Document ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0812-0008
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2010-11-17T05:00Z

SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Washington, D.C. 20460	

								OFFICE OF CHEMICAL STAFETY AND

                                                                        
                                                                        
                                          POLLUTION PREVENTION

								

Date: 		April 29, 2010 

PC Code: 	006329

DP Barcode: D368426 and 368579

MEMORANDUM 					

Subject:	Acequinocyl and its Degradate, Acequinocyl-OH (R1), Drinking
Water Assessment in Support of IR-4 New Uses Registration for Fruiting
Vegetables (Crop Group 8), Okra, Edible Podded Beans, and Hops.

To:		Sarah Levy, RAB 1

		Dana Vogel, Branch Chief, RAB1

		Health Effects Division (7509P)

		Venus Eagle, RM 01

		Autumn Metzger, PM

		Insecticide Branch

Registration Division (7505P)

From:	Iwona L. Maher, Chemist, ERBI

	Stephen Wente, Ph.D., Chemist, ERBI

	Brian Anderson, RAPL, ERBI

		Anita Pease, Acting Branch Chief, ERBI

Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P)

This memorandum summarizes the drinking water assessment for the IR-4
New Use registration of Kanemite 15 SC acequinocyl, miticide, for
fruiting vegetables (crop group 8), okra, edible podded beans, and hops.
 Acequinocyl is currently registered for almonds, tree nuts, pistachios,
pome fruits, citrus, grapes, strawberries, and ornamentals. The
application rates for the proposed uses are the same as the application
rates for the currently registered agricultural uses; i.e. 0.3 lbs
ai/acre for the maximum single application rate, with two applications
allowed at a minimum interval of 21 days (0.6 lb ai/acre for a seasonal
application rate). This assessment supersedes the previous drinking
water assessment.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A Tier II screening-level drinking water assessment was conducted for
the proposed Section 3 New Use of acequinocyl
(2-(acetyloxy)-3-dodecyl-1,4-naphthalenedione; CAS# 57960-19-7; PC Code
006329) on fruiting vegetables (except cucurbits, field grown and
greenhouse grown), okra, edible podded beans, and hops.  The assessment
is based on the maximum proposed application rate of 0.3 lbs.
a.i./acre/application for apple and tomato, applied by ground foliar
spray two times every 21 days (Kanemite 15 SC; 15.8% a.i.; submitted
July 30, 2009).  In addition to the proposed new use on fruiting
vegetables (except cucurbits field grown and greenhouse grown), okra,
edible podded beans, and hops, this assessment re-evaluates the existing
use on apples and pecans because the previous drinking water assessment
(done in 2007) employed an older version of Perl shell interface program
and older modeling input parameter guidance.

Similar to the previous drinking water assessment, two approaches were
used in performing the drinking water assessment for the proposed
acequinocyl uses.  In Approach #1, acequinocyl was conservatively
assumed to be stable to all routes of degradation to account for the
uncertainties associated with the environmental fate data.  In Approach
#2, total (acequinocyl + acequinocyl-OH) residues were modeled with the
assumption that the metabolite acequinocyl-OH (referred to as the R1
degradate in this assessment) is of toxicological concern.  According to
the HED Metabolism Assessment Review Committee (MARC) the residues of
concern in the dietary exposure and risk assessment are acequinocyl and
acequinocyl-OH (US EPA, 2007; DPs: 330281and 337378).  

Surface water estimated drinking water concentrations (EDWCs) were
generated for acequinocyl using the Pesticide Root Zone Model/Exposure
Analysis Modeling System (PRZM/EXAMS) model. The highest PRZM-EXAMS
surface water modeling estimates were obtained for the Pennsylvania
apple scenario for the acute value, and Pennsylvania tomato scenario for
the chronic values.  The recommended EDWCs for the human health risk
assessment, based on apples, pecans, and tomato uses, are provided in
Table 1.  The EDWCs derived via Approach #1 represent upper bound values
while those derived via Approach #2 represent the lower bound values.  

 

Table 1. PCA Corrected Tier II Estimated Drinking Water Concentrations
(EDWCs) Resulting from Ground Applications of Acequinocyl.

Drinking water source (model)	Use

(modeled rate)	1-in-10 year acute (µg/L)	1-in-10 year chronic (µg/L)
30- year average (µg/L)

Approach #1:  Total Toxic Residues (no acequinocyl degradation)

Surface water (PRZM/EXAMS)	PA Apples (0.6 lb ai/A)	12.22	1.79	1.41

	PA Tomato (0.6 lb ai/A)	12.08	2.45	2.02

Approach #2:  Total Toxic Residues (combined acequinocyl and R1)

Surface water (PRZM/EXAMS)	GA Pecans (0.6 lb ai/A)	5.14	0.17	0.11

	PA Tomato (0.6 lb ai/A)	3.99	0.29	0.20

Approaches #1 and #2: Total Toxic Residues (combined acequinocyl and R1)

Groundwater (SCIGROW)	All Agricultural Uses

(0.6 lb ai/acre)	3.6 x 10-3	≤3.6 x 10-3	≤3.6 x 10-3

Acequinocyl and its major degradate, hydroxy-acequinocyl, were not
monitored in surface and groundwater under the USGS’s National Water
Quality Assessment (NAWQA) program. Although the fate and transport
database is complete, most of the environmental fate studies submitted
prior to the initial registration were classified ‘supplemental’ due
to numerous deficiencies identified in the fate studies such as poor
chromatographic separation of acequinocyl and R1, use of
chloroform:methanol solvent system, lack of LOD and LOQ data, un-eluted
radioactive residues in the solid phase extraction process, and lack of
storage stability data. These issues need to be addressed by the
registrant to upgrade the fate studies.

2.	PROBLEM FORMULATION

Background

The most recent regulatory actions for acequinocyl include the
following:

•	Section 3 Request for Uses of Acequinocyl (P.C. Code: 006329) on
Greenhouse, Shade house, Ornamental, Floral, Foliage and Nursery Crops.
August 7, 2003 (US EPA 2003, D291707)

•	Section 3 Request for Uses of Acequinocyl (P.C. Code: 006329) on
Pome Fruits, Citrus, Almonds, Pistachios, Strawberries and Outdoor
Ornamentals. February 3, 2004.  (US EPA 2004, DP Barcodes: D285811,
D286428, D289153, D290010, D287269, D290009, D291174)

•	Ecological Risk Assessment for Use of Acequinocyl (PC 006329) on
Grapes, Pome Fruits, Citrus, Nuts, and Outdoor Non-Food Uses.  August
17, 2007.  (US EPA 2007, DP 337381, 330467, 330471)

•	Tier II Drinking Water Assessment for Acequinocyl.  June 27, 2007
(US EPA 2007, DP337221)

The previous PRZM-EXAMS EDWC estimates were based on the Pennsylvania
apple crop scenario.  The 1-in-10-year annual peak (acute) concentration
of parent acequinocyl was 13.4 µg/L, the 1-in-10-year annual daily mean
(chronic-non cancer) concentration was 2.73 µg/L, and the 30-year
annual mean was 2.3 µg/L based on the Approach #1. Based on Approach
#2, the acute, chronic-non cancer, and 30-year annual mean
concentrations were 10.81 µg/L, 0.37 µg/L, and 0.2 µg/L,
respectively, for acequinocyl and its R1 degradate. The ground water
EDWC for acequinocyl and acequinocyl-OH in shallow ground water sources
was 0.0036 µg/L for acequinocyl applied twice every 21 days regardless
of the type of model approach used. These EDWCs from shallow ground
water sources are expected remain the same for the proposed uses as
acequinocyl proposed use rates are the same as the currently registered
food use rates.  In the previous assessment, EFED recommended use of
acequinocyl EDWCs derived using Approach #1, in the event that HED finds
R1 is not of toxicological concern.

	

Mode of Action

Acequinocyl is a miticide. Its mode of action is mediated by both the
parent chemical and its primary degradate,
2-dodecyl-3-hydroxy-1,4-napthoquinone (also referred to as R1,
deacetylated acequinocyl, acequinocyl-OH, OH-AKD 2023, or AKM-05)
through the inhibition of electron transfer in mitochondria.

Use Characteristics

KANEMITE 15 SC is a miticide for the control of Citrus red mite
(Panonychus citri), European

red mite (Panonychus ulmi), Pacific spider mite (Tetranychus pacificus),
Texas citrus mite

(Eutetranychus banskl) and Spruce spider mite (Oligonychus ununquis),
Strawberry spider mite

(Tetranychus turkestam), Willamette spider mite (Eotetranychus
willamettel), Two spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae and
Tetranychus cinnabarinus), and Broad mite (Polyphagotarsonamus latus). 
According to the registrant, when applied to the foliage, KANEMITE 15 SC
provides quick knockdown and long residual control. Due to its unique
mode of action, KANEMITE 15 SC is not expected to have cross-resistance
to existing miticides and is reportedly very effective against various
species of resistant and susceptible mites. 

Acequinocyl initial food use registration was for pome fruits, citrus,
almonds, pistachios, strawberries, and outdoor ornamentals (US EPA,
2004).  Currently, the registrant proposed new uses for acequinocyl
include fruiting vegetables (except field grown and greenhouse grown
cucurbits) (eggplant, groundcherry (Physalis spp.), pepino, pepper
(includes bell pepper, chili pepper, cooking pepper, pimento, sweet
pepper, tomatillo, and tomato), okra, edible podded beans, and hops. The
maximum application rates for the proposed uses are not to exceed 0.3 lb
ai/acre for a single application rate, and 0.6 lb ai/acre for a seasonal
application rate, with a minimum reapplication interval of 21 days. The
maximum proposed application rates are same as the application rates for
currently registered acequinocyl agricultural uses.  Table 2 summarizes
the application rates and application methods for acequinocyl proposed
and currently registered uses.

Product Information

Product Name:  KANEMITETM 15 SC Miticide Ingredients

Active Ingredient:  Acequinocyl 

(3-dodecyl-1, 4-dihydro-1,
4-dioxo-2-naphthyl-acetate)…………...………………………15.
8%

Inert
Ingredients……………………………………………………
……………………….84.2%

Total…………………………………………………………
…………………………….100.00

Contains 1.25 lb ai/gal.

Table 2.  Acequinocyl proposed use pattern for fruiting vegetables,
okra, beans, hops, and registered uses1. 

Crop	Maximum Individual

Application Rate

lbs a.i./A	Number of

Applications 

	Minimum

Application Interval (days)	Maximum Annual Application Rate in

lbs a.i./A/year	Application Method

Fruiting vegetables, okra, edible podded beans, and hop	0.3	2	21	0.6
Ground spray

Citrus, tree nuts, grapes, pome fruits, and strawberries1	0.3	2	21	0.6
Ground spray

Outdoor ornamentals1 	0.125	22	14	0.25	Ground spray

1- Represent the registered food and non-food outdoor uses per label
submitted July 30, 2009

2- Calculated by dividing the max annual application rate by the max
individual application rate.

The product label use restrictions specify that the product is not to be
applied via irrigation, via aerial application, or within 75 feet of
aquatic areas. In addition, it is not intended for indoor residential
use.

