Document ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2003-0003-0015
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2003-03-12T05:00Z

Episode
6000
Data
10.00
1.00
0.10
0.01
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
BETA­
NAPHTHYLAMINE,
NG/
ULBETA­
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
1.000
0.100
0.010
0.001
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
BIS(
2­
CHLOROETHYL)
ETHER,
NG/
ULBIS(
UL
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.005
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
BUTYL
BENZYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
ULBUTYL
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
1.000
0.100
0.010
0.001
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
DI­
N­
BUTYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
ULDI­
UL
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
BIPHENYL,
NG/
ULBIPHENYL,
UL
1.000
0.500
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.050
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.005
0.010
0.005
0.001
Page
28
of
32Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
BIS(
2­
CHLOROETHOXY)
METHANE,
NG/
ULBIS(
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
BIS(
2­
CHLOROISOPROPYL)
ETHER,
NG/
ULBIS(
UL1.000
5.00
0.500
1.00
0.100
0.50
0.050
0.10
0.05
0.010
0.005
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
BIS(
2­
ETHYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE,
NG/
ULBIS(
UL
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
5.000
1.000
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
CARBAZOLE,
NG/
ULCARBAZOLE,
UL
0.500
0.500
0.100
0.100
0.050
0.050
0.010
0.010
0.0050.005
0.001
0.001
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
CHRYSENE,
NG/
ULCHRYSENE,
UL
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
DI­
N­
OCTYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
ULDI­
UL
10.00
1.000
1.00
0.500
0.100
0.10
0.050
0.01
0.010
0.005
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
DI­
N­
PROPYLNITROSAMINE,
NG/
ULDI­
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Mon
Mar
18
16:
30:
06
2002
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Episode
6000
Data
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
DIBENZO(
A,
H)
ANTHRACENE,
NG/
ULDIBENZO(
UL
0.50
5.00
50.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
DIETHYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
ULDIETHYL
UL
0.50
5.00
50.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
DIPHENYLAMINE,
NG/
ULDIPHENYLAMINE,
UL
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
HEXACHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
ULHEXACHLOROBENZENE,
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
DIBENZOFURAN,
NG/
ULDIBENZOFURAN,
UL
0.50
5.00
50.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
DIMETHYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
ULDIMETHYL
UL
0.50
5.00
50.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
FLUORANTHENE,
NG/
ULFLUORANTHENE,
UL
0.50
5.00
50.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE,
NG/
ULHEXACHLOROBUTADIENE,
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
Page
29
of
32Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
DIBENZOTHIOPHENE,
NG/
ULDIBENZOTHIOPHENE,
UL
0.50
5.00
50.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
DIPHENYL
ETHER,
NG/
ULDIPHENYL
UL
0.50
5.00
50.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
FLUORENE,
NG/
ULFLUORENE,
UL
0.50
5.00
50.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE,
NG/
ULHEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE,
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.005
0.05
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.005
0.001
0.05
10.00
1.00
0.10
0.01
0.01
5.000
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.005
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.005
0.001
0.05
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.005
0.05
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.005
0.05
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.005
1.000
0.100
0.010
0.001
0.05
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.005
0.05
10.000
1.000
0.100
0.010
0.001
0.05
10.00
5.00
1.00
0.50
0.10
0.05
0.01
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Mon
Mar
18
16:
30:
20
2002
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Episode
6000
Data
1.000
1.00
0.50
0.10
0.05
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
HEXACHLOROETHANE,
NG/
ULHEXACHLOROETHANE,
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
10.00
1.00
0.10
0.01
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
N­
DECANE,
NG/
ULN­
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
5.000
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.005
0.001
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
N­
EICOSANE,
NG/
ULN­
UL
10.00
1.00
0.10
0.01
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
N­
NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE,
NG/
ULN­
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
10.00
1.00
0.10
0.01
0.05
10.00
1.00
0.10
0.01
0.01
10.00
1.00
0.10
0.01
0.01
5.000
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.005
0.500
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.005
Page
30
of
32Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
ISOPHORONE,
NG/
ULISOPHORONE,
UL
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
N­
DOCOSANE,
NG/
ULN­
UL
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.005
0.001
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
N­
DODECANE,
NG/
ULN­
UL
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
N­
HEXACOSANE,
NG/
ULN­
UL
5.000
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.005
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
N­
HEXADECANE,
NG/
ULN­
UL
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
N­
NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE,
NG/
ULN­
UL
10.00
1.00
0.10
0.01
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
N­
OCTACOSANE,
NG/
ULN­
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
INDENO(
1,2,3­
CD)
PYRENE,
NG/
ULINDENO(
UL
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Mon
Mar
18
16:
30:
35
2002
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Episode
6000
Data
10.00
1.00
0.10
0.01
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
N­
OCTADECANE,
NG/
ULN­
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
1.000
0.100
0.010
0.001
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
N­
TRIACONTANE,
NG/
ULN­
UL
5.000
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.005
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
P­
CYMENE,
NG/
ULP­
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.005
0.001
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
PHENOL,
NG/
ULPHENOL,
UL
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.005
0.001
0.01
5.000
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.005
0.001
0.01
1.00
0.50
0.10
0.05
0.01
0.05
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.005
5.000
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.005
0.001
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Page
31
of
32Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
N­
TETRADECANE,
NG/
ULN­
UL
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
NAPHTHALENE,
NG/
ULNAPHTHALENE,
UL
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.005
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
NITROBENZENE,
NG/
ULNITROBENZENE,
UL
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
PENTACHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
ULPENTACHLOROPHENOL,
UL
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.050
0.010
0.005
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
PHENANTHRENE,
NG/
ULPHENANTHRENE,
UL
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
PHENOL,
2­
METHYL­
4,6­
DINITRO­,
NG/
ULPHENOL,
UL
1.000
0.100
0.010
0.001
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
PYRENE,
NG/
ULPYRENE,
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
N­
TETRACOSANE,
NG/
ULN­
UL
Mon
Mar
18
16:
30:
49
2002
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Episode
6000
Data
Page
32
of
32Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

