Document ID: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2002-0030-0011
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2003-03-07T05:00Z

i
Supporting
Statement
for
EPA
Information
Collection
Request
Number
1773.06
(
OMB
Control
Number
2050­
0171)

New
and
Amended
Reporting
and
Recordkeeping
Requirements
for
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
from
Hazardous
Waste
Combustors
January
2003
ii
Contents
1.
Identification
of
the
Information
Collection
1(
a)
Title
and
Number
of
the
Information
Collection
1(
b)
Short
Characterization/
Abstract
2.
Need
for
and
Use
of
the
Collection
2(
a)
Need
and
Authority
for
Collection
2(
b)
Practical
Utility
and
Users
of
the
Data
3.
Nonduplication,
Consultations,
and
Other
Collection
Criteria
3(
a)
Nonduplication
3(
b)
Public
Notice
Required
Prior
to
ICR
Submission
to
OMB
3(
c)
Consultations
3(
d)
Effects
of
Less
Frequent
Collection
3(
e)
General
Guidelines
3(
f)
Confidentiality
3(
g)
Sensitive
Questions
4.
Respondents
and
Information
Collected
4(
a)
Respondents
and
NAICS
Codes
4(
b)
Information
Collected
5.
Information
Collected
 
Agency
Activities,
Collection
Methodology,
and
Information
Management
5(
a)
Agency
Activities
5(
b)
Collection
Methodology
and
Management
5(
c)
Small
Entity
Flexibility
5(
d)
Collection
Schedule
6.
Estimating
the
Burden
and
Cost
of
Collection
6(
a)
Respondent
Burden
6(
b)
Respondent
Cost
6(
c)
Agency
Burden
and
Cost
6(
d)
Respondent
Universe
and
Total
Burden
and
Costs
6(
e)
Bottom
Line
Burden
Hour
and
Cost
6(
f)
Reasons
for
Change
in
Burden
6(
g)
Burden
Statement
1
1.
IDENTIFICATION
OF
THE
INFORMATION
COLLECTION
1(
a).
TITLE
AND
NUMBER
OF
THE
INFORMATION
COLLECTION
This
Information
Collection
Request
(
ICR)
is
entitled
"
New
and
Amended
Reporting
and
Recordkeeping
Requirements
for
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
from
Hazardous
Waste
Combustors.."
The
EPA
ICR
Number
for
this
ICR
is
1773.06
(
OMB
Control
Number
2050­
0171).
It
covers
the
regulations
under
40
CFR
Part
63,
Subpart
EEE.

1(
b).
SHORT
CHARACTERIZATION/
ABSTRACT
The
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA)
finalized
a
rule
on
September
30,
1999
(
64
FR
52828)
establishing
Maximum
Achievable
Control
Technology
(
MACT)
standards
for
several
hazardous
air
pollutants
from
hazardous
waste
combustion
facilities,
specifically
hazardous
waste
incinerators,
and
hazardous
waste
burning
cement
kilns
(
CKs),
and
lightweight
aggregate
kilns
(
LWAKs),
(
hereinafter
referred
to
as
hazardous
waste
combustors
(
HWC));
and
codified
them
under
40
CFR
Part
63,
Subpart
EEE.
An
ICR
#
1773.02
was
approved
by
OMB
for
the
reporting
and
recordkeeping
burden
for
this
rule
under
control
#
2050­
0171.

A
number
of
parties,
representing
interests
of
the
regulated
sources
and
of
the
environmental
community,
sought
judicial
review
of
the
rule.
On
July
24,
2001,
the
U.
S.
Court
of
Appeals
for
the
District
of
Columbia
Circuit
vacated
the
challenged
portions
of
the
rule.
As
a
result
of
these
actions
(
and
a
few
other
technical
modifications
made
by
EPA
to
the
September
1999
rule),
an
"
Interim
Standards
Rule"
was
promulgated
on
February
13,
2002
to
temporarily
replace
the
vacated
standards
(
see
64
FR
6792
and
64
FR
6968),
until
revised
standards
are
promulgated
in
2005.
This
ICR
has
been
prepared
for
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
burden
on
HWCs
under
the
current
regulations
at
40
CFR
Part
63,
Subpart
EEE.

The
current
regulations
(
40
CFR
Part
63,
Subpart
EEE)
require
HWCs
to
perform
testing
and
monitoring
activities,
submit
various
reports
and
perform
recordkeeping
activities
in
order
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
emission
standards,
and
the
regulations.
Much
of
the
information
will
be
kept
on­
site
by
the
facilities;
and
some
information
is
to
be
submitted
to
the
EPA
or
the
delegated
state
agency.
The
facilities
and
EPA
will
use
the
data
to
ensure
compliance
with
MACT
standards.

In
summary,
we
have
estimated
in
this
ICR
that
119
facilities
are
covered
by
this
rule,
and
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
burden
on
them
would
be
151,339
hours
per
year,
with
an
additional
capital/
startup
and
O&
M
annualized
cost
of
$
3,925,726.
For
EPA,
there
will
be
a
paperwork
burden
of
9,943
hours
per
year
for
this
rule.

2.
NEED
FOR
AND
USE
OF
THE
COLLECTION
2
2(
a).
NEED
AND
AUTHORITY
FOR
THE
COLLECTION
The
EPA,
under
authority
of
Section
112
of
the
Clean
Air
Act
has
established
national
emissions
standards
for
hazardous
air
pollutants
from
hazardous
waste
burning
incinerators,
cement
kilns,
and
lightweight
aggregate
kilns.
The
main
purpose
of
the
Clean
Air
Act
is
to
protect
and
enhance
the
quality
of
the
nation's
air
resources,
and
to
promote
the
public
health
and
welfare
and
the
productive
capacity
of
the
population.
To
this
end,
Sections
112(
a)
and
(
d)
of
the
Clean
Air
Act
direct
EPA
to
set
standards
for
hazardous
air
pollutants.
The
records
and
reports
required
by
the
information
collection
are
used
to
show
compliance
with
the
standards.

2(
b).
PRACTICAL
UTILITY
AND
USERS
OF
THE
DATA
The
data
collected
for
HWC
system
operations
and
testing
is
used
by
facility
owners
and
operators,
and
EPA
or
the
implementing
agency.
Data
maintained
in
records
are
used
to
monitor
results
of
testing,
inspections,
and
the
operation
of
air
pollution
control
systems,
as
well
as
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
regulations.
Notifications
and
submitted
monitoring
data
are
used
by
EPA
or
the
implementing
agency
to
evaluate
construction
or
reconstruction
plans,
test
and
operating
plans,
test
results,
facility
operation,
and
whether
facilities
qualify
for
certain
exemptions
and
alternative
monitoring/
testing
methods.

3.
NONDUPLICATION,
CONSULTATIONS,
AND
OTHER
COLLECTION
CRITERIA
3(
a).
NONDUPLICATION
The
information
collections
covered
in
this
ICR
are
not
available
from
sources
other
than
the
respondents.
No
other
Federal
agency
collection
satisfies
the
statutory
requirements
of
Section
112
of
the
Clean
Air
Act.
None
of
this
information
is
duplicative
of
other
information
collected
by
other
EPA
offices
or
other
Federal
agencies.

3(
b).
PUBLIC
NOTICE
REOUIRED
PRIOR
TO
ICR
SUBMISSION
TO
OMB
In
compliance
with
the
Paperwork
Reduction
Act
of
1995
(
PRA),
EPA
issued
a
public
notice
in
the
Federal
Register
(
67
FR
66144­
147,
October
30,
2002)
prior
to
the
preparation
of
this
renewal
ICR
and
solicited
comments
for
60
days
to
evaluate
whether
the
proposed
collections
of
information
are
necessary
for
the
proper
performance
of
the
functions
of
the
Agency,
including
whether
the
information
will
have
practical
utility,
evaluate
the
accuracy
of
the
Agency's
estimates
of
the
burdens
for
reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements
of
the
proposed
collections
of
information;
to
enhance
the
quality,
utility,
and
clarity
of
the
information
to
be
collected;
and
to
minimize
the
burden
of
the
collection
of
information
on
those
who
are
to
respond,
including
through
the
use
of
appropriate
automated
or
electronic
collection
technologies
or
other
forms
of
information
technology,
e.
g.,
permitting
electronic
submission
of
responses.
No
public
comments
were
received
in
response
to
this
notice.
3
3(
c).
CONSULTATIONS
EPA
made
extensive
efforts
to
consult
with
the
regulated
community,
stakeholders,
general
public,
State
and
industry
officials,
and
appropriate
Federal
agencies
in
the
development
of
the
Interim
Standards
Rule,
and
the
consequent
burden
imposed
due
to
its
various
provisions.
Several
meetings
were
held
with
the
stakeholders,
through
their
trade
associations
(
such
as
the
Cement
Kiln
Recycling
Coalition,
Chemical
Manufacturers
Association,
Coalition
of
Responsible
Waste
Incineration,
and
American
Chemistry
Council).
Since
some
of
the
regulated
facilities
are
owned
by
other
agencies
of
the
federal
government
(
such
as
the
Department
of
Defense
and
the
Department
of
Energy),
EPA
also
held
similar
consultations
with
them
also.
Details
of
these
meetings
are
a
part
of
the
administrative
record
of
the
Interim
Standards
Rule
and
are
contained
in
the
rule
dockets.

3(
d).
EFFECTS
OF
LESS
FREQUENT
COLLECTION
EPA
has
carefully
considered
the
burden
imposed
upon
the
regulated
community
by
this
hazardous
waste
combustion
regulation
and
the
potential
environmental
consequences
of
such
collection
frequencies.
Consequently,
the
Agency
is
confident
that
the
activities
required
of
the
respondents
are
necessary,
and
to
the
extent
possible,
has
minimized
the
burden
imposed.
EPA
believes
that
if
the
minimal
requirements
specified
under
the
regulations
are
not
met,
EPA
will
be
unable
to
fulfill
its
Congressional
mandate
to
protect
public
health
and
the
environment.
Additionally,
efforts
were
made
to
integrate
monitoring,
compliance
testing,
and
recordkeeping
requirements
of
the
CAA
and
RCRA
so
that
the
facilities
are
able
to
avoid
the
burden
of
duplicate
submissions
under
two
potentially
different
regulatory
compliance
schemes.

3(
e).
GENERAL
GUIDELINES
This
ICR
adheres
to
the
guidelines
stated
in
the
Paperwork
Reduction
Act
of
1995,
OMB's
implementing
regulations,
EPA's
"
Information
Collection
Request
Handbook"
(
EPA,
February
1999)
and
other
applicable
OMB
guidance.
Under
the
HWC
regulations,
EPA
found
it
necessary
that
the
facilities
retain
records
for
five
years
to
ensure
proper
compliance
with
the
MACT
standards.
The
recordkeeping
burden
for
such
a
requirement
is
not
significant
and
has
been
included
in
the
burden
estimates.

3(
f).
CONFIDENTIALITY
Section
3007(
b)
of
RCRA
and
40
CFR
Part
2,
Subpart
B,
which
define
EPA's
general
policy
on
the
public
disclosure
of
information,
contain
provisions
for
confidentiality.
The
Agency
does
not
anticipate
that
businesses
will
assert
a
claim
of
confidentiality
covering
the
collection
requirements
of
this
ICR.
If
such
a
claim
is
made,
EPA
will
treat
the
information
in
accordance
with
the
confidentiality
regulations
cited
above.
EPA
also
has
ensured
that
this
information
collection
complies
with
the
Privacy
Act
of
1974
and
the
OMB
Circular
#
108.

3(
g).
SENSITIVE
QUESTIONS
4
No
questions
of
a
sensitive
nature
are
included
in
any
information
collection
requirements.

4.
RESPONDENTS
AND
THE
INFORMATION
COLLECTED
4(
a).
RESPONDENTS
AND
NAICS
CODES
The
following
is
a
list
of
North
American
Industry
Classification
System
(
NAICS)
codes
associated
with
the
facilities
most
likely
to
be
affected
by
the
information
collection
requirements
covered
by
this
ICR:

2123
Non­
metallic
Mineral
Mining
2211
Electric
Power
Generation
22132
Sewage
Treatment
Facilities
3241
Petroleum
and
Coal
Products
3271
Clay
Product
and
Refractory
3231
Printing
and
Related
Support
3251
Basic
Chemical
Manufacturing
3252
Resin,
Synthetic
Rubber,
Plastic
3253
Pesticide
and
Fertilizer
3255
Paint,
Coating,
Adhesive
3259
Other
Chemical
Products
3271
Cement
Block
and
Brick
3273
Cement
and
Concrete
Product
3274
Lime
and
Gypsum
Product
3279
Other
Nonmetallic
Material
3327
Machine
Shops;
Turned
Products
3328
Coating,
Engraving,
Heat
3329
Other
Fabricated
Metal
Product
3332
Industrial
Machinery
3335
Metalworking
Machinery
3339
Other
General
Purpose
Equipment
Manufacturing
3341
Computer
and
Peripheral
3342
Communications
Equipment
3343
Audio
and
Video
Equipment
3344
Semiconductor
3361
Motor
Vehicle
Manufacturing
3362
Motor
Vehicle
Body
and
Trailer
3363
Motor
Vehicle
Parts
4227
Petroleum
Wholesalers
45431
Fuel
Dealers
5622
Waste
Treatment
and
Disposal
5629
Remediation
and
Other
Waste
4(
b).
INFORMATION
REQUESTED
FACILITIES
SUBJECT
TO
THESE
REGULATIONS
5
(
i)
Data
items
All
hazardous
waste
combustors
 
hazardous
waste
burning
cement
kilns
(
CKs),
hazardous
waste
incinerators,
and
hazardous
waste
burning
lightweight
aggregate
kilns
(
LWAKs)
 
are
subject
to
this
rule
and
will
read
the
40
CFR
Part
63,
Subparts
A
and
EEE
regulations.
The
universe
of
affected
facilities
is
covered
in
detail
in
section
6(
d)
of
this
document
below.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Read
40
CFR
Part
63,
Subparts
A
and
EEE
STANDARDS
FOR
HAZARDOUS
WASTE
BURNING
INCINERATORS,
LIGHTWEIGHT
AGGREGATE
KILNS,
AND
CEMENT
KILNS
MACT
standards
for
incinerators,
lightweight
aggregate
kilns,
and
cement
kilns
are
specified
for
the
following
HAPs
in
the
Interim
Standards
Rule
(
Section
63.1203):
particulate
matter
(
PM),
CO
(
carbon
monoxide)/
HC
(
hydrocarbons),
total
chlorine
(
HCl
+
Cl
2),
semivolatile
metals
(
cadmium
and
lead),
low
volatile
metals
(
chromium,
arsenic,
and
beryllium),
PCDD/
PCDF
(
chlorinated
dioxins
and
furans),
mercury,
and
DRE
(
destruction
and
removal
efficiency).
Specific
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
related
to
the
emissions
standards
associated
with
cement
kilns,
are
discussed
in
this
section
(
these
are
not
discussed
elsewhere
in
this
document).

Cement
Kilns
with
In­
line
Raw
Mills
(
i)
Data
items
Cement
kilns
with
in­
line
raw
mills
may
comply
with
the
mercury,
semivolatile
metal,
low
volatile
metal,
and
total
chlorine
gas
emission
standards
on
a
time­
weighted
average
basis.
Kilns
must
conduct
performance
testing
when
the
raw
mill
is
on­
line
and
when
the
mill
is
off­
line
to
determine
the
time­
weighted
average
concentration
of
the
regulated
constituent.
Under
Section
63.1204(
d)(
2),
when
the
emission
averaging
provision
is
used,
kilns
must
document
in
the
operating
record
compliance
with
the
emission
standards
on
an
annual
basis.
Additionally,
the
comprehensive
performance
test
plan
and
Notification
of
Compliance
must
discuss
the
testing
and
averaging
procedures
to
be
used.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Conduct
performance
testing
when
the
raw
mill
is
on­
line
and
when
the
mill
is
offline
 
Discuss
in
the
comprehensive
performance
test
plan
the
emissions
averaging
procedure
that
will
be
used.
 
In
the
Notification
of
Compliance,
document
the
emission
averaging
procedures
that
are
used;
and
 
Document
in
the
operating
record
compliance
with
the
emission
averaging
6
requirements.

Preheater
or
Preheater/
precalciner
Cement
Kilns
with
Dual
Stacks
(
i)
Data
items
Preheater
or
preheater/
precalciner
kilns
with
dual
stacks
may
comply
with
the
mercury,
semivolatile
metal,
low
volatile
metal,
and
total
chlorine
gas
emission
standards
on
a
gas
flowrate­
weighted
average
basis.
Kilns
must
conduct
performance
testing
to
determine
the
gas
flowrate­
weighted
average
concentration
of
the
regulated
pollutant
on
each
stack.
Under
Section
63.1204(
e)(
2),
kilns
must
document
in
the
operating
record
compliance
with
the
emission
standards.
Additionally,
in
the
comprehensive
performance
test
plan
and
Notification
of
Compliance
must
discuss
the
averaging
procedures
to
be
used.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Conduct
performance
testing
on
each
stack;
 
Discuss
in
the
comprehensive
performance
test
plan
the
emissions
averaging
procedure
that
will
be
used.
 
In
the
Notification
of
Compliance,
document
the
emission
averaging
procedures
used;
and
 
Document
in
the
operating
record,
compliance
with
the
emission
averaging
requirements
for
preheater
or
preheater/
precalciner
kilns
with
dual
stack.

COMPLIANCE
WITH
THE
STANDARDS
AND
OPERATING
REQUIREMENTS
Compliance
With
Alternative
MACT
Standards
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.1206(
b)(
1)(
ii),
when
hazardous
waste
is
not
in
the
combustion
chamber
(
i.
e.,
the
hazardous
waste
feed
to
the
combusted
has
been
cutoff­
for
a
period
of
time
not
less
than
the
hazardous
waste
residence
time),
HWCs
may
elect
to
show
compliance
with
other
applicable
MACT
standards
(
such
as
non
hazardous
waste
burning
cement
kiln,
lightweight
aggregate
kiln,
or
incinerator
MACT
standards).
Specifically,
they
must
document
in
the
operating
record
compliance
with
other
applicable
MACT
requirements
in
lieu
of
the
HWC
MACT
emission
standards
and
operating
requirements
of
Subpart
EEE.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
When
hazardous
waste
is
not
in
the
combustion
chamber,
document
in
the
operating
record
compliance
with
other
applicable
MACT
requirements
in
lieu
of
the
requirements
of
HWC
MACT
Subpart
EEE.
Extension
of
Compliance
with
Emission
Standards
(
i)
Data
items
7
Under
Sections
63.1206(
b)(
4),
63.6(
i),
63.1213,
and
63.9(
c),
HWCs
may
request
EPA
for
an
extension
of
compliance
with
the
emission
standards
of
Subpart
EEE.
Section
63.6(
i)(
4)
allows
up
to
one
additional
year
to
comply
with
the
standard.
The
request
for
the
one­
year
extension
is
to
be
submitted
no
later
than
four
months
before
the
affected
source's
compliance
date.

