entity reasonably determines that its counterparty would 
be a financial counterparty \67\ if not for the counterparty's location 
and/or lack of regulatory authorization in the EU, the condition 
further requires the Covered Entity to treat the counterparty as if the 
counterparty were a financial counterparty, rather than as another type 
of counterparty to which the relevant EMIR-based requirements may 
apply.\68\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \67\ EMIR article 2(8) defines ``financial counterparty'' to 
encompass investment firms, credit institutions, insurers and 
certain other types of businesses that have been authorized in 
accordance with EU law. Under EMIR, the distinction between 
financial counterparties and other types of counterparties such as 
non-financial counterparties is manifested, inter alia, in 
connection with confirmation timing standards. See EMIR RTS article 
12.
    \68\ See para. (a)(5) of the proposed Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The second such condition would require that, for each part of the 
Order that requires compliance with EMIR-related requirements, either: 
(i) The relevant security-based swap is an ``OTC derivative'' or ``OTC 
derivative contract,'' as defined in EMIR article 2(7), that has not 
been cleared by a central counterparty and otherwise is subject to the 
provisions of EMIR article 11, EMIR RTS articles 11 through 15, and 
EMIR Margin RTS article 2; or (ii) the relevant security-based swap has 
been cleared by a central counterparty that has been authorized or 
recognized to clear derivatives contracts by a relevant authority in 
the EU.\69\ This second condition would help ensure that substituted 
compliance is available in connection with an instrument that has been 
cleared at an EU-authorized or EU-recognized central counterparty (and 
hence is not within the Exchange Act rule's exclusion but also is not 
subject to relevant EMIR requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \69\ See para. (a)(6) of the proposed Amended Order. Prong (i) 
to this proposed condition would be satisfied by uncleared 
instruments that fall within the ambit of the EMIR requirements at 
issue. The alternative prong (ii) would be satisfied when 
instruments fall outside the ambit of those EMIR requirements by 
virtue of being cleared in the EU, akin to the Exchange Act rules' 
exclusion for security-based swaps cleared by clearing agencies 
registered with the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Commenter's Views and Final Provisions
    One commenter stated that the proposed additional EMIR-related 
condition related to counterparty status effectively would override 
exemptions and exclusions from EMIR for certain public sector 
counterparties, such as multilateral development banks, and would 
expand the application of EMIR to counterparties who are not 
``undertakings,'' such as natural persons.\70\ The commenter noted that

[[Page 59803]]

compliance with the condition would require the Covered Entity to 
``assess whether these counterparties who are not subject to EMIR would 
be so subject as if it were the type of counterparty specified by EMIR 
as well as, in many cases, enter into documentation with those 
counterparties compliant with EMIR.'' \71\ The commenter noted that 
these counterparties would be confused why an order of the Commission 
``now deprives them of an exception or exemption under EU law that has 
for some time applied to them'' and would be reluctant to enter into 
new documentation to enable a Covered Entity to satisfy the 
Commission's substituted compliance order.\72\ To address this 
reluctance, the commenter requested a six-month transition period until 
May 1, 2022, before a Covered Entity will be required to comply with 
the EMIR counterparty general condition in paragraph (a)(5) of the 
Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \70\ See SIFMA II Letter at 2.
    \71\ See SIFMA II Letter at 3.
    \72\ See SIFMA II Letter at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission proposed revisions to the conditions to trade 
acknowledgement and verification and trading relationship documentation 
substituted compliance to remove the MiFID conditions and rely entirely 
on EMIR requirements in response to commenters' concerns that the 
relevant MiFID conditions in the German Order would preclude the 
availability of substituted compliance for entities that have branches 
in EU Member States.\73\ The Commission proposed to amend the German 
Order to address those concerns and for consistency with French Order, 
but only with the addition of the EMIR-related counterparty condition. 
By requiring a Covered Entity to treat its counterparty as a type of 
counterparty that would trigger the application of the relevant EMIR-
based requirements, the condition will require the Covered Entity to 
perform the relevant obligations pursuant to those EMIR-based 
requirements and thus act in a way that is comparable to Exchange Act 
requirements. Absent the condition, the Commission would not find 
comparability with regard to the categories of counterparties, such as 
U.S. persons and natural persons, to which EMIR is not applicable for 
the entity-level requirements and, accordingly, would not have been 
able to make a positive substituted compliance determination for those 
entity-level requirements. The EMIR-related conditions were intended to 
help ensure that there will be no opportunity for gaps that may prevent 
the EMIR provisions in practice from producing outcomes consistent with 
those of the Exchange Act rules.\74\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \73\ See German Substituted Compliance Order and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46503.
    \74\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46503.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission, however, did not intend for the condition to 
require compliance with EMIR under circumstances where neither EMIR nor 
the Exchange Act would apply. As such, the Commission is modifying the 
EMIR counterparties general condition to clarify that this condition 
applies only to the extent that an Exchange Act section or rule cited 
in the relevant part of the Amended Order applies to the security-based 
swap activities with that counterparty.\75\ To promote consistency in 
the use of substituted compliance across other jurisdictions in which 
EMIR applies, the Commission also is modifying the same condition in 
the French Order and the UK Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \75\ See para. (a)(5)(iii) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Although the Commission is not modifying the condition to the 
extent requested by the commenter, the Commission is not providing an 
additional transition period at this time. The registration compliance 
date for U.S. and non-U.S. SBS Entities is October 6, 2021, and that is 
also the compliance date for the entity-level requirements at issue. 
This date has been known to potential SBS Entities since February 4, 
2020.\76\ In areas where the Commission makes a positive substituted 
compliance determination under the Amended Order, Covered Entities will 
have additional flexibility with respect to how to comply with the 
relevant Exchange Act requirements, but they, like all registered SBS 
Entities, must comply with the Exchange Act as of the later of the 
registration compliance date or the date when they register with the 
Commission. Commission staff are available to discuss implementation 
issues with Covered Entities during the implementation period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \76\ See Exchange Act Release No. 87780 (Dec. 18, 2019), 85 FR 
6270, 6345-46 (Feb. 4, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The same commenter asked that the Commission confirm that, when a 
Covered Entity enters into a security-based swap with a counterparty 
that is not subject to EMIR, the Covered Entity may choose either to 
apply the relevant EMIR-related requirements to that counterparty as 
though it were covered by EMIR or to comply directly with the relevant 
Exchange Act requirement.\77\ As discussed in part II.B above, the 
Commission is not providing the requested relief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \77\ See SIFMA II Letter at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission did not receive any comments on the proposed 
addition of the general condition in paragraph (a)(6) of the Amended 
Order related to the security-based swap's status as an ``OTC 
derivative'' or ``OTC derivate contract'' under EMIR. The Commission is 
issuing this additional general condition with a clarification that the 
condition applies only if the relevant EMIR-based requirement applies 
to OTC derivatives that have not been cleared by a central 
counterparty.\78\ The Commission is making this clarification because 
some provisions of EMIR cited in the Amended Order, such as EMIR 
articles 39(4) and (5), are not limited in their application to non-
centrally cleared OTC derivatives. The Commission also is clarifying 
that the condition applies whenever the Amended Order requires the 
application of, and the Covered Entity's compliance with EMIR, EMIR RTS 
EMIR Margin RTS and/or other EU requirements adopted pursuant to those 
provisions. These clarifications already appear in a similar condition 
in the UK Order, and, to promote consistency in the use of substituted 
compliance across other jurisdictions in which EMIR applies, the 
Commission also is modifying the same condition in the French Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \78\ See para. (a)(6) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Revisions to Internal Risk Management and Internal Supervision

1. Proposed Approach
    The Commission also proposed to incorporate--as part of the 
relevant conditions in paragraph (b)(1) of the proposed Amended Order 
relating to internal risk management--MiFID articles 16 and 23 and the 
related implementing provisions, MiFID Org Reg articles 25 through 37, 
72 through 76 and Annex IV, as well as CRD articles 88(1), 91(1)-(2) 
and (7)-(9) and the related implementing provisions.\79\ These 
provisions address additional aspects of a Covered Entity's management 
of the risks posed by internal governance and organization, business 
operations, conflicts of interest with and between clients, and senior 
staff remuneration policies and were part of the Commission's 
comparability determination for entities subject to regulation in 
France. The Commission also proposed to incorporate CRR articles 286-88 
and 293 and EMIR Margin RTS article 2 to the conditions of paragraph 
(d)(3) of the proposed Amended Order relating to internal

[[Page 59804]]

supervision.\80\ These provisions relate to counterparty credit risk 
and risk management generally and collateral-related risk management 
procedures and were also part of the Commission's comparability 
analysis in the French Order.\81\ Also consistent with the French 
Order, the Commission proposed to delete CRD article 93 and the related 
implementing provisions from both paragraph (d)(1) and (d)(3), as those 
provisions relate to remuneration policies for institutions that 
benefit from exceptional (German and EU) government intervention.\82\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \79\ See para. (b)(1) of the proposed Amended Order.
    \80\ See para. (d)(3) of the proposed Amended Order.
    \81\ See paras. (b)(1) and (d)(3) of the French Order.
    \82\ See paras. (b)(1) and (d)(3) of the proposed Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Commenter Views and Final Provisions
    The Commission did not receive any comments on the proposed 
revisions to paragraphs (b)(1) and (d)(3) of the German Order related 
to the inclusion of additional conditions and to paragraphs (d)(1) and 
(d)(3) of the German Order related to the deletion of CRD article 93 
and implementing provisions. The Commission issues these revisions to 
the German Order as proposed.\83\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \83\ See paras. (b)(1), (d)(1) and (d)(3) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Substituted Compliance for Capital and Margin Requirements

A. Proposed Approach

    The Amended Application in part requested substituted compliance in 
connection with requirements under the Exchange Act relating to:
     Capital--Capital requirements pursuant to Exchange Act 
section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rule 18a-1 and 18a-1a through 18a-1d 
applicable to certain SBS Entities.\84\ Exchange Act rule 18a-1 helps 
to ensure the SBS Entity maintains at all times sufficient liquid 
assets to promptly satisfy its liabilities, and to provide a cushion of 
liquid assets in excess of liabilities to cover potential market, 
credit, and other risks.\85\ The rule's net liquid assets test standard 
protects customers and counterparties and mitigates the consequences of 
an SBS Entity's failure by promoting the ability of the firm to absorb 
financial shocks and, if necessary, to self-liquidate in an orderly 
manner.\86\ As part of the capital requirements, security-based swap 
dealers without a prudential regulator also must comply with the 
internal risk management control requirements of Exchange Act Rule 
15c3-4 with respect to certain activities.\87\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \84\ Exchange Act rule 18a-1 applies to security-based swap 
dealers that: (1) Do not have a prudential regulator; and (2) are 
either (a) not dually registered with the Commission as a broker-
dealer or (b) are dually registered with the Commission as a special 
purpose broker-dealer known as an OTC derivatives dealer. Security-
based swap dealers that are dually-registered with the Commission as 
a full-service broker-dealer are subject to the capital requirements 
of Exchange Act rule 15c3-1 (17 CFR 240.15c3-1) for which 
substituted compliance is not available. See 17 CFR 240.3a71-
6(d)(4)(i) (making substituted compliance available only with 
respect to the capital requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) 
and Exchange Act rule 18a-1).
    \85\ See Capital and Margin Adopting Release, 84 FR 43947. The 
Amended Application discusses EU and German requirements that 
address firms' capital requirements. See Amended Application Annex A 
category 3 (Side Letter Addressing Capital Requirements). See also 
Amended Application Annex A category 4 (Internal Risk Management 
Requirements) (generally discussing internal risk management 
requirements).
    \86\ See Capital and Margin Adopting Release, 84 FR 43879-83. 
The capital standard of Exchange Act rule 18a-1 is based on the net 
liquid assets test of Exchange Act rule 15c3-1 applicable to broker-
dealers. Id. The net liquid assets test seeks to promote liquidity 
by requiring that a firm maintain sufficient liquid assets to meet 
all liabilities, including obligations to customers, counterparties, 
and other creditors, and, in the event a firm fails financially, to 
have adequate additional resources to wind-down its business in an 
orderly manner without the need for a formal proceeding. See id. at 
43879. See Amended Application Annex A category 3 (Side Letter 
Addressing Capital Requirements).
    \87\ See 17 CFR 240.15c3-4 and 18a-1(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Margin--Margin requirements pursuant to Exchange Act 
section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rule 18a-3 for non-prudentially 
regulated SBS Entities.\88\ The margin requirements are designed to 
protect SBS Entities from the consequences of a counterparty's 
default.\89\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \88\ 17 CFR 240.18a-3.
    \89\ See Capital and Margin Adopting Release, 84 FR 43947, 43949 
(``Obtaining collateral is one of the ways OTC derivatives dealers 
manage their credit risk exposure to OTC derivatives counterparties. 
Prior to the financial crisis, in certain circumstances, 
counterparties were able to enter into OTC derivatives transactions 
without having to deliver collateral. When `trigger events' occurred 
during the financial crisis, those counterparties faced significant 
liquidity strains when they were required to deliver collateral''). 
The Amended Application discusses EU and German requirements that 
address firms' margin requirements. See Amended Application Annex A 
category 4 (Margin Requirements for Nonbank Firms).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Taken as a whole, these capital and margin requirements help to 
promote market stability by mandating that SBS Entities follow 
practices to manage the market, credit, liquidity, solvency, 
counterparty, and operational risks associated with their security-
based swap businesses.
    In proposing to provide conditional substituted compliance in 
connection with this part of the Amended Application, the Commission 
preliminarily concluded that substituted compliance with respect to the 
Exchange Act capital and margin requirements would be subject to 
certain additional conditions.\90\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \90\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46505-11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Commenter Views and Final Provisions

1. Capital
    Substituted compliance with respect to the capital requirements of 
Exchange Act rule 18a-1 would be conditioned on Covered Entities being 
subject to and complying with relevant EU and German capital 
requirements.\91\ The Commission did not receive comment on this 
proposed capital condition and the Amended Order includes the 
condition.\92\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \91\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46505.
    \92\ See para. (c)(1)(i) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The first additional capital condition required that the Covered 
Entity apply substituted compliance with respect to Exchange Act rules 
18a-5(a)(9) (a record making requirement), 18a-6(b)(1)(x) (a record 
preservation requirement), and 18a-8(a)(1)(i), (a)(1)(ii), (b)(1), 
(b)(2), and (b)(4) (notification requirements relating to capital).\93\ 
These recordkeeping and notification requirements are directly linked 
to the capital requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-1. The proposed 
Amended Order conditioned substituted compliance with respect to these 
recordkeeping and notification requirements on the Covered Entity 
applying substituted compliance with respect to Exchange Act rule 18a-
1.\94\ This additional capital condition in the proposed Amended Order 
did the reverse: It conditioned substituted compliance with respect to 
Exchange Act rule 18a-1 on the Covered Entity applying substituted 
compliance for these linked recordkeeping and notification 
requirements. This proposed additional capital condition was designed 
to provide clarity as to the Covered Entity's obligations under these 
recordkeeping and notification requirements when applying substituted 
compliance with respect to Exchange Act rule 18a-1. The Commission did 
not receive comment on this proposed additional capital condition and 
the Amended Order includes the condition.\95\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \93\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46505.
    \94\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46512-18, 46520-22.
    \95\ See para. (c)(1)(ii) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The second additional capital condition imposed a simplified net 
liquid assets test and related