Currently, the label includes the following surface water statement:

“This product may contaminate water through drift of spray in wind.
This product has a potential

for runoff for several days after application. Poorly draining soils and
soils with shallow water

tables are more prone to produce runoff that contains this product. A
level, well maintained

vegetative buffer strip between areas to which this product is applied
and surface water features

such as ponds, streams, and springs will reduce the potential for
contamination of water from

rainfall-runoff. Runoff of this product will be reduced by avoiding
applications when rainfall is

forecasted to occur within 48 hours. Sound erosion control practices
will reduce this product's

contribution to surface water contamination.”

Conceptual Model

Risk Hypothesis

For acequinocyl, the following risk hypothesis is being employed for
this national-scale drinking water assessment:

Acequinocyl, when used in accordance with proposed labels, can result in
off-site movement of the compound product via runoff and spray drift,
leading to human exposure to acequinocyl and its degradate
acequinocyl-OH (R1) through consumption of contaminated drinking water. 

Conceptual Model

Submitted fate and transport data indicate that acequinocyl is highly
reactive, with breakdown potentially occurring quickly via both
photolysis and hydrolysis. Acequinocyl can reach surface water via spray
drift and less likely via runoff. Once acequinocyl has entered surface
water, it is not likely to persist as it will hydrolyze to form
hydroxy-acequinocyl (also known as OH-AKD 023,
2-hydroxy-3-dodecyl-1,4-napthelenedione (HDNQ), and R-1). 

The source of the stressor considered herein is acequinocyl (PC Code
006329).  The source and mechanism of release for the proposed new uses
of acequinocyl are foliar ground application.  The mechanisms of
acequinocyl transport are spray drift (parent) and potentially surface
water runoff (degradate).  Leaching into groundwater is not expected to
be a major contributor, based on submitted laboratory studies,
indicating that acequinocyl has very low mobility potential.  Surface
water runoff from the areas of application is assumed to follow
topography.  Spray drift will follow the wind directions.  

Potential emission of volatile compounds is not considered as a viable
release mechanism for acequinocyl, since volatilization is not expected
to be a significant route of dissipation for this chemical because of
the low vapor pressure of the compound. These transport mechanisms (e.g.
sources) are depicted in the conceptual model below (Figure 1) and
result in the potential movement of acequinocyl and hydroxy-acequinocyl
into surface water, and less likely into ground water. In surface water,
acequinocyl appears to be short lived to form hydroxy-acequinocyl.
Volatilization, crop uptake, and tile drainage are potential mechanisms
of transport that are depicted in the model, but not considered in this
assessment due to their low significance for acequinocyl transport.

	

 		Figure 1.  Conceptual model for acequinocyl mechanism 

		of release and transport into drinking water sources.  

Analysis Plan

Two approaches were used in this drinking water assessment for the
proposed acequinocyl uses to account for the deficiencies identified in
the registrant-submitted fate studies.  In Approach #1, acequinocyl was
conservatively assumed to be stable to all routes of degradation to
account for the uncertainties associated with the environmental fate
data.  In Approach #2, total (acequinocyl + acequinocyl-OH) residues
were modeled assuming that the R1 metabolite is of toxicological
concern.  In both approaches, surface water EDWCs were generated for
acequinocyl using the PRZM/EXAMS model.  

The previous PRZM-EXAMS surface water modeling estimates were based on
the Pennsylvania apple crop scenario.  For this assessment, PA Apple and
GA Pecan scenarios were re-evaluated with the use of updated Perl shell
interface program, PE5.pl (November 15, 2006), according to the current
modeling input parameter guidance (Version 2.1; US EPA, Oct. 22, 2009). 
Additionally, seven scenarios were modeled for the proposed uses. 
Fruiting vegetables were represented by Pennsylvania, California, and
Florida tomato and Florida pepper scenarios, edible podded beans by
Michigan beans and Oregon snap beans scenarios, and hops were
represented by Oregon hops scenario.  Currently, EFED does not have an
okra scenario; therefore, Florida tomato and pepper scenarios were
considered to be surrogate scenarios for the okra proposed uses. Okra
can be grown throughout the Florida state, but commercial production is
concentrated in the Dade County area and bordering counties.  In 2004,
Florida okra production was estimated at 1,500 acres (Florida Crop
Profile:    HYPERLINK
"http://www.ipmcenters.org/CropProfiles/docs/FLokra.pdf" 
http://www.ipmcenters.org/CropProfiles/docs/FLokra.pdf ).

Acequinocyl ground water EDWCs are the same as assessed in the previous
drinking water assessment since the proposed application rates and
intervals are the same as currently registered food uses.

	

ANALYSIS

3.1.	Fate and Transport Characterization

Based on the environmental fate data reviewed for the initial
registration that appeared to be of uncertain quality, acequinocyl
appeared to undergo fairly rapid transformation in most aquatic and
terrestrial environments. The chemical hydrolyzed with a half-life of a
few hours to less than 2 days under neutral and alkaline pH conditions
(MRID 45434908). However, it was stable under acidic pH conditions.
Photodegradation in water appeared to be the main route of degradation
in aquatic environments, with half-lives of less than 15 minutes in
sterile lab and river water. Acequinocyl also appeared to undergo fast
degradation in terrestrial environments. The half-lives for aerobic
biotransformation on soil were less than 2 days under laboratory
conditions (MRID 45434911). Under field conditions, acequinocyl applied
to bare plots dissipated with half-lives ranging from 2 hrs in
California to 14 hours in New York (MRID 45651601). In contrast, the
residue decline data submitted for the Magnitude of Residue studies on
apples, pears, oranges, grapefruit, lemon and almonds indicated a mean
half-life of 20 days.  

Acequinocyl presented very low mobility in soil. The soil adsorption Kd
for acequinocyl ranged from 678 ml/g in sandy loam soil to 1,620 ml/g in
silty clay loam soil (MRID 45531902) based on a study with one test
concentration as opposite of four test concentrations as Subdivision N
guidelines specify. In the field studies, the parent was not detected
below 0-15 cm soil depth (MRID 45651601). The major transformation
products detected in the field included R1 (2-dodecyl-3-hydroxy-1,
4-napthoquinone) and AKM-18 [2-(1,2-dioxotetradecyl) benzoic acid].

Based on acequinocyl bioconcentration factor in fish (BCF ranged from
307 to 387 (MRID 45434923)) and its rather high octanol/water partition
coefficient (Log Kow ≥ 6.2), acequinocyl can expect to bioconcentrate
in fish if found in water.  Since acequinocyl has low vapor pressure of
1.7 x 10-9 PA (at 25 oC) and very low water solubility of 0.006 mg/L,
any losses due to volatilization are expected to be minimal.  Further
details on fate studies and other fate properties of acequinocyl can be
accessed from the original risk assessment document (US EPA, 2004). 
Table 3 provides summary of physical and chemical properties of
acequinocyl.  Table 1.1 of Appendix I provides a summary of acequinocyl
major degradates and their maximum percent formation observed in the
laboratory and field studies.

Structural Formula of Acequinocyl Major Degradate:

Acequinocyl-OH 

Hydroxy acequinocyl or R1

6.69 μg/L at 200C (technical)	

Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient (Log Kow):	(6.2 (technical)

Molecular Weight:	384.5

Melting Point:		59.6(C (technical)

Density:		1.13 g/cm3

A - These physical and chemical properties are for the end-use product
unless otherwise noted. 

Drinking Water Exposure Modeling

	

	3.2.1.	Surface Water Modeling

The Tier II drinking water assessment was performed using PRZM (v3.12.2;
May 12, 2005)/EXAMS (v. 2.98.04.06; April 25, 2005) modeling with index
reservoir (IR) scenarios and percent cropped area (PCA) adjustment
factors.  In performing the drinking water assessment for the proposed
acequinocyl uses, two approaches were taken.  In Approach #1,
acequinocyl was conservatively assumed to be stable to all routes of
degradation because of the uncertainties associated with the
environmental fate data. In Approach #2, total (acequinocyl +
acequinocyl-OH) residues were modeled assuming that the R1 metabolite is
of toxicological concern.  All half-lives used in this modeling approach
were calculated based on the total (acequinocyl + R1) residues. 
Additionally, the adsorption coefficient (Kd) for the metabolite R1 was
used in the modeling as R1 is more mobile than acequinocyl.

Table 3 lists the input parameters used for the PRZM/EXAMS modeling of
acequinocyl and the R1 degradate.  Table 4 presents PRZM/EXAMS estimated
drinking water concentrations from surface water sources for acequinocyl
and the R1 degradate for proposed (apples and pecans) and registered
(fruiting vegetables, edible podded beans, okra, and hopes) uses.

Table 4.  PRZM/EXAMS Inputs Parameter Values for Acequinocyl Total Toxic
Residue 

                                                         Approach 1 and
2.

Parameter (Units)	Input Value and Unit	Source of Information

	Approach #11	Approach #22

	Maximum Application Rate	0.3 lb ai/acre (all uses)	Proposed label

Maximum Number of Applications	2	Proposed label

Minimum Reapplications Interval	21 days	Proposed label

Modeling Scenarios	PA Apple

Fruiting Vegetable:

Pepper: FL Pepper

Tomato: CA Tomato

               PA Tomato

               FL Tomato

Edible Podded Beans:

MI Beans

OR Snap Beans

Hops:

OR Hops 	EFED standard PRZM/EXAMS scenarios

Initial Application Dates (dd-mm)	1/4 (PA Apple)

24/5(GA Pecans)

Fruiting Vegetables:

Pepper: FL Pepper: 15-10 (okra)

Tomato: CA Tomato: 21-07

               PA Tomato: 01-09

          FL Tomato: 01-04 (okra)

Edible Podded Beans:

MI Beans:  08-06

OR Snap Beans:  22-06

Hops:

OR Hops:  07-04	EFED application dates from DP 337381, 330467, 330471

Application Method	Ground, Foliar (CAM = 2)	Acequinocyl is a foliar
application

Application Efficiency Fraction	0.99	EFED standard default for ground
applications

Spray Drift Loading Fraction	0.064 ground

0.063 air blast (apples)	EFED standard default for ground applications
for all, but apples

Incorporation depth (cm)	0	Default for foliar applications

Molecular Weight (g/mole)	384.5	Product Chemistry

Water Solubility (mg/L)	0.0067	Product Chemistry

Vapor Pressure (torr)	1.268 × 10-6	Product Chemistry

Henry’s Law Constant (atm-m3/mol)	3.9 × 10-5	Product Chemistry

Kd (ml/g)	1027	970 	MRID 45531902; 45434907

Hydrolysis Half-life (days)	stable	9.6	MRID 45434908

Aqueous Photolysis Half-life (days)	stable	0.19	MRID 45434909

Aerobic Soil Metabolism (days)	stable	48.53	MRID 45434911

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism (days)	stable	97	Twice the aerobic soil
metabolism t1/2 based on the Input Parameter Guidance Manual, Pesticides
(Version 2.1; Oct. 22, 2009)1

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism (days)	stable	649.8	MRID 45434913

1Parent was assumed to be stable in the environment

2Combined half-live values for parent acequinocyl and acequinocyl-OH
(R1) degradate

3The average of four Kads values (678, 1,620, 761, and 1,050) was used
(1067), as the study was conducted only on one concentration.

4Binding was not correlated with organic carbon content so the mean Kads
value of four values (3,400, 27, 380, and 72) was used (970). 

5This half-life value represents the upper 90 percent confidence of the
mean for acequinocyl+R1 residues

Table 5.  PRZM/EXAMS Estimated Drinking Water Concentrations (EDWCs) for
Acequinocyl Total Toxic Residue based on Approachs #1 and #2A.

