Document ID: SEC-2021-0549-0001
Agency: sec
Document Type: Notice
Title: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes: Cboe Exchange, Inc.
Posted Date: 2021-04-21T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20760-20772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-08147]

[[Page 20760]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-91576; File No. SR-CBOE-2021-022]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend 
Its Rules Relating to Categories of Registration and Respective 
Qualification Examinations Required for Trading Permit Holders and 
Associated Persons That Engage in Trading Activities on the Exchange

April 15, 2021.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act'' or ``Exchange Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ 
notice is hereby given that on April 5, 2021, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the 
``Exchange'' or ``Cboe Options'') filed with the Securities and 
Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'' or ``SEC'') the proposed rule 
change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have 
been substantially prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the 
proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) 
thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its rules relating to categories of 
registration and respective qualification examinations required for 
Trading Permit Holders (``TPHs'') and associated persons that engage in 
trading activities on the Exchange. The text of the proposed rule 
change is provided in Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the 
Exchange's website (http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the 
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange has adopted registration requirements to ensure that 
associated persons of TPH organizations attain and maintain specified 
levels of competence and knowledge pertinent to their function. In 
general, the current rules require that persons engaged in a TPH 
organization's securities business who are to function as 
representatives or principals register with the Exchange in the 
category of registration appropriate to their functions by passing one 
or more qualification examinations \5\ and exempt specified associated 
persons from the registration requirements.\6\ They also prescribe 
ongoing continuing education requirements for registered persons.\7\ 
The Exchange now proposes to amend, reorganize and enhance its rules 
regarding registration, qualification examinations and continuing 
education, as described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Cboe Options Rule 3.30(a)(1).
    \6\ See Cboe Options Rule 3.30(a)(2).
    \7\ See Cboe Options Rule 3.33.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In 2017, the Commission approved a Financial Industry Regulatory 
Authority, Inc. (``FINRA'') proposed rule change adopting rules 
relating to qualification and registration requirements in the 
consolidated FINRA Rulebook, restructuring the FINRA representative-
level qualification examinations, creating a general knowledge 
examination and specialized knowledge examinations, allowing permissive 
registration, establishing an exam waiver process for persons working 
for a financial services affiliate of a member, and amending certain 
Continuing Education (``CE'') requirements (the ``FINRA Rule 
Changes'').\8\ The FINRA Rule Changes became effective on October 1, 
2018. Other exchanges, such as Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq''), 
New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'') and Miami International 
Securities Exchange, LLC (``MIAX'') subsequently adopted rule changes 
based on FINRA's Rule Changes (collectively with the FINRA Rule 
Changes, the ``Registration Rule Changes'').\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Exchange Act Release No. 81098 (July 7, 2017), 82 FR 
32419 (July 13, 2017) (Order Approving File No. SR-FINRA-2017-007). 
See also FINRA Regulatory Notice 17-30 (SEC Approves Consolidated 
FINRA Registration Rules, Restructured Representative-Level 
Qualification Examinations and Changes to Continuing Education 
Requirements) (October 2017). FINRA articulated its belief that the 
proposed rule change would streamline, and bring consistency and 
uniformity to, its registration rules, which would, in turn, assist 
FINRA members and their associated persons in complying with the 
rules and improve regulatory efficiency. FINRA also determined to 
enhance the overall efficiency of its representative-level 
examinations program by eliminating redundancy of subject matter 
content across examinations, retiring several outdated 
representative-level registrations, and introducing a general 
knowledge examination that could be taken by all potential 
representative-level registrants and the general public. FINRA 
amended certain aspects of its continuing education rule, including 
by codifying existing guidance regarding the effect of failing to 
complete the Regulatory Element on a registered person's activities 
and compensation.
    \9\ See, e.g., Exchange Act Release No. 84638 (November 20, 
2018), 83 FR 60909 (November 27, 2018) (SR-NASDAQ-2018-093). See 
also Exchange Act Release No. 84336 (October 2, 2018), 83 FR 50727 
(October 9, 2018) (SR-NYSE-2018-44) and Exchange Act Release No. 
87830 (December 20, 2019), 84 FR 72025 (December 30, 2019) (SR-MIAX-
2019-50). The Exchange notes the affiliates of these Exchanges have 
filed similar rule changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange now proposes to amend, reorganize and enhance its own 
membership, registration and qualification rules in part in response to 
the Registration Rule Changes, and also in order to conform the 
Exchange's rules more closely to those of its affiliated exchanges and 
non-affiliated exchanges in the interest of uniformity and to 
facilitate compliance with membership, registration and qualification 
regulatory requirements by members of multiple exchanges. The proposed 
rule change also includes the proposal to enhance its registration 
rules by adding a new registration requirement applicable to developers 
of algorithmic trading systems similar to a requirement adopted by 
FINRA pursuant to a 2016 FINRA proposed rule change.\10\ In

[[Page 20761]]

connection with these changes, the Exchange proposes to amend Cboe 
Options Rules 3.30, 3.33, 3.36 and 3.37 and adopt Cboe Options Rules 
3.31, 3.32 and 3.34.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Exchange Act Release No. 77551 (April 7, 2016), 81 FR 
21914 (April 13, 2016) (Order Approving File No. SR-FINRA-2016-007). 
In its proposed rule change FINRA addressed the increasing 
significance of algorithmic trading strategies by amending its rules 
to require registration, as Securities Traders, of associated 
persons primarily responsible for the design, development or 
significant modification of algorithmic trading strategies, or who 
are responsible for the day-to-day supervision or direction of such 
activities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Registration Requirements (Proposed Rule 3.30)
    Cboe Options Rule 3.30 currently requires that persons engaged, or 
to be engaged, in the securities business of a TPH who are to function 
as representatives or principals register with the Exchange in the 
category of registration appropriate to their functions as specified in 
Cboe Options Rule 3.30.\11\ The Exchange proposes to amend Rules 3.30 
and 3.33 and adopt Rules 3.31 and 3.32 to address various elements of 
registration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Cboe Options Rule 3.30.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 3.30 provides that each person engaged in the 
securities business of a TPH must register with the Exchange as a 
representative or principal in each category of registration 
appropriate to his or her functions and responsibilities as specified 
in proposed Rule 3.31, unless exempt from registration pursuant to 
proposed Rule 3.32. Proposed Rule 3.30 also provides that such person 
is not qualified to function in any registered capacity other than that 
for which the person is registered, unless otherwise stated in the 
rules.
Minimum Number of Registered Principals (Proposed Rule 3.30.01)
    Rule 3.30.07 currently requires that every TPH must register with 
the Exchange in a heightened capacity each individual acting in any of 
the following roles: (i) officer; (ii) partner; (iii) director; (iv) 
supervisor of proprietary trading, market-making or brokerage 
activities; and/or (v) supervisor of those engaged in proprietary 
trading, market-making or brokerage activities with respect to those 
activities. Each TPH must register with the Exchange at least two 
individuals acting in one or more of the capacities described in (i)-
(v) above. The Exchange is able to waive this requirement if a TPH 
demonstrates conclusively that only one individual acting in one or 
more of the capacities described in (i) through (v) above should be 
required to register. In addition, a TPH that conducts proprietary 
trading only and has 25 or fewer registered persons shall instead be 
required to have a minimum of one officer or partner who is registered 
in this capacity. The Exchange is proposing to eliminate Rule 3.30.07 
and, in its place, adopt a similar, but new, Rule 3.30.01. The new rule 
would provide TPHs that limit the scope of their business flexibility 
in satisfying the two-principal requirement. In particular, proposed 
Rule 3.30.01 requires that a TPH have a minimum of two General 
Securities Principals, provided that a TPH that is limited in the scope 
of its activities may instead have two officers or partners who are 
registered in a principal category that corresponds to the scope of the 
TPH's activities. For instance, if a TPH's business is limited to 
securities trading, the TPH may have two Securities Trader Principals, 
instead of two General Securities Principals. Additionally, proposed 
Rule 3.30.01 provides that any TPH with only one associated person is 
excluded from the two-principal requirement. Proposed Rule 3.30.01 
would provide that existing TPHs as well as new applicants may request 
a waiver of the two-principal requirement, consistent with current Rule 
3.30.07. Finally, the Exchange is proposing to retain the existing 
rule's provision permitting a proprietary trading firm with 25 or fewer 
registered representatives to have just one registered principal. The 
Exchange notes that proposed Rule 3.30.01 is substantively the same as 
FINRA's and other exchanges' corresponding Rules.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.01 (Minimum Number of Registered 
Principals and Nasdaq Rule 1210.01 (Minimum Number of Registered 
Principals)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Permissive Registrations (Proposed Rule 3.30.02)
    Current Rule 3.30(a)(1) prohibits TPHs from maintaining a 
registration with the Exchange for any person (A) who is no longer 
active in the TPH's securities business, (B) who is no longer 
functioning in the registered capacity, or (C) where the sole purpose 
is to avoid the examination requirement of the rule. A TPH may not make 
application for the registration of any person where there is no intent 
to employ such person in the TPH's securities business. However, a TPH 
may maintain or make application for the registration of a person who 
performs legal, compliance, internal audit, back-office operations, or 
similar duties for the TPH or a person engaged in the securities 
business of a foreign securities affiliate or subsidiary of the TPH. 
The Exchange is proposing to replace this provision with new Rule 
3.30.02. The Exchange is also proposing to expand the scope of 
permissive registrations and to clarify a TPH's obligations regarding 
individuals who are maintaining such registrations.
    Specifically, proposed Rule 3.30.02 allows any associated person to 
obtain and maintain any registration permitted by the TPH. For 
instance, an associated person of a TPH working solely in a clerical or 
ministerial capacity, such as in an administrative capacity, would be 
able to obtain and maintain a General Securities Representative 
registration with the TPH. As another example, an associated person of 
a TPH who is registered, and functioning solely, as a General 
Securities Representative would be able to obtain and maintain a 
General Securities Principal registration with the TPH. Further, 
proposed Rule 3.30.02 allows an individual engaged in the securities 
business of a foreign securities affiliate or subsidiary of a TPH to 
obtain and maintain any registration permitted by the TPH.
    The Exchange is proposing to permit the registration of such 
individuals for several reasons. First, a TPH may foresee a need to 
move a former representative or principal who has not been registered 
for two or more years back into a position that would require such 
person to be registered. Currently, such persons are required to 
requalify (or obtain a waiver of the applicable qualification 
examinations) and reapply for registration. Second, the proposed rule 
change would allow TPHs to develop a depth of associated persons with 
registrations in the event of unanticipated personnel changes. Third, 
allowing registration in additional categories encourages greater 
regulatory understanding.
    Individuals maintaining a permissive registration under the 
proposed rule change would be considered registered persons and subject 
to all Exchange rules, to the extent relevant to their activities. For 
instance, an individual working solely in an administrative capacity 
would be able to maintain a General Securities Representative 
registration and would be considered a registered person for purposes 
of rules relating to borrowing from or lending to customers, but the 
rule would have no practical application to his or her conduct because 
he or she would not have any customers.
    Consistent with the Exchange's supervision rules, TPHs would be 
required to have adequate supervisory systems and procedures reasonably 
designed to ensure that individuals with permissive registrations do 
not act outside the scope of their assigned functions. With respect to 
an individual who solely maintains a permissive registration, such as 
an individual working exclusively in an administrative capacity, the 
individual's day-to-day supervisor may be a