1.000
0.100
0.010
0.001
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000Organics,
1000
STYRENE,
NG/
ULSTYRENE,
UL
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Mon
Mar
18
16:
31:
04
2002
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Lab:
8Lab:
8
ALUMINUM,
UG/
LALUMINUM,
L
100
50
20
30
40
50
Lab:
7Lab:
7
ALUMINUM,
UG/
LALUMINUM,
L
60
60
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
70
Lab:
6Lab:
6
ALUMINUM,
UG/
LALUMINUM,
L
0.1
Lab:
5Lab:
5
ALUMINUM,
UG/
LALUMINUM,
L
Lab:
4Lab:
4
ALUMINUM,
UG/
LALUMINUM,
L
20
30
20
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
300
Lab:
3Lab:
3
ALUMINUM,
UG/
LALUMINUM,
L
0.1
9
10
50
8
60
Lab:
2Lab:
2
ALUMINUM,
UG/
LALUMINUM,
L
9
10
70
20
90
80
Lab:
1Lab:
1
ALUMINUM,
UG/
LALUMINUM,
L
100
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Page
1
of
13AAMA
Metals
Data
APPENDIX
B
­
4
­
2
Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Lab:
9Lab:
9
ALUMINUM,
UG/
LALUMINUM,
L
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
Lab:
9Lab:
9
ARSENIC,
UG/

LARSENIC,
L
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
49
2002
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
20
1
20
30
5
10
Lab:
8Lab:
8
ARSENIC,
UG/

LARSENIC,
L
30
Lab:
7Lab:
7
ARSENIC,
UG/

LARSENIC,
L
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
40
Lab:
6Lab:
6
ARSENIC,
UG/

LARSENIC,
L
0.1
7
1
20
8
Lab:
5Lab:
5
ARSENIC,
UG/

LARSENIC,
L
9
Lab:
4Lab:
4
ARSENIC,
UG/

LARSENIC,
L
10
5
30
40
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
50
Lab:
3Lab:
3
ARSENIC,
UG/

LARSENIC,
L
0.1
73
30
8
4
9
Lab:
1Lab:
1
ARSENIC,
UG/

LARSENIC,
L
40
10
5
6
50
Lab:
2Lab:
2
ARSENIC,
UG/

LARSENIC,
L
7
70
8
60
9
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
2
of
13Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
DeviationAAMA
Metals
Data
Page
3
of
13
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