[[Page 59805]]

requirements on the Covered Entity.\96\ This condition was designed to 
help ensure the comparability of regulatory outcomes between Exchange 
Act rule 18a-1 (which imposes a net liquid assets test) and the capital 
requirements applicable to nonbank security-based swap dealers in 
Germany that are expected to register with the Commission. Those 
capital requirements are based on the international capital standard 
for banks (``Basel capital standard'').\97\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \96\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46505-09.
    \97\ See, e.g., Basel Committee on Banking Supervision 
(``BCBS''), The Basel Framework, available at: https://www.bis.org/basel_framework/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The second additional capital condition had four prongs. In 
particular, it conditioned substituted compliance with respect to 
Exchange Act rule 18a-1 on the Covered Entity: (1) Maintaining liquid 
assets (as defined in the proposed condition) that have an aggregate 
market value that exceeds the amount of the Covered Entity's total 
liabilities by at least $100 million before applying the deduction 
specified in the proposed condition, and by at least $20 million after 
applying the deduction specified in the proposed condition; (2) making 
and preserving for three years a quarterly record with respect to the 
first prong; \98\ (3) notifying the Commission in writing within 24 
hours in the manner specified on the Commission's website if the 
Covered Entity fails to meet the requirements of the proposed condition 
and including in the notice the contact information of an individual 
who could provide further information about the failure to meet the 
requirements; and (4) including its most recent statement of financial 
condition filed with its local supervisor (whether audited or 
unaudited) with its initial written notice to the Commission of its 
intent to rely on substituted compliance.\99\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \98\ In particular, quarterly record would need to: (1) Identify 
and value the liquid assets (as defined in the proposed condition) 
maintained pursuant to the proposed condition; (2) compare the 
amount of the aggregate value the liquid assets maintained pursuant 
to the proposed condition to the amount of the Covered Entity's 
total liabilities and show the amount of the difference between the 
two amounts (``the excess liquid assets amount''), and (3) show the 
amount of the deduction specified in the proposed condition and the 
amount that deduction reduces the excess liquid assets amount. See 
German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed Amended Order, 86 
FR 46509.
    \99\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46507-09.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the purposes of the capital condition, ``liquid assets'' would 
be defined as: (1) Cash and cash equivalents; (2) collateralized 
agreements; (3) customer and other trading related receivables; (4) 
trading and financial assets; and (5) initial margin posted by the 
Covered Entity to a counterparty or third-party that meets certain 
conditions.\100\ These categories of liquid assets were designed to 
align with assets that are considered allowable assets for purposes of 
calculating net capital under Exchange Act rule 18a-1. If an asset did 
not fall within one of the five categories of ``liquid assets'' as 
defined in the proposed Amended Order, it would be considered non-
liquid, and could not be treated as a liquid asset for purposes of this 
capital condition.\101\ For example, the following categories of assets 
generally would not have been able to be treated as liquid assets: (1) 
Investments; (2) loans; and (3) other assets.\102\ The non-liquid 
``investment'' category would have included the Covered Entity's 
ownership interests in subsidiaries or other affiliates. The non-liquid 
``loans'' category would have included unsecured loans and advances. 
The non-liquid ``other'' assets category would have referred to assets 
that do not fall into any of the other categories of liquid or non-
liquid assets. These non-liquid ``other'' assets would have included 
furniture, fixtures, equipment, real estate, property, leasehold 
improvements, deferred tax assets, prepayments, and intangible assets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \100\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46508. The fifth category of liquid assets 
would be initial margin posted by the Covered Entity to a 
counterparty or a third-party custodian, provided: (1) The initial 
margin requirement is funded by a fully executed written loan 
agreement with an affiliate of the Covered Entity; (2) the loan 
agreement provides that the lender waives re-payment of the loan 
until the initial margin is returned to the Covered Entity; and (3) 
the liability of the Covered Entity to the lender can be fully 
satisfied by delivering the collateral serving as initial margin to 
the lender. Id.
    \101\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46508.
    \102\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46508.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The deduction (haircut) required for purposes of this capital 
condition would be determined by dividing the amount of the Covered 
Entity's total risk-weighted assets by 12.5 (i.e., the reciprocal of 
8%).\103\ Under the Basel standard, Covered Entities must risk-weight 
their assets.\104\ This involves adjusting the nominal value of each 
asset based on the inherent market or credit risk of the asset. Less 
risky assets are adjusted to lower values (i.e., have less weight) than 
more risky assets. As a result, Covered Entities must hold lower levels 
of regulatory capital for less risky assets and higher levels of 
capital for riskier assets. The Commission's proposal to use risk-
weighted assets to calculate the deduction was designed to be similar 
to how haircuts are calculated under Exchange Act rule 18a-1 insomuch 
as less risky assets incur lower haircuts than riskier assets and, 
therefore, require less net capital to be held in relation to 
them.\105\ Consequently, the Commission stated that the process of 
risk-weighting assets under the Basel capital standard provides a 
method to account for the inherent risk in an asset held by a Covered 
Entity similar to how the haircuts under the Exchange Act rule 18a-1 
account for the risk of assets held by SBS Entities.\106\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \103\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46508-09. Under the Basel capital standard, 
Covered Entities must hold regulatory capital equal to at least 8% 
of the amount of their risk-weighted assets. See BCBS, Risk-based 
capital requirements (RBC20), available at: https://www.bis.org/basel_framework/chapter/RBC/20.htm?inforce=20191215&published=20191215.
    \104\ See BCBS, Risk-based capital requirements (RBC20).
    \105\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46508-09.
    \106\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46509.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed approach to calculating the deduction for the capital 
condition would have required a Covered Entity to divide the total 
amount of its risk-weighted assets by 12.5. In proposing to use the 
total amount of risk-weighted assets, the Commission acknowledged that 
a Covered Entity's total risk-weighted assets include components in 
addition to credit and market risk charges (e.g., operational risk 
charges).\107\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \107\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46509, n.87.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commenters addressed two aspects of the additional four pronged 
capital condition and made recommendations as to how they believed it 
should be clarified or modified.\108\ One of the commenters stated that 
the recommendations with respect to the Amended Order ``apply equally 
to the UK and French Orders.'' \109\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \108\ See Letter from Andrew Nash, Managing Director, Morgan 
Stanley (July 20, 2021) (``Morgan Stanley Letter'') at 1-3; SIFMA II 
Letter at 4-7. The Morgan Stanley Letter may be found on the 
Commission's website at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-16-20s/s71620.htm.
    \109\ See SIFMA II Letter at 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    First, commenters made recommendations about how to calculate total 
liabilities.\110\ In particular, commenters requested that the 
calculation of total liabilities exclude instruments that qualify as 
Tier 2 capital under the Basel capital standard, including subordinated 
debt instruments that qualify as Tier 2

[[Page 59806]]

capital.\111\ Commenters pointed out that Exchange Act rule 18a-1 
recognizes subordinated debt that meets certain requirements as a form 
of regulatory capital.\112\ In addition, commenters stated that Covered 
Entities are generally subject to a minimum requirement for own funds 
and eligible liabilities (referred to as ``MREL'') in connection with 
supporting ``bail-in'' tools of resolution regimes.\113\ Commenters 
requested that eligible liabilities under MREL also be excluded from 
the total liabilities calculation because the MREL liabilities share 
key characteristics with Tier 2 capital, including the condition that 
the liabilities satisfy certain requirements related to maturity, 
subordination, repayment, ownership, reduction, and/or conversion.\114\ 
Further, a commenter provided a table comparing the requirements for 
debt to qualify as capital under Exchange Act rule 18a-1, as Tier 2 
capital under the Basel capital standard, and as an eligible liability 
under MREL.\115\ The commenter stated that debt to qualifying as Tier 2 
capital under the Basel capital standard or an eligible liability under 
MREL has ``characteristics comparable to subordinated loans that 
qualify'' as capital under Exchange Act rule 18a-1.\116\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \110\ See Morgan Stanley Letter; SIFMA II Letter.
    \111\ See Morgan Stanley Letter at 2-3; SIFMA II Letter at 5.
    \112\ See Morgan Stanley Letter at 3; SIFMA II Letter at 5.
    \113\ See SIFMA II Letter at 5.
    \114\ See SIFMA II Letter at 6.
    \115\ See SIFMA II Letter, Appendix.
    \116\ See SIFMA II Letter at 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In response to these comments, the Commission believes it would be 
appropriate to exclude subordinated debt issued by the Covered Entity 
that qualifies as Tier 2 capital under the Basel Capital standard from 
the calculation of total liabilities for purposes of the capital 
condition.\117\ Exchange Act rule 18a-1 permits subordinated debt that 
meets certain requirements to count as regulatory capital by excluding 
the liability from the calculation of net worth for purposes of 
computing net capital.\118\ Subordinated debt that qualifies for this 
treatment under Exchange Act rule 18a-1 and subordinated debt that 
qualifies as Tier 2 capital under the Basel capital standard have 
comparable characteristics in terms of requirements relating to minimum 
terms, effective subordination, permissive prepayments, and 
accelerating maturity.\119\ The Commission, however, does not believe 
other types of instruments that might qualify as Tier 2 capital under 
the Basel standard should be excluded from liabilities for the purposes 
of the capital condition. Exchange rule 18a-1 makes a specific 
allowance for subordinated debt. Similarly, the Commission does not 
believe eligible liabilities under MREL should be excluded from 
liabilities for the purposes of the capital condition. While these 
liabilities may share characteristics with subordinated debt that 
qualifies as Tier 2 capital, they do not qualify as Common Equity Tier 
1, Additional Tier 1, or Tier 2 capital under the Basel capital 
standard.\120\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \117\ See paras. (c)(1)(iii)(A)(1) and (c)(1)(iii)(C) of the 
Amended Order.
    \118\ See 17 CFR 240.18a-1(c)(1)(ii).
    \119\ Compare 17 CFR 240.18a-1d, with CRR Article 63.
    \120\ See BRRD.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To implement this modification, the term ``total liabilities'' in 
the capital condition has been replaced with the term ``adjusted 
liabilities.'' \121\ Further, the term ``adjusted liabilities'' has 
been defined to mean the Covered Entity's total liabilities, excluding 
subordinated debt issued by the Covered Entity that qualifies as Tier 2 
capital pursuant to the Basel capital standard.\122\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \121\ See paras. (c)(1)(iii)(A)(1) and (c)(1)(iii)(A)(2)(b) of 
the Amended Order.
    \122\ See para. (c)(1)(iii)(C) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Second, commenters made recommendations about how to calculate the 
deduction (haircut) derived from risk-weighted assets.\123\ In 
particular, commenters recommended that assets that are not treated as 
liquid assets for purposes of the proposed capital condition be 
excluded from the calculation of total risk-weighted assets.\124\ A 
commenter stated that these assets are excluded from the calculation of 
``liquid assets'' and, therefore, they are subject to a 100 percent 
deduction for purposes of the capital condition.\125\ Therefore, 
including them in the risk-weighted assets deduction would result in 
their being deducted twice for purposes of the capital condition. A 
commenter also requested that components of risk-weighted assets other 
than CRR Part Three, Title III (credit risk) and CRR Part Three, Title 
IV (market risk) be excluded from the calculation of total risk-
weighted assets.\126\ In particular, the commenter requested that the 
following components be excluded: (1) CRR Part Three, Title III 
(operational risk); (2) CRR Part Three, Title IV (settlement risk); and 
CRR Part Three, Title VI (credit valuation adjustment risk). The 
commenter stated that the standardized or model-based haircuts required 
by Exchange Act rule 18a-1 address credit and market risk and that the 
parallel requirements under the Basel capital standard are the 
calculations under CRR Part Three, Title III (credit risk) and CRR Part 
Three, Title IV (market risk). A commenter stated that calculations 
under CRR Part Three, Title III (operational risk), (2) CRR Part Three, 
Title IV (settlement risk), and CRR Part Three, Title VI (credit 
valuation adjustment risk) are not directly analogous to the 
Commission's net capital requirements and may not be suitable for 
inclusion in the risk-weighted assets used to calculate the deduction 
(haircut) for purposes of the proposed capital condition.\127\ Finally, 
a commenter stated that excluding these assets from risk-weighted 
assets would be straightforward and transparent process since a Covered 
Entity must track illiquid assets and must separately compute the 
different categories of risk-weighted assets under the Basel capital 
standard.\128\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \123\ See Morgan Stanley Letter; SIFMA II Letter.
    \124\ See Morgan Stanley Letter at 2; SIFMA II Letter at 6-7.
    \125\ See SIFMA II Letter at 6.
    \126\ See SIFMA II Letter at 7.
    \127\ See Morgan Stanley Letter at 2, n.4.
    \128\ See SIFMA II Letter at 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In response to these comments, the Commission believes it would be 
appropriate to exclude assets that are not treated as liquid assets for 
purposes of the capital condition from the amount of the risk-weighted 
assets used to calculate the deduction.\129\ These illiquid assets will 
be deducted entirely from the Covered Entity's assets prior to applying 
the deduction derived from the Covered Entity's risk-weighted assets. 
Consequently, their illiquidity will be addressed in that first step of 
the calculation. The Commission also believes it would be appropriate 
to exclude risk-weighted assets that are calculated under CRR Part 
Three, Title III (Own Funds Requirements for Operational Risk) from the 
amount of the risk-weighted assets used to calculate the 
deduction.\130\ Under Exchange Act rule 18a-1, SBS Entities that are 
approved to use models must take market and credit risk 
deductions.\131\ The proposed capital condition is modeled, in part, on 
the provisions of Exchange Act rule 18a-1 applicable to SBS Entities 
approved to use models.\132\ The provisions of Exchange Act rule 18a-1 
governing the use of models by SBS Entities do not

[[Page 59807]]

require operational risk charges. The Commission, however, does not 
agree that risk-weighted assets calculated under CRR Part Three, Title 
IV (settlement risk) and CRR Part Three, Title VI (credit valuation 
adjustment risk) should be excluded from the amount of the risk-
weighted assets used to calculate the deduction. These components do 
relate to credit risk.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \129\ See paras. (c)(1)(iii)(D)(1) and (2) of the Amended Order.
    \130\ See paras. (c)(1)(iii)(D)(1) and (2) of the Amended Order.
    \131\ See 17 CFR 240.18a-1(e).
    \132\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46507-08.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To implement these modifications, the Amended Order provides that a 
Covered Entity may exclude assets that are not treated as liquid assets 
for the purposes of the capital condition and risk-weighted assets that 
are calculated under CRR Part Three, Title III (Own Funds Requirements 
for Operational Risk) from the amount of the risk-weighted assets used 
to calculate the deduction.\133\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \133\ See para. (c)(1)(iii)(D)(2) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The French and UK Orders also include the four pronged additional 
capital condition.\134\ In light of the modifications to the four 
pronged capital condition in the Amended Order, the Commission is 
issuing an order that makes conforming amendments to the French and UK 
Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \134\ See French Order, 86 FR 41630-36, 41659; UK Order, 86 FR 
43338-44, 43372.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to these comments on the four pronged capital 
condition, commenters responded to questions the Commission asked about 
a Covered Entity operating under waivers from capital and liquidity 
requirements that can be granted by German and EU authorities under 
Articles 7 and 8 of the CRR.\135\ Under Articles 7 and 8 of the CRR, 
supervisory authorities can grant a Covered Entity a waiver from EU and 
German capital and liquidity requirements, respectively, if its parent 
is subject to them. The Bafin's Amended Application requested 
substituted compliance for Covered Entities operating pursuant to these 
waivers.\136\ The Bafin stated that this type of waiver is only granted 
under strict conditions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \135\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46524 (requesting comment on this topic). See 
also Morgan Stanley Letter; SIFMA II Letter (responding to the 
request for comment).
    \136\ Amended Application Annex A category 3 (Side Letter 
Addressing Capital Requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed Amended Order required the Covered Entity (i.e., the 
registrant itself) to be subject to the specified EU and German capital 
and liquidity requirements. Accordingly, it would not have provided 
substituted compliance for Exchange Act rule 18a-1 to a Covered Entity 
operating pursuant to these waivers. However, the Commission requested 
comment on whether a positive substituted compliance determination 
(subject to conditions and limitations) could be made with respect to a 
Covered Entity operating pursuant to a waiver from compliance with the 
Basel capital and liquidity requirements.\137\ Specifically, the 
Commission requested comment on whether additional conditions could be 
imposed on a Covered Entity operating pursuant to these waivers that 
could produce a comparable regulatory outcome to Exchange Act rule 18a-
1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \137\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46524.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commenters supported permitting a firm operating under the Article 
7 waiver from the German and EU capital requirements to apply 
substituted compliance to Exchange Act rule 18a-1.\138\ A commenter 
stated that relevant competent authorities will only approve a request 
for a waiver if the Covered Entity and holding company satisfy a number 
of requirements that are designed to ensure that resources would be 
available to the Covered Entity to substantially the same extent absent 
a waiver.\139\ This commenter stated that competent authorities will 
not approve a waiver unless Covered Entity and its holding company can 
demonstrate that there are not structural or corporate impediments to 
the free transfer of funds between the entities, the parent is 
sufficiently involved in setting the risk appetite and risk management 
of the Covered Entity; and the Covered Entity complies with the group's 
risk management policy. Commenters also stated that the level of 
oversight by European and German supervisors over a Covered Entity 
operating pursuant to the waiver is no different than the level of 
oversight exercised with respect to a Covered Entity that is not 
operating pursuant to the waiver.\140\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \138\ See Morgan Stanley Letter at 1-2; SIFMA II Letter at 7.
    \139\ See SIFMA II Letter at 7.
    \140\ See SIFMA II Letter at 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is not prepared at the this time to permit a Covered 
Entity that is operating under an Article 7 and/or 8 waiver to apply 
substituted compliance to Exchange Act rule 18a-1. The Commission's 
preliminary substituted compliance determination with respect to 
Exchange Act rule 18a-1 was based, in part, on the Covered Entity being 
subject to and complying with the Basel capital standard.\141\ In fact, 
all of the Commission's substituted compliance determinations are 
conditioned on the Covered Entity being subject to and complying with 
comparable requirements of the home jurisdiction. Further, Exchange Act 
rule 3a71-6 provides that the Commission will consider (in addition to 
any conditions imposed) whether the capital requirements of the foreign 
financial regulatory system are designed to help ensure the safety and 
soundness of registrants in a manner that is comparable to the 
applicable provisions arising under the Exchange Act and its rules and 
regulations (emphasis added). Exchange Act rule 18a-1 does not have a 
comparable provision under which an SBS Entity can obtain a waiver from 
the requirements of that rule if its immediate holding company is 
subject to the rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \141\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46505-07.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    However, the Commission also believes it would be appropriate to 
provide additional time for a Covered Entity located in Germany and 
operating under the Article 7 waiver to take steps necessary to comply 
with the terms and conditions of the Amended Order or otherwise address 
the fact that it does not meet the those terms and conditions. 
Otherwise, the Covered Entity may have to drastically reduce its 
operations on November 1, 2021 (the SBS Entity registration date), 
which could cause severe disruptions to the services the Covered Entity 
provides its security-based swap customers. Therefore, the Commission, 
by order, is extending the compliance date for Exchange Act rule 18a-1 
until January 1, 2022 for a Covered Entity located in Germany that is 
operating under an Article 7 waiver.
    Finally, commenters requested that the application of the 
additional capital conditions be delayed until September 1, 2022.\142\ 
A commenter stated that Covered Entities did not have effective notice 
of the additional capital conditions until the issuance of the French 
Order on July 23, 2021, and that there is not sufficient time between 
that date and the November 1, 2021 registration date to come into 
compliance with the capital conditions.\143\ The commenter stated that 
Covered Entities must put in place systems for performing the 
calculations required by the additional four pronged capital condition. 
Further, this commenter stated that complying with the capital 
conditions by November 1, 2021 may create significant challenges with 
the senior officer certification required in connection with 
registration, which requires a certification that a Covered Entity has 
developed and implemented policies and procedures