[[Page 20762]]

nonregistered person. TPHs would be required to assign a registered 
supervisor to this person who would be responsible for periodically 
contacting such individual's day-to-day supervisor to verify that the 
individual is not acting outside the scope of his or her assigned 
functions. If such individual is permissively registered as a 
representative, the registered supervisor must be registered as a 
representative or principal. If the individual is permissively 
registered as a principal, the registered supervisor must be registered 
as a principal. The Exchange notes that proposed Rule 3.30.02 is 
substantively similar to FINRA and other exchanges' corresponding 
rules.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.02, NYSE Arca Rule 2.1210.01 and 
Nasdaq Rule 1210.02.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Qualification Examinations and Waivers of Examinations (Proposed Rule 
3.30.03)
    Current Rule 3.30(a)(1) provides that before a registration can 
become effective, TPHs must submit the appropriate application for 
registration, pass a qualification examination appropriate to the 
category of registration and submit any required registration and 
examination fees. The Exchange is proposing to incorporate similar 
language in new Rule 3.30.03.
    In addition, as part of the FINRA Rule Changes, FINRA adopted a 
restructured representative-level qualification examination program 
whereby representative-level registrants would be required to take a 
general knowledge examination (the Securities Industry Essentials Exam 
or ``SIE'') and a specialized knowledge examination appropriate to 
their job functions at the firm with which they are associating. The 
Exchange similarly adopted this requirement, which is reflected in 
current Cboe Options Rules 3.30.08 and 3.37(d).\14\ The Exchange 
therefore also proposes to provide in proposed Rule 3.30.03 that before 
the registration of a person as a representative can become effective 
under proposed Rule 3.30, such person must pass the SIE and an 
appropriate representative-level qualification examination as specified 
in proposed Rule 3.31. Proposed Rule 3.30.03 also provides that before 
the registration of a person as a principal can become effective under 
proposed Rule 3.30, such person must pass an appropriate principal-
level qualification examination as specified in proposed Rule 3.31.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Exchange Act Release No. 84142 (September 14, 2018), 83 
FR 47665 (September 20, 2018) (SR-CBOE-2018-064).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, proposed Rule 3.30.03 provides that if a registered 
person's job functions change and he or she needs to become registered 
in another representative-level category, he or she would not need to 
pass the SIE again. Rather, the registered person would need to pass 
only the appropriate representative-level qualification examination. 
Moreover, proposed Rule 3.30.03 provides that all associated persons, 
such as associated persons whose functions are solely and exclusively 
clerical or ministerial, are eligible to take the SIE. Proposed Rule 
3.30.03 also provides that individuals who are not associated persons 
of firms, such as members of the general public, are eligible to take 
the SIE. The Exchange believes that expanding the pool of individuals 
who are eligible to take the SIE would enable prospective securities 
industry professionals to demonstrate to prospective employers a basic 
level of knowledge prior to submitting a job application. Further, this 
approach would allow for more flexibility and career mobility within 
the securities industry. While all associated persons of firms as well 
as individuals who are not associated persons would be eligible to take 
the SIE pursuant to the proposed rule, passing the SIE alone would not 
qualify them for registration with the Exchange. Rather, to be eligible 
for registration with the Exchange, an individual must pass an 
applicable representative or principal qualification examination and 
complete the other requirements of the registration process.
    Proposed Rule 3.30.03 also provides that the Exchange may, in 
exceptional cases and where good cause is shown, waive the applicable 
qualification examination(s) and accept other standards as evidence of 
an applicant's qualifications for registration. The rule will also 
state that advanced age or physical infirmity will not individually of 
themselves constitute sufficient grounds to waive a qualification 
examination and that experience in fields ancillary to the securities 
business may constitute sufficient grounds to waive a qualification 
examination. The Exchange notes that proposed language relating to 
waivers is already contained in current Rule 3.30.05.\15\ Proposed Rule 
3.30.03 will further provide that the Exchange shall only consider 
waiver requests submitted by a TPH for individuals associated with the 
TPH who are seeking registration in a representative or principal 
registration category. Moreover, the Exchange shall consider waivers of 
the SIE alone or the SIE and the applicable representative and 
principal examination(s) for such individuals. The Exchange shall not 
consider a waiver of the SIE for individuals who are not associated 
persons or for associated persons who are not registering as 
representatives or principals. The Exchange notes that proposed Rule 
3.30.03 is substantively similar to FINRA and other exchanges' 
rules.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Pursuant to a Regulatory Services Agreement between FINRA 
and the Exchange, FINRA provides the Exchange certain exam waiver 
services in responding to exam waiver requests from TPHs.
    \16\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.03, NYSE Arca Rule 2.1210.02 and 
Nasdaq Rule 1210.03.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Requirements for Registered Persons Functioning as Principals for a 
Limited Period (Proposed Rule 3.30.04)
    The Exchange next proposes to adopt Rule 3.30.04, which governs the 
requirements for registered persons who wish to function as a principal 
for a limited period. Particularly, proposed Rule 3.30.04 provides that 
a TPH may designate any person currently registered, or who becomes 
registered, with the TPH as a representative to function as a principal 
for a limited period, provided that such person has at least 18 months 
of experience functioning as a registered representative with the five-
year period immediately preceding the designation. The proposed rule is 
intended to ensure that representatives designated to function as 
principals for the limited period under the proposal have an 
appropriate level of registered representative experience. The proposed 
rule clarifies that the requirements of the rule apply to designations 
to any principal category, including those categories that are not 
subject to a prerequisite representative-level registration 
requirement, such as the Financial and Operations Principal 
registration category.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ The Exchange notes that qualifying as a registered 
representative is a prerequisite to qualifying as a principal except 
with respect to the following principal-level registrations: (1) 
Compliance Officer and (2) Financial and Operations Principal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule also clarifies that the individual must fulfill 
all applicable prerequisite registration, fee and examination 
requirements before his or her designation as a principal. Further, the 
proposed rule provides that in no event may such person function as a 
principal beyond the initial 120 calendar days without having 
successfully passed an appropriate principal qualification examination. 
The proposed rule also provides an exception to the experience 
requirement for principals who are designated by a TPH to function in 
other principal categories for a limited period. Specifically, the 
proposed rule states

[[Page 20763]]

