Document ID: SEC-2023-1228-0001
Agency: sec
Document Type: Notice
Title: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes: NYSE Arca, Inc.
Posted Date: 2023-10-27T04:00Z

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 207 (Friday, October 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73892-73912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23703]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-98780; File No. SR-NYSEARCA-2023-70]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing 
of Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Shares of the Grayscale 
Ethereum Trust Under NYSE Arca Rule 8.201-E (Commodity-Based Trust 
Shares)

October 23, 2023.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given 
that, on October 10, 2023, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or the 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit

[[Page 73893]]

comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to list and trade shares of the following 
under NYSE Arca Rule 8.201-E: Grayscale Ethereum Trust (ETH) (the 
``Trust'').\4\ The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and 
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Trust was previously named Ethereum Investment Trust, 
whose name was changed pursuant to a Certificate of Amendment to the 
Certificate of Trust of Ethereum Investment Trust filed with the 
Delaware Secretary of State on January 11, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Under NYSE Arca Rule 8.201-E, the Exchange may propose to list and/
or trade pursuant to unlisted trading privileges ``Commodity-Based 
Trust Shares.'' \5\ The Exchange proposes to list and trade shares 
(``Shares'') \6\ of the Trust pursuant to NYSE Arca Rule 8.201-E.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Commodity-Based Trust Shares are securities issued by a 
trust that represent investors' discrete identifiable and undivided 
beneficial ownership interest in the commodities deposited into the 
Trust.
    \6\ The Shares are expected to be listed under the ticker symbol 
``ETH.''
    \7\ On April 17, 2020, the Trust confidentially filed its draft 
registration statement on Form 10 under the '34 Act) (File No. 377-
03131) (the ``Draft Registration Statement on Form 10''). On June 
16, 2020, the Trust confidentially filed Amendment No. 1 to the 
Draft Registration Statement on Form 10. The Jumpstart Our Business 
Startups Act (the ``JOBS Act''), enacted on April 5, 2012, added 
Section 6(e) to the Securities Act of 1933 (the ``Securities Act'' 
or ``'33 Act''). Section 6(e) of the Securities Act provides that an 
``emerging growth company'' may confidentially submit to the 
Commission a draft registration statement for confidential, non-
public review by the Commission staff prior to public filing, 
provided that the initial confidential submission and all amendments 
thereto shall be publicly filed not later than 21 days before the 
date on which the issuer conducts a road show, as such term is 
defined in Securities Act Rule 433(h)(4). An emerging growth company 
is defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Securities Act as an issuer 
with less than $1,000,000,000 total annual gross revenues during its 
most recently completed fiscal year. The Trust meets the definition 
of an emerging growth company and consequently submitted its Draft 
Registration Statement on Form 10 to the Commission on a 
confidential basis. On August 6, 2020, the Trust filed its 
registration statement on Form 10 under the Securities Act (File No. 
000-56193) (the ``Registration Statement on Form 10''). On October 
2, 2020, the Trust filed Amendment No. 1 to the Registration 
Statement on Form 10. On, October 5, 2020, the Registration 
Statement on Form 10 was automatically deemed effective. On March 5, 
2021, February 25, 2022, and March 1, 2023, the Trust filed its 
annual report on Form 10-K under the Securities Act (File No. 000-
56193) (the ``Annual Reports''). On November 6, 2020, May 7, 2021, 
August 6, 2021, November 5, 2021, May 6, 2022, August 5, 2022, 
November 4, 2022, May 5, 2023 and August 4, 2023, the Trust filed 
its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q under the Securities Act (File 
No. 000-56193) (the ``Quarterly Reports''). The descriptions of the 
Trust, the Shares, and ETH contained herein are based, in part, on 
the Annual Reports and Quarterly Reports. On January 17, 2019, the 
Trust submitted to the Commission an amended Form D as a business 
trust. Shares of the Trust have been quoted on OTC Market's OTCQX 
Best Marketplace under the symbol ``ETHE'' since June 20, 2019. On 
May 23, 2019 and March 20, 2020, the Trust published annual reports 
for ETHE for the periods ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 
2019, respectively. On May 23, 2019, August 8, 2019, November 11, 
2019, May 8, 2020, and August 6, 2020, the Trust published quarterly 
reports for ETHE for the periods ended March 31, 2019, June 30, 
2019, September 30, 2019, March 31, 2020, and June 30, 2020, 
respectively. Reports published before October 5, 2020, the date on 
which the Trust's Shares became registered pursuant to Section 12(g) 
of the Act, can be found on OTC Market's website (https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/ETHE/disclosure), and reports published on 
or after October 5, 2020 can be found on OTC Market's website and 
the Commission's website (https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1725210&owner=exclude). The Shares will be of the same class 
and will have the same rights as shares of ETHE. According to the 
Sponsor, freely tradeable shares of ETHE will remain freely 
tradeable Shares on the date of the listing of the Shares that are 
unregistered under the Securities Act. Restricted shares of ETHE 
will remain subject to private placement restrictions on such date, 
and the holders of such restricted shares will continue to hold 
those Shares subject to those restrictions until they become freely 
tradable Shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Trust is the world's largest Ethereum (``ETH'') investment fund 
by assets under management as of the date of this filing. The Trust has 
approximately $4.8 billion in assets under management \8\ (representing 
2.5% of all ETH in circulation), its Shares trade millions of dollars 
in daily volume and are held by more than a quarter of a million 
American investor accounts seeking exposure to ETH without the cost and 
complexity of purchasing the asset directly. However, because the Trust 
is not currently listed as an exchange-traded product (``ETP''), the 
value of the Shares has not been able to closely track the value of the 
Trust's underlying ETH. The Sponsor thus believes that allowing Shares 
of the Trust to list and trade on the Exchange as an ETP (i.e., 
converting the Trust to a spot Ethereum ETP) would unlock over $1.6 
billion of value \9\ for the Trust's shareholders and provide other 
investors with a safe and secure way to invest in ETH on a regulated 
national securities exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ As of September 28, 2023.
    \9\ As of September 28, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The sponsor of the Trust is Grayscale Investments, LLC 
(``Sponsor''), a Delaware limited liability company. The Sponsor is a 
wholly owned subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, Inc. (``Digital 
Currency Group''). The trustee for the Trust is Delaware Trust Company 
(``Trustee''). The custodian for the Trust is Coinbase Custody Trust 
Company, LLC (``Custodian'').\10\ The distribution and marketing agent 
for the Trust is Grayscale Securities, LLC (the ``Marketing Agent''). 
The index provider for the Trust is CoinDesk Indices, Inc. (the ``Index 
Provider'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ According to the Annual Report, Digital Currency Group owns 
a minority interest in Coinbase, Inc., which is the parent company 
of the Custodian, representing less than 1.0% of its equity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Trust is a Delaware statutory trust, formed on December 13, 
2017, that operates pursuant to a trust agreement between the Sponsor 
and the Trustee (``Trust Agreement''). The Trust has no fixed 
termination date.
Operation of the Trust
    According to the Annual Report, the Trust's assets consist solely 
of ETH, Incidental Rights,\11\ IR Virtual Currency,\12\ proceeds from 
the sale of ETH, Incidental Rights, and IR Virtual Currency pending use 
of such cash for payment of Additional Trust Expenses \13\ or 
distribution to

[[Page 73894]]

shareholders, and any rights of the Trust pursuant to any agreements, 
other than the Trust Agreement, to which the Trust is a party. Each 
Share represents a proportional interest, based on the total number of 
Shares outstanding, in each of the Trust's assets as determined by 
reference to the Index Price,\14\ less the Trust's expenses and other 
liabilities (which include accrued but unpaid fees and expenses). The 
Sponsor expects that the market price of the Shares will fluctuate over 
time in response to the market prices of ETH. In addition, because the 
Shares reflect the estimated accrued but unpaid expenses of the Trust, 
the number of ETH represented by a Share will gradually decrease over 
time as the Trust's ETH are used to pay the Trust's expenses. The Trust 
does not expect to take any Incidental Rights or IR Virtual Currency it 
may hold into account for purposes of determining the Trust's ``Digital 
Asset Holdings'' (as described below) or the Digital Asset Holdings per 
Share.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ ``Incidental Rights'' are rights to acquire, or otherwise 
establish dominion and control over, any virtual currency or other 
asset or right, which rights are incident to the Trust's ownership 
of ETH and arise without any action of the Trust, or of the Sponsor 
or Trustee on behalf of the Trust.
    \12\ ``IR Virtual Currency'' is any virtual currency tokens, or 
other asset or right, acquired by the Trust through the exercise 
(subject to the applicable provisions of the Trust Agreement) of any 
Incidental Right.
    \13\ ``Additional Trust Expenses'' are any expenses incurred by 
the Trust in addition to the Sponsor's Fee that are not Sponsor-paid 
Expenses, including, but not limited to, (i) taxes and governmental 
charges, (ii) expenses and costs of any extraordinary services 
performed by the Sponsor (or any other service provider) on behalf 
of the Trust to protect the Trust or the interests of shareholders 
(including in connection with any Incidental Rights, any IR Virtual 
Currency, or any other staking consideration), (iii) any 
indemnification of the Custodian or other agents, service providers 
or counterparties of the Trust, (iv) the fees and expenses related 
to the listing, quotation or trading of the Shares on any Secondary 
Market (including legal, marketing and audit fees and expenses) to 
the extent exceeding $600,000 in any given fiscal year and (v) 
extraordinary legal fees and expenses, including any legal fees and 
expenses incurred in connection with litigation, regulatory 
enforcement or investigation matters.
    \14\ The ``Index Price'' means the U.S. dollar value of an ETH 
derived from the Digital Asset Exchanges that are reflected in the 
Index, calculated at 4:00 p.m., New York time, on each business day. 
For purposes of the Trust Agreement, the term ETH Index Price has 
the same meaning as the Index Price as defined herein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The activities of the Trust are limited to (i) issuing ``Baskets'' 
(as defined below) in exchange for ETH transferred to the Trust as 
consideration in connection with creations, (ii) transferring or 
selling ETH, Incidental Rights, IR Virtual Currency, or any other 
staking consideration as necessary to cover the ``Sponsor's Fee'' and/
or certain Trust expenses, (iii) transferring ETH in exchange for 
Baskets surrendered for redemption (subject to obtaining regulatory 
approval from the SEC and approval of the Sponsor), (iv) causing the 
Sponsor to sell ETH, Incidental Rights, IR Virtual Currency, or any 
other staking consideration on the termination of the Trust, (v) making 
distributions of Incidental Rights, IR Virtual Currency, and/or any 
other staking consideration, or cash from the sale thereof, and (vi) 
engaging in all administrative and security procedures necessary to 
accomplish such activities in accordance with the provisions of the 
Trust Agreement, the Custodian Agreement, the Index License Agreement, 
and the Participant Agreements.
    In addition, the Trust may engage in any lawful activity necessary 
or desirable in order to facilitate shareholders' access to Incidental 
Rights or IR Virtual Currency, provided that such activities do not 
conflict with the terms of the Trust Agreement. The Trust will not be 
actively managed. It will not engage in any activities designed to 
obtain a profit from, or to ameliorate losses caused by, changes in the 
market prices of ETH.
Investment Objective
    According to the Annual Report, and as further described below, the 
Trust's investment objective is for the value of the Shares (based on 
ETH per Share) to reflect the value of the ETH held by the Trust, 
determined by reference to the Index Price, less the Trust's expenses 
and other liabilities. While an investment in the Shares is not a 
direct investment in ETH, the Shares are designed to provide investors 
with a cost-effective and convenient way to gain investment exposure to 
ETH. A substantial direct investment in ETH may require expensive and 
sometimes complicated arrangements in connection with the acquisition, 
security and safekeeping of the ETH and may involve the payment of 
substantial fees to acquire such ETH from third-party facilitators 
through cash payments of U.S. dollars. Because the value of the Shares 
is correlated with the value of ETH held by the Trust, it is important 
to understand the investment attributes of, and the market for, ETH.
ETH and the Ethereum Network 15
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ The description of ETH and the Ethereum Network in this 
section was provided by the Sponsor and is based on the Annual 
Report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to the Annual Report, Ethereum, or ETH, is a digital 
asset that is created and transmitted through the operations of the 
peer-to-peer ``Ethereum Network,'' a decentralized network of computers 
that operates on cryptographic protocols. No single entity owns or 
operates the Ethereum Network, the infrastructure of which is 
collectively maintained by a decentralized user base. The Ethereum 
Network allows people to exchange tokens of value, called Ether, which 
are recorded on a public transaction ledger known as a blockchain. ETH 
can be used to pay for goods and services, including computational 
power on the Ethereum network, or it can be converted to fiat 
currencies, such as the U.S. dollar, at rates determined on ``Digital 
Asset Exchanges'' \16\ that trade ETH or in individual end-user-to-end-
user transactions under a barter system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ A ``Digital Asset Market'' is a ``Brokered Market,'' 
``Dealer Market,'' ``Principal-to-Principal Market'' or ``Exchange 
Market,'' as each such term is defined in the Financial Accounting 
Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Master Glossary. 
The ``Digital Asset Exchange Market'' is the global exchange market 
for the trading of ETH, which consists of transactions on electronic 
Digital Asset Exchanges. A ``Digital Asset Exchange'' is an 
electronic marketplace where exchange participants may trade, buy 
and sell ETH based on bid-ask trading. The largest Digital Asset 
Exchanges are online and typically trade on a 24-hour basis, 
publishing transaction price and volume data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Furthermore, the Ethereum Network also allows users to write and 
implement smart contracts--that is, general-purpose code that executes 
on every computer in the network and can instruct the transmission of 
information and value based on a sophisticated set of logical 
conditions. Using smart contracts, users can create markets, store 
registries of debts or promises, represent the ownership of property, 
move funds in accordance with conditional instructions and create 
digital assets other than ETH on the Ethereum Network. Smart contract 
operations are executed on the Ethereum Blockchain in exchange for 
payment of ETH. The Ethereum Network is one of a number of projects 
intended to expand blockchain use beyond just a peer-to-peer money 
system.
    The Ethereum Network went live on July 30, 2015. Unlike other 
digital assets, such as Bitcoin, which are solely created through a 
progressive mining process, 72.0 million ETH were created in connection 
with the launch of the Ethereum Network. At the time of the network 
launch, a non-profit called the Ethereum Foundation was the sole 
organization dedicated to protocol development.
    The Ethereum Network is decentralized in that it does not require 
governmental authorities or financial institution intermediaries to 
create, transmit, or determine the value of ETH. Rather, following the 
initial distribution of ETH, ETH is created, burned, and allocated by 
the Ethereum Network protocol through a process that is currently 
subject to an issuance and burn rate. The value of ETH is determined by 
the supply of and demand for ETH on the Digital Asset Exchanges or in 
private end-user-to-end-user transactions.
    New ETH are created and rewarded to the validators of a block in 
the Ethereum Blockchain for verifying transactions. The Ethereum 
Blockchain is effectively a decentralized database that includes all 
blocks that have been validated, and it is updated to include new 
blocks as they are validated. Each ETH transaction is broadcast to the 
Ethereum Network and, when included in a block,