6
4.0
3.0
Lab:
1Lab:
1
CADMIUM,
UG/
LCADMIUM,
L
5
1.0
2.0
4
Lab:
2Lab:
2
CADMIUM,
UG/
LCADMIUM,
L
0.5
3
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
Lab:
3Lab:
3
CADMIUM,
UG/
LCADMIUM,
L
Lab:
5Lab:
5
CADMIUM,
UG/
LCADMIUM,
L
5.0
10
1.0
9
8
1.07
Lab:
4Lab:
4
CADMIUM,
UG/
LCADMIUM,
L
0.5
6
0.5
5
Lab:
6Lab:
6
CADMIUM,
UG/
LCADMIUM,
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
5.0
Lab:
8Lab:
8
CADMIUM,
UG/
LCADMIUM,
L
5.0
3.0
Lab:
7Lab:
7
CADMIUM,
UG/
LCADMIUM,
L
4.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
Lab:
9Lab:
9
CADMIUM,
UG/
LCADMIUM,
L
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.5
0.8
0.7
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
51
2002
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
2
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
53
2002
3
3
Lab:
8Lab:
8
CHROMIUM,
UG/

LCHROMIUM,
L
4
Lab:
7Lab:
7
CHROMIUM,
UG/

LCHROMIUM,
L
3
5
4
4
6
5
7
6
5
8
7
6
9
8
7
10
9
8
10
Lab:
9Lab:
9
CHROMIUM,
UG/

LCHROMIUM,
L9
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
10
Lab:
6Lab:
6
CHROMIUM,
UG/

LCHROMIUM,
L
0.1
1
5
Lab:
4Lab:
4
CHROMIUM,
UG/

LCHROMIUM,
L
1
6
7
9
2
8
10
3
Lab:
5Lab:
5
CHROMIUM,
UG/

LCHROMIUM,
L
4
5
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
Lab:
3Lab:
3
CHROMIUM,
UG/

LCHROMIUM,
L
0.1
6
Lab:
2Lab:
2
CHROMIUM,
UG/

LCHROMIUM,
L
0.5
1.0
7
5
8
Lab:
1Lab:
1
CHROMIUM,
UG/

LCHROMIUM,
L
10
5.0
9
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
4
of
13Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
55
2002
Lab:
9Lab:
9
COPPER,
UG/

LCOPPER,
L
0.1
5
3
10
4
5
5
6
7
8
Lab:
8Lab:
8
COPPER,
UG/

LCOPPER,
L
50
Lab:
7Lab:
7
COPPER,
UG/

LCOPPER,
L
10
9
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
10
Lab:
6Lab:
6
COPPER,
UG/

LCOPPER,
L
0.1
0.9
Lab:
4Lab:
4
COPPER,
UG/

LCOPPER,
L
1.0
40
2.0
2
3
3.0
5
4
4.0
6
Lab:
5Lab:
5
COPPER,
UG/

LCOPPER,
L
5.0
7
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
8
Lab:
3Lab:
3
COPPER,
UG/

LCOPPER,
L
0.1
Lab:
2Lab:
2
COPPER,
UG/

LCOPPER,
L
0.5
1
1.0
2
3
Lab:
1Lab:
1
COPPER,
UG/

LCOPPER,
L
5
4
10
6
5
7
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
5
of
13Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
Lab:
9Lab:
9
LEAD,
UG/
LLEAD,
L
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
57
2002
Lab:
8Lab:
8
LEAD,
UG/
LLEAD,
L
10
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
8
9
10
5
20
10
Lab:
7Lab:
7
LEAD,
UG/
LLEAD,
L
20
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Lab:
6Lab:
6
LEAD,
UG/
LLEAD,
L
0.1
Lab:
5Lab:
5
LEAD,
UG/
LLEAD,
L
6
Lab:
4Lab:
4
LEAD,
UG/
LLEAD,
L
0.5
20
7
9
1.0
8
10
30
20
5.0
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
10.0
Lab:
3Lab:
3
LEAD,
UG/
LLEAD,
L
0.1
10
6
7
50
10
9
8
Lab:
2Lab:
2
LEAD,
UG/
LLEAD,
L
5
100
Lab:
1Lab:
1
LEAD,
UG/
LLEAD,
L
10
20
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
6
of
13Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
59
2002
Lab:
9Lab:
9
MANGANESE,
UG/

LMANGANESE,
L
Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.7
0.8
0.9
Lab:
8Lab:
8
MANGANESE,
UG/

LMANGANESE,
L
2
1.0
3
0.5
1.0
5
4
Lab:
7Lab:
7
MANGANESE,
UG/

LMANGANESE,
L
2.0
Lab:
6Lab:
6
MANGANESE,
UG/

LMANGANESE,
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.9
5
1.0
10
0.5
50
1.0
2.0
3.0
Lab:
5Lab:
5
MANGANESE,
UG/

