Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0056-6404
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2005-11-18T05:00Z

1
Cost
Analysis
of
Mercury
Monitoring
Techniques.
Draft
report
prepared
by
Arcadis
for
Dr.
Ruben
Deza,
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Washington,
DC.,
November
3,
2003.

MACTEC
Engineering
and
Consulting,
Inc.
5001
South
Miami
Boulevard,
Suite
300,
Durham,
NC
27703
°
P.
O.
Box
12077,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC
27709­
2077
919­
941­
0333
°
Fax:
919­
941­
0234
www.
mactec.
com
DATE:
February
11,
2005
TO:
Dr.
Ruben
Deza
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Clean
Air
Markets
Division
FROM:
Dr.
Arthur
Werner
MACTEC
Federal
Programs,
Inc.

CONTRACT:
Contract
No.
68­
D­
01­
003,
Work
Assignment
No.
5­
02
SUBJECT:
Costs
of
Alternative
Approaches
to
Continuous
Sampling
of
Gas­
Phase
Mercury
Emissions
from
Stationary
Sources
This
memorandum
present
capital,
operating,
and
quality
assurance/
quality
control
costs
for
monitoring
gas­
phase
mercury
emissions
from
stationary
sources
for
two
alternative
approaches
for
continuous
sampling:
continuous
emissions
monitoring
systems
(
CEMS)
and
in­
stack
sorbent
media
(
carbon
tubes).

CEMS
Capital
costs:
$
70,000.
Based
on
a
survey
of
11
manufacturers
of
14
total
and
speciating
CEMS,
Arcadis1
found
an
average
capital
cost
of
$
60,000.
In
addition,
it
is
assumed
that
each
source
would
purchase
a
Hovocal
or
Mercal
unit
to
generate
ionic
mercury
necessary
for
CEMS
calibration.
The
cost
of
either
instrument
is
$
10,000.

Operational
Costs:
$
87,000
The
operational
costs
have
two
components
Routine
maintenance
and
operation
and
QA/
QC
procedures.

Routine
maintenance
and
operation:
Based
on
information
from
CEMS
manufacturers,
Arcadis1
estimated
that
routine
operation
including
periodic
inspections,
monthly
maintenance,
and
data
compilation
and
reporting
would
require
255
technical
hours
per
year
or
$
13,515
(
at
$
53/
technical
labor
hour).
In
addition,
$
2,500
per
year
would
be
needed
for
materials
and
replacement
parts.
Annual
routine
maintenance
and
operation
costs
total
$
16,015.

QA/
QC
procedures:
Two
options
are
available
for
required
calibrations
and
system
integrity:
Option
1:
Weekly
system
integrity
with
ionic
mercury
using
Hovocal
or
similar
technique.
NIST
Standard
solution
cost
is
$
1,000
per
year.
Labor
cost
of
20
technical
hours
per
year,
$
1,060.
Daily
gas
calibration
performed
with
elemental
Hg
requires
the
utilization
of
about
three
gas
cylinders
annually,
and
the
operation
can
be
automated
with
minimal
technician
involvement.
The
estimated
cost
is
$
9,500.
Total
annual
costs
for
this
option
would
be
$
11,560.
MACTEC
Engineering
and
Consulting,
Inc.
5001
South
Miami
Boulevard,
Suite
300,
Durham,
NC
27703
°
P.
O.
Box
12077,
Research
Triangle
Park,
NC
27709­
2077
919­
941­
0333
°
Fax:
919­
941­
0234
www.
mactec.
com
Option
2:
Daily
converter
check
with
ionic
mercury
using
Hovocal.
NIST
Standard
solution
cost
is
$
7,000
per
year.
Labor
cost
60
technical
hours
per
year,
$
3,180.
No
daily
gas
calibrations
are
required.
Total
annual
costs
for
this
option
would
be
$
10,180.

RATA:
One
9­
run
RATA
per
year
required.
The
test
would
be
conducted
by
a
testing
contractor
at
a
cost
of
$
37,000.
The
plant
costs
would
be
131
technical
hours
for
procurement,
test
oversight,
and
reporting
or
$
6,943.
The
total
RATA
cost
would
be
$
43,943.
Total
QA/
QC
procedures
annual
costs
are
$
70,138
to
$
71,518
for
an
average
of
$
70,828.

Unit
operating
a
Sorbent
trap:

System:
Each
carbon
trap
will
have
a
three­
section
cartridge:
a
primary
capture
cartridge,
backup
for
breakthough,
and
a
portion
to
be
spiked
for
QA/
QC.
Two
carbon
traps
will
be
run
in
parallel
for
one
week
runs.

Capital
costs:
$
20,000
Capital
costs
for
a
trap
system
have
been
estimated
at
$
8,500.
Capital
costs
including
the
installation
of
the
two
systems
is
assumed
to
be
in
the
order
of
$
20,000.

Operational
Costs:
$
113,000
The
operational
costs
have
three
components:
routine
operational
costs,
laboratory
analysis
costs,
and
QA/
QC
procedures.

Routine
Operational
Costs:
It
is
assumed
that
removal
and
replacement
of
each
trap
will
require
4
hours
per
week
for
a
total
of
8
hours
x
52
weeks
=
416
hours
per
year
or
$
22,048.
In
addition,
it
is
assumed
that
44
technical
hours
will
be
required
to
award
the
carbon
trap
analysis
contract,
and
compile
and
submit
the
quarterly
emissions
report
at
a
cost
of
$
2,332.
Total
operating
costs
are
$
40,916
annually.

Analysis
cost:
The
laboratory
cost
quoted
in
the
Arcadis
report
to
analyze
and
replace
each
primary,
backup,
and
spiked
carbon
trap
including
shipping
an
handling
is
$
220.
For
weekly
sampling
with
two
traps
the
annual
cost
is
$
220x2x52
=
$
22,880.

QA/
QC
procedures:
One
9­
run
RATA
per
year
required.
The
test
would
be
contracted
to
a
test
contractor
at
a
cost
of
$
37,000.
The
plant
costs
would
be
131
technical
hours
for
procurement,
test
oversight,
and
reporting
or
$
6,943.
Routine
QA/
QC
checks
of
1
hours
per
week
per
trap
or
104
hours
or
$
5,512
per
year.
The
total
including
QA/
QC
requirements
RATA
cost
would
be
rounded
to
$
49,000
annually.