In
addition,
under
Section
63.6(
i)(
5),
existing
sources
that
have
installed
best
available
control
technology
(
BACT)
or
technology
required
to
meet
lowest
achievable
emission
rate
(
LAER)
prior
to
the
MACT
rule
may
request
that
the
EPA
grant
an
extension
allowing
the
source
years
from
the
date
on
which
such
installation
was
achieved
to
comply
with
the
standard.
Any
request
for
the
five­
year
extension
is
to
be
submitted
no
later
than
120
days
after
the
promulgation
date
of
the
standard.

As
required
by
Section
63.6(
i)(
6),
any
request
for
an
extension
of
compliance
must
include
the
following
information:

 
A
description
of
the
controls
to
be
installed
to
comply
with
the
standard;
 
A
compliance
schedule;
 
A
description
of
emission
control
steps
that
will
be
taken
during
the
into
the
extension
period;
 
Whether
the
source
is
also
requesting
an
extension
of
other
applicable
requirements;
and
 
For
the
five­
year
extension,
all
information
needed
to
demonstrate
the
effectiveness
of
the
installation
of
BACT
or
technology
to
meet
LAER.

Under
Section
63.10(
d)(
4),
affected
sources
required
to
submit
progress
reports
as
a
condition
of
receiving
an
extension
of
compliance
must
submit
such
report
to
the
EPA
by
the
dates
specified
in
the
written
extension
of
compliance.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
request
for
an
extension
of
compliance;
and
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
progress
report,
as
applicable.

Changes
in
Design,
Operation,
or
Maintenance
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.1206(
b)(
5)(
i),
if
a
HWC
plans
to
change
the
design,
operation,
or
maintenance
practices
of
the
source
in
a
manner
that
may
adversely
affect
compliance
with
any
emission
standard
that
is
not
monitored
with
a
CEMS,
the
HWC
must
notify
EPA
at
least
60
days
prior
to
the
change,
unless
circumstances
are
documented
that
dictate
such
prior
notice
is
not
feasible.
The
notification
must
include:

 
A
description
of
the
changes
and
which
emission
standards
may
be
affected;
and
 
A
comprehensive
performance
test
schedule
and
test
plan
that
will
document
compliance
with
the
affected
emission
standards.
8
The
HWC
must
conduct
a
comprehensive
performance
test
to
document
compliance
with
the
affected
emission
standards,
establish
operating
parameter
limits,
and
submit
to
the
EPA
a
Notification
of
Compliance
under
Sections
63.1207(
j)
and
63.1210(
d).

Additionally,
if
it
is
determined
that
a
change
will
not
adversely
affect
compliance
with
the
emission
standards
or
operating
requirements,
the
HWC
must
document
the
change
in
the
operating
record
upon
making
such
change.
The
performance
test
plan,
Documentation
of
Compliance,
Notification
of
Compliance,
and
start­
up,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan
must
be
revised,
as
necessary,
to
reflect
these
changes.

Additionally,
under
Section
63.1206(
b)(
5)(
i)(
C),
a
request
may
be
made
to
burn
hazardous
waste
for
more
than
720
hours
for
purposes
other
than
testing
or
pretesting,
after
making
a
change
in
the
design
or
operation
that
could
affect
compliance
with
the
emission
standards
and
prior
to
submitting
a
revised
Notification
of
Compliance.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
notification
of
change
in
design,
operation,
or
maintenance;
 
Conduct
a
comprehensive
performance
test
to
document
compliance
with
emissions
standards
and
establish
operating
limits;
 
Document
change
in
the
operating
record
if
it
is
determined
that
the
change
will
not
adversely
affect
compliance
with
emission
standards
or
operating
requirements;
 
Revise,
as
necessary,
the
performance
test
plan,
Documentation
of
Compliance,
Notification
of
Compliance,
and
start­
up,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan
to
reflect
changes
that
will
not
adversely
affect
compliance
with
emission
standards
or
operating
requirements
and,
 
Request
approval
to
burn
hazardous
waste
for
additional
operating
time
after
change
has
been
made.

Use
of
Previous
DRE
Test
Results
to
Demonstrate
Compliance
with
the
MACT
DRE
Standard
(
i)
Data
items
Previous
collected
DRE
test
results
may
be
used
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
the
DRE
standard
(
Section
63.1206(
b)(
7)).

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
If
a
source
chooses
to
submit
previous
DRE
data
from
testing
for
a
purpose
other
than
RCRA
permit
issuance
or
re­
issuance
in
lieu
of
conducting
a
new
DRE
test,
the
source
must
document
that
the
quality
of
the
previous
data
are
suitable
for
a
compliance
demonstration.

Applicability
of
Particulate
Matter
and
Opacity
Standards
during
Particulate
Matter
CEMS
Correlation
Tests
9
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.1206(
b)(
8),
any
particulate
matter
and
opacity
standards
at
40
CFR
60,
61,
63,
264,
165,
and
266
that
are
applicable
to
a
HWC
do
not
apply
while
sources
conduct
particulate
matter
continuous
emissions
monitoring
system
(
CEMS)
correlation
tests
(
i.
e.,
correlation
with
manual
stack
methods).
Sources
must
develop
a
particulate
matter
CEMS
correlation
test
plan
that
includes
the
following
information:

 
Number
of
test
conditions
and
number
of
runs
for
each
test
condition;
 
Target
particulate
matter
emission
level
for
each
test
condition;
 
How
the
source
plans
to
modify
operation
to
attain
the
desired
particulate
matter
emission
levels;
and
 
Anticipated
normal
particulate
matter
emission
levels.

Under
Section
63.1206(
b)(
8)(
iii)(
B),
the
test
plan
must
be
submitted
to
EPA
for
approval
at
least
90
calendar
days
before
the
correlation
test
is
scheduled
to
be
conducted.

A
waiver
of
the
PM
and
opacity
standards
during
PM
CEMS
correlation
tests
may
be
requested
beyond
the
standard
allowed
time
of
96
hours..

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
particulate
matter
CEMS
correlation
test
plan.
 
If
desired,
prepare
and
submit
a
waiver
request
for
additional
hours
of
PM
CEMS
correlation
testing
beyond
the
standard
96
hours.

Alternative
Standards
for
Existing
or
New
Hazardous
Waste
Burning
Lightweight
Aggregate
Kilns
using
MACT
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.1206(
b)(
9)
hazardous
waste
burning
lightweight
aggregate
kilns
(
LWAKs)
may
petition
EPA
to
recommend
alternative
semivolatile
metal,
low
volatile
metal,
mercury,
or
total
chlorine
gas
emission
standards.
The
petition
may
be
submitted
if:

 
One
or
more
of
these
standards
cannot
be
achieved
while
using
maximum
achievable
control
technology
(
MACT)
because
of
raw
material
contributions
to
emissions
of
the
regulated
metals
or
total
chlorine
gas;
or
 
If
it
is
determined
that
Mercury
is
not
present
at
detectable
levels
in
the
raw
material.

The
alternative
standard
petition
must
include
data
and
information
documenting
that:

 
Raw
material
contributions
to
emissions
of
the
regulated
metals
or
total
chlorine
prevent
a
source
from
complying
with
the
emission
standard
even
though
the
source
is
using
MACT;
10
 
Mercury
is
not
present
at
detectable
levels
in
raw
materials;
 
Increased
chlorine
feedrates
associated
with
the
burning
of
hazardous
waste,
when
compared
to
non­
hazardous
waste
operations,
do
not
significantly
increase
metal
emissions
attributable
to
raw
materials;
and
 
Semivolatile
metals,
low
volatile
metals,
and
total
chlorine
emissions
attributable
to
the
hazardous
wastes
will
not
exceed
the
emission
standards.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
petition
for
alternative
LWAK
emission
standards,
which
must
be
included
in
the
Notification
of
Compliance.

Alternative
Standards
for
Existing
or
New
Hazardous
Waste
Burning
Cement
Kilns
using
MACT
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.1206(
b)(
10),
hazardous
waste
burning
cement
kilns
may
petition
EPA
to
recommend
alternative
semivolatile
metal,
low
volatile
metal,
mercury,
or
total
chlorine
gas
emission
standards.
The
petition
may
be
submitted
if:

 
One
or
more
of
these
standards
cannot
be
achieved
while
using
maximum
achievable
control
technology
(
MACT)
because
of
the
raw
material
contribution
to
emissions
of
the
regulated
metals
or
total
chlorine;
or
 
If
it
is
determined
that
Mercury
is
not
present
at
detectable
levels
in
the
raw
material.

The
alternative
standard
petition
must
include
data
and
information
documenting
that:

 
Raw
material
contributions
to
emissions
of
the
regulated
metals
or
total
chlorine
prevent
a
source
from
complying
with
the
emission
standard
even
though
the
source
is
using
MACT;
 
Mercury
is
not
present
at
delectable
levels
in
raw
materials;
 
Increased
chlorine
feedrate:
associated
with
the
burning
of
hazardous
waste,
when
compared
to
non­
hazardous
waste
operations,
do
not
significantly
increase
metal
emissions
attributable
to
raw
materials;
and
 
Semivolatile
metal,
low
volatile
metal,
and
total
chlorine
gas
emissions
attributable
to
the
hazardous
waste
only
will
not
exceed
the
emission
standards.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
petition
for
alternative
CK
emission
standards,
which
must
be
included
in
the
Notification
of
Compliance.

Hazardous
Waste
Residence
Time
(
i)
Data
items
11
Under
63.1206(
b)(
11),
HWCs
must
document
the
hazardous
waste
residence
time
in
the
operating
record,
and
include
it
in
the
comprehensive
performance
test
plan,
Documentation
of
Compliance,
and
Notification
of
Compliance.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Include
the
hazardous
waste
residence
time
in
the
operating
record,
test
work
plan,
and
Documentation
and
Notification
of
Compliance
documents.

Cement
Kilns
Burning
Hazardous
Waste
at
Locations
Other
than
the
Hot
End
(
i)
Data
items
An
alternative
hydrocarbon
and
carbon
monoxide
standard
may
be
requested
for
cement
kilns
that
monitor
the
bypass
duct
and
preheater
tower
location
when
waste
is
burned
at
locations
other
than
the
hot
end
of
the
kiln
(
Section
63.1206(
13)(
b)(
i)).

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Request
in
the
comprehensive
performance
test
plan
to
use
the
alternative
CK
monitoring
locations.

Alternative
Particulate
Matter
Standard
for
Incinerators
Feeding
Low
Levels
of
Metals
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.1206(
b)(
14),
incinerators
may
petition
the
EPA
for
an
alternative
particulate
matter
standard,
which
requires
compliance
with:

 
90%
SVM
system
removal
efficiency,
demonstrated
during
the
comprehensive
performance
test;
 
SVM
and
LVM
emissions
(
including
the
non­
enumerated
HAPs
of
Co,
Ni,
Mg,
and
Se)
less
than
MACT
standards,
demonstrated
during
the
comprehensive
performance
test;
 
SVM
and
LVM
feedrate
limitations
(
including
non­
enumerated
metals)
on
a
12­
hour
rolling
average.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
petition
for
an
alternative
particulate
matter
standard
for
incinerators
with
low
federates
of
metals.
 
Monitoring
of
SVM,
LVM,
and
non­
enumerated
metals
on
a
daily
average
basis.
 
Demonstration
of
SVM
SRE
in
performance
testing.
12
Alternative
to
the
Interim
Standards
for
Mercury
for
Cement
Kilns
and
LWAKs
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.1206(
b)(
15),
CK
and
LWAKs
may
comply
with
the
mercury
standard
through
analysis
of
mercury
in
hazardous
waste
feed.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Request
in
comprehensive
performance
test
plan
to
comply
with
mercury
standard
through
feedrate
monitoring.
 
Document
in
Notification
of
Compliance,
and
operating
record,
compliance
with
alternative
feedrate
based
mercury
standard.

Startup,
Shutdown,
and
Malfunction
Plan
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Sections
63.1206(
c)(
2)
and
63.6(
e)(
3),
HWCs
must
develop
and
implement
a
written
Startup,
Shutdown,
and
Malfunction
Plan
that
describes
procedures
for
operating
and
maintaining
the
source
during
periods
of
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction.
It
also
contains
a
program
of
corrective
action
for
malfunctioning
process
and
air
pollution
control
equipment
that
is
used
to
comply
with
the
relevant
standard.
The
plan
must
also
identify
all
routine
or
otherwise
predictable
CMS
malfunctions.
The
plan
shall
be
developed
by
the
source's
compliance
date.
The
SS&
M
plan
must
be
submitted
to
the
Administrator
for
review
and
approval.

When
actions
taken
during
a
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
(
including
actions
taken
to
correct
a
malfunction)
are
consistent
with
the
procedures
specified
in
the
affected
source's
SS&
M
Plan,
the
source
shall
keep
records
for
that
event
that
demonstrate
that
the
procedures
specified
in
the
plan
were
followed.
These
records
may
take
the
form
of
a
"
checklist"
or
other
effective
form
of
recordkeeping
that
confirms
compliance
with
the
SS&
M
Plan
for
that
event.

If
an
action
taken
is
not
consistent
with
the
procedures
specified
in
the
plan,
the
source
must
report
such
actions
within
2
working
days
of
commencing
actions
inconsistent
with
the
plan,
followed
by
a
letter
within
7
working
days
after
the
end
of
the
event.

Also,
sources
must
prepare,
submit
to
the
Administrator,
and
put
in
the
operating
record,
an
excess
emissions
evaluation
report
when
10
exceedences
of
operating
requirements
when
hazardous
waste
is
in
the
system
occur
over
a
60­
day
block
period
during
SS&
M
events.
The
report
must
be
submitted
within
45
days
of
the
10th
exceedance.

The
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
provisions
of
the
interim
standards
rule
exempt
sources
from
the
Subpart
EEE
emission
standards
and
operating
requirements
during
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunctions.
The
rule
continues
to
subject
sources
to
RCRA
requirements
during
malfunctions,
unless
they
comply
with
alternative
MACT
requirements
including
expanding
the
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan
to
minimize
13
the
frequency
and
severity
of
malfunctions,
and
submit
the
plan
to
the
delegated
CAA
authority
for
review
and
approval.
Source
that
burn
hazardous
waste
are
also
subject
sou
during
startup
and
shutdown
to
RCRA
requirements
for
startup
and
shutdown,
unless
they
comply
with
alternative
MACT
requirements,
and
requires
them
to
include
waste
feed
restrictions
and
operating
conditions
and
limits
in
the
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan.
Sources
are
also
required
to
include
in
the
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan
a
requirement
to
comply
with
the
automatic
hazardous
waste
feed
cutoff
system
during
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunctions.

Also,
after
ESV
openings
that
are
not
malfunctions
and
which
occur
when
waste
is
in
the
combustion
chamber,
the
source
must
document
whether
it
remains
in
compliance
with
applicable
standards,
and
submit
a
report
if
there
is
noncompliance
within
5
days
of
the
event.

The
source
must
keep
the
written
SS&
M
Plan
on
record
for
the
life
of
the
affected
source
or
until
the
affected
source
is
no
longer
subject
to
the
provisions
of
40
CFR
Part
63.
The
plan
is
to
be
made
available
for
inspection
by
the
EPA,
upon
request.
In
addition,
if
the
plan
is
revised,
the
source
must
keep
previous
versions
of
the
plan
on
record
for
a
period
of
5
years
after
each
revision
to
the
plan.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Develop,
submit,
and
implement,
a
Startup,
Shutdown,
and
Malfunction
Plan,
and
have
it
reviewed
and
approved
by
the
Administrator
(
or
alternative,
contain
procedures
in
the
RCRA
permit);
 
Make
the
plan
available
for
inspection,
if
requested
by
the
EPA;
 
Keep
the
plan
on
record
for
the
life
of
the
affected
source
or
until
the
affected
source
is
no
longer
subject
to
the
provisions
of
40
CFR
Part
63;
and
 
Keep
previous
versions
of
the
plan
on
record
for
a
period
of
5
years
after
each
revision,
if
the
plan
is
revised.
 
Prepare
and
submit
excess
emissions
evaluation
report
as
required.

Automatic
Waste
Feed
Cutoff
(
AWFCO)

(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.1206(
c)(
3)(
v),
if
there
is
an
exceedance
of
an
emission
standard
or
operating
requirement
after
any
AWFCO,
while
hazardous
waste
is
in
the
combustion
chamber,
HWCs
must:

 
Investigate
the
cause
of
the
AWFCO;
 
Take
appropriate
corrective
measures
to
minimize
future
AWFCOs;
and
 
Record
the
findings
and
corrective
measures
in
the
operating
record.

Additionally,
Section
63.1206(
c)(
3)(
vi)
requires
that,
for
each
set
of
10
exceedances
of
an
emission
standard
or
operating
requirement
while
hazardous
waste
remains
in
the
combustion
chamber
during
a
60­
day
block
period,
a
written
report
must
be
submitted
14
within
45
calendar
days
of
the
10th
exceedance
detailing
the
results
of
the
investigation
and
corrective
measures
taken.

Also,
Section
63.1206(
c)(
3)(
vii)
requires
that
the
AWFCO
system
and
associated
alarms
must
be
tested
at
least
weekly
to
verify
operability,
unless
it
is
documented
in
the
operating
record
that
weekly
inspections
will
unduly
restrict
or
upset
operations
and
that
less
frequent
inspection
will
be
adequate.
At
a
minimum,
operability
testing
must
be
conducted
at
least
monthly.
AWFCO
operability
test
procedures
and
results
must
be
documented
and
recorded
in
the
operating
record.

Section
63.1206(
c)(
3)(
viii)
allows
for
ramping
down
the
waste
feedrate
of
pumpable
hazardous
waste
over
a
period
not
to
exceed
one
minute.
Sources
electing
to
ramp
down
the
waste
feed
must
document
ramp
down
procedures
in
the
operating
and
maintenance
plan.
The
procedures
must
specify
that
the
ramp
down
begins
immediately
upon
initiation
of
automatic
waste
feed
cutoff
and
the
procedures
must
prescribe
a
bona
fide
ramping
down.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Investigate
the
cause
of
an
AWFCO,
take
appropriate
corrective
measures
to
minimize
future
AWFCOs,
and
record
the
findings
and
corrective
measures
in
the
operating
record;
 
Develop
and
submit
a
written
report
documenting
excessive
exceedances
(
i.
e.,
a
set
of
10
excellences
during
a
60­
day
block
period)
and
result
of
the
investigation
and
corrective
measures
taken;
 
Test
the
AWFCO
system
and
associated
alarms
weekly
and
document
and
record
AWFCO
operability
test
procedures
and
result
in
the
operating
record;
 
Document
in
the
operating
record
that
weekly
inspections
will
unduly
restrict
or
upset
operations;
 
Test
the
AWFCO
system
monthly
and
document
and
record
AWFCO
operability
test
procedures
and
result
in
the
operating
record;
and
 
Document
in
the
operating
and
maintenance
plan
ramp
down
procedures,
as
applicable.