LMANGANESE,
L
4.0
Lab:
4Lab:
4
MANGANESE,
UG/

LMANGANESE,
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100
0.1
6
0.9
1.0
Lab:
3Lab:
3
MANGANESE,
UG/

LMANGANESE,
L
0.5
Lab:
2Lab:
2
MANGANESE,
UG/

LMANGANESE,
L
Lab:
1Lab:
1
MANGANESE,
UG/

LMANGANESE,
L
1.0
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
7
of
13
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
Lab:
9Lab:
9
MERCURY,
UG/

LMERCURY,
L
Wed
Mar
20
13:
33:
01
2002
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.04
0.07
0.05
0.06
0.05
0.05
0.08
Lab:
7Lab:
7
MERCURY,
UG/

LMERCURY,
L
0.10
0.09
0.10
Lab:
8Lab:
8
MERCURY,
UG/

LMERCURY,
L
0.10
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.20
Lab:
6Lab:
6
MERCURY,
UG/

LMERCURY,
L
0.001
0.5
0.06
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.10
Lab:
5Lab:
5
MERCURY,
UG/

LMERCURY,
L
1.0
0.20
0.05
Lab:
4Lab:
4
MERCURY,
UG/

LMERCURY,
L
0.10
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.30
Lab:
3Lab:
3
MERCURY,
UG/

LMERCURY,
L
0.001
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.10
Lab:
2Lab:
2
MERCURY,
UG/

LMERCURY,
L
0.10
0.06
0.07
Lab:
1Lab:
1
MERCURY,
UG/

LMERCURY,
L
0.08
0.50
0.09
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
8
of
13Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
Wed
Mar
20
13:
33:
03
2002
Lab:
9Lab:
9
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/

LMOLYBDENUM,
L
0.1
0.6
4
0.7
0.8
0.9
5
1.0
6
7
8
Lab:
8Lab:
8
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/

LMOLYBDENUM,
L
9
2.0
10
3.0
Lab:
6Lab:
6
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/

LMOLYBDENUM,
L
4.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5
Lab:
5Lab:
5
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/

LMOLYBDENUM,
L
10
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5.0
Lab:
3Lab:
3
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/

LMOLYBDENUM,
L
0.1
0.5
Lab:
2Lab:
2
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/

LMOLYBDENUM,
L
1.0
20
5.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
10.0
Lab:
7Lab:
7
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/

LMOLYBDENUM,
L
0.1
6
7
9
8
Lab:
4Lab:
4
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/

LMOLYBDENUM,
L
10
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
7
9
8
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
10
0.1
3
4
Lab:
1Lab:
1
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/

LMOLYBDENUM,
L
5
Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
9
of
13
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
DeviationAAMA
Metals
Data
Page
10
of
13
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)
4.0
4
3.0
50
3
Lab:
1Lab:
1
NICKEL,
UG/
LNICKEL,
L
Lab:
2Lab:
2
NICKEL,
UG/
LNICKEL,
L
2.0
1.02
0.9
0.8
10
0.7
0.6
Lab:
3Lab:
3
NICKEL,
UG/
LNICKEL,
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
Lab:
4Lab:
4
NICKEL,
UG/
LNICKEL,
L
5
30
Lab:
5Lab:
5
NICKEL,
UG/
LNICKEL,
L
100
50
20
Lab:
6Lab:
6
NICKEL,
UG/
LNICKEL,
L
1
10
5
10
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
10
5
10
9
4
Lab:
7Lab:
7
NICKEL,
UG/
LNICKEL,
L
5
Lab:
8Lab:
8
NICKEL,
UG/
LNICKEL,
L
8
7
6
35
4
1
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
Lab:
9Lab:
9
NICKEL,
UG/
LNICKEL,
L
Wed
Mar
20
13:
33:
05
2002
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
Wed
Mar
20
13:
33:
07
2002
0.1
30
20
40
5
50
30
60
10
70
Lab:
9Lab:
9
SELENIUM,
UG/
LSELENIUM,
L
40
50
80
90
Lab:
8Lab:
8
SELENIUM,
UG/
LSELENIUM,
L
100
Lab:
7Lab:
7
SELENIUM,
UG/
LSELENIUM,
L
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
60
Lab:
6Lab:
6
SELENIUM,
UG/
LSELENIUM,
L
0.1
10
5
50
5
40
50
Lab:
5Lab:
5
SELENIUM,
UG/
LSELENIUM,
L
100
Lab:
4Lab:
4
SELENIUM,
UG/
LSELENIUM,
L
10
60
Lab:
3Lab:
3
SELENIUM,
UG/
LSELENIUM,
L
70
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
7
Lab:
2Lab:
2
SELENIUM,
UG/
LSELENIUM,
L
5
Lab:
1Lab:
1
SELENIUM,
UG/
LSELENIUM,
L
8
9
50
10
100
10
20
30
40
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
11
of
13Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
Wed
Mar
20
13:
33:
09
2002
Lab:
9Lab:
9
SILVER,
UG/

