Document ID: FERC-2006-0418-0001
Agency: ferc
Document Type: Notice
Title: Electric rate and corporate regulation combined filings
Posted Date: 2006-03-08T05:00Z

[Federal Register: March 8, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 45)]
[Notices]               
[Page 11602-11603]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08mr06-61]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. EC06-86-000, et al.]

 
Mirant Corporation and Its Public Utility Subsidiaries, et al.; 
Electric Rate and Corporate Filings

March 1, 2006.
    The following filings have been made with the Commission. The 
filings are listed in ascending order within each docket 
classification.

1. Mirant Corporation and Its Public Utility Subsidiaries

[Docket No. EC06-86-000]

    Take notice that on February 24, 2006, Mirant Corporation (Mirant) 
and its public utility subsidiaries (collectively, Applicants), on 
their own behalf and on behalf of any future acquirer of voting equity 
interests in Mirant that meets the criteria set forth therein, filed 
with the Commission an application (Application) requesting that the 
Commission grant blanket authorization for any future disposition or 
issuance of voting equity interests in Mirant with a value in excess of 
$10 million to any party, provided that any such disposition or 
issuance would neither: (i) Result in the acquiring party, together 
with its affiliates, holding a 5% or greater voting equity interest in 
Mirant, nor (ii) confer upon the acquiring party, together with its 
affiliates, any right to control (positively or negatively) the 
management or operations of any Mirant Public Utility (Future 
Transactions). Applicant states that no future transaction will have 
any adverse effect on competition, rates or regulation or will result 
in the cross-subsidization of a non-utility associate company or the 
pledge or encumbrances of utility assets for the benefit of an 
associate company.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 17, 2006.

2. San Diego Gas & Electric Company v. Seller of Energy and Ancillary 
Services Into Markets Operated by the California Independent System 
Operator Corporation and the California Power Exchange; Investigation 
of Practices of the California Independent System Operator Corporation 
and the California Power Exchange

[Docket Nos. EL00-95-174 and EL00-98-160]

    Take notice that on February 10, 2006, Portland General Electric 
Company (Portland) filed testimony in support of revised cost recovery 
inputs to be used in Portland's cost recovery analysis, along with an 
updated version of the cost recovery template and supporting tables 
previously submitted in this proceeding in compliance with the 
Commission's Order issued January 26, 2006.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 13, 2006.

3. San Diego Gas & Electric Company v. Seller of Energy and Ancillary 
Services Into Markets Operated by the California Independent System 
Operator Corporation and the California Power Exchange; Investigation 
of Practices of the California Independent System Operator Corporation 
and the California Power Exchange

[Docket No. EL00-95-175, Docket No. EL00-98-161]

    Take notice that on February 10, 2006, Powerex Corp. (Powerex) 
pursuant to

[[Page 11603]]

Commission Order issued on January 26, 2006, filed a Cost Recovery 
Report.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 13, 2006.

4. Pinnacle West Capital Corporation

[Docket Nos. ER00-2268-005, ER00-2268-006, ER00-2268-007, EL05-10-000, 
ER99-4124-003, ER99-4124-004, ER99-4124-005, EL05-11-000, ER00-3312-
004, ER00-3312-005, ER00-3312-006, EL05-12-000, ER99-4122-006, ER99-
4122-007, ER99-4122-008, EL05-13-000]

    Take notice that on February 24, 2006, Pennacle West Capital 
Corporation, et al., brings additional authority in connection with it 
review of market-base rate authority and in particular use of a 
combined APS/SRP area as a relevant geographic market.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 8, 2006.

5. Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.; Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc.

[Docket No. PH06-5-000]

    Take notice that, on February 21, 2006, Hawaiian Electric 
Industries, Inc. (HEI) and Hawaiian Electric, Company, Inc. (HECO) 
jointly filed, on behalf of themselves and each of the holding 
companies in their holding company system Form 65B a petition seeking, 
pursuant to 18 CFR 366.3(c)(1) and 18 CFR 366.4(c)(1), a waiver of the 
Commission's regulations under the Public Utility Holding Company Act 
of 2005.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 14, 2006.

6. Broad Street Contract Services, Inc.

[Docket No. PH06-7-000]

    Take notice that on February 27, 2006, Broad Street Contract 
Services, Inc. (Broad Street) tendered for filing an Exemption 
Notification on behalf of itself and each of the holding companies in 
the same holding company system identified in FERC-65, seeking 
exemption from the requirements of the Public Utility Holding Company 
Act of 2005, 18 CFR 366.3(a) or 18 CFR 366.3(b).
    Broad Street states that the Holding Companies include one power 
marketer authorized to sell energy at market-based rates.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 20, 2006.

7. Mitsubishi Corporation; Diamond Generating Corporation; Diamond 
Frontier, LLC; Diamond Gateway, LLC; Diamond Georgia, LLC; Diamond 
Alabama, LLC; Diamond Washington, LLC; Diamond Oklahoma, LP; Diamond 
Alabama II, LLC; Wildflower Development LLC; Wildflower Generating 
Partners I LLC; Wildflower Energy, LP

[Docket No. PH06-9-000]

    Take notice that on February 23, 2006, Mitsubishi Corporation; 
Diamond Generating Corporation; Diamond Frontier, LLC; Diamond Gateway, 
LLC; Diamond Georgia, LLC; Diamond Alabama, LLC; Diamond Washington, 
LLC; Diamond Oklahoma, LP; Diamond Alabama II, LLC; Wildflower 
Development LLC; Wildflower Generating Partners, I LLC; and Wildflower 
Energy, LP (collectively, Mitsubishi Companies), filed an Exemption 
Notification (FERC-65) seeking exemption from the requirements of the 
Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005, 18 CFR 366.3(a) or 18 CFR 
366.3(b).
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 16, 2006.

8. Tennessee Valley Authority

[Docket No. TX05-1-007]

    Take notice that on February 21, 2006, Tennessee Valley Authority 
(TVA) filed a revised Transmission Impact Study Agreement, Facilities 
Study Agreement and an Interconnection Agreement with East Kentucky 
Power Cooperative, Inc. pursuant to the Commission's ``Final Order 
Directing Interconnection and Accepting Interconnection Agreement,'' 
issued January 19, 2006.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 14, 2006.

9. Louisiana Energy and Power Authority v. Entergy Services, Inc.; 
Louisiana Energy and Power Authority v. Cleco Power

[Docket No. TX06-1-000]

    Take notice that on February 17, 2006, Louisiana Energy and Power 
Authority (LEAP) hereby petitions, on behalf of itself and the Pool 
Members for which it operates a control area, the Commission to order 
Entergy Services, Inc. and Cleco Power to provide Network Integration 
Transmission Service under the respective Entergy and Cleco Open Access 
Transmission Tariffs that will enable LEPA to gain access to generation 
resources that are necessary to serve LEPA's load on a reasonable 
economic basis.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 10, 2006.

10. Aero Energy LLC

[Docket No. TX06-2-000]

    Take notice that on February 16, 2006, Aero Energy LLC (Aero 
Energy) filed an application for interconnection and transmission 
service on the Sagebrush Line pursuant to sections 210, 211 and 212 of 
the Federal Power Act. Aero Energy states that Sagebrush, a California 
general partnership, has refused Aero Energy access to the Sagebrush 
Line to interconnect with Southern California Edison Company's 
interstate transmission system.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 10, 2006.

Standard Paragraph

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 

TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-3185 Filed 3-7-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P