that a TPH may designate any person currently registered, or who 
becomes registered, with the TPH as a principal to function in another 
principal category for 120 calendar days before passing any applicable 
examinations. The Exchange notes that proposed Rule 3.30.04 is 
substantively similar to similar FINRA and other exchanges' rules.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.04, NYSE Arca Rule 2.1210.03 and 
Nasdaq Rule 1210.04.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rules of Conduct for Taking Examinations and Confidentiality of 
Examinations (Proposed Rule 3.30.05)
    Proposed Rule 3.30.05 provides that associated persons taking the 
SIE would be subject to the SIE Rules of Conduct, and associated 
persons taking a representative or principal examination would be 
subject to the Rules of Conduct for representative and principal 
examinations. Pursuant to proposed Rule 3.30.05, a violation of the SIE 
Rules of Conduct or the Rules of Conduct for representative and 
principal examinations by an associated person would be deemed to be a 
violation of Exchange rules requiring just and equitable principles of 
trade.\19\ Moreover, if an associated person is deemed to have violated 
the SIE Rules of Conduct or the Rules of Conduct for representative and 
principal examinations, the associated person may forfeit the results 
of the examination and may be subject to disciplinary action by the 
Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See, e.g., Cboe Options Rule 8.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, the proposed rule states that individuals taking the SIE 
who are not associated persons must agree to be subject to the SIE 
Rules of Conduct. Among other things, the SIE Rules of Conduct would 
require individuals to attest that they are not qualified to engage in 
the investment banking or securities business based on passing the SIE 
and would prohibit individuals from cheating on the examination or 
misrepresenting their qualifications to the public subsequent to 
passing the SIE. Moreover, non-associated persons may forfeit their SIE 
results and may be prohibited from retaking the SIE if the Exchange 
determines that they cheated on the SIE or that they misrepresented 
their qualifications to the public subsequent to passing the SIE.
    The proposed rule further notes that the Exchange considers all 
qualification examinations content to be highly confidential and that 
the removal of examination content from an examination center, 
reproduction, disclosure, receipt from or passing to any person, or use 
for study purposes of any portion of such qualification examination or 
any other use that would compromise the effectiveness of the 
examinations and the use in any manner and at any time of the questions 
or answers to the examinations is prohibited and would be deemed a 
violation of Exchange rules requiring just and equitable principles of 
trade.\20\ The Exchange notes that proposed Rule 3.30.05 is 
substantively similar to similar FINRA and other exchanges' rules.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See, e.g., Cboe Options Rule 8.1.
    \21\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.05, NYSE Arca Rule 2.1210.04 and 
Nasdaq Rule 1210.05.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Waiting Periods for Retaking a Failed Examination (Proposed Rule 
3.30.06)
    Proposed Rule 3.30.06 provides that any person who fails a 
qualification examination may retake that examination after 30 calendar 
days from the date of the person's last attempt to pass that 
examination. The proposed rule further provides that if a person fails 
an examination three or more times in succession within a two-year 
period, he or she would be prohibited from retaking the examination 
until a period of 180 calendar days from the date of the person's last 
attempt to pass it. These waiting periods would apply to the SIE and 
the representative- and principal-level examinations. The Exchange 
notes that proposed Rule 3.30.06 is substantively similar to FINRA and 
other exchanges' rules.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.06, NYSE Arca Rule 2.1210.05 and 
Nasdaq Rule 1210.06. FINRA Rule 1210.06 requires individuals taking 
the SIE who are not associated persons to agree to be subject to the 
same waiting periods for retaking the SIE. The Exchange is not 
including this language in proposed Rule 3.30.06, as the Exchange 
will not apply its registration rules in any event to individuals 
who are not associated persons of TPHs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

All Registered Persons Must Satisfy the Regulatory Element of 
Continuing Education (Proposed Rule 3.30.07)
    Pursuant to current Rule 3.33, the CE requirements applicable to 
registered persons consist of a Regulatory Element and a Firm Element. 
The Regulatory Element applies to registered persons and must be 
completed within prescribed time frames. The Firm Element consists of 
annual, TPH-developed and administered training programs designed to 
keep covered registered persons current regarding securities products, 
services and strategies offered by the TPH. For purposes of the Firm 
Element, the term ``covered registered persons'' means any registered 
Securities Trader and any registered person who has direct contact with 
customers in the conduct of the TPH's securities sales, trading and 
investment banking activities and to the immediate supervisors of such 
persons.
    The CE requirements are set forth in current Rule 3.33. The 
Exchange believes that all registered persons, regardless of their 
activities, should be subject to the Regulatory Element of the CE 
requirements so that they can keep their knowledge of the securities 
industry current. Therefore, the Exchange proposes to adopt Rule 
3.30.07, to clarify that all registered persons, including those who 
solely maintain a permissive registration, are required to satisfy the 
Regulatory Element, as specified in current Rule 3.33. Individuals who 
have passed the SIE but not a representative- or principal-level 
examination and do not hold a registered position would not be subject 
to any CE requirements.
    Proposed Rule 3.30.07 also provides that a registered person of a 
TPH who becomes CE inactive would not be permitted to be registered in 
another registration category with the TPH or be registered in any 
registration category with another TPH, until the person has satisfied 
the Regulatory Element. The Exchange notes that proposed Rule 3.30.07 
is substantively similar to FINRA and other exchanges' rules.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.07, NYSE Arca Rule 2.1210.06 and 
Nasdaq Rule 1210.07.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lapse of Registration and Expiration of SIE (Proposed Rule 3.30.08)
    Proposed Rule 3.30.08 provides that any person who was last 
registered as a representative two or more years immediately preceding 
the date of receipt by the Exchange of a new application for 
registration as a representative is required to pass a qualification 
examination for representatives appropriate to the category of 
registration as specified in proposed Rule 3.31(b). Proposed Rule 
3.30.08 also sets forth that a passing result on the SIE would be valid 
for up to four years. Therefore, under the proposed rule change, an 
individual who passes the SIE and is an associated person of a TPH at 
the time would have up to four years from the date he or she passes the 
SIE to pass a representative-level examination to register as a 
representative with that TPH, or a subsequent TPH, without having to 
retake the SIE. In addition, an individual who passes the SIE and is 
not an associated person at the time would have up to four years from 
the date he or she passes the SIE to become an associated person of TPH 
and pass a representative-level examination and register as a 
representative without having to retake the SIE.

[[Page 20764]]

    Moreover, an individual holding a representative-level registration 
who leaves the industry after the effective date of this proposed rule 
change would have up to four years to re-associate with a TPH and 
register as a representative without having to retake the SIE. However, 
the four-year expiration period in the proposed rule change extends 
only to the SIE, and not the representative- and principal-level 
registrations. The representative- and principal-level registrations 
would continue to be subject to a two-year expiration period as is the 
case today.
    Finally, proposed Rule 3.30.08 clarifies that, for purposes of the 
proposed rule, an application would not be considered to have been 
received by the Exchange if that application does not result in a 
registration. The Exchange notes that proposed Rule 3.30.08 is 
substantively similar to similar FINRA and other exchanges' rules.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.08, NYSE Arca Rule 2.1210.07 and 
Nasdaq Rule 1210.08.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Waiver of Examinations for Individuals Working for a Financial Services 
Industry Affiliate of a TPH (Proposed Rule 3.30.09)
    The Exchange is proposing Rule 3.30.09 to provide a new process 
whereby individuals who would be working for a ``financial services 
industry affiliate of a TPH'' \25\ would terminate their registrations 
with the TPH and would be granted a waiver of their requalification 
requirements upon re-registering with an TPH, provided the firm that is 
requesting the waiver and the individual satisfy the criteria for a 
Financial Services Affiliate (``FSA'') waiver.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ Proposed Rule 3.30.09 defines a ``financial services 
industry affiliate of a TPH'' as a legal entity that controls, is 
controlled by or is under common control with TPH and is regulated 
by the SEC, CFTC, state securities authorities, federal or state 
banking authorities, state insurance authorities, or substantially 
equivalent foreign regulatory authorities.
    \26\ There is no counterpart to proposed Rule 3.30.09 in the 
Exchange's existing rules. FINRA Rule 1210.09 was previously adopted 
as a new waiver process for FINRA registrants, as part of the FINRA 
Rule Changes. Other Exchanges have since adopted substantively 
similar Rules. See, e.g., NYSE Arca Rule 2.1210.08 and Nasdaq Rule 
1210.09.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under the proposed waiver process, the first time a registered 
person is designated as eligible for a waiver based on the FSA 
criteria, the TPH with which the individual is registered would notify 
the Exchange of the FSA designation. The TPH would concurrently file a 
full Form U5 terminating the individual's registration with the firm, 
which would also terminate the individual's other self-regulatory 
organization and state registrations. To be eligible for initial 
designation as an FSA-eligible person by a TPH, an individual must have 
been registered for a total of five years within the most recent 10-
year period prior to the designation, including for the most recent 
year with that TPH. An individual would have to satisfy these 
preconditions only for purposes of his or her initial designation as an 
FSA-eligible person, and not for any subsequent FSA designation(s). 
Thereafter, the individual would be eligible for a waiver for up to 
seven years from the date of initial designation,\27\ provided that the 
other conditions of the waiver, as described below, have been 
satisfied. Consequently, a TPH other than the TPH that initially 
designated an individual as an FSA-eligible person may request a waiver 
for the individual and more than one TPH may request a waiver for the 
individual during the seven-year period.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ Individuals would be eligible for a single, fixed seven-
year period from the date of initial designation, and the period 
would not be tolled or renewed.
    \28\ The following examples illustrate this point:
     Example 1. TPH A designates an individual as an FSA-eligible 
person by notifying the Exchange and files a Form U5. The individual 
joins Firm A's financial services affiliate. TPH A does not submit a 
waiver request for the individual. After working for TPH A's 
financial services affiliate for three years, the individual 
directly joins TPH B's financial services affiliate for three years. 
TPH B then submits a waiver request to register the individual.
     Example 2. Same as Example 1, but the individual directly joins 
TPH B after working for TPH A's financial services affiliate, and 
TPH B submits a waiver request to register the individual at that 
point in time.
     Example 3. TPH A designates an individual as an FSA-eligible 
person by notifying the Exchange and files a Form U5. The individual 
joins TPH A's financial services affiliate for three years. TPH A 
then submits a waiver request to re-register the individual. After 
working for TPH A in a registered capacity for six months, TPH A re-
designates the individual as an FSA-eligible person by notifying the 
Exchange and files a Form U5. The individual rejoins TPH A's 
financial services affiliate for two years, after which the 
individual directly joins TPH B's financial services affiliate for 
one year. TPH B then submits a waiver request to register the 
individual.
     Example 4. Same as Example 3, but the individual directly joins 
TPH B after the second period of working for TPH A's financial 
services affiliate, and TPH B submits a waiver request to register 
the individual at that point in time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    An individual designated as an FSA-eligible person would be subject 
to the Regulatory Element of CE while working for a financial services 
industry affiliate of a TPH. The individual would be subject to a 
Regulatory Element program that correlates to his or her most recent 
registration category, and CE would be based on the same cycle had the 
individual remained registered. If the individual fails to complete the 
prescribed Regulatory Element during the 120-day window for taking the 
session, he or she would lose FSA eligibility (i.e., the individual 
would have the standard two-year period after termination to re-
register without having to retake an examination). The Exchange is 
making corresponding changes to Rule 3.33, Continuing Education.
    Upon registering an FSA-eligible person, a TPH would file a Form U4 
and request the appropriate registration(s) for the individual. The TPH 
would also submit an examination waiver request to the Exchange,\29\ 
similar to the process used today for waiver requests, and it would 
represent that the individual is eligible for an FSA waiver based on 
the conditions set forth below. The Exchange would review the waiver 
request and make a determination of whether to grant the request within 
30 calendar days of receiving the request. The Exchange would summarily 
grant the request if the following conditions are met:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ The Exchange would consider a waiver of the representative-
level qualification examination(s), the principal-level 
qualification examination(s) and the SIE, as applicable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (a) Prior to the individual's initial designation as an FSA-
eligible person, the individual was registered for a total of five 
years within the most recent 10-year period, including for the most 
recent year with the TPH that initially designated the individual as an 
FSA-eligible person;
    (b) The waiver request is made within seven years of the 
individual's initial designation as an FSA-eligible person by a TPH;
    (c) The initial designation and any subsequent designation(s) were 
made concurrently with the filing of the individual's related Form U5;
    (d) The individual continuously worked for the financial services 
affiliate(s) of a TPH since the last Form U5 filing;
    (e) The individual has complied with the Regulatory Element of CE; 
and
    (f) The individual does not have any pending or adverse regulatory 
matters, or terminations, that are reportable on the Form U4, and has 
not otherwise been subject to a statutory disqualification while the 
individual was designated as an FSA-eligible person with a TPH.
    Following the Form U5 filing, an individual could move between the 
financial services affiliates of a TPH so long as the individual is 
continuously working for an affiliate. Further, a TPH could submit 
multiple waiver requests for the individual, provided that the