ESV
Openings
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.1206(
c)(
4)(
ii),
HWCs
must
develop
an
emergency
safety
valve
(
ESV)
plan,
comply
with
the
plan,
and
keep
the
plan
in
the
operator
record.
Additionally,
Section
63.1206(
c)(
4)(
iii)
requires
that,
after
any
ESV
opening
that
is
not
a
malfunction
and
which
occurs
when
hazardous
waste
is
in
the
combustion
chamber,
the
HWC
must:

 
Investigate
the
cause
of
the
ESV
opening;
 
Take
appropriate
corrective
measures
to
minimize
such
future
ESV
openings,
and
Record
the
findings
and
corrective
measures
in
the
operating
record;
 
Document
whether
the
source
remains
in
compliance
with
applicable
standards;
15
and
 
Submit
a
written
report
to
the
Administrator
if
there
is
non­
compliance.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Develop
an
ESV
plan
and
keep
the
plan
in
the
operating
record;
 
Investigate
the
cause
of
the
ESV
openings
take
appropriate
corrective
measures
to
minimize
such
future
ESV
openings,
and
record
the
endings
and
corrective
measures
in
the
operating
record;
and
 
Document
whether
the
ESV
caused
non­
compliance
with
applicable
emissions
standards.
 
Develop
and
submit
a
written
report
documenting
the
ESV
opening
and
result
of
the
investigation
and
corrective
measures
taken
if
non­
compliance
with
applicable
emissions
standards.

Combustion
System
Leaks
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.1206(
c)(
5),
combustion
system
leaks
of
hazardous
air
pollutants
must
be
controlled
by
either:

 
Keeping
the
combustion
zone
sealed
to
prevent
combustion
system
leaks;
or
 
Maintaining
the
maximum
combustion
zone
pressure
lower
than
ambient
pressure
using
an
instantaneous
monitor
(
as
determined
on
a
site
specific
basis);
or
 
Upon
prior
written
approval
of
the
EPA,
an
alternative
means
of
control
to
provide
control
of
combustion
system
leaks
equivalent
to
maintenance
of
combustion
zone
pressure
lower
than
ambient
pressure.

The
method
used
for
control
of
combustion
system
leaks
must
be
specified
in
the
operating
record,
and
also
included
in
the
comprehensive
performance
test
plan
and
Notification
of
Compliance.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
request
to
use
an
alternative
means
of
control
to
provide
control
of
combustion
system
leaks;
and
 
Specify
in
the
operating
record
and
comprehensive
performance
test
plan
the
method
used
for
control
of
combustion
system
leaks.

Operator
Training
and
Certification
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.1206(
c)(
6),
HWCs
must
establish
a
training
and
certification
program
for
all
categories
of
personnel
whose
activities
may
reasonably
be
expected
to
directly
affect
emissions
of
hazardous
air
pollutants
from
the
source.
16
The
training
and
certification
program
may
be
developed
on
a
site
specific
basis,
and
must
follow
EPA
prescribed
training
topics
(
and
likely
will
follow
the
ASME
developed
operating
training
and
certification
program).
Each
training
program
must
be
of
a
technical
level
commensurate
with
the
person's
job
duties
specified
in
the
training
manual.
The
operator
training
and
certification
program
must
be
recorded
in
the
operating
record.

Control
room
operators
are
required
to
be
on
duty
at
source
at
all
times
the
source
is
in
operation.
Control
room
operators
must
complete
an
annual
review
or
refresher
course
as
well.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Develop
an
operator
training
and
certification
program
(
or
adopt
the
ASME
program)
and
record
the
program
in
the
operating
record.
 
Implement
the
program.
 
Keep
records
of
personnel
training
and
certification.

Operation
and
Maintenance
Plan
(
i)
Data
items
Section
63.1206(
c)(
7)(
i)
requires
a
HWC
to
prepare
and
at
all
times
operate
according
to
a
operation
and
maintenance
plan
that
describes
in
detail
procedures
for
operation,
inspection,
maintenance,
and
corrective
measures
for
all
components
of
the
combustor,
including
associated
pollution
control
equipment,
that
could
affect
emissions
of
regulated
hazardous
air
pollutants.

The
plan
must
prescribe
how
the
HWC
will
operate
and
maintain
the
combustor
in
a
manner
consistent
with
good
air
pollution
control
practices
for
minimizing
emissions
at
least
to
the
levels
achieved
during
the
comprehensive
performance
test.
The
plan
must
be
recorded
in
the
operating
record.

For
incinerators
and
LWAKs
with
fabric
filters,
bag
leak
detectors
must
be
used
to
show
compliance
as
part
of
the
operating
and
maintenance
plan.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
an
operation
and
maintenance
plan
and
record
the
plan
in
the
operating
record.
 
Use
bagleak
detectors
when
fabric
filters
are
used
on
incinerators
and
LWAKs.

PERFORMANCE
TESTING
REQUIREMENTS
Comprehensive
Performance
Test
(
i)
Data
items
17
Under
Section
63.1207(
b)(
1),
HWCs
must
conduct
a
single
comprehensive
performance
test
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
the
Interim
Standards
Rule
emission
standards
provided
by
Sections
63.1203,
63.1204,
and
63.1205,
establish
limits
for
the
operating
parameters
provided
by
Section
63.1209;
and
demonstrate
compliance
with
the
performance
specifications
for
continuous
monitoring
systems.
The
comprehensive
performance
test
must
commence
not
later
than
six
months
after
the
compliance
date.

Under
Section
63.1207(
d)(
3)
the
HWC
may
request
an
additional
60
days
to
complete
testing
if
time
is
needed
for
reasons
beyond
the
sources
control.

Additionally,
under
Section
63.1207(
h)(
2),
current
operating
parameter
limits
may
be
requested
to
be
waived
during
pretesting
for
more
than
the
standard
720
hours.

Finally,
after
a
failure
of
a
comprehensive
performance
test,
HWCs
may
request
to
burn
hazardous
waste
for
more
than
the
standard
720
hours
for
purposes
other
than
testing
or
pretesting
(
under
Section
63.1207(
l)(
3)).

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Perform
a
single
comprehensive
performance
test.
 
Request
a
60
day
time
extension
to
complete
testing.
 
Request
additional
time
to
waive
current
operating
parameter
limits
for
pretesting.

Confirmatory
Performance
Test
(
i)
Data
items
Under
the
Interim
Standards
Rule,
confirmatory
performance
testing
is
not
required.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Nothing.

Data
in
Lieu
of
the
Initial
Comprehensive
Performance
Test
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.1207(
c)(
2),
HWCs
may
request
that
previous
emissions
test
data
serve
as
documentation
of
conformance
with
the
emission
standards
of
Subpart
EEE,
provided
that
the
previous
testing:

 
Meets
sufficient
quality
assurance
requirements;
 
Is
in
conformance
with
operations
during
testing
requirements
for
comprehensive
performance
testing
(
Section
63.1207(
g)(
1));
and
 
Is
sufficient
to
establish
the
applicable
operating
parameter
limits
under
Section
63.1209.
18
(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
request
that
previous
emissions
test
data
serve
as
documentation
of
conformance
with
emission
standards.

Notification
of
Performance
Test
and
CMS
Performance
Evaluation,
and
Approval
of
Test
Plan
and
CMS
Performance
Evaluation
Plan
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.1207(
e)(
1),
HWCs
must
submit
a
notification
to
the
EPA
of
their
intention
to
conduct
a
performance
test
at
least
60
calendar
days
before
the
test
is
scheduled
to
begin.
In
the
event
the
source
is
unable
to
conduct
the
performance
test
on
the
date
specified
in
the
notification
requirement,
the
source
shall
notify
the
EPA
within
5
days
prior
to
the
scheduled
performance
date
and
specify
the
date
when
the
performance
test
is
rescheduled.

A
notification
of
intention
to
conduct
a
comprehensive
performance
test
and
CMS
performance
evaluation
and
a
site­
specific
test
plan
and
CMS
performance
evaluation
plan
must
be
submitted
at
least
one
year
before
the
performance
test
and
performance
evaluation
are
scheduled
to
begin.
The
EPA
will
notify
the
source
of
approval
or
intent
to
deny
approval
of
the
site­
specific
test
plan
and
CMS
performance
evaluation
within
9
months
after
receipt
of
the
original
plan.

As
required
by
Section
63.7(
c),
before
conducting
a
required
performance
test,
a
sitespecific
test
plan
must
be
submitted
to
the
EPA
for
approval.
The
test
plan
must
include:

 
A
test
program
summary;
 
The
test
schedule;
 
Data
quality
objectives;
and
 
Both
an
internal
and
external
quality
assurance
(
QA)
program.

Data
quality
objectives
are
the
pretest
expectations
of
precision,
accuracy,
and
completeness
of
data.

The
internal
QA
program
must
include,
at
a
minimum
the
activities
planned
to
provide
an
assessment
of
test
data
precision
(
i.
e.,
sampling
and
analysis
of
replicate
samples).
The
external
QA
program
must
include,
at
a
minimum,
application
of
plans
for
a
test
method
performance
audit
(
PA)
during
the
performance
test.
The
PAs
consist
of
blind
audit
samples
provided
by
EPA
and
analyzed
during
the
performance
test
in
order
to
provide
a
measure
of
test
data
bias.
The
external
QA
program
may
also
include
systems
audits
that
include
the
opportunity
for
on­
site
evaluation
by
EPA
of
instrument
calibration,
data
validation,
sample
logging,
and
documentation
of
quality
control
data
and
field
maintenance
activities.

The
site­
specific
test
plan
must
be
submitted
to
EPA
upon
EPA's
request
at
least
60
calendar
days
before
the
performance
test
is
scheduled
to
take
place
(
i.
e.,
simultaneously
19
with
the
notification
of
intention
to
conduct
a
performance
test),
or
on
a
mutually
agreed
upon
date.
EPA
may
request
additional
relevant
information
after
the
submittal
of
a
sitespecific
test
plan.

Under
Section
63.1207(
e),
sources
must
submit
the
site­
specific
comprehensive
performance
test
plan
and
CMS
performance
evaluation
test
plan
at
least
one
year
before
the
performance
test
is
scheduled
to
begin.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
notification
of
intention
to
conduct
a
performance
test;
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
rescheduled
notification
of
intent
to
conduct
a
performance
test,
if
the
test
is
postponed;
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
site­
specific
comprehensive
performance
test
plan;
and
 
Prepare
and
submit
additional
relevant
information
requested
by
the
EPA.

Notification
of
Compliance
(
i)
Data
items
Section
63.1207(
j)­(
l)
requires
that,
within
90
days
of
completion
of
the
comprehensive
performance
test,
HWCs
postmark
a
Notification
of
Compliance
documenting
compliance
or
noncompliance
with
the
emission
standards
and
continuous
monitoring
system
requirements,
and
identifying
operating
parameter
limits
under
Section
63.1209
for
a
comprehensive
performance
test.

Under
Section
63.9(
h),
the
Notification
of
Compliance
must
be
signed
by
the
responsible
official
who
must
certify
its
accuracy,
attesting
to
whether
the
source
has
complied
with
the
relevant
standard.
The
notification
must
list:

 
The
methods
that
were
used
to
determine
compliance;
 
The
results
of
the
performance
test,
opacity
or
visible
emission
observations,
continuous
monitoring
system
(
CMS)
performance
evaluations,
and/
or
other
monitoring
procedures
or
methods
that
were
conducted;
 
The
methods
that
will
be
used
for
determining
continuing
compliance,
including
a
description
of
monitoring
and
reporting
requirements
and
test
methods;
 
The
type
and
quantity
of
hazardous
air
pollutants
emitted
by
the
source,
reported
in
units
and
averaging
times
and
in
accordance
with
the
test
methods
specified
in
the
relevant
standard;
 
An
analysis
demonstrating
whether
the
affected
source
is
a
major
source
or
an
area
source;
 
A
description
of
air
pollution
control
equipment
(
or
method)
for
each
emission
point,
including
each
control
device
(
or
method)
for
each
hazardous
air
pollutant
and
control
efficiency
(
percent)
for
each
control
device
(
or
method);
and
 
A
statement
by
the
owner
or
operator
of
the
affected
existing,
new
or
reconstructed
source
as
to
whether
the
source
has
complied
watts
the
relevant
standard
or
other
requirements.
20
As
required
by
Sections
63.7(
g)
and
63.10(
d)(
2),
and
as
stated
above,
results
of
the
performance
tests
shall
be
submitted
as
part
of
the
notification
of
compliance
status.
Under
Section
63.1210(
d),
the
Notification
of
Compliance
status
requirements
of
Section
63.9(
h)
apply,
except
that:

 
The
notification
is
a
Notification
of
Compliance,
rather
the
compliance
status;
 
The
notification
is
required
for
the
initial
comprehensive
performance
test
and
each
subsequent
comprehensive
and
confirmatory
performance
test;
and
 
The
notification
must
be
postmarked
before
the
close
of
business
on
the
90th
day
following
completion
of
relevant
compliance
demonstration
activity
rather
than
the
60th
day
as
required
by
Section
63.9(
h)(
2)(
ii).

The
Notification
of
Compliance
requirements
of
Section
63.1207(
j)
also
apply.

Under
Section
63.1207(
j)
(
4),
a
written
request
for
a
time
extension
may
be
submitted
to
the
EPA.
The
request
must
document
that
a
source
may
not
be
able
to
meet
the
90­
day
deadline
for
reasons
beyond
its
control.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
Notification
of
Compliance.
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
written
request
for
a
time
extension,
if
necessary.

Waiver
of
Performance
Test
and
Time
Extension
for
Performance
Testing
if
Test
Plant
has
not
been
Approved
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.7(
h)
(
and
Section
63.1207(
e)(
3),
and
Section
62.1207(
i)),
performance
tests
may
be
waived
upon
written
application
to
the
EPA
if:

 
The
source
is
meeting
the
relevant
standards
on
a
continuous
basis;
 
The
source
is
being
operated
under
an
extension
of
compliance;
 
The
source
has
requested
an
extension
of
compliance
and
the
EPA
is
still
considering
that
request;
or
 
The
test
plan
has
been
submitted
to
EPA
but
has
not
yet
been
approved.

The
application
for
a
waiver
of
must
be
submitted
at
least
60
days
before
the
required
performance
test
data,
or
60
days
before
the
scheduled
date
of
the
performance
test
if
the
site­
specific
test
plan
has
been
submitted
but
not
yet
approved.

The
application
for
a
waiver
of
a
performance
test
must
include
information
justifying
the
source's
request
for
a
waiver,
such
as
the
technical
or
economic
infeasibility,
or
the
impracticality,
of
the
affected
source
performing
the
required
test.
It
must
also
include
documentation
to
enable
the
EPA
to
determine
that
the
source
is
meeting
the
relevant
standards
on
a
continuous
basis
as
required
by
Section
63.7(
h)(
2).
Extension
requests
for
21
the
initial
comprehensive
performance
test
must
include
a
Documentation
of
Compliance
to
assist
EPA
in
making
this
determination.

Also,
the
source
must
notify
the
public
of
the
petition
to
waive
the
performance
test.

Additionally,
under
Section
63.1207(
m),
HWCs
are
not
required
to
conduct
performance
tests
to
document
compliance
with
the
mercury,
semivolatile
metal,
low
volatile
metal
or
total
chlorine
gas
emission
standard
if
the
twelve­
hour
rolling
average
maximum
theoretical
emission
concentration
(
MTEC)
does
not
exceed
the
emission
standard.
To
document
compliance
with
this
provision,
HWCs
must:

 
Monitor
and
record
the
feedrate
of
mercury,
semivolatile
metals,
low
volatile
metals,
and
total
chlorine
from
all
feedstreams
according
to
Section
63.1209(
c);
 
Monitor
with
a
CMS
and
record
in
the
operating
record
the
gas
flowrate
(
either
directly
or
by
monitoring
a
surrogate
parameter
that
is
correlated
to
gas
flowrate);
 
Continuously
calculate
and
record
in
the
operating
record
the
MTEC;
 
Identify
in
the
Notification
of
Compliance
a
minimum
gas
flowrate
limit
and
a
maximum
federate
limit
of
mercury,
semivolatile
metals,
low
volatile
metals,
and/
or
total
chlorine
from
all
feedstreams
that
ensues
the
MTEC
is
below
the
applicable
emission
standard;
and
 
Interlock
the
MTEC
calculated
or
the
minimum
gas
flowrate
limit
and
maximum
federate
limit
to
the
AWFCO
system
to
stop
hazardous
waste
burning
when
the
MTEC
exceeds
the
emission
standard
or
when
the
gas
flowrate
or
mercury,
semivolatile
metals,
low
volatile
metals,
and/
or
total
chlorine
federate
exceeds
the
limit
as
identified
in
the
Notification
of
Compliance.

It
must
be
stated
in
the
site­
specific
test
plan
submitted
for
review
and
approval
the
intention
to
comply
with
the
provisions
of
63.1207(
m).

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
and
submit
an
application
for
a
waiver
of
performance
test.
 
Notify
public
of
waiver
request.
22
MONITORING
REQUIREMENTS
Continuous
Emissions
Monitoring
Systems
(
CEMS)
and
Continuous
Opacity
Monitoring
Systems
(
COMS)

(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.1209(
a),
HWCs
must
use
a
CEMS
to
demonstrate
and
monitor
compliance
with
the
carbon
monoxide
and
hydrocarbon
standards
under
Subpart
EEE.
HWCs
must
also
use
an
oxygen
CEMS
to
continuously
correct
the
carbon
monoxide
and
hydrocarbon
levels
to
7
percent
oxygen.

Additionally,
cement
kilns
must
use
a
COMS
to
demonstrate
and
monitor
compliance
with
opacity
standards
for
existing
and
new
kilns.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Install,
calibrate,
maintain,
and
continuously
operate
CEMS
for
carbon
monoxide,
hydrocarbons,
and
oxygen;
and
 
For
existing
and
new
cement
kilns,
install,
calibrate,
maintain,
and
continuously
operate
COMS
for
opacity.

Continuous
Monitoring
Systems
(
CMS)

(
i)
Data
items
Continuous
monitoring
systems
must
be
used
to
monitor
various
combustion
and
air
pollution
control
device
operating
parameters,
as
discussed
below.
Installation
and
operation
must
be
according
to
manufacturers
specifications.

CMS
evaluation
plan
and
test
plan
must
also
be
developed
as
discussed
below
in
more
detail.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Install
and
operate
all
CMS
as
required
for
compliance
with
required
operating
parameter
limits.

Feedstream
Analysis
Plan
(
i)
Data
items
Section
63.1209(
c)(
2)
requires
HWC
to
develop
and
implement
a
feedstream
analysis
plan
and
record
it
in
the
operating
record,
and
submit
to
the
EPA
for
review
and
approval,
if
requested.
The
plan
must
specify
at
a
minimum:

 
The
parameters
for
which
each
feedstream
will
be
analyzed
to
ensure
compliance
23
with
the
operating
parameter
limits
of
40
CFR
Part
63;
 
Whether
the
source
will
obtain
the
analysis
by
performing
sampling
and
analysis
or
by
other
methods,
such
as
using
analytical
information
obtained
from
others
or
using
other
published
or
documented
data
or
information;
 
How
the
analysis
will
be
used
to
document
compliance
with
all
applicable
feedrate
limits
(
e.
g.,
if
hazardous
wastes
are
blended
and
obtain
analyses
of
the
wastes
prior
to
blending
but
not
of
the
blended,
unfired,
waste,
the
plan
must
describe
how
the
pertinent
parameters
if
the
blended
waste
will
be
determined);
 
The
test
methods
which
will
be
used
to
obtain
the
analyses;
 
The
sampling
method
which
will
be
used
to
obtain
a
representative
sample
of
each
feedstream
to
be
analyzed
using
the
sampling
methods
described
in
Appendix
1,
Part
26,
of
40
CFR
261,
or
an
equivalent
method;
and
 
The
frequency
with
which
the
initial
analysis
of
the
feedstream
will
be
reviewed
or
repeated
to
ensure
that
the
analysis
is
accurate
and
up
to
date.