[[Page 73895]]

recorded in the Ethereum Blockchain. As each new block records 
outstanding ETH transactions, and outstanding transactions are settled 
and validated through such recording, the Ethereum Blockchain 
represents a complete, transparent and unbroken history of all 
transactions of the Ethereum Network.
    Among other things, ETH is used to pay for transaction fees and 
computational services (i.e., smart contracts) on the Ethereum Network; 
users of the Ethereum Network pay for the computational power of the 
machines executing the requested operations with ETH. Requiring payment 
in ETH on the Ethereum Network incentivizes developers to write quality 
applications and increases the efficiency of the Ethereum Network 
because wasteful code costs more, while also ensuring that the Ethereum 
Network remains economically viable by compensating for contributed 
computational resources.
Smart Contracts and Development on the Ethereum Network
    Smart contracts are programs that run on a blockchain that can 
execute automatically when certain conditions are met. Smart contracts 
facilitate the exchange of anything representative of value, such as 
money, information, property, or voting rights. Using smart contracts, 
users can send or receive digital assets, create markets, store 
registries of debts or promises, represent ownership of property or a 
company, move funds in accordance with conditional instructions and 
create new digital assets.
    Development on the Ethereum Network involves building more complex 
tools on top of smart contracts, such as decentralized apps 
(``DApps''); organizations that are autonomous, known as decentralized 
autonomous organizations (``DAOs''); and entirely new decentralized 
networks. For example, a company that distributes charitable donations 
on behalf of users could hold donated funds in smart contracts that are 
paid to charities only if the charity satisfies certain pre-defined 
conditions.
    Moreover, the Ethereum Network has also been used as a platform for 
creating new digital assets and conducting their associated initial 
coin offerings. As of June 30, 2023, a majority of digital assets were 
built on the Ethereum Network, with such assets representing a 
significant amount of the total market value of all digital assets.
    More recently, the Ethereum Network has been used for decentralized 
finance (``DeFi'') or open finance platforms, which seek to democratize 
access to financial services, such as borrowing, lending, custody, 
trading, derivatives and insurance, by removing third-party 
intermediaries. DeFi can allow users to lend and earn interest on their 
digital assets, exchange one digital asset for another and create 
derivative digital assets such as stablecoins, which are digital assets 
pegged to a reserve asset such as fiat currency. Over the course of 
2022, between $20 billion and $98 billion worth of digital assets were 
locked up as collateral on DeFi platforms on the Ethereum Network.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ DeFiLlama, ``Ethereum Total Value Locked,'' https://defillama.com/chain/Ethereum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Ethereum Network and other smart contract 
platforms have been used for creating non-fungible tokens, or ``NFTs.'' 
Unlike digital assets native to smart contract platforms that are 
fungible and enable the payment of fees for smart contract execution, 
NFTs allow for digital ownership of assets that convey certain rights 
to other digital or real-world assets. This new paradigm allows users 
to own rights to other assets through NFTs, which enable users to trade 
them with others on the Ethereum Network. For example, an NFT may 
convey rights to a digital asset that exists in an online game or a 
Dapp, and users can trade their NFT in the Dapp or game, and carry them 
to other digital experiences, creating an entirely new free-market, 
internet-native economy that can be monetized in the physical world.
Overview of the Ethereum Network's Operations
    In order to own, transfer, or use ETH directly on the Ethereum 
Network (as opposed to through an intermediary, such as a custodian), a 
person generally must have internet access to connect to the Ethereum 
Network. ETH transactions may be made directly between end-users 
without the need for a third-party intermediary. To prevent the 
possibility of double-spending ETH, a user must notify the Ethereum 
Network of the transaction by broadcasting the transaction data to its 
network peers. The Ethereum Network provides confirmation against 
double-spending by memorializing every transaction in the Ethereum 
Blockchain, which is publicly accessible and transparent. This 
memorialization and verification against double-spending is 
accomplished through the Ethereum Network validation process, which 
adds ``blocks'' of data, including recent transaction information, to 
the Ethereum Blockchain.
Summary of an ETH Transaction
    Prior to engaging in ETH transactions directly on the Ethereum 
Network, a user generally must first install on its computer or mobile 
device an Ethereum Network software program that will allow the user to 
generate a private and public key pair associated with an ETH address, 
commonly referred to as a ``wallet.'' The Ethereum Network software 
program and the ETH address also enable the user to connect to the 
Ethereum Network and transfer ETH to, and receive ETH from, other 
users.
    Each Ethereum Network address, or wallet, is associated with a 
unique ``public key'' and ``private key'' pair. To receive ETH, the ETH 
recipient must provide its public key to the party initiating the 
transfer. This activity is analogous to a recipient for a transaction 
in U.S. dollars providing a routing address in wire instructions to the 
payor so that cash may be wired to the recipient's account. The payor 
approves the transfer to the address provided by the recipient by 
``signing'' a transaction that consists of the recipient's public key 
with the private key of the address from where the payor is 
transferring the ETH. The recipient, however, does not make public or 
provide to the sender its related private key.
    Neither the recipient nor the sender reveals their private keys in 
a transaction, because the private key authorizes transfer of the funds 
in that address to other users. Therefore, if a user loses his private 
key, the user may permanently lose access to the ETH contained in the 
associated address. Likewise, ETH is irretrievably lost if the private 
key associated with them is deleted and no backup has been made. When 
sending ETH, a user's Ethereum Network software program must validate 
the transaction with the associated private key. In addition, since 
every computation on the Ethereum Network requires processing power, 
there is a transaction fee involved with the transfer that is paid by 
the payor. The resulting digitally validated transaction is sent by the 
user's Ethereum Network software program to the Ethereum Network 
validators to allow transaction confirmation.
    Ethereum Network validators record and confirm transactions when 
they validate and add blocks of information to the Ethereum Blockchain. 
In proof-of-stake, validators compete to be randomly selected to 
validate transactions. When a validator is selected to validate a 
block, it creates that block, which includes data relating to (i) the 
verification of newly submitted

[[Page 73896]]

and accepted transactions and (ii) a reference to the prior block in 
the Ethereum Blockchain to which the new block is being added. The 
validator becomes aware of outstanding, unrecorded transactions through 
the data packet transmission and distribution discussed above.
    Upon the addition of a block included in the Ethereum Blockchain, 
the Ethereum Network software program of both the spending party and 
the receiving party will show confirmation of the transaction on the 
Ethereum Blockchain and reflect an adjustment to the ETH balance in 
each party's Ethereum Network public key, completing the ETH 
transaction. Once a transaction is confirmed on the Ethereum 
Blockchain, it is irreversible.
    Some ETH transactions are conducted ``off-blockchain'' and are 
therefore not recorded in the Ethereum Blockchain. Some ``off-
blockchain transactions'' involve the transfer of control over, or 
ownership of, a specific digital wallet holding ETH or the reallocation 
of ownership of certain ETH in a pooled-ownership digital wallet, such 
as a digital wallet owned by a Digital Asset Exchange. In contrast to 
on-blockchain transactions, which are publicly recorded on the Ethereum 
Blockchain, information and data regarding off-blockchain transactions 
are generally not publicly available. Therefore, off-blockchain 
transactions are not truly ETH transactions in that they do not involve 
the transfer of transaction data on the Ethereum Network and do not 
reflect a movement of ETH between addresses recorded in the Ethereum 
Blockchain. For these reasons, off-blockchain transactions are subject 
to risks, as any such transfer of ETH ownership is not protected by the 
protocol behind the Ethereum Network or recorded in, and validated 
through, the blockchain mechanism.
Creation of New ETH
Initial Creation of ETH
    Unlike other digital assets such as Bitcoin, which are solely 
created through a progressive mining process, 72.0 million ETH were 
created in connection with the launch of the Ethereum Network. The 
initial 72.0 million ETH were distributed as follows:
    Initial Distribution: 60.0 million ETH, or 83.33% of the supply, 
were sold to the public in a crowd sale conducted between July and 
August 2014 that raised approximately $18 million.
    Ethereum Foundation: 6.0 million ETH, or 8.33% of the supply, were 
distributed to the Ethereum Foundation for operational costs.
    Ethereum Developers: 3.0 million ETH, or 4.17% of the supply, were 
distributed to developers who contributed to the Ethereum Network.
    Developer Purchase Program: 3.0 million ETH, or 4.17% of the 
supply, were distributed to members of the Ethereum Foundation to 
purchase at the initial crowd sale price.
    Following the launch of the Ethereum Network, ETH supply initially 
increased through a progressive mining process. Following the 
introduction of EIP-1559, described below, ETH supply and issuance rate 
varies based on factors such as recent use of the network.
Proof-of-Work Mining Process
    Prior to September 2022, Ethereum operated using a proof-of-work 
consensus mechanism. Under proof-of-work, in order to incentivize those 
who incurred the computational costs of securing the network by 
validating transactions, there was a reward given to the computer that 
was able to create the latest block on the chain. Every 12 seconds, on 
average, a new block was added to the Ethereum Blockchain with the 
latest transactions processed by the network, and the computer that 
generated this block was awarded a variable amount of ETH, depending on 
use of the network at the time. In certain mining scenarios, referred 
to as an uncle/aunt reward, ETH was sometimes sent to another miner if 
they were also able to find a solution, but their block was not 
included. Due to the nature of the algorithm for block generation, this 
process (generating a ``proof-of-work'') was guaranteed to be random. 
The process by which a digital asset was ``mined'' resulted in new 
blocks being added to such digital asset's blockchain and new digital 
assets being issued to the miners. Prior to the Merge upgrade, 
described below, computers on the Ethereum Network engaged in a set of 
prescribed complex mathematical calculations in order to add a block to 
the Ethereum Blockchain and thereby confirm ETH transactions included 
in that block's data.
Proof-of-Stake Process
    In the second half of 2020, the Ethereum Network began the first of 
several stages of an upgrade that was initially known as ``Ethereum 
2.0'' and eventually became known as the ``Merge'' to transition the 
Ethereum Network from a proof-of-work consensus mechanism to a proof-
of-stake consensus mechanism. The Merge was completed on September 15, 
2022, and the Ethereum Network has operated on a proof-of-stake model 
since such time.
    Unlike proof-of-work, in which miners expend computational 
resources to compete to validate transactions and are rewarded coins in 
proportion to the amount of computational resources expended, in proof-
of-stake, miners (sometimes called validators) risk or ``stake'' coins 
to compete to be randomly selected to validate transactions and are 
rewarded coins in proportion to the amount of coins staked. Any 
malicious activity, such as validating multiple blocks, disagreeing 
with the eventual consensus, or otherwise violating protocol rules, 
results in the forfeiture or ``slashing'' of a portion of the staked 
coins. Proof-of-stake is viewed as more energy efficient and scalable 
than proof-of-work and is sometimes referred to as ``virtual mining.'' 
Every 12 seconds, approximately, a new block is added to the Ethereum 
Blockchain with the latest transactions processed by the network, and 
the validator that generated this block is awarded ETH.
Limits on ETH Supply
    The rate at which new ETH are issued and put into circulation is 
expected to vary. Following the Merge, approximately 1,700 ETH are 
issued per day, though the issuance rate varies based on the number of 
validators on the network. In addition, the issuance of new ETH could 
be partially or completely offset by the burn mechanism introduced by 
the EIP-1559 modification, under which ETH are removed from supply at a 
rate that varies with network usage. On occasion, the ETH supply has 
been deflationary over a 24-hour period as a result of the burn 
mechanism. The attributes of the new consensus algorithm are subject to 
change, but in sum, the new consensus algorithm and related 
modifications reduced total new ETH issuances and could turn the ETH 
supply deflationary over the long term.
    As of June 30, 2023, approximately 120 million ETH were 
outstanding.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ CoinMarketCap, ``Ethereum,'' https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/ethereum/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Modifications to the ETH Protocol
    The Ethereum Network is an open source project with no official 
developer or group of developers that controls it. However, 
historically the Ethereum Network's development has been overseen by 
the Ethereum Foundation and other core developers. The Ethereum 
Foundation and core developers are able to access and alter the 
Ethereum Network source code and,

[[Page 73897]]

as a result, they are responsible for quasi-official releases of 
updates and other changes to the Ethereum Network's source code.
    For example, in 2019, the Ethereum Network completed a network 
upgrade called Metropolis that was designed to enhance the usability of 
the Ethereum Network and was introduced in two stages. The first stage, 
called Byzantium, was implemented in October 2017. The purpose of 
Byzantium was to increase the network's privacy, security, and 
scalability and reduce the block reward from 5.0 ETH to 3.0 ETH. The 
second stage, called Constantinople, was implemented in February 2019, 
along with another upgrade, called St. Petersburg. Another network 
upgrade, called Istanbul, was implemented in December 2019. The purpose 
of Istanbul was to make the network more resistant to denial of service 
attacks, enable greater ETH and Zcash interoperability as well as other 
Equihash-based proof-of-work digital assets, and to increase the 
scalability and performance for solutions on zero-knowledge privacy 
technology like SNARKs and STARKs. The purpose of these upgrades was to 
prepare the Ethereum Network for the introduction of a proof-of-stake 
algorithm and reduce the block reward from 3.0 ETH to 2.0 ETH. In the 
second half of 2020, the Ethereum Network began the first of several 
stages of an upgrade culminating in the Merge. The Merge amended the 
Ethereum Network's consensus mechanism to include proof-of-stake. 
Forthcoming upgrades will include sharding. The purpose of sharding is 
to increase scalability of a database, such as a blockchain, by 
splitting the data processing responsibility among many nodes, allowing 
for parallel processing and validation of transactions. This contrasts 
with the existing Ethereum Blockchain, which requires each node to 
process and validate every transaction.
    In 2021, the Ethereum network implemented the EIP-1559 upgrade. 
EIP-1559 changed the methodology used to calculate the fees paid to 
miners (now validators). This new methodology splits fees into two 
components: a base cost and priority fee. The base cost is now removed 
from circulation, or ``burnt'', and the priority fee is paid to 
validators. EIP-1559 has reduced the total net issuance of ETH fees to 
validators. The release of updates to the Ethereum Network's source 
code does not guarantee that the updates will be automatically adopted. 
Users and validators must accept any changes made to the Ethereum 
source code by downloading the proposed modification of the Ethereum 
Network's source code. A modification of the Ethereum Network's source 
code is only effective with respect to the Ethereum users and 
validators that download it. If a modification is accepted only by a 
percentage of users and validators, a division in the Ethereum Network 
will occur such that one network will run the pre-modification source 
code and the other network will run the modified source code. Such a 
division is known as a ``fork.'' Consequently, as a practical matter, a 
modification to the source code becomes part of the Ethereum Network 
only if accepted by participants collectively having a majority of the 
validation power on the Ethereum Network.
    Core development of the Ethereum source code has increasingly 
focused on modifications of the Ethereum protocol to increase speed and 
scalability and also allow for financial and non-financial next 
generation uses. The Trust's activities will not directly relate to 
such projects, though such projects may utilize ETH as tokens for the 
facilitation of their non-financial uses, thereby potentially 
increasing demand for ETH and the utility of the Ethereum Network as a 
whole. Conversely, projects that operate and are built within the 
Ethereum Blockchain may increase the data flow on the Ethereum Network 
and could either ``bloat'' the size of the Ethereum Blockchain or slow 
confirmation times.
Custody of the Trust's ETH
    Digital assets and digital asset transactions are recorded and 
validated on blockchains, the public transaction ledgers of a digital 
asset network. Each digital asset blockchain serves as a record of 
ownership for all of the units of such digital asset, even in the case 
of certain privacy-focused digital assets, where the transactions 
themselves are not publicly viewable. All digital assets recorded on a 
blockchain are associated with a public blockchain address, also 
referred to as a digital wallet. Digital assets held at a particular 
public blockchain address may be accessed and transferred using a 
corresponding private key.
Key Generation
    Public addresses and their corresponding private keys are generated 
by the Custodian in secret key generation ceremonies at secure 
locations inside faraday cages, which are enclosures used to block 
electromagnetic fields and mitigate attacks. The Custodian uses quantum 
random number generators to generate the public and private key pairs.
    Once generated, private keys are encrypted, separated into 
``shards,'' and then further encrypted. After the key generation 
ceremony, all materials used to generate private keys, including 
computers, are destroyed. All key generation ceremonies are performed 
offline. No party other than the Custodian has access to the private 
key shards of the Trust.
Key Storage
    Private key shards are distributed geographically in secure vaults 
around the world, including in the United States. The locations of the 
secure vaults may change regularly and are kept confidential by the 
Custodian for security purposes.
    The Digital Asset Account \19\ uses offline storage, or ``cold 
storage,'' mechanisms to secure the Trust's private keys. The term cold 
storage refers to a safeguarding method by which the private keys 
corresponding to digital assets are disconnected and/or deleted 
entirely from the internet. Cold storage of private keys may involve 
keeping such keys on a non-networked (or ``airgapped'') computer or 
electronic device or storing the private keys on a storage device (for 
example, a USB thumb drive) or printed medium (for example, papyrus, 
paper, or a metallic object). A digital wallet may receive deposits of 
digital assets but may not send digital assets without use of the 
digital assets' corresponding private keys. In order to send digital 
assets from a digital wallet in which the private keys are kept in cold 
storage, either the private keys must be retrieved from cold storage 
and entered into an online, or ``hot,'' digital asset software program 
to sign the transaction, or the unsigned transaction must be 
transferred to the cold server in which the private keys are held for 
signature by the private keys and then transferred back to the online 
digital asset software program. At that point, the user of the digital 
wallet can transfer its digital assets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ The Digital Asset Account is a segregated custody account 
controlled and secured by the Custodian to store private keys, which 
allows for the transfer of ownership or control of the Trust's ETH 
on the Trust's behalf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Security Procedures
    The Custodian is the custodian of the Trust's private keys in 
accordance with the terms and provisions of the Custodian Agreement. 
Transfers from the Digital Asset Account require certain security 
procedures, including, but not limited to, multiple encrypted private 
key shards, usernames, passwords and 2-step verification. Multiple 
private key shards held by the

