Document ID: SEC-2017-1653-0001
Agency: sec
Document Type: Notice
Title: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes: National Securities Clearing Corp.
Posted Date: 2017-10-05T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46558-46559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21409]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-81774; File No. SR-NSCC-2017-015]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Securities Clearing 
Corporation; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Amend and Clarify 
a Margin Charge Relating to CNS Fails Positions

September 29, 2017.
    On August 11, 2017, National Securities Clearing Corporation 
(``NSCC'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') proposed rule change SR-NSCC-2017-015, pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ 
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\2\ The proposed rule change was published 
for comment in the Federal Register on August 24, 2017.\3\ The 
Commission did not receive any comment letters on the proposed rule 
change. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission is granting 
approval of the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81439 (August 18, 
2017), 82 FR 40176 (August 24, 2017) (SR-NSCC-2017-015) 
(``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Description of the Proposed Rule Change

    NSCC proposed to change its Rules & Procedures (``Rules'') \4\ to 
(1) amend an existing fails charge (``CNS Fails Charge'') that applies 
to each NSCC member (``Member'') as part of each Member's required 
deposit (``Required Deposit'') \5\ to the NSCC Clearing Fund; and (2) 
clarify NSCC's current practices with respect to the assessment and 
collection of the CNS Fails Charge.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Available at http://www.dtcc.com/en/legal/rules-and-procedures.
    \5\ A Member's Required Deposit is the daily margin deposit that 
Members are required to make to NSCC's clearing fund (``Clearing 
Fund''). Additional information on Required Deposits and the 
Clearing Fund can be found in NSCC's Rules. Id.
    \6\ Notice, 82 FR at 40176.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. The Required Deposit and the CNS Fails Charge

    NSCC collects Required Deposits from all Members in order to 
mitigate potential losses to NSCC associated with the liquidation of a 
Member's portfolio, if NSCC ceases to act for such Member.\7\ In order 
to calculate each Member's Required Deposit, NSCC uses a risk-based 
margin methodology comprised of a number of risk-based component 
charges, including the CNS Fails Charge.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ When NSCC restricts a Member's access to services generally, 
NSCC is said to have ``ceased to act'' for the Member. Rule 46 
(Restrictions on Access to Services) of the Rules sets out the 
circumstances under which NSCC may cease to act for a Member and the 
types of actions that NSCC may take. Rules, supra note 4.
    \8\ Notice, 82 FR at 40176.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NSCC currently calculates and collects the CNS Fails Charge from 
Members with positions that did not settle on the applicable settlement 
date (``Settlement Date'') \9\ (``CNS Fails Positions'').\10\ According 
to NSCC, NSCC imposes the CNS Fails Charge based on the Member's credit 
rating, as derived from NSCC's internal credit risk analysis (i.e., the 
Credit Risk Rating Matrix or ``CRRM''),\11\ in order to reflect the 
potential increase in credit risk from Members with a higher risk of 
default.\12\ NSCC is exposed to credit and market risks when a Member 
does not satisfy its obligation to either pay its net settlement 
proceeds or deliver its securities due by the applicable Settlement 
Date.\13\ Such exposures generally increase when the Member's risk of 
default increases, as reflected by the Member's credit rating derived 
from the CRRM.\14\ Therefore, NSCC asserts that to reduce NSCC's credit 
risk exposures and to incentivize Members to satisfy their obligations 
relating to their outstanding trades on Settlement Date, NSCC collects 
the CNS Fails Charge as part of each Member's Required Deposit.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The Settlement Date refers to the standard settlement cycle, 
as set by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which is T+2. 
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80295 (March 22, 2017), 82 
FR 15564 (March 29, 2017).
    \10\ Notice, 82 FR at 40176.
    \11\ The CRRM is a tool to help measure the credit risk that 
Members pose to NSCC. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80734 
(May 19, 2017), 82 FR 24177 (May 25, 2017) (SR-FICC-2017-006). The 
CRRM produces a rating based on a scale from 1 (the strongest) to 7 
(the weakest). Id. Members that fall within the weakest three rating 
categories (i.e., 5, 6, and 7) are placed on NSCC's ``Watch List'' 
and may be subject to enhanced surveillance or additional margin 
charges. Id. The CRRM considers factors that are designed to 
collectively reflect the financial and operational condition of a 
Member. Id. These factors include (i) quantitative factors, such as 
capital, assets, earnings, and liquidity; and (ii) qualitative 
factors, such as management quality, market position/environment, 
and capital and liquidity risk management. Id.
    \12\ Notice, 82 FR at 40176.
    \13\ Id.
    \14\ Id.
    \15\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This proposed rule change would amend the Rules regarding the CNS 
Fails Charge. Specifically, the proposed rule change would amend the 
Rules to add transparency and clarify NSCC's current practices with 
respect to the assessment and collection of this existing daily margin 
charge.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Calculation of the CNS Fails Charge