Scenario	Estimated Drinking Water Concentrations

from Surface Water Sources (µg/L)

	1-in-10 year annual peak	1-in-10 year annual mean	36 year annual

mean

Approach #1:  Total Toxic Residues (no acequinocyl degradation)

PA Apples	12.22	1.79	1.41

PA Tomato	12.08	2.45	2.02

FL Tomato	8.55	1.70	1.12

CA Tomato	1.95	0.36	0.25

FL Peppers	9.07	1.74	1.11

MI Beans	6.90	1.80	1.29

OR Snap Beans	7.19	2.19	1.53

OR Hops	6.94	1.65	1.27

Approach #2:  Total Toxic Residues (combined acequinocyl and R1)

GA Pecans	5.14	0.17	0.11

PA Tomato	3.99	0.29	0.20

FL Tomato	1.37	0.09	0.06

CA Tomato	0.68	0.03	0.03

FL Peppers	1.56	0.06	0.04

MI Beans	1.66	0.10	0.08

OR Snap Beans	0.72	0.09	0.07

OR Hops	0.76	0.05	0.04

A – A default PCA of 0.87 was applied

Regardless of the food crop use, a default PCA value of 0.87 was applied
to EDWCs. Among all the registered and proposed new uses, the highest
EDWCs from surface water sources were derived using Approach #1 for
ground application of acequinocyl to PA apples scenario for the acute
value, and Pennsylvania tomato scenario for the chronic values simulated
at the maximum annual application rate of 0.6 lb ai/acre.  The acute
EDWCs in surface water (1-in-10 year annual peak concentration) reached
a maximum of 12.2 μg/L (PA Apple), the chronic non-cancer EDWC (1-
in-10 year annual average concentration) is expected not to exceed 2.45
μg/L (PA Tomato), and the cancer/chronic drinking water concentration
(30-year annual average) is expected not to exceed 2.02 μg/L (PA
Tomato).  The PRZM/EXAMS output files for selected modeled scenarios are
provided in the Appendix II.

	3.2.2.	Ground Water Modeling 

μg/L based on the maximum application rate of 0.6 lb ai/acre.  This
concentration can be considered as both the acute and chronic value. 
For details regarding SCI-GROW modeling refer to the previous drinking
water assessment (US EPA, 2007). 

	3.2.3. Assumptions and Uncertainties

The following uncertainties have been identified in the environmental
fate properties and drinking water assessment for acequinocyl:

•	Most of the environmental fate studies submitted prior to the
initial registration were classified ‘supplemental’ due to
deficiencies identified in the fate studies such as poor chromatographic
separation of acequinocyl and R1, use of chloroform : methanol solvent
system, lack of LOD and LOQ data, un-eluted radioactive residues in the
solid phase extraction process, and lack of storage stability data. 

•	In PRZM/EXAMS modeling, Approach #1, acequinocyl was conservatively
assumed to be stable to all routes of degradation to account for the
uncertainties associated with the environmental fate data.  This
approach generated conservative, upper bound, EDWCs for acequinocyl. 
Therefore, exposure to acequinocyl maybe overestimated.  

•	The impact of spray drift buffers was not considered in this
drinking water assessment. With a 75 ft. spray drift buffer (spray drift
fraction = .006), the ground application effective drift to a water body
would be smaller than without the buffer (0.063).  However, based on
comparison of EDWCs (not corrected for PCA) derived for the PA Apples
scenario  with and without the 75 ft spray drift buffer, the impact of
spray drift on the EDWCs is minimal.  

		Prob.	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.1	14.044	8.871	4.6167	3.0479	2.7325	2.0553 (Spray drift fraction =
.063)

0.1	13.965	8.7949	4.5306	2.9738	2.6666	1.9749 (Spray drift fraction =
.006)	

	

•	SCI-GROW estimated the concentration of acequinocyl (Approach #1)
and total residue (acequinocyl+R1; Approach #2) in shallow ground water
sources to be <0.0036 μg/L.  The ground water EDWCs were obtained using
the median Koc value of 37,550 ml/g for acequinocyl, and the median Koc
value of 36,000 ml/g for the total (acequinocyl+R1) residues, which are
greater than the Koc limit of 9,995 ml/g, and are beyond the scope of
the regression data used in SCI GROW development.  If there are concerns
for such chemicals, a higher tier groundwater exposure assessment should
be considered, regardless of the concentration returned by SCI-GROW.

•	Two method validation studies (MRID 46182601 and 46182602) submitted
by the registrant to determine the concentrations of acequinocyl and its
metabolite(s) in soil and water extracts were reviewed by the EPA’s
Environmental Chemistry Laboratory. The registrant was informed of the
suggested amendments and request for new calibration data in a memo
dated 27 June, 2007.  Recently, the registrant submitted the amended
analytical method for determination of residues of acequinocyl and its
major metabolite R1 (hydroxy-acequinocyl) in drinking water, ground
water and surface water (MRID 48016602), and the amended analytical
method for the determination of acequinocyl, hydroxy-acequinocyl, and
AKM-18 in soil (MRID 48016601).  The Agency is in the process of
reviewing these submitted studies.

    3.3.     Drinking Water Treatment

	

No specific information was available for the behavior of acequinocyl
during drinking water treatment.

4.	DATA REQUIREMENTS

Most of the environmental fate studies submitted prior to the initial
registration were classified ‘supplemental’ due to deficiencies such
as poor chromatographic separation of acequinocyl and R1, use of
chloroform: methanol solvent system, lack of LOD and LOQ data, un-eluted
radioactive residues in the solid phase extraction process, and lack of
storage stability data. These issues need to be addressed by the
registrant to upgrade the fate studies. 

REFERENCES

Orr, Gary R. 2009.  Determination of Acequinocyl, Acequinocyl-OH, and
AKM-18 in Soil Minor Analytical Revision of Method-136, Revision #2. 
Performing Laboratory:  Arysta LifeScience North America, LLC. 
Laboratory Project ID: ARY-0413-2455153. Completion Date: November 18,
2009. (MRID 48016601) 

Orr, Gary R. 2009.  Determination of Residues of AKD 2023 and Its Major
Metabolite R1 (Hydroxy AKD'2023) in Drinking Water, Ground Water and
Surface Water. Minor Analytical Revision of Method-AGK/076. Arysta
LifeScience North America, LLC.  Laboratory Project ID: ARY-0413-
2455183. Completion Date: December 18, 2009. (MRID 48016602) 

 

U.S. EPA. 2003.  Section 3 Request for Uses of Acequinocyl (P.C. Code:
006329) on Greenhouse, Shade house, Ornamental, Floral, Foliage and
Nursery Crops. August 7, 2003 (DP Barcode D291707)

U.S. EPA. 2004.  Section 3 Request for Uses of Acequinocyl (P.C. Code:
006329) on Pome Fruits, Citrus, Almonds, Pistachios, Strawberries and
Outdoor Ornamentals submitted under 

DP Barcodes: D285811, D286428, D289153, D290010, D287269, D290009,
D291174.  February 3, 2004.  (US EPA 2004, DP Barcodes: D285811,
D286428, D289153, D290010, D287269, D290009, D291174)

U.S. EPA. 2005.  Data Evaluation Record Review for Three Studies on
Acequinocyl .  August 31, 2005 (D309566, D309568)

U.S. EPA. 2007.  Ecological Risk Assessment for Use of Acequinocyl (PC
006329) on Grapes, Pome Fruits, Citrus, Nuts, and Outdoor Non-Food Uses.
 August 17, 2007.  (US EPA 2007, DP 337381, 330467, 330471)

U.S. EPA. 2007.  Tier II Drinking Water Assessment for Acequinocyl. 
June 27, 2007 (US EPA 2007, DP337221)

U.S. EPA. 2007.  PP#s 6F7040 and #7F7176.  Human-Health Risk Assessment
for the Proposed Uses of Acequinocyl on Grapes, the Tree Nut Crop Group,
and Residential Sites (Ornamentals).  September 6, 2007 (US EPA, DPs:
330281and 337378)

APPENDIX I

Table 1.1.  Summary of Acequinocyl Major Degradates and Maximum Percent
Formation Observed

in the Laboratory and Field Studies.

Degradate  	Max Degradate Concentration (% of applied) and Time (days1)
to Max Concentration

	Hydrolysis	Aqueous Photolysis	Soil Photolysis	Aerobic Soil Metabolism
Anaerobic Aquatic	Aerobic Aquatic 	TFD

Hydroxyl-acequinocyl

(2-dodecyl-3-hydroxy-1,4-naphthaledione, R1) 	pH 7:  

54.7% (96 hrs)	River water:

11.6% (2 hrs)	   	33.8% (2 days)	Water:

18% (0)

Sediment:

41.5% (3)	12.2% (0 days)	NY:    37.8% (3 hrs)

GA:  37.8% 2 

CA:  26.4% 2

AKM 18  [2-(1,2-dioxotetradecyl)benzoic acid]	pH 7:  

7.1% (48 hrs)

23.7% (6 days)	9.2% (2 days)	Water:

18% (0)

Sediment:

41.5% (3)	19.5% (1 day)	NY:   16.5% (single replicate; 3 hrs)

AKM-08 [2-(2-oxo-dodecyl)-3-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone]

Buffer solution:

12.9% (2 hrs)

	O-Phthalic acid 

Buffer solution:

12.7% (24 hrs)

River water:

11.9% (24 hrs)

	Phenol

River water:

10% (24 hrs)

	CBAA (2-carboxy-α-oxo-benzene acetic acid)

11.3% (2 days)

	1 Unless otherwise specified.  2 Formed immediately after application.

APPENDIX II

PRZM/EXAMS Modeling Output Files for Acequinocyl

Acequinocyl applied to PA Apples via air blast application

stored as acyquPAappleIRab.out

Chemical: acequinocyl

PRZM environment: PAappleSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at
06:16:42

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w14751.dvf	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:15:00

Water segment concentrations (µg/L)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	3.179	1.919	0.7495	0.6019	0.5264	0.2365

1962	2.964	1.948	0.9531	0.7382	0.7249	0.5172

1963	1.302	0.9633	0.7407	0.6792	0.6589	0.5986

1964	2.782	1.894	1.025	0.878	0.8283	0.7192

1965	2.139	1.557	1.036	0.8714	0.8441	0.7661

1966	14.17	8.619	3.289	2.012	1.796	1.05

1967	5.168	3.993	2.6	2.056	1.896	1.497

1968	10.16	6.622	3.131	2.252	2.083	1.712

1969	14.08	8.899	4.68	3.049	2.728	1.945

1970	4.042	3.158	2.537	2.269	2.154	1.968

1971	8.648	5.727	3.066	2.342	2.15	1.727

1972	28.38	18.37	7.265	4.391	3.865	2.432

1973	7.87	5.442	3.045	2.446	2.34	2.229

1974	5.247	4.227	2.632	2.324	2.186	1.891

1975	13.72	9.534	4.425	3.038	2.733	2.032

1976	7.923	5.358	2.927	2.324	2.249	2.057

1977	2.643	2.493	2.25	2.208	2.155	1.787

1978	5.688	3.976	2.934	2.218	2.076	1.759

1979	5.086	3.745	2.654	2.154	1.998	1.781

1980	4.411	3.22	2.271	1.829	1.756	1.585

1981	3.326	2.533	1.952	1.636	1.549	1.43

1982	9.712	6.48	4.638	3.119	2.792	1.897

1983	4.951	3.712	2.402	1.978	1.891	1.707

1984	8.199	5.472	3.083	2.652	2.453	1.965

1985	4.864	3.556	2.534	2.132	2.026	1.895

1986	7.542	5.197	2.904	2.352	2.191	1.893

1987	5.524	3.917	3.184	2.341	2.242	1.874

1988	5.101	3.668	2.226	2.067	1.954	1.734

1989	6.905	4.995	3.101	2.436	2.449	1.955

1990	7.618	5.162	2.786	2.303	2.299	2.04

Sorted results

Prob.		Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	28.38	18.37	7.265	4.391	3.865	2.432

