Document ID: EPA-R03-OAR-2006-0840-0008
Agency: epa
Document Type: Rule
Title: Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Redesignation of the Lancaster 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area to Attainment and Approval of the Areas Maintenance Plan and 2002 Base-Year Inventory
Posted Date: 2007-07-06T04:00Z

[Federal Register: July 6, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 129)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 36889-36892]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr06jy07-13]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81

[EPA-R03-OAR-2006-0840; FRL-8333-6]

 
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Pennsylvania; Redesignation of the Lancaster 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment 
Area to Attainment and Approval of the Area's Maintenance Plan and 2002 
Base-Year Inventory

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a redesignation request and State 
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the Commonwealth of 
Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection 
(PADEP) is requesting that the Lancaster nonattainment area 
(``Lancaster Area'' or ``Area'') be redesignated as attainment for the 
8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). In 
conjunction with its redesignation request, the PADEP submitted SIP 
revisions consisting of a maintenance plan for the Lancaster Area that 
provides for continued attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS for at 
least 10 years after redesignation. EPA is approving the 8-hour 
maintenance plan. PADEP also submitted a 2002 base-year inventory for 
the Lancaster Area which EPA is approving. In addition, EPA is 
approving the adequacy determination for the motor vehicle emission 
budgets (MVEBs) that are identified in the Lancaster Area maintenance 
plan for purposes of transportation conformity, and is approving those 
MVEBs. EPA is approving the redesignation request, and the maintenance 
plan, and the 2002 base-year emissions inventory as revisions to the 
Pennsylvania SIP in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air 
Act (CAA).

DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on July 6, 2007 
pursuant to the authority of 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1).

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID 
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2006-0840. All documents in the docket are listed in 
the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the electronic 

docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e., confidential 
business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is 
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted 
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available 
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are 
available either electronically through http://www.regulations.gov or in hard 

copy for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air 
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State 
submittal are available at the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental 
Protection, Bureau of Air Quality Control, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market 
Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Wentworth (215) 814-2034, or by 
e-mail at wentworth.ellen@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    On May 15, 2007 (72 FR 27265), EPA published a notice of proposed 
rulemaking (NPR) for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The NPR proposed 
approval of Pennsylvania's redesignation request, a SIP revision that 
establishes a maintenance plan for the Lancaster Area that provides for 
continued attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS for at least 10 years 
after redesignation, and a 2002 base-year emissions inventory. The 
formal SIP revisions were submitted by PADEP on September 20, 2006, and 
supplemented on November 8, 2006.

[[Page 36890]]

Other specific requirements of Pennsylvania's redesignation request and 
SIP revision for the maintenance plan, and the rationale for EPA's 
proposed actions are explained in the NPR and will not be restated 
here. No public comments were received on the NPR.
    On December 22, 2006, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of 
Columbia Circuit vacated EPA's Phase 1 Implementation Rule for the 8-
hour Ozone Standard. (69 FR 23951, April 30, 2004). South Coast Air 
Quality Management Dist. v. EPA, 472 F.3d 882 (D.C.Cir. 2006). On June 
8, 2007, in South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. v. EPA, Docket No. 
04-1201, in response to several petitions for rehearing, the D.C. 
Circuit clarified that the Phase 1 Rule was vacated only with regard to 
those parts of the rule that had been successfully challenged. 
Therefore, the Phase 1 Rule provisions related to classifications for 
areas currently classified under subpart 2 of Title I, part D of the 
Act as 8-hour nonattainment areas, the 8-hour attainment dates, and the 
timing for emissions reductions needed for attainment of the 8-hour 
ozone NAAQS remain effective. The June 8 decision left intact the 
Court's rejection of EPA's reasons for implementing the 8-hour standard 
in certain nonattainment areas under subpart 1 in lieu of subpart 2. By 
limiting the vacatur, the Court let stand EPA's revocation of the 1-
hour standard and those anti-backsliding provisions of the Phase 1 Rule 
that had not been successfully challenged. The June 8 decision 
reaffirmed the December 22, 2006 decision that EPA had improperly 
failed to retain four measures required for 1-hour nonattainment areas 
under the anti-backsliding provisions of the regulations: (1) 
Nonattainment area nonattainment New Source Review (NSR) requirements 
based on an area's 1-hour nonattainment classification; (2) Section 185 
penalty fees for 1-hour severe or extreme nonattainment areas; (3) 
measures to be implemented pursuant to section 172(c)(9) or 182(c)(9) 
of the Act, on the contingency of an area not making reasonable further 
progress toward attainment of the 1-hour NAAQS, or for failure to 
attain that NAAQS; and (4) certain transportation conformity 
requirements for certain types of Federal actions. The June 8 decision 
clarified that the Court's reference to conformity requirements was 
limited to requiring the continued use of 1-hour motor vehicle 
emissions budgets until 8-hour budgets were available for 8-hour 
conformity determinations.
    For the reasons set forth in the proposal, EPA does not believe 
that the Court's rulings alter any requirements relevant to this 
redesignation action so as to preclude redesignation, and do not 
prevent EPA from finalizing this redesignation. EPA believes that the 
Court's December 22, 2006 and June 8, 2007 decisions impose no 
impediment to moving forward with the redesignation of this Area to 
attainment, because even in light of the Court's decisions, 
redesignation is appropriate under the relevant redesignation 
provisions of the Act and longstanding policies regarding redesignation 
requests.
    With respect to the 8-hour standard, the Lancaster Area is 
classified under subpart 2. The June 8, 2007 opinion clarifies that the 
Court did not vacate the Phase 1 Rule's provisions with respect to 
classifications for areas under subpart 2. The Court's decision 
therefore upholds EPA's classifications for those areas classified 
under subpart 2 for the 8-hour ozone standard. In its proposal, EPA 
proposed to find that the Area had satisfied the requirements under the 
1-hour standard whether the 1-hour standard was deemed to be reinstated 
or whether the Court's decision on the petition for rehearing was 
modified to require something less than compliance with all applicable 
1-hour requirements. Because EPA proposed to find that the Area 
satisfied the requirements under either scenario, EPA is proceeding to 
finalize the redesignation and to conclude that the Area met the 
requirements under the 1-hour standard applicable for purposes of 
redesignation under the 8-hour standard. These include the provisions 
of EPA's anti-backsliding rules, as well as the additional anti-
backsliding provisions identified by the court in its rulings. In its 
June 8, 2007 decision the Court limited its vacatur so as to uphold 
those provisions of the anti-backsliding requirements that were not 
successfully challenged. Therefore, EPA finds that the Area has met the 
anti-backsliding requirements, see 40 CFR 51.900 et seq.; 70 FR 30592, 
30604 (May 26, 2005), which apply by virtue of the Area's 
classification for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS, as well as the four 
additional anti-backsliding provisions identified by the Court, or 
alternatively, that such requirements are not applicable for purposes 
of redesignation. In addition, with respect to the requirement for 
transportation conformity under the 1-hour standard, the Court in its 
June 8 decision clarified that for those areas with 1-hour MVEBs, anti-
backsliding requires only that those 1-hour budgets must be used for 8-
hour conformity determinations until replaced by 8-hour budgets. To 
meet this requirement, conformity determinations in such areas must 
comply with the applicable requirements of EPA's conformity regulations 
at 40 CFR part 93.