Additionally,
under
Section
63.1209(
c)(
4),
feedrates
must
be
monitored
and
recorded
as
follows:

 
Determine
and
record
the
value
of
the
parameter
for
each
feedstream
by
sampling
and
analysis
or
other
method;
 
Determine
and
record
the
mass
or
volume
flowrate
of
each
feedstream
by
CMS.
 
If
the
flowrate
of
a
feedstream
in
determined
by
volume,
the
density
of
the
feedstream
must
be
determined
and
recorded
by
sampling
and
analysis
(
unless
the
constituent
concentration
is
reported
in
units
of
weight
per
unit
volume
(
e.
g.,
mg/
L));
and
 
Calculate
and
record
the
mass
federate
of
the
parameter
per
unit
time.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Develop
and
implement
a
feedstream
analysis
plan
and
record
the
plan
in
the
operating
record;
 
Submit
the
plan
for
review
and
approval,
if
requested
by
the
EPA;
and
 
Monitor
and
record
feedrates.

CMS
Performance
Evaluations
CMS
Quality
Control
Program
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Sections
63.1209(
d)
and
63.8(
d),
HWCs
must
develop
and
implement
a
CMS
quality
control
program.
Each
quality
control
program
must
include,
at
a
minimum,
a
written
protocol
that
describes
procedures
for
each
pf
the
following
operations:

 
Initial
and
any
subsequent
calibration
of
the
CMS;
 
Determination
and
adjustment
of
the
calibration
drift
of
the
CMS;
 
Preventive
maintenance
of
the
CMS,
including
spare
parts
inventory;
24
 
Data
recording,
calculations,
and
reporting;
 
Accuracy
audit
procedures,
including
sampling
and
analysis
methods;
and
 
Program
of
corrective
action
for
a
malfunctioning
CMS.

Sources
must
keep
these
written
procedures
on
record
for
the
life
of
the
affected
source
or
until
the
affected
source
is
no
longer
subject
to
the
provisions
of
40
CFR
Part
63,
and
are
to
be
made
available
for
inspection
by
the
EPA,
if
requested.
Where
relevant,
these
written
procedures
may
be
incorporated
as
part
of
the
affected
source's
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan
to
avoid
duplication
of
planning
and
recordkeeping
efforts.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Develop
and
implement
a
CMS
quality
control
program;
 
Keep
the
CMS
quality
control
program
on
record
for
the
life
of
the
affected
source
or
until
the
affected
source
is
no
longer
subject
to
the
provisions
of
40
CFR
Part
63;
and
 
Submit
the
CMS
quality
control
program
for
inspection,
if
requested
by
the
EPA.

Notification
of
CMS
Performance
Evaluation
(
i)
Data
items
As
required
by
Sections
63.1209(
d),
63.8(
e)(
2)
and
63.9(
g)(
1),
HWCs
must
notify
the
EPA
in
writing
of
the
date
of
the
performance
evaluation
simultaneously
with
the
notification
of
the
performance
test
date
required
under
Section
63.7(
b)
or
at
least
60
days
prior
to
the
date
the
performance
evaluation
is
scheduled
to
begin
if
no
performance
test
is
required.
It
is
noted
that
Section
63.8(
e)(
2)
is
superseded
by
Section
63.1207(
e)
requiring
sources
to
submit
the
site­
specific
test
plan
and
the
CMS
performance
evaluation
plan
for
approval
at
least
one
year
prior
to
the
planned
test
date.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
notification
of
CMS
performance
evaluation.

Additional
Notification
Requirements
for
CMS
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.1210(
a)(
1)
and
Sections
63.9(
g)(
2)
and
(
3),
HWCs
must
furnish
the
EPA
with
the
following
written
notifications:

 
A
notification
that
COMS
data
results
will
be
used
to
determine
compliance
with
the
applicable
opacity
emission
standard
during
a
performance
test,
if
compliance
with
an
opacity
emission
standard
is
required
for
the
source
by
the
relevant
standard.
The
notification
shut
be
submitted
at
least
60
calendar
day:
before
the
performance
test
is
scheduled
to
begin;
and
25
 
A
notification
that
the
criterion
necessary
to
continue
use
of
an
alternative
to
relative
accuracy
testing
has
been
exceeded.
The
notification
shall
be
delivered
or
postmarked
not
later
the
10
days
after
the
occurrence
of
such
exceedance,
and
it
shall
include
a
description
of
the
nature
and
cause
of
the
increased
emissions.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
and
submit
additional
notification
requirements
for
sources
with
CMS.

Submission
of
Site­
Specific
CMS
Performance
Evaluation
Test
Plan
(
i)
Data
items
As
required
by
Section
63.1209(
d)
and
63.8(
e)(
3),
before
conducting
a
required
CMS
performance
evaluation,
HWCs
must
develop
and
submit
a
site­
specific
performance
evaluation
test
plan
to
the
EPA
for
approval
upon
request.
The
performance
evaluation
test
plan
shall
include:

 
The
evaluation
program
objectives;
 
An
evaluation
program
summary;
 
The
performance
evaluation
schedule;
 
Data
quality
objectives;
and
 
Both
an
internal
and
external
QA
program.

Data
quality
objectives
are
the
pre­
evaluation
expectations
of
precision,
accuracy,
and
completeness
of
day.

The
internal
QA
program
shall
include,
at
a
minimum,
the
activities
planned
by
routine
operators
and
analysts
to
provide
an
assessment
of
CMS
performance.
The
external
QA
program
shall
include,
at
a
minimal
system
audits
that
include
the
opportunity
for
on­
site
evaluation
by
the
EPA
of
instrument
calibration,
data
validation,
sample
logging,
and
documentation
of
quality
control
data
and
held
maintenance
activities.

The
source
shall
submit
the
site­
specific
performance
evaluation
test
plan
to
the
EPA
(
if
requested)
at
least
60
days
before
the
performance
test
or
performance
evaluation
is
scheduled
to
begin,
or
on
a
mutually
agreed
upon
date.
The
EPA
may
request
additional
relevant
information
after
the
submittal
of
a
site­
specific
performance
evaluation
test
plan.

It
is
noted
that
Section
63.8(
e)(
3)(
iii)
is
superseded
by
Section
63.1207(
e)
requiring
sources
to
submit
the
site­
specific
test
plan
and
the
CMS
performance
evaluation
plan
for
approval
at
least
one
year
prior
to
the
planned
test
date.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Develop
and
submit
a
CMS
site­
specific
performance
evaluation
test
plan;
and
 
Submit
additional
relevant
information,
if
requested
by
the
EPA.
26
Conduct
of
CMS
Performance
Evaluation
and
Performance
Evaluation
Dates
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.1209(
d)
and
63.8(
e))(
4),
the
HWCs
must
conduct
a
performance
evaluation
of
a
required
CMS
during
any
performance
test
required
under
Section
63.7
in
accordance
with
the
applicable
performance
specification
as
specified
in
the
relevant
standard.
Additionally,
performance
evaluations
of
components
of
the
CMS
must
be
conducted
under
the
frequency
and
procedures
(
for
example,
submittal
of
performance
evaluation
test
plan
for
review
and
approval)
applicable
to
performance
tests
as
provided
by
Section
63.1207.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Conduct
a
CMS
performance
evaluation.

Reporting
Results
of
CMS
Performance
Evaluations
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.10(
e)(
2),
the
owner
or
operator
of
an
affected
source
required
to
install
a
CMS
by
the
relevant
standard
shall
furnish
the
EPA
a
copy
of
a
written
report
of
the
results
of
the
CMS
performance
evaluation,
simultaneously
with
the
results
of
the
performance
test,
unless
otherwise
specified
in
the
relevant
standard.
Additionally,
sources
using
a
COMS
to
determine
opacity
compliance
during
any
performance
test
shall
furnish
to
EPA
two
or,
upon
request,
three
copies
of
a
written
report
of
the
results
of
the
COMS
performance
evaluation.
The
copies
shall
be
furnished
at
least
15
calendar
days
before
the
performance
test.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
written
report
of
the
results
of
the
CMS
performance
evaluation;
and
 
Prepare
and
submit
written
reports
of
the
result
of
the
COMS
performance
evaluation,
as
applicable.

Alternative
Compliance
Monitoring
Requirements
for
Standards
other
than
those
Monitored
with
a
CEMS
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.1209(
g)(
1),
HWCs
may
submit
an
application
to
the
EPA
for
approval
of
alterative
monitoring
requirements
to
document
compliance
with
the
emission
standards
of
Subpart
EEE
other
than
carbon
monoxide
or
hydrocarbon
which
are
monitored
with
a
CEMS.
An
application
to
waive
an
operating
parameter
limit
may
be
submitted
based
on
documentation
that
neither
that
operating
parameter
limit
nor
an
alternative
operating
parameter
limit
is
needed
to
ensure
compliance
with
the
emission
standards
of
Subpart
27
EEE.

The
application
must
be
submitted
to
the
EPA
not
later
than
with
the
comprehensive
test
plan.
The
application
must
include:

 
Data
or
information
justifying
the
request
for
an
alternative
monitoring
requirement
(
or
for
a
waiver
of
an
operating
parameter
limit),
such
as
the
technical
or
economic
infeasability
or
the
impracticality
of
using
the
required
approach;
 
A
description
of
the
proposed
alternative
monitoring
requirement,
including
the
operating
parameter
to
be
monitored,
the
monitoring
approach/
technique
(
e.
g.,
type
of
detector,
monitoring
location),
the
averaging
period
for
the
limit,
and
how
the
limit
is
to
be
calculated;
and
 
Data
or
information
documenting
that
the
alternative
monitoring
requirement
would
provide
equivalent
or
better
assurance
of
compliance
with
the
relevant
emission
standard,
or
that
it
is
the
monitoring
requirement
that
best
assures
compliance
with
the
standard
and
that
is
technically
and
economically
practicable.

The
EPA
will
notify
approval
or
intention
to
deny
approval
of
the
request
within
90
calendar
days
after
receipt
of
the
original
request
and
within
60
calendar
days
after
the
receipt
of
any
supplementary
information
that
is
submitted.
The
EPA
may
determine
on
a
case­
by­
case
basis
at
any
time
that
additional
or
alternative
operating
parameters
may
need
to
be
limited,
or
that
alternative
approaches
to
establish
limits
on
operating
parameters
may
be
necessary
to
document
compliance
with
the
emission
standards
of
Subpart
EEE.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
and
submit
an
application
for
use
of
an
alternative
monitoring
method;
and/
or
 
Prepare
and
submit
an
application
to
waive
all
operating
limit.

Use
of
CEMS
in
Lieu
of
Operating
Parameter
Limits
or
Alternative
Methods
in­
Lieu
of
CEMS
(
i)
Data
items
Under
63.1209(
a)(
5)
and
63.8(
f),
HWCs
may
request
the
use
of
CEMS
in
lieu
of
operating
parameter
limits,
or
alternative
methods
in
lieu
of
CEMS.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Request
the
use
of
CEMS
in
lieu
of
operating
parameter
limits,
or
alternative
methods
in
lieu
of
CEMS.

Destruction
and
Removal
Efficiency
(
i)
Data
items
28
Under
Section
63.1209(
j),
HWCs
must
remain
in
compliance
with
the
destruction
and
removal
efficiency
are)
standard
by
establishing
operating
limits
during
the
comprehensive
performance
test
(
or
during
a
previous
DRE
test)
for
the
following
parameters
and
comply
with
those
limits
at
all
times
that
hazardous
waste
remains
in
the
combustion
chamber
(
i.
e.,
the
hazardous
waste
residence
time
has
not
transpired
since
the
hazardous
waste
feed
cutoff
system
was
activated):

 
Minimum
combustion
chamber
temperature;
 
Maximum
flue
gas
flowrate
or
production
rate;
 
Maximum
hazardous
waste
federate;
and
 
Operation
of
waste
firing
system.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Comply
with
the
following
operating
limits:
minimum
combustion
chamber
temperature;
maximal
gas
flowrate
or
production
rate;
maximum
hazardous
waste
feedrate,
and
operation
of
waste
firing
system.

PCDD/
PCDF
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.1209(
k),
HWCs
must
comply
with
the
dioxin
and
furan
emission
standard
by
establishing
and
complying
with
the
following
operating
parameter
limits
based
limits
on
operations
during
the
comprehensive
performance
test:

 
Gas
temperature
at
the
inlet
to
a
dry
particulate
matter
control
device;
 
Minimum
combustion
chamber
temperature,
 
Maximum
flue
gas
flowrate
or
production
rate
 
Maximum
hazardous
waste
feedrate;
 
Particulate
matter
operating
limit;
and
 
Parameter
limits
for
the
following
air
pollution
control
devices:
­
Activated
carbon
injection
systems,
with
limits
including
carbon
federate
and
operating
temperature;
­
Carbon
bed
systems,
where
operating
parameters
to
monitor
and
control
bed
age
must
be
specified
on
a
site
specific
basis
in
the
comprehensive
performance
test
plan;
­
Catalytic
oxidizers,
with
limits
on
operating
temperature;
and
­
Inhibitor
federates.

As
stated
in
Section
63.1209(
k)(
6)(
iii)(
B),
HWCs
equipped
with
activated
carbon
injection
systems
may
substitute
at
any
time
a
different
brand
or
type
of
carbon
provided
that
the
replacement
has
equivalent
or
improved
properties
compared
to
the
carbon
used
in
the
performance
test
and
conforms
to
the
key
solvent
parameters.
Documentation
that
the
substitute
carbon
will
provide
the
same
level
of
control
as
the
original
carbon
must
be
included
in
the
operating
record.
29
Under
Section
63.1209(
k)(
7)(
ii)(
B),
HWCs
equipped
with
carbon
bed
systems
day
substitute
at
any
time
a
different
bind
or
type
of
carbon
provided
that
the
replacement
his
equivalent
or
improved
properties
compared
to
the
carbon
used
in
the
performance
test.
Documentation
that
the
substitute
carbon
will
provide
the
same
level
of
control
as
the
original
carbon
must
be
included
in
the
operating
record.

For
HWCs
feeding
dioxin/
furans
inhibitors
into
the
combustion
system,
under
Section
63.1209(
k)(
9)(
ii)(
B),
a
different
brand
or
type
of
inhibitor
may
be
substituted
at
any
time
provided
that
the
replacement
has
equivalent
or
improved
properties
compared
to
the
inhibitor
used
in
the
performance
test
and
conforms
to
the
key
parameter
that
affect
the
effectiveness
of
the
inhibitor.
Documentation
that
the
substitute
inhibitor
will
provide
the
some
level
of
control
as
the
original
inhibitor
must
be
included
in
the
operating
record.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
Comply
with
the
following
operating
parameter
limits:

 
Gas
temperature
at
the
inlet
to
a
dry
particulate
matter
control
device;
 
Minimum
combustion
chamber
temperature;
 
Maximum
flue
gas
flowrate
or
production
rate;
 
Maximum
hazardous
waste
federate;
particulate
matter
operating
limit;
 
Operating
parameter
limits
for
activated
carbon
injection
or
carbon
bed
systems,
catalytic
oxidizers,
and
inhibitors;
and
 
If
carbon
is
used,
document
in
the
operating
record
that
replacement
carbon
will
provide
the
same
level
of
control
as
the
original
carbon
used
during
the
performance
test.
 
If
inhibitors
are
used,
document
in
the
operating
record
that
replacement
inhibitor
will
provide
the
some
level
of
control
as
the
original
inhibitor
used
during
the
performance
test.

Mercury
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.1209(
l)
HWCs
must
comply
with
the
mercury
emission
standard
by
establishing
and
complying
with
the
following
operating
parameter
limits.
These
limits
must
be
based
on
operations
during
the
comprehensive
performance
test
(
or
manufacturer
specifications):

 
Feedrate
of
total
mercury;
and
 
Parameter
limits
for
the
following
air
pollution
control
devices:
­
Wet
scrubbers;
­
Activated
carbon
injection
systems;
and
­
Activated
carbon
bed
systems.

A
12
hour
rolling
average
limit
for
the
total
feedrate
of
mercury
in
all
feedstreams
must
be
established
as
the
average
of
the
hourly
rolling
averages
for
each
run.
30
Under
Section
63.1209(
a)(
5),
HWCs
may
petition
the
EPA
to
use
CEMS
for
compliance
monitoring
for
mercury
in
lieu
of
compliance
with
the
corresponding
operating
parameter
limits
under
Section
63.1209.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Comply
with
the
following
operating
parameter
limits:
feedrate
of
total
mercury;
and
parameter
limits
for
wet
scrubbers,
and
activated
carbon
injection
or
carbon
bed
systems;
or
 
Install,
calibrate,
maintain
and
continuously
operate
CEMS
for
compliance
monitoring
for
mercury.

Particulate
Matter
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.1209(
m),
HWCs
must
comply
with
the
particulate
matter
emission
standard
by
establishing
and
complying
with
the
following
operating
parameter
limits
based
on
operations
during
the
comprehensive
performance
test:

 
APCD
operating
limits
for:
­
High
energy
or
ionizing
wet
scrubbers,
including
pressure
drop,
scrubber
liquid/
gas
ratio,
scrubber
liquor
solid
content.
­
Baghouses,
including
pressure
drop
and
gas
flowrate.
­
Electrostatic
precipitators,
including
power
input
and
gas
flowrate.
­
Other
particulate
matter
control
devices.
 
Maximal
flue
gas
flowrate
or
production
rate,
and
 
Maximum
ash
feedrate.

Alternately,
install,
calibrate,
maintain
and
continuously
operate
CEMS
for
compliance
monitoring
for
PM.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
Comply
with
the
following
operating
parameter
limits:

 
APCD
operating
limits
for
wet
scrubbers,
fabric
filters,
and
electrostatic
precipitators
 
Maximum
flue
gas
flowrate
or
production
rate;
and
 
Maximum
ash
feedrate.;
or
 
Install,
calibrate,
maintain
and
continuously
operate
CEMS
for
compliance
monitoring
for
PM.

Semivolatile
Metals
and
Low
Volatile
Metals
(
i)
Data
items
31
Under
Section
63.1209(
n),
HWCs
must
comply
with
the
semivolatile
metal
(
cadmium
and
lead)
and
low
volatile
metal
(
arsenic,
beryllium,
and
chromium)
emission
standards
by
establishing
and
complying
with
the
following
operating
parameter
limits
base
on
operations
during
the
comprehensive
performance
test:

 
Maximize
inlet
temperature
to
dry
particulate
matter
air
pollution
control
device;
 
Maximum
federate
of
semivolatile
and
low
volatile
metals;
APCD
operating
parameter
limits
specified
for
particulate
matter;
 
Maximum
total
chlorine
and
chloride
federate;
and
 
Maximum
flue
gas
flowrate
or
production
rate.