0.0645161290322581	14.17	9.534	4.68	3.119	2.792	2.229

0.0967741935483871	14.08	8.899	4.638	3.049	2.733	2.057

0.129032258064516	13.72	8.619	4.425	3.038	2.728	2.04

0.161290322580645	10.16	6.622	3.289	2.652	2.453	2.032

0.193548387096774	9.712	6.48	3.184	2.446	2.449	1.968

0.225806451612903	8.648	5.727	3.131	2.436	2.34	1.965

0.258064516129032	8.199	5.472	3.101	2.352	2.299	1.955

0.290322580645161	7.923	5.442	3.083	2.342	2.249	1.945

0.32258064516129	7.87	5.358	3.066	2.341	2.242	1.897

0.354838709677419	7.618	5.197	3.045	2.324	2.191	1.895

0.387096774193548	7.542	5.162	2.934	2.324	2.186	1.893

0.419354838709677	6.905	4.995	2.927	2.303	2.155	1.891

0.451612903225806	5.688	4.227	2.904	2.269	2.154	1.874

0.483870967741936	5.524	3.993	2.786	2.252	2.15	1.787

0.516129032258065	5.247	3.976	2.654	2.218	2.083	1.781

0.548387096774194	5.168	3.917	2.632	2.208	2.076	1.759

0.580645161290323	5.101	3.745	2.6	2.154	2.026	1.734

0.612903225806452	5.086	3.712	2.537	2.132	1.998	1.727

0.645161290322581	4.951	3.668	2.534	2.067	1.954	1.712

0.67741935483871	4.864	3.556	2.402	2.056	1.896	1.707

0.709677419354839	4.411	3.22	2.271	2.012	1.891	1.585

0.741935483870968	4.042	3.158	2.25	1.978	1.796	1.497

0.774193548387097	3.326	2.533	2.226	1.829	1.756	1.43

0.806451612903226	3.179	2.493	1.952	1.636	1.549	1.05

0.838709677419355	2.964	1.948	1.036	0.878	0.8441	0.7661

0.870967741935484	2.782	1.919	1.025	0.8714	0.8283	0.7192

0.903225806451613	2.643	1.894	0.9531	0.7382	0.7249	0.5986

0.935483870967742	2.139	1.557	0.7495	0.6792	0.6589	0.5172

0.967741935483871	1.302	0.9633	0.7407	0.6019	0.5264	0.2365

0.1		14.044	8.871	4.6167	3.0479	2.7325	2.0553

					Average of yearly averages:	1.62265333333333

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: acyquPAappleIRab

Metfile:	w14751.dvf

PRZM scenario:	PAappleSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	acequinocyl

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	384.5	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	3.9e-5	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	1.268e-6	torr

Solubility	sol	0.067	mg/L

Kd	Kd	1067	mg/L

Koc	Koc		mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp	0	days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	0	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	0	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	0	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI	0	cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	.336	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	0.99	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.063	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	01-04	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	21	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1	apprate	0.336	kg/ha

Record 17:	FILTRA	

	IPSCND	3

	UPTKF	

Record 18:	PLVKRT	

	PLDKRT	

	FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of
entire run)

Acequinocyl applied to PA Tomato via ground application

stored as acequPAtomatoIRgr.out

stored as acequPAtomatoIRgr.out

Chemical: acequinocyl

PRZM environment: PAtomatoSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at
06:16:42

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w14751.dvf	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:15:00

Water segment concentrations (µg/L)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	1.779	1.197	0.5114	0.3661	0.2586	0.07922

1962	6.747	4.219	1.784	1.564	1.555	0.8346

1963	7.528	4.787	2.425	2.111	1.749	1.317

1964	4.347	3.084	2.441	2.163	2.032	1.658

1965	7.224	5.199	2.957	2.284	2.097	1.69

1966	10.7	6.884	3.633	2.511	2.43	2.004

1967	5.832	4.144	2.867	2.485	2.333	2.124

1968	9.394	6.282	3.334	2.572	2.5	2.184

1969	7.62	5.156	3.329	2.526	2.319	2.103

1970	6.631	4.687	3.385	2.856	2.772	2.425

1971	8.706	5.903	3.752	2.695	2.536	2.297

1972	15.94	10.3	4.749	3.422	3.036	2.72

1973	9.625	6.562	3.682	3.026	2.9	2.691

1974	7.019	5.576	3.351	2.793	2.712	2.55

1975	21.72	15.3	6.746	4.445	3.94	2.738

1976	14.15	9.192	4.759	3.49	3.396	2.819

1977	5.125	4.516	3.546	3.235	3.189	2.741

1978	4.91	4.358	3.486	3.278	3.234	2.673

1979	10.16	7.459	4.726	3.984	3.634	2.92

1980	9.807	6.536	3.483	3.142	2.808	2.439

1981	7.55	5.372	3.309	3.002	2.839	2.426

1982	7.419	5.274	4.136	3.124	2.895	2.596

1983	10.47	7.623	4.697	3.475	3.212	2.599

1984	6.335	4.671	3.375	3.153	3.095	2.81

1985	7.595	5.403	3.608	3.052	2.935	2.697

1986	6.958	5.045	3.298	3.155	3.045	2.736

1987	9.005	6.325	4.058	3.214	3.282	2.824

1988	7.619	5.348	3.408	3.275	3.083	2.607

1989	11.51	8.42	4.366	3.333	3.089	2.585

1990	10.17	6.907	3.993	3.314	3.088	2.695

Sorted results

Prob.		Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	21.72	15.3	6.746	4.445	3.94	2.92

0.0645161290322581	15.94	10.3	4.759	3.984	3.634	2.824

0.0967741935483871	14.15	9.192	4.749	3.49	3.396	2.819

0.129032258064516	11.51	8.42	4.726	3.475	3.282	2.81

0.161290322580645	10.7	7.623	4.697	3.422	3.234	2.741

0.193548387096774	10.47	7.459	4.366	3.333	3.212	2.738

0.225806451612903	10.17	6.907	4.136	3.314	3.189	2.736

0.258064516129032	10.16	6.884	4.058	3.278	3.095	2.72

0.290322580645161	9.807	6.562	3.993	3.275	3.089	2.697

0.32258064516129	9.625	6.536	3.752	3.235	3.088	2.695

0.354838709677419	9.394	6.325	3.682	3.214	3.083	2.691

0.387096774193548	9.005	6.282	3.633	3.155	3.045	2.673

0.419354838709677	8.706	5.903	3.608	3.153	3.036	2.607

0.451612903225806	7.62	5.576	3.546	3.142	2.935	2.599

0.483870967741936	7.619	5.403	3.486	3.124	2.9	2.596

0.516129032258065	7.595	5.372	3.483	3.052	2.895	2.585

0.548387096774194	7.55	5.348	3.408	3.026	2.839	2.55

0.580645161290323	7.528	5.274	3.385	3.002	2.808	2.439

0.612903225806452	7.419	5.199	3.375	2.856	2.772	2.426

0.645161290322581	7.224	5.156	3.351	2.793	2.712	2.425

0.67741935483871	7.019	5.045	3.334	2.695	2.536	2.297

0.709677419354839	6.958	4.787	3.329	2.572	2.5	2.184

0.741935483870968	6.747	4.687	3.309	2.526	2.43	2.124

0.774193548387097	6.631	4.671	3.298	2.511	2.333	2.103

0.806451612903226	6.335	4.516	2.957	2.485	2.319	2.004

0.838709677419355	5.832	4.358	2.867	2.284	2.097	1.69

0.870967741935484	5.125	4.219	2.441	2.163	2.032	1.658

0.903225806451613	4.91	4.144	2.425	2.111	1.749	1.317

0.935483870967742	4.347	3.084	1.784	1.564	1.555	0.8346

0.967741935483871	1.779	1.197	0.5114	0.3661	0.2586	0.07922

0.1		13.886	9.1148	4.7467	3.4885	3.3846	2.8181

					Average of yearly averages:	2.319394

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: acequPAtomatoIRgr

Metfile:	w14751.dvf

PRZM scenario:	PAtomatoSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	acequinocyl

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	384.5	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	3.9e-5	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	1.268e-6	torr

Solubility	sol	0.067	mg/L

Kd	Kd	1067	mg/L

Koc	Koc		mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp	0	days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	0	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	0	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	0	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI	0	cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	.336	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	0.99	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.064	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	01-09	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	21	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1	apprate	0.336	kg/ha

Record 17:	FILTRA	

	IPSCND	3

	UPTKF	

Record 18:	PLVKRT	

	PLDKRT	

	FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of
entire run)

Acequinocyl applied to FL Tomato via ground application

stored as acequFLtomatoIRgr.out

Chemical: acequinocyl

PRZM environment: FLtomatoSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at
06:16:38

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w12844.dvf	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:22

Water segment concentrations (µg/L)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	0.855	0.471	0.1576	0.1257	0.1175	0.07271

1962	1.527	1.004	0.6013	0.4288	0.4265	0.2604

1963	3.229	2.043	0.9123	0.643	0.5727	0.4102

1964	3.418	2.54	1.348	1.145	1.109	0.8295

1965	4.884	3.282	1.945	1.317	1.152	0.9196

1966	5.541	3.894	2.129	1.763	1.68	1.208

1967	3.441	2.355	1.55	1.256	1.222	1.047

1968	6.169	4.401	3.121	2.282	2.072	1.41

1969	6.583	4.244	2.32	1.81	1.707	1.443

1970	4.007	2.815	2.098	1.681	1.551	1.305

1971	5.332	3.768	1.867	1.372	1.258	1.067

1972	7.007	4.343	2.57	2.18	2.173	1.5

1973	3.428	2.443	1.67	1.513	1.486	1.258

1974	5.076	3.162	1.692	1.319	1.306	1.132

1975	5.346	3.408	1.986	1.39	1.252	1.033

1976	8.853	6.256	2.6	1.753	1.658	1.246

1977	8.261	5.447	2.908	2.202	1.93	1.546

1978	7.068	4.539	2.513	1.985	1.796	1.545

1979	11.58	6.84	3.077	2.3	2.03	1.631

1980	5.08	3.438	2.4	1.897	1.768	1.526

1981	6.514	4.355	2.202	1.846	1.758	1.312

1982	9.56	6.149	3.395	2.533	2.517	1.984

1983	6.744	4.514	3.084	2.31	2.272	2.012

1984	10.84	7.785	3.346	2.409	2.254	1.974

1985	4.533	3.642	2.559	2.108	2.049	1.682

1986	5.93	3.817	2.048	1.838	1.702	1.537

1987	6.063	4.1	2.344	2.041	1.829	1.472

1988	9.862	6.313	3.364	2.727	2.715	1.786

1989	4.668	3.281	1.878	1.474	1.417	1.266

1990	6.847	4.39	2.507	1.956	1.907	1.325

Sorted results

Prob.		Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	11.58	7.785	3.395	2.727	2.715	2.012