[[Page 73898]]

Custodian must be combined to reconstitute the private key to sign any 
transaction in order to transfer the Trust's assets. Private key shards 
are distributed geographically in secure vaults around the world, 
including in the United States.
    As a result, if any one secure vault is ever compromised, this 
event will have no impact on the ability of the Trust to access its 
assets, other than a possible delay in operations, while one or more of 
the other secure vaults is used instead. These security procedures are 
intended to remove single points of failure in the protection of the 
Trust's assets.
    Transfers of ETH to the Digital Asset Account will be available to 
the Trust once processed on the Blockchain.
    Subject to obtaining regulatory approval to operate a redemption 
program and authorization of the Sponsor, the process of accessing and 
withdrawing ETH from the Trust to redeem a Unit by an Authorized 
Participant will follow the same general procedure as transferring ETH 
to the Trust to create a Unit by an Authorized Participant, only in 
reverse.
Digital Asset Holdings
    According to the Annual Report, the Trust's assets consist solely 
of ETH, Incidental Rights, IR Virtual Currency, proceeds from the sale 
of ETH, Incidental Rights, and IR Virtual Currency pending use of such 
cash for payment of Additional Trust Expenses or distribution to the 
shareholders, and any rights of the Trust pursuant to any agreements, 
other than the Trust Agreement, to which the Trust is a party. Each 
Share represents a proportional interest, based on the total number of 
Shares outstanding, in each of the Trust's assets as determined in the 
case of ETH by reference to the Index Price, less the Trust's expenses 
and other liabilities (which include accrued but unpaid fees and 
expenses). The Sponsor expects that the market price of the Shares will 
fluctuate over time in response to the market prices of ETH. In 
addition, because the Shares reflect the estimated accrued but unpaid 
expenses of the Trust, the number of ETH represented by a Share will 
gradually decrease over time as the Trust's ETH is used to pay the 
Trust's expenses. The Trust does not expect to take any Incidental 
Rights or IR Virtual Currency it may hold into account for purposes of 
determining the Trust's Digital Asset Holdings or the Digital Asset 
Holdings per Share.
    The Sponsor will evaluate the ETH held by the Trust and determine 
the Digital Asset Holdings of the Trust in accordance with the relevant 
provisions of the Trust Documents. The following is a description of 
the material terms of the Trust Documents as they relate to valuation 
of the Trust's ETH and the Digital Asset Holdings calculations.
    On each business day at 4:00 p.m., New York time, or as soon 
thereafter as practicable (the ``Evaluation Time''), the Sponsor will 
evaluate the ETH held by the Trust and calculate and publish the 
Digital Asset Holdings of the Trust. To calculate the Digital Asset 
Holdings, the Sponsor will:
    1. Determine the Index Price as of such business day.
    2. Multiply the Index Price by the Trust's aggregate number of ETH 
owned by the Trust as of 4:00 p.m., New York time, on the immediately 
preceding day, less the aggregate number of ETH payable as the accrued 
and unpaid Sponsor's Fee as of 4:00 p.m., New York time, on the 
immediately preceding day.
    3. Add the U.S. dollar value of ETH, calculated using the Index 
Price, receivable under pending creation orders, if any, determined by 
multiplying the number of the Baskets represented by such creation 
orders by the Basket Amount and then multiplying such product by the 
Index Price.
    4. Subtract the U.S. dollar amount of accrued and unpaid Additional 
Trust Expenses, if any.
    5. Subtract the U.S. dollar value of the ETH, calculated using the 
Index Price, to be distributed under pending redemption orders, if any, 
determined by multiplying the number of Baskets to be redeemed 
represented by such redemption orders by the Basket Amount and then 
multiplying such product by the Index Price (the amount derived from 
steps 1 through 5 above, the ``Digital Asset Holdings Fee Basis 
Amount'').
    6. Subtract the U.S. dollar amount of the Sponsor's Fee that 
accrues for such business day, as calculated based on the Digital Asset 
Holdings Fee Basis Amount for such business day.
    In the event that the Sponsor determines that the primary 
methodology used to determine the Index Price is not an appropriate 
basis for valuation of the Trust's ETH, the Sponsor will utilize the 
cascading set of rules as described in ``Trust Valuation of ETH'' 
below. In addition, in the event that the Trust holds any Incidental 
Rights and/or IR Virtual Currency, the Sponsor may, at its discretion, 
include the value of such Incidental Rights and/or IR Virtual Currency 
in the determination of the Digital Asset Holdings, provided that the 
Sponsor has determined in good faith a method for assigning an 
objective value to such Incidental Rights and/or IR Virtual Currency. 
At this time, the Trust does not expect to take any Incidental Rights 
or IR Virtual Currency it may hold into account for the purposes of 
determining the Digital Asset Holdings or the Digital Asset Holdings 
per Share.
ETH Value
Digital Asset Exchange Valuation
    According to the Annual Report, the value of ETH is determined by 
the value that various market participants place on ETH through their 
transactions. The most common means of determining the value of an ETH 
is by surveying one or more Digital Asset Exchanges where ETH is traded 
publicly (e.g., Coinbase Pro, Kraken, and LMAX Digital). Additionally, 
there are over-the-counter dealers or market makers that transact in 
ETH.
Digital Asset Exchange Public Market Data
    On each online Digital Asset Exchange, ETH is traded with publicly 
disclosed valuations for each executed trade, measured by one or more 
fiat currencies such as the U.S. dollar or euro. Over-the-counter 
dealers or market makers do not typically disclose their trade data.
    As of June 30, 2023, the Digital Asset Exchanges included in the 
Index are Coinbase Pro, Kraken, and LMAX Digital. As further described 
below, the Sponsor and the Trust reasonably believe each of these 
Digital Asset Exchanges are in material compliance with applicable U.S. 
federal and state licensing requirements and maintain practices and 
policies designed to comply with know-your-customer (``KYC''), anti-
money-laundering (``AML'') regulations.
    Coinbase Pro: A U.S.-based exchange registered as a money services 
business (``MSB'') with the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial 
Crimes Enforcement Network (``FinCEN'') and licensed as a virtual 
currency business under the New York State Department of Financial 
Services (``NYDFS'') BitLicense program, as well as money transmitter 
in various U.S. states.
    Kraken: A U.S.-based exchange registered as an MSB with FinCEN and 
licensed as money transmitter in various U.S. states. Kraken does not 
hold a BitLicense.
    LMAX Digital: A U.K.-based exchange registered as a broker with the 
Financial Conduct Authority. LMAX Digital does not hold a BitLicense.
    Currently, there are several Digital Asset Exchanges operating 
worldwide,

[[Page 73899]]

and online Digital Asset Exchanges represent a substantial percentage 
of ETH buying and selling activity and provide the most data with 
respect to prevailing valuations of ETH. These exchanges include 
established exchanges such as exchanges included in the Index, which 
provide a number of options for buying and selling ETH. The below table 
reflects the trading volume in ETH and market share \20\ of the ETH-
U.S. dollar trading pair of each of the Digital Asset Exchanges 
included in the Index as of June 30, 2023,\21\ using data reported by 
the Index Provider from December 14, 2017 to June 30, 2023:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ Market share is calculated using trading volume data (in 
ETH) provided by the Index Provider for certain Digital Asset 
Exchanges, including Coinbase Pro, Kraken, and LMAX Digital, as well 
as certain other large U.S.-dollar denominated Digital Asset 
Exchanges that are not included in the Index as of June 30, 2023, 
including Bitstamp, Binance.US (data included from April 1, 2020), 
Bitfinex, Bittrex (data included from July 31, 2018), Cboe Digital 
(data included from October 1, 2020), FTX.US (data included from 
July 1, 2021 through November 10, 2022), Gemini, HitBTC (data 
included from June 13, 2019 through March 31, 2020), OKCoin (data 
included from December 25, 2018 through December 31, 2022), and 
itBit (data included from December 27, 2018).
    \21\ On January 19, 2020, the Index Provider removed itBit due 
to a lack of trading volume and added LMAX Digital to the Index 
based on the exchange meeting the liquidity thresholds as part of 
its scheduled quarterly review. Effective July 23, 2022, the Index 
Provider removed Bitstamp from the Index due to the exchange's 
failure to meet the minimum liquidity requirement, and added FTX.US 
as a Constituent Exchange based on its satisfaction of the minimum 
liquidity requirement as part of its scheduled quarterly review. 
Effective November 10, 2022, the Index Provider removed FTX.US from 
the Index due to FTX.US's announcement that trading on the exchange 
may be halted, which would impact FTX.US's ability to reliably 
publish trade prices and volumes on a real-time basis through APIs, 
and did not add any Constituent Exchanges as part of its review. 
Effective January 28, 2023, the Index Provider added Binance.US to 
the Index based on the exchange meeting the minimum liquidity 
requirement, and did not remove any Constituent Exchanges as part of 
its quarterly review. On June 17, 2023, the Index Provider removed 
Binance.US from the Index, due to Binance.US's announcement that the 
exchange was suspending U.S. dollar deposits and withdrawals and 
planned to delist its U.S. dollar trading pairs, and did not add any 
Constituent Exchanges as part of its review.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Digital asset exchanges included in the                   Market share
        index as of June 30, 2023          Volume (ETH)         (%)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coinbase Pro............................     399,687,249           34.61
Kraken..................................     132,211,166           11.45
LMAX Digital............................      65,848,432            5.70
                                         -------------------------------
    Total ETH-U.S. dollar trading pair..     597,746,846           51.76
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The domicile, regulation, and legal compliance of the Digital Asset 
Exchanges included in the Index varies. Information regarding each 
Digital Asset Exchange may be found, where available, on the websites 
for such Digital Asset Exchanges, among other places.
The Index and the Index Price
    The Index is a U.S. dollar-denominated composite reference rate for 
the price of ETH. The Index is designed to (i) mitigate the effects of 
fraud, manipulation and other anomalous trading activity from impacting 
the ETH reference rate, (ii) provide a real-time, volume-weighted fair 
value of ETH and (iii) appropriately handle and adjust for non-market 
related events.
    The Index Price is determined by the Index Provider through a 
process in which trade data is cleansed and compiled in such a manner 
as to algorithmically reduce the impact of anomalistic or manipulative 
trading. This is accomplished by adjusting the weight of each data 
input based on price deviation relative to the observable set, as well 
as recent and long-term trading volume at each venue relative to the 
observable set.
Constituent Exchange Selection
    According to the Annual Report, the Digital Asset Exchanges that 
are included in the Index are selected by the Index Provider utilizing 
a methodology that is guided by the International Organization of 
Securities Commissions (``IOSCO'') principles for financial benchmarks. 
For an exchange to become a Digital Asset Exchange included in the 
Index (a ``Constituent Exchange''), it must satisfy the criteria listed 
below (the ``Inclusion Criteria''):
     Sufficient USD liquidity relative to the size of the 
listed assets;
     No evidence in the past 12 months of trading restrictions 
on individuals or entities that would otherwise meet the exchange's 
eligibility requirements to trade;
     No evidence in the past 12 months of undisclosed 
restrictions on deposits or withdrawals from user accounts;
     Real-time price discovery;
     Limited or no capital controls;
     Transparent ownership including a publicly-owned ownership 
entity;
     Publicly available language and policies addressing legal 
and regulatory compliance in the US, including KYC (Know Your 
Customer), AML (Anti-Money Laundering) and other policies designed to 
comply with relevant regulations that might apply to it;
     Be a U.S.-domiciled exchange or a non-U.S. domiciled 
exchange that is able to service U.S. investors;
     Offer programmatic spot trading of the trading \22\ pair; 
and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ Exchanges with programmatic trading offer traders an 
application programming interface that permits trading by sending 
programmed commands to the exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Reliably publish trade prices and volumes on a real-time 
basis through Rest and Websocket APIs.
    A Digital Asset Exchange is removed as a Constituent Exchanges when 
it no longer satisfies the Inclusion Criteria. The Index Provider does 
not currently include data from over-the-counter markets or derivatives 
platforms among the Constituent Exchanges. According to the Annual 
Report, over-the-counter data is not currently included because of the 
potential for trades to include a significant premium or discount paid 
for larger liquidity, which creates an uneven comparison relative to 
more active markets. There is also a higher potential for over-the-
counter transactions to not be arms-length, and thus not be 
representative of a true market price. ETH derivative markets are also 
not currently included as the markets remain relatively thin. The Index 
Provider will consider IOSCO principles for financial benchmarks and 
the management of trading venues of ETH derivatives and the 
aforementioned Inclusion Criteria when considering inclusion of over-
the-counter or derivative platform data in the future.
    The Index Provider and the Sponsor have entered into an index 
license agreement, dated as of February 1, 2022 (as amended, the 
``Index License Agreement''), governing the Sponsor's

