Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4954
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2012-02-21T05:00Z

From:	Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US
To:	John Schakenbach/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Cc:	Gabrielle Stevens/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:	02/07/2012 12:41 PM
Subject:	Emails in relation to EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

John -- second set of emails for the docket

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.
USEPA (6204J)
Clean Air Markets Division
haeuber.richard@epa.gov
202-343-9250
http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets
http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets
----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From:	"Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
To:	Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Cc:	Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:	01/26/2012 09:27 AM
Subject:	RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Thanks, Jeb.  We'll forward to reviewers. 

On the changes since proposal, it would be great to get something like the Excel summary table we got at NPRM.  You have something similar in the TSD, but if EPA could add the CSAPR final rule budgets for the states in both the FR and DFR as well as the NPRM amendment budgets as well for the FR so that we can see the incremental changes relative to both CSAPR FR and the NPRM, that'd be great. 

Have a great day,
Christine 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeb Stenhouse [mailto:Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 5:17 PM
To: Kymn, Christine J.
Cc: Richard Haeuber
Subject: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Hi Christine,

Per our discussion at today's meeting, I've attached the comment letters related to each of the post-proposal changes explained in the preamble to the final revisions rule.  For each letter, I've identified the relevant pages of the preamble that explain the change.

Pages 14-15 of the preamble (See attached file:
EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4822.pdf)

Page 22 of the preamble (See attached file:
EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4803.pdf)

Pages 29-31 of the preamble (See attached file:
EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4792.pdf)(See attached file:
EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4863.pdf)

Sincerely,
Jeb Stenhouse
Chief, Program Development Branch
Clean Air Markets Division
Environmental Protection Agency
202-343-9781
stenhouse.jeb@epa.gov

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From:	"Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
To:	Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:	02/01/2012 03:13 PM
Subject:	EO 13563 12866 Interagency Comments 2 CSAPR Amendment rules

Rick and Jeb,
 
Attached please find interagency comments for the 2 CSAPR rules.  
 
Speak with you soon,
Christine EO1356312866Interagencycomments1_CSAPR_RevisionsI_2060-AR22.doc  EO1356312866Interagencycomments2_CSAPR_Revisions_Part_II_2060-AR35.doc  EO1356312866Interagencycomments3 Final Revisions Rule Significant Contribution Assessment TSD.doc  
----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From:	"Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
To:	Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:	02/01/2012 02:08 PM
Subject:	FW: EO 13563 12866 Interagency Comments 2 CSAPR Amendment rules

 
Second try
From: Kymn, Christine J. 
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 12:13 PM
To: Richard Haeuber (Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov); Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov
Subject: EO 13563 12866 Interagency Comments 2 CSAPR Amendment rules 
 
Rick and Jeb,
 
Attached please find interagency comments for the 2 CSAPR rules.  
 
Speak with you soon,
Christine EO1356312866Interagencycomments1_CSAPR_RevisionsI_2060-AR22.doc  EO1356312866Interagencycomments2_CSAPR_Revisions_Part_II_2060-AR35.doc  EO1356312866Interagencycomments3 Final Revisions Rule Significant Contribution Assessment TSD.doc  
----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From:	"Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
To:	Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Cc:	Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:	02/01/2012 02:58 PM
Subject:	RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Hi Rick,
Yes still on.  For tomorrow's call are your folks at all available before 1pm?  1:30-230 doesn't work.
Thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:07 AM
To: Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov
Cc: Kymn, Christine J.; Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov
Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Christine -- just wanted to double-check and confirm that we are on for
4 PM today.

Thanks

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.
USEPA (6204J)
Clean Air Markets Division
haeuber.richard@epa.gov
202-343-9250
http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets
http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

From:		 Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US
To:		 "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
Cc:		 Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:		 01/31/2012 05:48 PM
Subject:		 RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR
            revisions rule

Christine --- talking with here, 4 PM works best for us. So, the call-in number and passcode are:

866-299-3188
202-343-9250

Let me know if anything changes.