A
l2­
hour
rolling
average
limit
for
the
federates
of
combined
semivolatile
metals
and
combined
low
volatile
metals
must
be
established,
in
all
feedstreams
as
the
average
of
the
average
hourly
rolling
averages
for
each
run,
as
well
as
a
l2­
hour
rolling
average
limit
for
combined
semivolatile
metals
in
all
pumpable
feedstream
as
the
average
of
the
average
holly
rolling
averages
for
each
run.
Dual
feedrate
limits
for
both
pumpable
and
total
feedstreams
are
not
used
if
the
total
feedrate
limit
is
based
solely
on
the
feederate
of
pumpable
feedstreams.

Section
63.1209(
n)(
2)(
ii)
states
that
the
use
semivolatile
metal
and
low
volatile
metal
federates
and
associated
emission
rates
during
the
comprehensive
performance
test
to
extrapolate
to
higher
allowable
federate
limits
and
emission
rates
may
be
requested
as
part
of
the
performance
test
plan.

Under
Section
63.1209(
a)(
5),
HWCs
may
petition
to:
EPA
to
use
CEMS
for
compliance
monitoring
for
semivolatile
and
low
volatile
metals
in
lieu
of
compliance
with
the
corresponding
operating
parameter
limits
under
Section
63.1209.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
Comply
with
the
following
operating
parameter
limits:

 
Maximum
inlet
temperature
to
dry
particulate
matter
air
pollution
control
device;
 
Maximum
feedrate
of
semivolatile
and
low
volatile
metals;
 
APCD
operating
parameter
limits
specified
for
particulate
matter;
 
Maximum
total
chlorine
and
chloride
feedrate
 
Maximum
flue
gas
flowrate
or
production
rate;
and
 
Prepare
and
submit
request
to
extrapolate
semivolatile
metal
and
low
volatile
metal
feedrate
limits;
or
 
Install,
calibrate,
maintain,
and
continuously
operate
CEMS
for
compliance
monitoring
for
semivolatile
metals
and
low
volatile
metals.

Total
Chlorine
(
Hydrogen
Chloride
and
Chlorine
Gas)

(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.1209(
o),
HWCs
must
comply
with
the
total
chlorine
emission
standard
32
by
establishing
and
complying
with
the
following
operating
parameter
limits
based
on
operations
during
the
comprehensive
performance
test:

 
Feedrate
of
total
chlorine
and
chloride;
 
Maximum
flue
gas
flowrate
or
production
rate;
 
Parameter
limits
for
the
following
air
pollution
control
devices:
wet
scrubbers
and
dry
scrubbers.

Under
Section
63.1209(
a)(
5),
HWCs
may
petition
the
EPA
to
use
CEMS
for
compliance
monitoring
for
total
chlorine
in
lieu
of
compliance
with
the
corresponding
operating
parameter
limits
under
Section
63.1209.

For
HWCs
equipped
with
dry
scrubbers,
Section
63.1209(
o)(
4)(
iii)(
B)
states
that
a
different
brand
or
type
of
sorbent
may
be
substituted
at
any
time
provided
that
the
replacement
has
equivalent
or
improved
properties
compared
to
the
serpent
used
in
the
performance
test
and
conforms
to
the
key
parameters.
Documentation
that
the
substitute
sorbent
will
provide
the
some
level
of
control
as
the
original
sorbent
must
be
included
in
the
operating
record.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
Comply
with
the
following
operating
parameter
limits:

 
Comply
with
the
following
operating
parameter
limits
feedrate
of
total
chlorine
and
chloride;
maximum
flue
gas
flowrate
or
production
rate;
and
operating
parameter
limits
for
wet
and
dry
scrubbers;
and
 
Document
in
the
operating
record
that
replacement
sorbent
will
provide
the
same
level
of
control
as
the
original
sorbent
used
during
the
performance
test;
or
 
Install,
calibrate,
maintain,
and
continuously
operate
CEMS
for
compliance
storing
for
total
chlorine.

Operating
under
Different
Modes
of
Operation
(
i)
Data
items
Given
that
HWCs
must
establish
limits
for
applicable
operating
parameters
based
on
operations
during
the
comprehensive
performance
test,
Section
63.1207(
g)(
1)(
i)
states
that
a
HWC
may
conduct
testing
under
two
or
more
operating
modes
to
provide
operating
flexibility.

Under
Section
63.1209(
q),
when
the
HWC
changes
a
mode
of
operation
and
begins
complying
with
the
operating
parameter
limits
for
an
alternative
mode
of
operation,
it
must
be
recorded
in
the
operating
record.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Document
the
mode
of
operation
in
the
operating
record,
if
a
source
has
tested
33
under
two
or
more
operating
modes.

NOTIFICATION
REQUIREMENTS
HWCs
must
submit
various
notifications
listed
under
Section
63.1210(
a)(
1).
HWCs
must
also
submit
a
number
of
notifications
listed
under
Section
63.1210(
a)(
2)
for
requests,
petitions,
or
applications
in
order
to
comply
with
reduced
or
alternative
requirements.
The
following
section
provides
descriptions
of
notification
requirements
not
discussed
in
preceding
or
following
sections
of
this
document.

Initial
Notifications
(
i)
Data
items
The
initial
notification
requirements
of
Section
63.9(
b)
apply
to
the
owner
or
operator
of
an
affected
source
when
such
source
becomes
subject
to
the
relevant
standard.
An
affected
source
with
an
initial
startup
date
before
the
effective
date
of
the
relevant
standard
shall
notify
the
EPA
in
writing
that
the
source
is
subject
to
the
relevant
standard.
The
notification
shall
be
submitted
not
later
than
120
calendar
days
after
the
effective
date
of
the
relevant
standard
(
or
within
120
calendar
days
our
the
source
becomes
subject
to
the
relevant
standard),
and
shall
provide
the
following
information:

 
The
name
and
address
of
the
owner
or
operator;
 
The
address
of
the
affected
source;
 
An
identification
of
the
relevant
standard,
or
other
requirement,
that
is
the
basis
of
the
notification
and
the
source's
compliance
date;
 
A
brief
description
of
the
nature,
size,
design,
and
method
of
operation
of
the
source,
including
its
operating
design
capacity
and
an
identification
of
each
point
of
emission
for
each
hazardous
air
pollutant,
or
if
a
definitive
identification
is
not
yet
possible,
a
preliminary
identification
of
each
point
of
emission
for
each
hazardous
air
pollutant;
and
 
A
statement
of
whether
the
affected
source
is
a
major
source
or
an
area
source.

The
owner
or
operator
of
a
new
or
reconstructed
affected
source,
or
a
source
that
has
been
reconstructed
such
that
it
is
an
affected
source,
with
an
initial
startup
after
the
effective
date
of
the
relevant
standard
and
for
which
reapplication
for
approval
of
construction
or
reconstruction
is
not
required,
shall
notify
the
EPA
in
writing
that
the
source
is
subject
to
the
relevant
standard
no
later
the
120
days
after
initial
startup.
The
notification
shall
provide
all
the
information
listed
above.

After
the
effective
date
of
the
relevant
standard,
an
owner
or
operator
who
intends
to
construct
a
new
affected
source,
or
reconstruct
a
source
such
that
it
becomes
an
affected
source,
shall
notify
the
EPA
in
writing
of
the
intended
construction
or
reconstruction.
The
notification
shall
be
submitted
as
soon
as
practicable
before
the
construction
or
reconstruction
commences
after
the
effective
date
of
the
relevant
standard
or
as
soon
as
practicable
before
startup
but
no
later
than
60
days
of
the
relevant
standard
if
the
construction
or
reconstruction
had
commenced
and
initial
startup
has
not
occurred
before
34
the
standard's
effective
date.
The
notification
shall
include
all
the
information
required
for
an
application
for
approval
of
construction
or
reconstruction,
as
described
below.

Application
for
Approval
of
Construction
or
Reconstruction
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.5(
d),
a
separate
application
shall
be
submitted
for
each
construction
or
reconstruction.
Each
application
for
approval
of
construction
or
reconstruction
shall
include
at
a
minimum:

 
The
applicant's
name
and
address;
 
A
notification
of
intention
to
construct
a
new
major
affected
source
of
make
any
physical
or
operational
change
to
a
major
affected
source
that
may
meet
or
has
been
determined
to
meet
the
criteria
for
a
reconstruction;
 
The
address
or
proposed
address
of
the
source;
 
An
identification
of
the
relevant
standard
that
is
the
basis
of
the
application;
 
The
expected
commencement
date
of
the
construction
or
reconstruction;
 
The
expected
completion
date
of
the
construction
or
reconstruction;
 
The
anticipated
date
of
(
initial)
startup
of
the
source;
and
 
The
type
and
quantity
of
hazardous
air
pollutants
emitted
by
the
source,
or
if
actual
emissions
data
are
not
yet
available,
an
estimate
of
the
type
and
quantity
of
hazardous
air
pollutants
expected
to
be
emitted
by
the
source.

An
owner
or
operator
who
submits
estimates
or
preliminary
information
in
place
of
the
actual
emissions
data
and
analysis
shall
submit
the
actual
measured
emissions
data
and
other
correct
information
as
soon
as
available
but
no
later
than
with
the
Notification
of
Compliance
status.

Additionally,
each
application
for
approval
of
construction
shall
include
technical
information
describing
the
proposed
nature,
size,
design,
operating
design
capacity,
arid
method
of
operation
of
the
source,
including
an
identification
of
each
point
of
emission
for
each
hazardous
air
pollutant
that
is
emitted
(
or
could
be
emitted)
and
a
description
of
the
planned
air
pollution
control
system
(
equipment
or
method)
for
each
emission
point.

Each
application
for
approval
of
reconstruction
shall
also
include:

 
A
brief
description
of
the
affected
source
and
the
components
that
are
to
be
replaced;
 
A
description
of
present
and
proposed
emission
control
systems
(
i.
e.,
equipment
or
methods);
 
An
estimate
of
the
fixed
capital
cost
of
the
replacements
and
of
constructing
a
comparable
entirely
new
source;
 
The
estimated
life
of
the
affected
source
our
the
replacements;
 
A
discussion
of
any
economic
or
technical
limitations
the
source
may
have
in
complying
with
relevant
standards
or
other
requirements
after
the
proposed
replacements;
and
35
 
If
in
the
application
for
approval
of
reconstruction
the
owner
or
operator
designates
the
affected
source
as
a
reconstructed
source
and
declares
that
there
are
no
economic
or
technical
limitations
to
prevent
the
source
from
complying
with
all
relevant
standards
or
other
requirements,
the
owner
or
operator
need
not
submit
the
information
required
in
the
last
three
bullets
listed
above.

The
EPA
may
request
additional
relevant
information
after
the
submittal
of
an
Application
for
approval
of
construction
or
reconstruction.
It
is
noted
that
Section
63.9(
b)(
1)(
i)
pertains
to
notification
requirements
for
area
sources
that
become
a
major
source,
and
Section
63.9(
b)(
2)(
v)
requires
a
major
source
determination.
Although
area
sources
are
subject
to
all
provisions
of
Subpart
EEE,
these
sections
nonetheless
apply
because
the
major
source
determination
may
affect
the
applicability
of
Part
63
standards
or
of
Title
V
permit
requirements
to
other
sources
(
i.
e.,
other
than
the
hazardous
waste
combustor)
of
hazardous
air
pollutants
at
the
facility.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
and
submit
an
initial
notification;
 
Prepare
and
submit
an
application
of
approval
of
construction,
as
applicable;
 
Prepare
and
submit
an
application
of
approval
of
reconstruction,
as
applicable;
and
 
Submit
additional
relevant
information
as
requested
by
the
EPA.

Adjustment
to
Time
Periods
or
Postmark
Deadlines
for
Submittal
and
Review
of
Required
Communications
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.9(
i),
the
owner
or
operator
of
an
effected
source
shall
request
an
adjustment
for
submittal
and
review
of
required
time
period
or
postmark
deadline
each
time
they
wish
to
change
an
applicable
time
period
or
postmark
deadline
specified
in
40
CFR
Part
63.
The
request
shall
be
made
in
writing
as
soon
as
practicable
before
the
subject
activity
is
required
to
take
place.
The
owner
or
operator
shall
include
in
the
request
whatever
information
he
or
she
considers
useful
to
convince
the
EPA
that
an
adjustment
is
warranted.
The
EPA
will
notify
the
source
in
writing
of
approval
or
disapproval
of
the
request
for
an
adjustment
within
15
calendar
days
of
receiving
sufficient
information
to
evaluate
the
request.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
request
for
an
adjustment
to
a
time
period
or
postmark
deadline.

Change
in
Information
Already
Provided
(
i)
Data
items
As
required
by
Section
63.9(
j),
any
change
is
the
information
already
provided
under
36
Section
63.9
shall
be
provided
to
the
EPA
in
writing
within
15
calendar
days
after
the
change.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Submit
change(
s)
in
the
information
already
provided,
as
decease.

Request
to
Reduce
Frequency
of
Excess
Emissions
and
Continuous
Monitoring
System
Performance
Reports
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.10(
e)(
3)(
ii),
an
owner
or
operator
of
an
affected
source
required
by
a
relevant
standard
to
submit
excess
emission:
and
continuous
monitoring
system
performance
(
and
summary)
reports
on
a
quarterly
(
or
more
frequent)
basis
may
reduce
the
frequency
of
reporting
for
that
standard
to
semiannual
if
the
following
conditions
are
met:

 
For
1
full
year
(
e.
g.,
4
quarterly
or
12
monthly
reporting
periods)
the
affected
source's
excess
emissions
and
continuous
monitoring
system
performance
reports
continually
demonstrate
that
the
source
is
in
compliance
with:
the
relevant
standard;
 
The
source
continues
to
comply
with
all
recordkeeping
and
monitoring
requirements;
and
 
The
EPA
does
not
object
to
a
reduced
sequence
of
reporting
for
the
affected
source.

The
frequency
of
reporting
of
excess
emissions
and
continuous
monitoring
system
performance
(
and
summary)
reports
may
be
reduced
only
alter
the
source
notifies
the
EPA
in
writing
of
its
intention
to
make
such
a
change
and
the
EPA
does
not
object
to
the
intended
change.

(
i)
Respondent
actions
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
request
to
reduce
frequency
of
excess
emissions
and
CMS
performance
reports.

Waiver
of
Recordkeeping
or
Reporting
Requirements
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.10(
f),
recordkeeping
or
reporting
requirements
may
be
waived
upon
written
application
to
the
EPA
if,
in
the
EPA's
judgement,
an
affected
source
is
achieving
the
relevant
standards,
or
the
source
is
operating
under
an
extension
of
compliance,
or
the
source
has
requested
an
extension
of
compliance
and
the
EPA
is
still
considering
that
request.
If
an
application
for
a
waiver
of
recordkeeping
or
reporting
is
made,
the
application
shall
accompany
the
request
for
an
extension
of
compliance,
any
required
37
compliance
progress
report
or
compliance
stabs
report
required
or
in
the
source''
s
title
V
permit,
or
an
excess
emissions
and
continuous
monitoring
system
performance
report,
whichever
is
applicable.
The
application
shall
include
whatever
information
the
source
considers
useful
to
convince
the
EPA
that
a
waiver
of
recordkeeping
or
reporting
is
warranted.

(
i)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
waiver
of
recordkeeping
or
reporting.

Data
Compression
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.1211(
d),
a
writhed
request
may
be
submitted
to
the
EPA
for
approval
to
use
data
compression
techniques
to
record
data
from
CMS,
including
CEMS,
on
a
frequency
less
than
required
by
Section
63.1209.
The
request
must
be
submitted
for
review
and
approval
as
part
of
the
comprehensive
performance
test
plan.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
and
submit
request
for
approval
to
use
data
compression
techniques
to
record
data
on
a
less
frequent
basis
than
required
by
Section
63.1209.

RECORDKEEPING
AND
REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS
Section
63.1211(
a)
provides
a
summary
of
the
various
reporting
requirements
that
must
be
submitted
by
HWCs.
Documents,
data,
or
information
that
must
be
retained
in
the
operating
record
are
summarized
in
Section
63.1211(
c).
The
following
section
provides
descriptions
of
reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements
not
discussed
in
preceding
or
following
sections
of
this
document.

Startup,
Shutdown,
and
Malfunction
Reports
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.10(
d)(
5)(
i),
if
actions
taken
during
a
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
are
consistent
with
the
procedures
specified
in
the
source's
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan,
such
information
shall
be
stated
in
a
setup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
report.
Reports
shall
only
be
required
if
a
stamp,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
occurred
during
the
reporting
period.
the
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
report
shall
consist
of
a
letter,
containing
the
name,
title,
and
signature
of
the
owner
or
operator
or
other
responsible
official
who
is
certifying
its
accuracy,
that
shall
be
submitted
to
the
EPA
semiannually.
The
report
shall
be
delivered
or
postmarked
by
the
30th
day
following
the
end
of
each
calendar
half
(
or
other
calendar
reporting
period,
as
appropriate).

Under
Section
63.10(
d)(
5)(
ii),
any
time
an
action
taken
during
a
startup,
shutdown,
and
38
malfunction
is
not
consistent
with
the
procedures
specified
in
the
affected
source's
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan,
the
actions
take:
for
that
event
shall
be
reported
within
2
working
days
after
commencing
actions
inconsistent
with
the
plan
followed
by
a
letter
within
7
working
after
the
end
of
the
event.
The
immediate
report
required
shall
consist
of
a
telephone
call
(
or
facsimile
(
FAX)
transmission)
to
the
EPA
within
2
working
days
after
commencing
actions
inconsistent
with
the
plan,
and
it
shall
be
followed
by
a
letter,
delivered
or
postmarked
within
7
working
days
our
the
end
of
the
event,
that
contains
the
name,
title,
and
signature
of
the
responsible
official
who
is
certifying
its
accuracy,
explaining
the
circumstance
of
the
event,
the
reasons
for
not
following
the
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan,
and
whether
any
excess
emissions
and/
or
parameter
monitoring
excellences
are
believed
to
have
occurred.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
periodic
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
report,
as
applicable;
and
 
Prepare
and
submit
an
immediate
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan,
as
applicable.