[[Page 73900]]

use of the Index Price.\23\ Pursuant to the terms of the Index License 
Agreement, the Index Provider may adjust the calculation methodology 
for the Index Price without notice to, or consent of, the Trust or its 
shareholders. The Index Provider may decide to change the calculation 
methodology to maintain the integrity of the Index Price calculation 
should it identify or become aware of previously unknown variables or 
issues with the existing methodology that it believes could materially 
impact its performance and/or reliability. The Index Provider has sole 
discretion over the determination of Index Price and may change the 
methodologies for determining the Index Price from time to time. 
Shareholders will be notified of any material changes to the 
calculation methodology or the Index Price in the Trust's current 
reports and will be notified of all other changes that the Sponsor 
considers significant in the Trust's periodic or current reports. The 
Trust will determine the materiality of any changes to the Index Price 
on a case-by-case basis, in consultation with external counsel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ Upon entering into the Index License Agreement, the Sponsor 
and the Index Provider terminated the license agreement between the 
parties dated as of February 28, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Index Provider may change the trading venues that are used to 
calculate the Index or otherwise change the way in which the Index is 
calculated at any time. For example, the Index Provider has scheduled 
quarterly reviews in which it may add or remove Constituent Exchanges 
that satisfy or fail the Inclusion Criteria. The Index Provider does 
not have any obligation to consider the interests of the Sponsor, the 
Trust, the shareholders, or anyone else in connection with such 
changes. While the Index Provider is not required to publicize or 
explain the changes or to alert the Sponsor to such changes, it has 
historically notified the Trust of any material changes to the 
Constituent Exchanges, including any additions or removals of the 
Constituent Exchanges, in addition to issuing press releases in 
connection with the same. The Sponsor will notify investors of any such 
material event by filing a current report on Form 8-K. Although the 
Index methodology is designed to operate without any manual 
intervention, rare events would justify manual intervention. 
Intervention of this kind would be in response to non-market-related 
events, such as the halting of deposits or withdrawals of funds on a 
Digital Asset Exchange, the unannounced closure of operations on a 
Digital Asset Exchange, insolvency or the compromise of user funds. In 
the event that such an intervention is necessary, the Index Provider 
would issue a public announcement through its website, API and other 
established communication channels with its clients.
Determination of the Index Price
    The Index applies an algorithm to the price of ETH on the 
Constituent Exchanges calculated on a per second basis over a 24-hour 
period. The Index's algorithm is expected to reflect a four-pronged 
methodology to calculate the Index Price from the Constituent 
Exchanges:
     Volume Weighting: Constituent Exchanges with greater 
liquidity receive a higher weighting in the Index, increasing the 
ability to execute against (i.e., replicate) the Index in the 
underlying spot markets.
     Price-Variance Weighting: The Index Price reflects data 
points that are discretely weighted in proportion to their variance 
from the rest of the Constituent Exchanges. As the price at a 
particular exchange diverges from the prices at the rest of the 
Constituent Exchanges, its weight in the Index Price consequently 
decreases.
     Inactivity Adjustment: The Index Price algorithm penalizes 
stale activity from any given Constituent Exchange. When a Constituent 
Exchange does not have recent trading data, its weighting in the Index 
Price is gradually reduced until it is de-weighted entirely. Similarly, 
once trading activity at a Constituent Exchange resumes, the 
corresponding weighting for that Constituent Exchange is gradually 
increased until it reaches the appropriate level.
     Manipulation Resistance: In order to mitigate the effects 
of wash trading and order book spoofing, the Index only includes 
executed trades in its calculation. Additionally, the Index only 
includes Constituent Exchanges that charge trading fees to its users in 
order to attach a real, quantifiable cost to any manipulation attempts.
    The Index Provider re-evaluates the weighting algorithm on a 
periodic basis, but maintains discretion to change the way in which an 
Index Price is calculated based on its periodic review or in extreme 
circumstances. The exact methodology to calculate the Index Price is 
not publicly available. Still, the Index is designed to limit exposure 
to trading or price distortion of any individual Digital Asset Exchange 
that experiences periods of unusual activity or limited liquidity by 
discounting, in real-time, anomalous price movements at individual 
Digital Asset Exchanges.
    The Sponsor believes the Index Provider's selection process for 
Constituent Exchanges as well as the methodology of the Index Price's 
algorithm provides a more accurate picture of ETH price movements than 
a simple average of Digital Asset Exchange spot prices, and that the 
weighting of ETH prices on the Constituent Exchanges limits the 
inclusion of data that is influenced by temporary price dislocations 
that may result from technical problems, limited liquidity or 
fraudulent activity elsewhere in the ETH spot market. By referencing 
multiple trading venues and weighting them based on trade activity, the 
Sponsor believes that the impact of any potential fraud, manipulation 
or anomalous trading activity occurring on any single venue is reduced.
    If the Index Price becomes unavailable, or if the Sponsor 
determines in good faith that such Index Price does not reflect an 
accurate price for ETH, then the Sponsor will, on a best efforts basis, 
contact the Index Provider to obtain the Index Price directly from the 
Index Provider. If after such contact such Index Price remains 
unavailable or the Sponsor continues to believe in good faith that such 
Index Price does not reflect an accurate price for the relevant digital 
asset, then the Sponsor will employ a cascading set of rules to 
determine the Index Price, as described below in ``Determination of the 
Index Price When Index Prices are Unavailable.''
    The Trust values its ETH for operational purposes by reference to 
the Index Price. The Index Price is the value of an ETH as represented 
by the Index, calculated at 4:00 p.m., New York time, on each business 
day.
Illustrative Example
    For the purposes of illustration, outlined below are examples of 
how the attributes that impact weighting and adjustments in the 
aforementioned methodology may be utilized to generate the Index Price 
for a digital asset. In this example, the Constituent Exchanges for the 
Index Price for a digital asset are Coinbase Pro, Kraken, LMAX Digital, 
and Bitstamp.
    The Index Price algorithm, as described above, accounts for 
manipulation at the outset by only including data from executed trades 
on Constituent Exchanges that charge trading fees. Then, the below-
listed elements may impact the weighting of the Constituent Exchanges 
on the Index price as follows:
     Volume Weighting: Each Constituent Exchange will be 
weighted to appropriately reflect the trading

[[Page 73901]]

volume share of the Constituent Exchange relative to all the 
Constituent Exchanges during this same period. For example, an average 
hourly weighting of 67.06%, 14.57%, 11.88%, and 6.49% for Coinbase Pro, 
LMAX Digital, Kraken, and Bitstamp, respectively, would represent each 
Constituent Exchange's share of trading volume during the same period.
     Inactivity Adjustment: Assume that a Constituent Exchange 
represented a 14% weighting on the Index Price of a digital asset, 
which is based on the per-second calculations of its trading volume and 
price-variance relative to the cohort of Constituent Exchanges included 
in such Index, and then went offline for approximately two hours. The 
index algorithm would automatically recognize inactivity and start de-
weighting the Constituent Exchange at the 3-minute mark and continue to 
do so over a 7-minute period until its influence was effectively zero, 
10-minutes after becoming inactive. As soon as trading activity resumed 
at the Constituent Exchange, the index algorithm would re-weight it to 
the appropriate weighting based on trading volume and price-variance 
relative to the cohort of Constituent Exchanges included in the Index. 
Due to the period of inactivity, it would re-weight the Constituent 
Exchange activity to a weight lower than its original weighting--for 
example, to 12%.
     Price-Variance Weighting: Assume that for a one-hour 
period, the digital asset's execution prices on one Constituent 
Exchange were trading more than 7% higher than the average execution 
prices on another Constituent Exchange. The algorithm will 
automatically detect the anomaly and reduce that specific Constituent 
Exchange's weighting to 0% for that one-hour period, ensuring a 
reliable spot reference unaffected by the localized event.
Determination of the Index Price When Index Prices Are Unavailable
    The Sponsor uses the following cascading set of rules to calculate 
the Index Price.\24\ For the avoidance of doubt, the Sponsor will 
employ the below rules sequentially and in the order as presented 
below, should one or more specific rule(s) fail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ The Sponsor updated these rules on January 11, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    1. Index Price = The price set by the Index as of 4:00 p.m., New 
York time, on the valuation date. If the Index becomes unavailable, or 
if the Sponsor determines in good faith that the Index does not reflect 
an accurate price, then the Sponsor will, on a best efforts basis, 
contact the Index Provider to obtain the Index Price directly from the 
Index Provider. If after such contact the Index remains unavailable or 
the Sponsor continues to believe in good faith that the Index does not 
reflect an accurate price, then the Sponsor will employ the next rule 
to determine the Index Price. There are no predefined criteria to make 
a good faith assessment and it will be made by the Sponsor in its sole 
discretion.
    2. Index Price = The price set by Coin Metrics Real-Time Rate (the 
``Secondary Index'') as of 4:00 p.m., New York time, on the valuation 
date (the ``Secondary Index Price''). The Secondary Index Price is a 
real-time reference rate price, calculated using trade data from 
constituent markets selected by Coin Metrics (the ``Secondary Index 
Provider''). The Secondary Index Price is calculated by applying 
weighted-median techniques to such trade data where half the weight is 
derived from the trading volume on each constituent market and half is 
derived from inverse price variance, where a constituent market with 
high price variance as a result of outliers or market anomalies 
compared to other constituent markets is assigned a smaller weight. If 
the Secondary Index becomes unavailable, or if the Sponsor determines 
in good faith that the Secondary Index does not reflect an accurate 
price, then the Sponsor will, on a best efforts basis, contact the 
Secondary Index Provider to obtain the Secondary Index Price directly 
from the Secondary Index Provider. If after such contact the Secondary 
Index remains unavailable or the Sponsor continues to believe in good 
faith that the Secondary Index does not reflect an accurate price, then 
the Sponsor will employ the next rule to determine the Index Price. 
There are no predefined criteria to make a good faith assessment and it 
will be made by the Sponsor in its sole discretion.
    3. Index Price = The price set by the Trust's principal market (the 
``Tertiary Pricing Option'') as of 4:00 p.m., New York time, on the 
valuation date. The Tertiary Pricing Option is a spot price derived 
from the principal market's public data feed that is believed to be 
consistently publishing pricing information as of 4:00 p.m., New York 
time, and is provided to the Sponsor via an application programming 
interface. If the Tertiary Pricing Option becomes unavailable, or if 
the Sponsor determines in good faith that the Tertiary Pricing Option 
does not reflect an accurate price, then the Sponsor will, on a best 
efforts basis, contact the Tertiary Pricing Provider to obtain the 
Tertiary Pricing Option directly from the Tertiary Pricing Provider. If 
after such contact the Tertiary Pricing Option remains unavailable 
after such contact or the Sponsor continues to believe in good faith 
that the Tertiary Pricing Option does not reflect an accurate price, 
then the Sponsor will employ the next rule to determine the Index 
Price. There are no predefined criteria to make a good faith assessment 
and it will be made by the Sponsor in its sole discretion.
    4. Index Price = The Sponsor will use its best judgment to 
determine a good faith estimate of the Index Price. There are no 
predefined criteria to make a good faith assessment and it will be made 
by the Sponsor in its sole discretion.
    In the event of a fork, the Index Provider may calculate the Index 
Price based on a digital asset that the Sponsor does not believe to be 
the appropriate asset that is held by the Trust.\25\ In this

[[Page 73902]]

event, the Sponsor has full discretion to use a different index 
provider or calculate the Index Price itself using its best judgment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ According to the Annual Report, when a modification is 
introduced and a substantial majority of users and miners consent to 
the modification, the change is implemented and the network remains 
uninterrupted. However, if less than a substantial majority of users 
and miners consent to the proposed modification, and the 
modification is not compatible with the software prior to its 
modification, the consequence would be what is known as a ``hard 
fork'' of the Ethereum Network, with one group running the pre-
modified software and the other running the modified software. The 
effect of such a fork would be the existence of two versions of ETH 
running in parallel, yet lacking interchangeability. For example, in 
July 2016, Ethereum ``forked'' into Ethereum and a new digital 
asset, Ethereum Classic, as a result of the Ethereum network 
community's response to a significant security breach in which an 
anonymous hacker exploited a smart contract running on the Ethereum 
network to syphon approximately $60 million of ETH held by the DAO, 
a distributed autonomous organization, into a segregated account. In 
response to the hack, most participants in the Ethereum community 
elected to adopt a ``fork'' that effectively reversed the hack. 
However, a minority of users continued to develop the original 
blockchain, with the digital asset on that blockchain now referred 
to as Ethereum Classic, or ETC. ETC now trades on several Digital 
Asset Exchanges. In the event of a hard fork of the Ethereum 
Network, the Sponsor will, if permitted by the terms of the Trust 
Agreement, use its discretion to determine, in good faith, which 
peer-to-peer network, among a group of incompatible forks of the 
Ethereum Network, is generally accepted as the Ethereum Network and 
should therefore be considered the appropriate network for the 
Trust's purposes. The Sponsor will base its determination on a 
variety of then relevant factors, including, but not limited to, the 
Sponsor's beliefs regarding expectations of the core developers of 
ETH, users, services, businesses, miners, and other constituencies, 
as well as the actual continued acceptance of, mining power on, and 
community engagement with, the Ethereum Network. There is no 
guarantee that the Sponsor will choose the digital asset that is 
ultimately the most valuable fork, and the Sponsor's decision may 
adversely affect the value of the Shares as a result. The Sponsor 
may also disagree with shareholders, security vendors, and the Index 
Provider on what is generally accepted as ETH and should therefore 
be considered ``ETH'' for the Trust's purposes, which may also 
adversely affect the value of the Shares as a result.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Sponsor may, in its sole discretion, select a different index 
provider, select a different index price provided by the Index 
Provider, calculate the Index Price by using the cascading set of rules 
set forth above, or change the cascading set of rules set forth above 
at any time.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ The Sponsor will provide notice of any such changes in the 
Trust's periodic or current reports and, where applicable, will file 
a proposed rule change with the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Impact of the Approval of ETH Futures ETFs on Spot ETH ETPs Like 
the Trust
    On October 2, 2023, the date of this filing, the first ETH-based 
exchange-traded funds (``ETFs'') were approved by the Commission for 
trading.\27\ The ETFs hold ETH futures contracts that trade on the CME 
and settle using the CME CF Ethereum Reference Rate (``ERR''), which is 
priced based on the spot ETH markets Coinbase, Kraken, LMAX, Bitstamp, 
Gemini, and itBit, essentially the same spot markets that are included 
in the Index that the Trust uses to value its ETH holdings. Given that 
the Commission has approved ETFs that offer exposure to ETH futures, 
which themselves are priced based on the underlying spot ETH market, 
the Sponsor believes that the Commission must also approve ETPs that 
offer exposure to spot ETH, like the Trust.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ These ETFs included the Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF, 
Bitwise Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF, Hashdex Ether 
Strategy ETF, ProShares Ether Strategy ETF, ProShares Bitcoin & 
Ether Strategy ETF, ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy 
ETF, Valkyrie Bitcoin & Ethereum Strategy ETF, VanEck Ethereum 
Strategy ETF, and Volatility Shares Ethereum Strategy ETF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the context of other digital asset-based ETF and ETP proposals 
for Bitcoin, the Commission has sought to justify treating futures-
based ETFs differently from spot-based ETFs because of (i) distinctions 
between the regulations under which the two products would be 
registered (the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the `` '40 Act'') for 
digital-asset futures ETFs and '33 Act for spot digital-asset ETPs) and 
(ii) the existence of regulation and surveillance-sharing over the CME 
digital-asset futures market through the Intermarket Surveillance Group 
(``ISG''), as compared to the spot market for those digital assets.\28\ 
The Sponsor believes that this reasoning is unsupported for the 
following reasons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ See, e.g., Chair Gary Gensler Public Statement, ``Remarks 
Before the Aspen Security Forum,'' (August 3, 2021), stating that 
the Chair looked forward to the Commission's review of Bitcoin-based 
ETF proposals registered under the '40 Act, ``particularly if those 
are limited to [the] CME-traded Bitcoin futures,'' noting the 
``significant investor protection'' offered by the '40 Act, https://www.sec.gov/news/public-statement/gensler-aspen-security-forum-2021-08-03; Securities Exchange Act Release No. 93559 (November 12, 
2021), 86 FR 64539 (November 18, 2021) (SR-CboeBZX-2021-019) (Order 
Disapproving a Proposed Rule Change to List and Trade Shares of the 
VanEck Bitcoin Trust under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based 
Trust Shares) (``VanEck Order'') (denying the first spot bitcoin ETP 
registered under the '33 Act following the first approval of a 
bitcoin futures ETF registered under the `40 Act, noting the 
differences in the standard of review that applies to such 
products); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94620 (April 6, 
2022), 87 FR 21676 (April 12, 2022) (SR-NYSEArca-2021-53) (Order 
Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by 
Amendment No. 2, to List and Trade Shares of the Teucrium Bitcoin 
Futures Fund under NYSE ARCA Rule 8.200-E, Commentary .02 (Trust 
Issued Receipts)) (``Teucrium Order'') (approving the first bitcoin 
futures ETP registered under the '33 Act, stating that ``With 
respect to the proposed ETP, the underlying bitcoin assets are CME 
bitcoin futures contracts. The relevant analysis, therefore, is 
whether Arca has a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement with 
a regulated market of significant size related to CME bitcoin 
futures contracts. As discussed below, taking into consideration the 
direct relationship between the regulated market with which Arca has 
a surveillance-sharing agreement and the assets held by the proposed 
ETP, as well as developments with respect to the CME bitcoin futures 
market--including the launch of exchange-traded funds registered 
under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (``1940 Act'') that hold 
CME bitcoin futures (``Bitcoin Futures ETFs'')--the Commission 
concludes that the Exchange has the requisite surveillance-sharing 
agreement.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The '40 Act Offers No More Investor Protections Than the '33 Act in the 
Context of ETH-Based ETF and ETP Proposals
    While the '40 Act has certain added investor protections that the 
'33 Act does not require, these protections do not seek to allay harms 
arising from underlying assets or markets of assets that ETFs hold, 
such as the potential for fraud or manipulation in such markets. In 
other words, the Sponsor does not believe that the application of the 
'40 Act supports the purported justifications the Commission has made 
in denying other spot digital asset ETPs. Instead, the '40 Act seeks to 
remedy certain abusive practices in the management of investment 
companies such as ETFs, and thus places certain restrictions on ETFs 
and ETF sponsors. The '40 Act explicitly lists out the types of abuses 
it seeks to prevent, and places certain restrictions related to 
accounting, borrowing, custody, fees, and independent boards, among 
others. Notably, none of these restrictions address an ETF's underlying 
assets, whether ETH futures or spot ETH, or the markets from which such 
assets' pricing is derived, whether the CME ETH futures market or spot 
ETH markets. As a result, the Sponsor believes that the distinction 
between registration of ETH futures ETFs under the '40 Act and the 
registration of spot ETH ETPs under the '33 Act is one without a 
difference in the context of ETH-based ETP proposals.
Surveillance-Sharing With the CME ETH Futures Market Is Sufficient To 
Protect Against Fraud and Manipulation in the Underlying Spot ETH 
Market
    The Sponsor believes that, because the CME ETH futures market is 
priced based on the underlying spot ETH market, any fraud or 
manipulation in the spot market would necessarily affect the price of 
ETH futures, thereby affecting the net asset value of an ETP holding 
spot ETH or an ETF holding ETH futures, as well as the price investors 
pay for such product's shares. Accordingly, either CME surveillance can 
detect spot-market fraud that affects both futures ETFs and spot ETPs, 
or that surveillance cannot do so for either type of product. Having 
approved ETH futures ETFs in part on the basis of such surveillance, 
the Commission has clearly determined that CME surveillance can detect 
spot-market fraud that would affect spot ETPs, and the Sponsor thus 
believes that it must also approve spot ETH ETPs on that basis.
* * * * *
    In summary, the Sponsor believes that the distinctions between the 
'40 Act and the '33 Act, and the surveillance-sharing available for the 
CME ETH futures market versus the spot ETH market, are not meaningful 
in the context of ETH-based ETF and ETP proposals, and that such 
reasoning cannot be a basis for the Commission treating ETH futures 
ETFs differently from spot ETH ETPs like the Trust. The Sponsor 
believes that the Commission's approval of ETH futures ETFs means it 
must also approve spot ETH ETPs like the Trust.
The Structure and Operation of the Trust Protects Investors and 
Satisfies Commission Requirements for ETH-Based Exchange Traded 
Products
    Even if the Commission had not approved ETH futures ETFs, the 
Sponsor still believes the Commission should approve the listing and 
trading of Shares of the Trust. In the context of prior spot digital 
asset ETP proposal disapproval orders for Bitcoin, the Commission 
expressed concerns about