    Currently, for a Member with CNS Fails Positions, the CNS Fails 
Charge is calculated by multiplying the current market value of such 
Member's aggregate CNS Fails Positions by a percentage determined by 
the Member's CRRM rating.\17\ For a Member that is rated 1 through 4 on 
the CRRM, the CNS Fails Charge is 5 percent of the Member's aggregate 
CNS Fails Positions.\18\ For a Member that is rated 5 or 6 on the CRRM, 
the CNS Fails Charge is 10 percent of the Member's aggregate CNS Fails 
Positions.\19\ For a

[[Page 46559]]

Member that is rated 7 on the CRRM, NSCC charges 20 percent of the 
Member's aggregate CNS Fails Positions.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ Id.
    \18\ Id.
    \19\ Id.
    \20\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NSCC explains that of the 20 percent charge, 10 percent is imposed 
pursuant to Procedure XV, Section I.(A)(1)(f) of the Rules, which 
describes NSCC's current CNS Fail Charge,\21\ while the remaining 10 
percent of the charge is imposed pursuant to Procedure XV, Section 
I.(B)(1) of the Rules, which authorizes NSCC's to require Members on 
the Watch List to make additional Clearing Fund deposits as determined 
by NSCC.\22\ To clarify NSCC's current practices with respect to the 
assessment and collection of the CNS Fails Charge in the Rules, NSCC 
proposes to amend the Rules to clearly state that, for any Member that 
is rated 7 on the CRRM, the CNS Fails Charge would be 20 percent of the 
Member's aggregate CNS Fails Positions.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ Id.
    \22\ Notice, 82 FR at 40177.
    \23\ Id. NSCC states that Members which are not rated by the 
CRRM are not subject to the CNS Fails Charge; however, these Members 
can be placed on the Watch List as deemed necessary by NSCC to 
protect itself and its Members. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Detailed Description of the Proposed Rule Changes

    To effectuate the proposed change, NSCC proposes to amend Rule 1 of 
the Rules \24\ to add a definition for CNS Fails Position. The proposed 
definition would provide that the term ``CNS Fails Position'' means 
either a Long Position or a Short Position that did not settle on the 
Settlement Date.\25\ NSCC is also proposing to amend Procedure XV, 
Section I.(A)(1)(f) of the Rules to provide that a Member's Clearing 
Fund contribution shall include an amount that is calculated by 
multiplying the current market value for such Member's aggregate CNS 
Fails Positions by (i) 5 percent for Members rated 1 through 4 on the 
CRRM; (ii) 10 percent for Members rated 5 or 6 on the CRRM; or (iii) 20 
percent for Members rated 7 on the CRRM.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ Rules, supra note 4.
    \25\ Notice, 82 FR at 40176.
    \26\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Discussion and Commission Findings

    Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act \27\ directs the Commission to 
approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it 
finds that such proposed rule change is consistent with the 
requirements of the Act and rules and regulations thereunder applicable 
to such organization. The Commission believes the proposal is 
consistent with Act, specifically Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act and 
Rule 17Ad-22(e)(23)(i) \28\ under the Act, as discussed below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
    \28\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F); 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(23)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Consistency With Section 17A(b)(3)(F)

    Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act, requires, in part, that NSCC's 
Rules be designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and 
settlement of securities transactions.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change would clarify and provide additional 
transparency to NSCC members regarding NSCC's current practices 
surrounding the assessment and collection of the CNS Fails Charges 
associated with each Member. Specifically, the proposed Rule would 
clearly state that Members with a CRRM rating of 7 are charged 20 
percent of the Member's aggregate CNS Fails Positions (instead of the 
less transparent approach of charging 10 percent pursuant to the CNS 
Fails Charge and 10 pursuant to a separate Watch List charge). By doing 
so, this proposed rule change would help the Rules to be more 
transparent, accurate, and clear, which would better enable Members to 
understand their respective rights and obligations with respect to 
their NSCC membership and, in turn, support NSCC's clearance and 
settlement of securities transactions. Therefore, the Commission 
believes that the proposed rule change related to the CNS Fails Charge 
would promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of 
securities transactions, consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the 
Act.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Consistency With Rule 17Ad-22(e)(23)(i)

    Rule 17Ad-22(e)(23)(i) under the Act requires NSCC to establish, 
implement, maintain and enforce written policies and procedures 
reasonably designed to publicly disclose all relevant rules and 
material procedures.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(23)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As described above, the proposed rule change seeks to clarify in 
NSCC's Rules the current practices with respect to the assessment and 
collection of the CNS Fails Charge. Specifically, NSCC proposes to 
amend the Rules to include a definition for CNS Fails Position and 
clearly state NSCC's current practices regarding the assessment and 
collection of the CNS Fails Charge, including the percentages that NSCC 
charges Members according to their CRRM rating. In doing so, the 
Commission believes that proposed rule change would help promote 
disclosure of relevant rules and material procedures relating to the 
CNS Fails Charge, consistent with Rule 17Ad-22(e)(23)(i) under the 
Act.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Conclusion

    On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the 
proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act, in particular 
the requirements of Section 17A of the Act \33\ and the rules and 
regulations thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 
that proposed rule change SR-NSCC-2017-015 be, and hereby is, 
approved.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission 
considered the proposals' impact on efficiency, competition, and 
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-21409 Filed 10-4-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P