[[Page 20765]]

waiver requests are made during the course of the seven-year 
period.\30\ An individual who has been designated as an FSA-eligible 
person by a TPH would not be able to take additional examinations to 
gain additional registrations while working for a financial services 
affiliate of a TPH.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ For example, if a TPH submits a waiver request for an FSA-
eligible person who has been working for a financial services 
affiliate of the TPH for three years and re-registers the 
individual, the TPH could subsequently file a Form U5 and re-
designate the individual as an FSA-eligible person. Moreover, if the 
individual works with a financial services affiliate of the TPH for 
another three years, the TPH could submit a second waiver request 
and re-register the individual upon returning to the TPH.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Status of Persons Serving in the Armed Forces of the United States 
(Proposed Rule 3.30.10)
    Proposed Rule 3.30.10 provides specific relief to registered 
persons serving in the Armed Forces of the United States. Among other 
things, the proposed rule permits a registered person of a TPH who 
volunteers for or is called into active duty in the Armed Forces of the 
United States to be registered in an inactive status and remain 
eligible to receive ongoing transaction-related compensation. The 
proposed rule also includes specific provisions regarding the deferment 
of the lapse of registration requirements for formerly registered 
persons serving in the Armed Forces of the United States. The proposed 
rule further requires that the TPH with which such person is registered 
promptly notify the Exchange of such person's return to employment with 
the TPH. The proposed rule would require a TPH that is a sole 
proprietor to also similarly notify the Exchange of his or her return 
to participation in the investment banking or securities business. The 
proposed rule also provides that the Exchange would defer the lapse of 
the SIE for formerly registered persons serving in the Armed Forces of 
the United States.
Impermissible Registrations (Proposed Rule 3.30.11)
    Existing Rule 3.30 prohibits a TPH from maintaining a registration 
with the Exchange for any person who is no longer active in the TPH's 
investment banking or securities business, who is no longer functioning 
in the registered capacity, or where the sole purpose is to avoid an 
examination requirement. The Rule also prohibits a TPH from applying 
for the registration of a person where the TPH does not intend to 
employ the person in its investment banking or securities business. 
These prohibitions do not apply to the current permissive registration 
categories identified in Rule 3.30.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ Current Rule 3.30 allows for permissive principal 
registration of individuals who perform legal, compliance, internal 
audit, back-office operations, or similar duties for the TPH or a 
person engaged in the investment banking or securities business of a 
foreign securities affiliate or subsidiary of the TPH.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In light of proposed 3.30.02, Permissive Registrations, discussed 
above the Exchange is proposing to not carry over this language to new 
rule 3.30 and instead adopt Rule 3.30.11, which prohibits a TPH from 
registering or maintaining the registration of a person unless the 
registration is consistent with the requirements of proposed Rule 3.30. 
The Exchange notes that proposed Rule 3.30.11 is substantively similar 
FINRA and other exchanges' rules.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.11 and Nasdaq Rule 1210.11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Registration Categories (Proposed Rule 3.31)
    The Exchange is proposing to adopt new and revised registration 
category rules and related definitions in proposed Rule 3.31, 
Registration Categories.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ For ease of reference, the Exchange proposes to adopt as 
Rule 3.31, Interpretation and Policy .05, a Summary of Qualification 
Requirements in chart form for each of the Exchange's permitted 
registration categories discussed below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Definition of Principal (Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(1))
    As set forth in proposed Rule 3.31(a)(1), for purposes of these 
registration rules, the term ``principal'' means any person associated 
with a TPH, including, but not limited to, sole proprietor, officer, 
partner, director or other person occupying a similar status or 
performing similar functions, actively engaged in the management of the 
TPH's securities business, including supervision, solicitation, conduct 
of the TPH's business, or the training of persons associated with a TPH 
for any of these functions. Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(1) also clarifies 
that a TPH's chief executive officer (``CEO'') and chief financial 
officer (``CFO'') (or equivalent officers) are considered principals 
based solely on their status. The proposed rule further clarifies that 
the term ``principal'' includes any other associated person who is 
performing functions or carrying out responsibilities that are required 
to be performed or carried out by a principal under Exchange Rules.
    In addition, the proposed Rule provides that the phrase ``actively 
engaged in the management of the TPH's securities business'' includes 
the management of, and the implementation of corporate policies related 
to, such business as well as managerial decision-making authority with 
respect to the TPH's securities business and management-level 
responsibilities for supervising any aspect of such business, such as 
serving as a voting member of the TPH's executive, management or 
operations committees. The Exchange notes that proposed definition in 
Rule 3.31(a)(1) is substantively similar to the definition of principal 
in FINRA and other exchanges' rules.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220.(a)(1), NYSE Arca Rule 
2.1220(a)(1) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(1).The Exchange notes that its 
definition of Principal does not include ``manager of office of 
supervisory jurisdiction'' as FINRA, NYSE, and Nasdaq rules do 
because it is not applicable on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

General Securities Principal (Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(2))
    Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(2)(A) states that each principal as defined 
in paragraph (a)(1) (of Rule 3.31) is required to register with the 
Exchange as a General Securities Principal, subject to the following 
exceptions.\35\ The proposed rule provides that if a principal's 
activities include the functions of a Compliance Officer, a Financial 
and Operations Principal, a Securities Trader Principal, a Securities 
Trader Compliance Officer, or a Registered Options Principal, then the 
principal must appropriately register in one or more of these 
categories.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ Under the current Rules, the Exchange does not recognize 
the General Securities Principal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(2)(A) further provides that if a principal's 
activities are limited solely to the functions of a General Securities 
Sales Supervisor, then the principal may appropriately register in that 
category in lieu of registering as a General Securities Principal, 
provided that if the principal is engaged in options sales activities 
he or she would be required to register as a General Securities Sales 
Supervisor or as a Registered Options Principal.
    Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(2)(B) requires that an individual registering 
as a General Securities Principal satisfy the General Securities 
Representative prerequisite registration and pass the General 
Securities Principal qualification examination. Proposed Rule 
3.31(a)(2)(B) also clarifies that an individual may register as a 
General Securities Sales Supervisor and pass the General Securities 
Sales Supervisor Module qualification examination in lieu of passing 
the General Securities Principal examination.
    The Exchange notes that proposed General Securities Principal 
requirements and qualifications set forth in Rule 3.31(a)(2) are 
similar to the