LSILVER,
L
0.1
0.5
3
0.5
1.0
1.0
4
Lab:
8Lab:
8
SILVER,
UG/

LSILVER,
L
5.0
Lab:
7Lab:
7
SILVER,
UG/

LSILVER,
L
Lab:
6Lab:
6
SILVER,
UG/

LSILVER,
L
5
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
40
5
Lab:
5Lab:
5
SILVER,
UG/

LSILVER,
L
10
0.5
1.0
Lab:
4Lab:
4SILVER,
UG/

LSILVER,
L
50
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
Lab:
3Lab:
3
SILVER,
UG/

LSILVER,
L
0.1
0.5
1
0.9
0.6
1.0
0.7
0.9
0.8
1.0
5
Lab:
2Lab:
2
SILVER,
UG/

LSILVER,
L
2.0
Lab:
1Lab:
1
SILVER,
UG/

LSILVER,
L
10
2.0
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
12
of
13Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
Lab:
9Lab:
9
ZINC,
UG/
LZINC,
L
Wed
Mar
20
13:
33:
11
2002
6
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
10
7
8
Lab:
7Lab:
7
ZINC,
UG/
LZINC,
L
5
9
10
Lab:
8Lab:
8
ZINC,
UG/
LZINC,
L
50
10
Lab:
6Lab:
6
ZINC,
UG/
LZINC,
L
100
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
1
Lab:
4Lab:
4
ZINC,
UG/
LZINC,
L
1
7
8
9
10
2
3
20
30
5
4
40
Lab:
5Lab:
5
ZINC,
UG/
LZINC,
L
5
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
10
Lab:
3Lab:
3
ZINC,
UG/
LZINC,
L
0.1
2
2
3
3
44
50
Lab:
2Lab:
2
ZINC,
UG/
LZINC,
L
5
Lab:
1Lab:
1
ZINC,
UG/
LZINC,
L
5
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
13
of
13Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Episode
6000
Data
APPENDIX
B
­
5
­
1
Page
1
of
32Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

Relative
Standard
Deviation
20
15
10
5
0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Classicals,
Method
130.2Classicals,
130.2
HARDNESS,
MG/
LHARDNESS,
L
20
15
10
5
Classicals,
Method
350.3Classicals,
350.3
AMMONIA
AS
NITROGEN,
MG/
LAMMONIA
L
­
3.0
­
2.5
­
2.0
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
50
40
30
20
10
0
01234
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MSMetals,
MS
Cd
111,
pptCd
ppt
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
01234
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MSMetals,
MS
Pb
206,
pptPb
ppt
50
40
30
20
10
0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Classicals,
Method
160.2Classicals,
160.2
TOTAL
SUSPENDED
SOLIDS,
MG/
LTOTAL
L
80
60
40
20
0
­
2.0
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
Classicals,
Method
365.2Classicals,
365.2
TOTAL
PHOSPHORUS,
MG/
LTOTAL
L
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
01234
(
o)
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MSMetals,
MS
Cu
63,
pptCu
ppt
open
circle:
postitive
of
negative
RSD
value
100
80
60
40
20
0
01234
(
o)
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MSMetals,
MS
Pb
207,
pptPb
ppt
open
circle:
postitive
of
negative
RSD
value
50
40
30
20
10
0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
(
o)
(
o)
(
o)
Classicals,
Method
1677Classicals,
1677
WAD
CYANIDE,
UG/
LWAD
L
open
circle:
postitive
of
negative
RSD
value
80
60
40
20
0
01234
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MSMetals,
MS
Ag
107,
pptAg
ppt
150
100
50
0
01234
(
o)
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MSMetals,
MS
Ni
60,
pptNi
ppt
open
circle:
postitive
of
negative
RSD
value
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
01234
(
o)
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MSMetals,
MS
Pb
208,
pptPb
ppt
open
circle:
postitive
of
negative
RSD
value
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
Episode
6000
Data
Page
2
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