[[Page 59808]]

reasonably designed to prevent violations of Federal securities laws 
and regulations.\144\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \142\ See Morgan Stanley Letter at 4; SIFMA II Letter at 10.
    \143\ See SIFMA II Letter at 9.
    \144\ See SIFMA II Letter at 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In response to the comments requesting a delay in compliance with 
the capital conditions until September 1, 2022, the Commission 
acknowledges that Covered Entities will have a limited period of time 
to comply with the conditions before the November 1, 2021 registration 
compliance date. Substituted compliance, however, is conditioned upon 
the capital conditions in the Amended Order and it is important for 
Covered Entities to comply with these conditions in order for German 
and European capital requirements to have comparable outcomes to 
Exchange Act rule 18a-1. Consequently, in order to balance the limited 
timeframe to achieve compliance with the capital conditions with the 
policy goals of comparability, the Commission is, by order, extending 
the time when a Covered Entity needs to meet the additional capital 
condition in paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of the Amended Order until January 
1, 2022. The Commission similarly is, by order, extending the time to 
meet the capital condition in paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of the French Order 
and (c)(1)(iii) of the UK Order until January 1, 2022.
2. Margin
    Substituted compliance with respect to the margin requirements of 
Exchange Act rule 18a-3 was subject to two additional conditions. The 
first additional condition required a Covered Entity to collect 
variation margin, as defined in the EMIR Margin RTS, from a 
counterparty with respect to a transaction in non-cleared security-
based swaps, unless the counterparty would qualify for an exception 
under Exchange Act rule 18a-3 from the requirement to deliver variation 
margin to the Covered Entity. This additional condition was designed to 
close the gap between the counterparty exceptions of Exchange Act rule 
18a-3 and the EU and German margin rules with respect to variation 
margin. The second additional condition required a Covered Entity to 
collect initial margin, as defined in the EMIR Margin RTS, from a 
counterparty with respect to transactions in non-cleared security-based 
swaps, unless the counterparty would qualify for an exception under 
Exchange Act rule 18a-3 from the requirement to deliver initial margin 
to a Covered Entity. This additional condition was designed to close 
the gap between the counterparty exceptions of Exchange Act rule 18a-3 
and the EU and German margin rules with respect to initial margin.
    The Commission did not receive any comments on the margin 
conditions in the proposed Amended Order. A commenter, however, 
recommended that the application of the additional margin conditions be 
delayed until September 1, 2022.\145\ A commenter stated that Covered 
Entities did not have effective notice of the additional margin 
conditions until the issuance of the French Order on July 23, 2021, and 
that there is not sufficient time between that date and the November 1, 
2021 registration date to come into compliance with the capital 
conditions.\146\ The commenter stated that in connection with the 
margin requirements, a Covered Entity will need to work with 
counterparties to determine which counterparties may be subject to 
exemptions for initial and/or variation margin under the Exchange Act 
rule 18a-3. In addition, if counterparties are subject to Exchange Act 
rule 18a-3, a commenter stated that a Covered Entity will need to enter 
into written agreements and put in place systems necessary to collect 
margin.\147\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \145\ See SIFMA II Letter at 9-10.
    \146\ See SIFMA II Letter at 9.
    \147\ See SIFMA II Letter at 9-10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is adopting the margin conditions as proposed.\148\ 
In response to comments regarding a delay in compliance with the margin 
conditions until September 1, 2022, the Commission is, by order, 
extending the time when a Covered Entity needs to meet the additional 
margin conditions in paragraphs (c)(2)(ii) and (iii) of the Amended 
Order until January 1, 2022. The Commission similarly is, by order, 
extending the time to meet the margin conditions in paragraphs 
(c)(2)(ii) and (iii) the French Order and paragraphs (c)(2)(ii) and 
(iii) of the UK Order until January 1, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \148\ See para. (c)(2) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

VI. Amendments Related to Chief Compliance Officer Reports

A. Proposed Approach

    Exchange Act rule 15Fk-1 states that the required compliance 
reports must include ``a certification by the chief compliance officer 
or senior officer that, to the best of his or her knowledge and 
reasonable belief and under penalty of law, the information contained 
in the compliance report is accurate and complete in all material 
respects.'' \149\ The standard applied in the German Order required 
certification that ``under penalty of law, the report is accurate and 
complete.'' \150\ The Commission preliminarily believed that, 
consistent with the French Order,\151\ further alignment of the 
proposed Amended Order's certification requirement with that of the 
applicable Exchange Act rule was appropriate. Therefore, the proposed 
Amended Order clarified that the required reports should be certified 
by ``the chief compliance officer or senior officer'' of the Covered 
Entity and that the same certification standard contained in Exchange 
Act rule 15Fk-1 applies.\152\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \149\ Exchange Act rule 15Fk-1(c)(2)(ii)(D), 17 CFR 240.15Fk-
1(c)(2)(ii)(D). See also Exchange Act rule 15Fk-1(e)(2) (defining 
``senior officer'' as ``the chief executive officer or other 
equivalent officer'').
    \150\ See para. (d)(2) of the German Order.
    \151\ See French Order, 86 FR 41659; UK Order, 86 FR 43372.
    \152\ See para. (d)(2)(ii)(B) of the proposed Amended Order. In 
addition, for consistency with the French Order, the Commission is 
proposing to incorporate CRR articles 286-88 and 293 and EMIR Margin 
RTS article 2 as part of para. (d)(3) of the proposed Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In further seeking consistency with the Commission's other 
substituted compliance orders,\153\ the Commission proposed to amend 
the German Order to clarify the timing for Covered Entities to submit 
compliance reports to the Commission. To promote timely notice 
comparable to what the Exchange Act rule provides, the Commission 
proposed to incorporate a timing standard that accounts for MiFID-
required timing as well as the possibility that the relevant reports 
may be submitted to the management body early. Under the proposed 
Amended Order, the applicable compliance reports would be provided to 
the Commission no later than 15 days following the earlier of: (i) The 
submission of the report to the Covered Entity's management body; or 
(ii) the time the report is required to be submitted to the management 
body.\154\ The proposed Amended Order also clarified that together the 
reports must cover the entire period that the Covered Entity's annual 
compliance report referenced in Exchange Act section 15F(k)(3) and 
Exchange Act rule 15Fk-1(c) would be required to cover.\155\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \153\ See, e.g., French Order, 86 FR 41659.
    \154\ See para. (d)(2)(D) of the proposed Amended Order.
    \155\ See para. (d)(2)(E) of the proposed Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Commenters Views and Final Provisions

    No commenters addressed the proposed changes to the compliance 
report requirements and the Commission is issuing the changes described 
in part VI.A above as proposed.

[[Page 59809]]

VII. Amendments Related to Counterparty Protection Requirements

A. Proposed Approach

1. Disclosure of Information Regarding Material Risks and 
Characteristics
    With the Amended Order, the Commission proposed to add two 
requirements to the list of German and EU disclosure of information 
regarding material incentives or conflicts of interest requirements 
that the Covered Entity must be subject to and comply with. The MAR 
Investment Recommendations Regulation articles 5 and 6 enumerate 
specific obligations in relation to disclosure of interests or of 
conflicts of interest. Article 5 requires that persons who produce 
recommendations disclose in their recommendations all relationships and 
circumstances that may reasonably be expected to impair the objectivity 
of the recommendation, including interests or conflicts of interest. 
Article 6 imposes additional obligations on certain entities, including 
the disclosure of information on their interests and conflicts of 
interest concerning the issuer to which a recommendation relates. The 
Commission preliminarily believed that requiring Covered Entities to be 
subject to and comply with MAR Investment Recommendations Regulation 
articles 5 and 6 contributes to a determination that relevant German 
and EU requirements produce regulatory outcomes that are comparable to 
relevant requirements of Exchange Act rule 15Fh-3(b).
2. Fair and Balanced Communications
    The Commission also proposed to modify the fair and balanced 
communications section of the proposed Amended Order.\156\ First, the 
Commission believes that German and EU fair and balanced communications 
requirements are more comparable to Exchange Act requirements when 
considering three additional EU requirements: MAR article 20(1) would 
require the Covered Entity to present recommendations in a manner that 
ensures the information is objectively presented and to disclose 
interests and conflicts of interest concerning the financial 
instruments to which the information relates. MAR Investment 
Recommendations Regulation article 3 would require a Covered Entity to 
communicate only recommendations that present facts in a way that they 
are clearly distinguished from interpretations, estimates, opinions and 
other types of non-factual information; label clearly and prominently 
projections, forecasts and price targets; indicate the relevant 
material assumptions and substantial material sources of information; 
and include only reliable information or a clear indication when there 
is doubt about reliability. MAR Investment Recommendations Regulation 
article 4 would require the Covered Entity to provide in its 
recommendation additional information about the factual basis of its 
recommendation. Accordingly, the Commission proposed to add these three 
requirements to the Amended Order's list of German and EU fair and 
balanced communications requirements that the Covered Entity must be 
subject to and comply with.\157\ Second, the German Order required the 
Covered Entity to be subject to and comply with MAR Investment 
Recommendations Regulation article 5,\158\ which relates to obligations 
to disclose conflicts of interest. As discussed above, the Commission 
is requiring Covered Entities to comply with this requirement and with 
MAR Investment Recommendations Regulation article 6 when using 
substituted compliance for disclosure of material incentives and 
conflicts of interest requirements. Accordingly, the Commission 
believes that MAR Investment Recommendations Regulation article 5 is 
less relevant to comparability of fair and balanced communications 
requirements and proposed to delete the reference to it in relation to 
substituted compliance for fair and balanced communications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \156\ See para. (e)(2)(iii) of the proposed Amended Order.
    \157\ See para. (e)(5) of the Amended Order.
    \158\ See para. (d)(2) of the German Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Commenters Views and Final Provisions

    Commenters did not address the proposed revisions to the 
counterparty protection requirements described in part VII.A above and 
the Commission is amending and restating this part of the Amended Order 
as proposed.

VIII. Amendments Related to Recordkeeping, Reporting, Notification, and 
Securities Count Requirements

A. Proposed Approach

    In its initial application (the ``BaFin Application''), the BaFin 
requested, in part, substituted compliance for requirements applicable 
to SBS Entities with and without a prudential regulator under the 
Exchange Act relating to:
     Recordmaking--Exchange Act rule 18a-5 requires prescribed 
records to be made and kept current.\159\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \159\ See 17 CFR 240.18a-5. The BaFin Application discusses 
German requirements that address firms' record creation obligations 
related to matters such as financial condition, operations, 
transactions, counterparties and their property, personnel and 
business conduct. See BaFin Application Annex A category 2 at 4-34.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Record Preservation--Exchange Act rule 18a-6 requires 
preservation of records.\160\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \160\ See 17 CFR 240.18a-6. The BaFin Application discusses 
German requirements that address firms' record preservation 
obligations related to records that firms are required to create, as 
well as additional records such as records of communications. See 
BaFin Application Annex A category 2 at 35-79.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Reporting--Exchange Act rule 18a-7 requires certain 
reports.\161\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \161\ See 17 CFR 240.18a-7. The BaFin Application discusses 
German requirements that address firms' obligations to make certain 
reports. See BaFin Application Annex A category 2 at 80-91, 96-102.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Notification--Exchange Act rule 18a-8 requires 
notification to the Commission when certain financial or operational 
problems occur.\162\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \162\ See 17 CFR 240.18a-8. The BaFin Application discusses 
German requirements that address firms' obligations to make certain 
notifications. See BaFin Application Annex A category 2 at 92-96, 
102.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Securities Count--Exchange Act rule 18a-9 requires non-
prudentially regulated security-based swap dealers to perform a 
quarterly securities count.\163\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \163\ See 17 CFR 240.18a-9. The BaFin Application discusses 
German requirements that address firms' obligations to perform 
securities counts. See BaFin Application Annex A category 2 at 27-
30.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Daily Trading Records--Exchange Act section 15F(g) 
requires SBS Entities to maintain daily trading records.\164\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \164\ See 15 U.S.C. 78o-10(g). The BaFin Application discusses 
German requirements that address firms' record preservation 
obligations related to records that firms are required to create, as 
well as additional records such as records of communications. See 
BaFin Application Annex A category 2 at 35-79.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Taken as a whole, the recordkeeping, reporting, notification, and 
securities count requirements that apply to SBS Entities are designed 
to promote the prudent operation of the firm's security-based swap 
activities, assist the Commission in conducting compliance examinations 
of those activities, and alert the Commission to potential financial or 
operational problems that could impact the firm and its customers.
    In issuing the German Order, the Commission found that relevant EU 
and German requirements, subject to conditions and limitations, would 
produce regulatory outcomes that are comparable to the outcomes 
associated with the recordkeeping, reporting, and notification 
requirements of Exchange Act rules 18a-5, 18a-6, 18a-7, and 18a-8 
applicable to SBS Entities with a prudential regulator.\165\ However, 
the BaFin Application did not seek substituted compliance for the 
Exchange Act capital and margin requirements

[[Page 59810]]

applicable to SBS Entities without a prudential regulator. Because of 
the close relationship between many of the Exchange Act recordkeeping, 
reporting, and notification requirements and the administration and 
oversight of Exchange Act capital and margin requirements, the German 
Order did not address substituted compliance for recordkeeping, 
reporting, notification, and securities count requirements applicable 
to SBS Entities without a prudential regulator.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \165\ See German Order, 85 FR 85695-97.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The BaFin's Amended Application requested substituted compliance 
for the Exchange Act capital and margin requirements applicable to SBS 
Entities without a prudential regulator. Consequently, the Commission 
considered substituted compliance for the recordkeeping, reporting, 
notification, and securities count requirements applicable to SBS 
Entities without a prudential regulator.\166\ The Commission also 
considered substituted compliance with respect to the trading record 
preservation requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(g), which are 
applicable to SBS Entities with and without a prudential 
regulator.\167\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \166\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46512-522.
    \167\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46522.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission preliminarily concluded that the relevant EU and 
German requirements, subject to conditions and limitations, would 
produce regulatory outcomes that are comparable to the outcomes 
associated with the requirements of Exchange Act rules 18a-5, 18a-6, 
18a-7, 18a-8, and 18a-9 applicable to SBS Entities without a prudential 
regulator and to the outcomes associated with Exchange Act section 
15F(g) applicable to all SBS Entities (collectively, the ``Exchange Act 
Recordkeeping an Reporting Requirements'').\168\ Moreover, the proposed 
structure of the substituted compliance determinations with respect to 
Exchange Act rules 18a-5, 18a-6, 18a-7, and 18a-8 (collectively, the 
``recordkeeping, reporting, and notification rules'') would have 
provided Covered Entities with greater flexibility to select distinct 
requirements within the broader rules for which they want to apply 
substituted compliance.\169\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \168\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46512-22.
    \169\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46512-22.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Commenter Views and Final Provisions

    As was the case with German Order, the Commission's preliminary 
substituted compliance determinations for the additional Exchange Act 
Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements were subject to the condition 
that the Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the relevant 
German or EU laws.\170\ Substituted compliance for all of the Exchange 
Act Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements accordingly is conditioned 
on Covered Entities being subject to and complying with the EU and 
German provisions that in the aggregate establish a framework that 
produces outcomes comparable to those associated with the analogous 
Exchange Act Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements.\171\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \170\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46530-33.
    \171\ See paras. (f)(1)(i)(A)(1), (f)(1)(i)(B)(1), 
(f)(1)(i)(C)(1), (f)(1)(i)(D)(1), (f)(1)(i)(E), (f)(1)(i)(F)(1), 
(f)(1)(i)(G)(1), (f)(1)(i)(H)(1), (f)(1)(i)(I)(1), (f)(1)(i)(J)(1), 
(f)(1)(i)(K), (f)(1)(i)(L)(1), (f)(1)(i)(M)(1), (f)(1)(i)(N)(1), 
(f)(1)(i)(O)(1), (f)(2)(i)(A), (f)(2)(i)(B), (f)(2)(i)(C)(1), 
(f)(2)(i)((D), (f)(2)(i)(E)(1), (f)(2)(i)(F)(1), (f)(2)(i)(G)(1), 
(f)(2)(i)(H)(1), (f)(2)(i)(O)(1), (f)(2)(i)(C)(1), (f)(2)(i)(J)(1), 
(f)(2)(i)(K)(1), (f)(2)(i)(L)(1), (f)(2)(i)(M), (f)(2)(i)(N)(1), 
(f)(2)(i)(P)(1), (f)(2)(i)(Q), (f)(2)(i)(R), (f)(3)(i)(A), 
(f)(3)(ii)(B), (f)(e)(iii)(A), (f)(3)(iv)(A), (f)(4)(i)(A)(1), 
(f)(4)((ii)(B), (f)(4)(iii)(A)(1), (f)(4)(iv)(D)(1), (f)(5)(i), and 
(f)(6) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to making preliminary substituted compliance 
determinations with respect to requirements of Exchange Act rules 18a-
5, 18a-6, 18a-7, 18a-8, and 18a-9 applicable to SBS Entities without a 
prudential regulator and to the requirements of Exchange Act section 
15F(g) applicable to all SBS Entities, the Commission proposed to amend 
the German Order in a number of ways.\172\ The proposed amendments are 
discussed below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \172\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46512-22, 46530-33.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. General Considerations
    The Commission proposed to amend the German Order in ways that 
would implicate two or more of Exchange Act rules 18a-5, 18a-6, 18a-7, 
and 18a-8.
    First, the German Order made substituted compliance available with 
respect to the entirety of Exchange Act rules 18a-5, 18a-6, 18a-7, and 
18a-8 as applicable to Covered Entities with a prudential 
regulator.\173\ Consequently, under the German Order, the Covered 
Entity could elect to apply substituted compliance with respect to the 
entire rule (subject to conditions and limitations) or, alternatively, 
comply with the Exchange Act rule. The Commission proposed modifying 
this approach to provide all Covered Entities with greater flexibility 
to select which distinct requirements within the broader rule for which 
they would apply substituted compliance.\174\ This would not preclude a 
Covered Entity from applying substituted compliance for the entire rule 
(subject to conditions and limitations). However, it would permit the 
Covered Entity to apply substituted compliance with respect to certain 
requirements of a given rule and to comply directly with the remaining 
requirements. This more granular approach to the recordkeeping, 
reporting, and notification rules was intended to permit Covered 
Entities to leverage existing recordkeeping and reporting systems that 
are designed to comply with the broker-dealer recordkeeping, reporting, 
and notification requirements on which the recordkeeping, reporting, 
and notification requirements applicable to SBS Entities are based. For 
example, it may be more efficient for a Covered Entity to comply with 
certain Exchange Act requirements within a given recordkeeping, 
reporting, or notification rule (rather than apply substituted 
compliance) because it can utilize systems that its affiliated broker-
dealer has implemented to comply with them. This proposed approach was 
consistent with the approach taken by the Commission in the French and 
UK Orders.\175\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \173\ See German Order, 85 FR 85699-700.
    \174\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46512-13, 46530-33.
    \175\ See French Order, 86 FR 41649; UK Order, 86 FR 43360.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As applied to Exchange Act rules 18a-5 and 18a-6, this approach of 
providing greater flexibility resulted in preliminary substituted 
compliance determinations with respect to the different categories of 
records these rules require SBS Entities to make, keep current, and/or 
preserve.\176\ The objective of these rules--taken as a whole--is to 
assist the Commission in monitoring and examining for compliance with 
substantive Exchange Act requirements applicable to SBS Entities (e.g., 
capital and margin requirements) as well as to promote the prudent 
operation of these firms.\177\ The Commission stated a preliminary 
belief that the comparable EU and German recordkeeping rules achieve 
these outcomes with respect to compliance with substantive EU and 
German requirements for which preliminary positive substituted 
compliance