0.0645161290322581	10.84	6.84	3.364	2.533	2.517	1.984

0.0967741935483871	9.862	6.313	3.346	2.409	2.272	1.974

0.129032258064516	9.56	6.256	3.121	2.31	2.254	1.786

0.161290322580645	8.853	6.149	3.084	2.3	2.173	1.682

0.193548387096774	8.261	5.447	3.077	2.282	2.072	1.631

0.225806451612903	7.068	4.539	2.908	2.202	2.049	1.546

0.258064516129032	7.007	4.514	2.6	2.18	2.03	1.545

0.290322580645161	6.847	4.401	2.57	2.108	1.93	1.537

0.32258064516129	6.744	4.39	2.559	2.041	1.907	1.526

0.354838709677419	6.583	4.355	2.513	1.985	1.829	1.5

0.387096774193548	6.514	4.343	2.507	1.956	1.796	1.472

0.419354838709677	6.169	4.244	2.4	1.897	1.768	1.443

0.451612903225806	6.063	4.1	2.344	1.846	1.758	1.41

0.483870967741936	5.93	3.894	2.32	1.838	1.707	1.325

0.516129032258065	5.541	3.817	2.202	1.81	1.702	1.312

0.548387096774194	5.346	3.768	2.129	1.763	1.68	1.305

0.580645161290323	5.332	3.642	2.098	1.753	1.658	1.266

0.612903225806452	5.08	3.438	2.048	1.681	1.551	1.258

0.645161290322581	5.076	3.408	1.986	1.513	1.486	1.246

0.67741935483871	4.884	3.282	1.945	1.474	1.417	1.208

0.709677419354839	4.668	3.281	1.878	1.39	1.306	1.132

0.741935483870968	4.533	3.162	1.867	1.372	1.258	1.067

0.774193548387097	4.007	2.815	1.692	1.319	1.252	1.047

0.806451612903226	3.441	2.54	1.67	1.317	1.222	1.033

0.838709677419355	3.428	2.443	1.55	1.256	1.152	0.9196

0.870967741935484	3.418	2.355	1.348	1.145	1.109	0.8295

0.903225806451613	3.229	2.043	0.9123	0.643	0.5727	0.4102

0.935483870967742	1.527	1.004	0.6013	0.4288	0.4265	0.2604

0.967741935483871	0.855	0.471	0.1576	0.1257	0.1175	0.07271

0.1		9.8318	6.3073	3.3235	2.3991	2.2702	1.9552

					Average of yearly averages:	1.29131366666667

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: acequFLtomatoIRgr

Metfile:	w12844.dvf

PRZM scenario:	FLtomatoSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	acequinocyl

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	384.5	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	3.9e-5	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	1.268e-6	torr

Solubility	sol	0.067	mg/L

Kd	Kd	1067	mg/L

Koc	Koc		mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp	0	days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	0	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	0	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	0	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI	0	cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	.336	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	0.99	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.064	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	01-04	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	21	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1	apprate	0.336	kg/ha

Record 17:	FILTRA	

	IPSCND	3

	UPTKF	

Record 18:	PLVKRT	

	PLDKRT	

	FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of
entire run)

Acequinocyl applied to CA Tomato via ground application

stored as acequCAtomatoIRgr.out

Chemical: acequinocyl

PRZM environment: CAtomato_WirrigSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008
at 06:16:36

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w93193.dvf	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:16:12

Water segment concentrations (µg/L)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	0.7821	0.4661	0.1542	0.1124	0.08828	0.03182

1962	0.8405	0.5233	0.211	0.1701	0.1452	0.09456

1963	0.8787	0.5599	0.2478	0.2061	0.1821	0.1402

1964	0.8732	0.552	0.2404	0.1999	0.1745	0.1346

1965	0.907	0.589	0.2765	0.2352	0.2093	0.1684

1966	1.093	0.7625	0.3611	0.2295	0.2019	0.17

1967	0.9586	0.6468	0.3316	0.2865	0.2587	0.2187

1968	0.9329	0.6111	0.3044	0.2625	0.2468	0.2104

1969	2.527	1.639	0.9605	0.7394	0.6548	0.4668

1970	1.494	1.036	0.6386	0.5146	0.4743	0.4049

1971	1.039	0.7154	0.4019	0.3615	0.3348	0.3119

1972	0.983	0.6627	0.4117	0.3136	0.2827	0.2621

1973	1.14	0.7797	0.4298	0.3396	0.3165	0.2854

1974	0.9851	0.6651	0.3638	0.3106	0.2832	0.2616

1975	0.9672	0.6518	0.3366	0.2946	0.2666	0.227

1976	2.263	1.438	0.7086	0.4345	0.3805	0.3146

1977	1.043	0.7046	0.4234	0.3121	0.2845	0.2639

1978	2.051	1.576	0.7459	0.5693	0.5146	0.4098

1979	1.041	0.7181	0.4138	0.3816	0.3646	0.3155

1980	2.336	1.512	0.7288	0.5198	0.469	0.3631

1981	1.173	0.8086	0.4954	0.3831	0.3563	0.2998

1982	1.442	0.9798	0.486	0.4368	0.3869	0.3089

1983	2.098	1.403	1.009	0.7146	0.6373	0.4974

1984	1.075	0.7527	0.438	0.4087	0.3953	0.3563

1985	1.025	0.7051	0.3904	0.3508	0.3217	0.3034

1986	2.027	1.334	0.6561	0.51	0.4555	0.3835

1987	1.087	0.769	0.4608	0.4134	0.404	0.3597

1988	1.034	0.714	0.4289	0.358	0.3302	0.3105

1989	1.018	0.6968	0.3837	0.3454	0.3248	0.293

1990	1.331	0.9276	0.4819	0.3617	0.3302	0.2963

Sorted results

Prob.		Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	2.527	1.639	1.009	0.7394	0.6548	0.4974

0.0645161290322581	2.336	1.576	0.9605	0.7146	0.6373	0.4668

0.0967741935483871	2.263	1.512	0.7459	0.5693	0.5146	0.4098

0.129032258064516	2.098	1.438	0.7288	0.5198	0.4743	0.4049

0.161290322580645	2.051	1.403	0.7086	0.5146	0.469	0.3835

0.193548387096774	2.027	1.334	0.6561	0.51	0.4555	0.3631

0.225806451612903	1.494	1.036	0.6386	0.4368	0.404	0.3597

0.258064516129032	1.442	0.9798	0.4954	0.4345	0.3953	0.3563

0.290322580645161	1.331	0.9276	0.486	0.4134	0.3869	0.3155

0.32258064516129	1.173	0.8086	0.4819	0.4087	0.3805	0.3146

0.354838709677419	1.14	0.7797	0.4608	0.3831	0.3646	0.3119

0.387096774193548	1.093	0.769	0.438	0.3816	0.3563	0.3105

0.419354838709677	1.087	0.7625	0.4298	0.3617	0.3348	0.3089

0.451612903225806	1.075	0.7527	0.4289	0.3615	0.3302	0.3034

0.483870967741936	1.043	0.7181	0.4234	0.358	0.3302	0.2998

0.516129032258065	1.041	0.7154	0.4138	0.3508	0.3248	0.2963

0.548387096774194	1.039	0.714	0.4117	0.3454	0.3217	0.293

0.580645161290323	1.034	0.7051	0.4019	0.3396	0.3165	0.2854

0.612903225806452	1.025	0.7046	0.3904	0.3136	0.2845	0.2639

0.645161290322581	1.018	0.6968	0.3837	0.3121	0.2832	0.2621

0.67741935483871	0.9851	0.6651	0.3638	0.3106	0.2827	0.2616

0.709677419354839	0.983	0.6627	0.3611	0.2946	0.2666	0.227

0.741935483870968	0.9672	0.6518	0.3366	0.2865	0.2587	0.2187

0.774193548387097	0.9586	0.6468	0.3316	0.2625	0.2468	0.2104

0.806451612903226	0.9329	0.6111	0.3044	0.2352	0.2093	0.17

0.838709677419355	0.907	0.589	0.2765	0.2295	0.2019	0.1684

0.870967741935484	0.8787	0.5599	0.2478	0.2061	0.1821	0.1402

0.903225806451613	0.8732	0.552	0.2404	0.1999	0.1745	0.1346

0.935483870967742	0.8405	0.5233	0.211	0.1701	0.1452	0.09456

0.967741935483871	0.7821	0.4661	0.1542	0.1124	0.08828	0.03182

0.1		2.2465	1.5046	0.74419	0.56435	0.51057	0.40931

					Average of yearly averages:	0.282136

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: acequCAtomatoIRgr

Metfile:	w93193.dvf

PRZM scenario:	CAtomato_WirrigSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	acequinocyl

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	384.5	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	3.9e-5	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	1.268e-6	torr

Solubility	sol	0.067	mg/L

Kd	Kd	1067	mg/L

Koc	Koc		mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp	0	days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	0	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	0	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	0	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI	0	cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	.336	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	0.99	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.064	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	21-07	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	21	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1	apprate	0.336	kg/ha

Record 17:	FILTRA	

	IPSCND	3

	UPTKF	

Record 18:	PLVKRT	

	PLDKRT	

	FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of
entire run)

Acequinocyl applied to MI Beans via ground application

stored as acequMIbeansIRgr.out

Chemical: acequinocyl

PRZM environment: MIbeansSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at
06:16:40

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w14826.dvf	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:15:04

Water segment concentrations (µg/L)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	0.9652	0.6287	0.4439	0.294	0.2688	0.1312

1962	3.416	2.119	0.9855	0.6962	0.6105	0.3975

1963	1.821	1.274	0.6912	0.5941	0.5602	0.4685

1964	4.525	2.846	1.394	1.194	1.078	0.7438

1965	3.508	2.319	1.186	0.9836	0.9597	0.8528

1966	4.521	2.914	1.405	1.072	0.9939	0.8325

1967	3.851	2.591	1.633	1.282	1.212	1.036

1968	7.956	5.16	2.48	2.017	1.865	1.442

1969	5.785	4.002	2.507	1.987	1.968	1.699

1970	5.488	3.751	2.2	1.792	1.741	1.613

1971	4.324	2.981	1.882	1.726	1.693	1.49

1972	7.045	4.66	2.38	1.908	1.834	1.672

1973	3.626	2.933	2.201	2.026	1.931	1.707

1974	6.063	4.124	2.383	2.051	1.957	1.724

1975	9.841	7.465	4.25	2.847	2.575	2.081

1976	7.564	5.205	2.962	2.45	2.444	2.183

1977	3.965	3.276	2.131	2.074	1.977	1.761

1978	3.117	2.248	1.96	1.766	1.734	1.448

1979	6.938	4.603	2.415	1.761	1.599	1.351

1980	6.993	4.567	2.421	1.905	1.89	1.539

1981	5.654	4.433	2.52	2.183	2.038	1.777

1982	3.751	2.769	2.033	1.915	1.873	1.68

1983	6.115	4.109	2.27	1.871	1.841	1.611

1984	3.632	2.699	2.052	1.824	1.771	1.614

1985	8.186	5.852	3.702	2.655	2.402	1.951

1986	7.69	5.179	3.757	3.091	2.76	2.188

1987	5.665	4.209	2.599	2.394	2.254	1.999

1988	4.218	2.984	2.025	1.981	1.892	1.69

1989	6.054	4.605	2.649	2.311	2.213	1.884

1990	5.644	3.813	2.142	2.011	1.948	1.753

Sorted results

Prob.		Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	9.841	7.465	4.25	3.091	2.76	2.188