[[Page 73903]]

the underlying Digital Asset Market due to the potential for fraud and 
manipulation and has outlined the reasons why such ETP proposals have 
been unable to satisfy these concerns.\29\ For purposes of the Trust's 
ETH-based ETP proposal, the Sponsor anticipates that the Commission may 
have the same concerns and addresses each of these in turn below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 83723 (July 26, 
2018), 83 FR 37579 (August 1, 2018) (SR-BatsBZX-2016-30) (Order 
Setting Aside Action by Delegated Authority and Disapproving a 
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendments No. 1 and 2, To List 
and Trade Shares of the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust) (the ``Winklevoss 
Order''); 87267 (October 9, 2019), 84 FR 55382 (October 16, 2019) 
(SR-NYSEArca-2019-01) (Order Disapproving a Proposed Rule Change, as 
Modified by Amendment No. 1, Relating to the Listing and Trading of 
Shares of the Bitwise Bitcoin ETF Trust Under NYSE Arca Rule 8.201-
E) (the ``Bitwise Order''); 88284 (February 26, 2020), 85 FR 12595 
(March 3, 2020) (SR-NYSEArca-2019-39) (Order Disapproving a Proposed 
Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, to Amend NYSE Arca Rule 
8.201-E (Commodity-Based Trust Shares) and to List and Trade Shares 
of the United States Bitcoin and Treasury Investment Trust Under 
NYSE Arca Rule 8.201-E) (the ``Wilshire Phoenix Order''); 83904 
(August 22, 2018), 83 FR 43934 (August 28, 2018) (SR-NYSEArca-2017-
139) (Order Disapproving a Proposed Rule Change to List and Trade 
the Shares of the ProShares Bitcoin ETF and the ProShares Short 
Bitcoin ETF) (the ``ProShares Order''); 83912 (August 22, 2018), 83 
FR 43912 (August 28, 2018) (SR-NYSEArca-2018-02) (Order Disapproving 
a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Listing and Trading of the 
Direxion Daily Bitcoin Bear 1X Shares, Direxion Daily Bitcoin 1.25X 
Bull Shares, Direxion Daily Bitcoin 1.5X Bull Shares, Direxion Daily 
Bitcoin 2X Bull Shares, and Direxion Daily Bitcoin 2X Bear Shares 
Under NYSE Arca Rule 8.200-E) (the ``Direxion Order''); 83913 
(August 22, 2018), 83 FR 43923 (August 28, 2018) (SR-CboeBZX-2018-
01) (Order Disapproving a Proposed Rule Change to List and Trade the 
Shares of the GraniteShares Bitcoin ETF and the GraniteShares Short 
Bitcoin ETF) (the ``GraniteShares Order'') (together, the ``Prior 
Spot Digital Asset ETP Disapproval Orders'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the Prior Spot Digital Asset ETP Disapproval Orders, the 
Commission outlined that a proposal relating to a digital asset-based 
ETP could satisfy its concerns regarding potential for fraud and 
manipulation by demonstrating:
    (1) Inherent Resistance to Fraud and Manipulation: that the 
underlying commodity market is inherently resistant to fraud and 
manipulation;
    (2) Other Means to Prevent Fraud and Manipulation: that there are 
other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices 
that are sufficient; or
    (3) Surveillance Sharing: that the listing exchange has entered 
into a surveillance sharing agreement with a regulated market of 
significant size relating to the underlying or reference assets.
    As described below, the Sponsor believes the structure and 
operation of the Trust are designed to prevent fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices, to protect investors and the public 
interest, and to respond to the specific concerns that the Commission 
may have with respect to potential fraud and manipulation in the 
context of an ETH-based ETP.
How the Trust Meets Standards in the Prior Spot Digital Asset ETP 
Disapproval Orders
1. Resistance to or Prevention of Fraud and Manipulation
    In the Prior Spot Digital Asset ETP Disapproval Orders, the 
Commission disagreed with the proposition that a digital asset's 
fungibility, transportability and exchange tradability combine to 
provide unique protections against, and allow such digital asset to be 
uniquely resistant to, attempts at price manipulation. The Commission 
reached its conclusion based on concessions by one issuer that 95% of 
the reported trading in the digital asset, Bitcoin, is ``fake'' or non-
economic, effectively admitting that the properties of Bitcoin do not 
make it inherently resistant to manipulation. Such issuer's concessions 
were further compounded by evidence of potential and actual fraud and 
manipulation in the historical trading of Bitcoin on certain 
marketplaces such as (1) ``wash'' trading, (2) trading based on 
material, non-public information, including the dissemination of false 
and misleading information, (3) manipulative activity involving Tether, 
and (4) fraud and manipulation.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ See Bitwise Order, 84 FR at 55383 (discussing analysis of 
the Bitcoin spot market that asserts that 95% of the spot market is 
dominated by fake and non-economic activity, such as wash trades), 
55391 (discussing possible sources of fraud and manipulation in the 
bitcoin spot market). See also Winklevoss Order, 83 FR at 37585-86 
(discussing pending litigation against a Bitcoin trading platform 
for fraudulent conduct relating to Tether); Bitwise Order, 84 FR at 
55391 n.140, 55402 & n.331 (same); Winklevoss Order, 83 FR at 37584-
86 (discussing potential types of manipulation in the Bitcoin spot 
market). The Commission has also noted that fraud and manipulation 
in the Bitcoin spot market could persist for a significant duration. 
See, e.g., Bitwise Order, 84 FR at 55405 & n.379.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Sponsor acknowledges the possibility that fraud and 
manipulation may exist in commodity markets and that digital asset 
trading, such as ETH, on any given exchange may be no more uniquely 
resistant to fraud and manipulation than other commodity markets.\31\ 
However, the Sponsor believes that the fundamental features of digital 
assets, including fungibility, transportability and exchange 
tradability offer novel protections beyond those that exist in 
traditional commodity markets or equity markets when combined with 
other means, as discussed further below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ See generally Bitwise Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Other Means To Prevent Fraud and Manipulation
    The Commission has recognized that a listing exchange could 
demonstrate that other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative 
acts and practices are sufficient to justify dispensing with the 
requisite surveillance-sharing agreement.\32\ In evaluating the 
effectiveness of this type of resistance, the Commission does not apply 
a ``cannot be manipulated'' standard. Instead, the Commission requires 
that such resistance to fraud and manipulation be novel and beyond 
those protections that exist in traditional commodity markets or equity 
markets for which the Commission has long required surveillance-sharing 
agreements in the context of listing derivative securities 
products.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ See Winklevoss Order, 84 FR at 37580, 37582-91; Bitwise 
Order, 84 FR at 55383, 55385-406; Wilshire Phoenix Order, 85 FR at 
12597.
    \33\ See Winklevoss Order, 84 FR at 37582; Wilshire Phoenix 
Order, 85 FR at 12597.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Sponsor believes the Index represents a novel means to prevent 
fraud and manipulation from impacting a reference price for ETH and 
that it offers protections beyond those that exist in traditional 
commodity markets or equity markets. The Index operates materially 
similarly to CoinDesk Bitcoin Price Index (XBX). Specifically, digital 
assets, such as ETH, are novel and exist outside traditional commodity 
markets. It therefore stands to reason that the methods by which they 
trade will be novel and that the market for digital assets like ETH 
will have different attributes than traditional commodity markets. 
Digital assets like ETH were only introduced within the past decade, 
twenty years after the first U.S. ETFs were offered \34\ and 150 years 
after the first futures were offered.\35\ In contrast to older 
commodities such as gold, silver, platinum, palladium or copper, which 
the Commission has noted all had at least one significant, regulated 
market for trading futures on the underlying commodity at the time 
commodity trust ETPs were approved for listing and trading, the first 
trading in digital assets like ETH took place entirely in an open, 
transparent and online setting where other commodities cannot trade.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ SEC, ``Investor Bulletin: Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs),'' 
August 2012, https://www.sec.gov/investor/alerts/etfs.pdf.
    \35\ Commodity Futures Trading Commission (``CFTC''), ``History 
of the CFTC,'' https://www.cftc.gov/About/HistoryoftheCFTC/history_precftc.html.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 73904]]

    The Trust has priced its Shares consistently for more than six 
years based on the Index. The Sponsor believes the Trust's use of the 
Index specifically addresses the Commission's concerns in that the 
Index serves as an alternative means to prevent fraud and manipulation. 
Specifically, the Index can (i) mitigate the effects of fraud, 
manipulation and other anomalous trading activity on the ETH reference 
rate, (ii) provide a real-time, volume-weighted fair value of ETH and 
(iii) appropriately handle and adjust for non-market related events.
    As described in more detail below, the Sponsor believes that the 
Index accomplishes those objectives in the following ways:
    1. The Index tracks the Digital Asset Exchange Market price through 
trading activity at ``U.S.-Compliant Exchanges''; \36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ ``U.S.-Compliant Exchanges'' are exchanges in the Digital 
Asset Exchange Market that are compliant with applicable U.S. 
federal and state licensing requirements and practices regarding AML 
and KYC regulations. All Constituent Exchanges are U.S.-Compliant 
Exchanges. ``Non-U.S.-Compliant Exchanges'' are all other exchanges 
in the Digital Asset Exchange Market. As of June 30, 2023, the U.S.-
Compliant Exchanges that the Index Provider considered for inclusion 
in the Index were Coinbase Pro, Kraken and LMAX Digital. From these 
U.S.-Compliant Exchanges, the Index Provider then applies additional 
Inclusion Criteria to determine the Constituent Exchange. Effective 
July 23, 2022, the Index Provider removed Bitstamp from the Index 
due to the exchange's failure to meet the minimum liquidity 
requirement and added FTX.US as a Constituent Exchange based on its 
satisfaction of the minimum liquidity requirement as part of its 
scheduled quarterly review. Effective November 10, 2022, the Index 
Provider removed FTX.US from the Index due to FTX.US's announcement 
that trading on the exchange may be halted, which would impact 
FTX.US's ability to reliably publish trade prices and volumes on a 
real-time basis through APIs, and did not add any Constituent 
Exchanges as part of its review. Effective January 28, 2023, the 
Index Provider added Binance.US to the Index based on the exchange 
meeting the minimum liquidity requirement, and did not remove any 
Constituent Exchanges as part of its quarterly review. On June 17, 
2023, the Index Provider removed Binance.US from the Index, due to 
Binance.US's announcement that the exchange was suspending U.S. 
dollar deposits and withdrawals and planned to delist its U.S. 
dollar trading pairs, and did not add any Constituent Exchanges as 
part of its review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. The Index mitigates the impact of instances of fraud, 
manipulation and other anomalous trading activity in real-time through 
systematic adjustments;
    3. The Index is constructed and maintained by an expert third-party 
index provider, allowing for prudent handling of non-market-related 
events; and
    4. The Index mitigates the impact of instances of fraud, 
manipulation and other anomalous trading activity concentrated on any 
one specific exchange through a cross-exchange composite index rate.
    1. The Index tracks the Digital Asset Exchange Market price through 
trading activity at ``U.S.-Compliant Exchanges.''
    To reduce the risk of fraud, manipulation, and other anomalous 
trading activity from impacting the Index, only U.S.-Compliant 
Exchanges are eligible to be included in the Index.
    The Index maintains a minimum number of three exchanges and a 
maximum number of five exchanges to track the Digital Asset Exchange 
Market while offering replicability for traders and market makers.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\ According to the Sponsor, the more exchanges included in 
the Index, the more ability there is for traders and market makers 
to trade against the Index by arbitraging price differences. For 
example, in the event of variances between ETH prices on Constituent 
Exchanges and non-Constituent Exchanges, arbitrage trading 
opportunities would exist. These discrepancies generally consolidate 
over time, as price differences across exchanges are realized and 
capitalized upon by traders and market makers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    U.S.-Compliant Exchanges possess safeguards that protect against 
fraud and manipulation. For example, U.S.-Compliant Exchanges regulated 
by the NYDFS under the BitLicense program have regulatory requirements 
to implement measures designed to effectively detect, prevent, and 
respond to fraud, attempted fraud, market manipulation, and similar 
wrongdoing, and to monitor, control, investigate and report back to the 
NYDFS regarding any wrongdoing.\38\ These exchanges also have the 
following obligations: \39\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ See, e.g., ``DFS Takes Action to Deter Fraud and 
Manipulation in Virtual Currency Markets,'' available at: https://www.dfs.ny.gov/about/press/pr1802071.htm.
    \39\ See ``New York's Final ``BitLicense'' Rule: Overview and 
Changes from July 2014 Proposal,'' June 5, 2015, Davis Polk, 
available at: https://www.davispolk.com/files/new_yorks_final_bitlicense_rule_overview_changes_july_2014_proposal.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Submission of audited financial statements including 
income statements, statements of assets/liabilities, insurance, and 
banking;
     Compliance with capitalization requirements set at NYDFS's 
discretion;
     Prohibitions against the sale or encumbrance to protect 
full reserves of custodian assets;
     Fingerprints and photographs of employees with access to 
customer funds;
     Retention of a qualified Chief Information Security 
Officer and annual penetration testing/audits;
     Documented business continuity and disaster recovery plan, 
independently tested annually; and
     Participation in an independent exam by NYDFS.
    Other U.S.-Compliant Exchanges have voluntarily implemented 
measures to protect against common forms of market manipulation.\40\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \40\ As of the date of filing, one of the three Constituent 
Exchanges, Coinbase Pro, is regulated by NYDFS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Furthermore, all U.S.-Compliant Exchanges are considered MSBs that 
are subject to FinCEN's federal and state reporting requirements that 
provide additional safeguards. For example, unscrupulous traders may be 
less likely to engage in fraudulent or manipulative acts and practices 
on exchanges that (1) report suspicious activity to FinCEN as money 
services businesses, (2) report to state regulators as money 
transmitters, and/or (3) require customer identification through KYC 
procedures. U.S.-Compliant Exchanges are required to: \41\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \41\ See BSA Requirements for MSBs, FinCEN website: https://www.fincen.gov/bsarequirements-msbs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Identify people with ownership stakes or controlling roles 
in the MSB;
     Establish a formal Anti-Money Laundering (AML) policy in 
place with documentation, training, independent review, and a named 
compliance officer;
     Implement strict customer identification and verification 
policies and procedures;
     File Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) for suspicious 
customer transactions;
     File Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs) for cash-in or 
cash-out transactions greater than $10,000; and
     Maintain a five-year record of currency exchanges greater 
than $1,000 and money transfers greater than $3,000.
    Lastly, because of ETH's classification as a commodity, the CFTC 
has authority to police fraud and manipulation on U.S.-Compliant 
Exchanges.\42\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \42\ ``U.S. CFTC Chief Behnam Reinforces View of Ether as 
Commodity,'' Coindesk (Mar. 28, 2023), https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2023/03/28/us-cftc-chief-behnam-reinforces-view-of-ether-as-commodity/; CME Group, https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/cryptocurrencies/ether/ether.html?gad=1&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI44KBmu7ygAMVavvjBx2P4g5yEAAYASAAEgJSZfD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Sponsor acknowledges that there are substantial differences 
between FinCEN and New York state regulations and the Commission's 
regulation of the national securities exchanges.\43\ The Sponsor does 
not believe the inclusion of U.S.-Compliant Exchanges is in and of 
itself sufficient to prove that the Index is an alternative means to 
prevent fraud and manipulation such that surveillance sharing 
agreements are not required, but does believe that the inclusion of 
only U.S.-Compliant Exchanges in the Index is one significant way in 
which the Index is