[[Page 59811]]

determinations were being made (e.g., the preliminary positive 
substituted compliance determinations with respect to the Exchange Act 
capital and margin requirements).\178\ At the same time, the 
recordkeeping rules address different categories of records through 
distinct requirements within the rules. Each requirement with respect 
to a specific category of records (e.g., paragraph (a)(2) of Exchange 
Act rule 18a-5 addressing ledgers (or other records) reflecting all 
assets and liabilities, income and expense and capital accounts) can be 
viewed in isolation as a distinct recordkeeping rule. Therefore, the 
Commission made preliminary substituted compliance determinations at 
this level of Exchange Act rules 18a-5 and 18a-6.\179\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \176\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46513, 46530-32.
    \177\ See, e.g., Exchange Act Release No. 71958 (Apr. 17, 2014), 
79 FR 25194, 25199-200 (May 2, 2014).
    \178\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46513.
    \179\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46513, 46530-32.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission did not receive any comments on this proposed 
approach and the Amended Order structures the substituted compliance 
determinations in this manner.\180\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \180\ See paras. (f)(1), (f)(2), (f)(3), and (f)(4) of the 
Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Second, the Commission did not make a preliminary positive 
substituted compliance determination with respect to a discrete 
provision of the Exchange Act Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements 
if it was fully or partially linked to a substantive Exchange Act 
requirement for which substituted compliance was not available or for 
which a preliminary positive substituted compliance determination was 
not being made.\181\ In particular, a preliminary positive substituted 
compliance determination was not made, in full or in part, for 
recordkeeping, reporting, or notification requirements linked to the 
following Exchange Act rules for which substituted compliance is not 
available or a positive substituted compliance determination was not 
made: (1) Exchange Act rule 15Fh-4; (2) Exchange Act rule 15Fh-5; (3) 
Exchange Act rule 15Fh-6; (4) Exchange Act rule 18a-2; (5) Exchange Act 
rule 18a-4; (6) Regulation SBSR; and (7) Form SBSE and its variations. 
This proposed approach was consistent with the approach taken by the 
Commission in the French and UK Orders.\182\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \181\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46513.
    \182\ See French Order, 86 FR 41650; UK Order, 86 FR 43361.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission did not receive comment on these limitations and the 
Amended Order includes the limitations.\183\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \183\ See paras. (f)(1)(i)(J)(3), (f)(1)(ii)(C), 
(f)(2)(i)(E)(3), (f)(2)(i)(H)(4), (f)(2)(i)(H)(5), (f)(2)(i)(L)(2), 
(f)(2)(ii)(B), (f)(4)(i)(C)(2), (f)(4)(i)(D)(3), (f)(4)(i)(D)(4), 
(f)(4)(ii)(B), and (f)(4)(ii)(C) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Third, the Commission conditioned substituted compliance with 
discrete provisions of the Exchange Act Recordkeeping and Reporting 
Requirements that were fully or partially linked to a substantive 
Exchange Act requirement for which substituted compliance was available 
on the Covered Entity applying substituted compliance with respect to 
the linked Exchange Act requirement.\184\ In particular, substituted 
compliance for a provision of the Exchange Act Recordkeeping and 
Reporting Requirements that is linked to the following Exchange Act 
rules was conditioned on the SBS Entity applying substituted compliance 
to the linked substantive Exchange Act rule: (1) Exchange Act rule 
15Fh-3; (2) Exchange Act rule 15Fi-2; (3) Exchange Act rule 15Fi-3; (4) 
Exchange Act rule 15Fi-4; (5) Exchange Act rule 15Fi-5; (6) Exchange 
Act rule 15Fk-1; (7) Exchange Act rule 18a-1; (8) Exchange Act rule 
18a-3; (9) Exchange Act rule 18a-5; (10) Exchange Act rule 18a-
6(b)(1)(viii); and (11) Exchange Act rule 18a-7. This proposed approach 
was consistent with the approach taken by the Commission in the French 
and UK Orders.\185\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \184\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46513-22, 46530-33.
    \185\ See French Order, 86 FR 41650; UK Order, 86 FR 43361.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission did not receive comment on these proposed conditions 
and the Amended Order includes the conditions.\186\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \186\ See paras. (f)(1)(i)(G)(2), (f)(1)(i)(L)(2), 
(f)(1)(i)(M)(2), (f)(1)(i)(M)(3), (f)(1)(i)(N)(2), (f)(1)(i)(O)(2), 
(f)(2)(i)(E)(2), (f)(2)(i)(H)(2), (f)(2)(i)(H)(3), (f)(2)(i)(I)(2), 
(f)(2)(i)(J)(2), (f)(2)(i)(K)(2), (f)(2)(i)(K)(3), (f)(2)(i)(P)(2), 
(f)(3)(i)(C), (f)(3)(i)(D), (f)(3)(ii)(B), (f)(3)(iii)(C), 
(f)(3)(iv)(C), (f)(3)(iv)(D), (f)(4)(i)(A)(2), and (f)(4)(i)(D)(2) 
of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Fourth, the Commission conditioned substituted compliance with 
discrete provisions of the Exchange Act Recordkeeping and Reporting 
Requirements that would be important for monitoring or examining 
compliance with the capital rule for nonbank security-based swap 
dealers on the Covered Entity applying substituted compliance with 
respect to the capital rule (i.e., the Rule 18a-1 Condition).\187\ This 
approach was designed to ensure that, if the Covered Entity does not 
apply substituted compliance with respect to Exchange Act rule 18a-1, 
it makes and preserves records and files reports that the Commission 
uses to monitor and examine for compliance with the Exchange Act rule 
18a-1, and that the firm makes and preserves records to assist it in 
complying with these rules. This proposed approach was consistent with 
the approach taken by the Commission in the French and UK Orders.\188\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \187\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46514-15, 46530-33.
    \188\ See French Order, 86 FR 41650-51; UK Order, 86 FR 43361.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission did not receive comment on these proposed conditions 
and the Amended Order includes the conditions.\189\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \189\ See paras. (f)(1)(i)(A)(2), (f)(1)(i)(B)(2), 
(f)(1)(i)(C)(2), (f)(1)(i)(D)(2), (f)(1)(i)(F)(2), (f)(1)(i)(H)(2), 
(f)(1)(i)(I)(2), (f)(1)(i)(J)(2), (f)(2)(i)(C)(2), (f)(2)(i)(F)(2), 
(f)(2)(i)(G)(2), (f)(2)(i)(N)(2), (f)(2)(i)(O)(2), and (f)(5)(ii) of 
the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Fifth, the proposed Amended Order would allow a Covered Entity to 
apply substituted compliance on a transaction-by-transaction basis to 
the Commission's recordkeeping requirements that are linked with the 
counterparty protection requirements of Exchange Act rule 15Fh-3.\190\ 
This approach was designed to align with the proposed Amended Order 
allowing Covered Entities to apply substituted compliance on a 
transaction-by-transaction basis for the Commission's counterparty 
protection requirements. This proposed approach was consistent with the 
approach taken by the Commission in the French and UK Orders.\191\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \190\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46514-21, 46530-32.
    \191\ See French Order, 86 FR 41613; UK Order, 86 FR 43324-25.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission did not receive comment on this proposed approach 
and the Amended Order permits substituted compliance to be applied in 
this manner.\192\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \192\ See paras. (f)(1)(ii)(B) and (f)(2)(ii)(A) of the Amended 
Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Sixth, the proposed Amended Order included a condition that Covered 
Entities must promptly furnish to a representative of the Commission 
upon request an English translation of any record, report, or 
notification of the Covered Entity that is required to be made, 
preserved, filed, or subject to examination pursuant to Exchange Act 
section 15F of this Order.\193\ This proposed approach was consistent 
with

[[Page 59812]]

the approach taken by the Commission in the French and UK Orders.\194\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \193\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46522, 46533.
    \194\ See French Order, 86 FR 41651; UK Order, 86 FR 43361.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission did not receive comment on this proposed condition 
and the Amended Order includes the condition.\195\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \195\ See para. (f)(8) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Exchange Act Rule 18a-5
    The proposed Amended Order conditioned substituted compliance in 
connection with the record making requirements of Exchange Act rule 
18a-5 applicable to Covered Entities without a prudential regulator on 
the firm: (1) Preserving all of the data elements necessary to create 
the records required by Exchange Act rules 18a-5(a)(1), (2), (3), (4), 
and (7); and (2) upon request furnishing promptly to representatives of 
the Commission the records required by those rules (``SEC Format 
Condition'').\196\ This proposed condition is modeled on the 
alternative compliance mechanism in paragraph (c) of Exchange Act rule 
18a-5. In effect, a Covered Entity applying substituted compliance with 
respect to these requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-5 would need to 
comply with the comparable EU and German requirements. However, under 
the SEC Format Condition, the Covered Entity would need to produce a 
record that is formatted in accordance with the requirements of 
Exchange Act rule 18a-5 at the request of Commission staff. The 
objective would be to require--on a very limited basis--the production 
of a record that consolidates the information required by Exchange Act 
rules 18a-5(a)(1), (2), (3), (4), and (7) in a single record and, as 
applicable, in a blotter or ledger format. This would assist the 
Commission staff in reviewing the information on the record.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \196\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46515, 46531. The German Order included this 
condition for a Covered Entity with a prudential regular to apply 
substituted compliance for Exchange Act rule 18a-5. See German 
Order, 85 FR 85699.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission did not receive any comment on this proposed 
condition and the Amended Order includes the condition.\197\ However, 
for consistency with the UK Order, the Commission is modifying 
paragraph (f)(1)(i)(M)(2) of the Amended Order to clarify that 
substituted compliance for the portions of Exchange Act rules 18a-
5(a)(17) and (b)(13) relating to Exchange Act rule 15Fh-3 is 
conditioned on the Covered Entity applying substituted compliance for 
the relevant paragraphs of Exchange Act rule 15Fh-3, rather than the 
entirety of Exchange Act rule 15Fh-3. To promote consistency with the 
other EU jurisdictions, the Commission also is modifying the same 
condition in paragraph (f)(1)(i)(M)(2) of the French Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \197\ See para. (f)(1)(ii)(A) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Exchange Act Rule 18a-6
    The Amended Order did not extend substituted compliance to the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(f) to keep books and records 
open to inspection by any representative of the Commission and the 
requirement of Exchange Act rule 18a-6(g) to furnish promptly to a 
representative of the Commission legible, true, complete, and current 
copies of those records of the Covered Entity without a prudential 
regulator that are required to be preserved under Exchange Act rule 
18a-6, or any other records of the Covered Entity that are subject to 
examination or required to be made or maintained pursuant to Exchange 
Act section 15F that are requested by a representative of the 
Commission.\198\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \198\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46517, 46533. The German Order did not extend 
substituted compliance to these requirements as applicable to a 
Covered Entity with a prudential regular. See German Order, 85 FR 
85700.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission did not receive any comments on this proposed 
limitation and the Amended Order includes the limitation, which now 
applies to Covered Entities with and without a prudential 
regulator.\199\ In addition, for consistency with the UK Order, the 
Commission is modifying paragraph (f)(2)(i)(K)(2) of the Amended Order 
to clarify that substituted compliance for the portions of Exchange Act 
rules 18a-6(a)(17) and (b)(13) relating to Exchange Act rule 15Fh-3 is 
conditioned on the Covered Entity applying substituted compliance for 
the relevant paragraphs of Exchange Act rule 15Fh-3, rather than the 
entirety of Exchange Act rule 15Fh-3. To promote consistency with the 
other EU jurisdictions, the Commission also is modifying the same 
condition in paragraph (f)(2)(i)(K)(2) of the French Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \199\ See para. (f)(7) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. Exchange Act Rule 18a-7
    Paragraph (a)(2) of Exchange Act rule 18a-7 requires SBS Entities 
with a prudential regulator to file the FOCUS Report Part IIC on a 
quarterly basis. The German Order provided substituted compliance for 
this requirement subject to the condition that the Covered Entity file 
with the Commission periodic unaudited financial and operational 
information in the manner and format specified by the Commission by 
order or rule (``Manner and Format Condition'') and present the 
financial information in accordance with GAAP that the firm uses to 
prepare general purpose publicly available or available to be issued 
financial statements in Germany (``German GAAP Condition'').\200\ The 
Amended Order continues to provide Covered Entities with a prudential 
regulator substituted compliance for paragraph (a)(2) of Exchange Act 
rule 18a-7, subject to the Manner and Format and German GAAP 
Conditions.\201\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \200\ See German Order, 85 FR 85700. See also Exchange Act 
Release No. 93335 (Oct. 14, 2021) (order specifying the manner and 
format of filing unaudited financial and operational information by 
Covered Entities relying on substituted compliance determinations 
with respect to Exchange Act rule 18a-7).
    \201\ See para. (f)(3)(i) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Paragraph (a)(1) of Exchange Act rule 18a-7 requires SBS Entities 
without a prudential regulator to file the FOCUS Report Part II on a 
monthly basis. The proposed Amended Order would provide Covered 
Entities without a prudential regulator substituted compliance for 
paragraph (a)(1) of Exchange Act rule 18a-7 subject to the Manner and 
Format and German GAAP conditions.\202\ However, there were two 
additional conditions. First, the Covered Entity would need to apply 
substituted compliance for Exchange Act Rule 18a-1 (i.e., substituted 
compliance would be subject to the Rule 18a-1 Condition). Second, the 
Covered Entity would need to apply substituted compliance with respect 
to Exchange Act rule 18a-6(b)(1)(viii) (a record preservation 
requirement). This record preservation requirement is directly linked 
to the financial and operational reporting requirements of Exchange Act 
rule 18a-7(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \202\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46518, 46532.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission did not receive comment on these proposed conditions 
and the Amended Order includes the conditions.\203\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \203\ See para. (f)(3)(i) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Paragraphs (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), and (h) of Exchange Act rule 
18a-7 set forth requirements for SBS Entities that are not prudentially 
regulated to annually file financial statements and certain reports, as 
well as reports covering those statements and reports prepared by an 
independent public accountant.\204\ The Commission proposed amending 
the German Order to make substituted compliance available with respect 
to these requirements, subject to six