0.0645161290322581	8.186	5.852	3.757	2.847	2.575	2.183

0.0967741935483871	7.956	5.205	3.702	2.655	2.444	2.081

0.129032258064516	7.69	5.179	2.962	2.45	2.402	1.999

0.161290322580645	7.564	5.16	2.649	2.394	2.254	1.951

0.193548387096774	7.045	4.66	2.599	2.311	2.213	1.884

0.225806451612903	6.993	4.605	2.52	2.183	2.038	1.777

0.258064516129032	6.938	4.603	2.507	2.074	1.977	1.761

0.290322580645161	6.115	4.567	2.48	2.051	1.968	1.753

0.32258064516129	6.063	4.433	2.421	2.026	1.957	1.724

0.354838709677419	6.054	4.209	2.415	2.017	1.948	1.707

0.387096774193548	5.785	4.124	2.383	2.011	1.931	1.699

0.419354838709677	5.665	4.109	2.38	1.987	1.892	1.69

0.451612903225806	5.654	4.002	2.27	1.981	1.89	1.68

0.483870967741936	5.644	3.813	2.201	1.915	1.873	1.672

0.516129032258065	5.488	3.751	2.2	1.908	1.865	1.614

0.548387096774194	4.525	3.276	2.142	1.905	1.841	1.613

0.580645161290323	4.521	2.984	2.131	1.871	1.834	1.611

0.612903225806452	4.324	2.981	2.052	1.824	1.771	1.539

0.645161290322581	4.218	2.933	2.033	1.792	1.741	1.49

0.67741935483871	3.965	2.914	2.025	1.766	1.734	1.448

0.709677419354839	3.851	2.846	1.96	1.761	1.693	1.442

0.741935483870968	3.751	2.769	1.882	1.726	1.599	1.351

0.774193548387097	3.632	2.699	1.633	1.282	1.212	1.036

0.806451612903226	3.626	2.591	1.405	1.194	1.078	0.8528

0.838709677419355	3.508	2.319	1.394	1.072	0.9939	0.8325

0.870967741935484	3.416	2.248	1.186	0.9836	0.9597	0.7438

0.903225806451613	3.117	2.119	0.9855	0.6962	0.6105	0.4685

0.935483870967742	1.821	1.274	0.6912	0.5941	0.5602	0.3975

0.967741935483871	0.9652	0.6287	0.4439	0.294	0.2688	0.1312

0.1		7.9294	5.2024	3.628	2.6345	2.4398	2.0728

					Average of yearly averages:	1.47731

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: acequMIbeansIRgr

Metfile:	w14826.dvf

PRZM scenario:	MIbeansSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	acequinocyl

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	384.5	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	3.9e-5	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	1.268e-6	torr

Solubility	sol	0.067	mg/L

Kd	Kd	1067	mg/L

Koc	Koc		mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp	0	days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	0	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	0	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	0	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI	0	cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	.336	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	0.99	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.064	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	08-06	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	21	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1	apprate	0.336	kg/ha

Record 17:	FILTRA	

	IPSCND	3

	UPTKF	

Record 18:	PLVKRT	

	PLDKRT	

	FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of
entire run)

Acequinocyl applied to OR Snap Beans via ground application

stored as acequORspbeansIRgr.out

Chemical: acequinocyl

PRZM environment: ORsnbeansSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at
06:16:42

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w14826.dvf	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:15:04

Water segment concentrations (µg/L)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	1.069	0.6743	0.4521	0.3027	0.2801	0.1199

1962	2.216	1.443	0.8331	0.6384	0.5733	0.4282

1963	1.951	1.304	0.7539	0.658	0.6397	0.5304

1964	3.833	2.503	1.375	1.126	1.033	0.8109

1965	4.18	2.785	1.526	1.314	1.233	1.077

1966	3.803	2.592	1.535	1.232	1.155	1.056

1967	6.049	3.938	2.093	1.692	1.634	1.429

1968	8.092	5.359	2.735	2.183	2.071	1.825

1969	6.236	4.328	2.583	2.261	2.225	2.004

1970	4.12	3.022	2.038	1.998	1.976	1.806

1971	6.124	4.091	2.278	2.061	1.985	1.689

1972	6.393	4.393	2.557	2.162	2.122	2.025

1973	4.728	3.684	2.767	2.498	2.41	2.121

1974	6.289	4.477	3.005	2.739	2.615	2.224

1975	10.05	7.524	4.533	3.173	2.905	2.536

1976	6.248	4.538	3.282	2.942	2.821	2.505

1977	3.603	2.841	2.411	2.355	2.261	2.001

1978	4.229	3.083	2.501	2.124	2.06	1.721

1979	4.88	3.49	2.196	1.871	1.853	1.58

1980	5.342	3.756	2.527	1.949	2.02	1.797

1981	7.392	5.718	3.118	2.591	2.421	2.096

1982	4.813	3.527	2.41	2.333	2.294	2.032

1983	5.695	4.249	2.43	2.088	2.044	1.917

1984	4.694	3.707	2.636	2.264	2.174	1.915	

1985	10.4	7.744	4.294	3.218	2.958	2.521

1986	8.279	6.263	4.481	3.608	3.249	2.652

1987	5.987	4.532	2.914	2.895	2.723	2.354

1988	5.471	3.783	2.5	2.334	2.24	1.975

1989	6.643	5.069	2.869	2.419	2.328	2.107

1990	6.741	4.554	2.522	2.398	2.33	2.023

Sorted results

Prob.		Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	10.4	7.744	4.533	3.608	3.249	2.652

0.0645161290322581	10.05	7.524	4.481	3.218	2.958	2.536

0.0967741935483871	8.279	6.263	4.294	3.173	2.905	2.521

0.129032258064516	8.092	5.718	3.282	2.942	2.821	2.505

0.161290322580645	7.392	5.359	3.118	2.895	2.723	2.354

0.193548387096774	6.741	5.069	3.005	2.739	2.615	2.224

0.225806451612903	6.643	4.554	2.914	2.591	2.421	2.121

0.258064516129032	6.393	4.538	2.869	2.498	2.41	2.107

0.290322580645161	6.289	4.532	2.767	2.419	2.33	2.096

0.32258064516129	6.248	4.477	2.735	2.398	2.328	2.032

0.354838709677419	6.236	4.393	2.636	2.355	2.294	2.025

0.387096774193548	6.124	4.328	2.583	2.334	2.261	2.023

0.419354838709677	6.049	4.249	2.557	2.333	2.24	2.004

0.451612903225806	5.987	4.091	2.527	2.264	2.225	2.001

0.483870967741936	5.695	3.938	2.522	2.261	2.174	1.975

0.516129032258065	5.471	3.783	2.501	2.183	2.122	1.917

0.548387096774194	5.342	3.756	2.5	2.162	2.071	1.915

0.580645161290323	4.88	3.707	2.43	2.124	2.06	1.825

0.612903225806452	4.813	3.684	2.411	2.088	2.044	1.806

0.645161290322581	4.728	3.527	2.41	2.061	2.02	1.797

0.67741935483871	4.694	3.49	2.278	1.998	1.985	1.721

0.709677419354839	4.229	3.083	2.196	1.949	1.976	1.689

0.741935483870968	4.18	3.022	2.093	1.871	1.853	1.58

0.774193548387097	4.12	2.841	2.038	1.692	1.634	1.429

0.806451612903226	3.833	2.785	1.535	1.314	1.233	1.077

0.838709677419355	3.803	2.592	1.526	1.232	1.155	1.056

0.870967741935484	3.603	2.503	1.375	1.126	1.033	0.8109

0.903225806451613	2.216	1.443	0.8331	0.658	0.6397	0.5304

0.935483870967742	1.951	1.304	0.7539	0.6384	0.5733	0.4282

0.967741935483871	1.069	0.6743	0.4521	0.3027	0.2801	0.1199

0.1		8.2603	6.2085	4.1928	3.1499	2.8966	2.5194

					Average of yearly averages:	1.76258

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: acequORspbeansIRgr

Metfile:	w14826.dvf

PRZM scenario:	ORsnbeansSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	acequinocyl

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	384.5	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	3.9e-5	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	1.268e-6	torr

Solubility	sol	0.067	mg/L

Kd	Kd	1067	mg/L

Koc	Koc		mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp	0	days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	0	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	0	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	0	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI	0	cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	.336	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	0.99	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.064	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	22-06	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	21	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1	apprate	0.336	kg/ha

Record 17:	FILTRA	

	IPSCND	3

	UPTKF	

Record 18:	PLVKRT	

	PLDKRT	

	FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of
entire run)

Acequinocyl applied to OR Hops via ground application

stored as acequORhopsIRgr.out

Chemical: acequinocyl

PRZM environment: ORhopsSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at
06:16:42

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w24232.dvf	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:15:54

Water segment concentrations (µg/L)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	2.078	1.269	0.4862	0.2545	0.2022	0.08444

1962	4.094	2.574	1.193	0.8098	0.7491	0.442

1963	3.374	2.626	1.505	1.299	1.193	0.9813

1964	7.296	5.412	2.338	1.533	1.3	1.109

1965	4.669	3.443	1.886	1.573	1.525	1.339

1966	4.522	3.292	1.899	1.579	1.585	1.383

1967	5.08	3.517	1.992	1.596	1.528	1.324

1968	4.504	3.415	2.286	1.886	1.845	1.601

1969	4.42	3.218	2.246	1.953	1.815	1.626

1970	5.182	2.981	2.253	2.078	1.974	1.668

1971	4.277	3.1	2.029	1.775	1.718	1.644

1972	6.408	4.349	2.494	1.991	1.892	1.597

1973	7.372	4.901	3.067	2.383	1.965	1.516

1974	5.983	4.544	2.801	2.247	2.167	1.814

1975	3.989	2.905	1.968	1.763	1.722	1.555

1976	3.921	3.192	2.039	1.785	1.724	1.453

1977	5.463	4.097	2.517	1.876	1.56	1.152

1978	4.086	2.936	1.939	1.751	1.676	1.518

1979	4.619	3.235	2.173	1.953	1.825	1.572

1980	8.044	5.762	2.984	2.482	2.11	1.809

1981	5.28	3.856	2.797	2.487	2.433	2.018

1982	4.28	3.232	2.493	2.273	2.187	1.919

1983	4.175	3.378	2.585	2.309	2.226	1.907

1984	5.835	4.016	2.46	2.143	1.927	1.71

1985	3.341	2.5	1.805	1.757	1.711	1.544

1986	5.156	3.723	2.171	1.733	1.639	1.386

1987	8.766	6.211	3.519	2.103	1.811	1.546

1988	5.046	3.54	2.365	1.977	1.889	1.597

1989	9.203	6.023	2.808	1.95	1.709	1.442

1990	4.414	3.34	2.269	2.056	1.945	1.677

Sorted results

Prob.		Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	9.203	6.211	3.519	2.487	2.433	2.018

