Document ID: USCG-2011-0939-0001
Agency: uscg
Document Type: Rule
Title: TFR:  Security Zones: Columbia and Willamette Rivers, Dredge Vessels Patriot and Liberty (Federal Register Publication)
Posted Date: 2011-10-13T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 198 (Thursday, October 13, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63547-63549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26413]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2011-0939]
RIN 1625-AA87

Security Zone; Columbia and Willamette Rivers, Dredge Vessels 
Patriot and Liberty

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone 
within 200 yards of the Dredge Vessels Patriot and Liberty while the 
vessels are underway, anchored, or conducting dredging operations in 
the vicinity of Willamette River Mile 2 and Columbia River Mile 105. 
Entry into this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of 
the Port, Columbia River or his designated representative. The Coast 
Guard is establishing this temporary security zone around the vessels 
to provide security during operations and this will be done so by 
prohibiting all persons or vessels from operating within 200 yards of 
the vessel.

DATES: This rule is effective from October 13, 2011, through October 
31, 2011. The security zone has been enforced with actual notice since 
from 7 a.m. on October 1, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in 
the docket are part of docket USCG-2011-0939 and are available online 
by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0939 in the 
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available 
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), 
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room 
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this 
temporary rule, call or e-mail BM1 Silvestre Suga III, Waterways 
Management Division, Coast Guard MSU Portland; telephone 503-240-9319, 
e-mail Silvestre.g.suga@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the 
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, 
telephone 202-366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

[[Page 63548]]

Regulatory Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior 
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because to do so would be contrary to public 
interest due to insufficient time in which to publish an NPRM since the 
Dredge Vessels Patriot and Liberty would have started their operations 
on the Columbia and Willamette Rivers by the time the notice could be 
published and comments taken.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register. Publishing a NPRM would be 
contrary to public interest since immediate action is necessary to 
safeguard the Dredge Vessels Patriot and Liberty from sabotage, other 
subversive acts, or accidents, and otherwise protect these vessels.

Background and Purpose

    The Dredge Vessels Patriot and Liberty will be conducting 
operations at Columbia River Mile 105 and Willamette River Mile 2. This 
temporary security zone is necessary to help ensure the security of 
these vessels while conducting dredging operations. This will be done 
by prohibiting all persons or vessels from operating near the vessels 
while they are located in the Columbia or Willamette Rivers.

Discussion of Rule

    This rule establishes a temporary security zone around the Dredge 
Vessels Patriot and Liberty while they are anchored, underway, or 
conducting dredging operations. The security zone encompasses all 
waters within 200 yards around the vessels. No person or vessel may 
enter or remain in the security zone unless authorized by the Captain 
of the Port, Columbia River or his designated representative.
    The security zone will be in effect while the Dredge Vessels are 
operating in the Columbia and Willamette Rivers between approximately 7 
a.m. on October 1, 2011 through October 31, 2011.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not 
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not 
reviewed it under that Order. The Coast Guard has made this 
determination based on the fact that the security zone is limited in 
duration and maritime traffic will be able to transit around the zones.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities. This rule may affect the following entities some of which may 
be small entities: The owners and operators of vessels intending to 
operate in the area covered by the security zone created by this rule. 
The security zone will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities because maritime traffic will be 
able to transit around the zone and therefore any interruption to 
navigation is minimal.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small 
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its 
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under 
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for 
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

[[Page 63549]]

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards 
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, 
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why 
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or 
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical 
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or 
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management 
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus 
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded 
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of 
the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of a security 
zone. An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion 
determination are available in the docket where indicated under 
ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L. 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T13-197 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T13-197  Security Zone; Columbia and Willamette Rivers, M/V 
PATRIOT AND M/V LIBERTY.

    (a) Location. The following area is a security zone: All waters 
within 200 yards in all directions of Dredge vessels Patriot and 
Liberty while these vessels are operating at Willamette River Mile 2 
and Columbia River Mile 105.
    (b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33 
CFR part 165, subpart D, no person may enter or remain in the security 
zone created in this section or bring, cause to be brought, or allow to 
remain in the security zone created in this section any vehicle, 
vessel, or object unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his 
designated representative. Designated representatives are Coast Guard 
personnel authorized by the Captain of the Port to grant persons or 
vessels permission to enter or remain in the security zone created by 
this section. See 33 CFR part 165, subpart D, for additional 
information and requirements.
    (c) Enforcement period. The security zone created by this section 
will be in effect from 7 a.m. on October 1, 2011, through October 31, 
2011.

    Dated: September 28, 2011.
B.C. Jones,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2011-26413 Filed 10-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P