[[Page 59813]]

additional conditions.\205\ The first condition would be that the 
Covered Entity simultaneously sends a copy of the financial statements 
the Covered Entity is required to file with EU or German authorities, 
including a report of an independent public accountant covering the 
financial statements, to the Commission in the manner specified on the 
Commission's website (``SEC Filing Condition''). Because EU and German 
laws would not otherwise require the financial statements and report of 
the independent public accountant covering the financial statements to 
be filed with the Commission, the purpose of this condition would be to 
provide the Commission with the financial statements and report to more 
effectively supervise and monitor Covered Entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \204\ See 17 CFR 240.18a-7(c) through (h).
    \205\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46519-20, 46532-33.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The second condition would be that the Covered Entity include with 
the transmission of the annual financial statements and report the 
contact information of an individual who can provide further 
information about the financial statements and reports (``Contact 
Information Condition''). This would assist the Commission staff in 
promptly contacting an individual at the Covered Entity who can respond 
to questions that information on the financial statements or report may 
raise about the Covered Entity's financial or operational condition.
    The third condition would be that the Covered Entity includes with 
the transmission the report of an independent public accountant 
required by Exchange Act rule 18a-7(c)(1)(i)(C) covering the annual 
financial statements if EU and German laws do not require the Covered 
Entity to engage an independent public accountant to prepare a report 
covering the annual financial statements (``Accountant's Report 
Condition''). The third condition further would provide that the report 
of the independent public accountant may be prepared in accordance with 
generally accepted auditing standards (``GAAS'') in Germany that are 
used to perform audit and attestation services and the accountant 
complies with German independence requirements. According to the BaFin 
Application, German laws only require certain investment firms 
(depending on their size) to have their financial statements audited, 
so this condition would be designed to ensure that all SBS Entities 
subject to the requirement in rule 18a-7 to file audited annual reports 
are required to have their financial statements audited.
    The fourth condition would be that a Covered Entity that is a 
security-based swap dealer would need to file the reports required by 
Exchange Act rule 18a-7(c)(1)(i)(B) and (C) addressing the statements 
identified in Exchange Act rule 18a-7(c)(3) or (c)(4), as applicable, 
that relate to Exchange Act rule 18a-4 (``Rule 18a-4 Limited 
Exclusion'').\206\ These reports are designed to provide the Commission 
with information about an SBS Entity's compliance with Rule 18a-4. 
Substituted compliance is not available for Exchange Act rule 18a-4 
and, therefore, this condition is designed to provide the Commission 
with similar compliance information. Under this condition, Covered 
Entities would need to file a limited compliance report that includes 
the statements relating to Rule 18a-4 \207\ or an exemption report if 
the Covered Entity claims an exemption from Rule 18a-4. The Covered 
Entity also would need to file the report of an independent public 
accountant covering the limited compliance report or exemption report. 
The fourth condition further would provide that the report of the 
independent public accountant may be prepared in accordance with GAAS 
in Germany that are used to perform audit and attestation services and 
the accountant complies with German independence requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \206\ This was viewed as a limited exclusion from the 
availability of substituted compliance for these requirements 
because the proposed Amended Order would permit these reports 
relating Exchange Act rule 18a-4 to be included with the German 
regulatory reports the Covered Entities would file with the 
Commission and because the reports could be prepared in accordance 
with German GAAS (as discussed below).
    \207\ The limited compliance report would not need to address 
Exchange Act rule 18a-9 if the Covered Entity is applying 
substituted compliance to this requirement. Further, as discussed 
above, substituted compliance with paras. (c) through (h) of 
Exchange Act rule 18a-7 is conditioned on the Covered Entity 
applying substituted compliance to Exchange Act rule 18a-1. 
Therefore, the Covered Entity would not need to address that rule in 
the compliance report. Finally, the Covered Entity would not need to 
address an account statement rule of a self-regulatory organization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The fifth condition would be that a Covered Entity that is a major 
security-based swap participant would need to file the supporting 
schedules required by Exchange Act rule 18a-7(c)(1)(i)(A) and (C) 
addressing the statements identified in Exchange Act rules 18a-
7(c)(2)(ii) and (iii) that relate to Exchange Act rule 18a-2 for which 
the proposed Amended Order would not provide substituted compliance. 
These supporting schedules are the Computation of Tangible Net Worth.
    The sixth condition would be that a Covered Entity that is a 
security-based swap dealer would need to file the supporting schedules 
required by Exchange Act rule 18a-7(c)(1)(i)(A) and (C) addressing the 
statements identified in Exchange Act rules 18a-7(c)(2)(ii) and (iii) 
that relate to Exchange Act rule 18a-4 and 18a-4a if the Covered Entity 
is not exempt from Exchange Act rule 18a-4 (i.e., the Rule 18a-4 
Limited Exclusion). These supporting schedules are the Computation for 
Determination of Security-Based Swap Customer Reserve Requirements and 
the Information Relating to the Possession or Control Requirements for 
Security-Based Swap Customers, which are designed to provide the 
Commission with information about an SBS Entity's compliance with Rule 
18a-4. Substituted compliance for Exchange Act rule 18a-4 is not 
available.
    The Commission did not receive any comment on these proposed 
conditions and the Amended Order includes the conditions.\208\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \208\ See para. (f)(3)(iv)(B) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

5. Exchange Act Rule 18a-8
    Exchange Act rule 18a-8 requires SBS Entities to send notifications 
to the Commission if certain adverse events occur.\209\ The German 
Order provided substituted compliance for the requirements of Exchange 
Act rule 18a-8 applicable to SBS Entities with a prudential regulator 
(subject to conditions and limitations).\210\ In particular, the 
requirements of: (1) Paragraph (c) of Exchange Act rule 18a-8 that an 
SBS Entity that is a security-based swap dealer and that files a notice 
of adjustment to its reported capital category with a U.S. prudential 
regulator must transmit a copy of the notice to the Commission; (2) 
paragraph (d) of the rule that an SBS Entity provide notification to 
the Commission if it fails to make and keep current books and records 
under Exchange Act rule 18a-5 and to transmit a subsequent report on 
steps being taken to correct the situation; (3) and paragraph (h) of 
the rule setting forth how to make the notifications required by 
Exchange Act 18a-8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \209\ See 17 CFR 240.18a-8.
    \210\ See German Order, 85 FR 85700.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under the German Order, substituted compliance in connection with 
the notification requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-8 were subject 
to the conditions that the Covered Entity: (1) Simultaneously sends a 
copy of any notice required to be sent by EU or German notification 
laws to the Commission in the manner specified on

[[Page 59814]]

the Commission's website (i.e., the ``SEC Filing Condition''); and (2) 
includes with the transmission the contact information of an individual 
who can provide further information about the matter that is the 
subject of the notice (i.e., the ``Contact Information 
Condition'').\211\ The purpose of these conditions was to alert the 
Commission to financial or operational problems that could adversely 
affect the firm--the objective of Exchange Act rule 18a-8. In addition, 
the German Order did not provide substituted compliance for paragraph 
(g) of Exchange Act rule 18a-8 requiring an SBS Entity that is a 
security-based swap dealer provide to notification if it fails to make 
a required deposit into its special reserve account for the exclusive 
benefit of security-based swap customers under Exchange Act rule 18a-
4.\212\ Substituted compliance is not available for Exchange Act rule 
18a-4. The proposed Amended Order would continue to provide Covered 
Entities with a prudential regulator substituted compliance for the 
notification requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-8 discussed above 
subject to the conditions and limitations.\213\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \211\ See German Order, 85 FR 85700.
    \212\ See German Order, 85 FR 85700.
    \213\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46520.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed Amended Order would provide Covered Entities without a 
prudential regulator substituted compliance for paragraph (d) of 
Exchange Act rule 18a-8, subject to the SEC Filing and Contact 
Information Conditions.\214\ Exchange Act rule 18a-8 has notification 
requirements that apply exclusively to Covered Entities without a 
prudential regulator. In particular, paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (a)(1)(ii), 
(b)(1), (b)(2), and (b)(4) of Exchange Act rule 18a-8 require an SBS 
Entity that is a security-based swap dealer and that does not have a 
prudential regulator to provide notifications related to the capital 
requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-1. Paragraph (e) of Exchange Act 
rule 18a-8, in pertinent part, requires an SBS Entity that is a 
security-based swap dealer and that does not have a prudential 
regulator to provide notification if it has a material weakness under 
Exchange Act rule 18a-7 and to transmit a subsequent report on the 
steps being taken to correct the situation. The Commission conditioned 
substituted compliance for these notification requirements on the SEC 
Filing and Contact Information Conditions.\215\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \214\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46520.
    \215\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46520-21.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission did not receive any comment on these proposed 
conditions and the Amended Order includes the conditions.\216\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \216\ See para. (f)(4)(ii)(A) of the Amended Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IX. Additional Considerations Regarding Supervisory and Enforcement 
Effectiveness Related to Capital and Margin

A. Proposed Approach

    Exchange Act rule 3a71-6(a)(2)(i) provides that the Commission's 
assessments regarding the comparability of foreign requirements in part 
should take into account ``the effectiveness of the supervisory program 
administered, and the enforcement authority exercised'' by the foreign 
financial regulatory authority. This provision is intended to help 
ensure that substituted compliance is not predicated on rules that 
appear high-quality on paper if market participants in practice are 
allowed to fall short of their obligations, while also recognizing that 
differences among supervisory and enforcement regimes should not be 
assumed to reflect flaws in one regime or another.\217\ In the German 
Order, the Commission concluded that the ``relevant supervisory and 
enforcement considerations in German are consistent with substituted 
compliance.'' \218\ BaFin's Amended Application provided the Commission 
with additional information on the supervision and enforcement 
framework for compliance with capital and margin applicable to 
significant credit institutions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \217\ See German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed 
Amended Order, 86 FR 46522-23.
    \218\ See German Order, 85 FR 84697.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In proposing to grant substituted compliance in connection with 
BaFin's Amended Application, the Commission preliminarily concluded 
that the relevant supervisory and enforcement considerations were 
consistent with substituted compliance. That preliminary conclusion 
took into account information regarding BaFin's and the ECB's roles and 
practices in supervising investment firms and credit institutions 
located in Germany, as well as their enforcement-related authority and 
practices.\219\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \219\ German Substituted Compliance Notice and Proposed Amended 
Order, 86 FR 46522-23.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Commenter Views and Final Provisions

    Commenters did not address the Commission's preliminary conclusions 
regarding supervisory and enforcement considerations, and the 
Commission continues to conclude that the relevant supervisory and 
enforcement considerations in Germany are consistent with substituted 
compliance.

X. Conclusion

    It is hereby determined and ordered, pursuant to rule 3a71-6 under 
the Exchange Act, that the Commission's Order dated December 22, 2020, 
granting conditional substituted compliance in connection with certain 
requirements applicable to non-U.S. security-based swap dealers and 
major security-based swap participants subject to regulation in the 
Federal Republic of Germany is amended and restated to provide that a 
Covered Entity (as defined in paragraph (g)(1) of this Order) may 
satisfy the requirements under the Exchange Act that are addressed in 
paragraphs (b) through (f) of this Order so long as the Covered Entity 
is subject to and complies with relevant requirements of the Federal 
Republic of Germany and the European Union and with the conditions of 
this Order, as amended or superseded from time to time.
    (a) General conditions.
    This Order is subject to the following general conditions, in 
addition to the conditions specified in paragraphs (b) through (f):
    (1) Activities as MiFID ``investment services or activities.'' For 
each condition in paragraphs (b) through (f) of this Order that 
requires the application of, and the Covered Entity's compliance with, 
provisions of MiFID, provisions of WpHG that implement MiFID, and/or 
other EU and German requirements adopted pursuant to those provisions, 
the Covered Entity's relevant security-based swap activities constitute 
``investment services'' or ``investment activities,'' as defined in 
MiFID article 4(1)(2) and in WpHG section 2(8), and fall within the 
scope of the Covered Entity's authorization from BaFin to provide 
investment services and/or perform investment activities in the Federal 
Republic of Germany.
    (2) Counterparties as MiFID ``clients.'' For each condition in 
paragraphs (b) through (f) of this Order that requires the application 
of, and the Covered Entity's compliance with, provisions of MiFID, 
provisions of WpHG that implement MiFID and/or other EU and German 
requirements adopted pursuant to those provisions, the relevant 
counterparty (or potential counterparty) to the Covered Entity is a 
``client'' (or potential ``client''), as defined in MiFID article 
4(1)(9) and in WpHG section 67(1).

[[Page 59815]]

    (3) Security-based swaps as MiFID ``financial instruments.'' For 
each condition in paragraphs (b) through (f) of this Order that 
requires the application of, and the Covered Entity's compliance with, 
provisions of MiFID, provisions of WpHG that implement MiFID and/or 
other EU and German requirements adopted pursuant to those provisions, 
the relevant security-based swap is a ``financial instrument,'' as 
defined in MiFID article 4(1)(15) and in WpHG section 2(4).
    (4) Covered Entity as CRD/CRR ``institution.'' For each condition 
in paragraphs (b) through (f) of this Order that requires the 
application of, and the Covered Entity's compliance with, the 
provisions of CRD, provisions of KWG that implement CRD, CRR and/or 
other EU and German requirements adopted pursuant to those provisions, 
the Covered Entity is an ``institution,'' as defined in CRD article 
3(1)(3), in CRR article 4(1)(3) and in KWG section 1(1b).
    (5) Counterparties as EMIR ``counterparties.'' For each condition 
in paragraphs (b) through (f) of this Order that requires the 
application of, and the Covered Entity's compliance with, provisions of 
EMIR, EMIR RTS, EMIR Margin RTS and/or other EU requirements adopted 
pursuant to those provisions, if the relevant provision applies only to 
the Covered Entity's activities with specified types of counterparties, 
and if the counterparty to the Covered Entity is not any of the 
specified types of counterparty, the Covered Entity complies with the 
applicable condition of this Order:
    (i) As if the counterparty were the specified type of counterparty; 
in this regard, if the Covered Entity reasonably determines that the 
counterparty would be a financial counterparty if it were established 
in the EU and authorized by an appropriate EU authority, it must treat 
the counterparty as if the counterparty were a financial counterparty;
    (ii) Without regard to the application of EMIR article 13; and
    (iii) Only to the extent that an Exchange Act section or rule cited 
in paragraphs (b) through (f) of this Order applies to the security-
based swap activities with that counterparty.
    (6) Security-based swap status under EMIR. For each condition in 
paragraphs (b) through (f) of this Order that requires the application 
of, and the Covered Entity's compliance with, provisions of EMIR, EMIR 
RTS, EMIR Margin RTS, and/or other EU requirements adopted pursuant to 
those provisions, if the relevant provision applies to the Covered 
Entity's OTC derivatives or OTC derivative contracts that have not been 
cleared by a central counterparty, then either:
    (i) The relevant security-based swap is an ``OTC derivative'' or 
``OTC derivative contract,'' as defined in EMIR article 2(7), that has 
not been cleared by a central counterparty and otherwise is subject to 
the provisions of EMIR article 11, EMIR RTS articles 11-15, and EMIR 
Margin RTS article 2; or
    (ii) The relevant security-based swap has been cleared by a central 
counterparty that is authorized or recognized to clear derivatives 
contracts by a relevant authority in the EU.
    (7) Memorandum of Understanding with BaFin. The Commission and 
BaFin have a supervisory and enforcement memorandum of understanding 
and/or other arrangement addressing cooperation with respect to this 
Order at the time the Covered Entity complies with the relevant 
requirements under the Exchange Act via compliance with one or more 
provisions of this Order.
    (8) Memorandum of Understanding Regarding ECB-Owned Information. 
The Commission and the ECB have a supervisory and enforcement 
memorandum of understanding and/or other arrangement addressing 
cooperation with respect to this Order as it pertains to information 
owned by the ECB at the time the Covered Entity complies with the 
relevant requirements under the Exchange Act via compliance with one or 
more provisions of this Order.
    (9) Notice to Commission. A Covered Entity relying on this Order 
must provide notice of its intent to rely on this Order by notifying 
the Commission in writing. Such notice must be sent to the Commission 
in the manner specified on the Commission's website. The notice must 
include the contact information of an individual who can provide 
further information about the matter that is the subject of the notice. 
The notice must also identify each specific substituted compliance 
determination within paragraphs (b) through (f) of the Order for which 
the Covered Entity intends to apply substituted compliance. A Covered 
Entity must promptly provide an amended notice if it modifies its 
reliance on the substituted compliance determinations in this Order.
    (10) European Union Cross-Border Matters.
    (i) If, in relation to a particular service provided by a Covered 
Entity, responsibility for ensuring compliance with any provision of 
MiFID or MiFIR or any other EU or German requirement adopted pursuant 
to MiFID or MiFIR listed in paragraphs (b) through (f) of this Order is 
allocated to an authority of the Member State of the European Union in 
whose territory a Covered Entity provides the service, BaFin must be 
the authority responsible for supervision and enforcement of that 
provision or requirement in relation to the particular service.
    (ii) If responsibility for ensuring compliance with any provision 
of MAR or any other EU requirement adopted pursuant to MAR listed in 
paragraphs (b) through (f) of this Order is allocated to one or more 
authorities of a Member State of the European Union, one of such 
authorities must be BaFin.
    (11) Notification Requirements Related to Changes in Capital. A 
Covered Entity that is prudentially regulated relying on this Order 
must apply substituted compliance with respect to the requirements of 
Exchange Act rule 18a-8(c) and the requirements of Exchange Act rule 
18a-8(h) as applied to Exchange Act rule 18a-8(c).
    (b) Substituted compliance in connection with risk control 
requirements.
    This Order extends to the following provisions related to risk 
control:
    (1) Internal risk management. The requirements of Exchange Act 
section 15F(j)(2) and related aspects of Exchange Act rule 15Fh-
3(h)(2)(iii)(I), provided that the Covered Entity is subject to and 
complies with the requirements of: MiFID articles 16 and 23; WpHG 
sections 63, 80, 83 and 84; MiFID Org Reg articles 21-37, 72-76 and 
Annex IV; CRD articles 74, 76 and 79-87, 88(1), 91(1)-(2), 91(7)-(9) 
and 92, 94 and 95; and KWG sections 25a, 25b, 25c (other than 25c(2)), 
25d (other than 25d(3) and 25d(11)), 25e and 25f; CRR articles 286-88 
and 293; and EMIR Margin RTS article 2.
    (2) Trade acknowledgement and verification. The requirements of 
Exchange Act rule 15Fi-2, provided that the Covered Entity is subject 
to and complies with the requirements of EMIR article 11(1)(a) and EMIR 
RTS article 12.
    (3) Portfolio reconciliation and dispute reporting. The 
requirements of Exchange Act rule 15Fi-3, provided that:
    (i) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of EMIR article 11(1)(b) and EMIR RTS articles 13 and 15; 
and
    (ii) The Covered Entity provides the Commission with reports 
regarding disputes between counterparties on the same basis as it 
provides those reports to competent authorities pursuant to EMIR RTS 
article 15(2).
    (4) Portfolio compression. The requirements of Exchange Act rule 
15Fi-4, provided that the Covered Entity is subject to and complies 
with