Excess
Emissions
and
Continuous
Monitoring
System
Performance
Report
and
Summary
Report
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.10(
e)(
3),
the
owner
or
operator
of
an
affected
source
required
to
install
a
CMS
by
a
relevant
standard
shall
submit
an
excess
emissions
ad
continuous
monitoring
system
performance
report
and/
or
summary
report
to
the
EPA
semiannually.
The
summary
report
shall
be
entitled
summary
Report
­
Gaseous
and
Opacity
Excess
Emission
and
Continuous
Monitoring
System
Performance,
and
shall
contain
the
following
information:

 
The
company
name
and
address
of
the
affected
source;
 
An
identification
of
each
hazardous
air
pollutant
monitored
at
the
affected
source;
 
The
beginning
and
ending
dates
of
the
reporting
period;
 
A
brief
description
of
the
process
units;
 
The
emission
and
operating
parameter
limitations
specified
in
the
relevant
standard(
s);
 
The
monitoring
equipment
manufacturer(
s)
and
model
number(
s);
 
The
date
of
the
latest
CMS
certification
or
audit;
 
The
total
operating
time
of
the
affected
source
during
the
reporting
period;
An
emissions
data
summary
(
or
similar
summary
if
the
owner
or
operator
monitors
'
control
system
parameterize
including:
­
The
total
duration
of
excess
emissions
during
the
reporting
period
(
recorded
in
minutes
for
opacity
and
hours
for
goes);
­
The
total
duration
of
excess
emissions
expressed
as
a
percent
of
the
total
source
operating
time
during
that
reporting
period;
and
­
A
breakdown
of
the
total
duration
of
excess
emissions
during
the
reporting
period
into
those
that
are
due
to
startup/
shutdown,
control
equipment
39
problems,
process
problems,
other
known
causes,
and
other
unknown
causes;
­
A
CMS
performance
summary
(
or
similar
summary
if
the
owner
or
operator
monitors
control
system
parameters),
including:
­
The
total
CMS
downtime
during
the
reporting
period
(
recorded
in
minutes
for
opacity
and
hours
for
gases);
­
The
total
duration
of
CMS
downhill:
expressed
as
a
percent
of
the
total
source
operating
time
during
that
reporting
period;
and
­
A
breakdown
of
the
total
CMS
downtime
during
the
reporting
period
into
periods
that
are
due
to
monitoring
equipment
malfunctions,
nonmonitoring
equipment
malfunctions,
quality
assurance/
quality
control
calibrations,
other
known
causes,
and
other
unknown
causes;
­
A
description
of
any
changes
in
CMS,
processes,
or
controls
since
the
last
reporting
period;
 
The
name,
title,
and
signature
of
the
responsible
official
who
is
certifying
the
accuracy
of
the
report;
and
 
The
date
of
the
report.

All
excess
emissions
and
monitoring
system
performance
reports
and
all
summary
reports,
if
required,
shall
be
delivered
or
postmarked
by
the
30th
day
following
the
end
of
each
calendar
year,
as
appropriate.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
and
submit
an
excess
emissions
and
monitoring
system
performance
report
and
summary
report.

General
Recordkeeping
Requirements
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.10(
b),
the
owner
or
operator
of
an
affected
source
shall
maintain
files
of
all
information
(
including
21
reports
and
notifications)
in
a
form
suitable
and
readily
available
for
expeditious
inspection
and
review.
The
files
shall
be
retained
for
a
least
5
years
following
the
date
of
each
occurrence,
measurement,
maintenance,
corrective
action,
report,
or
record.
At
a
minimal,
the
most
recent
2
years
of
data
shall
be
retained
on
site.
The
remaining
3
years
of
data
may
be
retained
off­
site.
Such
files
may
be
maintained
in
microfilm,
on
a
computer,
on
computer
floppy
disks,
on
magnetic
tape
disks,
or
on
microfiche.

Sources
shall
maintain
relevant
records
for
such
source
of:

 
The
occurrence
and
duration
of
each
startup,
shutdowns
or
malfunction
of
operation;
 
The
occurrence
and
duration
of
each
malfunction
of
the
air
pollution
control
equipment;
 
All
maintenance
performed
on
the
air
pollution
control
equipment;
 
Actions
taken
during
periods
of
startup,
shutdown,
aid
malfunction
when
such
40
actions
are
different
from
the
procedures
specified
in
the
affected
source's
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan;
 
All
information
necessary
to
demonstrate
conformance
with
the
affected
source's
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan
are
consistent
with
the
procedures
specified
in
such
plan;
 
Each
period
during
which
a
CMS
is
malfunctioning
or
inoperative;
All
required
measurements
needed
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
a
relevant
standard;
 
All
required
measurements
needed
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
a
relevant
standard;
 
All
results
of
performance
tests,
CMS
performance
evocations,
and
opacity
ad
visible
emissions
observations;
 
All
measurements
as
may
be
necessary
to
determine
the
conditions
of
performance
tests
and
performance
evaluations;
All
CMS
calibration
checks;
 
All
adjustments
and
maintenance
performed
on
CMS;
 
Any
information
demonstrating
whether
a
source
is
meeting
the
requirements
for
a
waiver
of
recordkeeping
or
reporting
requirements,
if
the
source
has
been
granted
a
waiver;
 
Al1
emission
levels
relative
to
the
criterion
for
obtaining
permission
to
use
an
alternative
to
the
relative
accuracy
test,
if
the
source
has
been
granted
such
emission;
and
 
All
documentation
supporting
initial
notifications
and
notifications
of
compliance.

(
i)
Respondent
activities
 
Retain
files
of
all
information
(
including
all
reports
and
notification)
for
at
least
5
years
Additional
Recordkeeping
Requirements
for
Continuous
Monitoring
Systems
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.10(
c),
the
owner
or
operator
of
an
affected
source
required
to
install
a
CMS
by
a
relevant
standard
shall
maintain
records
for
such
source
of:

 
All
required
CMS
measurements
 
The
date
and
time
identifying
each
period
during
which
the
CMS
was
out
of
control;
 
The
specific
information
of
each
period
of
excess
emissions
and
parameter
monitoring
exceedingly,
as
defined
in
the
relevant
standard(
s),
(
has
occurs
during
startups,
shutdowns,
and
malfunctions
of
the
affected
source;
 
The
specific
information
of
each
time
period
of
excess
emissions
and
parameter
monitoring
exceedances,
as
defined
in
the
relevant
standard(
s),
that
occurs
during
periods
other
than
startups,
shutdowns,
and
malfunctions
of
the
affected
source;
 
The
nature
and
cause
of
any
malfunction;
 
The
corrective
action
taken
or
preventive
measures
adopted;
 
The
nature
of
the
repairs
or
adjustments
to
the
CMS
that
was
inoperative
or
out
of
control;
41
 
The
total
process
operating
time
during
the
reporting
period;
and
 
All
procedures
that
are
part
of
a
quality
control
program
developed
and
implemented
for
CMS.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Maintain
additional
records
for
continuous
monitoring
systems.

Documentation
of
Compliance
(
i)
Data
items
As
required
by
Section
63.1211(
c),
by
the
compliance
date,
a
Documentation
of
Compliance
must
be
developed
and
included
in
the
operating
record.
The
Documentation
of
Compliance
mist
identify
the
applicable
emission
standards
under
Subpart
EEE
and
the
limits
on
the
operating
parameters
under
Section
63.1209
that
will
ensure
compliance
with
those
emission
standards.
A
signed
and
dated
certification
must
be
included
in
the
Documentation
of
Compliance
that:

 
Required
CEMS
and
CMS
are
installed,
calibrated,
aid
continuously
operating
in
compliance
with
the
requirements
of
Subpart
EEE;
and
 
Based
on
an
engineering
evaluation
prepared
under
an
owner
or
operator's
direction
or
supervision
in
accordance
with
a
system
designed
to
ensure
that
qualified
personnel
properly
gathered
and
evaluated
the
information
and
supporting
documentation,
and
considering
at
a
minimum
the
design,
operation,
and
maintenance
characteristics
of
the
combusted
and
emissions
control
equipment,
the
types,
quantities,
and
characteristics
of
feedstreams,
and
available
emission
data:
­
A
source
is
in
compliance
with
the
emission
standards
of
Subpart
EEE;
and
­
The
limits
on
the
operating
parameters
under
Section
63.1209
ensure
compliance
with
the
emissions
standards
of
Subpart
EEE.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Develop
a
Documentation
of
Compliance
and
include
it
in
the
operating
record.

COMPLIANCE
DATE
BE
EXTENDED
TO
INSTALL
POLLUTION
PREVENTION
OR
WASTE
MINIMIZATION
CONTROLS
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Section
63.1213,
HWCs
may
request
from
the
EPA
or
State
with
an
approved
Title
V
program
an
extension
of
the
compliance
data
of
up
to
1
year.
An
extension
may
be
granted
if
it
can
be
reasonably
documented
that
the
installation
of
pollution
prevention
or
waste
minimization
measures
will
significantly
reduce
the
amount
and/
or
toxicity
of
hazardous
waste
entering
the
feedstream(
s)
of
the
hazardous
waste
combustor(
s),
and
that
the
necessary
control
measures
could
not
be
installed
and
the
emission
standards
and
42
operating
requirements
of
Subpart
EEE
could
not
be
complied
with
within
3
years
after
their
effective
date.

Requests
for
a
1­
year
extension
must
be
made
in
writing
and
received
not
later
than
4
months
before
the
compliance
date.
The
request
must
contain
the
following
information:

 
A
description
of
pollution
prevention
or
waste
minimization
controls,
that,
when
installed,
will
significantly
reduce
the
amount
and/
or
toxicity
of
hazardous
waste
entering
the
feedstream(
s)
of
too:
hazardous
waste
combustor(
s).
Pollution
prevention
or
waste
minimization
measures
may
include:
equipment
or
technology
modifications,
reformulation
or
redesign
of
products,
substitution
of
raw
materials,
improvements
in
work
practices,
maintenance,
training,
inventory
control,
or
recycling
practices
conducted
as
defined
in
Section
261.1(
c);
 
A
description
of
other
pollution
controls
to
be
installed
that
are
necessary
to
comply
with
the
emission
standards
and
operating
requirements;
 
A
reduction
goal
or
estimate
of
the
annual
reductions
in
quantity
and/
or
toxicity
of
hazardous
whets)
entering
combustion
feedstream(
s)
that
will
be
achieved
by
installing
the
proposed
pollution
prevention
or
waste
minimization
measures;
 
A
comparison
of
reductions
in
the
amounts
and/
or
toxicity
of
hazardous
wastes
combusted
our
installation
of
pollution
prevention
or
waste
minimization
measures
to
the
amounts
and/
or
toxicity
of
hazardous
wastes
combusted
prior
to
the
installation
of
these
measures.
If
the
difference
is
less
than
a
fifteen
percent
reduction,
include
a
comparison
to
pollution
prevention
and
waste
minimization
reductions
recorded
during
the
previous
five
years;
 
Reasonable
documentation
that
installation
of
the
pollution
prevention
or
waste
minimization
changes
will
not
result
in
a
net
increase
(
except
for
documented
increases
in
production)
of
hazardous
constituents
released
to
the
environment
through
other
emissions,
wastes
or
effluents;
 
Reasonable
documentation
that
the
design
and
installation
of
waste
minimization
and
other
measures
that
are
necessary
for
compliance
with
the
emission
standards
and
operating
requirements
of
Subpart
EEE
cannot
otherwise
be
installed
within
the
three
year
compliance
period;
and
 
The
information
required
in
63.6(
i)(
6)(
i)(
B)
through
(
D).

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
request
for
an
extension
of
compliance
data
due
to
installation
of
pollution
prevention
controls;
and
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
request
for
an
extension
of
compliance
data
due
to
waste
minimization
controls.

QUALITY
ASSURANCE
PROCEDURES
FOR
CONTINUOUS
EMISSIONS
MONITORS
USED
FOR
HAZARDOUS
WASTE
COMBUSTORS
Various
quality
assurance
requirements
are
used
to
evaluate
the
effectiveness
of
quality
control
(
QC)
and
quality
assurance
(
QA)
procedures
and
the
quality
of
day
produced
by
continuous
emission
monitoring
systems
(
CEMS)
that
are
used
for
determining
43
compliance
with
emission
standards
on
a
continuous
basis
as
specified
in
the
applicable
regulation.

QC
Requirements
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Appendix
to
Subpart
EEE,
Section
1.1,
data
collected
as
a
result
of
the
required
QC
measures
are
to
be
recorded
in
the
operating
record.

As
specified
in
Appendix
to
Subpart
EEE,
Section
3.1,
HWCS
must
develop
and
implement
a
QC
program.
At
a
minimum,
each
QC
program
must
include
written
procedures
describing
in
detail
complete,
step­
by­
step
procedures
and
operations
for
the
following
activities:

 
Checks
for
component
failures,
leaks,
and
other
abnormal
conditions;
 
Calibration
of
CEMS;
 
CD
determination
and
adjustment
of
CEMS;
 
Integration
of
CEMS
with
the
automatic
waste
feed
cutoff
(
AWFCO)
system;
 
Preventive
Maintenance
of
CEMS
(
including
spare
parts
inventory);
 
Data
recording,
calculations,
and
reporting;
 
Checks
of
record
keeping,
 
Accuracy
audit
procedure,
including
sampling
and
analysis
methods;
 
Program
of
corrective
action
for
malfunctioning
CEMS;
 
Operator
training
and
certification;
and
 
Maintaining
and
ensuring
current
certification
or
naming
of
cylinder
gasses,
metal
solutions,
and
particulate
samples
used
for
audit
and
accuracy
tests,
daily
checks,
and
calibrations
Whenever
excessive
inaccuracies
occur
for
two
consecutive
queers,
the
current
written
procedures
must
be
revised
or
the
CEMS
modified
or
replaced
to
correct
the
deficiency
causing
the
excessive
inaccuracies.
These
written
procedures
must
be
kept
on
record
and
available
for
inspection
by
the
EPA.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Develop
and
implement
a
QC
program;
 
Revise
program,
if
necessary;
and
 
Record
program
in
the
operating
record.

QA
Requirements
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Appendix
to
Subpart
EEE,
Section
1.1,
data
collected
as
a
result
of
the
required
QA
measures
are
to
be
recorded
in
the
operating
record.
44
As
specified
in
Appendix
to
Subpart
EEE,
Section
3.2,
HWCs
must
develop
and
implement
a
QA
plan
that
includes,
at
a
minimum,
the
following:

 
QA
responsibilities
(
including
maintaining
records,
preparing
reports,
reviewing
reports);
 
Schedules
for
daily
checks,
periodic
audits,
and
preventive
maintenance,
 
Check
lists
and
data
sheets;
 
Preventive
maintenance
procedures;
 
Description
of
the
media,
format,
and
location
of
all
records
and
reports;
and
 
Provisions
for
a
review
of
the
CEMS
data
at
left
once
a
year.
Based
on
the
results
of
the
review,
the
QA
plan
must
be
revised
or
updated,
if
necessary.

(
i)
Respondent
activities
 
Develop
and
implement
a
QA
plan;
 
Revise
or
update
plan,
if
necessary;
and
 
Record
plan
in
the
operating
record.

Calibration
Drift
(
CD)
and
Zero
Drift
(
ZD)
Assessment
and
Daily
System
Audit
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Appendix
to
Subpart
EEE,
Section
4,
HWCs
must
check,
record,
and
quantify
the
ZD
and
the
CD
at
least
once
daily
(
approximately
24
hours)
in
accordance
watts
the
method
prescribed
by
the
manufacturer.
The
CEMS
calibration
must,
at
a
minimum,
be
adjusted
whenever
the
daily
ZD
or
CD
exceeds
the
limits
in
the
Performance
Specifications.
If
the
ZD
and/
or
CD
exceed(
s)
two
time
the
limits
in
the
Performance
Specifications,
or
if
the
cumulative
adjustment
to
the
ZD
and/
or
CD
exceed(
s)
three
times
the
limits
in
the
Performance
Specifications,
hazardous
waste
burning
must
immediately
cease
and
the
CEMS
must
be
serviced
and
recalibrated.
Hazardous
waste
burning
cannot
resume
until
it
is
documented
that
the
CEMS
is
in
compliance
w1111with
the
Performance
Specifications
by
caging
out
an
Absolute
Calibration
Audit
(
ACA).

Thee
daily
system
audit
must
include:

 
A
review
of
the
calibration
check
data;
 
An
inspection
of
the
control
panel
warning
lights;
and
 
An
inspection
of
the
sample
transport
and
interference
system
(
e.
g.,
sample
probes,
filters,
etc.)
as
appropriate.

In
addition,
all
measurements
from
the
CEMS
must
be
retained
in
the
operating
record
for
at
least
5
years.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Check,
record,
and
quantify
the
ZD
and
CD
at
least
once
daily;
and
 
Retain
all
measurement
from
to:
CEMS
in
the
operating
record
for
at
least
5
years.
45
Performance
Evaluation
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Appendix
to
Subpart
EEE,
Section
5,
for
Carbon
Monoxide
(
CO),
Oxygen
(
O2),
and
Hydrocarbon
(
HC)
CEMS,
an
ACA
must
be
conducted
quarterly,
and
a
Relative
Accuracy
Audit
(
RATA)
must
be
conducted
yearly.
An
Interference
Response
Test
must
be
performed
whenever
an
ACA
or
a
RATA
is
conducted.
When
a
performance
fist
is
also
required
under
Section
63.1207
to
document
compliance
with
emission
standards,
the
RATA
must
coincide
with
the
performance
test.
The
audits
must
be
conducted
as
follows:

 
The
RATA
must
be
conducted
at
least
yearly.
This
requirement
applies
to
O2
and
CO
CEMS;
 
The
ACA
must
be
conducted
at
least
quarterly
except
in
a
quarter
when
a
RATA
is
conducted
instead.
This
requirements
applies
to
all
CEMS;
and
 
The
interference
response
test
must
be
conducted
whenever
an
ACA
or
RATA
is
conducted.

As
required
by
Section
63.8(
e)(
5),
HWCs
shall
furnish
the
EPA
a
copy
of
a
written
report
of
the
results
of
the
performance
evaluation
simultaneously
with
the
performance
test,
or
within
60
days
of
completion
of
the
performance
evaluation
if
no
test
is
required.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Conduct
the
ACA,
RATA
or
interference
response
test
as
applicable;
and
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
written
report
of
the
results
of
the
performance
evaluation.

Use
of
Alternative
CEMS
Spans
(
i)
Data
items
Under
Appendix
to
Subpart
EEE,
Section
6.3.5,
HWCs
may
request
approval
to
use
alternative
spans
and
ranges
for
CO,
O2,
and
HC
CEMS
to
those
specified
in
Appendix
to
Subpart
EEE,
Sections
6.3.1
through
6.3.4.
Alternate
spans
must
be
approved
in
writing
in
advance
by
the
EPA.

(
ii)
Respondent
activities
 
Prepare
and
submit
a
request
to
use
an
alternative
CEMS
span.

5.
THE
INFORMATION
COLLECTED
­­
AGENCY
ACTIVITIES,
COLLECTION
METHODOLOGY,
AND
INFORMATION
MANAGEMENT
The
following
subsections
discuss
how
EPA
will
collect
the
information,
what
activities
EPA
will
perform
once
the
information
has
been
received,
and
how
EPA
will
manage
the
46
information
it
collects.
The
subsections
also
discuss
how
the
information
collection
requirements
affect
small
entities.

5(
a).
AGENCY
ACTIVITIES
Required
Agency
activities
are
described
in
this
section.

