Document ID: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2006-0984-0114
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2007-01-19T05:00Z

Internet Daemon Owner <idaemon@mountain.epa.gov> 

06/01/2005 04:18 PM	To

James Michael/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, GailAnn Cooper/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

bcc

Subject

(151161821) F019 Comment Submission

	

11a. Mr.

12. Last Name

McNally

13. First Name

Mark

14. Job Title

Senior Technical Specialist

15. Organization

Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC

16. Address

1800 Honda Drive

17. City

Lincoln

18. State

AL

19. Zip Code

35128

20. Telephone

205-355-5000

21. Fax

205-355-5320

22. E-mail

mark_mcnally@hma.honda.com

23. Question/Comments

Regarding delisting of F019 wastes from automotive facilities engaged in

coating aluminum parts, it is not clear how, if in the future EPA
delists 

this activity, EPA would propose that facilities currently not coating 

aluminum parts would demonstrate that concentrations of constituents of 

concern would be "below 'listing' levels" prior to commencing such 

activity.  This could unnecessarily require changes in notifications of 

waste generation (EPA 8700-12 forms) and other waste management
approaches 

taken by such facilities.  

Is EPA considering an industry-wide exemption based on a review of the 

available industry data, or would facilities newly commencing coating of

aluminum parts still be required to presume that the F019 listing
applies 

to a particular waste until data is available to demonstrate that 

constituents of concern are below listed levels?  

Also, if EPA’s review of currently available data results in the
presumed 

potential for wastes from some facilities to exhibit constituents of 

concern above listed levels (e.g., as a result of chemical additions to 

the phosphating treatment process used at a particular facility), would 

EPA’s intended delisting approach consider allowing facilities to
employ a 

rebuttable presumption for such constituents of concern based on process

knowledge, similar to that for determining the halogen content of used
oil 

(cf. 40 CFR 279.44(b)(2))?

Thank you for the opportunity to comment.

Mark McNally

Senior Technical Specialist

Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC

June 1, 2005

Host Environment

HTTP_USER_AGENT

submit

Send Question or Comment

------------------------------------------------

WARNING NOTICE

This electronic mail originated from a federal government

computer system of the United States Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA).  Unauthorized access or use

of this EPA system may subject violators to criminal,

civil and/or administrative action.  For official

purposes, law enforcement and other authorized personnel

may monitor, record, read, copy and disclose all

information which an EPA system processes.  Any person's

access or use, authorized and unauthorized, of this EPA 

system to send electronic mail constitutes consent to these

terms.

------------------------------------------------

This information is for tracking purposes only.

Submitting script: /cgi-bin/mail.cgi

Submitting host: 57.69.19.30 (57.69.19.30)

Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; 

FunWebProducts; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)

Referred: http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/id/f019/f019-form.htm

TSSMS: epaoswer

Mail to File: f019.txt

------------------------------------------------