0.0645161290322581	8.766	6.023	3.067	2.482	2.226	1.919

0.0967741935483871	8.044	5.762	2.984	2.383	2.187	1.907

0.129032258064516	7.372	5.412	2.808	2.309	2.167	1.814

0.161290322580645	7.296	4.901	2.801	2.273	2.11	1.809

0.193548387096774	6.408	4.544	2.797	2.247	1.974	1.71

0.225806451612903	5.983	4.349	2.585	2.143	1.965	1.677

0.258064516129032	5.835	4.097	2.517	2.103	1.945	1.668

0.290322580645161	5.463	4.016	2.494	2.078	1.927	1.644

0.32258064516129	5.28	3.856	2.493	2.056	1.892	1.626

0.354838709677419	5.182	3.723	2.46	1.991	1.889	1.601

0.387096774193548	5.156	3.54	2.365	1.977	1.845	1.597

0.419354838709677	5.08	3.517	2.338	1.953	1.825	1.597

0.451612903225806	5.046	3.443	2.286	1.953	1.815	1.572

0.483870967741936	4.669	3.415	2.269	1.95	1.811	1.555

0.516129032258065	4.619	3.378	2.253	1.886	1.724	1.546

0.548387096774194	4.522	3.34	2.246	1.876	1.722	1.544

0.580645161290323	4.504	3.292	2.173	1.785	1.718	1.518

0.612903225806452	4.42	3.235	2.171	1.775	1.711	1.516

0.645161290322581	4.414	3.232	2.039	1.763	1.709	1.453

0.67741935483871	4.28	3.218	2.029	1.757	1.676	1.442

0.709677419354839	4.277	3.192	1.992	1.751	1.639	1.386

0.741935483870968	4.175	3.1	1.968	1.733	1.585	1.383

0.774193548387097	4.094	2.981	1.939	1.596	1.56	1.339

0.806451612903226	4.086	2.936	1.899	1.579	1.528	1.324

0.838709677419355	3.989	2.905	1.886	1.573	1.525	1.152

0.870967741935484	3.921	2.626	1.805	1.533	1.3	1.109

0.903225806451613	3.374	2.574	1.505	1.299	1.193	0.9813

0.935483870967742	3.341	2.5	1.193	0.8098	0.7491	0.442

0.967741935483871	2.078	1.269	0.4862	0.2545	0.2022	0.08444

0.1		7.9768	5.727	2.9664	2.3756	2.185	1.8977

					Average of yearly averages:	1.464458

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: acequORhopsIRgr

Metfile:	w24232.dvf

PRZM scenario:	ORhopsSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	acequinocyl

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	384.5	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	3.9e-5	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	1.268e-6	torr

Solubility	sol	0.067	mg/L

Kd	Kd	1067	mg/L

Koc	Koc		mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp	0	days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	0	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	0	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	0	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI	0	cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	.336	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	0.99	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.064	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	07-04	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	21	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1	apprate	0.336	kg/ha

Record 17:	FILTRA	

	IPSCND	3

	UPTKF	

Record 18:	PLVKRT	

	PLDKRT	

	FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of
entire run)

Acequinocyl applied to FL Peppers via ground application

stored as acequFLpeppersIRgr.out

Chemical: acequinocyl

PRZM environment: FLpeppersSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at
06:16:38

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w12844.dvf	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:22

Water segment concentrations (µg/L)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	0.7965	0.4555	0.155	0.1165	0.08548	0.02108

1962	0.9524	0.6123	0.3306	0.3029	0.2689	0.1745

1963	2.724	1.741	0.8963	0.618	0.5516	0.3388

1964	2.877	1.984	1.242	1.138	1.044	0.7797

1965	5.873	3.673	2.099	1.432	1.229	0.8839

1966	4.288	3.092	1.796	1.522	1.464	1.168

1967	3.102	2.112	1.352	1.163	1.109	0.9818

1968	5.139	3.681	2.641	1.959	1.787	1.267

1969	5.569	3.64	2.05	1.629	1.543	1.35

1970	4.578	3.011	2.111	1.582	1.519	1.316

1971	6.711	4.46	2.051	1.392	1.253	1.037

1972	7.569	4.822	2.435	2.092	2.066	1.507

1973	3.161	2.292	1.563	1.467	1.429	1.258

1974	5.587	3.98	2.038	1.41	1.329	1.187

1975	4.826	3.102	1.768	1.335	1.199	1.006

1976	7.718	5.502	2.382	1.69	1.57	1.234

1977	8.361	4.993	2.68	2.125	1.861	1.526

1978	7.011	4.92	2.706	1.975	1.823	1.565

1979	10.54	6.278	2.677	2.09	1.876	1.579

1980	4.869	3.299	2.199	1.78	1.67	1.497

1981	6.731	4.23	2.116	1.712	1.719	1.28

1982	11.62	7.107	3.61	2.547	2.645	2.072

1983	7.687	5.354	2.955	2.502	2.313	2.108

1984	12.65	8.892	3.707	2.515	2.289	2.025

1985	4.473	3.473	2.497	2.084	2.002	1.73

1986	7.341	4.635	2.331	1.903	1.805	1.613

1987	6.183	4.426	2.265	2.038	1.843	1.566

1988	9.344	5.989	3.101	2.513	2.527	1.756

1989	5.562	3.896	1.938	1.46	1.401	1.244

1990	6.394	4.102	2.268	1.832	1.774	1.268

Sorted results

Prob.		Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	12.65	8.892	3.707	2.547	2.645	2.108

0.0645161290322581	11.62	7.107	3.61	2.515	2.527	2.072

0.0967741935483871	10.54	6.278	3.101	2.513	2.313	2.025

0.129032258064516	9.344	5.989	2.955	2.502	2.289	1.756

0.161290322580645	8.361	5.502	2.706	2.125	2.066	1.73

0.193548387096774	7.718	5.354	2.68	2.092	2.002	1.613

0.225806451612903	7.687	4.993	2.677	2.09	1.876	1.579

0.258064516129032	7.569	4.92	2.641	2.084	1.861	1.566

0.290322580645161	7.341	4.822	2.497	2.038	1.843	1.565

0.32258064516129	7.011	4.635	2.435	1.975	1.823	1.526

0.354838709677419	6.731	4.46	2.382	1.959	1.805	1.507

0.387096774193548	6.711	4.426	2.331	1.903	1.787	1.497

0.419354838709677	6.394	4.23	2.268	1.832	1.774	1.35

0.451612903225806	6.183	4.102	2.265	1.78	1.719	1.316

0.483870967741936	5.873	3.98	2.199	1.712	1.67	1.28

0.516129032258065	5.587	3.896	2.116	1.69	1.57	1.268

0.548387096774194	5.569	3.681	2.111	1.629	1.543	1.267

0.580645161290323	5.562	3.673	2.099	1.582	1.519	1.258

0.612903225806452	5.139	3.64	2.051	1.522	1.464	1.244

0.645161290322581	4.869	3.473	2.05	1.467	1.429	1.234

0.67741935483871	4.826	3.299	2.038	1.46	1.401	1.187

0.709677419354839	4.578	3.102	1.938	1.432	1.329	1.168

0.741935483870968	4.473	3.092	1.796	1.41	1.253	1.037

0.774193548387097	4.288	3.011	1.768	1.392	1.229	1.006

0.806451612903226	3.161	2.292	1.563	1.335	1.199	0.9818

0.838709677419355	3.102	2.112	1.352	1.163	1.109	0.8839

0.870967741935484	2.877	1.984	1.242	1.138	1.044	0.7797

0.903225806451613	2.724	1.741	0.8963	0.618	0.5516	0.3388

0.935483870967742	0.9524	0.6123	0.3306	0.3029	0.2689	0.1745

0.967741935483871	0.7965	0.4555	0.155	0.1165	0.08548	0.02108

0.1		10.4204	6.2491	3.0864	2.5119	2.3106	1.9981

					Average of yearly averages:	1.27795933333333

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: acequFLpeppersIRgr

Metfile:	w12844.dvf

PRZM scenario:	FLpeppersSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	acequinocyl

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	384.5	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	3.9e-5	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	1.268e-6	torr

Solubility	sol	0.067	mg/L

Kd	Kd	1067	mg/L

Koc	Koc		mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp	0	days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	0	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	0	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	0	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI	0	cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	.336	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	0.99	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.064	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	15-10	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	21	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1	apprate	0.336	kg/ha

Record 17:	FILTRA	

	IPSCND	3

	UPTKF	

Record 18:	PLVKRT	

	PLDKRT	

	FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of
entire run)

Acequinocyl applied to GA Pecans via air blast application (Method
Approach 2)

stored as acyquGApecanIRab.out

Chemical: acequinocyl

PRZM environment: GAPecansSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at
06:16:38

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w93805.dvf	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:16:18

Water segment concentrations (µg/L)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	0.7622	0.4012	0.1237	0.0861	0.07808	0.03735

1962	1.061	0.5674	0.198	0.1296	0.1183	0.0602

1963	0.9167	0.5137	0.2514	0.1693	0.1602	0.0823

1964	2.616	1.439	0.5505	0.366	0.319	0.1606

1965	6.254	3.403	1.179	0.6728	0.5567	0.2552

1966	2.93	1.595	0.6343	0.3722	0.3311	0.1943

1967	0.8221	0.4634	0.222	0.1667	0.143	0.1049

1968	1.001	0.5568	0.196	0.132	0.1195	0.08104

1969	1.373	0.818	0.3989	0.2361	0.2304	0.1267

1970	2.305	1.281	0.4613	0.2755	0.2479	0.1401

1971	1.013	0.6565	0.2944	0.2302	0.2033	0.1157

1972	6.148	3.278	1.07	0.559	0.4565	0.2034

1973	2.026	1.111	0.4863	0.3175	0.2783	0.1581

1974	0.8282	0.4688	0.2061	0.1702	0.1609	0.1063

1975	1.463	0.9273	0.3679	0.2493	0.2598	0.136

1976	0.8452	0.5073	0.3037	0.2278	0.1945	0.12

1977	0.8232	0.4616	0.2207	0.157	0.1571	0.09354

1978	1.099	0.6155	0.2458	0.1922	0.1701	0.08882

1979	1.088	0.7344	0.3482	0.2233	0.1935	0.1075

1980	1.205	0.7463	0.277	0.1861	0.1705	0.0999

1981	0.801	0.4409	0.1812	0.1323	0.1074	0.0681

1982	6.094	3.311	1.053	0.5694	0.4616	0.1895

1983	0.8984	0.5215	0.3236	0.2161	0.1781	0.1165

1984	1.086	0.6446	0.2323	0.1861	0.1581	0.08407

1985	4.224	2.285	0.7316	0.4079	0.3344	0.1528

1986	3.589	1.956	0.6811	0.4102	0.3541	0.1824

1987	3.489	2.104	0.8553	0.4642	0.3963	0.1959

1988	0.8265	0.466	0.1754	0.1448	0.128	0.09675

1989	3.528	1.944	0.7999	0.4575	0.3717	0.1632

1990	1.769	0.9798	0.3943	0.2326	0.2003	0.1177

Sorted results

Prob.		Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	6.254	3.403	1.179	0.6728	0.5567	0.2552