Look forward to talking with you

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.
USEPA (6204J)
Clean Air Markets Division
haeuber.richard@epa.gov
202-343-9250
http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets
http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From:	"Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
To:	Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Cc:	Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:	02/01/2012 03:49 PM
Subject:	RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

OK - the ask was for before 1pm actually

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 3:10 PM
To: Kymn, Christine J.
Cc: Jeb Stenhouse
Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Christine -- not sure about 1 PM tomorrow for the relevant folks. They will be on the call -- can we poll them at that point and adjust the schedule for tomorrow accordingly?

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.
USEPA (6204J)
Clean Air Markets Division
haeuber.richard@epa.gov
202-343-9250
http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets
http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From:	"Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
To:	Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Cc:	Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:	02/01/2012 06:21 PM
Subject:	RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

I've put a feeler out and will let EPA know as soon as I hear. I'm not sure that Jeb needs to be on the line, so long as someone from OGC is on.    Feel bad enough about obliging him to today's call!
Thanks,
Christine

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 5:50 PM
To: Kymn, Christine J.
Cc: Jeb Stenhouse
Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Christine --- How about 11-12 tomorrow? I've sent a scheduler to folks here, though I believe I have a conflict and Jeb will lead for us.

Same call-in numbers

866-299-3188
202-343-9250

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.
USEPA (6204J)
Clean Air Markets Division
haeuber.richard@epa.gov
202-343-9250
http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets
http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From:	"Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
To:	Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Cc:	Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:	02/02/2012 02:01 PM
Subject:	RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Hi Rick 
Just left you a vm.  Can't do now ...

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 1:49 PM
To: Kymn, Christine J.
Cc: Jeb Stenhouse
Subject: Re: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

In case you all can call in, here's a number

Sorry I didn't include call-in info initially -- we'll use  866-299-3188; code 202-343-9193 Richard Haeuber Sent by EPA Wireless E-Mail Services

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kymn, Christine J." [Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov]
Sent: 02/02/2012 02:23 PM GMT
To: Richard Haeuber
Cc: Jeb Stenhouse
Subject: Re: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Rick and Jeb,
Looks like we're on for 11am. Do you have a call-in or shall we get one?
Thx!
Christine

----- Original Message -----
From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 09:08 AM
To: Kymn, Christine J.
Cc: Jeb Stenhouse <Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov>
Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Good morning --- any word on whether 11 AM will work?

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.
USEPA (6204J)
Clean Air Markets Division
haeuber.richard@epa.gov
202-343-9250
http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets
http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

From:		 "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
To:		 Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Cc:		 Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:		 02/01/2012 06:21 PM
Subject:		 RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR
            revisions rule

I've put a feeler out and will let EPA know as soon as I hear. I'm not sure that Jeb needs to be on the line, so long as someone from OGC is
on.    Feel bad enough about obliging him to today's call!
Thanks,
Christine

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 5:50 PM
To: Kymn, Christine J.
Cc: Jeb Stenhouse
Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Christine --- How about 11-12 tomorrow? I've sent a scheduler to folks here, though I believe I have a conflict and Jeb will lead for us.

Same call-in numbers

866-299-3188
202-343-9250

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.
USEPA (6204J)
Clean Air Markets Division
haeuber.richard@epa.gov
202-343-9250
http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets
http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From:	"Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
To:	Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Cc:	Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:	02/02/2012 03:34 PM
Subject:	Re: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Hi Rick,
Am on a call through 430 or 5. do you want to try to touch base around then?

----- Original Message -----
From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 01:49 PM
To: Kymn, Christine J.
Cc: Jeb Stenhouse <Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov>
Subject: Re: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

In case you all can call in, here's a number

Sorry I didn't include call-in info initially -- we'll use  866-299-3188; code 202-343-9193
Richard Haeuber
Sent by EPA Wireless E-Mail Services

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kymn, Christine J." [Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov]
Sent: 02/02/2012 02:23 PM GMT
To: Richard Haeuber
Cc: Jeb Stenhouse
Subject: Re: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Rick and Jeb,
Looks like we're on for 11am. Do you have a call-in or shall we get one?
Thx!
Christine

----- Original Message -----
From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 09:08 AM
To: Kymn, Christine J.
Cc: Jeb Stenhouse <Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov>
Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Good morning --- any word on whether 11 AM will work?