[[Page 59816]]

the requirements of EMIR RTS article 14.
    (5) Trading relationship documentation. The requirements of 
Exchange Act rule 15Fi-5, other than paragraph (b)(5) to that rule when 
the counterparty is a U.S. person, provided that the Covered Entity is 
subject to and complies with the requirements of EMIR article 11(1)(a), 
EMIR RTS article 12, and EMIR Margin RTS article 2.
    (c) Substituted compliance in connection with capital and margin.
    (1) Capital. The requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and 
Exchange Act rules 18a-1, and 18a-1a through d, provided that:
    (i) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with: CRR, Part 
One (General Provisions) Article 6(1), Part Two (Own Funds), Part Three 
(Capital Requirements), Part Four (Large Exposures), Part Five 
(Exposures to Transferred Credit Risk), Part Six (Liquidity), and Part 
Seven (Leverage); MiFID Org Reg article 23; BRRD, articles 45(6) and 
81(1); CRD, articles 73, 79, 86, 129, 129(1), 130, 130(1), 130(5), 131, 
133, 133(1), 133(4), 141, 142(1) and (2); EMIR Margin RTS, articles 2, 
3(b), 7, and 19(1)(d) and (e), (3) and (8); KWG, sections 10b-10h, 
10i(2)-(9), 25a(1) sentence 3 no. 2 and no. 3 b), 33(1) sentence 1c); 
SAG, section 49(2), 49d, 62(1), 138(1); and SolvV, section 37;
    (ii) The Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act rules 18a-5(a)(9), 18a-6(b)(1)(x), and 
18a-8(a)(1)(i), (a)(1)(ii), (b)(1), (b)(2), and (b)(4) pursuant to this 
Order;
    (iii)(A) The Covered Entity:
    (1) Maintains liquid assets as defined in paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(B) 
that have an aggregate market value that exceeds the amount of the 
Covered Entity's adjusted liabilities as defined in paragraph 
(c)(1)(iii)(C) by at least $100 million before applying the deduction 
specified in paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(D) and by at least $20 million after 
applying the deduction specified in paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(D);
    (2) Makes and preserves for three years a quarterly record that:
    (a) Identifies and values the liquid assets maintained pursuant to 
paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A)(1);
    (b) Compares the amount of the aggregate value the liquid assets 
maintained pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A)(1) to the amount of the 
Covered Entity's total liabilities and shows the amount of the 
difference between the two amounts (``the excess liquid assets 
amount''); and
    (c) Shows the amount of the deduction specified in paragraph 
(c)(1)(iii)(D) and the amount that deduction reduces the excess liquid 
assets amount;
    (3) The Covered Entity notifies the Commission in writing within 24 
hours in the manner specified on the Commission's website if the 
Covered Entity fails to meet the requirements of paragraph 
(c)(iii)(A)(1) and includes in the notice the contact information of an 
individual who can provide further information about the failure to 
meet the requirements; and
    (4) Includes its most recent statement of financial condition filed 
with its local supervisor (whether audited or unaudited) with its 
initial written notice to the Commission of its intent to rely on 
substituted compliance under condition (a)(9) above.
    (B) For the purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A)(1), liquid assets 
are:
    (1) Cash and cash equivalents;
    (2) Collateralized agreements;
    (3) Customer and other trading related receivables;
    (4) Trading and financial assets; and
    (5) Initial margin posted by the Covered Entity to a counterparty 
or a third-party custodian, provided:
    (a) The initial margin requirement is funded by a fully executed 
written loan agreement with an affiliate of the Covered Entity;
    (b) The loan agreement provides that the lender waives re-payment 
of the loan until the initial margin is returned to the Covered Entity; 
and
    (c) The liability of the Covered Entity to the lender can be fully 
satisfied by delivering the collateral serving as initial margin to the 
lender.
    (C) For the purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A)(1), adjusted 
liabilities are the Covered Entity's total liabilities, excluding 
subordinated debt issued by the Covered Entity that qualifies as Tier 2 
capital pursuant to the capital requirements identified in paragraph 
(c)(1)(i).
    (D) The deduction required by paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A) is the 
amount of the Covered Entity's risk-weighted assets, excluding risk-
weighted assets that are included in CRR Part Three, Title III (Own 
Funds Requirements for Operational Risk) and risk-weighted assets that 
are not treated as liquid assets for the purposes of paragraph 
(c)(1)(iii)(A)(1), calculated for the purposes of the capital 
requirements identified in paragraph (c)(1)(i) divided by 12.5.
    (2) Margin. The requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and 
Exchange Act rule 18a-3, provided that:
    (i) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of: EMIR article 11; EMIR Margin RTS; CRR articles 103, 
105(3); 105(10); 111(2), 224, 285, 286, 286(7), 290, 295, 296(2)(b), 
297(1), 297(3), and 298(1); MiFID Org Reg article 23(1); CRD articles 
74 and 79(b); and KWG section 25a(1);
    (ii) The Covered Entity collects variation margin, as defined in 
EMIR Margin RTS, from a counterparty with respect to transactions in 
non-cleared security-based swaps, unless the counterparty would qualify 
for an exception from the collateral collection requirements under 
paragraph (c)(1)(iii) or (c)(2)(iii) of Exchange Act 18a-3;
    (iii) The Covered Entity collects initial margin, as defined in the 
EMIR Margin RTS, from a counterparty with respect to transactions in 
non-cleared security-based swaps, unless the counterparty would qualify 
for an exception from the collateral collection requirements under 
paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of Exchange Act rule 18a-3; and
    (iv) The Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-5(a)(12) pursuant to this Order.
    (d) Substituted compliance in connection with internal supervision 
and compliance requirements and certain Exchange Act section 15F(j) 
requirements.
    This Order extends to the following provisions related to internal 
supervision and compliance and Exchange Act section 15F(j) 
requirements:
    (1) Internal supervision. The requirements of Exchange Act rule 
15Fh-3(h) and Exchange Act sections 15F(j)(4)(A) and (j)(5), provided 
that:
    (i) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements identified in paragraph (d)(3) of this Order;
    (ii) The Covered Entity complies with paragraph (d)(4) of this 
Order; and
    (iii) This paragraph (d) does not extend to the requirements of 
paragraph (h)(2)(iii)(I) to rule 15Fh-3 to the extent those 
requirements pertain to compliance with Exchange Act sections 
15F(j)(2), (j)(3), (j)(4)(B) and (j)(6), or to the general and 
supporting provisions of paragraph (h) to rule 15Fh-3 in connection 
with those Exchange Act sections.
    (2) Chief compliance officers. The requirements of Exchange Act 
section 15F(k) and Exchange Act rule 15Fk-1, provided that:
    (i) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements identified in paragraph (d)(3) of this Order;
    (ii) All reports required pursuant to MiFID Org Reg article 
22(2)(c) must also:

[[Page 59817]]

    (A) Be provided to the Commission at least annually, and in the 
English language;
    (B) Include a certification signed by the chief compliance officer 
or senior officer (as defined in Exchange Act rule 15Fk-1(e)(2)) of the 
Covered Entity that, to the best of the certifier's knowledge and 
reasonable belief and under penalty of law, the report is accurate and 
complete in all material respects;
    (C) Address the Covered Entity's compliance with:
    (i) Applicable requirements under the Exchange Act; and
    (ii) The other applicable conditions of this Order in connection 
with requirements for which the Covered Entity is relying on this 
Order;
    (D) Be provided to the Commission no later than 15 days following 
the earlier of:
    (i) The submission of the report to the Covered Entity's management 
body; or
    (ii) The time the report is required to be submitted to the 
management body; and
    (E) Together cover the entire period that the Covered Entity's 
annual compliance report referenced in Exchange Act section 15F(k)(3) 
and Exchange Act rule 15Fk-1(c) would be required to cover.
    (3) Applicable supervisory and compliance requirements. Paragraphs 
(d)(1) and (d)(2) are conditioned on the Covered Entity being subject 
to and complying with the following requirements: MiFID articles 16 and 
23; WpHG sections 63, 80, 83 and 84; MiFID Org Reg articles 21-37, 72-
76 and Annex IV; CRD articles 74, 76, 79-87, 88(1), 91(1)-(2), 91(7)-
(9) and 92, 94 and 95; and KWG sections 25a, 25b, 25c (other than 
25c(2)), 25d (other than 25d(3) and 25d(11)), 25e and 25f, and CRR 
articles 286-88 and 293; and EMIR Margin RTS article 2.
    (4) Additional condition to paragraph (d)(1). Paragraph (d)(1) 
further is conditioned on the requirement that the Covered Entity 
complies with the provisions specified in paragraph (d)(3) as if those 
provisions also require compliance with:
    (i) Applicable requirements under the Exchange Act; and
    (ii) The other applicable conditions of this Order in connection 
with requirements for which the Covered Entity is relying on this 
Order.
    (e) Substituted compliance in connection with counterparty 
protection requirements.
    This Order extends to the following provisions related to 
counterparty protection:
    (1) Disclosure of information regarding material risks and 
characteristics. The requirements of Exchange Act rule 15Fh-3(b) 
relating to disclosure of material risks and characteristics of one or 
more security-based swaps subject thereto, provided that the Covered 
Entity, in relation to that security-based swap, is subject to and 
complies with the requirements of MiFID article 24(4), WpHG sections 
63(7) and 64(1) and MiFID Org Reg articles 48-50.
    (2) Disclosure of information regarding material incentives or 
conflicts of interest. The requirements of Exchange Act rule 15Fh-3(b) 
relating to disclosure of material incentives or conflicts of interest 
that a Covered Entity may have in connection with one or more security-
based swaps subject thereto, provided that the Covered Entity, in 
relation to that security-based swap, is subject to and complies with 
the requirements of either:
    (i) MiFID article 23(2)-(3); WpHG section 63(2); and MiFID Org Reg 
articles 33-35;
    (ii) MiFID article 24(9); WpHG section 70; and MiFID Delegated 
Directive article 11(5); or
    (iii) MAR article 20(1) and MAR Investment Recommendations 
Regulation articles 5 and 6.
    (3) ``Know your counterparty.'' The requirements of Exchange Act 
rule 15Fh-3(e), as applied to one or more security-based swap 
counterparties subject thereto, provided that the Covered Entity, in 
relation to the relevant security-based swap counterparty, is subject 
to and complies with the requirements of MiFID article 16(2); WpHG 
section 80(1); MiFID Org Reg articles 21-22, 25-26 and applicable parts 
of Annex I; CRD articles 74(1) and 85(1); KWG section 25a; MLD articles 
11 and 13; GwG sections 10-11; MLD articles 8(3) and 8(4)(a) as applied 
to internal policies, controls and procedures regarding recordkeeping 
of customer due diligence activities; and GwG section 6(1)-(2) as 
applied to vigilance measures regarding recordkeeping of customer due 
diligence activities.
    (4) Suitability. The requirements of Exchange Act rule 15Fh-3(f), 
as applied to one or more recommendations of a security-based swap or 
trading strategy involving a security-based swap subject thereto, 
provided that:
    (i) The Covered Entity, in relation to the relevant recommendation, 
is subject to and complies with the requirements of MiFID articles 
24(2)-(3) and 25(1)-(2); WpHG sections 63(5)-(6), 80(9)-(13) and 87(1)-
(2); and MiFID Org Reg articles 21(1)(b) and (d), 54 and 55; and
    (ii) The counterparty to which the Covered Entity makes the 
recommendation is a ``professional client'' mentioned in MiFID Annex II 
section I and WpHG section 67(2) and is not a ``special entity'' as 
defined in Exchange Act section 15F(h)(2)(C) and Exchange Act rule 
15Fh-2(d).
    (5) Fair and balanced communications. The requirements of Exchange 
Act rule 15Fh-3(g), as applied to one or more communications subject 
thereto, provided that the Covered Entity, in relation to the relevant 
communication, is subject to and complies with the requirements of:
    (i) Either MiFID articles 24(1), (3) and WpHG sections 63(1), (6) 
or MiFID article 30(1) and WpHG section 68(1); and
    (ii) MiFID articles 24(4)-(5); WpHG sections 63(7) and 64(1); MiFID 
Org Reg articles 46-48; MAR articles 12(1)(c), 15 and 20(1); and MAR 
Investment Recommendations Regulation articles 3 and 4.
    (6) Daily mark disclosure. The requirements of Exchange Act rule 
15Fh-3(c), as applied to one or more security-based swaps subject 
thereto, provided that the Covered Entity is required to reconcile, and 
does reconcile, the portfolio containing the relevant security-based 
swap on each business day pursuant to EMIR articles 11(1)(b) and 11(2) 
and EMIR RTS article 13.
    (f) Substituted compliance in connection with recordkeeping, 
reporting, notification, and securities count requirements.
    This Order extends to the following provisions that apply to a 
Covered Entity related to recordkeeping, reporting, notification and 
securities counts:
    (1)(i) Make and keep current certain records. The requirements of 
the following provisions of Exchange Act rule 18a-5, provided that the 
Covered Entity complies with the relevant conditions in this paragraph 
(f)(1)(i) and with the applicable conditions in paragraph (f)(1)(ii):
    (A) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-5(a)(1) or (b)(1), as 
applicable, provided that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of MiFID Org Reg articles 74, 75, and Annex IV; and MiFIR 
article 25(1); and
    (2) With respect to the requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-
5(a)(1), the Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-
1 through 18a-1d pursuant to this Order.
    (B) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-5(a)(2), provided 
that:

[[Page 59818]]

    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of CRD article 73; MiFID Delegated Directive article 2; 
MiFID Org Reg articles 72, 74 and 75; EMIR article 39(4); KWG section 
10a; and WpHG section 84; and
    (2) The Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-
1 through 18a-1d pursuant to this Order;
    (C) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-5(a)(3) or (b)(2), as 
applicable, provided that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of MiFID Delegated Directive article 2; MiFID Org Reg 
articles 72, 74 and 75; EMIR article 39(4); and WpHG section 84; and
    (2) With respect to the requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-
5(a)(3), the Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-
1 through 18a-1d pursuant to this Order;
    (D) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-5(a)(4) or (b)(3), as 
applicable, provided that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of CRR article 103; MiFID articles 16(6), 25(5), and 
25(6); MiFID Org Reg articles 59, 74, 75 and Annex IV; MiFIR article 
25(1); EMIR articles 9(2) and 11(1)(a); WpHG sections 63 and 64; and
    (2) With respect to the requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-
5(a)(4), the Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-
1 through 18a-1d pursuant to this Order;
    (E) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-5(b)(4) provided that 
the Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the requirements of 
MiFID Org Reg article 59; EMIR articles 9(2) and 11(1)(a); MiFID 
articles 16(6), 25(5), and 25(6); and WpHG sections 63, 64, and 83 
paragraphs 1 and 2;
    (F) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-5(a)(5) or (b)(5), as 
applicable, provided that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of MiFID Org Reg articles 74, 75 and Annex IV; and MiFIR 
article 25(1); and
    (2) With respect to the requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-
5(a)(5), the Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-
1 through 18a-1d pursuant to this Order;
    (G) The requirements of Exchange Act rules 18a-5(a)(6) and (a)(15) 
or (b)(6) and (b)(11), as applicable, provided that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of CRR articles 103, 105(3), and 105(10); CRD article 73; 
MiFID articles 16(6), 25(5), 25(6); MiFID Delegated Directive article 
2; MiFID Org Reg articles 59, 74, 75, and Annex IV; MiFIR article 
25(1); EMIR articles 9(2), 11(1)(a), and 39(4); KWG section 10a; and 
WpHG sections 63, 64, 83 paragraphs 1 through 2, and 84; and
    (2) The Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act rule 15Fi-2 pursuant to this Order;
    (H) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-5(a)(7) or (b)(7), as 
applicable, provided that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of MiFIR article 25(1); MLD4 articles 11 and 13; MiFID 
article 25(2); WpHG section 64 paragraph 3; and GWG sections 10 and 11; 
and
    (2) With respect to the requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-
5(a)(7), the Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-
1 through 18a-1d pursuant to this Order;
    (I) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-5(a)(8), provided 
that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of CRR articles 103, 105(3), and 105(10); MiFID Org Reg 
articles 59, 74, 75 and Annex IV; MiFIR article 25(1); EMIR articles 
9(2), 11(1)(a), and 39(4); MiFID articles 16(6), 25(5), and 25(6); CRD 
article 73; MiFID Delegated Directive article 2; WpHG sections 63, 64, 
83 paragraphs 1 through 2, and 84; and KWG section 10a; and
    (2) The Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-
1 through 18a-1d pursuant to this Order.;
    (J) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-5(a)(9), provided 
that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of CRD article 73; MiFID Delegated Directive article 2; 
EMIR article 39(4); MiFID Org Reg articles 72, 74, and 75; KWG section 
10a; and WpHG Section 84;
    (2) The Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-
1 through 18a-1d pursuant to this Order; and
    (3) This Order does not extend to the requirements of Exchange Act 
rule 18a-5(a)(9) relating to Exchange Act rule 18a-2;
    (K) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-5(a)(10) and (b)(8), 
provided that the Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of MiFID Org Reg articles 21(1)(d), 35; CRD articles 88, 
91(1), 91(8); MiFID article 9(1) and 16(3); KWG sections 15, 25a(1), 
25c(1) through (3), 25c(4a), 25d(1) through (3), 25d(7), 25d(11), and 
36; and WpHG sections 81(1) and 84;
    (L) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-5(a)(12), provided 
that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of CRR articles 103, 105(3) and 105(10); MiFID Org Reg. 
articles 72, 74 and 75; CRD article 73; MiFID Delegated Directive 
article 2; KWG section 10a; and WpHG section 84; and
    (2) The Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rule 18a-3 
pursuant to this Order;
    (M) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-5(a)(17) and (b)(13), 
as applicable, regarding one or more provisions of Exchange Act rules 
15Fh-3 or 15Fk-1 for which substituted compliance is available under 
this Order, provided that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of MiFID Org Reg articles 72, 73, and Annex I; MiFID 
articles 16(6) and 25(2); MLD articles 11 and 13; EMIR article 39(5); 
WpHG sections 64 paragraph 3 and 83 paragraph 1; and GWG sections 10 
and 11, in each case with respect to the relevant security-based swap 
or activity;
    (2) With respect to the portion of Exchange Act rule 18a-5(a)(17) 
and (b)(13) that relates to one or more provisions of Exchange Act rule 
15Fh-3 for which substituted compliance is available under this Order, 
the Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for such business 
conduct standard(s) of Exchange Act rule 15Fh-3 pursuant to this Order, 
as applicable, with respect to the relevant security-based swap or 
activity; and
    (3) With respect to the portion of Exchange Act rule 18a-5(a)(17) 
and (b)(13) that relates to Exchange Act rule 15Fk-1, the Covered 
Entity applies substituted compliance for Exchange Act section 15F(k) 
and Exchange Act rule 15Fk-1 pursuant to this Order;
    (N) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-5(a)(18)(i) and (ii) 
or (b)(14)(i) and (ii), as applicable, provided that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of