80
60
40
20
0
150
100
50
0
80
60
40
20
0
60
40
20
0
Metals,
Method:
ICP/
MSMetals,
MS
Sb
123,
UG/
LSb
L
(
o)
Metals,
Method:
ICP/
MSMetals,
MS
Se
82,
UG/
LSe
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
6000
4000
2000
0
01234
01234
15000
10000
5000
0
0
1
2
3
4
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
(
o)
(
o)(
o)
(
o)(
o)(
o)(
o)
(
o)
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
CADMIUM,
UG/
LCADMIUM,
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
(
o)
(
o)(
o)
(
o)
(
o)(
o)
(
o)
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
LMOLYBDENUM,
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
3000
2000
1000
0
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
(
o)
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
ARSENIC,
UG/
LARSENIC,
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
Metals,
Method:
ICP/
MSMetals,
MS
Zn
66,
UG/
LZn
L
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
LEAD,
UG/
LLEAD,
L
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
ANTIMONY,
UG/
LANTIMONY,
L
150
100
50
0
01234
Metals,
Method:
ICP/
MSMetals,
MS
Tl
205,
UG/
LTl
L
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
CHROMIUM,
UG/
LCHROMIUM,
L
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
(
o)(
o)(
o)
(
o)
(
o)
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
TIN,
UG/
LTIN,
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
150
100
50
0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
(
o)
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
SELENIUM,
UG/
LSELENIUM,
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Tue
May
7
16:
43:
23
2002
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Episode
6000
Data
Page
3
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

500
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
THALLIUM,
UG/
LTHALLIUM,
L
2000
400
1500
300
1000
200
500
100
00
(
o)
(
o)
(
o)

(
o)
(
o)

(
o)
(
o)
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
ALUMINUM,
UG/
LALUMINUM,
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
800
600
400
200
0
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
(
o)(
o)
(
o)
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
BARIUM,
UG/
LBARIUM,
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
150
100
50
0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
CALCIUM,
UG/
LCALCIUM,
L
500
400
300
200
100
0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
IRON,
UG/
LIRON,
L
80
60
40
20
0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
NICKEL,
UG/
LNICKEL,
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
(
o)(
o)(
o)
(
o)
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
BERYLLIUM,
UG/
LBERYLLIUM,
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
400
300
200
100
0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
COBALT,
UG/
LCOBALT,
L
100
80
60
40
20
0
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
MAGNESIUM,
UG/
LMAGNESIUM,
L
80
60
40
20
0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
(
o)
(
o)

(
o)
(
o)

(
o)
(
o)
(
o)
(
o)

(
o)
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
BORON,
UG/
LBORON,
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
200
150
100
50
0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
(
o)

(
o)
(
o)
(
o)
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
COPPER,
UG/
LCOPPER,
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
MANGANESE,
UG/
LMANGANESE,
L
Tue
May
7
16:
43:
37
2002
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
­
3­
2­
1
0
0
100
200
300
400
(
o)
(
o)
(
o)
(
o)

(
o)
(
o)
(
o)
Metals,
Method:
200.8Metals,
200.8
ARSENIC,
UG/
LARSENIC,
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
500
­
101
2
0
100
200
(
o)
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
ZINC,
UG/
LZINC,
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
300
0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
100
200
300
400
500
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
TITANIUM,
UG/
LTITANIUM,
L
600
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
Metals,
Method:
200.8Metals,
200.8
BERYLLIUM,
UG/
LBERYLLIUM,
L
120
0
­
2­
101
­
2
­
1
0
10
0
20
20
60
30
40
80
40
100
50
Metals,
Method:
200.8Metals,
200.8
BARIUM,
UG/
LBARIUM,
L
60
Metals,
Method:
200.8Metals,
200.8
ANTIMONY,
UG/
LANTIMONY,
L
1
2
3
­
2­
101
0
Metals,
Method:
200.8Metals,
200.8
ALUMINUM,
UG/
LALUMINUM,
L
0
20
0
40
50
60
100
150
80
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
YTTRIUM,
UG/
LYTTRIUM,
L
200
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.0
0
100
20
0
40
(
o)
(
o)
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
VANADIUM,
UG/
LVANADIUM,
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
60
80
200
300
400
100
(
o)
(
o)
(
o)
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
SODIUM,
UG/
LSODIUM,
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
120
0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
0
2000
2000
6000
4000
4000
8000
(
o)
(
o)
Metals,
Method:
1620Metals,
1620
SILVER,
UG/
LSILVER,
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
10000
6000
12000
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