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.
USEPA (6204J)
Clean Air Markets Division
haeuber.richard@epa.gov
202-343-9250
http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets
http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

From:		 "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
To:		 Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Cc:		 Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:		 02/01/2012 06:21 PM
Subject:		 RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR
            revisions rule

I've put a feeler out and will let EPA know as soon as I hear. I'm not
sure that Jeb needs to be on the line, so long as someone from OGC is
on.    Feel bad enough about obliging him to today's call!
Thanks,
Christine

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 5:50 PM
To: Kymn, Christine J.
Cc: Jeb Stenhouse
Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR
revisions rule

Christine --- How about 11-12 tomorrow? I've sent a scheduler to folks
here, though I believe I have a conflict and Jeb will lead for us.

Same call-in numbers

866-299-3188
202-343-9250

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.
USEPA (6204J)
Clean Air Markets Division
haeuber.richard@epa.gov
202-343-9250
http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets
http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From:	"Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
To:	Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Cc:	Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:	02/03/2012 01:02 PM
Subject:	Re: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Rick,
We have a few follow up interagency comments. Pretty benign. I will forward very shortly.
Thanks,
Christine

----- Original Message -----
From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 11:50 AM
To: Kymn, Christine J.
Cc: Jeb Stenhouse <Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov>
Subject: Re: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Christine -- as we discussed, this got lost in the shuffle of the other
conversation. Sorry about that. Attached are the comments you requested.

(See attached file: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4784-A1.pdf)(See attached file:
EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4782-A1.pdf)(See attached file:
EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4752-A1.pdf)(See attached file:
EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4752-A4.pdf)(See attached file:
EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4752-A2.pdf)(See attached file:
EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4752-A3.pdf)(See attached file:
EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4818-A3.pdf)(See attached file:
EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4818-A1.pdf)(See attached file:
EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4818-A2.pdf)(See attached file:
EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4800-A1.pdf)(See attached file:
EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4755-A1.pdf)(See attached file:
EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4822-A1.pdf)

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.
USEPA (6204J)
Clean Air Markets Division
haeuber.richard@epa.gov
202-343-9250
http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets
http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets
----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From:	"Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
To:	Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Cc:	Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:	02/03/2012 01:32 PM
Subject:	EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Rick and Jeb,
Some additional comments on the rulemaking.  These comments and page references are based on the original draft.  Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Christine
BB: 202.631.6551

EO1356312866Interagencycomments4_CSAPR_RevisionsI_2060-AR22.doc.docx  
----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From:	"Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
To:	Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Cc:	Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:	02/03/2012 01:35 PM
Subject:	RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Apologies. Disregard this email.  These are for a different rule!

-----Original Message-----
From: Kymn, Christine J. 
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 1:32 PM
To: 'Richard Haeuber'
Cc: Jeb Stenhouse
Subject: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Rick and Jeb,
Some additional comments on the rulemaking.  These comments and page references are based on the original draft.  Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Christine
BB: 202.631.6551

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From:	"Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
To:	Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:	02/03/2012 01:44 PM
Subject:	RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Many apologies.  They'll notice as soon as they open the file.  Lotta balls in the air today. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 1:37 PM
To: Kymn, Christine J.
Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

already sent them....I'll call off the troops

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.
USEPA (6204J)
Clean Air Markets Division
haeuber.richard@epa.gov
202-343-9250
http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets
http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From:	"Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
To:	Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Cc:	Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:	02/03/2012 02:18 PM
Subject:	Re: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

No additional comments thus far. Just what we have on the plate currently. Sorry again for any confusion!

----- Original Message -----
From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 02:02 PM
To: Kymn, Christine J.
Cc: Jeb Stenhouse <Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov>
Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

that's what we figured -- and, yes, folks noticed quickly, resulting in
several quizzical emails

so, does this mean there were no additional comments? Or, should I still
anticipate an email from you?