[[Page 59819]]

EMIR article 11(1)(b); and EMIR RTS article 15(1)(a); and
    (2) The Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for Exchange 
Act rule 15Fi-3 pursuant to this Order; and
    (O) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-5(a)(18)(iii) or 
(b)(14)(iii), as applicable, provided that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of EMIR article 11(1)(b); and EMIR RTS article 15(1)(a), 
in each case with respect to such security-based swap portfolio(s); and
    (2) The Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for Exchange 
Act rule 15Fi-4 pursuant to this Order.
    (ii) Paragraph (f)(1)(i) is subject to the following further 
conditions:
    (A) Paragraphs (f)(1)(i)(A) through (D) and (H) are subject to the 
condition that the Covered Entity preserves all of the data elements 
necessary to create the records required by the applicable Exchange Act 
rules cited in such paragraphs and upon request furnishes promptly to 
representatives of the Commission the records required by those rules;
    (B) A Covered Entity may apply the substituted compliance 
determination in paragraph (f)(1)(i)(M) to records of compliance with 
Exchange Act rule 15Fh-3(b), (c), (e), (f) and (g) in respect of one or 
more security-based swaps or activities related to security-based 
swaps; and
    (C) This Order does not extend to the requirements of Exchange Act 
rule 18a-5(a)(13), (a)(14), (a)(16), (b)(9), (b)(10) or (b)(12).
    (2)(i) Preserve certain records. The requirements of the following 
provisions of Exchange Act rule 18a-6, provided that the Covered Entity 
complies with the relevant conditions in this paragraph (f)(2)(i) and 
with the applicable conditions in paragraph (f)(2)(ii):
    (A) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-6(a)(1) or (a)(2), as 
applicable, provided that the Covered Entity is subject to and complies 
with the requirements of MiFID Org Reg articles 72, 74, 75, and Annex 
IV; CRR article 103; MiFIR article 25(1); EMIR article 9(2); MiFID 
articles 16(6) and 69(2); CRD article 73; MiFID Delegated Directive 
article 2; WpHG sections 6, 7, 83 paragraph 1, and 84; and KWG section 
10a;
    (B) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-6(b)(1)(i) or 
(b)(2)(i), as applicable, provided that the Covered Entity is subject 
to and complies with the requirements of MiFID Org Reg articles 72, 74, 
75, and Annex IV; CRR article 103; MiFIR article 25(1); EMIR article 
9(2); MiFID articles 16(6) and 69(2); CRD article 73; MiFID Delegated 
Directive article 2; WpHG sections 6, 7, 83 paragraph 1, and 84; and 
KWG section 10a;
    (C) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-6(b)(1)(ii) and 
(iii), provided that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of MiFID Org Reg articles 72, 74 and 75; EMIR article 
9(2); CRD article 73; MiFID Delegated Directive article 2; MiFID 16(6); 
KWG section 10a; and WpHG sections 83 paragraph 1, and 84; and
    (2) The Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-
1 through 18a-1d pursuant to this Order;
    (D) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-6(b)(1)(iv) or 
(b)(2)(ii), as applicable, provided that the Covered Entity is subject 
to and complies with the requirements of CRR article 103; MiFID Org Reg 
articles 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, Annex I and Annex IV; MiFIR article 25(1); 
EMIR article 9(2); CRD article 73; MiFID articles 16(6), 16(7); MiFID 
Delegated Directive article 2; KWG section 10a; and WpHG sections 83 
paragraphs 1 and 3 through 8, and 84;
    (E) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-6(b)(1)(v), provided 
that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of EMIR article 9(2); CRR articles 99, 294, 394, 415, 430 
and Part Six: Title II and Title III; CRR Reporting ITS article 14 and 
annexes I-V and VIII-XIII; and MiFID Org Reg article 72(1);
    (2) With respect to the requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-
6(b)(1)(v), the Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-
1 through 18a-1d pursuant this Order; and
    (3) This Order does not extend to the requirements of Exchange Act 
rule 18a-6(b)(1)(v) relating to Exchange Act rule 18a-2;
    (F) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-6(b)(1)(vi) or 
(b)(2)(iii), as applicable, provided that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of EMIR article 9(2); MiFID Org Reg articles 72(1) and 73; 
MiFID article 16(6); and WpHG section 83 paragraph 1; and
    (2) With respect to the requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-
6(b)(1)(vi), the Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-
1 through 18a-1d pursuant to this Order;
    (G) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-6(b)(1)(vii) or 
(b)(2)(iv), as applicable, provided that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of MiFID Org Reg articles 72(1) and 73; MiFIR article 
25(1); EMIR article 9(2); MiFID article 16(6); and WpHG section 83 
paragraph 1; and
    (2) With respect to the requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-
6(b)(1)(vii), the Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-
1 through 18a-1d pursuant to this Order;
    (H) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-6(b)(1)(viii), 
provided that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of CRR articles 99, 294, 394, 415, 430 and Part Six: Title 
II and Title III; CRR Reporting ITS article 14 and annexes I-V and 
VIII-XIII, as applicable; and MiFID Org Reg article 72(1);
    (2) The Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-7(a)(1), (b), (c) through (h), 
and Exchange Act rule 18a-7(j) as applied to these requirements 
pursuant to this Order;
    (3) With respect to the requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-
6(b)(1)(viii), the Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for 
the requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 
18a-1 through 18a-1d pursuant to this Order;
    (4) This Order does not extend to the requirements of Exchange Act 
rule 18a-6(b)(1)(viii)(L); and
    (5) This Order does not extend to the requirements of Exchange Act 
rule 18a-6(b)(1)(viii)(M) relating to Exchange Act rule 18a-2.
    (I) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-6(b)(1)(ix), provided 
that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of MiFID Org Reg articles 22(3)(c), 23, 24, 25(2), 26, 
29(2)(c), 35 and 72(1); CRR articles 176, 286 and 293(1)(d); EMIR RTS; 
EMIR article 9(2); MiFID articles 16(2), 16(3), 16(5), 24(9); MiFID 
Delegated Directive article 11; CRD article 73, 75-87; WpHG sections 64 
paragraph 3, 70, 80 paragraph 6, and 84; WpDVerOV section 6; and KWG 
sections 10a, 25a, 25c(3)(3), 25c(3)(4), 25c(4a), 25d(6), 25(8); and
    (2) The Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-
1 through 18a-1d pursuant to this Order;
    (J) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-6(b)(1)(x), provided 
that:

[[Page 59820]]

    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of EMIR article 9(2); MiFID Org Reg article 72(1); CRD 
article 73; MiFID article 16(6); KWG section 10a; and WpHG section 83 
paragraph 1; and
    (2) The Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-
1 through 18a-1d pursuant to this Order;
    (K) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-6(b)(1)(xii) or 
(b)(2)(vii), as applicable, regarding one or more provisions of 
Exchange Act rules 15Fh-3 or 15Fk-1 for which substituted compliance is 
available under this Order, provided that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of EMIR article 9(2); MLD4 articles 11 and 13; MiFID Org 
Reg article 72(1); MiFID article 16(6); GWG sections 10 and 11; and 
WpHG section 83 paragraph 1, in each case with respect to the relevant 
security-based swap or activity;
    (2) With respect to the portion of Exchange Act rule 18a-
6(b)(1)(xii) or (b)(2)(vii) that relates to one or more provisions of 
Exchange Act rule 15Fh-3 for which substituted compliance is available 
under this Order, the Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for 
such business conduct standard(s) of Exchange Act rule 15Fh-3 pursuant 
to this Order, as applicable, with respect to the relevant security-
based swap or activity; and
    (3) With respect to the portion of Exchange Act rule 18a-
6(b)(1)(xii) or (b)(2)(vii), as applicable, that relates to Exchange 
Act rule 15Fk-1, the Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for 
Exchange Act section 15F(k) and Exchange Act rule 15Fk-1 pursuant to 
this Order;
    (L) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-6(c), provided that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of MiFID Org Reg articles 21(1)(f) and 72(1); MiFID 
article 16(6); and WpHG section 83 paragraph 1; and
    (2) This Order does not extend to the requirements of Exchange act 
rule 18a-6(c) relating to Forms SBSE, SBSE-A, SBSE-C, SBSE-W, all 
amendments to these forms, and all other licenses or other 
documentation showing the registration of the Covered Entity with any 
securities regulatory authority or the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading 
Commission;
    (M) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-6(d)(1), provided 
that the Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of MiFID Org Reg articles 35 and 72(1); CRD articles 88, 
91(1), 91(8); MiFID article 9(1), 16(3), 16(6); KWG sections 25c(1) 
through (3), 25d(1) through (3), and 36; and WpHG sections 81(1), 83 
paragraph 1, and 84;
    (N) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-6(d)(2), provided 
that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of EMIR article 9(2); MiFID Org Reg articles 72(1) and 
72(3); MiFID article 16(6); and WpHG section 83 paragraph 1; and
    (2) With respect to the requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-
6(d)(2)(i), the Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-
1 through 18a-1d pursuant to this Order;
    (O) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-6(d)(3), provided 
that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of MiFID Org Reg articles 21(1)(f), 72, 73, and Annex I; 
MiFID article 16(6); and WpHG section 83 paragraph 1; and
    (2) With respect to the requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-
6(d)(3)(i), the Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-
1 through 18a-1d pursuant to this Order;
    (P) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-6(d)(4) and (d)(5), 
provided that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of EMIR article 9(2); MiFID Org Reg articles 24, 25(2), 
72(1) and 73; MiFID articles 16(2), 16(6), and 25(5); and WpHG sections 
64 paragraph 3 and 83 paragraphs 1 and 2; and
    (2) The Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for Exchange 
Act rules 15Fi-3, 15Fi-4, and 15Fi-5 pursuant to this Order;
    (Q) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-6(e), provided that 
the Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the requirements of 
MiFID Org Reg articles 21(2), 58, 72(1) and 72(3); MiFID articles 
16(5), 16(6); and WpHG sections 80 paragraph 6, and 83 paragraph 1; and
    (R) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-6(f), provided that 
the Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the requirements of 
MiFID Org Reg article 31(1); MiFID article 16(5); and WpHG section 80 
paragraph 6.
    (ii) Paragraph (f)(2)(i) is subject to the following further 
conditions:
    (A) A Covered Entity may apply the substituted compliance 
determination in paragraph (f)(2)(i)(K) to records related to Exchange 
Act rule 15Fh-3(b), (c), (e), (f) and (g) in respect of one or more 
security-based swaps or activities related to security-based swaps; and
    (B) This Order does not extend to the requirements of Exchange Act 
rule 18a-6(b)(1)(xi), (b)(1)(xiii), (b)(2)(v), (b)(2)(vi), or 
(b)(2)(viii).
    (3) File Reports. The requirements of the following provisions of 
Exchange Act rule 18a-7, provided that the Covered Entity complies with 
the relevant conditions in this paragraph (f)(3):
    (i) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-7(a)(1) or (a)(2), as 
applicable, and the requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-7(j) as 
applied to the requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-7(a)(1) or (a)(2), 
as applicable, provided that:
    (A) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of CRR articles 99, 394, 430 and Part Six: Title II and 
Title III; CRR Reporting ITS annexes I, II, III, IV, V, VIII, IX, X, 
XI, XII and XIII, as applicable;
    (B) The Covered Entity files periodic unaudited financial and 
operational information with the Commission or its designee in the 
manner and format required by Commission rule or order and presents the 
financial information in the filing in accordance with generally 
accepted accounting principles that the Covered Entity uses to prepare 
general purpose publicly available or available to be issued financial 
statements in Germany;
    (C) With respect to the requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-
7(a)(1), the Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-
1 through 18a-1d pursuant to this Order; and
    (D) With respect to the requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-
7(a)(1), the Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-6(b)(1)(viii) pursuant to this 
Order;
    (ii) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-7(a)(3) and the 
requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-7(j) as applied to the 
requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-7(a)(3), provided that:
    (A) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of CRR articles 99, 394, 431, 433,452, 454, and 455; CRR 
Reporting ITS annexes I, II, VIII and IX, as applicable; and
    (B) The Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-
1 through 18a-1d pursuant to this Order;
    (iii) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-7(b), provided 
that:
    (A) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of

[[Page 59821]]

CRR articles 431 through 455; and HGB sections 316 and 325; and
    (B) The Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-6(b)(1)(viii) pursuant to this 
Order.
    (iv) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-7(c), (d), (e), (f), 
(g) and (h) and the requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-7(j) as 
applied to the requirements of paragraphs (c), (d), (e), (f), (g) and 
(h) of Exchange Act rule 18a-7, provided that:
    (A) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of CRR articles 26(2), 132(5), 154, 191, 321, 325bi, 350, 
353, 368, 418; HGB sections 316 and 325; WpHG section 24 and 84, and 89 
(1) sentence 1 no. 1; and KWG section 26a(1);
    (B) With respect to financial statements the Covered Entity is 
required to file annually with the German BaFin, including a report of 
an independent public accountant covering the financial statements, the 
Covered Entity:
    (1) Simultaneously sends a copy of such annual financial statements 
and the report of the independent public accountant covering the annual 
financial statements to the Commission in the manner specified on the 
Commission's website;
    (2) Includes with the transmission the contact information of an 
individual who can provide further information about the financial 
statements and report;
    (3) Includes with the transmission the report of an independent 
public accountant required by Exchange Act rule 18a-7(c)(1)(i)(C) 
covering the annual financial statements if German laws do not require 
the Covered Entity to engage an independent public accountant to 
prepare a report covering the annual financial statements; provided, 
however, that such report of the independent public accountant may be 
prepared in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards in 
Germany that the independent public accountant uses to perform audit 
and attestation services and the accountant complies with German 
independence requirements;
    (4) Includes with the transmission the reports required by Exchange 
Act rule 18a-7(c)(1)(i)(B) and (C) addressing the statements identified 
in Exchange Act rule 18a-7(c)(3) or (c)(4), as applicable, that relate 
to Exchange Act rule 18a-4; provided, however, that the report of the 
independent public accountant required by Exchange Act rule 18a-
7(c)(1)(i)(C) may be prepared in accordance with generally accepted 
auditing standards in Germany that the independent public accountant 
uses to perform audit and attestation services and the accountant 
complies with German independence requirements; and
    (5) Includes with the transmission the supporting schedules and 
reconciliations, as applicable, required by Exchange Act rules 18a-
7(c)(2)(ii) and (iii), respectively, relating to Exchange Act rule 18a-
2; and
    (6) Includes with the transmission the supporting schedules and 
reconciliations, as applicable, required by Exchange Act rules 18a-
7(c)(2)(ii) and (iii), respectively, relating to Exchange Act rules 
18a-4 and 18a-4a;
    (C) The Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-
1 through 18a-1d pursuant to this Order; and
    (D) The Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-6(b)(1)(viii) pursuant to this 
Order.
    (4)(i) Provide Notification. The requirements of the following 
provisions of Exchange Act rule 18a-8, provided that the Covered Entity 
complies with the relevant conditions in this paragraph (f)(4)(i) and 
with the applicable conditions in paragraph (f)(4)(ii):
    (A) The requirements of paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (a)(1)(ii), (b)(1), 
(b)(2), and (b)(4) of Exchange Act rule 18a-8 and the requirements of 
Exchange Act rule 18a-8(h) as applied to the requirements of paragraphs 
(a)(1)(i), (a)(1)(ii), (b)(1), (b)(2), and (b)(4) of Exchange Act rule 
18a-8, provided that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of CRR article 366(5); KWG section 25a (1) sentence 6 no. 
3; and FinDAG section 4d; and
    (2) The Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-
1 through 18a-1d pursuant to this Order;
    (B) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-8(c) and the 
requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-8(h) as applied to the 
requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-8(c), provided that the Covered 
Entity is subject to and complies with the requirements of KWG section 
25a(1) sentence 6 no. 3; and FinDAG section 4d;
    (C) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-8(d) and the 
requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-8(h) as applied to the 
requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-8(d), provided that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of KWG section 25a(1) sentence 6 no. 3; and FinDAG section 
4d; and
    (2) This Order does not extend to the requirements of Exchange Act 
rule 18a-8(d) to give notice with respect to books and records required 
by Exchange Act rule 18a-5 for which the Covered Entity does not apply 
substituted compliance pursuant to this Order;
    (D) The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-8(e) and the 
requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-8(h) as applied to the 
requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-8(e), provided that:
    (1) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of KWG section 25a(1) sentence 6 no. 3; and FinDAG section 
4d;
    (2) The Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-
1 through 18a-1d pursuant to this Order;
    (3) This Order does not extend to the requirements of Exchange act 
rule 18a-8(e) relating to Exchange Act rule 18a-2 or to the 
requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-8(h) as applied to the 
requirements of Exchange act rule 18a-8(e) relating to Exchange Act 
rule 18a-2; and
    (4) This Order does not extend to the requirements of Exchange act 
rule 18a-8(e) relating to Exchange Act rule 18a-4 or to the 
requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-8(h) as applied to the 
requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-8(e) relating to Exchange Act 
rule 18a-4;
    (ii) Paragraph (f)(4)(i) is subject to the following further 
conditions:
    (A) The Covered Entity:
    (1) Simultaneously sends a copy of any notice required to be sent 
by German law cited in this paragraph of the Order to the Commission in 
the manner specified on the Commission's website; and
    (2) Includes with the transmission the contact information of an 
individual who can provide further information about the matter that is 
the subject of the notice;
    (B) This Order does not extend to the requirements of paragraphs 
(a)(2) and (b)(3) of Exchange Act rule 18a-8 relating to Exchange Act 
rule 18a-2 or to the requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-8(h) as 
applied to the requirements of paragraphs (a)(2) and (b)(3) of Exchange 
Act rule 18a-8 relating to Exchange Act rule 18a-2;
    (C) This Order does not extend to the requirements of paragraph (g) 
of Exchange Act rule 18a-8 or to the requirements of Exchange Act rule 
18a-8(h) as applied to the requirements of paragraph (g) of rule 18a-8.