STANDARDS
FOR
HAZARDOUS
WASTE
BURNING
CEMENT
KILNS
Cement
Kilns
with
In­
line
Kiln
Raw
Mills
 
Review
notifications
to
comply
with
the
emission
averaging
requirements
for
cement
kilns
with
in­
line
raw
mills;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

Cement
Kilns
with
Dual
Stacks
 
Review
notifications
to
comply
with
emission
averaging
requirements
for
cement
kilns
with
dual
stacks;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

COMPLIANCE
WITH
THE
STANDARDS
AND
OPERATING
REQUIREMENTS
Compliance
with
Standards
 
None.

Extension
of
Compliance
with
Emission
Standards
 
Review
requests
for
extension
of
the
compliance
date;
 
Review
progress
reports,
if
required
by
EPA;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

Changes
in
Design,
Operation,
or
Maintenance
 
Review
notifications
of
changes
in
design,
operation,
or
maintenance,
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

Applicability
of
Particulate
Matter
and
Opacity
Standards
during
Particulate
Matter
CEMS
Correlation
Tests
 
Review
PM
CEMS
correlation
test
plans;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

Alternative
Standards
for
Existing
or
New
Hazardous
Waste
Burning
Lightweight
Aggregate
Kilns
Using
MACT
47
 
Review
requests
for
approval
of
alternative
emission
standards
for
LWAKs;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

Alternative
Standards
for
Existing
or
New
Hazardous
Waste
Burning
Cement
Kilns
using
MACT
 
Review
requests
for
approval
of
alternative
emission
standards
for
CKs;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

Alternative
Particulate
Matter
Standard
for
Incinerators
with
Low
Feedrates
of
Metals
 
Review
petitions
for
alternative
particulate
matter
standard
for
incinerators
with
low
federates
of
metals,
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

Startups
Shutdown
and
Malfunction
Plan
 
Review
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plans.
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

Automatic
Waste
Feed
Cutoff
(
AWFCO)

 
Review
excessive
exceedance
reports;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

ESV
Openings
 
Review
ESV
opening
reports;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

Combustion
System
Leaks
 
Review
requests
for
approval
of
alternative
means
of
combustion
system
leak
control;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

Operator
Training
and
Certification
 
Review
operator
training
and
certification
programs;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

PERFORMANCE
TESTING
REQUIREMENTS
Data
in
Lieu
of
the
Comprehensive
Performance
Test
 
Review
requests
to
base
compliance
on
data
in
lieu
of
a
comprehensive
48
performance
test,
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

Notification
of
Performance
Test
and
CMS
Performance
Evaluation,
and
Approval
of
Test
Plan
and
CMS
Performance
Evaluation
Plan
 
Review
notifications
of
intention
to
conduct
a
performance
test;
 
Review
notifications
of
delay
in
conducting
a
performance
test;
 
Review
site­
specific
test
plans,
 
Request
additional
relevant
information;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

Notification
of
Compliance
 
Review
notifications
of
compliance,
 
Review
requests
for
a
time
extension
for
Notification
of
Compliance,
and
 
Notify
applicant
of
EPA's
determination.

Waiver
of
Performance
Test
 
Review
requests
to
waive
a
performance
test
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination
MONITORING
REQUIREMENTS
Feedstream
Analysis
 
Review
feedstream
analysis
plan,
as
requested
by
EPA.

Alternative
Compliance
Monitoring
Requirements
for
Standards
other
than
those
Monitored
with
a
CEMS
 
Review
requests
for
approval
of
alternative
monitoring
requirements,
except
for
standards
that
must
be
monitored
with
a
CEMS;
 
Review
requests
for
approval
of
a
waiver
of
an
operating
parameter
limit;
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination
for
approval
of
alternative
monitoring
requirements;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
the
EPA's
determination
for
approval
of
a
waiver
of
an
operating
parameter
limit.

CMS
Performance
Evaluations
Quality
Control
Program
 
Review
CMS
quality
control
programs;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.
49
Notification
of
Performance
Evaluation
 
Review
notifications
of
CMS
performance
evaluation.

Additional
Notification
Requirements
for
Sources
with
Continuous
Monitoring
Systems
 
Review
notifications
of
COMS
data
results
will
be
used
to
determine
compliance
with
the
applicable
opacity
emission
standard;
and
 
Review
notifications
that
the
criterion
necessary
to
continue
use
of
an
alternative
to
relative
accuracy
testing
has
been
exceeded.

Submission
of
Site­
specific
Performance
Evaluation
Test
Plan
 
Review
site­
specific
performance
evaluation
test
plans;
 
Request
additional
relevant
information;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

Reporting
Results
of
Continuous
Monitoring
System
Performance
Evaluations
 
Review
report
of
the
results
of
CMS
performance
evaluations.

DRE
 
Review
DRE
operating
parameter
limits
(
submitted
in
the
Notification
of
Compliance).

Dioxins
and
Furans
 
Review
dioxin
and
furan
operating
parameter
limits
(
submitted
in
the
Notification
of
Compliance);
 
Review
requests
to
substitute
a
different
brand
or
type
of
carbon;
 
Review
requests
to
substitute
a
different
brand
or
type
of
inhibitor;
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination
on
requests
to
substitute
a
different
brand
or
type
of
carbon;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination
on
requests
to
substitute
a
different
brand
or
type
of
inhibitor.

Mercury
 
Review
mercury
operating
parameter
limits
(
submitted
in
Notification
of
compliance);
 
Review
requests
for
approval
to
use
a
CEMS
in
lieu
of
operating
parameter
limits;
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination
on
requests
to
extrapolate
mercury
feedrate
limits;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination
for
approval
to
use
a
CEMS.
50
Particulate
Matter
 
Review
particulate
matter
operating
parameter
limits
(
submitted
in
the
Notification
of
Compliance).

Semivolatile
Metals
and
Low
Volatile
Metals
 
Review
semivolatile
metals
and
low
volatile
metals
operating
parameter
limits
(
submitted
in
the
Notification
of
Compliance);
 
Review
requests
for
approval
to
use
a
CEMS
in
lieu
of
operating
parameter
limits
 
Review
requests
to
extrapolate
semivolatile
add
low
volatile
metal
federate
limits;
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination
on
requests
to
extrapolate
SVM
and
LVM
federate
limits
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination
for
approval
to
use
a
CEMS.

Total
Chlorine
(
Hydrogen
chlorine
and
chlorine
gas)

 
Review
total
chlorine
operating
parameter
limits
(
submitted
in
the
Notification
of
Compliance);
 
Review
requests
for
approval
to
use
a
CEMS
in
lieu
of
operating
limits;
 
Review
requests
to
substitute
a
different
brand
or
type
of
sorbent;
 
Notify
applicants
of
the
EPA's
determination
on
request
to
substitute
a
different
brand
or
type
of
sorbent;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination
for
approval
to
use
a
CEMS.

NOTIFICATION
REQUIREMENTS
Initial
Notifications
 
Review
initial
notifications;
 
Review
applications
for
approval
of
construction
or
reconstruction,
as
applicable;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

Adjustment
to
Time
Periods
or
Postmark
Deadlines
for
Submittal
and
Review
of
Required
Communications
 
Review
requests
for
an
adjustment
to
time
periods
or
postmark
deadlines
for
submittal
and
review
of
required
information;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

Change
in
Information
Already
Provided
 
Review
notifications
of
changes
in
information
already
provided.

Request
to
Reduce
Frequency
of
Excess
Emissions
and
Continuous
Monitoring
System
Performance
Reports
51
 
Review
requests
to
reduce
the
frequency
of
excess
emissions
and
CMS
performance
reports;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

Waiver
of
Recordkeeping
or
Reporting
Requirements
 
Review
requests
to
waive
recordkeeping
or
reporting
requirements;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

Data
Compression
 
Review
requests
to
use
data
compression
techniques
to
record
data
on
a
less
frequent
basis,
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

RECORDKEEPING
AND
REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS
Startup,
Shutdown,
and
Malfunction
Reports
 
Review
periodic
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan,
as
applicable;
and
 
Review
immediate
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan,
as
applicable
.

Excess
Emissions
and
Continuous
Monitoring
System
Performance
Report
and
Summary
Report
 
Review
excess
emissions
and
CMS
performance
reports
and
summaries;
 
Review
requests
to
reduce
the
frequency
of
excess
emissions
and
CMS
performance
reports;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

General
Recordkeeping
Requirements
 
Inspect
and
review
files
of
all
information
(
including
reports
and
notifications),
as
necessary.

COMPLIANCE
DATE
BE
EXTENDED
TO
INSTALL
POLLUTION
PREVENTION
OR
WASTE
MINIMIZATION
CONTROLS
 
Review
requests
for
extensions
of
compliance
dates;
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

QUALITY
ASSURANCE
PROCEDURE
FOR
CONTINUOUS
EMISSIONS
MONITORS
USED
FOR
HAZARDOUS
WASTE
COMBUSTORS
Performance
Evaluation
52
 
Review
data
collected
from
CEMS
performance
evaluations;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA's
determination.

Use
of
Alternative
CEMS
Spans
 
Review
requests
for
approval
to
use
alternative
CEMS
spans
and
ranges;
and
 
Notify
applicants
of
EPA''
s
determination.

5(
b).
COLLECTION
METHODOLOGY
AND
MANAGEMENT
For
the
regulated
community,
much
of
the
ICR
activity
is
comprised
of
recordkeeping
requirements
that
are
typically
submitted
by
mail
directly
(
or
computer
files)
to
EPA
for
review.
Some
recordkeeping
information,
however,
would
also
be
kept
in
facility
files.
This
requires
the
implementing
authority
to
visit
and
collect
from
the
facility
any
information
that
needs
to
be
reviewed.

Agency
management
of
collected
information
includes
review
of
information,
making
determinations,
and
filing
and
storing
information
collected.
In
collecting
and
analyzing
the
information
required
for
HWCs,
the
Agency
uses
electronic
equipment,
including
telephone
systems,
personal
computers,
electronic
mail,
and
database
software,
as
appropriate.
EPA
ensures
the
accuracy
and
completeness
of
the
collected
information
by
reviewing
each
submittal.

5(
c).
SMALL
ENTITY
FLEXIBILITY
EPA
has
considered
the
reporting
and
recordkeeping
burdens
of
the
rule
for
small
businesses.
The
regulations
allow
much
of
the
information
requirements
to
be
kept
in
facility
records
rather
than
in
submittals
to
EPA,
thus
reducing
time
and
costs
of
providing
the
information.

Additionally,
we
have
conducted
an
incremental
assessment
of
cost
savings
or
burdens
that
may
result
from
the
interim
standards
on
six
(
6)
HWC
facilities
that
were
identified
as
small
businesses.
Based
on
the
analysis
of
available
data,
we
conclude
that
there
would
not
be
a
significant
economic
impact
to
any
of
the
potentially
impacted
small
business
combustor
companies
resulting
from
this
rule.
For
detail
of
the
analysis,
see
"
Preliminary
Impacts
Assessment
 
Interim
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
from
Hazardous
Waste
Combustors,"
dated
January
17,
2002,
in
the
docket
to
the
Interim
Standards
Rule.

5(
d).
COLLECTION
SCHEDULE
All
of
the
ICR
requirements
have
clearly
defined
reporting
schedules.
For
example,
these
include:

 
Periodic
­­
Comprehensive
performance
test
plans
and
Notification
of
Compliances
are
required
to
be
submitted
in
a
periodic,
well
defined,
manner.
 
One­
time
­­
Construction
/
reconstruction
applications,
alternative
monitoring
requests,
extension
of
compliance
waivers,
operating
limit
waivers.
53
 
Intermittent
­­
AWFCO
and
ESV
opening
reports,
test
waivers,
inhibitor
and
carbon
substitution
requests,
CEMS
evaluation
reports.

6.
ESTIMATING
THE
BURDEN
AND
COST
OF
THE
COLLECTION
6(
a).
RESPONDENT
BURDEN
EPA
estimates
the
respondent
burden
hours
and
costs
associated
for
all
the
information
collection
requirements
covered
by
this
ICR
in
Exhibit
1.
This
Exhibit
shows
for
each
activity
the
burden
hours
(
total
and
by
labor
type)
per
respondent,
as
well
as
the
overall
burden
hours
for
all
respondents.

6(
b).
RESPONDENT
COSTS
Exhibit
1
estimates
the
annual
costs
to
respondents
based
on
the
cost
of
labor,
operation
and
maintenance
(
O&
M),
and
capital.

Labor
Costs
EPA
estimates
an
average
respondent
labor
rate
(
including
fringe
and
overhead)
of
$
101.68
for
legal
staff,
$
77.35
for
managerial
staff,
$
59.51
for
technical
staff,
$
77.35
for
consultant
staff,
and
$
28.65
for
clerical
staff.
To
derive
these
rates,
EPA
referred
to
the
loaded
hourly
rates
in
other
recently
approved
ICRs.
EPA
applied
an
adjustment
factor
of
1.082
to
update
the
earlier
loaded
hourly
rates
to
reach
2003
levels
(
based
on
employment
cost
indexes
developed
by
the
U.
S.
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics,
available
at
http://
www.
bls.
gov).
These
loaded
hourly
rates
are
based
on
national
averages,
and
include
worker
benefits
(
such
as
paid
leave,
supplemental
pay,
insurance,
retirements
savings,
and
social
security).

Operating
and
Maintenance
Costs
Operating
and
maintenance
(
O&
M)
costs
are
costs
associated
with
a
paperwork
requirement
that
are
incurred
continually
over
the
life
of
the
ICR.
They
are
defined
by
the
Paperwork
Reduction
Act
as
"
the
recurring
dollar
amount
of
costs
associated
with
O&
M
or
purchasing
services."
For
this
ICR,
O&
M
costs
include:

 
Preparation
of
paper
copies
($
0.04/
page)
 
Transmission
by
U.
S.
mail
($
10/
package
via
registered
mail).
 
Recordkeeping
in
file
cabinets
 
Operation,
maintenance,
calibration,
and
testing
of
continuous
monitoring
systems
and
continuous
emissions
monitors,
with
costs
based
on
recent
quotes
from
instrument
vendors
 
Feedstream
sampling
and
analysis
·
.

Comprehensive
performance
compliance
testing,
with
costs
based
on
costs
from
54
recent
conducted
testing
programs.

Capital
/
Start
up
Costs
Capital
equipment
costs
usually
include
any
produced
physical
goods
needed
to
provide
the
needed
or
requested
information,
such
as
measuring
and
monitoring
equipment,
machinery,
and
computers.
For
this
ICR,
capital/
start­
up
costs
include:

 
Continuous
monitoring
and
continuous
emissions
monitoring
systems,
 
File
cabinets
for
records
storage,
and
 
Other
miscellaneous
equipment
items
needed
to
meet
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements.

Annualized
Capital
Costs
The
one­
time
incurred
capital
equipment
costs
have
been
annualized
over
the
expected
lifetime
of
the
equipment
using
the
standard
discounting
rate
of
7%.

6(
c).
AGENCY
BURDEN
AND
COST
EPA
estimates
the
Agency
burden
hours
and
costs
associated
with
all
the
requirements
covered
in
this
ICR
in
Exhibit
2.
EPA
Headquarters,
Regional,
and
State
offices
will
be
involved
in
these
activities.
Burden
is
due
to
the
needed
review
of
test
workplans,
petitions,
notifications,
and
requests.
Hourly
wage
rates
for
the
Agency
are
estimated
at
$
60.42
for
legal
staff,
$
38.35
for
managerial
staff,
$
26.91
for
technical
staff,
and
$
16.36
for
the
clerical
staff.
These
rates
are
based
on
the
"
General
Schedule
Salary
Table
2003,"
available
at
http://
www.
opm.
gov/
oca/
oztables/
index65.
html.

It
is
estimated
that
the
paperwork
cost
of
$
0.57
is
incurred
each
time
the
Agency
has
to
contact
a
facility
(
for
example,
to
notify
them
of
the
results
of
a
waiver
application).
This
is
based
on
$
0.37
postage
and
$
0.20
copying
charges.

6(
d).
RESPONDENT
UNIVERSE
AND
TOTAL
BURDEN
AND
COSTS
RESPONDENT
UNIVERSE
Table
1
shows
the
estimated
respondent
ICR
burden.
The
estimated
burden
and
cost
represents
the
average
burden
and
cost
incurred
by
a
facility
with
combustion
units.
Actual
burden
may
vary,
depending
on
the
number,
capacity,
and
complexity
of
the
combustion
units
at
the
facility.

UNIVERSE
DETERMINATION
number
of
hazardous
waste
combustors
subject
to
the
information
collection
requirements
of
the
HWC
MACT
Rule
covered
by
this
ICR.
The
number
of
hazardous
waste
combustors
is
based
on
various
sources,
including
recent
State
and
EPA/
OSW
Headquarters
survey
data,
industry
reports,
and
in­
house
estimates.
55
Table
1.
Existing
Combustion
Facilities
Burning
Hazardous
Waste
Combustion
Unit
Type
#
of
Units
#
of
Facilities
Cement
Kilns
25
14
Lightweight
Aggregate
Kilns
9
3
Commercial
Incinerators
22
14
On­
Site
Incinerators
105
85
Total
161
116
Additionally,
it
is
estimated
that
an
average
of
3
new
incinerators
(
no
new
CK
or
LWAKs)
will
be
operational
during
the
life
of
this
ICR
i.
e.,
the
next
3
years.
Thus
the
total
number
of
facilities
impacted
by
this
ICR
is
119.

TOTAL
BURDEN
AND
COSTS
WHO
IS
SUBJECT
TO
THESE
REGULATIONS
All
HWCs
will
read
the
regulations
at
40
CFR
Part
63,
Subparts
A
and
EEE.

STANDARDS
FOR
HAZARDOUS
WASTE
BURNING
INCINERATORS,
CEMENT
KILNS,
AND
LIGHTWEIGHT
AGGREGATE
KILNS
Emission
Averaging
for
Cement
Kilns
with
In­
line
Kiln
Raw
Mills
We
estimate
that
3
cement
kilns
with
in­
line
kiln
raw
mills
will
comply
with
the
emission
averaging
requirements
for
kilns
of
this
type.
Thus,
they
will
conduct
a
performance
test
when
the
raw
mill
is
on­
line
and
when
the
mill
is
off­
line,
and
include
the
averaging
procedures
in
their
Notification
of
Compliance
and
operating
record.
We
note
that
these
procedures
are
similar
to
that
currently
required
under
RCRA
BIF
regulations.

Emission
Averaging
for
Preheater
or
Preheater/
Precalciner
Kilns
with
Dual
Stacks
There
are
no
hazardous
waste
burning
cement
kilns
with
dual
stacks.

COMPLIANCE
WITH
THE
STANDARDS
AND
OPERATING
REQUIREMENTS
Compliance
with
Standards
It
is
estimated
that
5%
of
facilities
will
document
in
the
operating
record
compliance
with
alternative
applicable
CAA
requirements
and
standards.