[[Page 73905]]

protected from the potential impacts of fraud and manipulation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \43\ See Bitwise Order, 84 FR at 55392; Wilshire Phoenix Order, 
85 FR at 12603.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. The Index mitigates the impact of instances of fraud, 
manipulation, and other anomalous trading activity in real-time through 
systematic adjustments.
    The Index is calculated once every second according to a systematic 
methodology that relies on observed trading activity on the Constituent 
Exchanges. While the precise methodology underlying the Index is 
currently proprietary, the key elements of the Index are outlined 
below:
     Volume Weighting: Constituent Exchanges with greater 
liquidity receive a higher weighting in the Index, increasing the 
ability to execute against (i.e., replicate) the Index in the 
underlying spot markets.
     Price-Variance Weighting: The Index reflects data points 
that are discretely weighted in proportion to their variance from the 
rest of the Constituent Exchanges. As the price at a Constituent 
Exchange diverges from the prices at the rest of the Constituent 
Exchanges, its weight in the Index consequently decreases.
     Inactivity Adjustment: The Index algorithm penalizes stale 
activity from any given Constituent Exchange. When a Constituent 
Exchange does not have recent trading data, its weighting in the Index 
is gradually reduced, until it is de-weighted entirely. Similarly, once 
trading activity at the Constituent Exchange resumes, the corresponding 
weighting for that Constituent Exchange is gradually increased until it 
reaches the appropriate level.
     Manipulation Resistance: In order to mitigate the effects 
of wash trading and order book spoofing, the Index only includes 
executed trades in its calculation. Additionally, the Index only 
includes Constituent Exchanges that charge trading fees to its users in 
order to attach a real, quantifiable cost to any manipulation attempts.
    3. The Index is constructed and maintained by an expert third-party 
index provider, allowing for prudent handling of non-market-related 
events.
    The Index Provider reviews and periodically updates which exchanges 
are included in the Index by utilizing a methodology that is guided by 
the IOSCO principles for financial benchmarks.
    According to the Index methodology, for an exchange to become a 
Constituent Exchange, it must satisfy the following Inclusion Criteria:
     Sufficient USD liquidity relative to the size of the 
listed assets;
     No evidence in the past 12 months of trading restrictions 
on individuals or entities that would otherwise meet the exchange's 
eligibility requirements to trade;
     No evidence in the past 12 months of undisclosed 
restrictions on deposits or withdrawals from user accounts;
     Real-time price discovery;
     Limited or no capital controls;
     Transparent ownership including a publicly-owned ownership 
entity;
     Publicly available language and policies addressing legal 
and regulatory compliance in the US, including KYC (Know Your 
Customer), AML (Anti-Money Laundering) and other policies designed to 
comply with relevant regulations that might apply to it;
     Be a U.S.-domiciled exchange or a non-U.S. domiciled 
exchange that is able to service U.S. investors;
     Offer programmatic spot trading of the trading pair; and
     Reliably publish trade prices and volumes on a real-time 
basis through Rest and Websocket APIs.
    Although the Index methodology is designed to operate without any 
human interference, rare events would justify manual intervention. 
Manual intervention would only be in response to ``non-market-related 
events'' (e.g., halting of deposits or withdrawals of funds, 
unannounced closure of exchange operations, insolvency, compromise of 
user funds, etc.). In the event that such an intervention is necessary, 
the Index Provider would issue a public announcement through its 
website, API and other established communication channels with its 
clients.\44\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \44\ To the extent any such intervention has a material impact 
on the Trust, the Sponsor will also issue a public announcement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    4. The Index mitigates the impact of instances of fraud, 
manipulation and other anomalous trading activity concentrated on any 
one specific exchange through a cross-exchange composite index rate.
    The Index is based on the price and volume data of multiple U.S.-
Compliant Exchanges that satisfy the Index Provider's Inclusion 
Criteria. By referencing multiple trading venues and weighting them 
based on trade activity, the impact of any potential fraud, 
manipulation, or anomalous trading activity occurring on any single 
venue is reduced. Specifically, the effects of fraud, manipulation, or 
anomalous trading activity occurring on any single venue are de-
weighted and consequently diluted by non-anomalous trading activity 
from other Constituent Exchanges.
    Although the Index is designed to accurately capture the market 
price of ETH, third parties may be able to purchase and sell ETH on 
public or private markets included or not included among the 
Constituent Exchanges, and such transactions may take place at prices 
materially higher or lower than the Index Price. For example, based on 
data provided by the Index Provider, on any given day during the twelve 
months ended June 30, 2023, the maximum differential between the 4:00 
p.m., New York time spot price of any single Digital Asset Exchange 
included in the Index and the Index Price was 2.76% and the average of 
the maximum differentials of the 4:00 p.m., New York time spot price of 
each Digital Asset Exchange included in the Index and the Index Price 
was 0.82%. During this same period, the average differential between 
the 4:00 p.m., New York time spot prices of all the Digital Asset 
Exchanges included in the Index and the Index Price was 0.01%.\45\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \45\ All Digital Asset Exchanges that were included in the Index 
throughout the period were considered in this analysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Since inception of the Trust, the Trust has consistently priced its 
Shares at 4:00 p.m., New York time based on the Index Price.\46\ While 
that pricing would be known to the market, the Sponsor believes that, 
even if efforts to manipulate the price of ETH at 4:00 p.m., E.T. were 
successful on any exchange, such activity would have had a negligible 
effect on the pricing of the Trust, due to the controls embedded in the 
structure of the Index.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \46\ Prior to February 1, 2022, the Trust valued its ETH for 
operational purposes by reference to the volume-weighted average 
Index Price (the ``Old Index Price''). The Old Index Price was 
calculated by applying a weighting algorithm to the price and 
trading volume data for the immediately preceding 24-hour period as 
of 4:00 p.m., New York time, derived from the Constituent Exchanges 
reflected in the Index on such trade date, and overlaying an 
averaging mechanism to the price produced. Thus, whereas the Old 
Index Price reflected the price of an ETH at 4:00 p.m., New York 
time, calculated by taking the average of each price of an ETH 
produced by the Index over the preceding 24-hour period, the Index 
Price now is the price of an ETH at 4:00 p.m., New York time, 
calculated based on the price and trading volume data of the Digital 
Asset Exchanges included in the Index over the preceding 24-hour 
period. The Index Price differs from the Old Index Price only in 
that it does not use an additional averaging mechanism; the Index 
Price otherwise uses the same methodology as the Old Index Price, 
and there has been no change to the Index used to determine the 
Index Price or the criteria used to select the Constituent 
Exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, the Sponsor believes that the Index has proven its 
ability to (i) mitigate the effects of fraud, manipulation and other 
anomalous trading activity on the ETH reference rate, (ii) provide a 
real-time, volume-weighted fair value of ETH and (iii) appropriately 
handle and adjust for non-market related events. For these reasons, the 
Sponsor believes that the Index

[[Page 73906]]

represents an effective alternative means to prevent fraud and 
manipulation and the Trust's reliance on the Index addresses the 
Commission's concerns with respect to potential fraud and manipulation.
3. A Significant, Regulated and Surveilled Market Exists and Is Closely 
Connected With Spot Market for ETH
    In the Prior Spot Digital Asset ETP Disapproval Orders, the 
Commission described both the need for and the definition of a 
surveilled market of significant size for commodity-trust ETPs like the 
Trust to date.\47\ Specifically, the Commission explained that:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \47\ See Winklevoss Order, 83 FR at 37593-94; Bitwise Order, 84 
FR at 55383, 55410; Wilshire Phoenix Order, 85 FR at 12609.

for the commodity-trust ETPs approved to date for listing and 
trading, there has been in every case at least one significant, 
regulated market for trading futures on the underlying commodity--
whether gold, silver, platinum, palladium, or copper--and the ETP 
listing exchange has entered into surveillance-sharing agreements 
with, or held Intermarket Surveillance Group membership in common 
with, that market.\48\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \48\ See Winklevoss Order, 83 FR at 37594.

    Further, the Commission stated that its interpretation of the term 
``market of significant size'' depends on the interrelationship between 
the market with which the listing exchange has a surveillance-sharing 
agreement and the proposed ETP.\49\ Accordingly, the terms 
``significant market'' and ``market of significant size'' could mean:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \49\ See Winklevoss Order, 83 FR at 37594; Bitwise Order, 84 FR 
at 55410; ProShares Order, 83 FR at 43936; GraniteShares Order, 83 
FR at 43925; Direxion Order, 83 FR at 43914; Wilshire Phoenix Order, 
85 FR at 12609.

a market (or group of markets) as to which (a) there is a reasonable 
likelihood that a person attempting to manipulate the ETP would also 
have to trade on that market to successfully manipulate the ETP, so 
that a surveillance-sharing agreement would assist in detecting and 
deterring misconduct, and (b) it is unlikely that trading in the ETP 
would be the predominant influence on prices in that market.\50\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \50\ See Winklevoss Order, 83 FR at 37594. This definition is 
illustrative and not exclusive. There could be other types of 
``significant markets'' and ``markets of significant size,'' but 
this definition is an example that will provide guidance to market 
participants.

    In the context of the Prior Spot Digital Asset ETP Disapproval 
Orders specifically, the Commission has stated that establishing a 
lead-lag relationship between the futures market and the spot market is 
central to understanding whether it is reasonably likely that a would-
be manipulator of the ETP would need to trade on the futures market to 
successfully manipulate prices on those spot platforms that feed into 
the proposed ETP's pricing mechanism such that a surveillance-sharing 
agreement would assist the ETP listing market in detecting and 
deterring misconduct.\51\ In particular, if the spot market leads the 
futures market, this would indicate that it would not be necessary to 
trade on the futures market to manipulate the proposed ETP, even if 
arbitrage worked efficiently, because the futures price would move to 
meet the spot price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \51\ See Bitwise Order, 84 FR at 55411; Wilshire Phoenix Order, 
85 FR at 12612.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While studies have found that the CME futures market does lead the 
spot market in the context of Bitcoin,\52\ as explained in the 
Sponsor's briefs and argument in its prevailing case before the D.C. 
Circuit Court of Appeals regarding its Bitcoin-based ETP proposal, the 
lead/lag question is irrelevant. If a would-be manipulator were to 
attempt to manipulate either a spot ETP or futures ETP by trading 
futures on the CME, then a surveillance-sharing agreement with the CME 
would provide access to information concerning that activity.\53\ If, 
on the other hand, a would-be manipulator were to attempt to manipulate 
either a spot ETP or a futures ETP by trading on the spot market, then 
a surveillance-sharing agreement with the CME would also be able to 
provide access to information concerning that activity. If that were 
not true, the Commission could not have approved the Bitcoin futures 
ETPs. Given that the Commission has approved Bitcoin futures ETPs, the 
Commission must have concluded that the CME is capable of detecting 
manipulation attempts in the spot bitcoin market. And given that the 
Commission has now approved ETH futures ETFs, it must have concluded 
that the CME is capable of detecting manipulation attempts in the spot 
ETH market as well. Accordingly, the Sponsor believes that disapproval 
of the instant proposal on such grounds would be arbitrary given that 
Shares of the Trust would be just as protected from fraud as shares of 
previously approved ETH futures ETPs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \52\ See Memorandum to File from Neel Maitra, Senior Special 
Counsel (Fintech & Crypto Specialist), Division of Trading and 
Markets, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission re: Meeting with 
Representatives from Fidelity Digital Assets, et al. and attachment 
(SR-CboeBZX-2021-039) (September 8, 2021), available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboebzx-2021-039/srcboebzx2021039-250110.pdf; Letter from Bitwise Asset Management, Inc. re: File 
Number SR-NYSEArca-2021-89 (February 25, 2022), available at: 
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nysearca-2021-89/srnysearca202189-20117902-270822.pdf; Letter from Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati, 
P.C. and Chapman and Cutler LLP, on behalf of Bitwise Asset 
Management, Inc. re: File No. SR-NYSEArca-2021-89 (March 7, 2022), 
available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nysearca-2021-89/srnysearca202189-20118794-271630.pdf.
    \53\ Grayscale Investments, LLC v. Securities and Exchange 
Commission, No. 22-1142, Commission Reply Br. 27.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regardless of the irrelevance of the lead/lag relationship and the 
mixed findings regarding the lead/lag relationship between the CME 
futures and spot markets in the context of Bitcoin, the Sponsor 
believes that the CME futures market represents a large, surveilled and 
regulated market and meets the Commission's definition of a 
``significant market.'' For example, from November 1, 2019 to August 
31, 2023, the CME futures market trading volume was over $373 billion, 
compared to $701 billion in trading volume across the Constituent 
Exchanges included in the Index. With over 50% of the Index trading 
volume, the CME futures market represents significant coverage of U.S.-
Compliant Exchanges in the Ether market. In addition, the CME futures 
market trading volume from November 1, 2019 to August 31, 2023 was 
approximately 43% of the trading volume of the U.S. dollar-denominated 
spot markets referenced in the Bitwise Order.\54\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \54\ These spot markets include Binance.US, Coinbase Pro, 
Bitfinex, Kraken, Bitstamp, BitFlyer, Poloniex, Bittrex, and itBit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Given the size of the CME futures markets, the Sponsor believes 
such markets meet the Commission's definition of ``significant market'' 
because there is a reasonable likelihood that a person attempting to 
manipulate the ETP would also have to trade on that market to 
successfully manipulate the ETP, since arbitrage between the derivative 
and spot markets would tend to counter an attempt to manipulate the 
spot market alone. As a result, the Exchange's ability to obtain 
information regarding trading in the Shares and futures from markets 
and other entities that are members of the Intermarket Trading Group 
(``ISG''), including the CME, would assist the Exchange in detecting 
and deterring misconduct.
    The Sponsor also believes it is unlikely that the ETP would become 
the predominant influence on prices in the market. While future inflows 
to the proposed Trust cannot be predicted, to provide comparable data, 
the Sponsor examined the change in market capitalization of ETH with 
net inflows into the Trust, which currently trades on OTC Markets and 
is largest and most liquid ETH investment product in the