[[Page 59822]]

    (5) Securities Counts. The requirements of Exchange Act rule 18a-9, 
provided that:
    (i) The Covered Entity is subject to and complies with the 
requirements of EMIR article 11(1)(b); EMIR RTS articles 12 and 13; 
WpHG section 84; HGB sections 316 and 325; and WpHG section 89 (1) 
sentence 1 no. 1; and
    (ii) The Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for the 
requirements of Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-
1 through 18a-1d pursuant to this Order.
    (6) Daily Trading Records. The requirements of Exchange Act section 
15F(g), provided that the Covered Entity is subject to and complies 
with the requirements of WpHG section 83 paragraph 1; and MiFID Org Reg 
article 21(1)(f), 21(4), and 72(1).
    (7) Examination and Production of Records. Notwithstanding the 
forgoing provisions of paragraph (f) of this Order, this Order does not 
extend to, and Covered Entities remain subject to, the requirement of 
Exchange Act section 15F(f) to keep books and records open to 
inspection by any representative of the Commission and the requirement 
of Exchange Act rule 18a-6(g) to furnish promptly to a representative 
of the Commission legible, true, complete, and current copies of those 
records of the Covered Entity that are required to be preserved under 
Exchange Act rule 18a-6, or any other records of the Covered Entity 
that are subject to examination or required to be made or maintained 
pursuant to Exchange Act section 15F that are requested by a 
representative of the Commission.
    (8) English Translations. Notwithstanding the forgoing provisions 
of paragraph (f) of this Order, to the extent documents are not 
prepared in the English language, Covered Entities must promptly 
furnish to a representative of the Commission upon request an English 
translation of any record, report, or notification of the Covered 
Entity that is required to be made, preserved, filed, or subject to 
examination pursuant to Exchange Act section 15F of this Order.
    (g) Definitions.
    (1) ``Covered Entity'' means an entity that:
    (i) Is a security-based swap dealer or major security-based swap 
participant registered with the Commission;
    (ii) Is not a ``U.S. person,'' as that term is defined in rule 
3a71-3(a)(4) under the Exchange Act; and
    (iii) Is an investment firm and/or credit institution that is 
authorized by BaFin to provide investment services or perform 
investment activities in Germany and is supervised by the ECB (or has a 
licensing application pending with the ECB as of August 12, 2021) as a 
significant institution.
    (2) ``MiFID'' means the ``Markets in Financial Instruments 
Directive,'' Directive 2014/65/EU, as amended from time to time.
    (3) ``WpHG'' means Germany's ``Wertpapierhandelsgesetz'', as 
amended or superseded from time to time.
    (4) ``MiFID Org Reg'' means Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 
2017/565, as amended from time to time.
    (5) ``MiFID Delegated Directive'' means Commission Delegated 
Directive (EU) 2017/593, as amended from time to time.
    (6) ``MLD'' means Directive (EU) 2015/849, as amended from time to 
time.
    (7) ``GwG'' means Germany's ``Geldw[auml]schegesetz,'' as amended 
from time to time.
    (8) ``MiFIR'' means Regulation (EU) 600/2014, as amended from time 
to time.
    (9) ``EMIR'' means the ``European Market Infrastructure 
Regulation,'' Regulation (EU) 648/2012, as amended from time to time.
    (10) ``EMIR RTS'' means Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 149/
2013, as amended from time to time.
    (11) ``EMIR Margin RTS'' means Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 
2016/2251, as amended from time to time.
    (12) ``CRR Reporting ITS'' means Commission Implementing Regulation 
(EU) 680/2014, as amended from time to time.
    (13) ``CRD'' means Directive 2013/36/EU, as amended from time to 
time.
    (14) ``KWG'' means Germany's ``Kreditwesengesetz,'' as amended from 
time to time.
    (15) ``CRR'' means Regulation (EU) 575/2013, as amended from time 
to time.
    (16) ``MAR'' means the ``Market Abuse Regulation,'' Regulation (EU) 
596/2014, as amended from time to time.
    (17) ``MAR Investment Recommendations Regulation'' means Commission 
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/958, as amended from time to time.
    (18) ``FinDAG'' means Germany's 
``Finanzdienstleistungsaufsichtsgesetz,'' as amended from time to time.
    (19) ``BaFin'' means the Bundesanstalt f[uuml]r 
Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht.
    (20) ``ECB'' means the European Central Bank.
    (21) ``WpDVerOV'' means Germany's ``Wertpapierdienstleistungs-
Verhaltens- und -Organisationsverordnung,'' as amended from time to 
time.
    (22) ``SAG'' means Germany's ``Sanierungs- und Abwicklungsgesetz,'' 
as amended from time to time.
    (23) ``SolvV'' means Germany's ``Solvabilit[auml]tsverordnung,'' as 
amended from time to time.
    (24) ``BRRD'' means Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive 2014/59/
EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014, as 
amended from time to time.
    It is hereby further determined and ordered pursuant to rule 3a71-6 
under the Exchange Act, that the paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of the Order 
Granting Conditional Substituted Compliance in Connection With Certain 
Requirements Applicable to Non-U.S. Security-Based Swap Dealers and 
Major Security-Based Swap Participants Subject to Regulation in the 
French Republic issued by the Commission (Exchange Act Release No. 
92484, 86 FR 41612) (``French Substituted Compliance Order'') is 
amended and replaced with the following:
    (iii)(A) The Covered Entity:
    (1) Maintains liquid assets as defined in paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(B) 
that have an aggregate market value that exceeds the amount of the 
Covered Entity's adjusted liabilities as defined in paragraph 
(c)(1)(iii)(C) by at least $100 million before applying the deduction 
specified in paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(D) and by at least $20 million after 
applying the deduction specified in paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(D);
    (2) Makes and preserves for three years a quarterly record that:
    (a) Identifies and values the liquid assets maintained pursuant to 
paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A)(1);
    (b) Compares the amount of the aggregate value the liquid assets 
maintained pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A)(1) to the amount of the 
Covered Entity's total liabilities and shows the amount of the 
difference between the two amounts (``the excess liquid assets 
amount''); and
    (c) Shows the amount of the deduction specified in paragraph 
(c)(1)(iii)(D) and the amount that deduction reduces the excess liquid 
assets amount;
    (3) The Covered Entity notifies the Commission in writing within 24 
hours in the manner specified on the Commission's website if the 
Covered Entity fails to meet the requirements of paragraph 
(c)(iii)(A)(1) and includes in the notice the contact information of an 
individual who can provide further information about the failure to 
meet the requirements; and
    (4) Includes its most recent statement of financial condition filed 
with its local supervisor (whether audited or unaudited) with its 
initial written notice

[[Page 59823]]

to the Commission of its intent to rely on substituted compliance under 
condition (a)(9) above.
    (B) For the purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A)(1), liquid assets 
are:
    (1) Cash and cash equivalents;
    (2) Collateralized agreements;
    (3) Customer and other trading related receivables;
    (4) Trading and financial assets; and
    (5) Initial margin posted by the Covered Entity to a counterparty 
or a third-party custodian, provided:
    (a) The initial margin requirement is funded by a fully executed 
written loan agreement with an affiliate of the Covered Entity;
    (b) The loan agreement provides that the lender waives re-payment 
of the loan until the initial margin is returned to the Covered Entity; 
and
    (c) The liability of the Covered Entity to the lender can be fully 
satisfied by delivering the collateral serving as initial margin to the 
lender.
    (C) For the purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A)(1), adjusted 
liabilities are the Covered Entity's total liabilities, excluding 
subordinated debt issued by the Covered Entity that qualifies as Tier 2 
capital pursuant to the capital requirements identified in paragraph 
(c)(1)(i).
    (D) The deduction required by paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A) is the 
amount of the Covered Entity's risk-weighted assets, excluding risk-
weighted assets that are included in CRR Part Three, Title III (Own 
Funds Requirements for Operational Risk) and risk-weighted assets that 
are not treated as liquid assets for the purposes of paragraph 
(c)(1)(iii)(A)(1), calculated for the purposes of the capital 
requirements identified in paragraph (c)(1)(i) divided by 12.5.
    It is hereby further determined and ordered pursuant to rule 3a71-6 
under the Exchange Act, that the paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of the Order 
Granting Conditional Substituted Compliance in Connection With Certain 
Requirements Applicable to Non-U.S. Security-Based Swap Dealers and 
Major Security-Based Swap Participants Subject to Regulation in the 
United Kingdom (Exchange Act Release No. 92529, 86 FR 43318) (``UK 
Substituted Compliance Order'') is amended and replaced with the 
following:
    (iii)(A) The Covered Entity:
    (1) Maintains liquid assets as defined in paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(B) 
that have an aggregate market value that exceeds the amount of the 
Covered Entity's adjusted liabilities as defined in paragraph 
(c)(1)(iii)(C) by at least $100 million before applying the deduction 
specified in paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(D) and by at least $20 million after 
applying the deduction specified in paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(D);
    (2) Makes and preserves for three years a quarterly record that:
    (a) Identifies and values the liquid assets maintained pursuant to 
paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A)(1);
    (b) Compares the amount of the aggregate value the liquid assets 
maintained pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A)(1) to the amount of the 
Covered Entity's total liabilities and shows the amount of the 
difference between the two amounts (``the excess liquid assets 
amount''); and
    (c) Shows the amount of the deduction specified in paragraph 
(c)(1)(iii)(D) and the amount that deduction reduces the excess liquid 
assets amount;
    (3) The Covered Entity notifies the Commission in writing within 24 
hours in the manner specified on the Commission's website if the 
Covered Entity fails to meet the requirements of paragraph 
(c)(iii)(A)(1) and includes in the notice the contact information of an 
individual who can provide further information about the failure to 
meet the requirements; and
    (4) Includes its most recent statement of financial condition filed 
with its local supervisor (whether audited or unaudited) with its 
initial written notice to the Commission of its intent to rely on 
substituted compliance under condition (a)(9) above.
    (B) For the purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A)(1), liquid assets 
are:
    (1) Cash and cash equivalents;
    (2) Collateralized agreements;
    (3) Customer and other trading related receivables;
    (4) Trading and financial assets; and
    (5) Initial margin posted by the Covered Entity to a counterparty 
or a third-party custodian, provided:
    (a) The initial margin requirement is funded by a fully executed 
written loan agreement with an affiliate of the Covered Entity;
    (b) The loan agreement provides that the lender waives re-payment 
of the loan until the initial margin is returned to the Covered Entity; 
and
    (c) The liability of the Covered Entity to the lender can be fully 
satisfied by delivering the collateral serving as initial margin to the 
lender.
    (C) For the purposes of paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A)(1), adjusted 
liabilities are the Covered Entity's total liabilities, excluding 
subordinated debt issued by the Covered Entity that qualifies as Tier 2 
capital pursuant to the capital requirements identified in paragraph 
(c)(1)(i).
    (D) The deduction required by paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A) is the 
amount of the Covered Entity's risk-weighted assets, excluding risk-
weighted assets that are included in CRR Part Three, Title III (Own 
Funds Requirements for Operational Risk) and risk-weighted assets that 
are not treated as liquid assets for the purposes of paragraph 
(c)(1)(iii)(A)(1), calculated for the purposes of the capital 
requirements identified in paragraph (c)(1)(i) divided by 12.5.
    It is hereby further determined and ordered pursuant to rule 3a71-6 
under the Exchange Act, that the paragraph (a)(5) of the French 
Substituted Compliance Order is amended and replaced with the 
following:
    (5) Counterparties as EMIR ``counterparties.'' For each condition 
in paragraphs (b) through (f) of this Order that requires the 
application of, and the Covered Entity's compliance with, provisions of 
EMIR, EMIR RTS, EMIR Margin RTS and/or other EU requirements adopted 
pursuant to those provisions, if the relevant provision applies only to 
the Covered Entity's activities with specified types of counterparties, 
and if the counterparty to the Covered Entity is not any of the 
specified types of counterparty, the Covered Entity complies with the 
applicable condition of this Order:
    (i) As if the counterparty were the specified type of counterparty; 
in this regard, if the Covered Entity reasonably determines that the 
counterparty would be a financial counterparty if it were established 
in the EU and authorized by an appropriate EU authority, it must treat 
the counterparty as if the counterparty were a financial counterparty;
    (ii) Without regard to the application of EMIR article 13; and
    (iii) Only to the extent that an Exchange Act section or rule cited 
in paragraphs (b) through (f) of this Order applies to the security-
based swap activities with that counterparty.
    It is hereby further determined and ordered pursuant to rule 3a71-6 
under the Exchange Act, that the paragraph (a)(6) of the French 
Substituted Compliance Order is amended and replaced with the 
following:
    (6) Security-based swap status under EMIR. For each condition in 
paragraphs (b) through (f) of this Order that requires the application 
of, and the Covered Entity's compliance with, provisions of EMIR, EMIR 
RTS, EMIR Margin RTS, and/or other EU requirements adopted pursuant to 
those provisions, if the relevant provision applies to the Covered 
Entity's OTC derivatives or OTC derivative contracts that have not been 
cleared by a central counterparty, then either:

[[Page 59824]]

    (i) The relevant security-based swap is an ``OTC derivative'' or 
``OTC derivative contract,'' as defined in EMIR article 2(7), that has 
not been cleared by a central counterparty and otherwise is subject to 
the provisions of EMIR article 11, EMIR RTS articles 11-15, and EMIR 
Margin RTS article 2; or
    (ii) The relevant security-based swap has been cleared by a central 
counterparty that is authorized or recognized to clear derivatives 
contracts by a relevant authority in the EU.
    It is hereby further determined and ordered pursuant to rule 3a71-6 
under the Exchange Act, that the paragraph (f)(1)(i)(M)(2) of the 
French Substituted Compliance Order is amended and replaced with the 
following:
    (2) With respect to the portion of Exchange Act rule 18a-5(a)(17) 
and (b)(13) that relates to one or more provisions of Exchange Act rule 
15Fh-3 for which substituted compliance is available under this Order, 
the Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for such business 
conduct standard(s) of Exchange Act rule 15Fh-3 pursuant to this Order, 
as applicable, with respect to the relevant security-based swap or 
activity; and
    It is hereby further determined and ordered pursuant to rule 3a71-6 
under the Exchange Act, that the paragraph (f)(2)(i)(K)(2) of the 
French Substituted Compliance Order is amended and replaced with the 
following:
    (2) With respect to the portion of Exchange Act rule 18a-
6(b)(1)(xii) or (b)(2)(vii) that relates to one or more provisions of 
Exchange Act rule 15Fh-3 for which substituted compliance is available 
under this Order, the Covered Entity applies substituted compliance for 
such business conduct standard(s) of Exchange Act rule 15Fh-3 pursuant 
to this Order, as applicable, with respect to the relevant security-
based swap or activity; and
    It is hereby further determined and ordered pursuant to rule 3a71-6 
under the Exchange Act, that the paragraph (a)(13) of the UK 
Substituted Compliance Order is amended and replaced with the 
following:
    (13) Covered Entity's counterparties as UK EMIR ``counterparties.'' 
For each condition in paragraphs (b) through (f) of this Order that 
requires the application of, and the Covered Entity's compliance with, 
provisions of UK EMIR, UK EMIR RTS, UK EMIR Margin RTS, and/or other UK 
requirements adopted pursuant to those provisions, if the relevant 
provision applies only to the Covered Entity's activities with 
specified types of counterparties, and if the counterparty to the 
Covered Entity is not any of the specified types of counterparty, the 
Covered Entity complies with the applicable condition of this Order:
    (i) As if the counterparty were the specified type of counterparty; 
in this regard, if the Covered Entity reasonably determines that the 
counterparty would be a financial counterparty if it were established 
in the UK and authorized by an appropriate UK authority, it must treat 
the counterparty as if the counterparty were a financial counterparty;
    (ii) Without regard to the application of UK EMIR article 13; and
    (iii) Only to the extent that an Exchange Act section or rule cited 
in paragraphs (b) through (f) of this Order applies to the security-
based swap activities with that counterparty.
    It is hereby further determined and ordered pursuant to rule 3a71-6 
under the Exchange Act, that a security-based swap dealer applying 
substituted compliance with respect to the capital requirements of 
Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-1, and 18a-1a 
through d has until January 1, 2022 to meet (as applicable):
    a. The additional capital condition in paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of the 
Amended and Restated Order Granting Conditional Substituted Compliance 
in Connection with Certain Requirements Applicable to Non-U.S. 
Security-Based Swap Dealers and Major Security-Based Swap Participants 
Subject to Regulation in the Federal Republic of Germany (Exchange Act 
Release No. 35-93411) (``German Amended Order'');
    b. The additional capital condition in paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of the 
French Substituted Compliance Order; or
    c. The additional capital condition in paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of the 
UK Substituted Compliance Order.
    It is hereby further determined and ordered pursuant to rule 3a71-6 
under the Exchange Act, that a security-based swap dealer applying 
substituted compliance with respect to the margin requirements of 
Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rule 18a-3 has until 
January 1, 2022 to meet (as applicable):
    a. The additional margin conditions in paragraphs (c)(1)(ii) and 
(iii) of the German Amended Order;
    b. The additional margin conditions in paragraphs (c)(1)(ii) and 
(iii) of the French Substituted Compliance Order; or
    c. The additional margin conditions in paragraphs (c)(1)(ii) and 
(iii) of the UK Substituted Compliance Order.
    It is further determined and ordered that the compliance date for 
Exchange Act section 15F(e) and Exchange Act rules 18a-1, and 18a-1a 
through d is January 1, 2022 for a security-based swap dealer with a 
principal place of business in Germany that is operating pursuant to a 
waiver under CRR, Article 7 (Derogation from the application of 
prudential requirements on an individual basis).

    By the Commission.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-23445 Filed 10-27-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P