140
Episode
6000
Data
Page
4
of
32
(
o)
(
o)
(
o)

(
o)
(
o)(
o)(
o)
(
o)
Metals,
Method:
200.8Metals,
200.8
CADMIUM,
UG/
LCADMIUM,
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Tue
May
7
16:
43:
51
2002
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
(
o)
(
o)(
o)(
o)(
o)
(
o)

­
3
­
2
­
1
0
0
20
40
60
80
Metals,
Method:
200.8Metals,
200.8
COBALT,
UG/
LCOBALT,
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
2
­
1
0
1
0
50
100
150
Metals,
Method:
200.8Metals,
200.8
COPPER,
UG/
LCOPPER,
L
­
3
­
2
­
1
0
0
20
40
60
80
Metals,
Method:
200.8Metals,
200.8
MANGANESE,
UG/
LMANGANESE,
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
0
10
20
30
40
50
Metals,
Method:
200.8Metals,
200.8
MERCURY,
UG/
LMERCURY,
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
0
50
100
150
Metals,
Method:
200.8Metals,
200.8
NICKEL,
UG/
LNICKEL,
L
(
o)
(
o)

(
o)(
o)(
o)
(
o)

­
1
0
1
2
0
200
400
600
800
Metals,
Method:
200.8Metals,
200.8
SELENIUM,
UG/
LSELENIUM,
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)
(
o)
(
o)

­
4
­
3
­
2
­
1
0
20
40
60
Metals,
Method:
200.8Metals,
200.8
THALLIUM,
UG/
LTHALLIUM,
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
3
­
2
­
1
0
0
5
10
15
20
Metals,
Method:
200.8Metals,
200.8
THORIUM,
UG/
LTHORIUM,
L
20
30
­
2­
1
0
40
(
o)
(
o)
Metals,
Method:
200.8Metals,
200.8
SILVER,
UG/
LSILVER,
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
3
10
20
30
40
(
o)
(
o)(
o)
(
o)

(
o)
Metals,
Method:
200.8Metals,
200.8
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
LMOLYBDENUM,
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
50
­
3­
2­
1
0
0
50
100
Metals,
Method:
200.8Metals,
200.8
LEAD,
UG/
LLEAD,
L
150
­
10
1
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
­
2­
10
1
140
0
Metals,
Method:
200.8Metals,
200.8
CHROMIUM,
UG/
LCHROMIUM,
L
10
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
5
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Tue
May
7
16:
44:
05
2002
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
(
o)
(
o)
(
o)

­
4
­
3
­
2
­
1
0
10
20
30
40
Metals,
Method:
200.8Metals,
200.8
URANIUM,
UG/
LURANIUM,
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)
(
o)(
o)(
o)(
o)
(
o)
(
o)

­
1
0
1
2
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Metals,
Method:
200.8Metals,
200.8
VANADIUM,
UG/
LVANADIUM,
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Metals,
Method:
200.8Metals,
200.8
ZINC,
UG/
LZINC,
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0
20
40
60
80
100
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
1,1,1,2­
TETRACHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L1,1,1,2­
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
1,1,1­
TRICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L1,1,1­
L
­
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
1,1,2,2­
TCE+
1,2,3­
TCP,
UG/
L1,1,2,2­
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
1,1,2­
TRICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L1,1,2­
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
1,1­
DICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L1,1­
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
1,1­
DICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L1,1­
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L1,2,3­
L
­
3
­
2
­
1
0
1
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
1,2,4­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L1,2,4­
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
1,2­
DIBROMOETHANE,
UG/
L1,2­
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
6
of
32
Tue
May
7
16:
44:
20
2002
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
0
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
2
1
1
2
3
4
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
LBROMODICHLOROMETHANE,
L
3
6
5
4
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
7
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
BROMOBENZENE,
UG/
LBROMOBENZENE,
L
­
1.0
2
10
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
4­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L4­
L
4
6
20
8
30
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
40
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
1,4­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L1,4­
L
­
1.0
10
20
5
30
10
15
20
40
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L1,3­
L
50
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
25
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
1,2­
DICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L1,2­
L
­
1.0
10
20
10
30
20
40
30
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
1,2­
DICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L1,2­
L
40
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
LBROMOCHLOROMETHANE,
L
50
0
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1
2
3
4
5
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
6
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
2­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L2­
L
­
1.0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
1,3­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L1,3­
L
20
0
­
2.0
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
2
4
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
1,2­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L1,2­
L
6
0
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
20
40
60
80
100
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