[[Page 73907]]

world.\55\ From November 1, 2019 to August 31, 2023, the market 
capitalization of ETH grew from $20 billion to $198 billion, a $178 
billion increase. Over the same period, the Trust experienced $1.2 
billion of inflows. The cumulative inflow into the Trust over the 
stated time period was only 0.6% of the aggregate growth of ETH's 
market capitalization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \55\ To further illustrate the size and liquidity of the Trust, 
as of September 6, 2023, compared with global commodity ETPs, the 
Trust would rank 24th in assets under management and 83rd in 
notional trading volume for the preceding 30 days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, the Trust experienced approximately $70.2 billion of 
trading volume from November 1, 2019 to August 31, 2023, only 19% of 
the CME futures market and 10% of the Index over the same period.
* * * * *
    In summary, the Sponsor believes that the foregoing addresses 
concerns the Commission may have with respect to ETH-based ETPs, based 
on the Commission's articulated concerns with respect to potential 
fraud and manipulation in Bitcoin-based ETPs. Specifically, the Sponsor 
believes that, although ETH is not itself inherently resistant to fraud 
and manipulation, the Index represents an effective means to prevent 
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices. As discussed above, the 
Trust has used the Index to price the Shares for more than six years, 
and the Index has proven its ability to (i) mitigate the effects of 
fraud, manipulation and other anomalous trading activity on the ETH 
reference rate, (ii) provide a real-time, volume-weighted fair value of 
ETH and (iii) appropriately handle and adjust for non-market related 
events. The Sponsor also believes that the CME futures market is a 
significant, surveilled and regulated market that is closely connected 
with the spot market for ETH and fulfills the requirements for 
surveillance sharing given the Exchange's ability to obtain information 
from markets and other entities that are members of the ISG to assist 
in detecting and deterring misconduct.
Creation of Shares
    According to the Annual Report, the Trust will issue Shares to 
Authorized Participants from time to time, but only in one or more 
Baskets (with a Basket being a block of 100 Shares). The Trust will not 
issue fractions of a Basket. The creation of Baskets will be made only 
in exchange for the delivery to the Trust, or the distribution by the 
Trust, of the number of whole and fractional ETH represented by each 
Basket being created, which is determined by dividing (x) the number of 
ETH owned by the Trust at 4:00 p.m., E.T., on the trade date of a 
creation order, after deducting the number of ETH representing the U.S. 
dollar value of accrued but unpaid fees and expenses of the Trust 
(converted using the Index Price at such time, and carried to the 
eighth decimal place), by (y) the number of Shares outstanding at such 
time (with the quotient so obtained calculated to one one-hundred-
millionth of one ETH (i.e., carried to the eighth decimal place)), and 
multiplying such quotient by 100 (the ``Basket Amount''). All questions 
as to the calculation of the Basket Amount will be conclusively 
determined by the Sponsor and will be final and binding on all persons 
interested in the Trust. The Basket Amount multiplied by the number of 
Baskets being created is the ``Total Basket Amount.'' The number of ETH 
represented by a Share will gradually decrease over time as the Trust's 
ETH are used to pay the Trust's expenses. As of June 30, 2023, each 
Share represented approximately 0.0097 of one ETH.
    Authorized Participants are the only persons that may place orders 
to create Baskets. Each Authorized Participant must (i) be a registered 
broker-dealer, (ii) enter into an agreement with the Sponsor and the 
Liquidity Provider (as defined below), if applicable, that provides the 
procedures for the creation and redemption of Baskets and for the 
delivery of ETH required for Creation Baskets and Redemption Baskets 
(each, a ``Participant Agreement'') and (iii) in the case of creation 
or redemption in-kind, own an ETH wallet address that is known to the 
Custodian as belonging to the Authorized Participant. An Authorized 
Participant may act for its own account or as agent for broker-dealers, 
custodians and other securities market participants that wish to create 
or redeem Baskets. Shareholders who are not Authorized Participants 
will only be able to redeem their Shares through an Authorized 
Participant.
    Although the creation of Baskets requires the delivery to the Trust 
of the Total Basket Amount, an Authorized Participant may deposit cash, 
which will facilitate the purchase or sale of ETH on behalf of the 
Authorized Participant through one or more eligible companies (each, a 
``Liquidity Provider'') that have entered into a Participant Agreement 
with the Sponsor, the Administrator, the Marketing Agent, and the 
relevant Authorized Participant.
    The Participant Agreement provides the procedures for the creation 
of Baskets and for the delivery of the whole and fractional ETH 
required for such creations. The Participant Agreement and the related 
procedures attached thereto may be amended by the Sponsor and the 
relevant Authorized Participant. Under the Participant Agreement, the 
Sponsor has agreed to indemnify each Authorized Participant against 
certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.
    Authorized Participants do not pay a transaction fee to the Trust 
in connection with the creation of Baskets, but there may be 
transaction fees associated with the validation of the transfer of ETH 
by the Ethereum Network. Authorized Participants who deposit ETH with 
the Trust in exchange for Baskets will receive no fees, commissions or 
other form of compensation or inducement of any kind from either the 
Sponsor or the Trust, and no such person has any obligation or 
responsibility to the Sponsor or the Trust to effect any sale or resale 
of Shares.
Creation Procedures
    On any business day, an Authorized Participant may place an order 
with the Administrator to create one or more Baskets. Orders for 
creations may be placed either ``in-kind'' or ``in-cash.'' Orders for 
creation in-kind must be placed with the Administrator no later than 
3:59:59 p.m., New York time, and no later than 4:59:59 p.m., New York 
time, for creations in-cash (in each case, the ``Order Cutoff Time'').
    In-kind creations will take place as follows, where ``T'' is the 
trade date and each day in the sequence must be a business day:

[[Page 73908]]

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   T                                   T+1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 The Authorized Participant       The Authorized
 places a creation order with the         Participant transfers the
 Administrator.                           Total Basket Amount to the
 The Marketing Agent accepts      Custodian no later than 4:00
 (or rejects) the creation order, which   p.m., New York time.
 is communicated to the Authorized        Once the Total Basket
 Participant by the Administrator.        Amount is received by the
 The Total Basket Amount is       Custodian, the Administrator
 determined as soon as practicable        directs the Transfer Agent to
 after 4:00 p.m., New York time.          credit the number of Baskets
                                          created to the Authorized
                                          Participant's DTC account.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In-cash creations will take place as follows, where ``T'' is the 
trade date and each day in the sequence must be a business day:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               T-1                         T                  T+1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 The Authorized            The         The
 Participant places a creation     Sponsor notifies    Liquidity
 order with the Administrator.     the Liquidity       Provider delivers
 The Marketing Agent       Provider of the     the Total Basket
 accepts (or rejects) the          creation order      Amount to the
 creation order, which is          and the Liquidity   Custodian no
 communicated to the Authorized    Provider may        later than 4:00
 Participant by the                begin purchasing    p.m., New York
 Administrator.                    ETH to deliver      time.
 The Authorized            the Total Basket    Once the
 Participant sends 110% of the     Amount.             Total Basket
 U.S. dollar value of the number   The Total   Amount is
 of baskets ordered pursuant to    Basket Amount is    received by the
 such creation order, as           determined as       Custodian, the
 calculated using the Index        soon as             Administrator
 Price as of the order date (the   practicable after   directs the
 ``Cash Collateral Amount'') to    4:00 p.m., New      Transfer Agent to
 the Administrator.                York time.          credit the number
                                                       of Baskets
                                                       created to the
                                                       Authorized
                                                       Participant's DTC
                                                       account.
                                                       The
                                                       Administrator
                                                       sends the
                                                       Liquidity
                                                       Provider cash
                                                       equal to the U.S.
                                                       dollar value of
                                                       the Total Basket
                                                       Amount, as
                                                       determined on the
                                                       trade date, plus
                                                       the Variable Fee,
                                                       and returns the
                                                       remaining amount
                                                       of the Cash
                                                       Collateral Amount
                                                       (if any) to the
                                                       Authorized
                                                       Participant.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Redemption of Shares
    The Trust may redeem Shares from time to time but only in Baskets. 
A Basket equals a block of 100 Shares. The number of outstanding Shares 
is expected to decrease from time to time as a result of the redemption 
of Baskets. The redemption of Baskets requires the distribution by the 
Trust of the number of ETH represented by the Baskets being redeemed. 
The redemption of a Basket will be made only in exchange for the 
distribution by the Trust of the number of whole and fractional ETH 
represented by each Basket being redeemed, the number of which is 
determined by dividing (x) the number of ETH owned by the Trust at 4:00 
p.m., New York time, on the relevant trade date of a redemption order, 
after deducting the number of ETH representing the U.S. dollar value of 
accrued but unpaid fees and expenses of the Trust (converted using the 
Index Price at such time, and carried to the eighth decimal place) by 
(y) the number of Shares outstanding at such time (with the quotient so 
obtained calculated to one one-hundred-millionth of one ETH (i.e., 
carried to the eighth decimal place)), and multiplying such quotient by 
100.
    Authorized Participants are the only persons that may place orders 
to redeem Baskets. Shareholders who are not Authorized Participants 
will be able to redeem their Shares only through an Authorized 
Participant.
    Each Participant Agreement provides the procedures for the 
redemption of Baskets and for the delivery of the whole and fractional 
ETH required for such redemption. The Participant Agreement and the 
related procedures attached thereto may be amended by the Sponsor and 
the relevant Authorized Participant.
    Authorized Participants do not pay a transaction fee to the Trust 
in connection with the redemption of Baskets, but there may be 
transaction fees associated with the validation of the transfer of ETH 
by the Ethereum Network.
Redemption Procedures
    The Trust will also redeem Shares on a continuous basis but only in 
Baskets of 100 Shares. The procedures by which an Authorized 
Participant can redeem one or more Baskets mirror the procedures for 
the creation of Baskets. On any business day, an Authorized Participant 
may place an order with the Administrator to redeem one or more 
Baskets. Redemption orders must be placed with the Administrator no 
later than the Order Cutoff Time.
    In-kind redemptions will take place as follows, where ``T'' is the 
trade date and each day in the sequence must be a business day:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   T                                   T+2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 The Authorized Participant       The Authorized
 places a redemption order with the       Participant delivers Baskets
 Administrator.                           from its DTC account to the
 The Marketing Agent accepts      Transfer Agent no later than
 (or rejects) the redemption order,       4:00 p.m., New York time.
 which is communicated to the             Once the Baskets are
 Authorized Participant by the            received by the Transfer
 Administrator.                           Agent, the Custodian transfers
 The Total Basket Amount is       the Total Basket Amount to the
 determined as soon as practicable        Authorized Participant and the
 after 4:00 p.m., New York time.          Transfer Agent cancels the
                                          Shares.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 73909]]

    In-cash redemptions will take place as follows, where ``T'' is the 
trade date and each day in the sequence must be a business day:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               T-1                         T                  T+2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 The Authorized            The         The
 Participant places a redemption   Sponsor notifies    Authorized
 order with the Administrator.     the Liquidity       Participant
 The Marketing Agent       Provider of the     delivers Baskets
 accepts (or rejects) the          redemption order    to be redeemed to
 redemption order, which is        and the Liquidity   the Transfer
 communicated to the Authorized    Provider may        Agent no later
 Participant by the                begin selling ETH   than 4:00 p.m.,
 Administrator.                    to deliver the      New York time.
                                   Total Basket        The
                                   Amount.             Liquidity
                                   The Total   Provider deposits
                                   Basket Amount is    with the
                                   determined as       Administrator
                                   soon as             cash equal to the
                                   practicable after   U.S. dollar value
                                   4:00 p.m., New      of the Total
                                   York time.          Basket Amount, as
                                                       determined on the
                                                       trade date.
                                                       Once the
                                                       Baskets are
                                                       received by the
                                                       Transfer Agent
                                                       and the
                                                       Administrator
                                                       sends the above-
                                                       mentioned cash
                                                       equal to the U.S.
                                                       dollar value of
                                                       the Total Basket
                                                       Amount less the
                                                       Transaction Fee,
                                                       the Variable Fee
                                                       and all other
                                                       charges and fees
                                                       payable in
                                                       connection with
                                                       the redemption
                                                       order to the
                                                       Authorized
                                                       Participant, the
                                                       Transfer Agent
                                                       cancels the
                                                       Shares.
                                                       The
                                                       Custodian sends
                                                       the Liquidity
                                                       Provider the
                                                       number of ETH
                                                       equal to the
                                                       Total Basket
                                                       Amount and the
                                                       Administrator
                                                       sends the
                                                       Variable Fee to
                                                       the Liquidity
                                                       Provider.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Suspension of Orders
    The creation or redemption of Shares may be suspended generally, or 
refused with respect to particular requested creations or redemptions, 
during any period when the transfer books of the Transfer Agent are 
closed or if circumstances outside the control of the Sponsor or its 
delegates make it for all practical purposes not feasible to process 
creation orders or redemption orders. The Administrator may reject an 
order or, after accepting an order, may cancel such order by rejecting 
the Total Basket Amount if: (i) such order is not presented in proper 
form as described in the Participant Agreement, (ii) the transfer of 
the Total Basket Amount comes from an account other than an ETH wallet 
address that is known to the Custodian as belonging to the Authorized 
Participant or (iii) the fulfillment of the order, in the opinion of 
counsel, might be unlawful, among other reasons. None of the Sponsor or 
its delegates will be liable for the suspension, rejection or 
acceptance of any creation order or redemption order.
    In particular, upon the Trust's receipt of any Incidental Rights 
and/or IR Virtual Currency in connection with a fork, airdrop or 
similar event, the Sponsor may suspend redemptions until it is able to 
cause the Trust to sell or distribute such Incidental Rights and/or IR 
Virtual Currency.
Availability of Information
    The Trust's website (https://grayscale.com/products/grayscale-ethereum-trust/) will include quantitative information on a per Share 
basis updated on a daily basis, including, (i) the current Digital 
Asset Holdings per Share daily and the prior business day's Digital 
Asset Holdings per Share and the reported closing price of the Shares; 
(ii) the mid-point of the bid-ask price \56\ as of the time the Digital 
Asset Holdings per Share is calculated (``Bid-Ask Price'') and a 
calculation of the premium or discount of such price against such 
Digital Asset Holdings per Share; and (iii) data in chart format 
displaying the frequency distribution of discounts and premiums of the 
daily Bid-Ask Price against the Digital Asset Holdings per Share, 
within appropriate ranges, for each of the four previous calendar 
quarters (or for as long as the Trust has been trading as an ETP if 
shorter). In addition, on each business day the Trust's website will 
provide pricing information for the Shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \56\ The bid-ask price of the Trust is determined using the 
highest bid and lowest offer on the Consolidated Tape as of the time 
of calculation of the closing day Digital Asset Holdings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    One or more major market data vendors, will provide an intra-day 
indicative value (``IIV'') per Share updated every 15 seconds, as 
calculated by the Exchange or a third party financial data provider 
during the Exchange's Core Trading Session (9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., 
E.T.).\57\ The IIV will be calculated using the same methodology as the 
Digital Asset Holdings per Share of the Trust (as described above), 
specifically by using the prior day's closing Digital Asset Holdings 
per Share as a base and updating that value during the NYSE Arca Core 
Trading Session to reflect changes in the value of the Trust's Digital 
Asset Holdings during the trading day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \57\ The IIV on a per Share basis disseminated during the Core 
Trading Session should not be viewed as a real-time update of the 
Digital Asset Holdings, which is calculated once a day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The IIV disseminated during the NYSE Arca Core Trading Session 
should not be viewed as an actual real-time update of the Digital Asset 
Holdings per Share, which will be calculated only once at the end of 
each trading day. The IIV will be widely disseminated on a per Share 
basis every 15 seconds during the NYSE Arca Core Trading Session by one 
or more major market data vendors. In addition, the IIV will be 
available through on-line information services.
    The Digital Asset Holdings for the Trust will be calculated by the 
Sponsor once a day and will be disseminated daily to all market 
participants at the same time. To the extent that the Sponsor has 
utilized the cascading set of rules described in ``Index Price'' above, 
the Trust's website will note the valuation methodology used and the 
price per ETH resulting from such calculation. Quotation and last-sale 
information regarding the Shares will be disseminated through the 
facilities of the Consolidated Tape Association (``CTA'').
    Quotation and last sale information for ETH will be widely 
disseminated through a variety of major market data vendors, including 
Bloomberg and Reuters. In addition, real-time price (and volume) data 
for ETH is available by subscription from Reuters and Bloomberg. The 
spot price of ETH is available on a 24-hour basis from major market 
data vendors, including Bloomberg and Reuters. Information relating to 
trading, including price and