0.0645161290322581	6.148	3.311	1.07	0.5694	0.4616	0.2034

0.0967741935483871	6.094	3.278	1.053	0.559	0.4565	0.1959

0.129032258064516	4.224	2.285	0.8553	0.4642	0.3963	0.1943

0.161290322580645	3.589	2.104	0.7999	0.4575	0.3717	0.1895

0.193548387096774	3.528	1.956	0.7316	0.4102	0.3541	0.1824

0.225806451612903	3.489	1.944	0.6811	0.4079	0.3344	0.1632

0.258064516129032	2.93	1.595	0.6343	0.3722	0.3311	0.1606

0.290322580645161	2.616	1.439	0.5505	0.366	0.319	0.1581

0.32258064516129	2.305	1.281	0.4863	0.3175	0.2783	0.1528

0.354838709677419	2.026	1.111	0.4613	0.2755	0.2598	0.1401

0.387096774193548	1.769	0.9798	0.3989	0.2493	0.2479	0.136

0.419354838709677	1.463	0.9273	0.3943	0.2361	0.2304	0.1267

0.451612903225806	1.373	0.818	0.3679	0.2326	0.2033	0.12

0.483870967741936	1.205	0.7463	0.3482	0.2302	0.2003	0.1177

0.516129032258065	1.099	0.7344	0.3236	0.2278	0.1945	0.1165

0.548387096774194	1.088	0.6565	0.3037	0.2233	0.1935	0.1157

0.580645161290323	1.086	0.6446	0.2944	0.2161	0.1781	0.1075

0.612903225806452	1.061	0.6155	0.277	0.1922	0.1705	0.1063

0.645161290322581	1.013	0.5674	0.2514	0.1861	0.1701	0.1049

0.67741935483871	1.001	0.5568	0.2458	0.1861	0.1609	0.0999

0.709677419354839	0.9167	0.5215	0.2323	0.1702	0.1602	0.09675

0.741935483870968	0.8984	0.5137	0.222	0.1693	0.1581	0.09354

0.774193548387097	0.8452	0.5073	0.2207	0.1667	0.1571	0.08882

0.806451612903226	0.8282	0.4688	0.2061	0.157	0.143	0.08407

0.838709677419355	0.8265	0.466	0.198	0.1448	0.128	0.0823

0.870967741935484	0.8232	0.4634	0.196	0.1323	0.1195	0.08104

0.903225806451613	0.8221	0.4616	0.1812	0.132	0.1183	0.0681

0.935483870967742	0.801	0.4409	0.1754	0.1296	0.1074	0.0602

0.967741935483871	0.7622	0.4012	0.1237	0.0861	0.07808	0.03735

0.1		5.907	3.1787	1.03323	0.54952	0.45048	0.19574

					Average of yearly averages:	0.127962333333333

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: acyquGApecanIRab

Metfile:	w93805.dvf

PRZM scenario:	GAPecansSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	acequinocyl

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	384.5	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	3.9e-5	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	1.268e-6	torr

Solubility	sol	0.067	mg/L

Kd	Kd	970	mg/L

Koc	Koc		mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp	0.19	days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	97	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	649.8	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	48.5	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7	9.6	days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI	0	cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	.336	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	0.99	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.063	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	24-05	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	21	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1	apprate	0.336	kg/ha

Record 17:	FILTRA	

	IPSCND	3

	UPTKF	

Record 18:	PLVKRT	

	PLDKRT	

	FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of
entire run)

Acequinocyl applied to PA Tomato via ground application (Method Approach
2)

stored as acyquPAtomatoIRgr2.out

Chemical: acequinocyl

PRZM environment: PAtomatoSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at
06:16:42

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w14751.dvf	modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:15:00

Water segment concentrations (µg/L)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	0.776	0.4144	0.1664	0.1379	0.107	0.0372

1962	4.056	2.218	0.7164	0.5056	0.4655	0.1944

1963	2.835	1.575	0.5928	0.4671	0.3787	0.2474

1964	1.216	0.7084	0.3922	0.3442	0.3108	0.2172

1965	1.194	0.6816	0.3278	0.2323	0.2118	0.1559

1966	4.316	2.344	0.8795	0.4892	0.4403	0.2063

1967	2.506	1.4	0.6545	0.4217	0.3457	0.2234

1968	4.295	2.359	0.8745	0.5238	0.47	0.2558

1969	1.304	0.8341	0.4016	0.2767	0.2475	0.1978

1970	2.671	1.479	0.5438	0.3776	0.3141	0.1985

1971	2.307	1.302	0.6095	0.3388	0.2827	0.1946

1972	3.034	1.685	0.8792	0.5069	0.3722	0.223

1973	4.468	2.466	0.9281	0.5786	0.5058	0.2894

1974	3.504	2.297	0.836	0.5346	0.4522	0.294

1975	9.771	6.527	2.312	1.227	0.9986	0.4029

1976	6.677	3.706	1.426	0.8394	0.7443	0.447

1977	1.228	0.7703	0.5215	0.4977	0.4574	0.3436

1978	0.8842	0.5225	0.3584	0.3379	0.3128	0.2147

1979	2.2	1.452	0.7221	0.4996	0.4299	0.2498

1980	4.031	2.21	0.7247	0.5328	0.4082	0.2217

1981	2.638	1.573	0.5853	0.3445	0.2932	0.228

1982	1.645	0.9413	0.3597	0.2628	0.2391	0.1889

1983	2.127	1.21	0.5899	0.4731	0.412	0.2008

1984	1.354	0.7918	0.3451	0.3086	0.2861	0.2162

1985	3.08	1.711	0.6328	0.4014	0.3731	0.2025

1986	1.417	0.8366	0.394	0.3226	0.2526	0.1962

1987	2.426	1.365	0.8803	0.5302	0.5145	0.2666

1988	1.928	1.111	0.4387	0.3427	0.3122	0.2374

1989	4.601	2.983	1.043	0.5885	0.4689	0.2315

1990	3.979	2.216	0.8591	0.5564	0.4654	0.2698

Sorted results

Prob.		Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	9.771	6.527	2.312	1.227	0.9986	0.447

0.0645161290322581	6.677	3.706	1.426	0.8394	0.7443	0.4029

0.0967741935483871	4.601	2.983	1.043	0.5885	0.5145	0.3436

0.129032258064516	4.468	2.466	0.9281	0.5786	0.5058	0.294

0.161290322580645	4.316	2.359	0.8803	0.5564	0.47	0.2894

0.193548387096774	4.295	2.344	0.8795	0.5346	0.4689	0.2698

0.225806451612903	4.056	2.297	0.8792	0.5328	0.4655	0.2666

0.258064516129032	4.031	2.218	0.8745	0.5302	0.4654	0.2558

0.290322580645161	3.979	2.216	0.8591	0.5238	0.4574	0.2498

0.32258064516129	3.504	2.21	0.836	0.5069	0.4522	0.2474

0.354838709677419	3.08	1.711	0.7247	0.5056	0.4403	0.2374

0.387096774193548	3.034	1.685	0.7221	0.4996	0.4299	0.2315

0.419354838709677	2.835	1.575	0.7164	0.4977	0.412	0.228

0.451612903225806	2.671	1.573	0.6545	0.4892	0.4082	0.2234

0.483870967741936	2.638	1.479	0.6328	0.4731	0.3787	0.223

0.516129032258065	2.506	1.452	0.6095	0.4671	0.3731	0.2217

0.548387096774194	2.426	1.4	0.5928	0.4217	0.3722	0.2172

0.580645161290323	2.307	1.365	0.5899	0.4014	0.3457	0.2162

0.612903225806452	2.2	1.302	0.5853	0.3776	0.3141	0.2147

0.645161290322581	2.127	1.21	0.5438	0.3445	0.3128	0.2063

0.67741935483871	1.928	1.111	0.5215	0.3442	0.3122	0.2025

0.709677419354839	1.645	0.9413	0.4387	0.3427	0.3108	0.2008

0.741935483870968	1.417	0.8366	0.4016	0.3388	0.2932	0.1985

0.774193548387097	1.354	0.8341	0.394	0.3379	0.2861	0.1978

0.806451612903226	1.304	0.7918	0.3922	0.3226	0.2827	0.1962

0.838709677419355	1.228	0.7703	0.3597	0.3086	0.2526	0.1946

0.870967741935484	1.216	0.7084	0.3584	0.2767	0.2475	0.1944

0.903225806451613	1.194	0.6816	0.3451	0.2628	0.2391	0.1889

0.935483870967742	0.8842	0.5225	0.3278	0.2323	0.2118	0.1559

0.967741935483871	0.776	0.4144	0.1664	0.1379	0.107	0.0372

0.1		4.5877	2.9313	1.03151	0.58751	0.51363	0.33864

					Average of yearly averages:	0.235083333333333

Inputs generated by pe5.pl - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run:

Output File: acyquPAtomatoIRgr2

Metfile:	w14751.dvf

	

 

	

:

;

_

„

 

É

ù

ú

û

 

9

:

;

@

`

m

v

}

„

…

™

Ÿ

 

¢

ù

ú

û

1

2

>

Q

a

„

£

§

À

Í

h

h

-Í

Ñ

Ø

Þ

ß

è

 h*

 h*

h*

h*

h*

h*

	@

	@

퀀ࠂ䀇

 h

	@

	@

퀀ࠂ䀇

  hz

	@

	@

há

h

 hñ

hº

hº

hº

hº

hº

hº

hº

hº

h±

h±

摧ⶭR

摧ⶭR

摧ⶭR

摧ⶭR

摧ⶭR

摧ⶭR

摧ⶭR

摧ⶭR

摧ⶭR

摧΂J

h}

۠\

将

h}

h}

将

将

将

将

将

将

将

将

将

将

将

将

将

将

将

将

将

将

 h

  hz

„@

„Ð^„@

 hð

 hð

hð

 hð

 hð

hð

@

hz

-

6

S

g

„

¦

Á

ð

#

N

p

–

µ

×

hz

PRZM scenario:	PAtomatoSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	acequinocyl

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	384.5	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	3.9e-5	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	1.268e-6	torr

Solubility	sol	0.067	mg/L

Kd	Kd	970	mg/L

Koc	Koc		mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp	0.19	days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	97	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	649.8	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	48.5	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7	9.6	days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI	0	cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	.336	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	0.99	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.064	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	01-09	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	21	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate 1	apprate	0.336	kg/ha

Record 17:	FILTRA	

	IPSCND	3

	UPTKF	

Record 18:	PLVKRT	

	PLDKRT	

	FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of
entire run)

APPENDIX III

Acequinocyl Data Requirements tc \l1 "VII. Data Requirements 

Table 3.1: Environmental Fate and Transport Data Submitted for
Acequinocyl

Guideline #	

Laboratory and Field Studies	

MRID #’s	

Study Classification

161-1	

Hydrolysis (dark; pH 5, 7, and 9)	

45434908	

Supplemental

161-2	

Photodegradation in Water (pH 7)	

45434909	

Supplemental

161-3	

Photodegradation on Soil	

45434910	

Supplemental

162-1	

Aerobic Soil Metabolism

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	

45434911

45434912	

Supplemental

Unacceptable

162-3	

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	

45434913	

Supplemental

162-4	

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	

45434914	

Supplemental

163-1	

Adsorption/Desorption (Technical)

Adsorption/Desorption (Metabolite, R1)

Leaching in Unaged and Aged Soil Columns	

45531902

45434907

45531903	

Supplemental

Supplemental

Supplemental

164-1	

Terrestrial Field Dissipation	

45651601	

Acceptable

165-4	

Accumulation in Fish	45434923	Supplemental

 PAGE   

 PAGE   11