Relative
Standard
Deviation
120
Episode
6000
Data
Page
7
of
32
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
BROMOFORM,
UG/
LBROMOFORM,
L
Tue
May
7
16:
44:
33
2002
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Episode
6000
Data
Page
8
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

Relative
Standard
Deviation
5
4
3
2
1
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
BROMOMETHANE,
UG/
LBROMOMETHANE,
L
6
4
2
0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
CHLOROETHANE,
UG/
LCHLOROETHANE,
L
60
50
40
30
20
10
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
CIS­
1,2­
DCE+
2,2­
DCP,
UG/
LCIS­
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
DIBROMOMETHANE,
UG/
LDIBROMOMETHANE,
L
20
15
10
5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
CARBONTET+
1,1­
DCP,
UG/
LCARBONTET+
L
25
20
15
10
5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
CHLOROFORM,
UG/
LCHLOROFORM,
L
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
CIS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
LCIS­
L
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE,
UG/
LDICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE,
L
8
6
4
2
0
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
CHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
LCHLOROBENZENE,
L
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
­
2.0
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
CHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
LCHLOROMETHANE,
L
5
4
3
2
1
0
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
LDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE,
L
100
80
60
40
20
0
­
3­
2­
10
1
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE,
UG/
LHEXACHLOROBUTADIENE,
L
Tue
May
7
16:
44:
47
2002
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PIDOrganics,
PID
1,3,5­
TMB+
4­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L1,3,5­
L
­
1.5
10
20
30
40
50
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
60
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PIDOrganics,
PID
1,2,4­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L1,2,4­
L
­
1.5
10
20
30
0.0
0.5
1.0
40
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE,
UG/
LTRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE,
L
­
0.5
5
10
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
TRANS­
1,2­
DICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
LTRANS­
L
15
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
4
6
8
10
12
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
14
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PIDOrganics,
PID
1,2­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L1,2­
L
­
1.0
6
16
14
12
10
8
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PIDOrganics,
PID
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L1,2,3­
L
18
­
2­
10
1
0
20
40
60
80
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
100
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
TRICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
LTRICHLOROETHENE,
L
­
1.0
5
10
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
15
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
TETRACHLOROETHENE,
UG/
LTETRACHLOROETHENE,
L
­
1.5
20
40
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
60
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PIDOrganics,
PID
1,2,4­
TRIMETHYLBENZENE,
UG/
L1,2,4­
L
­
1.5
5
10
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
VINYL
CHLORIDE,
UG/
LVINYL
L
15
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
TRANS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
LTRANS­
L
6
0
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1
2
3
4
5
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
6
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCDOrganics,
ELCD
METHYLENE
CHLORIDE,
UG/
LMETHYLENE
L
­
1.0
10
20
30
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

Relative
Standard
Deviation
40
Episode
6000
Data
Page
9
of
32
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Tue
May
7
16:
45:
00
2002
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PIDOrganics,
PID
N­
PROPYLBENZENE,
UG/
LN­
L
­
1.5
10
2
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PIDOrganics,
PID
N­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
LN­
L
20
30
4
40
6
50
8
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PIDOrganics,
PID
ISOPROPYLBENZENE,
UG/
LISOPROPYLBENZENE,
L
10
­
2
­
1
0
1
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
5
0
20
10
10
15
30
40
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PIDOrganics,
PID
HEXCHLOBUTADIENE+
NAPHTHALENE,
UG/
LHEXCHLOBUTADIENE+
L
20
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PIDOrganics,
PID
CIS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
LCIS­
L
50
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
10
0
20
20
40
40
30
60
50
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PIDOrganics,
PID
CHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
LCHLOROBENZENE,
L
80
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
60
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PIDOrganics,
PID
BENZENE,
UG/
LBENZENE,
L
­
1.5
20
10
20
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PIDOrganics,
PID
2­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L2­
L
30
40
60
40
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
50
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PIDOrganics,
PID
M+
P
XYLENE,
UG/
LM+
L
­
1.5
5
10
15
20
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
25
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PIDOrganics,
PID
ETHYLBENZENE,
UG/
LETHYLBENZENE,
L
­
1.5
5
10
15
20
25
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
30
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PIDOrganics,
PID
BROMOBENZENE,
UG/
LBROMOBENZENE,
L
­
1.5
5
10
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
15
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PIDOrganics,
PID
1,3­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L1,3­
L
­
1.5
20
40
60
80
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

Relative
Standard
Deviation
100
Episode
6000
Data
Page
10
of
32
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Tue
May
7
16:
45:
14
2002
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s