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.
USEPA (6204J)
Clean Air Markets Division
haeuber.richard@epa.gov
202-343-9250
http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets
http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

From:		 "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
To:		 Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:		 02/03/2012 01:44 PM
Subject:		 RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment
            Final Rule

Many apologies.  They'll notice as soon as they open the file.  Lotta
balls in the air today.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 1:37 PM
To: Kymn, Christine J.
Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final
Rule

already sent them....I'll call off the troops

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.
USEPA (6204J)
Clean Air Markets Division
haeuber.richard@epa.gov
202-343-9250
http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets
http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From:	"Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
To:	Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Cc:	Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:	02/03/2012 02:56 PM
Subject:	RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Thanks, Rick. I will pass EPA's one pager along.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 2:44 PM
To: Kymn, Christine J.
Cc: Jeb Stenhouse
Subject: Re: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Christine --- thanks for the clarification about the comments you sent inadvertently. I've attached a one-pager that provides some helpful detail on the changes to the budget for one state. I'll send another email in a little bit that provides some information on some of the assumptions we discussed recently.

Hope this helps

(See attached file: CSAPR Rev Rule TX SO2 Changes.docx)

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.
USEPA (6204J)
Clean Air Markets Division
haeuber.richard@epa.gov
202-343-9250
http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets
http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From:	"Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
To:	Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Cc:	Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:	02/03/2012 04:01 PM
Subject:	RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Thanks, Rick.  I will forward this info as well. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 3:23 PM
To: Kymn, Christine J.
Cc: Jeb Stenhouse
Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Christine,
As promised, here is some additional information that, I hope, provides helpful detail in regard to our recent discussion on technology.

-- We based our scrubber assumptions in the final CSAPR rule on EIA form
860 which provides information on the capability (i.e., "design"
parameters under normal operating conditions) of scrubbers, as opposed to actual historical performance data.  At that time, we assumed that 100% of flue gas was treated at all scrubbers.
-- We responded to comments in the final rule and defended at that time that we should, as we did, use capability rather than actual performance data.
-- In the proposed revisions rule, when we tried to address the concern raised by facilities in Texas that due to stack configurations 100% of the flue gas was not being treated by the scrubber, we deviated from the approach taken in the final CSAPR when we based the proposed revisions for flue gas bypass on one historical year's performance from the 2008 EIA form 923 for the units in Texas.
-- We received comments from EDF, Sierra Club and NRDC pointing out the inconsistency with the approach used in the final CSAPR rule and suggesting we use scrubber capability information on flue gas bypass that is included on EIA form 860, consistent with what we did in the final rule, for the adjustment for those units.
-- In this final revisions rule, we acknowledge the mistake in using the performance data from from the 2008 EIA form 923 for Texas in the revisions proposal, as opposed to scrubber capability from EIA form 860, and the correction of that mistake, which we made by taking into account scrubber capability data from EIA form 860 in this final notice.
-- Consistent with this final approach for the units in Texas and with the final CSAPR rule, we have also applied this approach in the direct final in responding to a comment we received in the CSAPR revisions proposal to address flue gas bypass for units in Indiana.

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.
USEPA (6204J)
Clean Air Markets Division
haeuber.richard@epa.gov
202-343-9250
http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets
http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From:	"Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
To:	Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Cc:	Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:	02/06/2012 02:44 PM
Subject:	Re: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

I haven't heard any requests for additional info but will let you know stat if I do.

I'm told Sarah called about these - is it the same question?
Thx!
 
From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 12:01 PM
To: Kymn, Christine J. 
Cc: Jeb Stenhouse <Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov> 
Subject: Re: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule 
 
No, still waiting here as well. Just to securely close this loop - we got you everything you need other than that final discussion, right?