II. Final Action

    EPA is approving the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's redesignation 
request, maintenance plan, and the 2002 base-year emissions inventory 
because the requirements for approval have been satisfied. EPA has 
evaluated Pennsylvania's redesignation request that was submitted on 
September 20, 2006, and determined that it meets the redesignation 
criteria set forth in section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA. EPA believes 
that the redesignation request and monitoring data demonstrate that the 
Lancaster Area has attained the 8-hour ozone standard. The final 
approval of this redesignation request will change the designation of 
the Lancaster Area from nonattainment to attainment for the 8-hour 
ozone standard. EPA is approving the maintenance plan for the Lancaster 
Area submitted on September 20, 2006 as a revision to the Pennsylvania 
SIP. EPA is also approving the MVEBs submitted by PADEP in conjunction 
with its redesignation request. In addition, EPA is approving the 2002 
base-year emissions inventory submitted by PADEP on September 20, 2006, 
and supplemented on November 8, 2006 as a revision to the Pennsylvania 
SIP. In this final rulemaking, EPA is notifying the public that we have 
found that the MVEBs for NOX and VOCs in the Lancaster Area 
for the 8-hour ozone maintenance plan are adequate and approved for 
conformity purposes. As a result of our finding, the Lancaster Area 
must use the MVEBs from the submitted 8-hour ozone maintenance plan for 
future conformity determinations. The adequate and approved MVEBs are 
provided in the following table:

  Adequate and Approved Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in Tons Per Day
                                  (tpd)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      Budget year                         NOX      VOC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2009..................................................     22.3     14.3
2018..................................................      9.0      7.8
------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Lancaster Area is subject to the CAA's requirements for marginal 
nonattainment areas until and unless it is redesignated to attainment.

[[Page 36891]]

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. General Requirements

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this 
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not 
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this 
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, 
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action 
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes 
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. 
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because 
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does 
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by 
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This rule also does not 
have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct 
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the 
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, 
as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 
This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does 
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship 
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, 
as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). 
This action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal 
requirement, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of 
power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule 
also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children 
from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 
23, 1997), because it approves a state rule implementing a Federal 
standard.
    In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In 
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the 
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority 
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be 
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP 
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise 
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements 
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not 
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a 
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 4, 2007. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
rule or action.
    This action, approving the redesignation of the Lancaster Area to 
attainment for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS, the associated maintenance plan, 
the 2002 base-year emissions inventory, and the MVEBs identified in the 
maintenance plan, may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce 
its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide, 
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,Volatile organic 
compounds.

40 CFR Part 81

    Air pollution control, National parks, Wilderness areas.

    Dated: June 25, 2007.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.

0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart NN--Pennsylvania

0
2. In Sec.  52.2020, the table in paragraph (e)(1) is amended by adding 
an entry for the 8-hour Ozone Maintenance Plan and the 2002 Base Year 
Emissions Inventory for the Lancaster, Pennsylvania Area at the end of 
the table to read as follows:

Sec.  52.2020  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (1) * * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Name of non-regulatory SIP        Applicable        State submittal                            Additional
            revision               geographic area          date          EPA approval date       explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan    Lancaster Area      9/20/06, 11/08/06.  7/06/07 [Insert
 and 2002 Base Year Emissions     (Lancaster                              page number where
 Inventory.                       County).                                the document
                                                                          begins].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 36892]]

PART 81--[AMENDED]

0
3. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
4. In Sec.  81.339, the table entitled ``Pennsylvania--Ozone (8-Hour 
Standard)'' is amended by revising the entry for the Lancaster, PA Area 
to read as follows:

Sec.  81.339  Pennsylvania.

* * * * *

                                                                   Pennsylvania--Ozone
                                                                    [8-Hour Standard]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Designation \a\                                     Category/classification
             Designated area             ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            Date \1\                      Type                      Date \1\                      Type
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                      * * * * * * *
Lancaster, PA: Lancaster County.........     07/06/07                 Attainment.

                                                                      * * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Includes Indian County located in each county or area, except otherwise noted.
\1\ This date is June 15, 2004, unless otherwise noted.

* * * * *
[FR Doc. E7-12850 Filed 7-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P