[[Page 20766]]

requirements and qualifications required by FINRA and other exchanges' 
rules.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(a)(2), NYSE Arca Rule 
2.1220(a)(2) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Compliance Officer (Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(3))
    Current Rule 3.30(c) provides that each TPH that registered as a 
broker-dealer shall designated a CCO on Schedule A of Form BD and that 
such individuals are required to register with the Exchange and pass 
the appropriate heightened qualification examination(s). Current Rule 
3.30.08 further provides that any individual that is a CCO (or performs 
similar functions) for a TPH that engages in in proprietary trading, 
market-making or effecting transactions on behalf of a broker-dealer is 
required to register and qualify as a Securities Trader Compliance 
Officer (CT) and pass the Series 14 examination or pass the General 
Securities Principal or Securities Trader Principal qualification 
examination.
    Under the new registration rules, the Exchange proposes to adopt 
Rule 3.31(a)(3) providing that each person designated as a Chief 
Compliance Officer on Schedule A of Form BD shall be required to 
register with the Exchange as a General Securities Principal, provided 
that such person may instead register as a Compliance Officer if his or 
her duties do not include supervision of trading. All individuals 
registering as Compliance Officers would be required, prior to or 
concurrent with such registration, to pass the Compliance Official 
qualification examination. An individual designated as a Chief 
Compliance Officer on Schedule A of Form BD of a TPH that is engaged in 
limited securities business could also be registered in a principal 
category under Rule 3.31(a) that corresponds to the limited scope of 
the TPH's business.
    The Exchange notes that the proposed Compliance Officer 
requirements and qualifications set forth in Rule 3.31(a)(3) are 
similar to the requirements and qualifications required by FINRA's and 
other exchange's rules.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(a)(3) and NYSE Arca Rule 
2.1220(a)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Securities Trader Compliance Officer (Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(4))
    Rule 3.31(a)(4) would provide that an individual designated as a 
Chief Compliance Officer on Schedule A of Form BD may register and 
qualify as a Securities Trader Compliance Officer if, with respect to 
transactions in equity, preferred or convertible debt securities, or 
options, such person is engaged in proprietary trading or Market 
Making, the execution of transactions on an agency basis, or the direct 
supervision of such activities other than a person associated with a 
TPH whose trading activities are conducted principally on behalf of an 
investment company that is registered with the SEC pursuant to the 
Investment Company Act and that controls, is controlled by, or is under 
common control with a TPH. Each individual registering as a Securities 
Trader Compliance Officer would be required to first become registered 
pursuant to paragraph (b)(4) as a Securities Trader, and to pass either 
(i) the Compliance Official qualification exam or (ii) the General 
Securities Principal qualification exam. The Exchange notes that the 
proposed Securities Trader Compliance Officer requirements and 
qualifications set forth in Rule 3.31(a)(4) are similar to the 
requirements and qualifications required by other exchanges' rules.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ See, e.g., Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(3)(D) and MIAX Options Rule 
1220(b)(2)(iv). FINRA does not recognize the Securities Trader 
Compliance Officer registration categories that the Exchange 
proposes to recognize. However, FINRA Rule 1220(a)(3), like proposed 
Rule 3.31(a)(3), offers an exception pursuant to which a Chief 
Compliance Officer designated on Schedule A of Form BD may register 
in a principal category that corresponds to the limited scope of the 
member's business. Unlike Nasdaq and MIAX, the Exchange proposes to 
accept the General Securities Principal exam in lieu of the 
Compliance Official exam. The Exchange notes this is in line with 
the qualification requirements for the Compliance Officer, as well 
as the Exchange's current Securities Trader Compliance Officer 
qualification requirements. See Rule 3.30.08(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Financial and Operations Principal (Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(5))
    Existing Rule 3.30(b) provides that every TPH that is subject to 
Exchange Act Rule 15c3-1 shall designate a Financial/Operations 
Principal. It requires each person associated with a TPH who performs 
such duties to be registered as a Financial/Operations Principal with 
the Exchange and to pass the Series 27 examination.\39\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \39\ FINRA Rule 1220(a)(4) differs from proposed Rule 3.31(a)(5) 
in that it includes an Introducing Broker-Dealer, Financial and 
Operations Principal, and Market-Maker registration requirement. 
Additionally, proposed Rule 3.31(a)(5) contains a requirement, which 
the FINRA rule does not, that each person associated with a member 
who performs the duties of a Financial and Operations Principal must 
register as such with the Exchange. Additionally, the Exchange is 
not adopting a Principal Financial Officer or Principal Operations 
Officer requirement like FINRA Rule 1220(a)(4)(B), as it believes 
the Financial and Operations Principal requirement is sufficient. 
Finally, proposed Rule 3.31(a)(5)(B)(v) and (vi) contain minor 
wording variations from the FINRA rule. Proposed Rule 3.31(a) is 
substantively similar as Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It further provides that each Financial/Operations Principal 
designated by a TPH shall be registered in that capacity with the 
Exchange as prescribed by the Exchange, and that a Financial/Operations 
Principal of a TPH may be a full-time employee, a part-time employee or 
independent contractor of the TPH. The Exchange proposes to delete 
Exchange 3.30(b) and adopt in its place Exchange Rule 3.31(a)(5). Under 
the new rule, every TPH of the Exchange that is operating pursuant to 
the provisions of Rules 15c3-1(a)(1)(ii), (a)(2)(i) or (a)(8) of the 
Exchange Act, shall designate at least one Financial and Operations 
Principal who shall be responsible for performing the duties described 
in proposed Rule 3.31(a)(5)(A)(i)-(vii). In addition, each person 
associated with a TPH who performs such duties shall be required to 
register as a Financial and Operations Principal with the Exchange. 
Proposed Exchange Rule 3.31(a)(5)(C) would require all individuals 
registering as a Financial and Operations Principal to pass the 
Financial and Operations Principal qualification examination before 
such registration may become effective. The Exchange notes that 
proposed Financial and Operations Principal requirements and 
qualifications set forth in Rule 3.31(a)(5) are similar to the 
requirements and qualifications required by other exchanges' rules.\40\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \40\ See, e.g., Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(3)(D) and MIAX Options Rule 
1220(b)(2)(iv). FINRA Rule 1220(a)(4) differs from proposed Exchange 
Rule 3.31(a)(5) in that it includes an Introducing Broker-Dealer 
Financial and Operations Principal registration requirement. 
Further, as discussed above, the Exchange does not propose to adopt 
a Principal Financial Officer or Principal Operations Officer 
requirement similar to FINRA Rule 1220(a)(4)(B), as it believes the 
Financial and Operations Principal requirement is sufficient.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Securities Trader Principal (Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(6))
    Existing Rule 3.30.08 provides that an individual associated with a 
TPH that: (i) Supervises or monitors proprietary trading, market-making 
and/or brokerage activities for broker-dealers; (ii) supervises or 
trains those engaged in proprietary trading, market-making and/or 
effecting transactions on behalf of a broker-dealer, with respect to 
those activities; and/or (iii) is an officer, partner or director of a 
TPH or TPH organization is required to register and qualify as a 
Securities Trader Principal (TP) and satisfy the prerequisite 
registration and qualification requirements. The Rule further provides 
that to qualify for registration as a Securities Trader Principal, such 
person must pass the Series 24 (General Securities Principal) 
qualification examination or the General Securities

[[Page 20767]]

Sales Supervisor Registration and General Securities Principal--Sales 
Supervisor Module Registration (Series 9/10 and Series 23). A 
Securities Trader Principal must also pass the Securities Trader 
(Series 57) qualification examination.\41\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \41\ See Cboe Options Regulatory Circular RG15-180.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In place of Rule 3.30.08, the Exchange proposes to adopt Rule 
3.31(a)(6), Securities Trader Principal. Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(6) 
requires that a principal responsible for supervising the securities 
trading activities specified in proposed Rule 3.31(b)(3), which 
provides for registration in the representative-level ``Securities 
Trader'' category, register as a Securities Trader Principal. The 
proposed rule requires individuals registering as Securities Trader 
Principals to be registered as Securities Traders and to pass the 
General Securities Principal qualification examination. The Exchange 
notes that proposed Rule 3.31(a)(6) is substantively similar to FINRA 
and other exchanges' rules governing Securities Trader Principals.\42\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \42\ See e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(a)(7), NYSE Arca Rule 
2.1220(a)(5) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Registered Options Principal (Proposed Rules 3.31(a)(7))
    Existing Rule 3.30(d) provides that associated persons of a TPH 
that conducts a public customer business must also comply with the 
registration requirements set forth in Chapter 3, which include the 
Registered Options Principal. Rule 3.36 provides no TPH shall be 
approved to transact options business with the public until those 
persons associated with it who are designated as Options Principals 
have been approved by and registered with the Exchange.\43\ Rule 3.36 
also provides that persons engaged in the supervision of options sales 
practices or a person to whom the designated general partner or 
executive officer (pursuant to Rule 9.2) or another Registered Options 
Principal delegates the authority to supervise options sales practices 
shall be designated as Options Principals. Rule 3.36 provides that 
individuals engaged in the supervision of options sales practices and 
designated as Options Principals are required to qualify as an Options 
Principal by passing the Registered Options Principals Examination 
(Series 4) or the Sales Supervision Examination (Series 9/10). Rule 
3.36(c) further provides that individuals who are delegated 
responsibility pursuant to Rule 9.2 for reviewing the acceptance of 
discretionary accounts, for approving exceptions to a TPH 
organization's criteria or standards for uncovered options accounts, 
and for approval of communications, shall be designated as Options 
Principals and are required to qualify as an Options Principal by 
passing the Registered Options Principal Examination (Series 4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \43\ The Exchange proposes to clarify in Rule 3.36 that the 
designated Options Principal(s) must also meet the applicable 
registration requirements in Chapter III.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is proposing to delete Rule 3.30 and in its place 
adopt Rule 3.31(a)(7), Registered Options Principal, which would 
require under its Section (a)(7)(A) that each TPH that is engaged in 
transactions in options with the public to have at least one Registered 
Options Principal.\44\ In addition, each principal as defined in 
paragraph (a)(1) of the Rule who is responsible for supervising a TPH's 
options sales practices with the public would be required to register 
with the Exchange as a Registered Options Principal, subject to the 
following exception. If a principal's options activities are limited 
solely to those activities that may be supervised by a General 
Securities Sales Supervisor, then such person may register as a General 
Securities Sales Supervisor pursuant to paragraph (a)(8) of the Rule in 
lieu of registering as a Registered Options Principal. The proposed 
rule requires individuals registering as Registered Options Principals 
to be registered as General Securities Representatives and to pass the 
Registered Options Principals qualification examination.\45\ The 
Exchange notes that proposed Rule 3.31(a)(7) is substantively similar 
to FINRA and other exchanges' rules regarding Registered Options 
Principals.\46\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \44\ The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 3.36 to conform all 
references to ``Options Principal'' with ``Registered Options 
Principal''.
    \45\ Current Rule 3.36(b) provides that individuals engaged in 
the supervision of options sales practices and designated as Options 
Principals are required to qualify as an Options Principal by 
passing the Registered Options Principals Qualification Examination 
(Series 4) or the Sales Supervisor Qualification Examination (Series 
9/10), and is proposed to be deleted in view of proposed Rule 
3.31(a)(7).
    \46\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(a)(8), NYSE Arca Rule 
2.1220(a)(7) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

