Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0161-0057
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2005-10-18T04:00Z

From:
Holloway,
Thomas
C.
(
Tom)
Sent:
Thursday,
June
19,
2003
11:
00
AM
To:
'
Dail.
Lynn@
epa.
gov'
Cc:
Reeves,
David
Subject:
Revised
Mag
Tape
Inputs
Here
are
the
revised
inputs
for
the
Magnetic
Tape
risk
test.
(
You
should
alread
y
have
the
supporting
data,
including
contact
reports,
memos,
and
process
diagra
ms,
which
I
provided
at
the
last
meeting.)

I
have
broken
down
the
emissions
for
each
facility
by
emission
point
using
facil
ity­
reported
information,
where
available.
I
have
also
included
NEI
data
in
a
c
ouple
of
cases:
(
1)
For
Quantegy,
I
filled
in
a
few
gaps
with
NEI
data.
(
I
also
eliminated
the
fugitive
emission
point
at
Quantegy
which
emits
styrene.
Our
contact
at
Quanteg
y
says
this
process,
which
was
a
plastic
injection
molding
process,
has
shut
dow
n.)
(
2)
For
Imation,
it
was
possible
to
segregate
the
magnetic
tape
emission
points
in
the
NEI
from
the
rest
of
the
facility
based
on
SIC
code
3695.
Since
the
emis
sion
estimates
in
the
NEI
are
comparable
to
what
we
have
from
the
TRI,
and
they
are
more
specific
to
the
magnetic
tape
process,
I
substituted
the
NEI
data
for
a
ll
of
the
TRI
data
previously
submitted.

For
Sony,
I
included
two
sets
of
emission
data:
(
1)
One
set
of
data
is
based
just
on
the
TRI
(
same
data
as
submitted
before).
(
2)
The
other
set
of
data
uses
data
from
the
Alabama
DEM
for
cobalt
and
data
fro
m
the
TRI
for
everything
else.

For
the
rest
of
the
facilities
(
JVC,
Kodak,
and
3M),
I
used
the
same
data
as
bef
ore.

Let
me
know
if
you
have
any
questions.

Tom
Holloway