Document ID: EPA-HQ-OECA-2007-0917-0006
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2007-10-15T04:00Z

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - October 2007

Compliance and Enforcement National Priority

Clean Water Act, Wet Weather, Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations
(CAFOs)

What is the Environmental Problem?

CAFOs have been regulated under the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) program since the mid-1970s.  In February
2003, EPA promulgated new CAFO regulations to update the NPDES program
and prevent environmental harm from these operations through better
management of animal waste.  The 2003 regulation required all CAFOs with
a potential to discharge to be covered by NPDES permits.  Because of the
2005 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in
Waterkeeper v. EPA (399 F.3d 486), EPA requires only CAFOs that
discharge or propose to discharge to apply for a NPDES permit.  EPA is
also revising its CAFO regulations regarding the development of nutrient
management plans to address changes mandated by the Waterkeeper
decision.  

An ongoing trend toward fewer but larger farm operations, together with
greater emphasis on intensive animal production methods, increases
environmental and public health risks by concentrating large volumes of
animal waste within geographic areas.  In addition, many large
operations often do not have sufficient cropland to effectively utilize
the manure they generate as fertilizer.  The U.S. Department of
Agriculture estimates that operations that confine livestock and poultry
animals generate about 500 million tons of manure annually – three
times EPA’s estimate of 150 million tons of human sanitary waste
produced annually in the U.S.  Under Section 305(b) of the CWA, states
have consistently identified agricultural sources - including CAFOs - as
a leading contributor of water quality impairment in state-assessed
surface waters. 

Pollutants associated with animal waste primarily include nutrients --
mainly nitrogen and phosphorus -- but animal waste may also include
organic matter, solids, pathogens, pesticides, antibiotics, hormones,
salts and various trace elements (including metals).  If manure and
wastewater are not properly managed, pollutants can be released into the
environment through discharges from animal confinement areas, manure
storage areas, and/or from cropland where manure is applied as
fertilizer.    

Why Are We Addressing this Problem?

Inadequate manure management and the resulting risks, a pattern of CWA
noncompliance in the industry, and the need for EPA leadership in
implementing the federal CAFO regulations contributed to OECA’s
decision to continue CAFOs as a CWA national priority.  The 2005
Waterkeeper decision that eliminated the requirement that virtually all
CAFOs obtain permits, resulted in uncertainty in the regulated community
regarding the direction of the CAFO program.  EPA’s strategy helps to
clarify that the CWA and the federal regulations prohibit discharges
from a CAFO, even one that is unplanned or accidental, unless it is
authorized by the terms of a permit.  

Any facility that meets the regulatory definition of a “CAFO” as it
was defined in the 1976 rule and discharges, needs a NPDES permit now. 

Nationwide, EPA’s Office of Water estimates that there are
approximately 19,000 large and medium CAFOs, and roughly 8,300 or 43
percent of these operations currently have NPDES permits.  EPA will lead
by example and focus on identifying and addressing those facilities most
likely to need NPDES permits based on provisions of the federal CAFO
regulations that have been on the books since the 1970s.  

How will the Problem be Addressed?

Because it is impossible for EPA to identify and address all CAFOs that
have unauthorized discharges and need permits in a timely manner,
strategically targeted inspections and enforcement actions and
publicized enforcement results will be utilized.  Federal inspections
and enforcement actions will focus primarily on existing large and
medium CAFOs identified as discharging without a permit to maximize
deterrence against noncompliance with the permitting requirement of the
CWA and to improve the technical capability of EPA Regions and,
ultimately, states to identify and address CWA violations at CAFOs.  In
selecting which facilities to investigate, EPA will consider factors
such as: size and type of operation, proximity to waters of the U.S.,
proximity to impaired waters or priority watersheds, citizen complaints
and manure spill data, environmental harm, compliance history, and
environmental justice.  

EPA will continue to refine its understanding of the CAFO universe,
improve targeting of compliance and enforcement activities to increase
CAFO NPDES permit coverage, and assess and communicate the effectiveness
of its actions.  EPA believes that ensuring that CAFOs that need permits
obtain them is critical to improving manure management and addressing
the environmental problems associated with this industry.

Through this strategy, EPA will consider the critical role of individual
state commitments to CAFO permitting in achieving a level playing field.
 EPA will target compliance and enforcement activities in states with
lower levels of CAFO permit coverage.  

Although not the emphasis of EPA’s strategy, some federal actions will
address CAFOs that have NPDES permits and are in violation of their
permit requirements.  These actions also support the overall theme of
EPA’s strategy that appropriate CAFO permit coverage resulting in
proper manure management is important.

Highlights from the FY 2005-2007 Planning Cycle

EPA has established an internal national CAFO work group to provide a
forum for discussing CAFO compliance and enforcement issues and
identifying training needs.  OECA has provided and continues to develop
additional technical training to support EPA Regions in the development
of CAFO CWA cases.

In fiscal year 2006, nine out of ten EPA Regions either met or
significantly exceeded their CWA commitments to conduct federal CAFO
inspections and to conduct joint CAFO inspections with their states,
resulting in 262 federal CAFO inspections conducted and 130 CAFO joint
and/or oversight inspections conducted.  EPA also concluded 56
enforcement actions against CAFOs for CWA violations that year, with a
total value of over $400,000 in administrative penalties and an
estimated 12 million pounds of pollutants reduced via those actions.  

A number of EPA Regions are using a variety of sampling and modeling
tools to develop cases against existing CAFOs with unauthorized
discharges.  Recent EPA enforcement actions reflect the high level of
sophistication at which some Regions are performing in conducting CAFO
compliance investigations. 

 PAGE   

Final: CAFO Summary		October 2007

 PAGE   

 PAGE   1 

Draft: CAFOs Summary		09/11/07