General Securities Sales Supervisor (Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(8))
    Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(8) provides that a principal may register 
with the Exchange as a General Securities Sales Supervisor if his or 
her supervisory responsibilities in the investment banking or 
securities business of a TPH are limited to the securities sales 
activities of the TPH, including the approval of customer accounts, 
training of sales and sales supervisory personnel and the maintenance 
of records of original entry or ledger accounts of the TPH required to 
be maintained in branch offices by Exchange Act record-keeping rules.
    A person registering as a General Securities Sales Supervisor must 
satisfy the General Securities Representative prerequisite registration 
and pass the General Securities Sales Supervisor examinations. 
Moreover, a General Securities Sales Supervisor is precluded from 
performing any of the following activities: (1) Supervision of market-
making commitments; (2) supervision of the custody of firm or customer 
funds or securities for purposes of Exchange Act Rule 15c3-3; or (3) 
supervision of overall compliance with financial responsibility rules. 
The Exchange notes that proposed Rule 3.31(a)(8) is substantively 
similar to FINRA and other exchanges' rules governing General 
Securities Sales Supervisors.\47\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \47\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(a)(10), NYSE Arca Rule 
2.1220(a)(6) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(10).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Definition of Representative (Proposed Rule 3.31(b)(1))
    The Exchange proposes to adopt a definition for the term 
``representative'' in proposed Exchange Rule 3.31(b)(1). Currently, the 
Exchange's rules do not define the term ``representative,'' although 
Rule 3.37(a) states that persons who perform duties for the TPH that 
are customarily performed by sales representatives' solicitors, or 
branch office managers shall be designated as Representatives.\48\ 
Proposed Rule 3.31(b)(1) will define a representative as any person 
associated with an TPH, including assistant officers other than 
principals, who is engaged in TPH's investment banking or securities 
business, such as supervision, solicitation, conduct of business in 
securities or the training of persons associated with a TPH for any of 
these functions. The Exchange notes that proposed ``representative'' 
definition is substantively similar to the definition used by FINRA and 
other exchange rules.\49\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \48\ The Exchange proposes to eliminate this language under Rule 
3.37(a) in view of the proposed definition under Rule 3.31(b)(1).
    \49\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(b)(1), NYSE Arca Rule 
2.1220(b)(1) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

General Securities Representative (Proposed Rule 3.31(b)(2))
    Under current Rule 3.37(d), a person accepting orders from non-TPH 
customers (unless such customer is a broker-dealer registered with the

[[Page 20768]]

Commission) is required to register with the Exchange and to be 
qualified by passing the General Securities Representatives Examination 
(Series 7).
    Proposed Rule 3.31(b)(2)(A) states that each representative as 
defined in proposed Rule 3.31(b)(1) is required to register with the 
Exchange as a General Securities Representative, subject to the 
following exceptions. The proposed rule provides that if a 
representative's activities include the function of a Securities 
Trader, then the representative must appropriately register in that 
category.
    The proposed rule further provides that each person seeking to 
register as a General Securities Representative shall, prior to or 
concurrent with such registration, pass the SIE and the General 
Securities Representative qualification examinations. The Exchange 
notes that proposed Rule 3.31(b)(2) is substantively similar to FINRA 
and other exchanges' rules governing General Securities 
Representatives.\50\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \50\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(b)(2), NYSE Arca Rule 
2.1220(b)(2) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Securities Trader (Proposed Rule 3.31(b)(3))
    Pursuant to current Rule 3.30.08, associated persons must pass the 
qualification examination for Securities Trader (the Series 57 
examination) and SIE and register with the Exchange as a Securities 
Trader if that person is engaged in proprietary trading, market-making 
and/or effecting transactions on behalf of a broker-dealer.
    The Exchange proposes to delete Rule 3.30 and with respect to the 
Securities Trader requirement, replace it with proposed Rule 
3.31(b)(3). Rule 3.31(b)(3) would require each representative as 
defined in Rule 3.31(b)(1) to register with the Exchange as a 
Securities Trader if, with respect to transactions in equity, preferred 
or convertible debt securities, or options, such person is engaged in 
proprietary trading or Market Making, the execution of transactions on 
an agency basis, or the direct supervision of such activities other 
than a person associated with a TPH whose trading activities are 
conducted principally on behalf of an investment company that is 
registered with the SEC pursuant to the Investment Company Act and that 
controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with a TPH. Rule 
3.31(b)(3) would continue to require individuals registering as 
Securities Traders to pass the SIE as well as the Securities Trader 
qualification exam.
    Additionally, proposed Rule 3.31(b)(3)(A) would require each person 
associated with a TPH who is: (i) Primarily responsible for the design, 
development or significant modification of an algorithmic trading 
strategy relating to equity, preferred or convertible debt securities 
or options; or (ii) responsible for the day-to-day supervision or 
direction of such activities to register with the Exchange as a 
Securities Trader.\51\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \51\ This new registration requirement was recently added to the 
FINRA Rulebook. The Exchange, like other Exchanges such as Nasdaq 
(see Nasdaq Rule 1220(b)(4)(A)) has determined to add a parallel 
requirement to its own rules, but also to add options and market 
making to the scope of products and activities, respectively, within 
the proposed rule's coverage. See SR-FINRA-2016-007, 81 FR 21914.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For purposes of this proposed new registration requirement an 
``algorithmic trading strategy'' is an automated system that generates 
or routes orders (or order-related messages) but does not include an 
automated system that solely routes orders received in their entirety 
to a market center. The proposed registration requirement applies to 
orders and order related messages whether ultimately routed or sent to 
be routed to an exchange or over the counter. An order router alone 
would not constitute an algorithmic trading strategy. However, an order 
router that performs any additional functions would be considered an 
algorithmic trading strategy. An algorithm that solely generates 
trading ideas or investment allocations--including an automated 
investment service that constructs portfolio recommendations--but that 
is not equipped to automatically generate orders and order-related 
messages to effectuate such trading ideas into the market-- whether 
independently or via a linked router--would not constitute an 
algorithmic trading strategy.\52\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \52\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The associated persons covered by the expanded registration 
requirement would be required to pass the requisite qualification 
examination and be subject to the same continuing education 
requirements that are applicable to individual Securities Traders. The 
Exchange believes that potentially problematic conduct stemming from 
algorithmic trading strategies--such as failure to check for order 
accuracy, inappropriate levels of messaging traffic, and inadequate 
risk management controls--could be reduced or prevented, in part, 
through improved education regarding securities regulations for the 
specified individuals involved in the algorithm design and development 
process.
    The proposal is intended to ensure the registration of one or more 
associated persons that possesses knowledge of, and responsibility for, 
both the design of the intended trading strategy and the technological 
implementation of the strategy, sufficient to evaluate whether the 
resulting product is designed to achieve regulatory compliance in 
addition to business objectives. For example, a lead developer who 
liaises with a head trader regarding the head trader's desired 
algorithmic trading strategy and is primarily responsible for the 
supervision of the development of the algorithm to meet such objectives 
must be registered under the proposal as the associated person 
primarily responsible for the development of the algorithmic trading 
strategy and supervising or directing the team of developers. 
Individuals under the lead developer's supervision would not be 
required to register under the proposal if they are not primarily 
responsible for the development of the algorithmic trading strategy or 
are not responsible for the day-to-day supervision or direction of 
others on the team. Under this scenario, the person on the business 
side that is primarily responsible for the design of the algorithmic 
trading strategy, as communicated to the lead developer, also would be 
required to register. In the event of a significant modification to the 
algorithm, TPHs, likewise, would be required to ensure that the 
associated person primarily responsible for the significant 
modification (or the associated person supervising or directing such 
activity), is registered as a Securities Trader.
    A TPH employing an algorithm is responsible for the algorithm's 
activities whether the algorithm is designed or developed in house or 
by a third-party. Thus, in all cases, robust supervisory procedures, 
both before and after deployment of an algorithmic trading strategy, 
are a key component in protecting against problematic behavior stemming 
from algorithmic trading. In addition, associated persons responsible 
for monitoring or reviewing the performance of an algorithmic trading 
strategy must be registered, and a TPH's trading activity must always 
be supervised by an appropriately registered person. Therefore, even 
where a firm purchases an algorithm off-the-shelf and does not 
significantly modify the algorithm, the associated person responsible 
for monitoring or reviewing the performance of the algorithm would be 
required to be registered.
    The Exchange notes that proposed Rule 3.31(b)(3) is substantively 
similar

