Document ID: USCG-2009-0204-0001
Agency: uscg
Document Type: Rule
Title: NPRM:  Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Mantua Creek, Paulsboro, NJ (Federal Registr Publication)
Posted Date: 2009-04-24T04:00Z

[Federal Register: April 24, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 78)]
[Proposed Rules]               
[Page 18665-18667]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr24ap09-17]                         

[[Page 18665]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2009-0204]
RIN 1625-AA09

 
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Mantua Creek, Paulsboro, NJ

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to change the drawbridge operation 
regulations of the S.R. 44 Bridge, at mile 1.7, across Mantua Creek at 
Paulsboro, NJ. This proposal would allow the drawbridge to operate on 
an advance notice basis year-round. The proposed change would result in 
more efficient use of the bridge.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before June 8, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket 
number USCG-2009-0204 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of 
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone 
number is 202-366-9329.
    To avoid duplication, please use only one of these methods. See the 
`Public Participation and Request for Comments' portion of the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on submitting 
comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed 
rule, call Gary S. Heyer, Bridge Management Specialist, Fifth Coast 
Guard District, at (757) 398-6629. If you have questions on viewing or 
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program 
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting 
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted, 
without change, to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking (USCG-2009-0204), indicate the specific section of this 
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each 
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit you comments and material 
Online (http://www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or hand delivery, 
but please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment Online 
via http://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received by the 
Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you fax, 
hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered has having 
been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the Docket 
Management Facility.
    To submit your comment Online, go to http://www.regulations.gov, 
select the Advanced Docket Search option on the right side of the 
screen, insert ``USCG-2009-0204'' in the Docket ID box, press Enter, 
and then click on the balloon shape in the Actions column. If you 
submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an 
unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for 
copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would 
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, 
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and 
material received during the comment period and may change this 
proposed rule in view of them.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble 
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, 
select the Advanced Docket Search option on the right side of the 
screen, insert USCG-2009-0204 in the Docket ID box, press Enter, and 
then click on the item in the Docket ID column. You may also visit 
either the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground 
floor of the DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
except Federal holidays or at Commander (dpb), Fifth Coast Guard 
District, Federal Building, 1st Floor, 431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth, 
VA 23704-5004 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
Federal holidays.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments received into 
any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment 
(or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, 
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice 
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008 issue of the 
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a 
request for one using one of the four methods specified under 
ADDRESSES. Please explain why one would be beneficial. If we determine 
that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and 
place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.

Background and Purpose

    The New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) is responsible 
for the operation of the S.R. 44 Bridge, at mile 1.7, across Mantua 
Creek at Paulsboro, NJ. Due to the decrease in vessel opening requests 
of the drawbridge in recent years, NJDOT requested to change the 
current operating regulations by requiring that the draw need open only 
if at least four hours advanced notice is given year round.
    The S.R. 44 Bridge has a vertical clearance of five feet above mean 
high water in the closed-to-navigation position. The existing operating 
regulation is set out in 33 CFR 117.729(b), which requires the draw to 
open on signal from March 1 through November 30 from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m., 
and shall open on signal at all times upon four hours notice.
    From the 1920s to the 1960s, Mantua Creek was the waterway route 
for commercial vessel traffic servicing refineries and factories along 
the waterfront in Paulsboro, NJ. There are no longer any commercial 
navigational interests requiring daily access upstream of the Route 44 
Bridge.
    Bridge opening data, supplied by NJDOT, revealed a significant 
decrease in yearly openings. For the years from 2003 to 2007, 
inclusive, from March 1 through November 30 between 7 a.m. to 11 p.m., 
the bridge opened for vessels 204, 206, 83, 120 and 113 times, 
respectively. (See Table A)

[[Page 18666]]

                                                                         Table A
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       MAR              APR              MAY              JUN              JUL              AUG              SEP              OCT              NOV
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                BRIDGE OPENINGS FOR 2003
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            7                 1               10               31               38               64               36               12                5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 BRIDGE OPENINGS FOR 2004
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            0                 2               28               30               42               43               35               15               11
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 BRIDGE OPENINGS FOR 2005
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            0                 1               19               27               29                7                0                0                0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 BRIDGE OPENINGS FOR 2006
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            0                 0               14               14               38               30               14                6                4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 BRIDGE OPENINGS FOR 2007
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            4                 4               13               30               17               19               26                0                0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Coast Guard proposes to amend 33 CFR 117.729(b), by revising 
the paragraph to read that the draw of the S.R. 44 Bridge, mile 1.7 at 
Paulsboro, need open only if at least four hours notice is given. The 
proposed change would result in more efficient use of the bridge.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, 
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits 
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and 
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
    We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so 
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. We reached 
this conclusion based on the fact that the proposed changes have only a 
minimal impact on maritime traffic transiting the bridge. Mariners can 
plan their trips in accordance with the proposed scheduled bridge 
openings, to minimize delays.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed 
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities.
    This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of 
which might be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels 
needing to transit the bridge from March 1 through November 30 from 7 
a.m. to 11 p.m.
    This proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on 
a substantial number of small entities because the rule only adds 
minimal restrictions to the movement of navigation, and mariners who 
plan their transits in accordance with the proposed scheduled bridge 
openings can minimize delay.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better 
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the 
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or 
options for compliance, please contact Waverly W. Gregory, Jr., Bridge 
Administrator, Fifth Coast Guard District, 757-398-6222. The Coast 
Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or 
complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule 
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications 
for federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any 
one year. Though this proposed rule will not result in such an 
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this 
preamble.

[[Page 18667]]

Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or 
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, 
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected 
Property Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize 
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045, 
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not 
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211, 
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards 
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, 
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why 
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or 
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical 
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or 
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management 
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus 
standards bodies.
    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we 
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Management Directive 0023.1, and Commandant Instruction 
M16475.D which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and 
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a 
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a 
significant effect on the human environment because it simply 
promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges. We 
seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a 
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    Bridges.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR Part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

    1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland 
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

    2. Revise Sec.  117.729(b) to read as follows:

Sec.  117.729  Mantua Creek

* * * * *
    (b) The draw of the S.R. Bridge, mile 1.7, at Paulsboro, need open 
only if at least four hours notice is given.

    Dated: April 6, 2009.
Fred M. Rosa, Jr.,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E9-9447 Filed 4-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P