Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0253-0183
Agency: epa
Document Type: Supporting & Related Material
Title: 
Posted Date: 2008-10-16T04:00Z

Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US 

09/29/2008 05:25 PM

	

To

"King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

cc

Brian Heninger/DC/USEPA/US@epa, Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@epa,
Charles Fulcher/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Darryl Weatherhead/RTP/USEPA/US@epa,
Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US@epa, Michael_C._Clark@omb.eop.gov,
simon.nathalie@epa.gov, Al McGartland, fann.neal@epa.gov, Tricia
Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman, rosalina rodriguez,
walton.tom@epa.gov, Arthur_G._Fraas@omb.eop.gov,
Amanda_I._Lee@omb.eop.gov, Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov.

Subject

counties not in attainment for Pb NAAQS RIA

Heidi, this morning Kathy offered to share information about what we
know about the sources in the 9 counties which do not attain a 0.15
microgram/m3 standard with identified controls.  The data is shown in
the attached.  In summary:

o	Every county has a metal processing facility, these are largely small
facilities.   Some of which have existing controls (like a baghouse). 
Others do not have control information in the NEI.

o	4 of the counties have known land contamination, 3 of which have
Superfund sites.

We will be happy to discuss these once you have had a chance to review
the enclosed.  Have a good evening.

Ron