[[Page 20769]]

to FINRA and other exchanges' rules governing Securities Traders.\53\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \53\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(b)(4), NYSE Arca Rule 
2.1220(b)(3) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Foreign Registrations (Proposed Rule 3.31.01)
    Current Rule 3.30.09 and Rule 3.37(e) provide that any person who 
is in good standing as a representative with the Financial Conduct 
Authority in the United Kingdom or with a Canadian stock exchange or 
securities regulator shall be exempt from the requirement to pass the 
SIE. The Exchange proposes to relocate the language contained in Rule 
3.30.09 (which rule is being deleted) and Rule 3.37(e) to new Rule 3.31 
Interpretation and Policy .01 as Rule 3.31 governs the SIE requirements 
and as the relocation is consistent with the location of the provision 
in the rules of other exchanges.\54\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \54\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220.01, NYSE Arca Rule 2.1220.01 and 
Nasdaq Rule 1220.01.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Additional Qualification Requirements for Persons Engaged in Security 
Futures Activities (Proposed Rule 3.31.02)
    The Exchange is also proposing to adopt Rule 3.31.02, which 
provides that each person who is registered with the Exchange as a 
Registered Options Principal, General Securities Representative, 
Options Representative, or General Securities Sales Supervisor shall be 
eligible to engage in security futures activities as a principal 
provided that such individual completes a Firm Element program as set 
forth in proposed Rule 3.33 that addresses security futures products 
before such person engages in security futures activities.\55\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \55\ Unlike FINRA Rule 1220.02, proposed Exchange Rule 3.31.02 
omits references to United Kingdom Securities Representatives and 
Canada Securities Representatives, which are registration categories 
the Exchange does not recognize. In any event, the Exchange does not 
currently offer security futures products for trading.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

TPHs With One Registered Options Principal (Proposed Rule 3.31.03)
    The Exchange proposes to adopt new Rule 3.31 Interpretation and 
Policy .03 which requires notification to the Exchange by a TPH that 
has one Registered Options Principal in the event such person is 
terminated, resigns, becomes incapacitated or is otherwise unable to 
perform the duties of a Registered Options Principal, and imposes 
certain restrictions on the TPH's options business in that event.\56\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \56\ See Proposed Rule 3.31.03. Proposed Rule 3.31.03 is similar 
to corresponding FINRA Rule 1220.03, NYSE Arca Rule 2.1220.04 and 
Nasdaq Rule 1220.03.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of General Securities Sales Supervisor Registration Category 
(Proposed Rule 3.31.04)
    Proposed Rule 3.31.04 explains the purpose of the General 
Securities Sales Supervisor registration category. The General 
Securities Sales Supervisor category is an alternate category of 
registration designed to lessen the qualification burdens on principals 
of general securities firms who supervise sales. Without this category 
of limited registration, such principals would be required to 
separately qualify pursuant to the rules of FINRA, the MSRB, and the 
Cboe options exchanges. While persons may continue to separately 
qualify with all relevant self-regulatory organizations, the General 
Securities Sales Supervisor examination permits qualification as a 
supervisor of sales of all securities through one registration 
category. Persons registered as General Securities Sales Supervisors 
may also qualify in any other category of principal registration. 
Persons who are already qualified in one or more categories of 
principal General Securities Sales Supervisors may supervise sales 
activities of all securities by also qualifying as General Securities 
Sales Supervisors. The proposed rule further provides that any person 
required to be registered as a principal who supervises sales 
activities in corporate, municipal and option securities, investment 
company products, variable contracts, and security futures (subject to 
the requirements of Rule 3.31.02) may be registered solely as a General 
Securities Sales Supervisor. In addition to branch office managers, 
other persons such as regional and national sales managers may also be 
registered solely as General Securities Sales Supervisors as long as 
they supervise only sales activities. Proposed Rule 3.31.04 is similar 
to corresponding FINRA and other exchanges' rules.\57\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \57\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220.04, NYSE Arca Rule 2.1220.03 and 
Nasdaq Rule 1220.04.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of Qualification Requirements (Proposed Rule 3.31.05)
    Proposed Rule 3.31.05 provides a table summary of the categories of 
registration and applicable qualifications and alternative 
qualifications set forth throughout Rule 3.31.
Associated Persons Exempt From Registration (Proposed Rule 3.32)
    Existing Rule 3.30(2) currently provides that the following persons 
associated with a TPH are not required to register: (a) Individual 
associated persons whose functions are solely and exclusively clerical 
or ministerial; (b) individual TPHs and individual associated persons 
who are not actively engaged in the securities business; (c) individual 
TPHs and individual associated persons whose functions are related 
solely and exclusively to the TPH's or TPH organization's need for 
nominal corporate officers or for capital participation; (d) individual 
associated persons that are restricted from accessing the Exchange 
(physically and electronically) and that do not engage in the 
securities business of the TPH or TPH organization relating to activity 
that occurs on the Exchange; and (e) individual associated persons 
whose functions are related solely and exclusively to: (i) Transactions 
in commodities; (ii) transactions in security futures; and/or (iii) 
effecting transactions on the floor of another national securities 
exchange and who are registered as floor members with such exchange.
    The Exchange is proposing to adopt Rule 3.30(2) as Rule 3.32 
subject to certain changes. Rule 3.30 exempts from registration those 
associated persons who are not actively engaged in the securities 
business. It also exempts from registration those associated persons 
whose functions are related solely and exclusively to a member's need 
for nominal corporate officers or for capital participation.\58\ The 
Exchange believes that the determination of whether an associated 
person is required to register must be based on an analysis of the 
person's activities and functions in the context of the various 
registration categories. Proposed Rule 3.32 provides an exemption from 
registration with the Exchange for certain associated persons. 
Specifically, the proposed rule provides that persons associated with a 
TPH whose functions are solely and exclusively clerical or ministerial 
would be exempt from registration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \58\ These exemptions generally apply to associated persons who 
are corporate officers of a TPH in name only to meet specific 
corporate legal obligations or who only provide capital for a member 
but have no other role in a TPH's business.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA Rule 1230 provides an exemption from registration with FINRA 
to persons associated with a FINRA member whose functions are solely 
and exclusively clerical or ministerial and persons associated with a 
FINRA member whose functions are related solely and exclusively to (i) 
effecting transactions on the floor of a national securities exchange 
and who are appropriately registered with such exchange; (ii) effecting 
transactions in municipal securities; (iii) effecting transactions in 
commodities; or (iv)

[[Page 20770]]

effecting transactions in security futures, provided that any such 
person is registered with a registered futures association. TPHs do not 
solely and exclusively engage in any of the foregoing transactions and 
therefore the Exchange is not adopting that portion of FINRA Rule 1230. 
Proposed Rule 3.32 is similar to other exchanges' corresponding 
rules.\59\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \59\ See, e.g., NYSE Arca Rule 2.1230.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to adopt Rule 3.32.01 to clarify that the 
function of accepting customer orders is not considered a clerical or 
ministerial function and that associated persons who accept customer 
orders under any circumstances are required to be appropriately 
registered. However, the proposed rule provides that an associated 
person is not accepting a customer order where occasionally, when an 
appropriately registered person is unavailable, the associated person 
transcribes the order details and the registered person contacts the 
customer to confirm the order details before entering the order.
Changes to Continuing Education Requirements (Proposed Rule 3.33)
    Existing Rule 3.33 (Continuing Education for Registered Persons), 
includes a Regulatory Element and a Firm Element. The Regulatory 
Element applies to registered persons and consists of periodic 
computer-based training on regulatory, compliance, ethical, supervisory 
subjects and sales practice standards. The Firm Element consists of at 
least annual, TPH-developed and administered training programs designed 
to keep covered registered persons current regarding securities 
products, services and strategies offered by the TPH.
Regulatory Element
    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 3.33(a) to provide, consistent 
with proposed Rule 3.30.09, that a waiver-eligible person would be 
subject to a Regulatory Element program that correlates to his or her 
most recent registration category, and that the content of the 
Regulatory Element would be based on the same cycle had the individual 
remain registered. The proposed rule change is similar to FINRA's and 
other exchanges' rules.\60\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \60\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1240(a)(1), NYSE ARCA Rules 
2.23(d)(1) and 2.24(d)(1), and Nasdaq Rule 1240(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 3.33(a)(1) to provide 
that any person whose registration has been deemed inactive under the 
rule may not accept or solicit business or receive any compensation for 
the purchase or sale of securities. The proposed amendment provides, 
however, that such person may receive trail or residual commissions 
resulting from transactions completed before the inactive status, 
unless the TPH with which the person is associated has a policy 
prohibiting such trail or residual commissions. The proposed amendment 
to Rule 3.33(a)(1) also provides that if a waiver-eligible person fails 
to complete the Regulatory Element during the prescribed time frames, 
he or she would lose waiver eligibility.\61\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \61\ See FINRA Rule 1240(a)(2), NYSE ARCA Rules 2.23(d)(1) and 
2.24(d)(1), and Nasdaq Rule 1240(a)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 3.33(a)(2) to provide that 
unless otherwise determined by the Exchange, a registered person other 
than a person designated as eligible for a waiver pursuant to Rule 
3.30.09 will be required to re-take the Regulatory Element and satisfy 
all of its requirements under certain circumstances.\62\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \62\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Lastly, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 3.33(a)(3) to provide 
that the Exchange offers Regulatory Elements for Exchange registered 
persons: the S201 for registered principals and supervisors, the S106 
for persons registered only as Investment Company and Variable 
Contracts Representatives, and the S101 for all other registered 
persons.\63\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \63\ See NYSE Arca Rule 2.23(d)(1)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Firm Element
    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 3.33(c)(1) to provide that any 
registered person or any or any associated person who has direct 
contact with customers in the conduct of the TPH's or TPH 
organization's securities sales, trading or investment banking 
activities, and to the immediate supervisors of such persons, is 
subject to the Firm Element.\64\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \64\ See FINRA Rule 1240(b)(1), NYSE Arca Rule 2.23(d)(2)(A) and 
Nasdaq Rule 1240(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that training in ethics and professional 
responsibility should apply to all registered persons. Therefore, 
proposed Rule 3.33(c)(2)(ii), which provides that the Firm Element 
training programs must cover applicable regulatory requirements, would 
also require that a firm's training program cover training in ethics 
and professional responsibility. The proposed change to the Firm 
Element section of proposed Rule 3.33 is similar to changes made by 
other exchanges. \65\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \65\ See FINRA Rule 1240(b)(2)(B), NYSE Arca Rules 
2.23(d)(2)(B)(ii) and 2.24(d)(2)(B) and Nasdaq Rule 1240(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Electronic Filing Rules (Proposed Rule 3.34)
    The Exchange is proposing to adopt new Rule 3.34, Electronic Filing 
Requirements for Uniform Forms, which, among other things, will 
consolidate various Web CRD Form U4 and U5 electronic filing 
requirements in a single location and also would impose certain new 
requirements. More specifically, current Rule 3.30, Interpretations and 
Polices .01--.03, state that each individual required to register shall 
electronically file a Uniform Application for Securities Industry 
Registration (``Form U4'') through the Central Registration Depository 
system (``Web CRD'') operated by FINRA and to electronically submit to 
Web CRD any required amendments to Form U4. Further, any TPH or TPH 
organization that discharges or terminates the employment or retention 
of an individual required to register must comply with certain 
termination filing requirements, which include the filing of a Form U5. 
Form U4 and Form U5 electronic filing requirements applicable to 
options principals and representatives, as well a Form U5 requirement 
applicable to members upon termination of employment of any of their 
registered persons, are found in Exchange Rules 3.36 and 3.37. The 
Exchange proposes to delete current Exchange Rule 3.30, Interpretations 
and Polices .01-.03, and the electronic filing requirements of Exchange 
Rules 3.36 \66\ and 3.37 \67\, and to replace them with proposed Rule 
3.34, Electronic Filing Requirements for Uniform Forms, which will 
consolidate Form U4 and Form U5 electronic filing requirements into a 
single rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \66\ See current Rule 3.36(a).
    \67\ See current Rule 3.37(a), (b) and (c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    First, proposed Rule 3.34(a) would provide that all forms required 
to be filed under the Exchange's registration rules shall be filed 
through an electronic process or such other process as the Exchange may 
prescribe to Web CRD.
    Under Rule 3.34(b), TPHs would be required to designate registered 
principal(s) or corporate officer(s) who are responsible for 
supervising a firm's electronic filings. The registered principal(s) or 
corporate officer(s) who has or have the responsibility to review and 
approve the forms filed pursuant to the rule would be required to