Thanks
Richard Haeuber
Sent by EPA Wireless E-Mail Services

  From: "Kymn, Christine J." [Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov]
  Sent: 02/06/2012 02:51 PM GMT
  To: Richard Haeuber
  Cc: Jeb Stenhouse
  Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Hi Rick,
Sorry I haven't heard anything yet.  Anything from your end? Teleworking again today so feel free to give me a ring on the BB (202.631.6551).
Thanks,
Christine
 
From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 7:46 AM
To: Kymn, Christine J.
Cc: Jeb Stenhouse
Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule
 
Good morning Christine -- just checking in to see if we've made any progress. I'll be in the office shortly and look forward to hearing from you.
 
Thanks

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.
USEPA (6204J)
Clean Air Markets Division
haeuber.richard@epa.gov
202-343-9250
http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets
http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

-----"Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> wrote: -----
To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
Date: 02/03/2012 04:01PM
Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule
Thanks, Rick.  I will forward this info as well. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 3:23 PM
To: Kymn, Christine J.
Cc: Jeb Stenhouse
Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Christine,
As promised, here is some additional information that, I hope, provides helpful detail in regard to our recent discussion on technology.

-- We based our scrubber assumptions in the final CSAPR rule on EIA form
860 which provides information on the capability (i.e., "design"
parameters under normal operating conditions) of scrubbers, as opposed to actual historical performance data.  At that time, we assumed that 100% of flue gas was treated at all scrubbers.
-- We responded to comments in the final rule and defended at that time that we should, as we did, use capability rather than actual performance data.
-- In the proposed revisions rule, when we tried to address the concern raised by facilities in Texas that due to stack configurations 100% of the flue gas was not being treated by the scrubber, we deviated from the approach taken in the final CSAPR when we based the proposed revisions for flue gas bypass on one historical year's performance from the 2008 EIA form 923 for the units in Texas.
-- We received comments from EDF, Sierra Club and NRDC pointing out the inconsistency with the approach used in the final CSAPR rule and suggesting we use scrubber capability information on flue gas bypass that is included on EIA form 860, consistent with what we did in the final rule, for the adjustment for those units.
-- In this final revisions rule, we acknowledge the mistake in using the performance data from from the 2008 EIA form 923 for Texas in the revisions proposal, as opposed to scrubber capability from EIA form 860, and the correction of that mistake, which we made by taking into account scrubber capability data from EIA form 860 in this final notice.
-- Consistent with this final approach for the units in Texas and with the final CSAPR rule, we have also applied this approach in the direct final in responding to a comment we received in the CSAPR revisions proposal to address flue gas bypass for units in Indiana.

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.
USEPA (6204J)
Clean Air Markets Division
haeuber.richard@epa.gov
202-343-9250
http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets
http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets
----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From:	"Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
To:	Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Cc:	Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:	02/06/2012 06:01 PM
Subject:	EO 13563 12866 Review CSAPR Amendment DFR

Rick,
Could you get in touch with OP and have them upload a clean copy of the DFR (part II)?  ROCIS is open for amendment. 
Thanks,
Christine

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From:	"Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
To:	Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
Date:	02/06/2012 07:22 PM
Subject:	RE: EO 13563 12866 Review CSAPR Amendment DFR

Thanks, Jeb.  Can you ask them to shoot me an email when it's in? 
Have a great evening,
Christine

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeb Stenhouse [mailto:Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov] 
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 6:54 PM
To: Kymn, Christine J.; Richard Haeuber
Subject: Re: EO 13563 12866 Review CSAPR Amendment DFR

Hello Christine,

Just wanted to send a note that we have notified OP and understand they will upload the clean direct final rule into ROCIS first thing tomorrow morning. 

Thanks,
Jeb

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kymn, Christine J." [Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov]
Sent: 02/06/2012 11:01 PM GMT
To: Richard Haeuber
Cc: Jeb Stenhouse
Subject: EO 13563 12866 Review CSAPR Amendment DFR

Rick,
Could you get in touch with OP and have them upload a clean copy of the DFR (part II)?  ROCIS is open for amendment. 
Thanks,
Christine