[[Page 73910]]

volume information, in ETH will be available from major market data 
vendors and from the exchanges on which ETH are traded. The normal 
trading hours for Digital Asset Exchanges are 24-hours per day, 365-
days per year.
    On each business day, the Sponsor will publish the Index Price, the 
Trust's Digital Asset Holdings, and the Digital Asset Holdings per 
Share on the Trust's website as soon as practicable after its 
determination. If the Digital Asset Holdings and Digital Asset Holdings 
per Share have been calculated using a price per ETH other than the 
Index Price for such Evaluation Time, the publication on the Trust's 
website will note the valuation methodology used and the price per ETH 
resulting from such calculation.
    The Trust will provide website disclosure of its Digital Asset 
Holdings daily. The website disclosure of the Trust's Digital Asset 
Holdings will occur at the same time as the disclosure by the Sponsor 
of the Digital Asset Holdings to Authorized Participants so that all 
market participants are provided such portfolio information at the same 
time. Therefore, the same portfolio information will be provided on the 
public website as well as in electronic files provided to Authorized 
Participants. Accordingly, each investor will have access to the 
current Digital Asset Holdings of the Trust through the Trust's 
website, as well as from one or more major market data vendors.
    The value of the Index, as well as additional information regarding 
the Index, will be available on a continuous basis at https://www.coindesk.com/indices.
Trading Rules
    The Exchange deems the Shares to be equity securities, thus 
rendering trading in the Shares subject to the Exchange's existing 
rules governing the trading of equity securities. Shares will trade on 
the NYSE Arca Marketplace from 4:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., E.T. in 
accordance with NYSE Arca Rule 7.34-E (Early, Core, and Late Trading 
Sessions). The Exchange has appropriate rules to facilitate 
transactions in the Shares during all trading sessions. As provided in 
NYSE Arca Rule 7.6-E, the minimum price variation (``MPV'') for quoting 
and entry of orders in equity securities traded on the NYSE Arca 
Marketplace is $0.01, with the exception of securities that are priced 
less than $1.00, for which the MPV for order entry is $0.0001.
    The Shares will conform to the initial and continued listing 
criteria under NYSE Arca Rule 8.201-E. The trading of the Shares will 
be subject to NYSE Arca Rule 8.201-E(g), which sets forth certain 
restrictions on Equity Trading Permit Holders (``ETP Holders'') acting 
as registered Market Makers in Commodity-Based Trust Shares to 
facilitate surveillance. The Exchange represents that, for initial and 
continued listing, the Trust will be in compliance with Rule 10A-3 \58\ 
under the Act, as provided by NYSE Arca Rule 5.3-E. A minimum of 
100,000 Shares of the Trust will be outstanding at the commencement of 
trading on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \58\ 17 CFR 240.10A-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trading Halts
    With respect to trading halts, the Exchange may consider all 
relevant factors in exercising its discretion to halt or suspend 
trading in the Shares of the Trust.\59\ Trading in Shares of the Trust 
will be halted if the circuit breaker parameters in NYSE Arca Rule 
7.12-E have been reached. Trading also may be halted because of market 
conditions or for reasons that, in the view of the Exchange, make 
trading in the Shares inadvisable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \59\ See NYSE Arca Rule 7.12-E.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange may halt trading during the day in which an 
interruption to the dissemination of the IIV or the value of the Index 
occurs. If the interruption to the dissemination of the IIV or the 
value of the Index persists past the trading day in which it occurred, 
the Exchange will halt trading no later than the beginning of the 
trading day following the interruption. In addition, if the Exchange 
becomes aware that the Digital Asset Holdings per Share is not 
disseminated to all market participants at the same time, it will halt 
trading in the Shares until such time as the Digital Asset Holdings per 
Share is available to all market participants.
Surveillance
    The Exchange represents that trading in the Shares of the Trust 
will be subject to the existing trading surveillances administered by 
the Exchange, as well as cross-market surveillances administered by 
FINRA on behalf of the Exchange, which are designed to detect 
violations of Exchange rules and applicable federal securities 
laws.\60\ The Exchange represents that these procedures are adequate to 
properly monitor Exchange trading of the Shares in all trading sessions 
and to deter and detect violations of Exchange rules and federal 
securities laws applicable to trading on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \60\ FINRA conducts cross-market surveillances on behalf of the 
Exchange pursuant to a regulatory services agreement. The Exchange 
is responsible for FINRA's performance under this regulatory 
services agreement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The surveillances referred to above generally focus on detecting 
securities trading outside their normal patterns, which could be 
indicative of manipulative or other violative activity. When such 
situations are detected, surveillance analysis follows and 
investigations are opened, where appropriate, to review the behavior of 
all relevant parties for all relevant trading violations.
    The Exchange or FINRA, on behalf of the Exchange, or both, will 
communicate as needed regarding trading in the Shares with other 
markets and other entities that are members of the ISG, and the 
Exchange or FINRA, on behalf of the Exchange, or both, may obtain 
trading information regarding trading in the Shares from such markets 
and other entities. In addition, the Exchange may obtain information 
regarding trading in the Shares from markets and other entities that 
are members of ISG or with which the Exchange has in place a 
comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement (``CSSA'').\61\ The 
Exchange is also able to obtain information regarding trading in the 
Shares in connection with such ETP Holders' proprietary or customer 
trades which they effect through ETP Holders on any relevant market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \61\ For a list of the current members of ISG, see 
www.isgportal.org. The Exchange notes that not all components of the 
Trust may trade on markets that are members of ISG or with which the 
Exchange has in place a CSSA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange also has a general policy prohibiting the 
distribution of material, non-public information by its employees.
    All statements and representations made in this filing regarding 
(a) the description of the portfolios of the Trust, (b) limitations on 
portfolio holdings or reference assets, or (c) the applicability of 
Exchange listing rules specified in this rule filing shall constitute 
continued listing requirements for listing the Shares on the Exchange.
    The Sponsor has represented to the Exchange that it will advise the 
Exchange of any failure by the Trust to comply with the continued 
listing requirements, and, pursuant to its obligations under Section 
19(g)(1) of the Act, the Exchange will monitor for compliance with the 
continued listing requirements. If the Trust is not in compliance with 
the applicable listing requirements, the Exchange will commence 
delisting procedures under NYSE Arca Rule 5.5-E(m).

[[Page 73911]]

Information Bulletin
    Prior to the commencement of trading, the Exchange will inform its 
ETP Holders in an ``Information Bulletin'' of the special 
characteristics and risks associated with trading the Shares. 
Specifically, the Information Bulletin will discuss the following: (1) 
the procedures for creations of Shares in Baskets; (2) NYSE Arca Rule 
9.2-E(a), which imposes a duty of due diligence on its ETP Holders to 
learn the essential facts relating to every customer prior to trading 
the Shares; (3) information regarding how the value of the Index and 
the IIV are disseminated; (4) the possibility that trading spreads and 
the resulting premium or discount on the Shares may widen during the 
Opening and Late Trading Sessions, when an updated IIV will not be 
calculated or publicly disseminated; and (5) trading information. The 
Exchange notes that investors purchasing Shares directly from the Trust 
will receive a prospectus.
    In addition, the Information Bulletin will reference that the Trust 
is subject to various fees and expenses as described in the Annual 
Report. The Information Bulletin will disclose that information about 
the Shares of the Trust is publicly available on the Trust's website.
    The Information Bulletin will also discuss any relief, if granted, 
by the Commission or the staff from any rules under the Act.
2. Statutory Basis
    The basis under the Act for this proposed rule change is the 
requirement under Section 6(b)(5) \62\ that an exchange have rules that 
are designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, 
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove 
impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market 
and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \62\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is designed to 
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices in that the 
Shares will be listed and traded on the Exchange pursuant to the 
initial and continued listing criteria in NYSE Arca Rule 8.201-E. The 
Exchange has in place surveillance procedures that are adequate to 
properly monitor trading in the Shares in all trading sessions and to 
deter and detect violations of Exchange rules and applicable federal 
securities laws. The Exchange or FINRA, on behalf of the Exchange, or 
both, will communicate as needed regarding trading in the Shares with 
other markets that are members of the ISG, and the Exchange or FINRA, 
on behalf of the Exchange, or both, may obtain trading information 
regarding trading in the Shares from such markets. In addition, the 
Exchange may obtain information regarding trading in the Shares from 
markets that are members of ISG or with which the Exchange has in place 
a CSSA. Also, pursuant to NYSE Arca Rule 8.201-E(g), the Exchange is 
able to obtain information regarding trading in the Shares and the 
underlying ETH or any ETH derivative through ETP Holders acting as 
registered Market Makers, in connection with such ETP Holders' 
proprietary or customer trades through ETP Holders which they effect on 
any relevant market.
    The proposed rule change is also designed to prevent fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices because, although the Digital Asset 
Exchange Market is not inherently resistant to fraud and manipulation, 
the Index serves as a means sufficient to mitigate the impact of 
instances of fraud and manipulation on a reference price for ETH. 
Specifically, the Index provides a better benchmark for the price of 
ETH than the Digital Asset Exchange Market price because it (1) tracks 
the Digital Asset Exchange Market price through trading activity at 
U.S.-Compliant Exchanges; (2) mitigates the impact of instances of 
fraud, manipulation and other anomalous trading activity in real-time 
through systematic adjustments; (3) is constructed and maintained by an 
expert third-party index provider, allowing for prudent handling of 
non-market-related events; and (4) mitigates the impact of instances of 
fraud, manipulation and other anomalous trading activity concentrated 
on any one specific exchange through a cross-exchange composite index 
rate. The Trust has used the Index to price the Shares for more than 
four years, and the Index has proven its ability to (i) mitigate the 
effects of fraud, manipulation and other anomalous trading activity 
from impacting the ETH reference rate, (ii) provide a real-time, 
volume-weighted fair value of ETH and (iii) appropriately handle and 
adjust for non-market related events, such that efforts to manipulate 
the price of ETH would have had a negligible effect on the pricing of 
the Trust, due to the controls embedded in the structure of the Index. 
In addition, certain of the Index's Constituent Exchanges also have or 
have begun to implement market surveillance infrastructure to further 
detect, prevent, and respond to fraud, attempted fraud, and similar 
wrongdoing, including market manipulation. The proposed rule change is 
also designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices 
based on the existence of the CME futures market as a large, surveilled 
and regulated market that is closely connected with the spot market for 
ETH and through which the Exchange could obtain information to assist 
in detecting and deterring potential fraud or manipulation.
    The proposed rule change is designed to promote just and equitable 
principles of trade and to protect investors and the public interest in 
that there is a considerable amount of ETH price and market information 
available on public websites and through professional and subscription 
services. Investors may obtain, on a 24-hour basis, ETH pricing 
information based on the spot price for ETH from various financial 
information service providers. The closing price and settlement prices 
of ETH are readily available from the Digital Asset Exchanges and other 
publicly available websites. In addition, such prices are published in 
public sources, or on-line information services such as Bloomberg and 
Reuters. The Digital Asset Holdings per Share will be calculated daily 
and made available to all market participants at the same time. The 
Trust will provide website disclosure of its Digital Asset Holdings 
daily. One or more major market data vendors will disseminate for the 
Trust on a daily basis information with respect to the most recent 
Digital Asset Holdings per Share and Shares outstanding. In addition, 
if the Exchange becomes aware that the Digital Asset Holdings per Share 
is not disseminated to all market participants at the same time, it 
will halt trading in the Shares until such time as the Digital Asset 
Holdings is available to all market participants. Quotation and last-
sale information regarding the Shares will be disseminated through the 
facilities of the CTA. The IIV will be widely disseminated on a per 
Share basis every 15 seconds during the NYSE Arca Core Trading Session 
(normally 9:30 a.m., E.T., to 4:00 p.m., E.T.) by one or more major 
market data vendors. The Exchange represents that the Exchange may halt 
trading during the day in which an interruption to the dissemination of 
the IIV or the value of the Index occurs. If the interruption to the 
dissemination of the IIV or the value of the Index persists past the 
trading day in which it occurred, the Exchange will halt trading no 
later than the beginning

[[Page 73912]]

of the trading day following the interruption.
    The proposed rule change is designed to perfect the mechanism of a 
free and open market and, in general, to protect investors and the 
public interest in that it will facilitate the listing and trading of 
an additional type of exchange-traded product that will enhance 
competition among market participants, to the benefit of investors and 
the marketplace. As noted above, the Exchange has in place surveillance 
procedures relating to trading in the Shares and may obtain information 
via ISG from other exchanges that are members of ISG or with which the 
Exchange has entered into a CSSA. In addition, as noted above, 
investors will have ready access to information regarding the Trust's 
Digital Asset Holdings, IIV, and quotation and last sale information 
for the Shares.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange notes that the 
proposed rule change will facilitate the listing and trading of an 
additional type of exchange-traded product, and the first such product 
based on ETH, which will enhance competition among market participants, 
to the benefit of investors and the marketplace.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the 
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be 
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) by order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or
    (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
file number SR-NYSEARCA-2023-70 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSEARCA-2023-70. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for 
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not 
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We 
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted 
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All 
submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSEARCA-2023-70 and should 
be submitted on or before November 17, 2023.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\63\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \63\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-23703 Filed 10-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P