[[Page 20771]]

acknowledge, electronically, that he or she is filing this information 
on behalf of the member and the member's associated persons. Under Rule 
3.34.01, the registered principal(s) or corporate officer(s) could 
delegate filing responsibilities to an associated person (who need not 
be registered) but could not delegate any of the supervision, review, 
and approval responsibilities mandated in Rule 3.34(b). The registered 
principal(s) or corporate officer(s) would be required to take 
reasonable and appropriate action to ensure that all delegated 
electronic filing functions were properly executed and supervised.
    Under Rule 3.34(c)(1), initial and transfer electronic Form U4 
filings and any amendments to the disclosure information on Form U4 
must be based on a manually signed Form U4 provided to the TPH or 
applicant for membership by the person on whose behalf the Form U4 is 
being filed. As part of the TPH's recordkeeping requirements, it would 
be required to retain the person's manually signed Form U4 or 
amendments to the disclosure information on Form U4 in accordance with 
Rule 17a4(e)(1) under the Act and make them available promptly upon 
regulatory request. An applicant for membership must also retain every 
manually signed Form U4 it receives during the application process and 
make them available promptly upon regulatory request. Rule 3.34(c)(2) 
and Interpretation and Policy .03 and 04 provide for the electronic 
filing of Form U4 amendments without the individual's manual signature, 
subject to certain safeguards and procedures.
    Rule 3.34(d) provides that upon filing an electronic Form U4 on 
behalf of a person applying for registration, a TPH must promptly 
submit fingerprint information for that person and that the Exchange 
may make a registration effective pending receipt of the fingerprint 
information. It further provides that if a TPH fails to submit the 
fingerprint information within 30 days after filing of an electronic 
Form U4, the person's registration will be deemed inactive, requiring 
the person to immediately cease all activities requiring registration 
or performing any duties and functioning in any capacity requiring 
registration. Under the rule the Exchange must administratively 
terminate a registration that is inactive for a period of two years. A 
person whose registration is administratively terminated could 
reactivate the registration only by reapplying for registration and 
meeting the qualification requirements of the applicable provisions of 
proposed Exchange Rule 3.31. Upon application and a showing of good 
cause, the Exchange could extend the 30-day period.
    Rule 3.34(e) would require initial filings and amendments of Form 
U5 to be submitted electronically. As part of the TPH's recordkeeping 
requirements, it would be required to retain such records for a period 
of not less than three years, the first two years in an easily 
accessible place, in accordance with Rule 17a-4 under the Act, and to 
make such records available promptly upon regulatory request.
    Finally, proposed Rule 3.34.02 would provide a TPH could enter into 
an agreement with a third party pursuant to which the third party 
agrees to file the required forms electronically on behalf of the TPH 
and the TPH's associated persons. Notwithstanding the existence of such 
an agreement, the TPH would remain responsible for complying with the 
requirements of the Rule.
Implementation Date
    The Exchange proposes to announce the implementation date of the 
proposed rule change in an Exchange Notice, to be published no later 
than thirty (30) days following the operative date. The implementation 
date will be no later than sixty (60) days following the operative 
date, with the exception of the new registration requirement for 
developers of algorithmic trading strategies which would become 
effective 180 days following the implementation date.\68\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \68\ The Exchange believes it is appropriate to provide TPHs 
more lead time for implementation of the requirement for developers 
of algorithmic trading to become Securities Trader, as such 
requirement may trigger new testing requirements for individuals who 
otherwise weren't required to register prior to this rule change. 
The proposed implementation period is also consistent with the 
amount of time provided for compliance by other exchanges that have 
adopted the proposed requirement. See, e.g., Exchange Act Release 
No. 84386 (October 9, 2018), 83 FR 51988 (October 15, 2018) (SR-
NASDAQ-2018-078).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with 
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the 
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the 
Act.\69\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change 
is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \70\ requirements that the rules 
of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts 
and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to 
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, 
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and 
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and 
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market 
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. 
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is 
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \71\ requirement that the rules of 
an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between 
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \69\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \70\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \71\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will 
streamline, and bring consistency and uniformity to, the registration 
rules, which will, in turn, assist TPHs and their associated persons in 
complying with these rules and improve regulatory efficiency. The 
proposed rule change will also improve the efficiency of the 
examination program, without compromising the qualification standards, 
by eliminating duplicative testing of general securities knowledge on 
examinations and by removing examinations that currently have limited 
utility. In addition, the proposed rule change will expand the scope of 
permissive registrations, which, among other things, will allow TPHs to 
develop a depth of associated persons with registrations to respond to 
unanticipated personnel changes and will encourage greater regulatory 
understanding. Further, the proposed rule change will provide a more 
streamlined and effective waiver process for individuals working for a 
financial services industry affiliate of a TPH, and it will require 
such individuals to maintain specified levels of competence and 
knowledge while working in areas ancillary to the securities business. 
The proposed rule change will improve the supervisory structure of 
firms by imposing an experience requirement for representatives that 
are designated by firms to function as principals for a 120-day period 
before having to pass an appropriate principal qualification 
examination. The proposed rule change will also prohibit unregistered 
persons from accepting customer orders under any circumstances, which 
will enhance investor protection.
    The extension of the Securities Trader registration requirement to 
developers of algorithmic trading strategies requires associated 
persons primarily responsible for the design, development or 
significant modification of an algorithmic trading strategy or 
responsible for the day-to-day supervision or direction of such

[[Page 20772]]

activities to register and meet a minimum standard of knowledge 
regarding the securities rules and regulations applicable to the TPH 
employing the algorithmic trading strategy. This minimum standard of 
knowledge is identical to the standard of knowledge currently 
applicable to traditional securities traders. The Exchange believes 
that improved education of firm personnel may reduce the potential for 
problematic market conduct and manipulative trading activity.
    Finally, the proposed rule change makes organizational changes to 
the Exchange's registration and qualification rules to align them with 
registration and qualification rules of other exchanges as discussed 
above, in order to prevent unnecessary regulatory burdens and to 
promote efficient administration of the rules. The change also makes 
minor updates and corrections to the Exchange's rules which improve 
readability.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange believes that 
the proposed rule changes which are, in all material respects, based 
upon and substantially similar to, recent rule changes adopted by FINRA 
and/or other national securities exchanges, will reduce the regulatory 
burden placed on market participants engaged in trading activities 
across different markets. The Exchange believes that the harmonization 
of these registration requirements across the various markets will 
reduce burdens on competition by removing impediments to participation 
in the national market system and promoting competition among 
participants across the multiple national securities exchanges.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received written comments on the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not:
    A. Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public 
interest;
    B. impose any significant burden on competition; and
    C. become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was 
filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has 
become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \72\ and 
Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \73\ thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the 
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may 
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission 
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, 
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the 
Commission will institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed 
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \72\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \73\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-CBOE-2021-022 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2021-022. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments 
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are 
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying 
information from comment submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2021-022 and should be submitted on 
or before May 12, 2021.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\74\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \74\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-08147 Filed 4-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P