Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0051-1022
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2023-08-16T04:00Z

From: 
Jones, DonnaLee <Jones.Donnalee@epa.gov>
Sent:
Friday, April 1, 2016 11:36 AM
To: 
David Ailor (dailor@accci.org) <dailor@accci.org>; KMBATTEN@suncoke.com
Cc:
Raymond, Gabrielle <graymond@rti.org>; Shappley, Ned <Shappley.Ned@epa.gov>; Lowe, Theresa <Lowe.Theresa@epa.gov>
Subject: 
FW: Coke Oven Quench Tower Testing firm and novel approach - pending EPA review for acceptability

FYI  -  Received this today from a vendor. Our testing staff will review this for its viability in our Coke ICR test request.

_____________________________________________________________
Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D 243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711  Tele:  (919)  541-5251  Fax  (919)  541-3207
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.

<< Quench Tower Probe Sampling System.pdf >>

From: Campbell, Richard L [mailto:richard.campbell@CBIFederalServices.com] 
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 10:41 AM
To: Jones, DonnaLee <Jones.Donnalee@epa.gov>
Cc: Bruffey, Chuck <Chuck.Bruffey@CBIFederalServices.com>
Subject: Coke Oven Quench Tower Testing

Dr. Jones:
I do have some experience testing quench towers in the early 2000's and am familiar with many of the problems associated with this task.
We would like to get your comments on a sampling approach for the quench tower that will allow us to sample multiple parameters at the
same time to help reduce the overall time due to the short sample durations for quenching operations. Due to safety considerations and
the necessity to constantly monitor the sample trains due to the excessive moisture content in the gas plume we would like to propose to
our client using a multiple probe assembly as shown in the attached schematic. This would allow us to sample safely from the ground and 
monitor all the sample trains as well. Please let me know if this approach would be acceptable?

Regards

Rick Campbell, QSTI
Senior Project Manager/ Business Development Coordinator
Stack Testing Services
National Air Measurements Group
Tel: 1-513-782-4515
Cell: 1-513-304-5316
Fax: 1-513-782-4807
richard.campbell@CBIFederalServices.com

CB&I
5050 Section Avenue
Cincinnati, Ohio 45212
USA
www.CBI.com