Extension
of
Compliance
with
Emission
Standards
It
is
estimated
that
20%
of
all
facilities
(
23)
will
apply
for
an
extension
of
compliance
with
emission
standards,
of
which
10%
will
be
granted
extensions.
56
Changes
in
Design,
Operation,
or
Maintenance
It
is
estimated
that
50%
of
the
facilities
will
be
making
design,
operation,
and
maintenance
changes
to
comply
with
the
Interim
Standard
Rule.
These
though
will
not
initiate
additional
comprehensive
performance
testing
beyond
the
single
testing
event
that
is
required.

Use
of
Previous
DRE
Test
Results
to
Demonstrate
Compliance
with
DRE
MACT
Standards
It
is
estimated
that
all
sources
will
request
the
use
of
previous
DRE
test
results
for
demonstrating
compliance
with
the
MACT
DRE
standard.

Applicability
of
Particulate
Matter
and
Opacity
Standards
during
Particulate
Matter
CEMS
Correlation
Tests
It
is
not
projected
that
any
HWCs
will
elect
to
use
PM
CEMS.

Alternative
Standards
for
Hazardous
Waste
Burning
Lightweight
Aggregate
Kilns
using
MACT
It
is
estimated
that
1
LWAK
will
petition
for
alternative
emission
standards.

Alternative
Standards
for
Hazardous
Waste
Burning
Cement
Kilns
using
MACT
It
is
estimated
that
2
cement
kilns
will
petition
for
alternative
emission
standards.

Alternative
Monitoring
Location
for
Cement
Kilns
Burning
Hazardous
Waste
at
a
Location
Other
Than
the
Hot
End
It
is
estimated
that
1
cement
kilns
will
petition
for
an
alternative
monitoring
location
when
burning
hazardous
waste
at
a
location
other
than
the
hot
end.

Alternative
Particulate
Matter
Standard
for
Incinerators
With
Low
Feedrate
Metals
It
is
estimated
that
10%
of
the
on­
site
incinerators
(
9)
will
petition
for
an
alternative
particulate
matter
standard.

Startup,
Shutdown,
and
Malfunction
Plan
All
facilities
will
develop
a
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
plan.

Automatic
Waste
Feed
Cutoff
(
AWFCO)

It
is
estimated
that:

 
All
HWCs
will
have
1
AWFCO
per
year;
57
 
10%
of
all
HWCs
will
have
to
file
an
excessive
exceedances
report
(
i.
e.,
>
10
AWFCOs
in
any
60­
day
block
period)
per
year;
 
50%
of
facilities
will
conduct
weekly
AWFCO
system
inspections,
while
50%
will
conduct
monthly
system
testing.
 
All
HWCs
will
document
in
the
operating
record
the
use
of
ramp
down
procedures.

ESV
Openings
It
is
estimated
that
50%
of
hazardous
waste
incinerators
(
45)
have
ESVs,
and
will
develop
an
ESV
operating
plan.
On
average,
each
unit
will
have
6
ESV
openings
per
year.

Combustion
System
Leaks
It
is
estimated
that
50%
of
facilities
will
request
approval
to
use
an
alternative
means
of
control
to
provide
control
of
combustion
system
leaks.
These
facilities
must
specify
in
their
operating
record
and
comprehensive
performance
test
plan
the
method
used
for
control
of
combustion
system
leaks.

Operator
Training
and
Certification
It
is
estimated
that
all
commercial
incinerators
(
20)
and
50%
of
other
facilities
currently
have
a
sufficient
operating
training
and
certification
program.
Other
facilities
will
likely
develop
a
site­
specific
training
and
certification
program.

Operation
and
Maintenance
Plan
All
facilities
will
develop
an
operation
and
maintenance
plan.

Incinerators
and
LWAKs
with
fabric
filters,
estimated
at
30
facilities,
will
have
to
purchase,
install,
and
operate
bag
leak
detection
systems.

PERFORMANCE
TESTING
REQUIREMENTS
Comprehensive
Performance
Test
All
HWCs
will
conduct
a
single
comprehensive
performance
testing
to
meet
the
Interim
Standards
Rule.
This
testing
is
similar
to
that
required
under
current
RCRA
BIF
requirements,
and
will
impose
no
additional
burden
on
the
facility.

Data
in
Lieu
of
the
Comprehensive
Performance
Test
It
is
estimated
that
10%
of
all
facilities
will
submit
a
request
to
use
previous
emissions
test
data
to
serve
as
documentation
of
compliance
with
emission
standards.

Notification
of
Performance
Test
and
CMS
Performance
Evaluation,
and
Approval
of
Test
Plan
and
CMS
Performance
Evaluation
Plan
58
All
facilities
will
submit
a
notification
of
intent
to
conduct
a
performance
test.
These
facilities
will
also
be
required
to
prepare
and
submit
and
a
site­
specific
test
plan.

The
EPA
estimates
1
facility
per
year
will
reschedule
their
performance
test
date
and
thus
be
required
to
submit
a
rescheduled
notification
of
intent
to
conduct
a
performance
test.

Additionally,
50%
of
facilities
submitting
a
site­
specific
performance
test
plan
will
be
requested
to
submit
additional
relevant
information.

Notification
of
Compliance
All
facilities
will
submit
a
Notification
of
Compliance
every
time
they
complete
a
comprehensive
performance
test.
Waiver
of
Performance
Test
It
is
estimated
that
20%
of
facilities
conducting
the
comprehensive
performance
test
will
apply
for
a
waiver
of
the
Hg,
SVM,
LVM,
and
total
chlorine
emission
standards
every
year.
The
EPA
anticipates
that
all
applications
for
the
waiver
will
be
granted.

MONITORING
REQUIREMENTS
Continuous
Emissions
Monitoring
Systems
(
CEMS)
and
Continuous
Opacity
Monitoring
Systems
(
COMS)

All
facilities
are
already
required
to
monitor
for
carbon
monoxide
(
CO)
or
hydrocarbons
(
HC)
and
oxygen
under
current
regulatory
requirements,
thus
there
is
no
capital
investment
burden
associated
with
the
Interim
Standards
MACT
requirements.

It
is
estimated
that
all
cement
kilns
are
also
equipped
with
COMS
(
or
equivalent
devices).

Continuous
Monitoring
Systems
All
facilities
are
currently
equipped
with
all
CMS
required
with
the
MACT
Interim
Standards
Rule.
Thus,
there
is
no
capital
investment
burden.

Feedstream
Analysis
Plan
All
HWCs
already
have
developed
and
implemented
feedstream
analysis
plans
under
current
RCRA
requirements
(
referred
to
as
waste
analysis
plan).
There
is
no
incremental
burden
for
this
requirement.

Alternative
Compliance
Monitoring
Requirements
for
Standards
other
than
those
Monitored
with
a
CEMS
It
is
estimated
that
10%
of
all
facilities
will
apply
for
and
receive
approval
to
use
alternative
monitoring
requirements
to
document
compliance
with:
the
emission
standards
of
Subpart
EEE
other
than
CO
or
HC
which
are
monitored
with
a
CEMS.
59
Use
of
CEMS
in
lieu
of
Operating
Parameter
Limits;
or
Alternative
Methods
in
lieu
of
CEMS
It
is
estimated
that
no
facilities
will
make
this
request.

CMS
Performance
Evaluations
As
part
of
the
comprehensive
performance
test,
HWCs
will
submit
a
CMS
quality
control
program,
notification
of
performance
evaluation
and
additional
notification
requirements,
performance
evaluation
test
plan,
and
conduct
a
CMS
performance
test.
Also,
it
is
estimated
that
EPA
will
also
request
additional
relevant
information
for
the
site­
specific
CMS
performance
test
plan
from
10%
of
the
facilities
performing
the
test.

Destruction
and
Removal
Efficiency
It
is
estimated
that
all
currently
operating
HWCs
already
have
the
equipment
needed
for
the
MACT
DRE
monitoring
requirements.

Dioxins
and
Furans
It
is
estimated
that
all
currently
operating
HWCs
already
have
the
equipment
needed
for
the
MACT
PCDD/
PCDF
monitoring
requirements
since
they
are
under
similar
RCRA
regulations.
It
is
estimated
that
no
facilities
will
choose
to
use
a
CEMS
for
compliance
monitoring.

Mercury
It
is
estimated
that
all
currently
operating
HWCs
already
have
the
equipment
needed
for
the
MACT
Hg
monitoring
requirements
since
they
are
under
similar
RCRA
regulations.
It
is
estimated
that
no
facilities
will
choose
to
use
a
CEMS
for
compliance
monitoring.

Particulate
Matter
It
is
estimated
that
all
currently
operating
HWCs
already
have
the
equipment
needed
to
comply
with
the
MACT
PM
monitoring
requirements
since
they
are
under
similar
RCRA
regulations.
It
is
estimated
that
no
facilities
will
choose
to
use
a
CEMS
for
compliance
monitoring.

Semivolatile
Metals
and
Low
Volatile
Metals
It
is
estimated
that
all
currently
operating
HWCs
already
have
the
equipment
needed
to
comply
with
the
CAA
MACT
SVM
and
LVM
monitoring
requirements
as
they
are
currently
regulated
under
similar
RCRA
regulations.
It
is
estimated
that
no
facilities
will
choose
to
use
a
CEMS
for
compliance
monitoring.

Total
Chlorine
(
HCl
and
Chlorine
Gas)
60
It
is
estimated
that
all
currently
operating
HWCs
already
have
the
equipment
needed
for
the
MACT
total
chlorine
monitoring
requirements
since
they
are
under
similar
RCRA
regulations.
It
is
estimated
that
no
facilities
will
choose
to
use
a
CEMS
for
compliance
monitoring.

Operating
under
Different
Modes
of
Operation
It
is
estimated
that
50%
of
all
facilities
will
perform
the
comprehensive
performance
test
under
two
or
more
operating
modes.
These
facilities
will
be
required
to
document
what
operating
mode
they
are
in.

NOTIFICATION
REQUIREMENTS
Initial
Notifications
All
facilities
will
submit
an
initial
notification.
Additionally,
as
part
of
the
initial
notification,
it
is
estimated
that
5
facilities
will
apply
for
construction
approval
and
5
facilities
will
apply
for
reconstruction
approval.
EPA
anticipates
requesting
additional
relevant
information
from
each
facility.

Adjustment
to
Time
Periods
or
Postmark
Deadlines
for
Submittal
and
Review
of
Required
Communications
It
is
estimated
that
25%
of
all
facilities
will
submit
a
request
for
an
adjustment
to
a
time
period
or
postmark
deadline.

Change
in
Information
Already
Provided
It
is
estimated
that
25%
of
all
facilities
will
submit
change(
s)
to
information
already
provided.

Request
to
Reduce
Frequency
of
Excess
Emissions
and
CMS
Performance
Reports
It
is
estimated
that
10%
of
facilities
will
submit
a
request
to
reduce
frequency
of
excess
emissions
and
continuous
system
performance
reports
from
a
quarterly
(
or
more
frequent
basis).

Waiver
of
Recordkeeping
or
Reporting
Requirements
It
is
estimated
that
1%
of
all
facilities
will
submit
a
waiver
of
recordkeeping
or
reporting
requirements.

Data
Compression
It
is
estimated
that
25%
of
facilities
will
submit
a
request
for
approval
to
use
data
compression
techniques.
61
RECORDKEEPING
AND
REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS
Startup,
Shutdown,
and
Malfunction
Reports
It
is
anticipated
that
25%
of
facilities
will
take
actions
during
a
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
that
are
consistent
with
the
procedures
specified
in
the
facility's
startup,
shutdown,
or
malfunction
plan.
These
facilities
are
required
to
submit
a
periodic
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
report.
Another
10%
of
facilities
will
take
actions
that
are
not
consistent
with
procedures
specified
in
their
plans.
These
facilities
acquired
to
submit
an
immediate
startup,
shutdown,
and
malfunction
report.
Excess
Emissions
and
Continuous
Monitoring
System
Performance
Report
and
Summary
Report
It
is
anticipated
that
all
facilities
will
submit
an
excess
emissions
and
continuous
monitoring
system
performance
report
and
summary
report.

General
Recordkeeping
Requirements
It
is
estimated
that
it
will
take
40
hours
each
year
for
each
of
the
HWC
facilities
to
maintain
copies
of
all
required
information.
Additionally,
it
is
estimated
that
in
order
to
maintain
the
files,
the
facilities
will
need
to
purchase
file
cabinets,
cost
of
which
has
been
shown
in
the
exhibits.

Additional
Recordkeeping
Requirements
for
Sources
with
Continuous
Monitoring
Systems
It
is
estimated
that
it
will
take
an
additional
20
hours
each
year
for
facilities
to
maintain
copies
of
all
required
information
for
sources
with
continuous
monitoring
systems.

Documentation
of
Compliance
It
is
anticipated
that
all
facilities
will
develop
a
Documentation
of
Compliance
to
be
included
in
their
operating
records.

COMPLIANCE
DATE
BE
EXTENDED
TO
INSTALL
POLLUTION
PREVENTION
OR
WASTE
MINIMIZATION
CONTROLS
It
is
estimated
that
10%
of
HWCs
will
submit
a
one­
time
request
for
a
compliance
extension
due
to
the
installation
of
controls,
and
that
another
10%
will
submit
a
one­
time
request
for
a
compliance
extension
for
waste
minimization
purposes.

QUALITY
ASSURANCE
PROCEDURES
FOR
CONTINUOUS
EMISSIONS
MONITORS
USED
FOR
HAZARDOUS
WASTE
COMBUSTORS
Performance
Evaluation
All
HWCs
must
meet
the
QA
requirements
for
CEMS.
These
requirements
are
very
62
similar
to
those
currently
required
under
RCRA.

Use
of
Alternative
CEMS
Spans
It
is
estimated
that
no
HWCs
will
submit
requests
to
use
an
alternative
CEMS
span.

6(
e).
BOTTOM
LINE
BURDEN
HOUR
AND
COST
TABLES
Exhibit
1
shows
the
total
annual
burden
and
cost
to
the
respondents.
EPA
estimates
the
annual
respondent
burden
to
be
151,339
hours
per
year
and
a
Capital/
Startup
and
O&
M
cost
of
$
3,925,726
per
year.
The
total
burden
to
the
respondents
over
3
years
is
estimated
to
be
454,017
hours
and
a
Capital/
Startup
and
O&
M
cost
of
$
11,777,178.

Exhibit
2
shows
the
total
annual
burden
and
cost
to
the
Agency.
EPA
estimates
the
annual
burden
to
the
Agency
is
9,943
hours
per
year
and
a
Capital/
Startup
and
O&
M
cost
of
$
662
per
year.
The
total
burden
to
the
Agency
over
3
years
is
estimated
to
be
29,829
hours
and
a
Capital/
Startup
and
O&
M
cost
of
$
1,986.

6(
f).
REASONS
FOR
CHANGE
IN
BURDEN
This
ICR
consolidates
the
several
individual
ICRs
prepared
for
the
modifications
to
the
MACT
rule,
and
for
the
interim
MACT
rule
during
the
last
3
years.
Thus,
this
ICR
covers
the
respondent
burden
on
the
HWCs
based
on
the
regulations
as
they
now
exist
at
40
CFR
Part
63,
Subpart
EEE.
The
increased
PRA
burden
on
the
HWCs
covered
in
this
ICR
is
because
the
rule
will
become
effective
on
September
30,
2003,
and
the
regulated
facilities
have
to
upgrade
their
pollution
control
devices,
install
monitoring
equipment,
and
conduct
monitoring
and
recordkeeping
activities
to
ensure
compliance
by
the
effective
date,
and
subsequently
thereafter.
Even
though
the
regulations
were
issued
in
September
1999,
they
were
being
litigated,
the
effective
date
of
compliance
was
far
away,
and
the
compliance
requirements
in
this
intervening
period
were
very
little.

6(
g).
BURDEN
STATEMENT
The
average
respondent
recordkeeping
and
reporting
burden
under
this
ICR
is
estimated
to
be
1,271
hours
per
respondent
per
year
(
based
on
a
total
estimated
151,339
hours/
yr
of
recordkeeping
and
reporting
and
119
facilities
under
this
ICR).

This
breaks
down
into
recordkeeping
and
reporting
as:

 
Reporting
 
611
hours
per
respondent
per
year
(
based
on
72,757
hours/
yr
of
reporting
and
119
facilities
under
this
ICR).

Reporting
includes
time
for:
preparing
and
submitting
notifications,
requests,
petitions,
and
applications
to
comply
with
alternative
requirements;
preparing
and
submitting
reports;
and
responding
to
additional
requests
for
relevant
information.

 
Recordkeeping
 
660
hours
per
year
per
facility
(
based
on
78,582
hours/
yr
of
63
recordkeeping
and
119
facilities
under
this
ICR).

Recordkeeping
includes
time
for
retaining
copies
of
the
information
in
the
operating
record.

Burden
Statement:
Burden
means
the
total
time,
effort,
or
financial
resources
expended
by
persons
to
generate,
maintain,
retain,
or
disclose
or
provide
information
to
or
for
a
Federal
agency.
This
includes
the
time
needed
to
review
instructions;
develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purposes
of
collecting,
validating,
and
verifying
information,
processing
and
maintaining
information,
and
disclosing
and
providing
information;
adjust
the
existing
ways
to
comply
with
any
previously
applicable
instructions
and
requirements;
train
personnel
to
be
able
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information;
search
data
sources;
complete
and
review
the
collection
of
information;
and
transmit
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.
An
agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to,
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
currently
valid
OMB
control
number.
The
OMB
control
numbers
for
EPA's
regulations
are
listed
in
40
CFR
part
9.

To
comment
on
the
Agency's
need
for
this
information,
the
accuracy
of
the
provided
burden
estimates,
and
any
suggested
methods
for
minimizing
respondent
burden,
including
the
use
of
automated
collection
techniques,
EPA
has
established
a
public
docket
for
this
ICR
under
Docket
ID
No.
RCRA­
2002­
0030,
which
is
available
for
public
viewing
at
the
RCRA
Docket
in
the
EPA
Docket
Center
(
EPA/
DC),
EPA
West,
Room
B102,
1301
Constitution
Ave.,
NW,
Washington,
DC.
The
EPA
Docket
Center
Public
Reading
Room
is
open
from
8:
30
a.
m.
to
4:
30
p.
m.,
Monday
through
Friday,
excluding
legal
holidays.
The
telephone
number
for
the
Reading
Room
is
(
202)
566­
1744,
and
the
telephone
number
for
the
RCRA
Docket
is
(
202)
566­
0270.
An
electronic
version
of
the
public
docket
is
available
through
EPA
Dockets
(
EDOCKET)
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
edocket.
Use
EDOCKET
to
submit
or
view
public
comments,
access
the
index
listing
of
the
contents
of
the
public
docket,
and
to
access
those
documents
in
the
public
docket
that
are
available
electronically.
Once
in
the
system,
select
"
search,"
then
key
in
the
docket
ID
number
identified
above.
Also,
you
can
send
comments
to
the
Office
of
Information
and
Regulatory
Affairs,
Office
of
Management
and
Budget,
725
17th
Street,
NW,
Washington,
DC
20503,
Attention:
Desk
Office
for
EPA.
Please
include
the
EPA
Docket
ID
No.
RCRA­
2002­
0030
and
OMB
control
number
2050­
0171
in
any
correspondence.